The URL can be used to link to this page

HRA 01/13/1983 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING THURSDAY, JANUARY 13, 1983 7:30 P.M. CITY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING THURSDAY, JANUARY 13, 1983 7:30 P.M. Location: Council Chamber (upper level ) CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: DECEMBER 9, 1982 I. CENTER CITY DISTRICT A. Phase II Improvements 1 . Memo #83-01 , Executive Director (information included) a. Resolution HRA-1-1983 (Approving Final Phase II Layout) b. Resolution HRA 2-1983 (Petitioning the City to do the Parking Lot Improvements) c. Agreement of Cooperation with the City of Fridley (RE: Parking Lot Maintenance) 2. Plaza Design Presentation - InterDesign a. Memo #83-02, Executive Director (information included) b. Resolution HRA 3-1983 3. Building Plan Approval - Clinic & Office Building a. Resolution HRA 4-1983 b. Resolution HRA 5-1983 4. Correspondence - Virgil Herrick (Hardel Condemnation) 5. Report from Bill Von Klug (at meeting) II. NORTH AREA DISTRICT A. Request for Assistance - Jerry Paschke 1 . Memo #83-03, Executive Director (information included) III. MOORE LAKE DISTRICT A. Development Proposal for Old Central - Dick Mochinski 1. Memo #83-04, Executive Director Agenda Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting Thursday, January 13, 1983 Page 2 B. Update on Condo Project a. Memo #82-05, Executive Director IV. FINANCIAL A. Financial Report B. Check Register V. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURMENT: CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING DECEMBER 9, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the December 9, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Commers, Mr. Prieditis, Mr. airie, Ms. Svendsen Members Absent: Mr. Ras sen Others Present: Jerrold Boa man,City Planner John Flora, Public Works Director Bill Deblon, Associate Planner Jim Robinson, Planning Staff Bob Barnette, Councilman Dennis Schneider, Councilman Ed Hamernik, Councilman Erland Eckberg, 2140 Spruce Trail , Golden Valley Ruth Dunn, Fridley Sun See attached list APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 18, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO APPROVE THE NOV. 18, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 . MOORE LAKE DISTRICT a. Proposal for 96-unit Condominium Project by Erland Eckberg Mr. Coroners stated the HRA had sent notices out regarding the presentation Mr. Eckberg was going to make at this meeting. He stated this was an open meeting based on those notices. At this time, he would turn the meeting over to Mr. Boardman, Executive Director of the HRA. Mr. Boardman stated he would like to discuss briefly what the Moore Lake Redevelopment District was. He stated the Moore Lake Redevelopment District was established in early 1981 . The boundary on the south is 694, it goes up Highway 65 and includes the commercial/retail area that has the bowling alley, pet clinic, and funeral home, goes across Highway 65 to include the Shorewood Shopping Center, includes the area along Old Central north to Mississippi St. , and then along Old Central south back to 694. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated the City, along with the HRA, has established three redevelopment districts in the City--the Center City Redevelopment District, the Moore Lake Redevelopment District, and the North Area District on University Ave. in the area of the Springbrook Nature Center. Mr. Boardman stated that in looking at the overall city, they have selected areas that have deteriorating conditions, such as vacant lands, property that hasn't developed because of poor soil conditions, and non-use of land (example is the drive-in facility that has not come on the tax roles for the City like it should). Mr. Boardman briefly explained what a tax increment district means. He stated the general purpose of the establishment of a tax increment district is because within the next years, the City and the HRA feel that certain properties will not develop and, therefore, will be a burden to the tax- payers without any development. Tax increment means that the development generated through assistance from the HRA pays for the improvements that are necessary because of that development. Mr. Boardman stated that, at this point in time, the City has not done any traffic studies or traffic analysis in the Moore Lake area,but he would like to explain some of the City's thoughts on the development around the Moore Lake area. Mr. Boardman stated it has always been the City's concern that the Shore- wood Shopping Center is not a viable center in the sense that it is not providing the type of neighborhood services that are necessary within the community. Overall , in the City's comprehensive planning, they have looked at the Holly Center and the Center City area for city-wide shopping, and have designated several areas as neighborhood shopping centers. Shorewood is one of those areas designated for a neighborhood shopping center. It is the City's intent to revitalize the Shorewood area and make it a more viable neighborhood shopping area. One of the problems in this area has been the traffic on Old Central . Those traffic problems are primarily bypass problems. Mr. Boardman stated that with some intersection modifications, they could possibly turn Old Central into a greenway system. One of the intersection modifications would be at Rice Creek Road and Old Central . Another inter- section that needs modifying is at Old Central and Highway 65. Mr. Boardman stated that in looking at the overall development, one way of making this a viable area was to develop more housing. The City of Fridley is about 98% developed in housing, and they feel there is a need for alternative types of housing. They have looked at this area as a viable area for ownership housing such as ownership-townhouse or ownership-condo- minium. They have also looked at doing some type of elderly housing on the corner of Old Central and Rice Creek Road. There is a need in the City of Fridley for elderly housing. Village Green in Fridley and most of the elderly housing in the County have waiting lists that are quite lengthy. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman stated that at the intersection of Moore Lake Drive and Highway 65, there are service road problems that create unnecessary congestion at that intersection. They would be attempting to eliminate the service drive in that area, redirect the traffic flow to the Shore- wood Inn from behind, and provide adequate parking for the Shorewood Inn. Mr. Boardman stated one important resource in this area is Moore Lake, The City Council has committed itself to the clean-up of Moore Lake. He stated he thought one of the things they look at when they talk about a tax increment district is how they can best serve the community and best serve this area. Mr. Boardman stated that, at this time, he would turn the meeting over to the developer, Mr. Erland Eckberg, who is making the proposal to the HRA at this meeting for a 96-unit condominium project. Mr. Erland Eckberg stated he was the owner of Eckberg Assoc. Architects. He stated that for some time, they have been looking for a desirable site for this type of project. He felt the Fridley site was the most desirable and the kind or project they are interested in. Mr. Eckberg stated there are two 13-story towers that are of brick and reinforced concrete construction. The orientation of the two towers would indicate that the relationship of the towers to Moore Lake and the exposure of both the south and southwest was very important to the success of this project. He stated access would be off Old Central with the drive- ways leading around to the two units. Guest parking and entrance to the towers would be at grade level . The owners of the condominium units would drive around to the side and drive in at a lower elevation to a two-level garage which has the same configuration as the guest parking lot. Mr. Eckberg stated most of the glass would be facing the water, and they have developed the buildings in such a way so the walls have a shadow affect which would give a very interesting profile to the buildings. Mr. Eckberg stated the main entrance is the amenity level and then there would be 12 levels of residents above that. There are four units to a floor with two electric elevators servicing each floor. There are a total of 45 units per building. He stated they intend to do a lot of land- scaping with berming and trees. He stated trees would be saved wherever possible, plus they would plant new trees and plantings to complement the entire site. The intent is to continue the park-like affect that already exists. They are hoping it would actually upgrade the park affect. Walkways from the existing park would go on into this area and on to a possible senior citizen project on the corner of Rice Creek Road and Old Central . Mr. Eckberg stated each unit has two bathrooms, two bedrooms, one grand room, a large kitchen, snack area, formal dining room, and laundry space. Each room has individual balconies that look out over the water. A lot of the interior walls will be of exposed brick. The entire facility, including the garage areas, will have a sprinkling system. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Eckberg stated they did not provide for outside tennis courts, out- side or inside swimming pools, because they wanted to keep the monthly service fee at a manageable level , and to keep the site parklike. Mr. Eckberg stated that as the developer of the project, he would also be the architect and the builder of the project. One of the reasons for developing the project was because he intended to be one of the residents of the building. Mr. Boardman stated that in looking at the project development, Staff had looked at the affect of the views of the area. He showed five slides of the proposed development as seen from five different locations. Mr. Commers asked what the total proposed cost was for the overall project and what the size was of the parcel of land requested. Mr. Eckberg stated each building represents approximately $7 million, so the overall project was in the neighborhood of $14 million. He stated the parcel of land is about 10.2 acres. Mr. Prairie asked Mr. Eckberg what the height of the buildings would be. Mr. Eckberg stated that from floor to floor is 10 ft. , so the elevation of the walkout facing the lake would be 130 ft. It would be 120 ft. from Old Central because of the change in grade. Mr. Prieditis asked about the cost of each unit and the size of each unit. Mr. Eckberg stated that right now they are looking at a range of $150,000- $175,000 per unit. Much will depend on how the bids turn out when they bid the project. The average size of each unit is 1 ,540 sq. ft. and about 450 sq. ft. of balconies for each unit. Mr. Commers asked if Mr. Eckberg had done any soil testing in this area to determine the feasibility of the site to sustain these buildings. Mr. Eckberg stated he has talked to people who have looked at this general area and who have told him the soil is favorable in the area he is looking at, but he has not done any soil borings at this time. He felt they were holding these buildings back far enough so they would be out of the poor soil area, but that would have to be confirmed with a soil test. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Eckberg what the feasibility of the project was in terms of the availability of financing and what would be the timing on the project, if there was a go-ahead. Mr. Eckberg stated that if the concept is approved by the HRA, they would build an actual model of one of the units on one of the vacant pieces of land near the site, and then presell 80% of the first building. They would not start any construction until 80% of the units in the first building was sold. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 5 Mr. Commers stated that from the time 80% of the first building was presold, what would be the timing required to actually begin and finish _ construction? Mr. Eckberg stated the construction phase would take about 12 months. As soon as they presell the 80% on the first building, they would start preselling for the second building so there would not be a time lag between the construction of the two buildings. Some people may even prefer to be in the second building. Mr. Prairie asked that if there were not enough sales on the second building, would a second building be built? Mr. Eckberg stated he believed that if they were able to sell 80% of the first building, the second one would sell fairly easily. Mr. Commers asked that with regard to this particular site, was there any possibility of any leeway of movement of the buildings within this area? Mr. Eckberg stated the buildings can be shifted. However, they have located in the most idealistic spot with relationship to the lake, the road, and the geography of the land. Mr. Coroners stated he would now open up the discussion and hear comments and questions from the audience. Mr. Walter Rydberg, 6127 Woody Lane, N.E. , stated he has lived in this area for 25 years. He remembered when the sewer and water was put in, and he did not think the sewer and water pipes were big enough to handle these big buildings. The same was true for electricity, plus the City was talking about building another apartment for the elderly on the corner of Rice Creek Road and Old Central . Where were all these utilities going to come from? He stated there is also a traffic problem. How is this traffic going to be handled? Mr. Boardman stated that when Mr. Eckberg came in with this proposal , Staff looked at it in relationship to the total development in this area. The sewer and water and storm sewer are all in place and will handle a great deal more than this one project. This proposed project, plus a townhouse project, and an elderly project would generate approximately .2 cu. ft. per second flow. The existing line capacity in that area presently has a capacity of 6.25 cu. ft. per second. There has never been a problem in this area with sewer capacity. The water line is a 12-inch line, and the sewer line is an 8-inch line and would handle the capacity. According to theLCity Engineers, the capacity right now is far below what the actual usage could be. Mr. Commers stated they do recognize there is a traffic problem, and that is part of the reason why they are trying to do some redevelopment in the area in order to help remedy the traffic problem that does exist. Whether or not this project goes, there is going to have to be some traffic improve- HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING,DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 6 ments on Old Central , either in terms of trying to divert the Medtronic and Onan traffic over to Highway 65 before it comes down to Rice Creek Road, and something has to be done at the intersection of Old Central and Highway 65. But, they need some development to get the taxes from the development to make the changes that are necessary. Ms. Jackie Lentz, 6053 Central Ave. N.E. , stated she was very impressed with Mr. Eckberg's buildings. They would be lovely to live in, but most of the residents feel the site chosen is not the most favorable for them. She stated she had been chosen by a group of the neighbors in the district to present a letter and petition to the HRA. Ms. Lentz stated that a couple of years ago when the HRA had their initial hearings on the redevelopment areas, she did attend and at that time, there was talk about the possibility of townhouses, duplexes, and those types of housing being in this area. There was no out-cry from the citizenry at that time, and she felt those kinds of things were acceptable; however, at that time, nothing was mentioned about the possibility of highrises and certainly nothing was mentioned about taking people's property and homes. Consequently, it came as quite a surprise to the residents who received the letters and information in the mail a couple of weeks ago; possibly most surprising to those people whose property was involved. She stated they had a neighborhood meeting, and Mr. Boardman had been very generous to spend a lot of time with them answering questions and explain- ing the project. Ms. Lentz read the following petition letter: "We the undersigned home- owners in the area currently included in redevelopment district I on the east side of Moore Lake respectfully request that consideration of the highrise condominium proposal on the west side of Central Ave. be denied. This request is based on several areas of concern; a few of which are: (1 ) The property is, and has been at all times, zoned R-1 single family residential , the same as our homes. (2) All existing structures are less than two stories in height and the proposed multi-storied structures would be aesthetically inappropriate in our area. (3) The uncertainty of what type of traffic will be generated on an already heavily traveled road (Central Ave.). (4) The problem for the homeowners whose homes would be removed in locating any comparable property near a lake. (5) The potential loss in value to remaining homes near the highrise structures. "Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. We would be pleased to work with a neighborhood committee to assist the HRA on any proposals for improvements and/or developments in our area." Ms. Lentz stated she would also like to express a few more concerns that have been raised by the neighbors. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 7 Ms. Lentz stated one of those concerns was the usage of Moore Lake Park. Right now the park is almost to the point of being overused. If they added 96 more units, that is anywhere from 96-200+ people. The neighbors had been led to believe that tennis courts might be part of the new development, but that is not the case. Moore Lake Park has already got overloaded tennis courts. She stated the baseball diamonds and the picnic facilities would be very attractive for the people from the new develop- ment to use. Is this truly fair to the people in the City who are already able to use those facilities? Ms. Lentz stated the view and amenities the residents have with Moore Lake Park is one of the reasons why the neighbors bought in this particular area. Is that to be set aside in order to develop a highrise condominium? Ms. Lentz asked if an environmental study was going to be done which would deal with the usage of the park, and how a development of this kind would affect Moore Lake as a lake. Ms. Lentz stated the neighborhood, including the four property owners affected, had received this information in plain brown envelopes. Perhaps there is a manner in which the HRA can relay information to the people in a more considerate fashion. If she was one of the four property owners, she would have been very distraught and very upset and wondering as to what exactly was going on, and why they were not given some consideration to be at least forewarned of this kind of thing. Ms. Lentz stated the neighborhood wants to be of assistance to the City. They realize development needs to be done in this area, and they would like to help the City in finding a developer that would be acceptable to the City and the neighborhood. They would propose setting up a committee that would be updated on new plans, etc. She thanked the HRA very much for their time. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO RECEIVE PETITION NO. 11-82 INTO THE RECORD. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boardman to explain the removal of homes, if this project would proceed as it is presently proposed. Mr. Boardman stated there are six homes that would be removed for this development as proposed. By law, the HRA is required to meet the require- ments of the Federal Relocation Act. That requires them to get appraised values on those homes. The owners can also get their own appraisals; the City would then attempt to negotiate a purchase value. That purchase value wouldbe offered if a value can be negotiated. If a purchase value cannot be negotiated with a property owner, then the HRA has the alternative of going to condemnation. Preferably, the HRA would not have to go that direction. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 8 Mr. Boardman stated that, secondly, under HUD regulations, the HRA would pay damages (relocation fees). Those fees are set up to $15,000, and there has been action in the legislation to even increase those fees. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boardman if this proposed project would require an environmental study in terms of its relationship to Moore Lake. Mr. Boardman stated the development itself would not require an environ- mental assessment according to the Environmental Quality Commission. The only requirement of the development in relationship to Moore Lake is that it cannot be in the floodway. Shoreland management is not in effect in the metro area. Shoreland management is a 100 ft. setback. He stated the HRA can request an environmental study if they so choose, but it was his understanding that one was not required. Mr. Coroners stated the question was raised with regard to improvements and utilities that might be needed and whether new curbs and gutters might be needed on Old Central . Would any of these improvements be assessed against the property owners? Mr. Boardman stated that would be totally up to the HRA as to the direc- tion they want to go on a parkway system and how much the HRA would want to get involved in the development of that parkway system. He stated he was not sure what assessments there would even be. All Staff is suggest- ing at this time is they have the potential of looking at doing something with Old Central from Rice Creek Road south to where it joins Highway 65. It is merely a suggestion at this point because they feel it would enhance the environment, not only of the park area, but also for the people along Old Central . Mr. Commers stated that to clarify what Mr. Boardman has said, there are no plans for the redevelopment of Old Central at this time. If there is some plan to redo the area, at that time, it would be up to whatever body is going to do the remodeling and improvements to determine whether they can pay for it or whether there would be any assessments. Mr. Prieditis asked Mr. Boardman if any study has been done on the current traffic on Old Central . He was trying to relate how much traffic is gener- ated now by Medtronic, Onan, and other firms and businesses to how much it might increase with 96 more family units. Mr. Boardman stated there are traffic counts on Old Central , and he would guess there are approx. 10-12,000 vehicles per day on that road. That is a heavy load, and that is why the City feels traffic should be directed over to a highway that is developed to handle that volume of traffic. Mr. Bill Donohue, 1316 Hillcrest Dr. N.E. , stated about 15 years ago he read in a Minnesota Historical Society review that Moore Lake was one of the oldest native American sites in the U.S. He believed there was an old Indian burial ground behind St. Philips Lutheran Church. He wondered how many people actually knew about the history of Moore Lake. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 9 Mr. Ed Kaspszak, 1317 Hillcrest Dr. N.E. , stated he is opposed to the concept and the proposal as presented. However, as a taxpayer, he was also keenly aware that something needed to be done in that area. His only regret was that more thought and planning had not been put into it after so many years. He stated he was in the area when there was no Highway 65 and they took Old Central to get in and out of Minneapolis. Highway 65 came about because of the Highway Dept., and he can remember the large cranes digging into what was a swamp. That particular swamp has been dry, and it has also been flooded. Moore Lake is just a man- made hole. A few years ago, it was of great concern that Moore Lake would even survive at all . It was touch and go between the City Council and the federal government to get enough federal funding in order to make a study to see if the lake was even salvageable. Mr. Kaspszak stated he is in the marketing and advertising business, and he has a lot of clients who build condominiums. He questioned any kind of development where there is a risk that the lake may not even remain a lake. Mr. Kaspszak stated he found out about this project strictly by word of mouth. He was insulted as a taxpayer that a petitioner had to come to his door and inform him of what was going on. He had received no notice. He was told he did not live within the 350 ft. That was a ridiculous rule when it affects his property. He stated he bought the house, because the sunsets are fantastic. This particular project, the way it was pre- sented, would ruin that particular perspective, not only for him, but for everyone else who lives on Hillcrest. Mr. Kaspszak stated this whole development as presented is totally out of character with the neighborhood. He is not against development in that general area, but he felt it was improper that people should be asked to leave their homes. The concern has always been raised about the traffic from the north to the south, but he has not heard anything about the traffic that goes from the south to the north, which is also heavy. Mr. Conners stated that with respect to the notices that were sent out, the HRA did attempt to comply with the requirements, even thought it was not satisfactory to everyone. There has to be some reasonable limitations on who gets notified of these kinds of things. He stated they agreed to go as far as Woody Lane and did not follow up on Hillcrest. With regard to the lake itself, part of the reason for setting up the tax increment district was to lend some assistance to the reclamation of Moore Lake. Also, the City Council has approved a plan to go forward with trying to do some things with the lake. He asked Councilman Schneider to tell the status of Moore Lake from the City Council 's point of view. Mr. Schneider stated that 2-3 years ago, the City Council negotiated the first phase of the Moore Lake reclamation project. That effort included the diversion of the waters in Moore Lake park area, included a diversion for the waters coming off Harris Lake drainage area, and included the creation of a BASFU area. He stated the next phase of the project includes some minor dredging of the lake, some additional HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 10 diversionary ditching and channeling of water and control weirs within the lake, as well as some treatment at the bottom of the lake. A contract for that has been approved by the City Council. Mr. Coroners asked what amount of monies has been spent on the improvement of Moore Lake to date. Mr. Schneider stated there was approx. $468,000 in the first phase and $468,000 in the second phase. That is not all city money. In the first phase, 75% was non-city money, and the remaining 25% was collected out of capital improvement funds over a number of years. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boardman if there has been any suggestions on how the HRA could participate in the reclamation of Moore Lake. Mr. Boardman stated there has not been a lot of discussion, but that is one of the possible reasons why the tax increment distirct was established. The HRA can get involved in handling some of the assessments or some of the excess development problems or excess cash flow problems with tax increment that is generated from development. Mr. Harold Swanson, 6064 Woody Lane N.E. , stated he was against the development. He stated he had three major concerns: (1 ) the present property owners who live along Old Central ; most of them have lived there for a long time; (2) the proposed structures are too high for the area; (3) the traffic problem this development could present in the future. Mr. Swanson stated he realized there has to be some development in this area, but he could not understand why the buildings could not be moved a little farther north closer to Rice Creek Road in order to clean up that area. The present property owners could stay, and they could also divert some of the traffic on to Rice Creek Road. Ms. Dan Nelson, 6080 Central Ave. N.E. , stated they have purposely built their retirement home. It is their children's future home, their land, and their view. If Mr. Eckberg wants to move into a condominium, that was his privilege, but she did not want her privilege as an American taken away from her. The question was raised about fire prevention. Mr. Eckberg stated the Uniform Building Code specifically addresses what is required. There must be a complete fire sprinkler system in each unit and all common areas, including the garages. In addition, there are siamese connections on the exterior of the buildings so fire trucks and equipment can add additional pressure to the line if the situation arises. There will also be smoke alarms, and the whole system will be tied into the Fire Dept., so any alarms would be interfaced with the Fire Dept. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 11 Ms. Maria Donohue, 1316 Hillcrest Dr. N.E. , stated she was very concerned about the people who would have to leave their homes. She was also thinking of the location and that the people who would live in these condominiums would probably not have children. Fridley needs more children. Fridley's education system is suffering a great deal , and School Dist. #14 lost a referendum because of so many people who do not have children. The education system would suffer even more by having more people without children. Mr. David Landes, 5948 Woody Lane, N.E. , asked how the HRA was going to determine what decision was in the best interest of the people and the City. Mr. Commers stated that is why they are having this public hearing, to get all the input they can from the citizens. They will then try to balance that information and try to arrive at a decision that would be fair to the residents and also adhere to the goals the City has with respect to developing that land and increasing the taxes. Obviously, it will not be an easy decision. Ms. Karla Blomberg, 1661 Camelot, stated she was not at the meeting as one of the people directly affected. She stated she was a realtor in the area, and she has also done some developing in Fridley. As a resident of Fridley, she would much prefer to see this type of development than to see low and moderate income housing go in there. From being in the real estate business, she has seen too many areas destroyed by low and moderate income housing. She stated they do not need that in Fridley. She thought the area could bring in $150,000 homes, and it was great that Mr. Eckberg had chosen Fridley. She stated it made her angry that Fridley is considered a moder- ate income area, and they have a problem bringing in the homes and businesses because of that image. She thought it was great that the citizens are willing to work together with the City in the development of this area. Ms. Sharon Sandberg, 6436 Pierce St. N.E. , stated she was at the meeting because she had been informed by someone who came to her door that every- one's home on her block would be torn down. She felt more correct informa- tion should be sent to the people behind the Shorewood Shopping Center, so they are aware of what is going on. She stated she was in favor of con- struction. Fridley needs more children and more areas for the elderly. She was not opposed to the proposed project, but she needed more information. There is too much emotion in a lot of the statements being made, and not enough facts are coming out. Mr. Jim Jorgenson, 5730 Polk St. N.E., stated he got very disturbed when he hears that a commission feels they have the right to decide to take beautiful homes in this area and tear them down so an individual can come in and profit maybe a million dollars by developing the area. He felt the decision the governing body (the HRA) has to make has to agree with the people in the general area. If the HRA does not agree with the people, then he felt those people should take some action, and he would be strongly in favor df supporting whatever action those people took. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 12 The question was raised about the high water table in this area and whether underground garages could even be built. Mr. Commers stated it should be determined what the water table is in this area. It is possible the project is not even feasible because of a high water table. Mr. Prieditis stated he felt the water level was academic. He felt the two major objections were the height of the buildings and the possibility of present homes being removed. Maybe a committee should be formed and they could work with the people and the developer in making a decision and seeing if any compromise is possible. Mr. Kaspszak stated that a 12-story structure would be in the neighbor- hood of 1/5 of the size of the IDS towner, and they should think of it in those terr:►s. Mr. Ray McAfee, 1360 Hillcrest Dr. N.E. , stated it was high time the City Council and commission representatives gave a little thought to the feelings of the residents. They haven't heard what kind of taxes the City is going to gain, if they are even going to gain any. They need children in the schools, and they are not going to draw families with children by having $170,000 units. Mr. Edward Rush, 6028 Central Ave. N.E. , stated he felt Dennis Schneider, their councilman, should have come around to the people involved and presented this proposal so they would have known what was going on a lot earlier. Mr. Coroners stated this is the first meeting where this presentation has been made regarding this particular proposal . The neighborhood is hearing about it the same time as the HRA, and the presentation was not made prior to this evening. Mr. Schneider stated the material the residents received in the mail is the only material he has, and he had that material only about three days before it was mailed to the residents. He agreed an error was made in that the people whose property was directly affected should have been talked to personally, rather than receiving the material in the mail . He took responsibility for that error. But, he could not have told them anything that was different from what they had received in the mail . Ms. Elaine Gray, 6062 Central Ave. N.E. , stated her home was included in the redevelopment area; however, in 1981 when the redevelopment area was established, she was not notified that projects like this would come up. Do the homeowners by Sandee's Restaurant know they are also included in the redevelopment area and that this could happen to them? She stated she does not get the Fridley Sun and, therefore, does not see the public notices that are published in that paper. She felt that when personal property is involved, homeowners should be notified personally. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 13 Ms. Barb Reiland, 6068 Woody Lane, N.E. , asked if the HRA would keep in touch with the neighborhood, possibly through one person, regarding all procedures with this project. Mr. Commers stated the HRA would be happy to advise a spokesperson(s) from the neighborhood on anything that comes up on their agenda regarding this project. He asked that someone contact Mr. Boardman with the name(s) of who to contact. He stated that when the HRA makes their decision, the input from the residents will definitely be taken into consideration. 2. NORTH AREA DISTRICT: a. Request for Assistance by G. W. Paschke Mr. Coroners stated this item would be continued at the January meeting. 3. FINANCIAL: a. Check Register MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER AS PRESENTED. UPON A VOICE VOATE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Letter dated Dec. 6, 1982, from Kent Hill , Economic Development Assistant, regarding the Fridley Plaza Office Building Mr. Boardman stated he had drafted a response to Mr. Hill 's letter. He had tried to respond based on what he felt were the HRA's concerns and understanding of the project. Ms. Svendsen questioned Item #3 in Mr. Hill 's letter regarding who would be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the parking lot and driveways owned by the HRA. Mr. Boardman, in his drafted letter, had stated that "The HRA has in the past been responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of property under its ownership and will continue in its responsibility." She stated that in discussions with the City Council and the HRA, it was her understanding from Mr. Qureshi that the City would do the maintenance. Mr. Boardman stated that in the contract documents, the owners of the office building are paying the HRA "x" amount of dollars within the lease. Mr. Coroners stated that was not proper. The HRA has never thought of having to maintain the parking lot. That was never brought up or pointed out. That is a financial burden to the HRA. The HRA is not in the business HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 14 • of maintaining anything on an ongoing basis, and they should never be put in that position. • Mr. Conners also expressed concern over Item #5 in Mr. Hill 's letter regarding signage. In Mr. Boardman's drafted letter, he had responded that "Signage also falls within the realm of the City code compliance. However, the HRA is very interested in the overall signing development cf the district. We have not covered signing in our contract documents with the office building or the clinic and very much want to review any sign application with the City. The HRA will consider a letter of understanding with both prcjects requiring review by the HRA." Mr. Commers stated that somehow they had missed this point in the contract documents also, and signage is a very important point. Ms. Svendsen stated Mr. Haggerty had been very specific verbally that there would not be any signage on the outside of the building. Mr. Prieditis stated he considered signage an integral part of the building design. The HRA has not seen the working construction documents, and maybe this is the time to see the documents exactly as presented. Mr. Boardman stated he has discussed this with Mr. Haggerty, and Mr. Haggerty has stated he is willing to go with whatever signage everyone approves. Mr. Boardman stated he felt the HRA does have the control in the contract documents, although it is not specifically stated that all sign plans will be reviewed. The HRA still has plan review on all structures. Mr. Conners stated the maintenance issue and the signage issue should be discussed with Mr. Haggerty in January. He would also like Mr. Boardman to find out what the City is willing to do as far as maintenance. It was the concensus of the HRA to allow Mr. Boardman to respond to Mr. Hill 's letter with paragraphs 1, 2, 4, and 6, but to delete paragraphs 3 and 5 until this has been discussed with the City. b. Billing for Fixture Appraisals. Mr. Boardman stated he had not put this on the check register, primarily because he wanted to get a breakdown on these costs. The fixture appraisals have been done on Lennies' Laundromat, but have not yet been done on Dr. Ryans Clinic or the Battery Discount. He asked the commissioners if they wanted to authorize payment now for the bid cost of $3,700 or wait for the next check register. It was the concensus of the HRA members to authorize payment of $3,700 to The American Appraisal Company for fixture appraisals. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1982 PAGE 15 c. Lease of Hardware Building to Clothing Liquidators, Inc., for a Retail/Liquidation Operation. Mr. Boardman stated he had visited the operation in Cambridge as requested by the HRA. He stated it was a clean and good operation. Mr. Carson's financial statement was also adequate and substantial . He stated he had also included an additional clause in the lease which narrowed the lease down from an 18-month lease to a 12-month lease. M . Carson was allowed to go in with an 18-month lease with the condition that if the HRA gave a 150-day notice prior to the 12-month period, the lease could terminate in 12 months. Mr. Boardman stated this would be a weekend operation only. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. SVENDSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE DECEMBER 9, 1982, HOUSING &REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:50 P.M. Respectfully submi ted, yneVaL.." Recording Secretary i9 it, p 11- 3 = - 9 / 9 y r -15„ _ = L 7thotet j - 4oge4f.t.ear,t (�ct.ietif.k.._.- r- U ---- w20 _ �U (�, •, A.„..,wcie • 7.e./2...esz - a*•• .ef/P -lae-747 eg: ‘gr, ; 91rAZ,711.4 ._ ___, ____ _ _ _ - 1 (1 li 8erlett d'4.4 4 E 6G‘0' e .014c/. . . _ i_ /lb -. or 1, t( &Jth YLe..�u,Y VI S1L-- 6, c) C.( (...: .=,„,,Q41-C. -. ‘) am( ) t s73a Pa; I k sr /VE • 1,0 a‘ti'VV4: to II S.' We'eteti i;ea-vut. FeizthIAJZ ig .t..illt___ i' 6 M3 Cczuti-g a.sp-e_._, 44t ,.vtl4 71 4ma/ -----_ _ - __ ‘a ,r� 8 _ Ce,yt /,. G.r/-t. .N• E albf...e;-AO 40/cr C%ii k _. ax.rx, d.40. oa?o (moo / , ' Awe); Me???, _ _ __ 63Z" ' ' ' �2 — 6053 - !'_ : F //6 /a&c____ 40art, A - £ii, /L opic:4-- _ Pk.C7 � .- e._,- 4 414__, _, , a ��Ipoa(_ LJ oe ' iii-er--e- e-_- _ i 'f4S- -)/ i 7s ' flif . 7-Y;e-er"c7/, 9 /1,-2- /7 ,. •,t.e^-0 dor/ 1„,...W e c/2 7-1O . -/ I, / S ` '41I /--— / o 's /1, . ri-he` / .,�siZaterdr,Ow 40, ,o,ei , , 7 Al e :4 7 . --e--e. yi ,3,�e /. X33 y / ,sP„ :,...„..., 4)44 /__. . /33q T -4615A7 .5 f v I e.e-yr...... c..40 IP -' � � s rya �l. � c � `/ rry,.. va. -1,/,0- id-e- .e,6, cif%-$ 2...f.. 727„..4. xid.4-x ,leivit. e te IC eL& d „yeg,o,J G/aa- wovty L�Ne C i /3//a- I nn 6/a--. '` .,, // //tiVe /rl/71//i, /3�..Ciales1`�r iV £ . _ fa to/2z wQo, � IG , tr _10,.._. . 17i f , / 3 6 6 4-e rz / . _ . 6 06'3 ga. ♦/ .-4r,:‘ ,, d o Y`y'' _ or awy sY G'�• ! ,g-v - Q - -------- - r--- , ^ . is , 1 .. _ , _ ‘atoy &it.f,d V // �, "`' v // -2 7..,,,,c_ _______ Q/„..1,..,.. -2 ¼- - ha4 9 75..0_, 12f - L . sef,u, .. : 71-X-, • al )77 -f ' ' - ,A: ,1_ 4,k4e44:. t-ZA- 1 / 3 6 a al/(rie-01 - .914/C. . / . • 50/ < 01 -- --.4/c X34 4 ',/le ilikelluac-kkitA4,i G (/y,- 6,-,--dei..‹ 44,i/117 >1?-:i .>ii,L;;<- & ,1 3 6 67: .e-t.,_e_ ,..Ze!/t/, G a c y w ole,--e ` / -e-e- -11-e-e--40-dt-e /e€4.,t0Z. O61151) 5 /9-) II7}1 ( 1OiQM )2 -' ec --gc( 9f / 3a r/ADom,,,, A !- , J v4. C o (,i;c, .� GC. /6 6 / J /`�T�� rOlp d 4164406 4/4 CENTER CITY DISTRICT THE CITY OF --7;::;? HOUSING .� _. -- Lig and ' .. REDEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM ,.. :::"" f: , .::�, ::: AUTHORITY i 3 FRIDLEY "' FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MEMO NO. 83-01 DATE January 5, 1983 TO ACTION INFO. SUBJECT Housing & Redevelopment Authority X Public Improvements for Phase II Area At the December 9, 1982 meeting, a question was raised regarding the office building contract documents and certain responsiblities of the HRA regarding public improvements in the Phase II area of Center City. Because of these questions, I have some concerns that the HRA feels uncomfortable with the overall project development and specifically with their cash flow projections with these projects. I feel that it is extremely important to discuss all of these issues and to clarify all aspects of the Phase II development. At the January 13, 1983 meeting I will have the engineering/public works, building inspection and financing staff to discuss with you the different aspects of the projects. Interdesign will also be in attendance to discuss their final design proposal with cost estimates on the Plaza. With the Clinic nearing completion and the Office Building underway, it will be important to move quickly over the next several months on those projects that rely on the HRA. I am attaching a listing of the public projects related to Phase II and their status to date. I have discussed the maintenance of the HRA property on which the parking lot is to be located with Nasim Qureshi , City Manager, and have reached a tentative agreement on maintenance. This agreement is in the agenda for your action. I have also included, for your review, the information that you requested at the December 9, 1982 meeting. JLB/de THE CITY OF--c2er . HOUSING € ,�. I � Agiiii end •' REDEVELOPMENT ._ \,•. AUTHORITY ii:: :.... -••' c 3 i:: FRIDLEY _•. • December 20, 1982 Tim Signorelli 4010'°455 Columbia Park Clinic 3620 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55418 Re: Clarification of "Contract for Private Development" Dear Mr. Signorelli: A question has been raised by the City of Fridley on the issuance of sign permits within the Center City Project on those signs that fall under its jurisdiction, (Chapter 214 of the Fridley City Code - signing visible to the outside public). The Housing & Redevelopment Authority position on this issue is that all signage visible to the outside public, by contract documents, requires approval by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority as part of its plan review process. Since outside signage is such a key to the integral design of the entire district, we feel it is essential to clarify this both with the City and the developer. This review would be required prior to any application for permit to the City of Fridley. Please keep this in mind when planning your timetable for providing signage for your facility. I think that you will agree on the importance of this matter in providing a - quality area for your development. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 571-3450. Sincerely, /ESPonisc FQCA4 C1-/A'l L " EC lvEO Y /�NC�E — /�4. r` ONDt=e3TEA)0 Co 2t"Sitit'DLA.CC- JERROLD L. BOARDMAN, AND yAdEAuo "RP_Ca1.eti1 Executive Director Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority 90 C-82-84 THE CITY OF 5„ HOUSING >ØiIic.and • ,L1 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYE ' k : FRIDLEY December 20, 1982 Mark Haggerty 6441 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Re: Clarification of "Contract for Private Development" Dear Mr. Haggerty: A question has been raised by the City of Fridley on the issuance of sign permits within the Center City Project on those signs that fall under its jurisdiction, (Chapter 214 of the Fridley City Code - signing visable to the outside public). The Housing and Redevelopment Authority position on this issue is that all signage visable to the outside public, by contract documents, requires approval by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority as part of its plan review process. Since outside signage is such a key to the integral design of the entire district, we feel it is essential to clarify this both with the City and the developer. This review would be required prior to any application for permit to the City of Fridley. Please keep this in mind when planning your timetable for providing signage for your facility. I think that you will agree on the importance of this matter in providing a quality area for your development. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 571-3450. Sincerely, "TgLaEO To AbEic ons i//F3 glIS 4/6 w, rN ERROLD L. BOARDMAN Executive Director Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority C-82-84 80E •L ASE 7D A REEM?lT This Agreement, Dated as of this '.P4h day of Septemler' , 1982, by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley (hereinafter called the 'Agency") and Fridley Plaza Office Building Partnership (hereinafter called the 'Redeveloper') Witnesseth, that WINFWAS, on or before the date hereof the Agency and the Redeveloper have entered into a "Contract for Private Redeveopment" regarding certain real property located in the Center City Redevelopment Project in the City of Fridley, pursuant to which the Authority is to acquire certain property as conditioned said 'Contract for Private Redevelopment' (hereinafter referred to as 'the Contract') . WHEREAS, it is contemplated that pursuant to said "Contract" the Redeveloper will construct an office building containing approximately 35,000 square feet upon the redevelopment property. WHHtFAS, the Redeveloper has entered into that certain Loan Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1982 (the 'Loan Agreement") , with the City of Fridley (the "City") pursuant to which the City has loaned to the Redeveloper the proceeds of the Bonds issued pursuant to that certain Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1982 (the 'Indenture") , between the City and FIM Marquette National Bank (the "Mortgagee") . wows, pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, there has been created a "Lease Fund" (as defined in the Indenture) . MW, THEREFORE, the parties to this agreement, in consideration of the promises, convenants and agreenents made by each to the other, do hereby agree as follows: 1. The 'Agency" agrees to lease to the redeveloper the following described property (hereinafter referred to as the 'Leasehold Property") for the purpose of the parking of vehicles associated with to development of the redevelogrent property: lbe Southerly 12.8 feet. of Lot Six along with all of Lots 7-11, Block Two (2) , Rees' Addition to Fridley Park together with the Easterly 7.63 feet of the vacated alley lying westerly of and adjacent to the above described property and the northerly 6.8 feet of lot 2 and all of lot 1, Block Five (5) Rees' Addition to Fridley Park together with the Easterly 7.63 feet of the vacated alley lying westerly of and adjacent to the above described property; described herein and that portion of the vacated 64th Avenue that lies between the above described property in Block Five (5) and Block Too (2) , Rees' Addition to Fridley Park. 2. The 'Agency' agrees to build and pay for all of the landscaping, paving, curbing and other costs related to a 166 car parking lot adjacent to the redevelopment property. The Agency shall pay any and all costs related to maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting, repairing and taxes (if any) of the above described property during the term of this lease. 3. The 'Redeveloper shall pay to the Agency $800.00 per month for the lease of the above described property and intorovements starting on a date no later than two (2) years fran the date of the certificate of completion, Schedule C of the 'Contract'. These payments shall be made on the first day of each month and shall continue for a period of 360 months at which tine the 'Redeveloper' would have the option to purchase the 'Leasehold Property' for a sum of $100,000. If in the event the 'Redeveloper does not exercise the option to purchase the 'Leasehold Property', the lease shall continue at $800.00 per month for an additional 240 months. In the event of default, the 'Agency' shall notify the Redeveloper and Mortgagee of said default. In the event the Redeveloper fails to cure said default, the Mortgagee, its successors or assigns has the right to cure said default and the Agency agrees to accept as full payment of this lease frau the Mortgagee, its successors or assigns the interest earned from tine to tine on the 'Lease Fund'. If there is a deficiency between the earnings on the 'Lease Fund' and the lease payment, the preceeding does not prohibit the Agency from collecting the deficiency fran the Redeveloper. 4. The above parking lot and any adjacent City parking lot shall be open for joint use by clients, employees, agents and the general public making use of the,Redeveloper's office building and the City of Fridley's Civic Center. All notices and deliveries required or permitted by this Agreement shall be given in the manner provided in the 'Contract'. IN WrINESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this instrument to be executed as of the date first above written. TOE HO[JSIN3 AND RED } •FrEgic AUTHORITY IN AND •••• TH CITY CF" S. .► « .i moan By Executive Director FRIDLEY BUI ING P-4/pr IP BY �� Pa And By Partner — •- ---I I •-- - • 133W.S,ip 4 • 1 :• am.. Siiiik. • - 11:,....-........ .'""h L `�. el".W" t `) I I I �ra�� II \JI •+_ 411 0 410 (!) . • w . O 0 0 - ' . C 0 ' c� • • HHHIIHIr . ithallikT) I I II � roil ii . G� ; . . 1!IS:IN ; ,,1I • 1Ir- o gall • 0114 IIII �I O — 103 1f f V '� III i_AMI 1 Oa Mg 41:41 •. i!IP • .. , . . . . • s A . . , _ .)..4._. . , . , , ,-„..?...11. _Klatt! ia - , A*. tiom-.-1.m. , • - I' '-m- ritaiblikl°14111P minnows/ _ .,,...9.46—dbillk _ • on-ini..b .AOIALINA1_111i-,14111,- iL 10111110011111&111111111141-1 p • . mop,...flrairwr..41,.....,,,,,rffi,....c:„....--.4, - •mf.,„....,..40 ,,,,,.. . , ..„.. . lia. i.......wail. ,,,, .,• i V' . . •• • iontinv-iarro f..- i''' — •--._ff -r . • ' . . 0 ' • ial.a --74. ,. ,„ • • • . . . . . {,....:00,. . -, . - - .lirog-: . . . . - . diliztAii • 0.f.---fig :1.i,. tr. • ' age 4 JitheirM4le:;:t I, • .:` _ . 4 ' 1 at a . II I J '• i• :: •, L _1i I 4 �IX C i !•I '1iiIs f s�- W •',....'" ...,:‘,S.11. •••••k47.••••••••••7•••• , ,• Nit. 1 °)1,1..‘4,-,-. .. ' . f!. \1\ : . . • .• •'- - I 1 •.LTi ✓..t*7' t j ' ' •■ Iii • `'e 1 , . 1. • I :I ( (. I t, I • OVOH 31IAH3S '9AV AIM FRIDLEY CITY CENTER Site Development Costs (Parking Lot & Street Improvements) Item Total Office/City Hall Parking Lot: $140,000 Complete; bituminous paving w/class 5 base, concrete curbing, bryan red rock seal coat, lighting and irrigation Firemans Parking Lot: 20,000 Complete; bituminous paving w/class 5 base, concrete curbing bryan red rock seal coat, lighting and irrigation 64th Street: 55,000 Utilities Sewer-Water: (completed cost; $19,000) RESOLUTION NO. HRA 1 - 1983 A RFSOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED LAYOUT OF PROJECT AREA II WITHIN THE CENTER CITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority is the responsible Agency for implementation of the Center City Redevelopment District; and WHEREAS, as part of the Center City District, the HRA entered into contract documents with Columbia Park Properties and Fridley Plaza Office Building Partnership for development of two separate projects within Phase II of the Center City District; and WHEREAS, the HRA has reviewed the overall layout of the two projects and has given plan layout approval in relationship to the Clinic and Office buildings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA: 1. That the final plan layout for Phase II is approved for implementation. 2. That the staff is authorized to procced with the parking lot, lighting and related landscape improvements associated with office building/City Hall parking lot. 3. That the staff is authorized to proceed with the construction of 64th Avenue N.E. as per Resolution HRA 1-1982. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1982. LARRY OJMMERS, CHAIRMAN MUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ATTEST: JERROLD L. BOARDMAN - EXECJTIVE DIRECTOR 2/2/8/31 RESCLUTION ND. BRA 2 - 1983 A RESOLUTION PETITIONING THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR PARRiNG IDT AND RELATED LAND6CAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CENIE 2 CITY-FRIE EY PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING PRaiErr WHEREAS, the Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority is the responsible Agency for implementation of the Center City Redevelopment District; and WHEREAS, as part of the Center City Redevelopment District, it is the intent of the Authority to do certain public improvements in order to generate development and provide for the health, safety and general welfare of the City of Fridley; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA: 1. That the Authority hereby petitions the City Council for Parking Lot and related landscape improvements associated with the Fridley Plaza Office Building project. 2. That the Authority request a waiving of its right to Public Hearing for the improvement allowed under the normal procedures set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. 3. That the Authority agrees to furnish funds for initial payments of those improvements as petitioned above but reserves right to negotiate with City for final distribution of funds. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1983. LARRY C)MMERS, CHAIRMAN HOUSIW AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ATTEST: JERROLD L. BOARDMAN - E'XECXJTIVE DIRECTOR 2/2/6/30 Agreement of Cooperation Between the City of Fridley and the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1983, by and between the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the City) and the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment authority, a public corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, having its offices in the City of Fridley (hereinafter referred to as the HRA). WHEREAS, The HRA will be constructing a 166 car parking lot as part of the development of the Fridley Plaza Office Building within Phase II of the Center City Project. WHEREAS, This parking lot will include blacktop, curbing, striping and any landscaping associated with its construction. WHEREAS, The HRA will be doing work on the existing City parking lot to ensure a better match and coordination of the two parking areas. WHEREAS, The City will benefit from the development of this parking lot through the provision of a new improved parking facility with shared parking opportunities to increase the City's functional capacity at key times. WHEREAS, The City previously maintained the entire portion of property being developed for the parking facility. NOW THEREFORE, For and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency whereof are hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto; the City and HRA do hereby agree as follows: 1. That the HRA will provide a 166 car parking facility which will be open for joint use by the City of Fridley and the Fridley Plaza Office Building. 2. That the City shall maintain as a part of its regular maintenance of the Civic Center property, the property owned by the HRA on which the parking lot is being constructed for as long as the HRA shall own said property. (Maintenance including: sweeping, plowing, striping, repairing and lighting of the parking lot; and mowing and trimming of the landscape area.) 3. This agreement shall terminate upon transfer of the property from the ownership of the HRA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this instrument to be duly executed as of this day and year first above written. City of Fridley By Its Mayor, William J. Nee And Its Manager, Nasim M. Qureshi Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Fridley By Its Chairperson, Lawrence R. Commers And Its Executive Director, Jerrold L. Boardman 3/0/24/6 TME CITY OF -77777) HOUSING ` "" " Iiiiiiiiiir and - ,� ... I ; :: REDEVELOPMENTiii ..MEMORANDUM AUTHORITY =. ; - E600CMS "'� k :: 3RIDLEY � "" FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MEMO NO. 83-02 DATE January 5, 1983 TO ACTION INFO. SUBJECT Housing & Redevelopment Authority X InterDesign, Inc. Final Plaza Design Proposal Meeting (Jerry Boardman, Nasim Qureshi, John Flora, Mark Burch, Darrel Clark, Jim Robin- son, Roger Martin, Harold Skjelbostad) We met with InterDesign on January 4, 1983 to discuss the final Plaza design for presentation to the HRA at the January 13, 1983 meeting. The design submitted incorporated the ideas and discussion of the HRA meeting on September 23, 1982. (See attached summary of that meeting). We reviewed in detail , the proposal and the pre- liminary cost projections which were submitted. I'm including copies of the final design proposal of the Plaza for your review. The costs estimates are being revised based on discussions at the above noted meeting and will be available at the January 13, 1983 meeting. JLB/de 1409 Willow Street Record of Meeting Minneapolis.Minnesota 55403 612/8717979 lterDeSign Project: Fridley City Center No.491.3 Present: See below. Purpose: Meeting with H.R.A. and City Staff, September 23, 1982. Copies to: Jerry Boardman. Date: September 23, 1982 Present: Jerry Boardman, Naism Qureshi,John Flora,Jim Robinson, Action By all of City of Fridley; H.R.A. Members: 1) Elmars Priedietis, 2) Carolyn Svendsen and 3) Duane Prairie;and Harold Skjelbostad and Roger Martin of InterDesign Inc. DISCUSSION AND DECISIONS: A. Plaza Design Alternatives 1. Roger Martin summarized the design alternatives developed in response to the staff critique of July 30, 1982. Essentially,four options for the Plaza were presented primarily dealing with alterations in the nature and form of the focal point and views from University Avenue. 2. The option which included a fountain on top of the raised area was selected for further refinement. It was agreed that the fountain should be composed of permanent vertical elements which would provide visual interest when the fountain is turned off. The vertical elements would recall the street furniture image system. The final direction would ex- plore use of flower beds on grade re-enforcing the land form. The plan dated 9/23/82 which illustrates a more generous event place plus ex- panded hillside step-sitting terraces adjacent to the building was felt to be in the proper direction. 3. Naism Qureshi wanted to have the potential maintenance of the fountain clarified. It was noted that weekly cleaning of the filters was necessary plus spring and fall pump maintenance. 4. The question of moving the Fridley billboard was discussed, but it was agreed not to find another location at this time. B. Integrated Signage Liahtina System 1. Harold Skjelbostad presented a potential image system which recalled the tower and entry portico of City Hall. Vertical members would be composed of standard metal elements. The kiosk element could incor- porate a phone or be used as a sales unit with Dutch doors. —continued. 1409 Willow Street Record of Meeting Minneapolis.Minnesota 55403 612/871 7979 Page 2 (continued) InterDesign Project: Fridley City Center No.491.3 Action By: 2. It was agreed that the general direction was worth refining and defining in more specific locations. 3. Naism Qureshi requested that other systems built be illustrated. H. Skjelbostad InterDesign will provide information. C. Office Building 1. Mark Haggerty, developer, presented the revised office site plan prepared by B.W.B.R. The plan showed an expanded north- west entry related to the Plaza and an emphasized south entry related to the clinic. 2. It was agreed that InterDesign should work closely with B.W.B.R. H. Skjelbostad to define the site work immediately adjacent to the building. Jerry indicated that even though the City would be implementing this development, the developer would be charged for the costs. 3. It was noted that screening of transformers must be fully accomplished. D. 64th Avenue 1. InterDesign's suggestion of a drop-off at the Plaza was discussed. It was noted that because the Plaza area was tight and that future traffic would be slow, no drop-off should be provided. E. Topographic Survey 1. Jerry indicated that the City would be obtaining the necessary J. Boardman survey from 5th Street to the Frontage Road locating all major existing site elements. It appears it will be available within one month. F. Schedule 1. It was agreed not to prepare further detail plans until the topo. survey is available. This would allow more accurate design and cost estimation. 2. Ideally, the final design would be reviewed by H.R.A. in late December with the Phase I work going out for bids in February 1983. Construction would then proceed in early spring 1983. RBM/la ttt -I.r 4. • 4. 11.11.1.11.11,x • 1,.:!.,•• .r.. ...„ ..4:�•.. -• ...... • 4:... r. ,•'.j• ••a•• .11 .,,:‘• --:..• g 1.. ..�•., WWII I •. `• I i i i i 11i. -.a i iv 1 k....-.,-.. ...) . . • /---j-'- --"1-- .. .• ....... _iiiirc___, . 1 - m s! =111 =t01711111 I1113101111I- ---- - 1 . r••.• ..i.� ../" . .. r ..:,. .p �.111 ;/ '? al ,, ew , Asp. 1 Attimeihismarkia.meahlislAll we Aff= yr1141,1111-All =tat=IR1 $U1}- 1:•0u.! 4 . . Ift `= Y y -111141 71 1'151 +�1 I . , i .1! • . ••• C..• iz•� 'H{ .i► : iit, . ,V4. `'t -• til - � a_ , „�•”I • WritirigNaptaltrA10.1!*4•Ltn;41 ( • ll�� i �� 'rn .�,i, . • — — .4.: iir.t.', 1 %Hp 1�s. � _� ter ,•� 4,7 ,, . IIIIIWk. • 4 sp ' �j no�s•1.4140 S.; - r= -: 1 r . 1� . si- � .. • S � I:.\ tam •g• 1 .3—..t,.-4----- Com_. m.• 11�.a;1b.io _ .a .r.:.;',4...;. 1 _- ampi f it .1111 au, c! is • ,I I s44 ,�l6 + tryr��UI/ lip, ems-' . - -.-- -- 6--- , , 14'. 1, 4,4A OP 'Al.,. -: *._... . 0411 --II IV •n�. f s • P s:_41il: t'a . is 1 • �sv AIME,"r - l 41. I. �, a r' `a-^ 3 • `% - _ .46 y �\ w .r 1/ . �; dsti�.w ov:A "� �J ei 1 (O f h+\ g1 ifil tigaillikW1 ee' 0,04, L___= • rAmigear e • • • 1 • !lian4CI. '4131.C) . • ed .. . . . -\ C • . . • • - . . .. . •.......___. : .. • . .. • . • .. • • • - GYM 3MIA!!3S"AAV 71UNn 1 i Hili)I flt I i ' 1— - - . I I I . i • I • j I • I 1 I I -. I ITII-Ill-t----itjinllg 1 • ...__-s . 1 I 1 , 111 i ! pli,:,,,,:,, i. I i L J , e, / a t ftm1111 ii - k w ii E3 I iigiEll h 1 iETLJ ! ' ILD 1i • i i 1 1 11 it 4 • . , I 1 `a`r 11 Cn I Gs:=t _ _w` )! . �� 1 NfMraw s .......;,..-.5„,—,_„,,, i —tanMr.00N i . �� _ ; • Pr' aomi It - III ii II i I f11 M • e� ;r±r 1 �' S 0 g jiiiijiiii,iiiiijiiiiliiiii m • • 1r u m'-''' ---- ..11 _....., , ....__ 4 .— ---- .ii \ 41=4... --.. 6 0 I -.-i - 3 � i i i� _ 1 2 e— 11 Mr a ,....__.-=1 legircr: -a .. ___. r.,.__ __„... =.... ..,, ____,_ , .. _ . _... ____,_ , ......... _ .a..f...---)...4 -= —rsosoc=Mk r... .iiii .....6V:=", ==...........-.----.•••• ---i . I _ • Ii I . • i Q 1 -� 11 _._______________-4,m i . 4 { • 1 ', -----i , ._ _ 4 ti % . • t at' is '4 ,4 . 1 r . 1, 4 rte-- _ 1111111121111101.11.111111.1 .; - ; 11111111.1.1.11.111.1.11111610 \ '‘----Mlii". I- I. .... s 0 • • ' i V • • _. C•40e. I) Ii II �/ \ REsa.UrION ND. BRA 4 — 1983 RES LUTION APPROVING 1HE CONOTROMON FLANS OF TIE TICAL CLINIC BUILDING AS SUBIITiED BY CCLUrBIA PARR PROPERTIES WHEREAS, Columbia Park Properties has submitted construction plans for the development of a Medical Clinic Building, and WHEREAS, the "Contract for Private Redevelopment" requires the Fridley Housing Authority to approve the construction plans, if in the reasonable discretion of the authority that: 1. The construction plans conform to the terms and conditions of the Contract. 2. The construction plans conform to the terms and condtions of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. The construction plans conform to the all applicable Federal, State, Local Laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. 4. The construction plans are adequate to provide for the construction of minimum improvements. 5. The construction plans do not provide for expenditures in excess of the funds available to the redeveloper for the construction of the minimum improvements. 6. No event or default has occured. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESO VED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Fridley that the Authority approves the construction plans as submitted and in the reasonable discretion of the Authority, the above stated conditions have been met. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIILEY THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1983. LARRY COMNERS, CHAIRMAN HOUSING AND REDEVIIAMENT AUTHORITY ATIESP: JERROLD L. BOARCMAN EXECUTIVE DIRECIOR 2/2/8/26 RESOLUTION M). BRA 5 — 1983 RES(IL7rION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PIANS OF THE FRIDLEY' PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING AS SUBMITTED BY THE FRIDLEY PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING PAIS WHEREAS, Fridley Plaza Office Building Partnership has submitted construction plans for the development of an Office Building, and WHEREAS, the "Contract for Private Redevelopment" requires the Fridley Housing Authority to approve the construction plans, if in the reasonable discretion of the authority that: 1. The construction plans conform to the terms and conditions of the Contract. 2. The construction plans conform to the terms and condtions of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. The construction plans conform to the all applicable Federal, State, Local Laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. 4. The construction plans are adequate to provide for the construction of minimum improvements. 5. The construction plans do not provide for expenditures in excess of the funds available to the redeveloper for the construction of the minimum improvements. 6. No event or default has occured. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Fridley that the Authority approves the construction plans as submitted and in the reasonable discretion of the Authority, the above stated conditions have been met. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1983. LARRY COMMERS, CHAIRMAN HWSING AND REDEVELOMENT AUTHORITY ATTEST: JERROLD L. BOARTMAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 2/2/8/27 HERRICK & NEWMAN. P.A. VIRGIL C.HERRICK ATTORNEYS AT LAW 6279 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. DAVID P.NEwMAN FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA 55432 571-3950 December 17, 1982 • Mr. G. Stanley Rischard LAW OFFICES OF G. STANLEY RISCHARD Attorney at Law Suite 925 Dain Tower Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: Fridley Housing - Hardel Condemnation Dear Mr. Rischard: This letter is to confirm our recent telephone conversation wherein we discussed the possibility of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority making a partial payment on the Hardel house in lieu of depositing 75% of the offering price with the Anoka County Clerk of Court. I indicated my approval for a paynent of 75% of this amount, with the provision that Mr. Hardel could continue to remain in the house for 90 days, rent free. This offer is made on the condition that the H.R.A. obtain valid title to this property. It is my understanding that we would use an agreement similar to an agreement that was used on the conveyance of the garage; that is that the final payment would be adjusted if the commissioners or court award more or less than the partial payment. You advised me that you would check to determine the balance on the contract for deed. Please advise me when you have this information. I would also renew my request to receive copies of your appraisal reports on both the house and garage as soon as you have them. Sincerely, 4(g4- Virgil C. Herrick VCH:kao 1: Jerrold Boardman REPORT FROM BILL VON KLUG CONCERNING PROGRESS OF RELOCATION OF BUSINESSES IN THE FRIDLEY PLAZA NORTH AREA DISTRICT THE CITY OF L-J HOUSING , and %, .,. , .. Alsw.m. REDEVELOPMENT ;:4.12/1EMORANDUM ..♦ ::r :� .:: AUTHORITY : ' • FRIDLEY •••� �� `.. FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MEMO NO. 83_03 DATE January 7, 1983 TO ACTION INFO. SUBJECT Housing & Redevelopment Authority X Proposal from Jerry Paschke. As was discussed at the November 18, 1982 meeting, I have met with Mr. Paschke and have run some bond estimates on the existing and proposed facilities which are included in the North Area Tax Increment District. Mr. Paschke is requesting assistance in two areas: 1. Help in acquiring fill material for the Phase II proposal at 7920 University and a proposed project at 79th and Main St. 2. Assistance in the reduction of special assessments within the "University Industrial Park Plat". I have provided a breakdown of the estimated costs and bond projections with this proposal. If the HRA is to sell bonds on the existing structures, we should develop decuments with Mr. Paschke which sets minim tax payments on those properties. JLB/de • iI • • / �,'•li IL I 81ST.\ . ' I is itt • .� ., — _ iso . _— )Ie/ / .65 /p. F n5, L \I c / 141..6 1 1 0. I. / /I:. • 0J • I I rJ 1 fr9• ;. N 1• 0 - 1 COM . . $ 66' • M-1 IND. ' COM, •,,. ; „; ,o' IA'' I•.1 .... ` _ EX 15TI NCO. -,23•1 O. � st• N0 - nFCA RE c% ' .....• (1- .� o O � E' 2 0,�ti Ni 10 1 I •••,, 2 ti o j til • is t1l'1 111D. • • -'C . M-1 IND. COM. ' _ 2i2• I 2.2' 200:_11 _ y. --I-- •1 ' Vc- 1 ` I _ •"'' I ' • I • I ` r� I e o O o ' I sl ` ., . '0 1 _.. -435= — - —1� �'• �_, !SSE---- : — — ,,,n .v Assts. ince.c �tquest&d, I ..- �Peovos 0 - Tit= =� i I ti I ``. CAO V¢E :�3 1 X� • •� -7. . . . M-2 UJ. 4 _ I —esu. i; M-1 11D. • ' 'o `\ _COM: .. ' 1 iI h1.1 IND.s, -_ - __ _ ._- ..• 2:1 .... 2S - -- � • ' •2 Le_ __ /_„ _212I - _Y00__ -y ? (1 A tP.4 ,vs8 A - II, ,�Ao 7 �A/ N s 9 '' hi-1 IND. ° - 5 ). ►4s 1r 7 1.18. •• h1-2 lND. �. ta® , I 1. - 1, ,•+ I . • tt1.1 INV., COh1. 435 1I . •1.� _ `y ,e o _.._-.-1-...-.. - :.2Z- 4...��.v ''Q :v, �,: rt -- 435 I — - '£ths ,.�• �- u —s...1.i -- i, I M 2 5 .( � .. .� �` `� ^ �r • ` ij23s fNA? i( � 8 t. • ,-) ---r 1-<-CI !-t r . • 1 to orf -• • 118 •Assi owAet�Qgvireeei '7=' • I 1 7911 Ranchers Road (Building Completed) 17,740 Sq. Ft. Building M.V. 45,224 Sq. Ft. Land Value Total MV Total AV Base AV $275,000 $69,334 $344,334 $148,063 $7,400 TIF Assessed Value $140,663 X 60% $ 84,397 @ 110 mills TIF Tax $ 9,283 Potential Bond -$52,072 (No Assistance Needed) 7920 University Avenue N.E. Phase I Building (Under Construction) 22,400 Sq. Ft. Building M.V 77,549 Sq. Ft. Land MV Total MV Total AV Base AV $350,000 $117,000 $470,000 $202,100 $11 ,920 TIF Assessed Value $190,180 X 60% $114,180 @110 mills TIF Tax $ 12,551 Potential Bond -$72,975 (No Assistance Needed) Phase II (Building Permit Applied for) 28,800 Sq. Ft. Building AV I 133,451 Sq. Ft. Land MV Total MV Total AV Base AV $450,000 $200,176. $650,176 $279,575 $27,480 TIF Assessed Value $252,095 X 60% $151 ,257 @ 110 mills TIF Tax $ 16,638 Potential Bond - $104,624 Assistance Required a) Soil fill material 3,000 cubic yards @$4.00 $12,000 b) Special Assessment assistance from $24,000 per Acre to $15,000 per Acre $9,000 @ 3.064 Acre $27,572 Total Assistance $39,572 LOT 5, BLOCK 4 (No Building Plans at this Time) Potential Building $30,000 Land Area $84,000 Potential Bond $91,000 Assistance Requested: (a) fill material of 15,000 Cu Yds @ $4.00 - $60,000 (b) assessment assistance of 9,000 per Acre @ $1.93 - $17,365 Total Assistance- $77,365 If assistance is given prior to building committment based on bond funds from previous buildings, we should cover these expenditure with a per- formance agreement. MOORE LAKE DISTRICT TME CITY OF l_— HOUSING jraw...... and -a, _ I :. REDEVELOPMENT ' MEMORANDUM . AUTHORITY =�� E b FRIDLEY ••-. FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MEMO NO. 83_0,4 DATE January 7, 1983 TO ACTION INFO. SUBJECT Housing & Redevelopment Authority X Project Proposal by Dick Mochinski at Old Central and Rice Creek Road I have met several times in the past month with Mr. Dick Reiersgord who is representing Mr. Mochinski in the development of his property at Old Central and Rice Creek Road. At that time we were approximately $300,000 short on the project and felt that it was not feasible because of the low market values that were being suggested. Last week they suggested some changes to their market value range which may make cash flow estimates more acceptable for HRA assistance. We are still evaluating the project for its feasibility and will have the information available for HRA discussion at the January 13, 1983 meeting. JLB/de 117.73) i L____________________j yd 'i efl:-'.;- wT -7 -_• —2--- ---_ —44af_- 4iISS St 4440 5o 50 (G2s�13N (.- ,2, I �� ,!� ,1s f' • /•a • 13 8 /376 ` /400 1428 1442 /464 I !4g�� c> _ 1 21 !i» �sC) (4i-o) 360) (iso) (too) (,L.'. I ,i: (6 (43C" .ti /.. M •• tis i 64174 •� I � r Rwr s (3�0) _ /j - // , 7 J i ...S - 7 1 64J sc' lids (U +t iu p. ( ; ! `4 4 b N0. 88 6441 „a - 3 1 3 1 l 700) �e — M - r -e IVS *BPr a'e I � f.420 �� 21 (2., +Zl /9 `i .560, ; fceo) (400) 320) tit .r a t `, 91 . A .1 r4 T ��_-�, /4 /_ � ., v 5 �- _T, 4 2 ; = - 3i 4, . ;1 Vis' -1 147 .N �,, i 14 89 M- -4.4 ii- �� ;*:: 373 '13145 1403 ' I 1487 Q b' M �+ s l.. 1 1 ey1443/¢$3 J+/1fI! ; N� e Li11 1 f! )• ss „c j j , t• _ TH AVE. N4. . . fEy,4L b '139/ i..15 11/4: ` , /lf ,f. t A:f . .ec r f. -Jr f / , 630 A,' y,� -1Z^ /304 ' "Op /4Z6 /44l/4So 4• ��4 r 1 ss 6 400 .'4.4') 134+0 Ole Oa* (regi Vm 1 o I f t ` (e I)'•,4 9'.';) (8 4 : k �s 370 ,,,,, ,�� our) ' l t1440-; ", Sc aftEK : ' 43A..,,, ,„.,,,,.. , iito ___ • ..fig, _ po , , `.�a7� yy ,r..r..... • 9 63 30 ` /"7 `` :; _._ V °1 r' • . .i !firr . , .,...1-, :irN /WOO '34s V, . 603) 61401 (,160/ 'e4, 0/0O) Oor ; ((4°J As 14 4 rEARACE �$ _ ,a‘. 11 4 144 t r . ... b % , 1x17 % 14 --� ; {i. .7r.it �✓ y 6 4 0 0 -..., 6300 1 • I i W 4 • • 1, - 1410 1321 « • /fir se 3/5 %'"c . - - x 1425 1441 1i6r 14q 1 a ;Sol — _ tr '; RiCE CREEK ROAD "( i. Oi P._ 4 li,/ ls„ AOD. use I "-_ GZt1 - 1v •• 110 0 1 , +30 •_ (.211 47 - - j370 i 141 0 k i r.; 10 ;i . M GZg3 ' % �� I �� . _ ,�� .. �iQ01ECTTer15 z �--- , �jr„v L. .tile 2.of � (fGs'� 1 � 2 .F1—.-.4-, � `/- (.Z•7/ 1 u.....n _ . J . • r , 4 6275 .cz 4-1 .. iii 0.,4r.„."::. u ry m• ti � I , 0q X27 X __�:_Pi OeoPP:6 o M � . AUD. 19 ��; *.. - - — ,-� L1* X z40 or ~w�/- 1"- 4 6 2 17 ,,46 1 A �c 3. a 4 ,a 20 :.zi SUB. / - to - 2� 6 36 x btd 3 .� l G. Ite -tom - - rte`es ---- - A- ' Za V F 6�As dit l iht j • A IR. MEil9/ �- t- - - - •. . �• ..e.1 44,41r1 J THE CITY OF --- aiiir HOUSINGS o i .. LA re and .,. ; •. REDEVELOPMENT '.MEMORANDUM AUTHORITY E•••••• •.: FRIDLEY �� ' FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MEMO NO. 83-05 DATE January 7, 1983 TO ACTION INFO. SUBJECT MOORE LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Housing & Redevelopment Authority X We held a special meeting as was suggested by the HRA at the December 9, 1982 meeting. The meeting was held on January 4, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. I feel that it was very successful in that some compromises were made by both parties and we had posi- tive feelings coming out of the meeting. We will be working with the architect to see if we can shift the towers further to the north, away from direct acquisition of the five houses to the south. I will discuss this with you in more detail at the January 13, 1983 meeting. I have tennatively discussed bringing this item back to the HRA at their February meeting for action. JLB/jh MEtT$MC. bq Moo es LAKE NEwwdoam000 WEo. ,JANUARY LI 11483 Name Address Phone Elaine Gray 6062 Central Avenue N.E. 571-3933 Frances Rush 6028 Central Avenue N.E. 571-3607 Ed Rush 6028 Central Avenue N.E. 571-3607 Mr. L. Wilke 6061 Central Avenue N.E. 571-1442 Irene Nelson 6065 Central Avenue N.E. 571-0882 Leo Nelson 6065 Central Avenue N.E. 571-0882 Lou Wilke 6061 Central Avenue N.E. 571-1442 Ion K. Swanson 6064 Woody Lane N.E. 571-0775 Lorraine Nelson 6080 Central Avenue N.E. 571-0616 Daniel G. Nelson 6080 Central Avenue N.E. 571-0616 Erland Ekberg 2140 Spruce Trail 588-6388 Dennis Schneider City Council Jim Robinson Planning Staff Jackie Lentz 6053 Central Avenue N.E. JEt*T 1oAROMAO NRA EYcc. l7IA.ECTOR RESOLUTION NU. HILA 3 - 1983 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAZA PLAN FOR PHASE II OF THE CENTER CITY DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS WHEREAS, the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority is the responsible Agency for implementation of the Center City Redevelopment District; and WHEREAS, as pert of the contract documents with the Fridley Plaza Office Building Partnership, the BRA has committed to the development of a plaza located south of the Fridley Civic Center for the overall enhancement of the total Phase II Development; and WHEREAS, the design of this plaza is being done by Interdesign, Inc. who was selected by the HRA through a design competition within guidelines set by the BRA; and WHEREAS, Interdesign within the guidelines of their contract with the HRA has submitted preliminary and final plaza designs for approval by the HRA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA: 1. That the final plaza plan is approved for the development of final construction plans. 2. That the staff is authorized to enter into contract with Interdesign for the completion of those construction plans. 3. That the construction of the plaza does not exceed $300,000 , including contingencies, as per final plan approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1982. LARRY CDMMERS, CHAIRMAN HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ATTEST: JERROLD L. BOAREMAN - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FRIDLEY CITY CENTER InterDesign Inc. Project No. 491.3 Revised: 1/6/83 Site Development Costs(Plaza) Item Quantity Unit Price Total Demolition: $ 15,000 Grading: grading of imported soil 3,042 cu. yd. @ $ 2.00 cu. yd. 6,000 importation and grading of topsoil 1,018 cu. yd. @ 8.00 cu. yd. 8,144 Utilities: drain - in event gathering place 50 LF @ 40.00 LF 2,000 pipe 150 LF @ 25.00 LF 3,750 Plaza -- broom-finished concrete: 18,300 SF @ 2.50 SF 45,750 steps 1,650 SF @ 3.00 SF 5,775 Walls -- form board: 1,450 LF @ 20.00 FF 81,492 Lighting: wall lights -- steps 16 @ 450.00 EA 7,200 Kim--LLFI - Bollards -- Kim - B-30-410 4 @ 571.00 EA 2,284 (High pressure sodium) Bollards -- metal: 26 @ 100.00 EA 2,600 Concrete Brick Pavers: Terra-Lok - "Madrid" 3,400 SF @ 3.75 SF 12,750 Parking lot - strip pavers 56 SF @ 3.75 SF 210 Layout and Staking: 5,000 Plant Materials: Austrian Pine -- 5' 2 @ 115.00 EA 230 Austrian Pine -- 9' 6 @ 385.00 EA 2,310 Colorado Blue Spruce -- 5' 11 @ 149.00 EA 1,639 Colorado Blue Spruce -- 9' 5 @ 426.00 EA 2,130 Imperial Locust -- 4" cal. 17 @ 417.00 EA 7,089 Snowdrift Crab -- 2" B&B 17 @ 138.00 EA 2,346 Amur Maple -- 2" 17 @ 181.00 EA 1,267 Webber Juniper - 18" 50 @ 15.00 EA 750 Compact Pfitzer Juniper -- 18" 100 @ 20.00 EA 2,000 Emerald Mound Honeysuckle -- 2' 250 @ 20.00 EA 5,000 Spreading Cotoneaster -- 3" 170 @ 10.00 EA 1,700 Winged Euonymus -- 3' 125 @ 15.00 EA 1,875 Winterberry -- pot 24 @ 10.00 EA 240 Mulch 167 SY @ 1.50 SY 250 Fill for Planters 348 cu. yd. @ 8.00 cu. yd. 2,784 Sod 789 SY @ 2.00 SY 1,578 Page 2 FRIDLEY CITY CENTER Project No. 491.3 Item Quantity Unit Price Total Entry Pylon: 1 @ $ 2,500 Kiosks: 2 @ $4,500.00 EA 9,000 Trash Receptacles w/lighting: 7 @ 1,500.00 EA 10,000 Flagpoles: 2 @ 3,500.00 EA 7,000 Railings: 115 LF @ 50.00 LF 5,750 Fountain Elements: fountain w/12 voltage wiring 1 0 4,500 fountain 'sculpture' tubes 83 LF 0 20.00 LF 1 ,660 lighting -fit 5 @ 100 Ii EA 3,500 bubbler w/bell jet r. 65.00 E' •0 concrete base 1,044 SF @ 2.50 SF 2,610 5% Contingency: 14,000 Total - $294,371 ALTERNATES .(PLAZA) C2$bi �`'Z/ Irrigation: t7 A. lay pipe system 19,000 B. attach heads, controls, etc. 6,000 Crosswalk Pavers: Terra-Lok "Madrid" 1,320 SF @ 3.75 SF 4,950 Parking Lot Planting: Snowdrif crab trees, 3" cal . 13 @ 293.00 EA 3,874 TOTAL - ALTERNATES $ 33,824 GRAND TOTAL W/ALTERNATES $328,195 3cso c a$o1 3-71 ------ \----- FRIDLEY CITY CENTER Site Development (Office Building) * Item Quantity Unit Price Total Office Building Plant Materials: Austrian Pine--5' 5 @ $ 115.00 EA $ 575 Colorado Blue Spruce--5' 7 @ 149.00 EA 1 ,043 Colorado Blue Spruce--9' 2 @ 426.00 EA • 852 Imperial Locust--4' 6 @ 417.00 EA 2,502 Snowdrift Crab--2' 7 @ 138.00 EA 966 Amur Maple--2' 7 @ 181.00 EA 1 ,267 Compact Juniper--18' 20 @ 20.00 EA 400 Emerald Mound Honeysuckle 50 @ 20.00 EA 1 ,000 Winged Euonymus 40 @ 15.00 EA 600 Winterberry--pot 50 @ 10.00 EA 500 Mulch 50 SY @ 1.50 SY 75 Fill/Berm 200 CY @ 5.00 CY 1 ,000 Office Building Lighting: 6 @ 1,500.00 EA 9,000 Office Building Irrigation: 5,000 Broom-Finished Concrete: 1,337 SF @ 2.50 SF 3,343 Concrete Pavers: 135 SF @ 3.75 SF 506 Total $28,629 *Note: Total cost of the Office exterior development to be assessed to the office property