Resolution No. 2022-04 ST Rehab. Proj ST2022-01
Resolution No. 2022-04
Receiving Report and Calling for Public Hearing on Improvements for the 2022 Street
Rehabilitation Project No. ST2022-01
Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-84 approved by the Fridley City Council on September
27, 2021, a Feasibility Report has been prepared by the City of Fridley Public Works Department with
reference to the improvements listed in Exhibit A; and
Whereas, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-
effective, and feasible.
Now therefore, be it resolved that the Fridley City Council receives the Feasibility Report for the
2022 Street Rehabilitation Project No. ST2022-01.
Be it further resolved that the City Council will consider the improvement of such street in
accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the
cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $624,200.
Be it further resolved that a public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the
th
24 day of January 2022, in the Council Chambers of the Fridley City Hall at 7:00 p.m. and the City
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
rd
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 3 day of January, 2022.
_______________________________________
Scott J. Lund – Mayor
Attest:
Melisa Moore – City Clerk
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
2022 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
NO. ST2022-01
December2021
I hereby certify that this plan, specifications, or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer with the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
Ejhjubmmz!tjhofe!cz!
Kbnft!
Kbnft!Lptmvdibs!
Ebuf;!3132/23/34!
Lptmvdibs
26;49;14!.17(11(
________________________Date: December 23, 2021
James P. Kosluchar, P.E.
Registration No. 26460
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Description Page No.
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………. 3
STREET RESURFACING PLAN…………………………………………………………….. 4
BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 5
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................................... 5
Overview ............................................................................................................ 5
Pavement Resurfacing .................................................................................................. 6
Water Main Improvements ............................................................................................ 6
Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Repairs .................................................................. 7
ESTIMATED COSTS ...................................................................................................... 7
FUNDING SOURCES ..................................................................................................... 7
Street Rehabilitation Funding ...................................................................................... 7
Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Repairs .................................................................. 9
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 8
APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 9
FIGURE A PROJECT AREA MAP .................................................................. 120
FIGURE B OPINION OF PROBABLE COST................................................... 131
FIGURE C FUNDING SOURCES .................................................................... 142
FIGURE D PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................... 13
FIGURE E LIVING STREET WORKSHEET ..................................................... 14
2
INTRODUCTION
The City of Fridleyhas an ongoing obligation to maintain its streets in an efficient
manner, to provide a high level of service while maintaining a minimum budget. To
enable the City to identifyimprovementsthat will provide for an efficient level of service
and life-cyclecost, staff inspects and rates its pavements on a regular basis. The City
also has developed a pavement improvement plan based on resurfacing pavement and
base treatment with intermittent sealcoating. The goal is to provide maintenance
improvements at scheduled intervals. For example:
ActivitySchedule
Initial ConstructionYear 0
Sealcoating Year 8
Sealcoating Year 16
ResurfacingYear 24
Sealcoating Year 32
Sealcoating Year 40
ReconstructionYear 48
This is an ideal and aggressive sequence for street maintenance. Note that the final
reconstruction may be substituted with resurfacing activities if roadway base is in good
condition, with the intent to extend road life for an additional cycle of 24 years.
Due to the variability with budgets, road configurations, traffic patterns, condition of
utilities, source of funds, other projects, etc., the basic schedule above varies and
fluctuates for each roadway segment.
As part of identifying the best candidate for this year’s pavement resurfacing project,
City of Fridley Engineering Division staff works with Street Maintenance Division staff to
develop the list of candidate projects. The factors considered are physical
characteristics, budgetary factors, and other considerations are listedto assist in
selection of a best candidate.
The Engineering Division monitors existing pavements through semi-annual
inspections. From this inspection information, the Engineering Division prepares a
Street Resurfacing Plan consistent with the Street Capital Improvement Plan, which
designates candidate street segments for construction, reconstruction, and
rehabilitation. The City of Fridley also performs preventative surface maintenance (e.g.
sealcoating), routine crack sealing and pothole patching maintenance. The amount of
street maintenance on this segment is increasing annually due to the rapid deterioration
of the existing pavements.
The Engineering Division has prepared a Street Resurfacing Plan consistent with the
Long-Term Street Maintenance Program, which designates candidate street segments
for construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation. The Plan identifies the areas within
the city and the anticipated year for maintenance projects. Please refer to the following
mapsummarizing the Long-Term Street Maintenance Program.
3
STREET RESURFACINGPLAN
2022-01
PROJECT
4
BACKGROUND
This project includes three segments in the west portion of the City of Fridleyand two
segments in the southeast portion of the City of Fridley. The project includes street and
utility workforthe neighborhoodsof Black Forest, Hartman Circle, and Logan Park.
Staff originally proposed having the Marian Hills Neighborhood and the Georgetown
Apartments with the included streets of Cheri Lane, Fillmore Street and East River Road
West Service Drive as a part of this project, but due to available budget for 2022 in the
street and utility funds these streets were removed from the project.
See Figure A in the Appendix for a map of proposed street construction.
Black Forest Neighborhood
Street segments selected for rehabilitation include:
WEST BAVARIAN PASS from N INNSBRUCK DR to ARTHUR STREET
The street and underground utilities in the area were originally constructed in from early
to the mid-1970s. The street was last seal coated in 2012. Currently, the street provides
2-way traffic with no shoulder striping. The Annual Average Daily Traffic is estimated to
be 1,200 vehicles per day. The record pavement thickness ranges from 3.5” to 4.5”. The
underlying aggregate base thickness is approximately 6 inches of Class 5. The street
width is approximately 31 feet wide.
Hartman Circle Neighborhood
Street segments selected for rehabilitation include:
HARTMAN CIRCLE from EAST RIVER RD to HARTMAN CIRCLE E. LEG
The streets and underground utilities in the area were originally constructed in from late-
1950s through the early 1970s. A portion of the streetwas reconstructed in 2002 and
waslast seal coated in 2018. Currently, the street provides2-way traffic with no
shoulder striping. Theroad is alow volume local street,and the Annual Average Daily
Traffic is estimated to be less than 500 vehicles per day.The record pavement
thickness ranges from 1.5”to 4”. The underlying aggregate base thickness ranges from
4inches to 6inches of Class 5. The street widthis approximately 35 feet wide.
Logan Park Neighborhood
Street segments selected for rehabilitation include:
ST
71WAY from EAST RIVER ROAD to RIVERVIEW TERRACE
ST
RIVERVIEW TERRACE from 71WAYto 71 ½ WAY
The streets and underground utilities in the area were originally constructed in from mid-
1960s. These streets were last seal coated in 2018. Currently, the streets provide 2-way
traffic with no shoulder striping. The Annual Average Daily Traffic is estimated to be less
than 500 vehicles per day for Riverview Terrace and estimated to be around 800
5
st
vehicles per day for 71Way.The record pavement thickness for these streets is
approximately3”. The underlying aggregate base thickness is 4”of stabilizing base
oil/sand mix. The street widths range from 29feet on RiverviewTerraceto 35feet on
st
71Way.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Overview
Street rehabilitation is funded through atypical combination of funding sources,
including Minnesota State Aid System (MSAS) funding and special assessments.
Due to Covid-19 and social distancing concerns, staff did not host a traditional in-person
open house for the project. Instead, staff recorded a presentation highlighting project
overview, construction impacts, anticipated schedule, draft budget, and estimated
special assessments for proposed project. The presentation was uploaded to the project
website and notifications were mailed out to residents and property owners in the
project area to visit the project website, view the presentation, and contact staff with any
questions or concerns about the project that can be taken into consideration as the
project evolves to final design.
The length of all segments included in this residentialproject area is approximately 1.56
miles. The work will include pavement resurfacing, water main replacement, and storm
sewer improvements including spot curb repair.
In September2021, ResolutionNo. 2021-84was adopted by City Council to initiate the
2022Street Rehabilitation Project No. ST2022-01.
Pavement Resurfacing
Rehabilitation of the streets will include
asphalt reclaiming, asphalt paving, concrete
curb repairs, and miscellaneous utility
repairs. Damaged or settled concrete curbs
will be replaced. Staff has conducteda
Living Streets evaluation of the project area
and will address the findings as feasible in
the design of the project.The worksheet is
included as Figure E of the appendices.
Geotechnical soil exploration is being performed for all of the segments to verify existing
conditions and identify any soil correction needed.
Black Forest Neighborhood(West Bavarian Pass)
Construction records indicate that thisstreet has a pavement depth to be approximately.
3½“ to4 ½” thick with 6” of aggregate base under the pavement surface. Staff
considered a mill and overlay process but determined that the existing crackswill reflect
6
through a new asphalt pavement.The street isdetermined to haveinadequate street
structure and requiresbase rehabilitation. Staff has further determined that the base
can be strengthened by reclaiming the asphalt pavement into the base. Base
rehabilitation will include the mixing of pulverized asphalt surface into the underlying
soils to improve the structural strength. A stronger base will increase the pavement life.
Staff will also ensure that the crown on the roadway in constructed to City standards to
shed the water off the pavement surface faster to increase the pavement life.
Staff recommends standard local roadway pavement and base rehabilitation consisting
of full depth reclamation and topped with 3”-3.5” of asphalt pavement.
Hartman Circle Neighborhood (Hartman Circle)
Construction records indicate that this street has a pavement depth to be approximately.
1 ½“ to 4” thick with a range of 4” to 6” of aggregate base under the pavement surface.
Staff considered a mill and overlay process but determined that the shallow depth of
bituminous asphalt for most of the segment combined with the proposed utility work in
the area that the mill and overlay process wasn’t practicable. The street is determined to
have inadequate street structure and requires base rehabilitation. Staff has further
determined that the base can be strengthened by reclaiming the asphalt pavement into
the base. Base rehabilitation will include the mixing of pulverized asphalt surface into
the underlying soils to improve the structural strength. A stronger base will increase the
pavement life. Staff will also ensure that the crown on the roadway in constructed to City
standards to shed the water off the pavement surface faster to increase the pavement
life.
Staff recommends standard local roadway pavement and base rehabilitation consisting
of full depth reclamation and topped with 3”-3.5” of asphalt pavement.
st
Logan Park Neighborhood (71Way and Riverview Terrace)
Construction records indicate that this street has a pavement depth to be approximately.
3” thick with 4” of stabilizing base oil/sand mix. Staff considered a mill and overlay
process but determined that the existing depth of bituminous asphalt and the need for
st
concrete curb replacements and concrete valley gutter on 71Way the mill and overlay
process is not feasible.The street isdetermined to have inadequate street structure and
requires base rehabilitation. Staff has further determined that the base can be
strengthened by reclaiming the asphalt pavement into the base. Base rehabilitation will
include the mixing of pulverized asphalt surface into the underlying soils to improve the
structural strength. A stronger base will increase the pavement life. Staff will also
ensure that the crown on the roadway in constructed to City standards to shed the water
off the pavement surface faster to increase the pavement life.
Staff recommends standard local roadway pavement and base rehabilitation consisting
of full depth reclamation and topped with 3”-3.5” of asphalt pavement.
7
Water Main Improvements
Hartman Circle Neighborhood(Hartman Circle)
Water main work will include replacing approximately 600lineal feet (LF)of 6”
watermain. Staff has identified the portion of water main within the corridor of South
Hartman Circle and portions of East & West Hartman Circle to be replaced. One fire
hydrant will be replaced within this project.
This work will include replacement of the mainand services, including installation of a
newcurb stop on the short side. The long side services will be coupled to the existing
service at the junction of the new main. Water main break history is the determinant
factor that influences which segments of main are replaced, along with soil type,
presence of groundwater, and pipe material.
Sanitary Sewer Repairs
Sanitary sewer repairs will not be a part of the ST2022-01project. No severe defects
that required system reconstruction were identified with the sanitary sewer system in
this project area. Castings on the sanitary sewer manholes will be either replaced or
reset as a part of the paving.
Staff will provide inspection service on resident laterals to identify severe root intrusion
at the main connection. Property owners have been notified and may coordinate with
the Sewer Division to complete a video inspection of the service line. Excavations to
repair and clean service laterals with severe root intrusions are born by the property
owner, per City Code.
Storm Sewer Repairs
Storm sewer repairs will include curb replacement and manhole/inlet adjustments and
repairs. Catch basin and manhole structures are generally in good condition.
Private Utility Work
The project scope has been provided to private utilities to allow them to upgrade their
facilities during the project. At this time, none of the private utilities have not provided
information on their need to upgrade or repair their facilities.
ESTIMATED COSTS
The project cost is estimated to be $624,200. This estimate includes 5% contingency
and overhead costs relating to technical services, printing, publishing, permit fees, etc.
All costs are preliminary but are expected to stay within the budgeted amount.
Estimated costs of the project can be found on Figure Bof the Appendix.
FUNDING SOURCES
Costs for this project will be paid using Minnesota State Aid Systemfunding, utility
enterprise funds, and special assessments.The street rehabilitation work is subject to
8
special assessment; utility work is not proposed to be subject to special assessment. A
preliminary project budget can be found inFigureCof the Appendix.
Street RehabilitationFunding
The estimated cost of $340,000for the City’s pavement rehabilitation will be funded
using monies from special assessmentsand the City’s Minnesota State Aid System
account. The City will assess adjacent residential properties in accordance with its
major street maintenance policy for local streets. These assessments will provide
approximately $267,760 based on the full project scope and is currently only included
for the proposed rehabilitated street segments. The following assessments are based
on past history as applied by Council policiesfor Low Density Residential (single family,
duplex). Using these past methods of calculating assessments, and considering our
preliminary project budget, staff has estimated assessment of approximately $680per
unit for West Bavarian Pass, $3,100 per unit for Hartman Circle and $2,840 per unit for
st
71Way and Riverview Terrace units for the Low Density Residential properties.
The remaining balance of approximately $72,240for local street resurfacing will be
reimbursed from the City’s Minnesota State Aid System account.
Water Main Improvements
The estimated cost of $225,500 for upgrading the water main distribution system will be
funded using monies from the Water Utility Fund. In 2022, $600,000 in funding is
identified within the CIP as a capital expenditure.Note two other water main
thth
replacement projects associated with street projects (ST2021-01 and 7 Street/57
Avenue Trail Project) will share the2022water utility funding source.
Sanitary Sewer Repairs
The estimated cost of $10,900for maintaining the sanitary sewer collection system will
be funded using monies from the Sewer Fund. In 2022, $25,000 in funding is identified
with in the CIP as a capital expenditure.
Storm Sewer Repairs
The estimated cost of $47,800 for storm sewer improvements will be funded using
monies from the Storm Water Fund. In 2022, $65,000 in funding is identified with in the
CIP as a capital expenditure.
CONSTRUCTION
Construction sequencing will include consideration of access for all properties. A minor
exception will be immediately after asphalt has been constructed, which is most likely to
occur on weekday daytime hours. On residential street segments the project will be
phased so that access is preserved. Similarly, minor disruptions to utility services may
occur during the project but this will be limited to several hours at most.
In order to provide the best access and eliminate conflicts between contractors the
project is proposed to start in May and conclude by September.
9
SUMMARY
The work proposed for ST2022-01Street Rehabilitation project is consistent withthe
City of Fridley’s Long-Term Street Maintenance Program, 2022-2026Capital Investment
Program, and can be fully funded by its 2022 Budget. The project is cost effective,
necessary, and feasible from an engineering standpoint as described in this report. The
Engineering Department recommends that the City Council approve this project as
presented.
10
APPENDICES
11
FIGURE APROJECT AREA MAP
12
CITY OF FRIDLEY - 2022 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST: PROJECT NO. ST2022-01
DATE: 12/23/2021
ITEM NO.MnDOT NO.
DESCRIPTION UNIT EST. QTYUNIT COSTEXTENDED COST
SCHEDULE A - STREETS
12021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM0.50$ 60,000.00 $ 30,000.00
22104.503SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT300$ 3.75 $ 1,125.00
32105.507COMMON EXCAVATION (P) (EXCESS RECLAIM)CU YD1,591$ 8.00 $ 12,728.00
42112.519SUBGRADE PREPARATION (P)ROAD STA46.81$ 300.00 $ 14,043.00
52215.504FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (8")(P)SQ YD16,369$ 1.50 $ 24,553.50
62331.603BITUMINOUS JOINT SAW & SEALLIN FT4,100$ 2.50$ 10,250.00
72357.506BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGAL982$ 2.85$ 2,798.70
82360.509TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON1,351$ 70.00$ 94,570.00
92360.509TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON1,800$ 67.00 $ 120,600.00
102563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM0.60$ 10,000.00 $ 6,000.00
112565.602RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6' X 6'EACH2.00$ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00
122582.50124" STOP LINE WHITE: EPOXYLIN FT26.00$ 60.00 $ 1,560.00
132584.501PAVEMENT MESSAGE WHITE: EPOXYSQ FT42.00$ 25.00 $ 1,050.00
142582.5024" SOLID DOUBLE LINE YELLOW: EPOXYLIN FT175.00$ 3.50 $ 612.50
152583.5024" SOLID SINGLE LINE WHITE: EPOXYLIN FT55.00$ 2.00$ 110.00
162582.503CROSSWALK: EPOXYSQ FT240.00$ 3.50$ 840.00
SUBTOTAL:$ 323,840.70
5% ENG/ADMIN:$ 16,192.04
SCHEDULE A - STREETS TOTAL:$ 340,032.74
SCHEDULE B - SANITARY SEWER
12021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM0.02$ 60,000.00 $ 1,200.00
22506.502ADJUST EXISTING FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)EACH23$ 400.00 $ 9,200.00
SUBTOTAL:$ 10,400.00
5% ENG/ADMIN:$ 520.00
SCHEDULE B - SANITARY SEWER TOTAL:$ 10,920.00
SCHEDULE C - STORM SEWER
12021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM0.10$ 60,000.00 $ 6,000.00
22104.503REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERLIN FT935$ 5.00 $ 4,675.00
32104.501REMOVE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTERLIN FT40$ 8.00 $ 320.00
42123.61STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR25$ 150.00 $ 3,750.00
52506.502ADJUST EXISTING FRAME AND RING CASTING (STORM)EACH5$ 400.00 $ 2,000.00
62531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT935$ 20.00 $ 18,700.00
72531.603CONCRTE VALLEY GUTTER 36” WIDELIN FT115$ 60.00 $ 6,900.00
82573.502STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONEACH21$ 150.00 $ 3,150.00
SUBTOTAL:$ 45,495.00
5% ENG/ADMIN:$ 2,274.75
SCHEDULE C - STORM SEWER TOTAL:$ 47,769.75
CITY OF FRIDLEY - 2022 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST: PROJECT NO. ST2022-01
DATE: 12/23/2021
ITEM NO.MnDOT NO.
DESCRIPTION UNIT EST. QTYUNIT COSTEXTENDED COST
SCHEDULE D - WATER
12021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM0.38$ 60,000.00 $ 22,800.00
22104.502REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH2$ 425.00 $ 850.00
32104.502REMOVE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVEEACH1$ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
42104.502REMOVE CURB STOP & BOXEACH7$ 350.00 $ 2,450.00
52104.503REMOVE WATERMAINLIN FT600$ 5.00 $ 3,000.00
62104.503REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPELIN FT190$ 3.00$ 570.00
72104.503REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERLIN FT280$ 10.00$ 2,800.00
82104.504REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD18$ 8.00$ 144.00
92104.504REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD29$ 22.00 $ 638.00
102360.6043" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY W/6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESQ YD18$ 95.00 $ 1,710.00
11 2503.603REPAIR SEWER PIPE (SANITARY SEWER LATERAL)LIN FT70$ 65.00 $ 4,550.00
122504.601TEMPORARY WATER SERVICELUMP SUM1$ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00
132504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN (INCLUDES EXCAVATION PIT)EACH4$ 2,000.00 $ 8,000.00
142504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE (INCLUDES EXCAVATION PIT)EACH11$ 300.00 $ 3,300.00
152504.6021" CORPORATION STOPEACH11$ 1,000.00$ 11,000.00
162504.6021" CURB STOP & BOXEACH7$ 500.00$ 3,500.00
172504.6026" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH4$ 2,000.00 $ 8,000.00
182504.602ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX (WATER)EACH4$ 850.00 $ 3,400.00
192504.602HYDRANT WITH 6" GATE VALVE ASSEMBLYEACH1$ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00
202504.6036" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 (OPEN CUT INSTALLATION)LIN FT610$ 80.00 $ 48,800.00
212504.6031" WATER SERVICE (TYPE K COPPER)LIN FT190$ 65.00 $ 12,350.00
222504.608FITTINGSPOUND331$ 15.00 $ 4,965.00
232531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT280$ 25.00 $ 7,000.00
242531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD29$ 100.00 $ 2,900.00
252540.602REMOVAL, TEMPORARY INSTALLATION & REINSTALLATION OF MAILBOXESLUMP SUM1$ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
262563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM0.4$ 10,000.00 $ 4,000.00
272574.507COMMON TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD90$ 40.00 $ 3,600.00
282574.508FERTILIZER TYPE 3POUND17.00$ 1.00 $ 17.00
292575.505SEEDINGACRE0.06$ 2,000.00 $ 120.00
302575.508SEED MIXTURE 25-151POUND10$ 5.00 $ 50.00
312575.508EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CAT. 3NSQ YD275$ 2.50 $ 687.50
SUBTOTAL:$ 214,701.50
5% ENG/ADMIN:$ 10,735.08
SCHEDULE D - WATER TOTAL:$ 225,436.58
GRAND TOTAL (A+B+C+D):$ 624,159.06
Figure C - Funding Sources 12/23/2021
ST2021-01 Street Rehabilitation Project JPK / BJB / NRS
Estimated
Construction2022 Budgeted
No.DescriptionAmountAmount
1Special Assessments*$267,760.00$203,000.00
2Water Fund$225,500.00$250,000.00
3Sanitary Sewer Fund$10,900.00$25,000.00
4Storm Water Fund$47,800.00$65,000.00
5MSA Funding$72,240.00$126,000.00
Grand Total$624,200.00$669,000.00
Special Assessment Breakdown
Assessments (West Bavarian Pass)
LDR Single Family74x$ 680.00=$50,320.00
Non-LDR Commercial 0x$ 40.00=$0.00
West Bavarian Pass Total$50,320.00
Assessments (Hartman Circle)
LDR Single Family34x$ 3,100.00=$105,400.00
Non-LDR Commercial 320x$ 39.50=$12,640.00
Hartman Circle Total$118,040.00
Assessments (71st Way/Riverview Terrace)
LDR Single Family35x$ 2,840.00=$99,400.00
Non-LDR Commercial 0x$ 40.00=$0.00
71st Way/Riverview Terrace Total$99,400.00
Assessment Grand Total$267,760.00
*Note that Special Assessments amounts are a calculated need for Estimated Amount,
based on the project estimate, and the Budgeted Amount is calculated based on the project
scope and property information.
Figure D – Project Schedule
ST2022-01Street Rehabilitation Project
The tentativeschedule for this project is as follows:
PRELIMINARY ACTIVITIES
Virtual Project Presentation:Nov/Dec 2021
Preliminary Assessment Hearing: January24, 2021
DESIGN AND SUBMITTALS
Agency Submittals Complete: March2022
Design Completed:March2022
LETTING, AWARD, AND CONSTRUCTION
Resolution Advertising for Bids:March2022
First Advertisement for Bids: March2022
Bid Letting: March2022
Contract Award:April2022
Begin Construction (earliest):May2022
Complete Construction (deadline): September2022
FINAL ACTIVITIES
Final Assessment Hearing: October 2022
Certified Assessment Roll Complete:November 2022
Note: subsequent activities may be influenced by changes in schedule of previous activities.
15
FIGURE E - Living Streets Worksheet
Project Narrative
1) Project Information:
2022-01 Street Project: West Bavarian Pass NE, Hartman Circle, and Riverview Terrace
st
NE/71Way NE
2) Roadway Jurisdiction:
City of Fridley
3) Project Name:
20220-01
4) Project Start Point:
See attached map
5) Project End Point:
See attached map
6) Project Manager:
Brandon Brodhag
7) Is the project area, or streets it intersects, referenced in any of the following plans:
City’s Active Transportation Plan
Safe Routes to School Plan (Hayes, North Park, Stevenson, Fridley Middle)
Roadway Corridor Study (ex: East River Road corridor study, TH 47/65 corridor study)
Transit Overlay District
Fridley Parks Master Plan (under development)
Local Water Management Plan
Stormwater Retrofit Analysis
8) If so, how does the plan reference Living Street components within the project area or
streets it intersects?
East River Road Corridor Study:
No sight line improvements for the intersection of Hartman Circle at East River Rd
were recommended in the corridor study
16
Sidewalk was recommended onHartman Circle to Osborne Rd on East River Rd
Existing Conditions
9) Describe existing and projected modal volumes, if available:
Volumes ExistingProjected (Year)
Average Daily Traffic
Pedestrian Counts
Bicycle Counts
Truck Volumes
Transit Volumes
Speed Conditions
10) Detail crash data, if available, and known conflict locations:
a. Do crashes tend to be between certain modes?
No
b. Are there known conflict points between specific modes?
No
11) Who are the users of the project area and through what mode do they travel?
The primary users of the project area are residential. Users travel mainly by car as
well as some walking and biking
The MRT is located across East River Rd from the Hartman Circle/Riverview
Terrace NE section
Manomin Park users may be entering the southernmost segment on Hartman
Circle to access the parking lot
12) How does the existing area accommodate different modes travelling north-south and/or
east-west? Are additional routes needed?
All pedestrian and bicyclist traffic is on local roads
The MRT is located across East River Rd from the Hartman Circle/Riverview
Terrace NE section. Public comment during meetings about the L32 lift station
17
indicated interest in rerouting the MRT along Riverview Terrace and Hartman
Circle.
There is a trail entrance into Manomin Park from Hartman Circle that provides an
entrance to the MRT
13) Are there any problematic or dangerous pedestrian crossings in the area? How can those
crossings be addressed? If so, do they comply with the Local Road Research Board
Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crosswalk Reference Guide?
st
There is a stop light at 71and East River Rd that is not ADA accessible.
Crossings can be addressed with improved landing pads. The intersection is
striped with cross bars
st
Crossing East River Rd at 71Avenue occurs by entering Manomin Park and
using the pedestrian tunnel
14) Describe any public transit facilities along the project area:
Route 852 travels down East River Rd. There is no landing zone for Stop 12140 at
Hartman Circle and East River Rd, considerations should be given to improving the stop.
st
There is a sidewalk connecting Stop 12135 on East River Rd to 71Way.
15) Describe any significant destinations along the routes or for which the project area is a
connector (schools, parks, libraries, Civic Campus, commercial corridors):
Logan Park is located to the north of the Riverview Terrace section
The L32 Lift Station is between the Hartman Circle and Riverview Terrace project
segments and has the potential to be a park
Manomin Park is located to the south of the Hartman Circle segment and a
parking lot for the Park is located on the roadway. There is a fishing dock located
off the MRT on Locke Lake; this parking lot is the nearest spot to park for this
dock
Innsbruck Nature Center is located to the north and Farr lake Park is located to
the south of the West Bavarian Pass section
16) Are there areas of identified speeding or other dangerous driving? How can these areas
be addressed?
No
17) Describe any barriers to pedestrian/bicyclist movement in the project area. How can
these barriers be addressed?
Riverview Terrace and Hartman Circle are disconnected along East River Rd. This could
be addressed by a sidewalk along the western side of East River Rd.
18) Are there known water quality or quantity concern in the project area or downstream of
the project area?
18
Ponding occurs in front of a property on Hartman Circle
West Bavarian Pass drains to the Innsbruck Nature Center wetlands, which have
known sedimentation issues
The Hartman Circle section drains to Rice Creek downstream of Locke Lake
The Riverview Terrace section drains directly to the Mississippi River
19) How does the existing area manage stormwater? How can stormwater management be
improved?
There is no treatment in these areas except for the small rain garden. The inlet to the
small rain garden could potentially be improved or the rain garden expanded to receive
more water. Sumps could be installed to capture sediment.
20) Describe the existing landscaping. Any opportunities for enhanced vegetation or water
conservation?
This area has mainly residential landscaping. There are opportunities to promote Rice
Creek mini-grant program and shoreland stabilization program to homeowners on Rice
Creek. Revegetated lawns could include bee lawn seed mix.
21) Mark any Living Streets components exist in the project and on streets that it intersects?
__X__ Trails, sidewalks, and on-street, striped bike lanes
_____ Median islands
_____ Accessible pedestrian signals
_____ Curb extensions/bump outs
_____ Narrower travel lanes/road diets
__X__ Speed limits and other traffic calming improvements
__X__ Safe crossing facilities, including pavement markings
_____ Safe and effective lighting
__X__ Diverse tree plantings
__X__ Stormwater management
__X__ Pollinator-friendly/water efficient landscaping
_____ Bike racks
_____ Benches
_____ Water fountains
_____ Waste receptacles
_____ Public art
_____ Other components as determined based on latest and best “Living Streets”
standards
22) Are there any areas that are “under-lit”?
No
23) Describe any user needs/challenges along the project corridor that you have observed or
been informed of:
19
None
Proposed Conditions:
1) What public engagement has been done or is planned related to Living Streets
components?
Project outreach performed through project webpage.
2) What modes does the proposed facility accommodate?
No additional modes
3) How does the proposed facility accommodate different modes north-south and/or east-
west?
No additional modes
4) How does the proposed facility assist different modes in reaching significant
destinations?
No additional modes
5) Does the proposed landscaping enhance the urban forest or promote pollinator
habitat/water-efficient landscaping?
No
6) Does the proposed project improve any identified water quality or quantity concerns
within or downstream of the project area?
Staff is investigating the feasibility of installing a sump at Riverview Terrace and 71 ½
Way using a CCWD cost share grant to reduce sedimentation to the Mississippi River.
7) Does the proposed project remediate any design challenges that prevent
pedestrian/bicyclist movement?
No
8) Provide an alternative cross section that was considered, list trade-offs associated with
alternative cross-section:
9) If Living Streets components are not included, mark and explain which exception under
the Living Streets policy is the motivation to not include the components:
_____ The project involves a transportation system on which certain modes and users are
prohibited either by law or significant safety reasons.
20
_____ The street jurisdiction (Anoka County of the State of Minnesota for non-city streets)
refuses suggested plans.
_____ The cost of accommodation is excessively disproportionate to the need or probable
use.
_____ The corridor has severe topographic, environmental, historic or natural resource
constraints.
_____ There is a well-documented absence of current and future need.
_____ Other exceptions are allowed when recommended by the Public Works, Building &
Community Standards, Parks and Recreation, and Police and Fire departments, and
approved by the City Council.
21