The URL can be used to link to this page

09-26-2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 26, 2022 7:00 PM Fridley Civic Center - 7071 University Avenue N.E. The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, program, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley’s services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need any interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at (763) 572-3500. (TTD/763-572-3534). AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of the Federal Facility Excellence in Site Reuse Award 2022 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. Approve the Minutes from the City Council Meeting of September 12, 2022 3. Receive the Minutes from the City Council Conference Meeting of September 12, 2022 4. Receive the Minutes from the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of August 1, 2022 NEW BUSINESS 5. Resolution No. 2022-102, Awarding 7th Street and 57th Avenue Trail Project 6. Resolution No. 2022-103, Directing Public Safety Department to Enter Into Agreement and Authorizing Execution of Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety, Federal Grant Program Agreement for DWI Officer 7. Resolution No. 2022-107, Designating Time and Number of City Council Meetings for 2023 8. Resolution No. 2022-108, Approving Agreement for Construction Management Services for Moore Lake Park Building CLAIMS 1 City Council Meeting 9/26/2022 Agenda Page 2 9. Resolution No. 2022-109 Approving Claims for the Period Ending September 21, 2022 ADOPTION OF REGULAR AGENDA OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of Items not on Agenda – 15 minutes. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS NEW BUSINESS 10. Resolution No. 2022-104, Consenting to the Property Tax Levy for 2022, Collectible in 2023, for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley 11. Resolution No. 2022-105, Approving the Proposed Property Tax Levy for 2022, Collectible in 2023, for the City of Fridley 12. Resolution No. 2022-106, Approving the Proposed 2023 General Fund Budget for the City of Fridley INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS ADJOURN 2 Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Paul Bolin, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Assistant Executive Director Title Presentation of the Federal Facility Excellence in Site Reuse Award 2022 Background The US Environmental Protection Agency presented Hyde Development, Mortenson Construction, and the City of Fridley with the Federal Facility Excellence in Site Reuse Award 2022 for the Northern Stacks project. The former Superfund site was previously used as a Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, will present the Award. Financial Impact None. Attachments and Other Resources 3 Item 1. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Roberta S. Collins, Assistant to the City Manager Title Approve the Minutes from the City Council Meeting of September 12, 2022 Background Attached are the minutes from the City Council meeting of September 12, 2022. Financial Impact None. Recommendation Approve the minutes from the City Council meeting of September 12, 2022. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship X Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Minutes from the City Council Meeting of September 12, 2022 4 Item 2. CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 12, 2022 7:00 PM Fridley Civic Campus, 7071 University Avenue N.E. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Lund called the City Council Meeting of September 12, 2022, to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Mayor Scott Lund Councilmember Dave Ostwald Councilmember Tom Tillberry Councilmember Stephen Eggert Councilmember Ann Bolkcom Walter Wysopal, City Manager Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Amanda Faulk, Community Engagement Coordinator, Alexandra House Dave Unmacht, Executive Director of the League of Minnesota Cities Gary Carlson, Intergovernmental Relations Director of the League of Minnesota Cities PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation: Domestic Violence Awareness Month – October 2022 Mayor Lund presented the proclamation designating October as Domestic Violence Awareness month. Amanda Fulk, Community Engagement Coordinator at Alexandra House, stated that proclaiming October as domestic violence awareness month shows support for the organization and those it serves. She stated that this action ensures that victims feel heard and supported and thanked the City for its support. 2. Presentation of League of Minnesota Cities’ 2022 James F. Miller Leadership Award to City Manager Wally Wysopal Dave Unmacht, Executive Director of the LMC, recognized City Manager Wally Wysopal and presented him with the 2022 James F. Miller Leadership Award. He also played a short video recognizing Mr. Wysopal. Mr. Wysopal commented that he loves being a City Manager and loves working for the City of Fridley and with the other members of City staff. 5 Item 2. City Council Meeting 9/12/2022 Minutes Page 2 Gary Carlson, Intergovernmental Relations Director for the LMC, commented that he has known Mr. Wysopal for years and he has contributed many greats thoughts and ideas. He also recognized Mr. Wysopal for the mentorship he has provided to others. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA Motion made by Councilmember Tillberry to adopt the proposed Consent Agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. Approve the Minutes from the City Council Meeting of August 22, 2022. 4. Receive the Minutes from the City Council Conference Meeting of August 22, 2022. 5. Receive the Minutes from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of July 7, 2022. NEW BUSINESS 6. Resolution No. 2022-99, Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of the Proposed Assessment Roll and Directing Publication of the Public Hearing Notice for the Street Rehabilitation Project No. ST-2021-01. 7. Resolution No 2022-100, Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of the Proposed Assessment Roll and Directing Publication of the Public Hearing Notice for the Street Rehabilitation Project No. ST-2022-01. 8. Resolution No. 2022-101, Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of the Proposed Assessment Roll, and Directing Publication of the Public Hearing Notice for the 2022 Nuisance Abatements and 2022 Rental Reinspection Fees. LICENSES 9. Resolution No. 2022-98, Approving City Permits. CLAIMS 10. Resolution No. 2022-97, Approving Claims for the Period Ending September 8, 2022. 6 Item 2. City Council Meeting 9/12/2022 Minutes Page 3 ADOPTION OF REGULAR AGENDA Motion made by Councilmember Ostwald to adopt the regular agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Eggert. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of Items not on Agenda – 15 minutes. No one from the audience spoke. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS NEW BUSINESS INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS The Council advised of the upcoming Autumn Sampler occurring at Springbrook Nature Center this Saturday, September 17. Council thanked those who participated and provided input in the park concepts plan for Moore Lake and noted that comments can still be provided online. ADJOURN Motion made by Councilmember Ostwald to adjourn. Seconded by Councilmember Eggert. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:29 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, Melissa Moore Scott J. Lund City Clerk Mayor 7 Item 2. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Roberta S. Collins, Assistant to the City Manager Title Receive the Minutes from the City Council Conference Meeting of September 12, 2022 Background Attached are the minutes from the City Council Conference Meeting of September 12, 2022. Financial Impact None. Recommendation Receive the minutes from the City Council Conference Meeting of September 12, 2022. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship X Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Minutes from the City Council Conference Meeting of September 12, 2022 8 Item 3. COUNCIL CONFERENCE MEETING September 12, 2022 5:30 PM Fridley Civic Campus, 7071 University Avenue N.E. MINUTES PRESENT Mayor Scott Lund Councilmember Dave Ostwald Councilmember Tom Tillberry Councilmember Stephen Eggert Councilmember Ann Bolkcom Walter Wysopal, City Manager Joe Starks, Finance Director Mike Maher, Parks & Recreation Director Ryan George, Deputy Director Melissa Moore, City Clerk Carol R. M. Moss, Attorney at Law ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 1. 2023 Proposed Budget Discussion. Joe Starks, Finance Director, provided an update on the 2023 proposed budget. 2. Moore Lake Park Update. Mike Maher, Parks & Recreation Director, provided an update on the Moore Lake Park improvement plan and the results of the open house on the plan held Saturday, September 10, 2022. 3. CBD and THC Sales in the City of Fridley. Ryan George, Deputy Director – Police, discussed CBD and THC sales in Fridley, and recent changes in the laws the City may need to consider. 9 Item 3. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Mike Maher, Director of Parks and Recreation Title Receive the Minutes from the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of August 1, 2022 Background Attached are the minutes from the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of August 1, 2022. Financial Impact None. Recommendation Receive the minutes from the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of August 1, 2022. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship X Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Minutes from the Parks and Recreation Commission of August 1, 2022 10 Item 4. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING August 1, 2022 7:00 PM Fridley Civic Campus, 7071 University Avenue N.E. MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Borman called the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT EB Graham Peter Borman Suad Maow Ken Schultz Mike Maher, Community Services Director Commissioner Maow introduced herself. APPROVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA FOR AUGUST 1, 2022 MOTION by Commissioner Graham to APPROVE the August 1, 2022 meeting agenda. SECONDED by Commissioner Schultz. The MOTION PASSED unanimously. APPROVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES 1. Approve Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of June 6, 2022 MOTION by Commissioner Schultz to APPROVE the June 6, 2022 meeting minutes. SECONDED by Commissioner Graham. The MOTION PASSED unanimously. NEW BUSINESS/ACTION ITEMS 2. Park Plan Communications and Engagement Plan Mike Maher, Community Services Director, presented the communications and engagement plan developed for the Park System Improvement Plan. He confirmed that mailers would be sent city- wide for larger community parks and more targeted mailings for neighborhood parks. The Commission asked for details on the scale of playground replacement, what would be done with the existing equipment, and the timeline for the projects. Mr. Maher recognized the ambitious 11 Item 4. Parks and Recreation Commission 8/01/2022 Minutes Page 2 schedule to fully replace four playgrounds in 2023 during the spring/summer. He stated that the existing playground equipment would be recycled or refurbished by another organization. 3. Moore Lake Park Community Building Update Mr. Maher provided a presentation on the proposed Moore Lake community building and relayed the preferences on design provided by the City Council. He provided clarity on the portion of the building that would be available for rental and the portion of the building that would be open to the general public at all times. The Commission asked if snow and water runoff has been considered in the design of the roof and asked for clarity on the locations of the public bathrooms. 4. Park Entrance Sign Recommendation Mr. Maher provided a presentation on potential park entrance signs and different design options. He asked for input from the Commission on their preferred design and color scheme. The Commission provided input on their design preferences and Mr. Maher noted that he will bring back refined options at the next meeting. OLD BUSINESS STAFF REPORTS 5. Springbrook Nature Center Report Mr. Maher reviewed the report highlighting summer programming and recreation opportunities. He also provided an update on a grant received through Xcel Energy. 6. Fridley Parks and Recreation Division Report Mr. Maher reviewed the report and provided details on park programming, ‘49er Days, as well as upcoming community events. 7. Park Maintenance and Construction Report Mr. Maher reviewed the written report. ADJOURNMENT 12 Item 4. Commissioner Graham made the MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:54 p.m., SECONDED by Commissioner Schultz. The MOTION PASSED unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Amanda Staple Recording Secretary 13 Item 4. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: James Kosluchar, Public Works Director Brandon Brodhag, Assistant City Engineer Title Resolution No. 2022-102, Awarding 7th Street and 57th Avenue Trail Project Background On Tuesday, August 30 at 9:00 a.m., bids were publicly opened online via the virtual platform available on QuestCDN and Microsoft Teams for the 7th Street and 57th Avenue Trail Project. Seven responsive bids were received. This project provides an off-street shared use trail on 7th Street from 53rd Avenue to 61st Avenue and on 57th Avenue from 7th Street to Highway 47. The project provides the off-road trail segment by narrowing 7th Street from 53rd Avenue to 61st Avenue with bumping out the eastern curb line and 57th Avenue from 7th Street to Highway 47 with bumping out the northern curb line. On 7th Street the parking lane on the east side of street will be eliminated and the northern parking lane on 57th Avenue will be eliminated to allow for room for the 10-foot shared use trail. This project was awarded funding through a competitive solicitation through the Met Council in 2018 and received $516,120 in federal funding administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). As noted, seven bids were received. The low bid was received from Thomas and Sons Construction of Rogers, Minnesota in the amount of $1,018,791.22, which is 29.1% above the final engineer’s estimate of $789,268.72 per the attached bid abstract (Exhibit A). The two lowest bids were very competitive and within $34,680.08 of one another and the four lowest bids were within $67,496.64. Of the seven bids, the high bid received was $1,371,716.17. Prior to the bid opening on August 30, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) reached out to staff to inform the City that they recognized rising construction costs this year, and that there was a potential for extra federal funds that they could apply to projects that were currently at the bidding/award stages to help fill the gap in the event bids were higher than estimated. After the bid opening and cost tabulation, staff advised MnDOT of the higher bids. MnDOT was able to obtain an extra $212,608 for a total of $728,728 in federal funding for the project. The extra funding is a match of the 80% of eligible federal participation for the project. The City’s 20% eligible federal participation match for the project will be lowered from the original amount of $200,000 to $182,182. The remaining portion of the project includes water utility work and will be funded by utility funds. Due to the supplemental funding through MnDOT, the project remains under budget despite the increased cost of construction. 14 Item 5. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. While the City of Fridley has not worked with Thomas and Sons Construction in the past, this contractor has performed work similar to this project, and has met all City, MnDOT, and FHWA requirements necessary to be considered for award of the project. Staff believes they are a knowledgeable and reputable contractor and will deliver the project within the requisite quality specified in the bid documents. The contractor can begin the project this fall if they so choose and have time in the 2023 construction season to complete the remaining or entire project should they prefer. Property owners will receive notification of project advancement this October presuming the City Council awards the project at this meeting. A project information sheet will provide a tentative work schedule, work description, and contact information. During the project, staff will distribute weekly project updates via email and the project-specific page on the City’s website to minimize disruption to the residents. We expect the work to begin in October with substantial completion in July of next year. Financial Impact Funding for this project is derived from several sources including FHWA Regional Solicitation grant funding, Municipal State Aid street funding, Street Reserve funds, and Water Utility funds. The construction budget breakdown is below. Since staff completed a large portion of the design/planning for the project in-house, there are savings of $60,000 for the budget. Funding Source Preliminary Budget Post-Bid Budget Federal Aid Participating $516,120 $728,728 State Aid – On-system $200,000 $182,182 Street Fund Reserves $155,000 - Water Utility Fund $57, 829 $107,881 Construction Total $928,949 $1,018,791 Planning/Design $100,000 $40,000 Project Total $1,028,949 $1,058,791 Recommendation Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 2022-102. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment x Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship Organizational Excellence 15 Item 5. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-102  Exhibit A: Bid Abstract 16 Item 5. Resolution No. 2022-102 Award of 7th Street and 57th Avenue Trail Project Whereas, the 7th Street and 57th Avenue Trail Project (Project) has been incorporated into the City of Fridley’s Capital Investment Program; and Whereas, the City of Fridley (City) has developed an Active Transportation Plan that identifies improvements to promote multi-modal travel along 7th Street from 53rd Avenue to 61st Avenue and 57th Avenue from 7th Street to Trunk Highway 47; and Whereas, outreach to the adjacent neighborhood by City staff to receive feedback included a hosted onsite event in June 2017 and a hosted open house in October 2019; and Whereas, the City has successfully obtained federal funding to improve 7th Street from 53rd Avenue to 61st Avenue and 57th Avenue from 7th Street to Trunk Highway 47; and Whereas, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Active Transportation Plan has identified these segments of 7th Street & 57th Avenue to be in need of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Now, therefore be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves received bids per the attached bid tabulation and award the 7th Street and 57th Avenue Trail Project to the lowest responsive bidder, Thomas and Sons Construction of Rogers, MN in the amount of $1,018,791.22. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day of September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor Attest: Melissa Moore – City Clerk 17 Item 5. S.P. 127-312-002, S.P. 127-301-006 Minn. Proj. No. TA 0222 (026) Line Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension 1 Mobilization LS 1 60,000.00$ 60,000.00$ $91,500.00 $91,500.00 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $54,000.00 $54,000.00 $58,193.00 $58,193.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.00 2 Clearing TREE 1 300.00$ 300.00$ $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,021.26 $1,021.26 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $900.00 $900.00 $1,530.00 $1,530.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3 Grubbing TREE 1 200.00$ 200.00$ $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,021.26 $1,021.26 $350.00 $350.00 $900.00 $900.00 $153.00 $153.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 4 Pavement Marking Removal LF 5653 0.85$ 4,805.05$ $1.10 $6,218.30 $0.61 $3,448.33 $0.50 $2,826.50 $0.80 $4,522.40 $0.90 $5,087.70 $0.80 $4,522.40 $1.00 $5,653.00 5 Pavement Marking Removal SF 278.14 3.00$ 834.42$ $4.40 $1,223.82 $4.28 $1,190.44 $5.00 $1,390.70 $4.00 $1,112.56 $2.50 $695.35 $4.00 $1,112.56 $3.00 $834.42 6 Remove Drainage Structure EA 11 600.00$ 6,600.00$ $700.00 $7,700.00 $516.67 $5,683.37 $750.00 $8,250.00 $1,000.00 $11,000.00 $507.00 $5,577.00 $960.00 $10,560.00 $660.00 $7,260.00 7 Remove Casting EA 3 100.00$ 300.00$ $150.00 $450.00 $380.25 $1,140.75 $250.00 $750.00 $200.00 $600.00 $140.00 $420.00 $197.00 $591.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 8 Remove Curb Stop & Box EA 5 200.00$ 1,000.00$ $500.00 $2,500.00 $172.22 $861.10 $250.00 $1,250.00 $300.00 $1,500.00 $98.00 $490.00 $623.00 $3,115.00 $800.00 $4,000.00 9 Remove Watermain LF 394 3.00$ 1,182.00$ $20.00 $7,880.00 $11.48 $4,523.12 $20.00 $7,880.00 $15.00 $5,910.00 $28.00 $11,032.00 $23.00 $9,062.00 $25.00 $9,850.00 10 Remove Water Service Pipe LF 68 4.00$ 272.00$ $20.00 $1,360.00 $9.19 $624.92 $20.00 $1,360.00 $10.00 $680.00 $15.00 $1,020.00 $11.00 $748.00 $25.00 $1,700.00 11 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 5123 5.00$ 25,615.00$ $5.00 $25,615.00 $6.33 $32,428.59 $5.00 $25,615.00 $4.00 $20,492.00 $3.80 $19,467.40 $8.00 $40,984.00 $12.00 $61,476.00 12 Remove Concrete Valley Gutter LF 43 8.00$ 344.00$ $15.00 $645.00 $13.04 $560.72 $15.00 $645.00 $6.00 $258.00 $6.20 $266.60 $31.00 $1,333.00 $12.00 $516.00 13 Remove Pipe Sewers (Storm) LF 239 15.00$ 3,585.00$ $24.00 $5,736.00 $11.48 $2,743.72 $20.00 $4,780.00 $16.00 $3,824.00 $52.00 $12,428.00 $19.00 $4,541.00 $45.00 $10,755.00 14 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF 548 3.00$ 1,644.00$ $6.00 $3,288.00 $3.10 $1,698.80 $4.00 $2,192.00 $3.00 $1,644.00 $2.90 $1,589.20 $3.00 $1,644.00 $10.00 $5,480.00 15 Remove Bituminous Driveway Pavement SY 217 5.00$ 1,085.00$ $10.00 $2,170.00 $11.26 $2,443.42 $6.75 $1,464.75 $8.00 $1,736.00 $6.00 $1,302.00 $20.00 $4,340.00 $20.00 $4,340.00 16 Remove Concrete Walk SY 697 12.00$ 8,364.00$ $12.00 $8,364.00 $8.48 $5,910.56 $13.50 $9,409.50 $7.00 $4,879.00 $3.40 $2,369.80 $17.00 $11,849.00 $20.00 $13,940.00 17 Remove Concrete Driveway Pavement SY 369 15.00$ 5,535.00$ $12.00 $4,428.00 $12.92 $4,767.48 $18.00 $6,642.00 $7.00 $2,583.00 $9.50 $3,505.50 $29.00 $10,701.00 $20.00 $7,380.00 18 Remove Bituminous Pavement SF 79 10.00$ 790.00$ $3.00 $237.00 $3.26 $257.54 $13.50 $1,066.50 $3.00 $237.00 $4.70 $371.30 $5.00 $395.00 $10.00 $790.00 19 Select Granular Embankment (CV) CY 66 20.00$ 1,320.00$ $45.00 $2,970.00 $54.32 $3,585.12 $75.00 $4,950.00 $45.00 $2,970.00 $25.50 $1,683.00 $45.00 $2,970.00 $100.00 $6,600.00 20 Common Excavation (P) CY 1344 17.00$ 22,848.00$ $20.00 $26,880.00 $50.52 $67,898.88 $22.00 $29,568.00 $43.00 $57,792.00 $32.30 $43,411.20 $33.00 $44,352.00 $35.00 $47,040.00 21 Subgrade Excavation CY 66 25.00$ 1,650.00$ $40.00 $2,640.00 $81.48 $5,377.68 $30.00 $1,980.00 $45.00 $2,970.00 $38.00 $2,508.00 $26.00 $1,716.00 $100.00 $6,600.00 22 Street Sweeper (With Pickup Broom) HOUR 33 150.00$ 4,950.00$ $210.00 $6,930.00 $179.26 $5,915.58 $1.00 $33.00 $175.00 $5,775.00 $187.00 $6,171.00 $150.00 $4,950.00 $165.00 $5,445.00 23 Aggregate Base (CV)(P) Class 5 CY 1077 30.00$ 32,310.00$ $30.00 $32,310.00 $76.98 $82,907.46 $55.00 $59,235.00 $60.00 $64,620.00 $40.00 $43,080.00 $49.00 $52,773.00 $50.00 $53,850.00 24 Full Depth Reclamation (P) SY 8167 1.50$ 12,250.50$ $4.00 $32,668.00 $1.73 $14,128.91 $2.00 $16,334.00 $3.50 $28,584.50 $2.00 $16,334.00 $3.00 $24,501.00 $9.00 $73,503.00 25 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GALLONS 196 3.00$ 588.00$ $4.50 $882.00 $4.18 $819.28 $5.00 $980.00 $5.00 $980.00 $3.80 $744.80 $5.00 $980.00 $5.00 $980.00 26 Type SP 9.5 Wearing Course Mix (3,B) - Trail TON 1011 85.00$ 85,935.00$ $118.00 $119,298.00 $106.96 $108,136.56 $123.00 $124,353.00 $107.00 $108,177.00 $120.00 $121,320.00 $120.00 $121,320.00 $140.00 $141,540.00 27 Type SP 9.5 Wearing Course Mix (3,C) TON 420 85.00$ 35,700.00$ $155.00 $65,100.00 $139.68 $58,665.60 $160.00 $67,200.00 $140.00 $58,800.00 $220.00 $92,400.00 $145.00 $60,900.00 $175.00 $73,500.00 28 3" Type SP 9.5 Wearing Course Mix (3,C) - Bituminous Driveway w/6" Cl. 5 Aggregate SY 281 40.00$ 11,240.00$ $55.00 $15,455.00 $47.93 $13,468.33 $74.00 $20,794.00 $65.00 $18,265.00 $69.00 $19,389.00 $35.00 $9,835.00 $73.00 $20,513.00 29 12" RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 LF 62 60.00$ 3,720.00$ $115.00 $7,130.00 $63.15 $3,915.30 $84.00 $5,208.00 $95.00 $5,890.00 $107.00 $6,634.00 $121.00 $7,502.00 $90.00 $5,580.00 30 15" RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 LF 30 70.00$ 2,100.00$ $125.00 $3,750.00 $74.63 $2,238.90 $94.00 $2,820.00 $105.00 $3,150.00 $120.00 $3,600.00 $132.00 $3,960.00 $100.00 $3,000.00 31 Connect into Existing Storm Sewer EA 5 1,000.00$ 5,000.00$ $1,250.00 $6,250.00 $1,377.78 $6,888.90 $875.00 $4,375.00 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,400.00 $12,000.00 $1,320.00 $6,600.00 $3,000.00 $15,000.00 32 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer EA 12 800.00$ 9,600.00$ $1,250.00 $15,000.00 $975.93 $11,711.16 $875.00 $10,500.00 $850.00 $10,200.00 $2,400.00 $28,800.00 $1,160.00 $13,920.00 $3,000.00 $36,000.00 33 Temporary Water Service LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $11,481.52 $11,481.52 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $10,780.00 $10,780.00 $34,950.00 $34,950.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 34 Connect to Existing Water Service EA 5 200.00$ 1,000.00$ $500.00 $2,500.00 $1,722.23 $8,611.15 $900.00 $4,500.00 $650.00 $3,250.00 $1,680.00 $8,400.00 $480.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 35 1" Curb Stop & Box EA 5 425.00$ 2,125.00$ $1,500.00 $7,500.00 $975.93 $4,879.65 $575.00 $2,875.00 $750.00 $3,750.00 $845.00 $4,225.00 $1,080.00 $5,400.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 36 1" Corporation Stop EA 5 500.00$ 2,500.00$ $1,250.00 $6,250.00 $516.67 $2,583.35 $575.00 $2,875.00 $600.00 $3,000.00 $843.00 $4,215.00 $1,610.00 $8,050.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 37 Adjust Gate Valve & Box EA 2 600.00$ 1,200.00$ $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $434.58 $869.16 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $400.00 $800.00 $552.00 $1,104.00 $473.00 $946.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 38 6" Gate Valve & Box EA 2 1,700.00$ 3,400.00$ $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $4,362.97 $8,725.94 $3,650.00 $7,300.00 $3,300.00 $6,600.00 $2,680.00 $5,360.00 $4,790.00 $9,580.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 39 Connect to Existing Watermain (Includes Pit Excavation) EA 2 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ $2,200.00 $4,400.00 $2,870.38 $5,740.76 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,050.00 $6,100.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $4,400.00 $8,800.00 40 1" Water Service (Type K Copper) LF 100 60.00$ 6,000.00$ $65.00 $6,500.00 $48.22 $4,822.00 $55.00 $5,500.00 $53.00 $5,300.00 $65.00 $6,500.00 $65.00 $6,500.00 $75.00 $7,500.00 41 6" Watermain Ductile Iron CL 52 (Open Cut Installation) LF 411 50.00$ 20,550.00$ $91.00 $37,401.00 $86.11 $35,391.21 $70.00 $28,770.00 $88.00 $36,168.00 $74.00 $30,414.00 $120.00 $49,320.00 $110.00 $45,210.00 42 Fittings LB 230 10.00$ 2,300.00$ $18.00 $4,140.00 $11.48 $2,640.40 $14.00 $3,220.00 $15.00 $3,450.00 $33.00 $7,590.00 $22.00 $5,060.00 $35.00 $8,050.00 43 Casting Assembly EA 3 1,000.00$ 3,000.00$ $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $923.47 $2,770.41 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,800.00 $5,400.00 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 44 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting (Sewer) EA 8 700.00$ 5,600.00$ $900.00 $7,200.00 $597.54 $4,780.32 $1,000.00 $8,000.00 $675.00 $5,400.00 $670.00 $5,360.00 $650.00 $5,200.00 $1,300.00 $10,400.00 45 Construct Drainage Structure Design G LF 6.2 500.00$ 3,100.00$ $750.00 $4,650.00 $574.08 $3,559.30 $900.00 $5,580.00 $900.00 $5,580.00 $775.00 $4,805.00 $1,550.00 $9,610.00 $1,100.00 $6,820.00 46 Construct Drainage Structure Design H LF 14.03 500.00$ 7,015.00$ $750.00 $10,522.50 $516.67 $7,248.88 $1,150.00 $16,134.50 $1,000.00 $14,030.00 $970.00 $13,609.10 $1,510.00 $21,185.30 $1,200.00 $16,836.00 47 Construct Drainage Structure Design N LF 17.36 500.00$ 8,680.00$ $750.00 $13,020.00 $516.67 $8,969.39 $1,000.00 $17,360.00 $900.00 $15,624.00 $843.00 $14,634.48 $1,760.00 $30,553.60 $1,200.00 $20,832.00 48 Construct Drainage Structure Design 48-4020 LF 28.28 1,000.00$ 28,280.00$ $875.00 $24,745.00 $631.48 $17,858.25 $1,100.00 $31,108.00 $1,100.00 $31,108.00 $943.00 $26,668.04 $1,810.00 $51,186.80 $1,200.00 $33,936.00 49 Concrete Slope Paving (4") SY 21 100.00$ 2,100.00$ $200.00 $4,200.00 $88.10 $1,850.10 $90.00 $1,890.00 $98.00 $2,058.00 $148.00 $3,108.00 $91.00 $1,911.00 $125.00 $2,625.00 50 6" Concrete Walk SF 5465 13.00$ 71,045.00$ $12.75 $69,678.75 $24.56 $134,220.40 $25.00 $136,625.00 $27.00 $147,555.00 $18.70 $102,195.50 $25.00 $136,625.00 $16.00 $87,440.00 51 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 LF 4853 21.00$ 101,913.00$ $24.00 $116,472.00 $26.38 $128,022.14 $26.00 $126,178.00 $24.00 $116,472.00 $21.00 $101,913.00 $26.00 $126,178.00 $28.00 $135,884.00 52 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B624 LF 438 36.00$ 15,768.00$ $36.00 $15,768.00 $36.81 $16,122.78 $37.00 $16,206.00 $34.00 $14,892.00 $39.00 $17,082.00 $37.00 $16,206.00 $45.00 $19,710.00 53 Concrete Curb Design V6 LF 14 35.00$ 490.00$ $90.00 $1,260.00 $35.90 $502.60 $36.00 $504.00 $33.00 $462.00 $63.00 $882.00 $37.00 $518.00 $77.00 $1,078.00 54 6" Concrete Driveway Pavement SY 309 100.00$ 30,900.00$ $91.00 $28,119.00 $85.82 $26,518.38 $87.00 $26,883.00 $98.00 $30,282.00 $85.00 $26,265.00 $89.00 $27,501.00 $90.00 $27,810.00 55 6" Concrete Valley Gutter SY 176 100.00$ 17,600.00$ $5.00 $880.00 $119.87 $21,097.12 $122.00 $21,472.00 $111.00 $19,536.00 $170.00 $29,920.00 $124.00 $21,824.00 $105.00 $18,480.00 56 Truncated Domes SF 793.3 60.00$ 47,598.00$ $60.00 $47,598.00 $48.89 $38,784.44 $50.00 $39,665.00 $48.00 $38,078.40 $61.00 $48,391.30 $51.00 $40,458.30 $70.00 $55,531.00 57 Repair/Replace Pet Fence & Irrigation System LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ $100.00 $100.00 $10,864.39 $10,864.39 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,200.00 $10,200.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 58 Traffic Control LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $19,012.67 $19,012.67 $19,500.00 $19,500.00 $26,000.00 $26,000.00 $90,600.00 $90,600.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 59 Sign Panels Type C SF 32.5 50.00$ 1,625.00$ $275.00 $8,937.50 $119.51 $3,884.08 $120.00 $3,900.00 $110.00 $3,575.00 $118.00 $3,835.00 $121.00 $3,932.50 $135.00 $4,387.50 60 Storm Drain Inlet Protection EA 42 150.00$ 6,300.00$ $225.00 $9,450.00 $271.61 $11,407.62 $200.00 $8,400.00 $225.00 $9,450.00 $150.00 $6,300.00 $184.00 $7,728.00 $350.00 $14,700.00 61 Sediment Control Log Type Wood Fiber LF 175 4.00$ 700.00$ $8.80 $1,540.00 $3.95 $691.25 $15.00 $2,625.00 $3.00 $525.00 $3.20 $560.00 $4.00 $700.00 $10.00 $1,750.00 62 Fertilizer Type 3 (350 LB/AC) LB 265 1.50$ 397.50$ $1.25 $331.25 $2.63 $696.95 $2.00 $530.00 $2.00 $530.00 $2.00 $530.00 $2.25 $596.25 $3.00 $795.00 63 Seeding ACRE 0.756 2,000.00$ 1,512.00$ $5,000.00 $3,780.00 $328.96 $248.69 $4,000.00 $3,024.00 $250.00 $189.00 $255.00 $192.78 $300.00 $226.80 $20,000.00 $15,120.00 64 Seed Mixture 25-131 (220 LB/AC) LB 83 4.00$ 332.00$ $10.00 $830.00 $8.88 $737.04 $8.00 $664.00 $7.00 $581.00 $7.00 $581.00 $8.00 $664.00 $8.00 $664.00 65 Seed Mixture 25-151 (120 LB/AC) LB 47 5.00$ 235.00$ $10.00 $470.00 $9.41 $442.27 $8.00 $376.00 $8.00 $376.00 $7.50 $352.50 $9.00 $423.00 $8.00 $376.00 66 Hydraulic Bonded Fiber Matrix (3500 LB/AC) LB 2640 1.50$ 3,960.00$ $4.40 $11,616.00 $2.47 $6,520.80 $2.00 $5,280.00 $2.00 $5,280.00 $2.00 $5,280.00 $2.10 $5,544.00 $2.00 $5,280.00 67 4" Solid Line: Epoxy LF 7168 0.75$ 5,376.00$ $0.46 $3,297.28 $0.71 $5,089.28 $1.00 $7,168.00 $1.00 $7,168.00 $0.60 $4,300.80 $0.42 $3,010.56 $0.75 $5,376.00 68 4" Broken Line: Epoxy LF 667 0.75$ 500.25$ $0.46 $306.82 $0.71 $473.57 $1.00 $667.00 $1.00 $667.00 $0.60 $400.20 $0.42 $280.14 $0.75 $500.25 69 Crosswalk: Epoxy SF 1500 5.00$ 7,500.00$ $4.50 $6,750.00 $7.58 $11,370.00 $8.00 $12,000.00 $5.00 $7,500.00 $6.30 $9,450.00 $4.10 $6,150.00 $8.00 $12,000.00 Bid Total:789,268.72$ 1,018,791.22$ 1,053,471.30$ 1,066,081.45$ 1,086,287.86$ 1,140,176.55$ 1,193,595.21$ 1,371,716.17$ Bituminous Roadways Inc. 7th Street & 57th Avenue Trail Project Owner: City of Fridley Bid Opening: 8/30/2022 9:00 AM Thomas and Sons Construction North Valley, Inc. New Look Contracting, Inc. Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.Engineer Estimate Urban Companies DBE Commitment = 5.0%DBE Commitment = 0.0%DBE Commitment = 15.0% DBE Commitment = 22.7% DBE Commitment = 22.7% DBE Commitment = 22.7% DBE Commitment = 8.5% 18 Item 5. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Ryan George, Deputy Director of Public Safety – Police Division Title Resolution No. 2022-103, Directing Public Safety Department to Enter Into Agreement and Authorizing Execution of Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety, Federal Grant Program Agreement for DWI Officer Background Minnesota Statute § 299A.01 Subd. 2 (4) authorizes the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS) to publish and award grant contracts to state agencies, local units of government, and other entities for programs that will benefit the safety of the public. The Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety, which is a division of DPS, provides a grant supporting full-time officers dedicated to DWI enforcement. Impaired driving poses a significant risk to people and property in the City of Fridley. Crashes involving impaired drivers account for approximately 25% of all fatal crashes in Minnesota. These crashes can destroy families, cause severe injuries, and have a significant financial and emotional impact on our community. The Fridley Public Safety Department is committed to removing impaired drivers from our roadways. The City of Fridley first applied for and was awarded the federal grant funding beginning on October 1, 2019 for Fiscal Year 2020. The grant was renewed on October 1, 2020 for Fiscal Year 2021 and again on October 1, 2021 for Fiscal Year 2022. The grant will renew again on October 1, 2022 for Fiscal Year 2023. The Fridley Public Safety Department desires to continue its partnership with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and enter into a grant agreement for the DWI Officer grant period from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. Financial Impact The dedicated DWI Officer’s salary and benefits will be reimbursed by the Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety in accordance with the Budget Summary attached to the Grant Contract Agreement (Exhibit A). Recommendation Staff recommend the approval of Resolution No. 2022-103 and completion of the Certification Regarding Lobbying (Exhibit B). 19 Item 6. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity X Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-103  Exhibit A: Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety, Grant Contract Agreement  Exhibit B: Certification Regarding Lobbying 20 Item 6. Resolution No. 2022-103 Directing Public Safety Department to Enter Into Agreement and Authorizing Execution of Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety, Federal Grant Program Agreement for DWI Officer Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 299A.01 Subd. 2 (4), the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety is authorized to publish and award grant contracts with state agencies, local units of government, and other entities for programs that will benefit the safety of the public; and Whereas, according to the Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety, approximately one out of every four fatalities on Minnesota roadways involves alcohol impairment; and Whereas, impaired drivers create an unreasonable risk to people and property in the City of Fridley; and Whereas, the National Highway Traffic Administration has a mandate to promote the safety of those who use public roadways and has approved funding for such programs; and Whereas, the Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety provides a grant supporting full-time officers dedicated to the enforcement of laws relating to DWI, distracted driving, speeding, and seat-belt use; and Whereas, the City of Fridley applied for and was awarded the federal grant funding beginning on October 1, 2022. Now, therefore be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby supports the grant and directs the Fridley Department of Public Safety to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for the DWI Officer grant period from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. Be it further resolved that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby authorizes the City Manager and Public Safety Director to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of Fridley Department of Public Safety and to be the fiscal agent and administer the grant. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day of September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor Attest: Melissa Moore – City Clerk 21 Item 6. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Roberta Collins, Assistant to the City Manager Title Resolution No. 2022-107, Designating Time and Number of City Council Meetings for 2023 Background Pursuant to Fridley City Charter § 3.01, the City Council annually adopts a calendar of City Council meetings and conference meetings for the upcoming year. Financial Impact None Recommendation Staff recommend the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-107. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship X Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-107  Draft 2023 City of Fridley Calendar 22 Item 7. Resolution No. 2022-107 Designating Time and Number of City Council Meetings for 2023 Whereas, the Fridley City Charter (Charter) § 3.01 requires the Fridley City Council to meet at a fixed time not less than once each month; and Whereas, the Charter § 3.01 requires the Fridley City Council to meet at such times as may be prescribed by resolution; and Whereas, it is the intent of the Fridley City Council to comply with the open meeting provisions contained in Minnesota Statutes 13D; Now, therefore be it resolved, by the City Council of the City of Fridley that: 1. The Fridley City Council will hold regular meetings in the Council Chambers of the Fridley Civic Campus, 7071 University Avenue N.E., commencing at 7:00 p.m. on the following dates in 2023: January 9, January 23, February 13, February 27, March 13, March 27, April 10, April 24, May 8, May 22, June 12, June 26, July 10, July 24, August 14, August 28, September 11, September 25, October 9, October 23, November 13, November 27, December 11 and December 18. 2. The City Council will hold conference meetings prior to regularly scheduled City Council meetings, except for the last City Council meeting in December. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor ATTEST: Melissa Moore - City Clerk 23 Item 7. IMPORTANT DATES JANUARY FEBRUARY January February SMTWTF S SMTWTF S 2 New Year's Day (Obs.)13 Conference Meeting 1234517 1234 9Conference Meeting City Council Meeting 89101112814 567891011 City Council Meeting 20 Presidents' Day 15 16 17 18 19 15 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 16 Martin Luther King Jr. Day 27 Conference Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 22 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 23 Conference Meeting City Council Meeting 29 30 31 26 27 28 City Council Meeting MARCH APRIL SMTWTF S SMTWTF S March April 1234 1 13 Conference Meeting 10 Conference Meeting 567891011 2345678 City Council Meeting City Council Meeting 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 27 Conference Meeting 17 Comm. App. Dinner 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 City Council Meeting 22 Town Hall Meeting 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 24 Conference Meeting 30 City Council Meeting MAY JUNE SMTWTF S SMTWTF S May June 123456 123 8Conference Meeting 12 Conference Meeting 78910111213 45678910 City Council Meeting City Council Meeting 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 22 Conference Meeting 26 Conference Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 City Council Meeting City Council Meeting 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 Memorial Day JULY AUGUST SMTWTF S SMTWTF S July August 1 12345 3 City Holiday 14 Conference Meeting 2345678 6789101112 4 Independence Day City Council Meetng 9 101112131415 13141516171819 10 Conference Meeting 28 Conference Meeting 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 City Council Meeting City Council Meeting 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 24 Conference Meeting 30 31 City Council Meeting SEPTEMBER OCTOBER SMTWTF S SMTWTF S September October 12 1234567 4 Labor Day 9Conference Meeting 3456789 891011121314 11 Conference Meeting City Council Meeting 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 City Council Meeting 23 Conference Meeting 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 Emp. App. Breakfast City Council Meeting 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 25 Conference Meeting City Council Meeting NOVEMBER DECEMBER November December SMTWTF S SMTWTF S 10 Veterans Day (Obs.)7 Annual Meeting 1234 12 13 Conference Meeting 11 Conference Meeting 567891011 3456789 City Council Meeting City Council Meeting 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 23 Thanksgiving 18 City Council Meeting 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 City Holiday 25 Christmas 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 Conference Meeting 31 City Council Meeting ‐ Holiday ‐ City Council Meeting ‐ Council Conference Meeting ‐ Other Meeting One floating holiday in addition to 11 holidays. 9/22/2022 2023 City of Fridley Calendar DRAFT 24 Item 7. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: James Kosluchar, Public Works Director Nic Schmidt, Civil Engineer Title Resolution No. 2022-108, Approve Agreement for Construction Management Services for Moore Lake Park Building Background On Thursday, September 1st, the Park System Improvement Plan Project Management Team comprised of Public Works and Parks & Recreation Staff, sent out a request for proposals (RFP) to three construction management consultants for the Moore Lake Park Building. The proposals were due Thursday, September 15th and subsequently reviewed. Staff were impressed with the response and level of quality of the proposals. The City of Fridley’s (City) Moore Lake Park is in a highly visible location off Central Avenue and Highway 65 and is scheduled for reconstruction in 2023. Council approved the Parks System Improvement Plan in April 2022 which included a transformative reconfiguration of the park. In addition to the park is a new building that will be a year-round use facility. Exhibit A includes a floor plan and exterior renderings. As shown, the south side of the building will be an enclosed, rentable space with a gathering area, serving kitchen, restrooms and a mechanical room. The north side of the building is a terraced, covered outdoor gathering area. Oertel Architects is designing the building and the City anticipates advertising for bids in November with award in December 2022. Construction would begin Spring 2023. Given the high visibility of the new building, staff recognized the need to employ a dedicated construction management team with experience delivering successful projects of this type and size. The RFP was structured around qualifications and experience, required services and a fee proposal (see attached). The construction manager as advisor (CMA) will be responsible for design input, cost estimating, constructability & phasing reviews, solicitation & review of bids, contract & project management, (sub) contractor oversight, construction quality management, and close out. Note that proposers were encouraged to provide fees and alternates (additions or deductions) for any supplemental or reduced services that would provide value to the City. Examples included part-time supervision, completion of the building and park site earthwork by a single contractor and development of project website content. Of these, part-time supervision and completion of the grading for the building and park earthwork by the same contractor are being considered as advantageous to the project. Ultimately with this contracting arrangement, the City will be more likely to guide the project within budget and the CM 25 Item 8. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. services will reduce or eliminate the amount of general contracting and special inspection/oversight services during construction. A weighted scoring system was implemented by Staff during review of the proposals. The proposers were instructed to breakdown the fee as appropriate for their prescribed schedule. Costs were competitive amongst the firms and a proposal summary is attached. Note Project approaches were similar. However there were two standout proposals. Staff scoring revealed a proposal from Kraus- Anderson Construction with many strengths and significant confidence they will deliver a successful project. Kraus-Anderson provided a base fee of $286,782 for up to $3 million in construction, with a construction fee of 1.95% in excess of the base amount. This fee compares competitively with other historic projects in Fridley. If approved, the attached AIA contract would be approved by both parties, with inclusion of any specifics after review with the City Attorney and concurrence of the City Manager. The schedule of construction management services would begin upon execution of the agreement. Financial Impact Funding is provided by bond proceeds through the Capital Investment Program. Recommendation Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 2022-108. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment x Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places x Community Identity & Relationship Building Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity x Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship x Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-108  Exhibit A – Request for Proposals  Exhibit B – Proposal Summary  Exhibit C – AIA Document C132-2019 26 Item 8. Resolution No. 2022-108 Approve Agreement for Construction Management Services for Moore Lake Park Building Whereas, the City of Fridley (City) began a process of understanding the needs and desires of residents for City parks improvements in 2019 called "Finding Your Fun in Fridley" by conducting public workshops with residents; and Whereas, Fridley residents expressed an interest in improving City parks by upgrading playgrounds and amenities; and Whereas, on April 25, 2022 the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-36, which approves the Park System Improvement Plan Final Report and authorizes staff to begin the implementation phase of the Plan; and Whereas, the Park System Improvement Plan includes construction of a building in Moore Lake Park budgeted at $3 million; and Whereas, staff has requested, received, and ranked three proposals received for construction management services related to the building and recommends Kraus-Anderson Construction to provide construction management services; Now, therefore be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves finalization and execution of an Agreement for Construction Management Services for the Moore Lake Park Building with Kraus-Anderson Construction in the amount of $286,782.00. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day of September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor Attest: Melissa Moore – City Clerk 27 Item 8. MMooree Lakee BBuilding Requestt forr Proposals September 1, 2022 Revised 9/12/2022 28 Item 8. Tuesday, September 13, 2022 Page 1 of 1 NOTICE OF ADDENDUM City of Fridley - Moore Lake Building Request for Proposals Revised Request for Proposals 1. The Request for Proposals has been revised as follows: A. Description of Project – Added Building Overview Section B. Description of Project – Added Project Requirements/Additional Information Section a. This project is subject to the most current prevailing wage rates (see attached Section 00 43 43 Wage Rate Form – Employment Requirements) b. The existing building will be demolished prior to the start of new building construction c. SWPPP to be prepared by City and inclusive of the building construction and park site work d. Draft geotechnical report is included in the appendix e. Anoka County Gardena Roundabout Project plans and schedule is included in the appendix f. City Biochar- and Iron-Enhanced Sand Filter Project plan and schedule in included in the appendix C. Required Services a. Revised Item 6, Management of Contracts, with reference to AIA Document A132-2019 b. Revised Item 8a, Contract & Construction Administration, to clarify full-time on-site supervision c. Revised Item 8j, Contract & Construction Administration, to include Viewpoint as an approved online documentation tool D. Fee Proposal a. Revised Fee Proposal to instruct Proposers to breakdown the proposed fee as appropriate for the required project phases and prescribed schedule. Proposers are encouraged to provide fees and alternates (deductions) for any supplemental or reduced services that would provide value to the project, owner, and public. Examples include part-time site supervision, completion of building and park site earthwork by single contractor, project website images/video, etc. E. Appendix a. Added appendix with the following documents: i. Building Floor Plan & Renderings ii. Section 00 43 43 Wage Rate Form – Employment Requirements iii. Draft Geotechnical Report iv. Anoka County Gardena Roundabout Project Plans & Schedule v. Biochar- and Iron-Enhanced Sand Filter Project Plan & Schedule 29 Item 8. Moore Lake Building Request for Proposals 1 Statement of Purpose The City of Fridley is seeking qualification and fee proposals for construction management as adviser for the new Moore Lake Building. The park is situated on East Moore Lake with access off Central Avenue, just north of I-694. In addition to a new building for community gathering, the existing park will undergo a transformative reconfiguration with new park features and amenities. A concept plan is shown below. Submission Requirements For your proposal to be considered, a submittal in digital format (PDF) must be received no later than 4:00 pm on Thursday, September 15, 2022. Proposals are to be limited to 30 page faces. Submittals are to be sent to the project representative with contact information as outlined below. Additionally, all questions can be sent to the project representative before the end of day Friday, September 9, 2022. Project Representative:Nic Schmidt / Email:nic.schmidt@fridleymn.gov / Ph:(763) 238-8058 30 Item 8. Moore Lake Building Request for Proposals 2 Proposal Process and Schedule Qualification and fee proposals will be submitted as outlined above and subsequently reviewed by the Project Team. Prior to submitting proposals, candidates will be invited for a brief 30-minute interview with the Project Team. Pre-proposal meetings will be scheduled between September 7th through September 9th. The intent of the interview is to overview project approach and discuss ideas on delivery.Note RFP questions are due at the end of day September 9th and an addendum will be issued no later than September 13th, if applicable. Solicitation for Proposals September 1, 2022 Pre-proposal Meeting Sept. 7 – Sept. 9, 2022 Proposals Due September 15, 2022 Contract Week of Sept. 19 Qualifications and Experience The City seeks to employ a dedicated team that has experience delivering successful projects of this type and size of building. It is desired that interested firms have the following qualifications and experience with their staff assigned as the Team to deliver the Project services: 1. Two or More Projects of Similar Size and Scope a. Examples i. Public Projects ii. Park Building Projects iii. Park Reconstruction & Development Projects iv. Project Cost (Pre- & Post-Construction) b. Project Team i. Project Manager / Management Structure & Key Personnel ii. On-Site Supervision & Key Personnel c. Project Approach i. Review of Design Deliverables ii. Team Integration with Design Team iii. Cost Estimating iv. Constructability & Phasing Reviews v. Construction Quality Management Description of Project Building Overview The new park building will be a year-round use facility. The attached exhibit includes a floor plan and exterior renderings. As shown, the south side of the building will be an enclosed, rentable space with a gathering area, serving kitchen, restrooms and a mechanical room. The 31 Item 8. Moore Lake Building Request for Proposals 3 north side of the building is a terraced, covered outdoor gathering area. Utilities to the new building will be served from Central Avenue, including water, sewer, gas, electric and fiber. The City anticipates advertising for bids in November with award in December 2022. Construction would begin Spring 2023, at the latest. Project Requirements/Additional Information 1. This project is subject to the most current prevailing wage rates (see attached Section 00 43 43 Wage Rate Form – Employment Requirements) 2. The existing building will be demolished prior to the start of new building construction 3. SWPPP to be prepared by City and inclusive of the building construction and park site work 4. Draft geotechnical report is included in the appendix 5. Anoka County Gardena Roundabout Project plans and schedule is included in the appendix 6. City Biochar- and Iron-Enhanced Sand Filter Project plan and schedule in included in the appendix Required Services 1. Cost Evaluation 2. Bid Packages 3. City to Provide Front-End Documents, Including Incorporation of City Legal Requirements a. Development and integration of bid divisions in cooperation with the bid packages as required to meet the prescribed project approach and facilitate design, award and construction. 4. Advertising for Bids & Solicitation a. City to publish advertisement for bids b. Construction Manager to author & assist 5. Review of Bid Results & Development of Contracts for Council Award 6. Management of Contracts (See attached AIA Document A132-2019) 7. Self-Performance of Work is not Permitted 8. Contract & Construction Administration a. Full-time on-site supervision b. Project management services c. On-site inspection of work performed d. Review of shop drawings & coordination of all submittals e. Preparation & review of cost changes f. Preparation & review of contractor payment requests g. Compilation of project closeout documents & contract completion h. Coordination of benchmarking and startup 32 Item 8. Moore Lake Building Request for Proposals 4 i. Conduct periodic, on-site construction progress meetings with critical contactors in attendance for the benefit of Architect and Owner update & review of work j. Use of online documentation tool: Procore, Viewpoint, or equal 9. Represent City as purchasing agent Fee Proposal The Construction Manager is to breakdown the proposed fee as appropriate for the required project phases and prescribed schedule. Proposers are encouraged to provide fees and alternates (deductions) for any supplemental or reduced services that would provide value to the project, owner, and public. Examples include part-time site supervision, completion of building and park site earthwork by single contractor, project website images/video, etc. 33 Item 8. APPENDIX Building Floor Plan & Renderings Section 00 43 43 Wage Rate Form – Employment Requirements Draft Geotechnical Report Anoka County Gardena Roundabout Project Plans & Schedule Biochar- and Iron-Enhanced Sand Filter Project Plan & Schedule AIA Document A132-2019 34 Item 8. 0'5' 10' 15' DN DN D N KITCHEN STAFFSTORAGE/KITCHEN OUTDOOR GATHERING RESTROOM RESTROOM RESTROOMRESTROOM ENTRY INDOOR GATHERING LAKE SIDE PARKING SIDE STORAGE/MECHANICAL 100'-0" 99'-0" 98'-0" 97'-0" F.F.E 884.33 F.F.E 883.33 F.F.E 882.33 F.F.E 881.33 100'-0" F.F.E 884.33 2,150 SF 267 SF 182 SF 80 SF 64 SF 61 SF 61 SF405 SF 366 SF 61 SF 72 SF 4,145 SF 80 ' - 9 12" 87 ' - 3 3 4" 51'-8" 46'-5 1 4" 5'-0" 1 FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0" PLOTTED:FILE NAME:8-25-2022 SIGNATURE XXXX XX, XXXX MMP ANC PROJECT NUMBER: DATE ISSUED: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS: PROJECT NAME: FRIDLEY, MN 22-25 MOORE LAKE PARK FACILITY SHEET NO: DATE SHEET NAME: xr-2225_p1.dwg LICENSE # I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1795 ST. CLAIR AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55105 (651) 696-5186 www.oertelarchitects.com OERTEL ARCHITECTS NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N FLOOR PLAN 35 Item 8. Wage Rate and Employment Requirements 00 43 43 - 1 00 43 43 WAGE RATE FORM – EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS E-1 PREAMBLE It is in the public interest that public works projects be constructed and maintained by the best means and the highest quality of labor reasonably available and that persons working on public works be compensated according to the real value of the services they perform. Therefore, the City of Fridley will administer this Contract according to the provisions set forth in Minn. Stat. §§ 177.41 - 177.44 and 6 MCAR 5200.1120. E-2 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Because the City requires and follows a policy of Affirmative Action and will not tolerate discriminatory acts, Contractor shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of age, sex, religious beliefs, political affiliations, or other protected classifications under federal, state, or local laws or regulations. E-3 LABOR PROVISIONS The Contractor shall have copies of these Specifications on file at the job headquarters, and shall post a notice, approved by the Engineer, in a conspicuous place at the site of the work, informing employees that these provisions are available for their inspection. If a job headquarters is not provided, the Contractor shall provide an individual copy to each employee on the City job. A copy of the submitted notice will be provided to the City Engineer. E-4 MINIMUM WAGE RATES 1. The minimum hourly rates of wages required to be paid for all hours worked to the various laborers and mechanics employed by the Contractor and subcontractors under the Contract shall be an amount equal to the sum of the basic hourly rate plus applicable fringe benefits as certified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for State Funded Construction Projects. The wage rates for this contract are hereby established and incorporated as found on the date bids are opened at the following website address: http://workplace.doli.state.mn.us/prevwage/highway.php. The rates for Anoka County (Region 9) apply to this contract. 2. “Prevailing wage rate” means the hourly basic rate of pay plus the contribution for health and welfare benefits, vacation benefit, pension benefits, and any other economic benefit. Minn. Stat. § 177.42, Subd. 6. 3. The laborer or mechanic must be paid at least the prevailing wage rate in the same or most similar trade or occupation in the area as provided by the Commissioner of Labor and Industry Master Job Classification. Minn. Stat. § 177.44, Subd. 3 and 4. 4. If a construction project extends into more than one area, there shall be only one standard of hours of labor and wage rates for the entire project Minn. Stat. § 177.44, Subd. 4. 36 Item 8. Wage Rate and Employment Requirements 00 43 43 - 2 5. The City of Fridley shall apply classifications of labor, as listed under 6 MCAR 5200.1100 - Master Job Classifications. Under Standard Specifications for Construction S.S. - 1906, the City of Fridley shall withhold such amounts as may be needed to protect the City’s interest in consideration of charges or assessments against the Contractor, whether arising from this Contract or any other Contract with the City. 6. The wage rates contained in the Contract and MnDOT’s poster titled “Notice to Workers” (Tp- 02126-03) must be kept posted on the project work site by the Contractor in at least one conspicuous place for the information of all the employees working on the project. Minn. Stat. § 177.44, Subd. 5. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to obtain a copy of the current wage schedule from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry prior to bidding. 7. Apprentice A. Establishment of wage rates. Apprentices working on state projects are not subject to the prevailing wage rate determination, except as they may be affected by registered apprenticeship agreements. The hourly rates of pay for such workers are established by the particular program to which the apprentice or trainee is subject. 6 MCAR 5200.1070, Subp. 1. B. The term “apprentice” means: 1. A person employed and registered in a bona fide apprenticeship program registered with the U.S. Department of Labor or with the same apprentice agency, and 2. A person in the first 90 days of probationary employment as an apprentice who is not registered in the program but who has been certified by the U.S. Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training or state apprenticeship agency or council to be eligible for a probationary employment as an apprentice. 6 MCAR 5200.1070, Subp. 2. C. Any employee listed on a payroll for a state project that does not fall within the term “apprentice” defined above shall be paid the prevailing wage rate for the classification of work performed. E-5 PREVAILING HOURS OF LABOR The Prevailing Wages for State Funded Construction Contracts issued by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, which are available from the Department of Labor and Industry, set forth the Prevailing Hours of Labor as eight (8) hours per day and 40 hours per week. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 177.44, Subdivision 1, employees may not be permitted or required to work longer than the Prevailing Hours of Labor unless the employee is paid for all hours in excess of the prevailing hours at a rate of at least 1-1/2 times his/her hourly basic rate of pay; nor shall he/she be paid a lesser rate of wages than the prevailing wage rate in the same or most similar trade or occupation in the area. E-6 REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS 37 Item 8. Wage Rate and Employment Requirements 00 43 43 - 3 These contract provisions all apply to all work performed on the contract by the Contractor with his/her own organization and with the assistance of workmen under his/her immediate supervision and to all work performed on the contract by piecework, station work or by subcontract. The Contractor shall insert in each of his/her subcontracts all stipulations contained in these Required Contract Provisions and also a clause requiring his/her subcontractors to include these Required Contract Provisions in any lower tier subcontracts which they may enter into, together with a clause requiring the inclusion of these provisions in any further subcontracts that may in turn be made. The Required Contract Provisions shall in no instance be incorporated by reference. The breach of any of the stipulations contained in these Required Contract Provisions may be grounds for termination of the contract. E-7 STATEMENTS AND PAYROLLS 1. The Contractor and all subcontractors shall provide information, based on the Contractor’s employee payment schedule, to the Project Engineer. Minn. Stat. § 177.44, Subd. 1. 2. The Contractor and all subcontractors may provide the following types of payroll information to the City to satisfy this requirement. Payroll information need not include all the listed information below, but failure to provide the listed information may delay payment of funds or result in additional inquiries. A. The employee’s full name, address, and social security number. The employee’s address and social security number need only appear on the first payroll on which their name appears. B. The employee’s classification as defined under 5200.1100 Master Job Classifications. C. Entries showing the employee’s basic hourly wage rate, including any fringe benefits amounts paid in cash. The payroll should show separately the amounts contributed on behalf of the employee to “bona fide” fringe benefit funds and/or programs. D. The employees daily and weekly hours worked in each classification, including overtime hours worked. E. The itemized deductions made. F. The net wages paid. 3. The Contractor and subcontractor shall submit, along with the payroll information, a statement specifying that the individual signing the statement attest that the information on the payrolls is true and correct. The statement shall specify that the willful falsification of any information on the payroll may result in civil or criminal prosecution. Contractors may attach to the payroll MnDOT’s form 21658. 4. The City of Fridley may examine all Contractor and subcontractor records related to hours of work and the wages paid to laborers and mechanics working on the project. Minn. Stat. § 177.44, Subd. 7. The City of Fridley may interview Contractor and subcontractor employees during work hours on the project. 38 Item 8. Wage Rate and Employment Requirements 00 43 43 - 4 5. The City of Fridley shall require adherence to the state prevailing wage law. As such, the City of Fridley will withhold funds sufficient to protect the City’s interest in the implementation of these Specifications against the Contractors as provided for under Section 1906, Standard Specification for Construction. Minn. Stat. § 177.44, Subd. 7. E-8 PREVAILING WAGE STATEMENT The City of Fridley finds it to be in the best interest of its citizens that buildings and public works projects constructed with City funds be constructed and maintained by the best means and highest quality of labor reasonably available, and that persons working under contract on buildings and public works constructed in whole or in part with City funds should be compensated according to the real value of the services they perform which, for purposes of this Contract, is defined as the prevailing wage and hours of employment as determined for the City by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 177.42, subd. 6. E-9 PAYROLL CERTIFICATION The Contractor shall submit certification that he has complied with this section of the specifications before the final payment will be made. Copies of weekly payroll statements may be required by the Owner. E-10 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT The undersigned hereby states that (he) (she) (it) is in full compliance with Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act, M.S.A. 176.01 et. seq., and gives this Statement as evidence thereof as per Minnesota Statutes, Section 176.182. The undersigned hereby states that (he) (she) (it) carries workers compensation insurance in the amount of $ ___________ in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 176.181(2). The undersigned hereby states that if (he) (she) (it) is exempt from the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act for the following reason(s): That the only persons engaged in the businesses are: _____The partners, their spouses, parents or children, regardless of age; or _____The executive officer, who owns more than 25% of the stock, his or her spouse, parents or children, regardless of age, of a closely held corporation with less than 22,880 hours of payroll per year; or _____Persons whose employment is casual, and not in the usual course of the trade, business, profession or occupation of the undersigned; or _____Persons employed by the corporation where those persons are related by blood or marriage, within the third degree of kindred according to the rules of civil law; to all of the officers of the corporation and the corporation has filed a written election with the Commissioner of Labor and Industry to have those persons excluded from the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act; or 39 Item 8. Wage Rate and Employment Requirements 00 43 43 - 5 _____Other: (Cite Legal Authority) _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ The undersigned shall indemnify, defend and hold the City of Fridley harmless from any and all damages and claims that may arise by reason of any injury to the undersigned,(his) (her) (its) agents or employees, in the performance of the contract with the City; and in case any action is brought therefore against the City of Fridley, the undersigned shall assume full responsibility for the defense thereof, and upon (his) (her) (its) failure to do so on proper notice, the City of Fridley reserves the right to defend such action and to charge all costs thereof to the undersigned. In furtherance of this statement of compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 176.182, the undersigned the attached certificate of workers’ compensation insurance that provides the name of the insurance company, the policy number and dates of coverage or the attached copy of the permit to self- insure. Dated this _______ day of ___________________________, 2022. _________________________________________________ Contracting Firm Name _________________________________________________ Signature _________________________________________________ Title _________________________________________________ Address _________________________________________________ City State Zip _________________________________________________ Telephone Number CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Dated this _______ day of ___________________________, 2022. 40 Item 8. Wage Rate and Employment Requirements 00 43 43 - 6 _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of _____________________________, 2022. _____________________________________________________ END OF SECTION 00 43 43 41 Item 8. American Engineering Testing 5548 Barthel Industrial Drive NE, Suite 500 Albertville, MN 55301 TeamAET.com • 800.792.6364 Geotechnical Ɣ Materials Forensic Ɣ Environmental Building Technology Petrography/Chemistry REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION Moore Lake Park Building 5890 Central Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota AET Project No. P-0010684 Date: August 3, 2022 Prepared for: City of Fridley Dr a f aft AvenAv nnesota nnesota ET Project No. P-001068oject No. P-001068 Date: August 3Date: August 3 42 Item 8. 5548 Barthel Industrial Drive NE, Suite 500 | Albertville, MN 55301 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | teamAET.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. August 3, 2022 City of Fridley 7071 University Avenue N Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attn: Nic Schmidt RE: Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building 5890 Central Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota AET Report No. P-0010684 Dear Mr. Schmidt: American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to present the results of our subsurface exploration program and geotechnical engineering review for your Moore Lake Park Building project in Fridley, Minnesota. These services were performed according to our proposal to you dated March 1, 2022. We are submitting one electronic (.pdf) copy of the report to you. Please contact me if you have any questions about the report. I can also be contacted for arranging construction observation and testing services. Sincerely, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Kevin B. Beidelman Geologist I kbeidelman@teamAET.com Mobile: (763) 244-5413 Dr a f t is pleased to presentased to presen the reere engineering review for yoring review for your services were performed accwere performed acc onic (.pdf() copy of the report tcopy of the report t ou have any questions abouu have any questions a observation and testing servobservation and testing ser ing, Inc. ing, Inc. g, 43 Item 8. 5548 Barthel Industrial Drive NE, Suite 500 | Albertville, MN 55301 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | teamAET.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. SIGNATURE PAGE Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Fridley American Engineering Testing, Inc. 7071 University Avenue N 5548 Barthel Industrial Drive NE, Suite 500 Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Albertville, Minnesota 55301 (651) 659-9001/www.TeamAET.com Attn: Nic Schmidt Authored by: Reviewed by: Kevin B. Beidelman Robert J. Olson, PE (MN) Geologist Branch Manager I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Minnesota Statute Section 326.02 to 326.15 Name: Robert J. Olson Date: August 3, 2022 License #: 45023 DrDr a f t d by: by merrican Engineerinican Enginee 5548 BarthelBarthe Industrial Dndustr Albertville, Minnesota 553ville, Minnesota 553 (651) 659-9001/www.Te51) 659-9001/www.Te RevieweReview D 44 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ..................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 1 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING ............................................................... 2 4.1 Field Exploration Program ......................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Laboratory Testing ..................................................................................................................... 2 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 2 5.1 Surface Observations ................................................................................................................ 2 5.2 Subsurface Soils/Geology .......................................................................................................... 3 5.3 Groundwater .............................................................................................................................. 4 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 5 6.1 Approach Discussion ................................................................................................................. 5 6.2 Building Grading ........................................................................................................................ 5 6.3 Foundation Design ..................................................................................................................... 7 6.4 Floor Slab Design ...................................................................................................................... 8 6.5 Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 8 6.6 Exterior Building Backfilling ...................................................................................................... 10 6.7 Pavements ............................................................................................................................... 11 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................... 14 7.1 Potential Difficulties .................................................................................................................. 14 7.2 Excavation Backsloping ........................................................................................................... 15 7.3 Observation and Testing .......................................................................................................... 15 8.0 ASTM STANDARDS ........................................................................................................ 15 9.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................. 15 Dr a f t ............. ...................................... ......................................................... ............................................................................... ......................................................................... ........................................................................... .................................................................................... ................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ............................................................................................ ........................................................................................... kfilling ........................kfilling ................... .......................................... RATIORATI 45 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page iii STANDARD SHEETS Floor Slab Moisture/Vapor Protection Freezing Weather Effects on Building Construction Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction Bituminous Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Design Definitions Relating to Utility Construction Bedding/Foundation Support of Buried Pipe Utility Excavation Backfilling APPENDIX A – Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System Figure 1 - Boring Locations Subsurface Boring Logs APPENDIX B – Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Dr a f t ons and Guidelines for Use Guidelines for Use 46 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 1 of 15 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Fridley proposing to construct a new park building at Moore Lake Park in Fridley, Minnesota. To assist planning and design, you have authorized American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) to conduct a subsurface exploration program at the site, conduct soil laboratory testing, and perform a geotechnical engineering review for the project. This report presents the results of the above services and provides our engineering recommendations based on this data. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AET's services were performed according to our proposal to you dated March 1, 2022, which you authorized on March 2, 2022. On May 26, 2022 you authorized up to 2 additional soil borings to define the extents of buried organics. The authorized scope consists of the following. x Drilling 12 standard penetration test borings to depths of 14½ feet. x Performing soil laboratory testing. x Performing a geotechnical engineering review based on the data and preparing this report. These services are intended for geotechnical purposes only. The scope is not intended to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination in the soil or groundwater. 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION We understand that the city of Fridley (the City) is proposing to construct a new park building at Moore Lake Park in Fridley, Minnesota. The proposed building will be 1 story in height and approximately 2,650 square feet in size. It will be a slab on grade, steel framed structure with a flat steel or wood framed roof that will possibly support a roof deck. Building finished floor elevations were not provided. Building load information was not provided; however, based on our experience with similar structures, we estimate the bearing wall loads will range from about 2 to 4 kips per lineal foot and maximum column loads will not exceed 50 kips. We assume floor loads to be approximately 100 to 150 pounds per square foot (psf). These loads will be confirmed for the final report. A proposed driveway and parking lot will be constructed adjacent to the new building. The driveway is anticipated to be a bituminous surface with traffic anticipated to be primarily for light trucks and an occasional larger garbage or delivery truck. We expect the pavements will experience axle loads of 4 to 10 tons. Dr a f t osal to yoosal to yo you authorized uou authorize horized scope consiszed scope con ts borings to depths of 14½ fees to depths of 14½ fe g. ngineering reing review based onew based ed for geotechnical purposeed for geotechnical purpos or exteor ex nt of environmental cenvironmenta ORMATION ORMA f Frf Fridley (the idley (the nnesotannesota 47 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 2 of 15 Our foundation design assumptions include a minimum factor of safety of 3 with respect to the ultimate bearing capacity. We assume the structure will be able to tolerate total settlements of up to 1 inch, and differential settlements over a 30-foot distance of up to ½ inch. The above stated information represents our understanding of the proposed construction. This information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us if there are changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our recommendations are appropriate. 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING 4.1 Field Exploration Program The subsurface exploration program conducted for the project consisted of (12) standard penetration test borings. The client determined the number of borings, boring locations, and boring depths. The logs of the borings and details of the methods used appear in Appendix A. The logs contain information concerning soil layering, soil classification, geologic origins, and moisture condition. A density description or consistency is also noted for the natural soils, which is based on the standard penetration resistance (N-value). The boring locations are shown on Figure 1 in Appendix A. The borings were located in the field by AET personnel by taping from nearby site features. Surface elevations were measured in the field by AET personnel using an engineer's level. The benchmark reference was the top nut of hydrant located in the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Cardena Avenue. This benchmark has an elevation of 889.83 feet, as provided by the City of Fridley. 4.2 Laboratory Testing The laboratory test program included water content testing and organic content testing. The test results appear in Appendix A on the individual boring logs adjacent to the samples upon which they were performed, or on the data sheets following the logs. 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS 5.1 Surface Observations The existing parcel is currently a city park along Moore Lake. The park includes a beach, playground, tennis and basketball courts, bituminous paved parking area, and a small park building along the beach. The site of the proposed new park building is within the existing paved parking area and existing park building. The park building and a portion of the existing pavement Dr a f t TING ed for the project consr the project cons ned the number of number borings, orings, d details of the methods usels of the method ng soil layeayering, soil classificring, soil classif ption or consistency is also nr consistency is also tion resistance (N-value). sistance (N-value). hown on Figure 1 in Appenown on Figure 1 in A dix ping from ping fr nearby site featuresrby site featu using an engineer's level.using an engineer's level southeast corner ofsoutheast corner ofof 889.83 feet, 889.83 feetff 48 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 3 of 15 will be removed for the new construction. The site is relatively flat with a slight downward slope from south to north. Elevations at our soil borings ranged from 881.7 feet at Borings SB-2 and SB-6 down to 880.5 feet at Borings SB-3 and SB-9. 5.2 Subsurface Soils/Geology 5.2.1 General Profile The generalized soil profile shown by the logs of the borings consists of topsoil, fill, or possible fill over coarse alluvial sands and till to the depth of termination. We also found buried swamp deposits at six of the boring locations. 5.2.2 Fill or Possible Fill Fill or possible fill soils were encountered at the surface of all borings to depths of about 2 to 4½ feet beneath existing grade. Bituminous pavement with gravel aggregate base was also encountered in all borings, except SB-3, SB-7, SB-11, and SB-12, overlaying fill soils. The possible fill, which was classified as ‘Till or Fill’, was encountered in Boring SB-9. We could not determine the geological origin based on the recovered samples. The fill and possible fill soils are primarily clayey sands, sandy lean clays, silty sands, gravelly silty sands, sands with silt, and sands with various amounts of gravel and organics. These soils were mostly frozen to depths of 4 to 6 feet at the time of drilling. These soils are moderate to slow draining and susceptible to freeze-thaw movements. Due to the undocumented placement and presence of the organic fines, we judge that these soils were not placed and compacted for structural support. 5.2.3 Swamp Deposit Swamp deposits were encountered in Borings SB-1, SB-2, SB-4, SB-6, SB-11, and SB-12. The swamp deposits were discovered at 4 ½ to 7 feet below existing grade with thicknesses ranging from 2 ½ to 5 feet and over 8 feet in SB-2. Total thickness was not discovered in SB-2 as the boring terminated within the organic clay. The swamp deposits consist primarily of clay with various amounts of organics, silty sand with organics, and sapric peat with sand. The sapric peat soils are slow draining and highly susceptible to freeze-thaw movements. Due to the high moisture contents and presence of the organics, we judge these soils to have low strength and be highly compressible under structural loads. The silty sand with organic fines are moderately slow draining and moderately susceptible to freeze thaw movements. We judge these soils to have moderate strength and slightly compressible under structural loads. 5.2.4 Coarse Alluvium Coarse alluvial sands were found overlaying the swamp deposits in SB-1, SB-2, SB-11, and SB- Dr a f t surface of all borings to ce of all borings avement with gravel aggrwith gravel aggree SB-7, SB-11, and SB-12, SB-11, and S l or Fill’, was encounteredwas encountered in i ed on the recovee recovered samplesred sampl y lean clays, slays, silty sands, grailty sands, gr unts of gravel and organiravel and organics. cs. e time of drilling. These soe time of drilling. These s aw movements. Duw movements. D e to the ue to th dge that tdge th hese soils were noils were no red in Bored in Bo atat 44 49 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 4 of 15 12, and overlaying the till soils in SB-4, SB-5, SB-6, and SB-7. The coarse alluvial soils consist of silty sands, sands with silt, and sands. The coarse alluvial soils contain variable amounts of gravel. These alluvial soils range from very loose to medium dense and are judged to have moderate to moderately high strength and moderate to low compressibility under the anticipated structural loads. The sands and sands with silt are fast draining and are judged to have low susceptibility to freeze-thaw movements. The silty sands are moderately fast draining and are frost susceptible. 5.2.5 Till Till soils were encountered in all borings except in Boring SB-2 due to termination in the swamp deposits. The till soils consist of clayey sands and sandy lean clay with a little gravel. These soils had an N-value of 2 to 29 blows per foot. The water content ranged from 14 to 24%. We judge the till to have high strength and low compressibility. These soils are slow draining and frost susceptible. 5.3 Groundwater We encountered groundwater while drilling in Boring SB-1, SB-2, SB-4, SB-5, SB-11, and SB- 12. Groundwater was measured at depths ranging from about 7 feet to 12½ feet. Based on these measured groundwater levels, it is estimated that they range in elevation from about 869.1 feet to 873.9 feet. Borings SB-3, SB-6, SB-7, SB-8, SB-9 and SB-10 encountered wet soils at depths from 5 ½ to 14½ feet, respectively; however, groundwater was not measured at the completion of the boring. The wet soils encountered could be due to a perched groundwater. Perched water occurs when water becomes trapped in faster draining soils between or above slower draining silty soils. The wet soils could also reflect the long-term groundwater level; additional time may have been required over the time of drilling for the water to stabilize in the borehole. Groundwater levels fluctuate due to varying seasonal and annual rainfall and snow melt amounts, as well as other factors. The groundwater level will also be influenced by the adjacent Moore Lake. The water level of Moore Lake was measured at 877.7 feet in elevation. The Minneapolis metro area has been in a low precipitation pattern for the last 2 years and the presently observed ground water levels may be lower than normal. Dr a f t SB-2S andy lean candy lean e water content rawater conten mpressisibility. These soilsbility. These soil drilling in Boring SB-1, g in Boring SB-1, SB-SB at depths ranging from abopths ranging from a levels, it is estimatevels, it is estim ed that thethat the B-7, SB-8,B-7, S SB-9 and SB-1and SB-1 wever, groundwater wwever, groundwat uld be due to auld be due to r drainingr draining ngng 50 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 5 of 15 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Approach Discussion As discussed, the soil profile at this site consists of fill, possible fill, buried swamp deposits, alluvial soils, and till. Based on our review of the soil conditions at the boring locations it is our opinion that the surficial soils, possible fill, and underlying swamp deposits are not suitable to support the proposed building in their present condition. The proposed Moore Park Building location is west and south of the borings containing swamp deposits. Because of the depths of the organic soils, it is our judgment that an excavation and refill operation may be cost prohibitive if the building will be located in the areas with buried swamp deposits; we have not given recommendations for this alternative for pricing information. Our recommendations are for the building location in the area of existing fills and near Boring SB-12, south of the area where we found buried sapric peat organic soils. Please contact us if the proposed building location changes; this may affect our recommendations. Based on the soil conditions encountered at our boring locations and on the design information that is available, it is our opinion that the building can be supported on conventional spread footings after removing the fill, possible fill, and organic sapric peat swamp deposits (if present) to the underlying, silty sand wit organic fines, less than 3% organic content, alluvial sands or till and placing engineered fill to attain building subgrade elevation We recommend that full-time observation and testing services be provided by a Geotechnical Engineer/Technician during stripping of the near surface soils and excavation of the previously placed fill with observation of all exposed soils prior to placing new fill or concrete. Details of our recommendations for site preparation are as follows. 6.2 Building Grading 6.2.1 Excavation To prepare the building area for foundation and slab support, we recommend complete excavation of the fill, possible fill, and organic sapric peat swamp deposits (if present), thereby exposing the silty sand wit organic fines, less than 3% organic content, alluvial sands and/or till. Any existing building foundations, slabs, and utilities should also be removed from within the building footprint and associated foundation oversize. This would result in excavation depths at the boring locations as shown in Table 6.2.1. Dr a f t ef swamsw mation. Our rmation. Ou ar Boring SB-12, soBoring SB-12 se contact us if the propact us if the prop ons. red at our ur boring locations aboring locations a that the building can be supe building can be su ossible fill, and organifill, and organ c saprisap wit organic fines, less it organic fines,than 3%than 3% l to attain building subgrade eto attain building subg ll-time observation and tell-time observation a g stripping of the neg stripping of the all exposed sall exposed s 51 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 6 of 15 Table 6.2.1 – Recommended Excavation Depths Boring Location Surface Elevation (ft) Excavation Depth (ft) Approximate Excavation Elevation (ft) SB-3 880.5 4 876½ SB-4 881.2 9½ 872 SB-5 881.3 4½ 877 SB-6 881.7 8 874 SB-7 880.7 4½ 876½ SB-8 881.3 7 874½ SB-9 880.5 4½ (7**) 876 (873½) SB-10 881.4 4½ 877 SB-11 880.8 4½*** (9½) 876 (871½) SB-12 881.0 2*** (9½) 879 (871½) * Rounded to the nearest ½ foot. **Possible Fill ***Perform test pits to confirm swamp deposit has low enough organic content and can remain in place beneath footings. The depth/elevation indicated in Table 6.2.1 is based on the soil condition at the specific boring location. Since conditions will vary away from the boring location, it is recommended that AET geotechnical personnel observe and confirm the competency of the soils in the entire excavation bottom prior to new fill or footing placement. Where the excavation extends below foundation grade, the excavation bottom and resultant engineered fill system must be oversized laterally beyond the planned outside edges of the foundations to properly support the loads exerted by that foundation. This excavation/engineered fill lateral extension should at least be equal to the vertical depth of fill needed to attain foundation grade at that location (i.e., 1:1 lateral oversize). 6.2.2 Fill Placement and Compaction Fill placed to attain grade for foundation and floor support should be compacted in thin lifts, such that the entire lift achieves a minimum compaction level of 98% of the standard maximum dry unit weight per ASTM:D698 (Standard Proctor test). Fill soils should be placed and compacted at water contents within ±3% of the respective optimum water contents, based on the respective Standard Proctor tests in lifts of 8 inches or less. Some drying or wetting of the fill may be needed at the time of placement. The excavated onsite fill soils and alluvial soils can be used as structural fill provided they are free of rubble or organic matter. If additional fill material is required for grading, we recommend Dr a f t ½ (7**) ½ (7**) t4½ 4½ftft4½*** (9½) ½*** (9½ftft2*** (9½) ** (9½) ftaftftft**Perform test pits to confirm swm test pits to conr h footings. s. able 6.2.1 is based on the so2.1 is based on the so vary away from ay fro the boring loboring lo erve and confirm the comrve and confirm the competepete footing placement. footing placement. extends below foundatiextends below foun st be st be oversized laoversized t the loads et the loads e t be et be e 52 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 7 of 15 importing sands or sands with silt meeting MnDOT 3149.2.B.2 Select Granular Borrow, with less than 8% passing the number 200 sieve, similar to the existing site soils. If a different material is proposed, samples should be submitted to AET for review. It is not within our scope to determine how much existing fill soil is available for re-use. If fill is placed at or below the groundwater level, the fill should be sand with less than 3% passing the number 200 sieve and no more than 40% passing the number 40 sieve. We recommend that this type of fill be used up to elevation 878 feet. The excavation should be dewatered to allow for fill placement in an excavation free of standing water. Frozen soils should not be used as fill and fill should not be placed over frozen soils. If there are areas where fill is placed on slopes, we recommend benching the sloped surface (benches cut parallel to the slope contour) prior to placing the fill. Benching is recommended where slopes are steeper than 4:1 (H: V). Please refer to the standard data sheets at the end of this report titled “Excavation and Refilling for Structural Support” for general information regarding excavation and fill placement for foundation support. Also refer to the sheet titled “Freezing Weather Effects on Building Construction” for general information regarding site grading and construction during the winter. 6.3 Foundation Design The structure can be supported on conventional spread foundations placed on the natural alluvial soils, till, or newly compacted fill. We recommend perimeter foundations for heated building space is placed such that the bottom is a minimum of 48 inches below exterior grade. We recommend foundations for unheated building space (such as canopy foundations) be extended to a minimum of 60 inches below exterior grade. All foundation bases should be surface compacted with a large plate compacter or vibratory roller prior to foundation placement. Based on the conditions encountered, it is our opinion the building foundations can be designed based on a net maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. It is our judgment this design pressure will have a factor of safety of at least 3 against the ultimate bearing capacity. The footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches for strip footings and 36 inches for column footings to avoid disproportionally small footing sizes. We judge that total settlements under this loading should not exceed 1 inch. We also judge that differential settlements of conditions depicted by the borings should not exceed ½ inch. Dr a f t be pla e rerecommend becommend to placing the fill. Benplacing the fill. s at the end of this reporend of this report titlet tit information regarding excaon regarding ex to the sheet tisheet t tled “Freezinled “Freezi mation regarding site gradingegarding site grading ign gn supported on conventionasupported on convention yy compacted fill. Wcompacted fill. h that the bottoh that the bott or unheaor unhea cheche 53 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 8 of 15 6.4 Floor Slab Design After completion of the earthwork recommended in Section 6.2, it is our judgement that the floor slab can be supported by the new compacted fill soils. The backfill around the foundations and interior utility trenches should be placed in thin lifts, with each lift compacted using vibratory or impact equipment, to at least 95% of the standard maximum dry unit weight per ASTM: D698. The fill should be placed in lifts thin enough to attain the specified compaction level throughout the entire lift thickness. For constructability purposes, we recommend placement at least 5 inches of Class 5 aggregate base (meeting MnDOT Specification 3138) immediately below the floor. We recommend designing the floor slab using a Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k-value) of 200 pci if placed on at least 5 inches of aggregate base. If less than 5 inches of aggregate base is constructed, a k- value of 150 pci should be used for slab design. For recommendations pertaining to moisture and vapor protection of interior floor slabs, we refer you to the attached standard sheet entitled “Floor Slab Moisture/Vapor Protection.” Typically, most floor covering installers require the vapor retarder to be placed directly below the concrete slab for warranty purposes. 6.5 Utilities Excavation for underground utility construction will likely extend into the primarily clayey and silty sand fill soils; the naturally-deposited sandy soils (coarse alluvium); and the organic swamp deposits in some portions of the project. Where clayey/silty soils or organic soils are present at the pipe invert in areas where open trench installations are used, the soil at the bottom of the trench should be over-excavated to allow placement of a minimum of 6 inches of granular bedding below the pipe. In organic soils, this bedding layer should be increased to at least 12 inches. If the soils are soft and susceptible to disturbance, or if organic soils are present, we recommend placing a geotextile separator fabric between the subgrade and the pipe bedding to reduce mixing of the subgrade and the bedding. We also recommend that the contractors remove any cobbles/boulders in the utility line trenches prior to utility line installation. This will reduce the potential for the development of point loads on the pipe that would not be accounted for in the pipe design. The organic soils have less support than the till or alluvial soils. However, the parking lot has been in place for a number of years and the organic soils have been loaded to their present condition. In areas where wet or organic soils are present at invert elevation, granular bedding Dr a f t t at leasat iately below iately below ade Reaction (k-vale Reaction (k- n 5 inches of aggregate bahes of aggregate b ign. oisture and vapor nd vapor protection oprotection o entitled “Floor Slab Moisturd “Floor Slab Moistu quire the vapor retarder to be e vapor retarder to b und utility consund ut truction wucti y-y-deposited sandydeposited sand he prhe project. Woject. pen trepen tr 54 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 9 of 15 should be used for proper pipe support as discussed above. Please refer to the attached standard sheet entitled “Utility Excavation Backfilling” and “Bedding/Foundation Support of Buried Pipe” for additional details regarding utility bedding and utility backfilling. We are not anticipating that the groundwater table would be encountered for excavations above a depth of 4 to 5 feet for the present groundwater conditions. Excavations below this depth may require dewatering to maintain a dry excavation. A well point system would likely be required in the fast draining sand soils; sump pits and pumps would be required for the more cohesive till soils. Please contact us for additional recommendations if deep utility excavations are anticipated. The design of the dewatering system is the responsibility of the project contractor and should be designed such that the drawdown does not influence neighboring buildings, streets, or utilities. 6.5.1 Trench Backfill Excavated organic soils should not be used as backfill. The excavated non-organic sand soils can be used as backfill for new storm sewer trenches. Review of our borings indicates that the trench backfill will primarily consist of sands, silty sands, sand with silt, and clayey sand. Utility trench backfill should be placed per the requirements of MnDOT Specification 2105.3F1 (Specified Density Method). The backfill soils should be placed in a maximum lift thickness of 1 foot or less for the granular soils and 8 inches or less for any cohesive soils. This specification requires all backfill soils placed within an excavation trench be compacted to a minimum of 100% of the standard maximum dry unit weight defined in ASTM: D698 (Standard Proctor test). Consideration can be given to modifying the project specifications to allow for a reduced minimum compaction level of 95% of the standard maximum dry unit weight to be used below the critical subgrade zone (upper 3 feet). Backfill soils placed in the upper 3 feet of the subgrade should be compacted at a water content between 65% to 102% of the standard optimum water content. The moisture content below the upper 3-foot zone shall be from 65% to 115% of the standard optimum water content. Clayey soils are often difficult to compact, as they may be naturally wet or may become wet due to groundwater or surface/rainwater during construction. Soils will need to be placed within a certain range of water (moisture) contents to attain desired compaction levels. Moisture conditioning to within this range can be time consuming, labor intensive, and requires favorable weather. Failure to compact the trench backfill to the recommended compaction levels could Dr a f t be re dations if dations if s the responsibilthe respons wn does not influencedoes not influe be used as bad as backfill. The excckfill. The e torm sewer trenches. wer trenches ReviewRevie nsist of sands, ist of sands,silty sands, sasands, sa ould be placould b ed per the requird per the req hod). The bahod). ckfill soils shol soils sho ar soar soils and 8 inchesils and 8 inch ed within an exced within an ex unit weiunit we modmod 55 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 10 of 15 result in excessive settlement over the trench. This is generally of more concern in pavement areas than in ‘green’ space. In settlement sensitive areas, such as below pavements where the utilities have been excavated into and through organic soils we recommend using lightweight fill to replace the excavated organic clay and peat soils where the swamp deposited soils are present below the pipe invert elevation. This is to avoid increasing the embankment load. Lightweight fill could consist of geofoam, cellular concrete, wood chips, or Expanded Shale, Clay, and Slate (ESCS) Lightweight (LW) Aggregate. We recommend using lightweight fill to replace the swamp deposited soils on a 1:1 basis above the utility pipes. The lightweight fill should be capped with at least 3 feet of mineral soils in ‘green’ areas. We recommend these areas be designed as forcemains with flexible pipe, such as HDPE, used to reduce the potential of differential pipe settlement affecting overall drain pipe grade and performance. This type of pipe is more tolerant to settlement and resistance to breakage than PVC. 6.6 Exterior Building Backfilling All backfill placed around the foundations should be compacted to at least 95% of their respective Standard Proctor maximum dry densities. Fill soils should be placed and compacted at water contents within ±3% of the respective optimum water contents, based on the respective Standard Proctor tests. Some of the clayey on-site soils are frost-susceptible and may cause some freeze-thaw movements of exterior slabs, sidewalks, and stoops above them. If the fill placement is not uniform below and around the surrounding pavements, there is a risk that damage to the pavement approaches, curbs, and other exterior site features may occur. Constructing a layer of NFS (non-frost susceptible) sand beneath exterior entrances, sidewalks, and stoops will reduce heaving and associated trip hazards and other problems. Sand with less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve (by weight) and less than 50% passing the No. 40 sieve (by weight) would be considered NFS sand. There should be tapered transition zones between the frost susceptible and non-frost susceptible soils, and subsurface drainage will be required at the base of the NFS sand section. Over the life of the slabs and pavements, cracks will develop, and joints will open up, which will expose the subgrade and allow water to enter from the surface and either saturate or perch atop the subgrade soils. This water intrusion increases the potential for frost heave or moisture related distress near the crack or joint. We recommend implementing a detailed maintenance Dr a f t ould e areas be e areas be ential of differentntial of differ type of pipe is more tolof pipe is more tions should be compacted toould be compacted densities. Fill soils should bes. Fill soils should b respective optispective op mum water m water on-site soils are froson-site soils are fro t-susus abs, sidewalks, and abs, sidewalks, a the surroundinthe surroundi and other and other 56 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 11 of 15 program to seal and/or fill any cracks and joints. The maintenance program should give special attention to areas where dissimilar materials abut one another, where construction joints occur, and where shrinkage cracks develop. For further details, we refer you to the attached sheet entitled “Freezing Weather Effects on Building Construction.” 6.7 Pavements 6.7.1 Subgrade Preparation We understand that complete excavation of the buried organic soils is not planned for preparation of the pavement subgrades. With the buried organic soils left in place it can be anticipated that the parking lot and driveways may settle at varying amounts throughout the site as the organic soils are of various thicknesses, depths and strengths. Leaving the organic soils in place will increase maintenance costs over the life of the pavements and could pose the risk of pedestrian trip hazards and vehicular damage unless pavement releveling and maintenance is performed on a regular basis. Portions of the existing pavement are supported over buried organic soils. To prepare the pavement subgrades, we recommend removing the existing pavement, topsoil, soils containing organics, buried swamp deposits, and any soft or unstable soils within 3 feet of finished subgrade. If clayey or silty soils are encountered such as at Boring Nos. B-2, B-4, and B-5, the pavement excavation should also extend deep enough to allow for the placement of a minimum 12-inch thick sand subbase layer below the Class 5 base aggregate. In addition to providing pavement support, the 12-inch thick sand subbase layer will also assist in reducing periods of saturation, and reduces the detrimental effects of differential frost heaving and subsequent thawing. Without constructing the sand subbase, the variety of subgrade soils expected at the proposed subgrade elevations will heave and thaw at different rates and magnitudes, which may result in localized weak pavement areas and reduced service life. We recommend using Select Granular Material Modified 8% (MnDOT Spec. 3149.2.B, Table 3149.2- 1) as sand subbase material. The sand subbase should have no more than 8% (by weight) passing the #200 sieve. In some areas organic soils will be left in place; we recommend the placement of a woven geofabric over any organic soils left in place prior to the placement of new fill. As discussed above differential settlement will occur for partial removal of organic soils. Dr a f t uried orgauried orga buried organic sburied organ ay settle at vaettle at varying amorying a s, depths and strengths. Les and strengths. Le ver the life of the pavementslife of the pavements r damage unless pavement rge unless pavemen ortions of the existing pavemhe existing pavem ubgrades, we recommubgrades, we reco end rend re , buried swamp deposits, an buried swamp deposits ayey or sayeyilty soils are encous are enco vation vation should also exteso e subbase layer b subbase layer supsup 57 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 12 of 15 The exposed subgrade soils are expected to be sand, silty sand, clayey sand and possibly organic silty sand, both naturally deposited and fill. Prior to placing new fill, we recommend surface compacting the prepared subgrade, if sand or silty sand, with a large, self-propelled vibratory roller. Compaction of the organic silty sand or silty soils should not be performed as this will disturb them. Care will need to be taken not to disturb the subgrade soils prior to placement of fill. 6.7.2 Subsurface Drainage If clayey or silty subgrade soils are present, subsurface drainage must be provided for the recommended sand subbase to avoid water build up and the formation of ice lenses. Draintiles should be installed below the sand subbase to remove infiltrating water. This can be accomplished by placing short segments of perforated drainage lines which are connected to catch basins at lower elevations (referred to as “finger drains”). Where the pavement is relatively level, and finger drains are not frequent, we recommend placing a series of longer parallel drainage lines through the level area to better remove infiltrating water. The final slope/shape of the clayey soils below the sand subbase layer should promote water movement to the draintile lines. 6.7.3 Section Thicknesses We are presenting pavement thickness recommendations based on two potential traffic situations: light duty and heavy duty. The light duty design refers to parking areas which are intended only for automobiles and passenger trucks/vans. The heavy duty design is intended for drive lane pavements which will experience heavier truck traffic (9-ton to 10-ton design load), such as delivery trucks, garbage trucks, and snow plows. These recommendations can be revised, if needed, when traffic count frequency and specific use requirements are known. Dr a f t the fo emove infiltemove inf ated drainage ed drainage lin “finger drains”). r drains”). and finger drains are not frnger drains are rainage lines through the lelines through the ape of the clhe clayey soils below ayey soils belo draintile lines. ines. ses es avement thickness revement thickness recommcom nd heavy duty. The light nd heavy duty. The dd biles and passenger biles and passeng ch will experiench will experie e truckse truck ntnt 58 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 13 of 15 Table 6.7.3 – Pavement Thickness Recommendations Section Thickness (inches) and Design Mix Pavement Course Light Duty (Automobile Traffic Only) Heavy Duty Areas Bituminous Wear 2 - (Mix: SPWEA330F*) 2 - (Mix: SPWEA440F*) Bituminous Base 2 - (Mix: SPWEB340F*) 2½ - (Mix: SPNWB330F*) Aggregate Base (MnDOT 3138 – 100% Crushed 6 8 Sand Subbase** 12 12 *Recommended Asphalt Binder: PG 58V-34 **If clayey or silty subgrade soils are present. The above recommended section thicknesses should provide a minimum thickness of 3½ inches for light duty and 4 inches for the heavy duty, accounting for industry placement methods and allowed tolerances of ¼ inch per lift. In our opinion, for long term performance, the pavement structure should not have less than the given minimum thicknesses. Imported aggregate base should meet the gradation and quality requirements for Class 5, 5Q, or 6 per MnDOT Spec. 3138. The base can be crushed limestone or recycled material. Aggregate base placement and compaction should be performed according to MnDOT Spec. 2211. All aggregate base material should be tested for compaction using the Penetration Index Method per MnDOT Spec. 2211.3.D.2.c. After the aggregate base course has been placed, compacted, and tested, it is the Contractor’s responsibility to maintain the base in a suitable condition for paving. If the subgrade becomes saturated after testing, it may be rendered unsuitable for paving due to softness and instability. This would require remedial action before the pavement can be placed. The bituminous materials should meet appropriate MnDOT 2360 specifications. The bituminous pavement materials should be compacted to the specified density. The use of Recycled Asphalt Products (RAP) is a cost saving measure that is often suggested, however there will be a higher Dr a f t 0F*) F*) SPtft6 88ftaft 12 12 afraraafaaa: PG 58V-34 **If clayV-34 **If cla ey or sy or s ection thicknesses should prction thicknesses should proo es for the heavy duty, s for the heavy duty, accounac ¼ inch per lift. In our¼ inch per lift. In ou opiniopinior e less than the given me less than the give uld muld meet theet th The The 59 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 14 of 15 probability of pavement thermal cracking when RAP is used. We recommend limiting RAP within the upper wear course to a maximum of 10% and in lower courses to a maximum of 20% to reduce thermal cracking. Minimizing the number of mixes and binder oils (PG grades) used on a project is generally more economical. The use of an F-binder oil (PG 58V-34) in the wear layers will reduce rutting caused by turning movements, slow speeds, and starting/stopping traffic. It will also result in less thermal cracking of the pavement and subsequently less maintenance and better long-term pavement performance than mixes that have B-binder oil (PG 58S-28). 6.7.4 Bituminous Pavement Comments The bituminous pavement sections given above would have an estimated life of 20 years. However, the Owner should not expect that the pavements would last 20 years without maintenance. Even if placed and compacted properly on stable subgrade conditions, bituminous pavements will likely experience cracking in 1 to 3 years, primarily due to temperature-related expansion and shrinkage. Each of the designs given above assumes that a regularly scheduled maintenance program consisting of patching cracks and repairing of locally distressed areas would be implemented. Seal coating of the pavement surface after 3 to 5 years often helps prolong pavement life. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Potential Difficulties 7.1.1 Runoff Water in Excavation Water can be expected to collect in the excavation bottom during times of inclement weather or snow melt. To allow observation of the excavation bottom, to reduce the potential for soil disturbance, and to facilitate filling operations, we recommend water be removed from within the excavation during construction. Based on the soils encountered, we anticipate the groundwater can be handled with conventional sump pumping in the more cohesive soils. Excavations deeper than about 4 to 5 in that naturally deposited sands that are water bearing may require well points. 7.1.2 Disturbance of Soils The on-site soils can be disturbed under construction traffic, especially if the soils are wet. If soils become disturbed, they should be subcut to the underlying undisturbed soils. The subcut soils can then be dried and recompacted back into place, or they should be removed and replaced with drier imported fill. Dr a f t would have an eould have a the pavements would pavements would properly on stable on stable subgrade bgrade in 1 to 3 3 years, primarily duyears, prima designs gigiven above assumeven above assum f patching cracks and repairng cracks and repa oating of the pavement surfaf the pavement surfa ON CONSIDERATIONS ON CONSIDERATION ties ties avation avation nthnth 60 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 15 of 15 7.1.3 Cobbles and Boulders The soils at this site can include cobbles and boulders. This may make excavating procedures somewhat more difficult than normal if they are encountered. 7.2 Excavation Backsloping If excavation faces are not retained, the excavations should maintain maximum allowable slopes in accordance with OSHA Regulations (Standards 29 CFR), Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations” (can be found on www.osha.gov). Even with the required OSHA sloping, water seepage or surface runoff can potentially induce sideslope erosion or sloughing which could require slope maintenance. 7.3 Observation and Testing The recommendations in this report are based on the subsurface conditions found at our test boring locations. Since the soil conditions can be expected to vary away from the soil boring locations, we recommend on-site observation by a geotechnical engineer/technician during construction to evaluate these potential changes. Soil density testing should also be performed on new fill placed in order to document that project specifications for compaction have been satisfied. 8.0 ASTM STANDARDS When we refer to an ASTM Standard in this report, we mean that our services were performed in general accordance with that standard. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. 9.0 LIMITATIONS Within the limitations of scope, budget, and schedule, we have endeavored to provide our services according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, express or implied, is intended. Important information regarding risk management and proper use of this report is given in Appendix B entitled “Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use.” slo d on the subsurface condie subsurface condi can be expected to vary awexpected to vary aw ervation byby a geotechnical e a geotechnica ial changes. es.Soil density testoil density test ument that project specificatthat project specifica RDS RDS STM Standard in this repoSTM Standard in this repo with thatwith th standard. Coard. is is neither inferneither infe 61 Item 8. 01REP013 (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. FLOOR SLAB MOISTURE/VAPOR PROTECTION Floor slab design relative to moisture/vapor protection should consider the type and location of two elements, a granular layer and a vapor membrane (vapor retarder, water resistant barrier or vapor barrier). In the following sections, the pros and cons of the possible options regarding these elements will be presented, such that you and your specifier can make an engineering decision based on the benefits and costs of the choices. GRANULAR LAYER In American Concrete Institute (ACI) 302.1R-04, a “base material” is recommended over the vapor membrane, rather than the conventional clean “sand cushion” material. The base layer should be a minimum of 4 inches (100 mm) thick, trimmable, compactable, granular fill (not sand), a so-called crusher-run material. Usually graded from 1½ inches to 2 inches (38 to 50 mm) down to rock dust is suitable. Following compaction, the surface can be choked off with a fine-grade material. We refer you to ACI 302.1R-04 for additional details regarding the requirements for the base material. In cases where potential static water levels or significant perched water sources appear near or above the floor slab, an under floor drainage system may be needed wherein a draintile system is placed within a thicker clean sand or gravel layer. Such a system should be properly engineered depending on subgrade soil types and rate/head of water inflow. VAPOR MEMBRANE The need for a vapor membrane depends on whether the floor slab will have a vapor sensitive covering, will have vapor sensitive items stored on the slab, or if the space above the slab will be a humidity controlled area. If the project does not have this vapor sensitivity or moisture control need, placement of a vapor membrane may not be necessary. Your decision will then relate to whether to use the ACI base material or a conventional sand cushion layer. However, if any of the above sensitivity issues apply, placement of a vapor membrane is recommended. Some floor covering systems (adhesives and flooring materials) require installation of a vapor membrane to limit the slab moisture content as a condition of their warranty. VAPOR MEMBRANE/GRANULAR LAYER PLACEMENT A number of issues should be considered when deciding whether to place the vapor membrane above or below the granular layer. The benefits of placing the slab on a granular layer, with the vapor membrane placed below the granular layer, include reduction of the following: •Slab curling during the curing and drying process. •Time of bleeding, which allows for quicker finishing. •Vapor membrane puncturing. •Surface blistering or delamination caused by an extended bleeding period. •Cracking caused by plastic or drying shrinkage. The benefits of placing the vapor membrane over the granular layer include the following: •A lower moisture emission rate is achieved faster. •Eliminates a potential water reservoir within the granular layer above the membrane. •Provides a “slip surface”, thereby reducing slab restraint and the associated random cracking. If a membrane is to be used in conjunction with a granular layer, the approach recommended depends on slab usage and the construction schedule. The vapor membrane should be placed above the granular layer when: •Vapor sensitive floor covering systems are used or vapor sensitive items will be directly placed on the slab. •The area will be humidity controlled, but the slab will be placed before the building is enclosed and sealed from rain. •Required by a floor covering manufacturer’s system warranty. The vapor membrane should be placed below the granular layer when: • Used in humidity controlled areas (without vapor sensitive coverings/stored items), with the roof membrane in place, and the building enclosed to the point where precipitation will not intrude into the slab area. Consideration should be given to slight sloping of the membrane to edges where draintile or other disposal methods can alleviate potential water sources, such as pipe or roof leaks, foundation wall damp proofing failure, fire sprinkler system activation, etc. There may be cases where membrane placement may have a detrimental effect on the subgrade support system (e.g., expansive soils). In these cases, your decision will need to weigh the cost of subgrade options and the performance risks. Dr a f t tab will have a vab will have a e the slab will be a hthe slab will b trol need, placement of a vneed, placement o use the ACI base material or a cACI base material or a c pply, placement of a vapor membranement of a vapor membran erials) require installation of a vapor uire installation of a vapor YER PLACEMENT EMENT rad when deciding whether to place theeciding whether to place th ng the slab on a granular layer, withb on a granular layer, wi f the following: ing: curing and drying process. curing and drying proce hich allows for quicker finishing. hich allows for quicker finishin puncturing. punctu g or delamination caused by an extg or delamination caused by an ext plastic or drying shrinkage. plastic or drying shrink r membrane over the r membrane over th rate is achievrate is achiev servoir servoir 62 Item 8. 01REP015 (07/18) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. FREEZING WEATHER EFFECTS ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Because water expands upon freezing and soils contain water, soils which are allowed to freeze will heave and lose density. Upon thawing, these soils will not regain their original strength and density. The extent of heave and density/strength loss depends on the soil type and moisture condition. Heave is greater in soils with higher percentages of fines (silts/clays). High silt content soils are most susceptible, due to their high capillary rise potential which can create ice lenses. Fine grained soils generally heave about 1/4" to 3/8" for each foot of frost penetration. This can translate to 1" to 2" of total frost heave. This total amount can be significantly greater if ice lensing occurs. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Clayey and silty soils can be used as perimeter backfill, although the effect of their poor drainage and frost properties should be considered. Basement areas will have special drainage and lateral load requirements which are not discussed here. Frost heave may be critical in doorway areas. Stoops or sidewalks adjacent to doorways could be designed as structural slabs supported on frost footings with void spaces below. With this design, movements may then occur between the structural slab and the adjacent on-grade slabs. Non-frost susceptible sands (with less than 40% by weight passing a #40 sieve and no more than 5% by weight passing a #200 sieve) can be used below such areas. Depending on the function of surrounding areas, the sand layer may need a thickness transition away from the area where movement is critical. With sand placement over slower draining soils, subsurface drainage would be needed for the sand layer. High density extruded polystyrene insulation could be used within the sand to reduce frost penetration, thereby reducing the sand thickness needed. We caution that insulation placed near the surface can increase the potential for ice glazing of the surface. The possible effects of adfreezing should be considered if clayey or silty soils are used as backfill. Adfreezing occurs when backfill adheres to rough surfaced foundation walls and lifts the wall as it freezes and heaves. This occurrence is most common with masonry block walls, unheated or poorly heated building situations and clay backfill. The potential is also increased where backfill soils are poorly compacted and become saturated. The risk of adfreezing can be decreased by placing a low friction separating layer between the wall and backfill. Adfreezing can occur on exterior piers (such as deck, fence, or other similar pier footings), even if a smooth surface is provided. This is more likely in poor drainage situations where soils become saturated. Additional footing embedment and/or widened footings below the frost zones (which include tensile reinforcement) can be used to resist uplift forces. Specific designs would require individual analysis. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Foundations, slabs and other improvements which may be affected by frost movements should be insulated from frost penetration during freezing weather. If filling takes place during freezing weather, all frozen soils, snow and ice should be stripped from areas to be filled prior to new fill placement. The new fill should not be allowed to freeze during transit, placement or compaction. This should be considered in the project scheduling, budgeting and quantity estimating. It is usually beneficial to perform cold weather earthwork operations in small areas where grade can be attained quickly rather than working larger areas where a greater amount of frost stripping may be needed. If slab subgrade areas freeze, we recommend the subgrade be thawed prior to floor slab placement. The frost action may also require reworking and recompaction of the thawed subgrade. Dr a f t space de slabs. Nslabs. N y weight passingy weight passin the sand layer mae sand layer may nee cement over slower drainingnt over slower drai ded polystyrene insulation could btyrene insulation could b thickness needed. We caution that ineded. We caution that i of the surface. urface. be considered if ed i clayey or silty soilsayey or silty soil urfaced foundation foundation walls and lifts thwalls and lifts t asonry block walls, unhock walls, unheated or pooeated or p ased where backfill soe backf ils are poorly are poorly by placing a low fricby placing a low friction separatingtion separating exterior piers (such as deck, fenceexterior piers (such as deck, fen s is more likely in poor drainages is more likely in poor drainage widened footings below the widened footings below ecific designs would reecific designs would IONS IONS Dments ments 63 Item 8. 01REP019 (07/16) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. DEFINITIONS RELATING TO PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION Top of subgrade: Grade which contacts the bottom of the aggregate base layer. Sand subbase: Uniform thickness sand layer placed as the top of subgrade which is intended to improve the frost and drainage characteristics of the pavement system by increasing drainage of excess water in the aggregate base and subbase, by reducing and “bridging” frost heaving, and by reducing spring thaw weakening effects. Critical subgrade zone: The subgrade portion beneath and within three vertical feet of the top of subgrade. A sand subbase, if placed, would be considered the upper portion of the critical subgrade zone. Suitable Grading Material:Mineral soil materials, typically from the project site, excluding the following: 1) soils which have an organic content exceeding 3%, 2) cohesive soils having a Liquid Limit exceeding 50%, 3) soils which include debris, cobbles, and/or boulders, and 4) soils which are considered acceptable from an environmental standpoint. The soil must also be capable of attaining the specified compaction level at its current water content or at a water content that can be reasonably scarified, blended, and moisture conditioned to a uniform water content in order to uniformly meet compaction requirements. Granular Material: Soils meeting MnDOT Specification 3149.2B.1. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the 1" sieve, contain less than 20% by weight passing the #200 sieve. Select Granular Material: Soils meeting MnDOT Specification 3149.2B.2. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the 1" sieve, contain less than 12% by weight passing the #200 sieve. Select Granular Material (Super Sand): Soils meeting MnDOT Specification 3149.2B.3. This material is cleaner and coarser than Select Granular Material (see specification for specific requirements). Compaction Subcut: Construction of a uniform thickness subcut below a designated grade to provide uniformity and compaction within the subcut zone. Replacement fill can be the materials subcut, although the reused soils should be blended to a uniform soil condition, moisture conditioned as needed to meet MnDOT Specification 2105.F; and re-compacted per the Specified Density Method defined in MnDOT Specification 2105.3F.1. Test Roll: A means of evaluating the near-surface stability of subgrade soils (usually non-granular). Suitability is determined by the depth of rutting or deflection caused by passage of heavy rubber-tired construction equipment, such as a loaded dump truck, over the test area. Yielding of less than 1" is normally considered acceptable, although engineering judgment may be applied depending on the equipment used, soil conditions present, and/or depth below final grade. Unstable Soils: Subgrade soils which do not pass a test roll. Unstable soils typically have water content exceeding the standard optimum water content defined in ASTM:D698 (Standard Proctor test). Organic Soils: Soils which have sufficient organic content such that the soils engineering properties are negatively affected (typically more than 3% organic content). These soils are usually black to dark brown in color. Dr a f t 2) c boulders, uld uust also be capst also be ca water content that cater content th er content in order to unintent in order to Specification 3149.2B.1. ation 3149.2B.1. This refeTh less than 20% by weight passing t20% by weight passing eeting MnDOT Specification 3149nDOT Specification 3149 " sieve, contain contain less than 12% by han 12% by Super Sand):Super Sand): Soils meeting MnD Soils me n Select Granular Material (see spen Select Granular Material (se Construction of a uniform thicConstruction of a unifor within the subcut zone.within the subcut zo ended to a uniformended to a unifor nd re-compand re-comp 64 Item 8. 01REP016 (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND DESIGN GENERAL Bituminous pavements are considered layered “flexible” systems. Dynamic wheel loads transmit high local stresses through the bituminous/base onto the subgrade. Because of this, the upper portion of the subgrade requires high strength/stability to reduce deflection and fatigue of the bituminous/base system. The wheel load intensity dissipates through the subgrade such that the high level of soil stability is usually not needed below about 2 feet to 4 feet (depending on the anticipated traffic and underlying soil conditions). This is the primary reason for specifying a higher level of compaction within the upper subgrade zone versus the lower portion. Moderate compaction is usually desired below the upper critical zone, primarily to avoid settlements/sags of the roadway. However, if the soils present below the upper 3 feet subgrade zone are unstable, attempts to properly compact the upper 3 feet zone to the 100% level may be difficult or not possible. Therefore, control of moisture just below the 3 feet level may be needed to provide a non-yielding base upon which to compact the upper subgrade soils. Long-term pavement performance is dependent on the soil subgrade drainage and frost characteristics. Poor to moderate draining soils tend to be susceptible to frost heave and subsequent weakening upon thaw. This condition can result in irregular frost movements and “pop-outs,” as well as an accelerated softening of the subgrade. Frost problems become more pronounced when the subgrade is layered with soils of varying permeability. In this situation, the free-draining soils provide a pathway and reservoir for water infiltration which exaggerates the movements. The placement of a well-drained sand subbase layer as the top of subgrade can minimize trapped water, smooth frost movements and significantly reduce subgrade softening. In wet, layered and/or poor drainage situations, the long-term performance gain should be significant. If a sand subbase is placed, we recommend it be a “Select Granular Borrow” which meets Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2B2. PREPARATION Subgrade preparation should include stripping surficial vegetation and organic soils; where the exposed soils are within the upper “critical” subgrade zone (generally 2 feet deep for “auto only” areas and 3 feet deep for “heavy duty” areas), they should be evaluated for stability. Excavation equipment may make such areas obvious due to deflection and rutting patterns. Final evaluation of soils within the critical subgrade zone should be done by test rolling with heavy rubber-tired construction equipment, such as a loaded dump truck. Soils which rut or deflect 1" or more under the test roll should be corrected by either subcutting or replacement; or by scarification, drying, and recompaction. Reworked soils and new fill should be compacted per the “Specified Density Method” outlined in Mn/DOT Specification 2105.3F1 (a minimum of 100% of Standard Proctor density in the upper 3 feet subgrade zone, and a minimum of 95% below this). Subgrade preparation scheduling can be an important consideration. Fall and Spring seasons usually have unfavorable weather for soil drying. Stabilizing non-sand subgrades during these seasons may be difficult, and attempts often result in compromising the pavement quality. Where construction scheduling requires subgrade preparation during these times, the use of a sand subbase becomes even more beneficial for constructability reasons. SUBGRADE DRAINAGE If a sand subbase layer is used, it should be provided with a means of subsurface drainage to prevent water build-up. This can be in the form of draintile lines which dispose into storm sewer systems, or outlets into ditches. Where sand subbase layers include sufficient sloping and water can migrate to lower areas, draintile lines can be limited to finger drains at the catch basins. Even if a sand layer is not placed, strategically placed draintile lines can aid in improving pavement performance. This would be most important in areas where adjacent non-paved areas slope towards the pavement. Perimeter edge drains can aid in intercepting water which may infiltrate below the pavement. Dr a f t accele ed with soied with soi voir for water invoir for water er as the top of subgradas the top of sub rade softening. In wet, laysoftening. In wet, nificant. If a sand f a sand subbase is placease is place cification 3149.2B2. 49.2B2. afng surficial vegetation and organic svegetation and organic s (generally 2 feet y 2 feet deep for “auto onleep for “auto o for stability. Excavity. Exca ation equipmenttion equipmen l evaluation of soils withon of soils within the criticin the crit nstruction equipment, such as a loadestruction equipment, such as a loade d be correctbe corrected by either subcutting oed by either s ils and new fill should be coils and new fill should be compactemp 105.3F1 (a minimum of 100% of S105.3F1 (a minimum of 100% of S 5% below this). 5% bel ng can be an impong can be an imp ng. Stabilizing nng. Stabilizing ng the pavng the pa f a saf a sa 65 Item 8. 01REP022 (07/14) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. DEFINITIONS RELATING TO UTILITY CONSTRUCTION Boulders- Particles of rock that cannot be made to pass a 12-inch square opening when rotated in any orientation (modified from ASTM:D2487). Cobbles- Particles of rock that will pass a 12-inch square opening and be retained on a 3-inch U.S. standard sieve per ASTM:D2487. Coarse Filter Aggregate- Soils which uniformly meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3149.2H Fine Filter Aggregate- Soils which uniformly meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3149.2J. Granular Bedding-Soils which uniformly meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3149.2F. Select Granular Material-Sandy soils which uniformly meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3149.2B2. Sands (SP) and sands with silt (SP-SM) meet this criterion, with this classification based on the component passing the 1-inch sieve. Suitable Grading Material- Soil materials from the project site, excluding the following: 1) cohesive soils having a Liquid Limit exceeding 50%, 2) soils which have an organic content exceeding 2%, and 3) soils which include debris, cobbles, and/or boulders. The soil must also be capable of attaining the specified compaction level at its current water content or at a water content that can be reasonably scarified, blended, and moisture conditioned to a proper and uniform water content in order to uniformly meet compaction requirements. Bedding- Granular soil placed in the bottom of the trench on top of the foundation soil for the purpose of providing uniform support for the pipe (shaped to conform to the bottom of the pipe to minimize point or imbalanced loads on the pipe). For this project, assume a baseline minimum bedding thickness of 4 inches. Pipe Zone-Area around the pipe defined by the bottom of the bedding layer, the trench walls, and 6-inches above the top of pipe, which includes the bedding, haunch area, embedment material, and 6 inches of cover material. Foundation soil/foundation zone- Soils beneath the pipe zone which must be stable and free of open void space (caused by debris, cobble, and/or boulders) in order to allow bedding, pipe, and backfill to be accurately placed without ground movements. Where in-place soils in the “foundation zone” are unstable (or has open voids), it is necessary to excavate the unstable soils (defined below) and replace them with granular or rock foundation materials. The depth of the “foundation zone” depends on the degree and depth of instability, however, can be assumed to be 12 inches thick for baseline purposes. Unstable soils- Soils present in the foundation zone which can change shape (shift, deflect, compress, etc.) as a result of actual or anticipated loading, whether induced naturally or by the construction activity. Unstable soils include: x Organic soils. x Very soft to soft clays and clayey silts. x Very loose to loose silts to fine silty sands. x Waterbearing/wet soils which are not properly dewatered. x Soils which become disturbed as a result of the construction activity (recognize that avoiding disturbance through proper construction techniques and dewatering is the responsibility of the contractor). Geotextile separation fabric-A geotextile intended for use in separating materials which do not have a proper gradation transition to prevent erosion of finer materials into the void space of open-graded materials (such as clear rock). The geotextile should meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3733, Type V. Dr a f t ssi , excluding the folloexcluding the f nic content exceeding 2%content exceeding apable of attaining the specifiof attaining the specifi reasonably scarified, blended, and mscarified, blended, and m ly meet compaction requirements. mpaction requirements. f the trench on top of the foundation sh on top of the foundation form to the bottom of the pipe to miniottom of the pipe to min ine minimum bedding thickness of 4 imum bedding thickness of 4 efined by the bottom of the bedding he bottom of the bedding he bedding, haunch area, embedment e bedding, haunch area, embedment n zone-n zone Soils beneath the pipe zoneneath the pipe zo e, and/or boulders) in order to alloe, and/or boulders) in order to allo s. Where in-s. Wher place soils in the ls in nstable soils (defined benstable soils (defined undation zone” depundation zone” de aseline purposeaseline purpos ndanda 66 Item 8. 01REP017 (07/14)AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BEDDING/FOUNDATION SUPPORT OF BURIED PIPE GENERAL This page addresses soil bedding and foundation support of rigid pipe, such as reinforced concrete, and flexible pipe, such as steel and plastic. This does not address selection of pipe based on loads and allowable deflections, but rather addresses the geotechnical/soil aspects of uniform pipe support. Bedding/foundation support needs relate to local conditions directly beneath and to the sides of the pipe zone, which may be influenced by soft in-situ ground conditions or by soil disturbance due to soil sensitivity or ground water. Bedding relates to granular materials placed directly beneath the bottom of the pipe (usually 4" to 6" thick), which is intended to provide increased support uniformity. We refer to foundation soils as thicker layers of sands and/or gravels (beneath the bedding zone) intended to provide increased foundation strength support, usually needed due to soft, unstable and/or waterbearing conditions. GRANULAR BEDDING With circular pipes, high local loads (approaching point loads) develop if pipes are placed on hard surfaces. Load distribution is improved by placing granular bedding materials beneath the pipe, which are either shaped to match the pipe bottom or are placed without compaction to allow “settling in.” The bedding should be placed in such a manner that the pipe will be at the proper elevation and slope when the pipe is laid on the bedding. Common bedding material is defined in MnDOT Specification 3149.2F, Granular Bedding. Published documents recommend rigid pipes having a diameter of 12" to 54" be placed on a bedding thickness of 4", which increases to 6" of bedding for pipe diameters ranging from 54" to 72". Beyond a 72" diameter, the bedding thickness can be equal to the pipe outside diameter divided by 12. Typically, the need for bedding under small diameter pipes (less than 12") depends on the pipe designer’s specific needs, although in obvious point loads situations (bedrock, cobbles, significant coarse gravel content), bedding is recommended. Note that bedding should also account for larger diameter bells at joints. FOUNDATION FILL Positive uniform strength is usually compromised in soft or unstable trench bottom conditions. In this case, deeper subcuts and foundation fill placement is needed beneath the pipe. In moderate instability conditions, improvement can likely be accomplished with a thicker bedding layer. However, in more significant instability situations, particularly where ground water is present, coarser materials may be needed to provide a stronger foundation. Thicker gravel layers can also be a favorable media from which to dewater. The following materials would be appropriate for stability improvement, with the coarser materials being appropriate for higher instability/ground water cases. x Fine Filter Aggregate –MnDOT Specification 3149.2J x Coarse Filter Aggregate –MnDOT Specification 3149.2H When using a coarser material which includes significant void space, we highly recommend enveloping the entire gravel layer within a geotextile separation fabric. The gravel material includes open void space, and the fabric acts as a separator which minimizes the intrusion of fines into the open void space. If additional granular bedding sand is used above foundation gravel, the fabric would also prevent downward infiltration of bedding sand into the rock void space. Although it is preferred to not highly compact thin granular bedding zones directly beneath the pipe center, it is desirable to compact the foundation materials to prevent more significant pipe settlement. We recommend foundation fill be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the Standard Proctor density (ASTM: D698). It is not possible to test coarse rock fill, although this material should still be well compacted/ tamped. Often, pipes entering structures such as catch basins, lift stations, etc., enter the structure at a higher elevation than the structure bottom, and are therefore placed on the structure backfill. Fill beneath these pipes should be considered foundation fill. Depending on the flexibility of the connection design, it may be necessary to increase the minimum compaction level to reduce differential settlements, particularly with thicker fills. SIDE FILL SUPPORT If the pipe designer requires support from the side fill, granular bedding should also be placed along the sides of the pipe. In poor soil conditions, the sand fill may need to be placed laterally up to two pipe diameters on both sides of the pipe. With rigid pipe, compacted sand placement up to the spring line (within the haunch area) is usually sufficient. With flexible pipe, side fill should be placed and compacted at least to the top of the pipe. For positive support, it is very important to properly compact the sands within the haunch area. he bedd der small diader small dia oads situations (beoads situations ( hould also account for lauld also account ftsoft or unstable trench bottom conditble trench bottom condi eneath the pipe. In moderate instabile pipe. In moderate edding layer. However, in more siyer. However, in more coarser materials may be needeaterials may be neededd t rable media from which to dewaterdia from which to dewat with the coarser materials being apcoarser materials being a MnDOT MnDOT SpecificationSpecification 3149.2JJ ate ate ––MnDOT Specification 3149.2MnDOT Specification 3 H aterialterial which includes significant voiwhich includes significant vo extile extile separation s fabric. The gravc. Th es the intrusion of fines intoes the intrusion of fines the fabric would also the fabric would als ompaomp 67 Item 8. 01REP018 (06/16) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. UTILITY EXCAVATION BACKFILLING GENERAL Clayey and silty soils are often difficult to compact, as they may be naturally wet or dry, or may become wet due to ground water or runoff water during construction. Soils will need to be placed within a certain range of water (moisture) content to attain desired compaction levels. Moisture conditioning to within this range can be time consuming and labor intensive, and will require favorable weather. The degree of compaction and the soil type used for backfill within open cut utility excavations depends on the eventual function of the overlying land surface. Details are as follows: ROADWAYS Where trenches are located below roadways, we recommend using inorganic fill and compacting these soils per MnDOT Specification 2105.3F1 (Specified Density Method). On MnDOT funded roads, the 2016 Specification requires 100% compaction over the entire trench depth. On non-MnDOT funded roads, we feel the specification can be relaxed to the previous version of achieving 100% of the Standard Proctor density in the upper 3-foot subgrade zone, and 95% below this depth. Note that this specification also includes moisture content range requirements which are important for proper subgrade stability. Where available soils are wet or of poor quality, it may be possible to use the “Quality Compaction Method” (MnDOT Specification 2105.3F2) for soils below the upper 3-foot subgrade zone if you can tolerate some subsidence. However, a high level of stability is still important within the upper subgrade zone and recommend that the “Specified Density Method" be used in this upper subgrade area. We caution that if backfill soils in the lower trench area are significantly unstable, it may be difficult or even impossible to properly compact soils within the upper 3-foot subgrade zone. In this case, road subgrade stability can be improved by placing a geotextile reinforcement fabric directly over the unstable soils followed by properly drained granular fill placement. STRUCTURAL AREAS If fill is placed beneath or within the significant zone of influence of a structure (typically a 1:1 lateral oversize zone), the soil type and minimum compaction level will need to be evaluated on an individual basis. Because trenches result in variable fill depths over a short lateral distance, higher than normal compaction levels and/or more favorable (sandy) soil fill types may be needed. If this situation exists, it is important that special geotechnical engineering review be performed. NON-STRUCTURAL AREAS In grass/ditch areas, backfill soils should be placed in reasonable lift thicknesses and compacted to a minimum of 90% of the Standard Proctor density (ASTM: D698) and/or per the MnDOT “Quality Compaction Method.” If lower compaction levels are accepted, more noticeable subsidence at the surface can occur. Steep or high slopes require special consideration, and if this situation exists, it is important that special geotechnical engineering review be performed. SPECIAL CASES Structural retention systems are often used to reduce impacts on adjacent streets/improvements. If localized excavations/pits or annular spaces are created which need to be backfilled, it may not be possible to place and compact soils by the conventional means of backfilling. Retraction of structural systems can also leave soils loosened. Significant settlement can occur in areas where backfill cannot be compacted. If these situations are located in non-structural or non-paved areas, it may be reasonable to accept the settlements and associated follow-up maintenance in order avoid the high cost of trying to compact the soil or placing flowable lean concrete fill. However, there may be areas where fill settlement needs to be avoided, especially as the settlement will be differential from the surrounding surface, or differential from a buried structure in the case of higher piping entering the structure. Where settlement needs to be avoided, the specification should require that the contractor submit a backfill compaction plan along with the retention plan. Improper sequencing of retention system removal and backfilling of the pits could result in excessive settlement and/or lateral movement of nearby improvements. Dr a f t ncludes e possible to use the “Qossible to use t upper 3-foot subgrade zone 3-foot subgrade z portant within the upper subgrade zthin the upper subgrade z r subgrade area. We caution that if brea. We caution that if b difficult or even impossible to properr even impossible to oad subgrade stability can be imprade stability can be im e soils followed by properly drainewed by properly drained gd rahe significant zone of ant zo influence of afluence of um compaction level will nem compaction level will need to bed to b depths ovepths over a short lateral distance, hier a short lateral d types may be needed. If this sypes may be needed. If this situatioit rformed. formed AS AS Dls should be placed ils should be placed y (ASTM: D69y (ASTM: D69 noticeabnoticeab on eon 68 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Page 1 of 1 Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System Figure 1 – Boring Locations Subsurface Boring Logs Dr a f t ft A echnical Field Explorical Field Explor BB Unified Soil ClaUnified So Figure gure S 69 Item 8. Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0010684 Appendix A - Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling and sampling twelve (12) standard penetration test borings. The locations of the borings appear on Figure 1, preceding the Subsurface Boring Logs in this appendix. A.2 SAMPLING METHODS A.2.1 Split-Spoon Samples (SS) - Calibrated to N60 Values Standard penetration (split-spoon) samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM: D1586 with one primary modification. The ASTM test method consists of driving a 2-inch O.D. split-barrel sampler into the in-situ soil with a 140- pound hammer dropped from a height of 30 inches. The sampler is driven a total of 18 inches into the soil. After an initial set of 6 inches, the number of hammer blows to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the standard penetration resistance or N-value. Our method uses a modified hammer weight, which is determined by measuring the system energy using a Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and an instrumented rod. In the past, standard penetration N-value tests were performed using a rope and cathead for the lift and drop system. The energy transferred to the split-spoon sampler was typically limited to about 60% of its potential energy due to the friction inherent in this system. This converted energy then provides what is known as an N60 blow count. The most recent drill rigs incorporate an automatic hammer lift and drop system, which has higher energy efficiency and subsequently results in lower N-values than the traditional N60 values. By using the PDA energy measurement equipment, we are able to determine actual energy generated by the drop hammer. With the various hammer systems available, we have found highly variable energies ranging from 55% to over 100%. Therefore, the intent of AET’s hammer calibrations is to vary the hammer weight such that hammer energies lie within about 60% to 65% of the theoretical energy of a 140-pound weight falling 30 inches. The current ASTM procedure acknowledges the wide variation in N- values, stating that N-values of 100% or more have been observed. Although we have not yet determined the statistical measurement uncertainty of our calibrated method to date, we can state that the accuracy deviation of the N-values using this method is significantly better than the standard ASTM Method. A.2.2 Disturbed Samples (DS)/Spin-up Samples (SU) Sample types described as “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger. Because the auger disturbs the samples, possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate. A.2.3 Sampling Limitations Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of drilling tools. Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs. Determining the thickness of “topsoil” layers is usually limited, due to variations in topsoil definition, sample recovery, and other factors. Visual-manual description often relies on color for determination, and transitioning changes can account for significant variation in thickness judgment. Accordingly, the topsoil thickness presented on the logs should not be the sole basis for calculating topsoil stripping depths and volumes. If more accurate information is needed relating to thickness and topsoil quality definition, alternate methods of sample retrieval and testing should be employed. A.3 CLASSIFICATION METHODS Soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the Unified Soil Classification (USC) system. The USC system is described in ASTM: D2487 and D2488. Where laboratory classification tests (sieve analysis or Atterberg Limits) have been performed, accurate classifications per ASTM: D2487 are possible. Otherwise, soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are visual-manual judgments. Charts are attached which provide information on the USC system, the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs. The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and development can sometimes aid this judgment. Dr a f t ing a rog limited to abolimited to ab ovides what is knowvides what is mer lift and drop system, whicand drop system, whic aditional NN6060 values. By using values. By using generated by the drop hammer. Wd by the drop hammer. W ranging from 55% to over 100%. from 55% to over 10 T ch that hammeammer energies lie withienergies lie with ches. The currcurrent ASTM proceduASTM procedu more have been obve been o served. Althouserved. Althou rated method to date, we can stathod to date, we can s tter than the standard ASTM Methe standard ASTM Meth S)/Spin-up Samples (SU) )/Spin-up Samples (SU) “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs a uger disturbs tuger d he samples, possamples, poss e, e, contacts bcontacts b uulders, lders, venve 70 Item 8. Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0010684 Appendix A - Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS The groundwater level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The following information appears under “Water Level Measurements” on the logs: Date and Time of measurement Sampled Depth: lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement Casing Depth: depth to bottom of casing or hollow-stem auger at time of measurement Cave-in Depth: depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole Water Level: depth in the borehole where free water is encountered Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level, except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes. This is possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factors include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings, presence of drilling fluid, weather conditions, and use of borehole casing. A.5 LABORATORY TEST METHODS A.5.1 Water Content Tests Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-010, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM: D2216 and AASHTO: T265. A.5.2 Organic Content Tests Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-010, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM: D2974, Test Method C. A.6 TEST STANDARD LIMITATIONS Field and laboratory testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. A.7 SAMPLE STORAGE Unless notified to do otherwise, we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30 days. er i er condic erformed in general accon general accordance wrdance w , which is performed in general accerformed in general ac NS done in general conformance done in general conforman with the specified standard is neither ithe specified standard is neithe we routwe routinely retain retain 71 Item 8. 01REP051C (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. EXPLORATION/CLASSIFICATION METHODS SAMPLING METHODS Split-Spoon Samples (SS) - Calibrated to N60 Values Standard penetration (split-spoon) samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM: D1586 with one primary modification. The ASTM test method consists of driving a 2" O.D. split-barrel sampler into the in-situ soil with a 140-pound hammer dropped from a height of 30". The sampler is driven a total of 18" into the soil. After an initial set of 6", the number of hammer blows to drive the sampler the final 12" is known as the standard penetration resistance or N-value. Our method uses a modified hammer weight, which is determined by measuring the system energy using a Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and an instrumented rod. In the past, standard penetration N-value tests were performed using a rope and cathead for the lift and drop system. The energy transferred to the split-spoon sampler was typically limited to about 60% of its potential energy due to the friction inherent in this system. This converted energy then provides what is known as an N60 blow count. Most of today’s drill rigs incorporate an automatic hammer lift and drop system, which has higher energy efficiency and subsequently results in lower N-values than the traditional N60 values. By using the PDA energy measurement equipment, we are able to determine actual energy generated by the drop hammer. With the various hammer systems available, we have found highly variable energies ranging from 55% to over 100%. Therefore, the intent of AET’s hammer calibrations is to vary the hammer weight such that hammer energies lie within about 60% to 65% of the theoretical energy of a 140-pound weight falling 30". The current ASTM procedure acknowledges the wide variation in N-values, stating that N-values of 100% or more have been observed. Although we have not yet determined the statistical measurement uncertainty of our calibrated method to date, we can state that the accuracy deviations of the N- values using this method are significantly better than the standard ASTM Method. Disturbed Samples (DS)/Spin-up Samples (SU) Sample types described as “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger. Because the auger disturbs the samples, possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate. Sampling Limitations Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of drilling tools. Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs. CLASSIFICATION METHODS Soil classifications shown on the boring logs are based on the Unified Soil Classification (USC) system. The USC system is described in ASTM: D2487 and D2488. Where laboratory classification tests (sieve analysis or Atterberg Limits) have been performed, accurate classifications per ASTM: D2487 are possible. Otherwise, soil classifications shown on the boring logs are visual-manual judgments. Charts are attached which provide information on the USC system, the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs. The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and development can sometimes aid this judgment. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS The ground water level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The following information appears under “Water Level Measurements” on the logs: x Date and Time of measurement x Sampled Depth: lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement x Casing Depth: depth to bottom of casing or hollow-stem auger at time of measurement x Cave-in Depth: depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole x Water Level: depth in the borehole where free water is encountered x Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level, except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes. This is possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factors include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings, presence of drilling fluid, weather conditions, and use of borehole casing. SAMPLE STORAGE Unless notified to do otherwise, we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30 days. more o date, we cate, we c Method. Method. disturbed samples, which are takd samples, which are tak and contact depths should be considedepths should be conside een soil layersers are estimated based on are estimated based on jects generally cannot be recovered froerally cannot be recovered f logs. Dr a logs are based on the Unlogs are based on the Unified Soil Clasifi laboratory classification tests (sieveaboratory classification tests (sie an 7 are possible. Otherwise, soil clare possible. Otherwise, s assificassifi e information on the USC systeme information on the USC s arent geology. Tarent geology. T limited. Olimited. O 72 Item 8. 01CLS021 (01/2022)AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ASTM Designations: D 2487, D2488 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Soil Classification Notes ABased on the material passing the 3-in (75-mm) sieve. BIf field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name. CGravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay DSands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt SW-SC well-graded sand with clay SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay (D30)2 ECu = D60 /D10, Cc = D10 x D60 FIf soil contains >15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. GIf fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. HIf fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. IIf soil contains >15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. JIf Atterberg limits plot is hatched area, soil is a CL-ML silty clay. KIf soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200 add “with sand” or “with gravel”, whichever is predominant. LIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. MIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. NPl>4 and plots on or above “A” line. OPl<4 or plots below “A” line. PPl plots on or above “A” line. QPl plots below “A” line. RFiber Content description shown below. Group Symbol Group NameB Coarse-Grained Soils More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Gravels More than 50% coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels Less than 5% finesC Cu>4 and 1<Cc<3E GW Well graded gravelF Cu<4 and/or 1>Cc>3E GP Poorly graded gravelF Gravels with Fines more than 12% fines C Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelF.G.H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelF.G.H Sands 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Clean Sands Less than 5% finesD Cu>6 and 1<Cc<3E SW Well-graded sandI Cu<6 and/or 1>Cc>3 E SP Poorly-graded sandI Sands with Fines more than 12% fines D Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandG.H.I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandG.H.I Fine-Grained Soils 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve (see Plasticity Chart below) Silts and Clays Liquid limit less than 50 inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above “A” lineJ CL Lean clayK.L.M PI<4 or plots below “A” lineJ ML SiltK.L.M organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75 Liquid limit –not dried OL Organic clayK.L.M.N Organic siltK.L.M.O Silts and Clays Liquid limit 50 or more inorganic PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clayK.L.M PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic siltK.L.M organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75 Liquid limit –not dried OH Organic clayK.L.M.P Organic siltK.L.M.Q Highly organic soil Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic in odor PT PeatR 3 2 ½1 ¾4 10 20 40 60 140 200 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 81 Sieve NumberScreen Opening (in.) 50 10 5 1.0 0.10.5 PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS SIEVE ANALYSIS PE R C E N T P A S S I N G PE R C E N T R E T A I N E D D60 = 15mm D30 = 2.5mm D10 = 0.075mm Cu = = = 200D60 D10 15 0.075 Cc = = = 5.6(D30) D10 x D60 2.5 0.075 x 15 2 2 CL-ML For classification of fine-grained soils and fine-grained fraction of coarse-grained soils. Equation of "A"-line Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 25.5. then PI = 0.73 (LL-20) Equation of "U"-line Vertical at LL = 16 to PI = 7. then PI = 0.9 (LL-8) "A" L I N E "U" L I N E CL OR OL CH OR OH 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 16 7 4 PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X ( P I ) LIQUID LIMIT (LL) Plasticity Chart ADDITIONAL TERMINOLOGY NOTES USED BY AET FOR SOIL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION Grain Size Term Particle Size Boulders Over 12" Cobbles 3" to 12" Gravel #4 sieve to 3" Sand #200 to #4 sieve Fines (silt & clay) Pass #200 sieve Gravel Percentages Term Percent A Little Gravel 3% -14% With Gravel 15% -29% Gravelly 30% -50% Consistency of Plastic Soils Term N-Value, BPF Very Soft less than 2 Soft 2 -4 Firm 5 -8 Stiff 9 -15 Very Stiff 16 -30 Hard Greater than 30 Relative Density of Non-Plastic Soils Term N-Value, BPF Very Loose 0 - 4 Loose 5 - 10 Medium Dense 11 - 30 Dense 31 - 50 Very Dense Greater than 50 Moisture/Frost Condition (MC Column) D (Dry): Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to touch. M (Moist): Damp, although free water not visible. Soil may still have a high water content (over “optimum”). W (Wet/ Free water visible, intended to Waterbearing): describe non-plastic soils. Waterbearing usually relates to sands and sand with silt. F (Frozen): Soil frozen Layering Notes Laminations: Layers less than ½" thick of differing material or color. Lenses: Pockets or layers greater than ½" thick of differing material or color. Peat Description Fiber Content Term (Visual Estimate) Fibric Peat: Greater than 67% Hemic Peat: 33 –67% Sapric Peat: Less than 33% Organic Description (if no lab tests) Soils are described as organic, if soil is not peat and is judged to have sufficient organic fines content to influence the Liquid Limit properties. Slightly organic used for borderline cases. Root Inclusions With roots: Judged to have sufficient quantity of roots to influence the soil properties. Trace roots: Small roots present, but not judged to be in sufficient quantity to significantly affect soil properties. ML OR OL MH OR OHDr a f t OrganitttOrganic siltOrganic CHCH Fat clayFat clayK.L.MK.LffftftftMHMHElastic siltltK.L.MK.L.Mffftftftried<0.75at dried OH Organic clayOrganK.L.M.PMP afafaftaftaft Organic siltganic siltK.L organic matter, dark r, da r, and organic in odoric in odor PTPT PeatRafafafafaf DDDDDDr a DDDDDDDDDDD CL-MLCL-MDDDrra DDrraaa Dr a DD For classification of fine-grained soils and on of fine-gra Dr a fine-grained fraction of coarse-grained soilstion of coarse Dr a . DD Equation of "A"-lineEquation of "A Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 25.5.Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 25.5. then PI = 0.73 (LL-20)PI = 0.73 (LL- Equation of "U"-line"U"-line Vertical at LL = 16 to PI = 7.= 16 to PI = then PI = 0.9 (LL-8)L-8)DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDrrrrrrrr "U" L I N E DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 1010DD1010DD20DD30DD 40 DD 5050 77DDPL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X ( P I ) PL A S T I C I T Y I N D E X ( P I ) Drararaaa D 73 Item 8. PROJECT Moore Lake Park Improvements; Fridley, Minnesota AET NO. P-0010684 SUBJECT Boring Locations DATE March 2022 SCALE As Shown DRAWN BY RJO CHECKED BY TPV FIGURE 1 BͲ1 BͲ2 BͲ3 BͲ4 BͲ5 BͲ6BͲ7 BͲ8 BͲ9 BͲ10 BͲ11 BͲ12 B 4 BͲ6 BͲ8 Ͳ10 74 Item 8. !"#$%% & !'()*#$%''(!'(!#+,-.*!-%+ / !"#$%%&+#*0/* ,&1* 2% & !'(.'#(%(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&')- /* ,&1* 2% 3 4&#''%)*#$%'&1%)*#%+&')-/* ,& !&' !%56 7 4&/'#.056 8 4 79 4 4&1% )*#%+&/'#.0&' !%&,%56 48 4 8&#''%)*#$%'&)*#(&! 1 5 6 : ; :< : :< ; 49 = 7= 4 )= *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t aft ftftftftftftf aaaaraaaaaraaaaaraaaaaraaaaaraaaaraaaaaraaaaaraaaaraaaaaraaaaaraaaararDrDrDrra Dr a Dr a Dr arararararDrDrDrra Dr a Dr a Dr ara Dr a Dr a Dr ara Dr a Dr a DrrDrDrDrDrDrDrrarararDr a Dr a Dr a Drra Dr a Dr a Drra Dr a Dr a DrrarararDrDrDrDrDr a Dr a Dr a DrDr a Dr a Dr a DrrarararDr a Dr a Dr a Drra Dr a Dr a DrDr a Dr a DrDDDrDDrDrDDDrDrDrDDDrDrDrrDrDrDDDrDrDDrDrDDrrDrDDDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDDD ft rarftftftft 4&1% #''%)*#$%'&)*#(&! 1#''%)*#$%'&)*#(&! 1rDrD aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfra Dr 75 Item 8. B ; A ; !"#$%% & !'()*#$%''(!'(!#+,-.*!-%+ / !"#$%%&+#*0/* , & !'(.'#(%(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&+#*0 /* , /* , 4 7 &1%)*#%+&)*#(& !& ' !%5?6 &/'#.0&'%! 1!#+,-!' 56 9 4 8&/'#.0&! 15 6 :: :< < ; ; ; 49 = 7= 4 )= 2 *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t ftftftftftftf BB ;;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDDrara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDDrara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD ft D aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfa 76 Item 8. :A :A ; & !'(!#+&/* ,&1* 2% &F*% 1!#+#+.'#(%(!#+&#''% )*#$%'&/* ,#++#*0/* ,&1* 2% 3 & !'(!'(!#+,- *)#.1%!&+#*0 /* , 8 4&#''%)*#$%'&)*#(&' !%&'%! 1 .'#(%(!#+56 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&)*#(&! 1 1*56 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&$%*( !1156 : : : :B ; ; ; 49 = 7= 4 !/& !/& )= *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t raf t ftftftftftftf :A:A ;; rrDr aaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarararararrDrDr aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr arrDrDrrrDrDr aaaararararaaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarararararDrDrDr aaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaararararaaaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaaaaaaarararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDDr a DrDrDDrarrDrDrDrDDDr a DrDrDDr a DrDrDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDDrDrDDrrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDDrDrDDDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDDrDr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD ft #$%'&/* ,&$%*(#$%'&/* ,&$%*( DrD aftftaft ra Dr ftftftf Dr a 77 Item 8. B < !"#$%% & !'()*#$%''(!'(!#+,-.*!-%+ / !"#$%%&+#*0/* , & !'(!#+('%#.'#(&#''%)*#$%'&+#*0 /* , & !'(!'(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&/* , &/'#.0&'%! 1!'(!#+56 9 4 8&/'#.0,-)*#(&1*&'%! 1 !#+5 6 4&1%)*#%+&)*#(&,#%*/%#*)&' !% $%*(' !%56 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&)*#(&1*56 A :AB : A : : :: :< 49 = 7= 4 2 )= *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; : : C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' DDr a Dr a Dr a f t ftftftftftftf BBaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrDrDrDrDrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD ararararararrrrDrDrDrDrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrrDrDrDrDrDrD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrrDrDrDrDrDrD arararararrrrara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrD arararararrrDrDrDrDrDrDD ara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD ara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arararararrara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDDDDDDDDDD afffff !% $%'&)*#(&1*56$%'&)*#(&1*56D aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfa D 78 Item 8. : :: : !"#$%% & !'()*#$%''(!'(!#+&+#*0/* , /* , & !'(!'(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&)*#( 4&1%)*#%+&)*#( ')-/* ,& ! ,#%*/%#*)&%++%!% ' !%56 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&)*#(&!1156 :; :; :; :B A 49 = 7= 4 )= 2 *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t raf t ftftftftftftf :: :::aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrDrDrDrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD ararararararrrrDrDrDrDrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrrDrDrDrDrDrDDrrDrDrDrDrDrDD arararararrrrara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDD arararararrrDrDrDrDrDrDDD ara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD ara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arararararrara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDD arararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD af1156 D aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfa 79 Item 8. ; :; !"#$%% & !'()*#$%''(!'(!#+,-.*!-%+ / !"#$%%&+#*0/* ,&1* 2% & !'(.'#(%(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,& 1* 2% & !'(!#+,-!'&')-/* , 7 4&/'#.056 4&1%)*#%+&)*#(&,#%*/%#*)&' !% 56 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&)*#(&1*56 48 4 8&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,& ! 15 6 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&!11 56 :A B :< : : :< ; ; 49 = 7= 4 !/& !/& )= *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t aft ftftftftftftf ;;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a ara Dr a Dr a Dr a arararararDrDrDr ararararaarara Dr a Dr arrDr arararararrDrDr arara Dr a Dr a arara Dr a Dr a arararararrDrDr arararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDDr a DrDrDDrarrDrDrDrDDDr a DrDrDDr a DrDrDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDDrDrDDrrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDDrDrDDDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDDrDr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD ftaft ,& #$%'&/* ,&!11#$%'&/* ,&!11 DrD aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfaa Dr a 80 Item 8. A :A : : & !'(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&1* 2% & !'(!'(!#+&/* ,&1* 2% 8 4&1%)*#%+&/* ,&,%&' !% 56 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&1* 56 48 4 8&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,& !115 6 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&!11 56 :B :; : A : :B 49 = 7= 4 !/& !/& )= 1 *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t aft ftftftftftftf :A:A :aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a aara Dr a Dr a Dr a aarararararDrDrDr aararararaaarara Dr a Dr arDrDr aarararararrDrDr aarara Dr a Dr a aarara Dr a Dr a aarararararrDrDr aaaaararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr ara DrDrDrDDr a DrDrDDrarrDrDrDrDDDr a DrDrDDr a DrDrDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDDrDrDDrrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDDrDrDDDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDDrDr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD aft ,& #$%'&/* ,&!11#$%'&/* ,&!11 DrD aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfaa Dr a 81 Item 8. : : : !"#$%% & !'()*#$%''(!'(!#+&+#*0/* , & !'(!#+('%#.'#(&#''%)*#$%'& /* , & !'(!#+,-!'&1%)*#%+&/* , & !'(.'#(%(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&/'#.0 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&! 1 $%*(!1156 : A : :< : ; ; ; ; 49 = 7= 4 !/& )= *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 2 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' raf t ftftftftftftf :: :rrDrDrDrDrD aaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaararararararrrrDrDrDrDrDrDD aaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD aaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD aaaarara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrrDrDrDrDrDrDDrrDrDrDrDrDrDD aaaarararararrraaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaarara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrD aaaarara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDD aaaarararararrrDrDrDrDrDrDDD aaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaarararararraaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaarara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDD aaaaaaaaarararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD ft D aftftaft ra Dr ftftftf 82 Item 8. : B !"#$%% & !'()*#$%''(!'(!#+,-.*!-%+ / !"#$%%&+#*0/* ,&1* 2% & !'(.'#(%(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&)*#( /* ,&1* 2% ;3 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&$%*( !11565" !!/'%1''6 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&1* 56 48 4 8&#''%)*#$%',- !#+! %. //'%&/* ,#+')-/* ,&$%*( !115 6 : A : : : :; ; ; ; 49 = 7= 4 !/& !/& )= *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t aft ftftftftftftf :: rrDr aaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarararararrDrDr aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr arrDrDrrrDrDr aaaararararaaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaarararararDrDrDr aaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaararararaaaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a aaaarara Dr a Dr a aaaaaaaaarararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDDDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDrrDrDrDrDDDrDrDrDrrrDrDrDrDDDr a DrDrDDr a DrDrDDrarrDrDrDDDrDr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD ft '%)*#$%',-'%)*#$%',- #+')-/* ,&$%*(#+')-/* ,&$%*(DrD aftftaft ra Dr ftftftf Dr a 83 Item 8. ; ; !"#$%% & !'(!'(!#+,-)*#$%'#+.*!-%+ / !"#$%%&+#*0/* , & !'(.'#(%(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&/* , & !'(!'(!#+&#''%)*#$%'&/* , 88 4&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,&1* 56 48 4 8&#''%)*#$%'&/* ,& ! 1 1*5 6 B : :; :B : : : ; : ; 49 = 7= 4 !/& !/& )= *1#.%'%$# 9= 7 49 = 4974= 7 7 7 4 > 4 4 4 984 7 9 497 ? 47 4 4 4 4 !"# 9 98 4 = * @%.= 7 4 8 AA::A:?7?AA : ; < B :A :: : : :; C 8 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/012 &/3%(-4&/+&5%,.-&65$ ) 1 *)4 D?EAA *2 77 ' Dr a f t ftftftftftftf ;; aaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaarararararrrDrDrDrDrDrDDD aaaarararararraaaarara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDDrrDrDrDrDrD aaaarararararrrrrDrDrDrDrDrDD aaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD aaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD aaaararararararrrrDrDrDrDrDrDD aaaaaaaaarararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDDD aftftaft ra Dr ftftftf 84 Item 8. !"#$%& &'%()%()'%()%$$ *%+ $,!-( !"#$%& &'%()%()'%()%$$ '%.#. %,!-(%(),$%#/ 0"( *%( )$*1,!-(!,!-( !'+ &$!!' $%(%!(!"'%.#. %23 40 5,$%#/'!"$ ('!"'$&'%() -1!*%(#"( '2 3 0"( *%( )$*1,!-(-% , %(* + &$!!' 23 550%$$ *%+ $*%&"23 6 7 67 6 6 8 6 6 904 : ;: 0 *: "%# $ +%!( 4: ; 04 : 04;0: ;; ;0 < 00 0 450 ; 4 04; =0; 0 0 0 !"# 4 45 0!: !> #: ;0 5 7 ?766 76=;=77 6 @ 8 67 66 6 6 6 A 95 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/01%,.-&23$ !*!"9!(*0! B=C77 * 44 ' Dr a f Dr a f t ftftftftftftf aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrDrDr arara Dr a Dr a arararararrDrDr arara Dr a Dr a arara Dr a Dr arrDrDr arara Dr a Dr arrDrDr arararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a arara Dr a Dr a arara Dr a Dr a arararararDrDrDr ara Dr a Dr a Dr a ara Dr a Dr a Dr a ararararaara Dr a Dr a Dr a arara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDDr a DrDrDDrarrDrDrDrDDDr a DrDrDDr a DrDrDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDDrDrDDrrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDrDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDDrDrDDDrDrDDrrDrDrDDDrDrDrDDDrDr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD ftafraftftftft %(* %+ $*%&"23%+ $*%&"2 DrD aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfa Dr a 85 Item 8. 6 68 ? @ 6 @ 6 !'$&'%()%$$ *%+ $,!-( 0"( *%( )$*1,!-(!'$!!' $%(%!(!"'$&'%()-1!*%(#"( '23 50;400"( *%( ),$%#/!'$!!' !+ &$!!' 23 05 0 5%$$ *%+ $,!-( '!"!'""2 3 6 7 6 7 6 6 6 6 904 : ;: 0 5 !/& !/& *: "%# $ +%!( 4: ; 5 04 : 04;0: ;; ;0 < 00 0 450 ; 4 04; =0; 0 0 0 !"# 4 45 0!: !> #: ;0 5 7 ?766 76=;=77 6 @ 8 67 66 6 6 6 A 95 $!!%&'()&*(%)+,-.,/01%,.-&23$ !*!"9!(*0! B=C77 * 44 ' aft ?ftftftftftftf 66 @@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD ara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD arararararrrDrDrDrDrDrDDD arararararrarara Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDDrrDrDrDrDrD arararararrrrrDrDrDrDrDrDD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrD arara Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDD ararararararrrrDrDrDrDrDrDD arararararara Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a Dr a DrDrDrDrDrDrDrDrDD afftftftft !-( D aftftaft ra Dr ftftftfa 86 Item 8. Report of Geotechnical Exploration Moore Lake Park Building, Fridley, Minnesota August 3, 2022 AET Report No. P-0010684 Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Dr a f t ft ApA eport Limitations and Gumitations and Gu 87 Item 8. Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0010684 Appendix B – Page 1 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC B.1 REFERENCE This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks relating to subsurface problems which are caused by construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. This information was developed and provided by GBA1, of which, we are a member firm. B.2 RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION B.2.1 Understand the Geotechnical Engineering Services Provided for this Report Geotechnical engineering services typically include the planning, collection, interpretation, and analysis of exploratory data from widely spaced borings and/or test pits. Field data are combined with results from laboratory tests of soil and rock samples obtained from field exploration (if applicable), observations made during site reconnaissance, and historical information to form one or more models of the expected subsurface conditions beneath the site. Local geology and alterations of the site surface and subsurface by previous and proposed construction are also important considerations. Geotechnical engineers apply their engineering training, experience, and judgment to adapt the requirements of the prospective project to the subsurface model(s). Estimates are made of the subsurface conditions that will likely be exposed during construction as well as the expected performance of foundations and other structures being planned and/or affected by construction activities. The culmination of these geotechnical engineering services is typically a geotechnical engineering report providing the data obtained, a discussion of the subsurface model(s), the engineering and geologic engineering assessments and analyses made, and the recommendations developed to satisfy the given requirements of the project. These reports may be titled investigations, explorations, studies, assessments, or evaluations. Regardless of the title used, the geotechnical engineering report is an engineering interpretation of the subsurface conditions within the context of the project and does not represent a close examination, systematic inquiry, or thorough investigation of all site and subsurface conditions. B.2.2 Geotechnical Engineering Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects, and At Specific Times Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs, goals, and risk management preferences of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil-works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Likewise, geotechnical engineering services are performed for a specific project and purpose. For example, it is unlikely that a geotechnical engineering study for a refrigerated warehouse will be the same as one prepared for a parking garage; and a few borings drilled during a preliminary study to evaluate site feasibility will not be adequate to develop geotechnical design recommendations for the project. Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project or purpose; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, the reliability of a geotechnical-engineering report can be affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying the recommendations in it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis after the passage of time – if any is required at all – could prevent major problems. 1 Geoprofessional Business Association, 1300 Piccard Drive, LL14, Rockville, MD 20850 Telephone: 301/565-2733: www.geoprofessional.org, 2019 Dr a f t ini EstimaEs cted performcted perform es is typically a geotechnicalypically a geotechnica s), the engineering and geologic gineering and geologic ped to satisfy the given requiremey the given requiremef es, assessments, or evaluations.essments, or evalua ring interpretation ofpretation of the subsurfacthe subsurfaff xamination, systematic inquiry, osystematic inquiry, o Services are Performed for Specre Performed for Spec ure their services to meet ure their services to meet the spec cal engineering study conducted foal engineering study conducted r even a different civil engineerr even a different civil engineer ng report is ng rep unique, preparedpre g services are perg services are pe dy for a refridy for a refr g a prelg a pre rthrt 88 Item 8. Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0010684 Appendix B – Page 2 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC B.2.3 Read the Full Report Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical-engineering report did not read the report in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selective elements only. Read and refer to the report in full. B.2.4 You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer About Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project-specific factors when developing the scope of study behind this report and developing the confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site’s size or shape; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, function or weight of the proposed structure and the desired performance criteria; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project or site changes – even minor ones – and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. B.2.5 Most of the “Findings” Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site’s subsurface using various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing is performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgement to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ – maybe significantly – from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team through project completion to obtain informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. B.2.6 This Report’s Recommendations Are Confirmation-Dependent The recommendations included in this report – including any options or alternatives – are confirmation-dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgement and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions exposed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation-dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. B.2.7 This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals’ misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a continuing member of the design team, to: • confer with other design-team members; • help develop specifications; • review pertinent elements of other design professionals’ plans and specifications; and • be available whenever geotechnical engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction-phase observations. B.2.8 Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious Dr a f t project or site chaproject or site r who prepared this rho prepared this ep engineer was not informed aeer was not informed a Report Are Professional OpinionAre Professional Op ineers explore a site’s subsurfacexplore a site’s subsurfa bserve actual subsural subsurface conditionface conditiorr ata derived from that ed from that sampling and sampling and al judgement to form opiniment to form op ons abons a ns may differ – maybe significantlfer – maybe significant chnical engineer to servchnical engineer to s e on the nthe enever needed. enever needed. mmendatimmeons Are ConfirmatioConfirmatio ded in this report – includingded in this report – incl because the geotechnbecause the geotec technical engineetechnical engine ng constructng construct y do exisy do exi eeee 89 Item 8. Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0010684 Appendix B – Page 3 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you’ve included the material for information purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that “informational purposes” means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. B.2.9 Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This happens in part because soil and rock on project sites are typically heterogeneous and not manufactured materials with well-defined engineering properties like steel and concrete. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. B.2.10 Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study – e.g., a “phase-one” or “phase- two” environmental site assessment – differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually provide environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not obtained your own environmental information about the project site, ask your geotechnical consultant for a recommendation on how to find environmental risk-management guidance. B.2.11 Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, the engineer’s services were not designed, conducted, or intended to prevent migration of moisture – including water vapor – from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building- envelope or mold specialists. Dr a f t ine t have ha al engineers cal engineers c ese provisions indese provisions heir own responsibilitiesown responsibi ld respond fully and frankly. ond fully and fran vered to perform anrm an environmental stud environmenta gnificantly fromy from those used to perfoose used to per g report does not es usually provide usually provide ood of encountering undergroundncountering underground ntal problems have lems ha ed to project ed to proje e project site, ask yourite, as geotechnigeotechnir ment guidance. ent guidanc l Assistance to Assis Deal with MoistuDeal with Moi ngineer may have addressed grongineer may have addressed gro e not designed, conducted, oe not designed, conduc building slabs and wallsbuilding slabs and w ciencies. Accordiciencies. Accord e sufficient toe sufficient to d specd spec 90 Item 8. 91 Item 8. PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PATH (BY OTHERS) BIOCHAR AND IRON ENHANCED SAND 7,100 SF (SEE DETAIL 4&5/C802) EXCAVATE MUCK FROM CHANNEL ENTRANCE. EXCAVATE TO APPROXIMATE ELEVATION 874. 874 874 875 876 877 878 875 876 878 879 877 872 873874875 876877 878879 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 880 880879.50 880 879.5 0 880 880 879 . 5 0 880881 881 881 881 880 879 3:1 3:1 3:1 3:1 3:1 3:1 3:1 EOF= 879.90 10' GRADE CHANNEL END INTO EXISTING GRADE CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST GRADING TO AVOID DISTURBING BRIDGE ABUTMENTS 4:1 4:1 3:1 3:1 PROPOSED CURBCUT (BY OTHERS) ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 15 ft. 0153015 C-301 GRADING PLAN DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LICENSE NO.: DWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT NO.:227704093 U: \ 2 2 7 7 0 4 0 9 3 \ d r a f t i n g \ 5 _ D E S I G N \ 1 _ C A D \ 3 P L A N S H E E T S \ C - 3 0 1 G R A D I N G P L A N . d w g DE S C R I P T I O N : DA T E : ISSUE NO.: IS S U E N O . : SHEET NO.: SHEET TITLE: 9/ 9 / 2 0 2 2 2 : 2 3 : 2 2 P M CLIENT: EA S T M O O R E L A K E B I O C H A R - A N D IR O N - E N H A N C E D S A N D F I L T E R CI T Y O F F R I D L E Y AN O K A C O U N T Y , M N PR O J E C T T I T L E : JTW CHK'D BY:EAM APP'D BY:ERM CERTIFICATION: 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWY SUITE 300 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 PHONE: 763-252-6800 FAX: 952-831-1268 WWW.STANTEC.COM 09/09/2022 2 1 08 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 2 9 0 % P L A N S U B M I T T A L CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071 UNIVERSITY AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 PHONE: 763-571-3450 2 09 / 0 9 / 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 % P L A N S U B M I T T A L 57794 09/09/2022 EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN G G EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE OU EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING STORM SEWER INLET EXISTING STORM SEWER INLET EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING WATER VALVEWV DYH EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE X X EXISTING FENCE LINE EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION BIOCHAR AND IRON ENHANCED SAND PROPOSED ASPHALT SURFACE (BY OTHERS) NE C E N T R A L A V E 92 Item 8. Exhibit B Moore Lake Park Building - Proposal Summary Proposer Staff Ranking (0-100) Project Duration (Mo.) Onsite Supervision Base Fee 1 % Fee2 H+U Construction 80.10 20 Full-Time 351,090.00$ 1.25% Krause-Anderson 87.66 13 Full-Time 286,782.00$ 1.95% RJM Construction 80.30 12 Part-Time 276,350.00$ 2.45% Note: 1. Based on $3,000,000 construction cost 2. Additional fee for construction exceeding $3,000,000 93 Item 8. 94 Item 8. 95 Item 8. 96 Item 8. 97 Item 8. 98 Item 8. 99 Item 8. 100 Item 8. 101 Item 8. 102 Item 8. 103 Item 8. 104 Item 8. 105 Item 8. 106 Item 8. 107 Item 8. 108 Item 8. 109 Item 8. 110 Item 8. 111 Item 8. 112 Item 8. 113 Item 8. 114 Item 8. 115 Item 8. 116 Item 8. 117 Item 8. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Roberta Collins, Assistant to the City Manager Title Resolution No. 2022-109, Approving Claims for the Period Ending September 21, 2022 Background Attached is Resolution No. 2022-109 and the Claims Report for the period ending September 21, 2022. Financial Impact Included in the budget. Recommendation Staff recommend adopting Resolution No. 2022-109. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building X Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-109  City Council Claims Report 118 Item 9. Resolution No. 2022-109 Approving Claims for the Period Ending September 21, 2022 Whereas, Minnesota Statute § 412.271 generally requires the City Council to review and approve claims for goods and services prior to the release of payment; and Whereas, a list of such claims for the period ending September 21, 2022, was reviewed by the City Council. Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves the payment of the claims as presented. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day of September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor Attest: Melissa Moore – City Clerk 119 Item 9. 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 1 of 21 Council Claims Report City of Fridley, MN By Fund Payment Dates 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Fund: 101 - General Fund Vendor: 13268 - 121 BENEFITS 950.00CITY OF FRIDLEY HLTH REIMB …INV002718009/16/2022DFT0004072 101-213150 Health Reimb HRA/Veba & HSA…09/16/2022 Vendor 13268 - 121 BENEFITS Total:950.00 Vendor: 10195 - AUTONATION FORD WHITE BEAR LAKE 143.52AUTO PARTS24590309/20/2022198034 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/20/2022 12.56AUTO PARTS24614409/20/2022198034 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/20/2022 150.55CAR PARTS - VEHICLE 63324626709/20/2022198034 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/20/2022 99.75CAR PARTS - VEHICLE 37124658509/20/2022198034 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/20/2022 Vendor 10195 - AUTONATION FORD WHITE BEAR LAKE Total:406.38 Vendor: Ppt ID: 307066 - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-457 17,394.65CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA Ppt ID: …INV002716309/16/2022848 101-213260 Deferred Comp.-ICMA 457 plan 09/16/2022 3,491.41CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA Ppt ID: …INV002716409/16/2022848 101-213260 Deferred Comp.-ICMA 457 plan 09/16/2022 Vendor Ppt ID: 307066 - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-457 Total:20,886.06 Vendor: 267997 - FFFA DUES - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-IAFF DUES/INTL ASSOC/FIRE FIGHTERS 60.00FF DUES - LOCAL #1986INV002717909/16/2022849 101-213230 Union Dues - FT Fire 09/16/2022 Vendor 267997 - FFFA DUES - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-IAFF DUES/INTL ASSOC/FIRE FIGHTERS Total:60.00 Vendor: Ppt ID: 803502 - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-RHS 352.88CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA Ppt ID: …INV002716709/16/2022850 101-213280 RHS Plan (ICMA)09/16/2022 75.00CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA Ppt ID: …INV002717509/16/2022850 101-213280 RHS Plan (ICMA)09/16/2022 2,325.00CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA Ppt ID …INV002717609/16/2022850 101-213280 RHS Plan (ICMA)09/16/2022 525.00CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA Ppt ID: …INV002717709/16/2022850 101-213280 RHS Plan (ICMA)09/16/2022 Vendor Ppt ID: 803502 - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-RHS Total:3,277.88 Vendor: Ppt ID: 705060 - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-ROTH 4,335.12CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA Ppt ID: …INV002717809/16/2022851 101-213270 ICMA Roth IRA 09/16/2022 Vendor Ppt ID: 705060 - CITY OF FRIDLEY ICMA-ROTH Total:4,335.12 Vendor: 13998 - EMPOWER RETIREMENT (for MN/MSRS) 2,002.93CITY OF FRIDLEY MNDCP Ppt ID…INV002716109/16/2022DFT0004063 101-213260 Deferred Comp.-ICMA 457 plan 09/16/2022 1,192.83CITY OF FRIDLEY MNDCP Ppt ID…INV002716209/16/2022DFT0004064 101-213260 Deferred Comp.-ICMA 457 plan 09/16/2022 Vendor 13998 - EMPOWER RETIREMENT (for MN/MSRS) Total:3,195.76 Vendor: 10649 - ESCH CONSTRUCTIONS SUPPLY INC -351.48CREDIT FOR CAR PARTS - VEHI…CM120809/14/2022197974 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…04/29/2022 91.93CAR PARTS - VEHICLE 611INV2233809/14/2022197974 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…05/12/2022 351.48CAR PARTS - VEH 611INV20677.009/14/2022197974 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/14/2022 Vendor 10649 - ESCH CONSTRUCTIONS SUPPLY INC Total:91.93 120 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 2 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 10717 - FLEET PRIDE TRUCK & TRAILER PARTS 21.57INVENTORY AUTO PARTS10211457509/21/2022198046 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/21/2022 Vendor 10717 - FLEET PRIDE TRUCK & TRAILER PARTS Total:21.57 Vendor: 10745 - FRIDLEY FIRE RELIEF ASSOC 650.00MONTHLY VOL FF PAYROLL C…INV002716809/14/2022198017 101-213290 Union Dues - POC/Vol Fire 09/16/2022 Vendor 10745 - FRIDLEY FIRE RELIEF ASSOC Total:650.00 Vendor: 10748 - FRIDLEY POLICE ASSOCIATION 196.00BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL CONTRIB…INV002716609/14/2022198018 101-213330 Fridley Police Association 09/16/2022 Vendor 10748 - FRIDLEY POLICE ASSOCIATION Total:196.00 Vendor: 10782 - GENUINE PARTS CO/NAPA 64.37CAR PARTS- VEHICLE 3034342-88306409/19/2022198021 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/19/2022 -1.29DISCOUNT4342-883064D09/19/2022198021 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/19/2022 64.11CAR PARTS - VEHICLE 6334342-88333709/21/2022198047 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/21/2022 -1.28DISCOUNT4342-883337D09/21/2022198047 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/21/2022 135.73CAR PARTS - VEHICLE 5434342-88343809/21/2022198047 101-141010 Inventory - Fuel 09/21/2022 -2.71DISCOUNT4342-883438D09/21/2022198047 101-141010 Inventory - Fuel 09/21/2022 64.11CAR PARTS - VEHICLE 6334342-88345709/21/2022198047 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/21/2022 -1.28DISCOUNT4342-883457D09/21/2022198047 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/21/2022 Vendor 10782 - GENUINE PARTS CO/NAPA Total:321.76 Vendor: 13823 - HOME DEPOT - FRIDLEY 100.00CHRISTMAS TREE LOT DEPOSIT…2022919 - 3508909/19/2022198023 101-221100 Deposits 09/19/2022 Vendor 13823 - HOME DEPOT - FRIDLEY Total:100.00 Vendor: 12450 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE - PAYROLL TAXES 42,281.48BI-WEEKLY SOCIAL SECURITY …INV002718109/16/2022DFT0004073 101-212120 FICA Payable 09/16/2022 15,316.84BI-WEEKLY MEDICARE WITHH…INV002718209/16/2022DFT0004074 101-212130 Medicare Payable 09/16/2022 48,738.16BI-WEEKLY FEDERAL TAX WIT…INV002718409/16/2022DFT0004076 101-212100 Federal Tax Withheld 09/16/2022 Vendor 12450 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE - PAYROLL TAXES Total:106,336.48 Vendor: 11298 - MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 14,003.14UNLEADED FUEL2359158909/14/2022197991 101-141010 Inventory - Fuel 09/14/2022 Vendor 11298 - MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Total:14,003.14 Vendor: 11427 - MINN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 842.63BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTI…INV002716009/14/2022198019 101-213300 Child Support Withheld 09/16/2022 Vendor 11427 - MINN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER Total:842.63 Vendor: 12451 - MINN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - PAYROLL TAXES 22,237.55BI-WEEKLY STATE INCOME TAX…INV002718309/16/2022DFT0004075 101-212110 State Tax Withheld 09/16/2022 Vendor 12451 - MINN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - PAYROLL TAXES Total:22,237.55 Vendor: 11437 - MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 2,704.65STATE SURCHARGE-AUGAUG 202209/19/2022198027 101-203130 Surtax/Surcharge 09/19/2022 -54.09DISCOUNTAUG 2022D09/19/2022198027 101-203130 Surtax/Surcharge 09/19/2022 Vendor 11437 - MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Total:2,650.56 121 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 3 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 12443 - OPTUM BANK (HSA) 3,010.66HSA SAVINGS ACCT - EMPLOY…INV002717109/16/2022DFT0004068 101-213150 Health Reimb HRA/Veba & HSA…09/16/2022 Vendor 12443 - OPTUM BANK (HSA) Total:3,010.66 Vendor: 11685 - PERA - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 40,688.73BI-WEEKLY DEDUCTION - COO…INV002717209/16/2022DFT0004069 101-213100 PERA 09/16/2022 164.46BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTI…INV002717309/16/2022DFT0004070 101-213100 PERA 09/16/2022 55,495.29BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTI…INV002717409/16/2022DFT0004071 101-213100 PERA 09/16/2022 Vendor 11685 - PERA - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Total:96,348.48 Vendor: 12081 - STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY (LIFE) 161.96SEPT LIFE RETIREE & POCSEPT 202209/14/2022198007 101-213170 Life Insurance Payable 09/14/2022 2,396.06SEPT LIFESEPT 202209/14/2022198007 101-213170 Life Insurance Payable 09/14/2022 Vendor 12081 - STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY (LIFE) Total:2,558.02 Vendor: 12082 - STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY LTD/STD 3,195.03SEPT LONG TERM DISABILITYSEPT 202209/14/2022198008 101-213200 Long Term Disability Withhold…09/14/2022 3,807.49SEPT SHORT TERM DISABILITYSEPT 202209/14/2022198008 101-213205 Short Term Disability 09/14/2022 Vendor 12082 - STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY LTD/STD Total:7,002.52 Vendor: 12087 - STAR TRIBUNE 1,342.08TIF DISCLOSURE, I004320889971 08/2209/14/2022198009 101-132200 Due from HRA 09/14/2022 Vendor 12087 - STAR TRIBUNE Total:1,342.08 Vendor: 12122 - SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 668.20TIRES - VEHICLE 6331018896809/21/2022198059 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/21/2022 Vendor 12122 - SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC Total:668.20 Vendor: 12237 - TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC 71.39CAR PARTS - VEHICLE 543A0886809/21/2022198060 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & Suppl…09/21/2022 Vendor 12237 - TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC Total:71.39 291,564.17 Division: 111 - Legislative Vendor: 13933 - TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC 154.00CITY COUNCIL MINUTESM2753209/14/2022198012 101-1110-635100 City Council / Services Contrac…09/14/2022 154.00PARKS & RECREATION COMM…M2753209/14/2022198012 101-1110-635100 City Council / Services Contrac…09/14/2022 154.00CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-8/22M2759409/14/2022198012 101-1110-635100 City Council / Services Contrac…09/14/2022 Vendor 13933 - TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC Total:462.00 Division 111 - Legislative Total:462.00 Division: 127 - Communications & Engagement Vendor: 10581 - DO-GOOD BIZ INC 841.61SEP/OCT NEWSLETTER MAILI…15187-0109/14/2022197971 101-1270-633120 Comm & Engage / Communicat…09/14/2022 Vendor 10581 - DO-GOOD BIZ INC Total:841.61 Vendor: 10817 - GRAFIK DISTINCTION INC 1,400.00CREATIVE DESIGN-SEPT/OCT N…2082009/19/2022198022 101-1270-631100 Comm & Engage / Services-Pro…09/19/2022 Vendor 10817 - GRAFIK DISTINCTION INC Total:1,400.00 122 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 4 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 12438 - GREENHAVEN PRINTING 4,659.13NEWSLETTER PRINTING SEP/O…22344709/14/2022197978 101-1270-633110 Comm & Engage / Printing & B…09/14/2022 Vendor 12438 - GREENHAVEN PRINTING Total:4,659.13 Division 127 - Communications & Engagement Total:6,900.74 Division: 128 - City Clerk Vendor: 12077 - ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC 27.90CITY STAMP FOR SERVICESIV0053340109/14/2022198006 101-1280-621120 City Clerk / Office Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 12077 - ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC Total:27.90 Division 128 - City Clerk Total:27.90 Division: 131 - Accounting Vendor: 11475 - MINN SECRETARY OF STATE 120.00NOTARY APPLICATION FOR JS2022913 - 3517309/14/2022197995 101-1310-632100 Accounting / Dues & Subscript…09/14/2022 Vendor 11475 - MINN SECRETARY OF STATE Total:120.00 Division 131 - Accounting Total:120.00 Division: 133 - Information Technology Vendor: 10395 - CENTURY LINK 66.66PHONE SERVICE 763 574-2480…2480 360 09/2209/14/2022197968 101-1330-633120 IT / Communication (phones, …09/14/2022 Vendor 10395 - CENTURY LINK Total:66.66 Vendor: 10738 - FRANZ REPROGRAPHICS 243.75INK FOR ENGINEERING PLOTT…244873-009/14/2022197976 101-1330-621130 IT / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 10738 - FRANZ REPROGRAPHICS Total:243.75 Vendor: 11238 - LOFFLER COMPANIES-131511 56.45AUG COPIER/PRINTER CHGS413525609/14/2022197989 101-1330-635100 IT / Services Contracted, Non-…09/14/2022 Vendor 11238 - LOFFLER COMPANIES-131511 Total:56.45 Vendor: 11918 - ROSEVILLE, CITY OF 4,051.02SEP PHONE CHGS023122609/14/2022198004 101-1330-633120 IT / Communication (phones, …09/14/2022 Vendor 11918 - ROSEVILLE, CITY OF Total:4,051.02 Division 133 - Information Technology Total:4,417.88 Division: 211 - Police Vendor: 14366 - BLUE AND BROWN BACKGROUNDS LLC 300.00POST TRAINING BACKGROUND…202299 - 3511509/14/2022197963 101-2110-632120 Police / Conferences & School 09/14/2022 Vendor 14366 - BLUE AND BROWN BACKGROUNDS LLC Total:300.00 Vendor: 10395 - CENTURY LINK 106.40PHONE SERVICE 612E830233 …0233 605 09/2209/14/2022197968 101-2110-633120 Police / Communication (phon…09/14/2022 Vendor 10395 - CENTURY LINK Total:106.40 Vendor: 10638 - EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES 221.76BUILDING CELL PHONE ENHA…SP2200909/14/2022197972 101-2110-621150 Police / Tools & Minor Equipm…09/14/2022 135.00INSTALL BUILDING CELL PHONE…SP2200909/14/2022197972 101-2110-635100 Police / Services Contracted, N…09/14/2022 Vendor 10638 - EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Total:356.76 123 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 5 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 10899 - HEALTH PARTNERS 1,942.00PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL895309/21/2022198050 101-2110-631100 Police / Services-Professional 09/21/2022 Vendor 10899 - HEALTH PARTNERS Total:1,942.00 Vendor: 11153 - HIRERIGHT LLC 10.35AUG BACKGROUND SCREEN S…H021469809/14/2022197980 101-2110-635100 Police / Services Contracted, N…09/14/2022 Vendor 11153 - HIRERIGHT LLC Total:10.35 Vendor: 14369 - LAW ENFORCEMENT SEMINARS LLC 395.00INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGAT…202389409/14/2022197986 101-2110-632120 Police / Conferences & School 09/14/2022 Vendor 14369 - LAW ENFORCEMENT SEMINARS LLC Total:395.00 Vendor: 12115 - STREICHER'S 276.08DUTY AMMUNITIONI158691809/14/2022198010 101-2110-621130 Police / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 12115 - STREICHER'S Total:276.08 Vendor: 12313 - VERIZON WIRELESS 1,845.65CELL PHONES-POLICE, ACCT 4…991467115309/14/2022198013 101-2110-633120 Police / Communication (phon…09/14/2022 Vendor 12313 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total:1,845.65 Division 211 - Police Total:5,232.24 Division: 215 - Emergency Management Vendor: 12313 - VERIZON WIRELESS 41.51CELL PHONES-EOC, ACCT 4422…991467115309/14/2022198013 101-2150-633120 Emergency Mgmt / Communic…09/14/2022 Vendor 12313 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total:41.51 Division 215 - Emergency Management Total:41.51 Division: 219 - Fire Vendor: 10069 - ALBRECHT SIGN COMPANY 145.00VINYL GRAPHICS FOR HELMETS2784709/14/2022197957 101-2190-621110 Fire / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 Vendor 10069 - ALBRECHT SIGN COMPANY Total:145.00 Vendor: 10178 - ASPEN MILLS INC 118.60INITIAL ISSUE-LUCHT CHW29975009/14/2022197960 101-2190-621110 Fire / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 Vendor 10178 - ASPEN MILLS INC Total:118.60 Vendor: 10295 - BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 48.29MEDICAL EXAM GLOVES8466148709/14/2022197964 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 167.45MEDICAL EXAM GLOVES8466371609/14/2022197964 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 202.74N95 MASKS8466805709/14/2022197964 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 10295 - BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC Total:418.48 Vendor: 10395 - CENTURY LINK 356.88PHONE SERVICE 612 Z010545 …0545 311 09/2209/14/2022197968 101-2190-633120 Fire / Communication (phones,…09/14/2022 Vendor 10395 - CENTURY LINK Total:356.88 Vendor: 10899 - HEALTH PARTNERS 782.00PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL895309/21/2022198050 101-2190-631100 Fire / Services-Professional 09/21/2022 Vendor 10899 - HEALTH PARTNERS Total:782.00 124 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 6 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 14164 - JONES & BARTLETT LEARNING LLC 531.98TEXTBOOKS FOR INSTRUCTOR I56392309/14/2022197983 101-2190-632120 Fire / Conferences & School 09/14/2022 Vendor 14164 - JONES & BARTLETT LEARNING LLC Total:531.98 Vendor: 11093 - K & S ENGRAVING LLC 88.00PAR TAGS ENGRAVED1228809/14/2022197984 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 11093 - K & S ENGRAVING LLC Total:88.00 Vendor: 11283 - MAC QUEEN EMERGENCY 1,438.00SCBA MASKSP0328109/14/2022197990 101-2190-621110 Fire / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 454.91PIKE POLE REPLACEMENTSP0328409/14/2022197990 101-2190-621150 Fire / Tools & Minor Equipment 09/14/2022 Vendor 11283 - MAC QUEEN EMERGENCY Total:1,892.91 Vendor: 11785 - PREMIUM WATERS INC 98.39WATER FOR RESPONSES31887814809/14/2022198000 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 -93.89WATER-CREDIT DUPL PMT 318…31887814809/14/2022198000 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 5.99WATER FOR RESPONSES31896276509/14/2022198000 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 11785 - PREMIUM WATERS INC Total:10.49 Division 219 - Fire Total:4,344.34 Division: 311 - Campus Facilities Vendor: 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 32.94FLOOR MATS - CH629004372309/14/2022197959 101-3110-621110 Facilities / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 63.32FLOOR MATS & SHOP TOWELS …629004372409/14/2022197959 101-3110-621110 Facilities / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 19.69UNIFORMS - FACILITIES629004374109/14/2022197959 101-3110-621110 Facilities / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 32.94FLOOR MATS - CH629004621309/21/2022198041 101-3110-621110 Facilities / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 63.32FLOOR MATS & SHOP TOWELS …629004622009/21/2022198041 101-3110-621110 Facilities / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 19.69UNIFORMS - FACILITIES629004624609/21/2022198041 101-3110-621110 Facilities / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 Vendor 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Total:231.90 Vendor: 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO 2,384.71UTILITIES 10791004-41004-4 09/2209/19/2022198020 101-3110-634100 Facilities / Utility Services 09/19/2022 552.25UTILITIES 10791005-11005-1 09/2209/19/2022198020 101-3110-634100 Facilities / Utility Services 09/19/2022 Vendor 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO Total:2,936.96 Vendor: 13800 - DRIVEN WILD GOOSE CONTROL 420.00AUG GOOSE CONTROL311209/20/2022198039 101-3110-635100 Facilities / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 Vendor 13800 - DRIVEN WILD GOOSE CONTROL Total:420.00 Vendor: 13207 - VTI SECURITY / VIDEO TRONIX INC 1,232.50REPAIR PW READERS16991709/14/2022198014 101-3110-635100 Facilities / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 Vendor 13207 - VTI SECURITY / VIDEO TRONIX INC Total:1,232.50 Vendor: 12402 - XCEL ENERGY 11,381.40UTILITIES 51-4330624-779525217709/19/2022198029 101-3110-634100 Facilities / Utility Services 09/19/2022 Vendor 12402 - XCEL ENERGY Total:11,381.40 Division 311 - Campus Facilities Total:16,202.76 125 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 7 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Division: 315 - Forestry Vendor: 12498 - BIRCH TREE CARE LLC 17,350.00STUMP GRINDING/SOIL SEED-…3941109/14/2022197962 101-3150-635100 Forestry / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 Vendor 12498 - BIRCH TREE CARE LLC Total:17,350.00 Vendor: 10786 - GERTENS GREENHOUSE INC 284.00TREES FOR FRIDLEY TREE SALE697337/609/21/2022198048 101-3150-621140 Forestry / Supplies for Repair &…09/21/2022 Vendor 10786 - GERTENS GREENHOUSE INC Total:284.00 Vendor: 11346 - MENARDS - FRIDLEY 119.88TREE WATERING BAGS7460709/14/2022197993 101-3150-621140 Forestry / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 Vendor 11346 - MENARDS - FRIDLEY Total:119.88 Division 315 - Forestry Total:17,753.88 Division: 316 - Parks Vendor: 10158 - APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA 1,063.50TRASH CAN LINERS - PARKS22344509/14/2022197958 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/14/2022 -10.64DISCOUNT223445D09/14/2022197958 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/14/2022 Vendor 10158 - APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA Total:1,052.86 Vendor: 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 67.77UNIFORMS - PARKS629004373109/14/2022197959 101-3160-621110 Parks / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 67.77UNIFORMS - PARKS629004622609/21/2022198041 101-3160-621110 Parks / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 Vendor 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Total:135.54 Vendor: 10390 - CENTRAL TURF & IRRIGATION SUPPLY 349.74IRRIGATION SUPPLIES-MADSE…6081280-0009/14/2022197967 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/14/2022 Vendor 10390 - CENTRAL TURF & IRRIGATION SUPPLY Total:349.74 Vendor: 10924 - HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG 470.90ATHLETIC FIELD PAINT0016958-IN09/14/2022197981 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/14/2022 Vendor 10924 - HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG Total:470.90 Vendor: 11346 - MENARDS - FRIDLEY 9.37LIGHT SWITCHES-COMMONS …7279609/14/2022197993 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/14/2022 13.79SCREW DRIVER SET7279609/14/2022197993 101-3160-621150 Parks / Tools & Minor Equipm…09/14/2022 167.67BOARDS FOR HOCKEY RINKS7497409/21/2022198053 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/21/2022 -89.48MENARDS REBATE74974D09/21/2022198053 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/21/2022 141.73LUMBER FOR PARK BENCHES-…7501909/21/2022198053 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/21/2022 Vendor 11346 - MENARDS - FRIDLEY Total:243.08 Vendor: 11667 - ON SITE COMPANIES 158.00TOILET RENTAL-MOORE LAKE000140242909/14/2022197999 101-3160-635110 Parks / Rentals 09/14/2022 26.00TOILET RENTAL-TIPPED UNIT IN…000140271909/21/2022198056 101-3160-635110 Parks / Rentals 09/21/2022 26.00TOILET RENTAL-MOORE LAKE000140473809/21/2022198056 101-3160-635110 Parks / Rentals 09/21/2022 26.00TOILET RENTAL-MOORE LAKE000140473909/21/2022198056 101-3160-635110 Parks / Rentals 09/21/2022 Vendor 11667 - ON SITE COMPANIES Total:236.00 126 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 8 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 12237 - TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC 220.47LAWN MOWER BLADESA0886709/21/2022198060 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair & …09/21/2022 Vendor 12237 - TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC Total:220.47 Vendor: 12402 - XCEL ENERGY 37.05UTILITIES 51-5926810-779493327209/19/2022198029 101-3160-634100 Parks / Utility Services 09/19/2022 Vendor 12402 - XCEL ENERGY Total:37.05 Division 316 - Parks Total:2,745.64 Division: 317 - Lighting Vendor: 12402 - XCEL ENERGY 52.56UTILITIES 51-0013256055-279502443609/19/2022198029 101-3170-634100 Lighting / Utility Services 09/19/2022 51.81UTILITIES 51-0013256071-279504767109/19/2022198029 101-3170-634100 Lighting / Utility Services 09/19/2022 Vendor 12402 - XCEL ENERGY Total:104.37 Division 317 - Lighting Total:104.37 Division: 318 - Streets Vendor: 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 62.31UNIFORMS - STREETS629004372909/14/2022197959 101-3180-621110 Streets / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 62.31UNIFORMS - STREETS629004622409/21/2022198041 101-3180-621110 Streets / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 Vendor 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Total:124.62 Vendor: 10449 - COMMERCIAL ASPHALT 301.75ASPHALT- STREET DEPT22091509/21/2022198043 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/21/2022 Vendor 10449 - COMMERCIAL ASPHALT Total:301.75 Vendor: 11322 - MC TOOL & SAFETY 92.90SAFETY CLOTHING01448109/21/2022198052 101-3180-621110 Streets / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 536.90CHAIN SAW BLADE01448109/21/2022198052 101-3180-621150 Streets / Tools & Minor Equip…09/21/2022 -6.30DISCOUNT014481D09/21/2022198052 101-3180-621150 Streets / Tools & Minor Equip…09/21/2022 Vendor 11322 - MC TOOL & SAFETY Total:623.50 Vendor: 13152 - OMANN CONTRACTING CO 655.65ASHPALT1635109/14/2022197998 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 372.00ASHPALT1635309/14/2022197998 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 150.00TACK OIL1636809/14/2022197998 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 465.00ASHPALT1636809/14/2022197998 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 464.07ASHPALT1637809/14/2022197998 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 372.93ASHPALT1641109/14/2022197998 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 465.93ASHPALT1639809/21/2022198054 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/21/2022 524.79ASHPALT1640309/21/2022198054 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/21/2022 372.93ASHPALT1641809/21/2022198054 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/21/2022 615.00ASHPALT1642809/21/2022198054 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/21/2022 Vendor 13152 - OMANN CONTRACTING CO Total:4,458.30 127 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 9 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 11645 - O'MARA BRANDON 87.49SAFETY BOOT REIMB-BRAND…2022919 - 3528409/21/2022198055 101-3180-621110 Streets / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 Vendor 11645 - O'MARA BRANDON Total:87.49 Vendor: 11720 - PEARSON BROS INC 179,230.20SEALCOATING558109/21/2022198057 101-3180-635100 Streets / Services Contracted, …09/21/2022 Vendor 11720 - PEARSON BROS INC Total:179,230.20 Vendor: 12854 - TAPCO-TRAFFIC & PARKING CONTROL 2,267.49STREET SIGN WITH BLINKERSI72874609/14/2022198011 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repair &…09/14/2022 Vendor 12854 - TAPCO-TRAFFIC & PARKING CONTROL Total:2,267.49 Division 318 - Streets Total:187,093.35 Division: 319 - Fleet Services: Garage/Shop Vendor: 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 103.59UNIFORMS - FLEET629004373709/14/2022197959 101-3190-621110 Fleet Services / Clothing & Lau…09/14/2022 49.63UNIFORMS - FLEET629004624509/21/2022198041 101-3190-621110 Fleet Services / Clothing & Lau…09/21/2022 Vendor 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Total:153.22 Vendor: 10395 - CENTURY LINK 373.86PHONE SERVICE 612 Z010546 …0546 766 09/2209/14/2022197968 101-3190-633120 Fleet Services / Communication 09/14/2022 Vendor 10395 - CENTURY LINK Total:373.86 Division 319 - Fleet Services: Garage/Shop Total:527.08 Division: 410 - Recreation Vendor: 12776 - AE SIGN SYSTEMS 98.54PARK BENCH PLAQUE-SEDERS…2240309/14/2022197956 101-4100-621130 Rec / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 12776 - AE SIGN SYSTEMS Total:98.54 Vendor: 10581 - DO-GOOD BIZ INC 841.61SEP/OCT REC BROCHURE MAIL…15187-0109/14/2022197971 101-4100-633120 Rec / Communication (phones,…09/14/2022 Vendor 10581 - DO-GOOD BIZ INC Total:841.61 Vendor: 10817 - GRAFIK DISTINCTION INC 1,200.00CREATIVE DESIGN-SEPT/OCT R…2082009/19/2022198022 101-4100-631100 Rec / Services-Professional 09/19/2022 Vendor 10817 - GRAFIK DISTINCTION INC Total:1,200.00 Vendor: 12438 - GREENHAVEN PRINTING 2,721.00REC BROCHURE PRINTING SEP…22344709/14/2022197978 101-4100-633110 Rec / Printing & Binding 09/14/2022 Vendor 12438 - GREENHAVEN PRINTING Total:2,721.00 Vendor: 14332 - KLICK, FLETCHER 60.00JUNE UMPIRE-2 SOFTBALL G…2022916 - 3527509/21/2022198051 101-4107-635100 Rec Sports / Services Contract…09/21/2022 Vendor 14332 - KLICK, FLETCHER Total:60.00 Vendor: 11586 - NEW BRIGHTON, CITY OF 127.16INDOOR VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE …202297 - 3500009/14/2022197996 101-4107-621130 Rec Sports / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 11586 - NEW BRIGHTON, CITY OF Total:127.16 128 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 10 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 12057 - SPORTS UNLIMITED 1,352.00ROCKS CLASS INSTRUCTION-L…202299 - 3510109/14/2022198005 101-4106-635100 Rec ROCKS / Services Contract…09/14/2022 Vendor 12057 - SPORTS UNLIMITED Total:1,352.00 Division 410 - Recreation Total:6,400.31 Division: 511 - Building Inspection Vendor: 14371 - REDEMPTION ELECTRIC LLC 328.00PERMIT REFUND2022913 - 3517109/19/2022198028 101-5110-435200 Bldg Inspection / Electrical Pe…09/19/2022 Vendor 14371 - REDEMPTION ELECTRIC LLC Total:328.00 Division 511 - Building Inspection Total:328.00 Division: 512 - Planning-Code Enforcement Vendor: 11907 - ROCK SOLID LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -TEMPO TE…1360509/14/2022198003 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -LYRIC LN1360609/14/2022198003 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -VAN BUR…1360709/14/2022198003 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -2ND ST1360809/14/2022198003 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -UNIVERSIT…1360909/14/2022198003 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -UNIVERSIT…1361009/14/2022198003 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -RAINBOW…1361309/14/2022198003 101-5120-631100 Planning / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -JACKSON …1362609/14/2022198003 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/14/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -UNIVERSIT…1363109/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 80.00YARD ABATEMENT HWY 651363209/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT 53RD AVE1363309/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT -UNIVERSIT…1363409/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT EAST RIVER…1363509/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT 46TH AVE1363609/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT 63RD WAY1363709/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 80.00YARD ABATEMENT MADISON …1363809/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 100.00YARD ABATEMENT MAIN ST1363909/20/2022198040 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contracted,…09/20/2022 Vendor 11907 - ROCK SOLID LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION Total:1,660.00 Division 512 - Planning-Code Enforcement Total:1,660.00 Division: 514 - Rental Inspections Vendor: 14375 - HOME SFR BORROWER LLC 100.00REFUND RENTAL LICENSE-63R…2022916 - 3511809/19/2022198024 101-5140-431200 Rental Inspection / Rental Lice…09/19/2022 Vendor 14375 - HOME SFR BORROWER LLC Total:100.00 Vendor: 14374 - MENSOH, ISAAC 100.00REFUND RENTAL LICENSE-6051…2022916 - 3517209/19/2022198025 101-5140-431200 Rental Inspection / Rental Lice…09/19/2022 Vendor 14374 - MENSOH, ISAAC Total:100.00 129 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 11 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 14102 - ZASADA, SUSAN 69.95WORK SHOES FOR SUSAN2022823 - 3473309/14/2022198016 101-5140-621110 Rental Inspection / Clothing & …09/14/2022 Vendor 14102 - ZASADA, SUSAN Total:69.95 Division 514 - Rental Inspections Total:269.95 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:546,196.12 Fund: 225 - Cable TV Fund Division: 127 - Communications & Engagement Vendor: 10447 - COMCAST CABLE 319.96CABLE FEES-8772 10 789 0044…4545 09/2209/14/2022197969 225-1270-633120 Comm & Engage / Communicat…09/14/2022 Vendor 10447 - COMCAST CABLE Total:319.96 Vendor: 14028 - NINE NORTH / NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORP 240.00COUNCIL MTG COVERAGE 7/1…2022-13509/14/2022197997 225-1270-631100 Comm & Engage / Services-Pro…09/14/2022 Vendor 14028 - NINE NORTH / NORTH SUBURBAN ACCESS CORP Total:240.00 Division 127 - Communications & Engagement Total:559.96 Fund 225 - Cable TV Fund Total:559.96 Fund: 237 - Solid Waste Abatement Division: 518 - Recycling Vendor: 11877 - REPUBLIC SERVICES #899 28,085.07AUG RECYCLING0899-00400003409/14/2022198001 237-5180-635100 Recycling / Services Contracted…09/14/2022 Vendor 11877 - REPUBLIC SERVICES #899 Total:28,085.07 Division 518 - Recycling Total:28,085.07 Fund 237 - Solid Waste Abatement Total:28,085.07 Fund: 270 - Springbrook NC Fund Division: 419 - Spring Brook Nature Center Vendor: 10284 - BOB'S PRODUCE RANCH 22.34BEEF SUET4851409/20/2022198035 270-4190-621130 SNC / Operating Supplies 09/20/2022 Vendor 10284 - BOB'S PRODUCE RANCH Total:22.34 Vendor: 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO 18.21UTILITIES 5530290-50290-5 09/2209/14/2022197965 270-4190-634100 SNC / Utility Services 09/14/2022 Vendor 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO Total:18.21 Vendor: 13553 - CINTAS CORPORATION 67.22MEDICINE CABINET SUPPLIES512412445009/20/2022198038 270-4190-621130 SNC / Operating Supplies 09/20/2022 Vendor 13553 - CINTAS CORPORATION Total:67.22 Division 419 - Spring Brook Nature Center Total:107.77 Fund 270 - Springbrook NC Fund Total:107.77 130 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 12 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Fund: 406 - Capital Improvements-STR Division: 318 - Streets Vendor: 13794 - C&L EXCAVATING INC 15,000.002020 STREET REHAB-FINAL PAY…PAY EST NO.6 FINAL09/20/2022198036 406-3180-705100 CIP Streets / Infrastructure 09/20/2022 Vendor 13794 - C&L EXCAVATING INC Total:15,000.00 Vendor: 14209 - HENNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 621.0053RD AVE ROUNDABOUT134-0609/14/2022197979 406-3180-705100 CIP Streets / Infrastructure 09/14/2022 Vendor 14209 - HENNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total:621.00 Division 318 - Streets Total:15,621.00 Fund 406 - Capital Improvements-STR Total:15,621.00 Fund: 407 - Capital Improvements-PKS Division: 316 - Parks Vendor: 13207 - VTI SECURITY / VIDEO TRONIX INC 10,583.00SECURITY UPGRADES AT SPRI…17054009/21/2022198061 407-3160-635100 CIP Parks / Services Contracted…09/21/2022 5,303.00SECURITY UPGRADES-SNC17054109/21/2022198061 407-3160-635100 CIP Parks / Services Contracted…09/21/2022 Vendor 13207 - VTI SECURITY / VIDEO TRONIX INC Total:15,886.00 Division 316 - Parks Total:15,886.00 Fund 407 - Capital Improvements-PKS Total:15,886.00 Fund: 409 - Capital Improvements-INFO TECH Division: 133 - Information Technology Vendor: 12768 - KELTEK INC 3,346.89PANASONIC FZ-55 HARDENED-…673009/14/2022197985 409-1330-621130 IT Capital / Operating Supplies 09/14/2022 Vendor 12768 - KELTEK INC Total:3,346.89 Division 133 - Information Technology Total:3,346.89 Fund 409 - Capital Improvements-INFO TECH Total:3,346.89 Fund: 410 - Capital Equipment Fund Division: 211 - Police Vendor: 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 1,038.67LEASE-VEH 313 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-2110-635110 CapEq. Police / Lease 09/14/2022 1,327.38LEASE-VEH 314 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-2110-635110 CapEq. Police / Lease 09/14/2022 1,321.15LEASE-VEH 315 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-2110-635110 CapEq. Police / Lease 09/14/2022 Vendor 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total:3,687.20 Division 211 - Police Total:3,687.20 Division: 219 - Fire Vendor: 11283 - MAC QUEEN EMERGENCY 525.85SCBA MASKSP0328109/14/2022197990 410-2190-621150 CapEq. Fire / Minor Equipment 09/14/2022 Vendor 11283 - MAC QUEEN EMERGENCY Total:525.85 Division 219 - Fire Total:525.85 131 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 13 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Division: 316 - Parks Vendor: 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 550.88LEASE-VEH 546 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-3160-635110 CapEq. Parks / Lease 09/14/2022 553.71LEASE-VEH 544 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-3160-635110 CapEq. Parks / Lease 09/14/2022 Vendor 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total:1,104.59 Division 316 - Parks Total:1,104.59 Division: 318 - Streets Vendor: 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 526.86LEASE-VEH 724 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-3180-635110 CapEq. Streets / Lease 09/14/2022 Vendor 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total:526.86 Division 318 - Streets Total:526.86 Division: 512 - Planning-Code Enforcement Vendor: 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 530.00LEASE-VEH 104 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-5120-635110 CapEq. Planning / Lease 09/14/2022 Vendor 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total:530.00 Division 512 - Planning-Code Enforcement Total:530.00 Division: 514 - Rental Inspections Vendor: 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 750.61LEASE-VEH 112 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 410-5140-635110 CapEq. Rental Inspect / Lease 09/14/2022 Vendor 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total:750.61 Division 514 - Rental Inspections Total:750.61 Fund 410 - Capital Equipment Fund Total:7,125.11 Fund: 601 - Water Fund Division: 601 - Water Vendor: 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 37.61UNIFORMS - WATER629004373309/14/2022197959 601-6012-621110 Water Ops / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 39.24UNIFORMS - WATER629004622909/21/2022198041 601-6012-621110 Water Ops / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 Vendor 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Total:76.85 Vendor: 10193 - AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO INC 345.25REPAIR TO RECLAIM TANK-C…37808 S09/14/2022197961 601-6012-635100 Water Ops / Services Contract…09/14/2022 Vendor 10193 - AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO INC Total:345.25 Vendor: 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO 254.20UTILITIES 10942843-32843-3 09/2209/19/2022198020 601-6012-634100 Water Ops / Utility Services 09/19/2022 16.80UTILITIES 5513440-73440-7 09/2209/19/2022198020 601-6012-634100 Water Ops / Utility Services 09/19/2022 Vendor 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO Total:271.00 Vendor: 10390 - CENTRAL TURF & IRRIGATION SUPPLY 49.40IRRIGATION PARTS6081375-0009/14/2022197967 601-6012-621140 Water Ops / Supplies for Repai…09/14/2022 19.98IRRIGATION PARTS-COMMONS…6081444-0009/20/2022198037 601-6012-621140 Water Ops / Supplies for Repai…09/20/2022 Vendor 10390 - CENTRAL TURF & IRRIGATION SUPPLY Total:69.38 132 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 14 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 10395 - CENTURY LINK 253.48PHONE SERVICE 612 Z010548 …0548 412 09/2209/14/2022197968 601-6012-633120 Water Ops / Communication (…09/14/2022 Vendor 10395 - CENTURY LINK Total:253.48 Vendor: 10449 - COMMERCIAL ASPHALT 322.71ASPHALT - WATER DEPT22091509/21/2022198043 601-6012-621140 Water Ops / Supplies for Repai…09/21/2022 Vendor 10449 - COMMERCIAL ASPHALT Total:322.71 Vendor: 13095 - CORE & MAIN LP 824.58DUCTILE PIPING-WTP 3R13226509/14/2022197970 601-6012-621140 Water Ops / Supplies for Repai…09/14/2022 7,109.55HYDRANT AND GATE VALVER42234509/14/2022197970 601-6012-621140 Water Ops / Supplies for Repai…09/14/2022 Vendor 13095 - CORE & MAIN LP Total:7,934.13 Vendor: 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 550.88LEASE-VEH 603 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 601-6019-635110 Water CIP / Lease 09/14/2022 Vendor 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total:550.88 Vendor: 10811 - GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 193.73AUG BILLABLE LOCATES208040709/14/2022197977 601-6012-635100 Water Ops / Services Contract…09/14/2022 Vendor 10811 - GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC Total:193.73 Vendor: 10894 - HAWKINS INC 1,708.80WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES628202109/21/2022198049 601-6012-621130 Water Ops / Operating Supplies 09/21/2022 2,789.95WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES628657709/21/2022198049 601-6012-621130 Water Ops / Operating Supplies 09/21/2022 Vendor 10894 - HAWKINS INC Total:4,498.75 Vendor: 10996 - INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INC 330.00AUG WATER TESTING437009/14/2022197982 601-6012-635100 Water Ops / Services Contract…09/14/2022 Vendor 10996 - INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INC Total:330.00 Vendor: 12618 - RESPEC 419.96AUG GIS-MAPPINGINV-0822-146309/21/2022198058 601-6012-635130 Water Ops / Hardware & Soft…09/21/2022 Vendor 12618 - RESPEC Total:419.96 Vendor: 13436 - REVSPRING INC 541.02UB WEBSITE-AUGINV131568909/14/2022198002 601-6010-633120 Water Admin / Communication…09/14/2022 1,214.50UB STATEMENT-AUGINV131568909/14/2022198002 601-6010-633120 Water Admin / Communication…09/14/2022 Vendor 13436 - REVSPRING INC Total:1,755.52 Division 601 - Water Total:17,021.64 Fund 601 - Water Fund Total:17,021.64 Fund: 602 - Sewer Fund Vendor: 11369 - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (SAC CHARGES) 7,455.00SAC CHARGES-AUGAUG 202209/19/2022198026 602-232310 Due to-Govts/Sewer (SAC)09/19/2022 -74.55DISCOUNTAUG 2022D09/19/2022198026 602-232310 Due to-Govts/Sewer (SAC)09/19/2022 Vendor 11369 - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (SAC CHARGES) Total:7,380.45 7,380.45 133 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 15 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Division: 602 - Sewer Vendor: 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 43.13UNIFORMS - SEWER629004373509/14/2022197959 602-6022-621110 Sewer Ops / Clothing & Laundry 09/14/2022 43.13UNIFORMS - SEWER629004623609/21/2022198041 602-6022-621110 Sewer Ops / Clothing & Laundry 09/21/2022 Vendor 10165 - ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Total:86.26 Vendor: 12852 - ASPENSON, JAKE 147.95SAFETY BOOTS REIMB-JAKE AS…2022913 - 3514609/20/2022198033 602-6022-621110 Sewer Ops / Clothing & Laundry 09/20/2022 Vendor 12852 - ASPENSON, JAKE Total:147.95 Vendor: 10222 - BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO 10.00DISPOSAL FEE22091509/21/2022198042 602-6022-635100 Sewer Ops / Services Contract…09/21/2022 Vendor 10222 - BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO Total:10.00 Vendor: 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO 21.01UTILITIES 11430265-60265-6 09/2209/19/2022198020 602-6022-634100 Sewer Ops / Utility Services 09/19/2022 19.51UTILITIES 11603414-13414-1 09/2209/19/2022198020 602-6022-634100 Sewer Ops / Utility Services 09/19/2022 Vendor 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO Total:40.52 Vendor: 10395 - CENTURY LINK 60.09PHONE SERVICE 763 571-1683…1683 087 08/2209/14/2022197968 602-6022-633120 Sewer Ops / Communication (…09/14/2022 Vendor 10395 - CENTURY LINK Total:60.09 Vendor: 10573 - DIESEL & IMPORT AUTO/TRUCK SERV INC 711.21SUBLET-PUMP FOR VEHICLE 6…2630009/21/2022198044 602-6022-635100 Sewer Ops / Services Contract…09/21/2022 Vendor 10573 - DIESEL & IMPORT AUTO/TRUCK SERV INC Total:711.21 Vendor: 13306 - ELECTRIC PUMP INC 5,282.00REPAIR/REPLACE GATE AND C…0074308-IN09/21/2022198045 602-6029-635100 Sewer CIP / Services Contracte…09/21/2022 Vendor 13306 - ELECTRIC PUMP INC Total:5,282.00 Vendor: 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 550.88LEASE-VEH 673 AUGUSTFB455476709/14/2022197973 602-6029-635110 Sewer CIP / Lease 09/14/2022 Vendor 13969 - ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Total:550.88 Vendor: 10718 - FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO 4,000.00SANITARY SEWER TOOLS2798209/14/2022197975 602-6022-621150 Sewer Ops / Tools & Minor Equ…09/14/2022 22.50WHEEL NUTS2798709/14/2022197975 602-6022-621140 Sewer Ops / Supplies for Repai…09/14/2022 Vendor 10718 - FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO Total:4,022.50 Vendor: 10811 - GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 193.72AUG BILLABLE LOCATES208040709/14/2022197977 602-6022-635100 Sewer Ops / Services Contract…09/14/2022 Vendor 10811 - GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC Total:193.72 Vendor: 11346 - MENARDS - FRIDLEY 55.48BATTERIES7279509/14/2022197993 602-6022-621140 Sewer Ops / Supplies for Repai…09/14/2022 Vendor 11346 - MENARDS - FRIDLEY Total:55.48 Vendor: 11368 - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 400,495.63OCT WASTEWATER000114512809/14/2022197994 602-6022-634100 Sewer Ops / Utility Services 09/14/2022 Vendor 11368 - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Total:400,495.63 134 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 16 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 12618 - RESPEC 419.96AUG GIS-MAPPINGINV-0822-146309/21/2022198058 602-6022-635130 Sewer Ops / Hardware & Soft…09/21/2022 Vendor 12618 - RESPEC Total:419.96 Vendor: 13436 - REVSPRING INC 598.19UB STATEMENT-AUGINV131568909/14/2022198002 602-6020-633120 Sewer Admin / Communication…09/14/2022 266.47UB WEBSITE-AUGINV131568909/14/2022198002 602-6020-633120 Sewer Admin / Communication…09/14/2022 Vendor 13436 - REVSPRING INC Total:864.66 Division 602 - Sewer Total:412,940.86 Fund 602 - Sewer Fund Total:420,321.31 Fund: 603 - Storm Water Fund Division: 603 - Storm Vendor: 10718 - FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO 9,625.00STORM WATER TOOLS2798209/14/2022197975 603-6032-621150 Storm Ops / Tools & Minor Equ…09/14/2022 Vendor 10718 - FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO Total:9,625.00 Vendor: 11344 - MENARDS - BLAINE 134.80SILT SOCKS3888209/14/2022197992 603-6032-621140 Storm Ops / Supplies for Repair…09/14/2022 Vendor 11344 - MENARDS - BLAINE Total:134.80 Vendor: 12618 - RESPEC 420.08AUG GIS-MAPPINGINV-0822-146309/21/2022198058 603-6032-635130 Storm Ops / Hardware & Soft…09/21/2022 Vendor 12618 - RESPEC Total:420.08 Division 603 - Storm Total:10,179.88 Fund 603 - Storm Water Fund Total:10,179.88 Fund: 609 - Municipal Liquor Division: 691 - Store 1 - Cub location Vendor: 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO 26.65UTILITIES 9791717-31717-3 09/2209/14/2022197965 609-6910-634100 Liq Store 1 / Utility Services 09/14/2022 Vendor 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO Total:26.65 Vendor: 12402 - XCEL ENERGY 2,327.78UTILITIES 51-0838492-979488611409/14/2022198015 609-6910-634100 Liq Store 1 / Utility Services 09/14/2022 Vendor 12402 - XCEL ENERGY Total:2,327.78 Division 691 - Store 1 - Cub location Total:2,354.43 Division: 692 - Store 2 - Hwy 65 location Vendor: 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO 25.20UTILITIES 5582808-12808-1 09/2209/14/2022197965 609-6920-634100 Liq Store 2 / Utility Services 09/14/2022 Vendor 10383 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY-MINNEGASCO Total:25.20 Vendor: 10388 - CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY 305.00REPAIR LEAK AROUND BOOT-L…3153009/14/2022197966 609-6920-635100 Liq Store 2 / Services Contract…09/14/2022 Vendor 10388 - CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY Total:305.00 135 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 17 of 21 AmountAccount Name Post DateDescription (Item)Payable NumberPayment DatePayment Number Account Number Vendor: 12402 - XCEL ENERGY 1,610.73UTILITIES 51-5583129-379493458909/14/2022198015 609-6920-634100 Liq Store 2 / Utility Services 09/14/2022 Vendor 12402 - XCEL ENERGY Total:1,610.73 Division 692 - Store 2 - Hwy 65 location Total:1,940.93 Fund 609 - Municipal Liquor Total:4,295.36 Fund: 703 - Employee Benefits Vendor: 12443 - OPTUM BANK (HSA) 4,075.22HSA SAVINGS ACCT - EMPLOY…INV002717009/16/2022DFT0004067 703-213340 Health Care Spending 09/16/2022 Vendor 12443 - OPTUM BANK (HSA) Total:4,075.22 4,075.22 Fund 703 - Employee Benefits Total:4,075.22 Fund: 704 - Self Insurance Fund Division: 713 - Self Insurance Vendor: 13268 - 121 BENEFITS 711.50AUG 2022 FSA, HRA/VEBA, CO…70601509/14/2022197955 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 Vendor 13268 - 121 BENEFITS Total:711.50 Vendor: 11205 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 1,577.62PW-PARKS WORK COMP CLAIM1890909/14/2022197988 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 1,576.54PUBLIC SAFETY/POLICE-WORK…19011/1901809/14/2022197988 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 246.11FIN-WATER ADMIN-WORK C…19011/1901809/14/2022197988 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 16,820.99PW-GARAGE WORKER COMP …19183/19193/1920409/14/2022197988 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 348.73PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE WORK…19183/19193/1920409/14/2022197988 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 255.78PW-PARKS WORKER COMP CL…19183/19193/1920409/14/2022197988 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 6,548.19PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE WORK…1924609/14/2022197988 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professional 09/14/2022 46,364.003RD QTR LIABILITY INSURANCE3RD QTR 202209/14/2022197987 704-7130-631130 Self Ins / Insurance Policies 09/14/2022 Vendor 11205 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Total:73,737.96 Division 713 - Self Insurance Total:74,449.46 Fund 704 - Self Insurance Fund Total:74,449.46 Grand Total:1,147,270.79 136 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 18 of 21 Report Summary Fund Summary Payment AmountFund 101 - General Fund 546,196.12 225 - Cable TV Fund 559.96 237 - Solid Waste Abatement 28,085.07 270 - Springbrook NC Fund 107.77 406 - Capital Improvements-STR 15,621.00 407 - Capital Improvements-PKS 15,886.00 409 - Capital Improvements-INFO TECH 3,346.89 410 - Capital Equipment Fund 7,125.11 601 - Water Fund 17,021.64 602 - Sewer Fund 420,321.31 603 - Storm Water Fund 10,179.88 609 - Municipal Liquor 4,295.36 703 - Employee Benefits 4,075.22 704 - Self Insurance Fund 74,449.46 1,147,270.79Grand Total: Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 101-1110-635100 City Council / Services Con…462.00 101-1270-631100 Comm & Engage / Service…1,400.00 101-1270-633110 Comm & Engage / Printing…4,659.13 101-1270-633120 Comm & Engage / Comm…841.61 101-1280-621120 City Clerk / Office Supplies 27.90 101-1310-632100 Accounting / Dues & Subs…120.00 101-132200 Due from HRA 1,342.08 101-1330-621130 IT / Operating Supplies 243.75 101-1330-633120 IT / Communication (pho…4,117.68 101-1330-635100 IT / Services Contracted, …56.45 101-141010 Inventory - Fuel 14,136.16 101-141040 Inventory - Auto Parts & S…1,448.21 101-203130 Surtax/Surcharge 2,650.56 101-2110-621130 Police / Operating Supplies 276.08 101-2110-621150 Police / Tools & Minor Equ…221.76 101-2110-631100 Police / Services-Professi…1,942.00 101-2110-632120 Police / Conferences & Sc…695.00 101-2110-633120 Police / Communication (…1,952.05 101-2110-635100 Police / Services Contract…145.35 101-212100 Federal Tax Withheld 48,738.16 101-212110 State Tax Withheld 22,237.55 101-212120 FICA Payable 42,281.48 137 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 19 of 21 Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 101-212130 Medicare Payable 15,316.84 101-213100 PERA 96,348.48 101-213150 Health Reimb HRA/Veba &…3,960.66 101-213170 Life Insurance Payable 2,558.02 101-213200 Long Term Disability With…3,195.03 101-213205 Short Term Disability 3,807.49 101-213230 Union Dues - FT Fire 60.00 101-213260 Deferred Comp.-ICMA 457…24,081.82 101-213270 ICMA Roth IRA 4,335.12 101-213280 RHS Plan (ICMA)3,277.88 101-213290 Union Dues - POC/Vol Fire 650.00 101-213300 Child Support Withheld 842.63 101-213330 Fridley Police Association 196.00 101-2150-633120 Emergency Mgmt / Com…41.51 101-2190-621110 Fire / Clothing & Laundry 1,701.60 101-2190-621130 Fire / Operating Supplies 516.97 101-2190-621150 Fire / Tools & Minor Equi…454.91 101-2190-631100 Fire / Services-Professional 782.00 101-2190-632120 Fire / Conferences & Scho…531.98 101-2190-633120 Fire / Communication (ph…356.88 101-221100 Deposits 100.00 101-3110-621110 Facilities / Clothing & Lau…231.90 101-3110-634100 Facilities / Utility Services 14,318.36 101-3110-635100 Facilities / Services Contra…1,652.50 101-3150-621140 Forestry / Supplies for Re…403.88 101-3150-635100 Forestry / Services Contra…17,350.00 101-3160-621110 Parks / Clothing & Laundry 135.54 101-3160-621140 Parks / Supplies for Repair…2,323.26 101-3160-621150 Parks / Tools & Minor Equ…13.79 101-3160-634100 Parks / Utility Services 37.05 101-3160-635110 Parks / Rentals 236.00 101-3170-634100 Lighting / Utility Services 104.37 101-3180-621110 Streets / Clothing & Laund…305.01 101-3180-621140 Streets / Supplies for Repa…7,027.54 101-3180-621150 Streets / Tools & Minor E…530.60 101-3180-635100 Streets / Services Contrac…179,230.20 101-3190-621110 Fleet Services / Clothing &…153.22 101-3190-633120 Fleet Services / Communi…373.86 101-4100-621130 Rec / Operating Supplies 98.54 101-4100-631100 Rec / Services-Professional 1,200.00 101-4100-633110 Rec / Printing & Binding 2,721.00 101-4100-633120 Rec / Communication (ph…841.61 138 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 20 of 21 Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 101-4106-635100 Rec ROCKS / Services Cont…1,352.00 101-4107-621130 Rec Sports / Operating Su…127.16 101-4107-635100 Rec Sports / Services Cont…60.00 101-5110-435200 Bldg Inspection / Electrical…328.00 101-5120-631100 Planning / Services-Profes…100.00 101-5120-635100 Planning / Services Contra…1,560.00 101-5140-431200 Rental Inspection / Rental…200.00 101-5140-621110 Rental Inspection / Clothi…69.95 225-1270-631100 Comm & Engage / Service…240.00 225-1270-633120 Comm & Engage / Comm…319.96 237-5180-635100 Recycling / Services Contr…28,085.07 270-4190-621130 SNC / Operating Supplies 89.56 270-4190-634100 SNC / Utility Services 18.21 406-3180-705100 CIP Streets / Infrastructure 15,621.00 407-3160-635100 CIP Parks / Services Contr…15,886.00 409-1330-621130 IT Capital / Operating Sup…3,346.89 410-2110-635110 CapEq. Police / Lease 3,687.20 410-2190-621150 CapEq. Fire / Minor Equi…525.85 410-3160-635110 CapEq. Parks / Lease 1,104.59 410-3180-635110 CapEq. Streets / Lease 526.86 410-5120-635110 CapEq. Planning / Lease 530.00 410-5140-635110 CapEq. Rental Inspect / Le…750.61 601-6010-633120 Water Admin / Communi…1,755.52 601-6012-621110 Water Ops / Clothing & L…76.85 601-6012-621130 Water Ops / Operating Su…4,498.75 601-6012-621140 Water Ops / Supplies for …8,326.22 601-6012-633120 Water Ops / Communicat…253.48 601-6012-634100 Water Ops / Utility Servic…271.00 601-6012-635100 Water Ops / Services Cont…868.98 601-6012-635130 Water Ops / Hardware & …419.96 601-6019-635110 Water CIP / Lease 550.88 602-232310 Due to-Govts/Sewer (SAC)7,380.45 602-6020-633120 Sewer Admin / Communic…864.66 602-6022-621110 Sewer Ops / Clothing & L…234.21 602-6022-621140 Sewer Ops / Supplies for …77.98 602-6022-621150 Sewer Ops / Tools & Mino…4,000.00 602-6022-633120 Sewer Ops / Communicat…60.09 602-6022-634100 Sewer Ops / Utility Servic…400,536.15 602-6022-635100 Sewer Ops / Services Cont…914.93 602-6022-635130 Sewer Ops / Hardware & …419.96 602-6029-635100 Sewer CIP / Services Cont…5,282.00 602-6029-635110 Sewer CIP / Lease 550.88 139 Item 9. Council Claims Report Payment Dates: 9/9/2022 - 9/21/2022 9/21/2022 11:38:00 AM Page 21 of 21 Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 603-6032-621140 Storm Ops / Supplies for …134.80 603-6032-621150 Storm Ops / Tools & Mino…9,625.00 603-6032-635130 Storm Ops / Hardware & …420.08 609-6910-634100 Liq Store 1 / Utility Servic…2,354.43 609-6920-634100 Liq Store 2 / Utility Servic…1,635.93 609-6920-635100 Liq Store 2 / Services Cont…305.00 703-213340 Health Care Spending 4,075.22 704-7130-631100 Self Ins / Services-Professi…28,085.46 704-7130-631130 Self Ins / Insurance Policies 46,364.00 Grand Total:1,147,270.79 Project Account Summary Payment AmountProject Account Key 1,098,213.03**None** 695.00211003 15,000.004063120001 621.004063121521 15,886.004073122900 3,346.894091322307 3,687.204102122110 525.854102122903 1,104.594103122610 526.864103122811 530.004105122210 750.614105122410 550.886016022611 5,282.006026022519 550.886026022612 Grand Total:1,147,270.79 140 Item 9. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Joe Starks, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Paul Bolin, Assistant Executive Director, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Title Resolution No. 2022-104, Consenting to the Property Tax Levy for 2022, Collectible in 2023, for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley Background Since 1996, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley (HRA) has levied a property tax to support its activities, specifically various housing rehabilitation programs. Per Minnesota Statutes § 469.033, the property tax levy for the HRA may not exceed 0.0185% of the estimated market value of all real estate and personal property under its jurisdiction. Historically, the HRA levied the statutory maximum. For property tax payable in 2023, the HRA proposed the same approach. Based on the estimated market value of $3,424,708,700, the HRA would levy approximately $633,571 for 2023, an increase of about $34,000 compared to 2022. The HRA Board of Commissioners approved the property tax levy at their September 1, 2022, meeting. Per the abovementioned statute, the City Council (Council) must also consent to the property tax levy as requested. Assuming the Council approves the property tax levy, staff will certify and submit the attached resolution to Anoka County on or before September 30, 2022. Financial Impact Based on the proposed property tax levy, staff estimate the property taxes payable in 2023 to be about $53 for a home with a median assessed value of $288,300 and $185 for a commercial property assessed at $1,000,000. Recommendation Staff recommend the approval of Resolution No. 2022-104. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building X Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship X Organizational Excellence 141 Item 10. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-104 142 Item 10. Resolution No. 2022-104 Consenting to the Property Tax Levy for 2022, Collectible in 2023, for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley Be It Resolved, by the City Council (Council) of the City of Fridley (City): Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota (Authority) at its regular meeting on September 1, 2022 adopted Resolution No. 2022-05: Adopting a 2022 Tax Levy Collectible in 2023 (Resolution). 1.02. The Council must consent to any Authority levy prior to it becoming effective as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 469.033. Section 2. Consent. 2.01. The Council hereby consents to the Authority Resolution and to the final levy of $633,571 to be levied in 2022 for collection in 2023, as described therein. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day of September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor Attest: Melissa Moore – City Clerk 143 Item 10. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Joe Starks, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Title Resolution No. 2022-105, Approving the Proposed Property Tax Levy for 2022, Collectible in 2023, for the City of Fridley Background Per Minnesota Statutes § 275.065, all home rule and statutory cities must certify a Proposed Property Tax Levy (Proposed Levy) to their respective county auditor on or before September 30 of each year. For the City of Fridley (City), the Proposed Levy supports four separate budget areas: 1) General Fund (GF); 2) Information Technology (IT) Capital Equipment Fund; 3) Springbrook Nature Center (SNC) Fund; and 4) Debt Service (DS). Generally, the Final Property Tax Levy (Final Levy), typically certified in December, cannot exceed the Proposed Levy. On May 9, August 22 and September 12, 2022, the City Council (Council) reviewed the Proposed 2023 Budget, which included a review of anticipated revenues and expenditures, discussion about budget assumptions and impact of the General Obligation (GO) Tax Abatement Bonds for the Park System Improvement Plan (PSIP), which must be levied for beginning with this year’s levy, to be collected in 2023. Given those discussions, staff recommend a 12.82% increase in the overall Proposed Levy. Figure No. 1 outlines the changes in the Proposed Levy. 144 Item 11. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. Since the proposed changes for the IT Capital Projects and SNC Funds both exceed 5.0% compared to the previous year, staff recommend the Council adopt the attached resolution with “an affirmative vote of at least four members of the Council” to ensure compliance with Charter § 7.02.1. Assuming approval of the Proposed Levy, staff anticipate the Council to hold a public hearing on November 28, 2022, at 7:00pm in the Council Chambers at Fridley Civic Campus, to receive comments on the same. On December 12, 2022, staff also anticipate the Council to adopt the various components of the budget, including the Final Levy. Financial Impact Staff estimate that City property taxes for a residential homestead, with a median assessed value of $288,300 for 2023 (compared to approximately $247,200 for 2022), will increase by approximately $169, from about $1,051 for 2022 to approximately $1,220 for 2023. Of the projected $169 increase, $120 is related to the GO Tax Abatement Bonds for the PSIP and the remaining $49 related to the General Fund, IT Capital Fund, Springbrook Nature Center Fund and Other Debt Service levies. These projections are based on property tax estimates and may be subject to change upon the release of audited property tax information by Anoka County. Recommendation Staff recommend the approval of Resolution No. 2022-105 Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building X Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship X Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-105 145 Item 11. Resolution No. 2022-105 Approving the Proposed 2023 Property Tax Levy for 2022, Collectible in 2023, for the City of Fridley Whereas, the Fridley City Charter (Charter) of the City of Fridley (City) grants broad powers to the City to raise money by taxation pursuant to the laws of the State of Minnesota; and Whereas, the Charter also establishes both the budget preparation process and the responsibilities of the City Council and City Manager for these activities; and Whereas, Minnesota Statutes § 275.065 requires the City to certify its proposed property tax levy requirements to the Anoka County on or before September 30; and Whereas, the City Council will hold a public hearing on November 28, 2022, at 7:00pm in the Council Chambers at Fridley Civic Campus, to receive comments regarding the proposed property tax levy for 2022, collectible in 2023. Now, therefore be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby certifies to the County of Anoka, Minnesota, the following proposed property tax to be levied in 2022 for collection in 2023: Proposed 2023 Property Tax Levy Levy Component Amount General Fund $ 13,844,706 Information Technology Capital Projects Fund 73,955 Springbrook Nature Center Fund 498,343 Bonded Indebtedness 5,203,866 Total $ 19,620,870 Be it further resolved, that the City Council authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County of Anoka, Minnesota. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day of September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor ATTEST: Melissa M. Moore – City Clerk 146 Item 11. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: September 26, 2022 Meeting Type: City Council Submitted By: Joe Starks, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Title Resolution No. 2022-106, Approving the Proposed 2023 General Fund Budget for the City of Fridley Background Per Minnesota Statute § 275.065, and consistent with guidance from the League of Minnesota Cities, all home rule and statutory cities must adopt a proposed general fund budget on or before September 30 of each year. Additionally, Fridley City Charter (Charter) § 7.05 guides staff to prepare and present a proposed budget at a regular meeting prior to the deadline established by Minnesota statutes. On May 9, August 22 and September 12, 2022, the City Council (Council) discussed the Proposed 2023 General Fund Budget (Proposed Budget), which included a review of anticipated revenues and expenditures among other items. Consistent with these discussions, staff revised the Proposed Budget to reflect Council guidance, while responding to various cost pressures, notably inflationary pressures, increases to health and worker’s compensation insurance premiums and increases to personnel services in coordination with applicable labor agreements. Assuming approval of the Proposed Budget, staff anticipate the Council to hold a public hearing on November 28, 2022, to receive comments on the same. Shortly thereafter, on December 12, 2022, staff also anticipate the Council to adopt the various components of the budget. In the interim, staff will continue to refine budget estimates and review the same with the Council, as needed. The Proposed 2023 General Fund Summary Budget and General Fund Department Summary Budgets are attached. Like prior years, due to its length, the extensive 2023 Proposed Budget Book will be posted on the city website under “City Financials.” The Council reviewed these documents at the meetings mentioned above. Financial Impact The Proposed Budget plans for up to $21,033,500 of expenditures supported by the same amount of revenues, an increase of about $1,399,600 or 7.1% compared to the previous fiscal year. Recommendation Staff recommend the approval of Resolution No. 2022-106. 147 Item 12. Vision Statement We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses. Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building X Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship X Organizational Excellence Attachments and Other Resources  Resolution No. 2022-106  Proposed 2023 General Fund Summary / General Fund Departmental Summary Budgets 148 Item 12. Resolution No. 2022-106 Approving the Proposed 2023 General Fund Budget for the City of Fridley Whereas, the Fridley City Charter (Charter) of the City of Fridley (City) grants broad powers to the City to prepare and adopt an annual budget for the general fund and other City activities; and Whereas, the Charter also establishes both the budget preparation process and the responsibilities of the City Council and City Manager for the same; and Whereas, the City Manager prepared such documents and presented them for review by the City Council on May 9, August 22 and September 12, 2022; and Whereas, the City Council will hold a public hearing on November 28, 2022 to receive comments before approving and adopting a final budget for 2023. Now, therefore be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves the following proposed budget for the 2023: Proposed 2023 General Fund Budget Revenues Expenditures Taxes $ 13,883,600 Legislative (City Council) $ 169,300 Special Assessments 53,300 City Management 1,779,000 Licenses and Permits 1,100,800 Finance 1,822,200 Intergovernmental 2,162,600 Non-departmental 23,700 Charges for Services 2,742,000 Public Safety 9,947,600 Fines and Forfeitures 133,400 Public Works 4,699,400 Miscellaneous 277,700 Parks & Recreation 890,700 Other Financing Sources 680,100 Community Development 1,701,600 Total $ 21,033,500 Total $ 21,033,500 Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this 26th day of September, 2022. _______________________________________ Scott J. Lund – Mayor ATTEST: Melissa M. Moore – City Clerk 149 Item 12. 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes 12,439,125$ 12,476,885$ 13,031,700$ 13,306,327$ 13,637,400$ 13,883,600$ 42 - Special Assessments 19,100 33,262 30,200 167,760 22,900 53,300 43 - Licenses and Permits 1,036,300 1,301,972 1,034,100 1,265,772 1,184,000 1,100,800 44 - Intergovernmental 1,762,200 2,049,123 1,805,100 2,019,750 2,050,000 2,162,600 45 - Charges for Services 2,149,300 2,074,088 2,122,800 2,300,204 2,228,700 2,742,000 46 - Fines and Forfeitures 167,500 116,334 161,400 130,986 159,600 133,400 47 - Miscellaneous 202,685 375,566 192,290 156,256 159,000 277,700 49 - Other Financing Sources 2,231,700 2,249,000 186,700 189,600 192,300 680,100 Total Revenues 20,007,910$ 20,676,231 18,564,290$ 19,536,655$ 19,633,900$ 21,033,500$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 13,840,400$ 13,365,967$ 14,343,890$ 14,039,587$ 15,320,800$ 16,332,000$ 62 - Supplies 862,650 750,320 822,020 769,717 825,600 858,500 63 - Other Services & Charges 3,259,860 3,128,580 3,398,380 3,374,444 3,487,500 3,843,000 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - 4,321,388 - - Total Expenditures 17,962,910$ 17,244,866 18,564,290$ 22,505,136$ 19,633,900$ 21,033,500$ Net Property Tax Supported 2,045,000$ 3,431,364 -$ (2,968,481)$ -$ -$ Fund Balance 12,307,461$ 13,693,825$ 13,693,825$ 10,725,339$ 10,725,339$ 10,725,339$ General Fund Summary 150 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Legislative (11) Division: City Council (10) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 105,400$ 92,239$ 95,500$ 91,094$ 89,300$ 90,700$ 62 - Supplies 2,600 3,243 2,280 747 2,300 2,400 63 - Other Services & Charges 51,990 46,743 71,890 77,654 73,900 76,200 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 159,990$ 142,225$ 169,670$ 169,495$ 165,500$ 169,300$ Net Property Tax Supported (159,990)$ (142,225)$ (169,670)$ (169,495)$ (165,500)$ (169,300)$ 151 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: General Management (12) Division: City Management (10) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 323,350$ 315,153$ 332,400$ 347,585$ 353,900$ 371,500$ 62 - Supplies 3,370 1,923 5,320 3,661 5,300 5,300 63 - Other Services & Charges 30,500 25,773 16,670 17,916 17,800 14,600 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 357,220$ 342,849$ 354,390$ 369,162$ 377,000$ 391,400$ Net Property Tax Supported (357,220)$ (342,849)$ (354,390)$ (369,162)$ (377,000)$ (391,400)$ 152 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: General Management (12) Division: Legal (40) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures 166,800 113,434 160,700 126,049 155,900 129,700 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 166,800$ 113,434$ 160,700$ 126,049$ 155,900$ 129,700$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 62 - Supplies - - - - - - 63 - Other Services & Charges 405,600 374,672 398,250 384,926 406,600 406,600 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 405,600$ 374,672$ 398,250$ 384,926$ 406,600$ 406,600$ Net Property Tax Supported (238,800)$ (261,238)$ (237,550)$ (258,877)$ (250,700)$ (276,900)$ 153 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: General Management (12) Division: Employee Resources (60) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 371,900$ 361,915$ 370,700$ 352,829$ 334,900$ 348,100$ 62 - Supplies 3,800 507 3,590 680 3,600 3,600 63 - Other Services & Charges 49,950 15,764 52,970 36,287 58,300 60,200 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 425,650$ 378,186$ 427,260$ 389,796$ 396,800$ 411,900$ Net Property Tax Supported (425,650)$ (378,186)$ (427,260)$ (389,796)$ (396,800)$ (411,900)$ 154 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: General Management (12) Division: Communications and Engagement (70) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental 11,000 - 6,000 3,500 9,500 11,000 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 11,000$ -$ 6,000$ 3,500$ 9,500$ 11,000$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 97,300$ 98,842 102,300$ 120,322$ 196,600$ 141,100$ 62 - Supplies - - - 145 13,000 3,300 63 - Other Services & Charges 47,200 36,519 46,730 50,942 61,200 68,000 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 144,500$ 135,361$ 149,030$ 171,409$ 270,800$ 212,400$ Net Property Tax Supported (133,500)$ (135,361)$ (143,030)$ (167,909)$ (261,300)$ (201,400)$ 155 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: General Management (12) Division: City Clerk/Records (80) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits 104,400 93,678 103,400 117,937 107,200 115,300 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services 200 - 200 12 100 - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - 2,750 - 1,500 2,700 2,500 47 - Miscellaneous 52,000 30,645 39,390 78,489 35,000 60,000 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 156,600$ 127,073$ 142,990$ 197,938$ 145,000$ 177,800$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 100,450$ 101,648 105,300$ 118,031$ 139,600$ 229,500$ 62 - Supplies 1,300 73 980 576 1,000 1,000 63 - Other Services & Charges 6,600 11,133 6,270 4,501 8,600 21,600 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 108,350$ 112,854$ 112,550$ 123,108$ 149,200$ 252,100$ Net Property Tax Supported 48,250$ 14,219$ 30,440$ 74,830$ (4,200)$ (74,300)$ 156 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: General Management (12) Division: Elections (90) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - 14,193 - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - 20,458 - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ 34,651$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 83,500$ 67,714$ -$ -$ 65,000$ -$ 62 - Supplies 1,200 2,153 1,190 349 1,200 - 63 - Other Services & Charges 11,050 9,578 10,950 5,912 32,600 16,300 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 95,750$ 79,445$ 12,140$ 6,261$ 98,800$ 16,300$ Net Property Tax Supported (95,750)$ (44,794)$ (12,140)$ (6,261)$ (98,800)$ (16,300)$ Full-time Equivalents (FTEs)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 157 Item 12. Department: Non-Departmental (14) Division: Non-Departmental (10) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes 12,439,125$ 12,476,885$ 13,031,700$ 13,306,327$ 13,637,400$ 13,883,600$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental 794,700 794,700 744,700 774,700 662,300 698,400 45 - Charges for Services 1,132,800 1,132,800 1,156,700 1,185,442 1,239,800 1,353,100 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous 48,985 30,432 30,500 102,717 9,600 28,100 49 - Other Financing Sources 2,231,700 2,249,000 186,700 189,600 192,300 680,100 Total Revenues 16,647,310$ 16,683,817$ 15,150,300$ 15,558,786$ 15,741,400$ 16,643,300$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 35,000$ -$ 171,190$ -$ 412,000$ -$ 62 - Supplies - 704 - 492 - - 63 - Other Services & Charges 23,090 31,902 (92,730) 17,537 (98,000) 23,700 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - 4,321,388 - - Total Expenditures 58,090$ 32,606$ 78,460$ 4,339,417$ 314,000$ 23,700$ Net Property Tax Supported 16,589,220$ 16,651,211$ 15,071,840$ 11,219,369$ 15,427,400$ 16,619,600$ 158 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Non-Departmental (14) Division: Emergency Reserves (20) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 62 - Supplies - 83,856 - 645 - - 63 - Other Services & Charges 89,250 308,784 88,360 13,237 88,300 88,300 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 89,250$ 392,640$ 88,360$ 13,882$ 88,300$ 88,300$ Net Property Tax Supported (89,250)$ (392,640)$ (88,360)$ (13,882)$ (88,300)$ (88,300)$ 159 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Finance (13) Division: Accounting (10) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services 4,700 3,976 5,600 4,581 5,100 5,000 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous 74,500 300,084 100,200 (44,481) 101,300 176,100 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 79,200$ 304,060$ 105,800$ (39,900)$ 106,400$ 181,100$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 599,050$ 614,709$ 597,200$ 570,926$ 608,400$ 665,600$ 62 - Supplies 3,400 1,898 2,470 4,353 2,600 4,200 63 - Other Services & Charges 90,500 84,061 90,370 98,876 106,300 98,000 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 692,950$ 700,668$ 690,040$ 674,155$ 717,300$ 767,800$ Net Property Tax Supported (613,750)$ (396,608)$ (584,240)$ (714,055)$ (610,900)$ (586,700)$ 160 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Finance (13) Division: Assessing (20) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 235,200$ 234,093$ 268,000$ 256,127$ 275,900$ 289,100$ 62 - Supplies 2,500 2,013 2,490 1,863 2,500 2,200 63 - Other Services & Charges 15,180 3,723 13,190 14,400 13,300 15,800 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 252,880$ 239,829$ 283,680$ 272,390$ 291,700$ 307,100$ Net Property Tax Supported (252,880)$ (239,829)$ (283,680)$ (272,390)$ (291,700)$ (307,100)$ 161 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Finance (13) Division: Information Technology (30) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 342,900$ 341,714$ 354,000$ 330,871$ 367,800$ 420,000$ 62 - Supplies 4,150 6,685 5,150 4,693 5,100 5,200 63 - Other Services & Charges 238,500 213,747 265,430 245,585 274,200 322,100 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 585,550$ 562,146$ 624,580$ 581,149$ 647,100$ 747,300$ Net Property Tax Supported (585,550)$ (562,146)$ (624,580)$ (581,149)$ (647,100)$ (747,300)$ 162 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Safety (21) Division: Police (10,12) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental 410,000 589,466 547,000 602,413 751,600 786,600 45 - Charges for Services 352,500 328,713 337,900 438,510 271,200 519,600 46 - Fines and Forfeitures 700 150 700 3,437 1,000 1,200 47 - Miscellaneous 14,800 8,425 12,800 12,291 7,300 8,200 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 778,000$ 926,754$ 898,400$ 1,056,651$ 1,031,100$ 1,315,600$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 6,390,600$ 6,327,634$ 6,691,200$ 6,608,252$ 6,975,300$ 7,487,100$ 62 - Supplies 223,400 194,276 216,870 248,051 214,400 225,900 63 - Other Services & Charges 437,560 386,234 506,110 486,199 459,300 427,800 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 7,051,560$ 6,908,145$ 7,414,180$ 7,342,502$ 7,649,000$ 8,140,800$ Net Property Tax Supported (6,273,560)$ (5,981,391)$ (6,515,780)$ (6,285,851)$ (6,617,900)$ (6,825,200)$ 163 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Safety (21) Division: Emergency Management (50) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - 496 - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ 496$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 62 - Supplies 6,300 2,723 5,240 3,976 3,500 3,500 63 - Other Services & Charges 11,800 7,999 11,080 7,763 11,100 11,100 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 18,100$ 10,723$ 16,320$ 11,739$ 14,600$ 14,600$ Net Property Tax Supported (18,100)$ (10,723)$ (16,320)$ (11,243)$ (14,600)$ (14,600)$ 164 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Safety (21) Division: Fire (90) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits 31,500 32,233 31,500 29,034 31,500 20,000 44 - Intergovernmental 158,900 184,419 158,900 210,167 180,100 218,400 45 - Charges for Services 8,800 2,570 6,900 500 11,300 1,700 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous 1,300 50 1,300 500 900 - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 200,500$ 219,272$ 198,600$ 240,201$ 223,800$ 240,100$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 1,110,500$ 1,044,021$ 1,121,500$ 1,199,143$ 1,183,400$ 1,320,000$ 62 - Supplies 82,500 57,352 76,370 85,955 76,400 91,000 63 - Other Services & Charges 305,700 355,883 343,640 366,196 334,600 381,200 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,498,700$ 1,457,255$ 1,541,510$ 1,651,294$ 1,594,400$ 1,792,200$ Net Property Tax Supported (1,298,200)$ (1,237,983)$ (1,342,910)$ (1,411,093)$ (1,370,600)$ (1,552,100)$ 165 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Works (31) Division: Facilities Management (10) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 219,000$ 222,714$ 268,500$ 275,676$ 291,100$ 321,200$ 62 - Supplies 36,600 40,430 42,900 37,418 44,400 43,400 63 - Other Services & Charges 251,100 309,476 278,450 328,939 293,600 382,900 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 506,700$ 572,619$ 589,850$ 642,033$ 629,100$ 747,500$ Net Property Tax Supported (506,700)$ (572,619)$ (589,850)$ (642,033)$ (629,100)$ (747,500)$ 166 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Works (31) Division: Engineering (40) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits 32,200 10,455 32,200 17,316 24,900 31,000 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services 365,600 413,772 371,400 432,346 410,100 395,000 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 397,800$ 424,227$ 403,600$ 449,662$ 435,000$ 426,000$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 237,000$ 283,300$ 257,100$ 257,395$ 262,800$ 388,500$ 62 - Supplies 10,900 4,791 10,900 3,841 9,900 9,200 63 - Other Services & Charges 107,100 115,466 97,800 138,684 99,500 111,000 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 355,000$ 403,557$ 365,800$ 399,920$ 372,200$ 508,700$ Net Property Tax Supported 42,800$ 20,670$ 37,800$ 49,742$ 62,800$ (82,700)$ 167 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Works (31) Division: Forestry (50) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetForecast 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - 9,973 - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ 9,973$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 62 - Supplies 15,600 13,957 16,100 14,547 16,100 18,100 63 - Other Services & Charges 61,300 48,428 51,800 80,004 53,800 63,800 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 76,900$ 62,385$ 67,900$ 94,551$ 69,900$ 81,900$ Net Property Tax Supported (76,900)$ (52,412)$ (67,900)$ (94,551)$ (69,900)$ (81,900)$ 168 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Works (31) Division: Parks Maintenance (60) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - 486 - 4,215 - - 45 - Charges for Services 500 1,435 500 2,135 - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous 500 - 500 - 1,500 1,900 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 1,000$ 1,921$ 1,000$ 6,350$ 1,500$ 1,900$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 722,200$ 649,114$ 718,700$ 701,436$ 744,100$ 857,600$ 62 - Supplies 117,700 81,055 104,600 108,867 100,600 106,100 63 - Other Services & Charges 122,700 103,950 132,080 119,980 123,800 127,200 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 962,600$ 834,120$ 955,380$ 930,283$ 968,500$ 1,090,900$ Net Property Tax Supported (961,600)$ (832,199)$ (954,380)$ (923,933)$ (967,000)$ (1,089,000)$ 169 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Works (31) Division: Lighting (70) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 28,000$ 27,445$ 17,300$ 16,735$ 18,000$ 18,600$ 62 - Supplies 6,600 14,500 6,500 532 6,500 6,500 63 - Other Services & Charges 224,000 178,741 205,000 185,288 200,000 250,000 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 258,600$ 220,686$ 228,800$ 202,555$ 224,500$ 275,100$ Net Property Tax Supported (258,600)$ (220,686)$ (228,800)$ (202,555)$ (224,500)$ (275,100)$ 170 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Works (31) Division: Street Maintenance (80) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental 387,600 455,586 348,500 424,755 446,500 448,200 45 - Charges for Services 100 - 100 - 100 - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 387,700$ 455,586$ 348,600$ 424,755$ 446,600$ 448,200$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 817,800$ 840,534$ 860,000$ 856,460$ 871,100$ 924,700$ 62 - Supplies 233,100 201,979 229,940 206,901 228,900 244,500 63 - Other Services & Charges 90,500 97,605 333,550 328,892 339,300 354,200 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,141,400$ 1,140,118$ 1,423,490$ 1,392,253$ 1,439,300$ 1,523,400$ Net Property Tax Supported (753,700)$ (684,532)$ (1,074,890)$ (967,498)$ (992,700)$ (1,075,200)$ 171 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Public Works (31) Division: Fleet Services (90) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services - - - - - - 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous 3,200 626 3,200 868 1,100 600 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 3,200$ 626$ 3,200$ 868$ 1,100$ 600$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 398,050$ 390,568$ 371,400$ 363,138$ 409,400$ 429,000$ 62 - Supplies 33,400 16,502 21,900 11,407 19,000 21,500 63 - Other Services & Charges 88,500 15,868 22,350 8,611 13,100 21,400 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 519,950$ 422,938$ 415,650$ 383,156$ 441,500$ 471,900$ Net Property Tax Supported (516,750)$ (422,312)$ (412,450)$ (382,288)$ (440,400)$ (471,300)$ 172 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Parks and Recreation (41) Division: Recreation (00) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits - - - - - - 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services 176,400 22,097 105,800 110,048 159,500 155,500 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous 7,400 5,025 4,400 5,376 2,300 2,800 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 183,800$ 27,122$ 110,200$ 115,424$ 161,800$ 158,300$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 567,000$ 447,754$ 567,200$ 543,379$ 618,900$ 682,600$ 62 - Supplies 60,730 12,191 54,690 21,729 55,100 48,200 63 - Other Services & Charges 226,070 57,941 157,300 99,741 148,000 159,900 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 853,800$ 517,887$ 779,190$ 664,849$ 822,000$ 890,700$ Net Property Tax Supported (670,000)$ (490,764)$ (668,990)$ (549,425)$ (660,200)$ (732,400)$ 173 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Community Development (51) Division: Building Inspections (10) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits 688,300 988,812 687,100 926,961 839,500 764,600 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services 56,800 91,564 56,800 68,315 75,500 67,000 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - 279 - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 745,100$ 1,080,655$ 743,900$ 995,276$ 915,000$ 831,600$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 330,800$ 311,549$ 329,200$ 328,336$ 340,900$ 363,600$ 62 - Supplies 5,280 3,524 4,500 3,098 6,100 6,100 63 - Other Services & Charges 114,840 88,059 115,650 115,478 133,600 132,000 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 450,920$ 403,132$ 449,350$ 446,912$ 480,600$ 501,700$ Net Property Tax Supported 294,180$ 677,523$ 294,550$ 548,364$ 434,400$ 329,900$ 174 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Community Development (51) Division: Planning (20) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments 19,100 33,262 30,200 167,760 22,900 53,300 43 - Licenses and Permits 14,900 4,750 14,900 5,950 5,900 5,900 44 - Intergovernmental - 300 - - - - 45 - Charges for Services 30,900 49,294 60,900 42,302 39,500 227,500 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 64,900$ 87,606$ 106,000$ 216,012$ 68,300$ 286,700$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 508,700$ 432,744$ 525,200$ 481,258$ 530,900$ 738,100$ 62 - Supplies 4,490 2,685 5,250 2,954 5,200 4,400 63 - Other Services & Charges 152,330 197,851 168,410 137,328 226,600 201,000 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 665,520$ 633,280$ 698,860$ 621,540$ 762,700$ 943,500$ Net Property Tax Supported (600,620)$ (545,673)$ (592,860)$ (405,528)$ (694,400)$ (656,800)$ 175 Item 12. Fund: General (101) Department: Community Development (51) Division: Rental Inspections (40) 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023RevenuesBudgetActualBudgetActualBudgetBudget 41 - Taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 - Special Assessments - - - - - - 43 - Licenses and Permits 165,000 172,044 165,000 168,574 175,000 164,000 44 - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 45 - Charges for Services 20,000 7,409 20,000 16,013 16,500 17,600 46 - Fines and Forfeitures - - - - - - 47 - Miscellaneous - - - - - - 49 - Other Financing Sources - - - - - - Total Revenues 185,000$ 179,453$ 185,000$ 184,587$ 191,500$ 181,600$ Expenditures 61 - Personnel Services 216,700$ 160,564$ 220,000$ 220,594$ 231,500$ 245,400$ 62 - Supplies 3,730 1,298 2,790 2,237 2,900 2,900 63 - Other Services & Charges 6,950 2,680 6,810 3,568 8,100 8,100 70 - Capital Outlay - - - - - - 80 - Debt Service - - - - - - 99 - Other Financing Uses - - - - - - Total Expenditures 227,380$ 164,542$ 229,600$ 226,399$ 242,500$ 256,400$ Net Property Tax Supported (42,380)$ 14,911$ (44,600)$ (41,812)$ (51,000)$ (74,800)$ 176 Item 12.