Rezoning -zoa 24-01 scanned file for LFFridleyPUBLIC NOTICE
City of Fridley Planning Commission and City Council
Notice of Public Hearing to Consider a Rezoning by Natasha Lawrence
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing
on September 18, 2024 at 7:00 pm at Fridley City Hall, 7071 University Avenue N.E.
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing on October
14, 2024 at 7:00 pm at Fridley City Hall, 7071 University Avenue N.E.
The public hearing will consider a Rezoning application, (ZOA 24-01) by Nataha Lawrence, to rezone
the property from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family to allow the construction of a duplex,
generally located at 6677 Lucia Lane NE, the legal description is on file and available at Fridley City
Hall.
Any person desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place.
Or, comments may be submitted before the meeting to stacv.stromberg@fridleymn.gov or 763-572-
3595. Publication date: September 6, 2024, & September 20, 2024
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA •� StarTribune
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) 650 3rd Ave. S, Suite 13001 Minneapolis, MN 155488
Terri Swanson, being first duly sworn, on oath states as follows:
1. (S)He is and during all times herein stated has been an employee of the Star Tribune Media Company
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with offices at 650 Third Ave. S., Suite 1300, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55488, or the publisher's designated agent. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in
this Affidavit, which is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §331A.07.
2. The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements to constitute a qualified newspaper under
Minnesota law, including those requirements found in Minnesota Statutes §331A.02.
3. The dates of the month and the year and day of the week upon which the public notice
attached/copied below was published in the newspaper are as follows:
Dates of Publication Advertiser Account # Order #
StarTribune 9/06/2024 FRIDLEY CITY OF 100001997 0000496674
4. The publisher's lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space, as
determined pursuant to § 331A.06, is as follows: $129.56
5. Mortgage Foreclosure Notices. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §580.033 relating to the publication
of mortgage foreclosure notices: The newspaper's known office of issue is located in Hennepin County.
The newspaper complies with the conditions described in §580.033, subd. 1, clause (1) or (2). If the
newspaper's known office of issue is located in a county adjoining the county where the mortgaged
premises or some part of the mortgaged premises described in the notice are located, a substantial
portion of the newspaper's circulation is in the latter county.
FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
Tee v Sul v
Subscribed and sworn to before me on: 03/16/2023
^� ❑rnkE F OAK h: ESIyI+.
Mf 41+�41rf Epa .wwy l 1.7C0
Notary Public
I'RIGAY, SERTEx,GERg. 2024 ,M[MMVI SCIEA9TN lrAlLA[•07
Qi
c
O
N
N
CD C
cu O
N
U C Q
O
> N U c,n
Q Q U) 0
O C
w
to Elri
X
C Q 0
Z
�C
E
Z Qi
a
E •O
-0 0 N O
Q C (n U
qqt
N
N
Jm
y
L
n
E
`V
W
CL
0
C
N
cn
W
Y,�A
N
\V
m
L
u_
CLASSIFIEDS + PUBLIC NOTICES
STARTRIBUNE.COM/CLASSIFIEDS • 612.673.7000 - 800.9279233
w.. . „ 1{ua[wl[eEatnTTt.rxE uMm,.Ntiw...n .aa°° 4x r°°.r..,.T.IS A
S cwuusn. �u[r.nwr eq, E w..wa
�q3 f. LYgC NYX re- usTErwe.T;nN Gse,z. Ia4HEL rY
99ly�µIAI>im.: ``u iu i' .•^sue ro eie
IIIOFln16 a 0�i�povN - axn,e•r+a Harr y�.a s IN. ngi[II11 !o >� vlE*- c GE, INCHES ER.
`I�nY.EiAyu„M1'E;et%s GrYy.1eW�[[r[WOYIL �.�nrYyClusWL 9M.Irp° Nlousenole Gooas
ff1N1144 ,yTrwnwr�e.l urn ry�ej rxYwlN�•lYw• Nlml'1,: = oeonsGog'a°m fiso
TMnslt rqu, Nm[ �[[we P
F�.rwNCrWWT XClirt ell, Ti waiWTs,c gpjy„ays��e`i104f `IWNinc[cNL�I� N rlBsniEiLIVTE v e
elpsaOe. �wn,LT•. ia,., ..� rTNfs.cppf�.•x.{m•�Iw[ [.aceTo
eos P
K6++1 N cuY�ii Y F w aC igw W. [Rils� ls:fi -
.'�mwce. wwia, ..rzT 1,F apt c �eaE"sczsranon["
i 01'in Y a, C 4 -0R IIIWMOALe I,°°sen°la Ile5 ISTH
oaAVE
fie"' PML Y14 �rwzMANY. OM IIAA.ICA I.TEHFTEN sPROPEq
MLS Mrl i[Y011 yY �r�r, yexa VIEW cougT NE,
mow+,. OR[n+wn cM ss irwseuµilvei�. �IS
AI�IE.�,MeIC IiI.+e, C_rte RR,_WjU
IYMC eaxa Iw.4rww+cb Nie rrwr to w,ni u1[. �Yfn I+rM1�w u�.!h'- .
IC-m, ." Sr Mrµgo,25+X� Turn 1L wAPnaA-
[a [r[gEeK sw-aY.:"- ,Aq„L
E. [ N
�wyywa.„f. wre lYl N.v.• s: new rr w[Fw urwwe..L., n,ncol.
.,e 'M• =Mzz . IM�I 01WA,ICF r71N 1NE ewe creca GO :en°la
a qaa«�.,erwea.ga'e.,. S'e,:c'nnernel.i'•-
rx"TM'A, �'EIIN�ir.IlA"w ',':`r"r
�"1 Nt
c e:"rX:: .d'6i`.°."cau.`A., 0:'3011°°:oi;
w'Mdsf•,Iw.Nw GTowr wo0ws![R N1Y NA
a emaar ,aln 2o-+al ,o GG n
uE�!fJ Mi
7�J�r°PlrceanadSodo}�.a,
N011[[l'OFItl,dINL}. g[�yydfAdn FiEmlep Cdllkat.DfA-nRdHu ppElyA(NlrKi"-
RIRT17[NM.KCOlalpl� Eanalxbla wd py dw.el �1Ptr„In°iii °u.�;�°sui° '�'aro�E°N�
[6EEO,uE1[owAlm61G1L[ Nc"d.ihEr IN ,n M rM•ri[^ew- .na rc x w IpYes 4T +kira wa,
WN1CNfAANO OWYde+, Mlbdnl T r9°tlm. I,.Se wmr rp,K I.In. a•wTe:
:XII Ir, ke ,b yi:. MI.Hl.[arrnKT z eYn `ImeeM1e�bu enlgesn `[ q`,.� I,
��xx ��nII[< I1 w01R Len Irfl.re r, IIr� a.+� uw q. d,a wM1' n to hull sum i� orawlll IIwaCTY
[ag04� Nr%ylil e N ner is a nrsz �,yn l[Irma
[ ; 9wl.
NWASIBOAOI dd'l H yW
Ifrreuen �uV�I�run Tlrr 1WY Xp,Yr �lirae4slM 0
,neM1prinn n
C [ARN rN�[rwa lla awWnr '^HTR.rw �3100L WI�^ylllamwlaa oms usn`Y we� ee
aa
.C� wOr �sl name cemvlele ,
rr t1 ng a emaaenneas " m a Il III eI a
Np. ^+ � �, •" 3[wna[Nrea rw a.afa °= NN ems e .di
4in n I"Tr e. lu+ lrtYIrM1 ie{r krumalei oo laneLyy
e.i r YHNVuH[ C� CrraM�``u XaY. A][ Ian MnitOi enu�A ga,,.,er.,l,.�- �vn
a`c'nrrl`rXWw can aw,�,,i 41 mft
e�rleean wi'la'�rw.ln aen[n.rwee,.� .ra ..wra.
rNar lr rmeN [iA°o. iielS wr, .
wwr< �. a 4,ee' <e. ew � eenuN.rlr I w 1:en. Hi,µ a T
NYr 1e rnln,r anu e+n^•, Ilan 609 B ni! h.d slgnea
Ihg,eeeafrM C/e'[w W! NlsKcertinca[e-.3W. a1M1.
naaaa n�
x.. wr,X wnL qw ..,N.n.w „`r,aw�a"f"�.n°"T,ier�ir IiMa,r-on oni""i�G'T`Ice`s �r
w nrr.� rervw oetne w�IN
erne[ M[r leywnl pry y M *.,a wazlbnxrulneM1ggmail com n �+
� rr�ROdTXn4W.
9r 1mLYlAr
rrvrw �� L"�°.n [eNT bn..Iw - ... waeiiw iM •`°
�iiS`0`in+iii .iY,ww..ga Year 2°'" ront^w<°e,a„y start mwlrwucK�urtT "rY.""rL...e.ea
w.,N,ai..aN nAaNaord °�^" EwwsmwsrlE >d.ae�w�tl� •wwne.,.erX
'LSe sr,.w: r• srnen..[r'a. zs. nen.� er,rair oxv
Ta.>ola wwano,a r„��,,.a-,aar.
N M11/rin A►spe[[5[[asnwa r[,aW pe>,yar[! niNKnOeq lM oec
atur a �` [�K�eCi4 �IsawMr. eAnrNrM a
��pplI�l�pp�[ x,[e n ^neeT P'•an my .lea- ry
s,eMewpnyepNysaa�xerTarrwi r. der Na80TdlilYd IYdblr>b oar K �t�f a rt� II.H,ILwTaigngOar[r►,gl �� N
rr,� lPf [r �YI[�iEa;��r Y�I�� �Sp� s-ra�rs� r^,imuWjseap�}a.[ya�eg�l'�eYr
T�rr�pp� _ rpup wyn Ins�esap �{ai�nsa, �ul�aC '� ieEvq 1e�CrS
tua.A .n;imni M Gmww�C Iwinlx rsa+rW��Wwr P ara[X�. 1aa,,�M"vYwilm' oS Ne [we`yrlY 11 Y a�w
Me'rl"IrxrMw,l�"w. -.1Me wel Iurfq[ IL pp¢�� t01 w - [ Na �eyaa� q��ep�x r�a"nAii
M �r!' wNs. ld.�l u,F „�� Knrf pME � urm`M k�;�Wa•ery
Y ,..a � zw� rwmll eeT. ,rR[, Maarll nl. xtrw.Yna .[pipinnlA►wn �e.r�`NomOarlM [awry
w y^nA w+0[M.
aaee [, I S� Lae TXr nrldk Nu'ey rrA iai["aQ - Hr ens. +IA/rl'+ a Wu-A-
u-
nKN YR �`M~- Mee:''WN Nx[ ,
p+n. 'a'w w XaJ eX a _ Ham` iraN civil, me-
tlr Ce fu oTfA14[I. WC K, p..�y b� ,.prMy�[iip 1ppYy. [dmil[y l . II olumbiny
��Ir �[F
rp'IH�r u. emnu gµewe.y pryylpeH In yyXsel
plpary,w"` WIM O•rnrndL
MeI nN[r T+�w e 1 Mr[P i`N[ !Tare [rer,ran w, h. �w : � waxer wewaa w a lenrw m,ivio�warr"6XaX raw
l ne oRanw�e°
CiT1'0} 1454 f1EC qe ,c¢rt ua �<•vaa[ AvIX.�r�`"aN.�n Inr prlll v[[nf � Itl n
CIMNTTIIF.kwA I.e4ieir[ �✓n L. > p tee.�
,r n CervNexw Tn oeenen°ce'
iTME0[A9NNES0TG ' r It �I"r`Ea ^[aT,r = s A[re cl�il. me I.
MICNGlYNO w�[ �1.lOJa" 1� L '�° �0 i'�'6inan"� °Jnnn
�prp�njsn enr[weeJ Y .Lair Mfe Nervere Cyr C MR or rrc Fref�K OttEEer [..iLft ��rfwa ewu . w ME
alP,•n�� riI v�e ard.
rw s., !dll CID,
Nnnle �d.[I q•ea�u.e�EEsnuyiv eY�'i �Ir In�w�rrn�v r�°Wuhan la.+next 'en
r4 GI7 C1[rtl alml�w[ w [nvrmrnuw� ��w ���n,,eerr WamrN IE°i A.tA4fWYRTM WOWdWa
'isrL s,•rwr w lNi n ty1 �rV ea WH i•M, I�bY�,.4y�[a �•Iei we [mebf�ATaena � w
�qe! �waycae,n wKfN[M 2• HNUXe nerve aMre erel �rvr< r�etl"in NaOr•. rM nlvwMk N1 rsaaserA[It I[ �I i w[ �w'm �n'A 10}i wr ,xpM1Mra--_ tap'n Vx1al10[. 1KsM k rIi
,�� � [IY.r- ew;,., ,m. s•�rK4�.. I � nr .ter"'
p Wiown.wn �wMm1[`<l�tRNp•mnerywH�W �,e -Cow
C4 M .&-iip!=
lnni.F5 bj y ebem9c'a+exmrtws �_esYre�re�a�.irYi ariar�u[+.es[ Us{ebthal In�bp`a[,.roe.^•- I lrewfeamee[e�exr�.��.ynresrexx¢[u eN
y,b�w�,v j�. �MerinI :aura ,'a tti „ �i4
rYrnYwra Y �k r IL Imi a rrn'n Y p/�Irt, pra�Y�
ire ��,^e uw .rnlw`�rY.vei [cW W[x'YY... �10'IYs n •y1 neeO �� Fah . NE.w pwlrte
� w[w Nwi geµeX lye rrwrr�lie'rryw`el,.e an wah111aMr Yw
Gera xXir m [ ew . N4.Z °�" 1T1Me p�ppK' n ualawe aM i Mrr v yf�il a!"Yr�rela � � � drrxiavnl�EY.p'eIIH [i we aTeulRrlbJS
YT�1.bu�,n y Isle a+w+r • #x w 11Ye^ '"^ wnnia'�v MwN aWrnnN
urgr6Tw � Wrwer r Lrlx .� fE[[es kXn uw1� [N�%iI as M [Iv �sr eI f
N N aJWrnee rneae/A win w � w x[ ere • Trta�enyval� wN� ^ne•ew
pMrr naalpwl fM,v4+.x . u n wa„rtlf` M n t C,yePryY[ ire be�s'ean•+>ry n. ypc[e Nl �wN M iya YI ep en�cl
AYVrr n OniYµInNeltpr innI�.n_ fLwtl`rvae w> rom paaIalp Yentn�n� esremuX e[nm.eTrn�.rr�ee "rvnIrrIN'Tw. .Wer0wA. R[Giw0w4'Ew nw[nw.rro�rwr y✓n?Y ij�ewIaIiws+m<mNn `af
KI�vvlprHm,xywnpe [rpv `Tlnr'N+[q A,IhgWni i �fJ.. .erNlswMOe wn5MTxxwsn10
wen�.+1Me:rIvrr°n• +w aYn<nnie[Sae.A rswM<• e.• nNaYrww_�uBIn
=1. CwIrI4. 1H, OVPmeslev,
WaXip.faT W110{
!NuN rA ` �m! of MEK xr lITrO
,YTr ur..[ Impn mus NAZC -topInr`>h I[ 1!rw„uapWt��+:,... Irr wnm><•.
M�•r pw O:.x
wTggWea nLrwGxs aN[:`w+ ,,.T"' il. lc= nS ng
r,.sn. x.a r +-wa• s.,iL. x.I � iwe u e.�..ewww`�"r •awn M1w"'+ ,nYia xaarra oS:ua. iw�R• � ii. Y.. tl' .ew,.'.." �en.wrewl,
(16SidNIN01VRIC NlSpOE ra.<�"`bir. �v�ia.mr. Ieen[.Ig xa. ,a Yor-
n.aarn, w.wwwe •Y[oN lore - s + pa Ywwx :.n..µN "[tl11�°"" nLs nT"0.se
1WerY1EL Itgv0.Tll Xl. RCtle}1. Tou eb MxCY sMeW Sw��ix A.p+.n,n
�• � Anatl�ra mnHlea �Mn � ,r� wTMw�rX�v rXa�1 ma,Nw�14T�N [u�•
��¢¢yy unOiYrQt� etl'xee4+,fm`q`+ j[ie1. M:nlrNry �tl1�. a�x awry • as Yri. MI Ila�.litlp~nL`ka`
4,Mj }a iewln ne+rtEl9 w wer[M )- ran n�nne� r.g .,
��I,1oN01fIn 9:rseaLl�SM � samw.rWi �wn11Rw< �N, Wr.
y3ia�iP
arv.ovvc»rrei wmn•rtmara wr, NaTwrTwm anrtt amenr
¢rYweYertae. Assumed Nnme }Nre.ea��a�a� aY. ee elr
OY
.o. n[r.arsnvllrs[ I ws.V1T t,•ya IN a �ex [.aIMXY
Ouro arCXNlxo wYP� a Sit u.vwu Ha! Na e[ y,yq
x Y[�wia ,rer l^a¢ wrre n w ��NW� v�Le�xM�[[<• q�sn��1e %1 [�1
rQHa M'eT wn �.w ewn.n •e,� rere� ur.
ml VHIL[wtt wvav ere rluwr.. Xf•`nt`W eM lxin w etim•rY�sYNerf+l 4 wttTaYMrtrsee1wer�w^IFmenna ser
t� Y i-Hwll�+h an �+Ya d n wwvae rn xf, Is�wX{ne: awn �uC NW�ru lr�,
�u ni0. �r�.L���NaN��[e [yseatexss ear Nuti:[� 7 nwxrsmvin e. xl3 NIUTRe!
aAr[ Owli1R�}OY L as ne p ps. q FEN
�rpTXe
!WS'',ALii ww�[��ffrr'+aT1pLu i NaaT ae w>twu am [WrCa,rlr+`�iiAeTp`4waMnr[1R11{>•es
MM.,
� e0i0N M 1<t N sNr M+. xi.. I:Ier< W wa►"w^wa i Iael Iwe Yr fearLlk
Taii.ei""'.iL`"`eui'oinwirnl .`s""i .r .'l.eNe°ra elm.ennue"e.°°rre`a"`
�aw{ wi H1C� YI.w 1P1 X.1 rlgl. 1�. 1y t_^-.i'rl L{.'rygn�± InE
e4aelv.,wlTF�ulOBuflprev. 1n slw ropT uq Eij�saW Niirx�itili k1,Y[If
��0}�! �IWer� Nh�IXY I_A- Xlu
1w rveavl+}We 1 �e�pT+'�eMi [e� �I n nilaaef{e ms[r•��raik � mi
v AOwfgl�E LIIA..O tmwm .TC min �xe1�1? s vim. oIl OC[ITi
i dEyL�ioa[W[irn I_= W_ , Ge any.IM1ex
r rY0.xa�)rl wlnnM1vn Xwm•w Wst Meru if.]ga.
;�„�;'w•"�[a• StarTribune
���^ °n�•I�'<" �StarTribune
low
GO, of
Fridley
Fridley Civic Campus
7071 University Ave N.E. Fridley, MN 55432
763-571-3450 1 FAX: 763-571-1287 1 FridleyMN.gov
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
To: Property Owners and Residents within 350 feet 6677 Lucia Lane NE
Applicant: Natasha Lawrence
Request: The petitioner is requesting a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by Natasha
Lawrence, to rezone the property from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -
Family to allow the construction of a duplex, generally located at 6677
Lucia Lane NE, the legal description is on file and available at Fridley Civic
Campus
Date of Hearings: Planning Commission Meeting, Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 7:00
p.m.
The Planning Commission meeting is televised live the night of the
meeting on Channel 17.
City Council Meeting, Monday, October 14, 2024 at 7:00 p.m.
The Council meeting is televised live the night of the meeting on Channel
17.
Location of Planning Commission and City Council Meeting Hearing: Meeting will be held in
person at Fridley Civic Campus located at 7071 University Avenue NE.
How to Participate: 1. You may attend the public hearing in person and testify.
2. You may submit a letter in advance of the meeting to Stacy Stromberg,
Planning Manager at the address above or by email at
stacy.stro m berg @fri d I eym n.g ov
Questions: Call or Email Stacy Stromberg, Planning Manager at 763-572-3595 or
stacy.strom berg @fri d I eym n.gov
Mailing date: September 6, 2024 Publication dates: September 6, and 20, 2024
*If you require auxiliary aids or services to participate to communicate in the meeting, please contact
Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 or roberta.collins@�ridlevmn.gov no later than September 77, 2024 for the
Planning Commission meeting and October 7, 2024 for the City Council meeting. The TDD # is: 763-572-
3534.
r Community Development Department
Fridley Public Hearing Notice
• VI
f.�
tall
f �
E
0
7
soon,,
'OV ,
iIL
15 V7 -7f
'
LU
BI r Z- •' cry i'
—�Jli 4
'I10
1050
e ? f r 3 • ECG r�rt� �QC' Ii
Ilk
16596 �599
G 55 ii; 96�p i 6 G
6466 k —'
6550 ,,^ q LL
.•r_e 6 1
i r C 4-
4—
'G
p
SOURCES
Fridley Engineering and Planning Rezoning, ZOA #24-01 and Comprehensive N
Fridley GIs
Anoka County GIS Plan Amendment, CP #24-01 Requests w E
Petitioner: Natasha Lawrence
Address: 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. S
Map Date: 9/5/2024
LABELS FOR
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6854 CHANNEL RD NE
6630 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6709 CHANNEL RD NE
6716 CHANNEL RD NE
6630 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6816 CHANNEL RD NE
6831 HIGHWAY 65 NE
6648 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6830 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
6670 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6846 CHANNEL RD NE
6701 CHANNEL RD NE
6640 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6800 CHANNEL RD NE
6675 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6810 CHANNEL RD NE
6631 LUCIA LN NE
6670 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6710 CHANNEL RD NE
6621 LUCIA LN NE
6645 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
6734 CHANNEL RD NE
6620 CHANNEL RD NE
6676 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
Current Resident
Current Resident
FRIDLEY MN 55432
6620 LUCIA LN NE
6700 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
FRIDLEY MN 55432
LABELS FOR
Current Resident
Current Resident
6663 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
6610 PIERCE ST NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
Current Resident
6677 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
LABELS FOR HAMDAN, DAOUD PARRALES RODRIGUEZ ESMERIDA P
Parcel Owner 6854 CHANNEL RD NE 6630 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
I1-12 PROPERTY ILLINOIS LP ALLEN TRUSTEE, WILBUR C MCGINNIS RYAN G & THORESON J J
1717 MAIN ST STE 2000 6716 CHANNEL RD NE 6630 CHANNEL RD NE
DALLAS TX 75201 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
BROUILLARD SCOTT G MASJID AL-ISRAA WELLS, ROBERT L
6816 CHANNEL RD NE 6831 HIGHWAY 65 NE 6648 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
HAKE CAYLIE BERNAL DELGADO, KELLIE C AANESTAD, BARBARA JEAN
6830 CHANNEL RD NE 6631 LUCIA LN NE 6670 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
STUBBS JUDY A MUCK, RUSSELL S CHRISTIANSON DANIEL L
6846 CHANNEL RD NE 6701 CHANNEL RD NE 6640 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
SIMMONS, GEORGE M CHIVATERO GAYLE S FRIDLEY CITY OF
6800 CHANNEL RD NE 6675 CHANNEL RD NE 7071 UNIVERSITY AVE NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
BORNTRAGER, GARRET BERNAL DELGADO, JORGE R LUCIA LANE APARTMENTS LLC
6810 CHANNEL RD NE 6631 LUCIA LN NE 1881 STATION PKWY
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 ANDOVER MN 55304
DAHL HANNAH STEELE QUENTIN J & BRENDA L BARAHONA OLGA VIVAR
6710 CHANNEL RD NE 6621 LUCIA LN NE 6645 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
MEWS, JAKE A KEENEY, NATHAN HUBER CHARLES J & LINDA L
6734 CHANNEL RD NE 6620 CHANNEL RD NE 6676 CHANNEL RD NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA THRONDSON LUANN PETRY LARRY NORMAN
6831 HWY 65 NE 6620 LUCIA LN NE 6700 CHANNEL RD
FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432
LABELS FOR
Parcel Owner
KNICKERBOCKER, MARCUS J
6663 LUCIA LN NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
RAI, RAJEEV K
6610 PIERCE ST NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
LAWRENCE NATASHA
675 LUCIA LN
FRIDLEY MN 55432
LAND USE APPLICATION SUMMARY
Item: ZOA #24-01
Meeting Date: September 18, 2024
Item 3.
Fridley
General Information Special Information
Applicant:
Natasha Lawrence
3760 Silve Lake Rd NE
St. Anthony, MN 55421
Requested Action:
Public Hearing to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA
#24-01 to change the zoning of the property
located at 6677 Lucia Lane from R-1, Single -
Family to R-3, Multi-Fam
Existing Zoning:
R-1, Single Family
Size:
50,540 sq. ft. 1.16 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant lot
Surrounding Land -use & Zoning:
N: Single Family Home & R-3
E: Singel Family Home & R-1
S: Single Family Home & R-1
W: Apartment Building & R-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Existing and Future Land Use Plan designate
the property for single family — Request to
change.
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
Section 205.09 of the Zoning Code requires a
minimum lot area of 10,000 sq. ft. for three-
family units and 15,000 sq. ft. for four -family
units — provided all other code requirements
are met.
Building and Zoning History:
Lot was originally part of 6663 Lucia Lane.
2018 — Lot was replated to created three
single-family lots.
2023 — Two lots were combined to make one
large single-family lot.
2024 — Drainage and Utility easements vacated.
Legal Description of Property:
Lot 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition.
Public Utilities:
The new structure will need to be connected to
City water and sewer services.
Transportation:
The new structure will be accessed off Lucia
Lane.
Physical Characteristics:
Large tree -covered single-family lot, with
wetlands on the north side.
Summary of Request:
The petitioner, Natasha Lawrence is requesting
to have the properly at 7766 Lucia Lane rezoned
from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family. The
current plan before the City as part of this
application is to construct a duplex.
Staff Recommendation:
City staff recommends approval of the Rezoning,
with stipulations.
Neighboring multi -family land uses and
zoning allow for requested change.
• Large lot size could allow for more than a
single-family unit.
City Council Action/60 Day Action Date:
City Council — October 14, 2024
60 Day Date — October 14, 2024
Staff Report Prepared by Stacy Stromberg
F 1
Written Report —
See CPA #24-01 Report
Dear City Council/Planning Board,
I am requesting a zoning change for our property at 6677 Lucia Lane/Parcel Number
13-30-24-24-0118 from single-family to multi -family residential. This change is necessary due to
the character of our neighborhood, particularly the multi -family apartments and businesses
directly across the street.
The presence of these apartment buildings and commercial establishments has formed the area
into a more urban environment, characterized by increased density and a diverse mix of residents
and activities. Given these circumstances, our plans for a single-family home didn't align with
the neighborhood's evolving nature.
Rezoning to multi -family would better reflect the current dynamics of the area, accommodate
new housing needs, and align with the surrounding developments. This change will help us adapt
to the current environment and make more effective use of the property.
Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,
Natasha Lawrence
11696 207th St. W. #8112, Lakeville, MN 55044
651-329-6783/ tashalawrencel @yahoo.com
F�pr.
NW 'A.1 Ili
IN 1GOtl A3lltlA
52555 NW 'AingpooM
r N'�^^,'.e OK-41n5'anNp avawwo7 LOL ^
JV W ti���S3WOH WO.LS 3 3AIIV3113
orirerwore NOS'IiiV7 A3AIInS d0 31WHALL1133 ° s
fr •i'^
S
W , as s d v3
o 3i -z£ •,L, !1
4-,0 a -' se=
O F F T' Eo
` e F
4 gg§ g@§�pplasgg € s `s $ a1
4r � Qz is r i 3 d�G 9�995385i�s�� §S aeg^ ang e. &�
{ 3 F r 3 339333 3g� a VIP
. � ��// {ij{{[.ty[
U 3;£
j FG
_-_ ==1Mua
---------------
r __________________________ j
I I. ti
� I j
I ,
I r
� 1 k� 1 3 Z 1 � � I i •��
,y r
i I
c� ; 1•� 1 rnI
I 1 = r• �I 4I
r
N5
F-
'-------------`------------------
it it 1. ^ it Ir
0 V h
ie M- -�:.res✓s =F=sir- c—�.---`__�•-_.--'�`._.
it -_—_—_ ,.T1._.—._..�' �_�_
STI0172112-O£-£I 13.? Vd 101
Z£b55 NW 'h3142113a:
g as
c?€la�l�r `�L: ii' ` 3NV1 VI�fII LL99 vwn �� � � a@ i 'J � ■9 .9 -5 a� a � �5 � � � � y
z1esl;I! H€ iHe
lffll
� it •.
��IfllllllllElllllll[IlElllllllllll
IIII
�� ;��lllllllllll �
�I flr■ ,^ ,
�� �+ t4� �� 11111-1 IIIIIII�I
1
•'�I�lllllllllll'
r
II urruunrltl
IfllIIllIIIIII
I1�11
II��III�III�'
�IIII111E�IIIIIIIIIII �!'�'
II,
llllllll �, i{ �Ir1
RRRt
I11!lllil
11tI
3111111illlllli 1 �1 �1.1
„r11Nail inlmii,
lllllllillllill I
i � 1r-1 r• <..� IIIIIIIIIII�11
1I� ,f iiiiiiiil. �I�I��[III` 111111
----
llllllll
�III RIII�
I ; ilia li�i III�[ull
■ + IIIII�IIIII
�IlElllfllllllElllllnlnllEllll
■p ` i
8TT0-bZ-bZ-OE-ET L!1
Z£b99 NW ATIQ2II3??YY �3Ndl HIOIII L199J "11 o � � N
s au € sS r" B e a a s
aC k
, I
, , I
bu i Q Co
----------
.au wa a,r .na
81 0112-17Z-OC-El 12O21Vd 101 t 6
ZEK9 NW'/OIQU�
3NVI viqn-I LL99
aaa
^r i1i el ��aw`w v 0
'pa;e l tr 8IT0-bZ-bZ-O£ EI 13�21Vd101 oa $ aa
-.
w33s"s S� J1t 1, u�.
aa:� � �[{ Z£b56 NWh31421I3 vaw �.�
` '.'I;gii f[i i; 3NVl vi.?nl LL99 upd. �. gg
s r if "I'll, M! mod. rn.a �� ^I
�
I
fl
I
.i,a
.fR
ry
U
-
I
pa
_
Planning Commission 9/18/2024 Minutes Page 6
Chair Hansen asked the opinion of the additional stipulation.
Commissioner Brom commented that it does not seem enforceable.
Commissioner Klemz stated that the opinion of the City Attorney would ultimately be needed, and it
would be the ultimate decision of the City Council as to whether that stipulation is necessary.
Motion by Commission r Klemz, to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA
#24-01 to Change t Future Land Use from Single Family Residential to Multi -Family Residential for
the Property Loco d at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. with Stipulations. Seconded by Commissioner Heuchert.
Upon a voice/vote, all voting aye, Chair Hansen declared the motion carried unanimously.
3. Public Hearing to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01 to Change the Zoning of the Property
Located at 6677 Lucia Lane from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family
Motion by Commissioner Klemz, to recommend approval of a Rezoning, ZOA #24-07 to Change the
Zoning of the Property Located at 6677 Lucia Lane from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family
Seconded by Commissioner Heuchert.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chair Hansen declared the motion carried unanimously.
Other Business
Ms. Stromberg provided an update on recent activity of the City Council on planning related matters
and also noted anticipated future meetings for the Commission.
Adjournment
Motion by Commissioner Brom to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Borman.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chair Hansen declared the motion carried unanimously and the meeting
adjourned at 7:46 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Stacy Stromberg, Staff Liaison
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: October 14, 2024 Meeting Type: City Council
Submitted By: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Stacy Stromberg, Planning Manager
Title
t
Ordinance No. 1425, Public Hearing and First Reading to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by Natasha
Lawrence to Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family
(Ward 2)
Background
Natasha Lawrence, who is the property owner of 6677 Lucia Lane NE, is requesting to have the property
rezoned from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -
Family. To approve a rezoning there must be
similarly zoned land adjacent to the property. The
apartment building property to the west is zoned
R-3, Multi -Family as are the properties to the
north; therefore this request to rezone is
consistent with the zoning on neighboring
properties.
The plans submitted with this rezoning application
are to construct a duplex on the south end of the
property. However, once the property is rezoned
to R-3, Multi -Family, a larger building could be
constructed based on the large lot size. Any new
building constructed on the property will need to
comply with all code requirements, related to
setbacks, parking, landscape and stormwater
treatment and wetland protections A wetland
IR"3 a F
R-1 ; -1 R-1 R-1 R-1 ' Y
{ R-3
R-1 . .
;R-3 R-1
` R-1 R 1
R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3
R-1
R-3
R-1
,ice`r R-1
.: 6677 R-1
R-I R 1
i
R
- R• I R-1
F--I R-1 R"1
R-1
delineation was completed in 2021, and the submitted map (below) shows the location of existing
wetlands on the property. The locations of the wetlands limit the buildable area of the lot.
A Notice of Public Hearing before the Planning Commission and the City Council was published in the
September 6, 2024, and September 20, 2024, editions of the City's Official Publication.
Vision Statement
We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses.
The Planning Commission held a
public hearing for ZOA#24-01 at their
meeting on September 18, 2024.
The Commission asked if they could
place a stipulation on the rezoning that
only a duplex could be constructed on
the property. Staff responded that
once the property is rezoned to Multi -
Family, a larger structure could be
constructed, if, all other code
requirements can be met. Staff has
confirmed this with the City Attorney.
The Commission recommended
approval of the Rezoning for the
property at 6677 Lucia Lane, with the
below listed stipulations.
All necessary permits shall be
obtained prior to construction.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the City's engineering staff prior
to the issuance of any building permits, to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties.
3. The property owner at the time of building permit application shall provide proof that any existing
wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed.
4. The property owner at the time of building permit application shall pay the required park
dedication fee of $1,500 per dwelling unit.
S. The property owner at the time of building permit application shall pay all water and sewer
connection fees for the new building.
The motion for approval carried unanimously.
Unless otherwise directed, the second reading of the ordinance is scheduled for the October 28, 2024
City Council meeting.
Financial Impact
No financial impact.
Recommendation
Staff recommend the City Council conduct a public hearing and first reading of Ordinance No. 1425,
Public Hearing and First Reading to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by Natasha Lawrence to
Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family (Ward 2).
Vision Statement
We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses.
Focus on Fridley Strategic Alignment
X Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building
Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship
Organizational Excellence
Attachments and Other Resources
■ Ordinance No. 1425
• Land Use Application and Staff Report to Planning Commission
Vision Statement
We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses.
Ordinance No. 1425
Amending the Zoning Code of the City of Fridley
The City of Fridley does ordain, after review, examination and staff recommendation the following:
Section 1.
That Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated.
Section 2.
The tracts of areas within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley addressed as:
6677 Lucia Lane N.E. and legally described as:
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota
(Torrens Property)
SECTION 3.
That the Community Development Director, or their designee is directed to change the official
zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoning District R-1, Single Family to R-
3, General Multiple Units.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley on this 10 day of October 2024.
Scott J. Lund - Mayor
Melissa Moore - City Clerk
Public Hearing: October 14, 2024
First Reading: October 14, 2024
Second Reading:
Publication:
LAND USE APPLICATION SUMMARY
Item: CPA #24-01
Meeting Date: September 18, 2024
Fridley
General Information Special Information
Applicant:
Natasha Lawrence
11696 207th St. W. #8112
Lakeville, MN 55044
Requested Action:
Public Hearing to Consider a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment, CPA #24-01 to change the
future land use from Single Family Residentia
to Multi -Family Residential for the property
located at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E.
Existing Zoning:
R-1, Single Famill
Size:
50,540 sq. ft. 1.16 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacantlot
Surrounding Land use & Zoning:
N: Single Family Home & R-3
E: Singel Family Home & R-1
S: Single Family Home & R-1
W: Apartment Building & R-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Existing and Future Land Use Plan designate
the property for single family — Request to
change.
Building and Zoning History:
Lot was originally part of 6663 Lucia Lane.
2018 — Lot was replatted to create three single-
family lots.
2023 — Two lots were combined to make one
large single-family lot.
2024 — Drainage and Utility easements vacated.
Legal Description of Property:
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition.
Public Utilities:
The new structure will need to be connected to
City water and sewer services.
Transportation:
The new structure will be accessed off Lucia
Lane.
Physical Characteristics:
Large tree -covered single-family lot, with
wetlands on the north side.
Summary of Request:
The petitioner, Natasha Lawrence, is requesting a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the
future land use of the property at 6677 Lucia
Lane from Single Family Residential to Multi -
Family Residential.
Staff Recommendation:
City staff recommends approval of the
comprehensive plan amendment, with
stipulations.
City Council Action/60 Day Action Date:
City Council — October 14, 2024
60 Day Date — October 14, 2024
Staff Report Prepared by Stacy Stromberg
LAND USE APPLICATION SUMMARY
Item: ZOA #24-01
Meeting Date: September 18, 2024
Fridley
General Information Special Information
Applicant:
Natasha Lawrence
11696 207th St. W. #8112
Lakeville, MN 55044
Requested Action:
Public Hearing to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA
#24-01 to change the zoning of the property
located at 6677 Lucia Lane from R-1, Single -
Family to R-3, Multi -Family.
Existing Zoning:
R-1, Single Family
Size:
50,540 sq. ft. 1.16 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant lot
Surrounding Land -use & Zoning:
N: Single Family Home & R-3
E: Singel Family Home & R-1
S: Single Family Home & R-1
W: Apartment Building & R-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Existing and Future Land Use Plan designate
the property for single family — Request to
change.
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
Section 205.09 of the Zoning Code requires a
minimum lot area of 10,000 sq. ft. for three-
family units and 15,000 sq. ft. for four -family
units — provided all other code requirements
are met.
Building and Zoning History:
Lot was originally part of 6663 Lucia Lane.
2018 — Lot was replated to created three
single-family lots.
2023 — Two lots were combined to make one
large single-family lot.
2024 — Drainage and Utility easements vacated.
Legal Description of Property:
Lot 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition.
Public Utilities:
The new structure will need to be connected to
City water and sewer services.
Transportation:
The new structure will be accessed off Lucia
Lane.
Physical Characteristics:
Large tree -covered single-family lot, with
wetlands on the north side.
Summary of Request:
The petitioner, Natasha Lawrence is requesting
to have the property at 7766 Lucia Lane rezoned
from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family. The
current plan before the City as part of this
application is to construct a_ duplex.
Staff Recommendation:
City staff recommends approval of the Rezoning,
with stipulations.
Neighboring multi -family land uses and
zoning allow for requested change.
• Large lot size could allow for more than a
single-family unit.
City Council Action/60 Day Action Date:
City Council — October 14, 2024
60 Day Date — October 14, 2024
Staff Report Prepared by Stacy Stromberg
Written Report —
The Request
The petitioner, Natasha Lawrence is the owner of the property at 6677 Lucia Lane, and is requesting
two land use approvals.
A Comprehensive (Comp) Plan Amendment Request - The 2040 Comp Plan designates the future
land use of the property as single-family residential, and the petitioner is requesting an amendment
to change the land use designation to Multi -Family.
A Rezoning Request - The subject property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family and the petitioner
is requesting to have the property rezoned to R-3, Multi -Family.
Site Description and History
The subject property is on the east side of Lucia Lane, next to the newly constructed cul-de-sac. The
property is zoned R-1, Single Family as are the properties to the east and south. The properties to
the north and west are zoned R-3, Multi -Family. The subject property was originally part of 6663
Jl -_ - ; Lucia Lane. In 2018, the 6663
parcel was subdivided to create
° three single-family lots. The
petitioner purchased the two
It.,I Big" 11[1V:
•=l�6r[I�.ry
Jt6ej40rs +
+is
li670 A*
Comprehensive Plan Analysis
�.r
G663
vacant lots in 2023, and then
combined the two lots into one
large lot. The petitioner had
planned to construct a new
single-family house on the
property, but has since decided
not to, and pursue these land use
requests.
The plans submitted with the
rezoning request show that the
petitioner would like to construct
a duplex on the subject property.
The 2040 Comp Plan's Future Land Use Map designates the site as "Single -Family Residential."
Single -Family Residential Land Use is defined as, "Lots or parcels containing single family detached
housing, including manufactured homes, 1-4 units/acre." The petitioner is requesting to modify
that designation to "Multi -Family Residential," which applies to "Lots or parcels containing multiple
dwelling units, such as duplexes, twin homes, townhomes, quad homes, and apartment complexes,
from 9-40 units/acre..."
This property was likely guided for Single -Family Residential because there is a single-family house
on the lot (6663 Lucia Lane) this lot was originally created from, and the lots to the north, east, and
south also have single-family homes on them. Despite the single-family use of the properties to the
north, the properties are zoned R-3, Multi -Family, as is the apartment building property across Lucia
Lane.
The Comp Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the property is in conjunction
with the request to rezone the property from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family.
The Housing Chapter within the Comp Plan notes that the City is lacking in a wide variety of
housing types. Over the last 5 years, the City has seen the construction of several new multi -story
apartment buildings. The housing type proposed with this application has not recently been built in
Fridley. The application helps support a variety of housing options for resident.
Lastly, amendments to the Comp Plan need to be approved by the City Council and the
Metropolitan (Met) Council. The Met Council considers this a minor amendment and therefore has
waived the requirement to notify neighboring jurisdictions.
Rezoning Analysis
The City's zoning ordinance and official zoning map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve
the vision for the City, which is then established within the Comp Plan. The City has discretion to
"rezone" property from one district to another as long as the zoning meets the intent of the Comp
Plan. Additionally, state law prevents "spot zoning." "Spot zoning" is defined as zoning changes
which establish a use
classification inconsistent with
surrounding uses and create an
island of nonconforming uses
within a larger zoned district.
To approve a rezoning, there
must be similarly zoned land
adjacent to the property. The
apartment building property to
the west is zoned R-3, Multi -
Family as are the properties to
the north, therefore, this request
to rezone is consistent with the
zoning on neighboring
properties.
The plans submitted with this
rezoning application are to
construct a duplex on the south
end of the property. However, once the property is rezoned to R-3, Multi -Family, a larger building
could be constructed based on the large lot size. Any new building constructed on the property will
need to comply with all code requirements, related to setbacks, parking, landscape and stormwater
treatment and wetland protections. A wetland delineation was completed in 2021, and the
submitted map shows the location of existing wetlands on the property. Wetlands limit the
buildable area of the lot.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Planning Commission hold public hearings for Comp Plan Amendment, CPA
#24-01, and Rezoning, ZOA #24-01.
Staff recommends approval of the Comp Plan Amendment CPA #24-01 to change the future land
use guidance for the site, with stipulations.
Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning to R-3, Multi -Family Zoning District, ZOA #24-01, with
stipulations.
Stipulations
Staff recommends the following stipulations on the Comp Plan Amendment, CPA #24-01:
1. The City Council's approval of the Rezoning from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family.
2. The City Council's approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is contingent upon the
Metropolitan Council's approval of said amendment.
Staff recommends the following stipulations on Rezoning, ZOA #24-01.
1. All necessary permits shall be obtained prior to construction.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the City's engineering staff
prior to issuance of any building permits, to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties.
3. The property owner at time of building permit application shall provide proof that any
existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly
capped or removed.
4. The property owner at time of building permit application shall pay the required park
dedication fee of $1,500 per dwelling unit.
5. The property owner at time of building permit application shall pay all water and sewer
connection fees for the new building.
Attachments
Comp Plan Amendment
Proposed 2040 Future Land Use Map
Rezoning
• Petitioner's Narrative and Drawings
• Public Hearing Notices and Map
Dear City Council/Planning Board,
I am requesting a zoning change for our property at 6677 Lucia Lane/Parcel Number
13-30-24-24-0118 from single-family to multi -family residential. This change is necessary due to
the character of our neighborhood, particularly the multi -family apartments and businesses
directly across the street.
The presence of these apartment buildings and commercial establishments has formed the area
into a more urban environment, characterized by increased density and a diverse mix of residents
and activities. Given these circumstances, our plans for a single-family home didn't align with
the neighborhood's evolving nature.
Rezoning to multi -family would better reflect the current dynamics of the area, accommodate
new housing needs, and align with the surrounding developments. This change will help us adapt
to the current environment and make more effective use of the property.
Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,
Natasha Lawrence
11696 207th St. W. #8112, Lakeville, MN 55044
651-329-6783/ tashalawrence 1 @yahoo.com
NW
""I", A311VA
SZTSS N14 '/-qP--AN
Obi .11 5 '.A"a __.-D LOL
NIVOMNVD-ow S3WOH'WOISn3 3AIIV3113
AMins :10 31V31=1111133
N(
a
29
zi
4_.� z i im i:�H ;iz
I i I MUM! 1
>
Ng
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
-------------- ------------------
; r
AW
i
N, H 2 or
--------------- —
I
L E I
R
L---------------------------------- L ------- 4= --- ---
i
ip
i¢ !{ 81T0-VZ-bZ-O£-£T gDbYd1O1 w R4 1
pills Z£b65 NW'h31021I�
3Nb I VIo(ll LL99 I n
`1u EifEl�. �.o
I
I111EA�Ikllklllllllll11E11111i1111
1111Uo
;1
IIIII111Qf
1
1
gI1I1ll111
'��, iiIlllUllllll t�.
----
1]l11111[Iti[13
�� ..... .
Illllllllplll
'Irl:l�'ll
1 1111�1 �
i
[lll�I�IC .
aAA>EA>tr�n
`�'
IIIIIIC
��llllll�i!lIII
III
I
;
�
un;i nm�f�i
ennifnifif�E
�
��IIIf1111111111
I
1
OEM
'
--
�? �
���11��AfA�
IIIVIIIV �IIIIIIIIII
II�I�
...•• � ;
I>llllllllll,y
�I�l�!��� A ,
���_„��
� I�llllllllllk
�
-
II�Illllll
!�
111E
IElllll
If IliEl IIIkf EEllf llillillll
I
�
2g f'nE}�6 �C� p 8II0 bZ bZ O£ £I 13J21Vd 101 �.. ems. f r
g s is gQ£ a dp6'� 'M799 NW'A3lQdI3LL99
3NVI VI[Erg
c
€== er�G i€F€ej 3gEE x- .?n l
`1-------------'yy
i
r �
�
II
r
i
Lam______-___.._____________J
-_- - -_____-____--_.....�.�.�.�-.-..v
___-_--y
I I
9
Yy
�pJ
i
i dal
$�
LIE
D
8iiO-VE-VE-O£-El 13dVd 101O
1—
ii1 �r � 6 M799 NW'A3142iI3
•}F�' rF 3NH1 vi.?nl LL99 , � �
i �lFl C•3iliCe ..nav .xrfe.arse a a xq a > —. > a as al as as sa
C3�
F
�o
i
66
i
Hxt 10-trZ-trZ-OC-CT 13:)ZlVd 101
tll!
m 1i91
M,99 NW'/,3-IQ;dI=l MO-W
3NV1 vi.?nl /-L99
6,11 — I 1 9 as f .1i .� .1 a': N�
LU
LU
m
Z
Lu
ED
>
ILJ
ID
woc
�Wil
vgg
z
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: October 28, 2024 Meeting Type: City Council
Submitted By: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Stacy Stromberg, Planning Manager
Title
Fridley
Ordinance No. 1425, Second Reading to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by Natasha Lawrence to
Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. from R-1, Single -Family to R-3, Multi -Family (Ward 2)
Background
Natasha Lawrence, who is the property owner of the vacant parcel at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E., is requesting
to have the property rezoned from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family. To approve a rezoning there
must be similarly zoned land adjacent to the property. The apartment building property to the west is
zoned R-3, Multi -Family as are the properties to the north; therefore, this request to rezone is consistent
with the zoning on neighboring properties. The plans submitted with this rezoning application are to
construct a duplex on the south end of the property. However, once the property is rezoned to R-3,
Multi -Family, a larger building could be constructed based on the large lot size. Any new building
constructed on the property will need to comply with all code requirements, related to setbacks, parking,
landscape and stormwater treatment and wetland protections. A wetland delineation was completed in
2021, and the submitted map (below) shows the location of existing wetlands on the property. The
locations of the wetlands limit the buildable area of the lot.
A Notice of Public Hearing before the Planning Commission and Fridley City Council (Council) was
published in the September 6, 2024, and September 20, 2024 editions of the City of Fridley's (City)
Official Publication.
The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for ZOA#24-01 at their meeting on September 18, 2024
and recommended approval. The motion carried unanimously.
The Council held a Public Hearing and approved the first reading of the Rezoning Ordinance No. 1425
at their October 14, 2024 meeting, with a modification to the ordinance which requires the filing of a
declaration of restrictive covenants from the property owners that will restrict the use of the property to
a duplex. The declaration has been prepared by the City Attorney and has been sent to the petitioner
for signature. Once signed, the City will file it with the property records at Anoka County. As stated
during the Council meeting on October 14t", the declaration will stay filed on the property and apply to
any future owners.
Vision Statement
We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses.
The Rezoning was approved with the stipulations listed below.
1. All necessary permits shall be obtained prior to construction.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the City's engineering staff
prior to the issuance of any building permits, to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties.
3. The property owner at the time of building permit application shall provide proof that any
existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or
removed.
4. The property owner at the time of building permit application shall pay the required park
dedication fee of $1,500 per dwelling unit.
5. The property owner at the time of building permit application shall pay all water and sewer
connection fees for the new building.
Financial Impact
No financial impact.
Recommendation
Staff recommend the City Council approve the second and final reading of Ordinance No. 1425,
Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by Natasha Lawrence to Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia Lane
N.E. from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family (Ward 2)
Focus on Fridle Strategic Alignment
X Vibrant Neighborhoods & Places Community Identity & Relationship Building
Financial Stability & Commercial Prosperity Public Safety & Environmental Stewardship
Organizational Excellence
Attachments and Other Resources
• Ordinance No. 1425
• Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Vision Statement
We believe Fridley will be a safe, vibrant, friendly and stable home for families and businesses.
Ordinance No. 1425
Amending the Zoning Code of the City of Fridley
The City of Fridley does ordain, after review, examination and staff recommendation the following:
Section 1
That Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated.
Section 2.
The tracts of areas within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley addressed as:
6677 Lucia Lane N.E. and legally described as:
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota
(Torrens Property)
4X411IIs] MI
That upon receiving an executed declaration of restrictive covenants from the property owners
that will restrict the use of the property to a duplex, the Community Development Director, or
their designee is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be
rezoned from Zoning District R-1, Single Family to R-3, General Multiple Units.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley on this 28th day of October 2024.
Scott J. Lund - Mayor
Melissa Moore - City Clerk
Public Hearing: October 14, 2024
First Reading: October 14, 2024
Second Reading: October 28, 2024
Publication:
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ("Declaration"), which is
effective this day of 2024 ("Effective Date"), is made by Natasha
Lawrence and John Lawrence, married to each other ("Declarants").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Declarants are the fee owners of certain real property located at 6677 Lucia
Lane NE, Fridley, Minnesota (PARID 13-30-24-24-0118), legally described on the attached
Exhibit A (the "Restricted Parcel");
WHEREAS, Declarants requested that the City of Fridley rezone the Restricted Parcel from
R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family so that they could construct a duplex on the Restricted
Parcel;
WHEREAS, rezoning the Restricted Parcel to R-2 is not an option due to the lack of R-2
zoned parcels in the vicinity of the Restricted Parcel;
WHEREAS, Declarants have offered to place a restrictive covenant on the Restricted
Parcel so that it may only be used for a duplex;
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to rezone the Restricted Parcel to R-3 on the condition
that the Declarants execute this Declaration and it is recorded against the Restricted Parcel;
WHEREAS, Declarants agree that they may construct only a duplex on the Restricted
Parcel and the Restricted Parcel shall only be operated, occupied, and maintained in compliance
with the restrictions and requirements of the City Code, as amended from time to time, and this
Declaration;
FR520\2\984201.v1
Declarants, for themselves and for their heirs, successors, and assigns, in consideration of
the benefits derived by Declarants in being able to construct a duplex on the Restricted Parcel, and
other good and valuable consideration, hereby agrees and covenants that the Restricted Parcel shall
be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, assigned and used subject to the following covenants,
conditions and restrictions, and which covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall run with, the
land and be binding on all parties having any right, title or interest in the Restricted Parcel or any
part thereof, their heirs, successors, and assigns.
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
1. Use Restriction. To comply with the conditions of the City rezoning the Restricted
Parcel to R-3, Declarants hereby impose the following restrictions on the Restricted Parcel:
a. Only a duplex may be constructed on the Restricted Parcel; and
b. The Restricted Parcel shall not be subdivided.
2. Covenant Runs with the Land. The use restriction imposed by this instrument
constitutes a covenant running with the land and, as such, is binding upon the owners of the Restricted
Parcel and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns.
3. City Consent. These covenants run in favor of the City. This Declaration may not be
amended or released from the Restricted Parcel without the written consent of the City, which writing
must be properly recorded or filed in the office of the Anoka County Registrar of Titles.
4. Enforcement. Enforcement of these covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be by
any proceeding at law or in equity by the City against any person or persons violating or attempting
to violate these covenants, conditions or restrictions either to enforce or abate/restrain violation or to
recover damages. Failure by the City to enforce these covenants, conditions or restrictions herein
contained shall in not event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. The City is hereby
specifically granted the right to seek specific performance for any violation of these covenants,
conditions and restrictions, it being agreed by Declarants that damages are not an adequate remedy.
In addition, the City shall be entitled to be awarded injunctive relief without the necessity of posting
security. In the event of any litigation to enforce or restrain violation or interpret the terms hereof,
the court shall have the authority to award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the City.
5. Governing Law. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern the interpretation,
validity, performance, and enforcement of this Declaration.
6. Severability. If any provision of this instrument is invalid, illegal or incapable of being
enforced by any law or public policy, all other provisions of this Declaration will remain in full force
and effect.
7. Recitals and Exhibits. The recitals set forth above are incorporated and made part of
this Declaration.
FR520\2\984201.v 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarants have caused this Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants to be executed on the Effective Date as first above written.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
DECLARANTS:
By:
Natasha Lawrence
By:
John Lawrence
ss.:
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of 2024, by
Natasha Lawrence and John Lawrence married to each other, Declarants.
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL
THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street, Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
FR520\2\984201.v1
SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Restricted Parcel
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
FR520\2\984201.v1
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT'S
THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ("Declaration'), which is
effective this 16411 day of 0 pV e.j,' 2024 ("Effective Date'), is made by Natasha
Lawrence and John Lawrence, married to each other ("Declarants").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Declarants are the fee owners of certain real property located at 6677 Lucia
Lane NE, Fridley, Minnesota (PARID 13-30-24-24-0118), legally described on the attached
Exhibit A (the "Restricted Parcel");
WHEREAS, Declarants requested that the City ofFridley rezone the Restricted Parcel from
R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family so that they could construct a duplex on the Restricted
Parcel;
WHEREAS, rezoning the Restricted Parcel to R-2 is not an option due to the lack of R-2
zoned parcels in the vicinity of the Restricted Parcel;
WHEREAS, Declarants have offered to place a restrictive covenant on the Restricted
Parcel so that it may only be used for a duplex;
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to rezone the Restricted Parcel to R-3 on the condition
that the Declarants execute this Declaration and it is recorded against the Restricted Parcel;
WHEREAS, Declarants agree that they may construct only a duplex on the Restricted
Parcel and the Restricted Parcel shall only be operated, occupied, and maintained in compliance
with the restrictions and requirements of the City Code, as amended from time to time, and this
Declaration;
FR520\2\984201.v1
Declarants, for themselves and for their heirs, successors, and assigns, in consideration of
the benefits derived by Declarants in being able to construct a duplex on the Restricted Parcel, and
other good and valuable consideration, hereby agrees and covenants that the Restricted Parcel shall
be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, assigned and used subject to the following covenants,
conditions and restrictions, and which covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall run with, the
land and be binding on all parties having any right, title or interest in the Restricted Parcel or any
part thereof, their heirs, successors, and assigns.
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
1. Use Restriction. To comply with the conditions of the City rezoning the Restricted
Parcel to R-3, Declarants hereby impose the following restrictions on the Restricted Parcel:
a. Only a duplex may be constructed on the Restricted Parcel; and
b. The Restricted Parcel shall not be subdivided.
2. Covenant Runs with the Land. The use restriction imposed by this instrument
constitutes a covenant running with the land and, as such, is binding upon the owners ofthe Restricted
Parcel and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns.
3. City . These covenants run in favor of the City. This Declaration may not be
amended or released from the Restricted Parcel without the written consent ofthe City, which writing
must be properly recorded or filed in the office of the Anoka County Registrar of Titles.
4. Enforcement. Enforcement of these covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be by
any proceeding at law or in equity by the City against any person or persons violating or attempting
to violate these covenants, conditions or restrictions either to enforce or abate/restrain violation or to
recover damages. Failure by the City to enforce these covenants, conditions or restrictions herein
contained shall in not event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. The City is hereby
specifically granted the right to seek specific performance for any violation of these covenants,
conditions and restrictions, it being agreed by Declarants that damages are not an adequate remedy.
In addition, the City shall be entitled to be awarded injunctive relief without the necessity of posting
security. In the event of any litigation to enforce or restrain violation or interpret the terms hereof,
the court shall have the authority to award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the City.
5. Governing Law. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern the interpretation,
validity, performance, and enforcement of this Declaration.
6. Severabilitti,. If any provision of this instrument is invalid, illegal or incapable of being
enforced by any law or public policy, all other provisions of this Declaration will remain in full force
and effect.
7. Recitals and Exhibits. The recitals set forth above are incorporated and made part of
this Declaration.
FR520\2\984201.v1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarants have caused this Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants to be executed on the Effective Date as first above written.
DECLARANTS:
By: xt
Natasha Lawrence
By:
In Lawrence
STATE OF MRSNESOTA
} ss.:
COUNTY OF
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this —Q—�* day of W02SX, 2024, by
Natasha Lawrence and John Lawrence married to each other, Declarants.
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL
AS EMMA SANTA
�+�+��- NOfAli1'PUBLIC•MINNESOA
IAY CLM±LM1S ;�pti F]r�5 �lI31 /&
THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street, Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612)337-9300
:546NATLJRE OF PFR ON TAKING ACKNOWL : GMEN'T
FR520\2\984201.v1
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Restricted Parcel
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
FR520\2\984201.v1
Ordinance No. 1425
Amending the Zoning Code of the City of Fridley
The City of Fridley does ordain, after review, examination and staff recommendation the following:
Section 1.
That Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated.
Section 2.
The tracts of areas within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley addressed as:
6677 Lucia Lane N.E. and legally described as:
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota
(Torrens Property)
SECTION 3.
That upon receiving an executed declaration of restrictive covenants from the property owners
that will restrict the use of the property to a duplex, the Community Development Director, or
their designee is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be
rezoned from Zoning District R-1, Single Family to R-3, General Multiple Units.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley on this 28' day of October 2024.
�Zki.
��
Scott J. Lund - Mayor
Melissa Moore - City Clerk
Public Hearing: October 14, 2024
First Reading: October 14, 2024
Second Reading: October 28, 2024
Publication: November 1, 2024
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes Page 3
20. Resolution No. 2024-150, Approving a One -Time Rental Fee Waiver at Moore Lake Community
Building for Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO).
Licenses
21. Resolution No. 2024-141, Approving Massage Therapy Individual License.
22. Resolution No. 2024-142, Approving Temporary Gambling Permit for Twin Cities Trout Unlimited,
Claims
23. Resolutior)INo. 2024-138 Approving Claims for the Period Ending October 9, 2024.
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda —15 minutes.)
No one from the audience spoke.
Public Hearing(s)
24. Ordinance No. 1425, Public Hearing and First Reading to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by
Natasha Lawrence to Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. from R-1, Single Family, to R-3,
Multi -Family (Ward 2)
Motion made by Councilmember Evanson to open the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilmember Ostwald.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Lund noted that there will be one presentation for the dual public hearing items related to this
case.
Stacy Stromberg, Planning Manager, stated that she would be presenting the rezoning and
Comprehensive Plan amendment requests at this time, although they will be separate actions. She
stated that the property owner is requesting a rezoning of the property from R-1 to R-3 to allow the
construction of a duplex. A Comprehensive Plan amendment is also needed to change the future
land use from single-family residential to multi -family residential. She reviewed the site description
and history along with an analysis of the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment requests.
She stated that the Planning Commission reviewed the requests at its meeting on September 1811
providing a summary of that discussion and recommendation for approval of the rezoning and
Comprehensive Plan amendment. She asked that the Council hold the public hearing and consider
approval of the two actions requested tonight as presented.
Councilmember Evanson asked if R-2 would be the alternative if there were no issues with spot zoning.
Ms. Stromberg stated that there is an R-2 zoning but because there are no other R-2 properties in
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes Page 4
this area, staff recommended R-3 zoning. She recognized concerns that something larger could be
constructed but noted that the petitioner has never eluded to anything other than a duplex. She
confirmed that only two units could be constructed under R-2.
Councilmember Ostwald referenced the statement that wetlands could not be impacted and asked
for more information on how that would be enforced. Ms. Stromberg stated that the Rice Creek
Watershed would be the authority for wetland activity. She stated that currently there are no wetland
impacts proposed and therefore if the plans changed, new approval would be needed. She stated
that in her time in Fridley, there has not been a wetland filled and every development has had to
develop around the wetland.
Mayor Lund asked for more information on the size of the wetlands, as credits can be purchased to
fill a wetland. He recognized that residents do not want to see R-3 zoning because of the potential
for a larger building to be constructed. He noted that another option would be to stay in R-1 zoning,
allow a lot split and two homes to be constructed instead of a duplex. He recognized that there were
already issues in the neighborhood because of the university. Ms. Stromberg replied that there are
criteria that need to be met in order to purchase credits. She stated that because Fridley has had little
development that has impacted wetlands over the last 25 years, she did not fear that would be the
case.
Mayor Lund stated that he would like to have something in writing from the property owner stating
that an apartment building would not be constructed, but recognized that the property could be sold
to another entity after the rezoning occurs.
Councilmember Evanson referenced the parcel to the south, 6663, which is not an owner -occupied
property and asked the status of that property. Ms. Stromberg stated that the property was
subdivided in 2018 to create three lots, and someone is living in that property to the south but was
unsure if it was a rental. He asked what would stop someone from purchasing that property as well
to make a larger property for development. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director,
commented that the fear is always bigger than the reality. He stated that a very large portion of the
developable land area is wetland and therefore it would be an expensive process to mitigate those
wetlands. He stated that there is also a high water table and therefore there is not a great likelihood
of putting parking under the building, and without sufficient parking, you could not put a large
building on the property. He stated that if the Comprehensive Plan stated that there was an intention
to place R-2 between R-1 and R-3, that would then be a tool the City could use but because the City
has not done that, it would result in spot zoning.
Mayor Lund recognized that it would be costly to change the land to support more development, but
it could be done. He stated that in order to change the zoning to R-3 he would need some assurance
beyond verbal commitments as plans can change.
Natasha Lawrence, applicant, stated that they are just trying to build a duplex and did not believe this
would be such a big issue as when they looked into the property Anoka County stated that one to
three units could be constructed. She stated that when they reached out to City staff, they were
informed that only a single-family home could be constructed.
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes Page 5
Mr. Lawrence stated that when they were here previously, they were happy because they were going
to build a home on the lot, saving trees and protecting the wetlands.
Mrs. Lawrence stated that they were ready to move forward but the bank did not support that plan.
She stated that the builder then proposed a duplex which would allow them to get some of the
income back. She stated that the Rice Creek Watershed stated that only ten percent of the trees could
be removed from the property and they cannot build on wetlands, so that constrains what could be
built on the property.
Mr. Lawrence commented that they are homeowners and not developers. He recognized that in ten
years someone could purchase multiple properties, demolish everything and building something
larger. He stated that they have lived in the neighborhood since 2013, their daughter goes to the
Spanish immersion school down the road, and they look forward to staying in the community. He
stated that this has been a heartbreaking emotional rollercoaster, and they have worked with City
staff to try to find an option and follow the rules. He stated that they do not object to R-2, and they
would be willing to sign something saying they would only construct a duplex. He stated that they
are just people looking to build a home.
Mrs. Lawrence asked if the Council could just move forward with R-2 zoning. Mayor Lund explained
that spot zoning is not a City regulation but a State regulation. Sarah Sonsalla, City Attorney, stated
that if they were to go through R-2 they would need to redo the entire review process. She stated
that she would find R-2 to be consistent with the other uses of R-1 and R-3, but noted that there is
no R-2 adjacent. She stated that the applicants volunteered to sign something stating that they would
only build a duplex and noted that a restrictive covenant could be placed on the property stating that
only a duplex could be constructed.
Mrs. Lawrence stated that they would be happy to sign that statement.
Ms. Sonsalla stated that the City cannot impose that upon the property owners, but they have
voluntarily stated that they would sign something to that effect. She stated that it could then become
a condition in the resolution that the rezoning would not be effective until that declaration is made
on the property.
Councilmember Evanson asked how long that would stay with the property and whether that would
continue to be a condition if the property changed ownership. Ms. Sonsalla confirmed that the
declaration would remain on the property should be ownership change and only a duplex or single
residence could be constructed.
Mayor Lund clarified that if the property owner is willing and volunteering, they could sign the
declaration against the property to limit what could be built on the property.
Wally Wysopal, City Manager, asked Ms. Sonsalla to clarify that type of process. Ms. Sonsalla
explained that a condition would be added to the rezoning resolution stating that the applicants must
agree that a declaration be filed against the property, suitable to the City Attorney, to restrict the
development of the property to a single-family or duplex residence.
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes Page 6
Mayor Lund invited the public to address the Council.
Tom Makozak commented that the R-3 properties in this area already do not appear to be properly
zoned and did not believe that additional R-3 zoning is wanted. Mayor Lund clarified that this area
could have all been zoned R-3 at one time and was then broken up. Mr. Makozak commented that
the residents on Lucia Lane have concerns with the increased traffic of the university for the past
decade and with the completion of the cul-de-sac they finally are seeing less traffic. He stated that if
the property were rezoned R-3 that could be a 40-unit apartment building which would only bring
that traffic problem back. Mayor Lund noted the wetlands and constraints of the site which would
not allow a large apartment building to be constructed. Mr. Makozak stated that if the declaration is
not placed on the property, the concern would be that the ultimate use could change, and an
apartment could be constructed. Mayor Lund noted that the property owner has stated that they are
willing to sign the declaration. Mr. Makozak commented that he would be fine with the duplex as
long as the declaration is signed that would restrict anything larger from being built.
Fay Makozak stated that she was at the Planning Commission meeting when the Lawrences stated
that they would not be living in the home and would be renting it out. She stated that the address
on the application for the Lawrences is in Lakeville. She stated that the property to the south
mentioned earlier is a leased property and therefore could be purchased to add to the size of the
development.
Adam Betker, 6600 Lucia Lane, thanked the Mayor and Council for the new road and cul-de-sac as
that has vastly improved traffic. He stated that he came into the meeting objecting to the request
because he believed a larger apartment could be built. He stated that if the declaration were put on
the property he would not object to the duplex and would welcome another family into the
neighborhood.
Pam Reynolds, 1241 Norton, referenced the properties to the north which are listed as R-3 but used
as R-1, therefore this property would not be adjacent to R-3. She stated that the larger zoning map
shows the predominant zoning of the area to be R-1 and therefore the existing apartment building
does not support a change to R-3. She referenced the statement that underground parking would
not be supported on the property but recalled apartments that built at grade parking and bermed it
to appear as underground parking. Mr. Hickok stated that R-3 zoning allows construction of R-1, R-
2 or R-3, therefore people can build a single-family home on R-3 but that does not change the
underlying zoning. He stated that roadways are often the distinction between different zoning
districts and therefore adjacent means properties that touch.
Sarah Schriner voiced strong opposition to the zoning change. She stated that for the past eight
years, the residents of Lucia Lane have worked with the City to increase the quality of life in their
neighborhood, which was achieved by construction of the cul-de-sac. She stated that changing the
zoning to R-3 would open the door for a 40-unit apartment building which would compromise the
safety and well-being of the residents. She asked the Council to listen to the concerns of the residents.
John Vartis, Lucia Lane, stated that the City has done a great thing with the cul-de-sac and did not
want to see a new problem created, allowing a larger development in the future. He stated that if
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes Page 7
there could be a condition that only a duplex could be built, that would be a welcome addition to the
neighborhood.
Dan Christianson, 6640 Lucia Lane, stated that he also had strong concerns about this and thanked
the City for the cul-de-sac and paving this year. He stated that his biggest concern was that the plan
is approved for a duplex, and something changes in the future allowing something bigger to be built.
He stated that if the declaration is binding and cannot be changed, he would then support a duplex.
Mayor Lund stated that this Council has listened to the people and is happy to hear that a number of
the neighbors who live on the street seem to be okay with the duplex, with the additional assurance
of the declaration. He stated that the Council had the same concern, and it appears that the
declaration would work to provide that assurance.
Councilmember Evanson stated that he represents this ward and is well aware of the traffic concerns
of Lucia Lane. He asked for additional input from the City Attorney related to the declaration that
would limit construction to a duplex, as most residents who spoke stated that they could support a
duplex under those conditions. Ms. Sonsalla stated that this is the first reading of the ordinance and
therefore would come back to the Council for the second reading and adoption. She provided the
specific condition that she would add related to the declaration.
Mayor Lund reiterated that this is the first reading and if there are additional tweaks necessary, that
could be done prior to the second reading. He noted that the language proposed tonight will be a
part of the second reading and included in the Council packet.
Motion made by Councilmember Evanson to close the public hearing, Seconded by Councilmember
Bolkcom.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
25. Public Hearing and Resolution No. 2024-135, Adopting the Assessment for 2024 Street
Rehabilitation Project No. ST-2024-01
Motion made by Councilmember Bolkcom to open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember
Ti II berry.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
Joe Starks, Finance Director, provided background information on special assessments and the related
process that the City has followed. He summarized the street project that was completed, elements
of the project that are not included in the assessment, and remaining project elements. He reviewed
details of the proposed assessment roll, payment options and repayment schedule, and deferment
opportunity. He asked the Council to hold the public hearing and accept any input from residents
and then consider adoption of the resolution as presented.
Mayor Lund invited residents to provide input.
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes Page 8
Pam Reynolds, 1241 Norton, provided written correspondence to Mayor Lund that she then read
aloud. She did not understand how her property could be assessed in the amount of $3,350 and
objected to the assessment amount and calculation process in general. She noted different
assessment rates for the properties along Norton and in other project areas.
Motion made by Councilmember Tillberry to accept the written correspondence from Ms. Reynolds
into the record, Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
Brandon Brodhag, Assistant City Engineer, stated that there are two different types of housing and
assessment formulas. He stated that NLDR is based off front footage and LDR is based on single-
family homes, noting that frontage and driveways are not factored in for LDR. He explained that LDR
then splits the total assessment by the number of units within that project area. Mayor Lund stated
that residential areas pay equal shares as everyone is using the street equally.
Ms. Reynolds commented that a residential property with double the frontage of her property would
receive twice the benefit that she would and therefore should have a higher assessment. Mayor Lund
stated that different formulas are used for different types of projects and single-family assessment is
not based on frontage. He stated that single-family residential properties equally share the
assessment because each person uses the road and benefits from it the same. Ms. Sonsalla provided
additional information on the assessment amount and related benefit to the property. She stated
that it is presumed that there is a benefit, and it is up to those contesting the assessment to bring
forth evidence about how the benefit to the property does not equate to the assessment amount.
Mayor Lund referenced the assessment policy of the City, to assess a certain portion of the street
projects to adjacent property owners. He asked why different rates are assigned to duplexes and
townhomes. 'Mr. Brodhag stated that the City has followed this process since its adoption in 2006.
He stated that he is unsure why there was a distinction between a single-family home and duplex. He
explained how the single-family, duplex and townhome, and apartment rates were calculated for the
project. He offered to email the policy language related to the formula to Ms. Reynolds.
Sarah Kuntz, 1225 65" Avenue, submitted her objection to the assessment. She stated that the City
tore up her road because there were errors made by the engineer when the project was last
completed. She stated that she asked for something other than grass or sod in the corner to assist
with drainage concerns and seed was laid. She did not believe that grass would hold up in that
easement because of the drainage issues. She stated that her neighbor actually benefits from the
project, as their driveway was flooding, and is not included in the assessment. Mr. Brodhag stated
that the neighbor was assessed with the 2008 street project, whereas Ms. Kuntz was not assessed as
part of that project and was assessed with this project. He described the elements that were added
to address the issues with drainage. He stated that they can look at plantings in the future but for
the time being the intention was just to create ground cover.
Motion made by Councilmember Tillberry to enter into the record the written correspondence from
Ms. Kuntz, Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes gage 9
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
Motion made by Councilmember Ostwald to close the public hearing, Seconded by Councilmember
Evanson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
Motion made by Councilmember Evanson to adopt Resolution No. 2024-135, Adopting the
Assessment for 2024 Street Rehabilitation Project No. ST 024-01. Seconded by Councilmember
Ostwald.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
New Business
26. Resolution No. 2024-143, Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Change the Future
Land Use Designation from SFR — Single Family Residential to MFR — Multi Family Residential for
the Land Generally Located at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. and to Authorize Staff to Submit a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Same to the Metropolitan Council (Ward 2)
Ms. Stromberg stated that this item was included in the previous presentation for the property at
6677 Lucia Lane N.E.
Motion made by Councilmember Evanson to approve Resolution No. 2024-143 Approving a
Comprehensive Plan Amendm -nt to Change the Future Land Use Designation from SFR — Single
Family Residential to MFR — ulti Family Residential for the Land Generally Located at 6677 Lucia
Lane N.E. and to Authorize aff to Submit a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Same to the
Metropolitan Council (War 2), conditional upon a declaration or restrictive covenant that reassures
restricting the property to e utilized only for a single-family residence or duplex be filed against the
property in a form accep able to the City Attorney. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
Upon a voice vote,/all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearing(s) (Continued)
24. Ordinance No. 1425, Public Hearing and First Reading to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by
Natasha Lawrence to Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. from R-1, Single Family, to R-3,
Multi -Family (Ward 2) (Continued)
Motion made by Councilmember Evanson, to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 1425,
Rezoning ZOA #24-01 to Rezone Property at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. from R-1 Single -Family to R-3
Multi -Family (Ward 2) conditional upon a declaration or restrictive covenant that reassures restricting
the property to be utilized only for a single-family residence or duplex be filed against the property
in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Seconded by Councilmember Ostwald.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
City Council Meeting 10/14/2024 Minutes Pase 10
Mr. Vartis asked if this covenant would prevent this property from becoming a parking lot. Ms.
Sonsalla did not believe a lot could be used as a standalone parking lot. Councilmember Evanson
stated that it is his understanding that this would restrict the use to a single-family home or duplex.
Mr. Hickok commented that the covenant would restrict that activity. He stated that without the
declaration the property could be purchased by the university and used as a parking lot.
New Business (Continued)
27. Resolution No. 2024-145, App oving a Change Order No. 1 for the 2024 Neighborhood Parks
Improvement Project No. 24-70 7
Mr. Brodhag provided background inf&mation on the 2024 Neighborhood Parks Improvement
Project and reviewed the different elements of the proposed change order. He stated that staff
recommends approval of the resolution as pr ented.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the park proje are almost completed and whether there would
be additional costs anticipated. Mr. Brodhag rep ed that the projects are close to completion, with
fencing being completed within the next week anythen punch list items. He did not anticipate any
additional change orders coming forward.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she has received comments from residents that the Logan Park
sign is boring. Mayor Lund stated that is the same sig�design as the other parks that have been
improved.
Motion made by Councilmember Ostwald to approve Resolution No. 2024-145, Approving a Change
Order No. 1 for the 2024 Neighborhood Parks Improvement Project No. 24-70457. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
28. Resolution No. 2024-140, Approving Temporary Liquor License for Springbrook Nature Center
Foundation
Mr. Wysopal stated that this would have been on the Consent Agenda, but because the petitioner is
related to a Councilmember, it was placed on the Regular Agenda to allow, that member to abstain.
Motion made by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve Resolution No.' 2024-140, Approving
Temporary Liquor License for Springbrook Nature Center Foundation. Seconded by
Councilmember Ostwald.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously. (Tillberry
abstained)
Informal Status Report
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ("Declaration"), which is
effective this �Z5111 day of 0C+610 Lf� 2024 ("Effective Date"),' is made by Natasha
Lawrence and John Lawrence, married to each other ("Declarants").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Declarants are the fee owners of certain real property located at 6677 Lucia
Lane NE, Fridley, Minnesota (PARID 13-30-24-24-0118), legally described on the attached
Exhibit A (the "Restricted Parcel");
WHEREAS, Declarants requested that the City of Fridley rezone the Restricted Parcel from
R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi. -Family so that they could construct a duplex on the Restricted
Parcel;
WHEREAS, rezoning the Restricted Parcel to R-2 is not an option due to the lack of R-2
zoned parcels in the vicinity of the Restricted Parcel;
WHEREAS, Declarants have offered to place a restrictive covenant on the Restricted
Parcel so that it may only be used for a duplex;
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to rezone the Restricted Parcel to R-3 on the condition
that the Declarants execute this Declaration and it is recorded against the Restricted Parcel;
WHEREAS, Declarants agree that they may construct only a duplex on the Restricted
Parcel and the Restricted Parcel shall only be operated, occupied, and maintained in compliance
with the restrictions and requirements of the City Code, as amended from time to time, and this
Declaration;
FR520U\984201.v1
Declarants, for themselves and for their heirs, successors, and assigns, in consideration of
the benefits derived by Declarants in being able to construct a duplex on the Restricted Parcel, and
other good and valuable consideration, hereby agrees and covenants that the Restricted Parcel shall
be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, assigned and used subject to the following covenants,
conditions and restrictions, and which covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall run with, the
land and be binding on all parties having any right, title or interest in the Restricted Parcel or any
part thereof, their heirs, successors, and assigns.
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
1. Use Restriction. To comply with the conditions of the City rezoning the Restricted
Parcel to R-3, Declarants hereby impose the following restrictions on the Restricted Parcel:
a. Only a duplex may be constructed on the Restricted Parcel; and
b. The Restricted Parcel shall not be subdivided.
2. Covenant Runs with the Land. The use restriction imposed by this instrument
constitutes a covenant running with the land and, as such, is binding upon the owners ofthe Restricted
Parcel and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns.
3. City Consent. These covenants run in favor of the City. This Declaration may not be
amended or released from the Restricted Parcel without the written consent of the City, which writing
must be properly recorded or filed in the office of the Anoka County Registrar of Titles.
4. Enforcement. Enforcement of these covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be by
any proceeding at law or in equity by the City against any person or persons violating or attempting
to violate these covenants, conditions or restrictions either to enforce or abatelrestrain violation or to
recover damages. Failure by the City to enforce these covenants, conditions or restrictions herein
contained shall in not event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. The City is hereby
specifically granted the right to seek specific performance for any violation of these covenants,
conditions and restrictions, it being agreed by Declarants that damages are not an adequate remedy.
In addition, the City shall be entitled to be awarded injunctive relief without the necessity of posting
security. In the event of any litigation to enforce or restrain violation or interpret the terms hereof,
the court shall have the authority to award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the City.
5. Governing Law. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern the interpretation,
validity, performance, and enforcement of this Declaration.
6. Severability. If any provision of this instrument is invalid, illegal or incapable of being
enforced by any law or public policy, all other provisions of this Declaration will remain in full force
and effect.
7. Recitals and Exhibits. The recitals set forth above are incorporated and made part of
this Declaration.
FR520\2\984201.v1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarants have caused this Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants to be executed on the Effective Date as first above written.
DECLARANTS:
By: X2 &Ato-� ���
Natasha Lawrence
By: 41kN ' _
Jdhn Lawrence
STATE OF MINNESOTA
} ss.:
COUNTY OF
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day ofam2m1 2024, by
Natasha Lawrence and John Lawrence married to each other, Declarants.
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL
AM EMMA aWA
rrca.'s oi�+�
THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street, Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612)337-9300
RIFT1 Kul -51 ! 1
FR520121984201.v1
EXIIBIT A
Legal Description of the Restricted Parcel
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
FR520\2\984201.v1
City Council Meeting 10/28/2024 Minutes Page 2
4. Receive the Minutes from the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission (EQEC) Meeting of
September 10, 2024.
5. Receive the Minutes from the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of September 3, 2024.
6. Receive the Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting of October 16, 2024.
New Business
7. Resolution No. 2024-157, Approving Gifts, Donations and Sponsorships Received Between
September 16, 2024 and October 18, 2024.
Claims 1
8. Resolution No. 2024-152 Approving Claims for the Period Ending October 23, 2024.
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda —15 minutes.)
No one from the a4dience spoke.
Motion maly Councilmember Tillberry to adopt the regular agenda. Seconded by Councilmember
Evanson.
Upon a voi�e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
Old Business
9. Ordinance No. 1425, Second Reading to Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by Natasha Lawrence
to Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia Lane N.E. from R-1, Single -Family to R-3, Multi -Family (Ward
2)
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, provided background information on the rezoning
request noting that the Council held the public hearing and approved the first reading on October
14th. He stated that the first reading was approved with a modification that required the filing of a
declaration of restrictive covenants from the property owners that would restrict the use of the
property to a duplex. He stated that the document had been signed by the property owner and sent
to Anoka County for filing.
City Council Meeting 10/28/2024 Minutes Page 3
John Vardis, 6546 Lucia Lane, asked if there is a copy of the document that is being filed with Anoka
County. Mr. Hickok stated that he does have an original copy of the document and read it into the
record.
Dan Christianson, 6640 Lucia Lane, stated that the declaration spoke of heirs, successors and signees
and asked if that includes the scenario in which the property was sold. He asked if the approval of
the resolution is dependent upon Anoka County approving the document. Mr. Hickok replied that
sale of the property would be covered under successors and explained that Anoka County will file the
document upon request of the City and does not actually approve anything on its own.
Councilmember Ostwald noted that a copy of the document was included in the agenda packet which
is available on the City website.
Motion made by Councilmember Evanson to approve the second and final reading of Ordinance No.
1425, Consider a Rezoning, ZOA #24-01, by Natasha Lawrence to Rezone the Property at 6677 Lucia
Lane N.E. from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family (Ward 2). Seconded by Councilmember
Bolkcom.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lund declared the motion carried unanimously.
New Bus'ness
10. Resolut.an No. 2024-151, Awarding Trunk Highway 47 (University Avenue) Lighting Project
1
Jim Kosluchar,'City Engineer, provided background information as well as information on the existing
conditions, grant funds received through the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program, project
elements, and loc tion plan. He reviewed other project considerations and details of the project
bidding. He review d the tentative project schedule and next steps stating that staff recommends
approval of the resold 'on as presented.
Councilmember Bolkcom thanked staff noting that it will be incredible to have this lighting as she
often receives comments about how dark it is.
Motion made by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve Resolution No. 2024-151, Awarding Trunk
Highway 47 (University Avenue) Lighting Project. Seconded by Councilmember Tillberry.
Further discussion: Mayor Lund acknowledged that this concept began in 2019 and has now gained
funding and is coming to fruition.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Lulho declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. Resolution No. 2024-155, Approving Hemp THC Product Shop License
Beth Kondrick, Deputy City Clerk, provided background information on Chapter 310 of the Code,
which was established in 2023. She stated that an application was received from Uniflora Holistics for
the final Hemp THC Products Shop License at the locatian of 7331 Baker Street. She reviewed the
Document No.: 620969.004 TORRENS
11/04/2024 12:52 PM
Fees/Taxes In the Amount of: $46.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF FRIDLEY
In the Matter of: A Rezoning, ZOA # 24-01
Owner: John & Natasha Lawrence
Pamela J. LeBlanc
Anoka Cty Property Records and Taxation
Property Tax Administrator and
Retarder/Registrar of Titles
Deputy: jtoneill
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
REZONING
The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 28th day of
October 2024, on a petition for a rezoning pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following
described property:
To rezone the property from R-1, Single Family to R-3, Multi -Family to allow the construction of a
duplex, generally located at 6677 Lucia Lane NE, legal description is in Ordinance 1425.
IT IS ORDERED that a rezoning be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons:
Approval with no stipulations. See Ordinance No. 1425,
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF FRIDLEY )
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, Melissa Moore, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I
have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a rezoning with the original record thereof preserved in
my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the
County of Anoka on the day of UC_ ►fir- 2024.
DRAFTED BY:
City of Fridley
7071 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Melissa Moore, City Clerk
OF FR1pC,(�
r\'i •a�r�{�TA+ygkO ��
(SEAL)
Ordinance No. 1425
Amending the Zoning Code of the City of Fridley
The City of Fridley does ordain, after review, examination and staff recommendation the following:
Section 1.
That Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated.
Section 2.
The tracts of areas within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley addressed as:
6677 Lucia Lane N.E. and legally described as:
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Valley Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota
(Torrens Property)
SECTION 3.
That upon receiving an executed declaration of restrictive covenants from the property owners
that will restrict the use of the property to a duplex, the Community Development Director, or
their designee is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be
rezoned from Zoning District R-1, Single Family to R-3, General Multiple Units.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley on this 28"' day of October 2024.
Scott J. Lund - Mayor
Melissa Moore - City Clerk
Public Hearing: October 14, 2024
First Reading: October 14, 2024
Second Reading: October 28, 2024
Publication: November 1, 2024