PL SUBCOM 02/15/1968 - 31056r--
�
, t
�
�
�
PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-
STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING FEBRUARY 15, 1968
PAGE �
ROLL CALL•
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jensen at 7:35 P.M.
Members Present: Schmedeke, Jensen, Albrecht
Members Absent: . Myhra, Nagel
Others Present: Engineering Assistant Darrel Clark
ORDER OF AGENDA:
The Subcommittee decided to take Item ��6 first because the petitioner
was present. The rest of the items would be taken in the opposite order as
written, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1.
1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST• L S. ��68r06, RUTH T. GEDIG: Lots 14 through 18, 53
and 54, Block G, Riverview Heights.
Mrs. Gedig stated that she owns Lots 15 through 18 on Hugo and her house
is on Lots 15 and 16. She plans on selling Lots 53 and 54 but her house is
built practically on the lot line. She is requesting a five foot strip for
additional rear yard.
Member Jensen said the house sets on the back of Lots 15 and 16, and
if she sold lots 53 and 54, except for the requested five feet, he wondered
if it would be possible for her to get the contractor, who would be building,
and have to have a certificate of survey in order to get a building permit,
to verify the location.
„_ Mrs. Gedig was informed �heti� atione f herahouse,rhowsfareitu setofthe
Lots 53 and 54, that he show
h use from the new lot line.
�
:�,:-
�_
0
Mrs. Gedig stated the stakes 8Y$heawasn'tdsurefie�e $he statedi that a
lots, but in the front of the lots, she was informed the cost of a survey
neighbor wanted to buy part of Lot 18, utting the whole thing together,
goes dawn considerably on the second lot. BY p the Subcom�nittee could pro-
she might COmaction regardlessyofetherPlansWforrthe other lot.
ceed to take
seconded by Albrecht, that the Plats & SubdM�ssions-
MpTION by Schmedeke, rove the lot split, L.S. �k68-06,
Streets � Otilities i t�f�°etfeet8in depth, 50 feet in width off the South
Ruth T. GediS� to sp
ts 53 and 54, this to be added to the North end �foY°Lots515 and 16,
end of Lo Waiving certificate of survey
Block G, Riverview Heights,
or
all voting aye, the motion carried
ided that the location of th�ee lots are indicated on the surve
PrOV Upon a voice vo ,
Lots 53 and 54.
unanimously. he should request
Mrs. Gedig
y,Tas told that when the builder gets his lot,
e or to locate her house in relation to the new lot line and t at
the surv Y
Plats & Subs Str & Util Mtg - Feb 15, 1968 Page 2
should be provided for the next Planning Commission meeting on February
29th. The actual measurements to the edge of her house should be shown on the
survey.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST• L S ��68-05, WALTER R. MACIASZEK_ Lots 18-20, 26-28, B1ock 2,
Oak Grove Addition.
The area was checked on the serial map. The question was asked if it were
necessary to ask the petitioner to provide a survey and descriptions. It was
decided that at this level a drawing is sufficient because if changes have to
be made, it will be of less cost to the owner than having a survey changed in
the beginning.
MOTION by Albrecht, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Plats and Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilities Subcommittee reco�nend approval of L.S. ��68-05 by Walter R.
Maciaszek of Lots 18 thru 20, 26 thru 28, Block 2, Oak Grove Addition subject
to certificate of survey for consideration of the Planning Commission, splitting
Lot 27 in half with half going to each of Lots 26 and 28 making two 60 foot
building sites and them the same on Lots 18 and 19, splitting into building
sites of 60 feet each. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST• L S. ��68-04, LARRY DEAN FERGUSON: Lot 21, Block 2, Spring
Lake Park Lakeside.
The Engineering Asaistant produced a street pattern which had been adopted
several years ago. It showed that Lots 20 and 21 will have access on the rear
of the lots. The back half should be red tagged as far as building is concerned
until water and sewer are put in. However, the Subcommittee felt they needed
more information. The garage should also be tied in.
MOTION by Albrecht, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Lot Split request,
L.S. ��68-04, Larry Dean Ferguson, Lot 21, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside,
be continued until March 6, 1968. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting sye, the motion
carried unanimously.
4. LOT SFLIT UEST• L S ��68-02, ARTHUR CHRISTENSON: All of Lots 2 and 3, and
part of Lots 20 and 21, Block 2, Rees,. Addition to Fr�idley Park.
The Engineering Assistant said the location of the land is North of the
telephone building. The rear (Westerly line) is one foot from the old City
Hall garage which was moved to that property. He said Lots 1 and 2, Block 2,
are zoned C-1 and Lots 3, 4, 19, 20, 21 and 22 are zoned light industrial.
The Professional Building is commercial as well as 1, 2, 3, Block 1, and the
telephone building is light industrial. Lots 2 and 3, the way they are zoned,
are basically impossible to build on, as they would have to maintain a 35 foot
ciearance. They are still under one ownership, but Mr. Christenson wants to
have the split for special assessments for now.
Being the request for the split was in two different types of zoning, the
Subcou�ittee believed this was more of a zoning problem than lot split. If
both lots were zoned the same, there would be no probiem-of setbacks, and if
they approve this lot split, an illegal sideyard would be created,
�
Plats & Subs -Str & Util Mtg - Feb. 15, 1968 Page 3
MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Albrecht, that the Lot Split request,
L.S. ��68-02, Arthur Christenson, of all of Lots 2 and 3 and part of Lots 20
and 21, Block 2, Rees Addition to Fridley Park be continued until March 6,
1968 and ask the petitioner to attend the meeting for further information.
5. LOT SPLIT REQUEST• L.S. ��68-03, JOSEPH ZIZAK: Lots 6 thru 9, Block 27,
Hyde Park Addition.
•_ Me�ber Schmedeke, who lives in that area, asked that, because of a possible
conflict of interest, he would refrain from voting on this request.
The Chairman tabled the item of the Lot Split Request, L.S. ��68-03,
Joseph Zizak of Lots 6 t�rough 9, Block 27, Hyde Park Addition until the
meeting of March 6, 1968 for consideration and study and because of a lack
of a quorum.
6. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT: P.S. ��68-01, AL ROSE ADDITION, ALBERT M. JOHNSON:
Lot 36, Revised Auditor's Subdivision ��23.
Engineering Assistant Clark explained that Mr. Johnson was out of town
and wouldn't be back until after the first of March.
In examining the preliminary drawing, the Subcommittee felt there was
a question about Lot 6, inasmuch as it was not a legal lot. It would be
turned down under our Building Code. They mentioned combining Lots 5 and 6
by moving the lot lines of 4 and 5, making three lots into 2 lots.
MOTION by Albrecht, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Preliminary Plat,
P.S. �k68-01, A1 Rose Addition, Albert M. Johnson of Lot 36, Revised Auditor's
Subdivision No. 23 be tabled for further consideration and stipulation that
Lot 6 must be improved as it is not suitable building site in its present
dimensions. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
7. STREET STUTJY SPECIFICATIONS:
The Chairman felt there should be a complete committee to study this
item, and continued the Street Study Specifications until the next regular
meeting.
ADJOURIVMENT •
There being no further bueiness, Chairman Jensen adjourned the meeting
at 9:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Hazel 0'Brian
Recording Secretary
��