Loading...
PL 08/24/1967 - 7239� � / ` i�yr . < . ...5,./ ,.-'j . .. J.a �.,,. J, .' � _/ . . i .: +I�.i�'�'„r''�� C iCi.� %� / F .L�...'i % f.i � /, � � �J Vi/f�,J 1�.�..IC. ._ __ . : L,/'. 1; f / (� � ., , . . .� . a � , , . - , , , � � � ` o� .:7t. ; ._ ,„,��/� � i� z,; �.. , y � F , ". �• l',..P � �� � � , . - . � �.. , : A G E N D A PLA.NNING CONIMISSION MEETING AUGUST 24, 1967 ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLAI�TNIi1G CONIMISSIO�i MINU�'ES - ATiGUS1 10, 1967 RECETVE BUILDING STAIvDARD-D�SIGN CON'i'ROL M�NCTTES - AUGUST 15, 19�7. REC�IVE BO1�RD OF APPF�LS MIIV'uTES - AUGUST 16, 1967. Ot2DER OF AGENDA : 1. CON'I'INUED DISCUSSION FOR ORDINANCE FOR tTETERINARIAi1 CLINIC: � 2. CONTINU� DISCUSSION OF: "BONDING AI�,TD COn1'TRACTORS" 7:30 P.M. Pages 1-4 Pa.ge 5 Pa.ge 6 f : � _ e , " � � . r , . ���'. � c-t 't i = _ r� ,;,__ � �� , -- _ ..... - . . . , ��t r r �.� % � ;�+.� `C.> , -i :. r .. . .€� ' ` • , �... _f ,_ . .� ._ . . . 4 , .. . .. . ..t 0 0 /�1 � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 10, 1967 ROLL CALL• Page l The meeting was called to order at 7:34 P.M, by Chairman Hug,hes. Members present: Myhra, Je�lsen, Hughes, Ylinen Member absent: Erickson Others present: Acting City Manager Brunsell, City Attorney Herrick, Engineering Assistant Clark APPROVE_MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: JULY 27, 1967: . MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission minutes of July 27, 1967 be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: JULY 26, 1967: MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting of July 26, 1967 be received. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. /'� � RECEIVE MINUTES OF PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING: AUGUST 3, 1967: MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commissinn receive the minutes of the Plats'& Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Sub- committee meeting of August. 3, 1967. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. ORDER OF AGENAA: It was decided that Items 2, 3 and 4 should be discussed in that - order and Items 1 and 5 at the end of the evening. 1. CONTINUED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZOA ��66-16, HAROLD SCHROEDER: ' Bourdeaux s Spring Brook Park Addition. Problem of access from East River Road. Set public hearing date for September 14, 1967. Chairman �iughes said that when this request was before_the Planning Commission on July 27, 1967, questions were raised concerning traffic. This was then turned over to Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities ' Subcotmnittee. They considered the traffic problem at the August 3, 1967 meeting and continued the study to the meeting on August 31st. Mr. 0. Reuben Johnson, representing Buetow.& Associates, and Howard ^ Dumphy were present. The Engineering Assistant Clark informed the Commission that he had called the State Highway Department for additional information and they told him they were swamped and it �aould �e two or three weeks before they could get the information for us. The County Highway Department said Planning Commission Meeting - Augustl0, 1967 Page 2 in 1964, by actual. count, there were 6,000 vehicles a day on East River � Road, and the projected figure for 1985 was 5,000 vehicles. The 1964 figures were tal:en before rerouting of Highway ��10 to University Avenue, and another reason for the reduction in traffic was new cross roads. Mr. Johnson hoped that the Subcommittee could present their final report on the effect of traffic as it relates to their property and the development as a whole at the August 31st meeting inasmuch as the time element is important. He requested that the Public Hearing be scheduled for September 14, 1967, which was consistent with the presentation made at the July 27th Planning Commission meeting. He also suggested that whatever pressure could be brought upon the State Highway Department for their traffic information would be appreciated. MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Co�nission set a public hearing on September 14, 1967 for ZOA 4�66-16, at 8:00 P.M., Harold Schroeder for a Planned Development District of Block 1 and Lots 10 through 12, Block 2, Bourdeaux`s Spring Brook Park Addition, Lots 2 through 9, Block 2, Bourdeaux's Spring Brook Park Addition and , Block 1, Spring Brook Park 2nd Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Engineering Assistant Clark asked that it be noted if the plan is adopted, it would necessitate vacations, although this would be included in the plans. � ^ 2. REZONING'REQUEST: ZOA ��67-08, DALBERG REALTY"FOR THOMAS BRICKNER: Part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, rezoning from R-2 to R-3. Mr. Arne Folstad, representing Dalberg Realty Company and Mr. Thomas Brickner, the applicant, were present. Inasmuch as it has been the practice in the past to suggest to the petitioner of R-3 zoning that he request R-3A, which permits only multiple dwellings, Mr. Brickner was asked if it would be agreeable with him to do so in this case. He answered that it would be all right. Mr. Brickner had plans of the type of buildings proposed, t�ao bedroos� units and one story in the back. He stated the existing house on the land will be removed. Mr. Brickner requested a public hearing for September 14, 1967. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission _ -- set a public hearing date of September 4. 1967 at 7:30 P.M, for the re- zoning request, ZOA ��67-08,�Dalberg Realty for Thomas Brickner, for part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 to rezone from R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (multiple family dwellings only). Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. City Attorney Herrick entered at 8:00 o'clock. ^ 3. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��67-09, FEDERt1L LUMBER COM1'ANY BY SAM P.OSENBAUM, TREASliREP.: Lots 5 thru 8, Lots 25 and 26, Blocl: 2, Commerce Park Additior.. Rezone to CR-2 or M-1. Mr. Sam Rosenbaum and Mr. Louis Segal were gresent. Mr. Rosenbaum Planning Commission rieeting - August 10, 1967 Page 3 stated that either zoning classification would be agreeable with them. Chairman Hughes agreed the problem is to determine what category this ^ applicati.on snould cover. It was suggested the advertisement include both categories which wi11 give more time to study the request. The City Attorney aslced if the agenda included the memorandum he wrote to the Council which would give additional interpretation of lumber yards. . (The agenda did not, but this memo will be sent to the Planning Commis- sion members by mail.) Mr. Herrick continued, I think the question is one of examining the CR-2 Ordinance to determine if a lumber yard of , the type that the applicant is talking about is within your contempla- tion of what could go in CR-2, and whether Mr. Rosenbaum could and want to meet the requirements of CR-2. If you feel that the lumber yard is within the intentions of that zoning, perhaps this is the road to take. If not, then the only other way to permit retail lumber outlet to be built on this land would be to rezone it to M-1. /'� 4. � Mr. Rosenbaum said he understood the application for the public hearing would have both categories. Under CR-2, he would have to request a considerable number of variances; under M-1, the changes would be minimum. Their plot plans include a major retail operation centered and facing University Avenue, distribution and storage further back towards Commerce Lane. East of Commerce Lane the area is now M-1, so as a practical matter, most of their operation would be unloading and storage of lumber and it would be concentrated on Commerce Lane, which is M-1. Mr. SegaT stated they would like to have M-1 in their plans because they would be allowed a little more freedom. In CR-2 variances would have to�be requested. '- MOTTON by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission hold a public hearing bn September 7, 1967 at 7:30 P,M. for ZOA ��67-09, Federal Lumber Company by Sam Rosenbaum of Lots 5 thru 8, Lots 25 and 26, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition to be rezoned as follows: rezone from C-1 (local business) to CR-2 (limited business) Lots 5, 6 and 26, Block 2 or r�zone from C-1 (local business) and CR-2 (limited business) to M-1 (light industrial areas) Lots 5 through 8, 25 and 26, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. " in�smuch as this is a special meeting, the Planning Commission re- quested there be no other item on the agenda. DISCUSSION OF ZONING FOR VETERINARIAN CLINIC: Ordinance draft study. The City Attorney asked for suggestions from the Commission, whether or not to follow the,pattern in the present Code. After discussion with the City Attorney, the Conunission agreed there would be more flexibility using a special use permit to state the minimum qualifications in the ordinance that must be met before a permit is granted: In reviewing the criteria for a v�terinary clinic or animal hospital, the following items were considered: construction of the build- ing, interior and exterior, elimination of noise that would disturb the general neighboriiood, disposal of waste materiai so that there would be no odor, high temperature gas.furnace, air conditioning, separate over- head ventilation system, 8" thick block wall for entire structure, no Planning Commission Meeting - August 10, 1967 Page 4 windows in the rear or double glazed fixed sash (two thicknesses of glass and non-opening), and the zoning categories where it may be ^ permitted. It was suggested that James Hensley, Health Inspector, be consulted regarding the types of incinerators, furnaces and approved models that could be used for disposing of burnable refuse without creating smoke or odor. � The City Attorney stated he wauld have a draft of this ordinance for study at the next meeting on August 24th. ' S. BONDING AND CONTRACTORS: Referred by Council. The City Attorney, in explaining this referral, said he believed this procedure has worked successfully in at least one other community. The purpose is to give the City better control over development, so . that a situation will not arise where the developer is supposed to put in blacktop, shrubbery or special landscaping, and one year later it is still not done. An alternate could be withh�lding certificate of occu- pancy until completion and posting a borid or escrow at the time they are not able to complete it. Chairman Hughes asked to be excused at 9:30 P.M, and turned the meeting over to Member Jensen. The City Attorney asked if this item could be continued until the meeting of August 24th in order to give him more time to get additional information. ^ • .- . Acting Chairman Jensen suggested Councilman Samuelson be asked to attend this meeting. ^ The item "Bonding and Gontractors" was continued until the August 24, 1967 meeting. ADJOURNMENT • MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Ylinen, that the Pianning Commission meeting of August 10, 1967 be adjourned at 9:40 P.M. � Respectfully�submitted, =�7`'��C. �/ �►�,i.� -t,_. Iiaze�- 0'Brian Recording Secretary � ' . � BUILDING STAriD�l?'.DS - DESIG�I CONTROL SUL'CO�L�IITTLE MEETING MINUTF,S, AUGUST 15, 1967 The rfeeting was call.ed to order by Chairman Erickson at 8:09 P.r1. ROLL CALL MEMBEKS PI:ESENT: Erickson, Dittes, Tonco, Hauge � MErIBERS Af3SENT: Biermann � OTHERS PP.ESENT; Building Inspector, Mr. Bob Rote, Erickson Petroleum, Mr. Brad Steinman, Erickson Petroleum, rir. Enos E. Curtis, � McDonald's Corporation, Mr. James Klinefetter, �icDonald's Corporation, Mr. Wi'11iam Jaeger, Kraus��Anderson ', 1, CONSIDEP�ATION OF A iZ�QtTEST FOR A BUILDING PERi�1IT TO PERNIIT CONSTRUCTION OF A CARRY-OUT RESTAUR.ANT ON LOTS 10, 11, 12 AitiTD 13, BLOCK 4, BENNETT-Pt1LMER ADDI- TION (NORTH OF ERICKSON STATION ON UNIVERSITY AVE�tUF) 5831 WiIVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST. REQUEST BY MCDONALD'S SYSTEMS, INC: The foll.owing items were, discussed by the Subcommittee; (A) Lot split discussed contingent on the approval of a permit for McBonald's. (B) The fence behind McDonald's shall be similar as to height and materials to that in existance behind the Erickson Petroleum Station. J'� • � . (C) All a?-eas not shown as planting, building, walks or concrete shall be asphalt pavino. (D) 5' concrete sidewalk to abut west property line on boulevard. (E) Plot plan indicating seediag and planting to be submitted prior to Council meeting of Au�ust 21, 1967. (F) Sign location and size all right for C-2 zoning (This use is C-1 permitted in C-2) (G) Driveways to be 3- 25 foot drives on service drive only. (H) Enclosed rubbish pickup area at northeast property corr.er. MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval with stipulations �A) throuoh (H). Secor.ded by Hauge. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Erickson declared the motion carried. ADJOUR�':IENT • There being no further b��.siness, Chairman Erickson declared thea�eeting adjourned at 9:30 P.NI. ^ Respectfully submitted � . � � � f/� � � Claren etBeli le T� ` {� �"'� n Acting Secretary *_o the Board 0 � THE MINUTES OF THT BOC'1RD OF APP�ALS r�:ETI\TG OF AUGUST 16 , 1967 � The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Ylinen at 7;30 P.M. ROLL CALL MEriBEI�S PF'.F;SE\T: Ylinen, Ahonen, Mittelstadt, b:inish MEMBERS ABSE\TT: Saunders EPTEII�;CE OF THE MINUTES OF TF� JULY 26, 196% MF:ETING: MOTION by riinish to accept the minutes of the July 26, 1967 meeting. The mation was seconded, and there being no nays, Chairman Ylinen declared the motion carried. 1. A RE UEST FOR A VARIAI�TCE FR0�1 SECTION 45.24, CITY CODE OF FRIDLEX, MINNESOTA � 1963, REVISED DECEyLF3ER 31, 196/+, BY TaAIVF.P. OF SIDE YARD REQUIRF�IENT OF 5 FEET TO 3 FEET 7 INCHES TO PBF:�ITT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED GAkAGE ON LOT 8 BLOCK 5, FLOP.ENCE PAPK ADDITION TO FRIDLEY, ANOI:E1 COUNTY, rfIN�IESOTA, SA�'�IE BEING 6340 VAN BUREi� S7�2EET NOP.THEAST, FRIDLEY, rIIN\rESOTA. �RREQUEST BY QUENTI:N R. WATTS, 6340 VAN BUREN STREET NO�THEAST, FRIDLEYt MINNFSOTA 55421)• MOTION by Tlinish to grant the variance as requested as there is 27.7 feet to the next major building and 6 feet to a detached garage, and a petition has been signed by the r.eighbors,,including those taithiz 200 feet of the proposecl garage, with all approving the construction. The riotion was secanded by Mittelstadt, Upon a�voi.ce vote, there being no nays, Chairman ^ Ylinen declared the motion carri.ed. ' 2. A REQUEST FOF A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 45.24, CITY CODE Or FRIDLEY� MINNESOTA � 1963, REVISEn DECEM6ER 31, 1964, BY WAIVER OF SIDE YARD CC�Ri�iER LOT REQUIRE��NT OF 17 z FEET TO 3 FEET TO PERi�fIT C(�vSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED 24 FOOT GAR.AC=E 0`; LOT 1,� BLOCK 2, LYI�DALE BUILDERS 4TH ADDITION Tt� FRIDLFY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, SAl�� BEING 5431 i�IAUISON STREET NORTHFAST, FRIDLF,Y, MI\TNESOTA . _(RE(3L�EST BY D. M, S�o'PNSON, 5431 MADISON STREET NORTHEAST, FRIDI.EY, MINNESOTA 55421 - It was noted that there will be a cul-de-sac and dead-end a short way.fxocr. the proposed garage. Mr. Swanson was present and explained the reason for asking for the request. MOTION by Mittelstadt to approve the variance, only because Cheri Lane is � not to be used as a thoroughfare and is a dead end with the cul-d�-sac being close to the property in question, and a1so, tne neighbors bave signed a petition approving of the building, and the City has an 18 foot bculevard in this area making a total of approximately 21 feet from the propsed garage to the street surfacing. Seconded�by Ahonen. On the motion, those voting in favor, Mittelstadt, Ylinen, Ahonen; voting nay, riinish. Chairman Ylinen declared the motion carried. ADJOUR�fiIENT: There being no further business, Chairman Ylinen declar�d the meeti.ng adjourned at 8;05 P.rf. Respectfully submi.tted, . ��� �t�/Z,�t-��/ �� Ma'r�in C. Brunsel� Secretary to the Board