Loading...
PL 08/10/1967 - 30995� n PLANNING COI�IISSION l�IEETING - AUGUST 1.0, 196? Page 1 ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order at 7:34 P.M, by Chairman Hughes. Members present: Myhra, Jerisen, Hughes, Ylinen Member absent: Erickson Others present: Acting City Manager Brunsell, City Attorney Herrick, Engineering Assistant Clark APPROJE MIPIUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: JULY 27, 1967: PSOTION by Ylinen, seconded by I�yhra, that the Planning Commission minutes of July 27, 1967 be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: JULY 26, 1967: MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the miriutes of the Baard of Appeals meeting of July 26, 1967 be received. Upon a voice vote, all vcting aye, the motion carried. ^ RECEI�TE MINUTES CF PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOIM�'iIITTEE I�ETING: AUGUST 3i 1967: � MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Plats'& Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Sub- com�nittee meeting of August 3, 1967. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. ORDER OF AGENDA: It was decided that Items 2, 3 and 4 should Ue discussed in that order and Items 1 and 5 at the end of the evening. 1. CONTINUED PLANATED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZOA ��66-16, HAROLD SCHROEDER: ' Bourdeaux s Spring Brook Park Addition. Problem of access from East River Road. Set public hearing date for September 14, 1967. Chairman Hughes said that when this request was before the Planning Commissi�n on July 27, 1967, questions were raise.d cancerning traffic. This was then turned over to Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities ' Subc�n�mittee. They considered the traffic problem at the August 3, 1967 meeting and continued the study to tne meeting on August 31st. T4r. O. Reuben Johnson, representing Buetow & Associates, and Howard Dumphy �aere present. The Engiiieering Assistant Clark informed the Commission that he had called the State Highway Department for additional in£ormation and they told him they were swamped and it would be two or three weeks before they could get the information for us. The County liighway Department said Planning Commission Meeting - Augustl0, 19n7 Page 2 in 1964, by actual. count, there were 6,000 vehicles a day on East River ^ Road, and the projected figure for 1985 was 5,0OQ vehicles. The 1964 � figures were taken before rerouting of Highway ��10 to University Avenue, and another reason for the reduction in traffic was new cross roads. Mr. Johnson hoped that the Subcommittee could present their final report on the effect of traffic as it relates to their property and the development as a whole at the August 31st meeting inasmuch as the time element is important. He requested that the Public Hear.ing be scheduled for September 14, 1967, which was consistent with the presentation made at the July 27th Planning Commission meeting. He also suggested that whatever pressure could be brought upon the State Highway Department for their traffic information would be appreciated. . MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission set a public hearing on September 14, 1967 far ZOA ��66-16, at 8:00 P,M., Harold Schroeder for a Planned Development District of Block 1 and Lots 10 through 12, Block 2, Bourdeaux`s Spring Brook Park Addition, Lots 2 through 9, Block 2, Bourdeaux`s Spring Brook Park Addition and . Block 1, Spring Brook Park 2nd Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Engineering Assistant Clark asked that it be noted if the plan is adopted, it weuld necessitate vacations, although this would be included in the plans. � n 2. REZONING'REQUEST: ZOA ��67-08, DALBERG REALTY'FOR TH�S BRICKNER: Part of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, rezoning from R-2 to R-3. Mr. Arne Folstad, representing Dalberg Realty Company and Mr. Thomas Brickner, the applicant, were present. Inasmuch as it has been the practice in the past to suggest to the petitioner of R-3 zoning that he request R-3A, which permits only multiple dwellings, Mr. Brickner was asked if it would be agreeable with him to do so in this case. He answered that it would be all right. Mr. Brickner had plans of the type of buildings proposed, two bedroom units and one story in the back. He stated the existing house on the land will be removed. Mr. Brickner requested a public hearing for September 14, 1967. � MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission set a public hearing date of September 24, 1967 at 7:30 P.M. for the re- zoning request, ZOA �F67-08, Dalberg Realty for Thomas Brickner, for part of Lot 6, Revised Auditvr's Subdivision No. 10 to rezone from R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings) to R-3A (multiple family dwellings only). Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. City Attorney Herrick entered at 8:00 o'clock. � 3. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��67-09, FEDERAL LUMBER COMPANY BY SE1M ROSEN13AtJI�I, _ TREASURER: Lots 5 thru 8, Lots 25.and 26, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition. Rezone to CR=2 or M-1. � Mr. Sam Rosenbaum and Mr. Louis Segal were present. Mr. Rosenbaum n � � r-f Planning Commission Meeting - August 10, 1967 Pa�e 3 stated that either zoning classification would be agreeable with them. Chairman Hughes agreed the proble� is to determine what category this application should cover. It was suggested the advertisement include both categories which will give more time to study the request. �he City Attorney.asked if the agenda included the memorandum he wrote to the Council which would give additional interpretation of lumber yards. (The agenda did not, but this memo will be sent to the Planning Commis- sion members by mail.) Mr. Herrick continued, I think the question is one of examining the CR-2 -0rdinance to determine if a lumber yard of the type that the applicant is talking about is within your contempla- tion of what could go in GR-2, and whether Mr. Rosenbaum could and want to meet the requirements of CR-2. If you feel that the lumber yard is within the intentians of that zoning, perhaps this is the road to take. If not, then the only other way to permit retail lumber outlet to be built on this land would be to rezone it to M-1. Mr. Rosenbaum said he understood the application for the public hearing would have both categories. Under CR-2, he would have to request a considerable number of variances; under M-1, the changes would be minimum. Their plot plans include a major retail operation centered and facing University Avenue, distribution and storage further back towards Commerce Lane. East of Co�nerce Lane the area is now M-1, so as a practical matter, most of their operation would be unloading and storage of lumber and it would be concentrated on Commerce Lane, which is M-1. Mr. Segal stated they would like to have M-1 in their plans because they would be allowed a little more freedom. In CR-2 variances would have to�be requested. '- MOTION by 3ensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning CoBUnission hold a public hearing �n September 7, 1967 at 7:30 P.M. for ZOA ��67-09, Federal Lumber Company by Sam Rosenbaum of Lots 5 thru 8, Lots 25 and 26, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition to be rezoned as follows: rezone from C-1 (local business) to CR-2 (limited business) Lots 5, 6 and 26, Block 2 or rezone from C-1 (local business) and CR-2 (limited business) to M-1 (light industrial areas) Lots S through 8, 25 and 26, Block 2, Commerce. Park Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanixnous ly . " Inasmuch as this is a special meeting, the Planni.ng Commission re- quested there be no other item on the agenda. 4. DISCUSSION OF ZONING F.OR VETERINARIAN CLINIC: Ordinance draft study. The City Attorney asked for suggestions from the Commission, whether or not to follow the,pattern in the present Code. After discussion with the City Attorney, the Commission agreed there wauld be more flexibility using a special use permit to state the minimum qualifications in the ordinance that must be met before a permit is granted. In reviewing the criteria for a veterinary clinic or animal hospital, the following items were considered: construction of�the build- ing, interior and exterior, eiimination of noise that would disturb the generaZ neighborho�d, disposal of waste material sa that there would be no odor, high temperature gas furnace, air conditioning, separate over- head ventilation system, 8" thick blocic wall for entire structure, no Planning C rniunission Meeting - August 10, 1967 Page 4 windows in the rear or double glazed fixed sash (two thicknesses of glass and non-openirig), and_the zoning categories where it may be ^ pe.z-mitted. It �as suggested that James Hensley, Health Inspector, _ be consulted regarding the types of incinerators, furnaces and approved models that could be used for disposing of buxnable refuse without creating smoke or odor. The City Attoxney stated he would have a draft of this ordinance for study at the next meeting on August 24th. 5. BONDING AND CONTP�ICTORS: Referred by Council. The City Attorney, in explaining this referral, said he believed this procedure has worked successfully in at least one other community. The purpose is to give the City better control over development, so . that a situation will not arise where the developer is supposed to put in blacktop, shrubbery or special landscaping, and one year later it is still not done. An alternate could be withholding certificate of occu- pancy until completion and posting a bond or escrow at the time they are not able to complete it. Chairman Hughes asked to be excused at 9:30 P.M, and turned the meeting over to Member Jensen. The City Attorney asked if this item could be continued until the , meeting of Au�ust 24th in order to give him more time to get additional information. nActing Chairman Jensen suggested Councilman Samuelson be asked to attend this meeting. The item "Bonding and Contractors" was continued until the August 24, 1967 meeting. ADJOURNb�NT : MOTION by �iyhra, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Commission meeting of August 10, 1967 be adjourned at 9:40 P.M, 0 � _- � � Respectfully�submitted, : � j � �U j�.--�.=;,_. Haze�I 0'Brian Recording Secretary �'�.._; ,� � . .��, " PLANNING C�+l�iSSI�N MEETING -- AUGUST 10, 1967 -- SIGN TN SHEBT y' . ,i ___.. ,_ ; j _ _ _ . _ � f f _ � % ^ DDRES S '� _--__ _— '-� i � r ; � __ _ . _ _ _ : _ - _ , ,_-7 _ TEM N0. � , � - _ y - �, , : � �� ' -�%•�� :G�.'�--G -�C._�-�c� v n -> _ � ._ „ ��.:�"-..�..' _ — -. � � �- - - _ S��' �' d ��C� � -3 f � �., ��., ✓t ,. !j ' �� ��,_„ �4 � �a�.�� ��, � _ _ __ _ �� �� -�=�� c��-c.� �'�,a,-r.� _ �- ,. _ � " S _ _ _ / _ _ _ i4 _ _ __ _ � , _ _ — - _ __--- - - ---- - -- - - _11_ __ _ __ _. _ . _ _ . _ -- __----- - � _ ___ . - - _ ,f _ __ _ _ ._. � _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ ---- �� _ . _ ;J _ _ � i _ _. _ _ i� _ _ ;�_ , __ _ _ �__ , I, " __ _______ _ �,_ ____ _ _ i _ i! _ _ iI ;f __ _ __ __ _ , � _ _ _ _ _ __ 'i - - __ _ ,i_ ___ _ __ _. ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . __.__ ___ � , _ _ _ __. _ � �, -- _. __ __ _ _ __ -- ,� . _ f _ _______ I i; ,i j� � � - --. _ i� I ___- - _. 1 _ _ _ _ - - - ._ _.___._ ___.__.------ !- _ I-- _ _ . _ _ __ ____ ___ _ _ �� _ _ . _ ��__. --- . . _ } - i_ _ _ . __ ____ _ � - - - ---- --- .._____:._ ._. . . _.. .. ... �A . . ... . .... _ . . . j. . - . __ . _ .. . . . ._. . .. _. ___ '__'... _._ _ _. _ . _ . . .�� -__ _. . . _ _... _ _ . . . _.. .. . _ . . .. . . . . . . . . . . _ . . ... ._ _ _"__ _____.. � I`I —.'__ _'_. ___ ___. _ ' �I __ ".. . _ _ . . . _ .. . . . . . . . .. _ . .. .. .. . _ .. � . . __. _____ . . _. _ _ . .1'. . ... . . . .. _ _ .. .. _ . . _ . . .. . . . _ . _ .._ __—'_—. I . _ . ._. .. .__- __.. _. I . . .. . . ,.. . . _ _ '�k—_ . r I�k':i£ ver_w, -' , . �.i! � _ . .. . s� � . �. . _.