PL 05/23/1968 - 7260'�"'1 .. � .
A G E N D A �
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - MAY 23, 1968 . 7:30 P,M.
.
;� .
ROLL CALL• ' Pages
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTFS: MAY 9, .1.968 , 1-5
RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTE�: MAY 13, 1968 6-7
RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARI�S-DESIGN CONTROL MINUTF�S: MAY'15, 1968 8
ORDEft OF AGENDA: � � .
1. REVIEW OF CHANGES IN PLANNID DEVEI,OPMENT?-�`LOA #66-15 - HAROLD SCHROIDER:
BY CAMCO, IN�`.: JAMES SOLVF�SON:
�, Material available at meetin.g. �
2. CARTER-DAY: APPROVE REGISTEftID LAND SURVEY RLS #68-03:
3. PROPOSID ZONING CODE:
� .
r����w -�
. ��� �
K����
f ~�
�-,
�
�
. .
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEErING MAY 9, 1968 PAGE 1
ROLL CALL:
The Meeting k�as called to order by Chairman Hughes at 7:35 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESEN�': Myhra, Jensen, Hughes, Ylinen, Erickson
OTHERS PRESENT: Darrel Clark, En�ineering Assistant
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 25, 1968
On Pa�e 3, sixth para�-ra-ph, Mr. Erickson called attention to an error
in the wording oi' the motion which should read "Upon a voice vote, Member
Erickson abstaining, the motion caxried."
Chairman Hughes asked that the last sentence on Page 2 be omitted as
it was irrelevant.
On Page 5, the paragxa-�h before the motion, at the request of. Mr.
Erickson, should read, "Mr. Erickson said it seemed to him that rezoning of
this pxopert.y and the question of this type of complex would be an asset to
the communit,y and we should be able to eliminate once and for all the problem
n� of the_ North parcel in question."
MO'i'ION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
approve the mi.nutes of April 25, 1968 subject to the abo�e corrections. Upon
a voice vote,_all voting a,ye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STRFETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMIT'��E MINUTES:
1�.Y 3, 1g68:
Chairman Jensen requested the following corrections be made a.n.d
inco�porated in the minutes: On Page 1 the size of the tract is quoted by
Mr. Siverts as seven_acres. The last two paragraphs on Page 1, where the
letter "D" is used descri.bin a Parcel, this is in error and the letter "�3"
should. be inserted. The MOTION on Pa es 1 and 2 should be corrected as
follows:. "MOTION by Nagel, seco.nded by Schmedeke, that the Plats & Sub-
divisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend a�proval of Lot Split,
L.S. #68-08, as described in map referred to at the Subcommittee meeting of
May 3, 1968, subject to the dedication of the remainin� part of Lot F for
street purposes a.nd also sub'ect to combining Lots B and C into one lot �
labelled C. Upon a voice vote, all voting a e, the motion carried unanimousl.y."
n MOTION by Myhra, seconded b.y Ylinen, tYiat the Planning Commission
receive the mi.nutes of the Flats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities�Subcommittee
meeting of Ma.y 3, 1968 as corrected above. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
the motion carried unanimously. .
Planning Commission Meeting - May 9, 1968 Page 2
. ACCEPT MINUTES OF COMNlTTTEE ON OR.7)IIV�iNCE REVIEW: APRIL 25 1968:
� MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Je.nsen, that the Pla.nni.ng Commission
accept the minutes of the Committee on Ordina.nce Review of April 25, 1968.
Upo.n a voice vote, all voting aye, the motio.n carried u.nanimousl.y.
ORDEft OF AGENDA :
It was noted that the person who would xepresent Item 1 had not
arrived, so that the Commission reversed the order, takin.g I�em 2 first.
1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #68-08, ING T SIVERTS, JR.• Part of Lot 1, Revised
Auditor's Subdivision #10.
Mr. Siverts was present, and he passed revised dxawings to the
members of the Commission. In describing the easement which the State of
Minnesota has in order to reach the dam site, N1x. Siverts said that ,you sta.rt
at County Road H at the 66 foot strip (Parcel F} and follow it due South on
the same line to the dam site.
As it stands, the City would not�be able to use the easement if the
State should give it up. Mr. Erickson asked.Mr. Siverts if he had an.y objections
to giving the Cit.y an easement over the same right of way that the State has.
Mr. Siverts thought it would be up `to the State and, as far. as he knew, the.y
hadn't been to the dam site for seven .years.
^ Mr. Siverts explained that the reason for Parcel F bei.ng where it is is
, because it is the only access for the parcel of land�to the East of it. He
. thought that would take care of the access to the Creek dam, and the Fontaine
land to the South.
. The Chairman asked Mr. Siverts if he would be willing to give the City
access over the easement for the period of its duration. Mr. Siverts answe�ed.
"Yes."
Mr. Je.nse.n commented that in the matter of str.eets and utilities
easement, they cannot be i.ncluded i.n a Registered Land Survey, bu-t it ca.n be
dedicated b,y writte.n document. He wo.ndered if there should be some consideration
getti.ng power in and providin.g for utilities.
Mr. Siverts said that Paxcel E would be the only lot that may be open
for consideration as far as possible sewer. Whe.n a request would come in for a
buildi.ng permit on Lot E, the.y might ask to have it without City sewer.
Mr. Siverts said the power li.nes come in on Lot E from Central Avenue
to the East. Trie Gas Company services through a new underground line from Ce.ntral
Avenue. The telepho.ne li.nes are undergroun.d.
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning_Commissio.n
concur with the_ recommendation of the Plats & Subdivisions-Street� & Utilities
recommending approval of Lot Split, L.S. #68-08, being part of Lot 1, Revised
Auditor's Subdivision #10, Ing T. Siverts, �r., as described on the Registered
� Land Survey dated May 9, 1968, subject to a receipt by the City from the
petitioner of an easement over the East 66 feet of Lot "C" desi�nated on the
Registered Land Surve�,r of Ma.y 9, 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
. motion carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Meeting - Ma. 9, �9�8 Page 3
Mr. Siverts said that Darrel Clark had been extremely helpful in the
� development of the land and I want to take this opportunity to �hank him personally
for spending this extra time on his part, and tha.nk him for his work in this split.
It is much appreciated.
There were two changes suggested to Mr. Siverts for the Registered Land
Survey: State Highway No. 65 should be removed from the West line of Central
Avenue. County Road "H" should be changed to 69� Avenue N.E.
2. PUBLIC FIEARING: YRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. #68-02,•PFARSON"S SECOND ADDITION
S.G. PEARSON CO., INC., REPRESEI�TED BY LEONARD SAMUELSON• North of 77th Way
and East of East River Road, a part of Section 3.
Chairman Hughes read the Notice of Public Hearing.
Mr. James Pearson, president of S. G. Pearson Co., Inc. was present a,nd
explai.ned their request was for a hearing to en.able them to plat for industrial
and commercia].. There would be no land use chan.ges, no modifications of an:y type.
Mr. John Dunphy, 155 Stonybrook Way: Is there any possibility the
developer would consider a border landscaping which�would reduce the impact of
the commercial property on the houses on the other side of the road; and would
baffle noises coming from this area.
n Mr. Erickson explained the Building Standards-Design Control Committee
require an extensive amount of landscapi.n.g for any type of commercial or in.dustr_ial.
Ed Thayer, 132 Stonybrook Way: My concern is they might put a service
station on pa�t of Lot 2.
Mr. Pearso:n answered that he did not believe a service station would be
interested in Lot �. There is a buildi.ng under construction on Lot 1. Lot 2
would be limited to per_mitted uses by the zoning ordina.nce. �
Ed Jonak, 133 N.E. Craigway: The area on the S,E. cor�er of 77th Way
and East River Road across from 77th Way -- there is a poteritial coxne� for a
service station and I have received.a notice of some hearing on it.
The Engineexing Assistant said that lot was zoned multiple and it
could be by Special Use Permit hearing which is a separate hearing by a differe.nt
committee.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Erickson, that the Planning Commission
close the public hearing of the proposed preliminary plat, P.S. #68-02, Pearso.n's
Second Aclditio.n, S. G. Pearson Co., Inc., being North of 77th Wa.y and East of
East River Road. Upo.n a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Erickson said that i.n light of what the Building Board has.suggested
in the division of property as far as the lot Iines are concer.ned a,nd the fact
that the Subcommittee has recommended approval subject to cha.nges, he would make
n the followin� motion: .
t' S
Pla.nning Commission Meeti.n - Ma.y 9, 1968 pa�e 4
� MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Ylinen, that tY�e Planning Commission
recommend approval of the prelimi.nar.y p3a,t P.S. #68-02, Pearson's Second Addition,
S. G. Pearson Co., Inc. represented by Jim Pearson, beirig North of 77�h Way and
East of East River Road subject to easements shown on the North line of Outlot A,
20 feet in width and 10 foot easement along the West and South line of Outlot A.
Also, the widening of the easeme.nt along the North l:i.ne of Lot 2 so that i-t
includes the culvert u.nder East River Road, and limit access on the River Road
as shown o.n the plat. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
� Mr. Pearso.n said he wished to compliment the City on the nice building
--it is very beautiful.
3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L,S. #68-10, THOMAS E. M�.RXEN: South 138 feet of North 306
feet of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision #108. -
Chairma.n Jensen reviewed the discussion of the Plats & Subdivisions-
... Streets & Utilities Subcommittee. The lot.split was previously granted to the
original owner and he did provide a East�West street right of way through the
center of the property, and then was allowed to split it into two parts. The
petitioner has purchased the North half, the line between the new road and
Onondaga and the North Half (N2� of the South part and he is now requesting
splitting these divi�ions again to six separate parcels. It was.the feeling
of the Subcommittee that a lot split of this sort would n.ot be in keeping with
� the intent of the.Ordinance and that a plat would be r�commended. Tlie second
portio.n of the discussion was relative to the dimensions of the lots indicated
� by the peti�ioner and this subject has previously been discussed a couple of
'years back and denied on the basis of substandard lot width and this is the
basic reason for the motion by the Subcommittee to deny this request.
�
The Engineeri.ng Assistant said the Sou�h Quarter (S4� has been split
off and the street is dedicated. Right now the dedication is fxom Lots 5 and 6.
The Commission felt these should be standard lots as long as there is
the possibility of doin.g so.
Mr. Jensen said he believed the Engineering Depar.tme.nt could help NLr.
Marxen. �
MOTION by Erickso.n, seconded by Myhra, that the Pla.nning Commission
co.ncur with the recommendation of the Subcommittee for the lot split request,
L.S. #68-10, Thomas E. Marxen of the South 138 feet of� the North 306 feet of
Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivisio.n #108 and recomme.nd d.enial. Upon a uoice vote, all
voting aye, the motion carri.ed unanimously.•
Mr. Je.nsen explained the method of division Mr. Marxen wishes is not
in keeping wi.th the Ordina.nce providing for lot splits, and that he would have
to replot this, land. •
n
�
�
Pla.nning Commission Meetin. - N1ay 9, 19�8 Pa e j
4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #68-09, ROBER`1' DEGARDNER: Lo�s 22 through 25, Block 7,
Spring Brook Park Addition. '
The Engineering Assistant explained that the Subcommittee wa.nted
Lot 26 combined with Lots 22 -to 25, and Lots 26 and 27 are both tax forfeit.
He had talked with Mr. DeGardner who said if at all possible, he would puxchase
Lot 26. .
Mr. Je.nsen stated Eldon Schmedeke had brought attention to Lot 26 i.n
an effort to elimi.nate it from being an isolated lot of which there would be no
mai.n.tenanoe if so isolated.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Plarining Commission
table Lot Split #68-09, Robert DeGardner of Lots 22 through 25, Block 7, Spring
Brook Park Addition, until the petitioner can attend a meeting and explain his
desire.
5. PROPOSID PRELIMINARY PLAT: P.S. #68-03 SOU�.P�II�AMPTON SECOND ADDITION, JULIAN
JOHNSON: Outlot 2, Worrel's Addition.
MOTION by Myhra, seco.nded. by Erickson, tha�; the Planning Commission
set the Public Hearing date of June 13, 1968 at 8:00 P.M. for the proposed
preliminary plat, P.S. #68-03, Southhampton Second Addition, Julian Johnson:
Outlot 2, Worrel's Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
caxxied unanimously.
6. PROPOSID PRELIMINARY PLAT: P.S #68-04, BARTH ADDITION, MF�'R.WIN BARTH Lots 16
and 17, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by E`rickson, that the Pla.nning Commission
set a public hearing date of June 13, 1968 at 8:30 P.M. for the proposed
preliminary.plat, P.S. #68-04, Barth Addition, Merwin Barth., of I,ots 16 and
17, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. Upon a voice vote, all�voting aye,
the motion carried unanimousl,y.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Erickso.n, that the Pla.nning Commission
Meeti.n� of May 9, 1968 be adjourned at 10:17 P.M. Upon a voice �-ote, all voting
aye, the motion carried una.nimously. .
Respectfully subrnitted,
. _ � ��
, ,
_ �; : _ ���= ,. � .. �? � :f� -, -�
HAZEL 0'BRIAN �
Recording Secretar.y
0
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION; MAY 13, 1968
+ Meeting was called to order at Moore Lake Beach and Park by Chairman Hughes at � 6
7:30 P.M.
� ROLL CALL
�
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hughes, Dunphy, Cochran, Fitzpatrick
MEMBERS ABSENT: Larson
OTHERS PRESENT: Paul Brown, Director of Parks and Recreation
COMMISSION VISITS MOORE LAKE BEACH AND PARK - Personal Inspection
The Commission made a personal inspection tour of Moore Lake Beach and Park
:•:in order to take a laok at the newly filled area north of the l�each.and ball
field area. Commission openly suggested items of interest and improvements
for the entire area. Discussion centered around what would to into the grourids
in respect to equipment and play areas.
Formal Meeting was called to order at Civic Center at 8:20 P.M. - Conference Room.
LETTERS
Received from Jack Dunphy, two letters: 1. Report on Meeting of Rice Creek
Association at Fridley City Hall, Community Center Room. 2. Random Thoughts
on Parks and Recreation 1969 Budget. Commission received and discussed these
letters.
Received letter from Robert Hughes - Subject: 1969 Budget. Recieved and dis-
cussed. �
BOND ISSUE BROCHURE
Proof copy of Bond Issue Brochure was presented by the Director to the Commission
for discussion and correction. Many points were noted for changing and correct-
ing. Commission discussed the schedule and procedure in mailing the brochure.
It was decided to have Mail House Company address 7635 units of the brochure and
make sure they are mailed on Saturday; June 1, 1968, at the Minneapolis Main Post
Office. Permit mailing will be used. All necessary arrangements would be made
by the Director.
PUBLIC MEETINGS AND SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS CALENDAR REVIEWED
The Commission added date and time of a public meeting scheduled by the League
of Women Voters - Thursday, June 6, 8:00 P;M, at Locke Park. Two additional
speaking engagements were also scheduled by the League of Women Voters on May
20th and 21st. Chairman Hughes will also have a slide presentation available.
Brochure will also be done on time for passing out. .
1969 BUDGET
The 1969 Budget was discussed and reviewed in respect to the Bond Issue passing
and also if it does not pass. Budget meeting will be on Monday, May 27th.
Capitol Improvements were the main topic of interest, Further information and
facts were brought forward by the Commission on the following items: Chases
^ Island, Meadowland Addition, Woodcrest School, Moore Lake and dredging prospects.
NEXT MEETING .
The next meeting will be Monday, May 27, 1968, 7:30 P,M., at Meadowlands Addition
with regular meeting to follow at Civic Center.
e
�
MINUTES OF MEETI�G, MAY 13, 1968
ADJOURNM$NT
•� The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 P.M.
Respectf y submitted,
. C=Z�c-�/ ����-
/
L BROWN, Acti ecretary to the Commission
Note: 29 days until Election Day
�
0
0
�
0
H
m
PAGE 2 ��
a
L � .
BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIUN CON`1'ROL SUBCOP'Il�IITTLE MLErl'ING MINUTES, MAY 15, '19�8" �
The Meeting was called to order by CYiairman Erickson at 7:38 P.M.
n l�OLL � CALL :
N�ERS PRESEN'r: Biermann, To.nco, Erickson, Hauge '
MII�'lBERS ABSENT: Dittes
OTHII3S PRESENT: Clarence Belisle, Buildi.ng Inspector
1.. CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE EiUILDING (25t X 12�) ON LOTS
6 8 9 AND PART OF 10 BLOCK 12 LOWELL'S ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK THE
SAME BEING 6¢80 UNIVEE�tSITY AVF��TUE N.E. REQUEST BY STANDARD OIL DIVISION OF
AMERICAN OIL.
MOTION by Biermann recommending approval subject to the building
matching the existing building.
Seeonded by Tonco. Upon a voice vote, there being no .nays, the
motio.n carried unanimously.
ADJOTJRNMENT :
The Meeting adjourned at 8s00 P.M.
Respectfully �ubmitted,
�
C1�RR:OL HAUGE
Acti.ng Secxetary to the Committee
After adjour.nme.nt and a quorum was no lo.nger present, Harris Fsectio.n
talked to Chairman Erickson who asked if this proposal for and 80 X 80 light
ma.nufacturi.ng building could be placed on the Council agenda. (Lots 34, 35, 36
and 37, Block 8, Onaway Addition.�
Clarence Belisle,
Buildi.ng Inspector
n
�