PL 01/30/1969 - 7275`�� PI�INNING CO�H�ISSION MEETING JANUARX 30, 1969
7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL:
APPROVE PLANNING C�4IISSION MINUTES• JANUARY 8, 1969
I�ECENE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MINtTTES• JANUARY 15, 1969
RFrF�' gUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN COTTTROL MINUTES• JANUARY 22, 1969
RECEIVE PI,ATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOl�41ITTEE MINUTEg;
,I�NUARY 16. 1969
1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST. ZOA �k68-13, HArIl�RLUND �
ENTERPRISES, INC.: Parcel 10 aad 200 (North 903 ft. of E.
3/4 of NE� of NE� Section 13) Rezone from R-1 to R-3A
2. PIJBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST ZOA ��69-01. PIIrPi'aM INC ;�9�,
That part of SE� of Section 24 that lies North of Hwy. �100
right of way. Rezone from R-1 to P.D.
'%r'303. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��69-02, GEORGE M. NELSON: N� of Lot 30,
^ N� of Lot 31, Auditor's Subdivisioa #129. Rezone from R-1 to
•_ R-3A. Coafirm Public Heari,n� date of Februarv 13, 1969.
$',3� 4. PRUPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT: __ P_. S.�k69-Ol, BRENTGIOOD ESTATES,
THUiMAS R. SWANSON: Rear 431.6 ft. of Lot 35, rear 401.9 ft. of
Lot 33, Revised Auditor's Subdi�ision #77. (Approx. 2.5 acres)
Confirm Public Hearing date of Februarv 13, 1969
PAGES
1-11
12-13
13A
14-16
17-20
21-30
31-32
33-34
�'�� 5. SEZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��6$-11, LOUIS 1�lO�MCHILOVICH: West 47 ft. of 35-36
South 120 ft. of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision �88. Rezone from
R-1 to R-3A. Confirm Public Hearin� date of Februarv 13, 1969
6.
7.
��
;�, ��
MINNESOTA STATE AID MiLEA�GE DESIGNATION:
Plats � Subs.-Str. & Util. Minutes
8. STREET ST[1DY: 73� AVENUE VACATION:
Plats � Subs.-Str. & Util. Minutes
Maps to be distributed at meeting for study.
9 . ffitCAVA1'ifiN ORDINANCE :
- �,
.,/'� ��'�.,9-u-�„�s f�G � -
' ����
�.��� �' = E�C
-�� - ��`-�-�--•-
37-38
39-40
14-15
41-43
16
44-49
�a.ANN7�iG CtIT�iISSION MEETING JANUARY 8, 1969 ���t �
^ ,
ROL CALL:
The meetiilg was called to order by Chairman Erickson at 7:35 P.M.
Members Present: Myhra, Mittelstadt, Erickson, Jensen, Fitzpatrick
Others Present: Engineering Assistant Darrel Clark
APPAOVE PLANNING CO�SSION MINUTES: DECII�ER 12. 1968:
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission
miautes of Aecember 12, 1968 be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
the mo�ion carried unanimously.
�ECEIVE PARKS & RECRFATION COrB�lISSION MINUTES : DECII�ER 16, 1968:
kI0TI0N by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Co�ission
x�ceive tt�e �'arks & Recreation Commission minutes of December 16, 1968. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
�'CE�V� BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: DECEMBER 18, 1968:
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Comaission
x�ceive the Board of Appeals minutes of December 18, 1968. Upon a voice
f'� vote, all voting aye, the motion carxied unani�ously.
1. PUBLIC MEETING: HYDE PARK ADDITION REZONING STUTJY BY NASON. WEHRMAN, KNIGHT
AN� CHAPMAN, TNC.
The repxesentatives from the planning firm were William Chapman and
Michael Murphy.
The Chafxman gave a brief run down of the problem by saying that many
taonths aga the Planning Commission realized they had an area of same 80 acres
between Main Street and University, 57th Avenue on the South and 61st Avenue oa
Nortk� whi.ch was presently zoned R-2 permitting tw� family dwellings. In thia area
there axe uses of Industrial, Commercial, Multiple, Single Fami.ly and, he thought,
almoa:t �no two family dwellings. Under the old meaning of the R-2 Ordinance, there
was pexmitted certain types af multiple dwellings and that is what you have a$reat
deal of do�m there now. They felt an area that large of two family dwellings was
p�abably improper, and becauae they were just plain citizens, just like the people
pxe��e�nt, t}�ey ne�ded help to know what decision should be made fox the rezoning
x8y,upq��d Chat ax� continually coming up in that area. They xequested, some months
a$o, �hat the City Council hire a proEessional plax�ner to make a study of the axea
and xo see if they could come up with some reca�endations for the Gammissio� to
uss, and the City entered into a cot�zract with Nason, Wehrman, Knight & Chap�Oan,
�xtc. 'Tk�e Planning Co�ission had not given them any direct advice; they were left
��.th ax� open mind to consider every type of possibility. This meeting de£initely
Waa x�ot a xe�oni,ng hearing.
�' Mx. Chapman explained that they had been working with the Planning Commission
�,ad their concern haa been to develop a guideline plan fox the development of the
�_l�i.� Comimis s ion M�eet 3.n� - Januarv 8 i 1969 p$�e 2
of tbe area which could be utilized by the Planning Cotimission in the futuxe.
Their intent is not �o discrimina�� against anything, but to improve the
^ ax'ea t�o the benefit of the area xesidents and to the area at large. They
�nade.planned studies - no engineering studies - of the area, what exists,
what pxoblems axe there, what they could expect to happen over a period of
time. Their thinking, ta some extent at this point, is how it will grow
pver a period of time and what they feel would develop over a period of
time. Mr. Mike Murphy was asked to discuss this.
�
�
M�r. Murphy used the projector to exhibit the maps. M,ap �1 showed the
xoAing of the Hyde Park area and irnmediate surrounding area, but did not
eross over T.H. #47 to the East. As the tnap indicates, an industrial district
ia �ituated between two residential areas -- Hyde Park to the east and
anAthex xesideatial area lying along the river to the west. The circulation
of traffi,c was discussed. It was'noted that residential streets would carry
cammexcial and industrial traffic as both of these uses require traffic
which would caae on the streets iimmediately adjacent to com�nercial or iadus-
trial, creating a traffic hazard. Map � was a circulation map ahowing the
main routes bein� Main Street, 61st Avenue and 57th Avenue. The indications
are that the present circulation system will be inadequate to sufficiently
aexve any of the three uses to which it will be put. Such traffic will be
a h�zard to children and pedestrians.
Map ��3 is the Existing Land Use Plan, and this showed the size of the
building stxuctures. Mr. Murphy continued that the point to be considered
here was that those houses which are in the lower range of square footage
will aoon became inadequate. It was noted that apartments have repl,aced
pxeviously built houses. The small houses wi.11 probably go first and if
that happens, they will go to a*+artment buildings. �'he apartments account
for about 30% of the structures ;.Yz the residential area of Hyde Park and
houses are about 60'/. of the families.One thing to be conside�ced are the
childre� from the apartments. It is not likely the apartments wi11 over-
load the schools, but playgrounc:.a are needed for the children because they
do npt have yards of their own and are playing in the neighbor's yard or
in the street. Based on this look at the area, several reco�endations can
be reached at this point. This is an area that has been previouely dominated
by single family dwellings and are now switching to apartments. If this
ha�pens, it must either be encouraged or discouraged altogether. Because
of the North-South access, it is an ideal location for apartments or town-
houses. You should try to encourage the most satisfactory development.
Other considerations are handling of traffic that is in conflict,
auah as coa�►ercial traffic. Referring to the three coa�nercial settlements
on 3rd Street, Mr. Murphy said there is no access for them from Highway #47
and since the only access for theae 3 caamercial settlements is through the
residential area itself, the recaamendation is that these three not be allowed
to develop further.
We also included in our pioposals the need for a park to be located scrme-
wheze in the study area. We tried to locate it near the center and in a loca-
tion where, at the present time, there are no buildings.
We have prepared and have with us three plans in which we have tried to
iadicate solutions and provided what we feel is best for the pxopex develop-
meut of your area.
P a�ss �n M��tin - Janua 8 1969 �' Pa e 3
'�cl�eme A: The +traffic signal �n �Univ,,ersity Avenue has been changed from
Che intersection at 57�h Avenue to 57th Place: The advantage of this is co�er-
^ cial oi► both sides of �he street and permit the deve].opment of lot depths
nea�ssary fox app�opriate coutnercial frontage. The diagonal crosswalks on 60th
Av�nue at 2nd and 2� Streets would block traffic coming into the area and
fo�:m a loop that would prevent traffic entirely through the residential area.
Noxth of 61st Avenue are single family residences. In order to prevent damage
�o pxoperty values as a result of an abrupt change in land use, it is recom-
meaded that the northernportion of Hyde Park, lying generally between 60th
and 61st Avenues be held in predominantly single fam7ly use, below this as we
ga South from 60th, we start out with two or three family dwellings, then to
higher density a�ultiples adjacent to the commercial along 57th and 57th Place.
Scheme B: 1'he traffic remains the same at 57th Avenue, without relocating
of txaffic signal and the commercial the same as in Scheme A. A possible Park
Site�;: �;;�t��u�les 2� �tre�et and 3rd Streetr, It �,s,, �l�n¢�'t �wo acre�, generally
undevglm�het� ta�it� th� ,,exception o� th�ej� ,ho����;> '�'�'�aould `be pASSfbl� to buy
them and '�leave a relatively large area free `�ar' �,he ''p'layground. fihe di$gonai
crosswalk�s are in the same place as Scheme A.
Schetne C: 57th Place would eventually'be vacated as a through street
and converted into a service drive at the rear of the coa�mercial development.
It would then be necessary that no further residential development be allowed
to occux with frontage on it. 59th Avenue has been vacated and vacant land
tp be acquired for a park. 5econd Street and 2� Stxeet would end in cul de
sacs on �ithex side of the park.
� Mr. Chapman added, that as you see, we have reviewed essentially a
�twelve block area, barely 3� blocks wide, bounded by a major thoroughfare on
the East with no access on Univers�ty Avenue, a potential industrial area
on the West, cammercial activities on the South. What we have is a small
aei.ghborhood which we must do everything possible to improve. Our concern
was about the existance of small comnercial pl;aces within the area, concern
for traffic, tnajar concern is the continual possibility of industrial traff�c
produced by the land to the W�st. It could be adverse to the comaunity if
noX properly handled.
Chairman Erickson, at this point, asked for the opinion of the people.
HaxJ,ow �. Kinney, 5841 2� St.: T have lived there for quite awhile. If they
pu� �.n this park (Scheme "C") I will need to get a helicopter to get out of
�nty yaxd. Now to get to University, I have to go to Main Street if I want
�o go South. I have to go down 3rd Street Co go North, go around a dozen
ci�'cl�s to get to Holly Shopping Center.
Jack 0. Kirkham, Mayor: Asked if the surrounding areas had been atudied
�1nd i.x�vestiga�ed, such as the Northern Pacific Railroad track, the Great
NoTthe� Track, East River Road, but there was no indication what was going on
aaxoes T,H. �1�+7. We do have couanercial development here (West side of Univer-
sity). It seems quite evident that residential development has been propoaed
ii't a��.�. o� the Schemes, �ut it has ber:� residential for a long time and nothing
'�a8 happened. IIp North on Highway #47, South ot Osborne Road there is now
� pxoposed a cotmnercial development. It developed after it had been changed to
cou�naexcial,
'.� ,,, ,', �, . �. M . , .
P1�,��,ituz 4ommi.ssion Meetin� - Januarv 8j 1968 pa�e �,
Anp�hsx tbing not considered, one of the strongest motiva�ing factozs
� w�s the fact� that most of the people ia this 3,ta�aedi,ate area were asking for
a�nd iaterested in comnercial zoning. It might be possible co�ercial there
would not be good, but I would like to see some proposals showing what would
happen if co�nercial were there. To get access to the co�ercial area, there
aottld be a slip off xamp o� 61st, the diagonal crosswalk �ould be used, and
cout�►ercial could be from 60th Avenue South on 3rd Street. It is hard for the
people who have commercial developments here to watch successful comnercial
ent�expxises being developed across University Avenue.
Mayor Kirkham would like tp recotmiend a canpletion of the planning study.
It did �not seein to him we have accomplished what we set out to do. He felt
we asked for a profeasional planner to come in and sk�ow us the best use of
the land here. Since it was the desire of so many people to want co�nercial,
he wauld like to see at least a proposal of what a commercial development
would do and what it wouldn't do. Wherever separation is needed between
commex'cial and exisCing aailtiple, we could use the diagonal crosswalk to
separate this and then keep the commercial traffic in commercial area as
shawn �n the Schemes. The assigriment has not been completed. We need more
atudy.
Mr. Chapman answered that he would like to take up the point of the
comatexcial development. They had considexed commercial, but the exhibit
does not show a strip of comenercial on the East� si.de backing up to a$ood
residen�ial neighborhood. One of the probleins extending out �rom Minneapoli�
�s a strip of cotmnercial development facility. Some aXe not too good. They
� do have a tax return and have, for the owner, in the change from residenti.a�.
to commercial, a passibility of valuation. Some couanercial strips in Minnea-
po11s which extend out Central Avenue are � block wide, but they have produced
pxoblems ior the com�unities. The width of the commercial strip East of
Hi.gl�way ��/+7 is substantially widex thaa what could be produced between the
Righway and 3rd Stxeet. Zt is especially narrow and we feel it is much too
z�a�'xow to serve commexcial. He did not have the market information to show
the+ tneed �Ax that much mare co�nnerc�ial in this area at this time. If we are
go�,ng to xemove the residential to �llow co�nercial, two shallow blocks of
width fox residential suxrounded on two sides by coaan,ercial and one side
iadustxial, I would say would not be good.
Mr. Muxphy said that the reason there is no co�ercial on the West si.de
of Hwy. ,'1�+7, but on the East side, is that there is very little relationship
across the highway. There might be similar uses, but they won't be uses that
axe xelated with a direct connection. They don't affect one another.
Eldon Schmedeke, 5900 University Ave. N.E.: He stated he was a prop1rty
owzlex in the co�nercial area for twenty years. On this narrow strip you ay
cc�mtgrcial can't exist long. It is hard to prove to me. The planner's m�ip
doesn't shQw his complete area as he owna three lots instead of two indi.cated
o� their tttap. He said he had drawn up maps he intended to give to the Planning
Commission which show a slip off going in on 60th, crosswalk and diagonal,
59th is open. This plan would not bother the residential North of 60th Ave.
Mo6� o� the resi,d�nts object to the paxk as shown in the Schemes, but would
� like �h� City �o buy the industxial �and naw before it goes sky h�.gh fox a
�ood s��ed paack. ,
�1,��_�_p�niasion 1!�eetint� Jan. 8, 1969 Page 5
bix�e. F1oyd Bradley, owner of apartments at 590Q, 590$, 5916 2� Street;
8he eaid they have apartments dawn there atid would like to know just eacactly
/"\ wher�+ the park will be. -A neighbor said it would take the first apartment
buildixtg. We have been thexe six years and taxes have increased. Would be
glad to sell right now.
J�t�sen informed h,ex the plan would not affect her buildings.
Ck�a�.rn�an Exi�kson again informed the people tha� �his is not a rezax�ing
h�ari�g. Th� idea behind.the planner's presentation is to try and establish
��att�x� o� development and a gatterx� that the City can li.sten to as fax
�s a rezon�ng pattern is concerned. Thexe is no plan to demoli�h any�hi.ag.
Mrs. Donald Crooks, 5910 2nd St.: S�e asked Plan C to be shown on the
pxojecCAr. She said she lived on the Nort3z side, 59th and 2nd street and on
the l��t aide of 2nd �treet on the corner. Your map does not show our
pxopexty $s it is. We have an exit from our progerty onto 59th from our
gara$e. You have our house smaller than all the surrounding houses which is
not the case. -
�ix. Murphy explained these tnaps do not necessarily indicate the outlay.
Mxa. Crooks said sh� felt someti.�n�s theae pl�ns are put up that way to
matke the hauses look chit�Czy, "
A$ain Mx. P�uurphy �ri.esl to assure hex that they were not trying to shave
o�f Ch� vaJ,u� o£ any of the houses.
^ Mrs. Crooks co�n�inued Chat hex house has been shown as having smallex
floox space than she actually has .�nd then the plan shows that 59th Aven�ie
wou7.d be taken away so that they waul�dn't be able to get out of theix pro�exty.
' �ir. Muxphy said that this ia �ot a plan but a Scheme being presented.
�'he reason why three Schemes were made up rather than one was to give yau the
choice of alternate that could be enacted in your neighborhood if you agxeed
with i�. '�hese three,they feel,were acceptable as far as th�ir b�sic gaals
wsre co�,aerned.
�xs. Crooks: AbouC University and the Comaercfal there, I stiil can'�
underatand why those people were not given a servic� road along University
a,t th� time of the Hi$hway. They te11 me they ran out of land. 1'hat does
npt u�ke sense to tne. Wtxen the� plans were being made, why can't they make
q, ac�rvice x4ad along Univers�.ty.
;
1+'�ac� Muxph�y replied �hat there was not adequ�te room for a serviae d�ive.
(He re�exred to �h� atap).
1
Ii.ogex �erggre�, 5821 2nd St.: I� wot�dering �bout the use of the �ark
i1� thi� area, The stndy is mainly of apartment buildings and the childr�n
thsxe, � think �aast of them are pace-school. In my apartment, by the time
k'�air �'�i.ldx�� axe grown up, they move out and into homes. We have a park
�,A th� Sylvan �i11s axea. In the last park bond issue, they planned buying
l�nd oa Che avx�ner of Main Street and 61st Avenue in fihe industrial area.
� � dot�'t �Cnow haw many children are in the _area now, but I think the childrea
i'� the� apaxtmenta wtten they are older, will not be using the park.
P1���x _C�otpmission Meetin� - Januarv 8, 1969 Pa�e 6
Mr. Murphy added that if there were many apartmenta in the area, it would
� be expected there would be children and that there would be a rather high
number of small children, an average of one child per apartment.
Chairman Erickson ask�d the opinion of the general aosd�.�a��e aie to
whethex or not a park ia needed in tha�� �s�a.
Mr. Roger Barggren said that the ownere of multiple da►elliags ix� this day
and age are tryiag to discourage peopls with children.
Councilman Liebl, Third Ward; (Standing at projector) I do agree
paxtially with Mayor Kirkham. This area between 61st and 57th -- I am your
eouncilnian at►d represent you at the council table and it is my opinion that
we should have no rezoning from 61st to 60th at all. This is a very well
establi�hed residential R-1 area with a couple of exceptions -- two double
buagalows and a nice apartment building. A lot of people have called me and
iadicated that they are willing to go along for a coaanercial rezoning if
they can get enough money for the land to sell out and they could build a
house somewhere else. They indicated to me that they would like to see,
from the middle of the block all the way down 2'� Street, rezoned commercial
just like the mayor indicated.
He continued that he was not too impressed with all three Schemes, but
he did not criticize the Schemes as he realizes a lot of time was spent on
them. We already have got a lot of apartment houses which are in bad shape
• and the streets are not in good shape either. The people South of 60th Aveaue
/"\ are ready, and I think the petition indicated they are willing to go commer-
cial. You have comnercial in Holiday and in the last few years the trend
has been comnercial moving to the North. We have to be consistent. We have
to decide either to go all the way R-3 and leave partially R-1 or R-2 or
go and create a com�nercial area all the way along University Avenue. I would
like to see Mr. Chapman, if it is all n�ssible, if it is feasible to prepare
a proposal which would make it possible to have co�mercial area up 2'� Street.
We also need a park in this area. There is a five acre plot, which is
aLndustrial and easily accessible from this area. We had it on the park boad
issue last year and it was defeated. We still need a park in this area.
�f we go R-3, it is going to create twi,ce the traffic problem that we al.ready
have, We have to have two blocks in depth for the commercial establishment.
T would like to say that we instruct Mr. Chapman and Mr. Murphy to prepare
a sketch showing co�nercial as discussed.
Mr. Chapman stated that he did not think they were so far apart in
their thinking. The concern was that the area between 60th and 61at should
xetn�in pretty much the same, single family, but commercial activities should
co�n�ine themselves along 47th and adjacent to Holiday. Most of the commercial
is xight on the end, adjac`"�e to Holiday. Coamercial should happen in this
axea. I am woxried about this squeeze play on residential. I do not know
the market for commercial in this area. If a larger area of carmercial should
happen, it should be done on a large scale, a developer should get a number of
parcels -- one half block, one third block or one and a half blocks. This
would allow you a good devel�^ment. If individua� lots were sold, it should
^ pxeferably be two or three at a time. Concerning the park area, our thinking
was �or the small children that they would not be required to cross a thorough-
fare. Our idea was a neighborhood park rather than a city wide facility.
Y].a�n____im� Comma asian Meetin�, �7anuary 8, �969 Page 7
�xank H. Hart, Jr., 6000 3rd St.: I was surprised so many people were
/`1 a��a�ins�t �he park. Speaking of commercial zoning, you have your big Holiday
stoxee which axe breeding places for juvenile delinquents. Some form of a
paxk far the childxen to work off their frustrations should be figured in.
�f Che people would stop to think about this, I think they would find it to
be �rue'. I think definitely there should be a park.
Mr, Schmedeke: The reason we did not like a park in that area , a lot
of us people here have homes which are paid for, probably some in each block.
When you take a home away that some people have already paid for, it makes it
mean. Everyone was interested in a park on Ma.in and 61st Avenue. Appraiser's
price never turns out to be what people have in the home. If we are going
coumexcial, I don't know how badly we need a toddlexs park there.
Mrs. John Peka, 5925 2� Street: If we took this as a park, it will be
just too small. If there is going to be a park, it should be for some of
the older children, too. We are right across the street from the lady that
owns the apartments. There is a problem of parking now and when the stxeets
are so narraw, I don't think a park would work.
AeWayne H. Woehler, 6004 2� St.: I agree on the park. I have kids about
to be �eenagers. They are the ones who need the park -- toddlers stay ;Ln the
yard. The kids go to the swimming pool clear over to the Junior High. I
would like to see a park in the industrial area as discussed.
Jensen said he wished to com�nend the people that have spoken tonight at
^ this meeting. The Planning Co�ission have received a great deal of assistance.
Com�ne�ts have been ma.de in a very fair fashion. Oftentimes these public
tae�tings do not turn out this way. He believed they all had a fine inter-
change of ideas.
Mrs. Crooks: I agree with Mr. Hart on the proposal for a park in that
area. The present Sylvan Hills Park is �t adequate for the larger children.
We need more park area for these children and I believe it is necessary for
the comarunity.
Kenneth R. Strand, 5955 2� Street: I am in the area where everybody
��1ks about commercial. I am undecided yet. I would just as soon see the lo�
just as it is, R-2, but if three quarters of the block goes co�aercial, I
wou�.d have to go for coumercial� too.
Mrs. Crooks: From 59th Avenue to 60th Avenue West of 2� Street, there
�xe new homes that have been in not too many years and are nice homes. Tt�ere
ar� xeally only two that are small so there would be quite a few homes you
Would have to disrupt. Anyone could sell their particular parcel, but we
would have to live there for twenty years. At the present ti.me, the homes
alon$ �hat area would be very much harmed by the change of zoning and more
ut�altip�.es wou�d be very hard tc� live next to, but if you develop University
�i7c�t and then go back, perhaps our area would be ready.
Coxirad D. Garness, 5916 2nd St.: I feel rather than take aomebody's
� ho�ne wheri, thexe would be enough room elsewhere, the park should be in the
�,�ndus�rial zone where it has already been mentioned.
,�,�,�{ Co�i.ss�o��ieeti�nA - Januarv 8, 1969 Pa�e 8
� �jra. Harlow Kinaey, 5841 2� St.: Talking about building up apartment houses,
we built our �,ome to specifications. This is probably about the only one
that is built this way. We would be living there with apartmente all the way
around us. The problems of the apartment across the street are traffic,
xubbish and garbage. I would like it to be total comnercial starting at one
e�ad and working their way up.
Mr. Schmedeke: I would like to have you accept these petitions. In my
proposals, I don't think all of us are hoping to wait for a shopping center to
buy the whole works. I think it would be £air to start at one side of the
block from a camnercial area and taking at least the smallest'size area
' that, was so.ld ac.r.os's ,the .s.txeet fxom.,u�.; :, �f it,were tl�ree or ,four lots wide,
that woi�ld ti� s��ficient on tihe �fu11 t�locks ...,I 'was, �h'opiizg it ;�Qu;� go �he
dspth of th� block, hoping with your Coi�cu�et�ce, the buildi.ng �! , t��: � c�,°
the front (West side) with parking in the back a�d it would not�� tt�wi:pa�ki�g
from;the highway. This would be solved on the small lots by haiiiiag � e.creen
�£'evergreens and sodded. And having the parking at the back of'the buildings,
it would be possible for it to be as nice a place as anywhere in the City.
Mi0TI0N by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the PlaAaing Coumission
receive the Petition dated December 15, 1967 circulated by Eldon Schmedeke
xe.�:��ive to a desire for coirm►ercial zoning in Blocks 12, 21, 22 and N� of
Block'28 in Hyde Park Addition ot, Fridrey, and also a Petition for Blocks 12,
2�., 22 and 28 for the same purpose dated January 3, 1969 apparently circulated
by Eldon Schmedeke, and a Petition dated January 3, 1969 appareatly circulated
by Ezwia Bjorngjeld requesting that the existing R-2 zonin�g be waintained in
^ Block 9 and W� of Block 10, artd Petition dated January 3, 1969 circulated by
Clifford Skillings requesting that the present R-2 zoniag be maintained also
in Block 9 and W� of Block 10, and a Petition dated January 3, 1969 circulated
by Lee Barott requesting the existing R-2 zoning be maintained in the E� of
Alock 8 and Block 7, all in Hyde F�.rk Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Erickson asked if Mr. Schmedeke wished to present his maps, but
Mr. Schmedeke declined asying he would bsing thmn to a meeting for the Com�is-
sirnn to etudy.
Mr. Chapman said he felt at this point that he would like to read the
transcript of this meeting to clarify, in his mind, what the feeling is.
To digest it to see if he has learned something different frosa what the
Planniag Coamission has learned and then discuss it with them.
Mr. Mittelstadt said he felt the Mayor thought this study was not complete.
He felt it would be up to the Council to decide what the future steps should be.
The following by Mr. Jensen was for clarification to the public: Mr.
Mittelstadt has been on the Planning Comnission for a relatively ahort time
and waaa't in on the full backgrouad of study. It is true the coasulting
plannexs were hired by the City Council, but they have been working pretty
aa�,tch under the directic and in consultation with the Planning Cadmiasion
with relatively little contact with Council. From that standpoint, it
� would seem logical for that direction to come from the Planning Commissioa
ualess the Council would direct us ia aaother direction.
Plati�ir� Ccmm�issio� Meetin� - January 8, 1969 Page 9
.. _
�
Chaixman �rickson said he agreed. He thought Mr. Chapman's coaiments of
want�.x�g to study the transcription was fine, but if the Counci� wished to
!"'\ direct him to prepare another map of the area showing feasibility of what seemn�
to be the general opinion of a commercial district a�ong 3rd Street, we should
dirsct him at this point.
Mx. Myhra said it se�ms without a question it is the�feeling of the gxoup
a�d that's what we waat.
p�ir. Jensen ca�aented that one area of concern relative to the.idea of
co�ercial expansion in the general vicinity of 3rd Str�et to 2� SCreet from
59th Avenue to 57th Avenue is the economics. I am not particularly well
versed in this subject as an individual, but if this were proposed tp b�
zoned cammercial, and that the Planning Commission would recoam�end it tq the
Council, I would be somewhat concerned that we should have the op�nion of an
expert on the marketability of this property as comnercial and capabil,ity
af the i,ndividuals living in that area to actually sell their property with
the improvements on it for a fair price and to actually find buyers that
would be able to pay that fair price. It would not be logical to embrace a
plan which would not be economically feasible for those owning property at
the present time and future potential bu.yers.
Chai�man Erickson asked Mr. Chapman if he would care to co�anent now on
60�h Av�nue and the land South. Mr. Chapman answered he would like to discuss
it w�th the Planning Comaission before going in that direction..
Ma,yor Kirkham couanented that there is a question of whether:or not
� maxketability data is in the realm of our responsibility and befaxe we ask for
or order such a report, we should get an opinion from the City Attorney.
Chairman Erickson said the practice of spreading a co�ercial use in a
residential area would have to be handled with great care because of the
tnajority of people involved and the problem of selling. Rather than call a
brief g�nexal public heaxing, the Planning Commission could call Mr. Schmedeke
ax�d others if they wish, to come in and sit down with us and then call the
general public in again.
Couucilman Liebl said that he knew what the people would like, but ielt
he would like to be represented by Mr. Chapman. He did not see any problem
�n peaple selling their hames for comnercial.
Mx. Jensen asked for a show of hands of those who thought it was logical
�ox the Planning Ca�ission to be studying the area. There was a majority
who thaught it was worthwhile. �
Chai.rman Erickson informed the public that Mr. Chapman, Mr. Schmedel�e
ar►d anyone else who wished to represent the area would be notified of the
meeting and that the residents of the area would be notified of the public
meeting,
2, REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF LOT 30, BLOCK 11, HYDE PARK ADDITION BY KENNETH R. STRAND:I
^ ' Mr. Strand explained that Council received the request at their meeting
of ,January 6th and notified him that they would just as soon not release the
1ot ux�til this study was completed. He tried to buy this lot in June and
�1 Cpm�ission Meetin - Janua 8 1969 Pa e�0
^ �d found the City had pulled it off the market last March. Of course T can
see, he �aid, why you didn't want to release it now, but maybe that is in my
�avox, too. I own Lats 20 and 29. At the time of buying I have no purpo�e
ou�side af cleaning it up, level it down as it is higher than my property
a�d �he children play on it. I would keep it clean and control it and add
it to tny yard. I have only a single garage added onto my house and I would
1�ke po�sibly to put a garage on the lot.
The Chairman asked him if, in the light of this, he would object if the
Pl��ning Coa�mission tabled his request for a couple of months. Mr. Strand
a�ewexed that he had no objections but would like to go on record to have
�he first opportunity to buy it after the study, aa hs beliMr�d i� �ould
u����ze the land better than anybody.
Mr. Strand was informed that by following the progress of the study, he
will know when the appropriate time is to open his request, probably when the
Platining Com�nission forwards its recrnrnnendation to Council.
1�OTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Coflmission
table the item of a request for the release of Lot 30, Block 11, Hyde Park
Addition by Kenneth R. Strand. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motiot�
carried unanimously.
3. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��68�13, HA1�Ilr1ERLUND ENTERPRTSES� INC. Parcel 10 and 2QA
(Na7rth 903 feet of E. 3/4 of NE� of NE� of Section 13). Rezone from R-1 to
R-3A. Reaffirm public hearing date of January 23, 1969.
Mr. Jensen said that this property adjoins New Brightor► and wondered if we�
should ask the administration to respond with at least some data as to the
zoning across the City boundary. (A public hearing notice was mailed t4 the
City Clerk of New Bxighton but was not asked for a response.)
MQTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Co�n�ss�oR
reachedule the public hearing o�f the rezoning request ZOA ��68-13, Hatmnerlund .
$�te7cpri.s�s, Inc. of Parcel 10 and 200 to rezone from R-1 to R-3A to
Ja,x�uaxy 30, �969 due to the inability to get a quorum on January 23, 1969 and
dixect the administration to re-advertise and send corrected notices to th�
Fxi.dley Sun and to the general public. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
motion carried unanimously.
4. REZOTTTNG REQUEST: ZOA �k69-01, PEMTOM, INC.: That part of SE'� of Section 24
that lies North of State Highway ��100 right of way. To rezone from R-1 to F.D.
Reaffirm public hearing date of January 23, 1969.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Co�ission
x'eschedu,le the public hearing of the rezoning request ZOA #69-01, Pemtom, Inc.
of that part of the SE� of Section 24 that lies North of State Highway ��100
ri.ght of wap, to rezone from R-1 to PD to January 30, 1969 due to the inability
to get a quorum on January 23, 1969 and direct the administration to re-advertise
and send corrected notices to the Fridley Sun and to the general public. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unani,mously.
n
�la�n�in� Commission MeetinQ - January 8, 1969 Pa�e 11
^ 5, SUGG�STED REVISIONS �OR PLANNED DEVELOE'Mt'�IT ORDTNANCE:
The Engineering Assistant explained that there are two separate �reas of
�h� Ordinance which we have found need for possibJ,e revisions and/or additions.
We have also been asked if this body would consider recougnending to Council
speci�i.c uses i�, a paxticular area upon the approving of an area zoned P.D.
We have found, and as reflected in a letter from the City Attorney, a por-
tion of the Ordinance that isn`t quite clear in respect to what happens to a
P.D. district when a plan no longer is valid due to the annual review necessary.
If upon reviewal it is found to be not practical according to the present ordin-
ancea it seems that if no plan is brought in, or the development of an approved
plan is not consumated in one year, it would abolish the zone and revert back
to its prior zoning. We want to know if this is truly your intent.
Membership discussion on this indicated a need for Ordinance,Amendment to,,
reflect the continuance of the zone with or without an approved p�.'�",�and ths� ;;��,;+
an approved plan, if in existanae, should be reviewed annually un�til'�its �conr'r '�? '� '
pletion. ° , �,
��
,
The second portion we should discuss is the possibility of staging the
aubmittance of final complete plans and i�rement development of large areas
as i.n the Pemtom request.
�n the discussion by the members, it was determined that in large areas
/'\ where a development could be spread over a period of years, it would be im-
pxac�iGal to expect a developer to bring in final plans for the entire area only
to �ind that revisions would become necessary, the result of which would be very
expensive. Many aspects were discussed and it was decided that if an overall
prelimir�ary plan indicating such things as type of buildings, road patterns and
street grades were submitted for approval, the developer could bring in final
;,; plans or smaller portions as the plan developes. The Comnission felt they would
set the m�.nimum size of each stage but wanted more time to study that aspect
of i.t. They asked if the city attorney, when he rewrites the portion on develop-
ment plans, could at the same time, include a section on stage development.
Aarrel Clark stated that he had been speaking with Pemtom xepresentatives
and that they were going to ask the City for some sort of indication as to our
feelings toward their specific development plan in so far as what use we would
pertnit to be part of the development plan. They stated they would rather have
the zoning request denied if we were not going to agree to a townhouse and
apartment complex for their area. The reason for this request is a matter of
financing and cost of having plans drawn.
After studying the motives for the request, it was decided that there was
merit in it. However, if they were going to be asked for any sort of couani,t-
ment on use, they would want a plan presented at the P.D. hearing and would
Wan,t public discussion on it. ,
AATOURNI�NT :
� There being no further business, Chairman Erickson adjourned the meeting
at 11:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Hazel 0'Brian
Recording Secretary
i2
�
BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE Nl�TING MINUTES, �ANiTARy 15_1969
1.
�
2.
The meeting wae called to order by Acting Chairmax�Biermann at 8:07 P.M.
ROLL CALL:
P�ERS PRESENT: Biermaxin, Hauge, Tonco, Sornsen
N�ERS ABSIIV'I'; Erickson
OTH�tS FRESENT: Peter Herlofsky-Senior �gineeri.ng Aide
_ ttr�U.r�a'r '1'U I:ON�TRUCT BOB �
N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA.
Mr. Bob Schroex was present to present his reque�t.
Mr. Schroer stated the building permit requested at this time was for the
garden center building only.
62
MOTTON by �'onco to recommend approval of the a,rea marked'in red on the plans
arid to con$ider the traffic pattern as sriown to be acceptable.
Seconded by Hau�e. IIpo.n a voice vote, tnere being no naye, the motion carried
unanimouely.
Mr. Mawchilovich wae preeent to discuss his request.
The follow�..n� points were diecussed;
1. The boiler room w�ll (See plans�,
2. Soundproofing between �'loors (Al1 carpeting or some other acceptable material�.
3• Setback of 40' (Owner's request to conform with neig�hbors to-the South�.
MOTION by Hauge to recommend approval of the plans, subject to;
1. Iteme 1, 2, 3 ae diecueaed.
2. Other correctione marked on the glans received January 7, �969.
3. Drainage and gra,ding plans ae approved by the City Engincer.
4• The alterxxate plan for the ground floor ie considered adequate concerning '
etora.�e a.xid laundry area. �
i
SeGOnded by Tonco. IIpon a voice vote, there being no naye, the motion caxried i
�, una,n�mouely, ;
,
��
4•
5•
�
BUILDI�G STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MEETING JANUARY 15, 1969 P�GE 2
�_
Mr. Ralph Thomas was present to preaent his requeat.
MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval of the plans as preaented.
Seconded by Hauge. Upo.n a voice vote, there beixig no nays, the motion carried
unanimouely.
MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval of the moving of this building.
Seconded by Hauge. Upon a voice vote, there being no xiays, the motion carried
unan�.mouely.
Dr. Speltz, Dr. Brandjord and Mr. George Walquist were present to diecuas their
requeet.
MOTION by Hauge to recommend approval of the plans subject to the following
etipulatione;
1. Correctione as noted on the plane, dated and initialed by Mr. Bierma.nn.
2: The submieaion of a revised Flot plan to the Building Inapection Depastment.
Seconded by Mr. Sorneen. Upon a voice vote, there being no na,ys, the motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOURI�MENT :
The meeting adjourned at 9:58 P.M.
Reepectfully eubmitted,
ER OFSKY
S�niox ineer'. Aide
13
� 13 A.
^ BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 22 1969
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Biermann at 8:07 P. M.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Biermann, Hauge, Tonco
MEI�ERS ABSENT: Erickson, Sornson
_ OTHERS PRESENT; Nasim M. Qureshi, City Engineer, Peter Herlofsky, Sr. Engineering
Aide, Henry Muhich, Building Official
1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A MASONRY BUILDING 50' x 120' TO BE
USED AS A WHOLESALE MEAT PROCESSING AND PACKAGING PLANT LOCATED AT 7501
COHIlKERCE LANE, THE SAME BEING LOT 25, BLOCK 2, C01�4iERCE PARK, ANOKA COUNTY,
MINNESOTA. ( REQUEST BY MR, RALPH BROTEiBN, 420 - 2ND AVENUE NORTH, MINNEAPOLIS
MINNESOTA 55401.) —
Mr. Ralph Brothen and Mr. Robert Brown were present to present his request.
The following points were discussed:
1. Concrete curbing (as marked on the plans.)
2. 10 foot driveway radii minimum size.
^ 3. Parking stalls to be designated.
4. A more complete plot plan is needed.
5. Architectural plans, sectioas, and elevations specifying material to
be used is needed.
MOTION by Hauge to recommemd approval of a foundation permit for the building
only, as presented on the plans and subject to the items 1 thru 5 as discussed.
Seconded by Tonco.
unanimously.
ADJOUNMENT•
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays the motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 P. M.
R ctfully submitted,
TER HERLO KY
Senior Engineering de
�"1
14
PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS
STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOl`�IIrffTTEE JANUARy 16, 1969 p�� 1
�
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jensen at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL•
Members present: Nagel, Batterson, Jensen
Members absent: Myhra, Crowder
Others present: Engineering Assistant Darrel Clark
1., P�IINNESOTA STATE AID MILEAGE D�SIGNATION: 1.6 Miles to be designated.
Fachibits available at meeting.
A city map was shown indicating county routes, existing state aid
routes, existing state aid routes to be considered for removal'and proposed
new state aid routes. It was explained that we quaZify for .56 additional
miles due to the opening of new city streets, that the streets recoIIanended
f.or removal totaled 1.07.miles and they, eombined with the new streets,
would equal 1.63 miles.
The four routes recoaunended for removal and the reasons for their
removal were discussed.
No. 323 Ashton Avenue: 79th Way to 83rd Wav: It is recommended we
� - remove this -route because of the improvement done on it without state aid
�"� funds beiag used. However, it was constructed with truck traffic in mind
and would not need spring load restriction posting. It is apparent that
this route be built for industrial traffic and is slated for 9 ton design.
1"�
No. 306 69th Avenue: Central Avenue to Hwy 4�65; Ttiis is a non-
existant route and the Medtronic Industrial development will prohibit
the route at this location.
No. 316 67th Avenue: 7th Street to Universit Ave.; This street
no longer has access to Hwy. ��47; therefore, no longer meets the-state
aid requirement of connecting two major streets.
No. 320 64th Avenue: Universit Avenue to 5th Street: This section
was built with state highway department monies as part of the Mississippi
Street loopback. _
The Subcommittee discussed the above recommendations and agreed that
they should be taken of£ the State Aid System.
MOTION by Nagel, seconded by Batterson, that the Plats.& Subdivisions-
Streets & Utilfties Subcommittee recommend to the Planning Coaanission that
M.S.A.S. routes, No, 323, No. 306, the portion of No. 316 between University
and 7th Street, and the portion of No. 320 between University and 5th Street
be removed from'the system. Upnn a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
u
: : � � � �. .. . .. . . . . �-.,...._�. �
� 15
Plats & Subs.-Str._ & Util. Mtt�. - Jan. 16, 1969 pa�e 2
Eight routes were discussed for possible new designation.
/'`� 1. 1.02 Mi. A1den Way, 75th Way, 79th Way combination: Right of ways are
. . adequate and route is about 80% improved and will not need any
new construction in the near future.
' 2. .60 Mi. Rice Creek Terrace and Monroe SCreet combination: Rice Creek Terrace
R/W is adequate and Monroe Street r.iaht of way is 50 feet. These streer_s
axe in good condition and would not need further improvement for many
years.
3. 1.02 Mi. Rice Creek Terrace, 68th Ave., 7th Street combinecl. Could be substi-
tuted for Route ��2 above. Right of ways are adequate �,�ith exception
of 68th Aue. and i.mprovement is possible to occur on 68th Ave. and
7th Street i�t the near futuYe.
4. .80 Mi. 52nd Ave., Buchanan Street, 53rd Avenue<and rlatterhorn Drive
combination. Right of ways are sufficient except for 52nd
AvenuE and i.mprovement is not expected on these for quite
awhile as they are in fairly good conclition now.
The remaining possi_bilities are marginal due to either locatian or their
present state of travel.. They are as follows:
5. .50 Mi. Benjamin Street - Gardena Avenue to Rice Creek Road.
� 6• .12 Mi. Benjamin Street - Rice Creek Road to Mississippi Street.
�
�• ,50 Mi. Main Street., 79th Avenue to 83rd Avenue.
•$• .93 Mi. Alden Way, Mississippi Place, Charles Str.eet combination.
The Subcomnittee recognized that the service drive along University
Avenue might also be given some strong consideration due to its being
assessed all on one side and also that we are going to be levying an
assessment to-the City Park and County for their frontage.
MOTION by Nagel, seconded by Batterson, that the Subcommittee recommend
to the Planning Co�nission the following two xoutes:
1) Alden Way, 75th Way, 79th Way combination.
2) Rice Creek Terrace and Monroe Street combination
and as alternates .
a) Highway ��47 East Service Drive (69th Avenue to 73rd Avenue)
b) 52nd,.Buchanan, 53rd Avenue and Matterhorn Drive combination.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
0
0
. 16:
Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Mtg. - January 16,.1969 Pa�,� 3
2. STREET STUDY: PROPOSED VACATION OF 73� AVENUE (Proiect St. 19b9-3):
� : The Subcommittee recalled that this was the case where the City wanted,
additional right of way for 73rd Avenue (state aid route) and Council won-
dered. if they could vacate 73� Avenue, perhaps the City could trade the
vacated poxtion of 73� Avenue for the new right of way for 73rd Avenue.
1'1
�
The Subcomm�ittee, while looking at a drawing indicating ownership and
zoning, discussed the various land trades and possible ways of property
develogment with 73� Avenue vacated and a service drive along Highway ��65.
It was-decided that the City should not initiate the vacation at this
time because of the land trading process it would start. A drawing was
atudied and on it was indicated how the area could develop without the use
of 73� Avenue as an access.
MQTION by Batterson, seconded by Nagel, that the City not initiate the
vacation of 73� Avenue; however, indicated to Planning Commission that if
the narrow strip (140 ft. wide) North of Central View were combined with
B1ock 1, Central View Manor, two building sites could be created, one a 5
acre commercial site with access to a service drive along Highway ��65, the
other a 5 acre industrial site with access to Central Avenue , and that
a11 of Block 2 could develop with frontage along proposed ?3rd Avenue;
that the Planning Commission, while considering the possible condemnation
of 73rd right of way, also consider the possibility of encouraging the
dedication for a service drive along the East-side of Highway ��65 between
73rd Avenue and Fireside Drive. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
motion carried unanimously. �
3. PROPOSED STREET PATTERN: Section 2, 3, part of IO and 11.
While studying a map of this area, the Subcommittee discussed the
development of this area. It was decided that one cannot really predict
the size of industrial sites and we should not dictate this by adopting a
street pattern for an industrial area. With the Bob's Produce rezoning
and development South of 79th Avenue, they reduced the study to this area.
MOT ' by.Nage1, seconded by Batterson, that the Subcommittee recommend
at the Planning Com�nission consider the alignment of Ma.in Street from
from 79th Avenue Soufih to l7th Avenue, thence defect to the East and
connect to Osborne Road opposit Commerce Lane. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT •
There being no further business, Chairman Jensen adjourned the meeting
at 9:15 P.M. .
ctfu y bmitted
CLARK
Recording Secretary
� :...a
�
�
n
CORRECTED
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIllLEY
PUBL I C �IF:ARI NG
BEFDRE TEIE
PLANNING CO�I�II SS ION
� 1'7
TO iti'H0�1 IT NiAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing
of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in,the
City i-Iall at b431 University Avenue N.E. on Januar�30., 1969
in t'he Council Chamber at �:30 P.�1. for the pur�ose of:
. Considei•ation of a rezoning renuest (ZOA �68-13)
by Hammerlund Enterprises, Inc, to rezone
fxom R�1 (single family dc�rellings) to R-3A
(apartment ancl multiple dwellinos)_the North
903 feet of the East 3/4 of the P1E 1/4 of
the NF. 1/4 0£ Sectioii 13, T-30, R-24, City
of Fxidley, County of Anoka, State of
Minnesota.
Gene2-ally located on the South side of
691h Avenue at the East City limits.
Anyone desiring to be heard ilith reference to the ahove matter
may be heard at this time.
Oliver R. Erickson
� Chairman
planning Commission
PUBLISH: January 8, 1969
January 15, 1969
January 22, 1969
:.;,
^
m
CITY OF FRIDLEY
MII3IV�SOTA `
PLANNING .AtID ZOt�I�1G, �O..M
Number ZC A� C�'-- 13
0
���-` ��-� 18
�7 �
TYYE OF REQUEST
�_Rezoning
Special Use Permit
. ,�.,., _.. Variance
t'� 1'�'Y' C�- '�� NATURE� =� i''�,�.� �..r:.-:' �r r�� 1!` LOt'$plits
��p`P�#�kI��S SIG
Address� �'/ ��; �, �' � iVr C. ! �I�C' • � Approval of Pre-
liminary Plat
_ Telegttone Number .: r�<< .:: ,�. ���,;.�
Approval of Final
,Q ^ �
al r �.� r,�'s %� � �!�' ��--- _ _ Ylat
% �
YRfi�PERTY`OWIQER'`S SIGNATIJRE � ' -- fi. "�- � -- r;''
- . Streets or Alley._.,,_.
Address _`;' ! :': %� l�l<? r`P� .r.� ,� �.•;�; l�_l�� , - : Vacations
� .
.
Telephone Number � �-;�._�/`� �i�� .� 5?S' -��"��,- �� - --- Other
J
... -� . ..� . _.._ . . . . . ' . � �. � � .
Street Location of Propexty ;� �?i,-r��,_. �1�.1� �-�'i� r�e7 �`t' � r�::T�" al i"U ,�l�ytl t�
i� � ,
��%� Legal Description of . ProFerty � ^ r;: � � � ,� � �;,., .-�,r� s� ,� ��;� , � �? :�, ��'�/ �� 'r,`'?=��ei
a6✓ i � �� `t. �i ` ,. , •f/.� '�� �'�it^, �ii. ��. �' `f��l!� !1 �, �l -S� _ !Of 1 rl. /7J�v �'_
� ^(�v ..�..= l � l� � '� � � ,- f 1 � , `%�� ..'r `� r
.N-( ` � � ' . .. r . . �� �- I . /' . _ .� � _.... °% �� . . _ �. .. . .� .
� i��� ^_ , % ;n '�' �r�, . � : J i � �J � J !� � %% /•� n't°� ,I( �"J (`; I� /1 U ; i'r'�'��� /,1 /`y':'a r � --' `, i
T .�. 1 1
present Zoning Classification n- 1
.
Existing Use of the Property �� �;1 !: i� "�"
_ _ - ;`
Propased Zoning CZassification, Special Use, Variance or other request �' ,=' -
Describe briefly the Type of Use and the Improvement Proposed h� ���""?�� �r?
n1���� 11 f'�� � =' l� �' �.� }��� � �n;
,
Acreage of Property ^: :� �� � , •_ -r�^�=; % �
�t.`� �'Cl �"' i? y �� � xy.)`v'� �l� �-�.�.'l �7� t['`'i ��:ii;t.°i::�
1-
Has the Present Applicant�Previous�y Sought to Rezone, Plat, Obtain a Lot Split,
Obtain a Variance or Special Use Permit on t�e Subject Site or Part of It? :`�,7
• When? __ _ _
What was Requested �, " Fee Enclosed $�'� '._1
� �•e..c c,�..f� t! �f I:3 S'�-y'
Date Filed ��i- �fc- ��� � r
Date of Hearin
�1 - . _ �
(` � YIA�NiN� ANTS ZONSNG FORM PACE 2 . 1.S
' Number . , .
The undersigned understands that; (a) A Iist of all residents and awners of pro-
^ gerty yifthin 300 feet must be att�cized to
this ap�lication.
, (b) 2his agplication mitst be.signed by all .
� o�iners of tha property, or an explanation '
�iven why this is not the casc.
(c) Responsibiliry for aay defect in the pro-
. ceedin�S resul.ting from the failure to list �
the names z`nd add-r.e�ses of alI residents
- , �nd propert; oo�r�e�s af progerty within 304
fe_et of the pLop�riy in question, be2ongs
to the undersf�ned.
Residents and 0-��ners of �xoperty iaitbin 3Q0 feet:.
. i'EItSONS ADDRESS � -
' ' �I S G� �v`P; �• � `� ��� �
�.lh A A/ L/' / �; I i, � � , n � �;`i :,� _ �-; r ,i� � , ��� /� '-
��/ �s`' .� ), c� � 'r� �(:.7:;���,-�n �-'�.�<, �%'fi��T" t��lt"�r ���t1 /if0A7�/"t.!r�' E?F'G,p�,�
�' ? I' � � � � �,�, -- � , �„ , / ~ + � -- � /
� � �� 1 ;_._.._,� -� � �, � �,�1 � � � � � �, .�. � A- �� �.�, (�/, �;
1��1� I`%.t;% (P I�� �')�/I?�°r"' :� l�,'°:/?���;��/��i4�(Y�� —"" ���� "���� f} %�L�s �,�: �,p"� �('n,,t/ b–; t/'�l!:/CJ
. .. _. .. . . . � �� � j . . �:
� � p � .
` �,,,. y �
[�, 'C��_ � • ,q��-/'/�. -a-�"� .• G , ./1� � , �n _O /5 %
. / ` � . - -
A sketch of proposed property and structure must be dra4�n on the back of this
:form or attached, shawing the follocoing: 1. ;Vorth Direetion
� _ _ 2. LocaCion of Propased Structure on lot.
, 3. Dimensions of property, proposed
- structur�, and fro�t and side set-bacics.
• , 4. Streei Nac�es
S. Location and use of ad�acent existin�
buildings (within 300 feet).
The undersigned her�by declares that nll the facts and repr�sentstions stated in.
this application are true and coxrect. r:= • �t �• 3� �� Ii'�
�.. � . � t'i s.#s
. . . ... � �J�5,: s11_/�. :., E.',.�: - •
DATE��-, .F�;�'? �<���% T/ � SIG�ivATURE ��' � •.f-�._i,- '�"`"�
I n r� �� � i✓-:: � A7C'��i
�+w��.
. � . ,��-����) �"J �;-r ;�, � )
� ,�� . _ �,r �;..�' t .{f'rrJ :> �, w°�rrZ � • ...
� � �- � . 1
' � ak sY i1e �t 4e a2 '�k sY de �
APl�roved Deni�d�. . By the yoa�d a� .�p��a�s� . _
Subject.to the Fo11oU�in� Conditions: . �BCQ
/�pproved Denied by the Plannin� Commission on
Sub ject to the Follo�,�i.ng Conditions; - ' date
.• . ,,^ �pg�cr��ed ->Deni��Y - _ 6y the Council on . . .. � .
` Subject to the Fo11oc i� ng Concfitions; � ' � d$te
� -.
•� .
Form PG i00 �
:
S
HA1+giERLUND II�ITERPRISES: ZOA ��b8-13 20
" ParceT ��10 and ��20Q (rd. 903' of E 3/4
� of NE� of NE� of Sec. 13
_ Rezone from R-1 to R-3A _ __ __ _ �
. . I
�
i
^ ' �
. . `, ly £ CORNER
�'% T, sEC, l.� -
�oao ,�y�,. .-- - , T
-------C4lJ N TY -- - — - - - - --- ---- - -- -- . �.
--------� - -�;� j�n� � �
. ,
� . -.. . ...� �`. •, b
� . �.�. � � . . .. � . . .. .. . . . . � . .. r 1v . ....
.. . . � � � . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . � .jc,i � . � p .. ..
� .. � .. �. � � . � . � � i .. . � � . � _� . .� � ` ••\ .. � .
i ` �
� . .. . � � . ' i . . ..�-� . � . � ... .G- . ` .
_..
� � � � I - __ . . � . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ` . . .
. . , � . . .. . .�� .. . . . . _ .. .. .. .. . .. . .
. . . , . . . . . ... . . . � . _
, ,
_. . . . . .. .. .. _ . � . . .. _ � .. . .. . � � � . - . . ...
. . . . . , i . . . . .. .
. . � . � . _ . ' . . . . . . � . - .
. , �. . . . . � . . . . . • � . � � . . . .� � . � . � . . � . �
. . . . . � . � . . �2. . . - _ . � . . .. . � . . . .
. . . . . . . . �. _ . ... . . .. . . . .. .
_ -_ . . . � . � '� � .. �� . . . . . . . . . . � .
. . !3'y'' � - , . ... � . . . � � .
�4/t'Crt��'r/cr.�:.cE � �2p9` _
✓�%i (iy�4 of/vE/4 i � 3�
a�'��rt . t . �
I ' ,_ _ � ; .
� (
I } _
�
• W
(�,� _ � ..J
^ j , co.r ,y,,�� , (ioI �
, .
, � .
� ;
_ � : _ _ � _ .
�
: ' ----- - -------- _ ! ------ ------------__-� -
� � -.
. . .�: r • ,>:-.�, ;; __ f� ..».
. � _ �
.,� �._.......
_ � ) ...�
�
� . , , . �
: �. � Eoso.� L�� :-7i >�%a,er.�xr L :l.a��.a � iay:ea�7 �j .»••
_ �. a _ ' ;� � -
� (z�a y _.�_.:
� - - . � ,r....,
,, � :
: � � .....
� :
pvrccT _
-s � 3Op " I �ti. ..
I•, �'� � , ...1 � . .
. � _
i' _ � . 9 �
Rt��' � . _ �
e� ' ,
, ,,,�
� .�, . .... , , + i
r�� - ��EK �,, � _ - ,
a+.,t�L t • '
• ���♦ � ���,� S:1ss O � � 1 .
J�I"M. .. � . � � .
.: �.s� �3,�. �,. x . ,� 6 1 ,
�i'f�: `+ eo� t eo iL', ae y / - o��!; . ���}�� ��� J322� . .
je ; - .9 ',�r % s : �M�� �_ , . r � �`� �31s ' i9s2 � t3 . � � .
I � ?;� - -- — — - , --�-- � yr.�. (� . . � .
�o _����;�fSCHQ�OL�. o , =�-- -=' _- `� � -� - ,;�� �� � ti � �
.;� _ � za j - et � i 3 0 !�� 2-� 3,
� _ ..f .-- =- - -- - —_— -= = -- - .Li ! ; �
. . . T. _ _
� �.Jf . . • . ¢ �'+ L � lJ.i) =• �a � 99✓' � .
_. z-- ,.
. - „ _ � .
� , - — --- . n ,`
,, � ,, . _
" i -r � ,!s _ _ ; ' � � " .r �_ - - _ _�t ' 6 G (�L l!Y E , � � � , -
. T- , *� �
- . , _ ,.__— _-;.� _. .
t —"-tl1_.__ , 'y
- � � � 2 S (,' � L' n?Js � � .!! l � �� : ��_... _. _
. G ss�t,,.� _ur__ _- -- -- --- t� -- - - � � � o o ry � �
� . i � _ 2¢ ' :/ / / m � d=l- ' ` ; � 9
� � � .i � -> - - - � — - - -- - �� �i' .�: �� _ �11/ • -- Z....� . �
� ^ S r. _. � ��' ,�� a �� '•
� � •-'�Z-- - --a - - ��_ s, •..�, , i a - - - � - - - e °`�� ` ; 2 � 2� �f'
� .__ _ C. _ _ �rt,l'E� '
' — l� --- - -' -- z �— —��--- /O � � �a.� f �...._..
; � 2� L � f �-' � � �o � ' � ,, . � f,.9 ` t;j �3•�� b �J � _ �:.
�
CORRECTED
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY -0F FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that there will be a
Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City
of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue
N.E, on Januar 3p 1969 in the Council Chamber at
8:00 P.M. for t e purpose of:
f1 Consideration of a rezoning request
(ZOA #69-01) by Pem.tom, Incorporated
to rezone from R-1 (singlE family
dwell�ngs) to P.D. (Planned Development)
that part of the SE 1/4 of Section 24
that lies North of State Highway #100
right of way, T-30,-R-24, County of
Anoka, State of Mi-nne.sota.
Generally located North of Highway #694
between Matterhorn Drive and the
Fridley-New Brighton Boundary.
Anyone desir�ing to be heard with reference to
the above matter may be heard at t�is time.
PUBLISH: January 8, 1�59
� January 15, 1969
� January 22, 1969 _
OLIVER R. ERICKSON
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COI�iISSION
21
� �
r
�f�f�
CITY OF FRIDLEY •� TYP� Or^ REQITEST
' MINN�SOTA . •�
^ ' ' . �_._. X__�___Rezonin$ .
• PLANNTNG AND 20iJING FORM
� Special Use Permit
Number ZOA ��69-01 �
' Pemtom, Inc. Variance
� �APPI.xCAI�TT' S SxGNATUI� 6�.� _ �/.�IQ�f• Lot Splits
Address 8053 Bloominqton Freeway� rTinn. 55420 Approval of Pre-
. �
Telephone Nu��ber 88$-9561 . liminary Plat
. ' APPxoval of Final
�
PROPERTY. OI�NEP.' S SI
Address � `�c,� c
Acres, Inc. Plat
n .�. . � � >�.-� - � �
Streets or plley---.,_.
• �. Vacations
Telephone Number 7 �%� — �.5 � �� ' � Other
Street Location of Pro ert North of Hw� �694 between bSatterhox'n Drive
P Y_,_.��..� r. Y-; d�,p��r.�,.�Bra.c�htc�n BQUndr.v
Legal D�scra.ption of . Propertyth�t part oi the SE 1/4 �of section 24 ,
�awnship �:�0, ranc�e ��, that lies north of state highway � 100 right
wa Count of. Anoka, State of Niinnesota
Present Zoniug Classification R-1 �
.
Existin� Use o£ the Property Vacant ,
-_,
Proposed Zonin; Classification, Special Use, Variance or other request. P•D•
Describe b;:iefly the Type of Use and the Impro�euient Proposed Single Family
attached homes (tocvnhouse), Multiple D�aellings and Single Family detached
Homes
Aereage of Praperty 120 Acres + .
Has the Present Applicant Prevfously Sou�hC to Rezone, Plat, Obtain a Lot Split,
Obtain a Varisnce ar `Sp�ciaY` Use Fermit on t�e Sub'j�c�r SiCe br Part of It? No '""'"� �" �� "`
When? � .
What was Requested � Pee Enclosed $ 40.00
/'1 , �
Date I%iled Date of Hearing
�
,� • PLANNIN; AND ZONING FORZi . i��.
. PACE 2 -. .
' Nuuaber ZOA �69-01 � � _ . . . •
Ttec� undgrsi�ed uczdersL•ands that; (t�) A list of aIl'residenCs and ocaners of pro-
/"� , perty within 30Q feet must be attached to
, th�.s application.
� (b) This application.mast be si�ned by aIl
o��ners of the property, or an" explanaCion " �
given c�rhy this is not the case.
_ (c) Responsibiliiy for any defect in the pra-
- . . ceeclin�s resul.tin� from ttie fa£Iure ta list '
'.. . the names �nd addr.esse3 of all residents
. �tnd property owners of proppr�y withict 300
� � � _ feet of the g;.op�4i:y in question, belongs '
. � . to Che undersi�ned.
Residcnts and Uaners of Property ��ithin 300 feet:
. . PERSONS � ' ADDItESS �
See at.tached list. � - '
^ �
A skeCch of proposed proparty and sCructure must be drac•�n on the back of this `
form or attached, shctoing the following; 1. Noz�th Direction
�2. Location.of.Proposed SCructure on lot.
3. Dimensions of property, proposed
structure, and front and side set-bactcs.
4. Street Names
5. Location und use of adjacent existin�
buildin�s («ithin 300 feet).
The undersi;ned hereby declares th�t a21 the facts snd representations stated in
tbi.s application are true and correct. pe tom, Inc. .
DATE 12/31/68 SIGivATURE S� � �% Gs
. � (APPiTClxNT)
� . .� • • ... . . •..
�'e ak � s•e 4t �'r R!c ��; .' .
,
,Agg�oued Deni�d .: ,. By the : os�e� b�-�P�e���� .
Subject to the Follot��in� Conditfons: aaC� , �I -•�M�_
Approued` Denied by the Plann�n� Commission on �
St�bject to th� Fo1Io:•;in; Concli�ions; . daCc
^ Approt�ed Denied by the Council on __
Subject to the Follocaing Conditions: date
Form PC I00 .
F
n
�
�
. ����� ���n�
G��-��� i� >� �f G �
List of Owners and,R�sidents
Withir� 300 ft. of Applicant's Property
Owner
Doyle non and Lois R. Mullen
Roq�r R. and Marlene E. Sonstegard
James F. E1].iott
David A. Doebler, Jr. & Yvonne
B. Doeb2er
William J. and Elizabeth A. Vidmar
James and Jayce Luff
John M, and Barbara F. Donahoe
wflliam A. and Ethel M. Dietz
Herman F. and Joan C. Bergman
Lowe1 C. and Delores M. Mellum
Ronald L. and Judith v. Morin
Will.iam D. and Kay L. Shontz
Harold E. and Vio1a M. 0� rt
Rabe�t E. and Gre�he S. Aho
Marvin F. and Dar�ene Corbett
WiYmer and Ruth Adams
LaVerne and Valencia A. Erickson
Henry, Jr. anci Virginia M. Wahlberg
David A. and Linda P. Petterson
Harold and Judith Holmberg
State of *4innesota
Nickolas C., Jr. and Carolyn M.
Huble
Henrik 41son
Kermit �a. and Louise H. Person
George D. and M. Jean Bukovich
Dona].d and Eleanor F. Heyda
Paul C. and Twyla J. Riddle
Richard E. and Harriet G. Hudrlik
Loren N. and E1sie W. Argabrignt
Lawe].I T. and Darlene A. Coulson
Howard G. and Loree Dunkley
Arvid �. Carlson & Son, Inc.
Jacob P. and Emma D. Wiens
Arvid E. Carlson & Son, Inc.
Arvid E. Carlson & Son, Inc.
State of Minnes�ta in Trust
Ovel t�T. and Elizabeth J. Johnsrud
John and Mercides Powers
Acres, Inc.
Acres, Inc.
Acres,.Inc.
James R. and Jane Durand
Don�ld and Lynda Zappa
Address
1233 Hathaway Lane
1249 Hathaway Lane
1265 Hathaway Lane
128I Hathaway Lane
u.�-1i
st. cioua, r�. 56301-
1246 Hathaway Lane
„155 Windsor Drive, New Brighton
128Q Hathaway Lan�
5503 Regis Trail
5517 Reg3s Trai3
5531 Re�is Trail
5547 Regis Trail
5561 Regis Trail
5577 Reqis Trail
5591 Regis Trail
5603 Regis Trail
5653 Regis Trail
5659 Regis Trail
5679 Regis Trail
7525 Tempo Ter=ace,N.E., "2inneapolis
�� I
4530 W. 38th, #322, Minneapolis 55416
1911
1223
1244
1224
1225
550�
5524
SS40
555�
320Q
5R09
32QQ
3200
Benjamin St.N.E.,
Regis Terrace
Regis Terrace
Regis Terrac�
Regis Terrace
Regis Trail
Regis Trai2
Regis Trail
Regis Trai2
France 1�ve. So, ,
Arthur Street
France 1�ve . So . ,
France Ave. So.,
Minneapolis 5541=�
��Iinneapolis 55416
Minneapolis,55415
Minneapolis 55416
58�1 Tennison Drive
I613 Berne Road
1214 .lst Nat'l Bank Bldg., Mpls.
1.214 lst 1�'at' 1 Bank Bldg. ,�ipls.
1214 lst hat'1 Bank Bldg., .ipls:
1553 Berne Road N.E
1549 Berne Road
. M, 25
Owner Address
^ Acres, Inc. 1214 - 1st Nat1 Bank Bldg., i�ipls.
�lcres; Inc. 1214 - lst I�Tatl Bank Bldg., Mpls.
Acres, Tnc. � 1214 � 1st Nat1 Bank Bldg., Mpls.
Olaf and Julie Scoenson 1457 Wind�nere Drive
Lawrence L. anr� G1adyS D. Palkert 5543 ��latterhorn
�' �ludubon Park Church of Christ 1260 Regis Lane N.�.
. �T f �l uC � /L�/n:.�' . � Si�
f� Rc N�� r C� «s� c� F� s�- P� �.� 2 2 E. S U�,� � r �-1 ��C .
2l ��:� �� ��
. � ��w- ��'�`"Jx.; " '$�
G� � � j
�-ci , ._..
� � � � �
-�_ �,
, . , � ��
.
_��._��- _ �,__.
� � � j , k; r `
'-� *.. , �. _�i L.� �, _ ._ _
! . �.._ < ; �
Ci `S
/ \
/ \
0
. . . . .. . . . . . ... I
"v Q pV3 v .� a�, `�.� �.���/YJ,..�. %•° R/i W `" n/^ r� J.�
� 6 a�� � �o � � �At� � � � � , 0 26
� � ; � ,, � `, ��t�:H—sT ..N.
.� -% :
caRDEN A AT`E A� ; 3d,, P �., . , �, ,�
/ �_. 31 ' 3t �( Z� 3S ;6 i? y
li ...,I,� ta 1d �4f.QS - p.. I I � .. . � . . � . . ZF 19 � ;� V Q. . . . Q . .
W - � . . . . l ,� � ---�. . �
�L . ? �! 1 . . . . . . � ' �� __ � � .
�t � 4� I I PROPOSE 3e- — --41 -�"
� �� P =
�a� i z_, ' � I GRACE 'CATHOLIC .o� Qi --�j
�'j o� � � HIGH SCHOC�L 39 - � ;
e -- - '
, z N � ► 1 O� � �
p � � . .-'C � W 4 I 1 - . . : . � . � . . `�/'6 Q ' j � . .. . .
�� �
�'' - - �' _ ' 4� `Q �' � 4B
•� � � 9 ' �1 . �---'.--Y\-.�.' .. -� -'. - -- ._-�
� ; .�„- W I. �
,Q�rg-� � ��� Q , R_:
: , . 49 sc s/ s2
,
„ ,
, , �. , �
�: � \ � I
�- -r � , -
I�?�ac�4iis1 /;2 3 r s �c � 8� �
LAIJE A10 22 ' ` 1 •
� \ `
4' I Z' �/ 2 Z7 14 6`s �E •
�
"_� ft .S' 4 , �' �� � �
: ,, � �
�9� /i I
I`� I ig �s �c_ I � {'
2 ' � 3 I .
�'�� u � u I � � �
` _ � 3- � � i _ _ _: - -- •
� Q � � � R � + � i --.-_ .�_ _ _ .
__ . _ __
o�,� � i �
�
� �„a 3 2 / � '
� �:: •" ` s ; w's j Pemtom, Inc .
�' '�o''_ 6 4 � ,z 4 ;st I ZOA ��69-D1 : � •
�` 3 0 � That part of SE'� of
`' �� � 5j�'' Z � a , Sec. 24 lying N. of �i�100 N .,�
.� �,� r r� � 9 , rZ� right of way �_
� RE f L �mt - . _ _ __ _ _ g
___ __._. _______ J � R
►�3 �_� . --
� z ti � �s
�� 4 ' \ N4 f �~s �
r C M ��Z V � �
_ �,I
-.'_ -___
4 - � --
�
T E 4
'i
� o R f T� , ?, 2 / �;/
��� , ' 7 �
SKYWUO(J IANC %l.E. . � 40 39 /"� �� . . :;
p � �UAfl ; MATTER �. a C . � 34 33 � V � . .. `�`"'
CJ�. lYV.--•7� / 4i �' 38" - �;
c
s . � �35 � 4 �
5 4+ti• r� `<��t�id.�'.i...:�'+fb t �� � 42 V 37 3c 23 ' -__
'/4�/�f' ' - #'E. s--....:-.— - - - - � L , � .-.. ... . � - � -. 3i .�- - .-� . -- - -- �-., " .� -- -. '_ . , . . �.
e s 2 /9 �-�-...
Z�' 0 q.`'. ze tz , z� to• ie IB 17 16 IS ia i3 5h30 '
,s ' Po a. ' ia � � yQ i� i 2 3� ,
. . F"' i7� � . /t7� , 3. . _ � Q � . 3 29 27 !? . B .
?' 1/ z � I � ia 4 12 _ .
,. � �� .�Z,+ 7 � k r '� Z`�? .� i 5 6��/��� 8 /� 2 i I I J8 T� "�"
'��21 /4 ' ' �L• � �1 � e �
i1 � F 13 � 0 8. 9 � O I �
u � 2 � � z 4 � � � (�Y (-� �
','S a Z 3 p `/ TR��-1-�p Y, ` 8 9 O�4 �g 16I .t7 6 Q 7
�� MI _r "•i�,•� �, g . �g �LL1�--- (i., fi_ �
;4� 25 = ;/ �1 a� _ 7 ' �p �� -- v
� � �� . � " � '� , S d 9 I i �` i S s..
�'! i S N S .' ihN (� � O�^ . 0� � I 2 �.� g � 5 � .
\ . � J _ 7 �,` ? �, q SUi�iQ , . 3 2 *
9� .'`- b � g 2 4� ti . -' I 4 � , _ . �: y. .
� � Z,,_.= , e � � �.. N
28 e��� �' G�ACIER N ?� � � � 2 3
,, , � ' ' ' a 3 ,,�. � io � E z 2
�► ` !
., i jJ /� ��n ,�' nu7cos0 /D� 1 I� � 1 �. � 9. J T 6 5 4 I..t � � j.
.• . •
Y ' ,.LIMfiS ` � �
R - , J . �., .
�
• � �I
PEMTOM, INC. • 8053 BLOOMtNGTON FREEWAY • BIOOMiNGTON, MINNESOTA 5542Q • PHONE 888-9561
December 31, 1968
r'1
Fridley Planning Commission
c�o Mr. Darrel Clark,
- Assistant Engineer
Fridley City Hall
6437. University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is our application for rezoning of that part .of
SE 1/4 of Sec. 24, T 130, R 24, lying north of Interstate
694. It is our understanding that the Planning Commission
will meet on January 23, and we hope that a public hearing
on this matter could be scheduled for that date.
Our application is fos "PD" zoning. Although we have not
built in Fridley before, we have accomplished several
sizable planned developments in other'Twin Cities commun-
ities having PD provisions in their zoning ordinances.
We are very much in favor of the PD approach to urban
�,.� growth, and we are pleased that Fridley has included a
PD section in its ordinance. We think, however, that
certain aspects of the Fridley PD section wou2d pose
enormous and perhaps insurmountable difficulties for us
in the development of the pa�ticular tract with which we
are concerned. These difficulties stem from two fact5:
1. The size of the tract.
The property contains approximately 120 acres in
Fridley, plus an additional 30-35 acres in New Brighton.
The development of such a large area would no doubt
reguire sev�ral years. We do not think we can adeq-
uately project the public's needs and tastes in housing
for such an extended period, and, therefore, do not
feel we can provide a detailed development plan for
the entire area at this time. Until architectural
designs for future buildings have been drawn, we would
not be able to designate ".location,. gene�al exterior
dimensions and approxzmate gross floor areas of all
proposed buildings". Nor would we be able to designate:
�
Fridley Planning Commission
c/o Mr.' Darrel Clark,
� Assistant Engineer
December: 31, 1968
Page Two
the location, arrangement and number of parking stalls;
location and dimensions of pedestrian entrances, exits
and walks; standards for exterior finish, etc., all of
which are required under the present ordinance before
any construction may begin. We think it would be pre-
mature at this time to attempt to provide such a det-
ailed design for the total area. In addition, this
unique site involves a fantastic amount of planning
and architectural time and expense which would be
inpracticable to incur without some assurance from
the City of Fridley.
2. The option on the pro�erty.
We do not own the property but together with Bor-
Son Construction Company, have an option for purchase,
and we have arranged mortgage financing with which to
exercise the option. The mortgage companies, of course,
will not place the financing for our purchase of the
�, land without some assurance that the City would not
oppose the kind ot development we intend to undertake.
Satisfaction to the mortgage companies on this issue
would have to be accomplished prior to the expiration
date o� the option. Under the pr�sent PD zoning pro-
visions in Fridley, there is no assurance as to what
type af land use will ultimately be approved on land
zoned PD. Such assurance apparently is not obtained
until a detailed development plan for the entire area
is approved. As explained above, the size of the
tract makes a detailed development pl.an impractical
at this time. Perhaps a Planning Commission and .
Council resolution or statement of intent regarding
future land use could be obtained in our case.
�
These are the principal problems we are faced with in our
progosed development in Fridley. We hope that you will
appreciate the difficulties we are faced with, and we
would be grateful for any development suggestions, proc-
edural recommendations, or any other assistance you may
�•
r''1
/'1
�
Fridley Planning Commission
c/o Mr. Darrel Clark,
Assistant Engineer'
December 31, 1968
Page Three
be able to offer. We wish to cooperate with the City in
every way; however, because of the difficulties described
above, we do not see how we can meet_the present ordinance
requirements for the development we propose.
One approach to PD zoning which has been used successfully
in other communities, and which would solve our problems,
is as follows:
1. For large trac�s the developer submits a general
plan for the entire area. This plan shows only suc�i
items as principal streets, types of land use, and
residential densities. Thus it shov�s the internal
traffic pattern, the relationship to exteriox exist-
ing streets, and the relationships of the various
land uses. It shows`how the proposed development
would relate to existing development and the City's
Comprehensive Plan, but no construction details are
specified.
2. If the City disapproves the proposed land use or
other features of the general plan, it rejects the plan
(or it ma�r grant approval contingent upon certain mod-
ifications.)
3. If the City approves the �eneral plan, the developer
must then provide a detailed plan for the particular
portion he wishes to develop at that time. This det-
ailed plan must be for the specific land use already
approv�d in the general plan. The detailed plan
must show bu'ilding locations and dimensions, parking
lot designs, pedestrian walkways, and any other eonst-
ruction details the City may require.
4. If the City disapproves the detailed plan, the dev-
eloper must amend the plan to the sat sfaction of the
City or design a new and satisfactory plan for the
same land use.
5. If the City approves the detailed plan, building
permits are issued for construction of that portion.
29
i
. . � • � . . . . , .
30
- Fridley Planning Commission
c/o Mr. Darrel Clark,
� Assistant Erigineer
Decemher 31, 1968
Page Four
Construction of subsequent stages is handled in the same
-- :manner, that is, by submission and approval of detailed
plans for those areas.
That, briefl.y, is one way in which PD zoning can be appl.ied in
a workable manner to very large tracts. There may be others,'
. but the above is one with which we have had personal exper-
ience. It seems to have worked out well for the municipal-
ities, ourselves and the residents. We have had excellent
� relations with the municipalities in which we have warked,
and we look forward to an opportunity to prove worthy of
your canfidence and support. We hope that some adjustment
can be made in your present ordinance to give us that oppor-
tunity. Any consideration that you give this matter will
be gratefully appreciated, and we will do all we can to coop--
erate with the City on this and any other issues where we may
be involved.
Very truly yours,
� PEMTOM, INC.
;
chkla�
_ Robert E. Engstrom
Vice President
REE/Cj
r
CI�Y,OF FRIDLEY
^ MINNESOTA
PLANNING AND ZONING FORM
Number �-� /-� � (� �f � C'�
�% _ /'/ /i���
TYPE QF REQUEST
- X
� Rezaning
Special Use Permit
Variance
31
APPLICANT' S S IGNATURE,�,�k�.%�f,�!T� 6CE'- �/�st� �, Lat Sp I i t s
Address 2415 Foshay Tower Approval of Pre-
-. .
' liminary Plat
Telephone Nucnber �32-8921/ 339-1074
_ _ Apgroval of_Final
, Plst
PROPERTY UWNER! S SIC�ATATt1R� . - :
_ __ _ . _ _ _
_ . _ Streets or All�y:.
_ Addrese Vaeations
_ _ Telephone Number > Other _-__ ,_
Street I,ocation of Property 1490-1530 (approx. ) Onondaga Street NE
. Legal Description o% Progerty North 2 Lot 30, _ North 2 Lo�t 31
_ _ _ __ _
_ _ __ _ .- _
� Auditor's_Subdivision No. 129
: City of' Fridley
Present 2oning Classification Residential
Existing Use of the Property Vacant Land
,,� Proposed Zoning Classification, Special Use, Variance or other request
_ . -, � . , . - � , ,. ,, _ MULTI PLE ( same as South 2 Lot 30 )
Describe briefly th�_Type of Use and the Improvement Proposed �ne and two
bedroom apartments
Acreage of Property 3, 6( Approx, ) -
° Has the Present Appli.cant Prev�o�usly Sought to�Rezone; P�at, Obtain a LoC Spiit, --•
Obtain a Varianee or Special`Use Permit on the Subject Site or Part of It? No. :
_ When?
: _. _ _ _ .. � _
What was Requested Fee Enclosed $`�•�
/`� . —
Date FiledJanuary 21, 1969 Date of Hear�ng
!� rz_ � � q-S C,� S'� .
• iG
� GEORGE M. NELSON - ZOA �'�69-02
N� L. 30, N� L. 31, A.S. ��129
Rezone from R-1 to R-3A
, � r -----., , _
� 3�
P���G L�K
S N E CORNER
. ...,�,. � - _ _ .SEC. /?
, _� vs: s .. „
� n� �r s ! r.aw� „ '�� w' u'�� � L � ioe ico ' ioo� ������ �` �_i�. d sJn�r..ck.ron:nt � ��,lG� _
�p ° ° �2 a, I . n !•�� ��7���� f///✓e� �
�1 , 9 :; �O� // � W ? :tFSt�.� j ■• ` I; ' j �, F�, � l'/� ,
� � B � � : /3 � � ' /7 ; Z : ,�, : � � cc �\ `� �" ?''; EzA�6 C–�`v� N�'— ; v'�
� � 1 � � i�;._� • : . � �+i ` , ;
� /8 � /l ` /G i �'`"i g«';:. � ' /6 3 � �22 N -Z/ ` 20 3 TY Z �' ' �. `�`; i�c _�.��^ ..
� w o
� °' � � r�-.�"' . .
=1,., ' I °j � �
n � i ��;. `/ �� .i+.r I .NO I '
� �; � :�- • ,s ; ¢ � W ,.. .ti , � ,9 . � � � . , �.�
' i 6� 5�+ � �. e rsr�s ssiy �B ��� ti �� �
� 9 ,�i,,.,. �E!",1 � /�i ts ��� � /�i � 5 � ~ �� '¢ h'�' � � � .3 � 2 ^ l
,
�T � _ :,:� ss �
L ' �is /A(J{ U'�I� �� x . 6 �. /.o � s,..] . 1r i (f� �
� �S ,� Zg ;, 3 ? t.u__�[ W ° /8 �G S �� �'� ,E � ls+�
� - ,. , �
�,.� '.,w � •�• 5..,. 0 � /2 7 � (;�
24a' '�', - 2 � R a E. : M- � � � ; McKINLEY=ST. '
�) i ' �
! � � , m � n B � . � � . � � . �. .u.s ff �isj.. '� � . .
r . 4 +°�c � � ,� �i^ f.L -.�� , � � � . /?.....__.,,_ � � 6 � , (°� ' :✓C � 9 .
''� 23 �.e � _'j'Jp� �� , � s�s .,,,�� : 9 .w,"• �e'n�. f • iu � "� �'-{-v�1si �
� �. . �^! S� : y'� . . � . •• l0 a.uY �' � � . . . , f .
♦ r ffJl �, ffl/. i.� .. . � �y •
Y Y � �Y n�y � Y ' 1 h. . /6 0 7 .. I� �� � S \ � ; .
�3tVENtIE�` N:E--- � .,., o
�� _ • .
� ; , m s s"'� , � ` �e ,
n.:, .,,r� �
+rA+se � h /J ' ° A /'���i Q� °�' � : /3 , 6
, ..,.:
.,� _� ` r.:: � nr rft• rfa ..
' J � ss� r
"� � f�a U, . I�t� . ti ��} �v 2 /2 ' 6 ���•
� .
1 � y t � /4' I I �¢/' EI" ' W o j �•
': `.� � •,, ,,. r � ti�� �' �= _ � , � �'l�y
y: zsf v n : y °s. e = o
� 2 i'� •. � o�stss / 1 � � ,_ • � • W r�sn � is, :s S 2 ....•-
N " � � ' i 3 � � Y � � `�'� �!�i` i � �� � �
+` ' �' fi 2 � ^.' (l=s� /� - � � ��0) Q Qj, 'i' ` � , 3 �''��
N a� W . fo 3 rvs , �,�a�+.�acc ` ' ;° � °° Q -- ��� z ts �� J ° t �{� � '�. ��fis f x9� »�...+ti
wi r � E v. V� O. �;/��,• ..� —��� . . . �y�4 � i � � �'1� . .�.
�! v h p �
f 4 a s� 4 $�,OT. �� Q O V• i ti /Z' l'' ; / ""v� •^�-t r Y` 3 i� % , �
.
.�.: „ �`17 � �, 's�, m�� � ,0 1 sr i�i�v ..si 2f�� Eflro t`.."
� � ... , • , � ' �rir.. w
� Tt "/!2 {7•- �1 ,L i
�--�.r.=—PIS�PSifTSr' +".�'��-V�7t"{__JV°l�—�-R �� -il�^�."R- ,/% �I�'�lf�y--,7,-�;-- . _....
�� 1 . . •+x'1R N . Y:/f lf ds 7Y R �
y�. �ii y:�• . � . . .. . �' ^.` . �J fe -� . � � .
' � f�� . � .. � � �. ' . � (!4! . . � 'i�. � �o'� ..� � .�d•
�, j lr�� = A.�in �> l 2 � 3� V~i �. � M 2 3
9 � • , N.N.dn ' � � sRO ,a �c S
�: . � 2 ` (�°°) (�'Z� � dy ; �u N.d �» ^� .
� W . ,. 8 �te/ � � . � ': %¢ •. � /� �`����� 4�:.
z 23 � �; � � �y j
3 g `,., G.mJ �,. n,-� t: N�J � :�s; /3 :���It s '. /3 �•' '`�,
,w• +�f..yr '. ._ �,.: - . 6 � - ; - ` !` V l • i::�+5 .
... l M :S4 'r.� f66+� N A + . . �ti �1 .YI a0 ��_ � � / l 3
L4 '
VE' �, +' . '��. ` e ' O � °;.„. a � �z�� 6 a � �� :. ±._;
.:.irr sr�,: � '� 4G '1 I �, ( � ...io �' � . �,
, � ,f 5 "�" ce 1�-- � O� � e ^O// �: 7 • Y �� o • _� ..
� 6 = R. `,[�, • �� ' 0 ��p� <1 V : / : � � � '•�: y
r ,.. �"'°> �` �,' � �;� � ` �' � 4 3 '� .. ,s ., ,,,�., a 1 .., .� :
� M • M I' �,s� � Q� �� � Abafl I �. � . 9f �.' Jf� . I .7J ._ ... ..
• B 9 / • , `3 �► � � d�.~/��+ '. /o � 9 B . �o a 9 J B �..
• O � 2 I �
� , acro) :� \ � �' �
� n �i i a : .. n � »�r �"s ` s yd I ;�� t� ���� f' t •• �•
+ � � i �_ �+' � ' •" M !
� , 'o '�. : � � � . . ....
ON tJ�AGA M STR�EET ro w ""-�—fr---�"u�ifz�`',`�.
;
.., ; r;,• •• � I �.a ..o .�o : .
I• �(7)Sn)' �l1J �J . � .; . .
'� �sql
� s . � 33S ' 6DIVISION I I r.� �,ne i I � 7 . . ., . .. ,
'.�� ir��].a�] r.�./d� � �ro:a�J` �/ri..Q� Q �. i
�%►'� 'i... (73:c) � . LG� �; .��T�� �v..��.�v~�' . �. � �u/� _ � . - � �N� � � �. � � �
. _� .., . ____
,w,,,,, � � 3� . . . � M �: ----
. _ ° 8
�� ; . .
� ..� ' r3i�i
,_., :..� � � 4 «,�v : � �:sd � , r,�«+ �_ ,
� � ,, , _- , �� a.�,,.� f 32 �► ; �--_
'lh,K � �� ,....c».wr.' . . . "."� � xr �wa . W.. . r . � .
4 6 —
xw f_„�.,. a_'fs> S � 6D. «°'
�,�, ,,.�.p:�� � l�i.,:�'�'Ei� t' ', G�
^ Q` � � -� - �sni �rAoi'rMr ! � ' I �
� P,i J�ir e (�� , i Ma.ndi i - . ��. � . .
,
w I ,�s�H�! e (�sl�i 9a�) (�•)ti ,
�,,� ,- -°�F. 23 25 � 27,29� . � . N 129 ; -. ! w� '._«,� «�� _
��1. ' ; I � I� i I
�,� ,•,� ' �s�o� . - I I I N0� 108 �
��`� �.._
. . _ . .. . . .. . � _ . . ,� � �.
- - � --- - -- ---- - ---...... _ . .
3�-HtGH1',`AY--NO. S- -`�- ?�3 RE?---=AdE:— - N. E. � Eii4 coaN£R
. sec. ia
3�
CITY OF FRIDLEY TYPE OF REQUEST .
• MINNESOTA .
�..� ' . �_„_,_Rezoning ___
Y%ANNZNG AND ZONING FOFtM
� P.S. �69-A1 -- ��^��� Special Use Yermit
Number
1" � Variance
APPI.ICANT' S STGNATURE `---�� •"z-.-�_.��> �( ��-� �,-z-_, :.�.: -,.,
. _____„�Loi Splits
Addxess 3425 �=oolidge St. N.E. Mpls, Minn � ppproval of Pre-
_ M
Telepit�ne Nvmber 781-2611 liminary Plat
- - - - _,_ _ X
. _APPraval of Final
. P2at
YROPERTY OWNER' S SIGNATU�tE� � `���„_, ��' ,�.��t�,' ���
Address � � <�=��L.-s�^ � " , , • ' �,,,,Streets or Alle�.--..__
..-�,L�� �:, p�' ctc.! Vacations
Telephone Number � (:r' 'L'� �� � . ' Other
Street Location of Property
--
� Rear 431.6 ft. af Lot 35 and rear 401.9 ft.
Legal Description of.Property�� Lot 33, Ric��x Revised Auditor's Sub. �77
, � , .
Preseat Zoning Classification R-1
_ �
• Existing Use vf the Property Vacant
_ - • ---�.-�..: �
Proposed Zoning Glassification, Special Use, Variance or other request
Plattin _
Describe briefly the Type of Use and the Improvement Proposed 8 single 'family
residencial lots
Acreage of Property a�prox. 2.5 acres
.
Has the Present Applicant Previously Sought Co Rezone, Plat, Obtain a Lot Split,
Ob�ain a Variance or Special Use : Permit on tiie Subaectr Site or Part of It? No
Whea?
—��
ir�ta.t�. was Requested Fee Enclased $',,r, c;�
^ t#ate Filed � : . Date of Hearing . _ �
�S�-�� � 4�S(-,�-•�
. �° �e . � �� ��� � �� �
� l�
� � . 34
C!T Y OF FR/OL EY -
' � Brentwood�Estates - P.S. ��69-01
Rear 431.6 ft. of L. 35 & rear
� �. '401.9 ft. of L. 33, A.S. ��77
� , a �
� , � n s.H � �
I . � \ � � +� � � �'� J�—
', � a.
,r A '
1 °:
, � 3� �'� ;`'' �,�,`',- _ a
� � � . v .._
, y
r
�
. �� � � � iir � `� �
' • s� / � . 7 + �e.. r..�
' ....... ` 5�e` " $ �.Zw.:...� g � _,, . _... . ._.. I
{ r . f r � �' ' _� ILl _, nLt _ . _1ld.t . vr .�i ' _ _ - _ i)f.sT--.,,---'-- -
i �.i � a'.. .� ':S�sv � %;- --• • �70� �FOS� �. ° ��� �i
. ,• 4` �= 6 .. .� '� �l
�jfj I �
. . . . 7i. . . � � �U�jily�� � 1 �' { , � � y�. � tl . �e . . :ss�s �. ± .
• ' i � � . x 9 , ^ , ., f 3 2 a / h � (rd $ � ,> �t', �'
, , ` V , _ , �� ,, ' � ` ,�� c .. :: + " Z
r:o.-. d � ♦ il
. � r . � �� - - O ( 3 ql
,,,,. � .u. , � 1'y � ti. __.t'.,. w� a
. . . . . : ,rtT . . 5!.; : !l: � ,. . x. ' ,7A1 .. � ,ar.s -,v.s I � ..,t � , .r � ,/l.t . � � 't a" �
� ' ' "_'. �t _�..� �J. � !R;](� ��1sV- � i 1- SN.I . ���� .
� 9 y��; .�...: �:s � � LOGAM �' � :3 -
' � ' , r , y , : "' � i �� .ae ..o ' ,„, -� �„ PKV'!Y. ` � :e re w � __ �,:. � U—
� � � 'Z'��.va" �. � �. I � I . e �1 � �, a
� � ....� fg j 20 ; � . �, � 2 � -- �- -
' �r�..'' ��: :�� � '�I j/ � 22 . I3 �. Z�I y' IS • 1� 2' � c?' W' �N. r 4 s'
- I ��., ,� , _�� � � � � �d 1� °r > ,
. � / � . � � �.�r v�,' 1� " ic•�fti�Y E- � � . . � .� Q � �ixs�
�� � � + ./ ; �1/w DZ 2�e.v ��..� . . ei�� ` � - .✓Ns�w � �C M' � ��
�,� }i��sis� 7 .��' � ''��f, . - � m. J�., �,
� � \ � � �,
_.. : p .�,v �
� .._., _ . ' �� : �- .3 '�K .�...
� � �i � / •.��1 -�t� � Ye,� z q *'�.� � � / �� � ��. - y // ��: .
.� , r _ 2 y: / �:....i � . lli. J� N.
`'. r �r Q . a: e� ���'--�I .t . .�''� ; ; a /2 � ti
. I � .�� 5,�. �7 � - f �w�Y~�� � ' � � r � �� - X.l
7 ti� ti �i � ✓3
� � � . . I •�� �-. . "'��• i�v� j ♦. JQ . . 1 �.'j . •-/ry 3 . . �. ...�� T .
. . . . � _ t - 1� � � � �� . .; . . v . . �� � �,�� �g � .
. .. � �1 -� . . . � . � - . . �
s I
�.� ,� ` .,.,`_ .._ l ;+a 3� 'r` `� '�° ' �� ''
.. - i : I� w �. . � �+ran) y � � � 1 �K . � . '�
U^ - . . . �`� _ � . N � `f �. �. .i/f. J dI I .
� � � � .� �. Q ` z 30 , ,� ,� � .aEY A�E _
,
i a 3 a �-- � -
� � . a �j�.'��,y-.i_ 'a. � ,� •.r S .r. �a. I rc� �
i i' $a-��•�•.e : lr,J �� , 2 (�aa�) � a'. �� y '� " �iqir�s -
i �� ". F- �,+ �'� ; K � -�.,,� '� � -
� y� 4 S� 29 �ncf Ab - �. t� .ii ` j
� . J i ; � ..,.� - `,.,. a ,,.�N��`°�. °�R,�VE�Y'✓OOD •., .I y' �„3 � ' �
__ � . � .�' _ . ? � �w: � .. n�`�����/Y�,/Fi/� � .. ~ 5� 3�rss---� ; ,
�
,� s , W " `� '�� � SCHDOL. �,� �`� �y �� ,s: .. �� 9'..7 �� .�
. � / . � , � � � � � �� _ — � f _. .. . � ��
r� � 3 �a i�ttt� �.� �� t, � v� y, 7i. ss ,�.
�•, w R E V %'S E D � '� .� �, � , a �
� � J � ,` Z% I ..S ' \ ' J».0 I '
i i ... � �,. :� � z , � %' �, Z ti � a � �.�.., -
i = � � �o ,.,, � � z,�, ,,, �, .
� �;�•�. , ,
� .i � /,�� ! �� ._1�._ ^yy Je' � .�r�,., 9p_� >llr.. - rnn h� x �. a..
. . . ' •�.�...4�777 .�.'.. ne... 1 � ;� ���" � � ..r1 . � �' -, � ; .
ir d✓v av� a � e• ���` •• /
. . f; . . . _ . �` - - R•w'�. �� `p 1 i � � +
�'/ /�/�/J �/ ,,, r . r Zr `. .
;, e �� �".� V 0� +/J�J�i/Y ���4�* � rF _. _+�„ _ � s�;,� � ' _�{ : �: f.�r"• � �j'
` � ,ili � 9 � /o Ri // � /s P /3 � /4 Z /S t2 /G` � � a '• kICKORY= - ,. r _ � i�
ei � �tn
/� : 1 � '� � .. � 1�' +v. .y , v�
. ` ..w/t "i.... ' •��s , •. } � t w n..�iriwJ� .� �i , . �� _�_...1 ' �_� s.
�. , y,' ; ._.___._ .�-..__ � �'��_'�__'iJ r �.. s,.• ssr „: �� �._ 'A . 4� ORIVE= C . �
f rs ��� _ : �� �. �� .. ::
i - • ..;' �t--
' c 1 ss t � y 1� � �, �i � ,� -�� %
- = � i� � i. � . . �, . �/. :� . � ,. _ ... - �-:'•''« "'... .' y �£C:i . �:n✓� �. .�� .� . �2 1 �i� ` y 1 �.4.
. � . ���� . '- r� ' � i 1 ��5 � f�V •'' -- f_-iC-t-s _ � �){��,--'T��--r-` �._ i-= 1 �.= 4 I 1. l
_. , . �-.', . _ . , - «` ,' , - _ - - � - . � � a� �r I?�,+' , � ,� f.a{'ea i ai'w,s8, u''i� �.
_.� � � ��. .� 1 ---- - .. - '� -"' _ ! • ��
� . . � - - r }. � i � � a %i� �-- .x-� vr � r .
._ L- _ _ _ _.'.�.r' 1 ..'� p N � y _ ;�i���b �,�< . � / 7
..Y.. � ytr y - _
. . . . j i 1 � � � � �r�, ym MCiiiar . _ _. . . i �1 . .
F - - -r� - --- /y--- `
,� . - -- - t �. - . • a s...-. >.�.�' -t� . _ .� r E, s., • �+ �f�, j 1 �✓ ¢. + � ��A rrr =`` y-
- , � _ _' ,. .. . •------' ----- �� •�
_ r/ -:, � irs� . �. c s t'•
' - -1 ; ..R ' .�" '`!'i. ~ it�--'� a r - is ���tP '% /! i � w yJ-cf„l.+rf./ s � ta �.�� d ,��� .i �� o ��
r w . � � W . •'a �� '---- /� �r _ --ti � ,i �. s•� a� s u ,- ` .�• . ...,
�l � ia ^ I .� i/ ' `^i - -"�'i{ --'/-�� p ��'Y.%/ [:' lrm� �/j�., .t /y,.;'� al,�` �,
� �I ti ( �l � 1 � . �� ' � �7 t � � �I � J •j /� .K.lf�nr�.rcAi.wr /'3..i+1. 't�J4:�� .Y '��� � r
� �. � .M1��.�'�:,:`_�T,��y*_�__, -_�_ j��,_.:_--� ,--'r--�.,i/ .c'.. �,�'..�o ....�.Fr,.,`!.,•,�•i�- w =1::. ; r`
t
� 'r - � �r - r `- 'r _' ` _ <Y1�. � - - -- � =E' � . ,•+�''v. s, � Y , . I .
1YAY _w---.•r' :c
� � o ' i 70MN�-�cw-. .• - ! � F� � Z -�
-I� � S.. _'__ L 1^__.�^r��.� _�_T_ ___.__{I 7 /'✓ Y,,'. '. • �� . . � .�� l �.F_.
� t i'_ _ ?I° _ _ �- ' _ t � � ` �M' / / � " /+ • � c� �3�f : � � . i
/ i � < i s ' .... `
■�����♦ i _ .s __ Y �" • �.�, af . .a � s_21. • < +1 �a� � � f ..•,.
__ \ / . . _ � r _ _ • � ''p _ _ �� _ _._ _ � . ' � � y, � "� / . .. 4�r'� � l �� -� - -r�- J .� � ..2 � i�. ,S r ' .'�^���{-.
Y � r ! ' , • . ���. . ';� . . = a� ..." . k ;� ..� �
� I,'� � -_� _ _�L�� ---- �' � -{�l� . s� .��. � � %� . � rn__ •sa�j� �i ! �• J - `y�' � w.s...r-i �a..•
( ♦ I ` Js I f ;� � � /!'"� / � � ^ y' � s J�� /� (,rw �� " }� n � /� �:
/ 4 j
` . � .. __. 1 " r_"�_ _.__ T�\ . � � +s,. ~,~ •�� � d�R�` �i M�� Y. �D'�� O� %J� i - � ~.
� � J I i� _tib �•��� � � � O JA•Vp`,_ .
,� � �r� - tr� . _ 1� ^� �'�� \ %. � :�y i. ��s 'I-_evr..'�� V� —�.r: .f i. �
. _ �•? � — ✓% r . aj ;� `)/�,�D � a . f�k,� .
,�; . . . . , � � t t: -_� _ .,�! 6., .....1 1 ---, �� ` � � . � 1.��� :�� " �:.t � r� o .ak✓ :,, �� •� d+'�•tirr� � .
. �� y• � �� fJ, 'hI_'-� .v- y, �., J� �.. d a.1. � ••..i„�.,..,.4 ' ��r �t ��' '� ,y. ..���..
�' A c
.ti�__.- ___'__ __ � • b � / I �'yf �� „'/!__� yH . • \ �` �
' , -�--- ,''�" '—�` —� ---- � �J ` i�+.�� �i�• OR� s' �.��_•''--I '.r t �O�'�� ���, -
� y :�
t .�' '_7� � T_ 1 iJ �_ar. i' /C'�, ^r '�' i x^ r .4'A i' a"
< _ _ „
,�
r'1
+3J�
CITY OF FRInLEY
MINNESOTA
PLA1�i1�TING A1VD ZONING FOFM
Number Z0A #68-11
TYPE OF REQUEST
X Rezoning
Special Use Permit
_ Variance
AFPLICANT'S SIGNATURE Lot Sp2its
ouis Momc ilovic
Addres�0.����,r ing Str_PPt„� F �Tn1 c_ Minn : 5541,8 Approval of Pte-
liminary Flat
Te2ephone Number 789-SOSS
� Approval of Final
Ylat
PROPERTY OWNER' S SIGNATiJ1tE �
Louis Momchilovich Streets or Aliey -
Address ,�p�� H�'din� S�,rp,p��j:F_�nl,�.� Minn. 55418 Vacations
Telephone Number 7 8 9- 5 0 S 5 Other
Street Location of Property Sn��th of Mi ss; sci�y�i StreP� a�;d East o Hwv. #65
Legal Description of Property West 47 feet of the South 120 feet of Lot 10,
Auditor!s Subdivisi,on #88
Present Zoning Classification R.,�
Existing Use of the Property VaCant lot
Proposed Zoning Classification, Special Use, Variance or other request R-3 A
Describe briefly the Type of Use and the Improvement Proposed
Acreage of Property
- ---- - Has the Preaent App�ic-ant-���vic��sly�-Sought ta-Rezo�e,•-Pl�at, Obtain a Lot Sp�it, - ---•� --
-' � Obtain a Varisnce or Speei�l Use Permit on the Subject°Site or Part of it? °-
When?
�th,at was Requested Fee Enclosed $�
� � . DaCe Filed . . . . Date of . H�.r�ng. . _____ —
�
- �� "�..._ :.; a . . ' � � ;'""_T_ : _ ! .'o. � •
. . �� 's.s z'' ,��q ' /!3�" ' llSv: j It�f7v • ;•..��Q i �.�to ����'�' � r•
� � � `)
(�e 7C � � b ' w; � �� � � : •
� •,�00 l��O 1� O' 'f (? , 11 �� .-:.! �lrs`s*f«. Ai �`i i1s ; ` �
� � � D ♦ % ' I �" , �'�'B�i /J � ' � ♦ -
;. �'� �� �1 , q' '--f�--- (Ji � . a.. -
, j ° j • • .�, -:=�`�; � � s ,sh% _. .__=.o--� ;,o .rv_.� �+!n
. � '` �r.� �i .r/: � w ( - c " ito
,x. �. � , g , �s��> . �.� a- ��►�� � -
�'' -"�''�--''" • � _- E�„- 1� =u,, . �- � �f -t� ��
• - -
.._ ' ��,_ �� . S ,� �
�� -.�, , �'` � ' 1 , , •6: ,y � , . --g - — r — _ ! c. <<�� _ :1Q. _ •
� �� aR��_ r .� � �. ,�����o�s ��c�� .. �r3� - - _ �-.
�� A U QIT, R S ,,.. �,�o� e 2� e�'�'`'' v�:
� �,�a p. � .� ------_: � . . .,• ,,:sc .r��i�e�d�o� • •, _("'�� •>"
.✓ � _ ree) O �r/w j O.Ji�t a �t-- f�/Zo_
__-- � � �..,. �� a .
y .. .;,: � � �aa,� � Z = - - a ` .� � `
sr. `'��`�s Ll? >a , ,; z ,*:�' : YiZol. � 6� t��a �,
t_...
:- --r„'--- --�- -- � t��,�1=� , �.. : �;=��� (. ,g,o� t �s -��f �'�`� 1 __ � t� t
a � w� I:•�'.-A• I/K id�I✓ + I� i,j?'y t 1
"f ;, « 6�� ; ° 13 .,. a . 2� � �a��5. � e w�
: �� � •=s_� i. .� `;,,,: ' ;f• � �' � *c V
r� `� /'� c: :�_.__ ��~'v 1
...� � ' .. 1: � V� .: ! 1 l . . � �%" � � w. � ft. 7. .:�, . . �� �. �. _. _'♦ .
:: ' : ; , e,. �....�.. ., •� .4,,_ « � r
; �` Y ` " � j! y� i ���G . . � ) � , :�:��� U.t ,,
)t.fl J=.� 1 N • ;�� ' � � «. �...
9 � � , � G`���:, --�.:. ,..� _ to _ _..1� � ct,
'' � t G '� ``" - „— ' Z G3� .93 g �° ' --1 ��3 f �' G3�tr � �
i� ' lo3S lo3g 105! � , e�.Y � : � .�Q ��� : ��� _: �S ; 9
:
� �- ^•�� -z �_ "• ' � { � � _ 1 _ lO.� : C? �so _ _ t _ 1��? . . ,
�' . • :� . u, -- �3?P y. ��?Q 1 � �
CH V�. N. E. � `; �. ,-� � . �3�4)�/ ' z �� o �P'
.'e , !O .' �. 'l� �1 � � `� . . . �y . � . v ! Y' . . !u f - . �� r1 --- ��� � 1t.
�� L,L. Js.� _ � � - -
O , h
�°E�-t� � 2; fi`�`� ��• � r � 3,��.,� j��"� �`� 2 �{ :� i=-- ;
,
�, -� � s '`��f c,:
;; . � `� : t },W,,, ��o�J . ` �3�1s- ' �._ c. tF . �� �
�, �� 6 . �
!o s L.,.....� � 1 � V 3 �� � 5 � �z � �e '-./.1 s. o �
0 •�e• .
.. � e . S �,{'� . . +"� . � . fJ�:� . � a
� �V D , tn '� si��3 �. ° � �
�11 � . .tft f- � � _ `���� � �
sc �F►..� � ` � 4 :
� . . . ' � '—j�•.z', 1 ��g7�������`� �9,��' R., � e C:.:
1 -��t'� . ~,.
r, � .. �,,,, ,rs•�:. _ t. � .,r . �
.•
" � 314 � � (,3�� - �►3��` ' `,.��B � - ' '''w. $ ...�j'' ,
• � �t _ � � � '' ss, '`�� �
T � "fe s c�,. _ . > � 'f • � ,J . � I!' _ �• --- �.+ l ` � �
, �'c1 �' � . . � '' _ _ � , / ��t w � ��; � � ' ` /,�� 4 • � {i
• ,ro� . , y , , �O + � = �\
'"' /�' e . J
. 2 �d_ • . . ; '� e i/. 1. ` . . � � +�. �:i i ,L q`�/s .
� •. ' � (�'� ��.
� --- -�-- -�� '` -- • -�-- � . � �S3 �i�. �� _-•-. r -' �?�`-� ur ..
"�, � � �
.. _�_ � - , , • ,
.o -.o - .. �''� a' •
` o' J
� ; ' - : . : � '�
� s � ^ �.i/I! �>O. fini t F` r...—�-'-� t �/��� • j � ��0� r • �Ci�� . iW. . .9e � l �� � r 9,s .
� �Si �. . . • �s .y� . ' . •
� �s � r t � � �y � �, . Z . , � .
. � /,�. , .: AI i - �� t. � � i . (/���j /�j � 0 �
�� • +•� 1 � .� / i i � � l 'J
♦.IiI'�k� � ♦ � I. l � J
. " - �1.�4o i _ ,.� - . ti
J � ._
� r z" _ � . : --• � ` a� �i .�, `.
� . ?`�' •.�� � LOUIS MOMCHILOVICH ZOA ��68-11 �
q � � _��f ... . . � D . ��
e � L'r r;� W. 47 ft. of S. 120 ft. of L. 10, �' �/.
.{ ; CL. •�� � 1" � � "� 1 A.S. ��88 Rezone from R-1 to R-3A �.�'
' ��j r�A t-
��' � �- � � _ . �� ' �V to be_added to ZOA ��68-04_. _. __ _---_ �s -
.----- -�- --- -
_.
� •IsT 6 � ��� ` , _ - _
------- —»_L,.3o-'--- �.:., �� W ..,..,. ��
�- ��` � ��;pp _ , ��� '�� Auo�ToRs �,��
��: . � , . , . , �,,
_ �-- -. �-y ---- . �-.;� ��:
� . y�� -�
r . �
�4 . • tj . ` + . . �'� . � . � . . . . `
. . . � . . � ' 1r� � t . . � � . . . }M�i� .
� , . .� ° . . " _ r.(�,'� � . . � . . . � . � � � / � + _
.Ip ?t�s� ,�• • .�(;•
`• ;� i
_ :L • - _ �. : �• � �
�KE . DRlVc : : `�' : -- - --.- ---- �`'"
- ... � .�
• � '} _.� ...
� ` . . ' ••.� � _ • • �l . . . . . � � V � . • .
�
. . • " •
� � S♦ . � ••
. �� �
. .
. 1� �
.
', � • . .. _ . �. . .
. .. . . . . . _ .. _ .. .. . .. .
. . . .. . . . . , ,. •. ...
� -��-- - �-- -- - -�-
. M �� E. C�--�,
� �
r�S/6- /�o,rT M G..r � o F 3c.,�,� � �
/�• �S.O _ -45.0-`; �N.W..oC07�NF1t oF �ar/� l3ceCl��
' '� ' � _._-rs:__��_�,
,.
e o ' -.�, .�
� � _..� � --
. � t,�sb ` 2 so_ '_ "1— — ---�-
. . 1 0�' j .
� 'i �s r�4�'' I `. � � ,
' '� `�� � a = 58°�4g' S1�� r
t►' . .�
. ,
f~
l •
� �•
��
� ��
�� �
i�
�� �
i
•
•
' •.
. � ••
�� �•
• ��N�
�'1
�
�
��
�
�jcatE� /"= 5D'
/2-23-GS w�+4
�
R = 23D: 56 �
Y = t 3 0' � .
D� 24.85°
L= 23�.74'
n •
` ,�
� ,
� •:�• '
. � •�• ♦
s � /
� ���• ' .
� '
/
/ ,�
♦ �%�$.
/ io .
� �ti '
��
i• , �h�
d� /^I ` �
•r �•, r r � \.
� `
%
/
/ . �
/!
/
�
� = 58° 49� 51�•
R = 230.56�
T=130�
D = 24:85°
L = 236.74�
.
�
�
Y
�
�
t
a
,
Z
�
N
�
�
• 1
�
� . -------- L-
SAV ��69-01: City of Fridley vacation of portion 1a
, of Hyw. ��65 West Service Road South _,,. �o�
. of 73rd Avenue for Loopback. �
/S'
)
�
,w �
Y•.+
V �
0 4
� �
3 �
? �
W
A
Q �
h
Y+
� �
� �
2 �
� �
� �
�
�
n
W
3
3'7
. ,
0
�"1
�
�
�
OFFIC,IAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
' FUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE T�iE
. CTTY COUNCIL
TO �VHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
sav ��69-oi : vACATZOr� �S
for Laopback on 73rd
Ave.
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing
of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at
6431 Universit�� Avenue N.E. on �ebruary 1Q. 1969,in the Council
Chamber at 7:30 P.bi. for the consideration of the following matter:
Vacation (SAV #69-01) described as follows:
AlI that part of the Highway #65 West Service Dr,ive that
lies West of and adjacent to Block l, Fridley Industrial
Park Plat 1, South of the North line of said Block 1
extended East and North of the follo�ving described right
of `way, a fifty foot (SO' ) strip of land the centerline of
wIiich is described as follows:
Commencing at a point in the North line of Outlot l,
Block l, of said Fridiey Industrial Park Plat l, located
twenty feet (20') West of the Northwest corner of Lot 1,
of said Block 1, as measured along the North line of said
Outlot 1; thence South, parallel with the east line of said
Block 1, a distance of fifteen fee.t (15'); thence South-
easterly,on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of
230.56 feet and a delta angle of 58°49'S1" a distance of
236.74 feet; thence on a line tangent to last described
curve a distance of 8.11 feet; thence on a tangential curve
to the right with a radius of 230.56 feet and a delta angle
of 58°49'S1'' a distance of 236.74 feet and there terminating.
All lying in the South Half (S 1/2) of Section 12, T-30,
R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of l�2innesota.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above
matter will be heard at this meeting.
Publish: January 29, 1969
February 5, 1969
JACK 0. KIRKHAM�
M�lYOR
v.
r (
t '
�
�
�
� _ 39
MEMO T0: Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee
MEMO FROM: Engineering Office
SUBJECT: State Aid Mileage
Gentlemen:
The annual chore of finding new streets to be put on the State Aid
system has again come to your Agenda.
We have opened new �treets this last year entitling us to increase
our allowable mileage by .56 miles.
We recommend that certain streets be taken off the State Afd System
which will add another 1.07 miles to the total of new mileage to be desig-
nated making the grand total of 1.63 miles to be designated.
The streets we recommend be taken off are as follows:
No. 323 - Ashton Ave. from 79th Way to 83rd Way: Because we i.mproved a portion
of the street, we were unable to collect State Aid Funds.
No. 306 - 69th Ave. from Central Ave. to Hwy. ��65: Due to the Medtronic Indus-
trial developing the property on which it would 1ie.
No. 316 - 67th Ave, from 7th Street to University Ave.: Caused by removal of
access to University Avenue.
No. 320 - 64th Ave. from University Ave. to 5th Street: Due to its improyement
without State Aid monies.
The following streets to be considered as possible new routes are
listed aecording to priority with individual lengths indicated.
1. 1.02 Mi. Alden Way, 75th Way, 79th Way combination: Right of ways are
adequate and route is about 80°G improved and will not need any
new construction in the near future.
2. .60 Mi. Rice Creek Terrace and Monroe Street combination: Rice Creek Terrace
R/W is adequate and Monroe Street right of way is 50 feet. These streets
are in good condition and would'not need further improvement for many
years.
3. 1.02 Mi. Rice Creek Terrace, 68th Ave., 7th Street cambined. Could be substi-
tuted for Route i�2 above. Right of ways are adequate with exception
� of 68th Ave. and improvement is possible to occur on 68th Ave. and
7th Street in the near future.
�
���
�
Memo to; plats & Subs.-Str. & Util.
Memo date: January 15, 1969
40
Page 2
4. .80 Mi. 52nd Ave., Buchanan Street, 53rd Avenue and Matterhorn Drive
combination. Right of ways are sufficient except for 52nd
Avenue and improvement is not expected on these for quite
awhfle as they are in fairly gaod condition now.
The xemaining possibilities are marginal due to either location or their
present state of travel. They are as follows:
.50 Mi. Benjamin Street -,Gardena Avenue to Rice Creek Road.
.12 Mi. Benjamin Street - Rice Creek Road to Mississippi Street.
.50-Mi. Main Street, 79th Avenue to 83rd Avenue.
.93 Mi. Alden Way, Mississippi Place, Charles Street combination.
41
PlaaninA Coa�ission Meetint� - October 10, 196_ 8 ��� P8$e �
RBCBIVE PARK3 � R�CREATION CQ►!lISSION MTNUTES• SEPTffi�ER 23, 1968:
11 -
IrDTIOTT by Jeasen, secoaded by Myhra, that the Planning Commiasion receive
the minutes af the Parke � Recreation Commisaion minutes of September 23, 1968.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carzied unanimously.
1�OTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Comnissioa receive
the miautea of the Plats � Subdivisions-Streets � Utilities Subcanmitt�e meet-
ing of October 3, 1968. Upoa a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
ua$nimously.
0_RDI�R OF �l�Gffi�1UA:
1.
Chaisman Erickson stated the meetiag would proceed aa listed.
ARING : APP1tOVE PBELII�IINARY PLANS P�OR PD ARF,A
. Coatinued to October 24, 1968.
Continued until next meeting.
2. Pt�BLIC I�ETING: VA�CATION S1VDY OF 7"'• AVENtTE_ (PRpJECT ST. 1969-3) :
; Mr. Clifford J. Thoe, 847 109th Lane, Coon Rapids: Mr. Thoe ia the
^' avner of the service atation on the northWest corner of 73rd Avenue and
�- Central Avenue. He said he could s�e the object to vacate 73� Aveaue in
order to run the street through on 73rd Avenue. He has a house on that
property cloee to where the intersectioa would be, aad there are large fuel
� taaks uaderground which would be under the right of way. The house faces
on Central Avenue and the taaks are in froat of it. His problem would be
dedicating 33 feet at the aouth end of the property.
Darrel Clark review the problem by saying that if the street were
vacated, all the right of way would be held by the City for utilitiea.
If they yacate 73� Avenue, perhaps the property awners would dedi�ate 33
feet in the south bouadary of their property for the extension of 73rd
Avenue. There are same prapertiea that Would not have public accesa if the
street wera vacated.
The public was it�formed that, if 73� Avenue were vacated, the property
owners could not build a permanent atructure aver the vacated laad, but
could use it for plant�ngs or parki,ng.
1lie ztming in this area is as follovs: Block 1, Lota 1 to 10 ase
C-2S; Lota 11 to 18, -- M-1: Block 2, Lota 1 to 16 are M-1, Lots 17 to 18,
C�1.
Mr. Carl Sorenson, 4615 University Av�nue p.E.: He �aid aa imiproved
street on the •outh aid� of his property would be an advantage, If 73�
Avenue Nese vacated, he Wonder�d if a road could be put on the aorth eide
of Block 1.
\
42
^ Darrel Clark explained that Council asked if it would bs fesai.ble to
trade property. Because of the building of the Onaa plant and future iadua-
trial �panaion, 73rd Aveaue was designated to ba a State Aid soad and it
was necessary for accese to Highway �65. If 73� ia vacated, lulf of the
right of way would go to the owaero on the north oide of the atr�at aad ths
other half to the o�wners on the soutii.
/'�
3.
4.
^
Chais�oan Erickson etated this was a fairly aizable probl�at aad could be
sent down to the Subcom�nittee for further atudq and call th� public back.
Aa attempt should be made to get more of the p�ople to the maetia�.
Mr. Jensen, chairman of the Plata 6 Subdivisiona-Street� 6 Otilitiea
Subco�ittee, eaid the public meeting would probably be in ths �iddle of
November.
M�TION by Myhra, seconded by �easea, that the Plaaning Co�issioa sead
daw�n to the Plats � Subdiviaions-Streets 6 Utilities Subcamittee the watter
of the vacation stuciy of 73� Avenue (St. 1969-3) with the ia8tructioms that
the Subco�nittee, in their deliberatioa, meet vith the o�mers of the prop�rty.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motioa carri4d unanimousl�. '
It waa explained to the property owners preeent that thia atudy Nould
go to the Subcaa�ittee aad in about a mvath or manth aad a half, they
could expect to hear by mail for the informal diacussioa. The decisioa, if
the Subco�ittee malces oae, will cama back to the P1a�aing Co�ia�ion and
thm to the Council.
�i�IUBD LOT SPLIT RI�QOEST: L.S. #68-13. OAVILLE �: Lot 30, Brook-
virw Addition.
Darrel Clark said he wao advised by the City Attornay to s�ad t6e
requert back to ?�Ir. Ratley asking him to get his wife'• sigaature before
the Plarmiag Co�ission can continua.the request. This Was dane, but w
have not haard from him.
1�TION by J�ueen, secandad by Myhra, to table the Lot Split E�quaat,
L.S. #68-13, Orvilla Aatley, of Lot 30� Brookvie�w Additioa. Opoa a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion cttrried unanimoiiely.
LOT SPLIT RBQUEST: L.S. #68-16, R(�TsERT WILSQd; Lot 4, Block 1, �lilsan
Addition. Split into two 50'9" lota. �
Chaisman Erickson 8aid it appeared the Board of Appeala and Couacil
hs� caacurred With the xeque�t. The Plaaning Co�ia�ion, about a year ago,
had recomorgaded rezoning this lot to it-3 with no waiver of ths laad area.
Mra. Robert �lilson aaid they wanted to build a fourplex, but th� lot pu •
only large enough for a triplex. She added th�re is a ti�r factor b�cauaa
th�y waat to build before �!_t ge�� too cold otherwisa they might not b� abla
to ssll if too late in the seaeon.
It wa� notad that the lot sizes
Colu�bia Hsights are an 40 foot lota.
are combintd to maka a atandard lot.
ia this ar�a
ue miao�l in !'ridla� �td th� iou�s� ia
Sooa of ths naller lot� ia l�tidle�
��� . ' 4��r �. • � .:,•� ` .:/ � �l ` ''l
.,sr, �•ii•. � . . a . •.. � � � ;...
.. --. .M . . . �. ~ . : . . _..Fw_. . . :. . . . � . r....u__ t 0 ,'d a�3`� jI ':�
� �� �, . � �-----� ----------�� � - . . .t.. f � i�:'.�; . +,'• .1:� .:� . �
. . . . � . . ��,s� - . a ..; .
..a_ . . . _ . � . . , ,�M./touGGLn.n./�.(r�o o.� . _ �. . . . , w' ..5•': /.s -.
2 ...� ,i.,�" �
... . . . . �� � . . . � . . � . .. . . .u.. Z � Y..'.�.:�`. . • ..
. +_ ii - � j, �t. � .�. • �� ` �' -
. . 'c►
— r,
� . . ��' � . � . . . - ---'---`--r--- --- ----'.. . ,.- - -' ------ � _ .. . _ - - �-.._ . _. . �
. - -_ _ ._ ,� /6 TH ,:
.- ,
i lL • � , �� � .
� M _::� ;�� � ^�Oj
. . . . �J� ..if
�1 E:�ti:. -
. . . ^ . .�. • .. -o f.LJH ' . !I .l�Y• ••• s�
• M i�Y0.1.• fl±� `• „a i��.• � J�- Z 1
. •` � :�_. j �-` N,•� � ��,,:5 �;
�; � �; " o�� .�1 g •. -
�: � � - ,' --. '• /� ! "�� � . � :` `� - •
. cp -�_� • - „<.,;.
i : � ---.-_— - — _ — ----, —../ -- ------- Z� L . . 4 e > _ .
i « _ • a; ,.r , r1 ,`Z :� '�..'�,.
� 0_ . ' . ,6 `` s��,�=, � � .
Z � �:e:e� _ , . �s=, � �`(' , '; "" F-. _ .0 �,� 5 .
r w is '�'� � r�; h, c ,�:
� Q I . � ! 4
w �y, L
` — � _ � .
' _. ....'"" � �"...'. _. _._ _iY_ _ ..,y." '_' -1t:/., __, _ . . . .. .'_"_'_ /' _. I'i-'��-� . J��s. �'!9)lf
!e
� . � �� �� /✓SIP� I / ._._ _..__.____ �v � � . .
= I �`� C�i/SE � (IeJj ��i (lv91 .
' C9: � r,e.,,.,�.., i— I" � 3 "'
�
_� ---------- _ � ' � (� Q
� ; �10�
• .r y-� �:�NfI(NOCsad ,�.i � AUD'� O„'J�
� � � (�Jlti . , . .
Y � MO �ia/ � � •
Z ° ' �,� � l'-- _
�I �� ~ � � . Noei�i�1! iL,,Yel,r�o�iR.�' ..� �`
� � �� � . . � . . � .
r
. � ! e . . . . . , � .1/ri�iie%Y..Yi'9x�� �lfids/Lr. fs4 �
� . F"� i M � , � � . � "� �. I �
� . .,-. � _ _ -.-:.- . �-. ._��..:U•� ,__.__.. -._.' :iT• � ' � . .� .. . JlJ � -
� � ' �� . . .� .�I , � irt.f��C.J�O�.Jt�i''e-M flfttY�
H I ' l� i t. .N /t•
I ��, :
. �
�-�- I � �' ¢/ •� ; 31 .
N I .�s/eif+Bi:a.i � r,.y�) j^�,qi� �_k( �,1i pPy'�`*.�_
(I?PO� � . wl ., . �Of}i✓i • ��'./ J���iV��.� y I V �'.Ji�/ �V ' S� .:
. � JA.I (/.:l.i � .. � J14�Y. .
M� � 3i1,.Y �� � i \ :
� . � ,� � I � � I � I Xxf�' ��l Z »
I �� �� ��
i +r
. � .�::.. ,,,,,, ..:1�_ r,. � :��... �� ; � «an ,/--j; ; ,f ,� ,>
----= ------- r�ts: _. �w � '4�L�� �JU �.9 �; 2 3 � 4 � S
1 c�'••w � � � / � .� � f,!
-.� Sb�/Jen ( �aiei�+ A.'..i�entw+ .
, �
. � � � i� r ui - . :
r " o . . .. . . . '�' • Ya 1 .l '� i � y Athif r .
� e � ( • �. � f � ( _ . . �6 � i (itr� � •�+*"1 =
'�` . ,/ � ♦ i ` ' � ��114°� � k(�'� �..="y
9��� z 3 a s 6 7 d r i y/wl ia; ia? ;,�� �sa i� � i9 ° ' �-�- _... lE�,..,._"w,
� A. � . i:'__.r�r = ��... /i.r
`; t 1 �` � SFv!/�.k �. o.G is
I \ � �e �,l� Ir �'j �o p� � z7i9 � leOss�, �musu�. � �y.s _-
� , . _ .. _ ". �, 0. , . � Le�r�� Por/ /� ,. _
,�; :� �: rs ii2 av�. rv.E. C��_ �., ; N•loJ �;s�m'` :,�,_
, � { .r. _ . _ _ . . Z�,, ,a � ,��,� , r
�`, I� _ �;;► i � „° w.r,��.•.
v � , , � Nson1 �""'' -
/fO �s './ Z`: 3 ¢ 5 6• y� B�' 9 /c // /Z /�� i4� /s /6 /1 $ �6� /8 C�oo� � � I�O ��/KAI.�'•.
. � \ I�F � 7) G - JNid��o-:
C e ' .� � � ' ` � f�l�:�
- - ��. G.--' ' '-'-""'-" "l.'-"" R e ° .. .. .. .. . . . . . . ' - ' • . p S . - - ..
;� � - ,ju, �Nr�R ~-eoat�-r-�--��nz�-Aio- �:
( s�-c. iz
• � ��
S�Y � �'� S� � : Y �3 e_ a-�i v ri %3 j�- � 'V � S � V �G k - u � -
u
� `3
� Pr�.�� e� S� ���9- � _
Y:`Yr�..�M �.�..:_- .w-:��- �.����.��.�....�__�`_�.�.�.� . _ . .
' —1: ' . ����..-.�._ �".�....��� ... _,�r..-.� �.�..�......+�-r.����w..
_.. . �-�.�.��,��-�.s..-.... -... .w� _
�..--.._� . .. . . . -. . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . . . ��.. .�.�.... •_. __�_.. . . . '- . - -.�..-..
. . .... . -� � . � . � _ . . ... . . . .
��.. .
���
�.. �
" ' . ... .. __ ..
. . - .. .. . ._. ... _.. .. .. ..
F ' . . . . - _ .. ... �. . . . . .. . �
•
/"1
REGULA.R COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 9
COI�SZDSRATION OF AN ORDINANCE REGUI.ATING THE EXCAVATING OF STREE'rS�
AVENU&S OR ALLEYS; REQUIRING A Pr3tMIT THEREFOR AND PAYMENT OF A
FEE; AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF ITS PROViSIONS:
44
Councilman Hatris asked if this had been revieiwed by the Adminis-
ration and legal staff. Z'he City Attorney said that he had looked
it over, and is not sure whom it is aimed at, as all the utility
companies and plumbers are excluded. If anyone were to want to
do any excavating, they would have to poat a$100,000 bond and pro-
vide insurance of $100,000 for one person and $300,000 for any one
accident and property damage. He said that it would seem that it
must be aimed at private property awners doing their awn excavating.
The City Engineer said that this is no problem. He said that the
Minneapolis Gas Company has been wanting to get this passed as
they do not want anyone to dig up the streets. Councilman Harris
point� out that if a$100,000 performance bond is required, it would
be cheaper to pay the fine. The City Attorney said that he did not
understand who is causing the problem. He said that he did not
knvw if uaauthorized people were digging in the streets nvw. He
wondered haw this would affect the home contractors. Councilman
Samuelson said that this would place a burden on the setiver and
� water cont=actors. Iie said that there is seldom a reason to break
up a street. �3'he City Attorney pointed out that plumbers are
exempted. Councilman Samuelson said that he felt that the utility
companies ahould not be exempted, as they are the ones that do the
excavating.
Mr. Charles Cawan of the Minneapolis Gas Company, said that he is
acting as laison man between the various municipalities and the
Gas Company. He said that this Ordinance was drawn up by Engin-
eers for the League of Municipalities, and it took about 1� years
to formulate the finished Ordinance. He said that a great number
of n�unicipalities have already adopted this Ordinance. He ex-
plained that by having a uniform excavating Ordinance it would be
similar to•the Uniform�Building Code used everywhere. He pointed
out that all the work ntust be done to the satisfaction of the
8nginear. He said another advantage would be 24 hour notice be-
fore any interuption in service and also that the compaction is
spelled out in detail. Councilman Samuel�on said that he still
felt that the utility companies should be included and be required
to get a permit. Mr. Cawan said that the Gas Company tries very
hard to make good patches and to auger under driveways, and he is
asking only that everyone else also conform to their standards.
� Mayor Kizkham com�aented that he could see the benefits of having
a waif��a , exiCg�vating Ordinance, but that he would like to ]zave this
btought b�acek ,�t. a later date to g ive the Counc il more t ime for
thought on ti�is. Mr. Co�wan said that this nrdinance is for the
o �v'
�
� .
SUBJECT T0 REVISIQNS
u�cb.i��aW±L,� �v�+.
4
�5
�����I�;'�CF i2�GiJ�A%��"r '�I-� E;�CCyb'ATII�G 0�' S��.EE�'�� .�'�I�ii�� GR %i,�:!EYS.
R�QUI�IAiG � �ER�"�i�T '��I�I�:F(�% �'�'�J� �s�Yk�xx.��3'l.' 0�' h a';��;, �'� �'R�S1'.RIBING
PENI�,LTT�S ��R VYOI,,�'�I0N5 OF I15 PROVISI4NS '�"'
Section l. Short Tztl�.
This ordinance $hall be known and may b� cited a� the "Street Excav�,tien
Ordinance of the CYty of Fridley".
Section 2.. Definitions. .
For the purpose� of this Om�inance, th� �ollo�aia�g t�x�na, pha�����, �a�sds ��d
the3r dex�iv�tioras �hall h�we th� msaning �:iven hem�in. 6Jhhen �a�� � zZ��a?�a.��-�nt with
the caHt��t 9����s �as�ri in th� p�sent t�r�s� .i�ac�.r��ie �h� f��g� �����i� �� the plurs�
aumbex� inclu�e the singular nu�ber, and words :.n the sis��ul�� n��.��� i.�clude the '
. plural nuz�er. Tta;; �a�rk „si:al:l" is aiway� man�ato�ry and raot a��ly diz�:ctory.
(a) "Applicant" is any person making writien application to the Citp
Engineer for an excavation permit hereunder.
.. (bi "City" is the City of Fridleye .
^
(c) "Ci�y Council" or "Council" is the City Council of the�City of
Fricjley.
(d). "Engineer" is the C3ty Engineer of the City of Fridley.
(el "Excavaticn work" is the excavation and other-wark pera�itted under an
excavation permit and required to be performed under this ar�in����
(f) "Permittee" is any pePSOn who has b�en ,��ed and .iaas .in full force
and effect an excavation p�zr�if issued h�reundc��..
Eg) "F�s+son" is any individual, firm, partnership, association or organization
of any kind. �
(h) "Street" is any street, highway, sidewalk, alley, ae�n�e, or other public
way�or grounds or public easements in the City of Fridley.
Section 3. Excavation Fermit.
•� � It sha11 be unlawful for any person to dig up, brrakt. e3ccavate, tunnel. drill.
bore, undermine or in any manner break up any.stree�.er.to�make or cause to be made
any excavat.ion in or under the surface of.any street, or to place, deposit or �eave
upan any street any earth or excavated material cbstructing or tending to interfere
with the free use of the street unless such gerson sbsli..first have obtained an
� excavation permit therefor from the Engineer as herein provided. .
� .
Ox�axazarsce No. . .-• .: ,,, -. _
_. ._
Excavating � �
� �
� .
Section 4. App.lication for Permit-
No excava�Cion permit shall be issued unless a written application for Lhe
issuar�ce of an excavation permit, an forms provided.ror that purpose, is submicLe�
"� to the Engineer, The written applicarion shall state the name and address �r t;:.
applicant, the nature, location and purFos� �f the excavati�n, the date `�f c.c.m.�r�en��-
ment and date of completicn of the exc:avat�on, and other data as may be rea��nalsly
be required by the Engineer. If required by rhe Engineer, �he application sha�1 _
be accompanied by plans showing th� extent �f *_he proposed excavation wark,_th� -
dimensions and elevations of both the existing �round prior to said excavatio:, and
af rhe prop�sed excavated surtaces, the iccation of the excavation wor;c� and �uch
other information as may be prescribed by rhe Engine�r.
Sec*_ion 5. Permir Fee.
Upon approval of the application for the excavation permit by th� Engin�er,
the applicant shall pay a fee of $ c;c to the-Engineer *o cove� reasonabl e1st;
for the issuance �f s�"_Q e�czva��..:.i �,���,ait o
Section 6. Excavat.ion;Placard.
The engineer shall provide each permittee,'at the time the p�g�it is issu�ed,
^ a suitable placard which shall state the permittee!s name, the permit number and
the date of expiration. It shall be the duty of any perzaittee hereunder to keep
the placard.posted in a conspicuous place at the site of the excavation wo�k. It
shall be un.lawful for any person to exhibit such plac�rd at or about any excaeation
not covered by such permit or to misrepresent the permit number or the date of
expiration.
Section 7. Surety Bond.
Before an excavation permit is fssued r.he applicant shall deposit with the
City Clerk a surety bond in the amount of $/���� �,�� in favor of the City.
The required surety bond must be:
ta) -With good and sufficient surety by a surety company authorized
ta do business in the State of Minnesata.
(b) Satisfactory to the City Attorney in form and substanceo
(c) Conditioned that�the applicant wi?1 faithfully comply with ali the
terms and conditions of this Ordinance; all rules; regulations and require-
- ments pursuant_thereto_and as required by -the Engineer and all reasonabl.e _
requirements of the Engineer.
(d) Canditioned that the applicant will secux^e and hold the City
and its officers harmless against any and all claims, judgements, or other cas*.�
ar�sing from the excavation permit or for which the City, the City Council or
�'1 any City officer may be made Iiable by r�'��+� of any acciden� or injury to -
persons or properry through the fault o" tne permittee.
Recovery on such surety bond for any injury or accident shall not exhaust the bend
but it shall in its entirety cover any or all future accidents or injuries 3uring
the excavation work for which it is given.
/'1
I
Ordinan^� No. •
Excavating
��
In �he even? cf �z�y suit �r cl��m ag•�ins* the City by r�ea��n �_= the
negligence �r defa�l,*. `�f the permictee , up �n the C�ty, givi�.g wrix *e •, r..;? i�s
to the peFmit_#e�= �f �uch su�* ::r cla:.m, any f�inal �udg�ne:,*.� against Lhe �ity
requireing iT *..� pay f�r s��;:h damage shai;. be _�nc�.us�ie �,p;,n the permirtee aad h�.�
�urety.
An annual bond may 1�� given under this pr•ovision which sha�.l t�emain in force
for ane year condi*ion�3 �s ab�ve, in tl-iE 3tIlO11I1� S�eLlf�ed herein 3nd in cthe: :e-
spec*s as �pecif�ed h�:-rr�n Dut appii.abi� .�� *_o all excavat�.or. work �n �treeTs by
the permittee durir.g the term of �ne yE3: trom said date.
Section 8. Exemption from Ssre�y B�nd-
`The s�irety bond pr�vi:ions of this �rdinance �hall �ot apply to a du3.y iicenoed
and bonded plumber �r t� �ny publi� stility rermi?Led to �erare within the C�ty
limits, by franchi�e or ::�herais�, for the �urp�sE of supplyir.g gas, electrir_, or
telephone service or for any exca�ration *.rhi.ch is made tr��-:•� :, r:ontract awarc:�d by
the City or made �y tne Cir_y,
Section 9. Engineer, <
.
All wark done pursuant t� an excav�Ta.on permit issued under the provisions of
f,,, this Qi�dinance shall be performed under the direction and to the sati�faction of
the Engineer cr h:.� duiy author.iz�d agento �
The Engineer s6a12 prepare such regu�ations with respect to excavations within
any street, a*�d shall modify them with respect to par•ticular work, as the Engineer
shall deem necessary or advi�able to protec* che public from injury, to prevent
damage to pubiic or private p��operty, and r.o minimize interference with the public
use of the street�.
Regulations promulgated by the Engineer sha11 be appr•::ved by the Coun�il after
notice of hearing and hearing and a copy ot said regulations �hali be given to each
psrmittee upon issuan�e of the street ex�avation permit;
Regulations promuigated by the Engineer m3y include:
(a) Requirement tha: all p�.iblic uiilities be notified by the permittee �f
permittee's intent to make a street sxcavation giving notice of t.ime, p�ace
and purpose of such Excavazion.
(b) Requir�ement �hat the permi*tee sr:a�l have the du*y :.* determining
� the l�cation and depth of all existing undergrc,und facii�tiese
�c) Manner� aad m�Thod of backfilting streer, Excava*i.;r, and pr:.:�3ure to
be fallowed in c�mpa�cing ba�kfillea materlal. �
(d) Specifi�aticn.: as to mater•iai to be used in backfilling street
�+'� excavation . -
(e) Manner and method ::f mak:.ng stre�t excavation inc��ding pr�cedures to
safeguard and protee* adj�ining and ad;�cent properLy and existing undergruund
and ab�ve ground fac�.li*_igs.
(f) RPquirements for re_t�ra*icz ,:f �treet surf�aces-
.
�
�
^
Qrdinan�e N�.
Excavating
Special grovisior.s �hall be ma�e t�::r ��mplifying p_��cedures .z;.a supervis:c-.
in respect` to sx��s�3��r.s b�r frar.�.h�.ed 4�iliTics-
48
,_ Secrion i�J . Emergen: y A �*. i�n .
In the �ve,�r :,f day emergency rn whlc:h a muir�, ��n��i-, �r sti�:.ty facil�*;y
in �r under ar,y ; treet breaks , burs *. s, �r :�ther��ri �e i� :r. �uch condit ��n as to
immediately.end�nger the property, life, heaith �r :�afety of any individual, the
person own:.ng or controlling su�:.h maS:n, aandui*., �r utiliry "fa�cility� withaut first
applying fos �nd obtai.,ing an excav_tivn permiz nereunder, sha:.l immediately take
proper emerger.��y measures *..o �sre or remedy the dangerous condi*_ions for the pi^�;-
tection of prc�perty, life, hea�th ar.d ;.afety of individuai� . However, such person
owniing or contro2ling such facii�ry 3haii appiy rar an ex�avau�n permit not later
than fhe end of tha next 5ucc.:eed�ng day 3�iring w:�ich the Ezgi:,eer's �ffice is open'
for bu�iness, and shall not pr�ceed with permanenc repa�r� without first obta�r,ing
an excavation p�-rmit hereunder.
Section ll, Non-completion c,r Ab�*±��nment.
Work shall progress in an expeditious manner until comgletion in order to
avoid unnecessary inconvenience to the general public. In the event that the work
shall not be performed in accordar.�e with the apglicabie regulaticns of the Engineer
or in accordance with the pr�visions of this Ordinance, or shall cease or be aban-
doned without 3ue cause, the City may, after six hours' notice in writing to the
holder of said permit af intent to do so, �orre�t said�work or fill the excavation,
and rep3ir the street, and in any such even� the entire ccst to the City of such
work shall be a liabili.ty of and shall be paid 'ny the persan to wh�m the permit
was issued and his surety.
Section 12, Insurance.
-A permittee, prior to �he ccmmencemenr, of excavation work hereunder, shall
furnish the Engineer satisfactcr�y eviden�e in writing that the Fermittee has in
force and will maintain in force during the perf�ormance of the excavation work and
the period af the excavation permit public: liability insurance of not less than
S1D0•� cc�, for any one person and S 3QL,� �� �o.r any one accident and
property damage insurance of not les� than S � p.� duly issued by an insur-
ance company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota and �n which
policy the City is name�i as a co-insured.
Sec*.ion I3, Indemnification.
The permittee shall indemnify, keep and hold the City free and harmless
from liability on account �f ir.jury or damage to pers�ns �r property arising • -
or growing out of the permittee's negligence in making any street excavation.
In the event that suir shaii be brcught agair.s� the City,.eithzr independently
or jointly with *_he permi�tee on account Lhereof, *_he pe:mittee, upac notice
to it by the City,.sha L 3efend the City in any s:iit at the cost of the permittee,
and in the event of a rinal judgmen* being obtained against the City, either
independ�ntly or jointly wi*r the pErmittee, thE permitt�e �hall pay such -
judgment�with all oosts and hold the City harmless *.nere.froms
,y'1
Ordina�ce No.
Excavating
Section 14. Exemption fram £ee P�yment and Insurance Pr��vi��i�ns.
The provisions of this Ordinance rec�uiring payment of a permit fee and
evidence of public liabil.ity and pr�operty damage insura ce shall not be applica-
cow r��re �
ble to any excavation work carried on by the City�or its �mgloye�:s, and
utilitfes operating gas, electric or tele�hone facilities w�7hin the City.
Seetion•15. Refusal of Permits.
If any person shall fail, refuse �r neg.lect to comply with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any'rules or regui.ations of the Engineer, or any
1°easonable orders or directons of the Engineer in reference thereto, the
Engineer may refuse to issue further permits to such person unti.l such
conditions or orders are complied withe
Section l6. Penalty.
_ �
Any person violating any of the provisions of thi� Ordinance shall be �.
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a.fine of not' more than One
Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or by imprisonment for not more than ainety (90)
days for each offense,
Section 17. Effective Date.
^� �
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its
passage and publication. �
�
PASSED BY THE CITY COUN�IL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1968.
MAYOR Jack .0. Kirkhar.
ATTEST; '
CITY CLEF,K. Marvin C. Brunsell
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publish ,...,..
� �