Loading...
PL 02/20/1974 - 31167� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMIS5ION MEETING FEBRUARY 20, 1974 CALL TO ORDER: PAGE 1 Chairman Fitzpatrick called the meeting to order at 8:50 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Fitzpatrick, None Darrel Clark, Drigans, Blair, Lindblad, Harris Community Development Administrator APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 6, 1974 MOTION by Harris, seconded b� Lindblad, that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the meeting of February 6, 1974 as written. Upon a voice vote, a31 voting a�e, the motion carried unanimously. � RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 28, 1974 MOTION by B1air, seconded by � Commission receive fhe minutes of . meeting of January 28, 1974. Upon motion carried unanimously. � Drigans, that ihe Planning the Parks & Recreation Commission a voice vote, a1I voting aye, the RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 31, 197� � MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by B1air, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control 5ubcommiftee meeting of January 31, I974. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the rr�otion carried unaniraously. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Lindblad what was �eant by "ear�h colors" on the Al Zeis buildings? Mr. Lindblad said it referred to the different types of bloek that would be painted to blend in with the brick, to break up the blank look of the development. RECETVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTE5: FEBRUARY 7, 1974 MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Building Standard�-Design Control Subcommittee meeting of February 7, 1974. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried ur.animous.Zy. RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: FEBRUARY 7, 1974 MOTION by Drigans,�seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission receive the minvtes of t1�e Board of Ap�neals meeting of Fehruary 7, 1974. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � � - Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page�2 r'°"',, RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: FEBRUARY 13, 1974 MOTION by Harris, seconded by Drigans, fhat the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee meeting of February I3, 1974. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. l. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REOUEST, ZOA #74-01, HENNING NELSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: To rezone Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, Block 2, Riverwood Manor, from R-1 (single family dwelling areas) to R-3 (general multiple family dwelling areas) to allow construction o� a 24 unit apartment complex generally Iocated Sou�h of 71st Way N.E. and West of East River Road. Public Hearing closed. MOTION by Harris, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission receive the Zetter from Independent School District 14, dated Februar� 20, 1974. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the mo'tion 'carried unanimously. Chairman Fitzpatrick said he wanted the contents of this letter included in the minutes and he read, as follows: "The letter is.address to Edward Fitzpatrick, Chairman of the Planning Commission: At the regular meeting of the Board of Education, District 14, held on February 19, 1974, the following resolution was introduced by Gardon Sangster: "Whereas the Fridley Planning Commission has received a request to rezone Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, Block 2, Riverwood Manor, from R-1 (single family dwelling areas) to R-3 (general mul�iple family dwelling areas), Whereas the described property is located across 71st Way Northeast from the entrance fo the Riverwood Elementarg School, Anc� whereas the increased housing density and attendant traffic could create a sa�fety hazard'at the school entrance, Therefore, be it resolved tha� the Board of Education of Fridley Independent School District No. 14 requests that the described property be retained with the current R-1 zoning classification." The above resolution was seconded by Mary Schreiner, ancl the following members vc�ted in favor of the resolution: Raymond Mondloh, Gordon Sangster, Mary Schreiner, Wallace Hlavac and John Meyer. Those voting no: none. Robert Pierce �abstained. Because District 14 is an adjacent property holder to.the land in question, we would like to �� �express our position on the matter. Thank you. �, Mr. Fitzp�trick saicl the letter was signed by Mary Schreiner, Clerk of the Board of Education." Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 3 � Mr. Clark said the petitioner, Mr. Reinertson, had lef t a message with the staff saying that he was too ill to attend the meeting this evening and asked to have the consideration of the rezoning request�COntinued until March 6th. MOTION by B1air, seconded by Drigans, that the PZanning . Commission continue rezoning request, ZOA #74-OI, by Henning Nelson Construction Company, to rezone Lots 13, I4, I5, 16, Block 2, Riverwood Manor, from R-1 (single family dwelling areas) to R-3 (general multiple famiZy dwelling areas) to a11ow construction of a 24 unit apartment• complex generally located South of 71st Way N.E. and West of East River Road, unti2 March 6, 1974 at the petitioner's reques�. Upon a voice vote, a1I voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #�4-0�, RICE CREEK ESTATES, BY GOODCO, INC., AND PINE TREE BUILDERS: Bring a replat of Part of Lots 9 and 10, Auditor°s Subdivision No. 22, located between Rice Creek Road and 61st Avenue N.E., and West of Benjamin Street N.E. Mr. Roland Goodroad was present to represent the petitioner. MOTION b� Drig�ans, seconded�by Har,ris, fhat ihe Planning Commission waive the reading of the Public Hearing notice on P.S. #74-01, Rice � Creek Estates, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree builders. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Clark said the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee had been given a petition by the neighbors stating that they were in opposition to this preliminary plat, but most of the opposition seemed to be against the extension of 61st Avenue N.E. rather than the entire plat. � Chairman Fitzpatrick said they would have to receive the petition as presented. MOTION by Blair, seconded by Lindblad, that the Plan•ning Commission receive petition #3-1974, in opposition to proposed preliminar� plat, P.S. #74-D1, Rice Creek Estates, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree Builders, being a replat of Lot 10, Auditor`s.Subdivision #22, except the.North 260 feet thereof; and Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision #22, except the North 260 feet of fhe West 132 feet, lying in the South Ha1f of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally Iocated between Rice Creek Road and 61st Avenue N.E. and West of Benjamir, Street N.E. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � � Mrs. Gloria Arel, 1521 Ferndale Avenue N.E., said a different plat was presented at the Plats & Subdivisions meeting this evening, r,• 'and their opposition was to the extension of 61�t Avenue N.E. � Mr. Clark said the first plan presented by the petitioner is the plan that you have in your agenda. According to the comprehensive park plan, there is a need for a park in this area,.so the City staff. drew up a modification of this plan, where the City would try to get some where between two to three acres for a neighborhood park on this plat. �1 � Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 4 One of the big objections to this first.plat was that it did not render the Theilmann property to their satisfaction. The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee told the petitioner to work with the City staff and.the Theilmann's to develop a plat that was satisfactory to both. The petitioner brought in a new plan tonight that does not include the Theilmann property. Chairman Fitzpatrick said all the Theilmann property wasn't included in the first plat. Mr. Clark said it did not include the Theilmann homestead property on which their home is loca-ted. Mr. Clark said the preliminary plat presented to the PYat.s & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee before this meeting still had some opposition also. The people living on Ferndale did not want 61st Avenue N.E. extended any further West than the existing right of way and the petitioner is to negotiate with the property owners for the right of way or work with the Parks & Recreation Commission if this cul-de-sac has to be entirely on this plat. This would make lots 20 and 21 unbuildable and the balance of these lots could possibly be added on to the proposed park land. The petitioner was asked to dedicate 1.8 acres for park land and the City will have to negotiate for the additional acre or so that will be needed,for a neighborhood park. The petitioner was asked for a 10 foot sidewalk easement along Lot 15 for a walkway to the park. Any three to one slope on the plat would be sodded within one year of development to prevent erosion. Another stipulation was to have all the utilities underground. Mr. Clark continued, that there was a triangle needed for Briardale Road and the petitioner should negotia�te with the Theilmann's or ask the City to negotiate for it or else start condemnation proceed- ings for it. The road, Woodside Court would be temporarily dead- ended at the West and East sides where it meets the Theilmann property. O.ther stipulations were that the petitioner should plant one tree on each lot and the drainage plan be presented to the City Engineer for approval. Mr. Clark said the street on the West side of the plat will line up with the road when Mr.O'Bannon develops his property. Mr. Drigans asked if Mr. O'Bannon has platted his property next to this plat yet. Mr. Clark said only a portion of it has been platted. �1 � Mr. Clark said this plat was going to the Parl�s& Recreation Commission at a later date. Paul Brown has said he would like room for a ball diamond, a multi-purpose court to be used for basket ball and volley ball, a skating rink and possibly hockey,and an apparatus section. If the petitioner runs the cul-de-sac on parts of Lots 21 and Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 5 � 22, the Parks Commissaon might pick up the balance of these two lots and leave them in their natural state. This area could be used for a hill for sliding in the winter time. Mr. Driagans asked to have the cul-de-sac problem explained again. Mr. Clark said th�t on the original proposal, 61st Avenue was extended the width of the plat. The:terrain is such that this really wasn't feasible. On the second plat, the petitioner is only extending 61st Avenue as far. as the right of way has already been dedicated, ending with a cul-de-sac at this point. This cul-de-sac would extend into. lots on the South side of this plat where right of way has not been gran�ed. The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee asked the petitioner to negotiate for this right of way. Two of the three people who would be involved in granting this right of way were at the earlier meeting and stated that they did not want to give this right of way. The other party was not present; but according to those presen�, he would be willing to give the right of way. If the right of way cannot be obtained in line with 61st Avenue, the petitioner might have to put the cul-de-sac all on his property which would make Lots 21 and 22 unbuildavle, so it was suggested that the portion of these lots that are remaining, be added to the park land�to be purchased by the City. Mr. Lindblad said that Lots 22 and 23 were quite long lots. Mr. Clark said this was because there was quite a grade change on these �'�i lots and they had �o be that long so the� would have about 60 feet to build on. . � � � Mr. Blair asked the status of the triangle of Theilmann property that comes down into Briardale Roado Mr. Clark said the Theilmann's were asked to dedicate the right of way for this road because this plat will help them.develop their land when they are in a positian to plat. Mr. Clark said it would be better for the grading and utility work if Theilmann's were to plat at the same time as the balance of this property is being platted. Mr. Goodroad said they have made every effort to work with every one concerned with the proposed plat. This is the best plan they could come up with that pleased the most people. Mr. Drigans asked Mr. Clark if all these lots wi.11 be buildable. Mr. Clark said there hasn't been enough time to check the lots against the elevations on the plat, but he would think about five lots would be problem lots, where there will have to be a lot of grading, retain- ing walis and some terracing. These would be Lots 26, 27, 28, and 29 for sure, where there is a 30 faot fall from the b•ack lot line to the front lot line. They plan to use tuck under garages on these lots and will use about 4 feet for the driveway for the garage and about 6 feet on the grade of the house, leavi�g a difference in grade of 20 feet. This would be about a three to one slope. The two long lots in �he Southwest corner of the plat have an area of about 70 feet they could build on, and with a 35 foot setback and a 25 foot house, they could build on these lo�ts. - - � �, � ,Planning Commiss'io� Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 6 Chairman Fitzpatrick asked about the lots facing South on 61.st Avenue. Mr. Clark said these lots are.higher in front than in back, and will be walkouts. The petitioner has already stated that he intends to ask for a 10 foot variance on the front setback so these houses could be closer to the street. The houses on the same street in the Briardale Plat are set back 30 feet, so it wouldn't be too bad to have this variance as long as all the houses have the same setback. Mr. Harris said the right of way for the cul-de,sac on 61s� Avenue is one of the hold-ups on the plat. Mr. Clark said the petitioner will have to negotiate for the right of way for this cul-de-sac or move the cul-de-�sac. Chairman Fitzpatrick said it would be hard to make a decision on this;plat until we know what the Parks& Recreation Commission decide on the park. Mr. Blair said there is already money budgeted for a park in this area. Chairman Fitzpatrick asked Mr. Harris if there was general agreement on this plat at the earlier Plats & Subdivisions meeting. Mr. Harris said this plat really didn't please anyone completely, but may be the bes� plat for this area.� There were problems with the different grades but one of the stipulations made at �his earlier meeting was that the grades be worked out with the City Engineering DePartmento Mr. Clark said it was difficult for the City or the petitioner to set grades until they have an approved preliminary plat to work with. Just looking at the topography map, it does look like it can work. Chairman Fitzpatrick said there were problems with the cul-de- sac, the park plan, the triangle and other problems on this plat that couldn't be resolved at this time and he wondered if the plat should be given preliminary approval: Mr. Harris said these problems will �have to.be solved before final agproval, so we could�ask to see the final plat before it is submitted to the City Council. Mr. �Cla��k said there is a sewer.and water project and thepetiti�onerwould like to have this plat added to He is also anxious to get some model homes built. in this area that project. Mr. Drigans_.said this was a sketch that was just drawn up today, and there were problems with this plat. We don't know if these will all be buildable sites, how many variances they will need, and if the problems can be worked out. Mr. Goadroad said this plat has been on the drawing board for some time, and it was only because of the requested changes that all the information wasn't ready at this time. Mr. Clark said they have prepared a topography:map,but at least three different plats have been drawn up in two weeks and it wasn't feasible to have this topography overlayed on each different proposale Nlr. Harris said he felt it was necessary •to approve this preliminary plat to give the petitioner some direction. We will never know what � ;� Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 7 the grades are or what the drainage problems will be, or what variances may be needed until.we approve something. Mr. Lindblad said the Parks & Recreation Commission are going to have to have something to look at if they are to make a determination on the park land. Mr. Utter said he agreed with has to have somewhere to start and plat before he can start working on Mr. Harris in that the petitioner he has to have acceptance of this the problems. Mr. Drigans said he realized that the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcommittee had recom�ended approval of this preliminary plat bu� as far as he was concerned there were too many unanswered questions. He said he could see giving concept approval. He said we do not have any correspondence from Mr. O'Bannon on how he feels this plat will fit in with his property. Chairman Fitzpatrick said the petitioner was not asking for concept approval. He said that although this was the most preliminary plat they had looked�at in a long time, this. was a request for prelim.= inary plat approval. Mr. Harris said the petitioner will be able to establish the street grades and lat grades after he has approval of this preliminary plat. Mr. Lindblaa said he didn't think anything could be accomplished by delaying the approval of this plat. He said we should either approve or deny the preliminary plat a� this meeting. MOTION by Harr�s, seconded hy Blair, that the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing on the request for consideraiion of a pre- liminary plat, P.S. #74-OZ, �ice Creek Estates, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree Builders. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimousl�. MOTION by Harris, seconded by Lindblad, that fhe Planning Commission recommend to CounciZ approve of P.5. #74-01, a preliminary p1at, Rice Creek Est�a���s, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree Builders, a replat of ' part of Lots 9 and 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, Iocated between . Rice Creek Road and 6lst Avenue Northeast and West of Benjamin 5treet, with the following stipulations: (1) Subject to obtaining street dedication from the Theilmann's for the ex�ension of Briardale Road. (Z) Subject to obtaining right of ,way for cul-de-sac on 61st Avenue or realiqnment of the cul-de-sac on petitioner's property. This may be negotiated at the time the discussion ,� ' takes place with the Parks & Recreation Commission. (3) (4) WaZkway be provided to park from Benjamin in the vacinity of the South Zine of Lot 15. Svbject to negotiation with the City for additional park 1and. Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 8 � (5) Provide underground utiZities. (6) One tree planted per 1ot, 2" minimum diameter. (7) Grades to be worked out with City Engineering Department. (8) Lots that have grade difficulties with a three to one slope after the grade is estabZished, be sodded within one �ear of completion. (9) Woodside �ourt be temporarily dead-ended on the East and West�side of the Theilmann property Iine. (ZO) AII lots must meet minimum lot size and have minimum front footage and depth. . � (11) Affer the grades have been established b� �he engineer's,. the pZat come back to the Planning Commission before Council approval. Upon a voice vo�e, Harris, Lindblad, B1air, and Fitzpatrick voting a�e, Drigans abstaining, the motion carried. 3. DESIGNATION OF 1.11 MILES OF STATE AID STREETS � Mr. Harris said �his was reviewed by the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcommittee at their meeting of February 13, 1974. They changed the priority list as given in the February 7th memo from Richard Sobiech. The priorities stayed the same e�cept that Main Street trom 83rd Avenue N.E, to 85th Avenue N.�, was inserted as number three instead of number one. The Subcommittee felt that they would rather wait a year on this street until the North Park area was settled. Mr. Clark said that with the mileage , that.would be allowed the following year, they would be able to designate this street at that. time. • Mr. Lindblad asked the advantages and disadvantages to having State Aid streets. Mr. Clark said a city is allowed to designate 200 of its street as State Aid streets. We collect construction money and maintenance money based on the mileage designated for State Aid. This year, the City received �185,000 in construction money. The disadvantages might be that they dictate how the road should be constructed. They must be 9 ton roads. The minimum width is 40 feet and they like to see � them 44 feet or wider. Having a State Aid road does disrupt some neighborhoods because people tend to drive faster on these wider streets, ,,—.�• �nd it has been said that we are building speedways. Mr. Clark said that on the list of priorities recommended by the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee that number 1 � Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 9 ��1 needs another mat and curb,(Main Street - Osborne Road to 79th Avenue), � number 2,(Commerce Lane - 73rd Avenue N.E. to Osborne Road) needs another mat, and number 3, (Main Street - 83rd Avenue N.E. to 85th Av,enue N.E.) needs everything. . Mr. Harris said that the City administration didn't feel we would get State Aid approval on priorities 4 and 5. Mr. Clark said that Benjamin Street from Rice Creek Road to Gardena Avenue, is a brand new street�.and we probably won't be spending any money on this stree� for 20 years. qn the fifth priority, Jackson Street - 73rd Avenue N.E. to Osborne Road, one of the conditions the 5tate put on this rou�e was that it be continued South from 73rd across Rice Creek to• Rice Creek Terrace. Mr. Drigans asked why we are designating five priorities when cnly two can be approved. Mr. Clark said that if the Sta�e doesn't accept the first two priorities, they would alternate priorities �o choose from. Mr. Drigans asked if there were other places in the City other than those on this prioritp list that would be better to designate. Mr. Clark�said many routes are suggested to the State, and they then tell the City where they would accept State Aid designation. MOTION by Blair, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council that the priority list for designatinq 1.11 miles ,,,..� of State Aid streets be as follows: (I) Main Street - Osborne Road to 79th Avenue (Os36�mi�es) (2) Commerce Lane - 73rd Avenue N.E. to Dsborne Road'(0.44 miles) (3) Main Street - 83rd Avenue N.E. to 85th Avenue N.E. (0.39 miles; (4) Benjamin Street - Rice Creek Road to Gardena Avenue (O.SZ mile� (5) Jackson Streef - 73rd Avenue N.E, to Osborne Road (0.50 miles) . � •, Upon a voice vote, a.Z1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 4. MEMO FRON! DARREL CLARK TO CITY ATTORNEY: FEBRUARY 8, 1974 Mr. Clark said this memo covered two items. The first was on the sign ordinance on billboards. He said he had talked to Mr. Herrick and he said he would answer this part of the memo after he has met • with the Planning Commission and the Board of Appeals. The second item on the memo was just to ask for clar�fication on recommending a Special Use instead of rezoning; and he said this was something we have done before on the North Suburban Hospital District rezoning request. Mr. Clark said you couldn't change the r-� rezoning request to different zoning, but as a Special Use Permit is � more restrictive, this is allowed. � Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 10 � Mr. Clark asked when the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals would like to have their meeting with Mr. Herrick. Mr. Drigans said the Board of Appeals was meeting on March 12th and the special meeting could be held after this meeting as long as the Board members would already be present. He said they usually met at 7:30 but they could meet at 7:00 this evening so the special meeting could be sure to start around 8:00 P.M. This was satisfactory to the other members of the Planning Commission. Mr. Lindblad asked if there was any advantage to the City in . allowing billboards. Mr. Clark said he thought it might have been the intention of the Planning Gommission and the Council when they adopted this sign ordinance that possibly they could eliminate some of these billboards in five years since the ordinance required Council action on billboards within five years of the original adoption, at least the ones that have serious problems. These would be the billboards that are too close to an intersection or in residential areas. � Mr.� Drigans asked Mr. Clark if he could prepare a map showing the location of the existing billboards and have photographs taken of each one. �-., Mr. Lindblad said he ��rould like to know how much tax revenue � the City receives_fram these billboards. Mr. Harris said if we knew where each one was located we would know what the problem was with each one and how bad the problem really is with these billboards. � Mr. Clark said he would have this information for the special meeting. 5. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FROM COON RAPIDS PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Clark said this Planned Unit Development is requested by Burlington Northern and will be located North of the North Park area � and across �rom Northtown. Mr. Fitzpatrick asked if anyone from the City would be attending this meeting. Mr. Clark said he could not attend, but he would contact Coon Rapids and get a copy of the proposal and a copy of the minutes of this meeting. 6. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: SPRING LAKE PARK �� • Chairman Fitzpatrick said this was a request for a 78 unit - _ apartment for the elderly and a 150 bed board and care facility for the retired, located at Osborne Road and Terrace which will be heard on February 28, 1974. Mr. Harris said he would be able� to attend this meetingo 0 r'� Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Pa e 11 g 7. COURT DECISION ON LOT SPLIT REQUEST: EDINA Mr. Fitzpatrick said this was included in our agenda just as information. He said he was surprised this decision hadn't been appealed and that the decision stood. He said he thought it was a very interesting case. Mr. Drigans said he agreed. Chairman Fitzpatrick said it gives the Planning Commission moral support. 8• PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: SPRING LAKE PARK Chairman Fitzpatrick said �this was a request for a Special Use Permit to allow construction and use of a Fotomat facility and miniature golf course at 83rd & University. � Mr. Clark said they must have an ordinance similar to ours, because this would require�a Special Use in Fridley also. Mr. Fitzpatrick said �this was going to be heard at the same time as the other request in Spring Lake Park so Mr. Harris can bring back information on this item also. 9. FEBRUARY 27, 1974 MEETING OF DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN MANKATO, MINNESOTA �_ Mr. Clark said that Mr. Jerrold Boardman was attending this meeting and he int�ended �to attend also, if possible. He said this � meeting �.ras to modify Section 23 on the�leasing program for public housing. Mr'. Clark said he was bringing it to the attention of the Planning Commission in case any of them were interested in a�ttending this meeting as same of the members have gone to these meetings in the past. 10. TREE ORDINANCE Mre Blair asked if this ordinance would be coming before the Planninr Commission. . Mr. Clark said that ordinarily it wouldn't unless the Council chooses to sent it to you. Chairman Fitzpatrick�.�djourned the meeting at 10:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ��. r'�° � ' �/ /�y ���/��",. � p � _� /J ' � //`�44"�C4(,.�= � �(.-��i� t�C orothy Ev nson, Secretary 0 I II - li /, � i � � • I:� , �.� �,_ , � � ��s_�.��7 l�c� —_.:/_ �.,,w� v� !�' yd G�, , � i ��r�___`i=.� F/I/ �� � �� t.