Loading...
PL 02/05/1975 - 7506i '�, CITY OF FRIDLEY nAGENDA � PLANNING COMMISSION. MEETING FEBRUARY 5, 1975 8:OQ P.M. CAkL TQ ORa�R: PAGES RQ�L, CALL: APPROVE PLANNING GOMMTSSION MINUTES:. JANUARY 22, 1975 1- 11 RECETVE THE JQINT MEETING OF CITIZ�i� BIK�WAY3 PLRNI�IHG COlNN�ISSION, 12 - 13 AND RARKS & R CREATiUN IIUUT�S: JANUARY 7, 1975 RECEIVE PARKS & REGREATION GOMMISSION . SElBCON1MIT�'EE NiII�U�TES � � 4- 17 JANUARY 20, i975 RECEIV� BUILDIPJG STRNEIA�QS-DESIGN CONTROL S�BCQM�IIT?"EE MINt�TES: 18 � 2f� ` � JANUARY 23, 1975 �ECEIVE BtIARa OF APPfALS SUBCOhlMITEE MIt�UTES: JAl�E1ARY 28, i975 2� - 25 l. CONTINUEQ: PUBLIC H€ARTNG: REQUEST FQR A SPECTAL USE PERMIT, SP �#74-17� BY GEORGE WAlQUIST: To permi� the constru:c�icrn of �a duildin� for rust-proo-Fing o� automobiles, etc., per EridTey� _ Ci`ty Code, Section 205.131, (A,,10}, in ar� M-1 zone (light in- dustrual areas) to be located on Lot 5, of pr�posed plat, P.S. #74-08, the same being 1271 Rice Creek R�ad N.E. Public Nearing open. No action needed. 2. CONTINUED: PUBL.IC HEARI�dG: CQNSIDERATTO� OF A RE�OI�ING �� 2C - 37 RE UEST, ZOA #74-05 BY RAO MANUFACTURIN� COMPA�Y: To rezone from C-2�, general shopping areas ta M-1 light industrial areasj, tots 3- 15, Lots 27 - 32, and parts of Lots 2 and 16, a11 in Block 9; vacated alleys in Block 9; and the East Half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to Block 9, all being in Lawell Addition ta Fridley ParK., the same being 2Q0 Mississippi Street N.E. Publie Nearing closed. � 3. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPtIT, L.S. #75-01, DEAN HARMO(V: Split off 38 - 39 the Easterly 8 feet o�Ff the North 1/3 of Lat 4, except the East 85 feet, except the West 25 feet, and exeept the North 30 feet for public utilities & street, Auditar's Subdivision I�o. 108, (ParEel 440} and add it to the Ea�t 85 feet of the North 1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor`s Subdivision No. 108, (Rarcel . 450}, the same being 1600 and 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. ADJOURNMEN7': � MONTHLY WORKSHOP MEEi'ING OF THE PLANNfiNG GOMMISSION WILL BE NELD AFTER THIS MEETING: REVIEW OF ZONING GODES C GITY OF FRIDLEY r'1 PLANNING CUMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1975 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Fitzpatrick called the meet'ing to order at 8;05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Fitzpatrick, Harris, Blair, Drigans, Langenfeld Members Absent: Lindblad Others Present: JerroTd Boardman, Planning Assistant Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator APPRQVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: DECEMBER 18, 1974 MOTION by Harris, seconded by BZ:air, that �he Planning Commiss�on minutes of Decerrtber 18, 1974 be approved as written. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMIT7EE MINUTES: DECEMBER 19, 1974 MOTION b�,Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Bui.Zding 5tandards-Design Control Subcommittee meeting of December I9, 1974. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. '^ RECEIVE PARKS & RECREAI'ION CONWIISSION SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: DECEMBER 23, 1974 MOTION by B1air, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Corranission Subcommittee meeting of December 23, 1974.. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANUARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 9, 1975 MOTION by Harris, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee meeting of January 9, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCDMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 14, 1y75 MOTION by Drigans, seconded by B1air, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee meeting of January 14, 1975. Upon a voice vote, aZl voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCUMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 15, 1975 MOTION by Harris, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the P1ats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee of January 15, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � 1. CONIINUED• PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #74-17, BY GEORGE WALQUIST: To permit the construction of a building for rust-proof�:ng of automobiles, etc., per Fridley City Code, Section 2(15.131, (A,10) in an M-1 zone (light industrial areas) to be located on proposed tot 5 of a proposed plat, P.S. n P)anning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Page 2__ #74-U8, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, the same being 1271 Rice Creek Road�N.E. Public Hearing open. Mr. Boardman said the petitioner had notified the staff that the developer of this praperty 1ived in Detroit, and would not be present for this meeting. He requested that this request be continued until such time as the developer would be available to answer questions regarding the operation of this business. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission continue the xequest for a Special Use Permit, SP #74-17, by George Walquist, to permit the con- struction of a building for rust proofing of automobiles, etc., per Fridley City Code, Section 205.131 (A,10) in an M-1 zone (light industrial areas) to be located on Lot 5, of a praposed p1at, P.S. #74-08, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, the same being 1271 Rice Creek Road N.E., until the petitioner can have the developer of this property appear before the P2anning Commission. Upon a voice vote, aI1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. PU�LIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING RE UEST, ZOA #74-05, BY RA� MANUFAC= TUHING CQMPANY: To rezone from C-2S general shopping areas to M-1 light�indus- _' trial areas), Lots 3-15, Lots 27-32, and part of Lots 2 and l6, all in Block 9; vacated aTleys in Block 9, and the East half of vacated Main Street, lying adjacent to Block y, all being in Lowell Addition to Fridley, Park, the same being 2U0 Mississippi Street N.E. . Chairman Fitzpatrick read the Public Hearing notice, for the rezoning request, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Eompany. ,^ Mr. Robert A. Olson, Sr., Chairman of the Board, Mr. Robert A. Olson, Jr.,, President, and Richard A. Olson, Jr., Vice President, all of RAO Manufacturing Company were present. Mr. Richard Olson said that RAO Manufacturing Company was a corporation engaged mainly in the manufacture of sheet metal stampings, deep drawings, stamp and assemblies, along with tool and die making, engi:neering and related items to this process. In 1970 we purchased approximately 5 acres at 200 Mississippi Street N.E. We went ahead wi;th preliminary soil samples, ete., and also approached the Fridley City Council for land use approval, which was granted. At that time we mentioned that approximately half � this property was zoned commercial and that it would have to be rezoned industrial for our use: The Council had no objection to this rezoning. He said they had been trying to demolish the old buildings on this land and they have run into some problems with this, but we hope to have it completed very shortly. We are planning to start construc- tion on this property this spring with completion within six months. We also have a purchase agreement of a pie shaped wedge of approximately 68 feet that was west of their property, along the railroad right-of-way. Ne said this was part of Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park and was about 3/4 of an acre that is zoned M-1. He said they were proposing to construct a building of about 50,000 square feet which is 200 feet by 240 feet by 20 feet high. It would be built basically in the center of the property, 220 feet from the Easterly boundary of the property. The reason for building at this location was because of�the underpass project on Mississippi Street, which will limit aur access to the building to the Easterly portion of the property. Any future expansion of this building would be to the West. He presented a colored rendering of the proposed metal building which he said would have earthy colors. � Mr. Boardman said they did'have an option on the location of the building. r�f for some reason, the rezoning was denied, they could locate the building on property �� Planning Commission Meetinq - January 22, 1975 Paqe 3 that was already zoned M-1 and use the C-2S zoned property for parking. He said ^ it would be better to have the property all under one zoning, for resale purposes and because it would also be easier to administer. Mr. Robert A. Olson, Jr., said the only way they would want to use this property was�if it all had the same zoning. The property wouldn't have the same potential otherwise. He said the proposed 50,000 square foot building could be expanded to 100,000 square feet if this property was all M-1. If they could only build on the property that was presently zoned M-1, they couTd only expand their building to 75,000 square feet. He said the main reason for moving their business from Minneapolis to this location was so that they would have room for expansion. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Boardman that if this property was expanded ta its maximum, would there be enough room for parking? Mr. Richard Olson answered Mr. Harris. He said their present plan called for 57 stalls. Under the City Code we would need 52 stalls, and if this 50,000 square foot building was ��sed to the maximum, we would need 63 stalls. On this same drawing, we have provision for up to 100 staTls. If we went to the maximum of 100,000 square feet, we would need 165 stalls. This wauld all be on the Easterly portion of the lot. We do have room on the West for additional parking. He said they knew they had to provide additional parking as they expanded the building, so their expansion would be somewhat determined by this factor. He said he couldn't foresee expanding this property to its maximum in his lifetime, and who knew what mass transit there eould be at that time, which could change parking requirements. Mr. Harris asked what the setback requirements would be from adjoining properties? � Mr. Boardman said the property to the West was industrial (M-1) and the building m et the requirement there. South of the property was zoned R-3, and it meets the setback requirement for that zoning, East of the property the zoning was C-2S, and it met the setback requirements. Ne said there was some R-1 property across from part of the front of ihe building, so the entire setback for the frant of the building should be 100 feet. RAQ Manufacturing Company will be going to the Board of Appeals for a front yard variance from 100 feet to 70 feet. Mr. Boardman said it was felt that Mississippi Street was a . natural barrier between this property and the R-1 and would act as a buffer. If the variance was granted, we felt it was better to have this variance on the front setback rather than the rear yard so the building wouldn't infringe on the R-3 zoning. Mr. 6oardman continued that RAO would be using berming and landscaping across from the R-1 zoning which would be an additional buffer. - Mr. Robert A. Olson, Sr. said he felt this was a very unique piece of land. In view of the fact that Mississippi Street was going into an underpass situation, the only access to all this property was on the Eastern end. It was a good thing for the City to have this property under one ownership because of this one access. He said there wasn't even access to service the sanitary sewer line on this property from the street. Ne said RAO wauld provide access for tntis purpose. He said that no way would RAO .�ant' go ahead with the development of this property, with all the money it would cost for its development, and take a chance on getting it all the same zoning at a future date. He. said that at the time they acquired this property, there weren't any plans to upgrade Mississippi Street. Mr. Drigans asked how the access to this property was laid out in relationship '� to the underpass? Mr. Boardman said he thought there was about a four faot drop over the entire parkfng lot, and about a 2 foot drop`from the parking lot to the street. The grade starts to drop on Mississippi Street in the vacinity of 2nd Street. Mr. Clark said there would be about a 1% grade from the street into the parking lot of RAO. He Planning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Paqe 4 said the'grade on mississippi Street would be about 5q. �' Mr. Langenfeld said that he had noticed in the Council minutes of January 18, 1971 that Mr., Olson, Sr. had said that they wanted to be good neighbors, that they would save all the trees they could in the development of this property, and that truck traffic would be kept toward the railroad right-of-way, and that they did not intend their building to be an eyesore. Mr. Dick Olson said they had gone with�the earthy colors for this building because that seems to be the most popular concept at this time. Mr. Langenfeld asked if_ they had a night shift. Mr. Dick Olson said they did. They were in operation from 6 A.M. to 11 P.M. He said they have worked on the noise levels for both their employees and noise coming from the building itself. He said it was a quiet operation, and the design af the new building would have the production end of the business in the center of the building. He said he didn't •think noise would. ever be a problem and they had to meet the OSHA standards. Mr. Robert Olson, Sr. said he would answer the question on the truck traffic. He �aid it had been their iniention of having the trucks use an access near the railroad right-of-way, but due to the underpass, this was now impossible. � Mr. Harris asked if at any future date they were planning on a railroad spur. Mr. Dick Olson said they had no desire for one at this time, and doubted if they would ever need one. MOTION by Blair, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commissjon close the � Public Hearing on the rezoning request, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Company. Upon a voice vate, aIl voting aye, the mation carried unanimousl�. J'1 Mr. Drigans questioned if this type of manufacturing was allowed in M-1 zoning, which was the zoning the petitioner was requesting. He said the Code says that foundaries or metal fabrication plants are an excluded use in an M-1 district. � Mr. Narris said he thought this was a problem of technology again. He said that what the intention of the Code meant to exlude was forged steel metal fabrication, but just plain metal fabrication was something much different, such as just making metal frames for windows, for instance. Mr. Dick Olson said that because of the quietness of their operation, he thought they would conform to the requirements of M-1 zoning. Mr. Clark said they did appear before the City Council in 1971 and got land use appraval for this business, and were only told to get their entire property under the same zoning, which was M-1. Chairman Fitzpatrick said that if there was a serious question on whether this was a permitted use in M-1 zoning, this should probably be continued until we get clarificatian. Mr. Drigans said on one hand we have an operation with a 1ow noise level and they are in light metal fabrication, and on the other harid the Code says that metal fabrication plants are an excluded use in M-1 zoning, which probably means pound�ng and forging out of heavy metal products. He said he would like an interpretation of the Tanguage of tfie Code. - . Mr. Robert A. Olson, Sr. said that four years ago when they appeared before the Council, We were assured that we did comply with the regul.ations of M-1 zoning. He said � : �� Planninq Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Paqe 5 ^ Nasim Qureshi, who was City Engineer at the time, and the members of the City Council did visit our plant, and they were satisfied at that time that this would be the proper toning. Whether the present Council would agree with that would be something else. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Clark to get an opinion from the City Attorney on this question, and get the answer in writing. Mr. Clark said that he would. MOTION b� Drigans, seconded by Harris, that the,Planning Commission continue until February 5, 1975, the consideration of a rezoninc}'equest, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Company, to rezone from C-2S (qeneral shopping areas) to M-1 (Zight industrial areas) Lots 3-15, Lots 27-32, and part of Lots 2 and 16, a11 in B1oek 9, along with vacated alleys in B1ock 9, and the East half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to Block 9, a11 being in Lowe11 Addition to Fridley Park, the same being 200 Mississippi Street Northeast, to provide the administration time to research the interpretation of the language of the Code. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � Mr. Robert A. Olson, Sr. said he thought it was in the best interest of RAQ� Manufacturing Company to have this clarified also.: Mr. Clark said they could still go to the Board of Appeals and Building Standards- Design Control meetings as scheduled. They could make their recommendations subject to the rezoning being approved. � 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED PLAT, P.S. #75-01, CENTRAL VIEW MANOR 2ND ADDITION W. GUSTAVE DOTY : Being a replat of Parcel 4780, Section � 12, City of Fridley, Coun�y of Anoka, Minnesota, generally located between Central Avenue and Highway #65 N.E., North of 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. 4. � PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING RE UEST, ZOA #75-01, CENTRAL AUTO PARTS: To rezone from C-2S general shopping areas to M-1 light industrial areas all that part of Parcel 4780, Section 12, City of Fridley, that lies between the Northerly extensions of the East and West lines of Lot l0, BTock 1, Central View Manor, generally located just North of 1201 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #75-01, CENTRAL AUTO PARTS: Per Fridley City Code, Section 205.131, (A,8 to allow junk yards or baling of junk or rags in a building enclosed on all sides or when completely enclosed with a solid fence, to be located on that part of 4780, Section 12, City of Fridley, that lies between the Northerly extension of the West line of Lot l0 and the East lin� of Lot 16, Block 1, Central View Manor, to allow expansion of the boundaries of Central Auto Parts, 1201 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. , Mr, Gus Doty of Realco, Inc., and Mr. John Buzick of Central Auto Parts were present: Mr. Clark said these three requests should be considered together, because if the rezoning and special use permit aren't approved, there would be no reason to plat this property. , ^ Chairman Fitzpatrick read the Public Hearing notices on the proposed plat, P,S, #75=01, 'Central View Manor 2nd Addition, by ReaYco, Inc., the rezoning reques�, ZOA #75-01, to rezone from C=2S to M-1, and the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-01, by Central Auto Parts, all pertaining to all or part of Section 4780, Section � 12, City of Fridley, whichlies between Central Avenue��nd Highway #65 N.f., North of Planning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Page 6 ^ 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. . Mr. Clark said the land that was being platted was split in half a couple of years ago, at the zoning line by the now defunct American Auto Llstings. The East portion of the property wa�s occupied by Gustafson Grinding, arrd the balance of the property was vacant. Parcel 4780 was only 140 feet deep and 1,33� feet lonq. Mr. Doty Wanted to have another ]ot spl it pn,�th�s .pro(�e�ty � r�hich would have divided this parcel into three parts, but as you can tell from the Public Hearing notices, there would have been lengthy legal descriptions. He said he advised the petitioner to plat the property instead. This request was before the Plats & Subdivi.sions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee on January 15th and they recommended approval with three sti�ulations which were (1) Provide a 15 foot drainage and utility easement along the Northerly � portion of Lot 2, and on the North-South line between Lots 2 and 3, and along the South portion of Lot 3, (2) 7his approval subject to the rezoning request, ZOA #75-01, and a request for a Special Ose Permit, SP #75-01, by Central Auto Parts, being approved, and (3) A private covenant be put on Lot 2 so that this said Lot.2, Central V;ew Manor 2nd Addition, could only be sold to adjacent property owners who already have street access. Mr. Clark said this last stipulation was to prevent Lot 2 being sold as an isolated lot that didn't have street access: The petitianer was agreeable to these stipulations. Mr. Clark continued, saying that Central Auto P:arts, the tentative purchaser of Lot 2 of the proposed piat, has requested that the Westerly 60 feet of this lot be rezoned the same as the balance of Lot 2, which was�`M-1, and that a Special Use Permit be granted for all of the new Lot 2, so they can expand their salvage yard, He said that the City has had some problems with Central Auto Parts, most of them due to the fact that they didn't have enough space for their operation: Their business has � grown faster than they anticipated, so the addition of Lot 2, should solve most of their problems. They would have to discantinue parking damaged and partially dis- mantled cars in their parking lot, which was supposed to be for customer parking, and using property across the street, which they don't own, for parking. Their business would have to be confined to their own property, with a screening fence. � Mr. Clark said the staff had prepared a li"st of stipulations for the Planning Commission to consider in making their recommendation on the Special Use Permit. The first one was that there must definitely be a screening fence. The second was, that especially along the portiont�rat abuts the trailer park, there shauld be a� least a 1,0 footPl�ant�ing strip, like an evergreen hedge., outside and adjacent to otiier zoned property, to be eompleted by July l; 1975. The third stipulatian was that all storage, unloading and loading of inoperative vehicles be confined within the s�reening fence. (4) That parking of trucks, loaded or empty, be restricted to the area inside the �fenced lot, (5) That all dismantling or parts salvage be done inside the existing building, (6) No vehicle parking be allowed in the street or on any other land that is not authorized by the City Council ar the City. The last stipulation, number 7, was that this permit be for a period of time, to expire on July 31, 1976, and not be renewed unless all of the above stipulations were complied wfith. Mr. Clark said the reason the staff felt this should have a yearly review was because this hasn't worked out the way we thought when the original Special Use Permit was granted. There are three ways the petitioner can go with this operation. Either reduce his operation or- move out, or acquire more land for this operation. Mr. Clark said that Central Auto Parts owned Lots 10-15, Block l, in Central �"'1 View Manor. Mr. Fitzpatrick said that was why they were requesting the rezoning of the Westerly 60 feet of tot 2 then, so it would be the same zoning. Mr. Clark said that Lot 2 wa� in line with Lots 10-16, but Lot 16 belongs to another salvage yard. Mr. Clark said there were a couple of other comments he would like to make. Planning Commission Meeting January 22, 1975 _ P�ge � ^ He said the stipulation by the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee on the original request for a Special Use Permit was for a wood fence. The fence they have is not a wooden one. It was an 8 foot high screening fence. It was right on the property line, and we would like to see this fence moved back so there would be more room for some plantings. Mr: Harris said it didn't look as if there was much right-of-way in this area. Mr. Clark said there was a 60 foot right-of-wa�, but we weren't used to seeing an eight foot structure right on the property line, and that's what made it look so elose. Mr. Fitzpatrick asked if there was a fence on the property East of Central Auto Parts? Mr. Clark said there was. Mr. Drigans asked who owned Lots 16 - 18. Mr. Doty said this belonged to Fridley Auto Parts and that their fence was right in the property line also. Mr. Clark said he would have to say that there has been an improvement in the opertaion of Central Auto Parts in the last year and a half under the new ownership. He said Fridley Auto Body has cleaned up its operation also. Chairman Fitzpatrick said he thought they should consider the preliminary plat first, and be aware that Lot 2 in this plat did not have street access. Mr. Narris said the reason for the stipulation that there be a private covenant on Lot 2 was because we didn't want, at a future date, 'to have this lot change owner- ship to someone who didn't already have street access because the City could be placed in a position of tiaving to condemn street-right-of-way for this property. Mr. Drigans asked why the property now owned by Central Auto Parts couldn't be included in the replatting? Mr. Doty said there were legal complications because � of mortgages, etc., which would make this extremely difficult. Mr. Doty said he didn't know if the type of private covenant they were stipulating for this lot was legal or not, but it wauld have a limit of 22 years. He said he wasn't an attorney, but once this Lot 2 was a part of Central Auto Parts, he couldn't see that at would be considered as a separate property again. It wouldn't go tax forfeit unless all the property owned by Central. Auto Parts went forfeit. Mr. Doty said the only reason they were platting this property was to facilita�e the sale of Lot 2 to Central Auto Parts. � Mr. Clark said that if the City was put in a pasition where it would have to go through condemnation proceedings to give street access to Lot 2, this would all be assessed back to Lot 2. Mr. Doty said he was sure that Central Auto Parts would be agreeable to tying_ Lot 2 to their property and maybe they could provide a private easement over the �East half of Lot 15, so that if this lot did go tax forfeit, there would be street access. Mr. John Buzick, Central Auto Parts, said he wouldn't want to agree to this until he had talked to his partner and his attorney, as he didn't know what repercussions� there could be from this. Mr. Clark said that as long as Central Auto Parts still owned Lot 2, there would be no problem even if this easement was given, because it wouldn't be used for an access to Lot 2. This would just be a solution if Central Auto Parts had to sell this property. Mr. Harris said this would be a private driveway easement. Mr. Buzick said he had no ob�ection to most of the stipulations m�ntioned by Mr. Clark, but when it came to moving the fence in an the front of tFie property, he said there was so much sand that he couldn't see anything growing there except weeds. Mr. Boardman said there was sand all over the City, and there would have to be some - topsoil put in under the sod. He said nothing grows if its just put on top of the sand. Planning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Paqe 8 Mr. Buzick said that if they had to move the fence in, they would be losing ^ area again, and he thought they needed all the area they could get. He said the reason they didn't put in the wood fence was because it was against State regulations to have a wooden fence for this type of operation. Mr. Doty said tMat as long as the fence for Fridley Auto was on the property line also, he thought it was a little premature to expect Central Auto Parts to move their fence at this time. He felt that as long as this Special Use Permit was going to be subject to yearly review, this could be taken care of at a later time, Mr. Harris said they could wait for the natural screering between the C=2S zoning and the M-1 zoning until the C-2S property was developed. He said the screening fence should be brought in from the property line in this area also so the plantings could be put in at a later time, without moving the fence. He said the natural screening (plantings) should be started along the R-4 zoning during this years growing season. � MOTION by Harris, secanded by Blair, that the PZanning Commission cZose the Public Hearing on the proposed p1at, P.S. #i5-01, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, by;W. Gustave Doty. Upon a vozce vote, a1I voti.-:g aye, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION Tiy Drigans, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commision recommend to CounciZ approval of the proposed p1at, P.S. #75-01, Centra.Z View Manor 2nd Addition, by W. Gustave Doty, being a replat of Parcel 4780, Section 12, City of FridZey, County of Anoka, Mi.nnesota, generalZy Iacated between Central Avenue and Highway #65 N.E., North of 73 1/2 Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Provide a 15 foot drainage and utility easement along the Northerl� portion of Lot 2, and on the North-South Zine between Lots 2 and 3, and along the � 3outh partion of Lot 2. 2. Approval of this plat is subject �o the rezoning request, ZOA #75-0.Z, and the request for a.SpeciaZ Use Permit, SP #75-01, both requests by Centsal Auto Parts, being•appraved. 3. Subject to a 30 foot private easement being granted from 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. to Lot 2, so this 1ot wouZd have street access if ever needed. UPON a voice vote,:a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimousiy. MOTION by Dr.igans, seconded by B1air, ttiat the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing an the rezoning request, ZOA #75-01, by Central Auto Parts. Upon a voice vo�e, a1I voting aye, the mot.ion carried unanimousZy. t10TION by Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commiss.ion recommend to Council approval of the rezoninq request, ZQA #75-OZ, by Central Auto Parts, to rezone from C-2S (general shapping areas) to M-1 (Iight industrial areas), a.Zl that part of ParceZ 4780, Section I2, City of Fridley, that lies between the Northerly extension of the East and West Zines of Lof 10, B1ock 1, Central View Manor, generally Iocated just North of 1201 73 1/Z Avenue N.E., subject to the approval of a Special Use Permit, SP #75-OI, for Central Auto Parts. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. - MOTION by B1air, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commission c.Iose the - ^ Public Hearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, 5P #75-01, by Central Auto Parts. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Planninc� Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Page 9. ^ Mr. Buzick said he wouldn't want to agree that no dismantling at al1 would be done outside the building.. Sometimes someone needs a door or some other part for a rush job, and although they don't like to dismantle outside, in an emergency they do it. He said that he.would agree that no major dismantling be done outside the building. The Planning Commission members agreed to this, on an emergency basis. Mr. Clark said he would have no objection as long as this didn't cause noise pollution. He said they could monitor the operation, and check this stipulation at the time of renewal of this Special Use Permit. Mr. Clark said he thought the review of this Special Use Permit should be during the growing season, rather than a year from today. If they should recommend more fencing or plantings at that time, it would be easier to comply with at that time of the year. MOTION .by. Drigans, seconded by B1air, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approval of the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-OI, by Central Auto Parts, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.13Z (A,8), to allow junk yards or b_Zing of junk or rags, in a building enclosed on a.Z1 sides, or when completly enclosed wit1� a solid fence, to be located on the part of Parcel 4780, Section 12, City of Fridley, that 1j�s_.between the Northerly extension of the West �ine of Lot IO and the East line of Lot 16, B1ock I, Central View Manor, to allow expansion of the boundaries of Central Auta Parts, 1201 i3 1/2 Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: � - 1. Provide an 8 foot sereening fence, 10 feet from the property 1ine. 2. Provide a 10 foot planting strip outside this fence. The planting strip .�4n the North praperty line adjacent to the R-4 zoning, to be planted in the 1975 growing season. The plant.ing strip adjacent to the C-2S zoned property alonq the West side of Lot 2, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, and a.Iong the West side of Lot 10, B1ock 1, Central View Manor, to be determined at the time of the review of the Special Use Permit, dependent upon the development of the C-25 zoned property. � 3. A11 storage, unloading and loading of inoperable vehicZes be confined inside the screening fen�e. _ 4. Parking of trucks, loaded or empty, be restricted to the area inside the feneed 1ot. 5. 6. A11 majar dismantling be done inside the existing building. No vehicle parking in the street or on any other unauthorized area be allowed. 7. This Special Use Permit will expire and be up for renewal on Ju1y 31, Z976 and wi11 not be renewed unless a11 of the above stipulatians have been;:satisfied. UPON a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the mbtion carried unanimously. 6. DISCUSSION: ^ Mr. Clark said they would like to keep a light meeting of February 5, 1975 so this couYd be used as Jerry Boardman was scheduled for another meeting on attending this meeting. agenda for the Planning Commission a workshop meeting. He said that that date, and would not be Planning Commission Meetinq - January 22, 1975 Page 10 _____ Mr. Clark said he hadn't been aware of posting Public Hearing notices three days in advance of the meeting, but he would�see that they were posted, so'they wouldn't � have to be read. NOTE: Upon checking, the City Charter only says ordinances and resolutions have to be read. It was the CounciZ's decision to post these three days prior to the meetinq so they could waive the reading. There is no requirement to read the PubZic Hearing notice on anything else. Therefore, there shouldn't be a motion to waive the reading of the Public Hearing notice. Instead there should be a motion to open the Public Hearing, stating the time, and a motion to close the Public Hearing, stating the time. � Mr. Harris said he had attended the special Council meeting on Saturday, January 18th. He said members of the Ghamber of Commerce were present and voiced some dis- satisfaction with the City. He said he invited them to send a representative to the Planning Commission workshop meetings as we were working on the City Code. :He_as.ked the secretary to notify Mr. Dunn that the workshop meeting this month would be on February 5th. Mr. Langenfeld said he had some comments on the joint meeting wi�h the Bn�keway Committee. He had some basic concerns, which were: 1. Safety 2. If this Committee decides to tax the individual, he thought it would be- no deal. � 3. Public lighting 4. Proper'�notification to individual residents 5. Check sources of immediate funding to see where we would stand on a C1ass I project � 6. He thought they should stick to Phase I and check more thoroughly with the railroad, because this was a major probiem Mr. Langenfeld said he did learn a lot at this meeting, and wanted to thank the Chairman for the invitation. Mr. Drigans asked that copies of the minutes of this meeting be made available for the Planning Commission. Mr. Harris said he agreed with Mr. Langenfeld's concerns and thought that it came down to how this would be paid for. He said it could be paid for out of property taxes, or they did have some other alternatives, but whether those aTternatives woGld be available with our present economy, might be in some doubt. Mr. Langenfeid said that according to the figures given at the meeting, the bikeway would cost $321,�380. It was broken down into five phases and Phase I would cost $62,000, so we are talking about a lot of money. Mr. Urigans asked if there had been a priority set up as to what would come first, ^ the bikeways or the walkways. Mr. Clark said Phase I was the bikeways. Mr. Urigans said he felt that more people could use walkways than bikeways. Mr. Blair said that when you were talking about that much money, he felt the City had need for other things, such as an activity center. I .��I Planninq Commission Meeting - January 2'L, 1975 Paqe ll Mr. Harris mentioned the Civic Center at Brooklyn Center. Most of the members /`� said someone from their family had used this facility and were familiar with it. Mr. Harris that this center wasn`t anything fancy, but it was a very functional building. Mr. Harris said the Bikeway Committee started out with a survey. lhey found there were 28 neighborhoods in Fridley with no cohesive force to pull them together. We don't have one school district. There is no common denominator in the City of Fridley. Mr. Langenfeld said he thought that one af the purposes of the bikeway was to eradicate the naturai and man-made barriers. Mr. Harris said that a civic center, or youth center, or whatever you want to call it, could make a focal point. Mr. Drigans said the property that the Wall Corporation owns would�be a good location for something like this, because the library was already at that location. Mr. Harris said the problem was to find funding for this purpose. Mr. Fitzpatrick said Fridley had a great need for indoor recreation facilites. Mr. Drigans said it seemed to him that we could get some of these things, like an indoor swimming po�l and an�activity center, along with the armory. He felt there should be a study made on how much it would cost us to have an armory large enough to have it combined with a youth center, indoor swimming and/or other indoor recreation. Mr. Blair said he felt this would be the easiest way for Fridley to get these facilities. He said the indoor armory parade ground could be used for an indoor gymnasivm. Mr. Clark said the Council would be having a Public Hearing on the armory proposal on February lOth. Mr. Drigans said he thought funds should be made available to have an arhitect come up with some alternate plans for what Fridley might want to incl�de in an armory. Mr:� Blair'said there should be plans from other armories where they had � combined facilities. Mr. Fitzpatrick said there probably were, but at their meetings on the armory, they didn't hear of anyplace that had extensive i�door recreation. Mr. Clark said the City could have almost anything they wanted in an armory, but they wou1d have to be willing to pay for it too. Mr, Drigans said that if it was something that the Natianal Guard could use also, the State would share in this cost, but not the Federal Government. He said he thought the armory proposai was at the Council level prematurely, and should probably be referred back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Clark said it would depend upon how the Council feels about a youth center. If they - aren't in favor of this, then it goes back to just being an armory proposal. Mr. Drigans said the armory could be a dual purpose building, and this might make it more palatable to the community. ADJOURNMENT: ' MOTION by B1air,�seconded by Harris, that the meeting be adjourned. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye,_Chairman Fitzpatrick declared the Planning Commission meeting of January 22, 1975 adjourned at 11:20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �.� - '"l�ow.�,n/ ^ Uorothy Evens , Secretary , . ` � JOINT ME�TING Or CITIZEN BIIC�WAY, PLANNING COMMISSION, & PARKS AND RECR�TION.COMMISSION January ?, 1975 MEMBERS PRES�NT: Bill Gerads, Dennis Schneider, Vern Moen, Bobbi Spaeth, Lee Iiouck, Jerry Boardmar�, Jan Thomas, SgC. Wilkinson, and Bette Papke OTHERS PRESENT: Richard Harris, Jim Langen£eld, Hubert Lindblad, and Shirley Caldwell Chairman Vern Moen opened the meeting at 7;42 p.m. . � � �2 _ Jerry Boardman said the idea of ha�r.ing a joint meeting with the PXanning � Commission and Parks Commission members was to find out their views on the Bikeway system. He explained that the bookle'- which he gave to everyone included the goals and objectives of the committee, past minutes, and informativn relating to the systea�. Mr. Moen said the system was set up according to different stages, Stages 1 being pilot bikeway system. Stage 2 would involve tying the system in together. Stage 3 would further complete and extend it as would Stages 4 and .. S. Mr. Harris asked how much Sfiage l will cost? Mr. Boardman said the entire � package was estimated at 5321,000o The cost would be approximately $62,422 for phase 1. The total estimate on county roads was $8,900 with $3,535 worth of signs, totaling to $12,525. The estimate of city roads were $5,020, $2,94Q for signs totaling to $8,460, Mr, Boardman went over some of the goals of the committee including safety, high recreational potential use, providing an.other mode of transportation, � environmental and ecological considerations, flexibility, promoting public awareness, etc. Mr. Boardman said the sidewalk system and the bitce�aays system would be twa different proposals but proposed in the same bookleto ,Stage 1 would be developed as mostly on-street lanes, They studied and discussed Phase 1. Mr. Boardman showed diagrams of alternatives other cities had used in setting up thezr lanes on-street, consisting of a bike lane on a one way streeC, bike lanes with no parking, bike lane with curb divider, Uike lane with curb and parking. The committee 3iscussed the use of the system and the subject . of banning parking. Mr. Harris said it would be invaluable to invest this much aaoney if the system was used only 6 or 7 months a year. Mro Baardman said the system would be used definitely more than that, ma.ny people would use bicycling as a mocles of transportation in the winter if zhere were access. Mr. klarris questioned how the bikeways would be maintained. Mr. Boardman said it would be maintained by the City, Mr. Harris said th9.s would add to the estimated cosC. Mr. Boardmnn presented the funding possibiliC�es: (1� Grants and�Aid Program �� (2) Luwcon - 50% £ederal, 25% state, 25% local (3) Community Development Block - Grants thruu�h the development of HUD (4) rederal Aid Urban (5) rtSAS - Minnesota State Ai:d S�reets (6) Revenue sharing monies (7) help from community services organizations (8) bicycle licensing fees (9) DonaCions:(10) Issue Bonds , � . (il.) Streees nnd Traffi.c Conwrol �ud�eC (12) PAxlt und Recreat•ion Bud�et -� 7 (13) Olher bucl�;et monie.s L-IiaL- coul.d be ullocaL'ed (l�f) County participation on H13 � County roads. Ite saicl the next L-wo sCaf;es. the conuniCCce must cover including �undi.n�; is lc�al, whaC kind ot law chan�es musC be made to malce a su�er system, n and other essential tliinbs relaCed to the bikeway system. Mr. llarris aslced Mr. Boardman wfiich were the best estimates oi how the system would be funded. Mr. P,oardman said probably ttirough MSAS, CounCy participation, Street•s and Tratfic Control �udget, Partcs and Recreation Budget, and com,munity sexvice organiz�tions. Mr. Harris thought it was the idea to get a system in wittiouti ].evying more taxes on taxpayers. Mrs. Thomas said there will probably be areas that wi31 need som� street 1i�htin�. Mr. Boardman said they would rema�.n with the street lights, but iC may be necessary to install more street 1i:ghts in some areas such as Osborne. A discussion was held on on-�rade crossings, bridges, and overpasses, Mr. Board-nan said one of the major costs of the sys::em is br:Ldge construcCion, intersection . remodiiications, railroad protection, etc. �Hpsbert Lindb�ad asked if there were any provisions being made on the underpass on Mississippi wh;le they are building. Mr, Baardman s«id te�o side�calks on encli side of the street is being provided, �and then there will be stripino on Mississippi. rir. Boardman said he had received a reply from Burlin�;ton Northern (crossings :r 61st and 63rd) presently bein� used for crossings anyway, and the Railroad says this is not permissable, .and if the City would like to pursue it further it must go througb the�Public Safety Commission. Mr. Boardman su;gested in some areas setting up alternate routes or determine whether they want to go with an underpasso Mr. Eoardman said they could install an overpass bridge �ahich would be �qui.te expensive or pushing a pipe underneath the rai.lroad tracks. He said it caould be a gooci recommendation to suggest a tunnel beneath the tracks. . /"1 : . . � The committee furthsr discussed off-street parking, particularly in the Cocnmons � Park area, and Mr. Boardman felt the Parks Commission is going to have to make 8 xecomm�ndation on it. The corLmission discussed banning a�d Mr. Boardman said �t� the last meeting they had decided upon total ban:�ing on Mississippi, Old Central, and Osborne. Mr. Moen suggested havin� a-seasonal. ban or hourlq ban •' where necessary. Curbi.ng was brought up and Shirley Calcltaall suggested pre-fab curbing, Mx. Moen said this paxticular type of curhing is discouraged in most areas, because of the high possibility of dama�es to curbing especially by sno�caplowso Jerry Boardman said after toni�ht's meeting, t�ao or three more meetings will be held, they �oill decide defi.nitely what will be in the proposed plan,'and ' then the Bikeway system will hold puUlic hearingso Articles will be published in the paper along with niaps stiacaing tfie ciCizens wtiere the route system will , go� witE� an explanation of cahat the system will entai.l, Mrs. Caldwell said she was very much in favor oi the bikecaay system, but felt it should be kepC separate from thc sidewalk system. Mr. Boardman said the CommiCtee had set up a vcry minor sidewallc sysCe:n with only tlie necessary si�ewallcs proposed. }le sai.d Osbornc, East Fiver I:oad, and 7th Streets were piancluCory for sidewalks� buC each.sysCem would be kepC separate in the plan. ^ AnJOUFNPt�NT ,Vern rtoen �ielcared the mec�i,ng Ad journed ut 10:10 p.m. TEie next meeting is Wadncsduy, Januury 22. Rospectiully, � ��,��1 �,,, � %•�./ 1.�,/) _ . � 1 � � ' • 11 \ J � ■ ► _ ' i �:.i ► ' ►II � _ l _.� � � � - � - Meetiriq was called to ordex at 7:40 p.m. by Chai�nan Blair. MFS�ERS PRESENT: Blair, Caldwell, Harris, wagar �4 n N'�ERS EXCUSED: Peterson pri'f�RS pRESE�7T; Ed Dupay, 5618 Sth Street N.E., Fridley, 560-1302, F.Y.F.A. Don Nelson, 5797 Washington St. N.E., Fridley, 566-2329, F.Y.F.A. �Chuck Kasick, 7361 Concerto Curve, Fridley, 786-2345 F.Y.F�A� RULE CHANGES Mr. Blair said that the biggest change in the rules would be in the period times. He said that currently the Pony and PeeWee's play 10 minutes, ar�7. the Cubs play 12 minutes. The change would have the Pony and PeeWee's playing 8 minutes anc3 the Cubs playing 10 minutes. This change will conform to high school rules. He stated also that they were adding paragraph 54., which states when the point difference in any of the three divisions exceeds 25 points, the r�nairxler of the game will be played using running time. He mentioned that the time-outs at the er�cl of eaeh half will be changed also. He said that there will not be charge time-out, just a notification to the bench arxi nlay will continue. Rule 7.3 also has a change, in that naw the timeout will be charged to the team rather than the officials. This will ensure that the coaches can go out and make certain that the boy is alright when injured. Mr. Brown suggested that they take the 7.3 rule and revamp it thanselves, and then cane back to the Caranission when it is settled. Mr. Blair asked Mx. Dupay and hi-s Board to review these itens and get back to the Cam�ission. Mr.�Dup�y mentioned that he had a few rule changes himself whi.ch he wrxil.d like to impl�nent. Mr. Blair ecmmented that the only other iten was that they wanted the w�igh-ins /� t,o be conducted by a representative of the teams rather than game officials. He � said that way they can get the kids weighed in and aut on the field quicker. Mr. Nelson sai.d that he wr�uld like to see the weigh rule changed so that mr�re kids who are overweight, could play. Mr. Dupay said that might be sanething they could look into. Mr. Blair c�nted that he would like to see the equignent weighed so that the boys wouldn't have to strip down. Mr. Blair said that he wished to discuss the paragraph on participation which states that each boy shall play an equivalent to one series of dvwns each half. He said that he wr�uld li.ke to see it increased, as he didn't feel that was enough• He asked Mr. Dupay to look into it. Mr. Blair mentioned that they should call the Park Office between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays, and on weekends they should call the H.A.F. President frcan 12:00 to 1:00 p.m. in case of poor weather. SCOREBOARD Mr. Dupay said that he was concerried regarding the new scoreboard. He wanted to know if Mr. Brcx�m was going to have saneone running it. Mr. Brown'replied that the City will be providing saneone, but that if the F.Y.F.A. wants a P. A. Syst�n, t,hey will have to provide it. He said the City would be paying so�neone per game ar�d he will have control of the lights, opening the gates, opening the building, and running the electric scoreboard. This will be his job. He explained that they can't have 10 or 15 fans, etc. up in that scoreboard, as the building is not �`1 that large, plus sc�ieone could get hurt going up and down, fooling around. He said that they will post a sign stating that it is a dangerous ladder, for the kids to keep off. . 0 . 15 Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Ccnmission Meetinc� Januaxy 20, I975 �age 2 � Mr. Dupay asked Mr. Brvwn about sodding the football field at Camions. Mr. Hrown explained that they'are going to reseed it first, and if that isn't success- ful, which it sh�uld be, then they will resod it. Mr. Nelson mentioned that they had talked about contributing to the cost of the sod and installing it. Mr. Brown explained that if the reseeding is done properly, it is guaranteed. He said that if it doesn't w�rk out in 1975, they wauld welcan�e th�e help and cantribution in 1976. _ �.+ r:: Mrs. Caldwell brought up the point that the coaches have probl�ns with the audience and players. She said that if there were scme sort of "cli.nic" for the parents to participate in, they could better understand the rules, and there w�auld be less proble�ns. She said that she already knaws several mr�thers who will personally call each hcane arld try to get those garents out. She said that if the coaches would explain the rules arid. etiquette of being fans it would make a hig difference. Mr. Dupay felt that was a good idea and suggested that Mrs. Caldwell v�ntact Helen Bryne, the Director of Girls F1ag Football. Mr. Nelson n�ntioned that last year many of the coaches had a''parents night" the first few weeks of the:season and explained to then the rules, what excuses were acceptable for not �atte,nding practics, etc. Mr. Kasick said that there are new proposed rules. When they are finalized, they will be given to the children to take hane. Mr. Brawn mentioned that it was up to the Board to review the rules. Mr. Blair said that he would be glad to attend the Board meeting to discuss the rule changes when they are ready. ^ Mr. Dupay said that the association which they have farnled is the Sports Association, which includes football, girls flag football, wranen's auxiliary, basketball, ar�d Babe �.ith ba.seball. He said that Helen Bryne is ham�ling the gixls flag football. He said that she should have a Board of Directors. Mr. Blair asked if the Sports Association ovexlooks the .rules arid policies of their divisions. Mr. Dupay replied that they did. Mr. Hrawn discussed the fact that in the original agree�nents the rules and regulations have to be approved by this Cce�mission. He said that they were going to have to contact Mr. Nielsen and go over the oId agre�nents and restructure al1 tY� sports. He said that the City puts out a great deal of money and they have an obligation. He also mentioned that the Depart=nent has to take it's hat off to all the fellows in the Football Association, for the job it does every year. He said he wr�uld hate to think of what tiie City would have to pay if it was all on a dollar per hour value. He thanked then for all the work they have done on behalf of the citizens of Fridley. Mr. Blais said that he also wished to thank than for a11. their efforts. He thanked th+�n for ecming and asked th�n to ccane back when they get their reorgani.zation done. MO7I�N by Ncvvub, decanded by Glagcve, �o a��nave �he M.i.nu,te,� o� �he Pank and Reenea,t.i.on Camm,i,6.��.on Mev�ti:ng, dcLted Decembe�c 23, 1�914. The mo�',i.an ca�vu.ed. ffiKEWAYS C'CY�M'IITi�E MEEZ�NG ^ Mrs. Caldwell asked if it wr�uld be possible for us to have parkim3 in the school parking lot. She said that there will be a problgn with the bikeway paths in that there will be no parking on the street. Mr. Dupay said that we need a sign stating there is additional parking in the school parking lot. Mr. Brawn said that the school will allaw parking there. Mrs. Caldw�ell mentioned that the ,� �,' Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Cca�mission Meeting January 20, 1975 Page 3�� Bik�ways Ccarmittee requested that she encourage the City an�d the school to do what- ever is necessary in order to get the people to park in the school parking area, be- r"1 cause the parking restrictions will present parking will present parking problens. Mr. Blair said that the bikesaay systan is designed as a transportation systen, rather than a reereation syst�n. � ►��:,�u.� : : Mr. Brawn stated that the phone survey on snawmobile and letter on snowmobiles in Locke is for the CamLission's inforniation. He said that there are only two cities out of the entire poll that provide snowirr�bile areas on land. They are Fridley and Edina. Mr. Harris asked N1r. Brown what he proposed to do with Locke Park in regard to sn�amobiling. Dsr. Brown replied that the City Council approved altern,ative #2, which states that sncxamobiling is allawable and should be pasted. He sa.id that the new state law is that if you allaw it, you must put signs stating it is allawed. The Ca�nission discussed the fact that they feel snawmobiling will not be allowed in Fridley in a few years, due to abuse of private property, etc. .��i ._ , . � Mr. Brawn reported to the Ccmmission that he had received a letter fran a ministex� of one of tfie churches in Fridley, c:cmplaining about hockey games being scheduled on Sundays. He said that he had given a copy to Bob O).mstead, President of the Hockey Association. Mr. Blair mentioned that he had talked to Mr. Olmstead about the letter and Mr. Olmstead said that the conflict was not with the City c�oup, but with District #l0, because they are scheduling the games on Saturday <and Sunday, and th.is the Hockey Association has no control over. Mr. Brawn said that the Hockey Associatian should cantact District #l0 and advise them that they have scxne concerned people. He stated that he realized that this is the.only time they can get indoor ice, so that is why they schedule the games then, hawever, people should have the right to go to church if they so desire. Mrs. Caldwell suggested that the Fridley Hockey Association state they will not play games scheduled on Sunday, but Mr. Harris pointed out that scene kids would show up ancl sane not, resulting in Fridley's games being forfeited. ��: ,� � ; •:� Mr. Brawn said that Gary Stimmler had called him in regard to the goalie shoulder pads. Mr. Stimnler felt that the City should provide than. Mr. Brawn said that we already provide ches protectors. Mr. Bra�m explained to N1r. Stimmler that the kids probably w�n't wear thgn, they'll throw th�n in a corner, etc. Mr. Harris pointed out that you wr�uld have to have different sizes, and you run into a probl�n there. Mr. Brown said that he felt that shoulder pads are really a personal piece of equi�xnent. He said that maybe they should talk to the H.A.F. about providing than. Mr. Harris cc�enented that if you start to pravide shoulder pads for the goalies, where do you draw the line. Mr. Brc�m pointed out that many of the kids buy their own hockey sticks, and don't even use the ones provided by the City. • M�TI�N by Ulagan, aeconded by Ccc.2dwe,P.� �a accep� �he �napoded mee.#,i.ng da�e�s �an �he Pcvclz.� and Reche_a�',i..on Comm-i.;���.an Mee.ti.ng�s �an 1975. The ma�i.an ecvvc.i.ed. (VAMING OF PARK PROPERTY _ ^ Mr. Brawn explained that we need to name the park property by Farr Lake, Harris �' Lake, Blencoe, and East River Road. Mrs. Caldwell suggested that the el�nentary children in the various sclzools near each park, have a contest and be allawed to • '� � Minutes o� the Parks & Recreation Camtission Meet�ng January 20, 1975 Page 4 ^ su�nit names. Mr. Blair stated that'that had be�n done the last three tin�s and oould be done again. Mr. Brc�m said that the children at Rice Creek 5chool could name the Harris Lake park, the chil•dren at North Park and Gardena Schools could name Farr Lake, the children at Riverwood could name Glencoe and the children at Stevenson School could name East River Road Park. Judy Wyatt, Parks Secretary was designated as chaizmaiz of the civic groups delegated to judging the naming of North Park. She was instructed to contact four other leaders fran civic groups to fozm a cca�mittee to judge the entries far North Park. AAIOURNMEM" MOTI ON �a ad� awcn �he mee�'.i.ng cc,i 9: 2 5 p. m� The next regular meeting will be held on Monday, February 24, 1975 at 7:30 p.m., in the Canminity Roan of Fridley Civic Center. Respectfully sulmi.tted, udy [nly tt, Secr � to the Cannission ^ . � .� �a :� 8 BUILDING STANDARDS-vESIGN CONTR�L SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1975 � Chairman Lindblad caTled the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. � MEMBERS PRESENT: Lindblad, Seeger, Tonco ME��IBERS A6SENT: Simoneau, Neison . OTHERS PRESENT: Howard Mattson, Engineering Aide MOTION by Tonco, seconded by Seeger to approve the minutes o� the ' January 9, 1975 meeting. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO COHSTRJCT A I�EI� Bl1ILDING TO BE USED AS A WRREHOUSE: LOCA.TED ON LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 8, �JNA�JAY: THE SAME BEING 7791 ELM STREET, FRIDLEY �iI��MESOTA REQUEST BY FACO . MASONRY G0�lTRACTORS INC, 5920 �JORTH KTRKGt00D LANE, P�IINl��EAPOLIS MINNESOTp 55442 Mr. Steven Spraungel represented Paco Masonry in their request, � - t�lr. Spraungel presented a new set af plans for the �varehvuse. Mr. Lindblad led in a discussion an the use of par{cing on the side of the building, which is now being used according ta code in the new plan. Mr. Tonca asked about the use o�F a bumper rail against the building in front of the parking area. r'1 Mr. Spraungel stated he would have to use a 6umper rail because of the shortage of space needed for parking stalls, and that the sidewalk in front of the par.king stalls would be eliminated. Mr. Tonco stated the bumper rail should conform to the size used in past warehouse buildings constructed 6y Paco Masonry. Mr. Lindblad stated th� precast curbing could 6e used but only an a temporary 6asis on the south side of tFie parking 1ot. P�OTION by Tonco, seconded by Seeger, ta recommerzd �pproval of the plan - with ihe failowing stipulations: 1. Present in writing names of shrubs and trees used in the landscaping io the City Council. 2. Precast curbing may be used at the South boundary of the,property, .� but if in a year additional property is not acquired to the South, - then poured eoncrete shouid be installed. Performance bond set at $i500. 3. Security lights should be installed around the building and in the parking 1ot. 4. Refuse will be kept inside of the building unless space is nc� available, a screened in area will then be provided outside. � � ,/'1 �1 �9 BUILDING STAf�iDARDS-DESIG�t CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1975 f'q.-2 5. Bumper rails used between the building and parking 1ot should be 8° X 8" 4rooden posts attached directly to the building with metal guard strips attached to the posts. ' 2. CONSIDERATIOI� Of A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDINr TO BE IJSED � AS A MA[�UFAC7URING FACILITY. LOCATED AT 20Q MISSISSIPPI STRE�T N.E.., RE UES7 BY RAO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 2010 NOR7H 4th STREET, MIIVNERPOLIS, MINNESOTA � Mr. Richard Olsen, tfir. Robert 01sen, Senlor, and Mr. Robert Olsen, Junior were present for the request. Mr. Richard Olsen presented the building plans and an artists rendering of the building as it wi11 look when it is completed. Mr. Tonca discussed the use of precast eurbing and that the committee wauld not accep� its use if expansion of the building would eontinue over a three-year period. i•4r. Olsen stated the building expansion would contlnue over a ter�-year period. • Mr. Lindblad stated that poured cancrete should be used. Mr. Olsen said .he wauld agree to the poured concrete curbing. f1r. Olsen stated the outside of the building is metal, 20 feet high, and that the office part of the building will have a heavy rock work, and colared panels contrasting with the color of the rest of the building. P�fr. Tonco asked if the colored panels were part of the structure of the building. Mr. Olsen stated the co7ored panels were not part of the structure of the building but for decoratian purposes only. Mr. P�attson questioned the consistency of the rock wall with the rest of the building and asked if the low pitched raof must be maintained. The committee agreed to the use of the pitched roof and suggested that some further treatment of the wall be investigated. . I�1r. Lindblad discussed the view of �he building from the North and South sides. f�r. Tonco suggested that a pilaster-like projection every 4Q or 50 feet with some periodie lighting on the South wall would help to break up the long expanse of wa11 on that side. Mr. Lindblad stated that he t�iought one or two contrasiing panels on both the South and North sides might be all that would be necessary to break up the long wa11 expanse and create more interest. Mr. Tonco asked about outside storage of refuse. ,-,�r,, �0: 6UILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 23, T975 P.-3 ^ Mr. �llsen stated all unused materials would be stored in the buildin . � ��lOTIOi� by Seeger second�d by Tonco, to recommend approval of the plan � with t.he following stipulations. 1. Recommend appraval subjec� to the Board of Appeals 70 foot variance. 2. Recommend approval subject to the Planning Commission zoning the property M-1. 3. Refuse to be placed inside the 6uilding or provide a screened in area outside. _ 4. Security lights all around the building a►�d Zr, the parking lo�. 5. Sodding used where specified on plans. � .- 6. Designated landscaping design �iith tFie names of shrubs and trees being used be put in writing before g�ing to Gouncil. 7. Poured concrete curbing and black top driveway. 8. Pdew design plan for the building on a port�on of the North wall and the entire South wa11. � UPON A VOICE YOTE, all voting aye, tfie motion carried unanimously. Chairman Lindblad adjourned the meeting at 10:20 P.C1. Respectfully submitted, ��/�-�-�-4-- ��rn..-t/L_-�2_. . - Arlene L. Smith Secretary ,. � , THE MINUTES'OF TFiE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 28, 1975 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Drigans at 7:30 P.M. ^ MEMBERS PRESENT: Drigans, Crowder, Gabe1, Plemel, Wahlberg MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Howard Mattson, Engineering Aide 1. �1 MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Gabel, to approve the minutes of the January 14, 1975 meeting as written. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. A_RE�UEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.134, 6, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE SETBACK BETWEEN THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND A STREET LINE, WHEN ADJACENT TO ANOTHER ZONING DISTRICT, (ALONG THE FRONT LOT LINE) FROM THE REQUIRED 100 FEET TO 70 FEET, TO ALL047 THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MANUFACTURING BUILDING AND WAREHOUSE TO BE LOCATED ON LSJTS 1 THROUGH 15, APJD LOTS 2£3 THROUGH 32, AND PART OF LOTS 16 AND 27, ALL IN BIACK 8, LOTS 3 THROUGH 15, AND PART OF LOT5 2, 16 AND 27 THROUGH 32, ALL IN BLOCK 9, AND THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING ADJACENT TO SAID BLOCK 8, AND THE VACATED ALLEYS IN �LOCKS 8 AND 9, AND VACATED MAIN STREET AND VACATED ELM STREET, ALL BEING IN LOWELL ADDITION TO FRIDL�Y PARK, THE SAME BEING 200 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINN. (RE UEST BY RAO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 2010 NOR�irI 4TH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.) Mr. Dick Olson, representing RAO Manufacturinq, was present to present the request. MOTION by Crowder, seconded bg Wahlberg, to waive reading the public hearing notice. Upon a voice vot�, there being no nays, the motion carried. Chairman Drigans stated that this same property is before the Planning Commission for rezoning and also was before Buildinq Standards-Desiqn Control. He said ��urrentiv the Plannina Commission has tabled the rezoninQ for a leaal opinion from the Citv Attornev as to this tvpe of business operation (metal fabricatio�n) beinct a2lowed in an M-1 Zonina. He said the Zonina Code could be interpreted to exclude it from M-1 Zonina and the Planninq Commission wants a leqal opinion on the intent of this part of the Code. Chairman DriQans added the petitioner has verified that certain naise levels are within the standards. He said that the Board of Appeal's action, if it is approval, should be contingent upan the approval of the rezoning. Mr. Dick Olson showed the plot plan of the property to the Board. He stated on this property, the setbacks are basically determined by the adjacent zoning districts. He said the front yard sstback would usually be 35 feet but because of the different zoning, they are required to set back 100 feet. He said the back yard setback would usually be 25 feet but because of the different zoning and an easement it has to be 50 feet. Mr. Olson said they have set out the building as a whole, with maximum land use. He said they have placed the building as far to the west as possible because of the railroad tracks, and also as far back into the lot as possible. He said they have tried to design the building to be as wide as.the lot would allow and still not be all stretched out. He said the building would be an all steel building and to go to the next smaller width size, would require changing the parking area from the side to the front. Mr. Olson said they would prefer to stay with the 50 foot rear yard setback and ask for the variance on the front yard because the residential property to the back might be developed someday. Mr. Oison stated that because of the proposed improvement of Mississippi Street, there should be no problem if the variance was granted. He said since the street ^ will be flipping at this location, their building will be fronting a retaining wall and not Mississippi Street. He said this retaining wall comes in by Main Street and the street is depressed from there on. He added that there will be a frontage road before Mississippi Street and the houses to the north of Mississippi Street so there should be no objections from these`people as RAO will not really be ,,"�'� " The Minutes of the Board of Ap�eals Subcommittee Meeting of January 28, 1975 Page 2 encroaching on their property. '�`� Mr. Plemel stated the plot plan shows the proposed building plus a possible future. ^expansion. He asked if the expansion would also be metal. Mro Olson answered that they have to plan on complete usage of the land and the complete building will be all metal construction. Mr. Olson showed the Board a colored rendering of the building. Mr. Olson explained their building will consist of a concrete slab, a structural steel frame for the walls and ceiling, and sculptured steel panels that have a textured look bolted onto the frame. He added the panels are painted at the factory and are quaranteed for 20 years. He said they are quite efficient. Mrs. Wahlberg asked what the efficiency rating was. Mr. Olson said heat and noise wise, the efficiency rating was equal to a 3 foot concrete block wall. Mr. Olson added that because of the residential property to the north and south of this building, they will have their production space in the middle of the building, surrounded by concrete walls, plus the outside steel walls, so there should be no problems with noise. He added that this type of building is more expensive than a concrete building, but because of the heat savings and expansion savings, the buildings pay for themselves. He said for expanding, a wall can be unbolted from the frame, the additional length ereeted, and t':� same wall can then be reused. He said the buildings come complete from the factory. Mr. Crowder asked what the area of the land is and what percentage will be used for the building. Mr. Olson said their total building will be built in three stages. The building they are proposing now will have 48,000 square feet with the two future stages having a total af approximately 52,000 square feet. He said they will be slightly under the 40 percent maximum coverage with the total building. Mr. Crowder ask�d if there will be a problem with the parking for the total building. ^ Mr. Mattson said there will be no prohlems with the first stage of construction. Mr. Olson added that the use for the second a�d third stages of construction is not definite as yet and the use would determine the parking space��needed. He said he believed that the Building Standards committee wauld have to approve the future construction plus the additional parking necessary. Mr. Crowder asked if the exit from this building would be onto Mississippi Street. Mr. Olson answered that Mississippi will be the only access to the property. Chairman Drigans asked how many people would be employeed at this building. Mr. Olson said initially they are planning on 50 employees; 34 during the day shift and 16 at night. He said eventually, when the total building is constructed, they may have 165 employees with 80 to 85 on each shift. He added that he was onl.y guessing at these figures. Mr. Crowder asked if all the loading, unloading, and parking would be on the east side of the building. Mr. Olson answered that it would be. Mrs. Wahlberg asked when they planned on startinq construetion. Mr. Olson said he hoped in the spring, but it would depend on financing. He added it would then take approximately 6 months to complete and they hoped to be in the building by fall. Mr. Olson said they-are now in the process of closing the deal on the land and when it is complete, the existing farm buildings will be torn down. Mr. Bob Brazil, 731-68th Avenue N.E., said he has worked for this company for many /� years and there couldn't be nicer people to work for. He said this company employs several families from Fridley and that is why they decided to locate in Fridley. -,�� . �� The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee Meeting of January 28, 1975 Page 3 MOTION by Gabel, seconded by Crowder, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. � Mrs. Wahlberg asked if th�re would be any problem with the drainage going down the road. Mr. Mattson said this was specifically asked for by the Gity. Mr. Mattson also noted that-the loading on the east would constitute side yard loading but they have shown adequate berming to take care of this. Mr. Crowder stated he is very glad something is going to,be done with this property. He added this building looks very nice and he can't see where the variance would create any problems. He said there would be no extra traffic generated on the street past the residential property, and since Mississippi Street is to be improved, the traffic qoing into this business should not create any problems. Mrs. Wahlberg noted also that there were no objections from the surrounding property owners. MOTION by Gabe1, seconded by Wahlberg, to recommend to Council, approval of the front yard variance, contingent upon the'legal opinion in reference to and a.��proval of the rezoning before the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote, there being n-a nays, the motion carried. 2. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF• SECTION 205.134, 4C, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 25 FEET TO 7.5 FEET, AND, SECTTON 205.135, 1F, 4A, TO REDUCE THE DISTANCE THE DRIVEWAY IS FROM A LOT LINE FROM 5 FEET TO ZERO FEET, AI�iD, SECTION 205.135, l, E4, T0 REDUCE THE DISTANCE OFF-STREET PARKING IS AWAY FROM THE MAIY1 BUILDING FROM 5 FEET TO ZERO FEET, AND SECTION 205.134, 4, B2, TO REDUCE ^THE SIDE YARD SETBACK ABUTTIPIG A SIDE STREET FROM THE REQUIRED 35 FEET TO 33 FEET, ALL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ON LOTS 16, 17 AND 18, BLOCK 8, ONAWAY ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7791 ELM STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA (REQUEST BY PACO, INCORPORATED� 5920 KIRKWOQD LANE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.) Mr. Steven Sprangler, representing Paco, Incorporated, was present to present the request. MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Crowder, to waive reading the public hearing noti.ce. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried, Chairman Drigans stated this property had been before the Board on November 12, 1974, and also before Building Standards on November 21, 1974. Chairman Drigans read the minutes of these meetings and also the City Council minutes concerning the above two meetings. � Mrs. Wahlberg asked if this new plan has been before Building 5tandards. Mr. Mattson answered that it was before Building Standards on January 23, 1975. He added the plot plan has the markings on it from that meeti.ng. Chairman Drigans stated this proposal is for the use of three lots, whereas the last proposal was for two, and the building has been turned around so that instead of a zero side yard setback for the building, they are now asking for a zero side yard setback for a driveway. The variance locations were pointed out on the plot plan. � The variance for the driveway to have a zero setback was discussed: Mro Crowder asked if there was a house to the south,on Lot 19. �'• �ttson said that there was but that the land the house was on was zoned industrial. Chairman Drigans said if this variance was denied, the driveway would have to be reduced to 15 feet and the parking stalls slanted more, .��, ,. The Minutes of the Board of A�peals Subcommittee Meeting of January 28, 1975 Page �A _ � Mr. Crowder added that the semi drivers will have to back into the parking area and if there is a 5 foot green area, they wi11 probably drive over it, especially in the winter time. Mrs. Walberg asked about the snow removal from the parking area; would n it be pushed onto somebody elses property. Mr. �rowder asked what the ratio was of the building to the land area. It was figured out to be under 40 percent. Mr. Plemel stated that this building is bigger than the first proposal but there is one more lot, so they shouldn't need to ask for a zero variance on the driveway. Chairman Drigans said his concern was that there is no agreement with the adjoining property owner for the zero setback or the snow removal. Mr. Mattson stated that Mr. Paschke of Paco, Inc. had indicated that he wanted to � pick up the lots to the south of this property for another huilding site and then combine the parking for both buildings. Chairman Drigans stated that Mr. Paschke might be able to buy them but then someone else might buy them too. The Board can't make it's decision on only a possibility. Mr. 5prangler said that the garage for the dwelling to the south is located toward the adjacent lot line. The side yard variance from 35 feet to 33 feet was then discussed. Mr. Crowder said because of this being a corner 1ot, they get caught with a 35 foot setback on both sides. He asked what the driveway on this side (78th Avenue) of the building was for. Mr. Sprangler said this was for a drive-in door. Mr. Crowder asked if it will be used by semis. Mr. Sprangler said it would be used mostly by ^.vans to drive into the building. • Chairman Drigans asked if this was a speculative building. Mr. Sprangler said that it is being listed through Thorpe so they might have a buyer for it. Mrs. Wahlberg asked if the building was moved 5 feet closer to 78th Avenue, and eliminating the 5 foot variance on the south, would this create any problems with the aesthetics of the area. The Board then looked at the aerial map of this area and also the Onaway area site plan. Chairman Drigans noted that the setbacks of the buildings from 78th Avenue are not all uniform so to move this building closer to 78th Avenue would not create any special problem. A discussion on the variance for the off-street parking next to the main building brought out that Building Standards had stipulated a bumper rail be mounted on the �building if the Board approved this variance. Chairman Drigans noted that this variance along with the bumper s�ipulation has been:approved for quite a few of the buildings constructed in this area: The varianc� for the rear yard was discussed. Mr. Crowder said he was more concerned with the rear yard variance than the others. He said the Harris building, adjacent to the rear yard, had some problems with the utility poles in the easement. The Board was shown the Harris building plot plan. Chairman Drigans stated that according to the plot plan, the Harris building has an 8 foot rear yard which would leave 15� feet between the two buildings if this variance was approved. He added that the buildings would be relatively close. � Mr. Crowder said he would be willing to grant the same rear yard variance on this property as was granted on the Harris property. � _*� The Minutes of the Board of A�peals Subcommittee Mseting of January 28, 1975 Page 5 Mr. Crowder said he would like to get Mr. Paschke's reaction to maving the building �'� 5 feet farther north. He said this would mean denying the side yard setback for the driveway from 5 feet to zero feet and increasing the side yard setback from 78th Avenue from 35 feet to 28 feet. Mr.'Sprangler said he was sure Mr. Paschke'would ^ agree to this. Chairman Drigans said this would also allow for snow removal. Mr. Plemel said he favors neither variance and feels the building should be � shortened. Mr. Mattson said the normal driveway length is 25 feet, and in this case, if the building was moved, the driveway would still be 28 feet. Chairman Drigans added there is also a 15 foot boulevard before the street so it would not create any visibility problems. MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Gabel, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. Chairman Drigans said he favored moving this building farther north as the adjacent progerties are not in line,and with the boulevard it would still be 43 feet from the street. He said by moving it ahead, it would also allow more flexibility in the back for the semis and snow removal. He also favored moving it as Paco does not own the adjacent land and because they do not have an agreement for the snow removal or the zero side yard with the property owner. Mr. Crowder said he also felt the driveway variance should be denied and �he side yard variance approved, with the understanding that if the applicant won't cut the building down by 5 feet, that the Board would consider granting the side yard variance from 35 feet to 28 feet. ^ MOTION by P1emel, seconded by Crowder, to recommend to the City Council, approval af the rear yard variance from 25 feet to 7.5 feet, and, denial of the variance to reduce the distanee the driveway is from the lot line from 5 feet to zero feet, and, approval of the variance to reduce the distance off street parking is away from the main building from 5 feet to zero feet with the stipulation of a bumper rail to be installed on the building, and, approval of the variance to reduce the side yard'abutting a side street from 35 feet to 33 feet, with a maximuri variance down to 28 feet if the building is moved 5 feet farther north. Upon a voice vote, ' there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMEi1T : The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Drigans at 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � MARY HINT Secretary � i � ^ , /'1 OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION �� TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERNt 'Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on January 22, 1975 in'the Council Chamber at 8:00 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a rezoning request, ZOA #?4-A5, by RAt� Manufacturing Company, to rezone fram C-2S (general shopping areas) � to M-1 (light industrial areas), Lots 3 through 15, garts o� lots 2, 16, 27 through 32, all in Block 9; vacated alleys in Block 9; and the east half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to said Block 9, all being in Lowell Addition to Fridley Park,•lying "- westerly of the West line of the plat of 5�rlvan Hills Plat 6 and lying northerly of tlie North line of the plat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, all lying in the South Half of Section 14, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located between Main Street and Second Street N.E., South of Mississippi Street N.E. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above � matter may be heard at this time. Publish: January 8, 1975 January 15, 1975 EDWARD J. FITZPATRICK CHAIRMAN - PLANNING COMMISSION CI'fY OF 1�ftlUl.}iY h1INNESUTA �` �„PI.ANNII�G A�?) Z0�lI�;� FOl2A1 � NU�tI�CR �%`��u� A!'PLIC�113'f'S SIGtiA7'L'RI: RAO Manafacturing Comparry_ Adclress 2010 North l�th Street Mpls.. Minn. Telcrhonc Nunbcr �22-33111� PROPER'I'Y ()ir `E12' S SI GNATURIi �Q Manufacturi�� Canc��t�yy Address 2010 North �h�reet M�ls_i wn_ Telephonc N�,mber 522-�3liZ �Strcet Location of Nroperty 20Q Mississippi St. N.E. �� F ,.,,+� - TYPE OF RL'QUEST 7C RezOning Special Use Permit Approval of t'remin- inary � Fina1 Plat Streets or Alley Vacations Other Fee J� —Receipt No.%"{-�� Legal Descr. i.��tion of Property attach.ed Preseirt �onin� Cl�zssification �_2� E.risting Use of. Property Vaeant wf vaeant farm buildings�to be removed� Acrcage of Property 2.21t Dcscribe briefiy the proposed zoning classificatiasi ar type of usc and improvement proposed M-�. Li�ht Industrial to.�e oartial v-_ used for manufacturin� alon� with prop,ert�,adjac_ent to�h?s present'1,�r �oned M_� - � Flas the ��resent applicatit previousl�� sought to rezonc, plat, obtain a lot split or variancc or special use permit on the subject site or part of ii:? yes R no. tiVliat was requcsted and when? Thc uneiersi�ned undcrstands that: (a) a list of all residents and owners o� praperty witi�in �00 fcer. (a5� fcet f�r rezonir.gl must bc att:zched to this application. (b) Tliis applicatioli miast be signe�i by all o«ncrs of the property, or �n explanation �iven ��hS' this is not the case. (cl ResponsibiYi.ty for any defect in the procecdings rest,lti»fi trom the failurc to li:st ti�e names and ac:dresses of all residcnts anci gi•operty oHners of praperty in qucstion, t�elan�s to the �m�lcrsigiiea. A sketch of j�ro�osed pra}���rt�� r�nd structurc must he dre:wn and 3ttached, showin� the follo�cin�;: 1. l�orth i�iT•c�:tion. 2, l.ocation of proi�oscd structurc on thc lot. J. L�1If1�Rti1011S Of �lO�Cl•ty, i�ro��oscd struct-urc, an1 front and side seti�acks. A. Strcct !�amcs. 5. Loc��tioit and usc of �cljacent cx.istin� t�uilclin�;s (wittii.ii 30Q fcet). '11�e iin�larsis;necf hcrcby cicclares rh::t a.Il thc facts and rei�rescntations stated in Lhis arplic:�tion arc treze ;ind coi•i•ect. pATE 12-20-7l� _Si(�'VA'CUItE RAO Manufacturin� Com,�anx--`� ��(,i'�Z��r-- (AI'i'I,1C���v7'j by Robert A, Olsen, Chairinan of Eoard ^ Uate Fi7ed� Qatc o£ ticarin�� I'l:umin}; Commissicm IIi�I�ro�rccl City Cou�:cil �/tppr�ved (�lates) lleniccl (cl�ites) i)cnicu '�,,,,,�.� , • , r �1 ^ RAO MANUk'ACTURING CCMPANY '?,� Legal Description oP property to be rezoned , Lots 3 through 15, part of lots 2, 16� 27 through 32, all in Black 9; vacated alleys in Block 9; and the east half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to said Block 9, all being in Lowell Addition to F`ridley Park, Anoka County� Minnesota.lying westerly of the West line of the plat of Sylvan Hi11s PZat 6 and lying �, � J5,! northerly of the Plorth line of the plat of Sylvan Hills P1at $. �� LAI1D SIZEs 271.65 ft. East-�:est, 359.9�t ft, North-South 97,77?.70 sq. Ft, 2.22� Acres - P��'� � �. ;� � ; i i Liat of property owners xithin 350 ft. of property to be rezoned. �'� and 200 ft. of property for variance. Planning Commission January 7, 1975 Anaka County Counci 1 ^ MAILING L•IST ZOA #74-05 �ditto- RAO Manufacturing Co. Lynn D. & Christine L. Hansen Ra1ph W. & Jar�yce L. Messer• 6530 2nd. St. N.�. 11}� Satellite Lane � F'rs.aiey � ��aieyr, r�. 55432 Zl�rin City Federal Aif R. & Dorothy M. Lee 801 Marquette Ave. 130 Satellite Lane Mpls.� Mn. 551�2o Fridley, Mn�. 55432 Wa2ter H. Sinner Robert F. & Patrieia M. StroM � ltll27 Monroe N.E. lt�i� Satellite Lane Mpls.'� Mn. 55421 Fridley� N:n. 55�t32 R3chard J. Trezona 17? Hartman Circle Friaigy, r�n. 55i�32 i Caroll C. Groth j 20I Mississippi St. ; Fridley, Mn. 55lt22 ; � Project No bl Corp. ' i10 Times Bldg. r�tP1s., Mn. 55401 r''"� Raymoncl J . Brink 653b Main St. N.E. ; Fridley, Mn. 551�3�� -ditta- -ditto- -ditto- Nick J, Dovolis 381� Wash�urn Ave. S. . Mpls., Mn. 55lt10 Isonazd E. & Jen�ie Swanson } 6�01 Main St. j Fridley� N�.n. 55�t32 - ; ' Gary R. & Jill B. Marlow 6525 Ma�n St. � F`ridley, �tn. 55�32 , 1 : i Carlson- Lavine Inc. 1 2831 Aldrich Ave. S. Mpla., Mn. 55lt08 � -ditto- -ditto- - ditto- -ditto- ..ditto- Nick Dennis Jr. 1lt0 29th Ave. N.E. Mpls., r�n. 55�18 Donald E. & Maxy J. Kiefe 201 Satellite Lane . Fridley, Mn. 55�32 Rice �'laza 110 �'imes Eldg. Mpls. � Mn. � 55401 -ditto- Edstrom Realty bt� East 2nd St. Winana, Mn. 55987 -ditto- RAO Manufacturing Co. 2010 North 4th Street Minneapolis, Mn 55405 r... Y � � . . r� � . .. ab.i � � . . � � • � 0. � � � y : ,,,)i � � .. . �. � w,�• 1 .\ ! k.I . .s � . ♦ � ;, 'n . w • q��'� . � � f . �. . ! i ` _ .:%y�-._ r // � '� • , , � .. �, /t/�� �i� e �Jf'►r���M y� � ��' �� ♦ °Y � � 3lr�.�w �'?' . �' t;...e�,,,� �. • Ma �,_' ,� , `t � � � � R... / • • � . n 1 ' a � � /� \ '• = + . .� �, , i i . � "T'►�'� i�i7. 1 Ir ii�l �'� „ �� � � � ' � Of u /:� \ q +f�'�i� r% 1 • $: f {,� « /O �� ?a.. .. S� •' �� A ;..0 ..v SO �:•'± i ZJ L i'�s 1 • � . � . � `�i � � e... .�. � � r . .�\� ,r . �. k� , 7 �� , ,� � � � � L�� �._ .!If.,a �ve.,�, �J�7S y ��6• . waqe ��:.^f , �,. •G�� �`. �� � � . 'oin�,I ��{,`t'i,iiir'i: "� �'' " .. . � � �� J/►•fC�v � U7� ' � � � � �• ' 1� .i)f ������+• -5 ,�'�� ��, ^ � Q " �.tJ ` ` ••s;,-'��� • t� e 60 .•..,�. ., - ,�.,.,f'f...���'ri r, � ,e � fi a � . • UJ 3' 1" ,%^ � :,- '� I{' t o 6 q o. >� �•` . �..: . ;: . . . . , j:._... �� � /+:.,s. _ � �; ��•• �'" ��. ; . �� � ,1.:� Q = �% '�c �� ; , rA • - . � . � �y{ r��A..Jj�'�',�-�.T,.�,;.. " :: , � `�: � J . '^:1 . �'I'� . �; L�}"^' 7 Q—�� : C � � s, ��. t 1 t i t% f� � : {� ' . 1 � �G►%� :y 3G� �:a / w —� �.. w .s 'c S9.�a � E.qt� � � . • . . . � ! � . e. •;i.:v' � ` ` �y S{l.it l�e�o � � . +. 1 � ����.i . . /� �^ `� . . Lir ` . ' � � ~ '.� � . . j • � , �� Z M � � o•��. . . . � _ .,rc_ � �' .. ! • . �� OA #74-05 RRO MFG. C0. ses�sew� .-. 'o v�r�or¢ � � ",� � ' A' t .' ; . . . �� � � � i 1 id!?� . ., �"+ �e � ;r . � . I .. ` . „�� � . ;� �. ^ »s��.• . o �2 1•00� . � � �j � . � s.��y�� - ~ � , �,--"�f5"•-+`� �^�"" ` y �J �'' �B I� ' � ; �4s4/�/ ' j a� � —i l �GIJ"% � »�.., w - /� �''' : i i � � t� ,/ ' , � i :k'` ' �`t . . a ^ �r /.>r � � � � : ,� � I � fi � � "'t' ' `" ' � � „p ` i � °23 i.f.� n /U � ' � i•� r-�++93 . f � � �� . � - � . �� . •!o{S c fl��' {\� � �YO os• �� � . � . � . . , l J '' � � �� � T ! � ` ti �' . // � � � � �3e 1Cd. w1 • ..1� GG+"�SL�c � II�f �•. Y� . y /` M . `\ . . .. . . . � ; �n r: I :�� "�f f-, � ,��, r �;. �� ( ;,L� -�' �° �—,� � `• / . {j a �n5 ' . . . . � }� a � ' . +• . /. �K� A � .. 1 K �K ., cl ' 19 ' !6� J5 !f i_ '�,:. :`r� /, q�> � . . . . . 4 � . � � .. • � iG 1� ie • (% '+ � '�'�fi • H ' . �30 �rt9�!!�� � d , i �.�C ��.�, 60 ,0..� � �. • � � �f.�v,v. �.. .�. � � . �.e ' . . . • . . , , . .. � f , 1 ....������7.�4/ �• -._...� • _" T . . ' . � ._.� ._' 1 . " . _ ._ . _. •i ^. _.. .. � _ . 9d2.7i. Wp_�OJ-_ - � �,� - -rr . �s � � i � - � a - . . � .�. w � - liil.Y_"._ . i�f _' ~:.. � _ I� 1 .: Sy.r.e... ,� - : �'�Yr���r��rr : - � --- s,�1 : ..� � --,.�,��.,'��n�u.�r�nr���L � «_: :. . r �: . �. i R � i � , . t� � ,' ' = � . • r:, , ,�s+3 7 G 59.3 Z/�._< � �M��I�i�; �r;s�_',= : � : . ,, s, . .., ` .: ' , � . � { � . ..S p :�. � ' ' --•---•:.=.�.�..�.. � - � � r, � � i - i f i. - I l : Q n - �' . ; r- , .,, 4 ,,._ i. :�.._.T. -•-. � �1 i^ � n., sd r .3' -"' . 1 f ; "'_` - _ • ��: , .;J, �� *�,., , ,: ;, �, ,' iL � (,. �;� /� � � �_`,,,t"'� �z ��'' �" ;r •.( 3, �. : � , o � l�x`T'a'�-i.l. � `�L"- . ° i . j i '__' p .� �r � a . { . . . _ . � j . . � . . � ( 1 ;� � i Ct�-.-�� ,�i��- EJ i� .i�' = �J * � ' � . � L ► � - � i � � -•:,� � � ._ �: � $ � 1 S . f _ �j �. 1: : ° � . �., .� �,I ,II �«- "'"'� . _ ' � I ' " I• i ' �s ' 1 r.! + .+ � ri . -� ' 1'' ° � � � } - , _....'`a ` - �_ � � ` =* .: . v � ,., . �� _ . "--�.-, - - a ',� � .� . .. � � �. � . . � �: � /o �"�� ,�'7 :.i . ` • � � �" - �����/� U�� , c., �� � � tl. — T-�- �� � . ' � ��jy���IjS,�:; � � � /it� � • `} �i t ,� ; , ��� , Yn t.. r ! �' � b F'• ^�'` ZS�. �1 / �� �� ��� a J.29+ i .ee, - - .. . � . !�) . � -�. 1. ..! �`- - � �-�'� I -�- ` �'- - - . . fs,e �j . . nY __, {;. ' ,•' • \ 7 �' . ! � .!Q!'i:'! �: �—� ~�• ...� � � L. � ti ��� � v ♦ t �! � � _ ... _ � � � r f ' '^ ,- z4 -- ; z.a /-� 1� n! T �► :. .�U} ; 3 '� ; { �a =0 1' ' � � Y , � }'T � � . 1� a � � r� ` . 1J �.!!.� , �;; ; �%.. so/ �\,�� y �� J�� i? ••�'°:'r;; .r� .� ,s�ae � -s+.r.� ''+-n -. ti. : .. � �.� �vf.if _ � ��. ' - , yJlv:�_, _�.-�a. :.�. J:r):.+ � .., Y t wf j� ` J.,,y` . i�.I�L! - _,.�. .�' � C,�i �� L.1 � �::. "��` �'`�.- i J , ^ � -, :: • w ,,, . , � ,I '�� r {: �;. ", C ; „ ., ' ` �r ,.: �, ..,•., ,.. :,s„ . � � !�� � �' d� _ s: .1 ' .• '� .'°f,�. ..I..♦ s.A. � � .s..LKN � � `f ' �� - L ,.!�„� � • _ '5����✓'j J��:. .r. (0 �+'a `a' 1� �,�sl" �"� � � �. r Z � �� +' � + j �`y � � .l w�� �/r r/ r if' ,,;� C- :♦ ,j . �/ � 9 � � s �� ! � t � y \ � . � � I!1 � . . . � �� ' ��,7 t .,1�.,,.. J .•• � ,� �,.. . ' .' }. J' � I ,� •• - ` � . ` . � �,�� �` ��I C � �.f�uJ� � ' `� � �S'!'. /: '� , �:� I v� i -v.. � ? �'� ��'s � _ _� �., t.• �,�-- .+� �i ' � . � � , � � � ' ,,,,,i � ' °� ��+�° y � . � '' .�� / +- �} ----1'•�.._ �. -.�,�.* .,* -� � ` _ J �� � �,`« • '� �� ^,; � g "�s � �Q � � � ��� . 1 Y . ,� '� �� •j �- �; I/ ..1 /C w. �T� i ' � �^ •' �' '� . 7 �j , � � � . ,,; � d I: � ; � . j �� � ! .� � . �jZ`; ' / + .. �,. �t�... : �) � �. �1�� "�i�" - � ! '�'�• .Y� �. ±' ! i! 1 � • s. �� y � -�� �' :b� t •• � . . ;�Z � �� ,l91 �.�'.• � c�,J 1/ r 1•�,�� o . . '� ;: -t+�`.7 6� �� : ' ,'��1�V:J�.1:Y�-.. ���� ,` '� ,:,� � i �7 1 �� .�/��� • �IY v LAyE � � � � ��y • •f� / .. ,. � .. �. , =�- , . • � , ,, ti- r .0 : �r ... ' :. te.� � `' ` . i�� I �.,` ' .!�• ' � t� • �``',` � �/. f i v � 1 . "� . \ ' � . �•` �' ���' . � Y y � � �1 '� r 'y , . ,�� , �/\ .:��• �� s' :�, q � �-�..:._� � � t :i a 1 .r� � ' •'/ :' ; t� . • �.• . � � ( �. . ' �;� � . . . '�- . , ; . . a.! � � � � i .� �' 1 ..� i . � f'�,�' f�_ . � � �( � � ' i' fr � /- � 'e. �'�' ' �� + , •' � �, + , � / � ,� -. y � �. ,, j �;�; ��" � �� c ;: '� /,�..a' �Si.�� .,. j .v ^ ,, � I ' e ' 9 � � !� • 1 ,�'' e r -{� �.� . r : � i�, �. . . � ' � _ �.�+` �j� - � :.. f�o � :. ti lI ; ! 1 ;J • .�, , �•.. ', i1 _.If�r ��� a ���r:� � �' � � : �,x � ,. . '0 �S. . _ `+� "'• ..» .�. , ..e � �f�� r. -° -'---�;.......- .�.�__---�' ':-' , �,i �� � , �^. � t, ' t� y ' '���'t� ..H " I'. � , ' ... .. ; • . _ . • . ',0_I � . �� ;�.1 `. r . •'•�� . : . . . . � ..�—.�-�.�..- ' x . ' � .+, - .�`�.• i, ( �j �, • r -�' •�.t�--'•. . � ... �� `,�. ._+ ._--• .."__..�—_ �,' �2 ..,. n'✓, • y•►; . . ,���"'�'_� , ` . . _iY . . , . . . � .� � ,� - .----�_ � , ; - � �' � , + .. __. �,. � , � ' _ �' ��� '- - ' ; ^� . , � ' � ,.:.•-,_ ____-� ,... :,�.:; -. � ZOA #74-05 . . . . �. _ _-�. r. ~+� .;�...:t f: :. . . ._ ... � • � \�-. ��' � .._...... , , RAO Mf g Company . • , . .-'_" . .. . ' � . , �' . _ : .' � - � , • • -- :. . _. . � �• .+. , ; � . . . ; , �- , .. ; � ,i , , , - ' . '"� � `j ' + �.� ; ;. � � � ,.. � =��...--� � ' ;, .. t ' f ��; � �t � - . . / ••�%. : . . ,, f e �' � �_ .-^ �- . , ;� tF• M! j t � ,� 4. � . '� - — , .r . ►� �f �R a ;:1 . . � . . • ' ' . . • ' . . . . , r ' . . �R-�'�' I • . • �,�� . - .... . . . . . , . I . . . . . ' . . . " , �l�.� . . . . . � � ) ��.... � ., "� ^ . . . �. . I �. . �.,1• ' . _ . , 1 _ . ... ; .. i . � . . . . . . - . � . � ✓ .. .. .. . . . . �it + - . . t.. . � � o► ---i �' I • .� � � r • n i Z i . : ' � � . ` . • � � ' (O ]�. � r��1) V ` _, t � � , ' . �L. � I � 1s' �:.�G: - : .� + w r� - _ Y -- _ _ -T- ,'� _ _ _ _ .._... , - - � � . _ , .+-_ ' _ ,; . . _ — -- —_ � . �� a - - ,�. :., _ . - — :- �. g .� -� .:� . — ——- �� � � , . _: , � . . � , , `: � � � ' 3. } . � � � . i o . L.�; . r � y� � � . � . +. : , . � . ._ _..L. � �_ . � _: ? �y � �., . � � � .. �$' � '�` _ _ r "._ .�n p . . � 1 I h , � . ', ' � � � i i. : . , . .. i • � �� .. � J. 't � . �'Z'' . �� ��` �` � � I � i ) .. . ..' . . . •..�i F . � � ! .. . ' � ��..' (-• ' 1 . + ' � ' �� � Y '• . . . • 1� .. . + � � .-' . � \ � i,� ,` .. � '1 +. � ., 1'. . '. � ^ i . . i, i � , ` �' ']- �``�=� W , � ► � , ,� � . � � � � � � : � ��� . i , �. � �, � ''� ' ,� � - � � �-. . � ��: �. � � �� . '� � . � � � +q i 1 • � 1 � �'+� � • �� . � �l � � + � I .. . � � . �. : .�6 . : . ' , o'' � . a _ .. � i 1 � , a�•• • , t, . � r' „ ' y ,� :� � . -� �\ _ . . �� y 1 � �. �� : , ` (I ' . ' . � , . , .!` . , � ! r � .. .� ' 4_ ,+ �� , r ,j � , ` . . �,,i . � .� . .� , �.: � . . , � � f. •� . • . ,: �� :,.�' �. � � - _ . �' � � . . - - �- � '� : - - —, -�,:� l . , y • .. \ �' � . ' � ,F ! , •. • ; 1 a . � . .. � '��� ` - ~�� r� ,. ""'.'.,,� � . �. . : � . . • / r.,, .�, i'1�. . ' 1 � �R , • , •`' � . � . ~ •,i , , . �. _ , . _ ,� ..�� . t . � �• ` i;.f �� . . . . . ' ' " . • .. . , � , . � . ' . i . �� . . �, � `, _ . ,. �� .,. , 1 ,�- _ ��' 1 �ti��''�—'���� �r. � ,4 '' j.1 � , ��, s� � . `` .J ~ 4y �.M �'Y� .. . s. I ' I. � . . . . :. .. � ��+�..�` . .. ` � 1 , � e � 5 . 4 • Rtfa. �'� .� �' � �� . . , ' ,� „_ . . . , , . .� � . ,�`��„�'�;���� , .'t . . �. . � �. , ..�1+ . . . —`"'_ .. S k�a;Y�C ---..._�� , �'� � �' . � � • �� _- hy�/r1d�G+,v ' -----_..:__ � • . iji \ `, r � °--.�, — _— �•--�..� .YO1eJ'�y•��'t�� == =���yy{' .. � . '. ; ' . '. , •' f . . , , ""'�^^--�-�..� � i,� , � . � : `� ` \ . a i' . _ . , � ' . �_'�"""""'�-- � _ � ' , � . .,/`� _ �,� 3 M E T A L � � �1w+W Y � J � � �? . }'• �. ,. �� � .. � �• °,' , , � �. C R A F T S M A N � r`1 Citg o_° �'riul�y Frid�,:y, i�innaasota Gentlp��n: � , � - , � � � � `� ; � � , � January 10, 1975 Tn�� RE1�� .�T�nufacturin� Ca^�a.�f :�e���ctf'tz11y submi�� far yo�.zr c�nsl�ara�iaZ �nd ��nr�S�al a�rop��.�l for r�z�;z3.r_2, � vaMiaz�c� zn ��t'�,�c� and ap�'Lic3�i.o� .�ai bl��lctin� p��:�r.I.i to eza�l� t�i� corp�rat3.on to �aui1� a rz�zuf�:eturing facilit� in th� Ci �� of : ri�l��'. i�AQ :�an+.z�'acturin�, Com,c��ny is a �?�.ru2aa�ota corpar��3on en�axgc3 pri:���ii.3 �n t�s mar.�x.�"�a�ur3 �.� ^..tx�t�� :�;�ia�t :�� �a2 shap� � 9 � J3:L�:.n�s and s ��:n�i;�� a��am�' �,�u �. Our ��rv.; �;� 3 in�l��?e �esi�n, a:�gin��r_tn�, and t�c�3 .�i� : die making in r��ditinr. to fa�riea V��n. I�e pr��sr_�1� �T�? �y �� ��r�ans. Qur o�pr�� ;i:�n is �le�n �nd ordsrly wi yn�.n tne pl3ny az�d �F a non di. ��tz= bir_� nature wji 4�.�u� . Our opar��:�on in�rolv�� e m�� nimum amo��nt of trucit �r�i':'ic ��zd n� o�.�tsi�:a war;� ar w��rags�. '��.is cvr��:��y �ras fo�.�n�P3 �r� Oc`a�3� 2, ].9�0 and was inc:orp��a�ed u..:_�r ��� la�s o.� i�Iinnas�3aUa in 1�c?. Dur or3.�ina]. location ��.��� �n tns ���in�aapolis ?�op �� ��J� Sou�h �'a�zrth. S�trset. in 17�L wW o�i1.t a It},�?OJ aav�re ��o; p�ailt �t�t �_JO�J L�nu�1Q Av���ta� �v'c��h. ir, lqa�3 z�►s sauirzd our Qr3sc�n� 31,aU0 s�uar� fvat �aci�ity at 2010 �yort?� Fo�.��ih ��;ee�, ��inn�ap�lis. �ur prssent loc�ttion dop3 no� ps�nit �urtner e��,�;jsi��, and in ari4lci.p��:ian �i future �ro�au?� �;e sha�zle� like to relocate an s�i��able acre��e in ths Cit� o�' F`�idlay. Or. Fe�ru�r� 5, ' 1971. w° p�„c��sa� o� c�ntract �'or da�d . l�.9b �cra:� o� lind �n �h.e Citv o� Fridle;T. by'� ar� pr�sent].y in the �r�ce�s of pu.�^cha3ing an��her vtL:i� of lancl abizttir� thia prop�rt� w��.c;�? wo�.tld bri;�� ths t�ta2 acraa�a to 5.75. '�'�° total p�rce� i� bo�.znd�d on th� n��^�h b5 �fississippi Sti»et, on �h=,:� �rest ?�y ��s Burl���t�n :��M`chsrn �+�ilwaq right of way, on th� so�zt;h by a lin3 360 fae� 'fro�t �h9 northarn bo�an�sr� �nc? p���11�2 to :��, ar_d on tha ea�t �y t.e pr�p�r�ty Iine of F'ridle� Our C��rz, �iar�wa„�. ��e h�pa �a ao:,zpi�ts th1� purch�ae ar�:� s�ttl�� zh�. co:2��r�ct :�or dea� �z o��• pres�ntl,y owneci prapert� be1'ot�� J�nuaY�,; 31, 1975. . - 2010 NORTH FOURTH STREET �► MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55411 PHONE (fi12) 522-3344 � °� . ' . � ��� � . ' w e �r� ta.:�t itive�y c�l�annin� on bui3d ing a�.�, JO J��i tzt�3°a fo�� p��r.� r:it.z co.za��^czcti�:Z �a bep;� 3.ri th� ����f I`:� o�' 11'7a fitf;tS G'Ji�?�if:f;�.U?'1 Zvr.�'.,�'IiTZ i� T`4v:"_��3. �r� ai8 Z'8vLt93�..�i.'.^�o� 1`.d':A�`, s�',�'lEs $3.°.�i°'Y'1.� G(!� ��t?..?.0 U� �'i:i?3 �3i`Ql31 iJ? ac?70::8C� .`'.�i.7.Ti .ni��-:> 1�i0 �*�l.s t'.:2�? ^.^P,:382:�i- Ci�3:3i?�'�.r:�3�� O21 �O: �s':3 T'�3t Jf' �:�'1@ �?:f'77?S':.�� •�t'.v a,�L al�� requQ��Ir.�3 a vars.a�cp 3.� �a�t�acti o� tha r:ot��h �_cc:e o.f 'thi� �r���r�� �'�a� i�s .,�;,:e��� � I�JU ���� to 7�? �e�t�,. T�i� wou :u ena�le us ��o er�c � o::.r i��l L� a? ���ild3..i;� b�slc��l f:L� L�:� C�.li;9Z' OS' '��'2': y�.'OJP?"� v �nj. �f? {':_2,",�rrg � :'a�n�i�n �O t3� �;:� �L''?° k*� � �. �a� ii��, c�t2:�'cruc�;ior_,, =..c4-. wil.l ua t�'��,e t� ca+.^��xr�;na�t f:h� . 8a�"..��Lnl � J : OI^�u� �.CL ��.:.n..U?�.� �.il�D��:XTV�._�OIL `JC�i. ��..L�J. i.f�r'A�:�ik ��J-�.�i �,���C��.rw. � . SCI'i3: iVl; A,,?_, :3�I3.C.^_ W� Z�..� �J? !J_:iii.�?.ICi1k�C! C1t�I'j.�"�, ��YI;y' 1'1�.,IZ`t� t?1:�S.i131'J21 ('�h� :��s�e:�y p�::�I.��i o;' ��i� �.ar.d �ril1 Us h:��c��n .i��:t� Ti%i�n b� t�:v :[J.Qi'.��.q��^?i S�rs3t :.z.-zc33� ���s } . ��'�a bv.M� a;.:�:�, �ouic3 �� . sin�lA s�:��g, r.�a� a.�:� c-?+�an in a��,ar��rzrs� a�::� w��ald eunf'�:�rs : t� n'�.�, b�z��.:zar_g ��sa��i���.�c��s a�' t�� Ci.t�` a�." �'�*�=ziQT{. I��ae pla.r� ta �ail:� a�?a:��t t±�a� wi�� �s� a� a�s�� tu F'r?dic3y�3 5r��t� an� dsErgs��r,z3nt. . ... . �_ : . �v`e hage �ha� . aa;.� pro j�c �i�ns mee� wi•�h paut� a�proval. � . ., , . . _. . . - - _ . . � Kes���tfu�.ly s,��:�it u �:�R . . , . . _ . � r '' `� ,: _ / , ,�= '` , � .. '�.i:r.�l�(f _�,j( �.�-1, � �'` � '� . . � �.__. . . . . �ic�ard A. 01sen, Jis��—rre�3�3nL , . :, R�'10 P�a�u�'�ctu� in� C ���n�ny . , ... r � \ 0 • .; . MEMO T0: Virgil Nerrick, City Attorney ��,� ^ MEMO FROM: Uarrel C1ark, Community Development Administrator MEP�1Q DATE:� January 23, 1975 RE: M-1 Code Interpretation for RA0 Manufacturing Company The City of Fridley's Planning Commission is in the process of considering a rezoning request by RAU t�lanufacturing Company to rezone one portion o� their property from C-2S to P�-1, 4vhich would if granted, make all th�ir property one zone, M-1 (light industrial). � At the Commissicn meeting of January 22, 1975, the question arose as to whether or not the RAO P-lanufacturing Company w�ould be a permitted use in a M-1 District. The prob�(em arose when it ti�ras learned that they do nretal stamping anc4 as per City Code, Section 205.132 (Uses Excluded in M-I� E, Four�ciaries or metal fabrication nlants, appears. On the other hand, Section 205.131 �Uses Permitted in M-1) states the manufacturing of many items �hich would.require metal fabrication are al�lowed. Wauld yau please give us a writt�n opinion on whether RA0 is a-permitted use in a C�1-1 district. I have included a letter from RAO which explains the plant operation. If you need more clarification on their operation, please ca11 them. It should also be noted that they did appear before the City Council in 1971 and did receive a concept app.roval, so that might bear� on any final decision. � (minutes also included.} � . This item was continued by the Planning Commission to their meeting o�F February 5, 1y75, so your response by January 31st would be a�preciated. L CLAR Community Development Adm.inistrator DC/de ENC.: 2 � � � ,; � � � � MEMORANDUM To: Darrel Clark, Community Development Administratar From: Virgil C. Herrick, City Attorney Re: M-1 Cade Interpretation for RAO Manufacturing Company `�� Date: Januaxy 30, 1975 , I acknowledge receipt of gour memo dated Ja�uary° 23, 1975, regard�ng the abov� subject. Attached ta said memo was a letter from Richard A, fllsen, Vice President of RA0 Manufaeturing Company, and copies af cauncil minutes of January 18, 1971. In the memo you ask my opinion as to whether the proposed use of the subjeet groperCy by RA0 Manufacturing Company would �e permitted uncier the City of Fridl.ey Zoning Code peztaining to M-1 districts. You indicated in your memo that RAQ wauld do "metal stamping", Fridley City Code Section 205.132 Iists tlzose uses that are excluded in an M-I distric�r. One of the exclud�d uses is"foundries or metal fabricatio� plants". The code does not specifically refer to '"metal stamping". I presume � that metal stamping could be a type of inetal fahrication; however, it woulc3 be my opinion that all forms of inetal stamping are not to he excluded from M-1 districts. I know that cae presently have industries located on M-1 property that da engage i.n metal stamping. It would be my opinian that the gauerning sectian on this tgge Qf use would be 205.I33, entitl.ed Generai Perfarmance Standards. This section reads in part as follows: "Uses whictt because of the nature o� their opera- tion are accompanied by excessive noise, dus�, dirt, smoke, noxious gases, odor, vibration, glare, heat ar explosives shall nat be germitted. These residual features shaZl be considered as excessive in the fallowing cases:" (The section then goes on to set acceptable standards far the above matters.) This section also states that the city council may require �he owner or operator to make investigations and tests to show adherence to the perform- ance standards. I believe that the applicant should be made aware of the performance standards and that he should con�ult with the city administratian to make certain that the proposed use will meet these standards. The adminis- trative staff in reviewing the plans should pay particular attenti.on to �he amount of noise or vibration that would be expected fram this operation. Plans shauld then be devised so as to keep these items within the limi.ts permitted. I note in the minutes of the council meeting of January I8, 1971 that the applicant inquired of the city prior to buying the subject property as to whether his operation would be permitted. Representatives of the eompany discussed their business aperation with the city council and they were advised 1 � � � . . . . � . � � � . � . � � . . . . . . f�� � . . . � - . . . � . . . � � . . � . . � � . . . _2_ that said operation would be permitted on the subject property. I am certain that the applicant relied on this assurance in purchasing the property. I believe that the city should take the same positian with the applicant at this time that it took at the time of the original inquiry, i.e. that is th.at the use is permitted subjeet to the city's perfarmance standards. , ; VCH/jlh . j � . P : i I E � � � � i i�' � ',I I � I i j I i I � � ; i � �.QT SPi�IT �P�LICATI03� - "orm �5-68 • �S CI�Y OF FRIDLEY . . . . � . . . . . . . . �...�r. `v-rrtiT/ TTC�T:� (�i�Ti � _� � � � � a m r� � � � -��� ��� o � ,� �� � � i�a�o i � � � .+�' +� m c3 �°�' �� � � � � +� m +� a mo{14� � am-"� %��1�.1C:�.TI.t' S NFLLIt.' AFPLI CANT : �%'/I i✓ �• /`1//fi %� d �� — _ , , �;�` .�,�`G' ,G%� I�/'�.- �,. A �J.�.�� `I ,• ��,-�,.? I�ot Split T ..,.i ##'i� �C% ADDRESS : ��/ � � S-treet Czt�r Zip Coae ,. Aate�F�l.e�c TELEPH02�"�; , C.� � G � I'ee: ��1' �Receipt ,��'"!_,_,�3C�!c, � `'� `� ��: Council �ctio�: i}�.te Horae Business R��''+�6,RKS : PROkII�TY O��J;;Ei�( S }_ �/`,��/ �; ��/,r�.i�� /-� . . �' �� ►'�l � �'l .'�=�'/�, f�'/,��%'��f �-�-�. . � f., . ADDRESS(ES),�� „ . j� ��1,/� /� " ��r'� �= ' ----� " '�-- Strest Cit,r Zip Ccr3e �txeet �Git�r Zip Cocie T�.�xo�� �( s }��s'G �/ � �` xome Bus�.u�ss P o^°rt I.oc�.tia� cr. Str�et or Exact St�eet �.drlres� ( IF A��Y�/'l:% ��' �� ��f1-' G' •�1.�!�[:,%� - L g 1 Description o� °�:ap�rty: PaY'Ge1 "440 T. , .'�,...�,�.......�.�--.. except the Nor�h 30 feet for public utilities.& stre�t, Auditar's Sub. #108 �'� �,yd .���.�:��� v Reason for Lot Split: parc�l 44Q ParC:el.4 0 'Tis ,G h. S-= r , � °T �/��'/U'i �f. C�-1 C} �/l �f%� � L*� , � � ,� � - Onondaga. 16D0 Onondaga will be 86�'LQt 1618 93` Lot X ��7�� '���0, 'otal Area of �ropert;r _T sq. ft. �esent Zo�iing Clasai�',�catiax� R-1 i . � The underai�,med hereby dec�.areg that all the fac�e and . repxesentations sto.ted in this applicati.on are true and _ coxrect. � DAT � 5' -_7j�' SIG?dl�'ItURE `; �� .� � �j,2-.7 _ � i � B�EI,OW �'OR CITY iTS.�`r�' �0?•� {Seb '��t��re9 e�a€�� for s.ciditionai in�tr�z��ion� pI,1�TS & SUB�: Date of Conaiderrztion - � � . . Remarks: _ ^ PLAfINIIvG CO.�t�ZSSIOid: Date of Gonsidere.tion - Recu�.rke : � CITY COiI?dCIL: Date of Coneideration - _ Remaxks: ' �. �i,Z/J �J.� . / u/ �: \ . - - • � �c �../ rt. rt 7 I 6.. / ` �, � �`nt �_, z� yLyy ,.�� � E ... i; . � ��� , �.,,a � � 7 � ., �-. � E � r�2 �_. ���� sT. , : �,� ., 7t ;i z f� , � -'" . , .r L . S . #75-01 DEAN HARMON i-: � : � � �,,� ; . ', . . .. . . . ' � F .y.c~ .� �, ..1. ��'� 1 I . �r , v.� ' ��s 1 . . r• � ��aw-��.��.�.' .; '� � �, � ' ��'; 7� �O ��� . .� ' W c l . . �,.. � . � 7i`�' i ►�' . _. n .. �r . , . ,T� �• �.,� . . !►. ,� J � � ♦1 � .. �,, , y , _ ` � ��`� � . ` ; .. .� � � � � , �4• ¢ ' � I < . . R , ti i6 - 7 '` �, �`� � ' - ���=1 1 ' ,,...�•...; ;�1 � ; :•. "J9iC . 79•.�7 . I . __..__.�7.�3.FO _ ,I � )9. 9 � ! � ---2� ,- — ---- n o ..�-' + . i / n O ` -� ._ . ... � 0 5 -�.s� � , � o � � �l�G / � y � • ,s �, ,.t� � : �.3 ;, 5�6 ,, , _— �9� _ �ttS j ?" 111�' _ 29l. ".a�e„ M; � h; - - •,- �:� � � ���� � �; v ,�� \ .� � -� ; 1 � � ^ ���.�1 �� t-'�1 i5'�� - ' ' : /�i =� �L..� � '�� �Q ��:�,_ s,�' ( i 4�� . •�✓ .� � � r �b' ft ♦ � � 9' 7 ♦ �`��t* .st �.. . . � . ,ys �d ` 9Q o ' ° 1+1�,� j� s �ZO `4+ � "'�jb �`� — r� �-- ; � ' �, . , '�.( � .- �t`1 . : .. _ _ �i�. ' . � � 'Y�� /�� Fi.i r� �' � .. ` ��� A�� 7, � 7.;, $ . ' �Y � � . %(/ �/� . y (5Z M J�l._. � .._' � � j/.. '�� � ,.! � p 7�. H 3 � : � .� � �r � � j o � % - /3 :: a; � � __ �,? - -- �` �� � .� �. � �,� , 7�J� �,�� `-C-y-� Q . r ��'— --+- -i �1-- z9 t'�y J�';.'�5�� y� 57� t•. �� ���j�� l�;` � , ����'ll1J '.7Q� �/ y-i �� 7. -_�� �• ` �1.� <,r ,��i �; ^f" , • � .; _ b � l� � �� � ��� 7oV � 3` ' 37 ,' � � 1 ' N t � M•L r� � � f {� °.�. " :��, fz ;��, , a� ,�{� ��, I �'`�`�rad: " �.�`��� : ;� ��yS � I �'6� �%' Soo��j .�. •-t'c� 3��, 70; i`+ � 41a �+ rF � �J., a' rv 25'1S -, '�; c: t _..__� _^ �,_'.�^ _� +. � .T � �I�. � - �6 �ov�.�r.v'� . � � n.� � . .. _. �_ -3� 7-- /►�t�! _ •E��' o .7la 3t � 3T -=T'= ,?g ; �: H Y f� � n ti -- .. t � ,� ' b� ;: ��7y, i5gy z5 � ; ; o ,-s oe � �' � � � �= � � l�-i �N�.,� � _ ' i �s��� �r- , F,� �-.,�,�r % ,:0 A�;; � n e ''��.��` 2 �1 -3 : � ,Ij�60� ��70�; . �� k�,.�,�:� � ; � q�� _ � _ (ss) "� o��' �. _�� o ssa� Z 9a ec J� `< � i: • • '��` �fO.afe � �;. e s u ' "�1�_.�' -� w -}� r� .,/�\ ( . � .. � � . � ^� � . V . � � �. t:���I✓ �° .Z e � a��%�Z` a J� � � 1 V _-�f =�,/�? � : 7 M '� � � 1 � � p� . (�l � � � 2 �� �; -•. �L�� �� � 1� � � �j��I.Ni ��N (Spo p : �''� • � `' n "����'' ^ �4l � a � � sle t � .. 'ti'f � . . � . h�+ . . . �i�-� w°� , j . . / . �f �t _� t � � a F � ?m Q t� ' �p . �� � `_ • .:'e� �y V . V . � " fl{ //O //O :...//O : �� _ . ��71��� }� . � 31 S .1._ . . � � ,°'` �`� , :..�,�,� •�� �,� 3b � . �� �3� .�, ± �� , � i . 3,,a v 7�3���.,�� 7Fy,�6 �� �.[- w � [p'� � � � � � . . . . . . i40,� . � .'60 I$_ _. � . a 's - _� Q � ♦ � e o �i1 � �� �y�� e � �.�� � .�7 �s "'(f�� \ i` �'�Q� � �/70J 7 ,°� Y'� ( q • a � � � �o�� /J�D � °' �' �ew � 1 /oo f � � � � '1 ~ �tlttt,L'.�-•�+19 � 7 % �/ / � � �o ;;� .z.e � y g,�.-� v��f� � :� • � ,a/rinfE� ` , I 9¢ � o�' 9J _ _ : : �� ' � e /19a,�v�/C o ! � `' • 9 �� ' �6 � � / �Q� , � � �y8 . �,�,�.o.��z�,, , r �� � , �'p �,; 9 , � •», ib.; o. � ;: d '� ' ' :as�� � /�33 yoo t �' �6 � �.,, t � , �. �''� ` .� °-� o �yyf ;� i 7 � zs �� ' 6�I - 7 �� So �DD�•d�%9 � p � _ ��� j3 y�E T O N� N D A G O 1----�—gf-TV- :,�.�,`;����_� �- -- ��,. � �� ,,.o .. , ,� s,T� ,as., ;.ys �; . r�: �. :. �Yrb 1tieZ � � ��� ;16�$ Y. ��� 16�° - .,. ( . � . � � . . . � ' ,o y } .. . � . . � I. A � ,/� u 2 � o (,5so , � �C•�':� i�4SJ,� 't_"V� ` N � (S�J � LIw � �D / jIIl0,1 �I �:/sd \1� • � �• �. r' �i7 • � � A D, y3 i26 ° 28�, � y� . � t'ti` � � ` 't ��.�� _ 11Z/0J � /�, � 1 (J20.� \ J � r� 9,� : 1 � ,� :.v��. , � � v � '� �! ' � �� . � \ O � If��) n� f ' • ' �'�''� 4 � ' � 8 736�' � _ � (r/cn) y i228Q% h � �yc� � •._ .• ~• � � � 0 -_.� �{;'_�--.� �O��y v~�3ti��� �'c �� Y 4 ' �`AVE/NE. , 6E- -�S�B�. F . � ,� t : �"V y'i� ( (2aoc� (iif+o) - -"�t (FAV) r : � 4 • fii.�.•�: t.r.w �: G2•• �� • 4 { � ( det�•f "hurw�r x . , �� 9 � t = �,�,,,�,�4�, .',�e���„ ;..;'�� � �_ 73�o t ; � , ' 2? 29� ! ,��� -.�� _�_ __ tf �.� . N I0. 12 9 ,� �; .. �. �; �J�� ���o> ��f�> i S'` � � p � � : � � ; `� U l'f85') I�5 6� �.�. � i`J�9� f�1 q � �r �, �! r� ��� �Q 8� . �/� . rra . . . . .r � ' I '�... .� �'�,� /���) �/(��.5. � ��� . �