Loading...
PL 02/19/1975 - 31181�"'� � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: FEBRUARY 19, 1975 Vice Chairman Harris called�the meeting to order_�t �:00 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Harris, Members Absent: None Others Present: Darrel Lindblad, Blair, Drigans, Langenfeld �AGE 1 Clark, Community Development Administrator APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 22, 1975 ' Mr. Langenfeld said he would like the comments on page 10 clarified. He said that the basic concerns were what the Planning Commission should have, rather than him as an individual. Concern number 2 should read that if this Committee decides to tax the individual, it would be difficult to get community support. Concern number 5 should read check sources of immediate funding to see where the Bikeway Committee would stand on a Class I project. MOTION b� Drigans, seconded by Blair, that fhe Planning Commission approve their minutes of the January 22, 1975 meeting as amended. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the ntotion carried unanimousl�. RECEIVE THE JOINT MEETING OF CITIZEN BIKEWAY, PLANNING COMMISSION AND PARKS & RECREATION CUMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 7, 1975 MOTION by B1air, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the joint meeting of the Citizen Bikewa�}, P.Ianning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission of January 7, Z975. Upon a voice vote, a1I voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Drigans said he would like to discuss if�.and how priorities were established in requesting funding for various projects with Mr. Boardman at their next workshop meeting. , � Mr. Langenfeld said he thought the Citizen Bikeway Committee had done a good job and had worked very hard. Mr. Clark said they had set a goal and have kept on schedule, which was an accomplishment in itself. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 20, 1975 MOTION by BZair, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission receive the rrtinutes of the January 20, 1975 Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of January 20, Z975. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimousZy. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDAROS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 23, 1975 MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Corrurtission receive the rrr.inutes of the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee meeting of January Z3, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. �a Planning Cor�nission Meeting - February 19, 1975 Page 2 RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 28, 1975 MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee meeting of January 28, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a1I voting a�e, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #74-i7, BY GEORGE WALQUIST: To permit the construction of a building for rust proofing of automobiles, etc., per Fridley City Code, Section 205.131, (A,10�, in an M-1 zone (light industrial areas) to be located on Lot 5, of proposed plat, P.S. #74-08, Herwal Rice Creek Estates, the same being 1271 Rice Creek Road N. E. Public Hearing open. Mr. Clark said the petitioner has not responded as yet. The person who will operate this business is from out of state. He said this had been on the Planning Commission agenda for at least 60 days, so he would write to the �etitioner and tell him to respond so that action can he taken on this request, one way or the other. Mr. Drigans said the Planning Commission had requested specific informa- tian about this operation and felt that when they received this information they would still have to deliberate on this information before:a decisio� could be made. He said their original motion had been to continue this request indefinitely. Mr. Clark said that enough time has passed so that action should be taKen. MOTION by BZair, seconded by Lindblad, that the Public Hearing for the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #74-17, by George Walquist be continued until n March 5, 1975 on1� to allow the administration time to contact the petitioner. Upon a voice vote, a1Z voting aye, the motion carried unanimousZy. 2. T �nn ��n_nti to M-1, (light industrial areas), Lots 3- 15, Lots 27 - 32, and parts 2 and 16, all in Block 9; vacated alleys in Block 9, and the East Half Main.Street lying adjacent to Block 9, all being in Lowell Addition to Park, the same being 200 Mississippi Street N.E. Public Hearing closed. of Lots of vacated Fridley Mr. Robert A. Olson, and Mr. Richard A. Olson of RAO Manufacturing Company were present. Vice Chairman Narris said that although the Public Hearing was closed, if the petitioners had any questions or comments they could do sa. Mr. Clark said this request was continued until we could get a response from our City Attorney on whether this was an allowed use in M-1 zoning. Mr. Clark said he did write to the City Attorney and this letter was on page 35 in the agenda and the response from the City Attorney was on page 36 and 37. He said this response does go into some detail on the Code, but the basic response was that this would be a permitted use in a M-1 district. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planninc� Commission receive � the Ietter from RAO Manufacturing Company dated January 10, 1975, the memo from Darrel Clark to Virgil Herrick, City Attorney dated January 23, 1975, and the memo from the City Attorney dated January 30, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, �� Planning Commission Meeting - Februar.y 19,�1975 Paqe 3 the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Drigans said n an allowed use in M-1 Attorney. He said he other stipulations. � �. �, he felt that the question on whether this business was zoning has been answered to his satisfaction by the City didn't know if the Planning Commission had discussed any Mr. Clark said the stipulations had been pretty well covered by the Building Standards-Design Control and Board of Appeals Subcommittees. He said both these subcommittees had recommended approval subject to the rezoning being approved. Mr. Clark said the only stipulation that shoujd be made was that this business meet the noise transmission section of the City Code and the P.C.A. standards. He said he was sure the petitioner was aware of these standards: MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approval of the rezoning requesi, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Company, to rezone from C-2S (general shopping areas) to M-1 (light ind�strial areas), Lots 3 through 15, Luts 27 through 32, parts of Lots 2 and I6, a11 in Block 9; vacated al2eys in Block 9; and the East Ha1f of vacated Main Street Iying adjacent to B1ock 9, aZ1 being in Lowe11 Addition to Fridle� Park, the same being 200 Mississippi Street N.E. with the stipulation that RAO Manuafacturing Company meet all the noise tran�r._"- mission requirements of the Fridley City Code and the M.P.C.A. st�ndards. Upon a ro11 ca1l vote, Lindblad, Blair, Drigans, Harris aZ1 voting aye, no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Clark told the petitioner he would send them a copy of the City Attorney's memo. 3. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #75-01, DEAN HARMON: Split off the Easterly 8 feet of the North 1/3 of Lot 4, except the East 85 feet, except the West 25 feet, and except the North 30 feet for public utilities and street, Auditor's Subdivision No. 108, (Parcel 440) and add it to the East 85 feet of the North 1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 108, (Parcel 450), the �ame being 1600 and 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Dean Harmon, 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. and Mr. & Mrs. Charles , Brisbin, who are purchasing 1618 Onondaga Street N.E., were present. Mr. Clark said that Mr. Harmon dwns both parcels. When the attached garage was built at 1618 Onondaga Street an error was made and this garage infringes on the next parcel by 3 feet. This parcel is 85 feet and with the additional 8 feet the lot will be 93 feet wide. Then the garage will meet the sideyard requirement � of 5 foot. The remaining parcel will be 80 feet wide and this will meet the front yard and area requirements of the code. This lot split was an obvious thing that should be done, to place the garage on the proper lot. The administration would like one stipulation and that was to obtain a fifteen foot triangle on the Northwest corner of parcel 440 (1600 Onondaga Street N.E.) for future radius on a street that will pro�ably go in sometime on the Western boundary. Mr. Harris said that request had not been before the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcorrm�ittee. Mr. Clark said that at the time this request was made, the petitioner had a loan closing that would have prohibited the're-being time to schedule this meeting. Because of the cancellation of the February 5th Planning Commission Meeting, there would have been time, but as this was a fairly simple split, he felt that it would not be necessary to have this go to the Sub- � Plannin�Commission Meetin�c - February 19, 1975 _ �_ Page 4 Cbmmittee. � Mr. Harmon said he was selling his property at 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. and just bought the adjoining parcel so he could split off the 8 feet. Mr. Harris asked if the street on the Western boundary was improyed. Mr. Clark said it wasn't. It was part of a future street that fits in with a street pattern that would exit out to Lakeside. At the time this street would be put in, the other half of the street would be taken from Lot 32. Mr. Clark said that at the time the house and garage were built at 1618 Onondaga Street, the City r�id not require a verification survey and this was how the garage was incorrectly located in the first place. According to the application for the building permit, this garage was to be located 5 feet from the present lot line. • Mr. Harmon said he was agreeable to the dedication of the 15 foot triangle on the N�rthwest corner of what will be 1600 Onondaga Street N.E. MOTION by B1air, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission recommend to CounciZ approval of the request for a Iot.split, L.S. #75-01, by Dean Harmon, to split off the Easterly 8 feet of the North 1/3 of Lot 4, except the East 85 feet, except the West 25 feet, and except the North 30 feet for public utilities and street, Auditor's Subdivision No. 108, (Parcel 440) and add it to the East 85 feet of the North 1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No: 108,.'(Parcel 450), the same being 1600 and 1618 Onondaga Street N.E., subject to a 15 foot triangle being dedicated on the 1Vorthwest corner of Parcel 440 (1600 Onondaga Street N.E.) for future radius ,,•� on the street easement. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: MOT20N by B1air, seconded by Lindblad, that the meeting be adjourned. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Vice Chairman Harris declared the Planning Commission meeting of February 19, 1975 adjorned at 9:20 P.M. ' Respectfully submitted, Ci�G�.� iG��-e-�-✓ Dorothy v on, Secretary �� i� 1� � � .� <-� `--,z/ ��G-Z � � � �� ? �_ -� �,�../%����'�� (.��-�-G�-�:.� %�i��-Z'z.�, �.,�'� j � /� 7 � �� � ��.�.-���.�.i • ,�`"��i��' �.� � /�/� �. �,�: .� �' ..� ����%C� `��,���� %�� S �,�.�i� �eY� /'1��, >� '' __ dd,e� ,� _ G�l� e�� , ,�ir70 l�?� C , �`� � � a,,t �" ,/�,�i� v� � , ,/7i� �z - �, � �3� :f"� � � � ___ i i