Loading...
PL 02/08/1976 - 6579� CITY OF fRIDLEY AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 18, 1976 CALL TQ ORDER: ROLL CALLr AE��R�VE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY a, 1976 RECEIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMI55ION MINUTES: & RECREATION _ . . 7:30 P.M. PAGES 1 - 11 12 - 13 Y 2�. 14 - 16 RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 5, 1976 17 - 21 Request for funding from City for Fine Arts will be item 5 of tfie agenda. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 10, 1976 22 - 29 , Request Rolicy Statement on building on 40' Lots and how this would fit in the City Plan from the Planning Canmission and any nember Gommissions� who would want to respond. This will be item 8 on the agenda. 1. FOR A SPECIAL USE BY NAEGELE OUTDDOR ADVERTISING COMPANY: To allow the construc ' � tion of a 25' x 12' billboard in M-2 xonirig (heavy industrial areas), per Fridley City Code, Section 214.042, located on Parcel 5400 in the South Half of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, the same being 8000 University Avenue N.E. 30 - 32 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #76-02,33 - 38 BY PLY OOD hiINNESOTA, INC.: To allow the construction of a 10 x 30 bi lboard in M-2 zoning {heavy industrial areas), to designate the entrance to Plywood Minnesota and Wickes, to replace an existing non-conforming sign, per Fridley City Code, Section 214.042, located on Lot 9, Block 1, Great Northern Industrial Center, the same being 5301 East River Road N.E. 3• LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #76-01, BY CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER 39 - 48 CORPORATION: Split off the Easterly 120' of Parce 3190, oca� ited n the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the South Half of Section 11, to make property line consistent with present use, located North of Osborne Road and 4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #76=02, BY RONALO ENRQOTH° Split 49 - 51 off the Wester 85.0 feet o Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Creek Addition to create another building site, the same being 109 GYen Creek Road N.E. _ f Planning Commission Agenda February 18, 1976 Page 2 5. REQUEST FOR FUNDING FROM CITY FOR FINE ARTS COMMITTEE 6. PUBLIC HEARINGs HUD COMI�UN�TY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRAN� 7. RECOMMENDATION ON SECTION 8 HOUSING RESOLUTION 8. RQLIC`T STATEMENT �N 40' AND OTHER SUBSTANDARO S � � n�n n.�n �.n�� r�u-v rir ruTn Tlr rrTV nl IIM 9. RECEIVE NOTI f�IJ:i�(�] L Y '• PAGES 52 - 52 Will receive in mail before Hearing. 54 - 68 69 - 74 MATERIAL SENT SEPARATE WITH AGENDA / M� � � ' �CITY QF FRIDLEY / .PLANNING CaMMI5SI0N MEETING FEBRUARY 18, 1976 J CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Harris called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. ROLL CALL: PAGE 1 Members Present: Bergman, Harris, Langenfeld, Peterson, 5cott, Wahlberg Members Absent: None Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Pianner Ray Leek, Planning Interne W81t Starwalt, 2nd Ward Councilman Mrs. Ginny Steinmetz, league of Wanen Voters Nancy Lambert, Member of Human Resources Commission APPROVE PLANNING CQMGIISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 4, 1976 Mrs. Walhberg said the statement made by Jerrold Boardman on page 6 of these minutes should read: Mr. Boardman said that he thought that you would find that in a deteriorating cortmunity if some action was not taken, this deterioraiion would tend to continue, if not aecelerate, instead of the way it was written. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Cormnission appiove their minutes of Februarg 4, 1976 as corrected. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting age, the motion carried unanimoa�ly. RECEIYE COhMUNITY DEUELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 2Q, 1976 Mr. Bergman said he wished to make some comments on these minutes. He said ihat the content of these minutes had been previously discussed, but he wished to call attention to one pertinent item. He said this was item number three and pertained to the sign ordinance. It was recommended by Administration that a project comnittee be set up to study and make recomnendations to amend or improve the sign ordinance. It was to be set us with a member from the Community Development Cor,tmission, a member from a sign company, someone from the Chamber of Commerce, etc. He said that it was then pointed out that City administrative personnel were not assigned at project comnittee level. At that point the Comnunity Development Comnission felt that this should come to the Plannin9 Camnission for clarification consideririg that this Commission was not that familiar with what the problems were on the sign ordinartce. He said the motion was made to have staff rewrite the sign ordina�ce and then send it to the Planning Cortanission. He said the sign ordinance hadn't been directed to the Comnunity Development Comnission by the Planning Commis- sion, so there was some confusion on how this could be handled. He said that no matter how this was handled, he felt that some one from staff should be present because this would save a lot of time because they worked with this ordinance all_ the time and knew the problems that the City had in enforcing this ordinance. +�. Chairman Narris asked Mr. Boardman if it would be possible to get staff help at the project committee level. Mr. Boardman said it would have to be approved by the City Manager. Mr. Bergman said that he tfiought they would need staff guidance on any study of the sign ordinance if they were 9oing to come up with any quality recomnendations. Mr. Peterson said he agreed with Mr. Bergman��but he did get disturbed wh� � P1annTng Comnission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 2 we say that we who live in Fridley need staff to tell us what our City should be like. He said it would seem that it would be imperative to get some input from the Chamber of Commerce, and other groups who were interested in the City, moreso than Ctty Staff;;_ _ Mr. Bergman said he agreed with most of what Mr. Peterson had said, but he felt that City staff was very talented, very knowledgeable, very experienced and they wor& witfi the related problems with the sign ordinance every day. They are in an outstanding position of providing guidance and identif,jring the problem areas, and making suggestions. Mr. Peterson said he agreed canpletely. - Mr. Langenfeld said he thought the Planning Comnission and member Commissions should be able to teil staff what they didn't like about the sign ordinance and then have staff work from that input. Mr. Boardman said he thought that what Mr. Langenfeld was saying was that if staff was given a free hand in writing a new sign ordinance, they would put in their own likes and dislikes although they did try to be responsive to what the citizens wanted. but the more open citizen response was, the hetter the ordinance would be. He said it should be established as to what kind of sign control the citizens would like and what would be the purpose of sign control. Mr. Peterson said that the problem he saw with staff preparing a new sign ordinance on their own was that it was always difficult to change sanething once it was down on paper. Mr. Bergman said that if the sign ordinance was going to be sent to the Community Development Commissior he thought they were getting quite a bit of over direction. He said,it should be left to them whether they wanted this handled by a project committee� Mrs. Wahlberg said that if the Community Development Commission did set up d project committee she would appreciate it if one member of the Appeals Cortmission would 6e asked to be on this canmittee. She said the Appeals Corrmission had handled many requests for variances from the sign ordinance and felt that they could provide good input for an amended ordinance. Mr. Bergman said he felt that was a tremendous suggestion. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Langenfeld, that the PZanninq Com¢tission receive the Community Development Cormnission minutes of the January 20, 1976 meeting, and that the sign ordinance be referred to this Cormnission to handZe as theg saw fit. Mr. Scott said that if a project comnittee was formed he would like to see an ordinary citizen with no special interest asked to serve on this committee. Mr. Bergman said he was in agreement with the motion but he would like to request an addendum to the motion that would include tfie provision of City staff advssory. Mr. Langenfeld�said that the Community Development Commission would have to give purpose and direction to the project cottenittee; and at that time the staff would let t�em�kn�w if �hey were going in the right direction. Mr. Scott said every Commission already has staff, and if the Planning Comnission was going to vote to allow Community Development to have staff at the project corrnnittee le�el, then this was in violation of the ordinance. Mr. Boardman said the City Manager had the final auihority as to whether there could be staff involvement at PTanninq Comnission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 3 project committee level. 'Mr. Peterson-wi�h-the concarrence of Mr. Langenfeld WITHDREW THE MOTIDN. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by LangenfeZd,:tFtat:the Planning Commission receive the Communitg DeveZopment Commission minutes of the January 20, I976 meeting. Upon a voice vote, aI1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MOTIDN by Peterson, seconded by Scott, that the Planning Commi.ssion direct the sign ordinance to the Corrmranitg Deve2opment Commission to handZe as they see fit. Mr. Bergman said the ad�endum he had requested for staff at the project comnittee level has been rejected by the Planning Co�nission. He said he felt that staff guidance on this particular item was important. Mr. Harris said this had to start someplace. He said the first thing this Commission should do was to read the sign ordinance. Then get in touch with all the different people and organizations that had been mentioned before. Community Development can hold an informal pubiic hearing or go to a project committee, or anyway they want to go. When you decide how you want the sign ordinance to go, then sit down with staff and give them some guidance. Then staff can begin to formulate an ordinance, and when that was done it could go back to Community Development for their review, suggestions or changes. You could have another public hearing with the original people you had contacted. When you have all the recamnendations together it can cane to the Planning Commission and we can go through it again. Mr. Bergman said he would yield to that. UPON a voice vote, aI1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimouslg. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMPIISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 27, 1976 MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Scott, that the PZanning Cormr+ission receive the Parks & Recreation Correiission minates of the Janaary 27, I976 meeting. Mr, Peterson said he would like to call the Planning Comnission's attention ta the letter of resignation from Paul Brown, the Park Director. He said that the members of the Parks & Recreation Comnission were very concerned that they be involved in someway with the process of selecting a new Park Director because we are the only Coimnission that was operating a budget. and we somehow get a lot of complaints froan the citizenry when things weren't done right. Mr. Scott said he would like to comnend the Parks & Recreation Commission on the bandstand proposal. Mr. Peterson said that Mr. Henry Peterson of the 49'er's has been instructed to come before the Human Resources Commission to get input on the Fine Arts Committee. Mr. Scott said the City Charter did not provide for any input from the Parks & Recreation Coimnission on the selection of a new Park Director, but the Human Resources Corrrnission would like to support the Parks & Recreation Cortmission's feelings on this because they fett citizen input was so important. He said the Charter Cimimission should be asked to review the City Charter to provide that kind of input. He said he wasn't saying tliat staff was not capable of making a good choice, but the comm�inity benefits as a whole when you get citizen canmissions involved in these things. Mr. Harris asked what was happening on the Rice Creek-Lino Lakes regional park. _:�,A .,�.-�..�. _ . Planning Comnission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 4 Mr. Peterson said they were waiting for a proposal fran Mr. Huff and the County. We suggested that after the proposal was written that it be sent back through the various Eommissions. He-said he didn't know if the proposal had been written because he had not seen Mr. Huff. Chairman Narris said he thought it was r)diculous that a project of this kind should be delayed while the City staff and the County argued over the swapping of lands and the one's who suffered were the citizens. Mr. Peterson said he didn't know how fast this was moving, but it was moving. UPON a voice vote, alI voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 5, 1976 MOTION by Scott, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission receive the Human Resources Commission minutes of the February 5, I976 meeting. Mr. Scott said the motion on the Fine Arts Committee requestinG funds from the Planning Comnission should read through the Planning Comnission. He said the Human Resources Commission's recomnendation on the Beer Licence requirements were in these minutes and he would explain them at the time that the Planning Commission was studying this. Mr. Bergman said that at the last Planning Comnission meeting we had a proposal from a Mr. Mark Tre�enfels from the youth project committee on a youth center. He said that he got the impression from these minutes that there was some type of conflict. Mr. Scott said that when the Youth Project Committee was formed there were sane members who wanted a teen center. Their progress in solving this need was not as rapid as some people wanted it to be. Another group then suggested that they take more rapid action, which the project cortmittee agreed to, but then that youth went his merry way and never came back to the project committee. This caused a small problem because tBe Youth Project Canmittee felt they wanted to proceed vtith more caution. The other group went straight to the Council. Tney then were referred all the way back to the Human Resources Commission. Subsequently these two groups have conferred and he understood that there was a considerable amount of agreement now. They are p1anning a youth rally on March 18th in the Fridley library. Mrs. Wahlberg asked if they were sti11 looking for input from the member Commission's on the propbsal that had been presented by Mr. Trueunfels? Mr. Scott said there would be another proposal. Mrs. Wahlberg said she then wouldn't ask her comnission to spend time on this proposal. Mr. Boardman said he would suggest that they table it until they get further input from the Human Resources Go�mnission on the Youth Project Committee. UPON a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE APPEALS COhT1ISSI0N MINUTES: FEBRUARY 10, 1976 MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Peterson, that the PZanning Commission receive the Appeals Cortcnission minutes of the February 20, 1976 meeting. Mrs. Wahlberg said siie would like to call the Planning Commission attention to item No. 2 in these minutes. This was a request for many variances to 6uild'on the first 40 foot lot in Fridley. It was the feeling of the Appeals Commission Planninq Comnission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 5 that to grant these variances would have set a precedence on building on 40' 1ots within the City. The result of our discussion ended in a motion requesting an opinion from the Planning Comnission regarding building on 40' lots and this wi11 come up later in the agenda. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,�the motion carried unanimousZy. FOR A E UUTUUUK RDVEHi1S1NG GOMYANY: To allow the construction oT a zb� x lz� � oar in -2 Zoning neavy industrial areas), per Fridley City Code, Section 214.@42, located on Parcel 5400 in the South Half of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, the same being 8000 Universfiy Avenue N.E. Mr. Kraig Lofquist was present to represent Naegele Outdoor Advertising Canpany. MOTION by Scott, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing on the request for a SpeciaZ Use Permit, SP #76-OZ, by NaeqeZe Outdoor Advertising Company. Upon a voice vote, aI1 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Public Hearing open at 8:29 P.M. Mr. Boardman said that this billboard met all the requirements of the sign ordinance and was located North of the pancake house and South of the driving range, on what was presently undeveloped property. MOTION by Scott, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission receive the administrative staff report on a Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company billboard at 8000 University Avenue N.E. Upon a voice vute, aZ1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. SIGN IP:FORMATIO�a �. k{e'synt (25' ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 25' 2. ar2z (300) Meets Code (300 3. Distance Bet�veen Signs (5GQ'}_ uare feet) Exceeds 500' Sign Location: 8000 Univ. Ave. Owner: Naegele 4. S�tnuck From Street Riyht-of-way Lires (30') 30' 5. Distan�e From Street Inters�ction (50Q')__ Greater than 5�Q' " 6. Distance from R-1 Uses (500')_ Greater than 500' ^� 7• Condition Status (All Metalj_ Metal and Fluorescent � 8. Zonin9 i�-2S> M-i: M-2�-- P�_2 * Non-�onfarming to exi5ting ordinatice ** Nan-CanfOrming to zoning require;7eii`,:s � Varzance applieQ fipr� �,►-�•-�----_� �. _ _ _ _ _ _ Plannina CommisSion Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 6 Mr. Scott asked if this billboard was replacing another billboard that had been at this location. Mr. Boardman said no. Mr. Scott said he wondered how many 6illboards a cormnunity of size should have. Ne said this was the first request we have received on a billboard tfiat met all the requirements of the sign ordinance. He said he wouldn't have any problem approving this Special Use Permit for this 6iliboard if we hadn't already approved so many that did not conform to the sign ordinance. Mr. Lofiquist said that in response to Mr. Scott's question if this billboard was replacing another billboard. He said that the City Council did go along with almost everything the Planning Commission had recommended on the first requests on the existing billboards. He said the Planning Commission recommended denial of one of thebiliboards on East River Road. We then decided we would move the billboard that had been denied on East River Road to a location in Fridley that would meet all the requirements of the sign ordinance. Mr. Boardman said he wasn't sure that the billboard was denied on East River Road so that another 6illboard could be placed on UniversTty Avenue: Mrs. Wahlberg asked how many requests have come to the City for new billboards in the last year. Mr. Boardman said there were two requests on the agenda tanTght, and he thought they were the first requests in a year. Councilman Starwalt said that he happened to be an indi�idual that was in favor of some signs and not in favor of others. He said that as far as how many signs would be too many signs, there were some people in the comnunity to whom one sign would be one too many, He said that he would fully agree that in his contact with people, that there was not nearly the problem with signs that some people seem to think there may be. He said that he just didn't happen to feel that we need to thro� alt signs out. He said he was not in sympathy with those who saw all signs as a problem. Eyesore maybe, but not a big problem. Mr. Langenfeld said he thought there was a tende�cy to have one track mind when it came to 6illboards-:and to say they were all bad. He said �his sign met a71 the requirements of the sign ordinance and thought should be given to the effect on the economy and the job situation and it was a form of inedia. He thought all those things should be considered in making a decision. Mr. Scott said he wasn't against all billboards. He was against billboards that were in violation of the sign ordinance. Mr. Langenfeld said that when they considered the Special Use Permits for the other biilboards in the City they were judged on how they complied with the si9n ordinance, but he would like to go on record as saying that the sign ordinance wasn't all that good. He said the sign ordinance must be amended to eliminate all this confusion. Mr. Bergman said he would like to recognize and appreciate having a request for a Special Use Permit for a billboard that does uniquely meet all the requirements of the sign ordinance. Chairman Harris said he had wondered if any billboard could meet all the requirements of the sign ordinance, but it seems that it was possible. He asked Mr. Lofquist what the term of lease was on this billboard. Mr. Lofquist said it was a 5 year lease with a 5 year option, but it had a concellation clause which stated that if the property was de'veloped the billboard would be removed in 60 days. Planning Comnission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 7 Mr. Harris said that on the other Special Use Permits for billboards we had limited ihem to the terms of the lease. He asked Mr. Lofquist if he had any objection to a stipulation like this on this billboard. Mr. Lofquist said he had no objection to that stipulation on this particular billboard. He said they had a five year lease, but this property could be developed before the lease aas up. Mr. Boardman said this billboard did meet all the requirements of the sign ordinance and the staff had no objection to the Special Use Permit being granted with the stipu1ation that when the property was developed the billboard would be removed. He said the cancellation clause would take care of this. Mr. Harris said that if the Planning Commission recomnended approval of this request, he thought that should be a stipulation. Mr. Boardman said it was possible that this property would be rezoned prior to deve1opment, but this sign would then be grandfathered in until the property was developed, so fie didn't think that would be a big problem. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Scott, that the Planninq Cor�ission close the Public Hearing on the reguest for a Speclal Use Permit, SP #76-02, by Naege2e Outdoor Advertising Company. Upon a voice vote, a22 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Public Hearing cZosed at 8:A7 P.M. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission recormnend to the City Council approvaZ of the request for a Specia2 Use Permit, SP #76-01, by Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company, to allow the construation of a 25' x 12' bil2board in F�2 Zoning (heavy industrial areas), per Fridley City Code, Section 214.042, Iocated on Parcel 5400, in the Sovth Ha1f of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, the sa� being 8000 University Avenue Northeast, with the fo22owing stipulations: I. When this property was developed, the billboard wovld be removed. 2. This special use permit be canaelled with the termination of the Iease. Mr. Langenfeid said he was in favor of this motion but he would abstain from voting 6ecause of the position of the Environmental Quality Comnission. Upon a voice vote, Bergman, Harris, WahZberg and Peterson voting aye, Scott voting nay and Langenfeld�abstaining,.Ehe�motion carried. Mr. Scott said he voted against this motion because so many billboards had already 6een approved for this company that were in violation of the sign ordinance. He said that if this request had come to the Ptan�ing Commissio� before the other billboards he would have voted in favor of the motion. He said he had a problem with how many billboards would be allowed in our cortmunity and he would like the Council in their wisdom to give the Planning Comnission some guidance on the sign ordinance. Chairman Harris said the Cortmunity Development Comnission would be working on this ordinance. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: RE UEST fOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #76-02, BY PLYWOOD NNESOTA, INC.: To allow the construction of a 10 x 30' billboard in M-2 zon�ng k�au� ndustrial areas), to designate the entrance to Plywood Minnesota and Wickes, to replace an existing non-conforming sign, per Fridley City Code, Section 214.042, located on Lot 9, Block 1, Great Northern Industrial Center, the same being 5301 East River Road N.E. � ,. Planninq Commission Meetinq - February 18, 1976 Page S Mr. Eugene Hunt who had signed the request for Plywood Minnesota was not present but Mr. J. Antell representing GTE Sylvania was present. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission open the P�b1ic Hearing on a request for a Special Use Permit, SP #76-02, by Plywood Minnesota, Inc. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Public Hearing open at 8:52 P.M. MOTION bg LangenfeZd, seconded by Petezson, that the Planning Commission receive the administrative staff repozt for the billboard at 5301 East River Road, SP }�76-02, Plgwood Minnesota, Inc. Upon a voice vote, aII voting aye, the motion carried unanimousZy. 5P # 76-02 Sign Location O�vner: SIGN INFORMATI ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 5301 East River Road N.E. Plywood Minnesota, Inc. 1. Height �25�) 20' 0 2. Area (300) 300 s�cuare feet � 3. Distance Between 5igns (540') over 500' 4. Setback From Street Right-of-way Lines (30`)_ 50' #*5. Distance From Street Intersection (5M ') 50` _ #*6. Oistance from�R-1 Uses (5Q0'j 38�i' 7. Condition 5tatus (A11 Netal} Metai 8. Zoning (C-2S, M-1, M-2} ' M-2 � ' * Non-Confiorming to existing ordinance ** Non-Corforming to zoning requirements # Variance applied for i .~ '� � Mr. Scott said that this was another request for a non-conforming bil]board. Mrs. Wahlberg said she would like to refer the Pianning Corrrnission members back to the Appeals Comnission minutes of February 70, i976, pages 6- 8. She said that there was an administrative report included in these minutes that might answer some questions by the Planning Comnission on the non-conforming use. 5he said � � Planniog Commission Meeting February 18 1976 Page 9_ �he variance request was approved by the Appeals Commission. She said there was an existing sign at this location at the present time, which has just�Wickes furniture on the sign. This would be an upgrading of the existing sign, which would add Plywood Minnesota on to the sign. The 50' from the street intersection was where the existing sign was located. There was no building in close proximity to this sign. She said the R-1 zoned property�that this was 380' away fromtwas across East RTVer Road down by the river and there were no residences builf on this property. Chairman 6�rris asked if this wasan advertising biliboar'� or a f"ree standing identification sign? Mr. Boardman said this was an advertising billboard and had to be classified as such because it was locaied on property they did not.own. Because of a visual problem as to the entrance to Plywood and Wickes, they felt they needed an identification sign on East River Road. Mr. Boardman said that both Wickes and Plywood had signs in this area. The Plywood sign did blow down and when they were in the process of putting it back up> they were tagged by the City because this was a non-conforming sign. In subsequent meetings with the staff, this was the proposal that they had come with. He said the staff had been in contact with Buriington Northern about putting up one identification sign for the Industrial Park, but tfiey didn't want to do tfiis. As Plywood and Wickes were the only two commercial ventures in this park and did rely on the public findin9 the entrance to these properties, we felt there was a substantial hardship. He said that by not having this sign we found that several people do pass up the entrance and create a traffic hazard in trying to get back to this entrance. He said that if other cortmercial ventures moved into this industrial park, these businesses would have to be included on this sign. He said that as far as he knew, Plywood Minnesota had contacted GTE Sylvania, and they did noi wish to be included.on this sign. Mr. Peterson said that as a citizen of Fridley who travelled East River Road, he concurred wholeheartedly that this entrance to Plywood and Wickes was a traffic hazard and people had been known to do strange maneuvering when they have missed this entrance. He said he thought this sign might correct something that should never of happened in the first place. He said he couldn't see how building permits could have been issued for these businesses with this type of entrance. Mr. Langenfeld said he agreed with Mr. Peterson and he said he would consider this as a directional sign. He wondered if a sign like this would stand up well in the wind. Mr. Boardman said it would be a V shaped sign that would be 10' by 30' and the structure would have to be metal. Mrs. Wahlberg said that because they felt this was a temporary sign and would have to come down when the property was developed, they would like to have this remain a wooden sign. Mr. Boardman said it would have to be a metal sign. Mrs. Wahlberg said they consider this a temporary sign rather than a permanent sign. She said the Appeals Comnission approved the variances with two stipulations. One was that no other billboards be allowed on this property and that this billboard be removed 60 days after the property was developed. Mr. Soardman said this was also the agreement that they had with Burlington Northern on the use of that property. Mr. Scott asked if the Appeals Comnission had looked into having highway department directional signs. Mrs. Wahlberg said they didn`t. Mr. Boardman said the staff did talk to the County and they did agree to this if the entrance was located further South. Mr. Bergman said he had trouble identifying this as a billboard rather than a directional sign. Mr. Boardman said that directional signs were limited to 6 square feet. Planning Comnission Meetin - Februar 18 1976 Page 10 Mr. James Antell, of GTE Sylvania, aaid they were opposed to this sign for a'couple of reasons. One of the reasons being that it would detract from the beauty of the industrial park. Also, this plant went to a lot of expense in constructing their building and landscaping so the plant would be a credit to Fridley. He presented a picture taken from East River Road which he said sBowed that the p�esent sign blocks a view of their pTant from East River Road, and the new sign wou1d be larger, so they would be almost hidden. He said the Planning Comnission had been discussing that this sign would eliminate a trafFic hazard, but how about the people coming fran the North. If they slam on their 6rakes when they see this sign, it would still be a traffic hazard, and it would make more sense to have the County put up a small directional sign with an arrow pointing to the entrance. He felt the present proposal would distract tremendous7y from their building. Mr. Harris asked if they had a sign on their property. Mr. Antell said they had a 5' x 3' sign in the front of their building made of concrete btock. He said it wasn't quite completed. Mrs. Wahlberg asked Mr. Antell if they had any members of the general public coroing to their build3ng? Mr. Antell said they just had different truck lines coming to the warehouse area. Ne said the office had just been opened about two weeks ago. He said they did not se11 to the general public. Mr. Antell said that as far as he knew, they hadn't been approached about having their name on this sign, but they did not care to participate anyway. Chairman Harris said it was not true that no one envisioned that there would be a traffic problem 6ecause of the locatTon of the entrance on this property. The City and the County did not chose to listen to anybody.at the time this property was platted. 7hat entrance should never had been put where it is. It was the City and the County that got us into this traffic problem. There was also a sign that prohibited left hand turns from 3:30 to 5 at this intersection.which would cause difficulties with a directional sign at that intersection. He said he thought it wou7d behoove the City staff to contact the County Engineer and sit down and work out some traffic patterns for this area that would work, so that these businesses can be found and ensure the safety of the citizens of �he City. He said the entrance should have been put on the south end of the industrial park to begin with. He said he thought it was about time the City and the County began to act responsibly about this traffic problem. Mrs. Wahlberg said that when this request came to the Appeals Comnission this was called an advertising sign, it was not considered as a directional sign. Mrs. Wahlberg said that she felt she had been remiss in telling the petitioner that he did not have to be present at the Planning Commfssion meeting, but he should cane to the Council meeting. She said she thought the variance would be the only thi�g that would cane through the Planning Commission and was not aware at that time of the Public Hearing on a the Special Use Permit. She thought that was perhaps why the petitioner was not present. She said that if the Planning Commission was consider- ing a turn around action, she thought it would be better to table this item until the petitioner could be present. Chairman Harris said that if this was tabled, he would like the City Engineer's comments on what he thought would happen when this property was fully developed. He said there were 90 acres in this plat so there was room for about 30 buildings: If this intersection was bad now, what will it be then. Mr. Boardman said he thought Pianning Commission Meeting - Februarv 18, 1976 Page 11 they antici��ted signalization on the south entrance. Mr. Harris said that when all else fails, put in a stop sign. MOTION bg LangenfeZd, seconded bg Scott, that the Planning Commission cZose the Public Hearing on the reguest for a Special Use Permit, SP #76-02, by Plywood Minnesota, Inc. Upon a voice ,�ote, aZI voting aye, Chairman Harris decZared the Pub2ic Hearing ciosed at 9:23 P.M. Mt'. Bergman said he was having a problem in feeling positive about this request He thought that small County or State highway directional signs would better serve the purpose of directing people to these sites. Mr. Langenfeld said he could not feel that this was a directional sign when it did not have any kind of arrow on the sign. As far as he was concerned it was an advertising bil1board and their ottly decision was whether they wanted to approve a special use permit for.this sign or not. Mr. Peterson said that as the Appeais Commission has already had a Public Hearing on this request, he said he would like to get some direction from the Chairwoman of that Commission. Mrs. Wahlberg said that no one appeared at their meeting to speak against this request, nor were there any letters sent to the Cortmission. We acted in good faith on the advice that was given to us at that time. 7he request was for an advertising sign. The intent was that by placing an advertising sign at this location, it would help to eliminate the traffic problems that were occurr�irtg at this intersection, which both the petitioner and other members of the Appeals Commission were well aware of. Acting on good fai�h and we agreed with the arkninistrative report and approved the two variances with the two stipulations she had previously mentioned. Mr. Scott said he would not want to vote on this request without the petitioner being present. He aaid we can discuss the traffic problem in this area, but we also have to consider the merits of this billboard. Chairman Harris said that regardless of what you call this sign, it will act as a directional sign, and we are saying that this was not the proper place for a directional sign. Mrs. Wah7berg said she would like to see the petitioner given a chance to answer some of the points that have been raised at this meeting. She said she thought the petitioner should be given the opportunity to change this sign if he should so desire. She said the pe�itioner seemed to be agreeable to working with the staff and the Commissions. MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission table untiZ March 3, 2976, the request for a 5pecial Use Permit, SP #76-02, by PZywood Minnesota, Inc. Upon a voice vote, aII voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Harr9s said that in the interim, he would like to request that the City Engineer study the intersection problem and come back with some recommendations. He should get together with the County and get the problem straighened out. Mr. Boardman said he would call this to the attention of the City Engineer. Planning Comnission Meeting - February 18 1976 Paqe 12 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #76-01, BY CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER CORPORATION: Split off tBe Easterly 120' of Parcel 3190, located in the NW 1/4 0� the NW 1/4 of the South Half of Section 11, to make property line consistent with present use, located North of �sborne Road and West of Main Street. Mrs. J. Bernstein was present to represent Consolidated �ontainer Corporation. Mr. Boardman said the purpose of this lot split was to a11ow Frank`s Nursery to purchase the property they have been leasing from Consolidated Container Cor-- poration. This property was zoned M-2 and at the time it was purchased by Frank's Nursery they should come in and make a request to have this property rezoned to C-2S, the same as the balance of their property, and also have this property combined with their other property so that it wouldn't go tax forfeit. Mr. Saardman said this property was already included in the property that Frank's Nursery had obtained a Special Use Permit for in 1974. Mr. Harris asked how 1arge the balance of Parcel 3190 would be when this I20 feet was split off. Mr. Boardman said it would be about 5 acres. Mr. Boardman said that Frank's Nursery was supposed to complete the landscaping on this property this year, and he would like to see them do an outstanding job as they were in the nurser-y business. MOTION bg Scott, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission recoimnend to Council approval of the Sot spZit request, L.S. #76-OI, by Conso2idated Container ` Corporation, to split off the Easterlg 220 feet of Parcel 3090, Iocated in the NW 1/4 of the NW 2j4 of the Sovth Ha1f of Section 11, to make propertg Iine consistent with present use, Iocated North of Osborne Road and West of Main Street with the stipuZations that Frank's Nurserg, 7620 Osborne Road N.E.: I. Petition to rezone G§e�.I20' being split off of Parce2 3390.to C-2S so this propertg would be zoned the same as the balance of their property. 2. Combine this 2ot split with their other property for tax purposes. 3. Complete the landscaping on their property as agreed to in Specia2 Use Permit, SP #74-I5 by the spring of 1976. UPON a voice vote, a2Z voting aye, the motion carried ¢nanimouslg. 4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #76-02 BY RONALD ENROOTH: Split off the Westerly 5.0 eet of Lot , Block 1, Oak Cree Addition to create another buildinq site, the same being 109 Glen Creek Road N.E. Mr. Ronald Enrooth was present. Mr. Boardman said this lot was 180' by 136' so it was large enough for two building sites. He said the portion spiit off would be 85' by 136'. He said said there were two residential lots north of this property who were already hooked up to sewer, and they already had the easement for this hook up. He said there was also a 10' utility easement on the North property line of Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Creek Addition, so there would not be any additional easements necessary on this property because of the lot split. The staff has no o6jection to this lot split being granted. Mr. Boardman said the home that was on the Easterly portion of the lot would, according to the survey, have seven feet between the garage for this house and the new property 1ine. k�-,,�. Plannin� Gommission Meeting - Februar 18, 197fi Page 13 Mr. Scott asked about the sewer line in this area. Mr. Boardman said it was deep and quite wet. � MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Scott, that the Planning Commission reco�end to City Counc�I approval of the request for a 2ot sp2it, L.S. #76-02, by Ronald Enrooth, to split off the Westerly 85.0 feet of Lot I, Block Z, Oak Creek Addition P2at 2, to create another bui2ding site, the same being I09 GZen Creek Road N.E. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. �ainman Narris declared a recess at 9:50 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 70:15 P.M. Mr. Peterson was excused. 5. REQUEST FOR FUNDTNG FROM THE CITY fOR THE FINE ARTS COMMITTEE: As recommended y t e Human Resources Comnission at their meeting of Fe ruary 5, 1976. Nancy Lambert, a member of the Numan Resources Comnission, was present to explain the request. Mr. Scott read the two motions made by this Comnission at their last meeting. "Motion by Nancy Lambert, seconded by Barbara Shea, that the Fine Arts Comnittee is requesting funds through the Planning Comnission because we feel it is the responsibility of City government to foster and develop the fine arts life in the comnunity so that our citizens will be able to enjoy a richer and more fulfilling life style". (Al1 aye) "Mo�ion by Barbara Shea, seconded by Grace Lynch, that the Fine Arts Committee ask for $700 for funding from the City CoUncil through the Planning Comnission". (All aye) Nancy Lambert gave the Planning Comnission a proposed budget of the Fine Arts Comnittee which tota7ed $2800. She said this had started as a project comnittee of the Human Resources Comnission. Their ultimate goal was to have a Fine Arts Commission established in Fridley. Ms. Lambert said that at'about tfie same time that this project committee was being formed, the Corrmunity School Program was doing a survey and the establishment of a comnunity and children's threatre was one of the seven major areas of interest. She said that by November of last year, she had talked to 12 or 15 people who she knew were interested i� Fine Arts and asked if they wanted to be on such a project comnittee. She continued that she had enthusiastfic results. Jim Bruder was elected Chairman of the Fine Arts Comnittee and Ted Brockman was elected Uice Chairman. She said it was the concensus of this committee to focus in on one project which was the development of community threatre and their first production was scheduled for June 10-11, 1976 in the District Auditorium. Ms. Lambert said they did make a request from the Cortmunity 5chool Program for funding. They have a small budget of about $3500 and of this amount, they gave the Fine Arts Committee $1800, because they thought there was such a.,high of interest. She felt that by them giving them such a large share of their budget showed that there was a definite need for fine arts in the City of Fridley. Ms. Lambert said that sor� of the things that the Fine Arts Committee planned to do was to to have a concert on October 16, 1976 which would feature local musicians. There were many groups in the City of Fridley who �oi together an rehearse and practice who have no vehicle in which to display their talents. She said they planned to s�hedule exhibits of local art�ists �t-the Fridley Library. -Another area of interest was what they�called 'theatre in the pa'rks'. Tfiey have already discussed Planning Commission Meeting - February 18 7976 Page 14 with Michael 0'Bannon the idea of putting on some plays in the park program, hopefully this sur�ner. She said that Mr. 0'Bannon was enthusiastic about this proposal and hoped to get some subdizing through the County Park Program for this purpose. Tfiis would utilize the teenagers in the area. Ms. Lambert said they had already discussed ihe possibility of putting on a musical if there was enough interest in the first play. Nancy Lambert said there were many things ihey cou1d do for the City of F'rTdley.in the ma�ter of.•fine arts. We are requesting $700 in funding fran the City because we believe'it is a responsibility of the City to support local artists, as well as fostering interest in the cultural life of the City. We have a fine Parks & Recreation program, but we need to broaden our horizons. We need to provide for a more complete development of our citizens and perhaps; educate those who were not knowledgeable in the arts. Mr. Scott said that this followed his thoughts on life-long learning. He. said he had personal knowledge that this project comnittee was involving a lot of mature people in the City who have never been involved in any type of cortmunity activity. He said he thought this was a tribute to this project committee on fine arts. He said now they were talking about involving both the young and older people in this type of activity and promoting that type of harmony that was specifically addressed in the charter of the Human Resources Comnission. He said he was in favar of this request, and he said it seemed strange to him that while this request had come from a Co�nission of the City, they had received their first funding from the schoo1 board, and they had funded them quite we11. Chairman Harris said this request was for $700 from the City Council, yet the total budget figure was $2800 of which they had already received $1800 from the Comnunity School Program. He toid Ms. Lambert that this didn`t add up. Ms. Lambert said the only explanation in asking for the $700 from the City Council Was because they didn't want to request for the 1arger sum of $1,000. They felt the $300 they would stitl need could probably be raised by going to the Kiwanis, the Lions, tfie 49'er's and other service organizations, if necessary. Mr. Langenfeld asked if this budget was just to get the Fine Arts Committee started. Nancy Lambert said they had cane up with a figure of $2,250 which would be necessary to have for their first play. This was based on previous experience with such productions. She said they will charge admission for this play, but when you get money from the Community School Program, their budgeting insists that any money that comes in must go back into their program. If they made $1,000 on this play, it would have to go back into that budget. She said that more than likely this wauld be put into a fund that we could use in.succeedingyears for putting on a p1ay. We could not then use that $1,000 to put on � concert. She said the reason they became i�volved with the Comnunity School Program was that then they could make use the facilities of the District Auditorium with no charge. There will be no charge for janitorial fees, electricity costs, etc. They would also be a61e to use the props or sets that were available. They felt they could put on a quality production having these assets. She said they would like to have a concert series, and subsidize semtior citizens in areas of fine arts. She said these were uttimate goals, because they were focusing on just one area now, which was community theatre. We plan to work on one project at a time, and to do it well. Nancy Lambert said that the City of Coon Rapids has a Fine Arts Commission and their lst year budget allocation was $3,000. She said they have now been in opera��dn for three or four years, and this year their budget allocation was $30,000. She said she didn't know if they would get that much, but there were many, many cities who have Fine Arts Commissions, as part of their City government, and she felt this _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Planning Coromiss.ion Fleeting = February 18, 1976 Page 15 was an area that the City should support. She said she would not want the Planning Commission to consider this a one time request. She felt this should be an on-going thing tfiat deserved goveirrnnent support. She said that community theatre was a good project, but there were many other areas in fine arts. She said there were people working in the area of music and others working with artists. Chairman Harris asked Eouncilman Starwalt that if the Council decided to honor this request for $700 to the Fine Arts Comnittee, where would that money come from? Do we have funds available for this. Mr. Starwalt said there was a contingenc,y;fund that was available for unexpected, unknown, and unforeseen items. Mr. Harris asked if it would be possible for this contingency fund to support this request for $700. Mr. Starwalt said with the vote of the Council, anything was possible. Mr. Harris said there would be enough in the fund if the Council decided to grant this request then. Mr. Starwalt said there would be enough, many times over. Mr. Starwalt asked Ms. Lambert if she had considered making her request through the Parks & Recreation Commission? Nancy Lambert said she hadn't, but Kay Nee had been in contact with Mr. 0'Bannon about taking a flat bed truck out to the parks and having tf►e teenagers put on a show for the kids as part of the program. Nancy Lam6ert said she didn't know why they would want to go to the Parks & Recreation Commission. Mr. Starwalt said that speaking as a member of the City Council, but not for the City Council in this regard, he felt that the Council had probTems with requests such as this because the contingency fund was not a frivolous fund. He said he had a tendency to vote no on these kinds of requests. He felt that if there was a need for this, there was a logical progression, meaning through the logical development, and in this case, he meant the Park & Recreation Department. He said he didn't fee7 this was the use the contingency fund was meant for. It was meant to be used for additional funds for snow plowing, if necessary, or if any type of disaster shouTd come to Fridley. It was for dire needs that couldn't be foreseen ahead of time. Mr. Starwalt said that he hadn't given too much thought about fine arts before, but fie felt thP Parks & Recreation Department was in that business. He said'he was sure the Parks & Recreation Department did not have fine arts in their program, but he fe1t that this was where it should be, if there was a need. Mrs. Wahlberg asked if the Parks & Recreation Deparment had enough money in their budget to provide the $700 in funding that was being requested. Mr. Boardman said that Parks and Recreation usually overspent their budget, so he didn't feel there was money available for this request. Mr. Starwalt said he would have to agree that they probably did not have enough in their budget for Parks & Recreation to haridle this request at this time. Mrs. Wahlberg said then if the City Council sent this to the Parks & Recreation Comnission then what they would be doing was torpedoing the whole idea, because knowing in advance that ihey don't have the money, it would defeat the purpose to send the Fine Arts Comnittee to this Cortmission. She said she saw this as an important comnunity project, and it has gone through the Human Resources Corrmission. If Parks & Recreation doesn't have any money in the budget, then this idea was going ta die. Mr. Starwalt said his recomnendation that this should go to the Parks and Recreation Corrmission would not torpedo the Fine Arts Comnittee. He asked why these people weren't before the Parks & Recreation Commission 2, 3 or 5 years ago. Why was it now so urgeat at this time, that special arrangements had to be made. He said that if it was that important as a recreational item, then maybe a soft6a11 diamond should be cut out of the budget, and the Fine Arts projeet be put in the P}anning Commission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 16 budget. Ne said that from the Council's standpoint its a matter of how much money was available for the total services and needs of the community. Mr. Scott said that when the Planning Commission was reorganized, the Fine Arts Caimittee came out of this reorganization and we had absolute7y nothing to do with any kind of budgetory process. The idea of a Fine Arts Commission was totally unthought of. This came out of Human Resources seminars. He said that a result of these seminars, when the Human Resources Comnission started working an their goals and objectives, we identified from citizen participation, that a Fine Arts Comnittee was of viable interest to the City. This was not a Parks and Recreation fuction. This was a Fi�e Arts function. This was a completely different type of activity than recreational activities. He said that no Fine Arts Commission in the State of Minnesota was affiliated with a Parks & Recreation Comnission. We don't even feel that this should be a part of the Human Resources Coamission, but should be a Conmission by itself, with separate status. Nancy Lambert said she would vehemently oppose having the Fine Arts Comnittee as a part of the Parks and Recreation program. He said the emphasis of fine arts was to get some emphasis away from hockey programs, football programs, etc., etc. She thought the City of Fridley had a find recreational program, but it was too one sided in t6is cortmunity and we just did not have any cultural life'in Fridley. She said that she wanted to be on record as never wanting to see fine arts under_the :� auspices of the Par.ks & Recreation De}�artment, Ms. Lam6ert said she realized there was no funding area or funding program in the budget. She knew that if this request was granted, it would have to come out of some other fund,-and that this request was not coming the normal budget time. She said that the committee was formed about two months ago and the enthusiasm was just overwhelming, but if we don't get support, that enthusiasm wi11 die. You can't do anything these days without a little bit of money, and she didn't think they were asking for a whole lot. You can't keep-people enthusiastic if they can't do it. Mr. Boardman said that in answer to Mr. Starwalt's statement that this request should go throu9h the normal procedure, he felt this was the normal procedure, accord- ing to the reorganization. The Ptanning Commission had the authority to send this to the Parks & Recreation Comnission, or the Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Corrmission had the authority to act for this Commission: �Therefo"re; if..the.Planning Comnission wanted to make a recanmendation to the City Council, they could, as such. He said the City Council then had the authority to send it down to the Parks � Recreation Commission, if they so chose to do so. So this was the normal process, and the process that was established in June with the reorganization. Mr. Startwalt said he would fully agree with Mr. Boardman. He said it was almost a stalemate. Who's got the money, and who's going to jar loose. He said that whether this request would be successful or not, no one knows, but if it was not successful, he told Ms. Lambert not to give up. You`ve got to figure for years down the road. Mr. Harris said that was his original question. Did Council have money that they could spend on this request. Mr. Starwalt said yes, whether they will or nat, nobody knows. Mr. Scott asked Mr. Starwalt how much weight a Planning Commission recomnendation had at the City Council level. Mr. Starwalt said he fett that the Council gave great weight to the Planning Commission recortxnendations, but if their recornnendations got over-turned sometimes, it was not done with malice. He•said that he knew the Rjanaing Commission Meeiinq - February 18, 1976 Page l� Planning Corrmission wasn't involved in the budgetory process, but if they were, they would see how many things were torn out of the budget because there were not funds availabie for particular items. MOTION by Lanqenfeld, seconded by Bergman, that the P2anning Commission recormr+end to Council that the Fine Arts_Coimnittee receive $700 iri fanding from the City. Mr. Boardman said that one thing the comnunity was working on now was their goals and o6jectives. Hopefully when they are completed and approved by the Planning Corrrnission and the City Council, it will set levels of priorities for this type of funding. If this was a goa7 for the comnunity and it was a high priority of the community, it would 6e so funded. What we were doing now was trying to take care of an interim request by the Fine Arts Comnittee. to keep this Cortmitee alive until those priorities were established. Nancy Lambert aske d how they would decide if this was a high prioity goal or not. Mr. Scott said that all the member Commission's had worked on goals and objectives. They would, in time, be sorted out by the Planning Comnission, and that decision would be started by the Planning Comnission. He said that decision would 6e based on the merit of the need. Mr. Starwalt said that on some of these things, it was not always that the City shouid start it, but that the pseple should start it. Nancy Lambert said they were not asking the City to totally fund this Comnitee. They were not even asking for 1/3 of their funding which the Hockey program got from the City. Mr. Starwalt said he was in sympa�hy w•ith this request, but it was a matter of priorities. He said that out of every tax dollar collected in Fridley, the City got 15%, the County got 28%, and the schools got 60%. Mr. Langenfeld said this request was for funds fran the City which will revert rigfit back to the City in the form of entertainment for our citizenry. He said this would not be a total loss even if the Fine Arts Comnittee didn't succeed because�it would be a good investment just to get some of the tale�t exposed in the cortanunity. He definitely felt this should be a separat:e enti�y other than Parks & Recreation. Mr. Ray Leek said that he had been involved with a theatre group, and besides the time and effort involved, there was money spent on stage make-up, props and sets, which was done by individuals, which was just about the same as a parent buying hockey equipment for their child. There were a lot of things that went into a production of a play, other than the acting. Chairman Harris asked Mr. Starwalt what there was to do in the commun#ty except walk down to the Island of Peace for old fogies like you and me. We have got a kid-oriented society. Mrs. Wahlberg said that she felt this type of project would aaa a new dimension to the comnunity. The fact that it has just started was not anything against it> in fact she thought it was in its favor. She said she would feel very badly if the City couldn't find the money somewhere to supply the funding for the added dimension to the quality of life in Fridley. She said she knew this would have to be on a limited basis this year, but since the idea has heen conceived now, she would feel very badly if the City would not create a Fine Arts Comm�ssion. and include this in the budget process next year. It's too bad that it hasn't been here for 10 years Planning Commission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 18 alreac�y, but now that it has started, she thought the City should support something like th9s. Mr. Langenfieid said that we had studied in the Comprehensive Housing Plan that Fridley was a maturing comnuntiy. He thought a more mature community was ready to take on something like this. �r. Harris said he thought that Fridley had the finest Public Works �epartment in the State. He mentioned some of the equipment that had been bought in the last year and the amount of money that had been spen on such equipment. He said we could always find money for things 1ike that,t�t not for programs,for, p�ople. Ne said his neighbors couldn't relate to new snow plows or new warehouses to keep them in, but we seem to find money for these things. When the money was requested for something that would relate right back to the citizenry, then was when we had trouble finding the money. Mr. Starwalt said the point was well taken, but there were many things take n out of the 6udget that was requested by various departments of the City, so the City did watch how they spent the money. Mr. Startwalt said it was a matter of tax dollars. Everyone of these requests uses tax dollars, Ne said that if he could just think of the individual requests and not the total tax bill, he would vote for all these requests. He said he had to ask himself-that if this was put to a vote by the people when they knew it would 'raise'th�in:taxes; woul� they vote for it. Mr. Harris asked if the people would vote for a new du� truck? Mr. Starwalt said probably not, until the snow was�'t taken off the streets. Mr. Harris said it was a matter of priorities. Mr. Langenfeld said he felt the Fine Arts Corrmittee �ad to start sometime. He said he fully understood Mr. Starwalt's concern in trying to save taxpayers dollars. All these requests do total up. He said that in regard to this particular item, he was willing to contribute his 6 or 7 cents fran 30,000 people as a taxpayer in Fridley. Mr. Sergman said that he was in agreement with this request as something of value and worthy of consideration within the priorities of the City Council UPON R VOICE VOTE, a1I votzng age, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Harris thanked Mr. Starwalt for his comnenfs and said he understood only too well all about taxes. fi. PUBLIC HEARING: HUD COMM�NITY DEYELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Langenfeld that the PSanning Coimnission open the Public Hearing on the HUD Communitg Development Block Grant AppZication. Upon a voice vote, aIZ voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Pub2ic Hearing open at ZZ:14 P.M. Mr. Boardman said this was a preapplication for a Comnunity Qevelopment Block Grant which we have submitted to Metro Council for the 95 review process. We did run ° Planning Commission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 19 i�to a time problem with this preapplication so we did appear before the City Council and got approval to submit this preapplication before it had been approved by the Council. If there were changes in the preapplication , we can submit the changes to the Metro Council. The deadline for submitting a preapplication for review 6y the Metro Council was February l7, 1976, so at this time the Planning Comnission was looking at a preapplication that the Metro Council was also looking at. Any changes that were made in this preapplication can be made in the apPlica- tion to HUD. Mr. Boardman said the status of the Comprehensive Housing Plan and it's implementation was that the Planning Cor�nission had recarmended approval of the Housing Plan to the Council. The City Council would be holding a Public Hearing on tfie plan February 23, 1976. We anticipate that the City Council will be adopting the Comprefiensive Housing Plan on March lst. We have scheduled a Public Hearing on the preapplication for a Cortmunity Development Bloek 6rant for March 8th by the City Council. The Section 8 housing proposal will be before the Council at that same meeting. Mr. Boardman said a preapplication for Cortmunity Development B�ock Grants requires two Public Hearings. The Planning Comnission was having the first Public Hearing at this meeting, and they would still have time to continue this item, if they so desired, to their next meeting on March 3, 1976. We still have some leeway and still not miss out on making application for funding this year. Mr. Leek said that the preapp1ication that may or may not go to Hud in March, consists of four parts. Three of those parts consists of forms. The most important part was the Program Narrative Statement. The first portion of the Program Narrative �tatement was a statement of cortmunity needs which were determined by the staff from what had gone on at the Planning Comnission and the City Council levet, and statements of objectives-relative to those needs. The second part of the Program Narrative Statement was the funding �ads whereby the City.hopes td accomplish some of these projects. The third part was the discription of the projects that we were making application for funding to HUD.-The next portion was a discription of the location of the projects. The next section was very important which was the expected benefits which would accrue from these projects, the relationship ef the proposed activities to the proposed needs. The last section was a statertient of who the primary beneficiaries of these projects would be. Chairman Harris said the statment in this Program Narrative Statement that bothered him was number A under Description of Project. This states "The City proposes to acquire approximately 4.5 acres of land adjacent to the existing, administrative offices.....This property is expected to cost $125,00 to acquire. The total cost for acquisition, relocation and clearing of the land is expected to be approximately $125,Q00. The City is requesting $150,000 for this pr_oject." He asked Mr. Boardman what land they were talking about. Mr. Leek said the land they were talking about was the land that was adjacent to the City Hall tn the North. They money we were asking for was to cover the cost of acquisition, and the cost of clearing those lands. Mr. Harris said just suppose that HUD says this was a good idea-and we got the $150,000. Would this money have to be used for that purpose. Mr. Leek said that if we received funds we could use them for any of the proposed projects, but HUD would review to see how those funds had been used. Mr. Harris said that otherwise this request would tell me that the CiCy had to come uQ with another $100,000. Mr. Leek said that Hud did fund on an on-�oing basis, and we were saying that this was a 5 year program. Any future application for HUD funding would be considered on that basis. They wouldn't take a project for one year, fund it, and then aay they wouldn't continue to fund it. Mr. Boardman said the $125.000 Planning Commission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Paqe 20 figure was a type error and it should read $25,OOo. Mr. Langenfe7d asked how much the total request for funding from HUD amounted to. Mr. Leek said the tota1 amount was $335,000. Mrs. Wahlberg said she added it up and it came to $495,000. Mr, Leek said that was the total but there were funds forthcoming potentially from other sources. These potential funds weresubtracted from the amount we were requsting from HUD. Section 8 funding would take care of a large portion of the difference in the two totals. Mr. Harris said that if HUD said they wouldn't give us the entire $335,000 and they gave us $200,000. Would we have to apportion that amount to each project? Mr. Leek said no. Mr. Langenfeld said then how would you establish a priority as to which project you would use the funding for. Mr. Leek said this preapplication wauld go to HUD. They would decide if we were going in the right direction. Then they invite us to make the final application. That was when we would set up our 5 year program. Chairman Harris said he questioned if even a couple of items should be included in the preapp1ication. One was item 6, about the property in Riverview Heights. Mr. Boardman said this item came up at a City Council mee�ing about six months ago. They discussed purchasing these properties because of the hazard of flooding. Another reason for purchasing this property was for a river access property. We felt that this project could relate to a Corrmunity Development Block Grant. We have to relate any project that we request funds for to a specific section of the City. This also was one of the three pri�ary focus areas of the housing plan. If the City Council was still interested in alleviating the problem af flood damaged homes and in acquiring same parkland in the area, we thought it should be in this Comnunity Biock Grant application. Mr. Leek said that under item 3, the figure should be $4,OOD instead of $14,000. Mr. Bergman said that as long as they were checking figures, he wondered about the figure in the 2nd item. He asked if you could rehabilitate 20 homes for $12,000? Mr. Leek said that $12,000 would be used to provide low interest rates for home improvements;.so that figure was correct. Mr. Bergma� said then this was $12,000 interest subsidy. Mr. Leek said that was right. Mr. Langenfeld said he would not want to see all these projects started on a five year plan, and after we were well into them all, have HUD funding stop. Then the City would be in the position of having to come up with the money to finish all the projects. He felt that one project should be completed at a time. Mr. Boardman said most of the money from HUD would be to initiate programs and if the funds should stop, the program would stop. The City would not be responsible to continue those programs. Mr. Boardman said it would depend upon what priorities were given to the projects by the City as to how many projects would be started. He said the development and implementaii.on of a maintenance code might be one thing that would continue if federal funding was stopped. He said that providing low interest rates for home impaovements would be one program that would stop when funding was no longer available. He said that as far as an acquisition program, we would have to acquire all the property in one year. Mr. Leak said that when HUD said up a Comnunity Development Block Grant, they Planninq Commission Meetin9 - Februar 18, 1976 Page 21 combined many different types of funding into one program and they made a commitment that these funds would be availa6le for at least 5 years, so as not to leave cortmunities 3ust hanging. This was the information that he had received from our area office in St, Paul. Mr. Boardman felt that for every year thatFridley got funding, they would be ahead of the game. Mr. Boardman said he thought every effort should be made in applying for these funAs to h�lp the residents of Fridley. Mr. Bergman said he had some problems with both numbers 4 and 6 of this proposal for funding. He asked if the 4.5 acres of land discussed in number 4 actually for sale? Mr. Boardman said it wasn't. Mr. Bergman said it puzzled him how we could be so specific that we were going to buy it. Mr. Boardman said this was an estimated market value offer. Mr. Bergman said he read this as a positive statement. Mr. Bergman said that on proposal 6 where they want to acquire 10 properties; were these in the flood plain? This was the area that would be most directly affected by the threat of a flood. Mr. Scott said the Human Resoarces Comnission would be involved in reviewing the HUD Comnunity Block Grant application at some point. He said that there were many projects that would°be reviewed by the Human-Resources Commission. Mr. Scott.said that the more these projects were re�ated to humarr needs, the much better chance they had of being funded. Mr. Scott said there was a great movement in our country to reallocate the economic wealth in this Country. He said that social framework planning was in the near future, and more and more the human element was being considered and he thought people should be alerted to this. - Mrs. Wahlberg asked where the idea was conceived to acquire the 4.5 acres on the North side of City Hall? Mr. Boardman said it was an administrative idea. He said it was sort of a pie in the sky idea, but if funds should become available for this type of project, it could be dorte. He said a civic center with an indoor swimming pool and other facilities has been discussed quite often. He said it was a1so that this pro3ect would be tossed out during this public hearing process. Mrs. Wahlberg said that she had never heard of this proposal before, and Mr. Harris said that he hadn't either. Mrs. Wahlberg said she had no quarrel with projects that had been discussed under the housing plan, but a couple of these projects were foreign to the Planning Cortmission. These were items 4 and 6. Mr. Boardman said that both these projects were based on needs that had been mentioned at a member Comnission meeting or by the City Council, but they couldn't make application for any funding that wasn't recommended by the Planning Commission and the City Council. �rs. Wahlberg asked what information the City had to back up the requests for a civic center and for acquiring the property in Riverview Heights? Mrs. Wahlberg said she thought $5,000 was a lot of money to ask for a feasibility stucjy on transit. Chairman Harris said he didn`t think it was enough. Mr. Bergman concurred. Mr. Harris said he thought the people who owned the 4.5 acres on the North side of City Hall should be approached before a proposal for a project was sent in for funding. Mr. Boardman said that maybe the Planning Commission would decide that this project was not needed, and they could recommend that this project be eliminated from the appl.i�ation. Planning Comnission Meetinq - February 18, 1976 Page 2Z Chairman Harris said he thought it was a matter or priorities and he thought the City needed other things before it needed a civic center. Mr. Bergman said Chat in considering this preapplication for a Community Development Block Grant, he thought that the projects mentioned applied to the goals and objectives set up in the housing plan except for items 4 and 6. He said they were 6otB a surprise to him, and tie thought that in both these items we had the cart out in front of the horse. Mr. Boardman said that Mr. Bergman was probably right, and they should only request funding that related to the goals and objectives of the housing plan. Mr. Scott said he had some problems with this preapolication. Ne said that what this document was for was to stimulate the interest of HUD. He didn't think there was much in this document to do that. Mr. Boardman said he was open to any suggestions that Mr. Scott wou1d like to make. He said that this was not a staff exercise, it was an attempt to get funding, and if the Planning Cor�nission had any ideas on how this application could be improved, he would be very happy to use those ideas. Mr. Scott said there could bP a statement that these projects would eliminate, reduce or prevent ghettoizatlon.. He said it could say that they wanted to sustain human development with a good life so our community could continue to grow and be a viab7e comnunity. He said the second need, which was to rid the City of substandard housing, he thought was an impossible thing to do. Mr. Boardman said that when Mr. Scott had time to go through this document, he should write down some of his recommendations and give them to the Planning Department. �, _�. -- Mr. Starwalt said that what he was going to say was for himself, and not as a representative of the City Council. He said that to the best of his knowledge, the City had neuer provided housing for anyone in the City, ever. All housing, � all development, a11 activities that have taken place in the City, other than City items, have been done with individual initiative. He said this was all done within the framework of City ordinances, and he thought this had worked out pretty well. He said it would be hard for him to tell the people he represented that the City was considering engaging in a rental subsidy program for some individuals at tax- payers' expense. He did not want to tell the people that the City was considering pushing for su6didized housing for some individuals at taxpayer's expense. He did not want to do that. He did not want to have to say that the City was undertaking housing for the elderly or housing for the underpriviledged. He said he thought all these matters were individual initiative and, within the framework of City codes and ordinances, can be provided on an individual or cooperative basis. He said he thought that this was the way to go. He didn't want to tell people that the City was considering doing any different from that: He said that in this regard, there �rere items in the newspaper saying the City 4+�as doing this, and he hoped the City planning staff wasn't dreaming up projects, or ideas, which he honestly believed would not 6e consistent with the desires of the people he represented. •money was already set aside foratheseeprogramseSandnitawas,mso�whetheraFrwdleyfapplied for this funding or not, the taxpayers dollars wouTd still be spent. The people in Fridley have contributed to this fund through their taxes, and if we do not apply for these funds, then another City would get them. He said that if we did not apply for these funds and neighborhoods became run down in Fridley, the� that definitely would be an expense to the Fridley taxpayers. He said that when the fact was known that this money had already been set aside by the federal government, he didn't think Mr. P7anning GomniSsion �eetinq - Fe6ruary 18, 1976 Page 23 Starwalt should have any problem in explaining this to the citizenry. Mr. Starwalt said the Council was in favor �f the housing main±enance code. He said that-fie was interested in fiav#ng low-interest loans availa�le for, home improvements. He said that these would not be �dministrated by the City but by savings and loan associations and 6anks. He said the aspect of having a resource center available to provide ideas and expertise for people who want to do-it=yourself, so to speak, he thought was good. Mr. Starwalt said that back on the money, you are saying that money was available. He said that the last information he had was that the Federal Government was going to be in the red 'an additional 45 billion dollars this year. That's tax money, 6eing borrowed to make these programs available. He said there were two theories about money. One was the spend yourself into prosperity, which he had never su6scribed to, and the other was pay as you go. He said to say that other communities would get tfiis money, if we don't, was in a certai� sense true. He said 6ut who are we kidding when every year the federal government goes further in debt, and fie felt this was breaking this country down, and he didn't want to see that �appen, and philosophically, he was just trying to point out that a11 the things we see and hear and read about available money just doesn't stack up when you look at it in the long stretch. Mr. Harris said that he thought we were back to buying dump trucks at the federal level. He said that 45 billion dollars was an astronomical amount of money. Our total budget was an astrnmonical amount of money, of which 108 billion dollars were for defense, and on and on and on. He said that it was up to the politicians, including you and me, to sit down and start figuring out some priorities in this country. What is important? Are the people in this country with their needs important, or was buying dump trucks. He said he didn't care if it was the City of Fridley, the State of Minnesota, or the Federal gover'nment, he thought the priorities in this countEy were all mixed up. Ne said we need people to sit down and think about what really counts. He said there were old people in this country who were eating dog food. But we aren't supposed to help those people, no, we've got to draw the line. Mr. Harris said he didn't 6uy Mr. Starwalt's argument. Mr. Starwalt said he agreed with Mr. Harris up to a point, but we didn't have a hold on the federal goverment. He said that he couldn`t go beyond the City's activities. He said the City Council could take care of local items. He felt that if we didn't try to take care of ourselves, no one else can do it for us. He said he was not against the elderly or against people who had temporary adversity, and need heip. He said he was not in favor of what appears to be a continuing effort by a few people for a free 'ride at the expense of a large majority of the people he represented. Mr. Harris said he wasn't angry with Mr. Starwalt, he was angry with himself, but he-found this matter af priorities very frustrating. Mr. Scott said that for the City not to take advantage of these programs he felt was a step backward instead of forward. He thought it would be a disservice to the people in Fridley if we didn't have these programs. Mrs. Walhberg said she was displeased with item number 4, because after we get the money to acquire and clear this land, then we would have to build a civic center, and we, as taxpayers, would have to pay for, so she was not in favor of having this project included in the Comnunity �evelopment 61ock Grant. MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commision cZose the public hearing on the HUD Community Development Block Grant Application. Upon a � Plannirig Commission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 24__ _ voice vote, aZZ voting aye, Chainnan Harris declared the Publio Hearing closed at 22:23 A.M. Mr. Saardman reminded the Planning Comnission that this document had already been submitted to the Metropolitan Council but it could still be withdrawn or changed. Mr. Leek said this preapplication would be going through variaus stages of review until it was heard by the full Metropolitan Council on March 12, 1976. We will be getting reports and camients all through that review. We will have 3 or 4�ays after P�arch 12th to act on any changes that might be recomnended at that time. Chairman Harris asked that if they were going to send an addendum to this original preapplication, if the Planning Commission could get a copy of that. Mr. Boardman said they would get such a oopy. He sai'd that any changes that we send to the Metropolitan Council would be as a direct result of this hearing. He said they also would get copies of anything that was suggested by the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Boardman said they anticipated re-working part of this document. He said he agreed with the Planning Comnission that our projects should be related more to the housing and implementation programs. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Citg Administration be requested to consider the reco�nendations and constructive criticisms made of this document made at this gublic hearing, and to modify the docvment, and to include a future review by the the P2anning Commission of the rewritten proposal. Upon a voice vote, alI voting age, the rration carried unanimously• Mr. Boardman seid that if the Planning Comnission, in re-reading this � proposal, had anyadditional comments to make,they weren't to hesitate in ca7ling either himself or Ray Leek. We would like to have a more enlightened document 6y the time this came back to the Planning Comoission. Mr. Starwali said that he thaught that the Planning staff had done a tremendous job on all af this, and they have been very straightforward. He said he knew they had been doing all this during a limited time, and he thought it was a job well done. He said the fact that he didn't agree with it all, was beside the'question. 7. RECOMM€NDATION ON SECTION 8 HDUSING RESOLUTION Mr. Boardman said they needed aresolution for Section 8 Housing and also a dec�sion on which of two options the City wanted to operate under. He said that one option wBS whether the City wanted to go along with the Metro Council Housing Authority and.let them do the eritire project�.with strickly only `�t4e inspection process at the City level, or do we want Metro Council to do all the dirty work and we will, through our staff, ar� with reinforced personnel from Metro Council handle the screening of`applicants, screening of apartment complex2s, and the inspection. These were the two options. Mr. Scott said he felt there was danger in both options, and we have to start talking about a local Housing and Development Authority. Mr. Boardman said that Fridley would not need an HRA to operate this program. What wQ were dofttg was dontracting with the Metro Council HRA to operate the program. They are doing all federal applications through their program. However, if we do have an active Planning Commission Meetin - February 18, 1976 Pa9e 25 HRA, we need an HRA recommendation to the City Council to follow this program. We do have an existing HRA. They will be meeting to make a recommendation to the Council. � MOTION BY Scott, seconded bg Wahlberg, that the Planning Con¢nission recormnend to CovnciI that they pass a resolution aathorizing the Metropo.2itan Council to apply for Section 8 housing assistance fund. Upon a voice vote, a12 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. It was the concensus of the Planning Commission that they favored the second option for t6is program so that there would be more local control. MOTION by Langenfe.id, seconded bg Bergman, that the Planning Cotmnission recommend to Council that the City of Fridleg operate the Seation 8 program under option 2, where Metropolitan Council would hand2e the applications for funding, but a11 the screening of applicants and apartment complexes and inspection would be under the contsoZ of Ghe City. Upon a voice vote, a1I voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � �IZE LOTS ANO This item was referred to the Planning Commission by the Appeals Commission at their meeting of February 10, 1976. Mrs. Wahl�erg said we table this first request Lo buiTd on a�0'��b� �Tn-Fridley because we felt it"was important that the Planning Commission ana some of the member Commissions`take a look at the number of 40' lots there were in Fridley, which are listed, and take a look at these lots, and determine how they shou}d be used.in tfie future. She said that low and moderate housing was discussed very much in the Comprehensive Housing Plan. There may be a necessity to use some or these lots for this housing. � Mrs, Wahlberg said the property that they considered the variances on was for a house that would be in the $36,000 to $37,000 bracket. She said the Appeals Commission just did not feel comfortable about opening up Pandora's Box on all the 40' lots in Friiiley. Wiiat we are requesting was that the Community Development Cammission, tfie Human Resources Commission and the Environmental Quality Commission Study this problem, and bring their comments and recommendations back to the Plannin9 Comnission so the Appeals Comnission would have some guidance and direction. Mrs. Wahlberg said there was an urgency on this because the Appeals Commission tabled the petitioner's request until they got these recommendations. The petitioner said he wouldn't mind being held up for a few weeks, but he would like to start construction in about two months. MOTION bg Scott, seconded bg Bergman, that the Co[mnunity Development Commission, Hnman Resources Cormnission and the EnvironmentaS QuaZity Commission stvdy and make- ! recomme.nda�ions on the�:+best use of the vacant 40' Iots in the City of FridZey, and� � return--�hese recommendafions as soon as possible. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Boardman said not to forget that the City Council would have to determine the planning policy on 40' lots. Mrs. Wahlberg said that was why she wanted this handled at �his meeting so the petitioner wouldn't be held up any longer than was necessary. Planning Comnission Meeting - February 18, 1976 Page 26 Mrs. Wahlberg said there was a study made in 1971 by the Planning Comnission and on this particular lot, they did feel it was buildable with a small one story house. She said the request they received for this lot was for a split level house with an attached two car garage. She thought that maybe the guidelines set up in 1971 were no longer applicable. Mr. Harris said that at that time he thought the Planning Commission had requested an opinion from the City Attorney on whether we could deny a building permit on AO' 1ots. He said that if the legal opinion hadn't been received, because it may have 6een done verbally, he would like to get a memo o� the legal stand for 40' lots. He said this would help the Planning Correnission with their recomnendation. Mrs. Wahlberg said that our present code said that the minimum lot size was 50' in the old plats. � Mr. Boardman said that the City Council said in 1971 that all lots in Fridley should be considered buildable. Mrs. Wahlberg said that in 1972 the Council said there couldn't be given blanket approval on all 40' lots because some of them were corner lots and some were in the interior of a 61ock so each lot would have to be considered on an individual basis. 9. MOTION bg Wah2berg, seconded by Bergman, that the PZanning Coum+ission continue until March 3, 2976, the proposal that the Mississippi River Corridor be designated as a c-�itical area. Upon a voice vote, aII voting aye, the motion carried u�animouslg.. ADJ�URNMENT: MOTIOP by Langenfeld, seconed by Wahlberq, that the meeting be adjourned. Upon a voice vote, a1Z voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Planning Commission rr�eting of February 18, 1976 adjorned at 1:02 A.M. Respectfully submitted, � r Dorothy E son, Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY � AGENDA j PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEQHJARY l8, 1976 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL C�LL: ABPRQVE PLANNIP�G C0�4MISSIOP! tdINUTES: FEBRUARY 4, 1976 RECEIVE COMP1UNITY DEVELOPMENT COMf4ISSI0N MTNUTES: JANURRY 20, 197G RECEIVE PARKS & RECRE ,—„-,� SSION PtINUTES: J 7:30 P.M. PAGES 1 - 11 12 - 13 14 - 16 RECEIVE HUMAN RE50URCES COPIMISSTON MIfdUT�S: FEBRUARY 5, 1976 17 - 21 Request for funding from City for Fine Arts wili be item 5 of the agenda. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISS:ON t4INUTES: FEBRUARY 10, 1976 22 - 29 Request Policy Statement on building on 40' Lots ,�,� and how this would fit in the City Plan from the �'t Planning Commission and any member Commissions' '`J who would want to respond. This will be item 8 on the agenda. l. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, �P n7o-01,;0 - 32 BY NAEGEI.c OUTDOOR k�VERTIS:NG COMPANY: To al�iow the construc- tion of a 25' x 12' billbeard in M-2 zoning (heavy industrial areas), per Fridley City Code, Section 214.042, located on ParceT 5400 in the South Half of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, ilie same being 8000 University Avenue N.E. 2. PUBLIC HEARIN6: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USF PERMIT, SP #�-02,33 - 38 BY PLYtJ00D hiINNESOTA, INC.: To allow the construction of a O�f ' x 30' billCoard in M-2 zoning (heavy industrial areas), to designate the ertrance to Ply+aood i�linnesota and ldickes, to replace an existing non-ccnforming siyi�, per rridley City Code, Sectiun 214.U42, locatec or� Lot 9, Biock l, Grzat h;o��i:hern Industrial Center, �h� same being 5301 East River itoad �l.E. 3 � 4 ;� LOT SPLIT REQJ[ST: L.�. _?7G-01, BY GCP�SOLIDATED CO�TkiNER 39 CORPOR�lTTON: Split off the Easterly 120' of Parcel 3190, o�� �atcd in �he 'r::v-l;� ef tre PJ4! i/4 of tha South Half ef Section il, to ma�e property linc consisterzt with oresent use, lecated P;orrh oF Qsbor��e Road anu� �j-G,.Y ���. rr LOT SPLi7 RE 1�7,_L.S, ,;="iE-02, (3Y RQi�ALD EN�OGTi;° Split 4;a off the �,estei 5.0 fe2t ui Lot l, f5lack i, Oak Creek ,4dditioi� to create anoth�r b�ildin9 site, the same being 109 Gien Creek Road N.E. '�' '� - 51 � 0 �., , � Planning Commission Agenda February 18, 1976 Page 2 5. REQ!tEST FOR F�NDING FRQM CITY FGR FINE ARTS COMMI7TEE 6. PUBLIC HEARING: HUD CQM�UNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION 7. RECOMMENDATION ON SECTIDN $ HOUSING RESOLUTION 8. POLICY STATEMENT ON 40' AND OTHER SUBSTANDARD SIZE LOTS AND HOW THEY FIT INTO THE CITY PLAN � 9. RECEIVE NOTICE OF CONTIPlUATION OF PUSLIC HEARING IN �I 4 t "b ���y 3�p� ��''� S1I, 3 a�� � � � �� �� fi� ,� � L PNGES 52 - 52 Will receive in mail befcre Hearing. 54 - 68 69 - 74 MATERIAL SENi SEPARATE WITH AGENDA � � � � � � � � ., j �: Y 1' t: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: CITY OF FRIDLEY FEBRUARY 4, 1976 Chairman Harris called the meeting to order at 7:50 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: PAGE 1 Scott, Bergman, Narris, Wahl.berg, Langenfeld Peterson Jerry Boardman, City Planner Ray Leek, Plannin9 Interne Pat Brennen, League of Women Uoters Representative MOTSON by Scott, seconded by Langenfeld, that the agenda be amended to a11ow a group of yoang people to make a presentation to the Planning Corrm!is- sion. Upon a voice vote, all voting age, the motion carried unanimous2y. Mr. Mark Treuenfels, 5248 Horizon Drive N.E. said he would like to pre- sent a proposal for a Teen Center. The proposal was presented to Chairman Harris. Mr. Treuenfels said that the results of a survey by the Fridley Youth Project Committee indicated a desire for a teen center by Fridley teenagers. This teen center would serve as a meeting place for youth where social con-, tact would be possible. This would be an alternative to present facilities, � supplying recreation at a minimal cost. � We will ask the City Council to grant the usage of the unoccupied library space across from the police station. If the space was obtained, we propose to stock it with the following facilities: 2 coin operated foosball tables, 2 ping-pong tables (park department), pinball machine (coin operated), furni- ture, which would include tables and chairs, carpeting, and possibly a used TV (to be donated), and a movie screen and projector, to be borrowed from the Fridley Library when needed. To get this organized, a temporary board,consistin9 of Mike Marsnik, Pat 0'Neill, Bernie and Pat Klein, Ned Storla, Mark Treuenfels, and Sr. Elizabeth of Grace High School> would draw up a charter providing for the means of elect- ing a permanent board. We would also promote public interest by advertising in local school and City newspapers, puttiny posters up in schools and writing P.A. announcements. The temporary board will then be in charge of organizing the election of the permanent board, and will disband. The permanent board will write rules and regulations which will yovern the use of the youth center. The board will be available to the membersfiip and responsive to requesCS. It will be in charge of finances and funding. Upon drafting a charter, it will be submitted to the City Council for approval. As for legal responsibility, w� would ask for the Council's advice and assist- ance. We intend to get some funding from donations from Fridley businesses, comnunity education, a small membership fee {$::50 ?), and �rofit from the coin operated facilities. We intend to have voluntger counselors, mainly from the Fridley churches. He said that St. Williams C#wrch had alreaCy guaniee� Pive counselors. Mr. Treucnfels asked if there v�ere any questions. Planninq Commission Meeting - February 4, 1976 Page 2 Mr. Treuenfels said the proposal he had presented to the Planning Comnis- sion was much more detaiied than what he had presented at this meeting. He � said they may be hiring a part time director for this teen center if it was necessary. Mrs. Wahlberg said it was mentioned that they hoped to get funding from the Fridley businessmen and from the coiri operated machines. She asked if they had any estimate of how much furiding they would need. Mr. Treuenfels said there was no way of estimating the fundin9 they might need at this time. He said that if ±hey hired a professional director, this would make a difference in the funding requirements. Mrs. Wahlberg asked if they were askin9 the City to donate this space free for your use, including the heat, electricity, etc. Mr. "freuenfels said,they wou]d be able to take care of the maintenance of this room.' Mrs. Wahlberg asked Mr. Boardman if the City had anticipated any use of this library space? Mr. Boardman said they were doing a utilization study at the present time, to see if we need any additional staff space. He saio this study should be completed in early March, so that at this time he'could not make a determination as to whether or not we do need that space. Mrs. Wahlberg said sl�e knew that some of the staff were using that space at the present time. Mr. Boardman said it was being used by the Planning internes and Planning aides at the present time on a temporary basis. Mr. Boardman asked Mr. Treuenfels what hours of operation they were think- ing of with this proposal, and how would they conflict with the normal City business hours. Mr. Truenfels said he didn't think it would interfere with � the normal operations of the City. They intended to have it epen after school and week-ends. It would probably be open six to 8 hours. Mr. Qoardman said he could see some conflict in having a teen center so close to ihe operation of City government. There would 6e a certain amount of noise being generated from this area, especially •�vith jute boxes. Game tables and other uses of this room would generate noise. We have had a similar problem i�ith the faosball table antl the ping-pong tables in the Parks and Recreation Department. Tlie Parks and Recreation bEparment has had to limit the use of these facilities quite severely due to noise which has hindered City operations. Cha?rman Harris said it might be well to send this proposal down to the member Commissions so they could study it and come up with some recommendations. Mr. Scott said this item was on the Human kesources Agen�a for February 5, 1376. 4e said this fridleyYo�sth Project Committee was a projert committee of the Human Resources Commission. Chairman Harris said he was thinking more of the Parks & Recre�tion Gommission taking a look at this. Perhaps ttiey could come up vaith an a7ternate ?ocation. Mr. Scott said that many proposals for i>een centers fail, and for this rea- son the Youth Project Committee had been in iiaison with the University of h1i�mesota Cer�ter for Youth Development and Research for advice and assistance with this pro�osal. This Center has agreed to provide professional staff � support for act�vt;ies the Youth Project Cor�mitiee �-:ould want to take on this - matter. Mr. Treueiifels said they were studyi�a suecessful teen centers in other cities. Planning Commission Meeting - February 4, 1976 Page 3 Mr. Bergman said that it would seem that this group had spent some time on this proposal. He asked Mr. Treuenfels if their group felt that they could � adequately control such activities. He said he was referring to overly-active customers, noise, etc. , Mr. Treuenfels said they had thought about that, and this was the reason they were seeking volunteer counselors, and this would give them adult super- vision if it was needed. Mr. Boardman said he didn't know the relationship between the police and youth, but he wondered what effect there would be to having the police depawt- ment across the hall from the teen center, as far as attendance. P�tr, Treuenfels said they had already anticioated this and in surveying the youth, they found that 20 out of 25 didn't mind this at all. Mrs. flelen Treuenfels said this was a two way reletionship. She thouaht she should find out how the police felt about haying a teen age center across frbm their department. She said she talked to Sgt. Kennedy and he thou�ht it was t��rrific and said he would be willing to appear before the City Counc�l on this proposal. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfe2d, that the Planning Conmussion receive the proposaZ for deveIcping a Fridley Yoath Center. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimouslg. �r. Bergman, chairman of the Community Development Commission and Mr. Langenfeld, Chairmap of the Environmental Quality Commission both said they would like their commissions to look at this proposal. Chairman Harris said it � could be sent to all the member commissions -then. Mrs. Wahlberg said the Appeals Commission would look at it and make some comments, but she didn't think they would be coming up with any specific recommendations. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the pro{�osal for develop- ing a Fridley Youth Center be sent to a21 the member Commissions for t�eir review and com�ents. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 21, 1976 Mr. Scott said that on page 16 of these minutes, he had made the motion to alterthe order of the amended agenda to allow Councilman Starwalt to speak instead of Mr. Bergman. Mr. Bergman agreed with this. MOTION by Scott, seconded by Bezgman, that the P2anning Co7runisslon�approve the PZanning Cormnission ninutes of the Janaary 2Z, 2976 meeting as corrected: t^r. Langenfeld said he realized the secretary and Planning staff had been busy because of having three Planning Comnission meetings in.a row and also making changes in the Comprehensive Housing Plan, but the fact that they had only received these minutes this evening, he found it difficult to approve them. Mr. Scott said the members could take time to read them. Mr. Harris said he had already delayed the start of this meeting 20 minutes to give the members � a chance to look over the minutes, but there was a lot of reading. Mr. Bergman asked if it wasri't the no rnial prucedure for the Plannirig Correnission to get their agendas prior to the week end, and this included the minutes. Mr. "�"#� Plannin Commission M2eting - February 4, 1976 Page 4_ Boardman said this was normal procedure, but last �riday the only item ready for�e agenda was the Planning Comnission minutes of the January 21st meeting, We were waiting for the Cammunity Development minutes because we wanted their recommendations on the Coniprehensive Nousing Plan. The secretary for that Commission expected to complete these minutes on Monday. Instead of this happening, the secretary became ill and has been hospitilized all of this week. By that time, the Planning Commission secretary was working on the minutes of the January 28th Planning Commission meeiing, which weren't com- pleted until this morning. It was due to this set of circumstances that the agendas were not delivered at the normal time. He said he wanted the January 2IIth minutes ready for this meeting. �`e did not have any other items for the age�da because the Comprehensive Housing Plan was a separate book. h1r. Scott said this was the first time the Planning Commission hadn't. received their agendas well in advance of the Planning Commission meeting, and it ���as due to unusual circumstances. MOTION by Wah2berg, secondcd�by LangenteZd��that L-he�Planning�Cornmission �� minutes af January 2l, 1976 and Janvary 28, 1976 be tabled until the next meeting. Chairman Harris said that a motion to table superceded the motion for approval. Upon a voice vote, Wahlber.g and Langenfeld votzng aye, Scott, Bergman, and Harris voting nay, the motion failed. Chairman Harris said that ±hey could now go back to the main motion. � Mr. Langenfeld said it wouldn't be in the best interest of the Planning Commission to apnrove the5e minutes when they hadn't been completely read througn. Mr� Scott said Mr. Langenfeld should speak for himself. He had read the minutes and and was familiar with theni. Upon a vnice vote, on the original motian made for approval of the minutes, a11 voting aye, the mot.ion carried unanimouslg. . APPROVE PLANIVING COMMISSION SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MINUTFS: JANUARY 28, 1976 r:OTIDID by Scott, seconded by Wahlber�, that the Planning Commission approve the Special Pablic Nearing mir:utes cf January 28, 1976. Upon a voice vote, a12 voting aye, the motion�carried unanimously.� �� � � RECOMMElvDAIIQN 0,"d 7HE ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHE�NSIVE HOUSIN6 PLAN MOTIOD] by Scott, seconded by Wahlberg, that the Planning Corrunission recommend to Council a�Ioption of the Comprehensive Housing P1an as Written.� t�r. Soardman said �ae bave changed the format so that it was more reada�le. We did make the change tbat Bill Drigans suggested hy havip9 the goals and objectives in the frant of the buok. We have taken the guess work out of the maps by putting each section on one map. We have rPduced the maps so they are � the same size as tfie balance of the bool:. We did group all the charts toge*her under the appendices. The ma�s tvere groupad together the same way and_the housing data and infarmation along F+�ith the population data and information were also in the appendices. � � � Planning Commission Meetinq - Februarv 4 1976 Page 5 Mr. Boardman said it should be noted that under PoTicy Deveiopment and Implementation Plan en page 14, v+e did add the housing maintenance code. This had been left out, and it was not our intention to leave this out of the plan. (A,2). Under A, 4, we did have just the continuation of the bikeway/walkway pl'an and we have added the study of other transportation forms. We felt it was necessary to study these also to increase accessibility in the City. He said they also made an addition under E. on pa9e 16. We added "The City must realize that its zoning policies have a great impact on the long-range development of Fridley. It should therefore examine and judge each proposal for future development for its effects on the environment, the Metro region and the quality of life in fridley." Mr. Boardman said put in both the figure low-to-mo�erate inccme these figures had been bases their figures on with Metro Council and instead o' the previoys 349 instead of 228 out those were the major changes in the plan. They also and percentage where possible. He said that in their level housing, they had to change the figures because based on the structure value only and Metro-Council market value. We rejuggled our figures to agree HUD figures, so we only have 349 owner occupied units 745 units. We now have 138 problem units out of the of the 745 units. Mr.. Scott.said he wou2d like to amend the motion, seconded by Wah2berg, to request the staff to identify by title what the charts consist of, and identify the map series by what the maps pertain to, and include these in the table of contents. Mr. Boardman said they intended to have an expanded table of contents when this plan was,printed. Mr. Bergman said the motion on the floor was a very encompassing motion, and he would like to test a part of it. He said that on page 15 of the Plan he said the three proposals to apply for funds which were to make application £o HUD for Community Development funds, to make application for Minnesota Housin9 Finance Agency funds and to make application for Section 8(rent subsidy) funds. He said he was a littTe bit concerned at our last meeting. He said we all recognize the benefits to our community and certainly to selected applicants. Hor,�ever, there was a negative side. He said that as he understood it and recalled from the last meeiing, for all but Section 8 housing, the property involved was not taxed at the going rate. Irr other words, the rest of the community subsidizes the property tax. This was the property involved in both the Minnesota Finance Agency and Community Development funding, so we are recommending a tax subsidation program. Mr. Scott said we were not. No where in this document were we recommending such a program. Mr. Bergman said he agreed with Mr. Scott in that it was not so stated in this document, but we are in effect recommending subsidy programs that were not going to be taxed at the going rate. Mr. Scott again said no. Mr. Boardman said the only property that would not be taxed was when the Federal Government owned that housing, or the Housing Authority owned tMat housin9. Mr. Bergman said that under 236 Housina the assessment rate was only 50%. Mr. Leek said that they had to bear in mind that the Coinprehensive Nousirig"Plan was not recommending that they apply for 5ection 236 housing. Mr. 6ergman said they were recom- mending that Minnesota Finance Agency funds be applied for. Mr. Leek said that had nothing to do with the tax subsidation program that Mr. Bergman was referring to. Mr. 6oardman said that Minnesota Housing Finance agency was a subsidy to be used �n making low interest housing rehabilitation loans. It was a subsidy � ._ Planninq Commission Neeting - February 4, 1976 Page 6 on mortage loans and has nothing to do with the tax situation. He said that � on page 16 under G, they did state that "It is further recommended that the City continually review existing federal, state and local programs for commun- ity development funds. The City should make application to those programs for which it is eiigible.° In this case, he said they would have to keep a continual watch nr what federal programs were available, and not just limit ourselves to tFruse three programs. Mr. Bergman said t.hat another thing that bothered him was the person pre- senting the availabiiity of tf�ese funds obviously was in a very positive frame. She talked about the 13 eommunities which were already under Section 8 housing. She said this was a great program and that next year they plan on having 26 commiar.ities participating in this orogram, and more the follow- ing year. He said tnat somEOne e1se mentioned that we had already paid our way. He said he had no quarrel with that, but where was the line between what we have paid for and requesting programs that will raise the federal taxes. Mr. Boardman said that he thought that you would find that in a deterior- ating community that if s t' -was not taken, th�s deterioration will te��d to ccntinue, if not ���. Steps have to be taken and monies have i:o be provided from somewhere, if not from the Federal government, then ei'thei° State or local government. How much would local yovernments be wi�lling to spend for the preservation of neighborhoods. He said it was pointed out during the pre��ious meeting that if Fridley did net apply f�r Federal funds, how much difference would that make in Federal taxes, as far � as their spending goes. He:said that whecher Fridley curtailed asking `or funds or made application ror funds, it weuid nct stop the Federal gever•ri- ment �rom ailocating funds for certain projects, Pat arennen said there had been studies made, and it cost a lro* more to rehabilitate areas that were irc a bad state of deterioration than it cost for programs of preservation, so if you were balancing these progra�s, it wa� much better to apply for preservation funds than to finance a full scaie program for deteriorated housing. She said this was the League of Women Voters stand. Mr. Scott said he shared Mr. Bergman's concern the way Federal funds were circled around i�i ever incr�asing amounts, and communiti.es trying to get their share of these funds. I+.e thought this problem was best addressed at the ballot box. He thought we had sufficient problems in our community so that we should take advantage of iederal programs that had already been funded. He said we sho�lidn't deny tne p2onie of Fridley the use of these funds just to p��ove a point: M!�s. tJahlberg said that as ]ong as there are governmental agencies w�hich are out selling these programs to the communities, v�hether we care to join them or net would not affec� the am�ur.t-o1= money that we were going to pay irto these programs. If we chose not Y.o join these programs� W2 are still going to 6e tax�d equally as much. If we don't buy ii, they will go out and seli it to sr,meor�� eise, and we s+rill still enci up paying for iL- no matter what. ihis was the vicious circle the governine��t has placed us in, and in self-defenc, we have to try soneway to qet our mc�ney back. She said she thought this was the leverage i:hey have been using �n mai;y places. ��...-� Planning Commission Meeting - february 4, 1y76 Page 7 Mr. Bergman said that he agreed with many of the things that had been � said, and this was why he had brought up the subject so it could be discussed in this way. He said he did not mean to imply that he had taken one side or the other as a f9rm position. He said he agreed with Mrs. Wahlberg, but he did get tired of politicians saying that the public was demanding more services, therefore, we need money for these programs. Ne felt that with these recommendations that we were part of that public who were making these demands. He said we were an awfully small fish in the stream, but we were joining. Mr. Harris said that Mr. Bergman had a valid point, and someday the government was going to have to sit down and work out some priorities. He said he was also cor,cerned about what they had been discussing, but the alternatives, and he was thinkin9 about the deterioration of the City, was not very promising, and we would like to help provide the City with well- kept homes. Mr. Bergman said that private enterprise or personal initiative were not mentioned as alternatives. Mr. Harris said there was an alternative by which private enterprise coiild do the job, but that would need help from the legislature and that was tax incentives. He said it was his feeling that you could do away with all rehabilitation programs if we went to a system of tax incentives. Pat Brennen said that the Michael Servetus Church had some property which they would like to_deveiop as senior citizen housing. She asked if anyone � couTd tell her how they could get federai funding help with this. Mr. Boardman said she should get in touch with the State HUD office, and see what type of funding was available for private developers of housing for the elderly. Mr. Scott said there was a 1976 Area Plan for Programs for the Ageing under Tit1e III, He said she should check into that program also. He said it was before the legislature at the present time. Mrs. Wahlberg said the program she had mentioned last week which was a self-help neighborhood plan was developed by the Northeast Kiwanis Club. They applied for federal funding, and the City of Minneapolis gave matching funds. There was a slide presentation that was available if anyone was interested in this. Mr. Bergman said the proposed Comprehensive Housing Plan was very well done. It was very we11 organ�zed. It has been greatly improved since the oriqinal draft was presented. He said he thought the administrative staff should be commended on the many hours of effort and organization and talent that have gone into this Plan. Mrs. Wahlberg said she thought it was terrific that for Lhe first time Fridley has an understanding of where they're really at. She thought this was something that as a City t•�e have needed for a long time. She felt this was really 9oing to be a help to the Appeals Commission. Mr. Boardman said . said that when all the goals and objectives had been developed, then ihey would really know where they were at. P4r. Scott said the Human Resources � Coirmission had given their plaudits at the last meeting. Pat Brenne�n said that maybe the Metro Council had done Fridley a service by requiring this Housing Plan for funding applications. Mr. Boardinan said he took a different view. He said this Plan had been coming for a long time whether Planninq Commission Meeting - Februarv 4, 1976 Page 8 Fridley was pressured into it at this time or not. It was a matter of priorities. Ne said the prime issues that were at hanJ right now were the goals and objectiv� He said it was just a matter of putting the program to � ther and getting it going. He said it might take two or three years longer, but we will get there. UPON a voice vate on the motion as rnade and amended, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Boardman sa�id the Public Hearing on tha Eamprehensive Housing Plan before the City Council wou7d be on February 23, 1476. Mr. Boardman said he wanted to commend Ray Leek on his work on this plan. He said he had been aiorking 40 hours a week on this plan since last July. Chairman Harris said he .did a very good job. Mr. Scott agreed that it wafi a beautiful job. DISGUSSION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMFP�T ELOCK GRANT APPLICATIONS Mr. Boardman said the deadline for Community Development B1ock Grant applications was March l5th. We do have to have two puhlic hearings on this application. The Public Hearing by the Planning Comm�ssion will be on February 18, 1976. We are getting it pretty well organized and should have it ready by the beginning of next week. Mr. Boardman said he felt this Community Development B1ock Grantapplication would be in line with a lot of tMings that were in the Comprehensive Haasing Plan, so the P7anning Commission could probably handle this without sending it down to the member Commission�, part of the reason being time. Ne said k�e have-to get the . two public hearings in so we can make application, and the City Council could have its public hearing on March 3th. This way we would have time to make any changes before the deadline of March 15th. Chairman Harris asked aboui the Housing Maintenance Code. Mr. Qoardman said it was included as a recommendation but it would not be going along with the Plan. Tt will be coming early in March. It will be sent to the Plannin� Comnission and from there down to the member Commissions, probably. He said the Comprehensive Plan was just a recommendation and as those recommendaiions were implementpd they would be coming to the Planning Commission. Mr. Boardman said he would have Ray Leek give some background on these Coiiimunity Developmeni B1ock Gran'cs. Mr. Leek said he had a couple of Feder•al registers that outlined the act that sets up Coimnunity Developme,�t t3lock Grants if anyone was interested in lookiny at them. He said that essentially what the Community Development B1ock Grant Program was, was a new approach to allocating funds that were aiready existing. As one part of tiie Housinc� and Community Development Act of 1974, this Grant Prcgram corsiilidates numerc:us special purpose programs into a singie package. tn otiier t�lords, fi.mds can be used for a wide range ofconununity �mprovement pr�yrams. The prcgram e�as administered by HUD. ihe list of eligible activit.ies for (31ock Grants that each community reeeives, inc1udes lar.d acquisition, the makir.g of puhlic improvements which can in�lude such things as �nstal'laticn of storm sew�rs where appropriate, building com- � munity facilities for the a?deriy or �or the co�nunity's young. Another activ�t,y that was eliyible was hou�in� rehabil?tatior�, v+hich was a recommenrJa- tion incl�ided in the Plan. Code enforcemerit was another eligib7e activity. Any �anit c` local government can apply for funding. tJhat happens in the State _ . _ _ Planninq Commission Meetinq - february 4 1976 Paqe 9 of Minnesota was that from the basic amount that was available, certain entitle- ment cities and urban counties (Minnesota only has one urban county and that � was Hennepin County) get a certain percentage of those funds. These funds are taken off the top and what was left were called discretionary funds, which every other local unit of government may apply for. That means that whoever makes application was in competitior: for the remainder of those funds. He said the funding would be about two miliion dollars this year. Mr. Leek said that each comnunity had to make a preapplication which goes to their regional development commission, which in our case was Metropolitan Council, for review. Metro Council sends their reviewal comments o-iith the application on to HUD. This was reviewed by HUD, and if it was found to con- form to the general guidelines and the program was found to be warranted, then that community was invited to make a final application, which would include a housing systems plan, in our case the Comprehensive Housing Plan. Mr. Leek said this was basically the way Comnunity Development Block Grant applications were handled and he would try to answer any additional questions the Planning Commission might have. Mr. Scott said that last year NUD received 100% more applications than they had money, so there was a lot of corrpetition for these funds. Mr. Boardman said that in the metropolitan area there were three entitlerient cities which were Minneapolis, St. Paul and Bloomington. These and other entitle- ment cities in the state receive automatic funding off the top of the money available, to continue certain prograr�s that they already have. After these � entitlement cities it goes down to urban counties. Hennepin County was the only urban county in our area. He said that last year most of the entitlement cities made application, and it ended up that all the communities in Hennepin County blocked together under Hennepin County's urban cour�ty portion. They couldn't get any money by going it alone, so they grouped together under urban county, and they all got funded under urban county. Mr. Leek said that after the top had been taken off the funds by entitlement cities and urban counties, it left 1.2 million dollars in�discretioriary funds for the entire state. He said that meant that only 16 communities outside of the metropolitan area received any funding. It was expected that there wouldn't be much more in discretionary funds this year, maybe 20% more. Mrs. Wahlberg asked who would make the decision on how much money would be applied for and what it would be used for.within the City of Fridley. Mr. Boardman said that the administration was writing out certain programs that we feel would be eligible for application. This would be subject to the recommendation of the Planning Comnission and approval by the City Council. Mr. Boardman said he didn't know if they had any chance of getting any funding but they would have made a start. Mr. Langenfeld asked if Mr. Boardman could explain then what they meant when they said at the last meeting that Fridley had a top priority rating. Mr. Qoardman said this o-ias two different thi�gs. We are in the top priority S as far as housing 9oes, but as far as any HUD Cortmunity Development Block Grants go, we were probably sitting pretty low on the totem pole. Applications are given higher prtior'ity -if they relate to housing as to over crowding and the �,,•'.'T , _ _ .. _ . _ Planning Commission Meeting - February 4, 1976 Page 10 deterioration of the housing stock. These are the two criteria that they judge all applications. Mr. Scott said he thought there was more than that and that they had almost � as complicated rating system as the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Leek said he had been to a workshop which pertained to applications being made by communities in the Metro area. The Metro Council in evaluating the applications that come before them have actually three criteria they use. One was that there was a concentration of low to moderate income groups in the community. Another was that the applications address residential needs in terms of rehabilitation. The third was that there be a stimulation of reinvestments in blignted areas, so that programs would not only be govern- ment subsidized but would have funding. Mrs. Wahlberg saiG she didn't see how Fridley could meet the criteria for over crowding or for deterioration of housing to get these funds. Mr. Soardman said that was the problem. He said that with these criteria it was easier for small towns to meet these criteria than first ring suburbs, but that did not m2an that the first ring suburbs weren't having a problem with housing starting to deteriorate. He said these smaller towns were older than Fridley, so their housing stock was older and there vtas over crowding so they met the criterza set down by HUD. Mr. Boardman asked Mr. Leek to relate some of the programs that would be mentioned in Fridley's Hud Block Grant application. Mr. Leek said that one of the programs they ��ere talking about in our � application was the establishment and implementation of the struciural. and exter�c,r housing maintenance code; and systematic enforcement ot �Lhat code in priniary target or primary focus areas that were talked about in the Housing °lan. We are also applying for the HUD money for purpose of housing rehabil- itation. In other words the money would be used to help make home rehabilitation loans within the Gity. We'are also talking about using that same HUD money to establish counseling or a referral service, whereby there would be a central file of resources of who to go to and where to go if you want help in rehab- ilitating your home or making home repairs. This was the major thrust of the application that we are developing. We did talk about a coupie of other things. We talked about the developing and helping to implement an information and referral service that serJices Fridley, this would not preclude helping an existing service. Anather type of program that we were making application for was the continuation of the Ci-ty bikeway/walkway system and a study of any other form of transporation and implementation plan for a transportation system withi�� the f,ity of Fridley. We were talking about the construction of a senior citizen csnter'to provide the necessary services for the City's elderly population. Mr. Boardman said another thing they had discussed was the acquisition of land in the Riverview Heights area. This was in the flood plain area. Mr�. Scott asked about the dowr�town area. Mr. Leek said that wl�en you talked about downtcwn rehabi]itation pragrams and industrial ericnted programs, you were talking about two different things. Nir. Scott said he was talkihy about helping the commercial centers in Fridley. He said that an interna7 transporta- i tion system in Frid]ey wouldn't do any good if you didn't have any place to 90. �-,s - Planning Commission Meetinq - february 4, 1976 Page 11 Mrs. Wahlberg asked if there was any single proposal in this application that was for senior citizen housing? Mr. Boardman said that at this time, � he was not all that convinced that we need a specific senior citizen housing program. He said he would like how the Section 8 subsidized housing program affected the senior citizens in our community. Mr. Scott said that Wyman Smith had already approached the Human Resources Commission about senior citizen hoiasing on part of the Michael Servetus property. Mr. Scott said that at the present time, only 2.1% of the population in Fridley were senior citizens. Mrs. Wahtberg said that as she had mentioned at the last meeting, the Appeals Commission was concerned about senior citizen housing, and that although the senior citizen population probably didn't warrant a separate housing program at this time, most of the land in Fridley taas already in use, and she thought that land could be set aside for this purpose, and be used at a later date. She felt that senior citizen housing, in order to be effective, should be close to shopping and other facilit�es. She said that a lot of citizens in Fridley had parents who wer2 senior citizens and would like to have them live in Fridley. Mr. Boardman said you would have to have a Housing Authority to provide senioG citizen housing, and this was still some where down the line. Mr. Scott said he thought the items that Mr. Leek had mentioned that would be in the application for HUD Community Development Block 6rant funds sounded good. Chairman Harris said the oniy problem would be to get NUD � to give us the money. PLANNING AND ZONING INSTITUTE: FE3RUARY 25 & 26, 1976: "THEY NEVER LTSTEN TO US" Mr. Boardman said that as many members of th� P7anning Commission who could arrange to attend this Institute session should try to do so. Chairman Harris said he taould try to arrange to attend. Mr. Bergman said he would try to do so a]so. The other members said they would see what they could do about attending. Mr. Boardman said they should let him know by February 13, 1976 so that all the reservations could be made at one time. ADJOURNMENT: MOTIOY by Bergman, seconded by Scott, that the meeting be adjourned_ Upon a voice vote, a21 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the PZanning Commisslon meeting of February 4, 1976 adjourned at 10:02 P.M. by unanimous vote. Respectfu]ly submitted, � ����rf,� Dorothy EverrSon, 5ecretary i °. _ �-z , � � COt�N1UNITY DEVELOPMENT COhiMISS10N �18E'fI�lG OP JMIUARY 20, 1976 Chairman Bergman called tlie meetin� to order at 7:45 P.M. MEMBERS PRGSENT: Bergman, Oquist, Lindblad, Forester I�MBERS AI35ENT: None OTHERS VltL-SENT: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Ray Leek, Planning Intern 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROD1 THE JANUARY 6, 197G MEETING MOTION, Uy Oquist seconded by Lindblad to approve the minutes of the January 6, 1976 meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried. 2. CONTINIIEb DISCUSSION OF COkIPREHEISSIVE HOUSING FLAN MOTION, by Oquist seconded by Lindblad to receive the Housing Plan. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried. MOTION, by Oquist seconded by Lindblad that this Commission recommends to the 1'I� anning Commission that on Page 13, of the Housing Plan, that Goal 2, objective 1 under Conununity Development be retained as is with the addition of the phrase "without discrimination" to Objective 1. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried. MOTION, by Liadb2ad seconded by Oquist that this Commission recommends to the Planning Commission that on Page 16 of the Housing Plan, that Item 2a III be deleted from the Implementation Plan. llPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried. � MOTION, Uy Oquist, seconded by Forester that this Commission recommends to the Planning Commission that en Page 17, of the Housing Plan, t]iat the 2nd alternative for a Section 8 program be implemented. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried. 610TION, by Qquist seconded by Lindblad that this Commission recommends adoption of the Housing Flan witli the recommende3 changes. UPON A VOICE 'dOTE, a;l voting aye, the motion carried. 3. SF.T UP A PROJCCT COD"�tITTEE FOR TkIE REVIE�V OP THE SSGN OhCINr��CP. Atr. Boardman staied tnat the sign ordinance is not accomplishing the purpose for which it is intcr,�leu. P(r. 6oardn;an stated the sign ordiriance contniiis � nothing to control signs in shopping centers, and design oriented si�;ninE* (using a sign thaL is part of tl:e shopping center design). �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPP�NT CO[�V�9ISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 20, ]976 Page 2 i MOTION, Uy l.indblad seconded by Oquist that this �ommission recommends � to the Planning Commission that the sign ordinance be deferred to staff for writing and then sent on to the Planning Commission. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried. 4. REVIEW THE CITY CODE FOR SECOIvD ACCBSSORY &UILDINGS Chairman Bergman directed to the secretary that the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of December 3, 1975 and the Council meeting minutes pertaining to the most recenY request for a second accessory building. Also, the pages in the code book with the total lot coverage requirements and the allowed activities in residential areas. Chairman Bergman stated that this commission cannot possibly act on this item unt�l the above mentioned minutes are obtained. Chaixman Bergman adjourned the meeting at 9:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, %�u��r.o�C �.�.�3 Raymond Leek Planning Intern � � MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETIN6 JANUARY 27, 1976 �..� Meeting was called to order at 7:5d p.m. � MEt46ERS PRESENT: Harris, Peterson, Seeger MEM6ERS EXCUSED: Caldwell, Wagar OTHERS PRESENT: Eari Ellenwood, i060 S Circie N.E., 784-3562 - Carl Morphew, 1005 S Circle N.E., 784-53II8 Henry Peterson, 6312 Pierce St. N.E., 571-8804 Tom Nehring, 291 67th Avenue, 571-9352 - F.Y.S. Steve Coy1e, 4508 FiTlmore, 574-9067 " Virg Farasyn, 700 Rice Creek Terrace, 571-1624 Dan Huff - City of Fridley - Naturalist David Torkildson, Director - Anoka County Parks • Mike 0'Bannon, 5298 Filmore St.N.E., 571-8865 MINUTES 8andstand �� L� F.Y.S.A. Don Narstad, 7101 Highway #54 N.E., 571-5660 - 49'ers Dick Kinsmin, 1348 Hillcrest Dr., 571-0764 - 49'ers Jim Klemp, 7516 Tempo Terrace, 786-1838 - AAU Swimming 3udy Wyatt, Secretary - Parks and Recreation MOTION BY NARRIS, seconded by Seeger, to accept the minutes of December 22, I976. Motion carried. F.Y.S.A. Messrs. Nehring, Coyle and Farasyn were at the meeting to continue discussion �of the Girls Softball Pro9ram. The coRmiissioners explained that they wished to clarify some points regarding the program. Mr. Peterson said they were most con- cerned with the rules and regulatinrs under whicn the F.Y.S.A. was operating. fie said the commissioners wanted to meet with the F.Y.S.A. personally and go over the agreement which had been signed by Paul Brown and themselves. He mentioned that the agreement between �he F.Y.S.A. and the Parks and kecreation Department states that the Parks and Recreation Commissien reviews their bylaws, playing rules, etc., so that they are mutually agreed upon. He said he would like to see their bylaws, piaying rules, and their methods of handling it before they consider it final. He felt that one way to eliminate problems was to hae•e an agreement on how to handle items before they start. Mr. Harris concurred with Mr. Peterson. Mr. Reterson asked Mr. Nehring when would be a good timetable to come back to the Commission with all this information. Mr. Nehring indicated their bylaws, rules, etc., were in the process of being revised and he stated they wou7d be completed by cur February 23rd meetiny. Mr. Peterson asked the F.Y.S.A. to return at their February meeting to finalize the a9reement for the Girls Softbail program. fc7:�i`[lli:�� Mr. Henry P2terson was at the Yheir last meeting he had appeared in Fridley. I;e said he had 'ooked �6rown. At this time he introduced i meeting to explain to the Comrnission that since bufore the 49'ers to 9et appi,oval for a bandstand at sites that mo�nir.g �aiLh Tiessrs. Harstacf ard Mr. D. ld. IlarstaG to the Conurissicn. �� Page 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING �ANUARY 27, 1976 Mr. Harstad explained that the 49'ers Committee had authorized him to drdw up • a set of plans and make an estimate af the cost. He said the estimate had to be submitted to the State by Friday, January 30th. He said there was a slight possibility that some partial funding of this project might be available based on it being a Bicentennial project. Mr. Harstad continued by saying that the sites they had looked at that morning had a lot of inerit. However, is is on fill ground, so if that were where it would be built, the footings, etc. would have to be designed differently. The location is at East Moore Lake between the tennis courts and the lake. He cited a number of reasons why it would be a good location, i.e., near refreshment stand, parking, etc. Mr, Bob Peterson explained that at the last meeting the Cor�nission had made a motion stating they would support any site which was agreeable to the 49'ers, the Band and the City Staff. Mr. Henry Petes-son indicated the Cast Moore Lake location seemed to be agree4:ble to Paul Brown, as being the least disruptive. Mr. Kinsmin mentioned it would be a good location for a bandstand as many people would see it as they drove down highway #65. The commission advised Mr. Henry Peterson that his next step should be to contact Mr. Paui Brown and ask him to write a letter to the City Manager indicating his approval of the site. The next steps are the Planning Commission and then the City Council. 1976 COMMISSTON MEETING DATES MOTION BY SEF.GER, seconded by Harris, to change the meeting dates of the Parks and � Recreation Commission back to Mondays for the rest of 1976. Motion carried. Mrs. Seeger requested that since the meetings are shown on the 1976 calendar as being on Tuesdays, a mailing explaining the change to Mon�ays be sent along with the Spring and Summer Bulletin to the residents of Fridley. LETTER OF RESIGNATION MOTZON �Y H7SRRIS, seconded by Seeger to receive the letter of resignation fr.oin Pau2 Brown and concur with his decision with relactance, and suggest tiiat when the City Council and staff decide to invo2ve tbAmselves in-the 5election process of a repZace- emtn for Pau1 Brown, that the Parks and Recreation Cormnission be considered to be a yartial screening group for this selection. Mction carr.ied. Mr. Peterson, on behaif of the Commission, asked the secretary to.,convey to Mr. Brown theit� nest wishes and success in his new endeavor. �� . v RICE CREEK - lINO LAKES RE6IQNAL PARK Mr. Torkildson was preser.t, along with Messrs. 0'Bannon and Huff, to discuss the Lino Lakes Regional Park project. He �cplained that in 1470 Anoka C,ounty cnrducted a comprehensive study with Ramsey Ccunt,y thr�ough a joint powers agreement, and came up with a total plan for the Rice Creek corridor with a portion ��ihich involves the City of Fridley. He had brou9ht alony sor=�;� riaps which he showed to the c.ommission. � He explained the areas which were al,°ead�� in pubiic use. He said their objective was to create i.his corridor all ;.'rie �:,ay da�•m to i+lahnoman Park from Lino lakes. Pa9e s r`.MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETIN6 JANUARY 27, 197b �6 Messrs. 0'Bannon and Torkildson shoVred the commission on the map the areas which �need to be obtained in order to complete the corridor to Mahnoman. They explained that they want to trade Fridley's holdings in Rice Creek Park for 12 acres of tax forfeit property in North Innsbruck. They showed the coirenissioners on their maps, the areas in North Innsbruck a�hich are eventually going to be turned over to the City and indicated they wanted to make niore land there, currently in tfieir controi, available to the City. They, in turn, want the area in Rice Creek Park. Mr. Torkildson indicated that it need not necessarily be a chan9e in title, but perhaps a"workin9 agreement". They need control of all the land bordering the creek, so that they can make trails, parkinq facilities, etc., avai7able to the public. They assured the comnission that this will be a non-motorized corridor. Dr. Huff stated that the City Manager had requested him to ask the County how much money they would be willing to add to the acquisition cost of Rice Creek, as he didn't feel it was an even trade. He said the total for all acquisitions and pending assessments amounted to approximately $29,000. Mr. 0'Bannon replied that the tax forfeit land they had, could be put on sale for $29,000; that he had been holding it since 7962. Mr. Peterson advised Messrs. 0'Bannon and Torkildson that the proper procedure would be for Dr. Huff to get together with Mr. arowr, and, with the City ��anager's concurrence, write a proposal. The next step would be Parks Commission, Environmen- tal Commission, Planning Commission and City Cou�cil. Dr. Huff said he would talk to the City Manager and explain the County would like a proposal whereby the first choice would be an outright swap of the two properties without an exchan9e of money, ,• and secondly, if the Council would not agree to that, then a cooperative agree�ent to use tha land. AAU SWIM CLUB Mr. Jim Klemp �as present at the meeting to request financial help from the Parks and Recreation Department for his pro9ram. Ne stated he wou7d also 7ike to see his program integrated into the Parks and Pecreation program. Mr. Klemp ex- plained that the swimming levels are broken do�,�n into three groups, i.e., A, B, and C, and also according to age. He said they are chartered now in Fridley-Spring Lake Park and they have coaches at the pools at both junior highs. Mr. Peterson suggested Mr. Y:lemp cor.tact Mr. Tom Nehring of the f.Y.S.A. and see if thzir organization v;ould be irterested in helping them or taking tnem under their wing. Mr. Paterson ther suggzsted Mr. Klemp could come back to the Corimission meetirtg after meeting with the �.Y.S.A. ihe next regular meeting will be held o�i Menday, February 23rd at 7:30 p.m. in the Classroom of City Flall. Res ectfully submitted, � _.:��� ,�'�,,�� � J dy Wyatt, Secretary to tf�e Cor.:�ission ~ � �x� 4 � f �i lii1� 5 }�", .: . �'� ��Y4�rera:Shea, ffarqld �g�um�' Grace.Lynch,`, _ ; RNne�r La�nhert, iiilli� S.Catt wBSS�: ��ae �� 38NT: Ned Storla - YPG L�sa Treuenfels- - ?�� :.. De.u�sa :�yncb - YYE ' ' Hoa�a�d .�iattson � Gt�y, 4� Fridle con ScntL apsaed L�e meetiag�a� �=?.t�� p.m. q Gra�se �,yneh, secoaded by S��ase�a.3hea, to appXove the 'Q£ the 3`anusr j 8, �976 Humaa �tR'i��?�ces Commission meeting �n-. Upon a voice:voLe,, a11 vss���sg=.aye, the motion carried ��i"• �, �iHAn+H�.4rtilR!F .i�it(liRffT !`fl'MMTTTRkt �.::.Y�}#--C'T(1.32LA� .. . �a stated this praposal had.beea-st►Fs�itted by a graup_ �n tha 7Cout�_Pioje�t Cammittee.`:�� added the=YPC has x the propvsal, but cou3.d �vt �� it their £ull eupport #�t�d the pracedu��s of the oLh� �sanp conflicted with �;;�ite_ �PC. H� w�s � referr3ng -to ��e-;r+tfi�er grouP'8 P&aPosal ��$hing a Board of Dir��tQrs '�°3[ft.- $torla stated Yhe YPC �t�y th�t a-teea center ehctnld be.�stablished in Fridley. u7a .stated he feit -3t waa 'vgr�°,b4t��hq for competition, to �n°g.yougg Pevp2e. :lt� s�ated he had delegatetl a.�r'e�p of yqung people to go sae$ 3uior�ation �n a teea c�a-Le�,. lfie added they did �.,back t�e in��ar�ationr Inst�a�k.�. ��iey formed their own ��t'€elt the Suman Resources Cnmmissi4n;should makg an # auit'e.the two grouga. 4 � �k, �s4+��'•8kated the Youth'Pzojec'. � � �, �,��.�$� expertise itE,.s�ritiug: ''_ � ������6�tYSa1 �should< state the aa� ; �`�,�we uL��i:zed. t4r. Scott add+ � �t�����3 b�silding. .:�:If Cb� Humag� � ��Frap a�d the teen ceater do� ��' ' ����� Q�;tp Aali, the yuuth may�� e,� �►` C�� �act4�r. He st�ted the •�omi _x�� �� �����d� .a citauce �o� xeasa�a$1 .ee should seek sQme �flsal for a teen center. �ou�s the teen cettter #y Ha11 is an admin- :� Gpmmission says "yes" Ftk out in the lo�*er �e aaother chance for cit�i.v2d approve a proposa1 :s� . �w�,.�r.. - � � . �: �. � � . , s� (: i �1 � ' ..._� _._ �..`a)?+�i. �.... . . � � , �,� �1�AN RE50IIRG�� Pal1� s Ti�fl �� �ie�:�i�� a.t� � �� �si : � �om��; �s�%�s��aaY-���` it:' � .�� �r:. "���gum ask� �ould lse�. Mr. ` � b-e�co�po��d nf�� eet up in the � $.11�se�ct 'ta hav� 4 '� � .� EiT. S��+Ct Stat� jt`awaittca =g�odac� ittt�.us� tee�e s -. � �t���� ���-�. � �a;io�i �waul��d b �' �: Se�� ��gi� ���n� � ���� if1 obta.�sing i�it c+��tar :!���f^ad its; Y �[�: ' #'�:, ���'�`E stat� �e �pf�€s�r g�c�t ° ��ii�,€� �s�g�aY, � ,F ' . .+ , !., �.'_ _ �ii° �s it�?�'�". t��%�'` ���'' �#.}:��i#i �., ,. � ��'` �htgk �� � �� ` � " F (��; t���a � ,�, k� � � ���w-�� �g� ,�,. � ii"�S'ct�.,� v�ts t c e uQ IS � . �ttM�`��Ti�� ` �'�� , �., �Ja� Co rvF ��i�#�'y �8�1 „ <° :. . �� z�. '. ... 4 'r ��0 K _�������•�� . � �da $CUiE 8�8G� �or tk�tt ::p�'�sen�� ,,�� the ��uh�.ic � �t�ading" �rrb. ? 'R3.�`nttirigr G6mmt$ �; � � �`�8ii - ts ' G r s�.sF Y� ��$ ��,�8. S�i �� =t%e��c�.s� s .���ed...uri�li�.:� t � �, �.� . _ , . , _ �,'�GSf�isw. . . __. . .� ��... n� 's`th�'Cfi rttva otr Eeople ha dE ii�' ac center c :du : � ., a p°a�k t`� �� ct�.�. af tk��� A ' =a xe��ee auth g�ot Tig ay�; '1 RTGH�E$ ,� f� �- $ ,. � > .� �1e�� i.i� th� �kty i��11,.. He � rp xsiC�t'.`s�me ���xy �u�t`ifi.ea �e cr� ,n 6trsrd :ci� �liret#ors �' 6c�r�:o'� d��e�et�aa& �tiould �d t€ �he te�n center we�e dil�"�#e �gt}��.-s�on1�� be- � b�s�c�= ,�'" z`�T�.L� Ti��:�4��itS ' ��.�HS � Q�,1 .. :.� � . . ths� have.s4me.fir�t-ciass � � ztTy: a�raiys ��ol� a p�l£ce ; �?G£�i��iaa.;�o stim+�ls�� �zttE�est ��a.;�t� w�4ti�.a as�fl� ��a i�rC t#e eonc.eg�� o€; ;�`h� teen .. � � : �.. 3 , . � ���aaY< �a�i¢r ,d.��raY,' if ¢�t�� o�' ei�do�ses��� �ir t�ie3� �$ 6��►#sa�icr# :meeti�. � e€+�� "5h��, °1�hat �I�d°s_. S�orla �: ��i t!s ` F3 o j$c � Cca�t�..t,.�ee ; �Sxxt' k�"w�arr�, �`:��'.�as�vention. , # :_ �� � ati�e, �yP��bt��iti�,a#.>ct3x�ctors, cot�� �r� �n�#eck:. iaf.�°+�aete.., �v3�a�ca�rzi�d v���#ms�sly. �T'���: r:: ke. tts e ° g�z�t1 �� c1 e a t t 2�a,£t � �o ap�z�s adtd Esy'� �i�ng.��".1at Ce vo�e,. v�y �fr�`� tR� �nm�n i: � _ � Y = Sh�a g�� �er ro�ittee ,�: �mmm���an 2eae1 �t3 ��E� . �.d s'n aa#t- 3� ��eir���y 4 # , I975 : �i���i� �"1B� _a� w*�ttten. ��ffi�' ��+'.$PFrave`<;ha s�-:. �k�.�ry,�2&. i976 � �:��,:the motiots ..,_,. .�,v �G.: , . _ «. a. � , i h YF;: � ��,,.�g�!C �� �� k` . �,.�.tate¢ ��.�e Ehe Fine Ari C�e�an Resou�cas �ommissioa„i ��at the city s�auld fixtarti �� >Fine A�'ee Committe2 is> �t explained the"Commun#ty.f She added tite Gommittee � �EaSed �he did not feel -t� �t sCated ti�e 'City should fa ���t��.�e �ow�;-fu�#ding rac�eaCs x i t4 ~ . �. � :Yee actually b�gas �e £eeling of t�e kst a portion:o# it. . ;o€i,t making organiza- �o��.�, donated $1800 to the ss :aa�t3ng f or $ 700 f rom �i� s�should fund this. rr� e�tktural aspects of- life �::A4�Fects . �f��t tlte`Citp. shonid -fu'ti+�� �eyZs-im�ge of a bedcoam es� sEated thera ��e a grea� a �s seea a; 3.i�e prodti�t��t�a. 3ait of Qur Z3ves. Ch�l.dxen zecrea�3on,. �p� #r8it4g is 1i€e-7.�ng; �iC�>, This could hel'p �isit�e.�Y� . r�1�mmr of people in Fridley ;",�'t�, added fine arts:: ie an �e�tq#t7,d grow up with theater at �i�ig Yo[e, ail Vocing aye, c�te :mq�ar,on carriea- u.nanimous_iy. .. B ara Shea seconded b. G�:aaa�.' ach that the Fine L�tee: asl� the PlanningCczmmtssi�. o�r= fi�QO. Upon a vnice vote, �'s�e, the :tuotiou. carri�d up�si�oc��ssly. �t vill �pgear aC-the Piaani�g,;�u�ssion meeeing of E8, i976 to <diaci:ss this issue. `4 �E $�QIIZSSHEPY�S' - GRAC$' Li€�T���fy �Ft�g ie Ms. I�gae�fs report oa,lf�r��i+aace .6U2, Beer: • �3.43.2 - Iu£or88ti.on regui.r-e�3 it� �xtdition to that i�hich may be r'e¢u�red by the $�S�.±k��3riquor Control Comm3ssionxrs " form. _ �£'�, AS$ins;� Minnesota H��t�'4� ����a"-Act, Chap_Cer 363, Sub- 83visiaa 18, also R��4ii� ��ts ,Fri.v�scy law. ,' e. _Right-to Rrivacy Act. � . , . . . . .., . . . . .�.�,x. ., ._.. .. .. _ . .._ _ . _ . .. .._ asu�.. �a..,zv-� . . .. . .. . . .;�....�: . . -} � �tt�!lADf 1FI�SFlU,RC�! �1�Fs'$. �''9�3�. :VT � -.3����"����E3� � �,.� _ � � ��'�'iE : - 3 i . ,z , - �, kF � '�� a °�'�e��':�the vo.ri ' `�� qtt# -: � :` e-,'! , #:�'���#�1- �t�t l�iw�ro� �s. Lgn�hls p� �. ��Iti� � ,BA�'%itt�'it .'C'6'41"��% � a .... ss6-♦ Y}Ti�,���{�f��:. Gammi�atsrn te � ��Y�n�'{i�.Oo{� �.4y �1�� �Apa�Al.����3''�Y4# l�Fi. Eeigu�s sta� � ec�itt�3ra�ie�8tal�s :r'. �irtisle` tt�: tite i:� �: � se"�r���.v�. �a i+�: ,,, fir'� �is��i�rnba#�ai } ��!euci t%i�s P� # �fir� c�u3d cos�nt; �°' t' , r: �` ����vue=:-�+€ t�te � ,� ��'t�` '��iti�sl �i �. : � � �� � ..�� � �`4�� �o�aiissicsl�"• , A�a�`i3 s��ce t� �� ' ` VTiZ �iii�4P,.�i ���5..A� � ' ��i�s �ammns�t�� � 't3t� xii�mar! ��.$T�I � :�t-;t�ttts Gd�����; � �'fi�e Com�atssio��; � e ena2oss` :4 A,umhi � applicatfoa. � } µ �'- � i8 a � �� � ' lif�(Y S � g��; x� S�zdt-t st�� � it�aR�#�g 8�`- � ��+� �m#i:��,ih� �r#a3 E� �._ � . _ . . �� t �`8ey A,c. G, D�tinr�: � n+acy i�ct Upo� a �� . ts� be p1 r£�ls vthe �'`tated:st �-e t a f e# .on tl�#s appYYem tate 'nek @E r €Gute e�Yt � on ffebr F� i'; 2 � �P��t' 3b4. Als.a Consii�tut3on, �e��s�s" pv�ai.�ic�enC for pas:t af�'`�u�ge'st ��sestion her r,°r�t� #nv�alw�iag liquor, `; . '. - � _ `. '3so.: Human :Righe$ Aet. • �y$' �E3��'���ns}�sx: stg-te� . ��� �b�*s .8hes, �e .�dngt 't�` �ofie, ali,ve€;Cing aye, � `� $ m�.t3:ug -of� t� Fj.�naing ,`: r� ' � x� t�3a prvgxeFm is've�y � 8 t� p,l��.; the: #€arx�ist � ly -t�iBCUSi1 i�t, The..Cuu- 'rE���s�d . ` ek►e fe1L` mel�y ;y�uth �r�nld ui�d. �at�E�j s�Ze�;ssi�� :fsl�t ��� � � x� ei:�� �e,is��#d to �ife ���3.��r��. ' � � 't�r'�ae �t+r Yh.e manth `of ' �s �:°�1�.. Tisuriaday.' t �� �he�� �f��r ca��a•for ha k��tre oE liuman � ` , : � � �1 - ; g:� , :."° 3�r� -��t�i„�a�C�d :`1a� *aou}.d � ���s �.�ri�?'�-i'ti� tlse- At ��_..c5 ' . . � ��} i � �'> e�i ��ss� �r'aa�:d be at�ending _ _, ; �`��:��i��`��v�rr�"�isten to us'". .��:=a�d� �b. ,�� � � , stated � �SION � ,; � he voui,it. �a §hauld send � ����� �� ' : �, � �� �s _ eraon•much 1o�ge Vice-Chair;pe�son �°t���ai�saion tv'�hts meeting. �.;:1Fp=,��acy Laabert, ssconded ,bp G•�:�.es��bgnch, to send �3Ce- ��;i: Harbaza Shea, to the_ m�et�.sti�;. emt3tled "They Never I�i':'.�ss:t�a., Upan a vaice aote, 8,i.i,Ya�ing .aye> the motion �ea% u��imoua ly .. �iTr' �q �t,aacy Lambest, seconded bp Gra�e�e'Lyuch, to adjourt� :tfle •�r.19i6 neeLing af tge Humaar 8eso�i�tcas Gommission at- ��.�. Upna 8 Vfl�.CB �ote, all vat#�p� �ge, the motion carr.ied �i�3�F�)g, e�'`f'i��iy _suhinit�e�d, � � � t'� . ��z�its ager 'g 3esretafy ; � °' . , � � � , ��; x � . - ' . ,� �. . z ,� - 5� :3"� .� . �. . . � . . - _ �`��^ .. . .. .. .- . ... . . - ' �. . . �. . . .. . . . . . ��`� . _ _ ' _ _ . ' . .' � f,' - _ . .. .. _ `4,:�. . - . .. _ .._ . % "_. � ,'. . . , � . . 4.'+' :< -,, J .. . ._ ._. .. . .�. �. � "1^� -....�- � - � . . � �' . . . . � . . . __ . . , r -. . . . � . .: � � � . . � . . . - . . . . . .... , . � . . �� ':. - � � - � . � - � . . � ;".r.�.°r ' - . . . : .�' ,� � � ..« � � � � ���v�. - - - . . `T � - . � � .. ; . . ... �... �-. ; ;.- �_ ; > 'f.- .. - � . - . � . � . . . � .� �-. � . . . . . . �. .. . . � . . � r, _ ���:_ �£ -= , r '`r r�fiP' , v' '�Y y � r � '� ✓ � . k. i= ii'§�, t<. `z i t, •�. �� . � � �'� �. r � ��.. „ , �' � 3 � � ;� s x � .. � �; � n�x�=:� : � � c ���� '� � t �`<�^" � : :�� � �,�� �, -: � �' Y � y < rT�. Y.. .�"S �,.�K . ! :".. 2av� t � 6': $ , . � ; ='a � .u� .' � � 6, :'� '' ':i x � t� t � � .� � " �� ��.� � � " � � ��� `� � ,f`A i k r3 ! ��; 5�y,�%. J d + S '�i'� � '' � °�j � "��3 � ✓ 2 . uYA 2 � i. ,�, �� .� yu :: . . _ . _.,_.� _ �._ . 5 : ,,... ..� . , M%-_..:. ..._..%e d..:. �"�. � ;? F � y �a�; £� � -, c �� ��, :,: a'. - �� _ t ��, 4 "F �e ? r� , - S. . � ¢. v , " r ze P ' 3� � � i.�+ � :� a a ��� , g ti` 1 k� y � �i � �1«=` �; 1 � < > �.�, �. �� t ! } ' i ' � � = . i � i ..� . � � � . . [_ � i ,. a' �w� � .x' � ' � ., .gt. a t�.. i�° :: �: . � r�� _ ._� . i . � _ L .. . The Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meetiny of Fek.�ruary 10. 1976 Page 2 nicer home. He said he would be willing to wor.k with the neighbors to resolve any `�3 problems before building. Mrs. Parr asked what happens if this house causes drainage problems after it is built. Mr. Yesnes �aid hc- has to work with the City Engineering Department on the drainage so he didn't feel there would be a drainage � problem. Mrs. Parr said she was under the impression Y,hat a SO foot lot could not be built on and that was tihy they have kept up thi.s lot. Chairwoman Wahl.berg said Mr. Yesnes is within his legal right to build on this 50 foot lot and he has said he would work with the neighbors to try and resolve any objections or problems with them before building. Mr. Oetterer said his only objection with the detached gara9e is with the driveway having to go around the house where a drainage problem might be created. Mr. Plemel asked Mr. Yesnes if he has owned Chis lot for a long time. Mr. Yesnes replied that this was a tax forfeit lot that t}�ey have just purchased. He added that he did not know the history of the lot. Mrs. Yarr said there are two cesspools on the loC that they have covered over with dirt to make grass grow. Mr�. Oetterer said the cesspools are from his address and were :nstalled in about 1954.He added he also has a cesspool in his yard. Chairwoman Wahlbe.r< asked the neighbors i.f +:.hry ;lad any further objections if Mr. Yesnes was willing to work with them on tlie drainage problem. Mr. Oetterer said there �could be nothing else they could objcct to. MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Gabel, to close t;e public hearing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. Mrs. Gabel st.ated Mr. Yesnes does have a:e<sat •=icl,r_ to build - the que�tion is whether there is going to be a detached or a.tt-aci.ed ?arage. She said to have a detac,yed yar.age �would al.]:oo: h:m to bui.78 ::�� m: rc a.t*rar_Yi.ve home that cvcul3� a3d � Co iY.e ne..ghi�orhood. .rs. Pl�r,el said he .+^r��ed -a��!i o�oi�.ld a3d that Mr. Yesnes has agreed to work with the neighbors. MOTION by Plemel, second.ed by Gabel, to e. -.. .. =�le re��e'�t to xaive the requirement of a single attached garage and to a11ow =�'.. - de±:ache& qzrage to be buil* instead. Upon a voice vote, there being no n�ys, +:.._ . r: ca�sie3. Chairwoman Wahlberg asked Mr. Mattson =.f _ ;ioc:;; f:rom t.he neighb�rs constituted a formal objection where this request woaJr: i.r.�:- ::c go t:� the City Council through the Planning Cemmission_ Mr. Mattson Le�.c :z.-,;•.., .,... :�s,r�s was wi.11inq 1.o work witn tl�em or. resolving any future problems, ±:i�::;.�. ,..-... ...: have to conti.nue to the Council. z ��;�prcm £OR VARId1tdCES OF THE FRT.DT'Y � � !�.i I7�ti5: �ECTION 20i.053, 1B� -�._ _=.. � _�.---'--- ` . _. — ' — iG 22I:DU!'� 'iht; LOT AR,'3A RE9JIP.ED, FOIt , �:_: � ���� -' ��� 77 D� C�. P�BER 29, 1955, -�k'ROM � �'7GO.SnzUl.�?. F'^ET TC 5213 S^^nn.� i'EFT F,c,' ._....� �,. � .'� ��'�3, 2T?, TO RP�DUCF TEtF LOT 'viID'Pki I11�1t1ZRi]D Ff'R A i^T �5C0 �DPD °21 � 797�, i.:OM� 90 FEF`C TO� 40 PFRT, . . . ____ . __. _ .-._._ ---- -. . _ . . _.. . __—.� -- -- '-- S. �`?`Z^-?: 205.053 , 3� >O rNCFFPo,? n y: �. .�.,, ,� �� ry itrnq� .P: FSY T_HE f?�.7.N B�7IL�JING _ .N ! ----------. � ._.:_ .... . ._,._-----.�__«...-_-- AND AL3, AC'Ci'3SOI'.�' BUSLll7N�� FROhi 25 ?�' �. �. . ." � tC"'-Nt� Alv?l, SECTSti�l 2G5.053� . 4B, TO F�I �x':; T:�.JP'. SI.7I' YARll AU30ININC� ' � �� � ll�l:: Iv:y?i.iSR.CD 1(i t:i;>T 7'!? 5 FIiBT, - -.__. -�-�.�_ _ '..:.. .. � AND� SfC "IC:27 JQ5.053� 413� .�iB�_ TO R;i.'i.iU,'_ _. .:. ... .�:� :N Ai ��dI:D C�P.?-�GE: 1'F1A'P OPiNS r��.0 l:?} �gTDF:. SPR:E;T OF e� CQL'.;]EK . . � . .'.�J7',zED 25 FLFT�' 1_3 rEET, Aid6, -.-�'- - ._._.-'-_-- ---- -,. - ' � :'-..-. .� —�-- � SECTIO�� G05.053� 4P� En.� `CO RF.DU('F.' CH?� �� ��n 1'R�h1 7I�-.; �flDi SI��LT O'r FA� � � CORNIiR LO`1' Pi:OM ].7:5 1 F'Ei' TO 1.1 L'EE9'� � � � �.CT.:; I UC'l`IC'.Q -7F �"tSQ ���3 AN➢: .. ----��___ _�.._.. . -_--- - � � . . . . .-- ' _-._ . - ._.- ._.- A7'TACNi D C'ARA61 �O ,3E LO�'��T:D �N LOT �`� � )Ui'. n��1PZ0!� "� � 1.. BLING - -- - —' ' - -- � ` ---'� 4800 - 7-i � Slid I P N 1. PRfPI,i�.l DiN. F' �, � �. MR r�t N7� L � 1.v}�LL71 7657. CENTFAL BVGNOi, N.6. FRiDLL`l� P1N. 5S�1.i. - '_� - -- The Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of February 10, 1976 Page 3 MOTION by Pler.iel, seconded by Gabel, to open the public hearing. Upon a voice vote �`3 there being no nays, the motion carriefl. ; �Mr. Denis L. Villella was present to pr.esent his request. A sketch of the lot and a proposed house plan wer_e shown to the Board, ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVICED BY REQUIREMENTS: 1. Section 205.053, 1B, I.ot area requirement of 7500 square feet 2. Section 204.053, 2B, Lot width of not less than 50 feet �� Public purpose served by these two sections is to avoid the condition of over crowding of the residential neig!,borhood. Also to avoid excess burden on the existing water and sewer aervices. 3. Section 205.053, 3, Lot coveraRe requirement of 25 percent Provide necessa� � out�ide spac^s co be esed for green areas which add to the attractabiliY.y �: the neigt;bornno�. It also provides needed spaces for the mental we].1 beinc o� tisn �an;ii�, 9. Sectior. 2C5.053, 4b, Side ya.rd setback adjoining living area of 10 feet Proviiaes space between individual structures so as to guard against radiant heat which would spread a iire ':��� one structure to another. It also provides sufficient access into t�e rear �.:�r3 for emergency purposes. It also reduces the condition of o✓ercro�•�din:_ �_ :he residential neighborhood. 5. Sect.ion �04.053, 4�; .;'" Corye-- lot side yard setback of 25 feet for an attached garage r � To allevr for oii strec-': ' -k_`..:; ��:.thout encroaching on the public right of way. Also the aes:hetic conr •.._- on of the neighborhood to reduce the building line of site er,croaci;::�;.� .._.,_._ -.._ ... �lhbors front yard. � 6. SecYion 205.G:;3, �;:,. _ - lot side yard setback of 17.5 feet for living area� of stra� ���:c Maintain hiy .e:: 3�:�_.-. r- ,�.. �_�_L. ir --�_sability and reduce the line of site encroachmznt ir.t�+ {_;�e .._ -_:.bo: s - - ,r,t yard. By\STATEP_ HAFI?SHIP: I.,;'� 3.. _.;;li:.?-�:-�';l.e without the listed variances. t � C.� ADMINISTRATNE : "�-',t�P '._.. __ . .._ ___� a;�e some very � important points that need � to � � � � be brouqht out in co::sir!.^_-,_;_,. �_s request; l. Ti�e pro�.erty :_.� i..:'. -..... .� :.�_ the Eirst 40 foot lot built on in the City and arould est�bl'._,:i '_�._ , _.. ,� iollowed on all other 40 foot lots. 2. The property ��.i.re�:c_, -Je. :s��rth o£ this 40 foot lot is under the same. ownership. Tizis __.., : n. �_.. .__ _ .s yarchased by present owner in 1973. 3. Tn a speci .] : ln�-n�.n. C�,;r�:' :;tudy in 1971 all 40 foot lots were looked • at to see it �.��•}� � .,._. r ,_... :ehis lot was listed as a bui2dable lot with tiie necessarv � �. 4. Tne size of t,..:,:� , .,� �-`duced an3 still remain within the Code l;mitation. . . . . . . . The Minutes of the A:�peals Commission Meeting of February 10, 1976 Pa e 4 •? = WiCh these points in mind, the City sta£f position is as follows: A. We feel that the best solution would be to request that the owner absorb this property into the ownership of the property to the north as one. B. If the owner would still like to request the variances to allow for a � buildable lot than he should; 1. Split off at least 5 feet from the property to the north so as to meet as many of the Code iequirements as possible. This would eliminate variance #4 and #3. 2. The size oi the house should be reduced by 4 feet and the garage entrance should be on the west of the structure allowing encroachment on his portion of the unused alley. This would elimi.nate variance #5. 3. This request should go through the normal process for variance requests in that this will set the policy for development on other 40 foot lots. h1s. Villella said this is a corner let that is 40 feet wide by 130 feet deep, He said they plan to put the house lengthwise o.i the lot with a 35 foot setbact; from 2'� Street and a ll foot setback from 48th Str.eet which the garage will exit onto. He said there would be a 5 foot si.de yard setback from the north property line and a 33.46 r.ear yard. Ae said there would be plenty of room around the house and the neiqhbor to the north has no objections as he is the man�who is selling this lot, and he also said he knew of no objectior.s Erom other neighbors. M�:. Plemel as:�ed i£ he would be living in this house and Mr. Villella answered he wouid be l;avi.ng it built to sell. Ms. Ville.la added Jim Lund weuld be thr� cont-ractor. k;e said the liouse would be a split foyer, 3'.�edrooia (2 up a:cd 1 dow;i) I'fs? �.;?;nroaed � h:,:,iu. D'u . Villella said for the coverage, tl,ey ceuld build a si.nglc gai:age l�ut a doub.l_e yarage is more desireable. Chairwn:nan Wahlberg read L-he "6lxide Lines POY TAYR Substandard in Size" from the � D�ce�rnber 8, 1971�P1anning�Commission minutes and the suggesti_en�from these.minutes� � for fhis 1ot was to "Consider allowi.rag a sinqle story, sma1L house with a 5�oot side yard to trie north. The house to fit in with the neighborinq structures."° Mr. Vi.ZJ.e11a sai_d a single story houe� could not be a ver.y decent s.ize hcuse wi_thoui. mo?_e coverage. Cn:: �.rv;cman tVahlberg also read an excerpb Erom. the Council x�inutes of the Aori.l 17, ] 37� uieer.;_�Yq concerning�forty.foot lots in Fridley� This excerpt read, "Mayor Lieb:t sa.i.c3 Lha�� '?ridley still has some 40 foo-� lets .Leit w�developed and ii �nyane shoul3 shoy; :;.n ;.ntere�st in purchasing them, he would li}:e to have a po].icy already fa:.ims}atzd t,�at would be fair' and impartia]� to� all. The ?ir,��::n.:�:�:•ri_ng� Assist�nt pointed ou`. tha� Ia_�e. DecembcL �he Pianning Commi.ssion ma.72 a rec:�orivaendar_ion on the use of. some o1: t:ie 49 foci: lui_s in ;7�_yrnoui:: Ad3ii:ioa_ . The. _ cNn;�,:c ... blan;c�L- �policy p�r �use �or:- ril.?: 40 �. � +`ooL lo+�s becaus��-s�me of them are in the ini-.�:�..r.;.or of a b].or.!; and seme are on a cor:icr � r;:+e:ce� if thev� wez-e bui.l* upon,� they wou1.3 ;:reat�; a traffic hazar.d. � Mayor Lieh2 srs:.l that. over the past five years, he has receS.v 3 c,_lls from }:�auple having 4Q focc ir�,•,: and i-hc,� wen<3er,ed what: they slr,iuld do witt; t�-.-rm, F:cr said-he t-muid�li.ke to see ever�• lrr� � utilized ai,d on i:he� tax rolls. He urg x�.'.�:�-: "'�:c'Zninq Cor.un5.s:;ion to rontir.ue wor':in�': � on some so?rt of a��licy." Chairwoman CG. �,rq a�;l �d I✓ir. Mattson if the P2anning Comroicsi_vn yad evcr c�mgleT.ed a policy c», -4ii fc;:�L '.o*_s. Mr. Matr_,;on said thak t:n:_,' i;,��.3 not come up wi:h �a �wlicy to hia };n^;.:�.eb,;�,.. . . . . - .. � .._ -� ..,.,,� .� The Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of February 10, 1976 Page 5 Mrs. Gabel asked if a purchase agreement for this lot had been signed already and '�'� Mr. Villella said that it had. �Chairwoman Wahlberg said point #1 from the staff review is for the owner to absorb this lot into 1 building site with his lots to the north but this cannot be done '� as he had already sold it. She said point #2 was for the owner to split off 5 feet from his other lots to add to this lot but since there are two separate owners this also cannot be done. She asked if there would be a di�ferent house plan that could be used to eliminate some of the variances. Mr. villella said he could use a difkerent plan but most plans have a 24 foot wide house and he felt this plan seemed the best to hi.m. He added that this split foyer needs 768 square Eeet in each level whereas a rambler would need a minimum of 1020 square feet of floor area. Mrs. Gabel asked what the selling price of this home would be and Mr. Villella said it would be around $36,000. He felt this price range for houses was in great demand. Mr. Plemel said he questioned where the hardship was. He said he could see a hardship if the owrier was going to build on the lot and had split off some of his other land to go with it but �e could not see a hardship with an investor buying the lot to build a home for �=:lling. Mr. Villella said a lot of the other suburbs are running into smaller lots being built on now because of the need for housing and the expense of large lots. He said this being a corner lot will give the appearance of more open area rather than building on a 40 foot inside lot, and he felt a new house on this corner would add aesthetically to the neighborhood. Chairwos�an Wahlberg asked Mr. Villella if he would be agreeable to changing the �entsance of the garage to be from the west (alley) instead of from the south which would zliminate cariance #5. Mr. Villella said he could certainly change that. Mr. M.at��on added there are fairly large boulevards in this area (12 feet) and there shouldn't be any sidewalks put in. Chairwoman Wahlberg noted that variance #6 for an 11 foot side yard would actually have the house set back 23 feet from the curb. Mrs. Gabel_ asked if the purchase agreement for this lot was contingent upon the varianc:s beinc; apnroved. Mr. Villilla said it oras. MOTIOtd by F1em�?., seconded by Gabel, to close the public liearing. _Upon a voice vote, there b.-i�;c, no nays, the motion carried. -- �� Mrs. Gabel =_ ;, she had a fear of setting a precedent on 40 foot lots even though . the lots ;avulci be loo;ced ai individually. She said this is a corner lot, and it does hav�=�c. 71 foot boulevard, and there is no change o€ sidewalks going in, but she qu.ea�_ioned :.f apnroving the building of this house wou2d be creating a bad image. � Chairwo��.,:i Idr-:'.�'_ierg aske3 if there was any esti-nate on the number of vacant 40 foot lots in. t:��.; C-.�;� ar.d F+r. t;attson replied that he did not know the exact number. Mr. Nat`.co*, �rid the acti.on taken on the variances for these lots would depend on whethe�: th�, Cit�� waated �hese locs on the tax roils and if the scrimping was worth ik. The Minutes of thc :',_,peals Commission Meeting of Febr.uar�10, 1976 Page 6 �t�. Plemel said he is not necessarily in favor of 120 foot lots but he is not fond of 40 foot lots either. Chairwoman Wahlberg said she would like to hear from the Planning Commission and the various other subcommittees as to their opinion of Luilding on 40 foot lots and how this would fit into the City plan. She said due to the fact that there were so `� many var.iance reauests made to build on this lot, thz Board would be shooting in the dark to act on this. She felt this should be reviewe3 to �etermine how many of these lots were in the City. bir.� Dlattson noted that it was implied i.n Mr. Liebl's statement that there were a number of them. Chairwoman Wahlberg noted that in the Comprehensive Housing Plan for low and moderate housing it suggests using scattered housing and this could be where this lot. could be used. She said she would like to table acting on this item until the Board could get the comments from the various commissions. Chairwoman Wahlberg asked if Mr. Villella would mind waiting approxiunately 6 weeks to 2 months to get final action on this request. Mr. Villeila said they l�ad no specific date in mind to start construction so h� would agree with tabling the request. 240TION by Gabel, seconded by Plemel, to table this request until. the opinion of tiie Plar.ning Commission and the various other commissions can be obtained on builaing on fo�ty ioot lots. Dpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carr.5.ed. It was noted that these comments should be returned to the Soard as quickly a_. possible to avoid holding up the petitioner more than necessary. Mr. Plemel stated with the smaller families, a smaller house coul3 be b•�i.lt on tnis ].ot and still be utilized. � 3. A RE UEST�FOR VARIANCES OF THE FRIDLEY SIGN ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS: SEC'P1GN 2'.4.042, 5, ^ � TO REDUCE THS� DISTANCS BETWEEN AN ADVERTISING SIGN AND A STREET IN':'.'ER:'�Ei]PiJiv_ FROId 500 FEET TO 50 FEET, AND SSCTIO.I 214.042, 6, TO REDUCE THE UISTANCE�Bli'T".J:3L':S AN ADVERTISIHG SIGIQ AND A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FROM 5U0 FEET TO 38Q ���-F?`�- 1,.;:.L� `_"O AL7�Sd TkiE CONS7'u1JC'.CIOA? OF A 10 E'OOT�SY 30 FOOT ADVGRTISING SIGid (BIi�L130A't: v i3F.IC;C.ATP,D ON I,OT 9, �f3LOCK� 1, GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL CE�NL.F:R. THE SAi� I3E1�::E `�l0 P� ,>1' RIVEk ROAD N.E., E'F.IDLEY, MINL7ESOTA. _(REQOEST BY PLY{tT00D IdTNNPSOTA INC'.,_ __ 'tSVEY, MOTTON by Plemel, seconded by Gabe1, to open the public hearii:g. ....•, _..,:.ca vote, there being no nays, the�motion carried. � Mr. Eugene Hunt was present to present the requeet. ADhfINISTRAT2VE REPORT A. PliBLIC PURPOSE SERV�D AY REQUIREMENT: 1. Section 214.042, 5, Distance requirement oi SOG feet i:: ,:.._. �::ctior. R'o reduce distra.ction from possible traffic congestion are�. 2. Section 214.042, 6, Distance requirement �f 500 f.eet co � ,-,�r.r To protect the aesthetic quality of the resi�9ential nei�tl•!_o � The Minutes of the A eals Commission Meetin of Februar 10, 1976 Pa e 7 B. STATED FiARUSH2P: Only entran�e into Wicks and Plywood Minnesota and could cause traffic problems by person trying to retrace their steps once past the entrance. � C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: We feel that this hardship has some merit to it and could cause some traffic problems because of a missed entrance. The following conditions should be required with the granting of the variance. 1. There will be no other billboards allowed on this plat. 2. That the owner of the sign would be required to r�nove the sign within 60 days of the issuance of a building permit for the property on which it is located. Mr. iixnt said they are looking to put up an entrance sign that Plywood Minnesota and Wicks klxrniture will share. He said Wicks has a sign in approximately the same location that will come down when the new sign is put up. He said they have a problem in that they are the only retail businesses in this area and it is very difficult for the people to find them as the addresses are on East River Road. He said triey have had many complaints from customers who have gone by the entrance and then have had :o find their way back to the entrance. Chairwoman Wahlberg asked what tl;z size of the sign was that is existing. Mr. Hunt said the present sign is a 8' x 12' double face sign and the new sign will be two 10' x 15' panels coming tocether to form a"V" so the sign will be able to be read from both north and south. Mrs. Gabel asked how high the sign tiould be and Mr. Hunt answered it would be 20 feet whereas the Code requirement is a maximum of 25 feet. � Chairwoman Wahlberg asked where the residential area was in this area and Mr. Mattson said it was across East River Road. He added there are no houses there buL- it is zoned R-1. Chairwoman Wahlberg asked what the sian would be made of and Mr. Hunt said they would like to construct it out of ylywood and have exterior lighting. He said the Code does say the sigr should be all metal but he felt since the sign was in essence just z tenper.ary sign, since it would have to come down if the property was developed, that they wouldi:'c ?ine to put all that money into it. Mr. Mattson said it coula be a hardship to force thc� to use all steel construction when the sign miyht have to come decan at an�• cime. Chairwoman Wahl.bery said tt�� stafi ;.as recommended that if this request is approved, that nu �ther bill.boards be allowed on this property and that this sign wcald have to Ue removed 60 days a.�.°�r ttie property is developed. MOTION by Pl�mel, seconded 'cy Ga�el, io close thc pub].ic hearing. Upon a voice vote, there beiny no nays, tie m�tiun carried. Ns. Pl�mel said he would be in fa�; r of the request for the reasons that were s±ated and Mrs. Gabel agreed. MtiTION by Gabel, seccnded by P].eme�, t-o recommend approval of the variances with the�stipul3.tions that, L:l9:ere •�..:_i be no other billboards allowed on this pronrr_t��. �2. That tlie sigr, would be removed -SU days after the property is developed. Upon a voica vote, chere i�,i.na �,o ,:; ��s, i;he motion carried. �9 The t9inutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of February 10, 1976 Page 8 4. ITEMS REF�RRIs'D TO THE COMMISSION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Chairwoman Wahlberg said the Comprehensive Housing P1an was approved by the � Planning Commission at their January 21st meeting. She said the new book is in a better form and it is indexed much better with the maps more readable, but that it is basically the same as before. She said there was a member from the Metro Council at the Planninq Commission meeting who talked about the different plans available for fund s,and she said she had copies of the minutes of that meeting and a copy of the new Plan that the fioard members could go over if they wanted to. Chairwoman Wahlberg said at this same meeting there was a presentation made by a member of the Youth in Favor of a Youth Teen Center Committee asking for permission to use the downstairs of the Civic Center as a Teen Center. She said a written proposal for this was given to the Planninq Commission which the Board members have a copy of, and the Planninq Commission would like the Board to review it and refer their comments back to the Planning Commissior.. The Board discussed the need for a teen center in Fridley but questioned whe+her City Hall would be the correct locatior. for it. Chairwoman Wahlberg said the Board members should read over this proposal and be prepared to discuss it at the next meeting. Mrs. Gahel said the next scheduled meeting for the Appeals Commission is set for February 24, 1976 which is also the DFL and GOP cavcus night, so she felt tne Appeals meeting should be deferred to another night if any items come in. The Board agreed to defer the meeting to another date if any i.tems are submitted. � Ciiairwoman Wahlberg informed the Board that Bill Drigar.s resigned as Chairman of the Board and it would be necessary to elect a new chairman to fill out the :....i unt�.l April 1, 1976. The Board agzeed to defer this item unY.il the next meeting so that ail the me.�nbers could be present. hDJOi)PNi�IENT: ':he r�iae:ting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. by Actr.ng Chairc,oman S�ahlberg. It�.-�:�.;���cctfully submitted, ``�f�_r�%tCA � t rt:",R`I 1i.NT� ^,�,�,..�,t�ry • � OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PU6LIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO IJHQM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there 4ti�i11 6e a Aublic Hear9ng by the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Halt at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, February 18, 1976 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chamber to consider the following matter: A request for a Special Use Permit, SP #76-01, by Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company, to allow the construction of a 25 foot by 12 foot billboard in M-2 zoning (heavy industrial areas), per Fridley City Code, Section 214.042, located on Parcei 5400 in the South Half of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. � Generally located at 8000 University Avenue N.E. � Anyone wishing to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meetiny. Publish: Fehruary 4, 1976 February 11, 1976 � RTCHARD H. HARRIS CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMMISSION �� � • � p u v ,r �. � �l$� S3�o'�i1�' ��� �1 � , � � � ----- COMwUM1TY DEVILCI°MEHT ��V. � L' � r � � rnnracrrvs :xsalcnav cxar. 1 � ��__� � �IT' N?L� �►�Dl4Y BS@3 k"'"� � �,j 612'Bb0'3ri0 . , w 1�' d, �� O � ADVERTISING SIGN SPECII#L USE PERMIT }1PPLICATION Owner Address VACCb'�/� CrUr�1"i' /1"G�et=%�> .,�. rc 17C^_ E.rector A ress c .>/�-IV� i'- - Legal T,ot No. Black No. Tract or Additi.on Desc. �.q�'c�.0 5��/�� Owner of Progerty Address „s� ���n � �c� �_�,.h -�'. r�,ri,,;:� �� �_ +�Tr•_s Lease Date Renewal Date Expixatioa Date �Ti%t�-' `% i 7<- '�1� `i i � a -ykn; ,`!. �Tk-C-� ...._ Year Built Cost/Value Dimensions: �y�� Length: ,��`- elg . uctura 2sc: & umina ion: �S � �� ,r,r�n� c- �,.�.r �1 T �cf,a Phone %(- (, - :�3'.� f Width: �� Sq. Ft. :?�c c• Distanc° To Nearest Sign: Setback Fr. Street R/W Lines: _, �� :.-_'r��/� `(�� � N , j'�.c" 7'7. (= :`4 ��.+ds-s'=� - � /' i : Distance�Fr. Street Inter.: Distance Fr. R-1 Uses: _ (: ' ' -j.I�r-1 C"D�y C,i i4',}7f=k' %1„4":; -j ���;T G c%/tTtc L - - - Location Diagram: zONEI� M-?. _ rw cwmor � 5(C1 � I I �N��if �� �� i i� ; i! � li �I n � �� �.. � � (£HE —7--- i r = ? .�' � -- -- --- :q G : A � L ,°� _' —"� ¢ > H> ie d f : � w_ � 6 . ¢ . � r p o ,. .,. r . ;:. H �ftl�.� !�.G : � �b 3 `�'. 1� �S � � t _� � 1 : /= : S y . ..._.i _—__-�-- I . �a � n X _ . r_,�F x ro.S__ < , ��_._ � �_,i . , � ,s_�_��.-�:�_ '9��FH-- —_.__._7' zl��.. h.`w✓amiv..rr.i.♦ I�tI . . _��.���..��.2 fT 1' � SP # 76-01 Sign Location: 8000 University Avenue N.E. � Owner: Naegele Ouidoor Advertising Company SIGN INFORMATION :. �eight (25'} 25' 2. Area (3Q0) Meets Code (300 square feet) 3. Distance Between Signs {500'} Exceeds 500' 4., Setback From Street Right-of-way Lines (3U') 30' 5. Distance From Street Intersection (5CQ') Greater than 500' 6. Distance from R-1 Uses (500'} Greater than 500' 7. Condition Status (All Metal) Metal and Fluorescent 8. Zoning (C-2S, M-1, M-2) M-2 � � ' * Non-Conforming to existing ardin�nce , / ** nbn-Conf�rming to zoning requ�reme�ts ( y� �`# Variance applied for , � � � . OFfICIP,L �OTICL CITY OF FRIDLEY PUQLIC HEARIidG [iE�ORE TIIE PLANiIIWG COi4t•iISSIO; TO lJHO�f IT MAY CONCERI7: Not�ice is hereby given that there t-:ill�be a Public Hearing by the Plamiing Com!nision of the City oi Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 Ui2iversity kvenue t;ortheasc on t;ednesda,y, February ]8, 1976 at 7:30 P.tt. in the Council Chamber to considei• the fol1oYiing matter: A request for- a Special Use Permit, SP n7G-02, by Pl�hvood hiint}eso±�, Tnc., i.o construc� a 10 f�at by 30 foot bi-llboard in h1-2 Zoning (heavy indus�rial areasj, to ci2signai:: the entrance to Pl,y:vood t-1ir,ne�ota and 41�ckes. This billboard will replace existing non-confor�ning signs, per Fridley City Co�e, SecticR 214.0�2, located on Lot 9, Block l, Great horthern Ind.�strial Cer�i;er, all lying in the Soutli Nalf of Section 22, T-•30, � R-24, Cii:y of Pridle��, County of Asioka., Minn�sota. Generally located at 5301 Easi I:iver P.oad N.E. Anyone t�rishing to be heard in reference to the abave matter tvill be heard at this meet�ing. Publish: February 4, 1976 Februar-Y 11. 1976 , � RIChARD H. HARRiS CFii+I RFiAts PL;iflfdING COhiMISSIOP! �� � CITY 01� PR7DI,GY D97NNCS0'1'A PLANNI�G AND ZONING POR;•1 NUPfI31iR`� �(]fi_�9 APPLICAN'f'S SIGNA'1'URG Plywood Mirnesota _ Address 540T East River Road N.E. Telephone Number 571-6100 PNOPLRTY OIV�L.R'S SIGN�'CURTi Burlington Northern Railroad Address Telcphone �waber Street Locatio;i of Property di � TYPH OP RI:QUBS1' Rezoning X Speci.al Usc Permit Approval of Premin- inary G Final Plat Streets or Alley Vacations Otlier Fee �� Receipt I�`o �� fi�.__ Legal Descri.ption of Property Lot 9 Rlork 1 G *�� +tiPrn Tnriiictria]�}�� Prescnt Zoning Classification M-2 Existing Use of Property_ yacant Acreage of Property Describe briefly the proposed zoning classifica�ion or type of use�and improvement proposed construct a new bi7lbaard ta be used as an entrance sign for Plywood Minnesota and Wickes replace wooden siqn _ .Ilas thc present applicant previeusly sou�ht to rezone, plat, oUtain a iot splii. or variance or special usc perr.iit on the subject site or part of it? yes no. 1Viiat was reqtiested and i��hen? - � The undcrsigned m�derstands that: (a) a list of all residents and o�aners of property within 300 feet (350 feet for rezoning) r��ust Ue attached to this applicrtion. (b) '17�is application must be signed by all o�,mers of the property, or an explanation given ti��hy this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proc��edinos resulting from the failurc to list the names and addresses of all resi.dents and property o���ners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn ancl attached, s;to++�ing the follnz�in�;: l. North Dircction. 2. I.ocation of.proposcd structurc en thc lot. 3. Dimcnsions of property, proposed structurc, and front ar.d sidc setUacl;s. 4. Street I�ames. S, Location and use of adjacent esistino Uuildings (within s"00 feet) '{1ic undersi�ned hereUy declares that all the facts and representations stated i» t:liis npplicatior are true aiid correct. DATI: n:�c� r•ii�a S I GN ATLIRii � (nPPL1CAN'1') Eugene Hunt Date of Ilcari 1'l�nning Coiumi.ssioiz Approvcd (dntcs) Dcnicd City Council AI���rovccl (datcs) 1lcnic�l_ -.- ..� .: SO #76-02, Ptywood Mn Planning Commission 2-3-76 Mailing List � Burlington Northern 176 East 5th Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 GTE Sylvania , Inc. 5330 Industrial Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Wicks furniture 560i East River Road ti.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Plywood Minnesota 5401 East River Road N.E. Fridley, f�in 55421 CJ i �S 1 , � ., J I `a . �i o f •� $ �a �► .I �� _1 � _ ' b • �. .SE f I � r. �il`° r� I �, , ! ! � ,,� � 'r ,. � ' _ �� \ �, SP #76-02 Piywood Minnesota ' �� � � �1 � �z 2�. .80 FSE � .�`� . � � ��� ���- � r� �acl�.a�s, , r_ ���� � , ��i1��ST-'� � �° �' � � �� � � � � � i` �' � � � , _i = � � : 0 �'� � I; U ' �.__ 1 t - �� �' � � . �__� ` . � � ��.. � °8'r�s-- •e� '�_ '� �� � x � : \ M �Qti` '�qh o - �!' .. � � o ' �r� ; y'r �_ o-�_.' J� �'6 ` ' q j��; . � � V . . . � e'O� 't-, tioS : _ : w.. � 1�;' lv�. yj�. . � ti+ . '�.\ t� . � � . / . a ♦ � � M � U � �% . �r.,�a . . r�'°�. . � . Q � `t, ; 1 . (I . _ - _ �3�. � �� o• � �� . • � � � _J �a' °f � �� Q.; � � . � ?� ,� r � \\ . '� ,�.. •:; � � i ��, r D : '� ,, _, �_ r � �. 32q --�. ` , ; ' � �r f �--�� � / . r � '� f � . �; � rl ` .. ., �� � � � � �; , �� �� '�l `' . �:% �, .� �� / „ f _ �� , ,� xs � \ \ 1 ' , ��\ �- ; � y �' ` ti \ 4� ' � I . � � = .� n ) ( n � \ . Ob . �`.�`;� ' j1.i� �a1 " •N �\ i � 47 / , �I � � ., ,: .s 1 G �,,�,'� ' , � �, � _ :'i. : � � , , ,.': t �� � ,,; �.; � � � w � � ' �;� ��� ��'� � i '� i n.' .j,�?. ' � .� :- .� ;� � � , ,�, . , .. . ,/ ; ; �.. � „/ ,,.. . ���. . \ �4���" �' F. 4-) � � ..- . . . . . _ 4 . '�i 1 , ► �' t _} _. i � ! ! /'�'�'"l . ` . . ;�_ . --, : _ : �, C� J � . SP #76-02, Plywood Minnesota 0 �� �`���`�r���- a ���� €�€������� . ����� , _.. ! Nf�fi{C3.>5t]7s3�tE'�i.. . r� . • h � � e � �-t �- a i F t _ SP �t 76-02 Sign Location: 5301 East River Road N.E. � Owner: Plywood Minnesota, Inc. SIGN INFORMATI�N 1. Height (25' ) �`' 2. Area (300) 300 syuare feet (2) 10' x 15' signs 3. Distance Between Signs ;500') over 5G0' 4. Setback From Stree± Right-of•-way Lines (30') 50' #*5. Distance From Street Intersecticn (5�0') 50' __ #*6. Distance from R-1 Uses (500') 3£�J' 7. Condition Status (All Metal) Metal 8. Zoning (C-2S, M-1, M-2} M-2 , . * Non-Confiorming to existing ordinance ** Non-Conforming to zoning requirements # Uariance applied for . .?� �rm �f�e I�OT Sf'LIT APPI..ICRTIO���� , ' C1TY OF FRIDLEY APPLICAh'T: � o.vse:��on �E� �orv�.+�ti�E-� C_.r���.'.i' ADDRPSS: %r� � if%�n'H �i Cn ��- �-'i�s. 5"y?/� / StroeC City Zip Code TELEPHOI'� /{ j -%6�'—ri7 S _:� -Hetm�- Burtinesa I�HOPPRTY Ok:t�;{S� ��z„t :t� ��-`:y �— ADDRLSS( �S �'�9 appilcunL�s n�.me Lot Split ]� � (. �� - Date Filed: Fee:;�a°=� Receipt �E' /S�/`� Council liction:llate xB�u.�.�.s: ati.ree�; ✓� t;ity :;ip l;o3e Street j City Zip Code TFS,EPIIOi�TE �( S �_ � —� Home .�...r.�..��...��..�_�. � Propertyr I,occtior. on Street � # or Exact Street t�ddre�e (ZF �srY) Worth of Osborne Road, West of the � � ��:R=-,�.�.,.�.s.� Produce Ranch. � Legr�1 Deuc.ripticn of Fron�rty: p Parcel 3790, in South Half of Seciion 11 Reason Por Lot Split: Location of fence for Frank's N�rs rv x'resent cation The underai�ed herei�y declsxes t.t�at all the fa.cts attd . £ r.epresentationc stated in this applic�tion a.re true and � correct. DATE:�(^.S�i/�7(�� SIGP.�1TiIl2� �_���S,r�c>�--� E /-' RPLOW POS��,�C77'Y IISE OIi'�i (Se�r}✓leveris csid� for a3ditional in9t.rLCtio;ia} PLATS & SUPS; Dnte of Con�ider�tion - Hec:t�.z•ke : . • PLANhIliG COh��[1SSZU:l: Dste oS Con:�islcrntion - Itemc:,ricrs � CI`17 COL!idCiL: DEite of Cont�idero cioa - }teu+.c.rkcs : �� L.S. #76-01, Consolidated Container Gorporation. Split off appr•oximate 120' of the C.Y�I<'�;,' J Eusi side of Parcel 3140 .Sf_� C o';" " s ; , � , � 1 � �� -. . � . ..._. ... ._ _o-:. .'_' "'_' . ". ��... .._.... ,-(• _ . . . . ' . . c �r ,. +' . "i Jr . . . � r� . � _ � � � i - . . __ — ' _ t . Ik t � /� ! � � .r _ __ _ ... .- - -- .I.. � ; r)o' . . J / � f�} � . r{�ryt l � �/i � , - vr � ��l . I � � t i.� � i l-. i Ae e.? j v � /' . 1 I •� - � �i -rr� +� ( ��;'�� i � t � �� ��� . ;.� f rl�� �(�)� i� n? iI I ;,,. "'•� , ' \ ., � °., t . . �` \v �;� f� `��1r� + I . ' j.� .� ;\ �3�90) ' .-', � ' ♦ � � �,3f � !' i ' pS y i \ , \ ., y � .. � r i � n� . <: � � . ', ' ', f, �,.�. `"� _ ' �� i ! 9'� ' � � , � � , •� , � ; � � � ti �._ � � � � ,'� , . 4 I = :� "" , _. ' .--;''� � , � :` ' � � � '� + • ; � L� .� ' ^ '1 - � 4 ` ° _ � t � .. . . ' e � � .� ..J {'� :�i :.�.,+ . .-../"� �_` �r r ...� i �. . � _ . i ; , y,..w _ - t {; {:, � / F I, ' 1 � \ ��� �..-" ^_ �� r�s r- � �� ' i. �s . �.. : f �. , . J. r�� -.7. . '� i / f _/' � „ l"'�... �-' , � � �.'. I. _(r✓ �}," I � F : f,� � . � e �! � � • �.(— . ', y r. � rj' . . � �� i,, .. y . �� � �` I �.Cfj �. %:'. i � t ., , „ . rf : f \ ". " ._.—. �. . : i F % ` '-.. _'__.__. s -:i.. �y � :: \ . . � `✓r' f - ,, � €, i y, .[ J i �„ � /� ` � �9��`� � `,j" ! a i ��i � .. � .i� I ( � ?� `4 . �� I � f� y '�;� ,i.. �i� �' �/C._•�la - ` � �F� ,� ! . : � � �., _._ . . " / � ' � i �,a'� .f � �� �� ._ . '_— � L �)C 'i .el ��i . , - . � . , �f .��.;�,.JI � ' .�.....>;- - . ... �� i � 0 = J_- � ' �.'� i� ^�' � � � ( . " . ,;.� .5 ��qp ; � � ! :� ! ,_�'. � / �,1� fi�Jl..-. 4_....____2 __... � 1 � ' ^I � � . �� l��<<�� ��-' � ,.. _. * . 1 •. �_ _ � �'� � �� . .. . '-a._._._ � � o� ' _ . .. . _A , . . .._.. - ._..� , -_ _ . __—`_�. • r .. _. . _ .. . .. . . .. --�. ( P >D) v i : � .,� i 'J_ �.,. � _ ,) � � ' ,, �5��,� E': , f i , ; ��'� `,. � -- `- � i ` I ' 4 I • . � �l ,_ �.i,�c>> . I ' I 0 D-'� j I: 1 ` "' . , v. ,� . , . � , i ('S� �.[ C� '� � � � i. '! . ; i � - _ � ! �' , � - i � ,o� _ ��� „ F ,�,_ � - � � � i � � ° , •o� � f �> , �� I . �- � . . . : �, i. n' . � _ . . . �> , � ; �, � �.'' � � � . . . . . : . I ..'' i ,- .. ;:� ;: •. . - �i , �i�c� � � _ ___` ; '��_... �'. . _ . ; .. �.. . i - . .. . � � � I.;U.' ' � � . _. ' .,�� .,, , "' ___ I '�!{. � k ,� `, ; � � � . �' `� u��� � 1; , � ,, : n" '� : ; ' � > � 1 + ..� i ... -�C,,'� e . . �1i� ` _, { � ,i � , � i`� i �11'1� __ �' - ... ` 1 1 �� !_ . _ , .. . � �' f' , � -i c J p' i � ��. . .. . � i . � ' ;} :. j� � � ,. ; - i r�� 1: �. � _ , ��n` i �. , � !. l,' i �.,_, � l'.'',� l,�n: E 1 ' `( I'. � I . l .. � ��15 . i 1 . . I �. f , � � � �� � � . � `� � ' 1"'. �. .. '+f � j i `�„ ,�' i� �(�,. � (,� . ! . i � �., 1} �� � F ' � � . . , � ; . A.. ( . '� � � . . . i � . :. a� � u�u��ww o �� ���� �� _ q ,N�. �04,. D� Civil, Municipal & Enoiron�nental ��egineering �❑ Land Surucying • L¢nd Plafining • Soil Testtng i `J Suqgested Description Main Office ��571•6066 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 South Office 890�ti510 1101 Cliff Road Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 February 4, 1976 That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 30, Range 24 lying West of the west line of East Ranch Estates First Addition, lying North of tY�e centerline of Osborne Road and lying East of the following described 1ine: Beginning at a point on the north line of the said Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11 distant 120 feet West of the northwest corner of said Addition; thence South and parallel with said west line and its southerly extension to the said centerline and there terminating. Subject to portion taken for Osborne Road and the St. Paul Water Works easement. Rnhrrl hfindrr. lirg. 71nF. F: A. ICuUiL��n. It.r. ?'�.m Aehn F'. llvyra Kr�,'. 3uro. CF.mlra L. l.rnlhr. ftrq. d'ng. Ilbri. F.'. Jrnse�u. llr'g. 1:'nX. IVn�. h'. 1�, �.r ti.r. F��4 ll'm. E. Pri��•�. li.��,• F.'nF. If. tV'illinm !l�.Arre 11rF. Sure. IU.^.f:1.011 h7CCl".]IlQ — 11 �v � • . . . . . � . . . . .. . . . . . . - . . . _. .- —_.� .. ., y . `l. PUItT,1C ill::\::T;'.C: I2};(���1;;;�1• 1'r�ii A':1'IiCT'\L U:;li ]'1:1C']�(',' f;n �•j4--]. ,� _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - --- ' 1'].1i�;.� ..:Ui1: .� i�i : �'i•1' !']'LC.��".' (�I�l.`�'. l�VC�i.� ;;i (t�.1U71 �).i':'.�l)�.�i �'-�Si�� t.o ti] Li���-:i;�• ni�L::icic• :.t.rr:u��� �•! i,:��ri•li,u�cii::�, !r•l�ind �n un:;crucncd c'h.tin I1t�t. I`_'r,c<�, t�r L�• )�;�'.�1��[1 i�;� I.n;: )� lSloci: 1� ]::t:t Ranc`S1 - Lsi:,it��:: ls.' i�c:ciit:ic�n, Yo.�,•t.l���� �;it!� flic l;.ir.lcrl�� .1;0 1:eci. uf t.hai: ��;u-i c�f. t.li�.r ;dii', i>i tL�• �.t:'.� c�f :;�•rt icm 11, '1'-:.0, I:-2�, 1�=i��c� 1Qot th <�[ U:.Lorn�r !: ,,�,1 .u:�t �;�.•:,; ,i:u1 �uf j.ic ��nC Lo I,��l: 1, I91oc1: l., P•.t�::t: l:r;nc�li I::;,;il.c�:: l:,L .�;�r3it.i:;n, t;i�.� .:,u,ic brin�� 7G;>.0 Univi�r:�i.t�. � . T1V �`)lrli: Id . !:. �S.L". JC11�j .iC�l1"VCC lti,l'; I:1 t•:::')1(_ l'i: I�•jll'1`!:t`IiL �_�ii` 1�C'.�'l.t.1011i?l'. r�.illlll].il(1 LOtlllll] ;:;].C�ll �'�i?Ct117(? �- ll"cttiuui•.�. � r �✓ � -• 140TION by llriY,�7�`%� '�econded bR T..indb2ad, th;�t thc P)anning Commi; ;ion ��uivc tbc rcr7dinl ol. t:hc YUi�l.ic 1lcaring noti.cc on f:hc 1•aquc::t for a�Ycci��1 U:ac Pcrn:it:, SP 11%4-.1i, b� 7•'rnnk's Nursvey. Uyon n voice vot-c, ��11 vnC�n9 c�1�� t�)�' 1110L']077 c��rr.icd ❑77J17L710IIS1�. '-?:l� . ldr. C7.ar}; sai.d the main reason for this r.c�ucst was that they �aant to put in <zn outsi.dc di�p].ay west of thc i�re�cnt strucL-vrc, and �hey do not �•!�>»t to 1?ut up a screc�li_ng fence. lIe ��aicl t1ii:> w�3s br_fore Piti.lding Si:�iridards a couplc ot wceks r��;o ancl tlic plan r�as �pprovccl �!ith the stipulation t-hat if the pctiti.or.er did noi� put up a::crcen.in� icncc, he 1�ac1 1:o havc a Special U�e Pcr.mit �ranted by Cour�cil. to put up an wiscreened cliai-n linlc fence. A;r.. Lindblad said that norm:illy Bui.l.ding Standarcl� asl: for a wood fence or a cha:in linY, fence that �aas slati_ed. PSr. Clark :;aid tl�e area �ae are tal;ing about is about 1.00 ieet irom Osborne Ro.�d, and was an area used �r,ostly �or sales and storaqe. Ftr. Schrocr said it wou]_d Ue used mostly._for .r.ei.ai.l sales. IIe sai.ci thaL I'ran}c's r7ursery takes a little different view oi a close out sale i» thc fall, sa to speuk, and t; y basica].1.y sell. do�an_ to nothing. He continued that this area would be used to sell nurser�� stock and baq goocls in the spr.ing oi the year. The bag �1�o�s i:�oulc3 be i:ept along the l�dest f�nce 7_i�ie. � P4r. I'itzpatrick said the fence we are discussing �aill be bet��cen the'blaciciop �rea and the new nursery bed, then. , Mr. � said it Chairman Pitzpatrick said the Sp�cial Use is for sales of mercl�andise in the open then. P:r. Cle.rlc said this was correct. Har.ris as]ced about the zoning of this property. Mr. Clarl� was C-ZS (general shoppinq areas). _ � ASr. Harris said he felt �his should have gone ior a variance rather than a 5pccial Use because it oras just a chanye in the fence. Mr. Cl.ark said that in a coRancrci.al area, storage oL n�erchandis� in the open, ii- .requires and this �vas basically what it was. A9r. Linc]bl.ad said this area taas no longer in the past. I� lot of clianges have bcen made. have concrei.e blocks, etc. tocvards OsUerne P,oad faccs Osbor.nc l:oad �,�as shrubs from Osborne Road Thcre will bc no storage in thc front, it will if there was outdoor a Special Use Perm.iL, the way it r.ad beet: They are noi going to . Ti�e iron'caqc tl�,<�i1= tc the par}:ing arca. all be in tiie rear. - Nr. 31arr.is asl:ed tahaL section of the code w�is being used so thai: thi:� r.e<3uired a Spcci:il Usc Pernu L. PSr. Clark said it was 205.10]., 3, N. Mr. llrig.�ns s.iid 1�c tiiouyht i.i: should be 205.1O1., 3, 0. P1r.. Clark t:aicl Llzc _.cction of thc codc quotcd s�tys "ti�.-ailcrs, carc;»crs, mobi.le hotnes, bo:�t::, �nacll.in<,�-y, :;��ortiinq eytti.pmenti �nd l.ike enCe�-prisr�, h.�vi.nc� its mcrchandi�e in L-he o1�en arid nat undcr covcr of a di-aplcr,> rooin. " T'..'_: �aean;.-^!i Mr. liarris s�zid as hc rc��ds thc Publ.i.c Ilcari.nr noL:i.cc, this �,���s� a�;pccial usc i=o takc, ouL- tl�c ;cr.ceninn f_encc. I•1r. Cl;u-k sai.d hc ci.tl�cr' had to put up a;c:�ceni.ng f.e�icc, or gct a �l�ecial usc to store t1�e merch;indi�c i.n tlle open. : b1r. Driqnns sz�i.d {:hen t.hc code says you 1»ve to have a screcning . icncc to liavc ouCdoor sal.es. Mr. Cl.ar)c said no, you do not. P7r. liar.ris said tlie codc s��ys you h�ve t-o h��ve a speci<<1 usc permit:. t�1r. Drignn> sziicl t}iey miTSt havc a spccin]. iisc �>crmi.t for. ou.tdoo.r. sales, because t11cy ]�ave Laec:n sel.li�;g out the.r.c for ycars. Mr. I,ind}�l.nd said thc basic rca;o:� thcy ]iad bcen as};ed to put up a �aooden f.ence in Che first placc-�, �aas noL that thi:; �aas a sale� area, but becaus,e thi., was a storage area. IIe saicl the Luilding Stand'ard ;-D�sictn Ccmtrol :;u1>co*nmi.tL-ee al�days reco.nmends a screeninq fence t;hen outsidc: storay� c•;as visi_ble fro�u the si:reet-. )✓�r. IIari-is as;:c�d �•�liat section o.`: thc codc t•,as beir.g used as tl�e basis for a scr.ceni�7y fencc? 19r. Clarlc sa5_d that our interpretation was that if you ��aant to have c�ispla�� merchar.dise, �:�?lethcr : t be boat�, si;owmcbiles cr nur.sey st��ck, iri the open, �ahy c;ould you want to scre�n :it? Nr. Tlarris saic7 that �•;as not c:hat ihe ordin;v�ce said. I�ir. Clark said it doesn'i: say anything, it says cui: in the open, not under co��er of a display salesr.00ro. • A7r. ]':i�zpzt�.-ici� said {=hen what you ar.c sayiny is thaL- this t•rould be allo��ed �ai_th a S�ecial. U^e Permit, if t_here taas screening. He , said l:e thotiqtit outdoor sales required a Speci.al Use Permit �•�hether •it was screenecl or ��o{:. r7r. Harris said this is �ahat ]ie thought also. 1�9r. IIar.ri.s sai_d 17e still wonder_eci tah^rz the scr�ening fence came from. tdr. C1arJ; said thi.s came up ai Building told him to eith�r put up a screening fence, Pcrmit. P1r. Drigans said ilien tl�e screening and is not a violation of the code. Standards �ahere they or gei a Special Use is merely a stipulation, 2�Ir.. Lindblad :aic� this has been a recommenden policy for some time. h7r, ]iar.ri_s said it lia; been arhitrarily recommencied, let's put iL- that way. IIe said he cou].d t=a}:c somcone all over the communitp, and some plac�s �,�e do, and scn;e placcs we don' t. TSr.. Lindblad said he didn' t t1�ir.l; t�ir.. Harris woul.d find tliat i n thc lasL- two oi: thrce years. i�ir. llarri, saici he could sltcw where i_� happened ln,t ycnr. I�1r. Lindbl:ad asJced �,�lierc i,his �aas. P9r. Ilarris s<ii.t1 the ]3uildi.i�g Si:nndards l�roacibly didn't evca sce it, and it w�ts arbitrcu-il.y donc. Lir. Harris said thc code has been arb.ii.rari]_y administr��ted ever since it was adoptcd. rir.. nriqans asi;i�d - Sneci�il Use }'enui.t �o Afr. llriqnn.� �tii.d i.htit 1�itz��,ii�ricL- stii.d tLrii. .Ycr.rui t. thZt thcy hnvi� ju: t �z sL:i�,til�2Ci:on, �in A1r. Scl7roer if T�ranl.'s T;ursery already h�zd �� scll nurscry st��cJ:? _ PSr.� Sciu'oer said t-hcy <licl. hc fclt ihZt t��is nll i.hcy �irccled. (:i�airm<<n thcrc t;��is a sti�,�ulnti.on on i:h<:�t S��ecial Usc a scrcc� �nq t� nrc. Mr. 1>> >��ni3�a :,�lid i.hts ��.i�> d not a v.i.o.lczLiu:: oi thc cuc3n. ChpS.Lr;�.in 1'� t:i- ,. _,., . � pii:�-ic1; sa.i.cl tlii.s wcis; a stipulr�ti.oi� of: thc S(�eci.�l Usc Per.mi.t, so wher.c wc arc now, w�r, L-hai. tliey �annt.��ci i_�� coni:iuuc to do aS i:heY L- havc �il�ac�y:, donc, l�ut. toS.thout. t:1�c scr.cen:i.>>g fcncc. �$`J A7r.. Cltu-1: saicl th�t I'r�u�}:' s Nur.^.•cr}� was doin� thi.ngs a].ot di.f:fcrent thrin the �ar,y thi.nc7s �:cre done before. Ile sai.d i:he mc�-chtu�disc . arca had beeri �r�ove�l cday bnc): on tl�e ].oY_. Lh�t tbcy 11ad put �.n ber�us, and shr.ubbcr}� in ironi: of. thc parY.incj aica, ancl the entire area was very n!ucli ;,�,r>>-o����a. r��. ri.Lzpr�tricY. sai.cl it was a much i.mproved businc:;:,, and yci: he felt they �aere ::i:il.l operati.ng within tlie Spec.ial Use ]?m:rnit they alrcady havc, with t}�e exce};�tio» of. the screcning fence. Dir. li��rris asJ:ed Dir. Schr.ocr how i.aJ_1 the nursc�.-y s.tock was. A1r. Sch�rocr held vut hi.s hanct and �;horred ho�.,� high the shrubbery �oas, and hc snid ilie tr.ee.� were tal.ler. t•tr. IIar.ris saic2 he �aould liave to ctit all i.h� tr.ce, of; at six feet, because tliis is orh��t the cocle says. It says you can't have a,crcening fence ovcr eight fect high , and anythi.ng bcli.i.nd the scrcening fence has to be two fcet shorter. Chairma�Z_l�ii:zi�atriek s<:icl they �aer.cn'L tbinJcing about nurse�y sa�oc;c when Lhe}� trroi�e the ordin�nce. rir. IIarr�.s sai.d tliey ��reren't thin;;=ing abotrt anyl:lii�;7. Obviously, the person caho �•�rote this di�n't know k�hat he �aas �:riting. i•1r. 1'itznatricic said this was writ_ten for tl;e stacicing of inerchandise bcl:ind a Lence. He said tl�is �•rot�ldn' t pre- clude aci.ir,c� on t]�is petit�ioii. Mr. Drigans said he didn't see }io�•a ti�ey could act on this petition. I3e �,�as airaid that if e�e d�.d th?_s, he could just see this c�:npounding. Every time someone wanteci to put up a fence, Buildinc� Standards were qoing to tcll people to get a Special Us� Yennit,, and he dicin't fee7. tiiis wus required. He sa:i_d thai= the secti.on oL '�he coc:e that this busi�Ze�s was operating under, .doesn't require a sctieening fer.ce_ Nr. Fitzpatrick said the Spec�al Use that he was o1�erating w�3e�' had a sti-pulation that there must be a wooden scrcening fence, ana that's what t1Ye petitioner wants fo Chanqe. hir. Dric;ans said he thouqht what the petitioner should do was just go i.o i=1ie Ci:ty Coiincil and say he �aant.s tLis fence, and asi: thert to waive thi� stipulation on thc Special Use Permit. t�ir. Lindblad said then 1�9r. Drigans ti�oul.d bc� iiqhting everythi.ng that thc l3ui.iding Standarns-Design Control Subce.iunittee had b�en sugc�ectinq and enforci.nq. T1r. Dric�a�l, said tliat thesc wcre only stipuJ_ations. Ptr. Li»dblad said thac was right, but the olijecL of l�uilding Stanuards was to make r.onie of these placcs a little morc attraci.ivc t:o tl�e people who h�zve to loo}; at tlie�u. If P4r. Drigans �a<�s qo.inc� i.o ta):e tl�at ��oini oI vieta, i.J�cn there was no poini� in IIuildinq Stzndards re�ue;>tinq or siic(gesting �lnythi.ng. Iie sai_d it taas just lil:c I�rc cn�t curbi�i„ �•;h�ch ��;c really c?on't approvc of, ].�ut he said hc did�:' t know if Lhere �aas anything in tiie cocic that said thc�}+ couldn't J�c usecl. Mr, ll.lrri.:; s7icl just- a mi�iutc. He i.olci Chairm�n Pitzpatrick i.}iaL he �,�ishecl t.e s+�cE� down iror.! hi.s posi.tibn on the T'1<inning Commission and i:ake i_ssilc with t:hc Ci.t-y nclmi_ni.stratian and th�, ,'.±ii-ldinc7 ::ttuzcla:-c;:. Ch�irmnn. In hi.; own }�crson,il cIc•:�lincJ er.i.th tticm, �ve havc bc�nn forccd . to put in co��crete curb:; on a y��rti.ci:lar projecb of ow°s, �al�c�� �ae ;' - - _ --- hacl rec}ue ;Ced Co 1�ut: i.n pre c��::i: curh'inq ior. cirain;�c�e purposes. � tD ile :,.ii.d hc thouqhC t.hc� codc hail becn arl�itrari].y z��id ca�>ri_ci.oiis].y adm:i_ni.st,rcitc�Q �inc�� �.19G). 1'.c sa?-d hc wasn't�� saying it war. ❑11 thc admini.si:r.li.i.c�n's faul i:. Thc ordinancc, in many cascs, �aas 1.acLin9 in candor and )rno�.al.i�<lc3c of thc si.lu<at.ion �i � i{: c:i�tc in the City of Prid].cy. Ilc :aid that he per.son��lly fc].t tl�at t:hc person wiio wroi:e the ord:i.nance ha��n' L- thc faintest i.dea of �:rhat`s goiny on, has nevcr driven �ui}�t.hi.n<J ].ar.�T�r th�ui a Lall ton picJc-up trucl:, and s:its i.n an i��nry to�:JCr son�cplrlcc .u�d c?oc:u�' t know arr��thi_nci about business, huilc'inc� or anyi:l�ing clse. IIe thanited the Pla�uZinq Commission and said thaC �an, all lic had i:o say on thc subject. Atr. Drigans sai.d he w�der.�tood �ahat the I3uildi.ng Standards- De :iqn Co�it.r.ol Subcommittee �o��s try�.ng to do �ahen they try 1=o enhancc thc �urrou�idi.ng pi:oporLy, but hc t]�ot.glit they er.tenderl tl�emsclves ti little i=oo far �•�hen t.hcy direct a petitioner thaL- thcy must have �� Special: llse Per!ni.i., or get u v<�riznce, 4*hen in essence they �vere not violatincJ r�ny codc:s. T1zey arc o�ily atttaching a recommendati.on or a stipulat.i.on, and lie tliought that if the petitioi.�r �aa�zted to LaYc issue with a sti.pulation, thai it s}iould go dir��cLly to Coiancil. Iie said he cou]_r�. see nothing in ttie cocle that says t.he petitio�ier must. hav� a scr.eeninzj fcnce. Mr.. I'it�patiick said thero o.as a st.pulac:i.on on the e�:isting Special Use Permit that says they must have a woode;� screeninc3 fc�ncc�. A2r. Drigans said then they are b°ing asked i.o gct a Special Use Permit o» a Special Use Permii. Nr. Clar)c said that when thi.s SL��cial Use Permit �vas i5sucd ihere were certa:i.n stipulations put on this Special Use Penn:it. Noer the petit�_oi?er has rome up �,*ith a new plan, and he doesn't want the . wooden screening fc�nce. Ii� was th� Planning Comi��ission and the Cour.cil ��;ho er_iqin.?1J.}� ap�.roved this Snecial. Use Yerm? t with this stipulation. No�•r ihe pc'c.itione.r t�:a:; b<tck Lcfore tlie same body as}=ina to have the stipulation for t)le sc�-eening icnce removed. Mr. Dr_igans and DSr. Ha,-ris said tliey di_d not get this iniormation from thc ]lear_ing not:ice for tlu.> >-equest. I�ir. Clar}c said the reason this v,as brought io the Plan»i.ng Coruaission's attention �eas because the pet�_tionc�r was no longer providing a scr.cening fence to }:eep this area from bcing out in the opeii. Mr. Fii.zpa�ric}: said the reason this stipulation was pu1= on the oi.her. Special Use Perrni.t was because t:e. Gaere scrceni-ng somei:hing tha� taas much closcr to Osbor.ne Rozd, and his i.nte.r.protatien of the p�'esent petit=i.on w1s simply {=o have a Speci��l U::e Permit �.:ithout !:h�t stipu- lation. A7r. Harris sai.d that the petitioner was in essence asking that tlie screc�iiing Lc�ice be remo�ed. Mr. Clark said the present location of ihe narscry stocl; �aould makc this scree�u.nc� fence unnecessary. A7r. I,i.ndblad said he Lhouciht th<iL- l�e was widcr a misunderstaiir�ing a� far as tlie 13uildi.ng Standnrd�-Des:i.c;n Coni.rol Subcomanittee �aas concc�rnc�d. 7t �ais h.i.c u;�dcrsi:andinc� L-hnt tl�is SiiLconun.iti.cc t,�as a recommendi»g and advi::or)' . 9roiip set u�.� by Council to qivc reconr.m,�:da- ti.oi�s t�ncl acl�>;�c Lo ih�� Cou�;c;.]_ lic sai.<1 thcy dicin't. hnae aily :;zy � on �;hr.thc�l tt�i:; or thai �.as; ti<�n�., t•��� ji�::1, ma'.:c �uc�qc:;ti.on : on ho�a �,;i� thi.nk som�_�h.i.nq could l�c donc I�ct.tcr, r.lirtl�cr ihi.:; i:� co:3c or. �iot � ~d P1anili_nq Commi�r:�sic�n Alcet-:i��r��hcr.emhcr 4, 1974 Paqc_ 9 _� code,-ii.'s si:il.]. stxi.cL-l:y up to tl�c Council. Lor i_n=;t��nce� t:he code :;try.. ri build.i.ng has tv be paintcci. :C:� i.l�cy real.iy want to gr.L- nii:- pi.r,}:inq, th�y can ju:;t �?�snt i.t onc �ol.�.d color., 1�ut tae sugcjcst ma}=bc �brea}:�.nc1 tlu:� up into d�frcrcnt colo� :, �i��nq somc break-off b1oc;:, or oi.her �nc.nn :, so i.hai: when ihis buildinq is consti-uctcd, there i; somc type of hreak i���a long w,ill. R� faa- �s thi.s >creening is con- cer.ncd, he s�iid he didn't car.c .if it was codc, law or what h. ve you, he dScin't eJre ni: his. poini:. 1ac r.eeommencl Lhat saorle thi.ncJs have to be scrcened, anc3 �ahy it ha ; to conte to a Special. Use Pennit., �+'e don't care about L-haC, cithc,r. It's jusi that he thouqhL Lhe Sui�cci,�rnittec was supposed to he doing a job of malci��g rccoramendaL-ions to tl�e CaLUlcil, taho can over-rule us �ahcthcr �ae li}:e it or. not. Cliai.rman P.i.tz�»t:rick said Lhat i_n t1�is inst���rc, hc thougltt the. 13uilcli.nq Si�riciai-ds-U�siqn Cw�tr.ol Su��..onunittee Yiad a gooc', reason Lor sti.pulatin�J t-h� c��o��clen fence at the tir.ic: tl�at ��he1 d.id, but now that the p.lan� hatire cliangcd, he didn' L- thiril: i:hey would mal:e thc same stipizl'atio�i no�•a. P'i� . Lin;lblad said he thought �•:hen it got right doEan to it, they �aere sayiiig tlie Bui.ldinc; SLanci«rds-Desi-gn ConL-rol Subcommictee caasn't necessary and everyone should just i.nte.r.pret the co�e any.w?y,l=hey r�ant to. That's wirai� seems to be ]�eing said here, i.f �ae reconunend an�rt:t�ing that's not speciiically in the coc?e, �ae are wasting our. time. Cha.irman litzparrick said that stipulations can be recommended. P4r. Lindu7�d said that is �ahat happened on this. tde made c1�e recom-- � me�?c3aiio?i L�.clL the screening fer.ce reinain, and tlic pet:itioner did not t��a»t this because he ��;anteci his ciisplay visable ai�d epen. Mr. Li_ndbla.d said �any tl�is reco�mlu:r�dat;.cn for a Special Use Permit. didn't ro directly to Council, instead of b�ing routed to the Planning Commission, he really didn' t kno�v. Tdr. llar_ris said hc thrnaqht the basic iault lies cti+it:h the ordi_nancc. Ile said that he didn't think thc ordinance even comes close to bc•_ing able to handl.e ihe situations �:�e get into. If you go through ihc scr.ee��ing ��ecti.on, a.t- �aas obt,'ious that it taas inadeo,uate and just �•rvn'c fit an�� of the prablt�ms. ;ie said th�.t as he r2ad the petitier�cr's request, ihe basi.c rc<e :on for this Lence ��;as for securiiy. l:e saic;l ihat ivat�l�e t)�5.s t,*asn'1� �he '�irii� to di�cuss this, but ma�,b� �ae shoL�ld get do�on to thc problem of :ahy �•re have fenccs. If it is fo.r secw=i_ty r.easons, t=hen obvionsl.y a�aooden fe�:ce or a slatteci cl�ain l.ink fe�?ce �woul.dn't Ue� for secw'.it.y. Tliu �?o15.ce evuldn't see through �i soli:d fence, ancl �+nyone cotild hide b�l�i-r.d such a fence. Tf it's a ience Uct-�vccn rc�:ici��i�i.:il ;and coruncrical or. i.nc�u :iri<�1 }-,roperty, tlien ��ou need a scr.een.i_r.<� fence. There i� a�o place i.n the ordi_�i�:nce �ahere ti�ese d.ifCcrcnt >.ituaLions �:rc tal:en into account. lIc sc�id t.hc P1ani�ing Curuni.ssion +;ould really �h�ve to makc a groater effort to gci� {�l�rouqh these orcliixinces so we ca�� ni�il:e some reccmme�itiaLions L-o tlie Cou.i�cil_ Chai.rmcui I'itzplt.T-ick srii.d he aqrced th�ic tiiere wer.e m�n}� cectio:;s � of i:he t:odc ih.�t ncc�l�d �ccoaui-nQ:�i.io��: for chau�7u, but 1�c d:i.Qn't. tlli.�il: t hc �n ��ri�t ��ct.i �icu�cr �cvul�l ]�c� ii�.1Q up oii li i� a'eqiic :t . ilc � h.is ti lcq�.t i�.,.�t-c re.>��uc�i., z�i�c7 a rcr nn.ac�idnL-ion s'r�otil�a� l�c m�.Qe c�ne raa�> or. �hc ot:hcr. r�,� Plrinninct Crnn:ni.::,i.on I•9ceLinc� - Der.emhen- n, 197�1 Paqe ].0 - Mr. llrzgans �aid that �ahat he tl�ouqhL- rras requircci by the Plann.i.nc7 (:c,:nriiss;ion �-r�s a moL-ion to Counci_1 .r.ccornmcnding i_h<.it they �modiS y thc �� � s�t.i�uf S��i:cial U�r• Permit si�i.pul.nti.on for. a �^�oodc.n scrccn- inq fem�r. to an t:n �rec;ned chr�i-n linl lence f��r. securii:y. FIc� said he thoughi: this wr�s Ci�c rnoi:.ion to bc m�ide for. t�ao rcasons, one bei.nq th�tt he didn' L think <� ;pecial Use PenniL- caas nece�sary for a fcnce, ancl i.Lc other. rc�:�son t�as bec�ii :c t�c thoughi: L-hc �aro�ig sectic�i of i;hc code was use�1 in the 1'ul�lic liea�-ing nai.i.cc. F702']'Ot�' bg Drig.�n:;, secondec9 by llarrzs, t6.�L tl:e P.lanni.nq Cnnuni:st;�on cl.osc tl�e 1'ublic Uear.ing on i:he requesC for a Speca.a2 Use Permit, �.SP (l%Q-25, 1'ranl:'s 1Jt�rscrij. Upon a voice vot-c, aII vot.inq ayc, thc m�ition carr.ied un�nirrously. 1:07'.(D;d �b� Ur.igans, seconded L� II�7TT.2S,� thai- ihe Planniny Com;nission recomraend�iro Courtr.il th�t the requcst for a Special Use YermiL, SP �)%�-IS, bq F'ranl:'s TPUrscry, per Pridley City Code, Section 205.101, 3, 11, to <:1Jor.� t:he out-s.ide stornge of inerchzndi.se bcl�ind an unscreened chzi�� lins: fe;;cc, to be ]ocated on Tol- 1, B1ock 1, Bast Fanch Estates Is� J�ddition, Coqei-her ia.ith the T;asterlq 17.0 feet of that part of ttze IJP;:' of t1�e /,'h+'.; of Sectioi� II, T-30, P.-24, Iyinq A*orL-h of Osborne Ro:i�. �ird i.'est �nd adjacc:nt to Lot 1, Bloc}: 1, L'ast Ranch Esiates I:;L Rddic:ion�, t1+e sa�ae being 76?D L7niverslt� Avenue N.E., is nut necessrzr�„ and recorn�nenn thut Counc.zl modify the er.isting Special Use Permit, SP L'7,'-07, to cl�ange -t:he .^,tipal�tion of a wooden scrce7iin,r feizce io . a chriin link fe�7ce for secua�iLy purposes. � Nir. Laiiqenield s�:id that iL the merchandise on dis7�la1� �hoiilc3 becomc a visual l,azar<i, he feli: that at tlrat �ime, Lhis request sl.ould be reco�lsidered as to whei:her this area shoiild bc screened or not, or elsc tiicy should move ihe display t�ndcr cover. P�7r. Di'a.c�ans asl:ed 2,Sr. Langcnield �ahat he me�nt by a visual hazard? Pir. I.angenfcld �aid it woulel bc �•omething that �aas unpleasing to ihe eyc. Chairman P.itzpatrick saici that originally �alien the fencc� wrzs rcqui.red, t-.lii.s husinc�ss was 30 feet from thc ioad, and no�a we ar� ta].l:inc� about i.t bcinc� setback alroost 150 fcet irort Osbor?ic Road_ '•ir. Driga�is �aid hc ciicin't see thaL this would ever crcate a visual hazard_ Dir. Sch?:ocr said that no o�ie h��s asked fo;- it_, bui: he ww��s wil:L:iri; to ta1:e �t porC.ion ol i=he �aooucn fence, th�t has bee�t ta);en do�•.�n, �zn:l put it up from th� 1?u.i.li3ing and on out al�onl- 30 fceL-. 1�7.]. i:hc tooic and nursc3-y _:tocl; i.h�i: has to i�c brougl�t bcicl: to loolc good ngai:n, �.routc. be storcd bel�i�id ili.i:; t•;ooden i`.ence. D7r. Lan�Tenfcld :isl;ed �:here they kc��t i:hcir bzles of hay at {:his ti.mc? T1r. Schrocr :;aid they }:ept them undi:rncat:h thc roof . UYON n VO7�CL YOY'li, ,�12 voting .��I�=. Lf:e irrot:iou c�rricd un�nimo[�s].y. � LOT SP(..?T A,�PI_ICATIQi! �..,.�.�...____..m �...�. _ CITY OF FRIDLCY APPLICl�N`i': (3/L!�i I�1'• L l. F����l`D/6'f , lu�DkESS: �.3 �7 � .C, /� IU��' I� �- �j� J�.l�i' Street City 7,i Code TELEPIi0P1E '� S-%/ 'C��_y- Homv Buoinests EROPIItTY 0',°l:ir�t(S) �!J � ADDIiESS ( ES �_ TEI,EPF30i�IE �{ $ Streei Home Cit� ty � �� ...�. r$��?.�.TY?Ic•,,,r'--�-''=R'�, �—: Applicunt's tlame LoC Spl it `" '•` jG uY i�ate Filed: �/�i �G Fee:,S i1'�Receipt �{ " `IG ?,��"' Council Action:llate IiITd6RF:S : `Lip Code Zip Code Buainese .�..�.�._ ��- Prop�xtyr Locu�inn o:i Street . or Er.act Street l�ddrea9 (It' H1?Y) _- .�a»....�.��-� �. T.�mn 7 iloacri n'r ; nn r. f' i-'rnn.�^f.v: Total �sea sq. ent Zonin� L'la�sifica The undcrai�zed hereuy declar�s that all the fncts und repreeentatione stuted in this npplicstion sre true and correct. DATE: ,� �I,�Z - 7� SIGN1�2'ORP� r"f/l1ll%� , i�i/-r�tc' �� -- ARLO`�d b'nR C1TY iiSr�Q??,Y (Sec? �everso csido for aciditional instructiona) r��. ..�_..��...�.: PLA'1'S W SIiLS: ➢ate of Con�iderati.on - Re�uarka: � � pT,A1�lI1�G CO;f1�11S;:;lOP: Dete oS L'oneiderntion - 32 emurkc� : GITY COL1t�CSL: Date of Cnr.r�ideration - HemarY,o: _ __..__._.....;__._--.._._..�..�:_..--`�-, , J ,_ ,.. . 7 - 2 onald nrooth f � ` R E � Lot �` �-,` i i�b! c Split�off the Westerly,85 ° �� ' rE'; ��`i� � 3 Block 1 Oak Greek Addltron Plat 2 � f , r, b �. � � � � ,..� r � � ,.. ia� � \ , �J.�-`y� s� l `F/ �j �r�` ��J���"` � � �, `� I�O , ' v L��. . �.�. z f) „ �� p .. !"/�l �, . \<.�, .�'G'�' . f�`� /E�!/DP� /d � �I� + 1\ � � _,,,,r: '' , / � i i� �� r ���.\ � � ` � � � r �_,. ;';+ r3� • "• � � G ,. � I �:. !3 �� ; � � �\' �' �� ` { , �� . .'�� '�.�-'" . /fS � � , '�J - '�.� . , CJ ' : ; : "'^"11 , C .. t 1 - . •1 ,�`r � � r � � • ` ,../�'^.'`/�� � , _ j'4 `� I `% . 'i- . . � .. \ 1 � .�' V ,^,/ii'` . �S6FC�i, /n/S�� ��) ��0� � �.t� \ \ �l . ' �,` ., � � G'f v .! ' � �,') � \ \ /�ti ,s(''� l � �J � , r, . `^1� � � V, � l^ V .%/ � �' /,J� 'c `:� 1 ��^,� ��/, . , �.�� s � ' `� , r i'��{ ��- S � .��,N 0�! ` �- �r�� .,. �i`, .�• ` ''�.T- , .� , � ,r-i A r� �: �� . . € ..� ". �� � ./ � � �J / �' , . �� � ��=.; ' / � .a f� .��..,� � Y�.'-�, ."':. '� � �. . . �LJ.-�.�� , •i r� ' � �`' r u ;�,: �'�• \ �„ „i- �' \ ��.1_ � /� .;` � \ � _.. f. ' ` . ro t� F �� . r' � �`. , ` �;`-` . r.. \ ayy 1, ,{., , �1� . ` �i '- � - ! \. E ` � ' �y � `,-� - � k g � E : , ��� ! . ' t' . � "�- �j�.:. � �1 `11 `\ ` ; {{ ��! . ,�� .�� �+-.. f',r.'%"" !f� � � < . I-� ! �� � •. - � � t.c��� . �� ,�1 "�-- �....�. � .�i ,' .�.. � . ,. ��% �g . , � �. � � �[`- / ,� � �� \ ' '�� ` 1�` � r �,, t ; � ��,` � 1 n .. �,,,.F �.. ,. ` / �' C `` i � �, ,.� ,r � . .,:>f� ?,��9 i �I ,.. , � � `t .'{ ,4f`� ^�f"!/'i" � '' �' ! ��•. �\• �\, r� �,``� `�, `I` �vYf r � �a � J u� ..�� ✓� �1`' �i� 1 I{�;{� � 9 � � � . � . � � �� 1 � � �� � .- � . � �y/� � �' � � � � �/(i�� Y \u. � �/ � . l �� ,`��" . � F �%'�l � ` 1 �>' _ � � JOS �' ( � � � , :� \ . t , 1 1 . F _ �,.. . , . �/S �, '' � 4 --t ._ _ _� ,' . t� . t � �`, �'; �, ' / t`� � J - . .'Fl �,. / r'� � � ' 1 � tt / �3 , �j � ` .Zc � �r..,�,'':� � 1 � _,-.--�--'�'_' e . _�,� _. .._ �y �, � '. . 1 `r` , 1 �s9 ..�- " J D , oo k � r r � ; . ,, r , � �,. _._..,, � \�� N ; � r= �- ,, ��! :.i�' �, ' J.. � 1 ��r .., � 4.. � , , r �, .- , � �, ; . <. a . �, ,/ � � s r- �^ . . ,T -; . � `, � �,.. r �r1`�t .• � .. : J°' � - J��.�. , � 4e . .l / d �t� � rt \` ,. . � . � / . �! ) / .ri� t ' - �'� 1 � ! )-� (j � � +-t � r i �'`i � � y f ��..- _ �,/ _ � � � t � ', \'t ' � E� �, (�.o� � � ,- . :', ' .�.-, � ; y r ..6 , . . ,: t � ,,. . _ . - �. , � [,r _, f / '.� �. �f .i ' � ..i/. �� �, j 7i�5 . .l, _ � ..' �.: .- .. � . . �- �_ - . '�'� �� . ,.' ry � ' ��? � , 4 . .. "'. . __"" .� ! �B � �e il 0 �� � j 1 . ,. J . �.. ,�.. IJ � ' ,,�. ;, ' 1 . „ , � , ,'„ r�� g< .. ,;i��Q. �! /_ �, - ; � � � . � , i � � / ! , � '�:1� ` � ' \ i ' � 1 'i. . - . . _-.� ry � O!1 1 � � � '. ( �� � ^ i � t ... . . . '.-'., _,. . . � f � E�. � 1 f'�, I.. ���� %i'� .. � i:i � �......t ... i.. . I . / J f ' � d \ .F � / . � . _. .�. . . . \ . 7 . + � �� ��') .� / �ti � � if 1 /�i �i)7 i � ' ` % ' 1 i_ ..w {1 � . � % / � � ' 1 � . P ' ... I % 7% �. ����' - ���` � _ ` .._ k _° ".__ �� t , -�1r, , �� �" �, ' , ;�. , -i , f , .. � , , .,� ' i � ;-�� � . � � i i � . _. ' ` � . „ . �.� J, Y.. . . .S '.I�'.� .F, �.... ... _ " �.� ', ..._... .�Lu. �- -- .,'1-.. .. . , . � t k t+ , .. } I . . %' �. i. ,.. . ., i . � � .� � .. - - .. � � . . _ . . . • ,,., - !$�J'. a�..t,.�:�-_' . A'-'. �:-. .t3. �b. , � ` _ . � ,T,F :;' ,�:., _ ' , t�, , _ �;i� � :: �_ -;', _ _ � - Q ., I �= A .: � c__ : .. ��.,� '� �'�'._�€. M � i'� 9eT" ' g .�! �: f-1Ll! f�' .. , Y-'` 3 i _ _ --a y. _ f _' E' . a — 8 l ��� ,•5 " ` i ��k — � Y ��� . + � � , � ' s ' Y. " %� -. . :.... - } ' .4� � � :.�b.. ' L.�' 3 � 1 'i . , I hereby certii�-�hat" ih�.'s �w :��true and :correS�-�la.t '03 _ survey-.:of io� 1,, `82oc3c 3; O�k;{Cl�a�.�it:iatr-,Plai 2. �'�s surv�� � by rae-1n 3uae, I955 A. �. ;. k, �..;•� ` =�' .:� ;$ - - � � f _ . . , -`< - ���itiL� ' L���� .,o.�� �--- — � . � .. GART RIG w+�o- OLSA�+. • - .. . � � . 9� 1 ' `�'_i�_T HAR��EY A. CARTWRIGHT ANOKA COUNTY SUHVEYS HCNNEVW GOUHTY SURVEYS MINNEAPOLtS SUHVEYS •GAlO YAIM STREET N. W. -SUesEi 4�i653 � DWNCR l� t� -` •-��i+ tia .`� -ti..--- . �sTg•. ,�"�' � };-�., � , •...�•itiLw��v. (�:.iu.r�. �I��nS �+w .:�r! al....j�.:✓b`� L�t;1D SUF� 6���'fl: S REGIBTEREU Ur�Dfft LAW6 OF BTRTE O} MINNc50TA . ' UGE1:580 OY ONDINnNCi OF QTY OF MI.NNEAPDUS . 326 PLYMOUTN FJUILDING FEDERAL 8-8721 IMnUSTRiAL - JU�ICIA4 HENNEPIN .4T 51XTH • MINNEAPOLIS 3. tAiNNE50TA OUSWES+ -� TOCOGHAPNICAl. . lyl(L�UC�OC'�J �CCiIfICP.if GTY LOTS - PLATTING ChtR�i-ES Fb§7E'�6-02 by Ronald Enrcoth � , �„a ;...... . � �i � i�1 ; ,� :'� i �t} 7 ; � �� ;' \ �. :�� i .; � �..�._. p .. --� �'-- 9 I .. (j Y ti .. �1 '. ..�� .� .� . �'« J � i � C I_ C' ���1 � i CUMD�NING TNE RECORDS OF J, E. HILL, QV�� EnciN�cp � csrwnusnco toce c. F. snNO�io-� �'! CIVIL ENGINEF,R . .. ESTI.4LISMl0.1408 � � JAMES NE! �'ON . � SURVEYOft .� LSTA9LItiHEO IYYI METROPOLITAN LAND SVRVEYORS. ESlwBl�4tlE�� 1VD� 460--124 � NEREEiY CER7lFY TI1AT iN i S � IS A TP,UE Ai�JD CORR[CT PLAT OF A SUP.VEY OF 7HE ��'E�T F',.rj,0� FEET OF LOT �yBLOCKI ��A� CREEK ADD i T I OP•! :�i..f+T � C t TY � OF FR�DLEY�nPlOS<A COUI�JTY� - F�YIP±NESOTA AS t�1ADE GY �9� THtS� � 3TH Df,Y OF .JULY s 197C3. � _ i; � � C�k . � b.`I / C � � .� t � `v . !s , � `•��b T �� F f: / � 1 tii �� L -� /�.� �� �_�4 �) 1 � ^7 � � � i� � '� `• � ``•? � � \ ; �, o � ` } � . ��l I '� � �� ',� � � i�\ l� � . . . � .f- . �� . t ...�. � ..�.��.., ''s'�__ . �..�.� �_ r��... . ! . . . � �•� r I.� i �•� ��� �+- C 1�• �'•��'x �� f f •' �` �� 1 L . • �- . : +�. ,. , � 1i+'��C,.ir .-. f i ' t � �.!3.. .i. �~4: i ! ,.__... 51GN[D _.-�_.Sri__'___'__-___— . CAR7'V:1a1GN! �:m O�`_:ON � r� ��' �u�..�.,��`- 52 January 16, 1976 Bill Scott Chairman, Human Resources Commission City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Bill: At the December 9 meeting of Community Schools, you suggested that I submit to you our budget for the Fine Arts Project subcotmnittee in order that you could carry forward to the Planning Commission a request for support in underariting our projects. I am requesting that you carry forward this request as soon as possible so that the City of Fridley Council can take action on our preposed projects as soon as possible. � JB:nl � Very truly yours, �n ���\��1. �--c.�^' V�LCMI��_ �!�� -- .� Jim Bruder • � , Chairperson Fince Arts Proejct Subcommittee � t��:n[�oeEn ��i�„r,eT - <<?��� }' T"'' . R. . - .. . , .. : � 1: F: ]�7�ID;.`,Y I,L'�H'1i� I'.i;5:��'�'l'I�'.�. i:0:':��i�57:'_.. ; t ,. ��e !:x;,e:ir,�,: . ,�e:.er�'. ,� . , .. . tiu;�-Coranitt� es R. Tne�ter PraE,;�sed P�rforr*i4nce ?t,ne l�l7b Artistic llirector �c�. hnica'. Direc�icr Production Costs � � hiis��a i I aneous �xpens2 �3. ;;ra;��ni�t C. Piusi.c ; _ . , r. S 600.00 4CiU. !;;' 120u.'�e` z`o�.u; so.00 '_=U. U�• "Li'L.00 �2'iQl:'.ui� 5� ar•,^ i MEt•10 T0: Dick Sobiech, Public 4lorks Director �t4EF10 DATE: Jerrold Doardman, City Planner t1E«0 DATE: February 9, 1976 RE: Status of Compehensive Elousing P1an and Implementation I>rogram As you know, the Comprehensive Housing Plan vras recor�mended by the Rlanning Co.�nission on February 4, 1976 for a�aption �y the City Council. 4�e are tentatively setting the Public Hearino bcfore the City Council on �ebru�zry 23, 1976, in the hope that they �•�ould be ready to take action on the Plan on 14arch 1, 1976. In the meantime, 1•+e are workino on the Coinaiunity Ueve"{opment 131ock Grant application. ble are required U,y the Federal government to hold two public hearings on this applicatiorr. The first Public Fiearing will be on Februa�y 18th before the Flann�ng Cemmission, 4.�d the secorui Publ�ic F�earing before the C�ty Council on t9arch Sth. Thi� should allo��� plenty of time to make the changes and still meet the deadiine of Narch 15, 1976. We also should �ake act-ion on Section 8 housino. This is due ati �he �etropolitan Councii in early f�larch. I am plac�ing the Section 8 Fundin, reso�ution ori the Planning Cormiission ag°r�da on February 18, 197b, and request aci;ion on this resolution by the City Council on t4arch lst. 4!e can then gct chem in to the h]etropelitar� Co�,�ncil so we can receive Sectia,n �8 funuing fo� nex� year. (Fiscal Year 1976). . A7so, ii the Fridley HRA, is still consiu�red active, they must approve � Fridley joining the Pi2tro HRA. They can do this hy making a. recom�i,endaiion to the City Cour.cil to ccmplete tl�e attached appiication. {•!e r�ill be discussiny the City's goe,ls and objectives at the Februa��y 18th Planning Co�ission meeting und I ti�.ould like to meet tiaith you and Nasim prior to this time to discuss tlie direction we should go. Attaci�: 3 � . i.�$ � Ll � RLSO1�ii'TIOPJ AIPP]IOl;I7.I�dC 7'illi TiI;fROPOT,I'F/�N COUNCIL 1'0 A1'1'�I.Y 1'Oit ll0US1NC �SSIS'I'AfICE ]'UNDS FOIt ITtYLV:t•11;1d'1'A'L'10[3 1•7I'J'i11.N TSI:: C]:7:Y OI' WHCP}:AS, the P1et-7-apoliL-an Council has Ueen duly organized pursuant Co Minnesota 5tatutes 473.06, suUd.3 and Minnesot'a Laws 1975, Chapter 13, Section 6, SuUd. 3; Sectiou 21, Subd. 1; and Section 24, and has all of the po�•�crs and duti_es o£ a housing and redevelopment auLhoritp pursuant to Lao.=s 1975, Chapter 13, Section 24 under the provisions oi the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment' Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.411 to 462.711, and acts amendat�r-r thereof; [dHEREAS, the City of and the Metropolitan Council desire to assist lower income families and elderly to obtain adeyuate housing in the City of at a price they can afford, and to accomplish this purpose desire to apply for federal � funds to undertalce a program oi subsidizing rent pa�mients to landlords who provide adequate housing to such individuals and families. NOW, THLR�FOR�, B� IT RL'SOLVED BY TIIE CITY OF that the Metropolitan Council is hereby authorired to include the City of in its application fer federal funds to implement a program of rental assisCance Lo lower income families ancl elderly, and thaL' upon iederal approval of such application, Lhe City of and the MeLropoliCan Council �aill enter into an a�;reemenL for operatin� the prog:-am within the Citi��. L .�-._ ; � Rrr��• su�ivrY oul�� Name of Bldg. (if any) Address Year Uuilt (ii }:nown). LX11 TvTP T 1;: 1 , Smith Towers 123 - 4t11 St, (1969) 1 13R #�' of units rent # of vacanc ie s 1 BR 11 $165 1 vacancy Feb, 1 2. I3R �# of units rent # of vacancics 2 !3R il Siss 2 vacancies Feb. 1 Mar. 1 3 .I3R # of units rent #k of vacancies 3 BR 4 S2ao no �acancy �a 4 I3R �k of units reni �� of vacancies For rental houses or dupler.es, give the total number of rental units by size of unit, rent, and no, of vacancies. �;AMPI,L': Dupler,es and rental houses: Total units: 100 1 BR S � 2 BR 25 3 BR 60 4 BR 10 � $150 - $180 $175 - $225 $200 - $325 $240 - $360 1 vacancy 4 vacar.cies 7 vacancies 1 vacancy More detailed informatia� on specific rents for duplexes and 1louses would be useful if possiUle, but addresses aren't needed. They should be retained for your filcs, however. 4 BR 0 �,PL�' t f V.� f . �' � ' J . ..... .. .. . �J.��� 1 � n��ir:�eiic�r��i.i•rnra cour:c;ii: �Jlll��` .il���l (�'�(`�ii) u(�lli)YC �illl]Ci!II(1� �ii1111f. ���Jll�� T�I11111�..`SV�.iI �>:����� i 51;C;'I'ION !t 1101J �tIJ;; I�55IS'1'AIJC1: f'n1'P-II:N'f'S 1'ROC�I:AM cora•ei�/1C'C bYl'f'll r�iur�icii��>>.rr�� ��� I P 'I'lil;i I1(;ItL;I;f,II,I:'I', enl%�ic�! inlo as r.�f Uiis rlo;�, lh.: ___._.,.,..___ cl.iY �'�-----......._-°-- I�elv�ecn Lhc IvletropoliLan Council (hcircin.i(LOr n�f��rrc�i 1�.� as: lim Ccnuii;il), and lhc Ci.ty of ----...-------.-----------' (heri:iii�tic:r rc[crr�icl lu a:; Llic CiIY). VJ I'I'ti 1: S S I;' I' 1 f: V+'I]l:Rl:llS, tlic: Council. i.nh:n�ls�to UnQ:�rta!:c c� E�ri,;;rom of sul�:.i�liiirn� rr�nt po��rnunt, �rl[ ��J6VC:l� Illi.'.Vill"_` �il:':1�1%iti iliY.� �UI' L�l^ C:�!.�i�l"]j' �U il:iSl:i�. ��7Qi;1 lll (!�>�d1lU.I1C) i1Q:;�;Ui1[C' �:Ul:;il.11�j � ;]R�1 � . V�J1fI:R1.;i�S, lhr� C;oun��il I���s rccr�iv;�d (unchin�� irum th�� [inifc�l Slal�.-�s I),:�pt�rfu�enl oI llousin�,� ancl l.Jrhan Develo��mei:f (lfU7:)) unrle. <� lil.JD Section 7i 17ousiucJ /�;sistance Ya}•iur:nCs 1'rugr�n� A4r,sLCr Anituai ConlribuCions Controct (R?a:;tcr Contr�c;t) claleQ ---,--_-----_--._--_ Lo ar.t as a PuLlic H��usiny Agcnx:y Co impl_rrn.�nt this prc,r.��u, .����J WIl]:I:1;AS, U:c Cily h�3r; 1:�� reaulufion i�riic•��Ic.�i ils c!��sir:: lu �•;�rrir:i;�nfc ii� I.his j)1'UiJl�i1171 �Il1C� �O L15:;1.5� :iUCll 1.Ili�)V1C�llil1S �ill(� I�11q111CS �O CL'�81I7 [�CCi`17�� 58�i?. alll(.l � SiIIIILJ:y i�nu:;i.iiy i.n th:� CIL��' lI� �)I�GCS tliey can a;[orci, �nd . . . V�'III.:RL'1SS, lhe Counci! d:sirns to purchasi� certain necesstiry acfn;i��isLrtjfiv:� �ervi�e:; (1'q�ll ��7C L1�`f l.11 C011l)RC�'J(?I1 bi+l��7 (:ii17j'lll.`J Oli[ ��7C' �?1'O��Cilill� �lil!1 �VIl1:RL'AS, lh�. Coinicil is ��ul:horizad Lu c�ectii.� on agr,��:menf ior tl��� ��urch�rc of. �n'oyr��m sr.r��ic�s t�ncl lc� [t�}:c all �cl.ion speci[iccl or eor�lcmpl��C, u h.�rcin pursuant lo I.�iws 1�?7�i, CI;opL�r 1"3, Scction b, Sulx?. :;; S;:c[ion'l.], S�.�i�cl. i; ��nrl Sc�:tion "l.�l, �rid 1��as all o( fh:, �,n�•:.�rs ,�n�:l i.iuLics c�l o huusiny t�n�i r��cl� vcilopin•:�nt authc�riC�• �)llfSllilll� �O �.il�'d5 1`����r (i�li��)�l'l' 13. SCC�.IUIi .��� Ull:�il' �-�-iC �tfCiVl.tilUi1J C� li)t' htunicip�il Uc.wsirn,� ,�r,ci l:,:r.levi�luEnun»L T�cL, h1in;ir;;;pt� SL�LUt��s S�:i;liou 1G'L. 11 Lo •Ili?.%11, �lnt! ilc;L; t�iu�tn:l,.il_r�l)' I:hc?rrc?f; iJC�\•V, 'i'IICRI:I'C)RC, in c<�nsi�.l��r�liun of flie �nutu�il c;o�+��ntiuls ancl �,rrm;ises c:unl.�inecl hcrci�i, lhi• ��;srti��:; ;:,;i4t: �s follu:�n;: 1. Puri-li�i_.� c;f. S_n.�-ic_q. '.Che C:uun�:il c1lj1U(:S lo p��rchasv ��ncl Lhe C;ily ayrees to Iw-ni:;h lhc� [ullowin�� s,�r•✓ice ;: ci) In::��c<�lion c?f hou:;inc� uniL::, I�) kc in:;�>��c.�li��ii r�f hnusinq unils:, •_• il�� ilti I11UIT'. I1�lOC1�1C�7��)' 1i�?� ltll�. 111 �it.'C�ll�il�•� �!U�J\V. � � L, I'ric'_..[or S��i_��i�_�;s_l?nrc:h,.i_se�l_. 7'he Gouncil ��c�ruc:; lo mt�l:e U�e tollowing � �>aymcnls [or th<: sen+i� ��, rcn I� rc�l 1 y thc Gily: ,�) Tn�li�il_ii�slx �.ti�>n '1'he Cotmcil agr��r.; Co �>tiy thc Ci.Cy an ins�>ucliori I!:�r, c�f up l� :'l.�l ��cr !inil lur unil� insJ;.:cic�i �iuri.nr� Ih;: lin�c cluriny wliich lhc pruyrt�ni is> Ucin�� or��tinizr.d ancl con�iucncc�cl. b) Cc�nCinuiii1_Pr��cn.�m._L';��mnnC;-' �I'he Council .igrecs to p��•>' [he Cily ciuriiiq thc lr.rm oI ti�is agreem;�n[ follo�;.iiig Che iniLial rrnf-up ��F �?��cii unil ti f.^.c of tv✓o dollt,r. (�2,(lU) per uniC per inoiilh (��r rr.-in;�!cction rcr{uir.^.d i.n connection wiLh fhc �;cr(or�n�nc:c o[ lhi:; coulr�ct. �_r's '{_ ���QI"IIl U� l��11`..•i`171i;111 . �1��1C :i�Ti"V1CC : �i? i`il j?lll'C�lilnUL� ilil[. (Ullll;i)1CC� lliltiFnl lhi.s aqreen�en�C sli�il.l cc�wrnence on July 1; 19i!S, anQ s1iaU conl.inue lixour�l. U��ceml�er 3] , 1Jt;b. '1'his ziyre,^.men1. inay be terminalecl by the Council upon LhirCy (30) days' v:rilt:�n notici� in Lhc evcnl F�royram fw�elirn.t is noC {�rovid��Q c�r is LenninaCecl hy HtJll. ln addition, Lhe CowlciL �nd Che Cily sii�i;l 1�olh have the ric�hl lo terminale this a<�re���n�:n[ ��t a�1;� tiine for causc Ly sul�mifLinc "!Cten notice of Llic inte�ltion to �lo sv to the o[hcr;�tut;� al'];_�ast nin^ty (9!)) J<�y:; � Lo LL•c :;�,�.ciliccl eflecCive daCe qf such Lerinin�ition. C<inccllation or LerminaCion � �his uc�rcernenL by ci.lhcr the Coun�:iJ or tiic CiLq siiall nul af�ecl lhr: riyhls uf p,,rlici����tiug (amf.l.ics �vi[I�in Che �CiCy cluring i:he tenns oi thei.r leascs. ,In c�d�lilio��, the (:iL}- e�ill l�e paicl (or services praic�rn�ed up Co Lhe d��le of Lhe Contract t�nnination cin Clie basi, seC forlli in Sactior, 'l. ahove, �l. 1?ry�ri;u_O!_]ig��tions c�f_(=i[��. 'I'he scrvi.ces to Le pc�rforniccl by U�e Ci.t;r uncter i:his program siia)1 Le as lol!o�vs: �Il_� )CCLID11 iill'.� 1"(:-111" )i!Cl'.iOtl O� 1tI11L5 :i�l�il� lI7l:lilC�� �717 O11—S1(J�lt . . 1--�---- --- _ - � -- J- _ --- i,�spi�ctiun ,�n:l ccrlilicafion oI thc suiL��i�ilit;� of. e�cli liousinrl uuil �?ri.i�r Lo initi,il l�'cisi� l�;' t� �>ar[ici�'��i[ing Iar.�il;� an�i t�lso lhe i'l'lllSj)Ci:ilUll lJI C:IC)1 IIULIS1i1Q UILC j)C101' �O ill]}' illllllli]] 1'C—Ci:iI1lIG1�1011 of lhc i��inil'; .��ny st:cli ins�,ucLion ::i�<.�11 bc ;u[ficir:ntl;� tliorouc�h tuicl c•um��lcl�� s�, ,is Lp insurc �l��cr�n!, :;<if�� ar��l s,inif�u� Iwusiny lin' �.ic�l� ��.irii�;i�r,�lin�� Itimil�'. Ilou�:im.� ��u�ilil, r;lancl,�rcl:; ;I�,�11 l�n a� :;cL f�,rlh in'I'i[ic ?�I, Ci�a�>lin-\jlll I'��rl .i;t'L.IUJ of Lhi� 1I1_11) i:c�;�ul.�lii�n:; tnu; L•� a�:��lical�l.• I:ui7c!in�� �,ucic�_:. I:,�E�orl:, of insp��c.tion cind re-in:;�,�_i;Cio�� sh�il! l�c nio�lc un lorms E�ro��iciccl h�� [hc Council, a sau���lc o( e.liich is r�tt,�aiiccl. . --� � �a:� ]n unl��r lo [u;ni:ch thc scrvici�s )icrcin {,urch�sc�l t�nc] proviclecl, lhc: CiLy sl�oll � �,rovi�ici ac?ci�u�itc ;t�fl tinic �nrl o(fic;� or ��roqn�n� s�i,icu t,nr! :;h,ill }:e�p lhc ::ame availai�le to �7�>I�lictinc:: clurinq scheduled busini�s:, hours ol�proverl L� Che Council_ 'I'lic (:ily sliull alr.�> i,ru��i�lc ti�l�:�yutiC^. s;i��ns .u;�l iliri:cliun;.il iri[unn<;Lir�n lo ;i����li- CiIIi�S clll(� j`ti5.'i]{1].C: flE)�J�lU�ltll.`; SU f�ll� L�li: �1��]�;C JIl(� 111�1111!`l' O� lilifill.11(� i1�1�1]1Ci1110R � c.in 1��� cusil�� t; :c�,;rL�iin;��l. 'I'hc GiL�� :.haJl l:ecp on huixl fr�r cli.slriLulion ,ulcq�i��lc> lirc�chtn'cs ��r othcr in(c;rni�iliui; rele��s�,.; ��rr•�»rc�i L; Ihr� Cr�uncil ,�r,�l rh.ill :;ui���lenicnC :;��i.�l F,rochuies v�Slh info.maLi.on�il reJccises conc�.-:rning local cic�l�ils as ��ppru�n'itile. '1'li�� nr,mncr o( turni:;hiuc� liu:s� :;crvice:; : h�ll be cln[enuinecl :�� ti�e C;i.Ly buC Che pa�-Lius shall Irnm iimc to tirnc conler conccri�irr� lhc c!utt�ils uI thc City's [urnz:;hinu o( fhe :.i:rvices anci Lhe Ci.Cy ar�r�es [o con;ply v�i[h reasor��ble demands of fhe Coun.r.il conc��rnin�� Uir. sa;uu. 11. is Ll�c inlr�nC of tl��� Cnuncil Co mainCai.n quiclolin::s fex Lhc: ret�sc,n��l�ly uniform ftu.nisLiny oI services l.�y [he s��vert�l ci.l�::s p,�rLii i�,��Cin, in tl��� <vrt�-';�i�i^ i�rngr�i;n :;o [hal :.rochures c.�n be prinleca t�n_i a((inn��Ci�,c marh.c[in�,� acLiviLics c��n be conductccl ou an �rca-�•✓icic l�.�sis. i. 1`rygrr�ni_OLli�ial_ion_;_oF Council. The p�irties unclersL�ind Cha[.the City shall »r�l I�c rcyui.r:�cl Co ��rn��i�lo th,^ Jollv�ving {nogram s::i-vic;c:; �nc3 �icfiviCics. S��id activiti.es are Che sol;: respoi�sibilily of. tl�e Coi�i�cil. � i1� nl� ill'B2)—WL�P: vJ�1CIllc7�.1VC ❑ii]CI:C:Cillt) <]Ctl'J1.[li::i SUC�1 t7S F)1"i`-�)clYat1011 � U[ �?I�OC�]lICCS arnl advcl'�ISlllq� C011iilC�l11 � ililil VJ01�:11IQ lNl��l �lIC�] COi?1111U.Ill.�j' QIUU[IS illl(� lC,'ll�d] ��IO])cl�tj' O-:+:1C1'S a17C� II1c717�lCjCiilUllt ci�'oups and c::piaining Lhe pirogram Lo Chcm. b) � T�lal:inc� f.inal det�rmin�ticns of p�rlicipation, issui.ny cr.rtificates cl f.inii.!y ��arficiE�ation, m��kin�� Lii.� housing assisL,ince p��S�ments Lo o�:��ners, c.i�lermi�iinq a�heCher Lo auLhoriz.:: eviclions, [�iid heariny c,ri,>v�,nr.cs or �����,lic�nts. c) Ap�>7i_o,�ti�>n ;�roc.^.ssinq incluclinc� a;sisti.n<� �:p�;l,ii:ai�t; to coinpletc �O1'lll;;� C�1<•Ci:lll(j ilil'1 •d�ll�)'I.II(J il���?�li:illl�.�:. 111CU111C` �tJ i:Ct(`l'll;lili? eli��ihilil�� for parliciF?ation in lhc ��ri?yr3m, cl��tcrniininu ��ii�n'upriatc dwcliinc; rtizc, �Jrus:; rr�nL �inr.l ciii�ss; ([�u�i.l;� �'onlrii;vtion tn Lhe rcnlol p;�yiu��nls, c::��J��inin�i L!ic riqht; �in�l rc;i�onsil�ililic::� in the �,r,,:�r�n� I�., >;uc:: r�ss��il Inmili; c, ��,�liu li,:vr L�•r:n i:.;u;,�l cr:�rLi(ic<�les arn.l u��on rc�yur.sC ot ❑ �;�iriic;i���ilini� lamil;�, .�ssist in ]��ctilinq SU1�a1ti�Q Llill�:i 1L ��1❑ �.I�V� C}:i11ll1.Illi1�( �G:IS�:S ul)G tOl�l1'iJflllll(J- ICi.I:iCS ��m..l llo�isiny Jlssisltincc Ptiy�ucnLs �:onLrt�cl l� ocruers for c:;ucuCi��n. � ..., . � . �'t� c!) lle4��rminin�� Ilir,l vr•iy losv in�;omc t�nc! ciflirm<ilivc; t�ction � �>rrr(e�r;ni:r.:; ,incl yuirlc�linc :�i�-e l�cinc� ccuri<��.! ouC o�S r�n ,�r����-wi�le I:��sis r�n<l mr,nilorin�.l tirr.��-wirJc ti���?lic��lic>n; fc�r �'�arlii:i��titiuii illl!: \�Vill�)llC) 1)5�.:� �OCJf.'��1CC lVl�.�l �15�:i Oi ilS'i11��1�)�Q fCll�il� UlUfti )1] �1flIC1 �O (I^.L{:1"IDlili: ilil`.' Il�`.f`.tI IOf C�:al��(�C:il�lUll (l� �'rlO:jf�llll �Ui7�Iti. � U� ��CillllJllt� �OI:O� ��IO<�I�cll❑ S�J�� ilil(� j)1'i'�lilr]IiQ U��Cl:il�lll(j �.l1�OChLCC;; i111C� �OLlI1S. . f) C%ollectin�.J a�ll �irr•�-�vi�1e cl��l�� unci ��rep,iring �11 i�ousin�.� assistance prqc�ram repor[s for IJUD. _ g) _ On-yi�inq ��ro<7rarn pr�,ce ;sin;� inrluc!iny �nnu��1 r.�-�:;�rlifictalion 01 tcn,inl:; r�ncl fh�� iu�in(en.ina� c�f �xogr,�m f;lns ai:il record•� for IIIU�I�II�\' 1'i:j.lOf�Si II1clAR�il1.1}lllfl ';p]1�i1Ct `.Vl{11 U�;•`I1Cl:i U�- f'c:11V_�?� U711L5 lo c�nc.otud�ya Uic;ir pt;rli.ci�,a[ion in �n<1 undersla�i�liruj i;[ ll�� proyram ancl mainL�ining 1Ssls of. avai.�a�L.� rcntal unils. . h) Al.l oChcr nicaticr_; contoiueu in [ha Mt:stei' Conlrtict. G. itepqrt, 'I'hc Ci.[y sholl docwncnl its [uinishing o( ;�,rvicc�s on t� n�onlhly L•osis �lithin Cr�n ctays r;Clcr Chc, r.losr, of c��h c�il+:ncl�3r mor�h. �ll cloeum:rni_��[ii�n � :i�lil]� �)i` c)Il �UCIIlS �11"UV)(.�(`CI �))' �'�lC (;ULllli:]].. ����iC �;UII��tJ{� f�i:9Q(\;i.'S iiiC' l]�i�IL �I-U11: � �1111C �O -t17llC �-O 81�C1 Ul �11qC1]C� i11� iJlI11S Oli lli'Ci?S:iiJl}� lll 6Ll�CC �O LJOLII 7.ilfOtlllil�1011 requir�cl l�y liliU or oUicr intormnLiiin rr�cessary to lhe Counr_.il ioc ils progr�in respi>nsil�ilific;. /- �.�._1J11F.: fl�_��ilj'_11C17��. �/�l� �)ily�lllh'll��S (Ol' ��li` :,.^.['UlC�'.:i I1Cl�`11] Uill'lJl�];ii'C� S�lil�� I��.: irr�clts �n a yutr,'lr_r1y i�t3s;:;. 'J'hc Cily iindcrstands Ch<it the Coun�::il cannol: irt�l:c paynu�nf:; unlil ancl unlcss funcis arc prc,vi�i�d I�v Iil,ll un�l��r Chc 1�-]aslcr Cc�nlrocC. tl. Rcc�rds, 'I'i�c (,c�uncil sl�c�l! hc�vc t�ccess W lh�• C:it;�'s r:,car:ls ,it r:ci son- ii�!l�.i {1t.�iP'S II1 �)I'tlifl�- ��(� �".'t`ii'::Si? J�3 1'i:S�i011:ll��l�l�j% li1 I11O111!O]" �I1L` '>�'!1-1::!'.5 �'lll'C'�1i15CCl. fl�l rccoris :;hcill Lal:�:�,t I:y l:�uth ��tnlius [or fi�;�� f��; �i�.ir:; I�r �:�icliL pur��u:�,;:;. 9. 'I'ir �xnli�:: sli.�ll c�vn�!1�� acilh t�ll rc��uic�mc•nL; ii:ii>oscrl 1��,�'i'!lli� G of [hc (:ivil Ri��hl:: A�•I c�l 1'�i�!, I'ul�!i�• l,�w ;;;;-; �.' 7; :;I.ilu;�•:: ' Il; Ih,.� ri•c�iil,i[i�_�n:: ol lh�: 1)�•��,ir!.r��ml uf I;��u:;iny ;itt.l .Irl���n 1):wolo��ni,nil istiur,:l lhc�rc�iur,l�n', 1.•1 CI'I� Sul:tiLJ<� /1, 1'�irl 1, S�:cfiun l. 1; 'L'iLl�. ��ili o[ litc Ci•✓il l:i�,l�l:� �\cl of 1Ji;'i ,ui�l Ih�� r�ilc>:; ancl ri:<;nit�lioi� ; i:suv�l pur�:u�inL lli<�rcl��; l;:;r.c:iiCiv�r i)n.i�:r 11 ni�:; lu Ih�: �irnf lh.il, in nc�.�<,rci�ince �vidi l.he� 11cC. Ihe I;:;ecuLivu Clrcler, lhe rr.���i]nCion�; om1 1.hc PC(�U11'i)IIICII�.:i� RU �:(!l'Spll ti�lil�l OI1 ��]!? IJC011IIt� Q� IiICi!� (.:O]��I'�UILCC��, IUlI�)]Ull� Ilil�lOililf �• ... .ia.--�r .. �3 �ori.yin or •;c::, I,rr r,:;cluclr.�! frc�n� 7r�rlir..i��olion in, vr I�u �:I��nird the Lci�cfits; uf. [hc �IUU::)11':1 i15;:;15�,.111�:C ���1`.�IIICRI�G ��Y<��jl�l;il OI' �?C C::f1)UCiCC� lCUltl (:Ill���tij�lili:ll� OI' li�J i)I:�1CC— tvisc suhiccl�.�il lu cli�;c•riinina[iun. i��o ����r::c�n ::l;r,ll �iulcnnalic��ll�� L•; c>:rinriccl from �i�irliui��,itic>�i in <ir I�c �I�:niurl Ilic L•ciu:fil:; ol lh�e fio�t:>in�� assir;ltincu ���ipmcr,Is �11U(JCill❑ (I7 �;f`. :4LI�)��:C�.C(: ��i [�)ti�_f�II11Ul<l�lvil 117 C111���rr)'IOCII� �il!Cilll.`iC O� IIICIII�)�'.l5ill�1 )11 �. i] C1ilA5 tillC�l il:; 7.I711il�lll'1i;(( Ill0��1�.`f5� l�i,`C;1�)ll:Il�!i O( ��1I�:11C: l:'.`�(i]IC� C�(:. ����1C•�i• f�Yilb'151L`Il:: �il'l' Jlit:'�U�.I.^.�� j1iJ1"iUJil< <O ��1C IO[Jl:��I�iOREi OI �I1�: ��Cjkll�-Illl`llt p[ ��flU.`;111(j i111[I �.II.'�)clll �)f::'JL`LOJ)fill.!I]L Ol'IG LI'li? 1'�:l{U11r�IIiQ11C:: OY :iJ][I �JC:�)iifL!IiCIIL �l!11":Uilil� �.il SJfCI r;.c�ulatio;isr, tnxl lhn ol>liric�liuns ciI Lhc Cily [o coiuply lhcrcv�ilh inurc:; to [lt<� Lcn�:fil of fh�_� I)ititc�l Sl��l��s, Ii�c s��ici I)c�n�rfnicnt tinrl thc C:otincil, ony oI ���l�icl� sh�li he r.nlil.]er.] f�r'inv��;:e ��iiy miim.:lics ��vail�il>lc I>y lci�v Cu rc�lress �ny l�rotich lh��r�.,��i nr lc, ccin�•r:l ci�mpliancc� :ii��ri:�,villi i�;� lhr; (;il, • lll. S��li,cn�ard_u,l_crlicii[.in(cnm;�fic�n_ 'Tlt�: us.� or �lisclu:n�re by t�ny ��arC, oI iiiiorm�iFioit c,��nc,^_rniny an ti2���lic��i;t or p��rCicip��n[ in [hc nrr���r�ini in vi<�I��lion o[ +�n�� rule o[ con(i�l;m[iali.ly oc for tiny pu; pose nut directl; connc:cLed �vi.Ch Lhe aelministraCion a[ thr. �uur�rim i; prohii;ifecl, e;;cept on �vriLfen conse�;l of lhe t�����lict�nt or ��t�� Lic�ipc�nL. I l. AJJ scr',�it;�,s ftu'ni:�h��d unclr. Chis llgrcem�n[ sh�,lJ Lc wilhoi�[ ch,�rc�c Lo dny ����?liconl or ��artiei����linr� [��mily, • I l. AU �;rolil�:in:; or .iis��ulcs Uct�vicen tiic ��arli��s st�al I I;c stibject Lo rc�vic�a� r�nrl rc�solufion hy Lhc NloLrc,�,,,1iLan ]lousi�ir, anci R��cic±vclopnir�n[ AuCiiori.t� /1�iviso�y Corumiltec or othr_•r coinmi.ftne sub�ec;uently ciesicjnaleci I�� tiie Gbi�ncit. 1;�. 'Ch�: C:il�; in ac�:or<lc�iicc �vi[h ils sttifus i�s on in�ie��cn�lont c.c,i�Lr.iclor ��yr�.x,� Cli�.�L iC •n•il1 co���luet i1sr,JC cunsisCenL wilh sucii sl.�LUS nr,c! Cii�t i1 v✓i11. nr�[ !!ulcl ils,�li oul or c!ui;n [hal its o[ficcr; tind em��l��yces tirc em��l��ycc::; o[ LI1C CiOUilC:7I. fij� tO(150l1 IlCi'Cp�� 1L `.4'III 111i1I:C I]D Cl�l]Cl� (I�:Il;�lll(I UI �l�)�JfICilLli)I? LO 01' �OI �IIIY C]c.��1C�01- �9�J\'l.)i:q('. �]ii�?),I�ii�;jC LO lll`: O[[1CCC O;� [7171j1j0J'i'Q O� ��lc �iOl:I1Cl�� 7.i:l:�U:1111(�� �11.1�' IIV� �illll�,J(� ��t)� l\'UI"�:Illilil�:i-CUII11��:ii:�:il�lUl1 CO`.:i:l�llJi) . U11Ci11���0):!11<..'I:� 111tilIl�IIiCC �!(?11C�1�5� SQl'lil� :iCClll"J�`,./ CUVL'!'ili�f' pl 1'i'�l.tl]III�;U� li:l!fll�)L`IS�llj? OI' C:l•(il�. 1•I. �_I,�::I�v t:�mlrni_[. 'I'In� Cit�� nncicr.:l,iucl:: fh.if lh�� ��rixn�iu i:; sul�jc.�l lu Ih�� lorm�: ,�n,i crnn�.ii'.!�,�i:; , I. Ui�� i.1ns!:�r U��nlr;ii•l i���l�•,;.•,�ii Ihc� <;uun�. il .uui IIUI) c�m! lo Ill�l�':; currenL �irni fulun.� rulc; tind ri�,ulalionr; ��ncl thc (;ily a;.7r�i�•: Ir� oi,i<i�� �`)� ��Il' :lilln(T di!tl �.i� UILI))r:i'ill:l: �:dl��l �IIi` �.U:Ii1C:11 ifl 1�5 CC)I11J)]1�.11]CC ��ICIQ7V1��7. �.' �lF ta� y I�o meml�cr, officc�r c�r ciu��I��Yr'i� o[ lhc Cc�uncil, n�� mciniv,r o( chc c�uvcu'nin<� >>od nt lhn J.r,c,�lily (city and counlY) in tivhic:h tLr, rnpjcr.l is situ��tcci, �incl no olher � �nil�lic.�:o((i�:ial c>f ;nii:l� lo;�uliCy , Y re�s��oiisil.�ililir:; �.�illi ru:;p��cl i��c� Jocnli.lies whc� e;;,:rr.i;;es r�n� /tnirlions or • Lfi,: Llic Projecl, ilurin�� his [c:n �;ta[fc�r, sli,ill h��",� ure c�r 1� ��ny in!„���.cl: �r c;nr.• yn��r . •�nY I'rocr�uc)s or L„n�:fiL:; ,�risinq [1u:re(i�ou c,r indiree;L, in fl'�ic rcmlra<�C r�r in ( 1N V�'1'17�:1:5,5 'v'✓IfI;I;CC)I', lhe �,�rLie:; hr,iel-, hace cause,l tliis r�groen;eiiL !.0 be e;:eculec! �u Ll�c: cl<�y ,�nr! yccn� [irsl �l.,uvc: wri[fen L Y Ll���ir �utl�orizcd r;;��resc:uftili��es. ML"1'1101'O].,.I'i'r,i•� �;OlIiJC;TT.. 13y np�xoved as Lo lcyal torm c< adec3u�cy C"1TY OI' 1'oncst ll, iJo.vlin, Ir., Stalf Gou,is;�2 — �_ y. � amu a � Chairrnan ----- - 0 r,,�i:'rrc�i�c�i.i'rr..d c:c�iird�,ii, F� i)UI•.' .�l�ll Nli`lJV i)(�UJI'i` ��111��1111�1� ���llll� ��Jll�� �'�I1111�!:7ti�J >:��Ill � sr.crric,^: �, iicn�si��;;;n:;si,�ir,���c;i: i�����r-ii:r�rs i��ioc;�;na, i uc�i�•riznc;�r �^,�rrii N�uraicri�n�.,rr�� 'I'IIIS /1C;1ZCI;i�!I;iJI', ��ril.rr�:�l ir.l�> �is uf I:hi : �I�i�•, tlic ----...-------cl[.i� u[ ._..____.______.�� I�,�[tv��en Ihn Nlctr<,��i�liL,in Cuiini;il �hcrc�int�[lr�r i'rfi��i:�il fo <�s tlic U��un�'il), on�l lh�� Cily c�l __----' (hrn'r�in+�ft�n- refc:u-ecl io �ia lhc l;il,). W T'f ��I;SSI;'f 1 I: Udif1:ItI;P,S, Uiu �:cnuicril inC��n�ls lo �_mdi�rt��!_�� � E�ri�r��'�tnt of sui;siclizinq renl pt�}�ments �i)1' �O�VCI' lill:'J!11C �d)i:l]li.'.`i �]11(� �iJl ��1�T t?�ii'.I'�� �.O i1SSl:i� ��-IlClll ])1 (�j)ii3111111<j i](��::(�Ui1�C �lUUtill)O� .71:�1 ' Vditr,r.Lns, the C;c,unc�il has r��ceivcd (iuxling from thr: l!nilcil SL�Ie:� I:)e,�,�rtmenL of li�,usinr� �:n<I l;rl�t�r; 1]evelu��nu;i.l (1iUll) uncier a 11U1) Seclion �l llousicu� �\ssi:;l�nce Pti�menfs Proc�ram Aq��slr,Y�nnuol Con[rihutions Conlr��ct �l'=asCer ConLr��cLl doled to acC as a Public Ilousinc� Arency to irn��lc�n<�nt this progra�n, anc.^------_.� � N'I�I;ItIiAS, fhe Ci!, has; l�y re�:ol.ution in�iicalec! ii.s c3esir�� lo par[ici��afa in Chis pro�;r.uu anci Lo assis� suc.h iniiivicluols an<.l familics tu ohlain decenL, safr'. a�:d st�ni[�ry housing in Che City at �>ricc:, tii�y can �Iforcl, anil �'1�l�I;ItI�I\i� l:lC ��f?1111cJ� [.jC511['S I.O �!UI'C;IiiSL` Ci:l'Lii)il I7CC�::Sill�\/ uc�lilJi71.`iLYiIL1VC S6'1'VLCCS IrUm lhc City in cc�nnc:cl:ion ivilh c�rr}�iny otit lh�: �>royitim ��ncl, 41'I(CI<I:�1S, fiu� Courn:il is au[i�orized fo c:•:.�cut�: c�n agr+_c!r,cnC for li;c purch�sc oi �IIU:JI'il�ll 5�`1V1(:CS <)11C� �O �J�:C i.11l i3(:�li)Il SjlCC1�!Ct� LlC Ciill��.C:111�1�F3tC:� �1..`I�C.111 j�i1I5U�111t Lc� L<iw�:; If'•"r>, Cii���;lcr 13, Seclion (i, Sui�cL 3; Suctiou 'Ll, Suixl. 1; ,in�:l <<.icfion 'L�;, t�n�.l h.�s �lll u( LCii� E'�owcrs anc; duLi,�s uf a hou�;iuy cincl rc�iuvc,jr,�,nir�nf [iuliiorily pui :n.�,inf lc, Lti•.v; lJ7i�, Ch,i��l�rr l3, 5���.tion ;'.�i un�iur Lhr. pro:-i:;i�,ns cif lhi� �iu;�ici��,il II�>u:;in�.� ;ind It,;ile�-clu�>;nonl /1ct, �•iinni�s�i:;� iltilules :icrliun I�,;'.l l fo ��(� � r i'� �� �llll� i1�:�5 ilil!l'`IJ:��1�-t11)' ��1�?lCt)(: 1vU4Y, 7'lll:ltl:fOi:l:, ii� �on:si�.i;�i,.�liun o( lli�: iuu!ual co��em�nts tii�J �,cuu�i.ses �:onlainec! :. hcrrr�in, lhc ��orlics .i��roi: .��� Ic,llu�vs: l. Ptir��litisc c�f S��r��it�c�. '1'hc Cotmc:il t�yri�es to ��uruii�isc an�l lhc Cil�- �iyrces to [itrnish lli�� loJlo•.��in�i scr�•icc::: • - • ,�) 11�i�,lic.+.liun ��rucn:;:'.inrl. 1.�)`•. In:������:lic,ii ��f liu��:;in�� >>ni[:t, c') Ott-•�t�irnJ i�nn�r,ini ;nr�r.r:;�;ii;�� r�irl r��-a�rl�(ic,tfii�n, �U I±u-iiir,����cli�.�n �,� lu�c:;in�� �inil::, nll �is mu�a ::�,ucifi::,ill�• :;nl �;ut iii Scclic�n �1 ba1o�+�. � �-, <� 7.. 1'ri�;r:_(r•r.S�_ryic_eS.Piirc•lin_;r�l_. 7'hi� C;uunc;il t�yrc�es to rnal;c lhe followip�J � p��yn�i•nls (ur llic ti ivic�:s ii.ncfcrecl hy L!ir Cit.y: ;�) SI,�rC. n�� �;,�y�n�:nls. 'fhc C�>unci] agrces lo p�iy (r>r co�ts auc] tincl �;r..rvircrs o( li�ia (;ily incuneci in con�iucli.r�» c�iUi fhc c,r��anir,ifi.on cuu! cOnuncncc�mi,nl. uF ci�nCricL scrvices whii�h �rr: r��in:bws��l�le tu ti�c Cr,uncil I>y thr: ])cp�rinienl c>( 1!uusiny an<; lJrii��n Devnlc>pmcnt ancl ��nrecs t:o p,iy nu n�orr� thon $•1,2(30 lor lh:,s�: sC�rl up co>[; aiul :;enric��s. Vdillzin Lhi.s �n�xiinu�t�, ll�c Cuuncil shall ycncrt�ll� b�: tit�lc Lo poy no more Chatt ;[i;30 ner n;onfl� for lhe orqaniz�Cion onJ caiunencemenC of. applicaCion procnssin�� >ur��ices, which ser,,,Jces n��i/ htive b;�en unclrrl��!:en �)IlU1' LO I.�li: l:��i',Cl.1V(' (�ciL!: i�� L�ll:i Cic)I"l;Cll1C'ill ilili� S�lil)1 CUl:I;)U�I(: . WI1C17 IiU}.15t,.111�:1cJ1�?r �l]� Of i�1C• ]i11�Li1� j)I'�J(Jl'�llil li.'i.ISLti �li1VC UCC`17 lll'�]I1lif:(�, /��15p li�iilllil ��ll:: 111i1;�;i11PJlllr ��i13 LOt.IliCil S�lii�.� O�= cfcncr�lly al�Jc; Lc� ��a� no n�orc thon SSOU tor Ch� purc,hase of non- expcnx_lablc ecuipment (or usc in the prugram. b) ]ni:ial ins��erli_on. In r�ddilion �o Lhe sL�irL-up m�::in�u�u set out abr�ve, lhe Gouucil shall pay ll�e City an inspection fee o[ up to ti:?:1 per unit Ic,r unils insp��cLed durinr Lhe tinie during �vhich . LIl�� �.110C�1'C3P.t 1S 1�i:11iiJ� (31+}l1IlIZ(4<� l3}CL (:OI11I11C1lt:C[i. ic) Conf.inuin<L��ro��rc�m p<�_�meni_s., '1'he Council a9recs tu ptiy the OitS, � di!riu�� lhm terni of Lhis a<�reewenC {ollo�viny thc iniLiul rent-up of a�c:h unit ti fer_ of six clollars (�>G.00) p�>r unit per inonlh for re- cerlSfi��tilions i��c�uire:l fn Lhe perioi'mance of this conti.�ct and a [c�: o! lt��o di�llars ($'I._li0) per unil �ier monU: lor re-inspection nnluircrl in conncctiun �viLh thi� �>urfonuouce ut this coi�tr��r,L. � 3. 7'ri-n� qf I1rin.rer�cmL, '1'l�e sei'vices to b�� �,urchased and tiirnishr_.�l ui�dcr this agre��inent sh,�1J con:mencc� on July 1, 1�75, and shall conlinue Cluough Deceinber 31, �1";;U. 7i�i5 a�,;i,:ui;i�:nt n�ay I.�e lc�rmintil��,] i;y the Cow�cil t�pon lhi:ly (30) (�il�ti� ',ti'l7�fi::i 1?U�]C�= lIl �.I7C ;'.VCII� �>l0<jl'al!❑ JUI:.�111CJ ].5 Il(:1[ Jil'OV1(3i:(� Oi� 15 �CCl:lllldti'CI I�;� IIUll, ln ��.�?ciili��n. [hc Coui�ciJ ❑r�ci lli�� l�it�; :;h��ll'cutli h�i�„c t.h�, riqht to tr;ii:inale Lhis ,���rc�cin�,i�l nf ,in)• finn: fvr c�iu.^,�� l,; :;ul:mi.11in�l wrill:�n nulicr� ��I :hi; inCenfic�n Lo �1�� ::c� i�� thu �.�Iln�!' �airt�, �iL le+ist ni:ic!��' (`)i!) �l.iy:; �,ric.�r Iu Lhe s��.�r,ifieci e1(��cfive clute uf suc:h !:n'i;iin<<lioii. Ctinc:�liaLinn or �crini.nalicn ol Ihis ���.irr�cmc�nl hy ciLhcr ih�> Cuimi�il ��r tlir� (:;il.; :;i��ill not cil[rcf tiic riyiits of ��tirfici��t;linc; �oini]ic:; wifhin fh�: Cil;� clurirn,� Uie lrrin; �,f Lhi�ir jr.nr;ns, tia a�tdiliun, lhe Cit�, ,.vill l�e [�t�ic1 [c,r ;:ervices p��riorn;cil up lo Cii;; cir�fr. of fhc conlr��cl Lcnr�int�l_ion on Lhc I�<�cis s�:t fcxUi in SacLion 2 cil:ovu. �� _•i.- •1. I'ruc�r,ini_(lLli,�,�fi�:�n�, o.f. C;i[}�. '1'hc services to be perfurn�eii l.�y [hr: C;ity uncicr lhis {�rc�c�raro ::liall l�c us Ii,llu�v:;: �'x �'B • ��) �111?]ir.+ifion..)rrocr_s_:ing_sh:�ll includ<:, 1>ut not Uc liiuit��d Co, ti:i:;l5ilil(� il�)�.+I1(:illli�.:i �:11 Cqlll�)I(?IC �OI�1115� C�1C�1�.:11(I �lili� VCL'I�j'i111I a;q�lir�,iut't, in�•omi� lo Qelcnnini� clJc�il�ilil�� fc�r �;,�rlii:i�xilion in tlir. ��roc�rnu�, clutunniniilq ❑E���r���n'i�ilc �h•:rllinri :;iz. , qres:; rrnf tind c�rot;�: f,unily contril�utin�� I.o tlii� rc�n[��1. �,a;�nicnls, c4:��lreinin9 lhu ri��hts ancl responsibilil.ic� in the pro�Jratu tr� si��ccs5fi�1 Itunilies �vho h��vc bcen issual ccrtificafcr, ancl u�;un rcr�ursC of a. parCicij>d�ting f,�n��i1�, as5i:;t in ]ocating suil�bl•� ur.ils in th� City, exomininr� lcoses and for�vording ]eascs and ]iousin<� Rssist��ncc Paymenls Cnnlrocl [o ocvi;��rs (c�� �::<ecufi.on. 'I'h�:� Gity sl-�,ill {�c �,rini�iril�; r,:::�>onsiblu fur lh�� accuracy of informoli.on rel,�tiny Lo � dll <l}>�)�]C�lll�:�5 E)1'Ol)1'C?Ill Cll�jl�?1�1�'y il?]C� VCl'I�JCt1t1U115 dR(� il�?[)�l.i:c]' Liqn sht�l] bc m,icl�� c,n tnnns providecl L;� [he Counci.l, samE�ies o[ wFiicli are a[Co�.liccl h�:reto, b In_, ��:�clion and rn-i�is?�ctic�n uf units shntl inclucic �in on-siqht ) L.------- ---- -�----- inspectioii and ccrtificaCion o[ Uie suitabiiity of �t���ch housing unit prior to initi�l� lease by a par[ici2�aling t�mil� an�l a]so the re- inspection of ca�h hutisiny uriiJ: E�rior lo anp� tinnunl re-certi(icaLioil of I:hr; I,inii.l.;. I�ny such ins��cc[ion sliall {��� :cu!(ir..i�nCly ihurough illl(1 CO171��I��iC SO <75 �O lll:iill'C C(i?Cl;l)�� tii]�C i111:� 5<)Ill[ill�' �'IUU51.ilCJ � � for c��ch }�arlicip��tiny [��niil•�. 1lousin�� c{u��lit}, �lan�l�rcls shall he as se[ forfli in'1'i[le 2�, Chti�,ta' �'lI] P�rt i?fi'L.1D`: ot the IIUll RequLaC9nns and l,/ ap��)icoi:le I.,ui1<linc� eocle:;. Reporls o( i.n�;pecLion �i�<1 r�-i.ns��ection ;hall 6e ma<l�a on (a'ms ��rovicir�rl lr/ [he Council, a sain��l<� o[ �viuch is a[tachecl. • C� C711-c p7111 )]'Oi71'illll JIOCC£SIII! :�1i111 Ai?CIUC�C cil7llUl1 IC-CCl"LlI1Ci]L1011 _..1_ J--�-----�-------J_. ot Ci:nt3i�Cs and th,, n:aintenancr of proyr�;m files and records for monlhly rcporfs, mairtai.niuq cunL��cf �vi[h o��:ncrs cif n�nt��1 uniLS (o en;;quraqe Lhcir partici�»Lion in �ind tnxl..rslaniiii�g of Ih;� �>�oqrain ilil(1 lililltl�81.11111(J �1.i�5 O� i]V.71111�?]C' I(-:Il�ill lllll�ti. . Jn ordcr lc� furnish tlic scn'uic:c�:� licrcin ��urchar.r,�l, lhc (lily shal] prcn;icic u�:lnyiinlc slo�C Liiuc� t�nil oltii�o� i,r �,rogram s��oec tin�l sh;ill Lr.np Ilin �„�in�� ti����il�ililir lu �i��plic�iiil.s clurinci sclie�lultcl husirn�ss hi�ur:; ������rovc�l L}• llin Council. 'i'li�.� UiL;• s;h;ill :iir.c,.�mi���i�lc• a�!.^.[�u�,G:• si'ii;:; c�nu �',ircctioic�l inlr�rir,ilion to �i,:��IiconL., .i,�,l pos:;il�lc ���,�,li�:.���ls sr lii,�l llia ��l��ci� .,nci iucinricr ul m�il:iuc� a{�elic�ili��n c�iti I,+� easil� tisc:erttiined. 'I'he Ci[y sht�ll )tr.�,�� on hancl fur dislrihulion .�ciequ.ele l�ruciiums <�r i�lhcr inivnnaliun rcicascs��no{�oreil I?;� Ihi� Cuu��c:il ai�ci sh�i11 .siiE���l::ur��nl �;��i�l �)IOC�llllv'ti 61'L�.�1 111�01'lil�l�l.pil�]) Il?�l`il.`iCli CC)Il(:CCI7111iJ �UCJ1 (�C�ill]5 i15 il{)J)10{�l-)i]�C. *"'�-`� : , 'fh�� iut�nii•"i r�f luu�i:,hiiu.J lhe:c s��rcii;c:s slinll l�e delermined by Lhe Cily but ll�c • p.:�ili��, :>litill fr��in limr. fo [imu conf��r c;onccrninc� flic Q�il�ils <,f lhc Cil.y' ; fuinit;l�inry n( thc ;��n;i<,c: tincl !h�, Cil)' .���rons to ci�ni��l,� �n�ilh retisont�blc dcunt�nds qf lilc Cc>tut�,i.1 conc;trni�i�J tiu: sain!�. !t i:t Ilic inLnril. o( llx� (.:oinx:il lu inriinl.�in yui�L�lir�r�:; lur lli�� n:.�sunnhl�� i�ni(orni (�irni:;l�in!� <�( services I,y lh�� secc;r;il ciLies �41f�1Cl�l�1�111!1 III i.�l(': ill�•'�1'-bVJfl/• �ilO�jl�illll .`f0 ��lilt f�ll!L;�IIIfC'ti ('ill"1 �_'�' �rl'Ill�i(� lI1C� il��lllliil(.):+l? Illill�:�:�lllr) �IC�IVIi!!:5 Cilll �?'.'- CD11��llCiCl� Oi1 i.11l i1I1)�l-`.'1jr�U �;a?:iLS. I;, prc�c,i..���n_Ul�l.i<�tili�,ns; <�1_C:uunc il,. 'Chc ��,�rCics un�lcrs[�uiii tii�t lhc: City shall no[ l�c rc�c{�_iiic:cl �i� ��iu:�irlc I.hc• [��llowin�� ��rc„�ran, ::;crvicr:� t�n�.f acLi��iLir_s. Said �ictiviCics t�rc fiic,sol�, rr,s��onsibili.ly oI lhe Council. il� %iI� i)1'i!ii''.NJ��i` ili�Jl'ilidll�iC' II!i1li:L?LI:1�_� <]('I-IV)LiC> SlIC'Il d5 �)I'1'`�1�.1ldL1011 li� �)fUr;illll'i.!S i�17(i U[�'i�_'f�15111(7� COII�-ciC�1.11[j �711<� '•.�/OCf�.)1-I(J rVll�l i:!(.'i] � rt(l:lli!IUIU�:" (.iCC!Ll�):: i111(1 li?[IC:lI IlilJl'i.'1Cj' Ob\�1lCl:i iilili ❑1a11liitlClOi`li� CJIOLIJ)S illl�� Ci:�`�al111111O �IIL` jt!"U(jTillll �G` ��K:ill. � . b) f✓aking [inal cletenninotions o[ E>arlici�:dition, issuin<1 cerLific��tes oI (ililll;r' jlLII��SCIj1�1�.1Ut1� 111J�:i{V(j �_�li �lUlltilll�) LIS>1.5�'�]i7C:(` �i�'�+Itll.'.11i:ti t0 � pFVIlCCS� C�C�I`llill.:llllfl N�:�P'.�.�1Q� �U illii-�lOI�1.::C C:�1C�10]]Ei� i]]1(� IlCi3f�111(J �)Ilf��.:ill?i't;S i�l� ii:>�]�IC1;11�:�. � ' ti� ��CiC•L':I;Jilillf) �.�1<1['1C��� �U:'.' lll<.'('iliv.'. 111)C� J��11'.^.lil�:'•.'r' Jt'{I.UtI �J!'i:�.l'fC17;:C'.S � � .. d111�� (.Jlll(I/:�117C:i ill�C �)C117•7 �'�.�1'F1f��� �Jli�. C��l alll c11!?il'"i+iltir� �:i]Slti il!1(� �,��,�Siluriii:� �i},�c:-�:;icii� ::�•:�'i..�liuii:; lor ���irticipatio�l <�n�l �,�c�itinc� . �]S�A �UU'.:i.�1L`I' Vdl�-�l ] L:+�S C� O'.'':71�i?I:lc: t'�•»t�il. t��7ils lIl bf(iCl i0 (1:)tCCllllfli? . . illlj: 1-iCC�I IUI" fi]i1jIOC�3i1Vll OI j?IOi)l'i7171 JllIlC�S. C�� ���1i11J1117(J �U'.`.al� 171'G;Il�a7111 SlLi!i r.11l(� �tl'Ci�lE1Y!I1_j (J�J^iil�ll��.l �:10C;�-IUCCS t711C� �UI'I;l:i . ' - ('.� LJ��(`C�III�( il�] ill'CJ-7ilU'= ��i]��J �Illl� jq'.-:I��_il�i!IC] al] housin;7 i1S`:1:iii717CL' �?iu.�raui �'� ��nrts Ior i!f�l). f) All i>thctr m�illcr:; co,il.�i!ic�.i i�, !i��� P�ln:;l.+,r ConLr<!cl. 1�. ��t'��i�l':_ ���Il��: l:l�.\ `i�IJ�� ��Ui'iIIP�`Iti il.; iUl I11�!llli�i t!� ..�`I�\'li'�.`:: �`.1 .] I'!i1I1�.�1�}' �)i151ti \Y1�.�]:li �!111 �!�l;%:i il(�CI' �Ili? /']p9i�` itl i:il�;�l C..1�C!l�lll[ ❑:i?I'f�ll. /��l (It.)Cl.lillf.'l1�cI�:Q!1 sh,ill I�c on funn� ��rr�vidorl l�y [Lc Co�incil. 7'iic Couni:il rnsr.rv:.: ; li��, ri<ihL ;ru;n 1111;!.` ��U �lilll: �V ail�t:l� i)f i1111C11f� il�� �Jf01'i i�1; Il!'CCS'iill')� 111 OI'ilQf �O ll�llll Ill�UI'lllil�lUl7 reytiirc�cl l,�,� IIUll ur c,Uii:r ii1(orm��lion uccc:�;���ry tc> thu C;c��u�cil fru it:. ��ro��r;�n res��on:;if?ililii�s. � - �-.v ' ��'7 7. 'I:imi�_ c�(_i!�i��rn�.iit,_ 11tl ��.�yrn±�nl:: (or Ihc; s;r.rvir.crt h,�rcin ���.n-i:hosccl sl'i�ll � In� intxic r�n �i yu.�rtc il�� I,cisis. '1'iic Gil��+ tnufcrsl�iitc:s lhat liie (;ouncil c��nnot mo}:e pr�ynrc�nl.s unlil anc! unlc �s f�incls are �xovi�led Ly ]lUl� uncir��' [hc lvl�isler UonUoct. 8. It��r;i�nl.,: 'I'ii;� Uounci] ;;h,ill li<ivc� ac:cr�;a [u llir. i;ily's; r��cc,r�.l:; t�l rcason- � ilI)If:� IlUlll";i Jll i)flll:l' IU Ci;i`i1:15(` li:� I'i;:;��U11::1I)II141r LO i1101llL�)I" �ili: 1;i11t�1CC:: �?iil'C:�1i1 +L'(1. All rr:cor�ls sh,�ll t;�: C���,I. by i�o[h p��rlic; [or livc (:i) )'c.irs for �iuciiC �>ur��osirs. �. '1'Y�r. ��nrfies sh�ll coru�.�ly v�ilh a)1 rcquiremcnCs itnpose�l L•,- '1'itle 6 of th�: Ci.��il Riyhls AcC of 19G�1, Pul.�lic 'L2��n� t�i;-3`i� 7i� Statutes 2•11; Che rec�ulaLluns of Che 1>c����rh��ent n(.liousinr� �i»cl Url�tin llevclopr,;enC issued I.h�reuncler, I•1 CI'R Su1�CiClc !�, P�irl 1, S,:�fion 1. t; 'Ciflc V111 ot lhc C;ivil Righls /1ct o( 19u8 and ihe rulc; �tn:l rcc;ul,�!iun� i:�,suc;l pursu�inl [h;:reLo; l;;;r.cuCivc Oc�!c�r 1IUG? Lo lhc c�ncl [lir�t, in (i�;c ur�.i :nca �.vitl, LIi�� Act, Ch�.� 1::;��culiv�, Or�li:r, Lh�:� r�;yul��fiuns ,�ncl I.ilc � 1'l:ijLlll'C!IiC11C5, ilU ��CI�SU11 $llil�� 011 li]!, <f!'UUlll� � iilCi?� CU101, CIUCr�, 1'C)1:�IU11, I7c'1C1011c]] orir�in or ;c>:, bc n;:clu�3cc1 fro�;i {�arficipation in, ur I�e cli,nicd Ur� LonafiCs of, the ho;isiny asaislani:e ��a, rnenls proc�rarn or be e::cludecl froni eti;��l<�yn���nC or Le other- wise sul�jec[eci lu di::;criinivation. I�o person ;htill c�utun�alicolly be e;:clude�l from �nirtici�,a(ion in or be cleniec.l the beneCits o[ [he housi.rn_� t�;sist��nce �>ayments {iroy�-�im r,r V;c sul;jecCecl tr� discrimi.nc�Liun in emplo� inent hec�use of ineml,ershiU in ti cl<i�s suc.h t:s unir.t�n-iccl rx�Lhcrs, rc�ipicnts of �>uLlic wr:)G�rc, cic . 7'hc:;c �?rovisions arc: inc)i.ulc�i ��tusu�nl Lo lhc rc<.IUlalions o[ Lhc llc�parin;enf of llo:ising c1I1.� �il�lilil ��ilPC.`�U�)!1:C:R�: i]!ll; �i1C 1�C(�lIlIC111C11�; (11 .'ii�)�� �.�i!�)�If�li1011t jJUi'SU<7Lt �O Si31(� . 7cyuloli.ons; an:3 ti�ebhJirJ��lion; ot Lhi: Cily Lo con�ply tnerewiCh inures lo Lhc L<�nc(il uf Lltc li�;itucf SCcilc,, Che sai�l tJc�},artmenl tinrl Ll�e Coimcil. ��n,� of w�liich Sllil)� }JC' C11�1��C�.� �p 117VC)r:L' illl�� I�i:l::(:C�1CS iiVi11�i1E:�Q �?j �ci'.N �O ICC�I'C;SS i]Il}' L[CuC�I tiPicrco[ or to com��c1 com��lioi�cc (hcrc�vi.lh by fhe City. 1��. .SiiLr+<�Iliil'i�.O� i'�lL'il�. I.11�i)1'i1L1t1i)il: ���1C US�.` OI� f�l.`�CItJ5111'Q �)\r i117j� �)i1l�V O[ 111�OI'Illil[I.Cill t'OIlc'.i.'Clllllt� ilil ilj)�1�1Ca]Il� Ol' ))u`C�IO).})i)il� 1.11 ��li: �)I'U�jl�ilill LIl b'lU]il�i011 Of ��;i;� rulr� o( c��nticlentit�lil�,� nr fa arr,� E�ur��o:;e nol �.lirc:cUy eonneclecl viith Lhe ,�cfiiii.nislraPicm ��I il��: pr�.qr��m is �>ri;hil:ilccl, e;:cr,�>t on writCc�n c;o;�sunC o( Clir: a��plic�;nf cr �i,;rficii,unt. 11. T�Il s�nvi;�.�s furri;;l;c,ci tnicicr Lhi:; r\n,rccri;r�i�t :;htiil b�� �viLifout i:n�nc�:� lp �ii�y a��plic��n[ i,r �,�irLici�,nlirn..� loiuily, 7:'.. All i�ro;�lcins: nr �ii:;�,ulc:> i�cl�v�:�rn lhu �,arlir�� :;li,i11 I,r: :;ui�jr:ct lo r�tviuv� ��nr; rc:;��lufi�:,n I�� Ih,� nl�,lro�,ulit<';n Ilous:inc� �,n�i Itecl��vcluE,iii�:ul /��iIJ����riL; 11c1��i:;c�ry C%i!roinilli�i� ur �>ll���r c r�inniiLli�c� ::ul�cc��uenlly �?osiqnol�.�cl 1�;� Li,c C:owuil. � �--. l.',. 'ChC C;iLy in c�ccr�rcl,iticC wiU� ils sl,iCUr t�:s �n in�lcl�:'��dcnL contr.iclqr cuarcc. lht�l il �vil) c:on<luci: il:sclf cc�nsistenl wilh siicli st�itus �ncl lh;�l it �vill ., rio[ hul�.l i.lsclf oul or c,l��ini Y.hoC ils ufiicurs t�nd c�uiploycco are ciii��loy��c:, of lhc C��unr;il. I;y r�;;isou I�;�rr.i�(, it ���ill intil:c nu claini, �li�inand c�r r�����lic;.�fion lu ur (<',r �iny ric�hl or �',rivilc:yo a����lictil,li� lo a�t;� ulfic:;•r c�r r�npl<�; c,;� o.` I.h�:� Uotuicil, ini:]u�liirJ, i,uC iic�L liniilecl Lo, �vorl:�rian's cuni]x,nsalic�n c:O��ort����: tnu�m�,loy�nr:n[ in:;,.n'<incn l��;n�-:fil:;, s��itil securily cuverc�c�e ur reti.ir..menl mc�nl7cnsl�i�� or crcctil. • i l�i. Ma_;fr,r C��n�_ract. 'Chc City tuuicrs[on�ls I.h;�C thc program is sul�jecl to the fenns ancl con�iili��iirs uf the IVi�isler Cu:ilrt�c[ betw���:.n tlie Cour�c,il �ind 11UU [�nc] to 11UI7's curr�iit +in�:l fulurc ruJes r�nd I"nqUlations r�nd the CiCy agrces lo �il�icir by thi: samo ancl Co c�,oncr�ilc �.vilh th^ Gc,imc:il in ifs cni��nli�ncc thcrre;diCli. �ici i�ie!!'�I>i�!-, officcr nr cn;pluycc of Lho C<nmcil, iie +nember ol d�e qovc,'niny I,o;ly of. t!ic loc��lily {uif)' an�l cuunly) in �vhicl� Ll�c proj;_�::f i:; siLut�lou, .incl uo utncr pii}�lic of�icit�l oi such loeali.t��� or ioc�i]iLies who <:::erc:ises ariy fun�Cians or rr.s��onsibiliCies wri.ih resp�scC t:o Lhe pruject, iluriny his tem�re or (or one ycar thei'e�:CCr, shrill li��v�: ��ny inl<:rest, direct or indirecC, in this conlr��cl or iii any proceec'.s or benetits arising l6eret:o;��. IN `.Nl'1'NLSS V��1ll:RL'UI', lhr: parlies herelo hava c�>>isr:il U;i , aqrc:cn�enC tu he e.:r_cufed on Ihe clo}' ��nd �.�t;r firsC <il,u��c wrilfcn l�y tlioii <�uChori::ed re��r�;senla[ives. /�pproveci as to leqol Curm S acleq;.i�3cy -- . ._. . - --. . .------- — – --- �-- -------- -- ('r,rr„sl U. Pdo�vlin, ii., Sf�3(( Cuu��scl zuun � ... n,;r.•r,zoP�i.l•r��r:� cour;c;ti. ��v- ------------ - Gh�irmon C;T'Tl' Ol' L' 1�--- — ---_ -- ----. .-- ---- -- � � � �9 LISTING OF VACANT 40' LOTS IN THE CITY OP FRIDLEY* *Includes other Sub-standard size lots Location Lot size (combined size) Lots 14, 15, Block 4, Hyde Park 40' 80' Parcel 300, Part of Lot 15, Moore lake Highlands lst 40' Lots 16, 17, Biock 9, Hamiltons Addn. to Mechan. 40' Lot 16, Block 16, Hamiltons Addn. to Mechan. 40' Lot 28, Block 11, " " " 40' Lot 29, Block 11, " " ° 40' Lot 30, Block 11, " " " 39` Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 11 " ° " Cot 4, Block 11 " " " LotS 23, 24, Block 13 " " " Lot 30, Block 9, Plymouth Addition Lat 15, Block 3, Plymouth Addition Lot 11, Bloc!c 10, Ply�nouth Addition Lot 16, B7ock 11, Plymouth Addition Lot 30, Block 12, Plymouth Additian Lot 10, Block 13, Plymouth Addition Lots 1,2, Block 3, Shaefers Sub '�1 S /,- 'Lot 8, Block 4 Shaefers Sub �1 Lots 3,4, Block 6 Fridley Park Lots 37,38, Block 6, Fridley Park Lots 9,10, Block A, Riverview Heights Lots 20,2i, Block A Riverview Heights Lot 57, Block A, Rivervie�a Fleights tats 63,64,65, Block A, Riverviet•� Heights Lot 72, alock A " " 4G' 40' 40' 38' ao� 40' 40' 39' 40' 47' 42' 44' 45' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' ,: � 120' :� 94' $II' 90' 50' 50' 75' � � � Listing of vacant 40' Lots 5n the City of Fridley Page 2 Location Lot Size Lots 78 and 79, Block A, Riverview Heights Lots 80,81,82,83, Block A P,iverview Heights Lot 2b, Black C, Riverview Heights Lots 27,28,29,30, Block D, Riverview Heights tots 27,28, Block E, Riverview Neights Lots 59,60, Block E, Riverview Neights Lots 1,2,3, Block F, Riverview Heights Lots 4,5,6, Block F, Riverview Heights tot Z1, Block F, Riverview Heights 10' of Lot 6, All of 7 and 8, B1. H RVH. Lot 9, Block H, Riverview Heights Lots 17,18, Block H, Riverview HeigF�ts Lots 1, 2, Block I, Riverview Neights iots 3, 4, Block I, Riverview Heights Lots i9,20, Block J, Riverview Heights East 15' of Lot 29 and all of 30, J.RVH lots 31,32,_ Block J, Rivenview Heights Cots 48 and 44, Block J, Riverview Heights Lots 2,3,4, Block K, Riverview Heights tots 22, 23, 61ock K, Riverview Heights Lots 24, 25, Block K, Rivervie��� Heights Lots 10, 11, 12, Block L, Rivervietia Heights Lots 27,28, Block L, Riverview Heights Lots 1,2,3, Block hl, Riverview lieights Lots 13,14,15, Block M, Rivervieri Heights 25,26,27,28, l31ocY, I� ,Riverview Neights 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' (2) 30'�j� 25' 25' 25' 30`. 30.' 25' 30' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' & 45' 25' 30' 25' 25' 25' �2) 25� �1) 29� (2) 25' {1) 30' 25' �iV 6 (combined size) 50' 100' 1�0' 50' 50' 85' 75' 70' 50' 60' 50' 50' 40' 50' 70' 75' 60' 50' 75' 50' 79' IIO' 100' Listing of Vacant 40' Lots in the City of Fridley � Page 3 Location Lot Size Lots 29,30,31,32, Block M, P.iv2rview Heights 25' � � Lots 1,2,3,4,5, Block N, Riverview Heights (4) 25' &(1) 30' l:ot 6, Block N, Riverview Heights 25' 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,Block N, R.V.H Lots 8,9, Block 0, Riverview Heights Lots 15,16, Block b, Riverview Heights Lots 18, 19, Block P, Riverview Height� Lots 27,28, Q, Riverview Heights Lots 29,30, Block Q, Riverview Heights Lots 31,32, Block Q, Riverview Heights Lots 28,29, Block R, Riverview Neights Lot 29, Block S, Rivervie+v fleights Cot 30, Block S, Riverview Heights Lots 9,in,11,12, Block T, Riverview Heights Lots 23 and 24, Block T, Riverview Heights Lots 31,32,33, Block T, Riverview Heights Lots 45,46,47, 81ack f. Riverview Heights Lots 1,2, Block U, Rivervievi Heights Lots 3,4, Block U, Riverview Heights Lots 23,24 , f3lock U, Riverview Heights Lots 31,32, Block U, Riverview Heights Lots 37,38, Block V, Riverivew Heiyhts Lots 22, 23 Block td, Riverview Fleights Lots 32,33, Block t�l, Rivervietv Neights Lots 1},}2, g}ock X, Rivervie�,,� Heights Lots 19,20, 61ock X, Riverviet� Heights 25' 30' 30' & 36' 25' 25' 30' 30' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' &30' (2)30' & (1)�25' 25' 30' 25' 25' 25' 25' 30' 25' 30' 25' ry.3 V �. (combined size) 100' 130' 175' 60' 66' 50' .� .� .� 50` 100.' 55' 85' 75' 60' 50' 50' 50' 50' 60' 50' 6tl' 50' a� Listing of Vacant 40' Lots in City of Fridley Page 4 lot Size combination Lots 30, 31, 61ock X, Riverview Heights 30' 60' � Lots 12,13, Block Y, Riverview Heights 30' b0' Lot 10, Block AA, Riv°rview Neights 25' Lot ll, Block AA, Riverview Heights 25' Lots 13,14, Block BB, Riverview Heights 25' 50' Lots 27,28, Blocl 1,Springbrook Park 30' and 41' ��� Lots 1,2, Slock 4, Springbrook Park ��� 60' Lots 11,12, Block 4, Springbrook Park 30' 60' Lot 18, Block 4, �� �� 3p� 30' 60' Lots 24,25> Block 4, " �� 30, 60' Lots 29,30, Bock 4, " �� Lots 16,17, Block 5�- Spring8rook Park 30' 60' Lots 19,20,21, Block 5, Springbrook Park 30' 90' � Lots 22,23, Block 5, SpringBrook Park 30' 60' Lots 39,40, Block 5, SpringBrook Park 34� fi0' Lots 1,2,3,43 �leck•i, �pring b'rook Park (3} 30' &(1) 35' 125' Lots 42,43,44, Block 7, Spring Brook Park 30' 90` Lots 45,46,47,48, Block 7, Spring Brook Park (3) 30' &(1.} 33' 123' Pt 4, all of 5,6,7,$> Block 7, Spring Brook 30' 740' Lots 9,10,11, Block 7, Spring Brook Park 30' 90' Lots 26,27>28,29, 61ock 7, Spring Brook Park (3) 30' &(1) 40' 130' Lots 32,33, Block 10, Spring Brook Park 30' 60' Lots �3,3461ock 11, Spring Grook Fark 30' 60' lots 7,8, Block 12 , Sring Brook Park 30' 60' Lots 16,17, Block 12, Spring Brook Park 30' 60' Lots 18,19,20,21,22, Qlock 12 Spring Br. Pk 30' 150' �� . Lot 23 Block 12 Sprin9 Brook Parl: 30' Lot 24, Block 12 Spring arook Park 30' -...--.� - , � � �� Listings of Vacant 40' Lots in City of fridley tocation Lots 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33 Bl. 1Z Spr. Br. Park Lots 34;35, Block 12, Spring Brook Park Lots 47.42, Block 12, Spring Brook Park Lots�9,. 10,11, Block 13, Spring Brook Park Lots 12,13,14,15, Block 13, Spring Brook Park Lots 17,15, Block 13, SPring Brook Park Lots 19,20,21,22, Block 13, Spring Brook Park Lots 17;18, Block 14, Spring Brook Park Lots 23, 24, Block 14, Spring Brook Park TAX FORFEIT LOTS {SUBSTAN4ARD SIZE Lot 27, A,S. #23 Lot 8, 81ock 19, Fridley Park Lots 1, 2,3, Hamilton's Addn to Fridley Park Lot 11, Block 4, Hyde Park Lot 2i, Block 10, Hyde Park Lot 1, Block 1, Oake Grove Addition Lot 30, Block 4, Oak Grove Additio� Lot 15, Block 2, Plymouth Lot 30, Block 2, Plymouth Lot 30, Block 8, Plymouth Lot 30, Block 12, Plymouth Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6, Block A, Riverview Heights Cots 9,10, Block N, Rivervie��� Heights Lots 25,26, Block U, Rivervie�a Neights Lots 13,14,15,16, Block V, Riverview Heights Lots 26,27,28,29, Block 1�1, Riverview Heiyh*s Lots 16,17, Block Y, Rivervieti•r Neights Page 5 Lot size 30' 30' 30.' 30' 30' 30' 30' 30' 30' 42' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 1 40' 35' � 39' 25' 25' 30' 25' 25' 25' �•, r� combination 240' 60' 60' 90' 120' 60' 120' 60' .� i20' 150' 50' 60' 100' lOQ' 50' � � Tax Forfeit Substandard sized lots Page 6 Locaiion Lot Size Lot 3, Block Z, Riverview Heights 31� Lots 4, Block Z, Riverview Heights 30'( Lot 5, Block Z, Riverview Eleight�:• � Lot 1, Block AA, Riverview Heights 3�� Lots 20,21, Black AA, Riverview Heights Z5' Lots 15 - 25, Block BB Rivervietia Hei9hts71 lots 25' Lots 18, 19, Block AA, " " 25� Lots 8,9, 61ock AA, Riverview Heights 25� Lots 13,14, Block 4, Spring Brook Park 30' �ot 27, Block 4, Spring Brook Park 42� Lot 28, Block 4, Spring Brook Park 44� Lots 4,5, Block 6, Spring Brook Park 30' Lots 21,22, Block 14, Spring Brook Park 30' Explanation: + iax Fvrfeit lots have been grouped together tivhere 2 or more Lots combined would make a buildable site. In the regular listing, lots have been combined by �ownership. �� Combined 92' 50' 275' � 50' 60' .� .� �1�) 4 ��