Loading...
PL 04/06/1977 - 30465CITY OF FRIDLEY � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 6, 1977 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Harris called meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Harris, Bergma.n, Schnabel, .Shea, Langenfeld Members Absent: Peterson Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: �IARCH 23, 1977 ��Irs. Schnabel requested that page 9, second paragraph at the bottom be amended to read as follows: The sentence that starts "Mrs. Schnabel said perhaps what Mr. Coddon was saying was at the time he made the statement before the Council..." � should be changed to reflect that although he did not own the building at the time, he perhaps failed to say that he would own it in the future. P�IOTION by Shea, seconded by Schnabel to approve the Planning Commission minutes. Upon a voice vot� a7,1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. PUBLIC HEAR.ING: :?EZONING REQUEST, ZOA ��77-01, SY GARY PETERSQN: Re- zone Lots 3 and 4, and Lots 22 and 23, all in Block 2, Meadowmoor Terrace, from C-1 (local business areas) to R-2 (two-family dwelling areas), the same being 1326 and 1344 Osborne Road NE and 1331 and 1345 Meadowmoor Drive NE. MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Shea to open the Public Hearing on rezoning request, ZOA �f77-01, by Gary Peterson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Public Hearing d'pen at 7:40 p.m. Mra ���y �eterson9 the petitioner, was not present. Mr. Boardman explained the proposal to the Planning Commission stating that the petitioner is requesting to build 4 duplaxes, 2 facing Meadocamoor and 2 facing Osborne. Chairperson Harris asked if the petitioner was in the audience. The petitioner was not in the audience. The Chairperson aslced if there was anyone in the �, sudience against this petition. Bernard K. Iieille, 1418 Meadocamoor Drive, presented a petition to the Planning Cominission. He said that this land is zoned commercial and was unaware that it was anything but residential. He said that he wanted to see it stay resi- dential. Planning Commission Meeting - April 6, 1977 Page 2 Chairperson Harxis asked if he understood that is was not now zoned co�nercial. Alr. Hei11e stated he knew, but felt, it should be single family homes. Schnabel asked if those in the audience were opposed to R-2 and would like it ^ to remain commercial. Y-Ir. Heille stated that he would like to see it zoned R-1 which everybody was led to believe existed in the first place. Bergman asked Mr. Boardman to read what was not allowed in C-1 zoning district. Iir. Boardman read the C-1 zoning code. :�ir. Bergman stated that he wanted the audience to be aWrare that the property owner has the right to build any of the allowed uses on these lots. Nancy Melbie, 1346 Meadowmoor Drive, said she, lives directly across the street and she is very much opposed to the proposal. She wasn't told that it was commercial property and felt it was the responsibility of the City to inform her as such. Walt Lizakowski, 1402 Meadowmoor Drive said tha.t he had moved in 5 years ago and was told by the City tha.t the whole area was R-1 single family dwelling. Rolla Morin, 7635 Meadowmoor Drive, said she was told last year by the City that they were single family homes. If they would have known anything other than R-1 they would not have purchased their home. Nancy Melbie also stated that there were lots of kids in this area and dupleaces would provide additiona.l kius in the neighborhood. �Iilliam Sharp, 1377 Meadowmoor Drive, said that the idea of building a busines� in the middle of a residential block is beyond his understanding. Donna Czupta, 7620 Bacon Drive, said we live about a block away and if businesses go in on Meadowmoor it will affect my children, but I'am also opposed to duplexes. If you put in 2 duplexes on rieadowmoor Drive that wi11 mean 4 additional families which will mean added children. I don`t think we can handle the population. It would seem to me that the population should be spread out a little more in- stead of cramming it into a two-block area. I would invite you to drive down our block and see that there are a lot of children, and we don`t need the added children,we are content with what we have. She said also, we don't need the added traffic that this proposal would generate. Cha.irma.n Harris read the petition. The petition reads, "We the undersigned, request that Lots 3 and 4 and iots 22 and 24, Block 2, Meadowmoor Terrace, address 1326, 1344 Osborne and 1337 and 1345 Meadowmoor zoned C-1 local business, remain zoned C-1 or changed to R-1 single family dwelling and not rezoned to R-2 multiple family d�aelling; a duplex or a double bungalow. Larry Von Mosch, 1392 Meadowmoor Drive� asked the co�nission what was involved in rezoning this property to R-1. Can't the land owners around, petition to have it changed? Chairperson Harris explained that the City or the property owner could petition for rezoning however, it is the policy of the City to receive only a petition from the property o�+mer in order to rezone the property. Richard Morin, 7635 Meadowmoor Drive, stated that the way it stands is that ^ they either get R-2 or C-1, and unless they can petition the owner of the lar.. to change his request to R-1 they will either end up with a duplex or a parking lot of some com�ercial property along Osborne. Planning Conunission Meeting - Anril 6, 1977 Pa�e 3 Councilman Schneider asked if staff had tried to get Mx. Peterson to build . single family homes. Iir. Boardman stated tha.t he was not.sure whether Mr. � Peterson was approached with this idea. Councilman Schneider stated that _ he thought maybe a compromise of R-2 along Osborne Road and R-1 along Meadowmoor Drive could �taybe be arranged. Rolla Morin stated she was concerned tha.t the lots not go commercial on Meadowmoor Drive. r'►.rs. Schnabel said that she looked at the area and felt the worst thing that could ha.ppen was tha.t cammercial be build on Meadowmoor. P'(x. Langenfeld said that he would like to point out to the audience that members of this Commission are also concerned citizens;as they are. It is our duty to review the actual request and review the audience to see if the request was in order. He said that there was no way that we could enter into R-1 zoning without the request of the property owner, and tha.t the Commission could either suggest that the audience discuss a change with the property owner, or the Planning Commission take action on the problem as presented that night. William Sharp asked if all 4 commercial lots could be joined together and a large commercial building be built. Cha.irma.n Harris said that this could happen. Langenfeld said that he would like to point out to the Planning Commission that there ha.d been several people who had stated that they had received false information from City staff and highly suggest that whoever gives out ,,,,� this information know exactly what they are referring to. 11so, he pointed '' out to the audience that sometimes the Commission members look at the lesser of two evils. r3chard Morin said that if it stands that they get either duplex or commercial he would rather see the duplex. ATr. Bergman read the petition and questioned whether the people who signed the petition realized that they signed either for or against comm.ercial. There were several people in the audience that stated that they were not aware that this F�as what they s3gned. Chairman Ha.rris suggested that the petitions will be placed on the front desk and that anybody wishing to remove their name from the petition, be allowed to do so when the discussion on this item was completed. Bernard Heille said that he felt there had been a terrific loss between this area and the City f rom the day of it's conception and it has proven right down the line the lack or willingness of the City to respond to the needs of the people in Meadowmoor. He said he felt like the people in the area lack City services, lack response from the City, lack police services. �Ie can't keep gas in his car and f eels that it shoul.d be more responsive. LeAnn Hennes, 7600 Arthur Street, said that she called c3ty hall when there was a street light broken and the broken glass was not even swept up. She said that the City ha.d just forgotten about them. � �. Plannin� Commission Meetin� - April 6, 1977 Page 4 Walt Lizakowski, 1402 Mea.dowmoor Drive, said he felt the seryices had been �, real la�c. Iie has had to call in for snow removal every year for 5 years ^ and when they come through, they come through the-middle and leave one side unplowed or they will come through so late that a foot of snow is packed � down. La.st year they called about sweeping and they swept it once all year and now there is glass on the street and has been for the last 2 weeks, and they won't sEaeep it. �ir. Langenfeld said tha.t he would like to indicate here that he was glad to hear these comments because this was the place to begin them and they would defin�tely reach the top from here. He said he would also like to make a comment to the audience that they could suggest that this could be zoned to R-Z and reduce it from a co�nercial nature, and then suggest to the audience that they talk to Peterson before it goes to the Council and • maybe suggest to hi_m that it should be R-l. Chairman Harris said that he would feel remiss if we acted on this before having a chance to talk to the petitioner. Ms. Czupta asked if there is a possibility in this rezoning that the 2 lots on Osborne remain zoned C-1 and that the 2 lots on Meadowmoor be rezoned to the R-2. Chairperson Harris said that this could be done because it was a lesser re- quest than what the petitioner had requested. She stated that it was her concern not only with the zoning, but the amount of people already in the area and felt that this suggestion would make everybody happy by cutting down on the population and would allow the developer to gain part of the request that he wanted.. She said that she was the one that made up the peti- � tion and the reason it reads that way was that she was trying to ma.ke this ' point with as little words as possible. . Chairma.n Harris asked if the 2 parcels on Osborne would meet the requirement of C-1 zoning. Mr. Boardma.n said that these lots would meet that requirement. Mr. Bergman said that he would like to encourage the people in the audience to contact Mr. Peterson and discuss with him thoughts on the rezoning of. this property. P.ichard Morin said that he would like to re-emphasize one point, that they all feel that they were deceived as far as what the properties were zoned as, and he wanted to get that in the record one more time,that they called on it before they bought their property and �aere told that it was zoned residential as were a number of people, and he would like the Planning Co�ission to reassure them again that it wi11 be looked into because it is not some casual mistake that a clerk ma.de. It affects them severely. Chairman Harris wanted to give a piece of advice to the people in the audience that felt they were misled, in fact, they may not have been purposely mis- led by somebody on the staff. He advised that in the future if they are going to make a purchase of a property or a house that theq don't leave any- thing to chance, and come into the City office and look at the zoning map hanging on the wall. ^ Planning Commission Meetin� - April 6, 1977 Page 5 � Ber�nan said that he would 1ik� by a show of hands, wizich people in the audience through direct contact, felt they had been directly inislead or misinformed as to the zoning. Mr. Eergonan stated that for the records he would like to indicate that nine persons indicated tha.t they were misled as to the zoning. MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Schnabel, the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing on rezoning request, ZOA ��77-01, by Gary Peterson. Upon a voice vo�e, all voting aye, Cha.irman Ha.rris declared the Public Hea.ring closed at 8:45 p.m. MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission continue until April 20, Public Hearing: rezoning request, ZOA ��77-01, by Gary Peterson: P.ezone Lots 3 and 4, and Lots 22 and 23, a11 in Block 2, Meadowmoor Terrace, from C-1 (l�ocal business areas) to R-2 (two-family d��elling areas), the same being 1326 and 1344 Osborne Road NE and 1331 and 1345 Meadowmoor Drive NE for the reason that in all fairness to the people,. the petitioners should be at the meeting and allow the people to discuss ' this item with the petitioner. Lpon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Langenfeld would like to add that the audience had shown concern about City services in this area and would like the City to step in to resolve some of the problems such as broken glass, sLealing of gas and proper police.gatrol. �..� MOTION by Bergma.n, seconded by�Shea, to open the Public Hearing for a Special Use Permit, SP ��77-01, Certified r4obile Homes, Incorporated. Upon a voice � vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Lrnie Pasborg and Mr. :laxwell of Certified Mobile flomes were present. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REOUEST FOR A SPECIAT, USE PERMIT, SP �f77-01, CERTIFIED MOBILE HOMES, INCORPORATID: Per Fridley City Code, Section 205.102, 3, Pi, to allow the continuation of a mobile home sales lot to replace SP �71-14 which will e�ire on Apri1 17, 1977, located on the Westerly 600 feet of the Southerly 320 feet of the Atortherl� 750 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 12, the sam.e being 7625 V�.ron Road NE. Mr. Boardman explained to the Commission that this special use permit was granted for a period of 5 years and e�ires in April and because of the condition placed on special use permits at the time it was issued the requirement was for the issua.nce of a new special use permit. Mr. �oardman explained the 19 stipulations on the old special use permit and would like to indicate certain changes that were allowed by the City Council when the present owners took over the property in 1974. Item 4�11 was changed to a11ow for a minimum of 6' distance between units and 50 units in the-display area. Also, Items ��14 and �15 were removed. Shea asked the petitioner how may units they had on the property. Mr. Pasborg said that he thought somewhere around 50. :ir. Pasborg stated that the amount of room that they had on the property if properly distributed, would hold �'^1 around 100. Mr. Langenfeld asked Mr. Boardman if the staff has had any problems with the stipulations to date. I�r. Boardm.a.n stated that in general, all of the stipu- lations as listed have been met. Plannin�Commission Meeting - April 6, 1977 Page 6 I�Irs. Schnabel said that in vi,ewing the pxopertg before the lneeting, it ^ seemed that there were other stipulations that ha.d noC been-met. Item 9i9 which states that the office will be skirted had not been met. �Ir. Pasborg said tha.t they had just taken the skirting off because th.ey wanted to put additional siding on the mobile home that will extend all the wa.y to the ground to give the appearance of a permanent structure. 2irs. Schnabel said the other item was .��14 staCing that there would be woodwalks to all units. Mr. Pasborg stated that Item �I14 changed because the whole area was black- topped. Mr. Boardman stated that Item �14 and �15 were waived by the City Council in 1974. Schnabel asked about Item �7 discussing easement for roadwa.y to Osborne .behind Frostop Drive-In. Mr. Boardman stated that no easement ha.d ever been received and would quest�on the necessity of the easement for this development. Mr. Pasborg stated that presently, they do bring units across that property, but this is with mutual consent of the property owner. He also stated tha.t he ha.d seen the plan showing a road with a cul-de-sac coming across that area and stopping at their property, but to his knowledge, was never platted. Mrs. Schnabel asked if for any reason they were not allowed to bring mobile homes across this property, d o they have room to bri,ng it in on their own property? Mr. Pasborg stated that they di.d. :Ir. Pasborg stated that they wanted $60,000 ior permanent access across the back property and that they couldn't justify that on a 3-year special use permit. AZrs. Schnabel was concerned about encroachment on Strite-Anderson property. ^ Mr. Pasborg stated that if that was the case, it would be remitted. i�rs. Schnabel explained that when a motion is made she would like to bring out three points and one� was that they added siding to extend to the blacktop, two, «as that the units in the display area be 6' apart and the units in the Lst�orage area be 1' apart and three, that a security fence be provided on the south side of the property as stipulated in Item ��15. Mx. Boardman reitterated that Item 4�15 had been waived under the condition that they received a letter from Strite-Anderson regarding it. The letter was received from Strite-�i�.derson and the item was then waived. :10TION by Bergman, seconded by Shea, to close the Public Hearing for a Special Use Permit, SP �,�77-01, Certified Mobile Homes, Incorporated. LTpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the public hearing closed at 9:10 p.m. TIOTION by Bergman, seconded by Shea, that Planning Comanission reconnnend approval of the request for a Special Use Permit, SP ��77-01, Certi.fied Mobile Homes, Incorporated: Per Fridley City Code, Section 205.102, 3, N, to allo�v the contin- uation of a mobile home sales lot to replace SP �71-14 which will expire on April 17, 1977, located on the Westerly 600 feet of the Southerly 320 feet of the Northerly 750 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 12, the same being 7625 Viron Road NE, with the fol.lowing stipulations: 1. T.�'ront setback be changed from 15 feet to 20 feet. � 2. Pre-stressed anchored concrete curbing around all blacktop areas. � 3. Crushed rock parking area for trailers be oiled. � ^ ^ Planning Commission Meeting - April 6, 1977 Page 7 4. All landscaped areas to be sodded. (This includes the two 20' x 75' str3ps along the service road). 5. Special Use Permit granted for a period o� 3 years at which time it will be reviewed. 6. Ldhen perma.nent facilities are built, the owner is to provide an easement for roadway to Osborne Road behind the Frostop Dxiye-In. 7. The area outlined on the plot plan is to �,e blacktopped. (Parking lot) 8. The office is to be at least 24' x 48` on concrete blocks and to be skirted to give the appearance of a permanent structure. 9. The landscaping is to.be done according to the landscaping plan and blacktopped and curbed. 10. Units in the display area are to be minimum of 6' apart �aith a maximum of 50 units. 11. The parking lot to be striped for customers and employee parking. 12. There shall be not less than four security lights around the perimeter. 13. All vacant property to be graded and seeded. (The City En�ineer states tha.t this was agreed to with the previous owner and he f eels that agree- ment would still cover it.) 14. The sign is to conform to City Ordinances without a variance, and to be the proper distance back from the service road. 15. The office will be taxed as a permanent structure. Upon open voice vote, all voted aye and the motion carried. 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. i`77-�3, THOPIAS BRICKNER: Split off the West 5' of Lot 24, Block 2, Harris Lake Estates (1671 Camelot Lane NE) and add it to Lot 23, Block 2, Harris Lake Estates, (1661 Camelot Lane NE) so the property o�aners of Lot 23 can install a swimming pool in their back yard. Mr. Boardma.n e�cplained that Thomas Brickner wanted to sell off a 5' portion of his lot to the adjacent property owner to allow for the development of a swimming pool on his neighbors property. 2�r. Brickner's lot is presently undeveloped and this lot split will not affect the code requirements for his lot. MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Bergman to recommend to Council the approval of Lot Split L.S. ��77-03, Thomas Bri.ckner to split o�f the [dest 5` o� Lot 24, Block 2, Harris Lake Estates (1671 Camelot Lane NE) and add it to Lot 23, Block 2, ilarris Lake Estates, (1661 Camelot Lane NE) so the property' owners of Lot 23 can install a swi�aing ponl in their back yard. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Plannin� CoRnmission Meeting - Apri1 6, 1977 � Page 8 4. xLOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. ��77-02, PARK METROPOLITAN INVESTMENT, INC.: � Continued until April 20, 1977 S. �CONTINUED: STUDY OF INTERSECTION AT 53RD AND CENTRAL Ntr. Mortenson was present. Mr. :-iortenson said he discussed the plans with Menards and they both agreed to the improvement shown as Plan B. Mr. T�qortenson requested however, tha.t the road be designed so that the transformer pole be included in one of the land- scape areas. Mr. Boardman stated that he could see no problem with that. Mr. Mortenson asked �ahat the approximate cost would he. Mr. Boardman thought that it would be around $10,000.- $12,000. 1'�r. Mortenson said that he would check with Menards as to how they want to pay for this and �,rill have some decision back for the Council on April 18,-1977. MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission re- commend to the City Council that the street improvement as agreed to by Mr. Mortenson (Plan B) be approved for construction. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, the motion carried. MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Langenfeld to suspend the rules to allow Councilwoma.n Kukowski to address the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried. ^. Councilwoman Rukowski wanted to discuss the issue of absenteeism that has been pointed out several tim.es in the minutes and has been quite obvious on the Planning Commission. She said that she realized that everyone is a volunteer and tries hard to attend the meetings, however, the vice-chair of ten is not in attendance when the chairperson is absent. She wondered if some encouragement should be sent down from the Planning Connnission when attendance becomes a problem. She said that her concern is that with one member absent, that the Planning Commission is not getting accurate information from all your commis- sions & therefore, how can the Council feel that you are passing something accurate on to us. She said tha.t she really feels that if you are appointed to do the job by the commission, you should do the job. Mr. Langenfeld said that sometimes we have to update any missing members as to what happened at past meetings and therefore, waste additional time. Mr. Bergman said that the atmosphere that comes down from the Council kind of negates any action that could be taken by the chairperson. The Council is reluctant to remove anyone without first getting a letter of resignation. . Councilwoman Kukowski thought that maybe some policy should be developed by the Planning Com�nission for Council approval, in dealing with this problem. She said that she doesn't f eel that the Council should pass down reco�nenda- tions to the Planning Commission, and because you`re working with the situatio�p.� you should let us know and give us a couple of alternates. �� ��.� Planning Commission Meeting - April 6, 1977 Page 9 /`� TZr. Bergman asked the other members if they have had any of the same problems that the Community Development Commission has been having. Shea stated that her cot�nission has not had any problem with absenteeism. Langenfeld said that they have had some bad times when attendance was down. Schnabel stated that she also has had some attendance problem with the Appeals Commission. She said also, that if the Council sees that there is a problem, it should be the responsibility of the Council to do some policing in this area. Councilwoman Kukowski felt that the policy should come from the Planning Commission. Schnabel said that she felt si�ce the �ouncil set the directit�es for the op- eration of the commissions, it should be upon the Council to be included in the commission ordinance. , Councilcaoman Kukowski just wanted to bring this item up and would appreciate any further input back from you on this item. 6. �CONTINUED• RECOP�R�'IENDED CHANGES IN CHAPTER 212, i�INING,FRIDLEY CITY CODE Mr. Boardman reiterated the changes that were suggested by the Planning Comm.is- �� sion at their last meeting at which ti.me theg had recomanended a public hearing process be established to allo�v for the mining operation. Mr. Boardman asked if the Planning Co�onission wants staff to ma.ke the changes and send these on to Council. Mr. Langenfeld would like to have the final draft back to the Envirorunental Commission on the 19th of April and back to the Planning Commission on the 20th for final approval before going to the City Council. MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Shea, to continue reconmended changes in Chapter 212, Mining,Fridley City Code until April 20, 1977. Upon voice vote, all voting aye, motion carried. 7. *CONTINLTID: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE CODE Schnabel wanted the Planning Conramission to receive an article from the Minne- apolis Star dated March 22, 1977, and wanted to make sure tha.t when the commis- sion develop this ordinance that they don't put any unnecessary burden on the City staff by ma.king their review a subject for a lawsuit. A10TION by Langenfeld, seconded by Schnabel to receive an article from the Minneapolis Star dated March 22, 1977 (attachment to the minutes). Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. � There was some discussion as to how the maintenance code should be reviewed. Pl�nni�g Comtnission Meeting - Apri1 6,�1977 Page 10 Shea requested that we set up a separate meeting to handle this item. ^ Mr. Langenfeld asked Mr. Boardman if the document they had before them was the final staff recommendation. Mr. Boardman said that it was the revised document that was suggested by the Planning Commission. MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Shea, to set up a special meeting on April 18, 1977. Upon voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanim.ously. 8. �CONTINUID: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: ACCESS iir. Boardman explained the goals and object3ves of the goal area access. MOTION by Bergma.n, seconded by Schnabel, to approve goal and objectives A100 through A190. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 9. �CONTINUED: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: COMMUNITY VITALITY *Check previous agendas for background material Mx. Boardman explained goal area Community Vitality. Mr. Boardman stated that he set up two goals under this goal area. One � would deal with the economic well-being of the community and the other on effective goverrnnent operations. He then explained goals and objectives under each area. � Mr. Langenfeld suggested that the wording in V110 be changed to read more smoothly by eliminating "the kind of m� of". ��IOTION by Bergman, seconded by Shea, to approve V100 through V240. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Schnabel asked how we are addressing the community response of our business coimnunity. She thought that we should have some statement which would include the business community. A:r. Boardman felt that this could be included. MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Bergman, that an amendment be added to the original motion that a program objective V150 be added, which deals directly toward the City's objective towards the business co�nunity. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the amended motion carried. MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Schnabel, that staff reword al.l areas of the goals and objectives where there is implied business to specifically indicate business. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. ^ Shea said that she wanted to bring up one other thing. She said that she "� finally found the Human Resources fund. The City sent her a program budget in which there are two funds. One is a Community Development fund. Out of �- Planning Com�aission Meeting - April 6, 1977 Pa e 11 f� this fund we gave $1,000 to North Suburban Family Seryices, SACA got $500, Red Cross got $160 for the "Baby" and the County Winterization Program got $750. The other fund is in Parks and Recreation from which, Fine Arts was given $1,000 and $2,000 was given to the Senior Citizens. MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Schnabel, to receive the information from Canadian Financial Corporation on their Golden Valley Dover Hills Project. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the information was received. Schnabel said that she really recommended that the members go to see the pro- ject before the meeting on the 20th. �+.DJOURNMENT; MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded�by Shea, tha.t the meeting be adjourned. L'pon voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Ha.rris declared the Planning Commission Meeting of April 6, 1977 adjourned at 11:35 p.m. ' sp ctfully submitted, .���� ,�v���°n/' � J r old Boardman, � � Planner � ��1