The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 12/06/1978 - 6645City of Fridley AGEN6A PLaNNING C6MMISSION MEETING WERNESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1978 CaLL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: NOVEMBER 22, 1978 1. 2. 3 � 5 LFC HEARIi4G: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED PRELIMINARY WORMSBECKER: Being a replat of all of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, T-30, R-28, Anoka County, Minnesota; except the South 877.87 feet thereof, 7ying Westerly of State Truck Highway No. 47. Subject to easement for utility purposes over the North 20 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, lying Westerly of present State Trunk Highway No. 47 except Easterly 115 feet therof, and the West 20 feet of the Easterly 115 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, lyin9 Westerly and adjacent to West 7ine of State Trunk Highway Nn. 47, gener•ally located at 83rd and University Avenues N.E. ON Of a REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL YtIKULtUf`'I StKVict:rer 5ection zu5.iui, s, u, ot the t�rtdley Code, to a71ow sales and service for the installation of service station equipment on Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 13, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, the same being 5333 University Avenue N.E. CORPORATION: Split off the South half of Lot 6, and add it to Lot 7, all in Block 11, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, for the purpose of movin9 a double bungalow on the combined area, located just south of 5430 5th Street N.E. CONTINUED: MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CONSULTANT PROPOSALS FOR DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATIQN MTDWEST PLANNING AND RESEARCH, INC. DEUELOPMENT CONCEPT CORPORATION LEON MADSEN PROFESSIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 7:30 P.M. PAGES 1 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 22 23 - 25 SEPARATE �� Planning Commission Agenda December 6, 1978 Page 2 6. RECEIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISS PINK 7_ RECEIVE ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MINUTES: NOUEMBER 15, 1978 WHITE 8.. _RECETVE APPEALS C�MMISSION MINUTES: SPECIAL MEETING, NOVEMBER YELLOW 9. 07HER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: i � CITY OF FRIDLEY CAI.L TO ORDER: Ghairman Barris cslled the November 22� 1978s P�i� COO�ss�on meatin8 to order at 7:3o P.M. ROLL CALL: ' Members Present: I.eRoY �quiBts Robert Peterson, Richard Harris, Virginia Schnabel� Jim I,sngeafeld� Ned Storla (1�4. Storla arrived at 7:� P.M.) Members Absent: Others Presenb: None Hone 1. /�PROV2�i YLAlYlV11Yl� I.vPIDUaviv.. . '----- - M(lTION by Mr. IanBenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to app�e �e October 2j, 19'7$ Plannin8 Co�nisaion Minutes as written. , UPOI+T A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTIIVG AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TEE Md1'ION CARRIID (JNpIdIM0U5LY. 2. [�s�rur�%r+ {�ira�i�ti CrVMCLL�JiW� �i+:va+u+ . ��_ _ _ — MOTSON by Ms. Schnabel, seconded by N¢�. Petersaa� Appeals Co�ission 6Pecial Mee%ing Minutes. to receive the Oetober 2�+i 1978 Ms. Schnabel stated that regatding Item 1 on the Pirat page of the minutea, what they mean by that ia that they, as a Co�ission, prefer the format usedi3n�t�o revie� T1�e prcllnauce� rsther than the Yormet used in the docwnent thRyi �B ��e section and Teason they preferred the old format was that everything u.� � 3rive- everything R-2 v8a in one section, etc.� wherees in the nev format, they p .,re�ys, ete� together� snd the C�isaioners felt it would be too eaey to mig8 e�thing pertaining to a�ciYic building erea• �, Oquist stated that the wsy the new ordinance �aas atructured, it would need a table of contents and aa i�ex in eTder to Yind thin8s• 1de. SchnaDel stated t}ast the o1d forasat woul�i be easier ier the P�1.i�o� �c� � cgiuid give them the section pertaining to their area� a�d evesything in that sectian. Mr, Oquiat suggested thet the chan8es and diecussions Prom all the co�nissions be co�piled into one doc�ent to avoid duplicationa and to make it easier for the Plannin6 Cp�tission when they diacuss the recommended changes from the Commissions. If the �� p�� p�is ipn,esnd since moattoY he C�o�iasionsovere uaing£thenasme process for revieving the d�umeat, it wauld not be that difficult to coz�olidate the changea. PLANNING COtR�ffSSION ME�'TINCil NWF�IIiER 22, 1978 PAGE 2 Mr. Peterson stated that since the Cu�ieaiona srere spending eo much time � the changee� he z.^ould like to see their discusaiona and reca�eendatioae a�xi sug�eeted a cut and paste proceas to consolidate the recoumiended changes, and did not xant the wer-le�y ed2�arialized because he did not want to l4se srpr part oY it. Mr. Oquist etated it vauld be too much for each Plsnning Caa�issiomer to have e set af each Co�isaion's minutee in Yroat of them when diecussing the changea. Ms. Schnabel agreed, but streased the importance of not having the minutes editorieliaed, Mr. I,angenfeld stated that his Ca�ission did not go through the document page by pege, but his Co�fission was concerned about the noise ox+dinance� the over-].Ry end iaterim items, and ended up deciding not to reco�end approval of the nev ordinance as ie, Without changes. � Ms. Schnabel atated that there vere instances vhert the Appeels Cammiesioaers did not feel that the new ordinance wa� in cc�pliance with existing ordinances� for instance� the Mainteaance Code has different definitions than the Zoning Ordinance, sad the Appeals Conwiseion felt those shou.2d be consisteut. Mr. Harris etated that each chsirmsn aee to it that their minutes, after the cut and pastfng process� vere un-edited uhen the Planning Commisaion discussed the proposed changes, and he would talk to stsfY about having the minutea consolidated and har they vould like to have it done. UPON A VOIOE VOTE� ALL VOTIP� AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TF� M02'ION CARRZID UNANIMOUSLY. 3. RECEIVE TI� APPEALS CO2+AffSSION SPECIAL ME�TING MTN[tTES: NOVF�ER 1, 1978: MOTION by Me. Sclznabel, seconded by Mr. Lnng�Yeld to receive the Nwember 1, 1978, Appeals Ca�iasion S�ecia2 Meeting M3nutes. Ma. Schnabel etated that regarding Item 1� on page 1, at the Oetober 2k, 1978 meeting oY the Appeals Camiission, they discuseed the definitions oF "Famiily" and "Occupancy Limit" a� there vas a motion by the Appeals Coffinission to bring to the Planning Coa�ission a deYinition of "Fami2y" and "Occupaacy I.imit" for their conaideration and that a legal opinion be given on both definiti0ns. Ms. Schnabel stated that the Minneeots WelYare Department uses three difinitions of Fsmily and read them ae follows: 1) A group of people who bqy, prepsre and eat their foa] in co�on. (Food Stamp Program). 2) A child liv3ng srith an eligible relative related bloodlines, marria�e; includes parents, cousins, aunts and unc2es, "great"-re2atives, etc. {AFDC}, 3) �tro or more individuals related by bloodlines, marriage or adoptiaa, sharing a housing unit main- tained by at least one of them.(Genersl Aseistance). Ms. Schnabel stated that those are deYinitions of "Family" a� in the Zoning Ordinance they attempt to define "Family". In terms of "Occupancy Limit", Hud's dePinition xsa "Tatal persone�bedroa��housing unit� qnd is 2�bedroom. Ms. Schnabel stated the Appeals Co�ission decided that the deYinition £or "Occupancy Limit° iu the Zoning Code should be "2 pereons per bedroom per dvelling unit". The Appeals Ccam�ission Would like eome kind oY legal interpretation of the defin3tiona. PLANriI1� COPR�QSSION MEEpINC, NOVE6ffiER 22, 1978 p/�g 3 Mr. Peterec,n stated that accoxding to that definition, the fami.],y in a three bedroom house vith a mother a� father snd iive childrea Would be in violatiars oY the ardinance. �+ ti+ould they handle that situatioa? Ma, SchnaDel etatcd that the problem arose thrpugh the tefinition oY "Oecupaacy Limit". There are sam�e housea in Fridley vhich contain large numbers oP people xho are unre].ated to each other aud at least one of these has caused a lot of problems for the City, becauae oY the complaints about this house. Ae an attempt to get same kind of definition that would give the City some legal baeia vith which to bendle this kind of problem, the Appeals Ca�mmisaion wauted s definition oY "Occupancy 7.imit" vhi,ch, z,rou�,d give the City legal recourse in this type of situatim. Mr. Peteraon etated that he did not like the idea of "Occupancy Limit" because there are sitvations vhere people have a three or fout bedro�n houae vith enough children and the mother and fsther to put them ov¢r the legal limit� a� did not like to put so�ething in the ordinaace that would cause s problem for them. Ms. Schnabel stated that ahe understood that the situation vas that if there were ao co�plaints about them, there vould be no prob3sm. Mr. Oqvist stated that the sitvation could arise vhere a neighbor vrauldn�t like the family and there you have a compleint� it could cause all kinds of problems with an ordinance like thia. Mr. Peterson stated that he thought Minneapolis had a non-related ordinance that has been effective, because besically in that situatfon� you are running a boarding house. A five bedroo� houae vith 10 unrelated people is basica2ly a board�ng hpuse, Mr. Harris suggested tbst they ge; a copy oP Minnespolis�s ordiasnce and revie�r it. Mr. Harris also stated that there wss q Nu�ssnce O�in�nae Whi.ch should cover a situation like that, that the Zoning Ordinance should not be considered a cure-all. Ms. Schnabel stated that the first inclination of tbe Appeals Commiaeion was to throw-out the dif�mition oY "Family" and not even get into "Occupancy Limit"� but tbe Maiatenance Code has a dePinition oP "Family"in it vhich reads: A group of not more than 5 Peraons, who need not be related by blood, marriage or adoption living together as a aingle housekeeping unit.° Hr. Peterson stated tbat sinCe it was already in the Maiateaance Code, they ahould not have to bave a deYinition in the Zoning Code. Ms.Schnabel stated thst mqybe when the Planning Co�ission discuesed this, they would decide to thrrna it out, which was the Appeals Coa�iseiona� first inclination� but as they telked about it, they sreren't sure if there �rere other reasone the dafinitioa �ras aeeded. Mr. Aarris ataied that he had talked with the City Attorney, end tLe City Attorney would receive cOpies of their diacussima regarding the proposed changea, and he cou2d interject, during their deliberatioas, hie legal opinions regax�ding the changes. 1Ar. Harrie stated he vouid like to think about 1t and discuse it at s later time, unlees they had a gpeciYic propossl. Me. Sehnabel atated thet the proposal vas to have a legal opinian on the definitioae _of "Femi�y" and "Occupancy Limit", end vould like to know if it rrould be enforceable. Ms. Schnabel stated she vould get the hSinneepolis ordinance regarding Boai+dinghouses and they could discuss it et the Planning Coo�iasion meeting. UPON A VOICE VOR'E, pLL VOTINC; p]'Ei CApIgMAN FlqggIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIID UNANIMOUSLY. PtpxxiNa co�ssrox r��zNC, xov�� 22, 1975 racE b b. RECENE APPEALS COI+A�IISSION MINUPES: NOVEMBER 14, 19q'8: MDTION by Me. Sehnabel, seconded by Mr Oquiat, to receive the Appeale Co�iseion I _ M�nutes of November 1k; Iq`��---- � _° , _ _ __ _ _ _ _ Mr. Peterson etated that regarding Mr. Hnxce Nedegaard's request to build on a 40 Yoot lot� he felt that by granting it they wou2d be opening themselvea up to s lot of other situations such as iP a person had a non-conYorming use on a piece oY prceperty a� it burned down� he could CCme back and sqy that the preeedeat ras that they sllowed it to be built beck to its original statua. Ms. Schnabel stated thet ehe had questioned the same thing and also hed mentioned the �de Psrk area. Ms. Schnabel ehowed the Co�iseioners a p3cture and an aerial photo af the lot in queation. Ms. Schnabe2 explained that the house preaeat�y oa the lot wsa uainhabitable and if the variance request was aot granted, the City votiid coa3emn the house end it wouZd be remwed. Ms. Schnabel pointed out that the aerial photo shovs several other 40 Yoot lots on the same atreet� so it Was Yelt that building � this lot �,rould be compatible xith the neighborhood. Ma. Schnabel also pointed out that the house immediate2y nort2� wsa a very nice haa�ee on a 40 £oot lot. Ms. Schnabel atated that as they discussed the request, it became apparent that the neighbors were very much in Yavor of Mr. Nedegaard tuilding on the �0 foot lot, and eince tbere were other homes On 40 fart lots on the sa�ne street� it seemed reasonable to grant the request, ratner than deny the request and let the City condes� the house� have it tarn dwn, xhich would take s�ue time, a� then be left vith an empty 40 Yoot lot. Ms. Schnabel stated that Clyde Morevetz had talked with Mr. Herrick, the City Attorney, e� Mr. Herrick Pelt it c�au2d not jeopardize the law suit becsuse the laW suit was concerned with a perswi `rhm had brought the lots tax °orPeit, thia lot wea a fu7.1 priced piece of pr�- perty, there was the question oP a corner �+0 foot lot as opposed to an interior �0 foat lot, and the neighbors in this case were very much 3n favor oY a nev dwelling on thia 40 foot lot. The aeighbors approached Mr. Pledegaard and asked him to do this. Nr. Nedegaard lives dovn the street Yrom the lot in question. Becavse of these facts, the Circumstances were quite different Prom the law suit case, and Mr. Herrick vould be villing to �*s'ite out a legal,interpretation for the City Council. Mr. Harrie stated thet he could see that this would be good for the neighborhood and Coulfl understand �r the neighbors wented it, but vas conoerned about setting e pre- cedent they vould be sorry foF later. Mr. Peterson stated that he had aoted t2�at Pat Gabel expressed the seme c�cerns in terms c�2f' her vote. Ms. Schnabel stated she did too, in fact felt that all the Co�isxioaers did, but by the same tokea� found it diYPicuZt to come up with reasons to deny it vith tlie neighbors then requesting it. Ms. Schnabel noted thst Mr. Kemper had steted thet if this had been a vacant lot� he probab�y never would hsve vated fc�r 3t, but because it did hsve a house on it that vas current]y being used until just recent�y, he felt more comfartable going slong rrith the request, Mr. Aerria asked �hat tbe diPterence was betveen this lot and another lot that's vecaut� other than thfs lat hae a houae c� it. _ . _.�, PLAI�ININC CO2�II+IIBSION MEE'PII�, NOVF�1BIIt 22� 1978 PAG$ 5 Ma. Schnabel etated that looking at it fra� aaother eagle, if this house vae far sale end aomeba3y bought it and decided to improve it, the City could do nothing ebout that. • Mr. Harrie atated that that could be done, esseatiel�V building e house +ithin e house� if the preaeat houae vss that bad. Mr. Harris atated that personal�y he felt granting the variance would be a good thing� but was uneasy about the consequences, _ mayhe not xith the present court cese, but a year fram noW. Me. Schnabel eteted that they may be faced rith theae same type of aituations in �yde Park. Mr. Harris atated that what they vere doirg then vas continuing the use of sub-standaz�d lots� which they had decided not to do. Ms. Schnabel atated that they had esid they would not permit new construction on vacant aub-standard lots, but in �+de Park thay had eaid they would permit existing use of sub-etandard lots to continue. Ms. Schnsbel also stated that Mr. Nedegsaid had in- dicated that this 40 foot lot cpst over $12,000 and because of this she felt that be- cauae coats are sky-rocketing sp much, they m�y have to allosr this kind of thing in order to continue to provide housing. tAr. Oquiat qnestioned whether they ehould be concerned about providing additionel housing when Fridley vas 9Q�, developed. Mr. &arris suggested they table this item for thr�: months� until Febraary� while they study it, and get a judgemeat from the prese: court case and know where they are going with the problem. Beceuse e�%erything i.. irozea arqtwqy� Atr. Nedega$rd xould n�t be able to do anything srith it until Spriag. Ms. Schnabel stated that on page 7� the 4th paragraph frca� the top should reHd: °Mr. Couture asked that if Lhe garage on Lot 5 were moved south 10 Peet� it Would sllo�r for a 50 Poot lot rather than a 40 o�ot lot� and vou3d`the City give a variance for a 50 Yoot lot". Ms. Schnabel stated thet on Page 7, the 5th paragraph frcmi the top, the wozYls "Yra� Mr. Traczik" should be deleted. Ma. Schaebel stated that oa Page 13, the 4th paragraph from the botta�! it should be 8 Yeet not 4 Yeet. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN FiAFtRIS DECLARID Ti� Mt7PI0N CARRIID UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Mr, Peterson, seco�ied by Mr. Lengenfeld to reco�end to Cocwcil that f�r. N-edegaard'a request to build on the � foot lot at 4626 2nd Street N.E.� be tabled Pvr 90 de�ys (December, Jaauary and February). UPON A VOICE VOTE� I�t. PETERSON� t+ht. LANGENF'ELD, MR. STO�2LA� 1+9�. OQUIST VClPLNG AYE, AND MS. SCHNABEL VOTING NAY, CHAIRMAft HARRIS DECLARED THE MUPION CARR� 5 TO 1. ..�et pLAIJNIl� COb4tIS5I0N 1�'PING, NWEAffiER 22, 1978 PAGE 6 5, xECEr� Exvu�oru�xraL eoat.rrx cor4assiox r�uvrES; ocx�� 17. 19'TS: MUTION by Mr. Iangenfeld, aeco�l by Mr. Peterson, to receive the October 17� 1978, Eavira�mental Qus2ity Co�iasion�inutea. Mr. Isngenfeld atated that on p e 2, letters Yrom Ma. Johnsai aaa Me. Schauls should Y�ave been included as part of th recoxci and vere not.included xith the minutes. Mr. IangenYeld stated that there �res a meeting at City Hall on Mondqy night uhich wes atteuded by FAA� MACy Metro Coun il� City oY Fridley Council, and Marst�a Bennett among others. Mr. Langeafeld stated t at the question of whether or not there was going to be sirport expansion was disc ssed, and also to incorporate u�ler the MnDdP program tbe discrepancies noted by thefr Co�i.ssion and othcrs. Mr. Langenfeld stated that it looked like the eirport expan ioa idea was in the making� and there vas taik of a Master Plsa with the approach of expaading piece by piece, Por example, £irst put in soane lights, then rreather inst nt flying� with each thing being a majCr change. Mr. I.Qngenfeld atated that there were indications o£ political involve�at also. ilr. Lsngenfeld stated thst thei Commmission vould be meeting with Nex Brighton F�C and uould be providing same ki of summary. Mr. LangenYeld atated tl�et regi fromi the bottom, Ms. Sporre mea be siilling to sperxl the time. 1�lr. Lengenfeld noted that they tk'ON A VOICE YO'1E� AI�L VQTII� , iJI+1ANIM01lST.Y. b. RECEIVE PARKS AND RECREATI� MOTTON by Mr. Petersan, pgrks end Recreation Cc Mr. I.aAgenfeld asked if Mr. mbiling. Ms. Sporre'a co�ments un page 7� 6th paragraph t i£ the ordiasnce could be enforeed� she woul,d a new member on his Co�i.seion, Mervin Hora. CAAIRMAN HARRIS DECT.ARED TFiE Mf7PI0N CARRIID COP+A9ISSTON by Ms. Schnabel to receive the October 23� 19T8, minutes. thoaght they could get co�on ground for sno�- l�r. Petersnm stated they had l�ased the Sears Property last year and i+�ere requesting it aga3n this year, but hadn°t heard yet. 1dr. �snge�eld stated thst he I(r. iaetersom did not thiaic liPe. Mr. Hsxz�is asked vhat could hpcicey piqying Praa the ice it s,*ouldn't be Locke Park. vould happen� beeause oY th+e problems rrith the xild done to divide the outaide rinks to aeparate the Mr, Petorsam stated thst most �f' the rinks are already aepsrated end most oY the designsted hockey riaks are n used very much by the foriml hockey progrem, but �re used by neighb�hood k3da. � pLpNNING COI�AffSSION MEETIi�, NOVEI�IIt 22, 1978 PAGE 7 Mr, Harria stated he was referring to the rink o0o the Stevenson School property ia particular, vhere therc has been a problem of hockey plqying oa the general rink. Mr. Peterson etated that it was s problem of enPOrcemeat. The rulea state that there are to be no hockey aticke or pucka on general rinks� e�l iY there isn't a hockey rink there, they shoul.d go to another rink designated for hockey pl.aying, Mr. Peteraon atated that it �as vritten in their general instructiona that there t+as to be no hockey plqying on general purpose akating rinka. Mr. Earria stated that he vould like to eee a eign posted on that riak prohibiting hockeY P�-�Yin6• Dh�. Peteraon atated he would make a note to get the general akating areas poated. The rinka vith earming houses are pasted and the attendeats are auppoeed to enforce it. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VdPING AYE, CHAZRMAN HARRIS DECLARED Ti� MO�ION CARRIE�D UNANIMOUSLY. 7, RECEZVE Tf� Ii(JMAN RESOURCES COhA4iSSI0N MlNtll'ES: rvovEIYIDER 3, 1978: M(YI'ION by Mr. Storle, seconded by Mr. Oquist� to receive the Human Resources Minutea of November 3, 1978. N�. Storla noted they tiad diacuased the International Year oP the Child on page 1 of the minutea. Mr. Storla pointed out Afr. Peter Flem3ng's remarks regarding the Memorandum oP Rgree� ment on psge 3 of the minutes and stated that they had spent until 11:00 on the A9emorandum of Agreemeni and realized that although they knew all the parts and their iater-relationships, they vere not groceeding in sny order. Larry Dobson suggested they start cuttiag and pasting to put it in an order that did make sense, and final�y came to the conclusion that even if they did maximlze its understandibility, it would still be vague and redundsnt. They then decided thet the department should come up vith a nev one. Mr. Oquist stated that he was coa�used about who wrote the Memora�ium of Agreement. Mr. Aarris explai.ned that the Auman Resourcea Comm�iesion received the 2�moramium of Agreement from the State, and when they ceme to the Planning Coa�ission with it� the Planning Cc�nissioai asked them to set up guidelines and gosls as to hw they would implement the Memoran�um of Agreement. When they had finished writing up the guide- lines� they had in reality srritten up a aew Memorsndum of Agreement. Mr. Storla stated that the original one that the PZanning Coa�isaion had revieved was the oae from the State� end that was the one Mr. Peter Fleming had commented on. Mr. Storla pointed wt the Flw Chart on the last page which they madified fraai the one Coon Rapids bad developed. Mr. Aquist suggested tt�st they devise their rnm Memorandum oY Agreement end ask the Stete to sign it. Mr. Starle stated thst they vould reviev the nev �e and if it vas like the last one, they would have to c� up with one of their ovm. pLANNIMG C01+BrtISSION MEF.TING, NdVEMBER 22, 1978 p� 8 Mr. Iiarria suggested they forget about sen.ding say lettera to the State� as Mr. F2eming had auggested. Mr. Storla stated that they waald not deal with the lest Memorandum oP Agree�nt� and Sf they vere going to deal with the State, it �+ould heve to be �+ith a diYferent one. UPON A VOICE VOrTE� ALL IPOYIP� AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARID THE MOTION CARRIED S, RECEIVE THE EI�RGY PROJECT CONII�ffTTEE MINUPES: NOVEMBEK 1� 1978s MQTION by t�h�. Peterson� aeco�ed by Mr. IsngenPeld to receive the Nov�mber 1, 1976� Energy Project Co�nittee Miautes. • Mr. Harris stated that they have had another meeting since the November lst meeting� an8 pagea 5 and 6 list ac� of the things they discussed at that meeting. Mr. Harris eteted that at the next meeting� they Would be voting for e chairman. Mr. LangenPe2d pointed out tbat on page 2, he vas referred to as the chairman a�od it shovld be Mr. Harris. Mr. Aarris stated he felt very aptimistic about the Cc�mittee and Peels they have some very good people on the Coammittee. Mr. Langenfeld stated that they had Mr. Bill Davis fra� the �tate F�hergy Commi.ssion there aad Mr. Davis talked ebout a mini-audit they had taken on a large business in St. Paul end without tmking eny major alterations tC bulldings or saything like that� they just taged things like lights.on, etc,, and sared $25,�• Mr. Herris stated that Mr. Davis slso stated that they saere using the Fridley Eaer� Project Coam�ittee £ormat and charter as a model for setting up their Cc�i.ttee. Mr. Iiarris atated thet as they discussed the di£Yerent facets of energy conservation� Mr. Davis had some interesting coarments auch as an econanic crisis zvas vhat they were real�jr ta3kiag about. Mr. Harris also stected that es they talked it seemed that the Stete was not wil2ing to lead, but willing to follow. AYter asking Mr. Davie varioue questions, Mr. Davis responded that they have the suthority, but do not have the en- forcement authority. Mr. Langenfeld stated that he had asked Mr. Davis vitY they were being asked, ea individusls to turn the thermostats davn, vhen large department stores weren't and bfr. Davis reglied thst they do not have the euthority to meke the department stores turn down their thermostats� all iihey can do is sak. Mr, Storla stated that there was proposed legislatian that 1Y you sell your houae, you must heve an energy inventory, aad you must hire a peraon qualified to do the energy inventory� and the seller can vaive the Pee. Mr. I.engenfeld stated thst Mr. Wall had indicated an intereat in Block Partiea, uhere neighbors vould ana�yze each other'a ha�ne and then� if necessary� purchase the inevlati�n in volu� to save money. Mr. Peterson stated the prob2em tirais not in b�ing in nol�e, but that there xas nothing available to b� that does the job, in terms of eolar collectors an�i eolar heat. 1�. Aarrls stated tt�at the inaulation c�paniee cannot b� iasu2ation. \ PLANNING COM4�II53ION MEEfII��IiOVEhffiII2 22. 1978 PAGE 9 Mr. Oquist etated that he had ineulated about two years ago and rras saving about 25`� on hie bill, but it appeere that as more people inaulate and use leas energy� the ratea keep going up beceuae the utility camipanies heve to make their praPit. People begin to feel thet even if they insulate, it wovld nCrt save them money. Mr. Peterson atated that lf they had not insulated� the billa xould k�ave gone up even more. Mr. Storla stated that lou ixicome people pqy ten times more of their gross iacome on eaergy than middle inco� people. Mr. Herris i�licated that oa page 1 of the minutes, he had stated that the target date vas 3une 30, 1979, and that if they felt they needed more time, the Planning Cor�iasion rrould extend it. t+h�. Harris esked that Mr. Langenfeld give them progresa reports on the Ca�itte. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING pYE� CHAIRMqN HARFtIS DECLARID T[� M(xION CARRI� UNANIMOUSLY. 8, CONTINUED: MEMORANDUM OF AGREE:�h'T MOTION by Mr. Storla, seconded by Mr. Langenfeld to tabTe the Memorandum oY Agreement until the language can be vorked out vith the State Department of Human Righta. UPON p VOICE VOTE, ALL VCJSING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRTID IJPIANIMWSLY. 9. COP)TiNUED: REVIEW OF SIGN ORDINANCE AT DIRECTION OF CITY COUNCIL MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Oquist to table the review of the aiga o�ance. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTII� AXE� CHAIRMAN FiARRI5 DECLARED Tf� MCYSION QARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 10. OTHER BUSINES3; A. Mr. Langenfeld asked that they use the other k3nd oP booka for the agendas� because the psges Ysll out of these. B. Mr. LangenYeld distributed lettere regarding the opening oP the Congregste Dining Project� end stated that the Co�issioners c�ere welcome to come on tbe apening d�y. Mr. Langenfeld stated tbat the people involved vith the Fr3dley site are very exclted about it, and '9r. Langenfeld stated that the program sras vexy benePiciel because it not only provides needed nutrition, but allo*as the people to socialize while they dine. 1�. LangenYeld stated they s�etimes have movies, sing-e-longs, or nutrition education after the meals. Mr. Langenfeld stated that reservstions must be made 2 days in advance. Ms.• Schnabel aeked if the meals were prepared on site. Mr. Laogenfeld steted thst the meals rrere prepared by the Nutritioa Center - in Minaeapolis. PLANNIN(7 CONIIdISSION MINUfE3 NOVF'MBER 22, 2978 - PAGE 10 C. Mr, Harrie stated that he an3 Mr. Lengenfeld and the City Council had met with the perspective caneultanta on the revltalization af the dovmtovn area. Mr. Harris felt there Were a x3de range oY prices xhich v�re inacurately quoted in the paper. The 2ow one vas $15�500 and 1Y you sdded all the proposale to- gether� which the peper failed to do� they ceme to $35,� �r �+2i�, whlch Mr. Harris felt vas rather exorbitsnt. Mr. Lengenfeld stated they were going to do it in phasea. Mr. Harris stated that he was not altogether sure they real�y needed e consultant on the drnmtowa area, and felt the City Council should conaider it Yurther. Mr. Harria stated that vhst they reca�mne�ied wae that they atage the atudy in phasea, such sa complete phaee 1 and make a report and then the City Council caul@ decide whether they wanted to go on to phase 2, etc. The Council asked the cansultants if they would do it that way, and ttxe consultants agreed. Mr. Harria stated that hopePully they would do it tkiat way, because he was not sure they would vsnt to do the Whole area. Mr. Oquist suggested that Phase 1 should be to decide rrhether they waat to re- vitalize the dc�crotrnm or nat. Mr. Harris stated that Phsse 1 would be a,n inventory of the area and concurrance of the people in the area, snd aPter that vas completed they could decide if they xanted to go on to Phase 2. tM. Harris stated tl�at he did not ihink the Council should co�nit ttemselvea to the whole thing until Phase 1 was co�pleted. Mr. fiarr3a suggested tlzet the Commissioners think about it and iY they wan�ed to, they could make a resolutian to Council at the next �eting. Mr. Peterson stated that t�e Planning Coaunission should 'oe involved in tbe planning process and the �iring of consultanta cras certa3nly part oP the planning process, aad so they should go on record one vay or another regsrding thir+, and wnuld like to see the consultants proposals. Mr. Hsrris requested the copies oY the consvltants propose2s be sent to the members oY the Planning C�ission xith the next age�a. NSOTIOPi by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Storls to adjourn the November 22, 19'JS �ing Co�mission meeiing. iJPON A VOICE VOTE� ALt YOTING AYE� C&AIRMAN HARRIS DECLAAID THE MEETING ADJOL�tI�D AT 9:50 P.M. RESPECTFULLY SITBMI2"PID: � �� r ��_31-�- Katt�y 3he1 on� Recordiug Secretary BUE3LIC HEARIh1G ` BEFORE THE �'-'" pLAPJNINr, �Oi•tMISSTON _�:- -_ - - Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6a31 University Avenue Hortheast on 4Jednesday, December 6, 1978 in the Council Chamber at 7:36 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Proposed Prelimin�ry Plat, P.S. �78-06, Caba Realty First Addition, by Ray R. Wormsbecker, being a replat of all of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, T-30, R-24, Anoka Caunty Minnesota, except the South 877.87 feet thereof, lying Weste'rly of State Trunk Highway No. 47. Subject to easement far utility purposes over the North 20 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northviest Quarter, lying Westerly of present State Trunk Highway No. 47 except the Easterly 175 feet thereof, and the l�lest 2Q feet of the Easterly 115 feet of said South�vest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, lying tdesterly and adjacent to the West l�ine of State Trunk Ni�ghway No. 47', generally locatec at 83 and University Avenue N.E. Any and a11 persons desiri;�g to be heard shal7 bp give an opportunity at the above stated time and place, RTCHARD CHAI P,�4AN PLANNTMG Publish: November 22, 197& November 29, 1978 H. HItRRIS COiAM I SS I Oi`J �z r,,,---'' CI7'Y OP PRIDLCY A7INNLSO'CA , �' �' P[✓INNINC ANU ZONTNG FOIiM NUMI3GR , • �'� �� D� �9 Af'PLICMIT'S SIGNft G 8--.! �A�A��_� Address 320Q PI. Lilac Dr. Minne� alis *7N. Telephone Number 586-5�'74 PROPERTY OIVNL=R'S SIGNATURE Address 3140 Chowen Ave. So., Minne�polis, MN TYPE OF RGQUCST. Rezoning Special Use Pexzait ?X ApQrovai of Prenin- inary F� Pinal Plat Streets or Alley Vacations Other Telephone Number 9z5-2g4g Fee?31a,OCReceipt !io, 93�i� Street Lncation of Praperty 83rd & IIniversity Are, N,E, Legal Descrip�ion of Yroperty SW3- of N�l4 of Sec. 2, fi. 30, R. 2k� exce�t So. ?77.3? f;. Present Zoning Classification C-2-5 &� F.xisting Use of Property Ja�snt Acreage of Propez�ty l2 acres t Describe Uriefly the prcaosed zoning classification or type of use and improvement proposed lTas the present applicanf: previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a l.�t split ac variance or specsal use permit on the subject siCe or part of it? yes na. What was requested and when? The undersigned undexstands th�t: {a) a list of a11 residents and o�+-ners of ?roperty within 300 feet (350 feet for rezor.ing) must be attached to t�is a�plication. (U) This application must be signed by all oianers of the pre�erty, o: an ea�ias�ation given why this i_s not the case. (cJ RcsponsibiliYy ior any eefec� i� tl-�° proceetiing> resultin� £rom the failure to lis*_ Lhe names and addresses af all Tesid^^±s �,� property owners of pxopexty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and strucYure must Ue dratian and attache', shawing the follo�aing: 1. North Direction. 2. Location of propo'sed structure o�i the lat. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front anc side setbacics. 4. Street Names. S. Location and use o£ adjacent existing ouildin�s (tivithin 30o feat}. The undersigne� hereby declares that all the facts an3 representations stateL in this application are true and correct. DATE r0 ( ( � �7 � SIGNATURE�, !�`.f',f �,� � � -� � �� . � (Ai'PLICANTj Date Filed Uate of Hear Planning Commission Approved (daLes) �Z'�-7�' Dmiied City Council Approved (daL�s) /-��p Denie� . "`�„4' - - - - ---�-- PLANNING COMMISSION 11/21i78 i City Council �_, _ MAILING LIST P.S. #78-06, Caba Realty First Addition Ray R. Wormsbecker 3200 N. L�lac Drive Minneapolis, Mn 55422 Bryant Investment Company Wi7liam Barbush 52II University Avenue S.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55414 House of Lords 1313� Island View Drive Elk River, Mn 55330 Viking Chevrolet 7501 Highway ;65 N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 City of Spring Lake Park Zoning Administrator 8429 Center Drive N.E. Spring Lake Park, Mn 55432 ,�. � .. .' i 4, �r � ^ ♦ ; . . : : .� ; � -;� " r . . . . ru< ' .�Y w.I�. � I . . . �s ir..f:.aw : �. � � '� � . � xNarsr..r4��....._.. .� "'� � .J �� ,y� .,; . LJ . . �y �� i.ri � �.T �, i„°`- I �� .�, /lrre/ �°. y 1Z ` 'r�e �� „�_. P.S. #78-06 CA6A RERLTY FIRST ODf�. „ ,o: 1; 9s :o � d `` �l q �_ .r� w..ra...eo�',��w�fo.sw�rs...ms <j( (,s M Ct�saJ �.. . ISLFl. . vl , , u �r I �.�. � t � o l,�! N/Y'fSF4f: . ' � , _ � . ' �"' � � i! . `,�f � �i Gise) i�. r-�"' { � ✓C9°f>.a-E �` ,. 1v -- �r� i... fi�t � � . . \i ._ �. ._ w !. ,.��af ' • t y h� 1 :.: � Z' F: , ........ .. �........ ' �y i , � � � �..oJ� ;. � � ,� � . �, , � _. ��rsv _ ' �% � � i ' isl. ,�e . � y f I 6 1 I �''. f/4o, v � I k_�� I V �.6s „_ � � � (ioo) �� ' = ,our�or<a �: � s � e� �£WatK ES6sT - � : : .. "_._` c - . " ii �0.� � � d . . ee�a�a��,��c�mi�-s.ec�c.�n�e�.�4s °°°,J �( � ..., r�w,_.a � . F'r A I._.:.... I _.._. �—e9�i-ra� � —__. _ . . -t�: _ n � •. . N U2 JL/ Fi � Y•� � ('� .( � c f ►' c� � /36SeJ . `�. � ' ��V � �varv �G.�r,s+� = • _ . _ ... i� ' . . ' Ltt.�r. � � . � i ,•. + g � � .. •i�-u�t�srta:-i � s-e�a e-ra e c� �� i �. :- -r ��,� � I � ` '•-� \ IA w. .,.� _ , _ . . . . � . .�._...'•�•..,'. ._.. _ _... . � t �(. _,. - . k`Y _ . . . .. .. . .- . ', � . -. �� • . . . � ' . H�.r�rGFt�fel�TSM: SBf/! ' '. _ - � _ . � � - . . . . . , . . . _ � ��> � e riirGJ : az9a � � � I /3iDOi u � � � ; rl30�� 1"_ � a i�� i c� z r,;�+ t''3 � U1IYLOT' 13 ,��, � `- � ;� . � � i t, 1� -\�f M F�;,,. - . j ts<ss i � l . � � �� ' i � � � � � Q !zse) F- � f�L^ ; a � o aur�or r2 � � i a � , r �S � , � � � � � . � 4 � � .. e � � � N� � � � �_" � M F- 0 J r � O • ,�ml � �''�'y �/'.�,� �✓ i�� „i;v�� '.a.� �. 7'3Q iE'2d on I ' 6 ., :rce;y `V � Z.f12�CJ A . u/. � ' _ �_�. ' ..�` ' � . /✓c.,-�.�?s�� idc�y �as,�.z � , i I � -- : . S�. s, �s-- .,.. /) � 1 � , .. __� _ _- „ --a7z�q_._� -, .l ._,:�`�.f•.ir:7� ��,_r-� � �.r_n � v - -'- -�,-�� :�:.4� � �' }__ ...� '2._S7'�i ��,�«"�. �� . _ __... . . ."' __. .1 � Y.. i�~�i .��_' . _. .. "----� ai '- .+:iL;��' -.� ,.� ' .-... �.,�fr�..�. . ,._ . ' _ y �. _,_ .. . __ /�..-_ _ � , { �� . �,�L-' �,JE+Y -!lf..t1(/! -%a�L.�fSPAAnl� - V r 0m �' • : � , • y " � � �t+ / t / / � Q `n"� d'I� f O � / _' � - •�� U � .J �.' 1� � �M i ---- M � �v� V.� . �l C� / i' f -� O'`\ Iu H'` �'.; �. V / I'� ��,` I y' "__- �b�\_,II I:� jT✓� ,4 � �y� ti S. J o `I � �'��' ��',f� _ / ;q�:i �� I �� a � �� r f v,. _ `�.s_ ` �^� I t �i �� \ � ��_ //fJ• J `��` 6g � Y J\ � . ! � � � - / � � A � 1 � ��. � � 0 � . � � � i�! ` �� n� � � � � ' J a � � 1 WI � ` ' � i' _ ry ~Cp �-- , � I � � W � i1 1 _ - I f � ,` .' i�� 80 o i '� i j'. J � I J i � �' � � � ' % : i. ' 3vri � �� ;� � \� ,,� � � �i o � -�yi` 9�`, ; 1 ;�� .�;! : , �� a y i 0 o'i��+� � � 1 G• i�x � /s I f,,�,'�i��:\ n ti �+ `a"�' i �` ___� �=�_ _� �I�`i��a.T��P��, y r � `� d'3 ..-�� `� - r� - n i �� I R1� � .v � {1 7 � `\ . o i�� ._' �, m\ Pl; �! � �I� 4 fR A .. � , �--•-'� • w�� °�p`�„Q'.ki '. i 1:�1 JI �� tn- (� F` ' ; �. 9 ,{j�^} ly i ' !: A --I U (K�\ ■ � M1 �"�.�'-'�c:'--�l:b�l>:� � +�. �. � 6 � � � � i^� � � � ,�i .. � � � `\ � � � T �1 B�tf +. \ .�l�I,,� I ^ rr Jb \ `' I, U � i � d6 � '��:`i' . I'':� � --� , � , �, � �, � � � � � � �� v�� o � �; �,� � A � � � O. \ ` \, ```` 39y `. � I � �' f � O ` a — O , � �i 1`'s "' _'A I :' !. th �- —� .-- p � O `` r,0 � 169i� ' . ` �. •!'.�. I p ' J � � Y �,�W_ _`-6'cA-'' .. / g7O-1 i '' {i � �'v, Z i I � 4'� � ' � ' � �-�� 4i�=\ '� � ° � � � • \ . � 4 -r 1 >, . I. U-,'r�,4 �� ' M I � �� \, � �(� 1{;�' f cP � �"� y� pJ \ �rg70� I � •_' `v�.'PI.ItI � �` •J �� 0 ^_ . v � '� ' \,,,,€ ~ , I � �I �� 2� � ` � i . ��1 �� '� i�� o E � � 9 0� m�;:�yi;;, ' � � 3 q � �ejQ �'; p �-,� � I�,�oi'�n, W; � `�� N� ^V i I'f''�)� I m� t.�I � � 4 �. .tv r . �i.�l � 6.\ � I � � _ - -r- i ', 4 i Y\ht� � � rlq� _'.r� ,...'I � �l' � �� < A � -- � --�- � �� 1 7 � I q � •, . 1 �. � �• � .�,� C a � -' • n " �—� �� ;�,9 _ � , I 9° r '° -�� :i ' �---_ , , p o' /�.f% ��:�. i i /. \ �� ; . � y , ,'; '� � >.9 �� ? I : � � •, � /� �°'.a' . � I j; ; � � �`. f � . f. ` � ',. � .�� ,_ 3 ,{ I � 'Z B a' � �;, ��.� f i� � C �� "_-_ - (�}' i n�� °. 4�b'�4 I �� . 1 �. � T T� V � '� � ,/ i w A 4 ; � G� �„� � n�{ /..., r / t. A ^ / � b�� w � r �� .; . �11 I �� -_� � 5ti � '� � ! I ,� � � ' \ � , �^'.� q ci j� Y `ix/n�2o f:aa� �% .` i f�l � I �._.��. �._._ �_� ._. . `y� i .,. �. d � .'... �Q . _ .�' ' � � � . � I _.�_ � C' I �-� .J�. r,��:� f-._._._ � , L"� � � I �� . �: _---- .,-... y.•r z�., _ � , , �yr- - --- - - _. � S O°�p[j ,y^�, - � � "�� V . ,. . �^ -- _ ._.. _' � _ . -- .' i. {<,__ �� - � _ PUBi.IC tlFItRING � %' E3EFGRF TfIE _ PLlINNING COPiMiSSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City af Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on �dednesday, December 6; }97g in the Council Chamber at 7:30 F.h1, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Soecial Use Permit, SP #78-13, by Steven Hansort, D�B/F P1innesota Petroleum Service, per Section 205.101, 3,0, or the Fridley City Code, to allow saies and service for the installatfon of service station eou.pinent an Lots 20, 21 an..d 22, }31oc.k 13, Hamilton's Addition to Piechanicsville, the same being 5333 University Avenue N.E. A . Any and al] persons riesiring to be Leat°d sha71 be give an ogportuniLy at the above staied time and place. Publish: November 22, 197II November 29, 1978 P.ICHARD H, FIARRIS CNAIRMAN PLAPlNIhlG C01Y1h9ISSI0N �� 9 � CITY QP PRIDGLY MIAlNI;S07'A �{,� � PLANNTNG AND ZON3NG 1'ORM t1U�if3G�/ %,� / ftPPLIC/U:T'S SICNATURE .3`j'�-��;-�i� 1-i Aus,oV'1 � /�l�f ' d naar�5s � 9 5 5 To�,n�, a�� i� ,�.�%Y�� s Telephone Number �j39 — �Z� PROPERTY OiVNER'S SIGNATURE (�zs;�kX.�� /`��,��im �i� y.1j, . � �� TYP£: Ci• RGQt]IiST Rezoning _� Special Use Pennit Approval of Premin- inary $ Final Plat Streets or Alley Vacations Address�ySO ir�e�i.�n -brz��e ��s SSYI�� Other Te2ephone Number �s $�{ - O� 9 � �'� �______��' ✓ ..�✓ �� --'°-' , Fe%�2eceipt Plo. �390`� Street Locatinn of Property 5,3,�..3 L�/)/L'F,4'.Li7sr /;�C'P.� . ------:— Legal Description of Property [afs zo, 2/ /nct/ia;ucs�� Il Present Zoning Class%fication ��% Existirg Use of Property Acreage of Property ��(� Describe brieily the proposed zoning classi£ication or type of use and improvement Uroposcc; :J� �r�i�F �s /��n ��4N.w;� ,��,x �g�,p..,�„r o � ""u° y _�P_;y �--..-:��-�'��L [n 5/.+�t °md Md lM3i�Xi ��KnT�n :�t'frdP c{. TcrY�a.� //rSTACL rima¢nCY F�fAST 2Yrl1 �f-c /Un L�"e o�F 1'+�ce c.��l� �I-f °� IC<r•MC� ��I�wnd 2�d aM� or�.� 1�ue3 in %��+�-nG b/d�. . �CYa �� 6< u�d t�_4�om,�s?n<i "¢.�i<>ii—te•�- l,eia�..r_=}.'ecf .^-, d i�lY�£.',a_.••!•:ns.s2 • 4.'a!' e ef ��.�reJ�an�ji t S:rJ. :res heitr, .7i<.nxn./se.sr �. Gury 2&sd af�ri si.�,.z�/ y;i.Eed.1{ �/Yn.s h .�-ot }�e �eF fx' C� as �ie pr.ese�it app��.cant previously soudht t.o rezone, plat, obtain a lot spli: or variance or special use permit on thz subject site or part of it? yes�_no. Y�hat was r.equested and «�hen? ,_ . 7'he undersigned understands that: (a) a list of all res:dents and owners of' property within 300 feet (350 feet for rezoningi must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all oianers of the property, or an explanation given iahy this is not Clie case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceeciings resulting from the failure L'o list the names and ad3resses of all resideuts and property owrters of property in question, belorgs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structnre must be drawn and atYached, sho�ain� the follo�aing: 1. North Direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the Iot, 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side seLbacks. 4. Street Names. 5. Location and usc of adjacerit existing buildings (+:•ithia 300 feet). Tlie undersigned hereby dcclares that all the facCS and representations stated in tliis application are true and co:rect. � DATE // % , --r- Aate Filed Planning Commission Approved (dates) Denicd_ _ City Council Approved (datcs) Uenicd �; „ [� Planning Commission 11/21/78 City Council_ MAILIN& LIS7 SP#78-13 STEVEN NANSON, D/B/A/ MINNESOTA PETROi_EUM SERUICE Steven. Hanson 1955 Johnson Street N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55418 Mr. & Mrs. Gordon Graham 5334 4th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Arvid Peterson 5320 4th Street N.E. Amoco Oil Company Jim McDonald 4940 Viking Drive Minneapolis, Mn 55435 General Realty Company 4601 Excelsior Blvd. Minneapolis, Mn 55416 Mr. & Mrs. Homer 1�1elton 5340 4th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Wa�me Flentie 5310 4th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Herbert Ledo 5326 4th Street N,E. Fridley, Dtn 5542� Marlene 0'Donnell 5300 4th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 5542� Wayne B. Peterson 1359 Park Drive Mound, Minnesota 55364 � �O S � a . � � ` � ^� 0 �, �U �F � � • O S � Z "s � ., �- � v'�r w� gPk � � ai T i6 0.1' e�$ � .� I I I La N � a T ro � n K � x' �v N . � --- o . ,� � v � .� -, � ti� d.: _ � � o- k C � �� U [+f O � a � � CM1 ro x� N � a �`, ° �— � � �- � � i� �r�__o � C r i� O b x � o � ' - F s H�R- C. �' Q n .. �yK x i?;, �� +'✓i � P • � � • ' �� P�e 0 � • � � � • • f� ery A �� V p�� " � 6 b � � � s5 6gy cr !! y r U �-� s �T I / r� �'� �� a . ;�' � ; . � p � �f F � �6'a ? �?i ]�n � � /� � �� c � i & �{ �o-' .- �-� F� C !6 ,.e 9 t'` x� �'.1 v �,��.•�.�,Ar Y � Y fii""� �•, j.5 � �{ �G � � �MI ��.�' i �� ( �� R � c� r- y ��"G� I ro� P ? ��.F' P.� T1 �2 F �' q,, �, ° -�j 3 e" -o m � _ .. � d �� G S' � � G � � � 1 7 ...s' �. i 4 � � � r � �A � l � � � r`' � L C c �� c i��' N . � 3 � n ,'� .�. Ni I l� c� � � B � � n �c v �c � ` J z � `� � r �i � � � � �1� , �o �'l �� > , ..--- ........,...�.--.,�,_...-.....•-_-,.,.�,,,-,.-,..._._...,....,--...._--.-.-....._ __.__�.,._...- __. (,{� , f\c�.11R OuTSi�G Dooa bY e�1v �ioe�.. �ah ecw�.eA'3v�c? . .�%O� �('e'c? • . . �, (Zemeue ��-+� d��u� rn�rsn« F��proa� l.�`�.�s a�, �1 ecde aiyn bas�. . 3� Rer.�c.�� -wo i:�ian.� y-�Sk�'S Ys.r� �+o �arv.�ae� endS . Cr.ncnl. �-a, p��+,p is5w.l lwies h�a ci�s��v��r e_lek.4e�ie. �nawc %�d�, �� Iwifw�.l �"•aMs t�t� SIOC 119�� Or.. C+��w�ltnat u>� . l 3� �n�MU. c�,.r�o� P��e. i'3efL �eru.iosed� f,} �n��wlt CnmPnn., s�e�Y, nn'�i�..� o�` i,ic�c, c�ea¢�.e�- o�ce ci,m0.„ \ �� `�aPf3 nn� J.�. �:7bt�C �C+ 'N� \ 01� S�'oC34 C' '7-1R. � ICy t�C[4�' .. 11 � n L �na te�Ner�e. Y1�� , ��oti� �V.✓..� �n'�e.�v,� K'-�• O'S ia�ciy a /�` te� p) Cl.r.e.a n..v u.�`, �d,.�Fi- V�o9, �o1,�cv�'c 7�oca.`e -^-�'.�"�-- �-es\ e�j�•�w,u+r , 0 9� (n;�.t1 c.4.�,.:. �.,�� t.coif+� y�a.ao i� t.3�, a'i b1'�1� �s.��pco�. . i � �+'i a iS . _`�i�C;eye e� F^Sa 'r.�o��Pk�,.�,.T � Qot��.bl•c 2r_i« Ccm.�a*s�w:..a 1rwY.:� �rra<.i<,�-- a'}`.. �°i 0 . r' ` .'"` . . .P � �,. 0 . . .. . . _. � . _ . � "�`�....A` T%t�R�'� �i��OS. �N�C. TH.ORPE � . � �. �B I 80E5 WAYZATA RLVD. !� p�� .. . h7innenpolis,Minn.553?6 �r S, Telephone Area Code 612 333-2133 GOMhfERCIAL — INAUS'T'RIAL REAUOR' PURCHASE AGREEMENT o�{ FOPµ AppROVED BY �.qEATER MINNE4P0�,15 /.0.E/� 60ApOOF FErLTOFi� - {fEBRWRY� tf)31 �J`/e��y�1� 19 ./� RECEIVED OF Steven J. �I;�nson anc; Rom�r D. Nauaer., doint ienants - the sum ot � 0'iF_ T'ri•';uS�ii`� A717 tl(11'E`.11 -'-'-"'-'-"""-"-'-'.� s 1,^".�.00 ) DOLLARS Ci7erk as ea�nest money and in par[ payment (or the purc�ase of proy?rty (C��ek. C�� aS No��_9uy WnYeM11. at �33� l-nva siiv Av��nu� p�v r'ridl �v . situated in the __ County of ��COi;a � , Sta[e o( Mi�aesoca, and legally desnibed as follows, to-wit: � � Lots��, 21 ar.d 22, 81ocf: 73, !{.3;ni?tan's AdCitian to i!ecbanicsoi ... . . , ,C-c;'? .� 11 � . .. . . . ��. �.t; < G�--�c;??�f'- � U��i• � � a;l p'! ivhich p[oDerry [he undersigned has this day sold W the buyer Cor the swn o[: �'� �oka Caunty, t;ir.n2sota �jt� i . ... .. , : .:. �...,�....:..� �,,,:. „�,i i .,� '"'_""'_'"_"'"""_""'" ( S '�.:�i:i'i:'n7C which the Uuye� agrees to pay in thz tollau�ng manner. � - ? DOLLARS, Earnest money 6ecein vd s 1.90� � and�,g � �"'R C^ , cash, on � C e?4ar' 7!5' 1973 �� )� � i � �i� . y�, , [he date of closing. tfl� ba?3nce of $� +��_,-��"sha}�t�-�`1;aia �n ash nn clate ef clo�ir� if buyer; can,obtain finonci�g f�r this z om*, or( "��j,�rJ� n�hy er2�r�ct�.i'o* c' e��...�`-iR��sot3 !t. � a��R?> i . pattj)PV�t s=f}er and ruy�r oa,"ahld in ,�st�rT...e4� of S:'?�,�T.p:r m��L7> or r.ct,....! t.5�� '.1^nnt� o` t�a buy�r, includir,❑ inter�s,� at h. ,at��;�F�'�% par ::nnpm comput?d �eninly�on unpaid Saianc dnt=r?;t shall run f�ron dacz op closirg. Fir;t pa;�nen} sl�atl F,e due and payaS'.� nn th= i5th day n� da:ivary 1'�79 end saccea8im� p�r;erats shall he �ue and payable on the 75t'� �a, o` zach � dfi�J every ranth $h?�c'd.`tC^_ pdY�'2ry[5 S!'d:j G� CY'd�t�a first to 1Ot,yr�SL "dlld r�a,aainder LO pri��4oa]! The �n!ire t=z�7::nc� or thTS contract shali b� d , � ue ..nd payable in `u.l no la±zr t�a13i;.': _�r�ber 15, � :�Tt,,..�;;';;` �.a.-- � -'� � YE i�iund��od,Ithe�°`e�e`�i� r,o;r a co��trac f. „ an (., t for de^d o^�cord acair,s` said re�.ise; r:i±h �:,^.aid ba]ance of ap�+ro:,i��!�cely °+2:'..50:;, wnici cattrac: tha'6vyzr Goes rot zssuTe ^er a r�_ Co yay �u2 w,yicM is to ba paio a�cord�i�ig to its ter��s 6y tn� sellnr. ':^a s:lizr rzs�r¢>_s ti�e riy:5�.c; rn°inance tne p,es2nt e�?n2gnct a= eny ti;�w :ehich shall rtnt by i#s te:�*�s a7ter th� tsr!r= .Y*_�.�i; ccn:rar,� rr.;r .:xceec '-;_ �ecntrzc,. 4alanez „� ra+.z e� int2rest at1:r,�-, *-;-�. lt is further understood that 1/12tfi of the yearly property taxes are to be paid with the contract for deed commencing with the January 15, 1979 payment. This offer incl��es all buried tanks, hoist�safe and air compressor on premises. This offer is contingent upon buyers inspecting subject property mechaniclly and structurally and thereafter accepting sam� iq its present "as-is" condition. This offer is iurther contingent vpon buyer'S obtaining from the City of Fridley, acceptable assurances that buyers can operate their 6usiness, that of sales, service and installat�on of service station equipment, in subject premises. . . •� This offer shail be deemed null and void and all earnest rtroney paid herein returned to huyers if by December 1, 7978, buyecs do rot accept property in iYs present "as-is" condition or do not receive acceptable assurances from the City of Fridley that buyers can operate their bvsiness in subject premises. �eemen[ shn11 ba nuil and vma, a�a neimer pnnapal shall be liahle for damages hereunAer w �Ae ot6er pnncipal. A71 money theto bfore ppad by [he buy¢r shall Le relunded. If t�e [iqe b flaitl pcOperty �e (om�d mark^taWe ot bc so ma6e ujthin said time, and saia buyer shall default in ar.y ot �he agreements and continu^ in defaui[ for a period o! 10 Ceys, [hen and in t�at case [he se7fer may ter- minal¢ Ihls wnhact antl on such termenation a11 the payments made upon.this con[ract shail Le retaineA hy szid se31m anG saltl agem, as tAeir respective int¢rests may apPeaq as 7iquiGateC damnges, pnia GeinR �f the esser,ce ncreof. T�is p.ovision sAall no[ depnre eiNer party of the right of enforcing Me specific p¢�formnnce nf this wntract provided such cor.uact shall not be terminated es a(ore eaid, uid provitl¢d action ro enlorce suc� specifle qec[ocmaz�ce shall be rommenced wi�hin six months af[er such rig�t of acnon sha11 friro. It is unders[ootl and agreed that Nis sale is maAe suejece w me appraval by the owner ot said premises In writing and �ha[t�e undusigned agent is in no manner labta or msponsiOle on accoun[ of t�ia agreement, ¢icept to rewrn or account for the eamest money � D��4 untler this conluct. It is nnde�atootl tTai sellerlbuyer ras '� days to ancept Ne terms and conditions o( this purchase agreemen4 � 7Te Aelivery af all yapets and rtronies shtl� be m>Ee at �Ae o(llce of: YHORPE 6ROS.lIJC., 8085 Wayzata Boulevazd 77NORPE BROS. Q�'C, � ; I, �ha on0eralBned. owner of ttie above pmpenY. do FeveUY II By /�i�2'} /(�.ti.i: /-✓� .. �pyrove Iha aMVe ag�eement and tne sAle thereGy made. y,,yr, .��;;-; ., � AFmt � �� l hert0y eg�ee m pureb>se �ne saiA proyeriyfoethe price ar,d upon thetermsa0ovementionetl and sub)ect �o-ill cuoditiona h<re• � _ � III BYD!lBSed/ .. . . ii; ; � ,� ,,;,;,., .�,ge, .'i.G..<k j��:I� (SE, �' 4 I � IS A LEGALLY BINDINC COHTRACT. IF NOT �/ , _(SEAW �� I.s.l . p ..,Y . .. x � r j, j:� . �� ..�. . �.,_____ .�--,. _._ _ _...,...__ .---. � ' C°'1 , . ,s .. ___._ _ � _� ,. �, .,' .� � .� i � :. � _� SP #7II 13 � y •.__...._ t.i. . ,�. � �._, � � "'_' – __._.___–� .. ..._ ._ •1 - •�x � 5 i t , • .. Steven Hanson, Dla/'A�I ! T � � U i�'� r% �� Y =�t • � , •, Minnesota Petroleum Service •. ,,, f'--- I-" J • r � �333 .Urri versi Cy Rvenue N. E. : i��,� . I J . ;� :. . . � . _ , .. ld�� ` ..� . J.� � o �:/ /f �1 b • •� ~ . . i . . . � .. .. �'.e. � { � �w I . . 1 . • 4 wr�+ � . �.._...�. ; �.. Y ' �; � :�r, �� ..i.. ; ii��:i,,,yyy', .`.�"''j'-�.sr:V..,.,.r,.-YY.....,...-7-,v,-F.:. .,. �� ti 1' , � >'/li� +I ',:a' �t `�:�„�`i , `� 1 1 � \ / �I �1�• 4i ": V r.�a �rl �{(� .,b y . ' `� . �' �� :^ . . : ' /—, _ .-. ..� :�`:� :r` ��_ � •." 1 . I i � _y...� ' � �� 4 � .'t1� � I p, R .f ,; � . , . . , ,.,iz•� t� _�_'�'�__ �I� �i. � t ' �: � ; � ' : - -�� ' -" I : �' '� ` i . , : .• ;;; t1r�,. . ' r ''� ` ti.�;:tC �' ' � i' �,.,. • ... .e*.�A+ ._.....a_._...-�!., ._.._ t . ��. , i�� y � .,C.�.w...__... . j.." �.�,. . , �; � , : �i ^ : lr � T ��' i �1 y � .� �,, ��,�� . � ,,,;, .� •, ,,� , : � . . : , . �,� � . , ~t' p ' \`.\'` •'. . � �/!/.� _ _ . ' � . ' �23:� �� Gt�� t�� >> 11 �� i, r`. �: \,J � i `�'L :3��1.��i� 110 ., t�i. ' � � q, �I�� i t,` , '',G; 1t4; � . • � . r`�n^ � .44 i.1�� lI� C �� y ' �Itj � . \ ? . � �: V 4 'al ' ..{ � � ! ' _ �. � � , . �'� � ` » � _�_�._� � ( a � . u . ' y _ _ � iJ 4 y ...... ;� . /.� . '�. :j . , �,� � ,� . ,� �a . .. ' n -: e r�l�l�1v �]+'.r''1 I ._... _.........�.....:!' � _. �:,� ' , - � _, �'�. � ' �� 1:'._.__... `4: = �,1 :,� i ,�� ,.:. �:�, .�. _ '�:��` � �— s��: '1°; 3. �a�,'�1:� _ � '� ,.�_i �J' � . ~ i .�.^ � y y� � . : � ' - ! . �'� \� .�.��-,b'1 �' (i� .v ,�` r�QO . 'Lj Y:��r�. �'1 -r � � .Si !4 �i ��.. ` ,.. ' . � . i � � � .�r.-r� r 5 .i .� � �i. ± , I � � I . ,Y; \} .� R � ti . �.1 [�` h � �` : �v. :.�.�-� ✓. i � t � { : � i -�......_.�. -j1 . 4 �l: \j �A �.. !� �. . ' �� I �5 S � � � `' j{ .�7 l ..._..�� i i ' , ` � . f .. �.� ` 4 W l � . �.-.... J 'i .) � � f '� �� _ � .J : :e � »v 5 i; ��..q . , �� s. ♦ � . � � I7 . � - 1i�:�� _. � � � r. .:.� �;3 ` ` ,�' �?� ,. l?'_..._ �3Sp- i :�,:7"1 I i`-4�{� �''t°; . — i � \ � � Z6 . ' "'_ .._.'"'...'� � •� i .,7 � . i . , � S ; � �j � ..�` �.. ...., "` _�_ , ,=Y� aS� �'� �-N � `; � �. :f . �. '{ ?,�j �.' � i �a��,�a,�i� �a,�! �� "'-�f F. � �� jf . � '. i' i , F, , • �..' }' � l \ 1 1 !` ;5,1. f: :.);; ,.�_,�i + l;i-, . �,'sY �� • � t ��- M ` lS.l •' r. SJ�.(~. , ± .. .t f y � � ,:•. . .` � 5� ..��, 4�� ! F �-- �,.� s333 ___.l �, :, , �`' �, J e, ,,, ' i !! ::'��r� � ., _►� � � ; �, � � � `_:. ��; , i ,, �' <. � _ � �' � . U) �` �.� ,; a. . �.�U �.':i.13 � ,+; 1 � , �,4 �`�� /:_. • '' `.1(� � �'K, ` '.,,�,1 '�, �., �.i ;� ...1...� _:�:.:^ ......... ..._ .:._' l ' ': . .�..i � ---�-`., P'�. : w �' :.�.: ~ y.L�` i : '!C .�..�..�. _.�...�� .. w..��.�.n......r..�..n f�i ..✓.�� ...''S �. � ` �r1 � ,i u.E .- •, ' ,•`• I I�.��.� ��.�� ^� � `l• v Y I:,�� I I ., . ��: ,,,,; i ,. � �� . �� !• 'a n �' � � � ' \�� I � y i: � C ,; • ' I -�--�> r�-•—._..� ��__ � ,'. � ., }.i. � > > �� / � �r ' .,_..i ��_ � ; .� �..� y ^�. ;�- ) ... . . J d � � ( . . . � C � .. l ( � ; —_-� •t, 33r.� . I I , ., v �'. i. __._� _ _..1 , _. r�Y �; ( ��-�:�� ; � � � : ; > � �� '�� ..� ' , ._(�`%,^�,1� ��_._._+\tl _....�1, J.:.� ._,.....` , t:. ..,.,..;:� w..� _ .:s _ i �. _...�_....�..�..._----_•--__�_..--_�-._...I.y'.1�.M�y._.. ��. �� 1�� C� 1 �! � , I ........... ...... ..,..�.,--.u.....�.__ _. �-__...... ,........ . � , '1 . hS..i. . , ,: . , � � • � � .AnnLicctnL'u Ilu:ne nrr�acnra�r: �JAdi- C A tJ n.�V�c n �rt ENT c eR�! ADDIIESSc S5�3C <'f� s% li��' �`r�r%�r , SS-�-` 3/ i Strcet City 'Lip Code TPLEPFIO*IP �F �+� 0 - a S' � �! F3ome 7susiner�d PR�P�IiTY 041NLT�(S�M N.,_ /,,, L. h,,;� ADDRESS(ES ,f , — - - ty Lvt :i�lit �(��- 05 llate i'iled: b'ee:Si.SC�`�Receipt �f9 OI�-, Council dcticn:llate RI'c;bItKS: Caie .2 S/ S :Ia.Rsc �/'';�a �. ff n/•� /"ln/S J-s1` � 7 Street City .' Zip Code TELEPIiON� �� 5�__� j�,�_S Y 3 S _. r��'� S`2 `� Home I3usiness 13operty Location on Street or Exact Street Addxess (IF AIv'X� Sou�� e� r1.3o .i��i S7. NC. F� . � - ,.�,�.,.:.��.,,�,�x��..�.�„��,�..�..�_„ Legal Description o£ Yroperty: s 9m ;� 7`e FL.L._.— � i ��e '� / n �%e c 11 o n yr _r e. i��¢'_,,,* �� % r.�i /��'i. !� Sor Lot 7� ,../� Y'lo e a � e a �'�o n, t�i e ,S e.��_�SLL�_cZ � /� (•. 7 c � --- ..2L�GL�� o'l , ^Fqr ��ip �h�.r.�c� .oT._�?'�..�.✓� n _� ��Z e ! 1' (. U� � �� Q�„�,c�..ir �,f„n.�.c r,�, 4� P �, c'� „�c f,�%.°?d.��e / c�.a. of Property__�� •£t. � Prc>sent Got�:iT7,; C±zssi;'� ceY� oi.�/'Lj_� The undersi�ned h�reUy decl�se� thai; all the facts and xepresentations siated in this application e;re true ar.d ' correct. DATE: ) � � 7 ,�-� SIGNATIIRE 7 , . .` �` �1�.��_l BL'I,Oid POR CI4'1 nSE ONLY {S�b reverse side for s3ditional insi:ructzor.c �., — - GHL'Cf:lD SY 51'�'�'i' DATE '°___...�_-._�.�..,�...,.r,�,�.__��,_o.,.,. itemarl�� PLANNING COTIDtISSION: Date of Considexation - RemarYs: CITY COUNCIL: Date of Considerntion - Remarks• �� • i 0 .s.� .. . -= A • ..i: k � '..�.c" . . . . � � � . . ..�, *...FI ..r.tC�.�:�� 6�L1f��'C� �"�o�3VE�;`��3aG. 11'tl�:. aoos.�errr.ra.ora:,*. ri F. coiunso�n u�:io�rrs+>sa2� �ae-��ea � 1 M61i=�Y C6'ATI�Y TMAY THIO EU1�V6Y, PLAN. OA RStORT WM /A[�AI�[O OY M6 OR ltNO[Q MY pIRCCT BV'[RV(6lOH 11ND YHAT � AN A C11L'r RCO�OTQR20 LAHD CU19V6Y01 UNP[R TN[ f.AWJ 0I TK[ 9TAT6 O► �NNNQIIOTA. �� ,,--�� -r'� �\-221� ), � 4 DA7F � �1 // !. , r;��• A.<. `,�, ..�—A". , 1� SCALE i"— �O t1lHMc�07t�`i2-" ,f`,3TFiA f1CSi� N�. 5332 9=1i�ON MOhdUMENT � r,,, ��,� _ F_u.v.g� �or.l , i _ .. �. ,.. -�� I'�-� �id' 1i'fA'SVT' i C�rv. .. ,,i! " �Nl G_I_f=�J.'£S�ib.(oCc� � ' F� � . _ +� Z�� i ,j - �� C+.' � � � . . . . ._ `i bo:g'� �rai.p', . . � '-. . �b�4; �. . U"��,� ,. 7 : 'i 7 � � � 0 Q 0n V i Q 3 \u PP t �tSK 1n1 D.T. ` c�a.t�Ac�E N - +-. zv _ � � 5-O r5x; 30 9 1-5- F . r_ ,n—..____ ;b8.3; ' . ti�.l t 5"r FLTi. �'g� 25.5 ��.-..rr..- si�0it , � : �-; , �o � M � � � � I�PP�.0 n1 � '_' �_3i ��8;� ` �C40Ti�C POLre �" o�a uNa : )3G, < `N3�Y ;:. — � `. b i3ANK p 2 W ` � (bl.fa� LL - �i8.2...- - . � -- ;66_2 ;" � Lnts 4,5, 6& 7, [31aci: 11 Hamilton's Addition to t1echanicsville %lnoka County, Minnesota J � J m �tS.Sr �� D W g a � �✓ ( ' i u Ez. 1 ' ' ^ U� s �-1 :� � � . �(d?Qi . � ' � `.I i . . . �� .�q. 30� �� i NOTE: �'H`S.raUR�ll�('. MP4C .FFCOhl SE4'C10N : aracp.4cro�.•«t taivc� APPUCA�'�a�a o� �� I t3��s��.TT - �cc�k�ras � rzuL��. .__ .... _.....I , �.. ��. z.. � C'C, -� � . .. , �s.. 'f,�. s�i . \:.-.�, „F ,,.. .: S .. .. 1C.;T#wr'Y�,i�,%Mi'K'6�A}�!?�IIi�T..��. 'nw�4'�.1. ��"S.,.FyX�r ... .,. � j� . . . �� , . � . .... .: . ° f ` . u... . u .. ..�.4 �\� v �n 1 �'__nI ♦ "''�.. �K ` •. r�. ... f ' �- .. . . . _ .. . . � . �. ..,u a � . . .. _ .h�] �- , w � . � � �,�"; � � �� ' _� ;r . , z . �,. , __ _---- Y -- - _ ..__ , . � .:. , , �� . , . . J "'.._.�. . • _ • � Y �' � ! .. r � a�,�� «. . '._�_�_..,, _>,�_ _ ; , ....�_ , _. . =� . T - ----- — -- — a - _. { _. _. . ...__. __ . ,. � � r . .�__.:✓ . _ . ; --�—� _ - ---__ �VnY i� , a ` , : _ , • � z - � .,. , ! _ _. V ' , . . . '�.�� ,. . : .. �; .� � : _ .:. _ . ., . . . : �� . t 0 I � �-'_1'.,�-,� ,- - u ..in� .. .. ;{ 7 . I ' . Y.J,� !� �. n . . . . � �. ;�� g4S5 b � JO i . � �� ° �' ��s ,, ,� � 54' : ; � '�, �ass ` � �� '` : ; . " . ; ,= - .-sa3�, ' SdSI �'" �, <; � ,4 , w . - 54�_ �' �Y �,�- u i > - ��• � , • °'+�a Q —_. ; — r �J jA i' �- � ��' S430 '� z4 �,_ �� Q ^ _ �� 4 � �d�26 �� :z _ , , 5 , ��`? cs' z' � � � - , ��!l Z 5 4 Z 0 ��," + " ., 'i' zo �� c� ., � °� 3 i/ 5.:, � y � a j . �9 �� . _ . 5�i00` �-.'544`% 54,10 , i• , ie "'1 _ -- . ' S' � , ; io , G51' S3 � `'. I . : �� ; ��'�� 5qot s4flo � -t :� � ;E._ � � , �� _ .,3a , ; . . : : , Pa � ` r „� � ; � . � ��t TS-0. A�lE. — s , u .,.._. � . � ,. . . . . t--�1 ,,. � , , z: � ' (n `. 5s90 53�7 53_.=� ` i 53�,1� 5��0 ��38! ( . � � � , �: �' � � ' { .+� + a o ' � �° � � 4� � �F � . � ,\�.�, ,�? I �� . 5370 Cl' S33� 5310 �� l, 537i 5'�"il �' I � � z� 1 '�� .<.� , Qr' _ 5��p• 53�7 5350 53�'.Y' ; z k� . � , (� �'4 `.� ,z 1— Z z` —•34 �_ � 5 3.�a 5's 5! � 1 -< < � s � -s _ �za 53.36 5331 . <f i -f ' ' .. .p �` V� Z4 _7'. ��,J . Y�� I ,.,; .� . � ?' - a � � ��- ;, r „ . . �, =�T ` � {..: ! �� <:. /x.�,. �� 53Z.9 d' �� ' . ,�,, �a�,1' � �3:t(, S3i3 . ��.� .. 53�6 �1—j�� ' r ' ;4 t-- � 33 � �, ��. T ., ,:; .,�3i 41._ . ��, ;.; a : � s�zo S3`.i� �, �3�� I � � �. >.it� l f"' ` --- 5j3o 5.� J3 �1 . � .. � .. : Cn �s ^ 53! 1 . _ `-,.a �z F�_. , w. ,...I+ „�� _ I.a - 5310 531rO JJ��a .:t ..;' , 5311 �� ,�� ' S.siS 5.,Q5 6 , is � �; .,.�..� . ��,.� C-� •��`. 53�0 . �'s`�1 ..5�00 401 ; �c � . 11 . . � �, a� . RD._ I �' ` � � � -�;�,'-�--1'—"_ _ , -,, � ; :=- ..___ _---.�-� , `Y ., � � ; �,.,• � � � � � � � . ; � � : _ , , ; r � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMNIISSIQN MEETING NOVEMBER 14, 1978 MEMBERS PRESENT: LeRoy Oquist, Connie Modig, A1 Gabel, Kenneth Vos, Sharon Gustafson 1ffi�ffiERS ABSENT: None CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Oquist called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. Mx. Oquist welcomed Ms. Gustafson to the Commission and introduced her to the other Commission members. APPROVAL OF QCTOBSR 11 1978 C�AfONITY DSVEL9PMENT CONINffSSION MINUTES:. MOTION by A1 Gabel, seconded by Kenneth Vos, to approve the October 11, 1978, Coa�unit-y Development Co�ission minutes as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperaon Oquist declared the motion carried unanimousl.y. FINAL RECOt4hII?NDATIONS ON PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTE& 205. ZONING: Mc, Oquist stated he felt the best way to do this was to continue going through the document page by page and making changes and/or recommendations as they went along. Hs. Modig commented that in reading the minutes of one of the Planning Co�ission meetings, Mr. Boardman had stated that the commissioners did not have to refer back and forth between the old Zoning Ordinance and the Proposed Changes to the Zoning Ordinance as it was a11 included in the latter document. Ms. Modig staCed that it was the Covanission's experience from their last meeting that this was not always true. The Commissioners concurred with the following recommended changes: 205.04 GENERAL PROVISIONS 205.041 Declaration of Policy Page 10, �4. Mr. Vos stated Item 4 did not seem like a"declaration of policy". Recommeadation t o delete �4. J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COt�t[SSION MEBTING NOVEMBER 14 1978 - PAGE 2 Z05.043 Non-Confoiming Uses and Structurea Page 10, �1:��Reminder by Coa�isaion to put in section number. Page 11, #12. Coum+ent by Mr. Vos: "Did that get rid of all junk yards if not in right zone?" 205.044 Lot Provisions Page 12, #4. Delete "thoroughfare plan" in second line and insert "Transportation Plan° 205.046 Required Yard and Open Space Page 14, �3-C. Mr. Oquist stated that according to this require- ment, no one could build a deck larger than 10 feet, and steps would have to be 2 feet from the driveway. It seemed like an umreasonable depth. This item should be clarified, 205,047 Automobile Parking Page 16, �k3, Is word "lited" in second line supposed to be "listed"Y Page 16, �3-D, Apartment Hotel. "Apartment Hotel" was not defined in.definitions. Should be defined. Page 16, �3-F. The words "for each" should be inserted after "one (1) parking space" in second line. Page 16, #3-H. Five parking spaces for each alley in Bosaling Alley seemed rather high compared to the amount of parking spaces allowed for Church, Clubs (�3-I). Page 17, �3-0 and �3-P. Mr. Vos cou�ented on the difference between the parking apaces for a medical or dentaZ clinic and the parking spaces allowed for a public building. He felt public bu3ldings needed more space than a medical clinic. Reca�endation that Offices, $anks, Municipal Bui2ding and/or Public Office Buildings (P) have a more equitable amount of parking spaces, such as 150 sq, ft. which was the same as the Medical or Dental Clinic (0). Page 18, #4-I, J, K. Mr. Oquist stated that the "zoning administrator" was referred to on this page. Mr. Oquist referred to page 24, 205.051 Zoning Administratar. He stated there was a definite need for a table of contents or an index so things such as the Zoning Administrator's description could be found in this document. COlAfI7NITY DEVEL4PMENT COM[4ISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 14, 1978 - PAGE 3 205,048 Performance Standards Page 20, #2-A (Refuse). Mx. Vos stated that caaipost piles or leaves ahould not be put in closed containers. This statement seemed somewhat restrictive for R1 and R2, but was needed for the other zoning dlstricts. . Page 20, #3-B-2 (Screening). Mr. Vos stated that people were being told what kind and size of trees should he plattted. This atatement _ was too restrictive and should be re-examined. Page 21, �3-B-3. Mr. Vos stated that this statement again seemed too restrictive. If the statement meant that screening fences should be maintained, thea the wording should be more clear. Page 22, �4-C. Sentence was incomplete. Should read: "The City Engineer may specify a minimum finished ground grade for aay structure in order to allow proper connection to city utilities. (Underlined portion taken from Section 205.061, 1-D, page 205-11 of old Zoning Ordinance.) . Page 23, �6-C (Maintenance). Did this requirement regarding snow and ice removal from private steps and walkways belong in the Zoning OrdinanceY Page 23-A, �8-D (Enviro�ental). Should be underlined to conform with the other additions in the ordinance. Page 23-C, �8-1 (Erosion). The word "his" should be deleted and"the" inserted in the fourth line. 205.05 ADMINISTRATION & ENFORCEMENT 205.052 Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Page 25, first paragraph, changed to read: "The Council, by majority vote of the entire Council, shall adopb amendments to this ordinance as required. Page 25, �1. Delete "his" and insert "the" in last line. 205.053 Special Use.Pezmit Page 26, �2. What "Co�ission" was being referred to in first seatence? If it was Planning Co�iasion, 1t should be so stated. 205.054 Variances Page 27; �2-A. The words, "himself" and "h1s" should be deleted. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COPII4iSSI0N MEETING NOVEMBER 14 1978 - PAGE 4 205.06 DISTRICT PAOViSIONS 205.06L Establishment of Districts Page 31. The Covmission questioned whether there was still a "PD District" as lieted. Page 31. Ixt first sentence at the.top of the page, the word "sixteen" should be deleted. 205.07 R-1 DISTRIGT REGULATIONS 205.071 Uses Permitted Page 33, �3-E. The word "is" should be changed to "to" in second line. 205.073 Lot Requirements and Setbacks Page 33, $1 Lot Area. Recommend 9,000 sq. ft. be changed.to�7,500 sq. ft. �kl-B should then be deleted. Page 34, $2 Lot Width. Reco�end 75 feet be changed to 60 feet. �2-A should then be deleted. Page 34, �2-C. Recommend 75 feet be changed to 60 feet. Mr. Vos ' stated it should be considered what implications the changes in lot requirements would have on the setback requirements for side yard. 205.075 Parking Requirements Page 35, 1-C (General Provisions). The Coum�issioners questioned what "other approved hard surface material" would be other than blacktop or concrete already mentioned in the sentence. 205.08 R-2 DISTRICT REGULATIONS 205.081 Uses Permitted Page 36, #3-C. "R-1 District" should be changed to "R-Z District". 205.082 Lot Requirements and Setbacks Page 39, �D-1 (at top of page). "R-1 District" in first paragraph should be changed to "R-2 District". 205.084 Building Requirements Page 36, �2 Minimum Floor Area. The Conmission felt there should be s«ne guideline for floor area requirements. Possibly a standard per the "Advisory Standards for Land Use Regulation". _ _ _ _ _ _.. , . ___ �s� COMMUN7TY DEVELQPMENT CO2�4ffSSI0N MEETI2iG NO�MSER 14 1978 - PAGB 5 205.09 &-3 DISTRTCT REGULATIONS 205.091 Uses Permitted Page 41, F-6. The Commission questioned why the maximum height for hi-rise agartmeats was seven stories. Elsewhere in the ordinance, a maximum of six stories was mentioned. (Example: page 42, 205.094 Building Requirements, #1) 205.10 R-4 DISTRICT &EGULATIONS 205.101 Uses Permitted Page 44, �2-C (middle of page, Uses Permitted with a Special Use Permit). The Commission questioned what this statement was trying to address regarding automobile parking lots for off-street parking spaces. 205.103 Lot Requirements and Setbacks Page 45, �1-A Lot Areas. The Co�ission questioned 4,000 sq. ft. Should possibly be changed to 3,000 sq, ft. Page 45, �2-A Lot Coverage. The Commission felt that '+3CP! of total area used for the mobile home shall be covered by all units and accessory structures" left a,lot of open land. Page 45, #3-A Setback. The setback of 35 feet from the street and 15 feet from any other property line was not reasonable with the average size of a trailer. 205.104 Parking Requirements Page 45, #i-A Stall Provisions. The Commission questioned why two 10 x 20 ft. hard surface parking spaces when a single family dwelling only needed one parking space. Mr. Vos stated the vhole section on 205.10 DISTRICT REGULATIONS was not underlined as new additions, but did not match the old Zoning Ordinance. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Connie Modig, seconded by A1 Gabel, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Oquist declared the November 14, 1978, Coumiunity Development Commission meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. � 8espectfully submitted, � �; � /�� -�-f Lyn-y a� Saba &ecording Secretary _'�� _ - ., ENEBGY PROJECT COPAIITTEE MESTING AOVEt�IDER 15, 1978 MEMBERS PRESENT: RichaYd Harris, William Whartan, Dennis Anderson, Dean Saba, Donald Wall, Giles McConville, Betty Enkhaus, James Langenfeld • MEMBERS ABSENT: Chester Potasek OTf�RS PRESENT: Bill Davis, Minnesota State Energy Agency,(Phone #296-1732) Jim Hedron, School District #14 CALL TO ORDER: Temporary ChairpeYSOn Harris called the meeting to ordez at 7:45 p.m. APPROVAL OF N01/EPffiER 1 1978 ENERGY PRQTECT COMMITTEE MINUTES: The following amendments were made to the minutes: Page 2, third paragraph from bottom of page, "Chairperson Langenfeld should be changed to "Chairperson Harris". Page 5, paragraph 7, the word "consumption" should 6e changed to "conservation". MUTIOZI by James Langenfeld, seconded by Betty Ettkhaus, to approve the November 1, 1978, Snergy Project Co�ittee minutes as amended. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Harris declared the motion catried unanimously. 1. INTRODUCTION OF BILL DAVIS, STATE ENERGY AGENCY: Mr. Davis stated he was the Metropolitan Energy Coordinator responsible for working with comnunities in the seven-county area. He primarily served as liaison between energy co�ittees such as this one and the S[ate Energy Agency, providing the co�ittees with information and " literature the Agency had available and also taking requests back to the Qgeacy from the comnittees. ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING, NOVEMBER 15 19�8 - PAGE 2 Mr. Davis stated he worked out oE the Local Services Division of the Conservation Department of the Energy Agency, and they were responsible for organizing local cou�unities at the local level to establish cammittees in the awareness of energy to act in an advisory capacity to the City Councils on energy-related activities and to provide education, information, and literature to the residents at large. 2Ir. Davis stated that at the present time, there were three state mandates oa the books which directly affected the cou�unity; 1. Building Energy Code--a requirement that all newly constructed facilities comply with energy standards as of 1976 2. Auditing Mandate--a11 public buildings should be audited in local governments. The first half to be done by 1979 and the balance by 1980. 3. Lighting Efficiency Standard--local units of government were asked to comply with this standard. Mr. Dayis stated there were also so�me federal mandates which affected the schools and hospitals which required them to perform energy audits. Mr. Harris explained to Mr. Davis the charge of the Energy Project Co�ittee, that the Planning Commission with direction from the City Council had set up the Energy Project Coum�ittee to help the Planning Commission develop an Energy Policy for the City of Fridley, some dizection towards possible changes in the 2oning Code, and that type ot thing. Hr. Davis stated that was probably the best route for the Committee to proceed. He stated that the State Energy Agency was using the City o£ Pridley's Energy Project Couemittee's charge as an example for other co�unities and had been sending it out as a recommendation for other co�unities in setting up energy c�ittees. The Agency did stress that each community develop a policy, some type of guideline or framework, by which the cfty could begin to direct its efforts in the future. If they could begin to do an inventory of where the energy users were and where the energy supplies and demands were in the co�unity, then in the event of an emergency, the city could act accordingly and appropriately. Minneapolis snd St. Claud had completed their "Energy Policy Statements" and Moorhead vas in the final draft of its energy policy statement. Mr. Davis stated that he had brought aZong a 15-minute slide presentation, uthich was their bi-annual report, an 18-year projection of the supply and demand situation in the State of Minnesota. This data had been cw�piled and submitted to the Legislators and the Governor for them to go over. Mr. Davis thought it was a good overview of what the energy situaLion was in the State of Minnesota. Many people still did not truly believe thete was an energy crisis. Minaesota was at the end of the pipe- line. Minnesota imported approximately 987, of all its fuel, so Minnesota - was very, very vulnerable. Minnesota had severe wintezs and it was very important that people get a handle on the eaergy situation and understand it. _, _ _.._ __ .� BNSgGY PItQ7ECT COrII4ITTE6 MEETING NOVH�IDBR 15 1978 - PAGE 3 Mr. Davis atated this bi-annual report was made available to all the citiea. At th3s time, there were no additional copies and it was being reprinted. As soon as more copies were made available, they could get them out to the conmuniCies. tfr, ilall asked if the SCate knew the energy demand county by county? � itr. Davis stated they did have a member on their staff who handled the energy usage county by county, so they could find out the approximate energy usage for Anoka County. They also monitored the gasoline and petroleum supplies that came into the state. , llr. Saba asked if there was any way the cities could monitor their own usage? Mr. Davis stated that technical expertise was needed to do that. The c3ties were being asked to monitor their individually owned buildings through the audits. As far as private businesses were concerned, there was ao way the State could intervene and require them to do things. Fortunately, the private sector tended to be motivated by profit and savings so they tended to self-regulate on their own. NSP and 3M had made remarkable r.eductions in energy usage by housekeeping types of chores to curtail consumption. When people looked at their utility bills, they had to be trained not to focus on how much money they were saving, but to see what their consumption was, one year versus another year. Hr. Saba asked what kind of auditing was being done in state institutions such as the t3niversity of Minnesota? 14r. Davis stated that these audits were in three phases. The first phase was a walk-through audit observing energy usage in the building and asking questions on a survey form. The second phase was a mini-audit which was handled by a more professional, technically inclined individual to carry out inspection of the boiler system and the interior/exterior framework. The third phase was the maxi-audit contracted out with ca�sultants to assess the overall energy consumption in the building. What these three phases did was give the State Energy Agency an inventory of tbe energy nsage in various buildings acxoss the state and this was also included in the Presideat's Energy Package, of which they had just teceived copias. It basically outlined the auditing aspect and [hat [here would be some fuads available for performing these audits. Mr. Davis stated that regarding the energy policy statements, they were encouraging co�unities to start looking at the vehicle usage in city government converting frw� full-size to mid-size. There was a savings realized of between $450-700 per vehicle per year as a result. A number of communities had gone to mid-size, including the State. They also [alked to the co�unities about the large street vehicles--when purchasing new ones, the city should consider deisel power as an alternative. They talked about synchronizing the street lights for smooth traffic flow, reconsideration of "stop on red" lights; also, employee practices aud habits by turning off typewriters and lights. Bt�RGY PR0.JECT CONAIITTEE MEETING NOVSMBER 15 19�8 PAGE 4 Mr. Harris asked how the State Energy Agency interacted with the State Building and Energy Codea? Mr. Davis stated the State Energy Agency wotked jointly with them in terms of designing regulations, and they worked as cottsultants to local municipalities answering specific questions relating to the energy code or building code in general. As far as enforcement, the enforcement mechaaism for the Building 6� Eaergy Code originally was to take place in July 1, 1978. It was given a six-month extension to January 1, 1979, for the remainder of the state. Enforcement of the building codes was pretty much done in the local areas by a building inspector. The problem was that the building inspector was not trained to be able to identify energy requirements in building permits. Part of the reason for the ' extension was to give building inspectors the opportunity to receive training. There was a lot of resistance in enforcing, and the State Energy Agency had no enforcement mechanism. l�fr. Harris asked how the State Energy Agency interacted with other state agencies, such as MnDOT, as far as energy conservation2 Mr. Davis stated that the State Energy Agency interacted wi.th MnDOT, the Department of Agriculture, and a number of other agencies, by woricing in a very conciliatory and cooperative atmosphere, In the case of MnDOT, the Agency was looking at their long term planning, procurement practices, purchase of vehicles (full-size to mid-size), and mass transit situation (trying to discourage personal vehicle usage and encourage mass transit usage). They tried to point out the positive aspects and hoped for the best. The Agency was still in an "agency" status and did not have any authority or power. Mr. Wharton stated that the fact that there was a State Energy Agency promoted the use of that agency by the other state agencies. Mr. Davis stated that beginning Friday, November 17, through Tuesday, November 21, was the secaid annual Energy Saver Show at the Minneapolis Auditorium. Mr. Harris asked if the State Energy Agency took any positions with the Public Service Co�ission as far as proposals made by the utility companies? He felt some of these groposals were going to be counter-productive to any energy conservation. Mr. Davis stated that if they did, it was very little. The thing the State Energy Agency was involved in was issuing certificates of need. When a utility comgany came in aad requested, for example, an additianal power plant, the company had to get a certificate of need. This gave the Agency an opportunity to check its data with the utility company's data to see if the demand was really there and if there were any other resources available. Primarily, those types of things wen[ directly to the Public Service Commission as the regulatory body. BNERGY PROJECT CONAtITTEE MEETING NOVEI+�ER 15 1978 - PAGE 5 Mr. Harris asked if Mr. Davis thought it would be of value for the cities or the League of Muaicipalities to Cake a atand on some of the utility companiea' proposals? Mr. Davis stated that they had a contract with both the League of Cities and the Association of Counties to hire an energy specialist to work in aa advisory capacity with municipalities, and that might be the vehicle for these Yypes of concerns. If there was a problem or concern, it should definitely be voiced by someone. Mr.,Harris stated that he was talking about the charging of a minimum rate plus being penalized for using alternative auargy sources as a back- up in additioq to gas or electricity. He felt that was not good and was counter-productive as far as energy conservation. Hr. Davis stated that was an important issue and a concern of theirs, also. Mr. Harris stated that the credibility of the energy suppliers had not been good. A few years ago when the energy crunch came on, the oil campanies said they needed to raise rates to build more pipeline, etc. Then, all of a sudden Mobil Oil bought Montgomery Ward instead of buying new pipelines and new facilities. Mr. Davis stated that the utility companies had more or less said there was not enough incentive for them to go out and explore new finds, so as a result, they bought other companies and new franchises. Mr. Davis stated what we were really talking about right now was an economic crisis. There were an awful lot of areas that needed to be addressed. The first step was in getting groups such as this togeCher, getting people educated, and try to get some concrete inforc�ation to the public. In his traveling around the state, people used to say to him, "Is thexe really an energy crisis?" Now Yhey were saying, "What can we do about it?" It was a good feeling to know that people were now taking positive steps in the right direction. Mr. McConville asked that when a local group noticed something happening, primarily in terms of utilities doing what they could to crush conservation techniques, was there some sort of natural pipeline to the state group, who in turn could go to the proper agency? Mr. Davis stated that this group and other groups like this were that pipeline. The State Energy Agency's role was to keep the Energy Project C�ittee notified of a�eeting dates, provide technical information and expertise so the co�ittee was not misguided. The co�ittee's strategy and approach on addressing issues was up to the coamittee. Mr. Wall sta[ed that Fridley was located almost in the shadow of a power plant. He asked about district heating and how far did district heating extend2 ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTE$ MEETING NOVI;MBER 15 1978 PAGE 6 Mr. Davis stated that the most efficient usage of district heating would trave! between 35-40 miles, so it was feasible for Fridley. District heating was taking Che waste heat from power plants, heating up water, and sending it through pipes to be used on the other end. About 27 co�unities throughout Minnesota already had district heating. Unfor- tunately, a lot of co�unities had abandoned their projects and a number of conanunities had discontinued using district heating. Problems were that the technique used in the past was obsolete--rust and corrosion had taken place in the pipes. But, now new piping was now available. The Department of Energy was working very closely with the State of Minnesota in developing some district heating concepts in the Twin Cities and other communities so it may be something viable for Fridley. The Govern- ment was making money available for it. Mr. Wall stated that maybe the Camsittee should be touching base with the Departm�nt of Energy and have them include Fridley in their survey oY investigation. ' Mr. Davis stated he would get the Committee the information on the county fuel consumption. He would also get the model policies from the communities he had mentioned earlier. He stated that also what was done in some of the other communities was to hire a CETA employee or an intern from a local college or univexsity to do the inventory. The interns provided the labor and it was no cost to the Co�ittee. St. Cloud and Moorhead had done this. It was a source.for the Co�ittee to consider for help in formulating their energy plan. Asfar as the commercial buildings in the co�mmnnity, this was a matter of getting good information out by having information readily available. The 5tate Energy Agency had pamphlets and literature available to the coumiunities. They encouraged the cities to have info�atioa available in City Hall. Mr. Davis stated they had a contract with the Minnesota Retailer Federation for them to hire an energy coordinator or consultant to work with retailers around the state and to hold ZS workshops to teach, educate, and give information to retailexs on how to reduce energy demands. Mr. S�iall stated he thought it would be a good idea to form block inaulating parties. Wou1d it make sense to have this as a conmeunity project for organizations such as the Jaycees? Mr. Aarris stated that regarding insulation, he thought the state had a responsibility to its citizens. Ae thought it was time the federal government and the state government got on [he stick and did something about the insulation companies that had cornered the market, they played games with it, withheld products, anythiag they could to drive the price up, It was unfair marketing. Mr. bavis stated he agreed. In the Agency, they had compiled an insulation study of insulation products around the staCe and were looking at consumer _ frauds and things of that sort. The problem the Agency had was they did aot have the laboratory capabilities so they couldn't examine or analyze products on [he market. The thing they were looking at was truth in advertising. �+NERGY PRQTECT COI�QfI1TEE MEETING 'N(��R 15 1978 PAGE 7 Mr, Saba suggested that the Agencp 1� into using atate institutions such as the University of Minnesota �ich had excellent laboratories and atudents always looking for projects. l�tr. Saba suggested that maybe the citg could promote and have a status symbol for an"energy efficient h�e°. It would help the owner sell the home and would certainly be a plus ia bu�ing a home. Mr. Harris stated that the city seem�d to have a watering syndrome. The city spent a lot of energy pumping the vater from the wells, purifying the water, and then the city sold it to hameocmers to be thrown on the lawns. He thought the city itself vas going to have to do sane rethinking oa what it promoted. iir. Davis stated that maybe that s�xbject could be talked about when the co�ittee talked about sesource conservati�. Mr. Harris and the committee members ihanked Mr. Davis for coming to tbe meeting and for his valuable infoastion. 2. INTRODUCTION QF JIM HEDR�N FRO�i SC�ODI. DISTRICT �k14: Mr. Harris introduced Mr. Aedron to tdae Carmnittee members. Mr. Harris stated Chat the reason the co�ittee �ad called on District �14 was to see if the School District wanted ass� imput to the cammittee. The ca�ittee had been Eormed to look into wys to save energy in the community. Mr. Hedron stated that the School District would like to participate in Lhe cammittee whenever they could, as it could have some mutual benefits. He stated that very likely he wwld b� t�e participant. Mr. Hedron atated that they had c�pleted a couple o£ the audits, but were holding back on the rest, because ot the possibility of federal funding. 3Sr, Harris asked if the Energy Project C�mittee could possibly look at the interim audit when it was finished. lir. Hedron stated the interim audit had been sent to the state and that iufozmation was supposed to be put into a computer and compared to a model school building. They had not gotten any report back. MY. Harris stated that the reasa� he �ws asking was because he could see a dizect correlation between the genuai coustruction of a school building and a small or medium-sized manufacturing building. These people would not be able to affotd to do an audit, aix! this would give Chem an idea of where they were at and what they coarld do. Audits also might be beneffcial fn the Zoning Code. ENERGY PROJECT COMMLTTEE MEETING NOVEMBER 15 1978 PAGE 8 Mr. Wall stated that maybe they could make uae of CETA personnel to do neighborhood surveys and get an assessment of energy consumption. ifr. Harris etated that it was going to be hard to get manpower. He stated he would find out the eligibility of getting CETA people. ?Sr. Harris expressed the coumdttee's appreciation to Mr. Hedron for his input. 3. RECEIVE t�ffi�IO FROM EPIGINEERING DEPARTMENT RE INFRARED MAPS OF FRIDLEY; MOTION by James Langenfeld, seconded by Dean Saba, to receive the memo. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Harris declared � the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Harris stated that, as the Committee could see, the infra-red over- view of Fridley had not been done. Mr. Saba suggested that the Energy Project Committee put a column in the city newsletter, posslbly starting out by publfshing "energy facts". Mr. Wall suggested that the Co�ittee set up a typical house with a simp2e guideline on how much energy that home should be using to be energy efficient. Homeowners could compare their homes to that example. 4. NEXT MEETING DATE AND AGENDA: The next Energy Project Cammittee meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, December 13, 1978, at 7:30 p.m. The £ollowing agenda items were established for the December meeting: 1. Goals and tentative goals 2. Model energy policies--Moorhead, Minneapolis, & St. Cloud 3. Priorities 4. Slection of Chairperson AW OURNMENT • MOTION by Don Wall, seronded by Giles McConville, to adjourn the meeting. ; IIpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Aarris declared the November 15, 1978, Snergy Project Coo�ittee meeting adjoumed at 10:40 p.m 8espectfully su itted, L Saba '. Recordimg Secretary __..__ _.....�.,,m�.__,. . __ -� CITY OF FRIDLEY SPECIAL ME'ETING - APPEALS COh�IISSION, NOVEMBER 28, 1978 : v �;: n�� Chairvq�an Schnabel called the Nwember 28� 1978, �cial Meeting of the Appeals Cc�i.aeion to c�rder at 7:45 P.M. ROLL CALL: Membere Preeent: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Kemper, Ms. Gabel Members Absent: Mr. Barna� Mr. Plemel Qthers Present: Jerry Boardman I. PROPOSID CHANGES TO CHAPTER 205• ZOATING CODE: Ms. Schnabel informed the Co�iasioners that the Planning Commiss3on hsd suggested that the minutee reganling the changes io the Zoning Code from all the C�issions be consalidated before they reach the Planning Conmmission. Mr. Boardmsn stated that Staff had nat plenned to do that until after Planning had diacuesed the changes, because there vould be more changes from Planning. Ms. Schnabel stated that she had infoz'med the Pleanin� C�vnission that the Appeals C�issim rrented a deYinition oP "Family" and "Occupancy Limit" and that they had requested a legal opinion regarding these definitions. Ms. Schnabel stated that Planning Co�3seion had suggeste3 that they rreit oa getting a legal opinion and also suggested that they check into a Minneapolis ordinance regarding non-related people living in a dwelling. Ma. Schnabel stated that she had called Minneapolis City Ha� todqy, and they couldn't locate the ordinance, but voirl.d call Ms. Schnabel back to�rrw. Ms. Schnabel stated they could discuas thia at the next meeting after ehe obtained a copy.of the Minneepoiis ordinance. 205.048 �o�arrcE sr.anmaRns Page 23 - A-�$ - Environmental: A. Explosives: Ms. Schnabel stated that ehe vould like to have s�ething in this section regarding land alteration. i�h�. Boardman stated this section dealt an�y vith meterisls that could.decompose by explosion and Yelt that land elteration was a separate funetion. Mr. Boardman stated that they could store dynamite at a land alteration sitei but they s:ould aeed a licease to do that. t�. Boardman stated t6at there �as another section in the co3e `rhich desls vith land alteration. Mr. Kemper asked where all the specifications u�er Enviropmental came Yrom. 2�h�. Boaxdman atated that these specificatioas vere pars-phrased from ordinancea �'om New Brightea, Coon'Rapids, Fdina, and Brooklyn Center. Most of these vere ia the original Fridley Ordinance, but the rroxriing was changed. SPECIAL MEE'PING - APPEALS CONR�IISSION�NOVEbiBER 28� 1978 - PAGE 2 Page 23-C �`8 - Erosioa: _ Mr. Boaniman etated that in this section they xere concerned that nith construction there was a certain amount of run-off that could effect the adjacent property rnmer and nntil now they have not had ar�ything that controlled erosion of another pera�s' property. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Boardman if he mesnt that this would contain ar�}rthing regarding land alteratimn. Mr. Basrdman etated that Item No. 1 under Erosion atated that a property ocmer �.res required t0 prevent wind or vster erasion, and to that point it would. Mr. Boazdaan stated that there r+es a separate ordinance on land alteretion. Ms. Schnabel asked iY there ahould not be so�thing in the code referring to the land alterati.on ordinance. NIr. Boardman stated that when construction takes place� the person must get a permit, end the permit review would cover land elteration. Other inatances of land elteration, where there was not constractio�� would be covered in the land alteration ond3nance. Ms. Gabel atated thet she agreed with Ms. Schnabel �hat sc�e reference to the land alteration ordinance should be msde here. Mr. Boardman atated that land alteration really dces not app�y to the zaasing ordinance, an3 that ft vas s seperete ozdinance. Ms. Sek�nebel stated that it did 3a that it sras more atringent in reganle te vatenrqys than this �ppeared to be, and Felt they should be toizgh on development ia terms of usterways, such as ponding areas. Mr. fsoardman atated tk�at thoae things +,rere being takea into consideration oa page 23-D of the code. �5•�52 AMENDMENT TO THE ZOPtING ORLINANCE Page 25, lst paragraph: Change to resd: "The Council, from time to time� mQy adopt amendments to this ordinance." (Delete vords: "by majority vote of the entire Council°.) 205.054 SPECIAL USE PER2�IIT ISSUANCE Pege 27: Ms. Schnabel stated she wvld like the following statement in here: ^S�eoiel Use be reviewed periodical�y aud�or u�aa the sale of the busiaese to which it was granted°. Ms. Schnabel atated that thia wrould build ia some type �f control over the Speciel Use Permit. Mr. Boardman stated that that eould create a lot of extra paper work a�i probably wouldn't accomplish enough to make it worthwhile. Handling it on a complsint besis trould seem to wark better. � SPECIAL MEE`PI7+�, APPEAIS COA4�SSION, NOVEN�IIt 28. 19T8 PACE � Mr. Kemper seked if they could check on it ahen s piece of property changee haads. Mr. Boardman atated that they don�t knorr vhen property is sold� because they don't require buelneas licencee. Mr. Boerdman etated that the Special Use Permi,t gcea srith the business� not xith the pereon who rnms the buainess. 205.054 vaxzaxcEs Page 28, #4; .The Ca�isaionere agreed that the Yirst paragraph ehazld be changed to read: "In residential (R-1 Zoning) areas the Appeals Ca�vnission hae the authority to grant final approual. of variancee T�rhen all the following conditions are met: Page 28 #5: The Caaumiesioners agreed that the Section Number in the first para- graph should be changed. Page 28, #5-B: Ms. Schnabel atated that Hardships had not been noted ia recent Adminietrative Reports Yor variance requests and srou].d like thia to be required. Mr. Boardmsa stated he would look into this anci make sure it vould be dona in the Yuture� as it �rae alresc�y required. Page 29, Paragraph C: The Coarai.seioners agreed that this paragraph should be chnnged to read: "In recp�ending or approving a variance, subject to the conditions of Section 2�15.054 the Co�nniesien and or the Council mqY impoea coalitiaus to eneure campliance a� to protect adjacent properties." 205.055 BUILDIIVG PERM1�5 Ms. Gabel stated that vhen a Building Permit is issued� cauld there be s control as to when the building must 6e ccatpleted. Ms. Gabel meationsd one instance where comstruction had been going on� ia a residential aree� for a period of 12 yeara� on one b.ouse. Mr. Boaxdmsn stated that Building Permits are re-neweble� aud there were nat limitatisns on the time period necessaYy to c�nplete censtruction. Mr. Boax'dmsn stated he �rould check with Darrell Clark and also with the Stste Building Code to see vhet controls were poesible. Mr. Kemper stated thst the charges £or re-nexing a Building Permit should mqybe be I.00�CCd �.I1t.0. . . . . . . Page 29� #b: The Caumiissioners agreed that this should be changed to read: "In additioa to other regulations and requirements herein, no building or use ahalt be permitbed i.n any District nor sha11 existing land contotx or drain- age be al,tered xithout a building permit aad�or a 3.and alteration permit as provided in the City Code of Fridley. No such permit shell be issued Yor any bul3fling or use not in Conform3ty �tith applicable structural� saPety and sanita:y regul.ationa." �� 3PECIAL MEETING - APPEALS CON4�T53ION. NDVENBER 28s 1978 - PA(3E �F 205.071 R-1 DISTRICT REGULATIONS - USE8 PERMITJ'ED Page 32� #1-A: The Commisaioners agreed that thie.ehoul.d be changed to read: "Single-Pamily daellinge" rather than "Oae-fami�y dwellings". Page 32, #1-B: The Co�issionere agreed that the word "as" shovld be deleted. Page 33, E: The Ccam�issioners agreed that all of °E" should be deleted. Ma. GabeL etated that she: felt this was just a way to cirewnvent the zoning process� and aeemed to amount to spot-rezoning. 205•073 � xr�v�:r�rrrs arm sE�acxs - Page 3�+ -�A: The Coffinissicmers agreed that the def3nitian they had developed at the3r November 1� 19'j8 meeting ahould be added here. The definition was as Pollows: "In speci.al instances the Goni.xa� Adminis�rator mqy permit a setback of not leas than 30 feet provided that the new setback is within 5 feet of the Pront yard setbsck of sz�y adjacent structures." PeB� 35 - ir�: �e Co�issioners agreed that No. 1 and Na. 2 should be c�bined, and rear] as follows: "A rear yard with a depth of not lees than 25 percent oP the lot depth is required, with not Iess than 25 Peet permitted or more thsn 40 ieet required far the main building except that aceessory buildings may be bu.ilt not lesa ttian three (3) feet Prom a�}r rear lot 13ne not adjacent to a street" . �� _ _ -� � ..� � 20�.07�+ BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Page 35, �r1 - Height: The C�xaissioners agreed thst the words "from Pin3sh,d grade level" shoul.d be added at the �nd of this sentence. Page 35, �2 - Mini.mimm Floor Ares: Ms. Schnabel noted that btr. Nedegaerd� who had requested a varianee for a dwelling s� �C526 - 2nd Street� did not need e variance for iloor area because his lot was 40 feet and less than 9�000 sauare Peet and the requirement for a lot less than 9�Q00 square �eet wss 768 square feetr not 10� square feet. The Co�issioners agreed tbat the definition for Minimam Floor Ares siiould requlre that a lot that was 9�000 square feet or uwre must have 1020 square feet on the Yirst iloor includis� an at�ached garage� acd a lot that was Iess thst 9�� sqvare feet must have 768 squa�e Yee� on the firet fl.00r exelusive of attached garage or accessory buildings. The Coffinis�i�ners were also concerned about the terms "split- entry" snd "split-1eve1" and asked that Serry and StaFf srork srith this and develop same sui.table wording :for ttiis. 2oS.o75 Paaxuvc x�cnx�ri�r5 The Commissionera egreed that the heading °Garage Requiremeats" should be No. 1 �:nder Parking Requirements s,�ith the fallowing deYinition: " All lots having a minim�nn lot area of 9�000 square feet or more sha11 have a minim� of one (1) single sta11 garage. Then General Frovisioas xouZd become No. 2 under Parking Requ3remants. BpF.cIpL MEETII�, APPEAIS CONRdTSSION, NOVEMBER 28, 1978 - PAGE 5 Ms, Schnahei informed the Appeals C�ission tbat the Planning Caca�issian bad ieco�eaded thst Conncil tsble Mr. Nedegeard's sequest to build on a�FO Poot iot at �526 - 2nd 5treet N.E. for a period of 90 days (December� Tanuary' aad February). �balrwoman Schnabel declared the November 28� ly'(8 S�ecial Meeting of the Appeals Co�isslon adjourned st 10:45 P.M. " Y• i' 14 4811 �.�:��_�� Kat2�y S ton� Recording Secre�axq � October 25, 1978 Honorable Mayor and Member af the Counc+4 City of Fridley 6431 llnivenity Avenue t�1.E. Fridley� Minnesota 55432 Attention: Jerroid Boardman urbass p9an�aing • design �10 east hennepin ave�ue minne ,ota 55414 markst research minrieapdis (612)379-4600 Thank you for extending Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. the opportunity to submit the enclosed downtown redeveiopment study proposaf . 8ased upon our past er.perience and current staff capcbilities, it is ovr impression thot Midwest Planning and Research, lnc. is fuily qualified fo assist the City of Fridfey in fihis u�dertaking. Please note within the qualifications section of the proposal packet, that we have included a(ong iisting of commerciol area redev2lopment and market feasibility projects. As Midwest Planning and Research, '.nc. has had a long and successful history in the planning design and market research profession, we would encourage the City ta re��iew our qeraliTicat�ans �vitii �est clients. We will look fonvard ta an opportunity for an interview to discuss this proposal in greater detail. In 4ha meani'ime, should thare be questions, please contact myself or Jim Chrisiensen at 379-4600. Sincerely, MIDWEST PL4NIJING AND RESEARCH, INC. � ��_ r'��° �ephen T. Ryan Assisinnt Director of Pianning STRind EncRosuse �. t PURPOSE t�man �."arsnir�g � desr� 416 east hennc��in averx.m �sota 55414 PROPQSAL FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA DOWhlTOWN R�VI7ALIZATION STUDY 25 Oetot>er 1978 ir�arka4 research rcar'r�eapolis {612}379-4600 UQon request from the City of Fridl�y, this proposal has been developed for the overal) purpose of facilitatirx3 the City's objectives regarding downtown revitalization in the area of University Avenue N.E. and Mississippi Street. Upon completion of the first fhree phases of the req�ested work program, it is the intent and purpose of this prnposal fio provide a Yhorough ana�ysis of redevelopment opportunifiies, a plan to guide the physical redevefopment taslc.5r ana a description of priwte and public abligations necessary fo impiemenf the project pian. WORK PROGRAM/AP?RCaACH 1. Phase I: As indicated in the request for pruposal, Phase i is to culminate in a repast which �rovides a carra�rehensive "orefi{e" of 'she subiectr zites or.d 4heir influencing environment. The iniormaiion w�hich wouid comprise such a ret�ort is to be deveioped (some ai which ma}' ba currently availoble from t4e City) by both City sPaif and consuitant. $ince it is a primary ebiective of the Cifiy to determine the causes of commerciai faiiure and market stogr.a'rion; it is prep�ed tho# the Phase I in�lude a fharounh anatysis of i-he economic enviraciment rAiative fia t}�e suoiect sitas and provide a description of marketing iiab�liti�s/apportunities which sheuid be consid�red in attempting io redevelop (p;iwate or pui5lic) tbe existing commercial area. To adoreu this task specifically, we NrYaufd aropose to undertake o(cand uti(ir_otion and marke�obili'vy anaiysis (Lt1M) wnich invoives ihe foilav�i7g research and analysis: Identificat�nn of 9usin�:ss Po'entials A. Coordinater Review end $upplement City Planning $taff Inputs (1) Compiete Eonci use e%a4a (2) D�scripPian of 4he real esPate (3) Merchant probiern identiEication (4) SOC16°2CUR�Sf1iC CIIOi'tlC4Y'f151'1CS �� - , B. Survey '. (1) Comumer habits and preferences (2j local business operatioru j3) Competitive developments C. Delineate Trade Areas (1) Existing (2) Potential D. Quantitaiive and Qualitative Market Analysis (1) Retail Sales (2) Offiice ' (3) Housing (4) Public Facilities E. SuggesP Aiternative Combinations of Aharket Po�entiais for Physical and Fiscai Analysis The sfudy wi!! 62 underta�en wi;h an initia{ upda!'sng and expcnsion of our subregional and community orien3a'rion Phrough review of existing and new data and fieid inspectir.ns. An aralysis of space use and condition, in eddition to an invenPory and or :: �sis oY competitive and complimentary facilities will be assembfed and concce; �d in sur'rici�nt d:?tr�i) to ewluate impacf and develop service areas Por ihe y'> �ive uses. Fr 's information, tne curre�t supply of spoce use, neads an '" and wili be < .�ted on a comaarative basis. Local cor�etitive facilities �-. . r.urrent econonticj:;�veloprr�nf sfandards and critPria will bQ inciuded. (n addition to di�•ect st:�sisfiical data, di:eet iciterviev� on c selected sarr�aEe basis wit6 awners and o�era�ars as weif as governm2niai agencies wil( be cond��cted to gain a more incleofh aerspective of iocal mcrkefs, needs and damands wi'rhin fhe locai area. This efro;fi will assist in gainirtg an accounting oi prevalenfi business oufio�sia c�r,d/vr concerru regarding currenr siivafiions ana' expecied future canditions. Bas�d upan ehe infann:stion asserr�bi�d ard anaiyzed, en evaluatian as to general prospecis and rncrKe4> fcir land u'tiiization crsd m�rketing will b. prepared far the City of �riciey.• �»�p projecfiions wiil L� roari� on a sta�ed h�sis ti,rough'rhe year i485. As a finai parf of the P'r«se I vaarlc elemenS, we would propose fo gather sAcondary inform�tion on soil conditions fz.r tf.e aQnrrai si"re area and detarmine its adequacy 4o d�fine po4antial si?v IimS4ai°sors. ifi soils problems are inciicc��d, sui�surface ersgineerira ��iis tes'rs wauid b� r�corrrnend�d ta proviri:� an accura're rncasuremeni of icad b.cr)n� c::pacities. 2 . 1' " Due to the major involvement af City sfaff in Phase i war'r, respensibi(ities, it is envisioned thaT the wst majority of physical informational needs w311 be su�plied to the consultant for eva(uation. We would propose further that where other � directly re(ated informationa( items can be assembled by City stai{ vrithout signi- ficantly increasing their proposed work load, this again incorporated as an additional cost saving measure. 2. Phase 2: As currently envisioned, the various Phase 2 work tasks would be accompiished unde� the same approach as would be normally utilized in develop- ing a commercial area redevelopment plan, utilizing the tax increment {inancirr� mechanism as the primary mefihad for plan implementation. This approach woule generoliy oufiline alternative opportunities and avenues for implementaiion including such supplementary toois as commercial/industrial revenue bonds, staYe ond federal granfi/loan assistance, etc. In preparing the commercial area developmenf/redeveiopment pfan, ii is initially of critica! importance that all relevant issues be identified and discussed with CiSy officiais. Fo!lowing the com�letion of Phase l and the submission of a comprehensive profile summary for tiie �ubject area, rmny issues will be uncovered 4hat will reqvire discussion and corriment to �nsure proper direction in subsequenfi work phases. The appiication of exisfin� Ciiy poi ic+e� nnd adoptien oi new redeveiopment oriented policies should be unrsertak= the second step in Phase 2, &ased upon the preliminary poiicy guidelir: ra6lished 6y the City, a generaf project davelopm�nt cancept would �v prepar n cor,ju�ci icn wi'th Cit-y stor'f which would encompass generai land use, trursoor4aPion and public fociliiies elements as basic deveiopmenP parameiers ior ihe project. Following City accepiance of fihs prefiminary deveiopmenP concepY plan, we would pro�crse 4o undertake a fi��ancial feasibiiity� s4udy whicli wauid �ufly cost , put cevenue%xgense ia°�, ineiuding ec�uis��ion. si:A c�earanee ord preporation, tax impacfs, a:sociaied recieveioorrr nt cosfs, r�ale apportunifi�:s, e�c. The feasibility analysis would view cests in pro�wbie m�ges resulting from a;ternative packaging ard devefopment approach�s. F.ntici}�ted public facilities ccsts would be projected bas`d uoon City goiicy and site requirerr�nts. It is anticipated fhaP con>iderable time wauld Ize sp�r.t in Ci�y/Consultant review and discussion of the �asibiiify study results reiaiive Po its implicctions for pursuing various deveiopment altarnatives and use of cerfain im.plementation approaches. It is further anticiga;ed tnat the comaietion of Phose 2�vould mark 4he selection and establishment ot 4he reaevetopment concept and rr�Yhod(s) af imptemen4ation. 3 �� a., � 3. Phase 3: The develooment prospectus requesfed as Phase 3 of the overall proiect would be develeped bated upon the deveioomenY concept and approach methods selected at the completion oi Phase 2. It is envisioned that tfiis work product be a short description of the c:.ity's pians ror the subject sites and availaole methods for City/developer participation in plan implementation. As suggested in the Request for Proposal, this short project description (prospectus) would be integrated into a complete promotionai package which can be used to facili4ate development interest and provida an informatiorrcyl forum for City�deveioper project discussion and negotiation. 4. Phase 4: Rhase d tasks mustr, by necessity, await definition until the resvlts of Phase 3 efforts can be evaluated. However, it wou4d be anticipated, if the project can be mode feasihle, �hat Ph�se 4 wc+uld tnvolve working sessions with the City ond prospective Ceveiopers in reviewing and evaluating proposed devefopment plans and generaliy providing technical assistance/administrai-ive supervision thro�h Ehe initiation of 4ne iedevelopa+ent project. PROJECT SCNEDUC.E The deadline compfetion times nc+fied in tne Request for Proposal are viewed as reasonable for production time needs. lt should be nated, however, 4hat the time involved in eoordinafiing and b(ending team wark cr"r"orPS with City staff, ensuring that local business- men cre niven eve:y oopo;tunity Yo noriicip�rte +r }�artnership with th� City, and psoviding sufficient time for fhe City ta ihorovohiy review and discuss report findings witrh the consultant� Citv residen'rs and 'twsinessmen et the �ompletion of each work phase is generaliy substantiaf. if nas bzzn nur expenence in tha past that du� to the compiexity and sometim�s controversial nature oi ESSUBS haing dealt with, redeve{opment p4anning and implementaiion, if Prueiy .uccessiui, is generaily a ien�thy and educational process. PRESENTAT I0�1S A public pres�nte4inn of eaeh phcse praduct to discu>s thr findings and imalications is envisioned at ihis time. It is recoynized, nowever, 'nc�fi tne addifiional public presenfations rmy be required ie discuss th= resuits oi'nases 2 end 3 0� the project. Accorcii�,qly, we would propose to attenci six (6) pubfic meetings fnr presentaPion purposes, tJ�eei'ings with City staff and business groups wovid be attended as necessary ano reasonab(e Po ensure gcod conmunication besween eor�uiiarst, City officials c�nd Ciiy bv>inesses. 4 �� ,,,, _ , PROJECT BUDGET The cost �o develop the re�levelopment plan through Phase 3 ior the City of Fridley is estimated at $19,500. Shis budget is based upon antici}�ated work requiremenis as outlined in the Qreceding paragraphs and submission of fifty (50) copies of the �.i�c�reents stipulated. Services would be charged on a time and expense basis. The comn. ';iPy wouid be charged onlY for that portion of the budget required to compiete the ;. •ct. If any differences be4ween the lio�riy and expense charges ond the moximum p� t budget resulted, remoining s'unds w�uld be left with the community and would r,-.: ae cloimed by the CansvlFant. A detailed breakdown of the progrom budget by phuses is found below. PROJECT PHASE Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 T 07AL F�E $8,500 $9,500 51,500 R/A* $i��5S30* *Pi�nse 4 c�sis r.ann�t !�e ex!irc�ated et this 4ime. Ar,e4rdirx�ty, a seoarate proposai cvvld be formula4e� a7 the completion of Phase 3 or fees could be charqed on a strict Sime and expense basis. PRO.fEC.? PERSQt�NEL Jim Christensen, Viee President of iJ�idwest Planni�g and ReseQrsh, Ing, w9�ld bs ths Principal in Ciiarge of the qroject. His ro!e in t'r�e rridley projest wsuld .be te holsi primary re>ponsibility to �he Ci'renr r'•7r ��erail yucslify af Midvrest Plonning's wvs� �ns� aftendance an� presen4c�;iar� a4 mojor commuriity n��etit�s, Cither staff spssisil'i�f5 wc�ufd �e drawn into Phe projeeY as required. DA4eiisd resumas ot oiher Seni9r4��.r'4 who woula Iik�ly canfiribute to th� pro{ect are provided �n �h� fflliowin� ss�ti� ef thi3 Qao, oaol packet. 5 .i�. .. ....� . . . ��,'�A Y T�F 4� ��+"�. +�, :r � , �..�, w .,, �,:.., �`w%' � � an..F :..F 1..s' 4� ��°"�� October 25, 1978 9�0 Northwestem Financial Center ::JC� Y.etxes Avenue South � �'.cior.�`rn:�t�fi 11�inswsota 55732 Pi�one: (G12) 831-9000 Mr. Jerrofd Eoardman City af Erid(ey 6Q3t University Aven�e N.E. Fridiey, Minnesota 55d32 CONTRACI' FOR PROF[SS►OI�!AL SERVICES INTfcODU�iC)N During the pasf yenrs there has been a recognitian of the need for market anolysis and {and planning as a 6asis for encouraging a�id promoTiny �he redeveioprnent of urban areas. 7he dawntown cre�of �,-id�;>y, gener�ily [:cat,c' at the irji'ersectiion of Hi3n�n�ay 47 (Un:versity Avenue N.E.) a�,d Mississippi Streef, is one sucn area where idenfitficaiion of land use and appropriate pubEic financing, if cny, wouid facilitate the redeveiopmeni process. Development Concept Corp�ration (DCC), a privatei� owned Twin Cties i�aseci consulting fi�m providing market research, lar,c� economics and iand planning services, feels ifs skiils are particuiarly usefui in r.00rdinatin� ard conductinc� tlie Uownrown Fndiey revitalimtion study. Our past experience witn both private developers and public agencies , ro��ides us witn ca {ramework for identifying reaiistic and desirable commercial and residentia{ &ond uses for tanc� in the Downtov.n fridley area. PU�POSE The purpo>e of the revitaliza#ion study is to ideniify realistic commerciai, recreutianal and residential Ear.d uses whicn wouict cr�ate a focul paint for Fridley cemmunity shoppir.�: and sarvice activities in its downfo�vi� area. 7he revitalization study �voufd al�� include a review af the viab}e rinancinp a!tema;ives, such as tax increment fin�ncing, the staging plan and ihe economic impac't of various lcnd deveiopment strategies. 7he revi4ulization study would then 6ecome rhe basis for Phe deve(opment prospectvs which can be distri6uted to private deveioaers. The consultan� wouid coordinate between the Ci'ry staft, iocaP �n.� ti � .� � Mr. Jerrold Boardman October 25, 1978 Fcc;e Two business and other afPected cifizens, potentia! developers and public agencies c;�pdbfe of providing financing for the project. The following is a description of the Swpe of Services proposed by DCC. VJe propose to translate findings into specif'rc recommendations or strategies which Phe Cihj staff and Councif could evaluate for the revitalization of ciowntown Fridiey. SCOPE OF SERVICES The proposed revitalization study �4ilf 6e conducted in four p4�ases with tvaenty (20) copies of the task reports prepared at the compietion ar' each phase. The Consultant ti�vill review each report with the �ity of FridEey a, well os other designaied parties 6efore the iniiia- tion of the fol{owing phase. Phase I Deve{opmenf ConcepY Crrporation wiil prepare c survey of the sife irom m�tericrls provided by the City and a soi=c :rr;«ir:eer. The site survey wi(l indiwte throuaie m�ps and daYa the present conditFon, u= ,ysicc�i charccierisitrs, avaifabi[ity and size of muniripal services, auto and pedestrian : pattems, and surrounciiny land uses oi the site(s}, f'Fie foilowing elements wii{ be spe:. , i{y incfuded in the site survey: 1. Physicaf chara: :; istics includiny: size af p�rcels; sc�ils; undergruvnd structUres; and topography. 2. lJff-site charac`eristics inciudiny: size; canacity and location of municipwl services; avaiiability of naturaf g�s; location and capacity ai efectrical services; Sife relationship to streeis; capaci;y of street; volume of traffic; oriyifi und �estf- nation of iraffic; pedes#rEc�n tratYic; and surraunding fand uses. 3. Present zoning conditions and pai-ametets inciudin� siyraage; design and f�ei�ht restricfiions. DCC will a(so prepere o survey of social and economic ft�ctors for a trad� or servic� area for downtown Fridley. A geographic Prade area will be designaied for the ciowntovm area based on cwrent travei patternsr com��ii'rive faciiiiies, r,aturai barriers or const;cints. This trade area wiil 6e a�atyzed to determine twe derr.ographic and economic chcrncteris- tics including: � ._ f ' �� Mr. Jerrold Boardman October 25, 197$ l. 2. 3. 4. 5. Page Three Population nnd household trends. Building permit data. Age and sex disfribution. Average per capita and household inrnme. Trade area buying power indicafing typical household expenditures by type of goods and services. DCC will conduct an office space needs study inciuding evaluation of current office sr,�ce within the study area and a projecfion of type, amount, and quality of needed ofrice ; _. Existing housing and medical office space studies will be reviewed and recommendatic to the type, amount, price and quality of facilities marketable in the Areo wiii be ma. , The City will conduct an inventory of existing uses in the market area. DCC �xill sum; �.irize this information for the reporf nnd an attitudinal survey oF the existing owners will be con- ducted by DCC. The attitudinal survey wi[i include: 1. Owners' desire to redevelop. 2. Owners` estimate of their properties market value. 3. Problems owners have had with the site. 4. Opp�riunities owners eee fnr the area. The purpose of Phase 1 is to ideniify realistic redevelopmenfi land use strategies for Yhe downt�wn Fridiey area inciuding reiaii-commerciai, recreationai and resider�tial davelup- ment options. Phase l wifl be conducted during a sixty (60) day time period and all maps, data and recommendations will be presented in a bound repo:t, iwenty cooies of the reporP w+ll be defivered. The cost of Phase i, excluding ihe soiis data, is �9,500. !t is esii.n�ted that the soils en3ineering r'ee vEau{d be $�,5Q0 fio w2,000. Phase II DCC will prepore a report analyzing the various Iand deveEopment strategoes realistic for the downtown Fridley market area. �ine foiio4ving wi(i be reviewed in the rRp�rt: 1. Estimate of a�rrenF value of sifie o: sites to be redeveloped. a. Purchase price of sste{s} wili be based on assessor's markef v�lve of property and DCC`s evaluaiion of assessmenfi. 5his evill not constitute an appraisal and will �e ussd for financia! planning oniy. .}_ ......�. .73 ' . Mr. JerroSd Bcardmcn October 25, 1978 b. Demoliiion costs as estimated by local contraciars. e. Sife preparation as es'rimatad by locai contrractors. d. Site improvement costs including utiiities, streeYs, etc. e. Other costs as determined. Page Faur 2. Project the impacY o� the development strategies on the fiovr of tnx revenues. e. Staged acquisition costs. b. �nterim bonding interest costs. c. Other revenues or c.GSfis associated wiih redeveloprc�ent strategies. 3. Evaluate available federal, state and locoi financial assistance for redevelopment of downtown Frid{ey. Estimefe amount and type of financiai assistance fnr various types of deveiopment including Section 8 housing, industrial revenue bonds, econo- mic deveiopment administration funds, and ether �eriinent iunding sources incluoing tar. incremenf district. 4. Project current m�rket value of cleared land for downfown Fridlsy by h�pe of irnd use. 5. Assist City in selecfiing land use deveiopmeni c,rogresm with hiyhesi deveiopment potential whiie reaching Cifiy's goal ior aesirebfe land uses compatibie with other exisiinc� and poten;ial �eveiopments. The Cifiy wiI{ evaluate proposed deve �?nment strnfegy in reiation tc+ si're coverage, design sea'rures, access ooints, liahi� signage and neighborizood im�act. OCC wif! sesbconircct to � traific angi� �x iraffic nnafysis oi fihe redeveiopme�i strategy(ies). 6. Based on the aforementioned land use pfanning and r'i�ai�cial evafuotion, o sPaging plan for the market orea wili be recommanded. ;he stce�ir,g plan �;;ii! incluue size of pc?rcel, type of cieveiopmeni ior ecch �arcei as7ci �otenfia; com��nations �r sifes for redeveiormanfi. T6e Phase If report wili in�lude maps and data s:.�n�:. ` cing afternative la�C use pl�ns for downtown s=ridley, their financiai impfications on : .x revenues, ��tenti�� scurces of funding inciuding tax incremen'r anol}�sis, marker �:. . ;�f ic�a tiar redeveiopme;�t a�d staging pian for redeveiopment. f•'ihase 1! v.�iil be cc;:.yr,�led in 120 days and tv,enty cepies of ihe report wii( be deiivered. 7he cosf oi Phase If, exciuc�ing fh� tra�ric engineering data, is $13,500. !t is esfiimated ihat the fraffic study, depending on ihe sca3e and �ype of redevelopment proposed, wouid runge From $1,50fl Co $v,G00. , �,t Mr. Jerrold F�oarrimcsn October 25, 197a Phase I I f Fage Five QCC would prepare a development prospectus v:hich would be used to generate interest and provide sufficienf information for developers to pregare development pla:u for the re- development area. 1`he developmeni prospectus wo�+ld include: 1, 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. (ntroduction to site and informafion provided in Phase f report. Objectives of Phe �ty. Financing program. Stagir,g cnd timin,y desired by City. Type of iand uses desired. $ite suitability for uses. Request for proposais py �arcel. Market prica ef pro�ert� . Physical or politimi consPrainis in redevelopmenr of peoperty. $u�missinn ree,uire:nenis incl��ing: a. Narne of �deveSoper. b. Names of deve{opm�nt team (arohitect, contracto;, etc. j c. Descripticn of past deveiepmenfs anc� c[ient lists. d. �equess ;or pu€:iic irrj:.ave�ncn�s or assis�ance. e. Projectschedule. ihe Pnase lii devedopment prospectus evili °se revie��ed 6y th� City staff and then will be sent to a lisr oF �o?ential aeveiapers, 'L`�C wiii conduct ci l�csi fovr (v) oublic pres�nta- tions of the deveicnrnent proarcm tc oqfetuial d:v�{ooers, D�.0 wiil accepP pronosols, and fiefd c;e.�estions and concerns os �:,'reni;al deveia�ers. Ti�e preparation of 'rhe uevelop- menP praspectus wiii be completed oueiag a 90 day fiime period. The cost of Pi�ase ll is �.5�0. Phese E1/ DCC wiii con"rinue Fo CDfl�UCS" C�C'!]°ffFl ;vcri:ing sessia;�s, estcaotish a ra:'in� aaproach to evaivata proposals, cn�a aid in 'rhe decision rracess. f�iis phase can 6e conducten on a 4ime and materiais oasit. G:�� currani cnarya is ;?5.00 pen c�ur. A budge� eor the phese ecsn be estabiisi�r:d ar tiie end af Piaese (;l. INfORPv1�,T�ON TO i3E PitOVIGL3 AY 71i� CLicNT DCC expecfs the sfiafF of FriJlev §o prn•✓ida a1i ir,(armation as sef fo�th in Atfachrnent B in i�he reques4'For tiies Propowi. �� , �, Mr. Jerrald Boardman Octa6er 25, 1978 COMPLETlON 71ME AND COST OF SERVICES . The comp(etion time and cost or seevices for each phase is as follows: PAYiv1E NT Phase Time • Cost Page Six Phase I 60 Days $ 9,500 +soil enyineerina costs Phase if 120 Days $]3,St�0 +traFfic engineering costs Phase III 50 Days $ 4,5U0 Phase N 6U Days $35.U0 per hour The services listed under Phase f through !il r�i[l be comoleteci fos T�rrc-n'y S�ven Thousand Five Hundred Doliars ($27,50d). Each Phase wi�( �e billed on a mor�tn(y basis. Payment for each month{y bi{ling wi{{ be due within ten (i0} d�y of receipt o1 sPatement. To each unpaid sfateme�t wil( be aaded a service charge ot o;ie (1} percent per month on the ur.paid balence. T ERh1f NAT IU N This agreement may be terminated opon ten {iQj days wr+tten notice by eiiher pnrty. 1n the event of termination, the Ciient �viil �ay Ueveiopment Concept i:�rporation Eor work compieted on a tiroe plus materials basi�. if this proposat meets v�ith veur approvai, please sign and ragurn or,e copy �o tf�e ofiices of DevelopmenP Concept Corpor�iionu This agreement is made in the State ef Minnesoia and vrili be construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. Agreed to fhis 25th ddy of October, 19%8, by: Development Concept Corporation '✓ri L£.`�./y��L/i'"�CCc�L�00-�..— inda S. Dano�dson, Vice Fresident City of Fridley /D �5, �� Date Date _� � ; PROPOSAL FOR � CIT`i OF FRIDLEY ? Downtown Redevelopment by Professional Planning and Development , .; . 602 south 2nd street, mankato, mn. 56001 ; T�c. Jerrold L. Boardmaa City Plannes, Fridley 6431 University Ave. N,E, Fridley, Minoesota 55432 Dear Jerry: �'J�'��_',SS1Qt�c�� f:, .;�:� plann�n� � � �5;��' cl.t� —=�--� �= R *�-��' � cie�el�pm�nt ��. October 24, 1978 507-345-1290 Again-3erry, I thank you for [he opporeunity to submit the following proposal for the Fridley downtown rev<_tilization Qrogram, I was extr�mely pleased to see thst your "�°quest for ProQosal" so closely paralleled our first submfssion to yout office, I obvioualy teliev0 that your appzoach to this project is correct and I co�liment you on your serious profe�si�nsl approach ta tha redevelopment opportunity, BecRUSe Pro£essionaI Plrsnain� �nd 7evetopment is so involved ia 6ath publ:.c aector redeveloament and private secCor redevelopmene, I believe we have learned the importance of ;oint pubi.ic/privats cooperation, Zt is oot necessary to poi�C ou[ [he advanta;es of joint cooperation exaep�_ tn make you aware th�t our �iporosch fzivolves YrivaCe interesi:s na me11 sE pubiic plenning, professional Planning and nevelopmont �ill uae ell ita experlence as both a public sector consulting firm and s private sector development and consulting firm in essisting Es::d dcvelooir:g s dawnteG±o redevelopment program, k'e pri�e ourselves irs b�ina i�roolved iiz imalementing aad csrryin; ;>ro�ects to a sCagc oz uev�la�,afent snd not juat cucmittirig plans, i•.P,'�D, wilF approsch thia redevPloumenC erfort c�+ir.h the utruo:�t professioasi ineegzity never confusing tiae r�;zivste interest c�ith Che public responsinility. �.P,&D, wfll, hoeaever, use all ��ivate resource people availab2c to insure a Uell tested market, alternstive dzvelopment �aroposais, an:7 s strong euclysis of city costs e:�d city rirks, Professior.�l Plnnning and Development ia hapeful o£ being selected eo do thia wor.c, [;e 6elieve we are very w�ll qualified, we balieve cse c+£fe: apecial skitls, and •,�e are dedicated ta providir.� e�:periencad professionel staff, l.gafa, we arr� appreci�tive of tha opportunity ena hopeful nf heing selected, DD/lgk Sincerely, � �� 1��_,�.___ Dean Dog+achar Presideot l . PROGRAM OF WORR (INTRODUCTIOH) I, REY SERVIC�S TO BE PROVIDED A, A aucceseful market analysis and a potential redevelopmeat program vill require certain key services. Throughout thie study there must be a close working relationship with the local buainesemen who are preaently aperating within the atudy area, Profesaional Planning and Development will form this workinR relationshin early in the atudy, The working relationsiiip will concentrate on aevernl important aspecta, Firat, P,P.&D. will form a task force comprised of lesders fram these bueines�es, Second, P.P.d�. will sv9tenatically determine the local � businesemen's attitude ond underetanding of a redevelopment program, Thia etep wilt require a progzemmad approach offering optiona to and for redevelopment, For example, apecific progrem formation will illuatrate the possibilitiea of tocal businesses joining forces in their own r�devetopment prop,r_am rehabiliCatin� and up�radin� their own businesses and structures, 4'"�: j,oining as a limiCea partre- with 3�energl pnrtr.er/developer. 2*_c. ` p,p,6D, will Qresent the �bove informatioa with specific �ttention townrd defining c:se existf�sg v�lues, mar.kets, and site utitiz�tion under the present land util.zation. P.P.&A. will work with this task force on en on-going_basis, The program of work will necessitate e good basis of information regerding Phase I of this study, A2though the Req�eat for Propossl defiues Phase I ss primerily the responsibility of the City, P�P�&D_,,, mill wori� close2v with �he Ciey to i.nsure consistentiv use�ule in:are�ation, B, A second key feature 1a to form a close relat+onahip with ootential developers, market researcn ffrme. �nd site desinn consultants, It ie important to note here tha[ P.P.&D. has consistenCly presented to the City the alternative merket analysie of havfng the private investcent busiaessea determine CFee market, Bec&use tile City hes choseu thia course, P.P.6D. f�ela it is impartant thut a certain Ievel of uaderst�adiag be shazed, �� IIoth a eound mMrket analycis and � redevlopmeat �;lan should bs et�aed over a determtned periad of tina, Tne staging of thia re�evelopmenG plon will obviously cauae m�rket analy�ie infozmation to be aither outdated or uae£u � depending on the criteris eatablished for collectin� it, P.P.F.•D. will therefore early in the etudv determine a staving p?an ior redevelopm�nt and ob{ectives for each Darcei of the zedevelopment pian, If sound objectives are established and a ataging of development ie determined, me will be able to adequately determine market analysis informatioa and Phase IV decfeioa- meking segarding proposed redevetopment sctivitiae, C. A third key feature fs Che interaction between priva[e development oppottunitiea and City tisk of both finaacial resourccs and future laod utilization, P.P.bI1. is concerned that city risk must be minimized and will therefore look st redevelooment activities fro� the viev ooint of jaint coo eration between not on! the Citv and orivate developer but betwee❑ the Cit and Faderal and &[ste � encies, For example a cnrefully pragrammed zedevelopmene plan can meet city objeetives while correspondingly meeting � ..: the goals of Federai actd State agencies, W� do ❑ot wieh .o suggeat that the City objectives ahould be gzestly compramised ia order to achieve Chis intergovern�enlal cooperetion, buC ratFr;r ta �e ecutely aware in preparing a redevelopment plsn thct outside �overnmental sssistance may be avsilable. Specificsitv, p�' � hag previouslv suF�ested to the City Chat a Department of Housing and Urbaa Development ra r8m Section 202 Housinv Assistance Project msy be avaitsble for one of the land parcels within the redevelopmenC area. If this p7an carefully ex�slored said gossibility, H.U.D. snd E.D,R, �y be convinced to worls clos�ly with the City on such activities as utility improvements, off-�it� recreatfon improvemeoes, land ecquisition costa, relocetion costs, or loao monies for other potential users, p p&D caill csrry forwsrd all such conversntion�z nnolic�tions. and othex communicatxons with these levels of government, This key fectar will aot only miaimize city ri3k, but �iv� iirrpetus to the redevelopmenr effort, B. E� fourth i:ey fector in thia study ia determioins metlzodfl to earry out the Eoale scv= obj�ctiv�s of thx res:�velop�ent plan, Certsinly sn obvious method E ��.� ie to explore tax increment financinR, P.P.&D. will insure that this ❑ethod ia fully explored including the development of 3pecific financiei pians, However, methods for implamentation �use go ��ch brosder thnn ju3t T.I.F. Initi�lly , P P&D. will explore with ehe local businesa interests auch thinga as establishin� an assess�en[ districe with City bonding as e finance eource, P.P.&D. will sdditionally expibre Economic Devetooment Administration Assistance including loana to proapeccive developera aad sharing of improvemeot cosCa, P P bD will alsa investi�ate R.U.D. assistaoce M H F➢ Assistance, and S.B.A, assi^tance, At the completion of thi� study, there wi17 hn sn Analysis of ine[aods available for attractin� developers Azid f!nancin� n�cessary ir..nzov�mencs, This element must also recognize the import�nce of staging developmeAt. P,P,&D, will �saist the City directiy in any ae��tifftioQS oec.w.ae�ry ie committing a privata inveetor to a r¢d�vclopraent Qsrcel, E, A fifth kev factor ia constant cousmunication with Ciey officimis. P.P.SD. vill establish a Ci.ty task force c�hich will mcet periodic�lly for ull purposes oi accomplishing said study. '1'he aoove tASk �orcGe wili be charged Uith recommeading coaraes of sctioa, establiehing priorities aod ob�ectives, meeting vi[h prospective develo�>er� add o.hex �uc� dutias Ghst vi1l e�hance the euccessEul i�lementaCioa o: r�3evolop�muC F] �.. \ J�. KEY ISSUES ` 1CJ BE DECIDED FARLY I, P,P.&D, will asslat in deterPining the genersl approach to theae i�suca and will present a Folicy report addressing each of these: 1. Shall Fridley eatabiish a policy regarding Che development of ell the potentisl percels immediately or develop a clear snd yet flexitsle dxvelogment schedule? 2, Privste interest in radevelopment mey be limited by merke[ foaces euch as current prime rste interest chargee, This iseue should be examined immediately through personel contacts, P. brief aynopsis vill enalyze thie isaue and oeher market limiting concerns, 3. The City m.�y wisli eo est�blish a redevelopmeat sch^dule which r�cognizeo local concerus inclading relocation alternaCives and costs, mhis issue musC slso be addressed in a brief analyeis ellowing for public polfcy decieione, 4, Xedevelopment plsns may just be explored end tailor°d aroun3 funding �„ sources of St�te and Federal monies. T°his issue will require verq early contec[ wi�th funding agancien by the coasultant, 5. Redevelopmsnt plana �say be initisted on e schenul� cieeermi.ned by X,li,D. or E,D,A, fundi�b cyc2ca, Certainly Chis iasue musC be .�ciciressc,ci c�srly by L-h� con�ult�nt to insure reliabLe information to all inter�sted. psrCies. 6. Mar:cet atudfes �;h411 eitne: be r�pec�fic�lly tsr�se�eci accarci±ez�; to ohjeetives e�C�bliuh:d fcr th� redevelo?smarat os �asy Ue i;enaral7y cc:s.iled iu en effort L•o e<�s3r� in the formul�tiaa� ot a%jeetfv�s. Ttsi� ir..�� °.;hall require d�tcr�ain�,tioa lster siGer c;relininary ea;�loraCioa of issu;:s 1 Cetru S, Theae are key issu�� t�ta:t will be resenrcti�d by th:� coasvlL,�at ead px�^mWn�:c:d ecLty to s cita L-eask £aecr. �eninCio; i: Chia cvarle, t_ 4 � PF3A5E Y p,p,&.D. WL�L ASSTST Tt� CITY iH ALL OP PHASE I. p, �9e steted in our firat responae, thie information and the menner in which it ie made available ia critical for early teating of redavelopmeot objectivea, rasrkets, and coata or redevelopmeat, " g, p,p,&D, will uae Johnaon, Sheldon, and Soreneon, a Minneapolie Architec- tural firm to place redevelopment ideas unto each poteatisl parcel. gy eho�ring potential redevelopm�nt ideas graphically both the City and the private market place will tsetter be able to determine opportunitiea and objectivee. , �, The compilacion of aite inforroation will also be ahared early with State and Federal agencies. P.P.&D. will meke SmmediaLe coatacta �ith appz'apriate governmental vfficiAls and insure that Phese Y mctiviti�s are done Sn sueh a c�annar a�e ia constructive in future Ped�rsi decfsian meking, D, p,p,&D, wi11 determine soil suitability as to drainage, load ca�acity, and limitetio!�s. � g, p,p,&D, will faventory necessery dcta to deteraine both potencia2 usera and specifir_ limftatio6a auch as s�ze of fscility, timiug of �eed and cosrp�tins locstiona. g, As ststed previausly P.P.6D. will i�mediately i8e�itlfy aaf� pco�Ir., cnd; 1, Form e task force that will m.�et periodicslly. 2, p,p,bD, e�ill supply to 8aid ownezs all information &s it is farthcamiag cor.eeraing Phsse I iesve�itories, 3, p,p,&D, vill grsphic�lly illu3trete �rotenti€l redeveiog�ant fdeas. 4, p,p,&D, will syr�tematically determiae the 2lmitations tand opportunities th�t ttie existing owners envision, Thie will be done thzo�Ygh r:a inv6ntory �rocess including a�uestionair� o€ ehoppers �nd s€:c�re e�ployees, g, p,p,&D, wi11 addiU.onally determine local deeires for futiy pnrticip�eing ice any redevelopmene �ctivity including the �setablishm�nt o£ a redevelopmeat distr:et with T�x IncremEnt Finrncic; �=!d �'Uaessmebt diatzict cn¢ebiaation, (�, p,p,&A, wiLl offer �n aQalysto of relocaticn costs, if cu}•, rsnd �,rogrc�a e!xwtt�o� far. ceectis,� L•hoac� reqairecrreata ic� i11 Srs�Ylcr,::rat«�Cion � ��"p5. S � N J'' �V1CO:11 LL}ftSY I Although this phasa of wort: ix the primsry responsihility of the City. P.P.&D. has progosed the �dditional vork �nd ou:�..�me af: 1, Aasiating the City in s�id �so;:. inaure conaistently usenble date (e,g, all data is at same scale .- =o bo ieProduced egsily, sixed in report forca, anslyzed from privatE .�<ciividuals perapective, aad clear in such determinstions as to whet car,�7i csnaoC he aone). m, Work to bas done ir� 50 eiays, b. Outco�e- a us2eble S� x 11 r.��=art including all 3ata. 2. Soila analysia ioclud±rig Iimitstioaa �and drnfnage. a, Work Ca be do�e ia 60 dsye �serformed by 1'�id CiCies Soil Explor+�tioQ Sezvicv, 3, t� re]oca[ian plau �nd �nalysis ict re�orC for:a so as to be evailatle for deaision a�aki4g Uy loc�i buein�.ssmen 8nd City of£icinis during the early est�bliahmrr.t of goralc� una o�j�ctivee, a. t�'or3; to �e doe�e `❑ 7t? oz;�a pex�oxm°W� by P.F.&4. l y, � regort tfi�t sasslyz�� tr.e service area specificwlly, the reporr shall inciude tyFvs of uy�rs, FLL�tly,i� oi �aee�3 os �uch U9P,Z3y anslysis of co�petin� lcscations far 4ucii u�ea::, fAr:�ncial i�iaitstiioas said ucexs have for l�nd scqe:isition eng2Yai: cf user� �nd their ia�saet an eurrovneiing property, eS�i.s se�ort sh�1l iac:tuda tne neceas�ry du[u to aetermiue dpecieal ne�ds ttaut msy �asic: iu ..+L�b".=�i.s�; c:Yv�Io�er, r.. 6?or% c:ili w^ �o�� ia "i� c�,yse ��s^rfu:rur�: hy P.:.GD. c;a�.[2 ;;i.��i�l atte�tien �„it*en by p:iv�tc: nevela;�Gre, 5. Fozsetiau oi � Locsl busi.°c��s:: c�ar.�xt�•�e caiL-h � etervey to dee�•rmine Cheir apprsiaal of t6e ��rY.et tce��y ,:nn ti.�a uggori:unities ehey see. ��dditionr�ily, pereons�l in�arviews u%ilY b��: _'nn�:. �o c.as�s� cies::cs o: loc�l �usi_nessmen Co pttrCiciF�Le ia � rdde�=ls%;:,:,°nt pxogr�m i'.P.b]. will conclude �11 t�ork witia local bucines� coac;:rr�� a:�l,y uft�r ehey a�,:ve been involve�i in all phases of thic stuay snu nave u�terui�:��+ th�ir ro!�, Y,'r.&D. saiil �rasenC opCfond far locul ir.�oivF�,�.:^ . ir,�7.u3iu ; sssea�a�nc(ir�;?:oeeu�vnt disCricta �a�2c� ehs �c�:aciuli�;� ri re - °?r°rC cct�ivie�es th„•. w�i.11 �Lwb �3iu� eda@ia�te, tid:r�. Co c.e �c�_� fu12 � f.r.: .. .:n t3;ie ia�=�;_Ic:,ca.��nee C� �. �; �. � FLrther, P,P,b�, w-iII ��sirst tho City €nd 2occ1 Lerva�toxo in detormiaing redevelopm�nt optlone, a, Work to be on-going. 6. Dr�ft �lter.nativm archirectural pl�na illustrating pot�ati�l development optiona, s, Iuitial work 90 daya, b, Sub�ro,ueat dr��iaga during Phaae II work, ' . d , , — PT',hSE II WORR PfiOGRA?t Zt ie import�nt in �� phase thet apecific and concisc� iaformatio�¢ ia developed, p,P,&A, will insure thst e�ch of t6ese teeks are truly refleceive of �ctual m�rket coaditiona, A. Sxiating value�: P.P.&A, c:ill I, Deretdine cogt or �rurchase zand east of deaoliCian by �a�;sloying certified inaependenr ��spzaisers eead constructio❑ ff.-os. 2, Site im°yravemeata and other costa will be deter�ined Iry �nginearing ntuaiea, 3, Tfxe ice�ortrtace of ��termir.i.^�g thes� costs is to insur�: e. valid enelyc�ic of futuru £ir.r.^.cir,� m_�thad� it�cYuair+g T�:; Sncre�vat Progr�nsufng, (Cose� by P.F.6D.) B. Losee of eax ravenue.... (-'•<ain ehe i�orttnC f�ctor here ie r� true enalqdiv of futurc financir.� r�ct6ods). ti`� . 1, �,on�ia�o cestr� caill be detern;ineu by t:�nployin� c: reg2st�red fl�zmncf�l �'�-% concult�dt (cosl-� by P.P.&^.), 2, D+:tcrmir.i.g �cquistian str€Cegi�a s��s?i b� e;:�Iored in saC l�:ast 3 uption5 sc tii: t fut� r.� snslysis af ;rr.iv�Ce pro�esals ccn ba sdequfftely �xscssed, Fe: exsonle, P,P,&.^., uaist Uuild in fleasbility for �ccou�odsti.ng Fctect.cl dev�?opaeat �ro,os�ls v�tte st+,LL being �ble Co jud�� e�c:i piopi,s�:I ag�inst caec�� incl Lu�.:in; sourecs, C, F<.dcr:.i �nd �t,;t� :•rozr€.�..zin; £:a.P.c�I3. c�,'iIl �aplo3e these a,�tions i�a tt;�ir entirety an4 re�sort to th: Ci.'y in wrfting including �n e�ses�ment oP the chsc;ces of succes�, 1, P,P,&D, c�ill explarc: ag�ciY'icelly 5ectioc� .2G2 F.ouain� ??roject. 2, P,P.&D. s�ill supply .il �rcSLtectcr�l cerviccs :�eeded, 3, P,P.&D, zLill eitIier esuse �aueh nn r+pplicstion to be a:�ba£Gted or �s�ist loc;l iutcreste i:� sucn s sut+missio.a cahic2� :vcr 13 sppropriate, 4, P.P.&D, will Ap�rly £or Coc:��nity Devclo,w�nt �o:rica er,3 law interest losn nxonies x�f�e�n a�.pio�sr�ifltn ana necescary, 5, P,P,&D, c,.iZl insus� t;i:cst all iaforc�tiau cnllecte�i iu :;�r�se� I is F--, [aati�factory for FEdera7 ;�:ace�,s?^� �nc: t„iIi ev1l.�Lt 311 ot?:r�r �-' inforcnatiar Ghec m�y bo r�qulred, B �_,, l X D. Vslue of ].and for re-aale (thia tnformseioq ie cricicel for reilecting ee accurate future fioancing ra�thod), � 1, P,P,&D, w111 insure that xt ieest 3 priv�te developers respond epecifically to purchaae optiona, Q, p,p,bD, will determine financing slternativca vy �saeasing buy back optioos, Thia may vary by type of development, 3. P.P.&D. wi11 do s complete 1,I,F, EinEncinl plsn including e comQuter read out oE �.ay back consequencen, Lnfletfon, city bonding rates and all other r.ecessary informatton, 4, P,P,&D, will assi.et both local pt�rti�s end othara by providing poeenCiai land use drn�,ings, 9, ^lhe iceportaat espect here ze lh�t +ae draft a sound finsncial analysis fram��rarl_ fcr dc.cisia❑ caking i[zclading �vail�bil:ty and timing of Federcrl moniea, nee�saary Iaead a�zle ��.�uata, �nd n�cessary tax dollors iro�s fuCUre developm<r.ts, E, LanA percelin� (rsgaSa L-.P.tx�. vbit haiYd {n �1e��;�fi2ey tsy �aGe:mining at Icast 3 o�sCions.) 1, The apkions will be baseci on p?reliminar}' �CC�C�6139 by Pederal of£ic:al�, by T,I,P, cesh floca nacd�, by our pretinici�.y r�loceei�o �alicies, hy locel constxaints for. ��.istin; bi�s�::eWaee, �nn Uy lr:r:d auii�hility including sizes, access, aAd eveiP�biliky. 2, P,F,&D, c�ill re�o;t on ali �l�;: t;'vo1r� f�scCorc �zcc r�i:: ;.c�fosm��ioa &Ia�II be tre�ly diss��i�: t�d, � 9 � • ; \ J . OUTCOi1E PFLA"sE IY This work will be done within I20 days sfter Fh�se I, 1�e wori: will incZude ae�srate reparta deeailing; A, Coats - 6y independent appraigers and contracCarn. g, Site impro��ements - by engineerin; �nalyeis, C. Tax revenue - by bor�aiag consultsntc �rd eppr�fsers caiCh 3 methoda, D. Federal. pro�ramming - ceparatcs regort, nctu�l mpplicatfona, �saessment of chances, assistance 1n applying fo;. SectLon 202, 5uppry£II� of peraons�i contacts, devaloping �rcni��ctural drawings, E, Value of land - seoarate report with „t Ie��t 3�rivet� ;^srties responding. A complete T,I.F, finsnciat plan, g, I.nnd Parceling - rc:part based on ttie abave iQ£or�.�=eion iacluding 1.Z.P. needs, Federal tioing and financing int�re�t eosts. R�}5oxr. sixali �lso eaalyzc aiziag, acce�s, and avail�hiif�y, �., 10 f �' PFiASL� IYI td�R1C AND OLPiCQME Phaae IIY is really o professionai presents�foa of �11 th� pr�viously collected infoccstinn, The central is�uea here ar�; i. Sound development of goaln snd objectives, 2. Sound snalysis of timing, 3. Flexability of pzoviding cleared l�nd, 4, W1de diatributioo of inforc�ation. 5. Professionnl preseneation of facts, aptio:r� end oppartuzrities. A, P.P.&D, uill insure tho cbove isauea are proparly compilec� and presented, B, P,P,&D, will insure [hae p;ood msrL•et zesearch h8s been scco�lfshed to ioaure [hat the 3evalopmei�t prospectus hats wide dietribul-ion, C, p,P,&D, will lisC �11 d��•elogers receivin� eci.d pxa,pecl-uc. TIte develo�ment prospectu� s;£alI include site ctesigns, ebjveti.•,�es re�ched ia Phase I aad ZI, exploriation oi �il fiasecin; sZtcgn�tSs�w, ti;� ccnt�tr$;.nes �nd „ o��ostui�iti�s aand a. fosraft for �rcceotin,r,, �:roj9oeat,ts. �.: p,P,&D, vill bE ses�ooaible foz �11 �bovc ��or'te �ea� �h�2i acco��li.Fh said te�kxs wit:zin 40 d.�yd of Pi�aa« Ii. ��.. 11 � � �..> F�. `� . Fr'. `�,,., ;: , PH.A5B I�J P.P.6D. c:iHl wark in this endesvor for c�naeever Cier� i� recLSSary, TTe will exerciae this work ezt the discretioa of th� City ss � cancerned partenr, Our ioterest is insuring a aucc�ssf�E projECt �nd we �ill &a �11 that ia oeceesary here, fnclu3ing bacnc tr�cking. 12 e � _, 4 0 � t COSTS All costa including Ghe servicea of en�insara. ��preie�rs. crchieecta and eAgineerB shall be paid b; P.P.6A. PHASE I p,I+,&D, is developing addition�l. iasEoresation and insuriag udequace compilation of data giva �atablishing esrly wozl:ing commiete�s mnd esrly objectiva forflut8tioa, ihis �hase r�l�o requires uua of �rc6ircc�ural re�eurc�s. $ 3,50Q.00 FAASL YI Yeiehout egrfa c:;�Ivir,ir.� aatcomea this ia e a�jor ahase. $ i,�00.00 PI3�� SE III �nis e�fart rec;ui.res prc,'�cs�iov�l t�syembTy and dissea�.cctstio�� of {afar:�Eaeas �es� orc->,o£z,`: r.;•,i�>i:�r.,e: to �1F. z_�s�rorEdcata. � 390v0.00 PH�SL� IV � �.°.r� f� �:ey ie�;ue, �fE6L' i.0 €.Si:C:::�.`J ��±i 13 �S 2 66�.t10 ...�_s. _�—_ Cyi.Jp3��,�0 �. ,. k � t" � 6Q2 soutR7 2nd street, mankato, mn. 55001 � onal anning �t � f --°: v �im'.�A�� ..,�ax s� _�'.: }t�i i lut�i� co. 507-3�b5-;290 Profeasional Planning and Developmant ie a private corporation specializiog ia both public planning snd QrivaCe development, P,P.&�, has develaped plana snd development etrategies which ere now under way: 1, The acquistion and redevelopment of all oE lower eampus of tSankato State Univeraity, This plan encompssees 41 acre�, 750,OGi7 squ�r� feet of buildings, tha develop�ant of t+ T,I.F. rM°thod, tnduKtrir.l r�yenue bonds and Qrivate long term lesaing. Total costs of �*roject to d�tE 1a ovex 3 mfllio❑ dollars, 2, Taa packaging of 5ectioa 8 fami2;� hou�iAg projeetu ip: at, Mankato b, ivew Frngue c, St, Peter d, YRoorehe�d N_ lld8 f, Rtorris �, Dodge Cezster Each of these �rojects totbl over 1,E rzillion and ��bve T,I.�, n,�thcrds iueluded a,s �ell as Fdinc:esota NiASr,ca A��acy loaas. 3, 1'ha dfreet ownership of houaing develogrr�enta in scver.�1 ciCSea ttirou�;hout Minne�ot�, 4. CiGy {slanoing coctr.scts in: �_ �Iankato b. Blue Eaxth Couaty c, Hew Prague 3, Feirmont e, Jackson f. St, Peter g, if,artics CaunCy T'nms�a contrEats �rQ on �n oa-goinU brsie. 14 �tie,;�.i c . ' ' �„" � �� Id^��b�sa of P.P.6J3. arc� rnCair�er t�: a, Lloyd Develogment b. Petrie DevelopmeaL �, Atwaod Asaoci.ates d. P.yan Constructioc� e, Boz-Son Canatructioo We hEVm c,�orked with sll the �:bove ffrm� os �ack�ging ea�sultants and end r'�r�et Enalyrsis findin�s, protessioaal Planning and Uevelopmeat will al�o use �a thic etes:�y: 1, Johctaor�, Sneldon and Sorenson l:rchitects. . 2, kfiller ��d Sahreeder zin.�:ncial cea�ultanl-s, 3. Indegendent cgpreiser. �4. $OLCf-E1 S3IACi P:4f31. 1"'+fti�l.::�Y°. p,p,�,p, feelra very coniident that tl�� cone oL ecrvic^c he-sein oaitliacd �ill lsc �rrofWw.:ion:ally do�� ana eca-y s�tisr�ctory £or th� ciCy. ��, J � 15 � - _�� cim�r � Fxm�c , � • e ��: �; � : «: �: :�- : Cnr.t xo a�t: Chairmaa Harria ca11M ths D�oe�tr 6, 1978� Planning Cooaission Meeting to �rder at 7=35 P.M. R�,L CALL• I6anlo�rs Prepnt: H�ti Storla, LeRoy Oquist, Riehard Harrle� Virginie Schnabel, Robert Pot�r�rt, 1as�e I.ang�nYsld Members Absent: None Othere Present: Jerry Boarfl�n� City Plann�r 1. APPROVE PLAHNING COI�IlYfI$SIOIP MIAI[TIBS: NOVEt�ER 22, 1978: I�'i' '9y Mr. Lsna�nleld, secondeQ by Mr. Oquist to apprave the November 22, 1978 �� Caai.s�ion 141nuteo. Ms. Sehnsbtl notsd thAt on page 5, the laet porogr4ph� CLairina Aarrie'a nome was loft a!f ttu ncord«t vate. Chairaea Harris voted eye. Mr. Stvrla aotod that on page 9� thixd paragraph ahould r�ad: "Mr. Storla stated tlut lov iaae�e poople pqy tfn L1a�s �re oP th�ir gro:o inaaee on �nergy thaa t,he s�p�r moot inca.e paoplo". Change middle inaone to upp�r moct inccse. UPON A VOICE VtrP&� ALL V4TIIPG AYE� CHAIRIAHN HARRIB DECLARBD THE MiNUP&8 APPROV�II� AS C�[iRSCT&D. 2, PfiRt.T[' $�`ARTI�l:• CONSID�iARTOffi dfi' A PROP08R1] PRRT.TYTNERY PT.AT� P_R_ �R� eR6 RYAVIN F7R8P ➢i'12T7pid EY RAY R_ V(R2NARE(7RU'R: �� a rsp]at of all of the Souihveot Qwrtor vf the Northvaet Qaartar of 3ectioa 2, T-30, R-24� An�lca County� Minne�oLaj except ths South 877.87 f�t tiuxveot'� ]yiag WQet�rly of 8tata Tru�k Hi�hwqy No. 47. Subject to oaeuant f�r utility purpoaoa wer the Aorth 20 f.at of said Southrrsst Qvarter of th� l�u�thwat Qusrter� ],ying ii�atar]y of pr�srnt State Trunk HiQhxq,q 110. b7 �xc�pt &aatar],y 115 feet theraof, and the West 20 fa�t of th� E'�otar�y 115 i�rt o! said saithvaat QuArter of the Northwst Qnartar, ]ying Neotarly and a�dJa¢ent to Wost lia� K 8tate Trunk Hi�{hi+a�y No. 47� ��aerally loc:atod at 83rd An8 Unir�reity Avannae M.S. !1lITION by Mr. Pet�rsar►, a�ca�dad by Mr. I�angtnitld to op�n tku public hearing. UPON A YOICB Vt1TE� ALL V(ri'I� AYE, CHAIRMAM HARRIS DECI�AR�D THL PU87.ZC i�ARIPiG OP&Id AT 7sb0 P.M. Mr. Bwr4iean �tated thia wae loeat�d on 83rd brt�en Main and University� wh�re th� Houss oR Lorde �ras pr�sently looateil. Thio propsrty waa soned h�avy industrinl ead they ar� lootiag at an acre aad a half pwrasl. The plattiag as l�pred out meets ell the rsquirs�ente of our platttng ordinsnee. Srirer and srAtsr ia in 83rd �treet and Main Strett and will bc exSt�ed do+m the eervice drive� w all of the lots are serve8 by erwr aad rrater. Mr. Boardm�n etated that 3tafi ielt that it should be stipulatofl that b�fore aqy dw�loptent tolc�� p].ACe, there rhould be a etora vater r�tention plan. �n all aev parcele, plate or ne�r developunta, there should be on-sito stori water retention. PLA1tNI1� COE@�II38ION M6ETING, DECEl�ER 6� 1978 - PAGE 2 Nr. BoarIIa�n stAted that there rrert 5 lota ia Blxk 2, and 1 lot in Biock 1. Lots 1 aa8 2 of Block 2, a� LoL 1 of Block l, are soaad co�srcial (C-2). Lota 3, 4 and 5 oi Bl�ck 2 aro $oned induetrial. Mr. Petereon asksd wl�at th. eitusti� rras rtgarding Park Dedicatiom. Mr. Bc�xdaan otsted that �rith camercial and inductrial property� thay tske fees xith dwelc�enL, in okh�r irordo� they charge it off as part of the Buildiag Parait. With sin�l� lanily it vould be pqyablt at the time of the plat. With cammercial and induat- rial it amourats tu 3'�. Mr. Harrio s�d the petitioa�r to step forxard. Mr. Rqy Worseb�cY�r� 3200 N. Lilae Drive came forvard a�l etatad that the reaaon theq wmtsd to plat tl�ie piQCa oP property was that fireL ot al1 ttx Houeo of Urds �ras buil€ mn part o! it aad the City� blr. B�arflmen a� thr Stdf, rras interested in having it plattoS out eo they ean use it for futher dwelopa�at, and ha xae doin� the job. Mr. Harria 4skM3 iY theq had all the necessary sasmsnts on this plat. Mr. Bwxd�an that he believad they 8id, aad acaordiag t� tha ca��Le frcan C�yde, they ha8 all thQ saeeaeate they ne�ded st thia tist. Mr. Harris eak�d if there would bs a need for oqy ease�nts on the eouth propertq line. Mr. BoarBa�a rtetad thst they wouldn�t, that all neo�swry utilitiss were in tiu boule- vard at�ea. Mr. P�tereaa� aeked if, regarding the storm wter dis�sal� it would be the napoaaibility of whcevsr took out e building perai.t oa a specifia psreel. Mr. Bcurd�an stat�d that, in thie eitvoti�, theq vould like to coordin4t� the drainage betww the thr�e parcele, and if this vae poaeibl�, they rould like to have it done ut th3s tims. If they folt they couldn't hand�e it at thie tia�, they vou].d then have to wit far the developmotnt. blr. Harris stntad tLat he felt the lota were larga .novgh t� get on-site drainage. Mr. Langenf�ld statod that thls property wae the atsrting point of their environmental tour and fr� hie obcervatioa� di8 not feel tlut on-site drainage vould be a prnblem. iK�I01� by Mr. I�wg.nfeld, aeconded by Mr. Pst�rson, to close the Public Hearing. UPf1a A VOTt� VOTE� ALL VOTIAG AYE� CHAIRMAN BARRIS DECLAREA TfIE PUBLIC HEARING CLO�D AT 7:�j0 P.M. t�TIOR by Mr. Peterson, seco�d�d by 1�x'. �qnlet to r�camt�d to Couacil Approval of t�e reqwst to amsideration oi a proposed preliminary plat, P•S. #78-06� CABA Realtq First Addit3on by Rey R. itorsabeckers Being a replat oY all oY the Southv@st Quarter oY the Northvest Quarter of 3ection 2, T-30, R-24, Anoka Couaty, MianesotaT except tt,te south 877.87 fe.t thersot, lying Weater�y �f State �uat ai�nway xo. 47. sut�ect to eoeeuent for utility purp�sea ovsr the N�rth 20 faet oY said Southwest @uarter of the Northaest Quart�r� lying Weeterly of present State Trus�k Hi�1n�Y No. 47 exaept Faeter�y 115 feet th�reof, and the Woat 20 feet oi the Sseterly 115 �@�t of said 3outh- west Qvsrter of the Nerthwest Quarter, lying Weater]y and adjac�nt to West line of 5tate 3'rux►k Highxqq No. 47, geaerslly located at 83rd and Univereity Avenuca N.E. PLARxIxG COI+a¢ssION t�rING, �� 6, 1978 PAGE 3 UPO1� A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTII� AYS� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLAR� THE MOTION CARRIED tINAPIldOUSLY. Mr. Board�qn ate,ted that the etipulation vovld bt ha�l.d vith tht Building Perait. 3• l� ey e, o a ov �aa rs e.rvi ce ar the install.ation aP eerviee etation equip�st on Lote 20� 21 +u� P2, B1ock 13� Hamilt�'a Addition to Mechanicsville� the rame being 5333 �ivaraity Av�aue N.B. MOTION by Mr. 8torla, ascanded by Ms. Schnebel, to c�pen the public hearing. UPOA A VOICE VOT&� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMADT HARRIS DFCLARED Tf� FUBLIC AEARIDTG OPFN A�' 7: 53 P. M. Mr. Boudaan atated that this rras aaother propoaal for the old Matro 5� etation. �. Oqulat ast�d what had happenefl to the eiga c�aqy tYu�t vae there. Mr. Boaxdn�n atated tLat the eisn c�opqny Lad pullod out after they rscsivod epproval tYom City Council. idr. Basrarar► stated that tluoo peopls swpair and vork on gae p�pe. Mr. Baardssn stst�d tM3*-�+er� loolcina at the some ba.ie improvaient■ thry had diseussed wi.th the ei� ce�panp•. Tluy wers p]anning aai doing lanascaB�B � curbiag in tha ir�t nr�a, and th�re vould be a boax�d-on-bonr8 screoaing lencs in the baek arsa. Thera wcnl�i be so�e outside etorAgY o2 eqaipaent and gas pt�s. Mr. Bt�at'3�n polsitod out that the 1,�Wd- aeaging and eurbing and gr�.n area in froat vill bo a geaeral inq+rovament of the area� aad vould be tiad in with the landscaping of the.St�adard'Stattoa neat da�pa: ylr. Steven Asnson, 12U57 Duke Drive N.E. camQ forWard ond rQad the follovin8 lett�rt "Ninneeata Petrole� vas forae� in l�qy of 1975. !�linne�ot4 Petraleum is basieaL�y a aerviue orgauisation w�ich doee wcrrk Yor varioua aoupaniae a� i�ividuals who use p�troleus pralucts. Sa�ee oi the services ve provida include private iwlin8 systss, sueh as tl�e ont ve are present]y doing at Losbert L�ber in Fridl�. We aleo do inatallation at apartmant coa�plexee Por theSr secondary ha4ting eyet�as, vhiah ie uruall,y fuel oil. Haaever� moet oi our Qu�ta�ers art oQrvice s#aations. The services vhieh ve provide inalufle rapair of pu�ps vhich people nqy have raa into fram tiae to tiw, eqnipawt bxvakdovna, we do u�erground tsnk and futl system inetalletiona, va do piping, hoiat installatiaase and lubrication syretau. Moet of our work is do�e avqY ira4 ahe�p loaatian, hove�er ve do need a ehop vith adeqeaata outside etorage tor bulky ittu sueh aa oir aoipreea�s, hoieta, Pumpa� misaell�a�ous equipsent� and t}wir own equip�meat." Mr. Hanaon statad tLat he felt they vould bo an aeset to the City oF Fridley a� vould try to kosp the progerty in a very tidq �wd atat organisetion and keep it pl�asing to everybody ooncernafl. Mr. Ftxrrie aek�d if the outaifle atoreg� asea vould be vaed baeiaally for p�s in line Yor rs�pair, or if thsy wre g�ing to store tanks back there or vhe�t. Mr. HaneQU etq�ad they hav4 an air com�reasor and jack haswr which they rrould store � tiu side. Thay also ho�e several E-vh�slad trailsra thsy use for hauling equipnQat. The pw�ps Lh�y vould ba storiag vonld be psmps they are h�ldinq for cueta.era� or pumps vaitixig it�r repair, and oaaasiaral�p aev pumpa. Mr. Hanaon atnted tha3r �rere goiug to iastall a feace that would be 6 to 7 feet high, to kerp werything belwr �ye level� adi wuld be a fenee you cavl.8n�t see through, beaAUe� they would iike t� keep paople arqy fram th�ee th�nge. i �, e � �°- � ia+, r e� w r:�� : Mr. Hsrrie sRkod if they wou18 be storing coataiaers of any kind. Mr. Hansoa stated they vould possibly be etortn8 55 s+�11c�o anas for hoist oil and sator oil. They vc+uld want to lceep the s�ergrowid rtorage tanke that are preaeat]y tlure for fueling thsir uwn truaks, and meke uee of them, eo they would not have a�r- thinj� that 8angeroue above grrnmd. 1�. Lqngenfeld astsd if thsre vould be Trelding on ths premisas. Mr. Hanean stated that they occasional�y do aainor rralding, and do have nn arc weldar� but would uee it very saldam. Usuel�y they vould do the welding on ths job, avq}* Yrc3m th. shop. Most of the srork would be done at the custaoers place, rather than oa the yremisea. Mr. Oquiet aek.d if they voul8 have a paint booth, to paint the pumps vhen they repair thw, Mr. Honeon stata8 they usuea].ly doa�t do aqy painting� other tban �tith a spray can. Ms. Schnabol aaked har thq vould uae the building, if they would bs etoring any vehicslea in thert. Mr. Hawaon statsd thsy would have the hoist in there, and that they do their orm main- t�aana. on tiuir ovn trucks, and xou]A use it for that. Also they vould stors perts aad mintan�uae type itena, euah as pvep has8les� etc., in the eervics bqy to the north. Al�o, in the aouth portion of the building, in edditica to repairing their oim trucks, thqy irould aet up a shop to repair aqything that got 8as4ged� such pramps �i¢h �nre run it+to. Ids. 8ohnabel ask�d hosr eoon they vould etart operating atter they rectived complete spPr�vai� an�l hoa eoon they �rould start eonatructiari oY the acrseaing fenae. Mr. Hanam aLated he vovl.d move into th� facility as sooa ae possibls� and ae far as tho fence� he s+asn't sure what the frost situation *rets. Mr. Haaeon stated tbat they had a tiaetable they v�ovld follov xhich included removing the 4 lighta in Yront� re- aov� the c4ner•te eiga in the bovlevard, reaove the busper guaxde on th4 exiating islands, talce cara of the con¢rete ia ircnt �o they could glov, and so no on• wou18 at� Sa there. He would like to get the feace up thia ysar if the Yrost wasn't too bad, aad wae lcwking at 1978 to get thoaa thinge dons� aud wuld iaatall th. green ar�a in the iromt ia the epring of 1979• Also the,y rtould be Pixing up an office area. Mo. Sahnabel etated ehe could vnderatand the bardehips ot putting up a fence ia the vint�r, but vas concerned about the gas puaps affi such vhich would be etored outeide end vould ereate an un-sight�y aituation for the reaidents adjacent to the property, and felt the resid�nts vouldn�t lilu it. Mr. &qnson stataA he would like to get tku fsnce up before they etarted storing a�}- thiag out�ide, and if thqr couldn�t get the vhole fenee up, mqybe they could at lesat gtt the 6aok part up. Mr. Boardmsn otat�d that he kia8 diaeusae3 they irith ?Ir. Hanaon snd tuld him it vauld probably be a cas�ditioa tlut the fence be put up sa aoan as possible. Mr. Boax�men slco ncrtad that Mr. Haason had a �ack hs�er, which vou].d help. .t�� e�� ° � �:r� n �I �:il� +�: Ma. 8¢hnabel ncted that Mr. Heaeoa xas presently locat�d ia Mi.nneapolis, end s�ksd if they Would be co■biaing all their facilitita into this oae location. Mr. Bsnson stated that they vould. Mr. Langenfeld aalccad if tRr. Boardsan oP Mr. Henson had nade the liet on gags 20 of the ogenda. Mr. Hanaon etat�d he had �de the liat en8 aoted that the fenee would be bosrd, not chaln link. Mr. Oquiet nated that No. 8 on the list �ntioaod etorage of solvsnt. Mr. Boardma stated thst thry had three tanke undergroimd a�i vould use aae far heating oil, one for the storage of eolvaat� and one for gasci].ine far their own vehicles. 19r. LanganYeld statad that tho Co�rai�l-Iuduetrial Purchase Agreeaeat atated the oPfer rrould be aull aad void if the b�er did not secegt the property "ae-is", ete. and irevld lik� to inow if tsr. Hansam had accept�i tYw propsrty "ae-ie". Mr. Hanooa etated there vas an attachwnt vith e�artinQencee r•garding the heating syst�, Bound eon�truction, and approval of tho Spee].al Uee P�rffit� etc. bh�. I,��n!'�1,4 a�1c�d if thpr fouad a tank lsaking, did they report it to the Pollution Coaitral. �lr. Hanes�+ statad they do deal �+i.th the PCA and are obligated to notify thQm iY a cus- taar even suepecte a loslc. MOTIO� by Mr. I.angenfeld� second.d by Mr. Oquiat to close the public hearing. I)POlt A VOIC& VOTB� ALL Vt1TING AYS, CHAIRMAN HARRI$ DECiARED THE PUBLIC H6ARING CLOSED AT 8:16 P.M. Me. Schaabel ststed that at the tiae of the last roquost on thie propQrty, there were eeveral neighb�ra vho case end vere conceraed about scrsening, and 2F Mr. Haaeon *rere villing to ecreen the rear propertq line i�ediately, either prior to atart oP opara- ti� or at tiu time operation bsgias, ehe srould l�ve ao objoction. Mr. Bonrdesn stat�l that if they eould get thQ rear scr.tned� they should be able to ecreen all of it aixl fo2t a coadition ehould be that thry screen all of it i�ediate],y. MOTION by Ms. 3ehnsbel� eeconded 6q Mr. uist, to reca�end to Council approval of the rsqueat for a Special Uae Perait, SP- 8-13, by Steven Haneou, D/S/A Minnesota Petreleum 3ervice: F'er Sectioa 205.101, 3, 0, of the Fridley Code, to allow eales and service for th� insta].lation of service etation equipmQnt on Lots 20, 21, amd 22, Blxk 13, Hamiltoa'e Addition to Mechanieaville, tYw oame being 5333 �versity Ave. PIE. irith tiu �tipulation tLat solid scraening fence b� erected i�esdietely on the outeide atoragQ area, aud slso the atipulation that landscsping be completed in the Spring and be coordinated w�d eeoq>ntible vith the landseaping of Standard Oil on the south eide. PLANNING COM+IIS$ION MEE'PING, DE�CSMBER 6, 1978 PAGE 6 Mr. I�ngQnfeld stated that hs vovld like to co�nd Mr. Hanson for his prasentation� and felt that if hie basinees vas ae good as hie prasentaticm� he vould be en aeeet to tYu Citq. UPON A VOICE VOT&� ALL VOTIP� AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE M(nION CARRIED UNANII+�USLY. 4. LO'P SPLIT UE3P, L.S. �78-05 BY DAN-LAN DEVEIAPMENT C(�tPO[tATION: Split oPf � e ut��,o�nd a�dd�t�i�o �� aifin�loc& 1�3.lton� s Addition to Machaniceville, ior the gurpoee of moving a d�uble bungalow on the c�mbined area, located juet south oP 5430 sth StrQet N.E. Mr. Boardmen ateted that this vas loeated on 5th Street juet south of the property they recently approvad for a tri-plex. Nhen that requsst weut to Council leat Mondqy, they inforned Council that they had pieked up bot 4, as r�ca�ended by Planning. This lot split wonld be on Lat 6 for the developa nt of a duplex. The dupl�c wou].8 be built eouth of the single famil,y houee which vaa on Lot 5 ana Lot 6. With this lot eplit, there �+ae a variance going through presently. The variauca vould be on the Appeals Caamieei� agenda on December 26. They would need a variance on lot area and aleo e variance for setback distance irom the aiagls family hous�. If they approvad the lat aplit at this time, it eould be aubject to the variaace approval by the Board oP Appesle. T'he reason it rras co�ing up at two different tiae like thia wae that thsy rsceived an attorneya determination on the lot aplit, a� his determination xas that oa lot splits, variaacea ehould be separate because vArianees require public hearings and lot splita do not. l�r. AArris aaked wt�t the eituntion vrss with the garage oa Lot 5. Mr. B�ar�nnan statad that the garaga was being mov�d to thQ baek of Lat 5 and would be totaly on Lot 5. The split would bs righ8 doim ths middle oF Lat 6. Mr. FiArrie aeked if those rrere all 40 foot lote. Mr. Boqrd�an etated they wre and the split wotilld give them two 60 fart building eites� at 100 feet d�ep. Mr. Harlon King, 5430 5th Street �.E., Oa� forvard and etated he lives in the single house. Mr. Kiag stetc8 that tiuxw �+ae a doublt bungalor+ in Minneqpolie that muat be toved bteause oY a high�rey, and they srould like to b�* it aid move it in� but they have not yet purahased it aad vere not eur� they could get it. If th�y could not purci�sae this particular duplex� th�y vould build a double bungalow oa the lot. Mr. Hsrris ststaci if thoy did nav� the double bungalow ia� upon moving it in, the� �+ou18 have to �tt all the requirementa cd the City Code, aad ehould also check into the requireaieats of the Energy Code� aad mnke sure it meete the Eaergy Code. Mr. Bc�rIIaaa stated thst the City'a inepector voud.d have to lo0k at it bePore they moved it in and aleo aftor they moved it in. Mr. Harris etated he brought this up becauee it eould effect the aegotiations concerning the purchace of the 8ouble bungalo►r. PLANNZNG CO!lQ88IE)N MEETIi�. DECEI��RR 6, 1978 - PAGE 7 Mr. Don Couture, 2518 Jackson 3treet N.E., ask�d if tiu lot split rrsre approvsd and they aould not purchaae ths double bungala►, and d�cided to build iri.th the eawe dimenelans qnd all, rrould it be a problem. Mr. Harrie statad it vould �tot if they ha8 the variances And met thea. Mr. BorxrBaqa etaL�d thia area waa son�d R-3, so tha soning vas cora.et and poiat�d out tLat the atructure aurrounding thie proparty was four•plexes snd multipla fanily uaita. Mr. Coutnre pointed crut that thty had the only frpat drivevqy ia tht bloak� an8 when the gatage gtte tsirn�C around, thQy would ba ueing the alley, eo thare would then be no drivwqys in the front. Nr. Boardmpen askod haw uld the atructure vas that they �rsr� pleaning to mwe ia. ldr. Cotttur� stated it Waa 12 yaars old snd �ras atucco vith a brick frottt. Mr. Harris ackad if they vovl.d nead aripr eae�nte. Mr, B�srd'an statad lu had talked to C�pBo, and aa far as he kntw, thay neadod no aae�senta. A�. Schnab�l atated that she felt this proposal vould be very caspAtibla with the naighborhood. 2'iu on�y eingle Pemily dtirelling belong�d to the petitioaer� a� the :- _-- other ��rue�ur�s-vere-multiple."family-unite:.,In terne of visual iapac!+ls, a double bungalar would be good on that lot. Ml3TI0N by Mr. I.engcnfeld, seconded by Ms. Schnabel, to recamand to Council apprmal �tfi-e Lot Split request, L.s. �78-05, by Dan-Lnn D�v�la�paent Corparation: Split off the South ha2f of Lot 6� and add it to Lot 7, sll ia Block 11, Haal2ton'e Additioa to I�echanieevillt, for the purpoae of 'oving a double �ungalw on the combinsd areai lo- cated juet souph oi 5�30 5�h street 1�.E. vith tho stipulati� that the variance r�questa are approv�d by tlu Bonxd crP Appeals, a� also th� stipulatian that the building meets the City of Fridl�y�a Building a�i Energy Cod�s. UPON A VOICE VOT�� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAH HARRIS DBCLARFFD THE 1�TION CARRIED -: 5. CONrINUED• 2�ANDiAK OF AGR�Pfl': Mr. Storla noted that this item hitd been tabled. 6. i ur u y� , r-, � � � �• i� Mr. Boardmn atsl�d that C�uncil wo�d probably bs s�lectinQ a conaultwnt st thsir Deeambar 18th m�eting, Aad ri.�ht nev the City bi�aaQer'e offico waa in tha procesa oY an ext�aive review of the propoaitla. Mr. Harria aakad if they had raceiv�tl a� swspona� from the lasal busin�as c�ou�mity or the Ckss�ber oi Cc+�srce r�garding th3e propooal. Mr. Boordmm etaled he had nrt heard a� r�eponsa as y�t, and statad that nt the m�eting vhere the c�eultants 'ad� thcir proposqla� ab�iLt 70� of the landrnmers �nre repreeeated qnd he had talkad to aau of thea after thQ aotti,ng ond Fr.d Lsvi waa v�ry intereeted in the prvposale. PLAxan� Ccx�ssi6a� �r�t�, nEC�nt 6, 1978 - PAGB 8 Nr. Peterean etated tLat in talkiag to buaintasn�n in the ca�uaity vho werQ nsideat tw�pqyere, it had besn indicat�8 to hi= that thay felt the big puah Yor hiring a cameult4nt vas bscauee the Staff and prof�ssionals in City goveranent eere looking for �uetification for plans that the,y wu].d 21te to tats place in downtavn Fridl�y. Mr. BoarCman atat�d that they hed received a lctter from the Chamber of Co�erce aaking thas t� lock into this, but there vaa ao push froa Staff. Mr. BonrBsan iadicat�l t}ut StafP vould like to eee eaeiething tupp�n as far as dev�lcrpaent go.e, but thsy do not have d�v�lopsent plane aad wuld not be putting develop�nt p]sn� tcgethtr. 'Pheir intent oa tha vhole proposal and th� ire�y thay xrote tht whule propoaal wsa that they wer� lookiag for private iaitiative vith th� poasibilitq of packaging land or mskir�g land �wilable Por development. At th�t point in tiaw, a�y development propoeale thst wo�ld caae in vwld be �udged on t}�ir ovn merit by the City Council swd the prapoaale per se� vould howe to ccme irm private developera� and rrw]d not be propos�, by the City Staff for privats dfvelopment. Nr. L.agu�foll ctat�d that he thought this b�gan because of the land north of City Hall. llr, Bootdaon atatad tlutt it Led atart•d �rhen the City Cwncil �+sa discuseing irhether or aot to purahaoe tLat praperty and there �re diseuasians with the Chanber of Co�res 4t ttut tim�, and also With the busin�so ovnere in tho drnmtovn ores. Ther� trere a lat of differeut id•as as to wLat to do vith the l.and arailable and at that point in time� t?u CLasber of Ccfmtree requested the,y look into the poseibility of hiring a coneultant. At that point in tiae� Cwnci2 stat�d they vauld put so muah a�ey iuto a canaultawts r�port if thsy vad a rtopoase from saw of the buainese organizations. After the,t� tho emeultants liets wrs put together and sent out. I�lr. P�tereon etatad tLsC the doRmtown area, vnl�se fiheg eould dc sauthing vlth HighwQy 110. 47� loake to hi.m that they have ecme vsry difficult tisss ah�ad 3ust because of the probl� oi the Higvwqy in terms of tying it togethsr. Mr. Petersca� aleo stated that if the Chwber of Cw�erce and the adjaaeat propesty vaners ven eo iatereated� wby don't tLeg do lYk� they did aith ths lfet SEadivm, ia other vorda, 1P they vant City tex moaey spent on ceosultsnts, thpr shoul,d cme up �rith part of it� beeause they are tlu ones who wuld bwKit. Mr. Peters� etat�d that he felt vsry fev pecple �rould benefit Prom this atudy� ather ��a� the bneinesa ownera ia the area at downtrnm. Dlr. Boardmsn stated be Yelt th�t tku City woulA also benefit beeauee the City vaa sitting with a lot of screo thet �rere tmd�veloped or under-dev�le�ped. This pxroperty is just sittiag vacent and probably would rewain vaeant far a lcmg period of tise and the type al development that might come out oY there mny aot be the type of develo�ment that would be beneiiciel to the City. If the City, vith the support of the Chamber oY G,�erce a�d the bueiaesemen in the ares aan put together paekeges to spark development, wi�y aot7 Mr. Petorson atated tLat he etill felt that the groyerty airners wouid be the ames to benefit and they should ca� up with some money end not take it out oi the City t�c naney vhich ie basical�jr re�id.nte. Mr. Peteraon atated he wae not evre this iraa a legitimate function of City govern�ent. Nr. LtmgenYtld statsd that he had not,d that throughout the documsnts he had noted that they vould ulilize t�uc increatnt finanMng mechanism end would like an explanation of that teru. Mr. Boardman etatad that tex increment financing was that it takes property that is pre- sently prmperty that is at a lwer tax bese� aad thrwgh the selling of bonds thqy acquire the prctperty� develop the property to s higher tax level and the differenco betveen the two tax levels p�ys oYf tho boads, and then over a period ot' years or what they asll inerements, thoee bonds are psid a�P with tha diPfsreaces in taxes snd at tbat poifft in time, ths City vo�ld be getting a h1$h!r tau level out of the prvperty. �" �; I�1 ' f( I�I 1 s �1 I: BI' • • i ' H � Mr, l',angenield ststed that it souaded speaulatim to hia. Mr. Boardmsn stated thls tirsa used rather heavi�y all mrar the State. Ms. 3ehaab�l esked if that eae done by re-aoaiag the grap�rty or by improving the PraPe�Y • Mr. Boardmen stst•d it eaa done by the Aoueing and Radevelo�gment Authority acquiring the property through bomde, they then mske the prcperty available for development at X nurber of dollare� and when the buildinge are aonatructad or cao�letad, they go oa the tax rolls at a higher level� snd the tifferencee in taxss from before e� aPter the development ie What they use to pqy oYf the bmds. So 1t is beaieally property laprcv�at. Mr. Oquist etateel he had kuard discuseions to the eYfeet that it woulein't be worth doing saything to dovntovn Fridley because aP the three mejor ahopping centers, North- tv�m, Apache, and Brookdale. Idr. Iietrria state8 it could be e caabination of local ehopping, offices and reeidentiai. Mr. Oquiet aeked who vould pey for tho devalcpm�nt. Mr. BoarBman stated private developere wovlfl pe�r far it. Mr. Boa:daan etsted that thie vsa s stegad developmwt type of proposal. �3t e I wu7.8 be m reviesi of the a�arkets anslyeis, review oi soil, review of sewar aad water loaations throughout the srea. �St e _I�I vould be to ana]yze an-eccmo�ic feasibility stuQy, to see if it vould ba fe4sible �the City� through taz inarment snd other financial or fanding progra�s� to put tc�gether packeg�s oY land. �e IZI s+�ould be a 8evelopmeent proepoct�s whers they t+ou].d put togethsr proepectus� to aerr� ou�to developera eo they could have development preposale coming back to the City at the type of doLLars they xould be looking for� fcu' tkle psekiges. ifr. Oquist aeke8 if thaq had aLy gvaraatee fram the sxisting land mmers and bueineasmen� that vhiohever consultant th•y ¢hcwse, the,y vill go slo�ng vith it and be �rilling to dewlop the arta. Air. Boardman atated the consultants would Work v.ry close�y with the ].and wnore and buein�samen, hopeYul.�y organi�e s�e kiad of ]and devalop�eat program vith them. Mr. Oquiet stated it shoralA came fraa the busines�rn and land amere, not fram the City, in order to inaure they vill bxck it aaee they ar� there. Mr. Petereon stated he Pelt it xas net being developed at proeent because it obviouely v�ould nat be econe�ical�y Yeasible uniees the City csee in and baile out the present prcrperty ovners �rith tax dollar�, and vhat they are actus].ly doing was subsidiziag existing graperty vrmera to gtt the property to sell it to another developer at a larer thaa realistia coet and that doean't a8d up to him Lhrt they ahould be doing this xith tax dollare. 'I' e,, i� ,.: ° ��. ..i�l 1 5 51 �:1�• •: e AIr. Bpsxdmsn statsS they would meke that money up vith the amc�w�t of teses they vou].d get out oY the property a!'t�r it was developed. Mr. Iangenfeld statad that frem the meetiag the other aight Where this wss discussed, he uc�derstood that if Phsse I shmred it was not econcaically feaeible� it would e� tht whole thing, and also the peaple he had talksd to about this felt that the msjor ehopping ceaters r�ere s�thering the businesses economieally in Fridley and becauae of thAt thoy ec�uld en8 up with th3s type of stvdy aooner or later. Mr. Langeafeld sCated he felt there wsa an eca�ic deterioration going on right now in the City of Fridiey, and thQy vould have to act to revitilize tlu wkwle e�onoo�. Mr. Harris etated they had tried private developmeat in the area and it didn't work. It appears to him that they need lead�rship and the c�sultants would provi8s that. Tbe idea behi.nd the consultsnts was to have them tell the City whst traet theyr ehovld b� on. They reeao�ended at the meeting with Council, that they etage thie c�eultante busi.a�as in fowr atages Which irould coinciSe with the coaeultanta' phases. After each pLase� the City vculd receive a regort, eaa]yze it �nd then decide if they shn�1 80 ou to ths n�et pLase. Mr. Harria etated thet one of the things that b�tkured him about the propossla vae t}ut the languagt regar8ing prices *rne kind of loosa. If you added up the tep end of all their ranges, it added up to $42,000. An�ther thing that botherod him vras thnt the propoasle implied that in order to entice a private developar in hert� they vou1Q hsve to give awa�y eamething. It vea no�t in there in xritiag, but wes implied. Mr. Boardnan etated that he felt they meant that the City vould have to provide incentiv.� ueing aome of the financial toole a*railable to them to encourags dev�l�+ment. If they use taa dollare to eneourage develop�at, they vould get tax dollar� out of it. Mr. Psterson atated he couldn't see what they w�uld put in to generato tax iollars, if it waan�t ca�eraial. bir. Bonreiman stated they could, for instance, put in a six etory building with offiees, reeidente, and lcnrer ea�ercial. Ah�. Petersa� statod that could be done by changing aoning. Mr. Laageni�ld statafl thet they should contact eooe of the other citias tbat have gona through this. In the eity of Faribault, for instancQ, he was avare that it didn`t trork to have conaultants plan develOpment. Mr. Boordmsn atated they vere preaent�y checking vith all tlu other citits theee can- aultants have worksd for. Ma. 6ahnAbel aak�d hrnr ma�+ acrse of Lnd they trera talTcing about in the study. Mr. Bcfaraman etated that had tctimat�d that the emount of ].aed that cou18 be �pea Yor 8welop�nt rraa from 30 to 40 acns. l�fo. Schnabel otat.d tbat ehe `res not recw�ending th.y do it{ �but it seomed to her that $42,00� wsa not ■ lot of money vhan they were talking ab�ut 4o acrss. PLA11B1II� CAI3�ffSBIUN t�E'PING, DECEi�&R 6, 1978 - PAGE 11 Ma. Stshnabal ask�'L if the Chamber oY Ca�erct or the busineearn involved had besn approached to aame up xith sooe of the $onsy. Mr. Boare9maa etatai� to the beot oP hie knrnrladQe, they had not. 1�ION by Mr. Pa�reon� e•eondad by Ma. Schaabel to reco�nd to Council that they pro- csad with a coneultnnt, but that they praceed with either rpeelal aasesaa�nt of the prop.rty oinaore in the ar�a or vith n cooperative rinane� or a/3raa - 1�3rd. a/3rae of ta�c dallars an8 1/3� fromi the property rnmers in tho araa to ps�y for it. Ms. Sehnabel etatsd an att�mpt ehonld be med� to try to encourage the bucinees c�unity in th� ar�a to became involved ia a financial va,y. UPOA A VOICB VOTE� ALL VOTI1� AY8' CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARF.D TEiB l+�TION CARRIED tINANIM0U6LY. Mr. Harrie atatad hQ felt thcy ahould sslect the least sxpenaive coneultant, Profeesional Plaaning and Dw�elo�snt, becauee Phase I a� PY�ase II xould be the same from any of the tht� conaultants. Profeasionel Plenning and Development wuld coet $15�500. MOTIOBT=by-Mr.-Storla, sac�ncled by Mr. Oquiet to reco�� to Council that they select Profeeaional Planning a� iaevelop�e�. Mr. Langtnfeld ctated he r»uld like to hear vhat othQr citiee that have used this c�n- sultant ha8 to eay. Iie YQlt Profeesional Planning and Development's preaentation was too technical and it xas difficult to understand what he �ae saying. Ma. Schnabol stated that ProEeasional Planning snd DwQlopmment te�a to lean very heavi7y tasrard government financing with a lot of the projtete fi�hey had dlecuesecS, more so thsn the other tvo. Not having hsard the actual proposiils mede by tl�e pQOple involved vrith this� ahe vould vote againet the moti�n becauee eh� did aot feel qualified at this point to go s�long with this racaommendation. Mr. BoarB�an stat�d tLat all of tie coneultants w�vld have to use somo kind of tax incre- ment or Pa8.ra1 i'unding. Mr. Petereon atateri he felt so�what like Ms. Schnobel� but having read the propoeals, ha felt Profosaiaa�al. Planning and Develop�at vras more realistic se to vhere the money vae caming from bha� the other two. Mr. HarriQ stateS he vrae dieappointafl rrith t2ie responao thoy received� in rocaiving pro- poaals fraa on�y three. Aleo ho folt the coneultante who.did eubmit proposals c�uld have 8oaa �re ground wrk. Mr. Harris atatsd he folt thay did not have a good faol as t� vhat the City r+as looking Por� but mqybe it vesn't vuusual at this poiat. Mr. Boardnsn stated that Professional Planning and Devtlop�nt had puched fpr involvement of the dovntown business ec>�unity. Mr. Langenfeld atat�d that he felt more etudy ehould be dwe� an8 wuld not vote for the notion Ma. Schnebel stated ahe waan�t againet it, but didn�t fsal preparad to seleet one plan over the ather. UPON A VOICE VOS'E� MR. HARRIS� MR. PETERSON, MR. OQUISR'� 1�&i. ST(HtLA VOTING AYE� APID MS. SCHNiA$EL AND MR. LANGENF'ELD VOTI1� NAY� GHAIItMAN AARRIS DECLARID THE MOTION CARRIED 4 TO2. PLJINNII� COM[+II38IOR ��ETING DECEMBgt 6, 1978 - PAGE 12 7, RBCgIVL� Cc3�tRAfIMITSC D�IAPMEN'P C�AffSSIOx t+IIxtTrSS: NOV_EPIBER 14, 1978: MOTIiN by Mr. Oquist, eeconded by Me. Schnab.l, to receive the November 14, 1978, �i�unity Dsvslopmant Co�ission minutes. Mr. Oquiat ststed th�y had spent the �rLols time going through the z�ning changes, and hopsd to finish it oYf aext time. UPOA A VOICE VOT&� ALL VOTII� AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARID Tf� 1YSOTION CARRIED S. R�CEIVE EI�RGY PROJSCP CONfl�lITR'EE MINUrES: AOVEI��R 15, 1978: MOTIOA by l�h�. Laageaf.ld, soconde8 by Mr. Storla, to receive the Novec�er 15, 1978, n�r�r Projoct Camittee minut•s. l�h�. Harria atatad thoy had a good turn.out and at the next meeting thty wuld wlect a chnirman. He would nat be abla to attend the noxt meeting and sekoci Mr. Lsngenfeld to ��ad it. Mr. Boardman stated.thei NSP and MiAnegas�o vrould have reeource psople at the next sseting and thay vou]d also have resource people attend the meetinge regu3arly. Mr. I,ongeafsld asked Mr. Harris ii he was open Yor ao�ination to chair the Co�ittee. Mr. Harris statsd hs vould do whetever the Ca�ittee wsnted him to do. UPt)N A VOICB VOTE� ALL VO'PIHG AYE� CHAIRMAN AARRI3 DSCLARED T$E MOTIOH CARRIED UNANII�[JSLY. 9. RTsCEIVE APPEAIS C�SSION MIN[1i�3: SPECIAL MEL�`PING, NOVE4BER 28� 1978: MOTI01� by Ms. Schnabel, es¢�nded by Mr. Peterson, to receive the November 28, 1978, �e Ca�iesion ainutea. Afa. Schnsbtl steted_they were still_worktn� on the zcrning oxdisancer ficit xould not have aaother special �eting. Page 1 refers to their concern far definitions for "Femi�y" a� "Ocauprncy Linit" a�i had receiv.d a copy of Minneapalis� housing aode end their definiti� of "Faioily" va4_.brisfly,they coneider family to be pQrsone who are relat� by bloe�d, mrrlagR, a�optiau, etc., a� far thet there ie ae limit ai ths numb@r of persone pen c�rueehold. People who are non-related are lisited to 5 people p�r,hvu�sbo2�--= =-- ia �xaeas of parents and ehildren if it is a foater ho� or that t�rpe oY thing. Mr. LangenPeld asked if Mr. Bo4rflman wuld broaden himaelf regarding his com�snt on pag� l� ths ].ast paragraph� regarding periodic review aP Special Uae Permits. Mr. Beardman lu�d stated tl�t periodic review would areato-a;a lot oP extra pap�r work �d vt►vlda't accoapliah muh. It rroul8 be better to haudle it on a complaint basis. Mr. Boardman stqted that vea what hs wante8 to eay� and didn't eee the productiveness of pariodic rev3ew. Mr. ].pngenfQld aekod if Mr. Boardman had found a�ything regsrding atate codaa on building pQrmite. 1�. Baexdnan e{ated he hadn't looked iuto it yot. SA�OIi A VOICE VMPE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRb1AN NARRIB DSCLAItED Ti� MOTION CARRIED U1QANlM :! t i, I 1"C 1� I;A 1;F " IS JI' • • i iQ. ar� Basi�%s: A. Mr. Petersrn stated thet the Parks and Recreatiaai Camiesion Lad mst on Ii�vember 27� but the aiaut�e wersn't lure yet. B. Alr. Boerdnan statefl ths�t had made application Yor H41D bonue money Yor acquiaition of sub-etA�ard unita Por development Yor lo� mortgag� �r �ub-Yinaneial m�rtgage rate housing for lw and moderate incame large families. At thia time w have mauie a liet oY tRntetive units that could be acquired. We are n�t looking at cond�inums� but actual acquisition of the propertios with negot3�ticns-going on presentl,y. It lwks : 11ke ve wu7.d be sligible foz $32,000 for aaquiiitiom. C. Tkur� atv two LAWCOA projeeta vhich they have subnitted to Metro Council City Planaing Ageacy. They rankad No. 3� c�nstruction of a nature center building at l�oath Park for �250�p00, $180�000 etats and federal mouiee, and $63,000 local nonies. We ranked Ao. 5 irJ.th the acquieition ef the Seare property and are in the negutiating process at thi� point in time� with Bob Shore. D. Mr. PQtereon auggastad that they con"sider cancelliag the December 20 meeting of the P].Annfng Ca�isaion. Mr. Bptrclsan �rac nat sure ax�tthing had bsen scheduled. 1�2ION by Mr. Peteroon, s`conded by Mr. Oquiet to eancel the IIecQmber 20, 1978 eoeeting � Planniag Ca�iasion. UP�N A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CANIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED T� MOTION CARRIED WiA�IId�i�I.Y. IdDTION by Mr. Langenfeld, aecaoded 6y Mr. Peteraon to adjourn tha DecQmber 6, 1978 mo�et��ag of the Pianniag �ooaioeion. UPOP A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DSCLARED TAE MEETSI+� ADJOLH�I�D AT 10:10 P.M. R�speatYul]y Submitted: / _/_ i �i�� f:i4�;iTf-y�a[ •�T•1�ifii�"�Gt'i:^.3�4TSS9