Loading...
PL 05/08/1985 - 6850PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 8, 1985 -- Page 2 11. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSJON MINUTES OF MARCH 26, 1985 12, RECEIVE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL , 98 See Motion to City Gouncil on Paqe 6 �3, RECEIVE ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 2, 1985 14. RECEIUE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIpN MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1985 15. RECEIVE COMMUNITY DEUELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 985 See Motion to City Council on Page 2 16. RECEIUE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 9, 1985 17. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 1485 ig; RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 23, 1985 19. OTHER BUSINE55: AD�OURNMENT: PAGES BLUE GREEN LILAC SALMON PINK YELLQW BLUE YELLOW CITy OF FRIDLEY PLANNING CflMIMI55I0N MEETIN6, APRIL 3, 1985 CALL TO OR�ER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the April 3, 1985, Planning Comrnission meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Me�bers Present Members A�sent Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Mr, Minton, Ms. Gabe1, Mr, Nielsen, Mr, 5aba, Mr, Kondrick None Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator John Ftora� Public Works Director Dennis Schneider, City Councilman Gerald Johnson, 712 River Lane, Anoka Renae Hanson, Community Options Ltd, Diane M. 011endick Wright, Comnunity Dptions Ltd. ` Robert Anderson, 6600 Oakley St. N.E. Arnold M, Kuhnly, 6747 Washington St. N.E. Ruth Dunn, Fridley Focus See attached lists APPROVAL QF FEBRUARY 27, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSIfIN MINUTES: NOTION BY XR. MINTON, SECONDED BY MR, NIETSEN, TD APPROI�E' THF. FEB. 17� 1985, PLANA'ING COXHISSIOti MINUTES AS WRZTTEN, UPO�Y A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRWONAN SCHNAAEL DECLARED THE MO^_'SON CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. 1. RESCHE(IULED FROM MARCN 20, 1985. AT PET EST: PUBLIC HEAR2Nr,; Rezone rrom rc-i �one ramiiy aweiii�g) to c-z (genera� business), Lot b, Black 5, and Outlot 1, Donnay's Lakev4ew Manor, to be used for commercial development, generally located at 5698 West Moore Lake Drive N.E. Item continued until later in the a9enda because of related meetinq taking place in Community Roan I. 2, PUR4IC HEARING: REQUEST FQR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP N85-01, C4F41UNITY , ., �: er ection ., ,, o t e r�dley � y o e, to a ow u e es9dential Mentai Nealth Program for Anoka County on Lot 1 and 2, Block 14, Hamilton's Add;�ion to Mecbanicsville, the same being 5378-5384- 5th Street N.E. XOTZOh' BY XR, OQUIST� SECDNDED BY HR, KONDRICK� TD OPEN TXE PUBLZC NEARING ON SP N85—QI BY RAtdA£ XANSDN. UPON A VOZCE YOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCNNFu3EL DECLARED THE PL'BiiC IfEARZNG OpEN AT 7:37 P,!!. PLANNING COMMISSION PoEETING, APRII 3, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated this proposal was for a speciai use permit for a comnunity- based mental health facility. This proposect facility will have 14 residents. The location of the pr000sed facilitv is on the corner of 54th Ave. and 5th St., just south of I-694 and east af Highway 47, The zoning is R-3 multiple family. The nearest R-1 toning is to the easY on 6th St. Mr. Robinson stated the facility was a four-unit complex with four side-by-side units, each having three levels. The lower level consisted of four garages, laundry, utility, and storage. The main level or street level consisted of living room, kitchen, and eating area--approximately 850 Sq. ft. of living area per unit. City code requires there be a minimum of 650 sq. ft. of livinq area for a two bedroom unit so this was in excess of that requirement. The third level consisted of two bedrooms and one bathroom. Each of the bedrooms has at least 120 sq. ft, which was signficant in that Lhe program requirement for this tyve of facility calls for a minimum of 60 sq, ft. of usable bedroom floor area per occupant. The petitioners are proposing two occupants per bedroom. Mr. Robinson stated the building modifications �roposed will include cutting doorways between each of the units to allow for program supervision. Of the four kitchens, one would remain as a congregate dining area, the others would be used as office space. Stoves, refrigerators, and sinks would be removed from the other three kitchen areas. Mr. Robinson stated that presently there are eight parking stalls--four qaraqes and four hard surface areas. City code requires eiqht stalls so this does meet code, Two stalls are required oer two bedroom unit. He stated the yard was relatively smail and lacks visual appeal. It needed landscaping artd a passive area development which woutd include a security fence. Mr, Robinson stated the program will serve approximately 14 men and women, at ieast 18 yrs. of age, with primary diagnosis of inental illness. Priarity will be given to Anoka County residents. One of the key thoughts here is that the facitity should be locaLed in the peonle's own county so they will be able to maintain existing jobs, family ties, etc. The program category is Category 1 which entails intensive clinical treatment for the residents. Mr. Robinson stated the screening process has been described as thorough to ensure the ciients referred are of no danger to the neighborhood. The clients have been described as withdrawn, insecure, lacking skills which would enable them to have jobs successfully on their own. The concept is to mainstream these individuals into tiving arrangements which would be more 9ndependent. The typical duration of their stay would be 4 months - two years. Mr. Robinson stated this facility wouid be licensed by the Minnesota Depart- ment of Human Services as a Rule 36 facility. It would also be licensed by the Minnesota Department of Health as a supervised living facility. Anoka County will fund the program for approximately 55% of program costs. The balance of 45% will be paid as room and board bv the residents. Mr, Robinson stated the proposal does require a special use permit. Under R-3 zoning code, convalescent fiomes are allowed in residential with a special use permit. PLANNING C(N�IMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr, Robinson stated the proposed staffing for this facility would include an administrator, program director, therapist, counselor, and a nurse. It would include a living skills specialist, a retreation specialist. several mental fiealth workers and a secretary. One of the key provisions of the Rule 35 program is that there would be 24 hr., 7 day a week supervision, 5ome one would always be awake and someone woutd a7ways be on call. Mr. Robinson stated it was also interesting to note the Minnesota State involvement in this type of facility. Recently there has been a force to decentralize the mental health facilities; in other words, to get them out of the core cities and into the suburbs. Presently there are numerous mental health facilities in the process of being establishedin other surburan locations. Mr. Robinson stated the State has enacted special orovisions which inctude the Minnesota Public We7fare Licensing Act which was passed to regulate the Provisio�s of these services and to ensure proper care at these facilities. This A�': was evide�ce af the fact that residential facilities of this type have been maJe a matter of state concern in that municipalities are prohibited from imoosing more restrictive conditions on them than are imposed on ather special uses, unless necessary to protect the health and safety of the facility residents. Mr, Robinson stated that in terms of the fridley special use permit, the special use permit restriction was set up to allow reasonable amount of discretion in determining t�e suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, health, and safety of tfie area, Although not explicitly allowed, this parti- cular use is neither explicitly exciuded and,in general,falls under the cate- gory of a convalescent home which is allowed in R-3 with a special use permit. It was interesting to note that this type of facility would be allowed in C-2 or commercial zoning without a special use permit but would require a 20,OD0 sq. ft. lot area. The proposed lot is slightly over 11,000 sq, ft. Mr. Robi�son stated that in researching the facitity, he tatked to Ms. Marge Wherley. Resident Program Consultant of the Hennepin County Mental Heaith Division, who stated that of the 20+ mental h2alth facilities in the Minneapolis area and the City of Minneapolis specifically, there have been no incidents of assault by a resident on a neighbor. 5he also stated they facilitate over 800 clients a year. Mr. Robinson stated City Staff was recommending the following stipulations if this special use permit is approved: 1. Operation to be reviewed annually with a public hearing for the first two years. 2. Residents with automobiles be restricted to five or 1ess. Rear yard to be fenced with six foot high solid wood fence. This is to be completed prior to occupancy. 4, Petitioner to provide a landscaping nlan and install prior to October 31, 1485. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 3, T985 PAGE 4 5. Proposed Advisory Committee to inc]ude City representatives (i.e, Human Resources Carmission member and/or police Special Operati�ns Division staff} Contingency plan be initiated with Unity Hospitat to cover any emergencies. 7. Facflity will comply wSth a11 State and County rules and laws and be fu17y licensed. 8. Facility will comply with local and State fire codes. 9. Client characteristics will be consistent with petit9oner's contract with Anoka County (i.e. individuals wha do not exhibit behavior that is harmful to themseives or others). 7he peiitioners were in the a�dience. Ms. Diane OlTendick Wright stated she was the President of Community Options, Ltd „ and the proposed owner of the building, She stated she would give a brief review of how CommuniLy Options came to be in the Fridley area in terms of the selection of this site and the type of process they went through in getting the contract with Anoka County. She would also tel7 a little about the needs assessment. She stated Ranae Nanson, also a Board member and Secretary for Comnunity Options, the person who had met with the neighbors and has done most of the community contact,would speak on items regarding program characteristics, etc. Ms. Wright stated she currently owns and onerates a facility in the City of Brooklyn Lenter called Northwest Residence, She has been in residential treatment for the last nine years and in social services for the past eleven years. Her program that will be in Brooklyn Center as of Auril 19 (has been in the City of Minneapolis) has been in operation for about l� years. She stated she has a Master's De9ree in 5ocial Work, has been in mental health for the last four years. Prior to that her residential experience was in children's care and treatment. Ms. Wright stated that in early January, Anoka County had a proposal (reauest for services) that went out to vendors across the 5tate of Minnesota. It was an open bidding process and seven vendors applied, of which Community Options was one. They had to write a program proposal, budget recomnendations, possibilities of sites, etc., and went through a pretty stringent review by Anoka C�unty along with references and ora7 interviews. Ms, Wright stated Community Options was selected as a potential vendor because it was felt they most c]osely met the needs Anoka County wanted to address. Anoka County did do a needs assessment that was quite comprehensive, and there are a number of out-of-county placements because there is no Rule 36 in Anoka County. 5he stated they currently have three Anoka County residents in North- West Residence, so there is definitely a need. At this time, they are the potential vendor, because the County does not act on their contract unt�] the end of April. PLANNING LOMhIS5I0N MEETINf, APRIL 3, 1485 PAGE 5 Ms. Wright stated they started looking for a site and had three real estate agents working with them, They viewed and called about 15 sites throughout Moka County. They had some pretty stiff standards. The facilit� had to be easily accessible to public transportation, They needed 14 beds which did rule out several other four-plexes. A factor in favor of this site was it offered bedrooms on the second level from the living space which was ideal for their programming, So, the proposed site has a lot of good potentials and also it would require a minimal amount of remodeling which was important in starting a program when funding was limited. Ms. Wright stated they had ane neigfiborhood meeting last Thursday evenin�. If things go as they hope,they will not close on the property until after they have received all the permits and have received the contract from Anoka County. They would then give the tenants notice to move and would have probably 2-3 weeks to do the necessary remodeling and tfien accept clients. This would probably mean a timeframe of July or possibly the end of June. Ms. Ranae Hanson stated sfie and Ms. Wright were partners in Communitv Options. and she would be the administrator of the program. She stated she has started and administered two programs with the Willows Convalescent Centers. She started and administered �anus ?reatment Residence in Bloomington and Lhe March House program in Minneapolis, The �anus Treatment Residence was the only long term program in the suburbs. It has been in Bloomington for tFree years. Ms. Hanson stated there will be 14 clients, both men and women, with mental illness diagnosis. They will not be taking any people who are violent or dangew us to others, who are assaultive, chemically dependent, or mentallv retarded. Their clients will be people who are appropriate for conmunity place- ment who can live in the comnunity without any problem, They are not people who should be in the state hospital or conanunity hospital, Right now most of these people are living in other Rule 36 residences outside Anoka County. Some are living in private apartments or with parents. 5ome are also living in foster homes. They witl get some referrals from community hospitals-- people who have experienced depressive or other kinds of episodes, are in the hospital and then are stabilized and ready to go back into the cormunitv, but would do better not going back to their families or into their own livinq situations at first. She stated often clients from Anoka County do not want to go into the central metropolitan areas because it is very frightenina to them. The clients are often very vulnerable to assault and often they have been victims of abuse in the past. Ms. Hanson stated all the clients are in the program voluntarily and do have to meet all the criteria, Once they are in the orogram, tfiey have a strong independent living skills component that trains them in cooking, cleaning, personal hygiene, transportation, budgeting, etc., depending on their individual needs. There are group therapy and individual therapy sessions. There is an educational vocational support proqram. Many ciients will be getting GED's, going to other work or college programs, or training programs. Hopefully, before they leave the program, they will be working or be in volunteer placement. Alt residents have individual psychiatrists and social workers working with them. PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 6 Ms, Hanson staYed the administration woutd be as follows: Administrator - 1/2 time Program Director - full time Therapist - fu17 time Counselor - full time Nurse - 1/2 time Secretary - 1/2 time Ms. Hanson stated there will be 24 hr, coverage but none of the staff will live there. Ms. Hanson stated they wi11 have a contract with Anoka County that savs what their client characteristics are to be and what their tarqet population is, and thev are bound to that contract to accept those clients. Thev also have the same criter4a placed on them by their Rule 36 license thev have with the Minnesota Dept. of Human Services. They will get that ]icenseybefore they start the operation, and it is reviewed annually. 7hey wi11 also have a super- vised living facility license from the Minnesota Health Dent, which indicates what type of clients they can take and governs suc� as aspects as food and medications. 7�ey will be able to take clients who are on psychotronic medications. The psychiatric nurse wi11 monitor the medications with the residents. Ms. 6abe1 asked that when there is minimal staff on weekends, are Lhe staff trained in crisis intervention? Was there an emergency procedure? Ms. Hanson stated all of their staff have to be trained in crisis intervention. She stated that at most times, there will be two people in the facility. At niqht from 11:00 p.m. - 8:00 a.m., there will be only one nerson,but there is always a Dack-up staff person �fith a beeper who is accessible and can come in, They aiso have an agreement with the hospital for back-up care and wi11 utilize the paramedics and police if the need arises. Ms. Gabel asked about the history Northwest Residence has had in terms of having to call the police. Ms. wright stated that in the past 1; years, they have had the police on stte only twice--on�e for a situation where a neighborhood person who was alcoholic came on the premises, and one incident where a woman had heart palpitations and thought she was having a heart attack. She stated they have not had to ca]1 the police for any internal conflict. This was not to say that it could not happen, but they have been very fortunate in preventing that. Ms. Schnabel asked about the average age span of the clients. Ms. Wright stated for this program they are anticipating clients from ages 18 - 35, PLANNINC, CONalISSI�N MEE?INGLAPRIL 3� 1985 PAGE 7 Mr. Minton stated he had two questions: (1� Could they explain what other suburban cities these kinds of facilities exist in or will exist in in the near future; and (2) Were they given any information on the number of Anoka County residents placed outside the County because of lack of this kind of facility in P,noka County? Ms. Hanson stated Janus Treatment Residence was in Bloomington. The others are only getting started. Another Qrogram is coming into Bloomington, North- west Residence is moving into Brooklyn Center, and others will be moving into New Hope, Golden Yalley, and Eden Prairie. Uakota County and Washington County are each getting a facility. Ms. Wright stated that at the end of February 1984, there were 20 Rule 36 clients out of Anoka County. The average for 1983-84 was 22 clients; and at any one time, the yearly average was figured at approximately 38 clients who could be in need of Rule 36 program. Ms. 5chnabel stated she was interested in a few statistics about Janus Treat- ment Residence in terms of how many persons are in that facility and if there have been any requests for police assistance. Ms. Hanson stated Janus is still an existing program run by Willows Convalescent Centers. It hr.s two four-ptex apartment units and has 24 residents. They have less supervision tfw n this program will have. They have only one night staff Qerson for both buildings and tfiat staff person sleeps. Otherwise, it was very similar. The residents are aged 18 - 35. While she was there, the calls made were probably one every 2-3 months for either an ambulance or police support, and that was for both internal and external kinds of things. There were no incidents involving anyone in the community. Mr, Minton stated some of the objections he has heard is that the facility proposed does not have adequate sized parking lot or yard. What was their answer to that? Ms. Hanson stated they would have liked a larger yard. They could not find any p7ace in Anoka Couaty that was perfect, and this was the closest they coutd get. They would like to have a fenced-in area so there was a piace for a picnic. They wi11 have a program van so they will often go as a grouo to other places. They think they will have adequate space for parking, Most of the time, their residents cannot afford cars. At most, there will be six staff at the site at one time. They wi11 have an internal policy that no one will park in front of neighborhood houses, Because they have intensive programning durin9 the day and most of the residents go to their fami9ies' homes, most frequently there are not many visitors. Ms. Hanson stated they had shown a video tape at the neighborhood meeting entitled, "With Open Arms" made by the Mentat Health Advocate Coalition. The first part nf the fitm was about residential treatment and had some scenes from another residential Rule 36 facility. She stated they have had some requests to show this video tape and it might be very.informative for both Comnission members and the people in the audience. Ms. Schnabel stated it would be appropriate to show this video tape at this time. PLANNING LOMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 3. 1985 PA6E B Ms. Susan Lentz, 222 Grain Exchange Building, Mpis.. stated she was an attorney with the Minnesota Me�tal Health Law Project. She was at the meeting to speak on behalf of the Mentat Health Association of Minnesota which was an affitiate of the National Mental Health Asssociation and was a state-wide organization devoted to education and advocacy for and on behalf of inentally tll people. 7he Mental Health Association did not ordinariiy endorse parti- cular providers, but she was at the meeting to endorce the concept of this Ru]e 36 facility in Anoka County and, specifically, in Fridtey, and to encourage the Plannfng Commiss�on to support the special use permit being considered at this meeting. She stated she h.s worked personally with both Ms. Wright and Ms. Hanson and she fe]t they were indeed competent and were professionals who could be relied on, who have done excellent jobs in other facilities. Ms, Lentz stated she has also been involved in the special use permit process and litigation about i± in a number of cortrcnunities. She knew the Ptanning Comnission realized their role was to consider whether the basic criteria for a special use permit have been met and, if so, to grant the permit. She stated they have already heard ample evidence about how this facility will meet various state requirements, county requirements, and wi11 fit into the neighborhood and will indeed benefit the neighborhood, Ms. Lentz stated Mr. Robinson had spoken to some of the issues in terms of state law. The State has set certain criteria that the decisions about allow- ing residential facilities for certain kinds of disabled people are matters of state concern. In this instance. if the criteria in the Citv's local ordinance and the State Ru1e 36 criteria are being met, this facility is entitled to be in this neighborhood, Ms. Lentz stated the Planning Canmission was probably aware that this was a matter that was litigated, and there was a decision by the Minnesota Board of Appeals a few months ago involving the City of Brookly� Center. She was involved in that case. In that case. the 6oard of Appeals noted that facilities for the mentally ill are really a matter of state concern as long as it meets state requirements, and one that should be allowed as long as the various criteria in the City,or in terms of impact on the external environmeni,are there. Ms. Marge Otten, 5311 4th St., handed out to the Planning Gomnission members pictures of the building so the Planning Commission members could see the size of the yard and parking lot. She stated she was not opposed to a mental health program for Anoka Lounty. That was not their purpose. They were at the meeting to consider whether this buildi�g was the right building to be chosen for the program, She stated she had been chosen by the neighborhood to read a letter addressed to Community Options, ltd., from A1 Kordiak, Chairman of the Anoka County Commissioners, dated March 22, 1985, in which Mr. Kardiak stated he did not think "tfie decision to locate a facility at 54th and 5th St, was in the best interest of either those to be served or those people who live in the adjoining area". Mr. Kordiak gave his reasons for that statement, and stated he was requesting the Mayor of Fridley, Ed Fitzpatrick, the Councilman representing that district, and Robert Barnette, Councilman-at-Large to support him "in requiring Comiwnity Options to select a site that was compatible with the area and one that in fact wouid have comnunity support". Mr.Kordiak stated he would De wfilling to help Comnunity Options select a more appropriate site. PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, t985 PAGE 9 Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Commission had received a copy of Mr. Knrdiak's letter in their agenda information. Ms. Rhonda Peterson, 515 54th Ave., stated she would like to add to the Plannin9 Comnission's minutes a tetter she had received the tirevious meeting from A1 Kordiak that was written from George Steiner� Oirector of Comnunitv Nealth and Social 5ervices Dept. of Anoka County, to A1 Kordiak, dated April 2, ]985. Ms. Peterson stated she operated a group family ticensed day care facility two blocks from the proposed site. There were nine Ticensed day �are �roviders within a six block radius of the proposed site. 5he had a concern from the parents of the children she takes care of. They are afraid for their children and sane will pull their chitdren out of her day care facility if this Rule 36 facility goes in: 5he stated her livelihood was in jeopardy because of this facility. Ms. Peterson stated she was not against this program at a11, She was an LPN. If there was a need for this in the comnunity, as there was a need for day care, she was all for it, but she was opposed to a site so close to famity day care and group family day care which would harm their business relationsfiips. Ms. Peterson stated day care providers have to be above reoroach because of their responsibility for the children and the children's care. She stated Lhe day care providers respect and follow those rules, dnd she could not have the added responsibility of knowing that two blocks away something could happen, She has had her day care license for nine years. Ms. Kathy Prieve, Anoka County Me�tal Health Advocates Coalition, stated she had worked at Rise, Inc.. coordinating the mental health program in Anoka County for the last 3; years. She was presently coordinating the proqram in Hennepin County. While she was working in Anoka County with Anoka County residents, other staff people noticed there were many people receivina tfieir services but had no place to live. They had to live in either downtown St. Paul or MinneapOlis, and some in St. Louis Park. She stated there are some people in Fridley who are mentally ill and have a right to service in their own community. They are your family, your neighbors, your friends. Ms. Prieve stated they organized some consumers, professionals, and concerned citizens and tried to advocate for change in Anoka County. Over the last 3� years, they have worked with County staff people, city people, and private organizations, to improve the mental health services in the corrrnunity. Their number one priority since May 1981 was to get a residential facility. They have worked very hard for this, and they think Fridley is the best site. The people of Fridley are very friendly, the community is �ice, and the transpor- tation is excellent. This site was close to Rise, Inc., in Spring Lake Park, Central Center for Family Resources in Blaine, and accessible to many medicai services. Ms. Toni Holcomb, 45 - 106th Ave., stated that every time she had to move, she had to move into Minneapolis or St. Paul, She stated she had worked at PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, APRII 3, 1985 PAGE 10 D.A,C. with little children, and no one was warried about her being with the children. Mr, Ray Lafave, 5375 5th St., stated t�ey have gone around the neighborhood with a petition, and he would Tike to present this petition to the Planning Corrmission, He stated the petition stated the following: "We, the undersigned, petition tfie Fridley City Council and fridley Planning Commission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Comnunity Options, Ltd.. for the purpose of using the 4-plex located at 5378-5384 5th St. N.E.. Fridley as a mental health facility. we believe this site is unsuitabte because: 1. The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2. There is fear for the safety of the many chitdren in the area as well as the adults. 3. The potential for property values to go down. 4, It is a densely populated area due to the many muttip]e dweTlings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5, It would cause the loss of tenants to area landlords. 6. It wauld create parking problens in the area, 7. It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8. We believe a rtare suitabte location ca� be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9. It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave., University, and the freeway," Mr, Lafave stated they had a neighborhood meeting and a meeting with Ms. Hanson, so they have been educated about this. He stated he would guess aoproximately 90% of the neighbors within a three-block radius were against this site far the reasons listed in the petition. Mr. Lafave stated he owns a double bungalow. He ltves there and maintains it and plans on raising his family there. He bought his building B', years ago with the assumption that there was a multiple dwelling across the street with four families. Now, there Nfill be more people in that building, Me stated the people are leary of this program, whether it is prejudice or ignorance, it did not matter. 7he neighborhood is not necessarily opoosed to the facility, but they feel this is not the proper location for the facility. The building is not adequate. Mr, Lafave stated this is a struggling neighborhood, and many of the home- owners are trying to keep their property values up. This faciiity will not help them at all. Mr. Lafave stated some of these peopie are self-destructtve. They feel th?s will brin9 more chaos into the neighborhood. There will be more ambulances in the neighborhood. Mr. Lafave stated there are eigfit doors in the building, For security reasons thPre is only going to be one person there at night to assure the neighborhoad there will not be any problems. There was no comrrion hallwa,y in the building. PIANNIt7G COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 31 1985 PAGE 11 XOTION BY XR, OQUIST, SECONDED BY �YR, NIELSEN� R1� RECEIT'E PETITSON NO. $'�9$5 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CAAIRWONAN SCXNABEL D&CLdRED THE HOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Ms. Becky Fink, 1958 - 105th Ave „ Coon Rapids, stated she was the Director of the AnokalMcKnight Community Health Support Program. She stated she would like to speak about the need for community-based services. She stated Community Options was very much solicited by the County and through a lot of work by the Mental Health Consortium of Anoka County, which has a number of family members, consumers, pOlity makers, providers, all of whom felt the need for this service. Ms, Fink stated that when they talk about the need for parents to be able to choose day care sites, she would like to say that in the audience there are family members as well whose children grew up to hdve mental health problems. These are people living in this comnunity. As someone who has provided comnunity-based services in the last five years, she has had the opportunity as jo6 placement person for Rise to serve the very people they are talking about here and help get jobs for them in the community. Ms. Fink stated one of the roles of the Anoka/McKnight Foundation is to work on community education, because they know that one in four or oae in five are affected by mentat illness. She stated there were family rer�bers at this meeting who would probably not testify that their grown adult children have had to move out of the comnunitv because of the "mentally ill" stigma. Ms. Fink stated she could understand the concer� about safety. They have been operating community-based services in Anoka County for a number of years, and there have not been any safety issues. In terms of ambulances, yes ambulances can appear a number of different times at dnyone's home, nursing home, and perhaps a Rule 36 residence. She hoped it was O.K. to call for that type of service if people are in need of it. Ms, Fink stated that having been involved in the last 1; years in tfiis service they have worked so hard to bring to Anoka County, she wanted to say tfiey were very confident in Community Options Ltd. Anoka County was certainly the last metr000litan county to have its own residence. As someone very concerned about mental ill services, if it has taken them this tong to get one here, they fully intend to make this facility one of the best, if not the best, in the State of Minnesota. She would appreciate the Planning Commission's support of this special use permit. Mr. Jim Nimlos, 625 Dover St., stated he lives just kitty corner fror� Roma Maloy, who has a foster home for mentally ill adults. Ne stated he has lived for 2� years at this address, and he has witnessed a couole of ambulances coming to Ms. Roma's home only because he happened to be looking out the window. The ambulances have never caused any disruption to the neighborhood, He stated he has an 8 month old son at home with his wife, and he has absolutely no fear for himself, fiis wife, or his son in living close to the same type of people who wouid stay at this Rule 36 facility, PLANNING COMMI55I017 FIEETING,APRIL 3, 1985 PAf,E 12 Ms. Irene vasecka, 5427 4th 5t „ stated she had calted her insura�ce company and was told her home insurance would go up if this faciiity was put in operation, SF�e stated they, in the Third Ward, received no notices about this specia] use permit request, Ms. Linda Anderson, 5360 5th St., stated she was out getting petitions sfgned, and she did not have one person turn her down. She felt this business was a for-profit business, and it was being forced on them. They do not want it and do not need it in this locaiion. There are too many chiidren in the neigh6orhood. Ms. Rona Maloy, 7995 Broad Ave., stated she was the foster provider mentioned earlier. 5he stated that, yes, the ambulance has to be catled to her house occasionally because she has an epileptic person who lives with her. A concern she had was that Anoka County people have had to travel to Minneapolis and 5t. Paul. She has had girls in her home who have had to go to Minneapo7is or St. Paul, and tt has actually torn them apart because they are away from their friends, parents, and ti�eir cormunity. She stated they seldom get visitors. She stated she also has a day care center across the street from her, and there have never been any problems. In fact, some of her giris have been asked to babysit chiTdren in the comnunity. She stated that in a facility like the Rule 36 facility, the residents can get far more structured help than she is a61e to provide in her home. Mr. John LaBreche, 1381 Onondaga St., stated he has been a resident of Fridley for nearly eight years. He was Co-Chair of the Anoka County Mental Heaith Advocates Coalition. He was saeaking in favor of the special use permTt. He was very interested in this issue because he suffers from mental illness. He has been hospitaTized four times in the last ten years. On the other hand, he has been employed for the last six years, has a wife, two small children, and awns his own home. Mr. LaBreche stated he wanted to taik about what he saw as the main issue here. He stated the neighbors near this proposed residence are afraid of inentally ill peopie, The question was: Is that fear reasonable or not? He stated most people get their information about mental iliness from the 7V, mavies, and newspapers. TV and movies portray mentally ill peoale as blood thirsty killers. With this type of information, it was no wonder the general public was afraid of the mentally ill. He stated this is not the true picture. He stated that 60D,D00 peoole in Minnesota will need some tyoe of inental health service this year, over 60,Q00 of those are chronically mentally i17, What pe rcentage of these thousands are dangerous to others or property? He stated tt is a very small percentage. Even if it is a small percentage, how do they know that some of them might not slip thro�gh and be in this facility? He stated the directors of this center wili reiy on psychiatrists and other professionals in the fieid to screen out those people with violent histories. There is no guarantee, but the track record of the otf�er facflities for these people is clear. The probability of an incident at this facitity was quite small. Mr. LaBreche stated that from his own experience and his own illness, he did not know if he could communicate to the people who have never been mentalty ill how great the need was for such a residence in Anoka County. Ne stated he was released from the Yets Haspital in Georgfa in July 1975. ,4t that time, PLAF�NIN6 COMh1IS5I0N MEETING, APRIL 3, 1965 PAGE 13 there was no Rule 36 residence available to him. Ne was iso]ated and Cewildered by his iilness and thought he would never have a normal life. He needed the support of professionals, but rtare than that, he needed to be wfith others ivith experiences 7ike his--a halfway point between the hospital and independence-- in the community close to normal people with normal ]ives, but with some protection and support, Because he did not have this, he 4elieves his recovery was delayed and his suffering increased. Ne stated he does live a nornial life now as also many others do. The goal of this Rule 36 residential treatment center is to help mentally ill persons achieve as nearly a normal life as possible. The need is great, and he would urge the Planninq Comaission to vote in favor of the special use permit. Ms. Schnabel stated the P1a�ning Commission members also had a letter Mr. LaBreche had written about his feelings on this subject and urging the Planning Commission to vote favorably for the special use permit. Ms. Sue Jenson, 5384 5th St., stated she lives in the building pr000sed for this Rule 36 facility. Everyone is so concerned about these people having a place to live, but what about her? She stated she is a single Darent with a small son working 40 hrs, a week. She has found nice people in this neiqhbor- hood, and she is very comfortable living here. She stated she has never had any contact with mentally ill people and admitted she was very uneducated. But, as a renter, if thts special use permit is approved, she would never consider rentin9 from anyone in the nefghborho�d. She stated that as far as the building, it is in very poor condition. Ms. Nadine Phillips, 1427 Hennepin Ave. S., Minneapolis, stated her "label" is chronically mentally ill. She was five years old when she had her first nervous breakdown because of family problems and because in her family she did not learn how to cope. She did not tearn what it meant to be angry and not hurt herself, because everyone else was hurting her. So, she started cutting herself, She stated she still has a probtem with cutting, but it is not nearly as serious as it was, but it got to the point where she was cuttinq fierself 4-5 times a day. Because she could see the pain on her arm, that �ain meant that what was hurting inside made sense. She grew up never being able to express any feelings so those feetings got stuffed inside. Ms. Phillips stated later on she got married and had twin sons born with a lung disease. The responsibility of her sons was totally on her, Her marriage was one of an abusive situation. She got very depressed, put her sons into foster care, and took an overdose. She was admitted to the hosnital and was admitted to the psychiatric ward, In the psychiatric ward, after she got out of intensive care, they 6egan to work with her. Ner hospitalization lasted about eight months. She had shock treatments, numerous amounts of medicine, and eventually they decided she should be committed to Anoka State Hospital. Sane people froM Court Petitioning came and talked to her and asked her if she had ever been through treatment. She stated she had not but just wanted to get well and would give it a try, They recomnended to the courts that she be sent to Janus Treatment Residence. When she got to Janus, she was very withdrawn. She was scared, but more than anything else, she was hurting, She was not desperate enough to run nut to a park and hurt little cfiildren. No one she was in treatment with would hurt children. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 31 1985 PAGE 14 Ms. Phillips stated she stated one year and three months at Janus, and she learned a 1ot about what she was all about. She learned it was O.K, to have feelings a�d learned what her feelings were and how to express those feelings positively. She doesn't have to hurt herself anymore. Ms. Philiips stated she was the kind of individual they were considering wf�ether or not should live in this cormunity. She stated she does not hurt peop]e. Mainly the media has made them into "maniacs". The majority of the population that is mentaily fll are not "maniacs". Ms, Phillips stated that s{nce she got out of Janus about a year ago, she has gotten her GED, has started college full-time studying physical therapy at St. Mary's Jr. College, She stated it is a tough program, but she is making it. She takes medications and goes to a psychiatrist two times a week, but she is holding herself together and sf�e is verv proud of the accomplishments she has made. She has a long way to go yet to feel good about herself, but nonethe7ess, she is doing very vrel�, and she would not have had that chance if it were not for a program like Janus Treatment Residence. Mr. Michael Anderson, 5360 5th St,. stated there were very few people in this room who were against people with mental illness and were not against any program. It made him angry when people got up and said he did not care for these people when he did care for people. He objected to the site for this progran. He did not feel this was the right type of buiiding. Ne felt the building should have a centrai hall so people can be monitored and get help if they need it. Mr. Anderson stated that when he grew up and went to school, he was taught he was living in a democracy and the people who live in an area have a right to govern the�elves and have a right to say what happens in their neighborhood. Ms, Janet Nye, 2172 Portland Ave. S., �+inneapolis, stated she lives two do�rs down from Senttnel House which was viewed on the video tape earlier in the meeting. She stated she has never seen any agqressive activity on the part of the residents who iive there. In fact, she has had some very pleasant conversations with the people who live there. 7heir house is also the nicest kept house on the block. She was in support of this program, and she felt these people deserved a better chance to have a better life. Mr. An¢y Haechrel, 5367 5th St., stated he was not against the mental health facility either, but he felt this buiading was a bad place for it, because of the children, parks in their neighborhood, and they are not accustomed to this type of thing. It was a drastic change for the neighborhood. Ms. Pat Sudiicki, 5380 6th St., stated she has lived at this address for 23 years. She could understand the need for the program, She sympathized with the afflicted and their families. In their neighborhood, because of the multiple dwellings, they have a high density population and parkinq is already at a premium. She was concerned a6out the parking situation. She was concerned about the fact that the buiiding would have eight doors. How can the building be secure at night with onty one person on duty? She did DLANNING CONMISSION hEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 15 not think this was the best building for this program, and the neighborhood did nat need the additional problems this type of facility would bring, Mr. Ray Lafave, 5375 5th St., stated he wanted to emphasize to the people in the audience, the Planning Comnission, and the City Council that they were in sympathy with tfiose who suffered from mental illness. They were 3ust against the location of this faci]ity. He Has also a proponent for government rrorking for the people and not the people having to listen to the government. He stated the Planning Cortmission should not let the attorney present in the audience intimidate their decision. He stated the neighbor- hnod is willing to hire an attorney to look ir.to the legalities. Ms, Nancy Jorgenson, 5730 Polk St „ stated she was President of the Anoka Day Care Association. She had been contacted by several day care providers in the area--there are nine within a six block area. The providers are servicing between 50-75 families. These people, through ignorance or whatever, are going to be necessarily or unnecessarily alarmed at what is happening in fridley, There has been media coverage of this and there will be more. Ms. Jorgenson read tfie letter from George Steiner, Oirector of the Anoka County Lommunity Health & Sociat Services Dept., addressed to A1 Kordiak dated April 2, 1985, in which Mr. Steiner stated Corrmunitv Qptions was responsible for the setection of a site for the Rute 36 facility, and that tfie County was not recommending a specific site for this facility. She stated it was her understanding that the neighborhood had been told that this site fiad already been approved by the Lounty. This is not the case. Ms. Jorgenson stated she could not give her opinion as she was representinq the Anoka County Day Care Association, and she has not talked to a11 nine of the day care providers in this area. She has talked to three who are definitely opposed to this facility for fear of the loss of business. Again, they were looking at putting a commercial business in a residentiaT area. The person with foster care and the day care providers also have businesses, but those businesses are in their homes. She stated she Mas worked with children with learning disabilfties and special disabitities. She has found these children to be generally quite happy in the environment sfie provides. She has also found that when they do become frustrated or angry, they do get physical to themselves. Ner concern was that children will learn what they live. The children in the neighborhood are going to learn by what is happening around them, not that someone is necessarily going to physicatly harm them, but some consideration should be given to the numbers of chitdren in this neighborhood and not have a commercial business in this residential ne�ghborhood. Mr. Richard Byers, 5300 StFi St., stated he has lived at this address for 21 years. This proposed iacility was a cortmercial enterprise dispensina medication for which they have to have licensed people, sa it was a hospital in form; it was not a residential home. Whether the fear of inentally ill people was founded or unfounded, it is still fear. There are some older people in Lhe neighborhood who are not going to feel comfortable or safe in tbeir bomes, They are not objecting to the program; they are objecting to the location and the quality of the �roposed building for this purpose. The building is not well constructed and is not in good condition. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 3, T985 PAGE 16 Ms. Terry Buckeridge, 6365 5th St., stated her parents live on the block in question. She grew up feeling this neighborhood was safe, She has a daughter two years o1d. and she wauld feel unsafe bringing her daughter over to her parents' home if this facility goes in, She was not opposed to the program. If tfie people in question have sporadic mood swings and go through stages where they are uncontroilable, how do the people in the neighborhood know what these moods are going to be from one moment to the next? There is r.o guarantee there. She grew up in this neighborhood. and she felt it should be kept safe for the peop7e living there now and the generations that grew up there. Mr. Jerry Skaare, 538D 5th St., stated he lived in the buildinq in question. He stated there was barely room for the eight parkina areas mentioned by Mr. Robinson. From taiking to people in the neighborhood, he had not sensed any resentment to the mentally ill. He believed a large percentage of the people in the neigh6orhood have been tou'ched by mental illness in their families. Ne has been. He just felt that if there were other options for the facility in commercial zoning, 20,000 sq. ft, for 14 peop]e seemed to be more aporo- priate than 11.000 sq. ft. Mr, Skaare stated that as a resident, there is no front ,vard, and the back yard is all parking lot. The building is in need of a lot of repairs, and the parking lot needs to be replaced. Ms. Marian Crandall, 5370 5th St., stated her back door iooks aver into the parking lot c�here they anticipate putting up a privacy fence. With a fence, she wtll open her back door and feel tike she is in prison. She stated she has a family member who is mentally ilt, but there are other places for a home for the mentatly ill than in a residential area. She was also concerned agout the parking, especially in the winter time. Mr. Roger Stene, 870 Pandora Dr.,stated he was a sinqle parent of a mentaily ill son, He stated he would like to say something about mentally itl peonte. Thr.re are a number of them who live riqht in his neighborhood, and he did not think his neighbors even knew it. He stated his son lives with him because there is a 1-5 year waiting list in Hennepin County for these types of residences. These people are living artang Fridley people right now, and Lhey do not even know it. He stated that regarding the driving and parking situation, if a person lives in a Rule 36 facility, they usually get $36/month and a bus card. The fear of the extra cars and traffic is comnletely unfounded. He stated in his neighborhnod, the biggest prohlem is the harassment of the neighbors towards his son, so his son spends ttast of his time inside. He stated it really hurt him to hear these things being said about people like his son, and there has been no place like this avaflable for his son, It was better for these people to be living in controlled situations tike the facility pr000sed than to be just walking the street when oarents are working and they are alone most of the time. Ms. Susan Lentz stated she wanted to respond to some remarks that were made with reference ta her. She stated she was sure the Planning Comnission would 6e consulting with their own legal counsel, and she was only there to point out the view of the Mental Nealth Association, She would like to make a comnent about the fact Lhat this is allegedly a commercial use. She quoted 5tate PLAiJNIt16 CONMISSION FIEETIN6, APRIL 3, 1985 PA6E 17 Statute MS 245,812. Subd. 3, which stated: "Unless othervoise provided in any municipal/county zoning regulation, a licensed residential facility serving from 7 through 16 persons, or a licensed day care facilitv of children, shall be considered a permitted multi-family residential use o4 propertv for purposes of zoning." Ms. Lentz stated that while she could understand the neighborhood's concerns, she wanted to point out a tot of cnntradictory information: That this facility was too close to traffic; that too muCh traffic would be created; that there is not enough recreation and yet it is too close to the parks; that there is the potential for property values to decline, vet numerous studies have been done showing there is no decl{ne in property values• on the other hand it has been said that this building was already in a�eteriorated condition and not good for anyone tc live in, She would like to suggest that neighborhood oppositian based on stereotypes was not a v�lid reason for denying the special use permit. She would also tike to point out that persons with mental illness are a protected class under the Human Rights Act and cannot be discrir�inated against. 5he stated tf�ere was reference made by someone in the audience that children learn from what they see. She would hope that chitdren would learn tolerance from the example af a neighborhood that accep�s a 4'acility like this. Mr. Don Lavin, 180 River Edge Way, stated he was the Program Director for Rise, Inc. Rise, Inc., is a private, non-profit rehabilitation facility located in Spring Lake Park, Rise provides job training and job placement assistance for people with disabilities living in Anoka County and surrounding comnunities, including Fridley. They have a very proud history of providing services, employment, and job placement support for people with disabilities. They have been serving Fridley for l4 years and have learned quite a bit about peoole with disabitities includinq mental il]ness. They have learned it takes good jo6 placeMent programs, good placement support� and activity with the business community. It also takes stability in the individuals' personal lives and a supportive healthv living environment. This is somethinq that has been lacking in this county for some time. Rise supports tf�e development of this residence and lo�ks forward to cooperating with them. Ms. Darlene Rusch, 561 63rd A:�e., stated she was re�resenting the Social Ministry of St. Williams Catholic Church with does su000rt this orogram in the City of Fridley. Sfie would like to make the folto�ting comments: If not us, who? If not here,tahere? If not now, khen? It has been stated that one out of four people sufFer from mental illness. In a city of 30,000 people, she would guess that people in this audience were either t�uched nersonally b,y mental illness or would be at some point in their lives. Ms. Rusch stated she did not believe peonle were born with me�tal illness. She believed there was a chenicel imbalance in the brain so they cannot function as well as "normal" people. She would venture to say that if they were qoinn to house 14 diabetic people, there would not be nearly the opposition as there was at this meeting. Sonehow, people can accept soneone as a diabetic, but cannot accept a person who, through no fault of his/her own, is mentallv i11. No one wants a facTlity like this in their neighborhood, near their thildren, near their day care center, near their business or park, so where are these people going to live? Fridley should be big enough to encompass all peoole. PLANNING COMMISSION �EETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 18 5he grieved for the mentally ill and their families, and as a Christian, she would offer them hope, and she hoped the City of Fr',dley would do the same. Mr. Alan Swenson, 5353 4th St.. stated he owned the property directly behind the building in question. He did not think this was the tvae of prooerty to be used for this facility. He t6ought a much Detter site could be found. There are many children in the area wfio often go unsupervised to and from the ptayground down the block. He stated children can be very cruel unknowinqly, and he thought a bad situation could evolve frrom this. He would recomnend the Planning Commission deny the soecial use permit request. Ms, Linda Keating ctated she worked for Rise, Inc., in Spring Lake Park. She was a vocational training supervisor for the chronicalty mentally ill. She worked with a case load of 20-25 people, 8 hours a day, 5 davs a week. She stated these people come exclusively frpm Anoka County and vrould like to iive in Anoka County. They are nice people, and she enjoys working with them. They make good emp7oyees. She stated she has heard a lot of discussion from the neiqhbors, and there are some legitimate concerns and legitimate fears, and a lot of the neighbors are willing to admit they are uninformed on this issue. She saw a lot of energy going into trying to keep that information as far away as possible. She would ask them to put as much energy into understanding mental ill�ess and what they should and shouldn't be afraid of, what the program will and will not do, will and wf11 not permit. Ms. Vicky Otis, 5378 5th St., stated she lived in the proposed building stte. She stated she had not been aware of this proposal earlier; and now if Lhis special use permit is approved, four families wil] be disp7aced. Ms. Schnabel stated she would now like to give the petitioners an oo�ortun5ty to respond to concerns and questivns. Ms. Diane Wright stated she did write down some of the comnents�and questions and would try to respond to these. She stated this would not be a locked faci7ity. Whether there are six or eight doors would make no difference. Their concern was not on having constant visual contact with the clients. They wilt not have clients in their facility who need one-on-one supervision. They rely mostiy on peer support; in fact, in a good treatment center, a lot of the treatment is done by the peers and not always exclusively by the treat- ment staff. Ms. Wright stated the visual aspects of the property are not of a major concern to them 6ecause there are several things thev need to do to bring it up to code. They picked the property for the reasons mentioned earlier in the meetinq. Ms, Wrtght stated they are a business and wili conduct themse]ves as a business; Lhat is a quality they have. However, this will be Yhe clients' residential home. even though for her and Ms. Hanson it is a business. She stated it was important to take the perspective of the residents who wi11 be living there. These people deserve to be in a community-based facility in a residential area. Having the facility in a commercial area would not make it community-based care. PLANNING COHMISSI�IJ MEETINGiAPRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 19 Ms. Wright stated a concern expressed was the explosive nature of the clients. 6enerally speaking, clients are not explosive at a whim. Usually when a client is starting to decompensate, the treatment staff have been aware of the synptoms over d long period of time, and they can do a lot of preventative things to prevent that episode from occurring. They cannot guarantee a crisis will never happen, but their staff are well trained in noticing symotoms. That is a key part of the pro9ram. Ms. Wright stated that as far as parking, it has been their history that maybe one or two clients might have a car, Most of these people live on 535-40Jmonth. At any one time, they will probably only have four staff inembers at the residence and up to six at the most for a special meeting, Ms. Wright stated that as far as the concern about parents and day care centers, she would recommend that rather than the day care providers trying to do the education that the parents be encouraged to visit their facilities. They would be happy to educate the parents that have concerns. Mr. Saba asked Ms. Wright to describe the make-ua of the{r Comnunity Advisory Council and what kind of authority they would have over this facility. Ms. Wright stated the advisory council was required by state 1aw and requires that members cone from a mix of tfie community. For example, Northwest Residence has a consumer� a parent, a county social worker, three neighborhood repre- sentatives,including a city official. Occasionally, they can get a Dsychiatrist or a lawyer on the counc:l. She stated the authority of the council is not the same as a board of directors, but they have the authoritv to give advice to the program and to the Board of Directors. In her situation, they serve as a grievance panel for her staff and clients. The council has fu11 access to statistics, fi�ancial data, licensing information, etc. She would assume Ms. Hanson would run this program in the same way. Ms. Nanson stated they would like to have neighborhood volunteers on the council. If there was a large enough group, it would also be nice to have a separate neighborhood advisory board, as w�l} as neighborhood representation on the advisory council, because they feel it is particularly imnortant to have good relationships with the neighborhood, It has been their experience that there is always neighborhood opposition, but fortunately the neighbors becnme their friends later. She felt this would happe� here a15o. Ms. Hanson stated there would be no sign on the outside of the building. Again, they looked at a lot of buildings and this best fit their needs. It also meets all state requirements. MOTZON BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. M.TNPON, TO CLOSE TNE PUBLZC NEARI7.G D:. SP i{85-01 BY COMMUNITY OPTZONS, LTD., BY RANAE HANSON. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRWOPfAN SCHNRBEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC AEARZNG CTASED AT 11:00 P,M. �j PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City of Fridley AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 3, 1985 1. PUBLIC HEARIN6: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 2 � 4. 5. 6. ). 8. Per Section 205.07.1, C, 6, of the Fridley city �oae, io allow parking lot expansion on Lot i, Block 1, Maple Manor Addition, the same being 7590 Lyric Lane N.E. PUBLIC HEARIN6: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP M$5-04, BY �E A. LINDI4AN: Per Section 205. 7.1, 3, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 2D by 16 foot garage, to be used for storage of a classic car, on Lot 26 and the tlorth 25 feet of Lot 25, Block 16, Plymouth including the vacated alley, the same being 4565 - 3rd Street N.E. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. 85-0 , LANDMARK DDITION, 6Y ROBERT MCADAM: Being a replat of the property described as Lot 5, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. �7. TABLED 2/27/85: LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. A85-03, BY ROBERT GILSTAD: Split off the Easter y 120 feet, except the Northerly I35 feet of part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25 (see file for complete le9al) to be used as a parking lot for the apartments on Lynde Drive. (Moore Lake Apartments Complex) REVIEW OF AN ORDINANCE RECOOIFYING THE FRiDLEY CITY CODE IDERATION OF APPROVAL OF SIGN PLAN FOR 7570 HIGHWAY „� 7:30 P.M. PAGES 1 -34 35 - 41 42 - 47 Q ���] � 69 - 74 75 - 80 IEW OF AN ORDINAtdCE RECODIFYING TH� FRIDLEY CITY CODE B� - 99 AMENDIP:G CHAPTER 214 EN?ITLC� "SIGNS". IEW OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE RECODIFYItlG 7HE fRIDLEY CITY 100 -]02 r av ennoriNr. 6 NF4� CHAPTFR 90R FNTITIF� "SATELLITE DISH 9. APPROVAL OF COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL GRANT APPLICATION. Information only 10. REVIEW OF fiN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE � it.�.vv aa�.v� � •i.�.avy , 103 104 - 110 ING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 3 1985 PAGE 20 Mr. Oquist stated it was not apparent to him that the buildinq was adequate, but it was adequate by state code. They have heard often that this is not the right site, but he was not sure what the right site really was, and how do they choose the right site? He thought there were times when they, as a City, have to look at tfie xhole and not an isolated area and feel mavbe this is something they have to be responsibie far, Mr. Oquist stated that in reading over the information, he was not sure they could deny this special use permit based on an interpretation of State law which reads: "Rather, it must be read to permit municipalities to impose only special health and safety standards appropriate to the characteristics of a particular site...The grant of authority does not permit municipalities to establish special regulations concerning the general welfare of inentally ii1 adults and thus is not a basis for a special occupancy requirement." MS 245.812). Mr. Oquist stated there was another statement regarding the court case between Northwest Residence, Inv. vs Citv of Brooklyn Center which stated: "The Court of Appeals re,7ected each of these contentions upon a determination that the alleged probTems would not be any greater u�der the proposed use than they would be under uses already permitted by the ordinance." Mr. Oquist stated the contentions talked about were parking problems, traffic hazards, inadequate recreational facilities, a diminution of enjoyment of adjacent oroperty, that the use was a greater intensiFication of a nrevious non-conforming use. and the structure was not designed to occupy 18 individuais. Mr. Oquist stated that from a 1ega1 standpoint, he did �ot think they could prove a reai safety-type hazard, so he would have to vote in favor of the special use permit. Mr. Saba stated they talk about the people not having a voice. The state statutes that the city is bound by are passed by sLate legislators, and people often ignore what happens at the state legislature and then complain when they have to 7ive by those state statutes. He stated they have to abide by this state statute; however, they can impose stipulations on a special use permit. Ms. Schnabel stated that on the basis of the court case in Brooklyn Center, the P]anning Comnission must be very careful in their decision. They need sone pretty substantial concrete reasons for denial. Mr. Minton stated he would also like to express appreciation to the two people who have exoerienced mental illness and the father with the mentallv ill son for sharing their experiences with those present. He stated he felt that took a lot of courage, because this is a very emotionally-charged meeting. He stated all the residents from the neighborhood have been very careful to note that they are not against the program for the mentally ill, are not against the mentally ill, and felt this kind of program should be somewhere even if it is not in their neighborhood, He fe7t the objections they have heard are objections Lhey would find in any neighborhood in Anoka County. 7hey are legitimate objections. There are fears. Maybe the fears are PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 21 unfounded, but as one gentlement said, founded or unfounded� they are still fears. He stated he felt the Planning Commission has to go beyond these ktnds of interests, because they are representing an element of government-- the city 9overnment. They have to go beyond the interests of onlv a neighbor- fiood, They have to consider the interests of the entire community, and sometimes they have to think even broader than that. Mr. Minton stated they are talking about a stigma. This country has dealt with stigmas of various kinds very well over the past 25 years, and the only wa:e to address a stigma is to deal with it and not perpetuate it, Based on that, he would have to vote in favor of the special use permit. Mr, Minton stated it appeared to him that �his was a quality program. He felt the fact that it �as a private business was a very positive element, Ne would much rather have this done by contract than by government. He felt many of the fears expressed can be dissipated over time, and it was important to give this program time. He stated that as one person had mentioned, there are numerous studies that indicate that property values do not go down, and he felt they had to give this facility a chance. Ms. Gabel stated Mr. Minton had expressed her sentiments very well. She felt they have some social responsibilities, and it is time for them to take a look at those responsibilities. Thay are talking about some very vulnerabte peonle with special needs that can be met in this community without causing any harm to the health, safety, and welfare of the remainder of the community. She stated the fears are obviously real, but she thought the people could learn to deal with those fear.s. 5he would be in favor of the special use permit. Mr. Nielsen stated he was in agree+aent and would vote in favor of the snecial use permit. Mr. Kondrick stated he was also in agreement with what was said. He realized it was hard for the people in the neighborhood to accept this, but he could not find a reasonable reason ta deny the special use permit request. MOTION BY MR, OQUZST� SECONDED BY lQR, RONDRICK, TO RECOMMEND TD CITY CDUNCIL APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR A SPECZAL USE PERMZT, SP #85-01, COMMUNITY OPTZONS, LTD,� BY RANAE HANSCXV� PER SECTION 205,09.1, C� 5� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, Rt� ALLOW RULE 36 RF.SZDENTIAL MENTAL NEALTH PROGRAM FOR ANOXA COUNTY, ON IqT 1 AND Z, BLOCK 24, HANILTYIN`S ADDITION TO 17ECHANICSVILLE� PHE SAME BEING 5378-5389 Sth STR6ET N.E., WZTH TNE FGLIAWZNG STIPULASIONS: I. OPERATION TO BE REVIEWED ANNUALLY WITH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE FZRST TWO YEARS. 2. RESIDENTS WITN AUTOMOBILES BE RESTRZCTED TO FIVE OR LESS. 3. REAR YARD T1� SE FENCED 8'ZTX SIX FOOS NIGH SOLID WPDD FENCE. THZS IS TO BE COMPLETED PRIDR TO OCCOPANCY, 4. PROPOSED ADVISDRY COMMI^_'TEE TO INCLUDE CITY RF.PRESENTATNES (I.E, HUMAN RESOURCES COHMISSIDN MEMBER ANB/OR POLZC£ SPECSAL OPERATIRNS DIVISIDN STAFF). 5, PETITIONER TO PROVIDE A LANASCAPZNG PLAN AND ZNSTRLL PRIOP. 1t� OC2'aBER 31, 2985. PLANNING GOMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 22 6, CONTINGENCY PLAN BE INITIATED WITH Ul'STY HOSPITAL 11? COVER ANY ENERGENCIES, 7. FACSL727 WILL CONPLY WITX ALL STATE AND CDUNTY RULES a1VD LAWS AND BE FULLY LZCENS£D. . 8. FRCZLITY WFLL COIiPLY WITN THE LOCAL AND STATE FIRE CODES. 9. CLZENT CXARAC2ERZSPICS WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH PETITIONER'S CON2RACT WZTN ANOKA COUNTY, UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY. Ms. 5chnabel stated this was a reconrnendation to the City Councit, and this ftem would be heard at the City Council on Monday, April 15, Chainroman Schnabel declared a 15 minute recess at 11:15 p.m. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING RE UEST, ZOA +Y85-�], BY GERALD G. JOHNSON: Rezone from R-1 one family dwellings and R-3 General multiple dwellinrl and C-i (local business} to C-2 (general business}, �ot 5, Block 5, anQ Out3ot 1, Do�nay's Lakeview Manor , to be used for Comnercial developme�t, genrally located at 5698 I�est Moore Lake DrTVe N.E. M7TION BY XI2, MIN2t�N, SECONDED BY NR, NIEISEN, 2L7 OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING QN ZOA M85-02 BY GERALD G. JOHNSC3R'. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 3I:30 P.M, Mr, Robinson stated this property was located south of West Nbore Lake Drive and west of Highway 65. The petitioner was reauesting a rezoning from R-1, R-3,a�d C-1 to C-2. This area was part of a city approved Redevelopment District and, as such, was under consideration from time to time by the HRA for development proposals. The City has been working with road improvements; and if this rezaning is approved, the City would require sor�e right of way to improve the road system in this area. In addition, they would be improvin9 the turning tanes in that area. The City is in the process of having finat working drawings done for this improvement. Mr, Robinson stated Staff was recommending the following st9pulations: 1. Petitioner to provide the City the necessary right-of-way to make proposed street improvements; to include 7and for inter- section improvements, cul-de-sac and 60 foot right-df-way for road construction. 2. Outiat 5 shall remain R-1; not to be included in rezoni�g. 3, final approval of this rezoning sha11 be contingent upon anProvai of a site plan and plat consistent with plans and goals in the development district. PLANNIN6 CfM1MISSION �EETING APRIL 3 1985 PAGE 23 Mr. Bill Crouch stated he was Lhe attorney for Gerald Johnson. Mr. Johnson was also in the audience. He stated Mr. Johnson purchased this parcel in 1458. This property currently contains three separate zoning classifications, the vast majority of it being R-1, He stated they are requesting a rezoning to C-2, They have no proposed site plan for review and no hidden agenda at this time, Last week Mr. Johnson listed the propertv with a cortmercfal real estate 6roker to seek developers andjor buyers for the property. Mr. �rouch stated that when Mr. and Mrs, Johnson first addressed the idea earlier this year of having the property rezoned, it was recommended by the City that they seek out tfie nearest residents affected by the potentiai rezoning, They selected 11 homes and property sites, seven on Jackson St. and four on West Moore Lake Drive, These properties were the most directly affected, ln late �anuary and early february, Mr, Johnson personallv contacted the owners of these properties. He stated all 11 of these prooerty owners has signed the following petition: "14y signature on this Fetition indicates to the CiYy of Fridley that I have met with GERALD G, JOHNSON and have reviewed with him a plat and an aerial photograph of the above described premises, and that I have no objection to Mr. Johnson's efforts to have the above-referenced property rezoned from R-1 and R-3 to C-2 general business district." MOTION EY MR, NIELSEN, SECONDED BY NS. GABEL, TO RECEIVE PETITION xo. 7-�9$5 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CNAIRWOMAIv SCXNABEL DECLARED THE HOTZOn' CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Crouch stated he understood there were a number of things that could be located on this piece of property: a hotel, motel, restaurant, office buildino. But, again, they did not k�ow what a developer would want to do with the property. Mr, Crouch stated that Mr, and Mrs. Johnson have owned the property for about 26 years and to date with the predominate residential zoning. thev have been unable to do anything with the site. His speculation was that peoDle who might 6e interested in this site would reco9nize it as a likely commercial candidate because of its location, He stated he had read the Citv's Compre- hensive P1an for the 1980's, and it made reference to the highwav interchange and this section in particular. It says this property should possibly be commercial zoning. Ne stated he and his client feel this property should be zoned coirenercial and that hopefully a devetooer and buyer wi1] find a use for it that will benefit the entire City of fridley and its residents. Ms. Kay Ingebrigtsen, 581] West Moore Lake Drive, stated she questioned why this property should be considered a good piece of cortenercial property when there are access problems there already. Mr. Jesse Winter, 5861 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the rezoning of this property to comnercial could only create a greater congesticn of traffic than they already have. There are small children in the area, and he objected to the rezoning request. RLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 24 Ms. Sadie Gunderson, 5707 West Moore Lake Drive, stated she lived right across the street from this property. If this property was rezoned� was there the possibility her property would go commercial as she understood Mr, Johnson wanted to buy it. �'�►• Crouch stated they are not convinced the proposed road layout is the best for this site, and have considered having someone, either Mr. Johnson or the City, possibly acquire homes so the cross street to West Moore Lake Drive could be leveled out. That possibility was a long way from being resolved, and they have no intention at this time of doing that. Mr, Nilliam Kell, 5675 Jackson St., stated his back yard abuts the Johnson prooerty. He stated the use of the road through there was acceptable to most of the residents. He stated he had signed the petition saying he was in favor of the rezoning, but he would like to withdraw his name from the aetition because at the t9me he signed, he did not have the information a6out the City proposaing to cut a road through there. As a solid piece of prropertv, he would be in favor of comnercial use only with a restricted speciai use permit, not with a rezoning, Mr, Ke71 stated he would like to see an adequate buffer zone of trees, shrubs, trees, etc., between his property and Mr, Johnson's and Mr. Johnson signed a paper to that effect. He stated a buffer would decrease the size of that property considerably, and it might not be a viable piece of commercial property. Ms. Schnabel stated that if the street goes through as proposed, artd with adequate screening and setbacks, she also wondered if that would leave enough property to be zoned and developed as comnercial. Mr, Art Olson, 5771 West Moore Lake Drive, stated he was opposed to the rezoning. The residents in this area have been inconvenienced for a long time with traffic from the drive-in, high schoo), middle school, etc. He did not tike the idea that they do not know what would go in on this propertv if it was rezoned, A resident Stdted the City was rpoposing something they did not know about and that was the street reconfiguration. They were looking at the pro�osal for rezoning this wf�ole area to C-2. Without a plan, he felt that pronosal was premature, and he did not think the Planning Corrtnission should take any action on this request at this time. He would oppose the rezoning. Ms. Schnabel stated the only question before the Planning Gomnission was the rezoning, not the street configuration, Ms. Betty Papke, 5801 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the Planning Commission would be acting irresponsibly to acceat this request without knowing what would go onto that property after it was rezoned� and what impact that development wouid have on the neighborhoad. She was opposed to the rezoning. Mr, Ross Haidle. 5714 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that in light of the new proposal by the City to put a buffer of homes in there, he would like to withdraw his name from the petition. He signed the petition prior to knowing a11 the information on what could possibly be done. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1485 PAGE 25 Mr. Joseph Fahey, 5719 West Moore Lake Drive, stated he also stg�ed the petition and would like to withdraw his name. He could not be in favor of a rezoning when there was no plan for property. Mr, Uick Glumac, 5725 Quincy St „ stated he was strictly opposed to the rezoning. The traffic was very bad now, and he did not like the idea of not knowing what rrould go on either this property or the drive-in propertv. Ms. Sadie Gunderson stated she would aiso like to withdraw her name from the petition. Ms. Gloria Hayes, 844 West Moore Lake Drive, stated she was opposed to the rezoning because they have a lot of cortmercial traffic going through there right now. Instead of the drive-in traffic taking the cut-out onto Highway 65, a 1ot of that traffic goes around West Moore lake Drive all the way to Highway 65. If this property was rezoned cortmercial, they would have that much more traffic. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr, Krouch a�d Mr. Johnson if they would like to respond to these concerns. Mr. Crouch stated his client, Mr. Johnson, would like to table this item for 30-bC days in order to hopeFully answer some of the 4uestions and concerns expressed by the neighborhood. MOTSON BY MR, SABA, SPCONDED BY MR, KONDRZCK� TO TABLf,' RE20,4'ING REQUEST� 20A M85-OI.BY GERALA G. JOHNSO:J. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAZRWDMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MO:^SON CARRsED UNANSMDUSLY. Ms, Sch�abel stated this itan would remain on the table until the petitioner requested it be put back on the agenda. 3. FUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST F(lR A SPECIAL USE PERMI7, SP N85-02, BY RDBERTi4��D�5bN�er�ect�on �63'6TT; 3; A; of��e �ria eT-q�ity Code, to a ow-TT�'t e�construction of a second accessory building, a 24 foot by 26 foot detached garage, on Lot 13, Block 3, Brookview 5econd Addition, the same being 6800 Oakley 5treet N.E. MQTZON BY MR. RONDRZCX, SECONDED 9Y AII{, SABA� TO OPEN THE PUBLZC HEARZNG GW SP ttl85-02 BY ROBERT ANDERSON, UPDiJ A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY£� CHASRWDMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE P<<BLIC AEARING OPEN AT 22:20 A.M. Mr. Robi�son stated tfie location of this property was on tfie corner of Oak'ey St, and 68th Ave. The seco�d accessory building will be a 24 ft. by 26 ft. garage to be located on the southwest side of the lot with the drive off 68th Ave. Staff would recomnend the following stipuiations: PLANNING COhiIISSION �EETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 26 1. Set back garage at least 25 feei or obtain a variance, 2. Provide hard surface driveway; curb cut by City. Mr, Robinson stated the petitioner would probably be applytng for a variance to match the garage setback with the house setback. Mr. Anderson stated the existing attached garage wili remain as a garage as he needs the extra garage space. ,YOTION BY MR. XONDRSCK� SECONDED BY HR. OQUIST, TO CLOSE 2NE PUBLSC HEARING ON SP M85-02 BY ROBERT ANDERSON, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLTC HERRING CLOSED AT Z2:30 A.M. MOTION BY MR. OpUIST, SECONDED BY MR. MINTON, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL Of R RE�UEST FOR A SPECIAL USE P£RMIT, SP N85-02, BY ROBERT ANDERSON, PF,'R SECTZON 205.07.1, 3, R� OF THE FRIDLEY CSTY CODE, 2b ALIAW THE CONSTRi1C270N OP A SECOND ACCESSORY BUZLDING� A 24 FOOT BY 26 FOOT DETACHED GARAGE ON ZAT 13, BZ�C7CK 3, BROOKVIEW SECOND ADDISIOti, TNE SAME BEiNG 6800 OAKLEY STREET N.E., WITX THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. SET BRCK GARAGE AT LSAST ?5 FEET OR OBTAIN A VRRZRNCE, 2. PROVIDE HARD SURFACE DRIVEWAY; CURB CUT BY CITk'. UPON A VQICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCXNASEL DECLARED THE MOTIOti CARRIEb UNAIiZMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on April 15. 4. VACATION REQUEST, SAV #85-02, 8Y ARNOLD M. KUHNLY: Vacate the 7 foot drainage and-'ut-iT�ty easment on t�e RortTi si3e o� �f� and the south 2 feet front and rear of Lot 15, Btock i, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, in order to install a driveway and erect a garage on the rear of the lot, the same being 6747 Washington Street N.E. Mr. Robins�n stated this property was located east of Washington St. just south of 68th Ave, 7he request was to vacate a drainage easement in order to install a driveway and erect a garage. The house does sit very close to the lot line (9.7 feeL from the corner of the house to the existing lot line). The existing driveway +�hich comes in and abuts the house is present7y on ±he dratnage easement. 7he proposal was to extend that driveway and build the garage. Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations: 1, A drainage plan be coordinated with and approved by Engineerinq staff prior to City Council meeting. PLANNING CQNIMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PACE 27 2. Neighbor to the north provide a letter agreeing to reduced driveway setback and drainage plan. 3, A new ten-foot drainage and utility easement to be provided on souther]y 10 feet of lot. Mr. Robinson stated all utility companies have indicated they have no problem with this easement. MOTION BY MR. KANDRZCK, SECONDED BY JYR. OQUIST, TO RECOHMEND 2YJ CSTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACATION REQUEST, SAV M85-02, BY ARNOLD XUXNLY, TYJ VACATE TXE 7 FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILZTY BASEMENT QN 2NE NORTH SZDE OF LOT 14 AND THE SOUTH 2 FF.ET FRONT AND REAR OF IAT 15, BLOCK 1, RICE CREEX ?ERR.±CE piAT q, 2N ORDER TD ZNSTALL A DRNEWAY AND fiRfiCT A GARAGE ON THE REAR OF TNE LOT, THE SAME BEZNG 6747 WASHINGTON STREET N,£,� WITX THE FOLLOkI6'G S:IPUZ,hTIO!i5: 1. A DRAZNAGE PLAN BE COORDZNATED WITH AND .tPPROVED BY ENGINEERZNG STAFF PRIOR TO CSTY COUNCIL MEETING. 2. NEIGHBOR TD TNE NORTX PROVIDE A LETTER AGREEING TYJ REDUCED DRNEWAY SETBACK AND DRAZNAGE PLAN. 3. A NEW TEN-FODT DRAZNAGE AND UTILITy EASEMENT TO BE PROVIDED ON SOUTHERLY 20 FEET OF LOT, UPON A VOICE VDTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNASRWDMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSZY, 5, TABLEO 2l27185: LOT SPLI7 L.S. �+85-Q3, BY ROSERT GILSTAD: Split aff e aster y eet, except t e ort r y eet � part of Lot 1, Auditor`s 5ubdivision No. 25 (see file for legal) to be used as a Darkinq lot for the apartments on Lynde Drive (Moore Lake Apartments Complex). This item to remain tabled until 14pri1 17, 1985, at petitioner's request. 6. RECEIYE COtfilI55I0N DIEETI(JG MIfJUTES AND WORKPLAN: MOTZQ'V BY MR. OQUZST� SECONDED 8Y M2, NZN?O1J� TO RECEIVE TXE FOLIAWING: HUMAN RESOURCES Q�NMISSIaJ WORX PZ�AN FOR 1985 HUMAN RESOURCES COAAlISSION MINU7'ES OF JANUARY 31, Z985 BDUSING & REDEVEIAPMENT AUTXORITY MINUTES DF FEBRUARY 19� 1485 ENVSRONMENTAL pUALITY COMMISSZIXI NINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 1985 ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 26� 1985 XUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIAN MINUTES OF MARCH 7, 2985 hOUSING 6 REpEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES OF MARCN 14, 1985 fIPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VO22NG AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOT706 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING CDHIMISSIDN �EETIRG, APRIL 3, i485 PAGE 28 ADJOURNMENT: MOTZON BY Nk. SABA, SECONDED BY MR, NIELSEN, R17 AAJOURN THE MEE22NG. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWONRN SCNIvABEL DECLARED THE RPRZL 3, 2985� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AA)OURNED AT 12:Q5 A,M. � ectfully submitted, � ge5aa Recording Secretary .� �. .•..,,� Apzil 2, 1985 COUNTY OF ANOKA COMMUNITY FiEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOURTHfLOOR COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 Ext. 1390 hbLC Heeitn Nu�smp Semces Env�ro�meniai Heattn Serv�cez MMb� hiCa�t�. Me�ta� RetmClbon. Chemrc�l pepen6enty Semces Commissioner Albert A. Rordiak 1117 43 1/2 Ave. N.E. Columbia Heiqhts, MN 55421 Dear Commissioner Rordiak: F�milY 6 diildnn't Sanita Yoluntxr S�mps Deveiov�+W ACn�evemx+[ Centers This letter is :in request to your information about Anoka County's involvement in the site selection process for a Rule 36 facility. As you are avaree, the Community Aealth and Social Services Department is supporting the need for a A:ule 36 facility in Anoka County. This support is based on the needs detere❑ination canpleted during the past year. It identified the need for a 19 Ded residence to serve Anoka County clients who are using facilities outside of the county because of a lack of any in the county. Through the Req�est foz Proposal process, Community Options was selected as the vendor for the development of n Rule 36 facility. It is the intent of this department t:o contract with them for the pzovision of residential services to Anoka County citizens with mental health problems. The experience of Community Options and theix� program philosophy were major factors in theiz selection. It is the responsibility of Community Options to select a eite for the Aule 36 facility. The county will enter into a contract with them for the provision of services once [hey have screened potenYial sites and decided on and secured a location for th�e facility. Tbe actval site location is determined by the vendor vho must request a conditional use pezmit from t1�e municipality that the potential site is in. This process . has to occur betwe�en Lhe vendor and the municipality. The county is not recommending a apecific site far this facility. We have requested that it be located in an area in *which public transportation is available because the majority of the residents in the facility vill not have private transportation. Once the aelection has been completed, the county vill contract with the vendor for the provision of R�ule 36 services for Anoka Connty residents. I hope this inform:ation will be helpful to you. If there are £urthez questions, please call. Sincerely, eorge . Steiner Director GJS:rv Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer /. ` � �� • ` -� �� L w.,���� �� �� ____--_ :�cr� . '�������h���� — cJriJ� �.�s an/ : e..i�� � ��✓1 L�"Z' J �, / ti,lC..�� �Q.�� � �^�/," r'�'�� I�..�,m� 'r'n D��t�' ��,�. �aN�, � e.vt,'�Z... ..�irk �✓,�� //,y � �' c� fr' �,<< u�. �, � -uiz% m.�. B . e� ,.� �;�flt�lY.i. � �'rt' �'Z2/ Lj'r'�; : �_c_: �� �;� �•� �° ,c�.�".� �,.� � _ �-��.-- �-�-�-�� ��.-�,� n �C7A,�,.,.,t;:.� � �-'.ti��ac..cLSU.c�R.� r'�—�w, �"/ ` 1 �� P-�� � � �-� ��.�" �_w.�___ � � '�/'-�. . ��C.y'� � �� vi/r,�t� �� �� �v � �� ,�� � �"7�' � ���� ��� ziiz /� L�l�.z� < <« � :S i« �, /�j�7 �n/� e�n 2C� S �11��5' !•-��'' �,'����%�c"sa,�� /�:� ��e�'�S �.Ls:.s'�..G- �!`. X:�!�'.,,-[�i� .�i..LL—i �„l..,l � l� � �w1.,,. ��., �.c ���� �c. ,_ , `_ , ; ,'.' C��r-munr� cr��r�7ti� ���r,. f�i'��r.�r�: Ci�� L'�f+x� �Ll�f � �-.�o'Z �FKC� � Mf�� ��5 ��y a � y�' .���• � ss�a s y e c /%C� , h'� ,,�:Z'�. S3I� 5�S ti: �. �5��1 ��,�t ��,�/���-�-�' a��'�/ ��' ��>. � 5f.t` d�1. 7I. £' .-�?z.:,e� 5 sva � �. s.�o o s�' dt� r��;,�;�! _�s-s4z/ sz� sy r.� ,��� r��-s �, z `/�. �/C S� � U 7 �`�+ � V. U J J 1i�. I S3 � a y� ,�'�` � 5�� z/ S3rs Y/'� S� ti�' Ssyz/ S3o� �st�,� s-5 yz� f�� � �-� C.4�, %�� � �.� � _� ��,�i a���K���-a � �,�'�� ��.�_�� ��-� -��s�.:-�y � l�- 1�a�� G�.� �? � � F�,d`� � r S3_5%-,�d�(la.u-/�� �l. � . �:,�'� Shy.S-1 /'`�l��n, e;n.ce. �� j� Pe-C�:e.�C ���e 1�24-� . � ��� SsfSo v��s> t11� 53 �� s�� �� >l �, S3?� � � � 5�� � `2 �`� � • ���e � y a a d'� s`J` W£ �°_'�� s�� 3 y?'�S� 1U� C ��e.- � IC�; 3 CI��� � , �� �� iti�.� e � ��,� ,�.�.. � �c-,l'� 7%1rl1.r-�,,� �� ��� .�,�-'t �;�! u ;.%:,-. . s •t-i� �� ��,� 1 ' 1 ��L �i'�-l���-v'-�" +'�_ v ] , Q .,� ���'�=. . / o a 3 "`a�.-„a .d� 4-,-�� �3Bo ,S� Sr, ti�E ��4a S-�S-�, N��. ��� d y'�.�" st-%�� - �� r �� �, �P �� �� y� � ��, s� �r1, ? � �� �� ��..,,� .� �u�. � $o�� ��� .�� �=, �� ��e� �� < < < � � '�/ . �-C . .�,,.c..,..:,.-, d�',-�'Lr._-�� . . /�,G�Ce �`'� � / 9�cf'� � " - -_. .-- --�._ �ty.,, 9 �' ,.�-�7�__ — -- - - '�. _ c� � �,.J S� �"� /✓� i�� �=1 /� ''a �""c ,��� .,.�..�.,.i S 3 S 3 /i : � `rJ� �-a . �.r�:,d. 7i'?,Q,�'.c--� 7 �Y,� ��c�,c� .�„� . /v � �=:� _��' k: �_� � S� 7� S-�",�i l l(� . � .���t� � .�� �� "�S � �`' d��' � �. , �- " � � _� � s' f' � ���f- � 1,�� j; _ ~ --*� .�:t-.-,�--r _ ,r ..,-�-=.t-�. �.,-- � : i . = � , � .� c �:i a-o.c <� ii..� �'e ; s , � � � ��� � , `' l `( l✓�•. /-._.-- 7Jr� l.,�y.�%�/ �� � �,�� .,�' /: �7 /ry � �Y 7 �'�` !'.�-:.!�>� - n �. /' / ,n ��._"! ��//.� 4 �_ -.f + �/ �/ �/� / '� - ., ,�7 .. ��~� , .,. �l£ ,�-� 'll��� .._ � .�.,��, ;,,,J � s �t�� ��� .���-/�� � �.� , y ..�% �{�t�� z��� (� �� � - >��� 5�s�;x—�"% J L n � 1 �R �(:/'1 �...� � �_ ' . G . 11:i.�.ld 1��5L ..iNL, �f!��i.., ;�::;1: :�./_'\ � � i �:�.�s �rr'�i �Gfo�VE�.Nc��e �FnE�i�P7= ��� �r,o''e/ '.% l� ' / � ? . �, // t�i r� � �J.!�JJ'S � %.h_ - `'ti% `-' � ? �7 : ...L.:.L��-✓- �L.+_.� _.'vl.�Y- � _ . '' � ,�./' ;✓c%� __l..�L �-�-` � � /T ,�.i � ...� " 7 3 4'� �k�-�'.- '�`'- h . ��. � r' . � �"�i� ��j'�i� j�^�/1�/GC/�� �'-lt,, � � 9srr �.P s., _ ,; _ _ _ _ - 1.���?�� �i.� ,�'��-.;�,� %` �.�2��, . , i i - ? �� � ���� __- — - - s'3s�o- ���-1�-� � �-/�'��=���� ���Q,S��L�'.��.,�.. _ _ - _ _ .�� - 6_� � �� � � � , - �- �� � _ _____ _5�3� S'�!__S� �/� /r"�'t% .'�,,%-'- �ri�`� _ _ _ 33��r L � r � � �f'�=r� . . tir �c�. �,�%,• _ _ S� 2 � - S z�" `y� � !=�'� / /, �--� , �-t-l.�y .-CJ� a.-�-rL-�->._ � _� _��C�ft,f� .��__.°�-���,� KeK,�/z ��5 ��� � 5"'� a 3 � r- �r S T � �� ��, �( � / ��.� ' - � ��-'1 y7 ti � �, ,'J.":-, � .� ' ^ � �-G � ; -� .�' �.-ds=. �T �z - — — - f «rCC/ , 3 3 GS S =��` .j' _� � �C���, ; .� 3 �t7 S' �,; �7 i�;,,� ,�;�� ,_-= ::-.. - ,. �9d � � �- .�G ��� � , �� �;= G ��� � sz.,� �� �,�� ��ts r �.���y. � �ck?�v.s- ����F.�k- f�rw!'� �{7l1 / S �C ��9 d .l Qi.�. �cur'.�y rVIEY;�I i��iif� J�k�4Czc[*r'- C�X'''N�'1'1 �t-'�''`'{ l�-�/ C.�.�vC � I / ,--� , � . . �'��.!�-x r�c �����:�a--a��� ��`.�.�� / � �i� � - �! rj �t� � ��� --�`�� ��7Xt� �,,�.�'��. � � , �� G 9�, � ti� � - - f , _ t,� �,.�.��� � � � �1.i wi.�.�,,.,,.� (�.�—cEc�c�—r.. `.�:c: 1 � T,�,f ' —.�... �Z.,��, ,' �� �u���'e., — �..%-��.�J , IC,�r�lA�'� �kMrS-�--- f��_ _,� �� �- '.-� �' .z=�°; .�?� �'- .. N2—� .� �i/.�i�' ��/�' 4../ � /� f �•J��l�-�—..G��tif-v.fK<�LGl✓� � i"� �� �-*� _ . • �-��..L' a �,GE� U ,.�-;,�. �. � � �.�,.���"� �� -�,�,� ��, � .� .. �,��� ��'�`��� �-�iu��`- /'� � `U <:( � C�� _:-�.-� S6 TS` ��� ..+� �c.7�- v l�%'� -C,k , r�'.; t�x %� �� ��� � � �r:� �-� �;_ � ��'�' �a..�l J -+-�'�- i� . � , �' � ' � %' � �-� , ,., �� �,---, , r.: � , , ,s"7i�y C��"/�Zr� .���' �. �� ��� �-,%c..�,����:�,,,c�� �� �. 57 as C�w,�� y ,.- � - _- �� � �� � ; � � ���� W � � G 7 "c� �r- N E ,�=- /' 'f , l T �i �Y % !'. �� �! �—a't" � C �''t / �4�� Lc1� 7w� 1;.E .�,Pa �GF-'� .'�/% E i',-t`=f1E' -'>��r' <�s i ss�, w �� � �:� �:�� ��ii �� ' % %'1 �. , ,�, , / %�` 1� :.�`�;�._ / � � , . - . , . -- � . � ., PUBL3C HEARING BEFORc THE PLANNIM1� COt•1MISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Co�nission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6A31 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 8, 1485 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP N85-03, Fridley Convalescent Home, by Setty J. Wall, per Section 205.07.1, C, 6, of the Fridley City Code, to allow parking lot expansion on Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Manor Addition, the same being 7596 Lyric Lane N.E. 1 persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity �ve stated time and place. Apr•il 22, 1985 Apr�il 29, 1985 VIR6INIA SCNNABEL CHAIRI,'�MAN PLANNING COMMISSION 35 36 5/8/85 ' �GITY OF Fii�iOL�Y� SUBJECi - f�7t UNIVERS�TV AVE NE SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP �i -�b iq1DLEY, MN. C>5a7e t6�21,677-3�60 ADDRE55 S �• G Q0.TE Y^ 02 PLANNIHG COMhlIS:i1 N: APPROVED DISAPPRQYED DATE N0. CITY t;OUNLII: . APPROVED DISAPPROYED DATE NO ST1PUlATIONS: NAME_.�9�rc�kL�tt�'e�.a�?V �.�Q - FEE�RECEIPT NO�� { STREET LOCAT ON OF PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTI9N Of .PROPERTY�,(�{', J����, I 1��Q _�'(j'j�� PRESENT ZQNING CL.0.S51FICA7ION /Q'� EXISTING USE 4F PROPERTY PROPERTY� DESCRIBE BRIEFLY TNE SPECIAL USE APPLIED FOR: Section of the Nas the present applicaat previausly sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or speciai use permit on the subject site or part of it? ____,yes no. What was requested and when? '�� 1eaG The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of ali residents and owners of pra�er- ty within L00 feet wi9) be attached to Lhis application. .. �' � � '(b) This application must be signed by a17 avners of the propepty. or a►+ exp7anation given why this is not the case. (c} Responsibility for any Jefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to . list the names and ,addresss of all residents and property owenrs of propgrty in question. belongs t�� the undersiqned. A skeLch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the following: 1. Nort:h direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of pr•operty, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. L»cation and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersij�ed hereby declares that all the facts a�d respresentations stated in this application �re true and correct. DATE �i1��"� a -/��S SIGNATURE _y�� �p,{y- C�o,��� �f���. � �DDRESS 7Sy'e�C�,��— �iLcd/4.1,,,,, ___ _ TELEDHONE NO 786 - 774v SP k85-03, Fridley Convalescent Nome 754Q Lyric Lane N.E. North Suburban Hospital Unity Hospital 550 Osborne Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Attn: John Haines Planning Commission April 1�, 1985 3� City Council MAILING LIST District Mr. & Mr.s Lloyd Larson 7549 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Highland Park Development Co. 540 Greenhaven Road Anoka, MN 55303 R. J. Rupper, C. A. Lowe and Culer E. LaSalle 620 Osborne Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 PDQ Stores of MN, Inc. 3310 University Avenue Madison, WI 537Q5 Mr. & Mrs. Bruce Barsness 7589 Lyric Lane N,E. Fridley, HN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Nielsen 7583 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Witliar� Orr 7577 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ptr. & i�irs. Jerome Ruhn 7573 Lyric Lane N_E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ms. Janice Carroll 7567 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. b Mrs. Dwight 8e91au 7563 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fir. & P1rs. Harley Thureen 7559 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridi!ey, MN 55432 Mr. & Mr. Denis Christianson 7553 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Urbin Mayer 7445 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. William Schocinski 7539 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ptark Kennedy 7534 Tempo Terrace N,E. Fridiey, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Lowell Erickson 7536 Tempo Terrace N.E. fridley, P4N 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Westeren 7530 Tempo Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Howard Rassier 7540 Tempo Terrace N.E. fridley, MN 55432 P1r. 3 Mrs. John Podeszwa 7542 Tempo Terrace N.E. Fridley, NN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ted Quien Jr. 7544 Tempo Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Noei Hanssen 7546 Tempo Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. James Klingle 7548 Tempo Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Tim Breider 7550 Tempo Terrace N.E. Fridley, tiN 55432 F.M.C. 3� Associates 7675 Madison Street N.E. Fridl ey, MPi 55432 3d SP #85-03, Fridley Convalescent Home 7590 Lyric Lane N.E. Pa9e 2 Mr. & Mrs. Philip Burns 7600 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Vernon Buchli 7618 Jackson Street N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. R. J. Zembal 7634 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Brian Kocher 7650 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Gilbert Flaig 7580 Jackson Street N.Ec: Fridley, MN 55432 Betty J. Wall Fridley Convalescent Home 7590 Lyric Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 � ��.��r��a• � r ,1k,'i Y HOSPITAt / x ' a - � , . �� �. � � . �L_1<1� � �� ., �l �) ' s ` r g� � , ` . ., � f� �, � � ��� _— � � . ,�_'1- I .__"� � � J r---.l , CITY ` i _ 6 7590 Lyric Lane Pl.E. T�P[����f'► , � � �!_i��»-���..-�����-�_�_ 1 ' 1 ��W „I 'tQ"� r''--{�[,��--J�i*��_-� • t lf�M r', 1 3�, _, • � • r , , r• ti� � ,�-� : � u�'• • •�• i :��! a f �CH� , ".'',� olt� i�� � f � � �I ,; ao � . , , . • , ,, I � .. � � . s��p�. �.� t..� r � Y t �, '.��p� 76TM. RVE. i l: ' , , ss I i� • �`"� �.( T �j,\ �� � m /1 i S IY� II' S��'L-a�{y{, � _- -1- 1 �4f•.'}.. �� ��,1. � � I�� .� ' .l ,p .f � ` (a1 i' .►-�L' � :• � s � •,v - ,�• .i , el.� , , '' .s r - � ], r �s'rH avE. N E. ,� > ' f. ; r e: , �- ,� , ' ir -i ---- ..�. W� ' i� �z , /�.- ., � a ; , :� e � �� `\ � � �p� � f 2. f I'-..�. 17� \ l��-�y-p . � 2 . • :S� t •:..:-' � A�r �'�i: � � - ^ ` ! ^ " t• v k-� \ �- � I! � �J7.`.� �` � ✓ ~ � . ' I,.•C. / ^� � w �� � � ! � !I � ' �' � '�((( \. � r -- —4- W : � v� j. ' �'�. .J T. , •• �.ai.� MAASEN � � � t, � .. �?�. `' � � ro�� • �1��' � .. �t �'�� � J ... A �4qh � � �' . •- �'1 � � � � - �... ��i _ 7'f R� AVEN' 95 � ' � �� .{ !i�' � �,��' .1 .f �? . i.�2� ��. n^p°O!C ". ' "' '.'c._c '° :`!�^:"'> ^^� co c�e '_ _..-:�.__��&�.''�" ^.o 0 ' "_ j,'^,,. co .'.' "^c e' ; - '3 ..=—�����c_c c,�,� �ti , � ^, � _ '� ' -: _ ��. �.. - �''}``-'- ---__ _ _�1��_ _ - �^� c _o a�o _ ,00c��°_, ' c ��� _ `c ^ � �.'�t.'_ " p ^o _ � e ' : l�r""'o . ...°�- ' °'^'- �y%' '^ n^o^^no ^I / ' " ^_^^o^^e^_ ^ _ �����n� � � � �^. Ff�___E�_^' ^'c ___ � HZ • �� =///1 i�/�� ;. i h� J; O� 2i �� � M; � �Y�'_'��� _� '�':__a__._�41�� G_ --� 4 j�-_ ///// i � a �//// �� � �� � , �� �f^' � � �`' -�iii� � � � � b '� �3 ' � �' � � ` �. ..o ° % ' � �`') E, E ,� �; � Q � . � G� ° .3� �;"' y—� .�' �� f, ,�i -�.; �,� s� ��� .�� /// , � -�� � ' ° �_3 � � �. ` .._ a �.:3 •� `� -F.��� —E; —� f—�,, � �.f"': ,`��€� {^�\ � o ,� v \ Fv �"'_ �^' _� � / �`. - � , � � / , . � � � � ` ' �' �. �:,' , � ' � �•—G � � . `` �� t tN %�� �is. _r_.�. �'` � � , • GI� � � � / �� � _ ,_ �' •C) \! � r � � ' G • � � ` 9 r � c7 ,i S �i � i � _ / �.. � � i� � �5 { . �� � � iL`� '� : �. � • s • Z �� / N l0 0 z > 3 z _ ��� ; �. 7590 Lyric Lane N.E. Q� � � _� .,. . ,,,, �85-0 �i . . _ ' . :" ���� �� _ ,. _ - STATE - AIt3 - NIG!{WAY -$ . � ---z��- "''-`'"r- - ---� - _ ----Y— . .. . . ,. �+ �{ •�!1 " '�' __ . .MA PL E a f '° ti=" '` �.,......�" i3o-i50 •„r,,et ,.1. �•� .. . /, ,�. _..�. � r `� ..s� ... ' � i i t - _ � ito- {:- ta � a . _ . . �� . ....'.i � ♦ � t. , t'°t t ; �;;.. _� �1 ��... ��� ,,.. . TK3 �a�� i�c: .�.�-�� ;; -�; ,� M NOR , � 3 : ��.� ,w ':'` ;�"$* t. . ii �7b � '�r:.T �ca i ��o � t a ' �,,., .-' �1{ L� 1 �l0'�10 .K� _r �7�>> 1L . . � • i { •;t F � r. 5 - � . t �� rr'�e'[ �� . lL � 1 � �! � . . ' . ��, . � � t •9�1��� i� � i • • i • _ !�� • ;�o — - . . �� � • � = ' i��• 7b �' ), ' a ` ♦,���il �� / i• i.ib . � . i1'�i i i � _�—i T� 7i�� ,� � �J� i�'i�� +�y1i'1"�r�� , r : b �,. .pvyJi/rn4r p�N'�✓ ' : ~ - ' . OwA'il// j� � _ � I//- . ���r+ . lSE� �lSl3 j� � -, + r r ��✓ `� S {: 3 2 3 �- ,i . I ,�yi. lbfi� Ta�7 7sq� �► •°ss° , M� p'�`'y►��►� �r'�"i: -tsil s�l� 7s� S° �,Nn Ts�La� 7� c �� 12 �5�� '1Y� Y r" b�+ �O '� )a >! � f0 4/ w sf P�`. r��. 's rw a r1S� ��! l y . Y n,�� 7�. `G \, 15 N S��'�' � -ys�s ���?�,. ,-^�• � .' ' � � � _ • u � ,,, ,�l .' �� ,�z � �." E � .. ; . ..� ,.< ,s:, � r'r i 'Q1' ♦ 14 .! Ei AC .. ; r�Y � � 544 . ; �s t � .Jr ' ,�st . '{s �,',,r • � � E� . ,,.- ` s s . � z ti ' �_ .. ,�� `� t+ �j Y ► � . /� ♦ �, .�a�y l5 "SCf � Sto �S�S a 1 � �y'b^y2s. Z' �r+�" t� '4s"y� M�'TS�� �� i,.r+ 4 ��1lSb �490 7�1� 7�98 �9 t `/J � z`'�' -�µzs i�7� gI, 35 3s -• ��' � � n q �3) ! y,.. ,soi '7 �`►00 ��I � � r �'b• 70 �) � I� �r rM1? �0,; i�i ' /4 ^ =i � • I,,,� Ai= ..���'�o R `VG � • .r �.,� -r�is.i . � s •:'' � � �`' {is � �MELp9��'I�R ;., �;i� �.i�S`'`• N � �o,'. ,� � - ���! � y Z� �r �.�`rj Z 2 i s, i..a =:z �l�A �A�t Z! yAr � �++ �'6�1 , 6!� � � _ 3 ;. _, 7�fz .y, Ar ..: 3� �A ie'� �+•ti�'�*� 2` � � ►1 �� 4�, '' ,yf; Z4 ii '7,�0 ��!� �1{55 � f �,� Z `7� . i 7� � � � I'' ���0 ,�,.� 4Z � j � `+!' Y,{ O 7�S o '�hta 2� r'' f � �•S � ��toMr ," "'r •� CONCERTO CU V E; � Y � % �_.b � .r.i %Z,�S , . �p !i . � r,r .+' • ? e' ...v • ��Q -�4 � I ). z _ 2t � " 1" .�a.. ,ti.�pv !1 I'� ,�ie� "�j�+t �t .�' �/ 0 ; / Qo~ `'!� � .f,�r t � ' � � A. ry ..r �� �A� � ?'� S 1f ,., �rs rr: 2�47 M ,� ��.� is�{a 7 f; J 1 , � ���� �W3 7�ro �+t� � . .i- 1f a 4 _ j4�t �1 �3Pb 3 iv— � t90 Li 2i 7�0 7 f 1 IO �� ..� ' - � :.nczY s �,- LANE ; s' ,15-f , .. � r�,� N = I ,�,�. . �sb� � �'� •�.• "'� � , ... -_ . �rkin� ci�y �oM�e.�� �cen of}� Madiso�j Il�lA'C1fe �are[9Pr F � .. . = • � •- —= � - —� : jJ I�� � � V � ' �: = � • �c � os�.----'Ti'---- '�� / / /��_C.T-�t ' i i / � � � �F E . j., --�/ /%`/. � ; _ 4r —'-�-�' , �\�\�.���- 7590 Lyric Lane N,E. SP If85-03 � M :� � _'-' � �`� !i ='r . —'--'---- �- '* :t cz . ' •. i •- r---'�-� - 0� � � � I � � ia : � i �`-___--=�=--1 i ' ..� � � ��-i �� ! 1...__,,,..s�.., ` '�' � `�-' � � � �, �--�`r—_ _; i ; `'� ► � i F + i � ; � 1, a � } 'I 1 �± �� —�—� I , 1\'�\ I i � � � �. i � ` J , i--- � � �, � f. : «� �Pi►'� f! �1��4�� No �5s �' . L.yrrG 1-R . � i p � �� � ; � �1 �� ��� , �, `� �� 1 � � � �+ , �,� �; � �n � i -----, ► \;�::� ; � ��, �. � , Y _, � � �. � , � � s � - � `� 1 � � `� �—u `� ,� �1, ' �� � ,i \ , , � � __=--____-== - - -__==__�. -- - --�: � - -- PUBLIC HEARTNG BEFORE THE PLANNIN6 COhtMI5SI0N Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Cortonission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 U�iversity Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 8, 1985 in the Council Chamber at 7:3Q P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP �85-04, 6y Lance A. Lindman, per Section 205,07.1, 3, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 20 x 16 foot garage, to be used for storage of a classic car, on Lot Z6 and the North 25 feet of Lot 25, Block 16, Plymnuth including the vacated alley, the same being 4565 - 3rd Street N.E. Any and el� persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCH�dAEEL CHAIR6'OMA�� PLANNING COMMISSID�� Publish: April 22, 1985 April 29, 1985 42 i . ��g^ �s C17Y OF Fq1�LEY. 6a3� YN�VFwSiTY AVE. NG Fi710LEY. MN. 65e32 [61�I,S7�-�� Su6.lECT SPECIAI USE PERMIT 43 SP��� ADDRESS Li S�o S 3 rZ Q. S T-, - N� W1TE ���F s PLAMNING COMM155ION: APPROVED DISAPPROYEO DATE N0. CITY COUNCIL STIPULATIONS: AGPROYED DISAPPR�YED DATE NO NAME {.- A ht CE A L'�N D M A N FEE /o �` RECEIPT NO ��a �� STR�ET LOCATION OF PROPERTV �-F�j(o S � e-cL S i� I�l E' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF.VROPERTY 0 � l.� PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION (�C - � EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY �e S c�� ACREAGE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE SPECIAL USE APPLIED n �I J — CA� Sect on of� t e C�ie: a-o��( /� ! Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permtt on the subject site or part of it? __�yes x no. What was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a} A list of all residents and owners of prover- ty within 200 feet wi11 be attached to this apptication. _. '' ' � '(b) This application must be signed by a11 awners of the property, ar an exp7anation jiven why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any Jefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to . list the names and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of prop�rty in question. belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the foltowing: i. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Oimensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings {within 350 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and respresentations stated in this application are true and DA7E � p� S 1985 SI ADDRESS Li 5(o S 3tLC� ST 1Yc . TELEPHONE NO S7�- I S7� ■ SP �85-04, Lance Li�dman 4565 - 3rd Street N.E. John Dzubay 4519 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Ricky L. Okerstrom 4537 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Gordon R. Peterson 4555 - 3rd Street Fridley, MN 55421 Lance A. Lindman 4565 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Darleen D. Grosz 4575 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Robert R. Archer 4595 - 3rd Street N.E. fridley, MN 55421 Synoeva Reno 4590 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Charles D. Howe 456D - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Lemoyne M. Jorgenson 4544 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Howard J. Friis 4538 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Theodore G. Meinders 4526 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 John A. Kaminski 4578 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Loren D. Smerud 4603 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 44 Plannin9 Commission��ril 17, 19R�_ City Council MAILING LIST Steven E. Renkert 4539 - 2 1/2 Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Bradley F. Gavanda 4551 - 2 1/2 Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 James R. Heniges 4561 - 2 1J2 Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 William D, Camp 4571 - 2 1/2 Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 John A. Boucher 4591 - 2 1(2 Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 . f. �: - 1,� �, r' �,. 3 c -- . � r � �t�`i@� �.r_.a 4565 - 3rd 5treet N.E. 1 6 � -� �� ' �*!5 4� : {��� �: , . � .._.. „ ��,at „ -• � �' �i 3 .< ls -'-;r�s _'. +Yt . �� • �� �� � � � �� _. _ ysM�� - • . t' _ ! :� '�' , . --' --r�' I ?r _' �. : � � ._ ..� :. � �. ---��� - - 3� . �. Y�L .�, � — '� � i� � -' _�. „ K i x ' o _. w !' � . . d : ?! a tt l. n� F-- - s I� _ i� � p _ _`�� � � R"� i ': ; __ � � _..� t-. _ � -} ., 4 r..,�, , . _.�f.J � , J � �`��1 � s , x <<.ss, _ �_ �,-, -• � -�--� --- N • �;�{�I � � `�� �� ♦ r e _ _ a - --d . _ ,ra __� �.; , �,� b�t. i ! _ ";� 4 • A ... .O 1 ;_i"= �t� -— s _ ti : � ,,.�o �: = f' ', � � iNw? : . "r , 2 l�� (/t 7 " : ".'�`_' r _� ' __— �I � ��_f ��_. �� 'Y . i , { �, i � � ,,,,� c iJ+o � _ ._..�_ � _ • . - - ! -Y-- �'� �_sX� � � �I � . rw+ �,��y "' � ' !'.i"✓T.f . -~T' �t .��. Gwr� 4565 SP # z x a � � � Z � � ' <9TN avENUE ' � _ h - � ' � '_ � � W _ K _ � . �- a. . ._ � .. _ o +��E' - �' '�'. `" — - �� - - 'M ♦.EhU - t - �= _X- - - at H nyENUE � -_ _ __ - _ _ �� �� e� a� i �� � ■ v�� � r-�� r3 =�F=� � �� E�� �E T 3.�;�=� Q - ��- � � � �� � � �'� ~ 1� _ - ;tE6 � o. � = � �._� ' -` ��� S�.Iy.3�E N.€_ _ - - .'.i'. -� _.�. _ _�___,= r_� � : .\'. "_ ' � � __ -ti '��� :.\. ..._ �_� + � _� '.�'. YC. . _' _ _ •�t•• ' _ _ __ _ t. f.' "' - __ _ �2'. .. _ ___ � E -7C= � _ r' _ � J—� _ – W �V s.i > ' .- - a �. _ — -_� �_ vE �--- � �--- ��Q : _' _ � � =� � '— , � r" T _ � O �: j - .�_ - � C� o� � x > �,� . : _ _ .. _ , - ,r._� ��� � T � I ... _� ; Q� � � ., - �-'� ( I . 4 �` � � � =� ���f�i� � ZONING MAP inra n cniit,sor+, ra6s. wwtsr �ianctneEt .� �. • ,w, • SURVEY FORS )RDON R� PE7ERSOi+1 � �� � �� � M �� �i Z � J� � �?' O � � 41 V � �� � Z � � � _i CERi1FfCAi. Ot SURVEY �� �,�,��,•�► ;,,.�v LAND 51v �YORS lic�n�ed. In�ur�d i Bond�d ,s j i✓.. iss: S , , 1- . . -- ��/,/o- - ------�- .r s ' i � i in � ,yS�� -�� � �, . �+� r. . ��, � � `�y Y ✓ �l i / ��t �r � : `► _' � '^ /2 ,�i � I 'l. ' �; � O O � V '� �. � : 0 �•�r� � Q GAia �. t+� — /`•j0� , ILEQAL DESCRIPTION:� i6; PfiYMOU7HMIMCOUDMNOSALLEOFOTHEOAI?EY VACAT[D• i1C MEREOY CERTIiY TNAT THIS IS A iRUE AND CORRECT REPRCSENTATIOK Of A SURVEY Of TME tiOUHDAR{ES OF i1tE IAND ABOVE DESCRIOCD AND OF TIIE LOCATION Of ALL BUILDINGS� IP ANY� TNERE0�1� AND ALL VISIBL[ CNGROACHlIENTS� IF ANY� FR011 OR OM SAID LAriD� AS SURVEVED BY US TN{i ST►t DAY Of DECEKBER� 1974. House location — Ravember 2, 197b• V . • , • • 5 4�`� _ � AI►xw. Reo. 1io. � �, � r ,�;. . , . _ �_.-- u � � � PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNIN6 CDI•1MISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Corrnnission of the City of fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 8, 1985 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Proposed Preliminary Plat, P.S. #85-01, Landmark Addition, by Robert J. McAdam, being a replat of Lot 5, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 77 described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of Osborne Road, as now laid out, with the Easterly right-of-way line of Northern Pacific Railroad; thence Northeasterly, along said centerline of Osborne Road, 436.5 feet to the point of beginning of the property to be described, said centerline has an assumed bearing of 51°03'20" E, thence N 15°40'00" W, a dsitance of 436.5 feet; thence N 18°05'50" W, a distance of 596.44 feet to the North line of said Lot 5; thence N 89°51'31" E, along said North line of Lot 5, a distance of 180.91 feet; thence S 18°05'S6" E, a distance of 903.92 feet to said centerline of 6sborne Road; thence 5 51°03'20" W, along said centerline of Osborne Road, a distance of 203.87 feet to the point of be9inning. Subject to 77th Avenue and Osborne Road. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be give� an opportunity at the above stated time and place. YIR61tdtA SCH'dABcL CHk I R'�'�JMFfv PLANNING COMM15510N Publish: qpril 22, 1985 Apri} 29, 1985 43 �; /. C� . �� :i� �. GtTY DF F:al01..<Y. i��1 YN�VEwL�TY Ar� NE FR106�Y, MN. 6��� K�.67'�•�4f0 SUBJECT ZONING ACTION YACATION PLAT ZOA /�_ � SAV f — � PS # ° - ORDINANCE NO_^_____._— PUBL15HED ___ � :�. . I1ppRESS ND._�,� DISAPPROYED �TE yND READ_r_ p�ANNING COlMISSION: APPROYED __,.._ 15T RFJ4D�— CITY CpUNUL: VIfBLiC KEARING DATE�— NO,�__ CITIr COI�ICIL: . APPROYED DISAPPROYED �TE PAID PARK FEE REQUIRED: ��T STIPULATIONS: � fEE O `—° REGEIPT NO /,2� � 7 >.l� aµ _ _ . , r f STREET LOCATION OF PROPEx n � � LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4� PROPER7Y r 34 — %7— ._� PRESENT 20NING CLASSIFICATION%ExISTING USE df PROPERTY L�� ! ACREAGE OF PROPERTY j_ �_ S� �SCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATIDN OR TYPE Of USE AND INPROVEMENT PROPOSED Has the present applicant previously sou9ht to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split nr� variance or special use per'mit on the subject site or part of it? ��_Yes� What was requested and when? `_ The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and ovmers of proPeT'' 15cation. (b) This appiicat�on must be signed ty within 350 feet rtust be attached to this application (rezoning), 300 feet, p at- t;rg), wj1] be attached to'this hPP {c}aResponsibilityhfoPra�yrdefect in the1Proceedingseresuitingsfrom tfie fa�luin to . list the names and addresss of all residents and property or+enrs of prop� Y question, belongs to the u�dersigned. A sketch of ;rop�s�T�hPa}re tionnd 2truLocationsofbtherp oposedastructure onWthe lot. fol�win9: r ro osed structure, and fron and side setbacks. A� Street 3, Dimensions of prope ty. p P ��s, 5, location and use of adJacent existing buildings (within 350 feet . t ted in The undersi9ned hereDy declares that all this application are true and correct. DATE � `��-- the facts and respresentations s�Jc,�r,�M �� u�' /%/�`l�!r' � , TELEPHONE NO / �,. �t r �'Z � Effective January 17, 7984 1984 POLICI SfASf}IENT ON YAA6 FSSS ON LAIiD SUBDIVISION i �� � � � Date _ � � �~ t� In determining fair market value of public areas for land �ubdivision for cash payment a� required by Ordinance i633� the following values xill be uaed: Residential Subdiviaioa 51,500.00 per lot Aeaidential Lot Split 3 750.00 per lot Commercial/Industrial Subdiviaioa or Lot Split = U•023 Per 89• r� This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split epproval. The City Council may 6efer collection to the time a Duilding permit Sa reQuested for individual lota created by such subdivision/lot aplit. The Clty retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion reQuired to be dedlcated. PIAR FEE AGREEl�NT The undersigned understands that according to Lhe City Pla'ting Ordinance, the folloving public park land dedication is required to plat resiEential, commercial or industrial zoned properiy. It ia further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment eQuivalent is at the discretlon of the City. It ia agreed that a cash payment of � �/ � 11 De paid according to the above atatad policy for the following subdivisionllot ap1iL. It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the above atated policy for the folloxing subdivision/lot aplit: Dedicatioa: SubdiviaionlLot Split The underaigned further agrees to ootily all future property oxners or essigns of the caah payment requirement, 1f it ia to be collected at the time of ieauaace of a building permit. Date: `� �h ���� 3/0/B/8 � fT : / J f /` _ � � — (Propertp Owner Signature) P5 #85-01, Landmark Inc. 30 - 77th Avenue N.E. Robert McAdam 7580 Alden Way N_E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Harris 62�0 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Oennis L. Olson 1131 8rookdale Drive Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 Francis Anderson 7748 Elm Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Raymond E. Meggitt 3514 Lake Elmo Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Oscar Carlson 7733 Beech Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ronald L Cerinske 7713 Beech Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Edward L. Willey 7701 Beech Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Laverne M. Rhodes 4017 Kentucky Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55427 Mary B. Novack 21 - 77th Way Fridley, MN 55432 Nancy A. Johnson 19 - 77th Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gary N. Johnson 8200 East River Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Paul V. Schultz 7751 Elm Street N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Paul Y. Schultz 11040 Cottonwoad Street Coon Rapids, MN 55433 51 Planning Commission APril 17, 1985 City Council MAILING LIST Ra�ders & Sigel Co. 731 East 14th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Frank Associates 300 First Avenue North MinneapoliS, MN 55401 Consolidated Container 735 - 3rd Street North Minneapolis, MN 55401 Gazda Storage 7580 Commerce Lane Fridley, MN 55432 Real Vest Company 4901 F Street Qmaha, NB 68117 Earl A. Patch 3201 Rankin Road Minneapolis, MN 55418 William A. Zbikowski 7500 Commerce Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Marquette State Bank 5250 Central Avenue N.E. Columbia Hei9hts, MN 55421 Fridley Limited Partnership 530 Parkland Place 1666 So. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Hinrichs Propertie5 220 - 77th Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55442 � r—�—��— . . , ,:, ^� � .~�b _ .'rf.' .�a , " ' . :. T � `�i �Y �,-��.•�JL •'»y`. '.'. ... . S". f:��,f ' - . ` ^ r � � _. � ` ' ^ _.-} ""5 � } 'S � �i� tOR�s ..., � _q�_ � �i t; �i 4 � °��G 4 � �� , i�• � , .`� L 2 '� � � -S��p�v � � � s -' .� E �— - — — — �` , ,_ . � : �� � :• . a . ' �� • ����_ �.�. _ - �..- _.. ....�_ � X30'-. �7th Av�11��1�..% s� +o� '; 5, .- o s " �n�_nt« _-�' . . ' � .. � =� �.{. � . :SY� ' .. � � .i :,� - ; �- ► s�: � ft��CH r . �; �. ��t �'��• � � � ' 71 `� i � i :AS Fs f� -" � .L ; _ ' 29 � �,�� . ,� � . �� '::' " eb� . ,_. ,� �p 2! - ��h *��•--. ti ::;';� �i�sa� . �,�:.�'�.�� ��_�+ ;:-� . ' �.� .. � � � , -:� . , , . � a `.,� ��� =;rs �. _:�� . -�.- l �T�,= - .. - _ , � � t, . - I f' ..":'�i'�+r;»'=��s`^''=+Yif":, ' .e _ _. .. � � ;/}001 � :t. �':. �:2 - ,' ti .. . � . , � .- s �Si�`- - . �:i -� G�,• ¢� �': a. z t „ ..:�-, � - . _ . . .. ; � � . , i ".j . ��.4 ,�ci � n..:i. ' - .. I - - ------ —� r :, : I .. �i't r_._. ... . — � � _vk`.ii` �.... Y . �� , � � „ .I ., .. � �c� r . r . .1 � � 4 �• � ' t ".:T _ . .. '.. Y! �{ =s� y ��u . r . , _ 0. , � s�, .. �, ��; . � ��,,�, � � � ` �.. � ; �e000) 3 " ,r_ ¢xr� .r.� r tir.::��.-:; , , , ' • , � ,.�.i- �c. c�< : . � ��-.�-��= �,� �`"'�'� • . � � � •s�' � �' � .�r ��;3.- . « ,,,:.i��s,,ti �, .s '. � , I '.� r • .ui "�! • 3 .�. , ;_"�. ,Y',. �a. ..y � . -_ . - ._ '_ d Y r{,,,,: �; � ..�-� :- .. . _ � 7j (�,i a�•+ �g � a �.e :. ; , Y� i=T � I � � �� �.., .�- e./� ;':lL _ � � -, r' . ��� K.:.. � .� ` � � _ . r� �' �(. . s .,. .J - . --_ - 74' -.:ti vt+.,�,: ,.�_ �.= {�z�� ! r��so i � � � . LOCATION Ap_�1��'O°� � ,�� � s , --------- a _-'�"' n � . ..�.� ::,r: s�� :. ��i .'�_''���iT j.'_ ,,�/350� M, �.... l:s; � ` � ,150 j ,� �� �� � L . . 3 ' _ . _. � � � ,_.4.i��SOi "-`24 7��, p , D _ st � .� (itoc �' 23 g-' ;. ' : �_lf�l7 �• ' ri jisc, `� ' zz 73f1 ���x `a'! �/� d .� 6 ��j` Y � l/ � !// --� z 0 �`1e �Z / 6 W z � K Z I 6� a sTa ° . •i t � - �- �� -!,~� •����;•: '• ..�• • L.• . • . • �. • • • • • • • . • • r • • • • • • • • ����'�F� •��_��• • • • • • y + � � • • 4 1 � � I •,�:•�Q.•P� '. .'�n9 '•. : �'� ... ,.�.;.Rd�.;., `��, • ., . . . . . .� , ..... � .�• • r�'• • • .d• • • ri, � �� . . . a',_�. . , .Tft7A� ;� . \'��i'� • • s � %. �. ... , ....� .. � • :,��' /� � % ••• `. �a �� j •.. . .� � � . - , � �,� �� � n� . � . i � �� dQ7 � R �\ ii* JlY�Y44- � , � L � �: . 9 . .�..✓ o , � ' 4 � , �, , • . � � ` � , �, �Q� a w"��.t :, ! � ; � ' �ti : � , �s, _ � / , - i 1. G'p �' � . ' / ;,��.` � ` j a� -' � � t ' + p��[r+r • �I'�'; , ' �i � I � i % � s' � ' t��-- , - , : �; . �. � . I ��►1 • ' " ` � :� , �, �N �� s �(�,� ���~ �p� � � � � �f 2 �� � J. � . �d,. 4_ \ . . � E 4�'� _ ' � ; . ' ' t� :� P� , � • � iP M � � � t f ' . � : � ' �� 1 ERS�P�'NF . 3s 1 �� AK� CfiEfK- � K 9 f.. \} � / ODL�U4�T£2 7 N E i h � i 4i2 1 � z � �� ~ ��_� W � a �� � � �� U �1 I , I � .— ; _�:, < ,pT � 5'� ;. • ..i p i �� � �':� : :+. � ZONING MAP -- :.-�T,,:z:-------- .— --- _�_ �n r.i :.—wav_ � —_ • r�."(..i,p,�� __Tr__'__'��__ 1_,-__'__ ",'1�'_ � ;^ � ; 1 � � 1 h 2 Y z 0 �� .` 4 - `�� • �� 1 < ��� i � :w .n � `p0 "4 '� � p.. � �` � m � �_'_ r �' � � /� � 1 1 � . I � � P r b n '. x n Z O 0 • �, .� O 0 p� t 1 , � � E1;, � ``` 1, ,�� �`` ` L� � O �� \ �l """ 30 - 77th Avenue N.E. P.S. #85-01 f' O 1 /'�p b � 1 / �'� � t� ` , ti'r � / � :,�; j. � , �,a�'''•+ �,• ,� o�� i�� . j'" e°,,�d ��+ .' aI'' f� � � ' / /' �� -� / j i�'�jt%� // i , / ° � `� e /�/ A+ a s I i �w � � e a 54 0 z L z i � � � � t— -,=5 P ! Nl� � � "�'—� �,.. '� 1 w w :Ffi: �.�.+�.J� t!I[ $ � �e P; _'�i� r�-'H � 1 : � . �li 6 � : __JF �: i i ''^ �� x3;i3 ��i i j : 7� 2� i!'.i W ¢ t. `e � �1— li._r G � � N %i'.: .I •\' -.# N � ' s I '� I I il iI\'� '� I �} I = I I�I j i\�\ � �. � ��� . _ , � ;��€ i ;���� � � ,� ; I I: ;' t ' � � . � ;, � I � � , ��� / 1,1 � /� _ : �: _ � �o �I = ZW �� a vUi � �.� � , s 7 � � I 11• '� ' a \\ � \ i• f I � =\ � //r .a s .� i 1} i 5 ' � /� t �; L , �e = i i � ���i '� I �--T� j / , �cr E �'nJ � � �ws '� b� ' 'l � i J� I �: �,�_��P`L`�": k /� _� � � � � � s, ; � Ropo G a <`° /� % / ' • � / epRNE y e � pS : =: � a:=: � [�i? / 30 - 77th Avenue N.E. 75 P.S. k85-01 �f �^ .�� �r y � a � - i' � i � � � � i ��..'�, > Y J I. � �. III��.����.f.�' i .�`j 'E ��3 . �� : 0 ► < > r F t i O F f Y Y J Y Y O � M \ J 30 - 77th Rvenue N.E. �6 P.S. �85-01 I '. I � ! I O 1 , T— � J ( � i � � � �. I ; �1 � I' o; �el � 3D - 77th Avenue N.E. P.S. #85-01 � r _ _ _ - ___— _'_ -_Ft4:�'�. ._ _._._. _ _ I f: . D' 431KfLDC i Sptp�(yM1.SLD[ � �A ____. I�r^��*� ' L �: . �' ' t _ I I L'J1—�J s►� - �oi I eeoaoor ��_�. r I,•�.coCD : `fo'e`w� suc�`c°" e�rH � �_ I� J ��_ _ _ [ . � ' I 1 � ,,' � � � � �S_o { 2_10 N I ( ____ i I � _ _� �., :� � � � � �I s, i I � I �� � f� � -- s�s __�� OF—. F�CE � o ..� .�� s� �; - -- – � ----� —�-- � � M A I N 1. E V E � .�.�. ; K17� , , � '� I - � ° O� '�DECK �� _� I I � �� �i'.o � p• � I •►- _'� OINETTE �4 f I I j : � I 4_4' t.s' �_�• S fI . � I �! I j�� O� i r r� � __- - --� � -� � n � � r �� « .� i:' � o � --- � � h; ---- J �r� 1�►llT. I W t � � �p� O N__ _.____ . _.___ _"_ i __ "lb Ruuu6� — — — —' — . n I �NI [OOC Tt�SSff I `� . Z{��. � � N I �I � LIVIN6 ROOY I IZ—'—'--_I I i i �� -r ' o' io � p —��! Q� I !II =_�_—= Ll S� ♦ M. SLL� I � LOO R P L A •• . ,•_,- 57 30 - 77th Avenue N.E. 7� P.S. #85-01 r�nuc i�'.o. � �=._b.. �II•.0• i_p• I I —^r------- —�---- --- --- � � � �r ------- �— --�-----� ' _�}�� -�� �w f � I I� .l, 1cuEE�.lil� ou I � c s.��: s,� I I' � a.e wr xis. � �c a cou: i.r �.�•.e ra.ic cx. I I II:Ot. I I fip'.B`COMC. F74 I I I o � � j f Z.b CME[vCLI OM � �� :a �o - �' 6'(dYCGA/Y[QV N �y . j�w I � ' f I�r cou� uti csc) ou � I � dY , I I I� � �20'. 6" [D4� !lC c .. � � • a�oeweu ou � � —' I' f� � � � '� e• ccuc curc tir � i i ir-.s• couc crc- � , � � i N I � I �-'_' � ; e I .�c 6'CO4c L� i �. e �, E.. cou� cro I � • L� [OULY. �Y LT11 I I • I �--- — '—• � _ . 1 � tl � � - � I o u► , I � �� =i = _ =L--�-h . I � "'�'tiK ..' J I i � ,� 1�� � — J I I' � :.� ' r—=^ , .. I I , .. � p'G. ' � K1EL ,�TIA ',�.�+�uRL 2.{ vi�W� .J L1ulIYL' � .i r- e! : I snct ; J', yKE ! A S E Y E N'T ,tio" couc Wo ��c.o�t I L_ . L � . Il•. e' C0/1L. �',TG� . 1 .. , ---1 "'""'� '"'"'"'� . . � i , R I — = i I I � � ' . ^ . ' = �'�� � . I I � � 5 �, � I ' i � I I � I �` tueW i--- - z, �o cu asis �� .. � ' � L"___'t ILb; � � � � i 1 ' t'i•2s6 M ►CE[�'�-- " . "� . I 1� "._' y�� � 1.6 K4EEULll01J ! �a = I; � � OCLICF [i00e � . . � I 1.0 L..COW. LC.ON-� � . � I � 2a� C�t_ astt. `"."•-/ -f ' 2C".g• [OYL cTG. I �i N i � ` ��\ IY'O<. � I '�S I � ; f �, �-3—�---- � `-+ ,. ;a � ` � CRAML EPACE I � � {j !' :O— �. .� CYEF -Lb�D V!LL OY I I,.�n i I � I ��t'.6' (AUC LUK6Lr011 � N -- � I I � � � � .' �4r'.fl`LDIK-CT4. � _ — ' . i� � ��� I I I . I � if� � '� � ' � IW �� � � j� ic e-, n- cnuc us i ' i° � � � Sc,'iT toUC 6�¢� � 7c 4� �c 4r 0�1 ; •� ,. �� � i2e'. �' Cd.ic iK� I 1 2G'.��• [.O�L �4.�y * :� . i' f L�..��r �E.�.E ',, I ,..s��� �� � � . , L_ ' .�_ - _� , i� —i � r----- . ----- .—, . �------i �i I � � f-----------�+— --� °' � �' �� I I L-- � '—IZe e• c�w�c` ir�.°Ll i � �� �� � t_seKr� ` n�z• UNDATION/BASEMENT PLAN . � . < < �..- . ,,.,.. R EN TA L AG R E E M E N T P�S. �85hOAvenue N.E.59 AAA•1 SELF SI'pRqGE Mini-R'uehouses 7807 Stace Hiway 65 Spring Iake Park, MN 55432 siz•�so_ieoz MA-i SELF STORAGE, Owner-LarW�ord (0-LI. hereCy fuAitY N�07 SNte H�.vry 65 Cusrorrrr-R�nta (GRI. �+ose p ! �nd whou Dhona number n � h*c 7638 m qs LL��7Y✓ �` �-'� cy "l JL LTMnnqlCharp�fathi�unitis� ✓�armonlhpaysAlaontheTirsldsyo}�ejh.G ndarmo�thin�tivsncaattheO�L�ddross ttabd �bpw. lf suck r�nt ia not paiJ by tM 1 OtA oi tM montA for wAicA it is Oue in �dvance tAe C-R w I be �ssecseA s charpe of i 1.00 p�r dsY up to � m�aiQUm o! i6� jor��ch month tAe nnt i� delinQUent O-L ►cknowleapn tha D m of a_...� �j,s.�"°�_ wbich pays th� n^1 unfh �.-�/ `• Thnsuaon this bau will t�rminate unleu it is renewed �ach mo��h by C�R p�yinp �bove mo��hly renul in W�snc� �� protid�d. Howw�r, O-L nservsa tha ripht �o ��cnaw monthiy charga witA 30 Cays wrinsn no�ica�oC-R. Ys�rly rnas ue wbjaGt to 1ntt�aN wilh writqn 30 6�y� notic� �t�er the eapir�tion ol leau. C-R is re9uiied m p�Y � claminy/damapa depout of _ T i� — to ba q1unQ�d upon wetlinp tM unit. prwided tha ueit it leti in a dun sM uM�maped condition. .� �� 7. GR undmunds �nd �pea lo oecvpv thr uora`e unie upon ehe following ierms and rnndnqns: ��� �. 711t tlotaRe unit vi11 bt used fnr no unlawful purqose, will 6e kept in pood .rnA�bon lu�ual wnr and deprecubon [�ap�ed� and nn r�Dim qve� w h¢hly in(IammaEle ma�erUl or goods xall be slored m ihe room. C�R lurthee wunnts the ston�c unit shall n. i be used r�cepi tur pod� tMt C•R kplly !us Ihe �i�h� to have m his puies:wn. ►. PL 'u not vnpred in the business of nonng Foods !o[ hioe no� cAe waeehoust busi�xss, bu� if just a iandlord rtnting � slongr umt. Consequently, no wperviswn m i�ontrol uJl Ce exernstd over C-R �nd C-R must uke r�haiever s�eps decmed necesvey tu vtrKuard whai N flored m the swrs�e unic I( (�R dhnes lo keep ehe Uni[ loNed, he mus•. M�`��de h�s own {ocks and keys an� i. fulq� rnpnnsiblc Ior rla lus posasswn of keys. OL carries no mcunntt whmh in �ny u�a> co.ers any lose Ihat C-R mas ha�e or chim 4�hJc rcnimg Ihe iionRe lull[ and Aenct, C-R musi arry ang irounna desireA. O-L shatl not be rtsyom��k o� luble, dnenfy o� mduectly, (or loss o� damape to Nut 6R tloree in tM uni[, no marter whnt Ihe ause, includmg fire, expluswn, Iheh, wind or watu AamaRe, bss o( hot whtn hni n ^ /rovided, etc. /_s.�/�lf 6R 6i1� to pay the renl vhtn due or raa�e Ihe premius yrompUy upen eip�n�wn o( 1hi. mn�N ap�temt�t [hen dL sh�ll Aave, 7nd n / UercDy Ronted, the following righ�s �and (adure to exerase s�mc on any one o� murr nc.anom �Aall not be a waner of ume). p) To fo�wilh Mpk �nd remuve any bck on the door belongmf io GR. enter ihe eimap< uni[ and mspect its ton�rnts. then pUce �hr bcle of 4L Ihereon undl auch con�ent+are di�pn.rd of b� PL m thc manne� haem�ttci p�ondcd QI B�fore d�sposinE o( tAc wmenit b� pu�lir, or priqte vlc, uport such mm; aod .nndmons as GL m�y ue fu. 6L w dl maJ �n f�R � vtitlen nolitt Ihat 61 Aas ulcen possea.bn of sunc �onten�s ond aill duposc of same Detwren the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 1:p(i P.M on tAe (int Monday of the week folbwinR Ihe tAp�n�bn of IS mnsecutnc days follur�np the datc on the wmten noUCC mailed (DI When O-L disposes o! tht mntents o( cAe s�ongv unii pursuaat tu the forcgoing notice, n shaN bt under no duty or obLga�ion to pro- duct Ihercfrom at pubGc or pnvalr yle an> amount ol meney mnrr tnan nrcosery le pay Io il �n}' ren!el due I W Oe hRurtO a• ��i �nr daie of Ihe sale) plm � rtasonabk wsl of arranFing (ur tlrc d�spusitiun o! such comen4s not to e..ceed S?5.00. If m fact more is rqlurd thndrum OL r'ill fwN(y C-R of any suth eattss and Ihrrcafitr hold same In trus� fo: GR for 90 days a� no im<rest, ftom �he dat< of �ht nolicc, durinp vhieh Iime C-R shall qll for il and pive dL a rettip� �hercfor. Failum to all for it within sucfi 90 day pmod o� refuvl �o ro«ipt for it sA�ll Itrminale the Irusl ind PL shall bc entnled In kap cuch proceeds. (i) !f �ny ot the co�teno of the seora�e unit to be disposed of consist of papers, picturn, documenn, er like personal propetty ehu mytht not be considered lo have any dollar .aluc, PL may dispou o( same in such manner as It ues tn md��dmg desuoymg �ame or Rrving ime aw�y. t. io indemnify and hold harm3ess 6L (rom �ny ynd all capense, demands, tlaims, acuons or auses of stuon Mvng directl> or mdvecdy from C-R stonge of joods in th< s�onge unic 7. All notices mlled (or haein shall be gncn a� thr abovt addresx5 shoY'a I� shatl De lhe duty of C-R lolutnish QL �n writinR any thanpe o( addressoc plwne numbn by csrti(ied mait, rc�um reaip� requaeed. �. No provision he�rof m» hr �.e:.ed or ch�nged o�het than by r•riuen agmement, and GR unders�ands [}u� onl> an of(�ur of UL ma)- au�hwii< any waiver, modifiqtion or evensan of any of !he terms heteof. S. Thit mmlacl will be bindinj upon, md inurt to, lhc benefil of the partles Aerc�o, their heirs, wazswn, pe�sonal repres�nut�ves �nd ��a(1�f. . 6. 1 fully uodersund, as siaitd in pangraph 7-6, ah y�s nre w� insured 6y AM- ACCElTEO AND AGREFD TO: `� J qAA-1 + If Storage w' o.�,R- aio.a (oL) �� t �� dy. i Crsto rRmta tC-Rqr— , I Sdf Starage. Aee � , __. � . - -. _ - � 30 - 71th Avenue Pl.E. � ''' ^ "' P.S. #85-01 �� AAA•1 SELF STORAGE AAA-1 SELi STORAGE AAA-1 SELF STORAGE AAA-t SELF STORAGE 2300 Xenium Lsne 8124 State Highway 52 7807 HighwaY 65 t15 Esst Marie Avanue PlymouM, MN 55441 Brookiyn Park, MN 55445 Sprinp Leke Park, MN 55432 West St. P�ul, MN 55118 (6121 553-1545 (612) 425-2610 (612! 78a180Z (6121 4553720 Rental Ag eement �� u�t r � � X/0 S��- � �_ �---- RULES AND REGULATIONS � S.0 . �� -- / ' � RENT: �� Y � per month includes tax, if any. 2. J�Ve do. not bilj. _� � � Mail check or money order to above address. �(� � � �� Sp 4. Write unit number on check or money order. /"� a� S. Due in advance on the first of the month. � 6. Penalty and possible lock-out if not received by the lOth. � �.� 7. A$6.00 charge will be made foc any check returned by the bank. ---�— 8. Contents of unit sold at auction after 60 days for non-payment of rent. TERMINATION REQUfREMENTS: 1. Rental agreement terminates on date specified unless renewed by payment of rent. 2. Deposit will be refunded only if C/R gives !0 days' notite before vacating and i --- _ unit is left in a clean condition. `__ _____�__ _ _�� _. _ - - LOCKS: � - � 1. You provide your ow� padlock and keep the keys. We stron 1 u� ou to use a good padlock - one as good or better than the Iocks so in ttus o�ce. 2. There will be a$3.0� per month charge when necessary for AAA-1 Self Storage to provide a lock for unlocked units. 3. Place one lock in bottom hole of latch onty. INSURANCE: l.�ou are responsible for insuring the contents of your storage unit. AAA-1 $elf Storage does not insure the contents and assumes no liability with regard to items stored in its uniu. CHANGE OF ADDRE55: • It is your responsibility to keep this office advised of your current address. The Post Oifice provides forms for this purpose. FOR YOUR PROTECT[OI3: 1. No combustibles or flammables allowed in storage units. No screws or nails in the wails. 2• No hanging personal property frorn roof joists or walls. 3. Be sure to raise valuable items off the floor at least 3". ADDIT[ONAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Use free standing shelves only. 2. Please turn out the lights when you leave your unit. 3. Refuse must be placed in dumpster. � � � �- Cus� e �t� I-l� - s r . .. ,. . � .� c�rv ov FA�o�EV, � St1B�ECT �w�+ ur,�vcnsnr w�+�. Ns. LOT SPIIT sw�n�cr, w�. osue ���,s»-a�so RfCpRDEO: �3D MJ11�0�1ING COM11SSI0(t: APPROYED _ 0250.PVROYED C1TT COUMCIL: ►ARK FEE REQUIRfD: STIPUUTIONS: �- » � LS / ;�`^-�'� o�TE• � � �S M7E NO APPROYED OISAPPROYED Qi1TE NO_ f..�.;, PAID 61 WIME S. ;\S�c�� FFE*�O o RECEIPT NO ('T�3�' PROPERTY OWtiER(S �`�l,o,.,� be�� *G��r« l�� ( �� TELEPHONE NO S%I'%g7S �e� �P i - Y `°"'"'�r' 1 LQ.�I'�S ' ViJ�a� c�1 � 7ELEPNONE NO S Oa S� ADDRES5IE5) Q30 q.�cC�Cr�c.�nv� '�v� 1��. ���c,I�e.�. SS�3� 53a��1 �sse(� ��e, � � � i�- PROPERTY LOUTION ON STREET 930 �,,L.,?`^'' C L�. IEGAI DESCRIPTION PROPERTr j1-u X/ o d � Qc�u�— GD0 "'�� (����� --� TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY �-��w�C 19,`5`u� s.F, ��� �(�J) pRESENT IONING �� REASON FOR L0T SPLIT I� cz�,o.J 0.�������5 R�.c�r�n� ('a�."��ek ��� `_�a: �; � 0 uee� u5�� � o�r -g�-cac a�a• � � The undersigned'he�by declares that all�he tacts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. , ah: a- �'1 ��S MOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed 1ot split with any existing struc- tures sho►m should accompany th{s application. ' .(See reverst ztde for additional instructions) �/ q/�S'�'+'�'��-�� -�i.�� c� l''`� '� 0 � �z�� C(NOF FRIDLEY 62 C�Y1C CENTER • 649} UNNERSiTY AVE N E_ FAIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PNONE 16121 571-3450 February 11, 1985 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The City of Fridley Planning Commission will be holding an informal hearing on a request for a lot split, L.S. #85-03, by Robert 5. Gilstad, to split off the Easterly 120 feet, except the Northerly 135 feet of part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25, to be used for parki�g at the apartments on Lynde Drive. Anyone who wishes to be heard on this request can attend the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, February 27, 1985 in the Council Chamber of City Hall at 6431 University Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. *This item was tabled at the February 27, 1985 Planning Commission Meeti�g. It will be heard on the March 20, 1985 Planning Commission Meeting. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION 6� Mailing List for L.S. #$5-03 Lynde Drive Apartments Joseph J. Branco 5720 Polk Street Fridley, MN 55432 James L. Jorgenson 5730 Polk Street Fridley, MN 55432 Louis J. Adams 5740 Polk Street Fridley, MN 55432 Lewis & Vivian Hedland 5230 Russel Avenue North Brooklyn Genter, MN 55430 Robert S. Gilstad 930 Hackmann Avenue N.E. fridley, hN 55432 V r J� ^�, V , C�L ��J ' ��-�- ��-�-- � a�-....� ��� � 65 ��^'� #85-03 Hackmann I :� � �� 60 jITLE `NSURANCE COMPANY OF mINNESOTA ANOKATITLE DIVISION L.S. #85-03 ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 930 HdCkfndnn REGISTEKED PRONEKTY ABSTRACT Thi�abstracicn�ersCertific�teufTitleNo., 14379 dated MaYCh 16� 1960 �originally ���„����� January 4th � 1929__) regs�ered in Vul. 63 Pa� 14 �n the office o( the Regstrar uf Tides uf Anuka Cuunty, Minnesota. . 7 hc TfTLE ISJSURANCE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, Anoka Ti�le Division, dces hereby certify: 7�Lai Ihc pruper�y dexrilxd in �he Certificate of Title appean therein as folluws: The Easterly 120 feet, except the Northerly 135 feet of: Tl-,at part of Lot 1, Auditor's 5ubdivision Number 25 which is described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point on the North line of eaid Auditor's Subdivision Number 25, distant 221.7 feet East of the Northo.�est corner thereof, which point is also on the centerline of Centrzl Avenue, thence East on said North line a distance of 270.8 feet; thence South a distance of 308.2 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 160 feet A�orth of the most Southerly line of said Lot 1, which point is 937.94 feet distant East from the centerline of Central Avenue; thence West along a line parallel with and 160 feet North of the most Southerly line of said Lot 1, a37.44 feet to the centerline o£ Central Avenue, thence Northeasterly along said centerline to the point of beginning, and except the North 30 feet thereof, said 120 feet to be measured along the North line of said Lot 1. That accorJing tu said Certificate, the pruperty is registered in the folluwing names: Lewis A. Hedlund and Vivian L. Hedlund, his wife in fee simple as joint tenants 32 & 30 who, according to said Certificate, dTe o[ the age S o( years, fo ----- Thal rrcilal. up��ear tlierein as tolluws: NONE married and dY0 undet no disabilify. ( ,r� �• . • �,� � ' l y� ,� 7 I • NI �' �,• w�.rs~..� � ' � � ~ t � '�W � � !'l�cry�a r, � .�. f � . I � I • �� i e � ._ .���'+ ' _._.. .. r_.._ ...�SG. r SG9S / , �+ �+ , d . .., . � . �. �� �.� �,.4� �• , �� � i��- ��`-�- - :'.; ' tlao r+� � s�e• � AzG..,�:'�.I i 79S S �O 1 � -- �„ _ • "9 0 .' !... . . ,. ,� � �� r .. �� �� .... -��,� i ' ,�.........---• �I •� �y �-�- -------� � � w iw) d�� I .�� 1�� j� F�n71� /aomew _ k� ��aanay •• 'i.�p, , �.,�, A� ��, '. � • �M-; __._..._` `�� , �; -Yl� Ae, (111 •I! 1�'►� �li1 „r` � �IE"� !e �ol�' 1 Os I010 � s � 4Lel s� �jS�l � tsil, / GI ir �S. �M85- 'i (1^ u o °: � � �� r�N ' ,;� rJ'1` � �j41 "IO1( r t - -+ i. — i -.,.. .. �80 �(to oo0lale ! � I \ N I I R �� � r � � 14 1e�;�;a:.A. 1�T! (♦ � ,. ,..�.YNDE .��rD, ,. t !} 1 � 1�S 1 J ��Q � � � ... ru a � / M � u �� ` R � E 3370 I � s ts ca �� �...,.,. . 6 �w• � ' ' S3�S � � � : ..� `____f — � • � ., • , � ; f�J•' 7 a t � � � �. _s�-- . ; .._._..-----------...----------._.__. ,—_.______ . � , ,. __. -..,. .. _ � i' � NO � �,�a� 8 3 :.: _._ _. _.. - ---__ : - : � ������ . . . �� � � � �� � �. � � , � , :, . ._______ __ __ ______ ___ _ __ _ __ _ .. ..�` �,.s� g � � � ._:. :: ; � � , . - .� _._._--�-----�---.. _.._.. ....___ .,------�-�. � -=r:-� -_.__..._ ---,;,--•• -� iZS� ix�i • - � ' _ � -''�. , � �.,.. � --- . , . _..� . . . -----• _ : . .. .._.__ .. ----�-..... ° . ` --.._._ . ' °""" .�.� s l � � Si QW: '. • . -��_�, - �. �s.r .. ' '• "'� �.......� �. ""�-�" " � " - �► ��..-...:• " - .. X? IJ)T '7�.,. � � • Y(i'�f l'���� � � � ._ ' � � � �\ �;` � . ' ��, * ' � . � : � 'L, `__�...�_ Iyy �.Y . . � ; ..'., --�_ ,-'c .Q, �_. �NT � � i ,�_. __ � ---- - -�-__ � � � '--�x ''�..° . �`�------_..___,. ;,� ---:-'''' jj...�,�- � � . '- � - r . y � � �� :� � + 1 s+i �j,�' i � � i _�`t�_�Tt. � ...w � -- �12LO `�''� � � � �KE A'Pr NE�STFaU� tb ToTA� 72 S1AU5 'SUtf� N *L'���J /2tr` t5 rL' RrJ"wN w/ R- I tC NaT.ilt i BuF%Le��:��F[.NrF �s G.tE 8 � \ � � � �� ❑� / \ �SCfi£EN Dur��fEF — � — �____ _� = I� -�� � � � i LYND� DR�vE UE L.S. �85-03 93D Hackmann � ❑ t ��pta � -fti FSuFFER --�FENCE r+�v�NE . xAT� ------------ .LD`�E PCCESS �� �SUtEEN � � tJ � � J � . •.. � �. . . ••.��h •'D��7 ' 1 L: '1� M H� ���' 1!! li •. • 71• 1 � Y S� ]'� •• • • � • • 1 ��•• .• 7�• � � D 1' il �1. M �• �1� 1 l: M � • ��' ��?. �'.�• 1 ]� • 105.01. 7t�e following definitions shall apgly in the interpretation and application of this Chapter and the follaaing words and tezms, vherever the� occur in this Q�aFter, are defiried as follows: 1. Houlevard. A minimam of twenty (20) feet extending frcm the curb line back into the irx7ustrial or oor,anercial property, 2. Qub Line. A o�ncrete oc a_,�phalt barrier Which physically aeparat� the street frcr the boulevaro. 7t,is barrier (curb) separates the water on the street fran t2�e soil of the boulevatd. 3. Front Yard Area. Rhe first tbirty-five (35] feet extending from the curb line back into c�iBentiai property. 4. Noxious Weeds. 4he annurl, biennial and per�nial plants which are deened by the S�te Qaruussioner of Agricuiture to be injurious to public health, Fublic roans, crops, livestock and other property, 5. Owner. Any a��ner. lessee or occupant, or arry agent, servant, repr�ntative or e:gloyeE of any such a.�ner, lessee or occuFxnt ha%ir:g control of the pcoperty, 6. Useless Vegetation, All troublesme and rank vegetation including grasses, brush and veei�s not oef ined as noxious weecis. 105.02. AIRP(JSE 7he CYty oouncil has deai,ed ttsat the wergzaath of noxious weeds arxi useless vegetztion creates a detrurent to ti�e public hewth, �:fort ancl oonvenience of the residents of the City of Fridley and creates a gertieral aesthetic depreciation of the City, and hereby declares such wergrowth to be a nuisanoe. DEFINTTICNS .� ..�:� 69 105.03. PI�3ffiTTIC�7 It shall be imlaoful for any aarer having control of ar�� occupied or inoccupied lot or land or ariy part thereof in the City of Fridley to peurst or a�air.tain on any lot or land ar�� growth of noxious weecis or useless vegetatioti abwe i�ight Iimits identified below in Sections 105,04 and 105.05, or any accwnulation of dead noxious weeds or useless vegetation. It shall also be iailavful for any such person or persons to cause, suffer or allow rocks, dirt or any other aebris to be deFosited on the boulevard or front yard area. 105.04. II��OSiRIAT�/�4�ER(SAL, VAQ�Nf OR DF,S�F3qF� pRpPF'.RTIFS 1, it shall be the dity of any a�r�er of an industrial or oocmezci�l property to maintain the appropriate boulevard area by cutting, mowing, renwing oz clearing noxious weeds or useless vegetation. Rhe boulevard area shall slso be kept clear and clean of any other tiebris such as zocks, dirt piles, danped ooncrete, asphalt, or any other forei� material deposited on the property site. 2. �ree (3) cutting or mowing operations must be performed within the boulevard area, as fallows: A. RY�e first cutting and renwal of noxious Weec3s and useless vegetation shall be wmgleted betve�n J�e 25 and July 1D. B. �e ceoond cutting and renwal of noxious Weens and useless vegetation shall be aomgleted prior to �ist 10, or thiriy (30) days frcn the first cutting operation, in or8er to teduce pollen ooimts in the hay fevez period. C. 4he third and final cutting and renoval of noxious weeds and useless ver�tation shall be �npleted betWeen Septanber 1 and Septer.ber 15, in or8er to reduce the fire hazerd. 3. 4he noxious weeds oc useless vegetation shall be cut so as not to allow growth to exceed a greater heic,ht than ten {10) inches on the average during these time periods. 4. Par�eis of land ext�ding beyond the defiryed boulevaro area may oz ma}• not reauire cutting and zeawal. operations. Enforcement of the �a��er pzavisions against these areas with noxious weeds and useless veoetation Will be left to ti�e discretion of the City Weed Inspector. In determining whether the noxious weeds or useless vegetatiom m�stitute a nuisance, the City Weed inspector shall oonsider, but is not linSted to, me (1) or more of the following: A. Rhe noxious weeis or useless vegetaticn are located withir. 100 feet of an occupied dwelling, office, commercial or industrial buil ding: B. They are noxious Weeds as determined by the State tknmissioner of Aoriculture; C. They are a detriment to the public health, comfort and co7rvenience of the residents of the CYty; D. They create a general aesthetic depreciation of tbe reic�borhood. r�.�• r. � u. �n r •• i � •« . v. • - � a �•a�� • •.� • •� �a. fl�, � � -�. �.� ••..• •� ��. �� .- .. � .•�. 1. It shall be the duty of arty arner o� a r�;idential property to mairnain the appropriate front yard area by cutting or mowing� and ra,�aving the excess dead noxious Weecis oz useless vegetation. 2. Rhe noxious weeds or useless veoetation shall not be permitted to grow to a greater height than ten (30) irxhes on the average. 3. fhforoanent of t2ie Q�aptec prwisions against ti�e tenaining side and reaz yard areas Will be l�t to the discretion of the City Weed Inspector. In determining vhether the noxious weeds or useless vegetation oonstitute a nuisance, the Weeo Inspector shall oonsidetr but is not liuriteci to, me (1) or more oi the folloWing: A. They are noxious Keeds as determined by the State Qymnissiorer of Agriculture= B. �hei� are a oetriment to the public health, oomfort, and oorrvenience of the r�ider�ts of the Cityt C. They create a general aesthetic depreciation of tbe rieigtil�ortpod. 105.06. GFN�AL NC7iPI� Zhe ger,eral notices f or control and eradication of noxious weeds and useless ve9etation shall oonsist of this Chaptez published in the official Fcidley t3a�spayer pcior to Ju�e 15 � each yeat. 105.07. NOmI� � V�OI.AT�1 When the amer permits a nuisance to exist in violation of this Q�apter, the Qty weea InsFector shall serve a notice on the owner of such lot or parcel of land oroering such person to have such noxious weens oz useless vegetation cut and r anaved or ot2�enrise eradicated or za;�wed within ten (1�) da}•s after ti�e servioe of such rwtioe. Such notice shall also state that in the event of nonca;�gliance, «.ova]. aill be mne by the tity of Fridley at the awner's e�ense. k�en no a�ner can be famd, notice shall be sent by reoistered n,ail to the person Who is listed on the remccL of the Coimty Auditor or County Treasurer as the ownec, Service will be mnglete with the mailing. 105.08. ASSFSSFf3iT If such owner fails, reglct.ts or refuses to c�.ply with the notice o� violation within the specified time period or no avner can be found, the City shall cause such noxious weeds and useless vegetation on such lot ot Iand to be cut and r arwed. 4'he actual cost of such cutting and rer.oval. plus up to twenty-f ive (25) peroent for inspection and other additional costs in connection theravith, shall be oertified b� the City to Anoka Cbunty and shall be added to and become and form part of the taxes next to be assessed and levien upon such lot or 1� ano shall beaz interest at 71 • �, �..a •.. • -� � r .- �. > �•�. a x•� • • � • •• • • • ASSFSShh�NT the sa:.E rate as t�s and shall be collected and enforced by the sa^e officer ano in the s�e aanner as taxes. 105.09. P�IALTgS 11ny violation of ti�is Q�apter is a misdeneanor and is subject to all penalties provided f or such viol�tions ander the provisions of (hapter 9�1 of this (k�3e. Each day that the violation exists or oontinues to e�cist sha11 be dee�ed a se�,rate offesise. :�.: �� i�4SSID APID ADOPi'ID BY 7IiE QTY Q�JDI((SI.. QF giE QTSt OF FRI�,EY' 7�IS DAT OF � 1985 WII.LIAMI J. l+�E - F�,YOR F37'E5I': STI]Ni.'Y C. II�AfAtv - QTY Q.F�tA 72 ios. xEms (Ref. 397) 105.01. PFa�iIDI7'ION It shell be unlavful for any owner� lessee or occupnnt, ot any agent, ser��a�t, rep:esentative or erployee of an}� such orr,ier, lessee ac oocupant having oontrol of arty occupied or �occupied lot or land or art}' part thereaf in the City of Fridle� to pecnit or rtaintain on any lot oz land any grarth of xeeds, g�ass, brush or tank ve9etation to a gzeaLer height than ten (10) inches on the average, or any accunulation of dead Weeds, grass ot brush. It shall also be ►mlawful for any such person or persons to cause, suffer or nllw poison ivy, rag.reed or other poisonous plants, oc plants detriaental to health to gra: on arry such lot or land fn such manner that any part of such ivy, rag�:eed, oz othez poisorous oi DazrSul veed shall extend upon, overha�g or border any public place or allov to seed, pollen ot to allw any other poisonous particles or emanations therefrom to be carried through t2ie air into any public place. (Ref. 397) 105.02. I7IT1Y It shall be the duty of arp� owner, lessee or Iand to cut and ter�ove or cause to be cut Weeds, grass, brush or other rank poisonous often as may be recessary to cmply vith the 105.01; prwided that cutting and rer.oving vegeta tion at least once in every three (3) and Septenber 15 shall be dee�ned to be a Q�aptet. 105.03. Wi�rION BY CITY occupant af any lot or and re^,oved all such �r harmful vegetation as piovisions of Section such veeds, grass and veeks, betveen Mlay 15 compliance vith this If the pzwisions of the foregoin9 sections are not complied vith, the City weed Inspectoc or Police Department shall serve a Wtitten notice upon the o�mer, lessee or occupant or any pecson having the care oc control of any such lot or land to conply with the prwisions of tr,is Q�apter. If the person upon vhom the notice is served fails, reglects oz refuses to cut a�d renove or to cause to be cut after the date of such notice, or no person can be f ound in the City of iYidley vho either is or clai:.s to be the wnez of such lot or land. oi vho either cepcesents or clairos to cepresent such a.^ier, the City Wee�d Inspector shall cause such veeds, grass, bzush and othet vegetation on such Iot or land to be cut and re-..oved and the actual aost aF such cutting and re-�wa1, plus up to 25 percent for inspeetion and other additional costs in oonnection thereWith, shall be certified by the City to Rroka Co�ty and shall thereupon bea�e and be a lien upon the pzopezty on which such Weeds, grass� brush and other vegetation r+ere located and shall be added to and beoa-,e and form �rt of the taxes next to be assessed and levied upon such lot or land and shall beaz interest at the sa;,e rate as taxes and st�,all be coliected and eriforced bp the sa..-�e officer ar�d in the sa�e manr�er as taxes. io5.o�3 ..,� c w �� INI��VMf7�1 SY CITY 105-1 105.04. F'F?�ii�LTffi 11ny violation of this Qiaptez is a misde��eanor nnd is subject to all penalties pzovided for such violations under the pzovisions of QSaptec 901 of this C.ode. Each day that the violation existc oi oontinues to exist shall be dea�ed a seg3cate offense. 74 ios.oa. �� � �� 1D5-2 � � 75 MEMO T0: Planning Commission City Council MEMD FROM; Philip Domrner, Planning Assistant r=`� MEhp DATE: April 18, 1985 MEMQ NQ: 85-28 RE: Consideration of Approval of Sign Plan for 7570 Highway p65 N.E. In accordance with Chapter 214 of the Fridley City Code, a comprehensive sign plan has been submitted for the property located at 7570 Hiqhway #65 N. E. Your consideration for approval is requested. The Administrative Staff has reviewed the plan and has provided the followinq information: 1. Signage permitted under this sign plan meets all City specifications. 2. The site has several automobile repair garages operatinq without a Special Use Permit. A Special Use Permit is to be applied for prior to June I, 1985. Roger Larson, the owner of the site, has been in to discuss this. Landscaping and the sanitary sewer are to be issues at that time. 3. Temporary sign permits have been issued for the site. PSD/de 77 ..i.. n.:.. .s"__.._. _.. 1. L2CC aELcL� _.. oIIE _°YOt.� w=1�_:�, _..1 :��1"2 O:.c ..�L: X:.=.,.. i(11.1 DB iC��_ �-� _�c�s r,l�n ty E°_ _ ;'; _�_: _.. ��: -... 2. ..:�:- "--- .c c- r-=.:� ...:_�_�_:---. .,_... _..;,.__.,_ �__ �- .. )• ucC: " 6_�a �° 'y1GC6= O'. LA� �.-_�;. :.�, r?. �..:. 4y,t._C?.Y..[�e� 1JV���I... GL r.�CI.�. �.. Y.�.. G�I..�.�.�Ie� Q�Gi������ � � � (�_�r ..�.� �..�.�.._ „���Y� v.... ....._�...�� C� t�L��� �..� �.iv_• � �lul.� r..ull �.��. E'i.Y�.... �1��u��a�. �.E ��� f�)li�. �!� W�E ��.. ..r� ���.�..�� �j.��� �Cl:l.::2__E�� er.ce�� rL�I .,::° IE:.�.'.�:. O: �E0'_' ta__..�r.� r..�� plF�e ..z�: o:. tr.e r.o_��.c�:t pe�tior o` _ro-.: __=-�^d_:.�; a� `-r.==cate_ -- --"- _, -_r<� . 'y�cyl� r� ' � r � - �� L:.<" 'E�yec..=':< .___t.e�e.. .t.c�_ ..`_�: � .-.._. .� _ .,._ �-i -et= Y.=_ �.._ ...,,, ..._C L:�.. �_l. ��� If::;_ _. lE�.V..• t.. .�i�� b.�._ �C.,..ve C���.�' c� i.�L.. r.. .,..iQt �• at:.-�....v� 1.� ��.�_ 1..11-� � ...��.. ��r�l. �� . -�... :: c� �LE" "�__ 7:.�j �o.�') SZ. ..:...�. .,_,_ � ' � LE . � 1E�_ ...c.. LLTE: '..'/ �Ei" �" "c�V.�:� c..._ ..� ....�_� �.a�.. �,..... �'/ -cc�� i:. ..__"r-. ...r_ ....,._�. _ _� _....._��, C�� T.C: I'.O�e t�.c:. '�CT�}' �LC� Sy::c.=E reEt. , _:,i.._ �.:,._Cr:, ,.._ �_,., ; L"<� �E _c��L..__ '� "-_'._'._..� .._..�....Z. !. �J:_S:=L_, eE::.S.Lt:, c_E '_'E:.�OLE=Gle r0: L.".E 7E'..^.:8._E C_ �_�'.': __ .,..._ .._.. L::E;j 1'cC:i,2 �'�2["._EEz. . .Ei: �a:.a:_-. ...._� ayy�� �� __.., o' "'_`_t� -�_ _-� F '___' iG.:�e'r: :;._-.A::;, .._�„ e_e::L .. � == �.^.�_�c_:__ i:=�.. Ei�:. 2,��.. cr... .:_-� .,._:__. Zl.nll � � .,:&�_ �E :,cC'_IE7 �D ...---_"� h_�•. 6L::.G_� c�-- ia._ ..._�.,. 1G��.0 SZ:.�1P 1Ei.�C= C_ 1J.��: ..c� CE CCE_` jC� �.. .._i�:.i. =` �oacle 1-TE _.. _.__. raxi..;L� ie��<_ :�=`_<: . �:'___ :e ,..:e�-, (��j �-c�-:e�. ?` i-'r�e lir.e i� u�:_ _.._ S12::_'....'. _c...__ «£ �" " '..a�_ .-� � c7:C_�; �..Be�'�E _..., ._c �- ` � .-�i 76 .._,,. n:::.., �:.�� , _- r�. - ^._..._. -'.- �'.-�_ _.__.._ _ ' ' _ '" " ..__ _ . .... ..: . = �. �. . ' _. .:.......� _...___ _..�. _ _ _.._. _ �, � _. __ -_ —�.._..�:. _.._ o-�_ •. � y_Cr__C.= � � ..__. to Cz:-..�., -•._.. ::._ ___"_:.�; ..:��� :;�__:y �..�� �cc.�_... .. ..i�r. er the __ ._._.. a .rc' �a�,:.'_ce 1�� �'�t. ... _:.� ,.�.._..�__ _..�_. :e�.._:. �_.� �-i, �_. ,_ .ir_ai:�� :',,..-- --'� .�� -�,_ ,,.. ..._ .e:.��r.i. _.... c_-��i:.�a F'_�� e'�t:.eT Le DH.=:-:ec 'r.py=ecec••� •. �.yl;re\c� l�s2c c: �=L-1C_.. �� LO_°=s�..C:�,,.... �� .,' _"��`y=0�'E�� . .._�. ?rfl�'_'.�� t,�;r� .,�l�e ..,_.. .�:.,YY-"v1E_ (.c�Se� O-:. ii:.::__C•.._ � .... _. - - . . _ . __ .. ;.G�_"Ch�,D:.c� dZE LO :.E :E:-.Y�.'.�.. 2C t.-.e lE.:._ic:.. LL::._� _.��F:.L�S ci.y:v\'l...�� 0= o�e tC CE iE.:cE',_'.E:. P.:" 'Eo_.-._��"t= :U' :...�, ifi'_�-=':. dyi:'_"O•.c� F_�:.=: ��e',�.. .^� - � cr _TeCE=i;:. �j :e:.�.',. ..:�L �.`cA::.�C �..c. _ ' . ' ' ' �'� ' " "' _ ' _ _ ........ �...._. _� cj.t.C.�� �_. ..� .. ___ .`'.l� .. G.... =C�..._.._rl.C' .._ ..u. iu.._�..._. ._. /r• � F.j,i,I':....... 21..C'i �_�.._.' �_._.. �� � ..Fj� G- :'t;;�ii,.. :j ��:.C.I.7.. e � �, -�` W l.l � �t( � � �I �� �1 ��� I � 2 _J � ,' Zi � T Li « ---� i i � I I - i t � '---- 1 � ! 1 _ ��. � - , , - . � � . � __.___.; -� ._--f 79 r � ! n ; �I =9 �: �� � � 3I �ii �I �, o �I � �`T '., K � 2 ` ` �'� � � " � i '� I �I f - I � :. ` 1 �_ i � _ . + � �I r f t _'� 1 r , j , ; � ' ` �J �'� i----� , I — �- � I n II i i � � � _ ; i 4`� - _ - i f � � � { —� 4 .� � E1 zta.��.3 3, ffzi�ting aigns vithin the ahopping center or multlple use building vhich do not ceet tAe requirementes of this chapter andfor aign plan, ahall be deflned as a ltgal non-conforming sign, and ahall be aubject to the restrictiona aet forth ia 21t.17.2.(8) nertnstion a��i.oa , !!. Illegal non-conforming aign: Any aign in any district which vas constructed in violation of any requirementa of tbis chapter. and is not a legal non-conforming eign. 3/5/23/t/ ,2 U 214.17.2.iS) H. A eign ahall immediately loae its •legal aoa-conforming" deaignation and De ter�ed an 112ega1 non-conforming eign if: 1. The aign Sa altered in any vay vhich makes the eign leaa ia compliance vith the requirementa of tbis cAapter than St vaa Defore the alterations, ezcept ior routine maintenance. 2. She eupporting atructure of the afgn i� replaced or remodeled. �. ?he face of the aign is replaced or r�odeled. �. The aign becomes dilapidated or damaged and the coat of bringing it into compliance is more than 50 per cent of the value of aaid eign, at which time all ot the aign and its structure must be removed. 5. Notwithatanding auDparagraph (1) aDove, upon the change of the name of [he Dusiness being diaplayed on this eign. �"21L.1T.� �. Illegal non-conforming aigna are prohibited vitbin tde City of Fridleq. Should an Sllegal non-conforming nign De found to ezist, the arner of aaid sign will have 30 days Lo remedy the eituation in one of the follwing manners. }` Remove the ezisting illegal non-conforming aign. If a neu aign ia desired, it aust meet all applicable requirementa of tdia cAayter. $. Obtain a aign permit for the exinting Sllegal non-conforming aign, and if applicable apply for • variance to eliminate the illegal non-conforming atatus. 2t4.21.3 3. eli varSences granted prior to November 21, 197�, unlens apecified bq Council, remain in effect until: R The aign is altered in any vay r+hich make� Lhe aign less in compliance vith tLe reQuirementa of this chapter than it xas before the alterations, except for routine maintenance. �. The aupporting atructure of the aign ia replaced or remodeled. a,. ihe face of tLe sign ia replaced or remodeled. �. ?he aign becomea dilapidated or damaged and tLe coat of DrSnging it into compliance is more Lhan 50 per cent of t6e value ot said aign, at rhich time all of the eign and its atructure be removed, � Notwithstanding subparagraph (1� above, upon the change of the name of the business being dl�played on t61a ai�. At auch time, tbe wner of aeid aign will have three (3) months to obtain a algn permit and cons$net a eign rhich meets all requirementa of this chapter or, oDtaia a variance for anp aex or exiating sign v61ch doea not meet all requirementa of this ebapter. PRESENT SIGN CODE 21�. SICNS (Aef. 3i8. 33�� 34L. 382. i38. 666, 672, T99) amendaentaeto the Chapter enactedd0y thefCMty Cc nc119D��or toisaidddate)11 21�.01. tQRPOSE =pe purpoee of this Chapter is to proteet and promote the puDlle Lsa1tA, �af�t� and 6ener�l velfare of the City of Fridley Lhrough the the•erectlon, ot � oomprehensive and impartiel aet of regulation� governing Eiaylay and u�e of aign� aerving a� a•isual �dia to peraone �P�avidel�n or prir�te yroperties. The�e regulation� are intenCed to D - otDortunity for effeciive cosaunic�tion, •llox a rea�on�Dle freedoo of cholce vid proeote a coneern for the vlsual a¢er.itie3 on those people • ��eugingBthatStheypuDlicrAealth,osafetyiand general�velfa'e ofntAeiCltyile pre�erved. Zyb,p2, DLFI1►1SIOt5 define01�sifol3ore�andeshallsaDDly rin itstinte pretationt� d pplication:re �, �bsndoned Sisa. � sign vt�icA no longer correctly +d�ertiae� a Dona fide bu�Snees, le » or, ovner, activlty, u�e or proCuct �vallaDle or. the preslsee r�ere the sign is d1�D1�Yed for � ooniinuo�e period of eore th�n three (3)montna. 2. �ddrea� Siga. A sign consia�ing of nuaDers or nurbers an� a atreet nase, Sdent3fying the sddress of a Duildina. j. �4rcrtl�ing Sign. A sign �hich ia ux d to sCverLlee yrodocta, 600Cs, uees or servicee. lI, �lteratioa. Any ma�or change, excluding routlae nainterance, of sn existing aign. 5, iree Identificstion Sian. 1uDdivisionc��ieultipleeres de tial coay2eze oBna�Du i easaorsindu tri�l arsa. 6, $annera and Pennants. � te�porary aign oon�tr�cted of cloth, canvas�, p�Der, ylaatic f1le o� light faDrie. 33 Purpoae Defiaitione Zia-oi 214-C2.17 �. Henen si6n. A aign vD1eA is �ttacLed to a EeneL. S. 8111board. A sign advertising a buaine�a, product, aervlce, use or entertalnment vhlch !s oonducted, sold or offered aome�here other than on Lhe prealses rEere the �ign ia located. 4, CpaageaDle Sign, �uta�atic. !n electronically controlled aign, Sncluding a time, temperaturc or date sign, or a mensage center or a readerboard, vhere QSfferent me�sage changes are �hoxn on the aaae panel. 10. Changeable Sign, lSanual. A algn on �hlch the mes�age in chenged aanuallr. 11, Con�tructlon Si;n. A tes porary aign erected •t a cors�truction site identifying Lhc proJect. It may Include the name of the architect, en5lneer, contractor, financier or other information aDout the pro�ect. �p. DSatrlct. l zoning district a� defined 1n Chapter 205, Zoning, of the tity Code. 13. Fl���ing SSga. An illun:nated algn vhlch Aa� intersittent f1a�Aing lights, revolvSng beacons, zip fla�her� or exhlbits a aoticeaDle cAange Sn color or light lnten�ity. �L. Yree SCsnding Siga. A�ign vAich is aecurely ettached to the sround and not att�ched to any part of a Duilding or atructuro. 15. Goverwental Sign. A ai5n wl�ich ia erected Dy • governmentsl unit for t�e purpose of directing j� or gulding traffic or providing public informatlon. �—� /J/�..�,z,L 7t,.r� - C=c�,.��.->-��,�,.7� t6._ Iliuraiaated Sisn. � � � sign vhich Se i11ua1nated Dy an artificial light source. ��, Iatonation Sisn. 1 siga giving intormation or direction� to ecployeen, •i�itora or delivery �ehlcles and containing no advertising. An information aign ea� dieplay the mae, address or SCentitj�ing aymbol oi the business. ua-oz JY i8. In�tituiioaal Sl.an. A ai6n vhich idenLifie� •➢Ufllic or privatt institutlon including churches, achooln, ho�Ditale and sedical clinics. iq, Motion S16n. A�S6n vnich revolves, rotate�, Ae� soviAB Wrts or gives the illusion of �otioa. =p, loneonforming Siaa, I.e8i1• ►�16n vhicl� l��fully existed Drior to the adoption of this Chapter, Dut doee aot comply rit� all require�ent� of tAia Chapter. Z�, permaocnt Sige. ` A aign con�tructed of eateriala including pleetic Or oetal that are 6urab]e and easily ■aintained, and vhlcA i� intended Lo be uaed for an indefinite period of ti�e. 51gns psinted directly on atructursa, vood or Yood producta are net authorized or included Sn this definition. 22. Political Sisn. A tecporary sign �dverti�ing eleetion ia�uea or the eandid�cy of a per�on runr.ing for puDlic office. 23. PortaDle Siso. A tecporary nlgn design�d to Dc eoved froc one location to �r.other and ►rhicA i� not �rmanently •ttaened to the �round, a sign atructure or a bu1�dlAg• 24. Yorts-Danel. A portable sign, eo�nted on �heels �n6 v�ed tor cocmerci�l aa vell sa civic promotions. 25, pro}ectfn8 S�gn. A sign •Ltsched to • vall, that pro�ecte qerpeedicular fro¢ a builEing or structare. Z6. Real S�tate Siaa. A teaporary aign erected for the purpoae of aelling, leasing or pro¢oting �eal estate. p7, ltoof Siaa. l aign vhich is erecte6, conatructe� or attached above the roof line of t pvllding, eYCeDt where the reof ia an extended facadde or mansard. zia.o:.z� 'S � Zld-03 21<.02.37 28. Ru�age/Garage Sale Siga. A tecporary aign xhled adverti�es or directa Lhe public to tde aale of u�ed merchandiae, aold from a private renidence. pg. Sbopping Center/Mu]tlple Dae Building. � building planned and developed for ■ultiple occupancy rLet�er aa a posnerclal or induatrial t�se. 30. ssso. � paiated panel, lettered board, serie� of letters or aymbols or other di�Dl�y and any supporting atructure uaed to �dvertiae, direct, Sdentify, infors or oonvey • meseage to �nyone �ho vlewa St. JO 31. SSgn lroa. The area of a aign, fncluding thc Dorder �nd the surface rhScR Eears the advertisement. In tAe case of �eesages, figure� or ayabols sttacAed directly to any part of a Duilding or sign atructure, it ia that area vhich ia included Sn Lhe amalleet aeometrlc figure �hich can be made to _ circuascrSbe the mes�age, figurt or iymbol. 32. Sign Area, Ma:1au�. The maximum •llovable aign •rea for a single f�ced lree standing si6n refera to that ainglt facing. Yl�cn a iree standing aign �as multiple faces, then the maximum alloyaCle aign area QouDles. 33• Sign St�uctvre. Any atructure wAich supporte or is cspable of supporting a aign, �ut not lncluding a Dullding Lo vhich a sign is attached. 3Y, Teaporar� Si6n. llny a1gn, Danner, pennant, valance or advertiaing dlsylay intended to be displayed for a 1�mlted period of Lime. 35. 1��1 Crephie. A graphlc design or decorative mural, not intended for identlfication or advertising purposes, wnich 1� painted directly on Che ezterior aurface of • Duilding. 36. xsii ssQo. � sign rhich Sa attached to the vall of a building or atruct�re. 37, Yin6or Sign. 1 sign •ttscned Lo the inside of a vindox for the purpoee of •Sexing from outaide L�e Du1lEing. TCis term does eot include mercrandiee locsted in a rindw. 2ia-oa 214.03• GF7PE1thI. PROOISZDNS FOR �1.L DISTRICfS ?hc folloving provision� ahall aDDl� to Sectiooe 27L.04 througA 21Y.07. Any sign snall De constructed in auch a tanner and of such materlal that it vill be safe and aub�tantial. Nothir� in thin Chapter anall Dc inicrpreted •e �utDorS2ing tAe erection or display of any sign not aw pe+�itteG under CGapter 205 of the City Code. t1�.0i. EICNS PaDHIEITED I11 �1.L DISSAIClS �, �ny permanent signa, other tban �overomental •16ns, e�ected or dieplayed upon any right of way Or puDlic property. ?. Any signe or vall 6raphic� that eontain rords or picturee of oDscene, pornographSc or lamoral cAaracter. g. Any aigne painted directly on Duildingn. 11. Any sign� rhich by reason of size, locatlon, eovement, content, eoloring or •anner of SIIurinatlon ■ay De confuatd vit1� the light of an emergency or road eQuipmer,t vehicle, a traftic •16n, signal Or devlce or which Aides froa viev any traffic sign, signal or device. 5, Any pro�ecting aigns. 6, Any potion signe. q. Any tl�shing sisnn. B. Any sign� located vithin a corner rision safety :one as defined in Chapier 205• 21Y.05• SIGNS PPRNITTED ZM ALL DSS?RICiS t. Id6reae S16ns• Each dvelling, Eu�ines� or Duild3n6 euet 2�ave � eini¢ua of one (1) adCreas aign, tAst i� a minic� of three and one-Aalf (3- »Z� iochee Aigh and � 6aximur� of tventy-four (2L) incAes ASgA, the �igr, euat De illu�inated or reflective and vislD�e fros tDe puDlic right of way. y. Beacn signa. Dieplayed only it Dus aioD� fa6 canaot De •ny larger than or extend DeyonC �ny poriion of the Deneb. 3. n�ss. SLall De Cisplsyed ae outlined Sa Title 96, Section 173-3'TB of the Dnited St�ten Code, State Flag and Corporate Plag• (�� Cbapter 802) 21i . O5. 3 37 General Proviaions Sigce ProEiDited in All Dietricta sian� Pcr�itieG in All Di�tricts 214-OS 214.06.38 b 5 Ooseroaental 51.aat. Infox�atioonl Sians. Provided they meet the folloving reCuirecent�: �, A�axieum aize of fonr (�) aquare feet in area. p, 1 �inlmum distance o! ten (10) feet from any proyert� line or drivevay. 6, Sastitutioaal Sians. Provided they aeet the tolloving �equirementa: A. A oeximum size of thirty-Lwo (323 sQuare feet in •res. 8. A minimua diatance of ten (10) feet tro¢ any property line or drlveMay. C. A ho�pltal emergency slgn eay De • eaximnm of 100 square feet in •�ea. 211.06. TF?1PORAAT S1GNS PERMISTED I1 �I.L D1SiAIC?S }. Con�truction Signs. A. Multiple Developmente. Construction nigne may De erected for the purpcse of identifying a development of ten (10) or aore d�e113ng�, Len (10) or eore mobile homes, tAree (3) or more multiyle dvellinge, or a puilding coneisting of three (3) or more buaine�se� or industrlea, vith tre folloving restrictlona: (t) One (1) sign per street frontage. (2) A maximum size of fifty i50) spuare fect in are• per development. (3) Located no clo�cr Lhan 100 feet to • Duilaing outside the development. (b) Il ainimum dietance of ten (t0i feet froc any property line or drlveuay. (5) To De recoved upon completion of the con�truction. B. Ot�er Developaenta. (i) One (i) aign per Duilding. (z) L maximum aize of als (6) aquare feet in area. (3) A miniaum distance oi ten (10) teet froa any propert� line or drivevaq. (�y Tp De r�oved uyoa oompletion of tEe conatruction. ua-o6 '3 .� Tempor�r� Signe Permitted !n All Diatrictn p. Alal £SLfL! 516ns. �. Multiple Developsents. Real eetate eigns aay Oe erected fo� the purpose of aelling, Ieaaing or �romoting develoycent of ten (tOl or �ore Cvellinge, ten (10) or �ore aoDile homes, three (3) or eore ■ultitle dve]l�nge or a Dvilding con�istiag of tArte (3� or ■ore puainee�e� or indu�triea, rith thc folloviag restrictiolu: (1) One (1) tign per street front�e. (2? a aa:imum size of fifty (501 apuire feet !a are• per dcvrlopment. (3} Located no cloaer tfian 10D feet to a Duilding outside of the development. (q) To be reooved rhen tAe pro3ect !a ainety-five percent (95f) �old or leaeed. I5) A QSnlmua Ol�tance ot ten (10) feet irom any property line or drive�sy. B. Other Devclopments. (1) One (1) sign per Duilding. (Z) A maximua size of si: (6) squarc feet in �rea. (3) To be reaoved �ithin li�e (5) daY� folloving t�e �alc or lea�e of the building. (L) A miniaur� distance of ten (10) feet froc �ny Droperty line or driversy. (53 �Open Houee" aign� are alloveC ortly during the day of the open hou�e. 9. Political 516ns. �. A oaximum �ize oi thirty-tvo (3�) �Cuare feet in aren. B, 7o Ee removed vltAin five (5) daye folloving the election. C. Fifteen Eollara (�15.00) vill De Eepo�Sted vith t�e City prior Lo the trection of any aigr.s and rttained until all of the a1Br� ire removed. If all of the signa are oot re=oved, tAe depo�it will be u�ed to Qefr�y the co�t of removal. �ny additional cost vill De billed to tLe peraon postiag the origioal deyosit. �, �qy sign larger thsn tAree (9) aQuare feet in •rea �u�t De placed a airtiaue distance of ten (10) feet from a street curb and tea (t0� feet froe any drivevay. 21<.OG.?D ,g U 210-07 21C.09.2B b. Ruma.age/Gsrage Sale Siges. A, A eaximum nize of three (3) aG�n feet ia area. p, io be rmoved �Sthin three (3) dep� folloving Lhe aale. 5. Hacnera or Pennents. �, Banners or pennant� eommemorating • special event not oonnected rlth • Dueinee�, �re peraitted Khen in�talled not more ihan tventy-five (25) days prior to the event and removed vithin five (5) d+9� follo�ing tbe eveai. B. Bannera or pennanta for Euaines� anniverairies or grand opening� •re allo�ed only for a eaximum of ten (10) dayn. 21Y.07. SIGNS PEAl+l1iTED YIT6 � SPECIAL DSE PERMIT 1, Automatic cAangeaDle signe are permitted in all districta exceFt residential distrlctn, and tAen only after Lre Sssuance of ■�Decial u�e perclt suD�ect Lo ihe follovlag minimum conditions: �, Contormance to the sign reQuire�ent� vStAin that Eiatrict. B. Tne mesnage ahall not change more than once every fifteen (15) minutes except for • algn diaplsying time, tes�perature and/or date. ?. Bi11Do�raa 214.08. SPECIFIC DISiPICT AEQUIRFJ'�NTS In sddition to tho�e aigns permitted Sn all districts, the following signs •re pe�itted ia each specific dlstrict �nd ahnll be regulated •s to type, aixe and aetDack �ccording to the folloving requireaents. 2t1.09• TYPES, SI2£S ►liD SETBACRS FOR RBSIDE]i7IAL DISTRICTS 1. Area Identifleation Signa. A. One (t) �ign per development. B, A maxiaua size of tventy-four (24) aquare teet in area. C, A minimum distance of tea (10) teet froa any property line or 6t2vexsy. 2, Yall Si�ns. �. One (1) algn per dvelling unit. B. A maximua aize of tLree (3) aquare feet ia area. 21�-08 90 Signs Perditted 1tStE Speclal Uae Perslt Specific DSetrlet Requirementa Re�idential DSetrlct� : 210.10. SIPES, SIZES �YD SE±BAC6S FOR CR-1 DISTRIClS �, �rea Identification Signa. �. One (1) sign per development. s, � ea,uiaum size of tventy-four (24) aquare feet Sa area• C, l ainimum dlatRnce of ten (10) fcet from •ny yropert� line or dritevay. Z. Tr�e St�ading Slsa�. , A. One (1) sign per street front�ge. 8. A■aziauc aize of torty-eight (Y8) square feet Sn �rca per develoyment. C. A eaximud helght of six (6) feeL above the flnlaheC grounC grade. D. A•inicum dSstance of ten (10) feet from sny DroDerty line or drlvevay. 9. Roof S16na. A. Oae S1) sign per dcvelo➢ment. B. TAe use of • roof sign rill suDatitute for the free st�nding aign a]ong tAe •treet the roof s�gn ia intended to De vie�ed. Y. Yindo� Siena. A maxia,� coveragc of forty percent (40f) of tLC rindo++ area, excludir.g oercAandise. 5. Yall Si6ns. Tbe Lotal aign area ana12 not e:ceeQ fifteer. (15) times the aquare root of the vall length on vhich the aign Se to Oe plaeeC. 6, port�ele Signs. May De displayed after s paruit ie iaeued Dy the City. Permi[e are llmited to tAree (3) times per year, per Dueinesn, anQ only for aoncoraecntive ten (1G3 day perioda. 2��,��, SIPES, SIZ£S UD SETBACRS FOR C-1, C-2 1!D C-3 DIS2RZCTS �, lrea Ideotificatlon S1gna. �. One (1) sign per development. 21<.11.1� 91 CR-1 Dl�trict C-1. C�2 anC C-3 Di�tricts 211-03 z�<.��.� B. A maxlm�m aize ot tventy-four (2A) aquare feet in •rea• C. A mini¢um distance of ten (10) feet from any property line or drivevay. 2, iree Standing Sign�. �. One (t) sign per atreet fror.tage. - s, � eaximus aize of eighty (SO) square feet in srea per development. C. A oaximum Aeight of trenty-five (25) feet aDove the finiahed ground erade. � D. A�inimum height ot Len (10) leet from the Dottom of the eign to ; tre ilnished Qround grade �hen witnia L�enty-five (25) feet of a _ drivevay or a corner vision aefety sone. �z E. A minimum distance of ten (10) feet from any Droperty line or drive�ray. - F. A elnimum Ci�tance af fifty (50) feet from any residcncial distriet. 3. Poof 516ne. A, One (1) sign per development. B. TAe ux of • roof algn �ill auDstitute !or tAe free st�nding aign alo� the atreet the roof aign la intended to De vleved. L. Yindov Sign�. A maxlaua coverage of forty percent (hOT) of tAa �indo� arta, excluding mercnandise. 5. vai siao�. TAe total aign srea ehall not exceed fifteen (15) tiaes the aquare root of the val� length on wnich Lhe sign ia Lo be Dlaced. 6. PorLsDle Signa. Nay De displayed after a per�it i� ia�ued by the City. Peraita are liclted Lo three (j) times per year, per busineee, and only for nonconsecutive ten (tp) day yerioda. q. BSI1Doarda. Shall De perQitted only in the G3 District xithin this Section. Specific reQuiracent� are listed unde� Section 21A.12.7. 211-10 �i�.iz.� 9s K-, .na w.z 21i.i2. TTPESr SIZYS lI� �ACCS !OR 1�1 !�'J ri-2 DISTRICSS Dlstrlets �, �rea IEentificatioa Si�u. �. Oce (t) a16� D�r developmeai. �, j�,aziius �ise of treat�-tour (2L) sau�re teet ia a»s. �, �■ini�um dist�oce o! teo (10) fset f�om aay propert� lins or �ri�way. 2. lt�ee Staodina Si�oi. �. Oce (1) �16n per �t�eet frontaae. s, � eaximum �ise of el6hty (SD) apuare feet Sn area per develoDment. C. A eaxicum pe1`ht of Wenty-tire (25) fcet rbort LAe fini�hed 6round srade. D, A sinlmum Rei6At of ten (10) fett froe t�e bottom of Lhe �16n to the fini�hed around s*aGe rt�tn vitl�in tventy-fi�c (25) ieet of � Eri�cray or • corner �iaion �sfstr sone. E. A einiaum diaiance oi tea (10) leet Troa �ny DroDerty linc or arive�.y. F. A einimum diatance of fitty (SO) feet trom any realCentl�l district. 3. 11oot st`os. �. One (1) �ign per Eeveloymeni. E. !he nae of a roof �16n vill �uDetitute for the free atanding si`n along tRe street the roof siQn !n Sntcndcd to De rieved. �, Yindor SS`ns. A �axicum coveragr ot fort7 yerceet (�Df) of tEe vindov area, excluding mercLar,Cise. 5. v,ll Sisd. �. Allore0 oaly on tvo i2) Eifferent valls per bu�iness. ', !de tot�l sign area 1Da11 not eYCted tittcen (15) time� the spuare root of tCe vall lcngth oo �LIcL CEe aign Ss to De D1aeeC. 6. lortaDle Si�u. May De dispiayeC after � pere.lt Sa ln�ued bp the Cit�. ferzits are ISmSteC to tl�ree (3) time� per Je�r, per Ouainees, and on1J for aoncor.aecutite ten (�p) pay periods. Z1�-11 �1t.12.7J 94 7. Bi1lDoards. Shall De peraitted in ooly C-3, M-1 and ?!-2 Districtn. The folloWing apecial usetpersit1LoeerecL1aebi110oardn1�ShesCityaCouacilnmay�iepose �dditional requirmeata. �. Billboard� ahall be restrleLed to property adjoining tDe rigi�t of �nya of Interatate Kighvay �694, Trunk Highvay 147, Trunk HSSIlvay i65 •ad Eest River Rosd south of Interatate HighWay f69n. 8. The maxiaut heigf.t is Lventy-five (25) feet aDove t�e flnlaheC sround grade, unle�� the aign ia intended Lo De rieved froa a hlghvay, t�en the trenty-five {25) foot maxiaua �eight ehall De computed from the centerline of the traveled l�igh�ay, Dut in no case ehall the vertical distance bet�+een tl�e Dottom of tl�e aign and the ground be reduced to lees than ten (10) feet. C. 7ha maximum aign arca Sa tAree hnndred f3pp) square feet per facing, not to exceed Lxo (2) fac:r.gs �hen erected on Ea�t River road south of Inter�tate Fiigl��ay 1694, on Trunk 81ghYay 1+17 and on irunk Hlgh�ay �65; �nd �5� aquare feet per facing, eot Lo esce�d tvo (2? facing� �hen erected on Interatate Highvay l69�• Double f�ced sign� ahall De attachcd Dack to Oaek at a Gorizontal •ngle aot to exceed forty-five (LS) degrees. D. The minimum distance �et�een billboard aign� ia 1000 feet vhen erected on the saae aide of the Algh�ay. E. She sinimum aetAack from tl�e Aigf�vey right of vay Sa thirty (30) fect. F. The minisum di�tance la 500 feet from a b111Doard sign to Lhe intersection of any atreet or raaD �here Lraffic cro��e� or mergea at the aame elevation. 7he dist�nce Sa detereined Dy eeasuring from the inter�ection of Che atreet snd highvay centerllnes and tAe aSgn. G, The minimum distance to a residential and yublic district ia 500 leet. N, 2he aign atructure ahall be all metal and be either painted or Lreated to preve�t deterioration. Lack of proper maintenance ehall be tauae !or revocatlon of the algn pe nait. I, T�e clnimum distance to a rallrosd cro�sing Ss 350 feet �hen there are lights and a gate, rnd 500 feet fros a railroad cros�ing wiLAout ligi�t� and/or a gate. J, lny lightiag vill De ahielded to eot iapair the visioa of any noto� fehicle operator or to create a nuiaance on ad�oining propertJ. 214-1Z p1A.i3. 71PES, SI2PS tAD SETBACES FOR P�iD P4D DIS2AIL?S Sign n�ulre�ente in Public and Plsnned Dnit Developcent districts vll] De coatrolled Dy the City Council vhen any developmeni ia pl�nned. _��,��, SNOPPIIG Ceil'ERS �1D MUI.TIPLE OSE DOII.DIIGS �. YSLEin 180 days of tde adoptlon of tbis C�apter, all wrxri of sAopying pentera and multiple uee DuSldSng� of Lt�ree (3) or eore Du�iae�ees or laGuetrits, if Lney Aave not already done •o, �uat suDait a comDrehenaive �i6n pl�n to the City Council tor ayproval. p. �11 ll+ture alga� erected vitAin tne sropping center or eultiple use building s�all coc:cre to the cor,rltior.� of t�e aign plan •nd may De •ub�ect Lo condition� other th�n tAo�e in tAe dl�trict regulatioru in order io promote unifor¢ sign appcarance. � � �{; i �f. 3 21L.15. SICN PFAr!IT 1ti:QDIRF?�NTS 1. Sign Per�it. A. Before • sign may De displayeC in the City, Lhe sign erector shall file an tDplication r+ith tAe City for pe�3s�ion Lo display such •Sgn. $. A per�it is required for a:l ezietiag, nev, relocated, moCified or rede�igned aign�, except thoae speclfScally exeapt under Section 21L.15.tE. • C. The lssuanre of • permlt �ay alao De auD�ect to �dditional condltion� Sn order to protcte • more reasonable cosDinstion of �Sgne �nd to promote confor¢ity vlth tAe cAaracter �nE uaee of •O�olning property. T�e conditlona vlll Dt suD}ect to the CS�creLion of tAe City. Ob�ections to Lhe conditions can De app�aled to Lhe City Council by the applicant. D. Signa erected Dy • nonp�ofit organiz�tion •re not exempt from oDtalning a sign persit Dut tAe City day valve Lhe fee requirecent. E. No pe�it i� reQuired to Eiaplay tAe following sign�. This ahall oot be cor.atrue� as re:ieving Lhe erector of a eign, or tAe owner of the Droperty on vnich a sign 1� locateG, froc conforaing xiti� the other provision� of this Chapter: (ti �t1Y rindow si6as. (p) ♦qy addrena aigns. (3) �ny aigna erecttQ Ey � 6everaaental unit. (�) lay Dench ai6ns. �ia.is.ia 95 f anC PDD DSatrlets Sho�plqg Centera �nd Multlyle Oae Bu1103o$� Sign Perilt AeQuire.enta 214-1� 21e.1�.1 (5) lny remorial aigns or t�bleta containing Lhe naee� of the buSlCiag, St� u�e and date of erectioa, whea cut or bullt into the wall of a Duilding. (6) Any aign� xhich are coeFletely within a Eullding and are aot viaiDle from the esterior Of t�e Duiltling. (7) �qy temporary signe u listed under Section 21Y.06. (p) �ny signa having aa aroa of tLree (j) aquare feet or lesa. (g) lny •dvertieing signs on liLter recepiacle� raving an •rea of fo�r (A) square feet or leee per eidc and limited to eixteen (16) eQuare feei per receptacle, ezcept that aypraval of Lhe de�ign and locatipn of L�e r�ceptacle Sa required Oy the City Councll. 2, per�lt 1DPlic�tioa. A. Applicstion for a sign qermit sha�l De eade to Lnc City on forms snDplled Dy the City. B. If a aign Aas not Deen erected vithin qinetr i90) d�ys after ihe d�te of iaeuance of a perait, the permit shall Decome null •nd •oid unle�e an exteneion i� granted Ly the City. C. TAe City eay reQuire other information •� neceesary Lo innure Lhat tAe aign ia erected in compliance rith tAis CAapter. 3. Per�lt Fees. SSgn pe+mit fee� ahall De a� provided Sn CAapter 11 of the Fridley City Code. 214.16. SIGN £AELZORS' LICENSE REQUIRi]�IiTS No per�on, firm or corporatSon aAall engage Sa the Du�ine » of erecting algns under this Chapter unles� a licen�e to do ao has Deen approved by the C1ty Council. TAe ■nnual license fet and txpiration date ahall De a� provi6ed in Chapter 11 of the Frldley City CoEe. A licenae shall not De reQulred of •ny per�on vho choosea Lo construct and erect their o�n aign on their o�n property. 21k.17. 6IISTZYG SIGNS t, $Sgn Nainteaance. !. The atructure and aurfacea of all aign� ahal] be maintained in • sate snd presentaEle condition at all tiaes, including the replacement of defeetive parta, painting, repainting, cleaning and other acts reputred to prevent the aign structure and aurface lrom becoming hazardoue or unke�Dt in appearaace. 21h1� �19 Sign Erector's License Aequirementa Exlatiog SSgn� zia.ie 8, yhea any sigc ia rmoveC, tDe Gity sLall De ootlfled anE t�e eniire 97 aign and Sta structure aGall D� r'esoved. 2. Legal Foncontor�.to8 Siga�. ♦. Any sign located vithin tbe CSty on thc date of tne adoption of Chapter�,aisc� ] gal nonconforaSng"oaign and iseper'eitt d.oDrotided�lt also eeet� tAe tolloving reQuirecents: (li ihe si6n vae cove�ed Dy • sign permit on the d�te of tr� adoytion of this Chapter, if orx vae required under applicable lav, or (2) If oo aign pernit vae teQuired for the algn in Question, tAe ' sign vsa Sn all respects 1n co�DlSance rith applicaEle l�w on tAe ' date of the adoption of thls Chapier. �8. A�SQn sliall Sa�ediately lose ita �legal nonconforming" Ceeignation Sf : (1) She •ign ia alLered ir. any yay vAic� sakc� the sign 3e�e in ' coaZliance vith the roqulresent� of tAis Chatter than St wa� Defore tAe alteration�, except for routine aiintenance and eDange of penaages. (Z) The slgn is relocated. (3) The aign Ss repl�ced. (Y) 7he sign DecoIDes Cllayidated or dacaged and tAe cost oi bringing St into coepliance is more thsn SO percent (SOf) of the value of said aign. •t xhich time �11 of tAe aign and its structure eust De removed. q, lDanConed Sisns. Any eign vAich identifiee • uae thst Aae di�continued operatlon for a period of more Lhan three (3l �onthe or any aign vhich pertair.� to a Lime, event or purpose �hich ao longer ap�liea, ahall De deesed to have Deen aDandoned. Yers.anent aSgns •yD1lcaDle to a Duaine�e tecporarily au�pended, Decauae of � char.ge of ovnersl.ip or aar,ageeent, shall not be deemed •Dandoned �nle�a Lt�e property recains vacant for • period of more Lhaa tAree I3i �nth�• 1�n abandoned aign Ss pr'ohiDi[ed �nd ahall De reeoved by tne ovrnr of the aign or the yroDerty ovner. 21�.1s. F.fIYDACF?SE1i? T�e Citr Managcr or Cesignated agrnt shall De reaponalDle for the tnforceccat of tLis Cbayter. ErSorceaeoi 21a-15 z�<.u.� 2/n.19• 4IOLATIOA:1 1, Any aign that doe� not comply ritd the provisiona ot this Chapter or Lhat ia • hazard tc Che health, safety anQ general welfare of the puDlic, is �ereDy declared to De ia violatlon of t61a Cdapter. 9' � viol.ciom p, iotification of Yiolatioo. l. If the City determiaen thet any sign reguleted Dy tEis C4apter is �afe, a�enace to the �ubliointcd to'the ov ernof rthe propertytupon vlthout a yertit first Deing g otAer rhich said aign hes Eeen erected, or ia in riolation of a�Y qrovision of thia Chapter, then the City shall iaeue a written notice aigniorabringtittintorcompllanceerithjtAe p ovisions1ofLthismChaPter vSthln twenty I20) calendar days follo�ing=Aeeco�teofftAisaremoval, auch sign(s) nay De recoved by Lhe City. lncluding any City expen�es, shall Dt a apeclal a»e��ment againet Lhe yroperty upon vhich tre �ignta3 ya� located and sh�ll De •o noted in _ Lhe rritten notice to the property wner• _ g. The City oay caux anY sign or •ign structure rhlch 1� an ismediate pualic Auard, Lo De r�oved ��sarily after • reasonable ■ttemyt pas been made to Gare the property o�+ner remo�e the sign• C. When the Ci[y oails Lhe notice of •iolation, coDie� vlll be srnt to both the perait holder ■nd tAe property o�ner. if they are ditferent per�ons. Penalt) 214.20. PF]ilII.TY �ny viol�tion of this ChRpter ia � eisdemeanor and Sa suDJect to all penalties provided for such riolations under the provision� of CAapter 901 of the Fridley City Code. EacA dsy the •iolstion continue� in exietence for1vlolationeofatheDdS�trlctorequirrment�svhcrertAeyD�re loca ed� even vhen not repuired to yay a fee or �cqulre • y��it. ADDeala 211.21. �PPEALS So provide for a rea�onable Sateryret�tioeal an interpretation�Dytthe Chapter. a permit apDlicant r�o viahes to epp City may file • variance application and reQucat a hearing before the ,aakeAtLeirID ecoicmendatioa othe1Cit� Covncilrin the�folla+ing caseses and �, tppeale where it la alleged that there ia an error in •ay order, tequireaent, decision or determination made by the City in LQe enforcement ot tdia Chapter. 21{-16 2. Aequeet� for varisnces froc the literal provisioas of this Chapter in inetancen �here Lhe strict enfarcemeni vould cauae aa undue hard�hip. 8efore the Coc�i�aion ahall grant a variance, St i� the responsibillty of tdt tDDlicant to Drovc: 1. 76at t6ere •�e e:ceptional or estraordiaary circum�tances teaerallyeto otherpprnperty SottAe samenvicSnStyu�ndtdist iotpot •DD1Y S. lbat the v�ri�nee 1a aeceseary for tQe preservatioa tnd �n�oyeent of a aubatantial property right poaees�ed by ot�er property in LAe aame �Scinity and district; but rhieh Sa denied io the property Sn puestion. C. lEet the strict •pDlieation of the CGapter vould conatitute �n unr�ece�nary bardship. D. 7l�at tAe sranting of tGe rariance rould not De materially detrlmental to ihe public Eealth, s�fety or 6eneral velfare or detrlmenta] to the property in the vlclnity or Gistrlct in v�icA the property Ss located. �, a ��, ��. 3 sia.zi.z� 99 214-1T � 11 PAOPOS£D ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY ADOP'tIG A H�t CHAPTEA 208 £NTITLfiD SATQ.LItE DISH ARTENNA BEGDLATSONS 2�6.01 PDRPOSE The purpoae of tDis Chapter ia to protect and promote the public health, safety and general Welfare of tEe City of Fridley through Lhe establishment of a comprehensive and impartiel set ot regulatlons governir.g Lhe erection and location of sate2lite dish antennas upon public or private properties. These regulet�ions are intended to provide an opportunity for effective aatellite eignal reception, ellox a reasonable amount of c6oice, and promote a concern for tbe visual aaenities on those people designing, erecting or utilizing the aatellite dish antennas while at tLe aame tlme assuring that the puDlic health, safety and general �elfare of the City is preserved. 208.02 PERHIT REQUIRED 1. Satellite Diah Entenna Permlt A. Before any aatellite dish antenna may be erected in the City, the �atellite dish antenna erector ahall file an application with tAe City for permission to erect auch an anten�a. B. A permit ia required for all existing, nev, relocated, modified, or redesigned antennas. C. 7he ianuaace of a permit �ay alao De aub�ect to addltional conditions Sn order to promote conformity vitd tGe character and uses of adjoining propertie�. 2. Permit Application �. Application for a aatellite dish antenna permit ahall be made to the City on torms aupplied by the City. b. If a satellite dish antenna.has not Eeen erected uithin 90 days after the issuance of a permit, the per�St shall Decome: null and void unless an extension is granted by the City. C. The City �y require other information as necessary to insure that the satellSte disb antenna is erected in compliance with t6is Chapter. 101 20B.03 DISTRICT R£QUIRF,1iENT5 1. Ho more tLan one diah antenna per aite ia permitted ln all zoning districts. 2. Dish antennas Laving a diaaeter of 3� inches or leea aaq be roof mounted provided the antenna and its mounting atructure does not exceed the height requ:reaents for that particular district. 3. Ao part of any antenna, tarer, lines, cable, equlpment, xirea or braces ahall extend at any time across any right-of-xay, public street, hip�way, aidewalk, bikevay or property line. 0. No exterior diah antenna having a diameter Sn excess of thirty (30) inches �hall be allo�ed in any zoning distrlet unless it complies vith the folloxing requir4bents: A. Dish sntennas ehall not De located on the roof of any structure. 8. Ground mo�nted diah antennas ahall only De located in the rear yaM and shall not De located within ten (10) feet of any aide lot line and ten (10) feet of eny rear lot line. C. Ground mounted disd antennas ahall not be located vithin Len (1Q) feet of any principle atructure. D. Cround �ounted diah sntennae ahall be located at least twentp-five i25) feet from any neighboring principle residential atructure. E. No part of any �ound �ounted QSaL antenna or ite aounting atructure may exceed 15 teet in height above grade. F. All ground mounted dish antennas and their mounting atructures ahall De acreened from Lhe right-of-vay and adjacent properties. Screening techniques ahall be auch that screening is effective throughout all seasons of the year. 5. Special Ose Permit lny atructure, other tban as noted above, that ia proposed to exceed the requirement limita impoaed Dy this Section map be L per�itted by a apecial use permit. E apecial use permit shall be considered provided St !s deterained that Lhe location and size of the use and type of operation lnvolved thereio, eball aot be injurlous to tLe public healtb, aafetp, convenience or ger,eral velfare, and shall not in�ure or ad�ersely affect tLe adjacent area or property valuea. 102 208.OA PENALTZES Anp violation of this Chapter ia a misdemeanor and ie suDject to all penalties pmvided for auch riolstions under the provielon of Chapter g01 of the Fridleq City Code. 3/5/t9/2o ���� M�nnesota t?eDenment d Enerpy �nd Econom�c De�elopment 900 Ame*�ca^ Cerne+ 8u�idmp 150Eas� Keuopg Bpulerartl bt Pbul, Mmnesoqa 55107 April S, 1965 I�lr. Nesim Qureshi City Ftaneger City of Fridley 643I University Avenue N.E. Fridle��, Rtinne�ote 55432 Dear rlr. Qureshi: �, �' ' "���1�-,?��}": �{ �--�-�+ ,� � •;t3; ;;Yc7�.�:: "+t {' -.i .r�. .r-.�. . 2 .,�: � �.e � "w�: - _ �y- �...� .�, s.+ !�.� :i�i-.�.�'.=L�:�,�:-. ,y,+� :��:�`r:�-�z•.��-:-�a ;. �.: � ��:�� ���� �// h '� " - . ,� �^� � . � t Your Community Energy Co�ncit grent epplication hes been reviewed and the Review Committee's comments and recommendations heve been referred to Commissioner Deyton. He Aas determined that your grent application can be funded as saon as the Department receives written assurance thaf the following two chenges in the proposel heve been made: I. Beceuse pf the ambitious objectives set forth in the epplication, Fridley should rank its tesks and goels to meke progrem modil+cetion easier shou) cAanges ecome necessary. 2. The Pedestrien Crossw�ali; Educetion Program would be deleted from the proposel since it is nat an energy-seving sctivity. Your applicstion wes aDsolutely first-rate. Ii demonstrates the talent thet many com- munities cen bring to the solution of Ioce1 energ� proDlems. 1f you have any questions or desire any assistence, please catl me (297-2652), or �1ark Schoenbaum (297-36D2}. 'ncerel � � oh ostovich, Direcior Community Energy programs �Clsm ce: 1�1ark Da�Kon, Commissioner Tony Ferpich, Deputy Commissioner I�tark Schoenbaum €� - � . ..•.. � • .� . AN QI�IN7�KE RF)OJDIFYING RHE FRILLEY CITX OJDE BY I�3�IDIDi� Q3APi'ER 113 fNTITLED "kF.i'USE DISFOSAL' BY R}1rAMING IT "SCLID WAS"I'E AIS�I. ADID RE�:YQ.ING Q%LECT�7': SY ADDIII� SECPIONS 113.05, 113.09 AND 113.11 AND BY AMENDING �Ci'ICY1S 213.01, 113.06, 213.07, 113.2p, 113.12 Pl� 113.13 113.01. UEFINITIIC7NS DE£INPPIiX3S Rhe follawing defir.itions shail apply in the interpretation an6 enforcement of this Chapter ano the folla%ing words ano terr.,s wY�erever Lhey occur in this Q�apter are def ineo as fnlla�s: 1. Apprave6. AcoeFteo b� the City failowing its cetermination as to aompliance with estahlisheu puGlic health practioes anci stanazr�. 2. Qnvnercial Fstablistunent. Ar:}• pre-.ises wtere a ax:m�ercial or ir�dustrial er:terprise of ar�� kirica is carried on an� shall inc2ude, but is not limite6 to, clubs, chur�2,es ano e�tahlistunents of nonprofit organizations whece food is Fre�arec or served or goods zre sold. 3��.uir�UrLt_ a��-,PTarP��:denti�d:el1ino nlace with a ki f' n /13.// �.. cactaqe. t,l+ery acc�ulation of animal, veaetables ot other matter that att�ds the prE�ration, czrnsu:.ytion, ciisZl��, cie�lir.g in ot storsge of ineat, fish, fowl, birfis, fruit and veoetables, including the Nra�Fezs wasteo alono �ith such materials. /I4.t/ 5... Ferson. Ar.y person, fiar„ Fartnersiip, association, corForation, oor.,�ny or oroanizakion of arg� kino. //5./j �,. Private Gartaoe arx3 Refuse Collectors. Rny person uho offers to or er.gages in the oollection of garbage or seiuse frar. any house� a�artreent, g3blic or privste institutian, or ornunerical establishr�ent within the Qty � Friciley. �.�ah 104 !/6.// � Refuse. l�ll solic w��te products or those havir.g the character of solids cather than liquids in that t2�ey will not flow readily without aGci:ticn�l lir,ti:d anc: Mt.i�� are ooa:.pcsec r:hclly or krtly of such materials as c�rbage, eNill Eweeping, cleanings, trash, rubbish� littet, ir.custriel salio waste or ncn�estic solic uastes; organic wastes or residue c� animals sold as meat; fruit oz other vegetable or animal natter fror,: the kitchen, dining rocxn, n�rket, or foon establishnent of any Flaces dealir.g in or hanoling meat, fowl, grain, or vegetables; offal, animal excreta, or the carcass of ar.in:zls; trees oc st�.rub tr' �„ings, gzass clippings, brick, plastez or other wzste n�atter rasultir.g frar the oa�alition, alteration or construction of buildings or structures; accim ulated waste msterisls, //cans, containers,f/ tires, junk; or other euch substances which may bear.�e a nuisanoe. :- •: . � .._ //7•1/ 1� I�bbi sh. Wood, leaves, trirRnings frrn shrubs, dead trees or branc2�es thereo�, shavings, sawdust, excelsior, w000en ware, pcinted material, //paper, paper board/! paste boarfi, grass, racs, straw, boots, shoes, hats an8 all other oar�bustihles not inclu6eci under the term garhage. �1 Sr�t id Wacte //8.// 12.� 9wi11. 4hat �rticular garbage which is whally or nearly edit�le ano useatle as e f000 and has food value for ar.i�rals or faal, accir,+ulating fror: �r.ir.al, vecetable cr other nstter u��tec fror. clut�, hotels hosFitals, restaurarts and public eatir,g places. //9.// j� Waste Fatter. t�atter cmyosen of soS1, earth, sand, clay, gravel, loaTr,, stone, brick, piaster, crockery, j/glass, glassti:are,// ashes, cinoers, shells //a�etal// and all athez noncor.,�lustible material Which has been or is to be discatoe6. 8 113.02. REF1)SE OOt�l7+.IIdERS RfQU7RID Rhe occu�nt of any private ci�elling, the keeper or manager of any hotel, motel restaurant, eatir.g house, or bcardiny house or any building where meals are secved, the aaner of arr� flat or al.artrnent house, trailer canp or auto crourt, anfi any other person having refuse as herein defined, shall provide and keep on such �.raises s�ficient oontairers for t]:e storage of all refuse acciriul�ted on the Fterisas betti:een disposal or mllection. Each such oontainer shzZl be dur�le, wetertight, shall have a tight fitting lid, shall be ia�pervious to inspects, rodents, verir,in and absorbtion of 105 �� • � �• � r» moisture, shall be fireproof, suc2� as 9alvanized metal containers ano shall not exceec 32 gallons in size imless aFprwed b� the City of Fricley. All refuse on any pra�.ises shall be storec in the cwr.tainers r�uired herein except if the same may be immeaiately consunec or oisposefl of on such prenises in an incinerator c� a type approved by> the CYty a� FricIlep. 113.03. WAP�ERCSAL QY.'TAII�LS all aam�ercial, busiress, ir�dustrial, oz other such establishments havir., a volv^e in excess of om (1) cubic yard per week, and all four (4) far,ily and largec d+ellirgs, shall prwide apFrave6 bulk or box type refuse storac,e containers or the a�:proved ecuiv�lent. 29�ese containers shall be so located as to be accessible to collection ecuigr�ent and so as not to [equire an intezmediate transfer. 113.04. YARD WASTE CLTT1�II�tERS Grass clippings, leaves and other similat reiuse may be glaced in tags or bunriles not exceecir,g three (3) feet in any dinension and not exceeding 60 po�mos in weic�t ano shall be eecurely fastened to avciu spillage. iieusehcld a�ptianees ars. furr�ture fallir.g WitY.in the defirdtion of reiuse need not be so Facka9ed. I 1 • 1. 71' •• Y• 1 Iii' All other iefuse on ar�y pra:ises shall be stocec in the containers teo,uiren by Sections 113.02, 113.03 �ud1 3.Od hezecff, exceFt as the sa:,.e a�G}� be o�nsu�.ed or &is�sefiv of or. suci, prs-ises as permitted b� said sections. 113.06 REtT1SE DISFt�1L No person shall dispose of refuse, as defir,ed in Section //113.01.6// 113�QLZ, u�on arh� lar,4s in the City of Fria'ley except on an approvc-�3 landfill sitet except that tree leaves and grass clippings m�� be storen on a pecson's pzoF,etty for the puryose of recZ•clir.g ar�enic materials as a soil conciiticner. This shoul6 be sccrnFlished so as not to create a health haiard or a nuisance to aujoinin9 pzoperties. An approveo lancifill site is a site for ciisposal of reiuse approved b� the City, o�,eratea or conducte6 in accordance With the rules and regulations of the Follution Control f,gen� �.s aooFte� in acmrciance �ith 1•:innesota St2tutes, Section ll6 � as dmencled. 113.ff1. REtvSE CCB.LD(:PIl7N �e contents of the mntainets shall be collected at least once every w�eek, or more frs,uently if neoessacy, by a mllectot Iicerssed hereu�cer. The oollector st,all transfer the contents of the containers to a aollection vehicle without spilling th�. if any spilling occurs, the oollector shall c1e�n it up cor,�pletely. Upon such colleetion, the oontairers shall be crnpletely e�!ptie6 and the 106 �• ` `Y • �� � a� �� • ► �� � a• . � r• �� Y' � ii' RF.�USE DISPDSAL �r a • lids of the oontairers shall be reFlaeed. �: ;s,q « �.. �� a,bY �. � : � • � w� • ; �+y 'f •• v � r• 1, F�sceyt for purFoses of collection, all refuse must te plecea in the rear of the pracises, or it may be glaced in the side yard setback if scre�e2 so as to be out of vi�. frcr. the street, or in n garage locateb on the pcenises. 2. 2he follarir.g special connitions may be useo to make refuse mllection moze aonvenient: F,. Refuse, except that which is storeQ in a container, as c3efineo in Section 113.02 and 113.03 of this Chapter, may be Flacen acij�cent to tt,e curb oc elsewhere GR the F:erson's pcoperty. B, Refuse storen in oontair�ers as mentionefi in Section A abwe, uay be glaceo imnEtiistely a�jeoent to tt�e front of the rm�elling i.u�it, but no further tr,an three (3i feet frar. the huilc3iny. 3. EJccept for oorneniPnce of oollection, no wntainers or reiuse will be allowed in the front yard for more than twenty-four (24} },ci:rs. � � • �. �. ;abr.•' _ ..yx: . ' •_ •�• - l:�� ; ' 1. �. �� .�q� '� • ■71t-� ..�.-. - �-� � �- � -� ' _ _-�'__'___"_ //113.09.// 113�1L nEF�CrIVE BF,�E aoear��xS whenever a L€�u,s.e oontainer is in pooz reFzir, is corroded or otJ�ecwise defective so as to perrSt insects, verr�in or rocients to enter, or aces not meet any other tec,uiza-er,ts of this f�a�,tez, the oollector shall notify the a.ner persondlZy or by affi�cino a cop� c8 a rrotioe to the oontainez. The notice shall state the oeficiency and shall reouire repair or replacement prior to the next ool2ection If the deficiency has not bEen corrected, the wllector shall notify tk,e City. Zhe City shall then inspect saifl container and if found oeficier.t, oonoern s�ne and oroer its renwsl. 107 : a4 � ��. ��. y �� •M� �. ; _ Y u w i �• w: y � •.�; � •. � ■- � ; a4 « i�. :.n � a� ti a• • o r 1. L�.027L92 Rf.oUliBpPJit. 2Yo person shall enga9e in hauling or aonveying refuse or recyclable material fzm ar.y pra,ises, ether than their a�n dor,.icile, in the Ciky inless that person hnlds a vslid lioense here�c;et, Each such vei,icle so usen a�ust be licensed, 2. License Prooedure. A Rhe prwisions of the License arxi Pemit Chaptez, Q;apter 11 of this Code, including the license fee shall a�ply to all lioenses rer;uired b� this Chapter and to the holdezs of 6nch lioense, 9he tean c� each lioensE herew�aer si;all be frm. May 1 tt;zour'h April 30 for kefuse Iiaulers and frar June 1 throuoh Mav 3,i?OC Recvclina Hd�lers. B. 7t�e apglication for license or renewal of license sha21 contair. a descriFtion of tr.e t���s and nakes of the motor vehicles usea for collection, e scheoule of aervioes to be mace to tr�e custcmers, the frequency of service to be renoecer] and full inforretion as to where es,d how the naterial �llected will be o.isposec of anc any otr,er inforroation the City of Fridley shall reouire. Aptlicants for licenses, after July 1Q, 1475, desiring to provide routine veekly collection anfi tenoval of refus�e frar. resioenoes shall pcovide, as recuired under this Cha�ter, complete collection of all refuse which nozmally results £cor 6ay to da�� use of t1,is type of propezty except furnishings, appliances, building or cortstr�ction westes and sirrilar bulky wastes foz which inoividuals must make specfal arrar,c�.ents. Rhe City aay� reouize vehicle inspection before prooessino the license spglication. G ApFlications for license hezeun6ei st;all City for reyic�,� ano reo�unerKation. If the that the public need, wnvenienoe, ano g000 ther�, it ma}� crw-:t a lioense to any such the re;uic��ents of this Q�aI#er. 3. I,icense Qassification. be sutr itteci to the Council is satisfied orciez will be senrec3 application meeting AF}�licants for licenses issued hereuni,et stall be i�suea for the following cla:ses of operations: Qa`s I- Residential Refuse O�llection Vehicle Qass II - Ornu��rical ano Busir�ss kefuse Collection Vehicle Qass II2 - Residential and Car�erical Refuse �ullectior, Ve}:icle Qass N- Rubbish ann DJaste I•atter Oollection Vehicle Qass V- P.�seerino Collection Vehicle �j�c � - �vclina Cr�llection Vehirla 4. Insurance. :- - :- ApRlicants for licenses or r�ec:als of licenses shall file with each application a cop� of an insurance g�licy oz policies and an endvroane.nt, is,der vhich there is ooverage as to each vehicle 103 f� w v :. :,n ti �• t� 109 to be used for loss or danaoe to per=ons ir. the atrount of $100,000 for ead� person ann ;300,000 for each accifient; and for loss or d�r�a� to propezty in the ar.oimt of 550,000. EVery such policy shatl provibe that it shall not be cancelled or terminaten for arry� reason without at least tes� (10? de1's vritt.� notice thereof first being given to the City. f:�f:�.�"^i� � • . - t�71 5. Hours. h'o person engaged in hauling refuse, garbage /jfoz hire// QZ �v�y��hle m2terial frorr: residential areas within the City of Frioley� shall do so before 6:30 A.M. or after 8:30 P.F., m any day. Etitheanore, hauling frar oamnercial, business, in6ustrial, or oti�er such estahlistunents shall not reasonahly interfere with, ot create a nuisance for, aojacent resiaenti�l areas. There shal 1 be no ' Sg�v�linc" garbaoe or refuse pick-up fiae: residential properties on Sur,day. b. vehicles. P. FzcY� vel�icle far which a lioense is apFliea for or wY:ich is licenseo shall De subject to inspection tr� the City of Ftioley at the annual rer,e�:zl date and at all reasonable times. Any 6urh vehicle, ahile it is used by the licensee in the City of FYicileY�, shall have the naz:�e rff the lioensee clearly printed on both sides. �pr refuse vehicieG said lettering shall be at least three 13� inrl�es ir. heic,ht an6 the o�lor c� the lettering and of the backgroimd shall be aontrasting. B. Each licensed Zefi]5S vehicle shall have attached a decal to be issuen b� the Qty shoWin9 the cucrent registzation. The aecal shall be affixed to the outside of that portion of the truck boc"�• used to hold garbage or zefuse. Old, expireo ot otherwise invalid decalcor..ania shall be removec fror,. the vehirle. C, D�e body of every s�flasQ vehicle licensed i,ereu�n6er sta!1 t�e oonstructen er.tirely of inetal or t}�e sFace in the vehicle in Which refuse st�all be kept st,all be ar.Fletely lined witi, metal. P11 joints shall be effectively closed so that no drip�ing or leaking oc nrain off of water, liquids or any substances can occur. 4he loading space shall be provided witi; a heavy tacpaulin or equivalent mver fitten with eyes, gror.Jnets, tie ropes, or hooks so thst the cover car, be securely over the loaded refuse. A�ery vehicle used for mllection c� garbage ot swill shall have a pennanent met�1 mvez. Every vehicle shall be equipped with the necessary hano tools for cleaning up spills. D. E.Yery v�icle licensen hereimder shall be keYt well �ainted, clesr, an6 in 9ood re�ir. �rery� such ��fuse vehicle used for oollecting gartage oc swi11 sha21 be clearreo every we�, or more �ten if necessaty, to prevent persistent 000rs an6 shall be cleaned before being used for any other pirposes. E. Rt��clables, garhage, cefuse, rub6ish, or other waste mattet shall be loaaeo so that none � such matezials can jar loose armi fall to the grounn or street wY.en the vehicle is in motion. Loose paper, trash, and simil ar materials shall be so secured that tiic3° cannot be disglaced by the Wind or fa11 out of the vehicle. Cbntainezs used to carcy refuse in or on an1� vehicle ahall arngly With the cequicenents of Section 113.02 hereimder. F. . No person shall at any t.ime perk or store a� ��lina or reiuse mllection vehicle on any prsnises zoned for use as a sirx3le oi multiple resioence dwelling, within orn himdren (100) fEet of ar�� afora �tioneo �ce�.ises, or witr,in two h�cired (200) feet of ar:y food establislmient, for piupose othec than, or for yeriods inconsistent with, providing iecycline or refuse collection at said prer.ises. No person shall at ar.y time park or store any loaded or partislly loaaed recyclina or ref use oollection v�icle on any� pre�.ises witr�ir. the City, except for the purpose of and for periods consistent vith, providing tecvclina or ref use mllection at that parael of propezty. 7, C�noellation o� $QfySE Servioe. 74�e coliECtor shall cancel service to an�� permises �:her. the only contairer or oontairers theieon have been oonderne6, ano may cancel service when the �rty d�argeable foz the oollection service is tvo (2) maiths or more weraue in paying for such service. When any collector cancels serviae to aml pca,ises, written notice thereof shsl.l be cerved uFon or mGiled to the occu�nt, aarac,+er, oc wnec c� the prenises and a oop� nf the notice shall be maileo to the Gity. !/113.11.// ]l�].3� Aaia2fagarr oe x�vse r�rnv�� Arsy accunulation c� reiuse on ar�y prsnises not storcc in containers vi,ich arngly with this Q�apter� or an�° accu�ulation of refuse on arry praises is hezetry c3eclareo to be a nuisance and ehall be abated by oroer cif the City, as provideo ty YSnnesota Statutes, :ection 145.22 and 145.23, anfi the cost of abater:�ent may be assesssed on the �.soperty vhere the nuisanoe was foimd, as pzwic3ed in said sections. //113.12./J 11�,i4. LITPFR A:innesota Statutes, Section 609.68 are here�ry adopted by reference and shall be full force ano effect in City of F�i�.le� as if set out here in full. //113.13.// ],13,15.. FEFS Rhe lioense fee and expiration date shall be provioe6 in Chapter 11 o�E Fri�cy City O�de. //113.14.// 113..1�. Ff3�PI'ALTZFS Any vic�lation of this Chapter is a nisfieneanor ar.o subject to all penalties provided for such violation under the provisions of Q,apter 901 of t2�is Oode. : a �a • ti ��� . I YM Yi � � :a.2vc _ � • 110 CITY Of FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING M�'�RCH 26, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Wellan called the March 26, 1985, Environmental Quality Comnission meeting to order at 7:39 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: 7om Gronlund, Richard Svanda, Wayne Wellan, Maynard Nielsen (arr. 8:05 p.m.) Members Absent: Bruce Peterson Others Present: Susan Merriam, Planning Aide Earl Frank, Hauler Connie Metcalf, SORT Meradie Selin, SORT APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 19, 1985, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GQMMISSI�N MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Gronlund, seconded by Mr. Svanda, to approve the February 19, 1985, Environmental Quality Commission minutes as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Vice-Chairperson Wellan declared the motion carried unanimously. 1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW SECRETARY FOR COMMISSION: LAVONN COOPER Lavonn Cooper was introduced to the members of the corranittee as the new cortmission secretary. 2. REVIEW OF DRAFT SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACT AND BID FORMS FOR THE PROPOSED FRIDLEY CURBSIDE PROGRAM a. Propos"al for the Plans, Specifications, and Special Provisions Mr. Svanda asked the purpose of paragraph 4, "(I) (We) further propose to do all Extra Work which may be required to complete the proposed service, at unit prices ..."; and Ms. Merriam indicated that this paragraph was included to cover service for missed pick ups. Mr. Svanda suggested that the time period in paragraph 5 be specified as ten (10) working days so that there would be no confusion with calendar days. Mr. Svanda also suggested changing the date in the last paragraph to the first day of July to provide sufficient time for all the work that remained to be done. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISbION MEETING, MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 2 8idding Requirements Mr, frank questioned the need for a bidder's bond. He indicated that several other municipalities have not required a bidder's bond and that the City would not incur any loss of funds. Ms. Merriam agreed to discuss the suggestion with staff. c. Speciftcations Susan Merriam distributed copies of draft Specifications for the proposed curbside recycling program. The following areas were discussed: 1) Definitions. Mr. Frank discussed ways tn which residents could ass�st the hauler inc7uding removing the tops and bottoms of tin cans and flattening (it is not necessary to remove labels), removing metal rings from glass containers, sorting glass by color, and storing used oil in a plastic container with a screw-on Cap. The committee felt that these were good suggestions, but felt that they would not need to be tncluded in the Specifications to the haulers, but rather be included in publicity for the recycling program. Ms. Merriam indicated that they wanted to make recyclTng "easy" in order to appeal to a]arge percentage of the households. 2) Contractor's Services & Responsibilities. The committee felt it important to specify that the contractor include in the plan to the City the "stated dates for pick up and solutions for missed collections." Missed collections can become a problem for.both the hauler and the City if not properly handled, and the method for handling needs to be defined. Mr. Frank questioned the collection on the day following a holiday indicating that this is often the poorest time for participation. Ne felt that providing service within a week of a holiday would be sufficient. Mr. Svanda suggested the use of a quarterly calendar rather than an annual calendar. He further suggested that the calendar be incorporated with the quarterly publicity for the program and that this be included in the City newsletter. The hauler could provide the schedule and the City could handle the printing and publicity. The comnittee felt tha° the City newsletter would be the most effective way to reach all the households in the City of Fridley. The comnittee also agreed that the quarterly calendar would be more likely to be saved and used than an annual calendar. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CaMMIS5I0N MEETING, MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 3 The question of funding for publicity was raised. Mr. Merriam indicated that funding was not a problem. Funds were available from the MPCA for recycling, and the City �f Fridley has requested funds from the County of Anoka who as yet have not responded to the request. Ms. Merriam a75o informed the comnittee that a copy of the request to the County had been forwarded to County Cottmissioner Paul McCarron as a reminder. 3) Contractor's Equipment. Mr. Fra�k asked whether all vehicles were required to be painted and marked identically. Ms. Merriam indicated that vehicles shall be painted a�d/or marked the same. Connie Metcalf questioned the need for radio dispatch vehicles. She felt that questions or problems could be handled satisfactorily tV�rough recorded telephone messages, Mr. Wellan felt the radio dispatch should be left in the Specifications, but indicated that bidders have the option of submitting an alternate bid waiving certain conditions in the Specifications. 4) Contractor's Operations. Mr. Svanda questioned the need for at least three years experience in the business of curbside recycling collection and marketing. Experience would be reflected through references. Mr. Wellan indicated that he would prefer to see a minimum amount of experience required and suggested a minimum requirement of one year's experience in the business of curbside recycling collection and marketin9. The commfttee decided to delete the requirement for office hours since customer calls and complaints can be handled through the use of a telephone recording device. Several persons disagreed with the stated requirement for providing service to those who have not received scheduled service. Connie Metcalf stated that residents will place recycable materials out after the scheduled time and the contractor should not be held responsible for pick up under those circumstances. The committee felt that a reasonable amount of time to provide service should be established, and after discussion felt that two working days would be satisfactory. 5) Public Awareness. Mr. "Jielsen inforrt�d the group that the Fridley Lions had donated $50Q to the recycling program. �400 would be used for signs and $100 would be used toward the newsletter. Ms. Merriam showed the group an article on recycling that had appeared on the front page of the Fridle Focus. She also indicated thet additional coverage was being p anne , inc uding advertising in the Fridley Focus. The comnittee also discussed ways to get information to City residents. Suggestions included inv�lving cortmunity groups such as the Jaycees, boy scouts, etc. However, the City newsletter seems to be the most effective method of reaching the most househalds. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COM�4I55ION MEETING, MARCN 26, 1985 PAGE 4 6) Preparation for Coilection. Mr. Svanda questioned the inc7usion of paragraphs 6.1 and 6.2 in the specifications. Connie Metcalf said that this information lets the Contractor know what is expected. Meradie Selin also suggested that under certain circumstances the Contractor shouid be allowed to refuse to pick up materials left at curbside, such as large appliances, improperly packaged materials, and trash. 7} puration of Contract. contract is two years. specifications include year. Ms. Merriam stated the duration of the The committee recommended that the the option of a possible review after one 8) Payment. Ms. Merriam indicated that the Contractor would receive an initiai payment and payment based on a participation rate. Tfie C�ty hopes in this manner to shorten the time of the subsidy and to make the program self-sufficient. 9} Filing of Reports. Mr. Gronlund suggested that the monthly summary of the quantity of each category of recyclable materials collected be kept o� a month-by-month basis, but submitted on a quarteriy basis along with the quarterly financial report. Ms. Merriam was asked to review the suggestion with staff. 10) Access to Records. Ms. Merriam indicated that the City wishes to have the option to review the Contractor's records. The manner in which these records are kept will be left to the discretion of the Contractor. 11) Insurance. Mr. Frank indicated that the insurance covera9e was higher than that asked by some other cities and that premiums for insurance were quite expensive for the hauler. Mr. Frank stated that rated in Excelsior were $240,000 for general liaDility-one person; $500,000 general liability-two or more persons; and $50,D00 for damages to property. Rates in Edina were $100,000; $500,000; and $50,000 respectively. 12) Performance Bond. Mr. frank stated that he felt a bond was not necessary and that no bond had been required in several other cities. The committee had no changes on the remainder of the specifications. d, Bid Sheets. Ms. Merriam indicated that changes would be made on the bid sheet and that any one wtth questions could give her a call. ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY COhP1ISSI0N MEETING, MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 5 3. DISCUSSION OF PUBLICITY FOR THE FRIDLEY CURBSIDE PROGRAM Publicity was discussed as a part of the Specifications. 4. DISCUSSION OF NEIGHBORHOOD ENERGY WORKSHOP PROJECT COMMITTEE f�. Merriam info rn�ed the committee that application had been made for a $15,00� grant from the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development to fund an energy conservation program. These funds would be used to conduct energy workshop programs. 5. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Connie Metcalf asked if the City was planning to change the ordinance regarding curbside recycling and also asked the City to consider changing another ordinance to charge residents a"per can" fee for refuse so that people would pay for the amount of trash they generated. b. Susan Merriam distributed a memo regarding the weed harvestTng on the west basin of Moore Lake and indicated that a public hearing on this subject would be held on April 3, 1985. The proposal states that the City would pay for the first weed harvest and subsequent costs would be paid by the residents in the area being se wed. c. Susan Merriam updated the co�nittee on the status of the complaint regarding Industrial Spray Painting, Inc. The MPCA has scheduled an inspection during the first week in April, and the County of Anoka has been informed of the complaint. A0.]OURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Svanda, seconded by Mr. Gronlund, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Vice-Chairperson Wellan declared the March 26, 1485, Environmental Quality Commission meeting adjourned at 9:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, avonn Cooper Recording Secretary CITY Of FRIDLEY PARKS 8 RECREATION COMMISSIOPI MEETINf, APRIL 1, 1985 ............... CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Kondrick called the April l. 1985, Parks & Recreation Comnission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Mary Schreiner, Steve Nelson Members Absent: Dick Young, Dan Allen Others Present: Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director Jack Kirk, Recreation Supervisor Doyle D. Mullin, 1233 Hathaway Lane Kate Kemper, 7857 Alden Way N.E. Phyllis Forsberg, 1404 W. Danube Rd. Jim Black, 7824 Alden Way N,E, Ed Meyer, 3980 Woodridge Circle Judi Janiak, 1655 Mississippi St. N.E. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 4, 1985, PARKS & RECREATION CON6�1IS5ION MINUTES: MOTSON BY MS. SCHREINER, SECONDED BY MR, NELSON� TO ,9ppROVE THE FEB, 9, 1985, PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMISSION MZNUmES WITX TNE CORBECTZON THAT "BRUCE NELSON" BE CRANGED TO "STEVE NEZSON", UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON RONDRICX DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRZED UNANI1dOUSLY, APPROUAL OF AGENDA: MOTION BY ldR. NELSON� SECONDED BY 145. SCXREIl7ER� TO AppROVE THE AGENDA AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL f/OTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARF,D THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY, 1. DIRECTOR'S REPOR7: a. Springbrook Nature Center Foundation Renort Mr. Doyle Mullin stated he was the Chairperson of the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation. He introduced the other Foundat{on members who were also at the meeting. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING; APRIC 1, 1985 pAGE 2 Mr, Mullin stated that exactly ten years ago on April 1, ]975, the Citv of Fridley signed a lease aqreement with Sprirtgbrook Nature Center Foundation for the development of a nature cen±er at North Park. It was a five year lease and the first requirement was to submit a plan for the development of tfie park and to carry out that plan, At the end of the five year lease, they had pretty much done what they had aqreed to do; there was a great deal of development, traiis and programs. In conjunc- tion with working wit� City Staff and elected officials of the City, they had secured sufficient funds for the building of the interpretive center at the park. In viewing wfiat their role was, thev eTected at that time to write a letter to the City Council stating they thought it was more appro- priate that the stewardship of the park be under the Citv, rather than under a private grouo. They also suggested the lease not be renewed for any additional funding for development, 6ut tfiey said they wouid continue to be involved, interested, and available, and act as a conduit betw2en the City, the Parks & Recreation Cqnmission, and ot�er citizens interested in the park. Mr. Mullin stated he thought they saw themselves in the role of citizen activists with broad interests, but a single-minded purpose in their involvement with the Nature Center. Mr. Mu]lin stated that in talking about the uark, they can talk about it in the abstract--that they really have to get down to the use of the park in order to appreciate it. He stated the Commission members had received a copy of the annual report� and he would like to reiterate a couple of things in that report. For example, there were 50,000 visitations last vear. figuring an average of about two hours per visitation, there were 100,000 hours spertt at tfie Nature Center. 7here were 400 different programs put on by City Staff, 22,000 hrs, of participation time in those pro4rams, There were people from 24 countries, 37 states, and many cities within the State of Minnesota. While they were not there to manage or develop a national park, they could be proud and pleased that there are fellow citizens who view the Nature Center as such a significant place that when they have visitors from foreign countries or other states, they want to bring them to the Nature Center. The number of partic9pant hours in the programs shows how well the citizens invo7ve themselves in the use of the park, Mr. Mullin stated that other than just the numbers using the park, there is also the quatity of the park. Many people using the park experience things which go beyond just simply becoming involved in plants and animals. Mr. Mullin stated. he would like to comrnent briefly on the efficiency with which the park is run. The Naturalist Department did an informal survey of �all the nature centers in the metro area. Considering parks at least as well developed as Fridley, they found tfiat 5pringbrook had a lower budget, fewer people, more volunteers, more programs, more proqram hours, and visitor hours than any other nature center in the area. That was a tribute to Dr. Boudreau and his staff, PARKS & RECREATIQN COMMTSSIOW MEETING; APRIC 1; 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Mu11in stated that as far as the future of the park, he thought thev could accept the fact that as the metropolitan area becomes more and more developed, the need for green spaces is necessary. The 50,000 visitors are about 6alf of what they think the park can handle, and thev feel they will reach 100,000 in a few years. To handle that amount of people, they need sane additiona] development, staff, and additional programning. He tfwug�t t6ose things could be achieved as the City accepts its responsi- bility. He thought they could also involve other conxnunities in those funding requirements, if the City chooses to do so. Mr. Mullin stated, again the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation would like to offer tfieir Services to the Comrnission. They will continue their activist role, to be available, and to be a conduit between the City Council,�q�qssion, and citizens. Ms. Schreiner• asked how many other nature centers there were in the seven- county metropolitan area. Mr. Mullin stated there were 10 nature centers including Springbrook Nature Center. Mr. Nelson asked Mr. Mullin what he meant when he said he felt they could involve other communities in funding requirements for the nature center. Mr. Mullin stated that before the lease agreement was even signed by the City Council, they did receive and do f�ave in their files letters from the four schoo) districts witE�in tfie 6oundaries of Fridlev saying they would be hanpy to participate in some way in the funding of programning at the nature center. It was not syecifically soelled out--wf�ether on a per pupii basis, annual basis, or whatever, but they know the nearby communities (Coon Rapids, Spring Lake Park) woutd be willing to particivate in some way. He knew the City of Fridley had intergovernmental agreements in various levels for fire protection, sewers, etc., and he would think such an agree- ment could be reached for the Nature Center, particularty if they considered a full time staff person who would deal only with curricula for the schools. Right now the Nature Center staff has to turn down requests for programninq from schools because there is not adequate staff time. Ms. Schreiner stated it has always been her concern that as they continue to fund from the Citv or whatever as a tax base that the Nature Center does not have a wide enough tax base. This subject was brought up a couole of years ago, and it has dlrtast been a"no no" that the City consider anv type of charge, She could understand that because people would not stop 6y whenever they wanted to for fear of having to pay a fee. But, when they considered the numbers tbat have been coming to the park from out of the Fridley area and when it does take additional staff time for progra+�- ming, an additional charqe should be considered. She wondered if the idea of an additional charge for additional educational programs could be pursued a little bit more. ___ _ PARKS E� RECREATION LOMhIISSION MEE7ING, APRIC 1; 1985 PAGE 4 Mr. Kondrick stated there are a lot of fantistic thinqs happening at tfie Nature Center, and maybe more information such as this should be disseminated to tfie citizens. Mr, Mullin stated t6at last year tf�e Sprinqbrook Nature Center sponsored a Fall Festival, and they dre going to do it again this fall. One feature wiil be a"Uo7ks March", an internationa] activity that started in Germany many years ago. They f�ave contacted tfie Hennepin County Volks March group. who have agreed to host this Volks March at Springbrook Nature Center as part of the Fa11 Festivai. He stated this is something the Citv might want to publicize. The Fall Festival wilt be two days this year, because the Vo1ks Marcf� has to be two days. Ms. Kate Kerrtper stated the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation has had some real concerns about the entrance fee. They had seriousl,v considered this idea about 2-3 years ago. They did a little survey and discnvered that many fathers were coming during the week with children and peeple out of work wfio could not afford io come if they f�ad to pay for any kind of tour of the Nature Center, Sf�e stated she felt that realiy renewed a conviction that there should not be that kind of penalty for anyone want- ing to come into the park and walk around, Mr. Mu11in stated they support the concept of a fee for specific programs that utilizes staff. Persona7ly, he would rather see them go to the school districts for money up front so they could hire a person to develop the progra�ning. He was afriad that with the level of staffing the City has noti•�, they do not have time to develop a significant program that could be sold ta the school districts--which was really the better way to go. Mr. Ed Meyer stated he was very proud to be a part of the Springbrook Nature Center Foundatfon 8oard. It was exciting to 6e able to come to the Commission meeting to heip the Commission in any way better understand what is going on and to help otf�er people understand what is going on at the Nature Center. They hoqe the Commission would feel free to ask the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation to do whatever they can to help the Commission and the City. Mr. Kondrick thanked the members of the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation for coming to the meeting and sharing this information. b. Sumner Fees Mr. Kirk stated there were three fees they were bringing to the Comission for approva7: Softball, Playgrounds, Tiny Tots. The proposed fees were as follows: Teams registered with the State -$285 ) approx. 10% increase Fun League -$255 ) over last year (Mr, Kirk reminded the Comnission that they do charge a$20 non-resident fee that was instituted last year for people who do not live in the City but participate in the recreational leagues.) PARKS & RECREATION COMMiSSION MEETIN6, APRIL 1 1485 PAGE 5 Playgrounds -$21 up from �20 ; max, per family -�34 up from $32) Tiny Tots -$16 �up from $15�; max, per family -$22 �up from $20) Dr. Boudreau stated that because for years people had said they wanted t� play two games a week, last year they went to two games a week for a couple of the leagues. Because of this, games had to be scheduled at 9:45 - 11;:00 p,m. with lights, Many complaints were received about the lights, noise, and cars. Informally, they took a survey of those nlaying two nights a week �nd found that half of those teams did not want to play twice a week. So, tfiis year tfiey are 6ack to one game a week, a�d the last game on any of the fields at the park is scheduled to beg9n at 8:45 p.m. The lights should be off and the park cleared by 10:00 p.m, He stated this should help them publit relations-wise with the neighbors, and it will help the concession workers and maintenance people. MOTION BY MS, SCHREINSR� SECONDED BY MR, NELSpN� Tn AppROVE THE FEES FOR 50FTBALL, PLAyGROUND pROGRAM ,�1(yD TINY TOTS PROGRAM FOR 1985 AS RECOMMENDED SY STAFF. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXRZRPERSON KONDRICX DECLARED TNE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. c. Softball Tournament Request Mr. Kirk stated that right now they have three requests for softball tournaments for this sumner. 1. Request from Knights of Columbus for a men's and wanen's softball tournament for May 17-18-19. This is the seconA year for the Knights of Columbus. He stated they have collected 1/4 of the rental fee. 2. Request from FYSA for a youth girls' softball tournament during tfie 49'ers Davs for June 14-15-16. This will be co- sponsored by the City Parks & Recreation Dept., and there will be no fee. 3. Request from the Frid7ey Tiger Hockey Booster Club for their 9th annual softball tournament on June 28-24-3Q, They have collected 1/4 of the rental fee. Mr. Kirk stated he believed the Jaycees were planning on running two state tournaments for the Minnesota Recreation & Park Association in August. Ne did not have those requests at this time. MOTION BY MR, NELSON, SECONDED BY MS. SCNREINER, TO AppROVE THE THREE TOURNAMENTS AS REQUESTED ABOVE FOR TXE SUM/yER OF 1985. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICX DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. _.._. ._ PARKS & RECREATION COMh1ISSI0N MEETINf, APRIL l, 1985 pAGE b Dr. Boudreau stated that in conjunction with this, he has received a copy of a letter addres5ed to Mayor Nee from a group thaL is requesting that the City Council waive the $600 softball tournament rental fee. He stated the Commission spent a lot of time in establishing this fee last year, and he w�uld recommend that the Commission recommend to the City Council that the City Council not set a precedent 6y waiving the $6d0 fee for any non-profit organfzatfon. Mr. Kondrick stated the Comnission did spend a great deal of time in setting this fee, and they set that fee for a number of reasons. They aiso felt it was a fair and reasonable fee. BY�MR. NELSON= TI{AT THE PARXS 6 'S POSZTION THAT�S600 BE CHARGED TO ALL �OF �TXS GpMMUNSTY�� �MENTS AND WOIILD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY CDUNCZL THAT NO FEES BE�WAIVED U?ON R VOSCE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPER50N KONDRSCX DECLARED TIIE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, d, V.F.W. field Request Dr. Boudreau stated the Commission had received another request from the VFIJ for a Minnesota Special 0lympics Softball Tournament at the Community Park on Sunday, July 14, 1985, Last year, the Commiss�on had received a similar request; however, t�e VFW did not hold tfie tournament as they did not get tfie bid frpm the Minnesota VFW. He stated that date was open, and tfie City would enjoy accommodating the VFW for this event. MOTION 8Y MS. SCHREINER� SECONDED BY MR, NELSON� TO APPROVE THE REQi7EST FROM THE FRIDLEY VFW POST N0. 363 FOR R MINNESOTA SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOFT- BALL TOURIiAMENT ON JULY 24, . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON XOND127CK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. e. Totino Grace Hockey Rink Request Dr. Boudreau stated the Commission received a copy of a 7etter from Totino Grace High Schoal asking the City that if they construct a hockey rink south of tF�e schooi and they maintain the rink, would the City supply the water? He stated he has discussed this with John Flora, and Mr. Flora said it was fine but there should be some type of ineter on the hydrant to meter the water used by Totino Grace, and Totino �race should pay the Citv for the water. Dr. Boudreau stated he could meet with Mark Loahr, Head Hockey Coach, who had written the request, to discuss this further. Dr. Boudreau stated he wou7d like to suggest to Mr. Loahr that the rink be relocated across the street at Faith Academy as that might be a better location to help the City and the schooi. PAP,KS & RECREATION COMPIISSION MEETING, APRIL 1; 1985 PA6E 7 The Commissioners stated they had no problem with this and encouraged Dr, Boudreau to meet with Mr, Loahr. Dr. Boudreau stated �e and Mr. Flora would contact Mr. Loahr, and he would bring back More information to the Comnission. f. Cancel Lease - Burlington Northern Dr. Boudreau stated tbe City has a lease with Burlington Nortfiern for the small area off Main St, right across from Plymouth Park. He stated the only things there are two soccer goals and a littte bit of playground equipment. The area has not been used for three years, so he would recommend they pu11 out tfie equipment and just not use the area, If tfie area continues to not be used t�is year, then they will look at cancelling the lease with Burlington Nortfiern for next year. 2, OLD BUSINESS: a. Meadowland Park Improvements Dr. Boudreau stated the Commissioners had received some information regarding the Meadowlands Park Development Ptan. Dr. Boudreau stated that for the Commission's information, the City was looking at selling the six lots off the east end of the Meadowtands Park which was an area that was not used by the park and the City was looking at extending Oakley St. to connect it out to the service road. Dr. Boudreau stated he would continue to keep the Commissioners informed as to what the City was trying to do with the park to make it a more usable park, If tfie Commissioners had any input, they should contact John flora. b, Letter to F.Y.S.A. Dr. Boudreau stated that after the Commission had talked to the HAF and had decided to go with a flat fee of paying the NAF $3/participant, Staff felt it was such a good idea that they talked to the FYSA about the same approach. He stated on feb. 27th fie had written a letter to the FYSA regarding this. He would recommend tfie Cottmission approve this per participant fee retroactive to Jan. 7. 1985. MOTION BY MS, SCHREZNER� SECONDBD BY 11R, NELSON, TO APPROVE THE S3 PER PARTICIPANT FEE IZEIMBURSEMENT Tp TNE FYSA AND TO MAKE THE FEE RETROACTZVE 1Y7 JAN, 1, 19B5. UPON A VOICE YOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED (INANIMOUSLY. PA{�,KS S RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING; APRIt 1, 1985 PAGE 8 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. NELSON� SECONDED BY MS. SCNREINER, TO ADTOURN TRE MEETZNG. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CFIAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLAHED TXE APRIL 1� 2985� PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:00 P,M. Respectfully subm't� , �x:� ynn Sa a Recording Secretary 2 CITY OF FRIDLEY ENERGY PROJECT COt�1I7TEE MEETING I4PRIL 2, 1985 CALL 7._�ER: Chairperson Saba called the April 2. 1985. Energy project Comnittee meeting to order at 1:32 p,m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dean Saba, Bradley Sielaff. Bruce B��dow, Maynard Nielsen. Alex Barna, Wa)t Starwalt P�embers Absent: Others Present: Of Da1e Thompson, 61en Douglas M�yra Gibson, Energy Aide Susan Merriam. P)anning qide - --. ���.+, cntn�r 6UITIISSIOPI MINUTES: M07ION by Mr. Bondow, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the February 26, 1985, Energy Commission minutes as written. UPON A YOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE. CHAIRPERSON SABA DECLARED THE M07ION CARRIED UNANIFpUSLY. 1. INTRnrnirrmu �� t.,� .._.. .___ Maynard Nielsen, A1ex Barna and Walt Starwatt were introduced as the new members of the Energy Project Cortmittee, and Lavonn Cooper was introduced as the secretary, Mr. Saba gave a brief overview of the Energy Cortmission and the reasons for forming the Energy Project Committee. He also ind4cated that the Comnittee woutd be in effect throughout the proposed energy program. DISCUSSION OF D.E.E.D. GRANT APPLICATION: Ms. Merriam indicated that the grant application contained a number of items and the City may not be able to accomplish everything. Priorities will be established and as may items as feasible wi11 be implemented. Ms. 6ibson distributed copies of the bud9et and flow chart for the Fridley Residential Energy Conservation Project (FRECP). The primary goal in the first year is the House Doctor program which is for lo�v to moderate income households. These persons apply for weatherization aid which is given on the basis of income. A contractor then audits the home and adds caulk, weather- stripping, insulation, etc. to meet a specified standard. This is done free of charge to qualified homeowners. Minnegasco provides fu�ding for these visits and the cost per home is approximately 5450. My money remaining from the total funding from Minnegasco would be used to cover administrative costs. ENERGY PROJECT COMJ�ITTEE MEETING APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 2 Ms. Gibson indicated that the Neighborhood Energy Norkshops (NEW) would be the second priority. She felt ft wise to have the first program working smooth]y defore implementing a second program. The NEW's require staff and training in order to conduct the workshops. Mr. Merriam indicated that the staff at the City of Minneapolis had shown an interest in training or assisting Fridley in conducting their NEW's, but this has not been specificaliy Qefined. She aiso indicated that Richfield had a 1ow parttcipation rate in both their ME►%'s and House Doctor programs; Khich was partfally due to the method of publicizing the programs. In order ta increase participation, Mr. Bondow recortmended first outlining the requirements so that qualified persons apply and then verifying the information just before final approval. Ms. Merriam recommended that the NEW's be conducted similar to those in the City of Minrteapo7is usirtq designated areas and involving the Block Captains that were also invo)ved�in the curbside recycling program. Mr. Saba felt that it would be difficult to get active participation from the Block Captains. 7he idea may work however if we11 publicized �nd positively approached. M,s. Merriam indicated that Hastings, Minneapolis, Blaine and Motindsview have siaff to conduct their own NEW's; however� in Frid]ey, the House Doctor program would come first. Mr. Saba asked if the House Doctor audit would affect the MECS audit done by Minnegasco and NSP. Ms. Me�riam agreed to check into this further. Ms. Gibson indicated that the NEW has a workshop during the week and one on Saturday while the Nouse Doctor has only one workshop. The audit is simiiar in both cases. At the seminar, those attending would be asked to provide some information about the dwelling before the initial visit so that Lhe person doing the House Doctor would have some inforniation beforehand. Topits to be covered at the workshop include appliance efficiency, reduction in energy use, and eoergy awareness. The House Doctor seminar may be combined with the first NEW. M►'. Saba questioned the availability of CD66 funds for the program and requested that a representative from the Anoka County Corrmunity Action Program (ACCAP) aitend a future meeting to provide information on what they have done in the City of Fridley. Mr. Bondow also requested to know how much money ACCAP spent per house in the City of Fridley. Ms. Merriam indicated that a part of the grant includes the coliection of data on what programs are aTready available to homeowners ir� Fridley. She also indicated that CDBG funds are turned over to ACCAP for.weatherization and rehab. Ms. Merriam agreed to bring to the next meeting the ACCAP monthly report as submitted to the City Council and to contact ACCAP to obtain the requested infornwtion. ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING APRII 2 1965 PAGE 3 Ms. Merrian indicated that the Fridley Energy Program would include sint�le family dwellings and aoartment building with 5 or more units to be assisted in bringing up to the 1985 standards. Dwellings with 2-4 units are not included. Mr: Saba requested that the rental properties that do not meet the 1985 standards be identified. Ms. Merriam indicated that this would be difficult without sufficient staff. The House Doctor and NEW programs will work with the larger units. However, a proDlem exists in identifying 2-4 unit buildings needing to be brought up to code. The House Doctor and NEW programs are geared toward low to moderate income households, and it is difficult for sane owners of 2-4 unit buildings to qualify under these income guidelines. Mr. Nielsen stated that Columbia Neights has a program to identify these buildings and that he would bring infortnation on that program to the next meettng. Ms. Gibson indicated that Minneapolis has a pilot program involving rental units. Aga�n, a problem exists because the owner must fit into the income guidelines. This program will be monitored for about one year to see how it progresses before being implemented by the City of Fridley. Ms. Merriam indicated that they had been advised not to start the House Doctor program in the real low income areas. The reason behind this is that experience is needed in addressing the "no►mal" problems before addressing those areas having more than just energy problems. For this reason, Ms. Gibson indicated that they would work more toward the rtroderate income group first or those people who do not qualify for other programs. Areas being considered first are the Hyde Park area and the central core area. These areas have a large number of single family hnmes and a large percentage of residents below the median income. Mr. SaDa stressed the importance of having a reliable contractor doing the work in the House Doctor program. Ms. Merriam stated that Minnegasco actually chooses the contractor who will do the work. Ms. Merriam indicated that volunteer time would be needed to assist in the NEW's and in the education portion of tfie House Doctor yrogram. 6eneraily, a workshop has three stations with a person present to provide information and to answer questions about energy conservatian. Mr. Saba recoim�ended the development of a video for each station to provide an explanation of what was being done and then having a person present to answer questions. In this manner all points would be consistently covered, persons attending could ask questions, and less time would be required for training. He suggested that someone currently giving the presentation be filmed and a video be developed. Ms. Merriam will contact the local cable TV Lo see if they would De willing to assist in such a project. Ms. Merriam indicated that, at this time, the grant had received initial approval and had been forwarded for final approval. The City should receive a decision on the grant lvithin the next couple of weeks. ENER6Y PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETIN6, APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 4 3. DTHER BUSINESS: a. Bikeway/Walkway Study Mr. Saba referred to the February 26, 1985, minutes regarding the bikeway/ waTkway study and the money available from Amoco. R1s. Merriam indicated that the D.E.E.D. grant includes funds from Amoco. Mr. Saba suggested that, in addition to the bikeway/walkway study, the City could do additional things to promote bike safety including better identification of bikeways which could be accomplished by putting up signs, adding bike racks to reduce the possibility of theft, and perhaps a promotional gimmick such as naming the 6ikeways. Mr. Barna indicated that the City does have a plan, but has not been able to implement it due to a lack of funding. b. Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development Letter Ms. Merriam distributed a copy of a letter received at the end of Dtarch from the Minnesota Department of Energy and fconomir Development regarding several financing programs to assist businesses in promoting energy projects. Ms. Merriam contacted Mr. Chodacki at FMC to let them know about the program. 7he committee suggested contacting Medtronic and Onan and other comnercial firms. Ms. Merriam asked the committee to review the information and that this would be included as an agenda item for the next meeting. Mr. Saba also indicated that the cortanittee would like more information on what FMC has done in the past several years in the area of energy conservation. Ms. Merriam agreed to contact Mr. Chodacki for an update. ADJOURNMEP�T: MOTIOP� by Mr. Bondow, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Saba declared the April 2, 1985, Energy Project Cortmittee adjourned at 9:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lavo�{i�i1/!t/ // e_r_i� Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIDN KEEIING APRIL 4, 1985 GAIL TO ORDER: Chairperson Mintpn called the April 4, 1985, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at J:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: Menbers Present: Bob Minton� Harold Belgum, Sue �herek Menbers Absent: Barbara Kocher Others Present: Bill Nunt, Adninistrative Assistant Tim Turnbull, Fridley Police DeAartment INTRODUCiIOTJ OF NEW COMMISSION FIETIBER: 5UE SHEREK Mr. Minton introduced Ms. Sherek . to tfie Comnission members and asked her to tell a little about herself, � Ms. Sherek stated she was a fairly new resident of Fridley. She was married to a Minneaooils school teacfier and Fias two young daughers, aged 2 and 5. She stated she worked for the Internal Revenue Service as a Computer Specialist. She has worked for the IRS for 12 years and included in her duties in the �est, but not presently, was membership on the Equal Emoloyment Opportunity (EEO) Comnission and Cormission for Women. Part of her responsibilities for two years was drafting the EEO Plan for the Internal Revenue Service of Minnesota, so she has had a little background in EEO. She stated she has been looking for some time of some way of getting involved, because the key thing she thought about living in a smaller cormunity, compared to the City of Minneapols, was the ability to get involved wi.thout actually getting politically involved. APPROVAL OF MARCH 7, 1985, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIOW MINUTES: MO:ZON BY MR. BEL6UM, SECONDED BY XS. ShetBk , TO APPROVE SHE MARCH 7, 1985, HUl2AN RESOURCES COMMZSISON MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A V07CE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRP£RSON MINTON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY, APPROVAL OF AGENDA: � M0='ZON BY flR. BELGUM, SECONDED BY MS, Sherek, TD RPPROVE THE AGENDA �I.S WRZTTEN. IIPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHhIRPERSOA'IfINR�N DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANZMOUSLY. HUHAN RE$OURCES GOMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 4, 1985 PAGE 2 1. OLD BUSINESS: a, Consideration of Disaster Preparedness Mr. Turnbull stated the Commission members had received a copy of a memo from Mr. Hill, Publio Safety Director, to Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, dated March 27, 1985, which referred to a radio activation system whicfi the City Council has approved for furtding and which they intend to implement in the City. Mr, Minton stated the Commission's main concern was that the equipment be of such a nature that a11 peapie can be warned adequately of any kind of disaster, whether naturat or manmade. They were kind of interested in a voice system that would warn people of what was going on, if that was economically feasible. Mr, Turnbull stated he wou]d give an overview of the approach the City was taking and the system they are looking at. Currently, in the City of Fridley, they have a standard syst�n that is in use throughout the seven- county metropoliian area--a system whereby eight sirens prrovide 100% coverage for outdoor warning are activated by land 7ine or telephone line system, There have been a significant number of problems over the last 2-3 years with this system, and those particular problems have basically centered around the system not going off wfien it was supposed to qo off to warn people and the system going off when there was no reason for it to go off. Mr, Turnbull stated there are three warning points in the metropoTitan area-- the 5tate Capitol, the State Highway Patrol, and the National '�eather 5ervice, The National Weather Service has been asked to get out of the warning busir�ess. Fridley is the only area in the United States where the National Weather Service actually flips the switch that turns on the sirens. The National Weather Service's purpose is to ti+arn communities about the weather, i.e „ give warning information and then have someone make the determination when to thraw the switch to activate the warning systems. Mr. Turnbull stated there were a variety of technical reasons why the system has haG problems. For example, if there is a strong wind and the telephone lines are down, then the signal that goes to the siren cannot get there. There has been a significant concern on the part of people in the metropolitan area that the telephone comaany is not maintai�ing land lines at the level needed to be maintained, Part of the reason was that Northwestern Bell was unable to assess an adequate charge to make a profit to maintain the system. Unfortunately, they have chose� to maintain a minimal level of maintenance. Mr. Turnbull stated that because the system is getting older. the lack of maintenance is beginning to take its toll, Along with that particular problem is the power line probiem in that the siren system is powered by power lines. If the power 7ines are down, there is no power to the sirens, so even if the circuit from the telephone line gets there, there is no power to actually make the siren work. HUHAN RESOURCES CDMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 4, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Turnbull stated they are looking at a two-phase project: Phase 1- To eliminate the failures due to telephone lines or �Tie Td lines, and they have applied for and received a federal grant, have now asked the City Council for matching funds, and have convinced the County to put in some funding for this project. They will locate at the County the central end coding equipment and the radio transmitter to send a signal to each of the eight siren sites in Fridley. There will be a radio on the pole that will receive tfie signal and tell the siren to turn on. This wi11 have a battery back-up so t�ey are avoiding the problem of the land line and the probtem of the power. Implementation of this phase will be soon, and they hope to have the radio control telemetry completed by fall. Phase 2� Basically determining what the reQlacement costs are for e mec nical sirens and replacing those with electronic. Implementation of this phase is yet to be clarified, Mr. Turnbull stated they have been working with a metropolitan-wide groua of emergency managers and the National Weather Service and, through this group, have secured cooperation from the National Weather Service so they wilt be sending out information about severe weather or hazardous materials or manmade disasters over the National Weather 5ervice emergency radio, Through a campaign of public awareness, they will try to promote peop7e to purchase these radios and maintain them in their homes. These are tone- activated radios so when there is an emergency, that signal will be sent out over the radio at-the same time the signal is sent out to the County to set tfie sirens off, People will know why the sirens are going off by having some detailed information and can supplement that information with TU and radio. b, Consideration of Pedestriao Safety on Main Thoroughfares Mr. Minton stated there has been d great deal of concern about the safety of pedestrians crossing Highway 65 and Highw�y 47, especially at the main intersections, and especially since a 10-year old boy was killed last November. Mr. Hunt stated that at the last meeting, the Commissioners had agreed they would like him to request data from the State on the number of pedestrian accidents at the different street intersections in Fridley over the last ten years. Mr. Hunt stated he did get in touch with someone from the State and was able to obtain data for nine years, 1976-1979 and 1980-1984. He stated that the worst number of accidents occurred at Mississippi and Highway 47. Mr. Turnbull stated there are a lot of factors that enter into pedestrian accidents, car/bicyle accidents and vehicle/vehicle accidents. One of the factors they have to look at and what the State continualty looks at is HU11AN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING; APRIC 4, 1985 PAC,E 4 some type of comparison with the number of accidents that happen and the amount of traffic that flows on that road. For example, he had some traffic flow information in his office comparing the 1981 figures and the ]984 figures {two most recent years traffic flow studies have been done 6y the State), and there has been a slight increase in the amount of traffic, roughly about 5%. He stated there are just short of 40,000 vehictes traveling north and south on Highway 47 in a day. In lookinq at the data t6e State had done on pedestrian accidents and seeing that the most serious area was Mississippi/Higfiway 47 with five accidents over a nine year period of time with approximately 35,000-40.00D vehicles going tfirougfi that intersectibn every dav, the State may say that the accident ratio was within reasonab7e and acceptable limits. However, if one life is lost in that period of t1me, tfie City of fridley may say that it is not acceptable. Mr. Minton stated the State has promised to do a traffic study this spring, and this study wil] be presented at a public hearing if the City asks them to. He stated that tf there was something appropriate at that time, the Cortmission could take some action. Mr. Turnbull stated there were no easy answers to solving the pedestrian crossi�g problem. If they change the signalling devices in order to a17ow the pedestrians and bicylists a more adequate amount of time to get across, rather than being able to only make it to the center island, this wouTd have a significant impact on the flow of traffic. They would see some back-up problems and that would have an affect on what was happening at 61st Avenue or farther north. So, there were a lot of things that had to be considered. He would guess that the State of Minnesota, when they do the traffic study, should be able to provide the City with the most updated information, He stated he felt the public hearing would be the ideal time for the Commission to express their concerns. Mr. Minton asked Mr. Hunt that if he received any more information regard- ing the study or the public hearing to please bring this to the Commission's attention. Mr. Belgum stated he appreciated very much the data Mr. Hunt had obtained from the State on pedestrian accidents, Mr. Turnbull stated the Fridley Police Dept. has always felt one of the major contributing factors to accidents is alcohol. Another major contri- buting factor is the weath2r. He stated he has been involved with alcohol- related enforcenent for seven years. Fifty percent of all the accidents in the City and State and country are alcohol-related. Tha City has taken a hard stance against the drinking driver because of the City's unique traffic problem and tremendous traffic volume. He stated he felt the City has probably otte of the leading efforts in the area of DWI enforcement and is one of the leading public educators of any city in tfie country. They have joined with Blaine and Coon Raoids in this enforcement. Fridley is con- sidered the model project and city for DWI enforcement and Fridle,y piloted and pioneered the DWI safety checkpoints. HUHAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETINC, APRIL 4, 7985 PAGE 5 Mr. Belgum stated this was information that should be qotten out to the public. He recommended the Potice Dept, consider having this type of information done in a series on public television. Mr. Turnbull stated he would take a strong cue from this recomnendation and work in that direction. c. Consideration of Grants to Human Services Organizations from CDBG Funds (1) 1983 Mr. Hunt stated that as discussed at the last meeting, the fridley Senior Drop-in Center had returned the $4,150 to the City as they were una6le to get their transportatton prrogram off the ground, The Cortmissioners had to decide how they would like to redistribute this money as long as tbe money was spent before Aug. 21, 1885, Ne had told the Cor,mission that the Fridley Senior Drop-in Center would be resubmitting a proposal for that amount, The Comnissioners 6ad agreed to wait for the proposal from the Fridley Senior Droo-in Center. Mr. Hunt stated the question before tf�e Commission was whether or not they wanted to recommend to the City Council that the same amount of money be given to the Fridley Senior Drop-in Center for "supplies". He stated tF�e items listed were legi±imate for CDBG funds. MOTION BY MS. Sherek, SECONDED BY MR, BELGUM, TO RF.COMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL TXAT THE 1983 CDBG FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF 54,150 BE REALLOCATED TO THE FRIDLEY SENZOR DROP-IN CENTER FOIt THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED, UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON MZNmON DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. (2) 1984 Mr. Hunt stated that as discussed at the last meeting, the 1984 funds allocated to The Alexandra House {$3,200 for the construction of a parking lot) did not qualify for CDBf funding under human services. The Alexandra House has also resubmitted a fundinq request for $3,200 to 6e used for insulation and paint. He stated this was appropriate for funding, MOTION BY MS. Sherek,, SECONDED BY MR. BELGUM, TO RECOMMEND TO �Y'-COQNCSL THAT TEtE 29$Q CDBG FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF 53,200 BE REALIACATED TO THE ALEXANDRA NOUSE FOR THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYF.� °""""•, """27ED UNANIMOUSLY. CXAIRPERSON MINTON DECLARED THE __. ___ _ HUt1AN RESOURCES COFiMISSIOF! MEETIF�G, APRIL 4, 1985 PA6E 6 Mr. Hunt stated the Anoka County Cortmunity Action Program (CAP) has a Senior Outreach Progran, and their funding period runs from Sept. through May--four months in 1985 and five months in 1986. They had asked for funding in the amount of $6,729 which was allocated to them. Regulations dictate that the 1984 CDBG program funds need to be expended by Dec. 31, 1985, so 5/9 of tf�eir grant is outside that fund le period. So, Anoka County CAP cut their funding back to the fo��ntfis from Sept, 1, 1985, to Dec. 31, 1985, and are asking for g2,720 instead of $6,129. Mr. Hunt stated this left $3,409 now unallocated. One possibility would 6e to fully fund tfiose organizations wfio made requests (Family Life Mental Hea]th Center and North Su6ur6an Family Service Center) but were not fully funded (excluding S.O.R.T, and Anoka County Volunteer Alliance) totalling $3,040, leavinq only 5369 remaining. Mr. Minton stated that based on his recoTiection of ail the organi- zations, he was impressed with all of them and would recommend the Commission recomnend the reallocation of funds as suggested by Staff, MOTION BY MR. BELGUM� SECONDED BY MS. Sherek, ., TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCZL TXAT 1984 CDBG FUNDS TOTALLING 53�090 BE REALLOCATED AS FOLZ,OWS: -� NpRTH SUBURBAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER -$2,040 FAMILY LZFE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER - 2,000 $3,040 UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON MZNTON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Mr. Hunt stated he would draft a 7etter to the City Council with a courtesy copy to the Planning Commissiop. (3) 1985 Mr. Hunt stated he had gotten announcer�ents in the local media about the 1985 CDBG funds and had mailed information out to all the organi- zations who have requested funding and have been funded in the past few years. He stated the deadline for applications was April 18, Ne stated this would give the Comnission two weeks to review the applications. At tfie May meeting, tf�e Commissioners can discuss the applicatibns and set a time to have the organizations make presentations to the Comrnission, Mr. Hunt stated that at this meeting, the Commissioners should review the funding guidelines and make any necessary changes, The Commissioners made a couple of changes to the score sheet. Ms. Sherrick stated she had read in previous minutes that the Commission should have more definite reasons for why they scored an organization HUHAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 4, 1985 PAGE 7 a certain way. She suggested the score sheet be redrafted,perhaps into two pages, leaving enough room for cortments, and then attach a score sheet to each grant application, Mr. Belgum and Mr. Minton stated this was an excellent idea. d, Consideration of Matters Related to Ethnic Background of fridley Residents Mr. Belgum stated that at the last meeting, he had told the Commissioners about the interview series of people with interesting ethnic backqrounds in Fridley that was done by students of an anthropology class at Anoka Ramsey Community College. This was done to help tfie promotion of Fridley Ethnic Days. Tfie Fridley Rotary Club contributed to printing and mailings. Mr. Belgum stated he had invited Terrv Reuther, who was the head of this study, to attend the Commission meeting, but apparently Mr. Reuther was unable to make it. He stated Terry Reuther holds an MS Degree from Purdue University and a BA from the University of Washington. He is an Adjunct Professor in the Extension Division of tfie College of St. Francis, Peoria, Illinois. He is also on the Facuity of Anoka-Ramsey Comnunity College. He fias participated in several community studies: Poverty in Montgover Co. Indiana, Recreational Use and Needs in Moundsview, and the Effect of Realtors on Residential Patterns in Lafayette, Ind. Mr. Belgum stated he would like to invite Mr, Reuther to attend the July meeting, Mr. Belgum stated 1986 will be the rededication of the Statue of Liberty. He knows someone on the National C�mmittee and the National Cor,mittee is looking for interesting ways to dramatize the ethnic mix that has come under tfie gaze of the Statue of Liberty over the last 100 ,years. He stated this was a good reason for the Commission to consider doing something interesting. The fact that tfie City has had an Ethnic Days for the last five years gave them a special occasion for it. 2. NEIJ BUSINESS: a. Consideration of Recognition of Volunteers for the City of Fridley Mr. Hunt stated that since time was getting short and April 22-28 was National Vo7unteer Week, he had one of the City's interns nut toqether a"Volunteer Thank-You Card". These would be sent out to volunteers of the City of fridley, b. Consideration of Issues Relating to the Legality of Sexual Conduct between Consenting Adults MOPION BY MS. Sh�rek _� SECONDED BY MR, BELGUM, TO DELETE THZS ZTEM FROM THE WORK PLAN SINCE THE COMMISSIONER WNO HAD INITIRTED TI175 ITEM WRS NO IANGER WITH THE COMMISSIDN. HUPIAN RESOURCES COMMISSIO�! MEETING, APRIL 4, 1985 PA6E 8 UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPER50N MINTON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . c. Consideration of the Use of Data involving People in the City of Fridley Mr. Hunt suggested they invite Sid Inman, Director of Central Services, to present an overview of the kind of data the City does have on individuals in tf�e City, what tfiey are planning to have in the near future, what kind of securities there are, and then the Comnission could discuss with Mr. Inman some of their concerns. The Comnissioners agreed to invite Mr. Inman to the May meeting. d. Consideration of Public Information about No-Fauit Grievance Comnittee Mr. Hunt stated this was an action item in the work plan. He stated he would contact Peter Treuenfels to see what kind of news releases could be prepared to acquaint tfie pu6lic with the concept and operations of the No-Fault Grievance Committee. Mr. Belgum suggested that messages be given to welfare clients that this ser•:ice is available. Ms. Sherek suggested some oti�er ways to get the information out miqht be through employee newsletters or employee bulletin boards of companies in Fridley, automobile dealers, Unity Hospital, etc. 3. NEY,T MEETING DATE: The Canmissioners agreed to change the meeting time from 7:00 p.m. back to 7:30 p.m. Next meeting date: Thursday, May 2, at 7:30 p.m, ADJOURNMENT: MOTZC:.' BY MR. BELGUM� SECONDED BY MS, �EREK � TO AATOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE�ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON�MZNTON DECLARED THE APRIL 4� 2985� HUMAN RE50URCES COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ynne a a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COhA1IS5I0N MEETING APRIL 9, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Oquist called the April 9, 1985, Comnunity Development Comnission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent: Others Present: LeRoy Oquist, A1 Gabel, Gene Rezac, Louis Schmidt, Ken Vos None Glenn Baron, Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. Mark Burch, Asst. Public Works Director APPROVAL OF JANUARY 8, 1985, COMt4UNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. 6ABEL, SECONbED BY DR. VOS, TO APPRaVE THE JANUARY 8, 1985, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V07ING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED 7HE M07ION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. DISCUSSION OF BLUE BELL ICE CREAM REQUEST Mr. Glenn Baron, President of Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc., attended the meeting to discuss the noise ordinance in Fridley. B]ue 8e1] Ice Cream `..rucks have operated in the City of Fridley for two years without know- ledge of the ordinance. Mr. Baron was infornied by a police officer that the ordinance is generally ignored. Mr. Baron indicated that he would ]ike to see the ordirrence amended to allow vendors call attention to themselves. The 81ue Bell Ice Cream company operates in surrounding communities, and the Cities of Richfield and St. Louis Park have amended their ordinances to allow the use of a manually operated bell to let residents know that they are in their neighborhoods. These citres have also stated that tt�e operation is concerned about safety. The Comnittee discussed with Mr. Baron the hours of operation, potential safety hazards, restrictions on areas in which vendors may sell, and the possibility of a variance or special use permit to allow vendors to continue •to sell unti] the ordinance receives final approval by the City Council. MOTION BY DR. VOS, SECONDED BY LOUIS SCHMIDT, THAT THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND THE AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 124, NOISE, SEC7IOt� 124.07, SUSD. 4, "tJ0 PERSOtdS SHALL OPERATE OR PERFIIT THE USE OR OPERATION OF ANY LOUDSPEAKER, SOUtJD AMPLIFIER, OR OTHER DEVICE FOR THE PRODUCTION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND ON A STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE FOR THE PURP05E OF COMr4ERCIAL ADVERTISING OR ATTRACTIN6 THE ATTENTION OF THE PUBLIC TO ANY COPIMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT OR VEHICLE" AND CHAP7ER 14, PEDDLERS, SECTION 14.09, "LOUD NOISES AN� SPEAKIN6 DEYICES, NO PERMITTEE, NOR ANY PERSON IN HIS OR HER BEHALF, SHALL SHOU7, CRY OUT, BLOW A HCRN, RING A BELL, OR USE ANY SOUND AMPLIFYIN6 DEUICE" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1985 PAGE 2 TO REFLECT THE FOLLOWING: "EXCEPTION FOR f00D/BEVERAGE VEHICLES. NOTWITH- STANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION TO THE CONTRARY, FOOD/BEVERAGE YEHICLES MAY SOUND A MANUALLY OPERATED BELL BETWEEN NOON AND SUNSET DAILY WHICH PRODUCES A NOISE LEVEL MEASURED AT A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET FROM THE SOURCE NO GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWIN6: RESIDENTIAL/BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 65 DECIBELS WITH THE FOLLDWING RESTRICTIONS: A) VENDOR WILL NOT SELL ON MAJOR THOROUGH- FARES AS ['ISCUSSED WITH STAfF; AND B) VENDOR WILL NOT COMPETE WITH CONCESSIONS IN CITY PARKS. UPON VOiCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY DR. VOS, SECONDED BY GENE REZAC, THAT THE COMMISSION RECOM�AEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION GRANTING AN EXCEPTIOP� TO THE CURRENT ORDINANCE SO THAT BLUE BELL ICE CREAM, INC., CAN OPERATE DURING THE CURRENT SEASON UNTIL THE ORDINANCE IS CHANGED. — UPON VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Chairperson Oquist then infornied Mr. Baron that this recorrmendation would next go to the Planning Commission and be discussed at their April 17th meeting. Mr. Burch agreed to contact Mr. Baron to let him know what action is teken at the Planning Commission meeting. 2. DEVELOP WORKPLAN FOR 1985 Chairperson Oquist indicated that he would like the City Council to state the role of the commission. The commission also needs to look at where they are going and what the commission does. He also requested a review of the sign ��rdinance due to the frequent requests for variance. This topic would also include the Chamber of Commerce. Dr. Vos stated there should be more focus put on getting involved with the Chamber of Commerce. He also indicated that some of the items on the workplan needed to be done on an annual basis. Chairperson Oquist requested that the Workplan be continued to the next meeting, and requested Mr. Burch to be sure that all conanission members had a copy of the 1984 Workplan to review prior to the next meeting. 3. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBILITY OF CITY PROMOTED ARBOR DAY ACTIUITIES FOR 1985 Mr. Burch suggested looking into promoting Arbor Day when trees are planted in the community. He indicated that this could become an annual event. Dr. Vos felt it was a good idea. The cost to the City would be nominal and a project could be promoted through volunteer, youth or other organizations. The commission felt this would be worth pursuing. COhH�1UNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIOH MEETING, APRIL 9, 1985 PAGE 3 4. ELEC7ION OF CHAIR AMD VICE CHAIR - MAY 1985 to MAY 1986 Chairperson Oquist explained the responsibilities of the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for the information of the new members. He then declared the nominations open for chairperson. Mr. Gabel nominated Mr. Oquist for Chairperson. Hearing no other nominations, Chairperson Oquist declared the nominations c)osed. MOTION BY MR. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. SCHMIDT, TO CAST A UNANIMOUS BALL07 FOR MR. OQUIST FOR CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN7 COMFIISSION FOR 1985-86. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Chairperson Oquist declared the nominations open for Yice-Chairperson. Mr. Schmidt nominated Mr. Gabel for Yice-Chairperson. Hearing no other nominations, Chairperson Oquist declared the nominatior�s c]osed. MOTION BY MR. SCHMIDT, SECONDED BY DR. VOS, TO CAST A UNANIMOUS BALLOT F R R. GABEL FOR VICE-CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMPIUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR 1985-86. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN6 AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. OTHER BUSINESS a. Snow Plowing Mr. Gabel told the commission that he had received a phone call which stemmed from complaints about the snow plowing of cul de sacs during the most recent snow storm. Mr. Burch reviewed the City's procedure for snow plowing. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. REZAC, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE Y�T , ALL VOTIP�G AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE APRIL 9, 1985, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN7 COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:58 P.M. Respectfully submitted, //� /.��'��� �����'�-� Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary CI7Y OF FRIDLEY -ARPEALS COMM�SSIO�d MEETIIJ6,-APRIL 9, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabel called the April 9, 1985, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:32 pm. ROLL CALL: Menbers Present: Pat Gabel, Alex Barna, Jean Gerou, Donald Betzold Menbers Absent: Jim Plemel Others Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley Michael Ivers, 830 Overton Dr. N.E. Rodnev D. Sykora, fMC Corporation Mike Kubacki, 6040 Stinson Blvd. N.E. APPROVAL OF MARCH 26, 1985, APPEALS COM�1ISSION MINUTES: MOmION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY F42, BARNA� TO APPROVE THE MARCX 26� I985, A�ALS COMMISSIDN MINUTES AS WRZTTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON CABEL DECLARED THE MOTIO21 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. REfIUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE D , 830 Dver�on rive .., r� ey, Mn. 55432) MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC NEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P,M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff ReDOrt: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 830 Overton Drive N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Sectio� 205.07.3D.2a requires a minimum side yard of 10 feet between anv living area and side property lines. APPEAIS COHMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1985 PAGE 2 Section 205.07.3D.26 requires a minimum side vard of 5 feet 6etween a attached accessory building or use and side propertv lines. Section 205.07.3D.3a requires a rear yard setback of not less than one fourth the lot depth, witfi not less than twenty-five {p5) feet permitted or more than forty (4�} feet required. Public pur�ose served by t�ese requirements is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between qarages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exnosure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "I have two cars. My exisitng garage is 20 ft. by 12 ft, on the inside and we can't get out of the car inside tfie garage, There is also no storage area. We would like a two-car garage. The family kitchen area is too small for a family of five; no cupboard space; and my wife is on me a17 the time to do something." C. ADHINIS7RATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Variance #1 - Tfie reduction froM 10 feet to 4 feet for living area. If the Board recommends apnrovel, the Staff has no sti�ulations to suqqest. Variance #2 - Reduction of garage side vard from 5 feet to 2 feet. Adjacent to this addition is the neiqhbor's driveway. The averaqe two car garage width is 22 feet; therefore, if the petitioner's measurements are correct, he could obtain a 22 foot garage and leave 3 feet between his garage addition and tfie assumed property line. The staff recommendation is that any approval should be contingent upon a new survey beinq made to determine the oroperty line and that the variance be a minimum of 2 feet, or to 3 feet if a 22 foot garage can be obtained at the 3 foot measurement. Uariance #3 - Reduction of the rear yard from 29 feet to 21 feet. We have had discussions with the petitioner on this and suggested he reduce hfs 20 ft. by 30 ft. addition to 16 ft. by 24 ft, in order to maintain a 25 foot rear yard. He feels that the 20 by 30 addition would better fit his needs. If the Board recommends approval of any rear yard variance, we do not have any stipulations to suggest. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING; APRIL 9, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Clark showed a picture of the residence taken from the street and an aerial photo showing the house in relation to the neighbor's house. One thing he would like to add to the Staff Report was that if the garage is to be built less tfian 3 feet from the lot line, that wall nearest the lot line should be a one-fiour rated fire wall. Mr. Ivers sfiowed his proposed plan to the Comnission. He stated the addition would be for a dining area, family room, and another upstairs bedroom for his son who presently sleeps 1r tfie 6asement. Ne stated he has talked to his neigfibors, and none of tfiem Fds any objection to this addition or garage. Mr. Clark stated that Mr. Rodger Westlund, the adjacent property owner at 830 Overton Drive, has signed a statement saying he did not object to the side yard variance for tfie attacfied garage from 5 ft. to 2 ft. or the side yard variance from 10 ft. to 9 ft, for living area. Ms. Gabel stated she couid see that the biggest problem came about because of the odd shape of tfie tot. MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MS. GEROU� TO CL0.SE THE PUBLZC HEARZNG. UpON A VOICE V02E, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARZNG CLOSED AT 7:98 P.M. Mr. Betzold stated he believed the reason for the third variance was because of the unusual shape of tfie lot, so f�e could see the hardship there. As far as the first two variances, his usual opposition was in building too close to lot lines. He noted that tlie petitioner's neighbor did have a double car garage already, and it was not very likely tfiat neighbor would seek to build any closer. Also, because of tf�e fact that Mr. Ivers' particular structure was far forward of wfiere the neighbor's garage was, he felt there was still adequate space between the two structures which he felt still m�intained the intent of the City Code. Mr. Barna stated he had no problem with these variances. They have had a few variances in this neighborhood, principally because this style of house did not allow enough space for a garage expansion without getting into the pie- shaped yard. Most of the yards on corner lots in this area are pie-shaped. He stated the rear yard setback variance was not the petitioner's fault. If the lot was square, there would be no need for a side yard variance for livinq area, 5ince the garage would be quite a bit in front of the neiqhbor's garage and as long as the side wall was a fire-rated wall, he would have no objection. Ms. Gerou stated this was unique in that this was an unusually shaped lot. She felt to add only a 16 ft. by 24 ft. addition would really defeat the purpose needed by the petitioner. Mr. Barna stated the fact that the petitioner needed a garage and another upstairs bedroom was the hardshin. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETINC,, APRIL 9, 1985 PAGE 4 MOTION BY MR, BAIWA� SECONDED BY MS. GEROU� TO APPROVE TNE REQUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT � CHAPTER 205 OF TNE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACX FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FROM THE REj)USRED 5 FEET TO 2 FEET WITX THE STIPULATION THAT THE VARIRNCE BE A MINIMUM OF 2 FEF.T OR 3� FEET IF A 22 FOOT GARAGE CAN BE OBTAINED AT THE 3 FODT MEASURE.MEl7T� RND T.YAT THE WESTERLY WALL BE A FIRE-RATED WALLj TO REDUCE THE SZD£ YRRD SETBACK FOR�LIVIN6 RRER FROM THE REQUIRED 10 FEET TO 9 PEET; AND TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE RELJlIZRED 29 FSET TO 21 FEET� ALL LOCATED ON IAT 3� BIACK 6� BROOKVIEW TERRACE THIRD ADDISION� THE SAME BE'ING B30 OVERTON DRIVE N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. 2, YARIANCE REOUEST PURSUANI TO CHAPTER 214 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOW i� u. �yKOra, rri� �orpurati�on, vauu tasc rciver noaa rv.t., rriaiey, �• MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU� TO OPEN THE PUBLZC HEIIRING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON GAHEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC XEARING OPEN AT 7:56 P.X. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 4800 East River Road N.E. A, pUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED SY REQUIREMEN7: Section 214.26 limits the maximum size of eighty (80) square feet in area for a free-standing sign. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and excessive use of signs in industrial areas. B. STATED HARDSNIP: "7his is a unique manufacturing facility; partly Navy-owned and operated, and partly fMC-owned and operated. The directional sign will clarify FMC ownership and safely direct southbound traffic to the proper entrance. This facility averages 120 visitors and 65 contractors per day using the designated entrance, exiting off a major road." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REUIEW: The existing sign is approximately 448 square feet in area and the sign is in good condition. The County Park system has purchased the land APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1985 PAf,E 5 the sign is located on and tfiey have asked FMC to reduce the size of the sign to 144 square feet. The County has no objection to having the sign located on their property. If the Board recommends approval on this request, the Staff has no stipulations to suggest. Mr. Clark stated that on one of the sign plans in the Commission`s agenda, in the upper right hand corner, Mr. Torkildson, Director of the Anoka County Parks & Recreation Department,had verified the fact that the County has requested the sign be replaced with a smaller sign. Mr. Sykora presented a letter to the Commission which was addressed to himself from the Anoka County Department of Parks & Recreation which stated that Anoka County has requested FMC to reduce the size of the informational sign located on Park property in the City of Fridley and has agreed with FMC for a sign approximately 12 ft, by 12 ft, being placed in a similar location for directional information only. The County was requesting this sign be replaced by the end of April 1985 or at least the existing sign be removed by that time. MOTION BY MS. GEROU, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO RECEIVE TNE LETTEX INTO THE RECORD. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANI.►.'OUSLY. Mr. Sykora showed the Commissioners a photograph of the existing sign located on Anoka County property. He stated there are five entrances into FMC, and this sign is the only sign for southbound traffic. The only other sign in the area or across from East River Road from that is a large 30 ft. by 30 ft, sign that indicates that FMC is navy-owned, so people coming south, about 200 vehicles a day, have no indication that this is the main gate for them to enter so there is the potential safety hazard of peonle going too far or slowing down and not being sure of the right entrance. Ms. Gabel stated it has been her position that any time they can reduce a large sign as significantly as this, they are headed in the right direction. MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BE220LD� Tp CIASE THE PUBLIC XEARING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARZNG CZASED AT 8:04 P.M. Ms. Gerou stated she had no problem with this variance. The sign was being reduced to about 1/3 of the existing sign. Mr. Betzold stated he felt a directional sign at this particular location was needed, because there are so many entrances. He had no objection to the variance. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1985 PA6E 6 Ms. Gabel stated this sign is a necessary sign, and the reduction in size was very desirab]e, She had no objection to the variance. MOTZO.Y BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO RECOMMEND SO CITY COi�NCIL APPF20VAL OF A VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 214 OF TH� FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO RLLOW A FREE-STANDING SIGN TO BE INCREAS$D FROM THS MAXIMUM OF 80 SQUARE�FEET TO 144 SQUARE FEET THAT WILL BE IACATED ON COUNTY PARK PROPERTY ON IAT 23� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 79� ACROSS FROM 4800 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E, UPON A VOICE VOSE, GABEL� GEROJ, AND BETZOLD VOTZNG AYE, BARNA ABSTAINID�G� CHRIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Gabel stated this item would go to City Council on May 6, 3, VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHA.PTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE .G T�ACT6YT�T . , , , S eques y .. u ac i, inson v. .., ri ey, n. 55432), MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BRRNA� TO OPEN TNE PUBLIC HEARING. UPONR VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAZRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN RT 8:08 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative 5taff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAfF REPORT 6040 Stinson Boulevard N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205,07.3D.2a requires a minimum of 10 foot side yard setback between living areas and any side pro�erty line. public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Need extra space (width) to allow for easy passage through to the outside area and to make room wide enough for normal use." APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1985 PAGE 7 C, ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The house ta the south of the petitioner's house is 17 feet from the common property line. Therefore, there would be 24 feet between living areas if the variance is granted. The staff has no stipulations to suggest if the Board recommends approval. Mr.Clark stated that on the last page of the Commission's agenda was a letter from the neighbor to the south, Tom Haley, 6030 Stinson Blvd., stating he had no objection to Mr. Kubacki's plans. MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO RECEZVE TXE LETTER DATED MARCH 21� 1985� FROM TOM AALEY, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRZED UNANZMClUSLY. Mr. Kubacki showed the Commission the plans for the addition. He stated that when they originally built the house, they had wanted a family room; but for financial reasons, they did not add the family room on at that time. Their family has now increased, and they wou7d like to add the family room on, The minimum fie could build was 8; ft., but fin order to make room for adequate passage into the house, a closet area, and mud room area, the extra 3z ft. would make a real functional room. He stated he also hopes to gain some solar heat from tf�e soutf�ern exposure. Mr. Kubacki stated that because of poor soil in the area, this area of the lot was the only part that was really buildable. That was why the house was located close to the southerly lot line and was not ce�tered on the lot. MOTION BY MS, GEROU� SECONDED BY MK, BARNA� TO CIASE THE PUALIC HEARZNG. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON 6ABEL DECLARED TXE P(IBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. Mr. Betzold stated there would still be 24 ft, between this house and the neighbor's house, and the overall structure was not being moved any closer, just extending the line, although this will be livinq area as oaposed to garage area, The petitioner would not have had this problem if the house could have been built more in the center of the lot. He thought a variance was appropriate in this case. Mr. Barna stated he had no problem with the variance. The living area would sti11 be 1; ft. away from the neighbor's house than the garage is now. He could see the need for additional living space. The placement of the house on tf�e lot was basically the reason for tf�e variance; it was nothing caused by the petitioner himself, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 9, 1985 PA6E 8 Ms. Gerou stated that because af the uniqueness of the lot, the placement of the house on the lot, and the fact that the line was just beina extended, she would be in favor of the varianc2. Ms, Gabel agreed with what the other Comnissioners had said, MOTZON BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO APPROVE SHE VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHApTER 205 OF TNE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REbUCE TXE SIDE YARD SE:BACK FOR LIVING ARF,A FROM THE REQUIRED 10 fiEET TO 7 FEET TO ALLOW A S2 FT. BY 12 FT. ADDITION BEHIND THE GARAGE ON LOT 3, BLOCK 1� AMBER OAKS� THE SA14E BEING 6040 STINSON BLVD, N.E. UPON A VOICF VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRPERSON GABEL DECLARED SHE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY, ADJOURNMENT: �MOTION BY Iqt, BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO ADJOURN THE--MEETING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE APRIL 9� 1985� APPEALS C014MISSION MEETING AWOURNED AT 8:25 P.M, Res ectfully subm,itted, � G^� xC � � yn ig a a Recording 5ecretary CITY OF FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 16, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Nielsen called the April 16, 1985, Environmental Quality Cortmission meeting to order at 7:48 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Maynard Nielsen, Tom 6ronlund, Bruce Peterson Richard Svanda, Wayne Wellan Susan Merriam, Planning Aide APPROVAL OF MARCH 26, 1985, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Gronlund, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to approve the March 26, 1985, n� vironmental Quality Comnission minutes as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Nielsen declared the motion carried unanirtwusly. DISCUSSION ON THE PROGRESS OF THE FRIDLEY CURBSIDE RECYCLIPJG PROGRAM Ms. Merriam indicated that she had attended the Anoka County Board of Comnissioners meeting held April �5, 1985, and that the Board had approved a funding level of $1.25 per household or $13,149. The funds will be allocated during the year, perhaps in October, with restrictions on how the funds may be spent. A workplan will be submitted by October 10, 1985. These funds may not be recurring because the Board feels that the Anoka County Landfill will close in 1986, and the funds are available through the landfill surcharge. Ms. Merriam indicated that CDBG funds could be used for the recycling program, but those funds could also be cut. She felt it important to consider ways to provide future funding for the recycling program. Mr. Peterson stated that, since the Metropolitan Council is considering making recycling mandatory, the Council would do something to prromote recycling programs. Ms. Merriam reviewed the Specifications, Contract and Bid Sheets for the program and the changes that had been made before it was sent out. Ms. Merriam indicated that the materiai had been sent to six potsntial bidders and would be advertised twice in the fridley Focus. Ms. Merriam said she would be contacting the MPCA to see if they had more names of interested parties, a;nd she will then forward copies of the specifications to those people. ENUIRONMEN7AL QUALITY C0�lMISSION MEE7ING APRIL 16 1985 PAGE 2 Referrin9 to page 21 of the specifications, Ms. Merriam indicated that the hauler would be required to submit a plan showing how they would figure the participation rate and how they would use that participation rate in figuring their base bid, reduced bid and no subsidy amount. In addition, Ms. Merriam stated that she was reviewing the refuse ordinance and the recycling ordinance which require changes to coincide with the recycling program. She felt the two ordinances would be combined into one ordinance to reduce redundancy. The proposed ordinance changes may go directly to the Planning Coimnission in order to get the ordinances amended more quickly. Mr. Peterson indicated the need for an educational program to get the recycling program going. The Jaycees could help with that process. Some items the Jaycees could help with include working with the BTock Captains to get more people participating and making signs. He agreed to speak with the Jaycees and see how they responded to the ideas. Ms. Merriam discussed publicity of the program with the co�nission, The recycling program is scheduied to begin in June. A publicity promotion will be done at that time and another promotion in September. Ms. Merriam presented a proposed article for the City Newsletter with questions and answers relating to the recycling pro9ram. She also indicated that she would like to include in an article information from Sandra 6ardebring, chairoerson of the Metropolitan Counci]. Mr. Gronlund noted that the City had stated in the specifications that they would develop and deliver the initial flyer on the recycling program. Ms. Merriam distributed samples of flyers from other municipalities for the commission members to review. The concensus was that a one-page flyer would be adequate to provide the needed information. Additional items that need to be coordinated for the week prior to the actual start-up of the recycling program include reserving the comnunity bulletin board, preparing an advertisement for the Fridley Focus, and 'advertising on Cable N. Mr. Nielsen suggested some type of publicity be included as a part of "49er Days" held in June and asked if the Jaycees would consider a project as part of the festivities. Ms. Merriam i•ndicated that some of these items would be scheduled once the bids are in and approved. At that time, a more specific start-up date for the recycling program can be established. ADJOURNMEN7: MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Gronlund, to adjourn the.meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Nielsen declared the April 16, 1485, Environmental Quality Commission meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Res,pectfully submitted, LaVOfifl (:0 P Y' / r . Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 23, 1985 GALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabel called the April 23, 1985, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:33 p,m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Meribers Absent Pat 6abe1, Alex Barna, Donald Betzold Jean Gerou, Jim Plemel Otliers Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley George and Karen Maas, 6880 Channel Rd, t�.E. David Byrne, 602� 4th St. N.E. John and Marshea Swingdorf, 90 Rice Creek Wav Rhoda M. Sprang, 4600 W. 77th St., Mpls. 55435 Robert and Marilyn Anderson, 6800 Oakley St. N.E. Charles Westling, 8403 Mississippi Blvd., Coon Rapids APpROVAL OF APRII 9, 1985, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO APPROVE THE APRIL 9� 1985� APPERLS COMMISSION MZNUTES AS WRITTEN, UPON A VOICE VOSE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIF,D UNANIMOUSLY. 1. VARIANCE REQUE57 PURSUA�JT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CIT� C�DE TO REDUCE S E AR SETB CK -0 G JER 0 _.. F , , � � �V Y IE J, E �B U�G 800 CHA7 equest y George J. Maas, 6880 C anne oa .., Fri ev, n. 32) MOTION BY !!R. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR, BARNA� TO OPEN THE PUBLZC HEARING. UPON R VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CXAZRPERSON 6ABEL DECLARED THF. Pi?BLIC --HEARING OPEN AT 7:34 P,M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6880 Channel Road N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.3D.2c.1 requires the side yard setback on a street side of a corner lot shall be not less than seventeen and one-fialf (17.5) feet. APPEALS C�IMISSIO�J MEETING, APRIC 23; 1985 PAGE 2 Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Have garage even with house on side street for privacy, looks, and noise. The boulevard is 17 feet wide ��ith two utility poles on it. There is no sfdewalk proposed. Mv property joins two commercial properties, 6876 Channel Road and 6881 Highway #65, both of which have had variances to go closer to the property lines." C, ADMINISTRA7IVE STAFF REVIEW: The only thing the Staff would ask the Board to consider is that the garage be p7aced 2o feet off the street right of way so as to provide space to nark a vehicle in front of the garage door without encroaching into the street right-of-way. Mr. Clark stated Mr. Maas has started preparing the ground for the construction of tfie garage, but he has prepared it in sucfi a way that the garage can be rraved north or south, wfiatever dimensions are ap;�roved by tfie Appeals Commission at this meeting. If Mr. Maas is granted a 17; ft. side yard setback, the garaqe will be in line with the house. If he is granted a 20 ft. side vard setback, the garage will be 2Z ft. to the nortfi of tfie location of the house. Mr. Maas stated the garage would look much nicer at 17y2 ft. as it would look like the garage was planned with the house, not as an afterthought. He stated that cars are getting smaller today than they used to be. He has one older car that is 19 ft. long whicfi would probably stay in the garage. He owns two smaller cars that measure only 15� ft.long. Since the idea was to keep the cars off the boulevard, the small cars would 6e off tfie boulevard. Mr. Maas stated the neighbor across the street at 6878 Channel Rd, has a variance which was a lot closer to the property line than what he was requesting. The boulevard was 17; ft. wide and the driveway was 34 ft, long. Even if a sidewalk was planned on the boulevard, there wouTd not be a car parked that close to it. Mr. Maas stated noise was another factor. When he moved in 20 years ago, Highway 65 did not have much traffic. Today the noise from the traffic was bad and was getting worse, Tfiis garage would cut down a lot on the noise and the security lights from the motel. Mr. Barna stated he fiad trouble with the stated hardship. The Cormiission needs a justifiable reason w�y the petitioner has to have a garage at 172 ft. rather than 20 ft. Mr. Maas stated he did not have much back yard now. The further they move the garage back, the closer it wil7 be to the neighbors. Also, he has planned a 10 ft.patio with a roof beyond the garage. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Betzold stated he was concerned about safety--the line of sight for cars coming around the corner, Mr. Maas had stated that cars were gettinq smaller, but he was not so sure about that. Mr, Betzold stated he has seen pick-un trucks and boats parked in driveways. The purpose of the 20 ft. is to move things away so cars coming around the corner can see the oncoming traffic. Mr. Maas stated he did not see the problem. The boulevard was 17; ft, which was room enough for a vehicle right there. There was no obstruction, other than the telephone pole, for traffic coming around the corner. The traffic does not travel too fast because thz street is only one half block long. Mr. Barna stated he had no problem with the line of sight and, aesthetically, the garage would look better in line with the house. His problem was still with the hardship as stated. Ms. Gabel stated that legally for the Appeals Commission to grant a variance the petitioner needs to demonstrate a hardship. If the lay of the land or the amount of land, or something like that, causes a unique hardship, then the hardship is demonstrated. The desire or wish to do something was different from a hardship. Mr. Maas stated the noise from the highway was tremendous and was getting worse The only way he can stop some of that noise was to put up a buildinq and a fence. His bedroom window was on the south, and there was a lot of traffic noise, especially in the sumnertime and on weekends. Mr, Barna suggested that the hardship could be that because the bedroom window is 4 ft, from the forward edge of the southerly end of the house, having the garage at 17� ft. would shield the sounds from Highway 65 better than it would if the garage was placed at 20 ft. MOTION BY MR. BRRNA� SECONDED BY MR, BETZOLD� TO CIASE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARZNG CLOSED AT 7;50 P,dt, Mr. Barna stated he would have no problem with the garage beinq lined up with the side of the house. If the garage was moved 2; ft. back as suggested by SLaff, it has been demonstrated that it would create a hardship as far as the master bedroom was concerned. There would still be 34 ft. from the front of the garage to the curb, and he knew there were a lot of side yards with 2-3 ft. boulevards that were only 18-19 ft. from the curb. He would be in favor of granting the variance. Mr. Betzold stated he was not in favor of granting the variance. He stated the hardship was entirely manufactured by the Commission, finding the 6ardship was not the role of the Commission. The Appeals Commission has a resoonsibility, and he did not see the hardship, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 23, 1985 PAfE 4 Ms. Gabel stated she, too, was not very clear on the hardship, She suspected the hardsfiip initialiy was that the petitioner needed a garage; however, the placement of the garage was somewhat in question. She did not have a specific problem with the garage being li.ned up witb t6e 6ouse as it might be desirable in terms of the neigh6orhood, and sfie certainly t6ought the boulevard was big enough�to sustain that. She could understand the need for the garage. Her concern was she did not think the fiardship was clear enough for her to vote in favor of the variance. Mr. Barna stated the Comnission has helped find hardships for many neople over the years, and whether they created the hardships or verbalized the hardships was imnaterial. He could visualize the hardship in this case as the olacement of the bedroom window. Ne stated some people have not had the kind of experience the Appeals Comnission has had in being able to verbalize their hardships. Mr. Betzoid stated he disagreed. He stated petitioners come to the hearings pretty regularly knowing exactty what the circumstances are and why they wanted something, and the Comnission has never had to stretch this far. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Clark that if this variance was denied, could the petitioner go the full 25 ft. back without needing a variance? Mr. Clark stated that at 20 ft., there would still be 26 ft. between the patio and the north property line, but it would put the garage right in the middle of the back yard. Mr. Betzold stated he wou]d still feel more comfortab7e going a7ong with the City's recommendation of 20 ft. rather than 172 ft. The city does want a little more distance between the street and the garage if possible, and he did not think 20 ft. was that much mare. MOTIQ"7 BY MR. BARNA TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST AS REQUESTED. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE SZDF. YARD�SETBACK ON A CORNER LOT FROM 25 FEET TO 20 FEET TO ALLOW TXE CONSTRUCTION OF R 22 FT. BY 24 FT. DETACXED GARRGE ON 7AT 4� BI,OCK 1� VALLEY VIEW MANOR� THE SAME BEZNG 6880 CHANNEL RORD N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE T0 NG tit1NG bUZU 41H SIKEEI fl.E. (Request by David i. Byrne, 6IIPD 4�h-�tree�—N.E., ey, n. , APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 5 MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY F¢t, BARNA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC NEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECTARED THE PUBLIC HE'ARING OPEN AT 7:58 P,M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6020 4tfi Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIRFTIENT: Section 205.07.7.B4.a restricts the size of an accessory building to not exceed 100% of the first floor area of tfie dwelling unit or a maximum of 1,000 square feet. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Room is needed and required for storage. Tf�e existing garage would be used for storage and a 6asic home workshoo or area. The new garage or proposed garage addition would be for the cars and a few specific items related to automobiles. Items to be stored include a canoe, bikes, ladders, snowmobile and trailer, snowblower, lawnmower, motorcycle, and home tools or shop items along with general items that can be stored." C. ADMINISTRATIVE S?AFF REVIEW: If the Board moves to approve this request, the Staff has no suggested stipulations. Mr, Clark showed the Corrmissioners an aerial photo of the oroperty and a Polaroid photo of the house. He stated the garage addition was to be placed in front of the existing garage and would be attached to the house with a 6reezeway. Mr. Byrne stated he moved into the house in October 1984, so he has endured one winter with the snow. He stated the street level is exactly one foot higher than the existing garage so all the run-off goes into his garage. That was one hardship. The other hardship was he has many material items that need to be stored so his yard does not look like a junkyard, He wants to start making improvenents to his property for safety and aesthetics for his family and himself and the neighborhood. He stated the existing garage would be used for storage and the proposed garage, 18 ft, by 24 ft. would be used for two vehicles. He stated he was in the carpenter trade and would like to use his tools to the best of his ability to improve his proeprty. There was no commercial use or business use intended. Mr. Betzold asked Mr. Byrne why he just didn't continue to use the existing garage as a garage and then add on to the house either to the north or to the west. Mr. Byrne stated he could add on to the house to the nnr±�, but he had no desire s�a�@. so. He wanted tc -._- .� �„„. __. _ APPEALS COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 23 1985 PAGE 6 Mr. Betzold stated there was a part in the city code passe� specifically to avoid what the petitioner was trying to do. He feit that because of the way the lot was structured, the petitioner had ample room to do what he was trying to do without a variance. Mr, Byrne stated what he was trying to do was tie all the buildings together. It is all laid out so that it will be aesthetically pleasing. There will be different roof lines. He was trying to create something that was aestheticaily pleasing, not only for himself, but also for the neighborhood. Mr. Barna stated he had not considered the possibility of building to the north. Why have to go to the northwest corner of the lot to dig out a snowblower or whatever when the driveway is on the northeast side? He wondered if the petitioner intended to keep the garage door in the existing garage in order to drive vehicles through from the new structure into the existing Qarage, Mr, Byrne stated he planned on having a 6 ft. x 6 ft. service door between the two structures. Mr, Barna stated the layout of the structure did look nice, As far as the size of the building, from the front, it was not going to look any bigger than a lot of larger homes in the area. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO CLOSE TXE PUBLZC NEARING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLSC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. Mr. Betzold stated that since this was a new code provision, he could see more requests coming in in the future from people wanting to build larger storage spaces, and the code simply does not allow it. The wisdom of the code was not the Comnission's province but findfng the hardship was. Mr. Barna stated they are going to start seeing a new society of people with smaller families requiring less living space but needinq larger storage space for recreational-type vehicles--trailers, boats, motorcycles, RV's. The code requires a garage for any new structure, but yet now they want to turn around and limit the size of the garage. Mavbe the Citv should be looking at whether the code should have been changed to just 1,000 square feet, rather than allowing something that was aesthetically designed with the house. He stated it was the Comnission's charge to see whether the code was viable in this particular instance, and he felt in this instance the variance should be granted and the structure should be allowed. Ms. Gabel stated she felt it was true that there are going to be smaller families and they are guing to be more recreation-oriented which means they are going to have a need for storage of different items. However, she did have a problem with the garage being larger than the house. If they are going to see a lot of tfiese kinds of requests, then perhaps the Planning Commission and Citv Council should take a look at this part cf the code. APPEALS COHMISSION MEETING, APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 7 Mr, Clark stated that if indeed the petitioner needs more storage space, to meet code he can only add about 10 ft, onto the existing garage, which would probably not look too good to people driving by, and it would not give him room for a breezeway. He stated this was a smaller home, built in 1956, and most new homes are built much larger than this. He stated he has not gotten a permit for a house to be built less than 1,000 sq, ft, for the last five years. He did not know if it was good to have the code changed for just one instance. Mr, Betzold stated that, in other words, if the petttioner had fiappened to have a larger house, he would not have needed tfie variance. That helped clarify the situation a little more, but he still felt this particular provision in tfie code needed to 6e reviewed again. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR, BARNR� TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF TXE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALIAW THE TOTAL OF THE ACCESSORY BUILDINGS TO BE 1�000 SQUARE FEET� WITH A DWELLING OF 900 SQUARE pgET� A�y EXCESS OP I00 SQUFiRE FEET� TO ALIAW TNE CONSTRUCTION OF A GRRAGE ADDITION:AND R BFEEZEkAY ON Lp'fS 12 AND I3� BIACK 4� HYDE PARK� THE SAME BEING 6020 4TB STREET N,E,� SUBJECT Tp REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSIDN AND REVIEW AND FINAL APpROVAL BY TXE CITY COUNCIL. UPON A VOZCE i�OTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHATRpERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE MOTZON CARRIED UNpNZ�yOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated the minutes of this meeting would go to the Planning Cortmission on May 8. The Planning Corrmission would review the minutes but would not take any action. Final approval would be by the City Council on May 20. 3. VARIANCE REQUEST PU i ., TO CHAPTER 214 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ] G eques y o a es ree , inneapolis, Mn. 55435). MOTION BY MR, BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. BAR1'dA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC XEARING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLZC HEARING OPEN AT 8:30 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADh1INISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 214.11.26 limits the maximum size of eight (80) square feet in area for a free standing sign. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and excessive use of signs in commercial areas. EASE APPEALS COhP1ISSI0N MEETIN6, APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 8 B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Lost signage in windstorm. Replace with letter quality signage, No increase in total square footage from signage in existence before windstorm." C, ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Prior to 1983, two separate signs were maintained on the property--one was the existing 5 ft. by 10 ft. Spur sign, the other was a 4 ft. by 8 ft. messaqe center. In 1983, a storm damaged the message center;however, it was allowed to be repaired. A storm in 1984 again destroyed the message center. On July 2, 1984, a variance was denied to replace the message center in its originai location-- 1 foot off the south property line and 7 1/2 feet off the west property line. Total free-standing sign area was to be 108 square feet. In February 1985, Ms. Sprang of Murphy Oil prouosed to replace the message center on a separate pylon next to the existing Spur sign. Since that time, the staff and Ms. Sprang have developed a plan which combines the signage on a s9ngle pylon. Ms. Sprang has also ini.tiated action to provide: 1, curbing on the east and south perimeter 2, landscaping within the egress island along Mississippi St. 3, evergreens along the east to supplement the district separation fence The approval of this variance would increase the permitted square footage of a free standing sign from 80 square feet to 98 square feet. Mr. Ciark stated the petitioner has worked with the Planning Department, and it appeared they have agreed to improve tfie landscaping and incorporate some new curbing to bring the property more in compliance witf� today's standards. Ms. Gabe7 asked if the petitioner had any statements to make regarding the need for this variance. Ms. Sprang stated that because signage was lost in a wind storm, they still have a hardship. Her perception of a hardship was that Mr. 5wingdorf, proprietor of the Spur station, was a businessman in the community, and his business depends on advertising to the public. He has lost 32 sq. £t, of signage through no fault of his own, and they are proposing to replace that signage with better quality, more attractive signage, that will not biow down every time there is a puff of wind. The Union 76 station across the street has a reader board, and the new Petro Stop at 81st and East River Road has a reader board. Mr. Swingdorf is at a competitive disadvantage in that he cannot adverttse his specials. She stated they will be spending approximately $2500 in aesthetics to bring the property up to code. APPEALS COM�ISSION MEETING APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 9 Ms. Gabel stated that when things are out of code, they need to be brought back into code compliance, whether it is signs, landscaping, whatever. She would like to see all of these things ha�pen in and of themselves, which nrobably will not happen, but she did not think compliance of the code in other areas that should be in compliance anyway was justification for a variance. She stated the Appeals Cortmission has been quite consistent in their dealinq with cimilar variance requests. Mr. Betzold asked the petitioner if they could accomplish what they want with the smallest Spur sign possible and a 4 ft, by 8 ft, reader board. Could the gas price be put on part of the reader board? Ms, Sprang stated she did not think so because of the corporate image. The corporation usually wants everything uniform in size: Mr. Betzold asked tfie petitioner if che would be willing to discuss this possibility with the corporation. That would make a total square footage of 82 square feet, and he would be more favorable to that size of variance. Ms. 6abel stated she would not, simply because she felt they have to be consistent, They have turned down variances for other gas stations for reader boards. Mr, Barna stated he disagreed with Ms. Gabel, He stated he had looked at Mr. Swingdorf's reader board every day, twice a day, for 16 years. He uses the station once a week, and he noticed the specials and community information Mr. Swingdorf put on the reader board. He would have no objection to the variance. This was not just a gas station; it was a grocery store, too. Mr. Swingdorf stated that as proprietor of the Spur station, he was at a definite disadvantage with his competition. CitySStaff,5totcomehupfwith5whatdMracDomernfeltdthe1A�peals Commi�smon'would appeove. They had contacted the neighbors regarding landscaping, had gotten bids--all this had been done in good faith. She would like to hear the sPgnage and�they�wouldetry�todmeetnthoseWrecommendations��ssible as far as Mr. Betzold stated that even if the Appeals Commission was to deny the variance, this still went to City Council, and City Council had the final approval, He stated that, also, there were two commissiuners not at the meeting who might have different input, different ideas, and different questions. Ms. Gabel stated the Appeals Commission could make a recomnendation at this meeting and send it on to City Council, or they could make a motion to table the item if the petitioner would like to go back and talk to the corporation about any other possibilities. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETiN6, APRIL 23; 1985 PAGE 10 Ms. Sprang stated she would like the Comnission to table this item until the next meeting. MOTZON BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO TABLE THIS STEM UNTIL 2HE NEXT MEE?'ZNG AT TXE PETITIONER`S REQUEST. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabe7 stated the next Appeals Commission meeting was May 74. 4, VARIANCE REOUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDt7CE son, ouuu uaKiey �treec n.t „ rrlaiey, Mn. MOTION BY MR, BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO OPEN THS pUSLIC HEARSNG. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHA£RPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC 3EARING OPEN AT 8:54 P.M, ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6800 Oakley Street N.E. A, PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIRFIYIENT: Section 205.07.3D.2c.1 requires the side yward setback on a street side of a corner lot to be not less than seventeen and one-half (17.5) feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sigfit" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard, 8. STATED HARDSHIP: "I would like to build my garage at the same setback distance that my house is from the curb line on 68th Avenue. This would keep the house and garage in line for a neat appearance and save as much of the back yard as possible." C, ADMINISTRATIUE STAFF REVIEW: The only thing the staff would ask the Board to consider is that the garage be pTaced 20 feet off the street right of way so as to provide space to park a vehicle in front of the garage door without encroaching into the street right of way. APPEALS LOMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 23, 1985 PAf,E 11 Mr. Clark stated this variance request was similar to the variance request on Channel Road. He stated the house right behind the petitioner on Pandora was closer to 68th Ave. than what the proposed qarage would be at 172 ft. He stated the petitioner has a sirgle car garage off Oakley St. The petitioner fias requested a special use permit for two garages. At their last meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the special use permit. That recommendation, along with the variance request, will go to City Council on May 6. Mr. Anderson stated he would like to keeo the garage in line with the house. As it was, he was going to have to sacrifice three trees. If the qarage was to be moved back to 20 ft., he woi�ld probably lose a fourth tree. Also, if the garage was at 20 ft „ fie would lose a good portion of his garden which wes verv important to them. Thev have a 20 ft. by 20 ft, garden. He stated that a � member of the Appeals Commission had mentioned a concern about line of sight earlier in the meeting. By keeoinq his garage in line with his house at 172 ft., he definitely did not see a problem. He stated he has two big blue spruces in �� front yard that were more of a problem for visibility than the garage, Mr. Anderson stated that, as Mr, Clark had mentioned, the house at 499 Pandora, stuck out 10 ft, farther than his does. The house is 23 ft. from the curb. If he had a 10 ft, boulevard, which was quite normal in the City, rather than 15 ft., there would be no problem. He would be over the 20 ft. for parking. He stated his hardship was losing an additional tree and losinq part of his garden. He was back from the street 32 ft. now, and he saw no visual problem for traffic. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR, gARNA, TO CLOSF. THE pUBLIC XEARING. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HERRING CLOSED AT 9:03 P.M. Mr. Barna stated he had no problem with this variance request. Mr, Betzold sta�ed he would have difficulty approving this variance when they had approved the variance for the garage on Channel Road at 20 ft. He stated he also did not like to see trees torn down, but the fact was that the petitioner was already tearing down a few trees. He did not like to see gardens torn up, but the petitioner was already tearing up a good part of the back yard which was the petitioner's decision. He could not see grantinq a variance just for those reasons. He would be willing to approve the variance at 20 ft. in order to be consistent with what they had done earlier. Ms. Gabe7 stated her comments were similar to the first variance reauest. She personally had no objection to the garage being at 17� ft. However, she felt the hardship was a little vague, and she also felt they needed to be consistent with these variance requests. APPEALS La161ISSI0N MEFTING, APRIL 23, i985 PAGE 12 5. MOTIDN BY Mft, BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR, BARNA� TO RECOMMEND APpROVAL OF A YARIANCE REQUESS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE TffE SIDE YARD SETBACK ON A CORNER-LOT FROM 25 FEET TO 20 FEET TO ALLOW PHE CONSTRUCTION OF A 24 FT, BY 26 FT, DETACNED GARAGE ON IAT Z3� BLOCK 3� HROOKVIEW TERRACE SECOND ADDITSON, THE SAME BESNG 6800 OAKLEY STREET N.E. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED i7NANZMOUSLY. . s ,—TT�n .-55433 ) . MO2ION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO OPEN TNE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOFCE VOTE� RLL VOTZNG AYE, CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED T%E PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9:II P.X, Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADM?NISTRATIVE S7AFF REPORT 5536-38 7th Street N,E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIRETIENT; Section 205.08.3A requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet for a two-family dwelling unit. Public purpose served by this requirement is to avoid the condition of overcrowding of a residential neighborhood. Section 205.08.3D.2c,7 requires a side yard width on a street side of a corner lot to be not less than seventeen and one-half (17.5) feet. Public purpose served by this requirement 4s to mafntain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. 5ection 205.08.3d,1 requires a minimum front yard setback of not less than thirty-five (35) feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide desired front yard space to be used for green areas on access and to add to the attractabil{ty of a residential district, APPEALS COMMISSIDW MEETINr,, APRIL 23 1985 PAGE 13 B. STATED HARDSHIP: "I intend to build a zero lot line double bungalow for my own use. This property would have its highest and best use as a double bungalow rather than a single family dwelling as it is close to the freeway and in an area of other rental property." C, ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The excessive, unused right of way, acquired at the time the freeway was constructed, created large boulevard spaces between the lot line and the paved portion of the road right-of-way. If the Board approved this request, your motion could include a recommenda- tion that the City work with the petitioner to deed the excess right of way back to the adjacent lot. Mr. Clark sho�ed the Commissioners an aerial photo of the property. He stated there was between 70-80 ft, of boulevard between the south lot line and the service drive along 694, Mr. Westling showed the Commissioners a letter he had written to the State some time ago inquiring about tfie 80 ft. by 25 ft, piece of property. He had been told by tfie State that the lot was given to the City of Fridley, He stated he has attempted to purchase that lot from the City of Fridley,but beca�se of the possible development of the drive-in property, the City is not willing to sell that piece of property at this time. Mr, Westling stated he felt the construction of a double bungalow will be a nice addition to the area. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLZC XEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED RT 9:18 P.H, Mr. Barna stated he saw no hardships that were created by the owner. The owner has shown an attempt to retrieve ownership of the 80 ft. by 25 ft. piece of property in order to increase fiis lot size to satisfy the lot size re4uire- ments, tfie front yard and side yard requirements. The propert,y is properly zoned for multiple dwelling, so he would be in favor of granting the variances. Mr, Betzold stated he agreed, Because of the existing problems, he did not see anything t�at could be done otfier than to grant the variances and allow the petitioner to bui7d a multiple dwelling on this property. Ms, Gabel stated she also agreed. At some point, depending on what does develop on the drive-in property, there may or may not be some property turned hack, but in the meantime, there was no reason to hold up Mr. Westling's construction. She agreed a double bungalow would be a desirable use of that property and would certainly not be an overuse of the land. APPEALS COMM155ION MEETING, APRIL 23, 1985 PAGE 14 MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLI7, 3'O RECOMMEND 2t� CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL O£ THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COL1E TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR A DOUBLE BUNGAZAW FROM 10�000 SQUARE FEET TO 9,416 SQUARE FEETj TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK ON A CORNER ZAT FROM I7 1/2 FEET TO 5 FEET; AND REDUCE THE FRON2 YARD SETBACK OR A PORTFON OF THE FRONT YARD (SOUTX SZDE) FROM 35 FEE2 TD 11,5 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTZON OF A DOUBLE BUNGALOW ON ZATS 4 AND 5� BLOCK 8� HAMILTON`S ADDITSON TO MECNANICSVILLE� EXCEPT THAT PART WXICH LIES SOUTH- EASTERLY OF THE FOLIAWZNG DESCRIBED LSNE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON TXE SOUTH LINE OF SRZD LOT 5, DISTRNT 25 FEES WEST OF THE�SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF: TfIENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY TO 2HE CORNER OF LOT 4, AND TNERE TERMINATING� THE SAME BEING 5536-38 7TX STREET N.E. UPON A I�OZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAFRpERSON GABEL DECZ.ARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. MOTION 8Y MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. HETZOLD, TO XECOMMEND TNAT CITY STAFF WORX WITH TH$ PETITSONER TO DEED THE EXCESS RIGHT OF WAY BRCK TO THE ADJRCENT IAT . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARR£ED UNANIMDUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTZON By MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO ADJDURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE APRZL 23� 1985� APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M, Respectfully sub 'tted, �� ynn� a a Recording Secretary .� C�� '� ����� ��` y�" � ,���" ; � ���� ��L��� _--- - �.�'�inv � , . �:� �� _ �-,�...� .� � .�-�,,,;;� - �� � � �� � � il_,,. �, � , r� 1 , � < �-r-.����.�� i.�t�-�-e� �rt�`�.,_rz_= �=�-r--r�� l . � @�.�l�"-v _. � . � . y . 7 _. . . � '/ u��� ��.� 7.s-q a - �y�ti � �� I _ .� /W-VYWZ i���(N/ /�.��LY� ��1. ^'C�Xi�G . l�lJ.YL�//. ✓�ulL�-x-I / \ ✓' � J ��l,c�.���� �_ �� G ��� ��.k.�. ��.;�,, , ,t�� ' �� �_ �� I � � , , ��� /--'�`� �`f%�O � ['� i�� �l� ���c�-i �,�_ � � �, - - / � � , � � ��'` � � S��S ��!�_>�, ���l��r�. ��Xgj d'�v���„t.`;;�„"; �. �� �/�� / � � .�1G�2�L�' E�l��y- �2,f ,�s �jr.c�k �k'z�d _ �����y� 1 `���-�j �`{� /Cicf (L'f�ic U/Jc�— � �'=y i � G��-�-�, � �.s � i� y �.� � i� w �-o�� �' �, � 1 ,�'�� ? ;��� .���- ����.,�.�� �� ',� � � � , �` �c2 � ;�� ai ��y (� 99- ��-.-� � %� c�' �� _/`�,� / � ��--���.��z��n / � e�. � � - ���.�..�- � <e / �� � ,G������� .��,� ; � � � jr ,r� � �� � �� � � L+-L .., i�(�/ . _ 4"; _ ' � � ', �.,�'�,2�:= �-�N,�(,^ ���� , �-��-�/ �� , ��- � ' �%� ' `-��� ��� � � � u � ? - `'' %, � _ y� � � / 1t'�c.c��, a'cr�„a,tr-�- 7S`/9 ���2�ci o`C°n�e- �� /Lcc��t� ) � %�v �� q -���� o M A��r �1 s� S 3� d sT� !�( � � tG �� � „ ,_ /� � , �� _ F �-c /G �A; ' ` ���� � �� C..� G �3 � ��- _!�?�'c/7 • � ���-�,v� �o � - -�,. ��/t% � � �,�'L �f���^'� l �-��r �/. e�cJ C-t/�r � �'✓-ec��.�.-� i`'�� f�z--- '.S �'� i'r`"�"�"-Z �r,'.z, � / � i / I�'/, ��L.- c1i9 h,�E ,,: : S��' s,E.yu1.�c �,LA-,.� E.v� c. �ul�.C_`�^"'a� �W��2,� % _3 j K� � rf?` �`�� v'�.�, i�I '`( : � � Z- ��yi.iz/�O '7Sb'�l' �L�c, p��c.., %� � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?sg'► _ !�-,'� G a_YS�1Y€�" _ � �/ I . _ _ _I_ _ � i PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Lity of Fridley AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 1985 APPROYE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 3, 1985 7:30 P.M. PAGES 1-34 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 35 - 41 SP 85-03, fRIDLEY CONYALESCENT HOME, 9Y BETTY J. WALL: Per Section 205.07.1, C, 6, of the Frid ey City Code, to allow parking lot expansion on Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Manor Addition� the same being 7590 Lyric Lane N.E. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP N85-04, BY L NCE A. LINDt4AN: Per Section 205.07.1, 3, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 2D by 16 foot garage, to be used for storage of a classic car, on Lot 26 and the 4orth 25 feet of Lot 25, Block I6, Plymouth including the vacated alley, the same being 4565 - 3rd Street N.E. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. 85-0 , LANDMARK DD1T10N, 6V ROBERT MLADAM: Being a replat of the property described as Lot 5, Revised Auditor'S Subdivision No. 77. 4. TABLED 2/27/85: LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #`85-03, BY ROBERT GILSTAD: Sp it off the Easter y 120 feet, except the Northerly 135 feet of part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25 (see file for complete legal) to be used as a parking lot for the apartments on Lynde Drive. (Moore Lake Apartments Complex) 5 F� REVIEW DF AN ORDI F 7. REVIEW OF AN OP,DINA�7C FYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE iIGN PLAN FOR 7570 HIGHWAY 42 - 47 :i��7 � 69 - 74 75 - 80 RIDLEY CITY CODE $1 - 99 8. REVIEW OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE RECODIFYIPIG THE FRIDLEY CITY 1D0 - 102 CODE BY ADOPTING A NEIr CHAPTER 208 ENTITLED "SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA REGULATIONS. 9. APPROVAL Of COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL GRANT APPLICATION. 103 Information only 10. REYIEW OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE fRIDLEY CITY CODE 104 - 110 Y NG H P ER N L D D SPOS L BY RENAMING L ; -AIIIITft� . � ELTI-QFt� 113.01, 113.06 113.07, 113.10, 113.12 AND 113.13. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 8, 1985 -- Page 2 11. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26, 1985 lp, RECEIVE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL , 985 See Motion to City Council on Page 6 13. RECEIVE ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 2, 1985 14. RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1985 15. RECEIVE COMMUNITY DEUELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 9, 985 See Motion to City Council on Page 2 16. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 9, 1985 17, RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 1985 ig; RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF 19. OTHER BUSINESS: hDJOURNMENT: IL 23, 198 PAGES BLUE GREEN LILAC SALMON PINK YELLOW BLUE YELLOW