PL 08/07/1985 - 30636CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 7, 1985
� ...........................................
�CALL TO�ORDER:
Chairwoman Schnabel called the August 7, 1985, Planning Comnission meeting to
order at 7:39 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Mr. Minton, Mr. Kondric�, Mr. Saba,
Mr. Wellan
Members Absent: Ms. Gabel
Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
John & Sue Rau, 1341 - 64th Ave..N,E.
Bob Calderon, 6401 Central A�e. N,E.
A1 Nelson, Burlington Northern
Jon Monson, 5200 Wilson Rd. #401
B. B. Chapman, Barton Aschman Assoc.
_ _._... ... .. _.. _ .. ...... ... .. .. ... .... . .. . . .. .
APPRQ�AI. � OF �ULi( ' 1?; ' 1985; PLANpIl�6 COA�NIIS��0�1 ��l i�k�TES ;
MO2'ION 19Y MR. ICONDRICK� 5ECONDE.b �3Y MR, WELLAN� TD. APPROI�E T1YL� JULY 17, Z485,
� PLANNING COINMISSION MINUTLcS A5 WRITTEN. �
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AY'E, CHA3RWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION ,
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. RUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL 11SE PERNIIT, SP #85-09, BY
• er ect on .., , o e rt ey �. y o e o a ow
�'f'i'e construction of a second accessory auilding, a 24` by 2p` shed with
an attached breezeway on Lot 2, Block l, Spring Yalley Addition, the same
being 1341 - 64th Avenue N.E.
MO� TION BY MR. MINTadN, SEC ONDED BY lNR. SABA� TO OPEN THE PUBLZC HEARING.
ON SP #85-09 BY JOHN RAU.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECZARED TXE PUBL.�
HEARING OPEN AT 7:40 P.M.
Mr. Rob�nson stated this property was located �'u�t nortfi.. of fi4t�. Ave, and
east of Highway 65. It was zoned sz.ngle family and �tas adjacent to light
con�nercial to tEee west. The proposed building would be in the rear of the
lot with approx. 50/50 split between shed and breezeway. No drfveway was
proposed to the structure. He stated t�e only stipulation Sta�Pf would
recommend was that t�is b�ilding not 6e used as a primar,� garage.
Mr. Robinson stated tf�ere have been no objections from tfie neighborhnod.
r'1
^
PLANNiN� CO�MISS���N'�EETIN6; A�GUST'7, 1985 . PAGE 2
Mr. Minton asked wha� this building would be used for.
Mr. Rau stated he originally intended to build a 24� x 10` shed but decided
to add 10 more feet for a breezeway. He stated t�e shed �ould be used
strictly for storage of lawnmo�er, garden equipment, etc., and a 6oat.
Mr. Bob Calderon, 6401 Central Ave., Stated f�e ►�as a neig�bor, and he �ad no
objection to this building.
MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. ICONDRICK, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON SP #85-09.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
H6ARING CLOSED AT 7;44 P.M.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO RECQMMEN,D�-TO CITY COUNCIL
APRROVAL OF CON5IDERATIO�V OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #85--09.� BY JOHN RAU,
PER SECTION 205.07, 1, C, Z OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOW T�IE CONSTRUCTION
OF A SECOND ACCE550RY BUILDING, A 24� BY 20' SHE'D WITH AN ATTACHED BREEZEWAY
ON LOT 2� BLOCK I� SPRING VALLEY ADDITION, THE 5AME BEING 1341 - 64�'H AVENUE N.E.,
WITH THE STIPULATION THAT TXE BUILDING NOT BE USED FOR MOTOR VEXICLES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CKAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UN.�NIMOU5LY.
n
Mr. Robinson stated this item would go to City Council on Aug. 19.
�
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIUERATION UF A PRELIMINARY PtAT, P:S: �85-Q�:; GREAT
�Ti�T�T�Lr�7rPR�*n■nh* �r--,�..,.�..w . ..�...� _
that
�a� � �� ���C �� yuarzer or �ect�on zz, T-30, R-�and of the NE quarter of
Section 27, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, that lies Southerly of the Southerly
right-of-way line of Interstate Highway No. 694, Easterly of the Easterly line
of the P�at of Great Northern Industr�al Center, Fridle,�, Northerly of the
Northerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Midwest Addition and Westerly of a line
92.9 feet Westerly of and parallel with the center line of t�e Burlington
Northern Inc, ma�n trac�s as it now exists. Containing 12.4 acres more or less.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, 5ECONDED BY MR. SABA� Tl� OPE1V THE pUBLIC IiEARING ON
85-03, GREAT NORTHERN INDU5TRIAL CENTER EAST, BY ALFRED NEL50N.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLAFtED 2"HE PUBLIC
HEARING OPEN AT 7:47 P.M.
Mr, i�obinson stated this propo�ai i,nvo]ve.d approx. T2.4:�acres:iocated s:outh
of 694 and west of the Burlington Northern railroad spur. It was in a plat
of land that is rapidly develop�ng. The zonfng for tF�e entire plat was M-2
(heavy industrial) and the proposed use of mini-storage would fit into that
zoning.
�'1
PLANNI�G'_CON�IISSI,ON� �EETIN6; Al:1GUST � 7; � 1985 . . . . . . PAGE 3
Mr. Robinson stated access to the plat would be through 53�^d Way onto Industrial
Boulevard which would be ex�ended in a ner� street (A�hton�. He stated t�ro
existing railread spurs �ould remai.n as outlots dividing the site into �wo distinct
tax parcels.
Mr. Robinson stated t�e only stipulation was the park fee be paid before the
plat is recorded, and the petitioner has agreed with that stipulation. Engi-
neering on the development is being worked out witk� city staff, and they feel
all requirements will be complTed with with no problems. He stated the third
item on the agenda was a public hearing for a spec�al use permit �ihich was
related to the busin�ss proposed for this proeprty.
Mr. A1 belson, Burlington Northe.rn, stated t�ii:s;�� formally operating property
which was not included in their original plat of tfie industria] park. Concurrent
with the interest in developing the property plus the fact that the operating
use of the property has been released freeing it up for development purposes,
that was the reason for platting the area.
Ms. Schnabel asked if � rlington Northern was selling the property.
Mr. Nelson stated they are selling the 7+ acres, leaving 3+ acres w�icfi they
wiil als� be selling.
MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON
� P5. 85-03.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING ,'�YE� CHAIRWOM.AN SCHNABEZ DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 7:57 P.M.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
THE APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #85-03� GREAT NORTHERN INDU5TRIAL CENTER
EAST BY.�FRED NEL50N� BEING A REPLAT OF ALL THAT PART OF THE SE QUARTER OF
SECTION 22� T-30� R-24 AND OF THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 27� T-30� R-24� ANOKA
COUNTY THAT LIES 50UTHERLY.OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF INTER5TATE
HIGHWAY NO. 694� EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE' OF TXE' PL�'1T OF GR�AT NORTHERN
INDU5TRIAL CENTER� FRIDLEY� NORTHERLY OF TFIE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1� BLOCK 1�
MIDWEST ADDITION AND WESTERLY OF A LINE 92.9 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WI�1
THE CENTER LINE OF THE BURL.TNGTON IJORTHERN INC. MAIN TRACKS A5 IT NOW EXISTS.
CONTAINING 12.4 ACRES MORE OR LESS� WITH THE STIPULATION TXA�" THE PARK FEE BE
PAID BEFORE THE PLAT IS RECORDED.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, A.�.L VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN 5CHNABEL DECLA:RED TFIE MOTIN
CARRIIs'D UNAN.IMQUSLY.
_ .. _
� 3. Pf1BCIG�HEARING:��C�NSI�ERATI0IV'OF'A�SPEC�A'L�WSE'PE�I�T;'SP #8�-�8;�BURt�IN6TON
' ' ' • er ec t on .., , o e r1 ey 1 y o e
o a ow ex erior s orage of materials and equipment on a strip of land
generally located West of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and East
of the Great �lorti�ern Industrial Center Plat. All lying i� the South half of
^ Section 22, T-30, R-24 and in t�e NortFi half of Sect�on 27, T.3Q, RT24,
County of Anoka, Minnesota.
PtANNI�G CONIMiSSION��EETING, AUGUST 7, 1985 PAGE 4
�
MOTION BY MR. WELLAN� SEC�rI;iED �y MR. OQUIST, TO OPEN THE FIfBLIC HEARING ON
SP 85-08�BURLINGTON NORTHERN, BY JON MONSON.
UPON A VOICE VOT�� ALL VOTING AYE� �IiA2RWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC
HEARING OPEN AT 5:00 P.M.
Mr. Robinson stated this proposal was for Lot l, Block 1, and Lot l, Block 2,
of the proposed plat. It involved use of approx..7.3 acres. T"he building area
was 127,930 sq, ft. Lot coverage was 37%, and nine parking stalls were proposed
for the p1an.
Mr. �io6inson stated tbe proposal �as �or outside storage of recreational
vehicles. The stor�ge facilities would not be visible from any public right-
of-way except possibly from 694 and that v�sibility would 6e li:mited.
Mr. Robinson stated the petitioner has completed a landscape plan with screening
of parking areas, drives, and storage area. Staff's only stipulation was that
the landscaping plan and screening be worked out with staff. Engineering
is proceeding with a plan for on-site drainage. Concrete curb and gutters will
be around the perime�er of the site.
Mr. Jon Monson stated they are purchasing the property from Burlington Northern.
He stated it was a somewhat broken up site i.n terms of effi:cienc� W�th the
Burlington Northern railroad spur going through it. �ortunately tFie spur is
�1 used infrequently (1-2 times a month}. Tf�e spur-which goes to Plywood Minnesota
is currently not in use at all, and they have requested that Plywood Minnesota
take it out. Plywood Minnesota does not use it, but they want to leave their
options open.
/'1
Mr. Kondrick stated that
to run across the tracks
or do they want gates to
regarding the railroad spur, do th.ey want the gate
on each side to prevent the trains from going through
run parallel with the tracks?
Mr. Monson stated that was a good question, and in their negotiations with
Burlington Northern, they have expressed their preference for putting gates
across the tracks. From a property standpoint, Burli.ngton Nortfiern �rould be
in favor of it, but from an operational standpoint, tE�ey would not. Whether
it goes like that or whether they end up putti:ng up a moving gate parallel to
the tracks is a matter of negotiation at this time. They feel their preference
for the perpendicular placement of gates was not unreasonable due to the
infrequency of trains and the proximity of the gates.
Mr. Kondrick stated that regarding o.pen storage, is the property going to be
fenced on all sides?
Mr. Monson stated, yes, because security was of prime concern to them. They
are the only mini-storage company in the area which alarms every door. This
doesn t apply to the outdoor storage except for the fact that they use a
parking lot type of gate access to get on the site. They not only have chain
link gates that close after 9 p.m, untfl 7 a.m., but they also have a computer
�
. _ _ ._ __. - �� - � __
. PLA�iN�N6- �f�11�I55I�N� I�EETIN6; � AU6UST 7; ' 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . ..PAGE 5
system where a person has to register his/her personal code to get in and out,
and then they also have data on file as to wEw comes and goes.
Mr. Wel l an stated that �rith a doub.l e gate systero at tFie rail road spur, �rhat kind
of problems could they run �nto as far as fire or poli:ce emergencies?
Mr. Monson stated that because tbey prefer the perpendi:cular gates:, tbere r�ould
not be a problem. There might be more of a pro61em in tl� case of a pohrer
outage that would preclude easy access across the tracks. That �cas not to say
the fire trucks could not access from Plywood Minnesota or a]ong the railroad
right-of-way because it looks like there is good access from all around the
property.
Mr. Kondrick asked if there were provisions in the contracts.r�ith t�e renters
that prevented the renters from storing chemicals.
Mr. Monson stated, yes, tFiey do �ave provis.�ions in t�..e lease agree�ent that
prevent the storage of any materi,als that are dangeraus i.n any �ay�.
Mr. Kondrick stated he had a concern relative to vandalism. It seemed that
areas along railroad tracks were extremely vulnerable to vandalism and t�at
type of thing.
Mr. Monson stated they �ave experienced being hy railroad tracks at their
r"1 St. Louis Park facility. That faci]ity is within 100 ft. of the tracks. They
� feel more comfortable in Fridley than in St. Louis Park because in Fridley they
can put up an 8 ft. high chain link fence while in St. Louis Park they can only
put up a 6 ft. fence. Nowever, they have not had any problem in St. Louis Park--
probably more problems with kids in the neighborhood�than with transi�ents.
The site is very clean, tf�e garage doors are alarroed, and eyen if there fs
unauthorized entry, what persons can do on the property is very limited. If
they try to get in a unit, as soon as the lock is cut or the door opened, an
alarm will go off. He stated they have 3M monitor system, and t�ey �iave a
good wor[cing relationshlp with the City of $t. Louis Par[c so tfiat if and when
help is needed, the police will respond. They do not want to endanger--t6e
resident manager so they do ask for t�at type of support from the cit,p.
Ms. Schnabel asked about lighting.
Mr. Monson stated they use a high pressure sodium light which is spaced so
they can light not only the perimeter but also the i.nterior a�isle �from the
lights on the building. The unique feature they have is the covered aisles
which are lit on the ceiling.
Ms. Schnabel asked about electrical outlets, ►�ater, or drains available to
the renters.
Mr. Monson stated that in the rental agreement they try to make it clear that
these units are for passive us.e only and are not intended as a�ro�^kshop area.
� Tbat disrupts the whole purpose of mini-storage. So, no, t�e renters wiil not
have access to water. If a ren�er wants a light in his/her unit, it will
cost so much extra. Because of the Way they are configured.and because of
�
__
PCANNiNG'COh�IP�lISSI�N'I�EE�iNG;�A�6�ST 7;'1985.. � .............. ..... :.��PAGE�6
their operati.ng hours, the use and requi�rement of electricity is really kept
at a minimum. They do have outlets that a renter has access to.for a trouble
light. There are no interior drains. All the water leaving the site wi17 go
down into the middle of t�ie drive aisle ►�hicF� is 40 ft, Wride in t�e middle
and 25 ft. wide on the outside and then cfianneled a�ray to a catcfi basin.
Ms. Schnabel asked about the office/residence and sno►� removal.
Mr. Monson stated there �c-ill 6a an offi.cejresidence �the�^e the resfdent manager
will leave. They do have thei.r or�n maintenance vehi.cles, but sometun�s they
have to contract witFi larger vehicles for snow removal, In case of heavy
snowfall, the snow is hauled out to another dumping ground.
Mr. Monson stated the gate hours are 7.a.m, to s.p.m, and t�e office Fwurs
are 8 a.m, to 5:30 p.m.
MOTION BY MR. 5ABA� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO CLOS�' THE pUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE � ALL VOTING AYE � CbiAIREVOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TIiE PUBLIC
HEARING CL05ED AT 8:42 P.M.
Mr. Oqulst stated he was impressed with�t�is propo�ai and �a� ver� impressed
with the security.
^ MO�TI.ON BY MR. OQUIST, 5ECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO RECOMAfEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL U5E PERMIT, SP #SS-08, BURLINGTON
NORTHERN, BY JON MON50N� PER SECTlON 205.Z8.1, C� 9 OF THE FRI�LEy CITY CODE
TO ALLOW EXTERIOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPINENT ON A STRIP OF LAND
GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS AND EAST
OF THE GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER PLAT. ALL LYING IN THE 50UTH HALF
OF SECTION 22� T-30� R-24 AND IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTIQN 27, �'-30, R-24�
COUNTY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTA� WITH THE STIPULATION THA�' THE LANDSCAPE PLAN BE
APPROVED BY THE CITY.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECLARED THE !►fOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Robinson stated that at tFiei.r Aug. T9th me.eting, tfiee. City� Council �cill
set a public hearing on this item for Sept. 9, so the special use permit, the
plat, and a sign variance will all go to the City Council on Sept. 9.
4. CONINIUNITI� DEVEtOP�1ENT� COI�I��SSION' REHIEW:
Mr. Oquist stated that as the Planning Commission members knew, in the past
the members of the Community Development Commission have had the pro6lem of
the lack of direction for this commission. He stated tfiey�have again E�ad a
lengthy discussion and fee] tf�ey are really notFiing more than a mini—planning
Comnission. Things tf�ey normally would have done in the past have more or less
been taken over by the HRA, so the Community Development Commission is somewhat
^ lost as to what direction their commission should go.
PCANNI�6�CO��ISSION MEETING, AUGUST�7; 1985 PAG� 7
�
Mr. Oquist stated f�e attended tbe City Council conference meeti.ng on July 29.
He stated it was a very good meeting. Tf�ey tal [ced over sorr� th%ngs, and the
City Council still ]ikes the neighbortwod concept idea, even tEwug� the
Community Development Comnission �as discussed it twice and rejected it twice.
He stated tfie Councii gave Fi�m a paropE�] et on "roother-in-�1 ar� apartments"
wFiich is a pro6lem that is going to have to b� addressed �:n the city. �City
Council wants the Conxnuni.ty Development Commission to loo[c at the golf course.
issue. The City Counci� also talked about the possibility of a comnunity
service officer working out of their area, but he was not sure what that would
involve.
Mr. �quist stated these are nice individual i.deas, but the Cor�nissi.on does not
want individual project direction. These kinds of ideas should have been
passed down to the Community Deve7opment Comnis�ion during the year r�hen the
Commission needed projects. Wbat the Cor�nuni:ty Development Coromissioa is really
after is some direction--a c�arter of the Commission`s responsibilities. The
Community Development Commission had 6een looking at the possi6i.lity of being
a liaison between the City and the HRA or subcommission to the HRA, but the
City Council did not think that was very viable.
Mr. Oquist stated they also discussed that it has: been 1Q..12 years since the
reorganization. The Community Development Commission was made up of three other
commissions that were consolidated into one. TE�e City Counci:l Fias �eard other
comments about Environmental Quality Commi�sion and Energy Corom�;ssion having
n similar issues. He thougF�t tFie charge c�as for tfie Plannirrg Commi�sion and
staff to review the conmission structure. He felt the s�ze of tFiee planning
Commission right now of seven members was a nice size and made a very workable
commission. If they were to decrease the number of commissibns, he did not
think they would want to decrease the size of the Planning Commission. Maybe
other members would have to be appointed to the Planning Commission by the
City Council.
Ms. Schnabel stated she had been giving this subject a lot of thought after -
reading Mr. Flora's memo to Mr. Robinson and the Planni.ng Coramissi:on members.
She had the following ideas:
(1) That the Planning Commission ta[ce a look at the variou� components
of the city and its needs and try to redefine, if they can, those
specific areas they feel as citizens and residents they would like
to have an opportunity to study, review, or oversee, and to make
recommendati�ns to the�City Council. For instance, the business
comnunity and the City's relationship with the business corr�nunity.
There is no commission that deals specifically with the business
community.
(2) That they do soroe researcfi �itfi other comnunities and f��nd out i.f
there are areas other communiti:es are active in that.
the City of Fridley is not. Tf�ey could possibly assign this task
to the Community Development Commission.
Mr, Oquist stated t�e ot�er question r�as: Do tEiey� feel tfie. current commissions
^ are adequate?
�
�
PLA�NING Cf�I�iSSION'�EETIN6� AUGUST 7, 1985 PAGE 8
Mr. Mtnton stated that even if they did feel the current commissions were
adequate, it was a good zdea to periodically review tfie commiss�on structure--
maybe every five years. He t�oug�t the two ideas Ms. Sch�abel had were good.
Another thing that concerned �1m was that some of the most important issues
t�at come before city government are things the commissions do not review.
Ms. Schnabel asked Mr.
be willing to contact
those commissions.
Oquist if tfie Community Deve]opment Commis�ion would
other conununities and call a6out the str�ucturing of
Mr. Oquist stated he would ta[Ue this 6ack to the Coramuni�ty� Development Comnission
and see if they were willing to do that. Maybe staff could p.rovide the
commission with a list of communfties to contact. He �tated the Coromunitp
Development Commission might even invite each commission chairperson to a
meeting to give a short presentation on what his/her commission does.
Ms. Schnabel s�ated it would be great if the Coromunity�Development Coramission
would take on the project of reviewing the whole commission pro�ess and making
.recommendat}on�. . .
_ . _ ___ __. _ _ .... ...... .. .
5. ' RECEIVE � JUL�I ` 1 1985; PARCCS �& RECREATiQ�I EONII�iSSION � N1It�l�fi£S;
MOTIIXV BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECEIVE TI�E JULY 1, 1985�
PARICS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL V02'ING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCFINABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSZY.
The Commission members expressed some concern about where the money goes
tfiat is received for par[c fees and how much money is� hroug�t in from park
fees. Tfie-pWrpose of these park fees was for park improvements. T�ey asked
staff to provide tfie Commission with the park fund and 6alance sheet.
Mr. Saba stated he would li�e to see a plan of proposed park i,mprovements.
Mr. Kondrick stated he would try to get this information for the Corr�nission.
. ...... ...... ......
6. RECEIVE JUtY ,2, � 1985; ENERGY PROJECT� COI�IN�TT�E'I�INk�TES:
___._
MOTIQN BY MR. SABAR SECOjVDED BY MR. MINTON, TO RECEIVE TXE JULY 2,.I985�
ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MINUTE5. '
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL UOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED T13E MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
�
PLANN�N6 COMMI�SIUN_'�EETING;�AUGUST�7;�1985. . . . .PAGE 9
. . ....... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
7, RECEIVE � Jf1L' �' 11; '1985; ' �iI�I�AN' RESOIyRCES'CO�I�ISSION'HIINI�TES:
. , �.�...._
MOTION BY PlR. 1►1INTON� SECONDED BY AIR. SABA� TO RECE�YE ,7`ULI,^ 11 � I�85� HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. � �'
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHN.ABEL DECZAR£D THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. RECEIVE JUCY 11, 1985, HOUSING &�REDEVELOPMENT�AUTHORITI��MI�UTES:
M02'ION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. (�iEL�AN� 2'O REC�.LT1E. TI�E JULY I1� 1185,
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTXORITY MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� A.LL VOTING AYE� CHAIRF�OMAN SCHN.ABEL DECIARED THE MOTI'ON
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
_ .. ... . ... .. ... .. ... ...... ...... ...... ......
9. RECEIVE JIILi( � 23; 1985; APPEAk.S � C011N1�S��OFt �J�I�I�TES: -
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, 5ECONDED BY MR. MIN�'ON, TO RECEIVE THE JULY 23, 1985,
APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE T70TE� ALL VOTING AYEf CHAIRbiD1�1AN SCHNASEI,. DECL�RE,� pHE lyOTLQN
CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY.
� 10. OTtiER Bl�1�INE�S:
a. Satellite Dish Ordinance
Ms. Schnabel stated she read in the City Counci] mi,nutes t�ai tFie
Satellite Dish Ordinance had been tabled 6ecause of questions the
Meyor had raised.
The Commission members expressed concern that tfiis ordinance had been
tabled and asked staff to research why this ordinance was being held �p
and report back to the Commission at their next meeting.
ADJOUf�NMENT:
MOTIQN By MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO ADJOURN T13E MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN 5CHNABEL DEGLARED TIiE AUGUST 7� 1985�
PLANNING COMMIS5ION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10;10 P.M.
Res ctfully submitted,
aa
Recording Secretary
/'1