PL 01/07/1987 - 30655CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANPJING COPIMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 7, 1987
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Billings called the January 7, 1987, Planning Commission meeting
to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
M�mbers Present: Steve Billings, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek,
Donald Betzold, Ricfiard Svanda
Mer�bers A6aent: None
Others Present: Jim Robinson, �lanning Coordinator
�ock Ro�ertson, Community� Development Director
APPROVAL OF DECEf�BER 10, 1986, PLANNING COMIMISSION F1INUTES:
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO APPROVE THE DEC. 10, 1986,
PLANIVING COMMIS520N MIIVUTES AS WRITTEN.
� UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. C0�•JSIDERATTOPJ 0� 1987 COP�f`9UNTTY DEVEI.OPMEIVT BtOCK GRANT ALLOCATIONS:
Mr. Robinson stated Fridley's 1987 CDBG allocation was $109,848--a little
less than last year. In addition, there was still $71,500 from 1985 which
was allocated for burying the NSP power lines on "1ississippi St. west of
llniversity Ave. That money was supposed to be spent by Dec. 31, 1986, but
has 6een delayed because of the County's need to hold off construction on the
intersection until 1988. At this time, it appears the City will be rolling
this fund into the 19�7 funding cycle o�hich will raise the total available
monies for 1987 to$181,348.
P7r. Robinson stated that Staff was proposing the following projects for the
1937 CDB� funds plus tfie 1985 surplus totalling $181,348:
1. $20,000 - Springbrook Nature Center Restoration. This would be used to
continue to clean up the tornado damage and for the replacement
of the handicapped trail. This would be added to the 1985
allocation of $18,544 for a total of �38,544.
2. $10,000 - Locke House Restoration. Historic renovation by North Suburban
Center for the Arts; added to 19�6 allocation of �8,000.
� P1r. Robinson stated at the time Staff proposed the CD�G funding,
they were not sure hoa� much was really needed. In the lease
agreement with the County, North Suburban Center for the Arts
� PLANNING CO�P�9ISSIO� MEETING, JANUARY 7; 1987 PAGE 2
�-�.
,
must come up with $50,000 worth of fundinq. They have
approximately �35,000 which included the �8,000 CDBG funds
from last year. They still need �15,000, so the Commission
mig�t atant to consider increasing the amount recommended by
Staff from $10,000 to $15,000.
3. $74,483 - Mississippi St. powerline burying. For 1988 construction;
previously funded with 1985 CDBG funds.
4. $ 5,000 - Senlors Program Staff person. This funding came through the
E�uman Resources Commission last year as a human service project.
This position is now a contracted city employee.
5. $30,000 - Commercial rehab loans; redevelopment. Upgrading existing
businesses, primarily in redevelopment districts or on an
individual 6asis if it is proven to be in a blighted
area.
�Ir. Ro6lnson stated t�ey are in t�e process of trying to get the
HRA`s approval to expand tFie..tax increment distri.ct to most of the
fiusinesses soutFi of 61st Ave. at� _University Ave. down to
53rd Ave, It would include 1�1innesota Petroleum,,Motor Valet,
Rapid Oil CFiange, Shorties Towing (old site on Univ.)
6. $32,954 - Human Services �- 30l of $109,8�8
7. $ 8,911 �- Anoka County Business Assistance Net�orfc. County�-�ride small
business resource center.
I�r, Ro�inson stated tFw t in the agenda, the Commisslon members
had received a copy of a letter explaining this request. The
program would provide a central clear�ng house to provide assist-
ance or referral to businesses in the County. The program is
being°pro os�d by Roger Jenson, Director of the Anoka County
Economic �evelopment Partnership. �i'he idea is to hire a bus�ness
expert who would be very famillar with state, federal, and
local programs already in existence for small 6usinesses which
�ensen eays ar.e noorly marketed now.
l�r. Rofiinson stated tFie program r�as budgeted at $75,OOQ o�er
a two year period. The City of Fridley's share over that two-
year period was �8,911 each year. There would be some type of
"user fees" for businesses using the program, so they hope
this program will be self-supporting in a few years.
n1r. Ro�lnson stated another component of tFie Anoka County
Business�Assistance Program ivas tFie Coon Rapids Development
Corporation �uhich was a 501C3 organization set up to process
n S,B,A, loans. The red tape for S•B•A. loans was sign�ficant
tC�is agency can help 6usinesses get through that hurdle and help
!`� PLANNIfdG COP�1�IISSION (�EETING, JA�JUARY 7, 1987 PAGF 3
�hem become eligible for these loans. The Business Assistance
Program would 6e providing a service that theCity of Fridle��
cannot provide, and it seemed the City would potentially be
getting a lot for its money.
Mr. Robertson stated fie felt the �8,911 over a two-year period
�tas a very good investment.
Mr. Kondrick stated he was in favor of the CDaG �und5ncr ��locations as presente�l
by Staff.
P�r. Billings suggested that the �74,483 be reduced back to �71,500, and the
rer�ainder allocated to the Locke House restoration.
P1r. Betzold stated fie would agree with that�-the remaining $2,983 could k�e
reallocated eitFi.er to tFie Locke House restoration or to some other area they
agreed upon.
Mr. Billings stated �ie e�s in favor o� tfi.e reh�b loan monies, He stated he
had a business in St. Paul and had utilized reFia6 mon3es. It was a very good
progra►�. It encouraged small 6usinesspeople to do extra things around their
esta�lisFiment tFiey would not necessarily do, and it also provided a pool of
^ monies for situations,put on 6usinesspeople; for example, stipulations required
for special use permits.
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO ADOPT THE 1987 CDBG FUNDING
ALLOCATION5 A5 PRESENTED BY STAFF, WITH TNE EXCEPTION 2'HAT THE MIS5I5SIPPI ST.
POWERLINE BURYING BE REDUCED FROM $74�483 TO $71,500� AND 2'HAT THF, BALAIVCE
OF $2,983 BE REALLOCATED TO COMMERCIAL REHAB LOANS; REDEVELOPMF,NT, BRINGIPIG
THAT TOTAL FROM ,530,000 TO ,532,983.
UPON A VOICE TIOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIlYiOUSLY.
�1r. Robinson sta�e�� Staff u�aS qroposing the following projects �'or the
projected 1988 CDBG funds totalling $109,848:
1. $61,000 �- Riverview Reigfits acquisition. PurcFiase and relocation expenses
for parcels 4, 5, and 6.
2. $23,460 - Commercial reFw6 loans; redeve7opment. Upgrade existing
businesses.
3. $16,477 � Human Services. 15l of $1Q9,848.
4. $ 8,911 - Anoka Co�nty Assistance Network, County-wide small business
resource center.
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO ADOPT �'HE PROJECTED Z988
CDBG FUNDIIVG ALLOCATIONS AS PRESENTED BY STAFF.
UPOIV A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLING5 DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
r�"'� PLANNIfdG COMP1ISSION P9EETING� JANUARY 7� 1987 PAGE 4
�"'�
P�r. Robinson stated Staff was proposing the foliot�►ing projects for the
projected 1989 CDBG funds totalling $109,848c�
1. $67,000 - Riverview Heights acquisition. Purchase and relocation expenses
for parcel 8.
2. $16,371 � Riverview Heights park development. Construction of park
amenities; parking, trails, pic�aic area, boat launch.
3, $10,000 �- Comrrrierclal rehab loans; redevelopment. Upgrading existir�g
6usinesses.
4. $16,477 � Human Services. 15� of $109,848
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. KOIVDRICK, TO ADOP?' THE PROPOSED I989
CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATIONS AS PRE5ENTED BY STAFF.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N B,LLLING5 DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. COfJSIDERATION OF A�J ORD�NANCE RECODIFYING CHARTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE�AS�IT�RELATES'TO�I�EDICA'�A1VD'DE AL'C�II�JIC�PA KING:
N9r. Ro6inson stated Staff was recoTrmiending that tFie follov�ing wording be added
to the ordinance in C-1, C-2, C-3, and CR-1 zonings relating to parking require-
ments for medical and dental c7inic parkina: "At least one (1) off-street
parking space shall be provided for each 150 sq. ft, of bui7ding floor area
for all medical and dental clinics."
Mr. Billings asked a6out chiropractic clinics? Should it 6e included along
with the medical and dental clinics? was their a definition for a medical
or dental cltnic?
Mr. Rofiinson stated Staff had discussed this. Rather than make a list of all
the clinics that should be included with medical and denial clinics, they
purposely had not included a definition so t�ey would not exclude anything.
��r. Robinson stated right now the code says that if a developer feels the
City's parking code is too restrictive, the develo�er does not have to put all
the parking stalls in, but the developer does have to leave enough green space
so that the option is always there to add more parking if it is needed.
P�r. Betzold suggested �hey use the term "health care clinics". This would
encompass all medical, dental, chiropractic, chemical depende�cy, patients'
services clinics, counse7ing services clinics, etc.
Mr. Robertson stated he thought IMr.Betzold's suggestion was a good one.
n It t�as the concensus of the Planning Commission mem6ers to approve the
recommended changes made 6y Staff, 6ut that City Staff and the City Attorney
review the ordinance with the suggestion tfiat 'health care c7inics" or some
other generic term be inserted in place of"medical and dental clinics".
,�"°� PLANNIfJG COP1N1ISSION h1EETING, JANf1ARY 7, 1987 PAGE 5
3. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
S I R A ES 0� CFIES :
Mr. Robinson stated S�aff was recommending that the following wording be
added to the ordinance in R-1, R�2, and R�3 zoning relating to parking
requirements for churches and private schools:
(a� Bullding and site requirements and performance standards shall
be equal to or greater tFian tClose outlined in the CR 1 section
of t�ie code �2Q5.16.3, 205.16.4, 205,16.G, and 205,16.7�.
�6�� A parking requirement of at least one (1) off street parking space
shall be provided for ;every three (3) fixed seats or for every
five (5� feet of pew length in �the main assembly hall. Additional
parking may be required� for additional church activities,such as
day care, classroom and recreational activities.
MOTION BY M5. SHEREK, SE�OIl1DED BY.MR. BETZOLD, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
�PPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE CHANGES RELATING TO CHURCHES A5 PROPO5ED BY 5TAFF.
UpON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
� 4. UPDATE OPJ THE U�IIVERSITY AVENUE CORRIDOR PROJECT:
Mr. Robinson stated that at the Dec. 11, 1986, HRA meeting, the HRA agreed to
go along with funding for the University Avenue Corridor project in the
amount of $1.4 million, ThTS included three camponents:
1. The complete reforestation as outllned 6y the consultants.
2. A lighting scfieme which included the University Ave. intersection
lighting and coordinated corrmiercial frontage road lighting -
approx. $400,000,
3. Intersection improvements for the 11 intersections from 58th Ave.
to 85th Ave. - approx. $500,000.
Mr. Ro6inson explained tF�e lig�.ting and intersection improvments cor�ponents
in more detail,
Mr. Robinson stated this was a start and more could always be done at a later
time. Some of the things not included in the $1.4 million was the wrought
iron fencing, monumentation, black vinyl fencing, etc.
Mr. Robinson stated this proposal would be going to the City Council at their
next conference meeting. 4-dith the City Council's approval, the next steps
would be to prepare detail 6ase maps, do a little more desiqn development on
the intersections, and then do the actual working drawings to implemer�t phase
� ���� the Spring.
�"'� PLANNING COI�P�ISSION ��1EETING; JANUARY 7; 1987 PAGE 6
Mr. Kondrick expressed his displeasure with the appearance of the chain link
fencing along University Avenue. He stated the fencinc� looks terrible.
Other communities do not have �Fencing like this, and he thought the fencing
should be removed.
Mr. Robinson stated it was t(Ze consultan�tss, and the TAC's recommend�tion to take
the fencing out from T�ississippi to 57th Ave. on the east side, 6ut to leave
it up along tFie residential areas. Tt has Ceen pointed out that the City
would 6e incurring lia6ility for any [cind of accident that might occur if
the fencing was removed.
Mr.Sa6a stated he would be in favor of berming or shrubbery in place of the
fencing.
Mr. Robertson sated that in some places there would not be enough room for
berming and shru66ery.
Mr. Robinson stated part of the Staff's recommendation was to take the fencing
down in phases on the east side between 57th Avenue and Mississippi Street.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� 5ECONDED BY MR..BE2'ZOLD, TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY
COUNCIL THAT THE FENCING BE REMOVED ON BOTH SIDES OF UNIVER52TP AVENUE OVER
^ A THREE YEAR PHASING PROGRAM AS RECOMI�7ENDED BY STAFF AND THAT BERMING AND
LANDSCAPING BE PUT IN WNEREVER PO5SIBLE.
UPON A I70ICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED 2'HE MOTION
CAFdRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO APPROVE OF THE AMENDMENTS
MADE BY STAFF AND THE HRA IN TERMS OF FUNDING FOR TIiE UNIVE.i�5ITY AVENUE
CORRIDOR PROJECT.
UpON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY.
Mr. Robertson stated that Staff has been consodering codifying a lot of the
desi n standards (such as brick, street lighting, appropr.i=a�e ]andscaping,
etc.� and putting togetFier a 600�C of design standards they would update and
add to periodically that could be given to developers who come in asking for
information on landscaping or to the County or to P1nDOT. He stated when the
draft of these design standards was completed, he would 6ring it to the
Planning Commission for their review.
Mr. Saba suggested that instead of ca7ling these "design standards" that
Staff come up with a little more catchy name or title.
5. RECEI�IE DECEMBER 2, 1986, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES:
n ,�� MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. 5VANDA, TO RECEI]'TE THE DEC. 2, 1986,
ENERGY COMMIS�SION MINUTES.
n PLANNING COhM1ISSI0N MEETING, JANUARY 7; 1987 PAGE 7
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN� AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UIVANIMOUSLY.
6. RECEIVE DECEMBER 4, 1986, HUMAN RESOURCES COP�MISSION h1INUTES:
MOZ'IOIV BY MS. SHEREK, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO .RECEIVF. DEC. 4, Z986�
HiTr?AN RESOURCES CQMMISSION MINUT�S. •%
UPOIV A T70ICE VOTE� ALL VOTING' AXSE,, CI�AIRPERSON BILL2lVGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUS'LY.
7. RECEIVE DECEMBER 11, ]986, HOUSING & REDEVELOPNIENT Af1THORITY MINUTES:
MOTIOIU BY MR. KONDRICK, 5ECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO RECEIVE THE DEC. 11, 1986,
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTSORITY MINU2'�'S. �
�,-
- UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL I10TING AYE� CHAIRPERSON B,L��INGS DECLARED THF. MOTION
CARRIED Ul1TA1VIMOUSLY.
8. RECEIVE DECEMBER 16, 1986, ENIIIRONMENTAC QUALITY CONI�9ISSIOPd MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. SIIANDA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE DEC. 16, I986.o
� ENTI2RONMENTAL QUALITY.CQMMISSION MINUTES.
_y- . .
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTTN� AY`E� CFIAI.RPERSON BILLIN�S DECL7lRED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. • � ,; : -
9. RECEIVE DECEMBER 29, 1986, SPECIAL ENERGY C0�IMISSION P�1INUTES:
MOTION BY MR. SABA, 5ECONDED BY M5. SHEREK, TO RECEIVE THE DEC. 29, 1986,
SPECIAL ENERGY COMMIS5ION MINUTE5.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAI.RPERSON BILLIIVGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10. RECEIVE DECEMBER 16, 1986, APPEACS COP�MISSION MINUTES:
M02'ION BY MR. BE�'ZOLD,�CONDID ffi^.1e1S. SIiEREK� TO RECElVE THE DEC. Z6� 1986,
APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES.
Mr. Betzold stated t6at at their Dec. 16th meeting, tC1ey fiad a request for
variances for the piece of property just_south of I-694 on 7th St. Right
now there is a large billboard, a brick building, and a garage on the lot.
The brick building has not been used for some time, and as pointed out at
the Appeals Commis�ion meeting, the lot was owned by Naegele and the lot was
more valuable to Naegele because of the billboard.
^ Mr. 6etzo]d stated that historically, when I-694 was Old Highway 100, that
building was apparently an old general store which was an ideal location for it.
That was why this lot and the ]ot to the west were zoned C-1. In order to
n PLANNING COMMISSION QIEETING, JANUARY 7, 1987 PAGE 8
grant the variances, this would mean a certain amount of improvements being
made to the 7ot and would proba6ly mean the 1ot would stay zoned C-1.
Whatever is done on this lot wi17 probably affect what happens on the vacant
]ot to the west, T[Ze suggestion �►as presented that m�ybe this lot could be
zoned RR3, multi le dwe7ling. TFie property might also he afiected by the
�dk-e Pointe Deve�opment across t6_e road on the ot�ier side of T�694.
Mr. Betzold stated tFie petitioner would 11ke to get into this building as soon
as poss161e and would 6�ve preferred to have tFie variances go directly to the
City Council. The Appea7s Cormnission was uncomfortable with that and felt
ii should go through the Planning �ommission for its ipput.
Mr. Robinson stated Mr. Clark had pointed out thai the lot to the west, althouqh
it had street�.access with t6e City right-of-way, there wer e no utilities to
the site at thts tlme. Mlr. Nedegaard, who owned the 7ot to the west, has
tried in the past to wor[� out a deal with Naegele, but as pointed out by
Mr. Betzold, the sign was worth more to Naegele than the lot.
P9r. Ro6inson stated that in order to put in an apartment building, the bill-
board would have to be removed. The cost of removing the billboard was
approximately $50,000. The cost of the property was $40,000-50,000 which
would kill any kind of a deal between the two property owners for an apartment
� complex.
Mr. Robinson stated in a conversation r�ith Staff the day before, they felt
the overflow effect of the Lake Pointe Corparate Center could very well have
some very strong implications on this lot and for the four run-down apartment
bu�ldings just south of this lot on 7th St. Also zncluded in this block were
a cemetery and a marglnal par[cing lot. Staff felt the City might want to
keep their options open at this time and allow the petitioner to fix up the
building,make some improvements to the lot, and make some use of the lot right
now. lie personally did not feel the site was a very good one for more
residential.
M1r. Robertson stated may6e the Planning Cononission s�iould start thin[�ing about
this whole area around the Lake Pointe deve7opment area as fcind of a transition
area and start looking at some long range, rather than piecemeal, policies
as to what they would like to see done.
Mr. Saba asked if this area had ever been considered by the HRA to be included
in a redevelopment district.
h1r. Robinson stated that their meeting on Thursday, Jan. 8, the HRA would be
looking at a proposal to include more property along the University Avenue
Corridor into a redevelopment district. Maybe this area should be included
in that proposal.
Mr. Saba stated he thought this whole block on 7th St. between 54th Ave. and
^ I-694 should be included in a redevelopment district.
�"� PLANNING CON��1ISSION MEETIPdG; JANUARY 7; 1987 � PAGE 9
Mr. Betzold stated one thing he felt they had to consider was that if these
variances were granted, was this consistent with the long range planning of
the City? The Appeals Cor�nission was concerned that if they alloaied
these variances to 6e granted and deve7opment to continue if it meant that
tFie adjacent lot would never be used. But, if it was the long range planning
of the City that 6oth of these lots might �ave some future use as commercia7
lots, then they should grant tF�e variances and allow the 6usiness to operate.
Mr. Bil7ings stated he wondered if they rea?ly wanted to have a business on a
small lot that c7ose to the street.
Ms. Sherek stated the rest of tfiis 6locfc �tas �lighied any�ray, and lettin�
someone improve the 7ot and run a business was not going to ma[ce the b7ight
any worse.
Mr. Bil7tngs stated Fie real7y did not �rant the structure to remain on the
lot. He stated even if t�iere are some facade improvements, the building was
still in pretty bad shape. If they grant the variances, that huilding could
stay on the 7ot forever, assuming it doesn't get acquired through condemnation
at some point in time. If tC1e City wou7d like to see that building condemned
and removed in 5�-6 years, why grant the variances and allov� a property owner
to collect rent on a 6uilding tFiat was an eyesore?
^ Ms. Sherek stated the City of Minneapo7is can require a property owner to
tear down a building that has been sitting boarded and vacant for two years.
That w�sn`t even limited to properties that were tax forfeit propertTes.
Mr. Ro6inson stated that in order to condemn a bui7ding, they have to prove
it is a health or safety hazard.
Mr. Betzold stated what he was hearing from Staff was that they could foresee
some increment districts being created on this property. If that was the
situation, it did not make much sense for them to al7ow tFie petitioner to make
some improvements to the property, simply to turn around and pay more for the
property to 6uy it bacfc in order to Fiave the property redeveloped.
Mr. Bil7ings stated (Ze fe7t the Commissioners were in agreement that approving
th.e variances and allowinq the property to be improved at this time was not it�
the long range p7an for th1� area.
Mr. Betzold stated improving the property did cut out too many options. The
City would end up.paying for the improvements to the pv�operty and the
relocation expenses.
UPOIU A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MINUTES RECEIVED.
� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 7, 1987 PAGE 1�
MO�iON BY MR. ST'ANDA� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, THAT SINCE THE HRA WILL BE
LOOKING AT INCLUDING THE Si1BJECT PROPERTY IN A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THE
PLANNING COMMIS5ION WOULD RECOMMEND THAT VARIANCE REQUE5T, VAR #86-35, BY
SPRAYER 5UPPLY, INC., BE DELAYED UNTIL 5TAFF COMES BACK TO THE PT�ANNSNG
COMMI5SION WITH MORE INFORMATION.
UPON A I702�E VOTE, AZL VOTING AY`E � CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED TIiE MOTIOIV
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED SY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO THE HRA THAT
THE NRA GIVE 5ERIOUS CONSIDERATION TO INCLUDING 2"HE WHOLE BLOCK ALONG 7TH
STREET BETWEEN 54TH AVEIITUE APID I�694 IN THE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSOIV BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTIOIV
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Robertson stated the initial idea was to include parcels that were part
of the University Avenue Corridor. Then, in thinking about it further, Staff
realized that if they go this far, they are not only going to impact the
University Ave. Corridor, but also the Lake Pointe Corporate Center. He agreed
�tit[� the Commission tha� the v��.ole area, including the apartment 6ui7dings
and Eemetery, shou7d 6e included in order to 6e consistent. He stated he
r--� would 6ring this up at the next HRA mee�fng.
ADJOURNMENT:
MQTION BY MR. SABA, 5ECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A
�702CE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N BILLIIVG5 DECLARED 2'HE JANUARY 7� 1987,
PLANNING COMMI55ION MEETING ADJOURNED AT I0:05 p.M.
Respectfully submitted,
��
Lyn Saba
Recording Secretary
�