PL 02/25/1987 - 30658�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMh1ISSI0N MEETING, F�BRUARY 25, 1987
CALL TO ORDE.R:
Chairperson Billings call�d� the February 25, 1987, Planning Corrunission meeting
to order at 7:32 p.m,
ROLL GALL:
Mer�bers Present: Steve Billings, Dave Kondrick, Sue Sherek, Donald Betzold,
Dale Thompson, Bruce Bondow
Mer�bers Absent: None
Ot{�ers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Duane Waldoch, 1655 - 75th Ave. N.E.
Debra K. Page, 4200 IDS Center, P�pls.
Olga Palmer, 1329 Gardena Ave.
Gay Minear, 1291 Gardena Ave.
Helfride Manning, 1315 Hillcrest Dr.
^ APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 11, 1987, PLAPJNING COMMISSION P�INUTES:
�
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO APPROVE THE FEB. 11� 1987,
PTIANNING COMMISSION MINUTE5 AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSOIV BILLINGS DECLARED THE M02'ION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. TABLED 2/11/87: PUBLIC HEARIIVG: CONSI
SP 87-01, BY EDWARD A ROSE ALDOCH:
IOId OF A SPECIAL USE PEW'9IT
Per Section 205.13.1, C, 9, of t—he Fridley City Code to allow exterior
storage of materials and equipment on the east 125 feet of Lot 18, Block 2,
Central View Manor, the same being 7340 Central Avenue N.E.
MOZ'ION BY R?R. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLII.e TO REMOVE THE ITEM FROM
THE TABLE.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAI.RPERSON BILLING5 DECLA.RED THE
MOTION CARRIED.UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, T� REOPEN THE PUBLIC
HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERS0111 BILLINGS DECTIARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING REOPE111ED AT %:34 P.M.
� PLANNIPdG CONWIISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 PAGE 2
Mr. Robinson stated that, as stated at�the last meeting, the property was
located west of Old Central between 73rd Ave. and 732 Ave. The zoning was
C-1. There was presently three uses for the property: single family home,
a repair garage, and storage for a lawn repair & equipment business.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff has proposed a� ntttnber of impr�v�ments for the
property. �e reviewed tMe stipulations recommended by Staff:
1. Provide an 8 ft. high solid wood scr-�ening fence as per City plan dated
Feb. 11, 1987, by May 15, 1987.
2. All materials to be stored inside the fenced sto�age area below the top
of the fence by May 15, 1987.
3. Install landscaping as per City plan dated Feb. 11, 1987, to include
edging, mulch, weed barrier, and lawn sprinkling by June 15, 1987.
4. Sod boulevard areas along Central �venue, 73rd Avenue, and 732 Avenue,
as per City plan dated Feb. ll, 1987, by June 15, 1987.
5. Repaint building facade and trim by June 15, 1987.
6. Provide 6 inch concret� curbing as per City plan dated Feb. 11, 1987,
� by June 15, 1987.
7. Remove concrete island from parking lot by June 15, 1987.
8. Repave and stripe parking lot and driveways by September 15, 1937.
9. Provide a performance bond or a letter of credit in the amount of $5,000
to cover all of the above stipulations prior to Council approval.
10. Parking or storage of street inoperable and/or unlicensed vehicles is
prohibited.
11. Parking of vehicles within street right-of-ways is prohibited - violators
will be tagged and/or towed within ten days. Date of possible action
is Feb. 23, 1987.
12. No sales or leasing of vehicles is or will be permitted on this site.
13. Special Use �ermit SP #87-01 for outside storage for lawn care operation
only and is intend�d�for presen���owners only and fs rrot transferrable to
future owners.
14. Special Use Permit to be reviewed in six months.
Ms. Sherek asked if Staff had met with the petitioner since the last Planni�g
� Commiss�on meeting.
PL�4NfVIPdG COMP�ISSION. M�FI�NG., FEBIt1FARY 25, 1987 PAGE 3
Mr. Robir�son stated the petitioner and hi�s legal counsel did c#iscuss the
proposal with City Staff the previous Friday. He believed the petitioner
and his legal counsel had some suggestions to the stipu]ations� and the plan
which they would like to present to the Commission.
Ms. �ebra Page stated she was an attorney representing P1r. Waldoch regarding
this special use permit. She stated she had rr�t wi_th Mr. Rnhinson and
several members of City �Staff the previ ous Fri day ta r��s`cuss a few of the
problems they are encounter�ing vrith �he site plan, and they did talk about a
few amendments to the site plan at that time. Since that meeting, the
petitioner has had some other concerns.
Ms. Page stated it was her understanding that at the last meeting, there was
some discussion that the six parking stalls pro�osed by Staff be extended
to include two additional stalls. In the meeting with P�r. Ro6inson on Friday,
Mr. Robinson had said they could probably extend that to three additional
stalls for a total of ni�ne parking stalls.
Ms. Page stated another�item discussed with Staff was to run a fence alangside
the co'mmercial building on the northwest side north to the prope�^ty line so
it would match up with the existing fence for Sam's Repair Shop in order to
make the storage area more usable for her client.
� Ms. Page stated Mr. Robinson had suggested the elimination of some curbing
at the last Planning Commission meeting also.
Ms. Page stated the last item discussed with Staff was allowing the storage
area for the lawn maintenance vehicles to be used for more than just the lawn
maintenance vehicles. She stated she understood the City Council would have
the final decision on this, but she would request that the Planning Corrmtission
makes its recomrrrendat-ion to allow that area to be used for the use of vehicles
which might be under repair from Sam's Repair Shop. She stated she did not
want to get involved with any licensing issues with the neighboring property,
but•if parking was going to he.diminished in the front, there would need to
be some additional space in the rear to park some of the vehicl�s that would
be part of the commercial use Tn th� repa°ir shop.
Ms. Page stated it was her understanding after their meeting on Friday that
Staff ctict not have a problem with these particular items.
Ms. Page stated that since the meeting, her client has had a chance to do a
little more work on the property, and one of the problems they have was that
when the parking was brought to the property line and taken off the County
right-of-way, there was not sufficient space between either the garage and
the edge of the parking or the entrance way to the fenced area to allow
turn-arour�d space for the lawn maintenance vehicles. Because that space
was not sufficient enough for� her client's use, she had taken the liberty of
contacting the Anoka County Attorney's Office about the possibility of
� acquiring a license to expand the parking area onto the Cour�ty right-of-way.
She stated the County Attorney's Office was not able to find out
before this Planning Commission meeting whether or not a license would be
available.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 PAGE 4
��
Ms. Page stated that if they were to get a license from the County to park
on County right-of-way, they would request that the parking be expanded an
additional 12-13 feet to allow sufficient use of the driveway for tbe parking
of her client's 1`awn maintenance equipment and also any commercial use of
getting into the garage.
Ms. Page stated Dan Clint of the County Attorney's Office was the attorney
who was following up on this matter. S.he hoped to ha,�e a:more definite answer
by Thursday or Friday. As she understood it, the issue that was holding up
the decision on the license was the County wanted to make sure there were no
limitations or other restrictions the� might want to put on that license.
Ms. Page s�ated that if the County turns down their request for a license for
parking on County right-of-way, the special use permit then daes not do her
client any good because they c�annot use the pro�erty under the limitations
being put on it. She stated her client does want to be able to conform and
make improvements, but the problem was if they are applying for a special use
permit that effectively prohibits the use (storage of materials and equipment
for t�e lawn �epair busi�ess), then it would be her recomme�dation to
Mr. Waldoch that he withdraw the special use permit application.
Ms. Page stated her client's second request was that they be allowed to pave
the area west of the easterly driveway (north of Sam's Repair Shop) to allow
^ movement through there and for access to the back area.
Mr. Waldoch stated the reason for that was when there are cars that have to
be repaired and have to be stored in the back and have to be pushed to the
back area, they have to go out on the main street to get access to the back.
Also, with the little hill and with snow and ice, it would be pretty hard to
do in the wintertime. He was just looking for some flat ground to that back
area whicti� would be more convenient and would cause less problems for getting
cars from the parking area in front to the back area.
Ms. Sherek stated she lived in this neighborhood, and there was a lot of
traffic congestion on 732 Ave. during the day. Pushing disabled cars around
woul d eer�tai nly -t�ake��-��C�i��ys worse. -
Ms. Page stated- the existing�fence was 6 ft. high, and Staff was requesting
an 8 ft. fence. Was there a reason for the 2 ft, increase?
Mr. Robinson stated some of the trucks are far in excess of 6 ft., especially
the piggyback trucks with cars on the top.
Ms. Page state� regarding stipulation #8, was it necessary ta repave the
whole parking lot and driveways, or could they just repair and sealcoat
those areas that needed it? This was strictly a financial concern.
Mr. Robinson stated it would depend on the condition of the driveways and
�--, parking lot. Whatever was reasonable and functional, and that could be
determined by the city engineers.
� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 PAGE 5
�
Mr. Waldoch stated that the distance between the commercial garage and the
parking area as proposed by Staff was 22 ft. He stated that with a 22 ft.
full-sized car parked in the parking area, access into and out of the commer-
cial garage was very difficult.
Mr. Robinson suggested that Mr. Waldoch swap storage areas with Sam's Repair
Shop, so that Mr. Waldoch could use the 732 Ave. entrance to get his lawn
maintenance vehicles to the small��arage in the back.
Mr. Waldoch stated if that was done, he would not have a lawn maintenance
business, bec��se the repair of lawn equipment, etc., was done in the small
garage and access to the small garage was to the west.
Mr. Waldoch presented a landscaping design he had put together that he
thought was feasible for the property.
Mr. Robinson stated th�at if the County allowed the license for parking on
the right-of-way, it would be setting a precedent for other businesses that
would like to use ihe boulevard for parking. Right now it �as being done
and it has been overlooked in the past, but he did not think the City wanted
to condone such an action. He sympathized with some of the problems the
petitioner was having, but he felt the main problem stemmed from the fact
that the petitioner was trying to do too much with the property. He was not
sure if that was the City's hardship and whe#th�^ the City should accommodate
him beyond what were reasonable and allowable solutions.
Ms. Sherek stated she still felt they were looking at this from the wrong
angle.. She stated Sam has got junk all over that piece of property. The
City Council has said that Sa� is not allowed to have junk the�e. Right now
there are two flatbed trucks with junk car parts on them, one has been there
since last Saturday and one for at least two weeks, and junk car parts out on
property that his license says he cannot use for his junk business. There
was also a t�r truck parked there, which could be argued that it �ould be for
either business. But, she felt that instead of taki'�g a 7ot of time discussing
this with P1r. Waldoch and Ms. Page, this whole thing should be before the
City Council where Sam is violating his license with the City.
Mr. Kondrick stated that was true, but he also agreed with Mr. Robinson
that there was too much going on on this piece of property.
Mr. Waldoch stated he did not feelthey were overusing the property}
Mr. Billings stated he would like to express his displeasure over the fact
that the petitioner and his legal counsel were coming before the Planning
Commission with all these ne� id�as. At the last meeting, he had indicated
to P�r. Waldoch that he should get together with his attorney right away and
then meet with City Staff as soon as possible io negotiate and come back to
the Planning Commission with a pretty much agreed-upon plan, As he under-
,-�, stood it, the petitioner and his attorney did not get together with Staff
until last Friday, and then that did not allow enough time to get the �things
� PLANNIP�G COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 PAGE 6
done that needed to be done before the Planning Commission meeting. Now,
the petitioner was at the meeting with a proposal that was contingent upon
some outside sources. He did not want to see this special use permit request
dragged on any further, but he did not know if the Planning Commission would
be able to resolve anything a t this meeting.
Ms. Page��p��o�i�d f�� any delay they have caused the Commission. Since the
meeting on Friday with City Staff, they have been trying to work within what
Staff had given them, and she �ad then initiated contacts with the County
Attorney's Office. She assured the Commission members she felt they have now
flushed out all the issues, and it �nras s��imply a matter of putting them
together. She did not think they could have moved any faster than they did.
Any recommendation from the Cammission woul-d have to be contingent upon wait-
ing to hear from the County on whether or not they can get the license.
Mr. Billings suggested the small garage be moved so that access fram the
garage was to the north instead of to the east. He stated the tv� biggest
problems seemed to be: (1) pulling out of the commercial garage with a full-
sized vehicle and trying to make the turn into the dri�tew��+; and (2) bacE;ing
vehicles into the storage area to the small garage. He stated right now they
. are looking at the site as it exists and trying to see how they can make it
all wark within the confines of the site as it now exists, as opposed to
trying to enlarge the site to make it work.
�'�
Mr. Billings stated he did not want it misconstrued that if the City does
issue a special use permit for outdoor storage for lawn equipment that they
are endorsing the outdoor storage of vehicles for the junk yard.
Ms. Page stated when they met with Staff on Friday, they were in agreement
with whatever definition was needed in the special use permit to distinguish
between the junk cars and the repair garage.
M_r. Robinson sugg.ested they leave the ffirst three diagonal
spaces and after that point go to a parallel parking situation where they
could fit in four more stalls for a total of seven stalls. That wouid give
the petitTOner about 30 ft. of width for truck and trailers to come back into
the storage area. The gate to that storage area could be made as wide as
the petitioner needed. The only problem with this suggestion, of course,
was the petitioner would not get nine stalls, but he would get one more
than was originally suggested by Staff which was six stalls.
Mr. Waldoch stated that plan sounded feasible.
Mr. Billings stated he did have some philosophical problems with receiving
a license from the County for parking on the right-of-way. It was a policy
the City has not had in the past, and he thought it was a policy that would
require quite a bit of discussion and thought, especially on i�is part, before
^ a decision could be made. It could be setting a very dangerous precedent for
other business owners in similar situations.
� PLANNIfJG COMP4ISSIdN MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 PAGE 7
Ms. Sher�k stated the petitioner should keep in mind that if the right-of-
way �nded at the curb line of Old Central, the required setback would be
20 ft., so to request 12-13 ft. in a license from the County, the petitioner
was requesting not only to use the right-of-way which was.a variance in and
of itself, but was requesting to park closer to th� curbline than the
�llowed-setback requirements. She suggested,the petitioner give some
serious thoug.ht to P�r. Billings' suggestion that he check inta the possibility
af using the area behin� the commercial garage as a way ta back into the
smalle� garage, whether it meant turning.the garage, p�tt'ing up a poleshed
instead of the garage, or whatever. She would also �uggest that a fence be
run from the southwest end of the commercial garage, south to the existing
fence line. The lawn service business could use the storage area west of the
commercial business, and Sam could use the storage area south of the commer-
cial building.
Mr. Waldoch stated the storage area behind the commercial building was
approx�mately 3y7�5� sq. ft, while th� �rea south of the comm�rcial building
was only about 1,750 sq. ft. Sam would have less storage area, and that
could affect things in �erms of rent.
Mr. Billings stated that in loaking at one of the alternatives the petitioner
had requested that a�f�nce be installed from the northwest corner of the
�' commercial building north to the property line and then paving that entire
area, he thought that was something that might be feasible. But, if the
south side of the cammercial building was utilized for storage by Sam instead
of the back area (as suggested �y Ms. Sherek), then the cars could be moved
into there from the parking lot and fron� driveway and the paved area to the
north would �o� be neede�, leaving more�green space.
Mr. Robinson stated the Commission a�� S�aff have explored several feasible
so�utions for the site, and h� thnught it was time for the Commission to
make some recommendations.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:36 P.M.
Mr. Betzold stated that regarding the issue about the County right-of-way
and whether or not they should approve the use of County right-of-way for
parki ng i f the Cour�ty woul d approve a 1 i cense, he di d not thi nic he coul d go
along with that. They have done a pretty good job in the City in cleaning
up some of these areas in the last few years, and approving the use of
County right-of-way for parking would be a step backward, As was indicated
by ��r. Robinson, there was sure to be a lot-of other businesses that were
going to come in requesting the very same thing. He felt legally the City
would be on pr�tty solid ground if they said "no" to allowing use of the
�, right-of-way. He would recommend a stipulation that the City Council deny
the use of the right-of-way for parking.
� PLANNIPJG COr�'�IISSION. MEETING, FEBRUAl�Y 25, 1987 - PAGE 8
Mr. Thompson agreed. He stated he did not think the City should allow the
petitioner to park on County right-of-v�ay. The Staff has already compromised
in allowing the petitioner to park right up to the proper�ty line.
Ms. Sherek agreed also. She looked at the American Legion Club right across
the street as a good example of another business that needed additional
parking and would love to be able to push its parking closer to the street.
The aim of the City has been to buffer parking lots from the street with
landscaping, and this would definitely be a step backwards.
Mr. Kondrick agreed also. He felt a number of things could be done with the
property, both for the tenant and for the petitioner. But, to go any further
tharr what was recommended wnuld be a step backwards and would be setting a
precedent.
Mr. Billings asked about the additional stalls on the east side.
Mr. Kondrick stated he thought Mr. �obinson's: suggestion about the three
di:agonal and four parallel stalls was a reasonable alternative. However, he
would offer another suggestion and that was to change it around and put
four parallel stalls on the north and then three diagonal. That would leave
more room for maneuvering cars in and out of the commercial garage into the
,,,� parki ng 1 ot.
Mr. Billings stated he would recommend they add up to 30 additional feet
for parking along the right-of-way line with the striping to be appro�ed by
Staff.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #B7—01, BY EDW.�2D AND ROSE WALDOCH, PER
SECTION 205.13.1, C, 9, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOW EXTERIDR STORAGE
OF MATERIAL5 AND EQUIPMENT ON Z'HE EAST 125 FEET OF LOT 18, BLOCK 2� CENTRAL
VIEW MANOR, THE SAME BEING 7340 CENTRAL AVENUE N,E. 5UBJECT TO TSE AMENDED
SITE PLAN AS OUTLINED BY STAFF AND SUB�T�C1' 2'O THE FOLL�IGO�`RTG 5TIPULATIONS:
1. PROVIDE AN B FT. HIGH SOLID WOOD SCREENING_FENCE AS FER:CTTY::PLAN
DATED FEB. 11, 1987,AND AMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION� BY MAY I5, 1987.
2. ALL NIATERIAIS TO BE STORED IINSIDE THE FENCED STORAGE ARE BELOW
TNE TOP OF TNE FENCE BY i�?AY 15, 1987 a
3. IIVSTALL LANDSCAPING AS PER CITY PLAN DATED FE�. ZZ, 1987, �'O"2NCLUDE
EDGING, MULCH, WEED BA.RR:ZER, AND LAWN SPRINKLING BY JUNE l5, 1987.
4. SOD BOULEVARD AREAS AIANG CENTRAL AVENUE, 73.RD AVENUE AND 73� AVENUE
A5 P�R CITY PLAN DATED FEB. 11, 1987, BY JUNE 15, 1987.
5. REPAINT BUILDING FACA1?E AND TRIM BY JUNE I5, 1987.
6. PROVIDE 6 INCH CONCI4ETE CURBSNG A5 PER CITY P�AN DATED FEB. 11, 1987,
AND AMENDED BY PLANNING COMMI5SIOIV, BY Jifi1E I5, 1987.
7. REMOVE CONCRETE ISLAND FROM PARKING LOT BY JUNE 15, 1987.
8. REFU.RBISH PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAYS TO CITY ENGINEERS� SPECIFICATIONS
AND STRIPE PARKING LOT WITHIN THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OIJ�' OF THE COUNTY
�, RIGIiZ'—OF—WAY BY 5EPT. I5, 1987.
� PLANNIPJG COPIMISSION P1EETSNG, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 PAGE 9
9. PROVIDE A PERFORM1dNCE BDND OR A LETTER QF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF
$5,000 TD CQVER ALL OF Z'HE ABOVE STIPULATIONS PRIOR Z'O COUNCIL
APPROVAL.
10. PARKING OR STORAGE OF STREET INOPERA�`L-E' A11iD/OR UNLICEN5ED VEHICLES
IS PROHIBITED.
11. PARKING OF VEHICLES WITHIN STREET RIGHZ'-0E—WAYS IS PROHIBITED —
VIOLATORS WILL BE:TAGGED AND/OR TOWED.
12. NO SALES OR LEASING OF VEHICLES IS OR WILL BE PERMITTEIZ ON THIS SITE.
13. SPECIAL U5E PERMIT, SP #87-01, FOR OUTSIDE S�'ORAGE.FOR LAWN CARE
OPERATIDIV ONLY AND I5 INTENDED FOR PFtESENT OWNERS OIVLY AND IS NOT
TRAN5FERRABLE TO FUTUFiE OWNERS.
14. 5PECIAL USE PERMIT TD BE REVIEWED IN SIX MONTHS.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY.
Mr. Billings stated this item would go to City Council on Flarch 9.
2. PUBLIC HE�RING: CONS_IDEI�TION .OE AN -QRDIN��IGE RECODTF`YIIJG CHAPTER 205 OF
l.L 11V11. I'HKK11Vla � l.t1UKl.t1tJ � HINU li/�KHlat Jt I tiNI.ICJ :
MOTION BY MS. SHEREK� 5ECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, 2'O OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHA�.RPERSON BILLINGS DEC7�IRED THE PUBLIC
HEARING OPEN AT 9:09 P.M.
Mr. Robinson stated these ordinance changes had been discussed previously by
the Planning Commission. IVQw, it was required that the Planning Commission
have a public hearing and recommend to City Council these amendments to the
City Code.
Mr. Robir�son reviewed with the Commission the revisions to �he ordinance.
MOTION BY MS. 5HEREK� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO CLO5E THE PUBLIG HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAI.RPER50N BILLINGS DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 9:15 P.M.
MOTION BY M5. SNEREK, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECOMMEND TO Cl2'Y COUNCIL
THE A�PTION OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE AS IT RELATES TO DUMPSTER ElUCL05URES, HEALTH CARE CLINIC PARKING,
CHURCHES, AND GARAGE SETBACKS.
UPON A VOICE.VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
�
,�
��
PLANNING COMMISSION MEE�ING, FEBRUA�Y 25, 198�7 PAGE 10
3a COPJSIDERATION OF ALTERING TNE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE
BI-MONTHLY LONG RANGE P ANNING MEETINGS:
Mr. Robinson stated that in the �genda was a memo he had written to.the Planning
Corrmmission members and City Council members dated Feb. 11, 1987, which
recommended to the City Council that the Planning Commission be authorized
to establish bi-monthly meetings at which time they would discuss long range
planning activities. The memo-f�rther established the framework whereby
the Corrmiission could address really pertinent issues facing the City and
set goals, identify solutions, and develop a workplan.
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. BET�QLD� THAT THE PLANNING COMMI5SION
CHAIRPERSON PRESENT THE MEMO DATED.FEB. 1I, 1987, FRQM JIM ROBIN50N, REGARDING
"PLANNING COMMISSION GDAL SEZ'2'.ZNG" TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AT THEIR
'COIVF`ERENCE °Nl�'�"1'TNG- O�T<�2ARCH 30, Z987.
UPON�A VOICE VOTE., ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPE.RSON BILLINGS DECLARED TNE MOTION
CARRIED UIVANIMOUSLY.
4. RECEIVE JANUARY� 8, 1987, HQUSING. & REDEIIELOPP�EN1` AUTHDRITY PIINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED.BY MS. 5HEREK� 2'O RECEIVE THE.JAN. 8� 1987,
HOU521UG & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZ'Y MIIVUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLING5 DECLARED THE MOTIDN
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 17, 1987, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTIOIW BY MR. HETZOLD, 5ECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE.FEB. 17, 1987,
APPEAIaS COMMISSION MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. OTHER BUSINESS:
Mr. Bandow repo�.ted_ tk��-t th� Communi ty Energy Counci 1 Grant Appl i cati on the
City submitted has been approved. It will cover residential energy code
compliance and education as well as some recycling in the amount of $15,000.
AUJOURNMENT:
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. BONDOW, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE FEB. 25, 1987,
PZANNING COMMISSION MEETING 7�DJOURNED AT 9:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
�''�
l��
Ly n Saba
Recording Secretary
� � � .
� �
� a.�; /��'`�
C��-�_
___.��
ti�- ������
��� �� ���c
� ���
�
� � �
i � � �
�
�',�`� ,��,
/� rs � s' �``� � �� ���� `�
�t�E� � �S ���� � �CS
��� �.���� �, .
��
,. r ,' � ,
/�/�S ��.�������� ;' �/�_
ss�c o �