PL 06/21/1989 - 30704�
�
��
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNIN�3 CONII�lI88ION MEETING� JIINE 21� 1989
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Betzold called the June 21, 1989, Planning Commission
meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Donald Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Sue Sherek, Alex
Barna, Richard Svanda
Members Absent: Dean Saba
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Charles Wood, Charles Wood Associates
Pat Dowd, Target
John Uban, Dahlgren, Shardlow, & Uban, Inc.
John Livingston, representing Ted Haines
APPROVAL OF JUNE 7. 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION MINiTTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to approve the June
7, 1989, Planning Commission minutes as written.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #89-10 BY TARGET
STORES. INC.: Per Section 205.18.O1.C.(12) of the Fridley
City Code, to allow exterior storage of materials and
equipment on Outlot 1, Block 1, Fridley Industrial Park Plat
1, Anoka County, Minnesota, together with the North Half of
the Southeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 30, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota; excepting the West 675 feet thereof;
including that portion of Able Street vacated or to be vacated
included in said North Half of the Southeast Quarter,
generally located at 1090 - 73rd Avenue N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Svanda, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CBAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY AND T8E PIIBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M.
� PLANNING COMMIBBION MEETING, JIINS 21, 1989 - PAGE 2
\
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a special use
permit on its site on 73rd Avenue. The area was reviewed using the
location and zoning maps. There is single family to the north and
Locke Park to the south. The area is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial.
The special use permit is to allow outside storage of trucks and
trailers, and in the future, pallet storage that will be used in
conjunction with the expansion of the warehouse facility. The
zoning code allows for outside storage with a special use permit.
The final landscape plan has been received, but the previous plan
that had been reviewed at previous meetings would be used to
illustrate the screening. There were several concerns received by
the residents in general regarding the service drive located
directly across from Jackson Street, and screening will be done so
it is not seen.
Ms. McPherson stated that as far as providing adequate screening
as directed by the zoning code, on the east side of the site,
Target is proposing to plant boulevard trees and vines on the
existing fence along the east side. Along north portion, Target
will reconstruct a wetland to replace the one that will be
destroyed by construction. On the amended site plan, there is a
second wetland and a detention pond that will handle and control
the run off from the parking lot and the building. In the 200 ft.
� buffer area, Target is planning to plant large deciduous trees and
evergreens 8-14 feet tall.
Ms . McPherson stated that along the west where the proposed bikeway
will be, Target is proposing to plant evergreens 8-14 feet tall.
Regarding the view from Locke Park, the petitioner is proposing to
plant Boston ivy along the building to help mask the building.
Staff recommends approval with the following stipulations:
1. No evergreens shall be planted after November 1, 1989 (or of
any planting season).
2. All plant materials used in the upland herbaceous, tall
meadow, short meadow, emergent mudflat, broad leaf marsh, and
floating categories shall be native to Central Minnesota.
Mr. Pat Dowd, Target, stated he had no comments. The proposal has
been presented in past meetings, the suggestions made have been
incorporated into the plans, Target has been working with the City
staff on vacating the street and other issues, and is in agreement
with staff.
Mr. Barna asked if storage will be during the construction period
or after.
,� Mr. Dowd replied storage will be after the construction of the
� facility.
,,� PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, JIINE 21, 1989 - PAGE 3
Mr. Barna asked what will be stored in this outside area.
Mr. Dowd stated that tractors, trailers, and pallets only will be
stored. Another storage area will be shielded by the service
building.
Mr. Barna asked if this storage would take place after the wetlands
are done.
Mr. Dowd stated the retention pond needs to be done right away.
There will be no storage until the paving is completed and the
building is ready for occupancy.
Mr. Kondrick asked if the tractor/trailers will be visible from
the streets.
Ms. McPherson stated they may be visible in winter because part of
the buffer is predominantly deciduous materials. The additional
evergreens will help to enhance this deciduous buffer area and
increase the screening. Until the evergreens reach a more mature
state than 14 feet, there may be some storage seen from the street
and bikeway.
Mr. Kondrick asked if the storage area to the west side of the site
!''� is level with Central Avenue.
Ms. McPherson thought that at this time the level may be higher.
However, they are proposing quite a bit of grading so it will
likely be at the same level or lower. Fortunately, along the south
side, there are a number of trees that are 15-20 feet tall that
will provide additional screening from the park.
Mr. Barna asked if the new plantings would be more dense than the
current plantings.
Ms. McPherson felt the new plantings would be at least as dense as
the current plantings. The evergreens along the storage area will
likely screen more so after maturity, either maintaining or
increasing screening.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE � ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:45 P.M.
Mr. Kondrick felt the staff has done a good job to ensure the area
is screened from view. He had no problem with the proposal.
,� Ms. Sherek stated that if the proposed screen is as dense as the
current screen the storage would not be noticed unless one drove
into the area.
�
�'`��
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING� JIINE 21. 1989 PAQE 4
MOTION by Mr. Svanda, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to the
City Council approval of the Special Use Permit, SP #89-10, by
Target Stores, Inc., per Section 205.18.O1.C.(12) of the Fridley
City Code, to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment on
Outlot l, Block 1, Fridley Industrial Park Plat 1, Anoka County,
Minnesota, together with the North Half of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 11, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota;
excepting the West 675 feet thereof; including that portion of Able
Street vacated or to be vacated included in said North Half of the
Southeast Quarter, generally located at 1090 - 73rd Avenue N.E.,
with the following stipulations:
1. No evergreens be planted after November 1, 1989.
2. All plant materials used in the upland herbaceous, tall
meadow, short meadow, emergent mudflat, broad leaf marsh,
and floating categories be native to Central Minnesota.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Mr. Betzold stated this item will go to City Council on July 10,
1989.
2. CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING ZOA #89-03 BY TED HAINES: To
rezone Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 from M-1, Light
Industrial, and R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2,
General Business, generally located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE � ALL VOTING AYE � CBAIRPERSON HETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTYON CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEld AT 7:50.
Ms. Dacy stated the facility is located on the southeast corner of
72nd Avenue and Hwy. 65. The property is zoned both M-1, light
industrial, and R-3, multiple family. The westerly half of the
site was zoned M-1 since 1958 and the east half has had a
residential zoning of either R-1 or R-3 since that time. In 1959
the Minnesota Door Company received a permit to build the existing
structure on the site. In 1984 Kurt Manufacturing, the current
owner, made several site and building improvements and received a
special use penait to use the R-3 portion of the lot as a parking
area.
Ms. Dacy stated
� parcel to C-2 t
and showroom in
including small
Mr. Ted Haines is requesting rezoning the entire
o enable him to establish a snowmobile dealership
the existing building. He is also looking at
water craft and motor cycle parts. The facility
;�
�,
PLANNING__COMMI88ION MEETIN(3. JIINE 21, 1989 PAGL 5
would employ
occupied for
square feet
shop.
6-8 persons. The majority of the building would be
a showroom, offices and storage area. About 3,000
of the building would be occupied by an embroidery
Ms. Dacy stated that from a zoning standpoint, this comes at a time
when the City is looking at existing uses in the area. Staff
recommends approval of the rezoning because, even though it may
appear on the map as a spot zone, the use of the adjacent
properties are commercial in nature and approval will work toward
keeping the area commercial. It also rectifies a split zoning
situation.
Ms. Dacy stated that as far as the site plan issue is concerned,
staff indicated some concern about the parking area. If staff uses
the parking space ratio for retail, the petitioner would need 71
spaces on site. If staff uses another ratio in the ordinance for
speculative commercial zoning, only 54 spaces are required and that
amount of parking exists on site. Based on the type of structure
and location, staff does not anticipate parking to be a problem.
The City Attorney recommended the stipulation included in the staff
report so that future tenants in the building shall not receive a
certificate of occupancy until it is shown that adequate parking
can be provided for the proposed use.
Mr. Haines plans to repaint, remodel, add a new facade treatment,
and add display windows along the front which staff feels would
improve the appearance. Staff is recommending approval of the
request with the one stipulation.
Mr. John Livingston attended the meeting as a representative of Mr.
Haines.
Mr. Kondrick asked if Mr. Haines planned to sell motorcycles at
this location.
Mr. Livingston stated he does not. The plan at this location is
to get out of the motorcycle business. The plan is to take the
best parts of what they have learned from his other location in
Forest Lake and Mr. Haines does not want to be involved in those
things that are "theft oriented". Sales would be primarily of
snowmobiles and, possibly, personalized water craft such as jet
skis.
Mr. Haines may provide some motorcycle parts but does not want to
have a motorcycle dealership. Mr. Haines is purchasing this site
in response to a contract with Polaris Snowmobiles. He did note
that he may, in the future, address the issue of water craft. If
� it should change, he will come back and talk to the commission.
Mr. Betzold asked what remodeling is being planned.
� PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETINa, JIINE 21. 1989 - PAGE 6
, , -
Mr. Livingston stated that roughly 120 feet in the front of the
building, and specifically the south half of the building, would
be remodeled to incorporate display windows. Mr. Haines also plans
to update the facade. When asked if the plan is to include
illuminated awnings, Mr. Livingston stated that this had been
discussed but he didn't know what was planned. The awnings give
visibility at night and makes the building less likely to be
tampered with.
Mr. Betzold asked about the parking and whether or not it would be
primarily in the back.
Mr. Livingston stated that Mr. Haines has the largest Polaris
dealership in the U.S. located in Forest Lake. He has done a count
of cars and the largest number has been 15 at their main
dealership. The Fridley location is considered a sub-dealership
and they do not anticipate any problem. The showroom will be
separate from the rest of the building. An access door will be put
in on the east for those who park in the rear.
Mr. Betzold asked if there is any long range plan to limit access
to Highway 65.
� Ms. Sherek indicated that 73 1/2 was presented for closure and the
plan is to close all left turns in the next 5 years.
Mr. Livingston stated the site is also close to the intersection
at 73rd.
Mr. Betzold wanted to make sure Mr. Haines is aware that there may
be changes in the future.
Mr. Livingston indicated Mr. Haines is aware of this. The site is
a place to which people drive.
Mr. Betzold asked if Mr. Haines will be erecting a sign.
Mr. Livingston indicated Mr. Haines does not know a sign can be
placed there. Mr. Haines' goal is to have a sign on the building,
but since he found out, he may pursue it but Mr. Livingston stated
he thought Mr. Haines would be conservative.
Mr. Barna asked staff if, in the future 72nd Avenue was closed, is
there adequate property between the site and Hwy. 65 for full cut
back road.
Ms. Dacy stated the first 40 feet is dedicated as easement for a
service road and 10 parking spaces back out on the existing service
� road.
Mr. Svanda asked what Kurt Manufacturing did at the site.
,,,� PLANNING COMMI68ION MEETINa, JIINB 21. 1989 - PAGE 7
Mr. Kondrick stated they were a metal fabricating company.
Mr. Svanda asked if there had been an environmental audit at the
site.
Ms. Sherek indicated an audit had been done and any recommended
clean up completed.
Mr. Barna asked if Mr. Haines was aware that there is no outside
storage.
Ms. Sherek stated that Crysteel just came in recently for showroom
and we have prohibited outside storage and probably will also
request that this not be done at this site.
Mr. Livingston stated this has been only mentioned. He did not
think Mr. Haines would do anything to jeopardize the Polaris
contract. If there are any changes, he will come back.
Mr. Betzold asked if they were aware of the parking problem. The
stipulation details the parking with regard to future tenants. The
parking is not there for a retail area.
�'� Mr. Barna asked if the other retail area was a part of the company.
,-�
Mr. Livingston stated this is a separate company with stitching
machines who do lettering on jackets. They are not related to the
motor sports business. To his knowledge they are a contract
business.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:10 P.M.
Mr. Kondrick felt that a motion to approve the request should
include a stipulation regarding outside storage.
Ms. Sherek agreed. Even though this tenant does not intend to
use outside storage, a future tenant may end up doing so.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend the
City Council approve the rezoning request, ZOA #89-02, by Ted
Haines, to rezone Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 from M-1,
Light Industrial, and R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2,
General Business, generally located at 7191 Highway 65 N.E.
with the following stipulations:
�:
� PLANNING COMMI88ION MSETING. JUNE 21, 1989 - PAGE 8
1. Future tenants in the building shall not receive a
certificate of occupancy until it is shown that adequate
parking can be provided for the proposed use.
2. There shall be no outside storage or display by the owner
and/or tenants.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED T8E
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY.
Mr. Betzold stated that on July 10th the City Council will set a
hearing date to discuss this request.
3. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV #89-03 BY THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY: To vacate that part of the north six feet of Outlot
1, Gena-Rae Addition lying within Tracts G and H of Registered
Land Survey No. 94 (except the west five feet of said Tract
H) and that part of the east one foot of the west six feet of
said Outlot 1 lying within Tracts H and I of Registered Land
Survey No. 94 (except north six feet of said Tract H)
Ms. McPherson referred to the June 7, 1989, memo from Mr. John
Flora and Mr. Clyde Moravetz regarding the history of the parcel.
�"`, The request is made to assist in clearing the title of the parcel.
The easements in question are located in the Gena Rae addition.
When the original plat was recorded, there were drainage and
utility easements established. The City condemned a portion for
a park and then decided it was not suitable for a park. The
Registered Land Survey #94 was recorded which allowed the recorded
easement for Creek Park Lane to occur. When the new subdivision
occurred, Creek Ridge, the City did not realize the easements
existed, and new drainage and utility easements were established.
These are no longer required so staff is recommending approval of
vacation of the easements.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend the
City Council approve Vacation, SAV #89-03 by the City of Fridley,
to vacate that part of the north six feet of Outlot 1, Gena-Rae
Addition lying within Tracts G and H of Registered Land Survey No.
94 (except the west five feet of said Tract H) and that part of the
east one foot of the west six feet of said Outlot 1 lying within
Tracts H and I of Registered Land Survey No. 94 (except north six
feet of said Tract H).
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII3LY.
� 4. REVIEW PROPOSAL BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT TO AMEND THE M-1
DISTRICT TO ALLOW CHURCHES
� PLANNING COMMIBSION MEETING� JIINE 21. 1989 - PAGE 9
Ms. Dacy presented the pros and cons of allowing churches in an M-
1 district. ,Advantages include:
1. It might be a cost effective alternative for small
churches as opposed to building a structure.
2. Parking will not conflict with the typical parking
situation of multi-tenant building.
3. It may remove some churches from residential area; and
4. The City could monitor the occupancy through special use
permits.
Ms. Dacy stated the disadvantages include:
1. It would be contrary to the intended use of the building
2. They would be occupying industrial space designed for
industrial use.
Ms. Dacy stated a number of communities were surveyed and the
majority require churches in a single family zone. Brooklyn Park
n permitted churches in industrial and found they were occupying too
much space. On the other hand, Minnetonka has had a good
experience and did issue a special use permit.
Ms. Dacy stated that despite the list of advantages, staff is
recommending that the district not be amended. If the Commission
does agree, there are five stipulations to permit churches:
1. They must be located within a multi-tenant building so
that a freestanding church cannot occupy industrial zoned
land.
2. A maximum percentage of building area should be
established.
3. A special use permit should be required to ensure that
parking and traffic activities do not conflict with other
uses on the site.
4. Requirements of the building code must be met.
5. The maximum square footage permitted for the retail uses
are 5,000 square feet. This proposed application is for
8,000 square feet, or approximately 10% of the University
Business Center. It is hard to rationalize permitting
^ a church use to have more square footage than what is
permitted for commercial uses.
�„� PLANNING COMMI88ION ME$TINa� JIINE 21. 1989 - PAGE 10
Mr. John Uban, Dahlgren, Shardlow, & Uban, Inc., stated that
churches are looking at industrial space because they are like a
business in that they start out small and grow, and they need
places to move to in order to grow. He has worked with many
churches before, both large and small, and has found that there is
a need for a sequence of housing for churches. Regional churches
are very large and have significant use at the highest level, and
are not suited for residential areas. In looking at the sequence
for churches to grow and be part of the community, industrial areas
are good because the intent would be for the church to be there for
3 to 5 years while they pursue a permanent home. Many churches
doing this are in the process of growing. An important thing is
the parking in industrial areas. It is convenient and is used
during off peak hours; and in a multi tenant building, the parking
lot can be vacant during their hours. Industry needs parking and
churches in the building improve the parking situation. This is
a good way to keep churches in the community. It can be good for
the community by allowing conditional use in an industrial area.
Mr. Uban stated the proposed building is located at 81st Avenue and
Highway 47, and has 80,000 square feet. The church would use about
8,000 square feet, half of which would be a worship service area
and the other half would be offices, storage, rest rooms,
�, counseling rooms, etc. The church has about 80 members at each
service. Another church in Grand Rapids grew from 3 to 300 in 4
to 6 years. He stated he felt it would work. The total space is
10% of the building and a reasonable amount to look at. It also
has good exposure to the public. The church needs to be blended
into the multi use concept. Oftentimes, day care centers are in
complexes such as this. There is a lot of industrial space that
is not developed in the area and don't think this is a significant
number of square feet. He felt the City could be assured of
reasonable responsibility of behavior by the church. This does not
happen very often. He was sure the conditions listed address many
of the concerns they have come across before, and he felt it will
help the community as well as helping the church.
Mr. Betzold asked if anyone would be living on site.
Mr. Uban stated no one would be living at the site.
Mr. Betzold asked if services would only be on weekends and nights.
Mr. Uban stated this is what he understood, but they do some
counseling when it is convenient for the client. The counseling
is also done in the client's home.
Mr. Betzold asked if there will be funeral services at this
^ location.
��
�
�,
PLANNING COMMISBION MEETING. JIINE 21. 1989 PAGE 11
Mr. Uban expected the church to perform weddings, memorial
services, but did not know if there would actually be funeral
services. This activity can be restricted.
Mr. Betzold asked if the churches was intending to provide day care
at this facility.
Mr. Uban stated they do not plan to operate a daytime day care, but
a nursery will be provided for services.
Ms. Dacy stated a different church could have those types of
activities and this should be addressed.
Mr. Uban agreed this should be addressed because of the different
requirements.
Mr. Barna asked who the principal occupants of the building are at
this time.
Mr. Uban stated the building is occupied primarily by retail
services.
Mr. Barna stated that if this was a commercial area, the church as
a service-oriented business could be considered in a commercial
area.
Mr. Uban felt there should not be a stand alone church in M-1
district. The church wants same kind of exposure as retail
including a clean front and exposure to a road system.
Mr. Barna stated he could see a church in a C-1 or C-2 area but not
an M-1. If a church is allowed here, it would set a precedent to
allow other churches in M-1 districts. He felt a church in an M- �
1 district was incorrect and suggested the owner request a zoning
change.
Mr. Uban stated this location is visible from the main road and
there is a mix of business which is now more retail with curb
appeal and visibility. Mr. Uban asked if the Commission would
consider a variance.
Mr. Barna stated this would not be allowed as a variance or with
a special use permit.
Ms. Sherek questioned whether the purpose of an industrial zone
includes fostering church growth. It is not the purpose for
industrial use. In looking at related uses, the amendment permits
the existence of copier services, deli's, etc. to provide a service
to the tenants of the industrial park. She did not see a church
as providing services for the tenants of the industrial park.
PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETING. JIINE 21. 1989 - PAGE 12
�"�
Mr. Betzold asked if there were concerns if this was a commercial
area.
Ms. Sherek stated she did not.
Mr. Betzold thought a ahurch should have a place to grow. The City
wants churches in residential areas but residents don't necessarily
want this.
Ms. Sherek stated that if you look at where churches have
traditionally gone in Minneapolis, they have gone into old store
fronts. That is not a conflicting use, but putting a church into
an industrial area would be a conflicting use.
Mr. Barna felt that day care facilities could be considered a
service for tenants, but a church is not appropriate for an M-1
area.
Ms. Sherek stated the Commission would consider modifying a
commercial zone, but not an industrial area.
Mr. Barna stated there are other commercial locations that would
be acceptable areas for a church. The commercial use is okay but
^ he disagreed with a church in an M-1 zoning district.
Mr. Uban stated the City must set up specific criteria for use.
Mr. Uban asked what the Commission would say to rezoning the
building to commercial. It has a commercial appearance and a
commercial mix and it has proper access with a frontage road.
Ms. Sherek asked if there was adequate parking.
Ms. Dacy stated this would need to be evaluated. The area has a
history of parking problems.
Ms . Sherek stated she would not obj ect to rezoning, but that is
something that the owner would have to pursue.
Mr. Kondrick agreed with the comments about a church being located
in an M-1 district. As far as rezoning, owner would have to do
because it is primarily commercial now.
Mr. Betzold would support allowing a church in a commercial
district. He felt the commercial district is the way to go, but
would not support a church in an M-1 district.
Ms. Sherek stated the other problem is that if the M-1 building
^ should go to another owner who would make it more industrial, then
they again have the problem of a church in a building that does not
�,
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. JIINE 21. 1989 - PAGE 13
go with the other uses in the building, and they are back to the
question of whether a church should go into an industrial park.
Mr. Uban asked if the City can pursue changing the ordinance or
make a zoning district change with a mixed use district with
special ratios which allow unique situations to exist and exist
well.
Ms. Betzold encouraged Mr. Uban to work with staff and felt they
could come up with an idea that would work.
5. CONSIDERATION OF HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR ALLOCATIONS OF 1989-90 CDBG FUNDS
Ms. Sherek indicated that the recommendations of the Human
Resources Commission for allocation of funds is as shown on agenda
page 5A.
Ms. Sherek stated RISE was not approved for funds because the funds
were for capital improvements. When RISE came before the
Commission, the Commission members indicated they would not be
qiving them capital funds.
^ Ms. Sherek stated the Kinship program is a befriending program much
like the senior program so only one was funded. The senior program
was preferred because they had acquired 75% of their funding before
approaching the Commission.
Ms. Sherek stated the Little Voyagers Montessori School was
requesting funds for scholarships for their school and the
Commission didn't feel this would be going to needy people.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City
Council approval of the Human Resources Commission recommendations
for allocation of CDBG funds for 1989-90:
��
�
Amount
Amount Rec.for
Requested Fundina
A.C. Association for Retarded Citizens $2,900 $1,000
N.S.C.A.H.
Central Center for Family Resources
Family Life Mental Health Center
North Suburban Counseling Center
North Suburban ICinship Program
1,500
5,000
5,000
5,000
3,000
.�
5,000
4,534
4,534
0
�,
�
�'`,
PLANNI_NG CO1�lI88ION ME$TING. JIINE 21. 1989 PAGE 14
RISE 5,000
Community Emergency Assistance Program 5,000
Southern Anoka Community Assistance
St. Williams Church
Alexandra House
Little Voyageurs' Montessori
Fridley Senior Center
ACCAP - Senior Outreach Worker
TOTALS
5,000
1,000
3,500
1,000
2,500
0
1,000
5,000
1,000
3,500
0
2,500
7.724 6.000
$53,124 $34,068
** Recommended funding amount of $1,000 to be used for the
drop-in center only.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPER80N BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Ms. Sherek stated this would be before the City Council at their
meeting of July 10.
6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING
OF MAY 18, 1989
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the May
18, 1989, minutes of the Human Resources Commission.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY.
7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING
OF JUNE l. 1989
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the June
1, 1989, minutes of the Human Resources Commission.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINt3 AYE, CHAIRPERSON HETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
8. RECEIVE THE MINIJTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING OF JUNE 5. 1989
Mr. Kondrick stated that, at the June 5th meeting of the Parks and
Recreation Commission, Mr, and Mrs. Del Pettis requested funds in
�"�,
�
�
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. JIINE 21. 1989 PAGE 15
the amount of $750 for replacement of a fence that borders park
property. It has been the City's policy in the past to take the
fence and provide one-half the cost of a 4-foot chain link fence.
The Pettis� want to put in a wooden fence. The Commission
recommended offering them one-half the cost of the fencing and
installation of a 4-foot chain link fence along this border. If
the Pettis� do not wish to install a chain link fence the City will
then not provide funds.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Barna, to approve the June
5, 1989, minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission and to
concur with the recommendation to provide one-half the cost of a
chain link fence to Mr. and Mrs. Pettis.
OPOId A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOIISLY.
9. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY
23, 1989
MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the May
23, 1989, minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED T8E
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY.
Mr. Barna stated that they had discussions regarding three
variances which were corner lots. It is difficult for City staff
to decide what is the front, side and back yards. He would like
the City Council and Appeals Commission to come up with a change
in the definition on what is the front, side and back yards on a
corner lot and to define the orientation of the house on the lot.
10. OTHER BUSINESS
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission will begin the
Comprehensive Plan update process on July 12, 1989. This item was
part of the Planning Commission's 1989 Workplan. She stated staff
will present alternatives for the plan�s format, plan horizon, and
overall approach.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to adjourn the
meeting.
OPON A'VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
JUNE 21, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOIIRNED AT 9:00 P.M.
� PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. JIINE 21. 1989 - PAGE 16
Respectfully submitted,
� � � �J
�(- ��`7' � � �(,�
Lavonn Cooper
Recording Secretary
n
�