Loading...
PL 04/11/1990 - 7130PI.ANNIHG COMNIISSION MEETIHG iiEDNESDAY, APgII. 11, 1990 7:30 P.�. Public Planning Commission City of Fridley A G E N D A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11, 1990 7:30 P.M. LOCATION: FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER, 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL• APPROVE PLANNING CONII�lISSION MINUTES: March 14, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #90-04, BY HOLIDAY COMPANIES: Per Section 205.15.O1.C.(11) of the Fridley City Code, to allow garden centers or nurseries which require outside display or storage of inerchandise, on Lot 1, Block 1, Holiday North lst Addition, generally located at 250 - 57th Avenue N.E. (Holiday Plus Store) PUBLIC HEARING� CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING ZOA #90-03, BY BOB'S AMOCO: To rezone Lot 1, Block 1, Lampert's Addition from M-1, Light Industrial, to C-2, General Business, generally located at 7680 Highway 65 N.E. (Amoco Oil Service Station) PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #90-03, BY BOB'S AMOCO• Per Section 205.14.O1.C.(6) of the Fridley City Code, to allow a mo�or vehicle wash establishment on Lot 1, Block 1, Lampert's Addition, generally located at 7680 Highway 65 N.E. (Amoco Oil Service Station) RECEIVE THE MINiJTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 1, 1990 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 5, 1990 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 6. 1990 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF MARCH 8. 1990 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20. 1990 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1990 OTHER BUSINESS• ADJOURN• 9 CITY OF FRIDLEY pLANNING COMMIBBION KEETING, MARCH 14� 1990 ww�wr�rww.r.�.w.w. w.�r�.w..�. wrw.r�wwrrw.�w1wr�►w.w.�r�r�rw.�.w�wrrrwwrwwr.rr�r.r,r.�r.r�.wr.rw�.r�r�.w.w�.w.r�.rw. CALL TO ORDER• Vice-Chairperson Kondrick called the March 14, 1990, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Members Absent: Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Alex Barna, Paul Dahlberg Don Betzold, Sue Sherek Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Steve Billings, Councilmember Dennis Schneider, Councilmember Gary Andelin, Murphy Oil Lori Erickson, Murphy Oil 1 Waite 1916 - 42nd Ave. N.E. Vi and Pau , Linda Wiltfang, 5885 Tennison Dr. Dee and Will Lynn, 7370 Memory Lane William Trudeau, 715 - 49 1/2 Avenue N.E. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 14 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to approve the February 14, 1990, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP '�90-02 BY 123-ABC LEARNING CENTER: Per Section 205.07.O1.C.(4) of the Fridley City Code to allow a day care center in a church, the same being 755 - 73rd Avenue N.E. (Grace Evangelical Free Church) MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Barna, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINd AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIM008LY. d PLANNING CO1rII►�IgBION MEETINa MARCg 14 1990 PAGE 2 ° Ms. McPherson stated Vi Waite, Director of the 123-ABC Learning Center is requesting a special use permit for a day care center at the Grace Evangelical Free Church, located on 73rd Avenue near Madsen Park which is owned by the City. The church is in an R-1, Single Family Dwelling, zoning on approximately 3 acres. Directly across the street to the south is M-2, Heavy Industrial zoning. Ms. McPherson stated the day care center will be operating in three rooms in the lower level of the existing church. The day care center has already received a license from the State of Minnesota to operate from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and for a maximum of 29 children, predominately preschool children. The day care center will be using the adjacent Madsen Park for the outdoor play area. Ms. McPherson stated Section 205.07.O1.C.(4) of the Fridley City Code does allow day care centers in the R-1 zoning district, provided they are located in churches, schools, or other buildings which are located on arterial or collector streets. Avenue is classified as an arterial street, and there eis yfairly good access from 73rd Avenue to the church site. Ms. McPherson stated the Code also requires one every 100 sq, ft. of day care area. The chur ha lot it elf has approximately 200 spaces. In addition, there is area on site for drop-off and pick-up of children and/or parishioners. Two pick-up or drop-off sites have been discussed with the petitioner. The south door is the main entrance to the church. The rear door will also be used as a fire escape and is a little more remote; however, they are intending that this door will be used for late evening drop-offs after the front door is locked for the evening. Ms. McPherson stated currently the entrance and exit driveways are signed °Enter�� and "Exit��. This could potentially cause some confusion for people unfamiliar with the site; however, staff has not made it a stipulation on the recommendation. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of this special use permit request as it does meet all the code re centers. There is adequate parking and traff cn s ce ade care buffering to the neighbors to the east and north of the�site�with a combination of private fences/vegetation and other types of - landscaping. Also, Madsen Park directly to the west of the site provides more than adequate space for the outdoor play area. Mr• Dahlberg asked if there is a re regulations that the day care center mus�t h ve na encea outaoor play area adjacent to the buildinq. Ms. McPherson stated that is correct; however, according to Ms. Waite, the people in charge of State Licensing of the day care pLANNIN6 CO1�II8BION MBETINa, MARCH 14. 1990 PAaE 3 center have agreed that the Madsen Park will fit the criteria for the outdoor play area requirement. Ms. Waite has told staff that no more than 10 children at any one time will be going to the outdoor play area with a staff person. Mr. Dahlberg stated that if the State is going to forgive the requirement for a play area adjacent to the building, then that is f ine . Mr. Barna stated that with another day care center which received a special use permit last year, the rooms used for day care were also connected by doors between the rooms. He did not see that with this plan, only a common hallway. Ms. McPherson stated this plan was reviewed by the Inspection Department, and no stipulations were made for this requirement. There is a secondary exit from the first room so there are two exits for two rooms. Only the middle room is a vulnerable room. She stated staff can research this further. Mr. Dahlberg stated that he believed as far as the Building Code, the size of those rooms is probably such that the rooms do not require two exits, as a classroom or a function classified as a gathering space. However, it would be a good idea for the Inspection Department to re-evaluate this. Ms. McPherson stated she had a letter addressed to Mike Happ, of the Grace Evangelical Free Church from Darrel Clark, Building Inspector, outlining the stipulations required by the Building Code. Those stipulations included the installation of smoke and alarm detectors in each room of the day care, in the lower corridor serving the rooms, and at the top of each of the two stairways serving the lower level. The only egress window which needs to be installed is in the room used for sleeping purposes, the third room on the far east of the building. Also stipulated was the approval of the special use permit and the maximum of children at 29. Mr. Saba stated he felt a little uncomfortable with the authorization from the State to not have a fenced outdoor play area. Ms. Dacy stated that before the City Council meeting, the petitioner should have the confirmation from the State regarding licensing approval and the approval of Madsen Park as the outdoor play area. Ms. Waite stated that room 1 which is close to the outside exit will also have an escape window. There will be a connecting door between rooms 1 and 2. Room 3 is near the wide stairway. Mr. Saba stated that since the day care center will be operated in the lower level of the church and since children will be there for long periods of time, Ms. Waite might want to check into the radon levels. If the radon levels are high enouqh, it may be unsafe for the children. Mr. Dahlberg asked where the children will have their exercise space during the day. Ms. Waite stated room 3 is the large muscle area, and all the children will have access to that at different times of the day. Ms. Waite stated the children are their first concern and will always be under the care of a teacher. They will never be left alone. Outside they will use a rope system while going to and from the park. Over the years, she has never had any problems. Mr. Barna asked about the child to adult ratio. Ms. Waite stated the adult to child ratio is 1 to 10 for the preschool children and 1 to 15 for the school age children. There will be 5 teachers with degrees. Mr. Dahlberg asked if the 29 children are ust and the latchkey children are over and above thee2ghool children, Ms. Waite stated they must never exceed a total of 29 children. That includes preschool age and school age children. Ms. Linda Wiltfang, 5885 Tennison Drive, stated she is a full time working parent and a resident of Fridle awaiting the opening of this day care center � She stated MsX1Waite runs a very beautiful school. She has never of her son or daughter in the care of Ms. Waite�a d her staff.afThe children are well taken care of, and there is always an adult in attendance. With Target and Onan e need in this community for more of �isdtng' there is certainly a ype of day care. OTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, DECLARyD TgE MOTION CLOBED AT 7:55 P.M. ALL VOTING AYE, pICE-CHAIRpERBON RONDRICR CARRIED QNAIiTIMOIIBLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, gp Learning Center, per Section 205.07.O1.C.(4) of the�Fridley3City Code to allow a day care center in a church, the same being 755 - 73rd Avenue N.E. (Grace Evangelical Free Church), with the following stipulations: PLANNING COl►�II88ION 1�BETINa. MARCH 14. 1990 _ PAGE 5 1. The day care center shall meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and fire codes. 2. A letter from the State be submitted before the Council meeting waiving the fenced-in play area. II�N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE, VICE-CSAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIIBLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on March 26, 1990. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING ZOA #90-01. BY MURPHY OIL CO: To rezone from R-1, Single Family Dwelling, to C-1, Local Business, generally located at 6443 East River Road N.E. (Spur Station) O�! TION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Barna, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE, VIC$-CHAIRPER80N RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 5:00 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated Murphy Oil currently owns the Spur Station. Lot 3 is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and the proposal is to rezone it to C-1, Local Business. There is additional R-1 zoning to the east. The lot to the north is zoned C-1. East River Road and R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, are to the west. The other two corners of that intersection are zoned commercial. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting the rezoning of Lot 33 in order to combine Lot 10 and Lot 33 to create a larger buildable parcel in order to remove the existing structures and construct a new convenience store and gas station with a new pump island. By rezoning the residential lot and creating this larger buildable parcel, there will be a greater confonaance to the City's zoning code than there is currently on the existing lot 10 with the existing convenience/gas station. Ms. McPherson stated that before the Appeals Commission meeting where the petitioner requested two variances for this proposal, Mr. Barna had asked how many variances would be needed for the existing convenience store if it was rebuilt today. The answer is seven variances. She stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the two variances requested by the petitioner. PLANNINa CO1rIIrII68ION !SE$TING MARCH 14 1990 PAaE 6 Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning ayso allows the petitioner to provide for greater screening and buffering from the south and east sides of the parcel to buffer the residential neighborhood from this commercial use. The petitioner hopes to be able to utilize many of the existing trees on site and the existing cedar and lilac hedges along the south and east property lines. In addition, the petitioner is proposing additional landscaping and the required screening fence between the commercial and residential districts. Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning will increase the amount of commercial zoning at this intersection; however, this parcel would be approximately the same size as the Christensen Auto Body and Riverside Car Wash and small retail center, all currently zoned commercial. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has submitted for staff review the results of the soil borings that were conducted on site for potential soil contamination from the existing underground tanks. The soil test results were negative for soil contamination, and the City Engineering Department has reviewed those results. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend to City Council approval of this rezoning request with two stipulations: 1. 2. Approval of the special use permit and variance requests The parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel. Mr. Gary Andelin, Murphy Oil, stated they are trying to comply as much as possible with City requirements. They are trying to take a building that was built in the 50's or 60's and improve it to the look of the 90's and become a better business in Fridley. Mr. Kondrick asked if Mr. Andelin had any reservations or questions about any restrictions or limitations being put on the property.. Mr. Andelin stated he did not. He stated it is all part of updating the property. MoTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICR DECLARED THTs MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOIIBLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:07 P.M. Mr. Barna stated that by rezoning Lot 33, he did not think they would be taking anything away from the existing R-1 zoning available in the City. This will be an improvement to the existing pLANNINQ COl�II88ION MEgTING. MARCH 14. 1990 _ PAdE 7 business and will improve the traffic flow and the general look of the whole neighborhood. Mr. Rondrick asked if there has been any neighborhood objection to this proposal. Ms. McPherson stated a neighborhood meeting was held by the petitioner. Two people attended that meeting, and they were basically curious about what was going to happen on the property. However, the property owner to the east has complained about the litter and the practice of snow removal where the snow is pushed to the east into his yard. Mr. Barna stated the existing Spur Station is quite close to that property owner, and the dumpster is located on that side of the building. This new plan should improve that situation. Also, the people directly to the south attended the Appeals Commission meeting with a concern about the sidewalk area in front of their home. Ms. McPherson stated this can be addressed with the special use permit request. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning, ZOA #90-01, by Murphy Oil Company, to rezone from R-1, Single Family Dwelling, to C-1, Local Business, generally located at 6443 East River Road N.E. (Spur Station), with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of the special use permit and variance requests 2. The parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council will set the public hearing for the rezoning at the March 26, 1990, meeting, and the pubic hearing on the rezoning will be held on April 9, 1990. 3. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #90-01 BY MURPHY OIL CO.: Per Section 205.13.O1.C.7 of the Fridley City Code to allow a motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing service as an accessory use to a convenience store, generally located at 6485 and 6443 East River Road N.E. (Spur Station). OTI N by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Barna, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. PLANNING CO1�lIBBION ME$TINa. MARCH 14, 1990 PAGE S o. OPON A VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTINa AYE, VICE-CSAIRPERBON RONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED DNANII�OIIBLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARINa OPEN AT 8:10 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to close and rearrange some of the existing curb cuts. The first curb cut east- bound on Mississippi Street will be closed and the two curb cuts on East River Road will be shifted further south away from the intersection. There is some concern as the right turn lane onto Mississippi from East River Road curves in front of those two driveways. Anoka County has reviewed this plan and has recommended, although no correspondence has been received, to close the northernmost driveway on East River Road. The petitioner is proposing to shift that driveway even farther south and change the radii on that driveway such that it will allow a northbound exit from that driveway but will have the appearance of a one-way in only. There will be adequate space for cars to go in and out at the same time; however, it is the intent through the design to discourage people from exiting northbound on East River Road. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has been very cooperative and has worked with City staff in trying to find a solution that will work for both the petitioner and lessen the traf f ic hazards at this corner. Ms. McPherson stated, as stated by Mr. Barna, Mr. and Mrs. Franklin who live directly south of this site are concerned about the existence of a sidewalk of some kind along the west and north property lines of this parcel. In order to catch the public school bus on Ashton Avenue, their children need to walk along that sidewalk to Ashton Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated the Engineering and Planning staff inet with the petitioner on site to discuss the issue of the sidewalk. Mr. Franklin brought up some issues of maintenance. He is currently clearing the snow on the paved area that is there now, because the area is not wide enough for the City's snow removal equipment. The petitioner will be removing the existing asphalt paving and will be constructing a concrete sidewalk at a slope that will be adequate for the City's snow removal equipment. In addition, there is an existing power pole on the site that narrows the amount of room needed to construct a sidewalk. The petitioner has spoken with the utility company, and the utility company will be moving that pole so the 5 ft. wide sidewalk can be constructed along the west property line. So, the sidewalk issue has been resolved. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend to City Council approval of the special use permit with four stipulations: � pLANNING CO�I88ION MEETINa, MARCH 14,_1990 PAGE 9 1. Reconstruct the existinq sidewalk to a minimum width of five feet from the south property lines around the site to the northeast corner. 2. Drainage calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The driveway issue shall be resolved with Anoka County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. Approval of the variance request Mr. Dahlberg asked if a grading and drainage plan has been submitted. Ms. McPherson stated a grading and drainage plan has been submitted. It is the petitioner's intention to have an infiltration trench in the grassy area directly to the east of the building. Additional drainage will occur toward the green area at the south of the site. That has also been left for snow storage and drainage. Mark Winson, Assistant Public Works Director, has not yet received the drainage calculations. Mr. Dahlberg stated this project really should have little impact on the neighbors to the east except for the two closest residences to the east. Mr. Saba asked about the store's operating hours. Mr. Andelin stated the hours are up to the lessee; however, it has been a 24 hour operation, and they wish to continue that. Mr. Kondrick asked.about lighting. Has there been complaints about lighting into the neighborhood? Ms. McPherson stated she has not received any complaints about lights or the current operation. Mr. Andelin stated at the present time, they have area lights on the entrances and egress. They try to keep maximum lighting for security purposes. The lights are wall mounted and on the canopy• He stated he can foresee no area lights in back of the building, but they do try to keep as much lighting as possible at the entrances for traffic. The canopy lights do give a majority of the lighting. They will keep the lights to a minimum on height, so the lighting will not go over into the residential properties. Mr. Saba asked about any plans for a P.A. system. pLANNING CO1rIIriI88ION MEgTINa, MARCH 14. 1990 PAGE 10 Mr. Andelin stated they are required by law to have an intercom system. This is used mainly to contact people at the gas pumps. It is not a loud system. Mr. Barna asked about any plans for signage. Mr. Andelin stated that at the present time, they will not be changing the signage. The sign will remain in approximately the same location as it is now. Mr. Dahlberg stated staff can review the existing condition of the siqnage and review the requirements of the Sign Ordinance with the petitioner. Mr. Dahlberg stated the present lessee stores his mobile home on the site a great percentage of the time. He believed the Planning Commission would like that not to be there. He would not suggest that this concern be part of the approval of the special use permit, but is there anything the petitioner can do about it? Mr. Andelin stated that as part of their lease package, this type of storage is not supposed to be happening. Mr. Dahlberg stated he thought the site plan is a significant improvement over the existing site. He would like to discuss a possible change to what has been proposed. He stated the property line is very close to the two residences on the east, and the parking and hard surface is being moved away from that property line. He would suggest that this be turned around and the fence and landscaping be put on the opposite side of the fence, rather than having the fence towards the residence and landscaping on the service station side. He would think the neighbors would rather look at greenery than a wooden fence and the neighbor would perceive his yard as being larger. The issue is that it is a maintenance headache for the owner of the property, because they have to go outside their property to maintain the landscaping and pick up litter along the fence. If the fence could maybe not follow the property line but could cut off on a diagonal by the trees and put some landscaping on the residence's side, it would seem to be a more neighborly approach. This is a suggestion for the petitioner to consider. Mr. Dahlberg stated another concern is whether or not there is standing water in the ponding area. He believed there are requirements relative to fencing around detention and retention ponds. With standing water, there is potentially a hazard for children. This may or may not be a problem, but it is something that should be investigated. pLANNING COMMIBBION 1�IE�TINa. MARCH 14. 1990 PAGE 11 Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Winson may be looking at this issue when he looks at the drainage calculations and the volume of water that would be retained. Mr. Dahlberg stated he concurred with the County relative to the northernmost curb cut onto the site from East River Road. The revised sketch indicates that the north edge of that curb cut is 100 ft. probably from the center line or edge of the traffic lane on Mississippi Street, but not 100 ft. from the turn lane. He felt that the curb cut is too close to that intersection, even though it does have a configuration such that it will draw traffic in and potentially discourage people from going back out, it will not discourage people entirely ffom going out that curb cut. He would suggest that curb cut be no farther north than the present south curb cut. This is a busy intersection, and a lot of traffic goes east on Mississippi Street off East River Road. Mr. Andelin stated that as long as the variance is not affected, he is certainly willing to have LBH Architects look at it. Mr. Dahlberg stated he has no difficulty with the two curb cuts on East River Road as long as the northernmost curb cut is moved to the south at the location of the present southerly curb cut which he feels is a reasonable distance from the intersection, even to the extent that vehicles could make that right turn and head north onto East River Road without too much difficulty. Mr. Dahlberg stated the County has given them no information as to why they are recommending only one curb cut on East River Road. Mr. Dahlberg stated that on the southerly curb cut, it appears to him that as traffic is heading into the parking area, it is better to design that curb .cut 90 degrees perpendicular to the street rather than perpendicular to the parking area. It is just a better design for access to that parking area at the south. This is just another suggestion for the architect to consider. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CSAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOBED AT 8:55 P.M. OM TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP #90-01, by Murphy Oil Company, per Section 205.13.01.C.7 of the Fridley City Code to allow a motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing service as an accessory use to a convenience store, generally located at 6485 and 6443 East River Road N.E. (Spur Station), with consideration to be given to investigating the location of the northernmost curb cut .� PLANNING CO1rII�Z88ION MEETINa. MARCH 14. 1990 PAGE 12 on East River Road, investigating the requirements of drainage in terms of ponding, and investigating the appropriateness or advisability of potentially relocating the landscaping and the fence configuration on the east side of the property, and with the following stipulations: 1. Reconstruct the existing sidewalk to a minimum width of five feet from the south property lines around the site to the northeast corner. 2. Drainage calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The driveway issue shall be resolved with Anoka County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. Approval of the variance request IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYF, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIIBLY. Ms. McPherson stated the Council will set a public hearing at their April 9th meeting for April 23, 1990. 4. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS: Ms. Dacy stated that after the February 26, 1990, meeting, the Council discussed the parking stall issue, lot coverage issue, and the landscaping issue. As far as the parking stall size, the Council stated that a 9 ft. parking stall should be used in areas where there is: 1. Long term employee parking 2. Parking ramps 3. Apartment buildings 4. Industrial buildings 5. Some office facilities, but not including medical clinics 6. Redevelopment districts with a special use permit Ms. Dacy stated the Council preferred to keep the 10 ft. wide parking stalls for high turn-over facilities, especially for shopping centers or retail areas and locations such as Unity Hospital and associated clinics. As far as striping, the Council wanted both 9 ft. and 10 ft. stalls to be double striped. A ' PLANNING COMMIBBION MEETINa. MARCH 14. 1990 PAGE 13 Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission should review these policies regarding parking stall size and determine if they want to make any recommendations or additions to the City Council. Ms. Dacy stated the City Council recommended that lot coverage may be increased up to 10� in industrial districts only with a special use permit. Previously, the Planning Commission had discussed the possibility of deleting the special use permit requirement. The Council wanted to start with industrial districts first and see what happens and then possibly consider amending the commercial districts. Also important is that the Council wanted staff to develop some type of standards for the Planning Commission and Council to adopt to evaluate these permit requests. Ms. Dacy stated that regarding the landscaping ordinance, Council has asked staff to prepare the following additional information: 1. Evaluation of the costs of the landscaping requirements as a percentage of the total construction budget. 2. Examine the new fire station site plans for conformance to the landscape ordinance, re-evaluate and draft new language regarding the sections for compliance by existing uses. Ms. Dacy stated that at the meeting, the Council had a question regarding when exactly do existing uses have to conform and when should they do that--upon the time of expansion or is there a set time period? There is a section of the code that provides for that now, but Council wants to look at it again. Ms. Dacy stated the sign ordinance changes will be discussed at a Council meetings in April. Ms. Dacy stated the Council has asked the Planning Commission for input regarding the parking stall sizes. Mr. Dahlberg stated he did not agree with the Council's revised direction on parking stall sizes. He stated he thinks all parking stalls should be 9 ft., and there should be no differentiation between areas, because it would be very difficult to control or monitor. Maintaining a 9 ft. stall dimension is certainly more than adequate for almost any vehicle today, except trucks or RV's. Mr. Rondrick agreed with the 9 ft. stall dimension. Mr. Saba stated he liked the idea of the double striping. Councilmember Billings stated the Council appreciates the fact that the Planning Commission prefers 9 ft. stalls; however, the majority of the Council does not want 9 ft. stalls all over, so they are a ti PLANNING CO1�II88ION MEETING. lSARCH 14, 1990 PAGE 15 MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Barna, to rec�ive the February 1, 1990, Human Resources Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR D$CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIIBLY. 7. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 5 1990 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES• OM TION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the February 5, 1990, Parks and Recreation Commission minutes. IIPON A YOICE VOTE, AI+L VOTIN�3 AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. 8. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 8 1990 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• OM TION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the February 8, 1990, Housing and Redevelopment Authority minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. 9. CEIVE FEBRUARY 20 1990 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the February 20, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. DPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CSAIRPER80N RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. 10. RECEIVE MARCH 6 1990 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: OM TION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the March 6, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYB� VICE-CHAIRPER80N RONDRICK DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 11. OTHER BUSINESS: a. R.T.B. Chair's Advisory Newsletter dated 2/28/90 For the Commission's information b. Earth Day Mr. Saba stated he and the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission would like to remind the Planning PLANNING COMMI88ION MBgTING. MARCS 14. 1990 PAGE 16 Commission members that Earth Day will be Sunday, April 22, 1990, and invite them to the celebration at Springbrook Nature Center. He stated they will be passing out information on what can be done in the community to help people become more environmentally sensible and responsible. ADJOURNMENT• OM TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberq, to adjourn the meeting. IIpon a voice vote, all votinq ape, Vice-Chairperson Rondrick declared the motion carried unanimously and the March 14, 1990, Planninq Commission meetinq adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lyn Saba Recording Secretary , � .� � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE ��N � PLAMNG COMVISSfON DAl'E : Apri 1� i, I 990 f Rt DLEY CITY COUVC� DATE �.� MM/ dn REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZON�IG ADJACENT LAND USES 8i ZOfVIVG UTLJTfS PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FNANCIAL NVIPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREFfNSNE PLAN COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONIVG ENV�iONMENTAL CONSDERATIONS STAFF RECOMME�ATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNNG COMMISSION RECOIM�AENDATION SP ��90-04 Holiday Companies Special Use Permit is required to allow a garden center on the Holiday Plus site. 250 - 57th Avenue N.E. C-3, General Shopping C-2, General Business to east and north; M-2, Heavy Industrial to west; I-694 to south Yes Yes � Approval with stipulations Staff Report SP #90-04, Holiday Companies Page 2 REOUEST The Holiday Companies is requesting that a special use permit be granted in order to operate a seasonal garden center. This request is located on Lot 1, Block 1, Holiday North First Addition, generally located at 250 - 57th Avenue N.E. SITE Located on the site is the existing Holiday Plus grocery/warehouse store. The current garden center is located at the northeast corner of the building, and the petitioner is proposing to relocate the garden center to the southeast corner of the building. The garden center will be accessed from�the interior of the store near the seasonal merchandise department. ANALYSIS Although the garden center will be a"temporary" use located in a permanent location, staff sees this as an opportunity to improve the general aesthetics of the rear of the Holiday Plus store. The garden center will be used for approximately five to eight weeks during the spring to sell bedding plants. The relocation of the garden center to the rear of the building may help to break up the large expanse of brick. This will also reduce traffic congestion between delivery trucks for both the garden center and McDonald's, and Holiday patrons. With the recent Minnesota Department of Transportation reconstruction of the I-694/University Avenue interchange, the Holiday Plus site has become more exposed due to the removal of the maple and ash trees that were located along the south property line of the Holiday Plus site. Staff spoke with a representative from MnDOT and they intend to only sod and seed the construction area. It has been noted that University Avenue is the "gateway" to the City of Fridley. This request provides an opportunity to improve the aesthetics of this particular gateway into the City. Staff is recommending that the Holiday Companies work on a long-range site improvement plan for the rear of this site in conjunction with the special use permit request. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the special use permit request with the following stipulations: 1. The existinq garden center fence shall be removed and the sidewalk/pavement area shall be repaired. Staff Report SP #90-04, Holiday Companies Page 3 2. The shrub beds along 57th Avenue shall be cleaned and mulched with rock and an appropriate weed barrier by November 1, 1990. 3. The dumpsters shall be screened by November 1, 1990, if the trash compactor has not been installed. 4. The petitioner shall work with City staff to develop a long- range site improvement plan for the rear of the building by June 1991. Implementation of this plan to be completed by August 1993. 5. The garden center shall be enclosed with a cyclone fence and vinyl slats. 6. Vinyl slats matching those of the garden center shall be installed in the cyclone fence surrounding the propane tank located on the west property line. � r� �'� �• a� " � t ji �, ��,. �e �� ��A N-��F- . C�y �t ti ��p � ♦ � � �i� towwtR � SfC !! —�i� -11@,a.r. a.r.^al t:. NOR1N O���pY N � `j �. � A��� \ � 15� � •�'. , , �S"-:_"• :.��-iri �. � ""�r �N. ZI FSE�tvi��n : i y cowwf� �, SfC l! +..' a — . ., . � SP ��90-04 Holiday Companies S !/2 SEC. , C/ I � 1 31 ,L� � � I crM►i � �,� � L s«, � -r--�"-�. -�ME.-- - - - -�Ff j I �� ' o r i � .� .. - , . I ' � � � ` � . � ___ — ; � � .... `�-. -, -� a_ a ♦ t�{ i 1j i r_•,r � +_ � ; 1- I ' �- ��� .�. � � �--. � . ;i : � � � , e . — ����I � F j y •� � y .1 i I �`-t�- � y , 4 � _ — I�' . � ''�; 36TM. AVE �'�/�."-'�`-1 � � ' ; � �L_�_�� � '� ' �-- . —. � ; � H�_ �__ ��`� f ' __ � �� I I .I � =� __� �-__ J`T _ • JI� _ ' '�_. , , • 1 / o� �I I I�,�__ . ,: __. r_ 1 • _. ' w . — _ �� ��q'n� ( ��__-�_'_ J _L' �,��-_ t.� I���� � -•ti �• . � I I � i � _ _ ! - . .' i . r____ � � _ _ _ " - �L--L�-y�---�-' � � . .A r. �'�r"""" �""�' , r___ "__t"' � -i.� . _ ' —`r-n— —, .-------- - � r===-^'T_%„�-_� �;�- - -. { .- , .: � > � � i l_- _.r____ ' ��—` '4'_"�f ' � __ _L � w I I t_-_�^ _t- �_. . _"." _ _ _ _ -. ~ '---i �-' �$�H-yV-y�.ic_.. ' _�>;r� --- i -r � �^�---; �--- �;f ---� - � •. ' � � ,�. _ t� —��--`'� _ � - � -����__ � -� ��-.. .._J1 ._�...+. . -t--�r=-=' _�=-� --.. •• - -� - -- II j r -- �r-- '' r . � , - I �----,.--�-� ..Jrt ,. il r___ '^ +~ . 1 . • . •I � I �~� ,`,� *± `•' � `.. � • , I����r t-, ' : I � «L� -��_ � � I I �---- � --- � � , . i f�'---� — � �_ . � —','-- G� im ' 'r---��- . _ .. • � - - -- i Y .�:.e /�VE. N.E. g'"" ` 'r, _ -e � �� F � . � � � — — • �•• •.` n � � — 'y ,� .�' _- �� J•_ � __ � N ` _ O•' • 1. I/ ti � � + ` • � � . � ' - _ I '� I ' ' _ !• : 9r '� 1 • I.! ' / • I � ! / • � ♦ � r {. /' ' r� �' � ! - �r . 1. —�— � � n� �n n� � LOCATIVN MAf' � � 1 ; � SP 4�88-07 Erickson Pet. Corp. { 1 '1 '1 � lllS - —i11 l 11--- �i!!i l l l l l � �— ._ — � :pin ' ..�►.��q .3µf• o�p l•. .. .. �..' • � r . . �• .p a•jy.: .� A � y� -�� � . � - ._ � .: .� .s; + . •1 w'' 'i...: • . � ;ti,�''. , .ry�.. '� = .w � _ _ ' _ l�.�.. "• . . f_ '_ '�_ " �� �" �ti��• ' t:' :.r . �1� , � ~.� r t � • � . . � I+ �} .+� •T � • I W �• ,7• I�... 1 ;� S � , 1 1 1 ,' , � .� . . , , : . ��-ir-�-�-!t�f,-� � . . - -. . -- r, t If! ' � _ � --- --, �. . , - ,� , , , ��.,� � ' � � ' • � � .� _Y � �� � �e�3 I ' �J 1• f � ,I ' � f . 1 �' ' . . � � . _� �I � . ( ► � � . • . . . � / . .•s . 1 � - . � 1, a - -- - t, �� � � ( � �� ���� , , � � b ! . � � � - � I��1 1 I+ �' �1i i i i• j�l�� � � � ;� �f r ,• : � A �II�III�I'I ��� II�1'�I �" ' � �};��I��l� �� � - - -r 1 �iii� i���:,ii�ii�i�i�n� ....� �� -- . , ,�.���.:`, . � � � � ' .... ... .� . —-.........�.�����111111�11 � :- �� .,, � :; '���. � : � �� � , 4 ' � �^� � `~�lt r �,,,� �� � }�4 �1� A �� � t � ��` _ � � � �= _ a �. - �1 � . i� � +^ • 1 :. � ;� �' � ' - _ ' ;- . - • � ! : �_ ���i��. �, � � i���ls �ir� � s t�� �� � ���� - � . _ _ ,_ — -- — - _----� - .. . 0 _ . _' .7 .::�:� � �': � �: � �i�' �. � • �. .� . ;v�� • � I — ; = �t � . . ��� �� - . � . S ITE PLA N � �_, t� 0 a 0 � � � 0 � � Z L �O N � r � N m � r I 0 i � � 1 SP 4�88-07 Erickson Pet. Corp. � I 1� 1 � � � � , � - - ,\ _ � �� � � � �:�. , � . i ,� i , , � ;: . , ,: � � � I ' . , __ .� _ . . ;: , . --- ;:� , , ; I , � , , ,;i I ' ' � I � � � �- i � � I �I - 1 � � • a - ' 1 „� , . � �- -- � ' :►-� I , , .. ' ' .� i � � --.--' ....... - �------ �----..----- � , � . . ;...._.�� --r __ „' _ _j . � ' � � �t � � j � �� -- I � i I � � '� � 1 � � � � � �� � I ` 'i ' - � �- - ° -�--� -� , � 1� ; �,�..__ , i .� � � i �� I � � � ;. ; :;� � , �� _ _� � � d ^ ; ; '� '. � �:-. , ; :;I � � � �� � � � }� ; ; . . .� � � ;��� ,...: _ . . � �.._.._,._ _ . _ . ::� � � r- '°'; . �� � ��• I I � �� ; �� �� � I ` `, . ; ; � � ' ;;I � � � ' ; �----` --a i M�� � t �� ;�� � ,� � I � � I y; - � � _ _ _ _' � �' � � � I i -;.:- '� � � .�..�i �� 'D �- �' �� O O '. OOi: ::�OI �; ' • A ,T� � ' f A :�� � J • .. .�. 1 � . . � � � 'Q' �� 0 � � • � FLOOR PLAN � _ _ � � � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE �'� � PLAtV�VG C.OWI��ISSION DAl'E : Ap r i 1 1 1, 19 9 0 FRI DLEY CITY OOI�VCIL DATE AUTHOR MM/ dn REQUEST PERMIT I�JMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONNVG ADJACENT LAND USES � Z� UTLf�E$ PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FTIANCIAL NvIPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREFENSNE PLAN COMPAT6{LRY WITH ADJACENT USES � ZONNG ENV�ONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEI�ATiON APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNNVG COMMISSION RECOMAAENDATION ZOA ��90-03 Bob Ring of Bob's Amoco Rezone from M-1, Light Industrial to C-2, General Business 7680 Highway 65 N.E. 29,040 square feet M-1, Light Industrial M-1, Light Industrial to south and west; C-3, General Shopping to east; Spring Lake Park to north (C-2, Neighborhood and Service Center Commercial District) Yes Yes Remedial system for groundwater contamination to be installed on site. Approval with stipulations �. Staff Report ZOA #90-03, Bob's Amoco Page 2 REQUEST Bob Ring of Bob's Amoco is requesting that Lot 1, Block 1, Lampert's Addition, generally located at 7680 Highway 65 N.E., be rezoned from M-1, Light Industrial, to C-2, General Business. SITE The site is currently zoned M-1, Light Industrial. The zoning to the north in Spring Lake Park is C-2, Neighborhood and Service Center Commercial District. The zoning to the south and west is M-1, Light Industrial; zoning to the east is C-3, General Shopping. Currently located on site is an automotive service station, a small convenience store, and gas pumps. ANALYSIS The parcel has been zoned M-1, Light Industrial, since 1958; however, the existing use and adjacent uses are not industrial, but commercial in nature. The proposed site improvement by the petitioner will increase the amount of commercial space within the building. Rezoning this parcel to a commercial use would be in keeping with the character of other corners of the intersection. The parcels to the east at the intersection of Osborne Road and Highway 65 have been zoned General Shopping since 1958. The other parcels located in Spring Lake Park are also zoned for commercial use. In other areas of the City, it is common for "loop back" parcels to be zoned commercial, even if there is adjacent industrial zoning. While there is no "loop back" road at this location, it could be argued that the driveway which starts on the west side of the VFW and exits through the Amoco parcel operates and functions as a"loop back" road. Therefore, it would be logical for the City to approve a rezoning of both the VFW and Amoco parcels to C-2, General Business. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning, ZOA #90-03, request to the City Council with the following stipulation: l. The variance request, VAR #90-04, be approved. s v ZOA ��90-03 BOb�S AIDOCO N //2 SEC. /� � a r� I , O O C/T Y OF �- 2 � I. ri � $ i � � .R . Z E .� • �i �, �� M• I . r! � I . 13 �ocATioN MAP ZOA ��90-03 Bob's Amoco ZON�1G MAP g: • �-- L_ — rwoi,�. kv�1O �eJtit� u D S b 0 r+ �,J � r+oPV �tir b•J�lo Gr.a.j�Jr tJTrrrw . 1� !'f•'I��J i � I N • ��1 , � I c�r rM.� I�r��1uJ ro�r:�.J � _ �e.+ a� I � 1 I � 11� s �, � �} �h//IhLO J 4� OWy �+f.i0h.► J�rinJ�D J i � �� l � L v' i�r..��J� �.e.tar�► J�L ZOA 4�90-03 BOb�S AIDOCO —�;,��\'�,7 r "fi � ai' y�Y1� — - — --,-- -- � � ��r---� M+ A04. 4t16Ao► I � _� _�� j I i � ,� i � I L• hT�rb I I. I '� � I . —� I �y I ' � � .�.�, � I I �_, � ; �,I I I �► i . �� � � ; �� I i �` ' . �+; fJr,1 I..u�.�o• ! ! 4 v�{ . ' I�'�' �w rn�itf ao���w I� � � I i j � �':' � I -�---- � � I � , �,__�l. �_ .��z __ { IL� ; 7D ' �_ � ' � I i � t'� L�} 1 � 1 i ��— � � � e� 7�: �� -: � �---- � ' 1 � �I ` � I i' a � I � � i - — - . i �: � a�.s. ! � � M a"r� s ..Ja �. I'be i' :' � a� �+�r •.�y►I � � � Q : � O � � � � + `. � � ; � � L _� v b M � — M � a 3� s� � � i 1 I.��r� v�,�,�r� r1 io► u1 � . bv��- � Ln�f�r1 /�vo�tia�l I�orj►� '/i� • (=c SITE PLAN . --•----i � 1 ii ♦ 1 3 ) .t 3 � ..S o. i :• ?� p �� �. L ,� . � :, ; , �o � ;� : 1 1 �I I � ' i � ( ! � ni \i ._I �I OI � C 7 J J .1� I J J �I ' j: �� ; r � `� l.-_ . „ . 3 � � a J � ' 3 f ` �I � � �• I J � 1 ` I I ` I ;� � �I l � �I "� S �� � �� � I i S � � �I H L e � ZOA ��90-03 Bob's Amoco • . \ i � `� li �' i � i o �� i ;' s ± C� ,! f � . � � + � �j ��� ., :. �..:.. i � .f' ' . 1 � � • T • n :I �-� • . �' !�T .) f iJ I � . • 4�j� � �� � i�i �' . , • � �� � � ,� : : ; :..a_ s._� • . s: . ��i � � � �� l . i �� -�. EL�EVATION r y. � , P ■ t� � I � � -� �� . �1�:� � m ZOA 4�90-03 BOb�S AmOCO c T L __ � �- t � .� � � ` �` � t 1 a�r - W � � 1��� 1� ' � 1;' s. ;� � �. � c. i • � ' o '� � ! I o :c� �\ i ° j °l� \• � I ' _r,,,,�-_—L�. . . �y p_ .�� S IC c � g � S � �__ .�.. . �.. __ � 1 � _f�IVnrL �iLh�Lt. h0�0_ i r' o_ v r s � i � � ' a` � � D L � c . � � � � � � L T � � �� G . r � � � r 0 _ � �x C £� S� � "� L L �r �� r L �1 : � c �, � 0 F 0 ; i � � ,,.,� � � � J � �t I _ ,� ��� ';• �1 �L�,, p� s '�' � e �.fic L ��; . ,. �'� ; T � ° T � � c � C / � / / � � � O._ o j 1. . �, � s T'► � e S �, �� ' L r _,�\` 1 �� I S jrt- .. ....; � I � i � �;•'t ° a ��� ; J �:��— 1-' � �� I + i I � � . p �� v j o I � -• — � —� r � � c a F r � � s � • � �� �. � � � � � � -� c ' ' -�, � ; � i , Q � r �' , � � Q � � � J $ � LANDSCAPE PLAN � � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE ��N QF PLAIV��K' COMNISSION DAl'E : Ap r i 1 >>, 19 9 0 FRI DLEY CITY G�OI�IqL DATE µ�Mpq MM/ dn REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONWG ADJACENT LAND USES �i Z�� UTL�E$ PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FNANCIAL NAPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO riOMPF�Ef'E�11/E PLAi1� COMPATB�'TY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG ENV�ONMENTAL CON.SDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEPDATlON APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNNG COMMISSION RECOIuNAENDATION SP 4�90-03 Bob Ring of Bob's Amoco Allow a car wash at an automotive service station and to reconstruct the pump islands. 7680 Highway 65 N.E. 29,040 square feet M-1, Light Industrial M-1, Light Industrial to south and west; C-3, General Shopping to east; Spring Lake Park to north (C-2, Neighborhood and Service Center Commercial District) Yes Yes Remedial system for groundwater contamination to be installed on site. Approval with stipulations Staff Report SP #90-03, Bob's Amoco Page 2 REOUEST Bob Ring of Bob�s Amoco is requesting that a special use permit be granted to allow a car wash addition to an automotive service station. This request is located on Lot l, Block 1, Lampert's Addition, generally located at 7680 Highway 65 N.E. SITE The site is currently zoned M-1, Light Industrial. The zoning to the north in Spring I�ke Park is C-2, Neighborhood and Service Center Commercial District. The zoning to the south and west is M-1, Light Industrial; zoning to the east is C-3, General Shopping. Currently located on site is an automotive service station, a small convenience store, and gas pumps. In addition to the special use permit, the petitioner has applied for a rezoning from M-1, Light Industrial, to C-2, General Business. ANALYSIS In 1985, the petitioner was granted a special use permit to convert an existing service bay to a back-in/back-out car wash. The petitioner is proposing to construct a 17' x 48' car wash addition to the rear of the building, which would replace the existing car wash. The bay in which the existing car wash is located will be converted back into a service bay and may be used for interior storage of the dumpster and other automotive related items. The petitioner is also proposing to remove the existing pumps and pump islands and to replace these with new pump islands and a new layout (see attached site plan). The special use permit for a car wash is a requirement under the C-2 zoning district regulations. While a car wash is not considered an accessory use under the M-1 district, the petitioner would be required to apply for a special use permit in order to relocate and reconstruct the pump islands. The proposed pump layout will help to decrease traffic congestion at the site while improving traffic flow through the site. In addition, two driveways close to the Osborne Road/service road intersection will be closed. This will help reduce confusion at this intersection. The proposed plan will improve the general appearance of the building as well as improve the landscaping at the site (see attached variance report for other site plan alternatives). In order to construct the proposed site plan, the petitioner will need two variances of which the Appeals Commission on March 20, 1990 recommended approval to the City Council. These variances include a reduction in the building setback to the side lot line and a reduction in the required hard surface setback. During the Appeals Commission process, it was noted that the proposed site Staff Report SP #90-03, Bob's Amoco Page 3 plan would have some impact to the adjacent VFW site to the west. The proposed site plan indicated that the existing driveway and access between the VFW and the Amoco site would be closed off. The petitioner and representatives from the VFW met with City staff on Thursday, March 29, 1990 to discuss these traffic issues. It was agreed that the petitioner would leave the existing opening as it is to provide access from the VFW site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit, SP #90-03, to reconstruct the pump islands and to construct a car wash, with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit a landscape plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Approval of the variance request, VAR #90-04. 3. Joint driveway/parking easements shall be recorded against both the Amoco and the VFW parcels. 4. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. The existing mercury light standards shall be replaced with more modern high pressure sodium standards. � G 1 C �n SP ��90-03 Bob's Amoco N //2 � SEC. /� cirr oF � 2 ��, H� � , � � �. 9 � �. s� � .� I � + I � I p• �.r � _��. 1 _ � _ � � 13 LOCATION MAP SP 4i90-03 Bob's Amoco Z?ONM1G MAP ro��:�.J � JI J bJ�w i � �� Ir.�i+ao � �� 4' �h 'w1a..► J�ri�'Jov I � -- — �— we�.t. 4.v�rio �oJ,r� u' D h b 0 h�� r+oAO �.n•.t e•J,�o L►a.1�Jr WTMJw Mit ti�wJ . t� IY/1r�� ^� � • .`. -y 'L' Mh��lr �Tsro► ' � ��1----� �i�+ 0�I4. 4GTbAe.F � _( \ � � '� � � I I � � i I c• tipr� I. � '� � � , I i � I �; ` � : � � �� �.I I I r "' i �1 � �, I `�� � � I �` '. I 4�+ N�if I��wJo. c crr rM.� I t e�{ .�. I t�} � �% ��w rriKf Mi�1vJ be���w (� � � I $ � j� �� I I � i � � i I' '�'= . . _^ 's � � i,e 11� I 't— � '1'�— _i � � � �'• ' �i _ • . — � . i I � 1 L t Lp � 1 S � i o � � � � � � — �� � ; 7� : � � . -: r , � � � �--- - - � s � i �;! a � � � � 1 � - — • . � �: ti w,c ! � � 1_ M (�'1r s wJ� x 1'be �' SP 4�90-03 Bob's Amoco }-� °^'T :7 • Lira1� f�r/�-w ti�rJ : . � ar °^�T �� �r�y►I � o � Q �' O 3 d J �� i ± � � � � J 1 � � � 7 L CI "� 'J � M � �� 3+ �` i c 3 Lc.�r� vr.�,or�rTio► u1 � , bv�.- � Ln�fbrT novi1�o►J Noht� ��i�. • � -t SITE PLAN �I � t �. � + �: ,� . , �- - „ ,:. '• a � ,, f � o � :i ; i� I �I 1 �I I i � , I� I' II .! _, �� �� el t— � 7 J � � � s � �I � �� � � L 0 :Z SP ��90-03 Bob's Amoco !'. j i� t, �I f �� � �! i i ,� f �� i '� k c l � � � I � ....-. w�. i f. . - 1 y—�-7• � ' I ,_' ' IT_ I ` J _i � . . � • ���.. � :� � • �� I I � � : I � : 1 I • • � . ' � :iL� ��•s: � :� :� >.., � . � I� :.;ji.L . . . .\ � O CI � � � C EL�EVATION 0 + , i � �,j'i`� I� . :�' ;�: C- ' � s O r J � ) � J -o � � � � L � c� � Z ��� � L• 7 � �„_ �..0 G SP 4�90-03 BOb�S AmOCO c T L � �� _.,►.,, �� �'�'-' , � t � t � � � • �r I I ` � a .`� L s. :� � � � F� ��. , a �, ;� �� � . _.�..,___" . _-� ,_. .�., - S ±o i '` ' i �� , i .� ,r I� y�. � � f� � � c ••�` • j O a � �� i�Vl ; � r _!.•. 1 C =Z��� � � �- , . , •' I I � _fr�vnTc � �,e.r�nc�_h_ceo 0 s c r � + i �+, �� °'. - 3 r ff i`� S L �. o ° � I'�t � � i � � ± Q c � � F $ � z . F �� F � c �Z s� � � ilP � `( � y Lr . $ I �-. .,, . �� ,• �. : L t -! C :� o � i ." � _ �s �c I� r �o IS r �� . , J � ' i i I 0 .• a 0 �. ` � � � �, � � � � � . � � / LANDSCAPE PLAN � � STAFF REPQRT APPEALS DATE r�arc� 20, 1990 CITY OF PLAN�VG COAIMSSION DATE FRtDLEY CRY (�I�VqL DATE May 21, 1990 ��� NIl�i:yS REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONWG ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONNG IJTLJTES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FNVANCIAL IMPLlCATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREF�SNE PL/W COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8 ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSiDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEI�ATION APPEALS REC.OMMENDATION PLANNNVG COMMISSION F�CONrMENDATION VAR #90-04 Bcab Ring, Bob's Amoco l�duoe hard surfaoe setback, sideyard setback, and required lot area 7680 Highway 65 N.E. 29,040 sq. ft. N�1, Light Industrial N�1, Lic�t Indt�trial to south & west; C-2, General to east; Snring Lake Park to north N/A N/A Yes Yes Gmtmc�vater oontami.nation system to be i n��lled along south lot line. See Staff Report :•�• .. � Staff Report VAR �90-04, Bob's AmoCo Page 2 A. B. C. PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: section 205.17.o3.D.(2).(a) requires a minimum side yard eetback of 30 feet where a driveway is to be provided. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around industrial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. Section 205.17.03.A.(i) requires a minimum lot area of 3/4 acre for one main building on plats recorded before January 1, 1983. Public purposes served by this requirement is to provide for adequate parking, open landscaped areas, and to limit congestion of industrial areas. Section 205.17.05.D.(5).(a) requires all parking and hard surface areas to be no closer than 20 feet from any street right-of-way. Public purpose served by this requirement is t encroachment into neighboring sight lines and aesthetically pleasing open areas adjacent to of-ways. STATED HARDSHIP: o limit visual to allow for public right- "The existing building as located on the property has placed restrictions on the location of the proposed drive-thru car wash. If placed elsewhere on the site, it would cause loss of parking stalls, staqinq area, and snow storage on this site." ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request Bob Ring is requesting three variances for the Amoco Station at 7680 Highway 65 N.E. These variances are as follows: To reduce the required hard surface setback from 20 feet to 5 feet; to reduce the required lot area from 36,679 sq. ft. to 29,040 sq. ft.; and to reduce the side yard setback to the building from 30 feet to 4 feet. The petitioner is proposing to add a 17 ft. x 48 ft. car wash addition to the rear of the existing building. Staff Report VAR #90-04, Bob's Amoco Page 3 ite The site is located at the intersection of Osborne Road and Highway 65. It is currently zoned M-1, Light Industrial, with additional light industrial zoning to the south and west of the parcel; Spring Lake Park to the north; and C-2, General Business zoning to the east. The petitioner has also applied for a special use permit for the reconstruction of the gas pumps under the M-1 district regulations and both the reconstruction of the gas pumps and the car wash addition under the C-2 district regulations; and a rezoning to rezone the site from M-1, Light Industrial, to C-2, General Business. Analysis Located on the site is a small convenience store, service station, and car wash. One of the service station bays was converted to a car wash in 1985. There are also five driveways accessing the site, two from Osborne Road and three from the private service drive along the east property line. The proposed site plan will close two of these driveways. Lot Area The zoning code requires that all parcels zoned M-1, Light Industrial, be 3/4 acre (36,679 sq. ft.) in size. This parcel is only 2/3 acre (29,040 sq. ft.) in size. Staff is recommending approval of this variance, as denying the variance would render the site non-conforming and unusable. Also, if the rezoning from M-1 to C-2 is approved, this variance will not be necessary as the minimum lot size in the C-2 zoning district is 20,000 sq. ft. Hard Surfaae 8etback On the proposed site plan, the petitioner is changing the direction of the pump islands from a direct north/south layout to a 45 degree anqle northwest/southeast layout. This allows for 6 vehicles to be fueling at one time and also 6 vehicles to be waiting. However, this does require additional hard surface area and reduces the required hard surface setback from the required 20 feet to the requested 5 feet. Staff has explored two other alternatives which would allow the petitioner to meet the required setback. However, both of these alternatives would reduce the amount of available stacking space for vehicles waiting, and this would, in turn, Staff Report VAR #90-04, Bob's Amoco Page 4 reduce the number of customers able to visit t�e site at any given time. One of these alternatives is to maintain the north/south line-up of the pump islands and shift the islands south in order to maintain a 25 ft. driving aisle from the hard surface setback and t2me proposed canopy and pump island. The other alternative would be to reduce the angle from 45 degrees to 30 degrees. This would allow the petitioner to maintain the 6 vehicles fueling and up to 6 vehicles waiting. This would reduce the requested variance from 20 feet to 10 or il feet. Bide YarB 8etback The petitioner is proposing to constnxct an attached car wash on the rear of the building which would reduce the required side yard setback from 30 feet to 4 feet. The VFW on the parcel to the west of the site has a setback of 5 feet to the east property line. This would allow only a 9 foot building separation between the two buildings. Also, the VFW would be required to remove an existing window on the east wall and would have t� rep�ace it with matching masonry block. Staff is proposing that an accessory building for the car wash could be constructed on the south end of the parcel. The construction of a car wash at this location would reduce the amount of extra parking the g�etitioner is proposing to have; however, the petitioner would still be able to meet the code requirement of 9 spaces on the parcel. Also, if constructed at this portion of the site, the detached car wash would have a minimum amount of stacking space, approximately 2 extra cars would be allowed to wait to enter the car wash before interfering with the traffic at the pump islands. This option is also valid only if the request to rezone to C-2, General Business, is approved, as an attached car wash is not permitted in the M-1 zoning district. However, if denied, the petitioner still has an existing car wash in one of the existing service bays. If the petitioner needs four service bays and a car wash, he also has the option of adding an additional bay. It may be difficult to exit the car wash in the winter as there is often ice and snow build-up, and exiting cars may slide toward the VFW building. However, the petitioner still has reasonable use of the site without the proposed car wash addition. If the Appeals Commission chooses to approve this variance request, the petitioner should incur the cost of the removal of the window in the VFW building. � Staff Report VAR #90-04, Bob's Amoco Page 5 Recommendation/Stipulations Staff recommends that the hard surface setback and side yard setback variance requests be denied on the basis that the petitioner has alternatives which would allow him to m►eet the code. This would allow the petitioner to increase the amount of green space on the site for snow storage and storm water detention area. Staff does recommend approval of the lot area variance which, if the rezoning request is approved, will not be necessary. Staff recommends the following stipulations for approval of the lot area variance: l. The southern-most driveway along the private service road shall be reduced to 32 feet. 2. The northern-most driveway along the private service drive shall be increased to 25 feet. 3. Approval of the special use permit request. If the other two variances are approved, the following stipulations are recommended: 1. The southern-most driveway along the private service road shall be reduced to 32 feet. 2. The northern-most driveway along the private service drive shall be increased to 25 feet. 3. The petitioner shall incur the cost of the removal of the window in the VFW building. 4. Approval of the special use permit request 5. Approval of the rezoning request. AApeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. The following amended stipulations were recommended. l. The petitioner shall work with City staff and the VFW to resolve building code and traffic issues. 2. Approval of the special use permit request 3. Approval of the rezoning request Staff Report VAR #90-04, Bob's Amoco Page six Staff inet with the petitioner and representatives of the VFW on Friday, March 29, 1990. The petitioner and the VFW representatives agreed that it would be best if access between the two parcels was kept open. This will allow traffic from the VFW to exit through the Amoco property. Staff also reinspected the site and determined tha� the window would not have to be closed. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request as the petitioner has two other alternatives which would allow him to meet code. .i ,' 1� �� � C=TY O? litIDLEY a0![71lT AEBOIIRCEB OOlO[ItBI0I1 1LSETI�iG, 1t71RC8 l, 1990 r�.�rr�.�r�rr�..�.rr.�.��...r�r�.nr.�w.rw�..�.rr�....nrw.or.��r�.r�rrr��.��run�.�.r�r��.n.�r�.�r�rr�arrn..r�.n. ��� • ����� Chairperson Sherek called the Iiarch 1, 1990, 8uman Re�ources Commission meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. ROLL CALL: Membere Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Sue Sherek, Sue Jackson, LeRoy Oquist, l+tarija xetz Paul Westby Steve Barq, Planning Assistant •�• • � .� � t��frs ►_ � �� h�+i�Y � r � MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to approve the February 1, 1990, Human Resourcea Commission minut�s as written. IIPON 71 VOIC$ VOTB, �►LL vo�ri�a �►�ra, CSl1IRPERBON B8EREIC DECLIIRED TSE I[OTION Cl1RRIED IIIi�TZ1�tOD8LY. •;• � �, MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Ms. Netz, to approve the agenda as written. IIPON 71 VOICE VOTE, !►LL VOTIliG 71YE, C871IRF�R80� BHEREIC DECL�lRBD THE ItOTIO'T CARRIED Qli71NIM408I.Y. 1. OLD BUSINESS: a. Opdat• on �to tault Gri�vanc• Traiainq Mr. Barq stated the only other request the Department of Human Riqhts has received is one from the City of Crystal. TAe Department wants to do one basic traininq and one advanced traininq. Al1 the Department needs is a place and a date. Ms. Sherek stated she would like the advanced training for Fridley unless the traininq team and materials are not yet in place. She suqgested May 5-6 or �pril 28-29. She also asked staff to tell whoever does the training to brinq their owr► audio visual equipment. r � �+� z. �_ � .�.. . : . �l� h� . I . _ . . 1 _ _ � c • a�: � c : Mr. Barq stated that if the sessions qo more than 4-5 hours, the City could provide box lunches to be paid for by the persons takinq the training. b. Qpdato on Coapr�h�nsive Plan Process Mr. Barq stated this process goes to the Council on March 12, 1990. He stated the Commission will be reviewing the following chapters: Transportation, Housing, and a special chapter entitled Human Resources. It is hoped the Commission will review these chapters by late summer, making commente and recommendations to the City Council. 2. NEW BUSINESS: a. Consid�ratfoa oi HRC Bection oi Commission orientation Mr. Barg stated this was included in the aqenda packet for the Commission's review. He had outlined the Commission's role and then outlined two duties of the Commission, CDBG and No-Fault Grievance, with examples of those duties. Ms. Jackson stated it was very nicely written. Ms. Sherek aqreed. However, regarding the paraqraph on No-Fault Grievance, she has received a larqe number of filinqe with the State Department of Human Rights against Fridley employers, larqe and small--mainly allegations of age discrimination and sex discrimination. For awhile the level of complains were fairly constant at 1-2 per month, and now she is seeing 4-5 per week. Maybe the Commission should discuss the possibility of getting some information from the State Department of Human Riqhts and put together a package that can be sent out to the various employers in the City of Fridley telling them about the Human Riqhts Statutes and how these statutes apply to employment. Ms. Jackson stated that maybe in addition to informinq employers, they can suggest that the local newspaper do an investigative report to promote community awareness. Mr. Oquist stated he is not surprised at the age discrimination, because that is typical of what "corporate America" is doinq today. Most of these companies are doing it. In today's environment, they can get away with it, because more people are looking for work and it is becominq harder to do anythinq about it. He stated it probably would not hurt to send out : � ; information to businesses, but, for the most part, businesses do not care. Ms. Sherek stated one thing that was done several years ago that seemed to be effective was to secure literat$nd on no-fault qrievances, Bend it to the company, request that it be posted on the bulletin board. It increased the level of complaints, but it�cri n g t was tenor of the response from the company contacted by a No-Fault Grievance Committee member. Ms. Netz stated she thouqht it certainly wouldn't hurt to increase people's awareness. She would think that with t11e aqinq of the population that businesses would �tart keepinq older people in the job market. It was Burprisinq to her to learn that this is not happeninq. Ms. Jackson stated she thouqht it would be appropriate. to do a mailinq. Ms. Sherek suqgested that Ms. Jackson draft an article for the Fridley Focus on the No-Fault Grievance process and statinq that people who have been discriminated against can call the Municipal Center. Mr, garq stated he had materials available that would be useful in putting a news release toqether for publication. Mr. Barg asked if the Commission members were satisfied with the wording of the Commi�sion's Role. The Commissioners agreed they were, that no changes were needed. Mr. garq stated that when the entire �i�tosthe Orientatio�nr�suCommissionlfor�reviewll bring Human Res b. Consideration o� 7►lt�rnatives Bhovinq Bupport for c�s�/ �tational Co�sunitY D�v�lopasnt Roak I+I=. Barg stated that he had included in the agenda information regardinq National Community Development Week. The information stronqly suQqests that the CDBG proqram may be cut or reduced in future years . He stated the fourth annual observance of 199'��onal cit ies nand Development Week is April 7- 14, counties are urged to do something to show their support for the CDBG proqram bY passing a resolution or writing a letter to Conqress stating the thinqs that have been �i�1x.s_ �.- _ • ��' : : a�• .4_ _ : • , r_ : , c :��_.�'��_ ' ' ' ' � made possible with CDHG funds. He stated a sample resolution was outlined in the information. Mr. Barq stated he has talked to Ms. Dacy about this, and she thouqht it would be very worthwhile to draft either a resolution and/or a letter to be sent on to the Council for approval statinq the thinqs that have been made possible with CDBG funds and the Commission's feelings about the importance of keepinq the CDBG program in place. Mr. Barg stated other thinqs suggested were articles in the local newspaper and spots on local cable TV. Ms. Sherek stated it would be appropriate now as the FY- 91 federal budqet is in the process of being debated during the months of February and March. She did not think very many people are aware that the federal budget will be set in April for 1991. Ms. Sherek stated she thought a letter from the Fridley Human Resources Commission to Congressman Sikorski and the two state senators would be far more effective than a resolution from the City Council. Ms. Sherek stated the letter should reflect that the City of Fridley has benefited from the human services portion of COBG monies in the last several years in the areas of mental health, food shelf assistance, handicapped and disabled, senior outreach worker; and the City of Fridley finds this assistance vital to some of these programs and would therefore like to see CDBG funding continued, if not increased, in future years. Ms. Jackson stated she wouid like all the Commission members to siqn this letter as constituents, not just the Human Resources Commission as a body. MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Ms. Netz, to draft and send a letter to Congressman Sikorski and Senator Durenberqer and Senator Boschwitz Bupporting the continuation of CDBG funding. Ms. Sherek asked Minnesota who is there is, then a person as well. if there was anyone within the State of on the Appropriations Committee. If copy of this letter should go to that IIPON A VOICE VOTB, ALL VOTING 71Y$, CHAIRPBRSON BHERER DBCLi�IRED THE 1[OTIO�i CI,RRIBD IINl�NIMOIIBLY. ^ � t• :� :1�� , : • '� : h• � � _ = • � - -i� � : `� � ' ` � Mr. Barq stated that on Monday, Feb. 26, 1990, the Council approved the recommendations made by the Hwaan Resources Commission for CDHG fundinq which means human services will receive $33,291, just sliqhtly less than last year. Notices have been sent to the Fridley Focus and cable TV to solicit applications. He will be sendinq letters to last year's applicants and other orqanizations that have indicated an interest in applying. � • ��_�!r!• � MOTION by Mr. Oquist, meetinq. vpon a vofa� deciar•d tb� ltarah 1, adjourn�d at 8:30 p.a. Respectfully mitted, � � _ �r.,� -'� y Saba Recording Secretary :' seconded by Ms. Jackson, to adjourn the vot�, ail votfaq ap�, chairporson eb�r�k i990, Hu�aa it�sourc�� Co�ission '��tiaq � .� � ��r CITY OF �RIDLBY Pl�R1C8 11ND RECREATIO�i COIrII�IIBBION M8$TI�ia, l[71RCH 5, 1990 ��SM�M��S��YrMrM��M�►�,►�r��Y��Y1Y�1D.►A�►�M� V �M�ti��IDrN�N�►�Yw�.Y��Y����M�Y��Y�M eA�T TO ORDER: Chairperson Kondrick called the March 5, 1990, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Dave Kondrick, Mary Schreiner, Dick Young, Tim Solberq John Gargaro Others Present: Jack Kirk, Director of Recreation and Natural Resources Mark McCown, Fridley Jaycees Bob Schmidt, Fridley Jaycees Ralph Vollaaan, Public Works Department ,�„�, �,enn vnuua AND RECREATION COMMISSION A PROVAL Ur� r��nxur,sc� �, i» �• ---- MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by Ms. Schreiner, to approve the February 5, 1990, Parks and Recreation Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICB VOTE, lrLL VOTING AYE, C8l�IRPBRSON 1CONDRICR D$CLARED THE MOTION CPiRRIED ONANIMOIISLY. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: �i TQ ION by Ms. Schreiner, seconded by Mr. Solberg, to approve the agenda with the change that item 3-a, "Fridley Jaycees - Softball Tournaments" be moved to item 1. IIPON ATIONCCARRIED �ONl�NIldOIIBLY 11ND TH$Il�aBNDA l�PPROVEDRASECLARED THE MO AMENDED. 1. FRIDLEY JAYCEES - SOFTBALL TOURNAMENTS Mr. Kirk stated that at the last meeting when the Commission members approved the two tournament requests by the Jaycees, the Commission approved the requests at the non-profit organization rental fee of $600 and a$50/day concession stand fee, but leaving the option open for the Jaycees to f � ( p�1tRS i RECREATION CO1dMIBBION ld'PQ.. KARCH 5. 1990 PAGE 2 make a proposal for a possible donation in lieu of the rental fee, similar to what they did last year. He stated Mr. Mark McCown and Mr. Bob Schmidt are at the meeting to make a proposal to the Commission. Mr. Schmidt stated the Jaycees would like to present a check in the amount of $5,000 to the Park Board from their charitable gambling monies. They would like the money to be used to computerize the City's recreation registration process and the remaining monies to be used for the summer programs. This donation would be in lieu of the tournament rental fees. Mr. Schmidt stated the Jaycees continue to sponsor the Springbrook Nature Center Easter festivities and the Haunted Halloween party. He stated they plan to make a donation to the Fridley Senor Center and the Early Childhood Learning Center. Mr. Schmidt stated this donation is their way of saying "thank you" to the City of Fridley for all it has done for the Fridley Jaycees. Mr. Kondrick stated the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Recreation and Natural Resource Department, as well as the City of Fridley, are very fortunate to have an organization like the Jaycees and they are very grateful for this generous donation. He stated a donation of this kind is incredible. He stated the donation will be used as requested by the Jaycees. Mr. Kirk stated one of the Recreation and Natural Resource Department's goals is to computerize the registration process. At this time they only have one PC with word processing and no opportunity to use it for registrations. They need one more PC that can be put at the counter and used for registrations. He believed they can get the hardware needed to be compatible with the City's system for approximately $2,000 and another $1,000 for software. That leaves approximately $2,000 for summer programs. They were able to purchase a lot of supplies last year with the Jaycees donation that could not have been purchased with just the summer programming budget. He stated the Jaycees have come through again for the Department, and this is a fantastic donation. Ms. Schreiner stated that the Jaycees have done very well this year and should be commended for their good leadership. Mr. McCown stated the new President of their Chapter is Tom Brunmeier who is very community oriented. If all goes well and they are able to continue to use charitable gambling � � �l1RR8 i RBCREAT ZON COI+IIrII88ION ri'PG ., l[lIRCH 5. 19 9 0 PAQE 3 monies, there is nothinq out of siqht that not be able to do to help. The City is to contact the Jaycees whenever they need som 2. STAFF REPORT• a. b. c. Proqram �pdate the Jaycees will feel free to e help. Mr. Kirk stated the Commission members had received the monthly program update dated March 5, 1990, which reported on the skating rinks, Minnesota State Bicycle Conference, program registration, Service Club Olympics, Senior Center hiqhlight in Star Tribune (featurinq Connie Thompson), Senior "Foot Care" Program, attempted break-in at Springbrook Nature Center, advanced hunter class at Springbrook, and the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association State Conference. Sprinq !►ctivities Mr. Kirk stated registration has been going for about 1-1/2 weeks. He stated the activities are filling up rather rapidly. Ms. Schreiner stated the names and locations of the parks are listed on the back of the recreation brochures. She suqgested that a graph be made up listing the parks and all the various activities that are featured at each park. She stated this is done by the DNR for state parks, and there are other communities that do it. Mr. Kirk stated one of the goals this year for the Parks and Recreation Department is to print a new park map, and a graph like that could be put on the park map also. Mr. Young stated they should also include all the county parks in Fridley such as Riverfront Park, Locke Park, Mahnomen Park, Islands of Peace Park, and the Rice Creek area by Medtronic. Mr. Kondrick stated Ms. Schreiner's suggestion is an excellent one for future recreation brochures. 8katinq Rfnk Report Mr. Kirk handed out a copy of the attendance figures for the 1989-1990 skating season. He stated this was not a typical season because of the extremely cold weather in December and then the extremely warm weather � �_' i�. � i1� Y�Y ' � .Y� � • �_ � 1 i . in January and February. The numbers are way down from the beginning of February until the rinks were closed. Mr. Young stated the number of skaters at Moore Lake was rather impressive at 825. Mr. Kirk stated that is attendance for just the hockey rink as there is no general skating area at Moore Lake. Mr. Young stated the numbers are very high at Ruth Circle Park. Mr. Kirk stated there are many children in this area. Mr. Kondrick stated these figures can be used for comparison with next year's figures although they are not a good barometer because of the peculiar weather. d. 1990 Department Qoals and Objectives Mr. Kirk stated staff has been working with the City Manager on department goals and objectives. These will be formally presented to the City Council late March/early April. He stated he thought it might be helpful to review these with the Commission so they know the direction staff is looking at for 1991. Mr. Kirk reviewed the objectives and activities for each objective. The objectives were: (1) To acknowledge the 10 year anniversary of the grand opening of Springbrook Nature Center's Interpretive building. (2) To improve the appearance of the Springbrook Nature Center entrance. (3) To provide new, timely, and innovative programming/environmental learning opportunities to the community. (4) To develop a comprehensive volunteer support network to service the Fridley Senior Center. (5) To complete and distribute a combined Reference and Discount booklet for senior citizens. (6) To provide elementary age and middle school age after-school activities and "non-school days" special events. 1 L' 1� 1 � -1 Y'Y � .�. � • 1 " (7) To increase transportation opportunities for elementary age youth participatinq in after-school activities and summer playground programs. (8) To improve office efficiency by producing professional administrative forms with all registration and rental procedures. (9) To provide an activity/picnic building at Commons Park. (10) To provide a central storage building/concession stand at Little Leaque baseball fields. Mr. Kirk stated staff will be bringing the new 5 year capital improvement program to the Commission for review at the next meeting. Mr. Young stated that for the last couple of years, shop students from Fridley Hiqh School have built a house. Staff might want to consider approachinq the High School to see if they would be willing to build, rather than a house, a new structure at the Little League fields. It would save the City most of the labor costs. Mr. Kirk thanked Mr. Younq for that suqqestion. 2. NEW BUSINESS• a. N.$. Chamber Orchestra Requests Mr. Kirk stated the N.E. Chamber Orchestra is submitting two requests to the City for the 1991 calendar year. The Chamber is requesting the City raise the per concert rate which has not been raised since 1984 from $150/concert to $200/concert. Mr. Kirk stated the second request is for the City to fund one-half the cost of a electronic synthesizer. The estimated total cost is $1,500-2,000. Ms. Schreiner stated that if the City funds half of the electronic synthesizer, who owns it and where would it be stored? They would also have to put together some type of policy for its use. Mr. Younq atated it something that could be used by the City Band, too. Ms. Schreiner asked about the possibility of usinq donated funds from the Fridley Lions or Jaycees to help fund the synthesizer. PARRS i RFCREATION COMMI88IOI�1 MTQ.. I�LARCH 5. 1990 PAQE 6 Mr. Kirk stated there is no money budgeted for this type of expenditure for this year. The earliest it could be budqeted is for 1991. Donations are always possibility, but maybe instead of the Chamber requesting donated funds from the City, the Chamber should approach these organizations on their own and get funds donated directly. He can suqgest to the Chamber that there are other funding sources within City. MOTION by Mr. Younq, seconded by Ms. Schreiner, to receive the letter from the N.E. Chamber Orchestra dated February 6, 1990, regarding the purchase of an electronic synthesizer; and to put this item on the list of possible capital outlay expenditures for the 1991 budget since funds are not available in 1990. a the IIPON l�i VOIC$ VOT$, ALL VOTINQ 71YE, CHAIRP8R80N RONDRICR DECLARED TH$ MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIIBLY. Ms. Schreiner stated that in the past, the Commission has felt the Chamber members should be paying some type of fee to play in the orchestra. At one time, the Chamber was not reimbursed for concerts; they played for free. Then, the Commission agreed to pay them $150/concert to help pay the director's salary. Obviously, these people derive pleasure from playing in the orchestra or they wouldn't do it, but should they be getting paid to do something they like to do? Mr. Young stated that, with other activities and programs, people pay fees to participate. Mr. Kirk stated that at one time, the City paid the director's salary. The Commission later discussed the fact that the City does not pay FYSA coaches and other volunteers so why should the City pay for the Chamber director? That is when they decided to go with the per concert rate. O ION by Mr. Young, seconded by Ms. Schreiner, to accept the letter dated February 6, 1990, from the Northeast Chamber reqarding the request to raise the per concert fee. IIPON A VOIC$ VOTB, ALL VOTING ]�YB, CHAIRPER80N RONDRICK DECLARED THB 1riOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Kirk stated that in his initial 1991 budget information to the department heads, the City Manager said this was going to be a year for "belt-tightening", . . l � PARRB i� RBCREl�TION COMMI88ION i�i'PG.. IL�RCS 5. 1990 PAQE 7 and that there is not qoing to be much money available. for increasing expenditures. Ms. Schreiner stated she would like to have the Chamber explain their financinq. How much is the director paid, how much is the music expenditure, etc.? Mr. Younq stated the Chamber may have other income sources also. Mr. Solberq stated he did not know if it is necessary to have the Chamber come to the Commission with this information. MOTION by Ms. Schreiner, seconded by Mr. Solberg, that due to the budget tightening process requested by the City Manager, the Parks and Recreation Commission cannot qrant an increase in the per concert rate to the Northeast Chamber Orchestra, but will continue to pay the Chamber $150/concert for a maximum of five concerts per year. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING 11YE, CHAIRP$RSON RONDRICR DECLARED TH8 l�[OTION CARRIED DNANIMOIISLY. Mr. Kirk asked if the Commission would still like to see some financial information from the Chamber, the addresses of the members, and any dues paid by the members. Ms. Schreiner and Mr. Younq said, yes, they would still like to request that information. Mr. Young stated it is information they request of other organizations the City helps support, such as the FYSA. Ms. Schreiner stated the Commission should review that information before a check is issued to the Chamber for their first concert. c. RivervieM 8aiqhts park Mr. Kirk stated the Commission has received a copy of a memo from the Community Development Department dated February 16, 1990, regarding the 1990 Community Block Grant Allocation and Riverview Heights Acquisitions. He stated there is not enough CDBG money to purchase either Parcel 4 or Parcel 5 outriqht for next year. The Community Development Department is suggesting to the Council the following options: 1. Proceed to trade funds with another community, realizing that the amount borrowed in 1990 to . PARRS i RECREATION COlIIrII88I0I�T MTa.. ZtPiRCH 5. 1990 PAQB 8 , acquire Parcel 5 would have to be returned in 1991. This would postpone acquisition of Parcel 4 until 1992. CDBG funds may or may not be available in 1992 depending on congressional action. 2. Decide not to acquire Parcel 5 or Parcel 4. 3. Proceed with acquisition of Parcel 5 and trade money with another community, but decide not to acquire Parcel 4. Mr. Kirk stated staff is looking for input from the Parks and Recreation Commission. He stated he would recommend pursuing option #1. The Commissioners agreed. MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by Ms. Schreiner, to recommend the City Council pursue option #1. IIPON A VOIC$ VOTE, l�LL VOTING AYB, CSl�IRP�RSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE KOTION Cl�RRIED �NANIMOIISLY. c. Flanery Park Buildiaq Mr. Kirk stated they are getting close to getting the specs out on a proposed building for Flanery Park. They have followed the building that was recommended last year by the Commission, which was a double hexagon-type building, 35 ft. diameter. One of the hexagons would be enclosed as a warming house and activity shelter. The other hexagon would be an open- air picnic shelter. Mr. Kirk stated staff wanted some input from the Commission before proceeding and the Commission's recommendations on the type of roofing, flooring, windows, interior walls, etc. Mr. Young asked how feasible it would be to look at air conditioning for this building. The cost of a small whole house air conditioner is around $1,000. Mr. Kirk stated he thought the energy costs would be quite high, and it was his opinion that there woul,d be negative reaction to such a proposal. In a summer playground program, there are children going in and out and that would drive the energy costs up. Mr. Solberg asked if the windows served any specific purpose other than merely to provide some light. He 1 . • �� riY � ,� C � �• � ����r.-�J etated maybe ekylights could be put in instead of windows which miqht eliminate some of the vandalism problems. Mr. Kirk stated windows certainly do invite vandalism. and they are looking at protective devices for the windows. One advantaqe with having windows is that rink attendants can look out to see what is qoing on. Riqht now most of the buildings do not have any windows, and the attendant has to walk outside to check the rinks; and then the building is unprotected. Mr. Younq stated that the Building Code may require wir►dows for egress from the building in the event of fire since there is only one door. He was surprised that the building only had one door. Mr. Kirk stated he was sure that because of the size of the building and its capacity, only one door is needed. He stated he would check on this again. He stated he thought windows would add to the building in terms of appearance, ventilation, and natural lightinq. The Commission members accepted the location of the building as being appropriate for the site as well as the overall design of the building. The Commission members agreed with shingles for the type of roofing. The Commission members aqreed with concrete flooring in the shelter with rubber matting during the ice skating season. The Commission members agreed with some type of security devices for the windows to prevent vandalism. Staff should look into windows made of Lexan instead of glass. The Commission members agreed with the interior walls being constructed out of wood as long as there is no concern for vandalism. They felt the walls around the restrooms and storage area should be masonry but were concerned about the cost of block versus wood. Mr. Voll�an stated this is going to be a supervised building, and he did not see the need for any masonry walls. Mr. Solberg stated he wondered if this building is really larqe enough. , PARRS ic RECREATION COIrIIdI88ION KTQ.. 1L1�lRCH 5. 1990 PAaE 10 . Mr. Young stated the usable space is 413 sq. ft. Maybe staff should find out from the Fire Chief and the Building Inspector how many people are allowed in 413 sq. ft. Mr. Kondrick stated maybe they should have a 45 ft. building. This 35 ft. building does seem too small. Mr. Kirk stated it is his understandinq that the 413 sq. ft. excluded the bathrooms and storage, so the usable space was approximately the equivalent of a 20 ft. x 20 ft. garaqe. Mr. Young asked if there was any way to have the building larger and the open air shelter area smaller. For summer playground use, the children could be both indoors and outdoors. Mr. Kirk stated that a feature of the open air shelter is that when the building is closed, the open air shelter is available for use at any time by anyone using the park. The building itself would only be open when there is a supervisor. In the summer, most of the programming will be outside because it is cooler. Mr. Young asked if the building will be available for use by the community for meetings. Since one of the goals for 1991 is to offer more after-school activities which may or may not have to be located in a school, programming could be looked at for this building. That is also something to consider regarding the size of the building. Mr. Kirk stated the Commission will have to look at guidelines for uses and rental. Mr. Kondrick stated staff can provide additional information, possibly for the next meeting. 3. OLD BUSINESS• a. Canada Goose Control Project Mr. Kirk stated the Commissioners has a copy of a memo he had written to the City Manager dated February 13, 1990. The recommendation to enter into an agreement with the University of Minnesota for a four-year goose control proqram at Moore Lake Beach beginninq with the summer of 1990 will go before the City Council on Monday, March 12, 1990. It is a$4,000 program, $1,000 per year for four years. He will try to have Jim Cooper from the University of Minnesota or a PARRS i� RECREl�TION CO1�iI88ION 1[Ta., iSAItCB S. 1990 PAQE il representative at the Council meeting to answer questions. Mr. Kirk stated Mr. Burns has had several requests to include Harris Lake in the goose control proqram. It is Mr. Burns' feeling that unless Harris Lake can be included with Moore Lake at the same cost, the Council will probably go just with Moore Lake. Mr. Cooper will be surveying the sites and will make that determination. Mr. Kirk stated it would also be very helpful for Parks and Recreation Commission member(s) to attend the Council meeting on March 12. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Ms. Schreiner, seconded by Mr. Solberg, to adjourn the meeting. IIpon a voiae vote, all votinq aye, Chairpersoa 1Condrick declared the March 5, 1990, Parks and Rocreatfon Commissfon meetinq adjournea at 9:2o p.m. Res ectfully su mitted, �� �`�l Lyn Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 6, 1990 CALL TO ORD� : Chairperson Dahlberg called the March 6, 1990, Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. ROLL CAL�' Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Paul Dahlberg, Dean Saba, Bradley Sielaff, Rich Svanda Bruce Bondow, Steve Stark Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant CO_IgSION MINU�� OT ON by Mr. Svanda, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the January 30, 1990, minutes of the Environmental Quality & nerg Commission meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANII''IOUSLY . 1. ,s�� nTtgINESS • a, Video Presentation Mr. Saba showed the l�s�lent presentedeon Good Morning recorded from a specia 9� The video America, entitled "Prescription for Elast,ic recycling, covered the topics of forestatiri ►W th the environment water, global warming, and shopp 9 ort, Act, in mind. They used the acronym S.A.V.E. (Supp Vote, �ducate). Mr. Saba would like t these issues�lOne areac could�be pro-active concerning a better shoppinq for the environment to makeb�ook Nat re Center place environmentally to live. Spring xe has activities planned to celebrate Eart flyer�which distributed an example of an Earth Day includes the City as eaheldi the weekend of Apr 1e20a22h Day celebration will b . $NVIRONl�IENTAL QIIl1LITY 11IdD ENERGY COMKISSION MBETINQ. 1dARCH 6, 1990 PAGE 2 On Sunday, April 22, there will be a rally at the State Capitol. Churches and schools in the City are also getting involved. One class is preparing a petition to take action to protect the environment. He felt Earth Day provided a good opportunity to get involved; however, it is late. He asked that the Earth Day activity be put on the billboard in front of City Hall. Ms. Campbell stated she would be at a booth for the recycling program. A comprehensive plan outline has been written. Waste reduction will be a part of the 90's. The display for environmental shopping has been stored at the Nature Center and will be used for Earth Day. Mr. Saba stated he would also like to see the larger stores involved. Greenpeace is a sponsor of Earth Day, but this is a more extreme group. The City could participate by taking part in and/or promoting the activities at the Nature Center. Mr. Svanda stated he saw in the "Fridley Focus" a sprinkling ban. There could be something on water usage. Ms. Campbell felt they could disseminate information on all of the issues, with a focus on the "E" for educate. Mr. Saba felt there in terms of working or Target, to have Day. were other things that could be done with larger stores, such as Holiday them hand out information on Earth Mr. Dahlberg felt it important to provide information, but not force anyone to take a position. Mr. Saba stated Dakota County had a handout about shopping environmentally. Individuals can also write companies that they bought a competitor's product because of the packaging. Mr. Svanda asked if a brochure would be supported. Mr. Dahlberg recommended preparing information and/or educational materials that can help make residents aware of what can be done or what is available. This can be promoted through the cable TV, articles sent to the Fridley Focus, and expanded. Mr. Saba stated that Springbrook is going to ask the Mayor for a Proclamation for Earth Day. Should this proclamation also include the City rather than just the Nature Center? Churches and schools are planning various SNVIRONMBNTAL QIIALITY AND BNER(iY CO1rIIrII88I0Id 1dB8TIN(�, lLl�RCH 6, 1990 PAGE 3 activities around City of Fridley be Nature Center has would like to see least brochures. Earth Day. He would like to see the a leader in Earth Day activities. The three days of activities planned. He either a kick-off of some sort or at Mr. Dahlberg stated that, when the Nature Center made the initial contact to have representation from the Council and/or this Commission, he felt that would be a significant contribution by the City. There are not enough resources to make a big impact; however, they may prefer not to look at it some of these issues beyond Earth Day, but rather as a part of the workplan that can be done throughout the year. Ms. Campbell stated that the Nature Center will be re- using the programming from the grant that the City got from the Met Council. The environmental shopping display goes into the topic of waste reduction. It is very accurate, and it could be the focus of Earth Day. Mr. Saba felt it would be nice if there was a handout available that day or relative information in the Focus. Mr. Dahlberg asked what major issues would be stressed at the Nature Center. Mr. Saba stated that all environmental elements would be covered. In addition would be the Mayor's Proclamation and people would be asked to sign an Earth Covenant, which basically states they would try to take better care of the environment. Ms. Campbell stated that Siah St. Clair, Director of Springbrook Nature Center, is sensitive to the activist label. She suggested expanding recycling to include waste reduction. That could also be expanded to include environmental shoppinq. This could begin to address some of the things discussed. She felt it important to provide information, but at the time not make political statements. � Mr. Dahlberg asked Ms. Campbell to put the information together into some plan of action. Mr. Saba would like to have a brochure that announces what the City provides for waste reduction. Ms. Campbell stated she could have somethinq prepared for distribution at the booth on Earth Day. BNVIRONMENTAL QII]�iLITY 11IdD pAGE 4 $NERGY OMMI88 ON E Q Ml�RCH 6 990 Mr. Dahlberq asked should be endorsed proceeding. if information to be distributed by the City or authorized before Ms. Campbell stated she could prepare information for the next meeting and discuss it with Ms. Dacy. This could then be placed on the agenda for a City Council meeting in April. Mr. Saba felt any announcements made would have more impact if made during the week of the Earth Day activities. Mr. Svanda recommended tying in recycling, waste reduction and yard waste management. Mr. Saba stated that, in the reducing, re-using, and recycling, there is more that people could do to re-use, such as using the second side of a sheet of paper or using ceramic cups rather than paper cups or styrofoam cups. Mr. Sielaff stated that the S.O.R.T. site recycles materials that are not accepted as part of the curbside program. He suggested promoting the S.O.R.T. site for those particular products, such as plastic bottles and used oil. Ms. Campbell felt this may be overlapping the 1990 plan. The City Manager wants to see as part of the next step promotion and using public information tools. This is something that would fit well as part of the workplan. O�I TION by Mr. Svanda, seconded by Mr. Saba, to request that staff spend time putting together a piece to be distributed during Earth Day at the Springbrook Nature Center that deals with recycling, waste reduction, and yard waste management. Mr. Saba felt this should include an element on some kind of publicity to reaffirm the programs the City already has. Mr. Dahlberg suggested waiting on this until the next meeting to see what they have, and then see what information is necessary to get in the newspaper or on cable TV. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � � l ` BNVIRONMBNTAL QOALITY AND g�T�[.V [!A1rtMtTE�RTAN 1tEETiNG _ 1[1RG'H 6_ 1990 PAGE 5 `-` Mr. Dahlberg presented an excerpt from an article in the Teachers Federation Newsletter regarding Earth Day and different thinqs that can be done in schools. The article contained an address to write to for further information. b. 1990 Yard Waste Management Strategy Ms. Campbell presented the material as an information item. The recommendation was to operate a compost site in the City as a transfer site. That decision was made at an estimated cost of about $10,000 for transfer and labor for loading trucks. The transfer will be a contract service. Mr. Saba asked if someone would monitor the site. Ms. Campbell stated there would not be a monitor. The haulers can pick up yard waste at the curb, but they must take it to Anoka County and they are subject to a$3.50/ cubic yard surcharge. This will increase the cost for pick-up. The County Board will vote on the 15th. The City will meet on the contract on the 14th. They would be exempt from a surcharge because it is a public transfer site. Mr. Dahlberg felt the Commission should continue to discuss this because it is a volatile issue. Mr. Saba asked how the site would be controlled. Ms . Campbell stated this has been looked into . The costs of a monitor, equipment, etc., raised the cost. It did not make sense to qear up for part of the year for that cost. This is being done as a management decision rather than acting as a crisis situation. Mr. Svanda stated he could envision the compost site being abused. People will bring in their leaf bags, brush, etc. Ms. Campbell stated that the site will be closed if abused. Last year, there was some dumping at the site. With weekly transfers, it should be possible to keep a handle on it and respond. It does not warrant the cost of a monitor. The site will be evaluated on Friday to see if there is enough quantity for pick up. The site will be closed on Mondays which will allow a hauler to come in and transfer the compost. If the site is abused, it will be closed. � ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND . $NERGY COMl�iI88ION MSETING, I�L�1tCH 6. 1990 PAG$ 6 . Mr. Svanda stated that wood brush will not be hauled out by the haulers. Mr. Saba thought brush would be hauled but at an extra charge. He would prefer to have a fee charged at the compost site and use that to cover the cost of a monitor. c. Survey Update Ms . Campbell stated the survey in the packet is the f inal survey. The only problem she had was that she did not understand Question 22. Mary John, C. J. Olson, has done 253 surveys thus far. They plan to complete the survey tomorrow. The tally and analys�s could be done by the end of next week. Mr. Dahlberg requested the Commission have at least a preliminary report by the next meeting. Mr. Sielaff stated he had been called as part of the survey. When asked Question 9, why does he recycle, he stated because it is environmentally sound, and the person did not seem to understand. Ms. Campbell felt that was because that answer could fit into two areas and was sure they were trying to clarify. Mr. Dahlberg asked if everything has gone according to the proposal in contracting for the survey. Ms. Campbell stated that the cost has stayed within the 10� of the quote. Councilmember Schneider had added another question, 5.a., which put the cost into the higher bracket. The City Council has approved and endorsed the survey. Ms. Campbell stated that the City has looked at the cost of monitoring, and fees charged would not cover the costs. Mr. Dahlberg stated the site can be shut down and then a decision made. Until the situation arises, they must look and see how it works. Mr. Sielaff asked who would determine that situation. Ms. Campbell stated Bunker Hills would refuse the load if there were other materials in the compost. It would then become the responsibility for the City to handle the rejected load. BNVZRON1dBNTAL QIIALITY 11ND SNERGY COMMIBSION 1d8BTINQ, l�tARCH 6. 1990 PAGE 7 Mr. Svanda assumed a company would be called in to handle wood brush . d. Earth Day Ms. Campbell has received a request from Julie Jones, Recycling Coordinator for the City of Crystal, to advertise their phone book drop-off at Brookdale by placing an ad in the Fridley Focus. They felt the residents may want to take advantage of this because of the location. Mr. Sielaff questioned the charqe for the ad. This is a public service and felt it should be printed at no cost. Mr. Dahlberg asked if a copy of the ad had been supplied. Ms. Campbell stated no. She had been contacted late in the process. Telephone books are not recyclable through the City's current programs. Mr. Dahlberg wondered if there would be greater participation because it is advertised. Residents can take phone books there even if it is not advertised. There must be an alternative which would be less than the $588 stated in the memo. Mr. Saba asked if it would be possible to have a business such as Holiday or Target collect the books. Ms. Campbell stated there is a company that will take phone books, but only in tons. This is what the Cities of Crystal and Brooklyn Park were faced with so they combined to advertise the service to residents. Mr. Dahlberg felt the issue was not the cost of advertising. The City may spend money and inform residents of the program; however, they have to bring the books to Brookdale. He did not think many people would make the trip. It may be more worthwhile to say they would provide that money if a drop-off could be provided in Fridley. Perhaps a truck could be parked in Fridley for residents which will not only help get the tonnage but also be more convenient for residents. Ms. Campbell felt that most people have already thrown out their telephone books, but felt this is an area that could be developed for next year. ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALZTY 11ND $NERGY COMMIBSION K8$TI1�ICi. MARCH 6, 1990 PAGE 8 Mr. Saba felt the phone company should take back the � phone books. He will contact them and pose that question to them. Mr. Sielaff asked if the City needed to commit to a certain number of tons. Mr. Svanda stated the cost strikes him as wrong. Mr. Dahlberg asked if there are any alternatives. Ms. Campbell suggested putting an announcement on cable to bring phone books to Brookdale on March 22. It is an opportunity to re-emphasize recycling programs. Mr. Saba asked if S.O.R.T. would take the phone books. Ms. Campbell stated no, but this could be put into the workplan for next year. There is room for working on this issue. What about the cable alternative? Mr. Saba felt that if they cannot get a drop site in the City, then they should announce it on cable TV. Mr. Dahlberg stated the City would do some advertising on their own which will help their effort, but at less cost. e. Backyard Composting Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like this item discussed when Mr. Stark is present. There are a number of concerns associated with this topic. f. 1990 Workplan Discussion The workplan was discussed as part of 3.a. Agenda for March 29 Meeting. g. January 1990 Solid Waste Abatement Activities Ms. Campbell stated that 67 tons was an all time high. This is a 44� participation rate. The participation rates in the test areas have gone up to about 60� which is above that of the rest of the City. Over time, the bins do improve participation. Mr. Pressel wants the City to get bins out to residents. Initially a few bins were out and now there are more out. The bins the City had are now gone. � BNVIRONM$NTAL QIIlILITY AIdD BNERGY COMMISSION M8$TING, ILARCH 6. 1990 PAGE 9 4 Mr. Dahlberq asked when the City would have documented information on the study area. Ms. Campbell stated the test period was two months last fall. Super Cycle has been calling the information in to the City and a monthly report could be put together. Ms. Campbell stated the Anoka County Solid Waste Task Force discussed yard waste. Fridley's 550 tons represented 6$ of the County's yard waste abatement. 2. NEW BUSINESS None 3. OTHER BUSINESS a. Agenda for March 20 Meeting Mr. Dahlberg asked what items are on the agenda for the March 20 meeting. Ms. Campbell stated the agenda included a solid waste fact-finding brainstorming session, Environmental Quality & Energy Commission handbook materials, and the workplan. Mr. Dahlberg asked if Ms. Campbell had been given a deadline. Ms. Campbell stated, no, it can be moved subject to the deadline. Mr. Dahlberg suggested the Commission spend some time on giving Ms. Campbell ideas for the energy area, and then review the information at a later date. Mr. Svanda stated many ideas have been discussed during the meeting, and asked Ms. Campbell to put some of these ideas together. One he would like to see included is water usage. Mr. Sielaff suggested conservation methods. Mr. Svanda recommended using the newsletter to get information out to people. Mr. Dahlberg would like to include water quality. Mr. Sielaff asked if the City was active in the GIS system. He suggested looking at environmental things BNVIRONMENTAL QIIl�LITY 71ND ' ENERGY COMMI88ION 1�8TIN(i, ?IPiRCH 6, 1990 PAGE 10 that could be put in GIS information, such as ground water, soil, etc. Ms. Campbell stated an informational meeting had been scheduled with the staff person workinq with GIS, but the meeting was cancelled. One thing that is encouraging when looking at these topics is that they are educational. She would like to avoid getting into program barriers that have been seen in the past. Mr. Dahlberg stated the Commission can be a resource about issues so that later the citizen can make their own decision as to how they will incorporate that information. Mr. Saba would like to challenge the City or each department on what they can do for the environment. What can the City of Fridley do? They can ask what people are doing or what they can do in the departments. Mr. Dahlberg stated this could be a catalyst to the rest of the City. Ms. Campbell stated she was starting an in-house office paper program on March 13. She is also asking for ideas for waste reduction in the office. This includes a list of activities, such as using ceramic cups, using both sides of the paper, and reusing computer paper. Mr. Saba suggesting developing a City environmental policy. Mr. Dahlberg stated this would be a discussion item. Part of the things that are listed are for education and how to go about getting the information out. Ms. Campbell stated this is the same issue as brought up by Mr. St. Clair. He feels the next thing will be a demand for information, and he would like to see the Springbrook Nature Center and the City have a coordinated effort without overlapping. This is starting on the right track. Both are talking about the same areas. Their's may be more programming, and the City's more informational. Part of the discussions will be what information will be included, how will the information get out, and who will do it. b. Mr. Dahlberg stated NSP distributed information on energy audits with their bills. $NVZRONMENTl�L QIIliLITY 11ND . BNERGY COMMISBION 1SB$TIlda, 1�[l�iRCH 6. 1990 PAGE 11 O ON by Mr. Svanda, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DECLARED TiiE MARCH 6, 1990, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:35 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �%�lG ��`L`� -, �, � i� � Lavonn Cooper /�� Recording Secretary � . � CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MEETING, MARCH 8, 1990 �....___________....___..__________..�...._............_�__...._..��....____�____.._.. CALL TO ORDER• Vice-Chairperson Schnabel called the March 8, 1990, Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:20 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Virginia Schnabel, Duane Prairie, John Meyer Members Absent: Larry Commers, Walter Rasmussen Others Present: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA William Burns, City Manager and Director of HRA Dave Newman, HRA Attorney Rick Pribyl, Finance Director Paul Hanson, Accountant Jim Casserly, Casserly Molzahn Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator William Nee, Mayor Tom Schuette, UCD, 4735 Hiawatha Ave. S., Mpls. Frank Reese, 8200 Normandale Blvd., Bloomington APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 8, 1990, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the February 8, 1990, Housing and Redevelopment Authority minutes as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ACTION ITEMS• 1. RESOLUTION ON 59,845,000 TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS: Mr. Robertson stated the bond bids were received on noon on Wednesday, March 7, 1990, and the bids were awarded at a special City Council meeting the evening of March 7, 1990. Mr. Robertson stated the explanation and resolution the HRA received in the packet has been modified, and the HRA has received a final resolution with the final numbers. HOIISING � REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG.. MAR. 8, 1990 PAGE 2 Mr. Robertson stated that when the HRA had a joint meeting with the City Council on February 8, 1990, the HRA reviewed the options presented by Mr. Jim Casserly and approved the financing procedure and authorized this bond issue. At this meeting, staff is asking the HRA to approve this resolution that will approve and authorize the execution of a tax increment pledge agreement which goes with this general obligation tax increment refunding bond. Mr. Casserly stated that what the City has done is simply refund the bonds sold in 1986. Approximately $9,060,000 are left on those bonds, so this bond issue that is sold is to completely pay off the 1986 bonds. That is why this is called a refunding bond. There is no new money in this issue. The HRA is being asked to pledge the tax increment revenue they have available to them to pay off this new 1990 refunding bond. The HRA did a similar pledge in 1985 and 1986, and now they are being asked to do the same kind of pledge in 1990. The pledge agreement says that in Tax Increment Districts 1, 2, 3, and 6, for as much as it can be pledged, the HRA is pledging the revenues from those districts to pay the debt service on this bond issue. MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to approve Resolution HRA No. 3-1990, "Resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution of Tax Increment Pledge Agreement Respecting $9,845,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 1990". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 2. RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF AND HRA CHAIRPERSON TO APPROVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH NORTHCO IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME FORM AS PRESENTED: Mr. Robertson stated that at the December HRA meeting, a representative from Northco, Mr. Bruce Carlson, made a presentation to the HRA on the proposed 18,000 sq. ft. project in the Northco Phase III at 73rd/University Avenue. The HRA reviewed the building plans and the need for extensive soil correction, and recommended that the City Council set up a short-term economic development district for the purpose of assisting this project with a soil correction grant of $70,000. Mr. Robertson stated that at the February 26, 1990, meeting the City Council held a public hearing and set up that district, and that has now gone to the County for certification. Mr. Robertson stated the HRA is being asked to approve a resolution asking staff to proceed with finalizing the final development agreement with Northco in substantially the same form as the HRA approved it in December with the pay-as-you-go feature, where the HRA does not give the grant until the project starts paying taxes. HOOSING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY 1riTG., MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 3 The development agreement is being currently reviewed by Northco, and they see no problems in finalizing the agreement. MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve Resolution No. HRA 4-1990, Resolution Directing the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Staff and Chairperson to Approve a Development Agreement in Substantially the Same Form as Presented. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING �Y$, VZCE-CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 3. UCD DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR 10,000 AUTO PARTS SITE: Mr. Robertson stated that at the last meeting, staff briefed the HRA on this development proposal for a 28,000 sq. ft. retail facility which would use the 10,000 Auto Parts site plus two additional residential properties to the east. The HRA originally reviewed it as a pay-as-you-go grant; however, when it became necessary for the project to acquire the two additional properties, UCD changed their request from a$250,000 pay-as-you-go grant to a$350,000 grant upon completion. At that time, the HRA authorized staff to proceed with some additional analysis of this, since this no longer met the standard pay-as-you-go grant of 5-8� of the total project value. Mr. Robertson stated the HRA received at the meeting a revised analysis by Casserly Molzahn. Staff now feels confident that the developer's cost of a grant for a land assembly and write-down will be closer to $300,000 than $350,000. If the HRA is to approve the proposal, it will require the issuance of a bond. Staff added a 2� inflation rate to the estimated taxes. Principal payments are to be made semi-annually. The result is that the HRA would need a principal of approximately $350,000 to generate $300,000 in project expenses. They are using a conservative estimate in that they are assuming it is a taxable bond; therefore, the rate is 9.5o and the term of the bond is 11 years. Using the most conservative method of estimating the value of the project, they estimate about $1.7 million. The developers estimate the project value to be much closer to $2.5 million. Using the conservative method, the ratio of the grant to the $1.7 million is in the neighborhood of 17$. That is why this is a special case and why they did an additional analysis. Mr. Robertson stated that when the HRA was looking at the Tanurb project in the southwest quadrant, the ratio of the grant to the value was in the neighborhood of 20�. Mr. Robertson stated that subsequent to the printing of the agenda, staff has met with UCD and have resolved the site plan questions that were raised at a neighborhood meeting UCD had in February. The site plan now meets all the coverage, parking ratios, and HOIISING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG., MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 4 setback requirements of a standard C-1 zone with one exception, and this is the setback from the right-of-way of University. This is a technicality, in effect, because of the wide planting strip between the traveled way and the property line. There is more than the standard setback normally found for a commercial street. Mr. Robertson stated Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator, is at the meeting to answer any questions the HRA members might have on the site plan. Mr. Robertson stated there may be questions about what the City is getting for the proposed grant. He would like to point out that the grant does not go to the developer. The grant is more in the direction of reducing the price of the property so that it is competitive with competing sites. Mr. Casserly can answer any questions regarding the grant. Mr. Prairie asked if Mississippi Street was going to be any wider than it is at the present time. Mr. Robertson stated that on the site plan, Mississippi Street shows the dog-leg left turn stacking. It is possible for the County to build that when they improve Mississippi Street. The County has already acquired the right-of-way to proceed with the intersection improvement project, and they have reviewed this site plan and have essentially said it is feasible to do it this way. Mr. Prairie stated this is really a tight area for traffic flow. Mr. Robertson stated that is correct. This is a critical part of the site plan. That is why the County essentially required the developer to acquire more land to the east to provide enough left turn stacking space. Mr. Meyer stated he had a general concern about this whole development, not only because of the development itself, but part of this whole operation is to some day have a light rail transit parking lot on 66th Avenue and to the north. Mr. Meyer asked that if they approve this project, aren't they somehow introducing a semi-blight into a very fine residential area? In terms of when they ultimately put in the light rail transit parking area, that intrudes itself one more block into an excellent residential area. He did not see that as a very good planning solution. Mr. Meyer stated they haven't even had their discussion yet on a policy for the southwest quadrant. In order to get that going, they will probably need some of the same type of shops that are being proposed for the 10,000 Auto Parts site. They will have the Northco development at 73rd and University Avenue which will HOIISING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG., MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 5 contain many of the same type of shops. Do they have any kind of general plan for University Avenue and for the whole City in terms of these types of developments? It concerned him that they do not have an overall plan, other than to just develop property to get more tax money. If any of these projects go defunct, they are going to have many little one-story mom/pop shops empty all up and down University; therefore creating blight. Shouldn't that be part of the HRA's concern when they consider granting HRA funds for these types of developments? Mr. Meyer inquired why they have gone from a proposed development bordering on 66th Avenue and the people having to live with that development, to including one more full block with another parking lot to 67th. Therefore, they have thrust into the residential areas with nothing more than another parking lot. Should they be doing this to their fine residential areas? Mr. Robertson clarified that the graphic may be somewhat confusing and that the proposed UCD project only extends to 66th Avenue and not beyond. Ms. Schnabel stated Mr. Meyer has certainly raised some good philosophical questions. She stated that at this time she would like to hear from the developer. Mr. Tom Schuette stated UCD has worked as a development company specializing in smaller buildings like this one. All of their developments are more or less driven by the Walgreen Company that has identified Fridley as an expansion location. They considered the southwest quadrant; however, it was suggested by City staff that the City was really looking for a development to use the whole 10 acres on the southwest quadrant. With the lack of a grocery store as an anchor that would use 6-7 acres, they decided they would be more successful to pursue the 2 1/2-3 acre parcel on the northeast quadrant. Mr. Tom Schuette stated their business is retail and service for the neighborhood, and the center would be a neighborhood center designed to benefit from existing traffic, homes, and buildings in the neighborhood (approximately 2 miles). It is not intended to draw customers from a distance. Mr. Schuette stated the light rail transit issue keeps coming up as University Avenue might be selected as a corridor. If it is, the Mississippi/University section may be a park and ride, and the north side of their property might be selected for a parking lot. The east side has also been considered for a parking lot, as well as Columbia Arena. He stated they met with the Regional Rail Authority a couple of times and were told that if the north side of the 10,000 Auto Parts site in the 66th/67th Avenue block is chosen, could UCD do some type of land swap such that the Authority HOIISING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG.. MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 6 could facilitate the dropping off of people on Mississippi? UCD has told them it would be workable. Mr. Robertson stated that at the last LRT meeting, the County said they were also considering merely a"stop and ride" station at Mississippi without a park and ride. Even in the worst case with a park and ride, access to the parking lot would not be off 66th Avenue. Traffic would go through the parking lot of the proposed development around the building to the north site. So, they would separate the residential street and residential traffic from the park and ride lot. Mr. Schuette stated the development they have designed would be insulated from 66th Avenue also. Ms. Schnabel asked what some of the other tenants would be for this development, other than the Walgreen Drug Store. Mr. Schuette stated they would be neighborhood-type uses, such as video rental, dry cleaning, pizza, Chinese restaurant. They have begun some negotiations with several other prospects, but no leases have been signed. At this time, they have a corporate letter of intent from the Walgreen Company. Mr. Meyer stated he had no thoughts on the building itself. It seems like a good design. However, this plan puts the backs of the stores right across the street from the residential neighborhood. In addition, he wondered how the developer expects cars to funnel through one entrance/exit sufficiently to support this new center. He did not know how it could work. Mr. Schuette stated the driveway to the center is much further east than any of the existing driveways. It is approximately where the existing home is. He stated Walgreen Drug is a very sophisticated company in terms of determining whether a store will be successful, and a big part of that is access. The Walgreen Company is satisfied that the access can provide the kind of convenience they need to be successful. Ms. Schnabel stated she would assume that the property line along 66th Avenue would be screened from the residential area, because that is required by City Code. Mr. Frank Reese stated they had a good meeting with the neighborhood. They really wanted to let the neighborhood know what they were proposing and get their opinions. Mr. Reese stated the additional lots were required because of the fact that the County wanted to double the length of the present median. He stated the choices are tough. He stated the property cannot function in its present use, so the opportunity of buying HOIISING � REDEVSLOPMENT AUTHORITY MTG.. MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 7 the additional single family lot was really predicated on the fact that they needed it to make the project work. Mr. Reese stated they are looking at a second generation use of this property. He stated the buyer is e�cpecting the developer to build something other than the mundane. They are looking at long lasting materials which will be attractive to the buyer. They are planning prefinished masonry panels on the outside walls, attractive bands that run through the building (permanent color, not paint), and a generous overhang on all the open areas of the stores. Mr. Reese stated they showed the neighborhood that they will use the same building materials on the back of the building as they use on the front. They will put in a 6 ft. high fence, also made of the same building materials, that will screen off the automobile parking in the back. They are trying to create a controlled environment on their own area . The neighbors on the east will see the same type of building materials as the front. He stated they will build a center that will fit into the neighborhood. Ms. Schnabel asked Ms. Dacy to give a synopsis of the neighborhood meeting. Ms. Dacy stated the initial mailing list went out to the required 350 ft. by State law. Then by word of mouth, the mailing list was expanded so that they now have a mailing list that extends down 66th Avenue to about Hayes Street. About 30 people attended the neighborhood meeting. She stated staff received a petition the previous day signed by 50 people who are against the proposed project. She stated the major objections: l. Traffic concern 2. People from the southwest quadrant and down the road from Moon Plaza were concerned about the impacts into the retail market. 3. Typical noise impacts 4. Odors 5. Property values Mr. Meyer asked if the potential park and ride site was discussed at the neighborhood meeting. Ms. Dacy stated that Tim Yantos, Anoka County Regional Rail Authority, attended the meeting. No presentation was made at the meeting; however, after the meeting a number of people asked Mr. Yantos him about the LRT planning process and the prospect for a park and ride. He explained that a park and ride is a possibility, but that the decision would not be finalized until potentially 1991-1992. HOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG., MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 8� Mr. Meyer asked if all the parking spaces in the park and ride would be accessible from Mississippi through the new development. Ms. Dacy stated that is correct. Of course, that also depends upon Anoka County as Anoka County has plans to improve the intersection of Mississippi/University. There will be four lanes north of the median and three lanes south of the median and double left turn lanes. Mr. Robertson stated the County has told the City that if the City can acquire the right-of-way at reasonable cost on the west side of University, that improvement could conceivably occur in 1991. City staff asked the County if they could do the improvement on the east side of University this year in order to serve this development and then come back later and do the west side. The County said they could do that, but it will be at a higher cost. They would rather do all the improvements at the same time. Mr. Robertson stated that even though the S-2 zone essentially is site plan specific, the proposal as shown by the architect meets all the setback requirements and parking requirements of a normal C-2 zone, with the exception of University Avenue which is an exceptional case because of the wide right-of-way. So, if the property is rezoned to C-2, it will not require variances except for one along University. Mr. Meyer stated he is still very concerned about the traffic problems this development would create in this area. Ms. Dacy stated the distance between the proposed driveway and the intersection is better than any of the frontage road accesses they have along University. She realized there will be conflicts, but any development on that site is going to incur this type of problem unless the site is left as is or the scale of the development is reduced to the size of the 10,000 Auto Parts. Then, they still have the situation where the existing driveways are too close to University. Mr. Newman stated the traffic from the proposed development would have less impact than the traffic for an office building because the traffic will be spread out over a wider period of time. There will not be the 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. stacking times. Mr. Robertson stated the traffic engineers from the Anoka County Highway Department and the City engineers looked at this proposal because of the traffic concern. Both convinced staff that the critical design element is the distance of the driveway from University, which has more to do with how traffic volumes are handled than anything else. _ HOIISING � REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG.. MAR. S, 1990 PAGE 9 Mr. Robertson stated there is also the concern that if Walgreen Drug is the anchor tenant on the northeast quadrant, it is going to preclude as much commercial development on the southwest quadrant. They won't have that option of 50,000 sq. ft. of retail anymore. They would have more of some other use, office or residential. He asked the traffic engineers that, looking at proposals for the southwest quadrant with a minimum of 50,000 sq. ft. of retail and maybe more retail, what kind of congestion would there be compared to the proposed development for the 10,000 Auto Parts site? Their answer was that it would be similar or worse. Ms. Schnabel stated that if they had a project for the southwest quadrant, it would be easier to make a decision. Maybe the HRA has to additionally address the idea of what they want to do in terms of funding. Mr. Meyer stated he is also concerned about the 17$. Mr. Robertson pointed out it is less than what the HRA was considering very favorably with Tanurb in the southwest quadrant. Ms. Schnabel stated the Tanurb proposal was also a much larger proposal and a much more inclusive proposal than this one. Mr. Robertson stated staff discussed at length with the developer and internally with staff the concern raised by Mr. Meyer about the possibility of the project not being successful. He asked Mr. Schuette to comment on what percent pre-lease agreements are required by the lenders. He stated staff would probably put that same requirement in the development agreement--that they would not proceed with the project unless they had sufficient pre-lease agreements that would be indicative of a successful project. Mr. Schuette stated 75-80� of the space has to be leased. TCF does not loan the money until they have leases in-hand and executed that are more than sufficient to service the debt. Walgreens signs a lease for 40 years, and they will use 11,000 of the 28,000 sq. ft. They will have leases signed for a minimum of 3 years, but more likely 5 years. The space will be 75� leased before they even break ground under the policy the lenders require. Mr. Newman stated that while the 10,000 Auto Parts site is smaller than the Tanurb proposal for the southeast quadrant, there are some unique features that will make it difficult for anyone to develop it. It is his understanding that Red Owl has a master lease on this property from the Theisen family for many years, and it is going to be expensive for any developer to acquire that site. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Schuette to explain their reasoning for changing the request for assistance. HOIISING � REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG., MAR. 8. 1990_ PAGE 10 � Mr. Schuette stated two factors were involved: 1. Their initial plan did not include any homes, and it was a slightly smaller building. When they met with the Anoka County Highway Department, they were told that the median was planned for improvement and the plans could not be changed. So, acquiring the house added a substantial cost. And acquiring the first house triggered the need to purchase the second house. 2. The privacy wall which will be built of the same materials as the building is an additional expense. The estimated cost is $36,000. They are doing more than adequate landscaping. Mayor Nee stated he understood Mr. Meyer's concerns. He stated the Council is looking for some advice from the HRA. When the Council first reviewed this project, the numbers were quite different, the subsidy was quite different, and it appeared to�solve a problem for this property. As time went on and at the public neighborhood meeting, he heard some of the same concerns expressed in 1965. It is questionable whether the developer can make the project fit with the neighborhood. Mayor Nee stated another problem is the question of timing. Many concerns are being expressed by the merchants on the southwest quadrant. What is the idea of subsidizing a development on the 10,000 Auto Parts site when the City isn't solving the problems on their corner? He stated that over the years, the Council and HRA have said that the southwest quadrant was the third priority, and the 10,000 Auto Parts site was the fourth priority. The northeast corner is in Jcind of a subsidiary position, because it has so many problems associated with it and so little promise. From strictly a business point of view of improving the tax base potential, it is better on the southwest quadrant than on the northeast. Mayor Nee stated he does not speak for the Council, as the other member may have different views. At the neighborhood meeting, traffic was very much an issue, and he has not seen any well defined statement of solution. Ms . Schnabel stated the traf f ic issue will probably not be resolved until the southwest quadrant land is made available to the County for the improvements, and at this point, they do not know when that will happen. Mr. Robertson stated the County has said the interim solution is merely to extend the existing median further east to this entrance. That will help direct and channel the eastbound traffic. However, the better solution would be to do the whole intersection improvements which would involve the southwest as well as the northeast quadrant to provide the additional lanes. If the HRA was HOOSING i REDEVELOPMENT 11IITHORITY MTG.. MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 11 to acquire the land in the southwest quadrant; namely, the Levy property and the Dairy Queen (agenda item #4), then the necessary right-of-way for the project to be done sooner could be conveyed to the County. The County has said it is conceivable they could do the entire intersection improvement as early as 1991. Mr. Robertson stated Anoka County is aware of this project proposal and seems willing to move up this project in their 5 year capital improvement schedule to meet this need. Mr. Robertson stated the HRA is at a point where they will have to make a policy decision. If not this kind of use, then what kind of use? This property has been in the Center City Redevelopment District for ten years and has been earmarked for commercial development. As Mr. Newman pointed out, would an office building have any better traffic characteristics? The engineers say, no, it will just be different. Mr. Prairie agreed that it would be easier to make a decision on this project if the southwest quadrant was done or at least started. Mr. Robertson stated staff is not asking the HRA to finalize the project, but to approve the concept and direct staff to continue refining the proposal. Ms. Schnabel stated another possibility for this property is something a little more modest than this plan. Maybe this proposal is just too much for this property. Mr. Robertson stated Casserly Molzahn's proforma shows that with a land assembly grant of $300,000 which is necessary to support 28,000 sq. ft. of retail at prevailing rates, they are looking at 11 1/2 per year payback on the bonds. Presumably, less value means less taxes and a longer payback period. It is the classic redevelopment dilemma where, in order to get the taxes to accelerate the payback, they need more density. Mr. Burns asked if the 10,000 Auto Parts site is better for commercial than the southwest quadrant. Mr. Robertson stated that in ternas of visibility and turning movements, the 10,000 Auto Parts site is superior. Mr. Schuette stated the east side of University Avenue is the going home side of the street which is very important to the retailer. Ms. Schnabel stated the HRA needs to address the amount of assistance being requested. Do they feel comfortable with the request for this size of a bond? If they don't, then what assistance do they feel comfortable with that would help this SOIISING i REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG.. MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 12 developer or any other developer redevelop this particular section of the downtown area? She is sensing that $350,000 is more than what they anticipated and more than they are willing to give. Ms. Schnabel stated she would also like to know if this has been discussed with Chairperson Commers and what his feelings are about this proposed project. Mr. Robertson stated staff discussed this plan earlier with Mr. Commers and Mayor Nee. Mr. Commers was generally in favor of the project. However, at that time it was at the very early stage when they were talking about using the pay-as-you-go mechanism. He did not know how Mr. Commers feels now. Mr. Meyer stated he is not happy with the high level of assistance. He is not trying to tie his objection to the project to that facet. Even if the project went ahead, he would wonder why they were spending 17�. Mr. Newman stated staff is looking for some direction from the HRA as to whether this is the type of proposed use they would like to see go on this site and if they would like staff to proceed into further negotiations for a development agreement. Ms. Schnabel stated she had three reservations about this proposal: (1) the amount of assistance being requested, (2) the density, and (3) the traffic. Her reasons for these concerns are based on the discussions at this meeting and the neighborhood's feelings about the development. It is important that they redevelop their downtown area and this particular piece of property because it is unsightly as it is, but they should not redevelop it at the expense of the neighborhood. She has a great concern for the residents of Fridley and always has through all her various dealings with the community. Mr. Prairie stated that if circumstances were different on the southwest quadrant, it would be a whole different ballgame. Mr. Robertson stated that the HRA has three issues to consider at this meeting: 1. Make a recommendation to the Planning Commission on the specific redevelopment plan 2. Consider concept approval of the Redevelopment Contract 3. Make a recommendation to give notice for public hearing to expand the TIF district to include the two additional single family units HOIISING 8 REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG.. MAR. 8, 1990 PAGE 13 MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to recommend against this specific redevelopment plan by UCD for the 10,000 Auto Parts site to the Planning Commission. Ms. Schnabel stated the HRA does have to recognize that at some point, they will have to find some type of development that fits on this property, because it is just as much a disservice to the neighborhood to leave it sit this way forever. Mr. Prairie and Mr. Meyer agreed. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission can still hold a public hearing on this item and just announce the HRA's discussions and recommendation. However, she was operating under the scenario that if the HRA did not recommend this development, the developer might want to reconsider either an alternate plan or to not proceed. Mr. Schuette stated he did not think the plan can be altered. Any changes would cause the building to be smaller, and smaller means less revenue. Ms. Schnabel stated that if staff anticipates members of the neighborhood to be at the Planning Commission meeting, it might be a good idea to proceed with the public hearing so the neighbors can understand what has happened. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Schuette stated they have been working hard with City staff to make planning decisions, and he did not think they would have to defend those issues before the HRA. He thought that would happen at the Planning Commission. He stated they have far too much money invested to drop the project if they do not have to. Ms. Schnabel stated that if anything develops within the next several months with the southwest quadrant, that might change the HRA's feelings, but that is an unknown at this point. Mr. Schuette stated he was not sure they can control this property for that long a time. 4. SOUTHWEST 4UADRANT POLICY DIRECTION: Mr. Robertson stated staff has been reviewing several different proposals for a mixed use development/commercial housing projects on the southwest quadrant and they are anticipating some possible interest from a corporate office also. In the meantime, they have been informed that the owner, Fred Levy, has a potential buyer and developer for just his site. The proposal does not need any assistance or zoning approvals. If the HRA intends to develop the HOIISING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG., MAR. 81 1990 PAGE 14 entire 10 acres, then it is best for the HRA to acquire control of the Levy parcel at this time. If they do not move ahead with acquisition at this time, then they face the inevitability that the entire 10 acres may never be available and they might want to just decertify this part of the Center City plan and not proceed with it, because it would not be a comprehensive development, but small parcel development. Mr. Robertson stated staff is recommending the HRA direct staff to begin conversations with Mr. Levy to negotiate an acquisition price and come back to the HRA with an update at the next meeting. Mr. Newman stated that at a luncheon meeting with Mr. Commers and the Mayor, Mr. Commers asked that this be put back on the agenda, because it was Mr. Commers' feeling that the HRA should seriously consider acquiring the site. This was discussed by the HRA 3-4 years ago, but since that time things have changed. If they are going to upgrade Mississippi Street, early acquisition could speed up the intersection improvements for Mississippi and University by Anoka County. If the HRA is going to develop this site, they need to do it very quickly; otherwise, the increment will run out and they will not have that option. If the corporate user does not step forward, then it is staff's recommendation that the HRA go back to Ron Clark or another developer in order to get a project in place to consider so they have a development in place by next spring. Mr. Newman stated the HRA would have to own and lease and manage the property until development occurs, but that might not be too great a risk. Mr. Newman stated the HRA has the money to acquire the property. That is what the bonds were issued for back in 1985. The County appraised the property three years ago, and the estimate was slightly over $1 million. Mr. Levy had an appraisal done in the amount of $1,050,000 and $1,150,000. In looking at the development proposals in the last year, Mr. Levy agreed on a$1.1 million purchase price. Mr. Prairie asked what happens if the HRA acquires the property and nothing happens in the next five years. Mr. Newman stated the HRA would have to own, lease, and manage the property for five years. Mayor Nee stated he was also getting to the point where he thinks the HRA has to do this. If they acquire the property, there will be more of an incentive to make something happen in the southwest quadrant in less than five years. They have to deal with this corner. 80IISING � REDEVELOPMBNT AIITHORITY MTQ., MAR. 8, 1990 PAGE 15 Mr. Meyer stated he is in favor of acquisition. He did not want the HRA to be in the leasing and managing business, but he agreed they have to do something with this corner. MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to authorize staff to have an appraisal done on the Levy property and authorize staff to approach Mr. Levy and begin negotiations regarding the purchase of the property. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIISLY. Mr. Newman stated that if the appraisal cost is any higher than $2,500, staff will come back to the HRA. 5. CLARK ENGINEERING ET AL VS. FRIDLEY HRA Mr. Robertson stated his memo to the HRA dated March 1, 1990 (agenda page 5) was self-explanatory. Mr. Newman has obtained a summary judgment granted by the court that the claims against the HRA and Clark Engineering are dismissed; however, the claim for slander of title to property and for attorneys' fees pursuant to bad faith litigation is still intact. The court has set this matter for trial on June 18, 1991. Staff needs some policy direction from the HRA. Mr. Newman stated that when the law suit initially commenced, both he and Mr. Commers were offended by it. There was no basis for the law suit. At the HRA's direction, he attempted to negotiate a resolution and in response received a summons and complaint. He stated he needs some direction from the HRA as to whether they wish him to pursue this claim for bad faith, to negotiate a final settlement, or pursue it to trial to get the attorney's fees. It does take staff time and HRA resources. Mr. Meyer stated Clark Engineering is a competitor, but also a colleague, and he would abstain from voting on any motion. Mr. Prairie stated that if the HRA does not pursue this claim, he would like to not see the City use any of Clark Engineering's services in the future, even though the City has not hired this firm in the past. He would be inclined to say that staff should not pursue it. Mr. Newman stated that if the HRA does not wish him to pursue it, he will try to negotiate some concessions. Ms. Schnabel stated it is her feeling that legal staff should not pursue this. HOIISING � REDEVELOPMENT AOTHORITY MTG.. MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 16 Due to Mr. Meyer's abstaining from any vote, there was a lack of a quorum for action on this matter; however, the two members did indicate their recommendation not to proceed to trial. 6. LAKE POINTE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT AWARD: MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to accept the bid and award the contract to Talberg Lawn and Landscape in the amount of $32,850.00. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 7. CLAIMS (1988-1999): MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to approve the check register as submitted by staff. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. INFORMATION ITEMS: 8. 57TH PLACE STATUS: Mr. Robertson stated the cost of the mitigation of the groundwater pumping will be around $100,000 rather than $200,000. The PCA has not apparently concluded their review of the environmental report or concluded an agreement with Ashland Oil on the clean-up. Mr. Newman has suggested that the HRA not bring this item off the table until that agreement has been concluded, but recommends that as soon as that agreement is reached, staff contact Winfield Develop- ment to see if they are still interested in developing, and then take this item off the table. 9. FICEK GOLF RANGE PROPOSAL FOR LAKE POINTE: Mr. Robertson stated Mr. David Ficek has asked the City Manager to approach the City Council on temporary use of the Lake Pointe site on a year-to-year lease basis for a golf driving range. Mr. Robertson stated it appears to be technically feasible, and it would be a chance to recover some revenue. Mr. Burns points out that the Council might want to give some direction on what kind of political criticism the City might get for having a driving range there, rather than just open space. Mr. Robertson stated this is an information item, but staff would welcome any comments the HRA members might have. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY KTG., MAR. 8. 1990 PAGE 17 Ms. Schnabel stated that if they allowed this type of use, what other ideas for its use would they get? She felt it is best to leave the Lake Pointe property as it is. The HRA members were not interested in proceeding with this proposal for a golf range at Lake Pointe. 10. t�EPLACEMENT OF STREET LIGHTING POLES & FIXTURES AT MOORE LAKE COMMONS• Informational item only. 11. OTHER BUSINESS: a. HRA Goals and Objectives Mr. Robertson stated he had given the HRA members the first draft of the 1991 goals and objectives with some notes from Mr. Burns on what he would like to see moved to 1990. One of the items is a business retention program (the City now has a computerized business directory). Mr. Burns has asked that they do what they can to identify a profile of high priority businesses they can begin contacting later this year to try and determine their needs for the future, much like they did for Onan. He stated this is a worthwhile activity. It can be done with their present budget, and he would recommend they proceed with developing such a program. Mr. Robertson stated he would like the HRA members to review these goals and objectives and come back with comments at the next meeting. b. Center City Pictures Mr. Robertson stated he would like the HRA's approval to have enlarged, mounted, and framed a series of photos for display in the Municipal Center showing the Center City Redevelopment District in its various stages. The cost is about $200. These photos show very dramatically the progress that has been made since 1965. The HRA members authorized staff to proceed. c. Electrical Bids for HRA Parkinq Ramp Security Surveillance System Mr. Robertson stated the HRA previously approved the security bid for $10,973 for the zoom camera, monitor, and sound equipment. Included in the materials at the meeting was a bid from Royal Electric to install some HOIISING & REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY MTG., MAR. 8� 1990 PAGE 18 required additional electrical and sound wire conduit work that staff was not aware of when the bid was approved in December. Two bids were received, and the lowest bid was $649. With the HRA's permission, it will be added to the project and proceed. The HRA authorized staff to accept the low bid and award the bid to Royal Electric, Inc., for a total cost of $649.00. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, vice-Chairperson Schnabel declared tbe motion carried unanimously and the March 8, 1990, Housinq and Redevelopment Authority meetinq adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Res ectfully su itted, , t� Lyn � Saba Recording Secretary s r CITY OF �BZDLBY 71PPEl1L8 CO1rII�I8BION 1[SSTING, l�[]1RCH 20, 1990 w nrrr r.�..1r..�..r�.w w.�..►�►�..►.�..►�.�..�.�.�.r.ra►.►�.�.�.1r.r�.�r,r�rw.►.rr�►�►.��.rrrr�.tir�r�.�r�.�.��..►.�.w.r w. CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Barna called the March 20, 1990, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. �20LL CALL • Members Present: Alex Barna, Diane Savage, Kenneth Vos, Larry Kuechle Members Absent: None Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planninq Assistant Bob Ring, Bob's Amoco, 7680 Highway 65 John Kosmas, K K Design, 6112 Excelsior Blvd. Steven Hardel, 1010 Osborne Road N.E. �PPROVAL OF MARCH 6. 1990. APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, Chairperson Barna declared the March 6, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes as written. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. l. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOUEST VAR #90-04 BY BOB'S AMOCO• Pursuant to Section 205.17.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback, where a driveway is to be provided, from 30 feet to 4 feet; Pursuant to Section 205.17.03.A.(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the lot area required for one main building on plats recorded before January 1, 1983, from three- fourths (3/4) acre (36,679 sq. ft.) to two-thirds (2/3) acre (29,040 sq. ft.); Pursuant to Section 205.17.05.D.(5).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the parking and hardsurface setback from any street right-of-way from 20 feet to 10 feet and 5 feet; To allow the construction of an attached car wash and new pump layout, on Lot 1, Block 1, Lampert's Addition, the same being 7680 Highway 65 N.E., Fridley, l�i 55432 � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. MARCH 20. 1990 PAGE 2 MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:35 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at the intersection of Osborne Road and Highway 65. Directly to the south is Lampert's Lumber, and directly to the west is VFW Post 363. The site is currently zoned M-1, Light Industrial, and the petitioner has applied for a special use permit and a rezoning to rezone the property from M-1 to C-2, General Business. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner, Mr. Bob Ring, is proposing to construct a car wash addition to the rear of the property. Currently, there is a car wash on site in one of the existing service bays. The petitioner would like to relocate the car wash in order to provide better traffic access for customers using the car wash. Lot Area Variance: Ms. McPherson stated the current lot is 29,040 sq. ft. in area. The Code requires a minimum lot area of 36,679 sq. ft. for an M-1 district. Staff is recommending the Appeals Commission recommend to the City Council approval of this variance request, as denial would render this parcel nonconforming. However, if the rezoning is approved, this variance would become null and void because the minimum lot size in a C-2 zoning district is 20,000 sq. ft. Staff is recommending three stipulations for approval of the lot area variance: l. The southern-most driveway along the private service road shall be reduced to 32 feet. 2. The northern-most driveway along the private service road shall be increased to 25 feet. 3. Approval of the special use permit request Hard Surface Setback from 20 feet to 10 and 5 feet: Ms. McPherson stated the 10 ft. setback would be along the Osborne side of the property, and the 5 ft. setback would be along the east property line along the frontage road. Currently, the petitioner is proposing a 45 degree angle arrangement of the pump islands. This will allow stacking space for customers waiting to use the pumps in addition to the cars that are using the pumps. Ms. McPherson stated staff has suggested another alternative which is the traditional alternative seen at SuperAmerica or the Holiday Station store and that is to line the pumps in a north/south direction parallel to the building. This would allow for adequate � APPEALS COMMISSION MBETING. MARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 3 driving space and stacking space in addition to maintaining a 20 ft. hard surface setback. This would, however, reduce the number of cars able to be on the site at any given time, using or waiting to use the pumps, and may increase the congestion in front of the service bays at the same time. Ms. McPherson stated staff has also suggested that instead of a 45 degree angle, the angle on the pumps be chanqed to a 30 degree angle. That would be a compromise position and would lessen the amount of the variance. Mr. Kosmas, Project Architect, has a diagram showing how that layout would work. �ide Yard Setback from 30 feet to 4 feet: Ms. McPherson stated staff has pointed out that there is an alternative to create a detached car wash; however, this would only work if the rezoning to C-2 is approved. Under the M-1 zoning stipulations, car washes are not listed as an accessory use to a service station. The Amoco Station was granted a special use permit for the existing car wash in 1983. Staff can only interpret that the decision was made because the car wash was part of the existing service station, not adding to the building but just converting an existing bay for the car wash. Ms. McPherson stated the other drawback to a detached car wash is it would reduce the amount of stacking space for customers waiting to enter the car wash, and it would also reduce the amount of parking available on site. However, with the remaining 9 spaces that are left on site, the petitioner would meet the code require- ment for parking stalls. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request to reduce the hard surface setback and the side yard setback. Ms. McPherson stated that if these two variances are approved, the following stipulations are recommended: 1. The southern-most driveway along the private service road shall be reduced to 32 feet. 2. The northern-most driveway along the private service road shall be increased to 25 feet. 3. The petitioner shall incur the cost of the removal of the window in the VFW building. 4. Approval of the special use permit request 5. Approval of the rezoning request Mr. John Kosmas, K K Design, stated they are trying to maneuver and work with the site so they can get the cars in and out and be able to take care of the needs of their customers. He stated this APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. MARCH 20. 1990 _ PAGE 4 particular station is more traditional or "old fashioned" than most stations in the area in that they do service. For that reason, it has done well in this location, and it has been deemed viable for Mr. Ring to continue his business here. The drawback is the poor access to the station. In order for Mr. Ring to continue his business, there are some things that have to be upgraded. Mr. Kosmas stated he is recommending the 45 degree angle. He stated there is a median that comes down Osborne Road. This is the primary access into the site. To ease the traffic in and out of the site, they are recommending that the two corner driveway locations be closed and have the traffic come in from just the one westerly driveway on Osborne. For good traffic flow in and through the site, it is good to keep the pumps at a 45 degree angle. The traffic then goes in a circular motion on the site towards the car wash. Mr. Kosmas stated that because there are so many restrictions, they selected the 10 ft. setback along Osborne Road and the 5 ft. setback along the service road to keep it a little more loose for the customer, and it gets quite narrow and tight for the service bays. They not only have to worry about the service bay traffic, but also the customers having to maneuver around other cars. Mr. Kosmas showed the 30 degree angle pump layout. With the 30 degree angle layout, they have used 20 ft. between pumps. Twenty- two feet is more desirable. The pumps start moving down and the last pump is relocated 20 ft. farther to the south. The cashier inside the building can only see two pumps. This is not a good situation with self-service. With the 45 degree angle, the cashier can see the last pump. Mr. Kosmas stated that having cars in a parallel alignment with the building is a problem because they have cars literally coming into the sides of the pumps, which is an undesirable situation. Ms. Savage asked about the hardship. Mr. Kosmas stated hardships are very difficult to define. He stated hardships occur because of existing conditions. He stated that to make it convenient and safe for the customers, he cannot allow a 20 ft. green space. Because of the current placement of the building and its relationship to the property lines, it is always going to be a nonconforming situation because of the needs of today's standards. Short of tearing down the building, this is the only way to approach it. The current site configuration has developed the hardship. Dr. Vos stated that there is parking along the south side of the property. Is that parking going to be curbed? Right now it is open. There seems to be some kind of alley or driveway between Lampert's and the VFW, and there is parking along there. There is no well defined property line along the south and southwest sides. � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 5 Ms. McPherson stated staff has not discussed the south property line; however, they have discussed the issue of allowing traffic from the VFW to safety-valve through the Amoco lot. This has not really been discussed with the petitioner. The petitioner has defined the 5 ft. required hard surface setback from the side property line on the site plan. Staff has not discussed whether that area should stay open or be curbed. It is something that will have to be discussed with the petitioner. Some type of joint driveway/parking easement might have to be filed. Ms. Dacy stated that along the south property line, there is a curb line with gray gravel rock, which she believed extends down to Lampert's. Dr. Vos asked about snow storage. Mr. Kosmas stated snow will be stored in some of the designated parking stalls. Some major concerns with the location of a car wash in the south end of the site are they basically start changing the excess parking area, room for snow storage, and the traffic pattern to a remote building. The reason they are placing the car wash to the rear of the building is to allow cars to stack up out of way of the general traffic. The car wash is also remote enough from the driveway so there is a"drip" distance so water on the cars from the car wash is staying on the site. Mr. Barna asked if the petitioner had considered putting the car wash at the south end of the building. Mr. Kosmas stated currently the car wash is located in the southernmost service bay, and they did consider extending the building and putting the car wash at the end of the building to get it out of the traffic pattern. One of the problems that occurs is that a vehicle cannot make the turn coming out sufficiently in 21 feet. He would like to suggest 30-35 feet. They have done it as short as 24 ft., but there can be problems. If they do that and keep the 5 ft. green space, that really leaves them with about 17 ft. The car wash as it is now functions as a drive-in/back-up type of car wash. It does create congestion so the drive-through type of car wash is more convenient and a more customer-oriented type of situation. By putting it on the west side, they are putting it into basically what is a"dead zone", because there is just a masonry wall on the east side of the VFW building. Mr. Barna asked Mr. Kosmas if he was aware of any cross driveway or drive-through agreements between the VFW and the Amoco station Mr. Kosmas stated as far as he knows, there is no agreement. If there is, it has not been filed. Ms. Savage stated that if the car wash is built to the rear of the building, would there be any separation between the car wash and the VFW? APPEALS COMMISSION I�EETING, MARCH 20. 1990 PAGE 6 Mr. Kosmas stated there are two separations that occur. There is the one that is designated as 4 ft. between the car wash west property line which could be shrubbed or hedged. However, he would rather shrub or hedge at the two ends of the openings, more visible to the public eye rather than a blank wall. There is a 5 ft. separation between the property line and the VFW building for a total of 9 feet. Ms. McPherson stated it would be extremely hard for vegetation to survive in this area. Mr. Kosmas stated maybe some type of fencing would be appropriate. Dr. Vos stated that two of the recommended stipulations are that the southern-most driveway along the service drive shall be reduced to 32 feet and the northern-most driveway along the service drive shall be increased to 25 feet. How wide are those driveways now? Ms. Michele stated the southern-most driveway is approximately 35 feet, and the northern-most driveway is under 25 feet. Staff is suggesting these stipulations so the driveways are wide enough so two cars can get in and out of the site comfortably. The maximum driveway width in the City Code is 32 feet. Mr. Kosmas stated he didn't mind the 32 feet, but would like to keep the middle driveway closer to 30 feet. Ms. Savage asked about the alternative proposed by staff to locate the car wash on the south end of the parcel. Where would the unattached car wash would be located? Ms. McPherson stated staff is proposing to take the same building footprint (17 ft. by 48 ft.) and relocate it on the south side of the parcel within the building setbacks. It does eliminate the extra parking for cars being serviced. There is also the issue of the entrance of the car wash being close to the southern-most driveway, and it would reduce the amount of stacking space. However, this proposal is only an alternative if the rezoning is approved. Ms. Savage asked if the VFW had any objections to the petitioner's proposal. Ms. McPherson stated staff had spoken with Larry Rundle, repre- sentative of the VFW, to inform him of the fire code provision and the window. He seemed a little concerned about that until she told him staff is recommending the petitioner incur the cost of removing the window. She had recommended he come to this meeting, but he stated he really had no problem with the proposal. Dr. Vos stated he thought the VFW should be interested because of the property in back of the site that the VFW might assume belongs to them. If the access from the VFW to the Amoco station is closed, it will really affect their business. d APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. MARCH 20. 1990 PAGE 7 Both Dr. Vos and Mr. Kuechle questioned the need for the window to be removed at the expense of the petitioner when the window would still not be any closer to the building than before. Ms. McPherson stated the removal of the window was a recommendation from Darrel Clark, the Building Inspector. Mr. Clark's comments were: "New car wash wall adjacent to property line must have 1 hour fire rating with no openings. Wall of buildings to the west, if less than 20 feet, must be 1 hour fire rated with no openings if less than 5 feet and 1 hour fire rated if less than 10 feet." She stated staff has to visit the site and clarify the distance. Mr. Kosmas stated they are not causing the VFW building to get any closer to the property line than before. There is the question of who is responsible and who is not. He stated some dialogue has to occur with the VFW regarding the driveway and the window. Mr. Kosmas stated it is his understanding that the VFW may already be in violation of code. It is an issue that has to be brought up no matter what happens on Mr. Ring's site. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERBON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:30 P.M. Dr. Vos stated the lot coverage variance is fairly simple. Even if the lot is rezoned to C-2, it has 9,040 sq. ft. more than is required. A service station is allowed in C-2 with 20,000 sq. ft. with a special use permit. Dr. Vos stated he liked the new pump layout and the elimination of the north pump, because of the congestion from traffic coming into the site from Osborne, either westbound or eastbound. He also liked the idea of closing off the two entrances that are so close to Osborne and the service road. Dr. Vos stated he thought the parallel pump layout is the least advantageous for a consumer. People always stop at the first pump. The 45 degree angle layout seems the most advantageous because of the traffic pattern. Dr. Vos stated a detached car wash doesn't seem like it is part of the business. This is not a SuperAmercia-type of business with a lot of cars sitting around, and most of the parking would be lost on the south side. Also, if the driveway is kept open for the VFW, there is a building for traffic to go around. Dr. Vos stated he is in favor of all three variances. He is in favor of the car wash being located in back of the building. It did not bother him that it is that close to the VFW building. It �, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. KARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 8 has more to do with safety and traffic patterns than with a hardship. Ms. Savage stated she agreed. Initially, she did have a lot of concerns about the car wash in the back of the building because of the closeness to the VFW building, but she has become persuaded that it is the best place for the car wash. The best use of the lot seems to be that proposed by the petitioner. Mr. Kuechle stated he also agreed. If the petitioner is going to improve the current situation, this is about the best way to do it. His biggest concern would be the lack of green space, not necessarily on this site, but for the whole area. It is kind of a barren bituminous surface. So anything that could be down as far as landscaping and green space would be a step in the right direction. Mr. Barna stated the car wash is not creating any more of a hazard than the existing car wash or any closer to the existing driveways. He stated the spirit of the code which is basically for aesthetic views on the driveway side is still being met, so he would recommend approval of the variances. Dr. Vos stated he still questioned the stipulation about the petitioner incurring the cost of the removal of the window in the VFW building. Mr. Barna stated he agreed. He would be more comfortable with a stipulation that the petitioner work with City staff and the VFW on this issue, particularly when there might already be a violation of the code. He stated he is comfortable with the 30 foot driveway width as proposed by the petitioner. He would recommend they delete stipulations 1 and 2 regarding the driveway widths, but add a stipulation that the petitioner work with City staff and the VFW to resolve the issue of the driveway on the northeast corner of the lot. Dr. Vos stated he did not want to get the Amoco station tied into giving access to another building because of poor planning for that building. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #90-04, by Bob's Amoco, pursuant to Section 205.17.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback, where a driveway is to be provided, from 30 feet to 4 feet; pursuant to Section 205.17.03.A.(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the lot area required for one main building on plats recorded before January 1, 1983, from three- fourths (3/4) acre (36,679 sq. ft.) to two-thirds (2/3) acre (29,040 sq. ft.); pursuant to Section 205.17.05.D.(5).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the parking and hardsurface setback from any street right-of-way from 20 feet to 10 feet and 5 feet; to allow the construction of an attached � � l�PPEALB COl�IIdI88ION !I$BTING, ZURCH 20. 1990 PAGE 9 car wash and new pump layout, on Lot 1, Block 1, Lampert's Addition, the same being 7680 Hiqhway 65 N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall work with City staff and the VFW to resolve building code and traffic issues. 2. Approval of special use permit request 3. Approval of rezoning request DPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING ]►Y$, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION Cl�RRZED QNANIl�I0II8LY. Ms. McPherson stated the special use permit and rezoning requests will be presented to the Planning Commission on April 11. At their April 23 meeting, the City Council will set a public hearing for the special use permit, rezoning, and variances for May 7, 1990. ADJOURNMENT• O ION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to adjourn the meeting. Opon a voice vote, Chairperson Barna declared tbe March 20, 1990, !►ppeals Commission meetinq adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Resp ctfully sub 'tted, � �/�-< Lynn Saba Reco`rding Secretary r CITY OF FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY & BNERGY COlrIIrII88ION MEETING MARCB 20, 1990 C�iLL TO ORDER • Chairperson Dahlberg called the March 20, 1990, Environmental Quality and Energy Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Paul Dahlberg, Bruce Bondow, Dean Saba, Bradley Sielaff, Steve Stark, Richard Svanda None Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant APPROVAL OF MARCH 6. 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Svanda, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the March 6, 1990, minutes of the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meeting as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. NEW BUSINESS: a. Environmental Quality and Energy Commission 1990 Workplan Ms. Campbell reviewed the proposed workplan. In writing Goal #1, Ms. Campbell tried to incorporate the ideas presented at the previous meeting and to expand beyond the solid waste issues. Goal #2 continues the work done in 1989, to complete the solid waste policy development process. The survey was part of this; and now that the survey is completed, the Commission should be able to pursue further at the next meeting. Goal #3 keeps with the goals from last year but focuses on promoting programs rather than program changes. After reviewing the survey, there may be some programs changes the Commission would like to recommend. Goals #4 deals with providing information on waste reduction. Goals #5 deals with the curbside recycling program. Goal #6 deals with ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 20. 1990 PAGE 2 the compost site, most of which has been done. An energy focus still needs to be developed. Mr. Svanda asked where water conservation would be included. Mr. Dahlberg felt this would fit under Goal 1 as part of the environmental issues. Mr. Saba recommended breaking out the items in Goal 1 into more specific areas such as water conservation, as well as other conservation activities, household hazardous waste, etc. Rather than saying "policy", he would prefer to use another term. Ms. Campbell stated the outcome of this goal would be to develop public information materials. Rewording the goal could reflect this. Mr. Saba suggested the goal read: "To develop a complete Environmental and Energy Plan ...", rather than policy, and then breaking down into more specific issues. Another issue he would like to see addressed is lawn fertilizers, the water and dam situation, guidelines for conserving water. The same could also be done in the area of solid waste and household hazardous waste. These are all areas where public education materials could be developed. Concerning lawn fertilizer companies, some municipalities have banned certain companies from doing business in their cities. Mr. Dahlberg stated he did not wish to establish a position on the issues, but rather get information out to the residents. The Commission can act as an advocate without establishing a position. If the information leads them to a conclusion, then they can approach the City Council, say they are concerned about an issue, and they want the City Council to be aware of all aspects and make a decision. Mr. Bondow stated that, at this point, the Commission does not know this is an issue. Perhaps the Commission could identify that as something to go along with or be more specific about getting information. If it merits further work, then pursue it at that time, but not define at this point. Mr. Dahlberg felt the way the objective is stated will play an important part in how the Commission goes about gathering information. ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, IdARCB 20, 1990 PAGE 3 Ms. Campbell suggested a resource book, something that goes more to the idea of developing and distributing information. Mr. Dahlberg stated the goal should advise residents in the management of their environment or make broad statements that puts the responsibility on them to make judgments. Mr. Bondow stated that may not necessarily involve the Commission putting together basic information. It may be making information available from other resources. Mr. Stark agreed that the purpose was to get information. The Commission is to recommend or assist in the develop- ment of policy. Mr. Bondow agreed that the Commission is to provide input to formulate an appropriate plan of action. Ms. Campbell stated that more than likely Goal #1 will not occur. There should be some statement. She will rephrase this goai. Mr. Dahlberg agreed the goal and objective should be reworded. The action and technical assistance programs are okay. The goal should be to assist from an advisory position. Mr. Saba stated he would like to take a pro-active approach. Other commissions are writing letters to corporations without getting permission to do so. He would like develop guidelines and ask for approval. Mr. Dahlberg stated a Commission can ask for approval to development guidelines. The Commission should gather information, but he felt it should be known to the City Council that they are doing so. He didn't think the Commission should go ahead without the Council's knowledge. Ms. Campbell stated that individual members as private citizens may advocate on any issue they wish to by writing letters, but as Commission members, they should not take individual actions with the intent of representing the Commission and the Commission should not advocate certain positions without consulting the Council. ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING. MARCH 20. 1990 _ PAGE 4 Mr. Dahlberg suggested that under Goal #1, Technical Assistance, they identify any additional items or break out into sub-items. Mr. Stark stated he would like to see them be more specific. Mr. Campbell stated she did take waste reduction out, and felt the same approach could be used for water conservation. Again, she felt this should be an informational activity rather than a program activity. Mr. Sielaff asked that GIS (Geographic Information System) be included. This is a data base which includes information on environmental elements, land use, soil data, recycling participation, etc. It is a good tool to use from an environmental standpoint. Ms. Campbell stated she could ask Mark Winson to come to a meeting. He is the in-house expert in the City. Perhaps the Commission could also talk with someone from the County. Mr. Sielaff felt it would be good to talk with Mr. Winson first to see where the City is at this time. Mr. Saba asked if this is something the City has developed. Mr. Sielaff stated the State is involved in the develop- ment of the software for the system. Mr. Dahlberg requested that who is knowledgeable of the a future meeting. Mr. Winson or someone else system, be asked to attend Ms. Campbell asked which topics should be pulled out. She also requested help on energy topics. Mr. Stark stated the City has limited funds and staff time. He would like to list those topics that make the most use of their time and do the most for the City, ie. water conservation, lawn fertilizers, water resources, etc. Mr. Dahlberg suggested that conservation, groundwater, water quality and resources be listed as one issue. Then list the key issues with those topics. The issue of household hazardous waste is good in that it affects everyone daily. , ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY l�ND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 20. 1990 __PAGE 5 Ms. Campbell stated that this again, based on SCORE, would be an informational activity, not necessarily a program activity much more than doing a household battery collection or a household appliance collection. Mr. Dahlberg felt the issue was to gather information to distribute. Ms. Campbell stated there has been talk of an appliance pickup day like the tire drop off, which could be included. Residents would take appliances to a central location. Appliances are technically considered a special waste. Mr. Stark stated the reason there are collection days is because these are things that haulers will not pick up. Mr. Campbell stated they are prohibited from landfills after June 30. It is a special waste because of the PCB's. Mr. Dahlberg stated the issue is that there are certain things that the public cannot easily get rid of, household hazardous waste, white goods, brushes, etc., and he would like this incorporated into the workplan. Ms. Campbell stated this should include all problem materials and/or special wastes. Mr. Sielaff stated he gets confused about what can be done with what. Things change so quickly that it is difficult to keep up on the changes. Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like to present the information so that the public knows what the situation is and what they can do. Would the issue of lawn fertilizer be covered under water quality? The Commission would try to get as much information as possible. Mr. Sielaff stated that lawn fertilizers are also a health concern in addition to a water quality concern. He asked if there was a license restriction for lawn fertilizer companies. Ms. Campbell stated she did not think so, but stated she would check. ENVZRONMENTAL QIIALITY l�ND ENERGY COMMISSION MBETING, MARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 6 Mr. Sielaff asked also about air quality, ie. radon, perhaps asbestos, lead paint, etc. Mr. Dahlberg stated those items directly have an affect on residents. Potentially, asbestos could be a problem but he did not know how many buildings in the City have a potential problem. Ms. Campbell stated Mr. Darrel Clark would have information on that. She also had thought about a radon update and something on heating fuel prices. Mr. Dahlberg stated that NSP is again doing free audits. Ms. Campbell stated she could contact Minneapolis Energy Office to see if they want to do that promotion again this year. Mr. Dahlberg suggested that the whole issue of energy be directed toward gathering information and informing. They are still in an energy concern situation. Fuel prices can go up and can be volatile. Mr. Saba stated that it is important to educate people on how to cut down their use of fossil fuels. Part of the reason behind the volatility, and even behind the oil spills, is everyone's reliance on oil and its products. The educational unit done by the Springbrook Nature Center was a very good means to show energy conservation methods and wise choices. Mr. Bondow asked if there were any energy grants available through the State. Mr. Stark stated it was his understanding that the Commission was to take a planning role. It would be nice to be kept informed on environmental things that happen in the City of Fridley, such as leaking gas tanks, the Moore Lake water quality project, TCE in wells, etc. The Environmental Quality and Energy Commission should be kept informed of what is happening in the City. Mr. Dahlberg agreed that when something happens in the City, the Commission should be informed. He would like to be aware of issues that are occurring in the City. Mr. Sielaff also asked if there is information about the Rice Creek Watershed. ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 7 Ms. Dahlberg asked Ms. Campbell to incorporate the ideas discussed into the workplan for discussion at the next meeting. b. Commission Handbook Materials Ms. Campbell stated the idea came out of the Human Resources Commission's discussion of training for Conunission members. From there came the idea of a handbook and developing specific materials for individual commissions. In doing so, Ms. Campbell came upon the same problem in that the information is all solid waste. She covered programming, a summary of State statutes, evolution of policy, and a list of terms associated with solid waste. Mr. Bondow suggested calling the "Jargon Sheet" the "Glossary of Solid Waste Terms". Mr. Stark stated this is a good way to bring members up to date on environmental issues in the City by writing a short paragraph on what has happened. Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like to see paragraphs that deal with the City of Fridley specifically, including major problems that have occurred in the City in the past. Ms. Campbell asked for energy issues. She would like an outline of ideas from the ��energy�� members. She asked that the energy ideas be forwarded to her by April 6th. She can then put the ideas together for discussion at the next meeting. Mr. Dahlberg asked if this would be for all persons involved with commissions. Ms. Campbell stated, as she understood it, there would be general infonaation which will be given to all members and then specific information as it relates to a particular commission. Mr. Dahlberg stated this is a good way to learn about the functions of the other commissions. 2. OLD BUSINESS• a . Survey Update ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY l�ND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 20 1990 PAGE 8 Ms. Campbell reviewed the findings of the survey. The current method of disposal was most popular with recyclers. Non-recyclers preferred to choose their on hauler for garbage and recycling. Basically, most preferred the current system. Under awareness of programs, 80� were aware of the programs, over 60� were aware of the compost site, and less than 60� knew of the drop-off site. The reasons for recycling could be overlapped. The largest percentage who recycled said they did so to improve the environment, but saving natural resources became a more common response with education. Mr. Sielaff stated he did not think there was a difference between the two. Mr. Bondow stated that recycling does not degrade the environment, but the other saves the natural resources in the first place. Ms. Campbell reviewed the chart showing percent of total materials recycled for aluminum, glass, paper, and plastics, which are taken at the drop-off site. She was not sure of the accuracy of those figures. In surveying non-recyclers and their knowledge and interest in the programs, there are a number of non-recyclers who need more information, which seems to be the biggest factor. There were a number of non-recyclers who showed an interest in programs, but were not ready to recycle. Under the program options, a mandatory program was supported by recyclers, but not by non-recyclers. The leaf pick-up shows that residents would be willing to pay on the average of $15.28 to have yard waste hauled away. Recycling for multi-unit buildings showed an 80� interest for that service. Ms. Campbell reviewed specific survey questions. She referred to Question 10: "Which of the following statements best describes your knowledge of, and interest in, your city's recycling program?" Of 100 non- recyclers, 34� said they didn't know about the programs, otherwise they would be recycling; and 24� stated they were ready to start, but needed more information. Of the 34�, those people might not necessarily recycle even if they knew about the programs. Ms. Sielaff asked if survey participants were asked how long they have lived in the City. It is possible that some of the respondents had recently moved to the City. ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMI88ION MEETING, MARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 9 Ms. Campbell stated this was not asked. Respondents were asked if they were a Fridley resident. Mr. Dahlberg stated that 24� are ready to recycle but need to know about the programs. That's a good number and it would make a difference. Ms. Campbell reviewed the question: "What keeps you from recycling more now?" Twenty-three percent (the highest percentage rate of responses) stated they need more information. Mr. Dahlberg stated this figure corresponds with the response to the previous question. Ms. Campbell indicated that 13$ responded no service available, other housing. There is no multi-unit recycling at the curbside. Mr. Dahlberg stated the 100 number is misleading. Only 38 of the total respondents that are in single family homes who have the service available to them do not recycle, so only about 10$ do not recycle. The 62 do not recycle because they have no program available because they live in multi-unit buildings. Mr. Saba stated it is important to let these people know that they can reduce volume by smart shopping. People who do not recycle can do other things. Mr. Bondow stated this is a secondary issue. Mr. Dahlberg asked how many of the 400 respondents live in single family or multi family units. Ms. Campbell stated that 224 live in single family homes, and 263 are recyclers. Mr. Stark stated on page 9, the total number of recyclers was 269; 225 that live in single family homes and 44 others. Mr. Svanda recommended looking over the survey and discussing the findings further at the next meeting. Ms. Campbell stated that regarding question 5, page 8, rating the service, they found that females were more aware of the recycling programs than males. They all expressed a higher degree of satisfaction with the ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY l�ND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING. MARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 10 program plus a higher degree of importance on it than males. Ms. Campbell referred to the question recommended by Councilmember Schneider: "Why do you rate it that way?" Twenty-six percent of the total said they were doing a very good job. Twelve percent of the respondents felt they should pick up more materials and provide containers and that there was a section which talked about the pick- up being too early. Ms. Campbell referred to question 6: "What could your city do to get you to recycle more?" Twenty-one percent of the recyclers said nothing, 10� of the non-recyclers said to make it mandatory with fines. Seventeen percent of the recyclers wanted more schedules and more information. Thirty-five percent of the non-recyclers wanted more information. There was no interest in lotteries. Fifteen percent said to provide containers, with a slightly higher percentage of the respondents being non-recyclers. Ms. Campbell referred to question 8: "Why do you recycle?" Forty-one percent of the recyclers said to eliminate landfill problem. Under other reasons, 6� said they did so because containers were provided. Mr. Dahlberg asked the response on the question of recycling bins. Ms. Campbell stated this was question 23: "If the City provided containers for recycling, would you be more likely to recycle?" Sixty-five percent of recyclers said yes, 78� of non-recyclers said yes, 86� of other housing units said yes, 60� of single family said yes, and most preferred a three-bin stack system. Ms. Campbell referred to question 24: "If the idea were to offer a financial reward, what type of financial reward would you like?" Twenty-four percent of those with incomes of $60,000 and above requested lower water bills. Twenty-one percent preferred a lower garbage bill. Mr. Dahlberg asked if these responses were read to them or were these open ended? Mr. Campbell stated she thought they were open ended. In summary, the survey showed a preference for recycling ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND BNERGY COMMISSION MEBTING, MARCH 20, 1990 PAGE 11 containers, recycling service for multi-unit buildings, and providing more promotion of the program. Mr. Dahlberg asked if those that recycle now feel they need more information. Ms. Campbell stated yes, they did say they needed more information or a schedule. Other cities send out a schedule and information twice per year. It increases postage costs but also repeats information and increases participation. Mr. Bondow asked if the City Councilmembers had gotten a copy of the survey results. Ms. Campbell stated the survey arrived the day of the meeting, and the Councilmembers will get a copy the next day. It will be interesting to go through the verbatim responses. A representative from the company is willing to come in to a City Council meeting to present the findings. The findings will also be looked at by staff. Mr. Dahlberg asked the Commission members to also review the survey. If issues become relevant, it can be discussed at the next meeting. b. Earth Day Update Ms. Campbell stated that she had hoped to have a draft handout for Earth Day on waste reduction prepared for this meeting, but she could not meet with the newsletter editor and have a draft of the waste reduction handout, because he was not available. The material will have go to the printer before the next meeting. She will work on the material with members who are interested before it is printed. It will be necessary to send the material out and have input back to her before the next meeting. Ms. Campbell stated the Waste Reduction Strategies is a list of ideas gleaned from other sources. The handout would be modeled after the Dakota County handout. Mr. Dahlberg asked for a definition of "green". Mr. Bondow likened the term to an environmentally conscious shopper. Mr. Dahlberg asked that Ms. Campbell send the material to all members, and it will be their responsibility to get back to her by a given date. ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 20. 1990 PAGE 12 c. Brainstorm Session for Solid Waste Fact-Finding Process Ms. Campbell stated the brainstorming session has been re-scheduled for April 17. d. Phone Book Drop-off Update Mr. Dahlberg provided an update from the last meeting. He stated the Commission had discussed placing an ad in the Fridley Focus for phone book recycling program. Members felt the ad was too costly and were not sure there would be that much participation by Fridley residents. Ms. Campbell stated she has been investigating the option of a drop off in Fridley. She contacted Ms. Julie Jones of Crystal, who stated the recycler must have a loading dock, and she also discouraged a transfer because she did not have this included in her cost estimates. Mr. Dahlberg stated he would be more willing to give them money directly to defray program costs rather than put it into advertising. Ms. Campbell suggested going with another option which is doing it themselves. Pioneer Paper would accept the books, but they would need to receive and transfer the books. A bin could be placed at Springbrook Nature Center during the Earth Day activities. This would be contracted by a separate hauler. Mr. Saba was asked to present the idea to the Nature Center at an upcoming meeting. Mr. Bondow estimated the cost for a drop bin and pick up to be about $100. He asked if a covered container would be necessary to keep the books dry. Ms. Campbell stated she would need to check. Mr. Bondow stated this is the most viable method to disposing of the phone books. This is also an energy issue. It requires using energy to drop off phone books at Brookdale, which doesn't make sense. Mr. Dahlberg recommended sending a news release to the Minneapolis Star Tribune for their Thursday community announcements to advertise the Springbrook Nature Center activities. If the phone book drop-off is that day, this too should be included. � ENVIRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING. MARCH 20. 1990 PAGE 13 Mr. Stark asked what happens with the books. Mr. Bondow stated Pioneer Paper buys surplus paper and recycles it. Mr. Stark stated he would be interested in negotiating special pickups, including a phone book pickup, in the next recycling contract. Ms. Campbell stated there are some special pick-ups included for negotiating in the City's current contract including used batteries, but phone books are not included. Mr. Bondow stated it is important to have the full support of the Nature Center for a phone book drop-off site. Mr. Saba stated he would present the idea at their next meeting. He also stated that he had contacted the telephone company to inquire about them accepting their old phone books, but could not get any answers. One person instructed him to put his old phone books in the garbage. 3. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Office Paper Recycling Ms. Campbell stated the office paper recycling started on March 15 and was well received by everyone. The City has a separate contractor to handle this paper. The cost is $35/month plus start up costs. Mr. Bondow asked if there was any reduction in refuse hauling costs. Ms. Campbell stated it is too early to tell. She will check in a few months. Mr. Dahlberg asked Ms. Campbell to make sure there is something in the City newsletter about the program to let residents know that the City is doing this. b. Proclamation on Earth Day Mr. Saba stated it would be nice if the City Council would make a Proclamation for Earth Day and make an affirmation of what will be done as far as the ENVZRONMENTAL QIIALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 20. 1990 PAGE 14 environment. He would like a recognition of Earth Day, but at this point it is too late. Ms. Campbell stated there is one more City Council meeting before Earth Day, and she suggested Mr. Saba speak with Councilmember Jorgenson, at the March 22nd Earth Day Committee meeting, about initiating the proclamation by contacting Mr. Burns at City Hall and asking to have it placed on the agenda for the upcoming meeting. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Bondow, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DECLARED THE MARCH 20, 1990, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �'r�`at�cJ Lav nn Cooper � Recording Secretary � � unroF fRIDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM March 19, 1990 William Burns, City Manager Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Status of Osborne Crossings Development Proposal Jerry Farrell contacted me today and advised me that he could not receive financing for the Osborne Crossings project. Farrell noted that he had 70� of the retail space pre-leased (this is a good indication of the market interest given the recent debate of whether or not the Urban Commercial Developer's project would survive). Farrell stated that the commercial banks wanted projects that did not have any risk and a developer that has a longer track record than his. He stated that the banks determined that the theater was too risky in a soft market. Farrell stated that the owners of the building were seeking potential tenants for lease-up of the existing building. We will be contacting the representative of the building owner to insure that he is aware of our development requirements. Farrell is closing the SBF Development office and is seeking employment. BD/dn cc: Housing & Redevelopment Authority packet Planning Commission packet�i M-90-195 � � CITY OF f RIDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING � DIVISION MEMORANDUM March 29, 1990 William Burns, City Manager Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Neighborhood Meeting for 10,000 Auto Parts Redevelopment Site; Fridley Town Square Urban Commercial Developers conducted another neighborhood meeting on Tuesday, March 27, 1990. Approximately 80 letters to area homeowners were sent and approximately 35 persons attended. Scott Erikson, Frank Reese, and Tom Schuette, reviewed the revised site plan showing additional landscaping and setbacks along 66th Avenue and along Mississippi Street. The homeowners had the following comments: l. The homeowners to the north on 66th Avenue and immediately to the east of the development asked the developer to evaluate constructing some type of a berm or hill to place the wall on to elevate the wall height. 2. 3. 4. A number of questions were asked about the length of the tenant leases and the types of uses to be located in the building. The homeowners questioned the longevity of the building materials and the procedures to maintain the property. Some homeowners continued to express their feeling that there is no need for additional commercial in this area. 5. A maj ority of the homeowners indicated by a show of hands that they would prefer a Light Rail Transit parking lot at that location rather than commercial development. Although it was explained that the area has been included in the redevelopment plan since 1979, the homeowners felt that preservation of the neighborhood should take precedence. 6. A significant portion of the meeting dealt with the traffic issues and the ability to move in an out of the site, especially the left turn movement into the site and the east bound movement out of the site. Fridley Town Square March 29, 1990 Page 2 A number of persons after the meeting stated that the revised site plan improved the compatibility with the neighborhood; however, the homeowners continued to object to the use of the property as commercial. BD/dn cc: Housing & Redevelopment Authority Planning Commission1/ M-90-208