Loading...
PL 06/29/1994 - 6935� PLANNING CONIIRI88ION MEETING WEDNESDAY, JIINL 29� 1994 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC COPY �"1 ,� � �„ . ' City of Fridley AG�ENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, JUNE 29, 1994 7:30 P.M. ___^__________________�______________--___--________=___-_______ LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER• ROLL CALL• APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: June 1, 1994 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF�A PRELIMINARY PLAT REOUEST, P.S. #94-05, BY KEITH EIBENSTEINER FOR BILTMORE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW BRIGHTON. INC:: � � � To subdivide� �part of Lot 1, Blobk l, .G�ace Hig� Schoo]. Addition into�nine new single family..lots, general.ly located in the ... �.southeast corner of the Totino.-Grace HigYi School pzoperty_at 1350 Gardena Avenue N.E. � � GONSzDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #94-01, BY CHARLES WESTLING: To split Lots �6 - 16, Block 12-, Hamilton's 1�ddition to � Mechanicsville into two separate lots, generally located at�5400 - 4th Street N.�E. The l�gal descriptions for the two lots are as follows: � Tract A: Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, il, 12, and 13, Block 12, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Anoka County, Minnesota, except that part lying westerly of the east right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 47 (University Avenue N.E.) Tract B: Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 12, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Anoka County, Minnesota, together with that part of vacated 54th Avenue N.E. and the vacated alley accruing, except that part lying westerly of the east right- of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 47 (University Avenue N.E.) CDBG FUNDING RECOMMENDATION FROM THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMIS5ION RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 17. 1994 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 24. 1994 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 7. 1994 OTHER BUSINESS• ADJOURNMENT t � � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMI33ION MEETING, JIINE 1, 1994 _..________..______.,__....____...._________..___________________________ CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Newman called the June l, 1994, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 �.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Dave Newman, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Brad Sielaff, Diane 5avage Members Absent: Connie Modig, LeRoy Oquist Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Gordon Hedlund, 1255 Pike Lake Road, New Brighton Richard Larsen, Amoco Oil Mr. & Mrs. M. E. Thompson, 6212 Hillside Road, Edina ^ Darlene Brady, 641.Buffalo Street N.E. Clark Nason, 614 Cheryl Street N.E. Frank Shimek, 7901 Riverview Terrace Dwight & Karen Just, 661 Cheryl Street N.E. Ronald Swanson, 7921 Riverview Terrace Tim Lott, 2149 Sheridan Hills Road Wayzata Renee McCoy, 581 Buffalo Street N.E. Monte & Michelle Maher, 7965 Riverview Terrace APPROVAL OF MAY 18 1994. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the May 18, 1994, Planning Commission minutes as written. Mr. Sielaff stated that on page 30, second paragraph, he would like to change the first sentence to read: "Mr. Sielaff stated he also agreed the density and traffic issues are a wash whether it is existing zoninct or proposed zoninct. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPER30N NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY AND THE MINOTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Savage, to remove special use permit requests, SP #94-03, SP #94-04, and SP #94-05 from the table. � � PLANNING_COMMI83ION MEETING. JIINE l, 1994 PAGE 2 IIPOId A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Newman stated that public hearings on all three of these special use permit requests were held at the May 4, 1994, Planning Commission meeting. That record and the infornaation that was presented at that meeting will be included in the packet that goes to the City Council. Even though the public hearings were closed, he stated he would still allow public input on these items but asked those in the audience to limit their comments to new information that was not raised at the last Commission meeting. Ms. McPherson�stated that prior to staff making a presentation for each individual application, she would like to talk in general about some issues that were raised by the neighbors at the May 4th Planning Commission meeting. Ms. McPherson stated one of the issues was whether or not the Commission had the authority to limit the height of the proposed structures on these residential lots. This question was asked of the City Attorney. The City Attorney's response was that the City would need to receive testimony on a case-by-case basis regarding the devaluation of the adjacent properties by the construction of dwellings that would be substantially higher than the existing dwellings. The City Attorney said that the Planning Commission and City Co.uncil should bear in mind that there are many instances in the City where there are two story structures adj acent to one. story structures. This is true in the Riverview Heights.neighborhood. The City Attorney stated that if this reason is to be used for denying or limiting the special use permit, it would be.necessary to differentiate between the situation of the application and other situations where there are differences in height between adjacent residential structures. Ms. McPherson stated another issue discussed was the question regarding the Coon Rapids Dam. She stated the dam is e�eriencing some maintenance problems. The Counties of Hennepin and Anoka are currently discussing who is going to be responsible and what type of improvements will be made. The dam is still functioning as a control mechanism for downstream flows, and the DNR and Corps of Engineers have been requested to initiate a new flood study of the upper regions of the Mississippi River. Ms. McPherson stated another issue raised by the neighborhood was regarding sewer backups in the vicinity of Cheryl and Buffalo Streets. The Public Works Department reviewed their records. They noted that there was one backup at 641 Buffalo Street in September 1989. Nine backups at 614 Cheryl Street were recorded due to the basement elevation. In 1989, a backflow preventor was installed in an attempt to reduce the amount of backups. Since the installation of the check valve, there has been only one backup at 614 Cheryl Street. � n 0 ,� ti � � PLANNING COMMIBSION MEETING, JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 3 1. Tabled 5J4/94: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #94- 03. BY GORDON HEDLUND: Per Section 205.24.4.D and 205.24.5.A of the Fridley City Code, to allow construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe) on Lots 12 and 13, Block Y, Riverview Heights, generally located on the south side of Buffalo Street east of Riverview Terrace. Ms. McPherson stated that at the May 4, 1994, Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended that the Commission table the request pending the submission of an engineer's plan for the grading and drainage. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has since submitted a grading and drainage plan stamped and signed by a civil engineer with the requested information on the slope percents and spot elevations on the subject parcel. The engineer has reviewed and approved the plan as submitted. 5taff has added a few stipulations: • The builder shall grade th� property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, 1994. • The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the plan dated May 23, 1994. • Rip-rap shall be placed at the end of the swale adjacent to Buffalo Street. • Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines. Ms. McPherson stated the remaining stipulations are the same as those proposed at the May 4, 1994, Planning Commission meeting, the elevation certificate, the flood proofing of the garage, the fill, the easement, and the retaining wall. Mr. Frank Shimek, retaining wall to of the property, ground. 7901 Riverview Terrace, stated he would like the be constructed of cement, run the whole length and be built six inches above the level of the Mr. Shimek stated he was talking with the dam engineer at Coon Rapids Dam. He stated rodents and small animals have been digging tunnels in the levy for 25 years. He asked the engineer what were the chances of the levy holding if the water goes up on the levy and these tunnels start fillinq with water. The engineer laughed and said the chances were not very good. ^ Mr. Shimek stated the federal government is against building in flood plains because of the cost. The weather is changing. The environment is polluting the air to the point where they are now � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 1. 1994 PAGE 4 r"� getting two, three, and five inch rains. If they get heavy rains, it is going to flood in this neighborhood again. These houses are going to sit on mounds of dirt. What happens when a heavy current of water flows around these houses and the dirt washes away? Are these houses are going to break loose and tear into the other houses? Mr. Shimek stated he questioned whether this lot even has 7, 500 square feet. He stated he has a stake in his yard that was put there by Anoka County to mark the corner of the property many years ago. When the surveyor came out, he surveyed 5 1/2 feet off that stake. Mr. M. E. Thompson, 6212 Hillside Road, Edina, stated Mr. Shimek's lot is six feet lower already than the subject property, and now the petitioner wants to build it up another four or five feet. That stake has been there for 22 years, and all of a sudden the property line moved 5 1/2 feet. He submitted a diagram showing the existing stake and the location of the nail put in by the recent surveyor. Can the City send a surveyor in to check this out? He also believed the subject property was more like 7,000 square feet instead of 7,500 square feet. The City took some property for the road, so why are they giving it back to him again? Ms. Darlene Brady, 641 Buffalo street, stated she also challenged the size of this lot. She heard that the City is including land that was taken by the City under the dike in the street before the petitioner even purchased the property. That is crazy. If the City gave that land back to petitioner, then the City should give everyone back their land. Ms. Brady stated that a recent article in the newspaper stated that the federal government does not want people building behind levies because they don't want to have to support buildings in the future. The river and the creek were very high last year. If they had gotten the rains like Iowa, Missouri, and Illinois, they would have been flooded, too. It is not very smart to add netia homes in the flood plain. The City can have the petitioner sign a piece of paper stating that the City is not financially responsible for any flooding, but if a home washes away with a family in it, then what good is 'that piece of paper? Ms. Brady stated the levy was built on an emergency basis; it was not constructed the same as a well planned levy. Adding new homes in this area will only compound the problems. � Ms. Brady stated it is recorded that her sewer has only backed up once. That is not true. It has backed up four or five times. She did not call the City every time because she assumed the problem was roots. She has documentation from sewer contractors about these backups. She called her City Councilmember at the time � to try to get a check valve, but nothing ever happened. r � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 5 Ms. Brady stated that regarding the engineer's report, the engineer talked about getting the water to run off the proposed property, but her concern is what happens after the water leaves the property. The water will all come out right by her garage, and her garage �ill be flooded. With the recent heavy rain, the water pooled up in front of her garage. Ms. Brady stated that to build on a 7,500 square foot lot, the person should have 7,500 square feet of actual land available. They should not be able to count the land that is under the dike and dam. She believed that this lot is not 7,500 square feet and would like the lot resurveyed, because things have changed in the last 30 years. Ms. Dacy stated that according to the certificate of survey that the petitioner's surveyor submitted, with the area that is included in the street (easement), there is a lot area of 7,982 square feet. If, for discussion purposes, the easement area was subtracted out, that equates to 455 square feet, leaving a remaining lot size of 7,527 square feet. Ms.� Dacy stated the City does not have a registered surveyor on ^ staff. The City typically does not do surveys for private property owners. It is the City's policy that if adjacent property owners are disagreeing about the location of a lot line, staff recommends that the adjacent property owners contact a surveyor, have another survey done, and have the two surveyors go over the surveys and verify the correct survey. Ms. Brady asked about the drainage. Ms. Dacy stated the plan is to eventually diract the water on the subject parcel toward the northeast corner of the lot within the swale. The purpose of the rip-rap at the.end of swale is to hold back the velocity of water running off the driveway. At that point, the water will run onto and,down the street. Staff was at the site during the last rain and does acknowledge that for certain periods of� time, the water does pool in front of Ms. Brady's garage. However, the.engineer is certifying to the City that the water can be handled on the subject lot and then is directed appropriately to the public street. At this time, there is no evidence to indicate to staff that the drainage would adversely affect Ms. Brady's property. Ms. Brady stated that it sounds good in theory, but these plans do not always work. Ms. Dacy stated that is why all the stipulations are based on ,-� approval of the petitioner's plan and engineer's plan. If there are any problems, it will be the property owner's respox�sibility to correct the situation. 4 Q PLANNING COMMISSION M1;ETING. JIINE 1. 1994 PAGE 6 �� Ms. Brady stated she is not against a two story house being built on this lot; but when a 2- 2 1/2 story house is built on top of land that has been j acked up eight feet higher than the surrounding homes, the house ends up being three to four stories tall. Ms. Dacy stated that regarding construction in the flood plain, the federal government is concerned about the costs; however, the federal government has a list of standards that people who own property in the flood plain and have the right to develop must meet. Ms. Dacy stated the City, on an annual basis, has requested the federal government and state to do another flood insurance rate study to re-evaluate the elevations. Until that time, the City has to abide by the federal government's standards. Ms. Brady stated that if a house is built on this property, it should be appropriate to the lot, appropriate to the neighborhood, and on a lot that is large enough. Is there any reason why this lot could not be designated a green space and be swapped with another lot for this builder? It is something to consider. Part of the attraction of this neighborhood is the green space and the setting of the neighborhood, and that can be vastly changed by constructing an oversized house on an undersi.zed lot. � Mr. Tim Lott, 2149 Sheridan Hills Road, Wayzata, stated his concern is the retaining wall.. He is also concerned about the square footage of the lot. He stated Mr. Hedlund has always been trying to buy property from the Thompsons on one side and from Mr. Shimek on the other side so that he would have enough land to build. Now, all of a sudden, stakes are inside the Thompson property line where they were not there before, and there is a permanent marker i.n the southeast corner. Staff says it is up to the adjacent property owners to say the property marker that has been there for many years is not right and must spend money for another survey. His concern is that the petitioner did not have enough property to build on, and now, all of a sudden, he has enough property to build on. At best, he sees 7,200 square feet for this property. Mr. Lott stated that when they start building little pyramids on these pieces of property that have been draining properly, the way the rain falls off this property, the drainage is not going to be the same as it was. It might impact the adjacent properties from just general rains, as well as if there is that 100 year flood. Mr. James Peterson, 7995 Broad Avenue, stated this neighborhood is an eclectic neighborhood. Some houses were buiit as cabins on 25 foot lots, and there are nice homes on large lots. It is kind of a hodge podge. There never seems to have been a comprehensive ^ development plan for this area. Does the City even want development in this area? Or would the City rather not have any � � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 7 development and see that the land is abandoned? If the City wants development, what kind of development would it like to have? Does it want to continue developing on a piecemeal basis? It is a mess right now. It would be in the City's best interest to develop these lots to present day standards. This would be a golden opportunity for a comprehensive development, particularly with the development of Riverview Heights Park. What has happened to the big plan for park land all along the River? What are the plans for Riverview Terrace? What is its function? Mr. Peterson stated planning implies anticipation. It is not a reactive job; it is a proactive job. Mr. Peterson stated this is a beautiful area. This is an excellent opportunity for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to do a cooperative development, and these people could end up with new homes. Mr. Peterson stated there are property owners whose basements are being used as holding ponds. They have streets that have hollows in them; and when it rains, the water pools in the hollows. The streets are all breaking up and l�ave just been patched over and over again. There are more plans for the improvement of East River ^ Road. What are going to be the main streets? Mr. Peterson stated that about 1,000 yards of fill will need to be brought in. He would suggest that the trucks bringing in the fill use 79th Way to protect the other neighborhood streets from the truck traffic and from breaking up. Mr. Monte Maher, 7965 Riverview Terrace, stated he believed the creek is going to be the major problem as far as water. The creek is going to fill up first. Staff has said that if other property owners contest the survey, the property owners have to hire a surveyor to have another survey done. He just didn't understand why it is their responsibility, especially when the neighbor knows where the stakes are. Doesn't a four foot retaining wall show that there is a problem? Mr. Newman stated the petitioner has provided the City with a survey signed by a state licensed surveyor. The City has to assume that the individual is duly licensed and is doing his/her job appropriately. Despite what some people might think, most of these surveyors are not going to risk their license and livelihood by fudging on an official survey. As a matter of policy for the City, questions on surveys come up all the time. If, every time a neighbor contested the survey of another lot, the City used public dollars to hire a second surveyor, the City could start spending significant public dollars. That is why the City has adopted the � policy that if neighbors disagree with a survey submitted by a state licensed surveyor, it asks the neighbors to present compelling evidence to prove otherwise. e � PLANNING COMMI38ION MEETING. JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 8 �� Mr. Maher stated they do not need a three story house when everyone else in this neighborhood has one and two story houses. Maybe more of an effort should be made to combine these vacant lots with other lots to make bigger lots. This is a beautiful neighborhood and building should be done, but it should be done on the right sized lots. Mr. Maher stated that this proposal actually affects more people than just this neighborhood and more people should have been notified. There are a lot of changes going on that more people should know about. Ms. McPherson stated notices are sent to people within 350 feet outside the property line of the subject parcel. Mr. Newman stated that notices are sent out based on an�ordinance. It would require an ordinance change by the City Council to require sending notices to a broa.der area. � Mr. Gordon Hedlund stated the size of the house was brought up. The house that he would be propasing would not be any larger than k�omes that are already in the area. It is not unusual to see a smaller house next to a larger house in this area. Mr. Kondrick asked Mr. Hedlund if he had any objections to the stipulations being recommended by staff. Mr. Hedlund stated he has read the stipulations and is in agreement with them. . Mr. Newman asked Mr. Hedlund what material would be used for the construction of the retaining wall. Mr. Hedlund stated it would be an approved product, whether it is wood, concrete, or stone. Mr. Newman asked if Mr. Hedlund would object to a stipulation that the retaining wall not be made of wood. Mr. Hedlund stated he believed the retaining wall would probably be non-wood. Concrete is more permanent. Mr. Tim Lott asked if it would make a difference if the petitioner's property is less than 7,50o square feet. Mr. Newman stated that if the property is less than 7,500 square feet, the petitioner would have to apply for a variance before he would be able to build on the property. Mr. Lott asked if the Planning Commission will be basing its decision on the assumption that this property is 7, 500 square feet. r �� � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 9 Mr. Newman stated the Planning Commission has to base its decision on the available information. He suggested that if the property owners want to contest the 7,500 square feet, they might want to first ask a surveyor to come out to the property and informally tell them whether or not the stakes are properly located. If the surveyor believes the stakes are improperly located, then the property owners have no issue. However, if the surveyor feels there may be a problem, then the property owners may want to spend the money for the second survey. That information should be given to the City staff and City Council. Ms. McPherson explained that the property that is in the road from the curb of Riverview Terrace to the lot line was acquired as an easement. It was not condemned and taken over under City ownership.. The City condemned an easement which gives the City permission to use that portion of property for the road. But, the property between the curb and the lot line is still legally under the fee ownership of Mr. Hedlund, and that land can be used as a calculation for the lot area. Mr. Lott stated it might be a moot issue to acquire another survey. Mr. Newman stated that is true, unless the property owners can prove that the lot area, including the area under the road, is less than 7,500 square feet. Mr.. Maher asked if there are any plans for.Riverview Terrace that might affect this plan. Ms. Dacy stated there is a potential improvement plan for the Riverview Terrace right-of-way. One of the proposed stipulations on this particular lot was for a request from the Engineering Department for an additional easement. Because no detailed drawings have been done, staff does not know the answer to Mr. Maher's question at this time. Ms. Brady stated there has to be some kind of rule or ordinance that allows a property owner to count the easement as part of lot area. Ms. Dacy stated the definition for an easement is defined in State Statute, as well as in the definition for fee simple ownership. Between now and the City Council meeting on June 20, 1994, staff will be happy to meet with the adjacent property owners and a surveyor to review what they feel is a correct version of this lot. If they can document that the lot area is below 7,500 square feet, staff will present that to the property owner. Then the next step would be for the petitioner to apply for a lot area var.iance which would be a separate process through the Appeals Commission and City Council. Or, the property owners can make their appeal to the Council members. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 10 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the diagram showing the existing stake and the location of the nail put in by the recent surveyor submitted by M. E. Thompson. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER30N NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED QNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Brady asked for a copy of the survey report, the new stipulations, and engineer's report. Ms. Dacy stated staff will provide her with that information. Mr. Saba stated that as much as he is opposed to this type of structure, according to the City Attorney's decision, the City cannot restrict the height of the structure. The other control is through the lot size and flood fringe permi�, which is the reason for the special permit application. The Commission also cannot discuss how this area is to be planned. The neighbors have brought up a number of issues, including the lot size, that should be resolved before this special use permit goes to City Council. The testimony from the public hearing on May 4, 1994, and from this meeting will go to City Council with the Commission's recommendation. He stated he believes the only recommendation the Commission can mak� is approval of this special use permit with the stipulations recommended by staff. � Ms. Savage stated that at.the May 4, 1994, meeting, the Planning Commission tabled this special use permit request so the petitioner could fulfill the requirements and he has done that. She would agree that the Commission should recommend approval of the special use permit with the stipulations. Mr. Sielaff agreed. Based on the information the Commission has had, they have to recommend approval. If the adjacent property owners can come up with some other information and want to make a case, they can make it to the City Council. Mr. Kondrick stated he cannot come up with any legal reason for denying this request. The petitioner has conformed to all the requirements, and the Commission has to rely on the information that has been provided. He, too, would recommend approval of the special use permit. Mr. Newman stated he appreciated tha concerns raised by the neighbors. He remembered back in 1964 when there was a referendum as to whether or not this site was going to be included in urban renewal because of the concerns of flooding, and the residents of this City voted against that. He stated he was down in this area in 1969 filling sandbags. He runs through this area and has for 10 years, so he is very familiar with this area. r�'`� � d ,F""� �� �� � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JDNE 1, 1994 PAG$ il Mr. Newman stated Mr. Peterson made a very compelling and interesting argument. However, under state law, this is a special use permit; and as long as the applicant can meet the standards set forth in the ordinance, the Commission does not have any discretion. That is set by state law. If the City Council wants to do some kind of comprehensive plan and wants the Commission to do that, then that becomes their responsibility. Until then, the Commission is bound by the state law. From his reading and from. the information that has been provided to the Commission, the applicant has met those statutory standards. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #94-03, by Gordon Hedlund, per Section 205.24.4.D and 205.24.5.A of the Fridley City Code, to allow construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe) on Lots 12 and 13, Block Y, Riverview Heights, generally located on the south side of Buffalo Street east of Riverview Terrace, with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit an elevation addition to a verifying survey prior to being capped, which shall verify that th floor elevation is 824. certificate in the foundation e minimum first 2. The petitioner shall floodproof the garage in accordance with current federal and state floodproofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. � 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The fill placed on the property shall extend a minimum of 15 feet from the proposed dwelling unit. • The builder shall grade the property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, 1994. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the plan dated May 23, 1994. Rip-rap shall be placed at the end of the swale adjacent to Buffalo Street. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines. The petitioner shall submit retaining wall plans that have been signed by a structural engineer. The wall shall be constructed of concrete or stone. 9. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. JIINE 1. 1994 PAGE 12 10. The petitioner shall grant a lU foot flood control, street, utility, and drainage easement along the west lot line. 11. 12. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate the number of trees to be preserved. The petitioner shall sign a Combination Form, combining the property into one tax statement prior to building permit issuance. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. Ms. McFherson stated this item will go to City Council on June 20, 1994. 2. Tabled 5/4/94: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #94 04, BY GORDON HEDLUND• Per Section 205.24.4.D and 2�5.24.5.A of the Fridley City Code, to allow construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe) on Lots 29, 30, and 31, Block X, Riverview Heights, generally located on the south side of Cheryl Street west of Broad Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated this property is located at the intersection of Cheryl and Broad Streets. The Commission tabled this request at its May 4, 1994, meeting to request that the petitioner have the grading plan reviewed and more specifically defined by an engineer. The engineer plan did come back with swales defined with percent slopes and spot elevations on the property. The engineer also indicated that a pipe will need to be installed in the southwest corner of the property to the catch basin at the northwest corner of the property to make sure that water does not remain pooled in the southwest corner. Ms. McPherson stated staff has again stipulated that the builder is to grade the property in conformance with this plan and that the verifying survey which is required be submitted by the petitioner to confirm that the grading does meet the plan as submitted. In addition, silt fences and other erosion control measures need to be placed along the edges of the property line to prevent dirt and excavation material from going into the adjacent streets. Ms. McPherson stated staff visited this site to investigate the height issue. The property owner at 614 Cheryl Street indicated a concern regarding the height of the dwelling. For this particular property, staff has stipulated not to limit the height of the building, but to limit the location to the pad as proposed. It is in the center of the lot and, therefore, would reduce the impact of the overall height of the building if it is constructed � � �^, � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 13 in this location. This lot is very similar to the lot at 600 Ely Street, just two blocks north of the subject parcel. At that location, there is a small dwelling unit in a similar location as 614 Cheryl. The dwelling to the east, built after 1977 when the flood plain regulations were adopted, is at a higher elevation. You can see the amount of fill that was filled on that property to bring the.dwelling into conformance. Ms. McPherson stated the remaining stipulations for this property are the same as those recommended at the May 4, 1994, Planning Commission meeting. Staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval of this special use permit request with the 11 recommended stipulations. Mr. Newman stated that, again, it might be appropriate to add a stipulation regarding concrete or stone retaining wall plans that have been sigried by a structural engineer. Mr. Clark Nason, 614 Cheryl Street, stated he is concerned about the sewer system in this area. He is the one who has all the trouble with sewer backups. He does have a shutoff valve, but if the pumping station doesn't work, the sewer backs up into his basement. The sewer system cannot handle the homes that are there � now, and how is it going to handle another home? He stated he is going to look at a 7 foot embanlauent outside his door. There is a 50 foot vacant lot in back of his house so he could be looking at another 7 foot embanl�ent in back of his house, too, if that lot is developed. With 7 feet all around him, he is down in the valley. No mat�er what the City says, that water.is not going to stay on the other property;.it is going to go onto his property. Ms. Darlene Brady, 641 Buffalo Street, stated she again wanted to say that when the land is built up that high, they are talking about a two or three story house. Again, they need to build appropriate to the lot and appropriate to the neighborhood. Mr. Monte Maher, 7965 Riverview Terrace, stated that something should be done about the sewer system if more houses are going to be built. Mrs. Michelle Maher, 7965 Riverview Terrace, stated she can understand that the City has to approve these requests if the petitioner meets all the requirements. But, is there anything the Commission can do to understand the concerns of the neighbors and make recommendations on a personal level? Is there anything the neighbors can do to make a difference besides expressing concerns, because that doesn't seem to be very beneficial here? Mr. Newman stated that in some regards, expressing their concerns � may be more beneficial than they believe. The Commission has two important components:. (1) The Commission receives information to present to the Council; and (2) The Commission makes a � PLANNING COMMISBION MEETING. JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 14 � recommendation to the Council. He stated the Council does not always follo�w the Commission's recommendation: He stated some very valid issues have been raised by the neighbors, and he encouraged them to contact their councilmember. Mr. Gordon Hedlund stated he had nothing to add. Mr. Kondrick asked Mr. Hedlund if he had any objections to the stipulations recommended by staff. Mr. Hedlund stated he has read the stipulations and has no objections to them. Mr. James Peterson, 7995 Broad Avenue, asked if the City has any rules for the building pads, the type of soil, etc. Ms . McPherson stated that information would be required at the time of the building permit by the Inspection Division. Mr. Peterson stated the only other comment he would make is that the City not allow the truckloads of fill to drive on Broad Street which is already in very bad shape. Mr. Newman stated that even though the Council could impose that condition, it is very difficult to enforce. � Mr. Kondrick stated he is very disturbed about the sewer problems that Mr. Nason at 614 Cheryl Street has been e�eriencing. He recommended.that Mr. Nason continue to express .that concern. Mr. Nason stated he now carries insurance because of the sewer backups. Something needs to be done. Ms. Brady stated she also has sewer backups. Her hot water heater is rusting because of it. The City of Fridley will not help her with that. Also, these backups can be a bad health issue. Mr. Newman suggested that Ms. Brady contact her councilmember and give her councilmember this information and any records she has regarding her sewer backups. Mr. Monte Maher, 7965 Riverview Terrace, stated sewage is a big concern. The City�s record only pertains to those people who have made the effort to contact the City. There may be a lot of other people who have had sewer backups but have not called the City. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #94-04, by Gordon Hedlund, per Section 205.24.4.D and 205.24.5.A of the Fridley City Code, to allow construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe) on Lots 29, 30, and 31, Block X, Riverview Heights, generally '� � � PLANNING_COMMISSION MEETING. JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 15 ^ located on the south side of Cheryl Street west of Broad Avenue, with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate in addition to a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 823.9. 2. The petitioner shall floodproof the garage in accordance with current federal and state floodproofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 3. The fill placed on the property shall extend a minimum of 15 feet from the proposed dwelling unit. 4. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, �994. 5. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies witY� the plan dated May 23, 1994. The retaining wall shall be constructed of concrete or stone materials. 6. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines. 7. The hold harmless agreement shall be amended to require the property owner to maintain the stormwater catch basis and pipe. 8. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 9. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate the number of trees to be preserved. 10. The petitioner shall sign a Combination Forna, combining the property into one tax statement prior to building permit issuance. 11. The dwelling shall be constructed in the location proposed on the grading plan. Mr. Newman stated the neighbors have raised some very significant issues and concerns, particularly the concern about these houses sitting on mounds in this neighborhood. However, the Commission is bound by ordinances and by the information provided by City staff. As this area goes through further redevelopment, the Commission should probably take a closer look at these issues and concerns. � PLANNING COMMISSION MLETING� JIINE 1. 1994 PAGE 16 n IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWIKAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 3. Tabled 5/4/94: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #94- 05, BY GORDON HEDLUND: Per Section 205.24.4.D and 205.24.5:A of the Fridley City Code, to allow construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe) on Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block V, Riverview Heights, generally located on the north side of Dover Street west of Broad Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated this property is located on the north side of Dover Street, approximately 150 feet from Riverview Terrace. This request was tabled at the May 4, 1994, Planning Commission meeting to allow the petitioner time to have an engineer review the grading and drainage plan and provide percent slopes for the swales and spot elevations. The petitioner has submitted an engineer's plan which indicates that the swales will be adequate to handle the water runoff. Again, the Engineering Department has indicated that erosion control measures shou.ld be placed along the west, east, and south lot lines to prevent soil from flowing into the street due to runoff prior to vegetation being established on the property. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval with nine stipulations: ^ 1. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate as . part of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 824.1. 2. The petitioner shall floodproof the garage in accordance with current federal and state floodproofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 3. The fill placed on the property shall extend a minimum of 15 feet from the proposed dwelling unit. 4. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, 1994. 5. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the plan dated May 23, 1994. 6. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines. 7. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. � 0 s � /1 PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, JIINL 1, 1994 PAGE 17_ 8. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate the number of trees to be preserved. 9. The petitioner shall sign a Combination Form, combining the property into one tax statement prior to building permit issuance. Mr. Newman asked if there are any retaining walls for this property. Ms. McPherson stated there are not. Ms. Brady stated that, again, the sewer issue is a concern for this property. Also, the big mound on dirt and the multi-level home are concerns. She is not objecting to a home being built on the lot, but it should be built to fit,the lot size and the neighborhood. This proposal is mo�e reasonable than the first two proposals. Mr. Hedlund stated he had nothing to add. Mr. Kondrick asked Mr. Hedlund if he had any problems with the stipulations recommended by staff. Mr. Hedlund stated he is in agreement with all the stipulations. /"� MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #94-05, by Gordon. Hedlund, per Section 205.24.4.D and 205.24.5.A of the Fridley City Code, to allow construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe) on Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, B1ock.V, Riverview Heights, generally located on the north side of Dover Street west of Broad Avenue, � with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit an �levation certificate.as part of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 824.1. 2. The petitioner shall floodproof the garage in accordance with current federal and state floodproofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 3. The fill placed on the property shall extend a minimum of 15 feet from the proposed dwelling unit. 4. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, 1994. 5. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the plan dated May 23, 1994. I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JIINS 1, 1994 PAGE 18 /"� 6. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines. 7. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City . from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 8. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate the number of trees to be preserved. 9. The petitioner shall sign a Combination Form, combining the property into one tax statement prior to building permit issuance. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Newman stated this request will go to the City Council on June 20, 1994. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #94-07, BY AMOCO OIL COMPANY• Per Section 205.14,O1.C.(5)� of the Fridley City Code „ to allow the expansion of an automobile service station on Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19, Block 13, Hamilton's Addition to � Mechanicsville, generally located at 5311 University Avenue N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the reading and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9:50 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated this property is located in.the northeast corner of 53rd Avenue and University Avenue. The property is zoned C-2, General Business. The property to the east is zoned R-3, General Multiple Dwelling. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to construct a 12 foot by 15 foot storage addition on the rear of the service station building. The original service station was constructed in 1959, and the City issued a special use permit to allow a car wash expansion in 1978. ' Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has also applied for two variances: (1) to reduce the setback from an adjacent residential district from 50 feet to 19 feet; and (2) to reduce the hard surface setback from a building from 5 feet to 0 feet. The Appeals Commission reviewed the variance request on May 24, 1994, and recommended approval of the request to the City Council. �'�. � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 1. 1994 PAGE 19 Ms. McPherson stated the addition is proposed to be used for storage of air compressors and lube equipment to improve the working conditions and safety for the mechanics. The addition is proposed to be located adjacent to the car wash. A waste oil tank is located to the south of the addition so that limits the size and location of the addition. Ms. McPherson stated residential dwellings are located east of the property. There are residents who use the service station property and the alley along the east property line for access to their garages. The expansion would narrow the driving aisle adjacent to the alley down to 19 feet. Typically, the code requires a 15 foot hard surface separation from an alley; however, requiring compliance with this requirement would eliminate access for the adjacent property owners. The Appeals Commission did not reconimend granting that variance in order to allow the City to evaluate the nonconformity should the property become damaged to more than 500 of its value. The Appeals Commission did vote to waive the 5 foot hard surface requirement along the east side of the addition in order to maximize the driving aisle along the rear of the building. Ms. McPherson north side of equipment. �� screened �from stated a site visit revealed that the area along the the building is used for the storage of materials and The dumpster is located in this area and is not the public view. Ms. McPherson stated the addition is proposed to be constructed of eight inch concrete block and insulated with cellulose insulation on the inside of the block. It should be painted to match the rest of the building. The equipment to be stored inside the addition should not exceed the allowable decibels established Chapter 124 of the City Code. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit request with seven stipulations. - Mr. Saba asked the hours of operation. . Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner stated at the Appeals Commission meeting that the service station has 24 hour service; however, the mechanic bays are typically closed at 9:00-9:30 p.m. Mr. Saba asked if the compressor equipment will be running all night. He is concerned about noise. Mr. Richard Larsen, Amoco Oil, stated the compressor only runs if there is a need for air. The car wash will not be used to any extent late at night and the mechanics leave at 9:00-9:30 p.m. ^ Mr. Kondrick asked if there was any neighborhood objection. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINB 1, 1994 PAGE 20 Ms. McPherson stated she received one telephone call from a neighbor living near the service station who was concerned about the amount of money being expended by the petitioner in terms of light rail transit. She also received a telephone call from a property owner living on the west side of University who was concerned about signage and the aesthetic appearance. No residents from the immediate neighborhood appeared at the Appeals Commission meeting. Mr. Newman asked if Mr. Larsen had any objections to the stipulations. Mr. Larsen stated he is in agreement with all the stipulations. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the public hearing. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALI, VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 10:00 P.M. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #94-07, by Amoco Oil Company, per Section 205.14.01.C.(5) of the Fridley City Code,., to allow the expansion of an automobile service station on Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19, Block 13, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, generally located at 5311 University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Variance, VAR #94-03, shall be approved. Two pipe bollards shall be installed at the southeast and northeast corners of the addition in lieu of the five foot separation. The addition shall be painted to match the existing structure. Equipment noise shall not exceed the maximum decibels established in Chapter 124 of the City Code. The outdoor storage of materials adjacent to the north lot line shall be discontinued. No parking shall be permitted adjacent to the rear of the building or the addition and shall be posted �'no parking'� . 7. The dumpster shall be screened from public view. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER30N NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. c 1 ,^� '"� ,'� . �"� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 1, 1994 PAGE 21 5. RECEIVE MAY 2. 1994 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the May 2, 1994, Parks and Recreation Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPBRSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 6. RECEIVE MAY 5 1994. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the May�S, 1994, Housing and Redevelopment Authority minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEAMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII3LY. 7. RECEIVE MAY 12 1994 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the May 12, 1994, Human Resources Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARL�D THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ,� ADJOURNMENT • MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Newman declared the motion carried and the June 1, 1994, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Re�ectfully sub itted, � y Saba Recording Secretary � � 0 � � S I G N— IN S H E E T PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, Wednesday, June 1, 1994 �r � ,� � � � STAFF REPORT Community Development Depar�ment Appeals �Gommission Dato Planning Commission Datc : June 29, 1994 City Council Date APPLICATION NOMBER: � � PS #94-05 � KeitYi Ebensteiner for Biltmore Construction, petitioner. Archdiocese of St. Paul and Nlinneapo].is, fee owner (Totino_Graoe � Higfi ScHool) . . . � � � . . " � � ' . . � � LOCATION • . . . � ' • ' . � ' : . . ' .. • - � The .. subj ect parcel is :locat�d at � the- int�ersection. of NTattQr�iorn �, . . �. ... . Driqe.: and. Gardena • �Avenues . � �The � areas.: :to `be. plat�ed � are � located � , • . � in� .the southw�st � and southeast corners � of the . subj ect `parcel: � � � �The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are the�surrounding parcels. REOIIEST• The petitioner proposes to create nine single family lots and one lot for the High School. ANALYSI3• Parcel Description Located on the subject parcel is Totino Grace High School. The high school campus is composed of the school, a retreat building, a maintenance building, track, and baseball, softball, and football fields. A 25 foot drainage and utility easement running north-south across the property is located within the western 1/3 of the subject parcel. A public watermain is located within the easement. Located in the southwest corner of the property is a tree stand comprised of oak trees, sumac, virginia creeper, and cherry trees. These trees are located at the rear of the two proposed lots on Matterhorn Drive. This vegetation should be preserved with the exception of the removal of dead or diseased trees. , , t � Staff Report PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner for Biltmore Construction Page 2 � **Stipulation** A restrictive covenant shall be recorded . aqainst I,ot i and 2, Block 2 preventinq the . . removal of veqe.tation escept for � . � - . , . �� .: dead/,.diseased tr•ees.�� . . . : . . � ' � Located in t�he southeast corner of the property is a larger area o� woodland_which was once part of the woodland.located to the east known as����Peck's Woods".by the residents. This woodland was prob�ably once part of an oak savannah. A number of oak trees still exist, however,�they are overgrown with�chokecfierry, riverbank grape, maple, ash, buckthorn, and honeylocust. Also � located in this corner of the parc�l are two..Type 5 wetlands. .. �These.we�tlands are characterized by 90-95% open water surraurided �'�by wetland plants�. � Z'Y�e �wetl.ands are � less .than� l%2 acre and• between 1/2�.' .and .1 aere 'in• . si:ze r�spectively, � � � . � � Project Description � . � � : : " The pra�ios�d�. proj ect �� ihc]�udes � nixr� � single �• '�ainiTy fots•. . ' �Two . lot,s• •. will abut Matterhorn Drive Qn the west. The remaining lots will have access via a street "Royal Oak Court" from Arthur Street on the east. One lot will be created for the high school campus. This lot is currently identified �s an outlot and should be defined as a lot. **Stipulation** Outlot A shall be named as a��lot�� in the plat. District Requirements Zoninct The R-1, Single Family Dwelling District requires lot areas of 9,000 square feet and lot widths of 75 feet, as measured at the front yard setback. Corner lots require a lot width of 80 feet. The following chart identifies the lot area and lot width of each of the proposed lots: LOT/BLOCR LOT AREA 1, 2, 3, 4 5, 6, 7, 1, 2, 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 1 2 2 12, 667 12,370 14,848 15,032 24,491 19,628 15,891 13,813 16,170 LOT WIDTH 100 95 90 87 116 105 117 93 85 25% MABIMIIM 3,167 3,093 3,712 3,758 6,123 4,907 3,972 3,453 4,042 � n �, � �"'� Staff Report PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner for Biltmore Construction� Page 3 � . As Lot 1, Block 1 has a lot width of 100 feet, the dwelling unit .� should.face��Royal�Oak Court as opposed to Arthur Street. In � .ad�d�ition�,. •the trees' .along_ th.e side corner lot �line� Taiit.�iin . the �� '' 17 . 5 fqtit setbacl� should � be preserved to prov'ide � screenirig � for ' the dwellings located on the east�side of Arthur Street which face the development. . •**Stipulation** The dwellinq on Lot i, Hlock 1, ahall faae � Ro�al Oak Court.� . . **Stipulation** The trees alonq the side lot line of Lot 1, � . B1ock 1, within the 17.5 foot setback $hall . . be � preserved. • � . � . Verifying surveys are require.d to� �insure- � compl iance with � the . � � setback.requirements. : � . . . . . *�St�ipu3�tioa.**. . � '•. : :•p��ifyinq s�rveys� :s2ral-l.� be -aubm3ttt�d' •prioi .to. ;' _ - ' � � � � � . � ' the cappinq of �the � foundation. � � � � • ^ The total acreage of the subject parcel is 34.1 acres. 3.32 acres will be used for single family lots. Approximately .44 acres wili be used for the proposed road and its right of way. The remaining 30.34 acres will remain under the ownership of the Archdiocese. Subdivision Section 211.07 of the City Code sets forth the design requirements for all plats. These include dedication for parks, street pattern and construction, and minimum improvements. Park Dedication The ordinance requires either a dedication of land (l0a) of the area to be platted or a cash equivalent ($1500.00 per lot) for public uses such as schools, parks, playgrounds, etc. The City has typically required cash payment into the Park Dedication Fund. The Park and Recreation Commission typically reviews all park dedications for each plat request. The Commission will meet on July 11, 1994 to discuss this request. **stipulation** �, The petitioner shall pap a park dedication fee of $1,500.00 per lot (9 s$1,500.00 = $13,500.00) at the time of buildinq permit issuance. � Staff Report PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner for.B.iltmore Construction Page 4 Road Desian The� petit�or�er is proposing -to �construct a 32 foot wide cul-de= sac wi�h.a length of 2�78.15 feet and a diameter of 80 feet to serve the 7 lots. This is within the maximum 600 feet and meets the.requirement of an 80 foot diameter. .The petitioner.will• be dedicating a 50 foot right of way and 100 foot diameter, which meets the requirements of the ordinance. The road rises 4 feet over a distance of 330 feet for'a sl.�pe of 1.2�, we11 within the 6o recommended. The two lots on the west will have direct access t� Matterharn�Drive. � • � � Storinwater �Pond � � � ' � � �. � � The petitianer�.is�proposirig to construct a sedimentation pond ��� . along_the.north edge of the street....This will accept stormwater .•from. �wo�� catchbas.ins' �ocated 100 Feet� fr�om the� :intersectipri: o.£:� � . the'•�c�l-d�=sac' �wi�h Ar�htr'r �S�reet, ��The� sedimentati�on basin �will -allow sediment��and�other pollutants to."settle out" prior to � stormwater entering the wetland to the north. The City typically requires detention basins which are dry as�opposed to sedimentation ponds which retain some water. The petitioner has not sized the pond to detain the required amount of water due to the increase in runoff as a result of increased impervious surface. The stormwater pond will need to be maintained by the Archdiocese. The Archdiocese will need to execute and record a stormwater pond maintenance agreement. An easement shall be dedicated over the pond preserving it for stormwater purposes. The pond shall not be located on the residential lot 7. **Stipulation** The stormwater pond shall be sized to meet the detention requirements of the City. **stipulation** The Archdiocese shall execute and record a stormwater pond maintenance aqreement providinq for onqoinq maintenance of the pond. **stipulation** Utilities A drainaqe easement shall be dedicated over the stormwater pond. The petitioner has submitted a preliminary utility plan. Two watermains are located on the subject parcel, one 10-14" main � /"\ ,--. � � '� Staff Report PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner for Biltmore Construction Page 5 located within the 25 foot utility easement, the other 6" main located•in.an east=west location approximately midpo'int on the _ .. parce�:. �The � 6 inch. main� connects .and .�is �per.pendicul.�r� to the. . larger main (see utility map). The petitioner will install water and sewer lines within the proposed right of way to service the 7 lots. The petitioner.proposes to "loop"�the watermai� within the . right of way to�eliminate a dead-end line.� The..Engineering Department has stated that this is not acceptab�e. Connection to either of .the watermains located on the parcel will be�required. , � If connection to the 6" main occurs, a 25 foot easement will be requir.ed� to be dedicated. � A 25 foot. easement �should also be . � dedicated over �the connecti on line. The easement may �be 20: feet . � � �between Lots 6 and �� 7 . � � � � . � . � � ' � . � � *+Stipulation** "�The petitioner shalT connect.the watermain � � �, . . �, w�th either the 10-14�� or 6�� � mains � located on .� . � . . , - the •.property. . .� •� � . . . . : � . . � *+�Stipulation** fihe petitioner�shall dedicate a 25 fo.ot easement over the water conneation 1'ine. if � �` the 6�� main is used, a 25 foot easement shall also be dedicated. The.two lots on Matterhorn will require that both sewer and water services be installed from the mains to the property lines. *+�Stipulation** The petitioner shall install water and sewer servicea to the lots on Matterhorn and shall . pay the appropriate connection fees. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission will require payment of Sewer Availability Charges (SAC). The current fee is $800.00 per owner occupied unit. **Stipulation** 8AC fees shall be paid at the time of buildinq permit issuance. The Engineering Department has reviewed the preliminary drawings for grading, utilities, and road construction. Their requirements are outlined in Scott Erickson's memo dated June 22, 1994. **Stipulation** The petitioner shall comply with the comments listed in Scott Erickson•s memo dated June 24, 1994. ,,"� Staff Report PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner for Biltmoze Construction Page 6 Grading and Drainage The petit�ioner has• submit�ed� a�preliminar�4 grading• and•�drainage� plan for �he entire plat. Individual grading plans with erosion control measures clearly defined shall be submitted for each lot . prior to the issuance of a building perm,it. •.Staff will review the plans for compliance with�Chapter 208, "Erosion Control" of the City Code, and for compliance with the stipulations outlined in the.�ection "Wetlands" oi the staff report for wetland . . preservation. - . - . • **8tipuiation** � Individual gradinq.and erosioa�control�plaans � _ _ . � � �� . � . shall • �be � submitted €or _ each 1ot prior to ' the � . � � � . ' :issuance :. of a buildinq� permit. � � � � e � � . ..Wetlands� . • . ... � . � � . � � � . .Two ��T'ype � �5 . wetlands .�are � located' on� �tlie � property� �in � the sbuthea�st � . . �� corner. �The wetlands were delineated as required by the��0-4 � � Overlay Ordinance and State Statute. Staff and the City's ^ consultant reviewed the delineation with a site visit on June 20, 1994. The consultant confirmed the delineation as being accurate. The consultant stated that the delineation was� "conservative"; the delineation line was well outside the edge of the wetland. It was observed that improper fill of the wetland to the east has occurred. Barrels, sand, construction debris, grass clippings, � etc., have been dumped in the wetland. These items should be removed and the wetland restored. **Stipulation** The improper fill in the wetland shall be removed and the wetland restored. The petitioner is not proposing to drain or fill the wetlands. Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1 will have portions of wetlands on them. In reviewing the plat, staff has the following recommended stipulations to preserve and protect the wetlands on these lots: **stipulation** Restrictive covenants shall be recorded aqainst Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1 preventinq any filling of wetlands includinq brush, ' grass clippings, trash, etc. Accessory structures and footinqs for decks, additions, gazebos, etc. shall not be located in the wetlands as delineated on the plat. ^ A � Staff Report PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner for Biltmore Construction Page 7 **Stipula�ion** No qradinq shall occur below the elevation of . . 948 on Lots 5 and 6, Block 1._ No�qradinq • • . . � . . shall . occi�r below . the el�vation � of . 953 � on Lo.t . 7, Block�i. � � � **stipulatiQn** .. The dwellinqs.on_Lots 5,•6, and 7, Block 1 �� •�shall be located a mauimum 10'feet from the � lot line opposite the wetland. Trees . As was stated ear�ier,.a number of.mature trees.•exist in each par.t of the proposed . plat.� A numbe� o-f tre.es wiT�. need �o be � removed.in order to const'ruct.the proposed�ro�d•. The developer � . has � c�earl.y marked the constivction limits on���the proposed �� � .gradirig plan. The construction limits follow the right�of way . � � li.i�e� and .in��ude .the � �edimenta�ian `�ond oai:.the north�, �: 6ection �. -� 211.�08:03-of� the City• Code �equires"'a deve�oper=.to.p.�ai�t:�.two �� � .trees per lot for.eacYi residential.subdivision.� �' +�Stipulation** Two street trees per lot shall be planted by the petitioner. � The trees remaining on the lots should not be clear cut. The grading plan submitted for each individual lot should inventory all trees 4" in caliper or greater on the lot and indicate which trees are to be removed for construction of the dwelling. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a building permit. **stipulation** The qradinq plans for each lot shall indicate all trees 4�� or qreater in caliper located on the lot and shall indiaate which trees are to be removed to allow construction of the dwellinq. **Stipulation** The lots shall not be clear cut. Environmental Assessment Worksheet The neighborhood has expressed concerns regarding the environmental impact of the proposed development (see letter from Friends of Innsbruck Park). They have informed staff that they will petition for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) to be completed. If it is determined that an EAW is required, the rules state that no action can be taken on the project by the City. The Planning Commission should table action, including conducting the public hearing, on the request until the EAW is complete. Staff will provide a verbal update regarding the EAW � Staff Report PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner �or Biltmore Construction . � � Page 8 process at the meeting. . � ��'RECOPIIKENDATION/STIPULATEONS: . � Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: � � • . ' • . � 1. A.restrictive covenant shall be recordeii against.Lot 1 an.d 2, Block 2 preventing.the removal of vegetation except for dead/diseased trees: - � � � 2. Outlot A��shail be named as a"lot''•�.�in .the •pl.at. � .�• 3. The dwelling•on Lot 1, Block 1, s�iall fa�e�ROyal Oak Court. 4.� The trees . al�ong� the �side. lot_ l�ine. of Lot 1, Block l, withiri . . �.,..the: �1•7..5•'•foot setb�cl�..sh��l.l :b�.. �reserved:.: • - : • '. . . � . . 5. C� 7. 8. � Verif�ring surveys shall be submitted prior to the capping of the foundation. The petitioner shall pay a park dedieation fee of $1500.00 per lot (9 x$1,500 =$13,500)at the time of building permit issuance. The stormwater pond shall be sized to meet the detention requirements of the City. The Archdiocese shall execute and record a stormwater pond maintenance agreement providing for ongoing maintenance of the pond. A drainage easement shall be dedicated over the stormwater pond. 10. The petitioner shall connect the watermain with either the 10-14" or 6" mains located on the property. 11. The petitioner shall dedicate a 25 foot easement over the water connection line. If the 6" main is used, a 25 foot easement shall also be dedicated. 12. The petitioner shall install water and sewer services to the lots on Matterhorn and shall pay the appropriate connection fees. � a � /"� T e � Staff Report � �PS #94-05, Keith Ebensteiner for Biltmore Construction Page 9 . 13. SAC fees shall be�paid at the time of building permit issuance. � 14.-� The petitiorier shall� comply�witti the comments�listed in � Scott Erickson's memo dated June 24, 1994. 15 .. Individ,ual . grading and erosion control plans• shall, be �. . submitted for�each lot prior to the issuance of a buil�ding permit. . . . � 16. : .� 17- . 18 . /"'� 19. � The improp�r fill iri the wetland shall be removed and the wetland restored. � k2estr.ictive �covenants shall be recorded against�. Lots 5, .6, ... and 7, . Block 1 p'reventing any �il�lirig of� w�tlands �inc].uding ' brush, grass clippings, trash,�etc. Accessory structu�e� and footings for decks;•.additions�;• gazebos, .etc.. .sha�ll� not ���� .� � be� lacated �. 'in �• tl�e wetl�ands as, � 'del�ineated: � bri•� :th,e • p� it . . `� • " . Nb grading sha11 occur below the elevation�of 948 on Lo�s 5� and 6, Block 1. No g�rading shall occur below the elevation of 953 on Lot 7, Block l. The dwellings on Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1 shall be located a maximum of 10 feet from the lot line opposite the wetland. 20. Two street trees per lot shall be planted by the petitioner. 21. The grading plans for each lot shall indicate all trees 4" or greater in caliper located on the lot and shall indicate which trees are to be removed to allow construction of the dwelling. 22. The lots shall not be clear cut. P.S. 1�94-OS Keith Ebensteiner LOCATIOIV MAP �\ � ' ' P.S. ��94=05 a Keith Ebensteiner _ , ; � - ; F ' �, �, 1 Miaw�l 2 � � � � - — _. __ __ �. ; , �, � B ' H�L��R T ORIVE � � '9 1. 5 � 9 � a � L; S 4 J. 1 � �y ' Z 1� b 9 y, : � � a . 70 � 0 � r� • �i ' o �� i! � � J r B Q iJ K i7 �o . /J '� 4 �� S • � V h �� _ P �=a� �'� " �1 D���� . r, � _� ; �, � f .� p� p HILLCREST 2S N zs `I` �, s �tb .. i� ro,. fM�SORE, �;•. � g — „ e�z . � re ,/ � 1 • .�,.AK E �• J� �,V _ + �t .0 / ?' z� ,o s 1 C%� 2 ac � �EAC ,�i,`' �ar r< "` ` � . • - �p 1, 4 N L / ' "i'' � ,``� P „ � , �� � El L A D . . . °Q :. ,o r - z � . A � .",� s� . . ' , ' .. ��� � s f 1 I 1� P 1 ` ' . . r.C; �►� 4rAJF� My ! 'e � � „a �,�_ OR�' GP � � _ • , t � �,p rr z � a, : M � �, vF �� L i 0 l� , G' �%�N � ` ,� 3 m a i g� ,�, �� . i ..r � • ,Q•� . . � J• •,; ! , • • � .1- , . • GA I�A � P � . . i� 3 � Z •a, 3, �s ar a. .�, �� s3 i+r +� ' . . 1Ea � � �' -- ' ' W ? p I . 6 � 3 � 3 � .c z. � > j . � '3B ' ` • . f E ', � q �' , � ' ��9 � ° s . ' ` � G!'irACE . H1G .H. .. � -_ �;;3 a� ° �;,;�4}�..' ^. ,,�' .' ' j ' � � ' . .. . . ' . _0 .4••3 . 1� 6 f ? 5 ��� � /3 Z � 6 . , • ' �i. �� <. . ., � �,� B 4 ,r _ _ �2 . / . . . . ; �N ' �.•� . �� .I #i c � A ' ;� '' . � . " W . ` B SCfI�OL .. . ADOlT/ON � � . � � P K . ' /L : -c. . 9- . , . � . � . . � . �, � , t'' ' ' � : �. _ _ ' y /O. . . .. • • • • • ,�, ' . �11 ���73� ,� - „ � � Are��� . Y� - z � � � �°�B - �j-� of Plat ,�S�R - � a �� �:: �� ,.� s e.�� ,i 1, . 1� . _._ � � �., v�tcA6ES � H R + l. � i�i� I[i37 JB��9;4c�4/'tZ / i2 3 4 S,i '1 8 ,�II • • • � !.f •�� � • �' • • �e � e � � S 4 • • � fHa Y A �b ° z -- " ORT • • •��� �. 9 4 � 6 S a 3.Z , i'z •11Z4 Tf � � i7. � 3' � � •�����,jJo}���a •.��_ J—� g 1 � 5 4 • �•••�'��a s .ar1 GY7 � ¢ t� 2 �� hi 6 9. rio 3� F � �I�y}�g/iC� �•�.� I,J�C11 3 � � � �17. �Fi • � �j , 3 �5 11 I 1 •� ok�vE � n 4 � a. 9 ,'';''. .. 8������z � RTH �. /Y� Z. c� ?` 5 . �.5 4� NSeR�c �3 • 5 •�� �• • i•������� ' ,4 �'� 3 � � ; 3 � �C � ^Nr7'�,.s, • z • • ♦ 1�� - - ^ : a ; t L,r a i • • t � _r ='Aflrf , � A :+, , � oq . +. �r���f � � - � ' • '� 5 i L a • • � ►� �� //��}^-{ � `�rJVj / - � ' ' ` `Z -� � ..,. �5�'���163��'.�_ .' . . 'ipl�.�. r .i / ��V C � 4 �D S It 2 .1•::.' � S •A�• • •�r �� 3 .•.3 !'1.�:: �y 1 � ? ^ � . a ° = � � .� .�� T- � � u ° /�/ 4 S �� ;3�! i �; � � • • • �+-J� "'�'.� Q �- �.2 q �`� .� - Q" . , � , � 9 s Q � F A RR .: . �� - � 3 n p . 5 : c r T ;� • � : rr �: 9 � y � ���G. �� b d� ��6��� �` p PN_ L A K E L A D< ' ,, �'� I 'r •..'' ;.�' ' Jt l v1L� . �`�2 _�t. ''- ,t • ' �.. ._ E��` : � .; . . -, . _ .• 5�1 R `:� _� j o//ey view z 'P� .e HEIGHTS : CArislion DISTRICT LEGEND � 9 " 6 � ChuiCh i � : -�_Hrt�_yy����,� ; � "T���� 4 Z R-1 ONE FAYILY OWG'S ❑ M-1 LIONT INOUSTRIAL ❑ � p-1 TWO fFMILY OWO'8 ❑ M-2 XEAVY INOUSTXIAL � �/� R-3 QEN. YULTIPIE OWD'S 0 vUD GI�NNED UNit DEY. 0 �0 L1�� ❑ S-1 NrDE VRRK NEICNBORNO00 ❑ R-1 MOBIIE NOME VARK P PUBLIC FACIUTIES ❑ S-2 RECEVEIOPMENT DISTRIC7 0 � C-1 LOCAL BUS�NESS. � O-1 CREER 8 RIVEX PAfSERVATION � ('� C � I//-L -� C-2 CENENAL BUSINESS � O-2 CRITICAL AREA Q J I�J J � � � � C-7 OENERAL SNOPVING �.{ �• � 4 .. � �� � • � � /. 41 C'H1 GENENRL OFFICE ❑ V<CATEO STpEETS �I - lA � R — zor�iNG nnAP� .. . :" � ,L e-- _� „ ;,, 8�� 8AR0 /1 -- i�l ; 5 e �° AVENUE c 5O � s y W . �`'y.' ' , O . � � 6,� ..L .�. �f O . \ , 2 . 2 W . � . i � . . � --� , i� ' -,.— � P.S. �F9 5 'I! _ �. i� - ��' �_ 6 Keith st�:�;�r , ao a �� .� s 6�� � 'a� AVENUE � " � ' N T ;; �D ■IIi� ' • � . `` . . . . . ' . . ' � . �� , � " . . . ��� • � \� 49� . .. . .� ' � �' -- _: .6+� . � ° � � - . • , , . . . � .. . �+ . . ,. . y - IkNE . �_ . � •�� NORTH DAN4B • �.BT . . � . \ • • .. . . , F A • . . . � ' . . . • � 9p � '�a � , _ 9P ORNE : " • . ' • y � PRIVA7E .. . � _ . . : . .. . . • TR �ct �: �' LlNES ' � .. � z i.. .� ..• •. . . � • . � .. ' •- . �'�,oRrN' : • ,`. �r .y . • m • ' ., . ..� � REOIS T � . ; �„ i 6" x 6 ~ � � 1 S Q 'H�'SgR��K o Da' � t; 6a 3g �•�, �z" _ . � N � /, � f � � � NR OBER-: ��i i a , t ' ,� � . . , W m �/ 6 i �d �� ;-IR.- '. � U i i ti_✓��•� 0 � j�� / � 61/ 2 H = y., / ��-'_ 1 1 ��_ . T; � W � P ' � � Q O O ' �:..1� !� li'y�j 1� � tl + �a_ _s !WE 'J..L ' �6� �I� o � i a � � r , � j'� o� 4 � i F .� - 1� i� j t d . � i; , ? _ . ; �,r� � '��. • -�� � � W ' i . � i 4 _� J -y/� � i r � . �90. OBEAUN CIR. r�j � � ; ` (��� t �, PRIVATE r'l� m'' ~. � i /Q h l „ � . � � s --- LINES �; P ti �2 °� 8�� � �w.-envci •:� � '� --,,�����` �Y <;, ��� � I O,NG _ ���e .i: Q. B�ENNER /O p Bp � FASS � �e. c; �, �; J �', x:� �' \` ACi — � �'.`. 6° � \l e6 NNCa • � ` ,...�..�_ _. � _. b r S31/2 COURT ___-� p�r bAV. PAS� � 6HENNER i`. PAS9 ''�� . � PASS �• �� SEE AS BUILT � y 12u FOR DETAIL I Fo. � TILITY MATT. CIR. iKrW00D LANE N.E. • . � � � W � _ 7 � �� 11 � 1/ � y , �.. 6 -_ 6— __ .�E � LE z o.. a S o�_ W . W � �r--- � r W i I . TOP E ELEV.. � �:�'�ti-��::-:. `�% y aC �' � t- � y I 93. O- 9. 3 � � ',: ,:• v~i � W = � OVERFI BERN , . �,�''�,;V� u 3 ' (p1 �' � � 6� �'i,�, E RD. -.'m��' � � ¢ �D � � p - l`-`;.;, u � � p,o�Vf F,�i�. ;.:';t:`-".''':. • WINOEMERE 6 v 1 Z o. 1pq.LM�N CIR. EAST .'•��:". x � � 5 3 `,y ,,':Y t;c. � � \ o �a� z .,`. S0� � - �fi � �1 = � '~^ � � u � •_ . Oq o � W Z 6 f � �.. :� �� " 4 W W .. �. . 1, ¢ ._ r ' GlAC1ER- �� � / /4� TR�<i . °%' ' ��s � '��!.. •- . .1•. Glal� . rw .. u e i:• ;^ •' s,•:iI ' %:7''�i. ,. :.i a-! _ '>�cb'r'� . -. _ .. f �fin:'a.'=: .,,. j. •� : ,1:. � � '• i ...-�1�'_-..i .<: :`' :�:�.: %'�'::•.:�> . '�.� : vi�uq:y^'N�O� r1,VIV�.�Cf.1Y�11.�O�y'f`..:�:� • —,,;. ��-_�;.- ;.� : :,, :�w,�;+,.�;s: -t+.;; ::: :�x,r - �« -�• - ;.�•• - ' :-0'� r�,9,•�a ••�;.5 •@• .aj,:�y"� e9.-.l: • t ,.r•a�. :r p:.. �4.yi... , . `":a'.�f^q,.l� . �r h� . l. : ��.'t• .t•�rr+� 'h:.. �e,�s � � �,4 ��::�i ;4�:��qt�+�c�' rTdi��j����t Y'CoJncil:;t�8e �p"�e �i��:�r{�o�`ma(ie;�:yo��;� � ,,,�Te�;Fc#eyes-��.��-5,�f'$3�5;�#:�;.�.r=�;�`*� r .� .a;,� ,s . S�•. -'t f.i•. r a 4 } � r p. 'i�j.� � T"aP•qP : .eS J.r e. S. }a.. a •a.� � dy -A- �'�e� .I'i?�'��. jC L .p�'....q�'^. •Mr e �� � G ,�' ���. y � � � .. ,'��;;*.'`-�eelin���'�Cr'��n'�at��th��A heairin �:''�e�. ,;t�st,:.also.;a ���ohti,";}�a�usk ;_-;�'�i 334d,. .;,.�;.:�tl,-� �;� .a '�=; ., �.. 9..j�. . .. ...... a.� t�'r�. r.'iy{.�«(�.:,N'"y��.�! •,,�_ , �.�f�a����+. t�'&;Y::''�.,�.t�:..Yp� '1' � ��:6'a:._i�f: i?.i:�_ °♦4U ! ._y: .i���.�t j�s�. i' • G � � ! } .. �'i . ..� ► { .. t. .� /� AN. �"(. a;•fi �;try`Ka• 6i.i',.ry �" I 1� .!-.� i�� � _ y j .t� � .z��o� a :hear�n�'ytiefora�•..th� ,����IBy.`y��'n'Comin�'ssion�0�1 �''�y�( .l•'-". 1� 4'�j•.1�1 �i• h 2 t Yi +'�� f2.�t :�� � 4t: �w .ti. �y .r: �p .� !�d�F .��rkv'��`�^` r+r.-t4: 'X:�`; .v e;;i,Zµ � ���Sy>'.r:l� ', .d.3�.� .�i' ' �'��� A`se �a �Y"'!'�+.�r. �"' +a ;{� � � � ` p,:.� .•�,-•. 'N�`' 4�'i�y 'i .,+'�]I�aC� 114%����:�. �'.�, �•�• "the��lia§i�,;o�: ���i�e�;Toi�'+d�� eictrlcabie; � �'� .�',;�;�: ,� � ��, �.v .: , „ y,�. �. � � x �p.� x� -�', • � 4? r- . ..° �,�-f:., ,T���?� . j` r•. 1Y �� � i aa 4.;• Y. ' #'' � �: r' �Y- 'i"w f� Y.. �a'.s. ,.} , ` .:-,, yy'' •�a���a: -'F�..�.f` .,f �. �.� 'it. .i��i"�' � Yw ��G, • T L�J x4�,}��• �' f'e.�:�'A•:� t' r� `•1�1 1i-. �'��•rsk'�� •� s: to��Innstit�i�Cit�l?�rk,��'and:,��fore..{�e; ���:�..n�.,_ � ,; � a, •r���' :�,� �-�� _ , �cologlcal tle ': " , ` ;C.: e ,� } 4..s �� 7',�.�l7";rT'��,tc:. i�., cf: `.;r�_ ;_�� �/;�' .�•" :�i„'•a.�,^�. ..,j�5.�:�, , :'?,r �-. i<'.y�?.� :l.I7T iF.' : '�`A.'i _ � .3':J'd'F �s �' n:�::••i'•`4N.:•��;e�ylc^�.. :!���,`.';•: ;:1�,{'Yy'.1. ��t�. .?y.���`'�.%n.�::i;�� t1o: t ?,dy;:'.; �dy ^��� .y� �:��Y� .,.���nvironrnen�al Qilrgii�y. and� �nerg�'::Co°r�miss�o�i' becaUse:a, �.� ; ..�. . -�•:�.;.: �::_,;�.� ; �,;;.: ,�: � .,;:... n = , zJ ' � �. �'("�• +.� '.� , � a : �::i: .r, .' :.G ' ��'� :j. .✓ tR Si '.A': ,. 'N''•1!- °Y,._ •1•�!C'.� a.� .:p,t.At. 6�`��+`�'�i �y:✓�},�+^�f:i� fL�}iti}S :� .r '`-YSr ui'.. 'a`�1 a �f�:t,•����� q�_� l� � , ::; .r 'cf�.the o�ivlo`ils �enviroi�iriecltai,.�or,��derati�t��,,. `a�;a .�,,:,L 7.1�'`S�y,},'��.''��`'-n�r• ,cs•a'`:' _ ��' _ ;:i�-:;;� " +�' :L .;i.L;.:�i; i�'.`•-i� ��iq•: .�. .a..qS� ✓ �iv� f '�-eL...? yt •`_� }�y 3y.�"���t-����' • �;•'� i�'$ ;� �(P�:•J�� j>ry'. :y: � . � . :'�� .f�, .` a �i ��, �.� r s � � _ ,� - : ���.- ��a �� S.. S ... .. t�'i �p.":' a';: r- ' ti• ��y ! . . y� � ,yz � °6 � ♦� •' � , : ., f•^�y. '.' . �r�. 1. . - it�j; �•�� , .r � a. ��, • S s. .+ ••.,c r.:a: y+:`r.�:u;'•�� t'. �� ..i�<��� t �,. s � . �i; a i, .'3 • . '. �.J: � �` � . _ _ � � �; " • � t�: . J':.. ' . . - . . . �fr . _ . . ,tl•'y '�� t ��4�w'/: . ' � . . � . � . . � . . ..��t.� � . ' , ' . . . ... �. ' .. . . � .. 1 � 1 :.;� .�,�> . f' ,,� �`-x,��'�,.,, :ae?,'-;� F';sy;';; � 2rte4; i�=. �,, � � w' 1' r��`\. � � �/ 1 n f ' I�RI1.)1.1:Y MUiVICIPAL CE�TER •t,�l:l l!\1�'I:RSI"fl' AVE. !�.F. FRIDLf�Y, MN 5i�3i? • cl,l?1 i71-3-7�(1 • F,�X i(,I �1 i71-I?H7 June 13, 1994� Terry Reyes � 1479.North Danube Road N.E. Fridley, MN .55432 � � John Halusl�a � .' S660 �irthur Street `N.. E•. � Fridley., MN �- 55432, Dear Mr.:� Reyes �nd Mr. Haluska: • � �I �recentl.y �: obtained.� a �co�:y:'o��.t�ie.� '!I�msbru�k��.Park!!•� not�.ce '. �� "� � � � �� distributec� by the. Fr'iends of Ir►nsbruck �Park���� ('undated)�.. �: I liave.' �� tried to call each of you�regarding some of the� statements in the notice. I want to clarify the.Community Development Department's activitie� regarding the proposed replat of the Totino-Grace High School property and the nature of pur discussions with the � developer. The ninth paragraph in the second column of your notice states that local citizens were made aware of these development plans at "the final hour". An employee of Totino-Grace, wishing to purchase a lot from the school, contacted my assistant over a year ago requesting information regarding how he could do that. An attorney for Totino-Grace subsequently contacted me and my Planning Assistant last Fall regarding potential subdivision of the property. We provided him with basic information on the platting process. He did not provide us with any detailed information on the number of lots or timing of the development. Apparently, Totino-Grace was beginning their decision making process. We receive hundreds�of calls through the year requesting information on a variety of issues. Without specific information, we had no basis to believe Totino-Grace was going to pursue an application for one or several lots. On April 7, 1994, I met with Mike Black from Royal Oaks Realty representing the petitioner. At this meeting, it was �lear that Totino-Grace was going to pursue an application. My policy has been to advise petitioners to contact adjacent property owners well in advance of any hearings or to conduct a neighborhood meeting. I advised Mr. Black to do just that on April 7,.1994. � � � Terry Reyes/John Haluska June 13 , 1994 Page 2 Development applications are typically submitted fou�r weeks in advance of the Planning Commission meeting at which it is to be considered. The petitioner submitted these plans on Friday, May 27�, 1994. According to, State and. loCal ardinance., . we wii�l .be mailing out th� public hearing notice for this request' on June 13, 1994 for the June 29, 1994 meeting. The nirith para�graph .goes �on �to state that negotiations '"are - now in their final stages and apparently contingent.only on.official acceptance by.the City of the developer's plan." During the � me�eting on April � 7, 1994, I provided� Mr. Black with �an �• application form:for�the plat and we reviewed the.basic �� information that is�required for an appl,ication. State law � requires, that a Qlat �e ��-eviewed by the �lannix�g Commissi� arid �the �City �ouncil:... �he :local subdivision ord�nance requi�res �that . the •Planning . Comm�ssi.on and the City .Counc.il � conduct' public� . hearings. City�staff has not conduc�ed.any meetings with the .. � ownership of Totino=Grace o'ther than to.provide.iri�o�mation � � regardi`ng �h� publzc � proGess, � necess�ry �a .'sulidi,v�de��: the_ .property. /� Finally, the notice states that "no formal plans have been submitted to the City's Planning Department, though there have been negotiations conducted by the Planning Department with � Totino-Grace management and attorneys." My staff, as we do with all subdivision and platting requests, merely provide citizens and developers with the procedures and the ordinance requirem�nts €or submitting applications. There have been no negotiations. Should you wish to review the proposed plat and obtain additional information from my office, please feel free to contact me or Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant. We will be happy to try to address any of the questions or concerns that you have regarding this development proposal. It was important to me, however, to address the statements made in your notice. Sincerely, Barbara Dacy, AICP Community Development Director BD/dn C-94-152 � cc: William Burns EngineEriian Sewer vJ;ti�r IParks �Sueeis �. 'Maintenance � � ME M4RANDUM � TO: � FROM: � DATE: . . �. . SUBJ�CT: . Barba�a Dacy, Community Developmerrt Director� PW94201 Michele McPherson, Planning Assistarrt � . John G. Flora,1Public Works Director• � Scott Erickson, Assistant Public Works Director � June 16, 1994 � � � ` Preliminaty Utility arid Grading Review of the Totino Grace� Plat P �� �. � .� 1, .. It is recommended to administer.the project simil�.to tlie street and utili#y consfruction #hat was � ' . : � ... �performed' by . Wa1=M�tt. �. The � developer wil( ptbvide all :platas,��soil :borings; .desigt� inspection� . � � �� � -��� � surveying and corrtr.act�or.� The developer will petition�the City to administe� tfie construction and .� � inspectfon �of the road. . � 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Prefer the developer loop the watermain from Arthur Street to the existing main located on the Totino Grace property. Install valves on the watermain at both ends. A 20-ft utility easement wiA be necessary for the watem�ain extension within the plat. Easemerits in outlot A should be 25 ft wide. Show the existing invert elevations of the sanitary sewer manholes in Arthur Street. Design the new sewer main with the maximum grade possible, currently it is shown at minimum grade. All utilities shall be instailed per City of Fridley specifications and will be inspected by the City. The lots located off of Matterhom Drive do not have water or sewer services stubbed to them. Contractor will install to City standards. Street patch to be completed by City. Use 20-ft radius 6618 curb retums on Arthur Street. 10. Water and sewer lateral fee assessments will be applied to each lot. An additional street and sto�rn sewer assessment will be included for the lots located off of Matterhom Drive. 11. Provide a street and utility plan showing plan and profiles. 12. Use NEENAH R-3250-A for catch basin grates and NEENAH R-1733-A lids and castings (27 in. diameter) for manhole covers. � �r i'1 /��' , . June 24, 1994 � Page 2 13. Install a grate on the end of the storm pipe outlet. 14. Soil borings witl be required in the stree� design. � 15. � Erosion coritroJ plans will �need to be subrt�itted for each lot or include them on the plan. . 16. Erosion control shall aiso be installed around the catch basins. � � 17. Tiae storm pond is cuRentiy located on private property. • ��� 18. . Adjust the alignment of.water and sewer rnain locations as noted on the attached drawing. 19. :A StoRn Pond Agreerx�ent will need to be executed. � . 20. . An easement should be added ar�ound. the pqnc�itig area � The.pond� should be located entirely on� �. � .� outiot A. . � • . . - .' . .. � . . � . 21. The City of Fridley. requires a. deterrtion basin'to tie installed to handle.the increased flow rates . � � � :c�used bythe�development, �Pleasesubmi# pre.and posfideyelopment�hydrolcxgy calculations,:tiirie� . � � .� .� `of concentration�cafculatioris, ponding� calctirations; anc! hydraulic calcul�#ions�for a dete'rition. pond ' with a restricted out(et. Provide a narrative on what you are proposing to do. � .� 22. An overflow outlet should be clearly shown on the plan. The outiet should be constructed to overflow and tie irrto the existing stoRn pipe located in Arthur Street. 23. The cul-de-sac should have a radius of 45.5 fee� Adjust curb and right-of-way lines accordingly. SE/JGF:cz Ke�th Eibensteiner Biltmore Construction P.S. #94-05 Robert Sroka 1243 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Alexander 7.2 81 Gardena Ave . � ' Fridley, NIN 55432 Roger Schutz _ � • 5991 Gardena'Ln. � � ' Fri�dley, MN 55432 Keith.Eibensteiner� Biltmore Construction� 4196�Lexington Ave. N. Shoreview, MN 55126 Patty Scott 1�47 Gardena Ave. Fridley, NIN 55432 Spencer Mine�r - 12�91 � Gardena `Ave . � Fridley, MN 55432 Leo Foco. � 1345 Gardena Ave.� Fridley,.MN 55432 Steven. Benson . � Pearl Ager . 5910 Oakwood Manor Nanette Neron Fridley�, �NIN � 55432:, �_ 569.7 ,W.. Bavarian� Pass . � � . � . . . . . � • , : � � Fridley; ` MN• 554.32. � .':: :. Joyce Sitko 5693 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Barbara Hovey 5685 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Anthony Wojciak 1515 Trapp Court Fridley, MN 55432 Judith Skillin 5662 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Rocheford 5695 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Lloyd Underhill 1511 Trapp Court Fridley, MN 55432 James McConnell 1513 Trapp Court Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Spencer 5656 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Totino-Grace , High Schooi 1350 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Ki Han 1251 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Lgle� ElYpberg . 5801 Arthur St. Fridley; MN 55432 Gerald Burrqw 5924 Oakwood Manor Fridley, MN .55432 0 � � Harriet Bellew � �: 5691 W. Bavarian Pass �� � Fridley,� NIlT �55?�32 � Samy Ahmed n, 5683 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, NII�T 55432 Karyl Belknap 1517 Trapp Court Fridley, MN 55432 Barbara Pickering 5664 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Lowell Russell 5680 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Raymond Krech Mary Wright Donald Tonn 5686 W. Bavarian Pass 5684 W. Bavarian Pass 5682 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 %� I,oui�s .Hudoba 5G60 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Bailey Tiller 1535 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 David Shafran 1499 Garde�a Ave. Fridl�y, MN 55432 Mary Christenson 1337 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN.55432 Charles Croon �• 1437 Gardena Ave. Fridley; MN 55432 Y� Foco �5 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 James Soderberg 5875 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 John Evers 5801 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Arthur Moore 5833 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Dale Kreitz. 1612 Berne Circle �\dley, MN 55421 Arthur Hartley 5666 W. Bavarian Pass Fridley, MN 55432 Stephen Shorma 5916 Oakwood 1�Ianor Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Palme'r 13 2�9 Gardena �Ave : � Fridley, NIN 55432 Richard French 1469 Gardena Ave. Fridley�, MN 55432 Davicl Omli�e • • 1423. G�rdena Ave. Eridley, NIN 55432 � Bruce Beierman 5895 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Duane McGonigle 5865 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Kenneth Florian 5849 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Ronald Noren 5825 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 5809 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 'Jerome Tiller P.O. Box 222 Dassel, MN 55325 Steven Benson 5910 Oakwood Manor Fridley, MN 55432 Spencer Minear . 1291 Gardena Ave. Frid�ley, MN 55432 Dorothy Baxter 1465 Gardena'Ave. Fridley, � NIl�T 55432 Dean Johnson � � T4-13 Gardena Ave. Fridleg, MN � 5543-2 Michael ieliltfang 5885 Tennison Dr. Fridley, NIld 55432 David Fuhrmann 5855 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Eleanor Caputa 5841 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Gary Erickson 5817 Tennison Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Lawrence Hille 5712 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Dona�ld Brunner 5700 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, NIN 55432 Gerald Scovil . � 5760 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Roger Engstrom � . 572��Ma�terhorn Dr. Fridley, NIN 55432 Terryl Anderson 5860�Matterhorri Dr. �Fridley, MN 55432. Vaughn Vesall 5790 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Young Han 574� Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Ros.e.len Halvorson 1250 G��dena Ave.� Fridley; MN 55432 William.Graffunder 5840 Matterhorn Dr. Fridlep, MN 5543�2 James McSharie• � � • � Che'ryl � Nybo 5800.Ma�terhorn Dr.. 1612 Berne Circle � Fridley, MN ,5�432.. . � " , .-Fridley., MN � �554�21. Minda Castillejo� 5776 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Michael Ryan 5736 Matterhorn Dr. Fridle�, MN 55432 � Bradley �eving 5880 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, N!N 55432 Robert Schei 5812�Matterhorn Dr.. Fridley., MN 5543.2. Ja�nes� JohMSOn. � �� 5657 N.: Danube Road . Frid�ey,,MN 55432 9 ^ Timothy Redfield 5643 N. Danube Road Fridley, MN 55432 Michael McDonough 1439 N. Innsbruck Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Swanson 1480 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Donald Peters 1438 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 James Bernard 1424 N. Danube Road Fridley, MN 55432 Rasheed Kahn 1455 N. Innsbruck Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Lowell Mellum 1464 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Dwaine Overby 1248 Hathaway Ln. Fridley, MN 55432 Paul Nelson /� 1425 N. Innsbruck Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Teresa Koller 1498 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Charles MacFarlane 1452 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, NIN 55432 Stuart Thompson 1264 Hathaway Ln. Fridley, MN 55432 William Drigans James Iacono Doyle Mullin 1280 Hathaway Ln. 1217 Hathaway Ln. 1233 Hathaway Ln. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, NIN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 � Roger Sonstegard 1249 Hathaway Ln. Fridley, MN� 55432 ,� Lavid Harris 5695 Matterhor.n Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel Larson � .565D� W. �•Danube. Rd-. � Fridley, MN 55432 James Wolfe 1265 Hathaway Ln. Fridley, MN 55432 Benja�in Ewers 5680 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Kenneth Bureau �• 563O:�W. Danube �Rc�: • � Fridley, MiJ 55432 Orville Sachs 1281 Hathaway Ln. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Neessen� 5666 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 David Roberts 1401 N, Innsbruck Dr. Fridley, NIIJ �55432 Elmo Ness . Leslie-Gerdin Leigh Angle 5647 Ma�terhorn Dr. 5663 Ma�terhorn Dr. . 5679 Matterh�orn DY. �� F•ridley, MN 55432 � Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 JosepYi Andert � � Bradiey Dunham �. •� � • . � Rpbert �etzold -� � . � . 1445 N. Danube Rd: 1427 N. Danube Rd. 1421 N. Danube Rd: Fridley, MN 554�32 , . . . . .Fridley, NIId � 55432 : . Fridley; NIIJ � 5�432 � �.. "..• . .. . : : • �� .,: . • . . : . .. . . • •. �. .� : . �.' � . t �I Ifw�t Bergene . 5 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Kenneth Ness 5688 Arthur St. Fridley, MN 55432 Terry Reyes 1479 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Jacob Wiens 5809 Arthur St. Fridley, MN 55432 Hein Tran 5670 W. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Milton Bullock 5674 Arthur St. Fridley, N!N 55432 Duane Narog 1465 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Gordon Backlund 5805 Arthur St. Fridley, MN 55432 Bradley Carlson 5660 W. Danube Rd. Fridley, NII�T 55432 John.Haluska 5660 Arthur St. Fridley, NIl�T 55432 John O'Brien 1453 N. Danube Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel Echols 5855 Arthur St. Fridley, MN 55432 Anthony Kahlhamer Michael Berchin Donald Moore 5837 Arthur St. 5829 Arthur St. 5821 Arthur St. �dley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, NIN 55432 Payn�ond Renner 1564 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Dean Anderson 5871 Arthur St. Fridley, MN 55432 Donald.Lewis 6001 Garclena� L�n. Fridley, NIN 55432 Gregory Lytwyn .� 6010 G�ardena Ln. .Fridley, MN, 55432 �City Council Members William Simms 1494 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Charles Erickson 1508 Gardena�Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Prokash Purohit � 5885 Arthur St. Fridley, MN 55432 John Tiller 1538 Gardena Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Lonita Kiiber, . . � .Wendy :Backer. . : . �� 5951 Gardena Ln. 1495.Gardena Ave.� Fridley, MN 55432 � Fridley, MN 55432 �J�ffrey Hagen . .Planning. Comm.. Chair 5980 Gardena Ln. � . Fridley, MN 55432 �.. . g �7 � i�� PUBLIC HEARING � BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be.a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, June 29, 1994 at 7:30 p.m.� for the: purpose of; . . . � Consideration of a Preliminary P1at request, P.S: #9�4-05, by Keith Eibensteiner for •�� � ' Biltmore Construction of. New Brighton, Inc., ._ . to�subdivide-part of Lot.l, B1ock.'1; Grace � High S�chool Addition into nine new s•ingle . family lots,�generally located in the � � . southeast�corner of the Totino-Grace High .School .p�operty �a,t .1350 Gardena Avenue N.�E. �.. � � Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than June 22, 1994. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above.stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 571-3450. Publish: June 14, 1994 June 21, 1994 /""\ DAVID NEWMAN CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION �- �� � e �;;; �. �( � .3 y ��;�� ���. Totino-Grace High School � 1350 Gardena Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432-5899 June 8, 1994 Barbara �Dacy, A�ICP Community Development Director 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 RE: Totino-Grace Addition Dear Ms. Dacy: 0 The Archdiocese of �� Paul and Mi�neapoiis is the fee .owner of the Totino- si2 sii-si�s •. � Grace Hi h School and its cam �us. VVe have entered into.�a purchase�agree- Fax 612.571-9118 . g . P ment with Mr. Keith Eibensteiner, Biltmore Construction, Inc. for the sale of approximately 4.2 acres. We are also aware of their application for prelimi- nary plat approval showing nine single family lots. Yours Truly, �i�, �� �Brother Milton Barker President BMB jch � � � � ^ � /'`, �`'� CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 . '� � (612) 571=3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAT APPLICATION FQRM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site p.lan required for submitta.l; see attached Adtiress: � � � � ' � Property Identification Number (PIN) 24-30-24-130003 - Legal description: Lot 1, Block 1, Grace High School Addition • L'ot. Block • ' 'I"racdAdditio� � � � � Current zoning: • R-1 • Square footag�acreage' � � Reason forpla� subdivision of nine new single famil.y lots . Have•you operA.xed a business in a ci�.y which required a business license? � Yes No X If yes, which city� � ��� ' ^ If yes, whax rype of business? NA Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME Keith Eibensteiner-Biltmore Construction of New Brighton, Inc. ADDRESS 4196 Lexington Avenue North Shoreview, MN 55126 DAYTIl�IE PHONE 483-5518 SIGNATURE DATE a, � 7 �� PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE DATE Fee: �500.00 for 20 ots �_ $ 15.00 for each additional lot � � Permit P.S. # �' 'pt # � c� a 3 _ Application received by: �'/ ,o Scheduled Planning Commissio date. L Scheduled City Council date: , ` r'� iminar� at o , , ______J . L_�__.__���'_"�__'___.'___ . . . . , .. . � � . . . . . � ' _ ` I . . ____."_ "'�__r' ' __ " � ' _ '___ j� { . . . . . . . . . . � � � � ��� I 1 _ � � � � � � � � � � I. � _____'--�_'_______' _ . 1 h 1 . � . . . , . � ������_����������_�_�J --� ; r------- � I � I ^ � I i Y % I � / i '� i i i � � i I � i � � � i I � �� ' � � � ooi � ; �� 1 , 1 � I ' � ' ------; , � I I L 1 ! I � � s , _ s ss � '' I lA; ♦ �� I ��� I ,r� � �O•I ./ _/ � ZN � `i� � R = 54G ''; i " � ,% - � ` - � . T = >35. ---�---' ' i --' ' � L = 265 ��� � � � 66 1 �� � � :.� � � 1 � � ^ �' � ' i i � � � r -1 \ n � - -_—�= Y� I �\ � \ � �� � 1 � / �� i \ � � .� � �.�� \ ' ' � � �� � � . � .. '�'. ..` � \ / \ ��--'1 / \ �� � � � � � \ �` \ � ♦ � _� r s� � ` ` n � � " % \� � � y;, . � � �� �`q � I� � `�' �\ � ��S ,' \ ' � --'` C � � � — \ f � � � � - ��-._ � ` � � �G � � v '2. � s � \: ^ �. eai \ � . 5 \ � � � . '� \\ Y � � ,1 . o = as•os's�" ,, �•� ' n _ �ss�o= — — -',\ `� os� — — — — T = za. za' �� � L = 48.56' ---�� �� ° n � i �-t \� rf� DRF,!A'AGE AND U?ILITY EASEMEN7S — �\� •'� ''� AR= SHC14'N AS THUS: � �� � � STREET r �'. % `�\\ � �� --- � --� �----- � � 1QOOJ � � 10.00 �� � � � \ I I . t 5.00 ---� ' � � 10.00 � � y('' 10.00 ---�-- J L--F--- REAR LINE � BFING 5 FEET IN 1NIDTH ADJOi�ING SIDE LOT LINES, AND 70 FEE7 IN W1DTH ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LCT LINES, UN�ESS OTHERWISE SHOWN WDfCATED AS SHOWN ON THE ?LAT � � � � , \ l \ \\ ,` � \ r �� \ ��', ; ' i� i� OGvRR: � .. i � � o��a � . ; � � ��.,. , . � , � I �� i I � � � � � � � � i � a��:.w^ I \ I \ I \ �t.tR. Tren �` /�1 h ( 1 ! !- - ; \` ��� � I-\ • L/ l� ♦�� �a�� _,M, � � , �. ,� GRAPH►C SCALE � � iN rc� ) . � � i m�n - �o a � ,.Job No. 94194PP i � I I � I N B7'S4'49" TY 1303.73' a�`�3 i �116.2.07 e^"° � � N 88120 49 ' 1 i\; I\ Y . � F�' ` 1` I I 11 � � i .il� � � � I, � , i � /^\ ,1/ �. 1\II I�- ,-, . �_ � . ., �- � tiv � I ;\I 1 �i F ; ; ._ r � i i � � � i ., � .i I i I ri � � 1 i � .. I I �R` I : i � 'w�axBw�eu.r � w� ,i G'.�,' . ws�,s v..r:, , ean.. 0 Denotes set iron pipe O Denotes found iron monument , � .,; . , .,._..,..�. .. � I• I � � �: � � a,. a ��,. , i �� ' � _ i 1 � � ; � 1 i � � r i ' � Notes: i) 2 foot contour interval. 2) 1YeUands delincated by Arlig Engir.eering. 3) Topographic mapping is only sho�•n for proposed single family lots. 4J Aveinye /of oiFO = /< /oD Sr. !� _�i<ti i+ i hereby cerli;thot lhis survey, pfon, or reporF was D�ored by me or under my d�rect supervi:n and thot � am a duly Reg�slered Lo Surveyor under the laws of l�h��e�5late Min eso a r Dote J-IP- 94�egislrotiun No 96r� . , ` � � 1 �S � � � .�� � I � I 1 ! � ' ' , i� � � I � r 1 � �. i I I I l��`��� r------- 60 � i � � � �i � � S� i �, L 1 J w Mo M: �O � O ti� � '� '.' _- i - �.� �_� .� L : J 1 /�' 1 �+ l � _' � I ; � . �; i � i� � � �, . �.�' �.' � t i i i � � ,� , � , � I ��� i � , . � ,-. 1"_ _1_�� _ _.. _ I � -;• � < — � � � � -- i i •-- � .-, i _. ; ,, i • , � OuI�HR: I ' _ ' y,n�e k Dea.aa � YoOr� I�- I i i L-, � i -� I �y\ � �.� `'--_---- � � i --' I � ,\ 1 �i./ � 1 1 � � \ I �• / i _ i „ � I �i i � . _ �: ; � . - . ,�.,. 1 ��� I � � j _' I '-- I r - \ � �_� 1 _ _ I L�_� 1 � — I ��' � � � � � � OLL�ER: , ���, . �aa � 6«�w�a L—_._ I I � 1 � R: i�o��im�..o�,�. i �----- -- I � � i' / E_ C�. RUD � �ONS, INC_ LAND SURVEYORS �IBm LEXINGTON AY—�. NO, ciecL� Pi�;�s, �i���soTa 55m14-3625 TEL. �So-55�✓-6 � u • ______� �_ __ Preliminar� C�€rading Plan oF -------------------------------- --- � --- ----------- � O T i N� C� R�, C��� D I 1' I ON ---------------------- ; , ; .. . .. � _ ------------------� --, , ,,, „ ;�_ ,.; ,�, � . � � �i � . ' i r' . � � � r- . I �. I � � • /^1 ,1 / LF . ; \ 1 1 1 M - � � r-- ----------------- _..,_ � ,-, . _ .. _ , � ---- , ,� � I �'r------------ ------ � � ---- � ---------------- �� i Dev��op er ; 25; --------n -�---------, 60 s�� i Ro a I Oaks Rea ity, Inc. ;; , ��,.� , KE � ��� i L � � Sf I I ' 1 1 I � � I i � � I Lot 1, Blo ' � Total Are ' I , i I ------; � , � I � �.� � �s_ � � --- � •_ ' �;' i _ � _ � % ' L-� I �- 1 _ � � ��� �1 ' . �_J � L 1 J ' � 66 ` � � f 1 n � ,1�I _ _ — �-� ` 'T � \ `� �1 �' � . ., t" � �� � � � , �� .� � � � � � , � � � � \ i -1 \ \ / \ � �� �1 / \ \ � � � � \ \ � \ \ \ \ �, \`` \ ````� /' \ s\ �� _---__�,`� _ �-�`� _— . - — � -- � � �� , ti;� � � � � ,' 1� � � `''� `\_� � ` _____-----��\`i� ` �; -- � 1 � � � � Noles: � ' 1) 2 foot contour intervat. � �� �� 66 2) �WeUands delineated by AHig Engineering.`� 3) ?opographic mapping is only shown for � proposed single [ami:y lols � �� � . � � ; ; � ?YPIGAL LOT �� , `� I� / GY ;.°.,... ».r . ``\ ;i�/h Eibenst�iner i" i' , � '�� � ` i � " i ��CJ �EXIYIGjt.Oi� Ave. N. �; �� NOTE: ADDITIONAI �TOPOGRAPHY NOT SHOWN r � \ � , `1 � ` oreview -1`'in. 5512� � � NORTH HALF OF ORAWNC NOT.TO SCAIE n � \ V� ` Tel, 483-b518 � � I\� ," / NOTE: AODITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY NOT SFiOKN � � � � � � � NORTH HALF OF ORRVANG NOT TO SCALE � � � � � \ Deseription of Property ; ; � � ' �� � ` � _ � �k 1, Grace High School Addijtio� i- �� r�, �� ��� ,, � �� j � = 1,485,244 sq.ft. 34.1 a�r�s , � ' � � � � �, � ,, � `^ • � ' � i r J �, ( i ; � � ` � � �� � 1 � � � I ' 1r � � y� � � � ----------- �'� � � ' �� � �- ------_----- �, � ; � �`' � ; ' - , --- o / ' � ' 4 1 / ! A � .�'� � ; � � — _ \ _ ` �. 1 � 1 ,� \\�. �A � � 'ti `\�� / ;, / �/ \��/�� `�1`\\�\\`I L � / �. � 1 � � O� \'�1!!/.r \��'��O\\` / �� ' li i ; ; , � , °� •�� , "� � �,� � ____ , ,. , � �, . , - r � � ?5. i �N O� � �, � � � 11� wo� y ` ���\ �., •� �\ � i� r �. '' i '� � Y �": I =n � �•`\ �\,�ai ��.'Vrn ��ii � � � f .��' �,: . 1 j � � . \\�..` \ % � � 1'.� � /� I . � � � I '. I ' , '. t, � 2 1 I �/ �� i � �n o ��. ��i� � i' / �� ��� ` j— r �� P;Q gS�� l� �� � � No � � o � \�, - l�(���� —__— C'� , �, � � ���.`'`l, �r�f3�` ' \' `� � � � � �� ` i i u � �:�'' � \ � � i `���: \: � � _��� � i�!. � s�' q � `��, � ;,; ', ' ; ; ; � � i` i r `�;��� � --- : �� � ,���; �f,� � ,h �" � ;�,rk�' ��, ;. ,. - � � � �;D ,'� ' _. �'_ � I ` � ``� ` � '� / -' _: l �1 . r .; � f y,s' �,�� ° . \ I .. . � . � � / o . . . i i; � . ���� � � � � � �'� � � �-+ �� I - ��pA� �, I � � V W p I.1 Ir: � .t��.� ��. �� � � �� L $l � �\ Np PW P+�IIO. .� ' II �\ l�9go� . ..;`. . � � I` i� I .�,�\ `��-� , �jl �\ � o `� � � ��o.... ssa. . . r � � � , / � . .y ` �'. �� \ 4 \` \I��S . \ � � S.T lolbn YwG' . 7 I. . � � .\\ � � iO�1'% T °e . — _ _ � � � �� I / � � 95Q� \ .: ,\ � � �. ``\ I \� �� .� �;� �.: .` .R � � `. . � . �4�'CAq�. ; ��` .. . g(tA� ` `.07 Ae. n. Voa va. �.. i � ' � R�. ,� ✓' , ��� � ;�. 4a_ , � � � ,\Y •, l� t -- `-'= � � � `� � ,. / I , � � � . � � '�, , � � ��� ��yM �-ssQ! �i �y��_ �, i. - i `� ------------- _ .\ \ \��'\ � [�-�- '1' .L��.�� �'� ,_ � �� � 'i. I�.. - � �(�, ROYAL h°;°`.� :�o . �,ti ` ____' !_.� i % �,��.,,�\�� I _ ) � � --� ' I1�r' �_, ` . =_Y'/�� c�wwvRmJcnw�� ��' �, _ � _ � j �� . � �\ `� � M- � i � .�1` I �\ � 1 �' i� � -r �, ..= y � , -./ � \ �, I _ .- � y' . ! \ \ \` 1\ �\\ 1 . \t� / ��� ` � I\.i� i . i -- �---i �" .�- ' �S,S [\s /\�'. \ Ce' _� `�+. _ GT . •�� r ;'� , - _,' ��� � � __ --' � ��_'' t�YV � 1 ��_ .-'r , . � J . ` �`�� --- --- = -.:< "'° ; I_'" % / --1 0.� �. � ;� ,���:�fit '� --�`_�'_� -----� �� - --� 9 ---- - — -a.� � �\ f i ,------- --- ---_ �! _'\ I �' �_ � . /���wu�s�""` ' � I I - -�' \ ; 1 � . -' so -- _ — — _ _ � � I / ° I t� _..... I' j 3,�Jm � � (� � l i `` i � ' � e � � �• �I � �' / / _ � L; I I � o^/ - I' �� s , sep� / i ,�� , �i i / . � � ' i '� � � � // `�/ � � � � ��,."'„� '� �- O � " ' � � " ��ti � Ii? � ', i / / �,, .r' � � � � / � �I I� il - �� J I.� I \�� . �� �i S �i � i i � I ; �'' Y iN' � / I �\ � / / �i .1 �J� � � / II��J �� i'l. � �—._a � � � � � � ; � � � `/ / � � ti � � I � 2 � ��1�; �.� � .-. � �1—� —�— ----�--�'i------- ' � � � � I I \� �/ / . . fll I I i ' �, � ` , �`, , � �� �` `1� GRAPH!C SCALE ui � w ,�� � 1 Inch � 30 �� ----'-"=-=--J L_ �� � � ... . � ---+---=- . _-' L-------� �-----J L_ I I , EAQSION CO!.TAQL NOTES v oi°'ii p Y Cp(STRUCIIJI O� A S➢.T (DCC •,� i, " :/�` � -'�„_- I ,l i+ '� � �; I � III �I . ti,l�, ��I � � i l 1�J I1� i -�- r\ \�II �. I� , . .: � L�-i '�1_ � t�` , � �' 5Q � �------ r------- � � �- i i � ; ; � i � I 1 � � - �------ , -- � •-- � I I _ 1 1 " I - 1 _ � --- i i �-' t � i " _ � ,_ � _� ' „. ' -�; -- I i • ; 1 I \� 1{ i . � ��' i _- i _ --- `-; S __ ` — — — � -- � ` �'_ �o« n�-+u.a s¢ a;�:, I hcreby t?'::!y lhe; Ih�S s�rvc:, ^.'c^�. : reporl wcs ;re?cicC by me c_. Cer m,y Cirecl superv:sion ond t'nat I�� � Cc'.y FegiSlereC !enC Svrveyc�r ur�Ce�l^�e !c-e�s ol Ihe Stole e; �'Inr.esota �.r.r j. :l�.A� . Dute rT:' `; Reg�sL•atien !to '.^' =^, E_ C�. RUD � SONv, ING. LANJ SURVEI'ORS 918� LEXI�C�TON A1/�'. \O. CIRGLE PIt�ES, MI�IN�SCTA 55D1�-3625 TEL. �86-b��6 Job No. °�?9�PP � � � �oo O � o � � � � 2 � � I O � , � 2 � � � � 0 ` � �yl vi Y � vj 1 N J � ci � • • • __--- ----- -------, --- ,__--- � -----�_ �__—�—___— �� --- ���� �-� ' r� r� i i r- . . � �i o1 � � �l L- � � i' / \ � i i � i � - �i � /' / � _ _ _ — . / � / X I � � ,� ._ _' — — _ _ � _ _ -� ' — _ _ _ , i�//�/\ l i.� . . 1 � � . // /�\//c\1� ��' � / i � � ���„ � � �. . /� `\ '/ J 1 �-' elsa�.3` -ri � '��e��s � � � / ,/(�� � / i . 35�� � ,�' � ' � ' / �'�� � �`� � , � �� i , � � ��/'� / `� ��. - � � � y� � � �. � � � / i �s � � � i ../ , ' � l; � � �:' �' � i � i �` , , o� , �`� � � � � '� o� � � �,� ' i / �\ • 'Y`1,, ,- �.:'' � �+ i� ��` A,' i� � 1 i c.^°" i l. i. � � l � � i� o" . `o/ I . . � � � � � � � I I y.; . a N y/ . . ' ���„P°,',+ .\ 1 � g .. ` � � o v,,,. . � ' . / / . . � i.w � . � � / . . ���). 1 � � � m .1 �s�� ' � t + I . I I 25 � �,--�' � � � .. . . . � � �' � ! �� � � � . --� + 0 1 , , , i ,,, q , , , .>. g ✓ l�. �1 �� 1 � > � � I � I / I _ . � ` ' � },i i , 1 1 � . z i �� � i � � \ ,�� /I '---'�� ///�i '� �\\ \ . . '-_----'------__ � � � � . � '-__"' � / \ 9 � . . ��� i \ J` ��� \ V ' ' . I�� . \\\ .. \\ . . . ""__"` \\ � � �\ \ \\ \ � ♦ _ i �i. '-- .�. -�� � , ., - ------� ,-,----- ��. � T 1 . '� / �si :_ �__ : _; -z- --------r-�_-__ . , --------�_�---- - T , . '� / _ _ I i � � � _ 1 ' .i � �_i � _____�_____;___ �T' � . � � ... \ J TI M I b t \ b n ; �' $ ;� p c � � 2 �ti N' j � .�i Q^ d ��� Q N' ? � T � O j � � � b l \ J N e go$m H� � O 4 m � ,o o � �N'� ; � n �y'o N � G O p J G I � l ''"- - / ' - / i i � i � %i � _� i - 'i '__� � \ � _ ` �\ ��\ � � \ . � ` \ \ \ � � \\ \ 1��\ `�� � 1 t � �� U 1 I � � 0 1 I � �� � I ' ` I l O I I I \`� � �- �� � � I �O �' \� //, � � . � I N � ; , �' � � ' � /I j � f 1 . � � � . -� * 1 � I ���-�� I � 1� � . O , --.�\ �,-'� � � �\ i , � � � � � .\ � '- � ' � � � � �"\\ --' � i ,' � � i � i � . 1 \ 1 I . � � .. � � �\ ��_� � . . ` , , � �� , - , � � I �A , �950� \�� \�� � Ij � /�������� v �i s— -� � � , - ti� -�, . _� �\\�\\ /// /i� �/ 1/%l /� �� i���� \ �` ��I / / // // \ ` ' 952 _ i �� . i . � �% /�/ . /� i ii�/ 1u� \� � I � �s9 ---- ,�/ �/ %- - - � //; ; %// �,((� /;' I � ; /� �. ,, ;,,,,; ,- , � y , „�, �� i� �� i. � � -` � -., „ �� �i � � /i�i � i . �� y`s i � /� ���: � , ___--s`$_,` _-..... � il . � . � j� � _ � �/f 6� � i � \ �\ 9sy �` � i ii� �% j . �o!l�^�\ y,ts ��� j � i � ` , o� ,i�tK�� � ,� , � , , � <._ = � r \ �` ��� i i �r i � i /, ;',',• p4a — � ��°. � i �, � -=a�s',9t , j � � � ii i ii � � , i �� , ��i� . � . \\ \\ 1� � ��'{�I�� � � � �� /. �� ��� / i\-'Y���`.� � � � � 1I 11��4 I i l � /�i������/' —_ — - 940 � . . ��i���`� � � � , ��.�-� _ _ / � � \� 1 1111 \ 1 � �932''.'�' �:�'.''_- -- � �� �� I \ \ 11��11`\\ � __i �% � ���� = ___ `` _ \ \ �\ \� 11 l � � �%y i �/ _ \ . W �� �� � 1`1��,1 ��� �� � i ��/ ��_� � 9S0`_ i ��..y■ \ \ � \\�� 4 � �i /�/� � \\ �' \ V • � \ \\ `-�� � i��i�/ ll \1 ._ � `\+ ����\�\• ��_ '� /�%'/ ��� I �\ � \ 1 �~ 3 � ' �� � `� \\ f � � \ � '- .�`�' "`, � 1 � �� � �y \ i ^-� I � . : �G9� ` 1 i � . l � 1 \ ` T'� � � _- - � I \\ \ / � � � ' �, � / �� �,_� �JF j ._, \�� \ � �i / � / , \ � / / � 1 . � /. � / . A '/'� ' � �� `1 � � I/ � I. I � g //����� �. � I � ' ��%r� � � ,� � -' - - � � ' �`� � � .-- , � ' �y � /\� �`` ' � � C /�•i � 950 � .� � \ � I � � � tt i .. � o / / Qi � � t � \> ° a�- �°i i - � I 1 \ �` / � � / '0 1 I I \ �\ . ��p r� � � / I � I I � / - �. S � � � f . I / / � �7A L ��1 I f � 1/ I in� � � � 1 I / ' i i� \ � 1 � / � � � � �� � ��II 1 � � �� � i � � � � i i N ! ii i r � � i / mo ��, /�i i ;,�! `- '; ' , ,, , �p / , � � � 2 ��, I/� e -A� � � / �� O O I� � ' m['�= '' 1 " ; � °�Q � /,r� i i i �� � '�u'°."�%� i. � � iz ���1� n� � i � i $g�c, i � � _ 1� �� la; �\ � / / . / � 1 . ' � �� � " � �. � A1 � / l � � � \ � / / / � . � � � � � � 25 _ � \ 1 �� i � h I � .� 1 O� �. / � - - I I /r� ��$�0 � ! / i d , �2i = / � =�� i�i �� � i i ;� � r� o = �d. � , � / � , _ �' J �--- � � �' _ _ ^ i � i ;/ i i 1\ .Q / . !\�`..� � � ` .. ' i / i _' q�b. '__' � � _ � rk �:.::1 l.l��. ir •;'i\�/ _— ±—_ —�_ _ n �\ I- I I 1 - —r_•- �-�—'�-. � � � � 0-�-�s-�.G,- "i� . "� m m m b �N o� "��"' z � �� --f � � � � � �sfl,� �' C0� X � �< �'E�c��-a �, � �. 0 v��o�� CA Ur„� � � -� V' �� � �� N � �� z � � � � � � i � � ,i� > � -T'1 � r , l � \ 1 � , � T , � I I • � `-' � � ,�, � v � � \/ � l4 � � A► � � � � �,` � � f T 1 i i � � `-- � f T 1 � ' I f�� f .� - ----_ -- �,-_--_==-=�z�====___ � •_�' �_ jF- T `[_� �� i � i r - � ----�-- - - - -- --- � �� �_ �_ �� —ERIS7:e�SAJ�9V.' ----__--_____= o � �+ __=_ ' �_ .=.,i=--==���_ =�IST''6`� ---�-- �_ .i . . . .. .. �\ ---------------------"��-------� ----------------------- ----------------- -------- \\ � . i � I = I 1 I 65 � . � .---, S TAFF REP C) RT Community Development Department APPLICATIO.N NIIMBER: .L. S . #94-0.1 YL''i1111U1VLiR: Charles Westling Appcals Co«imission Datc Planning Co�nitiission Date = City Council Datc � June 29, 1994 LOCATION•. . . � . �5400�- 4th Street; northwest corner of tfie.intersection of 54th Avenue and 4th Street: � � � � ' � . REOIIi;S.T • � . � . . . . . . . . � Split one parcel into two residential lots. � ANALYSIS� Project/Parcel Description The subject parcel is composed of 10 platted lots, minus the portion taken for highway purposes for the I-694 entrance ramp. The lots are combined into one PIN number. Located on the parcel is a single family dwelling and a detached garage. An old foundation is also located on the property north of the existing structures. There are a number of large mature trees located on the property. The property is zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling. The petitioner is proposing to split the lot on one of the existing platted lot lines. Typically, this would be handled administratively as a division. However, due to the unique shape of the lot, variances will be required as the petitioner proposes to construct a four-plex on the vacant portion of the lot. The City Attorney advised staff that as variances are required, the lot split and variance process should be pursued by the petitioner. District Requirements � The R-3, General Multiple Family District allows one, two, and multiple family dwellings as principle uses. For one family � dwellings, the R-1 District requirements must be met. The lot � �"� Staff Report L.S. #94-01, Charles Westling Page 2 split will create a separate parcel and 1�10 feet wide for the existing meets the minimum requirements for requir.ements are also inet. : 15,437 square feet in area single family dwelling. This � the R-1 District.�� The setback �. The vacant parcel has.a lot area of 18,047 square feet and a lot width of 303.76 square feet. Both meet the minimum requirements for the R-3 District. The parcel is shaped T�ike�a 30-6U-90�right triangle, which leaves a small buildable area after the setbacks are�applied. The lot is�double-fronted because of the I-694 .. right-of-raay, therefore a 35 foot setback is�required for both the front and rear yards. The petitioner has submitted site plans for both a single family and multiple family dwellinc�. The single fami�ly. dw�lling can be�constructed on the parcel: without• variances. The peti�ioner, however, wants. tti cor�struct a�four- plex, which will require a variance for the garages as well as a port�on of the dwelling. Approval of.the lot split should be contingent on:.approv.al o€ the variance req�est. � . **Stipulation** Variance Reque�t,�VAR�#94-10 shall.be �. approved. � Access and IItilities The parcel has access onto 4th Street. A curb cut is located the southern portion of the vacant parcel. It does not appear that the petitioner will be able to utilize this curb cut for proposed garages. The petitioner will be required to replace curb cut when a new one is constructed. **Stipulation** The petitioner shall replace the euistinq curb cut when a new curb cut is installed. on the the Sewer and water services have been stubbed to the property line for the vacant parcel. The petitioner will be required to pay Sewer Availability Charges (SAC) at the time of the building permit. The petitioner should verify with Metropolitan Waste Control the exact amount of the fee. **Stipulation** Grading and Drainage SAC fees shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. The petitioner did not submit a grading and drainage plan as part of the lot split application. The petitioner will be required to ^ submit such a plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. The grading plan should show the existing and proposed topography, the location of the existing trees, indicating which r�-� Staff Report L.S.. #94-01, Charles Westling Page 3 ones will be preserved, and spot elevations for the drainage. An erosion control plan may be required. A decision regarding the erosion control�wi�ll.be�made based on the grading plan submitted. **stipulation*+� •'� The� •petitioner shall submit a�qradinq and' � drainaqe plan prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit. . Parlc Fees The subdivision ordinance requires the payment of park dedication fees. �he fee will•be $'750.00, to be paid at the time of the building permit.• . � . **Stipulation**�� � A�.park fee of.$750.00 shall be paid at the . .� issuance of a buildinq permit. _ � . Light Rail Tiamsit . _ � . " � ._ � � Th�e subject par�el. has been iricluded in the preiiminary Ligiit Rail Transit plans as a potential parl� and ride site. The ^ petitioner has been made aware that Anoka County is looking at the subject parcel for that purpose. Anoka County continues tQ be responsible for LRT planning activities: AECOMMENDATION/STIPIILATIONS: ' Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request with.the following stipulations: 1. Variance Request, VAR #94-10 shall be approved. 2. The petitioner shall replace the existing curb cut when a new curb cut is installed. 3. SAC fees shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The petitioner shall submit a grading and drainage plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. A park fee of $750.00 shall be paid at the issuance of a building permit. � . � �- , _ • '1,, s ' . : ' ��.1 J� ,< _ �:��� w L.S. ��9�o--01 Charles Westling I '�. i � ; � ,. Q, i _z_� r b l�__--f ,- -- .- -�-- --� � ----�--- -� �---- - --1 i-� -- �- J , �_i-,��� :� _ � � 4► � i�l F----- —� --� --- — '� --�_� �:�—:_� �_--� � 1.:" 6' �i'_ j z? �� B Iv�_ I � s _��--_ — � r '1j,`'— �� _-9 �y .� 2z T '!� i y I � r,` �� _i �1' - *s.�..t-- —=-=,= __ -----� r- --- ,.: . �, ,. .. �,. � . � � ' _ _—L-i � -_ _ � � � �-� _ _,� ,rl. .. �..: _ --�-- t-�-� �--__� , _ � �_ , , �i , : : !� — ,. �r� It. . —�I �Y�).��� t. �1—j �'r— �so � , . ---� � � _ '__1. `�r_. � �_— �'' ` � ,. I —'-- J �-=+—� �--- � r•.' `I I'��_ _.� �— j- IF�a° I��j 1 C— r' � . , �-- - �--�r � ��^ ��: �--- � i i �'"...:---�. • 4 ��'_ .'i --�.. �--14���- � � '�' .�,c= ��-� i:° .+' `41 � `L—� . �s _I 1' ' . �I 1•� , �, •�' .�'� � � _' — _•--�x=-- L—�'�-� ' �---- - - - ---�------------------------------ - � - � - --------- - � -- �e 1+ifie riiri! . .�• v ._�.—vt —� ..sa.t•- sl y7i• 1 'e�:� � �. '.� . e . • r— � r;� �. '; : i ; m� a; t$� i � jr ' � 4'' � �--=--� r---�-`� , - I� a �„ � � a ;, z ���a � �9� � a� z � ": ` - ►----r-- �--,r� � . _ ' —'=—= j �--' —�j :.`y, � � � � .: 'i �-•---i'�'!—'' �-� ' :�v �'7 :.(A�4(3�.a' <7 f� �4 ' h-�—=�i-- �— :� <5� 6 ' �`. 26/ � ; :i�: I�, � 'L��=--� �-=--J- � � s . � , � ; . . :I; , `..� , i �;yn �, ��,� � , � � �: ' qr�; � �- _��= , B ,��, . zt, B � , �i! '�= �4�' � ,Y /.' I. � : i:;�� = i� _ . .•.rt �bi'� ,. x -+;---J�L-Tt ` � ' � � ; � �;. • al-t: � ._ �.. z� � % ��1: z� t�:�'�� � �. ,��.— ��_ . r ;:. : � �. �. � , ir � zn . ii a .� �1---�� � I � � -1 _e'�; /l � /9-_— yl� c /� � 1 �1 � �T— � r. � 1: : �:' ' � � (� • = (d : z /3 : /B -j • � : / / I � �'�"----a �.a ��+1 : � � . ;� , /�o \ � , L----� � ' � : . 1 ,/�o.li �'' EL Ql' AVE. '- - /30.70 � � ' M ` 1�/ej: '��' o � � r p �: � c LOCATION MAP L.S. ��94-01 Charles Westling ���� ��0�� � . �! I r z r� z FRID�EY za � v 2 a � za ,� H I G H �s 3 �� � 4 SCHOOL � n 4 it � • � , f ic f _ _ /7 � � I ► y i � ro 7 �y y • :2 ;, tiR � � � [f o • H AVE. � �i i � ip 9 �B . , ,8 • _, y . �, � ,�. , 3 . 2 / �+► . .(. Z /3 /o _':'- p_- � i.�- • 3� > � �'1 �:�••_�• j . -flC :. 2 . � ' _ - , !� �..-1q.1.- � e•. '.59TH. AV . •o . � . ii /o L � � /1' N � . iL ) � � 6l, � � � - __. • 4, , . ,s a ata LlT '� ;�S¢ �1�; s. 352 ic � ,s , io i -�d �i r �,c'- LEAG _ W . �r � z 9 z ��.-_ �3 � . � �J E LD. . �` � a 9 :e „ ,z ,3 + � . . :. �, . � • /� 3 .a ? � F 3 � -�A- '� �Z�-B t�i :•`-.��T,�;,� Z W MARIGOLD TERRACE b � 9 ? 4 I_ -��— r%i;�;;i:� > J ia 9' � •'�. ,'3 4 'O 4 . �, � �'� S - Z+ 4 � :f iI /3 i1 �• � .�'• ,z s i s G s T AV � 6 / �� � 9 . IG :c �7 rB i9 10 Z� 21 :3' S � � T �� ° - �r ,t 2 > � �a � 58 TH.' - N AVE � 14zr 4 3 � . :•?:• •a.•. .;p.• F �o � . . i/ u' } i 1 3 ' I• N . .' 9 f iC � 6 5 3 � 2 V • .. � Z � � F N. � .� �, G, � •� �,4' � A e+ 8 �,• L L Y 3 U� i j B 9 i / 4 j I I I 7 . /3 a, c w ir P aCF• • N.E. •z � Z H L NE PLACE W 1z � � �•is 8 � �'� " �S o �`' . �►-„ y • . `. • �;4�fb'. r4. •�� r�d„'i;56l�Gu/��3 +�• �o N'9' B�`: .� 3� 1 � u d �' u: _ � • ic - . . � � � •1 _.;�. • , .. — . ..N ., _ . � . . : v� ?o� • . ' . �`j�' `?H. '`IRV:EN ' . . � .. • , . (�j � S�.ZS 14 13 I. � le �9 iB !T ��.i o �l il ia �t it �s �� ' if :? ' Z ii fi fJ ,�t 7P � • /B /i . O /o s�l� �28� � • : : . � � N, } . N � , • ,y � V i� ,r � x• s �� � �• i Zo y�R ry�i if i� .•1 i1 ii ia ! 9 > > 4. j I �/� : J Q i 7� �Q, 1 � � � �A - .it �6 � W�� ��� � BR!DGEW oR�'� � CAR IE L� �� W rto• •,� • � � ! _. `_ . . .�. � � �� � F� f: Tu�i����i������.�v� v�����•���•�,.'y��•l.:ti•:�1. GO j �.•�; �•i �•: 1::l.�.��:i �:�.'..i:'i tir.�"� G� •�� �•��.�.���.:�: �1 � �a �� =�i �.,^..+:�': : �:i�r: L•� . . ...,.:..............:....:.:•.•.• .,:r.�: .-. N � � � . � ���i\�����I\�i�• i' � ��•,r�•�•i••�•�•�•:� �:� :�.��.� J-.� :.:.�. ti�. • . � �i '�� � .\�'�":\1.Cti:`.1.i �:Ll:i'� �'1'i 1:.i:�.�� �.i.�f.� �.L � + 567H. AVENU� . i.�:�'� . �:z:.� . ..... ..;.:......:•.:.j.:..•.:..•.•:•.t .•.�_.•.• .. +���i���t�����ti��•���� ♦•�v� �.'.��t.'}:.�..�:�'�.'���:L:t'��I. t'��r�'�.�. ��; �� � ,�� • ��:. ^�:��::l:t i:l:�:���i � .� •. .�.�. •.�n.�:�. ��• . .i.�'��:....lwi..... ..,.�.•.•...:i.•.�.•i.•. .� • .•�•�•�`�.+••`i; �. .t � : � •��r��������•il�� •i �«�� �: �� ���.l�:i.�.�.7. 'i.�.. ������•: : �i r ��'�:�.'. i \...i •:�7:�.�:�i��. � i��.v������i.� i.�.l:.} ,' i.�.l:�.�.�..l.i�i.�� �.��ti....����.r•� ':�:"�:�L��"�•�.'�' �., �.v�..`� ' `�v �•i � .�.. ��i� ��•�•:: :��'r ,r� . •i �.'..r:�'•.'J'::.i�j � 1'y'� l 1'/-�:�:.i.�:i:l:i�� •• � �i����ir�i �i��• ���:;�1. :'::i. i:'�•��.�i�.�•• i�/.•�•�..�.�.•i� �� i:.�.�. � .a� �'� Q � ..•.�•�a�rr•i�•�•i�,'[1_� a_.h.�_l.�:\'i:J:i.�.T.iSQ.!:' o .� i ►`f_1: - -----• -- _ —INTERSTATE HIGHWAY N0. S94 , �� D A • �-_ w 186 J � � f '+.: � �t � � � ��� X �� •�, d � • • • �• -T CHERI �i � -'- � � 4 1 ; LANE �, • � - N � a . �- � _ . � 1� - : ` `��L :::��.: . � .- .s . .-- _ ►- z� � � E, �..� _ r ,P `'� � . � • -i - i - 54 TH. AvENUE. N.E. Z4 DISTRICT LEGEND � �A ❑ Y-1 t1OHT INDUSTPIAL O _ p-1 ONE FAMILY DWQ'S p-p TWO FAMIIY DWO'S ❑ Y-Y HEAVY INOU6TXIAl � - I •� _ - �� � q-3 �EN. MUtTIPLE DWG'S � PUD VLANNED UNIT DEV. � q-♦ YOBIIE NOME PANK � S-1 HIfDE PAHK NEIQHBORHOOD ❑ � ;a p • P PUBUC FACIlIT1ES Q 5-Y REDEVELOPNENT DISTRICT -� �" �• d 0 O-1 CREEN 8 RIVEN PNESERVATION � a C-1 LOCAL BUS�NESS �•� � � - - �- C�7 GENEXAL BUSINESS � O-2 CRITICAL AflEA � 515 1 ..• � C-3 CENENAL SNOPVING � ��� ■ _ � r C-N1 CENEflAI OFFICE � VACATED STPEETS � ZONING 11�11AP� � � �� �� . �� W z . � U . Z � 4 a 3� z � -r L.S. 4194-0I Charles Westling . � , .• t i I � i � . . � . - �o r - ti � r�i O M W . � i .. : � � � . .:. . . , . � . � ti l`RA-��--:A -- .� - ,� . ; . . : . Q "' 18,047 sq. ft. �-- � . 3 , ! . w � � � � W }. � - -- - t�_ � � 3Q � - -� L - -.-- --- M � i i i � � 4.i . _� � � � � Y� ; I wj N -- ---- --- - ---- �.. _ _ � o � ' � n, O I � Z i Z � SOUTH LINE�LOT 13 I L � , � N88°38�35��W I18.86 -- -_ ' � � • , ai.i ' V , _ �� • � `/ . � l� � r' .. N � �N . � � 35.6 �n 5.0 � t0 HOUSE � . �'7•3 % N_ —_ � __ ^ _._. _.—.._"._ Q�.B �..$.� O � - � T RACT B . �. �� ° � i ., N� � �� 15,437 sq.ft � - --- --- c� - -24.2 _ a p j I _. __--- - v GARAG N-- ., �. :�,' VACATED zaz �,:: 60 i 54th AVENUE NE -,' �N88°38�35��W --- 161.90-- �/ /FENCE' ��/1 � h NV L. O E `� � i12 -- - _ _ .-_ I � N SITE PLAN -.., . � �, /"�, L.S. 1�94-01 Charles Westling . o, /, i � I/ . I . , ,, , =' 6 0 . . � - � - . . � / . . ; - . � . . � ,� : . � . ;.. � T � . � . �; .. � . . ,. � � . , � . . � � � � : . - .. � � . .. � . . `� .;� . -. -- --- � � � �: a � / T � I 3Q ; � '.. . � . . : � . : � - �? � . �-%: � ' . � ' ' z i� ° • � , ti . . • ' ,/� `h .` � � i �C ` ,� _�� � -T, -�--- �, / :� "'�� I , 7 sq.�ft. F-- 3 ' ; : I..l.J o ,� - � , � U - . -�.�- c� .�: CD I ! 5�' � j � �; � Z � � � : '�� � � .._. Z � `n �,' . . � �y. - J. � J -_ - - � �r , � � ti ° � � z h � SOU TH LI N E LOT I 3� �s i � � 'f I N 88° 38� 35�� W- I I 8.86 -- - � � , , —� 41.1 � � � � � -� i r i : ' In � (.r. N� . . r.: , .. j,r �35.6 �nl 5.0 � "' °��`� - SITE PLAN L • � -� ~. . V . ' i �. � V r "' .� r . S ti . ., j � � 1 . •. • �. J . r � c " ' - • ' � ; • . . .. • � • 4 Q � . c1 Q. � ' � y ' _ � y a . f ? " � ' _ �' � ' :. ' �.r. �, • � L . ' • � . . • � �' ' . a . . �y: � . . . ' � • ' • . . .� � . • s,e, . . . , � r ' ' lr a0 . • ' o r � a �/i . � v � � _ -. • L.S. i�94-01 Charles Westling • ,.• • . • .... . : -' t3�-.� . Q . • • ` : ' .. • . . • � � Z . � c � J Z � � a p , U � � . �; i � 6 , _ �. = 9 C � i C Q. 1 ' .- - o d" � � • l Y C� e! _ �� � .� � �° V� 2 � I . - � . � z Y � �1 � (� U� U- `� C }.��.. � a I ` ✓ � �' � �.� C � � 1`� � Y' � -�' c � l � _ � .�,• ' G . � �o -\_._ ` Y. ��.._—�--� - � , . r _ t� � �: � .Q � � �F r `� ��� r (�, � cf� b Y i `! �'. �.. � ,—� CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. � ERIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LOT SPLIT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: _ �� `� � c� �� �� � `t- i.l .'t � �r; ; t�. � : � . � . Property Identification Number (PIN) ' Legal description: � � � � Lot _ _(� -- i b � Block 1 %- 'TracdAddition �i �• ��' �-► `'= T� ut� , � � ��f �,�� � � • �+ , �. ` � . Gurrent zqning: � h -, � S�quare �footagelacre�ge : : 3 3 � y �S `i � �= . � - Reason for. lot split: ��' ; � � n �-► . � �- � � � � � � � Have• you operated a .business in a eity which reyaired •a business license?. - � � . � . � • � : � �Yes � . No � � � If�yes, �vhich�city? � � � � � �„� If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) , NAMF (� �/ :�=►-.-r � �- -c i � . i .: : �- �. r . . �- � � ADDRESS i 2 � - 7ln � �1�-' � `-� �2 i D . � ,. .e DAYTIME PHONE � �1 Z. - c� � Z �i SIGNATURE C� i,�, � • '� , U�e,.� � DATE `� - Z �' `� � PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DAYTIME PHONE DATE Fee: $250.00 � Peimit L.S. # �' �'I -O I Receipt # � �� I _ � Application received by: Scheduled Planning Commission date: �'��u' ��� % c/ y Scheduled City Council date: �, � ;�r ���� '�' F .:. � ,n'm..+C.� +3 ' i�� _ .t�f,�� ��;��. C1TY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUN(CIPAL CENTER • 6431 UN1�'ERS[TY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN ii.�;? •(61?) S71-3450 • FAX (612) 571-12K7 June 10, 1994 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The City of Fridley Planning Com�ission•will be holding an informal hearing on a lot split, L.S. #94-01, by Charles Westling, to split Lots 6- 16, Block 12, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville into two separate lots, generally located'at 5400 - 4th Street N.E. The legal descriptions for the two lots are as follows: Tract A: Lots 6,. 7,,8, 9,�10, 11, 12, and 13, Block 12, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Anoka � . County, Minnesota, except.that part lying westerly of �,,,� the east right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 47 (University Avenue N.E.) Tract B: Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 12, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Anoka County, Minnesota, together with that part of vacated 54th Avenue N.E. and the vacated alley accruing, except that part lying westerly of the east right- of-way line of State Trunk Highway NO. 47 (University Avenue N.E.) Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, June 29, 1994 at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 571- 3450. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than June 22, 1994. . •-. DAVID NEWMAN CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION �, . 9, � i"�. �� L.S. ��94-0] Charles Westling Charles Westling 125 - 76th Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Darrell Koopman . 5397 Altura -Road �N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Thomas Comtners 5337 Altura Road N.E. Fridley, NIN 55421 Gerald �Bak�r 5347.Altura Road N.E. Fridley, MN' S5421� Richard Motter 5357 Altura Road N.E. Fridley, I�IN : 554;21 Paul Corbett 5367 Altura Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Walter Olstead 5377 Altura Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Michael Schroeder 5387 Altura Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Planning MAILING LIST Council Current Resident 5410 - Sth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Neil Schuld.t . . 2634 - 116th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Current Resident 5400 - 5th Street N.E. F.'ridley,� MN 55421 � • Samuel Hertogs 999 Westvi,ew Drive . Hastings, I.KN 55033 Current Resident 5�+01 - 4th Street N.E.. F;idley�, �MN� 5-5421: James Weatherly � � 5114 Nicollet Minneapolis, MN 55419 Current Resident 5400 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 6/]0/94 Harlan King 5436 - Sth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 5542] Current Residenf � 5428 - S.th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Jain Pankaj' 5430 - Sth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 James Peng 6 We.st Logan - West St. Paiil, MN 55118 Elroy/Rinehart Kurtz 5420�- 5th Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 5542.I Stephen Lischalk 5357 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Larry Nelson 5323 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Current Resident Current Resident 5419 - 4th Street N.E. 5339 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Fridley, MN 55421 Douglas Fiege John Jensen ��ohn Prebarich 5461 - 4th Street N.E. 6070 - 6th Street N.E. 10704 - llth Avenue North Fridley, MN 55421 Fridley, MN 55421 Plymouth, MN 55441 Violet Butgusaim 5459 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Deborah Hobson 5457 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Patricia 0'Bannon 5455 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 LuRoy Krumweide 5435 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Steven Smith 5423 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Joseph Vasecka 5427 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55421 Current Resident 5450 - Sth Street.N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Richard Tkaczik 12323 Gladiola N.W. Coon Rapids, NIN 55433 Current Resi3ent 5347 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55421 Duane Schwartz 2525 - 118th Avenue Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Curtis Lindberg 5353 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, NIIJ 55421 Current Resident 5380 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 L �� U L.S. #94-01 Charles Westling Page 2 Current Resident 5370 - 5th Street N.E. `• �Fridley, NIN 55421 � r '� ugene Welter � 5704 - 56th Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55429 Michael Anderson 5360 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55421 Steven Soderholm 5336 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Current Resident 5333 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 �„� Jerome Schurstein ' 1102 - 43 1/2 Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Current Resident 5384 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Eugene Wright `. 1848 Pumice Point - Eagan, MN 55122 Joyce Zimmerman 5380 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55421 Richard Kappes 3129 Webster Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55416 Current Resident 5370 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Thomas Zandlo 5334 - 4th Street N.E. � Fridley, MN 55421 Homer Melton 5334 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Current Resident 5330 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Herbert Ledo 5326 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Planning Comm. Chair City Council Members � -- ,---y � �� / � , ���� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PL�?►NNING DNISION City of Fridley June 21, 1994 Planning Commission Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Steven Barg, Planning Assistant 1994 CDBG Human Service Funding Recommendations On June 9, 1994, the Human Resources Commission (HRC) met to develop the funding recommendations for the 1994 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Human Service funding allocation. Listed below are the HRC's funding recommendations for 1994. Attached to this memo is a copy of the unapproved meeting minutes further explaining their decision. Or4anization Alexandra House Arc of Anoka County Central Center for Family Resources CHAP Store City of Fridley Recreation Community Emergency Assistance Program F'amily Counseling Clinic Northeast Northwest Suburban Kinship R.I.S.E. St. Philip's Lutheran Church Tamarisk Recommendation This Year's Reuuest $ 4,500 $ 1,400 $ 3,000 $ 3,968 $ 5,000 $ 3,000 $60,000 $ 1,500 $ 5,000 $ 3,000 $ 7,735 $98,103 Amount Recommended $ 2,500 $ -0- $ 1,000 $ 3,000 $ 5,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 500 $ -0- $ 3,000 $ 4,000 $25,000 Staff requests that the Planning Commission review this item and express any concerns or requests for changes to the funding recommendations. The Council will consider these recommendations and make its final decision on the funding recommendations at its July 11, 1994, meeting. SB:ls M-94-349 � : 1 HUMAN RE30IIRCE8 COMMISSION MEETING, JLJNE 9, 1994 PAGE 2 � � yea�r, they s�rved 111 geople from the. City of Fridley. The rec�uest is for advocate salary and in-service training. It is not as if the program is not as good as last year, they just have less money to work with. She believed $3,000 is a fair amount because they are getting a good return on the investment. Mr.� Coverston agreed. Mr. Welf agreed with Ms. Mau's comments, but he re�ommended $2,500 in .funding. . � Amount Recommended - $2,500 _�� Arc of Anoka Countv�- Request: 51,400 0 Ms. Mau recommended� no funding this year, partly�because -the� � served only 3-4 people in the City last year. This means it cost $200-$250.per person, and.they cannot help enough people with the . small amounts that the City of Fridley is providing. She felt the � money co.uld be funneled into other.programs�where it could i�e use.� . . by: more peopl� . � � . . . . . - .. � Mr�. Welf agreed. ,--� Mr. Coverston stated he went with the thought that there are 3-4 that will not go to camp this year. `J Mr. Welf stated there are other programs with better records for serving more people. Ms. Mau stated this agency gets funding from other sources so they have other sources for these kids. Amount Recommended - $ -0- Central Center for Family Resources - Request: 53,000 Ms. Mau stated this is the same program as last year. It does not fit "new and innovative". The organization gets funding from other sources. She would personally rather see funding go to those who do not have other resources. She recommended no funding unless funds were available after ttie other allocations were made. Mr. Welf stated they talked about going to the schools and dealing with children at the schools. They did not say anything about what happens after school closes. He would also recommend no funding based on the fact that this is not new and does not fit the criteria. � � a � �. HIIMAN RESOIIRCE3 COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 9, 1994 PAGE 3 Mr. Coverston stated he i� concerned.about�the.fact that.there�is a waiting list and they cannot help all those who come to them. He recommended funding because of the waiting list. Amount Recommended - $1,000 CHAP (Carinq, Helpina and Providinq) CorQ. - Request: 53,968 Ms. Mau stated she was impressed with the program. They have 93 �amilies in Fridley alone. They are expanding constantly, and they are totally nonprofit. Mr. Welf stated he visited the store. The store is well run and the staff was working fiard. I.f these pe.ople get displaced.during the funding.year and do not serve the Fridley.area, he recommends • funding be cut off for the period �hey are not there.• Ms. Mau stated what impressed her the most was that the people do r�ot draw any money out of it. Everything that comes in goes back to the people. ". .� � � ' .� . . . �Mr. Coverston stat�d he q�iestioned � in the � budget� the. $5, 000 in tithes. He was not sure this was appropriate for an agency serving � others. � Mr. Barg stated they can stipulate the money is to be used under certain circumstances. If not, the funds will not be allocated. CHAP may have a plan in place for what they are going to do if they are displaced from their current location. Mr. Oquist stated he understood this agency wanted to be in this area in order to service more people. The.money was requested for insurance. Ms. Mau stated she would recommend funding of $3,000. Mr. Coverston stated he was impressed with the services provided and how much they provide as individuals. He recommended funding between $1,500-$2,500 because he was not sure that the tithing was appropriate for an agency serving others. Mr. Oquist stated this is a new request, an innovative program, and they are serving a large number of people. Ms. Mau stated she liked the idea that they are asking for something that is a basic need. They are not pulling any money out. If they need help with insurance, she thinks it is okay. Mr. Oquist stated they have good control. They serve 93 families. " He recommended $3,000. � i HIIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMI33ION MEETING, JIINE 9, 1994 PAGE 4 � ,� Mr. Barg stated that if the tithing is a concern, he can contact CHAP and ask about it. Amount Recommended - $3,000 City of Fridley � - Recreation and Natural Resource Department - Rectuest: 55,000 Ms. Mau stated the program showed real positive results last year. The response was good. They served a 1ot of kids, and 100% of the funding went to scholarships. This year, they figured out a way to have shared districts. She could not come up with a reason to not fund for another year. They are changing the program.. She foresees the program growing:to be something that will.include all the�.school districts in'the City and�still have'many opportunities • for the kids. �She r.ecommended full funding. � � �' �� Mr. Coverston stated they are certainly serving a lot of kids. Mr. Oqui.st stated it is i�nportant that they learned �from��last� year. -� • They are �raorking wit17� the other school � districts to . expand �he � program. It is a viable program, and he would recommend funding .for one more year to a11ow the program to expand. � . � Mr. Welf stated the program still fits into the criteria for � funding. Ms. Mau stated she checked to see how the summer programs were going. They are getting a good sign-up. One program they did not get good participation on last year was.called Blast which was two days a week from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., and the kids did a variety of activities. This year the participation is up. The program seems to be catching on. Mr. Oquist stated kids tend to shy away from a program the first time but, when they hear from others how much fun it was, they want to go and participation increases. Ms. Mau stated this is also keeping kids busy. Amount Recommended: $5,000 Communit Emer enc Assistance Pro ram Inc. - Re est: 3 000 Ms. Mau stated they served 906 families or 2,700 individuals last year from Fridley alone. That is a major amount of participation for Fridley people. Mr. Coverston stated he liked the approach to provide unusual ways in which they help those who would have trouble getting help. ''� ,•--. � HIIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 9. 1994 PAGE 5 Ms. Mau stated she liked the way they.help•fam�lies their own. More programs like this will be needed if minimum welfare bill is passed. CEAP is one of those moves people along better than other programs. Amount Recommended - $3,000 get going on the two-year programs that Familv Counselinq Clinic Northeast - Request: 560,000 Ms. Mau stated she liked the program. No one gets paid. They do this on a volunteer basis. Two thousand people were served. When she first read the request, she did not like it; but when she found out these were volunteer hours and staff was not drawing a salary for its �.time, �she was convinced. She .recominended �$3, OU0 to � get them going. �They also'do not get funding froin other sources. Mr. Welf stated he felt $3,000 is a fair amount considering this is the first request. . Mr. Oquist stated this is a first-time program. Amouint Recommended - $3, 00�0. Northwest Suburban Rinship, Inc. - Request: 51,500 Ms. Doody stated that, at this point, she could care less if the program is not funded or given $1,500. They can use $1,500. They can use $5,000. She is more concerned about the way she has been treated in the past by the Commission. She is concerned about the Commission members who met with the program's representative and the way she was treated last year and more so this year. Because Ms. Peka is a handicapped person, theg are trying to help her minimally by giving her a salary for her services at $5.00 per hour. Who among those present would work for $5.00 an hour? With the way she was treated, she came back to Ms. Doody and her self- esteem was zero. Ms. Doody felt her representative was badly treated. Her program works with kids with low self esteem. Ms. Doody stated that before coming to the meeting, she received a call from a parent who wanted her child in the program. As of this time and as of a year ago, there is no way the program can take kids from Fridley first. She tells the parents the name will be put on a waiting list, but they will not be on the top. She advises parents to talk to their Councilmember or Commission member. Unfortunately, the parents are not going to make the waves move. Ms. Doody stated she has not deleted names from the waiting list; but if Blaine, Anoka, Coon Rapids, Andover and other cities are '"`' funding Kinship with CDBG monies and Fridley is not, there is no _ way she can serve Fridley in the same way as the other cities. � � � BIIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 9. 1994 PAGE 6 � There is no way she can honor the- kids from�Fridley as. a first- come, first-serve when they are not being funded. She takes a grievance from her staff when a person was treated the way this person felt whether it was the Commission's intent or not. Mr. Oquist stated he was very impressed with Ms. Peka's presentation and had every intent of providing funding for the program this year. She did a very nice job of making the presentation and answering questions. Ms. Doody stated her complaint is that Ms. Peka� did not come away feeling that way. Ms. Doody voiced her concerns to Mr. Barg. Ms. Peka's self esteem was nil. . Mr. Oquist stated this was�not done by�this Coiamission:: The Cominission meinbers concurred. . Ms. Mau assured Ms. Doody that'Ms.•�Peka was treated wi:th respect, ., and the Commission�memliers asked��her the�same kinds of questions • they asked every one�else:. She had a much.more.:positi,ve feeling tiian � she had the � previous year. � � " - . � � Mr. Coverston stated that after talking with Ms. Peka, he had a favorable feeling about the program. Ms. Doody was provided with a copy of the minutes of the previous meeting. Mr. Oquist stated her representative was treated just like the other speakers. He did not realize she had a handicap. She appeared to be nervous but all the presenters are nervous. She answered the questions very well. Ms. Mau stated she went back to read the minutes because she could not believe the comments made in the memo. The Commission members asked Ms. Peka questions just like anyone else. Mr. Oquist stated she presented the program very well, and she answered the questions very well. Mr. Welf asked if there was something specific that she did not like. Ms. Doody stated Ms. Peka felt she did not receive respect. She felt someone supposedly made a comment that they would not fund because they did not qualify and did not answer all of the questions. Secondly, the financial statement was not copied with the report and she said she could not find it. � � � HIIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMIS3ION MEETING, JIINE 9, 1994 PAGE 7 Mr.. Welf stated he had asked about that information and had questioned whether this was an incomplete application. There was no comment made about not funding_because of it. Mr. Oquist stated he was impressed with the presentation of the program. This program is similar to Big Brother/Big Sister, which had 32 matches in the City. Mr. Welf stated Kinship had no additional matches in Fridley last year from the few matches in the previous year. Ms. Doody stated they did not receive CDBG funding from Fridley this past year. � Mr. Welf stated that when he hears that; he_ gets �the -�feeling .that . �this program does not have a pro bono spirit and that maybe�th�.re is more interest in the funding than in helping the children. This is what it looks like on the surface. Ms. Doody stated that if he had read what they said and�documented. •'. how many hours are� .put into a safe •match,. etc. , he ' would not say. that . � � ' . . � Mr. Welf asked what the expense is after the match is made. Ms. Doody stated they monitor the match. They also have high insurance costs. For example, if someone alleges sexual misconduct, they can come after the program, staff, board members, etc. The insurance covers the program and those associated in the program. Volunteers coming into the program must provide ten references. Mr. Oquist stated the procedure at the last meeting was to limit the presentations to 15 minutes so he would like to limit comments to that at this time. Ms. Doody stated she appreciated the questions which shows an interest in the community, Ms. Mau stated there are four volunteers from Fridley now. It comes down to the same problem with other programs which is the number served with the amount of money. She thought the money is better spent where is serves the most people. Mr. Welf stated he is concerned that there is a problem getting volunteers. To him, this shows no interest in the program by the general public. He didn't see that he could support the program. Mr. Coverston stated he was impressed with the presentation of the '�'' staff person. In view of that and to provide encouragement and _ support for the program, he would recommend funding at $1,000. 1 � HUMAN RE30IIRCE3 COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 9, 1994 PAGE 8 Mr. Oquist stated he was �also impressed and felt it was time to fund the program. He is concerned about the four volunteers and the interest that shows. He is not sure about the advertising or how others know about the program. He recommended $500. Mr. Coverston stated that in looking at the budget, the amount of the program is stated as $2,000. How much of the staffing is also programming? Ms. Mau stated the� staff costs are high compared to the program costs. In looking at the budget proposal for ne� year, program administration of $15,700, executive board for.$2,0�0,. health insur.ance at �$3., 500; .. anc� pragram cost� of• �$2; 479. . .'�hat �:is bothersoine to her� because so much of the money � is .going to. expenses � rather than helping the kids•. Program administration co's�s for next year are budgeted at $20,000. � Mr. Welf stated that, to a certain degree, this is because of the tim� it� takes to set it up.. . , � � _ � Ms..Mau�agreed, but that is where she is having.a prob�em. The actual cost of the presgram is so much. The rent is in-kind whicYr means this is being provided so that they are not actually paying rent. Ms. Doody stated the total budget includes the in-kind gifts the program receives, including the volunteers for activities. Ms. Mau stated the receptionist is also listed as in-kind. But nothing else is listed that way, which means those are actual e�enses . Ms. Doody stated to have a safe match means staff interviews the volunteers. They have only a half-time person and volunteer hours. She is being paid and Ms. Peka is paid. Ms. Mau asked who was paid under program administration e�ense. Ms. Doody stated she was paid under program administration expense. The projected figures are not the same as the actual. Ms. Mau stated the actual figure on the budget is $17,775. She wanted to know where the money is being channeled. The payroll for Ms. Peka is $12,000 for next year. She would go along with $500 to motivate and see how many Fridley kids are actually served next year. Mr. Welf stated he could go along with that. He would like to have the figures in on time next year. � �� � ♦ f !"'� AIIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 9. 1994 PAGE 9 Ms. Doody stated it takes 12 hours to process one child. For the salary, they went with the reasonable rate. . Ms. Mau stated that the Commission received good infornaation from Ms. Peka. She wished to clarify that $500 needs to be spent on Fridley kids or it comes back. Ms. Doody stated this amount will not help that many kids. They receive more from other cities. Mr. Oquist stated it is possible that other cities have more funds to dispense. This Commission gets a fixed amount to allocate as set by the City Council.� Ms. Doody stated 15% of the total CD$G funds iriust gb�to huxnan servic�s. If a city does not use their funds, other cities can pick up those funds. Mr. Barg stated the amount represented for allocation is 23% of the total. � � � � Mr. Oqu�ist stated there have always been more requests for funds than funds to allocate. �. _ Amount Recommended - $500 RISE, Inc. - Request: $5,000 The consensus of the Commission was to not fund. Amount Recommended - $ -0- St. Philip•s Lutheran Church - Request: 53,000 Ms. Mau stated in looking at that age group, $5 per month to insure the safety of your child after school is very positive. This is a new program. It can serve many kids. It meets the criteria. There exists the possibility that many kids may be served through this program. Mr. Coverston stated the program is also open to those who can come from the other school districts as well. Amount Recommended - $3,000 Tamarisk Resources, Inc - Request• $7,735 Ms. Mau stated this program served 21 Fridley families with home � care. They trained 20 new volunteers. This is the same program as last year but she would like to give it one more year as a pilot � a . n � �f � HIIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 9. 1994 PAt�L 10 pragram. This is difficult bec�use so much goes to expense.- Because it is new and�different;.she would go along with $4,�00. Mr. Coverston agreed. Mr. Welf stated the eost per person served is very high. But, it is also needed because there is no one els� in the ' area that is providing this service. There is no duplication of service. He would agree with $4,000. Amount Reaommended - $4,000 MOTION by�Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr.:Welf,_to recommend to:the City Council the CDBG fu�ding alloca,�ions as fol�ow$: =•.�. �.� � � ` This Year's Amo�,tnt � Organization . Request Recommended Alexandra House $ �,500 $ 2,500 : Arc of � Ar�oka' County � $ 1, 400'� $�-0- , . Central Center for F�mily Resources CHAP Stare Gity of Fridley Recreation Comm�unity Emergency Assistance Program Family Counseling Clinic $ 3,000 $ 3,968 $ 5,000 $ 3, OQO $ 1,000 $ 3,000 $ 5,000 $ 3,fl00 NortYieast $60,00� $ �,000 Northwest Suburban Rinship $ 1,500 $ 5Q0 R.I.S.E. $ 5,000 $ -0- St. Philip's Lutheran Church_ $ 3,000 $ 3,D00 Tamarisk $ 7,735 $ 4,000 $98,103 $25,000 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALI� VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQIIIST DECI,ARED T8E MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOIISLY. Mr. Barg stated the Planning Commission will review this recommendation at its June 29, 1994, meeting, and the City Council will discuss it at its meeting.on July ll. �. �� �'"� � � �. 5 HIIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING, JQNE 9, 1994 PAGE 11 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion/Consideration of Commission's Focus and Possible Agenda Items for Remainder of 1994 Mr. Barg requested ideas for discussion and/or consideration by the Commission. He has had someone from the State of Minnesota talk to him about discrimination in the City and the workplace, and he would be willing to come out and talk about what is going on and what some of the problems are. Mr. Oquist stated he liked the idea of how the City is perceived' by the outside community and by those who live here. He �would �like see how others feel from the single-parent family or minority perspective. If the City is' being perceived negatively, perhaps there is something that can be done. Ms. Mau stated they might be able to find a group to develop this program to work in the schools with the kids about discrimination issues. It depends on which parents you talk to as to what feedback you receive about the problems in the "° schools. As a parent, she does not see a problem in the middle school. In the high school, there seems to be some problems in the upper grades. Perhaps they could find a way to develop a program in the City to alleviate this before serious problems develop. Mr. Oquist stated he has noticed more integration in the City, and this is something we may need to look at. Mr. Coverston stated, in his observations, there does not appear to be a problem. Ms. Mau stated she thought most of the problem is caused by the minority of the people. She has tried to expose her child to different cultures. Her fear is that her child in high school will only have exposure to the those few who are the "bad" kids. There is the feeling that some of the minority kids get special treatment, which is resulting in bad feelings. Ms. Doody stated that from a teacher's point of view, she would think twice before reprimanding students from different races because of the repercussions. Mr. Oquist stated there is now much concern about being ,•-� politically correct that it is affecting the relationships. � .. . . . � _ - � -� 'ti. . �,� ��. i� � „ ' . _ .. . _ �: "� . �� �` �.. � 4.,f � � ; ., -. . �<' . �. � � . t. � t 'i HQMAN REBOIIRCBB COMMISSION MEETIN�3,�JDNE 9 � 1994 PAt3L 12 �, ��, Mr. 8arg stated ar�other a.ssue for discussion eould be the American Disabilities 'Act. He cari try ta get _some information from the Inspection Department about City buildings whose ` owners are nat making an attempt to c�mply. �Complaints'made to the State do not necessarily come to the.C3.ty. Mr. t�quist� stated he would think somethinq woul,d come back. If you do not keeg-up on things, they tend to b� forgatten. Mr. Barg stated he has- listed �s possible topics a surv�y, , diversity, discrimination,.and disabiiities.' He wi�.l d� more- work in these ar�as. ADJOIIRNMEPiT' ° M�TION by Mac. Welf, seconded by Mr. Cover"ston, to adjflu�n the meeting.' . ; _ UPON A V�32CE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY$, CHAIRPERSON OQIIZST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRXED �f1�TD THE JUNE 9,' 199�, �l[UM�N RESQURCES COMMISSION MEETING ADJ4URNED AT 8t53 P.M. ; - � s ectfully s mitted, �. vonn Cooper � Recording SecretarQr =- . -� � ' , F.�,� .