The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 10/19/1994 - 6942PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING WEDNE3DAY, OCTOBER 19, 1994 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC COPY �^ ,�"� � City of Fridley A G E N D A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1994 7:30 P.M. LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER• ROLL CALL• APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: October 5, 1994 CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT L S. #94-06, BY DAVID STEWART: To split Lot 3, Block 2, Sexter Addition, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota into two parts: Parcel A: the south 35 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Sexter Addition; and Parcel B: that part of Lot 3, Block 2, Sexter Addition lying north of the north 35 feet of said Lot 2, This property is generally located at 5720 Polk Street. ^ PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #94- 16. BY DAVID STEWART: Per Section 205.07.01.C.(7) of the Fridley City Code, to allow automobile parking for adjacent uses, on the south 35 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Sexter Addition, generally located at 5720 Polk Street N.E. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REOUEST. ZOA #94-03, BY DAVID STEWART• To rezone from C-1, Local Business to R-1, Single Family Dwelling, to allow parking and dumpster placement on the easterly 120 feet except the northerly 135 feet of that part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision #25, which is described as follows to wit: beginninq at a point on the north line of said Auditor's Subdivision distant 221.7 feet east of the northwest corner thereof which point is also on the centerline of Central Avenue, then east on said north line a distance of 270.8 feet, then south a distance of 308.2 feet to a point on a line parallel with & 160 feet north of the most southerly line of said Lot 1 which point is 437.44 feet distant east from the centerline of Central Avenue, then west along a line parallel with & 160 feet north of the most southerly line of said Lot 1, 437.44 feet to the centerline of Central Avenue, then northeasterly along said centerline to the point of beginning and except the north 30 feet thereof said 120 feet to be measured along the north line of saicl ,� Lot 1. This property is generally located West of 5720 Polk Street and north of Moore Lake Apartments. Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Wednesday, October 19, 1994 Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION REOUEST SAV #94-03 BY MEARLIN NORDSTROM: To vacate that part of the drainage and utility easements which lie six feet on both sides of the line between Lot 8 and Lot 9, Block 2, Holiday Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota, and between said Lot 9 and Lot 8, Block 1, Holiday Hills Second Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, and which lie within the boundary of the following described tract: That part of Lot 8, Block 2, Holiday Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of said Lot 8, 15 feet northeasterly of the most southerly corner thereof, thence northwesterly to the most westerly corner of said Lot 8 and there terminating; also Lot 9, Block 2, Holiday Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota; also that part of Lot 8, Block 1, Holiday Hills Second Addition, lying southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the westerly line of said Lot 8, 55 feet northwesterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 8; thence to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 8, 99.65 feet from the most southerly corner of said Lot 8 and there terminating. This property is generally located at 501 Rice Creek Boulevard N.E. � RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL 4UALITY AND ENERGY � COMNiISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 20 1994 f RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 11. 1994 OTHER BUSINESS• ADJOURNMENT �"1 c ,� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNINa CO1�I88ION MESTING� OCTOBEA 5�_1994 CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Newman called the October 5, 1994, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Dave Newman, Dave Rondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig Diane Savage Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Steve Woodley, Wal-Mart - Lynn Porath, Turning Point Adu1t Day Care Kareri Russell, St. Philip's Church Art Swanson, Theisen Partnership Nonaa Swanson, Theisen Partnership Jim Yungner, The Gym, Inc. �� Bea Springer,.Theisen.Partnershig_,;._ ; Fran Theisen, : Theisen Partnership =; . A__ . . . . . Bob Theisen, Theisen Partnership . � Jan Westfall,`�'-Turninq Point �Adult Da�4 Care y�'�� i_:r Linda Newmann, :: Turning � Point.: Adult Day;: Care ,°� Rathy O�Connell, McCombs, Frank, Roos & Associates Mike Gair, McCombs, Frank, Roos & Associates Paul Carlson, Close & Associates � Gar Hargans,> Close & Associates � 4;�, . - . '�G: d .. M1.. _ , ... APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 21:'1994, PLANNING�=COMMISSION MINUTES: >�t:<.: � , .,.., , . . MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist,,to-approve the�; september 21, �1994, Planning Commission minutes as'> written: ��. �y,f ; , . �F; �' ,s IIPON A VOICE VOTE � ALL VOTINt3 :AYB'� ': CSAIRPLRSON �:NEWM�T'-: DLCLARED >` � THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ;. . , . 1. �94-14 �BY WAL-MART STORES. INC.: Per Section 205.14.01.C.(13). of the Fridley City Code, to allow the expansion of an existing garden center on Lot 1, Bl�ock 1, Wal-Mart in Fridley, the same being 8450 University Avenue N.E. � �'� Ms. McPherson stated the request is to expand the existing built garden center located on the east side of the building. At the PLANNINa COMMISSION MEETING. OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGB 2 last meeting, the Commission discussed the use of the garden center for off season storage of inerchandise as well as the existence of dropped trailers at the rear�of the building and some unscreened pallets and baled cardboard in the trailer parking area to the south of the building. _ Ms. McPherson stated the Commission tabled the request to allow staff to work with the petitioner to resolve the issues of the trailer, baled cardboard, and pallet storage. Staff inet with the petitioner on September 27, 1994 to discuss the outdoor storage items. The petitioner agreed to immediately discontinue storage of materials in the temporary walled space in the garden center. They are working to remove the wall, move the merchandise from within that area, and store it in the dropped trailers. Staff proposed three alternatives to resolve the outdoor storage of the trailers and the pallets and baled,cardboard as follows: 1. 2. 3. Extend the building. Find adjacent off-site warehouse space. Screen the items. n Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner indicated that Wa1-Mart r-� corporate would be<in;contact with staff regarding the-options: �,. and what Wal-Mart proposed in ternas of a solution.. Late. on ��; October 5,-` 1994, staff_:received a-- letter: from Mr.'-`Torrey�;:Herd;;: Project Manager, Wal-Mart�Stores,.Inc.,_ which in.concept°:states that Wal-Mart is willing to screen the trailers as well as.the pallets and baled cardboard, and that they would meet with staff on October 13 to determine suitable structure and design elements to accomplish that goal. With that, staff recommends approval of the request with the_following stipulations: _ � 1. No garden sales.shall occur-in the�parking lot as�conducted -'� in 1994. 2. The petitioner shall not be permitted to display products on�;:�� ; the front sidewalk. ' . _ - : .: ;, � 3. 4. The petitioner shall. create a storage area to the rear of the building for trailer, pallet and baled cardboard storage. The design of the storage area shall meet w'ith City approval. The landscaping and irrigation displaced by the above activities is to be relocated. Mr. Oquist stated the second stipulation does not permit products on the front sidewalk. Does this also affect the mini-donut sales? f PLANNING COMMI88ION MELTIN(3, OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGE 3 Ms. McPherson stated the owners for the donut sales have a special use permit for that purpose. Wal-Mart cannot display the merchandise they sell, such as swingsets, patio furniture, etc. Mr. Saba asked if they could apply for a special use permit for sidewalk display. Ms. McPherson stated they cannot. Mr. Newman asked when this would go before the City Council. Ms. McPherson stated the Council would review the request on October 17, so the resolution which would come on October 13 would be forwarded to the City Council. Mr. Newman stated the meeting with Mr. Herd on October 13 should solve the issue of the storage area. Ms. McPherson stated this was correct.-�•- Mr. Sielaff asked when this becomes an enforcement issue. Ms. McPherson stated the City issued in 1994 a one-year special � use permit to allow.a garden;center..in the parking lot in lieu of them coming up with a.proposed-�expansion plan. So, there is not an enforcement issue. . � � , Mr. Woodley, Store°:Manager;°:stated_he met.with.staff. What they are talking about is reasonable. Regarding the display of merchandise on the sidewalk, are sidewalk sales part of that stipulation? Ms. McPherson stated.she believed the City has allowed�sidewalk sales as long as.they.are not..a continuing, or�-going practice. ,. .. - , .�, ..,: . . . . MOTION by Mr. Saba,�seconded,;by-Mr.�:Kondrick,: to approve Special Use Permit, SP°#94-14;-by Wa1-Mart:;°Stores, Inc. to allow the expansion of an existing garden.center�on;Lot 1, Block 1, Wal- Mart in Fridley,''the:same being:8450�University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations ' 1. No garden sales shall occur in the parking lot �►s conducted in 1994. 2. The petitioner shall not be permitted to display products on the front sidewalk. 3. The petitioner shall create a storage area to the rear of the building for tr.ailer, pallet and baled cardboard � storage. The design of the storage area shall meet with City approval. , PLANNING COMMISSION ME$TING, OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGE 4 4. The landscaping and irrigation displaced by the above activities is to be relocated. IIPON A VOICE VOTS��ALL.VOTING.AYB,.CHAIRPERSON.NEWM�IN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED III�Il�iNIMOIIBLY. _ 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #94-15, BY LYNN PORATH OF TURNING POIATT ADULT DAY CARE INC.• Per Section 205.09.01.(3) of the Fridley City Code, to allow day care centers, on Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Moore Lake Highlands 4th Addition, generally located at 6180 Highway 65 N.E. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearinq notice and to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE,.ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON.NEWMAN DECI,ARED T8E MOTION CARRIED AND,THE PIIBLIC HEl�R1'NG OPEN AT 7:40 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is for a special use permit for an adult day care center at St. -Philip's Lutheran•Church,- The, seven-acre site is located in the southwest quadrant'of West Moore Lake Drive and: Highway.� 65 .'=: -.The.. property_:.is.-, zoned_. R-3., ..: < General Multiple Dwelling, =�and � there ' is : R-1, � -Single -�. Famiiy, �ta :: - :� the.. west and C-3 , General Shopping, }�.:to the . nort,h ., and .. eas�.�:; The code �requires �a'special:�use�ypezinit�-for�day:_care.`facil3ties`; T whether it is day care>� for :�adults > or children.° It :�.-is � appropriate�. .�:- as long as the facility is on the arterial transportation,route � and has the appropriate parking and other site conditions':" This is located on Highway 65 and fits the criteria for a special use permit. � Mr. Hickok stated�.the building was constructed in `1959f and;t , _ .� , expanded later. in 1964 .and.�again i;jin � 1965, °'' �; The �.building does.-,have _ .: a child . care area'.-which :�;:was .. esta)�lished ��in,_ 19f 2. :�t:.� that �� time, � a ��' special use permit.',was _not required.°'�for child , care�� activities ; and � the church has.. been:; successful �:with �this .'`activity :since that �E* � � y�`r time . - _ a �:_,� , , Mr. Hickok stated the.current�request.is for:an adult`day�care,.to be located in another part of;the`facility. The total square_. footage for the adult facility is approximately 6,000 square feet and the area for child care is smaller. The areas are separated . physically within the building. Both areas have supervision which will control the mixture of child activities and adult activities. //'1 Mr. Hickok stated staff has reviewed the site and has reviewed.� the potential impacts to be created by an adult facility within � the existing complex. There are 242 parking spaces with 10 F � ,�, PLANNIN�3 COMMI88ION MEETIN(3, OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGB 5 handicap spaces. Staff feels this is appropriate based on the activities within the church. Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends approval of the request with the following stipulation: _ 1. Any additional signage shall comply with the stipulations of the 1993 variance approval and the sign code. Mr. Hickok stated, in 1993, a variance was granted to allow 70 square feet for two years and would then revert back to the standard 40 square feet allowed for the church. At the end of that period, they could come forward and ask for another variance or revert back. That is the only issue staff sees with the site as proposed. The petitioner has indica�ed that the adult care facility may use a banner as an introduction to the use, but they would discuss other types of signage w�th the church and they understand they would have to comply with the sign code. Mr. Oquist asked if.this would be a five-day operation. Mr. Hickok stated yes. The hours are proposed to be 8:00 a.m.- 3:30 p.m., Monday.through Friday. This does not include weekends and holidays. Mr. Rondrick asked how many adults are expected to be at the. facility. �r, Mr. Hickok stated the capacity as set by the petitioner is 40 adults. Both the child care and adult care areas are required through the Department of Human Services to be licensed. The adult care area has applied and the State has indicated they will proceed with the license once 'they have approval from the City that this is appropriate for the,site. - Mr. Sielaff asked=.for..clarification:,.that�the church has a° variance for the�existing sign and.,this will revert back. Mr.-Hickok stated,this was correct.: There is a permanent sign in place for St. Philip's. In 1993,:.-they asked for a:variance to - add a temporary sign of painted plywood that has-additional information about the church and its services. It was with the understancling that this plywood sign would come down after two years and the church would seek a permanent solution with the allowable 40 square feet. Mr. Saba asked if a private party or the church will be running the center. Mr. Hickok stated a private for-profit organization that would be leasing the space. PI�ANNIN(3 CO1�II�lI88ION MEl3TING � OCTOBER 5. 19 9 4 PAaE 6 ,�� Ms. Porath stated the facility is for adult day care for anyone over 18 years of age including seniors. This is a new avenue for adults, seniors, and handicapped persons. There are a number of adult day care centers in the Twin Cities area. The facility most like this is the Salvation Army adult day care center_in Maplewood. Their clients would have a separate entrance from the child care area. Most clients arrive by Metro Mobility. They have asked for a maximum of 40 clients. Mr. Kondrick asked how many children are in the facility. Ms. Porath did not know. Their clients include anyone over 18 who fits as a vulnerable adult. They would take anyone that fits the regulations that the state would allow. All clients cdme voluntarily. The center will have a rehab segment. They want people to stay independent and in their homes. Ms. Modig asked if the facility will have accommodations for those people who need drop-off services: Ms. Porath stated the state does not allow a drop-off center but they would like to do that. The clients must have.a physician's approval to come to the center. �� Mr: Newman asked'for background�on the experience of the - corporation. � � - Ms. Porath�statecl-.the personnel are�.all medical�personnel with rehab and geriatric backgrounds. All staff have nursing backgrounds. � Mr. Saba asked the maximum number af clients they would have. ` Ms. Porath stated_they:have`asked for 40 in that space:` They must:have approximately;40::square�.:feet�per person so they could � " have� �more,"' but�- tliey -.would: Tike ..to:�: have •:40. : There will be one staff person for:every.five.�individuals for those individuals, for example,_who would_not;know,,what;-,to do;in case.of fire or do - ' not: have `the skilTs to get : out �;of ,�::the �:way. Otherwise, the state � xequires one staff person:for�;every�eight individuals. They have � eight staff now.for 40 clients.`" Mr. Newman asked if 40 was set by the license. Ms. Porath stated they have asked for 40 clients. The state allows more and we can increase that number through re-licensing. Mr. Newman asked.if they would need to come back for another special use permit if they increased the number of clients. Mr. Hickok stated they would not need to come back. r"� ,-� PLANNINai COI�lI88ION MEETING. OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGI; 7 Ms. Modig asked, under the square footage, what is the maximum number of clients. Ms. Porath stated they have skilled people for 40 and that is all they would every want to take. - Ms. Modig expressed concern that this could change in the future. Mr. Hickok stated the Commission can add a stipulation that the special use permit be reviewed at the time they would go to the state for more than 40 clients. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICL VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPLRSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARIN(� CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M. Mr. Saba stated he had no problem with-�-the request except to recommend a review period. Mr. Kondrick asked if this would be a general review or a review when the numbers change. ��` Mr. Saba stated both. Tlzis is new� in terms of -use of that-: ° facility. It sounds like this�is a good use of the facility, but _ we wants to make sure that`we are getting into::something'.that:;we are not aware. He would.recommend-reviewing in one year:to one - and a half years. Mr. Newman stated his concern is that they have met the requirements of the special use permit and state requirements. As long as they are not in violation of state requi�ementst he was not sure that the City could xeview anyway:. `k = Ms . Modig stated -�the . City: � cannot° review if they are in compliance '�'�° and doing what. they have aske c�'-to.: do. Mr. Saba stated he is concerned about.the level of illness or disability of the people under care. � - Ms. Modig stated this is similar to a halfway facil�ty. The personnel are nurses and licensed. She did not see how we can regulate or look at. She�is concerned about the numbers and personnel. The state dictates one staff for 5 clients. If we allow a special use permit, then we must rely on the state to police. She did not know that the City�could. Mr. Newman agreed with the concern. He suspects the best avenue �� is through the state. PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETINa. OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAaE 8 � Mr. Kondrick recommended adding a stipulation that would refer to the number of clients that occupy the space in the facility. Nlr. Oquist agreed that, when going back to.re-license for additional people, it should be controlled by the state. _ Ms. Modig stated she had no problem with the request other than the number of patients. She would like to have feedback on numbers in the future or when they go back for re-licensing for additional clients. Mr. Kondrick asked, with the rules we have, can they have more people there or is 40 the maximum number. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner indicated they need 40 square feet per person including staff. They will utilize 6,000 square feet. The state would look at and say they can have x number of people. As Mr. Hickok indicated,_ a stip�lat�on could be included� that says once they re-iicense for over:40, they need to come back to the City who.must re-issue a special use permit to increase the number. Mr. Hickok stated the Commission's recommendation and Council approval indicates_the zoning is.appropriate and they. have been ,� � given a special use permit. :What°would�trigger:that�is if we say :- that number changes, then we.call it back for-review. Y quist, . secon , , . � - �, ,, ., MOTION b Mr. O ded.by Mr..Kondrick,:to.approve � Special Use Permit, SP #94-15, by Lynn Porath of Turning Point Adult Day Care, Inc., to allow day care centers, on Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Moore Lake Highlands 4th Addition, generally located at 6180 Highway 65 N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Any additional signage shall comply with the stipu�ations-of.::° � the 1993 variance approval and:the sign:code: - � 2. At which time.the.:applicant makes license application to the __ State to serve more than 40 clients, the-Special.,Use:Permit -: . shall be subject �o review by the City. � -��;��' IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYB� CBAIRpEggON NEWMAN DECLARED° ' THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOIIBLY. � Ms. McPherson stated this item would be reviewed by the City Council at their meeting of October 17. 3. CONSIDERATION OF RE-USE OF THE 10 000 AUTO PARTS BUILDING BY THE GYM,. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6525 IINIVERSITY AVENUE N E. Ms. Dacy stated the request is a two part request. The firSt is �``� to occupy a building located in an S-2 Redevelopment District on ,'� PLANNINa CO1MII�3ISSION MEETINd, OCTOBBR 5. 1994 __ PAGE 9 a temporary basis. The second is to determine the City's position to include this use in the approved redevelopment plan. Ms. Dacy stated the intent of the S-2 district gives-broad discretion to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)- and the City and also sets up a process to make that determination. Ms. Dacy stated the subject parcel is located on the northeast corner of Mississippi and IIniversity. Four years ago, the City Council approved rezoning to S-2 with stipulations for a developer to construct a retail strip mall. The 25,000 square foot mall had 144 parking spaces proposed. The original developer did not pursue the plan. The current developer does have optian agreements on the two single family homes adjacent to the east and a verbal agreement with the owner of the building on the subject parcel. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner, Mr. Jim Yungner, is the owaier of The Gym, which is a personal training.center. Mr. Yungner wants to move his operation from 261 Commerce Circle to this location for a period of up to three years. As part of tlie request to move his business, the:petitioner has indicated he is going to make approximately $30,000-$40,000 worth of investment in carpet, -`'~�, rest rooms, :locker. rooms, .�etc.�_..He . also.. wants_ to paint the outside -of the � building� `arid�' put>: a° sign � on. the'� front of ° t11e' - building. � . ^ ., _ > : : . . � / �'.. . . . . � 1 :`, Ms . Dacy stated the survey- froin ��1965. was: included with�. the . agenda, The building is about 14,000 square feet and shows approximately 89 parking spaces. The parking lot would need to be re-striped, the pavement repaired, and weeds cut. Ms. Dacy stated the<..first request;is to consider tempor,ary occupancy of the building. --.Staff�have been working wiih the ..owner on the type of. uses occurr,ing,;>within the building.� _.�This is the first tenant:that�wants�r�to pursue a_,longer:term occupancy. Because of the�.-three-yeare:-plan.�,andf.:our. redevelopment goals, staff has brought this to your- attention. ..� .:The: nature : of -.the . use is _ compatible with'the'neigi�liorhood:,� This.use takes place`inside. The peak hours'`are when'-clients:use;�the site°usually after - working hours. The impact is not°as intrusive as other uses. Ms. Dacy stated the second request is whether the use is consistent with the long term redevelopment plan. Because the nature of the use is not a typical retail use, the use is quite compatible and less intrusive.. On the other hand, the petitioner wants to make this location permanent beyond three years. We are in the middle of the southwest quadrant redevelopment. The � market may dictate new interest in retail shops. There may be �� new opportunities the City may want to evaluate. The�purpose of this part of the request is.to provide an opportunity for the HRA PLANNINQ COMMI88ION MEETING. OCTOHER 5. 1994 PAQE 10 and Council to provide feedback to the petitioner as to whether this would be a good use on the property. . Ms. Dacy stated there may be a parking issue depending on the amount of space they are going to occupy. Having a smaller area of the building may work. If they use up to half of the building, they may need more parking. It depends on the balance of uses: On one hand, it is a good use because it is internal and it is compatible. On the other hand, we don�t know what the market would produce if we are successful on the opposite corner. Ms. Dacy stated staff recommends.approval on a temporary basis would be appropriate. It would improve the appearance of the building and would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends the following stipulations: l. The petitioner shall apply for the appropriate building, plumbing, and mechanical permits to complete remodeling as proposed. ,._;, � 2. The petitioner shall stripe the parking lot; parking stalls are l0.feet wide and 20 feet long, or l8 feet long if the staff abuts a curb stop or landscaped area. 3. The dumpster shall be screened.on:all:sides.. _ 4 . The parking . lot; .shall ; be kepte free ��: of ; weeds .�`and' ' grass . �� , � ` . �; 5. Landscaped area to the no=th shall be kept trimmed�in an attractive manner to provide screening from the residences to the north._ � ,''1 6. Inclusion of the proposed,use.in:the Fridley-Town;Square., redevelopment project'shall�be`reviewed by��the City Council � and Housing and -Redevelopment .�Authority prior to�: execution/ ,,,. �°� approval -of _the::development::'contract for:.the" project." r�.' � �.�� Mr. Newman asked, if they can took action�on:the;;;first.;request: and not the second, could the'petitioner take°occupancy.,�;: �� - Ms. Dacy stated yes. The intent of the second request is because ' the use was not intended. If there are strong feelings against_- the request, we should let the petitioner knaw now. Mr. Newman stated stipulation #6 he suspects the Commission may have concerns that this use would rest of the uses in relationship to parking. Is to come back to the Planning Commission as well Council? Planning work with the it appropriate as the HRA and- ,� ,.-� PLANNING COI�iI88ION MEETING. OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGE 11 , . Ms. Dacy stated yes, the Planning Commission should be looking at parking issues. Mr. Newman stated there was an access road to the north to 68th. Under this proposal, is that access road still there. _ Ms. Dacy stated the pavement is still there but it is blocked by concrete bumpers. She felt those should be kept in place. Mr. Yungner stated this gives them three years to see if the use is appropriate. Mr. Newman asked if he was comfortable that the Commission not take action until we see where the redevelopment plan in going. Mr. Yungner stated yes. Mr. Kondrick asked the hours of operation for the business. Mr. Yungner stated their hours are 5:00 a.m. to midnight during the week and 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekends. Mr. Saba asked if there were any problems with parking where they � are now. Mr. Yungner stated they had none. ::�� , Ms. Modig stated the plans were to repaint the exterior�on three sides. Why not the east side? Mr. Yungner stated that side will not be seen. He is trying to go in without spending a lot. Their clientele are different from the other health clubs in the area. � .� Mr. Kondrick asked if Mr. Yungner had read the stipulations. Mr. Yungner stated he understood the stipulations and had no problems with them. � Mr. Newman asked Ms. Dacy if we run the risk of incurring relocation expenses if we discontinue this use in the final proj ect . Ms. Dacy stated there are some financial issues. One issue is that whoever steps in to the redevelopment, and if they want to pursue this in one year, would have to deal with the gym and the lease. Another issue is the amount of improvements being put into the building. Although it is not significant, there could be an acquisition impact�. Based on what is being proposed, she -''� did not think it would be significant. PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. OCTOBSR 5, 1994 PAa$ 12 Mr. Newman asked if this request would go to the HIZA. Ms. Dacy stated yes. Mr. Newman stated he thought this would be better than a vacant building. Mr. Kondrick stated he knew there were not a lot of cars at the business at any one time. What does he expect in terms of traffic at peak times.? Mr. Yungner stated at 5:00 a.m.-6:30 a.m. there are 15-30 cars. Throughout the day, they have from 10-35 cars. In the evening, they have 30-55 cars and less after 9:00 p.m. Mr. Kondrick stated he had no problem with the request. It is a good business and a quiet business. MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr-:�-Oquist, to recommend • approval of occupancy of the building at 6525 University Avenue N.E. for The Gym on a temporary basis subject ta the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner:shall,apply.for.the appropriate building, plumbing;<andn'mechanical�permi.ts to complete remodeling as proposed... T _ � �,,. . 2. The-petitioner shall stripe the parking lot;�-parking:�stalls are 10 feet wide and 20 feet long, or 18 feet long if the stall abuts a curb stop or landscaped area. 3. 4: 5. 6. The dumpster shall be screened on all sides. The parking lot shall beu;:,kept' °.free of weeds and grass. -. � _ - Landscaped area.to'the�;north;`shall'be'`kept trimmed in an -. attractive_:manner�to.�:provide-screening from the residences to the.north: "� �` � � . - __,,,�..: Inclusion of the°proposed use�in the Fridley Town Square redevelopment;project-shall be reviewed by the City Council, Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Planning Comnission prior to execution/ approval of the development contract for the project. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTIN�3 AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRITsD UNANIMOIISLY. � Ms. Dacy stated this item would be reviewed by the City Council� at their meeting of October 17. � PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, OCTOB�R 5, 1994 PAGE 13 4� �F'.C_F.TVF. mr� turl�ES OF THE HUMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 0�.+�[ TION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the Human Resources Commission minutes of September 8, 1994. _ DPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIISLY. 5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the Housing Redevelopment Authority minutes of September 6, 1994. IIPON A VAICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRILD IINANIMOIISLY. � 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS &•-RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 12. 1994 MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of September 12, 1994. ,�, � IIPON A VOICE VOTS� ALL'VOTIN(� AYE, CHAIRPERB�N NLWMAN DECLARED `. THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBI,Y. . � : 7. Continue Review of Design Guidelines:for Southwest'�Quadrant Mr. Gair stated it is the responsibility of this commission to facilitate redevelopment by forming a set of guidelines and not to get pre-occupied with a specific plan or specific architecture. This is a complex and difficult unde�talting, He suggested members view the plans being presented as if� they were� ar� owner/occupant of one of these homes. <:Ms. O'Connell will make -. a presentation for the:site:plan.: It is."important to:focus on :��. features such as open:space, orientation, buffering spaces, etc. Prior to the meeting, he went to the property to see.,it.at niqht. > He looked in all directions, listened to traffic, and'.imagined the area with homes. Although the Co�ission may not have`the - same feelings, he asked they try to keep daytime and nighttime visual and sound in mind to make the most habitable environment. Ms. O'Connell stated, at the last meeting, the favorable comments were with Plans B and C and those are the plans that have been developed. At the last meeting, they did not have available the site improvement along M�ississippi. The site is therefore smaller. They met with, staff and set guidelines for 3rd Street as a through street. There is a 60-foot right-of-way and a 60 � �� degree curv�. They have also added a detention pond. The Commission indicated they liked using 3rd Street as a transition. PLANNING COMMIBBION MEETING OCTOBER 5 1994 PAGE 14 � The density has been reduced using the recommendation of 1/3 single level and 2/3 multi level. Ms. O�Connell_presented two plans - B which is organized around a pedestrian use, and C which is organized around village gr�ens. The difference_in housing is that C has a row house style that faces a village green. The green is 62 feet across and the backs of the units are 40 feet-45 feet apart. B has car entry ports. Where the units face each other is closer and the back yards have 65 feet between units. B has the view directed to the rear. An open space dissects the site and breaks it down into spaces. Pedestrians travel along the sides of the homes for the most part and connects with future and existing trails within the city. C focuses on open space which is the village green and is something people view and walk around. There is less open space in the back. Pedestrians travelling within the site have a different experience. On B, the meeting is by chance on the trails. The homes do not have direct views onto the trail. Plan C has a pedestrian and auto mix which is a more�-formal experience. Pedestrians walk along the houses and around the green. Plan C has a frontage road that intersects with 3rd Street, travels along Mississippi and connects with Satellite. In addition, � there.are one-way loops that define the individual neighborhoods. ^ �° Plan B<also has:a road that runs into 3rd and.traffic joins:that - road or opens directly onto third. � � �. �� , _ ,, � ;>, � Ms. O'Connell reviewed cross section drawings of_both.plans. Plan C would have a five foot boulevard next to Mississippi, a five foot sidewalk, and then a small berm with plantings. Access to the garages would be from the frontage road. The back yards for these units open onto the village green. On University, the existing service-road is kept with perhaps small plantings between University``and the service road. Single�level��units would�open onto tiie frontage road. Density of this plan is 80. Ms.�O'Connell.,stated�:Plan B has similar space along Mississippi but there is more space $long University Avenue with a berm and � vegetation: Density of Plan B is 76. Mr. Hargans stated they have.done a development where the street does not need to be.one-way around the village green. Part of the thinking for the garages facing out is to act as a buffer. The intent is to blunt the severe effect with the garage. It can be enhanced with other features to soften. Along Mississippi, the units have the parking below and it is the closed side of the building. Mr. Saba asked if they were planning to.put in mature trees. � Ms. O'Connell stated that depends on the cost. Typical planting � PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, OCTOBBR 5. 1994 PAG$ 15 size is 2.5 to 3 inches which 'transplants well. The bigger the tree, the more costly. Mr. Saba asked if they would be using a mix of deciduous and evergreens. - Ms. O'Connell stated there would be both. Evergreens go well for screening. Mr. Newman asked if, in Plan C, there was enough room along University for mature trees. Ms. O�Connell stated this does not need a lot of greenery. The front of the unit is the entrance and the view is to the rear. Plan.B has a different effect. There can be a combination. Mr. Kondrick stated the garages may act as a sound barrier, but in terms of marketability, he is worried about the noise from University compared to greenery on the_�other plan. Mr. Hargans stated the space does not help with sound. It is more of a visual thing as far as sound. If you cannot see, the sense is that is screened. �^�, Mr. Rondrick sta�ed,.in terms of-market, would the units:facing University on Plan B be as marketable as those facing IIniversity of Plan C. . - , _ � :;- �� Mr. Hargans stated one may have a hard time saying B i:s your space. Mr. Newman stated Plan C shows a sidewalk system. Ms. O�Connell stated there is a connection.that leads�out to the bus stop. � . Ms. O'Connell stated P1an B along Mississippi has a 5 foot boulevard, 5 foot sidewalk,-and then a berm-that is 6 feet high and about 40 feet in depth. This allows more plantings: The sides of the units would face the street.- Cars'�and pedestrians would not be seen. On University, there is the combination of 9- foot berm and backyard open space before the single level units. There would 90 feet of open sQace between the backs of the units with the pedestrian trail. Mr. Kondrick stated this plan with the 9-foot berm seems as if it would be a more effectiv� sound barrier. Mr. Newman asked if they had considered snow storage on these �"� plans . PLANNING COMMISSI�N MEETING, OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGS 16 ,� Ms. O�Connell stated she thought there was opportunity along.the lots for snow storage. Plan B would probably require snow to be moved out of the roadways. Plan C would have space on the village greens. There may be a problem on the frontage road. Asr. Oquist asked if the City would maintain the roadway. Ms. Dacy stated the City would maintain 3rd Street. The roadways in the complex would be private. Mr. Oquist asked, on Plan B, if there is an issue from an emergency standpoint with the walkway. Ms. O'Connell stated 150 feet maximum feet is the guideline. If there is a concern, a 16-foot width could be kept free of trees. Mr. Newman stated he has concerns about someone getting lost and needing a place to turn around. On Plan B, can an effective job be done with signs. „ Mr. Gair stated he thought there would be mailboxes or identifying monuments at.the primary roads. Mr. Newman stated it would be good to do that to reduce the ,� number of people entering errantly. Mr.� Gair stated�3rd Street will bs a through street: Ariother concern is visitors. He didn't think there would be.a problem in either of these two cases. Both are fairly regular in pattern. Once they enter a drive, it will become appar.ent there are six units per side. Mr. Rondrick stated they like to entertain which would mean extra vehicles. In these plans, where would there be room for eight to ten additional cars. Mr. Gair stated the road is 24 feet in width. One could par.k along one side._:They can also-provide.space per unit for.guest parking. Other communities provide parking allowed for every . unit which would be two interior spaces and four exterior-spaces, and 0.5 spaces per unit for guests. It works well to provide for on site but he would not construct this until the need is determined. Unfortunately for home owners association, they will need to regulate and monitor. He would strongly encourage the City to plan for 0.5 per unit but not�build it right away. Mr. Kondrick asked if a future buyer would see this at the time. of purchase. Ms. O'Connell stated there are opportunities to provide parking ^ which are not shown here. !-� � /"� PLANNINa COMMIBSION ME$TING, OCTOBER 5. 1994 P�GE 17 Mr. Carlson stated each unit has two indoor spaces and two outdoor spaces. Guest.s can also parallel park on Plan C along the village greens. � Mr. Gair stated another option is to handle overflow parki�g on 3rd Street. The City of Plymouth has regulated that spaces in front of garages cannot be counted. There becomes much parking in that case. Mr. Rondrick asked if people are attracted to that going in. Mr. Newman stated he-thought most people that do that will not live in townhomes. Ms. O�Connell stated staff had requested that they also look at a 40-unit age regulated condo. As previous discussed, this would be 3-4 stories in height. Mr. Hargans stated this is something tv�-think about because there are concerns about row houses and density. Putting in such a unit frees up the rest of the site. It can be placed in the corner of Mississippi and IIniversity and the elevator could be used for a future covered crossing. Mr•. Carlson stated 40 units could fit�tightly-.into the corner next to the,frontage road. . ;�_ . Mr. Oquist asked�where the City was with:the apartment buildings. Ms. Dacy stated this would be discussed on October 24. Mr. Oquist stated one consideration might be to acquire the apartment.buildings, remodeling and this could become:the senior area and could'act as;:the buffer.to the�other neighborhood. Mr. Newman stated ` Plan �°C has'-� more units `tYian ' Plan B. If ' the units to the west be� taken� out;. .the---rest could be adjusted to the west in order to address the'concerns;about University. _ Mr. Saba stated he liked Plan 8.<�It--has a residential effect, the walkway separation, and separation from the neighborhood. He liked the general layout. It seems more like�a neighborhood. Plan C has some nice elements but it has too much of a project look. He liked the village greens and the one way streets. He liked the idea of the apartment access to a crosswalk over University. He would like to see better access to that elevator. Overall he would choose P1an�B. It is more of a neighborhood than a development. Plan C seems more rigid. If a senior plan is included, he would prefer to see it where the apartments are now. On these two plans, he likes the idea of a pedestrian cross walk. If the building must be put in, the corner is okay but he PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINa. OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGE 18 would prefer not to have it. Mr. Oquist stated he did not see the need for senior housing unless it is where the apartments are now. He liked Plan B. It gives the feel of a lot of green space and a 16t of open area. His son lived in a community in Denver which had the walkway concept which was very nice. Plan C is too geometric and too neat. He liked the village greens and the mall effect but there is also some of that on the other plan. B has better buffering. He would like to see something done with the apartments. There needs to be a buffer to the rest of community. As long as they are going this far, he would green up also. Mr. Kondrick asked if there could be more places for water in the complex such as ponds in the larger open areas. Ms. O'Connell stated this may be a problem. With water, there become requirements with the level of the homes in relation to the water level. ,_ Mr. Kondrick stated he preferred Plan B. He liked the topography with the berms, open spaces, and the number of trees. The exterior can be changed and can have a tremendous impact. He likes the green areas, the walking�path,..and the driveways. There is a parking problem on both plans. He would prefer_to:see-� the apartments gone. If we have to live with them and cannot. make them into senior housing, he would be in favor of the�':40 unit building in P1an B. He thought a_senior area where:.the- apartments are would be a good location. Ms. Modig stated she liked Plan 8 with its green spaces. She is concerned about parking and accessibility for emergency vehicles. She liked the berming and thought it would protect the residents from the noise from University and Mississippi and woul�d be more attractive. With Plan C, she_has:.a problem with the University, side because she would not_want:to�.look at garages. P1an B has, even though all are row houses,..doesn't look so much so.. She would like to see a senior building. She would like to see the-: apartments gone. She does not want to see them remodeled.�- She.°; didn't think this would produce a quality area. She would prefer - to see a new building with a combination of rental and condos. She would like to see something on the corner with accessibility to rapid transit. If using an elevator, it could be accessible to those also living in the community. She would also like to see more water, but it is not a big thing. Mr. Kondrick asked if eliminating the apartments would cause any design difficulties with either plan. Ms. O'Connell stated no. This area could fit well into either design. � /'1 i'1 ;:. �", PLANNINa COI�IIBBION MEETINa. OCTOBER 5, 1994 PAG$ 19 Mr. Sielaff stated he has a bias for green spaces and minimal hard surface so he prefers Plan B. Personally, he didn't think this was a place for a highrise. It would be out of scale to what this would be. If there needs to be senior housing, in need to be in scale with what is in the development. There �s a problem with snow removal and snow storage. Mr. Newman stated he likes on Plan B the set backs from the roadways, the screening, the berms, and the walkway. The car courts create a claustrophic effect. There seems to be more hard surface area. He likes the village greens on C. Depending on the architecture, they could_duplicate that on B. He has seen complexes such as B elsewhere. Plan C is distinctive and set off from other communities. From the standpoint of parking, snow removal and getting lost, the traffic flow is easier on C. Mr. Kondrick stated it was of interest that people would be walking around that area. If going by the drawings, it does not indicate that. Most garages have acces� off the drive. The fronts of the houses will face the green areas and will not have a promenade. Mr. Newman stated, if in fact the village greens are on the '�'�� garage side and�will not be seen by the residents living there, it makes more sense to go with-B where the focus is on the green space. He thought the units would have a tuck-under garage and living above and have green space on both sides. B has'green space only on the back and not in the front. Concerning the highrise, his first reaction is that they have done a great job of coming up with an overall design but he would want to see an overall layout first. The southeast corner seemed more appropriate and set off from the rest. He does not feel strongly about senior housing. Single level living appeals to empty nesters. Economics may dictate that. Mr.. Saba stated it does not make sense to mess up the development for density. Mr. Newman stated senior housing may create the economies for the green spaces in that area. He thought it would be needed if the apartments are taken out. Mr. Hargans stated the architects have been working closely with the site planners which is the first part of this project. Now we are getting into the architecture. He would like reaction based on those things the Commission wants to see. For guidelines, we need to come to the best option and include those aspects that you like the best. Handling water on the site is an ^ issue. The roof forms must respond handle water. The sense of identity is also a consideration. How much do you want to accentuate the individual unit? There is a piece that talks PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1994 PAG$ 20 about accessories. Another issue is green space and also usable green space. How much is�usable? Green space will be used for. buffers. We must also think about land use. Mr. Hargans presented a variety of forms from simple to more complex. This can be the extent to which to suggest a style. What kind of character do you want the area to have? In Fridley, most of the housing has low roofs, broad overhangs and a horizontal type of facade. Two-thirds of the units are two- story. How are you going to get that effect with a two-story unit? The designs start as very simple to more complicated design. As the design gets more.complicated, it also gets more expensive. Sometimes the details can add a touch of character and they will price these at a certain point in the process in order to know the costs. The colonial revival style has a few more details. Again, the same style can be enhanced with dormers, bays, etc. There is quite a height to the units. There are also some developments that have rooftop terraces as extra space on a small site. This is also gcting in next to other flat roofed buildings. Again, the designs can range from simple to more complicated. Mr. Saba asked how feasible a flat roof is for snow in the winter time. � Mr. Hargans felt the flat roof would have no groblems._� . ,:. � Mr. Newman stated he had built some.of those.:home.and:have had some problems with the flat roofs. But, most commercial buildings have flat roofs and they work. Mr. Hargans stated they needed to know what elements need to be included.. He asked for comments regarding roof design.; .. �., , Mr. Kondrick stated he thought people in this area would prefer at;; colonial design.: He likes the:-idea::of a look such as=Georgetown Apartments because each unit.is unique. He liked the idea-of a rooftop terrace. Mr. Oquist stated he had reservations about it. trendy thing. It is nice the first summer. The would not be used as much. The third year, it is deal and he thought the appeal would go away. It looks like a � .. second sun�er it not as big of Mr. Sielaff stated he did not like the flat roof because it gives the feel of an urban environment. He wants to emphasize green space and this does not go with green space. Mr. Hargans stated he thought this type of building could hold its own on a corner with other flat roof buildings in the area. The area has to be transitional. This must be part of the urban '-� /'\ /��l pLANNING COMMI88ION MSETING, OCTOBER 5. 1994 PAGE 21 fabric and still work as housing. Is it going to detract by being traditional? This is a busy intersection. Mr. Kondrick stated a rooftop terrace has walls that can be decorated and/or landscaped. The owners can plant trees. �t is like another space that is their own that others do not know is there. Mr. Oquist stated, if you create another space on the roof with depth, it then becomes 3 1/2 stories. He is concerned about the height. We want to create something to bring the height down with the appearance. Mr. Newman stated the terrace creates a private space. Mr. Carlson stated the flat roof buildings would have a lower profile. The other units are higher by the height of the roof. Ms. Modig stated she liked the rooftop-terrace because if provides more green space. She is concerned that with a flat roof the view of the Holly Center and the roofs of the houses around it will not be an attractive view. They would not be able to see the Mississippi River. Mr. Kondrick asked, in terms of cost, is a porch more expensive to create. Mr. Hargans stated the cost is about the same. It is hard to equate. You must decide how many of those pieces you can afford. Mr. Oquist agreed that one would not be able to see the river from this location. The river is down and there are buildings between this area and the river. .. , Mr. Sielaff stated a flat roof is a straight line. There is nothing more unnatural than a straight line. Mr. Carlson asked for comments about the garages. All have the garages under. It is more expensive to have the garage on the side. It is more attractive to have the garage�at ground level. Mr. Oquist stated he would �refer to see the garages along side to bring the height down but he was not sure if this could be done and keep the density. Mr. Hargans stated, with this density, by getting above there is also a public space to look at. This brings up a good point about the height. The area may need a mixture. !� Mr. Oquist stated the garages and entries are syminetrical. The garages are on the �left and the entry on the right. He PLANNING COMMI88ION MEBTING, OCTOBER 5, 1994 PAGE 22 � recommended alternating the design to break it up. Mr. Newman stated he likes the garages with individual doors. He also preferred the.garage openings with the angled corners. Ms. Modig stated, with the garages on the lower level, the floors are colder in the upstairs unless there is good insulation. Mr. Saba stated he also likes the individual doors with the angles. Mr. Carlson asked for comments about the materials. Mr. Saba stated they had talked at the last meeting about some kind of entry. If we could come up with something appealing, we continue that theme with the housing. Mr. Hargans stated this is a good idea and they have talked about requesting a developer to have that as-�art of the system, but he thought they should bring that next time. Mr. Kondrick felt the more brick there is, the more others will like it. Brick means stability, warmth, class, etc. . . .. ^ Mr. Hargans stated�brick also corresponds to the brick on the other buildings in the area. . ;��; Mr. Newman thought-the materials used would.depend on the'style of architecture. Ms. Dacy asked, regarding the gauge of the aluminum siding, should this be an issue that we should give direction to the developer. , Mr. Newman stated the siding should not be vinyl whether or not seamless is used.- A lot of-:people don't like steel or aluminum siding. In 15 years; they want it to look sharp. Again, that depends on the architecture-and, in some styles,. it may not be appropriate. _ Mr. oquist asked if brick would have a tendency to make these look massive. It is a harder look. You also cannot change the color. Periodically, owners may want to change the color and appearance of the community. Brick cannot be changed. Mr. Newman stated he did not know that stucco would fit either. Mr. Hargans stated stucco now comes in colors and costs are similar to brick. The homeowners association usually has rules about painting and color. You can push a specific range or �"�� perfonaance level. He did not know how much individuality can be PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBSR 5. 1994 PAGB 23 allowed. Mr. Newman stated the siding needs to be a durable material. The type depends on the architecture. Mr. Kondrick stated he would like to see some brick in the design. He also liked the concept of making the units look individual. Mr. Newman stated they could do this using different shades of brick. Mr. Sielaff stated he would prefer to see natural materials whether cedar or brick. Mr. Hargans asked if the Commission saw this as a departure from the current Fridley homes. The Commission�consensus was that this-•-should be different, unique and desirable. Mr. Saba stated, because of the location, this needs something that will draw people into that area. ^ Mr. Newman stated, in looking at history, the feeling is that we want a signature development. He is comfortable doing so here. Mr. Kondrick stated the location is good. It has access to I- 694, downtown, close to shopping, and something should be built that would merit that location. Mr. Hargans stated signature needs to be reflected strongly in one or more ways. He is also hearing to concentrate on developing pieces that respond to these guidelines, and they can put some costs to them., Ms. O'Connell asked if there was a style of architecture that lends itself to taking a basic rectangle and attaching a piece here and there. Even though each unit is the same, you could add a bay or add some brick. Mr. Hargans stated he thought they could take the comments and sketch a style that could be an example of what you feel is appropriate. Mr. Newman stated he liked the different roof lines and the bay windows. They need a deck or something for people to get outside. He liked the roof lines broken up. He did not like the rooftop terrace design or double garage doors. I� Mr. Kondrick stated he liked the colonial revival design. He did PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. OCTOBSR 5. 1994 PAGE 24 � not like all those garage doors. He would like two larger doors and would like that plan with the flat roof. Mr. Oquist stated he preferred the colonial revival design. He likes the low profile design. He cannot imagine windows coming out. He would like to see the entries staggered and the garage openings at an angle. He did not like the flat roof. The roof adds to the height but he did not know what else they could do. Mr. Saba stated he also liked the colonial revival. The garages could be dressed up. He liked the idea of decorating the front windows. There is a lot that could be done with that. Ms. Modig stated she liked the idea of a rooftop terrace. She liked the colonial revival at the high end. One could have a rooftop space and bay windows give a feeling of air and space. She liked the garage doors but alternating them with the entries so they are not so uniform. She does not like the idea of having different materials and colors. She did not think that was classy. Mr. Sielaff stated he preferred natural. Anything that enhances that feeling he would like to see. The colonial revival with natural�materials and a feeling of open space would enhance that ^ type of feeling. It should be something unique. ' " Mr. Oquist stated he wondered the kind of people that would be buying these units. Are they contemporary people? Are they looking for one style over another? Would they like more modern as far as a selling point? We have to take into consideration a style that is long lasting. A style may be trendy today, but it may not be what is selling in 10 years. He likes the idea that once we settle on a style, we can then settle on a mate,rial. Ms. Modig stated she found, when selling townhouses and condos, owners did not want to worry about outside maintenance. As long as the floor plans are workable and the outside maintenance is not a problem, they look at those things. They also ask about the level of noise and how thick are the walls. �The noise level is a big thing. Privacy is also important. They want the outside to be attractive as long as they don't have to care of it. Ms. Dacy stated, from this meetings, she would summarize the comments and bring them to the HRA and City Council. Mr. Newman stated, on behalf of the Planning Commission, he would like to complement everyone. This has been fun. We must be very careful that the developer needs to have flexibility in what they � • , �_ c /�'\ �� /'`� PLANNING CO1rIIrII88ION MEETING, OCTOHER 5, 1994 PAGE 25 are going to do. They know the market. This Commission has given guidelines and has provided input. Staff will now talk to the developer to see what they can do and what we can afford. The final plan may be much different, but it hopefully will incorporate our ideas. _ Mr. Kondrick asked if the Planning Commission would have input into the covenants or restrictions on the property. Ms. Dacy stated that will be part of the review process when we know who will be developing the property. Staff will be meeting with the consultants. If we need to come back at the next meeting to confirm, they will do so. Mr. Newman stated there is a divergence of opinion and they will need to pick out what works. We need to provide direction and it is now staff's task to pull out from out input. He asked, if staff are going to bring this back, to bring it back in Oetober. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICE VOTTs, ALL VOTIN(3 AYE, CSAIRPERBON NEWMA1d DECLARED. THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE OCTOBER 5, 1994, PLANNING C0�3ISSION MEETIN(3 ADJOIIRNED AT 10:38 P.M. �'t' Respectfully submitted, ��/ Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary �� S I G N— IN S H E E T PLANNING COMMISSIpN.MEETING, � Wednesday, October 5, 1994 : � � %`� . , � � STAFF REPORT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Commission Date : October 19, 1994 City Council Date . APPLICATION NIIMBER Lot Split request, L.S. #94-06 Special Use Permit request, SP #94-16 PETITIONER David Stewart, petitioner; owner of Moore Lake Apartments - City of Fridley, owner; 5720 Polk Street N.E. LOCATION 5720 Polk Street N.E.; north of Moore Lake Apartments, on the west side of Polk Street. The subject parcel is zoned R-1, " Single Family Dwelling. REOIIEST The request includes two related, yet Separate, issues for � consideration: , : `�,�,:r:: , ; 1. A lot split to divide Lot 3, Block 2, Sexter Addition into two parcels. 2. A special use permit in accordance with Section 205.07.O1.C.(7), to allow automobile parking in an R-1, � Single Family Dwelling district for adjacent�-uses. ROiJND � - The City acquired 5720 Polk Street N.E. as part of the Polk Street reconstruction project in 1992. Po1k Street's designat3.on as a Minnesota State Aid Street required its reconstruction to: . �eet certain standards. This required the City to acquire additional right-of-way which then adversely impacted the subject parcel due to the location of the original dwelling on the parcel. The City purchased the site with the dwelling, demolished the original dwelling, and reconstructed Polk Street.. The City intends that at least.a portion of the lot be placed on the market for construction of a new single family dwelling at the proper setbacks. � . � Staff Report L.S. #94-06 and SP #94-16 David Stewart Page 2 ANALYSIB The lot, minus the right-of-way for the reconstruction, totals 16,500 square feet. The City is proposing to convey 5,705 square feet to the petitioner for a Moore Lake Apartment parking lot expansion, subject to variance, special use permit, and lot split approvals. There are 70 existing parking spaces on the Moore Lake Apartment property. At the time the structure were built, 64 parking spaces were required. Current code requirements indicate 109 spaces would be necessary for a complex of this size. Originally, staff and the property owner discussed many alternatives; one of which was to have the apartment owner approach all property owners north of the apartment complex and purchase 35 feet of land from the southern edge of each property. Union 76 owns much of the property to the north. Robert and Gloria Gilstad own the remaining portion (other than the City's � lot on Polk Street). Neither Union 76 or the Gilstads were interested in selling their property. � The Gilstad's will provide an easement�to allow.snow storage.on their property. The petitioner agreed to assist the Giistad's in their effort to rezone their property to residential, if the Gilstads granted an easement for snow storage. The Gilstad's also requested a privacy fence behind (north of) the easement to allow screening from the parking area. Lot S�lit To the south of the City's parcel (5720 Polk Street N.E.) are the Moore Lake Apartments. This apartment complex has experienced a number of parkinq problems in recent years. Ap.artment tenants utilize Lynde Drive as their overflow parking area. There are four "no parking�' signs located on portions of Lynde Drive. These signs were placed on Lynde Drive for safety reasons at the direction of the City Council. According to the petitioner, about 8- 15 cars park on Lynde Drive. The petitioner and the City have evaluated a number of options to resolve the problem. In an effort to eliminate on-street parking on Lynde Drive, the City agreed to sell a portion of the property to the petitioner to acconiplish some parking expansion. If a lot split is approved, the City would retain the northern 10,795 square feet of the Polk Street lot to place on the market for a new single family dwelling. The southern portion would be sold to the '� owners of the Moore Lake Apartments. � Staff Report L.S. #94-06 and SP #94-16 David Stewart Page 3 Both the Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the Appeals Commission have reviewed elements of this transaction/development proposal. The Housing & Redevelopment Authority has agreed to loan the petitioner a small portion of the improvement costs to complete the associated parking improvements. Special Use Permit Section 205.07.O1.C.(7) of the R-1, Single Family Dwelling district requires: Automobile parking lots for off-street parking spaces for any use on adjacent land, when the following minimum requirements have been met: (a) The minimum front yard is thirty-five (35) feet, except where adjacent property has existing front yard setbacks exceeding thirty-five (.35) feet; additional front yard depth may be required. A side yard and rear ^ yard minimum setback of ten (10) feet is required. (b) Proper screening, which includes a planting strip,. fence, or wall shall be provided on the property. This must be substantial enough to create a physical separation between the parking lot and the adjoining properties involved and considered acceptable to the City. The Appeals Commission considered and approved variances to the 35 foot setback from the street, the 10 foot setback from the nor�h property line, and the 10 foot setback from the west ° property line. As recommended for approval, the parking would be 20 feet from the Polk Street right-of-way, 5 feet from the north line, and 5 feet from the west line. A survey has been provided to illustrate the new lot configurations to be created and the setbacks as recommended for approval. • The proposed expansion will provide an additional 8- 15 parking spaces. The petitioner indicates that the expansion will help to eliminate the on-street parking on Lynde Drive. RECOMMENDATION/STIPIILATIONS: Staff recommends approval of lot split request, L.B. #94-06, r"'� subject to the followinq stipulations: � Staff Report L.S. #94-06 and SP �94-16 David Stewart Page 4 1. The 35' x 140' parcel adjacent to the Moore Lake Apartment complex shall be utilized for the parking expansion indicated on the site plan and shall be landscaped/screened according to Section 205.07.O1.C.(7). 2. The new 35' x 140' parcel shall be consolidated with the Moore Lake Apartment site as one tax parcel. 3. Special Use Permit, SP #94-16, and Variance request, VAR #g4-26, shall be approved. Staff recommends approval of a special use permit subject to the followinq stipulations: 1. Variance request, VAR #94-26, and Lot Split request, L.S. #94-06, shall be approved. 2. A new six foot screening fence shall be constructed on the northern edge of the easement across the Gilstad property. � 3. The petitioner shall install landscaping along the street as indicated on the plan developed by staff including the. ^ - following elements: A. 2 - Nanking Cherry . B. 6 - Maney Juniper C- 8 - Isanti Dogwood D. 14 - "Miss" Kim Lilac E. Weed barrier F. 3 inch rock mulch G. Vinyl edging 4. The parking lot perimeter, except for the area next to the retaining wall, shall be�lined with six inch coricrete curbing in accordance with Fridley Engineering Department specifications. 5. The petitioner shall install a six foot high board on board screening fence constructed of treated woo�d parallel to and two feet from the nor�h property line. The fence height shall be reduced to four feet at a point 35 feet from the Polk Street lot line. Engleman ivy shall be planted two r� feet on center on the north side of the fence. e e � � ,� %� � 3� David Stewart �� (.� c4� w �� `i ►�•, ,� ,. ., x v � , � ; �+� � ♦ • ,�,�� . „ ; 'C .a.w.�,.% ' ' � S ' z �w i; �� .. � -'' , � � � �; �f• . � . '2% �'��. f'��1�. .� - - - � • ' i 1 1 (�, r �� r %` A � � � � .0 � ~a�r ,!►• 1 , 1 1 � ' �� fLti G/ L�i�w� c . _ ��° j� �� a 9 As� .�. ��° � , Q ' "�u r„ • _ _ � _- .:IJ/L � �, ►. � r.� N ' �� •�� n a ' w � � 6 r rit�� , �i ,4 � �w ! �9 �`+' u . � . � ; . , � r�� . � �- i yn.r rlli �Ml: 4� ♦ l�j �i�M �.I�YVf NJ•N Nlt; � �� ' � � Drive � �p�" �� LYN�i � � . � � ; � • � . � �j 9� � r�+A *�" � '�t� ,� �R � (�ll !•►� G4 � � � i � i I s � � ri � e � � s � � � � � � , � � i I � � Nn - n�a .(w) (�14 (� �i� _ +• , �_ �� . � a ,n..l� Jiv� �0� �'`:ii.%°�'&�r' � %•, i/. .� .�. ,r'`� 'ia � • �� s�, , 6A �°'� �, _r, i =/A� •(fe) �: . v f ' i � . N/LLN7An � � �' � r•ii� . �ii� � �pi � I�av . (s11 AAA�TJbW (lf�o�. . � � '� (��j .. •.� ,r . ` E:�TATf f(� �,-/) aa� (�/i , � ♦ (�' � a,� _•~•• � �� '�� QL.1� r•• s. -r' i rv'rr �7''1 • AUD. � �S ViSiON � , , • , .»�..,► �t..r.r � , , ,6 �� _ .� - �� - i �_ ~ � �, *' � I ` .1 � - i � `. �� ` --- � _" �" � '•\:� _� _ - _! -- _ --- �. ' — - The Lot Split request will`d�vide'�he p�perty into two portions: The south po�tion will be-sold to the adjacent apartment property ' �~ to the south for additional parking. The north portion will be � : of sufficient size to accomadate.a new single family home. _ _ -_ n ': The Special Use Permit request w.ill grant special permission t4 allow parking for the apartment property on land that is of a �� different classification. � The Variance request will allow the parking lot to be closer to the west, north, and east lot lines than the City rules normally allow. LOCATION MAP F David Stewart • � ' `B 7 DRIVE . � 7 9 t r� J r � , �• � • � 4 ' IO . � B Q ie ,r ,j � iJ K i7 n /1 , �'� �'� � �i pR�VE � P � � p HlLLCREST u � Z� � M�OR�. ..., � o , R E . , ,� f �� , � � �, / • :, d.AK E �•• J� s �r ;►• � O � / . �' �EAC �� '°� � x � .: � ' � / � �,`'`�� PJ •-� �� L � � � EL L A D K� -� � � - � �-� .� P� .f° , ` I I , � �;. � o� G�. � fA/ H 4K'AD MY . • � � � 3 / t c�1 � � • � . '�' � �'6 � 0 i � , r F.,� � ` , i4 � �. �,� i . • , �� GAR 1+1 q . � , . , f.7 �:' �• !s JI ,ta .Ii tz �7 i �/I st i • � �� k"— - -- — Z . , / � � �� • , ? . Y • ��r� � 6 �, � � 6 I. / � 3 . ' ' � �� 4 3S �Q B � 4 3 • ' �. � ` Gl�ACE H/GH � � � � s �. _ . . . ,��,/ �r , 6�f�° 3�1 � • 5 � -: � ' �;� � r ` %� � B �3 Z z 6 : / � �, z �i � ,. , �� .� � � ,� .� � � to��: �.. �+ . , � �s 1 e . , Q`_ % zb �' ,� '` 5 A ' ", � s� 9 SCHOOL ADDlT/ON =q . 3 ��,t . � ► � �b " eM /L . : - ��- ��p �� _ � ' 16 t� � f � . �� io � . d,y ��. y� - G�� q: b i 2. 3 /'. 4+'- � a . y�'�' � B � ,� iz - - . - ✓a _<; � �� 4k 5 ?� 29 Ti Z� � ' 7 � 2� � /y B � � /! � /I • ` 1 � ; 3 ' �. 4 /S �I�'"` �"3I7��11i37lJ8'39 4o�41,iI / Z 3'rt s �'' B . . � I ,si ATH 1f, . A - - �.. .� :-.'! s- ..7,. �a.. -5- ;4 . 116 "i3/ '� _ . _ �. `6' - .•7 /� %0 9� 7 6 Sa4 7 t� l,/ 2 ORT • - � � - • 1l Z4' 7E' t ^ ' � �:, - p . 3 • i.'i �� •�. a 7 u io � � �:.,`:,�. +. 9 B 7 / 4 J Z W �1+� ; F . .. . . .'.' �9 • p 3 6 9 % �S 1; � • r • • • � � u r : .::. � 6 2, �eA � �� ! ,a ;0 4 ,y z. � • � ••� �l•ur/S 9 5 L � � S $e �'1 � � _ • � .� : . ' 3 B � 3 � , ; ��f ' t � �a 9 ,} 2 49 � t� _ • 3-2 / 6 e S ; � � I i�W/ 67 �� f''f�� V ��ij�V/I 6 4�/2 f � � y R.,. �...� � D?!ON • • � • • s�'i„ � W � . q - • • � � 3 • � ii 3 u l i � p s • ••� i �a 7 8 9 � � � T � 54 a.s t-• , J��'' , * q q 9 b ` S �_ ,o � �aKE�� os � , � / �{-;�• $►� R �- � -- - ✓o//ey View "' "' T .Ait •r3 ' , � q. HEI G HT s C/vis�ion �' '► b .`-��'.��.- �� gh�va , HK - - - `�`� y 69:4 DISTRICT LEGEND O R-1 ON8 RAYILI ONa'9 ❑ Y-1 LIGHT INOY8TRIAl � 4P.�� R-II TWO FAYIL� D1N0'8 � Y-2 XHAY� INDUBTp1AL � � �.t :�� S:•• � R-i GEN_ YIILTIPLE 01MO'8 � PUD PLANN80 UNIT DEV. � D �7 �► '� �:. ' � ¢ N-� YOBILE MOY! VARI{ � e-1 XYDE PABK NHIGXBORNOOD ❑ � �'I � ��• S P VUBUC FAC�LITIE9 F� 8-2 RFDHYELOVMENT D18TRICT � D,/ , •• _ �� C-1 LOCAI BUSIME88 � O-1 CpBEK L RIYER YqHBlRYATIOM � �� io 9 7 ' C-! OHMFqAL BUSlM888 � p-7 C8ITICAI. A9HA � 9 /p . C-, OBNBRAL BXOPPIpO � ` � C-11/ 08NER11L OFFICE � VACATED BTREF�B � ZONING IVIAP' . David Stewart KURT�i St1RVFY1N6 INC. . �n� �traat rus r�ctiwcn 4 pQ2 JEFfFRSWt STREiT N E. . - �+�-wca a+�Y COLUw61� H£lGKTS itlH�iESDT�t SS�21 j�;� =�_ i 5 y.�i-�, �' �xsor �ti'tot a.wwrsotn. c�:-Yae-st�c D�TE � 1�' � g�- i F � C?iAt �.1 Lt�: . . SCALE 1� '��=�• • M0. ��tit3 � , o=�eoka.eotirw.c��rr � � � t,�.�tiu.�.�� . . . _ �- v-t- � �,-r,r �s�scr-�c}.�-rs . " � �a �..� w � � � � r � i a �f1 � �� , - L_ � i �; - � �--t . . � . i � � � �� .r .__ �.J i_ a'�� .— �� titi � _ . r�� .-- �, � -,-- ,� •► .-. •-, , - ,- . . . ',, : Q � j � . ��._� ;` t L:, f� G-'• ;�• ;r ; `• � ! • • � � .. \" f � ' �,� J �- Q ._� l �.s, Ca. �- !' � ^� � i : � . , , --� �. � l - �, �.�.�� . 3 S c � �-f : � ` �= �� 1 � � �• f � � ---- ., - l � L��L�.�L�L�L�11�.�f�•%�� - i � -_ . ._ � ;� N P S t� `��-� --_ . . _; . . � � ��. ,�� _ ..� . - .� 20 ��► 3 . � �� " � ' .. 1 . . 1 .. • � �,; �� - ; � �. � � - �� _ .�� _� � . _� . � I ; � ! � � � � , �� .. � 1 l■..��V ■�w - - L� � �� ° . s�� _ .: _ , --�---�� . _ _ _ . 3 _ �. - s . -- � � . . ._ _ .� ,, - . � � . APARTMENTS . 3�. .z -__ � . �-� �. � - -� -: �- � � � I� � - . � � � .� - - -: ti., _ � c.� c� � � '� � �. � �,_ , • - �� -L � , - . �s �- �r ,- 'S - L. 1 k�..L'-�. �.1:-l�. � 1'T�� '� S t_: � �:.(� _ ■ ._ � � �� Drr�� - E � � �� m � �� . �� .. � � � � � � . c�. � L � � �J I O E � . r;;a ' �,; . j! � � . ,, - � r il '�� _ � � � �r Jj N ; � � .�� T , -_.i 1 � r� ' ;; zNc�,-r o ��E �-' • `-� T "�,� � � '� '� �____ -�.�: � • �l ;,,; � SITE PLAN � David Stewart Proposed Development Plan ,�„ F w « N C O ;� > G �, � � �. r°'� m , �"'� -� -� L Q y t ( ) ' ISS IM' L a 1 m �� David Stewart � f� � i^.'� �s� . �`�f _ _1 CHERRY ;ING _JUNIPER - - .1.---- � - � • - -- 1 . �—. _.- - �-- - --�---� -_ -� --i—' - ' - - J -'� -�� ----- � � --- -- . -. _ . �-�- - � - - -f � .�+— ' - . . . � _ .� � ^ ' (8)-1 AM�I,�D��V#IQ -- --- - � — - --- - - � --- _ ._ � --- �-- - � � `�. -- - : a �i � . , :_:. �.: + ; ; �� •r . _ , - – � – ' _ u�— – – - -- I – a � ,� -- --•.� — — — – v� _ - – . - � . ° ' � -.:ti �'�' - � �____...t._ �si_ � ^ ----�-"� _ � _ �. �, � �� . . . .. . � � - -�- - 1 - �� — -- -- - �. - , _ _ _ �- . 3 a -- �- ; _ -- �. --- �---��---- _ - _- _ - _ - - - -_- --=- - - - _` � � _ . . _ - -_-_ �- - ---- _-�.� _ __ __-a�__ � _ � - - - -- - __ _- - - __ - _ ---- ---- �,. . �, _ ; : . ; -- �_ ,� , ; � �- _-=_ __ -- .. - --- ---- - - _- -- -- : � -- - - - - .---,-- -T-- - � r -I- : -_-----�—�--*—�:._...-T -� . ' �� ° � - `�—;'�- t- � '— _- NANKING C RR ; _ .'- , :. ' -- T _�� _ �— --- � - -- -- - - _ - -._ _ . . , , . . ,, �. .. � � � , , � � . �KI �C ,., � _ --� _ . --- -- _ . ._ __ - . - � -�7)`� N11� , ; . - - ,- : ---.� --, -- -- -- . � , , ., , . � , , _ - - - - ---=--- - - - _ — -- __ - _ . _ - - . , -- 1 �,�,.n- '►�--��=t��.s : z - IJ��N � C�--,��Y i !'�" ��- ,,_., � - �u.,�,�r ��--, �-'' _ N . � � .T 8- � s�a-�.,T, 1- �wo �, 7�t." 14— L�� " �Utss l�iwt'� �a" S�A�:,•-5� Landscape Plan �V STAFF REPORT � I Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Coinmission Date : October 19, 1994 City Council Date APPLICATION NUMHER Rezoning request, ZOA #94-03 David Stewart, petit�.oner; owner�of Moore Lake Apartments Robert Gilstad, property owner LOCATION Vacant property located west of 5720 Polk Street N.E., south of 930 Hacl�ann Circle N.E., and north of Moore Lake Apartments. REOIIEST �To rezone the subject parcel from C-1, Local Business, to R-1, Single Family Dwelling. � a The request is related to a lot split, special use permit, and variance request currently being processed by the petitioner to allow additional parking on a portion of the property at 5720 Polk Street N.E., a City-owned parcel. The rezoning is a result of negotiations between the petitioner and the owner to obtain a snow storage easement along the south property line of�the subject parcel for snow storage by the apartment complex. ANALY3I8 � Three criteria need to be evaluated in analyzing any rezoning request: � ♦ District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning. ♦ District intent. ♦ Whether or not the parcel meets the district requirements. Compatibility with Adjacent Uses ancl Zoninq . The adjacent zoning is: Staff Report ZOA #94-03, by David Stewart Page 2 ► R-1, Single Family to the north and east, ► R-3, General Multiple Family to the south, ► C-1, Local Business to the west. Land uses are: ► single family to the north and east, ► apartments to the south, ► vacant directly west, ► small gas station/convenience store to the northwest. Rezoning the subject parcel would be compatible with the adjacent uses and zoning. 6 � i'"� Use of the property in its current zoning would be.limited due to the shape of the property. An awkward configuration of a retail use would result. It is also appropriate to end a zoning district along the west line of the property in alignment with the property to the north. ^ District Requirements The subject parcel is vacant, measures 120' x 170', and�has a lot area of approximately 20,400 square feet. The parcel, however, is land-locked as it does not have any street access. The owner owns the parcel to the north of the subject site and should combine both lots into one parcel. The subject property contains a depression and receives stormwater from adjacent parcels. With the exception of the lack of access, the parcel meets �he minimum requirements of the R-1, Single Family dwelling district. District Intent The City typically has a'site plan to review with a rezoning request. In this case, the petitioner is not intending to develop the parcel. If the property is rezoned, any future development plans would be subject to the R-1, Single Family Dwelling District regulations. RE CONII�IENDAT I ON/ S T I PIILAT I OldB : The request meets the three criteria used to evaluate rezoning requests. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request, ZOA #94-03, to the City Council, subject to the otaner combining the parcel with the .� parcel to the north as one parcel of record. � -z r � / ZOA �94-03 David Stew �' �� 1e � ; ; ; Q�• , �e' n„�,s K„ �E �. : ' �. pR1 � • • M R�• •a ° O HlLLCREST u� s� • , f f i`" i � � 1 1 E � • ;� ' �AKE :. J�v ab_ � �t :�. / � p R ., �- �EA� ,�� , j x � � � � / � � � °' u ` ' � 9 EL L A D . . / .. t t � ! • / - , � a ' ' . � � ^��TZ' P' �s � , , , f`,, ".. _ tQ G�¢ �.' , F�ai N_ 4ICA0 � Mr . ` , ��v6 �z,p j' � � , �f � � • � . ' /4 \ � �d � i � ' •� GARO W A . / /� - . � , / � � Ei �: 9. Js 7I 40 �i �z t7 ��! � i • ' �� ♦ .'� k...— ' '.. _ R p _ , ' � , �'yJ" �.�Sr� •. 1` �E '� 7 '. 6 I. / � 9 J % / ''� � ,,' �;�,,�` . s : ° G/�AC�' H/GH r_ '=s � � ' 6�r. �3 : j � i s I • � �� - , . • / � �r�, � � B /3 1 6 I � �: / `� ` ,� .L .� - � d i _ �Z � h .'•. a ��. �. fi � • � ,3 � : • e • �' � +� a " Z ° SCKOOL ADO/T/O/V O •; � � �. 1' S �O � � s _:. � � .� : 'b • ..,�, /L . � : , �� : •� �a��P�,=3��'101'1 q �Z'3 d�f•-�--. ..'� � � " .__� q: .E I G '� ' � '? 'T : _ ,,5� � . e � � 4k 4 3� Z9 TI 7�' - z�,. :/9 /J .. . '.•�-° c -�� I ?I i1 ;� �ll 37;J8 39 4a+�// K/ 2'3 E S L� 7 8 y/ . - ,�aTH Y- . � aht � _ . . . � �: �� -� :,, .. �� . .�� . _5- .� y� -_ -- � . 116 �.^ _ _' i! :1 /� %o y� 7 Q'S`,4 7. Za.e � 1 p�Z4' 1 0� O';: - - _:3 lE n � ��,@> . ,�: . ` S. +_. . .-,,L . . . . ,_ u .o � 9 B 7 .. , � 2 �� ` K- • • . . _ '� a � p ; � . • • • . . � . a ; ,s �� s p � • • • •' 2' �. � 2 i . 8 A � � '.l-' iB :0 4 ty I • • • : � " -� � �l • u , is 9 5 t � � S , ; $e�C ni 3 B � ; i � � ��_ • � ;�;: :-}_ " .�.- 7 9 ..4 �, ,� Z l ,» -: : . > ; .. . . ' ' 3 � 49 :!: r�- 3.=? � 6 0 S ' i . ... � _ _ • • ' _6 `�i�• f e r a +� , t o�� " -' �QRS. D/vl��lON: . s p -- � s� � ' a �e • • • • • n 3 : r . .•� � ii 3 y t i 4 i . ,- • • B I " 'o ; 8 9 Z rt 7 . 7 � ' S � . 9 i +�' • e y S l�T`•. •:: , � LAKE�� Os � � u 9 � � `I � a �O 1 2 _ IL � T .r�`-'-• H� ` S�i cR z _ . ✓olley� �ew � - b -�� 3 q. HE1GHT � C/vislion 1 '� 4�� -3� �R �ghwa� HK� - � �+ , �9.L,, � DISTRICT LEGEIVD O 11-1 ONE FAYIL� DMG'8 ❑ Y-1 LtGNT INOU87NIAL � PN4 q-4 T1N0 F1lWi.t OMG'8 � Y-4 ME11Y� INOUBTHIAL � � :•f�: :a�= � j� 11-i 6EM. �19lTiP�E Otl10'8 � PUD PLANNED UtdT YEY. � N •< < , 1'� �• � ,4 11-1 Y06tL[ MOY! PARR � g-� N110E VAAK NEIONBONNO00 ❑ � v� S �% �;� � rueus a�camea � s-a aeoeve�ooreur oisraeT � BD / / • � C-1 LOCA� ltlfINE88 � . O-/ CRFFK � RIYE6 YYESENIIATION � ' � /O 9 C-Z GEMEqAL lUe1NE88 � O-2 CRITICAL ARHA � 9 �o _ C-7 OENlIIAt 3NOPVINO � �' _ , C-111 08NEIIAL OFfICE 0 YACATED BTiEETS 'LI . ��o- ZONING MAP ,, 1 %� � 32 / ZOA �94-03 David Stewart ,r►- ,. �� cr� c4� c� (�� c � � � �,� f> >� 1� rc u « ,�M� � � � � l L x a,u�«� ; l '� n �� 'u� • » ir , � ,. � asrSv,✓ww+r /� �' � �L /h ii �� . . � ' C�• 1 � �'� �� -- . �% �� ' � � � � ��,, f •�� ,� .. � � �Ct) r ��`°�� ,R„(�3 � " � ` ` .p °`'o`r ' a�� R1�0 G�/ L�iywi�� +n�o� Q � /! � � � �� . � � i/ b � � �� / � 9 � �� ;�,Ali►� �� : •' =�► fi C � � u � �� ... ' �A !, r' "' .•/l/t. ' � � �1 7� �� .°� n � � � � � ,��r� nt�- ; , �, � ��1 p� -� t � � � ��° �� l3 'C � r�rr �Jt) � l _ � n r�r fr,i,r�r ra.a „�� •.�•r I ` � � ' � � D rive i � -N�� «LYNDE / Y � . i `' . • ~ 9i � �� er � -�+� . �i.na .•..xe.ic ''"'" "�� i . ,� (fr� i j 4d � �l ,,a'`" e " A') U� l,�n� C's) � � . � � � ! � � � � � ' _ . i � N� _ n�:a -r1� (�� i . �. r.. .r a+r.i d+v� ([o) ...:. �p � _ �� - �AM. I N• �� I � �.�'g+,. ' 6u1 �°'� 'y.,. ,A l'o> • ' . ` • (� ` �i � ii� _ _ �� el � I�.� (�sJ , N/LLN7�iln .� / (/l�oj � AQA�Ti�OW • � J �' ` ,r (r�� ---- � . E'�Ti1T� ii� � * �.-n . «av !u1 � /O � ��J �.-` " _' � . � �.• �. .� ..- �;� ; ' �' '�AUD. "`'' � S VISION ` ~�` � / ...R•v.si.r�r � . `� ;�t_ � -- 1—� ;� - �i �� ,.., • j N ,� � , � , _ „ _ _L� . ��----------- -----i ��% I . ,�. -- 1 i � .. ' . I� �� ' I • � ' G`, � �:------ -------- - � ---.--_• ___. ie . . . I' ,�� C� '� �� N� . _ $- u8) =-• — . ------------- ----�'�,----------- ---- -----' ' —=-- ------ — — — — -- .. � iB > � (� 7.7� S� _ �,, 9 .. � .--=-f---------___--______--------------,�--------- �� ,s„ ,r 1��i�K�w.. � ��~ I ' �� " � �'�`'~------- �� .r�w , i�cF z w _ ......ww' aiA 7l0_�� .. Aw / CQTd .�i The Rezoning request will allow the permitted uses to change from Local Business (retail and office uses) to Single Family (one family dwellinqs). G A � � ; . � � ; �. � -- - - -- . . _ . --- ----- --.. .— � i . ' - - - --�- - ----_ _ O; � �fj� c� � � ------ — — -- — --- ---- : � �:—._ _ . . _ . _ . � �,' TI� , i I ZO'8L ZO'08 � 0-�� O .j U "� , Z>.N p .� � � O r � mO�� ~a °'`I L'08 ��• U � f � � i � � 3 � [] u� ZOA �i{'94-03 ' David Stewart �ci. ri� � ti M��A r�! I �--------- O�, O� IW � �� 54 � 1,33a1S �I�Od . 0'091- _ 1 r �ri N T � F • LU t / / �� +� � Q a � ,� w ��\\\��\�� Z E-- r � i • ( � ' � � I atroa arwnni��H �--- -- _ _ . Proposed Development Pian � � � N c 0 � > � a a �o � � � PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, October 19, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning request, ZOA #94-03, by Dave Stewart, to rezone from C-1, Local Business to R- 1, Single Family Dwelling, to allow parking and dumpster placemerrt on the easterly 120 feet except the northerly 135 feet of that part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision #25, which is described as follows to wit: beginning at a point on the north line of said Auditor's Subdivision distant 221.7 feet east of the northwest corner thereof which point is also on the centerline of Central Avenue, then east on said north line a distance of 270.8 feet, then south a distance of 308.2 feet to a point on a line parallel with & 160 feet north of the most southerly line of said Lot 1 which point is 437.44 feet distant east from the centerline of Central Avenue, then west along a line parallel with & 160 feet north of the most southerly line of said Lot 1, 437.44 feet to the centerline of Central Avenue, then northeasterly along said centerline to the point of beginning and except the north 30 feet thereof said 120 feet to be measured�: along the north line of said Lot l. This property is genera].ly located West of 5720 Polk Street and north of Moore Lake Apartments. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than October 12, 1994.� Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 571-3592. DAVID NEWMAN PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR Publish: October 5, 1994 October 12, 1994 NOTE: SEE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PAGE FOR MAP AND FIIRTHER E%PLANATION OF REQOEST. � ^, /'`, - _ ZOA ��94-03, by David Stewart C:urrent Resident Qirrent Resident c�rent Resident 960 HACIQ�INN C�2 NE 5778 HAG`[�NN AVE NE 5771 CEIV�AL AVE NE Fridley PMT 55432 Fridley N1N 55432 F�idley NAT 55432 �, ��rent Resident Cu�rent Resident Cu�rent ResidPnt 5763 CE�1'II2AL AVE NE 5770 AAC[�T AVE NE 5760 HAC�IlV AVE NE Fridley NIld 55432 Fridley 1�Il�T 55432 Fridley NIld 55432 c�rent R,esident 1021 HA�Y LN NE F�idley N�T 55432 c�rrent Resident 995 LYNDE I�.2 NE Fridley NIl�T 55432 Cuzrent Resident 941 FIIL�n RD NE Fridley NIl�T 55432 C�rrent Resident 1 LYI�TDE IS2 NE r�ldley 1�Il+T 55432 Curr�nt Resident 1020 LYNDE DR NE Fridley NIl�T 55432 Cu�z�ent Resident 990 LYNDE I�2 NE Fridley MN 55432 Q�rent Reside,nt 970 �Y IN NE Fridley NII�T 55432 C�rent Resident 5695 HAC[Q�l�T AVE NE Fridley Nd+T 55432 Currerit Residerit 930 HAQQ�II�T CIl2 NE Fridley I�IIJ 55432 Cx�.izent Resident 1031 Li�VI� I�.2 NE �idley MlJ 55432 cairrent Reside,nt 1001 LYNDE �t NE Fridley 1�ff�T 55432 Current Resident 1010 LYl�IDE I�2 NE Fridley NIl�T 55432 CAirrent R�esident 950 L�+1DE IR NE Fridley P�T 55432 Current Resident 960 HA�iY IN NE Fr'i.dley NIN 55432 C�rrent Res;�*+i- 5701 CELV�L AVE NE Fridley NIl�T 55432 Current Reside,nt 5650 POLK ST IdE Fridley NIl�T 55432 �ent Resident 1021 LYNDE I�t NE Fridley Ntl�T 55432 Ctxrrsent Resident 1030 L�IDE Tgt NE FYidley Na+T 55432 Currerlt Resident 1000 LYNDE IH2 NE Fridley 1�T 55432 Current Resident 910 Li�TDE I�t AiE FYidley NIl�i 55432 c�rrpnt Resident 950 I�Y IN NE Fridley MN 55432 C�rent Resident Cxarrent Resident �ent Resident 940 H�ZHAWAY IN NE 5741 POIK ST NE 5725 POLK ST NE F.�dley NIlJ 55432 Fridley I+MT 55432 Fridley 1►�T 55432 Mailed: Current Resident 5740 Polk Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 5715 Polk Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 941 Hill Wind Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 5750 Hacl�nann Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 5730 Polk Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 1031 Lynde Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 ZOA ��94-03, by David Stewart Current Resident 5747 Eentral Ave. Fridey, MN 55432 Current Resident 5725 Pol.k Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 1001 Hill Wind Rd. Fridley, N�T 55432 � �---. � n, �� -�� , � h �uf 4! y?' { � ' r �i� `�°� �s� ri,.,, � , � } .�, _ ' �,� , r.`._rrw�nF -.t�Y, x. a.� . ,�. .t �e rr .-:q b � � +'v.tr��v j -;�:Y :5� ` - 7r} 'i � � = PROPERT ,� r —?' s �L ' �'{ 'k'� 3 V.,. : Address.. �" Propeny Iaent m t ..�,�, " � � r, ��' - �� Legal descripti , .. c,},,;� r ti , : LV� " 3 +J� J Ci ��. � 'r '4 Cutrent zonin� , �: ., � . ., k� • s :,ti 3 � WI �r ' a� "'t : � ..{ r -�, y . -`� r � t � . �. a � z �f . .. . ., , . . ;- � ,. . t - -�.-.r �. �.. �- ,. .. . . _ ,; .- . . .,..� ,: --� � .� . _ . ,. -' ._,. o' - . .- ... , _ . • ... _. . . _. _ . ... ... . .. . _. ....x .. . � . . . , . . ., . . .. : Cc�. . . .. .., ... )II �11I y .' �,� ,: � � � ''' � - �, �, f ,.: , �`�� ° , �,t , ' ,� , � 5"� �� G'42t��i "`�'S 5 'vttk4°� k :-:,-t < � �,! �^ F P y � ; � �� - .��-, ,� - �_ � � � � <..�- 4 . �:� � �,.�, i �3 fs � e 'I .ib. � �t ,: , "yL � L !'� . " � { ... .•, . .. _ . . ._„ . ..r . .. .,. t a �. r, u - � 5 v s � 'S� _. 4, -: ri, iK i. r- ¢ 7 a e ^t ^^^��1 d�:�y y!� r rM� � w iQ .! � V ��`SIGNATUItE ��,F,t �'.�iN�� l �, �P � � }� �'+rY� � � �� yb�i+�T ,�l'��j 1 � u#�� { t�f�X i�'+'��«, f� aJ �p'�y >T-r � 'q'�ias"k� � 5 . �l�4 3kL Y �4 �4. 1 � �7" . - - ' �`:i s'� C �Y: t f '� }'V 3�� r - ,�, r s ''�*i � ` , �� ' � - �. h �. 1 +. ,. - � . it :: 2 t '_ � r .t � t. �, ��. 1 �iv, ... �: yY -y L�� ('��/y�/�/� �,SK „�',� �Pr Pl�.F f ,a �� i � ^4� � ih Y r .� �i �.. < F - � y ti �-3 . � � �.�i'�i...�.1V1IVU � ,?a rY 7 '(, �Sx ` yn �g �y.m 4 I i ti � � ^° .� W r�v P Id (� �i s ��' -9 _ {. [ � �: :, � �i ��+�,�J °�r' jr ° xs°-a' � �r� :. � 5E F ' �,� ' s �. +� . §'3 !ri rF� s �3 . �, ^Y - r.d� �5- . � � , .� . Permit ZOA # �'� � �� i 'k� 1��r�]�'�yt7l � � , � �"�� :s r�` j��d� P' "� � �A � ^�� f� v: �r rS� f �; 7 a' E 1 .r .. r � 4 y. . �►PPlication recerved by �;� � ��` �� a � Y' .. t' ,a ,��: � � �...,.. �� ,fi � � � ,, , �: . � :. . ' ,� � ! � Scheduled Plannuig Comitussion �ate :: k�` ,i. 9�J�t�{ Y4 D ��t.S�� 9:Y y.l 1_ f.A �i.? 1 H 2 t. }- _ f 4 C�" #�� ( k ` iy�' ` � .- . . � - - � �_ � � 4 � y 4 ' t � �r' 1 Scheduled �ty Co�cil date. 'n ,+�'3"� *�'- '�� {rY,.a�"xt�' a":� ��i � � : �.'��ti� i '� ' .'�' '� '��' ;i 1�� + , ��`" �. .r�• . c zx � j �� y k � ��i r ? 1 � .t s ��'� t f � � , E � a � �� a . . � 's' .r� �'� t 11 5 � . > re i . � t i .i'�' ��_ 'c 5-pR 5 'r- � ��,�F�-. '� ��C �n. �1 jl t �4 f �e t7 �y��,. % "r a�..X. 4� S a � r = a z �.., � -�-.��4�c..., C� r f'.., ' � A ; -��. �j �c.-�i�' �t v.,i� t .�)., .n"3 ,i�. �� . . . , . . .. - ' �' �-� }/�+� 2 - - _ __ � _ _ ��:� 1�� ;,f � - � . � t ��. .`/' . ' .. . . � ... . . ... . . .. . . -. '}. . . . . . �,°`'a` �:' � ��'d�� '_ ' i . -�.'� wN � a e�'.tt ?'� ��_a .+' a � - �. -� s'��i��v-"y ,°'y�r;�.�,�f } � r�vT'��{�' � ?� ',�;-i y �k� � i G � 3 +1 y.� -� � o z-j C.r..` n, 4r,� � �.. r,_ c P iP.- 1 � 'S re,.� k��'i �.��'��_' ,x �� .y� 1. a,.r�� - r � a i,_ ?�.F��-'�fi�i'�a,�� k �� . .�1n. L > a .:,. a� :..F - � ; � �'' - ;` tl a G;j : r, .t''r� '�' , i+. . �4� y,fz F-� � a , A �'�.y � � x _ a .. ! � Fx 3"l �; �i`�s'27s'�ir� ' _ ' . . t �3 �. . � . . . _ . . . . . . � ... . _ . , t'J � . . "t�. . xs;h . .. , . ., . . . _.. , � . . . .. . .. .. , ,_. . . ,. , , . _ . .. . . _��4;`' S u d�� .....,,,a., . .�..� r =_ y��.:� _ �,�"�: r r ; xr ;� -�.,. M� , ,,;;: '� , �+. i ;�,� . �. ��;��_ y�� :� r.; � 1�1G�hOII �pIIl� �� '�� f .�� , a , ��nn4} T� � � , l ��4.':�:�� 5 "_ s F� i '^ :'.""s34� c,� ,� �,. �. :�:, � BIOCiC � _.� �� s;:._ _ ... _ _,_. . _ ., f,: LL`� �, w wv .� � .,, � ..� ,. 5 1� 9 y i ,� �� s' � Permit ZUA # $A �'� -�°l}�'7i; ! �" , j � ' �'Re r x'�� y xA lic�tton received b >,. ':�. .� , � PP ; , , .,. 3":,;' . Scheduled'Planning � , J } Commission date � b , j "� �C�1�UIC(� Cltj► CO1ll1C11 (�c1tC`� '�� > �-�� ` ? � f.� , a ` q" t r ` ' �� 4�� a�`�`�`��tx;$��i; �,�$ "" U .r�; � � i� � � �'�,- � d t � b � + � 1�, r} y.�..�$�l ^'"'�' t a ±'c* r i � t . :� r � t � � ..� f x � �....� Lr� . j'� .r� t . . , . � . . �- � c ��. �� :U t /Y— '+ x '" ,;. ,, a ti � d(�1LlOI�, �m c�q; � 1& �s. � ' y a� 1�T��FORM��° �._.. �.. i . � o� s�bmrttal,°see m � �. C:IcNY��I� ;'. p>...�, �A3z� c�r� IV a f ,'� � A� r i4`; �, ,� ;,�,.:_, �.....y! � � � �u� ;� -�� , u ` R; T� • :�••—._ ,. �.��:;Jl �x�-.,Vi � �i ,::±r� r.�.. � 9.,_� ��.4;�`- �+��, r , y� , � - .-,�`��^(ti � { :;F?t,�,5i' ., '� �� T+� �-� e�' 1. ,�� '� �'a � ,n:uc ,} � � �.,1 ' �_"'+��i15Y.4 C 1y `1 y .- �R � */ ': �c �„ � t 'Z M w, .. �SM �� r �� l�, �: ; t,� .:i yy� � i [u f. G" �' '�=-� ;-��` �i '�� £ ' � - f ' . V � s - ., ,{,, ,� r f �-�,'Y� r i k'ri�� .� r�� ^� ; � :�Z 4� x-� ?��y � '� rdF ..g �F � '� . q. . Y.y 1� Y', A''i . m} f 3k�8°i ..- ' za ,� � 3, r �r _ . , .,i . . -1 APPLICATION NIIMBER STAFF REPORT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Pianning Commission Date City Council Date Vacation request, SAV #94-03 October 19, 1994 Mearlin Nordstrom, owner LOCATION 501 Rice Creek Boulevard N.E. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. RE4IIE3T To vacate drainage and utility property lines. The request, construction of an addition to ANALYSIS easements along the north and west if approved would allaw the existing garage. . The petitioner owns Lot 9, Block 2, Holiday Hills Second Addition. The petitioner acquired two adjacent "slivers" of property on'the north and west sides of the subject parcel and has since combined them with Lot 9, creating one taxable parcel. Six foot drainage and utility easements were originally dedicated on either side of the lot lines of Lot 9. As a result of the consolidation, the dedicated easements bisect the buildable portion of the lot where the petitioner proposes to expand the garage. The City does not allow construction in easements. The petitioner requests that these easements be vacated and new easements dedicated along the new lot lines of the combined subject parcel. There are no public utilities located in the easement areas. Vacating the easements would not adversely affect drainage patterns on the subject parcel. Water currently drains in a southeasterly direction across the driveway and into the street, as well as draining from the rear of the structure to the east to the street. The private utilities have been notified of the vacation request, but have not yet responded. The petitioner has�not submitted plans for the garage expansion at this time. Staf.f, however, analyzed a potential garage Staff Report ^ SAV #94-03, by Mearlin Nordstrom Page 2 expansion by the petitioner. The existing garage is 26' x 30' (780 square feet). The code permits a first accessory structure to be 1,000 square feet in area. This would allow an addition of 220 square feet (11' x 20') without a variance. The proposed expansion would not impact lot coverage (15.6a). The plans shall comply with the code requirements or a variance obtained. The original easements were 12 feet wide. The City is unable to obtain the additional six feet from the adjoining property owners as they are not a party to the request. The petitioner, therefore, should provide 12 foot easements along the north and west property lines. RECOMMENDATION/STIPIILATI.OIJS The request does not adversely affect.adjacent properties. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request, SAV #94-03, to the City Council with the following stipulations: l. A 12 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the inside of the west and north groperty lines. ,--� 2. The garage e�cpansion shall comply with the code requirements, or a variance obtained. � ° a �'"1 '• - " � I � ° �t „ � _ -` _ , + . `� � . y � I -.��-- o - .t __ifl +° �. I � 5 ... ] .. 1 �. -,c... I i :I` ,. .A � m = '•;' �,— .` � �t �� ` �° ?ti� , ,� �� y' . _ � 3 = C � I � � r•,..� ��e' W ` •s .�.-� ..� �F � � � `' W , G _ �, '� .� Cti w =� �. .,z 4 .. '.• ' I < .. i' o' J < �Y U ' p Q� ,. `: ' �) � �,� � ti 26 � = _ _ � 2 ° - �. _, s � � �� ::� i •� _ - • "� / I , ,��t. `.,i �::.o . – " �' � � �7'' S: �' �y �a � ' 1 r«�� . ��: , � � - f ��: •.\ a s .� ' �,�' � �e #' - - . � � .�i� I il. �.e� � � lll � G� ` � � �' ic I ' � ✓ . ,Jr. Ci °,i � > ��' V �� .f2� 3 I � � I . i �. � � G. �0 % i �. .. _ ` Oti,: _. �/ � SAV ��94-03 Mearlin Nordstrom . , � ,e., � -. r. ' -- )` .\ •,1 ; :,; ' . . :y y , i ` •. , ja � r�1 '. � .\\��,,'r• t�l+ �/� �'. 1 �` �\\ 9 A, .�'� :% � � ' .� . ` v n �,�c �-',S'` .L t t . ;;. ; . y' ti. � J/ `��, - be r�d� � ��'��\ ?3. -' - •�r'i�� +r�, �� • � �. � /� \ . � il�ve ; �° $ - + K f C��' •y'; t: 'iF ) � �IZ � 95 I �`� '�'V/ f/:4 �r.. ~�• �&3 9� vS �6�)�6.a � ^ f :' R' • ' • :tsJ ��f' J•, J /¢ � ,y�/f ` ..t j . ,.. S%� � a ,� '.. �y . i 2 �o ^ ��q� s ;;i. I�' .. 4 '�� I 1 I I � � � "=\ s� : ' '�F .� - �� '.• �/¢ B , �� \�' � : \ :�. _ ' -� �-- ?: - ') F � a� I �' : �/¢ ti i' qh �p% � � _ •% �- �,{ • �•d � -- n l� t� .�` i �� e � � t� � � b � � �� F � 1Y . 5:�) <<:i � r) !t' 5, 5 /I e v I . t+ �� ,?� � � • ars. ,,,' y sy�t> � .• � - I o �--� ��,,,� �e � , ��9 � ` � � � , \ �y �_'° �M`"o.�. . i � � > �6 - s ,.e S 6 = 6 , �s� � $ I . :� � Z � � \`'� - J� M1's . �' . i�f.� e �` .� � � ' . Q .o = f. �, `'.J - "� t �. r�) :'s;- ,; . ly , •.8 ; -� �,. y e ' � .� ' ' ��d . /� "� t . . ti ___ •• r: .4 / •, ��,,-: � � � 9 ` , b : t , �;' �, :� 7 4��;�p°' ,�, '' t`'a,'„ v � � i /2 � � ,)' `� '-,+;' =•' � i �. � • ' _ .: ��, � �9 �8 � �� ,n . ; �; , 4{iE. �M�6 � `�� - I ` � :�:.�._ - a f= �� - x.` � � ; � �° _ % _ '' 'J N .. � � .� � -i- -�- � ---- �-- � ' ��° —r , � � —��H.` �i��.� � ,, 2 t�, f'' r�� '�? -�v � y' � ": � : PN : �o � � � �=.. Y ��.g, a �. y � �ai; , , ='�= �p � � ,o, m ,, --- � -� '=� ° ¢ � H:• � : 3 �% W . - � y^." ` _ � �. 4 Tsnare Z •>i :�:�o� I � co �'. .� �p B , tiw Parh ' m _�S , .¢ry) z � S� _s •�� ,r :r �n� 'c� " \ • I �,. � ?; �, J •� o a 9i � 'd, �- 1 ., � i � . � •r; � ...rt.'a/ ! �..r (!')+ � � }� < � • iw-�^ •t.s°'��' � • � �� /°"/! J 1 � fA _a3 : < .� � ;✓ � ` . ;�–= - �rr%,.. `` :1 "'` "" ., o 's �.' � 1 �:f� a' �.si� p�� I °� �� -1�', � S'iJ� e o.i ; a+I*o ^� - i '� a..r _ . . > s.. 'Pr ,• I o = F 4 ' �t �R• o a �e � ve, � io - F ' . _ I ,�, -. �� zfe f � � ;' i r' :V: e�7j ?Z ' �` ,.� � ' - w d = 5 _ 5�7 ` 3� 2 ! - ': 'B .� 7, 6 5 4 3 `�� d �-r e_� •v •J � ~ a ? ' � � i 5 t. :3 9 �(O j �- i � ' I � 8'9. i EG .''- � rs i ss • aa �a 60 'e'� i. do so 'd �� :� :s I s� � i.i � I or .... -.- .... �� _... s`a a ,,,;, c� I ' 67 AVE. N. E. .� � Y v -� v n >t u ao aa a.z, .. ,.}, �,n v� , v ric Bo � 6� Bo 'f ?a,. i g� n I x r. �i!. ,'n} r� .r: ;Y a+;- sl` �.7!' 'ss` �a7 �� s- I _ � � � I �' } = " � a � - � : � : 3 - •G .., �, /Z /3 _ !a : ,s � �0 9 � B 7 � 6 � � ` -Y i . \ - ' ! ,� `� • { y3�-� 1 f' if )• � -�'t 1l 9 /1 ' � - �� j o Eo i'+ J s �s si � BlJ) BiD m!) •• i �: o�, >, � ° �. __ _ � ; =. :� , = i o ::r' ��. .�, ! f- ! , � .A; R� . I' '�''�}/�±r'y_�� r/`�� `, �2z�, o ��jj �E � "�:� :E',-I� 4- � s�- Z �6�/,. �;1 /V i�l � '� _ �� '~ E;. 4, f 2 1 `}e» i�r. I a�� z 1 I W � � - - =s%66 TH :.nAVE. 'N�. E. ° � _ '��I : � ° . :L I � , _ _. -. -. = f :� � -s , , . su e�„ I e,,, ;6 I JF' 1 'i.� � � -• -_ t � -�^ • � . -.a I • y: �� £ X: � l•, I �l. � "�: �-2,^3 B� � ; � � � � �� j'E�� ACE �' - - 3=: � � . �°,�A�' 2 - - �� 4�i -- R�c�� a� _ ��' ' :-� : � . = � -( .�'s,� ,�,' .e� ..�R:PL ; ; � .. ' -: - .- - . . � �. __ .f 't,; ; .e. ..e - � :�y 1 �� RirC E' � - - � 'CREE/� � - � _ . �"ERR�4 �'� �- _ � � . -_�; . � � _ � = � -.�;N� �"�- - ��4�--- � - --' � - ;-- -----L'�'i��f"�ik��'�t�-��{'��:��srr. . _-- CEH7£Ri_ _. . - - � LOCATION MAP SAV �� 94-03 ` ' Mearlin Nordstrom ' ��':3 ' N I �� .- � - � � � � � y �;, •`� � �--�--- -:�—��-- -.-� ��;:� � � ur�e �cr� '� .�°_°'' � "t �. r-� p 'v;� "3 � � � Q � :� � �-.9'.. : '� ' � '� �E � � G�G`� `� ;� �+� � a a tMU X, � .�� '>, � `� � � � `� • • �' � � - �. � � .�„1 � 4'� � � `� e. � � `� - � `� �_ � ��- � �' `�r � E;.:,� � _ `:� `� � � � ,,�, .::�.� _ - � � � � � . ,, � �` ,,� g � `�, s ! � � �--� � � � � `� '�' '� � b' � �� • �, �'R .� �C ,r . �� '� � � ' �;.� ' e .� y� k. (�� a�.i >-•� • ! �' L�� . t \ � 9•�.. �y�� - ... +e� . ` ` � N E� �1.2 � . . • t ---� ` � f. . ' . _ "_. �.i • -�F� 3 , --- - ` .� . �. �� \ � �3 +1 � 3 L /• � / / 4 - 'f� / . S * i � s y z� . W ��`�i — - . ¢� •�. ' �4 v T 1 , Z f` - �, l t � 9 �•.i, �•/ 3 2�/ � � is 5 K � �� W --s 4 " � �� R � 1 2 � O['T. JT 2 y� i6 1 Q • =a _�/•�/S � - \ `��' ZD z7 2z 23 3 �2� .i 3 r� i s Z � • �. N� --� _ a • �� 7 aw.sot �ry �� W : " , � �qY. z ,,� `� �^ S j , � s s � °.i '.r 6 ._ j�%- ,. 6 6 f � B 81 � �} �5 Z 7 7 if /6 i _ 9 : �: � �o � � , � 3 P � � B- - � a �� 5 � ._ j 1 � !`� � � I , ij b �2 : // /o 3 2 :3 `4 � � :, . � � B .f �� / � 1. J � � S �� ';' r 1� 2 14 /3 /1 . S � � t� ,�,` L � � � tc b ' �'" / �A� : ? �, e 4 � � _ j ''° � C��` � y � r � 2 �B , i f� p �s p Z � ' 4 c .� " j i /o ii i2 y � 4 a. � c� � � a g3 . � ' ,S .� � � TM ' �� L .9 � ir 1 F e r �"� � f 1 + ii .� '� i . TER R �3 � � s ��•a jl � G .i � � �7 � �P�= f i< � 414 � e 8 d S 4 } 7 * ' �o `� � u � ! 7 4 7 � 3 2 � F_ B f � B:� f'I i Z � 8 7 G S 4 3 /0 9 b L 9 � /0 4 S 4 � S � 2 .� ' s � • 6 7; 9 io . a; ii �! /E iS /i /s 9 B 7 6 S� ' /� /L ' iJ / �: > 4 3 2=I s'¢ ,9�2 �/ 2 ic l is � . � , � / � � �y/�!� y. Y � 3 E/r1 // . /O . � 7 / ir S 4 / Z ^ � TH. AV � 2 r q ir fw a ENUE p, - � � �S /6 K � p za. � . s ,r s�� 6 s ` -:3gCH0� � ,, A a , � 7�EI�R T . 6 �— �-1!— :%t� � 9 � 1 y L /%.: /apL y 21 ,G:S+i4 c� � ��T t � WiV t-rn C 3.:2 �_ /- 1 '' • 4F/ �6 Oa 3 � 7 7 —. . . t i�_ . .. . _.. �_. � .._�.�too� . . . :.. •• �•��' ••�. )� .�. . __._�-----��_-" .CTOCCT �� • i�r� � � V � f� -� �. T-cc-�-= �:r:�' �/.a:��J: :L� •- Z,4, � •.�; �. . :;'. r = i _ y 8 �7 � ` . _T � � �. �� =� �� :� a.��: i. 75� ' J: " 2 � 3 2 / N�� v� '..� _' Y o - �.i:� .�� t:��' P 3 � / ic q// ro � �sl �. L; • .�� ,. �,. `_ , � �. ✓.-. a _% �, _ � � :� �: -• � •� DISTRICT LEGEND .:i:l. ..�},. • • s � • , • � . Y��• • � • • • .1: �•I� � ❑ 60 �� ;�� ••,� �� f� �.� � fl-t ONE FAYILY DWG'S M-7 LIQNT INDU8Tfl1AL � LAN -�.;.�::�.r .t%::i�' • � �� FQU�H� 'q�� p-2 TWO FpYll� OWp'S Y-p HEAVY INOUS7HIqL � . f` .,_,:, M � � s F �D � .-� •'� ��,• I- �• �519 • e• N-3 6EN. MULTIPLE OWG'S VUD pLANNEO UNIT OQV. 4 �� A ' A w � • y� A'4 NOBILE NOYE PARK ❑ S-1 HY�E VAXK NEIGHBORNO00 ❑ • � ' � • • � �., • ' � � � �� P PUBLIC FqCILITIES ❑ ELOPYEMT OlSTHICT �� a • i %SI i• • �• • 5-i NEOEV Q . 9 /� � �r I ^��i t�` ��• � • • • • C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS � •� • ��I� • � � � O-1 CREEK 6 RIYER PqE3ERVATION i � DRIVE '� ,0•�•�� C-2 GENERpt BUSINESS O-2 CRITICAL qREA � � � C-3 GENEHqL SHOPPING � ' s f 7 1 � - / �3:3 2 � 19 ' C-Nl 6ENERqL OFFICE ❑ VACATEO STqEETB '� �� ,�� ' � I I � i .� , / lipe � �-°t 8� 2N0 � vVes�"1yNOL�DAY � � L --- B�O� , _N. 58" � 09' 3,, . � ; � ,_, f .�.,,�� -9_S3 __F � � � � : _�� d �° /'� • . . . i v N J� ; ..- � O'A " (qi ''� � : �-� � 1f � °•v! � ' •-� � N�„i� � �p�' p p :;;'• � i L%'t g� gl o�k �,�%--' � � L � �.` � � ; '�. e of �„°r-- �`� ��" , O) � �.�air� i'n �� , �-� �� .�" � � � � � � ,: � �, 0o cn . � � � _ �� .y 'r a` ' �v j � � . =�C\ 00 I ' � W � 2 �� . H z � � � 1 1 � � � �A ��T J�� JN � . � ' 29.fl i ` i'�� _, ' , �-` � � � � . � ` ' / ♦ : C `. ; � , <. , Q`�� 9� � SAV ��94-03 Mearlin Nordstrom . � ..� . . � ��; %'�c, r ; � „� � ..t : • _ = . �.--' r �� , i . �� =� � J _• � , , . � , , , . ,_. , . � , L-- ; "i � '"� /e�rl9 � ` � � os� va . �. • ___ / ��— ' �;-�= � • _��•' __� I � -. ).a' �.�� ♦ . . --i�—� �4�^ \_C� `'�"- tl� ` �' � ^� � �� o Qp� o `�� P � � a � � � �� (�� p � ,ao � � � � o �, � � <<; �. , : ,-. . � �_. � ��ti 1 r Z `F � N . J V • � �0 � �J � � '' . � , . 0 � � � �E + � t ,. i r `-�o,L6�2.9,� � yo S_-- ___ �--- 6 0.62--- -,� d= [;� = EXISTIN C C i° S�� M E N T �s. 38 02 0��. ;�_ �= 249.73 {� n�ost soutfierl y co, _� '= PROPOSED EASEMENT `°` 4, 8'°`� 2, " = OVERLAP AR ��, ,,�- ° �� SIT� PLAIV �� g ��. � � FRIDLEY MUNIC[PAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN 5543? •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-I?ti7 September 19, 1994 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The City of Fridley Planning Commission will be holding an informal hearing on a vacation request, SAV #94-03, by Mearlin Nordstrom, to vacate that part of the drainage and utility easements which lie six feet on both sides of the line between Lot 8 and Lot 9, Block 2, Holiday Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota, and between said Lot 9 and Lot 8, Block l, Holiday Hills Second Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, and which lie within the boundary of the following described tract: That part of Lot 8, Block 2, Holiday Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of said Lot 8, 15 feet � northeasterly of the most southerly corner thereof, thence northwesterly to the most westerly corner of said Lot 8 and there terminating; also Lot 9,.Block 2, Holiday Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota; also that part of Lot 8, Block 1, Holiday Hills Second Addition, lying southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the westerly line of said Lot 8, 55 feet northwesterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 8; thence to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 8, 99.65 feet from the most southerly corner of said Lot 8 and there terminating. This property is generally located at 501 Rice Creek Boulevard N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be hear�l shall be given an opportunity at,the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, October 19, 1994 at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 571-3450. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than October 12, 1994. DAVID NEWMAN � CHAIR � PLANNING COMMISSION . � "SAV #94-03 - Mearlin Nordstrom ,� A��arlin Nordstrom 501 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Paul Steen 525 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Duane Prairie 489 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Barnette 541 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 � �vin Bohman ` ' Rice Creek Blvd. NE FL-idley, MN 55432 David Reinisch 473 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Philip Eberhard 436 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mitchell Michurski 454 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mailing List Mailed: 9/ 19/94 Woodcrest Baptist Church Roland Knapton 6875 University Avenue NE 537 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, NIN 55432 Fridley, NIN 55432 Gary Knight . 513 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Virgil Herrick 477 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 William Boatman 531 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fred Kunze 449 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Joseph Garthofner 485 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Brian Anderson 442 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 554.32 Quentin Freeburg 301 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dominick Zawislak 497 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 LeRoy Rither 424 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 David Keding 521 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Arden Foss 461 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, NIN 55432 Eric Odell 430 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 John Haines 448 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Jon Larson 315 Rice Creek.Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Donald Babinski Cecile Lindsey John Ellis 333 Rice Creek Terr. NE 347 Rice Creek Terr. NE 540 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fr�dley, NIN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, NIN 55432 � Gerald DeShaw � Ernest Petrangelo Donald Dibos 530 Rice Creek Blvd. NE 520 Rice Creek Blvd. NE 500 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Schroer 490 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Jerome Cichosz 460 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 David Newman Planning Comm. Chair 7635 Alden Way NE Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Peterson 480 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 James Becker 456 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 City Council Members ''� David Harris " 470 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MNM 55432 Arthur Swanson 361 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 � � %� � t g . "•',rv•u, x .: i'� �"°� � . I`_. .�. : � J . � Ct:=j�. � . .��4'��. � CITY OF FRIDLEY � � � ` � �' �t � 6431 U1�TIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. ` ' � � � �� "; �� ;`°' �° � ' ' � � ° �+ ` ' `. � � {�kF } �. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 � 1 � � �� r � � , � � �- 4, � y � � t , , n w r � � i a � t�; r+` 4� ';,}` i d1 &Ya,�✓.�� *}{1 GitPY��p -�Cwrl�41 �ri ta ;.�,�3 'd.�ra �q, �:; `�'^i �, '4�' 4s�'�r'��1�� t�+' _. . . `�� . � � .�. ,:r'7 :. �,,-,twk .� a �:: ,F �,:� d' ... � . + . � ;� (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVEL`OPMEN;T4 DEPARTMENT� . � ' � f,, ; 3,'; �� } � � r � � � , �. � , , , ` �� .� . , � �.t �,tr� �'� � , � VACATION�=APPLICA�'ION��FORM,�� ;'� y �.,.�'�� `� �r� -_ � . �� . . � ..: � �� , � PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for,submittal; see attached �, Address: �o� �, c � CN� t� �/v�� m ` . � Property Identif'ication Number (PIN),�?o-Z!/-Z/-ooa�//S/-,?o-2f/-Z/-oaz�.I�,�o-Z�21� � Legal descripdon: 9 Z � �i� t� o � ' � �'� o ' • , Lot � Block � Tract/A dition ` • ^ _ , _ _ .; Legal description of easement to be vacated: `� 0 8 � • � Lof B o��C / . Z? , - . , �. Current zoning: �l. %.a Square foofa.gelacreage r '-� � � � ..x-�` � < � ` �l � ' �1 ,� �: �� ,, t � Reason for vacattoa '�o �,�� ' ;�' � � , , : � � ��°�GrCsg� �TD ��Sr�i°riLL�:S Have you operaxed a business in a city which reqwred, a,busines.s.license? �_ _ Yes No _� � If yes;�yvhich city� �: � ��, li f� �� ' � � � r��`Pr"��„ �,,� , ti �� ,� ,, � � t , , �,�,.` � , �� -11 ye$� �11A.1. �� l Uu$�ii.S.S! � �Yt�aa3 Z¢ ° k �t b � T> � T+J�eI �"�zb � k 7j� n4 � � t,: � - . � !; �� - t ip � ;. .�' ..5 :� , � ` , , „`�,' - . � . � . . . - . ,.. '� .. ',: , . e �.r�ia Ji�°-�rei.. ii; u'y ra!' t!'�3'�32h�u�'i�'q k��`i � M ar!r� -M�� s�'L.� �� -s Was that��icense�ever�demed�orrevoked? � �Yes 4 "'„�' �'�No"�`�� : � � � :_�, �� ,�� y�'; �`^ � , �"��,,�"" ; � a � a �s �, � �� s , t r, v rytFt�*� ��i t . •�+ ex t '�� c'� i +�� !r'x,-3 E '"^� a � �, r°� � .� �. � i � � �4 � 3' �s �„`"9y d �S _;��` < �. r/ y +t ,� (`i � aa � �T a �L t t`srpy � �� +. ^t �f � � � i�,� F1 ;. �,g 3 1 M1K 1.�f 'W� tt �w:�f `�4. ai ._ � 7-si'' 1.��. 1�e5�� ' j�i'r� .�. N��'�y '��'r '" . . - �'.,•+� . �q>. J ° �., ,w� ,�• a r -ti;� �+� � r z�z � - �,�y r a �:4_ � � �rtl.y ,y�r ��.. r � .t'1'`a , r,� .tir�. �� EE ��OWNER �INFORMATION�. as;it�a � ��ea ` a" 'n e' rc��' ert � ��t��e x� ,��'� ti �� ;�<< <��'��"� ��' �� t ` pp �,�s� ' ,.th J P : P y" .) � , {� . , - �,.� 2 R �� _ , , � �: :.,: a,": ' ` �rc Vt l .. �" c '3 �i /��,?'. ;t�: i'�'� (Contract Purchasers: ' Fee Owners m� NAME ' i..° G t�'`I i t� -�: '�� ,ADDRES.S .SO. �'� i C.t�° �; G' i-�C :, ,�� 1Y1,-'�Mik1!'� �i�✓�.�%�"�. I `( '_I r, . � � � � / , �� i. 1 a:.��. a. . y,� �� r; "'k7.: 1 i�+� ��) L,� �i�i �ign this",form pnor to processing � `�, � ., � �� ;: � n ir� �- t� �L�,.�� f' � r ti''/Y�Y'D�.,n `• " �, � „,,,, . ` � . �� ' � , , i'� � ' `; SIGNA' Fee: '$250.00 Permit SAV # � � Application received by: � ,�,� ' Scheduled Planning Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: r�w.�ridi - ✓ - i� � �• II' • Ji i.�,,_ _ _ � ' i� �i 0 ��