PL 11/30/1994 - 6944�
PLANNINQ COM1[I88ION 1dEETINa
W8DN1R8DAY, NOVRMBBR 30, 1994
7 ; 30 P.l�.
PUBLIC COPY
n
�
�
City of Fridley
A G E N D A
PLANNING COMMISSION MTG. WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1994 7:30 P.M.
LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E.
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL•
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: November 2, 1994
PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP 94-
17, BY MICHAEL AND JULIE HELLER•
Per Section 205.24.04 of the Fridley City Code, to allow
construction of a kitchen expansion and repair of an existing
dwelling in the flood fringe district, on Lots 22, 23, and 24,
Block P, Riverview Heights, generally located at 8245 Riverview
Terrace N.E.
CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT L S #94-07, BY PLUNKETT'S PEST
CONTROL.
To redefine Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Great Northern Industrial
Center by moving the joint property line 39 feet east of its
�, current location. The Iegal descriptions for the two lots will
be as follows:
Parcel A: Lot 2 and the West 39 feet of Lot 1, Block
10, Great Northern Industrial Center-Fridley, according
to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Parcel B: Outlot JJ, Outlot II, and that part of Lot
1, Block 10, lying east of the West 39 feet thereof,
Great Northern Industrial Center-Fridley, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.
This property is generally located south of 52nd Way and west of
the Burlington Northern railroad tracks.
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPP'iENT AUTHORITY
MEETING OF OCTOBER 24 1994
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 3, 1994
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER
8, 1994
OTHER BUSINESS•
^ ADJOURNMENT
c
����nr��i
���r�i>!I/ i
,���������:.
e
�
,`"�
�`1
PLANNIN�
CITY OF FRIDLFY
MTs]3TING� NOVEMBLR 2 � 1994
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice-Chairperson Rondrick called the ldovember 2, 1994, Planning
Commission meeting to order at 7z30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Dave Kondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Diane Savage,
Dean Saba
Dave Newman, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig
others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Rick Moseman, Supreme Tool Inc.
Bruce Moseman, Supreme Too1 Inc.
Jeff Holle, Holle Construction Company,
1855 Melrose Avenue S., St. Louis Park, MN
Gene Minea, Minea Realty, 2307 Wentworth,
Minneapolis, NIl�T
John Ryden, C. B. Commercial Real Estate,
4221 Abbott Avenue S., Minneapolis, NIld
Steven Johnson, Ceres Environmental,
2504 W. County Road B, Roseville, NIId
APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 19 1994 PLANNING COMMI_SSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve the
October 21, 1994, Planning Commission minutes as written.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICL-CHAIRPER80N RONDRICR
DECLARLD THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
l.
�y4-u� . tsY t3KUCE MOSEMAN OF SIIPREME TOOL INC. :
To rezone from C-2, General Business, to M-1, Light
Industrial, to allow construction of a manufacturing
facility on Lot 3, Block 1, A& R Second Addition. This
property is generally located north of 7597 Highway #65.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to open the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIIdG AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR.
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE pUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33
P.M.
,—� Mr. Hickok stated the subject parcel is located on Osborne Road,
east of Highway #65. The parcel is north of Kurt Manufacturing.
Zaning on surrounding parcels includes M-1, Light Industrial, to
d w
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. NOVEMBBR 2. 1994 PAGE 2 ^
the south and east; C-2, General Business, ta the north, east and
west; and there is M-1, Light Industrial, and M-4, Mobile Home
Park, to the west across Highway 65.
Mr. Hickok stated the proposal would allow rezoning to Light
Industrial to allow for manufacturing, warehousing and
wholesaling. The site as proposed would be used for the
construction of a 12,000 square foot building measuring 120 feet
x 100 feet. The development has been planned to have adequate
parking, landscape setbacks, building setback, and has taken into
consideration the permitted lot coverage.
Mr. Hickok stated staff uses three criteria in evaluating
rezoning requests:
• District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning.
• District intent.
- Whether or not the use meets the district requirements.
Mr. Hickok stated the M-1 zoning and adjacent uses seem to be
compatible. The intent of the district is for light industrial.
This would an extension of that light industrial use in that area
and is consistent with that intent. The site plan has been
reviewed by staff to determine whether the site coverage,
parking, landscape setbacks, etc., are appropriate.
Mr. Hickok stated, because the rezoning request meets.the
criteria, staff recommends approval with the following
stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit a landscape plan complying with
the district requirements prior to issuance of a building
permit.
2. The petitioner shall comply with the camments in Scott
Erickson's memo dated October 17, 1994, prior to issuance of
a building permit.
Mr. Hickok stated Mr. Erickson has outlined the following:
l. A Storm Pond Maintenance Agreement will need to be recorded
with the property prior to issuance of a building permit.
2. Install rip-rap with filter blanket at the outlet of the
storm water pipe. .
3. Install a flared end section �,rith grate on the end of the
storm�pipe outlet.
�'"1
�
.... . . ... . . ... . ... . .. . ..... . ... ...�. . .._.i.. .....•...�. .�.�.i.���... ..�.._..... . .... . . .. . aa� � .�a � �>.�.. ..�i•�.><�a>ti..a ��aY_�>� ��t>�.� ���>a.KJIN?t>tn�a%KT����>��a�..xTa)awoa�.... < . .i���_. . ... .<...
+ e
�^� PLANNING COMMI88ION �EETING. NOVEI�ER 2, 1994 P�a$ 3
4. Provide a piped outlet to the pond with direct connection to
the existing storm pipe. Provide hydraulic calculations.
The outlet should be s.ize to meter pre-developed flow rates.
5. A Hold Harmless Agreement will be required for any
improvements constructed in easement areas (parking, storm
pond) .
6. The driveway entrance should be constructed to retain all
drainage on-site.
7. Clearly note on the plans the size and type of all existing
utilities.
8. Viron Road has been redesignated as Hwy. 65 East Service
Road. �
9. Provide detailed information for.the hydrology and ponding
calculations (time of concentrat�ion, etc.) How is existing
flow rate greater than the pre-developed? The existing flow
rate calculations should be based on an unimproved grassed
area.
,� .
10. Rice Creek Watershed District approval is required. Provide
copies of approval when obtained.
11. All existing street surfaces shall be kept free of dirt and
debris and shall be swept on a daily basis or as directed by
the City.
12. The building should not be located within any easement
areas.
13. Mountable curb and gutter shall not be used.
14. Provide a rocked entry point to the site during
construction. Show location and detail on the plan.
15. All drainage from the site should be directed to the storm
poind. Sub-catchment 2 should be routed to the pond.
Mr. Oquist asked Mr. Hickok to explain �8 from the memo.
Mr. Hickok stated this road was known in the early plat as Viron
Road and is now known as the Hwy. 65 East Service.Road. This is
a technicality in which staff are asking that road be �eferred to
as Hwy. 65 East Service Road.
'"`� Mr. Oquist questioned �11 and asked why the street needed to be
swept daily.
a a
PLANNING COMMI86ION MEBTING NOVEMBBR 2. 1994 PAG� 4. ^'
Mr. Hickok stated this is required only during the construction
process.
Mr. Oquist requested #11 be revised to include this is to be done
during construction.
Mr. Saba questioned the need for a Hold Harmless Agreement. He
understood this was a condition of an easement. If there was
construction over an easement, the owner is responsible.
Mr. Hickok stated the agreement is a protective document in which
the owner recognizes that, in the event there is a later
correction, the City is not responsible.
Mr. Saba asked if this is something the City will be doing for
every development.
Mr. Hickok stated this has been done on recent developments and
is consistent with what the Puiilic Works staff has recommended in
the past.
Mr. Bruce Moseman stated they have been in business since 1969.
They have been in Fridley since 1981 in Kurt Manufacturing. They ^
currently have 14 employees, and they are a family-owned
corporation. They do 600 of their work for Rurt Manufacturing
which is why this site is handy. It provides access to Rurt to
maintain a good working relationship. They build plastic
injection and die cast molds from steel blocks and machine the
blocks to conform to the customer prints. Some of their
customers include Rurt Manufacturing, Polaris Industries, John
Deere, Digital Computers, etc.
Mr. Kondrick asked if they generate waste or store chemicals.on
the site or in the building.
Mr. Moseman stated no.
Ms. Savage asked if they had any problem with the stipulations.
Mr. Moseman stated no. Most of the stipulations in the memo were
known beforehand and many were included in the site plan.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE oOTE� ALL VOTIN(� AYE� VICE-CHAIRPER80Id RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRILD AND THE PIIBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT 7:48
P.M.
Mr. Oquist stated he has been in Supreme Tool and has seen their
shop. They do need some room. He sees nothing wrong and the
'�� � PLANNINa CO1�iI88ION MEETIN(�. N09EMBER 2. 1994 PAGE 5
stipulations cover the concerns.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recomm.end to the
City Council approval of Rezoning Request, ZOA #94-05, by Bruce
Moseman of Supreme Tool Inc., to rezone from C-2, General.
Business, to M-1, Light Industrial, to allow construction of a
manufacturing facility on Lot 3, Block 1, A& R Second Addition,
generally located north of 7597 Highway #65, with the following
stipulations:
l. The petitioner shall submit a landscape plan complying with
the district requirements prior to issuance of a building
permit.
2. The petitioner shall comply with the comments in Scott
Erickson's memo dated October 17, 1994, prior to issuance of
a building permit.
and, that requirement #il as listed in Scott Erickson's memo
dated October 17, 1994, be revised to read:
il. All existing street surfaces shall be kept free of dirt and
,.� debris and shall be�swept on a daily basis or as directed by
the City during the construction process.
IIPON A VOICE VOTL� ALL VOTINa AYE� VICF-CHAIRPLRSON ROI�TDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Mr. Hickok stated the City Council will establish a public
hearing on November 21 and will hear the request on December 5,
1994.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REOIIEST ZOA
#94-04. BY DAVE McIN'�YRE OF CERES ENVIRONMENTAL:
To rezone from M-2, Heavy Industrial, to M-3, Outdoor
Intensive, Heavy Industrial, to allow the construction of
corporate offices and to allow outdoor storage of materials
and equipment as a principal use on Lots 1& 2, Block 3,
Great Northern Industrial Center East. This property is
generally located east of 5101 Industrial Boulevard, north
of FMC, and adjacent to the Burlington Northern mainline.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(� AYE, VICB-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE pUgI,IC gEARING OPEN AT 7t46
P.M.
� Mr. Hickok stated the request is to rezone the sub'ect
� parcel
from M-2, Heavy Industrial, to M-3, Heavy Industrial Outdoor
PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETING. NOVEMHBR 2. 1994 PAaB 6 �
Intensive. Both are heavy industrial districts; however, the M-3
is designed to accommodate heavy industry with outdoor intensive
activities. The subject parcel is located within the Great
Northern Industrial Center and the zoning in that center is M-2,
Heavy Industrial. The zoning to the east covers the properties
along Main Street which are M-2, Heavy Industrial.
Mr. Hickok stated the property is to the west of the rail-�iine
and is a long narrow parcel. The request would allow rezoning
for Ceres Environmental. The site plan includes an office
building which would be the location of their administrative and
office complex and the location for maintenance of their heavy
equipment. Ceres provided copies of photographs of the types of
equipment to be stored on this site. The office portion of the
building is two-story with 3840 square feet. There are 6,400
square feet in the maintenance complex located to the rear of the
building.
Mr. Hickok stated staff inet with the petitioner early in the
planning process and determined, because of the size of the
building and intensity of storage outdoors, an M-3 zoning would
be appropriate for this request. Initially, the petitioner
looked at the site and, based on the site dimensions, the size of �
the building required and the use, felt this was an adequate
site. It is the outdoor storage activities that have driven the
M-3 requirement.
Mr. Hickok stated, in May, 1992, the City Council debated the
creation of the M-3 district. At that time, there was much
discussion about what the M-3 district would be used for and what
impacts that would have on the existing M-1 and M-2 districts.
It was believed that creating the M-3 district would allow the
opportunity for those who wanted M-3 industrial uses that were
not covered under the M-2 and special use permit for outdoor
storage. Screening could be difficult because of the large
equipment or other activities related to outdoor storage.
Therefore, the M-3 district was deemed necessary. As part of
that discussion, the City determined that the sites appropriate
for M-3 zoning were in the northern portion of the City. This
area centers around Hickory Street north of 81st.
Mr. Hickok stated Ceres Environmental is an environmental
consultant with clients throughout the metropolitan area and
throughout the country. Their services include fuel tank removal
and replacement, construction/demolition, recycling of timber,
snow removal, and general tree service (trimming, dead tree
removal, etc.) Ceres has a number of locations. This would be
the site for office and maintenance uses. Ceres has a site in
Maple Grove for wood recycling. They are the Hennepin County ,�
contractor for this activity. They are also the City of
Minneapolis contractor for snow removal and much of the large
"� PLANNING CO1rIl►�SISSION Mg$TINa, NOVEMB$R 2, 1994 P�d$ 7
equipment related to the snow removal would
site. Ceres felt the proximity of the site
Minneapolis is important and that this is a
other M-3 available in the community.
be stored on the
to downtown
preferred site to
Mr. Hickok stated there are three criteria used in determining
whether rezoning is appropriate. The first is the compatibility
with adjacent uses. To the north, there is M-2, Heavy
Industrial, (Minikahda Mini Storage) which is an industrial self-
storage facility with indoor storage and asphalt driving aisles
and parking surfaces. To the east, there is M-2, Heavy
Industrial, along Main Street. Closest to th�is site would be the
rear portion of those sites. To the south is also M-2, Heavy
Industrial, including Quebecor and FMC. These are large
buildings with incidental outdoor storage. To the west, is the
Perlman Rocque transfer facility for restaurants, including
McDonald's. There is outdoor truck/trailer activity which is
limited to incidental traffic related to the principal use on
site.
Mr. Hickok stated the second criteria is the district intent.
The intent of the M-3 is to allow heavy industrial uses and
,—� outdoor storage. This proposal would be consistent with M-3
zoning and would be dependent on the outdoor storage.
�
`Mr. Hickok stated the third criteria is the district regulations.
The proposed site plan meets the intent and meets the M-3 zoning
regulations. The building is centrally located. There�is
landscaping to the north and to the south. There is a storage
yard with crushed gravel or compacted fill area. There is also
hard surface of concrete and asphalt. The petitioner has asked
for consideration of the crushed gravel because of the weight of
the equipment and materials to be stored outside. �
Mr. Hickok stated the recommendation falls back to a policy
issue. Approval would allow an M-3 parcel that would be
surrounded by M-2 uses. The site has an elongated shape that
backs up to the railroad tracks. To the rear of the property
the rear areas of the industrial uses to the east. Staff
recommends, based pn the evaluation of the criteria, that the
Commission.recommend denial of the rezoning request due to the
incompatibility of the M-3 district with the other M-2 uses.
the Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval,'staff
recommends the following stipulations:
1.
2.
is
If
Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Great Northern Industrial Center East
shall be consolidated as one tax parcel.
The parking area shall include signs and surface striping to
identify a one-way circulation pattern.
� ..
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETINt3. NOVEMBLR 2. 1994 PA�3E 8 �
3. A five-foot setback for landscaped area must be established
along the eastern property line, running from the north to
the south property lines.
4. Irrigation shall be installed in the front and side yards.
5. The landscape plan shall be modified to include additional
plantings for seasonal color and screening. This plan shall
be reviewed and approved by City staff.
6. Additional berms and landscaping shall be added to the site
plan north of the gravel parking area indicated on the plat
(south of the storm water pond).
7. The petitioner shall comply with the Engineering Department
requirements specified in Scott Erickson's memo dated
October 28, 1994.
8. All surfaces intended for drives or parking/storage of
equipment shall be surfaced with concrete or asphalt.
Mr. Hickok referred to stipulation #7 in which Mr. Ericks�on's
memo lists the following Engineering Department requirements: �
1. A Storm Pond Maintenance Agreement will need to be recorded.
with the property prior to issuance of a building permit.
2. Al1 drive areas shall be hard surfaced and have concrete
curb and gutter.
3. The driveway entrance shall be constructed to retain all
drainage on site. �
4. Grade the site to one ponding location.
5. Provide concrete blocking for all watermain piping bends.
Note on the plan the amount of blocking to be installed.
6. Install rip-rap with filter blanket at the storm pipe
outlet.
7. Install flared ends and trash guards on all storm pipe ends.
8. Clearly note all pipes sizes, types of material, and class
of materials being proposed.
9. A minimum of.7 feet of cover is required to the top of all
service lines. Is this achieved? Clearly note service
depths on the plan. �
10. Provide a detail of the plans for the baffled weir outlet.
��' PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETI�a. NOVEMHER 2. 1994 PAGE 9
il. Show all existing and proposed invert elevations.
12. Install a manhole at the bend of the 6-inch sanitary service
line. �
13. Install a gate valve on the 6-inch service line.
14. Note on the plans that all street surfaces shall be kept
free of dirt and debris and shall be swept on a daily basis
or as directed by the City.
15. Provide a rocked entry point to the site. Show location and
detail on the plan.
16. Clearly identify locations of silt fence installation.
Provide a detail on the plan.
17. Provide hydrology, hydraulic, ponding calculations and all
related information and assumptions.
18. Additional information may be requested.
^ Mr. Saba stated the proposal is for a service and maintenance
facility. Will there also be junk or salvage vehicles on the
property?
Mr. Hickok stated his understanding is that vehicles will be
there for maintenance and that their typical vehicles for
operation will be stored there. He did not believe any salvage
vehicles would be on the property.
Ms. Savage asked if the petitioner was looking at the site.
Mr. Hickok stated they are looking at the site and have not
established that at their location. �
Ms. Savage asked if there had been any discussion with staff
about this company locating in the M-3 zone.
Mr. Hickok stated yes. One of the items highlighted was the
proximity with Minneapolis with their snow removal activities.
Mr. Rondrick asked if fencing was discussed.
Mr. Hickok stated yes. Screening plans as indicated on the
elevations would include a chain link fence with privacy
screening slats to screen those elements to be stored outside.
There is also an undulating berm with landsca�ing to soften the
� inipact of that screening fence.
Mr. Kondrick asked if this is speaking to fencing the entire
. .,.,. . .................... . . . . . . n>.o•:>.r.:�:,:.:..,��„n..:.:,:.:,:i>.:•;:n;�.>aai.irnn�n�,,:�><:noua:a: �.: <...,,, ,.•,.tx�
e .
PLANNING COMMISBION MEETIN(3, NOVEMBBR 2. 1994 PAG�E 10
property.
Mr. Hickok stated there would be screening for all areas where
storage of materials could be seen from adjacent properties or
the public right-of-way.
Mr. Steven Johnson, business manager for Ceres Environmental,
stated the company has been in business for 17 years. The size
of the company and gross revenues are currently about $5 million.
They employ 15-30 people. Some positions are seasonal. They are
looking at this property for their headquarters and maintenance
facility. The amount of equipment stored would be very limited
on this parcel. They have a 10-acre facility in Maple Grove
where they operate year-round recycling activities. That
particular operation has achieved national acclaim. As �ar as he
knows, the operation is looked at kindly and is a clean
operation. They do not intend to move these activities to this
site. There seems to be some misconception as to the amount of
storage to occur on the property. There is not going to be a
great amount due to the size of the property. About 800 of the
equipment is stored on the job locations, which could be metro,
regional or in other states. At the most, 20�5 would be at this
location and only at the time it is being serviced or if it is
for seasonal use.
Mr. Johnson stated, in reference to the question as to whether
another M-3 site would work, there are limitations. Concerns
include access and closeness to downtown. The type of snow
removal they do is for substantial commercial properties in
downtown locations where the snow is hauled off-site and disposed
of. This particular location would provide quick access to both
freeways. The time difference in mobility and travel time
compared to the other zones would be detrimental to their snow
removal operations. It does not seem like a long way but with
repeated trips it adds up significantly.
Mr. Johnson stated he would like to reinforce that the company
would be a good neighbor. The intent is to comply with the
recommendations of staff. He is concerned about the stipulation
to require a paved service for the entire storage area. A lot of
the equipment has tracks which is not compatible with paved or
concrete surfaces. It is very hard on those surfaces and the.
investment put into that surface on a repeated basis would have a
significant impact. They have enough space to accommodate the
equipment that is there on a regular basis. The concrete surface
in the shop needs to be 10 inches thick. There is also a
substantial paved area in the front. They have every intention
to make the site attractive. They want to attract and maintain
good employees. Some of the limits of a contractor are the looks
of the yard. Part of their corporate image is to convey that
image with the property.
, \
�
�
�"1,
,�
PLANNING COI�IIBSION MEETIN(�. NOVSMBER 2, 1994 PA6E 11
Mr. Rondrick asked, in lieu of a concrete or asphalt storage
yard, what surface would they propose. �
Mr. Johnson stated the surface would be an improved surface with
crushed rock. This would be within a fenced area and screened
from view. Maintenance is done annually or as needed.
Mr. Johnson stated, to provide an idea of their need and concern,
they are currently located on Hwy. 280. They have surfaces there
that are concrete and asphalt installed a number of years ago to
handle heavy equipment. Their use on that particular property
has deteriorated that surface in a few years. They want to make
the investment for an apron but it is not practical in the
storage yard where equipment is stored.
Mr. Rondrick asked if they would be changing oil or have any
contaminants that would seep into the soil in the storage yard.
Mr. Johnson stated maintenance would be done on the concrete
apron and in the shop itself. There would be no activities as
described on the gravel surfaces. Ceres is an environmental
contractor so they have that concern. Their main contractor is
the government to do clean up. They have a good track record and
are a conscientious environmental contractor. He did not think
there would be any problems.
Mr. Oquist asked if they would be storing and maintaining the
equipment as shown in the provided materials except when it is on
the job site.
Mr. Johnson stated this building would be the main garage. For
major repairs, equipment would come here.
Mr. Rondrick stated the company specializes in the removal of
storage tanks. Would any of tiiose removed items to be stored on
this site?
Mr. Johnson stated no. Those items are dealt with on the site or
hauled directly to a disposal facility. New installations are
normally sent to the site. They have had occasions where tanks
were delivered before they were ready to install and needed to be
stored in the yard.
Mr. Johnson stated their hours of operation are from 7:30 a.m. to
6:00 p.m. During snow removal, they are a 24-hour operation and
would be dispatching crews out of that area during snow falls.
That operation is a bit unique. The type of work requires heavy
equipment. That equipment would be interimly staged at this
�� facility.
Mr. Kondrick asked if welding would be done inside.
� . w .. . . .. . . . . . . . �... ... . . . . . . . ......., . . _..e ..,.�,t>:,, . . ,,., .. . .. . ., ,,,.,.., e � .�.�. . . . . :.iee,:,. . . . . . , . ,vo�
�
PLANNING COMMI86ION MESTIN(3. NOVEMBEIt 2, 1994 PAGL 12
Mr. Johnson stated a welding bay would be in the shop. They want
to have four service bays. One of those would be a drive through
for tractor/trailer rigs. Al1 of those maintenance activities
would be done indoors.
Mr. Kondrick stated one of the items that was of concern to staff
was the company comply with the memo dated October 28, 1994, from
Mr. Erickson regarding the drainage and grading review. Were
there any questions?
Mr. Johnson stated they have reviewed. They have no problems or
concerns in complying. They asked staff to come to another
location that would be very similar in type, use and construction
to what is being proposed. It was typical and indicative of the
facility they propose.
Mr. Hickok stated the facility is Bel Air Excavating in New
Brighton located northwest of the intersection of Hwy. 10 and 96.
Staff looked at the site and also had an opportunity to see the
crushed compacted or recycled surface. It gave staff a chance to
see a site like this in operation. It is a very nice site.
Mr. Kondrick stated staff has recommended denial of the request. �.
If the Commission recommends approval of the request, staff
recommends eight stipulations. With the exception of stipulation
#8 regarding the surface in the storage area, are you in
agreement with the remaining stipulations as submitted?
Mr. Johnson stated they would be able to comply with all except
#8. They would request a gravel surface.
Mr. John Ryden provided photos of the site including aerial
photos. He felt this company was as good a use as one would see
on this property. He does not think one wouid see a use more in
line with the M-2 zoning. The use will be M-3 primarily because
of the location, dimensions and terrain. It is across the street
from where there are semi-trailers backed up to the street. The
other side is along the railroad tracks. The lot is very narrow
so it would be difficult to get a bigger building on the site.
The property lends itself to outdoor storage use. The typieal
company looking to construct a building with no storage would not
want this site. They would want a different view. This is the
reason Ceres picked the site. It is somewhat hidden from the
main traffic lines.
Mr. Kandrick asked if the streets in that area can support the
weight of this equipment. Can they get back to the property with•
this equipment?
n
Mr. Johnson stated the streets are wide enough and are adequate.
That was a limitation on the how to develop t�e site. They had
, �
�� PLANNING COMMISBION MEETING. NOVEMB$R 2. 1994 PA�E 13
to have the architect design it so they could get sufficient
turning radius for a tractor/trailer rig onto the property. They
accomplished that with a drive through bay within the building
and one way routing in and out of the site.
Mr. Hickok stated the streets in this industrial district are of
a heavier grade with this use in mind.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Oquist, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICS-CHAIRPLRSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE pIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8525
P.M.
Mr. Saba asked if they would need a variance for stipulation #8.
Mr. Hickok stated yes. The surface requirement could be brought
back for the appeals process.
Mr. Oquist stated, as he recalled, a similar discussion came up
with Park Construction where they did not need the hard surface.
^ �ir. Hickok stated this is a discretionary decision on the part of
staff to decide which items go through the appeals process.
Ultimately, all have to go through the City Council. There have
been items that the Council has acted on independent of the
Appeals Commission.
Ms. Savage asked if the City had received any objections to the
request.
Mr. Hickok stated staff has not received any negative calls
regarding this request.
Mr. Oquist stated this seems to be a good use of the property and
this is an environmental consulting company. He would like to
strike stipulation #8. He does not think this requirement would
work for this intended use.
Ms. Savage stated she had concern about establishing a precedent
for moving the M-3 zoning but she was persuaded that this company
would be an asset to the City. Because of the particular area,
she did not think it would be a detriment.
Mr. Kondrick agreed. This use would suit the area.
Mr. Saba stated there could be worse companies than this for M-3.
^ He did not see a problem. He thought it would be handled well.
He would like to see stipulation �8 go through the appeals
process and then to the City Council. He has no problem with the
PLANNINa CO1�iIB8ION MEETINQ, NOVEMBER 2, 1994� PAG$ 14
curbs but the surface is not right for this type of operation.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend approval
of Rezoning Request, ZOA #94-94, by Dave McIntyre of Ceres
Environmental, to rezone from M-2, Heavy Industrial, to M-3,
Outdoor Intensive, Heavy Industrial, to allow the construction of
corporate offices and to allow outdoor storage of materials and
equipment as a principal use on Lots 1& 2, Block 3, Great
Northern Industrial Center East, generally located east of 5101
Industrial Boulevard, north of FMC, and adjacent to the
Burlington Northern mainline, with the following stipulations:
1.
2.
Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Great Northern Industrial Center East
shall be consolidated as one tax parcel.
The parking area shall include signs and surface striping to
identify a one-way circulation pattern.
3. A five-foot setback for landscaped area must be established
along the eastern property line, running.from the north to
the south property lines.
4. Irrigation shall be installed in the front and side yards.
5. The landscape plan shall be modified to include additional
plantings for seasonal color and screening. This plan shall
be reviewed and approved by City staff.
6. Additional berms and landscaping shall be added to the site
plan north of the grave7 parking area indicated on the plat
(south of the storm water pond).
7. The petitioner shall comply with the Engineering Department
requirements specified in Scott Erickson's memo dated
October 28, 1994.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPLR80N RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRISD IINANIMOIISLY.
Mr. Hickok stated the City Council would on November set the date
for the public hearing. The public hearing would be held on
December 5, with the final decision made on December 19.
3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF
OCTOBER 25, 1994
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the
Appeals Commission minutes of October 25, 1994.
IIPON A VOICE VOTL� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CBAIRPBRSON RONDItICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
��
�
�"1
. s
�"1 PLANNINQ COMMI88ION ME$TINa. NOVBMBBR 2. 199� PAGE 15
ADJOURNMENT �
MOTIOAT by Mr. .Oq�ist, � seconded by Ms.. S�avage, to adjourn �the � �
meeting. �
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPER80N RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIBD AND THE NOVEMBER 2, 1994, PLANNING
COMMI88ION MEETING ADJOIIRNED AT 8:33 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
r
i L: � �V � � '� i �( � f���
Lavonn Cooper
Recording Secretary
�
�^j.,
. � �
S I G N— IN S H E E T
PLANNING COMMISSION.MEETING, Wedaesda.y, November 2, 1994
�"1
�
�
�
P
1
Staff Report
SP #94-17, by Michael and Julie Heller
Page 2
**3tipulation** The petitioner shall submit an elevation
certificate verifying the first floor
elevation of the dwellinq. and the breezeway.
The City typically requires the petitioner to execute and record
against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City
from liability for issuing the special use permit.
**Stipulation** The petitioner shall euecute and record
aqainst the property a hold harmless
agreement releasinq the City from liability.
The Engineering Department has requested a 15 foot flood control,
street, and utility easement along the west property line for the
improvement of Riverview Terrace.
*�Stipulation+�* The petitioner shall qrant a 15 foot flood
control, street, and utility easement along
the west property line.
RECOMMENDATION/STIPIILATION3:
The request complies with the requirements of the CRP-2 District.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval
of the request to the City Council with the following
stipulations:
l. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate
verifying the firsic floor elevation of the dweliing and the
breezeway.
2.
3.
The.petitioner shall execute and record against the property
a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability.
The petitioner shall grant a 15 foot flood control, street,
and utility easement along the west property line.
''
�
�
�
a a
�
SP ��94-17
Michael & Julie Heller
City of Coon Rapids
c•� � c�, ��� s�
T35 � �� �25 �,.� Q�. �
I s 1 (� l l.a�� ►�W "'
V:� v'�� � 600
g� �
t`) � ��� �m1 (�l
ba>> S�,ree , �, � � � ,
� `�'�
� .� s,
� � ,� � ��� � � � � p�� ��to
�'� ��� c�� •
�
,
,—� � � � ��� c�� �� �
� ! � ? �e S�'T�� c �QO�
� i�'� ari
� t � � ' a {�� ��;s�
� tK>>
�; ��e�vi�le � ��,
� �� �
�- ��y i��
tn . c �
� i� c ���
�- p3 .
� ��� m]
�� � �
I�1 5��
�
l�l
� �►� i�) �1 � 56
��
4
�� c��
�
c�� t5�'� � �
�
��'� _
� 671 5`�,� p0 r�
�
�� �� c � �n � i,� � �szo� `�� �
�
i'
L
co
�
t�i
0
�
664 t �! ps P+ � �
�' � p� � � �-�3
� i680� `�' � (�1 � 7 � ��� � 6155
�
�� �! ta:� � t �
6�1! � �
l�l �� � �9
� l�� O �� � ��� � (�I
I 1 Li �m� � *�l
l�l �� �
� (�, t l ��� �� 601
�' ��� � 4 � ��� ��m)
lml �
,� ,.
.�
' :., ;:r., , �,
� : .,
,, �,
� ;�r.,
�' .� � � �
,� ,:,
, � ,�
�r-
., , , , �
1 �'�' _���
�6�
l �1
�, �
N
l
LOCATION MAP
SP 4�94-17 r
Michael & Julie Heller
: � �= �. ..._ �'� ..� ...... ���
DISTRICT
N-1 ONE FANILY OWG'S �
p-4 TWO FPMILY OWG'S �
N-3 GEN YULTIPLE DWO'S �
R-4 MOBILE NOME VAflR �
1
V PUBLIC I! C���TIES J
C-1 LOC4L BUS�MESS �
C-1 GFhER4L BUS�NESS �+�
C-J GEME4aL SMOPVING �'�
C-H/ GENE9AL JFFI('E —J
`\ \ � �
a
M-1 LIOXT INDUSTRIAI ❑
11-1 NEAVY INOUSTRIAI �
PUD PLpNNED UNIT DEV. �
S-1 NYDE PRHK NEICNBOFHO00 ❑
S-I HEOEVELOPMENT OISTRICT � �
O-1 CHEEK 6 flIVER PRESEHVAT�ON �
O-2 CHITICAL pNEA L'j
VAGA7ED STNEETS .�J
���'�� ■V.Y Y�
� �
H
a REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
�
� 7601- 73rd Avenue North 560-3093
'� Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
�
y, �uruP�ur� f�pr�ifutt#e
a
�
��
�
, . — �24.4q-
.r�O, � -
�� �
m: -
�i � �
�� �
I �/ ,
,,
'� J
N
� --, ±-
�_ � '
�i¢.�q
SP ��94-17
Michael & Julie Heller
. . �, ,
,�. �,
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
, o �.
,
0
U1
N
.. ___ __ __�_-� �� - -1 � '
_ :$ '''�° ° °
,—" p O
__ .1 � � FI oo r CIeV. �,
� _. gZ�•� �' - m E �
r/ � 2a.0
3.3o JY ° B�4-s � � O 1
° 0 HOUSE _
, . GARAG� _ _ ., (•� �
m,,,N _ ?_ �_ I
1 �mi �
� r {� �.� � � . 0
, � dS �__ ... �.' � � ` • . - �i [D
I
S� I -I � a '
# �� � V'!
: - � -� - � io.s ADDITION `,
Z2, a . . .
-� � _ i�_�• ��_ _-
%°� _ _
/3Z.So
� _ .
_-_ J L�Nc-svtLL� . �i �`�� �° : N.�. ..
! ots 22, 23, and 24; E31ock P, P.IVERYIEU HEIG}�TS P.DDITION
T
N
Because of the three season porch location in relation to the river and flood fringe area,
changing its use to year round residential living space requires a special use permit.
S1TE PLAtV
Notice is hereby
Fridley Planning
University Avenue
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
given that there will be a public hearing of the
Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431
N.E. on Wednesday, November 30, 1994 at 7:30
p.m. for the purpose of:
Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP
#94-17, by Michael and Julie Heller, per
Section 205.24.04 of the Fridley City Code,
to allow construction of a kitchen expansion
and repair of an existing dwelling in the
flood fringe district, on Lots 22, 23, and
24, Block P, Riverview Heights, generally
located at 8245 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require
auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no
later than November 23, 1994.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard
opportunity at the above stated time and
related to this item may be referred to
Development Department at 572-3592.
Publish: November 15, 1994
November 22, 1994
shall be given an
place. Any questions
the Fridley Community
DAVID NEWMAN
CHAIR
PLANNING COMMI5SION
�
�
/"1
. �
�SP �94-17
Michael and
Julie Heller
�
.. _.:hael & Julie Heller
8245 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Spadgenske/Dreyer
670 Ironton Street
Fridley, MN 55432
Mailing List
John Kennedy
8199 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, NIld 55432
David Hagemeister
NE 6608 Quebec North
Minneapolis, MN 55428
Robert and Jane Dirkes
680 Ironton Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Kathleen Larson
677 Ironton Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
David & Jean Wudinich
� Ironton Street NE
r�idley, MN 55432
Thomas Shupien
680 Janesville Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Eleanor Hanson
648 Janesville Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Michael & Rita Curtis
689 Janesville Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Larry and Elaine Harris.
651 Janesville Street NE
F..�dley, MN 55432
Thomas Brandl
664 Ironton Street NE
Fridley, NIl�T 55432
Marie Gable
671 Ironton Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Chris & Carol Milner
633 Ironton Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Arlene Andrea
670 Janesville Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
David & Rita Williams
634 Janesville Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Richard & Mary Smith
8275 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Current Resident
641 Janesville Street NE
Fridley, NIl�T 55432
Mailed: 10/27/94
Igor and Robin Woyno
8181 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, IMIl�T 55432
Thomas & Raren Zemlin
690 Ironton Street NE
Fridley, NIIJ 55432
Dennis & Eloise Roelke
8215 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Mary Rociemba
665 Ironton Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert Mikulak
8241 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Rudolph & Carol Kalan
654 Janesville St. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Donald Olson
699 Janesville St. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Gary & Kathleen Hanning
679 Janesville St. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Scott & Tamara Roselius
631 Janesville St. NE
Fridley, NII�T 55432
-Ron�ld & Shirley Watson
8295 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Paul Westby
666 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Steven & Judy Luppino
634 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Daniel and Joanne Fay
729 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
David Kociemba
635 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
�
Stanley & Patricia Barone Suzanne Egan
686 Kimball Street NE 676 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432
John & Hassman Hinnekamp
656 Kimball Street NE.
Fridley, MN 55432
Leonard & Clynell Moore
8301 Riverview Terr. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Russell Tenney
725 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
David Newman
Planning Comm. Chair
7635 Alden Way NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Lavonne Broberg r�
646 Kimball Street N:
Fridley, MN 55432
Current Resident
735 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, NIN 55432
Dennis & Veronica Hamre
655 Kimball Street NE
Fridley, MN 55432
City Council Members
�
�"1
. .�
�
0
,,� CITY OF FRIDLEY
� 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55�32
��
�
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Address: g�`� i/.phl
Property Identificarion Number
Legal description:
�t Block
Current zoning; ,
�easo,� fo� speci,�l use nerffiit �
c
Il� - site plan required for submittal; see attached
,c� �I�f (.� 1�x� /�� 1��i
x�
I � � �
� � ` � ��(�P_-!'`�%�� -�.1'` -
TracdAddition
_ Square footage/acreage �D �o'�
�- -' w-' �' �1 /�L�! Sectidh of City Code: ���(�
Have you operate b siness in a ciry which required a business license?
Yes No If yes, which city?
If yes, what type of business?
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes Nn
�
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
IvAME %i1 �.• 11�,� _f �r>�,.� !�• L /,� l �� � �'�
NAME
t�j ll
SIGNA'
0
a
DAYTIME PHONE�
DATE ��- ,-��
�e��Z��.r � • � � • ���i���
����� � � �
_ :...._�- _ �
Fee: $400.00 $100.00 for 'dential2nd accessory buildings
Permit SP # � Receipt # _ ��
� Application receive by:
Scheduled Planning Commission date: _ �06�f'�'Yl ���"` �(� , i % % �
Scheduled City Council date:
�
STAFF REPORT
Community Development Department
AppeaLs Commission Date
Planning Commission Date :
City Council Date
November 30, 1994
APPLICATION NIIMBER:
Lot�Split Request, L.S. �94-07
PETITIONER:
Brian Tucker, Petitioner, Plunkett's Pest Control
Trillium Corporation, Pentas, Ow�er
LOCATION•
This property is generally located south of 52nd W�y, east of
Industrial Boulevard.
x�ouEST-
To allow a lot split/reconfiguration of two currently platted
industrial parcels.
ANALYSIS•
Plunkett's Pest Control has proposed a building for Lot 2, Block
10, Great Northern Industrial Center. Lot 2 contains 1..69 acres.
The restrictive covenants for the Great Northern Industrial
Center require a minimum of a two acre site.
Code Section 205.18.03.A requires a minimum 7.ot area of T 1/2
acres. Great Northern development covenants exceed the minimum,
standard set by the City of Fridley. The request is to configure
Lots l and 2, Block 10, .is a result of the deficienc� in lot size
in accordance with covenant requir.ements. Lot 1 contains 2.38
acres currently.
By moving the common lot line (between Lots 1 and 2) 39 feet
east. Both lots will meet the minimum two acre development
standard. Lot 1 will contain 2.07 acres and Lot 2 will contain
two acres.
The Plunkett building/site design consists of a 12,000 square
foot building footprint, 30 par•king spaces, and a rear screened
storage area. .
Details of the building are being completed and are not available
for full review at this time.
Staff Report
L.S. #94-07, by Plunkett's Pest Control
Page 2
**Btipulation** All buildinq and site desiqn standards shall
meet or exceed the code requirements of the
• M-2 zoninq district.
Great Northern Industrial Center was originally platted in 1968.
The plat included 106 acres. The East River Road Business
Center, Wickes, Perlman Rocque, and many other
industrial/business structures were later developed.
In 1985, an additiona1�12.4 acres were platted and a majority
that plat is occupied by the Minikahda Warehouse storage
facility. The 12.4 acre portion lies adjacent to and west of
Burlington Northern main rail line. Both the first and second
phase of the Great Northern Industrial Center development
required a two acre minimum lot size.
�
the
The placement of roads and lot dimension requirement of adjacent
industrial properties caused Lot 2 to be reduced to a substandard
dimension.
���Stipulation** A new survey shall be prepared showing the
correct site confiquration of Lots 1 and 2,
Block 10, Great Northern Industrial Center.
*�Stipulation** The lot split shall be recorded with the
Anoka County Recorder�s Office prior to
� issuance of a building permit for either Lot
1 or Lot 2, Block 10, Great Northern
Industrial Center.
**3tipulation** The cost of any modifications to the
utilities related to this reconfiquration
shall be the sole expense of the property
owner or successor for both Lots 1 an8 2,
Block 10, Great Northern Industrial Center.
�*Stipulation** Park dedication fees shall be paid at a rate
of $.023 per square foot of land. Dedication
fees shall be paid at the time of buildinq
permit issuance for each of Lots 1 and 2,
Block 10, Great Northern Industrial Center.
RECOMMENDATIONLSTIPIILATIONS:
Staff recommends'approval of
Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Great
following stipulations:
F
�
�
the lot split/reconfiguration of
Northern Industrial Center with the ^
�
,� Staff Report
L.S. #94-07, by Plunkett's Pest Control
Page 3
1. All building and site design standards shall meet or exceed
the code requirements of the M-2 zoning district.
2. A new survey shall be prepared showing the correct site
configuration of Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Great Northern
Industrial Center.
3. The lot split shall be recorded with the Anoka County
Recorder's Office prior to issuance of a building permit for
either Lot 1 or Lot 2, Block 10, Great Northern Industrial
Center.
4. The cost of any modifications to the utilities related to
this reconfiguration shall be the sole expense of the
property owner ar successor.for.both Lots 1 and 2, Block 10,
Great Northern Industrial Center.
5. Park dedication fees shall be paid at a rate of $.023 per
square foot of land. Dedication fees shall be paid at the
time of building permit issuance far each of Lots 1 and 2,
Block 10, Great Northern Industrial Center.
�
,--,
L.S. ��94-07 , ,
Plunkett's Pest.Control
; N//2 SEC. 27, T. 30, R. 2 4
1 � C/TY OF � FR/OLEY
�
i 2 � ; t�
; h
' } _°; 21 W
� , ..
. �,, � f
� ° e. N W CORNER '� �•i i so �f+'r lr .
HCJ i1 �� SfC.?T � O'�• �� I
� '-�- - - 7-- ... .... ° f+�•• ' "" ' - �L ,• ,__ -
: �� � � r y: -�,�_-
�c� � /'�'.. 2 :IQ� � ... '..-OUTLOT DD {... ��`�� •'� '
� cREAr ,� � „ �
; %`,-` ti .� � NORTHERN ' , ° Z . i �.�.
J � � 1 F��C i ... ' a2� L_�
:re�_�
�%
sow�
' I
1
I
1.
1
.�
Y.
. �
� 1
6 i
�
d .eC
RSi; 1
/ i
!
S/.IJ AC.
J�>
..�, .
J '� '
� � �
1 '.�
1 1
-- i -�-
,n . ,
:
�r', i _ j � �
;
�:�„ � � 1', I
��:};.
4 ' ;
.i.'� :�i
: rP! i !', �.1' �1'�
� �.
-_-----1" ,1��
1�\
j �o���
' • �
�' � R
� �\� _. F._ .�... sec z�
• ����
! 31'�
L,'i� � �. _. _. ! I!/• . _ _
�
��
, �„
•I
�
�
t
r.
y.: '_ __'
I �� I I�4
� � i
I �E
�.
1 � li
� ;: ,iI,M
� � �.`,
; - ., �i--•- -
I,
� :�
�� ��
� 2
O
:I F
2
�I I ? '
��
111 /�
-I-
�
L4CATIOtV MAP
�,
�1
�
�Fr' ��
��� �
; ;
3�� `
.., �� �
:��� �
,� �
� �
�
e '' �
S �
Y♦
r
�
11
J
f `� �
��;
�J
:� :�r�
lfii -`l
/`�`
� ��.
/ �
1�
/���i-y�
%� .�
„� �
P �%
,�
r,
v
��/ :�� •��
:'/J: �-.
%
;�•�-�- ..
� � ��
.��f � �� •��
�% /
� ry
r�
.
�� lP
� � �/f:
; 1 �'"'� � �
./-�- J,,� -�,i
�,,�/%`�i
�%' ' �� � � rJ' � �
l�,..��!�JL_/
�.
�
.
�
.,
�
�•
�
�
�
/.'
�
,�
- - -- - -- -
t�1
52nd �ap
� �1)
(4i)
OW
.�Z. -
W �.
�' ~
.� W
�����a
H�
aa
� �.
Oy
�
��
��
�
��
�
'� = Existing Lot Lir�s
c++�
�(�—� = Proposed Lot Line Shift
�
` � �.._.____..._
(is)
L.S. ��94-07
Plunkett's Pest Control
a�
�
w
y
�
0
�
-�
tu)
.�
�
�
�
�,
0
�
0
�
e.o
�
..--�
.--�
�
�
�
. I I T
A LOT SPLTT (RECONFIGURATIOl� HAS BEII�T REQUESTED TO ADD .31
ACRES TO A LOT THAT C:L:IRRENTLY DOES NOT MEET TI� 2 ACRE N
r�IlTTIMUM STANDARD ESTABLISHED BY TI� INDUSTRIAL PARK
OWNERS.
EXISTING/PROPOSED
� ,
52ND WAY
�
�
�.�
��-���.-------------
- �
N
� SITE PLAN �
A1 SCALE: 1°= 20'0" 0 10' 20' 10'
L.S. ��94-07
Plunkett's Pest Control
--------p
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
i
�
,
;
I
�
,
-__- - -=-�
SITE PLAN
CB COMMERCIAL
REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC.
BROKERAGEAND MANAGEMENT
BROKERAGESERVICES
LICENSED REAL FSTATE BROKER
October 5, 1994
Ms. Barbara Dacy
Community Development Director
C1TY OF FRIDLEY
6432 University Avenue
Fridley, MN 55432
RE: PitOZ�c�rivE CovIIVaNrs
G�aT NoRT�rr INnusrRrAL C�rr�u
Dear Barbara.:
���
COMMERCIAL
Loca! Perspective Worldwide �'\
� �
FOUNDED I�X16
Enclosed is a copy of the De�laration of Protective Covenants and a subsequent Amendment
for the Great Northern Industrial Center park. Per our discussion, it appears that Plunkett's
may not be able to build a facility in the park due to the two acre minimum requirement �
described in Section 11 of this document.
As I understand it, our options are to increase the size of the project to two acres or obtain
consent from the owners of at least 60 % of the land in the pazk. The Plunkett's aze not willing
to purchase additional land and we are not sure that we actually have a 4+ acre parcel to work
with. Also, I am not confident that a petition to the owners of 60% of the acreage would be
successful.
Barbara, we would appreciate any suggestions or insight you may have.
Sincerely,
���
John M. Ryden
Associate
(612) 924-4641
cbL028jmr
Enclosure
7760 FRANCG AVENUE SOU'fH, SUITE 770, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435-5282
/"�
a
w
• +�
�
���� ���� �� ���� ����
E. Nuclear processing or storage facilities.
F. Gas fired foundries_
G. Asbestos marnifacturing facilities.
H. Trucking Terminals (Ref. Ord. 995)
I. Uses whose principal operation requires the outdoor storage
of materials, motor vehicles, or equipment, including the outdoor
manipulation of said materials, motor vehicles, or equipment.
(Ref. Ord. 995)
3. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
A. Lot Area.
A lot area of not less than one and one-half (1-1/2) acre is
required for one (1) main building.
B. Lot Width.
A lot width of 150 feet is required at the required front setback.
C. Lot Coverage. (Ref. Ord. 951)
(1) The maximum percent of the area of a lot allowed to.be
covered by the main building and all accessory buildings is
as follows:
(a) One (1) Story - forty percent (40�) ma�imum; fifty
percent (50$) with a special use permit as provided.iz (4)
b�low. . •� - • .
.18.03.
LOT
REQUIREMENTS
AND SETBACKS
� (b) Two:.:(2) S.to.ry� - .tY�,irty.-�ive• p�Xcent (35�) maximum; ,
• .. �� . : :-Four.ty-fiv�• .per•cent: r{��C#�$��. wi�h_ .a••:speci'al .us�= pezmit� .as -� - � � .
� provided in (4) below. �
(c) TTiree (3)= Story -' thirty percerit �(30$). maximum; fourty ��
-__ percent -(.40�) wiCh a� specia�=use permit:as pravided in (4) �
' below. '. ` . ' • '- -
(d) Four (4) Story - twenty-five percent (25$) ma�imum;
thirty-five percent (35�) with a special use permit in (4)
below.
(e) Five (5) Story - twenty percent.(20�) maximum; thirty
per�ent (30�) with a special use p.ermit as provided in (4)
below. • �
(f) Six (6) Story - fifteen percent (15$) ma�imum; t�:enty-
five percent (2.58) with a special use permit in (4) below.
(2) The above lot coverage will be subject to other
��•� ' cr�nsiderations inc2udin��parking and'open space requirements,
use of �acilities, �and proximity to othe'r districts, which may
decrease the maximum lot coverage.
6/92 205.M2-5
{�
i
. . . "' ���.
• � �= ..J
� � .
e �/
� �C�VE �tVTS �Y �EVELOPER ^ .
�- ;
DECLARATION OF PROTE�'IVE COVENANTS
Thia Declaration, made and entered into as of the
, 1969, by C::t:AT NORTHERTi RAILWAY
8th day of Oc:tober
CON�ANY. a 1"tianesota corporation, hereina£tez called "Great""
Northern" ;
i4ITNESSETH THP.T. WHEREAS:
A, Great Northern is the owner of land called GREAT
NORTF�RN INDUSTRIAI' ��``TER - FRIDLE�, situate in the County of
Anoka, State of Minneaota, described as follows:
Lots 1 through 9 inclusive, Slock l; I.otg 1
through 4 inclusive, B1ocY. 2; Lot l, Block 3;
Lot 1, Block 9; Lot l, Block 5; Lots 1 through 4
inclusive• Block 6; Lots 1 through 6 inclusive.
Block 7; I.cts 1 and 2, Block 8; Lots l, 2 and 3,
Block 9; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 10; Lots 1, 2
and 3, Block 11, Outlots A through 2 inclusive
and Outlots AA through 0o inclnsive, all in
GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTP.IAL CEt:TER - FRZDLEY,
according to the plat thereof on file and of
record in the Office of t��eSOtarar of Titles,
in aad for Anoka County,
B. Great Northern is desirous of subjecting GREAT
NORTHERN INDU6TRIAT' CEr'TER - FRIDLEY, except Lot 1. Block 3,
Lhereof, to the protective covenants hereinafter set fortht
NOW T�1tEF�RE� Great Northern, for itself, its successors
nnd aesigne, hereby declares GREAT NOF�'I�RN ZNDUSTRIAL ��TER -
FRIDLEY, hereinafter in this Declaration called "CENTER", except
Lot 1, Block 3, thereof, is ancl shall be held, transferred, sold,
conveyed and occupied subject to the protective covenants hereinafter
aet forth:
SECTIOII I
Purflose
"CENTRR° is subjected to these protective covenants for
the purpose of enconra9ing the T"°st appropriate use of the land
within "CENTER". P=eventing the overcrowding of lnnd, presen►ing
and increasing the amenities of the area, encouraqing the erection
of attractive improver.tents thereon, a�-sintaining proper set-backs
:.
:'
t
;
,�'
. �
1'
�
I �
�
f.
' �.
� �
� �
I y
I
i
"fi!:�-,�r� �•�-
�
_, L _ .
fsom tha streets, and in qeneral providinq adequately �or the
high type and quality improvement of "CENTER".
SECTION II
Buiiainq site
� The term "buildin �site" as used in this Declarntion•shall
e deesaed to mean a tract of land within "CENTER" hsvin9 not less
than twc acres of land area and, exceflt for Lot 1, Bloc:k 1, of ssid
�lat, aot less than 150 feet of fron�age on a public street (whether
such public street is dedicated os is dedicated in the future). No
building or other strucLure (exclusive of streets, curbs, qutters,
railioad trackage, utility lines, signs as set forth herein in
Section III, and appurtenances thereto) shall be permitted in "CF::"ER"
other than on a buildinq site. No private easement for roadway,
atzeet or driveway purposes shall be granted over Outlota A, C, D,
E� F� G� H� I� T� U� V� W� X� Y� a71C1 Z inclusive, aI1C1 011t�.OtB i��
BB� CC� EE� FF, GG� HFi� II� JJ� and KK inClublve� whiCh prOVide
the sole meana of access to any building site or any other tract of
land within "CENTER", except those granted or dedicated to a public
body, such as a muaicipal corporation or political subdivision.
SECTION III
General Restrictions
A. USES: All building sites are to be used primarily
for manufacturinq, compounding, treatment, asaemblinq, processing,
packaqing, wholesalinq, jobbing, warehousinq, distribution, storage,
or business of a similar naturer and no portion of any building site
shall be used for any of the following uses:
(1) Dwellinga, motels, hotels, nursin.q homes,
boarding house�, apnrtment buildinqs, town-
houaes, mobile homes, trailers or residences
of a similar natures pzovided, however,
reaidential uses necessary for operatinq,
i �
1%
i.
! { � i�
{o .';�'
1 .t
. �.�
x.'f
i •+l :
p
�
�.
� �; �
♦ �:
��.
�•:
!
:;
Ii
I -�
.�` �
. P�
�.
�
�, .
I
I � '�
I
I {
I .�!
��y�it'�. 1'.
- 3 -
security or safety re.tisons in relation to a
principal use shall be allowed within a
buildinq site.
(2) Retail places of business enqaqed in th� ^ale
to the qenezel public of motor fuels, automotive
acceaeoriea, food, liquor or bevezages of �Y
sort, entertainment, autoanotive or t�� �in-
tenance or repair, aad bvsinesses of a eimilnr
naturet provided, howe�•er, in-plant eervices
of auch similar aatu�°- 8re permitted on a
building eite, when such services are zequired
in the operation and maintenance of a principal
use on said building site.
(3) Signs whfch direct nttention, carry anY written
announcement, declaration, demonstration,
display. illustzation, insignia or illumination
used to advertise, promote or direct attention
to a business, cos�¢nodity, service, or location
not exclusively related to "CENTER"; provided,
however, siqns directing attention to the
location of a business within "CENTER° or
advertising the sale or lease of real esta�e
within "CEh'TER" shall not be subject to the
restrictions of this subparagraPh �3�'
(4) Signs attachecl to a building which extend
above the eave line of such building; signs
all or any part of which are within the boundary
of a public street (whether such public street
is dedicated or is dedicated in the future);
siqns not on a buildinq site; signs in excess
of 100 square feet of total illustrated
surface area per 43,SG0 square feet of
� �
E����
�� ; e
,-
:,�, ,
:�r
. .., .
.1
',%. �
a: •
:•
.
. •.
�
t`.
0
�
0
� 4 �
bnilding site area; signs in excess of
40 feet above the average center line grade
of the adjacent public atreet aearest to
saa�l signj provided, :.owev�r, :.:gns directinq
• attention to the location of a busineae
within "CENTER". cr.adver�ising the sale or
lease of zeal estate within ''CENTER", shall
not be requized to be located on a buildinq
site, ar.d such signs shall not be subject to
the hereinbefore stated size limitation, and
such signs shall not be used in computing
surface area when determining the area of
illustrated surfacing allowed on a buildiny
site.
B. SET-BACK REQUIREMENTS: No building or other struc-
ture or object (exclusive of streets, curb, gutters, acceas drive-
ways, sidewalks, sczeening walls and azchitectural :..::tures,
fences, landscaping, railroad tracics, utility liaes and appurten-
nnces thereto? shall be permitted in "CE1��ER" nearer than:
(1) 35 feet from the front exterior boundsry line
of a building site fronting on a public atreet
(whether such public street is dedicated or is
dedicated in the future).
(2) 20 feet from sny side or rear exterior boundary
line of a building site. Except that a building
or structure may be located within said 20 feet
if the adjacent tract or parcel of land is
utilized for railroad trackage and said building
or str. :ure is designed to allow loading, un-
loading and similar services normally provided
from railroad trackage.
0
�• ..
dF
�—
- 5 -
The area betaeen t1'►e
perimeter of a building site and any building or atru�:ture located
thereon shall be used for lannscaping, walks, access driveways,
loadinq areas, or i�arking areass provided, hov��er, no driveway
parallsl to nn exterior boundary line, parkinq area, or loadinq
area shnll br permitted nearer than:
(3) 35 feet from the front exterior boundary line of
a building site frontinq on a public street (whether
such public stzeet is dedicated or is dedicated in
the futuze).
(4) Five (5) feet from any side or rear exterior bound-
nry line of a building site.. Except that a loadinq
area may be iocated r:ithin the said five feet if
the adjacent tract or parcel of land is utilized
for railroad trackage and said loadinq area is
designed to allow loading, unloading and similar
services normally provided from railr�u: trackage.
F:xcept that driveways parallel to an exterior
boundary line, loading areas, and parking areas
may be located kithin said five feet if u�cz in
co�aon and in conjunction with an adjoining build-
ing sitc.
C, pARKING AND APPURTENANT I�',ANEWERIIvG AREAS:
From and after the date that a building is constructed on a build-
ing site, the owaer from time to time of such building site shall
maintain adequate and sufficient off-street parking and maneuver-
ing areas thereon to serve the needs of such building site and
the needs of all employees, visitors, invitees or customers of
sueh owner, taking int� .ccount the stzuctures, building or build-
ings located or to be located thereon and the use made or to be made
thereof. Said owner ahnll construct and maintain at all times such
Pa'•`LM1Rjy'1G�•�". �'.— 'v-._.r::rr-- -r - - _ — ..- . .- - - - . • -. .
I �
i �
i r
I•
��.
_... ,�
t..
I
.
' f
l �
�: �
0
�
= 6 -
�
parkinq areas, maneuvezinq areas and drivea surfaced with asphalt;
concrete or other means so as to provide a firm aad duat-frea
surface. If visible from an adjacent public street (whether such
publ�c street i.s dadicated at the time of :.,nstructioa or is
dedicated thereafter), said owner shall screen sAid parkiag and
maneuveriag areas with an architectural feature, wall. fance oz
landacape plantinq not less than three feet in heiQht and not leas
than 50 per cent opaque-
D. LOADING DOCKS ]1ND 1NANEUVERING AREASs From and after
the date that a building is constructed on a buildiaq site, the
owner from titae to tin►e of such buildinq site shall provide ade-
quate loadinq facilities thereon to serve the aeeds of euch
buildinq site, taking into account the building or bu��dinqs
located or to be located thereon and the use made or to be made
thereof. Said owner shall further provide such loading facilitiea
and mnneuveriag areas in such manner, form and extent on the build-
ing site so as to insuze so far as possible that .�o loading, un-
loading or maneuvering of motor vehiclea takes place on a public
street or on an adjoining tract or parcel of land occupied by
railroad trackage. Said owner shall construct and. maintain at all
titnes such loadinq and maneuvering areas surfaced with asphalt,
concrete or other means so as to provide a firm and dust-free
surface. If visible from an adjacent public street (whether such
public street is dedicated at the time of cons`ruction or is
dedicated thereafter), said owner shall acreen said loading docks
and maneuvering areas with an architectural feature, wall, fence
or landscape planting not less than six feet in height and not
less than 100 per cent opaque the year around.
E. oUTf" E STORAGE: All building sites are to be use3
primarily for the construction of structurea or buildings and their
appurtenancesj however, the storaqe of pareonal property other than
rnilroad equipment or transportation vehicles shall be allowed in
�
( •4
i �
. ,�
.�
�
i
,
,
� �
I�'�
i � -
"CENTER" provided the folluwin9 minimum requirements are met: -
(1) Such storaqe arees shall be surfaced by a means
providinq a f irm and duat-free surface.
(2) Such etorage areas shall be scc•�ened from view
fr� �y adjoining buildinq site nnd from any
public street (whether such public atreet is
dedicated at the time of construction or is
dedicated thereafter) by a building, structure
or architectLral feature, wall, fence or land-
scape plan�ing not less than eight feet in
height and not less than 100 per cent opaque
the year around.
(3) Such etorage areas shall conform with the "ront
set-back requirements for buildings or other
structures a3 established hereinbefore in Para-
qraph B(1) of this Section III.
g. CONSTRUCTION: The outside walls of �nY �d all
buildinge or atructurea erected or constructed on a building site
shall ba of fireproof material and all such outside walls frontin4
on a public street shall be treated as as► architectural surface
with appzopriate decorative features compatible with adjacent
buildinga or atructures within "CF.NTER".
�, pERFORMANCE STANDARDS: For the purpose of develop-
~ ~ the follow-
ing a compatiblQ relationship of uses within "CENTER",
ing minimum standards shall apply and shall be met by all uses on
building sites within said prenises: erated
(1) hoise: Any use established shall be so op
so that noise resulting from said use is generally
not perceptible beyond the exterior boundaries of
the building site on which such use is located.
This staadard shall not 8PP1Y to incidental
traffic, parking, loading, unloading, railroad
0
d
�
,:
,�
� �i
I � .'•
�
a�
:
�
;
r
�
1 `
� ';
' i
� �.�
± {
� �:
� �.
s
; �:
i �. .
I+ �
:sF . .. �.A
�
- g _
operations, conatruction, or mainteaance
cperations.
(2j Smoke and Particulatc Alatter: Any use estab-
lished, enlarged or remodaled shall be ao operated
as to control the emission oi emoke or particulate
matter to the degree that it is not qenerally
detrimental to or shall endanqor the health,
safety, comfort or aeneral welfnre of the public.
For the purpose of grading t�e•dEnsity of smoke,
the Rinqelmann Chart or equivalent publiehed and
used by the United States Bureau of Mines ehall
be employed. The emission of smoke shall not be
of a den6ity greater than No. Z on the Rinqelmann
Chart.
(3) Toxic or Noxious Matter: Any use established shall
be so operated as not to generally discharge acrosa
the exterior boundaries of the building site or
through percolation into the �ubsoil beyond the
exterior boundaries of the building site wherein
such use is located, toxic or noxious matter in
such concentration as to be generally detrimental
to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort
or welfare or cause injury or damaqe to property
or business.
(4) Odors and Air Pollution: Any use established, en-
larqed or remodeled shall be operated so as to
qenerally prevent the emission of odors or taatter
which is of auch qunlity and quantity as to be
readily detectable at nny point bcyond the exterior
boundary line of tiia building site on which such
use is located.
(5) Vibration: Generally nny use creating periodic earth-
shckinq vibrations, such as may be created
� y :V �
N
.y
$..
�
t
;
(6)
(7)
- 9 •
tr� a drop forqe, slall be prohibited if
auch vibretiona are pe=ceptible beyond the
exterior boundarY line of the Luilding site
on which the use is located. This stand�rd
ehnll aot apply to vibrations created during
the procese of constzuction or vibrations
of any type incident to railway operations.
Glare or Heat: Any use requiriag an operdtion
produciag an intense 2:sat or light trans-
miseion shall be performed with the necessary
ehieldiag to prevent such heat or light from
being detectable at the exterior boundary
line oi the building site on which the use
ia located. Lighting, other than illumiaation
for street, parkinq area, loadinq area, walk,
drivewny, and railway signals shall be diffused
or directcd away from dedicated public streets-
Radiation and Electrical F�nissions: No activ-
itiea shall be permitted that emit danqerous
rndioactivity beyond enclosed azeas. There
shall be no use established which creates
electrical disturbance adversely aifecting the
operation of any equipment in "CENTER" other
than that of the creator of the disturbance.
SECTION IV
UNDERGROUND UTZLITIES
It is the intent and purpose of "CEPITER", in keeping
with the general plan for the development thereo=. to have a sub-
stantial pazt of the electric p��rer distribution lines, 4ag �ins,
teleph�ne and communication lines, hereinafter referred to as
undezground utilities, placed underground.
. �
f �.
�.
..��.
•;x
'x. i
�
0
i
�
�
:�•.�. .; .. . . ..
•� .
- •lo -
(1) Easements, pe�its or li�:enses for such underqround
utilities have been graated cn tlie plat of °CEtiTER" or will here-
after be granted.
(2) "CENTER", �d �Y building or structure located
thereoa, shall be serviced by said underqround utilitiea and by such
facilities which shall be located above, on or beneath tha qround
surfaca appurteaant to said undezqround utilities ns are necaeaary
er convenien*_ for the operation or maintenance of anid underqround
utilities. Aboveqround gas mains, electrical, telephone and com-
munication service facilities, poles, wires and nppurtennnces may
be temporarily installed on the qround surface or overhead during
coastruction or durinq repair of said respective uaderqround utility
systems.
(3) No excavations, except for underqround utilities,
no changes of finished grade, and no structures or apparatus of any
kitul, except line fances, shall be allowed within said underqround
utility easements of °CENTER". No driveway or other areas shall
be paved until the property owner has coordinated this wo�k with
the appropriate utility company involved and said utility company
haa given property owner written notice that this work and the
existence of the driveway or other paved +�rea will not interfere
aith the respective uaderqrowid utility. Except as F�ovided herein,
the owr►ers shall have the right to make any use of the land subject
t� such easements which is not inconsistent with the riqhts qranted
foz said underground utilities; provided, however, that the owners
aball not plant trees or large shrubs within the underground utility
easements. Utility companies shall have the right, without incurring
any liability to the property owner for doing so, to trim, cut, or
remove trees, buehes, or other plants of any kind located within
�aid uaderground utility easements, and shall a:so have the right
to trim roots and foliage of any trees, bushes, or other plants.,
.. .. � -, --•- _. ::�.r-r.w:-�.:Yrf.°!
I
r
f
�
�
:x
�
�; 1
;�
�� ;
��
;• .
4�
:�� '
;- �
r.•
r.
' ' �
�e
�
-' i -
Whether within or without said u•iderqround easements, which in the
opinion of Utility Companies may interfere with the facilities
located within said underground utility easements or wlth the
installation, reinatallation• modification, repair, r�aintenance, or
removal thereof.
(4) The qrade estnbliehed by "CENTER" in accozdance r+ith
local goverruaeatal regulations at the time the respective Utility
Compa�y places ita underqround facility in said easemeats shall be
considered the final or finiehed c�rade. No property owner shall
�ks �np ahange in such grade in or near eaid easements or alter
any qround conditions, including drainage, when the chanqe in qrade
or alteration of ground conditions, in the opinion of the respec-
tive Utility CompanY. interferes with the facilities already
installed.
(5) property owners shall pay to the respective Utility
Cosnpany the cost of relocation or rearrangement of utility equip-
ment where, in the opinion of said Utility, such relocation or
rearrangement is made necessary because of a violation by t1�e Prop-
erty owner of any of the foregoing restrictions pertaining ta
unntrqround utility installations.
(5) Notwithstanding any provisions of Paragraphs (1)
through (5) of this Section IV to the contrarY• Great Northern
Railway CompanY� for itself, its successors and assigns, and for
any other rnilroad company admitted to use of �rackage in "C�TEF",
hereby specifically reserves the right to construct, maintain,
operate and use railway trackage and buildings or other structures
for railway purposes upon the said underGround utility easements,
and zeservea the zight to construct, maintain and use or to permit
to be conatructed, maintained and used by others any existinq or
additional pipe, teleqraph, telephone or power transmission lines
upon, over or beneath the said underground utility easements, end
0
I
� ���
. ,
t
�. �
� .�
� `.
i }'
i:
ri'
.!
_ ;�: �.
' �';
� �•.
+ � � •.
�• .
, �
1
�
t •%*
i
i
t
•� 12 -
reaez-ves the riqht to make any changes in grade or location of its
railway or any of its tracks or to rearranae its station facilitiea,
or to use said underqround utility easements or any part thereof
gor railway purposes. Any and all utilities snal' :�e placed over
�
or undez aailway Company trackage in accordance with Rnilway
Company plans aau specifications.
S�CTZON V
Enforcement
These protective covenants shall operate as covenante
runniag with the land and shall be enforceable by each and every
owner of a building site or by Great rlorthern, either in law or in
equity, and such owner or owners or Great Northern shall have �he
right to aue for and obtain (a) an injunction, prohibitive or
mandatory, to prevent the breach of, or to enforce the performance
or observance of, these protective covenants or (b) a money judg-
ment for damages by reason of a breach of these protective cove-
nants, or (c) both (a) and (b) .
S�CTIOII VI
Duration of These Protective Covenants
These protective covenants shall be binding upon and
shall inure to the benefit of Great 2�orthern, its successors anci
assigns, to and including 30 years from date, at which time the
same shall terminate and be of no further force and efFect.
SECTIOh VII
tdodification and Extension
This Declaration and the protective covenants herein con-
tained may be amended in any respect, or terminated, at any time
and from time to time by written agreement duly filed for regiatration
y
I :
� .r
(� ` '!,:
I'
I �.
T
:, • , �
'� .
I
i
�
i ���
�:.
t.
:�
.�
�
I 1
� �.
l ,
` �.
w.
�1
A
- .i'D .�. �1�
�_' . . . .
- 13 -
in the Office of the Regiatrar oz :itlea for Anoka County, Minnesota,
and duly executed in zecordable form by peraons, partsserships, cor-
porations, and other entities who, in thcs agqreqate, are on the date
of filing, the s:+acrd holdars of leqal title to at least sixty (60)
per.cent of the land acreage in "CENT�:R" exclusive of streets and
other public lands, if any•
SECTZON VIIZ
5everabilitx
Invalidation o� any of the provisions of these protective
covenants whether by Court Ozder or otherwise ahall in no way affect
any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and
ef fect.
SECTI01� I}:
�I
!; Captions
� i . in these rotective covenants,
The captions, appearing P
are inserted only as a matter of convenience and ir. no way define,
S
e
co e or intent of these protectiv
limit, constnie or describe the s p
i
�
�:�
covenants nor in any way modify or affect the same.
IN TESTIMONY WHE:REOF, Great Northern Railway CompanY has
causcfl this instzument to be executed i:i its corporate name by its
President and its Assistant Secretary
and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed the day and year first
hereinabove written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
��Jlx��Y i=!�r�� �
�f.�`�_���4�
GgEAT NOR IERi� RAILWIIY COTSPIIATY
�
BY � � ��_ - --
r Presi ent
v
.
Attest: �--����
' C�i�• � ' `'`':c+
(CORYORA'T'�. `�• � , • •p
.�': C � �� •th
�i�, ..... •
'1:�,,�
���...,. .. �
t
�.
� ��
i`
:�
` :r:•
� xr j
r 1
I
.�
:,
14 i
;
. �.
. .�.
I j i'
3�
i�
-;�.
�.
i 1.
I
�
�
�
�
�� .
1
1
i �
� . •(
.: A
I• �
I .. �
!
.
: �
1 �
. ;
� ;
. ,
�
.�.- �-:
- 14 -
STATE OF MItJNESOTA)
)ss
COUNTY OF RA.�SSEY )
On this 8th day of ____ October __ , 1969, before
me, a Notary public, within and for said County personally appeared
J. b1. Budd and G. I'. Steinhfbel ____ to me
personally known, Mho, being eacli Ly me duly sworn did say that they
are respectively the raaaauca.� ......
Assistant Secretazy of GREAT NORTI�ERN RAILWAY CODiPArY, the
-------------------
corporation named in the furegoing instrument, and that the seal
affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation
and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said
corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and sr:',
J. N. Dudd and G. F. Steinhibel
acknowledged said instrumeni to be the free act and deed of ;6aid �:''•�,��
:�� , •;
corporation. � •
� �� ..� ` �
-- � � =-------- - . .
%' . . •
R. M. BROROPP. NoUry PuDU0. R�miry Carmr, Minn. ."' �
My Commlatron Gcylru AprU Z2, li)0
I �iL•R: DY C�:<'?'t'r'P T?1AT T'E TAXES
FF. :" EiE IT: '; ;" `�° :?.:;/�0i•' Ti °E
L�i.JaD:.::C:;:i:: �•r•.'li11Nh1iENhID
l�nol:n Cc•• �'y Treas:uez
T,AXES ?AiD
,,;��'. :, :�; ,,�i�� '_-i�� /
�!. .,,� �! J/.�f� ��
/'�.lr.� yfi.7�.1 .: '; �•
- - . . �'�� �j�`�
:i�' Y./ 4\ . .
)..`'... -_.. . .
�
.�
:
:
.�.
1 ,f, I
wi..
�.
3
-,�
.� �
�
;
I '
i �:
i
f
L
�
.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 5�432
�
'
�
(Cl2) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEIVT
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: 52nd
Property Identification Number (PIN) 27-30-24-12-0013 and -0014
Legaldescription: Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Great Northern Industrial Center
Lot Block TracdAddition _ .
Current zoning: I-2 Squaze footagelacreage 177,290/4.07 Ac.
Reason for lot split: Lot 2 is currently only 1�.69 acres and needs an �addition
of .31 acres to meet park covenants.
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes X No If yes, which city? l�inneapolis
If yes, what tyge of business? Pest control
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No X
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
NAME Trillium Corporation - Pentas
ADDRESS 1307 Cornwall, Suite 200
lingham wA 98225 DAYTIME PHONE ( 206 ) 738-3050
SIGNAT , —�- � ._._.,�' , ,� � �� �/-� L�ATE�D Zd-f ��t L
` . _ _ . . . _-. , �
PETITIONER INFORMATION
NAME Plunkett's Pest Control
ADDRESS 282$-llth Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55��7 DAYTIMEPHONE (612) 871-7100
SIGNATURE ��� �, ' �- � � � � DATE i o � �l �' `�l
Fee: $250.00 �/ y ? � f
Permit L.S. # � `�'� - � 1 Receipt #
Application received by: -
Scheduled Planning Commission date: ���� �'E����G� �=3� r%`�`� L/
Scheduled City Council date:
�
n
n