Loading...
PL 03/20/1996 - 7067/"', ; PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINC WEDNESDAY, MARCH 20, 1996 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC COPY (Please return to Communtty Development Dept) � � ,-•s � � CITY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETiNG YVEDNESDAY, MARC� 20� 1996 7:30 P.M. L�ATION: Fridley Municipel Center, 6431 Univ� Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL• . • � . - � . - APPROVE PLANNIIVC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: March 6, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING: (�NSIDEHi�T10N OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #96-01 BY RONALD AND JANET ZACZKOWSI4: Per Section �05.07.Oi.C.{1� of the Fridley City C�e, to allow a s+econd accessory building in excess of 240 square feet� on Lots 29 - 32, Block A, Riverview NJeights, generaNy located at 314 Hugo Street N.E. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPUT REGIUEST. L.S. #96-01. BY VALLEY � INVESTMENT CO: To split Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, together with all that part of the vacat�! alley lying west of said lots and lying between the VM�terly extension of the North line of said Lot 1, and the W�terly extension of the South line of said Lot 3 into two parcels as describ�: Parcel A. The West 65 feet of Lot 1� 2� and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, Anoka Courrty� Minnesota, as measur� atong the North line of said Lot 1, and along the South line of said Lot 3, together with all that part of the vacate.d alley lying West of said lo#s, and lying between the Westerly-.exteFlSion of the North line of said Lot 1, and the Westerfy ext�nsion of the South line of said Lot 3. Parcel B. That part of Lo� 1� 2, and 3� Block 27� Hyde Park, Anoka Courrty, Minnesota� lying East of the West 65 feet thereof as measured along the North tine of said Lot '! and along the South line of said Lot 3. This property is generally locat� at 276-78 58th Avenue NE. �, Planning Commission Agenda March 20, 1996 Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION REQUEST. SAV #96-01. BY IMPERIAL HOMES. INC.: To vacate that part of the drainage and utility easemerrt as dedicated on Lot 7, Block 1� Totino Grace Additio�, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the norifi line of said Lot 7 distant 65.10 feet e�st #rom the northwest comer of said Lot 7; thence on an assumed bearing of South 28 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along the w�t li�e of said drainage and uutility easemerrt 64.13 fee� #hence South 38 degrees 00 minutes East 32.� •f� thence North 24 Degree,s 16 Minutes 58 Seconds W�t 92.63 feet tb a��poirrt on said north line �dista�it 12 feet �st of said �int of beginning; thence South T7 degreas 31 minutes 44 s�nds W�t 1200 fee# to the poirrt of beginning. Except the nortl� 5 f� th�eof, g�er�ally located a# 1435 Royal Oak Court NE. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTH{�RITY OF FEBRUARY 8. 1996 n RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETiNG OF FEBRUARY 14. 1996 � RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE E�MRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20. 1996 OTHER BUSIiVESS: ADJOURNMENT � �- ,f � i Ei / 1 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNIN(� CO�IBBION ME$TINa, MARCH 6� 1996 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the March 6, 1996, Planning Commiasion meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Newman, Dean Saba, Brad Sielaff, Connie . Modig . Members Absent: Dave iCondrick, Diane Savage, -LeRoy Oquist Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Rurt Jensen-Schneider, Planning Assistant Londa Rroone, 5933 Main Street N.E. �,pPR(9;iAT. �F' FF.RRIIARY 7_ 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION MINIITES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approvs �the February 7, 1996, Planning Commission minutes as written. � IIPON A VOICE YOTE � ALL VOTIN�3 AYB, CHAIRP8R80N �IEWMAI�T DECLABED T88 MOTION CARRIED �MOIISL3f. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AN OR.DINANCE AMENDMENT RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE: Chapter 205.07, entitled R-1, one-Family Dwelling District Regulations, by adding subsection 205.07.06.A.(3); and Chapter 2,05.�8, entitled R-2, �wo-Family Dwelling Distri�t Reg�l�tions, b� addi�g subsectiQn 20�.08.06.A.(3j. Tiie purpose of this ordinance amendment is to limit front yard driveways and parking stalls in single family and two fa�a3ly zoned districts to no more than thirty percent (30�) of the calculated front yard area. OM TION by Ms. Modiq, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICT VOTS, AL3, VOTINa AYE, CHAIRPER80N NEWMAN DECLAR�D T8E MOTION CARRIED AND THE POBl,�C HEARINa OPEN AT 7a35 P.M. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated staff is seeking input on a pr.oposed change to the R-1 and R-2 sections of the Fridley City Code regarding paved surface front yard coverage of one and two-faniily residential parcels. The purpoae of the public hearing is to get �.., public input regardinq the change. . Mr. Jensen-Schneider state�i #�+� r�#�.c��l� �Q� �is change is PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETINa. MARCH 6. 1996 PAa$ 2 - � closely related to the driveway issue discussed at the last Planninq Commission meetinq. The idea of a hardsurface coverage requirement was first discussed in 1993. In the aqenda packet was a copy of the letter from Ms. McCollom which generated that discussion. In the letter, Ms. McCollom expresses her frustration with a neiqhbor paving the entire front yard. In an informal neighborhood meeting conducted by staff, one of the concerns was that someone would pave their front yard. This.is still a related issue. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated the agenda packet includes a one-page lot coverage study which reviews the requirements of �urroundinq communities and reveals that limiting front yard'impervious surface coverage is not an uncommon requirement. Also included in the agenda is a sampling of lot coverages throughout the community and visual samples via aerial photos to demonstrate some of the these coveraqes. The lot coverages ranges from 15� up to 58�. Mr. Newman asked what area is covered in the example showing 58$ coverage. , Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated the property has a hard-surface drive and the remainder of the yard appears to be landscape gravel. ,..� Mr. Saba stated it is common in areas with water shortages to landscape the yards in such a way. He asked if this home owner has had complaints from the neighbors. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated he has not received complaints since he had been on the staff. The samples pulled out in 1993 are examples that appear to have excessive hardsurface coverage in the front yard. Mr. Saba stated he thought it necessary to be very careful to distinguish between hardsurface and a landscaped surface. There must be some way to do this. Ms. Modig asked if they were talking only about hardsurface areas. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated, as the proposed ordinance is written, they are talkinq about blacktop or concrete. Mr. Saba asked what the lot coverage would be for the last example in terms of lot coverage using this definition. Mr. Hickok stated he believed the 58� came from the hard surface area and did not include the landscape qravel area. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated the language of the proposed � � ^ PLANNIN�3 COMMISSIOAi MEETIN(�. MARCH 6, 1996 PAaL 3 ordinance would be considering hardsurface that is specifically used for parkinq purposes. It doe� not include walkways or patios. Mr. Newman asked what would happen, for example, if a person decides he wants to have a hard surface front yard and use it for a basketball court but does not park on it. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated, ae the languaqe is now written, he thought it would be an acceptable hardsurface use. Mr. Hickok stated�•thie would be.a.rare.instance. This is the section of the code that is in�the zoning text which is different from a nuisance. There is a variance provision for extenuating circumstances. A person could challenge this. Staff would look closely if someone were going to pave their front yard. Mr. Newman stated the language references hardsurfaces �or driveways or parking. He shares Mr. Saba's concerns. What are we trying to get at? Are we trying to addreas concerns of impervious surfaae and �n off or are we trying to address parking issues? � Mr. Hickok stated he thought the issue was parkinq and not turning the front yard into a parking lot. If language is needecl to differentiate between folks who want to do something else, staff can look at it. Mr. Newman stated the problem is enforcement. Is this used for a parkinq lot or is it landscaping? The City could run into problems with enforcement. It is better to step back and ask if public policy is to l�mit impervious surface. Does the ��i*y 2�ave an ordinanee that talks abaut the amount of impervious s�rface allowed? Mr. Hickok stated there is such an ordinance for commercial properties but not for residential. Drainaqe could be an issue, and staff could use that to make this broader. Mr. Sielaff stated ordinance as it is yard. you must then address the back yard. Thie written does not say anything about the back Mr. Hickok stated the ordinance as it is written is intended to talk about the driveway and the front yard. The percentage is based on the area of the front yard and the amount of hardsurface drive. Mr. Newman etated he had a neighbor who parked.a limousine behind � his house. With this ordinance, a person could turn their back yard into a parkinq lot,� �' PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETINa. MARCH 6, 1996 PAQE 4 Mr. Hickok stated a situation such as this would be addressed through the home occupation section of the code. It is possible someone could have four or five vehicles and may choose to use their back yard for parking. Mr. Newman asked the width of a three-car garaqe. Mr. Hickok stated the standard three-car garaqe is approximately 32 feet wide. Mr. Newmara stated there are few three-car garages in Fridley but, as people remodel..and/or upgrade, we will see more. If a person had a straight driveway to the street and has 32 feet of drive on a 90 foot lot, the coverage could be 33� to 35�. Mr. Hickok stated staff scaled other lots to use as examples. With our standard house setback and standard lot widths, he thought a person could utilize a standard driveway for a three- car garage and not exceed 30�. On the lots staff scaiec�, the percentages were closer to 25�. Typically, staff saw driveways narrower at the street and broadening out by the qarage. Ms. Modig asked what would happen to those residents who currently have 58� coverage. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated, because this is a modification to the zoning text, that person would have a pre-existing, non- conforming use. That person would be allowed to keep the driveway. If he/she wants to enlarge it, staff would then review. Ms. Modig asked what would happen if the property were sold. Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated the non-conforming use would go with the property. Ms. Modig stated.this ordinance will then not solve any problems that currently exist. Mr. Saba stated it would solve the problem for existing conditions if there was remodeling or reconstruction on that property. If someone has a driveway with a turnaround.or parkinq space, is over 30� of coverage, is badly cracked or in disrepair, and the owner wants to redo it, would he then be in violation of the ordinance? Mr. Jensen-Schneider stated yes. Mr. Saba stated the owner could'then either=leave�the�driveway�as it is, use the hardsurface that is there, or forfeit the parking space. � ;� �"� � PLANNING CONIIriIBBION MEETING. MARCB 6, 1996 PAQS 5 Mr. Hickok stated, in this case, the person would have to rebuild usinq the 50� standard. Mr. Newman stated the homeowner could redo the �rea piecemeal. Ms. Modig stated enforcement then continues to be the problem. Mr. Newman stated homeowners also have the variance process they could go through. Mr. Sielaff asked what was an acceptable runoff for a residential dr�.veway. � � . � . Mr. Hickok stated they do not have a.hardsurface coverage requirement for residential. They have a structural coveraqe requirement. Therefore, the engineerinq staff do not qet involved with residential issues. If there is a question about sheet drainage or a surface easeme�t, they would then get involved but not otherwise. Ms. Mod3g asked if the engineering staff get involved with ner� developments. � Mr. Hickok stated yes, especially if it is multi-family. They do not get involved in single family residential on a lot-by-lot basis. �"`�, Mr. Sielaff asked how the engineering staff would design it if this were the case. They must take inta account a certain size driveway for run off. Mr. Hickok stated, in a new development area, staff would take ' standard setbacks and standard drive widths to calculate the runoff for that area. Mr. Sielaff asked if there was some basis for limiting coverage if drainage is the issue. Mr. Hickok stated there is merit to that as well as other issues� such as a driveway versus a basketbali court. Staff can take this back and do an evaluation on the runoff. • � Mr. Newman asked if there was a time factor on this. Mr. Hickok stated this could go before the City Council on April 22. Mr. Newman recommended discussion be tabled in order for staff to further evaluate the comments.�' Mr . Newman asked when the aer j,,� ,�o�# were taken e PLANNINa CO1�lI88ION MEETIN�. MARCH 6. 1996 pAG$ 6 Mr. Hickok stated the photos were taken in either 1993 or 1994. Mr. Newman asked for comments from the public. Ms. Rroone stated she has a 40-foot lot. Since they bought the house 20 years aqo, it has always had a front driveway. The drive is now dirt and they plan to hardsurface. She is concerned if they would_be able to keep their front driveway. They have very little space for company to park. She also does not care to park in the street or have visitors park there. She has had a hit-and-run with her car. That street is very busy and will qet busier. She asked.who came up with the 30�. The garaqe is detached and set back behind the house. Also, they put an addition in the back of the house and she planned to put the driveway to the garage and bring the hard surface to the back door. Could there be special circumstances if it turned out the coverage would be at 35�? Could there be an exception? She would hate to lose a front driveway. Mr. Newman stated he did not think the fact that the garage was set back was of concern. The proposed ordinance talks about front yard coverage. Ms. Kroone stated, since that part is seen to the street, would that footage change. Mr. Newman stated the calculations would occur from the front of the house to the street. Whether or not it is seen from the street is immaterial. The 30� figure came from what other communities have adopted. The purpose of the hearing is to see if this figure should be 30�. He asked Ms. Rroone what the width of the driveway would be. Ms. Kroone stated the driveway would be about 10 feet to 13 feet but it would be narrower by the street. Mr. Newman stated the proposed language would exclude sidewalks. The calculations would include only the driveway and parking surface. If she has a 40-foot lot and a 10-foot driveway, that is 25� coverage. Ms. Kroone asked if there could be exceptions to the figure that is decided. Mr. Newman stated a variance is an option�. They want to draft the ordinance to minimize the need for variances. An essential element in order to enforce an ordinance is to keep it fairly specific and remove as much objectivity as possible. They would hate to see the ordinance preveflt anyone from-having a driveway. There are ways to do this and address the concerns. One of which. is for you to have a hard su�face drivewa�. %"1 n i � pLANNINt3 COMMI88ION MEETIN(3. MARCH 6. 1996 PAGE 7 No further comment from the public was received. OTIO by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to close the public hearinq. IIPON A VOICS VOTS, ALL VOTINa AYF, C$AIRPER80N �iLWffi�T D$CL7IRED THL ]LOTIO�T CARRIBD A�1D TSS PIIBLZC HEARI�T� CLCSED AT 8 i 06 P. M. Mr. Newman sugqested this item be tabled in order for staff' to address concerns. He has four concerns. First, he thouqht they should take a look at total lot coverage and impervious surface coverage. He thought,staff should�look.at the whole lot.and not just the front yard. Second, if you decide not to deal with lots or impervious surface, staff should look at restricting parking to the hardsurface or driveway areas. Third, look at the 30� figure. He was not sure that 35� would do just as well. Fourth, Ms. Kroone rai�es an interesting concern with the narrow lot. Staff may want to make an exception, in any event, that a person could have a driveway of a minimum width, ie. 15 feet. "� Mr. Saba stated the except3on could be for the old narrow, 40- foot lots. ^ Mr. Hickok stated, for the meeting, staff can take Ms. Kroone's lot as an example and could mail to her that information to give her a sense of what the coverage would be. Mr. Sielaff stated the Edina parking restriction looks as thouqh it incorporates the percentage accordinq to the square footage of the lot. He would be interested to know what their justification is for those numbers. He would like to find out how and why they � came up with those numbers. He wondered if drainage was a ! consideration. Most of the other commuriities have 30�5 front yard area so he did not think they needed fu=ther information on that. Coon Rapids must have less than 50� coverage for buildings, driveways and paved areas. Mr. Newman stated a fifth concern to be addressed was the concern regarding the percentage of coverage being tied to the equare footage of the lot. Mr. Newman asked if they had addressed the landscape concern. Mr. Saba stated they had as long as this is defined with driveway and parking. .It could be a concern with a basketball court or a large patio. There could be some unique situations and he wants to stay clear of those. He would rather confine it to parking. Mr. Newman referred to the example of:�,the�=property �with��58�..� : . . : . � � � �^, coverage and where the front yard is .iandscaped. .j; He wou�d � suspect that the landscaped area`has.biack plastic�vnder the�r�k PLANNINt; COMMISSION MEETINa. MARCH 6. 1996 PAaF 8 n so the impervious surface would actually be nearly 100�. 8e did not want to intrude in a private decision to fully landscape a house or yard, but he �ould be concerned if someone could turn the front of their house into 90� to 100$ impervious surface. Mr. Saba stated this type of landscapinq was promoted by environmental groups during times of drought. OT ON by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Modiq, to table consideration of an ordinance amendment recodifying the Fridley City Code and for staff to address the followinq concerns: 1.' Look at total lot coverage-and:impervidus surface. 2. If not dealing with total lot impervious surface, to restrict parking to the hard surface or driveway areas. 3. Increasing the percentage from 30� to 35�. 4. An exception where, in any event, a person could have a driveway of a minimum specified width. 5. Whether the percentaqe should be tied to the total width of a lot. � IIPON A VOICB VOT$, ALL VOTINt3 AYF, CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECI.ARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINAN7MOIISLY. 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 8 1996 MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receiv� the minutes ;` of the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of January 8, 1996. QPON A VOICL VOTF � ALI+ VOTINt� AYS � Cii�IIRPER80N �TEWMA�T DLCLaRLD THE MOTION CARRIED DN�NIMOIIBLY. 3. RECEIVE THE I�IINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 16 1996 MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality & Enerc�y Connnission meeting of January 16, 1996. IIPON A VOICE VOTI�� ALL VOTIDTa AYI�, CBAIRPERSON NEWMA�T DBCLARFD THg MOTION CARRILD IIN�iNIMOIIBLY. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE AppEALS CpMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 24. 1996 � OTIO by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the � � . PLANNIIJ(,i COMMI88ION MEETING. MARCH 6, 1996 PAGTs 9 � minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of January 24, 1996. IIPO�T A�OICB VOTE � 71I�L VOTINa AYB, CSAIRP8R80�T �iEWMA�T DBCLARBD THE MOTIO�T CARRIED DNA�iIMOIIBI�Y. 5. RF'CEIVE THE MINIITES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING.OF FEBRIIARY 5. 1996 �iOTION by Mr. Saba, secanded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission meetinq of February 5, 1996. IIPON A VOIC� VOT� � ALL VOTI�it,� AYS, CHAIRPLR80N N�i DECI.ARLD TH$ MOTION CARRILD IINANIMOIIBLY. ' . ' . •i�� � 6. � Mr. Hickok stated he warated to hand out the ordinance for non- point source pollution before the public hearing on April 3. The City regulates non-point source pollution through ordinanc�. The Metropolitan Council has asked us, in conjunction with the Home ^ Depot project, to make our language in the Comprehensive Plan match that of the Home Depot project. Mr. iiickok stated the City is also about the revise the Comprehensive Plan. Staff will go out for a housing action plan to be put together. Overall, the Comprehensive Plan aonsistency issues, staff wi11 go through and categorize, inventory and evaluate for consistency; then come back with the inconsistencies for the Planning Commission to review. �' Mr. Newmaa� stated, to clarify, that this makes the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the ordinance previously adopted. Mr. Hickok stated this was correct. The City chose to address non-point source pollution by ordinance. Other cities have done so through their Comprehensive Plan. The Met Council wants the City to do both. Staff will bring this forward in April. 7. IIPDATE ON THE ROTTLUND PROJEG� Mr. Hickok stated this item was before the City Council at their last meeting. Mr. Newman asked what happened to the name "Stonegate". Mr. Hickok stated the :name „"Christensonp-:,.is � somehow�>related. with .:. .� �--...-:-:.:-. � Rottlund. Rottlund asked.at a-previous.meeting if�the Council� , would object to a name change. Thie item had very little' � m PLANNIN�3 COMMI88ION MEETIN�3. MARCH 6, 1996 PAaL 10 � discussion on the part of the Council. Mr. Newman stated Fridley needs more than anything else to chanqe its image. The name of the project is important, but he did not think this name would do that.� They could have a public area named Chri�tenson Park or Christenson Pond but he did not like it as the name of the development. Mr. Saba shared the same concern. Ms. Modig stated she would prefer a name with some pizzazz to it. � Mr. Newman asked staff°to let the City Council know the Planning Commission has strong reservations about the name change and the imaqe it creates. He understands the City Council'e concern but perhaps a public area could be called Christenson Plaza. The name does have historical significance.. Mr. Saba stated he would to go back to Stonegate to keep the character of the development. Mr. Newman asked if the fire department ar police department has any problem with Christenson Lane and Christenson Court as far as emergency planning. � Mr. Hickok stated he had not heard that this is a concern. Mr. Hickok stated, after much discussion on the technical issues of the development agreement, the City Council and Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HI2A) have come to an agreement as to the aspects of the development. These have been some changes made since this was before the Planning Commission. The development � will have 54 detached units, 32 townhome units back-to-back, and 32 row homes. There was much discussion about the three-story condominium buildings and the city's interest in subsidizing the cost. The conclusion was, rather than qo with a subsidy, to have the developer come back with another option. Rottlund came back with one and two-story units.with one and two-stall garages. Mr. Saba stated he was concerned about the one-stall qarages. The Planning Commission wanted two-car garages. Mr. Hickok stated there was concern about pricing. Rottlund was asked to bri.ng the price of the units to where we could still provide affordable options, for example, for those who would have been interested in a condominium for $90,000. The cheapest floor plan is the one-level, one-car garage unit which addresses the accessibility and affordability.issues. Mr. Saba stated he was bothered by the fact,that the City does ��-� not allow anyone else to b1���� �,�i a si�qle-car qarage, but we =.. � PI+ANNINm COMMIBSION MEETING, MARCB 6. 1996 PAaB 11 i-� are doinq it here. Mr. Newman referred to page 12 of the handout. When looking at the elevation, it looks like eiqht units. In lookinq at the site plan, he did not see any units that are eight across. Is the elevation truly accurate? Mr. Hickok stated there are actually icwo units leas and more space between the buildings. These units have window8 front and back. Mr. Newman asked if Chrietenson Court and ChriBtenson Lane will have the same structures. Mr. Hickok stated there will be a mix of one and two-story�units. Rottlund is not to put identical units side-by-side. The City will have to be careful to make certain they do not have identical units. Mr. Newman stated, in �he original plan, the housing �aas a one- story cottage along Christenson Court ar►d a two-story home along Christenson Lane. Are both of those styles going to be� incorparated into this plan? ^ Mr. Hickok stated yes. The cottages are smalier than originally planned to get at the affordability issue. These now have a smaller footprint and a lower price range of approxiffiately $90,000 to $100,000. � Mr. Newman stated the plan originally had a mix of "Z'0 lots and "0" lot lines. If the plan to get.riel of the "0" and go to the n Z �� 1 Ots? Mr. Hickok stated yes. In the tieveiapment d�.scussion, there was some debate over how to integrate affordability and the visual interest. At that point, they decided that segregating the one- story and two-story units might cause a generic appearance rather than have a mix of one and two story units as one would find in a neighborhood. Mr. Newman stated in the original plan the units looked similar and that is what he liked about the desiqn. He asked if the smaller house was the driving issue of the affordable housing. Mr. Hickok stated he thought the City did so because of the commitment to seniors to provide affordable housing with little maintenance. Mr. Newman asked if this was not already being done with the townhomes. PLANNINa COMMIBSION MEETINa, MARCH 6. 1996 PAa� 12 � Mr. Hickok stated it is a different market. The three-story townhomes would attract younger buyers. The real attraction will be for those looking for one-level livinq. Mr. Newman stated he was concerned about affo=dable senior housing. The City is takinq the last piece of available land and developing housing for just.over $100,000. What other opportunities will there be for upscale.housinq in the community? Ms. Modiq stated the original idea of this project �as to make it upscale. Mr. Hiekok stated another issue,was the number of units: We could not stray far from the number of units along with the other issue� in order to make the project work. Mr. Newman asked where the Council was on the issue of the prevailinq wage. Mr. 8ickok stated he believed the Council approved an exemption for the residential project. Mr. Saba stated he does not want anything to cheapen this development. He wants something to make this an icon. He does not like seeing the single-car garages and the higher density. '� Ms. Modig asked if this was a done deal. Mr. Hickok stated yes. These are new products which are a result of the earlier design discussions and which take into consideratian the elements discussed in terms of landscaping, fences, walls, etc. The discussion of the design criteria drove ; the design of those units and the developer looked to do something that would complement that desiqn. 3'hey believe they have designed the features that will allow this to look like a very nice development. Ms. Modig stated thie has one-stall�garages when the Planning Commission had indicated very strongly that it does not work. Her 8on lives in a townhome �ith a one-car garage as do several others next to him. The parking becomes a nightmare. 'Most occupants have two cars. As a result, the visitor parking is generally full of residents' cars. Mr. Newman stated, if you look at the MLS sheets, the number of homes that are not on the river or in Innsbruck which sold for over $100,000 have been very few. If we are going to encouraqe homeowners to invest in their.homes., to renovate, we need to have more homes in the community�-in-«�the:$11o,o0o�,to $120,000 range. The City has many in the $90,000 range.: He.:laoked at this as an � opportunity to move:�the �� ayt�.,,� �;;xealizes�� the seniors are PLANNINa COMMIBBION MEETINa, MARCB 6, 1996 PAa$ 14 �"\ trying to serve three masters - the HRA, the City Council, and the Planning Commission. We have concerns. As Mr. Saba stated, we are doing thinqs here we would not allow else�here. We are allowing one constituency to drive the planning needs of the City. He hopecl that this would be a way to turn the imaqe of the City and he did not think what is being proposed will do that. 8. �IISCELLANEOUS Mr. Hickok stated he will send out a copy of their planning periscope. This is a listing of items that are coming up and tracks when these items will go before the City Council. Mr. Hickok stated a•Hyde Park neighborhood meetinq will be held March 19 regarding the redevelopment of the Frank•s Used Car site. Planning Commiss3on members are welcome to attend. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICL VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYF, CSAIRFER80N NEWMAN DECLARLD T8E MOTION CARRIED AND Tgg MARCg 6� 1996� PLANNING CO�II$SION � MELTINa AD�TOIIRNED AT 8:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ° ���. Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary � ` • o S I G N- IN S H E E T PLANNING COMMIBSION.MEETING, � March 6, 1996 Name Address/Business � ~ r � ..� � � /""1 �^ r � DESCRIPTI�W OF REGIUEST: ' � . . � • • • � � The pebtion� reques�s that a speaal use p�mit be grarrted ier a secor�d garage over 240 , square f�t. If approved, tl� petitioner �nrould be altowed to maintain a 12' x 24' e�dsting tuck-und� garage. 1 __ _ . . SUMMARY OF tSSUES• The petiition� was recerrtiy grar�ted a variance �o red�e the semack of �n aoc�ry structure opening orrto the side str�t trom 25 fe� fio 17 fept. The grarrting �of this variance allows the petitio�� to constru� a 22' x 36' �ed garage. A corxlition o# the variance aPProval required cornersion of the eadstir�g tuck-und� garage t� living space, or approval of a special use permit for a second garage ovw 240 square feet. The petitioner proposes to utilize the tuck undc�r garage for the iamily car. One option for the petitio� would be to store the iamily car in the n�nr garage and utitize the tuck und� garage for the proposed hobby st�p. Tt�i,s v+rould ailow the peationer to rernove the e�dsting overhead door and install double doors or a single senrice door which vwould th�n. allow the pebtion� to remove all of the e�ds4r� asphalt driveway and mai�ain a sidewalk to the street for loading of mat�ials � in the hobby shop. The �iiy has, however� in simitar s�tuation.s in the past, allowed tv� ganages arad iwo driveways to e�dst The p�tition� is irrt�ding to remove an 8' x 10' utility shed elso bc�ted o� the pr�periy. RECOMMENDATION Statf reoommends that the Plarv�ing Commission recommend approval of special use permi� SP #96-01, with one stipulation: 1. The petititioner strall remove the �ing 8' x 10' utility shed within one year of oompletion of the garage addition. � 0 Staff Report SP #96-01, by Ronald Zac�cows{d Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. Loca�on of Property: Legal DescNptlon ofi Property: � Size: TaPo9+�P� Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Munlcipai Utilities: Vehlcular Access: Pedestrtan Access: A special use pe�mit fior a seoond garage.. 314 Hugo Stre�t N.E. Lois 29 - 32, Block A, Rivenri�v H�ghts 10,200 square fe� Sloping toward the stre.e�s (oom� lot� � _.. Typical suburban; fi�ees, sod, shrubs, e�hc. R-1, Single Family Dw�ling; Rivervi�v HeigMs; 1922 Connected Hugo and Ruth Streets N/A Englneering Issues: Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE REQUEST The pe�ittion� requests that a speaa� use penmit be granted fior a seoond garage. If ePPreved, the pe�tioner would !ae allowed to mai�in ���' x 24' eo�sting tuck-und� garage. The petitioner was rec�tl�+ 9ranted a variance � constru�t a 22' x 36' attacF�ed garage. � � ��, � n Staff Report SP #96-01, by Ror�ald Zaczkowski Page 3 PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY The subje�t parcel is loc�ed in the southeast comer of tt� irrte�tion of Hugo and Ruth Streets in the Rive�view Heights neigh�fiood. In 1�4, a 26 foot by 42 foot single iamily dwelling with a singie car �udc-urul�" slyle garage was oor�stru�ted. Also located on the property is a 8' x 10' storage shed. ANALYSIS 7t�e pe�tition� is proposing to construct a 22' x 36' aitached garage along the west side of �the split le�re! dwelling. The p�tioner has indicated that th�e e�dsti�g #uck- - und� garage wouid be used for the iamily car. The proposed garage addition would be used for a seoond . c�r, storage of a boat� and a hobby st�p. The p�itioner, as an altemative, oould u.se the tudc ur�l� garage for the hobby shop arx! store both vehicles and the boat in the nevv garage. This altemative would allow the petitioner to reduce the overhead door to a serviae door and would also .allow removai of all hardsurface in the front yard w+th the exception of a sidewalk to the street which wvuld allow toading of ma#erials ior the hobby shop arxl access to the frorrt door of the structur�. The petition� has ir�icat� tlrat he will remove the S' x 10' utility shed also located on the property. RECOMMENDATION Staff re�ommends that the Pian�ing Commission recommend app�oval of special use permit requ�t, SP #96-01, with one stipulation: 1. The petitioner shall remove the existing 8' x 10' utility shed v�.�thin one year of completion of the garage addit+an. ADJACENT SITES � V1/EST: SOUTH: EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Issues: �, _ Publlc Hearing Commerrts: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling Zoning: R-1, Single Fami�y Dwelling Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling Zoning: R-i, Single Family Dw�ling Lar� Use: Resider�af Land Use: R�iderrtial Lar� Use: Fiesiderrtia! Land Use: R�ider�tial C � February 1�, 1996 Regarding Special Use Permit To Whom It May Concern: z_.. _ My wife and I have lived at 314 Hugo St. in Fridley since 1965, 31 years. We feel this is a very stable neighborhood and we would remain in our home long after we retire. I would like to keep the tuck under garage for our family car, � gas grill and snow blower. I have obtained a variance to build a 3 stall garage. One stall I would use as the second vehicle garage and the 2nd stall for storage of boat, with the remaining space for storage for lawn care machines and hobby shop. I will remove the retaining wall along the existing drive and the � off street parking area next to Hugo Street. I will also remove a 8x10 utility shed on the south east corner of the property. The above will be completed within one year of completion of the new garage. Ronald O. Zaczkowski � � N � S P #96-01 � 314 H ugo Street l �� LOCATION MAP �- -- ----__ _"_ � �• o - 1 i'_� . � ��, , -.. .�, j ' � � _ � � �� �� � � tD a \ / � � ;� %� � •.•\�.....�.... .J .� � r . _—_ �� ____ —_ � _.__ ��._.�.._ __ . I ,_._. �-- � r1 � ;j o w 1� � . �r--1 . �..�..... � . . . . � ... �S-.�y � ( 1 . • � . , - . . . • � .. , t . . t . . �� y� r `-� , W � � 1 si � � � � , ---� _ c �' '� ;` s� � : � '- � i �_ �� `� r��� I� � . � 1 � � ; ; --f- : .� � ` � �M.�./aano��h t , t _ 1 �.______�. � , ; � � j � .`,� � � `+ j , �i � � ..��- � . • O •• . • • • . , �' � ; � � __ i � 4 ; A � , ± � ` Q �� � � ' � ,.. � + � _ .36fiOdea�µ� 7� � / I � , , � � � � � , � � 4 � � � � �' ��f � �� : , . . � - 9= ---�-�-- -q �- -�..�..�► � . ; ° I� �� � � � r � 14� � % . �� i � .�� � � �� � �� �""� � PIIBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be.a public hearing of the Fridley Planninq Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesdap,.l[arch 20, 1996 at 7a30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a special use permit, SP #96-01, by Ronald and Janet Zaczkowski, per Section 205.07.01.C.(ij of the Fridley City Code, tc allow a second accessory building in excess of 240_square feet, on Lots 29 - 32, Block A,-Riverview Heights, generally located at 314 H�go Street N.E. .� _.. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be qiven an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Community Development Department at 572-3599. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend w interpreter or other persons with disabilities auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins later than March 13, 1996. Publish: March 7, 1996 March 14, 1996 ho need an who require at 578-3500 no DAVID NEWMAN � CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION �; �� , � � �� � � �� 4 � CITY OF FRIDLEY ` 6431 UNIVERSITy AVENUE N.E. � FRIDLEY, MN 55432 .>;: :: ,:- (612) 571-3450 _ . ; � , ; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � ��r+:�. ' : . : i ;t �>-� � �� . �r:;d t - : SPECIAL�USE PE1�,MIT;APPLICATiO1� FORM .�`� - . ...;.. �, _.-.� „� '�rin +r� . �T�.: 1 K-.., a>'':...� .'.� r...�. �._� ,L.�L �...T,r,!".._� � `,. i, PROPERTy INFORiV�ATION - siteplan require for subrnrttal,-see attached � Address: ` � _ � Property Identification Num r (PIl� . Lega1 de�cription: • . . . : . - - . Lot ����• Block { �= : . T � . � � ,� . .: . �. . , ra Add�aon r r��y,� � 1 ecJ •, a!j �, ., `-:�-9 � ; .. ... . ,... . �---+—� Current zoning: e Square,footagelacrea.ge . ~ , ; �, Reason for special use permi� ��,� - �1 �=�:; e� - ` � 0.5 `'. f%e tc%Et ` ��aL -e` Qn '��1l� aS � _ j� .. =� � n o it�r�(:ode: � Have you operated a business in a city w}uch required a business license? � Yes No .,_�. If yes, which city? _ If yes, what rype of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No � � �� FEE OWNER INFORMATI N as it a ` � ,_ ( ppears on the property title) (Contract Purchase • Fee Owne must sign ' form prior to p/rocessin ) F ��4,4.,�� �� �� i r � r.'iisir�v� t,7ric� i. ��If�'� .1.Z�� . ���� - � 1'r `� l. � :, i�' � � r� � ��� � � � , � �� � � � � I � 1 r' i%'� iI �/� j'y „-,."."�;�' L%j/ d�. �' ' ` , � � ' � �� r 1 / / � � � . „ . - � �r ' / � � •�' l� ! � � �.. � /i • ! ' • �/ � w � ��L ' y _�i'���'. /� /� � ;,i �_ • /� ♦ _�', ��s.:i_ . � ' --�-�� i. • �: 1. .�� � -a �'//� �S%/ _ � :t � �.+� 1 i _ ,� . �YXi. �C`fVl/ � � - Q�� ,� F. . :�' : -�. -. � :i.. �, � - . (�j� 7 r ,_t W �� forres�tdentia.l2nd�access^�,'�•,;'-'.--��� '�.�`�,€� . . �� '. �; ... ', '�� � : -PP.�It JP 1F � � � � t,_,��ra jt r^�,� t � `� � r s r' 4 �" � M' ,s' _ ' =� w �te.ceipt �' �� � �k., �� , Appiicat�on received by y �§ . , 4r :� �.� .s�, , s �Scf�eduied Plannin Co 5,� ` � �. t , ,, g, , ��sl��� S�� �` � � �. � 4 �„ a`�,�. ,, '�. �. ''l`y ��' jy �, , ,f r -Scheduled City Council date °��:��t'��ft��4`�f�;��`� �'?���� �� ��t ��, �� �, �.�,� �_,;: � p u ,� e� � t - � � a: - t ; 5r 1' 1 ��� -� f � k ._ i � � rt y M 4 ' °t��14�� a,T`ai ��e- � � S^Y'au� a+.�''r.�'i r:�n�"sa's��.w�y � >4�L ��,e,}� ,�, r� �+a3 ,'�rn,3'r r�: .v� d�W�e..k �`'.e � � 2. � -t�t �" rSr- .. '"1�'��� S 't l�a�,,, i�y��,���u�6P �L"-'�'��{w� %'k.'�'t`�y��� ��`te3��c..� �r.. fi y� 'W �. �L �s r �- 3t C� i ' \_ � � r, �i° `4 bL �'1 a� S� 1. , Y'i � �' N' 4 1 .� n � tYs'.- v� rJ�� �a s _.ry� f�i�x ,y�$ s d-v ..t�✓ a .�.'�"� �f °�,, ?° �f ��t�`� �? � � r i �' � � ����` � �' �"'��t°f r .;�' �`�`"��.1 � 3YN i `�. '»r r�'°aP+ �-�t't �i .Y � � - '�� . , � - ° c - ;�' f +ti � ��k. . . . ' . - . SP #g�-01 Mailing List Mailed: March 1, 1996 Ronald/Janet Zaczkowski �"�' l �ald/Janet Zaczkowski 314 Hugo Street NE �ridley, NIIJ 55432 John/Marlys Dunlap or Current Resident �lii Fairmont Circle NE �ridley, l�T 55432 .Walter/Julie Streich .or Current Resident 8125 Ruth Street NE Fridley, I+Ild 55432 Geneva Gasper or Cur�ent Residen� 361 Iranton Street NE Fridley, NIIV 55432 Robert/JaniCe Fritch � `Current Resident b_.,1 Fairmont Circle Fridley, NIId 55432 Marlene Oftedahl or Current Resident 319 Ironton Street NE Fridley, 1�T � 55432 Glen/Gloria St. Cyr or Current Resident 8140 Ruth Street NE Fridley, 1�T 55432 William/.Jean Schacher or'Current Re�ident 8191 Ruth Street NE Fridley, NIIJ 55432 Renneth/Lee Ann Sporra or Cur�ent Residertt 295 Iror�tan Street NE Fridley, �T 55432 Robert/Ethel Venne or Current Resident NE 8118 Ruth Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Gregory/Brenda Hansen or Current Resident 8135 Ruth Street NE F'ridley, MPT 55432 Eleanora Paulson ,�r Current Resident 355.Ironton Street NE Fridley, NIld 55432 Michael Malmborg or Current Resident 8160 Ruth Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Darrell/Cheryl Saari or Current Resident 8181 Ruth Circle I�T� Fridle�, 1yIl�T 55432 Troy Alan i�arson. or Current Resident 311 Ironton Street NE Fridley,� 1�T 55432 Michael Melby or Current Resident 8100 Ruth Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Steven/Teresa Carlyle or Current Resident 301 Ironton Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Robert/Sharon Burris or Current Resident 8160 Ruth Circle NE Fridley, NIIJ 55432 James/Caroline Stammers or'CUrrent'Resident' � 8161 Ruth Circle NE � Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Priscilla Lamb or Curren� �es�.dent � 8131 Fairmont Circl€ NE Fr�dley, MN. 55432 Michael McLean or Current Resident 8140 Ruth Circle NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Stanley/Barbara Jones or Current Resident 8151 Ruth CirCle NE Fridley, MN 55432 Robert/Kristin Seery or Current Resident 8i21 Fairmont Circle NE Fridley, NII�T 55432 James/Mary Mitchell or Current Resident 8120 Ruth Circle ATE Fridley, NIld 55432 Gary/Audrey Scherber pouglas/Sharon Howe. Donald/Ruth Livgard or Current Resident or Current.Resident or Current Resident 8�¢5 Ruth Street NE 8171 Ruth Circle NE 8141 Ruth Circle NE F iley, NIld 55432 Fridley, 1�T 55432 Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Daniel/Martha Bernt Randall/Darlene Lobash Alfred Omlie ��� ? or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 280 Ironton Street NE 314 Ironton Street NE 360 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 D.J./S.J. Jazdzewski or Current Resident 308 Hugo Street NE Fridley, I�Il�T 55432 Marti/Nina Povlitzki or Current Resident 369 Hugo Street NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Todd/Jodi Lavine or Current Resident 350 Ironton Street NE Fridley, i�T 55432� Leonard/Linda Harris or Current Resident 350 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Debra Kay Betz or Current Resident 341 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Clarence Sporre or Current Resident 180 Hugo Street NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Cheryl Halverson or Current Resident 340 Ironton Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Ralph/Syrie Officer or Current Resident 315 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Michael/Lavonne Rennert or Current Resident 295 Hugo Street NE Fridley, NIld 55432 Carl/Dawn Jacobsen or Current Resident 358 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Christopher Rarrick or Current Resident 290 Ironton Street N� Fridley, MN 55432 J. Owen/S. McCollow or Current Resident 200 Hugo Street NE Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Ren/Diane Hausken or Current Resident 331 Hugo Street NE Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Jerry/Renee Rielblock or Current Resident 366 Ironton Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Alvin/Lisa Wasserman or Current Resident 340 Hugo Street NE Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Irene Ryan or Current Resident 355 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Terrence/Patricia Pos� ` or Current Resident 321 Hugo Street NE Fridley, NII�T 55432 James Ingalls or Current Resident 180 Ironton Street NE Fridley, NII�T 55432 Charles/Janice Seeger o� �urrent Resident 324 Ironton Street NE Fridley, I+�T 55432 Rurt Skrandies or Current Resident 311 Hugi�• Street NE - Fridley, NIl�i 55432 Mark Blegen or Current Resident 275 Ironton Street NE � Fridley, N!N 55432 - Mark/Jenifer Artman or Current Resident 304 Ironton Street NE Fridley, AIl�i 55432 Warren/Belinda Lamusga or Current Resident 195 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 David/Camilla Schultz or Current Resident 371 Hugo Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Bryan/Sandra Nelson City Council Members David Newman or Current Resident Planning Comm. Chair 190 Ironton Street NE 7635 Alden Way NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 � (� �� �� j �k� ;F 34rN."SAdn ' k. �4a ' '°�'9 �' .. � ..5± �s s 35$ F � .��4' S � J� _ _ r % �. �' �� � � r � �: ��* W �s: �i 'a'�'u'� F L�= L ��. ,,.,,� ,t T•; � .. �^,'-"...t..'��� Y.�% K ,�r .� x ��.q t� � 5_ r �1 �� a , _ _ � �. ; �.�, . �'�`5�����.v + - 3•c'.F- �6-a �� ,ir �� 4 e� ��ye ��� .uc�., � : �Y � y, :�` Y'p'ua.��i'"a',� <�''�; . J' a .� � G.a . � s f , ^'�y, r « - � ?� w � �i'� f-a '�, r a�.�, F -m,"�''" $•.z -'� ..c a`x � r� : v �,y� � 4r ,r�" �ar' �,� ��. s�°��w .is� t�2' t Sv t+� w� �' � ��tiU"i`.5.�'�'x' sr ��y.," k i7 r �'�'�,t"�+"r��� �'�';Ya . �y`�� �M"i e � f J"'�'d� �"'Rx ��,' � e< a» � ' 3 h �`' � � �v �� h �i ',,�,�r3G ��r��x �`s � *� '� t ��§.���4�r" +'� �'+� ] ��'�: x� � +, .a 2� � t t��,, �` �u aurt� k � � � �d � � x � }����� �d.•F�'t '�"GS '''�„`���'K�YR'�:3�s_ � ¢c� �,A�y � ,g� �'�c , �.� > � -K P '' ` ,s�;�`,� � t : ��„ �'v a�,�" � a F.� �.� ,= r k,� ���� .������.%Y ; ', �s. �'t, G ,�- *" �..z. �;. ,.�.� "�,�, . . � ya� - x u, ''"'�" ` d �� x � �°r �� ��aa ��_. ,� � .. : ; �S g3��"�xo.,�^'3tri% Y* � 7' ��l .,3a,.,.., �a .n^��. ^s�^ ��'K' - 't�-+c � `� �. �°�. ��,'q�-=s.�r �M� �'" � �ro ;�t `�.ain'� � � �,�, � y �:. �6�� '3!����CS ,t ��...,.��� !�:.k � r.�,:r'"`�6 . �'�[,�����'^ �� �=�',�{ . ,�i'� •�`�^ � .<?��.. - � �,"� M� � � � � y<'',�''\ r 3*p - I� �' 4�� ��/s � ' , s - � -�c.�„sy � ��'' � er�8 - �; X4 / f' � � .. �! .--L12¢ - � �3 ;;y � ° `�` s�� y � '.�z,�, ,. u. �d �� #r� �� �� �,.�,� � € -" *� �.: rac '� +t` t� v���'`� �..� � � a �4 �� � �.� r � s.`'�`'tiI � ��� ��� � �'�' x�k�' '�'� ^ e�"� '�'�a �`'z���e ' � g�'� �., �yh � r e �t, s '�� s,r� � ��� �:: j,� ,t�F' 'rti 'f 'd; t : A�''ki���'�'i �� �_"!,_5� �„�',C: _ ' � b' ' s.3 ^il JYC'�X�y�''.�"`+h��a' � k .. '�yi �� �7 �.. �CS' '�.° �� d F° 4'XT �� � ''"� ,g �" � � � � �� ��� %�� � �'�'�, � 'Nt �T 7 � u �d �y} ��++� �t # S �= p "� �r - � y� � �# �. ���x � ��'�� fi � 5'�s_,y��a `'� r�-..�,'�`�'� h �xs+i 6�`� � .. - �.mata.�•�,r,.. . �.+ ..yss��aa�. �mx .r � . �� '�� � .,,�a��� �N�� �—� �—� � �„ ��-�€ '�'�� ,� ''���,,�����.���� �'�, � �, �,. ,� �� �` ��' �� � � �`���#�°�� ��� �` ' �'� � � � � $ +� � �' � r���� ���������,� ��� �.�� ' a.'- �"�,�,� sr"�r"� ��'.��.��a er � Ya �� �s�' �' � � �..� r--i r� 4. � :t° � �- t� . aa ry i �r'� �, " � � ���m - t'� ����,�5 d- k � y k :. �3 �� �k' ��Sb S ,�.c2 �7 t i'. ^6°. . '^`�'��� ���: �` 3��,� 2 :? w��� .,:..�-���� ,�� �i� � �« �,r +�r�`°� � �+ i �.g �:y'��i?y2�;'",�.€�',u'`� � �':. �a €. .;+�,.E` 'Y"�. - � .i§ .�-�� '�� : �� 7��� � '2 Y!�s� �y�54� � �' e �t°✓�f�nY y�¢.r�r�V �� � , �,� p�� � `� '`�,,y-.. '"-� o� � "� t � �t. '� �r a-c � �.e*' �, � '��, � La" .ia`, �� �� ..! . � R 2. • � �i`J 3 � � � � �Y�" fi �� ��.�� �6�:�� � xa � � i �<iy '�, ����'�'�� �`��y���'� ? , �^• s�.,�`�.t r �` � ,� � � �c� � � �t�� � . �:.� .. � � s.„? n . �'� �r aiffid',� �����x..�, ..� �°"� �t�'�*j i � .� �, ��'�.'K,��r��'�`` r:: �c,� � _ _,. �. � _ � �`.x �'�-„ �' �,�.,,>,�s ��` ll � ,� �"� � °� � �$ $��' � � � ^�, ,�,4.E� � �S .F L�s f°2� �h�'� �+y� :�/ � �r��ra4�1 � 0� Z a� '4 ... ,,.....e�,�a.;ai:r��^w . . ... . .✓ea;: �`' 'a� al: C�c � � h � �,�.1' s -{. � "�`��r ���� � 8 a ' � ��� v�$ � � �m � . ��.,*3��y��c�f x.�n �..s,�c>..� .� .a'�i `?��uL�`'�.. � � '� �� � ���i��u�. � � �����v �`� .� ����''. a.�eg� ,".k•�,3ri� U� 't4 ,�' . m,cw 3 'g' �Y.'+� ��ne� �'�"` s��+j $�a�. �„ � ^�'"��`� �.,. '� t 5 �37 � .., �g, S*s'}°as��.�"�r.r �+� . ��y �; i g �`�� � �� R a.-?�,�k�`.��'�'� �` ,w a ;� ' y� � � � r�` � i k �'° `:��, "� � �, . ��.�,� , . � 3;. � � s ]���� � � �� ���, �$' }�,�"bi� 4 ' � � '�. 'hp 4 � . ,�, � �� �.� �f� �� �„" i � ` ' � ���`���,��� ;� � `���, � ' ..� ��C, � �����"``°.���, , X� _-„� ��� '?��'i �t � �� u�"� . .�:a. �.r. '!y , ��., � n+`�P'zr�? K. ���r � � � �.. �' _ � . � �� �, �, q�a u a` *"d��; �; � � � �� � � � 1 � � �. *� � ; � ; � �� � � .� � ., s� �,•� . ��� � ���. k � �: �'i »��,=�s•, "e a' G�sb�..._ � �� k � `°` � ��� �t� y ��a $��..�� �,�� y' 2 �� �: � � ��',��� ,.a a.` ��"'' � . � ��� ��� �,� � ,5°.t �� ��. � . ��� DESCRIPTION �OF REt�UEST: . .. � • The petition� reques�s that a lot spl"�t be eppraved fio split L�s 1� 2� and 3; � Blodc 27, Hyde Park, the same being 27fr78 58th Avenue N.E. in#o two lots. Lot A would measure 7T x 135' and have a lot area of 10,406 �uare fe�, and Lot B wauld meas�re 65' x 134.9' ar�d have a lot are�a of 8�839 square fe�. SUMMARY OF ISSIIES• "-� Issues for the Planning �ommission to cor�id� can be sumrnar¢ed as: 1. The Planning Commission wili be requaed to acla�wledge deficiencie.s in Lot B, a reduction in the required lot width from 80 feet to 65 feet, and a reduction in the required lot area from 9,000 square feet to 8,� square feet. 2. The City's action wiil cre�ate a"s�nrapping� of nor�cor�rming setbacks. Currer�tly, the pr�operty does not meet the required rear yard setback. S'hould #he �t split be approved, the r�uired frorrt yard setback will not be met by the existing dwelling. 3. The detached fi�o car 9ara9e locat�d on the pancel wili be lo�ted on a �ewlY-�PPraoved vacant lot should the variance !� gianted. The City Code does �raot � atlow acxessory structures to be Jocated on a lot prior to the prinapal structure (Sectiion 205.04.05.A). RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recomm�ds that the Planning Commission reoommend approval of the bt split request The Pianning Commission should admowledge that Lot B does not mee�t the minimum lot width or lot are�a requir�nents frn the R-1, Single Family Dwelling disiricto Staff recomm�nds the following stipulafions as a condition of approwal: 1. The petitioner acknowledges � the Cit�s acfion creates a noncor�forming frorrt yar+d setback. 2. The petitioner shall remove the garage located on Lot B. 3. The pe�tition� acknowledges that Lot B tms a long, narrow bcu'Idable area and st�all design a house to frt tt� area. , . � � � o� Staff Report LS. #96-01, by Valley Irnrestrnent Co. Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. Locatlon � of Property: Legal DescMptton of Property: Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access• Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: REQUEST A�t spl'�t to cre�ate a single family lot 276-78 58tl� Av�ue N.E. Lots 1, 2, and 3� Blodc 27, Hyde Park, toge�her vvitfi all that part a# the vac�#ed alley lying west of said lofs and lying beRwe� the Wes#eriy e�ctension� of the North line pf �said � Lot -1, �and the Wesierly. extension .of the Souuttt line of said Lot 3. ' � .� .. � - � .� : . 14244' x 134.91' 19,216.6 square feet � Typical �burban; tre�, sod� shrubs, etc. S-1, Hyde Park; 1�6 Located in 58th Av�ue 58�h Av�ue; 3rd Street N/A N/A �, n ,� ,.. me Petitianer' reques�s tha# the Planr�ing Corx�mission and �C1ty Counci! approve a lo# split to split ..;K Lots 1, 2, and 3, Blodc 27� Hyde Park� .the same being 27&78 5Bth Avertue N.E. into iwn lots: : �°� ��: Lot A w�nuid measure TI' x 135' and have a°1ot area of 10,406 : 9qtrare feert, � and Lot B would �5i :.�"'� measure 65' x 134.9' and F�ave a 1ot area of � � �uar±e fee�. � � Staff Report LS. #96-01, Page 3 � by Valley Irnestrn�t Co. PROPERTY DESCRIPT10NM1STORY The prop�ly was origir�ally platted in 1�6, �nd �zoned R-2� Tvrro Family Owr�lin9. In 1959� a 32' x 74' duplex was oo�ed on the properiy. In 1970, the � was rezoned trom R 2, Tvu� Family Dwelling to G2� Ger�eral Business. In 1978� the Ciiy es�ablished a special district, �titled °S-1 � Hyde P�rk Distric�'. The irrtent of the S-1 distrid is to �oow�age residential irnestrnent end redevelopmerrt of commercial prope�ti� to residential uses {�ngle tamily) in the Hyde Park area. Building permit activiiy on the parcel indudes the fiollowing: 1960 - Gor�st�lion of a 22' x 23' �de�ted garage. 1970 - Construction of a 12' x 20 addition 1977 - Construction of an 8' x 12' de.c�c 1981 - Construction of a 16' x 9�' deck � In � 1�6, the issue of a lot sptit was first r�earched by staff at the r�uest of the pr�c�us properiy owner�, the Brodets. . � ,�a�.vsis The subject p�rcel measures 19,21� square feet. The proposed lot split would create #v� lots; Lot A on which the e�asting duplex wouid be la�ted measuring T!' x 135' and Frav+ng a lot area c�f 10,4� square f�t, and Lot B m�uing 65' x 134' and txiving a lot area of 8�839 square fest. Lot A meets the minimum lo#. area req�irernents ior a duple�c iot, end also me�s the mirnmum lot width r�uir�nents. Lot B, t�wever, is defia�t in lot width; 65 feet versus � feet, and also ' deficierrt in lot are�a, 8,839 square feet versus 9,�00 square feet. The Pk�nning Comm�ssion, should the lot split be approved, will need to acknowledge these deficie�aes. - Locxited on the westerly portion of the parc� is a iwro lamily dw�ling. During the 1986 ar�al�is by staff, it was determined tF� 3r+d Street, because it is the sl�rt� ironhage� wa.s the irorrt yard regerdiess that the prop�ij► was addr�sed irom 58th Avenue. �he dweUing is loc.ated 13.5 fee� from the west�iy lot li�e, which woould be oonsid�ed the t�r yacd # 3rd Street is the fror�t yard. As a r�ult of this deterrnir�tion, the prop�ty cxur�tly has .a nonconforming r�r yard se�back. The re�ar yard requirement is 35.61 fee�. If the lot split is appr+�ved, 58th Avenue wil! beoome the front yar+d. The duplex is located 14 f�t from �e proper#y line. This is nonoonforming. The City's action witl cause a°swapping° of nonc�Mormiti�. The e�asbng duplex currently util'¢es both an a�ached garage tacing 58th Avenue as weN as the detac�ed garage adjac�t to 3rd Slreet .. .�f:: #he �t.;:spUt is ,apprpved, ;#Me de�ached 9ara9e wiil be �1nc�ted on the newly�ed vac�r�t lot r, „�e duplex is required ., � prrovide fiour parkir� s�lls. .,, . .is can be a000mt�nodated bY P��9 tad :d'�#iorral 'P��9 :�1�'�`� .�'��� `9�9e °f #� �': , duplex. The detached 9ar�a9e cannot °�-�°ailowed':�:�+ernair� on the. vac�t ProPertY. '� Sec,�on ;� �� 205.04.05A of the Fridl�t City-�Code states,`'�'No;:accessory.:�bWiding:'or::�ne sl�ll be pe�mi�ed �; St�aff Report 9 LS. #96-01, by Valley Irn�trnent Co. Page 4 on a�ry lot prior to the time of the issuance of �he b�.dlding p�ni# fi�r the construc�on of the principle building." The petition� could rela�te the detac�ed garage on#o Parcel A; however, this would incxease the lot coverage from 25% to 28%, requiring a var� prior to retocation of the garage. RECOMMENDATION S`taff reoommends that the pianning Commis�on recommer� epproval of the lo# spfit request. The Pk�nning Commission should acf�owledge that Lot B does not m�t. the minimum lot width or �t area requiremerrts •for the. R-1, Single Family Dw�ling district.� Staff recommends the ioliowing . . stipulatior�s as a condition of approval: ` ' � 1. ��petition� aclmowledges that the City's action creates e noncor�inrming seteadc in the Y�• 2 The peiition� shali r�nove the garage �locxited on Lot B. ~ 3. The pebtioner acknowledges that Lot B has a long� r�art�ow buildable area and shall desic�n a house to fit that area. ADJACENT SITES WEST: SOUTH: EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Pu61ic Hearing Comments: Zoning: S-1, Hyde Park Zoning: S-1, Hyde Park Zoning: Zoning: LarKi Use: Duplex LaruJ Use: Single Family S-1, Hyde Park Land Use: Vacant Commer+cial/ Redevelopment site �1, Hyde Park Land Use: Single Famify � �: � LS #96-01 276-78� 58th Avenue -LOCATION MAP � � � �. / C. E. COULTER & ASSOCIATES, INC. JOEN t�OULTfsR PET�ILSON PROFESSIONAL REGISTERED LAND SURVEY4RS 88GLS`l�RBD IN J(W11L, �� IO�d LlC�1lSBD IX LRTY 0�' �lPOLiS P.O. 80X 89� !�lNNEAPOUS, �IINNESOTA 554U8-0900 � Pi�ONE (612) 824-0310 � FAX (612) 953 3474 s� � - Q. 30 80 80 Feet ��� 58TH AVENUE N.E. 142.44 S89'24'56�F ; �� . , l � ; : =;T ---rr.ov--- --- � w � -� po�cs a��; °BCU . . . �C _,� ; � �11.7 '.'d` GAR. �� � . t9 � �, yAi �'' "� t"� �•� i 12.0 . . ---- �- W . �; � �Q f-- � �' � v� � " o a �' � �a o � A .-� O .�;,u «�.4 Z �Q+ 1 . � 1 � Y i •-=j ;�C E+ � ' a � a ':�' V�y ��,� ,�, �� ` 4. � . ZO.� �n � � DECK 21.6 ._ 8' CHAIN LINK 85.44 ' ' : ' !� a r� m� �W �� 'd� d, : , �— W �� . O �"� �n ° M� �-, Qo z z� z3.s �v� � Gatt. � � �� .: H w a'� .�-� v� „ +� � N o � �d `"� CO _, o .: � � a 0 0 .� � �� - ,� W �z � � � � x L'� . � � , .. . �i'.� � 11.84�: � � :•12.80 --,77.0� --- -- ; `� 65.54 .�..;; -18.9U =! � a ' �.42 54 ; � �. �=- . � � _ � " 10.14�, t � � � , N89'22 35 �P � �, a.�4 ----- ---% � � m 28.3 NOTES: DENOTES PROPE '� C � _ R'!'X ORNEIt. 17.0 1—STORY 1 _• DENUTES FENCE LINE. 3, LEGAL AESCSIP770N: 1POdD FB„AME 2-�—�t- ;�. � N0. 5770 3 P��EL CONTAINS 15.245 ��UARE :� Lots i. 2�C 3. $loak 27. B,yde Park. . Moka � FEET. _ . County� .Ninneaota� together with all #hat part oi 4� ALL HEARINGS SHU1lN ARE.°�SSUMED , tLe vacate� elley 1yin� lPest of said lvts. and �j►inB DATUM. . �, between the 1Festerly. eztension o! the North line -� of said Lat 1, e►ad�the 1Peeterlrv erteneioD of the NOTE: T�S 3URVEY CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALIj?� 1PITHOUT y $outh line ot sai�rl;o�-� :��� ,p.. :., .: AN ORlGINAL SIGNATURE AND A RAISED'•SEAL.� . . ,�,�:� . �, �T, A P jri ��.� .. - . . � .. _ _ " ' �OPYRIGHT �C :1998. C E CO[iLTER �e ASSOCIATES, INC. ` „ � �• �.... ... , . '� - , �,-1 �lGl\1/Y'1n m�{/LUI'L�Cya � n��up9pt�.-�P,Q'�cp�����qq/•1' i,�y�;oAy 1�lii"V�j �AN''�1AIYfd/ Lpin,,,._.� :r .; •� . ,.P:.r >°.�-;`i'�►�7� �;"�"j r i , -::i t-�'_ rt ': �.. Y aL� �A YIWirR a, WA�4j, Yv� iYi�fe711/1��MY �� lAfl� ����44 r�':-��YLI J��1VM�71�[�J/ YWi'i1:�i _:���;RIM7{ . �LQMiL! �/ .� �W 'S 1 rf�' '' � . . :�Ba�►1[6 �Fe•��1'A7B pF :1�AV�01'a. ,>:. k � . . . � v, . r - � «<.., , ° JOB N01,;11.554 ;�� 3, �. S�'.4L& !' — SD', � 'DATE: 1 J96 �� - -� `� `� yP y"13782: . ,:.. � �. -N0 �/� 763/50--� } S8&J�T 1 OF �E �- � �■� , � �� C.� E. COULTER & ASSOCIATES, INC. ` JOBN COULTER PETER�SDN PROFESSIONAL REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS , x�crs� �r �r.. �sc. � lox� t�c�vs�n � crrY oF �oLrs P.O. Hi1X $90Q� I�INNEAPOIIS� �INNES�TA 55408-0900 PNONE� (612) 824-037Q FAX {612) 953-3D74 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: The West 65 feet of Lots 1, 2& 3, 81ock 27� Hyde Park� Ano%a Cotuxt�. 1VIinnPsotas .•8S• IY1�aSL2�'�d, �.I4I!II�. �the 11�oxth�� li�� of said Lat .1, and along the Sou�h li�e af said Lot 3, together with all that part of the vaeated alley lying � 't+Peat of : eaid lots, and lying bet�reen the YPesterly egtension of _ the'.North line of said Lot 1, and the 'f�Vesterly extension of the South lin� of said Lo�.3. '. Parcel A contains iQ.4Ufi square feet. PAIRCEL B: That part of Lot 1, � 2& 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, Anoka . , County, :Minuesota, lying East of th�: West 65 feet thereof as measured along : the North line of said Lo� 1 and along the South line of said Lo� 3. Pascel B cc�ntaiz�s S,Q3g square feet. �- - . , . ., . . ., . - . . ,� . . ., : , . . . , _ , ,, , , ; �. . _ 1L[�LDI VPi{�t1Cl iiia��lYSralViti�Dlj i"Yft\�„QA •�D�,q6� r�YGTMi,i�. Ll. ..�. �. :. . � :. a�. ,;; �eLr.Br �:,s�xY �nrC ;: .. 48 UNDF,B YY Di�.9' .S�1P . t1�(D '1�AT I; AM A BOLY �6� ; ,,�: : _:� .,e(� SU�BYOB �I��'i�B S"fATB 4F�:ltII�4�OTA. `` . «..� , , ;. , - :�'"` ` � � JDB �ii0. { 11.554 4 SCALE. 1 ` 30' ��.- . . 2 1 9. ' "' . . , , � �"�: � : ,',: ,,a �:�4 . ` �� 13792 4 �Y ? ` B� � 763 5tJ— .. ' AATB: ; � y * , BEG. NO `" /PG ', / ; 52 ;' SBL�L7' Z;:.. ' OA :2 ` ; �, is ' � , �� f_. �� ;�'- � � , � FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNiVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 March 4, 1996 To Whom !t May Concenr. The City of Fridley Planning Commission will be holding an ir�formal hearing on a!ot split request, L.S. #96-01, by Valley Investmerrt Co., to split Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, together with a(I that part of the vacated alley lying west of said lots and lying between the Westeriy extension of the North line of said Lot 1, and the Westeriy extension of the South line of said Lot 3 irrto two parcels as described: Parcel A. The West 65 feet of Lot 1� 2, and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, Anoka C.ounty, Minnesota, as measur� along the North line of said Lot 1, and along the South line of said Lot 3, together with aU that part of the vacated alley lying West of said lots, and lying ,-� between the Westerry extension of the North line of said Lot 1, and the Westerly extension of the South Iine of said Lot 3. Parcel B. That part of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of the West 65 feet thereof as measured along the North line of said Lot 1 and along the South line of said ; Lot 3. � This property is generally lorated at 276-78 58th Avenue NE. - Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, March 20� 199fi at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. at 7:� p.m. Any questions refated to this item may be referred to the Community Development Department at 572-3599. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabiiities who require a�ociliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than March 13, 1996. DAVID NEWMAN CHAIR � PLANNING COMMiSSION CITY OF FP.IDLEY TEL� 612-571-1287 r'`1 C`I'l'Y QC' F[2IULL:1�' C�1.�1 �]NIV�FtSITY AVi�.I''vTIIE N.E. FRiL�L�.Y,1ViN SS=132 �"� Feb 15,96 15�26 Ido.013 P.02�2� {612} 571-345� COMMUI\TITY �EVk:i..Cl��MENT �EPAR'�'M1��NT L(�T SFI.Y�' AF'p�,���hTYC�►N Ft��M I'ItO�"�RT . INI�'OItMATI l�t.- site plan r�quired for sub�t�ittal; sce attacl�c�. Adct�..7���7�y �-� C�L ,lU,.�. . .. . ... .. O Pyo�cit.y IdcEltiflr��ti�n Nurr�ber (PiN)• Z3�� . _?-�CDfl.9�' . . . � I.eg:;l ciescri�ytiott: ��S % � d'S. ._ �� 2-� , ' — Lt�t _ . __ Block � TrxctlAdditic�n _ . . � G�u•1•cr�t zanin�: ,��,� ����� Sc�u<u-e fc�c�tag�J�tcreagc _ _ � �e.��sc�t� for Iat. s�fit: _ _ , ... . . - - t �� �! �-� - ``�`��- - Have you c��cratcc� a bt�s�n�ss i.n ��:�ty wliicti rec�uir�ci a busine�s Iicens�?' Yes No _,}� Tf ye�, w��ich eiry? ... . If ye.5, what ty�� c�f busit�es�? __ .. _ .— Was tht+t lic�nse cvcr c�r.nicd ar rcvc�ked? Ye�; _ ... No ,..,...���.,...�.�....�.,�� � , . _: _...�.__....._w__...._: �x,.,..,, .,.,..�_w,...�..�...-.......�__......_�_�_s_.....�.�.aw...,.,,..........,...-�....,.�..�,._,�....�.� k'�;E (�WNLlt 1N1{'C1R�1A7'�t�I (�s it a�a��e�rs an tl�c �rQperty titic) (C�nU•��ct PurGl��a�cr : F�c C)w�ic.rs �nt st si�n ihis fc�rn3 rior to prc�ccssing) N����: �.� .._ . �'� �o�'�'%h��>�9�'G . A.nD�2FS5 3p / � _ .' , DAY'1'iMLs Y[TONE �("���-". �'6� f .. T�ATE�o� /�%h , SiGNATLIR _... �rp��ti����i�wr�.MNO�M/��irM�+ W�:�N twv�.r�w����s.�'w.N�IN�r�•Ne�1 �f.rr���isW'v'v.�.4-ML+��i-+.�> f�l�+r"- P1�`I't'I'IC1P�I�CR INrU�1V�ATt . NAM� . .. AL�r�R r�:� 13A'Y`t'IMF PHt3I�E_ -. — �It;NA'CIIItH; DA'I'E A�tl�V�w1�+.�"MW/�+hW�+���rw:�4�9�.4Yr'-Wr�0�0 4�4MrV� NM'�/'��M1•�NAM+.•+NU�+ev+w��i.r�r��YJ�1i.h W�r�NI��/� IM�/���kMl ��� �'cc: $25o.(IV �/ .. ^ Per7ttit L.S. # ,. �((,p ,� ) . Rcccipt # 7 Ap��lic:��tic�:� rec�ived by: .. ln� ' . Sc:hectul�.ci Plxnnir�� Ct��t�missior� date: _ �'U �' IiC�.P� ' . >�l �-�CP_ � Sche.�tulcd City Cc�uncil ci��te: _ - . . � � , �� �: ;+ L.S. #96-01 Mailing List Mailed: March 1, �99�6� Valley Investment Co. Valley Investment Co. 5730 Duluth Street Minneapolis, NII�T 55422 Martin/Emily Dykhoff or Current Resident 5810 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 D�1/Peggy Price. . or'Current�Resident . 5821 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, IMIId 55432 Current Resident 280 - 57th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 262 - 57th Place NE Fridley, NIlJ 55432 William/Ora Talley or Current Resident 281 - 57th Place NE Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 251 - 57th Place NE Fridley, I�T 55432 D. Knopik/ V. Young or Current Resident 5801 - 2 1/2 Street Fridley, P�Il�T 55432 David/I�urnel Landrus or Current Resident 5775 - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, NIld 55432 Lucille Bodin or Current Resident 5824 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Darothy, . Mayez . . �. or Current R�esident 5807 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, NII�T 55432 1985 Property Co. 1317 Burning Wood Way Madison, WI 537a4 Pizza Huts of NW Inc. 9111 E Douglas PO Box 428 Wichita, KS 67201 Kathleen Harvet or Current Resident 271 - 57th Place NE Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Viola Pfieffer or Current Resident 5817 - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, 1�Il�T 55432 Louise/Gerald Almlie or Current Resident. 5826 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, I+�T 55432 .. John Orlando'. � or Current Resident 5805 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Reith Raveling or Current Resident 5813 - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Mildred Barker or Current Resident NE 5800 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 S & A Development Co. 3400 East 42nd Street Minneapolis, NIl�T 55406 P. Slesar/C. Wood or Current�-Resident 4 4; Locke Lake _ itoad Fridiey, I+�T 55432 Irving/Efron Herman or Current Resident � 5735 Quincy Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 255 - 57th Avenue NE ^ Fridley, i�1 55432 Hyo Shilc Chong/Ja In 3401 - 78th Ave7iue No. Brooklyn Pk, 1+Il�T 55443 - Lyle/Denise Janz or Current Resident 5807 - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, rIlJ 55432 Current Resident 577U - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Current Resident 5780 - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, PIl�T 55432 � B�uce �undberg Albin/Ebba Johnson Current Resident or Current Resident 2977 - 243th Street 5800 - 2 1/2 Street NE 5815 - 2nd Street NE Cushing, WI 54006 Fridley, NIN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 I�lie Gilbertson c Current Resident 5810 - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Jerry/Barbara McNurlin 250 Sylvan Lane 1dE Fridley, PIl�T 55432 Current Resident 5820 - 2 1/2 Street NE Fridley, I�T 55432 �harles/Luella Lindberg Angela Wax Current Resident or Current Resident 612 - 22nd Avenue NE 5821 - 2 1/2 Street NE 5825 - 2 1/2 Street NE Minneapolis, I�i 55418 Fridley, NIld 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Violet Rocek Current Resident Raymond/Dorothy Hegna_ 597 - 10th Avenue SW 5791 - 2 1/2 Street NE. . or Current Resident New Brighton, NIlJ 55112- Rridley, MN � 55432 � `' 5770 .- 3rd Street �TE � Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Meyer/Joanne Broder or Current Resident 278 - 58�h Avenus NE Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 232 - 58th Avenue NE F�lley, MN 55432 Jerry Finkelstein 4319 Cedarwood Road St. Louis Pk, NIIJ 55416 'il. Brantner/A. Bates 1028 - 42 1/2 Avenue NE Columbia Hghts, NIIJ 55421 Paul/Diane Beall or Current Resident 261 - 57th Place NE Fridley, MN 55432 David Newman Planning Comm. Chair 7635 Alden Way NE Fr�idley, MN 55432 Charles Fischer or Current Resident 248 - 58th �lvent�e IdE F�idley, NIl�T 55432 �avid/Robin �Ieryla 1000 Polk Place Columbia Hghts, MN 55421 Current Resident 5801 - 2nd Street Fridley, 1�Ild 55432 D Jensen/ D Wollenburg 5027 - 5th Street NE Minneapb-�is, NIIJ �-5421 Current Resident 5761 - 2nd Street NE Fridley, NIlST 55432 Richard/Sonia Peterson IdE or Current Resident 247�- 57th Place NE Fridley, MN 55432 , Current Resident 5783 - 2 1/2 Street Fridley, I+Il�T 55432 Ernest Sergstrom NE or Current i.tes ident 5760 - 3rd Street NE Fridley, I+Il�T 55432 Edward/Anne Andrajack or Current Resident 5832 - 3rd Street.NE Fridley, MN 55432 City Council Members � ��Y.<�t'+�`-..�. ��-. � s�,� '��� ,a� s t� � � � 9 � ,� � i � [ .� �- '-s�� ��� ��'� � a � � � e����g �f+�i'��'�e�����.�`�,� � ��'�����s °'�� '�ik�����,� � s�,� ,� 4�. `�r� $a:+� � �'����`' �t `�"�k i� �� � � �F � . ,� �•.,; Q'�� �` "°� . � �` � `r� � �� � � � � � �z � � � ,�,� ���: ��t �r� � �`;`�� �� � ,:E €`',�' "� ,�,�,�%tr�.�'' �. � �� �, � ���,� � ,y�rr x ����". � . ,� F � ,�^`,�� P% < �.,.� <� � � •�� < :'�� � a ^,..is3,.'�.�i`��..,��,�4.� .., .:�z �� .� r��� ti �p�'e •y � ��� �i i�E; : �NA � � ? � � ��a i � ':: �i 4 �.Xmi: ��. ., � ��: fY{d.Yi ,�'� ".' �+.4 CI � �� �� =-� � ��r� �'I � s 3,� . � ?- _ ..:T '�f.w�'�:.t ..t ■ ... , ._ . .. L�e..+Y� DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: . . � The petition� requests that a portion �of a drairrage and utitiiy e�asem�t located on Lot 7, Block 1, Totino Grace Addition be vacated. If approved, the vacation would aliow construction of a single tamily dwelling. . � SUMMARY OF ISSUES- � _._ The purpose of the drainage and uHiity ease�nent was to provide a buffer around the protecte�l wetland located on the site. The pe�tiifiione�s de.sign� a dwelling for a clierrt which do� r�t fit within the buildabie portion of the lot as defined by the setbacks and e�asemerits. The drainage anci utility easemerrt aids the City in �#or+cing stipulations placed on the subdivision. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends tFrat the Planning Commission recommend denial of the vacation request to the City Councii, as the drainage ar� util'�tyy easeme,r�# provides additior�al buff�ing and protection for t�he protecteti wedand i�ated on the prr�perty. S�taff Report SAV #96-01, by Roya1 Oa{cs R� Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS PROJECT DETAILS Petitton Po� Vacation of a portion of a drainage and utility easern�t. Location 1435 Royal O�k Court N.E. of Property: Legal Desc�Iption oi Property: Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access• Pedestrian Access: Englneering Issues: Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE ANALYSIS Lot 7, .Blocic 1� Totino-Grnc,e Additian �� • Some�art� rolling; wetlar�d in northe�a.st corner qf the ProP�Y• Oak trees R-1, Single Family Dwelling; TotinaGrace Addition; 1994 In Royal Oak Court Royal Oak Court N/A Provide adequate buffering ior wetland � � � � ,;; � F, � staff Report SAV #96-01, by Royal Oaks Realty �—.� Page 3 REQUEST The peetition� requests that a portion of a drair�age and utility easement located on Lot 7, Block 1� Totino C,r�ace Addition be vac�ted in order � atbw construc�on of a single family dw�ling unit PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY . The subject, par�cei is located in a subdiyision recen�y platted .in 19.94. The . • � � . �subdivision is located �adjacent to •Totirx� Crace'High Scl�ool and .near. en �establ'�shed� residential district Durirag �e subdivision proeess� the neighbort�ood testified that the existing tre� and wetlands we,re significant environm�i �r�es� and that the proposed subdivision �rould advers�y impact this re�nnant of wfiat is {movm as "P�k's Woods�. As a result. of the n�ghbofiood testimor�y� the Ciiy Council� at the recommendation of tl� �Plarming Commis�sion, eslabl'� 22 stip�ions in#end�ng #o pro#ect the natur�l features to the gre�at�t e�errt p�ibie. These u�cluded conditions regarding tree cutting, tree preservation, g�ing limits, co�cfion limits, an�f the placement of dwellings. � ANALYSIS The petitionei's proposal would vacate a portion of �e west�iy por�on of a drainage and utility �asement wfiich, on the plat, surrour�s a protected Type 3 wetland located in the northe�ast comer of the subject properly. The drair�age and util'ity easemerrt do� not corrtain ar�y Gty utiliti�. The vacation of this portion of the easemerrt would �sentially move the protected area of the wedand dos� to the wetland edge. This easement was d�iicat�i on the plat at the recomm�ndation of the registered land surveyor and based on a we�and delineation by Ms. Pat Arlig. The delineation of wetlands is not an exact science; th�ie�fiore, pr+�viding an ample buff� is appropriate. The vaca#io� of the e�asemerrt would reduce the buff� to the we�ar� from 7 feet #o appro�amately .1.5 fieet To make s�e of adequate protection of the we�tland, the wider buff� provid� by the drainage and utility e�asem�t should be mair�tained. The vacation request is a r�ult of the petififion� designing a dw�Ung for a dient which is k�rg� than the buildable area on the lot wh� s�dcs and easemerri�s are oor�sidered. it would have been� more appropriate trad the designers s�arted with a buildable area arxf designed the house to fit within the site constrairrts. Cons�on has begun on the lot� eliminating the low� foundation of the garage which would �croach irrto the e�asement The garage is c:antil�►ered over the e�sem�t. � RECOMMENDATION As the drainage and utility e�asem�rt pro�ides additia�al bu�ering and protection of the rratur�al �vironment, i.a dthe: wetland,� s1�ff ;recamm�d� :that the Plar�ing ,. Staff Report SAV #96-01, by Roya! Oaks Realty Page 4 Commission recommend denial oi the request to vacate a portior� ofi a drainage and utility easemerrt. ADJACENT SITES WEST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling Land Use: School SOUTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling Land Use: Residential EAST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling Land Use: Residerrtial. NORTH: Zoning: R-1, Singie Family Dwelling Land Use: School Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: � _.. �, n n �� �. ,.:; SAV #96-01 Royal Oaks Realty LOCATION MAP ��� � � � � �� �� O� ��� ��� FOR: Marcel Eibensteiner ► 1 1 1 95z88 C7' . ` �' T� Z Rear �G� � � G � r a .�1�C ' P� �N � Z a S '7,3�, 44» W g6.5�� �AreQ ° § �asement tO be Vocated i _ � V�btl� Dalin t �o� �'�$ o � ` Y� C ���� �. o,�,� � = �2°00'27" R = 205.p0 NOi?TH nt LTne " Delineation point '-� iNeti�d Deltn� per Pat Ar11g s�.01 Aprif 29, 1994 Diag.: 94.1 x 48.7 = 105.95 i�I � � PROPOSFD ELEVATIONS: 02 DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION. GARAGE FLOOR �963.5 X1011.2 OENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. TOP OF BLOCK =963.8 / DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE. LOWEST FLOOR =953.7 � DENOTES WOOD HUB AT 11 FOOT OFFSET. & 955.0 13 crs wo Lot 7, Block 1, TOTINO GRACE ADDlTION, Anoka County, Minnesota. Scale 1"= 30' O Denotes, Iron Mon. Bearin Datum: Assumed Job No. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct represen#ation of a survey of the boundaries of the above desc�ibed land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments� if any, from o� on said land. - 8 ���� D a t e d t h i s �5th d a y o f Februar y 1 9 9 6 M i n n e s o t a L i c e n s e N o. s s o s �55ti5t31 �Drwg By BAO LDisk� , , �. C! �i� � �, ��. inMl�{V �rf� 1r�"i ! VliO <. �w 81� LEX1NGt�t AYL. NO. . ; � ctac.�.e PiNea, Mttv�tesora � bbP�i�-3625 tEL. '186-68�6 '' �� 9 S�k�tc� � ��s�ri tio� �Easement Vacation across Lot 7, Block 1, %"� th Li�e �f ��t ' �? TOTINO GRA E ADDITIOPI, Anoka County, Minnesota Nor »� N 87�8'25" W NO�?T� 1 S ��g6'S5 � • s� —' — -- -1 �'� 1 �i � ��� / �� , I � _ ; �'�, \ �. y � I s .. t a,� \ ` a��' $@` � I5 �� . . ' \ � . . .. • • oo�,+� ���� ',_ ------- Z c^ : �� —�- �� \ � 4 ` I 4� Z 5 � �' � . ,,'� `� I � \ � s� � I � � � �1 �.S c0 � ��`-'pp \\ "< p �p °oa ° 1\ � � N-� \ � ��� � I � � \ � s � fi � � �� Z� \ �So 00 � .`` ` ooa � �.�, F '--- 51�.- — -- ��/ � I \ \ � �� � � � p ' so.95 �— — — �J" R 50 DO 4„ � t �o�� � = 42.96 � o �,2�oo�z�» ���! /� � R = 205.00 Vrr DESCRlPTION FOR EASEMENT VACATION: That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 7. Block 1. TOTINO GRACE ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota described as foltows: � �o no O O � •S � �/ �'�� �� o� �vy 9� z _. �9 SF �F ti� Wetland Delinea# per Pat Arlig April 29, 1994 Beginning at a point on the north I'�ne of said Lot 7 distant 65.90 feet east from the northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence on an assumed bearing of South 28 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along the west line of said drainage and utilifiy easement 64.13 feet; thence South 38 degrees 00 minutes East 32.00 feeC; thence North 24 Degrees 16 Minutes 58 Seconds West 92.&3 feet to a point on said north line distant 12 feet east of said point of beginning; thence South 77 deg�ees 3i minutes 44 seconds West i200 feet to the point of begin�ing. Except the north 5 feet thereof. I�;eby certify that this survey, plan. or r. rt was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surve�ror under the laws of the ta of i �es Date 2-15'� Registration No 980e �. C�.1�D � �, IA:.r"/ LANO SUR1rEYORB 918P� LEX(NGTON 1l�VE. NO. GIRCLE PINEa, MI1MtE807A 5bP�1�-362b TEL. 18ro-6�56 R �� i �o,��� ���� �� �\ REALTY, INC. February 16, 1996 Mr. Scott Hickok Planning Coordinator City of Fridley 643 i University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432-4383 I�ear 1VIr. Hickok: � Imperial Homes, Inc. will be constructing a new home on Lot 7, Block � 1, Totino Grace Addition for Bob and Cheryl Horeck. The house will be constructed within all front, side and rear set back lines. We are, however, requesting the City to vacate a portion of the existing drainage easement on the northeasterly portion of the lot. Attached are two drawings explaining our intentions. The first drawing shows the existing conditions of the property and the proposed house location. The second drawing shows the easement area to be vacated and legal descriprion. The construction of this home and the vacation of the easement will not be a negarive impact on the subject properiy or surrounding properties for the following reasons: • The new easement line will still be above the 100 year flood elevation of the adjacent pond (951.0') • The new easement line will be above the wetiand delineation line � � • There will be no grading below the 953' contour � The rear yard lowest walk out elevation will be at the 955.0' elevation (four feet above the 100 yea.r pond elevation) � 4196 Lexington Avenue • Shoreview, Minnesota 55i26 •(612) 483-5518 • Fax (612) 483-5642 � � � In retrospect, the drainage easement provid� on this lot was wider or larger in area that what was actua.11y needed to protect the natural conditions of the property. Vacating only a small portion of this easement will allow Mr. and Mrs. Horeck to construct their "dream home" custom designed to fit this lot. Tha.nk you for your consideration. Yours .truly, � .I�.� ��...�� . � . � . Michael J. Black, Project Mana.ger Land Development Division � � � xz 4 � $� r�„�.�'� �?"��„?',.�.'�� � 3 � .' �....; ��w • � , � FRIDLEY MUNIC[PAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 March 4, 199G To Whom it May Concem: The City of Fridley Planning Commission will be holding an ir�formal hearing on a vacation request, SAV #96-01, by imperial Homes, Inc., to vacate that part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on Lot 7, Block 1, Totino Grace Addition, -� described as foilows: Beginning at a poirrt on the north line of said Lot 7 distant 65.10 feet east from the northwest comer of said Lot 7; thence on an assumed bearing of South 28 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along the west line of said drainage and utility easemerrt 64.13 f�t; thence South 38 degrees 00 minutes East 32.00 f�t; thence North 24 Degrees 16 Minutes 58 Seconds West 92.6:i f�t to a � point on said north line distant 12 feet east of said point of beginning; thence South 77 degrees 31 minutes 44 seconds West 12.00 feet to the point of beginning. Except the north 5 feet thereof, generally located at 1435 Royal Oak Gourt NE. Any and aA persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the Planning Commission meeting on We�lnesday, March 20, 1996 at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. Any qu�tions related to this item may be referred to the Community Developmerrt Department at 572-3599. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpret� or other persons with disabilities who require a�ndliary aids should corrtact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than March 13, 199G. DAVID NEWMAN CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION s' n � � } � CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E: - . . �'RIDLEY, MN 55432 , `�.° ��.� , '� ar i. (612)�571-3450' >�53=;COMMIINITY.: DEVELOPM�NT��� � � � �� � � �� � vACATION���4PPLICATI(�1� �0; _ � . . -. .... . .. _., : ,- - :" r �:: a � .: v� i :�i a'� { i�,.�+'� � !# � `� � ., .- PROPER�Y� iNFORMA�ION .si�e ��.an req��d�for st�� � s �,p � ��` , - `' ., ?�. ��r� ,} t � ` s,° T SF.. �RTMENT�r��������}��,�,� � �, � t��� _,, :; .,;,7x �� t�, �4�� �e:li �_. . . .t,,r `. . . . '.:Y; �.���' .,.. '. ..-.K . . , � .a:'.. ,. it.�j, .. ,• � r �pp �� t� .r���4. ...�t ;�^i: V�'N '4 �:�:� yn t-,' :'t P,u.4tr ..1 t t;� , �� l ) / �b 1 `: • I � . � // //� r. r � -:: . �•��(p �...:3 � A{q 1�P.i.. At yf tw: y � �r 's� t >�' i� t ��.:. � P:.:. � �n, • I I ' ■ 1� � � i - ��,d�� ':._V� �� �� %1 i '1' K i§{ t`� 41�_ {, � Address: � _ �� �. , . <, , � � ,.� , �. Property Identification Number (PIN) , �L;egal descrlption• � :d�� � ; ' � �,. ,� �; ti '„t Lot' Block �..�» � ��; �ract/Addition y�` O''RC�G7 � fs� �(�'l�D�(. ' I � ,,r � yr��, t - � t' s� Legal descriptian.of easement to be vacated. `3 , `''' G��•�, Y��rr�,� hr��n�t� '° r yy� *� I Y� ,t�:� i at ;: r e.,�. J �'!�'�. i & i,; c�, � r�.'�� ��h:'. � ] .!t S 4 � , 4i 1 ,� C�rrent zoning: �- "" 1 Squa�e %otagelacreage ^ - � - :, � � .� � _ � Reason for va.cation: Ct�Gj$'12.i1C�'�'li3'i� d� '1J �`��r'�V'�s� _ . � Have you operated. a business in a city which required a business license? `: �� ' � �� d Yes No If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business`? � �Vas that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNEIt INFORMATION {as it appears on the property title) � -- (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owneas m�st sign tt�is form prior to°processing) : N� '��''1, v�...- �'�tC..�i ���i21���-t�._ � 4�4-C... � ,' Annx�ss �{ � `i� �o I=���`k��tz7tr�- � 04�.:: ,r;: � �;�t r KE : �;����, :., ����� c� { , . � p �r_,. r y� �: � , t � ��� � �r �� _ ' DAYTIlVIE PHONE ��?Z "`'�S �P�' � . � � � , � � � � � ���ax �.� :_r� � SIGNATURE -. �;� J..t�f ,��' �� �4, �� t� � ,,�=�N� DATE - Z."�I �► ��9� �����; � ��. � ,�, � a �„° , � �" �'� �r'�, �� � : 1{ �r4 • { t { �h s � �: y .. - � _ i ". R� ti P'i r � � 1 � �� � a��� � rt rt 7'�. �1 �, �� / � . � � PETITIONER INFORMATION'�� , , ;5��r , � $ ,.� t � � ;�� � �����'��.�',� x ,.� f�� ��rF� � 4� ���� k� �� � 1 ,' � �n'.' :-.i }i : � _ f N i�d '_53 r�f��t K: "'�� a t $?%� -r s ? iP� �ir � da kl,�.,��rl �� Ix � tw� f{ k�� G: ,� �r'ja �- r :�b, x °�� rr +���^• .,a � "�Y "�' _ Yh1 �t 3 � ��� .di � �, P v.�.$i?�t a N� �i h'�PE%�.i%r�. ' � �' ,-� � ,: �, , � , � ��, i d �` UY t � ta� �h � �� �p i' r � `` ���'�t�r � � �� � � t]i.l�L��J� Y��i� �L�JI4���•,�''/���i'• + `1�2�6�f d��� +:N ` �i.. ,;��� xt :{a�r xtsr �it� 1M, � ���'-`$V+ `I�AYTIMEPHONE' ����':r 57� ' � �: ;r� -' SIGNATURE '� �'� K�� ` �� � - ��-DATE � ' Z' �� "`E C� � . v 1� � . �, . ;•:: , . ,. , ..,;: > � _ _ � _ _ � _ �_ . �. _ 5�: .���.. , . . , ; . .. .,. . ... .. ,.41 . ^-' . . ' -ty - '," .. . . . ...r �. . ' ' _ _ "_._. ` ...�... t�. �J : r�, I'�i. �.� �WL�� { 1 �� � 4� i , � Permit SAV # � ,,, �� 1� ; Appl��on,�ceive ,� n , , �; � , z � � �� �°.�x� :_ i i�:. .,. rt i� 1��� f�� �, nph�w �t,; - f �6 .i� t t i: '� , . . . . . , . . � h-y ,. .!� I � .. r��:. �... . ..� :pi;�, j rtr. : SAV #9b-Ol Imperial Homes Inc. for Royal Oaks Realty Imperial Homes Inc. for Royal oaks Realty 4196 Lexington Avenue Shoreview, NIlJ 55126 Duane/Karon Narog or Current Resident 1465 North Danube Rd NE. Fridley, MN 55432 Thaddeus/Gail Jude ar Current Resident 5688 Arthur Street NE Fridiey, MN 55432 Lyle/Patricia Elmberg or Current Resident 58U1 Arthur Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 City Council Members Mailing List Joseph Andert or Current Resident 1445 North Da�ube Rd NE Fridley, MN 55432 Terry/Connie Reyes or Current Resident 1479 North Danube Rd NE Fridley, NIld 55432 Gordon/Linda Backlund or Current Resident 5805 Arthur Street NE Fridley, NIIJ 55432 Donald/Shirlie Moore . or Current Resident 5821 Arthur Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 David Newman Planning Comm. Chair 7635 Alden Way NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mailed: March 1, 1996� � .-� John/Phyllis O'Brien or Current Resident 1453 North Danube Rd NE Fridley, 1rIl�T 55432 Milton/Paulette Bullock or Current Resident 5674 Arthur Street NE Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Jacob/Emma Wiens or Current Resident 5809 Arthur Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 The Diocese of St. Paul 328 Kel�.-ogg Boulevard W St. Paul, MN 55102 �"'� �