The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 09/18/1996 - 7072i"� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINC WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1996 7:30 P. M. PUBLIC COPY (Please return to Community Development Dept.) n � CITY OF FRlDLEY AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1996 7:30 P.M. LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNlNG COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: September 4, 1996 � PUBLIC HEARING• CQNSJDERATION OF A ZO�IING TEXT AMENDMENT ZTA #96- .. � 01. BY NORTHCO CORPORATION• • ' � � � � � �� - �. � To amend the Fridley City Code, Chapter 205, entitled "Zoning':: By amending Section 205.17.C., "Uses Permitted with a Special Use Permit", by adding: . 205.17.C.(5) Commercial Daycares �. and renumbering consecutive sections; and By amending Section 205.18.C., "Uses Permitted with a Special Use Permit", by adding: ' � . 205.1 B. C. (5) Comrriercia) Daycares and renumbering consecutive sections. � RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 12 1996 �alonq with September 9 1996 update�, OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURN � m � F i "'� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 CALL TO ORDER' Chairperson Savage called the September 4, 1996, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Diane Savage, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig, Larry Kuechle Dave iCondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba .• : Others Present: . . Saott. Hickok,�� P�a�nirig •Coor.d'inator _ . . �. , . • � . . �.�PPR4VAL OF`'AUGUS�. 21� :' 199f PE�AI�N�NG COMMISSIOI�F MINUTES�:.�, :• • . . � � � MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the � August 21,.1996, Planning Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICY� VOTE, ALY. VOTIleTG AYE, CHAIRPERSOI�T BAVAGL DECI�ARED THE MOTION CA1tRIED III+Il�iNIMOIIBLY. • 1. (Tabled 8/21/96� PIIBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECI • � � �. . USE pE12MIT �REOUEST, •SP •#9�=14 � BY� •ROGER SERDAHL: • . . � � �er Section 205.0'7.O1.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code; to allow an accessory building other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet, on Lot 3, Block 4, City View, generally located at 409 - 57th Place N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, �econded by Mr. Sielaff, to remove the matter from•the table and to open the public �earing. . IIPON A VOICE VOTL, ALL VOTINC: AYl:, CHAIRPERSON DECLARLD T8E MOTION CARRIED AND THE pIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request was presented at the last meeting. The request is for a special use permit for a second accessory structure. The petitioner has requested the special use permit as well as a variance in order to construct a garage at this location. Mr. Hickok stated the proposal is to supplement the existing 16- foot x 20-foot garage with a new detached garage measuring 12 feet x 22 feet. The existing garage is located 5 feet from the property line on the 57th Avenue side of the property. The petitioner has appeared before the Appeals Commission. Staff had recommended denial of the variance request to 22 feet. Staff is also recommending�denial of the special use permit request. � PLANNING COMMISSION MEBTING SEPTEMBER 4 1996 PAGE 2 Mr. Hickok stated the issue is that the request compounds difficulties in a neighborhood that already has existing detached accessory structures closer to the road than allowed by code, including one existing on this property. Having another garage close to the curb creates a compound of structures. There are also alternatives on the site for consolidation into one garage at a typical setback. There is also an opportunity to attach the garage and provide potential living space above the structure. Options exist on this site that do not require a variance or special use permit, and will not detrimentally impact the neighborhoods' open space. For that reason, staff recommends denial of the request. Staff will work internally to have the remodelling counselor see if there is any remodelling advic� that : . , aa.n be given to .consol idate the d�ell�ing �and �he ga.rage . ' . . _ . �.,�r.: �Hickok st�.tec� the peti�'ian�� :w�as:•�o� •presei�� at: the 7neati,�g. •:. :�. � � Ms. Savage stated the petitioner was present at the Appeals Commission meeting on August 28 and had the opportunity to speak. • The Appeals Commission recommended denial of the request. In_her �opinion, the Planning Commission should act on the request. MOTION by Mr. KueChle, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the . public hearing. �� IIPON A VOICL VOTB� ALL oOTTNG•AYE�� CHAIRPERSON BAPAGE �ECLARED � THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:35 P.M. Ms. Savage stated the petitioner had the opportunity to speak at the Appeals Commission meeting and•had the opportunity again to b.e present at the. Plar►ni�g Commis$ion meeting.. Mr. �Cuechle was present at the Appeals Commission meeting but all members present felt there were alternatives. The site is now crowded. Because of the alternatives to consolidate into one garage, the Appeals Commission unanimously recommended denial of the variance. Mr. Kuechle concurred. The existing garage is 43 years old so it not a particularly valuable structure any more. The biggest expense that the petitioner would incur would be the removal of the old garage. He thought the petitianer knew the procedure and knew to be here. He did not think they needed to be concerned that the petitioner did not understand the process. Ms. Modig stated staff had mentioned one reason the petitioner wanted to keep the existing garage as it is was the cost of removing the asbestos. Staff checked into the regulations to see if the processes were the same for residential and commercial projects. Has the petitioner been made aware of that? �"� �.-� PLANNING COMMI38ION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. PAGE 3 Mr. Hickok stated yes. The petitioner seemed to be seeking alternatives. When asked if he wanted to continue with this process, the petitioner request the City Council act on it. Ms. Modig stated she talked to some of the neighbors. Those that she talked to did not have any problems with the request. Mr. Hickok stated staff received one call from a neighbor who indicated they had a problem with the request as problem as proposed. They would prefer to see a consolidation. Mr. Sielaff asked if the petitioner had any objections ta the alternatives. . � � . • Mr. �.iiickcik • �ta�ed � he. thou�ht- �h�e a��exi�►ativ�s• seemed ta Ya� . • : � . . � . . � . . . something�.the..pe.titi+oner.:�iay.be..wa.-].ling�•to :puzsue.�.• He:.tt�o�}g�it.�....• �� . � . ' �� the pe�itioner� was looking for an �opportuni�.y for iriexpensive �� : � _ � � garage space as�opposed to a more complicated process. He � thought the petitioner saw the merit of consolidsting even though it is more expensive. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconde�i by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend ^ c�nial of Speaial Use Permit Request, #96-02, by Roger Serdahl, . . to allow an accessory.building.other than the first accessor.y � building, : o,ver 240 square � feet; ori Lot �3, Block 4, . City View, ' ' . generally �acated at 409 - 57th'Place N.E. �• ' IIPON lel VOICE VOTL� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City �.`ouncil would consider this r•equest on September 16. � . 2. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT REOUEST, L.S. #96-02, BY KEITH AND DONNA MAAHS• To split the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 into two separate parcels, described as follows: Parcel A: The East 33.25 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to easements, if any. Parcel B: The West 33.25 feet of the East 66.50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to easements, if any. This property is generally located at 1241-43�Norton Avenue N.E. � �, � � PLANNING_COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 4 Mr. Hickok stated this request came to the City for a lot split. The structure is a side-by-side double bungalow at 1241-43 Norton Avenue. There was a sense by staff that historically some of these requests have been approved. Staff wanted to get a sense of what has happened on lot splits in the past. It seemed there should be a policy that lot splits should have components outlined. Lot split requests must meet the following requirements: 1. A minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet prior to the lot split. 2. A minimum lot width of 75 feet prior to the lot split. ��'3. � .••fihe� ��ru�ture� must:;b� •p�a�en•'to �t�e�: al'1�•.minimtim� buiid.ir�g. �. . •. ' , � .. code requixem�nts. :for . u�riit�. separa�ioh,. : •. . . . . . .� ' Mr. Hickok stated many of tYie homes of this vintage were constructed with a common wall similar to a singZe-family residential e�erior wall•and not quite the fire-wall as requiXed by the code. With the th�ee items lacking, staff contacted the petitionexs to'let them know the lot Was substandard and the. structure would need modifications before the request could be considered. Staff �di.d not hear from the petita.oners� since they zeceived:the letter. ••In the f�ture,• appiications �w�li• �not� be accepted wi�hout meeting these mii�imum requirements. '� " Mr. Sielaff asked what the two-hou'r fire wall was. Mr. Hickok sicated.this is basically two finished walls with sheetrock on either side and an air space in between. It allows separation in the ev�nt of a fire in one•of the units and gives approximately two hours time before it seriously aff�cts the adjacent unit. The fire wall goes from the foundation up to the ridge line. Older homes often have open rafters so the flames can carry across and involve the entire structure. Ms. Savage asked if staff's memo reflects something new in the analysis of lot split requests. � Mr. Hickok stated it reflects something new internally. We have had four requests for lot splits recently. In real estate, a unit that has been split can be more marketable. Staff felt it necessary to have a uniform statement for these requests. Ms. Savage asked if this petitioner was led to believe they could apply. Mr. Hickok stated he did not know details of conversations that lead to their making the application. The application was . _ I �.�� . :::1 � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 5 accepted but, during the review process, it was determined the property lacked these components. Ms. Savage asked if there was a need to inform the public of this decision. Mr. Hickok stated the lot area and lot width requirements are already part of the code and the fire wall requirement is part of the building code. Mr. Kuechle stated he did not see it necessary to inform the public. This is nothing new. It just clarifies the _ requirements. � • . `Mr.•�;�i�c�t�o�C�•�s�a�ed��he .Gi�y..-t�as�'a:��anbex: of� dc��a.ble• hungal�o�..�ots• . .. ' � that meet •.th� ��requ.irem�nts. . It. i..s.. nqt. �nusual•. �� .:$�af�'s .�fe�ling..: � ..: • :� , ' , -is -� tHat, in ��the . event ` a uriit should � j�urn or' be �� de�troj�efl, w� t�ien � �' . have two� �owners to deal with on the parcels. If tYie� sites have a minimum 75-foot lot width, we then have the opportunity to join them into one lot. ' Mr. Kuechle asked if this lo� was 8,892 square feet befor� the � lot split. � Mr. Hickok stated yes. .The' iot' wid�� after the �$plit would• be appro�timately 33 feet: � � � � Mr. Sielaff asked if this policy needed to be approved by the City Council and if the City Council had. delegated this to staff.. Mr. Hickok stated he thought the Gouncil would be comforta3�le. wfth staff making'this type of decision. Internally, it boils down to what staff will accept at the counter as a minimum standard. Home owners can still go through the process. The requireme�nts are now a part of the code and the code is very clear. With the 60-day agency action law, he felt the City Council would prefer that staff not accept these types of applications. Ms. Modig asked if there are buildings that would meet these requirements. Mr. Hickok stated yes. Mr. Sielaff stated he was trying to separate what is policy and what is code. Is this something staff is doing to be sure the code is being enforced? ^ Mr. Hickok stated the minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet and the minimum lot width of 75 feet is in the code. The fire wall 0 ,� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 4, i996 PAGE 6 requirement is a safety issue. It is a major reconstruction project and we want to petitioner to be aware of this requirement. The cost of this reconstruction can be prohibitive and staff wants to identify that for the petitioner. Mr. Kuechle stated the two-hour fire wall is a building code requirement. Mr. Hickok stated the policy portion is putting this information together and informing the petitioner at the time they come in to make the application. Ms. Savage stated there is no need.to notify the public because .� this • is �nothing n��a, It: �'is: just enforci;rig . wh�t . is ax�eady. in the . • eod� . � . . . � • . . . . . . . .. . . . � , . . . . . . . . �. Mr. Hickok stated this application could have been moved forward but staff feels this would have been a disservice to the petitioner. Nis. Modig asked if there was a time where buildings were required ' to have th�.s type of constructi�n. . � Mr.. Hickok stated it.wou�d be easy to go.back to tlie Uniform _ � Building ��Code . as to what is required i�etweeri unit. • He •�Ghough't � .. the fire-wall requirement was �hanged in 1976 ox 198�4. � � Ms. Modig stated perhaps it would be helpful to state on the application that any buildings constructed prior to this date must meet these requirements. . Mr. Kuechle stated, when soiaething happens to buildings, they must then be brought up to code. That may be the case here. Mr. Hickok stated that is a consideration. There is cost involved and what value this has in relationship to the rest of the building. Beyond 50% of the value of the structure, it would reguire being built to ali new standards. 3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETI1dG OF JULY 16, 1996 Mr. Sielaff stated these minutes have not been approved by the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission. The next meeting will be in October. MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission � meeting of July 16, 1995. � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 PAGE 7 IIPON A VOICB VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER30N SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF AUGUST 8, 1996 MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive the minutes of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting of August 8, 1996. IIPON A 40ICE VOTB, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRILD IINANIMOIISLY. - . . . . 5. MOTION by Mr. Ruechle, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Appeais Commission meeting of August 14, 1996. IIPON A VOICE YOTla� ALL VOTING.AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION C,ARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. . � 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 2 8, 19'9 6 ' Mr. Kuechle stated•these minutes hav-e not been officially •�' approved. The next meeting is scheduled for September 25. e � MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Appeais Commission meeting of August�28, 1996. ZTPON A VOiCE �10TE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIItPERSON SAVAGE DECI�ARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISL3[. OTHER BUSINES5' Mr. Hickok stated, once the minutes are accepted, he will provide a copy to members if there are any changes. Mr. Hickok stated the first draft of the traffic study done as part of the Home Depot project for the 57th street improvements is back from Home Depot's consultant. The County and the consultants for Home Depot will meet tomorrow. The consultants have outlined a number of options for 57th Avenue. No costs have been assigned. We are working toward a solution. The Commission will be kept informed of the progress. � , b � � PLANNING COMMISBION MEETING 3EPTEMBER 4 1996 PAGE 8 ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE SEPTEMBER 4� 1996� PLANNING COMMISSION MEBTING ADJOIIRNED AT 8:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, '` ` '1 ' " ��(`�7 C!� Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary � 0 �� L� , , DESCRIPTION OF RE�UEST: . The applic:ant. requests that the. Cit�t. amend � the Ind�strial District r�quiremer�ts to a11ow �: daycares as a special use. The applic,�nt would� litCe to �locate �the �Children's Home � Society as a tenant in their building located at 5� - 73rd Avenue. SUMMARY OF ISSUES• The Zoning Code only allowrs daycares in the residerrtial (as a special use) and commercial (permitted) districts. They are currer�tly not allowed in industrial districts. There are several types of daycares to cansider when wrfting regulating standards. The.se include: 1. Star�-alone cerrters for pubiic use. 2. Centers for public use within a multi tenant building. 3. Cerrters for private use within a multi tenant building. The State building and flre c�des have very spe�fic r�uirements regarding occupancY, separation requirements, and adjacent uses. A number of zoning issues should be cons�dered, including floor area, location of outdoor play areas, loading and drop-off locations, pedestrian crossings, and signage. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance change allowing daycares as a special use in both the light and heavy industrial districts. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to draft language for review and approval by the City Council. ,-� Staff Report ZTA #96-01, by Northco Corporation Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. Location of Property: Legal Description . of Prope�ty:. �. . . ' . Size: � .. . . Topography: Existing Vegetation: � Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: .� V�ahicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: Site Planning Issues: i A Zoning Code amendmerrt to allow daycares in the industrial distriets. 500 - 73rd Avenue N. E. Trad B, Registered Land Survey No. 6 Three acres � - . . . . Relatively flat Urban larrclscape M-2, Heavy Industrial Yes 73rd Avenue 73rd Avenue bikeway/walkway 2 � Staff Report ZTA #96-01, by Northco Corporation Page 3 REDUEST The petitioner �u� that the City approve an amendmerrt to the light and heavy industrial districts to allow dayc�re.s. The petitioner owns the building at 500 73rcJ Avenue and desires to have The Children's Home Society to locate there as a tenant. The C'�ty Code currerrtly do� not recognize daycare as a permitted use in the industrial districts. Beyond the requ�t at hand, Ciiy shaff, Planning Commission, and City Cour�il is being asked to consider a zoning text amendr�errt to allow daycares b�y right or special use perm� ir the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts. �PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AI�tD � iiISTORY � � � � - � � � � . . � - The subject par+cel currer�tly under consideration is located east of Universit�r Av�ue on 73rd Avenue. The building at ane time housed the offices for Carter Day. The building was constructed in 1973, witli an addifion in 1978. The build9ng is 36,000 square feet in area. � ANALYSIS When considering an ordinance amendmerrt for this type of use, there are three types of daycare f�cilities which could exist in the industrial districts. These include: 1. Stand-alone, for public use facilities. 2. For public use iacilities located in multi-tenant buildings: 3. For private use faciliti� locateci within a single or multi tenant building. As the City has little vacant industrial land remaining, staff would recommend that the Planning Commission not allow stand alone facil'�ies in order to pr�erve the land for industrial uses. For the remaining facility types, there are a �umber of issues which should be considered: 1. Pro�mity of the outdoor play area to the building; children should not be required to cross traffic areas. i"'� 3 � ,-.� Staff Report ZTA #96-Oi , Page 4 2. 3. ,� � by Northco Corporation Loading and drop-off locations should not interfere with traffic flow. Pedestrian crossing areas shouid be cleariy marked. 4. Limit the maximum floor area to be occupied by such us� (similar to commercial retail us�, which are limited to 30% of the floor area, with no single tenant exceeding 5,000 square feet). Is the ceiling of 5,000 square feet appropriate for this use? 5. .. Require par�dng at 1 space per 100 square feet of 100 square feet of .�. useable• daycare space (per Seetion 20�.0�.01:G.(4):(a) of the.c�de). . C:� 7. � Limit the type of signage to wall signage, no independerrt fre�standing signs shall be pe�mitte.cf. The i�ciliiy shatl be lic�s� in accordance with Minn�ota and Anoka Cour�ty r�uirements. The facility shall comply with buifding c�de occupancy and sep�ration requiremerrts. With the above requirements, daycares can be a compatible use in the industrial districts. They afso provide a needed service for employees in these districts. RECOMMENDATION Staff re�ommends that the Plannir�g Commission recommend approval of the ordinance cf�nge to allow daycares in industrial districts. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to draft language regarding the above stipulations for review and approval by the City Council. ADJACENT SITES WEST: SOUTH: M-2, Heavy Industriai M-2, Heavy Industria! 4 lndustrial Equities Office Complex Northco Industrial Center ^ Staff Report ZTA #96-01, by Northco Corporation Page 5 EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: �'1 �"1 M 2, Heavy Industrial R-1, Single Family Consistent To be taken 5 Target Warehouse 73rd Avenue & Melody Manor � � NORTHCO BUSINF�S PARK . FRIDLEIf, MN � � � �J �� ___J �J �� o - . 7J RD AVE NE � _ - - - � _ _ _ _ _ _ � I- _ _ _ _ � � � 3]ACRFS 1 J� � � `��,f` �°� / ' - � 2 • 1 �.. � I � � Y AVE. N.E. � I I I ....:: .•-�- i � I I � ;:;;500-:•::•:• � - SOLD � _ _ - J i � / . I � � ' � - -� . ��i��i�� i '� ¢�(� ° HNH►HIIHHIIfNfHHI�A i ao ac�s i ,� i- -. _/ i� 6 a� I u��ww }! 7 � 8 � � � / z.o ncaES � � � � � ' � ---- �---� � ,� 3 i i� z.es ncaES � , � � � � z.z acaES � l 5 i i i � L _ _ J � �� — — — � � �`:=:;:' , - - - - ' � - - - :�:�504:C<•i:%•i: � I � 2.0 ACRES � 2.0 ACRES' I I I I � ig i � � sot.o i 4 � �� ' I I I� 4.OACRES F-------------J �_ -�- -_ - I _ ___ —__- �; � -'✓E N I /�- NO.ZTy PLOT PLAN m, �, � 1 �C) THC� I201 MARQUETTE AVE. SO. SUITE i YO MINNEAPOI,IS, MN 55�03 SCALE L�;- :fffi':r.�:.:..�%Y.' . �,. „ � . _ ■ Office space available . for lease in an existing 36,000 sq. ft. single � story of�ice building. ` ■ Spaces from 1,000 to I5,000 sq. ft. available ■ Ampleparking with easy ingress and egress to building ■ Extremely competitive lease rates! ■ ForFurther Information Contnct: Stephen Brown Mike Fleetham 332-2212 ..t� : � '�">= ` f:� _ � �� 9� `� �'�r� � l.�' {.ui _5.`_ ._, _wc '� .� ! C� c !:- 4 �1 y . -�..�.: f .4, Y'�t _Y,......i.�;-'. ra�r..... . �...Y_......... �` i� i�' rr 't j: •.x � �� :�� E —+�-Pf � _ �i� .. , `�S%s'T'Tk C �'S4�'7 � � �� X��' � : � S�m_ � K i��"w. ��' ,,,�""� ;� } �a �r>' _: ; �- ,a �"�`�'" � ''�=�� .. �� '� ��A n�� r . � �...�= =�'�� :� `� :y : �� ,. �y� � - � .. t�- 'E 3 = � `�'+>` a' • � � w.�� .:.. i '� �: 7 D , _ !`° ` , h i 'yS�` � § � . e, ; ,� i L � 3 � " �� ' � �r-�` � yA�"�; r'4 R�` P' , � R� °� s� �� f F y,"' 1, f � a� ±y �� . �� '�� k}�^`� vs �,` _ S � ,: � ,� �.. � 1_ >_� �W� � ��'.�`�`; e � � �_"•�.�``*-.ar�,. ,K_-iYa-�`��`+'?��.`�wY_��-"'3'-"�_r�,'„ ��"s�i x , z�� •-a,�-r,— an�y�, c .�+4?�:'��"-'v��°�'�`1 = .,.�#�'.aw"eq'^"r' F:a. � �:. .,... . . . . .. . . �.��--, -;: -�-- = - ._.. .. __ .-�_.,-�-"�-�-' ,�--.• �.� � ��°"z �'��UHNERSITY fiVE�UE �,,,=� _x �t _..e...s>,T.. �...-.,�wa�s�b;�.�..,a.�— _ _ _ _,��- . _ _ '��nf�_, r .. r 'T .; � � � . .. n ,, , . ... .. ,�.: , ,.-f .: a. m � .- - . � �zxc�xx.l..� � �� __.` ,. . �.. . . _t ; .�..��.71ST AVENUE _....._'�. .: � , :"� 9 9�. ., e .. - 4 l.r ��/},�4 y`'r, i� -p h , .. �k . ��,.y. a �� ,{ � - �...�, i �. � r1 �' � t�' "'-�c`r '�-' �. .. S �� 'ti:. .--•sw,�a- � ,i � y �� I 1 j� r��i �� , .fs � ` '�Gmi �� r 1 . �.G � � a ��. �.< .! w.. _� 4� � ' 7 "' " r�' - + . E c ' . k f-- . 4 �. � �t . <�-- d i' � 4� li .� s< ..�'A :'y. i. .. �}. -i5, at �,73RD AVENUE " y _:� ,� • . r� f.,r'aaui:f i;,, Fr , ��-� 9 � � �� , ' '�� .ti�'. .� a S. ,� ,z � , . �, � 'r _` 1 s 3- � e a �l r �, V, c r �r+�'.�� ft;1s;,, s ,.,� ' t . / . '.t , � 9, r . .: � . . � h ,'_ x r, `:'' + .n �. , '"� � �- -. . Y,. � ::. Q , w ; ��.^ t- ."` r.. _.. ., a . .. �. . -' .. . .r?�. �', . � �:` N �p� � � FACT S H E ET .� . ,� Children°s Home Society OF MINNESOTA 4 "i;. •.i,:� .+.' 'f T� �' Served 22,560 children and their famiiies in 1995. Founded in 1889 as part of a nationwide movement to get orphaned children out of institutions and into loving families. Statewide, nonsectarian, nonprofit child and family social service agency. Active volunteer board of directors with 48 members. A staff of 447 along with 1,841 volunteers help carry out the agency's mission. , : Programs incl�de: . . . • . . . . • � • Child Care Services ...... Sixteen centers throughout Minnesota ...... School-Age Day Shelter • Child Abuse Prevention Services ...... Six crisis nursery sites serving Anoka, Chisago/Isanti, Dakota, Ramsey and Washington counties ...... Family Mentor Programs ...... Parent Education and Support • Adoption Services ...... Open Adoption/Pregnancy Counseling ...... International Adoption • ...... American Infant Adoption ...... Special Needs Adoption ...... Post Adoprion Services Licensed by the Minnesota. Department of Human Services and approved by the National Council of Accreditation of Services for Families and Children. Accredited member: Child Welfare League of America. Member: Minnesota Association for the Education of Young Children. Exceeds standards set by the Minnesota Charities Review Council. Participating member of 265 United Way fund drives in Minnesota. Acknowledged by Eleven Who Care, KARE 1 l, as the 1994 Agency of Excellence. Received the 1994 Child Welfare League of America Outstanding Management Award for the Midwest Region. — more — Leadership and excellence in child care, adoption and child abuse prevention. Administration 1605 Eustis St. Saint Paul MN 55108 612/646-7771 Fax 612/ 646-8676 '� Children's Home Society of Mi��zesota: • Provides a continuum of services for those considered at risk — abused and neglected children, teenage parents and their children, and adolescents in conflict with their parents and society around them. • Serves as the largest nonprofit provider of child care services in the state: 2,533 children attended one of our 16 child care centers and 84 children attended the school-age day shelter in 1995. • Offers a variety of unique child care programs — including corporate on-site care for the children of working parents, teen mothers finishing high school and single moth�rs getting an education, as well as a day shelter for children at risk. All of these innovative centers emphasize child-parent involvement to provide parents with professional child care services that buiid family ties. • Offers the largest, most comprehensive adoprion program in the country for children from Minnesota, the U.S., Korea, Eastern Europe, Vietnam, India, Greece, China and Latin America. Last year, 452 children found families through Children's Home Society of Minnesota. ^ • Created the first post adopfion deparlment in the United States, with counseiing services for adoptive families, birthpazents and adopted persons. � • Coordinates "Thursda.y's Child," a weekly television segment on KSTP, to recruit families for Minnesata children with special needs. • Provides counseling for birthpazents within the African-American Adoption Project. In 1995, 10 African-American and bi-racial children were placed in adoptive fami;ies. • Operates a home-based, 24-hour crisis nursery program in Minnesota. In 1995, Children's Home Crisis Nurseries celebrated 10 years of service. Our crisis nurseries protected 1,835 children from abuse and neglect in 1995. • Established the first life planning/therapy counseling program for older children in foster care, in cooperation with county agencies and the courts. Our Mission: Children's Home Society of Minnesota is committed to helping children t�hrive; to building and sustaining safe, loving families; and to providing opportunities for ind'ivid'ual growth. a '"�1 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Aednesday, September 18, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #96-01, by Northco Corporation, to amend the Fridley City Code, Chapter 205, �ntitled "Zoning": By amending Section 205.17.C., "Uses Permitied •wit$i a Sp�cial Use . - . Permit'!, �by adding: . � • . �: . - 205.17.C. (5) Comntercial Daycares and renumbering consecutive sections; and � By amending Section 205.18.C., "Uses Permitted with a Special Use Permit", by adding: 205.18.C. (5) Co�nmercial Daycares and renumbering consecutive sections. Any and all persons desYring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Community Development Department at 572-3593. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than September 11, 1996. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION � Publish: August 8, 1996 August 15, 1996 � CITY OF FRIDLEY �� 6431 ITNIVERSTTY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 '� (612) 571-3450 � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT Requested Change Section of Fridley Code to be changed .(Attach additional documents if necessary) M-1 and M-2 �,; . , ,,, . Request I,angua;e. (AttaEh additional documents if necessary�) - , � Al1ow day care as a permitted�or accessory use in the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts. . _ - _ ,. $ , _. . . . : , , ,; {,.. . ... .: .. : ,. : ; " . - - - - -- . j � <, � � , . Y" � /�! 'i - , �:. : f . l 3 - � y.,J J �5'� 4 K% r T��_ (`� _ y•iL• - `'��, iS.�� ,... Li �iC ,� ��".. ��" � �.�Y -�� Y �� . Y .�� .' Yf-L'.: Reason for` re`quested change' (Attach additionai ;documents if necessary) �;,., � .. , . : :,_ , ., .: � ,, , . . �. .. : , . _ .�, ,,; ,,;:. rox�mity , to� day eare�4#or.,,employe�s�is-ax•a' valiiable s�ervace =i:�� toclay�'s :� ' �; � �,� �'1 �"s'�$ ��,�Y �� -�f i�` $"r P �` ..;z ��.�}��`�kz�.r ."�r� lz� s€Fa�.�ri�3p� „a"r+vk{.`n�'g��';',�.."-� '�c -�r't"S',r....it��''7 T:'�,:�`�e�`a �.�o�Y �i F� r,^a�.aa.z{rz��^�y�t 5 ��iu-��.- � � " � � � ''j-:..�d` r:.`Li� ..� .�, s;r � � {u. �, � � a �S f'�Y1-;� , o�S.:', ' �: nt rx lal3o��zta'r•ke�°wlier'e trequently;alioth.';�iarents;'`or��a?wsiiigle=`parent,=�;works`°�{ - ' �< `,..;,,,,� ,� �;, 1 t� f _ '" outside the home: �:�. - . _ ��` .sr'.�.... --..._: E�t .:� .. .' :"f:'^ ,�tt. �i.`.. ...��." . _�,'f!7t 9/% �.r.� - .. � . . .... � y - ��f r s*H fi. R'k r /s' ' . . :f.; .. .P. Yk.R,:�' � _ �., ��,� �. �. � ... �h . . "'.fi-r �.�s � �:�, :,�., -. r.. � _ _;� . , , . . _ ' .' -.� : . �. Qk{ . F PETITIONER INFORIVIATION� �} . , , ;_ . .. . ,. ; . . . . - .. . .. . . ... . ...�; 9 . - . . � . NAME Northco Corpoxa�i�n ADDRESSr�4�900 Viking Drive, Edina, MN 55435 SIGNATURE Fee: $300.00 ZTA # cj' (� - rj � Receipt # Application received by: Scheduled Planning Commission date: _ Scheduled City Council date: 3� �o DAYTIlVIE PHONE 82o-16so DATE 8/lb/96 w � ZTA #96-01 Mailing List Mailed: 8/30/96 Northco ,� r thco Corporation Dennis Zylla 4900 Viking Drive Edina, MN 55435 Willamette Industries 1300 - 5th Avenue SW Portland, OR 97201 I,arsen-Doran Part. or Current Resident 7201 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 FCA Ltd. 7970 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 Diane Savage, Chai� Pj'�'�ning Commission 5� Rice Creek Terre NE F°ridley, MN 55432 �, Industrial Equities John Allen 1660 So Hwy 100, #536W St. Louis Pk, MN 55416 Willamette Industries or Current Resident 350 Northco Drive NE Fridley, MN 55432 Tri-State Land Co. 1601 Soo Line Building Minneapolis, NIld 55440 Current Resident 7151 Commerce Cir. NE Fridley, NIl�T 55432 City Council Members Fridley Business Cen�er c/o Northco Corp. 1201 Marquette Ave. #11 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Larsen-Doran Part. 2252 Lenwood Court SW Rochester, MN 55902 Current Resident 7200 University Ave. NE Fridley, HIlJ 55432 Fridley Business Plaza 3300 Edinborough Way#20 Edina� MN 55435