Loading...
PL 04/21/2010 - 29953PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Apri121, 2010 Chairperson Kondrick called the Planning Commission Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT: Leroy Oquist, David Kondrick, Dean Saba, Jack Velin, and Brad Sielaff Brad Dunham and Marcy Sibel Stacy Stromberg, Planner A1 Hunter, WESCO Distribution Ron Rasmussen, WESCO Distribution Jim Faulkner, Faulkner Construction Bruce Clark, for the Assisted Living Facility Jon Bauer, for the Assisted Living Facility Mike Praff, 1341 64t'' Avenue, Fridley Laurel Tracy, 6701 Channel Road, Fridley Approval of Minutes: March 17, 2010 MOTION by Commissioner Sielaff to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Commissioner Velin. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #10-07, by Wesco Distribution, to allow limited outdoor storage on the property, generally located at 515 Industrial Boulevard NE. MOTION by Commissioner Oquist to open the public hearing. Seconded by Commissioner Velin. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:02 P.M. Stacy Stromberg, Planner, stated the petitioner, Joe Zagorski, of WESCO Distribution, is seeking a special use permit to allow limited outdoor storage for the electrical supply business, which is located at 5151 Industrial Boulevard NE. The petitioner is requesting to store PVC conduit, metal guide wire, and outdoor pad transformers in a 73-foot by 98-foot enclosed storage area in the rear yard of the property. Ms. Stromberg stated the property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial as are all the surrounding properties. It is located on the corner of Industrial Blvd. and 52"d Way in the Great Northern Industrial District south of Interstate 694. The property was developed in 1989, with a 17,000 square foot office warehouse building. Ms. Stromberg stated City Code allows limited outdoor storage in the industrial districts that is up to 50 percent of the building footprint with a special use permit. The building's square footage is 17,081 square feet, so City code would allow up to 8,540 square feet of outdoor storage on this site. The petitioner is planning to pave a 73 foot by 98 foot (7,154) area on the east side of the existing building, which will be the confines of the outdoor storage area. The outdoor storage area will be enclosed with an 8-foot chain link fence with vinyl privacy slats and 3 strands of barbed wire, which is allowed in this zoning district. Along with the screening fence, the petitioner also plans to install six new pine trees, to help provide better screening. The storage area will be used for storage of PVC conduit, metal guide wire, outdoor pad transformers, and other materials used for the electrical supply business. This 7,154 square foot outdoor storage area is 83 percent of the allowable outdoor storage space allowed for this property. Ms. Stromberg stated City code requires that the business have 19 parking stalls based on the breakdown of uses within the building. The site plan submitted by the petitioner shows 44 parking stalls. Therefore, the property is in compliance with meeting the parking requirements. Ms. Stromberg stated the removal of green space to construct the outdoor storage area will require the petitioner to obtain a land alternation permit and meet any storm water requirements set forth by the City engineering department. The petitioner is aware of this requirement. Ms. Stromberg stated the proposed site plan meets all other code requirements for limited outdoor storage. City staff has not heard from any neighboring property owners. Ms. Stromberg stated City staff recommends approval of this special use permit, with stipulations. Limited outdoor storage is a permitted special use in the M-2, Heavy Industrial zoning district, provided specific code requirements are met, subject to stipulations. Ms. Stromberg stated staff recommends that if the special use permit is granted, the following stipulations be attached: 1. No outdoor storage other than the proposed enclosed area shall exist on the site without an additional special use permit being approved. 2. The petitioner shall submit storm water drainage/ponding plans to the City's engineering department for review and approval with land alteration permit. 3. Installation of new pine trees shall be completed by October 31, 2010. 4. The types of materials stored outside shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. 5. Per Section 205.OS.S.G, this Special Use Permit will become null and void one year after the City Council approval date if work has not commenced or if the Petitioner has not petitioned the City Council for an extension. Commissioner Sielaff asked whether there were restrictions as to what can be stored outside? Ms. Stromberg replied, yes, there are. The City code doesn't allow, i.e. semi-trailers to be stored outside in this zoning district. The code also requires that Fire Marshall approve materials stored outside because he does not want anything to become combustible when it's in close proximity to the building. Commissioner Velin asked whether it is necessary for the petitioner to put the trees in, or is that an option he decided to do? Ms. Stromberg replied, the City Code does require a combination of fencing and landscaping be used to screen the outdoor storage area. The petitioner proposed to install the trees without the City even asking them to do so. Chairperson Kondrick asked the petitioner whether they have any problem with the stipulations? Ron Rasmussen, Wesco Distribution, replied, no. MOTION by Commissioner Saba to close the public hearing. Seconded by Commissioner Velin. 2 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 7:08 P.M. Chairperson Kondrick stated he has no problem with this. Commissioner Saba stated he did not either. MOTION by Commissioner Sielaff approving Special Use Permit, SP # 10-07, by Wesco Distribution, to allow limited outdoor storage on the property, generally located at 515 Industrial Boulevard NE with the following stipulations: 1. No outdoor storage other than the proposed enclosed area shall exist on the site without an additional special use permit being approved. 2. The petitioner shall submit storm water drainage/ponding plans to the City's engineering department for review and approval with land alteration permit. 3. Installation of new pine trees shall be completed by October 31, 2010. 4. The types of materials stored outside shall be reviewed by the Fire Marshal. 5. Per Section 205.OS.S.G, this Special Use Permit will become null and void one year after the City Council approval date if work has not commenced or if the Petitioner has not petitioned the City Council for an extension. Seconded by Commissioner Velin. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of a Master Plan Amendment, MP #10-01, by Jim Faulkner, Faulkner Construction, Inc., to allow the construction of an assisted living facility on 2 vacant lots, generally located at 6352 Central Avenue and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE. Ms. Stromberg stated Jim Faulkner of Faulkner Construction, Inc. is requesting a master plan amendment for the properties located at 6352 Central Avenue and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive, which are currently owned by the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The Planning Commission and City Council will recall in 2004, Town Center Development was granted a rezoning for the west side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and E. Moore Lake Drive to S-2, Redevelopment District. The purpose of rezoning the entire block was to avoid spot zoning and to achieve one of the goals of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan, which was to consider redevelopment opportunities of the properties on Central Avenue between Rice Creek Road and Mississippi Street. Ms. Stromberg stated when any property is rezoned to S-2 Redevelopment District, it requires that the accompanying site plan become the master plan for the site. Once the rezoning is approved by the City Council, any modification to that originally approved master plan would require a Master Plan Amendment. These properties were not part of the site plan that was originally approved with the 2004 rezoning, because that site plan was specifically for the Sandee's and Tamarisk redevelopment project; however, because the subject properties are zoned S-2, Redevelopment District, any changes to the property requires review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Ms. Stromberg stated the Housing and Redevelopment Authority will hold a public hearing to authorize the sale of the land to the petitioner on May 6, 2010. At this time, they will also further review the petitioner's site plan. Ms. Stromberg stated the HRA purchased these properties in the spring of 2000 as part of one of the goals set out in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan, which was to help spur development along Old Central Avenue. Both properties in their current condition are not buildable due to poor soil conditions. As part of the petitioner's plan to develop the properties, extensive soil corrections will need to be completed. As stated above the HRA will hold a public hearing on May 6, 2010, to consider selling the land to the petitioner. Ms. Stromberg stated Jim Faulkner, with Faulkner Construction, is proposing to redevelop the properties at 6352 Central Avenue and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive with a two-phase project. Phase I of the project will include the construction of a 25,584 square foot building, and will house a forty-unit assisted living and memory care facility, located on the property along Central Avenue. Eighteen seniors will reside in the assisted living wing and twenty-two seniors will reside in the memory care wing. Each wing will have dining and leisure time space as well as support services, such as office space, common toilet rooms with showers, personal care and laundry. Ms. Stromberg stated Phase II will be located on the East Moore Lake Drive property and will be connected to the Phase I building though a breezeway. It is a 10,126 square foot building, which will include 19 additional memory care resident rooms and support services. Dining for the residents will be within this building and the food will be prepared in the Phase I kitchen. Construction of the Phase II project will depend upon the occupancy level of the Phase I building. Ms. Stromberg stated the size of the units within Phase I will range from 299 square feet to 452 square feet, Phase II will consist of 299 square foot units only. Ms. Stromberg stated the buildings will each be one story with pitched roofs, composite lap siding and stone veneer. Phase I will include 21 surface parking stalls and Phase II will include 10 parking stalls. The petitioner has recently submitted the grading and drainage plans for both sites, to determine the best solution to manage the storm water on the site. Landscape plans have been provided for the subject properties and will include a variety of tree species, as well as shrubs and perennial plantings. Ms. Stromberg stated a property that is zoned S-2, Redevelopment District allows for some degree of flexibility when designing a redevelopment project. The petitioner has designed their project to comply with code requirements. Ms. Stromberg stated the proposed Phase I project area is 66,019 square feet (1.5 acres) in size. The 25,584 square foot building will take up 39 percent of the lot. The proposed Phase II project area is 37,245 square feet (.86 acres) in size. The 10,126 square foot building will take up 27 percent of the lot. R-3 zoning standards allows up to 20 percent of lot coverage for main buildings and not more than 30 percent by main building and accessory buildings. G1 zoning standards allow 40 percent lot coverage for one-story buildings. Since the two buildings will be connected to one another, staff will require that the two lots be combined prior to building permit approval. Once the lots have been combined, total lot coverage for the entire project will be 34 percent. Because an S-2 zoning allows some flexibility for redevelopment projects, staff is comfortable with the lot coverage's proposed by the petitioner, provided they can still properly manage their storm water runoff on-site. Ms. Stromberg stated national and regional developments trends for assisted living and memory care appear to point to a lesser lot size requirement. Though well-maintained landscaped grounds are essential to project appeal and resident enjoyment, the size of the lot in this situation can be smaller because 0 the opportunity for residents to participate in larger scale outdoor activities on the grounds is much smaller. Also, less land is required because of the fact that the residents typically do not have cars, nor do they drive. Therefore, there is a lower standard for the number of parking stalls required and less land area to accommodate that automobile use. Ms. Stromberg stated City Code would require 20 parking stalls for Phase I and 10 parking stalls for Phase II, based on parking ratios used for assisted living facilities and nursing homes. The petitioner is providing 21 parking stalls on Phase I and 10 stall on Phase II, therefore; meeting code requirements. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner is requesting a Master Plan Amendment because the property is zoned S-2, Redevelopment district. When the property was rezoned in 2004, a master plan was approved for the Sandee's and Tamarisk site. That master site plan was not related to the subject properties, but because the properties are zoned S-2, Redevelopment district; the City code requires that any development on the properties become a Master Plan though the site plan submitted. Therefore, the petitioner is seeking the master plan amendment. Ms. Stromberg stated if the Master Plan Amendment being discussed in this report is approved by the City Council, it should be noted that any major modification of the site plan would again be required to go back to the City Council for review and approval. Ms. Stromberg stated the City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The subject properties are identified in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to be within one of the "potential redevelopment areas." Those redevelopment areas were developed based upon community input at neighborhood planning meetings and staff recommendations. Redevelopment is a form of community revitalization that transforms undesirable elements of a site into desirable elements that reflect the community's collective plan. Ms. Stromberg stated the proposed assisted living/memory care senior project meets several of the objectives that the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update. One of the goals identified through those meetings and the telephone survey was to "Maintain Fridley as a desirable place to live." Ways to accomplish that goal are to provide more housing diversity and to make Fridley a place where the aged can stay. Only about 8 percent of Fridley's housing is of the town home or condominium structure type, yet 23 percent of Fridley's residents were over age 55 in 2000, and that percentage is growing. To accommodate Fridley's senior citizens desires to live in maintenance-free housing (no yards/house exterior care), more types of senior housing needs to be constructed. The Comprehensive Plan identifies that the types of senior housing to consider are one-level town homes, independent living, assisted living, nursing home/memory care facilities. Ms. Stromberg stated the subject properties are within the "Moore Lake Area" redevelopment area that is generally located along Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive and Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road. The Economic and Redevelopment Plan chapter in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, states that the City should continue to pursue high density senior housing in this area due to the demand for this type of housing in Fridley. Though the proposed use is not "high-density senior housing," it is a type of senior housing that the City is in need of. Ms. Stromberg stated the purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under-utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to meet current market demands and desires of the community, creates new tax base, and creates additional job opportunities. Developing these two parcels with an assisted living/memory care facility will not only meet current market demands, it will create additional jobs, generate new tax base and spur vitality on these otherwise vacant under-utilized parcels. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner had a market study done and it indicates a substantial need within the community for this type of housing. As a result, the petitioner is coming to the City with the proposed proj ect. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner has articulated to staff that there are very few residents within the assisted living facility that have vehicles and residents within the memory care wing, don't drive. Staff learned last year based on a study that was provided by Select Senior Living, that according to the ITE manual, studies have shown that less than 5 percent of residents in an assisted living facility own vehicles, and if they do, they are rarely driven. Employees, visitors, and delivery trucks make up most of the trips to this facility. The ITE manual also points out that the "peak hour" generator typically doesn't coincide with the "peak hour" of the adjacent street traffic for an assisted living facility. This is primarily related to the shifts of the employees beginning at 7:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m., and 11:00 p.m. The typical peak hours on most roadways are between 6:00-7:00 a.m. and 3:00-4:00 p.m. The proposed Phase I and II project will include 59 total units, which should overall generate very little traffic. Ms. Stromberg stated with any development, the City requires that the petitioner submit a code compliant landscape plan. The petitioner has submitted that plan, which shows the installation of 40 new trees on the Central Avenue lot and 21 new trees on the East Moore Lake Drive lot. In addition to the trees, shrubs and perennial plants are planned to be installed on both properties. With that said, it should be pointed out that all of the existing trees will be removed from the site. Due to the organic soils on the site, it is estimated that 13 feet of soils will need to be removed from both sites and new clean soils will need to be hauled in. This is at a cost of no less than $500,000. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner has recently submitted their grading and drainage plans to the City's engineering department for review. It is staffs understanding that the plans have been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District for their review as well. Ms. Stromberg stated before building permits can be issued, the petitioner will need to comply with all requirements set forth by the City's engineering department as well as the Rice Creek Watershed. Ms. Stromberg stated City Staff recommends approval of Master Plan Amendment, MP # 10-01 with stipulations as it: Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. Provides additional job opportunities. Proposed use meets the goals highlighted in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Stromberg stated staff recommends that if the Master Plan Amendment is approved, the following stipulations be attached: 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with the architectural site plan A1 dated , 2010. 2. The building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A3.1, A3.2, titled Exterior Elevations, dated , 2010. 3. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. The petitioner shall meet all Building code, Fire code, and ADA requirements. 5. The petitioner shall ensure that the proposed monument sign is 10 ft. from the property line and driveway, meets vision safety regulations and shall obtain all necessary permits for signage erected on site. 6. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. � 7. The petitioner shall preserve or relocate newly landscaped planter bed on the 1271 East Moore Lake Drive parcel. 8. The petitioner shall comply with any requirements set forth by the Anoka County Highway Department. 9. The petitioner shall receive Rice Creek Watershed District approvals prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. City engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 11. Storm water management maintenance agreement shall be filed with the City prior to issuance of building permits. 12. The petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permits. 13. Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 14. The petitioner shall combine the parcels at 6352 Central Avenue and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive for tax purposes and to allow the proposed development to occur over both lots. 15. If the proposed development is modified to be used for units other than assisted living and memory care units, a master plan amendment will need to be obtained. 16. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to the May 10, 2010, City Council meeting. Chairperson Oquist asked, regarding Phase II, it that actually behind Ziebart or on the west side of Ziebart? Ms. Stromberg replied, yes, it is on the west side of the Ziebart property. Chairperson Kondrick asked whether the breezeway connecting Phase I and Phase I is a covered breezeway or it just a walkway? Ms. Stromberg replied, it is an enclosed covered breezeway. Commissioner Sielaff stated they are going to have to excavate 13 feet of soil from both sites. It will probably be a lot more than $500,000. Have they costed it out? Ms. Stromberg replied, she thinks there have been studies done and those are their preliminary numbers, but the petitioner would be able to answer that question. Commissioner Sielaff asked what does the storm water management maintenance agreement consist of? Ms. Stromberg replied our City Engineer requests this stipulation, but she believes it has something to do with making sure the pond is maintained over time. Sometimes it needs to be trenched out, cleaned out, and we need to have that kind of information filed here at City Hall. Commissioner Sielaff asked whether they will have storm water pond on the site? Ms. Stromberg replied, they may or may not. Depending on how they choose to manage their storm water. Commissioner Sielaff asked whether it could be something where the storm water runoff would run off the site? 7 Ms. Stromberg replied, no, it needs to be managed on the site. Commissioner Sielaff asked if there is a certain size that is necessary? Ms. Stromberg replied, yes, there is, it depends on how much hard surface is on site. Jim Faulkner, Faulkner Construction, stated to clarify regarding the storm water, their engineers are waiting for feedback from Rice Creek. There will have a combination of subterranean drainage, some on- site rain gardens, and a pond. It will meet all standards. Also, the link from Phase I to Phase II is fully heated with windows. Chairperson Kondrick replied whether they had any problems with the stipulations? Mr. Faulkner replied, no, they have no problems with the stipulations. This is the seventh assisted living development for them and they have been wanting to come to Fridley for a long time. Chairperson Kondrick stated the City has had similar projects come to them and for one reason or another, the economy, etc. did not go through. He was curious whether the petitioner's dollars are there for them to complete at least the first phase? Mr. Faulkner replied that is a very valid and a very good question. Having had the experience of developing and building 7 facilities so far and ownership of 5 of the 7, not only through this type of multi- unit design and construction, having the ownership and operation of the same building type, they have learned a lot going through the process and there is county assistance available for a lot of the residents. Their market study showed a current need in 2009 for about 65 residents and in 2013 over 90 residents. He looked at the other applications in the area, and it appears to him there were two things he thinks that caused them difficulty. No. 1 they were pretty large facilities and, No. 2, the trouble was the location. They found that these facilities on busy streets tend to do better. Chairperson Kondrick asked when would they want to start shoveling? Mr. Faulkner replied, they are hoping the last week of May. Commissioner Velin asked the petitioner whether they will be running it? Mr. Faulkner replied, they will build it and they have a management company to run it. Commissioner Oquist asked whether he understood him correctly they have 7 others? Mr. Faulkner replied, yes, they have constructed seven of these types of developments, he has part ownership in five, and recently sold four to concentrate on one facility. They sold their interest to a partnership group. He built his first facility in Hugo. They also have ones in White Bear, North Branch, Maplewood, Hinckley, and Blaine. Commissioner Oquist asked if the one in Blaine is on Highway 65, is the one-story facility? Mr. Faulkner replied, yes. Commissioner Sielaff asked whether the City has heard from any neighbors? Ms. Stromberg replied, they have not received any comments from any neighbors. MOTION by Commissioner Saba to close the public hearing. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 7:34 P.M. Chairperson Kondrick stated he has no problem with this and the City and petitioner have done a great job. The City needs this. Chairperson Oquist stated he has no problem with this. Chairperson Velin stated he is okay with it. Chairperson Oquist asked whether the northern boundary abuts the old Sandee's lot? Ms. Stromberg replied, no, there is another parcel in between (Advanced Companies). MOTION by Commissioner Saba approving the Master Plan Amendment, MP #10-01, by Jim Faulkner, Faulkner Construction, Inc., to allow the construction of an assisted living facility on 2 vacant lots, generally located at 6352 Central Avenue and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive NE with the following stipulations : 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with the architectural site plan A1 dated , 2010. 2. The building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A3.1, A3.2, titled Exterior Elevations, dated , 2010. 3. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. The petitioner shall meet all Building code, Fire code, and ADA requirements. 5. The petitioner shall ensure that the proposed monument sign is 10 ft. from the property line and driveway, meets vision safety regulations and shall obtain all necessary permits for signage erected on site. 6. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 7. The petitioner shall preserve or relocate newly landscaped planter bed on the 1271 East Moore Lake Drive parcel. 8. The petitioner shall comply with any requirements set forth by the Anoka County Highway Department. a. The petitioner shall receive Rice Creek Watershed District approvals prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. City engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 11. Storm water management maintenance agreement shall be filed with the City prior to issuance of building permits. 12. The petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permits. 13. Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 14. The petitioner shall combine the parcels at 6352 Central Avenue and 1271 East Moore Lake Drive for tax purposes and to allow the proposed development to occur over both lots. 15. If the proposed development is modified to be used for units other than assisted living and memory care units, a master plan amendment will need to be obtained. � 16. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to the May 10, 2010, City Council meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Velin. 3. Receive the Minutes of the March 9, 2010, Environmental Quality and Energy Commission Meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Velin to receive the Minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. Receive the Minutes of the March 1, 2010, Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Oquist to receive the Minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Saba. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. Receive the Minutes of the February 4, 2010, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commission Meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Saba to receive the minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OTHER BUSINESS: Ms. Stromberg stated the ne�t meeting is May 19, 2010. ADJOURN MOTION by Commissioner Saba adjourning the meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Sielaff. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:38 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Denise M. Johnson Recording Secretary 10