10/18/1965 - 5939REGULAR COUNCIL IMTING AGMWA - OCTOB$R 18, 1965
•, A NFIEM
Regular M+ssting, October 4, 1965. Pages 1 - 28
EUB?.�C IWAARINGSt
1. Issoning - C-2 -8 & WI to R -3A - Carlson - Lavine Pages 29 & 30.
2. Final Plat - sylvan Hills Plat 8 Page 31
01� Bit
3.
Udversi Avea K.U.
Building Permit 600!!6005 t7 ue
Mascbiafava. (Tabled 10/4/65).
4.
8st#mete - Smiley & Associates (Tabled 9120/65,
!0/4165).
S.
ftplemental Maintenance Agreement - Fridley -
Columbia Heights ('fabled 10/4165) - 90#12.
6.
Supplemental Escrow Agreement - Fridley - Columbia
Haigbts - 88#12 ('Fabled 10/4/65).
7.
Resolution Authorising Agraement with Columbia
Heights - 88012 (Tabled 1014165). Page 32
S.
Proposed Amendment to Chapter 56 - Signs (Tabled
8/16/65, 9/20/65, 10/4/65). Page 33 - 42
9.
Second Reading of Chapter 24 -
Parks mad 8ecreati on. Pages 43 - 45
:
W HBlMt
lo. Bids - Opened Noon October 11, 1965 - W -75C Pages 46 & 47
it. Bids - Opened Noon October 11, 1965 - SS 12 Pages 48 & 49
12. Bea=d of Appeals Mioutes, October 6, 1965. Pages 50 & 31
13. Board of Appeals Minutes, October 13, 1965. Page 52
14. Building Board Mimtes, October 13, 1965. Page 53
15. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, October 14,
1965. Pages 101 - 108
16. Fridley Wasing and Redevelopment Authority
li'" Meeting Minutes, September 29, 1965. Pages 54 - -56
R'BGUTAR COUNCIL 1EMMG AGENDA ° OMBER 18, 1965 (CON3TNUED)'
)f
17.
Iridley Housing and Redeve'lopownt Authority
H"ting, -Minutes, October 6, 1965
Pages �7
- 59
1$.
Cos ications. �`.
Pages 60
- 71
(a) Midland Coups Addrans .
(b) 8tl1terman1 Road
(c) City Engineers Sic System (sylvan Hills)• ,
(d) MWs = 65 6 61st Avenue H.B. Crossover
.
(e) city Atto TRor. age claim
(f) City AttovrAyt Ballot
(S) Gronfteldt Quit Claim Deed
(b) local 49s Ong Affiliation
(i) Finance Dissectors Sever Bill
(j) Bader HniuA ng remits
19.
claim.
Page 72
20.
Batim0s.
Pages 73
4 74
21.
Ucenses:
pages 75
- 79
221
Tatitions. 27 -1965, 28 -1965, 29 -1965
Pages 80
- 86
23.
Quotattons= Balance of ?pae Park Cleanup
Pages 87
- 94A
24.
Resolution OrdwEng Preliativary Plans & Specifications -
ST 1966 -1.
Papa 95
- 97
23.
Resolution Ord"Ang Prellsinary Plans 6 Specifications-
ST 19W2 (State Aid)
page 9$
26.
Resolution Approving Mean and Special Provisions
and Elevations and Grades for T.H. 947 ftae the
South corporate limits of', the City of Fridley to
53rd Avenue'Vorthesot.
Pages 99
6 100
)f
RSGMM COUNCIL =TING AGENDA CM20TS - OCTOM 18, 1965
1. RSZM=G - C-20 AIM 1-1 SO R -3A - C. USMq - tAVVMI The notice of
hearing in on page 29, and the Ordinance for first reading to an
page 30 depending upon the Public Hearing. The Planning i0maissionms
rec�memendatioa that the rezoning be apptoved is on page 103.
2. VIM PLAT - SYLVAN HILbB PLAT 8s The Notice of Hearing is on
page 31. The planning Commission's reca®meadation that the plat be
appvoved is an page 203.
0W BIM MW.W I
3. BUM =G PS=W - 6001/6005 UliIVBBSM AVX= HORTAQAST - t4ASCOAPAVA,
(MUM 10 /4/65)$ Following the last mssting I talked to Mr. Wiivklalava
sad tried to explain to bin what I felt the COtmcil desired in d1ls sittes,
and since he dicta *t soma to understand, I'referred his also to counadim ,
Wright. I do not know at this writing whethair or not he has contacted
Councilman Wright, but I do know that I dtid not have any plans Or, specs
or any other iQforoation fray Marchiafava. Lost meetings discussion Is
on page 16.
4. ESTIMATE - Saw & ASgOCI us (TABum 9/20/65, 10/4/65) s Z have
received an itemised estimate from Smiley & Associates, but the.
Finance Director has not completed checking it out against previous
estimates and.also -the contract, so I will have to submit this to
you at the matting.
5. SUP IQTAL MAIt1'II:NA1�1G8 A� - Y = CoLtw1A HgIo
(TABLED 10/4/85' - 0#12s This stem and item 6 below have not been
resolved yet by Columbia Heights, so,1 will not have anything for 7m
at this msstins, unless, Columbia Heights should come up with something
on Monday.
6. 8 UPP1ElBa1TAL SSCRW : Ago== - FdIDLEY - CMtf U BBI=$ - 88#12
(TOM 10/4/65)3 1 have explained this item 1A item 5 above.
7. AGROREW WM'H CMXKUA =IQ= - SS012
' (UJa ZD 1014165)t his Resolutiacs to an pap 32. Action on thts' •aalid-
depend upan the results in Items 5 and 6 abovs.
8. IRapOSED AMMUM TO cUMR 56 - SIGN (TMW 8/16/650 9/20/65,
10/4/65)t This Ordinance is on pages 33 through 42. 1 have veaetved
nothing from the chamber of Comtm wce or the tasgue of Ronan Voters
as yet.
9. SWW no=(; (W OBDUMC6 AWD=G CBAPTAR 24 - PMU AHD RATION
t2 88I0�it 'this Ordinance for second reading is on pages 43 throu&
45.
L.J
REGULAR COIiMCIL MERTING A(MDA CMWNTS - OCTOBER 18, 1965 (COiMNUBD)
NEW BiB3INE$S:
10. BIDS: OPWW NOON OCTOBER 11, 1965 - W -75 Cs The bids, as I wrote tbm
dawn upon opening, will be found on pages 46 and 47. Included in the
envelope with the agenda is a tabulation and a recoammendation.
11. BIDS: OFZW NOW OCTO08B 11, 1965 - 33#12: The bids, as I wrote tbas
down at the opening, are on pages 48 and 49. Included in the evelope
with the agenda is a typewritten tabulation of the bids. We have had no
reply from Columbia Heights relative to these bids as yet.
12. BOM Or APPEALS XUtUTBS, OCTOBER 6, 1965: These minutes are on pages
50 and 51. In item one the Board recommended the variance, and I will
have more detail for you at the meeting. In items two and three the
Board referred the request to the Planning Commission and the action of
the Planning Commission on theme requests will be found on page 105,
Item eight and nine. In item four the matter was continued until the
next mating.
13. BOARD OF AM= MIWTKS, OC1bBBg 13, 1965: These minutes are an page 52.
Ia both items the Board recosotem3I granting the variances, and I will have
more detail for you at the am»ting.
• 14. BUILMG BOARD NUMS1, OCT'OBSR 13, 1963: Tice minutes are on page 59.
The Bounding Board felt that it had no jurisdiction in the first item,
and recommended that the Building Permit be granted in the second item.
I will have the Pleas and specifications available for your consideration.
at the mating.
15. P!LAMWQ COMWI88itff METING MINUTES, OCTOBER 14, 1965: These minutes are
an pages 101 through 108. ;u aLtemm one on pages 101 through 103 the
Commission recommends denial of the reasoning request. If the Council
*occurs with this reemma mdation and the petitioner does not request a
public gearing before the Council, no further action need be taken other
than to concur with the Planning Commissions recommendation. Item two
and three on page 103 have been discussed in items one and two above.
A letter frame Mr. Hodue relating to item two will be found on page 106.
There is no action required by the Council relative to item four. In
item five on page I" the Commission recommends the Tot Split. There is
a drawing of the Lot Split on page 107 and a location drawing an page 108.
In items six on page 104 there In no action. In item seven on pages 104
and 105 the Lot Split is recommended for approval. I will have the
drawings for you at the meeting. Items eight and nine on page 105 are
discussed in item 12 of these comments. Items ten on page 105 involves my
property, and I will have letters from Northwestern Bell and Northern
States Power relinquishing ashy interest they insight Have in the west two
feet of time six foot easement on the east line of may property.
16. rRIDIZY HOUSING AND BEDSVELO"NT AUTRITT METING MIN1=8, SEPWAM 29,
1965: Those minutes are on pages 54 through 56. Any item that you wish
to discuss can'be discussed at this time.
_ . REM= COUNCIL MMUG AGENDA CMWENTS . OCTOBER 18, 1965 (CONTINUED)
17. FRIDWY HOUSING AND BEDtSVBI ___ AUTHORITY MMTiNG MINUTES, OCTOBER 6,
1965% these minutes are on pages 57 through 59. Any Item that you wish
to discuss cam be discussed at this tfmiee.
l8. COIk�IICIl►TL►TIQN%
(8)
Midland Coops Address
The letter an page 60 is self - explanatory. Since receiving this
iettes I have written to the 81ahway Department asking that they put
-in writing vhttlher of not HISbway 100 Brill be designated 8igl y 59dr.
(b)
Salite;rment Road
The letter on page 61 is self - explanatory. I do not '..,oe exactly what
he wants. f
(c)
City 8ngineer% Sever System (Sylvan Hills).
Mr. Ernest Powell called and said that a delegation from Sylvan Hills
wanted to appear at the Council Meeting to find out what is being
done about Sylvan Hills. This .soemo, page 62, coy: z,3 •,,a helpful at
this time, although, I advised Mr. Povell`that there were matters
Involving Columbia Heights and NSSSD, etc. which would probably
prevent the Council from giving any kind of firm answer at.this
meeting.
(d)
IM: TH #65 and 61st Avenue Northeast crossover.
The previous City Engineer had advised we that when the State
approved West Moore Take Drive at Highway 65 as a State Aid road,
they had provided a crossover for the City. Mr. Qureehi then
.
Investigated and unearthed this letter of 1964, page 69, which
indicates that Council would have to take formal action to ask the
State for a crossover at that point.
(e)
City Attorney: Damage Claim.
The letter on page 64 Is self - explanatory.
(f)
City Attorneys Ballot
The letter on page 65 is self - explanatory.
(S)
Gronfields Quit Cleft Deed.
The letter on page 66 is self - explanatory. In the deed on pager 67 I
note that he mentions abating the asseaasaeuts, and in talking to
Mr. aroafield yesterday he gave me authorisation to change it to
payment In the =:ount of $1540.08 for the easeesmeent. The Connril can accept
this Quit Claim Dead with the corrections if you so desire.
(h)
bacal 49s Engineering Affiltation=
The letter on page 68 is self - explanatory. The members nom belonging
to this union are listed on page 69. This is for information only
and can be received and filed.
(I)
Finance Directors Sever Bill
The memo an page 70 is somewhat self - explanatory. Mrs. Schour advises
that they ware.renttng the property out at the time this sewer charge
was not placed against the property, and therefore, feel that they
should not be obligated to pay at least $80 of the $160 since the ;
tenants should have paid it and they did not know they should be
collecting it from the tenants. Apparently this ssmount was placed
against the taxes previously so the $160.has been paid, but the
Squestion
now Is, and I believe Mrs. Schuur will be here, whether or
not the Council swishes to refund approximately $80.
(j)
Badee Building Persd.ts
The memo an page 71 has been preparod because of the motion made in the
last item of business Oat the last meeting on page 28.
REGULAR COUNCIL MTING AGERM COMMS - .00TOBER 18, 1965 (CONTINU$D)
19. CLAIM: Clain ' 'umbers are on page 72. Detail of the clams is included
In the envelope with time agenda.
20. EST,DPA?1tS: The lien of estimates is on pago 73. The debris cleanup
estimates are an page 74 and are not listed on page.73, so would require
separate actin.
21.' LIC8 8t Licenses are an pages 75 and 76. Registrations of multiple
dwei]lings are on pages 77 and 78. These can be approved, if the Cowell
wish**, by the anal motion. On page 79 is an applicatiea for a site
pewit which i bave placed an tke agenda because this to for the sign
site previously permitted, and is a great deal larger than the signs
ubicb will be permitted in the now ordinance if it is passed la, Its
present forts. 'I felt that by placing this out the agenda, if the Council
melt the sign was too large, perhaps you -could talk the applicant into
complying with the proposed new ordinance.
22. PETITIONS: Petitions 27 through 29 will be found on pages 80 through 83.
There is same additional material on pages 84 through 86, which pert p►s
Councilmen Wright can e$plain slate the petitioners not with his relative
to petition 29. The problem requested to be solved on page 81 has been
resolved by the City by nodding the area of Johnson Street down -to
iagbway 100.
23. QU022TTOW - BALAHM OF LOC1t6 PARK C ZANUPt The quotations are an pages
• 87 through 94 A. They are both on an bwrly rate and a base bid rate.
These ale the bidders that gave the City quotations when the JC's
received a portion of Locke Park cleanup. Vhoever gets the job would be
paid by the Federal funds out of the OEP. There was no formal advettlessm tt
for bads since the first request and the subsequent award to the JCss was
made without a formal bid notice. At this writing I have not analysed these
quotations so I cannot make a recommendation, but I will have done so by
,Meeting time.
24. nOOLDTION SING PRBL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - ST 1966 -Zs
To assist the Engineering Department in getting design work done early
for the 1966 street program, I present this Resolution.on pages 95
througb 97 eo that the necessary legal steps, including the Public 8eariags
on the Improvements, can be held so that the Engineering Department cam have
the winter to work en design. There undoubtedly will be petitions for
more streets than those listed here on this Resolution, but this will at
least get us off to a good start for next years program. Included In the
envelope with the agenda to this saw Resolution, but per cent of signers
is added.
25. AESOLUTIO!B ORDERING PMIARY PLANS AND SNCIFICATIOUS - ST .1966 -23
(STATS AID): The Resolution on page 98 is for State Aid work that can be
done because the City will have sufficient funds to do it. It is up to
the Council to provide the priority for State Aid work and, thezefore,
those lusted in these resolution are merely suggestions based upon previous
actions by the City Council.
26. itBSQLfTi'ION APPROMG Mims AND SPSCIAL PRMVWONS AND EUVATIONS AND GBADBS
FOR ?.8. $47 FRCK THE SGUft I01PORATS xMTS OF THE CITY OF FMMIBY TO 53RD
AViX NMTBWTt Tate Resolution on pages 99 and 100 Se for the 'pic't• ;on
REGULAR OWNCM 02MG AGMM CQMMTS - 0MVM 18, 1965 (OMMSM)
tat Highway 47 that involves a storm drainage problem with Columbia Heights.
I do not know whether or not you Will wish to pass this before reaching
agyreement with Columbia Heights, but the City Attorney can advise whether
or not it should be passed if the State Highway Department feels they
need approval at this meeting,.
Would you,please check your calendars or whatever you use to-keep track
of your appointments, so that at the meeting it can be determined that
would bd the best time and date for the Council to meet with the Architect
on the City Halt so that - perhaps a satisfactory good set -up can be
arranged fors January opening in the hopes that bids will be received
that are within the financial resources of the City.
TSB MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 1965
A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order
by Mayor Nee at 8:05 Pate
ROrZL CAM:
ME= PRESENT: Nee, Kirkham, Sheridan, Thompson, Wright (Wright arrived
at 8 :07 B. M.'
MUBBRS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL (�W IMMS • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 20 1965
Motion by Kirkham to adopt the winutes of the Regular Council Meeting of
Septesiber 20, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC TARING
ASSSSSMW ROLL SSVW #58 (COMT RW FROM 8/23/65, 911/65, 9/20/65):
Councilman Sheridan stated that he examined the records concerning
Mr. Cochran's special assessment payments and discussed then with the
Finance Director. He stated that, from all comments made concerning these
assessments and after a review of same, it is his belief the assessment roll,
as given by the Finance Director, is correct and should be adopted. Be
stated that if Mr. Cochran disagrees, Mr. Cochran should have the "records
examined by some impartial person or the courts in order to settle the dispute.
Mr. Cochran asked the amount of the charges for Lot #5 in Don's 5th Addition.
Councilman Sheridan stated that then* charges are $1,524.00. Mr.Cocbran
asked whether he could be charged for a sewer line which is not there.
Councilman Sheridan said that the line is there and can provide service to
Lot #5.
Mr. Cochran stated that he paid $1100 for a direct connection to his building,
co mecting to it from the back. Councilman Shieidan stated that this charge was
not for Lot 5, but this charge was for a building located an Lot 15 in
Auditor's Sub - Divison #88. Councilmen Sheridan stated that it is the policy
of the City to charge a property owner for the cost of providing service to
his property when he connects to a sever system for which the property was
not assessed. Nr. Cochran stated that he paid $1100 to make the connection
to his building on Lot 15, Auditor's Sub - Division No. 88. Mr. Cochran stated
that he does not like to take the case to court, but he believes this to the
only way to settle the diopte. Councilman Sheridan stated that the charge to
which Mr. Cochran referred at a previous Council Meeting concerning Lot 15,
Auditor's Sub - Division No. 88 was for an additional building site on Pierce
Street for which Mr. Cochran had not paid previously. Mr. Cochran stated that
he paid the special assessment against this extra lot when he paid the
assessments for the sub- divison. Mr. Cochran stated that he was charged $1150
to make the connection to the line. He stated that he paid for construction
MINUTES OF 10 /4/65 PACE 2
of the lateral along Pierce Street by the foot, and every foot was paid for.
Mr. Cochran stated that the charge on the postcard to which he referred was
for a connection to the building located on Lot -15, Auditor's Sub - Division
#88, and this charge was X1100. .Councilman Aright asked Mr. Cochran whether
this charge was for both sewer and water services, and Mr. Cochran answered,
"Yes."
The Finance Director stated that before Don's 5th Addition was platted, the
City charged property owners for the construction of sewer and water services
by the building site. Be stated that up to this time it had been assummsd
there would be eight building sites in this seb- division. He stated that if
the contention of Mrs Cochran is correct, that the charge assessed against
his property was for building sites along Central Avenue, then there are nine
building sites along Pierce Street for which Mr. Cochran has only paid assess -
mants on eight building sites. Mr. Cochran stated that he does not believe
this is correct. He stated that he has received charges given on a per front
foot basis. Councilman Sheridan stated that it was the practice at one time
to assess 75% of the cost of construction on a per building site basis and
257. on a per front foot basis. Mr. Cochran stated that he received from the
Finance Department statements for each of the nine lots on Pierce Street
stating that the special assessments had been paid in full for each of these
nine lots. He stated that he obtained these statements when he conveyed a
dead for these properties to the persons, and that one property owner, after
receiving the deed, had been charged $900 for the special assessments. The
Finance Director stated that if the contention of Mr. Cochran is correct,
that he has not paid for special assessments on Central Avenue, then he has
• still not paid for one building site on Pierce Street. Councilman Wright
asked Mr. Cochran whether he had the nine statements of the assessments, to
which he was referring, with him at the Council Meeting. Mr. Cochran answered
that he did not have all of them with him. Mr. Cochran did not produce any
of the documents.
The Finance Director stated that he made one assessment roll on the basis of
no assessments on Lot 5 in Don's Sth Addition along Pierce Street. He stated
that if it is the opinion of the Council that Mr. Cochran does not ova the
City for special assessments on Lot 5, the Council could adopt this roil.
Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Cochran if, when he requested rezoning of the
property, he did not have a preliminary plat of the property. Councilman
Sheridan stated that the Council would not consider rezoning of the property
without some knowledge of the use which the property owner intended to make
of the property, this use would require same form of preliminary plat.
Mr. Cochran stated that the lots were not split up at the time the property
was rezoned.
Mayor Nee asked Mr. Cochran whether he examined the records of the Finance
Director. Mr. Cochran stated that he examined the rawrds of the Finance
Director but he found that so many of the records were crossed out that he
could not understand these records.
Councilman Sheridan asked the Finance Director whether it was correct that
the amounts paid by Mr. Cochran for which Mr. Cochran contends he paid for
construction along Central Avenue were applied to the property on Pierce Street.
Mr. Brunsell stated that, thie.is correct, that Mr. Cochran paid for construction
along Pierce Street.
Mayor Yea asked Mr. Cochran whether he contends that he made one lump sum
payment for construction of sewer and ovater services along Pierce Street and
MINUM OF 10/4/65 PAGE 3
the one additional charge was for construction along Central Avenue. Mr. Cochran
stated that this is correct. Mayor Nee asked the Finance Director whether he
• assessed the cost of all of the construction of the line on Pierce Street.
The Finance Director stated that any lot or building site which had not paid
for the cast of construction on Pierce Street must pay for this construction
when connection is made to it. Mayor Nee stated that he believes the argument
hinges upon whether Mr. Cochran paid for all of the building sites along Pierce
Street. Mr. Cochran stated that this was not correct, that the charge which
the City is nuking to him is for sewer and water services along Central Avenue.
lbe Finance Director asked Mr. Cochran whether he ,Mill owns Outlot 1.
)ft. Cochran answered, "Yes." Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Cochran whether his
building in located on Lot S. Mr. Cochran answered no that his buildiag.is
located on Oaatlot 1. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Cochran whether he In
contesting the assessment for construction of the sewer wain crossing Outlot 1.
Mr. Cochran answered, "Yes ". He stated that water lines are presently in
existence on three sides of Outlot 1 and sewer on one side. He stated that
he could connect to any of these lines and he does not see why he should be
charged for another sewer line crossing Outlot 1. Councilman Wright informed
Mr. Cochran that the sealer line crossing Outlot 1 is a grain of the utility
system which is paid for by the entire City and not paid by special assessments.
Mr. Cochran stated that he receives no benefit from the construction of this
main. Councilman Wright informed Mr. Cochran that he could pay the lateral
charge for connection to the sewer and contest the charge for the crossing if
he wished to do so. Mr. Cochran stated that if he were to make connection to
sewer services, he would co =ect to the main rather than to the lateral. Council-
man '(dright asked the Finance Director whether Mr. Cochran could indeed connect
to the main in the back of the property and whether be would be charged for
40 making such a connection. The Finance Director stated that Mr. Cochran could
awake a connection to the main ,across the back of the property, that connection
to the main would cost him more for construction of the connection than assessments
for connection to the lateral.
Mr. Comstock stated that construction on Central Avenue was made upon request
from Anoka County to complete all services before Anoka County improved Old
Central. Anoka County stipulated that there would be no new construction on
Old Central for a period of five years after improvement of the streets.
Mr. Comstock notated that a hearing had been held in connection with the proposed
construction along Old Central of services needed in the future. If the City
installed these services before Central Avenue was droved, the City could
construct these services in an open trench, whereas, if the City were to wait
until after Old Central was improved, it would be necessary to jet and tunnel
under Old Central Avenue to make connections. Mr. Comstock stated that it was
difficult to determine where crossings should be made at Old Central Avenue since
this property is not developed. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Comstock whether it would
make sense to construct a sewer lateral along Central Avenue and justify such
construction as part of the sewer main construction which normally is financed
by general funds. Mr. Comstock answered that it would make sense to do this
from an engineering view point. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Comstock whether he could
visualise any benefit to Mr. Cochran from such a construction. Mr. Comstock
answered that it would be passible for Mr. Cochran to develop this land in
such a way to connect to this newly constructed rosin on Central Avenue.
Mr. Cochran stated that he arcade connections to his building from Pierce Street
• in 1962 or 1963.
MINUTES OF 10/4/65 PAGE 4
Mr. Comstock stated that the sewer line on Old Central runs closer to any
buildings which would be located along Old Central than does the main behind
Outlot 1. Be stated that the building lots along Old Central which would be
platted in Outlot 1 would have more than the usual depth, and it is conceivable
that Outlet 1 would be split into two roes of loge rather than one row because
of the depth of one roes. it is conceivable that it would be necessary for the
lots split on the west half of Outlet 1 to need sewer service from the present
main installed across the back of Outlot 1. Mr. Cochran stated that the City
ordinance requires that buildings along Central Avenue have a 100 foot set -back.
He stated that with such a large set -back, it is not conceivable to split Outlot I
and have two rows of lots on Outlot 1, Be stated that with a 100 foot set -back
the buildings will be closer to the nearer main built across the back of Outlet 1
than to the sewer main built on Central Avenue.
Councilman Sheridan asked whether, if the assessments were paid on Outlot 1,
Mr. Cochran could hook up either to the sewer main in back of Outlot 1 or to
the sewer main on Central Avenue. line Finance Director stated that this to
correct and if connection is made to a system for which the property bas not
been assessed the property comer making such a connection would be required to
pay his portion of the cost of construction. The Finance Director stated farther
that he believes Mr. Cochran thought the charge made to him in 1962 was for
services on Central Avenue, whereas, it was for services on Pierce Street.
Mr. Cochran asked whether the VFW building will be assessed for construction
along Central Avenue. The Finance Director stated that the VFW is not
assessed for this construction.
• Lotion by Kirkham to close the hearing on the assessment roll for SSb8W #58.
Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC
ASSBS +IT_„a8, ML - 1965 SERA COMMCTiONS;
The City Manager read the Notice of Bearing.
The Finance Director stated that it is the purpose of the hearing to determine
whether persons who connected to sever and water systems and have not paid the
full cost of these connections should be assessed for the connections in lieu
of paying the full charge at the time of connection.
Mayor tree asked whether anyone had any questions or objections concerning the
assessment roll for 1965 service connections. There were no objections to the
assessment roll.
Mayor Nee declared the hearing closed.
PUBIZSC H8A8 MG
(M HMM33-.8%
The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing.
Us City MwaWr stated that this Public Bearing was held to determine whether
a teuaber of small #improvement projects for which the City received petitions in
KEW= Cp 10/4/65
PAGE 5
the past too late to include the work in a construction project In 1965 should
be constructed during the following construction season. He stated that the
total cost of all these small projects is $48,634.80.
SSM AND WATER MAINS AND Lk7ERAIS - DON'S 5TH ADDIT109%
Mr. Jams?. Wilson, 1319 75th Avenue Nortbeast and Mr. Michael Svitak, 1381
75th Avemae Northeast, were present at the Council Meeting. They stated that
they received notice of the hearing and mare asking the Council why their
property is included in this project. They both stated that they have service
connections for sager aged water to their lots. Mayor Nee answered that notices
are sent to property owners in the surrounding area in order to insure that
all who may benefit from construction of the project will receive notice of
the project and all of them area °t necessarily included in the project. The
City Engineer stated that this portion of the project is made at the request of
Don Anderson for service lines running from 75th Avenue into the cul -de -sac
where he has a house under construction and wants to run services to this house.
He stated that although this line goes near these properties, these properties
do have service connections, and these properties are not included in this
project. Mayor Nee asked whether there were any other questions concerning
this portion of the project. There were no other comments or questions
concerning this portion of the project.
The City Engineer stated that this construction was planned at the request of one
. property owner who was ordered to connect to City sewer and water services. The
City Engineer stated that, since this is sooewhat of an emergency, it is possible
that if the weather is good this part of the project could be added to another
contract with the contractor in Innsbruck 5th Addition. He stated, however,
that the contractor working in Innsbruck 5th Addition did not want to install
the sewer laterals since he believes the price for which he is presently working
is too low for construction of sewer laterals.
Mrs. Edward Sakry, 6450 East River Road, Mrs. Ralph Waldrop, A28 East River Road,
Mrs. Walter Luckow, 6460 East River Road, were present at the Council Meeting
and Mrs. Sakry stated that there has been a septic tank in service on their
property for 15 years and they have had no trouble with this septic tank. She
stated that they do not wish to connect to the sanitary sewer or to water
services at this time. Mayor Nee informed Mrs. Sakry that if she does have
trouble with her septic tank, she will be ordered to connect to the sanitary
seder Wesdiately and that it would be to her benefit to have the sanitary sewer
oervites in the street in case such an emergency should arise. Mrs. Sakry
stated that she has had no trouble with the septic tank for 15 years and sees no
reason why she should have nay trouble with it in the future, although, she to
aware that other people have had trouble with their septic tanks. The Mayor
Informed Mrs. Sakry that the City would like to construct a street, if the
property owners would petition for the construction of same, but before the
street is constructed it will be necessary for the City to have sewer and water
services installed in the street. Councilman Wright asked Mrs. Sakry whether
she is opposed to construction of sewer and water services at this time. Mrs.
• Sakry answered that she and Mrs. Waldrop object to the construction of the
sanitary sewer services but they will allow such services to be constructed and
MINUTES OF 10/4/65 PAGE 6
would be willing to pay the assessments for this construction. Councilman
• Wright stated than the City is concerned that fire and emergency vehicles will
have difficulty obtaining access to this property if the street in this area
Is not improved, but before the City improves the streets in this area it will
be necessary for the City to install the proper sewer and water services in the
street. Mayor Nee informed Mrs. Sakry that one of her neighbors needs construction
of the sewer main badly.
Mr. C. Breyley, 6454 East River Road, was present at the Council Meeting and
stated that he favors this construction since after sewer and water services
are installed, the City can Improve the road. Mr. Breyley stated that he
already has sewer and water services to his property. Mayor Nee stated that
tbfty were no strenuous objections to the construction of this improvement.
NORTH SIRS OSBORNB ROAD FROM EAST RIVER ROAD TO THE QOAD TUM-.
Mayor Nee stated that this proposed construction is for the benefit of three
property owners. The City Engineer stated that these three property owners
were ordered by the health officer to connect to the sanitary sewer. Mr. Comstock
`stated that the cost of connection to the sewer lateral running in the sight -of-
way along Osborne Road is extremely high. He stated that the cost of connection
could be reduced if the property owners could wake a service connection from the
rear of the property and obtain an easement for the connection across adjoining
property to East River Road along the easement of the St. Paul water works. He
stated that this would require construction of a sin inch service line..
DONw S FIPTH AD MOU-a
Mayor Nee stated that this was for construction of storm sewer only. 7bers weft
no objections to this portion of the isrgrovement.
ELY STREET NCRTHEAST AND DOVER STET NORTHEAST BETWEEN BROAD AVENUE AND EAST
RIMER ROADS
The City Engineer explained that it is the purpose of this construction to drain
water standing in the road in Ely Street and in Dover Street along Block K.
Mayor Nee stated that it is necessary to pave this street but the street cannot
be paved until the water is drained from the street. Several of the property
owners objected to the site of the drainage district. They stated that water
drains from ot-her areas in the district and the drainage district should be
larger than it is planned is the project. Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer
that is the reliability of the drainage district. The City Engineer stated
that the drainage district is as shown on the project plans. Mr. Comstock stated
that someone owned two houses in a marsh and that this water formerly drained
into the marsh. Since the owner filled in the marsh and built upon this property,
the water drains into the road and is not standing there. There Was a lengthy
discussion between the Council and many of the property owners concerning this
construction.
Mr. Arnold Englund, 4 70 Ely Street Northeast, owner of Lots 18, 19, 20 and 21 in
Block S of Spring Brook Park Addition objected to this construction on the grounds
he did not receive any benefit from the construction. Mr. Donald Hostetter, owner
of lot 40, Block K in Riverview Heights, sent a written objection coaceraiag this
project.
MINUTES OF 10/4165
FRIDLBY STREET FRW 66TH AVENUE NORTHEAST TO 67TH AVENUE NORTHEAST:
0 There were no objections to this portion of the construction.
MISSiSSIJM PLACE AT STVERVIEW TERBACEs
There were no objections to this portion of the construction.
Mayor Nes declared the hearing closed.
PAGE 7
Councilman Vright stated that be believes it would be better to adopt the
assessment roll with the assessments on Lot 5 in Dan** 5tb Addition deleted
from the roll. Mayor Has stated that he favors adopting the save assessment
roll and that if Mr. Cochran should matte a connection to the storm seer on
Central Avenue then Mr. Cochran Mould be charged rith the connection costs
and the portion of the project cost assessible against this property. Councilman
Sheridan informed Mr. Cochran that the Council proposes not to assess Lot 5 in
Don's 5th Addition for this construction, but will assess for construction of
the improvmoenta benefitting Outlot 1. Be stated that the amount of this
assessment would be $40135.12. Mr. Cochran noted that this amount is higher
than the assessment given in the prior roll for Outlot 1. Mayor Nee stated
that deleting assessments from Lot 5 in Don's Sth addition raises the assessments
to the other properties. Mr. Cochran asked if he were to build upon Outlot 1
• vould he be charged an additional amount for connection to the storm sewer
system on Central Avenue. The Finance Director answered that he would not be
charged for making this connection to buildings on Outlot 1.
Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #176 -1965 and include the alternate
assessment roll with assessments at the rate of $8.14 per front foot. Seconded
by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unani-
mously.
k'lL0i8D lNDI�NT TO CHAP'iSR 56 -SIGNS �TABLSD 8/16165, 9/20/65):
Motion by Sheridan to table consideration of the proposed amendment to Chapter 56
until a final report has been received From the Chamber of Commerce concerning
the proposed amendment to Chapter 56. Seconded by Thompson.. Upon a voice vote,
there being no caps, the motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Wright to adopt the Ordinance Amending Chapter 24 upon first reading.
Seconded by Sheridan. Mayor Nee stated that there was no request to read the
Ordinance. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
(ZDRK= DESIGN& TIAiG CHA= 20 - KWBIM DISTRIBUTION 9/20/151:
The City Manager stated that copies of the ordinance were mailed to the persons
as requested by Council. The City Attorney stated that he did not believe the
Chamber of Commerce has met and considered this ordinance sisce it was :referred
to them. He stated that he believes the board of the chamber of Commerce will
want to consider this ordinance before the Council adapts it.
HINUNS aW 10/4/65 PAGE 8
Notion by Thompson to table to the regular Council Meeting of November 1, 1965
consideration of the Ordinance Designating Chapter 20 - Handbill Distribution.
Seconded by Wight. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
BBAF LZMG RESOLUTION #144 -1965 (TAB= 9/20165)_0
The City Attorney stated that the reason the Council was asked to reaffirm
this resolution is that an ameamdmsnt was made to the resolution. Be stated
that the amount requested for this project has been reduced to $79,769.00
and the description has been altered in order to better describe the project
area.
Motion by Wright to adopt the corrected version of Resolution #144 -1965.
8ecoodded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Kirkham voting no, the
mr -fion carried,.
SAID WDENG OF MIMANCB NO. 312 'TO AMB W SECTION 77.01 - BEACS CLOSING
Motion by Wright to adopt Ordinance #312 amending Section 77.01 upon second
reeding and publish same. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. , .
$8 88ADING Ol+' Ar'P8O]P'BIAT, OLV ODINANCE NO. 313. - 19658
r .r r r - r�..r.rrrrr�.r..r ...n.r.r
notion by Birkhem to adapt the Appropriation Ordinance No. 313 for 1966 upon
second reading and publish same. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nay ;a, the motion carried unanimously.
SAM WAR 2 COY - ABATE ASSESSMENTS:
M =. Ward Gronfield was present at the Council Besting representing the Sacked
Heart of Jesus Catholic Church. He stated that he has not heard the report
of the City Attorney nor the City Finance Director concerning the request of
the Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic Church to abate assessments on the cemetery.
Mr. Gronfield stated that he believes it is doubtful whether it is proper
and legal under Chaper 308 of the Minnesota Statutes to assess cemetery property.
He stated that in any event he does not believe that the cemetery benefits from
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water services along cemetery
property. Be stated that the emote" owners believe they will benefit from
construction of street improvements, curb and gutter. Mr. Gronfield stated
that the cemetery owners are willing to remove the fence on the street eaaNiat,
if the assessment is abated, to allow for improvement of the street. Mr. Gronfield
stated that there is some question whether the cemetery has dedicated an easement
to the City for construction of 54th Avenue Northeast but the cemetery is
trilling to dedicate whatever interest the cemetery has in the property to the
City.
Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney whether he agrees with Mr. Gronfieldms
contention that under Chapter 307 of the Minnesota Statutes there awn be no
assessments placed against cemetery property. The City Attorney amPered that
Statute 307 is a new statute and does provide that cemetery property can ®t be
taxed or assessed. He stated, however, that there is a question whether
I
MnWWS OF 1014/65
PAGE 9
• this cemetery property fits the definition of cemetery property given in
the statute.
Mar. Brows Smoke was present at the Council Meeting representing the
cemetery owners. He stated that this land has been used as a cemetery for
51 years from the time it was first provided to the Sacred Heart of Jesus
Catholic Church. He stated that markings on the graves substantiate that
this land has been used as a cemetery for 51 years.
Mr. Gronfield stated that he believes it was the intent of the legislature
In adopting Statute No. 307 that property which has been dedicated for
cemetery use should be tax free and assessment free.
Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer whether the City should build 54th Avenue
Northeast to offset around the cemetery property. The City Engineer replied
that the owner of the property south of the cemetery is willing to give the
City a five foot easement if he can include this 5 foot easement in the lot
area in order to comply with the coning ordinances requiring a mfniasua
amount of property for construction of a four -plex. The City Engineer
stated, further, that if the street is built upon the easement included
inside the cemetery fence it would be necessary,to remove six trees from the
easement.
The City Attorney stated that the street now named 54th Avenue Northeast
had been dedicated to the Township at an earlier date as a town road, and
• the cemetery owners moved out, fenced the easement dedicated to the town -
ship and put a grave upon this easement, apparently with no objection on
the part of the Township officials, Village officials or City officials at
any time. The City Attorney stated that Mr. Gronfield raised the question
of whether or not the City is estopped from claiming this easement since
it has allowed the cemetery to build a grave upon the easement. Mr. Smoka
stated that eleven years ago when the cemetery built a new fence upon the
same location, he inquired of the Village officials whether there was any
objection to construction of the fence at this location. He stated that
the Village officials informed him that the street at this point is 30
feet vide and that this fence can be built in this location. He stated
that cemetery owners moved the fence two feet back from what they believed
to be the property at this time with the concurrence of the Village officials.
Mr. Gronfield stated that he would suggest a compromise. The City may need
a thirty foot easement and instead of construction of a proper retaining
wall along the easement the City could slope the lased, build a fence at the
top of the slope and have the park maintenance men maintain the slope.
Mr. Gronfield stated that the cemetery owners are willing to accept
assessments for street improvements and in return for granting this easement
to the City and moving the grave upon the easement, the cemetery owners wish
to have the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water assessments abated.
Councilman Sheridan asked what the amount of the assessments are against
the property. Mr. Gronfield answered that there is a charge of $1500 for
construction of sewer and water improvements. Mr. Gronfield stated that
•
the cemetery does not use sever or water, and that the cemetery property
drains toward T.H. #100 such that the cemetery receives no benefit from
MINU7Z8 OF 10/4/65 PAGE 10
. construction of sewer and Water services or storm sewer drainage. The City
Engineer stated that if the cemetery property drains into the storm sewer
system along T. H. #100 the cemetery is liable for an assessment for
construction of the stores sewer system on T. H. #100 since it contibutes
water to this storm sewer system.
Mayer Nee asked Mr. Smoka ghat assurance the City has that the cemetery
would not use sever and water services in the future. Mr. Smoka answered
that the Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic Church has only 60 parishioners,
that it cannot afford to build upon this property and make construction
requiring sewer and water services. Mr. Smoke. said that he believes the
cemetery property benefits from construction of street improvements, but
does not benefit from construction of sever and water services.
Motions by Wright to abate the present assessments for construction of
sanitary sewer and water services against the cemetery property, to state that
it is the policy of the City not to place future storm sewer assessments
against the cemetery property upon receipt of a pledge from the cemetery
owners that they have no objections to street assessments and a dedication
to the City by the cemetery owners of their interest in the street easement
along 54th Avenue Soutbeast. Seconded by Sheridan.
Tine City Attorney stated that if the cemetery ov aere move the fence or allow
the City to move the fence and take out the grave upon the easement, the
cesrstery owners will be *stopped from claiming the easement as cemetery
• property in the future. Councilman Sheridan stated that rather than set the
precedent of not assessing the cemetery for storm sewer assessmen'-a, he
preferred that the City provide the cemetery owners with the sum of the
assessments in the form of a check, as paymnt for a deed to the street
easement, which the cemetery owners could sign and return to the City.
Motion by Sheridan to amend the motion to the effect that the City will
pay the cemetery owners the sum of the assessment for sewer and water
services in return for the street easement along 54th Avenue Northeast,
and an agreement on the part of the cemetery owners that, should the
land be used for purposes other than a cemetery, the owners would not
object to assessments against the property. Seconded by Wright, Upon a
voice votes there being no nays, the motion to amend carried unanimously.
IM , UPOiN TEE MIGINAL WMCtqt
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
HWM-. SERVICE DRIVES ALONG UNIVERSITY AVENUE
Motion by Wright to receive the communication from Hodne Associates
concerning the service drives along University Avenue. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
. ON � SIM= DRIVE ALONG EL VERSITY VSNUE AT 57TH AVENUE NORTWMT-.
Mr. Clarence Graves was present at the Council !Ming and Mr. Ward Gronfield
vas present representing Mr. Graves. Mr. Gronfield stated that he au"Tatood
IitNUtB8 CV 10/4165 PAGE 11
• a Building Permit was granted to Mr. Graves. He stated that Mr. Graves came
to the City Hall to pick up his Building Permit and did not receive the
Building Permit. The City Manager stated that the Building Inspector was
gone on vacation and he would ask the Building Inspector, upon his return,
why the Building Permit was not available to Mr. Graves.
Mayor Has shaped Mr. Gronfield and Mr. Graves the proposed plan of
Mr. Hodne for location -of the service drive along University Avenue.
Mr. Gronfield stated that he believes construction of this proposal will
reduce the value of the property to Mr. Graves. Mrs Gronfield stated
that construction of a traffic separating island in 57th Avenue Northeast
would destroy the value of the property for a service station. The City
Manager informed Mr. Graves that he believes the City will have a traffic
problems at this intersection which will pile tap traffic on 57th Avenue
Northeast and make it difficult for customers to obtain access to the
service station or leave the service station and obtain assess to 57th
Avenue Northeast. Mr. Graves stated that he has a problem convincing the
buyers of this property that such a traffic problem would reduce busiowm
to the service station. Mr. Gronfield asked whether it would be possible
to have both service drives built at this intersection. The City Manager
said that he believes this question should be studied.
Motion by Wright to refer consideration of chasages3 in the East Service
Drive. at 57th Avenue Northeast and University Avenue Northeast Last Service
Drive to the Administration, direct the Administration to refer plans and
• the coam eats of Mr. Gronfield and Mr. Graves to the Misaaesota Blowsy
Department engineers and ask for a conference with the Minnesota Highway
Engineers to design this intersection. Seconded by Thmpson. Upon a
voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously.
EAST SERVICE DRIVE ALWG UNIVERSITY AVENUE AT'NL&§SIPPI STBBST°
Councilman Wright stated that he spent some time reviewing plans for
construction of the service drive at the intersection of Mississippi Street
and University Avenue. He stated that be is convinced that the proposed of
Mr. Hodne should be carried out at the northeast and the southwest corners
of this intersection, at this time, regardless of whether there is an
Urbane Renewal project in this area. Councilman Kirkham stated that he
could not gee the value of changing the service road an the northeast
corner of this intersection as the service ro. -id only extends for two more
blocks beyond this intersection. Mayor Nee stated than it is necessary
to make plans to divert the service road, and there is a question haw
the service road location could be changed without damaging too much of
the property at the intersection.
Mayor Nee asked Mr. Tbei*en, who was present at the Council Meeting,
whether he would give the City an easement to relocate the service drive
In return for obtaining half of the present easement along the east
service road of University Avenue.. Mr. Theisen and Mr. Kranz discussed
relocation of the east service drive, the use of part of this easement by
the Minnesota Highway Departsamnt for snnoa storage, and the relocation of
the proposed Red Owl Store upon the property if the service road is
changed to such a location. Mr. Theisen stated that it will be necessary
HIMMS (V 1014/65 PAGE 12
for his to change his agreement with the mortgagee if the service road is
• changed since he old have to change the description of the land. Mr. Theisen
stated that he believes relocation of the service drive could be made without
harming the property. Councilman Wright pointed out that if the service.drive
Is relocated along the east line of the property, the objections of the property
owners to the east of the property concerning rezoning this property would be
reduced. He stated that it would be possible to rezone the residentially zoned
property north of the proposed location of the Red Owl Store if the property
owners to the east and north of this property do not object to this rezoning.
Mr. Theisen asked the.Council to grant a Building Permit for construction of
the store and stated that he would not construct the building until the City
had an opportunity to make an agreement with the Minnesota Highway Department
for relocation of the service drive. go suggested that once the agreement is
made between the City and the Minnesota Highway Department, he could begin
construction of the store- and the construction of the roads could take place
later. Mayor Pm asked Mr. Thelven how long he could wait for the City to reach
an agreement with the Minnesota Highway Department. Mr. Theisen answered that
he believes he could wait another month, that it is almost winter am and that
construction would then begin is the spring. Mr. Theisen stated that he needs
an extension of his mortgage commitment to delay.constaruction and he needs a
Building Permit in order to satisfy the agreements which he made. Councilman
Kirkham stated that all the committees and commissions of the City have
approved the request of Mr. Theisen for a Building Permit, that Mr. Theisen
has agreed to delay construction until the agreement can be made and he sees no
reason why Mr. Theisen should not be granted a Building Permit at this time.
Motion by Wright that the City adopt the general features of the Aodne plan for
relocation of the service drive at the intersections of 57th Avenue Northeast,
61st Avenue Northeast and Mississippi Street Northeast with University Avenue,
to request the Administration to work with the Minnesota Highway Department, to
obtain a change in the routing of the service drives in accordance with the plans
discussed by the Council this evening in so far as.practical, to effect:an
exchange of the easement of the east half of University East Service give with
za easement along the east side of the property of Mr. Theisen at University
Avenue and Mississippi Street and report to the Council concerning progress of
these negotiations at the regular Council Ming of- October 18, 1965. Seconded
by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Kirkham voting no, the motion
carried..
Potion by Wright that the Administration be authorized and directed to confer
with the Minnesota Highway Department and the property owner, to develop a
proposal, including the amount of any incidental costs involved in such a
proposal, for a trade of the present east half right•of-way of the University
Avenue East Service Drive for are easement located at.the east edge of the
property of Mr. Theisen betty -een Mississippi Street and 66th Avenue Northeast
and report concerning same to the Council at the regular meeting of October 18,
1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice votes there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
Motion by Wright that the Cite Administration confer with the Minnesota Highway
Department and the City Planner to develop a plan n=or the relocation of the
iWeet Service Drive of University Avenue on the southwat corner of Mississippi
XINMS OF 1014/65
PAGE 13
Street and University Avenge, such that the service drive will be relocated to
the west of the intersection and direct the Administration to prepare such a
proposal with a report of the costs incidental to the proposal for consideration
at the next regular Council Meeting of October 18, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
BUILDING BOARD MEETING MMMS, SEPTCKM 22. 1965:
BUMVG PRE= - JOHN MLM - CASHWAY STORE 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTBEAST.-
Motion by Kirkham to concur with the Building Board and the Safety Committee and
grant a Building Permit for construction of a Cashway Store at 6525 University
Avenue Northeast to Mr, Theisen and Mr. Do ,J. Karam. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
PSRMIT - $BEV = MMTENSON - HOWARD JOMZON RESTAURANT
Mr. Mortenson was present at the Council Meeting and showed the Council plans
of the construction. He stated that he originally asked the Council for a
fifty foot set -back for construction of the Howard Johnson Restaurant, but 709
would be the set -back as planned nom.
Lotion by Thompson to concur with the Building Board and grant the request of
Mr. Mortenson for a Building Permit for construction of a Howard Johnson
Restaurant at 5275 Central Avenue Northeast. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a
• voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Julkoiski was present at the Council Meeting and showed the Council plans
for construction of the apartment building. as stated that he will discuss
with the financiers of the project construction of a larger apartment building
as discussed at'the previous Council Meeting,;
Notion by Kirkham to concur with the Building Board and grant the request of
Mr. Julkoeski for a Building Permit for construction of a 32 unit apartment
building located at 215 Charles Street Northeast. Seconded by Thompson. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
$U%LDiNG PSR1iiT - Bmww agg WSKI - FURNITURE STME AT 1336 OSBORNE ROAD RMT1WAST
Councilman Iftight asked Mr. Julkowski what the plans are for draining the parking
lot in front of the store. Mr. ,talkowski showed the plans of the furnitaco
store to the Council. The City Engineor stated that since Mr. Julkanski Queue all
the plat surrounding the location of the furniture store in the City of Fridley,
he does not believe the City will have trouble with drainage on this part of
the property.
Notion by Thompson to concur.with the recacmendatiow —bf the Building Board and
• grant the request of .W4.. J 1kowski for a Building Permit to construct a
fuurui =use store at 1336 Osborne Road Northeast. Seconded by Wright. Upon a
" `i i`ca vote, UAre bei:ug rib nays, tLe motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES OF 10/4/65
PAGE 14
D BACK -FZi TNG - JULTOWSHIs
• Mayor Nee asked Mr. Julkowaki whether he has dredged the sludge from the ditches
upon his property. Nr. Julkowski answered that he has a contract with Farr,
Plumbing to do so and Mr. Farr assured him that this would be the first item
of work to be completed. The City Manager informed Mr. Julkowski that if he
does not dredge the ditches it'will be necessary for the City to do so and
charge Mr. Julkowski for the costs incurred. Mayor Nee informed Mr. Julkowski
that property owners have been flooded as a result of this ditch back - filling
all summer, and the past rains have continued to flood their property.
Mr. Julkowski stated that he believes Farr. Plumbing will dredge the ditches
as soon as weather permits.
Mr. Benjamin was present at the Council Meeting and asked the Council what the
City could do to maintain these streets. The City Engineer shored an aerial
map to the Council and explained the conditions of the streets where Mr. Benjamin
and his neighbors live. Mr. Benjamin stated that he and his neighbors want the
City to improve portions of Washington Street and Jefferson Street to 58th Avenue,
7he City Engineer stated that these roads are maintained. Mr. Benjamin stated
that these roads have b&ia plowed once in sixteen pears, and the last time gravel
vas put on these streets was five years ago. He said that he does not consider
this adequate maintenance. Councilman Sheridan pointed out to Mr. Benjamin that
only one -half of Jefferson Street could be built and that the entire assessment
• for this construction would be placed on the property owners on one side of the
street. He stated that the other half of Jefferson Street is not a dedicated
street and can °t be built and maintained. Mr. Benjamin stated that 807. of the
property owners owning 12 of 14 lots along Jefferson Street have petitioned
for this improvement. Councilman Wright asked whether it would be possible for
these two property owners to dedicate another thirty feet in order to build a
full street. Mr. Benjamin answered that when Donnay °s Addition was built,
the buildings were located on land on the other thirty ferf3t of the street and
that taking thirty feet of the street, on the wean side of the present easement,
would take the necessary front yard from his lots.
The City Manager stated that all the other property owners pay for Improvements
of paging, curb and gutter on the streets, Vnereas,€aryone in the City pays
for a graveled street, and construction of a gravel street has not been a
policy of the City. Mayor Nee- asked Mr,. Benjamin whether he would be willing
to accept assessments for construction of a gravel street- Mrs Benjamin stated
that he does not believe the cost would be great to build a gravel street.
Mayor Nee asked W. Benjamin tOhy he did not bury gravel and put it in the street.
Mr. Benjamin stated that the -sand in the *street is of such depth that it will
be necessary to remove a con:�;iderable ant of the sand and replace it with
rock before the gravel street could be built. He stated that he believes he
could sell the sand on the street easement except that the *treat doesn 'st
belong to him so he doeanet have the right to sell the sand. Mayor Nee
proposed to Mr. Benjamin that the City take the sand for its ow use and
Mr. Benjamin oupply the gravel and crushed rock necessary to fill and improve
• the street. Mr. Benjamin atated that he cold not commit himself to h a
project until he bad talked to the other property .:kraetrsi and obtained their
agreement.
The Coumcil took no action upon this matter.
MINUTES OF 10/4/65
PAGE 15
.
ARM Og CONTIACT • CO WPACT CAB:
The City Manager read the following list of bids and explained the bid
specifications for the compact cars
COVACT CAB
NAM (W FIN
SSCURTTr BID PRICE
TYee Ward Utter Sales
NO BID
131 W, Main Streat
Anoka, Minnesota
Miner Company
1708 Central Avemn N. B.
NO BM)
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Anderson Dodge -Dart
Certified Check
1966 bodge Dart
1201 East Lake Street
$97.90
$1958.00 30/40 days
Minneapolis, Minnesota
BrosdmW Chrysler- Plymouth
1527 West Bzoadway
NO BID
Minneapolis, Minnesota
•
Central Motor Sales, Inc,
Certified Check
1966 Valiant V100
2007 Central Avemw No E,
$95.00
$1900.00 30 days
Minneapolis, Minnesota
River Motors
656 East Main street
NO BID
Anoka, Minnesota
Downtown Chrysler- Plymouth
1518 Hennepin Avenue NO BID
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Maio Motor Sales Company Certified Check 1966 Chevy II
222 East Main Street $100.00 $1898,00 40 days
Anoka, Minnesota
Northside Mercury- Cosset
Soo West Broadway NO BID
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Midway Dodge, Inc.
1013 University Avenue NO BID
St. Paul, Minnesota
• Jack Mmlligan Ford, Inc.
683 Bast 7th Street NO BID
St. Paul, Minnesota
MINUTES OF 10 /4/65
PACE 16
DATE OP
NAME OF FIRM SECURITY BID PRICE DELIVERY
Midway Ford Company
1850 University Avenue NO BID
St. Paul, Minnesota
Attentions Ned Brandt
Downtown Chevrolet Co.
1301 Harmon Place NO BID
Minneapolis, Minnesota
rAM -Behr Chevrolet, Inc.
1625 West Broadway NO BID
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Larson Chevrolet, Inc.
420 Central Avenue N. Z. NO BID
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Osseo Motor Company
208 Central Avenue NO BID
Osseo, Minnesota
Central Rambler Sales Certified Check
2628 Central Avenue N. S. $83.90
Hine"polIA Minnesota
Larse; Bob - Ford Company
107 Central Avenue
Anoka, Minnesota NO BID
Eobb Rambler
654 'university Avenue NO BID
Stn Paul, Minnesota
1965 Rambler
American 6505 -'` October 15,
$1677.94 1965
The City Manager recommended the purchase of a 1966 Chevrolet II, stating that
depreciation on the 1965 car likely will be more than the $222 saving vbich the
City could obtain by accepting the bid of a 1965 Rambler American. Mayor Nee
stated that he believes the City would drive the compact car until its value
would be relatively woxtbless and the difference in depreciation would never
be gained for the City.
Motion by Kirkham to award the contract for purchase of a compact car to
Central Rambler Sales, 2628 Central Avenue Northeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
in the amount of $1,677.94. Seconded by Thompson. Upm a voice vote, there
being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
BUILDING PE RMIT - 6001 6005 UNIVERSITY AVENUE Na<tTiS;AB? - MASCHLAFAVAY_
Notion by Sheridan to table the request of Mr. Msrchiafava for a Building Permit
to repair his property at 6001 /6005 University Avenue Northeast. Seconded by
Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nags, the motion carried unanimously.
I�itNU1ES OF 1014%65 PAGE 17
• BU WING PERMIT AND VARUNCE - 616 RICE CREEK TERRACE - SEIGRM:
lotion by Wright to approve the request of Mr. Seigrist for a Building Permit
and grant a Variance of the side yard requirement from 5 feet to 4 feet to
permit construction of an attached garage upon his property at 616 Rice Creek
Terrace. Seconded by Kirkham, Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the
motion carried unanimously.
BUILDING PSUMIT AND VABIANCB 565 - 57TH AVMW NORTHEAST - ERICKSON;
Councilman Sheridan stated that he ezemined the property of Mr. Erickson and
that the west wall of Mr. Erickson's house was damaged by the storm and
required rebuilding. He stated that Mr. Erickson is requesting a Building
Permit for construction of a carport and needs a variance to extend the
construction to within 3 feet of the side yard lot line.
Motion by Wright to grant the request of Mr. Robert Erickson for a Building
Perarit to repair his home and construct a carport upon his property at
565- 57th Avenue Northeast, and grant his request for a waiver of the side
yard variance from five feet to three feet to permit construction of the
carport. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the
motion carried unanimously.
BU=NG PMMT AM VARIANCE - 953 -68TH AVE= MORTIMAST - WAGNERs
lh. Wagner was present at the Council Meeting and requested the Council to
grant a Building Permit to him to reconstruct hie home upon his property at
953 - 68th Avenue Northeast. He stated that he wishes to build a larger
attached garage upon his property and requested a variance to within four
fact of his side yard lot line. Mr. Wagner stated that he could not locate
his next door neighbor to obtain his agreement to the variance.
Notion by Thompson to grant the request of Mr. Wagner for a Building Permit
to reconstruct his property at 953 - 68th Avenue Northeast and grant his
request for a waiver of the side yard requirement frown five feet to four feet
to permit construction of an attached garage. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
PLANNING CM4USS�ION MEBTiriG MINUTES - SEP'TEM'BER 23, 1965:
REZONING OUTIAP 1. MCLWY MANOR 4TH AUDITION. it M R -1 T8 C -1 %G& #65-M.
M. T. B. TBS s
The City Manager read the motion of the Planning Co maiesion recommending
approval of the request of Dr. T. H. Lester to rezone 0ntlot #1, Melody Manor
4th Addition.
Motion by Kirkham to concur with the Planning Commission and order a Public
Hearing for the date of November 1, 1965 for the rezoning re"at of
Dr. T. H. Lester to rezone Outlot #1, Melody Manor 4th Addition from R -1
(Single family welling) to CR -1 (offices and office buildings for medical,
idental, optical clinics, apothecary shops, harmless and inoffensive
laboratories, accessory to permitted uses in the same building). Seconded
by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nay*, the motion carried
unanimously.
MV1UTES OF 10/4/65 PAGE 18
• PARKS AND 13AYtR003 F M = SUPE8ENTENDMITI
Mayor Nee asked the City Manager whether there would be enough money in
the budget to hire a full time park superintendent in April, May or June.
The City Manager stated that it would be necessary to have a park superin-
tendent in the winter to order to maintain the skating rinks. Councilman
Kirkham stated that he does not believe the City can afford a full time
parks attendant at this time. Councilman Wright stated that he believes the
City should hire a full time attendant at this time and Mayor New asked the
City Manager whether it would be possible for the Parks and Playgrounds Sub -
Committee and the Recreation Commission to change the budget in order to
furnish the necessary funds to hire a full time park superintendent.
Councilman Wright suggested that when the Parks and Playgrounds Sub- Comsittes
and the Recreation Com- isstonare merged, the budget can be amended to take
some of the money for recreation personnel and use it to pay a full time
park superintendent.
Motion, by Kirkham to receive and file the remainder of the minutes of the
Planning Commission. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, Kirkham,
Wright, Thompson voting yea, Nee and Sheridan voting nay, the motion
carried.
EMM—Y HWR G AND MMMLpRVNT AUTHORITY MNEMG MINUTES SEPTA 15 1965:
Notion by Kirkham to receive and -file the minutes of the Fridley Housing
and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of September 15, 1965. Seconded by
• Wright. Upon a voice vote, theret being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
FSiDLEY HODS G AND NMMZ&RftVXT ADT@txtlTY MBBTING MIN1iT88 SSPWffi8R 22 1965
Notion by Kirkham to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Sousing
and Redevelopmment Authority Meeting of Septae►bas 22, 1965. Seconded by
Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
•__U
OWN: - �$ CIX" AMSMTS
Councilman Sheridan asked the Finance Director vben the assessment was levied
against the property. The Finance Director anowered, "In 1962." Coonailma,
Sheridan asked whether the property owner made any objections to the assessment
at the assessment bearing. The Finance Director answered, "No, not to ape
knowledge." Councilman Sheridan stated that the property owner has a larger
lot than most other property owners in the City, that the lot apparently
cannot be split and be does not know what the City can do to abate a portion
of the assessments for the property owner.
Notion by Sheridan to receive the comeunication from Mr. and Mrs. Sampson.
Seconded by Wright. Upon a votes vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
• CIAX.mt
Motion by Wright to approve General and Public Utilities Claims #6524 through
#6773. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the
motion carried unanimously.
0
0
0
MINUISS OF 10/4/65
PAGE 19
Notion by Kirkhem to approve Liquor Claims #7857 through 7892. Seconded by
Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unantmouslq.
Motion by Wright to approve the following estimates---.
Karl Dedolph Construction Cospany
771 West Seventh Street
St. Yawl, Minnesota
Estimate #3 - Water improvement Project
No. 75-B (Booster Station - 63rd Avenge N.S.
& T.B. #65) (Partial) 2,670.75
Cowtock & Davis, Inc.
Consulting Engineers For: Furnishing of professional Sngi+mseriteg
1446 County Road "J" Services for Planning:
Hinnespolis, viamesota, 55432
SstI=tn #2 - Storm Sevsr Wrovaaeat Project
No. 11 (Te H. #479 north of ilississippi Street)
and Sanitary Sewer Improve®ent Project No. 72
(7.B. #47, north of Mississippi Street)
C. Se Macrossan, -Incogwrated'
Route #2, Boat 322
Osseo, Minnesota
Estimate #4 - Street ImprovOWInt Project
No, St. 1965 -1 (1965 H micipal Program) (Partial)
Estimate #4 - Street Improvewmt Project
No. 1965 -2 (1965 State Aid Program) (Partial)
$ 645.24
$ 10,384.18
$ 36,176.99
Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no asys, the notion
carried unanimously.
!lotion by Thwpxm to approve the following estimtess
PAYMENTS TO DRD3I8 CUM UP CO-H—T ACTOBS
INVOUX
...-..
.r. 1M
1207 Carlson- Laft". Inc.
36702 Truck Crave Service Co.
36703 Track Crane Service Co.
Walter R. FreemrR
Walter R. Freeman
crane v /operator
Tractor v /operator
30 Ton Truck Carona
Rubber tired Loader
Tractor & Trailer Damp
Tractor & Trailer Dwe
BG 9 Cat Loader
HG 9 Cat Loader
$2,676.61
$2,067.75
$ 146.86
$1,23+.00
ToTAL 6 1.24
•
•
HINU ZS OF 10/4/65
PAGE 20
Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
Motion by Kirkham to approve the claim of the Fridley American Legion Post
#303 in the amount of $120.00 for covering open basement doorways of tornado
damaged homes. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,
the notion carried unnalmously.
C RIZI.
Motion by Sheridan to approve the folloning license applicationst
North Side Electric Cong aaey
1109 Nest Brody
apolis, Minnesota bys J. E. Stumpfa
W MUMS
S
Ace Heating ComPo4
8000 Clinton Aveenes South
81oe 11 gtou 20, Minnesota by: Erie B. 8a11snd
.+�r.V�l .LOY i\l
Adams Construction Ca■pMy, Zoe.
2637 Girard Avenue South
Mi11 -1- polis 8, HIM"Weta bye George M. Kelly
B & $ Buildare
5727 IS= Avamee North
Brooklyn Caster, Minnesota byt. James Bauman
Bremany Brothers Construction Co.
1011 - 3rd Street N. Z.
Fridley, Minnesota
A. A. Hardy & Associates, Inc.
8417 21v6svI0w Lams
1Sianespolis 30, Minnesota
J. & J. Associates, Inc.
9309 Lyndale Avenue South
Minneapolis, Mi U"Ota
Garth Jansen Company
1385 Selby Avenue
St. Paul 4, Minnesota
•
Relay P. Korman
1028 - 37th Avenue N.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Kenneth J. Platt
7001 West Old Shakopee Road
Minneapolis 31, Minnesota
by: Roger C. Brensy
by: R. E. Samdin
byt Jeffred W. Leighton
by-. Garth K. Jensen
by: Beary P. Korman
bys Kenneth J. Platt
NO
Nei
NOW
NAT
MW
,-I
ow
N$�1
MINITIZS OF 10/41'65
I
i Act Beating �y
8000 Clinton Avenue Suit
Bloomington 20, Klanesota
I -
c:
A�SOI�BY
Roger Sorensen construction Co.
3322 Sarsent Avenue
St. Paul 5, Minnesota
Carlson PbMbisg company
10143 - 3rd Avenue South
Solis 208, Minnesota
8. B. Stoats Plambftg Company
2101 West 67th Street
Richfield, x1mnesota
SIGNNAMNG
Signcraft,+sre Outdoor Display Co.
836 • 4m1h Avenue N. E.
mwmwpo is 219 Minnesota
PAGZ 21
by: Eric B. Holland dAL
by: Roger Sorensen SEN
by: Leslie T. Cartoon
by: B. B. Stun L
by: James J. Stafford
Jack J. Laurawo NSW
Name and Address Address of Apt. Bldg.
Gloria Scbleiss
5800 - 4th Street N.E.
Tridley, Minnesota 5800 - 4th Street No E.
James b Janet Rudnitski
6035 Main Street N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 6035 Main Street No E.
CIC RiTtB ....m
Les Standard Service Station
Say. #63 & Osborne Road N.S.
Fridley, Minnesota
Los Standard Service Station
My. $65 & Osborne Road R.E.
Fsidley, Himesota
APT. m___n Fm
4 $10.00
by: Lester Sehaffraa
by: Lester Sebsffran
rA
W
$10.00
mm
MINUTES OF 10/4165
PAGE ;2
• Seconded by Wright. upon a voice vote, there being no mays, the motion carried
GUAM sly.
ESTTIMATB - SMIXY A ASSOCIATES - BLUEPRINTING AND REPRODUCTION:
The City Manager stated that he has not received an itemised bill from Smiley
and Associates.
Motion by Wright to table consideration of the estimate of Smiley and Associates
for blueprinting and reproduction expenses. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice
vote, there being no nsys, the motion carried unanimously.
AUNT - MaNI>SAPOLIS GAS COMPANY:
lotion by Wright to authorise the City Manager and the City Attorney to write
an agreement with the Minneapolis Gas Company to protect the City ®s interests and
to grant a permit upon the request of the Minneapolis Gas Company for an extension
of services at 77th Way Northeast and let Street Northeast. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
TENNIS COURTS.: .240088 LARE , BEACH:
Councilman Wright stated that the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee is eager to
have the construction of the teems courts on Moore Lake Beach completed and
this amount has been included in the 1965 budget. The City Manager stated
• that if the Council desired to have the City advertise for bids, the City can
encumber the funds in the 1965 budget.
Motion by Wright that the City advertise for bids for construction of tennis
courts on Moore Lake Beach. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nay *, the motion carried unanimously.
sUPPtBirBNTAi. AGREEMENT - FRIDLEY - COLUMSI,A HEIGHTS.- SS#12;
rrw� r— em.r.� rrw a�rnr..rw — +rae�rrir r.
The City Attorney stated that Columbia Heights was going to consider this
agreement on the previous Friday but he had no word concerning the action
taken by Columbia Heights. He suggested that action on the supplemental agree-
ment be tabled to the regular Council Meeting of October 18, 1%5.
Motion by Thompson to table to the regular Council Meeting of October 18, 1965
consideration of the supplemental agreement between Fridley and Columbia
Heights for maintenance of storm sewer project #12. Seconded by Wright. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
AtBHSB 9NT - FRIDLEY - COLUMBIA HEIGHTS - ESCROW FWS. 38#12 e
The City Attorney stated that he would suggest this matter be tabled to the
regular Council Meeting of October 18, 1965 since he did not know what action
the City of Columbia Heights has taken: on this agreement.
• Motion by Thompson to table to the regular Council Meeting of October 18, 1965
consideration of an agreement for escrow of funds for Storm Sewer Project #12.
Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
Unanimously.
MINUTES OF 10/6/65
• AP'POIXTNW:
PAGE 23
Motion by Sheridan to concur With the action of the City Manager and approve
the following appointment;
NAME POSITION BALMY REPLACES
Janes Blair Benedict Fuiltime Bartender $2.65 per doe
4607 Morgan Avenue North 'Bar #2 (effective hour Try"A
Minneapolis,. Minnesota 9/16/65)
Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
Ab1A001�CSId3Di ?OF.M.S.A. Gs
The City Engineer stated that 'he believes the M.S.A. Searing will concern
only minor changes in the matter of handling State Aid Funds.
Motion by Sheridan to receive the announcement of M.S.A. Hearings, and direct
the Aftinistration to represent the City at the K.S.A. Heariag. Seconded by
Writ. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously.
CHANGE ORWR #1 - ST. 1965 -2:
The City Engineer explained the purpose of the change order.
motion by Thompson to accept Change order #1 for St. 1965 -2. Seconded by
Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
CHANGE ORDSR #2 - ST. 1965 -1:
The City Engineer explained the purpose of Change order #2 for Street Construc-
tion Project 1%5 -10
Motion by Wright to accept Change Order #2 for St. 1965 -1. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously-
-1965 -
Notion by Wright to adopt Sesolation #177 -1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously.
Motion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #178- 1965. Seconded by Kirkahm. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the nation carried unanimously.
• 8ESO1iJ?ION #,9 -1965
Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #179 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon
a vote* vote, there being no nays, the action tarried unanimously.
i-
•
MINUTES CF 10/4/65
#180 -1965 -.ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT, FINAL FLANS AND
� IYw■- ®Ai�W�■ �Y ■C- iYr�■Y� Yf�� ■Y�■�■�nO ��Yr�Y ■
PAGE 24
Notion by Kirkham to adopt Resolution #180 -1965 with deletions of item A -3
"Construction of the portion of the improvement along Osborne Road ", and
note the objections to #1 -BD "Construction of the storm surer project on
Dover and Ely Streets ", by Mr, Englund, 407 Ely Street Northeast, and
Mrs Arnold, Seconded by Wright, Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,
the motion carried unanimously.
The City Engineer stated that Don Anderson wants to complete construction of
a house and services to the house in a hurry. He asked the Council whether
It would be possible to add this portion of SS&SW #73 -B to the contract for
construction of sewer and water services in Innsbruck 5th Addition. The City
Attorney asked, "What is the cost of this portion of SSWW#73 -B ?" Mr. Comstock
answered, "The cost In-approximately $18,500.00." The City Engineer stated
that if this portion of the construction were added to the contract in Innsbruck"
3th Addition, the consulting engineering firm of Comstock and Davis would do
the design work and the inspection work as they have done on other City projects.
The Council took no action upon this request;
Notion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #181 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.,
Motion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #182-1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
RES0LUT109 AUTHORIZING AMEW WITH COLUMBIA HEIGHTS - 33#12s
Notion by Wright to table to the regular Council Meeting of October 18, 1965
consideration of the Resolution Authorizing Agreement with Columbia Heights
for construction of Storm Sewer Project #12. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION # 183-1965- SETTING GENERAL ELECTION AND DESIGNATING JUDGBSs
Councilman. Kirkham asked the City Clerk whether the list of proposed election
judges for the general election is the same as that for
the primary. The City Clerk answered that this to correct except that a
• couple of names have been changed on the list of judges for the general
election who did not serve during the primary election.
Notion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #183 -1965 and authorise the City Clerk
to hire a panel of election judges out of the names presented by the City
Clark to the Council. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there boring
no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES 0P 10/4/65
• C.a* NICATI0N3
PAGE 25
Motion by Sheridan to receive the mono from the Fridley Housing and
Redevelopment Authority. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, the notion carried unanimously.
Councilman Kirkham asked the City Attorney whether it would be possible to
change the wording of the ballot for the Bond Issue. The City Attorney
answered that he wants to obtain the approval of Cbarles Howard before
changing the wording of the ballot. He stated that he does not see any
reasons why there could not be three different questions on the ballot.
The City Attorney stated further that the funds from the bond issue could
be used for improvement projects such as streets, storm sewers, and other
services in the renewal project area, and that these improvements could be
considered the City's share of funds contributed to the project. Councilman
Wright stated that he believes the ballot would be clearer if an introductory
paragraph were inserted at the top of the ballot. Councilman Kirkham stated
• that he believes the Councilman are in agreement that the ballot should be
simple so voters do not give up before they road the entire ballot. He
stated that he favors separating the ballot into the three separate projects.
The City Attorney asked the Finance Director how much time is required to
print the ballots. The Finance Director answered that absentee ballots
must be ready between seven and ten days be fore the election, and that
seven to ten days after the next Council Meeting would not be enough time
to get the ballots printed.
Councilman Sheridan stated that he believes there should be a separate ballot
for each one of the Urban Renewal Projects. The City Clerk suggested that
each ballot could have a different color. The City Attorney stated that !n
the event there are three separate ballots, he believes it would be necessary
to put a preamble on each one and use the same language on each one. Vie
City Attorney stated that he wished to have the Council approve any chimses
made in the wording of the ballot.
Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #184 -1965, to provide for a separate
ballot for each Urban Renewal Project, to amend the notice of election by
wording the preamble of each ballot as follows:
The City Council will submit to the voters of this City
at the next General Election, namely November 2, 1965,
three separate ballots on the questions of whether the
City of Fridley be authorized to issue General Obliga-
tion Bonds in connection with various housing and
redevelopment projects;
MINUTBS CP 10/4/65
PAGE 26
and that the City Clerk be directed and authorised to prepare three
ballots. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,
the motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #185w1965. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #186 -1965. Seconded by Thompson.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Thomason to adopt Resolution #187 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
Notion by Sheridan to adopt Resolution #188 -1965. Seconded by Wright.
• Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
M&LIODY MANS 3TMM SEWER TARY SEWER AND WATER VBMBNTS
The City Engineer stated that the City Engineering Staff has inspected
the impsovements in Melody Manor and found certain defects in the storm
sewer and sanitary sewer construction in Melody Manor. He stated that
repair of these defects will incur certain coats. The City Engineer
stated further that he received a request from Sandstrom and Hafner,
the contractors, to approve construction of the improvements in order
that financing can be obtained by the builders. The City Engineer
stated further that an agreement for maintenance and repair of the
improvements in Melody Manor Sub- divisions was drawn between Sandstrom
and Hafner and the City in 1961. The City Attorney read the agreement.
The City Engineer stated that normally a performance bond is required of
a contractor instead of an agreement to maintain the improvement for one
year, then if a defect is discovered in the improvement, the City can
collect upon the performance bond. Whereas, now if the developer fails
to correct defects in construction, the City °s only recourse is suaing
the developer, The City Engineer stated that there are problems with
the high water table in this area and he believes it is necessary to match
the construction for one year to ascertain whether any further defects will
occur.
• Cetmeilmen Wright asked the City Engineer whether he anticipated that there
would be more defects in the construction. The City Engineer stated that
this was possible, but that he assumes the contractor will fix these defects.
MINUTES OF 1014/65
PAGN 21
• The City Engineer stated that under terms of the 1961 agreement for
maintenance, after the one year of maintenance work by the contractor,
the City would inspect the work done and, were aseessary,require the
contractor to make satisfactory repairs before the City accepts the
improvement.
The City Attorney asked why the Contractor cannot repair these defects
In the construction at this time, and have the City furnish a letter
accepting the improvement at a later date. The City Engineer stated
that the builders need the financing fimuediately, and would have to
bring in equipment in order to effect immediate repairs. The City
Attorney stated that it would be necessary to make a binding agreement
with the contractor for repairs to the construction or the contractor
would not complete these repairs. The City Attorney stated, further,
that the agreement to maintain and repair the construction should run for
a period of one year beginning when repairs to the defects of the.present
construction are completed. The City Attorney stated that it should be
clear in the agreement when the agreement to maintain and repair the
construction for one year takes effect, i.e., upon what date the year
begins.
Motion by Wright to authorise the AdminlWation to issue a letter stating
that the storm sower, sanitary sewer, and water construction projects in
Melody Manor 3rd and 4th Additions are acceptable, to require the
contractor to execute a maintenance agreement for performance of
. maintenance after the repairs in the prevent cmatruction are completed,
and to inform the contractor that issuance of a letter accepting the
improvement to conditioned upon hie agreement with these terms. Seconded
by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
31 FWT STREET WIDTHS IN =;MUCK 5TH ADDI CH:
The City Engineer asked the City Council to fix the width of streets in
Innsbruck 5th Addition. He stated that the present streets in Innsbruck
5th Addition are of concrete construction and are 31 feet wide. the stated
that under present policy street construction in new sub - divisions is
36 feet wide unless the Council changes the street width.
Motion by Wright to permit construction of concrete streets 31 feet in
width in Innsbruck 5th Addition. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION - FRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL PARR PLANT 2s
The City Engineer stated that he has asked the contractor to install cast
iron pipe in the storm sower construction in Fridley Industrial Park Plat
2 north of the Viron building if the sub -soil conditions are bad. He
asked the Council to issue a statement of policy whether the pipes shall be
cast iron or concrete. Councilman Wright stated that he believes it to
acceptable to require up- grading of the construction where it is necessary.
The Council took no action upon this request.
MD=S OF 10/4165 pAGg 28
COUSESU. —MOK 54TH AVMM LC THSAST B$Z&& _STH_ SM=T MAID 7TH STBEBT
rrrn
Lffl STe
2he City Engineer asked whether the City should off -set 54th Avenue Northeast
between 5th Street and 7th Street Northeast in order to construct the street
around the present cemetery fence. Mayor Nee suggested that the City Engineer
draw up plans for the off -set of the street and ask the Council to approve
the plans.
Notim by Wright to approve the off -set of 54th Avenue Northeast between 5th
Street Northeast and 7th Street Northeast to the south of the right-of-way
around the fence of the cemetery owned by the Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic
Church. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the
motion carried ussnimousiy.
Councilman Kirkham stated that he mould like to request the City Manager to find
whether persons moving these duplexes into the City of Fridley had a legal
moving permit permitting them to do so, or whether a moving permit was required
by. the City of Fridley at the time these duplexes were moved into the City.
Morino by Kirkham, to instruct the Administration to investigate whether moving
permits were issued to.move the duplexes located at 5600/5602, 5606/5608, 5612/
• 5614, 5618/5620 - 6th Street Northeast into the City, whether moving permits
were required by the City, whether such permits were legally issued if required,
and whether moving these duplexes Into the City of Fridley was a legal action
at the time. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the
motion carried unanimously.
2'here being no further business Mayor Nam declared the regular Council Meeting
of October 48 1965 adjourned at 2:05 A.M.
Respectfully submitted;
Rg"Md S. Bade
Secretory to the Council
0
0
•
OFFICIAL IIOTICE .
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE TEfE
CITY COUNCIL
TO WWK IT 14AY CONCIRN:
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of
the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 Univer-
sity Avenue N.S. on October 180 1965 in the Council Chamber at 8:00 P.M.
for the purpose of:
Consideration of a request by Carlson & LoVine,
Incorporated to rezone from C -2S (general shopping
areas) and M -1 (light industrial areas) to R -3A
(multiple family dwellings) that part of the Nest
1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, and that
part of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section
15, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota
or that part of Lots 16 through 27, Block 9, Lowell
Addition to Fridley Park and part of vacated alley
in said Block 9, and that part of Lots 22 through
27, Block 8 in said Addition and part of vacated
Main Street, described ac follows: Beginning at
the Southwest corner of Sylvan Hills Plat 6; thence j
Test along the North line of Mercury Drive ss'
platted in Sylvan Hills Plat 3, a distance of 350
feet; thence North parallel with the West line of
Sylvan Hills Plat 6, a distance of 235.3 feet;
thence East to its intersection with the West line
of said Sylvan Hills Plat 6, said intersection
being 235 feet North of said Southwest corner of
Sylvan Hills Plat 6; thence South along said West
line to the point of beginning.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above
matter will be heard at this meeting.
WILLIAM J. NEE
MAYOR
• Publish: October 13, 1965
0C
a,,.
ORDINANCE NO.
• AN ORD114ME TO 94EITD TIM CITY COME OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING
DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SBCTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as
hereinafter indicated.
SEM014 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City
of Fridley.and described as:
That part of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section
141, and that part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 15, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota
or that part of Lots 16 through 27, Block 9, Lovell Addition
to Fridley Park and part of vacated alley in said Block 9,
and that part of Lots 22 through 27, Block 8 in said Addi-
tion and part of vacated Hain Street, described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Sylvan Bills Plat 6;
thence West along the North line of 11arcury Drive as
platted in Sylvan Hills Plat 3, a distance of 350 feet;
thence North parallel with the West line of Sylvan Hills
Plat 6, a distance of 235.3 feet; thence East to its
intersection with the West line of said Sylvan Hills
Plat 6, said intersection being 235 feet Borth of said
Southwest corner of Sylvan Hills Plat 6; thence South
along said West line to the point of beginning
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known
as R -3A (multiple family dwellings).
SWT1O14 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the
official zoning map to show said tract or area Prow zoned
district Ca2S (general shopping area) and M -1 (light
industrial area) to R -3A (multiple family dwellings).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS AIRY
OF , 1965.
MAYOR William J. 11,06
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell
Public Bearing:
SFirst Reading:
Second Reading:
Publish.......:
• OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIMEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is bereby given that there will be a Public Hearing
of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431
University Avenue N.E. on October 18, 1965 in the Council Chamber
at 8 :00 o'clock P.M. for the purpose of:
Consideration of the final plat of Carlson
& LaVine, Incorporated P.S. #65-01) Sylvan
Hills Plat 8 being that part of the West 1/2
of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, and that
part of the Bast 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of
Section 15, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota or that part of Lots 16 through 27,
• Block 9, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park and part
of vacated alley in said Block 9, and that part
of Lots 22 through 27, Block 8 in said Addition
and part of vacated Main Street, described as
follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of
Sylvan Hills Plat 6; thence West along the
North line of Mercury Drive as platted in Sylvan
Hills Plat 3, a distance of 350 feet; thence
North parallel with the West line of Sylvan
Hills Plat 6, a distance of 235.3 feet; thence
East to its intersection with the West line of
said Sylvan Hills Plat 6, said intersection being
235 feet North of said Southwest corner of Sylvan
Hills Plat 6; thence South along said West line
to the point of beginning.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above
matter will be heard at this meeting.
WILLIAM J. NEE
MAYOR
Publish: October 13, 1965
0
31
6''
'2 . \ -
RESOLUTION #
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER OF THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY TO ENTER INTO A WRITTEN AGREEMENT OR
AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS AND CONCERN-
ING THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM ACROSS TRUNK HIGHWAY #47 AND
THE 45TH,AVENUE OUT -FALL OF SAID STORM SEWER.
WHEREAS, the administrative staff of the City of Fridley, together
with the staff of the City of Columbia Heights have prepared a written agree-
ment together with a supplemental agreement concerning the expenditure, con- .
struction, and maintenance of the storm sewer project running from Columbia
Heights through the City of Fridley, across Trunk Highway #47, and utilizing
an out -fall on 45th Avenue;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City of Fridley enter into
said agreement and supplemental agreement with the City of Columbia Heights
and involving the construction, financing and maintenance arid-:repair of the
storm sewer project used by the two cities and running across'Trunk Highway
#47 to the 45th Avenue out -fall. '
ORDINANCE #
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR,
ALTERATION, LOCATION OR MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS
WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, PROVIDING FOR THE POSTING OF
BONDS: THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND FEES THEREFOR, THE
REVOCATION OF PERMITS: INSPECTION AND FEES THEREFOR:
PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF: AND FOR REPEALING
CITY CODE SECTION 45.06 SUBD. 8 AND ENACTING CHAPTER 56.
The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows
1. There is hereby enacted a new Chapter of the City Code of Fridley
as follows:
56. SIGN REGULATIONS
56.01 This ordinance shall hereafter be known and cited as the
"Sign Regulations ".
56.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this ordinance unless the context
otherwise indicates:
• (1) SIGN. The Term "Sign" shall mean a name, identification, des-
cription, display, illustration, structure or device which is affixed to, or
painted, or represented directly or indirectly upon a building or other outdoor
surface or piece of land, and which directs attention to an object, product,
place, activity, person, institution, organization or business.
(2) SIGN, AUTOMOBILE SERVICE. The Term "Automobile Service Sign"
means any sign that does not exceed 32 square feet directing the motorist
travelling along the highway to a place or places catering to motoring needs.
These include: Auto laundry, eating establishment, motels, motor hotels,
refreshment drive -ins, public garages, parking areas, repair garages, service
stations, drive -in theatres, and amusements parks.
(3) SIGN, BILLBOARD. The term "Billboard" means any sign erected,
• constructed, or maintained for the purpose of outdoor advertising, whether such
sign is independently supported or placed upon the ground, roof or wall of any
building, and the advertisement thereon does not relate to commodities
q3
Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 2
• being sold or the business being conducted upon the premises.
(4) SIGNS BUSINESS. The term "Business Sign" shall mean any
sign which directs attention to a business or profession or to the primary
commodity, service or entertainment sold or offered upon the premises where
such sign is located or to which it is attached..
(5) SIGN, FLASBING. The term "Flashing Sign" shall mean any
illuminated sign on which the artificial light is not maintained both sta-
tionary and constant in intensity and colar at all times when such a sign is
in use.
(6) SIGN, IDENTIFICATION. The term "Identification Sign" shall
mean any sign identifying a resident, school, church or other non - business use.
(7) SIGN, ILLUMINATED. The term "Illuminated Sign" shall mean
• any sign which has characters, letters, figures, design or outline illumin-
ated by electric lights or luminous tubes as a part of the sign proper.
(8) SIGN, TEMPORARY. The term "Temporary Sign" shall mean any
sign not over 40 square feet in industrial areas or 15 square feet in all
other areas which is not permanently affixed to the ground or a building.
Section 56.03 FEES. Permit fees for signs shall be;
(1) For signs 40 square feet or less an initial fee of $10.00
and an annual charge of $5.00 for an inspection of such sign.
The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly
on a building, which advertises products sold or services provided in that
building.
(2) For signs larger than 40 squre feet the initial fee shall
be $25.00 plus 25 cents per square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100
• square feet. The annual inspection fee shall be $12.50 plus 10 cents per
square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 square feet.
Ordinance - Signs, Billboards
Page 3
The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly
on a building, which advertises products sold or services provided in that
building.
(3) Nb fees are required for the non - permit signs provided
for in Section 56.06 and may be waived for religious, civic, school and
public interests by a majority vote of the City Council.
Section 56.04 PERMIT APPLICATION. Application for permits
shall be made upon blanks provided by the Building Inspector and shall state
or have attached thereto, the following information:
(1) Name, address and telephone number of applicant.
(2) Location of building, structure, or lot to which or upon
which the sign is to be attached or erected.
0 (3) Position of the sign or other advertising structures in
relation to nearest buildings, structures, public streets or rights of way.
The drawing showing such position shall be prepared "in scale."
(4) Two blue prints or ink drawings of the plans and
specifications and method of construction or attachment to the building
or in the ground including all dimensions. Locating all light sources,
wattage, type and color of lights, and details of any light shields or shades.
(5) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structure
is designed for dead load and wind velocity in the amount required by this
and all other ordinances of the City.
(6) Name of person, firm, corporation, or association erecting
structure.
• (7) Written consent of the owner of any land on which the
structure is to be erected.
(8) Any electrical permit required for any sign.
(9) AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY:
(a) Which would authorize and direct the City of
• Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 4
Fridley to remove and dispose of any signs and sign structure on which
a permit has been issued but which was not renewed, if the owner does
not remove the same within a 30 day period following the expiration df
the permit.
(b) Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley
to remove the sign and sign structure, at the expense of the applicant,
where maintenance is required and the maintenance is not furnished, but
only after a hearing and after a notice of 60 days specifying the
maintenance required by the City.
(10) Such other information as the Building Inspector may
require.
0 Section 56.05 LICENSES AND BONDS. No person, firm, or
corporation shall engage in the business of erecting signs, nor shall he
be entitled to a permit to erect a sign under this ordinance unless licensed
to do so by the City Council. Such license may be granted by the City
Council after written application to the City Clerk, accompanied by an
annual license fee of $25.00 and it may be terminated at any time for cause.
The license shall expire on December 31st in the year of issuance and each
year thereafter. No license shall take effect until the licenses shall
file with the City Clerk a corporate surety bond in the sum of $1,000.00
conditioned that the licenses shall make proper application for all sign
work, pay necessary permit fees, conform to all the provisions of this
Chapter and indemnify and hold the City, its officers and agents, harmless
• from any damage or claim resulting from or related to the erection or
maintenance of any sign in the City by the licensee.
Section 56.06 PERMITS. It shall be unlawful to keep, install,
construct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct, or move any outdoor sign
37
Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 5
or sign structure within the City o CFridley without first obtairri4% a
permit therefor., except the following:
(1)' A sign not exceeding 15 square feet in area pertaining
only to the sale, rental, or lease of the premises upon which displayed.
(2) An identification sign, not exceeding 4 square feet in area.
.(3) A business sign not exceeding 10 feet in area, which sign
is placed on non - public property.
(4) A temporary political sign in regard to a candidate or
an election.
(5) A temporary sign erected by a religious, eleemosynary,
• charitable, benevolent, educational, public or civic interest, provided
that each such sign shall bear the name and address of the responsible
owner and shall be removed within 15 days after the date to which the
temporary sign has relevance.
All permits and the annual fees therefor shall expire April 30th
of each year and must be renewed prior to that date.
Section 56.07 GENERAL REGULATIONS. No sign shall be erected
or painted in the City of Fridley unless it shall conform to and meet these
regulations:
(1) No sign shall be installed, which by reason of position,
shape or color would conflict with the proper functioning or interpretation
of any traffic sign or signal.
(2) There shall be no flashing signs in the front setback
. within 150 feet of a street intersection.
• Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 6
Lighted revolving signs shall be permitted within this,area
but the bottom of the sign surface shall be a minimum of fourteen feet
above the street grade at that point.
(3) Except for grand openings and holidays, banners and
streamers may not be used.
(4) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers
or similar devices that would so distract automobile traffic as to
-- - - constitute a safety hazard.
38
(5) Except in Industrial Districts, signs shall not be painted
directly to any exterior building surface but shall be on a separate frame
except for temporary display windows. Sign letters, symbols may be
• attached directly to a wall by adhesive or mechanical means.
(6) Temporary signs advertising buildings for rent and for
sale may be placed in the yard of such building providing such signs are
not closer than 10 feet to any property line and do not exceed 40 square
feet in industrial areas and 15 square feet in other areas.
• (7) Signs not otherwise allowed advertising new housing
developments of more than 30 building sites and located in Fridley may
be constructed in any district, providing: Any one sign is not over
600 square feet; the signs are located at least 300 feet from any pre-
existing home and 1,000' from any sign advertising the same development
and the signs are removed when the particular project is 95% sold out.
(8) Except for grand openings and temporary signs less
than 6 square feet, there shall be no temporary signs in any required
• setback area. There shall be no more than three such signs on any parcel
and the total sign area shall not exceed 18 square feet.
3If
Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 7
(9) All temporary signs shall comply immediately with these
• performance standards upon the date this Chapter goes into effect.
(10) No signs shall overhang the public right -of -way.
(11) Directional signs not located on the premises of use in
question may not be located in any district except by special permit.
(12) The illumination of any sign located within 500 feet of any
residential district lot line shall be diffused or indirect, non - flashing,
and designed so as not to reflect rays of light into adjacent residences.
(13) TEMPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS. Temporary political signs
shall be removed by the person or persons placing such signs within 15 days
after the election for which they are applicable. Each such sign shall show
the name and address, printed or indelible ink, of the person responsible
;for the placing of the sign, who shall be deemed prima facia the person who
i
placed the sign and is responsible for its removal. No person shall deface
or remove a temporary political sign, prior to 24 hours following the
election, except with the consent and knowledge of the person responsible
for the placing of the sign.
(14) All signs shall be maintained in good condition and
the areas around them kept free from debris, bushes, high weeds, and
from anything else which would be an eyesore or nuisance. The surface
of all signs must be repainted at least once every two (2) years or
whenever necessary as determined by inspection to prevent the sign
surface from becoming unkempt in appearance. When any sign is removed,
the building inspector shall be notified and the entire surrounding
area shall be cleared of all debris and unsightly projections and
protrusions.
(15) In multiple unit dwellings one identification or
business sign not exceeding 12 square feet shall be permitted for
40
• Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 8
each dwelling group of 6 to 12 units. One identification or business
sign not exceeding 40 square feet shall be permitted for each dwelling
group of 12 or more units.
(16) The permit owner and the licensee shall each separately
and jointly be responsible for all of the requirements of this Chapter,
including the liability for expense of removal and maintenance incurred
by the City.
Section 56.08 SIGN REQUIREMENT BY LAND USE. If they conform
to and meet the General Regulations, the following signs may be erected
or maintained as shown for each district. No other signs shall be
erected; except that temporary political signs, may be erected in any
• district.
(1) R -1, R -2 and R -3 DISTRICTS.
a. Type - Identification and Business Signs only.
b. Number - One only on any lot.
c. Size - Not more than 12 square feet, except as
provided for in 56.07 (15).
d. Maximun height`- Not more than 4 feet above
street grade.
e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign
in residential district shall be set back a minimum
of 10 feet from any property line.
f. Illumination - Not permitted.
(2) C -1 and C -IS DISTRICTS.
• a. Type - Identification, Business and Automobile
Service Signs.
b. Number - One per principal entrance or per building.
u
Ordinance - Signs, Billboards
` 41
Page 9
c. Size - The gross surface area of all permitted signs
on a lot or parcel shall not exceed the sum of 4 square feet per front
foot of building.
d. Height - No more than 4 feet above outside wall closest
to the sign.
e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any
sign may project only two feet into setback from building.
f. Illumination - Illuminated but non - flashing signs
permitted.
(3) C -2, C -2S and P DISTRICTS.
a. Type - Identification, Business, Automobile.Service
and Illuminated Signs permitted.
b. Number - Business Signs: One on building or one
pylon or pedestal sign per each rental or separate business unit with
frontage on thoroughfare. One additional permitted for open 100 feet
of frontage.
c. Size - No sign'shall exceed 40 square feet.
d. Height - No part of a pylon or pedestal sign shall
be less than 14 feet vertical distance above the street grade level or
more than 25 feet vertical distance above street grade level. Roof
signs may not be over 6 feet above nearest outside wall.
e. Projection - No sign shall be closer than 10 feet
from the property line.
• f. Illumination - Illuminated and flashing signs permitted
except those which are hazardous to vehicular traffic or create a
nuisance to occupants of residences in the area.
•
•
je
f
4 2
Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 10
(4) 'M -1 and M -2 DISTRICTS.
a. Types - All types permitted.
'b. Number - One per each 500 feet of street frontage.
c. Height - No ground sign over 30 feet above grade
and no roof sign more than 30 feet above the nearest outside wall.
Section 56.10 HARDSHIP WAIVER. The provisions of this chapter
may be waived wherer a strict application would bring undue hardship and
the public interest would not be seriously jeopardized after a public
hearing before the Board of Appeals and an affirmative vote of 4 members
of the City Council.
Section 56.11. Any violation of this ordinance shall constitute
a misdemeanor. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 56.12.REPEAL. Subdivision 8 of Section 45.06 and any
other portions of the Fridley City Code inconsistent with this chapter
are hereby repealed.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1965.
Attest:
Marvin Brunsell City Clerk
Hearing:
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published.....:
William J. Nee, Mayor
0
Adopted and recommended to council for passage (after review by City
Attorney) by the joint meeting of the Parks and Playgrounds Sub -
Committee and Recreation Commission, August 30, 1965.
__14ORDINANCE #
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE RELATING TO ',THE ORGANIZATION, POWER, AND AUTHOR.-,
ITY OF THE CITY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION.
The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
Section 1. That various sections of Chapter 24 of the Fridley
City Code be amended as follows:
Section 24.01 CREATION. There is hereby created a Parks and Recreation
Commission for the City of Fridley. The commission shall consist of
five Fridley residents, appointed by the City Council.
The Commission Chairman shall be appointed by the City Council and
shall also serve as a member of the Planning Commission.
The initial members shall be appointed for staggered terms, so that the
term of no more than one would conclude in any year. Thereafter, the
members shall be appointed for terms of three years. Both original and
successive appointees shall serve until their successors are appointed
and qualified.
A vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the term by the
City Council. Members of the commission shall serve without compensa-
tion and shall not be personally interested in any contracts of the
commission. They shall at the beginning of each year select a vice -
chairman and a secretary from their own number with duties in addition
to commission membership implied by these titles. A majority shall con-
stitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
Section 24.02 SCOPE. The Parks and Recreation commission shall ad-
vise the City Manager and Council on.operation of a program of parks,
playgrounds, and public recreation. If any part of the public recrea-
tion program of the community is administered directly by any public
or private agency other than the City, the commission shall have power,
to make cooperative agreements with any such public or private agency
for the purpose of coordinating all the activities and facilities in-
cluded in such public recreation program. The commission may make use
of public property assigned to,'or of private property leased or other-
wise made available for public recreational use. Upon recommendation
of the commission, the Council shall determine what land is to be ac-
quired for recreational purposes, what land the commission shall be
permitted to use in carrying on its recreational program-, and what build-
ings or other permanent structures are to be constructed upon such land.
The commission shall advise the Council upon such matters and shall
organize and review the operation of facilities made available to it
4t
,p
for recreational purposes, but it shall have no authority to acquire
land in its own name or without the consent of the governmental unit in
whose name such land is to be acquired.
Section 24.03 POWER. In order to carry on responsibilities provided
herein, the commission shall have power to:
(a) Adopt rules for its meetings and the transaction of its
business and rules governing the use by the public of the recreation
facilities under its control.
(b) Consent and approve appointment by the Parks and Recrea-
tion Director of personnel necessary to carry lout the responsibilities
of the commission. ,
(c) Accept gifts of real and personal property for public
recreational purposes, subject to the provisions of Section 24.02.
(d) Provide for maintenance and care of public property
which has been assigned to it for public recreational purposes.
(e) Perform whatever other acts are reasonable and necessary
and proper to carry out the commission's responsibilities under this
• ordinance.
Section 24.04 PROGRAM. The commission shall each year prior to
September 1, prepare a comprehensive program for parks improvement and
acquisition and for public recreation activities for the ensuing year.
The commission's program shall be described in terms of activities as
well as finances. The budget of finances shall show:
(a) Estimated revenues, divided as follows:
(1) Amount appropriated by City Council
(2) Contributions frpm private sources
(3) Earnings from admissions and other charges
made for use of facilities
(4) Miscellaneous revenues; and
(b) Estimated expenditures, divided as follows:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4).
(5)
(6)
(7)
• (9)
(10)
(11)
Administration payroll
Instructional and supervisory payroll
Maintenance and improvement payroll
Supplies
Printing
Postage, express freight, utility charges
Repairs
Rents
Equipment
Real estate and improvements
Miscellaneous expenditures
44
•
0
45
(12) Contractual services
(13) Taxes and assessments
(14) Consultant fees.
Such budget shall,be submitted not later than June 1, to the City Manager.
The final decisions as to these contributions shall be reported back
to the commission, which shall adjust the budget, if nessary. The ex-
penditure allowances, as finally approved by the commission and City
Council, shall control the year's spending program. The commission
shall not itself levy taxes or borrow money; and it shall not approve
any claims or incur any obligations for expenditure.
Section 24.05 FUNDS. For the
tion program authorized by this
responsibility of the treasurer
authorized to establish charges
facilities or to make any phase
partially self- sustaining. Any
of collection shall be bonded.
purpose of financing the parks and recrea-
chapter, the accounting shall be the
of the City. The commission shall be
or fees for the restricted use of any
of the recreation program wholly or
employees who handle cash in the process
Section 24.06 REPORTS. In matters relating to the recreation program,
personnel and finances, advisory reports shall be made directly to the
'City Council through the City Manager.
Matters relating to property purchases, capital improvements
and facilities shall be reported to the City Council with recommendation
of the Planning Commission.
Section 24.07 ANNUAL REPORT. The commission shall, as soon as possible
after the end of each calendar year, present to the City Council, a
comprehensive annual report of its activities.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Fridley this
day of 1965.
ATTEST:
Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk
First Reading: October 4, 1965
Second Reading:
Published:
William J. Nee, Mayor . '
COMS`IOCK & DAVIS, INC.
• Consulting, Engineers
1446 County Road "J"
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
October 1, 1965
Honorable Mayor & City Council
c/o Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue, N.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota'55421
Gentlemen:
RE: REVIEW OF BIDS ON WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 75 -C, SCHEDULE 1
We have reviewed the bids received at 12:00 Noon on October 11, 1965 for
construction of Water Improvement Project 75 -C, Schedule 1, the 3 MG
Reservoir. A tabulation of the bids received is attached hereto for your
consideration. The lowest bids in order are as follows:
1. Peterson- Templin, Inc. $177,421.00
6402 Bass Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
• 2. Dory Builders, Inc. $181,600.00
5440 Douglas Drive
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55429
3. Gunnar I. Johnson & Son, Inc. $182,300.00
9320 James Avenue, So.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431
The work on this project was shown as part of item number IV-A in our
letter to the Council of December 17, 1964. The estimated construction
cost for this portion of the work was $185,000.00. It is apparent the low
bid is below the estimate.
We recommend that the project be awarded to the low bidder, Peterson - Templin,
Inc.,for the sum of $177,421.00.
Very truly yours,
COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC.
By L /- " oz-o�o
DeWayne Cehllson, P. E.
• DCO /cb
Attachment
E
i
WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 75 -C
(SCHEDULE 1)
3 MG RESERVOIR
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
BID OPENING ON OCTOBER 11. 1965 AT 12:00 NOON
ty&
POLDER
BID SURETY
LUMP SUM BID
COMPLETION TIME
f
Actors Construction Co., Inc.
U.S. F & G
$188,737.00
200 Days
1571 West County Road "C"
5% Bid Bond
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420
Nagney Ca struction Co.
Aetna Casualty
$207,280.00
Sept. 1, 1966
20 Shady Oak Road
5% Bid Bond
Hopkins, Minnesota
Peterson- `remplin, Inc.
Transamerica
$177,421.00
Sept. 1, 1966
6402 Bass Lake Road
5% Bid Bond
neapolie, Minnesota 55428
Walter D. Giertsen Co.
Planet Ins. Co.
$230,764.00
318 Days
3501 %enwood
5% Bid Bond
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Watson Construction Co.
Planet Ins. Co.
$190.000.00
320 Days
500 Loring Bldg. -1409 Willow St.
52 Bid Bond
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
C. S. McCrossan, Inc.
No Bid
R.R. 2 Box 322
Osseo, Minnesota
Monette Construction Co.
United Pacific
$187.773.00
150 Days
2050 Whine Bear Avenue
52 Bid Bond
St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
yprake Construction Co.
6311
U. S. F & G
$199,750.00
150 Days
Wayzata Boulevard
5% Bid Bond
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416
Dory Builders, Inc.
Agricultural Ins. Co
$181,600.00
320 Days
5440 Douglas Drive
52 Bid Bond
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55429
I
� t �
0
WATERIIMP%,, V`a ENT 'PROJECT 75 -C
(SCHEDULE I)
3 MG RESERVOIR
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
BID OPENING ON OCTOBER i_ 1. 1955AT 12;00 LOON
PAGE 2
47
PLAWOLDER
BID SURETY
LUMP SUM BID
COMPLETION TIME
Gunner 1. Johnson & Son, Inc.
9320 James Avenue, So,
Minnfmpolis, Minnesota 55431
St. Paul F & M
S% Bid Bond
$182,300.00
300 Days
•
�
.44 4
44 (
E
"4
W
-A
W
E
F� a -A
-nqA yy�
W^ p
A� 0. 1
44
0/��
0.
vr4
C/O�I
W
a
4d
O
O
n
p`
w i
to
w
Nh
w
�
w
'yq
i
N
v7
co
00
a
O
O
n
m
c
�
�
u
cn
O
-
9�-!
fA .
N
P4
O
Ln
�1
O
e
•
•
o
O
C14
05
N
cn
00
e-i
O
cr
O
Q
w
w
It
Ln
Q
Ci
p
-r4
a
O
c ;
- rt
tt1
41
v�l
ird
PQ
A f
ro
O
�
0
l
� •LM
w
so.
� {
w
Ei
z
'A E+
Ln to
Z
r
rn
.
tn
•
i
.i
b
U 0
ol
en
w 10 0
e
04
to
i O
Ci
04
'4°
d
3 8
qp
w
'�yyu+ �+
i
Z FA
a�
ry
Yo 0��d
C� t3 .
U
i�
c+a
e,1
-�
0
O N O
iV 0 W
w
N vi
d
92
• a
C�
6i
!!
u
6%
cn cn w
as
z
.a
-,F,'
O e-i w
$4 10
6d ca
ai
V
V
d
J
ird
s
r-0
t.E
q C i �4 rl
0 .74
64 /6' V-i
0
P4
•96 t°4
i1
aj
js
0
+� 00
Ci ems
W %0�
o�� w
C_A 4 0
L4 Ix
iIi ;zf
z
H
n
f
p
{
f
?
!
t
44
t!
1w 4.4
yi
?
a ?
rw
va
rea vs
W
a
_
®
LM.
0-4
N ara
�
•Q�
0
G2
in
� M
y
C
!
4
Ch
s
An
lz
W
in
cn
cn
co
'�
U
v;
!
O f
} i
t
O r-1
r"ii A
r•I
9
t
co
to 0%
O
Ca
n
n
<*
�o u►
n
vs vs
A
°p
co
yr
M
0o
w •er
A o
o
ca+
A
S
o%
� w
o% 0%
w w
M
-
cn
CA��
..�
�..e.r..�
...- ,�......,.
-.,.-
...- ....�_.�..�
.._.
.�.,.. -.tee..
3
'}14
Q
�
C7
cS9
A
cd �
m
JOD
RI
m
km E4
viw
NH
z
u�1U3
M
a
NuN
a3
F M
C4
40
•,
M
M
43
•ra
v
O .i
W
Q` ri
"' �
v
a
�
u
in
N
su+
W
H x W
d
a0
a
sp
�►
C'.
�.+ ae
N
d
w
m
V q 1d
ss a' �► . .
G
O
cei+ �
U A
lz
"q
1-4 3r
0°4
aD
to
ov•
P.
.12
.12
�
v a
$44 M
0
ca
z
16 r4
V4
.W CO) O
'D
� 1—s
G •
A 0
O
W CV iC
! 0'
CL
Dt 0 !d
0
0 V
�4 M is
a
4J a
v-4 A
4r,
-
cV o�
4
50
BOARD W APPEALS NOTING HEIR 8S - WMBEB 6, 1965
to
2
0
3.
•
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Nawrocki at 7 :30 P.M.
HMO= PRE81=1 Nawrocki, Fitzpatrick, Goodrich and Jankowski
MOMMS ABM=s Saunders
No one was present for or against the requested Variance.
Motion by Jankowski, seconded by Goodrich, that the Board recovm ad that the
Variance be granted. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki
declared the motion carried.
Mrs Joe Wargo was present and stated that he objected to the issuance of a special
use permit for the following reasons;
1. Does the board consider granting special use permits to people
who do not own the property in question?
2. Studies have been made by various planners concerning the best
way to develop the area surrounding the Unity Hospital.
3. If special use permits are granted to two or tore people to construct
nursing his, there probably will be no nursing hones built at all.
Mr. Bart Burkhardt, representing Winslow, Associates, stated that his firs
purchases land contingent upon getting the permits and, therefore, be thought it
was not unusual for the applicant not to be the owner of record at the time the
application is made.
Notion by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Goodrich, to refer this request for a special
use permit to construct a nursing home to the Planning Commission for its
recomimndationt. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Nonveki
declared the motion carried.
51
Z, 7,
b.
Mr. Hafner was present and stated that he plans to put in a nursing how
designed and built by a nationally recognized builder of nursing haws.
Motion by Goodrich, seconded by Fitzpatrick, to refer this request for a
special ease .perwit to construct a nursing how, to the Planning CommisSIAM
for its recomendation. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chaltuna
Nawrocki declared the notion carried.
Mr. W. Rilingo renlreslmtins Eberhardt Coikoa-ay,• stated that he felt that this
would be good for the neighborhood, that the house previ(rasly removed at
• 5820 - 3rd Street Northeast was completely sub-code and that it had been torn
dawn for that reason, and they wished to put this mmll house on the lot so
It could be sold and wrxild be a benefit to the neighboehood. Mr. Martin Dykoff
of 5810 - 3rd Street Nwrzhewt stated that he objeated because the -house would
be too close to the lot Jlx� and wpuld be LISher than his house. He advised
the Board that his hose was approl=C:21Y 90 Cleat from his 10t lime.
Kr. Richard Poa-Ju, 5824 - 3rd Street Northeaet also stated -abat he objected
because the horse would be to(% clove to US ?.VQV--qty. Hr. Bodin"s house is
to ttw north of the p-raposed stractuve and k3t. Dyl;off"s is to the south of the
V-_oopc,sed atm.cture. y.r. Bodin, cold that he zzould like to buy the property
rather than have a hmme built oa it. m,-,.. rilln-3 told Mr. Bodin that the
Eberhardt Company would be wre than happy to sell the lot to h1a.
Motion by Goadricb, secoAnded by ritzpatrielt, to cent:2--aue this Public Hearing
to Viednesday, October 13, 1965 at 7:30 P.14o Upon a voice vote, there being
no nays, Chairman Naawrocki declared Vim motiva carried'.
ADLO_UWMNTO.
There being no further business, Chairman Navroeki declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:13 P. X.
Reopectfully submitted,
V.
Earl P. Wagner
Secretary to the Board
BOARD (W APPEALS MEETING MINIMS - OCTOBER 13, 1965
Chairman Nawrocki called the meeting to order at 7 :30 P.M.
HDOM PRESENT: Jankowski, Navrocki, Fitzpatrick
MEMBERS ABSENT: Saunders, Goodrich
No one appeared in opposition to this request for a variance in
the side yard -regairerent.
Fitzpatrick moved and Jankowski seconded, that the variance be grantee'..
There being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki declared the motion carried.
• No one appeared in opposition to this request for a variance in
the front yard requirement.
Jankowski moved and Fitspatrick seconded, that the variance be
granted. There being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki declared the motion
carried.
BB MRMTT 2WANY - �CMMNU D FSM l0 f 6_ 653_,
The Chairmen announced that Eberhardt Company asked to withdraw
this request.
i..rrrrr.�T•S
The Chat adjourned the meeting at 7:38.
Respectfully submitted,
E. J. Fitspatrick
Acting Secretary to the Board
I0
52
0 /3
THS Bu Dun BoABD mmmiG MIN US OP OCTOBER , 1965
Tito meeting was called to ozdet at 7:45 P.M. by Cbaissan Sravik.
Members Present: -Rtavik, Wallace, T+onoo(Znd Wald), Hauge (1st Ward)
Members Absent s Bllis, 81skho% Herder (3rd Ward)
Mr. Geis presented the Building Board with pictures of several
piSeoa lofts of the type he plane to build.. There was a discussion
on the matter of this being a temporary building.
Notice by Wallace that the building in question, being a temporary
building, does not come under the jurisdiction of the Building
Board, and the opinion of the Building Board is not necessary
for the issuance of a permit. Seconded by Hauge. There being, no
• nays, the motion carried unsninnsly.
Mr. Boisvert vas present and showed a plan of the proposed building.
The building would be situated on the property formerly occupied by
the Block Company building. There was a discussion on the set -back,
whether it should be 100 feet or whether it should line up with the
1=ber yard office. .
Motion by Hauge to recommend aMoval of the permit with the stipu-
lation that the north and the south walls have paint on, or better.
Seconded by Tronco. There being no nays the motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
CPA-4��
Acting Secretary to the Board
t5 t i
:t
• APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA: 3 >>
OWNER'S . NAME R'. hI • A a v .L7 J / h "UILDER i•cere:a.�
ADDRESS ��J•%') '�. ADDRESS %(oS--* L- ...•'�i�� """. --
LOCATION OF BUILDING r
NO, STREET PART OF LOT
LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
CORNER LOT INSIDE LOT SETBACK SIDE -YARD
SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION .;
Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates,of Survey of Loot aad :proposed'
building location drawn on these Certificates.
DESCRIPTION OF' BUILDING "
• To be used as;:
Front Depq - Height
Sq..Ft. S 7 Cu. Ft.. �5 o
Front Depth Height'
Sq. Ft. Cu: Ft.
Type of Constructio
n,G��. -�.e� : Estimated Cost
To be completed ,..,,,, moo/
The undersigned hereby makes application for permit for the work herein"
i specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance. with the City of
Fridley Ordinances,and rulings, of.the Department of Build #ngs, and.'hereby r..
declares that all the"facts and representations stated in this application ;•,
are true and correct.
DATE_ 4 t 19 �o S� SIGNATURE'/
(Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side).
�AV e � -
Ask
i
I
I
:
- � r
tl I
I
:
i
i
i
I
i
9.2'
11)16A�7M.560 &11101V 71-le
r
I
I
' I �
C1, 7Y AQVe I,Powra✓ ► I ' - - -
i
�
L
I
I
:
- � r
tl I
I
:
i
i
i
I
i
9.2'
11)16A�7M.560 &11101V 71-le
r
I
I
' I �
C1, 7Y AQVe I,Powra✓ ► I ' - - -
i
•
FRIDLEY HOUSING ABD RF.OEt= %V AMORrff METING r SEPTEMM 29, 1965
The meeting was called to order at 8:10 P.M.
ROLL
Present: Chairsan Richard Rerder. Commissioners Paul Barrow, John Neyery
Lois Mullin, Robert Kendall, and Executive Director .Allan Anderson.
Visitors Charles Johanxaon, Doyle Mullin, D=yl Nagle and Richard
Kinsman of the CCFDR, and Tom Hodne of Hodne Associates.
Absent: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES R NWING OF SEPTEOER 2&2_1 g6
The following correction should be made in fk* minutes of this meeting:
Page 4, paragraph 5, lines 3 ahould react, "figures were higber than
the S & P Application."'
Mr. Barrow made a notion that -the minutes of the testing of September 22, 1965
be accepted as corrected. Mr. Meyer seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote,
• fibre being no nays, said motion curried umnimously.
CC - ICATI ®NS - LLTTM FROM JA `CE
A letter from the Fridle.1 Jaycees, dated September 23, 1965, was received.
This letter was to inform the Housing Authority of a resolution the Jaycees
passed taking a stand alpinst the proposed urban renewal, program.
CCKCNICATIONS a CCFM
Mr. Dsxyl Nagle of the Citizens Committee for Fridley Disaster Relief stated
that this orgemi=tioa is in & pport of the proposed urban renewal and an
offer of assistance t s exteaded. Mr. 17 le further stated that the coffee
parties his group in promoting are receiving general public acceptance.
COMMICATIONS -- IMI!TRRS FROM THE ice.
Four letters were received from the Houses; and Home Fiance Agency, Office of
the Regional. Administrator, Chi glo, Illinoie, dated 27 September 1965- Thase
letters were to iiifaatz the Authority of the assigned project numbers on the
City Center and Riverriew Projects and to advise the Authority of Section 402 of
the Housing Act of 3965 requiring th:e submission of a statement concerning the
acquisition of real proporty.
CMWHICATIONS - L ' FROM GROSF LOSE, ' :. LLIAlt & ASSOCIATES
•Two letters dated September 22, 1965 u *ra received from Groseclose, Williams
cis .Associates constituting their ford proposals for rouse appraisals in the
City Center end University Ave =e projects end a tr=sient study for a motel
complex in tho University Avenue project.
... 2 m
0 CONWHICATIONS 1,7EMIrGa PROH NORLNUE'S72MIt DM �L T.R'OPHO E COVANY
A letter was received. from lell Tolephone Compwy, slated September 20,
1965, giving -the charges for c i additional telaphone with &M Outside line for
the Authority. lfhe ;Wort vae apprwrad amd Clair n, Herder directed Mr. Anderson
to order the additional telerhone.
HUCUTIVE DIRECTW S RF ' - HM,3TTNG3
Executive Director Allan Anderson rotated that iah* following meetings had been
attended by representatives of the Housing Authori-ty: Coffee parties at the
Meyarhof l o , P2etcalf's and Black's; P. Ming at Midland Coop.; and a luncheon
with the rotary Club.
1!7MUTIVE DIRECTOR'S RE T - ARCH7_T?a RUBE, CLASS! UlffIVERSITY OF ML"11ESOTA
Chairman3 Herder stated that he head attended the indoctrination class of the
Senior Seminar Architeetum Cl ase at the University of Mixanesota being taught
by Tom Hodne. At this alass, general requim -vents of the City Center Ar*a
YDrolect were given to students and Chairm&n Herder hPd answered detailed
questions concerning the project.
OLD BUSIMS - H0DIM- BILL FOB MINMITY AV&Wv
Tom Hodne explained how his billing was prepared and hogs the percentages were
• derived on an item by item to -si.e . John Meyer asked to see & point by point
worts completion loreakdown. Mr. Rodzae replied that he has not had the time to
write a detailed description of work done and requested that at least the sub-
contracts be paid at thin time end he will outline wo- k completed by item at
a later elate .
Mr. Barrow mde a cootie h that the 817,434 account be paid to Hodne Aseerciateo .
Mr. Meyer seconded.. This motion vous used ux animously with the understanding
that Hodne would fu=i.. sh a work completion breakd,o►tm at a later date.
OLD BDSINM - C= ISTATOWn
I.k. Hodne stated that the bill for 8861.50 on the special study should be paid
by the City under tho tochniasl aid account. Mr. BexTow made a motion that
the Authority pay tho City Statement dated September 15, 1965, with the excep-
tion of the $61.50 item. &Ts. hul.lin seconded and the motion Wood unanisously.
CID BUS11OSS FIDELITY BOND AND WOR'M'S CalEMAT103
The cost for a one year premium on the Fidelity Bond and Workmen's Compensation
will be $162.64. Mr. Barrow vuade a motion that this amount be paid to Anderson
Insurance Company. The, motion =ras seconded by Mr. Kendall and posed unanimously.
0ID BCSINMS - HEALTH INStWCE
• It was generally decided that the proposed Aetna plan was the beat. Chairman
Herdor directed Mr. Anderson to request the Aetna Wnt prepare a detailed
s6hednle on the Health Insurance and Major Medical policies.
- 3 -
• OLD BUSI S - n'MMTION BULURTO
Tom Rye prevented a forrm at of the pxoposed brochure, by pW, and a
photograph of thee area zva d o'c ated ,t hat ESL will 1"Mmish mitten Matori&l to
the Commission on Futuce'da , Septai Aber 30, 1965. The Cts izoi on will review
the booklet and met on Sat-mday, (),--tabor 2, 1965 to discuss and approve the
brochure. It was rst;mted that the estimated can's of 5,00+0 double- , fold -
out type brochures will be
A motion ww made by N.s. Mullin to purchase the Adler Electric typeriter
from the Fridley Office Supply Company. the notion teas seconded by Mr. Dyer
and approved unanisou sly.
MISCELzrrS
Chair mm Border requested the Rxecutive Director obtain actual coset of flood
work and annual maintenance in the Riverview project area,srnd estimated
figures for rigr p of the rigor frontap and diking.
A question concernirZ Vaether the blind issue should be p"sented as one item
or three separate items vas Twotanted. After a longthy discussion by all members
• of the Authority as to the relative merits of the single issue versus the three
separate issues in the bard election, it van moved by Fir. Barrow and seconded
by Mr. gendall thst the epthori.ty send a smewor .cis.?m (attexhad) to the City
Council recommending thet thra separate bond issuea be voted upon in the
gen�aral election of ffo� -,e `der 2, 1965. A voice vote u called. Vx. Myer
voted no, stating: "I Isiah to paint out that the Authority ahW.&d decide the
sil€ssophy and the wortAiiiness of the the TzoJects e►.d onee haves dome that
they should re=d all tln ea pro jecfte as part of the orte co=mnity effort and
not to recommond to the Coumci l in any f�hi ors t��t -'the projects are
conoidored as ind 1xi u ll. of extz as i 1orso;h±= y ons c wt be sewate
frm the others in o of wg p�t we e down,:; in Uhze kathority." 'Upon a majority
vote, the motion ups pavEvd.
LiUUMVIW ►
It was stated that a Iv-nd remie policy abould be considered by the authority
at their next sating.
AWOMMIT
As there was no ftarther business, Mr . K"endal l r0he a motion that the meting
be adjourned at 11:45 p.M. Hr. Meyer seconded and the motion w9a passed
'Lumnimously.
Reepeetfull,* submitted
i
Lois Mullin, Secretary
Fridley Housing & Redew1opment Authority
The meeting was called to order at S :4U P.M.
ROLL
Present: Chairman Richard Harder, Comasissioners John Mayor, Lois Mullin,
Robert Xerndall, and Executive Director Allan Anderson
Visitors: Robert Soott, Harold Callander, and Dave Alberts of
Hodne Associates.
Absent: Paul Barrow
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 22, 1 b
The following correction was .de:
Attached memorandum to City Councii, Paragraph 3, line 4 should read,
"...the dissenting vote being..."
Mr. Kendall made a motion that the minutes of the meeting of September 29, 1965,
be approved as corrected. Mr. Meyer seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
• COfi9MICATIONS - NAHRO APPLICATION
Mr. Anderson stated that he had received two different types of application
for membership and recommended that a decision be postponed until be can ebeck
to see which application is appropriate.
CO MICATIONS - RIGHWAY DLPARTIGNT
A letter was received from the Highway Department dated October 1, 1965,
stating their concurrence with the proposed service road plans.
CWHUNICATIONS URA
General Urban Renewal informtion was received from the URA and placed in the
files for future reference.
CaM. NICATIONS - MEMO FROM HODNE ASSOCIATES
A memo was received from Hodne Associates, subject: "Potential Tax Relief as
a Result of Proposed Re-Dee." It was stated that thee* figures a" for ones
to be used an the forthcoming Renewal Brochure.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - COFFEE PARTY PRESENTATIONS
• Mr. Anderson stated that several coffee parties had been attended this week
by hiwelf and/or members of the Commission.
9
•
Page 2
MC'f3TIVE DIRECTOR'S REPO - DISTRICT 14 SCHOOL BOARD
An invitation was extended to Mr. Anderson to address the District 14 School
Board. on October 12, 1965, concerning Urban Renewal. Mr. Anderson stated that
he will attend this at.
EXECUTIVE DIRMTOR *S RAT - ST. WILLIAM'S CHURCH
A factual presentation on Urban Renewal will be given by Per. Anderson to the
parishioners of St. William's Church on October 12, 1965, at 8:30 P.M.
MMUTIVE DUMTOR'S RLVMT - LIONIS CLUB
The Lion's Club has requested an Urban Renewal ,speaker for their meeting on
Tuesday, October 12, 1965. It was decided that Chasirman Herder would represent
the Commission at this meeting.
RIB WT OF SPECIAL CGti TITTLE - INFOR 4ATION BUIJMIN
Mr. .Alberta of Sodne Associates stated that the bulletin should be reedy for
printing th* early part of next week. Mr. Kendall and Mrs. Mullin were
appointed as a committee to work with Mr. Anderson in securing printing bids
and ealecting a printer.
OLD BUSINESS -. TELEPEM INSTALLATION
Mr. Anderson stated that the telephone had been installed in the Authority
office the afternoon of October 6, 1965; the new number is 560 - ,2100.
OLD BUSINESS - HEALTH INSti MC$
Mr. Anderson submitted a complete breakdown of the rates for the Realth
Insurance program for FMIA employees. Mr. Kendall made a motion that we
accept the policy; Mr. Meyer seconded the notion. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, said motion cried unanimously.
NAT BUSINESS - LAPdli DISPOSAL POLICY
Mr. Anderson recommended that the Co mission gait until the hell committee,
was present before deciding the land disposal policy. Chairman Herder appoint"
a subcommittee (consisting of Jobe Meyer, Allan Anderson. Wyman Smith and
:mil Barrow, who will be the chairman) to review the different policies availa-
ble and make a recomendation to the Commission.
001 : r
Mr. Meyer recommenda;:d tkmLt we n4md a letter to the Jayceeees asking t ou to
explain their reasons for their stand against Urban Renewal so we can under-
stand their purpose and tslm full recommendation of their very worthy view.
After some discussion, Mr. Payer made a motion that the aforementioned letter
be sent to the Jaycees. Mr. Kendall seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, said motion carried unanimously. Chairman Harder
directed Mr. Anderson to compote the letter.
0
5`)
MISCHLLANEM
Mrs. Mullin mentioned having a Citizen's Advisory Committee to act as a
liaison between the Authority and the public and auggested an editorial be
written for the paper stating the desire of the Authority to have such an
advisory coraittee. Mr. Anderson explained how the committee is formed and
what their function is. Chairman Herder requested Mrs. Mullin write an
editorial for the Coammission,s review at their next meeting.
It was stated that Mr. Anderson should try to set up a meeting before the
Planning Commission and all other City Co mitties giving a factual presentation
of the Urban Renewal plans up to this date.
MISCMLLAZHM
Mr. Anderson Wasented the requested item by Stem work breakdown from Hodne
Asmociates. Mr. Meyer requested a central file be established for easy
reference to the proMmse made by Body* Associates on each project.
RRUSS
Mr. Meyer made a motion that the meeting be recessed until Mr. Hodne arrived
• and the Commission could bear his report. Mr. Kendal seconded the motion and
stated that if Mr. Hodne uid not arrive by 110:00 P.M., the Ming should be
adjourned.
•
L%kkfi, .1 r i.�
At IWO P.M., an Mr. Hodne bad not Y&t arrived and there was no further business,
Mr. Meyer made a motion tbat the meting he mdjourned. Mrs. Mullin seconded
and the motion passed. unanimously.
Respectfully xubmitted,
Lois Mullin, Secretary
Ridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority
0
0
September 30, 1965
y
o�
1
Mr . Earl Wagner
City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Dear Mr. Wagner:
As we previously discussed, it is our understanding that effective in
early November, the freeway in front of our location will carry highway
markers as Interstate 694 and that it will no longer be designated
as Highway 100 on either the maps or highway markers.
',1e have been using Highway 100 in our address and as it appears this
would no longer be a correct address, we respectfully ask permission to
use the following as the address for this location:
Midland Cooperatives, Inc.
I -694 at Main Street Northeast
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421
will appreciate obtaining approval as rapidly as possible so that
=.s we print up new forms, we can begin using this address.
Sincerely,
L. E. Torrey, Manager
Transportation and Warehousing
mpson
60
MAIN OFFICE • 739 JOHNSON STREET N. E. . MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413 • TELEPHONE 331 -6030
OFFICE SALES— HARDWARE — WAREHOUSING — TRAFFIC 56 HIGHWAY 100 N.E. • MPLS., MINN: 55421 • PHONE 560.4100
Moral 6 -4941
ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, Inc.
GENERAL OFFICES:
DELMAC BUILDING
25 University Avenue S. E.
bM NEAPOLLS, MIIUMOTA 55414 October 8, 1965
I -Ir. Earl Wagner, City 1lanager
City of Fridley
6431 University N. E.
Fridley, I-Linn. 55121
Dear Iir. Wagner:
T
Please put me on the agenda of the next Council meeting in
regard to the road that was agreed and dedicated to the City
of Fridley on our property, which is on 63rd and Highway 65,
as we would like to be there.
Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
0,.�.� a
Max Saliterman
MS -js
P.S. Please notify re when the meeting will be held.
l
•
MEMO TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
MEMO FROM: Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer
MEMO DATE:. October 13, 1965
MEMO NUMBER: #65 -66
RE: Fridley Sewer System
As you are aware, we had sewer backups all over
the City during the spring of this year and the sewer lines,
especially in University Avenue, were surcharged.
City Council, City of Fridley, will have to
decide fairly soon, whether certain areas of Fridley will be
transferred into NSSSD sewer lines to relieve the pressure on
our existing interceptors.
The only other alternative would be a stop gap
arrangement like in the Sylvan Hills area to relay the lines
and run the sewage westerly into the lift station. Doing this
will only solve the problem for this area. As you know, we
had sewer backups on the East side of University Avenue, also.
I pointed out these things to you in Memo #65 -54
dated August 30, 1965. I feel that some immediate . decisions will
have to be made by City Council either to transfer some areas to
NSSSD lines or try to make stopgap arrangement to solve the
problem by local modifications.
As we are getting into the winter and the construc-
tion time is running short, we should proceed with the construc-
tion immediately so that we do not have a repetition of the
problem we had this spring.
NASIM QURESHI, P.E.
City Engineer
G2
Y
,r0 • � 1.
STATE OF MINNESOTA 64311UNIV�ERSR1DVE N.E.
DEPARTMENT OR HIGHWAYS R C C E' V E
ST. PAUL, MINN. 55101 c D
Mr. Donald C. Savelkoul
.Attorney At Lax
6315 University Avenue N.$,
Fridley 21, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Savelkouls
March 26, 1964 ra % 1 1964
aM P
"x'1819110111112111213141516
Res S.P. 0207 (65 =5)
Vicinity of Moore Lake
61st Ave. N.E. and 63rd
Ave. N.E. in Fridley
Anoka County
Your letter of March 23rd has been referred to me for response.
Your information that 6let'Avenus N.E. and its continuation
via West Moore Lake Drive, from the East River Road to Central Avenue has
ibeen designated a Municipal State Aid street is correct.
However, this Department has not yet been contacted for any
changes to present T.H. 65 in this area.
There is no crossover presently at 61st Avenue N.E.
..
Because of the potential importance of the 61st Avenue cross
route it may be logical to place a crossover at this point and close the
crossover at 63rd Avenue N.E. The latter street provides very limited
continuity of travel being open only on the east side.
An additional crossover at 61st Avenue would be in such prox-
imity to the 63rd Avenue crossing, if left inplace, that a hazardous situ-
ation would no doubt result..
In arty event these matters will all be fully considered when
directed to this Department by the Village of Fridley. Before air changes
are made in the present highway the neoeasary hearings will be conducted.
We will be pleased to discuss this matter further with you
after more specific develop wnt takes place.
Sincerelyp
DEPARTM1iT OF HIM4
G. F. Welch
District Engineer
os Nasin Qureski, Village Engr. 4W'
- Fridley
611- 3
64
HALL, SMITH, HEDLUND, DUSTER, FORSBERG AND FEIKEMA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
• DOUGLAS, HALL October 11, 1965 3„ PRODUCE BANK BUILDING
WYMAN SMITH
M IN NEAPO L18r MINN ESOT^ 55409
GEORGE HEDLUND
999'1401
LEONARD T. DUSTER
THOMAS G. FORSBERG OFFICER IN.,
HENRY H. FEIKEMA 088E0
RONALD L. HASKVITZ COON RAPID■
FRIOLEY
Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Re: Kenneth Charles Kraus v.
Ivan Ericson, John Doe, et al.
Dear Earl:
You transmitted a copy of the Summons and Complaint in
the above matter which was served on Mr. Ericson on
• September 21, 1965, to me. Simultaneously you sent a
copy to Richard Schillinger of the Anderson Agency.
The suit involves a wrongful arrest and imprisonment
allegedly made by defendant Ericson, a police officer of
the City of Fridley, together with two other police of-
ficers of the City of Columbia Heights, on Sunday,
January 6, 1963, at 3:00 o'clock a. m. The demand is for
$5,000.00 of damages plus punitive damages of $5,000.00.
I am now in receipt of a letter from Mr. Schillinger in-
dicating that the U.S.F. and G. will not answer the suit
because the City of Fridley was not directly named. I
think it might be appropriate for you to put this matter
on the agenda and see if the City Council wants to
authorize me to put in the defense. I have already asked
for an extension to the 25th of October for answering
purposes.
Yours truly,
Wyman Smith
• WS /rac
a11
•
HALL, SMITH, HEDLUND, DUSTER, FORSBERG AND FEIKEMA
ATTORNEYY AT LAW
DOUG U8 HALL October 12, 1965 3 11 PRODUCE BANK BUILDING
WYMAN SMITH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 88403
GEORGE HEDLUND
239-14 81
LEONARD T. DUSTER
THOMAS G. FORA MEMO OFFICES IN:
HENRY M. FEIKEMA OSSEO
RONALD L. MASKVIT2 COON RAPID■
FRIDLEY
Mr. Marvin C. Brunsell
City Clerk
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Re: The three bond issues for Housing
and Redevelopment. Area Projects.
Dear Marvin:
Last week you called my attention to Section 205.17 of the
Minnesota Statutes dealing with election law. Subdivision 3
of that section prescribes that any proposition for the
issuance of bonds shall be printed on one separate blue col-
ored ballot and shall be prepared, printed and distributed
under the direction of the City Clerk at the same time and
in the same manner as other city ballots. The ballots,
when voted,shall be deposited in a separate ballot box painted
blue, to be procured by the local authorities for each voting
precinct.
I have advised you that, in my opinion, this statute is the
election law applicable to the City of Fridley. The ballot
will have to be on one blue sheet, rather than three separ-
ate ballots. I also suggested that you might use some heavy
separation lines of some kind, so that the voter would thor-
oughly understand that he has three separate questions to
vote upon.
Yours truly,
Wyman Smith
WS /rac
cc: Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
6+31 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
i
6F-)
f�fz
PHONES 788 -2144
LAW OFFICES
WARD P. GRONFIELD
856 40TH AVENUE N. E.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55421
October 12, 1965
City Council
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is a quit claim deed to the North 30 feet
of 54th Avenue from the Sacred Heart of Jesus Polish
Catholic Church to the City of Fridley. The deed
recites as consideration the abatement of the present
water and sanitary sewer assessments, the further
consideration that the City of Fridley will not as-
sess the cemetery property for water, sanitary sewer
and storm sewer, and that the city will construct
and maintain back slopes to prevent erosion and pro-
vide lateral support. The church has already re-
moved its fence and has relocated two graves in the
area quit claimed in accordance with the understand-
ing reached at the Octover 4 council meeting.
The Sacred Heart of Jesus Polish Catholic Church
agrees that assessments against the cemetery prop-
erty for surfacing and curbs on 54th Avenue N.E.
will be accepted and paid.
We trust that this deed and letter are sufficient and
that the council in accepting the deed will pass the
necessary resolution abating the present assessments
and providing that na future water, sanitary sewer
or storm sewer assessments will be levied.
Very ruly yours,
Ward P. Gronfield
WPG: sg
Enclosure
Conditions concur in
D'�;.I.,,Co-. Minneapolis, Minn.
Quit Claim Deed. Form No. 30-M. It r.� 67
Corporation to individual. Minnesota 07ancing Blanks
1}
Tbis Inbenturep Alade, this... .. . .............................................. day of
between... §Aqred "eart of Jesus:.... Polish Catholig qII-q
....................................................................... ........................... . ..................................................................
a corporation under the lau-8 of the State of..�Kinn.e.qola .......................................... P party'of the first part, and
.......... ... .. .. ... ...
City ... R'g .... ggidl!�.Y.j ..... A ... mun.1p ip.R47 .... P.o.rp.9Xgj.iq4
....... ........... . ........... .. .... ... ... ... . ......................................................................................................
............ I ... ............................................................................... . .........................................................................................................................................................
ofthe County of ........ Angkg............................. ............................and State of.MARAP.Q.1a ..................................... I .......................
pariff ............ of the second part,,
WITNESSETH, That , the i,said party -ofl:.the first 'part,�in' of
abatement,-Iof present assessments for sanitary sewer and water in the
amount;'of"$1540.08 and ,the - further consideration that the•City of
h Fridley will not assess party of the first part for any water, sani-
I �
tary sewer or storm sewer improvements present or future and that the
Oity of 2ridley, during construction work on 54th Avenue N.E. will
construct and maintain adequate back slopes within the area herein
quit claimed to prevent erosion and provide lateral support for the
i cemetery property, does hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Convey
unto the said party of the second part and their assigns, Forever,
all the tract or parcel of land lying and being in the County of
Anoka and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit:
The North thirty (30) feet of that certain platted street in the City
of 2ridley known as 54th Avenue X.E., lying between 5th Street.N.E,
and 6th Street U.E.
Part of the first part, at its expense, will remove its fence and
two (2) graves within the area herein quit claimed.
TO JbAbt ants to 301b tbt *amt, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances there.
unto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said part....,Y .......... of the second part, .................... : ........................
1 1 *ei nd assigns, Forever.
Itt Tegtit=ny WWCOL The said first party has caused these
presents to be executed in its corporate name by
.. .........
President- and . .... Ak� ... fr-?I:iti(!and its corporate seat to
be hereunto affixed the day and year first a&ove wn'tten./.
fAesus Polish Cgtholic
KqA..,Aart o
yen national union o� Operating Engineers
LOCAL UNION NO. 49, 49A, 49B, 49C, 49D and 49E
•
MINNESOTA AND NORTH DAKOTA
°
LAWRENCE J. GOUGH, President ?�oN ..F ° °41 4 A1HBated with AF.L.- C.I.O.
JOE BERGMAN, Vice- President
LARKIN McLELLAN,
Recording - Corresponding Secretary
FRANS PENDZIMAS. Treasurer
DALE L. BURCHETT, Business Manager ,
2560 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
ST. PAUL, MINN. 55114
Phone: 646 -2661
October 11, 1965
Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota
Dear Sir:
This is to advise you that a majority of the non-
professional employees of the Fridley Engineering Department
have affiliated with Local No. 49, International Union of
Operating Engineers. I am enclosing a copy of a petition signed
by the majority of the employees for your files.
In accordance with the action of the employees, I
now respectfully request that Local No. 49 be recognized as
the formally recognized representative of the majority of the
non - professional employees of the Fridley Engineering Depart-
ment.
LML /rg
0
Very.truly yours,
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 49
Larkin McLellan,
Area Business Representative
68
69
We, the undersigned employees of the City of Fridley•
employed in the Engineering Department, hereby designate
Local No. 49, International Union of Operating Engineers
to represent us in matters pertaining to wages, working
conditions, and grievances with our employer.
/s/ James E. Angelo 10 -2 -65
/s/ Gerald J. Nordlund 10 -2 -65
:1
/s/
Rene, D.
Kreutter
10 -2 -65
/s/
Curtis
L. Dahlberg
10 -2 -65
:1
•
October 15, 1965
M E M 0
TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
FROM: Marvin C. Brunsell, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Sewer usage charge for Deb's Grocery, 5659 University
Avenue Northeast
On January 1, 1964 Deb's Grocery was back billed for sewer usage for
the period January 1, 1956 up to the end. of 1963. A sewer and water
permit had been taken out in 1955 for the property, but for some reason
an account was not started. on this \property. When it was discovered
that Deb's Grocery was using sanitary sewer service, they were then
billed. The total amount of the back billing amounted to $160.00.
Inasmuch as we have no authority to grant any concessions relating to
the sewer or water service, they were billed for the entire period for
which they had not been billed on a regular basis. If the City Council
wishes to grant some sort of an adjustment on this matter, we can
adjust the account.
a
! 0
70
r
I0
MEMO
TO: Earl P. Wagner
SUBJECT: Moving permits for Double Bungalows at 5600/5602, ,
5606/5608, 5612/5614, 5618/5620 - 6th Street N.E.
DATE: October 11, 1965
FROM: Raymond Bade
A Building Permit was issued to Lake Urban, Inc.
for the four duplexes on April 2, 1956. At that time, no
moving permit was required by the City of Fridley.
I cannot find record of any action by the Planning Commission
or the Council concerning these duplexes. The Building Board
was not established until 1958.
The following is the record of I permits taken out for these
properties:
d
71
PERMIT NO.
BUILDING
CONTRACTOR
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
1820
All four
duplexes
fTa _Urban Inc.
General
3521
All four
duplexes
egasco, Inc.
Plumbing
7889
All four
duplexes
McCall & Co.
General - denied by
Council
2287
5606 -6th
Street N.E.
Mpls. Gas Co.,
Inc.
Plumbing
1007
5608 -6th
Street N.E.
Mpls, Gas Co.,
Inc.
Plumbing
483
5612 -6th
Street N.E.
Owner
862
5612 -6th
Street N.E.
Mpls. Gas Co.,
Inc.
Plumbing
1728
5612 -6th
Street N.E.
Mpls. Gas'-Co.,
Inc.
Plumbing
t
C1
C L A I M S
0
0
General and Public Utilities 6774 through 6893
Liquor
7893 through 7925
72
ESTIMTES TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL - OCTGBZR No 1965
Comstock & DavLat Inc.
Consulting Enginalwo
1446 County Road d.#"
Kiiu�eapolias iota 55432
For the futnish3ng of resident inspection and resident
supervision for the staking out of the construeItion. vork
for the following:
Estimate #5 - water Zmprovefaent Project Nud")ev
75 -8 from August 30o 1965 to September 25v 1965#
(rooster station - 63rd Aveaue N.Z. . & T.H. #100) $ 30:00
Estimate #7 - Water IMroveidat Project NMOMr
75 -A from August 300 196S to S4ptadw 2So 19650
(Three Addition" Drift wells)
Estimate #2 - sanitary sewer & Water Zmpsovement
project Number 73 -A from August 30, 1965 to
September 25, 1965 (54th 5th AMR.)
Estimate #2 - Storm Sewer zi rov project
Number 73 from August 300 1965 to Septsmbw 25,
19658 (54th Av*aue Northeast),
$ 80.00
$2,482075
$ 589050
Estimate #10 - Sanitary Sewer & Water rmprovOMUt
Project NuIDber 70 from August 30 1965 to Septe®-
ber 2So 1965 (Riverview Terracet south of Missi-
ssippi Plaee= Lincoln (Ashton) Stteoto south of
Ironton Street$ 5th Street8 south of T.H. #100)0 $ 60600
Estimate 015 - Sanitary sewGX & Water YmprovM%Mt
Project der 67 from August 308 1965 to Septem-
ber 2Sa 19650 (1964 Sanitary Sewer & Water Program .$ 5.00
Estimate #6 - Water Isproveoent project Number 34-0
from August 308 1965 to septa*orr 258 196S (Crosslog
T.B. ,#694 - Jolnaon Street, 7th Street) o $ 30.00
$3,277.25
l�3
74
MEMO TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
MEMO FROM: Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer
MEMO DATE: ,October 14, 1965
MEMO NUMBER: #65 -68
RE: Pavments to Debris Clean Uv Contractors
The following is a list of invoices submitted by
j different clearing contractors to date:
I
Invoice
Number Contractor Eguw iippment Amount
Bob Crawford 1Dump Truck /operator $ 456.00
1824 Fridley Trucking Co. Tandem Trash Trucks $1,090.00
TOTAL $1,546.00
i
If the form and type of invoice is satisfactory to you, and
it is Council's wish to pay these costs, then these bills can be paid
as the hours have been checked and O.K.'d by the Public Works Department.
NASIM QURESHI, P.E.
City Engineer
•
•
LIST OF GOMRACIMS LICUSES TO BE APPROVED BY COMIL
OCTOBER 18, 1965
ELECTRICAL
Richmond & Sons, Electric
2810 Major Avenue North
Minneapolis 22, Minnesota by; Sigurd E. Follese, Jr.
GAS SE` VICES
Twin City Furnace Company
459 North Snelling
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
by; Robert E. Paterson
GMWRAL COKTRACTORS
Stanley A. Burda Construction
4547 Birch Bond Lane
White Bear Lake 10, Minnesota by; Stanley A. Burda
Edward Chios
52 First Street S. E.
New Brighton 12, Min nesota
Dawn Construction, Inc.
2645 Webster Avenue
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Gerald Glenn Corporation
1202 Hathaway Lane N. B.
Fridley 21, Minnesota.
D. J. Kranz Company, Inc.
2033 West Broadway
Minneapolis, Minnesota
HEATING
Reliable Resting & Cooling, Inc.
744 Adams St. N. s.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Twin City Furnace Compan y
459 North Snelling
• St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
MASOM
Dave Berry Construction
837 Monroe St. N. E.
Spring Lake Park, Minnesota
by: Edward Chies
by; Earl Pierce
by: A. C. Gnerre
by: G. G. Kranz
by; Ronald G. Blank
by; Robert E. Petersen
by; David 'Berry
RENEWAL
NEW
NEW
RENEWAL
NEW
NEW
IZL.�1
NEW
NEW
r-y
U
A & W Drive4n
7429 East River Road
Fridleys Minnesota
A & W Driveia
7429 East River Road
Fridley, Minnesota
East River Road Garage,
6501 East River Road NEE.
Fridley, Minnesota
Fridley Big Save
East River Rd. at Osborns
Fridley,, Minnesota
11,
Fridley Big Save
East River Rd. at Osborne
Fridley, Minnesota
byt M & L Corporation
Leo A. Murphy
7 Went Simrial -Drive
West St,Fauls Minnesota
bys M & L Corporation
Leo R. Morpby
7 West Imperial Drive
West St. Paulo Minnesota
bys Joseph Dolin
95 Mississippi Way NA,
Fridleyp Minnesota
byt Jobn W. Bourn Jr.
3310 Douglas Drive Nor6h
Crystals Minnesota
bys Joins W, Bauron Jr.
3310 Douglas Drive Korth
Crystal,, Minnesota
Nea
New
NOW
Nev
LIST OF MULTIPLE DWSMI"NGS TO BE LXCENSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY C(W=L
OCTOBER 18 2 1965 SEPTEMBER 1, 1965 SEP7 M ER 1, 1966
NAME AND ADDRESS -0MR ADDRESS OF APT. BLDG, APT, UNITS FEE PD.
Warren E. Berg
3920 - 39th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesotan
Harold M. Battig
1.640 Spring Valley Road
Minneapolis 22, Minnesota
Ralph J. Braun
5929 Kellogg Avenue South
Edina 24, Minnesota
A. G. & Ronald L. Bruch
294 Washburn Avenue North
Minneapolis 5, Minnesota
5320 - 4th Street N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
150 a 59k Way N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
5420 - 5th Street N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
221 Satellite Lane
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Wendell G. & Elsie Elliott
120 Hartman Circle N. B. 6511 - 2nd St. N. E.
Fridley, Minnesotan 55432 Fridley, Minnesota 55432
• ' Raylhmd T. Game
5009 Excelsior Blvd.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
.Haugen & Quell*
Wayzata Bank Building
Wayzata, Minnesota
Leo J. Hynes
2724 Irving Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesotan
Leo J. Hynes
2724 Irving Avenue forth
Minneapolis, Min nesota
Hy Ytman
1834 Oregon Avenue North
Minneapolis 26, Minnesota
David J. Lyytinen
218 Gramercy Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota
n
LJ
5428 - 5th St. 1i. E,
Fridley, Minnesotan 55421
6021 Main Street N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
6051-53 -55 • 3rd St. N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
540002 - 7th St. N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
4913 -17 - 3rd St. N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
390 - 57th Place N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
4 $10.00
12 12.00
4
11
4
4
4
3
3
7
4
10.00
11.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
i0
LIST (W ML°LTIPLE DWE3.` rNGS TO BE APPRM719D BY COUNCIL
PAGE 2.
OCTOBER 18, 1965
•
Atlan C. Mattson
120 Mississippi Plluce H. E.
120 Mississippi Place NoE.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
4 $10.00
Allan C. Mattson
120 Mississippi Place N. L,
157 Mississippi Place N.B.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
4 10.00
Walter Pistner
1827 Hillcrest Avenue
1060 W 64th Avenue Na 1.
St. PauX 16, Minnesota
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
715 15.00
Joseph A. Panicki
52.0 Lincoln St. N. 8.
321 - 79th Way N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
8 10.00
James B. Rudnitski
6035 Main St, V. E.
6035 Main St. N, E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
4 10.00
William J. Smith
c/o H. Gordon Taylor, Attorney
85 South Eighth Street
4901 Third Street N. B.
Minneapotis, Minnesota
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
7 10.00
Michael A. Tema
5940 East River Road
5940 East River Road
Fridley, Minnesota 55421.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
12 12.00
i0
APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT
Permit No.
Location, Lane & University Ave. N. E.
Fridley, Minn., Oct.. 1 1965
FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the
work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance
with the City Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings,
and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated
in this application are true and correct.
Owner Burger King Restaurant
• Kind of Building
- Used as Restaurant
Work to be completed about - Spring 1966
Estimated Cost $
DESCRIPTION
How installed:_ Pylon sign 210 sq. ft.
Dimensions:
Length 201 , Height 2814" Thickness
Distance from Sidewalk Roof
Constructed of: Iron, x , Wood
Illuminated: Yes, Neon
• Wiring Application No.
9M
Signed Ise)
ell i'
79
1 /
so
PETITION FOR WATER, SEWER LATERALS AND STREET SURFACING
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
Oct, z
To the City Council of Fridley, Minnesota:
We, the undersigned; constituting more than fifty -one per cent (51%) of the property
owners in number and in interest, in the following streets:
Street, from (flls� to L L I /Z�
t� Ln C Street, fromv�,.,.ti f to "yki___._A
Street, from�a.�.r.� _ to C
who will benefit by the proposed improvement, hereby petition that the following im-
provements be made.
I.
2.
3.
• We understand that the cost of said improvement will be assessed against the property
in the above described area in equal installments for a period not to exceed to
years with interest payable at the rate of _Le_% per annum on the unpaid balance.
We understand that, until preliminary engineering can be completed, it is impossible
to give accurate estimates of what these improvements will cost; but that based on cost
figures for similar work done in the City, it is estimated that these improvements will
cost:
1.
2
3.
NAME ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
i
Petition #28 -1965
September 9, 1965
Fridley City Council
Fridley, Minnesota
Dear Sirs:
Recently the old Johnson Street easement, which
borders our property, was dug up and water pipes were installed.
The excavation has been refilled with dirt, however, we under-
stand that there is no provision in the work contract to finish
off the filled area with sod, seed or even any kind of ground
cover. The easement, as it now stands detracts from the
appearance of the area and lowers the adjoining property values.
Also, fine dust sifts into all neighboring homes and furnishings
every time the wind blows, a condition not present before the
excavation and ref 111.
All of us have invested considerable time and money
to improve our property value. 11te request the council to help
retain our property values by appropriating funds to finish
off the easement to the same standards as the rest of the
1 adjoining property.
U
r
Sincerely,
do I'
�il_ i
-ale 6
Petition #29 -1965
;Ve the undersigned, rc�cogni2e Lee Novak and (or) Merle
. Otten, as our spokesman with the city of Fridley, to request;
1. Establishment of alleyway, with boundaries of 53rd and
54th Avenues Northeast, and between (4) fourth and (5) fifth
streets Northeast, Fridley. ().ynn"Al n,,tk ,n t 0outh�
2. Survey and pave said alley way.
3. Maintain said alley.
Property owners and addresses as follows;
6-311 k 4",- 0
3-o
IF
� `v 4 / , V t J"�
0
y (Y / D
'�- 300
�33y
82
Petition #k29 -1965 (Continued)
1 "de the undersigned, recognize Lae Novak and (or) Yerle
Otten, as our spokesman with the ci Uy of Fridley, to request;
• 1. Establishment of alleyway, with boundaries of 54th and
55th avenues Northeast, and 3etween (4) fourth and (5) fifth
streets Northeast, Fridley.
2. Survey and pave, said alleyway.
3. Maintain said alley.
Property owners ana addresstss as follows;
0
cab
<� f 861
Petition #29 -1965 (Continued)
lo
SAO- � 7a3
J
r I Cam,(, 533 - g5�
4
f �,
8'7
Phone 825 -5557
AAA Tree Service
• 3028 Bryant Ave. So.
A I' M' 55408
mneapo is, n".
i
Working Agreement
We, the undersigned, agree that we are fully insured and responsible for any
damages due to our negligence which might occur while working for you.
p i
&e--a - �Icrcc yn :2 a i
Customer's Signature
j
Jim Swofford
e,�
J112 a
FROM e,, 61�ey
cry �epp
ADDRESS 7`� !/ ���5/ ORDER NO.
CITY 1- �"� �` �1 STATE / N K TERMS
® a�..oR■ s,a� Base bid for entire job: $12p000.00
i
"llp-mlyir
m-
Moe
Wm
A r,- W-1511 16 7,
JIF
1111 ffWA I
I
i
ZAY;YAlle
® a�..oR■ s,a� Base bid for entire job: $12p000.00
i
17A
8
GRADING CONTRACTORS
61 [
TNIRTY-BV[NTN AVt. N. t.
MINN[APOLIS, MINN980TA 58421
October 12, 1965
The Honorable City Council
Village of Fridley
Fridley, Minnesota.
Attention: Mr. Earl Wagner
Re: Lock Park Disaster Area
Gentlemen:
As per Mr. Paul Brown's request we propose to do all
the grubbing b clearing, removal of stumps, trees, and
other refuse pertaining to cleanup, furnish whatever
equipment necessary, supervision, and furnish
workmenls compensation, property damage, public
liability and bond if required on a cost -plus basis
with a guaranteed cost not to exceed $150000.00.
If our proposal is in line with your thoughts, we
would appreciate consideration.
ejf
0
Yours very truly,
PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Jr /
i�. sou, Treasurer
AM•
UPS /;:).g A? �{ � ' y 7 k c- t1- 4 .q �, h s� q,0 � � : s ;,x `9 0
� PArkMra� � /y
�o
1.2741
PARKWAY TREE & EXCAVATING SERVICE
�Ut
C. H. ESGET do SONS
3500 Eighteenth Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
/1 /Ut. Y
G V3
_ r k/ d 9 -�' �3 2 fI w e s /t �4
T2 S L b v p A, /s iti•
y- o /cz 772 /.!�L c y'1�/2c.� S %`G C3vAth..s,•G.. �L�cr
-We o h 7- .S T v a, S ty w i,�. L him &.4
0 c- 71 49 c L Fgp a` fj yZ .0 ' h/ 4•1 v
JavT' y aee, o G
sy O /
�7�
PArkway Ds1 l y
1.2741 �f
00 PARKWAY TREE & EXCAVATING SERVICE
C. H. ESGET do SONS
3500 Eighteenth Avenue South.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
T P- A4S
/3 7-H
O �
7-0 /C o' 4, T
Ca 1v e- L
B 04:, c r0 f3
Cf, Ta E> / if s., e w a 7"-
7- /z r S
a
e- /C-
D P.0e 9 To S 7`
y
4 o O L 13 P /L s S
h. h-'/ 4,/-
�7 4 y v !' r/ C;- 4, (a 2/S Oil 0.0- - S
.4 / -Y!& p o i CM /ZI /,7, jt ^ Aia
/`7 4F & / cr of e 1,0.4 y� it �1
/J .37 cOv TFf /S
h w
-*71 Al c X),, a L !Z. do
� ✓�' W �b.� /o ti T /.n.�L .L�%C3a1020 ho' /L L
r0 j-✓' /Y 2 / /J )- u lZ. /3 A.
!y _ 2
-
P Q
92
PArkway
1.2741
PARKWAY TREE & EXCAVATING SERVICE
C. H. ESGET & SONS
3500 Eighteenth Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
-17 w A- �2, �S o f y p r TU ^f .V
T o �
G,r.
C°
.F r
c.S .
l
r �
tl
� Y
93
A
r
. WILLIAM J. FORD
JAMES E. FORD
M. M. FORD
e -
HENRY FORD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Highway Beautification • Erosion Control • Land Clearing
Mr. Paul Brown
City of Fridley
Fridley City Hall
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Dear Mr. Brown:
AGC
September 22v 1965
820 WINNETKA NO.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
TELEPHONEr Lincoln 5 -7628
Res Repair and
Reclaimation of
Land
This is to confirm our conversation by phone in which you indicated
you would accept a bid from us in the matter of the above work.
• Normally we bid to a set of plans and specifications and can there-
fore submit either a unit price quotation based on measured quantities
or a lump sum quote. In this case the exact type of work and the volume
to be performed are not fixed, we felt you might find a great deal more
flexibility in an approach using an equipment- hour -rate schedule.
You will find attached a complete list of equipment that could
possibly be used on such work along with the rate. With this approach
you are committed to neither a maximum nor a minimum expenditure. If it
works out, we could continue until the work is completed or until you
have exhausted your a- tailable funds. If you findq after getting startedy
that the arrangement is not satisfactory , the operation can be
terminated with no additional cost other than the normal applied rates
to date.
We could start on this work immediately or we could delay it at
your convenience. This type of work, incidentally, can be carried on
during winter weather with no problem. .
Base bid for entire project: $121500.00....
Sincerely
AAW,/�jf
�1iam or
Presiden
Equipment Schedule
Quotation
City of Fridley
Attn: Paul Brown
s
A) Supervision - one man $5.00/hour
B) D -4 Traxavator with operator 14.00/hour
C) Ten cubic'yard tandem truck with operator 11.00/hour
D) Five cubic yard dump truck with operator 6,00 /hour
E) Chain saw - with operator 5.00ihour
F) Stump cutter - with operator 12,00/hour
G) Boom truck - with operator _ 8.00/hour
H) Common laborer 4.50/hour
1. Unit prices include all costs e.g., gas, equipment,
depreciation, pay roll taxes, etc.
2.. Prices include full insurance coverage, e.g., contradtor's
general liability and property damage, fleet and workmen's
compensation.
3. It is assumed that in work of this kind there will be
considerate coordination required between the contractor
and various city departments and this has been taken
into consideration.
4. We would endeavor to use and charge for, only that equipment
and man power which is absolutely necessary to prosecute the
work at the time.
0
0
!. .�.. 94-
•
•
CONSTRUCTION CO.
94- A
GRADING CONTRACTORS
4
�..,..•° S1 THIRTY - SEVENTH AVE. N. E.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA E8421
October 15, 1965
The Honorable City Council
Village of Fridley
Fridley, Minnesota
Attention: Mr. Earl Wagner
Re: Lock Park Disaster Area
Gentlemen:
We herewith submit for your consideration suggested
rates and conditions for grubbing & clearing, disposal
of stumps etc. on above captioned project at a cost
not to exceed $15,000.00.' This would include super-
vision, workments compensation, property damage,
public liability and bond'if required at the following
rental rates:
1. Superintendents ® $6.45 per hour including pickup.
2. D8 Dozer completely operated ® $17.50 per hour.
3. D6 Tractor & dozer completely operated @ $15.00 /hr.
4. Laborers @ $4.45 per hour.
S. Laborers with chain saws, axes, etc. ® $5.55 per hr.
Rates on other types of equipment will be furnished to
you on request.
ejf
Yours very truly,
PARK STRUCTION COMPANY
W. son, Treasurer
)
RiSOLUTTLON 140. / � �l
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND
• ES'iIMMS OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ST. 1966 -1
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley as follows:
1. That it appears in the interest of the City and of the property ownerr
affected that there be constructed certain improvements, to -wit:
Street Improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot -mix bituminous
teat, concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer system and sanitary sewer
services and other facilities located as follows:
(The petitions received and filed by the City for the improvements are
indicated opposite to the relative street.)
Petition No.
1. Kimball Street Riverview Terrace to B. River Rd. 11 -1965
2.
Janesville Street
Riverview Terrace
to E.
River Rd.
3.
Ironton Street
Riverview Terrace
to E.
River Road
4.
Hugo Street
Riverview Terrace
to B.
River Road 12 -1965
5.
Glencoe Street
Riverview Terrace
to 8.
River Road 12 -1965
• 6. Riverview Terrace Glencoe St. to Kimball St.
7. Broad Avenue Glencoe St. to Hugo St. 12 -1965
S. Broad Avenue Hugo Street to Kimball Street
9. 75th Avenue Old Central Ave. to Bacon Drive 10 -1965
43 -1964
10.
Service Drive along
73rd Ave. to 75th Ave.
Melody Manor
East of University
Plat
11.
Proposed Street
Madison Street
Lyric Lane to Osborne Road
12.
69th Avenue
E. River Rd. to Hickory Drive
23 -1965
13.
Hickory Drive includ-
69th Way to 70th Way
23 -196.5
ing Hickory Circle
14.
Hickory Place
Hickory Drive to 70th Way
23 -1965
15.
Bast -West Easement
Riverview Terrace to E. River Rd.
13 -1965
$o. of Mississippi
Place
•
16.
Pierce Street
Starts 700' So. of Mississippi St.
� Pp
21 -1965
to 63rd Avenue
96
2. That the City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to draw the
preliminary plans and specifications and to tabulate the results of hit
estimates of the costs of said improvements, including every item of
cost from inception to completion and all fees and ezpenseF incurred (or
to be incurred) In connection therewith, or the financing thereof, and
to make a preliminary report of his findings, stating therein vhether
said improvements are feasible and whether they can best be made at pro-
posed, or in connection with some other improvesents (and the estimated
• cost as recommended), including also a description of the lands or area
as may receive benefits therefrom and as may be proposed to be assessed.
Ordering Preliminary Plans
St. 19661
�gIts's 2,
17.
63rd Avenue
Pierce street'to State Aid Street
•
;9302 in Shorewood Shopping Center
18.
Lucia Lane
290' So. of 68th Place to 68th Place
19.
68th Place
Lucia Lane West to Service Road
20.
Service Drive Bast of
T.H. #65
68th Place to 68th Ave.
Hargted Plat
21.
Service Derive Rest of
T.H. #65
Shorewod Lounge to 63rd Ave.
22.
McKinley Street
66th Avis. to 66% Avenue
27 -1965
23.
66k Avenue
Alley between Fridley Street and
27 -1965
McKinley Street to Stinson Blvd.
24.
Fridley Street
Mississippi St. to 67th Avenue
25.
Anoka Strut
Mississippi St. to 67th Avenue
26.
66th Avenue'
McKinley St. to Stinson Blvd.
27 -1965
27.
66th Avenue
Arthur St. to McKinley St.
28.
Stinson Blvd.
66th Avenue to 66k Avenue
27 -1965
•
29.
Stinson Blvd.
Mississippi St. to 66th Avenue
30. ,
Longfellow Street
East River Rd. to Railroad Tracks
33 -1964
31.
Seat River Rd. East
79th Avenue to Liberty St.
32 -33-34 -1964
Service Drive
32.
Ely Street
Ruth St. to Railroad Tracks
34 -1964
33.
Ruth Street
Liberty St. to Ruth Circle
34 -1964
34.
Liberty Street
East River Rd. to Railroad TrackF
32 -1964
2. That the City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to draw the
preliminary plans and specifications and to tabulate the results of hit
estimates of the costs of said improvements, including every item of
cost from inception to completion and all fees and ezpenseF incurred (or
to be incurred) In connection therewith, or the financing thereof, and
to make a preliminary report of his findings, stating therein vhether
said improvements are feasible and whether they can best be made at pro-
posed, or in connection with some other improvesents (and the estimated
• cost as recommended), including also a description of the lands or area
as may receive benefits therefrom and as may be proposed to be assessed.
Ordering Preliminary Plans
St. 196641 Page 3
. 3. That the City Clerk shall act to ascertain the name and address of the
owner of each parcel of land directly affected or within the area of
lands as may be proposed to be assessed for said impi waments (and each
of these); and upon receipt from said Engineer of the said preliminary
report, calculate estimates of assessments as may be proposed relative
thereto against each of said lands.
4. That said preliminary report of the Ingiueer and estisates of assessments
of the Clerk, shall be furnished to the Council, and made available for
inspection to the owner of any parcel of land as may be affected thereby
at any public hearing held relative thereto, as wall as at any prior time
reasonable and convenient.
ADOPM BY TEN CM CWHCIL OF THE CITY OF F8 MM, THIS
DAY OF . 1965.
U
ATIBM
CM CLUX • Marvin C. Bsunsell
0
WAYOR • William J. Nee
97
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. t
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND EST114ATES Oa THE COSTS
THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMM PROJECT ST. 1966 -2
BE IT RESOLVEDg, by the Council of the City of Fridley as follows:
1. That it appears in the interest of the City and of the property ovaors
affected that there be constructed certain improvements, to -'wit:
Street Improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot -mix bituminous
mat, concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer system and sanitary sewer
services and other facilities, located as follows:
(The petitions received and filed by the City for the improvements are
indicated opposite to the relative street.)
Petition Number
(1) West Moore Lake Dr.
(State Aid No. 302)
(2) West Moore Lake Dr.
(State Aid Ho. 302)
(3) Rice Creek Road
(4) Ashton Avenue
Carol Drive to Baker Avenue
Baker Avenue to T.H. #65
T.S. #65 to Old Central
79th Way to Ironton Street
4 -1965
2. That the City Engineer is hereby authorised and directed to draw the
preliminary plans and specifications and to tabulate the results of his
estimates of the costs of said improvements, including every item of
cost from inception to completion and all fees and expenses incurred (or
to be incurred) in connection therewith, or the financing thereof,.and
to make a preliminary report of his findings, stating therein whether
said improvements are feasible and whether they can best be made as pro -
posed, or in connection with some other improvements (and the estimated
cost as recommended), including also a description of the lands or area
as may receive benefits therefrom and as may be proposed to be assessed.
3.. That the City Clerk shall act to ascertain the name and address of the
owner of each parcel of land directly affected or within the area of
lands as may be proposed to be assessed for said improvements (and each
of them); and upon receipt from said Engineer of the said preliminary
report, calculate estimates of assessments as may be proposed relative
thereto against each of said lands.
4. That said preliminary report of the Engineer and estimates of assessments
of the Clerk, shall be furnished to the Council, and made available for
inspection to the owner of any parcel of land as may be affected thereby
at any public hearing held relative thereto, as well as at any prior time
reasonable and convenient.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TSE CITY OF FRIDLEY, THIS DAY
• OF 1965.
ATTEST: MAYOR - William J. Be*
CITY CLERK - Marvin Cs Brunsell
•
i
Form 2523 (1 -65)
R E S O L U T I O N
99
I
At a (regular) (special) meeting of the C1. MI not the Citg
of Fridley duly held on the day of , 19 , the
following Resolution was offered by
seconded by , ; to -wit:
WHLREAS the Commissioner of Highways has prepared plans, special
provisions and specifications for the improvement of a part of Trunk
Highway Number 156 renumbered as Trunk Highway Number 47
within the corporate limits of the�_CitY of ftV
from the S. Corp. Limits to
53rd Ave. N.E. ; and
WHEREAS said plans are on. file in the office of the Department of
Highways, Saint Paul, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, and identified as
S,P. 0205• -18 & S.P. 226.27 (47 -156) ; and
WHEREAS said special provisions are on file in the office of the
Department of Highways, Saint Paul, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, and
identified as
S.P. 0205••18 & S.P. 2726 -27 (47 -156) tiinn. Proj. F 081•.133)
which, together with the Minnesota Department of Highways Specifications
for Highway Construction, dated January 19 1964, on file in the office of
the Commissioner of Highways, constitute the specifications for said
improvement of Trunk Highway Number 156 renumbered as Trunk Highway
Number 47 ; and
WHEREAS copies of said plans and special provisions as so
marked, labeled and identified are also on file in the office of the
City- _Clerk; and
WHEREAS the term "said plans and special provisions" as herein -
after used in the body of this resolution shall be deemed and intended to
mean, refer to, and incorporate the plans and special provisions in the
foregoing recitals particularly identified and described.
Form 2523
(1 -b5)
JL, 10
NOVI, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions
for the improvement of Trunk Highway Number 1 b____ renumbered as Trunk
Highway Number, ,.7 within the limits of the Ci_„t — of
be and hereby are approved.
BE.IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the elevations and grades as shown
in said plans and special provisions be and they are hereby approved and
consent is hereby given to any and all changes•in grade occasioned by the
construction of said Trunk Highway Number renumbered as Trunk Highway
Number �47 in accordance with said plans and special provisions.
Upon the call of the roll the following voted in
favor of the Resolution
The following voted against its adoption:
whereupon the Mayor and presiding officers declared the Resolution adopted.
Dated , lgz-.
Attest
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF Amm
City _ OF Fridley )
- Mayor
C_ ity— Clerk
I do hereby certify that at a regular meeting (at a special meeting of
which due and legal notice was given) of the Cif Council of Pri-cnAv.
Minnesota, on the _ day of , 19-,r, at which a majority of the
members of said Council were present, the foregoing resolution was adopted.
Given under my hand and seal this day of 19 b�•
Clerk
•
r�
LJ
1.
•
101
PLANNING CM MISSION MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 14, 1965 PAGE 1
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kravik at 7 :34 P.M.
Umbers Presente Johanson, Bendel, Hughes, Kravik
Hoobers Absentp Bergman
Otbers Presents City Eger Wagner, Sng3nolrinM Assistant Clark
lrbtiop by Hogbes, sacmded by DmAel, that the s lautes of the Flaming
GoemdAwlou Meeting of Septambe; 23, 1965 be approved. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried..;
Notion by Bandel, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Ccmrissiaa recOlva
the mfantes of the Parka and Playgrounds Sub - Commutes meting of Septsoba 20,
1965. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried.
- 0M OM I
vAtion by Bandei, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Comissioo re'*1W
ara
the minutes of the Plats and Subdivision Sub- Caittee Ming of October 7,
1965. Upon► a voice vote, all voting aye, the lotion carried.
mime one MM MIA as sae Aveses TR AM fIT11.11 E9 S"R- 0016fi A MMM 7.
Motion by Handel, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Casisalon receive
the minutes of the Streets and Utilities Sub -Co mitee meeting of October 7,
1965. Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, the motion carried.
2be Ppblic Hearing Notice was read by the City Hanager.
Mr. HvM Brooks, reptuentint the Standard Oil CMpany, was there to present
the roming request. Be stated he'would like to explain why they decided to
locate this site for a service station. Traffic studies show that 8i5bMj' #65
is very heavily traveled. T4ere are 25,000 cars per day over this road,
191,000 cars on Highway #100, 4,000 cars turn right and go west on Higimay 100,
2540 turn left and go east on Highway 100. Because of the heavy traffic, it
was felt that this would be a very desirable site for a service station.
Another factor is that the Highway Department has designed the intersection
for heavy traffic.
1104d
n0KNG C0ldvI MION MBBTING MINUTES - OCTOBER 14 � 1965 PACE 2
r• -�rr�i .rwr •. • rr.�rrr.ar�.+�.
He showed a sketch of the station and how it was placed on the"property. The
stalls in the service station would be placed away from the'take. Indirect
lightiag would be installed to eliminate any glare. There would be no spot
lights or flashers.
Mr. travik then asked if anyone wished to make a statement in favor of
rezoning this property. No one spoke for it.
He then asked that those who wished to object to state their name and address.
Willism H. tell, 5675 Jackson Street Northeast, stated that he owned the
property directly in back of the proposed rezoning. He wondered how useb
unore area would he added an to the rezoning, and boar close to Moore Lake
Drive will this be. He did not approve of the station but would lime houses
there.
Mrs. Olive Redman, 5695 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that the noise of the
cars going Into the drive -tp theatre to distracting and was opposed to the
notes. She stated that it is difficult to sell property if there is-a
station across from the house. Also, the insurance rates go up.
Mgrs. Dell Gunderson, 5707 Wont Moore Lake,Drive, Wants homes in this area
because it is a beautiful area, and she is opposed to rezoning.for a service
station.
Thor Peterson, 5725 Jackson Street Northeast, was against any yore filling
stations.saying there were plenty of them in Fridley as it is noir, and he was
definitely opposed to rezoning for another filling station.
Bernard Z. Young, 5751 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that he would not be
able to gat a FU loam and if biz haze were put on the market could not sell
it, and would lose prospective buyers if a filling station were across the
street. He was opposed to the rezoning.
C. 8. StJohn,. 5719 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that when he purchased his
property he understood it was residential and does not want an oil station.
Smgene L. Schaefer, 5731 West Moore Lake Drive, stated he would like'to keep
the area residential and was opposed to the rezoning.
Arthur Olsen, 5771 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that this was an attractive
neighborhood but he did not believe a filling station would help. Moore Lake
Drive is the main artery'to the high school, junior high school and the new
abuarab along with the traffic coming dawn Highway 65 and through the neighbor -
bood.
Ross Haidle, 5714 West Moore Lake Drive, was very definitely against the
rezoning.
1, L. Steenerson, 5724 best Moore Lake Drive, definitely opposed to the
resootog' 1
Mr. Dell Gubderson, 5707 West Moore Lake Drive, opposed to the resoning.
L. V.- Piepho, 3725 Jacks= Street, opposed to the razoaing.
PLANNT14G CO1+RlISSIOU MMTING MINUTES - OCTOBER 14, 1965 PACE 3
. The Conodesion felt that as a result of the new,-Highway 694, and ttxe change
there, the existing zoning of sores of this lased which has been taken over
by the highway, has chopped it up. The Planning Commission has tried to
look at the change as an overall problem in a particular area. The drive -in
theatre will probably remain there only indefinitely. 'mere is a little
strip of land between the drive -in theatre and to the north, one hundred
feet wide from 7th Street to Quincy. They are of the opinion that use,
other than ghat is presently permitted the way the property is zoned now,
would be questionable until the development of all the vacant property
and the property that will change in a relatively abort time. They feel
this to somewhat contrary to the policy that they have tried to establish
the last few years in not acting upon a small parcel itself without regard
to the property that is yet to be developed in the neighborhood, and feel
It would be creating more problems than it would resolve.
20
Lotion by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, that the Planning Commission close
the Public Hearing of the rezoning ZOA #65 -06 Standard Oil Company being
part of Lot 5, Block 5, Doanay's Lakeview Manor, rezoning from R -1 (single
family dwelling) to C -1 (local business areas), and recommend to the Council
to deny the request for the rezoning. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
the motion carried.
07 CARLSON &
• Mr. Eric LaVine was present. He stated that because of the assessments he
felt it necessary to rezone this land in order to make use of it.
3.
A map showing the whole unplatted area was studies and it was felt that
this piece would not have any effect on the balance of the land.
A discussion of the street pattern was shade, and reference to the letter
that W. Hodne wrote. It was agreed that the building layout was compatible
with the area.
Motion by Johnason, seconded by Bandel, that the Public Hearing of the
rezoning ZOA #65 -07, Carlson and LaVine, portion of proposed plat of Sylvan
Hills Plat 8, be closed and that the Planning Commission recomsend to Council
the zoning request calling the attention of the Council to the last paragraph
of Mr. ft4ft 9a letter of August 26th regarding rezoning the area to R -3A.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried.
Motion by Bendel, seconded by Hughes, that the Public Hearing of the proposed
preliminary plat, P.S. #65 -01 Carlson & LaVoae, Lot 16 -27, Block 9, Lowell
Addition to Fridley Park and part of facated alley in Block 9, and Lots 22 -27,
Block 8 and part of vacated Main Street be closed, and that the Planning
Commtsston recommend approval of this preliminary plat to Council, making note
that Starlight Boulevard be changed to Mercury Drive on the final plat. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried.
103
104
PidWNING 2M.01881W MW =G MINUTES - OCTOBER 14 1965 PAGE A
• 4. C0MM PUBLIC ERAR NG1 PBSZMNM PLAT (E. S. #65.03 9 S. G. PJURSW
COMPANY INCt PSARM 8 INDUSTRIAL PARR. TEAT PART Og THS OF THE an
AND THE Rk OF THE OF SECTION 3 WING WEST OR . THE G13 RA 55AD x W AND
EAST OF. EAST RIVER ROAD.
5.
There was no one present representing the plat, but Mr. James Pearson left
a plat shoring the road as it was planned by Anoka County in conjunction
with the Pearson Company. The Committee discussed it and decided that the
Streets and Utilities Sub - Committee and the Safety Committee should review it.
Motion by Hughes, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Commission refer
the new road pattern as shown by the drawing presented by the S. G. Pearson
Com�raan�t at this meeting, for the service drive of the preliminary plat,
Pearson's Industrial Plat, to the Streets and Utilities Sub - Committee mad
the Safety Comsittee for their opinion. On a voice vote, all voting aye,
the motion carried.
Mr. Bandel explained the action of the Plats sad Sub - Division Sub - Committee
on this item and Mr. Falk was instructed that he should get certificates of
survey for each proposed iot, and that there would be four certificates,
one for each lot and one to shop the whole parcel as split up.
• Motion by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, that the Manning Comission concur
with the Plats and Sub - Division and Streets and Utilities Sub - Committees,
and recommend to Council the Lot Split L.S. #65 -12, Balk Construction
Company, Inc., Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision #129, to be split into three
lots 86 feet vide as shows► on the drawing presented by the requester, with
a dedication of 25 feet on the south edge for a future road, and a 6 foot
easement be granted on the vesterly boundary of this parcel for utilities
and drainage. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried.
6.
7.
Mr. Vernon Larson was present. He stated three plaits had been drawn up for
this parcel, but they had not been checked with his developer in time for
this meeting.
Motion by Johanson, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission continue
until the next meeting the Lot Split #65 -10 Veracm R. Larson, being the east
213 feet of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision #129 together with easement over
north 30 feet of Lot 14, lying vest of the east 273 foot. Upon a voice-vote,
all voting aye, the emotion carried.
S. #65 -11
• There was no one present for this item.
Mr. Bandel explained the action taken by the Plats and Subdivisions Sub -
Committee on October 7, 1965.
106
PLANNING CCHNISSION MUMS - OCTOBER 14, 1965 PAGE 5
• notion by Johanson, seconded by
with the Plate and Subdivision
approval of the Lot Split L.S.
through 15, Block 2, Hyde Paris
aye, the motion carried.
a.
9.
Bandel, that the Planning Commission concur
Subdivision* Sub - Committee and recomeend'to Council
#65 -11, Smith and Anderson, Inc., Lots 13,
Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting
Motion by Haghes, seconded by Dandel that action on the Special Use Pendt
ropest for a nursing hours, Parcel 2400, Winsow & Associates, Inc., being
the 1% of Section 11, be withheld until Winslow & Associates, Inc. provide
the Plaum►ing Commission with its plans fen the entire 11 acre tract west
of Unity Hospital. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried.
1
Motion by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, that the item of a Special Use Permit
for a nursing home on Outlot 1, Melody Manor, Mike Hafner, has been approved
by the Planning Commission after several years of study, and that the
Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Appeals proceed in the
usual manner. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, with member Hughes
abstaining. The motion carried.
• 10. VACATTtBi OF E T1 LM 11 BLOCK 4 BROORVIEW 28MRA(� SECOND ADDMON-3
Motion by Johanson, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission recommend
to the City Council that the Crest 2 feet of the six foot easement on the
east line of Lot 11, Block 4, Brookview Terrace, 2nd Addition be vacated,
provided Northern States Power Company and Nortbwestern Bell Telephone Company
release the two feet. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried.
In the discussion that followed the Planning Commission stated they felt they
would like to get back onto the schedule of having the discussion meeting the
second meeting of the month. The next meeting October 28, 1965 would be such
a meeting. At that time the CR-1 Ordinance and the balance of the ordinance
would be discussed. It was stated that the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment
Authority would probably give a
presentation at the neat westing.
There being no further business, Chairman Kravtk adjourned the meeting at
10;00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
naael Of Brian
• Recording Secretary
HODNE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS /PLANNERS
1320A Fourth Street' Southeast'.', Miaaespolis idinnesota 66414. 881.9818
26 August 1965
The Planning Commis,gion. .
City of Fridley, MinnF7sota '•".
Attention: Mr. Kenneth Kravik, Chairman
Re: Levine request for re- zoning
to multiple family in
City Center planning Area
Commission No. 6553 - Technical Assistance
Gentlemen: j
Pursuant to a previous request, we submit to you the following in regard to r
the above subject:
1. The City Center plan to date. recorrAnends that the Levine property
north of Mercury Drive, west of 2nd Street N. E. (continued) be used
for multiple family (R3) residences and parking for future commer-
cial expansion.
2. The Plan also suggests Starlite Boulevard be extended westward to
the to the railroad (along Mercury Drive) then north to Mississippi.
Avenue. This road would serve as an outlet for the neighborhood to
Mississippi Avenue and yet not entice "through" traffic into the ;
neighborhood.
3. The Plan suggests further a building layout that would be compatible
with the area.
In summary, it is our recommendation that the land north of Mercury Drive
(extended north as appropriate for siting purposes) be re -zoned to an R3 use
provided a site development and preliminary architectural plans are submitted
showing the total. development which Mr. Levine has in mind. • We also suggest '
the "design" qualities of the buildings be improved above.the present structures.
and that site amenities (landscaping in particular).be shown*,'-',
Respectfully submitted,
t •
• (,v�DNE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS /PLANNERS
YJ�
1homas H. Hodne, AIA, Assoc. AIP
816
222 Main Street G'Falena, nuilois 61086 /777 -1683
I
r'
0
M
f
b
c
a
t-
} �J
to
Z.
N
Of
107
o,l
Q
b�
N
w � O
O
IC
9 G
ITa
n
o
O
�
p
tTt
f1 -
a
r
I
V
0'
r
r�
107
o,l
Q
b�
N
w � O
O
IC
9 G
ITa
n
�1
o
�
Z
tTt
f1 -
a
i
V
0'
c
�
M!
�1
i
Lot Split #65 -12
Q
C D D L . 1, A. S.. #129 - Seca 12
Q G:y Falk Constr. inc..
5900 Main Street N.E. •.
53912.
• A r CORNEA '=
SEC. /Z - t
►� - " SL PAUL - - JJJ. e!'- ssJ.,,: - =.*..7
OAOi N.E.
• � �� " t yq fq ar
x:
I:
i I •f IM.N 0, MAIO / J
le
k Cr
R
! mgf. gv uy Fiir:
I
m
ftm
J 71
' Jiwinlrf /w� JVwwr /1 C q
_4 <. 1.9jk IF'S �` • . of J.QA as I
/f S ,
JF
I .!j ! /6 �•. M.,
WG.Ie�e ../ �r �i_ __ ._ .r Z
.F•rfA SS /'d N/►•/1I MfM . $ v I Zv I ,
,.... _ /
333 6 '
• �,._ �`� •x� t� Erb,_ 5 z 0
'C d 4 � I gat
FIR'
T D ` . , J/� .. j , /.
J10 01 if VE.
� 2 •
13 5
Oval-
I
(aw W e
DIVE: 10
wfi+
t E roM (nyI reg1 r<a) . 7 Z 7 ^ L)
a� ii
T `W i B
NONOAGA (74 r.y AVENUE IV. X.) ST
�.J .. ... ... .., e r r
'J f 33 0. 19 �, 7
r• ` f • 4149 w p t • r.
22 2a` 261, 28'
33 NO 108
Aq
t
, ., w.
41 ;^�r <« � , , � 30 � X32 • • ' r� � ;
x.
F /. i ` tsar ca/i pI /Jao) /er.) G�ni �
+� y e / r.✓� Ti
£17i ` �!' L��yJwL 4 t [i:!:`1• r"A ewj
0
PAW AND PLAYGROUNDS go-COWMTTEE METING MINUM - SEPnM= 20, 1965
The :stating was called to order at 8 :30 P. M. by Chairman Hughes at the
City Hall.
XSBS PBRSUT: Hughes, Cochran, Skjarvold
08383 PIMSBNT: Dana Jackson, League of Women Voters
Paul Brawn, Parks and Recreation Director
The minutes of the meeting of July 19, 1965 were approved as received.
The minutes of the meting of September 2, 1965 were approved as reseived.
OLD BUSINESS
1.
2.
MW OF SEPTEBER 2, ,1965„i
A ;memo of September 2, 1965 from Hodne & Associates was received by
the -Committee. Copies have been previously mailed as per the Bodne
request.
'ltie redraft of the proposed ordinance for the creation of a Joint
Committee for Parks and Recreation was read.
3. HOCKEY RINKS:
The water for the hockey rinks on the Commons will come from the hydrant
on 61st for this winter. The Jaycees will donate a garage as a wandAg
house on the Commons. The hockey rink will fall capon school property.
This has been approved by the school. The City will have full control
of the facilities. There will be a warming house attendant on duty:
4. BIDS FOR LOCXE PARK TREE REMOVAL:
Qum bid has been received out o six contacted. Other bids are expected
withlu a short period of tine.
5. TENNIS COURTS AT THE CONKONS:
Tennis courts will be brought up at the Council Meeting of September 20,
1965 as they were in the 1965 budget. The tennis court proposal had
been tabled through a misunderstanding. The money was appropriated for
the tennis courts in the 1965 budget.
6. LrOCIE. PARR TREE R AL:
MOTION by Cochran. Seconded by Skjervold. That the committee extend
thanks and commendation to the Jaycees of the City of Fridley for their
fine work in Locke Park cleaning up and in tree removal after our recent
storm. MOTION CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
B&CGIN REPORT:
1.. PARR SIGNSi
Park signs will be green and white and :taw signs will be erected at
Locke, 8ackmau and Flannery.
PASIM AND PLAYGROUNDS SUB•CWHITTEE MINMS, SEP7MWR 20, 1965 P ®GM 2
MM(W by Skjervold. Seconded by Cochran. 'ghat, hereafter, the park coa
Hackman Circle will be known as- Hackman Parke MOT ON CARRIED.
Ifce Brown will contacts Mrs.. Jedrsejewski regarding the naming of the
park at 2nd and Main - street Northeast $n memorial to her late husband
the Dr. Jay Jedrsejevek1.
The Comiaittee members should consider names for the park at Craigway
for the next meeting;
2e a1TLS OF SKATINGG M FOR .-1965.1966 SEASON
See the moms of September 20, 1965. No information, has, as yet, been
received on the ict-shaver through the American Legion Bost in Fridley.
3p WALL DRILLING ON PSOPLRTYs
W611L houses will not interfere with the park activity on the Come=&.
4a. MUD 2MMLG ON MW LAMBS
Taw & M Dredging - Company of Fridley will use the Moore Lake Beach ae
a test area. They dill suit and dredge at a cost basis. The coat will
be $2.75 per front foot for a total of $$25:00. This work will not
noticeably affect the depth of Moore Lake.
HUGHEB SSPORTs
1. VEHICLES:
Mr. 8mva will determine feasibility of purchasing a nee truck now to
Lase for the beginning of the skating season. The trucks wbich-we now
have are in very bad condition.
2. FXLL FROM CITY DUMP FM TaMADth
`�3$.'SdY.�.TL'95%^''.''•R!P ..•31 T.':552.G � .GRP
strongly recoe�smend tti8t ao dvmpiag of refuse be alloved on the
park property of the City of Fridley as this old detract frog the
visibility, of the land from the standpoint, of even normal park
installations, such as backstops, fences, light poles and play equip -
ment. Further, from the standpoint of Locke Park, this would further
encroach upon the anspolled areas of the park.
3. NORTRUST CORN A CW aL JM:
IF Ta —milt plan to �vel Cbil ortheast corner of Moore Lake and clean
fill would be appreciated. -Mr. Brawn will contact the 8aginelriag
Department regarding fill and -will inspect the area and make sec --- - 6ations.
4. MOOS TAKE BEACH:
Mr. Brown Will c6pile a recss `o the water counts for the past two
years.
• 5. . Ja s
m ry has Informed to that the Flannery Lairs will donate
$900.00 to be used for park equipment to be used in Flannery Park;
It to reeosseended that we aceept with thanks asd that this money be
placed in the gift fund sad set 'aside for the purpose specified by the
Flannery heirra.
PANS AND PLAYGROUNDS SOB -C 1lIT= M:ENUTES s SEA 20, 1965 PACE 3
0
6. GOUM VAMY GABDSN CLUB:
We accept with thanks the donation of $100.00 from the Golden Valley
Garden Club for the tree replacement in Locke Pack. The Committee will
forward a letter of thanks.
7. C t �1►11V%�1T$„al!i`_P8t1�i F3AI�TCE DPABIYT CONGSSI�TIRtG I3EVELOPM$NT AT Cl1PZZbL
fltlG_ ffi:S o
XMQ i by Sk jervold. Seconded by Cochran. That the . City Council waive
delinquent special asaeestents on Lots 2 and 3, Block 8 and Lot 17,
Block 6 all in Cartoon's Summit Manor South Addition. MO't OU CABBIBD.
8.
WORK PROGRESS REPORT - SSA: M. BROWN:
Mr.. Brass submitted a report caaceralug work to be done, work being dune,
and work finished. We will retain a crew as long as work remains !unfinished.
The Committee thanks Mr. Brawn for his report on the progress of the park
crew.
6D_. 3_0, t�tTs
The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
0
Christian K. Skervold
Secretary to the Sub- Conmdttes
0
0
0
0
CXTT Or , Kmmou
OPPICR OIL WI&DYHG INSPECTOR
TOMCY NOWMT REPORT T'O CITY MANAGER
SEPTEMBER, 1965
XMIR Or PZMTS ISSO W
Residential
Residential Garages
Alterations i Additions
Multiple Dwellings
Commercial
industrial
Municipal
Churches i Schools
Hospitals
Signs
Moving
SSSIM4,'!8D AAWATIMS OW BUILDING PERMITS IS80107
$ 219,500
1965
1964
THIS YEAR
LAST YEAR
TYPE OF COSSTRUCTIOH
SzPT9MBER
SEPTEMBER
TO DATE
TO DATE
Residential
12
19,500
127
184
Residential Garages
17
22
118
91
Alterations 8 Additions
32
7
844
38
Multiple Dwellings
1
0
2
45
Commercial
4
0
12
3
industrial
1
1
1
7
Municipal
0
0
1
0
Churches b Schools
1
0
2
3
Hospitals
0
0
1
0
Signs
10
2
35
13
Moving
0
0
3
1
8
43
I'la
3183
OrRSRS
Heating
42
40
355
329
Plumbing
64
38
369
304
Electrical
108
48
854
430
I
i2fi
1,378
10W
Residential
Residential Garages
Alterations i Additions
Multiple Dwellings
Commercial
industrial
Municipal
Churches i Schools
Hospitals
Signs
Moving
SSSIM4,'!8D AAWATIMS OW BUILDING PERMITS IS80107
$ 219,500
188,500
$ 2,255,570
3,047,785
25,180
36,762
171,039
139,497
227,024.
8,630
80242,339
59,750
19,500
a0-
46,500
10396,000
130,000 7P0
tlOm
$20,788
835.000
2000,000
75,000
200.000
568,000
rOo
-0-
14,500
ow
1,200,000
n0-
1,257,993
"1,320
•0®
-Om
29000,000
=Om
5,875
2,000
27,950
59130
yo.
o0-
20,300
•00
f2, 7.867
310,892
;15, 7,18 1
6,112,U2
C]
0
0
REPORT TO CITY MAULER
SBPTEIWER, 1965
IItMMiER (W LiC NSBS C URROMY IN tPFECT
AND
LICENSE PEES COLaCTED TO DATE
TYPE NIRrffiER P88S 2g.LEC1ED
E WCCMCAL
74
11110
EMVAT=rp
27
405
GAS
43
645
GffiliMAL
277
6,925
HEAT=G
62
930
H00SE M0vuc
3
45
MASOMY
32
480
OIL HEATING
6
90
PLASTERMG
19
285
PLUMMS
72
1,080
G
10
150
slow
15
225
WEM DRIILi =G
2
30
600
642
$11,400
PERMIT FEES
, 7.w 7ws,..ry rr• ,
1965
1964
THIS YEAR
LAST MR
PEDW SIRS
TYPE
SEPMSU
SEPTIIDER
TO VATIC
TO DAIS
#0424 -#8541
10 =1110
$ 3,381
708
$170577
$10,564
#SS02=0609
MXCIW AL
11505
903
10,929
7,0790
#335043391
HEATIMG
505
718
4,819
5,344
#380043843
PLUMM
563
600
6,147
4,904
SIMS
55
9
194
57
, 7.w 7ws,..ry rr• ,
0 N O R T H E R N S T A T E S P O W E R C O M P A N Y
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 88402
October 6, 1965
Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Minneapolis 21, Minnesota
I-
Dear Sir:
-- - - - 1 -175 Watt Overhead Lamps Installed 10/4165
Cul -De -Sac at end of 69th Ave. East of
University Ave. N.E.
Yours very truly,
Rudolph, 4uperlisor
JER /PMCA:jmh Municipal Services
0 N O R T H E R N S T A T E S POWER C O M P A N Y
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
September 29, 1965
Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Minneapolis 21, Minnesota
Dear Sir:
1 -6,000 Lumen Overhead Lamp Installed 9/16/65
On Lynde Drive bet. Fillmore St. & Regis Drive
Yours very truly,
Rudolph, Supeivisor
JER /PMCA:jmh Municipal Services
I
ViUCER 1WROVD-FENT PROJECT 75-(
3 XG RESERVOIR
nZID-upy, mmmmsom
46
B X D OPENING OU-01""TOBER 113 1965 AT 12-00 80071
BID SURETY
LLT14P SUM BID
C014PLE TION TI-LgE
41.
Acton Construction Co., Inc.
1871 Weot County Road "C"
k 7-?
Minucapolis, Minnesota 55420
magney Construction Co.
20 Saady Oa!-, Road
7,
Hopkins, Minnesota
Pateroon-Tcuiplin, Inc.
6402 Baas Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
C>
41tar
D. Giartsen Co.
3-501 Xenwood
7/6
Minneapolis, 14innevota 55416
Watson Construction Co.
500 Loring Bldg.-1409 Willow St.
j
';�(/
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
C. S. mccrossana, Itc.
R.R. 2 Box 322
Bea-r Avemv--.
7
7�7
st, Paul,
St. 1
inae'oota 55416
B
-y uildoro, Inc.
7" -'142-0 Douglas D-.ivc
N10-Ineapolis, Minnesota 55429
C) c 'e-r
47
PROJECT 75-C
('SCREDULE 1)
39 IN107 RESE'RVOIR
FRIDLEY, 1411RIir-S�,7�TA
DID OPENXNG ON OCTOBER 112 1965 W 112100 Iii' U'
PAGE 2
K]
BID SURETY
LUMP SUM BID
COMPLETION rLiIME
Gunnar I. Johnson & Son, Inc.
9320 3amce Avenue,, So.
Minneapolis, Minnesotai 55431
/G'(
K]
I
C/3
r4
t-4 0
r4
O
ii
IZ
Ci
b-4
of
cn
cn
P
Ln
tn
cn
w
*a 0
41
in
&n
tn
t;
a
1.4
4) o-4 C9)
U CQ 0)
0
• to
zi cs
co 41
ad
Al
CD
co a
w
41
a
. 1
0
a 0
0 t4o
41
N 0
co
0
53 C4 al"i
co C4 0
ej
9
to
%a 4)
ci Cft
0 No
to Cfl Q
co W
Q
a
a; 0
Aj -A
0
At
N Ln
0 m 9:
b QD C9
0 rq •
4► ca
co
0 go
vi 0
$4 0 0
0 PO -ri
U "
:3 cl -A
to r-I
4)
M
�
0 CA
0
0 N
64 aj
1010 0
u
0 "
w co
0
ca 0
4J
a
14
G3 ej 0
92 0 0
ci Ci G
0
cto C4
W 41
4,4
t3
S4 0
$4 f:4 GL!
c: fa
0 a 0
'm td Cl
V)
16 ofs
te, w
4j tit
Efj
C3 rj •4
V4 r4 0
C)
p
CN
-4;
U-)
ne.
W CJ
sl
14
lie
413
Q,
fz
�
I�
1�4
kl
CA
vq
ul
LA
• co
4j
0 0 0
0
rn
U-)
tz VI
C7
u't
$4
p
H to
41
41
9.
-W-4 (d
0
CJ izi 47
O
93
in 0
4
0
4j 4j
G 0
0-1
C3
m " 4
1 X
go 0
p
1
ai
P4
P-4
4
-a
0)
.0 V N-4
:1 w =
41
ri
0
In co
V- P4
!
o Q -
:4
1
$4
(1)
04 0
04 -
U
-v4
tj lr�
tn
C-1 �:6
V-4
• :3 ,
• $4 N fn
�-,,
Q7 to C3
C4 1
"rr
(Z
:zr
P-a
43
m
114 C-1