11/01/1965 - 5940I
ROLi. CALLi
: Regular Meeting, October 18, 1965. Pages 1 — 28.
,PUBLIC �►�tT*�S:
1. On Rezoning - R -1 to CR -1 - Portion Outlot 1,
Melody Manor 4th Additions Pages 29 - 310
A. Request for Lot Split, Pages 32 no 340
2. on Franchise t dinaace - American Oil Coupany, Pages 35 - 380
I.,, =MAI :
3. Change Order #1 - SW&SS#73A AND SS#73a Pages 39 & 40.
4. Change Order #1 - SW#70, Pages 41 & 420
S. Sign Application - Haaard Jahnsson, Page 43.
6. Resolution Receiving Preliminaxy Plans and
Specifications and Calling a Public Hearing -
Streets 1966.10 1[1 / Pages 44 - 470
7. Resolution Receiving Preliminary Plans and
Specifications and Calling a Public Hearing -
Streets 1966 -2, 3 Pages 48 - 500
8. Resolution Ordering Improvement and Final Plans
and Speeificatioans - SW&SS#7380 I Page $1.
I�
RROULAR COUNCIL FETING AGENDA - N0VZM= 1, 1965 -. C NGOWS
I. ON RRZONING = R -1 TO cat -1 - PoRTIOR OUTLOT 1e MLODY MANOR 4TH
ADDITIOVs The notice of Hewing is on-Page 29, and the ordinance
for first reading, if you so desiree is on Page 30. A drawing
of the location is on Page 31.
Ao REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT4 The request is on Page 32e an ex-
coxpt of the Planning Commission minutes is an Page 33,
and the certificate of survey of the piece described is
on Page 34. This is the same piece located on the map on
Page 31.
2* (if PPJW RISE ORDINANCE - AFRICAN OIL COMANYa The Notice of
Hearing is on Page 35, and the ordinance is on Pages 36 through
38o If I read the footnote of they City Attorney on Page 38
correctly, this ordinance could not be read until 20 days after
the public hearing, if you decided to pass it.
NBW BUSMSSS
3. MAHM a&=R #1 - SW&SS#73A AND SS#73: This change order on
Pages 39 and 40 has been discussed previously by the Councils
and would expedito construction in Don °s 5th Addition.
4. C WW(X cpj= #1 - SW#70a This change order on Pages 41 and 42
has been previously discussed by the Council, and would expedite
the construction on the west side of East River Road just south
of Mississippi Place* This was a petition of Welter Luckowv
So SIGN APPLICATION - HOWARD JOWSONs The sign application is an
Page 43,s and is for the Ho;6.jaz�d Johnson Restaurant previously
approved.
6. RESOLUPI(X RECEIVING PRELIi LrsRY PLANS AND SpECI_ FICATIOns AND
CALLING FOR A PIMLIC HEARING - STREETS 1966 -1s The resolution
is an Page 44, and the Notice of Hearing is on Pages 45 through
47. The hearing would be held on November 15, 1965a
7o RBSOLUTIOU RZC 31VI8G PRELIMINARY PLANS AND SPBMICATICNS AND
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING - STRZZTS 1966 -2: The resolution
is can Page 48# and the Notice of Hearing is on Pages 49 and 50.
•
So RESOLUTUN ORIISRING ZNPROVRHIII W AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS -
SW&SS#73B: The resolution is an Page 51 a .
0
'S
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
• A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order
by Mayor Nee at 8.05 P.M.
ROLL CALL
MLMBERS PRESENT, Nee, Kirkham, Sheridan, Wright
HOMERS ABSENT% Thompson
APPROVAL OF MINiTI , RI ULAR, COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 4, 1965,_
Motion by Sheridan to adopt the minutes of the regular Council Meeting of
October 4, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC EXAMINER - REQUEST FOR STUDY OF CITY_POUCIBS:
Mayor Nee stated that In regard to the questions recently raised in the
newspapers concerning the propriety of the use of City facilities by outside
groups for non -City purposes, the Mayor has discussed this question with the
Public Examiner and asked the Public Examiner if he would be amenable to
making a study of this question for the City. The Public Examiner stated
that he would be willing to examine these policies if the City so desires.
The Mayor stated that he asked the City Manager to report concerning the
present policies which the City follows in letting other groups use the
City facilities for non -City purposes. The Mayor stated that he believes
the discussion with the Public Examiner was made under his obligations to
the City as delineated by the City Charter.
The City Manager stated that he did some research of the records in regard
to the use by all non -City groups of the facilities including the use of
City parks and the use of the Council meeting room in City Hall. The City
Manager stated that it has been the policy to permit the use of City facili-
ties by civic groups. The use of the facilities by non -civic groups or
unorganized groups is permitted only when some Councilman would vouch for
and would take responsibility for the group. The City Manager stated that
often the cost to the City for letting other groups use the City facilities,
such as a meeting room in.City Ball, is minimal amounting to the cost of
electric lighting and janitorial services. The City Manager stated that
he had the City Clerk write a memo summarizing the uses of the City facilities
by.other groups. The City Manager presented copies of this now to the
Council.
The City Manager asked the Council to establish a policy that the Administration
could follow in the use of City equipment and facilities by outside groups
for non -City purposes. The City Manager stated that an example of each a
use is a -request from one of the executive memabare of the League of Women
Voters to reproduce a stencil made by the League of Women Voters. The
Manager said that such use generally does not conflict with the use of this
equipment by the City employees, and that some of this equipment to not
• available elsewhere in the City of Fridley to these groups. Another
example of the use of the City equipment by non -City employees is the use
of the Xerox machine. The 8erax machine is the only one of its kind in the
MINUT9S OF OCTOBER. 18, 1965 PAGE 2
• City of Fridley, and the City normally has charged for copies made on the
Xerox machine to anyone requesting such copies. The City Manager stated
that it is difficult to determine the impartiality of any reports which
might be duplicated by means of City equipment, and he did not feel it
would be vise to ask a City employee to attempt to determine the impartiality
since it would take considerable time to study all the written material
which some of these groups wish to reproduce.
The City Manager stated that he has kept a record since 1963 of the use of
the Council, meeting room by non -City groups. He stated that the groups
that used the Coemcil meeting room the most were the "Footlighters" and the
Fridley Tax Study Group. The Republican Party Executive Committee has used
the facilities four ties, a DFI, committee has used the facilities once,
the league of Women Voters has held a few meetings at City Hall, St. Williams
Cath lic Church ushers have used the City facilities as well as the Junior
Cher of Commerce. The City Manager stated that it was not the intent
of the Administration or any member of the Administration to Permit an
improper use of City equipment or facilities. He stated that one example of
the difficulty of determining whether the use requested for the City facili-
ties is proper is the recent request by the Chamber of Commerce for use of
the Xerox machine to duplicate a report on Urban Renewal. He stated that
It would be extremely difficult to determin% with any less than a thorough
study of the report, just how impartial and non - political such a report is.
The City Manager suggested that the Council ask the Public Examiner to
• investigate the use of City equipment and facilities by these various non-
City groups, and advise the Council what policy should be set to govern the
use of City facilities. The City Manager stated that he would hate to turn
down a request fr= the Heart Fund Organization or the League of Women
Voters to use the City equipment and facilities. He stated that he did
not believe the City would Irish to discourage the use of City parks by
church groups in the City of Fridley.
Mayor Nee said that the information he received from the Public Examiner
was that the City could either request the Public Examiner to audit all of
the City�s books and services or wake a specific request to the Public
Examiner to investigate this question. The Mayor stated that the costs
would run to $50 a day for each examiner, and the cost to have a Public
Examiner audit all the City "s services would be considerable.
Mayon Nee asked the City Manager to drag a statement of all the past uses of
City facilities by non -City groups in so far as he could do so. The City
Manager stated that the City keeps a record of the use of the Xerox machine
but not of the mimeograph or addressograph machines. He stated that he could
ask the employees of City Hall to report, in so far as they are able to
remember, the use of this equipment by non -City Groups. The City Manager
stated that all the City employees would be happy to cooperate in such an
exanivation.
The mayor pointed out that the school board has established charges for the
use of school facilities by non - school groups. He stated that a question
• exists whether the fee covers the cost or whether it more than covers the
cost.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PAGE 3
• Motion by Wright that the Council first approve the action of the Mayor
in contacting the Public Examiner, secondly, receive the report of the
City Manager in regard to the question before us, and thirdly, to request
the Public Examiners office to study all practices relating to the use
of City Hall and City equipment and facilities by private groups and
organizations in order for the Council to establish an official policy.
Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HSARLNG
MWING -C-23 AND M -1 TOVv3A - CARLSON - LaVINEt
The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing.
The Mayor pointed out the area concerned by the proposed rezoning on the
soap for the benefit of the visitors present at the Council Meeting. The
Mayor asked whether anyone wished to be heard upon this question. There
were no comments or questions concerning the proposed rezoning.
Mayor Nee declared the hearing closed.
ZW MIADING OF ORDINANCE ANWING ZONING DZSTBICTSt
Motion by Wright to adopt upon first reading the ordinance to rezone the
V% of the Sft of Section 14, and that part of the E4 of the SEA of Section
• 15 in Township 30, Range 24, Aaka County and to waive the first reading
of the Ordinance. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a roll . call vote, there
being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC IB3ART C
F'iNALrPLAT - SYLVAN jgL=PLAT 8s
The Mayor read the Notice of Hearing.
Mayor Nee asked whether anyone present vished to be beard concerning the
final plat of Sylvan Hills Plat S. No one present had any questions or
eats concerning the final plat. Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer
whether he had a copy of the final plat. The City Engineer stated that a
copy was delivered to City Hall, but it was pidcsd up to correct the street
=tae given on the plat. Councilman fright suggested that rather than
extending Starlight Boulevard to Mississippi Street, a cul -de -sac be
established at the end of Starlight Boulevard north of Satelite Lane.
Mayor Nee declared the hearing closed.
Motion by Sheridan to accept the final plat of Sylvan Hills Plat S. Seconded
'by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
•
Du uru v� L"CaM u r
TABLED 10/4165) s
Mayor Nee asked the City Manager whether he received any plans of the
proposed building request of Mr. Marchiafava. The City Manager stated that
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PAGE 4
• he discussed this request with Mr. Marchisfava, but that Mr. Marchiafava did
not appear to understand the need to submit plans for the building. He
asked Councilman Wright whether he had been able to discuss this with
Mr. Marchiafava. Councilman Wright stated that Mr. Marchiafava did not
call him, and he was unable to locate Mr. Marchiafava.
Motion by Sheridan to table the request of Mr. Marchiafava for a Building
Permit until such time as the Council has the necessary information to be
able to consider his request. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
ESTIMATE - SMIIEY AND ASSOCIATES (TABLED 9(20165, 1014165):
The City Manager stated that the City Attorney addressed a letter to the
Finance Director and the City Manager read this letter to the Council. The
letter stated, in effect, that the Architect is entitled to be reimbursed
for the cost of duplicating specifications and making blueprints of the
plans.
Motion by Wright to approve the estimate of Smiley and Associates of
October 1, 1965 for reproduction of specifications and plans for payment
In the amount of $1,617.64. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
• The City Manager stated that he had not received information from the City
Manager of Columbia Heights concerning the action by Columbia Heights on
these agreements. Councilman Wright stated that he had conversation with
the Mayor of Columbia Heights, and would like to report concerning this
conversation. Councilman Wright stated that the Mayor of Columbia Heights
agreed that it is inevitable that this project would have to be constructed
at some time. He stated that Columbia Heights is concerned since the
estimates given to Columbia Heights for the cost of construction were below
the actual bids received for the construction, whereas, the bids for the
Fridley portion were below the estimates given to the City of Fridley for
the construction. The City of Columbia Heights has available to it, the
bond monies based upon the maxivaum estimate which the City of Columbia
Heights received for the cost of construction, but this amount does not
cover the share of Columbia Heights for the construction, and it is necessary
for Columbia Heights to put special assessments upon the property in order
to fund the remaining costs.
Mayor Nee asked the City Manager what time the City has to accept bids for
88 #12. The City Manager stated that the City could accept the bids up
until November 10th. Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney what could be done
to achieve an agreement with Columbia Heights on this project. The City
Attorney answered that what could be done depends upon the Public Hearing
being held in Columbia Heights concerning the special assessments necessary
to pay for part of the project. The City Attorney suggested that consideration
• of the agreements could be left until later in the agenda, that the Council
could approve the contracts and authorize the Administration to sign same
providing Columbia Heights also approves the contracts.
The Cite Attorney stated that he has begun condemnation proceedings for
the easements n"dted for construction of SS #12.
IiINMS OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PAM 5
16 PROPOSED AM24*=T TO CHAP= 56 - SIGNS TASTED 8116/65 9/20/65 10/4165)_-.
Mayor Neap stated that he received a request from the Chamber of Commmerce to
table consideration of the proposed amendment to Chapter 56 until the
regular Council Meeting of November 1, 1965. The City Manager reported
that he did not place the hand bill ordinance on the agenda, since he has
beard nothing from the Chamer of Commerce or other groups concerning the
hand bill ordinance.
Notion by Wright to table to the regular Council Meeting of November 1, 1965
coo wlAeratiou of the proposed amreadvent to Chapter 56 - Signs. Seconded
by Kirkham. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unan1 mously.
Lei -
The Mayor stated that this ordinance is rather long and if there Were no
objections he would not ask the City Manager to read the Ordinance. The
City Manager explained that the Ordinance provides for the membership of
a joint Parks and Recreation Commission, representation of the recreation
function to the Council through the City Manager, representation of the
Parks function of the Commission to the Planning Commission, and, thence,
to the Council.
Councilman Wright stated that he would urge the Council to adopt the
. Ordinance. He stated that the Ordinance has been approved by both casmittees
separately and together.
Councilman Shattlan stated that there was a question in his mind whether
the structure of the combined group would be weighted towards either Parks
or the Recreation Commission. He stated that if it were found to be so the
Ordinance could always be amended to correct such a situation. Councilman
Wright stated that he believes the combined group would provide more
coordination than the City had before the Parks and Recreation Director
was hired. He stated that if it turns out that the Commission is weighted
more toward Parks or towards Recreation than it should be, this could be
changed by changing the membership on the Commission.
Motion by Wright to adopt Ordinance 0314 upon second reading and publish same.
Seconded by Sheridan. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
BIAS - W-75C:
The City IUMAger read the following list of bids and a memo from the Consulting
Engineer.
TiATER IMPROVE24M PROJECT 75 -C
(SCHEDULE 1)
3 MG RESERVOIR
BID 01'SMC- Co OCTOB'8R 11, 1965 AT 12;00 NOW
•
'Ul UTEs OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PAVE 6
PLA1vBOIDER BID SURETY LUMP SM4 BID CCHMTION TIME:
• Acton Construction Co., Inc. U.S.F & G $188,737.00 200 Days
1871 West County Road "C" 5% Bid Bond
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420
Maguey Construction Co. Aetna Casualty $207,280.00 Sept. 1, 1966
20 Shady Oak Road 57. Bid Board
Hopkins, Minnesota
Peterson- Templin, Inc. Transamerica. $177,421.00 Sept.--I, 1966
6402 Bass Lake Road 57. Bid Bond
Minnaaolis, Minnesota 55428
Walter D. Giertsen Co. Planet Ins. Co. $230,764.00 318 Days
3501 Beawood
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Watson Construction Co. Plano Ins. Co. $190,000.00 320 Days
500 Loring Bldg. -1409 Willow 5% Bid Bond
Minneapolis, Minn. 55403
C. S. McCrossan, Inc. No Bid
R.R. 2, Box 322
New, Minnesota .
• Monette Construction Co. United Pacific $187,773.00 150 Days
2050 White Bear Avenue 5% Bid Bond
St. Paul, Mina. 55109
Drake Construction Co. U.S.F & G $199,750.00 150 Days
6311 Wayxata Boulevard 5% Bid Bond
3t. Louis Park, Minn. 55416
Dory Builders, Inc Agricultural Ins. $181,600.00 320 Days
5440 Douglas Drive Co., 516 Bid Bond
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55429
Gunnar I. Johnson & Sono Inc. St. Paul F & M $182,300.00 300 Days
9320 James Avenue So. 5% Bid Bond
1- 11nneapolis, l.Mian. 55431
The Consulting Engineer recasisended that the contract be awarded to
Peterson - Templin Incorporated of-6402 Bass Lake Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
in the amount of $177,421.00. The Consulting Engineer stated that this bid
is below the estimate made by the Consulting Engineers of $185,000.
Motion by Kirkham to concur with the recommendation of the Consulting
Engineer and award the bid for construction of the water reservoir project
W 75C to Peterson - Templin, Inc. in the amount of $177,421. Seconded by
• Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
•
0
tulli.in's, OF CCTonaf'. 18, -1965
BIDS - SS V.
Tile city Manager read the followic8 list of bids-.
STOM4 SHIER n3 0MgETZT PROJECT #12
BIi'D�OPENING OZt OCTOBER _ a965 AT .12-.00 k3 V
PLAIMOI.DER
C, rr,,S. McCrossan, Luc. BID SSURET -f 5% Transamerica
,
J .R, 2, Baz 322 SCHEDU0 Ac, $
09600, Minnesota SCFtvwou W. $ 63,908.00
SCHWUIE C a 9y316.00
GRAPID T'OITAL: ,41,227,581-00 y �y
COkR UTIMT T9 a ec e
Johnson Bros. Wy & Hvyv. Qmst. BID SURETY-. 5% Traveler*
P.O� Box 1002 SCMULE Af $1,354,346.00
Litchfield, Minn. SCMDUIZ B€ $ 83,324.50
SCIEDULS Cs $ 12, 052.00
GRM TOTA s 17,4492 TSU
CMUgrTV 'T=. On iaFw x j; rd8—
Peter Lwatti Coast. Co.
615 Drake Streot
St. Paul, Minn. 55102
Petrowskre & Ross, Inc.
3613 - 53rd Place No.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
McDonald -Luben & Assoc., Inc
211 north pascal
St. Maul, Minnesota
BID SURETYa 576 Seaboard
SCHEDULE A: $1,749,048.71
SCMDULB Ba $ 117,181.44
SCHEDULE Cs $ 169401.72
=%ND TOTAL.: $1,882,_631_.87
t'.QMMVION TDZo
BID SUE(E 1 U 510
SCHBDUIZ As $
SCHEDULE B g $
SCHEDULE Cs $
GRAND TOTALLs
camW N TUE.. As
FACE 7
Transamerica
989,983.30
74,479.78
10,957.94
42 .
Specified
BID SUBETYg 57. Seaboard
SCHEDULE M $1,673,902.50
SCHEDULE B. $ 72,464.50
SCEM IE C2 $ 10,335.15
GRAND TOTALS 7caa -�� M E, Specified
Northern Contracting Co., Inc.
BID M ETYs
5% Transamerica
Box 272
SCHEDULE Aaa
$1,046,907.40
Hopkins, Minn. 55344
SCHEDULE B.
$ 72,035.90
SCHEDULE C?
1, 11, 715.00
GRMD TOTAL.
21,130,658.30
COMPIS'rYt
pec e
Lemetti & Sons, Inc.
Bid Surety-.
5% Seaboard
2560 North Cleveland Ave.
SCl WWZ A.
$ 866,139.00
St. Paul, Minn. 55113
SCHBDUTE B.
$ 88,904.00
SCHEDUYE C2
11,787.00
•
CRAND TOTAL
966,83
V
1 v
-0..�.OQ
peciiied
NUTS OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PACE 8
He stated that the bids were made on a lump sum calculated from a unit cost
of construction. basis. He stated that the lump sum was made by the contractor
adding up the unit cost of construction under an estimate of the amount of
work to be done for construction of the project. The City Engineer provided
a table of unit price extensions for examination by the Council. The City
Manager stated that the bid of C. S. 111cCrosaan does not include a lump sum
amount for construction under Schedule A, and the City computed this amount.
Mr. Comstock rusted that law bidder for this project is Lametti & Sons, and
the bid is below the etatimated cost of construction.
Comcilman Wright asked whether the contractor would have to suspend
operations in order to avoid interfering with railroad traffic when
working below the railroad tracks. Mr. Comstock stated that the trains
will continue on schedule and the contractor will coordinate his work so
as not to interfere with railroad traffic. Councilman Wright asked whether
it would be possible to notify the low bidder of the intention'of the Council
to award the contract to him in order that the low bidder could negotiate
with the railroad and the Minnesota Highvay Department to obtain the
neccusary coordination for his work. Mr. Comstock stated that he believes
the City could return the bids and the bid security of all the bidders except
the two lowest biddere pending agreement wLth the City of Columbia Heights
for construction of the project. Mr. Comstock stated that the loosest bidder
was Gatti & Sons, Inc., of 2560 North Cleveland Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota,
and the second loweat bidder was Petrowske & Ross, Inc. of 3613 - 53rd Place
North, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
• Motion by Wright to receive the bids for construction of Storm Sewer Project
#12 snd return to the bidders their bid bonds except to Lam►etti & Sons, Inc.
and 'Petrowske & Rose, Inc. vbich Council finds to be the low bidder and
second low bidder respectively. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nay &, the motion carried unanimously.
•
BOARD OF APPEAL k1EETiNG MINUTES - OCTOBER 6, 1965
Motion by Wright to concur with the Board of Appeals and grant the request of
Harlead Berry for a variance of the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet
to permit construction of a double bungalow on Lot 1, Block 1, Omtman`s 3rd
,Addition. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the
motion carried unanimously.
TO CQNTSTRUCT A NMING HCF!E IN AN R -1
- ivy OF SECTION 11 _LAREA SOU MIN OF 76T-R AVEIT0, .EAST
VENUZ.. WEST OF IrAITY HOSP'.1`1'ALI rlNOXA COUNTY. MNNES1
Cotmei`cman Sheridan stated that the Plc-acing Coe mkaston studied this request
and referred it to the Building Board. Re eta.ted that the Planning Coamission
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PACE 9
recommended the Council take no action until the Building Board reviews
the request.. The City Manager suggested that the Council may want to
authorize Mr. Hodne to work with Winslow & associates to draw the plot plan
for this area.
Mr. Vernon ]Plaisance and Mr. Earl Burkhardt were present at the Council
Mwting representing Winslow &- Associates, and Mr. Burkhardt stated that he
attended the Planning Commission meting and the Planning Commission declined
to act on his request and passed it on to the City Council. He stated that
the Planning Commission took the position that Winslow & Associates should
develop a plan for the entire eleven acre plat before the Planning Commission
considers rezoning or a special use permit.. Mr. Burkhardt stated that ht
would ask the Council to grant the same consideration to Winslow & Associates
granted to the petitioner for construction of a nursing home east of the
hospital. Mr. Burkhardt stated that the only season a nursing hove was not
located west of the hospital, in his opinion, was that no. one . bought this
property and considered building a nursing home upon this property. Mr.
Burkhardt stated that Winslow & Associates are amenable to developing this
property, but would like assurance that if the property is platted Winslow &
Associates would receive a special use permit for construction of the nursing
homes.
Councilman Wright asked Mr. Burkhardt whether be is aware that Hodne Associates
are preparing a land use plan for the entire City of Fridley. Mar. Burkhardt
stated that he was not aware of this fact and asked whether it would be
possible for Winslow & Associates to contact Hodne Associates and work with
• them in drawing a plat plan for the eleven acre tract. Councilman Wright
stated that Hodge Associates is prohibited from working with private
developers unless authorised to do to by.the Council. Mr. Burkhardt stated
that Winslow & Associates have plans to establish a buffer zone around the
nursing how and separate it frow the surrounding residential area. He
explained his plans to the Council and showed the Council a plot plan of the
nursing home upon the eleven acre. tract. Councilman Wright stated that he
believes it is the opinion of the Council that the professional planner could
clarify the plans of Vinelow & basocLates egad make al plan which would be in
the best interest of the City of Fridley. Councilman Wright stated that the
Council rezoned property east of Unity hospital and considered doing the same
with property west of,the hospital. Mr. Burkhardt stated that Winslow &
Associates would be happy to work with the City planaler or with any other
City officials to draw a plait of this Rend.
Mr. Plaisance stated that he would ask the Council to give Winslow & Associates
a special use permit this evening contingent upon the acceptance by the
Planning Cosaaission and the Council of the plat under preparation by Winslow
& Associates. Mr. Plaisance stated that Winslow & Associates built a number
of nursing homes and owns some of these nursing homes. Be s`.aated that this
construction is not for speculation, but Winslow & Associates is in the
business of building and operating nursing homes. Mr. Plaisance stated that
In his opinion there in no.need to have a planner review the plat of the eleven
acre tract. He stated that tits location of the nursing home adjoins the
hospital, and this location is appropriate for a nursing home. Mr. Plaisance
• stated that its does not care what is done with property on the east aide of
the hospital. Pia:. Plaisance stated that theme is a need for more nursing
TUM11ES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PACE 10
• bongo in the City of Fridley and he believes that construction of
additional nursing homes would help to satisfy that need. He stated that
when Winslow & Associate* nettle applications in other Cities, they were
info,rmed that previous applicants had already requested permits for
cons ruction of nursing }roves, and for this reason other Council* considered
denying the request of Winslow & Associates. No started, however, that it
was the experience of Winslow & Associates that construction of their
nurs:tng hove in addition to the others dial not provide too such nursing
home space. He stated that in some circumstances the other nursing homes
were never built. Mr. Plaisance asked the Council to grant a special use
pevmclt to Winslow & Associates this evening contingent upon approval by
the Planning Commission of the plat of the eleven acre tract in order that
Winslow & Associates could continue planning and begin construction of the
aurasing home in the daring. He stated that the design of the nursing home
to not done in any short period of tine but requires several months of
planing. He stated that if the special use pe -rmit its granted to Winslow &
Associates imediately, then `%Ttnslow & Associates could begin plying the
use of this plat -
Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Plaisance whether Winslow & Associates owns
this property. Mr. Plaisance answered that Winslow & Associates does not
own this property at this time, but has a purchase agreement contingent
upon obtaining a special use permit for construction of the nursing home.
Couneilman Sheridan asked Hr. Plaisance horn long this purchasing agreement
is in effect. Mr. Plaisance answered that he does not khow.
• Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Plaisance whether Winslow & Associates would
agree: to dedicate part of the property for construction of 75th Street.
W. Plalaance examined the plan and stated that he believes Winslow & Associates
would have no objections to dedicating a street eamsewnt on 75th Avenue
17arthearst. The City Attorney stated that the City is in the process of
obtaining that easement at the present time.
Councilman Wright informed Mr. Plaisance that he believes it is proper for
the City Council to request Winslow & Associates to integrate planning of
this eleven acre tract with City plans just as the Council has asked other
developers to integrate planning of new subdivisions with planning done in
the rest of the City. Counciluu m Wright stated that if Winslow & Associates
agrees to coordinate their plans with those; of the City, they could consult
with the City Planning Consultant.
Mayor Bee stated that the nursing howaffi are proposed to be built in a good
residential neighborhood. He stated that, whereas, this is not a radical
use for a residential neighborhood, he believes the neighbors would want to
consider the construction of the nursing bees before the Council grant* a
special use permit for its construction. He stated that the Council agrees
that the location of the nursing home in a residential neighborhood is not
incompatible with its use. Be stated that good planning of the tract would
insure that construction of the nursing how would not encroach upon the uses
of the area. Mayor Hey stated that he does not believe it is unreasonable
that Winslow & Associates delay planning of the nursing home in order to
• insure a well developed and well planned gnat.
1CNrJTj',?S OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PAGE I
• Councilman Wright informed Mr. Plaisawce that Mr. Plaisence was asking for
a departure £ron► the usual procedures and policies of the City in asking that
a special use pe=it be grunted iMediately without properly recording a
plat and assuming that the plan would be properly worked out. Councilman
Wright stated that if the plat of the eleven acre tract is developed in a
good way by a professional planner, the Council vaould probably approve the
special use permit for the nursing home.
Mr. Burkhardt asked the Council what Winslow & Associates would have to do
to get permission to dibeuse these plans with the City Planner. Mayor Nee
answered that the Council could authorize the City Planning Consultant to
work with Winslow & Associates.
Mayor Nee stated that he is concerned with getting a goad reaction on the
part of the neighborhood to construction of the nursing home. He stated
that the Council must hold a Public Hearing upon this request. Councilman
Sheridan stated that it is mandatory that the Council hold a Public Hearing
before issuing the special use permit. He agitated that if the Council were
to grant a special use permit contingent upon proper planning, the special
use permit could be removed and Winslow & Associates would receive no gain
since the special use permit would not have been given to Winslow & Associates
under the proper procedures.
Mr. Burkhardt asked the Council if the Council were to grant the special use
permit for construction of the nursing home on the east side of this hospital,
would Council grant a permit for construction of a nursing home on the west
IS wide of the hospital. Councilman Wright answered that he does not believe
construction of a nursing home on the east aide of the hospital would matter
to the Council.
Motion by Wright to authorise Hodne Associates to consult with Winslow &
Associates in connection with a plan for the proposed eleven acre tract owned
by Winslow & Associates at the option and expertise of Winslow & Associates.
Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
Motion by Wright to receive and file the remainder of the aiuutes of the
Board of Appeals Meeting of October 6, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a
voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
BOAKD OF APPEALS MMT NG MMMS .- OCTOBER 13, 19655
The City Manager read the minutes of the Board of Appeals recommending that
variance be granted, and showed the Council a draving of the proposed con-
struction.
Lotion by Kirkham to concur with the Board of Appeals and grant the request
• of Mr. and Mrs. Donald Cisewski for a variance of the side yard requirement
from 10 feet to 8 feet for construction upon their property at 1559 - 75th
Avenue Northeast. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, theme being no
nays, the motion carried unanimously.
the
NaPUIES Or OCTOBER 18, 1965 PAGE 13
UEST BY CHESTER BROZAK 5110 - 3RD Si`WT N08THEAST, FOR A VARIMCE CfT
THE FRONT YARD M&UnIEWNT FRCM 35 FEET TO 30 FEET: -
Motion by Wright to concur with the Board of Appeals and grant the request
of Mr. Chester Broaak for a variance of the front yard requirement from
35 sect to 30 feet. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being
no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
BUILDING BOARD 1G MINUTES - OCTOBER 13 1965;
Ifc. Geis was present at the Council Meeting and stated that the Building
Inspector questioned whether construction of a pigeon loft complies with
the ordinance. The City Manager Informed Mr. Geis that be should ask the
City Health Officer about his proposal to build a pigeon loft. Mr. Geis
showed the Council planes of the pigeon. loft. He explained that these plans
were prepared by the Breeding Association. Mr. Geis stated that several
asnnicipalities have denied permits for construction of pigeon lofts and
denied citizens the aright to raise pigeons within the municipal limits.
He stated that the Breeding Association has drawn up a proposed ordinance
to regulate the raising of pigeons. Mr. Geis stated that at the present time
he is raising pigeons in his garage. Mayor Nee informed Mr. Geis that it in
hiv belief that as the ordinances of the City stand at the present time,
Mr. Geis would be permitted to raise pigeons. Mayor Nee suggested that the
Administration could take care of Mr. Geisas request and Council action was
not necessary.
The City Manager stated that a correction should be evade in the minutes of
the Building Board to the effect that this building would be built at 7570
T, H, #65 Northeast. He showed the Council plans of the proposed construction.
Councilman Sheridan asked whether the City needs a dedication for a street
easement on 75th Avenue. The City gagger replied that there is a dedication
of the street easement as far as the trailer court.
Motion by Kirkham to concur with the Building Board and grant the permit for
construction of a commercial office and warehouse at 7570 T.H. #65 Northeast
with the stipulation that the north and south walls are painted or have a
better finish or coveting upon them. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice
vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
MMNG C=43310H MIETiNn ,KDWTES OCTOBER-141 965:
6
The City Manager read the minutes of the Planning Commission Meoting recoeomasding
• denial of the request.
Mr. Harry Brooks eras present at the Council feasting representing the Standard
Oil Company and asked the Council to consider the request for rezoning this
property. Mr. Brooks stated that he believes his request for rezoning is
Mx,V=s OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PACE 13
• justified, since part of the land in the immediate neighborhood is zoned
C -2, part of it is zoned R -1, and part of it R -3. Mr. Brooks stated that
the Standard Oil Company plans to acquire 3 -3/4 acres. Mr. Brooks stated
that there is heavy .traffic on Highway #65 and on Interstate Preeway.#694.
He stated that construction of a signal is planned at Test Moore Lake-Roid
and T. H. #65 and that the Minnesota Highway Department plans to construct
turn -offs along T.H. #165 at this intersection. He showed the Council aerial
photographs of the neighborhood. Mr. Brooks stated further that if the out-
door theatre in the neighborhood moves, this area will probably be converted
to a general shopping area, and he feels this further argument should justify
his request for rezoning of this property. Mr. Brooks stated that this
property is located just to the north of the theatre, and that present
property which is zoned commercially is too far southfrom the intersection of
West Moore 'wake and T. H. #65 to make construction of a service station on
the property already zoned C -2 desirable.
Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Brooks what the Standard Oil Company contem-
plates for the remainder of the 3 -3%4 acre site in addition to construction
of a service station. Mr. Brooks answered that the Standard Oil Company
believes the rest of the site would be a good locations for a restaurant
and a motel. Mr. Brooks stated that the service station will occupy 26,000
square feet of this site and he believes the site is an excellent location
for a service station. Councilman Wright stated that the City Planner did
have a proposal for future use of this property. Councilman Sheridan stated
that he would like to have the Couw!'.l hear the views of Mr. Hodne concerning
thie propeirty and would like to have tar. Hodne review the plans for this
• property.
Mr. Johnson, the owner of the property at this time, was present at the
Couccil Meeting. Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Johnson whether he would be
willing to discus his plans for this property with the City Planning Consultant.
Mr. Johnson stated that he would be willing to do so.
Councilman Wright stated that residents in the neighborhood are concerned
aboat the rezoning of this property. He stated that he believes the Council
should authorize the planner to discuss plans for use of this property with
the owners before the Council calls a hearing on this request. Mayor Nee
stated that he believes the Council should not schedule a hearing for this
request until Standard Oil Company and the property owner have discussed
their plume with the City Planning Consultant. Mr. Brooks stated that he
would be happy to discuss plans for this property with the City Plamiing
Consultant.
Councilman Wright stated that at the hearing held before the Planning
Commission many people objected to the rezoning of this property and did not
want construction of a service station in this neighborhood. Councilman
Wright stated that he believes these people were not thinking of the total
planning of the City when stating their objections to this use of the land.
13r. Brooks stated that he believes the residents in the neighborhood do not
appreciate the value of land.
Mayor Nee invited visitors to the Council Meeting to make comments concerning
the proposed use of the property.
MIZIES CF OCTOBER 18, 1365 PAGE Zk
• Mr. William H. Kell was present at the Council Ming and stated that his
home borders on the back of the property proposed for use as a service
station. He stated that he does not want to see the property immediately
behind his house used as a service station. Re stated that he believes
the Federal dousing Administration ar d the Veterans Administration are not
allowed to authorize loans on property in such chase proximity to business
places, since the location of business
places in such proximity to homes lowers the value of the property for
residential cute. Mr. Kell stated that previous property owners requested
rezoning of this property and the rezoning was denied. Fir. Kell stated
that he would oppose reeou ng this property with all the power that a small
property owner can bring to bear.
Mayor Nee stated that the City Attorney has advised the Council that the
Council is obliged to consider the request of the Standard Oil Company
in spite of the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the request
be denied. Mayor Nee started that the Council is also obliged to consider
the recommendation of the Plannixag Carmiasion. Mayor Nee stated that when a
Public Hearing is held upon the matter, he hopes the plans will have been
reviewed by the Planning Consultant and that the Council will have recomenda-
tione from the Planning Consultant and plans for use of the land in accord with
his recommendations. Mayor Nee stated that all neighboring property owners
would be informed of this Public Hearing.
The Council took no action upon this request..
• LOT SPOT UESTs L.S. 465.12 FALK CONSTRUCTION, INC-. LOT 1 AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVISION #1291
The City Manager read the motion of they Planning Commission recommending that
the lot be split into three lots. He stated that there is no Certificate of
Survey of the property, but that a sketch of the property is included. Hoea-
ever, than sketch does not show the b foot utility easement recommended by the
Planning Commission.
Councilman Wright **led whether Lakeside Road along the east Boundary of f hi♦
property will be aligned with the Lakeside Road north of the property and
whether 75th Avenue to the eant of the property would be aligned with 75th
Avenue along the north side of this property. The City Manager answered
that these streets would not be :dully altaned under the plan recommended V
the Planning Commission. Councilman Bright suggested that the City auk rite
owner to dedicate another 25 feet on the east side of the property far sa.a
easement in order to align Lakeside Road along the east side of this pr�jperty
with Lakeside Road to the north of the property. Councilman Sheridan pointed
out that if the owner is :required to dedicate another 25 feet of thist
property, it would cut the lot size down, from €s depth of 113 feet. G)uncilman
Wright proposed that, the City ask for dedication of a 45 foot easewr.t along
the north side of the property in order to align t'5th Avenue Northeast along
the north side of the property. The Mayor asked the City Engineer what the
width of the paving will be upon the easer�eents to be dedicated to the City.
The City Engineer answered 36 feet. Councilman ter ght asked the City Engineer
. whether it would be possible to align Lakeside Road along the east side of
this property with Lakeside road north of the property oa the preseazt
easement. The City Engineor answered that this could be done by setting the
%*ai paving on the west side of the easement provided thrre are: no sidewalks
along the east side of this property.
i'aNU!JZS OF OCT073ER 18, 1965 PAGE 15
Notion by Wright to grant the request of Lawrence Falk for a lot split-o€
his property as outlined in L. S. #65 -12 contingent upon receipt of a 25
.,foot easement on the south edge of the property for a future road, a 25
foot easement along, the east side of the property for construction of
Lakeside Road, a dedication of 33 foot easement along the north side of
the property for construction of 75th Avenue Northeast:, and a six foot,
utility and drainage easement along the west sine of the property. Seconded
by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unazaimoualy.
I
The City Manager read the motion of the Planning Commission recommending -
that Lot Split L.S. 4165 -11 be granted. The City Manager explained that no
Certificate of Survey accompanied the request. Mr. Smith was present at
the Council Meeting and presented a Certificate of Survey to the Council.
He explained his request for a lot split to the Council. The City
Engineer showed the Council an aerial map of the property.
Lotion by Wright to approve the requeav of Smith and Anderson, Inc. for
lot split LSa#65 -11, of Lots 13 through 15, Block 2, Hyde Park Addition.
Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the moti n
carried unanimously.
VACATION OF EASBL�iT: LOT Ilt BIOCK 4 BROORVIEW MMACB SECOt1D AMITIO :
• Mr. Wagner was present at the Council Meeting and presented the Council with
letters from Northern States Power Co. and from the telephone company
agreeing to vacation of a two foot strip along the west aide of the utility
easement.
Motion by Wright to approve the request of fir. Wagner for vacation of a
2 foot strip along the went side of the utility easement on his property,
same being tot 11, Block 4, Brookview Terrace Second Addition. Seconded by
Urkhama. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
FR 3LEY HOUSING AND MDEVELOI?19NT AUTHORITY 14MTING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER. 29, 1965-.
Motion by Kirkhm to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and
Redevelopcient Authority I"ting of September 29, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nayb, the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDL Y HAU3I1IG AND REDEVE M49NT AUTIMITY N IRG IMU173S - OCTOBER 6, 1965:
Motion by Kirkham to receive and file the mutes of the Fridley Housing and
Redevelopment Authority Fleeting of October 6, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
CL'I2�7N"tCA ^a It�13 s
the City Manager stated that he has not heard from the Minnesota Highway
Department concerning a'change of designation of T.H. #100 to Interstate
HiEhvey 7M94. The City Manager stated that he believes the Council could
appro ve the request of the Mi tl ned Coop 0-1_ CogManya for a c4ange in their
NV =3 CV (1cTY3mm 18, 1965 PAGE 16
. address, and he stated that he would check the request further upon receipt
of information frcm the Mnue rota, Hiuhviay Department.
Motion by Wright to approve the x:equent or the Midland Coop Oil Company for
a change of address from Main Street and T.H. 9100 to Main Street and Inter-
state Highway #694. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being
no nays, the motion carried crux lswusly.
ULITEBklAN2- CON'SMUCTION OF 61ST AVENUE NO&Z _
The City Manager stated that he had been misinforaad by the previous City
Engi r and the Mfnnesote Highway Department has not granted a crossing
of T.H. #65 at 61st Avenue Northeast useless the City requests them to do so.
The City Manager pointed out that construction of 61aft Avenue Northeast from
T.R. #65 to Old Central to planned as part of 5treat Construction Project
#1966 -2.
Mr. Saliterman was present at the Council Meeting and stated that
construction of the road Baas proposed by the Council, and he would like
to see the road constructed at an earlier date. He stated that he had
given a dedication of the easement for the road to the City Attorney. The
City Engineer Informed Mr. Saliterman that these was a mistake in the survey
and that the City vill need a correct survey of the dedicated easement.
Councilman Sheridan asked the City Engineer whether it would be possible
for lair. Saliterman to build the road himself if he wants it sooner provided
• Mr. Saliterman builds the road to City aspeaci €icsations. The City Eugl%W&r
stated that this is a State Aid road and than City would receive no reimburs-
ment for construction of the road if Mx. Sr-literman builds the road. The
City Engineer 'stated that it will be necessary for the City to advertise
for bids for construction of the road.
Mayor. Nee masked whether if the City requests the Minnesota Highway Department
to grant a crossing of T.H. #65 at 61st Avenue Northeast it will be necessary
for the City to abandon the crossing of T.B. #65 at 63rd Avenue N -)rtheast.
The City Manager stated that this correct. Councilman Sheridan stated that
he would object to giving up * crossing at 63rd Avenue Northeast. He stated
that businesses located along T.H. #65 have used these crossings for 10 years
and that the businesses depend upon access to their property 'frcami T.H. #65.
The Mayor stated that he believes it would be possible for the City to
negotiate with the Iflnnuesota Uishway Department for construction of both
croassings.
11otion by %right directing the Ctty Administration to make a formal request
of the Minnesota Highway Department for a crossing of T.H. #65 at 61st Avenue
Northeast, and an unconditional request for continuance of the present
crossing at 63rd Avenue Northeast. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote,
there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously.
QTY ENGIMR: SEM SYSTEM (SYLVAN NIl.I.3t,_,,,�
•
The City Manager stated that he requested a m o from the City Engineer
concerning the sawer system, in Sylvan Rills before Mr. Powell called and
asked that the matter be brought to the attention of the Council. The City
MIM=S OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PACE 17
Man;:ag er stated that examination of the sewer in Sylvan Iaills shows that
these sewer lines are already surcharged. The City Manager stated that
construction to alleviate this problem would cost $24,000 and may not
accompl1oh a great deal. The City HanaGer stated that he believes
construction at an estimated cost of less than $1,000 to connect 4 homes
to the lift station in Sylvan. Hills would relieve the problem to these
four homes. The City Manager stated that., connection of the sanitary sewer
system north of Rice Creek into the mainc of the Forth Suburban Sanitary
Sewer District would do a great deal to atlle,,Nato the problem in Sylvan
Hills.
Mayor Ned stated that the City is in process of applying for connection to
the North Suburban Sanitary Sewer Distract lines. The Mayor also stated
that the City has made an application for $500,000 of federal funds to
clean the City sanitary sewers and for reconstruction of damage done to
the City sanitary sewers. The Mayor stated that he believes the City will
obteiln approval of most of these funds. Mayor Note stated that American
Pipe Services C qa ny has made a thoroug.,% study of the sanitary sewer system
in the City of Fridley, and the study indicates that a major part of the
problem in accumulation of debris in the sanitary sewers. The Mayor stated
that once these pipes are cleaned and sealed he believes the problem will
not be as critical an it is now. Mayor Neo stated that he believes the
City will know within another week whether or not Federal Aid will be avail-
able for cleaning the sewer system.
Mr. Ernest Powell, 6241 Suariee Drive Northeast, Wass present at the Council
• Ma Ling and stated that he and his neighbors have asked the Council to
alleviate the Sanitary Sewer back flooding in Sylvan Hills several tams
since March lat. Mr. Powell stated that he knows of eleven homes an Sylvan
Hills that have had as more or less continual problem since March let with
sanitary sewer back. flooding. He s ta3tezl that :irsi. Burn's home had been flooded
from sanitary sever back flooding before March lot, consistently. Mr. Powell
stashed that it is necassary -for the residents of Sylvan Hills to plug aced
stop the drains In the basement of thece homes. Mr. 'Powell stated that the
afternoon of this clay, the Public VAIWke Depart mat notified the resaidcnts to
plug the sanitary sewers again. He otat.ed. At.-Lta : it 'has been si d at council
Me�ati.ngs that this back flooding would be alleviated, and yet this samae day
that Public t1orka Department notified thm -to plug their severs. He asked
where the residents stand in regard to their repeated requests for shaving this
never problem aallevIated.
Mayor Nee stated that its regard to lair. Powell''s queetion the North Suburban
Sanitary Sewer Diatric.t has stated that their 131nes4s will be available to the
City for connection within ae. few days. The City Engineer stated that these
property owners were notified to plug; the veversa :In their basem.nts this day
because of a water main break in Donnay"o kddition. He stated that this wait
strictly a precautionary measure, and that the water did not cause a back -up
in the sanitary sewer.
Mr. Harvey Day, 6221 Sunrise Drive No- =theast, asked whether construction of a
new apartment buildinbr.would contribute additional sewage into the line which
. will back -flood into these homes, Mr, i"traastork easwered that the connection
from the apartment building gill be into the interceptor which serves Sylvan
Hills, and that he does not anticipate that, t e additional flow should cause
back - flooding in Sylvan Hills. Hays -r Vee stated that he believes part of
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PACE 18
the sanitary sewer system of the City will be connected to the N.S.S.S.b.
before the load from the apartment is added to this interceptor.
Mr. Day asked how long it will be before the American Pipe Coaprny cleans
these lines. Councilmen Wright answered that the American Pipe Company
has established four priority areas in the City and will clean these lines
according to priority before cleaning any of the others.
Councilman Wright stated that the Council has been planning to connect
part of the sanitary sewer system to the N.S.S.S.D. He stated that nego-
tiations are under way with the district for such connections. He stated
that some of these negotiations involve a trade of the capacity the City has
with the City of Minneapolis for free connections to the N.S.S.S.D.
Councilman Wright stated that the enact details of such a trade have to be
worked out before such connection is made.
Mr. Day asked the Council to notify the residents in the area when they
could pull the plugs in their basement drains and make free use of their
basements again.
Mrs. Ellingson stated that it has been two months since the American Pipe
Company surveyed the sanitary sewer lines in the City of Fridley and she
new no reason for the delay. She stated she is getting sewer gas in the
basement of her home, and has been informed that this is due to the disuse
of the sanitary sewer connection. Mayor Nee stated that the two mogths
bave been spent by the American Pipe Company in analysing the results of
their survey Mayor Nee stated that he believes connection of the
sanitary sewer system north of Rice Creek to the lines of the N.S.S.S.D.
will solve the problem for this area. He stated that it has been shown
that when the lift station at Rice Creek is disconnected, the surcharging
of the sanitary sewer system south of Rice Creek stops, indicating that
the sewer will flow normally once this part of the sanitary sewer system
is diverted to the N.S.S.S,,D, lines.
Ths Council took no action upon this request.
1965 PAVING CURB AND GUTTER -
Councilman Sheridan noted that improvement of these streets is included in
Street Construction Project #1966 -1.
Kati -n by Wright to receive Petition #27 -1965 and refer it to the Administration
for processing. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,
the action carried unanimously.
PETITION #28 -1%5 _%U6ST FOR FINISHING CONSTRUCTION ALONG OLD JOHNSON STBBETS
The City Engineer stated that the City plans to flatten the bank along the
west side of the construction and will need to sod the covered trench.
iNotion by Wright to receive Petition #28 -1965 and refer it to the Administra-
tion for processing. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being
no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PACE 19
• PETITION # 29 -1965 IMPitOVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF AMY BETWEEN 5
NORTHEAST 54TH AVENUE NORTHEAST AND 4TH STREET AND 5TH STREET N
Councilman Wright stated that this proposal differs from the usual procedure.
Be stated that in some parts of the City of Fridley the alley it platted,
whereas, generally in the City of Fridley there is no platted alley. Council-
man Wright stated that the property owners in this block have built garages
along the alley, and that the property owners cannot obtain access to these
garages from the front of their property and must use the alley for access
to their garages. Councilman Wright stated :hat seater flow deposits sand
in the alley raising the level of the alley, and as a result water floods
some of the property in this block. Counclkaan Wright stated that the
property owners have indicated an intention to pay for paving and maintenance
of this alley. Councilman Wright stated that he suggested to the property
owners that an asphalt mat be laid upon the alley. Councilman Wright
suggested that the City build such an alleys w erperimntal project and
maintain it for one year to find out if such construction is satisfactory
where the use pattern makes it necessary._.__:..
The City Engineer stated that communities putting in alleys find that a
black top alley does not hold up and it is difficult to maintain. He
stated that most of these commnities build a concrete alley. Councilman
Wright asked what is the cost of construction of a concrete alley. The
City Engineer stated that he did not know, but that it would be quite
expeneive. Councilman Wright stated that be gees nothing wrong with the
construction of an asphalt alley. Mr. Comstock: stated that a blacktop
alley is difficult to maintain, and that it is better to make the construction
of the alley permanent and of concrete in order to reduce maintenance cost.
Councilman Wright stated that a paved coat in the alley could be shaped so
as to form a center Swale for draining water from the alley.
The City Manager stated that the Administration is not opposing or recommending
against the eonatruction of this alley, however, paved blacktopped alleys
require excessive maintenance. Councilman Wright stated that the experience
to which the City Manager refers is in municipalities other than Fridley and
he Stated that Fridley ought to attempt this project to determine its
feasibility before deciding it is not feasible in the City of Fridley.
Councilman Wright stated that if it is found that such a project is not
feasible the City could drop 'such a project.
Mr. David Schaper, 5301 - 4th Street Northeast,.was present at the Council
Meeting, go stated that he lived in Columbia Heights before he lived in the
City of Fridley, that ho had a blacktop alley at that time, and the blacktop
alley worked very well. -The Mayor asked Mr. Schaper whether this alley was
a blacktop mat or P&H mix. Air. Schaper answered that he did not know.
Mr. Schaper stated that he also believes construction of any kind of an alley
would be b ,9tter than the present conditions.
Councilman Wright stated that if experience with the construction of the alley
shows that it would be better for the City to plow the alley to the winter
time and to grade it periodically in the summer time the City can do so.
. Mr. Otteu, 5311 - 4th Street Northeast, stated that the water from this block
is flooding basements in the area, and one basement has had four inches of
Mater in it which has ruined the furniture in the basement. Mr. Otten stated
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PAGE 20
• that 10 of the 16 pz"erty owners living in the block signed the petition,
and those pr"*rty ears know that the improvement will cost money.
Commettman Sheridl= suggested that the engineering department conduct a
feasibility study of the project, estimate the cost of the improvement
sd a TOCOMesdatime to the Council.
Motion by Wright to authorise and direct the Administration to conduct a
feasibility study of the improvement of the alley between 53rd Avenue and
54th Avenue Northeast in the block between 4th Street and 5th Street
Northeast, considering various surfaces for the alley with alternates and
" ce'esttmates of the-cost of same. Seconded iiy Sheridan. Uoon a voice
vote, there being no nays, the motion carried'unanimoustly.
FINANCE DUMCTOR: SEWER BILL
The City Manager explained• ;hat this sever bill was charged to Mr. and Mrs.
Schuur since the grocery store, which they awned, was inadvertently aesitted
from billing in the past. The City Attorney stated t %at the portion of the
bill which is more than six years old cannot be collected. The Finance
Director stated that the ruining portion of the bill then amounts to
$120.00 for the period from 1958 through 1963. Councilman Wright suggested
that the $120 be split in half and the Schuurs be asked if they will accept
the remainder of the bill. Mrs. Sehuur stated that they used the sewer only
three years and would be villiag to pay the three years sewer charges which
amount to $60.
• Notion by Kirkham to authorize the Finance Director to issue a refund of
$100 on the setter bill for the Debs Grocery to Mr. and Mrs. Schuur. Seconded
by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being r2o nays, the motion carried
unanimously. ;
75TH NORTHEAST - LOAD _LUaTS
Mr. Frank Ell,erbuseb, 7507 University Avenue Northeast, requested the Council
to restrict traffic on 75th.Avenue Northeast and on the University Ave. Service
road between 75th and Osborne Road. He stated that there is considerable
truck traffic from Unity Hospital. Mr. Ellerbusch stated that there are
ten houses along this street and 30 children under twelve years of age along
this street.
Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer whether this road was built to carry truck
traffic. The City Engineer answered that it was not. Councilman Wright
stated that he believes a weight limit should be set on the road until
construction of the hospital is completed. Councilman Wright stated that
he believes the load limit should be placed on University Avenue East SerVide
Drive from 75th Avenue Northeast to Osborne Road and on 75th Avenue Northeast.
Councilman Wright stated further that he believes the Administration should
investigate to see "other the dirt movers have a land alteration permit.
He stated that the Administration could set a load limit for the street if
the Council would authorize the Administration to do so.
• Notion by Wright to authorize the Administration to set load limits on 75th
Avenue Northeast from University Avenue East Service Drive Northeast to Lyric
Lane Wortheast and on University Avenue East Service Drive Northeast from 75th
Avenue Northeast to Osborn Road Northeast if necessary. Seconded by Kirkham.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
1UNU17.S OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PACZ 21
1M0VE?=T OF WEST M0089 LAZE ROAD FROM T.B. #65 TO BAKER AVENUES
A visitor to the Council Meeting asked whether it would be possible to obtain
the Improvement of West Move Lake Road from T. H. #65 to Baker Avenue. The
visitor stated that he represents St. Phillips Lutheran Church. He asked
whether the petition for iaprovement has been approved. Councilman Wright
answered that the petition has been approved but other petitions for
improvement in this area have not been received as yet. The visitor stated
that if the improvement is made the Church will act in one way, but if the
lmprovement is not made the Church will be forced to do something else.
Counci1nan Sheridan stated that he believes the improvement will be made.
He stated that procedure for ordering the improvement will require a Public
nearing and the Church will be notified of the Public bearing. Councilman
Wright stated that chances o.ithe improvement being completed would be in-
creased if three or four more signers mere added to the petition.
SIGN M T - BURGER KVG COMANY RESTAUEANTR
Councilman Kirkham ,Mated that he questions whether the limitation on signs
in a commercial zone in the proposed ordinance regulating signs is a misprint.
He stated that 40 square feet is a nighty small atign. Councilman Wright
stated that 40 square feet irr larger than the size of the standard place
of 3 -ply sheathing S* x V.
Mr. Peterson was present at the Council Meeting representing Burger King
Company. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Peterson whether he is correct that
• where municipalities do not allow Burger King to build the sire of signs
which they request, Burger King Coapday builds smaller signs. A representatiLe
of the Huber Sign Company was present at the Council Metting and stated that
signs for the Burger King Company are production signs and are not made to
special order. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Peterson whether there are any other
Burger Xing Restaurants in the cities. Mr. Peterson gave him seve,fal
addresses of Burger King Restaurants. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Peterson whether
it vould be posaLble to obtain a sig3a larger than 40 square feet last smaller
than the size Burger King Company proposes to build. Mar. Peterson daswered
that he prefers to build the larger ulgn. Mere was a lengthy discussion on
the value of having a larger sign.
The Council took no actions upon this request.
CITY ATTOR14EY; DAMAGE CLAIM
ThY§ City Manager informed the Council that Ivan Ericson is no longer an
employee of the City of Fridley. The City Attorney stated that he asked the
Count for a delay in order to give him time to prepare a defense for the case.
Notion by Kirkham to authorize the City Attorney to participate in the
defense of Ivan Ericson in the suit brought by Kenneth Charles Kraus.
Seconded by [right. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
• CITY ATTORNEYS BATIM
The City Manager stated that a proof of a proposed ballot was drawn upon the
recosscendation of the City Attorney, that all throe questions of the Housing
MIN U°1'ES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965 PAGE 22
and Renewal Authority bond issue need to be on one ballot. The City Clerk
read the statute concerning special question balloting to the Council.
Councilman Sheridan stated that if the ballot were going to be changed
from three separate ballots for each of the three questions to one ballot, he
<,. believes there should be only one question on the ballot. Councilman Wright
stated thatba believes there is something to be gained by haviuR three
separate questions on the ballot for each of the three separate projects,
since there will be a separate bond issue for each project. Councilman
Wright suggested that a large numeral be placed beside each question on the
ballot to direct the voters attention to the fact that there are three
separate questions on the ballot. Councilman Wright asked the City Clerk
whether there is time to change the ballot as proposed at the Council
M"ting. The City Clerk answered, "Yes/ °.
Motion by Wright to change the proof copy of the Housing and Renewal Bond
Isiva ballot in accordance a with the copy drawn at the Council Meeting and
approve the ballot with these revisions. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon'a`"
voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
SAC= HEART OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCH - itUIT CLAIM DEED GRONFISLD:
The City Manager stated that he obtained the agreement of Mr. Gronfield to
change the quit claim deed such that the City would pay for the easesaent
and not abate assessments in return for the easement. The City Attorney
stated that he believes it is only necessary to strike out the second line
of the statement in the quit claim deed expressing part of the consideration
• for delivery of the deed to make this change.
Motion by Wright to accept the quit claim deed and conveyance from the
Sacred Heart of Jesus Cacholic Church with conditions stated in the letter
from Mr. Gronfield to the Council. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice
vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously.
LOGAL .49: E77G1_=R.II'1V AFFILIATION:
Notion by Sheridan to receive and file the letter from Mr. McLellan of
Local No. 49. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no naps,
the motion carried unanimously.
UW.- 'DYIJa ING PCWaiT8:
Councilman Kirkham stated that he would like to receive information concerning
who is Lake -Urban Inc. The Council took no action upon this communication.
C%EM
Motion by Wright to approve General and Public Utilities Claims #6774
through #6893 for payment. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, these
being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
notion by Sheridan to approve Liquor Claims #7893 through #7925 for Payment-
Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
MM7ZS OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
• ESTLHATESa
Notion by Kirkham to approve the following estimates for payme=nt.
Comstock & Davis, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
1446 County Road "J"
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
For the furnishing of resident inspection and resident
supervision for the staking out of the construction work
for the following;
PAGE 23
Estimate #5 - Water Improvement Project Number
75 -B from August 30, 1965 to September 25, 1965,
(Booster Station - 63rd Avenue N. E. & T. H. #100) $ 30.00
Estimate #7 - Water improvement Project Number
75 -A from August 30, 1965 to September 25, 1965,
(free Additional brift Wells) $ 80.00
Estimate #2 - Sanitary Sewer & Water Improvement
Project Number 73-A from August 30, 1965 to
September 25, 1965 (54th & Innsbruck 5th Addn.) $2,482.75
Estimate #2 - Storm Seger Improvement Project.
• Number 73 from August 30, 1965 to September 25,
1965, (54th Avenue Northeast). $ 589.50
0
Estimate #10 - Sanitary Sewer & Water UWrovement
Project Number 70 from August 30, 1965 to September
25, 1965 (Riverview Terrace, south of Mississippi
Place; Uncola (Ashton) Street, south of Ironton
Street; Sth Street, south of T.H. #100). $ 60.00
Estimate #15 - Sanitary Sewer & Water Improvement
Project Number 67 from August 30, 1965 to Septem-
ber 25, 1965. (1964 Sanitary Sewer & Water Program). $ 5.00
Estimate #6 - Water Improvement Project Number 34-0
fraa August 30, 1965 to September 25, 1965 (crossing
T.H. #694 - Johnson Street, 7th Street). 30.00
$3,277.25
Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
Motion by Sher'-dm to approve the following a etimates for payment to debris
clean up contractorst
Inv. so. Contractor Equ
Amount
Bob Crawford Dump Truck /operator $ 456.00
1824 FriAley Trucking Co. Tandem Trash Tracks
TDTAL 11, 546. M
MD,T S Or MM13ER 18, 1965
PAGE 24
Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
QU{3'&&TiCN: BALANCE OF UXKE PARK CLEAN UP
The City Manager stated that there is considerable work left to be done in
Locke Part:. The City Dt mager stated that he could no. determine from the
list of bids who was the lowest and beat bidder for the project. He
stated that perhaps the City Attorney would want to have the City advertise
for bids. The City Manager stated further that all the bids received were
based upon an hourly rate for the clean up and in addition some of the
bidders estimated the maximum amount of the cost for the project. He
stated that he believes it would be difficult to write a set of speci-
fications for the work and, hence, it would be difficult to ask for bids
for the work.
€irtyor Nee asked whether there is any possibility of getting recommendations
of the 'best contractor for the work from members of the School of Forestry
of the University of Minnesota. The City Manager stated that the City
obtained the help of the Forest Service when the JC's were working in Locked
park.
The City Attorney stated that he did not know how the City could get around
advertising for bide for the work unless the City considers this project
an emergency. Councilman Wright stated that the project would be paid
with emergency funds and that there might be some logic to considering
• this project an emergency in order to gave the time and expense of calling
forbids. Councilman Wright asked whether the Parka Director is competent
to review these bids. The City Manager suggested that perhaps the City
could obtain a set of specifications to use for bids from the School of
Forestry from the university of Hinnesota.
Wilbur Whitmore stated that the JC's found it expedited the work to use a
stump cutter and a boom truck. He stated that it is quite expensive to use
a stump cutter and the JC's obtained a cut rate for the use of the stump
cutter. He stated that it costs $10 per stump ordinarily to use the
.stump cutter. Councilman Kirkham stated that be hopes whoever does the
work will use a chipper and spread the chips around the park for compost.
Wilbur H'hitmore stated that same of the work aeeds to be done on a steep
hillside and mould require a bulldozer is order to perform the work.
Councilman Sheridan asked whether the County has a forestry supervisor.
The City Attorney answered that the County Agricultural Agent would know.
The City Manager suggested the Council table the item until more infuriation
could be procured concerning the work.
Motion by Wright to table consideration of the quotations of the balance
of Locke Park clean-up pending receipt of further information. Seconded!
by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
• unanimously.
MMUS OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PACE 25
lf.CE�1, SSS:
Notion by Sheridan to approve the licenses, append the list to the minutes,
add to the list the request of Smith and Anderson for a general contractors
license and approve aaswc. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, the motion carried unanimausly.
ROOF FUN EMBERS DRIVE -IN:
Councilman Sheridan stated that the roof from the old Embers Drive -in has
been moved to property near the intersection of Mi Avenue Northeast and,
T.H. #65. Be stated that the roof is sitting on old block& and contributes
a junky appearance to the property. Councilman Sheridan asked if a moving
permit was granted to the person who moved the roof to this property. The
City Manager replied that he was not aware that a roof was moved to this
property or that it was sitting there at this time.
The Council took no action upon this matter.
SIGN PERMIT - BURGER RING RESTWUNTs
Nation by Kirkham to table to the regular Council Meeting of November 1, 1965
consideration of the sign permit request of the Burger Ring Company. Seconded
by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
0
The City Engineer stated that the City received petition& for all the projects
Included in 1966 -1. The City Manager stated that one of the petitions was
signed by 587. of the property owners, another by 49% of the property owners,
and others 637. and 757. of the property owners. Councilmen Wright suggested
that items 12,13, and 14 for improvement of 69th Avenue from East River Road
to Hickory Drive, Hickory Drive, Hickory Circle, and Hickory Place be deleted
from the project. The Mayor pointed out that only 537. of the property owners
signed this petition. He suggested that the Council ask these perm ns to
obtain a new petition. The City Manager pointed out that all the property
owners on 69th Avenue are opposed to the improvement of 69th Avenue from
East River Road to Hickory Drive. The City Engineer stated that if this
part of the project is deleted, there will be only four people available
to pay for construction of this part of the street in the future and it will
probably never be built. He stated that if it is included in this project,
the cost could be spread among all the property owners in this project.
Councilmen Sheridan stated that he mould suggest the Council leave this part
of the improvement in the street project, and i f the property owne s appear
to be opposed to it, the Council could delete it at the hearing. Councilman
Kirkham stated that the only way the City could settle the question of the
improvement in this area is to hold a hearing and hear these people out.
The City Engineer stated that there gill be more proposals added to street
project 1966 -1 in the near future.
• Notion by Wright to adopt Resolution #189 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a
voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
•
1W.W7ES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PACE 26
ESTIMATES
The City Engineer stated that it would be possible to assign State Aid Funds
for Improvement of Ashton Street and cut down the cost of street improvement
to property owners in this area.
Notion by Wright to adopt Resolution #190 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon
a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION #191-
ii +A
FIAICI
The City Manager stated that the Minnesota Highway Department informed his
that it in not urgent for the City to approve this Resolution immediately.
He stated that if the Council wishes to do so they could table it until
Columbia Heights takes action upon a sisilar resolution. The City Engineer
stated that this resolution is for the purpose of approving the highway design
and not for the storm sewer. Mayor Nee asked whether the Administration
reviewed the plans and ascertained that they were in compliance with the
wishes of the City. The City Engineer anevered, "Yes ". Councilman Sheridan
asked whether the intersection of 44th Avenue with proposed T.H. #47 will
blend in at the present grade level. The City Engineer answered, -'Yes."
Motion by Sheridan to adopt Resolution #191 -1965. Seconded by Wright. 'Upon
A voice vote, there being no ways, the motion carried unanimously.
- A.N. AND GLADYS BULTTENA - 381
The City Manager stated that this was not a tornado damaged home. Councilman
Wright examined the plan of the proposed construction and asked why the property
owner had a lei foot space between the house and the garage. The City Manager
pointed out that the property owner vay be planning this since the garage
is not fully in the back yard. The City Manager pointed out that if the
garage is placed fully in the back yard, and *am of this 14 foot space is
used, the property owner would noc need the three foot variance.
Motion by Kirkham to grant the request of Mr. and Mrs. Bulttena for a
Building Permit on the condition that the garage be located three feet from
the aide yard lot line, or that the application be referred to the Board of
Appeals for a variance. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
LODSCAPING AROUND BOOSTER STATION AT 62ND AND T.H. ,#65;
The City Engineer stated that Councilman Sheridan had talked to residents
living around the new booster station. Be stated these persons were concerned
with the appearance of the City booster station. The City Engineer stated
that the City could plant trees along one side of the booster station and
• plant grass in order to improve the appearance. He stated that the trees
would block the view of residents on the east side of the booster station.
The City Enginner stated that the cost of planting such a visual barrier
would be $680 and shooed layout drawing to the Council. He asked the Council
whether the City should do so. Councilman Sheridan said to go ahead.
The =council took no action upon this matter.
PiIITZUES OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PAGE 27
• ADDITICN TO CONTRACT - SS&SV#70:
The City Manager stated that Storm Sever and Sanitary Sewer and Water
Construction Project #73 -B was to provide seater service to the home of
Par. and Mrs. Walter Luckow who were ordered by the City Health Officer
to make connection to the City sanitary seater. The City Engineer stated
that the contractor who is completing work on the storm sewer and sanitary
se *r and mater project #70 is willing to do this work at the same unit
coat at which he in completing project #70. The City Engineer asked the
Consulting Engineer whether, it would be possible to add this work to
SSM#70 and obtain a supplemental assessment for the same. The City
Attorney asked whether this work is another improvement. The City
Engineer answered, "Yes ". The City Attorney stated that the City should
not snake this a supplement to the other contract, but snake it a part of
the new project.
ADDITION TO CONTRACT - S866w #13:
The City Engineer stated that Don Anderson wished to have immediate
construction of sever and mater services to his property at the cul -de -sac
on the end of 75th Avenue Northeast. He asked the City Attorney whether
it would be possible to add this portion of SS&SW #73 -B to the contract
for completion of sewer and grater services in Innsbruck 5th Addition. The
City Engineer stated that the contractor is going to do this work at the
same unit cost as under the contract for surer and water services in
Innsbruck 5th Addition.
•The Council took no action upon this matter.
N.S.S.S.D. - APPOINTMENT OF CITY INSPECTORS:
Mayor Nee stated that the North Suburban Sanitary Sewer District would like
to have the City of Fridley appoint a deputy to the N.S.S.S.D. Be stated
that the deputy would have custody of the permit applications and funds
for connection to the N.S.S.S.D. The Mayor suggested that perhaps the
Building Inspector or some clerk could be appointed deputy to the N.S.S.S.D.
The Mayor stated that this person would used to be bonded and the deputy's
signature would be needed on applications before the N.S.S.S.D. would
accept thews. Councilman Sheridan suggested,that the Plumbing Inspector
and the head of Public Works have had experience with this type of work
and should be appointed the deputy inspectors of the N.S.S.S.D.
N.S.S.S.D! NOTICE (9 AVAILABILITY OF SEWAGE CONVECTIONS;
Motion by Sheridan to recieve the communication from the N,S.S.S.D. concerning
connection to the sanitary sewage system of the N.S,S.S.D. Seconded by
Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unani=msly. .
AUTHORIZATION OF CITY Pt.ANNING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM OUTSIM WORK:
• Notion by Wright to authorize Hodue Associates to serve the Standard Oil
Company and Mr. Gerald Johnson in making plans for the 3 -3/4 acre tract
proposed for a Standard Oil Service Station at the option of and the expense
of Gerald Johnson and /or the Standard Oil Company to engage their services.
Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
1i1RMS OF OCTOBER 18, 1965
PACE 28
• LUTING AGENDA OF TEE COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMER 1 1965 AND ESTABLISHING
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OV NOVEMBER 8, 1965: .
Councilman Wright stated that he favors restricting the Council Meeting
of November 1, 1965 to the %blic Hearings and other business associated
with the Public Hearings which have been advertised in the legal newspaper,
and set the data of a special Council Meeting to consider the remaining
business of the City for November 8, 1965.
Motion by Wright to limit the agenda of the regular Council Meeting of
November 1, 1965 to the Public Hearings whi,-,h have been advertised in the
legal newspaper, and set the date of November 8, 1965 for a special
meeting of the City Council of the City of Fridley. Seconded by Sheridan.
Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOU NT:
There being no further business, Mayor Nee declared the regular Council
Meeting of October 18, 1965 adjourned at 1;22 A. M.
Respectfully submitted,
Raymond E. Bade
Swetary to the Council
:7
OFFICIAL N=C$
CITY OF FRIMM
PUBLIC HEARING
BUM THE
CITY COUNCIL
TO Wes! IT MAY COIN:
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of
the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall' at 6431
University Avenue N.E. an November 1, 1965 in the Council. Chamber at
8 :00 P.M. for the purpose of:
Consideration of p request by Dr. T. H. Lester to
resone from R -1 (single family &tolling) to CR -1
(clinics and allied laboratories) (LOA #65 -04)
the North 400.00 feet of the West 217.80 feet of
0utlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, subject to
• an aoseaent over the West 30 feet thereof for
street purposes, lying in the Northeast Quarter
(Mk) of Section 11, T -300 R -24, County of Anoka,
State of Minnesota.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter
will be heard at this meeting.
Publish: October 210 1965
October 28, 1965
0
r`-
VrLLIAM J. NES
MAYOR
2�3
ORD: NANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, MINI BY MARING A CHANGE IN ZONIIIG
DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION I. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as
hereinafter indicated.
SECTION 2. The tract or area 'within the County of Anoka and the
City of Fridley and described as:
The North 400.00 feet of the hest 217.80 feet
of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, subject
to an easement over the Test 30 feet thereof for
street purposes, lying in the Northeast Quartet
(NEk) of Section 11, T -30, R -24, County of Anoka,
State of Minnesota.
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned
District known as CR -1 (clinics and allied
laboratories).
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to
. change the official zoning map to show said
tract or area fA6 zoned district R -1 (single
family (telling) to CR -1 (clinics and allied
laboratories).
PASSED BY THE CITr OWN= OF THE CM OF FRID[Xr THIS
DAY OF . 1463.
MAYOR Villism J. Nee
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Bxunseli
Public Hsaring;
First Reading;
Second Readings
. Publish.......:
X3(1
COUNTY -STATE- --AID HIGHWAY
•
ZOA #65-04
Dr. T. H. Lester
6909 Hickory Drive,: 11 01
outlot#1 Melody
Manor 4th Add.
W. 217.80' subj. to
ease. over W. 30'. for,"
4treets.
Rezone CR-1
UU U
31
4
9 so I At 4 f
0-4
lie"
42
12-
3
rclf vie-
'S Z
0 #Ott 0
f .4
#fig
.4 -3
T
is
%Pj
34' 35
f ,,�' .:I[/ ,f :, ., �/� e ,• •• o'p {/ Oj7 :,4.1
2o w
W
0Rj\jE
4 3. of
Cn
11 1.10 8 WI 40. JP
.13
4
Z
go d 0
CONCERTO CURVE
a 01 --v 77-1
0 It
(ff
,e &
JA 11
4A ft
Zr
52 go
V -.7 LANE
jJ
e "odr! S Its
re
ow_
P
r
T. H. LESTER M. D.
6909 Hickory Dr.
Minneapolis} Minn. 55432
18 October 1965
Citv Council of Fridley
Fridley, Mimesota.
Dear Sirs:
Request is hereby submitted:to the city council
of Fridley, Minnesota for a'lmt split of the North
400.00 feet of the West 217.80 feet of Outlot 1,
Melody Manor, 4th Addition.
Such land split is for the purpose of constructing
medical buildings as allowed in zoning category CR-1.
Respect su tted,
T. H. Lester M.D.
0
2
...� o`r'�t :T�:�:� v R.. 1'565 :-Inge
• v }'i 13: e: Usizice,ari: a 4:At i.e2.,..1 .ry ki•IY�$ps' juliiwYlass and 7 . offensive Inbf3ratorier
cih,'f:'•+.�i"!',i' 1:%3 ?+.::it^'1+.E.LC.Ci'lu tJt;S .i.L"i the 5z.,..... :?"LS }1(.._:ag ) and 1•i..8.°'.C3':uTliL..1tI approval
by +- ,�12rjcjj. Up= a voice vc :e, w11 vOti'"9 :yc., the -0.otinn carried
R x ;: the s b` w3itf`h1. 1I, Sit:'.sc dins te1G rCgUiq:'.' anti z.
P- -UlAi g tsKE'ns' etc. UwS:: c l "lttcss,FaL the now ordinance
welt this Ehould be conridered
.Awnz With the
,y of the w auat ux IcIn i involved, it ryes suggested to Dr.
a lot £sTJi7 t v-fitl "lCl i, f :;1.'xad i7e'' CT 2;�' a building C 2np 't? @ "c lit CtitilCl
by is sa 06 - i.0 ^Za h < =d to bct .7 �� t`Lis ycaf, be could ask Council fox a
l ,t sp1it'a ct the f2z =i z tjw Q aA tel:: y`9I.L iri4.
�� , ° ^•' .�I.�
by by th. :-'t the planning, Commirpion
0.00 :57-Y: Of the
401, r-o desir
r7 i3
-1 j f i 'i;^!? -,» ' c't4k°�;, i3 ' ��L'• :TC�ss Upon a voice vote, all' VotinG7°.
aya' tile
m
2. C�'x � i317 ;D i'IIL'LTC Ii ??' 1.1130; 1'.S. 161 -01 S G Y��.�,SOI�i CQ.. ItFC.: Pesxsan's
Park. That p,:,rt of S'4 0:1 SM And S"V e+f SL''.. of Section 3,
lying :mast �f G.r,�C 27u��rr �i1:31rcd �/ aid East of East Liver Road.,
'Eheres was no one prase�lt fOx t h S. G. Pezrsou Company, Inc.
Iir. Edgnr Thayer, a resf-dent in the area, inquired about proposed
plant for to s area.
IIIIOZION % �7 .^ %,ran scec= �•d. b;r f .:g.,Lc, tLL' the Planting Cs +inm
ce+a�t�.zzsLyts g��.l .s. leea %ng (s .. a2 � x in ;.y plat QP -S. w'�3 -D3),
�r rov�.r Inc—, �'�is iC � ?: :� ;2C� i3 xi w 1 Par1r.) being' t�'!1�'.st Part
cf r�� '4 .w� �iiy, � ':�E,'w o Sec:ti.cra 3 ly j' -_ a.TOst of GN Rd. R/W and
x{ ating of Cctob r 14,
L (c " ROL-d 6.
1955. Upzy a a VOs_,,:e Matey c.ise t: ,Otiu3, . ca-a. 1ad.
lot 13, atad
y q
LC! L'I.". Z.`u.rLitS�iSJL J.:.'n
fj
1. ". t.4 :i'1�:�k 1Ai yu�i!:�J D:L ��:•i4 •/ di6cL4.iz this iSfathie.ro
t s�� «. that tare k'1:',ZUirg Cotaliu&iVa
s t by o ville Ratley, being
t s1s;c?s 1 3C .ltc "s Lon to r�cbww� �cc velar
of Occtobiar 14, 1965. Upon a vOi.ce vo .e,
as coy ..Vi car'2ncd.
+aT , , r ter: 2, 195 I,
)I- -!rcd that tho pa at Via gTOsent
a .a :4t time bas ,S, a"d that the Park �$ P1 a✓ gxcru�d�
`xrLdl.cy bas cnout-% pzrk preparty to uae a pLxm:neat
34
Land Plonniny 68rS Nr9hrvay fG5 uE.
Lund Survec in9 Amlwgf ls32.
SDilS Testrny E N G I N E E R I N G, MinneSofo
OW 6- Afunicipol v INC. V SUnsel4 -6066
fnjineenny En ineers Sur vec or,5
CO2tiffic a a of S mve for E: XM/ ,Uev� /o
7.$Z-- i
30
SCALT
i�� o VE14 O't'ES IRON
.E
1
E "
o !
P ' ':1
L — ^ •` 1 $2 The ,forth 400.00 acct of tile; Wcst 21 -1.60
�� 1 -ZI'1. $Z- — feet of Oul,lot 1, 1lelody ::anon 4th
... Ac:;3.]t.'LOl!, rlibjLCt t0 r371 ffascltent olver
the Vost 30 feet thereof . fo, street
P,I—I poGV J.
! hereby cerhfy -hat this /s a true and aorred representation era sarvety gCffie boundor;es - (PAe o6ar &scribed lord end
#7#je location orall bvddiny5 , !hereon , &-doll visible mcroochmenls , il!' . fnVn Or &7 Sd;d /end. As surveyed by fm /Ins f'� I :e4 t(
A'D. MC ' SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC.
Ln9in�rs fr Svrreyors
35
.
02f-Acial- Publication City of Irie le-,r
ot:�cc of a Pula is I-rearing on a 3:::a;+:"'slis e owrdi -nance to the
i.
M y f iry I. -as {."t `' _
"1
�`�'�o:+ aas t�;:: ?w: Cs'.iL O d. cc- 1 �a J ..:i::i.C+ d aZa the City of Fridley
to u00 corL— .mz city �3=0;ats for -eao cons z:Uction, installation, FLnd
r. aintc:zance o2 a :: of line;
zi d wrh� ereas on the 20th day of Sep Le:: ae_ , 1955 the City Council of
I
he City of Fridley adopted the lirst reading of a proposed ordinance
to a 1--z. ehIse all j= pursuant -moo Chapy4tex 10 of the Fridley
City darter;
2 o"L- ice- Is gi van of a. public hoaxing to cons.*Ldcr said
ordimince frt;rzah..is. - a.: t''!7,o city hall on Nov 1, 1!: 65 at v O;C loe-{ P.M.,
By order of the CS.-Ly Council. � arl P. er ucjncr
City manager oz Fridley
Dated:' oc-L-ober 4, '1965
I
I
i,
j
�i
I
�i
I
3G
ORDINANCE #
•
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO GRANT A FRANCHISE TO THE AMERICAN OIL
COMPANY TO USE CERTAIN DESIGNATED STREETS AND PROVIDING CONDITIONS FOR SAID USE.
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. 69.01 There is hereby granted to the American Oil Company, a Maryland
Corporation, its successors and assigns, for a period extending
to December 1, 1990, from and after the acceptance of this
Ordinance by the American Oil Company, and subject to the terms
and conditions herein stated, the right to lay and construct one
pipeline across and through the City of Fridley, Anoka County,
Minnesota, for the purpose of transporting petroleum products,
• along and underneath the surface of the public streets known as
53rd Avenue Northeast (easterly of 3rd Street Northeast) and 3rd
Street Northeast (between 49th Avenue Northeast and 53rd Avenue
Northeast) all within the corporate boundaries of the City of
Fridley.
SECTION 2. 69.02 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns in performing
the work shall keep the streets open to traffic at all times,
and as soon as practical after laying, repairing, and constructing
said pipeline shall restore the streets to a condition equal or
better than that existing before the commencement of the des-
cribed work.
SECTION 3. 69.03 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall lay,
• construct, operate,repair, and maintain said pipeline so as not
37
ORDINANCE # PAGE 2
to interfere with the natural drainage of the streets and so
as not to interfere with the construction or maintenance of
said streets; and said pipeline shall be laid at such depth
beneath the surface so as not to interfere with public travel.
SECTION 4. 69.04 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall lay,
construct, operate, repair, and maintain said pipeline so as
not to interfere with private entrances to land now abutting
on said streets.
SECTION 5. 69.05 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall pay
all damages to the owners of property abutting on the public
streets which such owners may sustain by reason of the laying,
repair or maintenance of said pipeline.
SECTION 6. 69.06 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall assume
all risks and liabilities for all accidents and damages that
may accrue to persons or property on account of the laying,
maintaining, repairing, and operating said pipeline, and by the
acceptance hereof, agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City of Fridley from any.and all liabilities, damages or judg-
ments, including attorneys' fees and court costs in connection
with the aforesaid.
SECTION 7. 69.07 Said pipeline shall be located and constructed to the satisfac-
tion of the City Council of said City and should construction
and operation of the streets require any alteration or change
of location of the pipeline, such alteration or change of
location shall be made by the Company, its successors, grantees
• and assigns, at its expense upon written request from the City
Council.
ORDINANCE #
PAGE 3
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY
OF 1965.
ATTEST:
Clerk
Hearing Date: November 1, 1965
Publication of Hearing: Oct. 6. 1969r
• 1st .Reading: September 20. 1965 *1
2nd Reading: *2
Publication:
Acceptance by Company:
0
William J. Nee, Mayor
*- Publication of hearing notice not less than 20 days prior to hearing.
*1- May be on date the hearing is ordered.
*2- Must be at least 20 days after public hearing and within 60 days after
public hearing.
3c
• COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC.
Consulting Engineers
1446 County Road "J"
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
u
al�
October 27, 1965
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER ONE
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 73; AND
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 73 -A
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
F. D. Chapman Constr. Co. and Randall & Berglin
2809 Alabama
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorised and directed to furnish and install,
in accordance with the attached plan sheets 1 and 2, the following sanitary
sewer, storm sewer and watermain and appurtenances in Don's 5th Addition, in
accordance with Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 73 and Sanitary Sewer
and Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project 73 -A unit prices, according
to contract:
234 LF
8" ESVCP San. Sewer 0-10' deep
@ $
310 LF
8 " "ESVCP San. Sewer 10-12' deep
@
14 LF
8" ESVCP San. Sewer 12 -14' deep
@
20 LF
8" CIP San. Sewer 10 -12' deep
@
16 Ea.
8 x 6" Wyes
@
3 Ea.
Manholes 0 -10' deep
@
1 Ea.
Manhole 12 -14' deep
@
815 LF
6" CIP Watermain (Slip -on Joint)
@
3 Ea.
6" Gate Valves & Boxes
@
1 Ea.
6" Hydrant and Valve & Box
@
2 Ea.
6 x 6 1 6" CI Tees
@
1 Ea.
6" Sleeve
@
1 Ea.
6" 450 Bend
@
3 Ea.
Wet Connections (Watermain)
@
1 Ea.
Remove and Replace 6" Hydrant, Valve & Lead (�
415 LF
12" Cl. II RCP 0-10' deep
@
120 LF
15" Cl. II RCP 0 -10' deep
@
63 LF
15" Cl. II RCP 10 -12' deep
@
5 Ea.
12" Cl. II RCP Short Radius Bends
@
9 Ea.
Standard Catch Basins
@
1 Ea.
Short Catch Basin
@
50 Sq.
Yds. Sodding /at 76th
@
1 Ea.
Comp, Will, bit. sur, Conc. Curb Rpl.
@
30 Cu.
Yds. Cl. V Mat. for Spec. Pipe Found.
@
4.10 /LF
$ 959.40
4.25/LF
1,317.50
4.35/LF
60.90
5.95/LF
119.00
12.00 /Ea.
192.00
275.00/Ea.
825.00
365.00/Ea.
365.00
3.10 /LF
2,526.50
100.00 /Ea.
300.00
320.00 /Ea.
320.00
42.50/Ea.
85.00
50.00 /Ea.
50.00
42.50/Ea.
42.50
30.00 /Ea.
90.00
200.00 /Ea.
200.00
4.80/LF
1,992.00
5.35/L6
642.Oq
5.50 /LF
346.50
25.00 /Ea.
125.00
200.00 /Ea.
1,800.00
210.00 /F.a.
210.00
1.50 /Sq.Yd.
75.00
340.00 /Ea.
340.00
6.00 /Cu.Yd.
180.00
Total Lump Sum. . . . . . . . . . $13,163.30
I -
F. D. Chapman Constr. & Randall - Berglin
Chg. Ord. #1 - Proj. 73 & 73-A
Fridley, Minnesota -2- October 27, 1965
Total Lump Sum. . . . . . . $13,163.30
Submitted and approved by Comstock & Davis, Inc. on this 27th day of
October, 1965.
COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC.
By
E. V. Comstock, P. E.
Approved this day of , 1965 by the
F. D. Chapman Construction Co. and Randall & Berglin.
F. D. CHAPM,AN CONSTRUCTION CO. AND
RANDALL & BERGLIN
By.
Title
By
Title
Approved and accepted this day of , 1965
by the City of Fridley, Minnesota.
RM /eb
11
CITY OF FRIDLEY
By
William Nee Mayor
By
Earl P. Wagner Manager
40
41
COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC.
Consulting Engineera
1446 County Road °'J"
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
October 27, 1965
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER ONE
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 70
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
F. D. Chapman Construction Co.
2809 Alabama Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized and directed to construct sanitary sewer
and watermain between East River Road and
Riverview Terrace in
the alley
approximately 260' S of Mississippi Place.
The following materials shall be furnished
and installed under
the unit prices
of the Sanitary Sewer & Water Improvement Project 70 contract:
•
100 LF 8" ESVCP San. Sewer 0-10' deep
@
$ 4.25/LF
$ 425.00
200 LF 8" ESVCP San. Sewer 10-12' deep
@
4.75/LF
950.00
64 LF 8" ESVCP San. Sewer 12 -14' deep
@
5.501LF
352.00
36 LF 8" ESVCP San. Sewer 14 -16' deep
@
6.00 /LF
216.00
7 Ea. 8" x 6" VCP Wyes
@
6.50 /Ea.
45.50
105 LF 6" VCP Sewer Service
@
3.00/LF
315.00
1 Manhole 0 -10' deep
@
240.00 /Ea.
240.00
577 LF 6" CIP Watermain (Slip -on joint)
@
3.30 /LF
1,904.10
1 Ea. 6t1 Gate Valve & Box
@
100.00 /Ea.
100.00
1 Ea. 6" Hydrant & Valve
@
305.00/Ea.
305.00
2 Ea. 6 x 6 x 6" C.Y. Tees
@
39.00 /Ea.
78.00
1 Ea. 61/ Sleeve
@
25.00 /Ea.
25.00
1 Ea. 6" 11 -1 /40 Bend
@
50.00 /Ea.
50.00
7 Ea. Corporation Cocks
@
5.00 /Ea.
35.00
7 Ea. Curb Stops and Boxes
@
15.00 /Ea.
105.00
110 LF 1" Copper Water Service Line
@
2.00 /LF
220.00
1 Comp, Conn, Will, & bit. our. repl.,
@
600.00 /Ea.
600.00
1 Ea. 'Wet Connection at E.R.Rd.
@
30.00 /Ea.
30.00
20 Cu.Yds. Foundation Corr. Mat.
@
6.00 /Cu.Yd.
120.00
Total
Lump Sum. . . . . . .
.$6,115.60
-WOO 4
11
•
F. D. Chapman Constr. Co. -2- October 27, 1965
Chge. Ord. #1 - Proj. 70
Fridley, Minn.
Total Lump Sum. . . . . . . . .$6,115.60
Submitted and approved by Comstock & Davis, Inc. on this 27th day of
October, 1965.
COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC.
By
E. V. Comstock, P. E.
Approved this day of , 1965 by the F. D. Chapman
Construction Co.
F. D. CHAPMAN CONSTRUCTION CO.
By
Title
Approved and accepted this day of , 1965
by the City of Fridley, Minnesota.
I(Ktcb
CITY OF FRIDLEY
By
William Nee Mayor
Bp
Earl P. Wagner Manager
4fo!
is
442
APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT
Permit No.
Location S5-Z 7
Fridley, Minn...
FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS:
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein speci-
fied, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rul-
ings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and re-
presentations stated in this application are true and correct.
Owner r fZ
Kind of Building
Used as1,�1��.9��/%
Work to be completed abo 19
Estimated Cost $ , f f%fJ e r') —
DESCRIPPION
How Installed: Flatwise on El L y 4) Extended out from Wall Roof
Dimensions: Length Height Z2 , Thickness
Distance from Sidewalk Roof
Constructed of: J( Iron, Wood, Iron and Wood
IlluminatedS
Wiring Application No.
Signed
By -
0
RNSO UTION roe
A 29NWTION RMXVUW THE 4REi.IMI Uff RZP=T Alm
CAMING A P=1C HEJUM ON TU MATTER OF THE
C=SMCTION OF CERTAIN STRUT
Pit6jwr ST, 1966 -1
SAS, the construction of certain improvements is deemed
to be-in the interest of the City of Fridley and the property owners
affected thereby.
SE IT ROOLYM, by the City Council of the City of Fridley
as follows:
1. That the preliminary report submitted by the City
Engineer is hereby received and accepted.
2. That this Council will meet on the 15th day of
November, 1965 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. at the City
Sall in the City of Fridley for the purpose of
holding a Public Hearing on the improvement noted
• in the Notice attached hereto and made a part
thereof by reference, Bshibit "A ".
3. That the area proposed.to be assessed for said
Improvements and each of them as noted in said
notice are all the lands- and areas as noted in
said notice; all of the sane to be assessed
proportionately according to the benefits received.
4. That the City Manager is authorized and directed to
Siva notice of such Public Hearing by publishing a
notice thereof in the official newspaper . of the City
of Fridley according to law, auch notice to ba
substantially in the form and substance of the notice
attached hereto as Euhibit "A".
ADO TO BY THE cn? comm OF THE CITY or lR usy, ?8X8
Wy or
• !OR a iti Ilan J. item
•TY68'rs
CYr Marl P. Wagner
i
4�
OFBICUL MMTCATIOId
CITY OF IRIMIRY
(Exhibit A)
NOTICE or H81=11 �an IMPROVF��N'1'S
r ■ �. r■rrrr�r ■
STRSBT IMPR PRQM ST. 1966 -1
w.�.■.r.rr r ..�.r
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County,
Minnesota, has deemed it necessary, and ezpedient that the improvements
hereinafter described be made.
NOW, THEREFORS, 1WTICE IS HMUMY GIVEN THAT on the 15th day of
November, 1965, at 8 :00 o'clock P.M., the City Council will meet at the
City Hall in said City, and will at said time and place hear all parties
interested in said improvements in whole or in part.
The general nature of the improvements in the construction (in the
lands and streets noted below) of the following improvements, to -wit:
• CONSTRUCTYON ITEM
A. Street improvements, including grading,, stabilized base, bitnminour
surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, and storm sever system and
senitary ewer services and other facilities located as follows:
Kimball Street - Riverview Terrace to Best River Road
Janesville Street - Riverview Terrace to East River Road
Ironton Street - Riverview Terrace to zest River Road
Hugo Street - Riverview Terrace to zest River Road
Glencoe Street - Riverview Terrace to last River Road
Riverview Terrace • Glencoe Street to Kimball Street
Broad Avenue - Glencoe Street to Hugo Street
Broad Avenue - Hugo Street to Kimball Street
75th Avenue - Old Central Avenue to Bacon Drive
Service give along Z. of university - 73rd Ave. to 75th Ave.
Proposed Street Madison Street - Lyric Lane to Osborne Road
69th Avenue - East River Road to Hickory Drive
Hickory Drive including Hickory Circle - 69th Way to 70th 'Way
Hickory Place - Hickory Drive to 70th Way
East-West Easement South of Mississippi Place - Riverview
Terrace to East River Road
Pierce Street - .Starting 700' South of Mississippi Street to
63rd Avenue
63rd Avenue - Pierce Street to State Aid Street #302 in
• Shorewood Shopping Center
ithibit A
St. 1966 -1
Page
• Lucia Lane - 2901 South of 68th Place to 68th Place
68th Place - Lucia Lane West to Services Road
Service Dive Fast of T.II. #65 - 68th Place to 68th Avenue
Service Drive East of T.H. #65 - Shorewood Lounge to 63rd Avenue
McKinley Street - 66th Avenue to 66h Avenue
66h Avenue - Alley between Fridley Street and McKinley Street
to Stinson Blvd.
Fridley Street - Mississippi Street to 67th Avenue
Anoka Street - Mississippi Street to 67th Avenue
66th Avenue - McKinley Street to Stinson Blvd.
66th Aver - Arthur Street to McKinley Street
Stinson Blvd. - 66th Avenue to 66k Avenue
Stiuson.Blvd. - Mississippi Street to 66Cn Avenue
Longfellow Street - East River Road to Railroad Tracks
East River Road East Service Drive - 79th Avenue to Liberty Street
Ely Stream - Ruth Street to Railroad Tracks
Ruth Street Liberty Street to Ruth Circle
Liberty Street - East River Road to Railroad Tracks
Alley between 4th & 5th Streets - 53rd Avenue to 54th Avenue
B. Storm serer and appurtenances in and serving the area bounded as:
Commracing at the intersection of Pearson Way and East River Road,
thence North along East River Road to a point on the westerly
extension of the South boundary of Bourdesux's Spring Brook
• Addition; thence East along said South boundary of Bourdeaux'F
Spring Brook Addition to the Southeast corner of said Bourdeaux'F
Spring Brook Addition; thence North along the East line of said
Bourdeaux's Spring Brook Addition to the Northeast corner of said
Bourdeauxes Spring Brook Addition; thence East along the easterly
extension of the North line of Bourdesux's Spring Brook Addition
to the West boundary of the Great Northern Reilvay Right of Way;
thence South along said West Right of flay line of the Great
Northern Railroad to a point located 440 feet (4001) as measured
along the West Right of Way line, south of the centerline of
79th Avenue; thence [lest in a straight line to the point of begin -
ning, thence toreinating. All lying in Section 3, T -30, R -24,
County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
3STCOST . I . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.oYs
THAT TITS ARM PRDPOSSD TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID ' IZVEMKtTt IS AS F= M$-.
For Construction Item A. Above - - • - - - - - • • - - -
All of the land abutting upon said streets named above and all lands
within, adjacent and abutting thereto.
for Construction item B. Above - - • - • - • 40 - • - r •
46
E
U
0
Exhibit A
St:. 19661
Page Three
The area proposed to be assessed for
a portion of the cost of the impmvement is
the area above described.
such improvement for all or
the property contained within
All of said land to be asaessesd proportionately according to the
benefits received by such improverents.
That the Council proposes to proceed with each of said improve-
ments as separate I revemente, except as hereafter otherwise provided
by the Council, all under the following authority, to -wit: Minnesota
Statutes 1961, Chapter 429 and leers amendatory thereof, and in conformity
with the City Charter.
DnED THIS DAY OF WVMMZR, 1965 BY ORDER OF THE CYTY COUNCIL
ATPBsT:
CtV M - Earl P. Wagner
Publish: November 3, 1965
November 10, 1965
MAYOR • Willies J. Nee
w
A RZOOLUTY0N R2CXIV= THE P'RILIMMRY RSPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC
BUR= (W THE MATTER OF THZ CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN 3MPRbVEM "MTN
MCNICIPAL STATE AID STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1966 -2.
NPiMUS, the construction of certain improvements is deemed to
be in the interest of the City of Fridley and the property owners
affected thereby.
BE IT RUMVS®, by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
as follower
1. That the preliminary report submitted by the City Engineer,
Nasim Qurashi, is hereby received and accepted.
2. That this Council will most on the 15th day of November, 1965,
at 8200 o'clock P.M. at the City Sall in the City of Fridley
for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing on the improvement
noted in the Notice attached hereto and made a part thereof by
reference, Exhibit "A ".
• 3. That the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and
each of them as noted in said notice are all the lends and areas
as noted in said notice4 All of the some to be assessed
proportionately according to the benefits received.
•
4. That the City Manager is authorized and directed to give notice
of such Public Hearing by publishing a notice thereof in this
official newspaper of the City of Fridley according to law, such
notice to be substantially in the form and substance of the notice
attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
ADOPT@ By THE CITY COUNCIL OV TOR CITY OF FRIDL.EY THIS
DAY or 1965.
ATTW s
CITT 6w e tr in C. srunse 1
MltYOR - William J. NN
48
CITE' O' 1+YxCl ft
(Exhibit A)
WOTICE Opp HKAZING O IMOVOCM
WSMUS, they City Council of the City of pridloy, Anoka County,
Minn*aota, has deeem4 it neeceaasa9ry ssnd expedient that the improvements
hereiciaftcr deracribed be madee.
NOWQ `xii RMW, W'7ICC. XS IMMY GInK TUT ern -the, 15th day of
November, 1465, at 8200 o ° clock P.M. the City Cauneci% will meet at
the City Hall In said City, and will at said tines and pl?ace hear all
parties interested in said improvem.nts in what* or in part.
The general nature of the improvements is the construction
(in the lands and streets notaed below) of tho following improve=
meents, to-wit.
COWST9Zt. °.Cr1m Y7I'faTii
• A, Street improvo mentse, including grading, +stabilixeffid base,
bituminous seiurfaping, concrete zuxb gaud gutter, storm sewer
system and rappurtoat &ut faeilitteees, located an follows-.
() Wiea.t Moore lAke Drive
.(State kid No o 302 )
(2) Wat Moore lAke Drive
(Stater$ .Aid No. 302)
(3) Rice d:7v- ,o &k_R@' &d ,
(4) Aahtau Avenue
CzarolS, Drive to Baker Avenue
k*r Atm nua to T.N. #65
T.H.4 65 to old ,entrap
74th Way to Ironton Street
ESTINAm o o u . . o . . e e o e e e n . . e • s. w 1 01", "7.67
TUT TILL AREA i'H6VOM TO BE ASSES i FOR SAID I s Is As
»tee
por Construction Item A above ----------------------------------
All, of the lanai abutting upon said streets named above and all
Brands within, adjacent and abutting thereto.
•
•
All of said land to be assessed proportionately according to the benefits
received by such improvements.
That the Council proposes to proceed with each of said improvements as
separate improvements, except as hereafter otherwise provided by the
Council all under the following authority, to wit; Minnesota Statutes
1961, Chapter 429 and laws amendatory thereof, and in conformity with
the City Charter.
DATED THIS DAY OF , 1965, BY
ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR e William J. Nee
Publish: Fridley 8dition of The Records
. November 3, 1965
November 10, 1965
•
5()
• RESOLUTION NO. Z
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPR0VKUNT AND FINAL PLANS AND 8PID MCATIONS -
WATER, SANITARY SBW I AND STORK SEWER PROJSlCT NO. 73-B
WHEREAS, Resolution #175.1965 of the City Council adopted the
20th day of September 1965, set the date for hearing on the proposed
improvements, as specifically noted ip the Notice of Hearing attached
hereto for reference as 9zhibit "A ", and
WHMMS, all of the property owners vbose property is 114b_10 to
be assessed with the making of these 1wprovee,ents (as noted in said
notice) were given ten (10) days publiehed'notice of the Couftil•
Hearing through two (2) weekly publications-of the required notice, and
the hearing was held and the property ovmers heard thereon at the hearing,
as noted In said notice.
NOW, THMMFOBS, BE IT WOLVED, By the Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the following improvements proposed by Council
Resolution #175 -1965 are hereby ordered to be affected
and completed as soon as reasonably possible to-wit.
• a. All of the improvements as noted in the notice of
hearing on the same as are noted (in Exhibit "A")
in said notice, except Item A, 3 (ewer on Osborne Road).
That the work above may be consolidated with other areas
as one improvement.
2. The work to be performed under this project may be
performed under one or more contracts as may be domed
advisable upon receipt of bids.
3. Comstock and Davis, Inc., Consulting fgineers, are
hereby designated as the Engineers for this improvement.
They shall prepare final plans and specifications for
the making of such improvement.
ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRmEY THIS
DAY OF . 1%5.
MAYOR - Williams J. Nee
ATTEST:
CITY C MM - Marvin C. Brunsell
111
"'APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MnMSOTA
OWNER'S NANE BUILDER oe��/��/
ADDRESS ADDRESS �� 6 c
/ LOCATION OF BUILDING
No. b d 7 Street Part of Lot
LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
Corner Lot `Inside LOT Setback Jp / �' l� Side -Yard
SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION
Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed
building location drawn on these Certificates.
DESCRIPTION 0 BUILDTNP
To be-used as •
Front Depth Height
Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft.
Front Depth Height
Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft.
Type of Construction Estimated Cost
To be completed
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified,
agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances
and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts
and representations stated in this application are true and correct.
— / CIA C I SZGNATME I /1 Z 'le
(Schedule of Fee Costs can be,found on the Reverse Side).
I*
5 3
October 27, 1965
City Council Village of Fridley
RE; Rebuilding property at 6801 -7th. St. N.E.
The undersigned, owner of above property requests permission to reduce
the 35 foot frontage requirement to 30'7" We wish tm add a front foyer
entrance to our present home. Please find enclosed our original plans
with plat measurements, and our new plans with foyer addition.
9
Thank you,
William Saxton