04/10/1967 - 5936,
I '
'
�
'
COUNCIL SECRETARY - MARY LU STROM
SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING -
AGENDA - APRIL 10, 1967
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
��
�
�
' �
SPECIAL PUBLZC HEAIt?"NG Nu�E3'ING - APRIL 10, 1967 - 8 P.Ni.
ROLL CALL•
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
PUBLIC HE�IRING •
l. Qn Rezoning - R-1, R-2, & C-2 to M-2, Boise-
Cascade Property, 30 minutes
NE�9 BUSINESS •
2. Bids - W-83 (Opened Noon, April 10, 1967),
15 minutes
3. Proposed Park Property Purchase, 20 minutes
(9:05 P.M.)
4. Letter and ResoJ.ution from Rice Creek Associ-
ation, 10 minutes
5. Certificates oi Appointment -- F.H.R.A., 2
minutes
6. Lot Split - LS1�67-01 - Parks, l0 minutes
7. Two Family Dwelling - 7541 University Avenue
Northeast, 10 minutes
ADJOURN•
(9:37 P.M.)
Pages 1 - 5.
Pages 6 - 9.
Pages 10 & 1Z.
pages l2 - 15.
` J /��/,/��
� ��`
SPFCIAL PUBLI� T-�?�.fLING I��ETING AG�NDA - APRIL 1Q, 1967 - 8
PUBLIC HEARIDTG:
L ��
� . � �_ el�
-�_
P.M.
l. ON P�EZONING - R-1, R-2, & C-2 TO r2-2, BOISE-CASC�IDE PROPERTY:
The publa.c hearing notice is on Pages 1 and 2, and a dra�ving
of the proposed rezoning is on Page 3. The ordinance, if you
wish to consider it for first reading, is on Pages 4 and 5.
The Pl�.nning Comm�.ssion's recommendai:ion is not available at
this v�riting, since the Pub].ic Hearing before the Planning
Commission wi.11 not be r�eld until tonight. However, I will
have;'an excerpt of their minutes available for you at the
meeting.
NEW BUS:CI�rESS -
' 2. BIDS - W-83 (OPENED NOON, APP.IL 10, 1967j: These bids are for
the water reservoix repair, and I will have a tabulation and
recommendation for you at the meeting.
3. PROPOSED PARK PROPERTY PURCHASE: On Page 6 is a descrinti.on
of the property� and the appraisal is on Page 7o On Page 8 is
a description of the adjoining piece o� property and its ap-
praisa]. is on Page 9. You may recall that Don Fonta�.ne adver-
tised 10 acres at $500.00 per. acre, which would amount to
$5,000.00. He advised that he would take $4,700.00 for it on
the basis t'nat he has 10 acres. If he dad have 10 acres, the �
apprais�r's value of $450,00 per acre on Page 7 would amount
to $4,500.00, so that the $4,700.00 would be a compromise
between the Ca.ty's appraisal and h is original asking priceo
If the Council offered him the $4,700.00, it would amount to
more than $450.00 per acre if the appraiser's measurements of
8.56 acres are accurate. On the second piece, Council.man Harris
advised that NIr. Siverts wanted $500.00 per acre. The appraiser's
value on Page 9 amounts to more than $50�.00 per acre, so I
would assume that it would be satisfactory in price to Mr. Siverts.
Council's action would be to give the City N:anager direction
relative to the price you wish to offer as a final offer.
4.
5.
I.�TTER AND RESOLUT20N FROM RICE CREEK ASSOCIATZON: Mayor
Kaskham asked that I place the letter on Page 10, and the Reso-
lution on Page 1J., on this agenda.
CERTIFICATES OF APPOINTI�NT -- F.H.R.A.: The four certif�,cates
of appointment on Pages ].2 Lhrough 25 can be receivecl and filed
by the Cauncil. 2 h�ve forwarded a caxbon copy to each one of
the appointees.
,
SP�CIAL PUBLZC HEARING NLETING AGENDA - APRIL 10, 1967 - 8 P.M.
, (Continued)
I
6. LOT SPLIT - LS�67-01 - PARKS: I wil]. have drawings, and an
� excerpt oi the Planning Comrnission Meeting Minutes of April
6th for you at the meeting.
, 7. TWO FAMILY D��7ELLSNG - 7541 UNNERSITY AVENUE N.E.: I will
have an excerpt of the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
of Apri1 6th for you at the meeting.
� �
�
�
�
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Pi�BLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
�Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the
City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University
Avenue N.E. on April 10, 1967 in the Council Chamber at 8:00 P.M, for the
purpose of:
Consideration of a request by Boise-Cascade Coxporation (ZOA ��67-03)
to rezone the following described parcels:
A. Rezone from R-1 (single family dwellings) to M-2 (heavy industrial)
the following described parcels:
1) The South 50 feet of the North 83 feet of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 12, except the West 360 feet thereof. .
2) The North 50 feet of the South 83 feet of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 12, except the West 50 feet thereof.
B. Rezone from C-2 (general business areas) to M-2 (heavy industrial)
the following described parcel:
The North 173 feet of the West 360 feet of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 12, except the North 33 feet and the West 50 feet taken for
street purposes.
C. Rezone from R-Z (limited multiple family dwellings) to M-2 (heavy
industrial) the following described parcel:
Co�nencing ati the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 12, thence East 50 feet along the South
line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the actual
point of beginning, thence North parallel to the West line of said
Northwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter to a point 173 feet South of
the North line of said Northwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter, thence
East 205 feet parallel to said North line, thence South 770 feet
parallel to the West line of said Northwest Quarter of Southeast
Quarter, thence in a Southwesterly direction back to the actual point
of beginning, thence texminating.
All located in Section 12, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka,
State of Minnesota.
�
I� Public Hearing
ZOA ��67-03
Page 2
I�� Being generally located South of 73rd Avenue, East of Central Avenue,
North of 69th Avenue and West of East Ciry Limits.
It is the intent of this rezoning request to have the entire Southeast
� Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24 zoned M-2 (heavy industrial areas)
except the following parcels taken for street purposes: 1) The North 33 feet
thereof; 2) The West 50 feet thereof; 3) The South 33 feet thereof.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be
heard at this meeting.
JACK 0. KIRKHAM
MAYOR
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Publish: March 24, 1967
March 31, 1967
� •
�
�
�
�
�
�
I�
s�
�_
I
I�
I�
�
� ` �.
:', � o ' -
2. �, --�--
!" = I
^! � `: �
~- r •;
'- 1 �' C.
\.
�. i
I
�"_ � r
ZOA ��67-03
Boise-Cascade Corp.
Southeast Quarter of Section 12
-------------- --------------------------- -----
�3," ,���/�=i�;IJE N. E, •
5 O ,—�T r , A —..-- ---Z o.vr p --� ' --- -----�--
�
� ,
�� � 1
. . : . . .. .._!�--.-�
% /" �- 'j
r�C ,�-� �`• �Y. �'-j
•?
4 �
l�
,` '
� � , i 1
I %.
�� � ; i
.
. ;,
,:
��:_ _ _ _
__ _ __ __ .
� , _ ___. __ ____ _ __ _ _ __ _-__ _�_
�� � ;
, ; . . s��;, i�
� ; � � �� � �.,, ��, ,
r��� �.����--.� �� � ��
� ,, ,,
a� �.;�',`',% ,'` � �' ` /�t
� ,` ,`��\ �^ , �
� L , !` `1 _.. ,\
� . ( � ' vo � �-_ �` � i I
j qT�.._ �OT„ ���� 1
� ( S�� ��
I- ..&�,��AN \ ,._ �"\ y` � / ' � ' � .
i � ' _�\��!_�'�__ � J��'-�/�L i'i �,�. �.�
� � � `� � ��'1 q\�\�l/.� ~
I .Y �',
! � �_�T: �
; �w�;� �\
j ` . V _ -���
, ``` ,,�,� � � �,�� 1 � �
� , � __,:. , �-� ,,
�z� � „
� � ''� �T' '
� � \�
\ �
!-- • -- ----- -- -- \� �. '
�_ � _______ _ _ _ _ _: _ __ __- -- --.
_L_ SU ' �r'Qt fr= ! Zv.�� . v � \ _ _.,_.._.
_ __ _ _ � — — - ---. _, .- — - - _.
� � _, �• �=. � -- n,, � _ _ , � � _
:�.� , ,_ � . .
� � •--------_ ..— ---_ ---------- __--- ---------- ------ - \�
r--
' \
� F
I,
3/15/67
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE TO AM�'ND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY,
MINNESOTA BX MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS�
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter
indicated.
SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of
Fxidley presently zoned as R-1 (single tamily dwellings) and
described as:
a) The South 50 feet of the North 83 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 12, except the West 360 feet thereof,
b) The North 50 feet of the South 83 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 12, except the West 50 feet thereof,
Is hereby designated to be in the zoning district M-2
(heavy industrial).
SECTION 3. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of
Fridley presently zoned as C-2 (general business areas) and
described as:
The North 173 feet of the West 360 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 12, except the North 33 feet and the West
50 feet taken for street purposes,
Is hereby designated to be in the zoning district M-2 (heavy
industrial).
SECTION 4. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of
Fridley presently zoned as R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings)
and described as:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, thence East SO feet along
the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
to the actual point of beginning, thence North parallel to the.
West line of said Northwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter to a
point 173 feet South of the North line of said Northwest Quarter
of Southeast Quarter, thence East 205 feet parallel to said North
line, thence South 770 feet parallel to the West line of said
Northwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter, thence in'a Southwesterly
direction back to the actual point of beginning, thence terminating.
All located in Section 12, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of
Anoka, State of Minnesota.
�
Ord, No.
Section 12
Boise Cascade Corp.
SECTION 5.
It is the intent of this rezoning request to have the entire
Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24 zoned
M-2 (heavy industrial areas) except the following parcels
taken for street purposes: 1) The North 33 feet thereof;
2) The West 50 feet thereof; 3) The South 33 feet thereof.
The Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official
zoning map to indicate the above zoning changes.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'TY OF FRIDLEY THIS
� DAY OF , 1967.
MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell
Public Hearing: April 10, 1967
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publish.......
�
c�
.:
LEC�AL :
Parcel T/620
NAI���E :
Donald L. Fon�;aine
SrZE:
8.56 acres
CONTOUR: �
The land is lor� and subject to floodin�.
It is located on Rice Creek.
ZONING:
R-1
BEST US�, : �
The best use of this lan� ti•;ould �e for
park purposes,
��
CALCULATIOr1S
� A N D
��
S U M M A T I 0 rI S
LAND:
8.55 1 �1�5a.00 ---____------------------' � 3,825.00
Estimated market value of th�s
appraisal is -------------------------- � 3,825.00
Plus special. assessments if any.
�- � �/�
By : . -;� : 1!� , -f / .// � ,
F. �T, a ���,, :, •5.�,. - I.r'.�,-C, -
Realtot - �UbT�aiser
0
►�
L�Gar, :
Pt of Parcel �0��0
NAME:
SIZE:
I. T. Siverts, Jr.
3.6 acres
a
COAITOUR :
This 1.and is 1.o��r �.nd subject to flooding.
Rice Creek flotiars thraugh it.
ZONIr1G :
R-1
BEST US�, :
Park purposes.
�
t'�
i
LANll:
CALCULATIOTJS
.....,�a_,-- — — - _.
A N D
SUA�MATI ONS
3.6 acres
1.0 acre of semi-high land
1.0 acre � $1,].00o00 ------------------ �, 1,�OO.OU
2. E> 2.c?'es - ].Ot�
2.6 acres @ �1T50o00 ------------------- � 1,170.00
Estimated marke� value of this
- parcel is -------------------------------- $ 2,27�.00
P1.us special assessments if any.
B �•/ i / /.
Y �,.T %� .: // �
F. Pd. S�i?i'i'er, �C:S.�F';A,C,—
Real.tor - Appraiser
�
�
�
�
r ��
� i ` � .t'r
f,
F� ,: �
�
` � �� �
1 \ ; � �'
��` rr•
� ' .
�
March 30, 1967
�
The Honorable Mayor of Fridley
� and City Councilmen
Fridley, Minnesota
' Gentlemen:
i A general meeting for the Rice Creek Association of Fridley was held on
Tuesday, March 28th. The result of this meeting was a unanimous decision
to promote, in any possible way, the formation of a Rice Creek Watershed
' District.
We have enclosed a copy of the resolution voted on at this meeting and
, respectfully request your consideration and aid in establishing a Watershed
District. -
�
� �
, Yours very truly,
'� , =---z � !� = �� v�..
' H ward W. Grivna
261 Rice Creek Terrace
, Mimzeapolis, Minnesota 55432
�
'
I
,1
�t �
�; � b
_ �. � .
�
,
A RESOLU'TION REGAIZDING A
RICE CREEK WATERSI-�LD DISTRICT
BE IT RESOLVED, I�y the R�ce Creek Association of Fridley, Anoka
County, Minnesota, that:
,' WHEREAS, the purpose of this organization is to preserve, maintain,
protect and promote the natural beauty and constant uniform flow of
� Rice Creek; and �
�
�
WHEREAS, the Rice Creek Watershed e:�compasses parts of four
counties and in excess of 30 loca� governments , all except Fridley, being
upstream from Fridley; and .
. WHERE�S, the mose efficient means of assuring coordinated develop-
� ment of the Watershed in keeping with our purpose is through the Minnesota
Watershed Act.
� NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, by action of the membership at a
general meeting Yield at Fridley iIigh School on March 28, 1967 at 8:00 P. M.
that this Association will promcr_e in any possible way or action, to form a
I Rice Creek Watershed Distric� as per procedures set forth in the IVIinnesota
VVatershed Act and amendments thereto.
�
1
1
:-�' �_
Howard Grzvna, Chairman
� �� � �
.,P R..,,..Q �, �--�
on y
or
rangeio,
� ,.
son,
rman
ry -Treas�irer
r at I�arge
1 ��; � �, ��
�-.� . �� �2���--.�
Ing S� �c�rt' s, Ufficer at L��xge
, �
�
�
I�
� `.�°
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY G� RA24SEY )
CE�TIriCA�E OF FILING
APPOINTMENT OF CO:�iMISSIGNER
This is to certify that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1961,
Section 462.425, Subd. 7, and Section 462.711 as amended by Minnesota
Laws 1965, Chapeer 704, a certified copy of the appointment of
� CARL PAULSON as a Commissioner of
the FRIDLEY, MiNNESOTA Housing and Redevelopr►ent
�
'
,
�
,
Authority was filed with the Department of Busfness Development acti:i�
as State Housing Commission on March 29, 1967 , a true and
correct copy of whfch is attached hereto>
DEPARTASEI�T OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
'1 �
/ /�� �� ,�� .
//!.•'_ �' / . _ ', :�.••.�__ •
State Director�of Housing
and Redevelopment
DaCed: A,pril 3. 1967
On this 3 day of April , 19 67 ,
before me, personally appeared, Al1an E. Anderson,
to me known to be the State Airector of Housing
and Redevelopment and on oath stated tha�:. he
executed the foregoing instrument, and that he
is authorized to execure same on behalf of ehe
Department of Business Development.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto
I, affixed on this �_day of AQril � 1g67 •
�--�-� �f � ;��:_�_�_.� ,
�� __ �
Notary PublicRams�v County, N;innesota "
i , i�y Gommission Expires � �
,
�
II '
�'"
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
CE�2TIFICATE OF FILING
APPOINTMENT Or CO:,�IISSIGNER
This is to certify Chat pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1961,
Section 462a425, Subd. 7, a.nd Section 462.711 as amended by Minnesota
Laws 1965, Chapter 704, a certified copy of the appointment of
DONALD J. MIJRI as a Commissioner of
Che �'RIDLEY, MINNESOTA Housing and Redevelopment
Authority was �iled with the Department of Business Development acting
as State Housing Commission on March 29, 1967 : a true and
correct.copy of which is attached heresoe
DEPaRTMENT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
/'�� � ._.._��
��
/ /:� •, ,. � /,.. _ �....
State DirecCor of Housing
and Redevelopment
Dated: t�pril 3. 1967
On this �_ day of �pril , 1967 ,
before me, personally appeared, Al2an E. Anderson,
to me known to be the State Director of Housing
and Redeveloprnent and on oath stated tha� he
executed the foregoing instrument, ancl that he
is authorized to execute same on behalf of the
Department of Business Development.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto
� aifixe � n this ��day o£ �pr�� , 19 67 ,
��`_-���' J ���.�
' ' Notary`Public_Ramsev County, Minnesota
24y Commissio_n Expires�
II ,
'
� ��
�.P . ,
STAT� OF MINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
CE2xIFICATE OF FILING
APPOINTMENT OF CO:�Il+'lISSIGNER
This is to certify that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1961,
Section 462.425, Subd. 7, and Section 462.711 as amended by Minnesota
Laws 1965, Chapter 7'04, a certified copy of Che appointment of
STAN W CARLSON as a Commissioner. of
the FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Housing and Redevelopment
Authority was filed with the Department of Business Development acti:�g
as State Housing Commission on Maxrh 99s 19 7 , a true and
correct copy of which is attached hereto.
DEPARTASE�IT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
,'% %! / ,. •%•.� i-_�
r,,,%,.. .., � r . _._.
M� State Director of Hausing
and Redevelogment
Dated: April 31 1967
On this �_ day of �pril + lg{�Z�,.�
before me, personally appeared, Allan E. Anderson,
to me known to be the State Director Qf Housfng
and Redevelopment and on oath stated that he
executed the foregoing instrument, and that he
is authorized to execute same on behalf of the
Department of Business Development.
� Witness my hand and official seal hereto
affixed on this 3 day of Anril , 1967 •
_� � � /
� � .t,c�_-��. •1 ./��-c`�--L--�_���_�
' Notary'Public Ramsev County, Minnesota�
i�y Commission Expires_
I��
'
I
,� ,,�
0
fn �
Y �"`
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
CE2TIFICATE OF FILING
APPOINTMENT Or COMMISSTONER
Thfs is to certity that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1961,
Sectfon 462.425, Subd. 7, and Section 462.711 as amended by Minnesota
Laws 1965, Chapter 704, a certified copy of the appointment of
M. M. MAHURIN as a Commissioner. of
Che FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Housing and Redevelopment
Authority was filed with the Departraent of Business Development acti:�g
as State Housing Commission on March 29 19 „Z _, a true and
correct copy of which is sttached hereto.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
- j,�, � r�� ,, .;,�,, �____,..�
� � State Director of Housing
and Re3evelopment
Dated:_ Anril 3, 1967
On this 3 day of A,��,i� , 19�� ,
before me, personally appeared, Allan E. Anderson,
to me known to be the State DirecCor of Housing
and Redevelopment and on oath stated that he
executed the foregoing instrument, and that he
is suthorized eo execute same on behalf of the
Department of Business Development.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto
' affixed on this 3 day of April , 19 67 .
� , ? �/
%� ,
-`'� �.crz_ � --ft �J �;�--�`.��..--^ .
, Notary Public Ramsev Courity, Minqesot.a;
i4y Commission Expires ,k , - ,,.,,,.,�.i„�,�, �.'��n.
Ni`l G�:��;��i��'�^, �x,;irat F-h. �. 1�310.
' .
'
I� �
�
�. �
Planning Conmiission Meeting - April 6, 1967 Page 2
].. PUBLIC H�ING: F.�ZONING REQUEST (ZOA �r67-03) BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION:
Rezone to M-2 all that part ot SE� of Section 12 not presently zoned M-2.
Present, representing the petitioner, were Larry Griffith and Robert
Aspelin, Operation Manager of Studebaker Corporation --
�-
The notice of the public hearing was read by the City Manager.
Chairman Hughes explained that the procedure at a public hearing is to
allow the petitioner to describe his desired change, then to give the
Commissian the oppoxtunity to ask questions of the petitioner, and then to
make time available to the public for questions.
Mr. Griffith stated Boise Cascade Corporation owns the land, and he
is representing Studebakex Corporatian who has taken an option on the land
with the idea of possible construction of a new plant site on the pxoperty.
Briefly, the rezoning is to reconcile the Northwest corner and the two 50
foat strips on the north and south of the parcel which were once used as a
setback guaxd. He stated they hoped that Studebaker wi11 be able to build
out here. The plans are still tentative, and because we are only under an
option, the plans which we have are somewhat preliminary. 'ltao maps, one
an architect's preliminary conception of the exterior view of the proposed
buildings, and a blue print of proposed buildings and landscaping, were put
on the wall. Mr. Griffith introduced Mr. Aspelin who would answer questions
of the Commi.ssion and public.
Chairman :Iughes mentioned that the Conm►ission, in considering rezoning
requests of this type, while preliminary plans are of interest, must cansider
this in terms of the impact of the change on the land.
Member Erickson asked what they have in mind for the use of the building.
Mr. Aspelin answered the owners are manufacturers of engines and generators
and primarily this is what we would be doing here. We checked your code ,.
and we know that we can live within the code.
Regarding landscaping, Mr. Aspelin stated there is a gxove of trees
which we would like to keep, will have grass and shrubs along 73rd Avenue,
Central Avenue and to the east end of the building. There would be no
outside storage as the product is not such that can sit outside.
Regarding access, there wi11 be three on 73xd Avenue and two on
Central.
In answer to the question if he could comment as to what the remainder
of this one quarter section would be devoted to, Mr. Aspelin said that we
are going to use all of the 1900 feet coming down to the railroad tracks,
but as fax as future development at this point, we do not know.
The approximate footage of the structures is 400,000 square feet for
the planc. and 100,000 square feet, including office buildings, which will
havP three floors. , •
Paul L. King, 1301 Norton Avenue N.E.: You mentioned that you would
have a dock coming out onto Central Avenue.
�_ �
Plannin� Commission Meeting - A�ril 6, 1967 Page 3
Mr. Aspelin replied �hat a road will be put in through the central part
of the property to the docks, but the traffic will come out on Central
Avenue.
Mrs. Michael Silk, 7006 Pleasant View Drive, Mounds View: Will there
be any type of fumes? Answer: The only thing would be the steam in the
winter time, but that does not contaminate the air.
Mrs. Silk; How much trucking? Answer: There are seven truck docks
on the main plar.t and three in the other. I presume we have twenty-five �r
thirty trucks a day, but they are not all diesel.
Mr. King: Are the docks enclosed? Answer: The docks downtown are
not enclosed except in the warehause.
Mr. Silk: Do you have protection and dust facilities? Answer: We do.
Mr. Aspelin continued that the plant downtown is running two shifts,
and we expect to be down to one shift with the new plant. We have checked
the noise and we can go within the code easily. Wi.th the muffling we are
proposing, I do not think you are going to notice any more noise.
Mr. King: Once you get up in�o cheap rates over the rail, you would
probably be using the railroad track more. Answer: Most transportation
is by truck.
Mrs. Zdesley Ehlers, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, Mounds View: I am not
familiar with the zoning of Fridley and wonder if Chere is a buffer zone
on the border. Does the industrial line go right up to the City line?
Chairman Hughes explained that Fridley has different buffer zones for
each category. For example, there is not a separaCe zoning categoxy along
the edge of property. Rather we write into the zoning code for each
particular category the setbacks, screening requirements, etc. In the
case of heavy industrial zoning, 100 feet is the setback. In this case,
the boundaxy will be 50 feet plus the street,
Mr.�King: If they are going to plan on building a plant of this size,
I think it would behoove the City of Fridley to have railroad crossing
signals put in on Central Avenue.
Chairman Hughes stated they (Studebaker) would not cross Old Central
with the railroad traffic as they axe on the East side of Central Avenue.
Mr. Aspelin said they would probably have about 10 cars a month.
Mr. Griffith stated, if at all possible, we would appreciate it if
action could be taken on the matter some time this evening inasmuch as
we are operating under a short term option. We have to have an answer on
the proposal in order to make a determination on the option. This is only
an option situation and that the decision has not been finally made to
locate here. �
.
.,
Planning Commission Meeting - April 6, 1967 Page 4
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Myhra, that the public hearing of the
rezoning request (ZOA ��67-03), Boise Cascade Corporation, to rezone to
M-2 all that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12 not presently
zoned M-2 be closed. Upon a voice v�te, all voting aye, the motion carxied
unanimously.
Chaix'man Hughes stated that it appears from the way this land is pzesent�:-
zoned that what is being requested is essentially to correct the existing
zoning. We have a circumstance of commercial and residential in small
parcels surrounded on two sides by industrial property. It seems likely
that it we were zoning this territory for the first time that we would
make it a major industxial tract. The petition is completely justified
and should be considered in terms of a correction of what, at best, was
a mistake in the first place. The City Manager added that this was zoned
that way in 1955, probably for the matter of convenience only.
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Commission
recommend to the City Council that the rezonin� xequest (ZOA ��67-03) Boise
Cascade Corporation to rezone to M-2 all that part of fihe Southeast Quarter
of Section 12 not presently zoned M-2, be granted. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, the motion carried.
2. REOPEN LOT SPLIT ��65-14, H. M. NYGARD: Part of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision
��129 .
Member Xlinen reviewed the discussion and mc�ion of the Plats & Subdivi-
sions - Streets & Utilities Subco�mnittee meeting of March 30, 1967, the
minutes of which are in this agenda.
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission
Concur in the second portion of the Plats & Subdivisions - Streets & Utilitie�
Subcommittee motion in their minutes of March 30, 1967 and recomznend to the
City Council approval of the Lot Split ��65-14, H. M. Nygard, being that
�art of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision ��129 lying west of east 273.0 feet,
except west 17.0 feet taken for Centiral Avenue and except easement over.,
north 30 feet for road purposes for the modification of the request being
I75 feet for the loC facing Central Avenue and 75 feet for the ot to t e
east. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��67-01, MYLO PARKS: Parcels 2000, 2010 and 2020,
Auditor's Subdivision ��10 (Revised) - splitting for special assessments.
The City Manager explained the circumstances of receiving the request
at the last minute. The lots were split in Anoka because of taxes, but the
County will not split assessments. The former owners have sold portions
and have not gone through the formality of a lot split. One of the present.
owners wi11 have to pay the assessments on land which he does not own, in
addition to his property, if the lot split is not granted.
The Engineering Assistant was requested to make a drawing to be ready
for the Council meeting on Monday, April 10th, showing the lots to be,
from West to East, approximately 110 feet, 125 feet, 109 feet, and 90 feet
of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision ��10 (Revised).
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of Lot S lit ��67-01 a11 of Lot 1.0 Auditor's Subdivision
�10 (Revised) �•�ith frontages on Missi.ssippi Street .from West to East of
"' �. Planning Conunission Meeting - Apri1 6, 1967 Page 5
approximately 114 feet, 125 feet, 109 feet and 90 feet, subject to verifi-
cation and clarification by the Engineering Department. Upon a voice vote,
all voting ave, the motion carried unanimouslv.
It was noted there are two zoning categories in the above parcel, but
the Commission felt that no further action was required now, but there is
the possibility of a request later on to extend the commercial zoning.
4. APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS: S. CHMIELEWSKT: Lot 12, Block 2, Osborne
Manor, special use permit for two family dwelling.
Member Ylinen said he visited the property and talked to adjacent
property owners and only one indicated mild disapproval. He stated it was
a good lot. The petitioner lives in one of the adjacent homes. The
proposed structure would be two stories.
MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Jensen, to recommend approval of the
�etition of Severin or Eleanor Chmielewski, to the Citv Council for this
two family dwelling on Lot 12, Block 2, Osborne Manox with the specifica-
tion that there be a garage stall for each dwelling unit, connected to
the street with a hard surfaced driveway, and the remainder of �he lot
sha11 be sodded including the boulevard, and further stipulate that the
owner enter into an agreement with the City in connection with the above
requirements that if the owner does not comply with said requirements, the
City sha 1 comp ete said requirements and assess the cost back to the
property. pon a voice vote, a voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
5. THIRD STREET PATTERN:
Copies of the letter from Erickson Petroleum Corp. indicating their
desire not to participate in plans concerning carrying Third 3treet
through to 57th Avenue were passed out to the Comznission members.
In answer to Chairman Hughes question, Member Jensen (chairman of
the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subconunittee) said it is
pretty hard to suimnarize. It involves literally months of study by the
Subcommittee and resulted in a fairly complete division of opinion as to
the merits or demerits of the proposal. The Subcommittee made two motions,
the first motion failed which favored the recommendation of the proposal.
Since there seemed ta be no real feeling for continued review of the
problem, it seemed to be the wisest move to forward it to the Planning
Commission. This letter from Erickson Petroleum Corp. is a complete
surprise in view of the Subcommittee meeting which took place on March 30th.
In a very shaxt time they have more or less reversed their feeling. Mr.
. Wagnex called me after a discussion with Bob Rote so that I would be aware
of the reversal and I called Bob Rote, because the comments made t4 me
really did not say anything except they were no Ionger favoring this pro-
posal, Bob Rote informed me they own additional pzoperty north of 57th
Avenue across the street of their present site and it is.the feeling now
of Bob Rote and the management that the street which they have in the past
proposed could actually become a deterrent in the development of this
property. They could be in the position of having fostered a road which,
in a year or two, they might wish not to be there at a11, They have not
developed specific plans at this writing, but did not wish to delay any
action if the Committee wished to continue the study.
Chairman Hughes said that sometime ago a number of the members touxed
�._.....�.,._..,,� ��.,�,�-.,w,.5.,:.� �.��-.��,d..�.�,..,�.�,�-�-,�,,,a„�,,,,..�- -
� �' R..i"`C' i-�:� --°: �
-- t�'�
.,` � ....._..�._. - Z
c� .—
U (3
+C___.__ `�
_____,_� �--�
!l
_ -� l
< ,�
�
�
—__
4/7167
i
i
0
. . �\ +t �, 1 4 .,.� 0
� V' �.. ( �I '...l� F.=.a, .
� 6'
�
N
N.
� �� ;
_ � ,
c'� r
��
.' '
�
'"�
�
1�
��
�.
�
ti
' �r ..
..
..
COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC.
Consul�ing E�gineers
1446 Covnty �Zoad "J"
Minn�apolis, i�linnesota 55432
April 10, 19b?
Honorable Mayor & City Counci�.
c/o Mr. �arl P. Wagner, City Managea
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed Che bids received at 12:00 Noon this date for Water
Tmprovement Project No. 83, restora�ion of the 1.5 MG reservoir.
A bid eabulation �s attached hereto for your inf�rniation. The low bid
was by Rys�aard-Master Company, Ince, 1253 West Connelly Avenue St. Paul,
Minnesota for the lump sum of $7,28Q.00 with a dedaction allowed of $80.00
if the painting can be completed i�mediately �rather than delay the final
coat un�il the �ence 3s in place.
Our esti�sated construction cost was �8y800.00 wi�h an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $10,560.00. Since the bids �eceived were within the
estimate we recomtnend ghat the pro��c� be �waxd�d to Aysgaard-Master Company,
Inc. At the tian� a£ awa�d a detegm:�nation shou�.d be made � to whether or
not to raquire tha delay on the fin�rl �oat. It wo�ald appear that the $80.00
would be well spent in waiting for �he fen�e co�istruction fox the final
exter3or coat to avoid vandalism.
DCd/mg
Very truly youss,
COMSTOCF: & �AVIS, IidC.
Bq
E, . Co�stock, P. 33.
.�
�
� ;. _
M� �1€C+�if ���3
M, �e, Pics�t�*�eon & Sa , in�c.
$�.€� ��ygx�: �iv�n�ae
St� ��ue'_, Mi�an� �5201
A�1�L�ei ��nt�etf��� Co� ia���p �n�o
�,�'(�7 .��f�ias�� Sta, �T.�A
it�.�������i�s M�.��o S� 13
Ryg����.1�-�i�.�st�r �a�. , �c � �
�.253 �d��� �+�n��11q � o
Sto ���!.:� , ��a�o 55112
t��.1�.�_ ��:�'�taii��i �l�o.;`�c� ia0� °3
F?t::�?I.E?'y M�N:d�;i�T�
��'�x�3 O�Li�i��G Ot+d rl�Ii�L 1�, 19�i7 �.T 12:OCi I�CK3N
�t�D S�lR�TX
A,�. Zn�uran��
S% Bid B�c�c�
�tartford Ins.
5% Bid Bond
Cont. Ins. Co.
5%
�UUMP ���I BI�� 1��t1CT
$�.1,QOQ.qO y �10Q.00
$ 9,260,0C� �$100.00
$ 7,280.00 ;$ 80.00