Loading...
02/24/1969 - 5527� � ' � � � ' ' ■J ' ' ' , ' ' , � ' ' COUNCIL SECRETARY-JUEL MER�R COUNCIL MCETING AGENDA 5:15 P.M.- FEBRUARY 24, 1969 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - FEBRUARY 24, 1969 - 5:15 P.M PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS: 1. Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.07 of the City Charter to Vacate Streets and Alleys and to Amend Appendix C of the City Code (2G Foot Service Drive Easement, Bob Schroer) 2. Receiving the Planning Commission Minutes of February 13, 1969. NEW BUSINESS: 3. APProval of letter to be sent to Northern Pacific Railroad CoTment; The NP has requested permission of the City to negotiate with Mpls. for a do�nestic water connec- tion on 43rd Avenue. This letter is for your approval) 4. Receiving Bids and Awarding ConCract -Storm Sewer Project ��89 (Bids Opened February 24, 19b9, 12;00 Noon) 5. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Improvements and Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids, Water Project 4�92 6. Consideration of Resolution on Proposed New Metropolitan Tax Progiam ADJOURN: Page 1 Page 2 - 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 , � ORDINANCE N0. � � AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO Ah1END APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE. � � ' , � ' � � 1 ' r The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: S$CTION 1. For the vacation of the 24 foot service drive easement described as follows: All that part of the westerly twenty- four (24) feet of the easterly fifty (50) feet (except the south ten (10) feet) of Block 22, Fridley Park Addi- tion, all located.in Section 15, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, Courity of Anoka, State o£ Minnesota. All lying in the north half (N1/2) of Section 15, T-30, R-24, Ci:ty of Fridley, County of Anoka, State o£ Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated, ` SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in con- formance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter-and Appendix C of City Code Shall be so amended. 1 PASSED B�THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, THIS �� ��, '�- DAY OF OCT6BER /fb % � �.,.. XOR - Jac 0. Kir am __ ___ __ ATTEST: _ _ _ CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell Public Hearing: October 7, 1968 First Reading: October 21 1968 Second Reading:� � ���� Publish ..... . ���u��� � � �� ���� /�2�����"' / � � l°'�` ' � ' ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 1969 � PAGE 1 The meeting was called to order by Ghairman Erickson at 7:35 P.M. ROLL Ct�LL • Members Present: Myhra, Mittelstadt, Erickson, Sensen, Fitzpatrick Members Absent: None Others Present: City Manager Homer R. Ankrum, Engineering Assistant ' Darrel Clark APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 30, 1969: MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, thaC the Planning Commission minutes of January 30, 1969 be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 27 1969: MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Co�nission receive the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of January 27, 1969: Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission receive the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee minutes of February 6, 1969. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unani.mously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES• FEBRUARY 11 1969: MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission receive the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee minuCes of February 11, 1969. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA ��b9-02, GEORGE M. NELSON: North Half of Lot 30, North Half Lot 31, AudiCOr's.Subdivision No. 129 -- rezone from R-1 to R-3A. � Mr. Nelson said he represented Burton Johnson, John Flanery and Roger Johnson, He said that the south half of Lots 30 and 31 on 73rd Avenue are zoned multiple dwelling and are across from the Onan plant. The frontage of the north half of Lots 30 and 31 is about 490 feet on Onondaga Street, and at the present time} the land is undeveloped, The improvements are in the street both on Onondaga and 73rd, They would like to plan an apartment development on the total site and were requesting rezoning facing Onondaga Street the same as the south half of Lots 30 and 31. The public hearing notice was read by Chairman Erickson. ' � � , � � � , � G i , � � i._ . � . PlanninQ Con¢nissian MeetinQ - Februarv 13 1469 PaQe 2 Robert Locker, 1b01 Onondaga Street; He presented a petition against the rezoning. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission receive the petition presented by Mx. Locker and circulated by him dated February 13, 19b9 opposing the rezoning-request, ZOA f�69-02. ,Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried-unanimously. - George Aanson, 1476 Onondaga St.: Ae said the petition just presented represents pretty near everybody on that block. It includes nineteen home owners. They feel there is plenty of comnnercial and industrial Chat is aoned commercial along there without putting it out in a residential area. These people are-buying theix homes without knowing the rezoning that is coming about.. Gordon P, Gnasdoskey, 1491 Onondaga St.: He said he lived on the East end of the park and felt that the park should remain the way it is now. There is a lot of children using it, and at the present time there is a lot of traffic all the time to that area. He thought putting such a.complex in a residential area would be hazardous, as far as traffic is concerned. Ae was against the rezoning. The Engineering Assistant distributed maps of the area to the Coimnis- sion. The street shown through the center of Lots 4, 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision �108 was half way through the area, and he reminded the Comnis- sion that Lot 5 was just reviewed, When asked if he could foresee any problems, the Engineering Assistant said that this pattern would be necessary to develop the area into single family dwellings, but if the development would be in large pieces, perhaps there would not be any need for a street down the middle. Delphine Hentges, 1533 Onondaga St.: She asked how can they rezone when everyone is against it. We would not have bought our places if we thought that they would rezone. We are all against it and just the petitioner is for rezoning. If iC goes through, then what? Chairman Erickson said that anyone has the right to ask for whatever they want to do. The Council is the ultimate authority on it. The Council would have to say whether or not it would be rezoned. AfCer the hearing before this body, there will be another hearing before the City Council at which time the public is re-notified. Thomas E. Marxen, 773 83rd Avenue N.E.t He asked if the cul de sac on Lots 5 and 6 would still go through and was informed the land has been dedicated and the street would. Then he asked what kind of sCreet Onondaga would be. Chairman Erickson said he assumed he was referring to the differ- ence between residential and industrial. Streets that have multiple dwellings do not have to have a heavier design. Mr. Robert Locker: I heard it mentioned that if it zemains residential, a street would have to be put through there. Why would it have to go through there? Darrel Claxk answered that gerhaps some day they may want to divide their property into smaller lots. The plans we are looking at would provide access. All this plan does is to tell us whexe the street could go i£ they desire to put it in. i � 1 � , � i � � Plannina, Cotmnission MeetinQ - Februar� 13 1969 PaQe 3 Mrs. John R. Doyle, 1651 Onondaga St.: What kind of buildings did they plan to put on this land? Mr. Nelson answered that they did not have any specific kind in mind yet. MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission close the public hearing of ZOA �69-02, George M. Nelson, of the N'� of Lot 30 and the N'� of Lot 31, Auditor's Subdivision d6129, to be rezoned Pxom R-1 to R-3A. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the sequest for rezoning, ZOA �69-02, George M. Nelson, of the N'� of Lot 30 and N'� of Lot 31, Auditor's Subdivision ��129 from R-1 to R-3A be denied. Bill Einnerty, SQ40 Oakland Ave., Mpls.: What sight does the property owner have in the event it is not usable for residential and could not be rezoned? The Chairman answered he did not think, for one thing, the particular cost for residential is prohihitive. He thought if the petitioner had some facts that it would be a hardship, they could bring it to the Council. Mx. Finnerty then asked that, as far as the rezoning, fiow far can the objections come from. He was told that anyone had the right to voice their opinion and that the City notifies owners within 300 feet. Mr. Mittelstadt said the reasons for his motion of denial were that there were 19 names on the petition against rezoning and these people do not want to see apaxtment complexes. He found no hardship in this case. He would agree to the rezoning, but felt that in this area, which is right next to major industrial complex, it should remain as is. He £elt the proposed streets should be put in within tha next few years. The access is needed and should be put in. Mr. Myhra said he thought where there is an industrial area, apartments probab.ly would serve a buffer purpose. We have that on 73rd Avenue now, and if we were to rezone the northern part of the lots, we are actually getting out of that category and are getting into something like spot zoning. The Chairman added that the use of the area is substantially single family residences. He could not see, at this point, the need to rezone inasmuch as-the Planning Co�nission recently approved a lot split for single family residence. He felt it should remain on R-1. Mx. Fitzpatrick commented on the £act that many people at the meeting tonight are from McKiniey and Lakeside which is £urther away. He wondered if there was a reason for those living closer not being present. Several members of Che audience volunteered the information that there were valid reasons for four of the neighbors not being present. Mr. Locker said that he was new in the area in the past two months. His 1 home was on Onondaga and I,akeside. He did not know anyone other than those right near him. He moved from St. Paul because of apartments and the traffic they generate. ' , � � � � ' � � � ' Planning Cotmnission MeetinR - February 13 1969 page 4 2. � 3. � � � Chairman Ezickson asked for the vote on the MOTION, reco:mnending denial of the rezoning request. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, THE MOTION CARRIED UNANEMOUSLY. The audience were informed that this recommendation would go to the City Council on Monday. The Council will or will not set a public hearing date. The petitioner may desire Co continue it and he has that privilege. He may decide to withdraw. West 47 feet of the South 120 feet of Lot 10, Auditor`s Rezone fxom R-1 to R-3A. Chaircnan Erickson read the public hearing notice. H: The ion 9k88. Mr. Momchilovich brought a plan of the area for the Planning Commission to atudy. Eugene Lang, 1132 Mississippi St.; His home is on the South side of Mississippi Street and he has lived there 20 years. He asked if Che property North of Mississippi is zoned R-1, single family and wondered if commercial would be requested. The Chairman said there has been no request for anything other than what is requested now. Mr. Momchilovich discussed his plans with Mr. Lang. MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Co�ission close the public hearing, ZOA �i68-11, Louis Momchilovich, of the West 47 feet of the South 120 feet of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision fi88 to be rezoned from R-1 to R-3A. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unan imous ly . MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning request, Z0A 9�68-11, Louis Momchilovich, of the West 47 feet of the South 120 feet of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision #88, to rezone fzom R-1 to R-3A as it being the logical expansion of the R-3A zoning previously granted to Mr. Momchilovich allowing him to make better use of his property, and subject to the signature of the fee owner. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. The Chaisman stated that the Planning Co�uission should have the signa- ture of the fee owner since Mr. Momchilw ich does not have the title to this property. rUSLlc H�aKING: YROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. �69-01 SRENTWOOD ES THOMAS R. SWANSON: Rear 431.6 feeC of Lot 35, rear 401.9 feet of Lot Revised Auditor's Subdivision #77. Chairman Erickson xead the public heaYing notice. J 6 Plannix�¢ CouQnission MeetinQ - Februarv 13 1969 Pa�e 5 Mr. Swanson was present and stated he would be glad Co answer any ques- tions. He distributed maps to the Commission. The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee at their meeting of February 6, 1969 recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat with the stipulation that a 20 foot utility easement be provided from the proposed cul de sac East to East River Road. Mr'. Swanson volunteered he was not able to contact both parties for th� easements as yet. Benedict Novak, 115 71st Way N.E.: He said he owned Lot 34 which was south and west of the proposed preliminary plat. He has access to his property over a small road maintained by the school £or deliveries to their building. He was worried about the assessments because of the south aud east frontage. Daxrel Clark said the school had sewer and water along the south line � for the school which is not used by the residents in that area. if they used the lines, Chey would be assessed. He had talked with Jim Hedren who stated this idea was brought before them in 1951 of dedicating more 1 right of way. The school board now would like to see a topog map before final apgroval, Chairman Erickson asked the Novak's if they plan to divide their lot and would the proposed preliminary plat fit in with their iutuze plans. Mr. Novak said he did not know how much would be taken off for a road. If the proposal was for 25 feet, the south side of his lot is the Eront yard and would noC leave him enough 1and. Mrs. Novak said they come in off East River Road on what used to be 71st, but now it is not exactly a street but an easement. Mr. Jensen said the school board plows this easement to get supplies into the school. Mr. Nocak asked if he could have the cost of street, cuxb, sewer and water. Darrel Clark told him if his property were divided into two lots facing 72nd and the present house facing the proposed north-south street, sewer and water would be assessed on frontage only. The street would be assessed along the frontage and ane third on the side yard. His lot may be large enough to divide into three parcels. Mr. Novak said the street is 100 feet from the house and if you took anything more off for the street, there would not be enough left. Mr. Jensen told him that, depending what the action of the school board is, it might not be necessary to ask for any additional right of way on the south side of his lot. There was a short discussion regarding the present cost of assessments. The people living north of the proposed plat said they bought their property hecause they did not want to live in somebody's backyard. They couldn't afford more taxes either. The wells and cesspools have given them no trouble. � ' _� .. ' 1 � � Planning Commission Meeting - February 13, 1969 Page 6 4. MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commisszon table the discussion on this public hearing, P.S. �69-01, until the school board makes appearance this evening. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ion ZOA �68-13, HArS1ERLUND ENTERPRISESy INC., . North 903 feet of East 3/4 of NE� of NE'� 200), Rezone from R-1 to R-3A, Mr.'Myhra said one of the questions to be answered was that of utilities. Darrel Clark said he did check the capacity of both sewer and c.�ater and there would be no problem serving a complex of this multitude. Mr. Myhra added that there was some question about part of this land being deeded to the City for park, and asked if the Planning Comnission should be taking any kind of official action on this until they had some feeling from the City in this regard as the petitioner is willing to deed it. The Chairman of the Parks & Recreation, Mr. Fitzpatrick, stated there are areas West that are under consideration for parks and some have already been purchased such as the Eontaine and Ing Siverts parcels. Mx. Jensen said it is i,mportant from the standpoint of Rice Creek that the creek bottom be maintained in its present form. It should not be filled and no structure should be allowed to be built on that creek bottom where it would impede the flow of water. This channel is xequired to carry the water. It is really a trench because it has been eroded from time to time. There followed a discussion of the elevations of the creek. Clark said that looking at the topog, Central-Avenue is 863 feet above sea level. The Co�ission discussed allowing the rezoning of the land North of the creek and keeping Che creek bottom and bluffs in their existing condition. AY this point, Mr. Nordstrom was asked to bring up his plans for dis- cussion and study. The Commission took an informal poll of the members to detexmine what the feeling was as to the rezoning itself being proper. Mr. Myhra said he was not really pleased with the layout of the suggested apartment complex. He added it does seem we have an axea about as ideal for multiples as we are going to find what with Onan's on the north. Chairman Erickson agreed. Mr. Jensen wondered about the-road along-the New Sr3ghton side. Darrel Clark said a road would not serve any more lots, but would carry tsaffic from one side of the creek to another. He had not heard o£ any plans to extend Stinson Boulevard. A discussion of the watershed area of Rice Creek was asked by Mr. Jensen. A dam could be put in to hold the water up and a pond near Central Avenue. The report of the flood plain information survey, which wi11 be done by the Corps of Engineexs, will be ready by the first of July.. Mr.-. Ankrum said that last yeax we were not included, but now we should be the first one this year. ' , ' ' � PlanninQ Co�ission MeetinQ - Februarv 13, 1469 Pa�e 7 Continuing, Mr. Jensen said he thought it is important for the City to acquire creek bottoms when available and without being concerned hy usefulness as developed park. In the opinion of the Chairman, the City should acquire bottom land, but not necessarily for park purposes. - In answer to the question of the construction schedule, Mr. Nordstrom said he had been to City Ha11 a number of times and is ready to go ahead -- financial coamiittments have been made. Chai�an Esickson said that in oxdes to get something moving, he would suggest that the property south of the 860 contour line be deeded to the City and that no construction of residential buildings be allowed below the 880 line. The City would be provided with access easements needed from the property, One of the objections by Mr. Myhra was the use of automobile parking , ail the way around the complex for a buffer. Mr. Nordstrom said he would work on that. � , ' �_ � � ' ' � 'r i ' It was felt that a slope easement should be requested so that the 20 foot vertical hank of the cYeek would not be distur6ed and that the area north of the 860 be the zoning boundary. This would amount to about 10% of the whole area. Darrel Clark wondered if this could be handled by agreement rathex than easement, � MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Co�nission reco�end approval of the rezoning request, ZOA �68-13, Haffinerlund Enter- prises, Inc., Clarence Nordstrom, Applicant, of the North 903 feet of the East 3/4 of the NE� of the NE'� of Section 13 (Parcel 10 and 200) to rezone from R-1 to R-3A subject to the following conditions: That the petitioner agrees to sell to the City of Fridley the remainder of the total parcel South of the North 813 feet for the sum of one dollar and other considerations as previously offered and that an easement be provided over the South 160 feet of the North 813 feet for purposes of maintaining slope and that a suitable access easement be provided to the previously mentioned parcel which the City is to acquire, location to be negotiated between the ownex and the City. The Planning Co�nission does not feel that the plan as presented is necessarily a part of this action. It was noted that the petitioner should be granted enough land to accommodate 312 apartment units at 2,500 gquare feet per unit. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. (3. Public HearinQ: Pronosed Preliminarv Plat P.S. ��b9-01, Brentwood Estates) Chairman Erickson co�ented that rfr. Jim Thayer and Mr. Gordon Sangster, members of the school board were now present. MOTION by Mittlestadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission remove from table the proposed preliminary plat, P.S. �k69-02. Mr. �hayer said it was very difficuLt for him and Mr. Sangster to makz a decision regarding the giving of an easement for road purposes. The school site of Riverwood School is rather small and the property has to be utilized to Che fullest. Any amount they would dedicate to the City would reduce the playground area. They would have to know what the specific request ' � � L Planning qommission Meeting - Februarv 13, 1469 PaRe 8 is, what the amount of the assessments would be, and on the basis of that, if it is what we want to do in that area. If you were talking of aligning it with a portion o£ 72nd Avenue, it will be an additional 22 feet, the Engineering Assistant said. In answer to the question o£ the size of the cul de-sac, he said that it has a 50 fooC xadius. There could be flexibility where turn around would be located to allow maximum use £or school purposes. , Mr. Thayer said the easement to the north of the school was used far delivery trucks. If the deliveries came to the front doox, they would have to be carted to the back. ' � The Chairman sai:d he did not see how the Planning Coffinission could allow a plat of this type to go in if there were no way to get to it. The mpnbers o£ the school board requested a topog map for their study. They requested the matter be held up until March llth, the next meeting of the school board when Mr. Hansen will be back in town. They asked that the Engineering Department make an approximation as to how the property will be assessed. � It was explained by parrel Clark that there would be more work involved in dete�taining assessments than the topog map. It would be very difficult to make an assessment figure. There was a discussion elaborating on this problem. Mr. Jensen believed that Councfl should require that the School 6e treated as they would any other property owner. The School has already put in water and sewer services. MOTION by ,7ensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing, P.S. ��69-01, Brentwood Estates, Thomas R. Swanson of the rear 431,6 feet of Lot 35 and rear 401.9 feet of Lot 33, Revised Auditor's Subdivision �k77, to the meeting of March 13, 1969. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 5. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA �69-03, COMMITTEE OF FIVE N. CRAIG JOHNSON: South of 74th Way between East River Road and railroad tracks. Confirm public hearing date ot February 27, 1969. MOTION by MitCelstadt, seconded by Myhra, Chat the Planning Coffinission confirm the public hearing date of Eebruary 27, 1969 for the rezoning request, ZOA �69-03, CommitCee of Five, N. Craig Johnson, to rezone from C-2S and M-1 to R-3, the area south of 74th Way between East River Road and the railroad tracks. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 6. STREET STUDY.: PROPOSED STREET PATTERN NORTH OF ASBORNE ROAD The Co�nission were given eight maps to study for a street pattern. The � , , PlanninQ Commission Meeting - Fe6ruarv 13, 1969 PaQe 9 Engineering Assistant said that Pattem �8 proposed Main Street be extended southerly across the open land and connect up with Commerce Lane and that the service drive constructed along University Avenue be looped back away from the highway at Osborne Road and 79th Avenue. I�TION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission , recommend to Council the alignment of Main Street from 79th Avenue south to 77th Avenue, thence defect to the East and connect to Osborne Road opposite Crnmnerce Lane, and that a service drive be prwided along the West side of , University Avenue with loopbacks at Osborne Road and 79th Avenue. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ' 7. ' ' 8. ' ' , � , . , , , ` ' ' ' � MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Co�ission receive the letter from Mr. Rodney Billman dated February 7, 1969. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNN�;NT: MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission meeting of February 13, 1469 be adjourned at 1Q:35 P.M. Upon a voice vate, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted ��/�ef �`;��2�nv_ Haz 1 0'Brian Recording Secretary 1U 560•3450 �it� � f �ridje� ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 February 25, 1969 Northern Pacific Railroad General Office 176 East 5th St. St. Paul, Minn, ATTENTION: J.P. Titus Dear Mr. Titus: At.a special meeting held on February 24, 1969 the City Council passed a motion authorizin; the Northern,Pacific Railroad to negotiate with the City of Minneapolis for a domestic water connection to the trailer house located on 43rd Avenue West of the Minnesota Linseed Plant. DC/nj f Yours very truly, � �-+� DARREL CLAR Acting City Engineer 0 11 Qti`,t'' � ' v" �' �p J �/ saoa�a s�{r;�.�. Zt�ROY,°.i+�:IIT P80.IECT i�FO< 9��� -�� FRIDa°,EY� MINNL''SOiA � ' BiA OPSN�tFU ST I2:OOINCOid T�EBSJtIi'Y 2�5, 1�J6 �� ) I�j ../��.�. ._._,_...__ .� �._._._..� _ _� . Pj9P�FiDI.DiTt 1,� $E;.3''D�YASSA � .c.OTi3� xIlL'. � ?�txt� 3 ' ��s�o, Minn:�ata 55�5Q r,z,^n7Fgi � S�»s, sne. C%�'/':'bD N73'C.h Ciet/s'��$ 1.1e. t•v� ;. Paula PY:i.;s:�eB�Ca� S5�?3 ».-s.i13iFL� l�uc^vL?.*:��i2�3s ZTlC. —_ �-9.;?c�+�n3zi.�, ���a�aso�:a 5G30& P+�t,zvin Fe,abe�n i.ssseds��;�3.ng, Sn:.. �nK� axa �'cresg La(ce, %31n�eso[a 5�Oy5 � � i?�bP�.-e r+_t�1_ a co�rc�d�z�sn �'�90 – lOt?: �•_ax�;E� 2?�w Fa��, AI£zne�a�� 55055 ���r1x;� Coret;,ua�:Loa Co�p:�g — 49 Si�n.I liflles 'w`azeY St, Pau?, �t?n�esoca 55i:�s �.^�e so wtcra�ssz, Inc. ^ �e� 3"s5 �i�:s�a, %iir���ota 55359 �T�o��het� Cc�u�rac>ir,u v�; .a�aq B��z 335 T?cp'c'n�9 2f.in_a�U�:� 553G;�. q�.�.n,�t;aa � :�cin��r� i3c. 1 i=:00 8ig�:wsj as tB.E. gi�n- aaao2Za, 2�i:x�a��ot4 55432 3ZD SU2iTY 5!" J zu-� Frn:� �' /�ss,we � Gri - �a I�r-n' � �� � � = nc�, S�C L� � ' l 4e i a`-I�ca��4 Cii � �� � � �� /;`�.�' 9z.� G a-.-L-.� � � �lL B"'�Q SY � ,�r�z � -t N-z-s.�.;. < �+<-s: � S�� F���.� U � fi�+ 6�,u. s`�, i�-�P . J� A-�-, �-5 - � S� (��,�Q � kz�. �� � � s�l� �n,c � T.,T�S>.+i? :iiitl �3";3 J C3:�L• ::.I:t)P? T� i�T' � /ZJ �Z�'o-ri � . �' i9, � zi .c-v �' J�� v�7-� � I�,ros.� �� � l4� So (c o-�` �' 1! � l/o -� �f �� / L %S � :� �� � yo .� l < � s��.��� � � � GS L h �-�Y $ . �-v c � � � A-y 5 �fJS�Gi �� CEO-�' p,..��� �S ��' ��-vS . �s S/�-� �.-� � cwcsTOC,� a nevis. ixc. conenitsng Bngin�ere 1466 Couaq Yo�d "3" Himaapolie� ltiom�sota 35L$2 Fabswrp 24, 1969 8000rabL Na�os 6 Cit� Co�meil C/o Ms. llo�= Anktw, Cit7 M�nassr Cit� oi lridlh 6431 Dsi�ns�lq Awnw� H.B. Mim�apolis, Minnaota 55421 R�s 8ws� Swar Itiprova�nt Proj�et No. 89 G�atluras O� haw sa�rlawd t6a bida rscaived at 12a00 neos on T�bruary 24e6� 1969, !er Sto=a 8wwr I�pro�nMnt Projaet 89. A labulatian of eh� btds r�- ceiwd !� attaeh�d h�to tos roar lotor�stion. Y'ha lar bid ws subd.tted by po3srt L. l�till�r Consenctioo, 1390 lOth Awmu, ilMrport, Mimesou 55055, in tbs arount oi $11,105.00. Tha wtiaapd eoe�emctiou cwt of th� i�provwns ws $16,900.00. W�co�d tbat tha contrut bs awsd�d to Sob�r! L. !lill�r Constrnction iu tLs a�o�mt of hi� bid. BVC/!�P oa7 ttu11 7outis Calf81+OQ S D�AVIB, IAC. B� � S. . , P.S. ,.�� , . . . �; . ,�_:r �. .`.:jY�.. . , .. .. ,.>. ':+.�09'7,":� . .::;:Ys3u €�TXOi� . � .. r,?� �"_at}�4'� .a.�p....;qC�'i?"c' .... . p'�yp:". i't?f-�... .:.�.'s'. 1 e�Yl'd ��Td�� .. f/.S �. 113y� .. 4^ .- .. In,$9':`.i.�.�_ .. 'td"s ,.. ....:i:.f �^ i�'. .i.��a...�`•.*.CU ii:i.E'. :� ,� ;�9r.!...: xF.<��. p��.k'n,h8tr.',':;. ?� !-:.� r.:fi;,.E.,' .�, Yta RCd',�:�. �'.,J . � . ... F?,. ... . :"�u`�:F* . t.. ,. �!' eAk�iP ')��^ ��l ^'C?i:a FeP.,�: _. J` .` .'r� .. ., , . '�AI. .3'+"�� . -.. s �..,� .� �.i--1'%f';:Y . 3�+ ..:i:5 . . ., '°'�ai< .m. . . ,�. _. , .r^. . . ' ' . ._. � . Wi3U..g.°^a!J'328 .,i.e,. . ... "... .. s,�'° . . .... . . ._ . _. ���2' -Si`J.e.�>ail�' ''.ce 3., =;�t�t . _. .3.�. , �..� , '�1�.�-z�, .,_:- 1i1 -_^n3.x�1�� -zs. ? r . . - .. � . , .. s- '-. , nc'- t�..•. ti�:< ..., ., .. :r..`.`'i ��I :r:t$i'r'J.�� :i� �.�:. . . , . . . � , "`,'x y},...s'�tc x`..- .. � .� �, .'s� t.t sx., �,,. _ . ... ...:.: ..��. . . .+.. _..S �: , - �. _ . v»6 � ..��"� ��� ,y� 4 1 � -��; ,�.�� �,� #,.��� �_ _ . ��. -� r�:�z,v�- � � t� 'r� �, STORM S�fBR IHI�ROVEtffi�iT PROJECT M0. 89 FRIDLSY. llIbiNffiOTA BID OP'BNING AT 1Z:0a D100N P&BRDASY 24. 1969 PLANSOLDIIR Barbaroesa 6 Sons. Inc. Routa 3 Osaeo, MianesoCa 55369 ..�.r__� .. o, _.... 2560 Nprth Cieveland Avenua 3t. Pau1, Hinnesoea 55113 8ID SURATSC � LUt� SUH BID St. Panl lite � Matine $12,920.00 Sx Nodland Associaies. Iae. � Aoeric�m Ins. AleYandria. liimnesota 56308 �� Mnrvia 8e6bein Landecsping, Inc. Bmc;. 222 For�et Lake, Mianeaota 55025 Robest M111er Conetructioa 1390 - lOth Avenue Nev Poit, Mianewota 55055 Hunley Construction_Coapany 49 �iga�l Hills biaet St. 'Pau]., Dtl.nneaota 55118 C, fi: 3[cCroeaan, Inc. Boz 3&'i Ossao,: ?7imasota 55369 Nortiielen Coatractiag Caup�y Bor-�3b Ho�k'tus, Mianeeota 55344 SandatiYam 6.Na£aer, Inc. 7400 Itighway 65 N.B. Miwn�s�olis. Minneaota 55632 80 BID S19,o2S.00 19.d.lit� Deposit� Co. lfsryland sx I $16,267.00 Seaboard Surety ��Pffi7 5x St. Pwi Msa i 1larine 5Z Unitad.Statoe Pidelity i 6wr. SX Traos Aaeriean Ineusaaca Co. 5t 'Aw Haae Iadem. ��7 sz $11.105.00 ;14,506.00 $11s620.00 $14,27S.OQ Su,92o.00 (�I.STIOti TIl�IIB As Specifisd 50 Ca1. Daps ao c�. n�s Blank Apsil 15; 1969 �.00 Cal.. D�gq 43 Cal. Dis�s'' As Sp�ciffed. STO?�:�T S.cSd:'sTc I..'?Ffl't�E;•::IIT PROJECT I70. E9 FT.IBLES', Y.IP7t7FSOTA ISTD OzE:3�^�t°> fsR �2:G0 TIC4:t F?�P'J.1RY 2�, 2469 YLt�idHQLDi�; ��Yh��e��s c Sonu, Tnc. otcaa�e 3 Gc.seof, F'3n���mCa SS.if9 �S;;:l�.�`,t�. E- Sm�-tsp �L'C. —�A 25b4 No��la C��v���nd G�eaes� $Pe :�&t;,.s P'z'i1":7.�3Cii:8 .�?�a.�.� ._c_.�iC'�td.i322� �?:;L;"s::i8.s^8y 1^C. � __ �_€.�xan�s:ia; %itnrensota SG3C15 I<�AS:�'va,n F,ehb��.,z I,�r+S:iCII^t���.',niy. IR^. i.`.cs;�. �: �$22 . :ur.as� Lal,.e, :itnn�so:� 5��?5 Rs•L�sxt rLtll�a Cor.��r.,wtian 1?S0 — 2G'�h P;Ie, 'ze fi�w Por;., rSinnea�sa 553r5 iv.�lby CnnfiL��aed�?.on Ca�o�.r; �1 S�gaae. H-:z3a *yx,�8Y: SCe P8L^.?.e :Yi12u�:3C7i.� $J"L�ra �^�� s. .icci4� =8�, zn" - - 3cr:, 33+i UF$�D� 1'3.?.Z?II�.:.^.=�i a SrJaU� Nor�LheiJn C�as'a;;xao:`-_�.r.0 Ccr•�; t;.�g 3cx 33$ H•�p'c3ns, rSs_:,�sa�.4 s53�d, �3en�.at;:o�, � ;- _faex, I::r, � �v��. �i�o�3'��p 'JJr TI..r*.s � �'1�.R' 33�)C3� �.c y i':L_:ii£v'04E. �a.?�-'.1�� .X.TiIlU �� �S'+z'D utii E1i� 5 i� PFu� r�rQ��a mars�,u��� �vs. C'a S% /V U LT��•i' Ciii:t I'��'1 � IZ,qzo.00 � � � pmrt0.pc�}+J f � -`^'sj° � 19t. ozs, o0 � F�D2��Uy . �(ba� � �o S�M `1i'in� �•acf� C� S� �T Pac�� F.�i. �t �MYY'21 /J %� S% U; S F �o�c�r a �(l!9 arYi.T2��/ d/p `CiZ a �5 fltl1� x¢i ca- ��s. eo �g 16, 2L�. ov �11, 105 06 � i9 �'g'OCro. CD(� �%�a 6 (Q.�C� �4, a n S.00 �Qe�� C���RK' --� �0'rY'''. Lu':'7.�.i T:u:; : As SPr�,��.�� 5o e��, aAys �Cj C'A�. �aYs � c r+ti �G. �/-/s-�5 r�V C'A� 17AS5 4s �a � '�+vs Ho.v..c J`.A+a.t„i.',.�, . s � . C�e?. 1i ' � � Y�ti.9ao,00 ; AS �rc�r-��� � ' C� , � . 1 ' ' , , ' ' � ' � RESOLUTION N0. Y �/� � � AESOLUTION ORDERING IMEItOVEMENTS, APPROVAL dF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BTDS: WATER PROJECT N0. 92 WHEREAS, pursuant to a Resolution �12-1969 of the City Council adopted on January 20, 1969, Comstock and Davis, Incorporated, Consulting Engineers, has prepared plans and specifications for some of the improvements proposed by Resolution 4k198-1468 and has presented such plans and specifications Co the Council for apprwal: NOW, Tf�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the following improvements hexetofore pzoposed by the Council Resolution ��198-1968 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible to-wit: Water lateral, water and sewer services and appurtenances serving properties located on 66th Avenue: From University Avenue East to the cul de sac. That the work involved in such improvement as listed above shall hereafter be designated as WATER PROJECT N0. 92. 2. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 3, The work to be per£ormed under WATER PR03ECT N0. 92 shall be performed under one contract. The City Manager shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in Che official newspaper advertisements for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for one week (at least 10 days), and shall specify the work to be done and will state that bids will be opened and considered at 12:00 o'clock (noon), on the 17th day of March, 1969 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk, and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five per cent (5%) of the amount of such a bid. That the advertisement for bids for WATER PROJECT N0. 92 shall be substantially in form as that noted in F.�chibit "B" attached hereto for reference and made a part hereof. ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY THIS�DAY OF ./J,� , 1969. ATTEST: ' CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell PUBLISH: March 5, 1969 MAYOit - Jack 0. Kirkham �} r� 1 �G. � � l�.' ' , 1 � � �y� I RESOLUTION N0. 3� RESOLUTION ON PROPOSED NEW METROPOLITAN TAX PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Section of the League of Minnesota Municipalities has proposed legislation for a new metropolitan tax program. WHEREAS, such tax program would effect a change in tax which would purportedly reduce existing fiscal disparities between local taxing units in the metropolitan area to finance varying needs for educational and other local services. WHEREAS, the new tax structure would add additional income tax, sales tax, or property tax, etc., withi� the seven county metropolitan area. �, _ _ 1R� WHEREAS, the State and Federal Government already have programs designed to assist local governments and schools and such programs are basically designed on a need basis. WHEREAS, the spreading of the tax base over a seven county area penalizes Cities who have worked hard to create a greater industrial and commercial tax base and rewards communities who have chosen for environmental and ease of local service reasons to remain primarily residential. GIHEREAS, Minnesota already ranks seventh in our Nation in per capita, including State and local taxes, and additional taxes, peculiar to the metropolitan area, could conceivably cause an exodus of people, impede growth, create an adverse labor climate, promulgate loss of industry and commercial enterprises and curtail expansion and discourage construction of new facilities in the seven county metropolitan complex. WHEREAS, there is no provision to measure the operational efficiency and austerity , in budgeting of a community receiving the local tax revenues from another community, thus the tax would again be unfair in nature. � �OW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Fridley,�While realizing fiscal disparities do exist,�goes on record as being against the present legislation proposed in the new seven county tax program as proposed by ' the Metropolitan Section of the Minnesota League of Municipalities, as being detrimental to the overall economic advancement and welfare of the metropolitan area. �OPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS ,,a" DAY OF �'/J ' �TTEST: � CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL C L MAYOR - JACK 0. KIRKHAM , 1969. � f .� L. A. Chiea.Inc. requcst-considaration for tha Council to approve the isa- uance o° a new builair� permit for movament of houae and placement on lot deacribed ae: sll oP Lot 10� Auditor�e Subdivision Vo. 22 3n Anolsa County, i�iinnesota, axcept the Pollowin; deacribad tract commencing at the Pdortheaet cornor oP eaid Lot 10; thence 'r+est elong ths North line oP said Lot 10, aaid Plorth line 6eir�g the center- lins of 6jrd. Avemie V.E., a distanco of 88.5 Peet to tne actual pofnt oP beginnir�g of tho tract oP land to ba herin�described; thence South parallel with tha r^,ast line oP eeid Lot 10 a dietance oP 260 feet; thence Weat parallel with ths P7orth line o£ eaid Lot 10 a dietance of 138 feat; thenca ;?orth parallel with the Fast line of said Lot 10 a diatance of 260 faet to the north Iine oY said Lot 10; thence �ast a_ lor� aaid North line a diatanoe of lj8 faet to tha ectual point of boginning; eub- ject to the righta of the public over the I¢orth j0 feet theraoP Por road purposea. The City Council at the Council meating oP February 17, 1969, withdrew par- mieaion for isauance of parmit Pormovement of the dwelling to the parcel described abova. Previoue approval of tha Building-3tandarde-Daeign Control Subcomttiittee was given at their meeting on �?ovembsr 27, 1968. Request the City Qouncil grant new authority for the iasuance of the requeated permit, racommended by the Buildir�g 3tandarde-Design Oontrol 3u6committee. At preeent only one of the adjoning property ownera will eign as having no ob_ jections to movement of the housa into the area. A copy oP the statement of A:r. Iavern P. F'riend is attached hereto. Other adjoining proparty, sxcept for that of a}�Tr. & i•Ira. Thailmann, is owned by myselP. I requeat nerr authority, only if by doing eo� auch permission for iseuanca of permit can be accompliah�d without flzrther noceasity Por my appearin� before boards, commiesions or additional Public Hearinga. _� . _ �.. _ . �, .- By �pplying for new psrmiasion for iasuance of a permit I in no way relinquigh m y atand that the previous withdrawal of the permieaion to iseue a pernit was legal. Please place thie on the agenda for February 24, 1969 Por considaration in ordar that movament oP the buildirg and materiale can be accomplishad bq or on the 15th of :%iarch, 1969, when weight limite on g���}�}��j� streets will go into efPect. L. A. Chies, Inc. I�eeter A. Chiee �/C' GfC . C�/i"�4 . �'�,R�zf+��`J �� . . . . �..... _ ... �: . 11 I�M • ly. . . . . '4t. ,� �! . � � � � � . . � . , �p U�� }' CWIES BROTHEF�S CONTRACTDRS I —4020TYLERSTREETN.E. MINNEAPOLIS 21, MINNESOTA SU 0-2950 � �r , �." ;, �: y: T� ,�v��: y/,�t�-u-u. . �'�-�--�-,.. v�� r - ,i!2Crti�- % ��`�,� ,i�;' , • J, � C_ �l�L+ � ��-� �J� ; ',�r��W�22�-��r�� � � ��z _"'x.�-�--- / � � _, ' � J . i i ' ' " � �*� �-� � �.�� _ C��i�--� u� . �' � specia(rsts in/EXCAVATING . ROAD BLIILDING • WRECKING AND CRANE SERVICE � 5 7O 7O TON CAPACITY. BOaMS TO 20❑ FEET � y.