The URL can be used to link to this page

12/06/1971 - 5536JUEL MERCER - COUNCIL SECY. COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:30 P.M. DECEMBER 6, 1971 �� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - REGULA,R COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 6, 1971 - 7:30 P. M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATTON• + ROLL CALL• PRESENTATION OF TROPHY: Presented to the Fridley Tigers for Winning the 1971 Skyline Football Conference Championship � � APPROVAL OF MINUTES: � / Regular Council Meeting of November 15, 1971 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: VISITORS• (Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) e � � �' • � COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 2 �' � ' PUBLIC HEARINGS• ' 1. Continued Public Hearing (ZOA ��71-09) Castle Mobile Pages 1& 2 Hanes, Inc. ' �COrIlKENT: The recommendations of the Planning Commission from their meeting of November 17th are in the Agenda) � . -_ ' � OLD BUSINESS: _ . ' 2. Awarding of Bids for Workmen's Compensation Insurance ' Psges 3- 7 ;(Bids Opened 2:00 P. M., November 24, 1971) ' ' . . � . � / I � ! . I , , �I � , - 3. Consideration of Second Readirig of Ordiriance for Rezoning Pages 8& 9 i ' ! Request (ZOA ��71-07) Way Dar Land Corporation by Wayne Peterson to Rezone From R-3 to C-2 that Area Generally Located on the East Service Drive of T.H. ��47 North of '; ' S3rd Avenue �COMMEENT: We should hold up the second reading until the � developer processes the plans through the subcommittee and ? ` Council) ' ' ; ' • . 1 i ' i � 1 � , � � , i � I i � � �� , , J � �� ' � � , ' � �-. COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 3 OLD BUSINESS (CONTINUED) 4. Consideration of First Reading of CATV Ordinance 5. )iscussi�n �egzrling Rel�cati�n •f 115 KV Line Within City of Fridley _ CONIMENT: Mr. Johnson will be present to review with the Council the approval NSP has received from Burlington Northern to energize the line. I have also asked Mr. Johnson to give us a timetable as to the anticipated completion of this project) ..J .�� . . . . . NEW BUSINESS: 6. Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 17, 1971 � � � �� PaSe 10 • Pages 11 - Z8 � I � ' � r � , � , 1 1 1 � i. , I � . . � � , � � � , � G� COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 6, 1971 " PAGE 4 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) 7. Receiving the Minutes of the Building Standards - Pages 19 - 22 Design Control Meeting of November 23, 1971 ' -----� 8. Receiving the Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of November 23, 1971 n i / 9. Report Regarding SS&SW Project ��105-1 and Consideration of Awarding of the Contract (Bids Opened 11;30 A.M., November 15, 1971) SCOMhh1ENT: We have sent letters to the property owners advising them of bids 26% higher than the estimate and requesting their presence at the meeting) 0 � pages 23 - 25 � Pages 26 & 27 � COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 5 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) 10. Receiving Petition Regarding Request for 3 Way "Stop" pages 28 & 29 Sign on Madison Street and Lyric Lane -- -- -- - CO1�lENT: No accident record on the intersection. The traffic data is in the Agenda)', 11. Receiving Report Regarding Improvement of Area North of Osborne Road and East of East River Road and Consideration of Resolution Ordering Bids for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project ��102 • __ . . C01�4ENT: We are proposing the first phase of improvement under Project ��102 for utilities and storm sewer north of Osborne Road. If the City Council has any reservations, please advise) � i 12. Consideration of Resolution Approving of the Highway Lighting Maintenance Agreement SCOMMENT: The Highway Department is installing six lights on three intersections on T.H. 47. City'to pay maintenance and power) - 13. Consideration of Resolution Urging Participation by Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities in Funding a Recodification of all Local Criminal and Traffic Codes in the Metropolitan Area � Pages 30 - 36I Pages 37 - 41 I Pages 42 - 48 I COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 6 NEW $USINESS (CONTTNUED) I4. Consideration of Resolution Correcting Resolution ��14-Z971 Page 49 Confirming the Street Assessment for Street Improvement -�� Project ST. 1970-4 (Correcting Assessment on Lots 22 and 23, Block 7, Onaway Addition) ' 16. Appointment (City Employee) .,,� 17. Claims ■ 18. Licenses � 1 1° � Page 50 . I Page 51 Pages 52 & -53 � � ^ 1 � � . , � � ' ' , ' ' � r � � , � ' _ i 1 1¢ �� -f' • . COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE T NEW BiTSINESS (CONTINUED) . 19. Estimates Pages 54:& 55 20 . ` COMMI7NICATIONS : A. Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory, Inc: Blasting Limits Criteria B. Chief,Bureau of Fire Prevention; Park Construction Blasting J ADJOURN: . Pages 56 - 5$ Pages 59 - 66 THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING O� NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Kirkham led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. TNVOC:ATION : R�verend Mark Denyes, Fridley Assembly of God, offered the Invocation. Maypr Kirkham called the Regular Council Meeting of November 15, 1971 to order at 7:35 P.M. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Liebl, Harris, Breider, Kelshaw, Kirkham MEMBER5 ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1, 1971: MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 1, 1971 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE CANVAS$ OF VOTES MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 1971: MOTIDN by Councilman Kelshaw to adopt the Minutes of the Canvass of Votes Meeting of November 4, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 8, 1971: MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to adopt the Minutes of the Special Public Hearing Meeting of November 8, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Kirkham said there were a number of items to add to the Agenda as follows: 20A. Christmas Tree Lot Permit for ponald Chies 23A. Park Construction Company: Off-duty Policemen for Traffic 23B. Park Construction Company: Blasting Report 25. Appointment (Paula R. Long) Under Communications: D. Karen Dove: Complaint - Park Construction Company E. Office of Local & Urban Affairs: North Park Acquisition �.' Fridley Jaycees: Pxayer Breakfast Mayor Kirkham said he would also like to move #18 (Resolution on St. 1972-1 and St. 1972-2) to the first item in new business as there weXe ��o�le present on this item. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 2 MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt the Agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. VISITORS: Mr. C.L. McCline, 4009 Arthur Street, Columbia Heights: Request for Decision on Use of Substandard Lots: Mr. McCline said he had appeared before the Council previously on the matter of variances requested to enable them to use 40' lots. At that time the Council asked for some direction from the Planning Commission on what to do with tlzese substandard lots, and asked if there had been any answer yet. He added that he did not know what their position was with the unbuildable lots. Councilman Liebl said that he had talked to the interested parties and advised them that this be brought before the C�ouncil. He had made a motion to instruct the Administration or the Planninq Com¢nission to make a recommendation to the Council on the policy to use Por tlzese substandard lots. To date the Council has not received anything from them, and there is nothing on the Agenda tonight concerning this. He felt on lots of such size, the Council should have some sort of policy. Councilman Harris agreed and said that this item s,hould be on the Planning Comatiission Agenda before it comes back to the Council. The City Engineer said they did discuss this, but did not go into detail. There has been some checking on�lots in Hyde Park and Plymouth Addition that are sub- standard. The study should include how many lots are vacant and any rule made should apply to every 40' substandard lot. The Planning Commission has been involved in quite a few hearings and has not had time to deal with this prob- lem, but he would point out to them there is some urgency. Mayor Kirkham asked that this item be given some priority on their next Agenda. Mr. McCline said he would appreciate it as he does have a buyer standing by. Park Construction Company: Complaints on Blasting_and Burning: Mr. Winston Jacobson, 121 79th Way N.E., said that last Tuesday Park Construction Coanpany lit a torch to a pile of trees and he called �the Fire Chief on Wednes- day to find out why they could burn and he could not. He was told a permit has been issued by the Pollution Control Agency, and subsequently by Fridley. He said he talked to the PCA and was told that Park Construction Company was going to use a new method of burning trees. He said he advised them at the PCA office that Park was not using any new method, they were just burning trees. This fire was left burning unattended at night and he brought this fact to the attention of the Fire Chief and the Finance Director. Friday and Saturday it was still burning. It seems the only thing they were doing differently was to make several sma.11 piles rather than one big pile, but he still gets the black smoke at his house. He said since Park Construction Company does not seem to be able to follow the rules of the permit, he would like to see Fridley revoke their burning permit. Mr. Anthony Pikus, 4036 N.E. Main Street, said he had some comments to make reqarding the blasting by Park Construction Company. His house is cracking and the plaster is falling out. Earlier at the meetings the peop].e were assured there would be no damage to the peoples' houses and theX would not notice the blastinq. The permit was revoked in Columbia Heights, and he added that his l�ouse , REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 3 �I ' is falling apart more every day. He said he had called Councilman Liebl and a number of other people an� has been assured the damage would be paid for. 'I � He wondered when the damage would be fixed. He thought they had a level on the blasting so it would not affect the houses. , ' Councilman Liebl said yes, Mx. Pikus did call him. He said when the Council authorized the blasting pennit, they considered the fact that Fridley does have an agreement with Burlington Northern wherein they assure Fridley they would take out enough insurance to adequately cover any liability for damage. They also told Fridley they would install measuring devices. He said he has talked to Mayor Nawrocki of Columbia Heights and they are having a special Council meeting tonight in regard to Park Construction's blasting permit. Mayor Nawrocki would like to see some cooperation between Fridley and Columbia Heights for the protection of our citizens. Councilman Liebl said his recom- mendation wou13 be to have the Building Inspector go down this week and take a survey of all the property involved. There should be pictures taken as proof of the damage done in the past Eew weeks. Fridley cannot stop the company from doing their job. Columbia Heights and Fridley have committed themselves to the completion of the modern railroad yard, but they did try to protect the people by making sure the company would carry enough liability insurance. The City is obligated to do everything possible to protect these peoples' rights. Councilman Kelshaw asked Mr. Pikus if his house was inspected before the blasting. Mr. Pikus said no, it was missed when the rest of the homes were checked. He asked for an inspection, but no one came out. He added that he also had his own insurance on his house. Councilman Kelshaw said if there was damage done, to contact Park Construction Company's insurance company and file a claim rather than his own insurance company, Mr. Pikus asked if he could not be assured by Fridley that the blasting would be at a lower level. He asked if they could use as much powder as they want to? Mr. Robert Aldrich, Fire Prevention Bureau Chief, said he has talked to most of these people from time to time. He said he was no expert in this field, but as near as he could gather, there would be no structural damage below 2.0" per second according to the figures furnished by the Bureau of Mines. Most of the seismograph readings have been well within the accepted range. He said he could not say some homes have not been damaged, but it would be unwise to try to make a settlement when Park is still blasting. The Council Secretary reported that Mr. Gerald McDonald of Park Construction Company had been at the Council Meeting, but had to leave to attend a Council meeting in Columbia Heights, but had said he would come back up to Fridley as soon as he could. i, Councilman Liebl said that Fridley has committed itself to getting this job done, but it is the City's duty to help these people as much as possible if they do have damage. He said he understood Mr. Zimmer, 4021 California Street, has had some damage in his basement. Mr. Pikus asked if Fridley was assuring the residents that the damage would be repaired and Mayor Kirkham said the m st have '�, agreement provides that proof must be furnished, and the co pany mu liability insurance. As the Chief of the Fire Prevention Bureau 3dvises, it II ' would be better to wait until after the blasting is completed ta �ile any claims. ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 4 The City Attorney suggested there be a joint meeting between the two cities, Burlington Northern and Park Construction, so that the limitations would be uniform, if such is not already the case. He said he seemed to recall seeing some correspondence wherein Park Construction agreed to limit the amount of powder in each blast, and this should be investigated to see if they are sticking to that. It may be that the amount of powder may be reduced further. Councilman Liebl said that he believed they have reduced it already. The City Attorney said these complaints may be based on the blasting before the reduction. Mr. Pikus said th�.t he was talking about what has been happening the last few days. The blasts shake the whole house, and if this continues until next spring, there will have to be a new house built. Mayor Kirkham said the suggestiQn of the City Attorney was a good one, that the two cities should meet and try to get the level of the blasting down to where it is not affecting the neighbors. He said he would promise a meeting with Columbia Heights. Mr. Pikus said they just had a new ceiling put in their living room and it is already cracked. Mayor Kirkham said that the Fridley staff will also make an inspection so that Fridley will have its own record. Mr. For�est Cornelius, 4020 Main Street, said that the figures from the Bureau of Mines are w�ong. Park Construction is now in 15 feet of rock, and it seems they do not know how to proceed because of the deep rock. They were supposed to be done in Fridley in about two months. He said he has a new house and it now has hairline cracks. He questioned what was happening to his footings and foundation. There may be damage there, but to prove it, it would h�ve to be duq up. It just seems that nobody cares. Mayor Kirkham asked if he had registered a complaint with Fridley and Mr. Cornelius said no. Mayor Kirkham said that Fridley responds to the comprlaints we receive. Fridley is going to be working with Columbia Heights and will be getting together with Park Con- struction. Councilman Harris said the Council is concerned with the residents in this area, and he suggested that excerpts be taken from the agreement concerning the blasting and sent to these parties. Mr. Cornelius asked if there was anything in the agreement about dusty conditions and Councilman Breider said yes. Mr. Cornelius said he had talked to Park Construction and was told there was no agreement. Councilman Harris said there is an agreement, and this was why he made the suggestion to send portions of the agreement out to the people con- cerned with what thay feel are violations. Mr. Cornelius said that Thursday and Friday Columbia Heights took seismograph readings. He read them and they were from .8 to .9, however, with the .8 reading there were more vibrations than with the .9 reading. He asked them why this should be and they did not know. The figures they use as guidelines are obtained from the Bureau of Mines. Councilman Breider asked if the Fire Prevention Bureau Chief had checked the •finsurance reports to see if there were pictures and what back-up data they had. The Fire Prevention Bureau Chief said no, but there were on-site in- spections made. This was to be completed, and he assumed this was for the houses in Fridley. Councilman Harris said yes, this was part of the agx'ee- ment. Mr. Cornelius said he was told by an insurance man to file a clai.m, but why file a claim when the blasting is not done? He said he does not want to file a claim - he does npt want damage to his home. � � , r , , � C� � ' � ' , Ci , � �� , I � I � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 5 ' MOTION by Councilman Liebl to instruct the Building Inspector to inspect bpth interior and exterior of the homes in Fridley involved next to the construction � project. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Mrs. Pikus asked if they were going to continue blasting, and added that their living room ceiling was already cracked. Mr. Cornelius said this was like a cancer - you cannot see damage done in the ground to the footings and foundations. Mr. Henry Zimmer, 4021 California Street, said that if the Council would revoke ' the permit to blast until a full inspection is made, the company would come around and state the damage would be taken care of. He said he had a stucco house that is cracked, and there is an apaxtment house near him that is cracked ' also. Mr, Dick Smith (Barton Construction) has checked the houses and he is telling people that their houses are poorly constructed and the cracks were there before. He said they were caused by the cold weather. Mr. Smith has said they would buy the paint to paint over for the inside, but Mr. Zimaner ' said he did not know what could be done with the stucco. If Park's permit was revoked, it would force them to come before the Council to get it rein- stated. ' THE VOTE upon the motion, being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. � Mrs. Pikus said then until this is checked out, they will continue blasting. Councilman Harris said that the Council expects Mr. McDonald to attend the meeting later this evening and then Fridley will have a report on what has ,' been done in Columbia Heights. This will have an impact on Fridley's decision. Fridley will be moving on this the first thing in the morning. Mrs. Pikus said that her bathroom ceiling is tiled, which is unusual, and the grouting is �� falling out. She had Mr. McDonald come to her house and she was told by Mr. McDonald that he regrouts every year. Councilman Breider asked the Fire Prevention Bureau Chief about Pax�k's burning ', violation. Mr. Aldrich said that he had informed Mr. McDonald when he received the complaint about leaving the burning unattended, that his permit was in � jeopardy, and that it had to be attenc�ed. Friday night they bulldozed the site � and piled dirt on it, and obviously thought it was out, but it was not. Saturday night he went up there and it was still burning. He said he knew of no special method of burning. Councilman Kelshaw asked if the permit was � granted by the PCA on the basis that there was some new method of burning. Mr. Jacobson said that is what he was told. Councilman KeZshaw asked if Fridley granted the permit on the basis that the PCA authorized it. The Fire Prevention ' Bureau Chief said that if anyone wants to burn, he makes application to the I� PCA through his office and he forwards it on. If the PCA approves the permit, then Fridley has to approve it. Councilman Liebl wondered if Fridley could not revoke the permit if there was a violation. The City Attorney asked if ,' the permit was from the PCA or the City. The Fire Prevention Bureau Chief said it is from both. The City cannot give a permit without PCA approval. � Councilman Breider said that Park Construction has been notified and if they , � are in violation once more, the permit will be revoked. The Fire Prevention Bureau Chief said yes, this is what he told them this morning. , � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 6 ORDINANCE #495 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1972: MoTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Ordinance #495 on second reading, waive the reading and order publication. 5econded by Councilman Breider. Upon a roll call vote, Kirkham, Liebl, Harris, Breide•r and Kelshaw voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF IS"SUING LIQUOR LICENSES, SHOREWOOD LOUNGE AND EAST RIVER ROAD LOUNGE: Mr. Connie Rallis said he comes before the Council tonight as a complainer, not as a pleader. He has over $100.000 tied up in the remodeling, and has not collected a dime. The contract for deed has l�een signed by the Mayor and City Manager, but he had not received it, The roof is on and he would like to start moving his equipment in, but he badly needs these licenses to do that. The City Manager called the Council's attention to the progress report the Building Inspection Department made this day at both locations. They state the contractor estimates the construction to be approximately 50$ completed. This is more substantial than at the, ]ast meeting. Mr. Rallis said they wanted to start work and this is holding them up. The City Manager said that even if the licenses are authorized now, there would be at least a 10 day lag because of the details involved in the actual transfer of the property. There would have to be an inventory taken of the stock on hand. �The employees have alreadX been given their notice in compliance with the union agreement. Councilman Liebl said the Nicklows have invested a considerable amount of money and now need their licenses to proceed further. Mr. Rallis explained that they have equipment worth thousands of dollars and before they put it in, they have to be the owners and someone has to be there. MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to grant the liquor licenses for Shorewood Lounge and the East River Road Lounge based on the report received this date, to be effective November 29, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Harris. The City Attorney asked when they would be ready to serve food and Mr. Rallis replied he thought the latter part of December. THE VOTE upon the motion, being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF FINAL REVIEW: TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT, ROGER LARSON: NORTH 813 FEET OF NE�a OF THE NE�a �F SECTZON 13: (Tabled 11-1-71) The City Engineer said that �he report on the two types of FHA programs can be found in the Council Agenda. Mr. Frank Reese, Architect for the De�elopment, came forward and showed an elevation and the plans on the easel. Each building will have six three bed- room units. There will be brick facing up to the second floor level. The distance from the front door to the garage is about 75 feet and the distance from the back of one building to another would be between 55' to 65'. The units along 69th Avenue have brick fireplaces. The sides of the garages along 69th Avenue will be brick. The other materi«1 used is prefinished paneling which has a 15 year guarantee and seems to be very permanent. The center units in each building protrude 8 feet in front of the other units on � ' ' ' � � ' a ' ' ' ' r f_ � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 7 each side to give an interesting shadow effect. Councilman Harris asked how the backs of the buildings are treated. Mr. Reese said they are using dif- ferent color stains along with the large sliding patio door5. There is no brick in the back of the buildings. Councilman Harri.s asked if it was correct there were five fireplaces for 141 units and Mr. Reese said yes. Councilman Harris said that using the multiple units concept and applying it to town- houses, there is a requirement that 50$ of the construction materials be some- thing other than wood. Mr. Jim Wiensch, Partner, commented that in that case, Fridley could not accept Frank Lloyd Wright. He continued that originally the plans were for 200 apartments to be rented at about $150 -$190 and this has been cut down to 141 units with a rent of $270. Councilman Breider asked if the brick colors would be staggered and Mr. Reese said yes. He then asked how many units total would have brick fronts and Mr. Reese replied 72. Councilman Breider asked what they would use to treat the plywood panels in 15 years when the guarantee runs out. Mr. Reese said some type of acrylic paint rather than a lead or oil paint. He added that there are quarantees being given on this type of paint now too. Councilman Harris said he noticed on the buildings behind Lynwood Bowl, there was some problems with the paint peeling. Mr. Wiensch said the problem stemmed from the fact the paint was put on the gutters and down-spouts right away and it should have waited a year. If not properly prepared the paint will not stay on. They were painted in November, which is not a good time to paint. Mr. Wiensch said he was not too happy with the use of the prefinished panels either, because of the maintenance and suggested they could be stucco. Mr. Reese showed a sample of the paneling at the Council table and said he had it on his home for 13 years and there has been no pro- blems with fading. A lot of research went into what materials were used on other townhouses that were most durable. Mr. Wiensch said there may be a problem of water catching in that area and there could be paint peeling, therefore, he would favor stucco. Councilman Harris agreed he w�ould like to see something other than the panels. He asked if there was a single door, or if there was some sort of storm or screen door. Mr. Wiensch said there would be a single door guaranteed for 20 years with no storm or screen door. He added the units would be centrally air conditioned, so there would be no need for a screen door. Councilman Harris asked what type of windows would be used. Mr. Reese said they wo�ald be aluminum with an anodized coating put on at the factory. There would be concrete steps in front. Councilman Harris asked if there would be window wells and if they would be covered. Mr. Wiensch said the window wells are about � in and � out of the ground,so they would not be covered. Councilman Liebl asked Mr. Larson with the additional brick, stucco and fire- ' places on 69th, what is the cost per unit. Mr. Larson said about $22,000 in construction costs before adding the brick and fireplaces. Councilman Liebl asked if they were all three bedroom units with full basements and the full compliment of appliances and Mr. Larson said yes. Councilman Harris asked 1 if the garage is included in the price of the rent and Mr. Larson said yes, a garage is assigned to each tenant. Councilman Liebl commented that they have come a long way from what they originally proposed. � � ' Councilman Harris asked how many different types of brick they would be using. Mr.'Reese said probably four. Mr. Wiensch added that they have hired a� artis� to coordinate the colors. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 8 The City Engineer said he would like to point out that if the Council approves this plan, there are still things required in the Code they wil� have to do, such as curbing on 69th Avenue. At the last meeting, he mentioned that the developer should provide access to the park along with s�x parking spaces. His department also feels there should be additional parking space provided. There are two parking spaces provided for each three bedroom unit, but the ordinance for R-3 requires 2� parking spaces. Perhaps a compromise would be to provide 2� parking spaces for each unit. There is room for this. Mr. Wiensch said they would provide the park access and the six parking spaces by the park. They feel there would probably be 50� of the tenants with 2 cars and 50$ with 1 car. The ordinance is for apartments, not townhouses. He would like to point out that with the addition.of every new parking space, some green area is lost. They would be willing to sign a letter that they will put in t.he additional parking if it proves necessary, but they would hate to put in unused blacktop at the expense of losing some green area. He added that as a rule you do not get individuals renting townhouses, you get families. The City Attorney suggested the City Engineer and the Architect might delineate on the plans where the additional 35 parking spaces would be located if they should be needed. MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the plans with the following stipu- lations: #1. The wood panels are to be removed and replaced with stucco. #2. There are to be five fireplaces on 69th Avenue. #3. The sides of the garages facing 69th Avenue.are to be bricked. #4. The colors of the brick are to be staggered to achieve a pleasing effect. #5. Receipt of a letter from the developers they will agree to put in an additional 35 parking spaces if it proves necessary after review �8 months after completion of the project. A map is to be included deli- neating the location of the parking spaces. #6. They will provide access to the park and six additional parking spaces by the park. The motion was seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUT�ON #147-1971 - ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECTFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1972-1 & ST. 1972-2 (MSAS): The Council noted that the petition against the improvement of Clover Place has been withdrawn as the people have changed their minds. MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to adopt Resolution #147-1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. FIRST READING OF AN OR.DINANCE FOR REZONING REQUEST ZOA #71-07 WAY AAR LAND CORPORATION BY WAYNE PETERSON TO REZONE FROM R-3 TO C-2 THAT AREA GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SERVICE DRIVE OF T.H. #47 NORTH OF 53RD AVENUE: MOTION�by Councilman Liebl to approve the ordinance on first reading and wa�ve th� reading. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 9 Councilman Harris asked if this would affect in any way the City'& p�ans to request the Highway Departr,�ent to move their fence so Fridley can use the land by the highway for a park. The City Engineer said it would hav� no effect, He suggested getting a letter from the developers agreeing to pave the alley at no cost to the adjoining property owners. He hoped the other two gas stations would also agree to this to get the alley opened through. Mr. Leona�Cd Samuelson said he would agree to this and thought the gas station owners wauld also as it would be an advantage to all of them. THE VOTE upon the motion, being a ro11 call vote, Liebl, Harris, Breider, Kelshaw and Kirkham voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR VACATION OF A STREET AND ALLEY SAV #71-04, BY EDGAR W. HOUSER, GENERALLY LOCATED AT GUMWOOD STREET BETWEEN 77TH WAY AND 78TH WAY AND EAST OF TI�E RAILROAD TRACKS: MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the ordinance on first reading and waive the reading. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a roll call vote, Kirkham, Liebl, Harris, Breider and Kelshaw voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 3, 1971: 1. REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #71-08, GENERAL REALTY: Lots 16 through 22, Block 13, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville to be rezoned from R-3 (general multiple family dwellings) to C-2 (general business areas) MOTION by Councilman Liebl to set the Public Hearing for the rezoning request � by General Realty for December 13, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. � ,J ' ' 2. REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #71-09, BY CASTLE MOBILE HOMES, INC.: The westerly 600 feet of the northerly 750 feet of the NE� of the NW�a of Section 12 to be rezoned from M-1 (light industrial areas) to C-2S (general shopping areas) The City Engineer reported the Planning Commission has not yet made their recommendation, so there is no Council action necessary. 3. REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP. #71-14, CASTLE MOBILE HOMES, INC.: � As per Section 45.101 3N of the Fridley City Code for the location of mobile homes sales on the westerly 600 feet of the southerly 320 feet of the northerly 750 feet of the NE�S of the NW� of Section 12. � � � � The City Engineer reported that the Planning Commission has not yet made theiX recommendation on this item either, so there is no Council action necessary. 4. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #71-03, BY VIEWCON, INC.: For Phase I and II for the townhouse area generally located � mile east of Matterhorn Drive and �a mile north of Interstate #694, being a replat of Outlo� F, Innsbruck North, Section 24. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 10 MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to set the Public Hearing for the final plat by Viewcon for December 13, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. FINAL TOWNHOUSE PLAN, VIEWCON, INC.: For Phase I and II for the townhouse a�a generally loca��a mile east of Matterhorn Drive and � mile north of Interstate #694, described as Outlot F, Innsbruck North, Section 24. The City Engineer reported the Planning Commission recommended approval and showed the plan on the easel. �l ' � ' ' MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upan a voice vote, all voting � aye, Mayor Kirkham declaxed the motion carried unanimously. 6. VACATION REQUEST: SAV #71-06, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #16: Request to vacate 75� Avenue from Lakeside to proposed Cleveland Stxeet and pro- posed Cleveland Street from 75�i Avenue north 240 feet. This item was continued by the Planning Commission. 7. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-11, ALBERT M. JOHNSON: Lot 2, Block 1, A1 Rose Addition, to split off the north 19 feet of Lot 2 and add to Lot 1. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant the request for a lot split by Albert Johnson. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-12, WALLACE E. ANDERSON: Lot 6, Block 1, Adams Street Addition. To split off the south 26 2/3 feet and add to Lot 7 for a buildable site, and add the north 13 1/3 feet of Lot 6 to Lot 5. 9. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71^13, WALLACE E. ANDERSON: Lot 4, Block 1, Adams �treet Addition. To split off the north 26 2/3 feet of Lot 4 and add to Lot 3 and to split off the south 13 ],/3 f��t af Lot 4 and add to Lot 5. The City Engineer showed the area on the overhead projector and said these two requests were to eombine five 40' lots and make three lots out of them. The resulting lots would then be 66 2/3 feet wide. This does not meet the standard lot size, however, these lots were platted many years ago and seems to be the best use of these 40' lots. Councilman Liebl asked if granting this request would be setting a precident and the City Attarney said that because it is done once, does not make any action legally binding. Every situation has to be considered on its meXits, Mayor Kirkham added that this type of split has aJ.ready been granted in thi� area. Councilman Harris commented that this seem� to be the most logical usa pf the substandard lots. MOTTON by Councilman Kelshaw t4 concur with the Planning Commisison and grant the requests for the lot s�lits requested by Wallace Anderson. Secanded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kixkham declared the motion carried unanimously. � �� 1 1 ' , � ' � II , REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 11 MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 3, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 1971: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN EXPANSION ONTO THE PRESENT BUILDING LOCATED ON PART OF LOT 1, AUDiTOR'S SUBDIVISION #78, THE SAME BEING 5320 MAIN STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421. (REQUEST BY MIDI.AND CO-OP, 5320 MALN STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421): The City Engineer said this request is for an addition onto Midland Co-op at the north end of their existing building. The Board recommended approval of their plans. Mr. L.E. Torrey, Midland Co-op, and Mr. Peter Zubert, Adolph.son & Peterson, were present and came forward and showed a color rendering o� their plans. The addition would total about 133,000 square feet and would be used primarily for a warehouse and storage, but approximately 10,000 square feet would be used for meeting rooms, offices etc. Councilman Harris asked if they would then be removing the mobile home they have been using for an office and Mr. Torrey said yes. Mayor Kirkham commented that it appears they are dressing up their parking lot. Mr. Zubert said yes, there will be curbing around the parking lot, and adding space for approximately 100 cars. They are also planning to do some landscaping. The City Engineer said they have been very considerate, and when they were developing their plans, they came into his office to find out the sort of things the City would like to see on the plans. Councilman Harris asked what was used for the exterior surface. Mr. Torrey said it would be three-score concrete block with dark stained glass panels in between. He showed the change in the canopy to the Council and Mr. Zubert added that the three-score block looks like brick standing on end. The addition will fit in with the existing building. � Councilman Liebl asked about control of the dust problem and Mr. Torrey said ' this would be taken care of and the City Engineer added there will be concrete curbing around the new area and precast curbing around the old area so there will be no sand problem. , � ' ' t Ci MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the plans as presented for Midland Co- op. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the Minutes of the Building Standards - Design Control Meeting of November 4, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CGNTRACT, 14 FOOT ONE TON VAN TRUCK: (Bids Opened 12:00 Noon, November 10, 1971) Name Iten Chevrolet Inc. 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnespta Surety Certified Check $224.50 Base Bid $4,490.00 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 Name Suburban Chevrolet Hopkins, Minnesota Surety Bid Bond 5� Federated Ins. Co. PAGE 12 Base Bid $4,703.62 The City Manager reported that this item was approved in the 1972 budget and the reason bids were called for now was so they would fall under the price freeze. There are 60 days in which to award the bid, so he would suggest the bids be received and the award be made right after the first of the year. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the bids as presented. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimousl:y. RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT: SEWER, WP.TER AND STORM SEWER PRfJJECT NUMBER 105 - l: (Bids Opened 11:30 A.M., November 15, 1971) Bid Base Alternate Base Plus Planholders Deposit Bid Bid Alternate (Add) R,�ndall & Berglin, Inc. Cap. Ind. Corp. $26,800.00 $10,000.00 $36,800.00 6801 Plaza Curve 5� B.B. Minneapolis, Minn. 55432 Dycon Corp. U.S. Fid. & $22,793.90 $ 6,000.00 $28,793.90 Route No. 1 Guaranty Co. Monticello, Minn. 55362 5� B.B. Erwin Montgomery Const. Co. Ohio Farmers Ins.$29,555.50 $ 3,000.00 $32,555.50 10883 89th Ave. No. 5% B.B. Osseo, Minn. 55369 Metro Engineerinq, Inc. Cap. Ind. Corp. $32,450.00 $ 5,500.00 $37,950.00 (45 Cal. 3200 97th Ave. No. 5� B.B. Days) , Osseo, Minn. 55369 Minn-Kota Excavating Inc. Argonaut Ins. Co.$26,036.00 $ 3,000.00 $29,036.00 (As per 3401 85th Ave. No. 5� B.B. 5pecs.), Minneapolis, Minn.55443 The City Engineer reported the bids received Were $4,000 higher than the engineering estimate of the project. The problem in this area is the bad soil conditions and the high water table. He asked Mr. Vanderlinde if there was any chance of getting a better price. Mr. Paul Vanderlinde, Comstock & Davis, Inc., Consulting Engineers, said this was probably the best price they could get, considering the bad conditions in this area. The City Engineer said the award does not have to be made for 30 days, and perhaps the Council should wait until the meeting of the 6th to give his department time to talk to the contractor. Perhaps something could be dane through a change order. Councilman Harris asked what was the engineering estimate and Mr. Vanderlinde replied $i8,500. Councilman Harris asked what the alternate was for, and the City Engineer replied this was to cover the cost of back fill material, in case they should have to buy it, but he was fairly certain they could get it from Burlington Northern. � � �� ' � ' �- ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 lJ u ' !_J 1 �- L� � , ' � ' � ' , ' PAGE 13 MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the bids and request that they be put back on the Agenda for the December 6, 1971 Meeting. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye� Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously, RECEIVING STATUS REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF OPEN SPACE APPLIGATION T'OR RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS FLOOD PLAIN AREA: MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the communication from Peter �. Herlofsky dated November 10, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham c]eclared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING REPORT ON SWIMMING POOL PROJECT: MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the memorandum from the Parks and Recreation Director dated November 10, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl, Councilman Liebl asked what the "Other Expenses" were listed on Page 30 which amount to $34,000 for a 90 day season and $52,000 for a 270 day season. The Parks Director said they were compiled in the same way the budget is, and that amount would cover supplies, equipment, communications etc., and all the expenses other than the personal services that there would be in the operation of a pool. Councilman Liebl asked if it would meet Olympic standards and the Parks Director said that would certainly be his recommendation. Councilman Kelshaw said he was very surprised to see that the Parks Director estimates it would cost $132,000 for a 9 month season. The Parks Director said yes, there would be some funds collected through cha�ges, but it would not be a self- sustaining program. He added these are only estimated costs based on the figures he received. He said he did not know how this would be funded or the method of payment. Bloomington has both an indoor and outdoor pool. Councilman Breider asked the Parks Director to try to get some sort of ball park figure on the costs of an indoor/outdoor pool. It was pointed out Brooklyn Center has an indoor pool as part of their municipal complex. Councilman Liebl suggested the Parks Director find out what the income received from the operation of the pool has been in Bloomington and Edina for the last two years, alsp how many people they accommodated. The Parks Director said that for an outdoor pool, fencing would have to be considered, along with the health factors. THE VOTE upon the motion, being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT WITH NEW BRIGHTON REGARDING WATER AND 3EWER LATERAL AND SERVICES ON STIIVSON BOULEVARA: MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the agreement betaeen Fridley and New Brighton as contained in the Agenda. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDE�2ATION OF CHANGE ORDER #G2.FOR AN ADDITION TO THE MUNICIPAL GARAGE: ' MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the Ch�nge Order #G2 for the addition to the municipal garage for Loeffel-Engstrand Company in the amount of $193.00 necessitated because of additional excavation due to soil conditions. Secondec� ' by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 14 , CONSIDERATION OF HEALTH SANITARIAN QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 4, 1971: MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the quarterly activity repox't by the Health Sanitarian dated November 4, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Harri5. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #148-1971 - ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND E5TIMATE5 OF THE COSTS THER�;OF: WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PRTx7ECT #102, ADDENDUM #1: MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #148-1971. Seconded by Council-- man Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #149-1971 - RECEIVING THE PRELIMIN.ARY REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PR(JJECT #102, ADDENDUM #1: MOTION by Councilman Breider to adogt Resolution #149-1971. Seconded by Council- man Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #150-1971 - DESIGNATING CERTAIN STREETS IN FRIDLEY 5ELECTED TO BE PART OF THE FEDERAL AID URB11N SYSTEM: Councilman Breider asked just what this system entailed. The City Engineer said that once the freeway progr�m is completed in the United States, it is hoped there will be money available for use on secondary roads. There is improvement needed on East River Road and this would be a request for Federal Aid for the improvement of this road. Councilman Breider asked if this would mean that East River Road would become an arterial road, such as University Avenue. The City Engineer said no, this would still be a county road, and added that this may be five years from now, and any plans for East River Road would still have to come before the Council for approval. MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to adopt Resolution #150-1971. Seconded by Council- man Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve payment of General Claims #26781 through #26978 and Liquor Claims #6104 through #6155. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanirnously. LICENSES: Vending Machine Approved By ' , , ' r I� � ' , � II � ' u , , Buzz's Barber Shop 6247 University Avenue , Fridley, Minnesota By: E.W. Arndt Health Inspector I�� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 LICENSES CONTINUED: Christmas Tree Lot 755 53rd Avenue Fridley, Minnesota By: Donald Newcomb 280 Mississippi St. Fridley, Minnesota By: Ernest Fitch Donald Chies 4020 N.E. Tyler St. Minneapolis, Minn. Location: 1136 73� Ave. N.E. By: Donald Chies Off Sale Beer Mike's Gulf 7315 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Minnesota General Contractor Balsiger Contracting Company 2113 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, Minn. 55402 Car-Don Construction ' 1729 Crystal Avenue St. Paul, Minn. Nu-Vista Exteriors, Inc. ' 801 Excelsior Avenue Hopkins, Minn. 55343 ' , Masonry Contractor Biagini Brothers, Inc. 1064 Payne Avenue St. Paul, Minn. By: Michael Ammend By: Gordon W. Griffin By: Donald F. Palme By: John W. Edwards By: Otto Biagini PAGE 15 Approved By' Fire Inspector Fire Inspector Fire Inspector Health Inspector Building Inspector Bui2ding Inspector Building Inspector Building Inspector MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to approve the licenses as submitted. Seconded by ' Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kir�ham declared the motion carried unanimously. ' COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ESTIMATES OF LOEFFEL-ENGSTRAND COMPANY (SECOND PAYMENT) AI�ID HARRIS BROTHERS PLUMBING COMPANY (FIRST PAYMENT) - MUNICIPAL GAR�IGE: (Requested by Firemen's Pension Association) ' MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve payment of the second estimate by Loeffel-Engstrand in the amount of $19,075.50 and the first estimate by Harris Brothers Plumbing Company in the amount of $3,919.50, payment to be made by ' the Firemen's Pension Association. 5econded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. ' REGULAR COUNCiL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 16 ' ESTIMATE: Weaver; Talle & Herrick 316 East Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 November Billing $2,723.20 MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve payment of the estimate as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #151-1971 - REQUESTING PART OF SEC. 3, TWP 30, RANGE 24 IN THE GENERAZ AREA OF NORTHERN CITY LIMITS, SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF PLATTED PRO- PERTY KNOWN AS SPRING BROOK PARK AND WESTERLY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN TRACKS, ALSO KNOWN AS PLAT #53903, PARCEL #1260, WHICH IS NOW TAX FORFEIT, TO BE DEEDED TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #151-1971. Seconded by Council- man Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. NOTE: The Park Construction Company items were scheduled to be at this time, but as Mr. McDonald was not yet present, the Council chose to finish the rest of the Agenda items first, then come back to :this topic. COMMUI3ICATIONS: A. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS: REVOCATION OF PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BI,ASTING PERMIT: MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the communication from Columbia Heights, Malcolm Watson, City Manager, dated November 8, 1971. 5econded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a vaice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declax�ed the motion carried unanimously. B. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #16: POSITION STATEMENT ON CATV: MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to receive the communication from School District #16 dated November 9, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, ali ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. C. NSP: PROGRESS REPORT ON RELOCATION OF 115 KV LINE DATED NOVEMBER 11, 1971: MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to receive the progress report from NSP dated I3ovember 11, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkha�► declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman xarris asked if NSP was going to pick up the poles alonq 69th Avenus, or place them in the ground, or do they just plan on putting in the three they have put in. The City Manager said he has asked them if they are no� going to put them in the ground, to put them out of sight. NSP has indicated that it is getting late in the season to be digging because of the frost. ' ' LJ LJ C! , i� ' �� 1 ' ' ' � � ' � ' ' I� ' ' � , ' , , � ' ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 17 Councilman Harris said he would like to ask that NSP and Burlington No�thern appear before the Council at the next regular meeting. There was nothing in the contract about induction, or anything else, and Fridley was le�t holding the �ag. The City Manager said as he previously indicated, the Council requested a meeting with NSP and Burlington Northern, but NSP fee18 they are proceeding satisfactorily with their negotiations with Burlington Northern, � a third party might upset their negotiations. They would be happy to meet after the first of the year if nothing has been resolved before that time. Councilman Harris said he would like to have them appear at the next meeting. Councilman Liebl commented that there really does not seem to be any- thing NSP can do, Burlington Northern is holding things up. That line cannot come down until the new one can be energized or a large part of Fridley will be without power. D. KAREN DOVE: COMPLAINT: PARK CONSTRUCTION BLASTING PERMIT: MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to receive the communication from Karen Dove, in Columbia Heights dated November 14, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upc�n a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. , E. OFFICE OF LOCAL & URSAN AFFAIRS: NORTH PARK ACQUISITION: MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to receive the information from the Office of Local & Urban Affairs dated November 12, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. F. FRIDLEY JAYCEES: PRAYER BREAKFAST: MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the communication from the Fridley Jaycees regarding their prayer breakfast. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carxied unanimously. ' APPOINTMENT: (City Employee) Name Position ' Paula R. Long Accounting 7473 West Circle Drive Clerk Fridley, Minnesota ' ' ' ' � Effective Date Replaces November 24, 1971 Ferne M. Insley MOTION by Councilman Breider to concur in the appointment of Paula R. Long. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDEI3ATION OF PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY REQUEST FOR USE OF OFF-DUTY POLICE- MEN FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL: Councilman Liebl said that he understood Park Construction Company approached the Chief of Police to ask if off-duty policemen could be used as �lagmen for the control of the truck traffic. He questioned how the pay was axranged. The City Manager said he had talked to the Chief of Police, there was an �z'rangemen� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971 PAGE 18 made for the Chief to schedule his off-duty men to work. The scheduling was done by the Chief so that he would be aware of who was going to work when. Park Construction Company paid the Chief of Police, and he in turn paid the men. The Chief of Police has told him that for anything other than highway construction there must be a sworn police officer for the direction of traffic. There was a disagreement between the unioa representatives and so Fridley asked Park Construction to formally request the use of off-duty policemen at no cost to the City. The City will not be involved, except in the scheduling of the hours. Mayor Kirkham said he felt the City should continue to Pollow this procedure as he would not want unqualified men acting as flagmen. Councilman Breider said if the City is agreeable to this arrangement, then he tYiought the payment should be directly between Park Construction Company and the men. The Finance Director agreed, because of the problems they would then have with retirement, workmens compensation, insurance etc. Councilman Liebl said that if anyone is in a position of receiving dispensation, there should be proof of how much was received and how much Nas paid. The union for Park Construc- tion feels they can use their own flagmen. The City Manager said if the Council agrees to the use of the aff-duty men, the pay should be at the prevailing labor rate scale. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the communication from Park Construction Company dated November 15, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the use of off-duty policemen to control and direct traffic for Park Construction Company, with the scheduling of work to go through the Chief of Police and the payroll to be at the prevailing wage scale directly between Park Construction Company and the men. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BLASTING REPORT: The Council noted that Mr. McDonald, Park Construction Company, was not present, but they could not wait any longer. Councilman Liebl commented that there was already a motion passed to instruct the Building Inspector to inspect the homes under the jurisdiction of Fridley. MOTION by Councilman Harris to ask that a consulting engineer be present to monitor the blasts so Fridley will have their own spot coverage, the cost of the consulting engineer to be paid by Park Construction Company. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Councilman Harris said as to a joint meeting between the two councils, that he thought that the first meeting should be at the staff level with the Columbia Heights City Manager, the Fridley City Manager and the two attorneys. He added that if Park Construction refuses to pay the cost of the consulting engineer, perhaps the blasting should be stopped, at least temporarily. Councilman Liebl said that a great deal depends on the location that the monitoring is done. Council,man Harris said this is why he suqgested a consultant skilled in demolitions. If Park does not agree to the cost, the Council should call a meeting very soon. i� � � � � , ' , , ' �I ' , C'' CI , , , I, ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1S, 1971 PAGE 19 ' THE VOTE upon the motion, being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayo� Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. IADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded and ' upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried and the Regular Council Meeting of November 15, 1971 adjourned at 10:00 P.M. , R ectfull submitted P Y � � �� ,' Juel A. Mercer Jack O. Kirkham , Secretary to the City Council Mayor , ' ' ' I ' , ' ' , ' ' � ' OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCEKN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public H�arir►g of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Ha1.1_ at G431 University Avenue Northeast on November 8, 1971 in the Council. Ctiarnber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a rezoning request, ZOA ��71-09, by Castle Mobile Homes, Inc., to rezone the Westerly 600 feet of the Northerly 750 feet of the Northeast Quarter of ttie Northwest Quarter of Section 12, from M-1 (light ir.dustrial areas) to C-2S (generaZ shopping area), lying in Section 12, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located at the Southeast corner of Osborne Road and High�vay ��65. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be heard at this time. JACK 0, KIRY�iAM MAXOK Publish: October 20, 1971 October 27, 1971 � � . -.. I . , ` � . V !�► ` , - , � `. 1 . : _ . , , ._ � � r . . - - r---- --�t�: ---�e�� Zo . a: . _.. .�,- . � . '- " =� , �► '� ,�s,o; -LiM1T 0F CI � G P � LA��`RT �: ,s� ;S ?' �o>; h4s°� . � �. �r r� ^ ih Ni t " �ouu�A4.Y (7� n � � .. :J � ' R�a�c6 � A D�l T I��l � z3� � ,, _ ; --- rzssc> _ '' � .,,��: ..� n . _ . 1 ifj•YJail G Ouirne/fE � � i �� ' • soo --- � . �� ._ _ -- --- - ---- --- -- -- ---. �.,_: � `' m ' . ti �' � 2�/O� � : c� :� � �•VD. �.i,u5� �F �oEC�AL (�S£ h;Y��'f RC.�G�:"�' An-✓e�r Tivc/�ng a : ! •^- r e - s •T p � cr _ � .i.. �. �. � .caci. .. � �. . ; . � ' +' N ' ' ... F"c'O �.. . "" ' . i6 r$.' .' .. .._. _ - .... ..'_'_ "_..__' __ � . . '� . .. � . . . ' . . . . ' �,. . . . I .. . _ .. . � � � �Z6TO% � � - - . _ �_z __.�_ ------ - ��ito,.GOvi•netfe�'f�0 G�aad ' �._�. - - • ; � .`� _.;' -^��"-rii7C � . . . � � . . � . . . .� +��- G _S c"i+ . . ' , . � l . � � , . ' ' _'_. . ° ._ . .. . ... '. ':�" +�a ti: ,. �i."_�__— ____."__'—__._�. _.�-__ _ �� _ � ` ��[ � , . • . . .... . . ._ '._..._.'. _._'_.._:._.. _ _' " ."_ _ . �. �. . . . � . - ;� � � ' � � � ' � � �i 1 Z�iQ,'' _ . .. ' Ju� Re� /fy C��. ,�G l' � �t -` �o vY SA�. A . -Z ��,� : • ' ( i+; : , � -' �. ✓iraA r?G: � `/ ..�� 1 � I ...... �.........�.._..�,...�.� �/y � � r 3 ` --- — _ _ _ _ _ _ -- - ----- l� J �, o ' � p W �� - --- - --- --- ---- - ---- _.. -------_.. _.--._ ------- - --- -._. .- __- --- — - + ' 6on . .. ' O .. r �,., . ; . . . . . ' � �I� iZgsoi !2E.�Gi � :� � • � � � . ' ^ _ a�� - _ ---- _ _ _.-___ _ _ _'_ - . Y ��'� 1 j• -\ I � _, � .,,} _ . ! t+ iav '. . ?? �t - .� � � . � �°' � � � . ..�,,,,,. T 4,+;z' ; . s �. -d-• :.�;0 � �2£f_Scs , ' -� . � � ' . � t�'� . � J�' ` . . • � � � �� . ' hB��,729 � . ,c I I , ��ZOO, ,' � ' -- --- - — -- �_ _ . - - -- i ifli/fon, (i Guiin effe �'.:' , i ' �4.iSo � ' � . '. � 1 'J . rY s G �.. . . � � � � �I �, ' � �� i�, �_�,__�__--__________�-.-. � ` ' � "' _ _ _ --_.__ --- , �1. '.00 � L3 � ' ,��._._ _.. _.._. -- _ - �66 { E.jsz f � � I ' ,' ` , � � ��i � � � • � . � � � t („/el � � i,. � re ��; .-? �Prvo.�f � O ' � , ' ' L_� ' ' ' � ' � � �, � � I� ' � I ' OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER FRIDL�Y, MINNESOTA December 3, 1971 MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE PLAN Enclosed please find a report from Mr. Leland C. Douglas, Vice President, Bachman-Anderson, Inc., who serves as insurance consultant for the City of Fridley. I have discussed the bids with Mr. Douglas and would agree with his conclusion that a Loss Participating Plan on a one year basis would be in the best interest of the City. Enclosed for your information are definitions of each of the plans which were considered in the analysis of the bid proposals. I feel that with a Loss Participating Pl8n, there is a monetary incentive (in addition to the other advantages) to institute and maintain a good safety program to control losses. In the Flat Divi- dend Plan, no matter what loss experience the City has--good or bad--the premium is fixed. On the other hand, if our loss experience does turn out to be quite bad,the City's chances for financial loss are limited by the maximum provision premium of the plan ($2,663 over a Flat Premium Plan). As noted in Mr. Doiglas' report, bids of McNamera Insurance Company and P. M. Endsley Company are identical. I understand that one of the partners in the P. M. Endsley firm is a Mr. Dale Hadrath, who is a resident of Fridley. On that basis, I would recommend the Council award the Workmen's Compensation bid to the P. M. Endsley Agency. GRD/ms Enclosures Very respectfully, n C� k. u�«�� erald R. Davis City Manager �� I' � � I' - k.._� .- 4 -.� . ��►� A C H M A N-- � cabc� ,�a,«�: Twins �� NDERSON, Inc. INSURANCE • FINANCIAL PLANNING PIONEER BUILDING - ST. PAUL. MlNN. 55101 - 612-227-8483, Leland C. Douelas Vice•Pee�idenc Mr. Gerald Davis, City Mgr. Ci ty of Fri dley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota Dear Mr. Davis: December 2, 1971 The following resume outlines the reasons for my conclusions in the suggestion of the type of plan best suited for the City of Fridley. You have been furnished a brief outline of the Three Plans - Flat Dividend, I.oss Participating Divi.dend and Retrospective Rating Plans. In the past you have been on loss participating dividend plans (with dividends paid i� 1968 and 196g) and a flat dividend plan in 1971. My selection would be a one year Loss Participation Dividend Plan for the year of )972 based upon the following facts. - _. • The Loss History Year 1965 - 1966 1967 1 g68 1g69 1970 1971 Loss ratio 26% 73% 25% 59% 23% 101% 60-70% est. Basically, the losses have been betow average except for the past two years, which has shovrn an adverse tendency. I k�ow of no reason for this occurring and don't believe it should continu�. I believe it will fall between 40-55°0. ' AfflUate:l�il��.merlcan Insurance Marketing Corporation Branch Ch�rlrston, �VV F:u¢o, \D Jackxon, \tS Los An�cl��s, CA \huk�•�on, \II Xer• 1'nrk, XY PorN:md, OR Sa1t GAke Cih•, L'T tOfRces in Chica�o, IL Hnrrisbiu�, PA I�:�nsns City, \t0 Loui.villc, RY \nshna. \H Oakl:inct. CA Reno, VV S�nttlr, lVp ' . Auburn, h1E Cinrinnnti, Q}j H��iEord, C"[' (.nnder, WY Minmi, FL Nashville, T�T Oklahom�� City, OK Richmond, �'A Tamr,, FL B:�Itimac, \[D Clcvcl,ind, OH Houston. TX Lincoln, NB `tihvsukee. WI Newnrk, KJ Phomix, AZ Re��a, 1L Torv�nto, �a �ambridge, \fA D.•cntur, GA Huntsville, AL Little Rock, AR �[uncie, I�i New Orleans, LA Pittsfiurgh, PA . 5L Louis, �TO W&shinCton, D. C. ' i 1 Mr. Gerald Davis � , � i ' i , � i ' � I , - 2 - December 2, i971 w � � : � .-_.f_ _ • . 5 Loss Control Pro�ram . You have indicated a strong desire for a sound loss control program which has not existed in the past. In my opinion, this will reduce the number of losses (the severity. however, will always be unpredictable) and should produce more desirable results on a dividend pian geared to loss ratio rather than a flat dividend. Until there is evidence of the fact that a loss controi program is effective ( don't believe a retrospective plan should be considered because of the potential penalty in doing so. The net difference in final cost between the "flat dividend" and "loss participating" plan is not great and is a "middle of the road" approach that could result in a lower cost with the Loss Participation dividend. . The apparent low bidder on the basis of my conclusions would be either the Mc Namera Insurance Agency or P.M. Endsley, both of whom quoted the U.S.F.� G. Insurance Co. plan. - You might wish to ask the council to consider waiving bids at the City's op:�on, one year from now for this insurance. The reason for this sugges- tion is that if the engineering and loss control program is working well it might not be advisable to change carriers. Very truly yours, ,� � Leland C. D 1as, l�ice President ' BACHh1AN�ANDERSOtd, I NC. LCD:b � ' I ' I ' • �'r--� � ,- ' • i ' 1 � CITY OF FRIDLEY WORKMENS COMPENSATION PLANS Qefinitions Flat Dividend Plans Under this type of pian the "size of premium" discount is guaranteed plus an estimated dividend (Note - by law dividends can not be guaranteed but realistically they are paid) Advantages - Disadvantages - • _ ,•• � This type of plan produces a known result hence you can accurately budget for net cost. Favorable loss results does not affect the cost. l,ower net costs can be obtained under other plans. � ' �, Particiaatina Loss Dividend Plans U�der this type of plan dividends are determined by the loss ratio and vary. � Advantages - Disadvantages - " Lower loss ratios will produce lower net costs than will the flat dividend plan. Adverse loss ratios will result in no dividend and hence on increased cost, but no greater than the gross premium less the size of premium discount. � Retrospective Plans - One � Three Years Under these pians the insurance company retains a predetermined "basic" , or "retention" premium. To this figure is added the paid (or reserved) losses and State tax. ,' This is a"cost-plus" type plan with a maximum limit that can be paid. Advantage - At lower cost ratio levels this will result in i� lower net costs than either the "flat dividend" or "participating" toss pians. ' Disadvantages - Conversely,�auverse loss ratios will resutt in a greater premium than either the "flat dividend" ' . . i or participating" plans. I ' I ' . � ' , ' - 2 - A three year plan results in a lower net retention by the insurance company � 1 however, it must be kept in mind that all losses for the 3 years go into the fin�l comp'�tation. You may enjoy 2 favorable years (that would have returned prsmium under 1 year plans) only to have one year losses result in no return for the 3 full years. ' � , �omparative Examples ' ' Flat D+vi dend , � participating 1 Year Retro 3 Year Retro (Ave. 1 Year) ' . � � � . ,: .,. '� � , � jf � , ' a G i n i mum $20,414. 17,857• 15,527• 4,634. � . � � 4 At 40% loss rates Maximum $20 ,414. $20 ,414. 18,949. �3.a77. 19,784. 26,633. 18,754. 26,63�. I ' I , ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDI,EY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHA�'VGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS r �l ��Ua. \ �1 " � The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION l, Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30, Block 13, Hamilton's Additian to Mechanicsville, lying in the South Half of Section 23, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District knowa as C-2 (general business areas). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change �� the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from R-3 (general multiple family � , dwellings) to C-2 (general business �reas. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1971. MAYER - Jack 0. Kirkham ATTEST: � CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell i, Public Hearing:November 8, 1971 First Reading:November IS. �9j1 I , Second Reading: ' Publish: ' ; 1��. � ' � � J I ClT �' i�Tay Dar Land Corp . Wayne Peterson, Pres. ZOA ��71-07: L. 23-30, B1. 13, Hamilton's Add. to Mechanicsville Rezone from IRt-3 to R-2 �?) U% .� �� _, :: CENTf� SE�2 � � 57 TH. - AVE:- -- - N.E. _ u ,s r..•,�,. � � � - � . , . ... � � �1 ,. . , .� , ;- ; � _ ,�� ; °- : ; _ . �. �: � :4 � .� 'l. . � - . ,, _.. _. _..- t - . , . 19 ' � Z -./ao 1� . ♦ - � _-_ -�_ ? . ;9. ' . � . ° ' � _. <P 3 _ . . _- - . • __ - _ � �__� _ . ---- _ __ 1� i ze ' • ' IB , _ ; Z - e " 1� ,p , p> ,I � i : I � i...-_. ..3_. .. �� - -... -._- � .. � , Z. s 24 S : : F : . � �� 7I f '__ _ ._ _ - ._. _._ .. _ .. _ . . h _-__ -..._ ... "r ' ! 2,\ I tJ L ' ZJ 6 � ' :. . - . . I • `� ..._.. -__ _ -'S ...� � .� . � - ,... _'" - 4' l - _ � I -- r-- d_ -_ 13 �� 6 Ii y P / .� �� .� 9 . 71 . 9 11 9 __ f (S:wi : I �-� - .` . .. ._ 1 � -- � , :i - iG Ii .o , '� '�y �. � ' /� _ -_��_ �_—_ __._ . . _ '� 1� .: . � I // Ic lyndo% Te m.no/ Co. �_— - � •, j' I _ { � ,t : 9 � ' � . ,y . ,Z ' . P : -- AUD. SUB . N 0. 155 ,'' ; � `, _ � -e_ N - �-- ;__ • v�i _=,e -. " ' '' � 11v: ,� ` - - /Jr � i s. ,F ._' ��_ .ucJ-. I : � " �-- � :�`�'�`"56TH, AYE.�, N•E. , ,� „ `r�., ':� - ,.. .. , � , \ r X '` �. .a , ` ' : < i , �_ : . Z' _ 19` .1 � � . `� ` , � i • i �- � -' _ . \`- y ' ` 2� � .�. / , . " . . .. - � 1�: 1 3 . �:r —� __ i " , / / . . . - _ _v "_ ' "_ Z7 �+ _ ..I � _ __ � . _ e � �� -- - ��- - . ...i � P6 . � J`�� •� .! �// . � / I . � - .- -- - -'--�, ,` f . .r<° /-'t,'�. -}-� I - - - z� � � �� n : ,. ,. � .. � � #i?,r.--- y�, -�� Q� ' _.� � : --.------�. _ - _ � �� , A��. - Y --- -:•- �-- � -r � y/ � � � �..�, %" �et;�•n sf�y� ' '� - S v „ � 4 �- � a 5. - '_'" ' y _ Ii .'� '� �' . . - _ ' __ . . . . . _ ' ... - ` - . � _ ..._- ___ _'_ _ � ' '�— • v �. ' � � -�"_ . . . ' _ "__ ' . 4. a..si _-_'7_s^'__'_"__—'_ �T _' _.- �[ _ _'' -- —_ - � _ r : : _. _ ' ' w � ' ' _ ' _ . �_"`�'.'- �-� - - - . .. " ' � ' . _� - ----- - - . _.. _ �-- - -�------ � " . • ,.. .. .__. .__ _ . _. ._.� _ , . . -- "_'--- "---� " --�3s- -- � —�-'°--��- - -- iro � ... . _ . . . . . '�----J-- -- � _i. � A-� - - - '�_ - - _ � ---_- - -- � � b ' ' HIGHWAY f► i r-= , .. __ . �d _. ,.e. ,: i O -_ � ` _ � ; ` .: CL /1r• �•�~1 , ..,.. . . . . . ..�! . - '_- 1•_ I -�j - .. Y - _ 3 i } y ><IL+- . l .. � K' � - e ./:.�� , 4 V i S i�I�`� f.. :Y S � �� ; .1uI. . � 1� 1 . :9 . .__« �I.� . � . y.. � ��..��' . d.. / _ �� 1• e , �� i�i.. n .r�J.• �� r ;. ": �. .. _ .. ` . � .i-. . . :. ' ' I _$ �. a 41 f� : /., � � , �'"`- - �, y , Z z� �1 0 ._`9 j 3_ ``' •�9 4 Y � � 3 �" - " --� � . _�1! 3 1/ � 'S T , i f „i L � �. , » � ir.� - - - � - - � � � - - . `, �+ � .'7 ' a . + s'.. 'l�� . y. ,. • . .. _ - _ s 1 i . -Y' � �,` 3 ` a � .l ' � Q -- --- , .- . . -- - r� F ?> � " Zr � i ... r • , � .' �e '.• ' S . . . . I �.� � . � I . : _.. .� y . , �Q �yt��` r i. ..� ' = ..'J * `` - O , -. _ . . -� - - - - � :e zi � �e i � i , .- :: ; ,, ,.j, ' . ' d ; Q : - _ E " I _ . • V�. � u .. . � '._.' j7 3 .�_ � . t _ ♦ '�. ' �+ ° - . . . _ i . .- � - -- y :t 9, 1 � �Z 7� , e. �.:. ,. . . � � . . i ... . , , � . ....i .~. ' !?✓t . -- � Zi /e Z• 2i c _ p�!'�' � " Y� - �., � � - . �: "__ � � •�.; ' 1� � � �-` f 1 n.. .�. / . 1 .�� 1. � �'� -V ° �r"�r _ , � OK �. � �. - � - _ . - .y � _ ..• _ /1 �� '� . '� .� � K �' _ .f�"� ?• F'�°.��6. `� ' ! - -- ' -"-- Q -� „ ,� � ,j_ i _.'--- '4 ? � ' - ' O . `�� r . �! i7 K % ` N. .. � r �. i �,"�, �.` ��'fi�� _ :�� I � _ _�: ' iC. .. /f.. . �r. _ ^s Y .- . l :• �� '� �� • ;_ ,'r.�� . {� %- �� •rr �j 's � } ,54TH. AVE. - � �N•E. � � �, - . _ F- - . - .. ,. �- :°" . - , - . �1_ , > ' �� '1 . ., - _ : ., „ . � � �•• S •�✓�. ' � ; . r.. � t �� 1 �' a i•� _ ; ..� ` 3 � �� .. _• ��(y'� [ ' '.��` ..��, •� " '� � a. R 1 , y i Is � � I t � ^ -'• i i_ zv �� Y ''. �� . y• 'f a'� s � . -' �--pB t � .d r � IB I i t' y _ ' , • W � _ _ : r z, J � 1�Z , ~ + '•: "� I � "� f `' . : , ' 1 s• ' ' rM°" i � � � _c � � f .. 1: . ' t `ti � ' � ,. : , " _ . :. ' " �, - ', „ : r,, • j ' . ` — _ _" � ., f Z � � �: :: � r�i ;" . �'-e. � ;�. � .c ' Z � r 1 , I . �.` i _ ` ( . � q' ... '_ ... ` ' 1 .. �' r .:': • . � ' � � � ` • 1 ,I I� {/y�� a ' �. ' 3:• � ° . � r1 - � � � P�' � - `• ' . `' I .. �F _ �! �� _ �. : _'r '�� .• ` � I:'` Q - 19� d 1+ � A .. y i , ' �D�,p..... ; �N, , - �� : :: 9 r ' ^ � ' � < .rr ` IJ1 rz 9. jt io ° � � . ` -� •� 3. � t .� . . . ;�.a �"' ai ,c L ia 1 �, : • '. . , �� +' � ;�yN- ,, , : ., ' : � , I � ^ � - � � � �ri. t�^' .i Q � Q ' - �� // 70 � �'} rA[i`• t,� ' •w!:! (� �ta•:� � �� ;__. -1i_ _.�/ - __ i9 I -� �V " `� + �/ /� �'� O ` . J2 � It. N ,3 ,� /3 /1 /i �l ' � .:i•�- _ '' -: .[�1 �, N F � t� . � •''"��ti I '; ,' ... /j , ro ,r �, ,y 'B -; -, ZV� "�J `�� „ .,.::: •� _ _.� „ • -� ' �� f •� '..y a �� . .�• Q �. �. , . i4 �� ~ i. s� , 0 0 . �e��. Vl �i\ � �:_ Nvvectt�r 2G�, 1971 � r Mr. �7�rrea dahusr�a . Dist�icC Rc:prescntative � Nvrthexzt S�.�tes ��:er Co�z�an:y 4501 £��eh .Av�.��a� I�nrth l�tinne�g�lis, i�iianesa�a Sub,�ect: Re2a�aLio� oi th� !iS K(t I,in� �Jfthict th:� City of Fridley D�ar tfix. Johnsoa: T�i� can�ir�� c�yr te:e�E��a� convvrs�tiara on this cl�te c�nvernin�; you� a�p��n�� mL tf�e G�uncit M�:eting o� D�cec�b�r b, �R7i, at 7:3FJ Y.ri., i,n the Civic C�:rt�er, 64�1 Ur�ivar�ity t�venue N. E. �I� � are h�FP� t€a�t �ar. ��.ect Col��, 1��:�n, ;�z�, xrar�s�isai.c�n arzci C�:aatruc4 tioct Ilepart�r:rt� c�f �:SI', �i�I �� bl� ta 1ain �ou th,� evtinin�, t� �ns�%�r Ch:: Caunc�?'s qu�:sCions. IC is �y �r�d�rst<�n�ifcz�;, fzocj yau, th�C i;SP h.�s r�cErive�i �e�-6�� apgzava2 frow �urllnVt�n :;p�tlzes�n �aiLro�3 tr., energizL lint.:s, p::nttir�� o�: t�c��c�I, s��c3.�:icatt�zt:� to be t.��ie;� ;:ut. I a� surr� t��+.� Council �i.12 ba ��st �:r�;a�us t�� h�:�r u� L;��.s=z r��v4l.un�;�Ln�s, ��zd �rC�.cui�rly �u es�iTMt�te of tf:�� tic� sclz,.��:tt reunr�{.r,� �.cc�;�a�li�h.�rtt af C�ca3, reiacati��n �f �I.I. lir�s �nc3 e:tnr��.zi�3u 4f sc��, p�r your �grw�;cr,ent, �fCh the City �f xri:ile>y. I�;ouic3 �e in�.er��st�;� i� receivis:� a�clpy of ��lE «I�.��t?C! a; �.r�;=�a?. yoc: e?II��k.1.Dr1�F.'. rt~�t?1�VT1.«�s� �iGiA �'iL:Y�iil��ti5i1 i�10�'t�TE?iSl �i<%f i�f-4C{ T'::��'t..�Ci�:3"�, �.:1�_ :.f�..'Cl.ti��+ST t�J a?'� lOa iaa�z'� �;7 �'II?i��2t �il:'. sy�t�m e:l�wn s�a:.�4 �,:pw.�a�,a' is _�:ceiv�:3 �;� �';��. ��'l3Li{: �:%i.i �+a jY�:Li:,' CO:?jtCsr..iL�QL3 v:I t.�?�., F:?<:iwLE!'' c^T2C,a. .:r? &tl+ZT1 �'7�' loo:cin�, £or.7ur� t� st�einv you vn;1 iFr. C�.�:e��K,� nn �ec�:�t�z 6th �t r€�ca Cou nc i 2:-�e L t i:3;; . $�a1Ct��!�;i y:3+wZS? '.r6.'`'�: �<p: � 4 i.=., ;i..' .: b 3�.a LJ .�. ��Y i�1..�'. ii:J! �y C', 4 F..�1LiJ f .r'-i.�`;i . rn� r+;,-., t�.-...a.-.�,,,,. 0 �L�ih . � 1� :� � I _ � �� 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF FRIDLEY NOVEMBER 17, 1971 1� PAGE 1 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Erickson at 8:01 P.M. ROLL CALL: ' Members Present: Minish, Zeglen, Erickson, Schmedeke, Fitzpatrick Members Absent: None Others Present: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Engineer and Planning Director, � Peter J. Herlofslc�, Planning Assistant, Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant. APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: NQVEMBER 3, 1971 '� MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Zeglen, that the minutes of the Planning Comrnission meeting of November 3, 1971 be approved. Upon a voice vote, a11 ' , votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: NOVEMBER 4, 1971 MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the BuiZding Standards-Desiqn Control Subcommittee meeting o.f November 4, 197Z. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ORDER OF AGENDA: The Chairman said there would be an addition to the Agenda setting a public hearing date of December 8, 1971 for the Special Use Permit, SP ��71-16, by Everett Utter. MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Zeglen, to confirm the addition of the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #71-16, by Everett Utter settinq a public hearing for December 8, 1971. Upon a voice vofe, aI1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA 4�71-10, BY MRS. LLOYD MURPHY: To rezone the Westerly half of Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition from C-1S to C-2 (general business areas) for a small golf putting course. The Public Hearing Notice was read by Chairman Erickson. Inasmuch as the petitioner was.not present, the Chairman entertained a motion to hear the petition later should the petitioner come in. ' MOTIDN by Fztzpatrick, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Corrunission I� continue the Public Hearing of the Rezoning Request, ZOA #7Z-10, by Mrs. L.loyd Murphy for later in the aqenda. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the rrrot.ion carried unanimously. I � � , �� . � fi� �� \1, � 1�G► Planning Commission Meeting - November 17, 1971 Page 2 � 2. VAGATION REQUEST• SAV 4�71-07, BY MRS. VIRGINIA T. JACOBSEN: To vacate the East-West alley in Block 3, Spring Brook Park Addition. Mrs. Virginia Jacobsen was present. The Chairman explained that this item was continued from the last meeting in order to notify the people in the neighborhood. Mr. Clark said he had not received any phone calls. The only lot that abuts the alley for which no signature was given was Lot 28. Mrs. Jacobsen said the Schultz's assured her that they can get that signature if she needed it. No one is using the alley. Chairman Erickson said the City would have to retain the easements for utilities� Mr. Clark explained that the Board of Appeals were asked for a variance for the construction of a garage to the lot �ine, and to vacate the alley if no one was using it. The City has indicated that they are doing everything to discourage the use of an alley. Mr. Schmedeke said he recalled that in his area, one person objected to the vacation of an alley and the petition was not granted. He wished an attempt could be made to create an ordinance where 80% or so would be adequate to pass. Chairman Erickson said that he agreed it would be desirable to vacate the alley, or try to do it. In this particular case, he found that at leasfi 80°6 of the people who own property adjacent to the alley have petitioned for the vacation. Mr. Clark said, referring to notices mailed to the people, that in the City � Charter, only the people affected are notified, for example, an alley vacation reQuires only the people in the block to be notified, and if a street, they would perhaps go two or three blocks. � Mr. Fitzpatrick said that in view of the recommendation of the Subcommittee, in view of the fact that no one has objected, and in view of the large number of people requesting the vacation, he would make the following tnotion. ' �J MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approval of the vacation request, SAV #71-07, by Mrs. Virginia T. Jacobsen to vacate the East/West 12 foot a11ey in Block 3, Spring Brook ,Park Addition with the stipulation that the City retain the utility easements and that the utility companies concur. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carri ed unaniinousl y . � 3. CONTINUED• REZONING REQUEST, ZOA 4�71-09, BY CASTLE MOBILE HOMES, INC.: To rezone the Westerly 600 feet of the Northerly 750 feet of the NF}� of the Nt�P� , of Section 12 to be rezoned from M-1 (light industrial areas) to C-2S (general shopping areas). � 3 ' �_� � ' � ' r � � CJ ' � � , ., , ` 13 Planning Commi.ssion Meeting - November 17, 1971 Page 3 4. CONTINUED• REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP 4�71-14, CASTLE MOBZLE HOM�S, INC.: P�r Section 45.101 - 3N of the Fridley City Cod� fox the locativn of Mobile Home sales on the Westerly 600 feet of the Southexly 320 �ee� o� the Northerly 750 feet of the NE� of the NW1�, Section 12. Mr. Rotter and Mr. Swanson were present. The public hearings were closed at the November 3rd meeting. The Commission asked for some comments relating to the proposed comprehensive plan outline to be presented this evening. Mr. Qureshi distributed to the Planning Cotnmission the rough draft of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Qureshi said that what had been done was basically a collection of a variety of material put together for the Planning Commission to review, change and modify. Maps were shown with overlays, superimposing the surrounding communities to get a little better view of the areas pertaining to this request. The thinking of the area for the rezoning request was chiefly commercial - Viking Chevrolet and Frostop are also commercial types of business. Highway ��65 carries 30,000 vehicles and Osborne Road 8,000. With almost 40,000 vehicles going past this section, quite a commercial exposure is created. It is probable this area can be used for a good commercial development, but it should be more of a regional `` type rather than neighborhood. It was felt there is enough local neighborhood type commercial scattered all over the City now. Viking Chevrolet would be con- sidered commercia� with a Special Use Permit. If the Council and Planning �om- mission consider rezoning, there should be thought given to detaching the a�rviGe drive now in front of Frostop. Mr. Schmedeke said the reason he wanted to study this request furthex' was because he objected to the fact that the mobile home sales do not pay the a�me taxes as other businesses. This firm has operated three year� in Frid�e� now. He did not believe they were taxed by the assessor or that they paid a license or permit fee to the City. As he understands it, they do pay a license £ee to the State and the State returns 30% to the City. He understood that this camin$ qear mobile homes are going to be taxed as personal property. He did no� knqw how this would affect the City. If these people are going to put in anoth�r '; mabile home sales and not put a foundation under the trailer they use as an office, he saw no reason why other businesses could not opexate from a mGb�le home. Alse, there could be the possibility this is not what we want on tJnis corner. Mr. Zeglen asked if Mr. Schmedeke was saying he was not interested 1A �RObi�.e , sales as such, or was he objecting because the business did not have a pe�rut�nent foundation. Mr. Schmedeke felt something permanent should be constructed on a valuable site. f_J , ' �� Mr. Zeglen said the situation is that we have a mobile home sales moving out and another business taking over the property it occupied. Now the questian is whether we continue on the basis of a trailer home for the home offic� or something more permanent. Perhaps for the period of three years, and a�t�et thxee years go to a pex�manent home office or fliscontinue. The Mobile Home Sa�.�a busi- ness was probably mueh smaller when they first began their business in �ridley, pe�haps half . . �. . 0 � Planning Commission Meeting - Novemher 17, 1971 Page 4 Mr. Minish said that he agreed with Mr. Schmedeke. When they first came in and applied for a Special Use Permit, he did not feel this request was the best utilization of the permanent structure. He was reluctant to rezone bec�us� for one reason or another, the petitioner was not able to produce a specifiG ��e. He would rather wait and have a particular type of use presented. He Wou1d be opposed to rezoning at this time. Chairman Erickson said that he had spent some time researching. Two years ago the Council granted a Special Use Permit to Castle Mobile Homes, Inc. to operate a trailer sales office subject to the Subcommittee's recommendations at the present location of the company on the lot South of 72nd Avenue. The recom- mendations were violated, practically every one. The entrance blacktop was not done. Vehicles were to be 15 feet apart -- they are about 5 feet apart. They were supposed to supply adequate security lighting. Public rest rooms were to be supplied, but he could not find the rest rooms agreed to. Violated parts of the Sign Ordinance with a flashing sign and use of pennants. Mr. Minish said that this confirmed his suspicions. Mr. Bernard Rotter of Castle Mobile Homes asked to be heard on his awn behalf. He said that the outside rest rooms were not required. They have two rest rooms inside the sales trailer. He was not aware of the pennant ordinance. The flashing sign was the only one he knew of that was in violation. Their agreement was that they were to blacktop or hard surface. When they talksd to the Council, they were told they could use Class V with a prime coat of oi1. Chairman Erickson said he had the minutes before him and Council requested there be 15 feet between the trailers. Chairman Erickson said he thought every agreement that was made at the time of the Special Use Permit was violated. Mr. Rotter said the sign was cut down because of the City Ordinance. Mr. Schmedeke asked Mr. Rotter if his company had any connections with the Castle Mobile Sales on the other side of Anoka. Mz. Rotter answered that they started first here in Fridley and did ve�Cy well, and then they opened two more offices. As far as violations were cancerned, the sign was the only thing he was aware of, but nothing else was brought Co their attention. Mr. Fitzpatrick said that this isn't the first time the Commission found. , differences between the plans on file in City Hall and actual field conditions. It appears that some of the requirements on plans are eithez changed or missed. � Mr. Rotter said the first approval was directly from the Council. He thought, if they were in violation, they should have been told at that time, He said they are b�ing taxed as real estate now. Mr. Reynold Swanson said they � pay $25.00 for a permit to keep the trailer on the lot plus real estate taxes of $450.00 to the State. � Chairma� Erickson said according to the minutes of the Baard of Appe��$ meeting of July 2, 1969, Mr. Rotter stated he would blacktop. � � i , , � �s Planning Commission Meeting - November 17,1971 Page 5 Mr. Rotter said they put in Class V and oiled it and it is a hard surf�ce. The Building Ins.pector should have told them and they would have complied. Mr. Clark said the comments on the sign were correct. Chairman Erickspn said that if there was another agreement, the Commission did not know about it. Mr. Rotter said they were now rezoning the entire piece of property. They would be paying taxes on the whole until they found a buyer. They were request- ing the Special Use Permit for the property they would occupy. They would have to come in with plans or piatting before any construction can be started. He did not believe a permanent building on the property would be the best thing for the City to have. They did not feel the rezoning and special use permit was an unreasonable request. Mr. Qureshi said C-2S is what they would call general business zoning, while C-1 is local business. This is a sizeable amount of property, and there is enough land to build something substantial. Mr. Zeglen said that this was land rezoned by M. G. Astleford from cotmner- cial to industrial and he did n�°Ei�ow many years the Iand has been lying idle since the rezoning. He felt the'�and would develop faster if commercial. I Mr. Schmedeke said the land probably will be commercial some day, but it ' should not be at this date with a temporary building. Maybe at a future date, I if a proper commercial business comes into that area, we may want it in. Mr. Qureshi said that the type of business that they are proposing, with a Special Use Permit, would give double control -- rezoning first and Special Use Permit second. Mr. Zeglen noted that 69th Avenue North and Osborne Road the develop�ent is commercial. He couldn't see anyone wanting to go in with light industrisl, Mr. Minish said that the other side of the street developed light industrial. He was not sure this side of the street would not. i' Chairman Erickson said he tended to agree with Mr. Minish as far as khe possibility of going commercial zoning without knowing what is going in theXe. The Commission might put themselves in the position of pex'mitting access clase I to Highway No. 65 and create a traffic problem. They might be wiser holdin� ' back until such tim��the corner wants to go commercial so that we can get Che access away from H3ghway No. 65 and Osborne Road, otherwise the Commissio� Gould force themselves into a positio� where they would have to give access. �. ' Mr. Zeglen felt if you have the area zoned commercial, a�d when somebpdy comes in and wants to buy, a decision will not have to be made o� zoning to commercial. The land is ready to go. Mr. Qureshi added that about five years ago, Mr. Astleford put in sewer and water, hoping to move the property, but cou�d not. Mr. Rother asked that, if in the event the rezoning is not approved, and the land remains light industrial then, as an owner, would thsy be able to sell to ,anyone they wished subject to a plat? , ' ' , � _ �� Planning Commission Meetinpz - November 17 � 1971 Page 6� I NOTION by ZegZen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, in view of �he changes in zoninq and traffic along Highway No. 65, the Planning Co�nission recommends agprcaval of the rezoning request, ZOA $71-09, by Castle Mobile Xomes, Ir�c. of the We,��er1y 600 feet of the Northerly 750 feet of the NE� of the N[,�� of Section 12, ta be rezoned from M-1 (light industrial areas) to C-2S (qeneral shopping ar��)- Upon a voice vote, Zeglen, Fitzpatrick voting aye and Minish, �rickson, ,Sahmedeke voting nay, the MOTION FAILED. MOTION by Minish, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Commi��icar� recom- mend denial to the City Council of the rezoninq request, ZOA �17.�-09, by Castle Mobile Komes, Inc. of the Westerly 6001 feet oi` the Northerly 750 feet o�' khe NF� o� the NWx� pf Section 12 to be rezoned from M-1 (liqht zndustrial axsas) to C-2S (generaZ shopping areas). Upon a voice vote, Minish, Schmedeke, .�z'iCkson voting aye and Fitzpatrick, Zeglen voting nay, the motion ca,r.ried. ' At this point, in light of the vote on the rezoning request Mr. Mini�h said, ' the Special Use Permit is a moot question. If Council does not agree with the denial of the rezoning by the Planning Commission, the Special Use Permit &hould be referred baGk to the Planning Commission for recommendation. ITEM 1(CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1): PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA �71-10, MRS. LLOYD MiJRPHY: The Westerly Half of Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition to rezone from C-1S to C-2 (general business areas) for a�ma11 putting course. �_ Chairman Erickson said, that because of a conflict of interest, he wou�d not vote on this ftem. The petitioner had not appea'red. MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Schmedeke, that the P1ann�ng Commission Gab1e until the December 8, 1971 meeting the rezoning request, ZOA #7I-10, by M�cs. L1oyd Murphy to rezone the Westerly Ha1f of Lot 18, BZock �, Spring Va11ey Addition from C-1S to C-2 (qeneral business areas) for a sma11 g41f putt.ing course. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimous,l�. 5. CONFIRM PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF DECEMBER 8, 1971: Req,uest for a Sp��i$1 Use Permit, SP 4�71-15, by Curt R. Swarison for a parkin$ lat an pa�rt p�' Lots 18 and 19, Auditor's Subdivision 41129. MOTION by Minish, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commissipn confirm the public hearing date of December S, 1971 for the request of a Special Use Permit, SP #7I-15, by Curtis R. Swanson for a parking la� on part QP LoGs 18 and 19, Auditor's Subdivision #I29. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting ayQ, t,�ie motion carried unanimously. 6. CONFIRM Pij$LIC HEARING bATE OF DECEMBER 8, 1971: Requ�sC for a Special. Use Permit, SP ��7�-16, Everett F. Utter for a second aCcessory stort�g� building on Lot 6, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills Addition. � MOTION by Mznish, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the P�a73ni�ag Comm.��.�p11 con- firm the public hearing date of Decembei• $, 1971 for the xequest of 8 SpeC��.1 Use Permit, SP #7I-16, by Everett F. Utter for a second accessory storage bu�ld�ng ' on Lot 6, 81ock 2, N1oor� Lake Hi11s Addition. Upon a vo.�ce vote, a11 vQ�inq ;, aye, the motion ca,�ried unanimously. � � Plannin� Commission Meeting - November 17, 1971 Page 7 7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY: , Referring to the booklets distributed earlier in the meeting, Mr. QuXe�hi noted that certain areas are outlined where he felt he would like the Planning Commission to give a closer look. ' � � � _J � � � � ' � � � ' ' 1� Chairman Erickson asked if, when their review was comple�e, w�uld the compresensive plan be similar to the one presented tonight. Mr. Qureshi answered "yes", the layout would be basically the same, but the content would be dep��dent on the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Mr. Qureshi continued in order to make application for Federal or State �d they require a comprehensive plan. This is not a rezoning map, merely a guide. A petitioner would still have to come before the Planning Commission and Council to rezone. We want the Planning Commission to make ch�nges in the presented p1�n - later we will have detailed plans. This is overall. Then if you have time, we would work with you and take area by area and make � closex- study. When the Planning Commission has completed the study, they can recommend to Council and Council can adopt by simple resolutionm If th� ��n� Cotnmi�sion wished to hold a public hearing before presentin� their recotmnendation to Cou�cil, they can do so. When Council receives the recommendation, if they adopt it without changes another public hearing is not necessary, bu� if there are chari$�s, Council will hold a public hearing. The study will become a guiding tool fvz both the Planning Commission and the Council. It must be unde�stood by tha citizens that this is in no way a zoning map. He felt three or four m�nths would be a realistic time for the completion of the study. Mr. Qureshi then went through the Proposed ComprehensiVe Plan sectio� by section stating goals and objectives. Chairman Erickson said the report was very good and the �lannin� �epax�m��t did a great �ob. Mr. Qureshi again stressed zhe point that the City must be careful �hat the citizens will not think the City is adopting a new zonin� plan. Chairman Erickson suggested•that at the first meeting in January the study should begin. Mr. Qureshi said that we are looking for a plan which will be af he�� for the future development of Fridley. Certain areas could be xeviewed fux��e� and some adjustment made. 8. GUIDE LINES FOR LOTS SUBSTANDARD IN SIZE: Mr. Qureshi said that Council has requested recommendatlons regarding the disposition of lots which are substandard in size. A gentleman came befoxe Council and asked what the City is doing about it. If the Planning Commission had sqme time, this is �uite urgent, the Council would appreciate their views. In the Plymquth Addition there are 40 foot vacant lots and many lots are goln$ .. . �� Plannin� Commission Meeting - November 17, 1971 Page 8 ' tax forfeit. The gentleman has an option on some of these 1ots. Most of tbe lots are corner lots. Basically 90� of the lots in Plymouth Addition are 80 feet pr 75 feet with an area of about 10,000 square feet. There are some which are k0 , feet with an area of 5,200 square feet. Council is looking for direction oA what'you feel can be done with these lots. There are 2 cases the rigMt o� Way is not being used. Half of the roadway would give them a lot 68 or 70 fee� wide. Sewer lines are in the streets so the owner could not build on the sewer lines. ' The decisian the Commission has to make is whether or not we should allow tltese lots to be built or let go tax forfeit and be picked up by the City. ' Chairman Erickson said the Commission would figure some way to let the owners build with the kind of house that would fit the lot or have the City pick up the lot and maintain it. The problem with the City maintaining it, they � would forfeit the taxes and specials. The area in the Plymouth Addition is zoned R-l. He asked that copies of the Plymouth Addition showing the position of the tax forfeit lots be mailed to the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT: � There being no further business, Chairman Erickson adjourned the meeting at 10:40 P.M. � C� � ' � L� ' � i i 1 Re�gectful y�bm�ted � '` �/�1.e..�Qirti/ Hazel 'Brian Recording Secretary ' .^ � BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF NOV�MBER 23, 1971 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Zeglen at 8:05 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Zeglen, Lindblad, Tonco MEMBERS ABSENT: Gnerre, White OTHERS PRESENT: Hank Muhich - Chief Building Inspector MOTION by Lindblad to approve the minutes of the November 4, 1971 meeting as written. Seconded by T.�nco, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 7.. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT PROJECT II (258 UNIT) APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED ON THAT PORTION OF THE EAST '� OF THE SOUTHEAST '� OF SECTION 24, LYING NORTH OF INTERSTATE ��694, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY VIEWCON INC., 5901 OSSEO ROAD, BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA). Mr. Mike Wirtanen and Mr. Dan Swedberg were present to prt�sent the request. Mr. Wirtanen said this 258 unit complex would include 138 1-bedroom units, 60 2-bedroom units and 60 studio apartments. Mr. Zeglen asked what the studio apartments were like. Mr. Wirtanen said they have no bedroom, but have a sleeping area. , Mr. Wirtanen said they were trying to save as much vegetation as possible, so they had placed their complex to take full advantage of the terrain and vegetation, the same reason determining the placement of the parking areas. The main entrance would be off North Innsbruck Drive. There would be an ' exit to Arthur Street. There is no restriction that these be used exclus- ively as an entrance or exit. It would depend on where the tenants garage was located. All curbing in the blacktop areas would be concrete. There ' will be underground parking, by contract, and surface parking. There will be 453 parki_ng spaces in all. There will be an outside recreation area with a pool and volleyball and tennis courts. ' Mr. Tonco asked if the parking areas will be lighted. Mr. Swedberg said this was a security system building and Northern States Power Company con- sultants were working on the li,ghting. � , �' � � ' ' Mr. Lindblad asked about the 10' radius on the corners of the entrances. Mr. Wirtanen said there would be a trash chute, centrally located by the elevators. All trash would be compacted. He said this was similar to what they had in the townhouse development. Mr. Tonco questioned if one chute would be sufficient. Mr. Swedberg said they would make a study to determine if more chutes were needed. Mr. Swedberg said this is a slightly shorter building than the townhouse development but there were more units because the units were smaller. Mr. Zeglen said there would be a problem wi.th the density of this project if it was figured by itself. The code allows 172 units per acre and this project has 232 units per acre. But they were being allowed to combine the 68 acr�s of 20 Building Standards-Design ControL Meeting of November 23, 1971 Page 2 the towahouse area and apartment area together. They could have 1196 units on this acreage, but their total units in the combined area will be 850. The exterior of the building will have cedar rough sawn wood siding with a pitched asphalt shingle residential roof. _There would be no gross difference in the appearance of this complex and the one already built. Mr. Zeglen noted that there wasn't any overhang on the building and wondered if they intended to install gutters. He said he knew this wasn�t�a requirement. Mr. Tonco suggested they consider an overhang or gutters because during periods of thawing and freezing the iee and snow could come down on the facing of the building. Mr. Wirtanen said there would be diverters over the doorways and that they would make a study of the coumittee's suggestions. The complex would have recessed balconies with spaced 1"x6" decking. Mr. Tonco suggested they have solid decking with a pitch. The first floor wi11 have all one bedroom apartments. On th: second floor, one wing will have one bedroom apartments and the other wing will have both 2 bedroom apartr�ients and studio apartments. The third floor will be a combination of two bedroom apartments and studio apartments. Every rental unit will have a storage unit. The party walls will have double wall construction for sound proofing and the corridor walls and ceiling Will be sheet rock on channels plus insulation. The units will be carpeted throughout except for the bathrooms, although a final decision has not been made for the kitchen area. Each grouping of apartments has a fire wall and fire door. Mr. Tonco asked about the boiler room. Mr. Wirtanen said it will be centrally located in a completely firepr.00f, all concrete room. Each building will have its own system. Mr. Lindblad asked about air conditioning. Mr. Swedberg said there will be a wall unit in each apartment. Mr. Muhich reminded them they had to have vented hoods in the kitchens, and air change in the halls. Mr. Swedberg said Carl Walker would be doing the structural drawing. Mr. Zeglen asked about handrails on the stairs. Mr. Swedberg said they would be of steel and wood. Mr. Muhich said all easements had to be worked out with the engineering department before any permits were issued. MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval of the request to build a 258 unit apartment complex with the following stipulations noted in red on the plans: 1. Radius of 10' on corners of curbing. 2. Poured concrete curbing on a11 blacktop. 3. Check with N,S.P. for Iighting of parking areas. 4. Give further study for more garbage chutes. ' 21 Buildin� Standards-Design Control MeetinQ of November 23, 197I Pa�e 3 � Seconded by Lindblad. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED ON LOT 23 AND 24, BLOCK 7, ONAWAY ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7735 BEECH STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MZNNESOTA. (REQUEST BY INVENTORS ENGINEERING, INC., 7735 BEECH STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA). Mr. Paul Smith was present to present the request. This request covers two buildings that are being combined into one building. � Mr. Smith said the exterior of the building wi11 be a combination of rough sawn redwood and stucco with a wavy edge cedar mansard roof. There were two dr�ve-in entrances. They want to change the roll-up garage door of one entrance into a street entrance. That existing driveway would be used for a walkway. The roll-up � door would be replaced with a hollow metal frame in concrete and have an insulated glass light door with metal flashing. They will sod the open areas in the front and plant evergreens. Mr. Smith said they wanted to install pre-cast curbing along '� the other existing driveway. Mr. Tonco said he would want them to install poured concrete curbing because pre-cast curbing was easily dislodged when trucks were using the driveway. No type of anchoring seemed to stay in place. Mr. Muteich said the code called for poured concrete curbing. Mr. Smith said they would install ,� poured concrete curbing. He said they made quality automatic machines and they I want their building to reflect this quality. They will be expanding their office space, in the interior, and make some new offices. They have 10 employees with no access to parking on their property. At the present time they are using a neighbor's driveway to get to an undevei- oped parking area on their property. The committee told Mr. Smith they want that area blacktopped. Mr. Smith said he did not want to blacktop that area when he had no guarantee they could continue to gain access to this area through their neighbor's drivepay.� He said he would contact his neighbor to see if he could get an agreement from him. He also wan[ed to talk to him about blacktopping his area adjacent to Mr. Smith's. He thought it would be better to have it all done at the same time. In the rear of the property there is an unimproved dedicated alley. Mr. Muhich told Mr. Smith to talk with the engineering department to see if the grade was established so the parking area could be blacktopped. Mr. Smith said on site parking would be very desirable to them, so if it were possible to gain access in any way he would do it. MQTION by Lindblad to recommend approval of the additzon to the �xisting �, � building with the stipulations: 1. Poured concrete curbinj on existing driveway, i 2. Blacktop t'.�z parkino area as soon as possible. ;� Seconded by Tonco. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. '� � � I'I � Building Standards-Design Control Meeting of November 23, 1971 Page 4 3. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A PROPOSED FOUR STALL GARAGE LOCATED ON LOTS 11, 12, 13 AND 14, BLOCK 3, SPRING BROOK PARK ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 231 79TH WAY N,E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY MRS. VIRGINIA JACOBSEN, 231 79TH WAY N.E „ FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA). Fred E. Rehbein was present to present the request. He is the contractor for the proposed four stall garage. The exterior would be rough sawn cedar with a trussed hip roof to match the existing apartment building. Mrs. Jacobsen has been granted a variance to build on the rear property line. There is a public hearing pending on vacating the south 2 of an alley. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the vacation November 17, 1971. If this vacation is granted, the garage would be 6' from the property line. MOTION by Lindblad to recommend approvai to construct a four stall garage, Seconded by Tonco. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Zeglen at 10;05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � - � -� —_ ) ��7r*f'�'�4�'N � DOROTHY EV SON Secretary � r � � �2 � � THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF NOVEMBER 23, 1971 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Minish at 7:35 P.M. MEr1BERS PRESENT: Minish, Drigans, � MEP�ERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Clarence Belisle, Harju, Sondheimer, Wall Building Inspector � MOTION by Harju to approve the minutes of the October 26, 1971 meeting as written. � Seconded by Sondheimer. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. � � � � � Chairman Minish reported to the Board that the Council had concurred with the Board's recommendations on the October 26, 1971 items. 1. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.134, 6, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK. WHEN AN M-1 PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO A DIFFERENT DISTRICT, FROM 100 FEET TO 70 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONS'TRUCTION OF A WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE BUILDING TO BE ON PART OF LOT 1. PARCEL 300, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION_N0. 89, THE SAME BEING 1305- 72ND AVENUE N E, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA �REQUEST BY BRYANT-FRANKLIN CORPORATION, 1000 WEST COUNTY ROAD D, NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA.) Mr. Richard Brama, President of Bryant-Franklin Corp., was present to present the request. A landscape plan and floor plan were shown to the Board. Mr. Brama explained they are buying the land from Midwest Federal, who is the fee owner of the property. Mr. Brama said when they had the architect draw up the plans they asked him to put the maximum size building on the land that would meet all codes. Because of the R-3 Zoning across the street they found the setbacks on their property more restrictiveo They could meet the front yard setback requirement by turning the building around and facing the warehouse toward 72nd Avenue instead of the offices but they feel the proposed placement is more aesthetically pleasing to the surrounding area. He also discussed this with Midwest Federal, who would be mortgaging the construction, and they feel the proposed placement is also the best arrangement. Mr. Brama said the proposed building�is 352'-Q" long by 220'-0" wide. The front 20 feet of the building will be used as office area with the remaining 100 feet used as warehouse area. The building is designed so that it could all be used for one company or it could be rented out to several small businesses. The building will be partitioned into bays that are 35 feet by 120 feet or could be partitioned to the tenants requirements. The ceiling is 20 feet high so there could be a mezzanine floor if the occupant desired. � The building will be 70 feet from the property line, with another 50 feet to the centerline of 72nd Avenue so they feel it will not be encroaching on anything. � � Mr. Jim Determan of Aeterman i�lelding, 1241-72nd Avenue, adjacent property to the West, stated his building is setback 100 feet from the centerline of 72nd Avenue. His building is a steel building that was built 4 years ago. He mentioned he will be adding onto his building and he will be erecting a security fence in the near future. � � �:" r^ �� ;1 2� The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of November 23, 1971 Page 2 �� Chairman �Iinish asked Mr. Deternian if he had any objections to this variance. Mr. Determan said he did not. Mr. Sondheimer asked what material the building would be constructed of. ' Mr. Brama. answered it would be constructed of decorative concrete block, steel � bar joist, and a concrete floor. Each office would be air conditioned and carpeted, with a bathroom with ceramic tile. The tenants would decide how much soundproofing, security, etc., that they would need. Mt. Belisle asked what type of screening they were planning on using. Mr. Brama said the plans show a 6 foot high chain link fence and they would like to use this fence rather than a wooden one that would need a lot of upkeep. MOTION by Wall to cloae the public hearing. Seconded by Drigans. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. The Board members agreed that this was one instance where the building would enhance the area more by positioning it as proposed, with a variance, rather than turning the building and following the required setback. MOTION by Harju to recom�end to the City Council approval of the variance provided the offices are located on the South side of the building as this adds more aesthetic value to the area tj�an having the loading docks face 72nd Avenue. Seconded by Wall. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. '� 2. A RE UEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.053, 4A, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE I MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 30 FEET TU ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A � FRONT ENTRY ONTO EXISTING DW�LING LOCATED ON LOT 9i BLOCK 4, PARKVTEW OA 1ST ADDITION THE SAME BEING 5516 REGIS DRIVE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST B1' � MR EDWARD W. FUERSTENBERG, 1319 CIRCLE TERRACE, CULUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA.) Mr. Fuerstenberg was pxesent to present the request. A verification survey was, presented to the Board which showed the house set back 36 feet instead of the expected 35 feet. The survey was not available at the time t1�e variance was requested. Therefore, the variance measurements should now read from "36 feet , to 31 feet" instead of from "35 feet to 30 feet". The public hearing notice should also be changed to read "existing foundation" instead of "existing dwelling". � Mr. Fuerstenberg stated the existing foundation was installed 2 years ago by Mr. T. Gnerre. The dwelling was not completed at that time because Mr. Gnerxe could not get a buyer for it. ' �� Mr. Fuerstenberg said he is planning on constructing a split entry dwelling wi1�h a 5 foot by 12 foot entry on the front. There would be a crawl space under th� � entry that would serve as a storm cellar. He wants to add on the entTy for tw� I* reasons; 1. The adjacent house to the North has the identical layout and this .� s �� J The Minutes of the Board of Ap eals Meeting of November 23, 1971 Pa�e 3 � �ould separate them somewhat. 2. Without the entry he would not be able to have the floor plan that he wants ( across the back from south end - master bedroom, kitchen and then family room). � According to the survey, the house to the North has a 32 foot setback and the house to the South has a 37 foot setback. Mr. Fuerstenberg said the second house to the North has only a 30 foot setback. The difference in setbacks is � caused by the land terrain in this area. The houses are on a hill and have no back yards to speak of. � � � � � Mr. Fuerstenber.g said there is no back yard on this property but there is no erosion on the back area as the bank is all sodded. He added he does plan on installing two stone retaining walls, putting fill in between them, and then planting flowers to cut down the drainage off from the back area. Mr. Belisle stated the Inspection Department did require that Mr. Fuerstenberg get a soil test on this property as the existing footing did seem to be heaving and had several cracks in it. Mr. Fuerstenberg did have the report from Ztain City Testing and Chairman Minish read aloud the "Conclusions and Recommendations" of this report. Basically the report said the footings should not heave if the backfill is increased to a minimum 4f 32 feet above the top of the footing elevation and that they are structurally sound to transfer the structural loads to the underlying soils. Also any soft, wet interior fill should be replaced with granular fill. All of the surrounding property owners had signed the variance application � that Mr. Fuerstenberg submitted. Mr9 Fuerstenberg stated he had contacted all of them, informed them of his intentions to build ttie entry, and they had signed the application as they had no objections. MOTION by Drigans to close the public�hearing. Seconded by Harju. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Wall to recommend to the City Council approval of the variance to reduce the front yard setback from 36 feet to 31 feet for the following reasons; 1. To facilitate the use of an existing fotindation to its best advantage. 2. The front yard setback is consistant with the surrounding homes and would not detract from the neighborhood. 3. There were no objections from the surrounding property owners. Seconded by Drigans. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT• The meeting was adjourned by Chairma.n Minish at 8:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � � MARY HIN Secretar �_ � __.��. � ` ` - v .� _ �1 r � ; 1� . 7� �v ..,.; !� � � • 0 v � � �, i �� . <-%s � F,� �� 6� f3 �'3 � V`'3y � m o �� c 3 ¢a � gpaO � � o0 !.7 � � � �� a ° � a � `� e �9� �' � F� Q � �K� '�+ �� R. � � �� tiY �� P+i � � _" �� E� � � �' � � �� t� � � ' � � � �a � � ' �— ,� _, � � ' � � f� `� , �, ._ �; � .� t��4;. � � �a i�9 �' J p� � ,�J v"� 4 e.,......... � °^ re:y YA1 �1, � er � � � <"Q Cw ,� � �� . <` ._.x � , c<: �, ,' 11 ��- � � � � , �� F �� f� �� . �a � ; m � —�°, � � -� � �� ..� � � � � � � �� a� � . � s� r� ; � � � � � � i::'S iH +` 'w � � f,`�� w ' G�w' 2D �� .� C;� . FZ a'�'. r$ a"v : `.� � .� ��. i "� ri f3 I �� j �,1,��' �ry a F+0 i! . ' � �� ; � � V �� e r r� � � �" � i �� a� {� o �I �� ` � � �3 � r. �� .>a F3 fSi a#. � � � 6� I �� i w: r�� Wi � � i � � i � V � :� �� V � �� til G 1 J �� v � , ,` :; ,. ' i�� !i � ( �, � !� � � � i ` " � f � -;� ,! � � � ;+ pJ I U ;' I'i `.' � � 1 ''y� .«;>:,,_ .' '-_.�.-�.�4-..��.�.�.b-...�:.,�f.a � . ` � � �i �M ,� I� ,� � , ^ �� V � �� i ,� I ` I " � I� , . � ;� a � � � 'I M� � C1 � i, .� ;i � � , A v � �1 �� `�l �-"� :� M � � � . ,� �� `� � � ` �,� � � 6 � � � F9 �� p � t� �� e� a„s° y� � � �� C� ¢2 • t� � I 'd ta3 @ � �,a � Q t-i 6'3 ce1 ! R�°. �� t3 b� � c� � `� �i c3 � Fa o-� � ��.1 o R.E a � �? g,° :�e -.� � .,.�n � ' f� � ET C� o� �-s c'� C� .- '� l� •� �'v o F"� : Ci sv i9 . 0:.1 Cs �3 ?'a '. 6' 0 a� � a"i � � �, � . � p �y � � � :� C3 � i� 4� Q� C� ��.�„° .� d.e p. �� C.�° �g� p : �� ' e� tu' .eb d ry`:'7�� i �~' �.'.��? G�. � v � I� i.s � i+�.9 � .ir � 1.+: :� � k �� ; `✓. � � ; \ a r �J .., «� � � M O_ �� C �� i' � � f � �, �f � � �� M � � � c � � � � � -�--��- ! � � � �, �', I '� M � 1 � Q � a , , M � ,` '�°� -�s. -� � � � �� ,� ` � h�� 1 ` � � ti r � � S` � � � � � � �� b+ C� • • w � ..� Bb � � � � ��+ w� � a� � O G'� �i A• s L�`9 i:.`.! Fw 4� �d �' g'� � � 'r�` � �ci � �$ � w � 6'� � �: �:+t • � � � • �Ti � �° v � � e ' "v�a1 °✓� � G� �. E� E•°` e^a 6� �! �v � :� c� � •.� �r�s •� r� : � sa .€s � F-o °«� � � a'.'9i E�i. � � `� ' °� �� OO 'J � d�t 97 � � � CJ ' t� I�s C! (�5 A w�4 C�J 3 c� c5 � c3 Ea+ s� � id (;.? � F..=) � Lt1 C`.� �! rr� a;�• � `-'.� � �� a C � � F�H � W �b2� � � ,; . . .� - . .. ' . . . .. . , . . . . .Y . `. � . . . . . . .. . . .'.;,i ' . � - � � . COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. � ��' � . .4 ' 1448 COUNTY ROAD "J" ` � MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432 � TE L.: 784•9346 CONSULTIIVG ENGII'dEERS , � l�ot amt?�r 3^, I972 � ___-: -' i " , : , �r t�yd;:� c��Y�.�o.R � cIo �,r. �;�.�� ?.��rgi�ger • 412I Stf_r.-�aa} rcu3.�vard 2:�in:��.ya1fU:, -.i�r�:�$oCa S542I - , �� D�ar Sir: 1 Ei� w�re receivgs3 a.�d cr��n�d by the Ci�� f Fri�xey fo� 5anitery Sg�+er ' � �nct *,��at�r Z��r�c�m�:^dt Prfl�act Pdo. �`;�-1 an �»ct•e��ex ],5, 1�71. Th� _ . ; Citp A�ir:�i.t�i4trpti�n tsa� ��k�c: �� ta fe�znfBtz y-ou �Lti ti�r� failc�in� ' infaz��3.or�. , i�, �i:c: lo� bid r�c�i.�=e�i was 25� t�i�hex thnn th� ori��na1. east estirsat�. _ � Tt�tr wou1� i�cr::at�� y�our t�ta1 E.`SC�.S��E.'ti �tsrevsr�.:�nt fro� t�s� grevt.�su�l.y qu�t�:d $7.0,1�2.84 to � rev��ed fi��rc ef $22�3?�{�.f}9. The �ctual ,,� a�se�cr�ent k=i1i �c det�zrair.ed ��► ttae f�n�I ctm°ract cc�sC. �'r�e Ca:�:c�.i �id rot ��.taru e'�e cUritr��t �.:�d ��II. r��.cter �h�� rstC�:r . � . duri.n� the r�gc�l�:c �r�4t3.r.� a� i:3Q p.t�s., L�ce�taar 6, 1971. �c �'ridlep Cit� i�all. � Si�ould ��c�u ki�n to �e 5�ar� r��ardi��; t:�,i.� ��,��.ter, Y�tBJ� fe�l fr�e to attend t1�e r�bave mcsted �eting. � Vcry truly qaur�, Cfi:xSTOCF� � IiA�'IS, YttC. - 1 . Ey , �t�u�. �. l�'.�ric�cr3.fncie P�V/pru;� iec: Fri�lsy City I:z��irceEr 2�ir. Jt��,e� I.airl�ch � i . � � 1 � � �� .i _ ___ . ___ �L.. :1r:y� �� WE_ THE UP3ilERSIGi�;Ell �{�UEST THAT A T�iREE i�IhY STOP BE :CTdSTAI,L ;t� AT THE ? CQt�ATERS Or LYRIC I,AT'oE AI`��J Ii�ISQPd STR�r�T. It,�E Ht�VE `�I1TT•1i�SSED CARS i � . ! TRAU�LTIIG AT �;IiC�SSIVE SPE;�D3 I�t THIS E'��?;A� Ni�1IL�0;,LS H�1V� B�EN RUid � � ; DQ�:TI'; � CHl.LD��PdS LIVr,S t;il�Ai�;G�It:�D BY Cr^1RS I�TOT STOPPING FOi3 SC��OOL � - BUSESs APrD Pi�OPE�R2'Y D:�•�t�GEll AS A R�uULT Ot� CA�S SKIDDII�G 4FT�' THE �O�D. � , �.- - �-r--�Q �,� , -�,.,,� - �� I� � ��'��..� ; D��., f � �n �! ��j /'/r.�4 �j � �O � 7 0�.. � s� J� f� r-f t� �G G-� Lt st I ' `.',,p i// ��-• � // G�J• G{'�/9.�C•C�i'Y%�� oL-c-/'c,c.-c�� t�yz.�a./ � ��'��'/�'YL O �� ,�> � �r �r�'.�� _ ' '�� --.�.�--��-/� -y . � � . / ��LG�� i ✓. "L/� /. � �} �� r �.,_ ! t'_� � �i tv ✓ ��'� - 4 i C; � �� G.., //. � . �. � i� � � � ,.// � � � � . i� � �/ � /� � �'�� L .(.'-�'� �� .�� I . � •� � � � � � -; �% � ,; , 1��/( - �� / �,Z `z.:�- . /��:�.%J � _ y. �� . � �,�. �Y�� . �� .�-�' �«�� , �r�� y.� - ,��;� %�1,��r , ��- � �-f ,� i�-t,.� 1 �� ' � � � % ' �2v�, � �t��-, `�� j ��7�lS _ �--�-6.'---- ��-� 4.-.'-�.. � � j ��h�-- � / � � Z% � � si 7 �ru-c.oS �-n-.� `%�4� � �s�s �'�� '.�,�� :�. �. � -�.�. � ��5 � �� 7�� J� �� /� r/ .%�✓ f ✓ `Cj/!"ZG.</ �Q,�.-(.L `L: �� \ �� , , � '':� � y�.� • . / �� . r f - �: ! � . . __ ... . ..: . . ... . .. ; .. . .� __.., .. eisr avENUE � , . � . 2� � ., _ ! RaFr�c Co�trvrs ( Pec. l,1�71- D�c..2, l9Tl� wYLDWO�� LANE I f . �I y 85 �. D.T. ' , Zoned Residentiol tf� �3 � A. D r . ` . ` #3 �59 �..o.r. . , , ��Se �ALE ' � ROqp IVO-1 ��: P�LlCE �ACCID£NT R�GORDS� F�lLE • . � L79TH AVENUE ` .INOlCATES No Acc�D�Nrs Rr TH�s �. � INTERSECTION . THE2f, Rtico�os DRr� , , . . i � Ba�K ro i955. . : � _ � �: + . . _ � .. — . -- — ---� t w , ,� �_ ( � � QI � ( ( "'I � N (j � �� , ~ �i E-� • Ii �I �I N Zoned Industrial Wi I �i z• i •�� !r � Zoned � Residen�iaf � zf fE � ,( . �; . I c�i I o� �i �I �: -� �' : �f ' � � z '' i , ' ��r^-__'_'��_'_ _"'_' '"'_ ' . ' _' � _'_ '— �-1 _'_�Q '_' __ `_.. "" � -,_. ; �,3�. i�i�,�f'L�^ 1 C O'J'�'T" - - R C ; C •�L/ / 8 ` —•-� _ %/'/2 ' � �KS E E�,/ -f-•� CIT Y IMI �S:':.�.:_:.:::::�:t�:�� ' __ � • �:•� .., g � �J o Ba�.N 31 i CH n_ �� .�.�.� ._ ►. ,�� - z ,, �� • � '' 9 c' / L C� `' ` 3;6� r�.�i:%;;��; Y �IOQ��CRs`�T• L � !;:,'3�'x..�� ,,, 3 3 _7 ELEMENI'�Af��'�`.�. QUT ' O7 �,4. t �'i. - • ,; � ' �I ? � ': ��D�li%��f' � ' L:-J/T�1 jji �� iii ��.�Cii-4��.. .,i � �. � � ^ " ' i_ . �1i��-- �• �� 5 S S '�+,i � ` �NITY .;, - �,,,, (o�sT �ES� � av E � ,.. �� s �, � y � 7 2 ✓�j�� 6 _6_ ! `. �i �� ° ; z` NOSP�TA� � '3 ____—�--- ' '� ' _ s +f: � �� , _ ��u� , . ;�� . � �_ -��, "1 I s 4 I 3 2� Q '� 76 iH. AvE. �� i � V �� ( . r �\�0 9 3 �Jr�39 c0 �;�r��a 3�� ., �4 . ' ' " 1 F � � a 3 = .�: ,s1�5 ��.�"� I '.- •�" /3 2 j �—��lf � f 12 — - a\ � g 3'� i•. r 4 _ It „ F^- F-� z j , i. t � � -. - ' �.� ,\�\,', �� 3 � 1� a�.. i S � j_�2 1 �+w � Z .' � i2 � 3r w� - - R� i \ .-,� \ 7' ;5� � � �1 �� ~ .. , F-E - �. U ` .�, �� , � '_�,3��ii 3�.3�' j- � .' " NE ` �: � ' � o \ �� `_1�� 4�`3.� � i,�_\1;p13 ,`�`'�1.. --��j 'S :� G.0 ,i � � — , � ,�S'J :�\ \,` �z \ i � i � �� -, � l� , � . ' �` . - \'''S .^.�. � \-� y 'S i_ � � 1 � - \ 2" � 2 /, , 7° TM AVE. N.E.- •-�:� � : \�/��-/_\��,\�'`'\ ��`�l � �,/`►.�- 'r '4 ' ? Z� 75 TH��/AVE. 1J � r _ : �--- � - , � _ � ^� ' " ��; `, 5� � � ' � � , ' , i -� �j C F1 F � v ,� � 2 .�.� ,�\i0 .�� ,e ��--3 '� e • � � 1 � } l�{ t �� y = = �/ !� � . �.� j �� z\.,��'� iz� �.' �� +t��! 3 2 � C ' ` �9 � � EL� ; :��. ,� '-� ,- .. r,�- - L,,,=�';��.,� . � �� -'� =g _ tF��,.-. � '� , fl� i f i � , •T ��- �^ \J � �s ' � .^G �- 9 `+� `Fy� •� — � F- _ 4,.��.{ AVF �-�J � � / ~ 1t� � V �/'�\"�+��r-��\10�� .�\3E� ��'�2Z ��"�,'Z� 25 -�— �_ 1' ' - �k- � i -`f �;,,� �i�Y �`��""1. �% fiC� \!Q � t� � \g1� 9 1:.P!� 0 _5 S 2� � j . . � ' r � r �. • � ' Z �-�� f —� !'—T— � '� — ` �� ; ' i ``_ \` _i�'�:� ,..y/�� , � ' . �\ � ?��-�._ a ! � ,�.._� � t _. i'� . : �:. `'a. ' / \ .. � � ;1 / c . �. ', I C 1 � � ' r' I - i . . . : �r; � ' , v-. � � l�. \ � . � � '. _._ _ : , � _ , t�; _ � / �� ` .;�=�% � � � � _ ��.i, � : � , �� 3 �'.;�.�; : - ' a i.� i-�. _ � . )'�` `\..� i'`�` . �. - v��h`t� �,.� /`. i", � �� `'/ .\ � _ 2 �7 � 9 .° �qr 0 s :i ��` � .' ' � � !.� � � � r� ' t .�,_.! 1 ,,_�� 1� -� �` . ii � _ ;` . LL - � ! ��` �. `.. /.. _ .. rJ .-•iJ . � �� t l �\ �t. '�' A � ., � � � � ,> � . �3 , __ ��. v °�^ ,- Y' � �, .� i� • , Y _ � � Q . � i. �� , i,� 7r . _ 3 , �, � J , �- ; � ,� �� . j .� _' � � ,. > . _ , _ : ; — __ � � � . �. �=�c�c,... \ , �; ., � �� . _ i _ _ i .. .' ' : � .. -��-- _ . ^ _ .. y _ l . - �.�_.� _�' � � Q .�' ; � �;.`,,�5 �' , ;�. ;t,r�os��r� cH Z� � �: � ,r � t �� _� r-� � ( /�6�j'�� 22 J ,P � . � .r �. . . � r - �` � 3 �t , ' - �^_��' „ ..� <� � �� :i I 1 !\�' : 2 _ �I� F, :'� � � f . .� ' ` r. _" _"' -_._ ' ( . ' �.. � I�� '_, I ._ . ._y F-�__.. /.'�J ' . V �� '�_' —5- ` .- .(. "" -_� � ' ' , CJ , LJ � � � , �. � (�J �� .�r) MEMU T0: MEMO FROM City Manager City Council ��iasim M. Qureshi, City �ngineer MEMO llATE: December 3, 1971 NIEMO NUMBER : CNI # 71- 2 0 RE: 4Uater, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Drainage Improvements In the Area North of Osborne ltoad, West of East River Road to the i�lunicipal Boundaries (Projects #101 and #102). The City (:ouncil this year held Public Hearings for water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and drainage improvements in the above mentioned area and authorized th� administration to proceed witll the improvements as presented to the�,;public. 'lhe City has now received,a soil boring analysis report for the area. 1'he report shows a varying amount of peat and in some cases tne peat depth is almost 30 feet. This will make the utility and drainage improvement cost higher�and will also make certain portions of the land in the area difficult to develop. AY1 the property o�tne�s, exce�t Pred Yesnes, i.n the area have shown a desire to see the Ci.ty p.roceed �nrith the i.mprovement of these facilities as soon as, pos;sible. Instead o£ doing all the improvements as autfiorized by the City at one time, we are suggesting that the total improvements be broken down in different stages and the City only proceed with the 'first stage of the improvements. On the attached three maps you will see the locat=ion and extent of different improve- ments authorized by the City Council and the improvements proposed under tfie fir�t stage. Anothcr factor in determining the staged construction was an unfavorable decision by the courts regarding the lawsuit with 5pring Lake Park. As the Gity Council knows, there is a need for taking care of ' some of the immediate drainage problems in the Onoway area and beyond. So, instead of a complete piping system wE are proposing a partial pipe and ditch system which, if in the future it was economically � feasible and justified, could be piped. Even though the property owners would like'to see all utilities and roacls put in as soon as possible, we are suggesting to go slow and do the total work in stages. We are also proposing in the,first stage that all utilities under � Main Street from 79th to 83rd are completed and also, on 83rd between Nlain Street and University avenue so that we can open Main Street and 83rd Avenue in these sections. We feel that this will pretty much ' open up the area and if there is any immediate demand in any additional areas that these facilities could be extended easily and rapidly. ' � ' �ll � CM #71-20 � Page 2 � Twice before I have checked with the City Council asking them if they wish to proceed with all of the improvements proposed in the hearings and the Council's answer was "yes". We are still recommending , that this construction be staged as shown on the attached sheets. If the City Council wants to make any additional changes, or if they have any reservations, we should know now before the City expends and commits large sums of money. If the City Council agrees with tlie � first phase improvement program as presented, then we can proceed with the plans for bidding. , , , � � NQ/njs � � � � �J � � � 1 �'�� -��.:_ NASIM D4. QURESHI, P. . City Engineer-Director of Planning , � � ,� � .` . . . .,: , N �„ , �., � �� 1 � •. � � � i , �N �'�/ � - - �• � .`\ � / ` \'. �� . �� . �` �� . �\ - �� , i , . �:�. . , _ —J L—_- - - �,. �i , , -- — � �- ' .� �.! . '�� . �, �r � ' ��—� „\ " — — — � i �i=_;—� . . , .�.��:u�e�l��, _-_--_-� ___ ��G, � �� _ : -I � - :��". ��c � �. ,., — \'�� /400 :� �Y f + � ' , "� ��'i ' .,,. � ,.— � ��, ��l�lYlU��/t��ll _ �-�" ` � ��=: �� ' , '�- �'� " ��r'� -- � \�..� � --- � �� -� � )� r��„�� `��. `��"'"' ��-=.�.- .�_. ,-��. � ��;, . ^-e►� . . u.— .-� i \ � !YI y; ' � �� ___�_ �—__. i •�1 � � ' ` 1 L � � �r�ar F ��(� ' \l..•' . I �� !�;�1 � � �t� 'i gli��\,\ 1i �� ( - '� .' - *r -s-.r- �.«.ti� _ �,`-- 1/�.• '. - ;'- — � � � " ��-. -:. .. . a, ..� « --��,�— :.'"..` . .. ,a , ,'� .�, � �� `; • . .. . � . � ., - �� , ;,;---- -_ �_— —�_ � L ��. �, ., ..�. �: . ) j � � � � �;,� . ��_ ..:�. __ �_ ,_ � � _ .�� !� :�___� ��, � r ��. \ � ��':�\ _`' � � I' , ' ��. �\':' I , I• .� � _ •` _:% /'�� ' ' � J i � Material help only for bank stabilization STORM SEWER MAP legend� Construction proposed under lst phase improvement � (ditch) — — — — Improvement ordered by COUnCil �'��'�� 3zoo ____ __ ( I ii�i�i�t�iriNi�7tiD� , 3000 � I -_ --- _--_-_ _ I 3600 � s-F o 0 ' ` . � ......; _ _:� I/�\�� p ��I __ �---, � � i�____� -� � �-- _ ._- \ ��`�/ �I �� ,. �, � �.I; %� r � `�,;� � :�� `. Y. -i �;..1�'� — — ---"r ��, � ,.,� - � ''��'` :� -.=� ��• - � � � � � :i �---�-_�-=;1 1�.�` +� � l L - --=-� j ,I' •' -- —_. . _.-�_ . i � �' 11 � �• . I � ��. --...: �—.1,::��- --- i � �1��1��•.. ��: - / _. _ I'' � �'-� _�! �I.. - - ...•-�/ n ,. . r --� � '� . � !e _ � _� _ 7 �_='I.`. - 32 � __ �� I ��--,�-- . // i , „� � 1� 4' _ 1 :-�.. 1 �;'� ;� � ��: � � I � �; ' ��-��,-.. : _ _ _ 3'_' :; ...., . �I �{� �; ---�-'I � :, %j ' �,/ r a --. �;r I ti � �r r I�� f ��: �1" � -�,.::: - -�.11. ,. .., r�; � ', , �� _ � _ n' \,� _.__ .. _ .� .. .. . 3 i o o . __ . _ - t v ,; � � 1 � � . . . ; � ��. 1 � . `:` - , `��, 3000 �� ;�� , � `t. , I . � � J fi` , �\` �:- �i - ; .� �, ;t. -- - - f '�"'� — -- . --_ _ . .�i � - � ---- -- - -- - � � ��• — . , _ ... - , .. � � ._ ._-- -- _.._... __. � ..� ��\ - — ._ . •' - .��" . � :'�\',. � , C ; ' d_ - . — — �?.-.�� I ' � --�: ,. . .. _ , .,,. ; ,. C . �-`. �.s�J -... -. ...,. �' \`�� 3�00 � � .. � � `.�. . /800 � s��- ,y ::'� /40 0 � ' ' "" � •�' � � � � � ' � �• . � '''�� 9 - ��' � . r� . 1 , .... — � �� ao � ��uu� aaawu'a' i ; \ �, = I ' '.. - ► ,. " �..: ��,,�=-:�` -=�-_ : i i I�;'� � i •. i � �! '� °� . `_'—'_—' t a \�{.�� Z a � '� � o ( - . �- . , ,... . .,...: . �� ? = I � _,,....�,�-6` \ .,••� •' ' `�.� ' i I - � • i • � � I \ �. � �'".� ,,.�� " �� --- - ' : .. • �` -- - ---- I s= •� ' - � �t- ti •' - :_s _ _ .. � I I(" ; ��t i ' � `•�� d j I ..I� � � � 11 ,� � 1 �\`, I�� ,; 1 � �! •1 (. I' �� t ��' . \\ `y V 'il i �� :1� I - � � r � 4� L .�;1'. r�� u� ! � �i _ ' . ` . `�. ..' .,°. �,��\ �� , _ ► , ,� , ',M io.I;�,1 � I :I � + . �� . ��,�.:I a • r.� ' I' i ' . - ., � .,,, �;o� � ! =;, �:..i� �; " J � i , _., - \ L' i�' ��---5-- '; � I �%� .,«(� � J + �iM_ ��.•'Ji _l. � 4__ _ `\ -- a�- �, '~ . � � ,; e n �;\ ..Q �� ' � �� 1 � WAT E R M A I N M A P '' �' � �, �,`, n. ;�; ' ��: � ,C�.., _ , . .. ,� r .. . ., \ � Y � . G�. �� +. �� .,' legend� �l �. � ,� ��. ;:) M' , �I� ' ., o.. �. `� � . ,.s%' --'r+ � � e�'' 1 � , � .- � \ �� .,.I • ,�. Construction proposed ,,,, ' • i "'•/ � "' �-'♦" under lst phase • �-- e . . �., , �,11 ` , I ^��-_-' i improve�►ent �� ,:�� .� .:. ., - � +{ �! l � � �--°_ �.S 5 I :� ��'r'_"_ , '•� Improvement ordered ''. '� -'�' '' � i ;�± ,� :• •' ��!_ , i ' ' ■��N��B�n�/�f� ' �i � �r '�� i by Council �' , � �"' � � � � " '1� '� �°. �' . .u.c'... �'c ' (� � � -�. i �, ��- z�__�_� � �',� • I � '; _ i ,._._.1�__ __ i ' I ^ ` � . u.____..-, � + : 1 ' � �` e�i 1i�1 �i , rI � I r�J�� - 6� � � �4 • 1F• /, � J; �.-.. --i�=:.: :� • •; i`I � / ei v , I'`�J `' '�o� � , _t' I - � f 1( � .♦ _ � � � J�L�_ 11I �I � � ��i j /yy, .a..:.—::� ii I I � I ' I � ( f I � ___' "_'�_.. •�/// �' U � �� T/ �'� � f �--11—*--.b�/ �_' ��t' �� ♦�'_ .—.. � _ __ _ � •w � � . ' ____l �N ;� . :. .. .. ; �. �---:. '� 3zoo 3000 �� . i , � 3 \�` I .. _�;.� .. .._ — —..__ _--- --_------ ------ e-_- � ---- - -- �._ - .�n; , \�� '��,Y ' f � _ - --- - �-�_ e.. _ �� f�U��l� � �� . ..,. �. .�. , �� I ' '�1.-�, � _ - - `..,� � 3G0o �f ��.��;_�I ° ..,, „ �. ��` � �� Nh� •' ' n:s� � `9 � .. � `� �"bm 4��a�=-`"i° � ie •��1' _ ��I ``� s ,�:.. .-� __� - � � � � . �_ _ _: ¢ �.. _ .. „ _ _ � _______ � — -_____�- � _o.� � , _ ��: : e _ _, a. � � ____ E _ ., � .. ,, �� .� .�,�.- V;. , a :�- :, -� ....� ,�,, � �: .y..., „ -- .. . 9:` � \'�' �nnu o ..: �.... .. 8 , _,> - - - - - -- �� `'�C=' u ., ..,.,.M,J..o� ,�?,: � i . -- �`-.. , . ..; t�. � ' �; - � � , ' . ...,. _ _►_� `� r ��„ _._ � p ° �_—�-_ � -�, - � �� — - - -� - �-- i e ��-� .. —a � � �b. �! -_,-- �' �\�,� d' L._._ ° `�� ....,.� ,. � I � - . �,� I �� —�( . �.�Fµ - -- ,�,. - --- . ±I �,• \� \`` �: � 1� , \ �. �'\,v. `�\, - � ;� � . . . . �.�� + � ( . �� : ' • •... a k ` '� ��-----o-- � . • , � • \ '%� n 1; _ � - "� -- -�I � ' , �� ,� , �� .1� , . �� , � �� .� � � . ��. i: � � � �\..' m; �• � . � C � � f � s. i ' '��.�,� ' � ��b '� � 0f, �'_— ��'��_ � � � _- _- � ;�'. , �, . ,. , • — -- `� ;� H s�; . � � � � . ;,� _ °��:� ' I �� m ♦ o•� V ,SANlTARY SEWER . MA ��,�o •�` ��; �� - �-�� _�-- .. __ -- '•,��{> .e.. .,.. '� t�� legend� , ,, •:� �;,� -% . ,: •�,` . P• \ � �• ++^ , Construction propoasd W r-� \,��`� --a- � � i�. under lst phase � �r �, , ,��;"� k `'; -,�, ::��.J _ improvement � ' �•�� '1�` �' ° > � ; ' '+ � �'-- � ;i��1�� ••� : �I= -Y . �---- � i� � ,t�__,� Improvement ordered �� - --�:,__� .��',`'�_ � `— < :� , � `" T%�' k' 1 nnn��suNr �, �,,.• �i� r, :1 � � by Counci . ,, . i o , � '•�;i � p; � , i1,`' �€ - . �'_ " ;1!,,°' �, � Tmprovement hearing to -Y�_-.-- � ,, « p� `��? be held December 13,1971 �1 --�� . t @"-� � � __ � �� q �I '.Ir -- =..i.__ .. _' � __ —�� B � , �� ' � v; . .. -...c:.. i i� 'j1� ;� ' i �� 1�, j.: �I . ;! � � ' 1d�_ 7 � , � � �f - �'-' , i(� ��"�" �` ....,.� ��`�' , ,� � � ' � J/ � .o!C I �,� t .^----.. .. .. � 1 I �.'�' /�• I�I�, � t �p � � 1 I ' I �. � ��✓ � 1tESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVII�IENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERT'ISENIEIVT FOR BIDS : WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PROJECT N0. 102 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5�-1971 adopted by the City Council on the 17th day of May, 1971, Resolution No. 78-1971 adopted by the City Council on the 12th day of July, 1971 and Resolution No. 149-1971 adopted by the City Council on the 15th day of November, 1971 set the dates for hearing an the improvements, as specifically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as EXHIBIT "A", and WI�REAS, aIl property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of the impxovements (as noted in said notice) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council hea.ring through two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. WHEREAS, Resolutio No. 66-1971, Resolution No. 136-1971 and Resolution N��rQ�, adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley ordered these ements. WHEREAS, and pursuant to these resolutions, Comstock and Davis, Consulti,ng Engineers, has prepared a report, plans and specifications the lst phase of the improvements proposed by Resolution No. 59-1971, Resolution No. 78-1971 and Resolution No..149-1971 and has presented plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. Inc., for such NOW, THERE�ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: + 1. That the Ist phase of the improvements proposed by Councif i' Resolution No. 59-1971, Resolution No. 78-1971 and Resolution No. 149-1971 shall hereafter be designated as Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project No. 102. 1 � , 2. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 3. The work to be performed under Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project No. 102 shall be perfo�ed under one contract. �� 35 The City Manager shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days), and shall specify the work to be done and will state that bids will be opened and considered at 11:30 A.M. on the 17th day of January, 1972, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project No. 102 Page 2 � " with the City Engineer, and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five per cent (5�) of the amount of such a bid. That the advertisement for bids for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project No. 102 sha11 be substantially in form as that noted in EXHIBIT "B" attached hereto for reference and made a part hereof. ADOPTED B'�HE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS � �_� ''; , DiAY OF , 1971. • ATTEST : CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell , � MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham 36 0 �� • � 1 I � � � , ' , , � ' � , ' ' , � • � 0 � � /; � j�\ � \_-' HIGHWAY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Highways, hereinafter referred to as the "State", and the City of Fridley, hereinafter referred to as the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is considered mutually desirable to install lighting units on Trunk Highway No. 47 at 49th Avenue Northeast (2 units) and at 51st Avenue Northeast (2 units) and at 61st Avenue Northeast (2 units) and at Mississippi Street in th� City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGR�ED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State or City shall inst�ll or cause to be installed 8- 4C10 watt mercury_vapor lightin� units under 5tate P:o,ject 0205-40 and/or City Project 1907-3 at the above location, in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the State and ap�roved by the City. 2. Upon completinn ❑f the installation oF the lighting units the City shall main�ain and keep in repair the lighting u�its and distributinn circ�uits therefore and provide ±he necessary electrical energy for their cperation, at the cost and expense of the City. . � � 0 3� � ' _ ' � � ' �� ' � � � �� ' � ' r 3. The City indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State and all of its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actio�s or causes of action of whatsoever nature or character arisiny out of or by reason of the performance of any work provided for hereby by the City, and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of a�serting any �laim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of the maintenance work to be performed by the City. 4. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid maintenance work to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the Sta�e; and all claims that may or might arise under the Workmen's Compensation Act of.this State on hehalf of s�id employees while so engaged, and any an� all claims m�de by any third party as a cansequence of any act or omi��cn on the part oF said City employees while so en- gaged an any work contsmplated �erein shal.l not t�e the ohligation and respensibility ❑f the �tate. Th� Ci±y shall not he rzsponsible under the Workmen's Compen�aticn Act for any emplo��Be:i of the State. i _z_ . �• � - _.. _ �9 CITY OF FRIDLEY APPR�UED AS TO F�RM: ey Mayor City Attorney (Seal) 8y STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMERJDED FOR APPROUAL: By �eputy Commissioner of Highways Traffic Engine�r Dated• Department of Highways District En:�ir�er � Department of Nighways APPRCU�D: Assistant �e�nmi��i�n�r-"��aintc�nan�e Departm�nt of H;7hw�ys APPRO'!ED AS TG FORi" .4^:D EXtr'LPTIC��! : �; ._.. . ___. ___._ ^_� JF7E'C1�� i�5'::��c!r� •�L.�C'_�rI`�y �i.-.c.�?_� �� APPRO!JED : DEPARTM�NT CF a�r��INISTRATICN: 8y Dated�_ � � u � .� � , 40 � RESCLl1TI0N '� 8E IT RESCLVED that the City enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota� Department of Highways for the following pur- pose�, to-wit: � To r��intain and provide electric energy for 8- 4�0 watt mercury vapor lightin� units on Trunk Highway 47 (University � Aven 49 h h n' + ue) at t Avenue �lort east (2 u its) 51s.. Avenue � , Northeast (2 u�its), 61st Rvenue Northeast (2 units), and Mississippi Street (2 units} in the City, in accordance ��ith � this Agreemert, a�apy of which was bsfore the Council. � BE IT FURTHER RESOLUED that the proper City officers heret�y are authoriz�d to execute such agreement, and therehy assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obli�ati�ns contained t�erein. �. _ �• 1 State of Minne�ota County of �nnka City of Fri�ley CERTIF'IC.aTION I h�r�by c�r.tify that th:�� foragniny R2solu.tion is a true and � corr�c � CO^'y� Or I'��01'.; tl Of1 ;li �.c��l �°� t0 cf1�; ��OG �E ' b�f thE Cnunci l Cf tt�e Ci.ty nf Fr�.c'1_.�y ai: _. diily ay��:ori��, ra�etin,� *h=�r�ef held on the , '1ay �f ,_, 19 , as- �hown hy t�e minutes of sai� Imeetin��ir my ro::sessi.on. � �JE'�i� � I � c�ty' �ln:!� . I � 0 I V � v 4 a � r P1 ..� `""� �`� � CITY O�F PRI�L'EY � . � t� C ��.. r n IY 1 ""' r. �a "� z_ .xaz..�...�ca !. j . ^.: � '.�^_� C�:^. � �.. � _ �... � � ' 0 .«.. �" � � � � ,� .... , . . _ . .I . �..� z��u � W N. E � � °� ,r�, � � I, �.j{ i� S Sj_a`� 1 � O '�c' € q O '� N ,j s N — S ' � �I �,; . —_ .. � --- � �Q�I:; _ �- `� .j j ¢ � _ �' / f�� w � �Q�•?- �_ ro��E an i _.� _ . _. ��. � _' _.;„ �( v �Mi�N tI_ ��— ;v' _ •z. �.,� 41 LJ� - k,.o . _ � Zt�o 400 Watt Mercury Vapor ul� Lighta at each Intersection. � Fnrnished and ! Installed by the l 4 State. �, Ma.intenance and ' ;I__ p�Wer by City. , �iE`�'�.,,; � --� ��.�� j � �i ' '--- c� �'S,t.__��-.� ��' � N � I _. a � � �� _� � gw� ,;� `�f�� , �1 yl, �i � �f �� .,�`�- �.� I ' �� 11J��` �`��__ — � �� -�. �F r ��A� � __''��— ' �� , _ I � ? � J" -- � � �, �TfT`liT`1f:��.. `/�. > t ��a� � i j � _ — .xE � —I �--�� L..—�,�)'�,� I1 � _ � �' _ �� __ �� >.a�. _o�.. � � � � , , -�� .- __ =- _ � , �- � �+ e = — F I, \0-' ,� i��''- _ - -_ -- _ �, � J ; 4 � �� _ __ __ — � � — - - o. ��.� I� I - �� y, _ _— ' _ = — :a �. .... CL �u � O _ ` � , O i ' .�ID.. ll � II � �� ' I1J'�'n -- —� = _ _.' � �' — _• -_ �� -_ _ " ' ..., _ �_' '.._ � I ,a "�� _ — _ __- _� _- _ � ' i� � ;�': _ - . :: - - , P;�� --' _._� ,_-. : __�' ��- � � ,� i� ; � ��=' -- •-� �- � - �- �I� � - STE2EET ?AAP-CITY CF �� ,��' -- � � _, _ _.�- ,��1 . �� - � - - , '_ F�.� � �� •,.� �-�� _,� � :..c ... ,.f * '�' : �.. �. ,.......� .... , _ � � r ,� b � +. _—�• � .... v �. ..,... ._ ... , . �-�� _ � . 42 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA November 22, 1971 MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION FOR CONSIDERt1TI0N Mr. Chris Chezches, City Manager of St. Louis Park, has contacted all suburban communities suggesting that they pass a resolution urging the Metropolitan Council to fully fund a recodi- fication effort of the criminal and traffic codes of the metro communities. Atta�hed is some material explaining this proposal. I have discussed this with the City Attorney, and he has suggested that this appears to be a good idea,�and that Fridley would not be under any obligation to adopt the recodification, if it were not satisfactory, upon completion, to the City Council. A proposed resolution is on your agenda for your consideration. I would recommend your favorable consideration of this resolution. Very respectfully, � � . �., �CC�� /�✓l�-C `ti � Gerald R. Davis City Manager GRD/ms it � RESOLUTION N0. ` RESOLUTION URGING PARTICIPATION BY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN FUNDING A RECODIFICATION OF ALL LOCAL CRIMINAL AND TRAFFIC CODES IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA . . . 43 � WHEREAS, there is a multiplicity of local governments in the sevea- � county metropolitan area; and I WHEREAS, each community maintains separate codes for criminal and � traffic offenses which creates a situation of non-uniform law enforcement among municipal jurisdictions; and '' � WHEREAS, it appears extremely desirable to modernize and reorganize such codes on a comprehensive, uniform basis for the benefit of the citizenry and law enforcement agencies; and '� WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities has access to funds provided by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration for such worthwhile projects; therefore �� BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley that the Metropolitan Council is hereby requested to study and urged to fund a � compret�ensive, uniform recodification of all traffic and criminal codes in the Metropolitan area. ADOPTED BY THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL THIS , 1971. ATTEST: CITY C�ERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL DAY OF MAYOR - JACK 0. KIRKHAM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORAI�'DUr1 Jerry Davis Virgil C. Herrick , November 1.I, 197Z Recodification of Criminal and Traffic Codes I have examined the letter of November 1, 1971 from the City Manager of St. Louis Park, together with the attached material explazning the proposed recodification of the crirrcinal and traffic codes. I am of the opi�ion that this would be a good project, and that the City of Fridley should join in the proposal. It would appear to be a method of obtaining a substantial recodification at 1ittZe or no cost to the City. I believe that there would be substantial value in having a uniform code for the suburbs. If, hoi�ever, the proposed recodification would not receive the approval of the Fridley Council, we wou.ld not be under any obligation to adopt it. I suggest that you present the propose� resolution, together with my comments, to the Council for their consideration. . i� %/, VCH ' 0 •� � , � 45 _ _ : � _ �._. G'�� st. �u�s �rk � � � 5005 minnetonka boulevard . saintlouis park, minnesota 55416 • 612/920-3000 L �� \ � \ � �., � y �.; ' � �\ November 1, 1971 Mr. Jerry Davis, City M�nager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota Dear Jerry; i realfze that you may have recently recodified your Iocal cri�inal and traffic code, but with the ever changing laws and court decisions, this is a major job. Some uniformity should be maintained with our metropalitan area and I am suggesting we (aZ1 metro aommunfties) work toward this end. One method is sug�esCed in the enclosed materials. I believe we can obtain 100% financin� for this proposal if �ae unfformly scepport such a worthwhile project. 8nclosed is a brief justification for reco3ification and a draft of a resolution you could use to support this proposal. I would be happy to "carry the ball" with Metropolitan Council with your support. All metro communities wi11 be contacted relative to tfiis preject and hope£ully cae can start someth�ag "goin�" as soon as- possible. If you support this idea, perhaps you wiil move to obtain your Council support by the passage o� a Resolution and send to me in order for the proposal to be initiated. CC:cg Enclosures Be x e 4r �; C erc City l:anager a Some have and some T propose we do sc Council (fo: fuil to have somet':�in�; can be kept up to The Need: RECODIFICATION Pro� osal to Suburban Cities haven't kept �ip their criminal and traffic codes... by psssing a joint resolution to Metropolitan fund�ng) to have this done to allow each community in common--a uniform criminal and traffic code �ahich date once �. goos one is provided. It is,obvious that any criminal and trafiic code must be periodically reviewecl and modernized to �'eflect the current status of the criminat and traffic laws; periodically it should be examined to eliminate sections which have outlived their usefulness a;�d to fill in �aps which have become apparent thr��^h c�ntinuel use. ,, For example, the St. Louis Parlc OrdinGnce Code contains u provision regarding cock fighting wllich may well have outlived any usefulness, whereas, the Ordinance Code doe� not contain a trespass provision to provide for protection in the situation where an individual enters a building �aithout the consent of the owner but without the use of force. Periodic analysis and modernizction oi any traffic and criminal code is � further made necessary so that accour.t can be tzken of the current case law established by the Courts. ror exan�le, the existing code provi�ions in every municipality involvin� the offenses of lurking, unlawful assembly, and breach of peace, require re-examination and possible re-drafting to ' � avoid constitutional problems, t•That ma�,es ttiis necessary is the recent United States Supreme Court case of Coates c City of Cincinnati, 91 S.Ct. (June 1, 1971) in which the Court indicated its current ttiinkin� on the I due process issue as it relates to va�ueness vis-a-vis tne const�tutional right of free assembly and associatior.. In that case the Court held that the particular unlawfcl assembly ordinance was unconstitutional on its face as it prohibited Qersons from assembling with others "and conduct(ing) � themselves in a m�r�ner annoying to �ersons passin� by...." The Court held the ordinance unconstitutionally vague because it subjected the exercise of ;.he ri�ht of assembly to an unascertainable standard and , further held it unconstitutionally i;road because it authorized the punish- ment of constitutionally protected cunduct. � , i � I � The Court further noted that mere public intolerance or animosity could not serve as the basis for abridgement of constitutionally protected freedoms. Similarly, a modern code must reflect the ruling in the very recent Supreme Court decision of Cohen v California, 91 S.Ct. 1780 (June 7, 1971). That ca"se involved a conviction of a de�onstrator for disturbing the peace by "offensive conduet," to wit, wEuring a jacicet with the incription "f.uck the draft". T'tte Court reversed the conviction concluding that the State may not, consister_t with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, malce the simple public di.splay �f such a phrase a criminal offense. 4:� I � r This particular ordinance was not held to be unconstitutionally vague ' on its face, but rather, th� conviction taas reversed because it was found to suppress the �ndividuals freenom of expression. There are, of course, other United States Supreme Court decisions, � Minnesota Supreme Cour� dec�sions and I,e�islation which must be talcen into acco�cnt in drafting a currently acceptable traffic and ordinance code. One additional e:cample r�i�ht suffice. On March 29, 1971, the , State Legislature approved a statute pro�iding that drunkenness is no longer a crime in the State of Minnesota. As a result, any ordinance section in conflict ��ith that principle must be analyzed and revised ' with the thou�ht ia mind of protectin� both the public and the person who becomes int�xicated. Thus, ar. ordinance �ust be provided givin� police officers � ut?�ority to t=�lce into�;icated persons into custody fo?' the purpose of transporting them to a tiospital or receiving facility for � their own protection as well zs that of the community. Additionally, a compretiensive, up-to-date criminal and traffic code o�ould � provide the opportunity for workin� tow�rds substlntial uniformity in law enforcement within t1�e seven county area. .That would not only encourage police cooperation and there£ore furtiier the effi.cient administr�tion of � justice, but a unif.orm code would eliminate discrepancies in prosecution contingent on iohich side of the street a particular person happened to be when he committed an act of one sort or another. � Further justi.fication for revision of the traffic and criminal ordinunces is the very apparent need to improve accessibility to the law For. the benefit of the private citizen, police cfficer, adninistrator �ind court personnel. , This would hopefully be achieved by 1o�ical org��nization of the code and a well drafted inde�;. � Indeed, there na}� well be a serious constit>>tional problem raised, if a criminal or Lrafiic code is so poorly or�anized as to be inaccessible to the average person. In a recent Supreme Court decision, United States v Internal Piinerals and Chemicals Corpo-ration 9Z S.Ct. Z097 (197].), the � Court had before it the questi:on of whether it was fair to punish a:r.an for violatin� a federal aQency regulation of which he was totally unaware. Although the Court in that speci£ic case held that prosecution was ' permissible, the issue of accessib_lity and notice certainly was raised and must be considered by those responsible for drafting and promulgatin� criminal and regulatory pro��isions. � The Benet�ts: , It is clear, then, that tl:ere is an obvious need for modernization and reor�anization of the present crimin�.l und traffic ordinances in�o a comprehensive code which reflects recent constitutional and statutory changes. This code will of necessity have to be oroperly organized, � easily accessible and one c��hich would be acceptable throughout the seven county metropolitan �rea. , � ;2- �.� r t The Cost: � Approxim�itely $15,000 - $17;000, �aithout community printia� char�es and boolclet noteboolcs for officers... , Summary: By general support rrom all of you, I. �m sure tha� this caill be an � acceptable L,E.A.A, Metropolitan Ceuncil project. Can ��e get together on this o:�e? .. �. , �� — - ____�.�� . - �-_' - �y_ '_-� . r (,`hris ches St. Louis Park � October 5, 1971 � � � � , � � , �J I '1 . . . I , � ' �.� �_ , r ' , � � . � � 4) RESOLUTION N0. �� - �971 A R�SOLUTION CORR�CTING RESOLUTION N0. ?14-i971 CONFIRMING THE STRf�T ASSESSMENi FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-4 (CORRECTING ASSESSMENT ON LOTS 22 AND 23, BLQCK 7, ONAWAY ADDITION WHEREAS, certain speciat assessments have been levied with respect to certain in error � • - --� � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO as fottows: That the assessment levied against the following described parcel, to-wit: Lot 22, Block 7, Onaway Additiorr, a portion of which shoutd have been assessed on Lot 23, Block 7, Onaway Additio�, sha11 be apportioned and divided as foitows: Original Parcel Fund � Original Amount Lot 22, 61ock 7, Onaway Addition ST. 1970-4 Stteet $ 36.80 Correction of Assessment on Parceis Fund Original Amount Lot 22, Biock 7, Onaway Addition ST. 1970-4 Street $ 32,00 � Lot 23, Bio�k 7, Onaway Addition STo 1970-4 Street 4.80 � 3 . o ADOP7E�BY TNE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIO(.EY THIS � , � DAY OF 4� �..� - , 1971. � � ATr�sr: CITY CLERK Marvin Co Bruns�ll MAYOR'� Jack 0. Kirkh ma APPOINTMENT FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - DECEMBER 6, 1971 NAME POSITION EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY Ferne M. Insley Secretary November 29, 1971 $475.00 1475 15A Street N.W. Assessor's Per Month New Brighton, Minn. Office 1 .� � � 1 I '� \� \ �\ I �J REPLACES Sharon K. Waldstein �� 1 51 � 1 1 C L A I M S 12-6-71 ' , , � GENERAL: #26979 through #27131 LIQUOR. #6156 through #6199 ' _ ' ' , .. � ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 52 MULTIPLE DWELLING LICENSE to be approved by Council December 6, 1971 September l, 1971 to September l, 1972 NAt� Address Units Fee A roved b: Allen Properties 5955-65 3rd St. N. E. 4 10.00 Firs Prev. 6629 Clinton Ave. Minneepolis, Minn. Otto Tauer, 5866 - 2nd St.N.E. 4 10.00 Flre Prev. 5866 2nd St. N. E. Fridley, Minn. � � � - 53 1 � CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES TO'BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL AT THEIR REGULAR MEETING ON DECEMBER 6, 1971 GENERAL CONTRACTOR APPROVED BY ' E1View Gonstruction Inc. 7601 - 73rd Avenue North ' $rooklyn Fark, Minnesota By: Mr. Danald Kutz Bldg. Insp. __� .. Inventor's Engineering, Inc. � - � r 7735 Beech Street �.E. 1. Fridley, Mi.nnesota- By: Edward Gordon Bldg. Insp. ROOFING � ' Potvin Sales Company 7341 Commerce Lane N.E. ,' Fridley, Minnesota By: Felix Potvin Bldg. Insp. � � . .. ' , 1 � ' � � ' ' / ' � ' - , ' � ' '` ' : � �, • i� � � � � � ESTIMATES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL - DECEMBER 6, 1971 Comstock & Davis, Inc. Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 FINAL Estimate #2 for the furnishing of Professional Engineering Services for planning Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project #105 PARTIAL Estimate #2 for the staking out of the construction work for Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improve- ment Project #105 from October 4 through Oct. 30, 1971 Dunkley Surfacing Co., Inc. 3756 Grand N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421 PARTIAL Estimate #2 for work according to the plans and specifications on Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Improvement Project #103 Bury & Carlson, Inc. 6008 Wayzata Boulevard Golden Valley, Minnesota 55416 PARTI.AL Estimate #3 for work completed and materials on hand this date, according to contfact for Street Improvement Project St. 1970-3 $ 733.33 $ 1,371.04 $27►292.64 $89,546.42 54 I , � L��{s��:,.^:��`% 63 "'.)i:�.:.r'n.l ~ , �: is.. 4i�s7i�`'L''.'..�`S IJ L:;'�'�.�J:�:.�.4=::'� �.�:riv° �''3`�t-"�.,'-��i �`'`.3��a ��3� $ii�.�aA`,i��'i.::i��.d �:�•T F•.w'!.:L�"`"''-��:v.�.4 .'l.jJ�„�i� 2a�°J�'��:�t'-�..:' tL� i�l�� .� g � ,{Y tl . .. . - . �'�/.s. .� ��. v�a� . �Fi.�l � . w.'�i�:.2,�.i..� . - . �°N�i �I.,`i a 'i��`.'�.1 i• s. .....d �'� a��, E:''.ij�.L�: ��'oi� � � . �.,c:iC.j @��.:� �'�.��fS-,+e•'•o' � . . . ,.� v�l� �r;3'� r�..��.� � s,C�y�' .�` .: ��: i�. o�'= a . . :��.,'+"e'�..'��'F�',;3� -5:�'3 � F��=,'3;ws:.:,�> ;;� a�' ��: ts��a:l�'��.'�''w4t='.�+� e° . . � - . � - �Sy�3°��a �if.+`.",�p 4.>i� P,=P� 5::2�v�.� y�4t?^..p i.��a a ��t �Em.:�.''�'s�' �� ''.� � : �l � �� R mv i�:� ar L .'�,�i... � �<.,s�ia,._. a °' :.�r.9 �� ,?'.a � � � ; �Y i1 f � w�: :�, :_._ _ , � � _ >3 a,... � , .., s �� Ze'1� 3 -s��. :.s �! yo.:3 <i;,i,£' e .��4:4 � ;� f . �� '_�.3"�" ;�:� E: ::3 �'.,��'s tti'3..,a,xita *�)s.�"��3 � 3<�'�;.�:v£;� :-3 ��•'''•: ��h ,� �� E33i: �:��.� :AC''.,�5�°' I.BY-�� Fdl� �asi? �fwaeltYi.t.�v.>��. _�(1-�9:`b,.."Q+B.� �� oi.�r+i� ��%wF.� c'u� v�. >��i�.� L �p�, a� �0,{� ..�Sa (i1 �a .i. �'''_✓. �Y"�...� JGS.'.,�%u.e-$:i� 6r{+:�uaazi ��kF� ^ �� , •1F�Y�Y ,a5:..� �.-e e'3"t,�3 e�c.. �_... T�x�Y... .i�..r�a,��y G es� �F+i�T:� ��.�af y � . fd1''e:LY�i�!'dd',�e.�fiie� 3��.s'��'t�'9t:�_c,.�y.�u � _ . s,�3.d��6b.f�b7 � fg?"-�'��,Pv �� t'��s�e'"'?ti, �^ ... b�� 3a c�� :a�:�� '�`.ti�. ��a�r S. � r; ,..:'°a s�:�,c �.,'"...� 2�"t�a .4 ��,,�`'��'�� a �� {��`7.3.;�,�-,''%i �'�, 1''.� �:7 a�..�%a-�.,�'.'�e r u _ . • s a s e . a • u o e o <. s a o • n • • e +�q' �� a.�.'l `�?�e•W ag µ).�.� y4u'?. s.��.^'t`:re9 , - ,R�'r:.-, .— a � , • S . a�.s .; a �vAzt=., €S :�.�� S ��'iis e �" J � s d�� ;�s<�� ; �'�;� � _ -�;;_��..:. �� , . , ,�-,. � ,,s" � y �� g �Ya '}� � � E. . v i.>-•+, ,. i'`)� „� . . � �i s"v ... �' � �>; .r � r � ':� a�.z�a�a . �' � �.., _> �� . .� ��. . a�yy . _„ :.w...._ . «. y : u v '.i? . � -. c '�• i'o,;'.' �^_:1y� .1Sj` �� a 55 I � 645 >bUl 5� , fl�D f�Gl�f f�ICiG LflB0�flT0�y Inc. T�ll� CITy Tf STI�G , CHEMICAL & PHYSICAL TESTS • INSPECTIONS • RESEARCH HOME OfFICE: 882 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL. MINN. 56114 BRANCH OFFICES: BISMARCK, N.D. MINOT, N.D. FARCiO, N.D. GRAND FORKS. N.D. S�OUX FALLS, S.D. WATERLOO, IOWA ROCHESTER, MINN. City of Fridley Mr. Jerry Davis, Manager 6431 Univeristy Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55421 City of Columbia Heights Mr. Malcolm Watson, Manager 590 - 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Gentlemen: a�"�+w,� CHARIES W. BRIT2IUS. P.E. y � President $ JOHN F. GISLASON. P.E. '+� ' �f Executive Vice President �'�yp NORMAN E. HENNING. P.E. V�ce-Preside�t Engineering ALBEtiT C. HOILER. F.A.I.C. Vice-President Chem�stry and Metallurgy CLINTON R. EUE Secretary Treasurer November 22, 1971 RE: Burlington-Northern Distribution Yard Fridley, Minnesota We understand that you desire information pertaining to all.owable limi.tin� crir,eri�: for safe control of blasting operations. We are aware of your concern for the safety of your residents and their property near the above referenced construction. project. First, we should acquaint you with our firm, the history of our development as an independent testing laboratory, and the scope of our operations: Our labortory was founded in St. Paul in 1938 as an independent testing laboratory. At that time, it consisted of a small professional staff and relatively simple testing equipment. All operations were scheduled from the single St. Paul location, where construction materials testing was performed. The growth of the company has been steady. The organization has grown into one of the larger laboratories in the country. We now have a total staff of approximately 220 employees, including 56 professional people, many technicians, and a�.lerical staff. Our operations are based from the main laboratory in St. Paul, as well as from ten branches in Minnesata, Wisconsin, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Montana. The scope of our work has expanded from simply the testing of materials to include inspection and material consulting in the fields of soils, construction materials, metals, chemistry, and special services. We are the only testing laboratory in the i3pper Midwest capable of providing comprehen- sive testing and inspection services in every phase of material evalu- ation within Che jurisdiction of the American Society for Testing Materials. We are an active member of the A�erican Society fRr Test- A9 A MUTUAL PROTECTtON TO GLIENTS. TNE �UBLIC AND OUNf[LYEf. ALL REPORT! ARE 1UBMITTlD Af TME CON�IDENTIAL 1110PlRTY OF GLIENTS. AND AUT/IOR• IZATION FOR PUOLICATION OF fTATlMENTB.CONCLUf10N! OR EXTRACT■ FROM OR RE6AROING OVR R[rORTf 1! RE![RV[D PENDING OUR WRITT[N A►PROVAL 1 � � L � � City Manager of Columbia Heights & Fridley November 22, 1971 Page 2 ing Materials and the American Council of Independent Laboratorie�. We are active in the American Concrete Institute, the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, and the Consulting Engineers Council, to mention but a few are�,of our concern. Our professional people are active in the many technical societies such as the American Society of Civil Er.gineers and the National Society of Professional Engineers. Our area of operation is primarily the Upper Midwest, where a sig- nificant portion of that work is performed in the ltain Cities Metro- politan area. Our testing snd investigation work,however, extends nationwide. � Many individuals at our laboratory are experts in the several areas of building construction. We have been involved in the investigation of many major structural failures. Our personnel have performed many Federal Housing Administration requirad tests. We have tested and � provided materials recommendations for virtually every component in wood frame construction. We have performed certification tiesting of many prefabricated floors, walls, roofs cabinets, and window systems, � to mention just a few of the structural components of the normal home. We have investigated almost every type of imaginable failure in wood frame and comanerical construction--from settlement and water damage to bombing and lightning damage. Our investigators have the advantage , of being able to draw from a staff of experts in nearly every type of construction to provide our client with necessary material or sys- tem information. � j u i , ' Our clients are primarily engineers, architects, and owners. Many government agencies and public utilities also retain our servic��s. Contractors, likewise, h�ve retained our firm to formulate entire quality assurance programs and to provide testing or material recom- mendation services. Considerable research in the field of building damage due to vibrations produced by blasting has been conducted by the U. S. Bureau of Mines,among others. A partial bibliography of publications dealing with this subject it attached. The consenus af opinion of these investigators is that particle velocity, rather than acceleration or displaceu.ent, is the parameter most closely associated with possible damage to structures. Langefors, Kihlstrom, and Westerberg, reference ��8, proposed that no noticable damage occurred at vibration intensities less than 2.8" per second throughout their studies. Edwards and Northwood, reference ��5, noted that damage was likely to occur at a particle velocity of 4" to 5" per second and recommended a safe limit of 2" per second. F. J. Crand�ll, reference 4�1, proposed that a quantity he called energy ratio (ER) be used �ro evaluate possible damaging conditions. He concluded that an ER � equal to 3.0 was the threshold limit of damages. An ER of 3.0 is equavalent to 3.3 inches per second. � On the basis of a statistical study of the work of these and other researchers and 5� � � 1 ' � , 5� City Manager Columbia Heights & Fridley November 22, 1971 Page 3 also of their own experiemental data, the U. S. Bureau of Mines has proposed that if the particle velocity exceeds 2" per second in any of three o'thogonal components, "there is a reasonable probability that damage could occur to residential structures." ' Thus, particle velocity should be measured in three mutually perpendicular directions, one vertical and two horizontal. Also, because most data used in the research was obtained on or in the ground outside structures and to avoid the necessity of con- sidering various responses of a wide variety of structures, it was further re- � commended that the velocity gauges be located in or on the ground rather than in- side structures. � LJ � �J � In conclusion, the safe vibration criterion(2 inches per second) is not a figure below which damage will definitely not occur or vice-versa. Rather, the probability of damage increases as vibration intensity increases above 2 inches per second, and decreases as the intensity decreases. In fact, many structures have been subjected to vibrations considerably greater than 2 inches per second with no damage occurring. Similarly, given certain conditins of stress within a structure, minor damage at velocities less than 2 inches per second is feasible, but should be the exception rather than a rule. These investigators have generally described the threshold of damage as being the development of hairline cracks in plaster or the enlargement of preexisting cracks. Plaster cracking is genrally used as the threshold since it is generally the weakest member of a structure. � BRD:rw � Copies to: (1} Barton Contracting Company. (1) Park Construction Company ' Attn: Mr. Gerald B, McDonald � Laboratory Number 8-2561 � � , Very truly yours, TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. � . �j/ � � i `�7 �1i�--n.,..�.,.� �� l/�-c.-C �s-�- Brian R. Dobi�, P. F.. Supervisor, Soils & Inspection Dept. 4 ..r ,e. . -._ ... :. . . . � . .. ..:........ .. . ...... � _ -.:.;. ".�... �.:._.,f... _. ..�: .r � ' , , . . , Firo Phone 560- I 500 � t� ; � I � �� CITY OF FRIDLEY Bureau of Fire Prevention 6431 University Avenue N. E., Fridley MINNEAPOLIS 21, MINN. Memo To: Gerald R. Davis, City Manager F rom Da te Robert D. Aldrich, Chief Bureau of Fire Prevention . December 2, 1971 ,.. _ ��.... :.�:.__ �__�.._�__._.__.LL... '.... i a+L�e� ' L BUS. �%F10nE �J�i� � 59 Subject: Park Construction Blasting As\you have requested, this is a summary of the current situation regarding the blasting being done by Park Construction in conjunction with the Burlington Northern Project. The complaints being received by my office are generally from two residents. 1 am continuing to receive them and forward them to Park Construction. I am attaching the most recent report of field data compiled by Mr. McDonald and also the full reports of the Columbia Heights Engineering Department's representative, Mr. Art Porter. As to comparison of seismographic readings, I have now been informed t that Twin City Testing does not monitor the charges. The readings now are those taken by Mr. Porter. -. , i � The Golumbia Heights City Council did not accept the recommendations the.,loint Meeting produced, but they have retained as a consultant, a gentleman by the name of Al Schroeder. He is to be a consultant to the � City of Columbia Heights, and is to make definite recommendations as to size of charge, number of holes, type of explosives to be used, and set limits to the size of charge in relationship to the proximity of the � blasting and homes. In general, he is to prepare a recommendation for the Columbia Heights City Council as to what constitutes a reasonable action as far as this project is concerned. � � r Mr. Watson indicated to me that until this report is complete, he is continuing under existing guide lines for the blasting i.e .3 in. per second, more blasts and fewer holes. It appears that we will have to wait the recommendations of Mr. Schroeder as to any change. Dick Smith of Barton, has indicated that they probably will be completed in Fridley before the end of the year. � YOtI C�n Help S�P F��ss 0 SAVE Lives � �J �� `� � �:; � � . �- Nr �� , 3. , � / � OP�STRUCTIOt� C0. GRADING CONiRACTOR� ' � 6 4e � � g � 61 THIRTY-$EVENTH AV�"i. N. E. •..n•''' MINNCAPOLIS, MINNE$pTA 64421 � Tc�[�HONC p6fl-86p9 November 30, 19?1 � City of F'ridley � 6431 University Avenue NorthEast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � Attn: Mr. Robert Aldrich Fire Prevention Chief 1 Re: Blasting Burlington Northern Classification Yard Dear Sir: � � � � I' , � � , , r �. The da'.a in this report cover from November 12, 19?1 thru November 29, 1971. DATE TIME N0. OF HOLES POUNDS PER HOLE HOLES PER DLT,AY » -�2 3:35 39 s.o 2 3:35 39 s.o 2 3:37 39 s.o 2 3:37 26 7.0 - 2 . 3:39 40 5.0 2 11-�5 ��:35 20 8.3 1 11:35 20 8.3 1 ��:38 20 8.3 � ��:3s 2� 9.5 � 11:41 20 9.5 1 11:4� 20 9.5 � 2:05 20 8.3 1 2:05 20 9.5 � 2:07 �g 9.5 � 2:07 �9 9.5 � 2:09 r9 9.5 1 2:og �e g.o � � 3:40 20 9.0 � 3:40 �9 9.0 1 3:42 20 9.0 1 3s42 20 9.8 1 . � � ' � � ,. r,'" i. r � �� _,: s r. �j� �, �.� a. � � ��'� � . r � .. � �1 GRADING CONTRACTORS �� i1 THIRTY-SEVENTH AVE. N. t. � �� MINNCAPOLISr MINNB30TA �5421 I ` ' Ts�erHONe 768-8669 � City of Fridley (con�t) DATE 11-18 ��-19 11-22 ' TIME 11s3� �1:36 11s39 � 1:39 11:41 11:41 3:37 3s37 3:40 3:40 3s43 3:43 3s46 3. 46 ��:36 ��:36 1�:38 11:38 11:40 11:40 11s42 11:42 3:33 3:33 3:35 3:35 3:37 3:37 3:39 3:39 3:4� 11:37 11:37 11:40 11:43 ��:43 ��:45 N0. OF H� 16 �5 �6 16 16 16 16 .. 1� ' �5 15 �9 �5 16 16 16 16 18 16 17 17 �5 17 �5 �5 �4 �9 16 �3 16 10 18 �5 16 �5 12 16 POUNDS PER HOLE � 8.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 5.25 9.0 9.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 �.0 8.0 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 s.o 8.0 �.8 . '].S 7.3 7•3 7•7 4.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 7.8 4.3 2•4 8.5 HOLES PER pELAY 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ � 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' R y � � � � x?� �� ,..f.l�.. .�� ,� .��'^ � ' 1 1 City of Fridley (con�t) DATE TIME » :45 3s35 3s35 3:37 3:39 3s39 3:4� 3:4� ��-23 ��:34 ��t34 11:37 » : 37 11s4o » :43 11 s 43 � 3:35 3:35 3:38 3:4� " 3:44 3:44 3:47 3=47 11-24 ��:35 11 s 35 11:37 � � =37 , 11s4o 11:40 11:44 » :44 3:3� 3:3� 3:34 3:34 3:37 .3:37 N0. OF HOLES � 16 16 �7 18 �9 �9 20 �7 11 18 18 , �7 16 �5 16 20 17 16 18 �5 � �� ,r ! , ,18 , '. , 17 ,. 18 17 �5 �5 �5 �5 16 16 �5 �4 �5 16 16 _.__. ..� �� GRADING COI�ITRACTORS ��,.• S1 TMIRTY-SFVENTH AVE. N. E. MINNEAPOLIS� MINNE90TA 664Z1 � T[l[rMON[ 78B-B6B9 POIINDS PER HOLE 7.3 6.6 8.3 2•3 5.8 6.3 7.8 4•3 5•� 6.1 6.4 7.8 6.3 7.7 5.5 8.7 5.0 4.s 9.� 7.1 7..� � '�. � ?.5 7•9 � 7.5 7.1 7.5 6.3 7.5 7.1 8.4 7.0 • 7•5 ?.3 6.7 7.2 7.6 HOLES PER DAY � 1 1 � � 1 1 . � 1 1 1 � 1 1 � 1 � � 1 � 1 . � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � . � 1 1 1 ' �� ,. � , �' �� ` �.-,� ; �,� ��u� � � ��J �� F,`� GRADING CONTRACTORS � � ; , � A ,. st TNiRTY•![VENTFi AV[. N. [. , � ..w•• MINN[ArOLIl. MINNESOTA iS4Z1 � ' � ' T[LtrMON[ 7i6-B6B9 City of Fridley (con't) DATE 11-29 TIME ��4� 3:44 3:44 11s31 11s31 1�:33 11:33 11:37 11:37 11:39 3:37 3=36 3:39 3:39 3s4� 3:4�. 3s44 3:44 3:47 3:47 N0. OF HOLES 16 �5 15 18 16 �s 16 16 �4 16 16 16 �s �9 20 20 20 1s 20 20 , The Seismo�raph readin�� are as follows: ' ' � DATE 11-12 11-15 , READING .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .16 .�4 .07 .09 .o� .05 SH07.' 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 1 . 2 3� 4 0 POUNDS PER HOLE �.o 6.3 6.3 7.3 7.6 6.3 7.1 8.0 7.6 6.9 6.9 8.0 7.2 7.1 ?•5 7.2 7.8 7.0 6.8 5.s HOLES PER DELIY 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 - ti � IACAZ►ION 4021 California - 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4042 rlain 4042 Main 4Q42 1�1a.in 4042 Main � 4042 Main 4�42 California (behind 4042 Main) 4042 Californi�. 4042 California 4�42 California u [-] � .,. � �4�� :,�,� �`" �, u3; � �� '' ' 1 �� 1 . F�� GRADING CONTRACTORS � � :��- � �� S1 TMIRTY-8EVENTN AVE. N. [. .w... •,. MINNEAPOLIB, MiNNBSOTA 864Z/ , 7[Lt�NON[ 78B-B6B9 City of Fridley (con�t) DATE � 11-18 ' • 11-19 � , �J READING .08 .0� .17 •�4 •�5 .07 •�5 •�5 •�4 •�5 •�5 .07 .08 .08 .10 .1Q .18 .09 •�5 .20 ' " .18 •25 .07 •�3 .10 .12 .10 .OS .09 .07 .16 .15 .12 .09 .07 •�9 .27 SHOT 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1Q �5 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ,9 10 11 12 1 2 5 6 7 � LOCATION 4�42 California 4�42 California 4o2i California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California 4021 cali£ornia 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 Cal�fornia 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 Califorria 4021 California 4021 C�.lifornia 4021 Ce.lifornia 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California �"'"4021 California 4021 califorr.ia 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California r � ' �� ,� � �� i� �,,: ,.,.> .�� ' � ' � �, ��'� � ' 1 ± / F�;, GRADING CONTRACTOR� � � �` � 1�'�.. fl TMIRTY-6EVENTH AVE. N. E. •� M• � ' ' ' � '� r � ' � LJ ' ' ,' , C_ity of Fridley (con�t) DATE 11-22 11-23 11-24 R�ADING .1 C� •�4 .11 .20 •�7 .07 �'� 3 .09 •�3 .10 .11 .07 .05 •�4 .11. .09 .08 .15 .06 ,_. .16 .18 .14 .10 •�3 .20 .18 .12 .08 .10 .09 .10 .07 .14 .17 •�5 .16 .07 SHOT 10 11 12 �3 �4 �5 16 17 2 3 5 6 7 1 2 3 5 7 10 11 �3 14 �5 3 4 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 MINNEAPOLIB. MINNEHpTA 85421 Tc�[�NONC 79B-B699 IACATIC�N 4021 Califorr_ia 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 Californsa 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 C2.lifornia 4021 California 4021 California 4021 Califorr.ia 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 Califorr.ia 4021 Californi�. 4021 California 4021 California 4021 C�,lifornia 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 Califorr.ia , a+� r` � i' • � T �- �� . . . z �e }r' � � �1 v� � �`k.. >�"� 1 � ' � � �� F�fi GRADI�IG COt�TRACTORs � G , '�� I. ti4�'�',.. 6/ THIRTY�`3£VEhTH AV£. N• E. ......• MINNE/�PGL�S. MINNE9pTA 1964Z1 � r ' , 1 ' ' u City of Fridley (con�t} DATE 11-29 READING .0� .�s .�4 .�o .05 .08 .08 .05 .06 .og .06 .05 .05 .06 .06 .05 .06 .04 .10 - •�3 .14 SHOT �4 �5 16 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 s 9 �o 11 12 13 �4 �5 16 17 Tc�c►MOw[ 7QB-H689 LOCATI�N 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California 4021 Ca].ifornia 4021 california 4021 California 4021 California 4021 California Ar�y damage clains that co�e i.n a�e now forwarded directly to the Insurance Company. They have had their clains people out checking the claims. If there are any questions, please call. GBM�pn cc: Dic�: Sr,,ith File 38-71 Yours truly, PAP,K COPTSTRUGTION COt-LPAi�Y /: � �� r�� Gerald B. McDonald � Bu�iic�i�r� Ir��p��t�� r�menet � C�� f �ric�le Y Y Mc�nth. November � Year. 1271 MON7HLY INSPECTION REPORT ' � ' � ' ' Section ; � C .� � � .? � I •1971 � 1970 Inspections � Nov. � No�. Rough lns : New C;onstruction _ 11 _ J __.. -- _ Footin�s:_ New Construction ___ 32__ _ 24_ _. Framings F� Reins=�e�ti�ns 35 31 __ Wor7� Nof 12eady vr Reiected __16_ _ __ �4_-_ - -- - --- _... __ __ - - -- � gns - --_ 2 - - --- 4- -- _ _. _�top Work= �osted -- - 6 - -- 3- --- _ __ _ _ _ . _ -- ---- . - Violations Checked _ _ _ __ $_ �,___ -- ---- ---- -___ .. Dangerous Buildings ___ _ _ _ ___ 1_ ___ 7__ __ �om aints i.hec%ed-� 11 15 _ _ _---- _ -. 1�Tiscel laneous _ 2$ 35 �ina�s: ResidEntial �3 �2 Finals. Commercial � Indust 9 _ _ _ _4 . ._ 1'otaJ. lnspections 182 157 ' � � Permits is�ued ! Ti.s� �ff/ Sick Leave Hrs. . . . .J._ .,_.� -�.T--- ou�� Tns: New Serv��es '�Reinspcctic;.:s �,_ __ _ -- __ ? Work tic�t Ready or Rc; j ec ted ____ ' C i Dangerous Buildings __ _ -_� Q± 4Miscellaneous � C �Finals Residential , � � � Fir.als:�Commercial $ Indust. ' � Total Inspections a. = Permits Issued � Time Off/ Sick Leave Hrs. � ' 1 � ` � V � W -22 i 13 - -2 3 �.�_ 4_. __ _�_ � __ � � --�-- 74__, 45 ---4 2 - - Rou�h_Ins: New Services ��__ Reins�ections_ _ 21 _ Work Not Ready o_r Rej ected __ __2 _ Si�ns _ _ . -- _ _ --- - __0 DangsrQUS Buildings. -_ -.0___ __ Miscellaneous _._ __�.__ -- --- - -. - . -_ Finals: Residential �_. _ . -- - -- -- Finals: Commercial F� Indust. __ t�____ _ _ _ Total Inspections � 5� �ermi�s Issued , Time Off/ Sick Leave Hre. _ 23 _10._ - - 0--.. 1 . 0. _ - -� -- 18 -.- : 1-�_= 30 I 25 This Last Year Year To � To Date � Date �4_4_ -1,0� _ 196- ---202 _661 _ _ �O1 __. __49_ -$2 ---- �-- - �� ----14�_ _�6 _ ___44 _- - --].1.1- 2_�1 .' 226-- - _. 22.Z- . -- 29-7 __ --1.$Q _- _212_. --- - --82_ --�Z4 �_ __: —�3__ . .. _. ---�-0 _� _- 0._ _-�4- - � - --- 614 . � 107 _20.� _ ._201-- -�49- - -- 296 - ---�3- - _ 1�-- _18.__ _ _ 13 _ - --�- - -� - _�.2_ _ - 4L _. ..1D2- -- � � n _ —1�► _ __�-� � 356 I 299 TYPE Blacktopping Excavating Gas General Heating House Moving & Wrecking Masonry Oil Heating Plastering Roofing Signs Well Drilling PERMIT NO.'S TYPE �kl l, 238-�kll, 281 BUILDING ��8729 - #8758 ELECTRICAL ��5091 - #5103 HEATING ��5459 - #5476 PLi1I�ING ------------- SIGNS NUMBER OF LICENSES CURRENTLY IN EFFECT AND LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TO DATE NUNIBER FEES COLLECTED 10 $150.00 15 225.00 34 510.00 107 2,675.00 41 615.00 2 30.00 27 405.00 7 105.00 4 60.00 1 15.00 14 350.00 p 00 2(2 $5,140.00 PERMIT F,EES 1971 1970 THIS YEAR LAST YEAR NOV. NOV. TO DATE TO DATE $6,173.00 $6,094.00 $31,939.44 $15,483.00 926.50 433.00 10,009.05 8,057.80 223.00 372.25 8,586.00 4,087.25 2,573.25 225.25 10,033.00 3,815.00 00 35.00 1.453.25 1,249.00 $9,895.75 $7,159.50 $62,020.74 $32,692.05 � LJ , I� � Ii i � ' � LJ � ' � i � L� I ' ' �ity of Fridley, Minnesota ��fice of the Building Inspector TOPIC: MONTHLY REPORT TO TI� CITY MANAGER NOVEMBER. 1971 NUI�ER OF PERMITS ISSUED 1971 1970 THIS YEAR LAST YEAR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION NOV. NOV. TO DATE TO DATE Residential 14 7 85 44 Residential Garages 12 9 79 87 Alterations & Additions 13 6 154 169 Multiple Dwellings 2 1 10 3 Commercial 2 0 8 4 Industrial 0 1 2 7 Municipal 1 0 3 0 Churches & Schools 0 0 0 1 Hospitals 0 0 0 0 Signs 0 2 53 54 Moving & Wrecking 0 1 12 12 44 27 406 381 OTHERS Heating 13 24 219 206 Plumbing 18 24 180 157 Electrical 30 28 356 299 61 76 755 662 ESTIMATED VALUATIONS OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Residential $312,480 $ 182,400 $ 1,126,656 $ 1,100,900 Residential Garages 142,206 26,750 370,292 218,879 Alterations & Additions 927,556 10,415 2,737,879 835,343 Multiple Dwellings 730,800 590,000 4,924,509 1,330,000 Commercial 102,000 0 685,400 158,000 Industrial 0 1,250,000 79,000 1,475,600 Municipa.l 20,000 0 2,627,900 0 Churches & Schools 0 0 0 10,000 Hospitals 0 0 0 0 Signs 0 500 48,376 63,242 Moving & Wrecking 0 50 19,665 5,650 $2,235,042 $ 2,060,115 $12,619,677 $5,197,614 , � � � PUBL:CC WORKS DEPARTMENT (�ITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - OCTOBER 1971 STREET DEPARTMENT HOURS 1. Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275� 2 . Grave 1 Haul ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3. Miscellaneous Str��et Work . . . . . . . . . . . . 1832 4. Patching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123'� 5. Shop Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 6. Signs and Barrica�ies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 7. Equipment Repairs - Street . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 WATER DEPARTMENT 1. Filtration Plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o 2. Final Readings an�d Collections . . . . . . . . . . 3. Hydrant Repairs and Flushings . . . . . . . . . . 4. Miscellaneous Wat�er Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Pumphouse Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Standpipe Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Valve Inspections and Repairs . . . . . . . . . . 8. Water and Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs ....... 10. Water Turn-ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. Watermain Breaks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12. Watermain Taps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13. Equipment Repairs - Water . . . . . . . . . . . . 178� 53 114 352 75 6 6 7� 35 92 332 4 192 SEWER DEPARTMENT � 1. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs ....... 1122 2. Miscellaneous Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46'� ' 3. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning . : : : : : : : : : : : : 56 �+. Sanitary Sewer Inspections LO 5. Equipment Repairs - Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . I232 , � � � STORM SEWER DEPARTMENT 1. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning ....... 1102 2. Miscellaneous Sto�rm Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . . 142� SNOW and ICE CONTROL 1. Miscellaneous Snc�w and Ice Work . . . . . . . . . 91� 2. Equipment Repaira - Snow and Ice Control ..... 302 Page �tao PUBI,IC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - OCTOBER 1.971 MISCELLANEOUS l. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12 . 13. 14 . Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Holiday. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Human Relations C;ommittee . . . . . . . .� . . . . Locke Lake Dam - Project No. 104 . . . . . . . . . Park Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seventy-third Ave:nue Project . . . . , . . . . . . Sick Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vacations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Water Meter School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weekend Duty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment Repaire� - Engineering . . . . . . . . . Equipment Repairf: - Fire Department . . . . . . . Equipment Repairs: - Park Department . . . . . . . Equipment Repairt; - Police Department . . . . . HOU RS llZ 336 8 21 227 79 82 148 48 42 4 38 56 53 ._.. _ _ 8-79 (REV. 1t-3-64i . , . . i i � j ' � ' ' � � ' � , , i � , ' - � 1 � � �{ , � — a L { , ' � , , , � � � , _ �� (Stondard Form of the International Associotion of Chiefs of Police) (Copies available at Fed��ral Bureau of Investigatio�, Washington, D. G 20535) _ _ CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT _ _ POLICE DEPARTMENT cltr of Fridley Montn of October . 1971 TABLE 1.--DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL Average Daily Percent Oaily Ave�age Daily Numericai Strength Absenr.e Absence Temporary Detaiis Average Effective $trength � Endot amemonth Samemonth Samemonth � amemonth � - Same'month this montt last year This monl last year This month last year This mont last year This month Last month last ycar Tot�� perSO�nP�. 27 27 9.21 8.39 .32 .2? 13 .79 �3 .3? 13.61 Chief's offlce . 1 �- Records bureau . Unlformed force . 1 Detective burr.au � Trafflc burean . Flrst relief . . . 1-0 Secrond rellef . . 11- Thlyd rellef . . . � �� 10 7 TABLE 2.--CHANGES IN PERSONNEL 7ABLE 3.--DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTN 1. Present for duty end of last month .�: ........ 2$ � Same month Thts month last year 2. ftecrulted durinq month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � �� . 3. Relnstated durinq month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Total number of patrolmen . . . . . . . . . 2� 22 Totai to account for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 2� 2, Less permanent asslqnments (publlc � � offices, clertcal, chauffeurs, etc.) . . . 4. Sepamtions from the seivlce: � . 3. Less deiails to speclal squads ot bu- _ 1 reaus (trafflc, vlce, park, etc.) . . . . . (a) Voluntary reslqnatioq �. . . . . . � . � � �� q. Averaqe daily absences of patrolmen (b) Rettrement on pensim ..... ¢sslqned to patrol duty owinq to: . � (a) Vacatlon, suspension, rest (c) Reslqned with charqes per.dinq � days, etc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. (d) Dropped durtng probaticn . . . . � - � (b) Slck and ln)ured . . .�. . . . . . . . . (e) Dismissed for cause . . . . . . � (f ) Killed in line of duty . . . . . . (c) Temporary details . . . . . . . . (4) Deceased . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total separations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Total averaqe daily absences . . 5. Present for duty at end of month . . . . . . . . . . . .�_ 5. Available for patrol duty . . . . . . . . . c g.33 .56 .3z 7.64 .53 .22 9:21 �.39 13.79 Z3.61 • �, I -� :.. w � ,� ' , �` TABLE 4�- CRIME INDEX AND POLICE ACTIVITY TREND , OFFEVVSES KNOWN TO THE POUCE CHANGE CURRENT YEAR VS. LAST YEAR CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES ' (PART I CLASSES) REPORTED OR ACTUAL wS. SAME MONTH VS. SAME PERIOD KNOWN UMFOUNDED OFFENSES ACTUAL THiS LAST YEAR LAST YEAR ' � THIS MONTH THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT � la. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT I� MANSLAUGHTER 2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL 2 � a. RAPE BY FORCE - '� b. ASSAULT TO RAPE - ATTEMPTS ' 3. ROBBERY TOTAL ZO � , o. ARMED - ANY WEAPON b. STRONG-ARM - NO WEAPON I. ; ';' 4. AGGRAVAi'ED ASSAULT TOTAL $ � a. GUN � b. KNIFE OR CUTTING INSTRUMENT � e. OTHER DANGEROUS WEAPON `� d. HANDS, FIST, ETC. • AGGRAVATED -- - � _- _ i 5. BURGLARY 70TAL 16 16 13�. I a. FORCIBLE ENTRY 1.Lp �.L4. ,� I' l � b. UNLAWFUI ENTRY - NO FORCE 1 1 13 ( c. ATTEMPTED FORCIBLE ENTRY �.. 1 2O ; 6. LARCENY - THEFT (except auto theft) ' � o. S50 AND OVER IN VALUE 37 37 39g � ; 7. AUTO THEF7 6 b rI$ ' , CRIME INDEX TOTAL � ib. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE � ' 4e. OTHER ASSAULTS- NOT AGGRAVATED 13 13 g ' 6b. LARCENY, UNDER 350 IN VALUE (I;. 51} PART I TOTAI �'�6 �-1+6 1349 � TOTAI PAR7 11 INCIDENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9S . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ,�.�,2� . .. , TOTAL, MISCELI,ANE0U5 NONCRIMINAL CALLS . U�� . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �.O�.g�I-� . . . TOTAL CALLS FOR POLICE SERVICE . . . . . . . . ��3 : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � � �:1-2 , , , � . ' ........... Il 15 31 7 ]20 ' AUTOMOB(LESRECOVERED , , (A) NUMBERSTOLEN LOCALLY AND RECOVERED LOCALLY ............................................... 1 I (B1 NUMBERSTOLEN LOCALLY AND RECOVERED BY OTHERJURIISDICTIONS ................................... 1 � , (C) TOTAL LOCALLYSTOLEN AUTOSRECOVERED ...................................................... 2 (D) NUMBERSTOLEN OUT OFJURISDICTION,RECOVERED LOCALLY ......................................... 9 � •' • ; � � , � 1 11�. 433 62 12q8 _. - I , � # , � i TA�LE 5-- VALUE OF PROPE�TY STOLEN AND RECOVERED • — - VALUE OF PROPERTY VAWE OF PROPERTY VALUE OF PROPERTY TOTAL VALUE OF ' VAIUE OF PROPERTY STi)LEN LOCALLY STOLEN LOCALLY STOLEN OTHER OFFENSE tOCALLYSTOtEN STOLEN LOCALLY ADID RECOVERED AND RECOVERED BY JURISDICTIONS LOCALLY OTHERJURISDICTION PROPERTY RECOVERED RECOVERED LO�ALLY ___ __._._ ROBBERY p L ' BURGLARY ' 7��c��- � - - • ---`--- LARCENY 11 2.o� z 665.31 2 665. 1 - --- CO z o0.00 6 00.00 AUTOTHEFT 2 �{;� 2 QQQ�(i0 Q�, �'° ToT^� $z5,96b.18 4,6b5.31 700.00 5,365.31 6,�ca.00 ' TABLE 6-- OFFENSES CLEARED BY ARREST - year to date (inciude exceptional clearances) �, NUMBER OF OFFENSES PERCENT OF OFFENSES CLEARED BY ARREST CLEARED BY ARREST CLASSIF{CATION OF OFFENSES TOTAL CLEARED BY ARREST OF TOTAL CIEARED BY ARREST OF , (PART ( CLA$$ES) PERSONS UNDER 18 PERSONS UNDER 18 . THIS LAST TMIS LAST THIS LAST THIS LAST � . YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR 4 1. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE # a. RAURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER ' . _ ? b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGUGENCE �"' 2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL IF 2 o. RAPE BY FORCE 1 < -b. ASSAULT TO RAPE - ATTEMPTS 1 ]. 1 3. ROBBERY TOTAL S 1- a. ARMED - ANY WEAPON L{. 1 b. STRONG-ARM • NO WEAPON 1 � 4. ASSAULT TOTAL I+L 3�+ 6 $ a. GUN Z � � b. KNIFE OR CUTTING INSTRUMENT c. OTHER DANGEROUSWEAPON i - 1 d. HANDS FISTS, PEET, ETC. - AGGRAVATED � e. OTHER ASSAULTS - NOT AGGRAVATED % 33 S g 5. BURGLARY TOTAL 29 `r 2 2 � a. FORCIBLE ENTRY '�� 5 1 b. UNLAWFUL ENTRY - NO FORCE 1 ]. ], e. ATTEMPTED FORCIBLE ENTRY 1 ].. � ' 6. LARCENY - THEFT (ExCEPT auTO 7HEFT) 23 �7 6 � o• E50 AND OVER IN VALUE b. UNDER SSO IN VALUE 331 ��{.� �E� �71 ,' 7. AUTO THEFT �. � 2 2 GRArlD TOiAL �3� � ji;� 15 6 199 .� i �. �. n . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . �. . . . . . .. .. ...... ..., ..�. _ . . . ..._.. 3i i.�..._.� TABLE 7-- PERSONS ARRESTED, CH�RGED AND D�lSPC►SED O� DURI�lC nl1�NTH _ ARRESTS PERSONS COURT OISPOSITIONS THIS MONTIi FORMALLY ' fNCLIii:E RELEASED NO FORMAL CHARGE) CMARGED i ADUITS GUILTY ACQUITTED REFERRED TO UNiFORM CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES THIS OR JUVENILE MONTH OF OF OTHERWISE COURT TOTAL OFFENSE LESSER DISMISSED JURISDICTION � � � JWEIiiLES ADULTS TOTAL ' CHARGED OPFENSE 1. CRIMINAL HOMlCIDE: a. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE 2. FORCIBLE RAPE 3. ROBBERY 4. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 5. BURGLARY - BREAKING OR ENTERING 2 2 2 2 6. LARCENY - THEFT (EXCEPT AUTO THEFT) "�� 6 I.1. 1. 2 7. AUTO THEFT ? 8. OTHER ASSAULTS (RETtlRN A• 4e) � �„ l TOTAL - PART I CLASSES �j O I_ 7HI5 YEAR TO DATE £? t! � fj 12 2�j 9 LAST YEAR TO DATE � 6 pFJb i;6 32� �-F 35 101 PERCENT CHANGE 9. ARSON 10. fORGERY AND COUNTERFEITING 11. FRAUD 12. EMBEZZLEMENT 13. STOLEN PROPERTY; BUYING, RECEIVING, 1 1 1 1 POSSESSING 14. VANDALISM 1. 1. 1 l. 15. WEAPONS; CARRYING, POSSESSING, ETG. 1 1 1 1 16. PROSTITUTION AND COMMERCIALIZED VICE 17. SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT 2 AND 16) 1, ]„ 1 l i8. NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS 19. GAMBLING 2(I. OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY AND CHILDREN 21. DRIVING UNDER THE INF�UENCE 9 9 9 7 1 �- 22. llQUOR LAWS � 1. - 5 �- �. Y3. DRUNKENNESS 24. DISORDERLY CONDUCT � 3 J 25. VAGRANCY 1 1 1 1 26. ALL OTHER OFFENSES (EXCEPT TRAFF{C) lO 5 16 5 1- TOTAL - PART II CLASSES �"� 2� �� 2� 1'9 2 2 � THIS YEAR TO DATE 2O3 3�1. 2 J, 2O 2 LAST YEAR TO DATE 2O O � O 1. � 1 26 � AERCENT CHANGE TRAFFIC ARRESTS THIS MONTH PHYSICAL CUSTODY ARRESTS WARRANTS SERVED I} � � 3 i CITATIO�lS ISSUED 3,.1 r'6 ��I �7 7ii. 2 11. TOTAL TRAFFIC ARRESTS AND CITATIONS 11 80 9�. 9z 77 3 11 — - , • 8-79a (Rev. 10-21-65I ' GONSOLlIDATED MONTNLY REPORT.: _ . _._. � -' TRAFFIC SUMMARY _ . ' _ ' _;Police Department _ . .. City of Fridley Month of October , 19 71 ' � - -- TABLE 1. ACCIDENT SUMMARY his Month Year to Date This Year Last Year o�o Change This Year Last Yeaz o% Change � Accident Total � 44 57 —23 434 526 lg Fata� : _ Z _ 3 5 ��.p �. PersonalInjury 22 25 —12 211 225 —7 ' Property Damage 22 3�- —3� 220 29s —26 _ _ __._---- Pedestrian 1 — b 7 —15 1 : : . TABLE2. ENFORCEMENTSUMMARY ' + 7his Month Yeor to Date { This Yeaz Last Year o10 Change This Year Last Year % Change : Traffic Total IOL� 73 +,�2 113z 1033 +9 � ' ; . _ f Hazardous Violations 90 52 +73 689 �79 +k3 , -orher v�oiat�ons 1z 13 —8 z�.b z6o —6 pazking - 2 8 —75 197 269 —27 nwi 6 8 --25 �z 50 —16 ' ' i Accident Arrests and Citations � � i " ' = _ _ TABLE 3. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY DF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS � This Month Year to Date This Year Last Year o�o Change This Year Last Year o�o Change Total Accidents 1{1.�. 57 —23 434. 526 —1$ - � Fatal Accidents • - 1. — - 3 5 —�?0 Pecsons Killed 1 — 3 fa, �25 , In�ury Accidents 22 25 —12 211 225 —7 Persons Injured 3L� 1a.0 —15 330 3�1+ —1-5 • ' Pedestrians Killed Z � Pedestrians Injured 1 — 5 —29 ,`, x�c �a Run A��aents 6 15 —60 67 �6 —23 i c�e�ea by aTTest 1 — 3 5 —40 �� cte�ed - �vo �est 1�, 3 +33 36 �E2 _15 Totai ciearea k 4 39 47 —1� ' . � ' � ; � _ ' . � '�. 1 . _ � :..__ � TABLE 4. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY �'�CCIDENTS AND ENFORCEMENT (By Hour of Day and Day of Week) Monday Tuesday Wedn�esday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citatio Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Time dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest 12 M 1- 1. �:oo - 1 i z 1 2 2:00 1 z 1 1 1 a:oo 1 1 4:00 - s:oo 3 3 1 � 2 1 s:oo 2 2 2 2 1 1 7:00 l l 1 s:oo 1 9:00 1 10:00 1 2 1 1 ii:oo 4 1 1 5 12 N 1 /�. 3 1 i:oo 2 1 2 1 z:oo 1 1 1 7 1- 1 s:oo � Z Z � 1 1 4:00 2 1 jF � 5:00 1 1 2 s: o0 1 ` 2 � 2 �. 7:00 2 _ 3 2 �. 2 s:oo _ 1 2 1 1 9:00 1 io:oo 1 1 z ii:oo 1 1 1 Note: "Citation and Anest" column should include aII traffic citations and arrests made during each hour period except pfzrking citations. I' � _. __ :� 0 I. . . . . . .. . . . . - -- � � ' ' �� . . . ' . , � 1 TABLE 5. COMPARATIYE SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT (By Violation) This Month Year to Date � This i'ear Last Year This Year Last Year o o Change ' xaZ�aous v�oiac�ons Tocai 9� . : 52 �9 505 +36 D� 6 8 4z 5� —16 sPeea�ng � 59 25� 333 239 +39 . Reckless Driving 1 O iq, -I-S� Careless Driving Ei 6 51 fi2 —18 Traffic Signal � 3 g9 31 -f- scoP s�� 2 2 26 29 —11 Other Regulatory Sign 1'� 2 1'7 11�. -I-21 Improper Passing l _ (� 3 -I- Improper Turning _ _ _ u. 3 -I- Right of Way - Vehicle �% !+ �' Right of Way - Pedestrian _.. � . _ , , _ Following Too Closely ]. 2 - ..}_ No or Improper Signal 1+ + Improper Start from Parked Position Improper Backing Improper Lane Usage : �. 15 10 -f 50 Failure to Drive - Right • Defective Equipment �- �+ �+�- ��- Other Hazardous Violation �i 2 3�. 15 -I- . Other Violations Total �: 13 2LE (� 260 —5 Pazking Violation Total `� g �97 2�9 '�27 — - I' RETURN A - II MON7fiLY RE�fU�N t�F OFFENSES Khiai"IN TO THE f'OLICE ' TO BE f�ORWARDED TU T}IE DF.PART�ti1ENT OF' PUBI.TC S��ti'fY, 1246 UNIVF.RSITY AVE., ST. YAUL 5510�i [3Y' T}(i: SEVENT}! DA�' AFTER CLOSE: 0[� �tON7-tl. See other side for inscruccions. ' 1 2 3 4 5 OFFENSES RE- NUMBER OF ACT- IYUAtBER OF OFFENSES CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES ORTED OR KNOW NFOUNGED, l.E., UAL OFFEIVSES CLEARED BY ARREST TH[S S10NTH (PART II CLASSES) TO POLICE (IN- FALSE OR BASE- (COLUMN Z MINl1S A b CLUDE "UNFOUND ESS COM1�PLAINT COLUMN 3) (IN- OTALOFFENSE.. SV ARREST OF , ED° AND� CLUDEA'PTEMPTS CLEARED PERSONS UNDER M87C`I'E P�� MO• Yr• �O• YT'• �'g0. Yr. 8�n�Q'�-UDED�lg`�a) 9. Arson 1 1 � 10. Forgeiy & Counterfeiting 5 26 5 z6 7 11. Fraud 2 2 1 � ' 12. Embezzlement ' 13. Stolen ptoperty; Buying,. Receivin Possessin �- 1 14. Vand�lism 32 ?'7�+ 32 271� 1 2k 1 ' 15• Weapons; Carrying, PossESSing, etc. 16• Prostitution and , Commercializad vice 17. Sex Offense (except 2& 16) 1 ;27 1 27 5 1 18. �Tarcotic Drug I.,aws :Ll 11 10 $ ' J 19. Gacnbling ° � 20. , Offense Against Family and Children .1 1 - 21. Driving Under Influence � .3g j�. 3$ � 3� � 22. �,iquor Laws ' 2 ;37 1 2 6 2 36 1 21 3 � 23. Dru�tkenness 1 ?2 1 22 1 22 2 24. Disorderly Conduct 36 2��6 36 29b 5 lg3 1 15 ' 25. Vagrancy _ �7 7 7 26. All Other Offenses ' _(except traffic)' l.l+ 77 14 77 4 35 2 7 TOTAL, Part II Classes 95 �?� 1 95 $19 17 3�g 4 71 , October 197�- [�opth and Yeac Dace ' � Prepared By � Chief or Sheritf DO NOT USE THIS SPACE Fridley COU��y o; City INlTIALS ' RECORDED REVIEWED AUNCHED � BCA Form lli VE 1FIED 3000� 7/70 AD USTED , � I �, ' ' _ MOTOR VEHIC7�S ' M1.ls�g� G�� October �,g 71 MPG Eacpense CPiK r 1177 1z 0. 9 9. 7 1+3 . 54 . 037 '� c��t� �;. i�,i i3z.z g.b 6g.74 .060 - Uaf.� 4R 3701 581.3 6.3 291.Og .0'79 , Unit�# 50 503$ 693.8 7.2 242.82 .04g ' tta�.t� 51 6210 $99.5 6.9 281.36 .045 U�.�#` 52 1723 1$4.3 9.3 77.�-5 .a45 ' _ Uxai.fi� 53 3190 �.02.7 7.9 107.64 .034 ' . ' ° ' I ui snt d� � � � ' �rnia� T�gs � , ' ' Thie A�oni�,h _,�,� 74 Thia Year 1051� � . . _ SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 5-- VALUE OF PROPERTY STOLEN AND RECOVERED YEAR TO DATE ' ' . VALUE OF PROPERTY ��LUE OF PROPER?Y VALUE OF PROPERTY TOTAL VALUE OF OFFENSE �ALUE OF FROAERTY STOLEM LOCALLY � SiOLEH LOCALLY STOLEN OTNER LOCAILYSTOLEN S70LEN IOCALIt AND RECO�ERED �NO RECO�ERED SY JURISDICTIONS PROPERTY RECOVERED TH .ISDI TI RECO�ERED LOCALLT , LOCAILT 0 ER lU4 C ON ROBBEAY $��.� �d.�OO 1 ��OO ' BURGIARY < 36. 6 BO.00 �O OO ��P�E�r 17-�, 773 .79 25, �33 .32 25 �33.32 AUTOTHErT �3 u��.o� 33,27�.�� 19 67 .o0 52_ 9CO.G0 2t� o.Co TOTAI �255,278.�so $ 59,202.3� $?9,675.00 �7�,�77.32 �24.,075.oG �� i m