The URL can be used to link to this page

11/13/1972 PUB HEAR - 5596' _ 1 ' PRIDI.�:Y GITY CpUNCiL AGENDA * PUSLIC HEARING MEETING - NOVEMBER 13, 1972 - 7:30 P. M. , �P,�EDGE OF ALLEGI�NCE: ' RO : ' � , ADQPTION QF AGENDA: ', .. ' APPOI� N_T: , Appointing Wallace R. Stsswalt Councilman for Ward 2 for the 9alanco of 1972 (November 13, 1972 co January 8, 1973) ' AaA ' Adminiitsatlan o! O�th of Offica to Mr. Wallace R., Starwalt, Ward 2 ' . ' ' E'��kj� F�ARINGS• 1 1. On Street Iqprovoment Yroject ST. 1973-1 and ST. 1973-2 (MSAS) . 1, 1 A 1 1 1 +__T� �, ,'' PUSLIC HEARING MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 1972 OLD BUSINESS: �, Z. Consideration of Resolution A�rthorizing Multi-Employer � Approach with Regard to Police and Firemen Bargaining �' _ _ __ __ - - -- --�=--ihe -1973 £cxrtraet Year �ad F�ture Years (Tabled November 6, 1972) ' ' . ' ' ' ' , 1 ' ' ' ' 3. Consideration of a Resolution Releasing Certain Tax Forfeit Lots Entirely, Requesting Easements on Certain Tax Forfeit Lots to the City of Fridley and Requesting ' a Deed to the City of Fridley on O� Tax Forfeit Lot, and putting a Hold on Three Taa Forfeit Lots and Memo from Finance Director 4. Discussion of Circle Flow Pattern in Hyde Park, Requested by Councilman Mittelstadt COMMENT: On Oct. 2, 1972, Council and staff had a study session on this matter and it was discussed on the Agenda that evening. Council had asked the staff to meet with Minnesota Highway Department officials to determine the status of the State right of way and such a meeting has been arranged for Nov. 14, 1972 in the District Engineer's Office) 5. Consideration of Establishing a Policy for Enforcement of SFM SOl (Tabled November 6, 1972) 0 FAGE 2 PAGE NUMBERS & ITEM NUMBERS 2 - 2 D 3 - 3 G 4 - 4 G 5 , ' PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 1972 i' "`3}EW BUSINESS: ' 6. Receiving the Bids for Fridley Municipal Liquor Store ' _ _ COI�SENT: The bid of Keyway Builders came,in a couple of ' - minutes late but was opened on advice of the City Attorney. Mr. Herrick is researching this matter and will report to -- -----3tou--Manday-on--ehe status of-the bid. Cost'estimate for ' � building construction, mechanical and electrical work was $121,500 including alternates) and , Report of Financing Plan to Pay for Construction of the Liquor Store ' , and Award of Contract for Liquor Store Construction ' . , ' 7. Setting a Council Meeting for Monday, November 27, 1972, , With the Board of Directors of the Fridley Police Pension Association to Discuss Finsncing of the Police pension Fund ' ' ' . ' ' ADJOURN; ' , . PAGE 3 PAGE NUMBERS & ITEM NUMBERS 6 - 6 C 7 - 7 D I, OP�'I4iAL PUAI.Tr .TS+,� 1 I ' GITY QF :RZuLEY (EXfI�BIT ,A) � N01`ICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS STREFT IMP,ROVEt1ENT PROJECT S 1973 1 AND ST. 1973-2 (MS .) Wf�REAS, the City Cquncil of the City of Fridlep, Anoka ,^,cunty, Minnesota has deemed it expedient to receive evidence pertaining to t.he improvements hereinafter described. NOW TFIEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBy GIVEN THAT on the l�h day of November , 1972 at 7:30 o'clopk P,M, tlie Citp Council will meet at the City }Ia11 in said City and will at said time and pl�ce hear all parties interested in said improvementa in whole or in part. The general nature of the improvements is the conerruc�:.a� tYn the lands and street� noted below) of the followin$ i�provements, :o-�ait: �ONSTRUCTION ITEM Street impxovement&� including grading, stabi'.:!zGU ba��, t,p�-mj.x bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storcn 52we� ;=.stam, water and sanitary sewer aervices and oth�r facilities locate3 as follows: A. StreeLs Under Proiect St 1973-1• 1. 78th Avenue Alley Bet. Hickory Street & Beech Street to Main Street 2. 77th Avenue 3. 81at Avenue 4. Beech Street 5. A11ey (Bet. Beech St. aad Hickory SCZeet) b. � Ranchers Itosd 7. Univer&ity West Service Road �8. 41st Avenue �9. California Street 10. $orizon IYrive -�-11. Capitol Stxeet 12. Hughea Averue i.3. Cloarview Lane l 14. �ogper Lane Main Street to Ranchers Road Beech Street to Mai.n Street 79th Avenue tn 81st Avenue 78th Avenue to 79th Avenue 77th Avenue to 79th Avenue S. line of East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition to 79th Avenue California Street to Main Street 41st Avenue to 200 feet South 3zd Street to 53rd Avenue Main Street to Hughes Avenue Yanorama Avenue to Korizon Drive Panqx�aa Avenue to Horizon Drive Horizon Drive to 300 feet South I I .:OtYVk +7JC ��x�� 1 k St. 1973-1 � 1973-2 IMSAS) �_. I� � ' , ' ' � 15. Panorama Avenue 16. GibsalCar Road 17. Pilot Avenue 18. Somazt Road 19. 5th Street 20. 66th Avenue Main Street to 3rd Street . , Roman Road to 550 feet West Main Street to Roman Road- 49th Aveuue to Ranorama Avenue 63rd Avenue to 64th Avenue Pierce Street to Channel Road 8. Additional Curbina Imvrovement (Under Proieet St 1973-1) 1. , Beaeh .Street 77th Avemie to 79th Avenue ;�' '' 2. Slm 9treet 77th Avenue to 79th Avenue ` � ; � `�� -3. Ma3a Street • �`�}" 77th Avemie to 79th Avenue 4. T9th Avenue 5. 69th Avewia Beech Street to Main Street Stinson Avemie to 1300 feet West C. Streeta Under Proiect St 1973-2 (MSAS) '., 1. 74th pvenue Beech Street West to Alley and Main Street to Unfversity Avenue ' � , ' � ' , ' ' 2. Main Streat 3. 83rd Avenue SSTIMATED COST . . . . 79th Aveciue to 83rd Avenue Main Street to University Avenue . • . . . . • • . . . . . . . . .$ 797,575.00 TaAT THE AREA PROPQSSp TO g$ ASSESSED POR SAID IMPHOVEMENTS IS AS FOLLOWS: For Construction Item above ------------------------------------- All of the lsnd abutting upon said streets named above and all lsnde within, adjacent and abutking thereto. Ali of said land ko be asaeosed proportionately acGording to the benefita received by such impTOVements. ThaC should the Councii proeeed with said improvements they will eonsider each separate improvements, except as hereafter otherwise provided by the Cauacil ail under the following authpzity� to-wit: Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chaptex k29 and laws amendatory theseof, and in eonformity with the City Charter, ' L1ATEp THIS 2ND �1Ay pF pCTOBER . 197,2� gY ORDBR OF THE CITY COUNCTL. ' ATTEST: CITy G7,EgR -;�Iax�in C. Bruqsell MAYOR - rank G, Liebl Publiah: Nov�er 1, 197? �vwoher 8, 7.972 2 OFFICH OF THE CITY M(�NAGER FRIALEY, MINNESpTA November 2, 1972 MEMO T0: THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT; AUTHORIZATION FOR MULTI-EMPLOYER BARGAINING WITH REGARD TO POLICE AND FIREMEN FOR THE CI�'1' OF FRIDLEY On October 27, 1972, Mr. Brunsell attended a meeting of the Metropolitan Area Manager's AssoCiation, At that mee[ing it was the concensus of the Managers present that they would like their cities to begin multi-employer bargain�ng with police unions f.or suburban cities in the Twin City area. This ie a similar approach to the way negotiations are handled with Operating Engineers Union Local �k49 at the present time. This approach has worked out very well for the following reasons; 1) There is a uniform pay scale�for like positions among cities in ' the suburban 1Win City area, thereby eliminating the pro6lem of whipsawing salary schedules among the cities. , 2) There is a conservation of time and effort on the part of the employers; there can be professional expertise on the employers bargaining side which would be unable if each city were to negotiate separately on its own. ' , ' ' ' 3) The Council still would retain the right to accept, modify or reject the contracts that are negotiated on the area-wide level. 4) Certain local iasues which are unique to a particular city can still be worked out by the city's negotiating team, but the general contract is developed using the expertise available. I 6elieve the same above advantages apply to police negotiations as well. .. �'he Council has previously approved this concept by passage of Resolution No. 56-1971, which is attached. This resolution, however, designated the Anoka County Section of the City Manager's Association instead of the Metro- ' politan Area Maabger's Aasociation to do the negotiating. There is also some queation whethez this was merely an annual resolution and would expire with t�e completion of the 1972 contract. The Metropolitan Area Manager's ,yssociation is not asking for authorization ' �o negptiate fring¢ beaefits which will be on a local basis after agreement has been reached on the uiaster cantract. We will st�,ll carry an negotiations , � TH� MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL -2- NOVEMfiER 2� 1972 for fringe benef�ts including the pension fund financing, which we are negot�ating right now wlth the Frid]ey Police Officer's Pension Association. I would xecommrsnd that the City Council approve the proposed Resolution Which wi11 then allqw us to participate wlth other cities on a multi-employer b�rgainj.ng arrangeo�nt, you will note that in the committee structure, there i� a rep�esentative from each one of the counties, and Malcolm Watson, City I�nager of Columbia Heights, is serving as the negotiating team member of Anoka County. GRD/ms Epclosures a Very respectfully, � ^ I '�-�""'� ' Gerald R. Davis City Manager 2A ' � � ' T0: �J FROM; CITY QF FRIDLEY MfMORANpUM GERALD R. DAVIS, GITY MANAGER MARYIN C. BRUNSELL, FINANCf DIRECTOR SUBJECT: GITY MANAGER'S MEETIN6 OF OCTOBER 26. 1972 , pATE: OCTOBER 27, 9972 , It was the concensus of the managers present at the meeting he,ld at noon today that they would start joint negotiations for the Police Departments effective at once for the 1973 contraCt year. This would be on the same basis as the 49's are now handled. 1_ I � It w�s brought out that each city manager still has to take the recomnended master agrLement negotiated by the City Manager's Committee back to the City Council fpr approval. The Couneil has the right to accept or reject the recommendation of the committee. It was also bmught out that each individual city stil] has to negotiate , some of the fringe and other benefits not covered by the master agreement much the same as they have done in the past for the 44's. ' The comnittee is composed of Donald D. Herrman, Bwoklyn Park; Jack Irving, Crystal; Malcom Watson, Columbia Heights; and Thomas F. Lewcock, New Brighton, Ramsey County. I It was suggested that any comnunity involved in the joint negotjations from this point on have Karen Olsen set up the meetings with the union representative. This includes Mr. Pr9frel's union as well as Local No. 32p. This means that ' we would do no more negotiating with our Police Department other than individual community items which would be settled after the main contract language has been taken care of. As you know, we have started negotiating with Mr. Prifrel ' relat9ng to the overall contract language and have used basically the same format as would be used by the Manager's Committee so far as I know. I assume thdt you are in agreement with this unless I hear otherwise from you. � Attached is Resolution No. 56-1971 relating to joint negotiations. , � 1� ' 2B ;;.'� � - 2 c ; aE80LUTI0N 56-1971 A RESQLUTION AUTHORIZING MULTI-EMpLOYER APPAMCH WITH REGARD TO POLICE AND FIRE- I�N BARGAINING FOR TF� 1972 CONTRACT YEAR i�REAS, a conaiderable amount of time can be spent on bargaining �esiiona for policemen and giremen; and W�RBAS, the nature of the job of Policemen and Firemen ia such that t6a vork performed in one community ia very aimilar to the work performed ia the neighboring community; and . i1�RBA3. it is desirable to have pay acalea eimilar for aimiiar type vork in the metropolitan area; HOiT T�SEFORE, BE IT RE9DLVED by the City Council of Fridley that �. The, Anoka County Section of the Suburban Section of City Manager's Associatioa ia hereby authorized to act as the bargaining agent for the City of Fridley 1n negotiations vith Mail Order Retail Departmeat Store and Warehouse Bmployeea, Local Union �149 and International Association of Firefighters, Local Union #1986 beginning with�the 1972 coatract; aad B. That thia policy will remain in effect until rescinded by the Council o£ the City of Fridley C. The City Council shall retain the right to accept or reject any or all proposed settlements. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 3RD , DAY OP_ t+mY , 1971 Jack 0. Kirkham, Mayor ATTEST � liervia C. Brunsell, Ci,ty Cler : RESOLUTION NO A RESpLUTION AUTHORIZING MULTI-EMPLOYER APPROACH WITH [tEGARD TO POLICE AND FIREMEN BARGAINING FOR THE 1973 CONTRACT YEAR AND FUTURE YEARS WHEREAS, A considerable amount of time can be spent on bargaining sessions for Policemen and Firemen; and WHEREAS, the nature of the job of Policemen and Firemen is such that the work performed in one coamunity is very similar to the work performed in the neighboring community; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to have pay scales similar for similar type work in the metropolitan area; NOW THEREFORE, BE ZT RESOLVED by the City Council of Fridley that A. The Metropolitan Area Management Association is hereby suthorized to act as bargaining agent for the City of Fridley in negotiations with Mail Order Retail Department Store and Warehouse Employees, Local Union 149, or such union or association that may represent the majority of sworn Policemen — in the future, and International Aasociation of Firefighters, Local Union 1986 beginning with the 1973 contract and continuing thereafter. B. That this policy will remain in effect until rescinded by the Council of the City of Fridley. C. The City Council shall retain the right to accept or reject any or all proposed settlements. , ADOPTED BY TF� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS � , ' OF ATT'EST: 1972. IMARVIN C. BRUNSELL, CITY CLERK , ' � ` `V t� � DAY � � ,\, � �� 1 �, � ; � � � �. v 2D RESOLUTION NQ. -1972 A RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LOTS ENTIRELY, REQUESTING EASEMENTS ON CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LOTS TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND REQUESTING A DEED TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY ON ONE TAX FORFEIT LOT AND PUTTING A HOLD ON THREE TAX FORFEIT LOTS. � WHEREAS, The City of Fridley has reviewed the list of Tax Forfeit lots, sent it by the County Auditor, WHEREAS, After reviQw, it has been determined to put no hold on most of the lots, ` NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the following 7isted lots are hereby considered not needed by the City of Fridley and released by the City for sale by the County of Anoka, subject to the provisions of MS 282.08 which provides that the net proceeds of the sale shall be apportioned by the County Auditor as follows: (7) Such portion as may be required to pay any amounts included in the appraised value under section 282.01, subdivision 3, as representing increased value due to any public improvement made after forfeiture of such parcel to the state, but not exceeding the amount certified by the clerk of the municipality, shall be apportioned to the municipal subdivision entitled thereto; {2) Such portion of the remainder as may be required to discharge any special assessment chargeable against such parcel for drainage or other purpose whether due or deferred at the time of forfeiture, shall be apportioned to the municipal subdivision entitled thereto; .-.. 1!SSESSMENTS ASSESSMENTS PRIOR TO AFTER ASSESSMENTS YEAR LEGAL FORFEITURE FORFEITURE TOTAL FORFEITED Pt of Lot 5, Aud Sub #94, Pdreel �620 S Pt of Lot 4, Aud Sub #108 Parcel �440 Lot 6, Aud Sub #108, Parcel #520 Pt of Lot 11, Aud Sub #129, Parcel #720 Lot 1, Block 1, Chouinard Terr, Parcel #10 Lot 2, Block 1, Chouinard Terr. Parcel #100 Lots 9& 10, Block 5, City View, Parcel 11770 Lot 22, Block 10, Donnay's l,akeView Manor Addition, Parcel 414360 Lots 39, 4Q, 41, and 42, Block 6, Fridiey Park. Parcel #4�20 1,071.56 A,776.00 3,895.20 500.13 2,494.24 1,682.49 1,272.64 4,976.27 2,469.32 $ ---- 273.57 6,063.25 $ 1,071.56 Sept 1970 4,776.00 Sept 1970 3,895.20 Oct 1969 773.70 Oct 1964 2,494.24 Oct 1971 1,682.49 Oct 1969 1,272.64 Oct 1971 11,039.52 Sept 1963 2,469.32 Oct 1971 n =' ' Resolution No. -1972 j N Page 2 , ASSESSMENTS PRIOR TO , LEGAL fORFEITURE Lot S, Block 19, Fridley Park, , Parcel #3940 Lots 28, 29 & 30, Block 3 Hamilton's Add to Mechanicsville, Parcels �900 and #910 , Lot 27, Block 7, Hamilton's Add to Mechanicsville, Parcel #2100 ' Lot 16, Block'16, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Parcel #4730 Lot 22, Block 16, Hamilton's , Addition to Mechanicsville, Parcel #4790 � Lots 23 and 24, Block 16. ' Hamilton's Add to Mechanicsville, Pdreel #4810 Pt of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 1 • Hillcrest Additian, Parcel #180 Lot 17, Block 1 Hillcrest Add, Parcel �480 ' Lot 18, Block 1, Hillcrest Add, Parcel #500 Lot 3, Block 1, Hitzeman Add, ' Parcel #1$0 Lot 11, Block 4, Hyde Park, Parcel #660 1 Lots 14 and 15, Block 4, Hyde Park: Percel N740 Lot 27, Block 10, Hyde Park, Parcel #4520 � Lot 30, Block 11, Hyde Park, Parcel #5300 Lot 19, Block 24, Hyde Park, , Parcel #8790 Lots 1 and 2, Block 32, Hyde Park, Parcel #9580 Lot 10, Bloek 32, Hyde Park. ' Parcel #9670 Pt of Lot 2, Lucia Lane Add Parcel #100 ' Lot 6, Block Marian Hills, Parcel �240 Lot 13, Block 1, Marian Hills, ' Parcel #520 �ot 14, Block 1, Marian Hills, Parcel N560 �ot 15, B14Gk l, Marian Hills, , Parcel �6Q0 L��: 76, BJock 1, Marian Hi11S, Parcel N6A0 , $ 1,072.58 2,207.67 622.57 924.90 742.38 1,344.88 243.71 289.55 2,660.12 625.87 1,298.14 579.30 621.19 882.79 2,950.81 719.26 966.34 1,394.21 2,211.45 1,832.64 1>933.42 1933.9� ASSESSMENTS AFTER FORFEITURE $ ---- 1,487.50 159.36 138.b6 1,61b.65 219.48 529.15 140.13 344.60 137.82 ASSESSMENT YEAR TOTAL fORFEITED $ 1,072.58 Nov 1962 3,695.17 1967-1968 622.57 Oct 1971 1,084.27 Nov 1962 880.94 Oct 1964 1,344.88 Aug 1967 ---- Oct 1969 243.71 Aug 1966 289.55 Aug 1966 4,276.77 Oct 1965 845.35 Sep 1963 1,827.29 Oct 1964 719.43 Sep 1963 965.79 1953 1,020.61 Jul 1962 2,950.81 Sep 1970 719.26 Sep 1970 966.34 Sep 1970 1,394.21 1968 2,211.95 1968 1,832.64 1968 1,933.92 1968 1,933.92 1968 I , Heso1ution Nu. -i��L Page 3 , ASSESSMENT5 PRIOR TO LEGAL FORFEITURE , Pt of Lot 12, Block 1, Marian Hills, Parcel #480 $ 1,682.86 ' Pt of Lot 12, Block 1, Marian Hil1s, Parce1 #5Q0 ' Lot 1> 81ock 1, Marian Hills 2nd Addition, Parcel #10 , Lot 8, Block 1, Marian Hills 2nd Add�t9on, Parcel #280 , Lot 9, Block 1, Marian Hills ' 2nd Addition, Parce1 #3f'.0 Lot 2, Block l, Marian Hills , 2nd Addition, Parcel #40 Lot 3, Block 1, Marian Hills ' 2nd Addition. Percel #80 Lot 4, Block 1> Marian Hills 2nd Addition, ' Parcel #120 Lot 2, Block 2, Marian Hills 2nd Addition, , Parcel #$40 Lot 9, Block 2, Marian Hills 2nd Addition, Parcel #1120 , Outlot 2, Melody Manor 2nd Add, Parcel #2980 Lot 4, Block 1, Me}oland Lakeview, ' Pdreel #150 Lot 6, Block 1, Meloland Lakeview, Parcel #250 ' Pt of Lot 15, Moore Lake Highlands ' lst Addition, Parcel #300 Lot 1, 67ock 1> Oak �rnve Addition ' to Fridley Park, Pareel S10 Lot 19. Bloek 2, Oak Grove Addition , to Fridley Park, Parcel #340 Lot 12, Block 1, Onaway, ' Parcel �120 Lot 21, BlOCk 1, Onaway, Farce1 #210 L,pt �2, Block 1, Onaway> , P�rcel N220 L• : �3, Block 1> Onaway, Parcel #23Q 1 4,231.25 2,607.59 2,587.92 2,557.97 2,554.82 2,558.60 2,492.25 2,486.71 2,847.84 3,002.39 441.81 632.94 1,474.14 70.19 b9,6� 69.69 70.34 ASSESSMENTS AFTER FORFEITURE $ ---- ---- � 1>178.80 1,153.2Q 1,153.2Q � �144•$� ASSESSMENT YEAR TOTAL F�RFFTT� $ 1,682.86 Oct 1971 ---- Sep 1970 4,231.25 Sep 1970 2,607.59 Sep 1970 2,587.92 Sep 1970 2,557.97 Sep 1970 2,554.82 Sep 1970 2,558.60 Sep 1970 2,492.25 Sep 1970 2,486.71 Sep 1970 - Oct 1969 2,847.84 $ep 1970 3,OQ2.39 Sep 1970 441.81 Oct 1964 632.94 Oct 1971 1,474.14 Aug 1967 1,248.99 Jul 1962 1,222.89 Aug 1967 1,222.89 Aug 1967 1,171.22 Jul 1962 3B , Resolution No. -1972 3 � Page 4 , LEGAL Lot 13, B7oCk 2, Parkview Oaks First Addit�on Parcel #800 Lot 15, Block 2, Plymouth, Parcel #920 Lot 30, Block 2, Plymouth, Parcel #1220 Lot 15, Block 3, Plymouth, Parcel #1520 Lot 30, Block 8, Plymouth, Parcel #4825 Lot 11, Block 10, Plymouth, Parcel �5605 Lot 16, Block 11, Plymouth, Parael #6305 Lot 45, Block A. River View Heights, Anoka County, Parcel 5230 Lot 56, BloCk D, River View Heights, Anpka County, Parcel #835 Lot 57, Block D, River View Heights, Anoka County, Pdreel #840 Lots 31 & 32, Block J, River View Heights, Anoka County, Parcel #2530 Lots $& 9, Block 0, River View Meigh�s, Anpka County, Parcels #3370 & #3375 Lots 29 & 3p, Block S, River View Heights, Anoka County, Parcels #4335 &4340 Lots 33, 34, 35 and 36, Blpck T, River View Heights, Anoka County Pdreels #4635, #4640, #4645 dnd #4650 Lots 37 and 38, Block V, River View Heights, Anoka Cpunty, Pdreel #5160 Lots 41, 42, 43, and 44, Block V, River View Heights, Anoka County, Parcel #5190 Lots 16 and i7, Block Y, River View Heights, Anoka County, • Parcel �5640 and k5645 Pt of Lots 1 and 2> elock 3. 5haff�r's Sub #1, Pdreel #450 Pt pfi Lot 7, dlock 4, Shaffer'S S�:'-ti;vision 1�1, Parcel #830 ASSESSMENTS PRIOR TO FORFEITURE $ 1,498.75 679.31 452.25 685.19 371.37 837.84 1,523.00 517.04 368.50 1,102.26 1,043.98 1,627.54 1,043.Q5 2,594.00 1,312.80 3,125.02 15.84 4>q40-87 2,028.67 ASSESSMENTS AFTER ASSESSMENT FDRFEITURE TOTAL _ � ---- 440.56 205.50 468.50 1,223.06 .,.-- 1'EAR FORFEITED S 1,498.75 1968 679.31 Sep 1970 452.25 Mar 1965 685.19 Sep 1970 371.37 Mar 1965 1,278.40 Nov 1962 1,523.00 Oct 1971 722.54 Aug 1966 368.50 Oct 1971 1,102.26 Oct 1971 1,512.48 Aug 1966 1,627.54 Aug 1967 1,043.05 Sep 1970 2,594.00 Oct 1971 1,312.80 Oct 1971 3,125.02 Oct 1971 1,238.90 Aug 1958 4,040.87 Oct 1971 2.028.67 Oct 1971 , Resolution No. -1972 3 D Page 5 ' , ' ' ' , I , [l I ' I , I , I ' I ' I ' � I ' I , I ' LEGAL Lot 4, 5, and 6, Block 3 Spring 6rook Park, Anoka County Parcels #360, #365,and #370 Lot 3i and 32, Block 4, Spring Brook Park, Anoka County Parcel #6$0 Lot 21, Block 6. Spring Brook Pdrk, A�oka County, Parcel �1055 Lots 53 and 54, Block 6, Spring Brook Park, Anoka County, Parcels #1215 and #1220 Lots 26 and 27, Block 7, Spring Brook Park, Anoka County> Parcel #]355 Lots 30 and 31, Block 7, Spring Brook Park, Anoka County, Parcel �f1370 Lots 2$ and 26, Block 11, Spring Brook Park, Artoka County, Parcel #2115 Lots 5 and 6, Block 12, Spring Brook Rark, Anoka County, Parcel #2255 Lot 11, Block 12, Spring Brook Park. Anoka County> Parcel #2280 Lot 12, Block 1> Spring Lake Park Lakeside> Parcel ;Y�F80 Lot 13, Block 1, Spring Lake Park Lakeside, Parcel ii520 Lot 14, B1oCk 1, Spring Lake Park l,akeside, Rarcel �560 Pt of Lot 8, Block 1, Spring Valley Additiqn, Parcel #320 Lot 5, Block 1, Stinson Blvd. Addition, Parcet #200 Lot 6, Block 1, Stinson Blvd. Addition, ' Parcel H250 ASSESSMENTS PRTOR TO FORFEITURE $ 1,747.03 1,156.74 903.11 2,837.60 719.02 1,056.31 1,101.78 1 ,278.41 11.94 99.19 3,207.93 99.53 522.75 439.85 534.98 ASSESSMENTS YEAR AfTER ASSESSMENT FORFEITURE TOTAL FORFEITED. $ 841.94 676.78 450.29 68.70 211.88 944.40 913.03 1,146.51 6,10.3.83 2,443.90 5,522.23 2,525.68 $ 2,588.97 Aug 1967 1,833.52 Aug 1967 1,353.40 Jul 1962 2,837.60 Sep 1970 787.72 Aug 1967 1,268.19 Oct 1969 2,046.18 Au9 1967 2,791.44 Aug 1967 1,158.45 Sep 1957 6,243.D2 Sep 1957 5,651.83 Sep 1963 5,621.76 Sep 1957 3>048.43 Sep 1963 439.85 Sep 1970 534.98 Sep 1970 ' Resolution No. -l�rZ 3 e Page 6 , �E IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Council of the City of Fridley desires , easements over a portion of the following lots for streets and utilities and therefore, the following portions pf lots should be withheld from sale: LEGAL A Utility easement being part of Lot 1, Block 6, Fridley Park, Parcel #20 as follows: ASSESSMEN�S PRIOR TO FORFEITURE (LOTS 1 & 2) $ 1,954.05 ASSESSMENTS AfTER FORFEITURE $ ---- ASSESSMENT YEAR TOTAL FORFEITED $ 1,954.05 Oct 1971 Caimencing at the N W ly Corner of Lot 1, Block 6, Fridley Park; thence South along the Westerly line of Lot 1 a distance of 25', thence, Easterly at right angles to the West line of �ot 1 a distance of 55' more or less to its intersection with the Northerly line of Lot 1; thence Westerly along the North line of Lot 1, Block 6, Fridley to the point af carmencement. �,' �,a�"� p Street and Uti 1 i ty Easement being part of Lot 6, Block 32, Hyde Park, Parcel #9630 a5 follows: $ 719.26 $----- . � 719.26 Sep 1970 The Southerly 17' of Lot 6, Block 32, Hyde Park Addition. (out of Parcel #930) , A Street and Utility Easement being part of Lot 9, Block 2, Spring Valley Addition, ' Parcel # 1140 __ as follows: $ 3,599.79 $ - $ 3,599.79 Sep 1970 The Southerly 25' of Lot 9, Block 2, Spring Valley Addition. (out of Parcel #1140) BE IT FURTHER RESOLUED, That the City Council of the City of Fridley requests the County to withhold from Tax Forfeit Sales the following lots: Lot 8, Block 14, Hami.lton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Parcel �{4060 Lot 9, Block 14, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Parcel �4070 Lot 10, Block 14, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, Parcel #4080 $ 787.22 $ 650.76 824.00 604.96 824.00 604.96 $ 1,437.98 Jul 1962 1,428.96 Jul 1962 1,428.96 Ju] 1962 I , Resolut�on No. _-1y72 Page 7 ' BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED> Thdt the City Council of the City of Fridley desires to ' hold the following lot for City purposes, and the County Auditor is requested to withhold from sale and cause the State to deed said lot to tne City of Fridley for Storm Water Drainage Sump: 3F ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENTS PRIOR TO AFTER ASSESSMENT YEAR LEGqL FORFEITURE fORFEITURE TOTAL FORFEITED Lot 4, Block 1, Uan Cleaves Addition, Parcel #220 $ 103.10 $---- $ 103.10 Oct 1971 Lot 4, Block i, Van Cleaves Addition, Parcel #220 (Subject to 5' utility easement over W 5' and 10' utility easement as shown on Plat) (Ex. N. 140' of Lot 4, Ex. E'ly 2') (Ex. E. 2'). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THT� DAY OF , 1972. MAYOR - FRANK LIEBL ATTEST: CITY GLERK - MARVIN C. RUNSELI �.1 � I1 CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM , T0: GERALD R. DAVIS, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL , FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, FINANCE DIRECTOR ' SUBJECT: RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LOTS FOR SALE ' DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 1972 ' The attached resolution would have the affect of releasing ' certain tax forfeit lots for sale. The resolution shows the ' amount of asse5sments against the property prior to forfeiture and those assessments levied after forfeiture. It is the intent of the resolution that all special assessments be collected at the time of sale and not be spread over a period of years. The resolution also lists certain lots that the City desires to withhold from sale temporarily, some lots over which the City requests an easement and one lot which the City asks that it be deeded to the City at this time. 0 3G i� May 5, 1969 May 16, 1969 June 9, 1469 Juiy 3, 1964 SEQUENCE U"r a?VENTS HYDE PARK CIkCLE F;;(nd DEVELOPMENT �esolut:i..n;� ;d71-1969 �. Feeuesti.��g iKinae�aoi:a Hi;:;hway i3epartment concu:retict £or traffic p�atr_ern, ;,etter i�.��n Homer Ankrsm to Mr, xux'ril:, Di� rricC Engineer. 'roposed nccess c,:.;ideratier. - �.r.actio�: t::: ;_.[tec oi :�tay 1.:;, 196�. i�?emc irom Engineer [o City Maoaoex - i:aaroc.°ment roe��h �ost estLmates. Ju1y 21, 1969 Kesolutioc �k12S-195y - Calling Yub13c Hearing c� ,,°*_�t<�i�= i.mt�rovenen ts . September 4, 1959 Ye�ti.tio❑ against slip ofY. November 3, 1464 Resolution ?f194-�i969 - Ordering improveme,��.:: -�-,�;i final pluns Yor 1970-4. February 10� 1970 Memo to City Attorney from City �;nginee:.� rega:�dii:; acquiring property for :lip off and circle floc��. August 24, 1970 August 31, 1970 Memo [o Ci[y Manager - Discussion „n aeyuisiiiu�:t of easements. Letter to Norm Osterby from City Manager - reqae:7ting proposed access consideration. September 29, 1970 Letter to City 1'ugineer from Mr. Osterb� - na�� in pc,sition to relinquish highway right of way. s September 30, 1970 Letter tc .,r. Osterby - requesting right ok ;a;�y �- a:ked fcr fencing delay. October 2, 1970 Letter to Frank I.ieb1 t�_iing him of di.£fi�!iiz.y i.❑ uhtaininb right of way for West Service L'rive. January 27, 1971 Letter to Don Manley, Ri�ht of Way Engi.iee.r - reque.,�ing access approval again. May 14, 1972 Letter to Don Manley, Right of Wap Fn=,ir.eer - re<:,i�EStir.g access apnroval for slip off. 4 �� 4N Sequence of Events Hyde Park Circie Flow Development Page 2 July 10, 1972 Petition r+,eeived requesting rescission oi Phase ltao of Ci.rc�le 'rlow Plan. in Hyde Park adopted by Resolution ;k194-1969, November 3, 19G9. (Administration instructed tr, pre€�are �ppropri.:ar.e resolution ior passa„e by� Cooncil fos� �tz� second pha5e � f the ��irale Plow Plan. � Sep[ember 6, !972 MEme irpm <.^,ity Engsn_•�-�:- > Cita M naf;ex' �^.?-r3ing probLema invoLvecY i.n impr�� g Wesr ' -, ii,.c koad, September 29, 1972 Memc trom City Manage: fo .Mayor and Citq i;our.C�i �tatinQ a new assessment hearing woul.d be required :>eeause �..��.,t is conside:ably more than wnat was eriginally proposed. pctober 2, 1972 Study meeting on subject between staff :irv1 Go,�ncil to indicate the State right-ot-way apparently is not , available aad the original cost estimates ha✓e gone up 200% to 25U% (See minutesa€ October 2, 1972 ��nncil Meeting). MEMO T0: MEMO FROM: MEMO DATE: MEMO NUMBER: , ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' ' � ' ' , ' � . I•,i Gerald R, Davis, City Manager Nasim M. Qureshi, City Engineer September 6, 1972 CM #72^27 T.H. #47 Wast Service Road Construction For Cirele Flow In Hyde Park When you came back from your vacation at the end of July, 1972 Y discussed with you the instructions from the City Council that the City Administration should proceed with the improvement o� the T.I-i. #47 WesY Service Road for the Proposed Circle Flow for the Hyde Park area. We also reviewed the site in person and I enumerated a number of problems involved with the proposed improvement. I a.iso gave you a brief summary of the total process the City went through regarding the rezoning £or the Hyde Park area and the development of the T.H. �47 slip off and Circle Flow Traffic Pattern proposed over the last 3 years. Our previous City Manager, Homer R. Ankrum, was working with the Minnes,ota Highway Department in regard to this traffic pattern proposal. The original proposal for the service road was based on the premise that we would get a minimum of 8 feet of right of way :rom the Highway Department to instali the service road. Since 1969 there has been a change in the District Engineer at the Minnesota Highway Department, District #5 in Golden Valley and after that their response to our request fox right of way from the Minnesota Highway Department lands, even on a temporary basis, has been qui�e negative. Tn 1971 the City decided that it should proceed with the slip off right away to open up the area for commercial development and hold off on the development of the service road €or a number of reasons: 1. because of the inability of the City to get right of way from the Highway Department 2. when the commercial development comes into this general area their development plan might negate the need o£ a service road q 3. exCessiva co5t of the development of the service road and also leav�ng a naxrow siri� between 3rd Street and the service road for deveiopment. The C3ty Council heard a xequest at their meeting of June 19, 1972 £rom two ex-property owners in the Hyde Park area far eliminating the T.H. #47 service road po�tion of the �a►provement so that escrow mQnies to the•impr4vement cvuld be zeleased to Ehe people who had sold their 4� ' ' CM M72-27 Page 2 I, properties in the area: ' At their meeting of July 10, 1972, the City Council received Petition #1Z-1972 signed by a majority of the people in the area asking the Council to rescind Phase II of the Circle Flow Plan in Hyde Park. , However, the City Council chose to instruct the administration to proceed with the iraprove�ent. , , , As I gointed aut to you earlier in my meeting with you, two factors have greatly affected the nature and cost of the improvement as originally envisioned: 1. Refusal of the Minnesota Highway Department to r�lease some of the right of way for serviee road use. I, 2. Property owners objections against putting in the service road at this time and in turn causing difficulties in negotiations with these people and eventually maybe needing condemnation. ' Unless the (:ity can pursuade the Nfinnesota Highway Department to release the right of way for service road construction, which at this time seems highiy improbable, the only choices available are: ' ' ' A. To delay the construction of the road pattern in this area until dictated by proposed commercial construction in this area: B. To acquire the needed right of way from the property along the West side of the service road for which the costs will he excessive because of the number of trees and structures in the new right of way and the area next to the roadway for which the City would have to pay damages. ' The estimatad cost of the Circle Flow Pattern and service road from 58th Avenue to 59th Arenue is about $17,000, but the easement costs could run as high as $�Q. These would include: ' I , I ' ' 1. about S,OOU sq.ft. of roadway easements 2. about 3,000 sq.ft. of slope easements 3. 650 ft. of State Highway fence relocation 4. 110 ft. of private fence relocation 5. 25 trees - damage payment and removal 6. 1 garage - damage payment . ' 7. cOAd6mn82ioIi costS , � �� ; � J, � �� ` n, � ,� � � ``1. . �`� t � � � I j �) 4C1 CM �72-27 Page 3 The estimated cost of the Circle Flow Pattern and service xoad from 59th Avenue to 60th Avenue is about $15,000 whereas right of way acquisition and dama$� cost to property owners could run over $41,000. These wauld include: 1. about 4,000 sq.ft. of roadway easements 2. about 2,400 sq.ft. of siope ease�ents 3. 25 ft. of'private fence relocation 4. 7 trees - damage payment and removal 5. 2 garages - damage payments 6, Muggli Manufacturing building damage cost 7. Condemnation costs As is evident, the right of way and damage costs could almost run twice the cost of the service road improvement. If the improvement is installed on this basis, this could put a burden on Hyde Park property owners three times as muCh as the additional assessments which have already been levied £or the improvement of the slip off at a cost of $31,521.04. I feel silly in prop'osing that kind of cost be put on the property owners in this area for this improvement. Also, if the Council does propose to ge ahead with the improvement on this basis, I feel the City would have to hald another Public Hearing as the total cost would £ar exceed the original estimate given to the people. C. Another mexhod could be to cul de sac the service road a2 the North end nexi to �he T.H, #47 slip off. The cost for this would be $35,0009 almost 1/3 of the cost of the Revised Circle Flow Plan. I am also submitting the pertinent material from Che Engineering Department files regarding this item for your review. ' I hape that the proper course of action in res��t to this mavter ` Car;: be charted out by the City as soon as possible. t' ' + . � (� � 1�� f�: � r�ti. � i• l. �'«��s�; ' NASIM . QURESH.i, P.E. City Engineer-Director of Planning ' LJ cc: City Attorney NQ/r,j � 4ll ' Pa�� 3 4 E REGULAR COUNCiL MEETING OF OCTORE:+: 2, S�i1 I' , I ' I ' �I I ' I ' I ' I ' I , I , iy wi17.3n� to take spme, but not all. hecaase ubvipusly Mr. Filister cannot b$ tl^eated differently than anyone elsa i.n the City. He said it is his feeling that these things should be resolved and that they are all inter- cORnected. These are the things thdt wgre discussed whan he met with them and Mr. Pilister's attorney said "fine"� but Mr. Filister said "no". Mr• Filister said that he still could not see where one affects the othar. h8yor I.lebl said that he could see no connection either, He wou?d like to see the sur�ey approv�d, but he stressed that the intersection problem must be resolved. Nayor Liebl asked the C�ty Attorney if there was any reason the City should aot acaept tAe sur�ey. The City Attorney replied ehat he had not seen the registei`ed Iand survey, but if it meets the Statute requirements, then it should he all right. Mr. Filister added that it was prepared by 5uburban Engineering, the City's Consulting Engineers. Councilman Mittelstadt asked if the Administration shouid review this registered land survey before approval. Mayor Lieb�, said that he couYd see no reason for that, it has been before the Council many times. MOTION by Councilman Mittelstadt to raceive R.L.S, 1j69-OU, and if appropriate after revieW Ly the Administration, approve the survey. Seconded by Councilman Utter. �� Counciiman Breider said he would assume by this motion, that if the survey papers are physically in order, the survey is approved? Councilman Mitteistadt answered yes. � UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE, Utter, Hittelstadt and Liebl voting aye, Breider ' voting nay> Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried. E1don Schmedeke: Hyde Park Circle Flow Plan: � , Mr. Sctimedeke said that on July 1D, 1972, at a regular Councii tieeti�g, there was some discussion regarding the second phase of the Circle Flow plan for Hyde Park and Councilman Breider questioned if the proper procedure was not to ' Dring back a resolution for further authorization and the Cit}� Attosney had .d ' ' ' ' ' �eplied yes. He questioned xhy this has not been done. Mayor Liebl sax `that thry City Attorney and the Admi�isiration are arra�e that they were in- Stroct4d by the Council to proceed, hrnrever, there have been some rather difficult developments and the Council just met tonight with the Staff to discuss xhat should be done. The Council and the Staff are trying to find out whdt k3nd of an agxeement the former City Manager, Homer Ankrum, had with the iiighrray Uepartment 3n �gard to the Circle Flow pattern. The x°e�oning of this whole area was contingent upon acguiring the right of way farom th� State Highway Aepartment, which they did agrEe to at one 5ime. The plan was for txo sRages, the first s+as to move the �fence and put in the slip-off. This has bsen done and ihe geople assessed according to benefits rec�ived. The Courlc�l received a prepared analysis tonight of t4g groblera tc� .ate and an explanation of what jg h4l�ing tRe progress up. The i�nproveme=., cc;ts �l,so have Fisen cpr�siderably sinee 1969 arad that along w�ith unantic�gated S�qqu$p�,tion Gosf6 wou�d probably.require another publie hearing. The eost of doinY this rrojeet has risen �bout 2QQ$ to ?50$. The paople would have to be acquainted Kith titese riert #a4ts before the work �; $}�� in. This would he , an extreme burden on these people. 1 , , ' ' ' ' '! . t ' ' ' ' ' ' � . ' , ' ' ' • ' RF,GULAR COUNCIL ME£TING OF OCT9BER �, +`3`72 PAGE 4 ltp. Sch�deke said that it seamed members of the Staff are dragging thair fset, everyone knex the aosts would go up. Both the slip-off and the Circle Flow Were part of one project. He said his attorney, 3n 1970, informed him that sinco a resolution was passed, that was the way 'st was going in. There cannot be commercial without the Circle Flow. If this project can go so far xiEhout completing it� it seems someone is in error. He said his taxes have goao up because it is commercial property. He could not understand wbY people �eese etalling on this project. e mancilmati•Utter explained that r�hen Nr. Ankrum was dealing with the Highway Dppartment, there was an a�eemerat ma�e� 5ince 1969 thnre has been a change in the District Engineer at the Mianeso�� 1�;.vi�w�y Depar�ment, District #5, and afteT the change their response to iridley;s rrequ��t fo� aig�:t c�f way has been aegative. If the improvement were to go in as thin�s st��nd a�u+a� ali the right of xay aould have to come from the property awners. This woul:i c:ut down on the eunount of property left,�and if negotietions were unsuccessful and r.�n� demnations were required. it would also be very expensive, M.^, Schmedek� s�id tt�at if the State has w3thdrawn their approval, then tr�� City,should foat the bill. The Hyde Park people were promised this at or.A time, but this has just gone on and on. He said he has had buyers for his pror :�"ty, but he cannot tell them What will be happening with the roadways. . ltayor Lieb7. said that as things are na+, all the right of way would have to be acquired from the west eide of the service road, this would ruin Mr. Schmedeke's yroperty. As he saw it, that right of way must be acquired irom the State, and he tt�ought there was a letter of cormnitment from the Highway Department to Mr. Ankrum. Councilman Mittelstadt added that Mr. Schmedeke and Mr. Muggli, as the #ti+o nwst affected property owners, will be called in to discuss this pro- blem. Mr. Schmedeke co�ented that he did not think it was right or fair that 4his has been going on ior so long. . The CiCy Manager said that he had come into this long involved process in the widdle, but he has become familiar with the background and he assured Mr. Schmedeka that no one on the Staff is trying to torpedo this project. As has tlready been explained, the State of Minnesota has had a change of heart in their agreement to allow the right of way to be taken for the service road. 'j'tai6 iPfects the cost of the project tremendously, and the Council has been idvised of th3s, since the initial costs as quoted to the people did not in- Clude this acquisition cost. It is not true the City has changed anything 8nd he Would be glad to show !!r. Schmedeke any correspondence, as he did not like theimplication that someone on the Staff was holding this up. Mr. Schmedeke said in that case, someone has made a mistake. That was not just an assumption; Fridley had a promise, � guarantee, from the State of Minnesota. A resident in the area asked why a road should be built as no one wants it. There rras a good sized petition signed disapproving of this Circle Flow, so xhy build itZ He said he thought the Council was supposed to represent the majority. Mr. Schmedeka reylied that he did not know if this g=ntleman was in $yde Park when this all started, or hox many ?lanning Commissic. Meetings ar,d �.;pupc3l Meetings h� ndd attended, but Kyde Park is considerea t.e slum area in i°ridley, There are some �eF'y �h�ap h{rnes in th'ss area and ,Fra3ley has been ��r,nt3� tq plean up the drea. Th� f1r�t fhou�ht was for apartments, but the peo�lo did not want this� tqqy x�nted it rezoned �9i' Co�rcial and expressed this desire to the Counvll. Thig aa�,_�,Fcomplished #� ��( B�atly increased the 4F1 ,-� ' ,I � �iFGULAR COUNCIL PS��TI:iG QF vCTOF3ER 2, 1'-%:. PAGE 5 ' vdlue of the lots in this s�rea. ihe residen! said that he had wanted com- mernidl zoning, but he did not know it would cost hirn SS,GDO in assesstnents. H@ did not think it was necessary and could not see the advantage in putting in the Circle Flow pattern, Mr. Schmedeke answered that he should have been ' at the many Planning Commi�sion Meetings where this was considered the best p2�n. ' , , ' , ' O Mr. Schmed�ka aFpol9gized i.nr t�kzm� so much time, he nad not.intended to g�t into a lot�g c�:s =,�a=sioY� c',uring '"he VisiYOrs sectiGn. Mayor Liebl informed �him thax if ther� a,�, a public hearixag, every�ne will be notifzed. The first thing to do is to find out exactly wh,at 3:iad of an agreement Mr. Ankrum had i�ached rrith the Highway Aepartmen2. pi7BLIC tlEARING ON 1973 BUDGET: Mayor Liebl said-that he would like to state that the municipal tax levy for 1973 r+ill not go up, but will stay virtually the same as 1972. He said that the Council still has to review in detail the Parks and hacreation Budget and the Public Works Budget which they will be doing Tuesday evening, October 3rd. As.the budget xas prepared and submitted to the Council, the<-a:= is no provision for any wiAdiall due to the federal revenue sharing bill. The City Manager added that since tMe initial information given to the "Sun" on the budget, the estlmste on how much Fridley will receive from the sales tax has been revisad upward based on new infozmation received from the State. The revenue sharing bill has not as yet been signed for 1973, so it could not be consi- dered in making up the budget. ' Mdyor Llabl said that the deadline for submitting the figures to the County is OctOber 10th, so after the study session Tuesday nigh�, the figures can be insmi`ted into the Ordinance so it will be correct for passage on second ' reading. Mayor Liebl said that Fridley will be hiring additional patrolmen, a,s it is the unanimous judgment oP the Council that the Police farce must be expanded to better protect The lives and property of the citizens and to control • !be trAffic problem. As Fridley grows, the need for a larger Police force ' g�rs. He said he hop�d that Within a year the citizens will seu the effects of thit, greater emphasis. � � ' ' I�� , • Mr. Daa Fish, 7501 Lakesi.de Road, said that as he understood it., khe mill rate was not going to increase but there wou�a be a new assessed value. The City !l8na$et� said yes, the State law has been changed s� now ue must assess propez�ty at its market value. This i5 three times the amount formerly assessed property, therefore, the 1972 mill rate is divided by three for the 1973 mill rate. The 1972 mi11 rate was 39.58 and the 1973 figure is 13.175, this is mereiy a matter of multiplying on one side or dividing on another. COUncilman Bmider said that he must core�FLi.�.j�nt tha Administration �and that he r�nted to exnress his gra#itude for the job they diri, OYher munieipalitias h�pve hdd t='ouble staying s�ithin the limits 3mposed by the State. Mayor Liebl �dded #h�t it is also due to the hard wcark of the Plannin� Commission, past � p�^asent Cquncils, and the Staff in getting industry into £ridle}� for a better t�X base and to provide jobs for our citiaens. MQTZPN �y Coupci�man M1t�Rlstddt to close the pUblic heax•ing on ghe 1973 budget. S4COnde¢ by CounGilman UtCer. Upon a yoice vote� �ll ayes, "tayor Liebl daclared the haie3ng alos�d at 8.4Q PM. 4G ' ' , ' , ' ' ' ' , 1 ' � xp; Nasun M. Qureshi - City ETrgineer MEMd FROM: Darr�l Clark - Cormnunity Aevelopment Advn. MEMp pATE: October 16, 1972 RE: Enforcement of SFM 501 The State has not yet provided guidelines for this regulation which requires that accessibi.lity and usability features for t'tie physically handicapped be provided in a11 but one and two family dwellings or farm buildings (State Statutes 471.465). The literal enforcement of this regulation placas an undue hardship on the owner and builder of small (3 to 8 units) buildings ior eacample, the requirement of ground leuel entrance to a split foyer four-plex requires complete redesign to allow the possibility that a hr;:licapped individual may wanC to rent a unit in the building. !+pproximacely three percent of the population has some form of physical handicap; it seems reasonable then that three percent of the uaits in a; building should ace4modate the physically handicapped. A compror:.ise�amendment is presently before the State Building Inspector which wou:<: reyuire accessibility and usability features in buildings of 8 u.�a,t.s or more. I would recoumend that the City Council adopt such a compromise as an interim guideline to be used in our Building Inspection Department. This would prevent undue hardship from being placed on the owners and builders of small apartment buildings till the State has time to consider amendments and offer guidelines. �_� '�� ',, % j � � ,i �`'_'-s �-.a i,` DARREf, CLARK Co�nity Development Administrator DC /znh cc: City D4anager � I �� I ' i?7�,.i.'Y NUtd7CTPAl. I.�QfJ�K tlid TaL•ulatior. �� CT(�F'� � n . � c�',_.' `\ \\ �� • � �� l!%�iG'��y.1: 4y� �..i/G. � ii:.'�n A,t . -_-- -- � -=�. -- j � .' ��;it��!'L. �.-i14�Y`_�'TOR � p1j1u '3Ti1 � A�`. i' � i. � p1l' ,_° � �- _ �� j � 9i I �:1s . r' ��5'#1.----- ! �� _'�.__:_:. ` . _ > t i ' yE] 1 t� £al � r;oa Co. �� DI DfOve-7__ ' � "1_ �;• _ /11.1• oe�,rl;��'e'D ��'O /�M�� _ � -- --+- . P €,rut „ oo�s � t 7''i�'�'� OdOrray ��' Gi 2 �: t_nn. 2�60.N ; (�ese.wf Z/O -� ✓ — _� _ ___° -- .. _ _ _ __ _ _ _ � ,�a n .• r, t:ui; r D!■O�t� Oc�Drra� __ � -- -✓ - ��,` , �, f 94, p•� _ z�r'..�►--�r'°''� �d� R..�1 : r.i. St� F_hy tio. ,�._.�_�_.. oE.Ov� .__ _ _ ' t 79' e�)w� T' OFOvt7 � !f�,s , rf. n � - ! L(r}I W r' I/7.+.a /� %�nfNi � --^--r°--'---- .. ___ _,.. . Berg��n1 .T rzs�� --° - !�T r .. . - -- - , --__-�_--_—_�_ r.ey«^�1b s'd; • � ; ir�,7�3'� ~0�0� �M � ..�.�. -t--� °-_�__._--t E:� r.l y:.. � � . _ :'� 'i r ` a ? < < 3 �' . � . �} z�.�r � z��3 ��O �J� .. ._.v------�� - -....._._____ . -- . .. Y-L 2 i L �. t ..se<. . _..__. ��YC,�- _. oi-0�-t�+- -_.__. �- . x�,.:, x,� �. u, fl;:�c �% irTiT�l1•�'d' �7�Oe� 2� Q_,�.� ✓ ! ._ _ a ,�_.._.._ _._._,__ _ _ �j .+ jf e : ---- -"�"'" 7' __ --.__-� ',:. � � ,� i�;. . � 77i 9' •°' �ro.• f ra.. /!� d � .ir,l s es. a_ _ . ..._ _�� _.__ ----- • � �,..,�y , � kic�r� -,:��,n s . -,cIK7 --��PvcY �_, y '�t�.5 ��: � T�l,�'�i�.d 7r �.d.M ;. �} t.hr,r �,e�f � i ;� � _ _ __ _._____ ____..�-.------,� - --. _ __ _ _ _.-- - ---__ _�,� �.� _ _ _ .. __ ___ � '� �.,:t G ? - urit brxck fac�n�, �� ' � t' � '� ie.v ih�-eof 2�' .cn-. a.7.r r; .. ✓:t%L' bi�Li.tcp par�tit}. ' fii.1, i, ,+rJ�1�F. n� f�'"..73 ( � -.i� =. :^ ��uB�C 4.91` �j'. n le..i . . �. c � i:. �1 a'. » 1. r.. : , t. � : . °' . � � . � - C�_ .,. 9�. ., ..... 6 �� ._<:b ��T . tL'Z v CO[.�' "':UC� 1 i^.0 F. ..._^.j: a �.iL+l...i.�a..�i t1�t:£t '.�illio .. ' . _. _ _-----°j _ _ �._.. _ _ _ .. _ - _ _._._..- - _ _ ._ e. _. _ +T{ �" t�d� i�•. �-�i�'.C:��l� � .. �yr � .. � �.+ vt.._ .._ � }1 j} .. �Y , 1 . _--�.__�' _ '_..� _ .. :. .:._, . ' . n .__. .. __ _ • . Y t t i ��C..".__', . :, i . . . ..__ _ _-•._...... �. � 1 .. , r.` r � ' ' � -: � f a�c, rrry �O� � ^�► �7��(� . . Q. _,.. . _�..�__ — .; � � i ,.�- 14 _ .C�.:C151 —.__�.� _._... _..._ ._ . _ . . • ��% �,e /„-1 f �(JD (%��% . ' _�� c;'-----.� .._ - ` ____._ _ ; _ , _._. - - _. _ .. rF1 _ . � �.6 , s-9.�-�+ �a�s � � ✓. , . :. L ." —.�...� _ . .._: . * � � . . .. . _ . _ . ... .. . .. p 4 l. ( � . ... _, _ _. .r , 2� � a ., a''g � 3 S'3 "'i 7��`ft �� /is�'� '� . . -- - ---� _ . . . � _ � !J' F.. '-i.�r t ..n ' � Z��srL� o++ _._..._ ______� . _ . . ; _ �'_ _._._.___� .Z?►r�; -.• _ u ti_• �iCi 330-�-+ . „� . .. , __ x __ ._._--...___. _, �.... 1 __, . ,. ; Z,', � � �. . _ . _ _ _.__. . .. . _`_F_. . ° I ' 7`'�, : •, i L � i ��0 �� ' 7o�h►s � r"�. � a�,,�,s ��T�*- GrE�cl 7 t+�, �T c�Oi _ 6 F./ • 7 D�j �6.f�' 7 0� G� �j ✓ r3..��j ✓ _: _ ��++''� v i�.r-� 9 ✓ /��/ � .. . .. . . __ _...--�-_ . � '' r(tLL6EY h:�NiCIPAL LIt1t�ON. 5TG�E Sid Tabulation �_, �e.^.tr��t k:7ec. '; tKpis��Minn,� Gopt:u f7ec. 21'L '�--N_; nr.� ,' ,Eacon's Elcc. f ridte;/� Mi�n. Hergens Elec. , S:a, zarat Y.inn. Libby E?.ec. ": M 1? . Htnc , _� =_..z T.____._. � Le� rt�c.. { ,}ii1 u� N i r. n� G�urtLrc Ei�w i�2aa *finn�,_- :'I.etx El.ee. t�r.c+lc^, Minn. , Sallb�sd- %'ec. ,, ..Y�.�.._....,,_._ Jehn f'ss & Sou tiopki:�s, �Eann. Raliabl� F.lac. ,N�ls�_Minn. Tn*a7. L•Aec. � 1 .y �.,- r:i i lrner �S$e0� � � � � � , u I ' ' �� .. . � . �� ,�-�" . �`' � C� J� Novembex 9r ;7� ' ` 11:3� tiM �BaSE BID � • P..�YS ! SEC . f f t � 9%'� '-•--� � � o�-v` ; r�t..�'� . wl I� �'� j �lr� 4 �''� —_i--+! --��) —_�� /�, 99 ° •a+ }_7__b�_ ': �o ��%/ i!� �„ °'� 7_�c�_j � 1i..�'i —�---- _ -- • • wa , GA.�t� : �i�*___�_.�____, .�1-..+�. __ �.. ��. 4� i. N i��.►� li.a-i�, APD'A. � e ✓ � /. _ ✓ �� Y� r � ..._T.�.�„__r_•-__ ._ �--, . -- �4 ! ; # YYi %S� • °� 7 �� / �( ��._� �'+{'''� _ � _ � C�Fv i, ! . � � ! 6 i� ' �''� � � �,�5 . /�bf'�'' i 1� � ----------__. � ..__ ._ -- - __----- -j 4.. 7..�57•.s+ ; .� .�% dr4'Is. �_, �i'!'�l r�__._____.—. - -- -M - T �� , � ,/ � I � . 6�ts'• -r---e.�''rs . ;-- B�'D ;-- -i � .___. . �. _ _ ; ' i�_� �. ^_a___7._ a �� --_-B.�►p_.�_�I_��;� . Griv ` : ' l ` � 9 • t • '' ___�_� ..�rs =.. �.-r' g ;_ _.__'-� F _._ __� , l�Yi�° • � 7 !-A .___�_lir.a*�p...i_i!�° a+�_'�y : �„__ . .�_,......_._..__�..�._L...�.� . ' ._... .. � , • T0: FRpM: SUBJECT DATE: .. CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM GfRALD R. DAVIS, CITY MANA6ER,•AND CITY COUNCIL MARVIN C. BRUNSELI> FINANCE DIRECTOR FINANCING LIQUOR STORE BUILDING NOYEMBER 10, 1972 ACGached as Exhibit "A" is a"Cash Flow Projection" for the Liquor Fund. Approximately $128,000.00 will have to be secured from sources outside the LiQuor Fund to complete the building of the new store. We are currently in the proCess of finalizing the loan from the Fire Relief Association for the addition to the City Garage and the land that the garage building is sdtuated on. The fire Relief Association will also be iending money to the City for the new fire truck which will be delivered shortly after the first of the year. They have no additional funds available to lend the City. This leaves a cho9ce of three areas from which to secure financing; one choice would be to use the money in the State Aid Revolving Account. The one consider- ation that should be kept in mind in doing this, however, is that I am not sure thdt anyone knows at this time how much, if any, the City will have to contribute towaPds the underpass on Mississippi Street. This is a very costly project so that even if the City were to end up paying five or ten percent of the total co5t, it would be a significant amount of money. I do not know of any other source the City cauld get money from for this underpass project other than the Stdt� Aid funds. Mother source of financing for the liquor store building would be to sell revenue bonds. Another way of providing the money would be to use the revenue sharing money in the General Fund to replace part of the liquor transfer to the General Fund. The Liquor Fund could pay cash for all but $10,000.00 of the building. The $10,000.00 balance could be handted internally in a number of ways by a temporary transfer from State Aid or some other fund. The latest estimate of what Fridley will receive on revenue sharing is about $11_7,IIU0_M.. I recomnend the City Council go on a pay as you go basis, using revenue sharing money to reptace most of the liquor transfer to the General Fund, and use the Liquor fund money to finan¢e the tiquor store. LIQUOR FUND CASH FLOW PROJECTION CASH AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - 9/30/72 LESS: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE NET CASH lIQUOR STORE - 9/30/72 ESTIMATED PROFIT LAST 3 MONTHS OF 1972 PRINCIPLE TO BE RECEIVED ON CONTRACTS FOR DEED LAST 3 MONTHS LESS: TRANSFERS TO BE MADE TO GENERAL FUNO LAST 3 MONTHS ESTIMATED CASH BAIANCE 12/31/72 ESTIMATED PROFIT 1973 PRINCIPLE TO BE RECE�YED ON CONTRACTS FOR pEED IN 1973 TOTAL I,ESS: BUDGETEO TRANSFERS TO BE MADE TO GENERAL FUND IN 1973 BALANCE � LESS: ESTIMATED COST OF NEW BUILDING $156,750.00 LESS $3,275.00 = CASH DEFICIT EXHIBIT "A" SEPTEMBER 30, 1912 $ 86,330.64 24,436.46 61,894.18 $ 30,000.00 2,606.54 4,500.7 $ 45,500.00 49,000.72 $ 100,000.00 9,253.47 158, 4. 9 132=746.00 $ 25,508.19 153,475.00 $ (127,966.81) Er I� u � 7 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA November 10, 1972 MEMO T0: THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: JOINT I�ETYNG BE141EEN TF�.' CITY CWNCIL, FRIDLEY POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION BOARD OP DiAECTORS AND CITY STAFF ON Sl1BJECT OF FINANCING THE POLICE PENSION FUND On Thursday, November 9, 1972, the City Attorney, Finance Director and myseLf inet with the Police Penaion Board to discuss the matter of the City's contribution rate to the Police Pension Fund. This is in line with the letter which the City received dated July 11� 1972, signed by Richard D. Huss, Vice President of the Police Pension Association (copy attached). The Po11ce Pension Board requested that they have a joint meeting with the vouncil in order that the "Hewitt Plan" could be explained to the City Council. The "Hewitt Plan" which was developed by the firm of actuaries, Hewitt and Associates, is for the purpoae of reducing the financial burden imposed upon the affected municipalities by the Guidelines Act of 1969. Because this subject is very complex and quite involved, it vas suggested that the meeting be held on a night other than a regular Council t�eting night. The Pension Board would like to have representatives from Hewitt and Aeaociates preeent to explain the proposal in detail. The League of Minnesota Municipalities has done a thorough evaluation of the Hewitt propp8al� and I will be getting that out prior to the November 27 meeting, if you decide upon that date for a meeting. I would like to emphasize tha[ this problem is perhaps one of the more pressing fin�npial proble�s #acing the City. The City is not meeting the funding requirements for the Po11ce Penaion Fund as required by the Guidelines Act of 1969 as detailed for ypu in the Bttached q,emo dated September 13, 1972, prepared by the Finance Director. The reaso� this funding ia not occuring is because of the Council's policy of only conCribuking 217> of Police payroll into the pension plan. If the Council concurs in the meeting date of November 27th, I will notify the Police Pension Asaociati.on and make arrangements for the meeting. ' ' GRD/ms , Enalosures Very respectfully, ��X"o""� �� Gerald R. Davis City Manager � i� � Frtdley Folics Yer,sion Nssoclation 5431 University Ave. [i.E. � Fridley, !!innesota 5543�' � July 11. 72 'Mr 4erald Davis , City ?�lanager CiC9 of Ft+idley �6i�31 ilniverait� Ave. N.E Eridley. Minneaota 55lt32 'De�r Mr Daaia: Peraultnt to your latter of .'une 29, 1?i7 the memberahip hea authorized me to prep�tre and aubmit the following atatement to you and the city council: ; :� " The F�id7,sy Police Penaion A�aociatlon agrees that it will negotiats pension hen�fiCa tar 1973. It further agresa to aollaborat• in the developaeat aad support of lsgi�l�tion whioh xill have the ePPeot of reducing tt►e employsra ' ahal�e of the noat of tit�laacing the penaion benefiL plan to 21� of baae aalary.' Pi�ase P�el fr�e to contact Lhe aesociation or myself at any tim� regarding �thia maLt�r. ' � �C: '4ayor Lieb1 Counall�aan Sriedsr Councixman MiddlesCadt 'Counoilman IItter '. I 1 I , I� I_' Sinc�r�sly yours, �t �! i/ci�a"'f� L� �<-�, ,�- Richard D. Huss Vice Preaident . , 1 ' ' T0: FROM CtTY Of FRtDLEY MEMORANDUM GERALD R. DAVIS, CITY MANAGER MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, FINANCE DIRECTOR � �. r ; / U r_�� t_: ISUBJECT: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS fOR POLICE PENSION FUND AS REQUIRED BY GUIDELINES ACT OF 1969 , DATE: SEPTEMBER 13. 1972 ' pttached herewith you will find two charts showing the projected tax levies required for the Police Pension Fund as required by the Guidelines Act of 1969. ■J One chart shows the contribution required if the Police force remains at twenty� three sworn officers, excluding the Public Safety Director. The other projection shows the cost or contributions required for a force of twenty-seven sworn officers, plus the Pubtic Safety Director. � I would like to emphasize, that according to our calculations, a depasit of � s9z.228 would be required for the year 1973 if no changes are made in the benefit schedule of the Police Pension Fund, and if the force was brought up to the total , , strength of twenty-seven men, plus the dispatchers, Public Safety Director and other non SWorn personnel. �As you know, the budget has been prepared on the basis of contri6uting twentyrone �percent of payroll to the pension fund. This was done on the assumption that changes will be made in the benefit schedule of the Police Pension Fund. The schedule shows that 6y 1980 the yearly contributions % r a force of taenty-seven ' sxorn offieers would be $242.910 with the present benefit schedule pfi�,h the budget for the y�ar 1972 of $56.396, cc: James P. Hill. Public Sdf�ty Directar This compares �� Vi tp l0 V 4Li lD � l0 iD iti �Ll lD Nw O�� OV+c.°�n?wr. � Hi T7 � �-+ N A A W W W W W W N N N N i N� J W.�IOV JJ-�N-'l0 CJQI<T O'S C] �p �� tp. W V-+ v N lil � @�� p ��N �•,�ntn tO -+�O Jrn n (D �+OtO W V V tOtO AlD N � 0+ N 1 N V V(Ji Ul V V V G O A O `'S �� vi J J J J W W W N N N N N O O O�D C O� W O OOOOtO V CJ? OO W V V 1 V� V l N W W t 0 t D N N O l tT[Il()l--�W VI��ANV -J bv N NN-+��--i�_' ��"'' N-� O�D QJ V Ot 01 Vt A W W 01 V1 V1 Ul 61 V t0 O W 01 l0 N [T V A01 W.AO�DG700A W A VpJOIiD?IDNNQ�A O V.1 O 1 J' 1 V N O O A W� D V �n N N N�JNN�� --'�--'-' Ol V1 W N�--� O t0 O7 V O� Ol f.Tl W OCCV O1Q�01 V NIO�--�A �p�iJA--��OOI O CO�D�O L� N N JN �-�-� �--' ��-' W� O�.00D V JO�(n�A W --+ - N W tf1 V�D W CT O� V N V 01lOO�Ul01 V(Il ON� A � WUl N'07l'J01lOOlNO A N W N�O N�-� O 01 V1 V V' N....� .� � � .� O lD W O� A� O� cn cn NN O(.'�A V lJl OtN Z Z . .. ,. ,. ,. ,. . Z ('pV ION�+10 �O W�D• an�oarnvp�rn°on v+ J J N W(}� V �O l0 \ O� A N U l A V C O W ZZr Z �DOCnA��oN �o VND •• 01NC7iN W V W O(J�• Ob07V01V1 AWN-' C O O O O O O O O O 28 2E 88 33 :3 82 o Q 3� o"� d$ 64 ��--�NN W N �O O •-� cn --+ V -� �O 1 I dp� V.p--� W O cTZZ 1 ON-'O V 01 (NO• • p1V OlOJlO W V �--�D.� � N N NN--�--�-�� (A (T [n JN-� O�O � rn.n cn O� N �--�NN NU tn A V+ . .D W l0 ivvrn0oviocriwo�c�o A--� WNOQ] V �D W V:TO AN W VOAO�V A' � �--� N .A Ol CO N -rN01A V O��O�D V� 1 1 t + . � - 1 1 1-+ t0 Ot -' W V1 O W Vl I 1 1 N N O-' � V1 Ol N W f.n lD 1� �D A O� �O lD 01 ..r � .� � y�.a � OOOOOO��DOO� - -wwwwn�..�wwrnv cncnA-�AOwrn�+v -� -r O-� (J� W U A W cT rnrnw0000-�rn�rn Q O(h O� N W tQ W cT o � N J _.�i h J � Z � (D �T N rt f'1 Z V1 (T O O Q+ �--' N i �• `t � N Oi a � ae J O M c�3r 3��° 7 � N �+Q N � � .� Q nC�--1 O �• O N e-' rF �+�c a C-1 <'O oro-s �wro `+ 'T < � � 0 � c N �NC V � O � "O fD � < 3 e+ W �. fD G O 'f J c+ w o -5 Z C rT N G (� S �f �. K O 7 Lj'�' � a2 1' � A .-+ 3 O 7 d2 � 3 n 7 Z � M � �.Oi C O' � � • (p J� � <Ar-i fD fD /D O G� .O < K Z � J-+� 0 l I O O � � � � J�.qon • � Z Z � J (D (D w a cY N {/� fD fD < O w -�i� Z � n m r• � rr a _. � O V m n � rw O � _a D x r m � � H A i�'1 O W c� L= O m 7C � O r r.� n m T O .TJ n m n -i N W � m Z � � v � > a � T N � N a ' � ' ' ' � ' M �I J J �d J J�I J�1 wn� »I �O N tEP �8 lO :D l0 l0 i0 �.D V i0 (p �� V V�J V V V V V V N� O l0 W V 01 (T A W N� W �'V r-+N lT A A? A W W W W W N N i(D 3 W O OD O� .P -� �O OJ O� A N Ol cn . O'f h_-+ IONNO��ON A W lOO1 -.� p� V A W W W W W N�O cn cn O� fD < fD 'S W[7� �P N tli W N--i O� W-+ CJ l'1 fD Ci �C �Qp�--� Vl V OON-� WO�AO �' Q' N 1 L� � � � W W W W W W W W N N N N NNN N—�—J—�O(:001 (.1 O 0000�0 V NNU'i O W V OOOD W AAO O�wN N O� NNN W 0�--'�ON V -r V� � NNNNNN-�� T(T1WN�OlOW V01 W W 47 O 0� V Ol 01 01 01 W�O �O N OA(J�N W ONt00(1� OJ� N�00�0 W (T1�OON O�A �rn0o WN W rn--��cn �Ov v+ W N N N N N N N N-� O�U V O 1 t J 1 W N� O� D T t n (71� V A-'�O Cb V 01 v�--�.A OONAN0101--i W tD� V O AVOO-'p �Ow W N �.� v+ NNN N N J N-•-�-' -' G1 (71 A W N O�O OD v A c.J A W N N W W:a V1 Ul (Jl 01 V c7�A�000-�LOO� W W W N N -�tJI-+W Ol0 Np W W NO �O � O+-� V.F.. p0 W W� N(T V _ � NNN-��-� W -+00� 61N �O(n tJi Z Z 1-+ l O V 1 V N l G N O� N Z Dain�iovina+ivwio• N W� O 0 0 N v N� O O A ..-i W�ppp V ONO� O• � � J -�-��N A011O-J �O ZZ�--�W V01N(JiW l0 W • Z • 2�W 0�--�0-� V 01A W• D• 00 �061--�O�Ow rJ A • �O W N Ol --� W CTl i0 Vl • .• . � � � O�ON V Olcnawrv-J 1 1 O O O O O O O O O O . i3 SE E2 SE 3�'' d� o� '.a�' e c e � • � � � � N W W W 1 1�--� �+ W O� (l� N V Ul 1 I - 1 1 W V V N N O � A� Z Z IOO�A� � V NN �� M • NN N N N N-�-' �--i �O V1 U'i O l V 1 A W-+ O CO O� N� V O� N AwN�--�� cn v ro �o. -• N W 'V VIA�O(nVtp V.n^sr�;lp0 �(71�--iNW�O^^N V J'JOiG lO-�O-�WtO W VO � � c.� cn �.cn G: -+W V OlNO� W �O(n 1 1 1 w �.+++ � 1 1 1 J1� W OJ p-�6� �:T � � � W O A lTt G� O N w - O A Ut O C� W V �O C1 y� ��,{ �� 0000b"�'c��pco�i O� Ol Ol O� cn O cT O� �J �_ �O �O N 1� O� O�+ --� V�� Pla0O1 N 0�--�O w c,� OO�L1T O�NCI O �O C'�, l0 tUUI O O? � J+(:� O �-+ fD 3 fl 7 T AL J� (p (� V1 1'f C7 Z N tn O O o+ --� N "f J � � 9+ 'S 3E �� O 'fi c� 3 r ��3v�+ 1'F Q' IA T fD �. Z Q O �O I�� J c� { v O (G 'S. �n�m �+ -s < Z w -�• O � C N -�NC QO O e+ V fD fD N "h < � cr P -�. rono-s n w w o � �4 Z C rr v+ n � s� -�• ,� o � � � � Y C'� �-+ 3 p 7 S4 �• �r 'S O = 'S N -f� _ J� {U C Q N � . � .+. 7 1<Ar--a �D fD fD O G � < Cr I� � � '* O i � � �ti N (0 � -h -�. f: O Cl �• 7 � 'T 'S j N fD w w f4 V1 N YD fD <o N j 7 n m �. m c� ---I O Z � T --1 � N �ia m O � �� 1� � CJ < �� :� im v ni i� �j �1 � Cl t0 7D v O �- C7 m 1 O A n m m x n U m 0 _y O N v rn r; C = �t f. 1 ' FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR OCTOBER 1972 , Fire alarms January through October 31, 1971 .::: 295 Fire alarms January through October 31, 1972 . . 285 Decrease in alarms this year through Oct. 10 Fire Alarms for October 1971 Fire Alarms for October 1972 Decrease in alarms for Oct. 1972 ALARMS Autos $ Trucks 5 Gas Spills 1 Houses 3 Commercial 2 Industrial 3 Hospital 1 Rescue $ lst Aid 3 Multiple Dwelling 1 $on Fire .. 1 Trash 3 Grass $ Brush 0 Miscellaneous 1 Home Appliances 2 Total . . . . . 26 General Alarms Company Alarms Still Alarms . . . . 27 . . . . 26 . . . . 1 TYPES OF ALARMS 18 Average response 18.5 6 Average response 10.0 Z Average response S.0 General Alarms Jan. through Oct. 1972...206 Av. Response 18.50 General Alarms Jan, through Oct. 1971...200 Av. Response 17.18 Three training sessions were held for the department with an average attendance of 23.33 men. The regular monthly business meeting of the department was held Thursday October Sth with 27 members attending. There was one fire call to Hilltop this month. A trash container behind Applebaums Supermarket. The commercial and apartment buildings in the Village of Hilltop were inspected this month. A copy of the corrections to be made will be delivered to the Mayor of Hilltop. Two hundred children and twenty adults toured the station during Fire Prevention Week. The Village of.Hilltop signed the new Fire Protection Contract. I' Central Air Conditioning was installed in the Fire Dept. meeting room and Dormitory. - I ' I 1 Firefighter Gary Thompson submitted a letter of resignation. He stated he is unable to devote enough time to the fire department, due to outside activity. The members voted to accept his resignation. He served 21 months on the department. The Fire Department Women's Auxiliary presented the department with bed lamps £or the dormitory. I' : Members of the department discussed County Police Dispatching, and want�d to know how it would effect the fire department. Requested more information from the City hfanager. Mr. Hi11 to report to the department at the December meeting. I ' I ' MEETINGS ATTENDED� Mituiesota State Fire Chief's Meeting--Duluth Council Meeting--Budget Chamber of Commerce Metro Paid Fire Chiefs , Respectfully submitted, �� , �`�\ J A � � �?/ R bert S. Hugh , Chief � � .. �.. � � �� .; p a o 0 0 0 0 � � � � � � N' N N N N N N N N V1 V1 V1 A A p � � � � � � v ' �i J �1 �I �1 �� 7 '�. �-' O O O n+ i-+ .� � � tA A N W O �,,, N N� W A Vt �+ W' ��. '00� � N W A p0 N N m w w w b w " � � � .. 8� �B @ B� 9 'w c" 7° � rn � o i X' . K �. A N M ~ FJ �'U � � M �' O N � ' � • `� K � O V1 'C C] ¢� w m o � `� rt rn � � �' � a Z r X z rr �, � � � p m -3 � .i-A . O M . t'1 . ' • E � � x � � � A � V ., � `3� M G G O p O fi ' o N � o o m m v�i a" N �'i N ti g 3 ,� N. W � , K N � . � O � K � o� � rn rn rn rn rn � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V. �1 �7 V �1 . V V ' � i � � m �°o i r, .-. .-• a, n n n o � �cs b ro N � � � `G K `G v v �-' � t�ft A . �N W O � � rn O N W A tn �--� W N O. �p W A A lp W pp w ny w w w b m b � � s � � a � '� �""1 � �-' N � N � t0 t'J CD N OG F. N N N N N N N N �O, � V O� Vt A W- N i ` � i x E r 0 � r I� � V N N � F• w �i r r I-' O rt G M O rn 0 V r � 1--' F d 9 r O+ N O� r i O N O 0 ro � [•1 W Ol f1 '�U C N �S �.° M � b 1 m "� 3 m O n -D-1 0 2 N N W � m m M N N T rD C y O A 3 a rn e, o, c 0 0 0 ? � � � � I 1 rn a� 0 0 � � v m .. N n � °g o z �, o p Z v t7 W N � Z F O ln V� w r o m w v < � � ' � e� m N � �--� 7_ O 7 �! O p � b T 3 m z N I�i O� O� Z t� r o a O n � 0 � m n r � V ro 0 I ' � i■ �� -' '� ! � a � � � � � � a o 0 0 0 o b. � � � � � � .D W W W N N N i 0 0 0 � � '� m � � � � � � J V �7 �1 J V N N N N N N b-' h' p N N� ti+ �O� A t0 W t+ t0 ,,,� A W fn A O A � A N pp � O �D W m�. �o ro w ro b ro s a � s � � a � � o � E � $ ° �. K �` O. O y N ��.y � v�i y P� ��c' 3 �. � . 'V N O � O W � � A D . �N . � '�O � -� � o w o o y N 9 Z �� m w � n n co � ❑ z m cr w �u cn d .s � H m m w w m m w � N� F� F+ fl n V� y N twi� y �i N i m N f/ T1 [�i N � (JI 1 1 1-` H• �' T � � H � � D F+ � � n � � M � � A y y •n 3 w r. N. �+ ff H w w m � � rn rn rn rn rn rn � 0 0 0 0 0 o z N � V V J V � 1 I � � � � � � � � r� A O� O� C] y Q� p� � � O rn rn r• W Z O O � - � O N N N � � v v Z 6f 1-' 1r p N N 1-+ � O� A c0 W 1-� t0 Z A W � A i--� A- N A W c0 I--� O N m ro b w ^cs b ro � � � � � i �' � � ' 1 • m , � N � r N FJ O A. �•W O� �� i fn b � 3 m z N N N N N N � N A Oo OJ Oo O� Z_ W N I--� O OA 0 n 0 W m � �; N ' , Summary of Fire Alarms , � ' Residential .' �. � ISOA-REB�EIItj.81 Commercial � ' Industrial ' i � Grass 3 Brush � ' Auto 6 Truck � ! , 1st Aid 6 Rescue Falae ' , HonesE Mistake Miecellaneoua ' Storage � Mutual Aid Hilltop ' Total FIRE PREPENTION BUREAU This Month 4 Q 0 2 2 5 3 0 2 7 0 0 1 26 October 2972 This Month Last Year Total 2 35 0 9 0 14 0 13 0 37 5 43 2 15 0 9 2 - 24 15 63 0 8 0 0 1 7 27 276 &esponse: 26 alarms 403 men ' 18 general alarms 333 men 18.5 men/call ' 6 company alarms 60 men 10.0 men/call 2 etill alarms 10 mea 5.0 men/call , Death 6 Injuries for month of Octo�er Injuries Deaths Firemen -0- -0- Civilians -0- -0- , Total Losaes for month of October Suildings Contents $700.00 $7,0000.00 ' , Total Losses for Year Buildings Contents $158,002.50 $130,845.00 Railroad Cars 8,000.00 1 , , Total for Year 9 1 Aflto S Truck $1,970.00 Auto 5 Truck Q4,783.00 Summary of Activities Huildings Inapected Aeinspections Inspections other than buildinge Buming Permits Inspector Othere Special Permits Occupancy Permits Total Orders Issued Orders Completed Illegal Equipment Written Wamings Verbal Warnings Complaints Fire Investigations l�ii7of i:iul{1�1�Y�i{�7�f:1il:�d:Ui This Month 66 21 6 0 0 0 0 1 134 6 11 0 16 14 0 1 Octaber 1972 This Month Last Year Total ZZ 336 0 99 6 67 4 2 0 1 0 29 0 2 0 16 14 7 2 23 10 0 13 2 487 53 70 0 72 152 12 30 Extra Activities Pire Prevention Mailing Multiple Dwelling Licenses processed 6 Special visits to lst and 2nd grades in schools with Fire Truck for Fire Prevention lectures , Plans & Checks on new construction Station tours for students during Fire Prevention Week , 0 � r 1 FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 1972 Fire Alarms January through September 3o, 1971 ..... 268 Fire Alarms 3anuary through September 30, 1972 ..... 259 _ Decrease in alarms through Sept. this year. ..... 9 Fire Alarms for September 1972 •_•• 26 Fire Alarms for September 1971 ..... 16 Increase in Alarms for September 1972 ..... T6 ALARMS TYPES OF ALARMS Autos fr Trucks Gas Spills Houses Commercial Industrial Rescue & lst Aid Grass $ �'rash Home Appliances Gas Odor Faulty Alarms Bomb Scare Hospital Apartment House Tree House Total Alarms 4 2 1 1 0 3 4 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 26 General Alarms ... 20 Average Response ...20.0 Company Alarms ... 1 Average Response ...10:0 Still Alarms .:: 5 Average Response ... 4.8 Losses for the month of September amounted to less than $1,000.00. Most of the loss was caused by the auto and truck fires. _ There were three drill this month with an average attendance of 23.33 men.. The regular monthly business meeting of the Department was held Thursday September 7th with 27 members present. Wm. Sandin requested a months leave of absence due to ill health. The request was granted. , Richard Schmidt asked to attend the Annual,Professional Emergency Care Course, to be held Sept. 27th, 28th, 30th and 31st. He was suthorized to attend. An Application for membership was received from Ronald Romanchuk. His application was received and placed on file. Word was received from the Thibault Company�that the Aerial Ladder will not be delivered until February. Larry Peka stated that he planned to attend the Minnesota Rescue and First Aid Association Conference Lo be held September 16th and 17th. . Gene Webber, head of the Minnesota State Fire Marshals Office, died of a heart attack. Chief`s Hughes and Aldrich plan to attend the funeral. MEETINGS ATTENDED: Staff Meetings Chamber of Commerce Hilltop Council Meeting United Fund Breakfast 18 Cub Scouts and 5 Adults toured the Fire Station. Respectfully Submitted, ��! . t ert S. Hughes, C e � ' tp : lD .t0 �O �O t0.. �t0 �D t0 � � �O . t0 l0 ��D . �O� � t0 �O �O '� . �� \ \ \ \ \ \� � \ \ \ \ '\ \ \ F:�.. �"' F+ F+ 1� � I-+ I-+ F-+ f+ �"' �"' F+ F+ 00 V Q� ' Vl N N b. O� �� A A W W N N F-+ �" �"" O O \ \ \ \ \ D :` ` ` \ \ \ � \ \ \ � \ \ V V V J �I V i V V V V J V .�l J �l v V �l N� N N. N N� N m -N N� N N N N N N N N N N N ' '�"' N F+ N Y F+ 1�+ 1-+ O N F' � h' �"" N I-+ I-+ F+ 1-+ 1-+ O O� �"' A O OD Q� N O� O� O N A W W Oo O� �.P O� N W � ��, N� �p"�� N W W N N A V1 A �" � O O W !-+ I-+ O N F+ W� "� fn � N T N �O l0 A N �`'� v V N N N W l0 OD W m , �o '� b ro b b w '° 'b 'ti ro �v �o b �o w . � � � B 3 � � � � � . 3 7 � 9 3 � 9 � 3 8 � '�' ao ['� rn .-� M � rn 3 c"� n� �sf y � � a � � � - . . . m w �o n� w v� co r. c o y E w a+ m oo m w w . '7' � l+ p o N N rt p��- w w `t . cn i � 7 O `G Ln O � ~' �' O � 3 F' O` W c�D 'n H y N N• �-.'P. W x �I � f'1 LY+ v' F" � �O f� �-1 H A� O � M tn G Q' N C7 � C g tn ,� � �' `G A N fA '.� 8 � fn N• ce � w a m e w w �• � o� �+ �r x w v, �* �a r• �* m D � K N � K � � ,�.r ' o � . a a o b r �� `' .� � m c�o o m � m � ^u w m � � � o m v� D � z �• m� � w M m ''� '-' m x r cn t7 2 �+ --1 m r+ a r < w �• � � w o n .s . o — y m �e z w m ❑ N �- fr o r• y � o � a m cn � y oo � � „ � K < r• c+� z °, � o o � ]. �o m m o x c w � � � � � , a � o y V tt] (p � K � 3' H � F+ � [rl � `+9 C1 'xf G1 > w 3 �G� G N O G O W � � N w p �N (D N G V�i C N e�f I-�+ N (D rf F+ C tY B V+ �' . N O rf '3 O r N O � y � �.O y FD+� fD F! O K y'� O D � y � y w m M. O N p y a y .p � � r � - W N � � T i ~ � � � � � . . � � �' _ � w i' ' � ` . � � �, � o� �. � � � � � � � � � �. � � � �. _ o � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Z i' �1 � p N �1 tn V V V �1 2 V �1 V O �7 V V p� ��'j � O� T O� � O� '�` O�. U "' O O W � p�p � p�p p�p dp � � � i i � i i m � � T T O+ H '', ° o 0 0 o v N� N O� r--. N � In r-� � K o w � � v , . . �. � v, � � � z , . . .. . � , � � .�. � f" fJ I--� N 1--� !-+. F� F+ O N F+ F-� �+ N I-+ 1--� h+ 1--� F-� O � � A O• 00 O� N � lT O O N A W W Co �'vT A .. .. O� N W 2 (l� b• N W W fn W N tn A �" � O O W r+ ✓ �--� N t+ t/� W � N N V p� O O� Vl N N � b N N N A p tp V m 'ty 'tf 'O 'b 'd 'ti7 'b 'ti � W 'O 'C 'C 'b 'b 'C 'c7 'd 'C RY � W C � ? B � � B � � �3 B 9 ? � 8 � � � 9 � 3 ,� m , ' ' . 1 N F" N N N �--' �--' M-� �" W 1-+ F-+ N��..� � �, N A F-' A N. A �1. �I O� Gc A � v A O Oo r. 'O� W i 0o A � , b � � 1, m Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A A A A A A A A 4� W W W W N 'T � W N �-+ O l0 Oo V O� tn A W N �' O �D Go V O� V� A .OT � v �"� � m v �-i � w m z � V N i ' I 1 i , � i i ' . i � E ' t ' ' , , ' — , ' � ' , , �� I �� b \ \ N N N ~ D � V \ � � � \ V v m v v N N N N �"' f+ F+ O O p W 1r Q� V 1 W � N �+ N 3 W W N � b m �, w w 9 � � e � � H � H v F' � y A �' O Qy p'' � O U A O` �+ [7 � � � � O � �, 7 0 � r n K � t°i 70 � � � fD � � z W r r1Di � z m Z . � � � M � d �+ H N � N n y () N C � �' y y M x w m . j" 7 w n m .°,� n o r' y o w � n � o � x' i K m H rn W � o 0 0 o z � V V V V � � � U O P v � W A O� � � N O � � � p O r-. r-� 'O � N � � O 2 O p � '�U' � o v, � w z � ,� c� ;J � � W �-. � o o - �. �. rn v z � W W N A �-+ N N . Q` �O A G V O m _ v 'ti w w. w � J � q� 8 � � 3 � � m � � � � _ � � r N �"' /' � WICIW •-r G � - � � � Z N � �O i N N V Z ..o Wa b � 3 m z N N T � � Z� fn A pA r m m C m H �.. ' ' � V N ; � . ' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ' $ummary of Fire Alarms � September 1972 This Month Thie Month Laat Year Total ' Reaidential 4 3 ' 31 '� Non Re8ldential 2 -0 9 ; Commercial 2 1 14 t' i Industrial 0 0 11 f � Grass & Brush 2 2 35 ��' Auto 6 Truck 4 2 38 lat Aid 6 Reacue 3 1 12 p ' False 0 0 9 ' Honest Mistake 3 2 22 Miecellaneous , 5 5. 56 ' Storage ' 0 � 0 8 ' Mutual Aid 0 0 0 Hillt:;op 1 0 6 , ' Total 26 16 . 250 Reaponee: 26 alarms 424 men ' 20 General 400 men 20 mea/call � 5 Stills 14 men 2.8 men/call 1 Company 10 10 men/call ' Death & Injuries for month of September Injuries Deaths Total for Year Firemen -0- -0- 9 , Civilians -0- -0- 1 Total Loases for month of September Buildinge Contents Auto 6 Truck 27.50 0 ' 753.00 ' Total Loasea for Yesr Buildings Contents Auto 6 Truck , $157,902.50 $123,845.00 $2,813.00 Railroad Cars 8,000.00 ' • , .. I ;. .. ' .. , FIRB PRSVENTION BUREAU ' Su�arp of Actinities . September 1972 i ' Thie Moath This Month Last Year Total ' Buildings Inspected 64 22 230 Reinspectiona 6 0 78 ', Inapections other than 5 6 61 � Buildings ' Burn3ng Permita Requested 3 k 23 By Inapector 0 2 10 � ' Bq Others 0 p p ' Special Permits 3 1 13 Occupaacy Permite 0 0 1 ' Total 78 29 393 ' Orders Isaued � 28 3 �7 Ordera Complete 3 0 59 ' Illegal Bquipment 0 0 0 Wiitten Warnings 28 14 56 , nerbal Warnings 16 16 138 , ' Complainte 0 3 12 Fire Innestigations 0 4 29 , Eatra Activities 'Fridley Cpnvalescent Home - Training Staff S Personnel in Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation Multiple Dwelling Licenses processed - 57 Plans & Checka on new construction Specisl Inspections . 'Civil Defense Operational Plan Meetings with State Civil Defense and archictecte on EOC State Capltal Hearings 1 ' , ,