RES 1972-66 - 00008396120
RESOLUTION NO. 66 -1872 ,
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ST. 1971 -4
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota as follows;
1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected
by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be
specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1971 -4 in said
City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance
with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City
Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description
of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed
and the amount calculated against the same.
2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would
meet in special session at this time and place to pass on the proposed
assessment.
3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since Its filing been open
to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity
has been given to all interested persons to present then objections, if
any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections
have been filed;. except:
The following persons were then heard and presented their objections to
said assessment:
NAME OF OBJECTOR
Mrs. Ben Mathisen
Mr. W. S. Wilmo
Mr. Gene Beijer
Mr. Mike Greaser
Mr. Ralph White
Mr. Richard Simmons
Mr. Clarence H. Larson, Jr.
Mrs. Dale Bakke
Mr. Lawrence M6ggli
Mrs. Max Barker
Mr. Richard Torgenson
348 - 57th Place N.E
6164 Star Lane N.E.
6150 Star Lane N.E.
2057 Quartz Lane, St. Paul
(Owner of outlet A)
5644 - 4th St. N.E.
360 - 57th Ave. N.E.
5519 - 4th St. N.E
5805 - 3rd St. N.E
5973 - 3rd St. N.E.
5800 - 3rd St. N.E
278 - 58th Ave. N.E
OBJECTION
To asessment
Feels whole area should
share in cost.
Should not have to pay as
residential street was made
into service road.
Questioned width of street
and felt layout of street
was still not good.
Asked why roadway was
changed, and felt change
benefited only Holiday.
Felt change benefited only
Holiday.
Felt improvement was not
needed.
How long they may re- ,
tain their property.
When, if ever, is the
project to be completed?
Difficult to pay for assess-
ment, and asked much more
she will be assessed in
future.
Objected to paying about
$1,600.00.
1ESOLOTION #66 -1972
PAGE 2
4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered
as follows:
Modified roll used for the loopback portions of the project at Star Lane
and 57th Avenue at two - thirds cost for residential property and actual
cost for commercial property. (Council also specified that State Aid
Assessment Policy be changed to reflect this type of situation.)
5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land
.enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is
specially benefited by the
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1971 -4
in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the
corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such
lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby
levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land
therein described.
6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed,
adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed
assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and altera-
tions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper
special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of Rand res-
pectively.
of
7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to
by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and icon -
stitute the special assessment for
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1971 -4
8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear
interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid.at the rate of
seven and one -half (pg) per cent per annum.
9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments payable
on the 1st day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1973, and
continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each
installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by
the County Auditor,
10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the
County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all
such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the
1st day of January in each year.
7:21:
122
RESOLUTION
#66 -1972
PAGE 3
,
The iroticn
for the adoption of
the foregoing resolution was du17 seconded by
Councilman
Utter
, and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following
voted in favor thereof:
All*
and the following
voted against
the same.
None.
PASSED AND
ADOPTED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 5th
DAY OF
June
, 1972.
MAYOR Frani: G. Liebl
ATTEST:
c
CITY CLEn
- Marvin C.
Brunsell