Loading...
04/01/1974 - 5481PATRICIA ELLIS COUNCIL SECRETARY REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 1, 1974 0 FRI�LEY CITY COU�dCIL — REGULAR MEETIidG -- APRIL 1, 1974 — 7:30 P,M, 7:44 p.m. _ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Given I iVVOCAT I Oi� : by Mayor Liebl � ROLL CALL: All present Pr��Sti�TATIOiV OF Ad{�ARD: CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION: i�R GARY ST I f�ft�1LER PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION t�tr. Stimmler not present. APPROV�iL OF M I �JUTES : PUBLI C�iEAR I NG I`�EET I fvG, MARCH 11, 1974 Adopted as presented. , A1lOPT I0�1 OF AG Ei�DA : ��o additions, adopted as presented. VISITORS: 0 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA i15 MINUTES) i�one. REGULAR MEET I i�G, APR I L 1, 1974 OL� BUS I i�ESS : PAGE 2 I,ONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF DIRECTIONAL SIGN FOR UNI TY HOSP I TAL . � . . � � � . . , � . � � � , , , 1 — 1 � Variances for both the directional sign and the emergency sign approved. �VEW BUS I iVESS : RECEIVING THE MINllTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF I'1ARCH 2�, 1974 , , , , , . � � , � , , � � 2 — 2 X 1. Special Use Permit Request, S, P. #74-02, David Coppernoll: � Approved as recommended by Planning Commission with their 3 stipulations. �. Tree Ordinance: no action needed, Minutes Received. . RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS -- �ESIGN �ONTRQL MEETING OF MARCH 21, 1974� ��,,,,� 3 1. Request to construct a new br�ck and concrete block building, 7891 Elm Street, by Paco Masonry, Inc.: Approved with four recommended stipulations of Bui3ding Standards Design Control Subcommittee. (Request for variances also approved) Minutes Received. ,� REGULAR i�EETING, APRIL 1, 1974 iVEW BUSII�IESS �CONTINUED) PAGE 3 RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING oF MaRCH 26, 1974 , , , , , , �, , , , , , , , 4 - 4 P 1. Variance Request to reduce the garage stall requirements to l stall and � also request for installation of crushed rock drive instead of required hard surface. Variances approved_with deletion of any reference to the surface of the driveway. (Present surface can be used.) . 2. Variance request to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 �eet to 20 feet, 1412 North Innsbruck Drive N. E., by Curtis Johnson: Variance Approved. 3. Variances requested for addition to existing building and also for construction of detached garage, 168 Talmadge Way N, E., by Kenneth Lehr: Variances granted as recommended by Board of Appeals. 4. �Zequest for varance to allow for the construction of a roof sign, 5320 �iain S�reet Northeast, by Midland Cooperatives: Variance approved. � 5. Various Variance requests for 7891 Elm Street, by Paco Incorporated: Variances approved. 6. Variance request side yard setback for addition of 9 foot addition to present structure, E520 East River Road, by Riverside Car Wash: No action necessary. 7. Request for sign variances, Unity Hospital: Taken care of. $ . MINU1'ES RECEIVED. 0 REGULAR MEETING, APRIL 1, 1974 PAGE 3-A RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PARK AND RECREATION �OMMISSION l'�EETING�OF MARCH 4, 1974� ������,, 5- 5 D Minutes received and concurred with. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY FIUMAN RELATIONS �OMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1974, �,���.� 6- 6 A Minutes received and Council approved Mayor Liebl's appearance before the committee. �ECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI TY �OMMI SS ION ���EETI NG OF r'�ARCH 12, 1974 ����� �—% � Minutes received. , � . � � � �GULAR f`�EET I(VG, APRI L 1, 1974 PAGE 4 RECEIVING REPORT OUTLINING THE CONCERNS AND POSITIVE ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY REGARDING THE PRESERVATION OF RICE CREEK AND LOCKE LAKE FROM 1955 TO PRESENT �IVOTE: ATTACHMENTS ARE IN AGENDA FOLDER) AND ' RECEIVING STATUS REPORT REGARDING THE CITY OF FRIDLEY REQUEST TO THE RICE CREEK WATERSHED ' �ISTRICT REGARDING STUDIES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF RICE CREEK AND LOCKE LAKE � � � � � � � � � � � � � S — S G Council expressed support for Phase I of Hickok & Associates including discussions with lc�cal citizens and staff. RECEIVING REPOR7 REGARDING IMPROVING RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE OPERAT I ONS � , � � � � � , � � � � � � � � . � � � � . 9 Council approved report as guidelines for operation with review when quarterly reports are received. �. CONSIDERATION OF FUNDING OF NUCLEUS CLINIC� .�..� IO Council approved contriubtion of $1,000. � ��GULAR ��EETING, APRIL 1, 1974 I�EW t�USIi��ES"S CCONTINUED) PAG E 5 RECEIVING �EPORT REGARDING LETTER FROM ANOKA COUNTY REGARDING ALARM SYSTEM � � � � � . � � � � � , 11 - 11 D Received. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING ' IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING aDVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJ ECT ST , 1974-4 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Resolution �39-]974 adopted. , 12-12A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CHANGING �^IATER AND SEWER �ATES � � � `�, � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � , 13 - 13 C Resolution #40-1974 adopted. . � i�EGU LAR ��1EET I idG, APR I L 1, 1974 I�EW B�S 1 ��IESS ��ONT I N UED ) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO CONVEY TO THE $TATE OF �'�1NNESOTA �ERTAIN �ANDS �ONVEYED IN 1971 TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR PONDING PURPOSES, THEN TO REPURCHASE FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AT APPRAISED VALUE FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRADING SAID LOT.S FOR LAND TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF A CITY PARK �UST ACRESS THE STREET TO THE SOUTH� ,����� Kesolution #41-1974 adopted. PAGE 6 14 CONSIDERATION Of A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND �IRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPcCIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCELS 4O, SO, I�O, AND Z�O, LOTS 1-3, AUDITOR�S SUBDIVISION iJo, 152 , , , , , , , , , , , , 15 - 15 A Resolution #42-1974 adopted. � •� 0 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND ' �IRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL�ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL %ZOO, SECTION 3 � � � � � � � � . � � . . � 16 Resolution #43-7974 adopted. REGU LAR . MEET I'iVG, APR I L 1, 1974 IVEW B�S 1 iVESS ��ONT I NUED) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO CATV COMMISSION� �� PAGE 7 17 Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street N. E., reappointed with term to expire 4/1/77. �LAIMS� � � � � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � . � � Ig Approved. �I CENSES � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . , , 19 Approved. � CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE TRAILER APPLICATION — S& S TRA I LER REPA I R � � � � � � � � . � . � . � � � � ZO � � • Approved. �STIMATES � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � � � � 21 — ZI B • ' Approved. REGULAR MEETING, APRIL l, 1974 I�EW BUSII�ES� . �CONTINUED) �� i CONSIDERATION OF FORWARDING COMMUNICATION TO FCC h�EQUESTING ACTION ON THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR CATV FIRM� � � � � � � � � � � � � � ZZ Authorization given for sending ]etter. Readdress to new Chief of F. C, i;. COI�(t9Uid I CAT I OtdS : � MINNESOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: SIGNALS ON T�H� �#65 AT WEST MOORE LAKE DRIVE� � � � � � � � � . Z3 Received and.City Manager authorized to send 7etter of concurrance. I.ITY ASSESSOR: P�OTICE OF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION I�EETI NG ON MAY ZI,, I�%4 � � � � � � , � � � � � � � � Z4 Received and meeting set for May 2l, 1974 at 8:0o P. M. � OTH�R ITEf�S : RECEIVING A REPORT REGARDING THE SUBMISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL REGARDING ��IORTN PARK PROJECT BY THE CITY� .� ZS Staff report received. �:�� il � ' z�� THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF APRIL 1, 1974 ' � The negular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of April 1, 1974 was called to order � at i:44 P. f•1, by i�tayor Liebl. i PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: . . , I �� f�layor Liebl led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the � Flag. . i INVOCATION: ' The Invocation was offered by Mayor Liebl. ' , ' � ' ' ' ' ' ' ROLL CALL: (4EMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Mayor Liebl, Councilman Utter, Councilman Nee, Councilman Breider, and Councilman Starwalt. None. PRESEPdTNTIOid OF AWARD: CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION: I�1R. GARY STIMMLER, PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Mayor Liebl said Mr. Stimmler had called and said he would not be able to attend the present meeting. ilayor Liebl read the inscription on the Certificate of Appreciation aloud to the Council and audience. Mayor Liebl directed the Administration to forward the Certificate to Mr. Sti�nler. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: PUBLIC NEARING MEETING OF THE FRIQLEY CITY COUNCIL �F MARCH 11, 1974: t�lOTION by Councilman Utter to adopt the minutes of ihe Pub1ic Hearing Meeting of the ' Fridley City Council of March 11, 1974 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, i�layor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: fA0TI0N by Councilman Breider to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Councilman Utter asked Councilman Starwalt if he had asked some of the residents in the area of the proposed plat by Goodco Builders to be present at the meeting. He said he thought beca.use the matter of the settlement of the Thielmann property had not been � settled, the maiter would not be discussed at the present meeting. Mr. Larry Lembke, 1505 Ferndale Avenue N. E. questioned the Council on the status of the plat. The City Manager said he had met with the representatives of Goodco Builders, ��1r. Dropps and Mr. Goodroad, last week, and again that afternoon. He explained there had been some kind of agreement with Mr. Theilmann, uut Mr. Theilmann's lawyer had come up with a question in the agreement. He said those directly concerned in the agreement would advise the City when this question is resolved and this matter would be put on the agenda again for Council consideration. He said he would not want the Council to take any action on the matter unless all of the parties concerned were in attendance at the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, f•tayor Liebl declared the motion carried_unanimously and the Agenda adopted as presented. Tne City Manager said he would direct the Administration to send written notices to all those concerned with the Rice Creek Estates Plat when there would be further discussion or action by the Council. He repeated, tnose concerned would be advised by letter. VISITORS: Mayor Liebl asked if anyone present wished to address the Council and there was no response. � i „. r �i REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 1, 1974 OLD BUSIVESS: . CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF DIRECTIONAL SIGN FOR UNITY HOSPITAL: PAGE 2 I25� The Assistant Engineer, Mr. Dick Sobiech, addressed the Council and explained the background on the requests for variances for two signs, one, a directional sign and the other an emergency sign. He said the directional sign variance request was from a six square foot sign to a 24 square foot sign. He said the next sign, the emergency sign, request was from ' six square feet to 75 square feet. He pointed out a diagram of the emergency sign to the Council. He advised the Counci7 that the Board of Appeals had recommended the directional sig� from six feet to 24 feet, be denied, and the Board of Appeals had tabled the request for the variance for the emergency sign, from six to 75 square feet. • ! l Mayor Liebl said the emergency sign variance had been approved at the last meeting of the Council. The City Manager said the item had been brought back to the CounciT because there had been no mention of the directional sign at the last meeting and the petitioner ' had requested approval of both of the signs. ; P1r. Charles Peugh, Signcrafters, addressed the Council and said the directiona7 sign would � be far enough back from the street to not interfer with vision and it would not be in the driveway. ' t�lr. Peugh explained the other directional sign would be to direct de7iveries, employees, and those wishing to find the auditorium. One of the purposes of the sign wou7d be to _ notify the visitors to the hospital that this is not the enirance for visitors af patients. He explained if someone visiting a patient parked and tried to enter this seciion, they would have to walk around the building because this entrance is usually locked. Councilman Breider said he had a question concerning the elimination of problems with additional iraffic on Lyric Lane, He recalled in the original plannirg of the addition to the hospital, there was a cut from two to one entrance to the hospital on Lyric Lane. He said if the proposal is looked at in light of all of the exits and entrances to the hospital, . this would be needed for direction. Counci7man Breider further commented that the hospital was merely implementing the present plan to meet the requirements of the City to direct the traffic to Osborne Road and not Lyric Lane. He said he could not see any problems with the proposed signs. MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the variances for both the directional and the emergency signs as requested by Unity Hospital. Seconded by Counci7man Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Ptayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. WEW BUSINESS: RECEIVING TNE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20, 7974: FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #74-02, DAVID COPPERNOLL: PER FRIDLEY CITY CODE E ION .+ i LLI vi �VI u� ��GYIJCU HUUIIUK SUBDIVISIOy N0. 10, THE SA�iE BEIN6 1328 66TH AVENUE N E• The City Manager pointed out this request was for a special Use permit and the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the request with three stipulations. He said this construction would be a shed. �10TION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the request for the special use permit as requested by Mr. David Coppernoll for 1328 66th Avenue N. E., for the construction of a storage building and with the three stipulations as recorimended by the Plannit�g commission. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting aye, i•iayor I:iebl declared the motion carried unanimously. TREE ORDINANCE: Mayor Liebl referred to the recommendation of the Pianning Commission and said the Comnission had indicated the tree ordinance as petitioned would not be acceptable, and they recormnended the staff come up with a draft of an ordinance which would be warkable and acceptable by the petitioners. The City Manager said the ordinance had been prepared and he hoped that it could be reviewed the next week and presented to the Council:at the next regular meeting: He said the staff had been working on the response to the Planning Commission.request. ' ' ' ' ' ' u ' L.J __ , ' u � � ' ' , � ' 12� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL l, 1974 PAGE 3 � MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of ' I March 20, 1974. Secor�ded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, 1 Mayor.Liebl declared the mot9on carried unanimously. i � � Councilman Starwalt said he had attended the meeting of the Planning Commission and he , � commended Chairman Fitzpatrick on the handling of the meeting. He said it was practical ; with no heated discussions and very informative. He said the staff and the Planning Commission had worked diligently to research the matter. ' ' � J �J � ' , RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 27, 1974: CONSID TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDING OF BRICK AND CONCRETE FOR The Assistant Engineer said this request was for an addition to the existing building at 7891 Elm Street and the matter was being discussed for a number of . variances within the minutes of the Board of Appeals also. He explained the request for the variances in the side yard set back to be from 20 to zero feet. t�layor Liebl read aloud the stipulations as recommended by the Building Standards- Design Control Subcommittee. Couniclman Breider asked if the construction as requested would follow the plan for the area. "�r. Sobiech said yes. He pointed out the location of the proposed construction on an area map. Mayhor Liebl said this building would fit into the overall development of the area. The City Manager said the building on the other side of the property in question would be built by Mr.Uick.Harris and he had agreed to building a similar structure with a common wall.� Councilman Utter questioned if the building would be free standing without the use of the existing wall. Mr. Paschke, Paco Masonry, said this was correct. He said the construction of the Harris bui7ding would not abut this presently being proposed structure. Mr. Paschke said he has more projects in the area, and they would have to be seen to understand the implications of the plan. He said this type of plan would eliminate the trash containers being placed between the buildings, the sidewalks from the building to the street and the on street parking. He stressed this type of construction with the parking in the back of the building discourages on street parking. He said all of the green area would be on one side. Councilman Breider said he would have no objection to the construction of the building. ' He added, the usage of the lots of the area has intrigued him, in order to construct . a good size building, one would have to purchase the whole block. He said this type of construction has made some substantial improvements in the area. ' Councilman Nee questioned the instal7ation of only three parking stalls. He added, some businesses of this size are required to have 11 to 12 stalls. He said he did not know what kind of business would need only three parking stalls. ' The City Manager said it is only in the industrial areas that this kind of parking limitation' is used, He eXplained the requirements in the commercial areas would be much i�igher. He further explained in the small manufacturing business, there may . be only two to three employees. The City Manager said the three buildings would be very contiguous and they had tried to work this out with the zero setbacks: The ' City Manager questioned the possible installation of the seven parking stalls. Mr. Paschke explained there is a great difference (202 feet) in setback between the large building and this building. He said the cars couTd.be stacked and seven spaces could be installed. � ' ,� MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the request for the bui7ding as requested by Paco Masonry for 7891 Elm Street N. E. with the four stipulations recommended by the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P�9ayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Breider said the remainder of the requests for the construction of this building from the minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of March 26, 1974 shou]d be taken care of at the present time. e REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 1, 1974 PAGE 4 1�? . REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF: SECTION 205.134, 46, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE (From minutes of Board of Appeals Meeting of March 26, 7974.) MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the variance requests as made by Paco, Incorporated to allow the construction of a building at 7891 Elm Street N. E. Seconded by Councilman Utter, ilpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the rnotion carried unanimously. MOTIOP� by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Contro] Subcommittee Meetang of Marc#� 21, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, f�layor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously, RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1974: EST FOR VARIANCES OF: SECTION 205.065, 2, FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE 065 � �B Mayor Lieb7 summarized the requests of the applicant and said the recommendation of the Board of Appeals was that the hard surface driveway be instal7ed.one year from the present time: - Mr. Larry Miller, 7889-91 Firwood Way N. E, addressed the Council and explained the reason he was requesting the variance is because the driveway is on the property line between his and the adjoining lot. He explained the adjacent property owner to be a widow who does not have a garage and could not handle the expense of half of the driveway. He pointed out that due to the energy crisis, oi7 and the materials required for the installation of the driveway had increased in price and decreased in supply to the contractors. � Mr. Miller advised the Council that Mr. Darrel Clark, Community Development Admin- istrator, had suggested to him to request the insta.11ation of the crushed rock rather thah leave the drive with no surface at all. Mr. Miller said he would like to put in gravel with some binder in it. Ne explained the feelings of the Board of Appeals that the crushed rock wou]d be spread onto East River Road and thrown about by tlie traffic. Mayor Liebl said he would suggest the Council grant the variances, and also extend the time period for the installation of the hard surface driveway to two years because of a financial hardship. He pointed out that it is required by the City that all new constructions put in a hard surface driveway. Ne said this is important for the maintenance of the streets and sewers of the City. Mr. Miller said he would be willing to put in some sort of stable material. He explained a neighbor had insta7led some material which was not suitable and his snowblower picked it up. He said the same neighbor tried another material and this seems to be stable enough to not be picked up by the snowblower. • Councilman Nee said he had also visited the site and this was on a very wet day and the present driveway was not soft, but, v ery firm. He said he would also want the driveway paved someday, but he was happy t�o hear that there was a garage being built there. He continued saying he woulanot want to add this financial burden to the property owner at the present time, F}e mentioned the drainage conditions to be such that the driveway would not drain into the street, and this would be no problem in this area. He said the excess water flows in a drainage ditch. �•lOTION by Councilman Nee to grant the variances requests by Mr. Larry Miller for the , I C; u � , i ' � i I I ' I � II _ , I i 'I � � i ' I , , � ' ; i ' i � , � � � ' ' 128 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1974 PAGE 5 construction of a double detached garage with no restrictions on the surface of the driveway. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the mot.ion carried unanimously. Councilman Nee said he would not want the motion to contain any reference to the installation of the surface material, h� believed the present surface would be sufficiently firm and very solid. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205,053, 4C, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE_ REAR YARD SET BACK FROM 25 FEET, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A UWELLING T BE LOCATED ON LOT 1 BLOCK 7, INPlSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 1412 NORTH INNSBRUCK DRIVE N. E., fRIDLEY, b1INNES07 . REQUEST BY MR. CURTIS JOHNSON, 2300 . 1 ChAt CTDCCT MTM1IM1tCAO(11 TC WtTM11�fCC(1T . • The City Manager recalled the Council had taken action on this request before the request was considered by the Board of Appea7s, and the Council action had indicated the Council would concur in the decision of the Board of Appeals. He explait�ed the Board of Appeals had approved the request for the variance. MOTION by Councilman Utter to concur with the recorr�nendation of the Board of , Appeals and approve the variance request by Mr. Curtin Johnson, for the construction of a dwelling at 1413 Innsbruck Drive N, E. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, al] voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. ___—i . MOTION by Councilman Nee to concur with the recommendation of the Board of Appeals ' and approve the request for variances as requested by Mr. Kenneth Lehr, 168 7almadge Way N. E. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, a77 voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimous7y. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF: SECTION 2]4.0315, FRIDLEY CITY SIGPJ ORDINANCE, t0 ALLOW , A ROOF SIGN TO BE ERECTED IN A M-2 ZONING DISTRICT, AI�D, SECTION_214.056, 1, TO ; I CREASE THE MAXINiUM SQUARE F00 GE F AN IDENTIFICATION SIfN FROM 80 SQUARE fEET TO , 0 The City Manager advised the Council that the Board of Appea7s had recommended approval � of the request for the sign. MO7ION by Councilman Nee to concur in the recommendation of the Board of Appeals and � grant the sign variances request by i�lidland Cooperatives. Seconded by Councilman ' Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl dec7ared the motion carried ' j unanimously. I I A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF: SECTION 205.134, 4B, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE � , KIRKk�00D LANE, MIN(VEAPOLIS, PIINNESOTA 55442): ' The City Manager said this item had been taken care of earlier in the meeting during the discussion of the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee meeting and the requests for the variances had been approved. A REOUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.103, 4. Bl, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO DECREASE , i The City Manager said there was no action necessary on this.item at the present time. ION � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL l, 1974 EST FOR VARIANCES OF SECTION 214. �1y... PAGE 6 TO INCREASE THE FEET TO 24 SQUARE ALLOW THE ERECTIO. �0, SECTION 1 ,_ EY, r1INNESOTA. Mayor Liebl said this request had been taken care of earlier in the meeting when the Council acted to approve both requests. MOTIOV by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee meetirig of March 26, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 4, 1974: M07ION by Councilman Utter to receive and concur in the minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission.meeting of March 4, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Uoon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. . RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1974: MO7ION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Fridley Human Relations Committee meeting of February 21, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, i�iayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Lie61 asked the other members of the Counci7 if he would be authorized to appear before the Committee as the minutes indicated the Committee had requested. The Council concurred in approval of Mayor Liebl's appearance before the Humarr Relations Committee. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION OF MARCH 12, 1974: MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality Cormnission of March 12, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, ��layor Lieul declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Nee questioned if there had been any action or determination on the disposal permit for an industry in Fridley. Mayor LiebT asked if this would be the Onan plant. He said this permit have been approved by the Federal authorities and the P. C. A. - The Assistant Engineer explained the material to be disposed of as water that is used in the cooling of the firm's equipment. Ne said the water had been determined safe because it did not raise the temperature of the creek water beyond the temperature level set. Councilman Nee said he would like the background on the conservancy ordinance and the City Manager said this would be provided to the members on the Council, RECEIVING REPORT OUTLINING THE CONCERNS AND POSITIVE ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY REGARDING THE PRESERVA ION OF RICE GREEK A LOCKE L KE FROM 1955 TO PRESENT: AND RECEIVING STATUS REPORT REGARDING THE CITY OF FRIDLEY REQUEST 70 THE RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT.REGARDING STUDIES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF RICE CREEK AND LOCKE tAKE: Mayor Liebl said the staff has furnished the Gouncil a report which includes a]1 of the action of the City since 1955. He explained this information included a reference check for all available material concerning the Rice Creek and Locke Lake areas. He said the recommendations in the consultants' survey were gond ones and the recommendations in the Assistant Engineer's report were excellent. MOTION by Gouncilman Nee to express support of the Hickok study proposal for Phase I which would include Public Nearings, staff ineetings and discussions with the people of the area. Seconded by Councilman Breider. • Councilman Starwalt questioned the expenditure for the phase one and phase two programs as explained by the Consultant. Mayor Liebl said the City would share the cost with the other governmental groups involved. Councilman Nee said i:his would not indicate that Fridley would be paying the amount alone, they would just express support of the program. ' �� ' � ' ' ' ' , , C' ' �� ' ' �� , � 134 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL l, 1974 PAGE 7 The City Attorney said the Rice Creek Watershed District may have the funds to completely take care of the project from their general budget. Councilman Nee said it would take sometime for the Fridley staff to provide the necessary information to the Watershed District. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Nee said he would like the report which was compiled by the Assistant City Engineer, �-Ir. Dick Sobiech, to be distributed to all of the people of the area. He stated, this was well done. Mayor Liebl said this should be sent to the people on Rice Creek also and the members of the Locke Lake Home Owner's Association. RECEIVING REPORT REGARDING IMPROVING RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE vr[rcHi lUl�' Mayor Liebi asked the Liquor Store Manager, Mr. Bob McGuire, if he agreed with the contents of the report. Mr, f�cGuire said he had met with the City Manager and the Finance Director and he concurred with everything 9n the report. Councilman Breider said he thought the report presented a good proposa7 and the net profit in the plan would be 122% and this is what the Council had asked the Administration to prepare, Ne stated when the two managers accept taking a reduciion in salary, he believed it would also be possible to negotiate with the remainder of the employees when and if the contract comes due, and there is or is not an increase in the profits of the operation. He said if the stores begin making a profit, their salaries could be increased. He stated he believed these salaries should be based on performance, and if the performance was not satisfactory, things could get tough. He said the Manager should inform the people and determine•if the performance is adequate. Councilman Nee said he was,impressed with the fa�t that the Manager and Assistant Manager had agreed to the decrease in salary to eliminate the decline in profits. He quoted "a camel is a horse that had been designed by a committee", and commented he felt the Council should review the report and not run the operation. He said he could not see where the municipal operation could be run to compete with the private business with their many intriguing wines and expensive stock which is not fast moving. He said the municipal operation would not be able to put together parcels like the private operation could. He hoped the members of the Counci] were co�nizant of this fact, Councilman Nee said he felt the report presented is a good set of guidelines and he would like to adopt it for operation. P10TION by Councilman Nee to adopt the "Report Regarding ImQroving Return on Investment in the Municipal Liquor Store Operations" as a guideline for the liquor operation. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Councilman Breider said he believed the Council should make a monthly review of the liquor store operation. Mayor Lieb7 said the operation has an annual audit. Mr. McGuire said the quarterly report would be submitted, and this would give the Council the financial statement every three months. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion"carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF FUNDING THE NUCLEUS CLINIC: Mayor Liebl read aloud the recommendaiion from the staff prepared by the Administrative Assistant, Mr. Peter Herlofsky, which was in the Council Agenda. MOTION by Councilman Utter concur with the recommendation of the Administrative Assistant and authorize a contribution of $1,000 to the Nucleus Clinic - North Suburban Youth Service Center, this year with reconsideration of additional contribution after the findings of Anoka County are received. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Councilman Starwalt said he could not support such a move for various reasons. He expressed concern of the Center keeping information from parents of those who are patients at the Center, saying this weakens the family structure. He said his second concern is the lack of the Center to make a concentrated effort to collect fees from the people attending the Clinic. Mrs. Fitzpatrick said the Center has begun to collect fees from the people obtaining aid at the Clinic. She recalled a recent evening where 24 patients were in attendance at the I�l REGUlAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL l, )974 PAGE 8 clinic and the Clinic collected $77 in fees. She explained this had been started because the Clinic was {oy�ed to hire a doctor. She further explained, they had planned on receiving volunteers, but was unable to do so, and a doctor had to be hired. � Councilman Starwalt asked if there was any change in the confidentuality between the � young people and their parents. Mrs. Fitzpatrick said she could understand the ! concern of Councilman Starwalt, but if the young people were able to go to their parents, they would not be there in the first place. She said this is an imporiant part �f the ' operations, She stated, the young people come to the Center and not to their parent5. ' She said she could understand the concern, it was an obvious one. Mrs. Fitzpatrick , said the unity of the family has been broken before this time, or they would not be at the clinic, t��ey wou7d be home. Mr. Raymond A. Creegan, 5780 East River Road said this type of confidentuality would only be in one instance of operation, There are other aspects of the Center which involve the entire family in conseling sessions. ,He said here, the family would be treated as a unit and the problems worked out in the family unit. � UPON A ROLI CRLL VOTE, Mayor Liebl,.Counciiman Utter, CounciTman Nee and Councilman Breider voting aye, and Councilman Starwalt voting nay, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried four to one. RECEIVING REPORT REGARDING LETTER FORM ANOKA COUNTY REGARDING ALARM SYSTEM: MOTION by Counci7man Breider to receive the report from Anoka Cpunty regarding the alarm system dated March 73, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Up�n a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #39-1974 - ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 974-4: , MOTION by Counciiman Starwalt to adopt Resolution #39-1974, ordering improvement, approval of plans andordering advertisement for bids, Street Improvement Project St. 1974-4. j' Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, ai1 voting aye, Mayor Lieb7 declared j . the•m�tion carried unanimously. . RESOLUTION #40-1974 - CHANGING WATER AND SEWER RA7ES: Councilman Utter asked if the sewer rates would ba reduced and the water rates increased. The Finance Director said the water rates vaould be 28% higher than at the present time.. He said the water has lost money and the sewer system had gained money. Councilman Utter questioned if with the reduction of the sewer rates, would the City be able to meet its obligations. The Finance Director said yes. He explained that the SAC charges had been built into the system, now, they would be handled as a previous payment. MOTION by Councilman Nee to adopt Resolution #40-1974 changing water and sewer rates. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, a]1 voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #41-1974 - TO CONVEY TO THE S7ATE OF MINNESOTA CERTAIN LANDS CONVEYED IN 1971 TO HE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR PONDING PURPOSES, THEN 70 REPURCHASE FROM TNE STATE OF MINNESOTA 7 APPRAISED UALUE FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRADIP�G SAID LOTS FOR LAND TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF CITY PARK JUST ACROSS TNE STREET TO THE SOUTH: HARRIS LAKE ESTATES : The City Manager explained these lot5 had been obtained by the City for the purposes of drainage in the area. He referred to the plat to the south, Narris Lake Estates, and Lots 1 and 2 and said this would allow for a much larger park. The City Manager continued to explain the City would not be able to sell or�trade the lots because they had not paid the appraised value for them. He said the City would give the lots back to the State and rebuy them in order to sell or trade them to the deve7oper for the ]arger park installation. He stated the property owner east of Lot 1 is agreeable with this proposal. MOTION by Councilman Utter to adopt Resolution #41-1974 to convey to the State of Minnesota certain lands conveyed in 1971 to the City of Fridley for ponding purposes, then to repurchase from the State of Minnesota at appraised value for the purpose of trading said lots for land to increase the size of a City park across the Street to the south, Harris Lake Estates. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. ' � ' , , LJ ' , ' , ' u � � �� I'� , , � � ' � I � � �� � �' �I � � 132 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL ], 1974 PAGE 9 RE50LUTION #4?.-1974 - AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCELS 40, 80, 140, AND 240, LOTS -3, DTT R S SUBDIVISION N. 52: MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #42-1974 authorizing and directing the splitting of special assessments on Parcels 40, 80, 740, and 240, l.ots 1-3. Auditor's Subdivision No. 152. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously, RESOLUTION #43-19i4 - AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLI7TING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL 7200, SEC7ION 3: MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #43-1974, authorizing and directing the splitting of special assessments on Parcel 7200, Section 3. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P1ayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimous7y. A member of the audience addr.essed the Council and asked if it would be possible to take action on the last item on the agenda at that time rather than waiting. Mayor Liebl said this item could be discussed at the present time. RECEIVING A REPORT REGARDING THE SUBMISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL gUALITY COUNCIL RE6ARDING NORTH PARK PROJECT BY THE CITY: The City Manager recalled the action of the Counci7 when they had advised him to submit the Brauer Report, Comprehensive Plan, and also the Comprehensive Park Plan to the Environmental Quality Council as an assessment statement. He coniinued the staff had tried to comply with the outline they had received from the Council. He recommended the Council receive the information and authorize the Administration to submit the material according to the outline to the Environmental Quality Council. He said this would be taken care of by the Environmental Quality Council the first meeting in May. MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the staff report and authorize the Administration ' to submit the statement to the Environmental Quality Council for their review in May, Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. ' , � ' ' ' ' CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO CATV COMMISSION: Mayor Liebl said he had talked with Mr. Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street, and he was willing to serve another term. MOTION by Councilman Breider to reappoint Mr. Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street N. E., to the CATV Corranission for another three year term, Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS: . GENERAL 35717 - 35270 LIQUOR 8754 - 8785 MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the claims. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES: F000 ESTABLISHMENT: 7 - Eleven Store 1315 Rice Creek Road Fridley, Minnesota .OFF SALE BEER 7 - Eleven Store 1315 Rice Creek Road Fridley, Minnesota BY James P. McConnel James P. ��Ic Connell APPROVED BY FEE Health Inspector $8.3Q (pro-rated) Public Safety Director $15.00 Health Inspector --, MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the licenses listed above. Secbnded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. I e REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL l, 1974 COiVSIDERATION OF HOUSE TRAILER APPLICATION - S& S TRAILER REPAIR: PAGE 10 , i�a. h10TI0N by�Councilman Utter to approve the application for the House Trailer Repair for 5256 7th Street N. E., FridTey, requested by Thomas E. Jones. Seconded by Counci]man Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, al•1 voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimous]y. ESTIMATES: Comstock & Davis, Inc. yonsulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" ,Minneapolis, :•tinnesota 55432 PARTIAL Estimate #13 for Water Improvement Project No. :111 from February 4. through March 1, 1974 PARTIAL Estimate #2 for Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 114 from February 4, 1974 through March 1, 1974 Lee Electric Company 3775 Highway 52 Robbinsdale, Minnesota 55522 FINAL Estimate #8 for Electrical Contract for Fridley Off-Sale Liquor Store $ 282.15 $ 6,945.62 $ 3,465.97 MOTION by Councilman Nee to approve the estimates as listed above. Seconded by Counci7man Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the mation carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF FORWARDING COMMUNICATION TO F. C. C. RE UESTING ACTION ON THE CERTIFICATE COMPLIANCE FOR CATV FIRM: The City Manager explained the Chairman of the CATV Commission had called the City and requested the Administration make an attempt to hurry along the F. C. C. in granting the certification to General Television. He said the City has requested the F. C. C. to proceed as soon as possible and if the letter would be authorized, it would be he]pful. MOTION by Councilman Breider to forward the communication to the F. C. C. requesting action on the Certificate of Compliance for the CATV firm. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the mot9�n carried unanimous.ly. COMMUNICATION: MINNESOTR HIGNWAY DEPhRTMENT: SIGNALS QN T. N. #65 AT WEST MOORE LAKE DRIVE: MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the communication from the Minnesota Highway Department concerning the signals on T, H. #65 at West Moore Lake Drive and dated March 18, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, al7 voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Ttie City Manager said he would like to be authorized to write a letter of concurrance to the Highway Department. CITY ASSESSOR� NOTICE OF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEETING ON MAY 21, 1974: MOTION by Councilman Utter to set the date for the Board of Equalization Meeting of May 21, 1974. Seconded by Counci7man Breider. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimous7y. OTHER ITEMS: RFCfIUING A REPORT REGARDING THE SUBMISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 70 ENVIRONMENTAL s�:: ITY COUNCIL R[GARDING NORTH PARK PROJECT BY THE CITY: I:`::u report was received by the Council and the Administration was directed to send the x�port to the Environmental Quaiity Council earlier in the meeting. ' ' ' � ' �� � � �� _J � �_� — ' , i ' � ' � ' � 134 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETIN6 OF APRIL 1, 1974 PAGE 11. ADJOURNMENT: Mi►TION by Councilman Utter to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of April 1, 7974 adjourned at 10:52 P,M. Respectfully submitted, �� 1p �. • Patricia Ellis Secretary to the City Council ate Approved Frank G. Liebl, Mayor : , � I r � � � I� FRIDLEY CIT COUNCIL MEE7ING Y PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND I1'EM NUMSER IiVTERESTED IN DATE: C,,e � � � 7 ,1 �� ���-��. �-�� - NAME ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER _______________________________ � _-_____________-_________________-____-________-__-__--______=� % ��. � ���� /�� � ��.-►� �/ ,�� � sy�a �- � U _ �- �„ '.��{% - z. �f - � � /3z -�6 %�_ Z-z a,� � ��7;0.� ��' �' 9 � �� �✓�%�/. �. Y - �/r� ;----�--�= - �, .> > � � / �� ZV � � f,� � /'�i9`/�' �7� 8`S� 6�� (�. s�sd C- � �=� � � ;-, �� �- � ; �: � �. / -L//� — /� �•� � FRI�LEY CITY COUi�CIL � REGULAR MEETI�JG � APRIL 1, 1974 - 7:30 P,M, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE; I yVOCAT I OfV : ROLL CALL: P��Sti�TATIOiV OF AWARD ; CERTIFICATE DF APPRECIATION: i�iR GARY ST I MMLER PARK AND i�ECREATION COMMISSION aPPROVAL OF i�l I �dUTES : PUBLIC HEARING T`�EETING, MARCN 11, 1974 �w AllOPTIO� OF AGEiVDA: VISITORS: CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA� �15 MINUTES) REGU LAR h1EET I �JG, APR I L 1, 1974 OL� BUS I iVESS : PAGE 2 t,ONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF DIRECTIONAL SIGN FOR UN I TY HOSP I TAL � � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � 1 - 1 C i�EW BUS I fVESS : RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF i'�ARCH 2�, 1974 � � � � � . � � � � � � � � 2-2X u REGEIVING THE MINUTES�OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS � �ESIGN �ONTROL MEETING OF MARCH 21, 1974� �.�,��� 3 ' . . REGULAR i�EETING, APRIL l� 1974 • �VEW BUS I I�ESS �CONT I NUED ) REGEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEET I NG OF MARCH 26, 1974 � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PARK AND RECREATION �OMMISSION i'�EETING OF MARCH 4, 1974� � � � � � � . � RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY IIUMAN RELATIONS �OMMITTEE MEETING 0� FEBRUARY 21, 1974� �.����� , � RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY �OMMISSION ��EETING OF �'�ARCH I2, 1974� ���� PAGE 3 4-4P 5-5D • • � 7-7J � n rt�GULAR � f�EET I(dG, APR I L 1, 1974 RECEIVING REPORT OUTLINING THE CONCERNS AND POSITIVE ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY REGARDING THE PRESERVATION OF RICE CREEK AND LOCKE LAKE FROM 1955 TO PRESENT �IVOTE; ATTACHMENTS ARE IN AGENDA FOLDER) PAG E 4 AND � RECEIVING STATUS REPORT REGARDING THE CITY OF . FRID LEY I�EQUEST TO THE RICE CREEK WATERSNED • �ISTRICT REGARDING STUDIES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF RICE CREEK AND LOCKE LAKE � � � � � . � . . . . . . S - g G I�ECEIVING REPORT REGARDING IMPROVING RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE OPERAT I ONS � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . 9 , � 0 CONSIDERATION OF FUNDING OF P�UCLEUS CLINIC� ���.� IO 0 , . ��GULaR f�EETING, APRIL 1, 1974 PAGE 5 1 � I�EW 1��511��E$S i�ONTINUED) � ' ' RECEIVING REPORi' REGARDING LETTER FROM ANOKA _ COUNTY REGARDING ALARM SYSTEM � � � � � � � � � � � , 11 11 D , . . , . . , ' _ �ONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING. IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ' ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT ^ PROJ ECT ST , 1974-4 , , , , , , , , , , ; , , , , , , 12 12 A 1 � - 1 1 . 1 CONSIDERATTON OF A RESOLUTION CHANGING �IATER ' AND SEWER RATES � , � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � � . 13 - 13 � � . , , ' � , ' ' I � i�EGU LAR MEET I IVG, APR I L 1, 1974 I�EW BUS I I`�iESS �CONT I N UED ) CONSIDERATIOP� OF A RESOLUTION TO CONVEY TO TNE STATE OF �`�1NNESOTA CERTAIN LANDS CONVEYED IN 1971 TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR PONDING PURPOSES, TNEN TO REPURCHASE FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AT APPRAISED VALUE FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRADING SAID LOTS FQR LAND TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF A CITY PARK �UST ACRESS THE STREET TO THE SOUTH� ����.� PAGE 6 14 CONSIDERATION Of A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND �IRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPcCIAL ASSESSME�[TS otv PARCELS 4O, 80, 14�, AND 240, LoTS 1-3, AUDITOR�S SUBDIVISION I�O, 152 � � � � � � � � � � � � 15 - 15 A � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND �IRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL �200, $ECTION 3 , . � � ; � � � � � � � � � 16 � REGULAR MEETIi�G, APRIL 1, 1974 PA6E 7 � I�IEW BUSIIVESS �CONTINUED) I , � CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTME T 0 CATV 0 N T �OMMISSI N� �� 1% � " ' � ' - . � � �LAIMS� � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Ig � ' , ' LICENSES , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 19 r � . ,. � CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE TRAILER APPLICATION - S & S TRA I LER REPA I R , � � � � . . . . � . , , . � � � ZO ' !ky ' • , ' . .. .. . . . .. �STIMATES � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' � � � � � � � � , 21 � 21 B . . 1 � 1 � � � - � � REGULAR MEETING, APRIL 1, 1974 I�EW BUSII�ESS �CONTI.NUED) CONSIDERATION OF FORWARDING COMMUNICATION TO FCC �EQUESTING ACTION ON THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR CATV FIRM� � � � � � � � � � + � � � PAGE 8 22 COh1f�lU i� I CAT I OIdS : � MINNESOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: SI.GNALS ON T�H� �6S AT WEST MOORE LAKE DRIVE� � � � . � . � � � 23 CITY ASSESSOR: NOTICE OF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION I�IEETI NG oN MaY 21, 1974. . , . , , • . . , . . , . . 24 �� OTHER ITEf�S: RECEIVING A REPORT REGARDING THE SUBMISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL aSSESSMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL REGARDING ��ORTH PARK PROJECT BY THE CITY� .� 25 : 1 ►1 ° , . , .�_. _ : . � -� �, � . � . � - . � , . � � . F "� . � . 'k �. � . ..; � � � -� . � . . . . t�'y� v� � 1 + M,},6 � . . . . . . � �e �� "f 4-�v�~� �A � '}„f'� ! • � -. h� S ` �' 3 t �� �� �s ��'� � . � �.�'� € ; " � . {: ' . . � .. . � �� . � . . .. . . . ' . . . . . .A} i '' .. � . . .� . . � . -. . . . . � / E3 �� . . . . . . . � . . . � . . � . ... .. �. i, . � . � . . . . . � .. —Ii iY.'F✓+ ' �rF??F :s . �_ � � � � � � � �'� � '��� 1 ` ° �. t �:. �: # �� � �j � F � �� � �- ¢��. a� , � > THE MINUTES. OF THE PUBLIC MEARI;�IG MEETING OF t�RCH l l, 19T4 � r �T �� . x.� �� �. _ �� ��. � s_ • ��� ¢� ; ��:�.. ��: � ' � � �j � � = `� . � � � � � � � � � �� �.,�; � � ;� .. � . .� . . � . . . . . � . � � t ���'` �� . . . . . �' �-�� . � . . � . � .. .� � � . � � . . . � � �^ � : , ' �� � � ��� ; : .' : ' y � .� - t�� �. • . . � .. a� {� n .� � . . . � � � A � d4� � �:�f y �fi+. . . .. ' . . K' ' � � p, T� . . . � ; �et3g �� '�°� n,s � ' W e. z�', �i s � 4 r „ t �'. . y•''�'A t�'� . � � - . . . . . . . . � .. 4 � � � . . . . " . . .. � � � .�� tt � �r� �� � �` � • . '�,,� }` ��� . _ +� '�s� > 3 � � ' ` n:' � ` � ;���� �Y y� K � . . . ' � . . . . . . . ... I # _� . . ' . . . . C.'.. . � . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . .. . � ' �'� } i ;, . . . . - . . 4ay �'eS'� �'�,.�� . . � '� � 1 � . . . . . . � ; � � ' • . . . . . . . .. F '�¢ '''� 3 �: . � . . : � � . .. � . � . . x :: �3 y..��a 4; ' . � . • �.� � �� � ': ����� k. , . . . . . . k f. . .. . . . . ��:. �;�. �". � � � A �rt . . . . . �. . � . � . . . � ;:� . . . ' . . .. . . . � .. �� � } � :i � , � -� �� '.� ... . . . � � � � � �. .. . � � � � 4 . } . . . . . . .Y4 ' � . . . � � �q ��..� k�: . i p• r � 'i i � � � ' . , , � �� ���g *: �- :.y� ��` � �, ; �� ��� �" . / f'. `� � (' � � � r� t� �,� ; � � 3 �� , ��� €� s� � ��� S"� ��� � , . , . . . . . . . . .. . , � "x �¢ y";`�M�e . . � . . � � � � ;'t'� 'g w�' -��' '�. . . . - � . . � � .. �. � .. , . . � - ' _ ��� w��� �� ;� � �. � �� . . � . .. . � 3 q ,°, � �'y� � . . . . . . � . _� C, �.� �. z, . - . � �. .. . . . `- s t ': �,� � � ' ��'`�`.„ � €`' f N� ��u � � � � i i . : ; �4 �s ; �s� . : �� . �����, � � �� � '.' ' � t �� �: t x �:�: � f ' : - ��� �'� � _ . --� f r : � . �°`� x : „�,� „ w; � o- � ��� � �° � t ,� � , , �� �� � �,&"�,���:. .�'3,�§,�� � '-f�s ; � � �' ' �" �`;,�'�" ' � � ��'�� , � � - t� � � , ; ��� "' r� " � ,;: � , � � � � �� ` � • � x �� � � t�� � X: � jt � _ l �` `��' � ?R � - .� � . A_ � . . f .6u,�, � Y { � � � , � .� . . � . � � . 3 � Y � sr": ' � . ' . ! � t .�;, � �,`� �, . � �� �' F m � ,. F � � � ; � . � �"� � � { � . :.( _.. f�s'# d ��.y`. £ y � . . � . , '.. . , S ; _ .. , � � ��1 . �• y{'�`i' � _ , _ - . _ „{ ?�!; .L, v k rr + j � �� f q � « t�`' . .. �y'% � , � :i + a 1 � �"� ` � , P � � � �'� H � � �{ t f � t � i*� : . t . � � �r �,: . � � � ��� � � :: ' � � . . �.�' s -� � 4 - y . . . ,. ��+ d �. ?i � . �' 1 . �.P �b £• . ' �..R . � � �. � 4 -. � m `F -}� L Y� ... �N'� ��fi,�,kfy 3 ��� �� M : ... . . . . . . ''.°� ys �� ��� .. � � ¢, � � ' � � ��� Fr .3; �'� +` .. � � i � - - - . � � . - ,. �x � .�r �.� :. ?, � g �s "� ,�; _ " � �_ �.,� � * �, � ,� �: �` � � �� ", y � � , � � �.�, �� �� , � ������r e t� .. .,,. � . � _ � . . p }�`�,��� 4� �� '.. ? � x ' . . - . . . � � � 31 : `. t _ .y ��, � - r .. - k ii. �, ,� , . � . . . . � F � ; � j r� 1 � �r' ? . . . . i .r i- 5 •k 'S, " � ' . ' � . . s � , i i . � � � . . i ,> � � �� e � .s �. . . ,. ' .� � .�.��� � yN, x' f . . � . � � .-'h. � "�' i 4� a . . . . � -. . T�X���$ a�: � . . . I ` re '�' � �v �� � �� � . .. . .. . � , �, � t� � k � � " � � � . ,� R � �, � � .._�g 4 � _"�fw. r t � Z f � � .. � � . . . . . _ . i"f � t"F � . . . , . .. � �} . • � � � t ��` `� � . . F . � � .'�: I �._ . . . - +� xr � '� �� � � . � � � .. � -/ � i ��x � �� ° t � �' } r l. � ;j k � � � . � Y.. fy qt. i . r ... ,. �:' . .�. ,' 15"� ':� } � � ' . � � �� � ' � r ' � ' � : � . ` I � 93� THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF MARCH 11, 1974 The Publ�c H�aring Meeting of the Fridley City Council of March 11, 1974, was called to order at 7:30 P,M. by Mayor Liebl: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Liebl led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ' ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Breider, Councilman Starwalt, Mayor Liebl, Councilman Utter, and Councilman Nee. � MEt•16ERS ABSENT: None. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: , MOTION�by Councilman Starwalt to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded by Cour�ilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PUBLIC HEARING QN FINAL PLAT P. S. #74-01, RICE CREEK ESTATES, BY GOODCO, INC., AND AND RECEIVING PETITION #3-1974, IN OPPOSITION TO PLAT: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to waive the reading of the Public Hearing Notice and open the Public Heari.ng. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, f•1ayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing opened at 7:32 P.M. The City Manager projected a map of the proposed plat on the screen. Mayor Liebl asked the City Manager to present some facts on the proposed plat. The City Manager said the Planning Commisison had reco�nended approval of the plat with some stipulations. He explained there had been some problems with the extension of 61st Street. He continued saying the plat being reviewed needed no additional r�ght- of-way from the property owners on 61st, the cul-de-sac was proposed entirely for the developer's property. He said the requirements of the platting ordinance had been met: He also explained the amount of park land ta be obtained through the plat to be in excess of the normal percentage of area. He said normally for this much area, there would be 4 to 4%2 lots for park and this plat would provide 8 to 82 and the developer is loosing about four buildable lots. � The City Manager said the recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission was that a good size park be developed in the area to serve all the properties bounded by Rice Creek Road, Stinson Boulevard, Old Centrai Avenue, and 61st Avenue. He said the perimiter roads are heavy with traffic and this proposed park would be in the center of the developed area. He said he believed ttiis to be a good place for a park to serve the entire area. , Councilman Utter asked if the cul-de-sac on the extension of 61st Avenue was now on the applicant's property and the City Manager said this is.true. He said the developer would have to dedicate the roadway right-of-way -For the cul-de-sac. The City Manager said this would leave the two lots unbuildable because of the steepness of the terrain and the property being taken for the cul-de-sac.� Mr. Ed Dropps, Pine Tree R�ilders, addt^essed the Council and introduced Mr. Wally Goodroad, and said they had formed Goodco Builders. Councilman Starwalt asked if there had been any agreement worked out between the developer and the property owners of the area. I•ir. Dropps said he had not talked to the property owners. ��e said he was willing to sell twenty feet of his property to the Thielmann5 to make their property buildabl•e. Ha added, the Thielmanns had indicated they did not want to continue the road through their. property at this time. Mr. br.opps said he had proposed a plan which would not continue the roadway through the Thielmann property. • ' ' . -. i y �� � � � � � � � , � � � , . i ' �5i = PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF MARCH 11, 1974 PA6E 2 Councilman Utter said the plat that had been proposed at the Planning Commission Meeting by Goodco, was not accepted by the P]anning Go�unission. He said the Planning Commission had approved the plat.being proposed at the present meeting. Mr. Dropps said he was sorry they were not in attendance at the.meeting of the Planning Commission, but they were under the impression they had attended all the meetings that they were to attend. He said they were not aware of the meeting the previous _ Wednesday, and had thought the Parks and Recreation Meeting of Monday night was the � last meeting. j Councilnan Starwalt asked if there would be any objections by the developer at running Woodside through rather than use the cul-de-sac. ;ir. Dropps said as the rvad is run on the proposed. plat, it is of no use to the development, it is just additional cost. Ht said he believed the access required by the Thielmanns couid be obtained from the east side of their property. He said there is no value in the 135 foot piece of road. Councilman Starwalt said he favored the plan which would allow Woodside Court to be extended .through the Theilmann property and he believed this would be a better plan to continue the development of the entire area. Mr. Dropps explained he had originally come to the City with a plan for 59 lots and now the proposal was to 40 lots. He said all of the 59 7ots were of buildable size and four of them were on Mr. Theilmann's property. He said he had tried not to offend Mr. Theilmann, but now it was time to take a stand. Mr. Dropps commented he had sent a map of the proposal to the Engineering Department and would apply for a variance of from 35 feet to 25 feet for the front yards for the lots on 61st Avenue which would make the lots buildable. The City Manager said there were only two problems to be solved on the proposed pTat, one being the section of roadway through the Theilmann property and the other recomnendation for the park in the southerly section of the plat. He repeated the , Park and Recreation Commission had recommended a large park be created in this area. He explained the proposal to cut Woodside Court through would be a better proposal utility�wise than dead ending the street and utilities at each end of the access. The City Manager said he appreciated the point of view of Mr. 'iheilmann, he wants to live in the area and had been in the location for a long period of time. He said Mr. Theilmann would like the area to remain as it is. The City Manager said he thought the developer and Mr. Theilmann should work something out which would be a better plan. He indicated the proposal would create a better drainage plan and a better utility plan. Councilman Starwalt asked the parties involved if it would be possible for them to get together to reach some agreement. Mr. �ropps replied he did not believe any agreement could be reached, they had tried. He explained Mr. Theilmann wished to keep the area as it is until the time of his retirement. i4r. Uropps said Mr. Theilmann had indicated this is the on7y plan Me would:accept. Mr. Theilmann said he had purchased two acres of Rroperty and he asked why he should sacrifice a lot now after paying taxes on the property for many years with the'plan of creating eight buildable lots in the area. Ne said he did not believe he would be forced to do this for the developers of the abutting property. Councilman Utter said the creation of cul-de-sacs is an additional expense for the City. He said there is a lot which would not be buildable on the Theilmann property if the cul-de-sac is installed for access. He said if this p7an is followed, it would create two additional cul-de-sacs for the City to maintain. The City Manager said he would encourage the two parties to try to work something out which would be good for the corronunity and good for each other. He said they both have needs of the other and would both have to give a little. He stated, they need each othew in order to develop the property. Councilman Starwalt asked what the tax status would be and what provisions would be in effect if this property is divided by the roadway at the present time. The Finance Director, �ir. Marvin C. Brunsell, said he did not know of anyway there could be a delay in paying the taxes and special assessments. He commented there is a two to three year process before the special assessments would be on the tax rolls. "-� , , � i � I j � i � •; . ; E � ! i � ; ; � i i ,� � � L_ 1 � � � � � � LJ � � � � �� ' PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF MARCH 11, 1974 95 �. I . . -� , PAGE 3 . Councilman Starwalt asked if the taxes would be affected before this time. The Finance Director said there would be no appreciable difference in the tax, the big difference would be in the special assessments. The Finance Director said the difference in the taxes would come about by putting the road in, not by platting and installing a. line in a plan. The City Manager said Mr. iheilmann's land is higher than the surrounding land, it will be more expensive to complete the improvements on the Theilmann property alone in the future. He said with the present plan, the assessments would be spread over the entire development and not assessed to the abutting property owners section by section. He said if the improvements are done sinqly the owner of the four higher lots would have to expend the entire amount of the higher priced installation. He said it would be difficult to assess the other people in the future when the assessment would have no benefit to them. Counci7man Utter said the improvements with the raise in costs would be at additional .cost in the future. Councilman Utter asked Mr. Theilmann if he would be able to come into.the City Hall and speak to the City Manager on the methods of funding the current proposal and the reasons why it would be to Mr. Theilmann's advantage to install the ' improvements at this time. He thought if Mr. Theilmann woul.d add the improvements later, the cost would be out of this world. The City Manager said the Theilmann property would be difficult p+�operty to work on. �He explained how there is 25 feet of dirt which would have to be removed before the installation of the improvements. He said at the present time, if it were done all _' �t once , the cost would be minimal He again stressed, the parties should get together and work something out for the good of both of them. Mayor Liebl agreed stating he also thought they should get together before the Council would take any action on the matter pending. P�tayor Liebl asked Mr. Theilmann if he opposed the development of the residential plat as proposed. Mr. Theilman said he was not opposed to the plat. � Mayor Liebl said the proposal of the street pattern would be acceptable to the Council over the long range plan of the area. t�layor Liebl said Mr. Theilmann cannot be forced to develop his property. i4r. Dropps said he was aware of this. Mayor Liebl pointed out that Mr. Theilmann had been a long time resident of the City of Fridley and had paid many tax dollars. - The City Manager said there were three alternatives; one to approve the plan and develop only the property within it; two, to let the property owners work something oui; and three, acquire the needed right-of-way through eminent domain. Councilman Utter asked Mr. Theilmann and the representatives from Goodco if they could • have another meeting which he and Councilman Starwalt would attend. Mr. Theilmann said he is home every evening and this would be agreeable with him. Councilman Starwalt said it seemed it would be advantageous for Mr. Theilmann to • , allow the road to go through at this time rather than dead end it. 'Mr. Theilmann said he is no�drbe involved�in theudevelopmentroflthegareasinethedfuture. amount of increase that wou Mr. Theiimann said he would like to go over this point with someone at the City. Councilman Starwalt said the plat could be adopted as it is being presented with the dead end, but Mr. Theilmann would have to agree to pay the incurred costs for the improvements at the future time of development. � Councilman Nee asked the amount of cutting that would have to be done for this improvement and asked if the elevations could be pointed out. Mr. Oropps said Mr. Theilmann wants to sell the fill in the area and after this is dDne, he would sell the property for develoQment. Mr. Theilmann said this is true. The City Manager said the two parties need each other for the plan for the area to be workable. Mayor Liebl asked if there were any others present who would like to make a statement to the Council. Mr. Charles Rice, 1541 Ferndale Avenue, asked if there was any right- of-way on the Rice property, or was all of this being obtained from the developers of the property. (%�ayor Liebl asked Nr. Rice if he had any objections to the p7at as it was being proposed which did not require any right-of-way from the Rice property. Mr. Rice said he would have no objection if the plat did not touch his property. , Mrs. Gloria Arel, 1521 Ferndale addressed the Council and said if the plat does not touch either the Rice Property or her own, she would have no objections to the plat. . �, !. i � i � � ps ., � � � � � � ' � � ' � � .� • , � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF MARCH 11, 1974 PAGE 4 The City Manager said the plat did not touch either of these properties. �ouncilman Breider stated Mr. Theilmann wanted to sell the dirt before the development of the property. He thought there would be an additional cost for the development of the area some point in the future if there is a delay. He asked Mr. Theilmann if he was aware of the expense and limitations on dirt hauling. Mr. Theilmann 3aid this had been done all around him and was well aware of what dirt hauling does. �� --f j . Councilman Starwalt asked why there would be a$20,000 to $25,000 cost to the City � to make a park of this size, ihe City Manager said the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission was to create a large park for the families of the neighborhood. He said when the areas surrounding the present plat are developed, the City would require some amounts of money for development of park. He said this would provide a park large enough to service t}ie entire area in the future. The City Manager pointed out that applicant is dedicating more than the required amount to the City's parks and this property for the amount mentioned would be in'addition to the large dedicated area. Mr. L.arry Lembke, 1505 Ferndale, addressed the Council and said he paid $4,000 for the extra amount of property he nwned. He said if the assessments were put in and he ` sold the property he could only increase his investment by about $2,000 and this would not be a large enough profit, he would rather keep the property. Councilman Starwalt asked Mr. htike 0'Bannon if he had any objections to the plat. Mr. 0'Bannon said he had no objections. Mr. Dropps said he would like to set up a meeting with Mr. Theilmann and the City representatives. Councilman Starwalt said he felt Mr. Theilmann should meet with the City staff first. Mr. Theilmann said he would meet with the City staff,he would make arrangements and tell them when he could make such a meeting. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to close.the Public Hearing. Seconded by Counci7man Utter. Upon a voice vote, all vot.ing aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously, and the Public Hearing closed at 8:45 P. M. Mayor Liebl said the petition in opposition to the plat should be received. Mayor Liebi noted, this is not the plat being discussed at the present.time, this was a previously discussed plan for the plat. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive Petition #3=1974 in opposition to the Rice Creek Estates. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, �dayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. � TION OF COMMUNICATION FROM THE HOUSING COMMITTEE OF THE FRIDLEY V. F. W. - ---- -. _ ......�.-.. rr.,.,nnnv oc lo7n � . MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the communication from the Housing Committee of the Fridley V. F. W., 1040 Osborne Road N. E., signed by Mr. Anton Olson, Commander. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon�a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Andrew Kohlan, Attorney, addressed the Council representing the Fridley V. F. W. Mr. Kohlan said 'ne i�ad visited the facility and talked to the Commander and believed as the letter from the V. F. W. states, the problems arise because of the corrQnon wash room facilities which are used by members of the V. F. W. and also by renters of the facility. He continued, there is interaction because of this and when the facilities are rented, this is the major cause of the problems. He said there is a possibility, in the future, for the V. F. W. to acquire some of the adjoining space• in the building complex and this would lessen the chance of this type of interaction through separation. He said the V. F. W. would be providing additional security to alleviate the current incidents. Mr. Kohlan said the V. F. W. Housing Cortvnittee is sincere in its attemp to aileviate the problems and they realize this will take attention to complete the process. Councilman Breider asked who is leasing the other portion of the building. Mr. Kohlan said this lease is held by a grocery store. He explained the owner of the grocery facility has a year left on the lease with an option of an extension of another year. � He said ther� is also a barber shop in the complex. He explained the circumstances of the V. F. W. obtaiiiing the building with the incompleted leases,.and said there . would be no way of expanding until the other businesses are no longer leasing the building. � � � , f � � I PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF MARCH 11, 1974 �I � � � � r � � � ' � - g� , i r PAGE 5 Councilmarr Breider asked Mr. Kohlan if it was the V. F. W.'s intent to take over the entire building..��tr. Kohlan said not entire7y, but somethin9 could be arranged, this would be to eliminate the interaction in the wash rooms. Councilman Starwalt said he had visited the faci7ity and he believed they were trying to run a proper operation. Mayor Liebl asked if there would be any further action on the matter at the present time. t;ouncilman Breider said he thought the Housing Committee was making a concentrated effort in alleviating the problems, and this is what he was interested in. Mayor Liebl asked if.the points listed in the communication (1 through 4) would be agreeable to the Council as means of satisfying corrective measures for the current problems. MOTION by Councilman Breider to concur in the statements in the cormnunication as listed one through four. Seconded by Councilman 5tarwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBILITY OF INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS ON JACKSON STREET BETWEEN 73RD AVENUE AND OSBORNE ROAD, AND METHOD OF fUNDING THE IMPROVEMENT: Councilman Breider said he had .asked that this item be placed on the agenda to obtain an idea on the Council's thinking on the matter. He recalled the 1971 policy of the City. in establishing sidewalks on residential property and said the money would come from State Aid or the general fund, He said he had asked the City Manager to prepare a cost break- down on the installation of sidewalks on Jackson Street from 73rd to Osborne Road or the Woodcrest School area. He said the grand total for this installation would be approximately $33,145 and he would like to discuss the possible methods of completion of this installtion. The City Manager pointed out the City had a five year sidewalk program. He explained Mississippi Street from Central to Highway #65 had been completed. He said the State Aid roads carry heavy traffic. He said Jackson had been a State Aid roadway, but this had been deleted from the State Aid roads, and now the property owners may have to pay the assessments for such an instal7tion. He explained the property owners did not want this road to be a State Aid roadway because of the additional traffic this would possibly create, bui there is a traffic problem and there is a possibility with the safety factor, State Aid funds may take care of this assessment. He said the general funds could also be used if it is for the good of the entire neighborhood. He said the Council would have to make a�determination on the meth�d of funding and whether or not the property owners should be assessed. He said, originally, this was a State Aid Road, but the people did not want the trucks and heavy traffic, so the State Aid road was changed to Baker Street which abuts the commercial property. He said this roadway does collect traffic because it is the only connection between 73rd - and Osborne in this area. , The City Manager said the Council would have to make the determination on how.the amount that should be done in this area, if anything. He added, at 75th and Jackson the traffic really starts getting heavy and continues this way to the north. The City Manager said there would be two questions; one, if and how much of the roadway should have sidewalks; and, secondly, how much of this should be funded. He said there are three possible methods of installation and funding; one, assessing the abutting property owners including the installation of the walks, replacement of the sod and drives; two, asking the property owners to pick up the cost or installation of the sod and drives with some State Aid funds backing up the funding of the sidewalks; or three, to complete the entire project with funds from the General fund or State Aid Revolving Fund. Mayor Liebl said the sidewalk construction program would meet the criteria of safety of ' the people and pedestrians in route to and from Woodcrest School in this area. He said at the present time, the children are walking on the street. He continued he believed . this area would meet the criteria of 1971. He said according to the resolution, this could be done if there are funds available. He pointed out that there would have to , be a Public Hearing before this imQrovement is approved. i�iayor Liebl said he would like to have more information on the improvement before there would be a Public Hearing. � Councilman Breider said before there is any further discussion or consideration of the matter, he would like to talk to the people of the area. He said at this time, he , wanted the feeling of the Council on the possibility of installation of the sidewalk. He said he would not want the abutting property owners to be assessed completely for • the project because it is the entire Melody Manor area that is using Jackson Street for ', access to the School. r�e said he could not tell the abutting property owners that they ; � � � i � , � •: PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF MARCH 11, 1974 PAGE 6 had to pay for the sidewalk assessments. He explained, the main traffic of the area is on Jackson Street. The City Manager said he would be concerned at the policy followed in a matter such this. He said he could see that this may be a different situation than most of the areas in Fridley, but he would hope that if this i.s done, the Council would layout exactly why it would be done so it does not open the door for other areas to request such improvements. He said this would have to be explained as a special consideration. He suggested doing more homework on the possible installation. He said perhaps, there should be some study on the area to determine the needs. He continued, after this, if the Council feels the area requires special cpnsideration, the question must be answered whether or not the City should take over the 100q funding of the project. He said other areas have been assessed for the sidewalks. Mayor Liebl explained that many of the people in the City do not want sidewalks, and if this is a factor in this area, the City would have to do something to provide safe access to the School. Hw recalled the walkways to Stevenson School had been constructed with funds from the general•fund, He said he thought some work should be done in this area to determine the criteria. � 7he City Manager pointed out another fact for consideration saying in some areas the � property owners were assessed with the understanding that the City would take care of the maintenance of the sidewalks, He said this had been done on Osborne Road and the people were assessed 100%. (�ayor Liebl said he would like to ask the Schoo] District for a count on the number 1 " .of children that are walking from 75th to the north to school. He said this would provide justification for the need. Councilman Breider said again that at the present time he would only want the feeling � of the Council on the possibility of consideration of this construction. He said he would like to talk to the people of the area to determine if they would favor this plan. ., � Councilman Nee said he would like to see a survey of the entire City done if this idea is looked into. He said the improvements should be put in the order of their , priority. He continued saying he thought this improvement wouid be a good thing, � basically. He recalled the City had a plan for the installation of sidewalks and this plan is completed. He said hopefully, there should be another plan prepared with � this area included. Councilman Starwalt said he knew of areas in Ward II with as much justification for the � installation of sidewalks. Councilman Breider said if this is true, ;�e wou]d support � this installation in Ward II also. Councilman Starwalt s�id this also would be determined by the fact if the people had to pay for the sidewalks or not. Councilman Utter asked if the consideration of the plat proposed previously in the meeting, �� Rice Creek Estates, was ti�ere any consideration of the sidewalks on 8enjamin Street. ' He added, there would be a good many young people who would use this Street for access to Gardena School. � � The City Manager said he would look into this area in the overall plan along with any other areas of concern or where there had been requests. MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the report on the costs for the installation of sidewalks on Jackson Street and also authorize the Administration to work up an overall plan which would include priorities at the present time and a long range plan. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOlUTION #35-1974 - AUTHORiZING TNE CHANGING OF BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND SILVER JUBILEE : . MOTION by Councilman Utter to adopt Resolution #35-1974, authorizing the changing of � Budget Appropriations in the General fund (Silver Jubilee). Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. ' Mayor Liebl read the Resolution aloud to the Council and audience. , The City Attorney asked if the Council would take action on the report for appointing a Bi-Centennial Committee. He suggested appointing the current Silver Jubilee Cortmittee � � ,� i I d ' � � � � � � � � � � � � , � � ' � � PUBLIC HEARING MEE7ING OF MARCH 11, 1974 PAGE 7 ! � as the Bi-Centennial Interim Comnittee. He said there had been a meetin9 of the Silver Jubilee Committee that evening and they requested the Council take formal action appointing a Committee in this manner in order to complete the application. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to appoint the Silver Jubilee Car�nittee as xhe Bi-Centennial Interim Committee and that the City Manager be authorized to take the appropriate action. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, I•tayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING REPORT ON POOR REVENUES LOSS SITUATION AT OFF-SALE STORE #2 EAST RIVER ROAD AND 3 TH AVENUE: Councilman Breider asked what the current rent on the facility at East River Road is. Mr. Bob McQuire, Liquor Store Manager, addressed the Council and replied this was $6,300 per year, Mayor.Liebl said the members of the Council had seen the report from the City Manager and his proposed alternatives. He said he would like to make a co�nent explaining his thoughts on the problem. i�iayor Liebl read the following statement: . "TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION FROM THE DESK OF MAYOR FRANK G. LIEBL, March 9, 1974 Since price controls were removed from bottle sales of liquor in July of 1969, operating income from our off-sale stores has gone steadily downward - 1969 - - ��150,000 1970 - - $135,0�0 - - Down $15,000 1971 - - $102,000 - - Down $33,0�� 1972 - - $ 76,000 - - Down $25,000 1973 - - $ 33,000 - - Down $43,000 Net operating loss at store #1 was almost $7,000 in 1972, the last full year this store was open. Store #2 had a net operating loss of almost $8,000 for the fourth quarter of 1973. Since the fourth quarter normally accounts for about one third of the annual operating profit, there doesn't appear to be much hope for recovery at that location. Whatever the reasons, this record makes it obvious that some decisions must be made immediately. Some action must be taken soon to correct the problem, or we must expect to be forced out of the business in the not too distant .future. I sugg�st that the following steps be taken - � 1. Since the Camden bridge was closed, sales at the #2 store have dwindled to practically nathing. To the best of our knowledge the bridge will nat be open for two years. The best solution appears to be to close this store and negotiate the best possible deal for termination of our Tease at that location. 2. I suggest that we consider eliminating the position of Liquor Manager and go to a Store Manager arrangement. We have a purchasing agent who could do the buying. The Store Manager would put in his 40 hours'per week in the store to which he is assigned, Bank deposits and necessary reports could easily be arranged for. Assuming a Store Manager salary approximately $2,000 per year � above that of the clerks and with two full time clerks to each store, the annual payroll should be substantially reduced. Each Manager would be free to make all the necessary decisions relating to schedule of working hours for clerks, sale pricing dead stock, etc. - within guide lines lain down by the City Administration. He would be responsible for successful operation of the store. , . Above action should result in savings to the taxpayer of $30,000 to $40,000 per year . and help raise the net profit to an acceptable figure. If not, we shouid seriously consider getting out of the business. Frank G. Liebl" Mayor Liebl said he had received and read the liquor store reports since 1966 and he was not trying to criticize anyone. He said the liquor sales haye dropped in all comnunities. �•iayor Liebl said he thought the CIty should be Very conscientious in laying out a plan. He stated the City had spent a considerable amount of money 7 l0U PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF MARCH 11, 1974 PAGE 8 in the construction of the new liquor store on Central and this location was fiaving good sales along with the Holly Store. He felt the need to take the proper action and cut down on the overhead of the operation. He pointed out another factor for the loss is the action by the Legislature, saying they had put the City into this situation. He also pointed out that when he viewed the activity at Leon's, the facility was full of customers and they seemed to have beautiful sales there. Mayor Liebl said the Liquor Store Manager and the Assistant Liquor Manaqer had been with the City for from 16 ta 20 years, and they would be capable of managing the two remaining profitable stores. He mentioned some salary arrangement could be made. Councilman Breider said he appreciated the possibilities being pointed out. He asked if there would be a possibility of getting out of the lease at the present facility on East River Road. ��e said he did not feel that taking a loss for the remainder of the lease period would make any sense. Councilman Breider questioned the Finance Director on the possibility of the Pubchasing Agent buying the liquor for the two remaining stores if there was no manager to take care of this. He said originally the CIty had four stores, it is down to three now and proposed for two. Councilman Breider asked what the comparison in the fixed costs would be. The Finance Director asked• if this would be for 1974 and Councilman Breider said yes. Councilman Breider questioned how the labor costs for four stores could be compared to the labor costs for the two stores. He also questioned the fact that the ]abor costs seem to be getting higher for the amount of sales. Councilman Breider said he would not be too excited about the prospect of putting a trial store location on the East Rover Road and Osborne Road. Ne stated the grocery store at this location had gone �broke, the parking would not be adequate, and he would not�want to invest money in this corner. Councilman Breider asked the Finance Director if he could prepare a report and tell the Council how they could obtain a 12� net profit for the liquor sales for 7974. He asked if a plan could be charted out. The City Manager commented, tne deficiencies in the system should be eliminated and the East River Road Store is not making any money. He stressed, something should be done to eliminate the loss. He poirrced out that the sales at Central and a]so Holly are good and he would not want the East River Road facility to eat a]1 the profits away. He explained by just closing the door, the loss would be cut more than half. Ne said there would have to be a plan and he asked the Council if the plan.to close the doors of this store would be feasible at the present time. MOTION by Councilman Breider to instruct the Adroinistration to prepare a plan to show the City Council on how the City can turn the present situation into a net profit of 12% for the 1974 sales and that this be brought back to ;the Council by the first of April and if this inc7udes phasing out non-profitable stores, this would be a part of the plan. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt for discussion purposes. Mayor Liebl said he would accept this as a second to the motion. Councilman Starwalt said he had two questions, would this°be a long or short range plan and what wou�d be done with the East River Road store at the present time. He asked the possibility of an addition to the motion which would indicate that something should be done with the East River Road Store at the present time. Councilman Breider said it was his intent that if the pla�n would call for same present action on closing the East River Road store, this action would be started immediately. He said he would like the City Manager to get in contact with the lease holder on East River Road and determine if something could be worked out. Councilman Starwalt said if this is the intent, he would wholeheartedly second the motion. MOTIOW by Councilman Nee to amend the motioq to prepare the report to add that the Liquor Store.#2 be closed immediately. Seconded by Councilman Breider. • Councilman Breider said he thought this may be within the intent of the first motion. The City Attorney said this was the intent of the first part of the motion. Councilman Breider said he would WITHDRAW HIS SECOND, in this case. Mayor Liebl declared the motion DEAD FOR LACK OF A SECOND. , The City Manager said this would enable him to start phasing out the operation without closing the door immediately. ' ' � .� ; ''.7 � � � , . �.�� � . ` � Y ��i•• I PUBLIC HEARING MEETiNG OF MARCN 11, 1974 PAGE 9 The City Attorney said he interpreted the acinn to mean that if c7osing the #2 Store would be appropriate in the plan of the Administration., this should be done as a part of the plan to obta.in the-12� net profit. i ! The motion was repeated and all concurred in the content. , UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Breider asked Mr. McGuire if it would be possible to turn off the bell in the ' Central Store. ADJOURNMENT: hi0TI0N by Councilman Sreider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Counci7man Utter. ' Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously ' and the Public Hearing meeting of the Fridley City Council of March 11, 1974 adjourned at •10:12 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �r-- . . �i�/�v�t.�r/ Patricia Ellis Frank G. Liebl, i�iayor Secretary to the City Council Date Approved 0 v w � r 5 � •^ � � 7'HE MINUTrS OF THE BOARD Or APPI;AI,S SUBCOr'�1ITTE� MEETING OF Mt1RCH 13, 1974 ' The meeting was called to order by Chairman Drigans at 7:10 P.M. ME1�IBERS PI:EcENT : MEMBERS ALSENT: OTfiEP.S PRES�NT : Drigans, Crowder, Plemel, Wahlberg Gabel Howard Mattson � Engineering Aide MOTZON by TJahlberg, seconded by Cro�vder, to approv e the minutes of the FeUruary 28, 1974 meeting as written. Upon a voice vote,. there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 1� 1. A F.EQUEST FOR VARIAI`CES or SECTI:ON 214.0313, FRIDLEY SIGN ORDINANCE, TO INCREASE TIIE rfA,?:Ir:LT°1 SQ�?�1RE F00'�' �.GT FOR TP.��1 °�C DIF.ECT.IO�`i<'1L S:�GiyS ;�'T:ori 6 s�t�:�RE Fr �T TO � 2�1� SQUAI:r 1' �'i;'i: (SI!iN 7.) �1i�D Fi C:�1 6 SOtT';_� FT:�T TO 75 SntJ1�'�; FrF.T SIGid �r`2�,, '1'0 ALI.O�J TrIE �'"?�,7' � Oi: O��i',:0 '_� P�'LF'� IC T)-� =�.?�C:C:i:O`;��L SIGtiS TO BE LCCATED ON Pr`�'.0 :'LS 600 AND ?_400, Si?C'.L?G,? 11LT-30, R-24, .!=;Oi::'� COLT�;TlT, '�.i�E Stii� BY�.Ii;^v 550 OSE0;1^ F.Q �D I�ORTi�EAST, I:'i'±?`�.i`i, ill:�c;1�SOTA._ (R,r�.,(?UEST BY tT�;XTY �;OSPITr`�, 550.OST�OP�t:E ROAll N,�., F1;TDLEY, iI� i:;i;LSOTA. ' . ri0TI0N by T�Iahlberg, seconded by Cro�ader, to waive reading the public hearing notice. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Charles Peugh, of Signcrafters, Inc., was present to present the request. AZr. Peugh presented sketches of both signs to the Board and also a plot plan of the hospital lot showing where the signs would be located. Mr. Peugh e��plained i.hey require a variance on the size to put up two dixectianal signs; one s�atir�g "Unity �mergency", the other stating "Unity", "Auda.torium", "Truck Deliveries", "Eit�ployee Parkino". He said the color scheme caould be a blue background taith white letters and red arro�as. He said the "Emergency" sign �aould have fJ.uorescent lighting and the other would have scotchlite. The plot plan sho;,red both si;ns located off the Osboxne entxances; the "Emergency ".sign at the mos� easterly entxance a�nd the other at the most we.sterly entrance, both to be placed a� the pxoper setbacks. � Chairman Dxigans said he could see �he "Emergency" sign but why the other sign. Mr. Peugh answexed th«t ihe kids have knocicecl the sign dosan that was there and ' the delivery nien are goi.�zo to the �axong doors. He said the hospital has to have signs.to direct people because"of.�he many entrances. He added one largex sign � is better rhan having many 6 square foot signs. � � � � , . Mr..Crocader stated he could also see the reason for having an "emergency" sign, especially for the traffic at night, but aslced cahy the employees need a sign �elling thetn�ahere to park. Chairn�an Drigans add�d he didn't think the hospital needed a 24 square foot sign €or a deliv ery dixectional sign as he felt the delivery men �aould kno�a where ttiey were to go, because of �ahat they were delivering. Mr. Peugh answered that the deli.�>eries are not made by the same men all the ti.me and the employee parking direction is more for the vistors, to 1et them know they can not parlc there. . Mrs. Wahlberg stated she couldn't see where the delivery men would come to the fexont door when they were delivering food or supplies. She said if you have this sign at tlie entrance, you will need a sign furt(ier in to differentiate betcaeen deliveries. Slie also wanted to question thc �aoxding of "Unity" on the signs instead o£ having "hospital". S2ie felt people �aho were �rom out of town wauld not necessarily l�now "UniL-y" but would l:now "hosPital". She said they don't know that "Unity Emer�ency" t3ould mean hosrital. � . � , i 1 The Minutes of the Board of Apgeals Meeting of March 13. -1974 Page 2 1 A Chairman Drigans stiated he felt the ambulance drivers should know where the emergency doors are raithout having a sign to direct them. rir. Peugh ans�aered thaC tl�e info�.-mation he has comes �xom the hospital as to what they want and apparently they are ha.ving txouble with the drivers. Mrs.. Wahlbexg.said_she is not objecting to the size but to the wording. Mr. Cro�ader asked if the Board �aas to deny the variance, could the hospital put I up 6 small 6 square foot signs. He said his biggest question is if we turn it down, tahat happens. Mr. Mattson read from the Ordinance the requirements on traf�ic directional si.gns and stated there was no maxi.uaum on the number allowed. Mr. Crowder zvondered if they could put 3- 6 square foot signs on the same pole, . Chainnan Arigans asked about the clearance of the signs fxom the ground. �ir. Peugh said both ��ere 4' 6" off the ground. Chairman Drigans stated he felt the Boaxd should consi_der the sa�ety factor of a sign beinQ only 4 feet off the ground. He said aiLy sign that lota Z•ti11 have kids climbing on it. He said that should be considered in the construction of it. He asked �ahy the one post instead of t�ao. Mr. Peugh said he didn`t lcno�a how the lcids would get up on the sign as it is only about 12 inches �aide with no hand holes. He said if you put the sign up to high, it w ill loolc out of_pxoportion. He said the engineers that figuxe these signs out, do tal:e wind pressuxe, etc., into consideration so the sign is sturdy. Iie said an aduii:ional posi; would cost the hospital $200.00 extxa, and he was sure.the sign was stuxdy without it. Mrs. Wahlberg said she objects to the additional square foo�age of the�"emexgency" sign used fo-r decorative design. Mr. Peugh answered tha� it is not just decorative, it is a s�eel cover. . Cha:izman Drigans said he feJt �he sign with a centex post is going to be subject to somebody comin; up and txying.to turn it. He said we have to look at the safety factox with the electrical lighting in a sign that lo�a. ylr. Peugh stated he �'elt this sign with fluorescent lighting is safer than flood lights that are on the ground. ' Pir. Cro�ader s�ated the Board can't force him to change the lighting and the poles as long as ii:. is in conzoxmance wi�h the Codes. Chairman Driga.ns stated that the Board has to protect the public on items that could be satety hazards. � �. . Daxxel Clark, Comsnunity D�velopment Adm., added that the Board could xecommend � the signs be tlie same height as the Ci�y trafiic signs. � ' � Ghai.xznan Dri�ans said that if these si ;ns were appxoved, it could set a preceden� in that any business dotm Osborne Foad could decide they also need•txaffic directional signs. He said he has moxe reser.vaL-ions about the delivery directiorial sign size. He said delivery men change, granted, but employees shouldn't need a sign to te11 them where to park. � Mr. Peugh said the hospital woulcln'L be spending the money tor the signs if they dicln't teel it 3.s necessary.. . � � ' � � � The Minutes of the Board of A eals Meetin of March 13 1974 Pa e 3 1 B PP � • - -�-- Mrs. Wahlberg questioned what signs were existing on the property now. She said she thought th�re was now an emergency sign on the Uuilding and she therefore questioned if this proposed sign is necessary. She said the hospital will probably still�need other signs in the yard. Mr. Plemel stated lie thought the hospital has kept �.ts yards quite nice but to add signs that are this size seem awful garish to him. He said the hospital must think they need it but he couldn't see why they need a sign for employee parking . MOTION by Cxo�ader, seconded by Plemel, to close the public heaxing. Upon a voice vote, thcre being.no nays, the motion carried unanimously. r�:s. �,lahlbexg sta�ed she questioned the size of si�ns being askad for first of , all, but also ques�ioned wha� e.vists noza on the building and if it can be seen fxo;n Osbor.ne P.oad. i-lr. Crotader said, assumir.g they have signs � on the bui.lding now, taha� does the Eoaxd suggest they change the size to. He saic� �he Board ,� agrees that 6 squa.xe feet is too small and 75 squaxe feet to bi� but whaic size is needed ar.d nec�ssary. �irs. �aahlberg stated that �aould be relative to �he speed of the tra�fic and the size of the si�n needed to attract atten�ion. � She said she didn't.lcnow t��hat size is nseded to see at 30 mph but she fe1C there must be �i;ures and studies available. Mr. Matt�son said it also depends on the proximity of th e sign to the r.oad. � , �� � i � 1 , � � � Chairman Dxi.ga.ns stafied one of the probl.ems raith the hospital parking lot is if someone turns the �axong way, it is hard to get to the proper doors because of the curb�.ng. He said he �elt this is poor planning on the hospitals part. He said the size of the signs is one problem and the clearance from the ground is the second problem. Iie sa�d he telt �he Board tias a xight to put stipul2tions on any sign that needs a vaxiance. He said another problem is the single post as he felt it will attract ki.ds to push it. MOTTON by t�7ahlberg, seconded by Plemel, to racommend to the City Council, denial of Sign �fl, to incxease area from 6 squaxe feet to 24 squaxe feet, for the reas�n that the directional signs within the p2opexty itself are sufficien� and the � one on Osborne is no� necessary to g3.ve dixections �o delivery men and employees. Upon a voice vote, Exocader vo�ing nay, the motion caxried. � Mr. Crowder stated his reason ior voting nay is that he feels the hospital could well use the 24 square foot si.gn if they would remove a11 the other signs with the same infoxma�ion. � F_ MOTION by Crowder to reconunend to the Ca.ty Counci.l denial of Sign ��2, having 75 square feeC but to xecommend appxoval of a sign t��ith 50 square feet being used. MOTION DI�D TOR I.�CK 0� A SECOND Mrs. �dahlberg stated she felt tlie only motion she couJ.d see on Sign ��2 was to table iti and checic into studies of �ahat has been shown to be necessary. She said she thought the petitioner has fail.ed to prove this size of a sign is .. • necessary. � MOTION by Wahlbexg, secondecl.by Plemel, to table the variance request on Si�n ��2 until the applicant or studies show a need for a sign this large. Upon a voiCe vote, Cxowder vating nay, the motion caxried. , The Minutes of the Boaxd of Appeals Mee�ing of March 13, 1974 � Page 4 1 � . � Mr.:Plemel asked that rlr. Haines from the hospital appear betore the Board to • answer questions about this size sign. Chairman bri_gans informed Mr. Peugh that the minutes of this meeting would go before the Council on the 18th and if the applicant wanted the Council to act on both sign requests, that he should appear before them. Other�oise the request on Sign ,��2 �aould come back before the Board on March 26th. . AA70URIv�IENT : The meei:ing was adjourned by Chairman Drigans at 8:30 P.M. Respectf-ully submitted, � � c, �. �I��? -'�.,_! C/� MARY �Il:r:�rz � � � Secretary ' . � . 0 � �� � � , � C� � ' L _J ' r ' I � �J , CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING CONiMISSION MEETING MARCH 20, 1974 CALL TO ORDER: - . 2 � PAGE 1 Chairman Fitzpatrick called the meeting to order at 8:10 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Fitzpatrick, Harris, Lindblad, Blair, Drigans. Members Absent: None � Others Present: Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator Brother Thomas Sullivan, Vice Chairman of the Environmental Quality Commission - Paul�Brawn, Director of the Parks & Recreation Department APPROVE PLANNING COMI�IISSION MINUTES: MARCH 6, 1974 MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission approve,the minutes of the l�arch 6, I974 meeting as written. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BOARD OF APP�ALS SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: `FEBRUARY 28, 1974 MOTIDN by Drigans, seconded by Lindblad, that the PZanning Commissio� receive the Boar.d• of Appea.Zs Subcommittee minutes of Februar� 28, 1974. Upon a voice vote, a1I voting aye, the motion carried un�nimously. • R�CEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMTSSION MINUTES: MARCH 4, 1974 MOTION by Blair, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Comm.ission receive the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of March 4, 1974. Upon a voice vote, aI1 votiny aye, the motion carried unanirr�ous.Zy. R�C�IVE BOARD OF APP�AL5'SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: MARCH 13, 1974 MOTIDN b� Driqans, seconded by B1air, that fhe PZannzng Commission � xe�eive the. Board of Appeals Subcommittee minutes of March 13, .Z974. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. �.. ' ' 1: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL. USE PERMIT, SP #74-02, DAVID COPPERNOLL: Per Fridley City Code, Section 205.051, 2, A, to construct a second accessory building, a metal shed to be used for starage on the Easi� 83 feet. of the West 334.5 feet of Outlot A, Dennis Addition, an� the taest Half of thE East 166 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No l0, the same being 1328 6Gth Avenue N.E. • � � .� ' Mr. I�avid Coppernoll was present. ' MOTION by Drigans, s�econded by N�xrz�is, that the Planning Commissi�on waive �he reading of the Public Hearing notice on the request for a special use pe�mit, SP N79-02, by David Coppe'rno11. Upon a voice vote, a.tl voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ' �1 � .� � 2A Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 2 I� � Mr. Coppernoll said he has a small single car �garage and needs this 14 foot square metal shed for storage. He was purchasing this from Ward' s�. ' ' � , � Mr. Blair asked the height of the shed. Mr._Coppernoll said it was a littl� under eight feet. Mr. Blair asked if the door was large enough to accommodate a car. Mr. Coppernoll said the door was only 6 feet and it couldn't be used for this purpose. Mr. Harris said the plot plan showed that this building will be 6 feet from the side lot line, but how far will this be from ihe house. Mr. Coppernoll said it would b� 8 feet. Mr. Harris thought this was pretty close to the house. Mr. Clark said the code states there has to•be 5€eet between combustibles, measured from eave to eave, or it could be attached with a fire wall. Mr. Harris said he thought it was 15 feet. P�Ir. Clark said�that 15 feet applies to buildings of two different owners. Mr. Harris said this building is 196 square feet. He asked Mr. Coppernoll if this building would have a permanent floor.. Mr. �Coppernoll said it wi11 have a concrete floor. Mr. Harris asked if there would be any utilities in this building. Mr. Coppernoll said no, it would be used strictly for storage. Mr. Herbert Bacon, 6225 Central Avenue, said his property adjoins Mr. Coppernoll's property and he was here just to see what the request was about and he.had no objections. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by BZair, that the P.Zanning Commission � close the Public fiearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #74-02, by David CoppernoZl. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanirr�ously. � � � � � , , , � Mr. Harris asked Mr. Clark if the City staff was working on any code changes on these metal storage buildings. Mr. Clark said they have been working on the sign ordinance and the tree ordinance and haven!t finished gathering the data from other communities. The data they do have, it seemed like the requirement for a special use permit caas between 200_to 300 square feet. Some cities don't require. a permit at all for these sheds. _ ., • MOTION by Harris, seconded by B1air, that the Planning Commission recammend to Council approval of the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #74--02, by David Coppernoil, per Fridley City Code, 5ection 205.051, 2,: A, to construct a second accessory buildinq, a metal shed to be used for storage, on the East 83 f.eet ot the West 334.5•feet of Outlot A, Dennis Addition, and the West Ha1f of the East 166 feet of the West 467.5 feet of Lot 6, Revised Auditor's Subdivisian No. 10, the same beinq 1328 66th Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: • (1) This building be attached to a permanent foundation. (2) The use of this.building be limited to storage. (3) This building is not to be used for any commercia2 enterprise. UPON a voice vote, a11 voLing aye, the motion carried unanimously. I � � . Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 �Page 3 I' 2. PUBLIC HEARING: TREE ORDINANCE (PETITION #4-1974) �. Chairman Fitzpatrick said there was no official Public Hearing ' notice published.on this hearing, but it was publicized in the paper, as we requested at our last meeting. Mr. Fitzpatrick said that a petition for this ordinance was presented to the City Council with some 4,000 signatures. The Council has 64 days to react to the petition, at which time they will have the choice of adopting the ordinance as presented or prepare to have it go on a referendum ballot. They can also ask for chang�s in this ordinance, and if four of the five members of the sponsoring committee agree to these changes, the Council can adopt the amended ordinance. If the sponsoring conunittee doesn't agree to the changes made by the Cc7uncil, it will still have to go to a referendum ballot. The Council passed this p�titioned ordinance on to the Planning Commission for � our recommendation. At that point the Commission decided to hold a Public Hearing to get input in preparation to making a recommendation to the City Council. Mr.. Fitzpatrick said he would like to read the petitioned ordinance into the minutes. He said this was an ordinance prohibiting the destruction of trees on City owned public land in the City of Fridley except under specified conditions, and states: The City of Fridley Does Ordain as follows: Section 1. No person or corporation, public or private, ineluding but not limited to the City of Fridley, its officers, employees or agents, sha].l order or cause the injury or destruction of any living tree on the City owned land except uncier the following conditians: (a) For control of verified cases of Oak Wilt or Dutch Elm disease as provided in Cn. 28 of the Fridley City Code. (b) For purposes of woodland management, the removal of up to 3 tr_ees per acre per year may be perinitted, but only after a management plan justifying such removals has been approved by the Fridley Parks & Recreation Subcommittee,-the Fridley Planning Commission and the Fridley City Council. No tree r.emoval shall be allowed under the provision of this Paragraph which is not defined in the Plan. , (c) For purposes of necessary public:utility construction, but only after the preparation of a detailed plan and approval by the authorities named in Paragraph "b" abov No,such plan shall be�•approved which does not provide for reforestation and restoration of the Tand to its original condition. Section 2. Trees measuring less than 3 inches in diameter at �a point � 4 ft. above ground are exempt from the provisions of this � ordinance. , : � ■ - � • � 2C ■ Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 4 . � ' I� ' Section 3. Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prevent the routine trimming of trees in street right of way. Section 4. Any person who violates this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The injury or destruction of each protected tree shall be a separate violation. Chairman Fitzpatrick said this is the ordinance that has been referred to us for our recommendation. Any changes the Planning Commission or Council might wish to make are limited to keeping the. intent of the ordinance. If the sponsoring committee doesn't agree witli any proposed changes, it will still have to go to a referendum vote as required in our City Charter. �-�- . Nir. Fitzpatrick said he had received two letters that should be in the minutes. iie would read them and then the Planning Commission could receive them. ; /Mr. Fitzpatrick said the first letter was from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and was written to Jerrold Boardman, Planning Assistant of the City of Friciley. �"Re:—Proposed City of Fridley Tree Preservation and Management Ordinance. In the brief time provided, the ' has reviewed the proposed ordinance trees on city owned public land in � ' � , , ' ' , Department of Natural Resources prohibiting the destruction of the City of Fridley. The intent of the ordinance is to preserve the existing trees. Therefore, it is not for the purpose of woodland management but rather for the purpose of woodland preserva�ion. No management plan to provide for a viable healthy stand of trees could be predicated upon the rerioval of only three trees per acre per year. Therefore, we belive that the wording of paragraph B should read: "for the purpose of.woodland preservation the removal", and so forth. We are not certain as to the reason for exempting trees measuring less than three inches in diameter at a point four feet above the ground from the provisions of this ordinance. We would assume that the intent would be to create a park-like situation with only larger trees preserved, however, in areas where larger trees do not exist it would appear that it would be desirable to retain smaller trees with the spacing desired by the city to create a park-like affect. Due to the short noticet, we regret that we were unable to arrange for a Department of Natural Resources representative to attend your meeting, but we trust that this assessment of the proposed ordinance will be usefull to you. Sincerely, C.B. Buckman, Deputy Commissioner." MOTION by B1air, seconded by Drigans, that the P.Zanning Commission xeceive the Ietter from the Department of Natural Resources, dated March 19, 1974. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. . 0 Plannin Commission ME:eting - March 20, 1974 � Page 5 Chairman Fitzpatrick than read into the minutes the letter from Northern States Power Company dated March 20, 1974, and addressed to the Fridley Planning Commission. "Re: City of Fridley Ordinance We want to be certain restrictions are not placed on us that would prevent us from providing good reliable electric service. Changes listed below would be recommended: � Section 1 Paragraph C--- Omit last sentence --- no such plan shall be approved which does not provide for reforestation and the restorati.on cf. the land. to its original condition. ;Section 111 Amend Section 3--- nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prevent the routine trimming of trees in street right- of-way or utility easement right-of way. � Your eonsiderution of these sugge5tions would be appreciated. • . � � Sincerely, John F. Ranck, Municipal Services Respresentative, North Division." MOTION by Harris, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission ' � recei.ve the letter from Northern States Power Company dated I�larch Z0, 1974.' Upon a voice vote, all voting a�e, the motion carried unanimously. � .' � ' C ' ' • � ' Chairman Fitzpatrick said that if it was possihle he would like the people who have positive �`eelings about'this ordinance to alternate with people who have negative feelings about the ordinance, in coming to the microprione. Mr. Bill Nee, 219 Logan Parkway, said that concerning the Northern States Power Company letter, he would like to get a little feed-back. In Section lll, where they propose to ask for utility easement right- of-way he wondered if that's necessary to the extent it's on public land and is permitted,' and to the extent it's �i�t on public land, it's not regulated. Mr. Nee asked if this was the way the Planning Commission read the ordinance. �. • Chairman Pitzpatrick said to the extent it's on priva�e land, it isn't regulated,�but on public land, it is. Mr. Nee said he understood. He said he saw the point of the comment on Paragraph C. It is mainly the concern of trees growing up and interfering with overhead utilities, If it �ead, "except where they interfere with overhead utilities", could that be worked out rath�r than a complete deletion of the sentence. We should find some �way to provide language, without any deletion. Mr. John Ranck, Nort�hern States Power Company, said that the ordinance attempting to regulate the City's removal of trees has �nothing to do �vith our. every day business. In that light, we are not opposed to this ordinance. We want to make sure that there aren't � , , � ' � � ' ' , 2E � Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 6 things in this ordinance that prohibits us from providing services which the City of Fridley requires from us. Usually when we remove a tree, it is to remove a danger. If a tree grows up into high voltage line, the.tree is either going to be killed or it can be energized and cause a hazard to someone walking by. It can cause� momentary outages, which while this doesn't cause too much of a problem in a residential area, it can cause big problems for a commer_cial enterprise. They may have a con�puter or tape driven equipment. Momentary outages can caus� machines to lose control. We've had problems with this before. Also, in the case of high winds . where trees have been blown over into our lines and in order to get these lines back in order, sometimes we have to remove some trees to get into an area with our heavy equipment, to repair the lines. 4Ve ceouldn't have time during an emergency to come to me�etings to get . permission to remove these trees. �^7e are a service company and it is our job to repair electric lines as soon as possible. This ordinance is not aimed at us , and we'd really like to be exempt from the whole ordinance. '� Chairman Fitzpatrick said all of Paragraph C is aimed at the public utilities. � _ Mr. Ranck said that in the past, where they have had to remove trees to put in an underground system, they have put the trees back and re��laeed the sod. He said the company thought problems coulci come fram this ordinance that they couldn't anticipate at the present time . � � Mr. Drigans said you stated that North�rn States Power Company � requ�sts to be relieved of the whole ordinance. Is it the position of N.S.P. that this is not a good ordinance? i i I� �� ' ' �I � � Mr. Ranck said they ti�ere fully cognizant of the reasans for this ordinance and we don't feel it was written with Northern States Power Company in mind. Because tree trimming is important to us and also the keeping of tree� we aren't against a tree ordinance. We have a large tree management program on the St. Croix. We just don't want to get embroiled in something that doesn`t pertain to us . In case of a bad storm, we wauld not want to end up in Court trying to perform our regular job. Under this ordinance, we can't do business in Fridley. as we have been, and we would like the two considerations men�ioned in our letter to be given consideration. We would like to be zelieved of the entire ordinance. Mrs. Helen Treuenfels, 5248 Horizon Drive, said she was one of the people who circulated the petit�ion. She said that Mr. Ranck stated that he was sure this ordinance had nothing to do with Northern States Power Company and that we all know why this ordinance was written which is true. Some of the comments that were made by the people I approached might be rel�vant here. A number of people commented that they were signing thispetition, not just for North Park, but also because of what happened in Locke Park. They felt the N.S.P. wires that went across Locke Park despoiled the City. They were interested � in North Park, but they felt the util�it� companies should have to pay attention to w�iat we need.in Fridley too. They don't want this ordinanc 1 ' ' � ' ' , � 2F Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 7 written for the benefit of Northern States Power Company. Mr. Clark sa�d.as he reads the ordinance, it does pertain to public utili�ies; and he didn't know if it pertains to street con- � struction, but let's say it does. Then Paragraph C, that Northern 5tates Power Company is concerned about, would make it practically impossible to build a street where there was forest or trees. If you had to put the trees back after you put in the street, it would be impossible to use the street. ��lhile he thought there should be a plan submitted to_the different bodies mentioned in Paragraph B,� the point of_ restoration shauld be qone into a little more thorough�y. It should be determined what restoration really is necessary. Would grading, soding and the planting of boulevard trees be permitted, or d��s it meaii that t-rees have to be planted back from where they were ariginaJ_ly removed. Mr. Fitzpatrick said he would think that would be part of the plan at the time it was submitted. Mr. Clark said the ordinance does say restor_ation of the land back to its original condition. He�thought this part of the ord'inance should be mod�fied somewhat. Mr. Clark said there may be other instances where a private owner ' may want to remove a boulevard tree. The tree in the boulevard could be a short lived tree and as the other trees in his yard matured, it might b� good tree management to remove the boulevard tree. If there ' were more than three of these in the street right-of way, it would would prohibit the removal of this tree. Mr. Clark thought there should b� some provision for that person to get a permit to remove it. ' j � � I�� , ' , � Mr. Fitzpatrick asked what the policy was now. Mr. Clark said �here was no permit required. Peo�le should call in if they want to remove a tree and it would be inspected. If it should be removed they would be given permission to do so. � Mr. Harris asYed if �e had an ordinance covering this. Mr. Clark said he couldn't state vahere it was covered, but no one would be allowed to dig a big hole in street right of way to remove a tree without permission. Mr. Harris said that he knew that in Minneapolis, the only one who could remove a boulevard tree was the Park Board. Mr. Clark sai.d the City probably does need a.good tree management ordinance, but it should be something the City could live with. Mr. C.. M. Kam, 120 Talmadge Way N.E., said that in reference to the strees in the street right-of way, he thought..that through t�e tax process of the City, that the property owner was responsible for the grass up to the curb. F'or example, and this is relating to voting, if someone puts a poster on that land between the road and your property ..which you are taxable for, even if you relate �ourself to maintaning that boulevard and keeping it presentable, that you have the right to leave it there, or give the right to have a sign put there without any one else complaining. So I don't believe the City has anything to do with, at the present time, if you have a tree that is detrimental to your area, that you haven't got the right to remove it. This has nothing �o do with the ordinance tonight. This is a separate issue. � ' ' ' � ' � , ' � ' � � � � ' � ' 2G Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 8 Mr. Kam said he thought that if it was looked up, the taxpayer is responsible for everything up to the roadway. � Mr. Clark said that it is true tha� the City doesn't go out and cut the grass on the boulevard. The private owner is responsible�for main�aining the boulevard in front of his own house. I haven't searclied the ordinancc�hat far to determine haw it would affect the boulevards. If some neighbor called in and complained about another neighbor cutting down a boulevard tree, we wo•uld try to da.scourage tha� from happening. In some cases, the boulevard trees have been plan�ted by the City. F'or about two or three years, there was an intensive tree pragram going on. Mr. Blair asked if any member of the sponsoring committee was presen-� in the audience because he was concerned how this ordinance vrould affect the parks and recreation program of the City of Fridley. He said that Section l, Paragraph B, that only allows 3 trees per acre to be removed would stop the park development program in Fridley. He said they have eight parks they were ready to develo� and there was no way they could be developed under this.ordinance. Mr. Blair said he was not opposed i:.o having a tree ordinance,.but this ordinance �-�as too restrictive in its present form. Mr. Fitzpatrick said he didn't see any members of the sponsoring committee in the audience. Mr. Harry Crowder, 146 63rd Way N.E., said as he interprets this ordinance, it would pertain to any tree on anyone's boulevard. If I read this right, I can't do injury to that tree. If the kids climb on it and break a branch, I won't be able to trim that tree until I get permission from the Parks & Recreation Commission, the Planning Commission and the City Council. Mr. Fitzpatrick said it would be his interpretation that you were not injuring that tree by reasonable tree trimming. Mr. Nee said he'd like to underscore that the process we're in is sort af an exorabl� process. At this point, it behooves us to make those adjustments that should be made, bearing in mind that they should be in line with the purposes of this ordinance. For instance, Darrel Clark brought�up the question o� streets. Alr. Nee said he could see what he meant and if there is a question on whether you could legally build a street, that probably should be clarified. T don't think it's inconsistant with the intent of the ordinance. The purpose of this hearing is to find some way to work it out and I think this pertains to N.S.P. also. If you can find some way to work it out that four out of the five sponsoring committee mer,bers would accept it as to �vhether or not there should be some type of waiver procedure. As far as the boulevard trees, this ordinance would be more of a protection than a hindrance, because more often the municipality decides they want to widen a roadway and goes through and cuts all the trees down in the boulevard. Maybe there should be a Section �3,A, or somet,hing that provides for emergencies. He said there should be a consiructiv� ap�roach to this and recognize�that something like this will go before`the electorate. We should try to work out the wrinkles ' � , . � � � ' ' , ' � ' , , , I � , 2H Planninq Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 9 in the ordinance so people can live with it. Mr. Lindblad said that in addition to Mr. Blair's statem�nt, he would like to have thought given to a proposal the Plar..��Lng Commission had aiscussed before and that was a tree nursery for Fridley. Under this ordinance, the City wouldn't be able to move these trees for replanting in other areas. � Mr. Harris said as long as this has been brought up, he would like to see a City nursery and reforestration program tacked an ta this ordinance. Mr. Paul Brown said they have picked out one or two sites where the Parks Department plans to have a nursery but it is up to ou.r departent to submit this for the 1975 budget. Mr. Harris asked if it would help to tack a section onto this ordinance. Would it help to get �his r.ursery set up instead of just having the idea. NIr. Brown said this would have to be set up as a yearly program, stipulating a certain amount of money that could be spend on the program. Chairman Fitzpatrick said the references made here are to a proposal that has been made for the last �ew years, by the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Planning Commmission and the general public, that the City get into a nursery program so they would have trees available to plant around the City. Mr. Kam said that he was in favor of horticulture, but as to adding this as an addendum on this ordinance, he thought it would have a tendency to destroy this ordinance. This would in affect be raising our tax�s, and hP didn't believe it should be added. Mr. Harris said he didn't think we were talking about that much money. He said he wanted to call it to the attention of the Councilmen present that the City seemed.to be able to come up with the money for other things. M�. Brown said the program set up at the time of the.tornado was a three year program and it cost between $4600 to $5,000. . Mr. Har�is said he�didn't think it was the Planning Commission's ' intent to have that kind of program. That program was for much larger trees. We're talking about a seedling pr�gram, a�$500 program. ' Chairman Fitzpatrick said Mr. Kam's point that this could give opposition to this ordinance that it might not otherwise have, has to be considered. ; • � � , , ' Mr. Fitzpatrick said he would like to state again, that the Council has the option of adopting this ordinance as presented, or recommending changes that are agreeable to four of the five members of the sponsor- �.ng co.mmittee or else it goes to a referendum vote. He said we have to bear in mind that the sponsoring committee isn't going to agree with any changes that depart from the spirit of the ordinance.� This . petition was signed by 4,000 people and they are not going to take lightly tYie decision to agree to any changes. � ' � ' ' , , � LJ , . ' 0 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 10 ' �� Mrs. Barbara Hughes, 548 Rice Creek Terrace, said the Council can adopt an amend�d ordinance and if this is not satisfactory to the committee, it will still go to a referendum. Mr. Drigans asked the representativefrom Northern States Power Company if he was aware of the proposed tree ordinance for Edina, Minnesota. Mr. Drigans said he thought this ordinance should be read to�tb� people, so they could be aware of what another community was in the process of doing as to a tree ordinance. Mr. Clark said that this Edina ordinance pertains to private � property and not to public property. It excludes the City, so as a tree ordinance it is quite difterent from the proposed ordinance for Fridley. . Mr. Drigans read the proposed tree ordinance for Ec3ina. ORDItiAt:CF ;:0. 8?.3 �1A OF�DI:i:1.�CL•' REGUI..t1'.CI:�G T1�E R;�i0V:1L OP �F.F.L•'S 1•;I'i�ll�' Tii;: CITY Ati� PRO�'IDI\G A PE:'� �L'TY - T�iE CITY COI;:;CII. OF T1iE: C1TY OI' EllI.�_1, 2•II:�.YESOT�1, OF.D�T�S: Preliminary Draft (all new) , Seci.iot� 1. . PUi'.�'�SL ��ll T�TE::T. The Cit}� Council hercby finds , that it is ne.cessary to r::ai.�tain 3i1CI protect thc e:�isti� g urban forest in � order to preserve �ir.dbr_c�ak pratecCi.on, abate soa�l erosion and ent�ance the ' . natural beauty of the Git}• and ac:opts this ordinance ir. Cne inte��st oz the hcal.t:tl,. safety azG geiieral welfare of the residents of tne City. ., � ' � ' Sec. 2. T�ZEE DI?FI;;ED. Foz the purpose of this ordin4nce, TF.EE siiatl mean a�,00dy pere�nizl plant, us��ally ��ith one r.;air. stem or trunl: and T.13Ttj�-br�nct�ed, �•.h�ch has a dia�neter o£ greate.r Liiaz si:� (6) inches �ahen measured at a point four (�r) f'ee� above the oround le�, el . • . . Sec. 3. fiL•'�SOt'�\L OF TR�;FS; P:-:.°.�fIT R?�OUI?:rD. �:ithovt 2 perr.tit there- � --- _TL for; it shall be un].awful for any per.so�2, iir�:� or. corporati.on to remove or _ cut doti�n or autliorize ttie cutting doc.� or destruction o* ��Iiy tree gro:,in� within the City. �" � � L t ', ' . ' Sec. 4. PEF:•fIT ?�OK P.E�fO�,?��.L 0:' 1RLES; PR.00L'Di:^-.E. (a) ��licati.on. Ar�y per.son, firm or co�por: tion desirin�- to cu� clo�•:n or remove anS� Cree gro�ain� within the City shall file an appli.cation therefor.c�ith tne City Clerk on the iorcn provided b} hi�i for such purpose. Such applicaCion sh��:ll be accompanied by a fea of 'ren Uollars ($10.00). Eacti �pplication sh�:ll include a survey sho�ain�.the location of the tree er trees concerned and shall further include a state�ent of the rea�on for the requesC. Prior to sub:�itting suo� aPpl.iczCior., the applicant shali nark each txee to be cut do�tin or. rer::ove�l ��:iCh a red tag. ' ' , ' ' , ' ' . ' . . ��. • Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 11 � (b) .Inspecti.on. Upon receipt of suc!���pplication, th� Ci_t,y Cleri: sh311 forcaard tt�e annlic�t�_on to the City Uirector o£ 1'arks �•�ho shall pr.o:^�tl-y ins?ect such �� • tr.ee or trees aiid indicate on said appl�.cation: (1} 'The type of tree or trees and their a�proximate . h��i�}its; ' ' (?.) T'he tiealLti or conditic.^. o� the tree or trees; ' �3� i'.IlnChc:r or� r.c� 121 il?S CJ?:;i0:1 SIIC[1 reu�0�'c1� 1S justified �y rcason oi: . (i) Good forestry pr�:t?ce; or - s 0 � '' -- i' ' � (ii) Thc poor h��lt:� or ��:�; �ro�s ccnditio�i of Ctie Lr�e er tr•��s; or (iia) Coi:structio:� or o;.';�� i-:;�_o•�e��ents bein� r.:ade to tt�e vr.».�r �:: , Thc birector cf Par'-.s sh,�l? �:�r?uoc� for;•:ard Lhe �l��lication tc L-he Plaan�_:; �.��rC�ent. � (c) ��p:�,-oL-� �. �r 1)��;;;�� . i:�e Ci.�;• ?±an, �r S112ZI rerie�: the apj�la.cat _o:� to�etn�r �:-�t�: �:�� =��o-rt oi t�e Direc�or of �'acks a:�d si:��ll ��_�rov� o� �e�•� th� 2�plicati;.�:� based u�o:i the s�3�:dar� s s: �=or�h in Sectiau !F. (,�) (3) ab�ve tc_�ther ��ith Ci;.. ?; __ cs� ar,-� zr:Ce:ct or ti�=s or�i- nunce as herein set :.cr.th �.;� ���c`�en 1. Ir tl;e a?pl.i- . catiori is den;eri b�� t�'ne Ci��: _'��-:� er, c:�T].i.t2I1 notice of sucti 2Gtio;; specii,;in'_; r"I!� _�LE �.: _reor, ta�et<<zr �i3ti1 t(l� YE:aSOi1S t:il°r:'_?OT ....___. �JE3 i:.�t.i.ICCt t0 thE'. 2��)11.— C'd:2t 8t t.}lf: �CiC11Cj:;S S:10'.�i? ::? S::C.: 2Dh�1C8t7.0i1. If 1i��)'L"(:Vi:Cj � t,7G- C:�C�' �}: i.il:'� :. ,_l.Z �$Si;�? the DCYi:1� �O thc� applican;. �C�� �'2i"r;l.t `O�?—T1 ^?1.r,;� r2J� E� '•?;:i : �:�il. r1i1)• p�rmit grc�.Ri�'C! he:-cut�d�:r is i:c�i-���.�:;,,_: ��� _: :; s'r.a�l e:.pire si:. (') ''� ' o mon�:ns fro:n date of issu«:^ce. � ' (e) Rc�strict:ecl to Snecz`ic Pro>>c�, Zn t�:e event a p�rnit fOY' =:rCC' i.G!.^.UV�I.� :.:� pic_:?tf'_ :... QI'C:G': t0 C'It�?JZ^ tCl° applic� �i� t:o car. rv � c�u*_ so-.� . r�J zct o� devele�:�ecit or imprc�<<e.:,cnL of tlze pro� e� �; , rsuc'-i pe_;�it sn�ll oc etfec- � �].�'C-' 0:��.y J_T2 CO:LIICCCIO?I ::1 �.. �.^.� aC,~.!!Fll 2CCCi.i�1'1S:1i:1L':1t. . .. oi ,«�� ���o���r. . , ., � Sr.c. S. �z��.r:,i::?`:G T:r�:.��'f� r=� t�.'�-��'��D. ' ...= __._ __: __ _�. � rior to c�lttin� doc;;t Oi iE:C?OVJ.11�; £iiljl t�'CC OT i:T��C:: i)U:'cUuilt �O u.^.c'.Y:1:_: ].�::1!�Cl i:Cr�UI�CIE:Y'� Ci1C apDlic:nL' sl�atl pro�ec;; 311 o;.h::r t:ees �:: :'.-�� v?ci: ity.o: C}1U5� to be re- [:OVCtCj t•:�11C}l : �:.' JC Cj.�~:A,•.�:� Cilll":.:1`� SUCiI 7�.^.C�SS' b�' 1:.5Cis�.!�Ciun O1: ST:O!J fencin� or CL[li:r suit; ;,lc CI1C!O: ur�. � � n ' ' � . . d�/t Planning Conunission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 12 ' ' ' � ;vn,: yI_S 7 �-.,�•• Sec. 5. __-=-_-------0 C�_..('?L. �•.:,_• �_^?_icar� ::;;o dce-.s hi::seli . f�:r�_eve:. c� a:� aly�, �:i ��:: c�z :�.a <:i_;'--cr��. , - - :uir�-�n4, clecis�ar� or ' � ' ' a�ter- +::lili i;10;1 :'..ciC D� C:li: •�.:��.� �l.ii::(iC'T �:i. �12C �._-._ :i��Ts:riU:l .:i i:C1�S 02'C.III.�.I1Cc� ::.�:j' F:��):ri:.l. CO C::�. %1��' i.O::I1C11 'iri C: C? C_......_ "'...::^i:T. • ': G •. � r� . , . , � � � �� ' t � •,. ' • ' (a) .'ri�e api�li.cailt, ��itlliil thirt-�� .(30) d�ys of � ny suc.i � sucli ord^r, requireiac:nt, decision or deterr:tlll�iL:lOil� shaZl fiJ.e a writ:ten appeal with the Ci.ty Clerk ' ; ettin� for.th [:tie action being appealed and the facts re1�1i:111;; tlicr��to, and tt�e ��ailiiig ��ddress ox applicant. (b) The City Council at its ncxt regul.�r r.:eetin� after r.ecei_pt: by the Cit}� Cler:: o£ such appc� 1 snall set a date for he� ri.n� thereon, �•�hicii si���ll be not l�ter than si_�t}• (6U) d�:,ys aLter the r^F etin�. � notice of the dat-e, Lime, place Lnd purpose oi the h�aring snall be puhlisl�ed in tlie ofii.cial necaspaper of tne City aC leasL �.en. (10) da5-s prior to ttie liearin�. After hearing the orzl or zariLten vzews of al� interestel persons, the Counc:iZ sI1a11 m�ke its decision a� the same or a speciLied future ne.et-ing thezeof. Sec. 7. A'�.E:�:D`ff;\TS TO AP�'L?C:1TI0\. The apolicant rna}• amenci his appla.caLian so as to reduce th.e nur:ber of trees to be re� oved at any tir.:e . prior to final deterr�i.i�<�:tion of an appeal by the City Council, and the City Council stiall consider and decide aizy appeal based upon t23e applicatien as amenc�ed . Sec. S. E}�F:,�SPTIU\S. The px'ovisions of this ordinance �hall not appl}t . to : . . (a) The-rer.iaval of trees by or at the direction of Lhe City of, Edina or any departr:;enC or . � adma.nistrative officia7. :.hereof; � . (b) `lIie removal of trees pursuant to Orc�inance No. 1035; . �: ; . (c) Ttie removal o£ trees pursuant to an Approved Pl.an undcr Orclinance \o. 817. Sec. 9. 2'E2�:'1LTIF,S. Violation of this ordinance shall be a mis- denieanor Puni�liab].e by a�:LI1C i�o� to c�:ceed $300,00 per tree illegally re- movcd ar lef t unprotected', or i�:�prisonr��ent f.or not- r�ore ihan nir.ety (90) days, or both, �3nd in �del�tion pr�yr�:enG of all,�casts of prosecution and ex- pei�ses involvecl in Ltie case. Violation hc°reof shall aaso be �rounds for xevocatiou or suspension of �ny pernit �ranteci £or the construction or re- tnodel.in� of builclin4s or for Lhe subcii.vision oi' l�ncl. Sec. 10. T}iis ordi.n�ince shall be in full Force .1T1CI effect fr.on� and upon its passa�e and pt�blic�ition. '. ' � � � , ,. . • . , Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 13 . v�� � Chairman Fitzpatrick said this ordinance is similar to the ordinance they have in Carmel, California, where you can't touch any tree, anytime, without a hearing. This type of ordinance is being � adopted many places. � � Mrs. Treuenfels said she thought this was wonderful. We can run � our Parks & Recxeation Depar.tmentfrom the $10 per tree we get from the Inspection Department. Mr. Brown said he noticed on the top of the Edina Ordinance that , it was a preliminary draft. Mr. Clark said this is a pending ordinance that hasn't been adopted yet. He said that Edina has a tree disease ordinance and a zaning ordinance covering the planting of trees in � the boulevard. iYZr. Brown said Fdina's ordinance No. 1035 is probably the�oiie.on diseased trees and ordinance No. 817 is on plans for development. ° J ' ' , , ' r J� � � ' ' ' ' Mr. Walt Starwalt, 1021 Hackmann Circle, said he wanted to speak as a citizen and to charge the Planning Commission with coming up with an ordinance that was beneficial and worthwhile to the City of. `Fridley, that will be acceptable to the five petitioners, and �aill also serve the purpose for which it came about, and tliis was quite a task. As far as the ordi_nance is concerned, they have mentioned Oak Wilt and Dutch Elm disease, and I think it should include other diseases if not mentioned specifically by name. It should include diseased that are detrimental to viable growt.h. You can't limit it just to two things. He continued, that on growth less than 3 inches in diameter, there are times ���hen no growth should be removed. In other words, when is a tree a tree. H� said you can buy some saplings for 5 cents apiece and hold 100 of thern in your hand. On Section 111, he believed this�.,. section shoulct be expanded to read that nothing in this ordinance shall be construE�d to prevent the routine trimming of trees in street right- of-way except that non-viable growth can be taken. This would be a tree that has been damaged in some way, and its future is uncertain. It wi11 never be a tree of beauty. Chairman Fitzpatrick�said that other diseases were considered in . writing the present ordinance the City has for diseased trees (Ordinance No. 481). One of the fears was that if the di.seases weren't mentioned specifically that trees with other diseases would be taken. Tree management people will tell you that outs�.de of these two diseases, • other diseases can be treated and the tree can continue to live and groca Some people go so far as to say the dead trees are where wildlife make their homes, but your point was very well taken, and it was considered at the time the other ordinance was written. � Mr. Willis Unke, 1422 Trollhagen Drive, said he thought the petition does address �he manner in which the Park Board can develop it's parks. He said the statement was made that you can't develop a ball diamond � without the removal of trees. He said there probably should be some provision made when the Park Department feels a ball diamond is more valuable than the trees.. He thouc�ht they need to determine how and to what purpose we have a park. There may be another area where �he ball diamond could be located without removing trees. - . . � . �� , Planning Commission Meeting - March 20,-1974 • Page 14 ��. Mr. Blair said the Park Department had just acquired a 3 acre ' site that has some trees on it, and as part of the development of the park, they want to include a ball diamond. The near�st ball diamond is 8 blocks a�vay. I don't know how we would justify telling ' pe.ople is this area that they can't have a ball diamond because we can't remove any trees. Mr. Unke waid tlzis is the crux of the whole discussion. D�aybe some provisian could be put in the ordinance for ' the development of ball diamonds. He couldsympathize with the Park Department's position. '• Chairman Fitzpatrick said we also have a 124 acre site that is heavily forested that would be difficult to develop a certain way, also. Mr. Harris asked Mr.•Nee how this ordinance would aff ect the Islarid of Peace -project. � Mr. Nee said that because the basic development of the Islands of Peace is completed and Gil Hodges Island is not City owned and Durnam Island is not City o��med so this is not entirely o�aned by the City. Part of it is owned by the County and this ordinanc� has nothing to do with County oumed prope�ty or County right-of-way. Nr. Nee said he would doubt if this ordinance would have any real effect on this project. If this ordinance had been in existance a year ago, there may have been some problems. Mr. Harris Mr. Nee what we are trying to get with this ordinance, wild.area preservation or woodland management. Mr. Nee said he didn't thin:k he should respond to this question because he didn't represent the sponsoring committee. He said he had some views of his own from circulating this petition. He said the public signed this petition for many reasons, a couple being that they didn't want North Park d�srupted for a golf course and a feeling that they simply did not like the �dea of bulldozers knocking down trees willy-nilly. He said re thouc�hi� thc: suc�ess of the petition is an expression of.a.,prc�found lack af contidence in Cit� government. They felt they eou3cln-'t trust tY�e City to protect �'the trees. As far as what you will have to deal with when you speak with the sponsoring committee, he couldn't say, but he had a feeling about it. Mr. Harris said in the,letter from Mr. Buchman of the Department of Natural Resourses he said something about creating a park-like affect. This would not be woodland management. Mr. Nee said this petition doesn't require anyone to cut down a 3�inch tree, it just doesn't protect them. He said he was not sure what distinction Mr. Buckman was making. . Mr. Harris said he had a list put out by the Park ' Fridley which lists the trees that do we11 in Fridley do not. You could class them as desirable trees and � not so desirable. He said that trees like Box Elders � do serve a purpose, but if they were choking out Oak might be well to remove that type of tree. ' I Department of and those that those that are�. and Cottonwoods or Green Ash, it � ' ' ' i ' � , � ' ' ' ' � I � ' ' � � �� Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 15 Mr. Nee said people have different opinions of what is a desirable treeo Chairman Fitzpatrick said he thought what the Department of Natural Resources letter was suggesting is a more-elaborate definition. In certain places, maybe certain trees should be protected below the 3 inch limit. They are suggesting more detail. Mr. Kam said that little trees grow to be big trees. A Red Pine seedling will grow 8 to 12 inches a year until it reaches about 6 feet and then it grows 12 to 18 inches a year. A White Pine will grow . 20 to 36 inches a year after it reaches a height of 8 feet. These are two nice trees for restoration. If you take out trees like this because they are under 3 inches, this would be �etrimental. to the purpose of the ordinance. He said he would like to call it to the attention of the representatives of Northern States Po�a�r Company tha.t it would take 22 years for a Norway Pine or Red Pine, from a seedling sta�re, to interfere with their lines. He said to have proper woodland management, you should only take the tre�s smaller than 3 inches that you know wouldn't come up good. He said he was referring to Mr. Harris's question on�whether this ordinance was for woodland management or a park-lik� affect. He said he could pZant.trees on his property so that you couldn't walk through, and he thought this was woodland management. Mr. Harris said he was referring to open space land. He said are we looking for a.wild area or a park-like affect. Mr. Kam said his understanding of this petition was that we were trying to keep certain areas of City property in a woodland stage. If we let trees come out of an apen area, t�vo years later its an open field and a prairie chicken couldn't live there. Then what do we do, we buy trees and start planting them. He said the City of Minneapolis is spending 17 million dollars to buy park land to create parks. 'I'�.�enty years ago they had all the park land they wanted and they destroyed it. I think we see �ar enough ahead, as citizens, and we dan't want that to happen here. Mr. Kamfasked Chairman Fitzpatrick if he understood it correctly that if the Council adopted an ordinance that was satis- factary to i�he sponsoring committee, this would not go to a referendum vote. Chairman Fitzpatrick s�aid if the Council adopted an ordiance that was satisfactory to the sponsoring commit�ee, there would be no reason for a ref�rendum. Mr. Harris said lets talk about.the 125 acres, He said he was up there the other day and saw a lot of wild life potential. If we move in there and make it a park-like affect, it will destroy this area for a wild life habitat. If we leave it as it is, it may be goad for the wild life, but.it will be inaccessible to people. Mr. �Narris. said if its not spelled out in the ordinance what . ttie purpose of the ordinance is, then we don't know if they want a park-like affect or woodland management. � - - . I, � Planning Commission Meeting - March 20,'1974 ' Page 16 � � ,� �I , ' C , ' �� Mr. Kam said the Council can pass any ordinance it wants to. They can change this ordinance, but within 10 days of the adoption of the ordinance, the sponsoring committee has tv agzee to the ordinance or it goes to a referendum. ' ��.� Mr. Clark said the sponsoring committee has a certain number of days to appeal. If they haven't come to an agreement within 10 days, the ordinance will go to a referendum vote. Chairman Fitzpatrick said the Council. can pass any ordinance it w�ntsto. How will the sponsoring committee know which ordin��.nce they might want to appeal? Mr. Clark said this would be an ordinance on trees. I�Irs.Treuenfeissaid she didn`t think.the sponsoring committee would agree to an ordinance drawn up by the City. Mr. Drigans said that Mr. Nee stated that people signed the petition for many reasons. Is i� possibl.e for the City to come up with a proposed tree oYdinance that could be put an the ballot also. Mrs. Txeuenf�ls said there ' amd botn pass. The one that Council would have to adopt. ' ' .' � � � � � ' � could be two ordinances on the ballot got the most votes would be the one the Mr. Starwalt said he knew the signers of the petition signed it for many reasons. He said he would have to disagree with Mr. Nee that one of �he reasons was because peoPle had a dim view of City government.- He though people had a dim view of certain Council action a� a particular time, and I think a 1ot of peaple signed this petition because they wanted to vote on the use of North Park. He said he believed most of the signer_s did not read the ordinance, they were just for mother, God, Country and trees. Mr. Nee said he would moderate his statement on a profound lack of confidence and take out profound. . Chairman Fitzpatrick said anyone who is passing a pefition should ask the person to read the petition before they ask to have it signed. Mr. Starcaalt said the contact he has had with people who were interested in this petition said that there was a:careful effort on the part of the people circulating this petition to make sure that the person signing was a registered voter, but at a certain point in time, "this effort was slacked off. Mrs. Treuenfelssaid this was because th�xe is a change in voter registration. People can register the day of the el.ection now, so anyone who signed this petition could be registered to vote before this petition camE to a vate. _ Mr. Starwalt said he knew the people were given the opportunity to read the petition, but a lot of them did not do so. He asked where are all the pQOple who were so interested in this petition. He was sure a large crowd was expected for this meeting and it isn't here. This is a sample of what the City Council contends with�also. ' , . . . ' � LJ � ' � , � ' i ' � �J ' �'7 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 �Page 17 Chairman Fitzpatrick said this does point up one of the weaknesses of th� petitioning system� but we can't�assume that the majority of people signed the petition without reading it. Mr. Starwalt said he was basing his assumption on the contacts he had made and the people who contacted him. � Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced Brother Sullivan who was representing the Environmen-�a1 Quality Commission at this meeting. - Brother Sullivan said he was asking far some clarification. If this or_dinance goes to a re£erendum vote, wi11 the entire petition be put on the ballot? Mr. Fitzpatrick said that it would. Brother Sullivan said he wondered how many people will read it through before they vote on it. He said.he was one of the circulators of the petition also, and he made sure that everyone read the petition before th��.� signed it, and they did�ask questi.ons also. As far as the EnvirQnmental Quality Commission, at their meeting of D�arch i_2, 1974, they accepted this ordinance as it was written. As the Commission was established by the City to watch the environment of the City, we believed this was needed by Fridley. Mr. Warren Johnson, Northern States Power Company, said he �aould like to respond to the gentleman who talked about trees growing in the right-of-way under transmission lines. He said it is true that t�ecs- can grow under these lines, bu�. in an emergency situation where they would have to come in with heavy equipment, these trees would make it very difficult to do a proper job. Mr. Harris said that if this was the case, how come you allowed a building to be constructed under your transmission lines. Mr. Johnson said that happens in isolated cases, and there must be adequate clearance and the building can't be built any higher. Buildings can't grow. Mr. Harris said they can catch on fire. Mr. Johnson said this was true. Mr. Harris said the case in point was a furniture store that was built after the transmission lines were in. . ' • Mr. Nee said he thought Northern States Power Compan� should put into their recommendation more specifically where this ordinance could be a problem. Mr. Nee said that in Locke Park, they were not on public land. They were on N.S.S.S.D, right-of-way.He asked if the repr_esentatives of N.S.P._could.give a specific area where they might have problems with this ordinance, instead of gen�eralities. Mr. Ranck said they might have to take out some trees on the boulevard on Mississippi.. ' Mr. Nee said that what he was getting at was that in the new developments, �.hey were going to underground utilities. iie said he had been sitting there thinking about where this could be a problem ' -�for utility companies and trying to determine where they would be developing on public land. , Mr. Ranck said position where, if . to call a meeting � they just didn't want to get themselves into a there was a storm, they would have to get someone before they could restore electr.ical service. We ' � '�I � � ' � � � ' � � � �� C � � � ' � A Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Pa e 18 have tree management programs ourselves. We try to make our sub- stations blend in the best we can. We have to have electrical enerqy. Mr. Nee said if this was a zeal problem, we'd have to amend the proposed ordinance, but I can't see any real problem. Mr. Ranck said if we take out a tree, there is a safety reaspn., and we don't want to put it back. He said that after the tornado, N.S.P. had to take out many trees on public right-of-way to get service res�ored. He said it wasn't �heir job to take out the trees at that time, but the City had all they could handle. He said tha�t� when it was possible to replace a tree, they alEaays replaced it with one of equal value. ..Mrs. Hughes.said she would be very concerned that we grant these emer_gency powers to N.S.P.,.but she wouldn`t want them to cut a half mile caide path though a park. There may be times when they will have to go in to make a major correction. T_ am not against them having emergency powers, but I am not in favor of giving them wholesale pawer in the City. Mr. Ranck said the letter f_rom N.S.P. asked for some minor changes in the ordinance and they were not asking for wholesale power. Chairman Fitzpatrick said the needs of the utility companies would be considered in the recorunendation of the Planning Commission. Mr. Neil Christensen, 608 63rd Avenue N.E., said that concerning 5ection l, 1�, for control of verified cases of Oak v�ilt and Duuch Elm disease, that there are a variety of other diseases that trees can have, but these. are the two that are the most difficult �o control. Other tree diseases can be controlled. Also, on the construction of baseball diamonds and other things on public property, he personally thought we had quite a iew baseball diamonds at the present time. P�ir. Brown has donc an eycellent job on this. He said he didn't think they would need a baseball diamond at North Park. In some park� we could use more trees sa this could b� a benefit from the propo5ed ordinance. Mr. Christensen said that as far as cottonwood. trees and cutting them down to e�iminate the cotton problem, this would mix up the natural succession of the forest in the North Park area. They should leave the trees alone. Let them ].ive and_die normally. He �hought that there should be minor changes made in the proposed ordinanc� and that should be submitted to the Council, rather than writing a new ordinance. Chairman Fitzpatri.ck said they had expected a larger crowd at this hearing. He said some of the supporters of this ordinance had contacted him after the Public Hearing date had been set, and took the position that we would want to hear more from people who did not support this ordinance. Mr. Fitzpatrick said he didn't know if he agreed with tlii5, but this could explain why we don't have a crowd. Mrs. Treu�nfels said this has been well publicized. The people. knew there were sufficient siqnatures so the Councf.l will have�to do something about this ordinance, whether they want to or not. We don't have tb plead gur case any longer. � � � L� � . �+ � . Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 19 • Brother Sullivan said we could also assume that some of the ' people who �signed the original petition, after attending this meeting or reading the minutes of the meeting, might change their mind on this ordinance and vote against it. _ Mrs. Treuenfels said this is fine. The people have demanded the right to vote on this issue and they can vote anyway they want to. Chairman Fitzpatrick said we are having this hearing so we can return the proposed ordinance back to the Council. with our recommendatio Mr. I�Tee said that just for his own information, he wondered if we � could go through the ordinance briefly and define where the problem areas might be. He said that as a responsible membe�r of the Council, I think we need to identify the areas that won't work �nd we need to � : judicate them. We have the questions of N.S.P., the question if parks can be developed, the question of if roads can be built. 1 Chairman Fitzpatrick said there should be an avenue oi' appeal ....in this ordinance. It is pretty absolute. Maybe there isn't any way . we�can provide for an appeal without leaving loopholes we don't want. ii � Mr. Harris asked who was going to administer this ordinance. Mr. Fitzpatrick said the ordinance does not say, but it is implied that someone would admini5ter it. Mr. Harris said would it be the Engineering Department, a naturalist � forestry manager or what. Mr. Clark said the�e would not have to an administrator for the ordinance, it would �ust have to be enforced. � Mr. Harris said i�ahat would the City do if it wanted to extend Main Street, for instance. �aould the Engineering Department prepare the plan. Mr. Clark said yes, and then the plan would go through the channels as stated in the ordinance. Mr. Harris said then the � Council would have the final say on any proposed plan. r2r. Clark said •this was correct. 1�. � Mr. Harris asked who was going to administer the taking of three trees an acre. Mr. Fitzpatrick said we ha,ve some of these functions assigned to the Park Department at the pre'sent time. He asked Paul ' Brown if he thought this ordinance seemed to call for personnelwe don't a.lready have. He said he knew Paul has acted as the City for�ster � � : � , Mr. Brown said that in Section l, B, where it states there can be removal of 3 trees per acre per year, and that this has to be approved by the Parks & Recreation Subcommittee, the Fridley Pl.anning Commission and the Fridley City Council, and the City administration is under the command of all�three of these bodies. The conclusion �ou have to come to will depend upon the equipment we have. At this i:ime the City of Fridley.has very little equipment for the removal of trees. Based on our ordinance concerning Dutch Elm and Oak Wi1�L, any removal of trees under this ordinance has to be done by the property owner at his o�n expense. If he doesn't do it, then the City moves in and does it. At this time, the City always refers it to a professional � 1 ' � • • � � � Planning Commission Meeting - March 20,_ 1974 . Page 20 tree service and have them remove the tree. Mr. Clark said that on any public land where the City might want to put up a public building, if it was a wooded area, they would no� be able to construct this buia_ding if more than thre� trees an. acre l�ad to be removed. We wouldn't have been able to build City Hall, the Fire Station or move the 11 Frame to a park, under this ordinance. Mr. Bro�an said we may have to build a few more pump stations and filtration plants at some time also. �: Mr. Brown said he would like to make comment on N.S.P.'s proposal in that the City also has a problem of tree trimming and tree maiiztenance in the par}�s, so Section 3 c�ould also have to allow the Park Departmerii�to do some routine trimming of trees within a park. � This is dor_e by the utility compani�s, the Public Works Department anc:i :tYie Par}c Departn,en�. The petitioned ordinanee only allows for tree trimming on street right-of-way. L� l_� � � .� b90TION by B1air, seconded by close the Pub.Zic Hearing on the t a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the Lindblad, that the Planning Com.mission ree ordinance (Petition 4-Z974). Upon motion carried unanimously. Mr. Clark said the Couricil has to adopt an ordinance by May 6th. To give the Council time to consider the Planning Commission's recom- mendation, they should have this recommendation by their first or secand meeting of April. He said the Planning Commission should give themselves April 3rd as a deadline for this recommendation. Mr. Blair said he would want the Council made aware of the impact of this ordinance on the Park Department. Mr. Lindblad asked if it was up to the Planning Commission to recommend cYianges in this ordinance. Mr. Fitzpatrick said that maybe one of the approaches, less than actually writing changes in this ordinance, would be to bring it to the Council's attention ivhat concerns we have and what provisions "need to be made. � � Mr. Harris said they were trying to have one ordinance cover 1 many different things and he thinks it has to be more flexible. It seems like there is no easy sol�ution. . Mr. Fitzpatrick said one of the problems is how you allow park � �.development in some areas and not in others. � Mr. Drigans said we know that people signed the petition for � a tree ordinance for many reasons. No matter what changes we feel should be made, these changes will upset many people. He said that a solid approach to this problem would be not to touch this ardinance. � •'If we are going to have a tree ordinance, let's submit one that the City can work with. � Mr. Lindblad said he thought we should write some �that should b� in the proposed ordinance. There has park departmen� can do routin� tree trimming in ti7e � recommendations to be a way the parks. We should � . • �-T Plannincr Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 21 � �be able to have a City nursery and move those trees. He thought there might be a chance i.hat the sponsoring committee would be able to agree that these things have to be in the ordinance. 1 � Mr. Drigans -said we don't know the intent of this ordinance. We don't know the reasons 4,000 people signed the petition. . Chairman Fitzpatrick said the-�City Council has passed this ordinance down to us for our recommendation, and he thought that was our charge. With only two weeks to work in, I don't see how we can rewrite this ordinance. � • Mr. Drigans said the intent of the Council was to � ordinance down to the Planning Commission for a Public recommendation. If we can recommend an alternate tree sencl that to the Council for adoption or modification, � direct the City Clerk to put both of the ordinances on ballot. send this Hearing and our ordinance ar.d they can then the referendum Mr. Paul Brown said this ordinance was so written that it is impossible to live with. If those five.people who represent the 4,000, have already made up their mind that k�hat ever alternative you come up with, they are not going to aqree with, then you've got a refer�=TlC�um vote. This is what Mrs. Treuenfels said during the Public Hearing. If you come up with an alternate ordinance, the people who want North Park as a nature center will vote for the petitioned ordinance and the people who want a golf course will vote for the City.proposed ordinance. cahy doesn't this ordinance cover heavy industrial zoned property. Tlze proposed orciinance trom Edina covers all property. Mr. Clark said it covered all property except what was• owned by the City. Mr. Brown said as an example of industrial development, what if the Minnesota T ransfer Railway sells all their property North of North ParY. Say they sold. to a trucking company who wanted to relocate. They come out here and see those four or. five thousand trees and say we've got to park trucks th�re. This ordinance doesn't stop them from knocking all those trees down and putting in a big parking'lot. Bill Drigans talked about.the different reasons people signed this petition. One of the reasons was because � when N.S.S.S.D. whipped through Locke Park many years ago and made a big air strip out there, there was no reforestation. The City shouid have made them put the trees back in at that time. : . .. Chairman Fitzpatrick asked Mr. Drigans if it was his recommendation that the•City write another tree ordinance and return this one without change? � -Mr. Clark said that to alter the proposed ordinance to fit all the comments made at the Hearing would be impossible. The committee is not going to agree to losing controi of all.the parks. Mr-. Lindblad said that what worried him is if you have a special electian on these two different ordinances, and this would usually be a liglit vote, if the vote was divided by how they want North P.ark� to be used, we might.end up with this ordinailce that no one could work with. What would the City do then? � • � L� � � �I � � � � � . �- y Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 22 �• Mr. Harris said if this ordinance passed in its present form, we couldn't.build a road, couldn't trim park trees, couldn't develop eight park sites, and caulfln't construct any public buildings. Mr. Clark said that even if North Park was going to be used for a nature cFnter, they couldn't construct any type of building for this center if it involved tree removal. Brother Sullivan asked how these three trees per acre would be figured. In North Park far instance, there are 124 acres. Could you takr 3 x 124 and take that may trees out of one area, or would each acre be figur_ed by itself. What is the magic number? r�r. Clark said it would even be possible to build a golf course if the trees removed couZd use the entire site to fsgure the number of trees that could be removed. .' Mr. Fitzpatrick said that some of the concerns we�have are not incompatible with the ordinance. - Mr. Clark said t�ere has to be some way to circumvent only taking three trees per acre. Mr. Drigans said we could spend a lot of time trying to adapt this ordinance to allow development of Fark property and the other things pertaining to pa.rks, but I think we are defeating the intent of this ordinance. He asked Paul. Bro�on and Donald Blair if they thought the proposed Edina ordinance was workable for the City of Fridley. Mr. Brown said he thought it was. � Mr. Harris said he wasn't in favor of extending anymore policing of private property. Mr. Drigans said you cari change ev�rything in the Edina ordinance from private to public. Mr. Clark said that i.f the City Cauncil was forced into adopting the petitioned ordinance;they would really strap themselves. Mr. Harris said that if we don't come up with a workable alternativ� this could happen. Mr. Blair said he thought the City would have to come up wi�h a wor_kable alternative also. Brother Sullivan said�that if the Council recommended that North Park should be a nature center, it might stop this ordinance. Mr. Clark said you would have 4,000 people speaking for 30,000 again. Mr. Brown said the Cotincil has already mad� their d�cision. He � said the Planning Commission could use the Edina ordinance as a guide- line in preparing an alternate ordinance. This ordinance prohibits the destruction of trees. � � �1 . ' Mr. Clark said Mr. Nee had mentioned that there should be som�thing in th� ordinance about non-viable trees, trees that are not valuable anymore. � � Mr. Brown �aid there should be something about the welfare of the people,�and that's not in the petitioned ordinance either. He � � 1 � � 1 � � � � � � � a-✓ Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 23 said that he didn't think there was anything in our ordinance on who was responsible for boulevar_d trees. He said some people take this responsibility. He said we get calls from som� people saying they want a boulevard tree out for some reason or anoth�r. We inspect tliat tree and if its a healthy tree, causirig no problems, we don't take it out. If it's leaning, cracked or broke, then for the public welfare, it has to come out. Mr. Brown asked Mr. ClarY, if the Council approved an alternate ordinance, daes the sponsoring committee make �:heir recommendation _ at that time. Mr. Clark said the Council can pass an al.ternate tre� ordinance and the committee has 10 days to appeaT. If th�y appealed, it would go to a referendum vote. Mr.�Brown said t.hat if a compromise could be worked out befare the Council adopts a tree ord.inance, it wouldn't go to'a referendum, but he didn't think that would happen. Mr. Har_ris said he didn't think there was anyway to go but up because th� City couldn't live with the petitioned tree ordi:nance. � I�Ir. Lindblad said this all came about because the people want to have 5ome say on the use of North Park. . Mr. Clark said you could recommend an alternate tree ordinance c�ith the stipulation �hat the use of North Park go to a referendum vote. fle said if two ordinances were put on the ballot, it would just be voting on that issue anyway. If one ordinance kept North Park a nature center and the other ordinance allowed No'rth Park to be used as a golf course, they could- just as well have that the issue that the people vote on. That way there is less of a change of this petitioned ordinance going on the ballot. Mr. Harris said we have to come up with something because they've got us between the stone and the hard spot. Mr. ClarY said that if it was added to the alternate' ordinance that the City of Fridley do ordain that the issue of North Park will go to a�eferendum vote, maybe, as this is what we think the sponsoring committee is after, they will say that this is a good ordinance, and not appeal it. Mr. Harris said that if the petitionEd tree ordinance . passes, the proponents of`°the nature center have already won. � Mr. Drigans�said the people who wrote this ordinance should have known the problems they were creating for the City in other areas __ other than the North Park.area. . � • � Mr. Brown wondered if the City was �'orced to�adopt this ordinance, if they could amend it after it was passed. Mr. Fitzpatrick said the � amendmen�s woulci have to be.in keeping with the spirit of the ordinance. Mr. Clark saa.d he would have to have it clarified if the City coul.d amend an ordinance that was voted on by Charter. Mr. Fitzpatrick said some of the things that should be changed, could be added IlOW. Mr. Brown said that if the people signed this petition because ' � . . • . � � � � u � �- � Planning Commissinn Meeting - March 20, 1974 Page 24 they thought Fridley was wantonly going around destroying trees, he was here to say that this was not true, and he was responsible for about 980 of the property owned by Fridley. B�other Sullivan said that when he went around with the �etition, a lot of people were disturbeci about the removal of trees in Innsbruck. Because this was private property, the people couldn't do anything abaut it. They fel� they wanted some say on public property. He said,he was in favor of the petitioned ordinance, with modifications. Chairman Fitzpatrick asked if the membe�s of the Commission wanted the City staff to work on an al�ernate ordinance, or to work on amendmentsto the petitioned ordinance. Mr. B1air said they could work on both proposals. � � . Mr. C1ark said the City staff could do that but they would need �� �he input o� the Corunission to know ���hat they wanted in the ordinance. He said that Paul Brown and himself could work on an ordinance along � the lines that have been brought out at the Hearing. N1r. Clark asked if the alternate ordinance should ask �Lhat the use.of North Park go to a reterendum vote. � Mr. Drigans said North Park is not mentioned in the proposed ordinance, and he didn`t feel this should be pa.rt of the recommendai:ion. He said we should consicler in the tree ordinance if we think it shoulci � in�)��d� or eyclude private property. The Edina ordinance does have an avenue of appeal. � , � � � � � . Mr. Li_ndblad said he wouldn't want to have to get permission from the City to move a tree in his own back yard. He didn't think it should include R-1 praperty. Mr. C1ark said there are many cities adopting these tree ord�_nances, and mo�t of them are on private property and exclude city owned property. Mr. Harris said he tY�ought a 1ot of people signed this petition because they have a distrust of City Hall. Mr. Drigans said he knew that the intent of this petition was to stop the development of North Park as a golf course. Mr. Clark said that if that.was the intent of the petition, then maybe that's why the use of North Park should go to a referendum. Mr..l}rigans said he didn't believe in government by referendum vote. That's why we have elected officials. He said he didn't think there was anyone in the Cii�y who would want to see trees wantonly destroyed. They wani� tree management and this ordinance doesn't give them that. What I am saying is leave this ordinance aJ_one and give them an ordinance that the City and the•citizens can live with. ' Mr.. Drigans also said that he thought the ordinance should cover private propezty, especially industrial and commercial property. If tl�is property has trees,�they should have to come in with a plan , on saving as many trees as they can. Mr. Lindblad said a lot of' this is handled by t.he Building Siandards-Design Gontrol Subcommittee. � � � � °! ,\ Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 1974_ Page 25 Mr. Harris said that all the Sub-Commit�ees, the Planning Co:nmission and Council meetings the developers of Innsbrucr went through to develop their project, and all the way along they were told to preserve as may trees as possible. If we get more restrictive than that, �it will impede the development of Fridley. � ' MOTION by Blair, seconded by Lind,blad, t1�at the petitioned tree ordinance not be amended, and because we owe it to the rest of the City of F'ridley to develop 8 park sites,and these cannot be sacrificed � for the North ParY, issue, the Planning Commission requests �he_Cit.y staff to prepare an alternate ordinance that the City can Zive with, that pzovides in some way that the use of North Park go to a referendum vote. � � � , � f_J IJ � � � � � � .. Mr. Drigans asked if you could turn an ordinance into an agreement for a referendum? Mr.�Clark said he didn't know. This could be decided upon at the Council level. We have to find out if two tree ordinances can be on one ballot alsa, which I would hate to see, if the people were really voting on the use of North Park. If the committee accepts the proposal of having a referendum on the use of North Park, the tree ordinances won't have to go for�a referendum vote. Mr. Drigans said he couldn't see putting a stipulation on an ordinance. UPON A VbICE VOTE, BZair, Lindblad, Harris and Fitzpatrick voting aye, Drigans abstaining, the motion carried. Chairman Fitzpatrick adjourned the meeting at 12:02 A.M. Respectfully submitted, �'�`c ����- ��-�� �.�.��r� Darothy Ev�nson, Secretary r w, d � � � � ;� BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCO�miITTEE TIEETING OF btARCH 21, 1974 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Lindbl�d at 8:05 p.m. � r1EhiBERS PRESENT: Lindblad, Ton�o, hIEA1BERS ABSENT: Simoneau OT}iERS FRESENT: Jerry Boardman, � � � � � Txeuenfels, Cariolano Planning Assistant N10TION by Treuenfels, seconded by Tonco to approve the minutes of the January 31, 1974, February 7, 1974 and February 21, 1974 meetings as written. i1PON A VOIC6 VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. . 1, CO�ISIDER:�TION OF :� �EQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A'�F.IJ BRICK �L�ID CO'�CRETF. BLOCK GUII.DIi�G :=C:: S;'i%ti:=�GE PUf;POSL5, LOC:11rD O�t LUT 2Q, �LC'Cn 1, O�A4t':�Y F�I)DITIQ:v; "I�:ii: S:1;`•IE L':�I`:G ���1 Ei.'•i STi.EET �;ORTHs,r\ST, r�:I�I.EY, P•IINNESO'1':\. (i:EQ�`��T f3Y P��CJ :,LtiSQ�2Y, I\C. , 5920 RIRKiti00D, i•lI:\tic- APOLIS; ,�II\.�ESU'i:� 55��42} . Mr. Paschke for Faco l�lasonry was present for the request. b�r, Paschke �vent over the use of the building saying it �aill be used as a storage area. This building is completely separate from the large building it is adj.acent to. ;�Ir..Paschke plans on selling the present large building and keeping this building for his own storage use. , The Board went over the plans. Security lighting was approved as is. All garbage dumpsters tiaill be inside the building. The Board did change the amount of parking stalls from 4 to 3, so as to eliminate parking right next to,the adjacent building. They also added a sidewalk on the west side of . � the building, extending from the asphalt drive�aay to the front entrance. A S£oot side�valk in the rear of the building was added also to keep parking away from the building. Sh�ubs are to be planted between the east side side- � walk and building. The Board said Paco will also have to follow all de�isions placed on them by the Board of Appeals. i�Ir. Paschke agreed to all of this. � � i �� � � 3 - b40TI0N by Treuenfels, seconded by Cariolano to recommend to Council appraval of this builcting with the fo}lowing stipulation�: 1. Parking stall amount change from 4 to 3. 2. �Add sidefaalks� on the east and west side of the building. 3. Shrubs be planted between the building and sidewalk on west side. 4. Follow ruling of the Board of Appeals. • UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Lindblad adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. ctful ubmitted, `�'�----� err�Qoardman • Planning Assistant � The Minutes of the Board of Apeeats Subcommittee Meetin� o£ March 26, 1974 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Drigans at 7;35 P.M. � � MEMBERS PF.ESLNT: Drigans, Plemel, MEMBEI:S AI3SENT : Cro�ader, Gabel OT�IERS PR�SI;NT: Howax'd Mattson, � LJ � Wahlberg Engineering Aide MOTION by �dahlberg, seconded by Plemel, to approve the minutes of the March 13, 1974 mee�in,fi, as written. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Aribans noted one correction on the minutes for �he joint meeting of the Planning Conu-�iission and the Board of Appeals of March 13, 1974. He said on the iirst pa;e, paragraph 3 siiould be corrected to add ,�50.00 per si� instead of.just ending the sentence with 50.00. � MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Wahlberb, to approve the minutes of the joint meeting of the Plannino Commissi.on and the Eoard of Appeals of March 13, 1974 as amended. Upon a voice v�ote, there being no:nays, the motion caxried. �J � � � � � � � 1. A P.EQUEST FOP. V�1P.LA`;;;:?.5 OF : SECTION 205. Q65, 2�FP.T_DLT'Y CITX COAE, TO REDUCE THE GAI'.�?Gl: ST_�LL i.��.OL ; F.��:i-;F\T �'r.0i�1 11� STAI,LS P�R UNxT TO 1 STALL PFP. iJNIT, SEC`i'ION 205. C�S, 3!�, 10 Ii�;ST�1LL A CP.liSH�D ��CG�. DRIVET•IAY IPdSTFAD OI' 1'�IE RFQUII:ED II��';L Sti :F�1CT A::LJ�.'�dAY (t!SPI?�LT OR CU:;CPtiF:TE) AND, SECTIO\ 205.053, 3Di TO I2EDUCE �.'IlE 1Z;�OU?�RED 5 1Tlic^�CK 7.N 7'I'_E FEAR �'�'L:�D i OR A:�i �r1CCTSSORY BUILDI`;G 0.1; A DOUliLE F:0`TAG': LOT '_�1:0?I 35 Fr,rT TO 14 I'F..'�T, �LL TO ALLC�•� 7�t� CG'i�iSTPtUCTIQ;.y Or A DOU�3LE DLT�?CHLD G:� �=�.GE 1'0 BE LG�^�TED 0�1 LCT 2, LiOCK 1, PEAF,SOiv `S C�.2,1Gj�it;Y ESTt�TES 2�;D ��DD�TIO��. :1.'�:L S��.�LF EEI�;�.� 78S9-91 �.i.?:id00D G;AY i�?,E., FR]:DL�, MTNNESOT�. (REQUEST BY �LF.. Lf1RitY i�ILLLER, 7889-91 FIRT•700D jaAY N F., FP�IDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432). � MOTION by Plemel, seconded by �dahlberg, to waive reading the public hearing nota.ce. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Larry Miller was gresent to pxesent the request. A1x. AZiller said he is xequesting to build a 24 foot by 24 foat 2-c�r garage. IIe said he is requesting to put it 14 feet fxom the back 1ot line and 5.5 feet from the side lot line. He said he has a double frontaae lot, bettioeen kixtaood and East River Road, and the setback fox the garage is-supposed to be 35 feet but he said he does not have enough area to gosition it according to Code. He said the gurage will exit onto East I'.i_ver Road and the drive�aay is e:�isting now. He said the Building xnspector taas out to checic ttie location of the garage in relation Lo the lot ixons that t�aexe found and the Building Inspector said the locati.on was okay. Mx. PZiller said the gaxa�e will be in-line `aith the otlier garages on the street. � . Mx. Millex said he taliced to Mr. Fischer, owner of the property to the north, � and rir. I'ischer had no objections. Mr. Pliller said there�taill be 11 feet bet�,�een thc pxoposed gaxa�e and Mr. Fischer's garage. � � � Chairman D�-igans stated the Code says 12 s�alls for a double bungalow. Mx. � Miller said he only has 1 car and the Cenant only has 1 car so they don't really need a 3 stall garage. rir. Miller said �ahen he talked to the City staff aboui: �liis, they felt tliis was not to important. Mr. Miller staCed he and his neighUor to the north use the same common driveway.• He said he has talked �o her abouC paving tl�e driveway but that she can'e afiord to pave hex half. Iie said there are no other hard surface driveways in the � �% - ' � 4 � � � � � � � 1 � , � � LJ , The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommitt�e Meeting.of Maxch 26, 1974 neighborhood and he said most don't even have crushed rocic. He said he ielt crushed rock �aould be adequate and if he had Co put in a hard surface driv eway, he would be th� only one wirh one. Mr. Mattson stated that the staff felt thaC because of the neighbox, the Board could grant the variance witih the stipulation that; it might be put in aC a later date. - � Chainnan Drigans asked �ahat the �aidth is of the conunon driveway that is on his property. Mr. �iiller said the culvert is pr�bably 10 feet ��ide and he has appro:imately 5 �eet. Chairman Drigans said in his opinion, crushed xock cannot be restrained �ahere you put it, because of the lcids picicinb i.t up and scattering it and also the cars scattering in into the street from the spinninb tixes. Iie said these rocics can be vexy dan�erous on a Uusy sL-reet like �ast r.iver Road where they c�.n �ily up ancl hi.t ' car �ti�indshields . Chairman Drigans aslced if Iir. Miller hud talked to his nei��ibor aboui: the cost of paving. He said maybe she could atford to pave part of it this year and part of it next year. He said maybe Mr. Miller could malce sorne ar?-anoemeni.s to have it all paved and then have the nei;hboz pay him back. Mx. riiller sai.d he had not talked to her about l�o�a much she could afford and he adcied that if he had to pave, he would on�y pave his half of the driveteay. He said his half t•aould cost approximately $700.OU for asphalt. He said he thought he could pave next yeax because of tlie expense tor the garage this year. Mrs. Wzhlbe:rg said she would lilce to see that the Code �or the drivetaay is met wi�hin a certain p�riod of time and to see if Mr. Mi.11er could t��ork somethi.ng out tuith the neighbor. Mr. Plemel said the Board can`t foxce the nei.ghbox into paving her half of the drive�aay since she doesn't have a garaoe and she isn't asking �o build one. Chaixman Drigans aslced Mr. 1�lillex ho�a lon� he has lived thexe. Nr. Mil].er said �+ years. Chairman Drigans asked if any othex garages have gone up in that time. Mr. Miller said there have not been. Mrs . Ldahlbexg �.sked zohen the Code requirzng hard suxface driveways was adopted. � Mr. Piattson anstaexed in 1969. Mr. riiller stated he �elt the City should start cuti:ing down on paving sinc.e oil is so hard to get and staxt� consexving energy. � Mr. Plemel said he felt the Board should stay by tl�e Code and maybe stipulate .that the h�xd suxface driveway be Put in by 1975, since the applicant has stated he thought he taould l�e put�ing it in next year. � � � Chaixman Drigans stated the Board is concexned with the crushed rock going into the street and flying around. He said it mi�hi: be bettex to leave it as it is until it is paved instead of putting in the crushed xock. Mr. Mil-ler said he w�uld ratlier leave it as it is until he can afiord to pave i.t. lte said the only reason he suggested crushed rock was because Darrel Claxk said the Board mi�l�r be willing to go along with ii but he said personally he would rather leav e it as it is. . �A � The Minutes of tlte Board of Appeals Subcommittee Meeting nf March 26, 1974 4� �� � � Chaixman Drigans asked if the City has been checking and following up on the stipulations like this that have been put on constiruction. Mr. Mattson answexed that the City has, especially on neto construction. Mrs. Walilberg askeci if Mr. Miller �zould be doing all of tlie consL-ruction himself. �ix. Mi11ei said he._will have it doYie but will be doing the finishing woxk himself. MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Plemel, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, thexe being no x�ays, the moti.on carried unanimously. r10TTON by Plemel, seconded by WalilUero, to receive the letter of no objection to � the constxuc�ion of tlie.�arage and waiver of the required survey, from rir. Clarence �'ischer, 7593-97 Fiizaood �day N.E. Upon a vai.ce vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. � l � � � ' LJ � � CI � � � rirs. Wahlberg said she felt it c�ras acceptable to reduce the setback �rom 35 �eet io 14 feet to keep th� garage in line wi�h �he others on East Fiver Road. She said she is also c�illi�i� to go alono caith the size of the garage. She said her main concern is that the drive�•�ay be paved �,�ithin a reasonable period of time, pxefexably 1 year. Mr. Plemel said he �elt that on ne�•� construction, the Board should stay with fihe hard surface drive,�ay being put in within 1'year. P10TION by Plemel, seco�zded by Wahlbexg, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the variances fox the xear yard and of the parking stalls but to omit the variance for. i:he crushed xock driveti��ay and to stipulate ihat a hard suxface drivetaay be installed t��ithin 1 yea� from t-he date that i:he building permit is issued. Upon a vo�ice vote, there being no nays, the mot�on carried unanimously. 2. A REQUEST 1 pP� A VAP�L��?\?ti^,E OF SUCT20i`? 205. 05j, 4C, FRIDLEY CI�'Y COD�., TO P�DUC�: �'1i1� REE1R �'�18D � T�;`iI3AC:IC l�k'.Oi�I 25 FLTT TO 20 �: i�.ET, '!:0 ALI�C��tiT Tfji; �Oi`S'I'RIJCTION Oi A Dj�?r'i_,J�l:�vi� TO }�� LCC>>�'ED 0\ I�0'1' l. FLO�� 7, Ti:v�E�.�JC,C �i0�tit� ADDI7'IU��, TiiL S.:'1T�IE FE;ii�:G 1412 � NOfi7.�i Ii�i�TSF3±;liCi` DI��Vli N.E. � T�:IDI,I:1'� i�1I�;riLSOT�'�. (1�QU�ST BY :�Ri , CITRT:CS JOI�i�SOiJ� 2300 G�IILSOi S1`I;�ET, i�'I_i�,� �ai'OLIS, i�I:L"�iv�SOT�I.) MO�ION by Wahlberg, seconded by Plemel, to waive readin� the public hearing notice. Upon a voice vote, thexe beino no nays, the motion caxried unani.mously. Mz. Cuxtis Johnson �ti*as present to pxesent his xequest. Mr. Ekberg, architect, taas also present. Mr. 3ohnson showed the Board t�ie suxv:ey of the lot sho�aing the proposed house location ax1d also a sei: ot the� house plans, lie ex�lained talic�n they �aorked on the plan tliey didn't xealize they had to have a 25 foot set��cic in rhe rear yard. lie said he i:hou;h� they wexe told i� only had to be a=C1 foo� setback. Mr. E1cUezg sai.d they have contacted the property o�anexs to C��e south and to the wes� af this pxopexty and neithex o£ them have any objections to t-he variance. Mr. Johnson said tlie house could be moved �oxzaaxd, and ask for a front yard variance, but he telt the 35 feet in fronL- is more important than the rear yard. .He said since this is a corner lot, the setUack from the side streeC is a minimum of 17i fcet according to Code, but they are proposing to set it back 40 tect. IIe saicl the owner of ehe vacant lot to the south was pleased wi.th this setback as the future dwelling on his lot wiil not have an obstructed fronC view. He said there are some trees on tl�e lot tlia� will be saved that are located in tlie xear yard and will be bctween the �wo properties. � ' u ' , � � � � � The Minutes of the Boaxd of Appeals Subcommittee Meeting oi Mareh 26; 1974 4 C Mr. Johnson said that they had taken bids on the construction in January since they thought they were building accoxding to Code and it would be difiicult to change their plans nota and have a new design drac,m up and relet the bids. Mr. Jolznson presented to the 13oard, a no objecticn letCer from Mr. Kupcho, propexty otaner to the south, and a letter acknotialedging receipt of the approval from Mr. 3ohnson to Mr. Kupcho. MOTZON by P1eme1, seconded by Wahlber.g, to receiv� the two l.etters. Upon a voice vo�e, there being no nays, the mof:ion carried unani.mously. MOTION by �d�hlbexg, seconded by Plen�el, to close the public hea�ing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously, Chairman Dxifans sta�ed it seems the hardship is the fact that �he bids are out and the plans have been drawn up. He said there has been no objections trom fihe nei�hbors. . Mxs. W�ihlberg and Mr. Ple�nel both stated they could see no objection to the variance. ` r10TI0N by [�ahlberg, seconded by Ples-nel, to recocnmend to the City Council, app�:oval of i�he variance. Upon a voice vote, thexe being no nays, the motion caxxied. . � � 3. A nEQUrST FO?'. VA,I'.:L'l��v'C�S OT' : SFCTxO� 205:152, 2, �RZDLLX CITY CODE, T0 DrCP.E�SE TI?E �VI'� ��G� i�:t:0i?T `�':�r�D S'�<:j.'i �C : �?'�O-�I 117.5 �i rl TO 102 FE,'^',T, A.i;D S1�CTT_01 20�.0��, 4B, TO �trlliJC?� `�:�r i•II`i.Iifi�?�S Sl'DE Y'�.?� SET�.:1CI: T'iOi�I 10 iEET 7'0 8 I�EET, TO ��LLOi�7 7'I� ; COT�STI'iT�C`�I.01? Ui A Di ��'�G`1�i;17 Gt�I'.��GE Aiv1) Ai1 AI�D''7':�O;:d TO �u� r`i'� STS��G D;�'E�LT�`;G LCCrII �D ON LOT 9, �I,GC�: ?� F-1.T��r`LL'S ?:1_�TLP.SI��. I�.EIG�iTS,, T:il, SAi1E Bia�G 16� T�1T.`�i":liG� I:'Ai' iv,i„ FRT�LF;Y, �ITi:irrSOi".A, �(1'�iQi;l.�'].' Y�Y N�1'.. %E:1d�'iII LEI-LR, 168 TAli;t�E [dAY i1.E. , FRIDL1�i, rill�rl`LSUT� 55�=l3?_.) � MOTI0�1 by Ldahlbex'g, seconded by Plemel, to waive xeading th� public hearing notice. Upon a voice vo�e, there bei.ng no nays, the motion carried unanimously. � i�1r. Kenneth Lehr.caas present to �xesent his requesL'. Mr. Lehr said he was asking fox two variances; one fxom 10 �eet to 8 feet oii the addition to the back of the house and the other fxom 117 �eet to 102 feet for tlle garaoe. Mr. Lehr said he has tallced to liis neighboxs and has go�ten verbal approval from them. He said � he does have a 1eL-ter �rom L-lie owner of the property 2 doors down from him giving his approval. � Mrs. Wahlbexg aslced if he had any pla�is drawn up fox this constructi�n. Mr. Lehr said he has no plans drawn yet.but he eh.plained ttae addition will have a basement and will l�ave c�uite a feta t•�indows because it faces the rivex. He said because of I the pie shape of the lot, the variance fox the addition is only needed on the one �corner. � Mrs. Wahlberg asked if he presently has a garage. Mr. Lehr said he does have a sing].e car garage tha� he will be converting into storage space for la�an equipment. ' � � rirs. Wahlber.g said she could see where rir. Lehx is limited �n his lot since it is 70 feet wicle. She aslced if thexe are other �arages built close to tlie street. Mr. Lehr ans�oered that there are t�ao o4hers that are built just abou� on the road. Pirs. Walilbcrg stated 1►is �;ar�ge would not be setting a precedent then. Mr. Lehr said it would not be and added that the shortex dri.veway �aould save on the cost af a hard suxface driveway.. � � � � � � �J � The Minutes of the l3oard of Appeals Subconunittee riceting .of March 26� 1974 4 D MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Ldahlberg, to receive the letter of no objec�ion from Mr.� Beal, 150 Tal.madge Way. Upon a voice vote, thexe being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Plemel, seconded by t�ahlberg, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vot.e, there being no.nays, i:he motion carried unanimously. Mrs. Wahlberg staLed she had no objections as the garage will noL- be closer to the �oad than the exis�ing strucL-ures and theze are no objections fxom the neighbars. r10TI0N by Plemel, seconded by taahlbexg, to recommeizd to the City Council, approval of the reques�s fox fxont yard and side yard variances. Upon a voice vote, theze being no nays, the rnotion caxiied UI1c1I11I110USI.�7'. � 4. A RE U�ST FOP. VELR'L�2:CFS OF: S1�.C�IO�I ?_1��.0315, rRID7.T'�v CITi' SIGN OF.DINAIv'Cr, TO AI.L061 A]:OOF SIG:, '�'0 Li: :i:LC'!'i1D 1ti A LY-2 GOiyI�:G DI�'i:E:l'CT, E��D, SFCTTOiv 2i!�,0`:u, t., T.0 T:�t;�;i?_1SE 11I1' _'�_��'�IU:�i SQ'."�.�'�� FCOT �GF 0��' A'V Il?.:zY�C:�_�'LCATIO�T ST_G:� F�c�.•I S(1 S I_ Q 1A}:E F];LT TO 19E SQ:J;�1'�i� I'i'ra'i., EOTH i'.0 �^�LQt� i� ' `r'_ ''�Ox IDL'_�i ti:�.:'':C�' 1T � 4�`; I T;iE '`.]�l";...�Oid Os A SIGI�T `.CO �E LC:,�'�Tt:ll Gs: I'�'tT Os S.GT �, AIJDii:O?:`S StT�D±�r?5i0�I ��7�, '!.'ii� 5��;�sL f.�'.:�-�j�,; 5320 Z�tr1I,, STi E�.!_ „0:::�'_i�,.4S t. l�::CDLE�', i�i:'i.i�:�; ,:50'�.�. (P.EQUrST BY TiID1�.t�IvD CO�P�I�%i.i:'�t% �S, II�?COI'.PO�tc'�T3�D, 5320 i�.��"��'� STT'.ELT i�.E., I'i:IllL1,Y, I�IIi�i�ESOTA.) MOTION by Plemel, second,e d by ti��ahlberg, to Caaiv:e x'eading tlie publi.c hearin� notice. Upon a voice voCe, there being no nays, the motion caxxied unanimously. � Mr. Red Torrey was present to present his xequest, P�I1. Torrey said presently tlz�y are buildin; on a 72 foot addition to the north side of their bui_lding. HY said they pzopose to put this sign on ihe xoof o� that adclition and it S�aill face east � and caest L-o catch.the sight or the freetaay txat�ic. He said the sign t�rill l�.atire the midland "�i" and have the s•aord Midland underneai.h the 'fii". He said the letters in "Midl.and" zaill. be 1 foot hi.gh and the total height of the si�n wa.11 be l.5 i�e�. , He said the sign toill be inte�iox illuminated. He s9ic1 they need tiie i�ienti�icai:icn sign as most of thezx business is fxom out oF state and the people have diificulty in f9.nding the bu9.lding as it is hard to see trom the fxeet•ray. � r � � Chaix'man Drigans asked if the City has looked a� �he constxuct7.on o� the sign. Mx. Tox-xey said Darxel C1axk and Jerxy Baarclman were ovex to the building and looked ar the sign. � � �i�-s. FTah.lUexg ask�d how high the sign would be. Mr. �oxrey saa.d �he building is a 2 si:ox.y stxucture and tlie sign �aill be on top of this xoot and extend 15 feet irom the a:oof. r1rs. Wahlberg aslced i.f this �aas within height limita�ions of the Code. 1�Ix. 1��.�.ttson said Darrel Clark had mentioned that it was within the Code requirement on height. '` � Chairman Drigans aslced if the only xeason fox the sign was giving Midland's location from the free�lay. Mr. Torrey answered �hat i.t was. Mr. Torrey added they had oxdered all the steel�ior Che si�n because they thought there caould be nothing t,�ro�g �aith it Mr. Geoxge Barth, 101 lIorizo�l Ax�.ve and Mr. Fl�byd I:nutson, 100 Cxot+m Road, came � ., fonaard to see the proposed si�n. rir. Bartti said lie taould only objec� if this would be settin� a prece�lcnt for later, on the other side of tl�e builcling. �ie asked Pir. Torrey if thexe wexe any plans �ox the othex side of the building as.. 1 he had once heard they �oere going to put in a gas station. rix. Torrey a�iswered they have no plans Lo put a sign on the other side oi.the building and their only plans for the building are for warehousc area. �� 0 � � � ' � � � L� Tlie Minutes of the Board o� Appeals Subconunittee Meeting of March 26,�T974 4� Mr. Toxxey said the sign w�ll be back from the freeway about•100 feeC so it won't Iook as big as it seems, MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Plemel, ta close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, L-he motion caxried unanimously. Mr. Plemel s�ated it is a large sign Uut he could see tahy they Caanted an iden�i�ication sign seen from the inte,xstate. He said the grounds of this business are al�aays kept up and that he would be inclined tio go along taith the vaxiance. Mrs. Walilberg said she is reluc�ant to go along with a sign that large but sai.d she does understand their problem, MOTION by L�'ahlberg, seconded by Plemel, �o recommend to the City Council, approval of the variance i.n vic�v o� theix ha�'dsl�ip �or visual identifzcai�ion from the freetaay. t3pon a voice vote, tliere being no nays, i:he motion carried unanimously. 5. A 1:E�IJES.T. FOR �r�`�I:�'.�;CI,S OI' :. SrCTI0�1 205 � 134, 4B, FRT1;L3'Y C.T_7'Y GODL, TO 1.:�`Dt'C� 7'II� � � ) 7"�-�r,.. ;�. r� ; ' _— .�C� i� i ' ??T+ � � nr, ! �r SID 1�`.1�D 1_'.1:: �1,�i��:�:.�_<.t, 0� )�0�'_I SII):�.� Oi� `.?�7,� S`i�;:uC'�'ii..i��, F1,0.�1 20 t�isr:T T0 �I;::O I?i,_�P, -,-Y +.1 n - r+ � r �i � � n -� ^ ��l �, �r h . , /�+. � AN1�, SE..T1:0. 2.C:�.l.�5�l�.�, �.0 1�.I:i�li��l� Ti?�; G:['�� S';_.;�,�;'1' �.r''�t.T_CI:�::i S�'?Tr>GK, �R..�,i A LOT L:LVP� FRGLI 5 T:'�'I:T 10 l,'?=_0 I';�;:T Oi1 '?'I�, ItiOI':7'}I !..c;7� SOt17.=:i P:0" ��RTS.' Lii�;l,S .'?'0 t1I�T,Or.r ,�., � � CQ;�;S`i'I:LTC`.1;IOiv OI: �?ili�7�Di;G, ±�0 �i LOG%irf_'J��D 0`3 LOT 20� IiLOCI� 1, OidAl��x� r�--, �- ' 1 Y ADT.L�lIOi�+. 1:�_� ' S�`i}� t.'�t�� ���:; t" C'; � . ,-� '� � � � '�' i ��(�� - ,`�-�7 /n !1 r T v r , �� nrlr 789.1 _,:•I �E tI�L �'_�_.I�_�Fs,., i�I�CI��, SOT��. ����<<U��S_ ,.��. PF>CO Ii.GC...sJP,_�TiaDt 5920 I�l.�'�I:�?;OOD �''�.:.3L �:0�3i'H, ri��I:i::,��OL35, �ii.��:i;. 55[;C�?,) - ri0TI0N by Plemel, sGCOnded by Wahlbexg, �o waive rea�ing:�he public heari.ng no�ice. Upon a voice vot�, i�heze beii�g no nays, the motion caxried unanimausly. Mr. G�r.ald Paschlce �•�as presenz to presc�nt �he request. Mr. Paschke stated his � . bui.lding taent be�ore the 1;uzldi.ng Standar.ds Gor.nnitt�e and they changed the parlca.rig stalls i1:om 4�0 3 so i.he vaxi.ances on off si;xeet par�:ing will be witndxa:an. He said the only variances they need axe �c�r zero side yards. He sai.d this buildinn ' . wa.11 be jus� sou�h of 7893 Llm Stxeet where they also got a vaxiance for a zexo s�.de yaa:d. � Mx. Plemel askecl how taicie the building z�yould be aizd t�ahat i.t taould be used for. rir. Pasehlce said it �aill be 40 feet tiaide and wi11. be usec� by his compan}* �ox . s�orage space only. , i � , � Mx'. Ple.mel asked if anythin; ��as bein; clone to tlie alley. Mx. Ma�tson answered that the alley i.s part of the improve��ent project fox this year. Chaia'man Drigans stated �he onl.y problem tiaith this variance taould be tha� it would xestxict the size of a bui..lding tliat Mr. tlarris could build on the adjoining lots. Mx. Dicic Harris, 6200 Rivervieca Terrace, came foi-�aard and stated he came to the meeLing tonigtit to find out the Boaxds �eeling aboui:iiis building the same size buil.ding as tihe building at 7893 Elm Stxcet with zero setbacks on the side yards. Mr. Paschlce sai.d this proposed building �oon't res�rict Mx. Harris` building. 1 Chai.xman Drigans stated tha� rix. PZSChke, at the Boaxd of App�als meeting fox Variances on 7893 �lm Street, said Lhey might bua.ld an addiLion to Chis buildin� on Lot 20. He sai.d now Mr. Paschke is asking �or a new building and i.� isn't , the same size as 7893 �lm. Mr. Paschke said he �aoulcl lilce to build it L-he same depth bu� he taould then be ov ex the lot coverage requirement. � � The Minutes of the Boaxa of Appeals SubcommiCtee rleeting of March 26, �9�4� 4 F � Chai�nan Drigans aslced Mr. Paschke if he would be willing to grant Mx. Harris, in � writing, the xi.ght to build the same depth build.i.ng as 7893 Elm Street and also to havc zero sicle yards. AZr. Paschlce saa.d he tioould do this as they have had �o hav� agreements of the same kind an their other buildings. ! MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Wah].berg, to close �he public heaxing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.- ' MOTZON by Plemel, second�d by tJahlberg, to xecomxnend to the City Council, appxoval of the vaxi.ance �or zero side yaxds r�yith �he stipulat;ion tha� an agreear�ent be dxatm up Uy Paco, allo�,;ing T•ir. Haxris approval to build in line (east and west) taith , 7893 rlm Stxeet; and also that Paco has no objection to Mr. �Iarris havin� zero sxde yaxds. Upon a tToice vote; i:here being no nays, tlie motion carxied unanimously. � 6. A_ RFQUrS7' FrJR 11 VA?'�:L��?�'C� O.i� SF�CTTO.'�� 205.103� 4' Bl� IFR?'DT„�t cz� con�. '_�'0 Divr'�r1Sl; TIIT' i�ll���Z�:[�•1 ;' �)t�T"� D S?'i?!; `.�r�?:D ��rI�:CII I?:CLi7T; S i� I)�::L'TFt�'Al', 1I�.0ii' 30 ?: ��;;T 'r0 1G �^I �'3' _s 7;0 ALLG'>; '!'I;±� CC:;v':�.':�'•.?�C7�':� i^>?�; 0,� A 9 i'(�0`.r 1UsD?:�:7=0:�3 Oxti'I`0 i��� i�0�:`� � SII�'_? OT� �_�d i�_�"�S2i:;:� y^.:-^ _�mT; �i-:;, .-. - , '-Ti ` �,T --i_ ; � 1_, .. _ --� B�xL�_ x:�, }�o�n�.��� c� ;�,.�.c�. ne :.��L��L.z?r� ��.,D su�v�:� r o. �J� ��_r� sl�lll f.�,zl�G 65:_G , Tal1S'1 ).��:�?�P. ;:�<'':i� I� °E,, 't��.�D�.� YL��I'; �,E�O`�_�.< �Qii�;ST �Y 12:i.Vi:;:STDE CE1IZ Cdi�Sli� 65?0 �AST l:'LV�R 1.O�.11 N.r.4 �' ::iDL�l', Z�ITti:vI;S4`�!�a) � � 1- ' l ' � � , . � No one �aas present to p-resent the request.. Chairman Drigans read aloud t-he Building Standards minutes of Dzcember 13,11973 concexning t1Lis item. ; The Board �.�1eed thai: i:liey taoulcl li.lce i:he peti.tianer present to ans�aer questians about this conswruction hafore they ma�.° a decision an the variance. Z•i_s. Zdahlbexo questioned the elevaiioi� of the �oallc�oay and Mr. Plemel questioned the �ai.dth. M01'ION by P1eme1, seconded by ��ahlUerg, �o table t�ia.s iCem, to the Apx:il 9, 1974 me�ting. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried uzzanimously. 7. A R�gursT roz�. V�':?..Ai'CrS OT' Sx CTZON ?.14.0313�rP�T�L�'Y STGi�t OfiDT�I�-�CE, TO IT?CF.L:!S� TT � � 7 il i� ��l� T T 'n ' Y. �.`I ''?? ^ 1' j_ T __- ?',\ � �i ' 1'��E r1E1..?�Ii-�JiI 4��fL..a� I.,J�-'�GL I?0�. `I'r��.�_ ,:C D:��.i�C`�sU.:.'L:� SIG1�S : t'it���t 6 QUt.�.P�l: r:ET .C7 �r� c� ;� �� �, �r �,J� r . ��• ��' n 24 S iJ_/LI'.E �'r.�.:� �1�G_l irl) �1__';II F1.4;1 6 Sn;,1��.r _�'l;};T .ti0 75 SQUf�R �:�Ei�� �SIGi�3 ,f2), Tv AT�LOG7 THE �I'��CTSOi1 OI' '1'`.•i0 Zi '� r'iC DT1v7�.'C'1'ION:U� STGNS TO �� 7 OC �'1'ED GN �AtiCrLS 600 �I�rD 2400, S1:C`:CT.ON 11., `1-3�, 1'�-24. A�vOI� CO��";1'Y., ��IE SA'::� i�r�IG 550 OSTOs:I�;E 1'.�L�D I�.�., I��',:LIi�EY, i�fl:i�;:,ESG'.�A. (REQUGST BY iJT�I.1�.' �IOSPTTAL, 550 CS330P.ivE �'LOAD N.�., FR:CDT�I��z ril�d_vI:�Oi:�. This item continued to Ue �abled as no one was present to presen� it. � N ADJOURI��1E�'T : Chairman Driga.ns adjourned the meeting at 9:�+5 P.Mo Respeci:fully submitted, O �-t. � 1 r�x ��zr��. , Secret-ary � ' . • II 2Q � �v N ir .� Y j:i' '! '�J9' i � � . �r,?" r`„��� - , "'�� �•" -`.`�p° � o � ��/ 2 3 4�! C 7� 9 �,� ir i� ij �a i� 6 iP ��� � + ' � `� 4 I !-- \,�% �-' �f.��`�'"� -,,,,6 �� '` .;�o sa ~Z 9 ZE$ 2 q 2 4 2'9 2� y 2 Z� B 0 A R D 0 F A P P E A L S 4 G � 2 ��: _ �, t -. •r >;, . � .. i . - . • \ ,r `'c\� b , , � ' •• . . . �� 16,'w%�+'E IN v� `•�� ` ,�•� 3,.� . •-; Y;.\°' :.,,., ITEM #1 r � f r "t N +! 3 9 �• �J � ( L� � ♦ .. ! 90 � d � I ' . `O r 'I ) � -6 ss �j 3P �1y�:�— � 23 � a Z �� ��� r : L �4 3 / C 39'=�'� ; �.di� �.,' af � � � � :.a� � Z ./ �G� : l � »�4 ,� � � � ;, �i'� � � � j�,� � - - c .s2-- <l. � / � � xo ia �. � . �C - /t.'ss..-j �♦ �9,. �l ,i:f � °._:.._k� .� v ��`J \ • �-.�� : ..s< �z��; - �,,.=: �=; y 9 -f« � �� , �� I �� 30 � I ---�� � - � - T �:� �� �t��� �^ � �' " ? ! �/S G �/7 /6 /910� �/ � 'a < ��^' . .�. j i/ /� '3 i4 15 E � P 9 =t / �1 ,��,� 1 2 � q 3 � ' : : i h` �g�� � � �� iT y�i7 :��y �Yr '� ��o ��wc _ %�o.�� P��; � Z, zy� a:�� i`' �� p r�y �E� , ; . �-�t... �z - . � `:`..4� .,� .o ,.. �. � I .. =c - �� j � : �.� ��� � . o � �' .. . � v p �s � � � �,� •. ' � _ ' � D� 7c( �Y vr!'.'. ;�� .. • c �� ' q = F:t1 : . . _ 5f �+ ?C .' { a'f ': �� ' � � �, � ^l �w `;;��LF'�� c"4 4 u i, i`� � <yio �fo�. 3�, �8� � Q ;u \ �-':�ae ��-� --+-� �'' �, , � , , � ; , !7 f � �-� �7,:.�' ?t �i,?�iJZ 3/� _ �3�Ca.'2! `E - � 4 ° � 7 � � C� � � ��' �s ��6.�3_�r_ '3�2 / 0 9 8 7 6 4 3 zi 3:2'. / ��: � �c{ � ' �'"C I �.� � ix���'c''. \d� ��o '� ��1� � i� ir� �� d� � ^e�� � .....,.�._..�` � , � .2�/ 5�rt � - � x, � I � 'f.iic � 3o f'�• ; :��j �I"�',° �p (����.PS�� ; •c � � �f 3�% ��l �ti9 �3�� I,�iF,.� . o -� �,s. , � � 4 _ _ , . . .: .. .. :, .. .. `. 1Z' f�c / 2 r,. j��E ig 9 ic�;� ��s � s r;�.f��-,� a� . O c��^ �� // G/3l� .S/6 �7iE�/9�<c !•�2 ��� � 7jf ' _ ' � ` � _ J _i s �- / _ j:, f�; � � _ � r i `''_�/ •' � 5 •z,.� � _ � J � 2Z j✓ { a � � � ��� � � � : .. T.+< < !.� :. - :< 5.�....�.� _i._ ie I so 'dn jj� . . . � � 3 ..� � i ia l 3.^ 3c .r . w���.r•i � _,f i,., . R>>�-. . �tE- ..°� � � 6-i3S. ---� � /1 f �� o° iA� ',lI '.�'�°�"-° i , r i �C"i.°.: . . , .. .. . - -�4r�P "��z '�° °.......LG47.F •.. . � "' Zs�sc.F �rF 11F. 3s+6 i.2C ;.n. . 1 wa 4. ��. . ''i ,wi ' $IXI_3y.pK ' �ip p�asc�<� -cs. � �-» �!�(y. _ � `�$ . .?8o yo �' /JB /ld f? '� I.�.6 �iy� � E 'dw ,I�MYiJt�iy {'�,, � '• } ! C � v E � � �. YV� � � r� ✓4 Y .��i } ,��' .-�:° \ ���¢� �`�" �, �� �, 3 � � � � ` _ ;,��. a • /. � i � � � �1 " l �� ,Z � �f o h �J [ � �. � L fti�: ; . 4 � � f ?'� Q± j e� .�„� � � h '`i I $ s�.'" 3� �s � `'� -� F ��.'S'� °m� � �'6° ` -G�' � ., ;`•'.�..� : '� �` 4 �,�{.�'`0 3 , .�, ._ � T Y � �. _ . '$ _ � _ y� j , M � �y'�L " io�.; f l J ,� `'\ \ . f`v _ � �t %8�3 � ��� .�`� 'S°� � �'�' �45�9 f � � � °" 4 ' � a . � }�' t� � g�O °�' � '� ' �; ' �" ° a � � � o .y�. � � . _���,�'% $� o t" � 6`�;" i�' `��! ; �y�1 � ��.�.v, v � ,,� ��°�,y� S5i ' C ! i �° ` bt 'E � + e' . , J. � � ��s �� ""��� S � !/ . �:, � � ,� � ,�j ��.�� / y ' z � ! �'iSxl� ���' .1f i ' .g »� . c� i � � r .. ��� ��.- � _ �i $- � "'��b i � � .� _ ,., �. �, �� � . � � � 3 ' � � � �'� �-'� �,,� � � ;�. _ -7gb� � ;� � �L � ��6 � �;.�.��ti �1 � Qo� �.� Q� � !� �� . _ �/,/� �� � �' �� � o Lv � � � i�' � M �) '�' � � {, _ '�y �' > � fi%=�ev�°�.� � � � ' , � . . $ F` z� pti'� � Ti b t Vt Y'� 1Y'�I� y��' S, '. ,/ �► - .� , �-� ���r � �g � �.� � � ����.- ��� � . �d7 0 ��c-, � •�3�y� ` �y �. 1' d �,�`.� � ¢`�' �'..' g�,yrl/� � a 5� 9� .'G' Pe b ����4�� ���� M� ; s}� /, y� . � �.� • � � ��� { ��+�g �'„c 2a � d ,, v r ,�y t t� • � `� � V -���3 ,�. � b ►. s �,�, � � � { ��. ��;�' � � �,�r `" , '�° � d � �� b ,� �- .� � � ���,/%j a �- � *`�o� �` �� �•�a �, .��p ��s / � 1$ 5, "� � �,,�g . � v a �, !�^ ':;e'' / ''- giE� o.,E*P' +G ��"' �4, � �. �ii ,�� � i` 1 � ��f ,� �v � �) ►' �n /� � \JC/ f � �j ��' �� ^.'�i. . . �~��l�LS.ttitd f4�� . �LV R ��_(�� /I�IZ / \ .�� 8 � O� 1{� � b5Y�v1 . �� r�. - r� �,�. 3' �3� y�. 3.� g3 �, t� .� � a � . �r�M ti/ ,o � �. �j'�: . �'i ��`��i 1 9 ►•+° � y '� �.y$�� �rv ,, t�'+� ,� �3 � ^. ° �g �-.F,� . _ �G,6 � ��$� 1�{� � hf A�(f� �� E5 �f / t�.7 _ \ }� p,'1 �} 1 a r 1 � • i � � , .'�j�� _ � V �' j, Y-„ � �$ 44� ,C, �s� t• 5 � �,, `g �Q � / ' � 13 _ � ��', .. �,� � s a- � „� � -L� r ge� �L � �+i I�E�� /.'d�' !1� e.t �^'` :,,� �. , .i 9.F � �D `y t�� � �.'�'rire.� � � b�1Y'' e. �tit l�!� .. '�� e �$ �%� �' 'S. � 9: 4 . . ,� ��° � 9 \ �S� � J•�; �; � yi. �r , i^ � � 1! � � ,'g' y � ` O '� � . � ' + � j 5 � ,'S•M 1�.t` \ t'� � . J �� A '�i"§,�_Y l��u �a�5 �J�� a_ r�, f A2 ��p "J � r �� ~',�'�µ , � • � �f �6 � i h \ 4 rl sw� k'&�.�� �� ;�t .. �• e. a.. � � � � � a �q , k - �.��, �,` , ? �`ti°I v /�,�2b � ;� • ZZy, � �� ,�p�- �, �p; ;�� �o = � �5 � 1 15 l �9, ;.� I �� b � `(. .5 � `' � °r 1 `'i � � / , 6 � � � ! �! `1` e y ' � �' � �e � ` . it• ��,,, V � � `q� i9 �� �+� �, � ��� ' � ;\ \ ��� � � $,,,���\ '^ � ��,� ;� �;oa, �.4 . �o �� � F. $ ,� � ,;�� ��, ��. .,,�a 1 �/- V �, � s' � t, "d� � . � ttt � ��° • � i � ! � � �:�Z• �_ � � .� � z . nq � r a� �t t� +� � �-.�. �, dw�� � . � �� �►' .�� �a 9� 10' �f C r � - � y� ,-��° � � O � 3 ► 7 r '� '� •�� � ! � � � � �- '� � �_� \ R : '$ .. a �1 �' ,�$j� 6< <o \� i9 fi :� � � �� � ` ,� / \ � - y ys 's.' e°�? i1,1� �.�' Zi ;� �y� a� - �� . �� � j�j7 +' ?�<, �8 1 � _ � y� • � �p � .� 4� t i /�, j . ( b `�° p�1 , � � . BOARD OF APPEAL5 4 �; _� I TEM # 1 1 : .�'°.�l'�.t:�..��. � � {� � ''�`� T�"-_��' �i' ,�"i "�`��' �. � ° 1J �. °ati � 4i �.:� .� v s:....i �.;�...d :i .... «.+...e. `+L! o e� .c.� .�. �v w o � E�� ��v �. ��a ��at� u� u r�v E�ro s� s � � IAND '3�URVEYINO ' � , 30t�:8 TES71NC3 � GVVit_ 8a, [v1UNiC�ppL ENOINEERINC3 � . L^Np PLANNINC3 • ; �'-.� 'GQ18-5GY� aVENUE N. ,'}. ::=�'. MIUNEAPO��S 7t. MIr�N. ,, ._, � � •' '' ' -- KE 7- 3637 . _� � '^ I . � j � Y �'�. V � � i . m }.+7� �•� -� ,.i . li� 3.. L.�R�..� i.� ic� ii ��i.i� �� iJ l� 6x1 � ��4'}� 4��y ��''1��:.�I . , / . , . ' �� , .- j �W f � �� � 1 . . . , ; �'���, /^` � , r-�- � � - - . . , � � � � � � ` � �7 � �J , - . � '\ . � � � ��\ ' `� , ''`` `' G- �� . , \: , {.� � � f i '� .;�\ . . � - � � . , _ - _-r: � �:° �-�� , `1 �� . � k �' " \` f �! "` � � \� � ���-- r', ' ` �J / �r. ��5 � ! � . �� '=� . _ ..�, . -�� � 1. � '� a i a_ ^� � - � � �o O_ .1,. `'�:j `,.�_ ; � � / , � - � '.• fi �/ �� ' �__ ', ,� ��" � - � _ �. � ! � � j i - ' '\. � "Q 'G �f �\ ♦i �• y,� �Q. �` � % i ,� ��'� �\ �, �s ° _ /� . SC�L �: I -- 'r`?' �'\ � �� r . �, \ ,` C'.� � / � , � ' "p � ''. � , . 35 '�-'_� ,-,:�, ' �" ,., � � ` � o ; ��, . _ �-- �_ = ; : . 1 �.: � -!� � � . . . I cJ � . . v � ,! o_ . . - ; „ 1 \ � , � �� : ?�y� \ ,-�1 �� /' • .\ \� j � `�— "- . �.. !' , \�.- \ � . ��N 'ti. •:��� _y-� � � i � . . � ` ��, .. (;� • '� 1� ,\ f - . , .. Rr '1::J . . . . ' `� `�'+ � �.. `�. � • ' . . . �.r ; ;� `\�,\ ` . .� `\' } , �♦ . • • �\ � , `i ' • � \ !� oT � �L?� � p��,�soi��'s f-��C�1rr�� � S�r ��T r� �ti►� ,,�.� `,,, , , r �� l� �.��.. � ��-,U��l; HEREE�Y CERT�FY T:�AT TH1� IS A TRUE ANn CORttt:CT rF�rtESeN�rnr�ot� OF A SUf2Y[Y OF THE Bou��pARiES OF THE GAN� �9�vE UESCRl6ED ArtU OF IHC LoCAT10�.1 OF ALL DU�LUtt1G5, tF fWY, Tt{f.REON , f�NO Al.l WS1Eil.E ENCROACHh1Et�11"S� I�rtY, FRat�rl a2 oN 5l�1� 11�Nn. �.�INDE(Z ENGINEE_(21NC� CO., INC. e O�CEp Tnig � c�r.�foc_„ySr=r'?r-�.•;;p � __� • A.O.t�j_j ENG�fI{-r.6�J n.►i �SVRvEYO�tS . � _.a � "� w:r�. 6 ,--!r_�Cd _ 'ipto� _,r����a�s!'�-�-•-�' � ' . � A)f . . � ' . � ❑ u BOARD OF APPEALS ITEM #1 L,-� I, Cl�r"P.17C� �T. F1SCher' , o�aner of the proper_t}- loc<�tc:l 7�°3 � - at 7��7 ��iz'?"o�d. "�=ty ?7. �. have no objection to the City allo;•�in�; t��e constr_uctian o� a Gara�e � to be l_ocuLed at T, • �. T t- -, 7�8°—�l _+ �?""oo� .: �y �' .:�. taithout the i-ec�uia-ed certiiicate a� sux'vey tilat: tt�e CitST o�,ciinarily requires fo� aIl ncw con;{:I'llCC_LUIl. //�) � . f/1� \j�_ • �,r-_ V .� /' ` i' y '�'3 J��✓� ,.�.. ✓. � Si&nccl ' � � 7��.7 F ir';10 C�a. . '.'; ��r T.r. ' . , + Address �`�>I,rarch 11. 1.�;7� ��Date ,. .�i. "�- ' Witness � `' ��> ,--. . �V�� V..,��t?�,�0� � �.����. . �� �.,���.��; ���, .1�j��� , �. � ��.-� �� �'� � �� ��,: � �, 0 , ' � �� i /YTER BOARD OF APPEALS ITEM #2_ � / � ✓ � 24 � ` . � _ . � t. BA�s I!F +� :'L . �s.<a_u�. � .. , d'^tSl d.'>O ;.r.h . /i.�..;. /1..•a /II7/ .'. ill.:s . �� ',: i -� ^1� �t:r l` . .. /'' A .s /D 'r� ,+ y: � . - -�Y.iB79___. ,`ti:�q� / .+a � �.. ?. � �'� J 3� � � Y � - a, v � +� � :9% i4 -�, � , � ,•� , � �" . � 9 K:; B ; � r : �,; � , :' , " � 6 �.'� . � � gl�,,= � �5" �f�;;-f- 1 �; !s�'.� i� �,N, � A ;. e; , a s 1 _:�..�' �• 3-� , ��l ti'� �. ;.:,�3j � -^, y;i�2l ,� �i� � ;i s b�` �1�� A' �s. ti O o :.` 'v. � �!"� t�'" i s _. �a���%���y�= !��j � .a *y�,� ,a ��:� )t �+l: ti"r,f '� ,I �^ � ,�\ /f ,y , `s. � a f J � �./ �( �y q "� Z P�. ,f .•,ti 4 ,��, . 1'�- °�,,�, �.,' � ��� .1 ✓.1+� _a,-,w �'�' ;�"/�/I /'r� -9 �; t r,.��2 ' � - o .` ; ; I S(�?�' ; "'.,. , .-�--�r-•— ' 'S'-ay �7� % �ti�67`��' ; _, '��'�' � � � � �--- -==� -�'� �-�-i 1-� "�--�' .� � a ,. -` y ,�.+.oe � . � z n... /� � a .r� •,i y,.� „ ,4,' � � . � �1 � - ..o'�`g`j�r , " _'ti�:. ��'' .5' ' � i' e ; � ' �FE r��'%�4 �1 ~� 7�3 �s�YIQ�'� �, ji� >=� `' r2a�^T,l�z. �..�.a�;��� r }j��� 4 .;�����'yj , i ( � `, ` � � , , e �� t r� w �, � �e . 'i $��� -- -- � � � : - 7. � r � . . . _ ,t� � {�' � � ;� �� � ' )�;,Z`r4`�t>�`c�`�.1�� i. r 3 r,� ��'f�`� t �,°,�.��� � ,;� . �fJ `� .:�rf `3G.S! ta� , / •:. -. �4' l� '-' �,� �. �..s.� ` �..s1 E.b � �- u ,5 . � i1� ; . py� yA >i �'y 41� i � . : A i rIa �Ia�� ,CQ � ..�. � �'0 � .5°�+.� /��t� ` l ,w :jY �+� ,� �°ao � • �s � ���v ti�3 � � � j �1 � � r.3M 4656E - �. yf e.�a,� `-^ f ns -�^-. \ � /i5 6; s� t . � .R: d % �'y .i � �sr ' "F � •' �� 1 . �� + ♦ � . 3 � - _ . . �2:k Z � _�� .ri� �-'.>i � f/!� �} ! E' ♦ s �� �"� - 30�!✓ L_._�•rJ_ _ ..30"_ .Y�����1 =� � ;=�'�� �3� }.fV -F' ` '.�. .T ;�f'�'aV y; ^ � ... f ft /i `, �� � .�. y'_'� �� %:.; 1� i 7 +' '� � i �; �i �� �� 1A,`?�V..� :e.i � t� : ~* 9 �v ;, °,,.-�_�. .a� s�9� ., '��` C� ,•!4j �1 . R.vo:� " �� ', �� a.� ' � � � � ( 3 � �7 '� ; � .? �'� 4 �2 �ra Y . � o � `� • j e C � � Y ;� : � i � a ��,�''"��.,�. ; �. • ��xi ��' .3 � ;� 0' �y�,9 �w .� �:i, �,.J t.i .i �:t � , r �13!� ° � ,.� ` �'. �I � / "� � ' �� � �r � � 'ir?s- � �'.� s? .�J �� �/ �,h�J`� ;a.� � � ��� '�;� 6t �:�e�r"^�+� // a -�Iy\� j� ;,:wa�a_i?-'ki n ^ !� ���� i .� ...a' p .t ` �:�.3 � ,:�: )�,j � �,� ��(C• � � 1 � ' ��� j AIgM . �S ! � _ �j.�{ ��r L) -'�'- - � ! -Y � +.��<"w � /z °� � � ., .. i � - !1 R �. � 3 '� . . ^ + 3 b� I'� � � 3 ' � �� y . J }�� _ � e b; j � . � t y � � � . � ��. � 4' { " �.iy.�• .. �t: �,� s\ �!� � /�°i9 � _� ._ t' .`4.0 p. _, . �- t •J ,4 . 1 �.s'J 'F9"6JJS.� $�.� (/��/ s, .� r 1 �,� , F-? \ � 7'� •� � S �i'�� !�' '�' �±i. 1V 13 � (.�.�� ,:j r�� ^ / � t ip� � " '��; , ,;, 1 :-1,�oo ',�r. y -_. ,� 1 _ � � �, ,� � �i - ri..� z �: !,ra -�J ��; :`� ,1��}4 `� �;',',� ,�I�,'�' f� •� Y,, s �� � � �s,`��. ;. �j.' 'i: I ti rip ..l . J�L�-•(Le ( . a. ' --..�_ ,.c.-.:� . . - � SJ Sq D ;� , r.r ` S,;C�,w,,._.,��..%# r. � �. , j .� A'� k, , V 7 ; ,��,_ \o v � � � t � 'w� (p C� 1 '� _ / �'• J i,�� f_� � f.`'a.f � �- � j v�� � : j� ia'��i r � � 4 r,�_ � ..�"'�� ���� .e.y'� `�/ b aJ, ' � , 1 _ >; _ � y Y :�.a ` � . ,� �,'ti� � `�r ° :a /�7 ti..� + r/ � ��` �,A n a y,� „ \ ' J�+' � ..J2.-..�..y� . _,/�V+�.a � _.J,�� � *<t'--,� � �Y �i£ F�;q �yi //�� n.Gl } <` x .r,. ,z..J J�� � . . � r t � 6? � � ,� � ��. i �r ,.� 1 1 ► ' i ` ��� �'� t 1 \ \ \ ., � t� �! 1 : : � j � � � > � � � ,E � �+ �i � - �!a � r,t j � � � � y � e q �` � ,',-� � '> 9 ,', a r" $� � � 2 � ~'� � ; ° ! x:,• . , 7... � I�� y, �, .. ���. Yi1'--`a ��.. �d QJp/�' 'df,k� . /�j � t�y�� ��a �� ��- ^;e �` ._. � l..�rr.. . .� B � ✓� f�i.� C �' _ � � h 79 � � �,a �' .., .�� J., U �` . e ��_ � '�,"� ;:: ri ....�.., �; r. �"'Y l� .�y 3r ' �• � 3 ;Of -y� t . . �j ' � I� � '� - ' ✓ , a`:d.� ' _ . - �� y . � . ' �� "� l �e `�+ #i-� i� � o x � � x f ' ��: � i i � � i' h r1;'' '' �� � -1 . . . � � ���.. 1 � �B7 �y. x. , ( r � 5 �r � . -• � . l r�s1 ��;1 � �/ ���3,� ✓) O. 14�';?� 1 �;..�� � Y� -.�� � K� ', �SS�Y �?{'.�'Y ; � ����C� ti�, �� j e "'��•.•� �tj�-� �^ ; °i �1 �yR i � 1 .1 y ��} 6 .r f y+s1.� C' � 3�� � Ao � ' ., �� !V �i ^. iy� . ��. t 9 ! � 1{] ^'� i � � t � / ,'� -� e •,,o_ ��,x •, e , , S :� � -� 7 � �? ''� � �� i '� � ' �$ � �i � � � � 1: ',� �J \ �,.+� n� ,�..� a �`` � i ,�r iw ; �F'j�i7� :� 7 � � ,.� , -- ' ".. . '� � �y � ;.9.3 �'�_� '' _ � 'y .� � , -�rs_� �✓ �� � `\ , ` l ,� 5L? ��`5� i y� �, .�.� ,_ Z_ �.._�. ..��. ��- . ,ry ,: �5 .,:::�_ � � �•" �`� � � � �,�� S�'�. L_�- ,^,3s ` '. �, S �... � � �i! ��i lj!�Q'': ►-�"� [• _ -. 3� � 'J ! -�i �'3� � ��:i �'^ � tit� �"�"'�'�-, .�?'� - �, 3��.f•_� ,� :i5_ .�.�i ^�� _ � �_ '�:� {' i� f ,,�,, .�' ,:� � � !� ,:�'�� 3 , � >/ � 5�'E 7 � �� � # A� � +� } � � �"� �,�� ,l. .Z ��,i'3•; ,„^ I;� �. i' 3 r� -''�^'--����.._.��-.i�_ ��,r. i��� ��'.}-_�"� f� �;q �s', a` .����5� �;0 oe ,�, 1_/- i a��.�� �i� `� , � S � � ° .� � : ,�.>' ' � J -�- n 7 1 ,- : •. � k . -' ��. ' � a � /�,iir"� rr�. . t« �.J , ti ^ ;� 'y .: � 1 �y� r�' `j�� �,��'� ` o ��- ���. 7 � / ,a , � .� a5'� :r ,,�-y -�^-7 � � � � --. . � �a � o �'Y` � t J1, �f f� s � gS3� /Cl�. �•a` (}' l ' I 1 �C', ! ,� Y, A ' � ��� 5,jjp � ' � S:f�'��'^� �'�:r.rf y � 'S ' ��_ _ \ 1 � _�� 1 y �`!� `� r :+ i�,y � °\' -.� � N� � yY � � �, , � :: * � •, lo ,a : Yy o :� � �� t ,, x ..sr 7 � a a. � niW � '��'.'' " °~ ,�/ y ' \ l �� r,`1��+ J�� �� \� �� ��J 7 y%'o - ,.� 4 y�' �) �1�+�"s`i - �.-•� �� ` �. J.t�.� ,���� Z� �. .� �f�V ���� �� a.t � f �� � �o. . . � �., �- .. - ''�j � .-- �� '� J�CU: . �—_ : — . .r _ .s, �d%�°_. ' � ''� �.;, 9°�: ,-:i ` ' ( ; � , �`t/ / � , �d7% ..� �`„� "' yk ..�.�� a� "yi � . lc .�K ,u-p _ a�.� ry' ; �' J." ���' 5 Z ; !'',� ,qy �?r3'S' - �:_ � .. '.,," �t'�Si,7.7'`' - � p.� � ��,f .* '�"_ '' _ ^����- ,` ��._� _� ..� � : 5',�, r,ey, � p�1`.�J.J ; /,t�3� , .� ' �� � p,' j7� . � �: 1 . .- -" . _�_y /.,�f � � i�� .:d':I � �f��ln; � � 1�R ��� A - _ :,y .r� .� �f. . .. - J �� �t ✓Jg�K -�.n PC.. S,li' 1.'�.f �i'�v�, :x`y � �5 _.._ �_ `�,-_ 4��^y . ..' V - �// : � � .� * � .. . ' q� ' . '' . � r{ ��� 1` � i`J�� �i�� yt�b'4�iJy � S �% Z , �' ti ��5 /� ,:. 7 1'L`]'.!.+ ' � J d� � .." r . �a• .,rj.� f. h j•s. \�' �+ f. y p S :.r � .a'.�' �'i �` � s�j�� � .;,'� �s��. . . :� . k�jSi�-. �' � � ;; ' ,� } i; � a � Y'�d,.. �: ` ,>../`� � . s ��J j �•f.sl 4 � 1i17 �>� iM1 . pfi>. � L� 4✓�' � i . l-_ .� �, C • ,1 ; .�_ . N � ; .0 ;. �.� r+s � � �{°�� �� > �, i •� � /�..j�9 � �:.,.../e �% � .r I,�d�: � ''''� �� '`' . � � ; -n�'^ 'rf' �<Jf e ,. �.Nf.��, � ,1�*/ � .�, ti• 6 ��,:.:r i C_f1..]-.i:. �, .a.l.� yl ,r ;r''. . . ,�" .+�', �' �� � � � J �1n � � . .. _..,d:: .�--_ -� '-= � . k . .) �.� . p" � , � � . T. � �_ .-'� � �l,��r �i t �'� � � + ; ,� n •'. • Sa� µ "�nt,� � -ar--� ��._. � . T �/ � ` � ��:- �'g�/�1/ jE'�° , �� "�,w'-rv ^�� *,... �l � "d/ ;f �� a'1, ' �� � r �i �; � �°1 � � i� id ��^'��/�� ;iX /�. '"� . :y s�DU �� �5yt,t ;�+ ���.:� -, ... ti� ,� 4-; ��•' �(a� - f•• _. .`u � .. 7 i r.:;;y F�.:= �. �,' �� L.; h � .. �, ; ':` , � � , . � ' � BOARD OF APPEALS , � y, . ��,, � � F. y . � ,, ; . : , . ITEM #2 ' ,r /` , ° � , , �r_ � lpe� 'Ptann�ng ���I'• �� � l Y 11 � 6875 H�ghway .�' � �, to�d.s�rY,hr�n9. � • • ( nnF socis �r�����s ' � 11� (,Bl�'�'I ��1�, •���('• M�nn. SS43?. Civil EnAineer�ng �� ! Talephone 784•�066 r Qreo todc 611 MvhitiPal Engince�iny Fri,�3Tlf.''fjCS � �c SUI'Vf'�'nI'S ; �� , � �. Cu�T�S Jc�u�vso� , �Q�tYfic�t� of �urvey for__. � __._ _ ___ _._ ___. _ _____.._ __ __----. , ; `�� �. 1412 North Innsbruck Drive N.E. , ,�� �•� .±' ' '�� � . �1 C� ��.� �( �.�'�l;�i � � � �� ��,, ��.1�' � k ', - !_E, ` `' 4�,_ . . ' . . . '�_ � , �• ,1 _ _'_ _"_'..�'__"'_�" ""_'"'_'_y_ . ,_`\K .. � � . . . . , =� Ic^ • �J \ `�.� �1 . . - � ' . . ' � ""'_ . _" "._'.. �`i "." '_. . ....._.' - . . .. ' i�, � . . :� �o� . ��� `�'. ��~i i t_• p � L� � .. ' o ! � 1 . , � r� ', i..� � � , � � . 9 'r • . ��� �—^'] ; ,y c� 1 _'�7 q> _ �' �% `—•-�' � ` i C� � t`'?�"_' ^ ! � ' � S `:? � , N 1 J � Ir . . � L . �:. . � � ,, � ' �_' � � J ' � r�i���L r' ' , n � � . . . � . . r .,� , p 4.0 «o_c _ � �_d,. _ _ _ � ._ ?zao� i�.o� _ _ 34.s:i _ � r �, t9.D � � � 445D I . . . N " �' �+' . . , i ' - _ '�' 111L k�, . � C � �� ��,�.,� . . ,.� T � ' + .� ' b . N 4f j('~��" ;� �� .f. .. . . ' �� � -.__._. __. ....... n���__ .21 4.." _".� � . . ..__ ,I ` �� � . .. . . . t � . � ... � � � . . . . (, . "' . ��� 4 ' . ll . � �, � .. . ,� . . ' : ' ' ' :i OU ___�._..�` �' _"'�_� .__.. ___�..�_ , . . . .. � . .. --.��-=-- _��� �,. . �3�` t ' - f . . � M �' . .. . � .��� /� � .�.� � ., , �.� . , � . l . � /��� . ; .. �I �r? GtiC..- l�� C`J (/ e <� � J , C 'L-_ � . , •' � . . c/ � U � /�.. . L S , / ' / ' /'L ` —S ei � .:� + i S � P T ' � ' �-. � C /� � �,� C � �,v Z..,— Civ'L— �L `���Ue���t S i ra� ,a�� 4 i f,,�,,� LasEmar� � � � :�� _ _ - �UtQ+f�ri�G 4,ii0�f► ai2� QSS�.IMQa � v ��111�1�; n���l ���Grl.lr'i��1; � �`.t..� �?G� �:�. . . . l/ ��: � � _�� � � 1��� ��tl�� �� � . . t .�� � ��� � �a �� .� � � . � �N�)k;a �J��N7 � !, � � herabr�co.lely �hqt 1h�ti is o frun and co.�'rtt rtpreti�•ntutiun of u+ur�ry ol th� botindur�es o/ tha above ds�c��bad fond, ond oi ►he locar�on of nll bu�l�l�nq., thr�eon� c�nd all ��s�ble rncroachmen+�� if any� frorn or on �.,«�d ���,a. n. ����CyHa by �„r .�h�,. ...—:-d�y e�--- `�J--- ---_.A O 19�', � . ' �.• ' • . ' . ' � �,� ' � SU�URBAN ENGtNEERlNG, IMC. . �+� ��`� �����t Enq�ner�ti Su�v�yora �, . . >��/�.t+jQ' �y �� . : . , . , � . , . . � . ,,.:. -�._� .. .. . .. ...... ._.. ...a�ci. � �Y�. . ...__. ..._ . I_..�__�_.__., � . � . . �, ' � ' ' � � � - ' . .. �.. _ .. .,.. . ' . . . . . . . .. I_. _� _.___._____._—'_—.'_'____ . _. __-__. __ . __ ___- -_ '_._ — _ _. _._ _. __ _. __. _ . . _ _ _ __.__'.. __'__._ .____' _—_ _-_____._—' S ,- � ��;.��'�: '� ��/ �0. /, ",��a .J�'� A 1 }�y �fC . .l5py.�� 7��w�'�� . . . ,�Y, r ?s ,, ""°t �. . b . �. � BOARD OF�APPEALS ITEM #2 � ', �. • � `�.'�.;,�,.:= `y � ���� Lf ��9 `c��t„7 ��{/��sy�i7 -����A t�:J- S UN VERSITOY AVF.NUE• MISTEAPPOLIS.MI^NNN 5104 646-2686 � � �I �� � ' � � � � ' ' March 18, 1974 Lee Kupcho Springfield Homes 3713 N.E. Foss Road St. Anthony, Minnesota 55421 Dear Mr. Kupcho: ���� ; T<� Minneapolis Office Thanks for your kind attention to my problem of set - back requirements on the south or back Iot Iine . In order that you will have a record of my discussion with you on this, T would like to include the following information. Our architect, after reviewing the specific Declaration of Covenants I obtained when I originally purchased the property, and after reviewing the information one of his employees obtained from a phone call to the City Hall of Fridley, proceeded to design a home for me. He attemped to design around existing trees and contour of the lot. As presently located on the site plan, my home is 44 1/2 ft. from the east side lot line on West Danube Road. From your standpoint this is excellent because undoubtedly you will have a 35ft. set - back from V�Test Danube Road. Because of this set - back we expect to save several trees on the east or West Dantibe Road that will further benefit you. � Today I went to apply far a building permit and found that there is a requirement that � the rear yard mini,mum requirement i`s 2 5% of the lot depth (2 5e� of 105 = 2 6•ft. ). Our set - back, as shown on the Suburan Engineering, is 20 ft. This is the only problem area. After review.ing this infar���tion you indicated no objection to this variance and you noted this on a survey I gave you to examine. A copy of this survey is enclosed. �: Thanks so much for your approval. This will allow me to bring this variance to the Board of Appeals of the City of �ridley.Hopefully I will be able to obtain a building permit. Sincerely, � , � � Curtis W. Joh on, President ' ' CWj; jle I..��:., i-,-iii.�.'.. . . . —l'. • � _,. �.. .. � –,f.:. ./'�..���7 . . Y. . .�c.� ' � 1��.�"�:�: :.., �'�.�::�" �- , �. ����1� l ''- �► . '�°"�' , ' ' ' ' 1 � .� . , ` � ' . � . _ _ �. �j�� �, ' I`..� �� . _ . � . � • ' �� . � + � � ,� I . I � j � � � , a ;� �C 2 \ � ,.75�0 `* ?�P'A6 '��l �SS �IS� • /�(, BOARD OF APPEALS �� � �� – bt � � � �, 1 � f s 2�; .'� �5'�$ � ,:�� "73� o R(� \ '; ; I TE M # 3 . •N � `".� ZS�/� , ' � ^R� C� 9a so y ya � � � � o �,� �–in � � =, ,� � � , . '�y R_ � '' �:, . �,sQ� : y) � �_, N ae ,c� ��—��' � � �'� 0 :s 6 ��� � �e, r ' R ' \� s ` --� JI�1{D' .yr���.. +oz � da , • ! . \I'� r� �;4 w ; � : ,s ,i � /J�(�0 v V ��Z �/� � P/'�3. � � ` � (f�60,. "/ � s�: •, r � � . � '• tY� � � '� �,,�- .s��� '�a� ,�f�-f- � 41 �r��,0 . �r Q � ` . �b •'', � ; y `1 j � � � 5� ,� ��'��'��' � � �� ^,� � �E . , fa_ _ � .., .. '� `'� � Ej `�a �'_ ,�, : _�=✓-� ,� -- � '� :�d 5s ,� ` 4c>x�...:' � E:: _r: � �'� � � 6F3�•'� ,. �� : ^ �� .!� � ?� / a �s� f''' . , � _ � i ' � ti [F�y �'� ° 6 �, '� � N � � _ � at.r 4 !2� � �' .nA . dl ` �� 1�T , � � II - L7 ° � . _ _. , ' �' f�� � ' � �,n `.�� � ; s a � - r;� � � :.��T� ,6s � FF � 't� � �7.�'---;'o B ; `f ��� �"�"���;;� / l , � ��, � � . 4f � � � ° ° 9 ,��� ` 'F � � � � I, � ^ \ ,,2t ` �' � �c�72�� � a � \ // `/.Y 1 ."5 � �� � �jE9E `�± S d;': „ ;` f.yo�o, �� �� ,st�� . % ¢"� �'� ��„�"'..�-., � � . � � � - � 3'� 6�, - � � 6 � � ^1 y •'� O � l - ..� V /= � � g�bG�20,/ � f�°,, .� '',��. ,� .{ • �� .'° D �".J � 6c �a >,.�;-�_ � �-: �'� ' ( _ e�. �.. � i:! °� �6 , ,t1 N �' , ` � r, '�' / �' 9c 'S \ r:f _tij�.�,� K��� 1. ^ � �W / _!•/'V ;.C�y�l�" li . y _� � t i!t •�S � � � 1� � �h! � � '� �f � , �� l`� �' ��/ D�` t� ua�" � a. � 1� f�� �.� �C' Q� c� � 1� "� ! • A �� � � S, c R yt � 4 l '� � z�.: a,�.� ;z ;, / ��.: I � � �y ��� I�Yr � "e� � � � ¢ �°°- t.a�/o° o. __ _ ��-1 � `� � µ�r �`� Er �'� rJ �v ,-�i ��J dA � j�� / . � ��,;:ti.,. @°.° ���5� •?� �.-���lr 1 a o4 � � p {I� 't ,�- �.� -N - I,f l �-�'` �ao r� ; �:. �� F ... ����"' /�0 �, �,,,` ,..�� , t:�� t�• °'c�c. ' � A ( n: � ! V �� �� � � � � f ��V � � l S � �'���°° -.�� � �� /��, "�a�- ��� � �� � � �� �� � q '� � �V� `" Y,f�!�% � � ��� I � rP tya ' �.`� (�� �� � h j d, m �� � . i �'' ' �� i � �°� t: � ' z''�°' � ( rV 1 {1. i%• , '�s � �9 �f /j � Y Nr �I 3 �� � �`! �°r' � � ' ''� �„ �,, . � � � jI NI i%� � � � i � � � �- � � f ''�1 �o/ � ti � b r� �/ i , � " / � � .� ' j� I I 4`' � 51 � .�-:. � .�c� �1i nPO � �i � '� .ti � _ �Y a �' o, . \+ ; � �i. . �.? r � r: ss �? I , / �.. .P' . Cr• ' � " "�erivfF. ! � �! �/�67 tP1�i' l �y `�(y�'iJ ;� 4� �7 �g.� h.. �w i ;t; "; °°K � .,II• s_ia��G i �,: .,, : ���� -=r � ��---- ������� � 'N \ °��' O � 9 .n,`� � 4, � �j �� : I 0 � �ly� :',,�5. { R .a '% � � �J ! p-�� •.c�i ^�u• � � c� ; -� �.� �,�- R� �s is9 J c� e ` _ �... ' J? � I FG, u o. :f , ' _._. EB�%r; - ' `/ J %� Q�� , ay7/ ,�{ '` � f .�:.s.:�a��'��✓ � \-' o ! � L � IJ ��^� � d=I�j o ---""�T , -- t. y �� , ^i � � s� _., -� �-_"'�t �, h � �� f � w �` i .r=( . _� 1� F?` `1' � � F,.. `'z' _ /yS �_ e ���. I , tll: '�,a , ���A' ,• � . � �< N sz , , �. l. .. ` �'''P'�S �' ` /J� . ..� '; �- ` � o •;� t.� � _;��/'"+� - �I '_ � `'s5b�� tl-. �./ � �� �f.�97 �. � . 3� P N , - f t � �f� ����� !Jo .� 9 ,/�_F� �S � / 9 . . 1', a3'r - � ' ' � ' ="'�.�y„_-_E "' . -` < � �' • � I , f�' w , A = 5 c E _„_ . i T � '�N f�s6 � '—;— N / , i ' q . f��/ / � � `I!r �v� � b�" � �_ . , .-._. � land Planning Land Surveying Soils Tesf ing Civil Engineeriny Municipal Engineering BOARD OF APPEAL; cJtc��r���rj1 �j 6875 �� ��/l��il�'Pl�11�� •'ljlC. ITEM #3 � Telephone 784 -6066 Engineers & Surveyors area Code 612 Mortgage Loan Survey for v) �L.�� �. � ��A �� t-1 ` , ~C�1 {E: � IItC�':=�j{J 4 � �•� 7? ; � r� � � I �..� ; �^ • i `. l-� � 1 f � � ���cr� `; C/,:, � � �. � ` �, <\'it. i`' �.lL' .� ` �a ` i .S ,. L =��r,� ,l : � � \ . , \� ,`,y e��,e r, t ..� ^ ��,� `J� � � ��� . O+�'� � . . / . � \J ✓ . �Y i � v � �� � �.,. f � . y4— J - / Q �y`� ( �1 , � � ifJ' i5;�;:. ''`� ij � \ ...5 ,� j ` i3.6 � z: G v, ,c�.�" - i . � �LJ lL ! : 5- y� � /%I /C - �S r t'> ,; �;` ��', ; ��W�L�_' � ��i ��� j � �; � ��� � 1 � �a ��^ �-� � �•- �� (rl V � � / _0 C � ► �L� �.° �. ? � �t4l��� iD�. � a� tG�-1���5 �Nok � CouKT �� ihis is a-true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the to�d above described ond of the tocation oI all buildings� if any� thereon� ond all visible encroachme�ts� if any� lrom or on soid land.i This survey is made only in connection with a mortgoge loon now being placed on the proper/y and no liability is assumed except to 1he holder o� such mortgage or any other ioterest acquired by �he reason ol such mortgage. If is understood and ngrecd no monuments h va been �laced }or the purpoie of estoblishing ►ot linea or boundary corners. Doted this �'� day of �_� k�� A, 0. 19�. � • SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, tNG. L33� Enginea3s ; Surwyors I:7 bY . .""j � c.� "; ' �l%Z ���L�L � ' ' BOARD OF APPEALS ZTEM #3 150 TALMADGE WAY NORTHEAST • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA ! �` � March 21, 1974 ' . Mro Kenneth Lehr ' 168 Talrnad�e ?'�'ay I�T.�.. Fridley, ��innesota 5543? , � � ' Dear T�ir. Lehr: TELEPHONE: 784-6985 As a resident in your im:.�ediate neighborhood, I have received notice frorn the City of Fridley of the Public Hearing before the Planning Cor�r:�ission and Board of Appeals to consider your realuest for code variance and Special Use Per:r!it for the purpose of building a detached garaoe. This ietter is to serve notice upon you, and the City of Fridley if you care to use it, that your request has rny approval. ,P.s a m�tter of fact, I think it a highly practical request and ans:��er to a problem at your location. The der�ands of suburban living, especially if tvro parties in a � family tirork, require t�xJO cars which have to be housed. In addition general storage Upace is needed to house materials and equipr.zent used for hor_ne and yard maintenance. -� , L� � , � i 1 The general Pie Shaped dimension af your lot precludes the const- ruction of an "attached" double gara�e. The only logical and sensible ans��rer ,rrould. be a"detached" gara�e. This ti�rould perrnit living e;cpansion in your present house if you Urish it, increase the value of your �nvestm�nt, ana generally ir.�prove another piece of property in Fridley. It is my considered opinion that your proposal is an Asset to the neighborhood, not a detriment. . Your� r y, i i � � eal - BOARD OF APPEALS ( .. . , l , ' .. , _ . ITEM �#5 � . � � � , � ', --�-ri---- •+, _ ` . : � �: . � . �_ __. -. _ ...�_ _ . . -� --� __ _- �.. �= ._._' __ - .�... � _ ...._.�_ _ . . .. _ _ . ,.�.�.. ^ _ ._..._� �,.�. _____ _ I , . _;_`.� th - �-- �,���-���'--� . °'_ � . �� i ; . ` . � __.,�--� - _ _ ..,.._ k.._... �_ ��1 / �� � � - ,�_ -� �� - � �_ � - � �y � .'` _ , ��'_ _ : .: t; *: _ i.� � �� ,� . � �� ,' �rn V ! t � . �, { � �.� ,r. _� � t� � k �. . : �. �— x. . rr� � _ # � . -.'� _ � � �_� . . � _ � �� o �� � �� � : c t � . � .. *. @ ..t 'tss.sd...S.�..,�) .,�'-i, — {. h ' �'`t� . �. , � ...__._. _ . r I 78�h AVEN�s� Y � ...�r' ' .�,AZrt , � 4�?���-c9j,�-�.. _�_'� ". ��. ..��_. : V�.. . n'T:' _'�*,.. ,.. .. N.�. -� � , 1 ' � � V� : � � . . i � _ �. ' . .. �)�. . ..� 3'_ � I : _ ! . _ ..._.t . # � _. �.., _ LLi � � � . i � � . � , � . � - � � , . .." Y S� .. . � � � . �.� � 1 � � � I� M�,NUT�S OF THE REGULAR PARKS A�iD RECREATION COMMISSION P�EETING, MARCH 4, 1974� hleetin� was called to order at 7:"s5 p.m., by Chairman Blair. 5 MEblBERS PRESENT: Blair, Stimmler, Peterson, �Vagar. MEh9BERS EXCUSED: Caidwell. OTHERS PRESENT: Rollie Goodroad, 1821 Rice Creek Toad, 55112, 636-6421, Goodco, Inc. b1rs. Larry Lembke, 1505 Ferndale Avenue NE, 55432, 789-5628, Homeowner.. Mrs. Roger Arel, 1521 I'erndale Avenue NE, 55432, 781-0978, Homeokrner. Charles E. Rice, 1541 Ferndal.e Avenue NE, 55432, 789-5054, ]iomeowner. Ken Sjodin, 8729 Central Avenue NE, 55432, 786-0600, Counsel.or Realty, . Urbeck Propert�y. Jim Langenfeld, 79 632 Wa}� N�, 55432, 560-1969, Environmental Qual.ity Control Commission. Paul Brown, Director of Paxk.s and. Recreation. Cathie Stordahl., Secretaxy to the Commissi.on. 'MItJUTES OF� THC JAiVUAI;Y Z�, ���� MEETING� �. MOTION by Pe,ie�i�son, Seeonded by tUccgcvcf �a a�.��_;flnve �he M���u�e�s a� �he Prucfv� anc� Reche.a�',c:an CawES�.c,��s�.a4�. Mee�',�.n.g da�eo Ja�w.,a.t,a ,.�s 1�7�. The Mo�.i��h. car�u.ed. � RICE CREEK ESTAT�S� LJ � �! ' ' ' � � � Rollie Goodraacl. of G�odca, Inc., was preser�i. t:o discuss a��7.a.i:� he is proposing to develop i.n the ��r,ja.rnin �tree�, Ri�� Cxeek I'�c,<..;i a.rFa.. As iL ��r.esentl.y stands, t1��e area wh�.r.h has been. dESignated as pa.r'r. land �:��v1.d be about 3% acres in. size. Thzs acreage is slightly largcr than �I-i� nurr,�a1 EG% of. i:t,e tol:al pxaject which is rec�uirec3 to be dec�7_cat�d as park Iand, �ut because a�' :-"r,e lay ofi the Jand and i:he platti3ii thai. has been don�, th� cori�t�°acto� �s askin; the Gity to pu�chase the bal.a.nce of the ].and.. In additian to this purchas� of Iand, ther.e ;.� �he �.,� �si.bi].i.ty i:ha�. the culdesa� wh.ieh is loeatec� on the southerly m�st boua;c��xy, will ]-►ave tc,.k�e moved, cut�ing ir,tio lots 12 and 13 (alsa referr.ed to as lots 2Q �r;d 21 0�� eax] ier maps af. t:he axea) . If, the culdesac is mo��ed, these t�w� lots wi11 �S�• ��i,sidE:red u�Zbtii,J.dab].e, due La i:hr terrain, sa the con�Grac�ar would be dska.ng �::�. Ci.ty i:a puzcl�ase �hese lots, also. Mr. Blair, agreed t.hat if the culd�sa� has t;> ;:e moved, �h� City Council. shoulcl be asked ta purchas� the twa unbuild'ab1E lots. bir. Peterson asked what the Commission is e���<<���d to a.ct �n? T4r. Blair res�anded that we should repor� if w� wan� a park in �},dt ar.ea, and 9.�' cae do, �.f we'xc: wil.li.n� to purchase the add�.�iorial acrea�e a.nd. th� �ti�rc� I.ots < . ; . hir. Stimmler reported t'zat this is one area wl�ich we've consist:a.ntly had a majo�° ��oa.d in park landS.. �Ve have had monies budgeted fox puxc;-�ase of park properi.y, but: ha.ve not be�n ab�e to do so because. nf the lack of desir.eable land in that area., {Ve desperately need a park in that area, anu� Mr. Stimmler. f:el.t we.should proceed to c3o w}�atever is necessary. htr. Goodroad was asked if he had an estimate o£ the cost �o the Cii-y in �:his transaction? Mr. Goodroad didn't have any exac* fi.gur.es, but with the puxchase and �special assessments; it would run about 520,COQ to $7.5,000. hir. Stimmler asked h1r. Brown for the amount o� money which had been set aside in the Budget £or purchase o£ land in that area? Mr. Brown �-eported that theze �vas �15,000. �inutes o� the Parks $ Recreation Commission Meeting, March 4, 1974. Page 2 � . RICE CREEK ESTATES CCOiV'T): 5 A ' 1y10TIDN bu Glaacvc. Secanded bu S.t,imm.�e�r., �� neeammend �� �he C�i.ty_C�uKC,i,e, �hc�t �he , ' NORT�i ' ' ' � � h.e 10 o nec��ulc eyLt tlicLt ��te a,?� o r�wcclia�s e IIViVSbR�CK PARK� � C,i.tr� �a be de ✓� ne�2aea,ted m l3 unbu,i.2da62e bir. Ken Sjodin was present at the meeti.ng, representing Counselor IZealty and Bernard Urbick,,5837 Arthur Street NE, Fridley. h9r. Urbick is the ownex of three lots which are located immediately sauth of. his home. Tkro lots are �r�posed.for. private sale, and the most southerly lot neads �il.l and is proposed f.or sale to the City. This "lot is adjacent to tlie newly I�cated A-!'rame building which.was . donated to the City. The iot is approximately 86' wi�de and woul� cast the Ci.ty �. xoughly� estimated �5,000.00. It would require approximately 15(�� yards o� f.a:ll to bring the lat u� to the standards of the area. bir. Blair recommended that the Commission ask the Ci.ty� Counci_1 to negotiate for the purchase of this additiona2 lande He asked P�Ir. I3r.owi� i.f 3t �aas the znten� ��f- the Department to maintain a skating r.ink? Mr. Brawn sa.�.d that it was. � p�f�TT�N b� P_e�...t�et.c�an Seeov�ded 6 �o�. .tTie pT �vicej�.a�se�Tle.�d � � A- name e�c.� "Kg, on a p�`u.ee� �o e Pcvc a��'Ree�.ea,t.i.avt Ca � MOORE LAKE STUDY� a�r., �c; nee_ammend ��ict,t �G�e e c�� ��.t�vc'�-FJv-n-t�u�cucTz � UU���i.h, x.�A �-�le. �C_ 1����_ �e�� �s�.o�2. T12e Mo.t,cari cajcn- �.ed.' Caunc,c2 neqa�<'.a�e_ a� nne�s eytited ' Jim Langenfeld, a member o� the�Envixonmental Quality Contxol Commiss3,on and the hfoore Lake Study Task F�rce, �vas present .tc� discuss Moore Lake and zhe pragress an the study. blr. Langenfeld asked if the Con,?uissi.o�aers had received Gopies o£ the study prepared by National Biocentric, Inc. of St. Paul, concerning hioore Lake? ' The study which the Commissioners had re�eived �vas concerned with Iiibhland La.ke but �aas prepared by the same company. The Mocre Lake report �aas #246, daCed � � � , August 27, 1973. NIr. Langenf.eld said ihat he would see that the Gommissioners each receive a copy. This report�is a proposed study fox Anoka County lakes. .. There is the possibility that some federal funds ma.y be available for this study, but nothing has been finalized in respect to this. i�1r. Langenfeld asked if we were planning to proceed with our weed control £or this Summer and I�1r. Blair responded that ►ve were. ' � �Ir. Langenfeld explained that several well-versed individuals hacl been at a meeting of the task force and after listening to their plans for a detailed study, it taould be�completely impossible for a group of people to attempt such a task and have any success which coulcl be beneficial to solving the problems at Dloore Lake. '1'hese indivicluals represented the University of l�tinnesota and companies which deal �aith � studies of this type. Even if the data could be collected, it would be almost� impossiUle to compile it into data which could be processEd and conclusions dracvn. , ' - . �inute$ of the Paxks $ Recreation Commission Meeting, March 4, 1974. Page 3 � , MOORE LAKE �CON�T): 5 � ' Mr Stimmler asked if Brother Sullivan had been involved in these meetin s or had • g contributed anything which could benefit the City? Mr. Langenfeld said that both ' Ron Burton and Brother Sullivan had done a lot o£ work in this area, but that na conclusions had been determined. ' I�1r. Langenfeld reported that such things as "s►aimmers' itch" could be eliminated by merely wiping oneself with a towel after getting out of the water. The fungus would be wiped off, and in this garticular case, it doesn't become a problem until � it dries on the skin. He went on to say that he had learned �hat ear infecti.on can be found in people who swim in pools, as wel.l as lakes. Many �imes it's connected with horseplay. ' yx. Peterson asked if b1r. Langenfeld had contacted D1i.ke 0'Bannan, Anoka. County Commissioner, to see if he could assist wifih releasing funds £or this project? �hir. Langenfeld said that he woul.d certainly cheGk into a,t. � , �� There was some discussion of tt-ie sedi.mentation in Lacke La.ke, but the majority of the land surrounding the Lake is pri.vate property, so the City isn"C disectly involved. Mr. Wagar said that he felt we s'r:ould de somethi.ng to save the Lake, whether we get assistance from the County or not. I£ the La};e can'� be saved, the City will have to look further inta t�re constructian c�f a swi.mming pool. . Mr. Langen£eld w�.11 check with Ar.oYa County and xepor. t back to the Comr,�issi,on. IEARLY OPEN FOR MOORE (AKE� � Mr. Brown ask�d the Commissioners to refer to a proposed arti,cle for i:he Fxidley Sun which deals with the opening date ior Moare Lake. He stat-ed that the Beach would be opening the day after ScI-ioo2 Bis�rict �J.4 di.smisses for i;he yeax, and � his question is whether the Commissioner:; in�ended for the Beach to be fully� staffed or jus�C an individual on duty r.o tza��c� access i.o the p�one. Mr. Blair said that he thought i�t was thea.r intension to fully staff the beach and , install the buoy lines, docks, and 2ife guard towers. � � Mr. Brown reported that to fully staf.� the Beach at that early date is impossible '� because our staff consists of college students who a.re not aut of school as eaxl.y as District #14. Several o£ our �taf£ nembPrs are even attendin�'college out o£ state. � � � � � h9r. Stimmler stated that we can't do half a job. I£ we open the Beach, we have to staff it. 61r. Brown agreed, They discussed the possibi�ity of having High School students on duty until the regular staff is available, but agreed that it wouldn't really be falr to hi.re them for a week or t��o and then put ttiem out of a iob. D1r. {Jagar�stated that he'd at least like to see some buoy lines installed. Mr. Brown said that he �vante�t to know how they want the beach handled and we'd try to hire the staff, h9r. Stimmler said that we s}iould try'to staff the Beach on June lst, the day after School District #14 dismisses, and blr. Bro�an will report back on �ahether or not that can be done. � ' C� �iinutes of the Parks � Recxeation Commission Meeting, March 4, 1974. Fage 4 5C MINI BI.KING IN FRIDLEY� The Commission asked if there had �een any development-s in respect to mini biking in Fridley? With Spring approaching, the problem will be 1ncr.easing. Mr. R1azr poi.nLed ou� that there still aren't any areas where minz bikers can ride. hir. Stimmler said that as far as he was concexneds mi.ni. biking daesn`t ta.t znto our � realm of Recreation and we don't have to provide a place £or xiding. N(r. Petexson concurred. � STARTING DAT�_._FOR PLAYGhOUNDS, �ir. Brown briefed the Commission on a requett by the Pla.yground Director, hlaxine Boone, asking to delay the opening of Playgraunds f:or ane week. The rea.san f.or I the delay request is that the majority of f}ic staff are col.le�e S�UdE=rii:S hclC� C�OI7 �'(: get out. of school unta_1 the week prior to �:},c openin� of Playg��ouncis . �ach year, before the opening of Playgxounds, Mrs. Boc�nc coriduci:s a thxee-day wor.kshap £or ' her staff to orientate them with the progr-�.n�. Une of the proU1 ems �ahich t.hey encounter is that not everyone on the staff is able get to the workshop sa 50011 after th�y get �ut of school. , , � , ., � � THe Playground$ program is a 6 weeks progxan beginna.ng one week after i3a.s�ball and ending one week before Saseball �nds. Bas�,�r{21 is aai ei.ght weeks �rogr.am. By deiaying the opening daie for Playgrounds o;�e �week, t�oth }�r. ograms wi J.1 end on August 2nd. . MUTION 6y S�:unm.2e�c, Seeanded by ��lagcvc, w d�a.c� �h�. a�e.wi.vtg da�� �an P�.a-ygnound�s .to June. 24��i, maFiing �he, pnag-'�am eKd an �,cc�c-�� �n.d� The h1a�',f;at� ea�t�ed. .� �.� �tr. Stimmler asked Mr. Brown i£ there wer� any chan�es planned �ox i:he nioxnin� Baseball program? 1�9r. Brown stated t.ha.�: it �.aou?.d be �he sam� pxo�xam we have had in .the past. hir. Stimrnlex pointed out tha.t �ver the ��ast several yea�� w� }iavc had a steady decline in attendance. 'iher•e were only two Cub teams. Mx< Bzown said that it was the plan of the Depar�ment Lo sc>nd a flyer t_o the scliool.s jusi. befoxe Summer Reoistration, to arause interest all��ng the boys. Ii t3�a.s eftart f.ai.Zs Y:o produce a laxger turnout, the plans would be to re-o�,ganize the program £or. 19%5, AIr. Brown pointed out that Baseball is pla.y?d at four loca.tions. Pexhaps the anstver to the problem would be to centralize ba.ck a.i the Commons Paxk. D1r. Stimunler � He said that their jobs. , � ' ' s. felt that there was a leadership problem withi.n the Baseball ��rogxam. the Baseball Directox should make certai�i that th_� Coaches are doing Little Lea�ue Baseball takes a great number. of the bays �aho would other�vi.se play� �ti�ithin the morning program. . GYMNASTIC5� �Sr. Brown briefed t}ie Commissioners on the proposed Girls' Gymnastics program for the coming Summer. The program woulc3 be held at the Jr. liigh School. The charge would be $10.00 per girl and the sessions would be �or one hour a day�, £ive days a tiaeek, for t�vo weeks. There would be thxee sessions durino the Summer. � Minutes of the Parks � Recreation Commission Meeting, March 4, 1974. Page S � . — GIRLS� GYMNASTICS �CON�T): 5 D ' � h1U71UN bc S�nm.�eh., Sec��zded b Gla an, �o neeammend �ha� �he C-i,t Couvice.t.� appnave � e G-v�,Y�' Gc mna.��.i.e� na nam, ayi �ws�c.ue.,i � e Pcvi.. S Ree�cea t.c.a�2 �,vicee.ton �o ' naeee w-c,t �� e a�eaj2g�rnen ts vn �auting � u� �nvgnam a,t � e ru ey u�,c.on. .c h Sc aa�. 5an � e�1g Surnmen. T e hfo�.i.an ccuvc,i.e . _ �NOP.TH PARK. , ' � L_� � � Mr. tiVagar asked the Commissioners to discuss the situation with the deveiopment of North Park. He stated that the Commission has not, to date, taken an official stand and he felt that it was about time to �o so. The last time the item was discussed, , no decisians were made, pending the outcome of surveys. Now that the City Council has taken a stand, he felt that the Commission should al.so be on xecord. —,�vrr—vN� —6��y cv P��e �v cuc, Seeonded bc� S�,imm�.e�c, �o necc�rnrrend �a �he op a.s a a� cawc�e. Counc,i.� �h.a:t Non.ik � DISCUSSION: Mr. }Vagar said that it was tzme for a�oll of £eelings since the Commission has never sa�k down and disGUSSed. the ��ros and cons o£ a golf course or nature center far North Park. D4r. Stimmler stated that he had afitended the Ad Hoc Commi.ttee meeting, City Caur�cil meetings, and other such meetings, where Norfih Park was discussed, but in each instance, trie groups were firmly divided and nothing was accomplished. . Mr. Peterson ielt that it was unfaix to the Commissio» because of the history of the project. People's emotions, xather than logic, are i.nvolved. Mr. Blair asked Mr. Brown if he had seen �he proposal. by the Metropolitan Airport , Commission concerning the use of Janesfiel.d for a go2f couxse? Mr, Brown said that he had. Mr. Blair said tha� it was xurriored that the B].a�.r City Council had discarded the request, but he di.dn � t knov� �.f it was true . L� �� ' � � Mr. Blair agre�d that it was time for the Commi.ssion to �et the�s wishes be known. He said that he, personal.ly, was in favar oi a goJ.f course, because of the pxoposed shopping center which Coon Rapids,wi.11 be building, directly� North of North Park, draining into the Park, and the fact that the Fridley land which surrounds the Park. is zoned Industrial. He went on to explain that the Ci.ty would be accept�.ng a :iability if we agree to develop a Nature Center. It's too dif£icult to get monies H�ithin our Budget for the t}iings we need now, withou� addi.ng another. expensE:. Mr. jVagar said that we'd have a 120 acre zoo. He stated that he's had a tremendous number of phone calls supporting the golf course. Fle f.elt that it is the desire of the residents to install a golf course. D1r. Peterson said that he wasn't ready to take a stand. He has mixed �eelings abouti the development. Gl.i,tli fi�a.vr., S�i.,nrn.�elc, ccnd Ltlagcvc va�`.i.ncL a�e, and Pe.te�an a63.t.a,i.v�.i.►zg, �12e ,�1a�i.on ecvc�c,i.ed. � ADJOURNMENT� • � 64a.t,i.on 6y Pe.tetus�n, Seeonded by wagwc, �o acljacvzn �G�.e mee,tc:.ng a,t 4:45 p.m. 1'he next regular meeting will be held on rfonday, htarch 25, 1974, at 7:30 p.m., in the ' Community Room of Fridlev 'vic Center. . , . Respectfully submitted, ' ~ � ' � ' ' � , � � AUMAN RELATIONS Fe`vruary 21, 1974 MEriBERS PRESENT: Dan Fish, Ha�old Belgum, Ina Preiditis, Leonard Lind, and Karen Packer MENIBERS ABSENT: Nicci Nee, Katherine Moss, Carolyn Rouse, Robert E�ickson, Adolph Kukowski, Joyce Benson, and Arv;,d Hansen OTHERS PRESENT; Mrs. Hudrlik Mr. Belgum opened the meeting at 7;45 p.m. on February 21, 1974. The chairman handed out copies of an article on children's rights. He felt many children were not heard from and could not express their true feelings because they weren't given the opportunity to. (See attached.) Mr. Belgum asked Dan Fish to report on his presentation to the City Council, concerning the appointment of new members. Dan Fish said ��e told the City Council that the Human Relations Committee was i.n need of new members. He also recommended that the method of recruiting new members be changed. Ina Preiditis asked if the Mayor or the City Council had received any more applicants for the Committee? Mr. Fish said they were in the process of selecting new members at the present time. � Ina Preiditis questioned whether or not there wilT be any space on Cable TV. Mr. Belgum said he heard you must submit an application to be considered. Ina Pr2iditis made a motion that_the Human Relations Committee ask Mayor Leibl for some availability of time so the Commission could present possible � ideas. Dan Fish seconded the motion. Motion carried unani..mously. Dan Fish brought up the subject of Channel 17. Some of the members said they received Channel 17 on their television sets but it produced an unclear picture, �^ � � Karen Packer told about the meeting at Parkview Elementary. She said it was a very interesting meeting, although they had a low turn out. One person suggested the idea of havi.ng some type of questionnaire sent out with the water bill, surveying the people`s needs in Frirlley, Another person suggested si.dewalks in''Fridley, it would give a set�se of community, The topic of tot lots was discussed, where small pieces of land that the City did not intend to use, could have sandboxes and swings put up for small children. ' Mr. Lind said many times there is some business that has to be taken care of at the City Hall. He suggested having the City offices or one of the City offices open from noon till eight one evening a month, for the , convenience of the working people in Fridley. There are occasions when something important must be taken care of and it car.not be done unless you can get time off from work. ' , � , � Page 2 6 A � Mr.. Fish said he did not think the Sun newspaper did a very good job in reporting, the City could have a legal newspaper. He read aloud an article on Bloomington that had been in the front page of the Minneapolis � Star. This was a minor subject compared to the decision on North Park. A highly publicized subject such as this could have had more than one article printed on it. Mr. Fish suggested the possibility of Human Relations ' issuing a newspaper. Mr. Belgum said they could check to see how much money they have to work with. , , � � Mr. Belgun asked the members their opinion of suppo�ti�ng a group:co�cerning Indian n:atters wh:�_ch wou=d be held at A°�oka Ramsey Junior College. Karen 'Packer made a motion that the Human Relati�ns Committee support this group in any way they could possibly be of some help. Motion was dropped because it lacked a second. Mr. Belgum wrote on the board the following topics he felt the members could look into �:ndividually or as a Committee: Marriage - Family - Parent - Child Teacher - Student - School - Family - Children & Youth Neighborhood - Family to Family - Adults to Youth Citizenship - Voter, Taxpayer - Government, Board, etc. � He suggested the.members look into any area they were interested in. Ina Preiditis said she was willing to look into the area of schools. . Mr. Belgum said they could form a subcommittee and invite various people � into their homes to discuss some topics. They could make inquiries and bring them to the City Council. Mr. Belgum brought up the subject of hockey rinks. He said many of the ' ice rinks are not kept up in shape, and many of the hockey games have to be cancelled. Mr. Lind said the ice rink in his area seemed to get good use a'_?_ of the time. Ina Pxeiditis said perhaps the Park Board could send � ' out a questionnaire aslcing the people in I'ridley if they are sati&fied with the present condition of their ice rinks. ' They discussed the various problems children have in school. Mr. Lind said he could never understand why some teachers evaluated differently from one another. You could�have the exact same subject�from one year to ' the next and have a different teacher the following year, and receive a higher o� lower grade, with your potential at the same standpoint. Grades. depended on the evaluation of a teacher. Ina �'reiditis said a new method of grading is being introduced in some schools where the student outlines his , objectives before class. Everything is on an individualized basis but all studenGs must meet their objectives. � � ' ' Motion was made by Ina Preiditis to adjourn the meeting. Dan Fish seconded t he motion, and the meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, � � SL� Shelly rrison � 0 � � � ' ' ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION March 12, 1974 MEMBERS PRESENT: LeeAnn Sporre, Jim Langenfeld, Mary Martin, Shirley Kennedy, and Tom Sullivan MEMBERS ABSENT: Roger Kaye and Ron Burton Chairman Langenfeld opened the meeting at 7:42 p.m. on March 12, 1974. The slide presentation of "Operation Identification" was presented to the Commission and the public. They felt it was very informative and was well appreciated by everyone. GENERAL DISCj?SSION ' Mary Martin said that she had checked into the.possibility of setting up a recycling center in Fridley. She was told this type of program could be set up, if they found a piece of land in Fridley which would be suitable. ' This would be similar to the Columbia Heights program. The Metropolitan Recycling Center will collect tin cans, amber green and white glass if it is non-returnable. She made a motion that they recommend to the City ' Council that the Environmental Quality Commission participate with the Metropolitan Recycling Center by rec;cling metal, can, and corrugated cardboard, recycling within t`�e City, managed by the Metropolitan Recycling Center, in conjunction with the City of Fridley. Seconded by ' Tom Sullivan. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission could possibly find out from the City Council where they could set this up. .' � Motion was made by Mary Martin that the minutes of the February 12 m�eting be accepted, with a few changes being made in the wording, Tom Sullivan seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. s DISCUSSION ON TREE ORDINANCE ' Mr. Langenfeld presented copies of the Tree Ordinance. `A`discussion was held. LeeAnn Sporre made a motion that the Environmental Quality Commission recommend that the City Council and Planning Commission adopt the "Woodland Preservation Ordinance" as written, based on the overwhelming ' support by the citizens of Fridley. Seconded by Mary Martin. Motion carried unanimously. � Mr. Langenfeld indicated he would not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting on March 20. As Vice-Chairman of the Environmental �;ommission, Tom Sullivan consented to being present at the meeting. lJ � ' Motion was made by Mrs. Sporre that a new permanent member be created on the Planning Commission to be filled by a member of the Environmental Quality Commission. Seconded by Mary Martin. Motion carried unanimously. LeeAnn Sporre suggested that the Commission send a letter to the Planning 7 1 iJ � � Page2 Commission, thanking them for the opportunity to participate, and our willingness to serve on their part in the future. The chairman questioned Tom Sullivan as to whether or nnt he waiild be staying on the Commission. Mr. Sullivan said he would be able to, he had spoken with Mr. Starwalt recently and had received another contract. The d:�scussion of new members was brought up. Mr. Langenfeld said he had �ot been notified that any new members had been assigned yet. Mary Martin said there was a•�new developm�nt in the ares by Burlington � Nnrthern, She made a motion that the Environmental Quality Commission advise to the City Council that they would like to send a representative to work on the Burlington Northern groject, located on Highway 47 and Universitc. and County Road 132, in coordination with the Planning � Commission, contiguous with the North Park area in keeping with the n$t��ral entities of North Park and request Council approval on such action. Shirley Kennedy seconded the motion. If the Commission felt ' overburdened with this project, Mrs. Martin said she would be willing to work as liarson. � � ' � O � � � � ' Motion was cnade by Mrs, Martin that during the interim time befare they have the official by-laws, wherever possible, motions to be presented to the Commission will be presented in wr.itten form so that they may be more readily understood and discussed. Seconded by LeeAnn Sporre. Motion carried unanimously. CONSERVANCY ORDINANCE The Commission had looked over the Conservnacy Ordinance, and felt the Coon Rapids Ordinance was acceptable. LeeAnn Sporre moved that the person in the City branch of administration write a conservancq ordinance, based upon the Conservazcy Ordinance of Coon Rapids, and that this ordinance be submitted to the City Council and appropriate Commissions. Seconded by Shirley Kennedy. Motio�. carried unanimously. Further explanation or application of the Ordinance could be o'utained from Alan Hamel, Coon Rapids planner. BY-LAWS �: • The Commission read through the By-laws and were asked for their suggestions and approval or disapproval. A few minor changes in the wording were made: A conflict came up between the proxy and absenteeism vote. Some of the members favored proxy vate and others f.avosed absenteeis:n. Motion was made by LeeA::�n Sporre that absentee voting and proxy voting •shall be permitted only when a quorum can be constituted without either vote being used to constitute the quorum. No person may vote more than one proxy per motion, Mary Martin seconded the motion, Motion was made by Tom Sullivan that the by-laws be submitted to the City Council, and approved by the proper authority. Seconded by LeeAnn Sporre. Motion carried unanimously. 7A Page 3 MOORE LAKE Mr. LangenfeZd sa'id no progress has been started on Moore Lake�, because of a difficulty in funding. They are awaiting a progress report from Mr. Hutchison. Attached is the summary of management plans for Highland Lake from National Biocentric. Motion was made by Tom Sullivan to adjourn the meeting. Shirley Kennedy seconded the motion, and the meeting adjourned at 11:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, -�t-��4.'� ' �..>� ° �� :,'�2/ Shelley/�j rris n Recordii�g Secretary �y 7 }3 4 i' � - �"� �; ✓��-� .S ;'�-� ! � 1�a e� � � i � � �.I�1 (" �� 1 C , � I ► , ���.� ���; C�-� ._ .:��� � . ���,(� 223:i N/1PJVLINE AVE'ilUE. NORTH � .�r � . • . � (G12} G33•;3937 SAIPdT Pl�UL, tJIINi•lESOTA �51 1 3 �6 ,•. . 1 p�t��4 1/ � �,I � �•. ; . . . . � t �,'I� . . . . � J .� ± � - � � � j� . '.� j/� . . ,` , � � . 71 SU. �T'i' 0�' ����� i�C'}"�`"T'�' � �7S �:'' ,. 1_ �„�.T PLr�_�, � . F'OR i1TGI7.L?�!ID I�11��E � . . �. _ _ � . � . -. � �'ebxuary �2, 1974 . _� � , . �. . ' � � , . � " � r.- : .. .�. . � . ��� .. .� . . � • r . i � . . . . 7C . . � � ■ � �. . � . , � . .7D r�?�T�c�::-trrl�z' 0;3JECT�v�s r• o� tzzc:[L.�1ND x�?�1:� • 7�'he mana�c�c�:-�:�nt oajee �.i.ves for fiic�hlznd Lake are ba�ed on • our unaers�an:�ii.n,_, or the � ollo:•�ing uses for the park and the 1a}:e. . � . . . 1, �:ordia'.-� Park is an intensivc-use recrea�ion�� , � facility in ih� rni.dst of a Iarg� xe�;? dent�.al �. area.. �11 �.i?"�c�5 Oi th� p�.z-k su�pori: some us�. . ?_. Tne par.}: an1 the l.u}:e su�?port a cor:�:�inati.on o� •� semi--active, pass�ve, and utal.itarian� uses. � "� � . a. Semi--activ� uses are : - � . � . .....--s.... _ , . ' ��ZCIIICS • . . ' . . hikiiig � _ • • �• �, . � . .canocing . , �, ' � UI70�"C�c?P_1ZGC� r�creafior_�l gam�s b. Passi,ve uses are �hos�, ti�rhich a?-e aes �hetical� y � pl.easing, and utilize t��e naturzil setting os � the pazk, st�ch as: ' . � vic�aing th� acrua�.ic setti.ng oL -L-he park � vict•�inq tile fo�_ est vccre �ation �. V:L�Z•71I7� t:�.e bi�ds anel w.i�.dlife .• •. c. U�ti.ti_tarian usrs of tli� �ark �re : .�. . -:.::_ �.�,�._..�.,...e_:.�. . as a duck habitat an�. as a b�.rd sanctuary . � as a s�or:�•�caater holding �reservoir for �l�e City oi Columpil J=�: ic;hzs, ���hic}i can b� raised or ' : � la:•�ur_ed as necessarZ• to cvntrol ru;�off �•�ater • as z se�tlit�cT porzc� ror si.orm �•�ater • � . . TIz� �nanagcr:;c�iii: obj�ct:ives tow- iI�.glilanc. La.-ke arc, tl:ere- fore, t�o rnlin:aiti the l�zl:e in the r•last econoi:iical way for the 1�OVL' 11S�S. . • •, . i �� �� • . . � � � ^ . . .. . 7E � � � � . . •� , ' In the overall usc of the p�r}., the �c1Y.CG i.s. Up�cS.f ical�.y uti.lized for thc: fo�.lo:,�i.izg : . . � ' : . � canoe�ing - � ' . aesthetic appr�c�a::.ion of the lake . � : as a bzrd an:! duc}_ sznc�tzary . •- as a �� orm �•7"cl �Er' reservoir . Each oi these uses zequire that �he Iake be maintas.ne� � . � ' in a certain �.�ay. � . l. For cano�inc�, ':it T;?L1S� U� navigabl�. • . 2. I'�r aes-thetic appreci:,�tio�, the sett.in7 or natural �� .� vegetation and �vildl�.fe must be maintained. . :� �. . � 3.. ._For a bird sanctuary and duck.hGbitat, �he natu�a3. �. � vege-�ation mus�. be preserved in certain areas to � � protect the ducks anc� provic?e food. � '� � � �. As a storm �•rater reservoi.r, the �•�ater -level riust be '� :.� ' . . � .. � � . . - �� -'. � . a11.ot•�Gd to f.luctuate to absorb J.arge �.�nounts of � •:� � � � runoff.� . • , . �_t :. �. �: � � � � .� : :� � �- 1 � :.� � � � � . ��.. � . :�.: � .. . ��. � � . ... . . . . � , . .. . .. �. . . . .. i� . . � � . . . . ; . . . � � . .� . � � - � . . .� . . � � . � � � . � . �. : � � � � � ., � � � : � . .. . . , 2 :� ' x�nxr ��a� j�T���z��,�sFi�� � v��LV�,�rTO�1 . ., . 7F 1. Th� 1a}:e has a relatively large watersh:.�d o� 1.26 aczes, c•�hich is drain�^d i�l 5 storm dzains, The lazgest storm s�we� drains about GO acr�s into i:he south end o� the lake. . 2. ��later from �Ii_c;hland La}:� drains north to the znns-- bruc}: �Pond, then e�sf� i:o the Fridley Poncl �•�here it se�ps � , inro �che ground. � . � . . . 3. About 87 mz.�l�_on gallons of water a year enter �he 1ake. � r-Fos� of thi� �va-�er con�ains large amounts of seclzment and r.utr.ients, such as phosnnorus an:Z ni�royeii. - � �. Tli��se nutrients probably come fra;a: street dust, � �1a��rn £ertilizers, and d�ad gr.ass und leav�s. . - 5. The nutrients cause the gro:ath oi algae (mzcro- scopic plani-.s ) and o�lzer vege �.a �.ion ir. fihz la'•ce . � � 6. �The ���ater quality of tl-ie lake is�poor.: i-Ia�•iever, w� do believe that 5.t i.s not sa bad as to detrac: from tlZe , ' . • pxeserit uses of the 1ake, since i.t is not used for swir,minr, or �ishirig. . � • �, • • . 7. The la}:e is about 15 acres an area t�tth a maaimurt c��pth. o� ��eet. The nor-�h basin of the lake has ak�out G � ieet of raud, and the south ba��.i.n abcut ?0. � •' 8. Tl�e total volume of mud in the la};e is ��bouL- 100,000 •. r.uba.c yards, or G1 acrc-feet. There is 4<< acie-fcet o: mud ai: � c1cpL-h of f3 feet cir less. . � � � � � � �. .. . . . . 7 � � ' . 9. ThQ prir;iary plant :,p�cies iri and around thc laYe are: cattai�s, pondw�ec?, �nd ye'llo:a water lilies. Ef.ght . • ' � . - ' types of pl.ants, �our�d in shallo�� �,;ater around the I.a}:e, are IiillpQY'�.�ri{� duc}: �oo �s. , •. . � 10. The �•�atershed oz Highland La}ce is abouz 9 times as •.: 1. arae as i-=�c� la}:^. One inch of ra�_n coulcl theoretical.ly pro�- � J duce a G-inch rise in la}ce lev�l. �-� �he norma� .lake ���a `er � � � . � � - ,� � � � � � � � �.�:vel o� 996 fee�, a severe r_ain could cause ti2e lu�;e to ilao: . .�� 1.1. Flood po�entzal can be elim�.nated k�y loz•;ering the . � �,a}�e 1 to 1 l/2 feet belo��� -the normal level. . . . ,� � . . : . • . �.2. Locaeri.ng i�he la}�e 1eve1, however, ma}>es canozing . :� . around the islancis uif�a.cul.t, and p�rmzts the cattails in the �. �.northeast �orner :and the soutn end to spread out into . �he .la?:e, '� � ' ' � _ . � . � . . � . .. � • . - " . . � ! . . ' . � . � . . . ' � ._ .. • ' . _ . . � . - . �. � . ... • _ . . . ': :� : -. � : : _. . . . .� . . , . .• -�• . . . . , _ . . i�. .-�.�� . , .��. ..: . . : . . �_ i = . : � ... . .� . . . . . . . i.� � � � � .. .- � .-. � .- � � ; . . . � i�� � � ���� � ��� ��- .� �� � � � . . � � � � � - �� � 1 . . � . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. 1 � . � . ��� � = :�����. ��� ��.�� �:. . . . , . .. . . . .. 7H �:LCCO'�lr?TD1�T:10:�;5 OI� P�L%�r1AGE.•:�I�1`.t� 11LTF,f:�;[�'I'IVES t�ID CO.�aIDEFL��TIO'IS �OR ItIGiil.Z�t�]D T,Af:E • � • . . Upon evaluation of the us�s ancl present cor.c?itions af � Tiighland Lake, it becomes evid�nt that a nur��bzr of actions , are ne2ded.. � � � � �.. ]., Dl:�c?g` chann�ls around t�ie islands to a depth o= • .. fot�r iee�:, The drer_?r,ing should be planred so that all of the spoils can be disposecT of on the islands '. or by adding to the �a�st island. � � � � � 2. Dredge -Lhe chaiznc�. to th� outlet to a depth . of four '�� � . feet and dzspose of the spoils by fiZling lo:a areas along the trail near tre outlet or transport them to the �1,ow area an the south end of the lal:e. �ti �.- ' 3. Remove cattails a1.o?:r, the northeast shore to - � . . �. facilitate vie�aing ai the lake. - • � . �'. �. nred,re a 1.imited area in the south end o� th� lake .. � . � :_ . . • at the mouth of storr� drain "A" to a11o�a ma�erials -� .�� �� �. to settle out* o� tr.e storn �,�ater and to limi� the _. � � �g:cv.�ih of t'r�e catt�ils. � • , . ,' � . . 5. r'ollo,aing dredging, . cattail r� gro�ath along tne nor �n- . . w, ea�t: shore shoutd b� limited t��i�h herbicides such as � D�lap�n., tJa�er lilies encrouct�ing on channels can „-_'."" � : � . . � be controll�d �vith sil.vex-t�pe lierbica.c�es. Care . ____-- -- ___. ---- • sl�ould Ue �al:cn i:o p�e��ent �•}:il.liiig duc}: food platlts, : such as �•rapa�.o or ducl: potato, ��hich gro.as a�.onc� tl�e north�,rest share. � . ' � � . . , .. , 5 . , ' . •. • • . • . . ' • � • : • ' ' ' ' . 7� � • . . ' _ . . . . . 1• . � G. n�ter. dreclgincJ, the tslands shoulcl be repl�inted ��Tith � • wil.lo:•�s ancl otli-r_r rapiclly c�ro�•�ing ground cov�r to ', .' revent erc�s�.on arid promot.e c�uc� nc.si:.ing and �•�ild- P life habz�atio7, : �� . � . � � . : . . , . �. . . • . . . � � . . . � • - .- . ' `.- . ' � : . � � � . �. . . . . . , . . � � • . _ . . . . � . . . � . . : : . . . ; � - . . . . . - � � ' ' ' � �. : . ' _. .� � �..'-. . - � . • : �. � . .. � . . . - . . ' ' _. . ' ' � �. . � : �: - . . . . . . . - . � � . . � . � . � , . .�. : . . , - -. . ' . _ • .. . , . � .. . . . , . • . . . : . .. . , � . • . . . � . . , . . . ' ' . • -. � .- ', . . _ '. . - � . . . .. � , .. ., . . «� ' � • � �� ' .. . ' ; . � , . ' . . . . . . . � '' . . � . � � . � ' • . I. ..� • •. . . . f , �' :, ■ � ____.— _--- . ___._ _ -- -- -- ---. f'ti F;1<.'�'; c,l' ���•- -- —_._ UU:i_F.7 t,R�: / � ,.�°,.,�,°,��`'•.� �:.�r:.^,,.,,, r.�:c, ......�.� � . .:.:.., i:�:; i';l _::� :i i,: \ Eoir�l�_.'':'.':) L.;�::►; � 290 Gubic y'ords � � Oi Sr•�iI1 --- � t �>� %C:t_j\ I l) L: t.i�:�::Ci: t7 i Dr�d;�d io �r •�•-.'- :.� ��-.� ,.� ' �� Fcci Cepta �;���•� f��::=�>.�, �'^''..... `T`t . � � � �, .-�- �= U:� ,�.a�_ :.:.::J r� �. ��a.+.��....-..w '�/� �`` " � I '/ � /' �' 1i ! r. ' _ — '— '---�� � � .�:; r� '~-- -- � i t t �•`.'--C:1:7C,1t f;=�IC;`�:.L / �� �" _ ' —_ �;,=� -- —';-�-c�:;`--..— � ��.��_� �,�`,��C�3 Fe:t L:•;.; ; ; --3�3,� . --__ f-=<;," . . . :�� ,� Y:\�� .,' .`.� f-;.:� t�rs�,: i � ��� � .� . ,•..,....��"."� �+��t��; �\ ��:,ti? Fe:t U��� / i �i �� . v , .�' :. .'_ :�.�'•._._.�1�.`.•.�.-' , - � � � � _`� : y�- : ,,•:., � ` �` �'a� 13� C'�4` YCrda / I � `i'f �./'°: `� � `` �� �..:�,� .\\ ♦ '�.,•�( .y:�a• j � / \ ���� ,r _,.."` �( . � ♦ � � ..._.., r-� \ 1 � / \ ,' �`\\�•' �'`'��- : , ' 'r''`i. ' ��`�'•. � � � �.` ��,,\'�. � 17�S7 IS! A'�� , • . '\ I � �`',�:��\\ � I tj- . 1 ; �`� �, ��'�'`��. �� J �c;=i i'f f%;'?'i} �� � .a,�� f , 1 \ ��.��'�•�t'.�tt, ~� ^ 7:] � � � � `�. �' �`��.,���± I � \ \` �``\ ` :l y °!�? .p �y. F�2 •'� ` \� �. 1 �` �` ♦\` ��\.:` .IS �� �> -,' . ` � � •:`�. ��I t � �� � � • ir . -; � ,". ; Et:S"I' {S! l,?tt� : ; `• �. � ` i`\�� � �� ;, � � � •, + � ��. � r ♦ ♦ '',�� � � iG r�?d vi $;.ei°- �' `•,`� � � � gn� �•,�, ,. '; _. ___..-�-:�. :: '.;. • � �_ � � � � :. .�. , ..�' � l.rn i ;�v ♦ � ♦ ( ��'� ,'\:':iCJ'l �J�_F�.i� ! . �`� ' � \ \ \ � � � '� '�. f ( C (��. . • '• , r� , �� ♦ \ . 1 � ���� .� E7:�r';?,ji(�`3 � �\\�• �•...:� ;.i�.?'1.,.>JO $.'�. }. . ' •�:,1 � \� ,� � 1 � � � � �\��\�\ \� � �\\� t ;// �� �� 1 f ( .; .t \����\`\�•�•\;� \` .t�.`�'t' • `� �� � i � ��....-.- r�� \ ��� `. \�,` � , � �......,..�—� . f � �' y/r• ' \ � �� ,' �S � • > > � � � 6 Fc�t e! S�,�iia �� \�.,^. . ,,,,.i��,..-_r,� :,•�. ••,: � � � � � 1 ♦ . \` �� � • • ` ' '��,\��� ���'�1� �`� � � � ♦ Af£7 � �•., •��. ���,� / / � \ `� �2�rr� $y^. F�. �♦ \\� \ t � � yi� C::�t?�ti�� so o so iqo �,' , �.,___`'y . `� �\��\,�. :���?��X. so F��t �v;�� CAL� I:V FEET � ;�/� j �� ��` � i� �rsJ��d io 4 Fcct U:;ih � , r r � / �'�'U') C�Sic Y•�rds of Sp�;;s t � � �/ /! � / � � � � � � � ' , , � H/Gh� �� �JD L Ah t , , � � . i� � � _ , ,� i i , ► . ► � � t � � �,, � f . � � �_ �_ __._ _--_� , �� , `` �� . i ,'� ,�� ,'� � ti i �. i �� ��—___ _ _���` � .�� i i � � i � ' `� ' — — -. ' � � �1 �! - i� � � �- `'---�'i-'",�`��! j� /, ��' ��' • • � , ' � L_J � � � E�� REPORT OUTLINING THE CONCERNS AND POSITIVE ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY REGARDING THE PRESERVATION OF RICE CREEK AND LOCKE LAKE FROM 1955 TO DATE INTRODUCTION This report is prepared in response to the instructions of the City Council as indicated in the minutes of the Council Meeting of January 14, 1974. The re- port is based on correspondence, resolutions, ordinances and other pertinent information which indicates the City of Fridley's concern and positive action re- garding the preservation of Rice Creek and Locke Lake. Due to tlie voluminous amount of material collected, all specific information cannot Ue included in the report; however, included in your agenda folder is a sununary of the material that has b een bound separately and arranged in chronolog- ical order with specific concerns and positive action noted. This material is available for revie�a and future use if investigation of a specific nature is required. CONCERNS AND POSITIVE ACTION , 'Through the years, problems which have developed into a potential hazard to the preservation of Rice Creek and Locke Lake, have b een noted to be b asically a reduction of the water quality and an increase in siltation and bank erosion. � The problems have developed in a number of iaays: illegal dumping of pollutants, development of property adjacent to the water body, creek crossings, storm sewer systems outletting into the water body and a general littering of the creek and lake. � LJ r ' idATER QUALITY CONTROL As early as 1959 the City of Fridley has been concerned with the water quality of Rice Creek and Locke Lake. Through the years, the City has cooperated with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Public Health De- partment in a survelliance p�ogram instituted to eliminate the dumping of industrial wastes and washing of oil spills and other pollutants into Rice Creek and Locke Lake. Upon observation of po?lutants in the water body, an investiga- tion is made in order to determine the source of contamination. After the source is found, appropriate correspondence and meetings are held to eliminate the prob lem. ,�' � � Together with continuous inspection of the water body within the Fridley corporate limits, Fridley has shown concern for pollution of the water b ody by other agencies and municipalities adjacent to Rice Creek. To date appropriate � resolutions and correspondence from the City of Fridley to the agencies and municipalities involved has helped to inform them of potential problems and to further cooperate with them in an attempt to eliminate the problems. � . � Through a program of municipal sanitary sewer construction, Fridley has continued�to eliminate the private sanitary sewer system (the cesspool) as a source of contamination. � � � , � � � r � � , L� Preservation of Rice Creek and Locke Lake CONTROL OF SILTATION AND EROSIUN Page Two • i Development along and adjacent to Rice Creek and Locke Lake has b een another � concern of the City of Fridley. Review of all plans by the City Administration, wi.th subsequent referral to the various City boards, commissions, committees, and Council, has resulted in the proper input to each development to obtain its impact on the water body. City Ordinance No. 465 has been passed which dictates certain requirements which must be satisfied regarding creek alignment and slope alteration.. City Ordinance No. 555 designates a Creek and River Preservation btanagement District �lii:h certain regulations which must be followed in order to develop certain properties. �In order to prevent future development along the water body, the City of Fridley through the years has purchased, ar, in conjunction with a proposed development, has acquired through negotiations land adjacen�C to Rice Creek for park purposes. Any crossing of the water body provides a potential siltation and b ank erosion problem. Fridley has informed the Minnesota Highway Department, Anoka County Highway Department, Burlington Nortllern and the various utility companies when a problem has been observed. Through correspondence and subsequent meetings appro- priate methods have been implemented to provide proper slope protection to eliminate the siltation and b ank erosion problem. Al1 new construction plans are reviewed by the City .Administ�^ation in order to ensure protection of the water body to avoid a future problem. � �Vith the continuous growth and development of Fridley, the system is a potential hazard to Rice Creek and Locke Lake. 'I'he program within the City has eliminated dirt streets and reduced problem which can develop through sand and dirt washing into the ' continuing and expanding street sweeping progxam has also helped tential siltation problem. � � � � i � � ' � City's storm sewer street improvement the siltation storm sewers. A to reduce the po- Constant inspection of the storm sewers by the City maintenance cxew� with the continual cooperation of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,has led to detection and elimination of illegal washing of pollutants into the starm sewer system. Items in the City Newsletter emphasize that all residents be aware of the function of the storm sewer system and refrain from tvashing any pollutants into the sewers which would contaminate Rice Cree�C and Locke Lake. blaintenanee programs to seal damaged se�aer lines and reconstruct storm sewer outfalls into the water body have been initiated to reduce the siltation and bank erosion prob.lems. Fresent and future design practices for additions to the storm sewer system adjacent to Rice Creek and Locke Lake emphasize the use of ponding areas within the system which further helps reduce the siltation problem. GENERAL CLEANUP Genexal littering of the creek has become an increasing nuisance and hazard to the creek and lake. Fridley h as responded by offering to work with the Rice Creek � Preservation of Rice Creek and Locke Lake Page Three 1 Watershed District in an attempt.to annually cleanup the water body. During the ' summer of 1973, Fridley used an Anoka County work program to provide the person- nel required to clean-the creek and lake. � � � , , � i � ESTABLISI-I�1ENT OF RICE CREEK iVATERSHED DISTRICT Through all of the above concerns, there was one overriding factor which seemed to hamper a genuine effort by all communities affected toward ihe preser- vation af Rice Creek and Locke Lake. The fact that Rice Creek flows through many different municipalities and jurisdictions has resulted in a problem of authority. It has been very difficult for these agencies to collectively join forces to pro- vide a joint, cooperative effort toward preservation of the creek. In order to provide this unity, the City of Fridley has directed n�erous �orrespondence and resolutions, and has been represented at meetings towards the establishment of the Rice Creek tiVatershed District (RCt'JD) . After many years, the RCiVD was established in 1972 with certain rules and regulations directed towards the preservation of Rice Creek and Locke Lake. The RCiVD is now the authorized representative respon- sible for Rice Creek. All plans for development and construction affecting the creek, must be reviewed by the RCtiVD with appropriate permits issued. The City of Fridley improvement projects affecting the creek are also reviewed.and subject to permit. tiVith the establishment of the RCIyD, the municipalities and jurisdictions adjacent to Rice Creek now have a common agency to direct requests, suggestions, plans, etc, regarding preservation of the creek. The RC19D is the authority that can coordinate studies to further investigate the problems, determine recommenda- tions to solve the problems and provide funding to eliminate the problems. SUMMARY . . From the previous discussion, it is evident that the City of Fridley has � shown cancern and taken positive action regarding the preservation of Rice Creek. However, the ultimate authority to coordinate efforts for preservation of the creek is now the RCiti'D. The RCi'1D is the responsible agent to review any construc- tion and development within the watershed district; to prepare studies to determine 1 existing and potential problems; to provide recommendations regarding elimination of the problems; to prepare reports and applications required for funding of projects an d to work with local communities to solve specific problems. The City 1 of Fridley cannot act alone to preserve the creek, but must cooperate with other communities along the creek to provide the proper input to support the efforts of the RCWD. � � � � ' At the Council Meeting of January 21, 1974 the City Co�ncil passed Resolution No. 17-1974 requesting RC1VD to make studies and improvements regarding Rice Creek and Locke Lake. This type of input to the RC�UD must continue in order to inform the Watershed District of affected communities concerns. RECOb'AIENDATIONS With.the responsibility for preservation of Rice Creek vested in the authority of the RC1VD, the Engineering Department recommends the following course of action . for the City of Fridley to continue its positive position in regards to Rice Creek: � ' - . Preservation of Rice Creek and Locke Lake 0 Page Four 1, Work with other affected communities in support of the RC4+ID. 2. Cooperate with the RC{VD in adhering to the 6Vatershed District's Rul.es and Regulations. 3. Correspond to RCWD in form of requests, suggestions, resolutions, etc, regarding specific problems observed along the creek. 4. Cooperate with Dlinnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minne- sota Public Health Depaxtment to continue the maintenance program regarding inspection fox sources of contamination and their elimination. . 5.� Continue street sweeping, storm sewer pipe repair and storm sewer outfall reconstruction. 6. Proceed with street improvements and sanitary sewer construction to eliminate potential sources of creek contamination. RNS/p] «; . ������� d� � RICHARD N. SOBIECH Assistant Engineer � � � I�MO T0: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager MEMO FROM: Ricl:ard N. Sobiech, Assistant Engineer DATE: March 28, 1974 ' � SUBJECT: Status of Request to Rice Creek Watershed District from City of Fridley Regarding Studies and Improve- ments of Rice Creek and Locke Lake At the Council Meeting of January 21, 1974, the City Council passed Resolution No. 17-1974 requesting the Rice Creek i9atershed District (RCtVD) to make studies and improvements regarding Rice Creek and Locke Lake, In response to t�e City o£ Fridley�s request, the RCtiVD instruc�ed their consultant, Eugene A. Hickok and . Associates, to present a proposal regarding the studies and im- provements. Attached for your information, please find the proposal , presented to the RC{yD. It appears that the RCWD is taking positive steps regarding the preservation of Rice Creek and Locke Lake.. RC1VD meeiings in the near future should more clearly indicate the extent to which the RC}VD �aill proceed regarding the consultants , proposal. iVill keep you informed as further developments occur. ��— � ��� . � _��/ ..r , Richard N. Sobiech RNS/pl Attach. � �::�:.--=• .. . . � � � t�`�� � �' � � ��, f,: �'` ��� •�� � I�9arc}i � :a , _ G, 1974 545 Indian Mo�ind Wayzata, Minnesola 55391 (612) 473-�}224 htr. {Vilbur Goyer, President Board of l�tanagers Rice C�eek tiVatershed District: 7.145 Nta}itomedi Avenue Aiahtomedi, b�innesota 55110 � �. � `��'y,: 8 E � .+ �, � . � Re: Fridley Resolution No, i.7-1974 Rice Creek and Locke Lak� Studies and Impr.�vemeiYts Dear hfr. Goyer: This proposa.l is suhmitted in response to the ref:erenced resolution xequESting the Ri.ce Cxeek �daiexshed Distr.ict io prepare engineering studi�s fia contro7. pal].uti�n, erosion and seclimentation with�n P.ice Creek and Lacke Lake in Fridley. The stucl�.es are t� include �� proposal ior remaving the silt and sedirrienta�ion in t�-ic: pxoblem areas of Rice Creek in Fridley, especially the eas� end of Locke Lalce . . It is proposed that these studies be performed in phases ; � thxce Phase I tivill incJ.ude preparation of a detailed inven��ry o-�ero5ion and sedimentatian problem areas and hydrologic stxuctures, evaluation of the banks ancl stxuctures, detai�ed map�ing, �nvesti.gat.�on o� Locke �Lake, definition of corrective measures and pxeliminary �ost est.i.mates. Phase T�,�ou1d be concluded i�Tzth guhlic i.nforma�t:i.on meet•- ings and ciiscussions to obta�n �.acal gavexnmerl� and citizen input. � I?hase XI would then be per£arnled to refine t}ie corrective measuz•cs, cletermirie antic�_pated costs for assessment purposcs anci concl.ucle �a:i.th a,�ut�lic heari.n�. by Phase Iil encompasses the final design and con>truction oi tTic corrective measures 1CL�I1t1i::Lf:CI lIl tli� earl�.ei• �)}laSE:5. This pro��osal is for the Phase I study o:C Rice Creek in the Ci.ty o£ Friclley. !1 severe erosi.on prob]_em i.s apparent on I:i.cc Creek bettiti�een I.on�; I.ri�.e tincl the rlississiPp�. �Zivcr. The creck fzlls appi•oximately 40 feet bettiaeen �hese paiii�s. Before tlie: �i��parent ��roblem in Lockc Lake can be permanently correctecl, tl►e upstream eros�.on prob- lem musL- bc salvecl. . . . /'^.f . .. . 1 t; S r � � I � � ' ' ■ , . ' , , . ;I•i . . � . . il�.�--. r�ir. �Vilbur Goyer I�farcli 6.; 1974 Pagc T��o The objectives of Phase I are to identi�y the present xate ancl causes of erosion and sedimentation in this reach of Rice Creek and to identify corrective measures and methocis for their implementation. The work elements to achieve these objectives include: A. B. Inventory a11 structures and tributaxies below the outlet of Long Lake, and assess the erosional'impact of each. Locate and examine all natur�.l and unnatural bank cu*tings establish the causes and determzne i`f they can be eliminated or reducedo C. Establish the t�ank stability index, based upon geo�.- ogy, soils, slope and gxound water conditions. Use this index �o e�laluate present problems and zdentify solutions, D. Determine the feasibility and methods ot x•est-oring the natural contaurs of the waterwa.ys. E, Prepare�a detailed map showing all existing and potential problems. F. Perform soundings on Locke Lake and pxepare a map of the lake bottom. � G. Define and recommend correc�ive measures to be �aken, including priority based on cost effectiveness. H. Prepare a report including preliminary cost estimates and suitab7.e maps and draiaings. Fhase'I would concludP ���ith �ne or more public information meetin�s to explain and discuss the proposed corrective measures and to obtain 7.oca1 input. ' Thrc�ughout the studies, the work tiJill be cl.osely �oordinated with other concerned governmental units. . � The City of Fridley`is compiling all pertinent documentary information concerning the areas adjacent to the Creek and tlie cxossin�s. It is anticip�tect that the New I3righton staff wi11 also provicle copies of their recorcls. The estimated fee for the.profession�:1 engineering services � to .perform I'liase I is $11,800.00. It is pxo��osed that tl�e work would be billecl based on actual time spent on rir. {Jiltiur Goyer bfarch G, 1974 Page T}�ree the project and the fee of $11r800.00 would�not be exceeded tiaithout prior authorization. I trust this proposal is satisfactory �vith you and I am available to discuss it iaith you, the I3oard o£ I�ianagers or the City of Fridley in more cletail as requi_red. Respectfully submit�ed, EUGENE A. HICKOK �, ASSOCIATES � // G � �� '- � , � � �s....w�......._' . . 43�0" hn R. hSacLennans P.E. Vice President . JRM/pah B � , G � - � _ . • � 9 1 . 1 � ' RECEIVING REPORT REGARDING IMPROVING RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL ' � LIQUOR STORE OPERATIONS . � . . . � ' A xeport outlining some of the recommendations regarding the above mentioned sub�ect is in your ' Agenda folder. , . � .' , ' 1 � � � ' . , I � ' � � ' OFFICE OF TE� CITY MANAGER FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA March 29, 1974 ' MENIO T0: THE H RABLE 1� I ONO 1AYOR AND C TY COUNCIL ' SUBJECT: REPORT RECu'�RDING INIPROVING RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN 'I'f� b�l[JNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE OPERATIONS � L1 � ' , , L _J , � ' ' ' ' , This report is a follow up on the previous reports made by me dated March 8, 19�4 and March 15, 1974 to you gentlemen. ° To get the picture of the lic{uor operations for the last six years, see Attachment "C". On this attachment we have shown the total sales, on-sale profits, off-sale profits, net worth, o return on investment, and the monies transferred from the liquor store operation to the general fund to help lower the need for the general ta�c levy. It is obvious from the report tha.t the City was getting a substantially good return on their investment in the years when they were in the combinecl on-sale and off-sale lic�uor business. It shows the return of mini- mum 32.6a in 1968 to maximum 36.2% in 19b9. In 1972 when'the City went out of the on-sale business, the return right away came'down to 16.9a, which is almost half what we were getting.in the previous years. Also, on Attachment "C" under the column "On-Sale Profit", it shows that the City made a yearly profit in the neighghborhood of $70,000 in the on-sale business; whereas, the return the City is now getting from the licenses and additional taxes due to increased tax evaluation is in the neighborhood of �20,Q00, as per Attachment "D". It might be advisable for the City to look into the possibility of raising the fee for the liquor licenses. You will also note under the "Net �Yorth" column that, even though the City is out of the on-sale business, our net worth ha.s remained pretty consistent in the neighborhoad of $600,000. The reason is that we sold two on- sale buildings and instead built,a single aff-sale building in the arr►ount of about $190,000 at 63rd and T.H. #65. The additional reasons for loss of profit in 1973 are as follows: 1. The liquor business started feeling the full impact af repeal of the fair trade law. � • 2. We had a liauor store in the Skywood Mall Shopping Center which was.a consistent loser in that year. . 3. There were some additional costs to start the business at Li�uor Store #3 (63rd and T.H. #65). 4. In the last auarter of 1973, the Camden Bridge was closed, which sharply reduced the income.potential of Liauor Store #2, and it started showing a loss on the operations of the lic{uor store. ' ' TNE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL -2- MARCH 29, 1974 ' ^ 5. The general economy of the Country is soft and that always has some effect on the sales picture. � ' � , ' � � i , ' � J ' ' � � u To improve the return on the anvestment in the liauor business, we are pro- posing to take the following additional steps: l. The closing of LiQuor Store #2 certainly would reduce the loss on the operation all the way from about $2,500 per month to the neighl�orhood of $S00 per month right away. We propose to further negotiate with the leasors to see tivhat possible arrangement can be made to get out of the lease. Also, we are looking into ways � of subleasing the pr�perty, and we already have liad some contacts on that. tVe will work with the leasor to come up with an ec�uit- able proposal to the City and the leasor. 2. We propose to use the storage room in Lic�uor Store #3 for the basic needs of that store, and only store the items of high turn- over on which we can get some special break in the warehouse in the City Hall, and this warehouse would basically be used for storage for the Holly Shopping Center store. This wa.y we would eliminate some of the double handling of the merchandise. 3. Let the clerks at the store do some of the coding and pricing work presently being done by the accounting girl�in the City Hall. 4. llo the physical inventory once a year and spot check inventory every month, as we have better control with the new computer control of the inventory. Also, with the computer analysis, we should be able to buy the material which moves the best, and eliminate any of the items whicll are not good sellers. This way, we should be able to eliminate excessive storage needs, and the need for tying up some of the investment, and hopefully, making more profit on the items which are c{uick mavers. . 5. Eliminate some permanent help, which would lower the high cost of permanent help in the actual hourly wage, plus additional fringe benefits the City has to pay, alorig with lowering the Manager's and Assistant Manager's salaries (See the offer made by Bob TlcGuire and John�IIreha for cuts in their salaries as per Attachment "E"). Along witli the cut in salary, the Manager would be doing work, at least three days a week, as a clerk in addition to filling in for sick leave or vacation for the permanent employees, along with responsibilities outlined in Attachment "F". John Hreha, the Assistant Manager, is going to be retirement age in January of next year, and once he retires, we will review his position at that time and probaUly elvninate it. ,' . . 1 THE HONORABLE MAYOR �1ND CITY COUNCIL -3- MARCH 29, 1974 , 6. By improving_service to the clients, we hope to improve the sales and, potentially, the profits. The steps we propose to take are as follows: ' � ' ' C , a. Utilize the existing help to the best advantage by requiring them to carry out and do other work while they are r.ot busy at the cash registers. � b. Make sure clerks have a friendly greeting for customers when they come into the store. c. Rec�uire clerks to help the clients as much as they can on the floor for better service. � d. Impress upon clerks that they should thank the customers and be sure to invite them to come again. e. Hire carry out boys when there is a definite need during the peak business hours. f. Have weekly specials on certain items. Taking all these things into consideration, along with the assumptions made ' on Attacl�nent "A", we axe making projections for the next 12 months of the year, from Apri.l l, 1974 to March 31, 1974 (See AttacYmlent "B") and the last colwnn of Attachment "C". This shows that, taking all these steps, we hope to have 1 12.50 or better return on the City's investment in the liquor store operation in the next 12 month period. ' � , ' � ' NMQ/ms � Q`d�.cc;� !u ' . NASIM M. QURESHI CITY MANAGER �1�'�1�1��� � s . Concur ed with y�1-rvin C. Brunseil, Finance Director .��fl'�- � Concurred with by Robert McGuire, Liquor Store Manager �J ' � , � � � L�' C� � , ATTACl�9 E NT A PROJECTION OF SALES AND PROFITS AT STORES NOS. 3 AND 4 FOR TNE NEXT TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD Attached is a proj�ction of the sales and profits of Store No. 3 on High- way No. b5 and Store Noo 4 at Holty C�nter for the next twetve-mont� perind. It is somewhat difficult to make a projection as there are so many opinions or options as to what should be done, that it is difficutt to say what will be done. The projection is made on the assumption that a total af b,g68 hours of sales clerks' time wiit be utilized at Store No. 3, and a total of 6,552 t�ours of sales cierks� time wi11 be utili:.ed at Store No. 4. The p:ojection atso assumes that 1,092 hours of the liquor store manager�s satary wiit be spent managi ng, and tt�e bat arece of hi s ti me wi 11 be spQnt pui 1 i nq reg��i ar sates shifts at the liquor storeso These hours are included in the haurs previously listed. To put the cost estimate in perspective, it should be pointed out that the estimate is based on the assumpiion the gross prafit percentage wilt be twenty-three and on�-half per cent. A one per cent difference in gross profit pe�centag� would ma�e a difference of $9,500.00 in the profit m�rgin, one way or the other. This points up the necessity of carefully managing the inventory and the buying of inventory. The other targ�, variabte item is sales clerks� time. Based o� the expe- rience of tho first threz months of 1974, it will be difficu�t to hoid the sates clesks' hours to those set forth in this projection, although it is not impossibte to do so. Any additional hclp that wouid bs added in eny area such as carry-out b4ys �auld have t4 be �ccampani.ed by a reductio� in some other ar�a, or it �aoutd affect th� net profit, The projection is based on fihe as�cunption that t�e tiquor store mar�ag4�'s satary would be reduced from $16,200.00 p�r year to $i4,200.00 per y�ar, � and that tise assistant manaqer�s s�iary would be reduced from $11,2$7.00 per year to �9,287000 p�s yearo . , ' ' , � . ' , Under this prujection, it is assumed th� liquor store manager would do the buying and other m�nag�ment-typ� tiaoric durin� the time he was not putt- ing a shift. If the purchasing agent did the buying, h� wnuid have to charge the tim� he woutd spend on this ta the Liquor Fund, or the General Fund wouid be subsidizing the°liquor op�rationo However, this should fres up more of the liquor stvre manager's time for selting. ATTACHMENT B TtJELVE MONTH BUDGET RECAP BEGINNING APRIL l, 1974 (EXCLUSIVE OF STORE N0. 2) STORE N0. 3 STORE N0. 4 Estimated Sales $ 440,000 $ 495,000 Other Income 10,000 3,.500 Total Revenue $ 450,000 $ 498,500 Cost of �Sales ' � Expenses: Salaries, h1anagerial Other Selling Salaries Other Expenses Total Cost of Sales and Expenses $ 344.,250 $ 5,202 32,170 30,515 $ 412,137 Estimated Net for Next Twelve Month Period $ 37,863 $ 378,675 $ 5,202 28,856 29,541 $ 442,274 $ 56,226 If Store No. 2 is discounted for balance of 1974, a potential profit of 15% could be realized for the twelve month's beginning April l, 1974 if the present sales trend continues, and nothing unforseen happens. This is a somewhat optimistic projection. � 0 ATTACHMENT C CITY OF FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES SIX YEAR HISTORY OF EARNINGS & RETURNS ON INVESTMENT "SALES ON SAL� OFF SALE PROFIT PROFIT I;372,955.23 61,875.88 129,962.34 1,464,232.64 73,739.49 157,384.31 1,534,762.84 79,272,60 142,305.16 1,450,359.13 *102,394,36 112,039.78 1,069 ,471.17 -- 101,827 .26 1,067,329.76 -- 52,109.58 NET WORTH �2/31 587,87]. .03 640,524.74 646,293.56 635,7Z7.70 601,054 .96 631,384.54 ** 935,847.00 *�'� 79;000.00 630,000.00 RETURN ON INVESTMENT 32.6 % 36.2 34.3 33.7 16.9 8.3 12.5 TRANSFERS TO GENERAL FUND 160,000.00 180,000.00 216,000.00 225,000.00 136,5Q0.00 � 75,000.00 We are estimating a 7oss of $15,840.00 at Stnre #2 for 1974. 7his estimate is based on the following: , A. $7500 first quarter loss on operation. � B. $4500 loss on lease for 9 months of 1974. C. $3840 provision for other losses at Store #2. _ * Includes $66,847.61 Gain on Fixed Assets ** Estimated for 1974 *** $79,000 estimate includes the loss of $15,840 at Store #2 for 1974 ' . . . N � z O F-- � �C � � W CL ; O :• �} d ' �� �� W � F-- �� �€ ��d f.._ Ey J w; � 0 � Q i i"_ 4 �± ¢ i O 1 F- � Q �I �, J �, z � w � ¢ w c� U Z W s N- N 3 O � N CS z �-, � O ..J J O LL W Z F�- 0 z � 1 O � � t ) � 1 Z 1 � I � � c� N W � W 1 � I Z 1 Q N 1 1 ' 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 � 1 '. 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 O 1 • 1 O I O 1 � 1 ^ c1' e�- � �—a � � a� > o0 a� �r � �,�h +� � r•r0 rCS CJ N � � 00 O O O O L!') d' � O � O i O I I O � p � 1 O O 1 1 � I_{) ; 1 � : 'Cr' Gi ; � �� i IW —I � � �� � o 0 0 � o Ol 00 O ; 00 ►-y O N� l0 � N O ' N O Ln c0 dl O � dl W d' d' � O � � � �C l0 d' 1� r d- j � O 01 00 � I W � � C'3 t�} I i O O O � O I� O O O O O r M l l0 O l0 O O 01 t� �.(� C7 � 3 t� i� Ln M � CO LL� M Gt' Ol r� d" • Lf) o �- o � � N � N � �' N ( N (CS ' i�. � � V � H RS N QJ N "� %C � N N V1 � rt1 C rtf X r� rCS t� F^ +-> V�1 U ~ U � �--� U V! N� Ri VI i r-' C C � C•r � � H fO H %� H Q} � U r !n +� i-� t� U > Q I— � U ....t J ! * ATTACHMENT D 0 v� -�-� rn +� -a rtS •r- U1 U1 C •r- O 3 N � •r- S- +-� T7 +> -N (C r r O � � � � > -vo Rs � v�i � � >, s.. v o -o a� .n �+� a� � c+� �+� s. 2s s- QT3 •r � N N d-� Q^> N i. ev i-� S. �•rl N� N"C3 O S�. � O rt3 O S- .c N'� S- "C3 � E+� U1 ��--� C tCt Q N O •r �F •r 'r � T3 �� 4- d-� N� N � N •r s � �1-� •r •r � O .� I— S- 'C3 a--� "t7 r--i "C3 4- .p �+� � � N N N � N�1-� tn O X� t � � � ^ � c� +-� +� •r� N N� +-3 O U U N � N fn �•r �i-� Q1 � f6 i • m�•r r� S-•r� O N �.� cn rt5 O +� 4-- N rt5 S- i- �F�- � N � � N O �QJ �S-.r � U � � � i � �J rt3 •r r-- RS � N N. r� S� N O rtS � •r rt1 � � +-� N � Z> r 3+-� U O�� � � r 'C3 • c� � d' t� rtS N I� � � N � r- �- .� � f� +.� .� > c -F-� •r S- � .� N O O +-� � � � N '6 c!� ..Q N r tn +� N -I-> U Vf X i1 N•r � � r � -1--� X O ~ a1 N U � � s�-�a-cs � � � � 3 � x a� � � � rn a� +� Rs � •r •r �--� O 3 r- i- �. O N N � 'C3 O 4) N � S- S- N N n. o x � 4- t6 tlJ N -�--� �- v� 5-. N N N r i-� � .� r �F- ���� rn C •U � -F-� •r O t/1 r- •r O O +-� U 4- C].. rt3 O �- � a -1-� N i-� +-� C •r •r � � S.0 �•r > N U "O O .� i ¢ C, -f� O � � O O � � F-- +-� W rtS � ' Attachment "E" i�1arch 29, 1974 � � � � ' � ' ' � :�1 MEMO T0: MEMO FROM: SUBJECT: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER BOB MCGUIRE, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER JOHN HREHA, ASSISTANT LIQUOR STORE MANAGER CONCERN ABOUT LOW PROFITS AT LIQUOR STORES AND OFFER OF ACCEPTING A LOWER SALARY � We know that you and the City Council are concerned about the low profits in the City's l�quor stores operation. We appreciate your concern, and taking that into consideration, a7ong with the consolidation and reduction of the number of liquor stores from four to two, which has lowered the responsibilities for us, w�: are offering to accept a cut in the amount of $2;000 each in our yearly �alaries for the remaining nine months of this year, starting April 1, 1974. � This offer is made with the understanding that when the profit of the liquor store business improves, we wiii be given special consideration for higher salaries in the future. ' � � � � ' ' ' - ' � , ��� � �.�, Bo McGu�re, Liquor Store Manager ' '� � . � Jo Hreha, Assistant Liquor Store Manager •� �' ' � . I ' . � �� C � � �J ' � ' ' � � � ' ATTACI�IENT "F" DUTIES OF THE MANEIGER l. Checks ou� cash daily - banking, getting change, etc. 2. Makes daily sales reports. 3. Purchases all supplies. 4. Prices all items. 5. Schedules all employees. � 6. Coordinates between stores (employees etc.). 7. Prepares advertisemenis. 8. Manages all special sales. 9. Handles bad checks in court (signs complaints, etc.). 10. Answers alarms after hours. � 11. participates in union negotiations. 12. Handles employee griviances. 13. Reports to City Manager. 14. Arranges store dis�lays (window signs, etc.). 15. jti'orks with bookkeeping on our computer system. , . ].6. Checks time cards. 17. Substitutes as clerk when necessary due to employee leaves. 18. .Arranges the crew> for inventory. 19. Maintains ec{uipment in stores. 2Q. Works as clerk three days a week. 21. Transfers stock from warehouse to stores. - , �1 � ' OFrICE OF TE-IE CITY MANAGER FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA March 29, 1974 � MQ�10 T0: TE� HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER � ISUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FUNDING FOR NUCLEUS CLINIC - NORTH SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE CENTER ' . A report regarding the background material on this subject is in your agenda folder. It is obvious that some of the c{uestions that the City raised previously have not been fu11y answered. The previous report written to the City. Council from the City staff dated January 3, 1974, indicated that the County had not taken any formal action on the study pxepared by the Anoka County Comphrehensive Health Department. To date, also, there has been no formal action by the Anoka County Board of Cormnissioners . It seems the Nucleus Clinic is running into some serious funding problems, and if the City Council feels it is a worthwhile endeavor,�taking into consideratian the informatiori that has been given to you to date, maybe it is the time now �or the City to provide support in the amount of $1,000 as had been discussed earlier. 1�IQ f ms . � � � 10 � 1 MIl�IO T0: � FROM: SUBJECT: � � � �� ' ' � � � � � �J � ' ' LI � March 29, 1974 CITY MEWAGER ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTAN'T NORTH SUBURBAIV YOUTH SFI2VICE CENTER As per your reauest, I have reviewed the situation of the North Suburban Youth Service Center, and have_accumulated the following information for your review: 1. A report ma.de by our Assistant City Manager/Public Safety Director that was submitted to the Council on July 12, 1973. 2. A copy of the Council meeting muiutes of August I3, 1973 showing Council action in regard to this Youfih Center and requesting Anoka. County Health Board to examine the Cente�° and submif findings and recommendations to the �ridley City Council. 3. An excerpt from the 1974 budget me�sage made by the Gity Manager with a note to the City Council portion where $1,000 has been pxovided for any warthy praject in th� City or Anoka County. . This is prov�.ded in the Cit� Coun�i�. budget under �'consultant fees". 4. A copy of the Council meeting minutes of January 7, 1974 referring �Co the receipt of the Anoka County r.eport cQncerning the North Suburban Youth Service Center. 5. The Anoka County Comprehensive Health Aepartment sLmunary by the Planning Assistarlt. _ 6. Updated background material on the North Suburban Youth Center which I have recently received from the Directar of Youth Services, Mr. Joel Koemptgen. 7. A letter dated March 26, 1974 which I recently received from the City Manager of the City of Caon Ra�ids, Mr. John Cottingham. Quite a bit of information has been received cancerning this yauth center in the past year. Mr. Cottingham's letter pretty much sums up the recent activities of the center and. poses two separate questions to the City cf Fridley: 1• An i�nediate need of funds to help finance the project in the Nucleus Center. As noted in the background data supplied_by Mr. hoemptgen, the Youth Center is having diff_iculty in obtaining physicians for providing services to the Nucleus Cen�er. Due to this, a small fee was to be used to �ffset some of the cost of � , I, �i I�IO TO CITY MANAGER MARCEI 29, 1974 PAGE 2 obtaining a physician to be in attendance. Due to this cost, � a deficit has occured in this area. This, right now, is the primary need of the Narth Suburban Youth Service Center, and is the first question the Council should direct itself to. ' 2. In Mr. Cottingham's letter of Ma.rch 26, 1974, he is noting that the operation of the youth center will need a larger part of participation from either the County or Municipalities in , the area to make the services of this youth center available to alI the yazuig people in neecl of help in Anoka Cotu�ty. II � ' � � � � ' � C� � ' u The conclusion I have drawn fram his letter is that, unless additional funds are provided. by the cor�m►unities of those wishing help, services will be denied those who do not live in the City of Coon Ra.pids, unless funds are forthcoming irom the respective communities. At present Anoka County is preparing another evaluation for submission to their County Board in making a determina.tion whether the County will participa.te in the cost for the remainder of 1974. I am sure along with this will be same determination for funding for 1975. The report �n �estion will probably not be available at least for a couple of months. - RECON�IENDATIONS Niy recammendations are: 1. That if the Council decides there is a urnnediate need for the North Suburban Youth Service Center, the Council �hould consider a donation, not in excess of $l,(�00. 2. Further detexmination on funding of the youth center for 1975 should be considered more seriously in the 1975 budget, and probably can wait until an action by Anoka County has been taken. Further action by the City Council in recoirnnending that Anoka County take over a greater portion of this Frojecfi would be in order. N1y personal feeling on this project is that it is worthwhile and the services that are being provided, as noted in the attached report, do sho�r that if the service was denied Fridley residents, it would be a very serious void. PJ�i/ms Attachments - 7 � � - . 1 l� S T A F F S T U D Y TO . THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE . JULY 12, 1973 SUBJECT: NORTH SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE CENTER PROBLEM: Should the City of Fridley participate in financial support of this activity? ASSUMPTIONS: This activity serves as a useful function to the northern suburban citizens including those of the City of Fridley. .FACTS BEARING ON THE PROBLEM: I. As indicated in its Federal Grant application, this is a private, non- profit organization. It does, however, receive financial aid from the City of Coon Rapids in whose jurisdiction this agency is located. 2. The City of Coon Rapids is the sponsoring unit of government for a Law Enforcement Administration Grant through the State of Minnesota, under which this agency operates. All Law Enforcement Assistance Administra- tion Grants must have a governmental unit sponsorship. Mr. Joel Koemptgen, a full time employee with the City of Coon Rapids, serves as Project Director for the Federal Government Grant. 3. On July 2, 1473 the State of Minnesota Governor's Commission on Crime Prevention and Control, awarded a Continuation Grant in the amount of $21,800 to the North Suburban Youth Service Center. Mr. Koemptgen ad- vised that the grant money coupled with Coon Rapids monies in approxi- mately� $6,000 under the present operation budget. • 4. During.the past month a member of the Knights of Columbus advised the Acting City Manager that he was proposing a Youth Center concept to the Knights of Columbus Board of Directors to be located within the City of Fridley. This is only'"in the planning stage at this time. 5. Mr. Koemptgen.states that if Fridley provides financial support for the North Suburban Youth Service Center, there is a good possibility that a representative from Fridley would be appointed to a position on the Management Board. 6. At its June, 1973 meeting, the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council heard a presentation by Mr. Don Wegscheider of the Youth Center, similar to the presentation made at the Fridley City Council. The Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council took no action on this presentation and it was considered for informational purposes only. � � � � � � �J �� MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL l A PAGE 2 ' JULY 12, 1973 7. Off icials of the Fridley High School; Anoka Court Services; Anoka County Administration Office; Anoka County Attorney's Office; Coon Rapids Police Department; Blaine Police Department; Columbia Heights Police Department; and a Fridle� High School counselor were interviewed regarding their opinion of the Youth Center. 8. The North Suburban Youth Service Center serves primarily Anoka County due to its physical location. However, in its presentation made to the Fridley City Council, Youth Center representatives provided statistics and indicated they also serve residents of Hennepin County and Ramsey County. The 10 percent estimate of services to Fridley would appear to be quite difficult to justify at this time. , DISCUSSION: ' fJ � � � � � � � i It appears from the above facts, that the North Suburban Youth Service Center will be able to operate at, or slightly below, the level of the proceeding year with the approval of the Coritinuation Federal Grant: Mr. Koemptgen stated however, the Center will experience some financial difficulties in the final third of 1974 without additional monies of at least $6,000. Attempting to acquire sound opinions from individuals who represent agencies in section "7" of f acts above, prove to be a very frustrating ordeal. It appears from the opinions of the majority of individuals interviewed, that this agency has a place in the community and accomplishes much more good than evil. Almost without exception, individuals who were interviewed did not wish to be quoted. I attribute this to the fact that many well-meaning and hi�hiy respected citizens openly support or do voluntary work for this agency. One of the major concerns that was expressed is that certain policies and procedures of the agency are highly controversial and cuts directly across some very basic philisophical differences of opinion of our citizens. For example, the agency will treat and give advice to juveniles in such areas as drugs, venerial disease, and contreceptives without the knowledge of the juvenile's parents. One Fridley school official felt this type of policy and operation usurps the family unit. �One school non-administrator, who works very closely with the center, indi- cated�that he agreed with the theory of the Center. He felt, however, that parents and children should have a rapport such that an organization such as the center should not be necessary and in addition, he would look unfavorably upon his child- ren utilizing the Center. In addition to the controversial policies at the Center, the second major concern of those interviewed was that of organizational structure. It.is the opinion of many of those interviewed, primarily at the Anoka County level, that the organizational structure for the Center is somewhat hazy. It is recognized that Joel Koemptgen is the initial Project Director for the Federal Grant and is also a full time employee for the City of Coon Rapids. It would then appear that because of fiscal control, Joel Koemptgen and the City of Coon Rapids has control over this agency as long as the Federal Grant continues, or if the City of Coon Rapids assumed direct control of�this �gency as a portion of their governmental , . , " , MEMO T0: . PAGE 3 JULY 12, � � I,' � � � , � � � r � � . � � MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 1973 unit should a Federal Grant expire. Beyond this point, the st�ucture with respect to the chain of command; unity of command, and span of control, becomes very difficult to identify. It is this problem that appears to trouble certain County officials. For example, Anoka County utilized the Center as one of several resources in which they refer individuals for various reasons. Referrals are usually not made until. a case study on the individual is made and it is determined that the Center is the best location £or this particular individual. Beyond this point, as one County official stated, control is lost. There appears to be some apprehensiveness about the qualifications and approaches taken by certain staff members of the Center. For this reason those who expressed their concern would like to see a well-defined organi.zational structure within the Center in which County officials can be assured that individuals sent to the Center rLceive treatment from the proper staff persons. CONCLUSION: I have discussed the negative aspects of the reports I received about the Center with Mr. Koemptgen. Mr. Koemptgen indicates he fully understands and is aware of these major concerns. The problem, as both Mr. Koemptgen and I agree, returns to the very basic philisophical differences of opinion of our citizens, school officials, and governmental officials regarding the control of family affairs and formal structure versus informal structure for this organization. It appears that the North Suburban Youth Service Center will have funds to operate through 1974 although the level of service may drop for the final third of 1974 without additional funds. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. My recommendation is that the City of Fridley not render financial support for 1974 to this agency. I make this recommendation on the following: . A. The agency is basically a private, non-profit organization. Council may be setting a precedent by donating to such an organization. B. The organization appears to have funds to operate in 1974. C. The amount of funding by the City of Fridley would be difficult to computate on a fair basis. There are several. other cities and counties that ar� also receiving benefits. , D. Although the general concept of this agency is accepted, there are serious philisophical differences of opinion about the Center's operation. . E. If the Center is to receive financial support from governmental agzncies other than its sponsoring agency, it appears more reason- able that the funding should come from Anoka County or joint counties than through the numerous municipalities. �� � 1 � , i � � e MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 . JULY 12, 1973 lC 2. If Council feels that it wishes to render financial support to this organization, it is my recommendation that this action be deferred until a recommendation from the City Manager can be presented as to a cost formula for determining a fair share cost based on a formula which would take into consideration the services rendered by this agency to other cities within Anoka County as well as other counties. It may also be wise to stipulate certain safeguards for our monies when they are presented to this agency. In addition, Council may wish to chec�C the progress, if � any, of the Knights of Columbus proposal for a Youth Center in Fridley. 3. If City Council would prefer not to accept the two recommendations above and Council feels they have sufficient information regarding the Center, and �feels the Center serves a worthwhile purpose for public �unds for the citizens of Fridley, and wish to take an affirmative action at this time, I would recommend a contribution of $1,000 for 1974. In addition, it would be my recommendation that Council direct the City Manager to correspond with the County of Anoka expressing Council's opinion that funding for this ag�ncy through governmental funds in 1975 should be allocated at a County level. � , , JPH/cm � � i h• 3 Very respectfully, James P. Hill Acting City Manager 0 , PUBLIC HEARING MEETiNG OF AUGUST 13, 1973 PAGE 8 • 2 ' Caunci].man Nee said he would like to know what is lo�ked aC in determining i£ a faGility( shoul.d be iicensed. ` � The C�ty Engineer said the properties in question are listed on page 4-B of the agenda. Ha added, that a building must have proper fire extinquishers &nd door clo5ures. The CiCy Engineex said if [here are any ordinance vi.olations, the City would have to go 1 a�Cex the property owner with the ordinance, they cannot use the �icense foz an ordinance violation. � � xhe City Attorney suggested Mr. Aldrich submit a memo to the Council on what he is . looking for in recommending approval of the license. The City Attorney said �hey ahauld know if he is looking primarily for fire safety or if he a�so lo�ks �oz' adequate garbaas and trash handling and removal. He added, if tha maint�rtance of the building �.a looked at, he did not know. ' Councilman Nee said there is some outside evidence of rot on Che build'ings. �he City ' Attorn�y said this should be called to the attention of the inspecti,on department. He sugge�ted a special inspection of the property be nade. � C� � ' � � �_ � � Th� C�±ty Engineer said this type of enforrement would come under the juxisdictioa of ths �:ousing cod�.. He said the City af Fridley does not have a houaing code. 2ie said the Platining Commis�ion had talked about the e�tablishment of a housing cpde and they had ehown some inteXest in Chis and will be discus�ing the mattex within tha next couple of weeks, He said if the Citj►iiad a?�ouaing cQde, the cifiy Would havs same authority to go in and enforce this type af condition. He �aid this would rolate more to the housing code than tha building code. APPO ZNT2�N� : C ITY EMPLO i�EE : I�T.�ME I,s,�rence A. �hubb EFFECTIVE DATE August 20, 1973 SALARY $828_ REPI.AC�S Jame� M��eraie Ja�ea U. �anksb�n August 20, 1913 $828 Aa11.a$ Nelson MOTIO*1 by CQUncilman Breider to appoint �awrenc� A. Chubb and James D. Bankstoa as police offiegzs for the Fridley Police D�part�enr, Seconded by Councilman Ne�. Upon a voice vQte, all voting aye, kiayor Li�bl declaxed the motion carx�ed unanimously. RESOLUTION yi100-19y3 -"R�'QUESTING TfLAT tHE AIti0:t4 COUiTTY HEALTH BO:�RD �.Y.A.�fI�IE TiiE P�RTH SUi URii.�?i YOUTH S�ZVICES CE�+�ER A�`+'D SUBMIT ITS FII�INGS AND RECO.�i:-i :NDATIOYS TO TF?E �RID�.i CIT'1 COiJNCIL: . MOTION by Council�an Breider to adopt Resolution /t100-1973 requesting that the Anoka County �iealth Board examin� the North Suburban Youth Servicea Center and submi.t i�s findings and recommendations to tha`Fridley City Council. Secpnded by Council�an Nee. lipon a volce vote, all voting aye, Mayor I.i�bl declared tha mot�.on caXZied unanimously. ' • RESOLUTION �101-1973 - CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR SANITARY SEWERt WATERy AND STORM SEWER 'IPix�ROY^•I�;;r� PROJECT N0. 102 = MOTZO"� by Counci.lman Breider to adopt Resolution 11101-�1973� confirming asaessment �ox Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Iraprvvement �rojecC No. 1�2, and adding tha notation thaC thie is a p���isl ae��:�sment for ��qrp� sawer. Seconded by Counc�lman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared'the motion carried unanimously� , • .. ., .. . - ( , � �J � . Honorable :•fayor and City Council -3- 3 October 16, 1973 2. The sales in the liquor stores ar.e down without a significant reduction in the expenses of operating the municipal liquor stores. Tt was hoped that the consolidati_on of two off-sale liquor stores into a rodern sCOre on 63rd and T.H. l�65 4!ould increase th� competitiveness of tt�e 1'r.idley liquor operation, an:l in turn �aould increase t}ie revenues W111C�7 the City could transfer into the general operating fund in the future. � It is anticipated that tlie revenue sharii7o funds in the amount of $149,07? will be made available to tlie Ci_ty, and are i.ncorparated into the general fund to assist in financing a roajor ekpansion of di.fferent items and facilities in the City departr�ents. T'hese itea�s are spread all over the EudgeC, and a lisCing , of them can be found under "Addxtional Intors*�aL-i.on" aC the back of the Bu3geC. � � � � EXPERDTIURES ' This Bud�et provides for expenditur.es oi $2,7g?,g29, cahich i.s a$224,493 increase ove.r the 1973 expenditure level_. Fo].l.awing are the noteworChy iCems in each departmental Budget: - City Council: The amounC of $},,000 has Ueen provided under Che colu�n of "Consultant rees", so ttiis can be expended by Che City Council on any worthy project in the City or Anot;a County. .' Cit t•iana�er: $3,500 has been added to Che "Consultant I�ee" section to cover ttie cost of censul,.ino fees for labor negotiations or any other n�e,:ec! consultants.• $5,000 has Ueen provided to covcr tiie cost of safety improve�7enL-s and r�ateri.als required under the OSFi:� regulations. fioards and Cc�mr�issinns: C�.ble 1'elevisi.o�l Comriission has beczn adcied t:a the list of )3oards and C;;r:,:;;issioas and $3,500 has been provided for Lheir. operation. � It is hopec] Ch�t this cost �:�i11 be o�fset by the revenue received fr�m General Television, i.e the 5% of subscriber revenues. � C_?t�Attorney: $33,200 has been provided iti ttie le�al departm�ent to cover the cost of the present arrangenent the City has wi[h the City Attor,ney an� City Prosecutor. This is an iucrease cf aUout $8,Q00 over the amount budgeted in 1473. � Finance Dc��rtment_ The positio�is oL- seniot: ac�ountant and ,�unior accountant are recom�iended to be tip�raded te the next f;rade because ttiese peopl.e are uiiderpaid as compared tu the similar`positions in ca:r.r�uniti.es of our sizr.. The salary of the junior accountant i.s directly charged to tl�e pub].ic uti.lit:y fund, so it will. not � . affect the �enerai fund. :lnothcr area caliere thi.s clepartr•.:ant �aill be geL'tia� taore ful.ly invol.ved in Che year 1973 is data process9n�, pr�srntly thc Ci.ty is bein� uscd.,ts thc piiot City for 1.OGIS (I.oc�t�l CovrsTnm.nt In[orr.iaCic�n SysCem), �n,� tt�� cosl- is b�ii�t; boru�� hy thr [oCal L�%i;1S �l,,irtici�•:�nts. \est ycar, it" Lhe City feels � it is a w��rtl�whilc ��rc��;rain, wc �oi11 Lc, paying our fair siiare oI Ch� total program, The monies provided for this are $29,61b, which is an increase of over $4,616 of � • f. � -III- � ' • . � � � R � __ . . . � � � � , REGULAR COUYCIL MEETIP�G OF JtU�UARY 7, 1974 .PAGE 8 RECEIVI��G EVI;LUATIO�! OF NORTN SUQUR3AId YOUTH SERVICE CEFdTER REPORT BY ADlOY.A CQUt�TY HEALTtI D� PiiKTi �Ei;7:' MOTION by Councilman-areider to receive the evaluation of the report from the Anoka County Hea]th Departr^=nt regardin9 the �Jorth Suburban Youth Service Center. Seconded by Councilnan Nee. The City 1•lanager explained there tvould be a report presented to the Anoka County Comnissioner on the Center. He continued on the staff level, it is believed that the service is vrorths•rhile and when the administration problems are corrected, then the problems +��ould be alleviated. He thought the support and funding for the center should be ►•rorked out jointly tivith the County. He stated the Center is guaranteed funding until Septemb2r o€ 1974, and from that tim? on, they rrould require additional funding. 7he City iianager said he tiaould report back to the Council t��hen and if there are further reports and evaluations on the Center. Councilman Nee said he thought this was an exhaustive study, and it was very well drafted. � Mayor Liebl said there should be some decision soon Upon a v�ice vote, all voting aye, t�layor Liebl declared the motion carried undnimousl,y. RESOIUTIUP7 T 4-1974 - P.ECOi•i'4�D;DI��G THAT A P.EPP.ESEPdTATIVE FOR THE �lORTH SU6URBA� AREA REf�U1Itd Oi� 7NE (�1tTROPOLITAid SEI�!ER EOAP.D: . The City hianager said the purpose of this resolution �vas to inform the Board ihat the City would like to continue the membership of t4r. Joseph Craig as it is the feeling that there may be some shufflfng of appointments on the Board. He said it would be in order to pass the resolution stating the City of Fridley V�ishes Mr. Craig would remain on the E3oard so there is some representation from the north suburban area. Mayor Liebl said Mr, Craig uras the first representative on the Qoard from this area. The City Attorney agreed.� Mayor Lieb] said he thought �dr. Cr.aig had done a good job. ' Councilman Star�•�alt said he had attended several sessions, and he 4vas not a�rare who �. he �•:as at first. He said he �hought it ti��ould be a good idea to continue t�r. Craiy's membership as this wauld cont�nue the representation frc,m the suburban communities and make it more difficult for urban control of the facility. hi07I0t� by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution n4-1974 recommending that . Mr. Joseph Craig remain as a representative on the h�orth Suburban Area orr the P1etro- politan Sewer Board. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice, a71 vating aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLU7ICfd #5-1974 - DESIG^lATING A DIRECTOR APdD ALTERfdATE DIRECTOR TO THE SUBUREiAM . RATE AUTNORITY AND CONSIDFRATION OF APPOItdTh'EP�T OF hi�'1YOR PRO TEt•1 Ai�D OTHER CITY COUfJCII APPOINTh1ENTS TO QRGAi�ILP�TIOf�S: " ' • I•tOT10y by Councilman h'ee to reappoint both members, Councilnan Utter as Representative from the �ity of Fridley and CounciLman Starti•�alt as Alternate, to the.Ilorth Suburban Rate nUtno�;ty. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice, all voting aye, tlayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. � • MOTIOP! by Councilman Breider to appoint Councilman Utter as Mayor Pro Tem for the year 1974. Seconded by Co�mcilman Start�ralt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, �4ayor Liebl declared the n,otion carried unanim;;usly. . �i07I0'1 by Councilman P1ee to reappoint the current members, Councilman Breider, Representdtive, and Councilman Utter, Altcrnate, to the Anoka County Laa [nforcement Council. Seconded by Councilman Stai�•r��lt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, h;ayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTIOt� by Councilman �tee to reappoint Councilman Stariaalt to the Plorth Suburbar� Sewer Service Qoard as Representative fro,n the City of.Fridley. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye. ���yor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. . � � r i ; i 4 � � �_ , ' MEMO TO: Nasim Qureshi, Acting Gity Manager MEMO FROM: Jerrold Boardman, Planning Assistant 1 MEMO DATE: January 3, 1974 RE: North Suburban Youth Service 5 ' After talking to Byron Laher, Human Services Coordinator ' for the Anoka County Comprehensive Health Department, and reading their evaluation on the North Suburban Y.outh Service, they feel that this organization provides a needed service to Anoka County. Mr. Laher said it is the only organization of � its kind in Anoka County and that the service that is delivered is of high quality. � The evaluation be very favorable, communities is well � programs dealt with keeping system. of the organization's programs seemed to stating that the primary service to the run. Most of the recommendations for these increasing efficiency and a better record The main concern that was brought out in the evaluation , was that most community criticism toward the program seemed to be a result of the lack of administration. The County Health Department recommended that (1) the governing Board , be immediately brought up to at least minimum membership, (2) an adequate�administrative replacement for Mr. Koemptgen be sought, (3) Staff should recognize that the overall admin- , istration of North Suburban is an importan� . program component, (4) it should be further recognized that community public relations has been overlooked and should receive renewed emphasis, (5) accountability to funding sources and functioni.ng 14'ianagement � Board should be stressed, and (6) Management Board minutes should regularly be sent to the funding sources. L' J , � � LJ ' In order to keep tiie Organization in operation, it is necessary to seek support from the municipalities it serves. In the evaluation, it was generally agreed, that the service that is provided is for a multi-municipality area and that a broader base of funding is desirable. However, in order to achieve this broader base of funding, mo�e attention will need to be placed on administration without a loss in the very good service program. The Personal Services Committee of the Anoka County Health Department is presently reviewing the evalution and it'will be presented to the County Health Board around the third week in January. If it is decided that the program is deserving of County funding, it will proabably go before the County Commissioners in March or April. � / _ f � /� � � RROLD L. BOARDMA] Planning Assistant , JLB/de G NORTH SUBUF�BAN YOUTH SERVICE CENTER STAFF � � Joel Koempt�en Don Wegscheider John CarlstrTm Pat Breslin Patricia Rygg Nancy Hite PEACE LINE IS...,.....� telephone co�nseling service staff ed by trained volun�eers providing inf ormation or just someone to•talk to, 757-2121. open every night 8pm to ma.dnight and Sat�rday, noon-mid. NUCLEUS CLINIC IS...Counseling and medihal help.. V;d testing and treatmeat, Pregnancy testing wi.th follow-up. HOURS: l�7onday & Thursday evenings 7-9Pm. • FEES: $3�00 under 18, $5.00 nver. � For more inf o call 755-53�� J.6.B. (Job.Oppurtunity Bureau) IS.....A job referral service designed specifically f or youth 12-19.' ca�L: 755-5300 . FAMILY COUNSELING: By appointment f a11ov,�ing the model of Virginia Satir rebuilding communication patterns to enjoy living in a family. FEES: �5000 to $15.00 per sessior� at discretion ' . of family, • ELEMENTARY PEER GR OUPS : . . Wednesday evenings 6:30 to 8pm. (8 to 10 yr. old) . 8 to 9:30pm. (1Q to i2 yr oId) A place f or kids to learn communication, friendship, and how to share feelings. $5.00 TEEN PEER GROUPS : Thursday af ternoons 3 to !�: 30 .5 to 6t3D $5.00 per month A place for teens to share feelings, ideas, and goalsp. A chance to make friends with a minimum of hassle« Ca1�. 755-5340 WOMENtS GROUP: Thursday,afternoons 1:00 tfl 3pm. $2 per sess.ione A place to explore fee.lir�gs, self-image, goalr. and ways of coping�with stress� Call 755-5300. ABANDONED PARENTS PROGRAM: ��`. ���(� p m . Monday� _ m at the Center. $S.00�month. A place for parents whase kids have run away` A place ta learn how•to cope with stress:� wi�h � gullt � W�.�h angfii� a , Ca�l 755���'Q�• SCH OOLS : Drug education for al1 levels�,emphazing their effect on relationships�.. • � •ALSC�: Regular workshops on Family aommunication and relationships, � how chemiaal use can effect f amilies,. and NSYSC provides speakers to any group�. Donations asked. CALL 755-5300. � � � � NUCLEUS UPDATE I, N�lorus _came about �s the rasult of the h�rd woak prof �.�c �group called The ti7orkshop Inc. The Bonr �. was c�mposed of a number of community youth o�com�nunitg adult advisors. 6 �4 of an incorporated, rion- of Directors of the Workshop laaders and a cross section iT W orksh�p Inc identifi�d a number o£ probl8m ar�as tha� youth encounter in t Tlorth Suburban nran. Among thase prob�.ams are unemployment, drug problems, a a need for anon�mous madical tosting and treatmen� in the crisis areas o pregnancf and Voneri�al Disease. The first of th€��e problems was attackad ' d �ng the� sum.m�r of 1977-• Thv Job Opportuni�Cy Bureau (J.0.8.) was sat �pidsdand theesurroundingen��gars �e givan �oma type of ernploymant in Coon R p Tha saeond major endeavor of The Workshop Inc. was the f ormation of Nucleus. cleus f I.rs� opaned i�ts doors �o youth in November of 19710 ��- .. � i Colla e furnished space as well �s three excell�an't Ano:�a R�mse� Commun ty� � 1un�eer counselors. Coo:� R�:pids Clinie furnish�d an eYam tnbla, some �uiptment anci supplies, �s well as our firs'� ph� ici�n. e firs'� �three nights Nuc�.eus was open we saw zero, one and zero person�, s��ci.ive?�. B� J�nurary 1, 19?2 wa wexe seeing an average of 10 parsons gt1i,�.�, presentl�, we ara open on 1�londay and Thursday evenings frorn 6:30 'to 9p=� and see an a�rarage o� 30 parsons per week. � S�p�ember of 1972 Nucleus bec3me a pra�ram of the North Suburban Youth Service Can�er wh.ich was the ouicgrow�h of �tiorkshop. Z�ie are located in our w building at 1Oj03 Hanson Blvd. in Coon Rapids. . inc� opanirg c�Je havo had over 125 volunteers work nt the elinie. t�'e �:ra .. ,��:�:-��.:sc����ing for volunteers. - .� JOIN US : • ' � � ' � , � � r. .� � � Tha Nucleus S�a£f Novemb�r� 1973 � . . i . -: - _ . . :.. .. . C, Q . . r. . . . 3_ . - : � . �- ' ' . I�UCLEU� PI,ILOSOP1tY ' . �''� � eo�le of the horth ��� �:a� � prinary objective of �ucleits is to provide the youn� p � . . • 5uburb�a �i.n Citie� area �:�ith.V.11. cnu°�elin�nin�boChnMediculrand�non--redical. , nanc testin� ; fa^aiJ.y pla:.n�.nt,, and o U y Y Birt,i contro�. services �aiiJ. be av��1���-� to ���-1 areas of pezson:l conce.n. ( � �, • _� persons of cllild--beari.nt, a;e in accozdance c�a.th the �Iinne:.ota S�ate Lsw, Chap�er 544, S.F. �o. 149b. (See page 1B, at�ached.) �Reco�,ni.x�.n� that no r,:entaZ or phy��•cal liealCh caxe i:: fxee, Nucleus depends . -. � ���t�ile nb onc X� r��u��d se�vi�a upon iCS cl:i.ents and co:��ur.ity zox sUppo�'�. t , a�s encoura�ed i-n due �o econo:.zic sta�us; payra�n� 4ccordzn� to auil�t} to P Y , ' oxder that \'ucleus ��4y beco�,.c largely self :sustainiab. _ . • '�hest ethica�. Ir'uc]_cus s�rives to deliver these services zn accordance with the h:.,, '. Sr d rds in an environ.:,ent whicl� is non-�;ud�enental� and no�-thrcat_ ��1� and one in wi�icr �ood heaZi.n care i.s seen as a rigiit by everyone i:�volved. . A7.1 persons seel:ing help throuryh i�ucleus caiJ.i re�ain azon}'mous.' All infor:1a- • � ° -----r--. o:essionai st��f . . tion co�cernin^ th� person will be co:�Liae.^.�ial c•iithin ttie nr Counseling is avail.ble to ilelp young peopla in the areaz °�i1ichlleac�sdpersonsnal � adjt:st�.�ent . Counselin ; establislies a helpinb reiation,h p ,. to f�.nd s�?�a�:.o:�:s *_0 4: �ir' greble�s wi�ich �hey can 1.ive w�.th �,�iChin Lheir �*ai- ue �ystc;�s :.nd liie c�:perienccs. . � �� � ,. R .� � doe� xtore th3n treat ;�. - It is tl�.e ph�losophy a� \ucleus that �ood ��eal.th care � ^� eo�2e to ta�ce �.t is eUUCa4:iOri1J. aTlu encourutr�s �oun P k the nedica� proble�,.; ° . ° . . . , xesponsibility fox the�.r o��;n nealLh. � � : , � �Good health care treats the total pat�.ent, reco�r.i�a.n� �1nd ed catio aI needs � must be dcalt i�zth in terms of the �hysxca�, er�o�ional, � .. . of the indfvidual. � . _ persons s�zll co,;.e to t:ucl�us so? e1.y for Medical. reasor.s; so�e will coi:�e� - � Some ------------ .. �- sole3y for Cou�selin�, iia:�y «�1J- ��.12d need °i bo�.h serviccs. .' ' • - • � ' ' - � . , � . . '� > _. • . . '� ' � � � , • . " . ' . • - � . i • . . � • . • , • � . . . . ' . ' .' ' . . • � • . • j ' " : • • , • , � • . • . . . • • • � • ' • . . • ' � ♦�'. � � ' . . . . • � ' . • '. . . � • • I. • � ' � � . . . . • . • • ' . • . •, . . . • • � ' . � . • � • , • - , • ' - • . � . ' i�d � . ' . � � I__J ' C_ J � ' ' � � � .�c,_ F�OLES OF CLINIC VOZtJNTEERS Receptionist Itole For Pde�a Persons : Greats persons comir_g to Nucleus, sets the tone for a friendly, non-ju3gemer.tal, helping r�lationship. Asks person to fill out t��o identification caxds, one to be filed alphabetically,.one by number; files siich cards. Assigns�p2rson a number, Has person fill out a health history form. Refers person to a screener. Upholds thz �?ucleusconfid�ntiality policy,; i.e., does not dis- clos2 nanes of persons vi.sitin� Ivucleus to ar.yone, keeps any in- formation obtained confident�.al within the professional staff. For Returning Persons: Astcs person's nucnber {may need to consult aZphabetical file if numb�r has bean forgotten). Refers person to a screener. Upholds the td�cleus co:nfidentialiiy policy as stated above. ,Screer�er Role The screener may be a person with thv sazre professional preparation as a counselor or nay Ue a person who has beea s�ecifical_1_y train�cl.to p�rform the screening fi:nction: � Interviews pprsons coming to�`Nucleus, It is important �hat the screener continue the friendly, non-ju��emental, helpin� r2lationship �•�nich �aill be carried on ti2xou�haut that person`s exp�riences at I�iicleus. Determines the reasons for the person's visit to Nucle.is. This may , necessitate tl�e screener probin� beyond the person's initzally stated reason for the visit. • I ' rlakes the initial decision concerning who the person shall see next. • �(I.e., couns2lor, family planning consultant, nurse, physician, or other a�ency.) . Completes Lhe appropriate form. � . �G L_� ' � ' � -5- tlaintains the NucZeus confidentiality policy; does not disclose names of persons visiting �ducleus to anyone; keeps any information obtained confidential �aithin the professional staff. Counselor Ro1e The counselor is a person �•;ho has achieved at least the rlaster's Dagree level in counseling, social iaorl:, or anothPr related field of study, and will pre- ferably hava had professional e�cperience in counseling. Some counseling �aill occur as the result of persons comin; to Nucleus for medi-- , ca1 reasons which involve nersonal and social adjustment. Other persons will come to Nucleus see':;ing only counseling for social and/or emotional adjustment. �J � � ' � � � � �� ' � � � Counselin� �aill help people in defining the�r problems, in considering alter- native solutions and in salectin� and implem�ntin� courses of action. Person- aI counseling r.;ay involve several visits or regularly scheduZed appointments. Glhen appropriate, counselors ��ill arran�e far referrals to other agencies. Counselors wi.11 maintain th� f�Iucleus confidentiaiity policy� Ftill not disclose names of p�rsons visiting t3ucleus to anyo.ne, �,�ill keen information obtained confidential within tbe professional staff. Family Plannin� Consultant The fami].y planning consultant is availa'�1� to nersons interested in any or aIl birth control alternatives. In order to becone more faMilizr F.*ith the �ndivic�ual, the consulta�t discusses the family planning informatian already o3tained by that pexson, its arcuracy o'r inaccuracy, and what r�,etl�od, if any, is presently bein� used. Since in a given relatzonship, sexual responsibiiity to oneself and to one's partner necessitates a mutual concern about birth control, the consultant nay discuss how the decision to seek birth control infornation was �nads, tol�o �ade it, etc. .� . A menstrual h3.story is taken. The various r�ethous o� fam�ily plannzng are covered, t:eepinp in mind that even ttiouJh some methods are more reliable tlian others, the use oi any contraceptive�is only as effe�tive as the individual is conscientious. The pill, intra-uterine device (I.U.D's), diaphragm, foams, condoms, rhytl�m method, and coitus interruptus, are discusse�l in terms of effectiveness, proper usage, cbtainability, advantages and disad- vanta�es and possible side effects. � �J , , ' a'l'7 Physician Role The ph��sician is a licensed medical doctor who strives to pxovide medical , care with the highest of inedical standaxds in an environment which is non- jud�emEntal and non-ttireateninJ. i � � � Diagnoses and traats V.D. in lioth sexes, including checkir_p, the patient`s his�ory, e�aminin�; the patient as necessary, confirming the patholo;ical diagrosis and cliscussing tha disease and treatment Gri�h Lhe pati�nt. Prescribes appropriate treatment and plans for adequate follow-up. Is responsible for fanily pianning advice given to both sexes. This zncluues ch�cking the history and examining the patient, including a pelvic and breast exa;�ination and physical. examination as indicated. Pap s�ears and G.C. s�°ars aiid cultures are taken as indicated. Final counselin� on birth control is in the form af dis�ussion be- ' twe�n patiant and p�iysician �nd the appropriate prescription given or device inssrted at the physi�ian's discretion. Tl�e pnysician will arranoe for a�equate follow-up. � � , � LJ �� � � � � Pregnancy examin�ations will be conducted by the physic_an and �olien conf3.rmed, the r�_atter discusszd with the patient. Th� person would then be referred back to the counseZo� to discuss prab2ems and alternatives. The physicia:� may wish. to refer a patient bactc to a counselor or the family planning co�sultant after examination. The physician upholds the Nucleus confidentiality policy; does not disclose nam�s of pezsons v�sitin; Nucleus to anyone, keeps informa[ion obtained confidential �aii.hin the professional staff . � Laboratory Personnel �. , Labora�ory personn�l are re�istered n�dical t�chnologists, registered medi- caX laboratory assistants, or certified laboratory assis�ants. Laboratory personnel conduct tlie laboratory tests requested by the piiysic:Lan. � Tests �ahich are run at P1ucleus include: urinanalysis, tJ.B.C's and differenti- als, pregnancy tests, G.C, smears and other gram stains, trichomonas and yeast wet preps. We hope to be able to do hemogloUins in the near future. Chemistries and pap smears are sent to Doctox's Dia�nostic LaboraCory and must be ident:ified by patient name, address, and nunb�r. G.C. cultures and sniears are sent on transgroi� mecil.a to the State Board of 2iealth and must be identified by name, adc]ress, and number; (o G � ' � � Laboratory personnel draw blaod for tests which are sent to S�eidl Lab, the St�te Board of Health, and tlie Anoka State IIospital LaboraCOry with patient name, acldress, and number. ' Laborato-ry personnel wzll uphold the I3ucleus corefidentiaZzty policy; will not disclose name.s of persons visiting iducleus to anyone, will keep information obtained confidential �aithin the professional staff. Fa�ily Plann?ng 1. Receptionist has the person •fill out identification cards and history forms; assi�ns the person.a nu�ber. 2. Screener/counse2or sees the person and discusses reasons for cor�ing to Nucleus. 3. The person sees the family planning cansultant if continued interest occurs. �Iera information is given and menstrual history taken. 4. The nurse talics tait� person about health history and the exam to be given. 5. The p�rson saes the physician for gynacolagiaal exam, pap smear, and, where in3icated, G.C. culture, and discusses with the physician the various birth control alternatives. 6. The person is given at least a�veek.to conszder passible �lternatives and returzs i.f still int�rested. Ttiis minimizes spur-oi-the-moment decisions.� 7. The person receives birth con�trol pills, prescription, oz device, aC the pttysician's discraLion after a one-w�ek waiting peri.ad. 8, The physician arranges for follow-up. �Also, this should generally allo*.� sufficient time for pap smear results and, �,rhere indicated, G.C, culture results ta be available, prior to aclminister- ing birth control. n, Pre�nancy Testino 1.. Tize person sees receptionzst, fills out identi.fication cards and the health history form, and receives a number. 2. The person sees a screener/counselor and cliscusses the reasons for coming to Nucleus. 3. The nurse discusse3 the history ��ith the patient and reassures her about tlie exam and tests �ahich will. be conducted. , 4. The physician examines ttie �atient and arran�;es for �ao worl; as indicated. Ttie physician relates results of tests to tlie patient and discusses their meaning. • �1 �O � � ,` ' � ' , ' ' -9- 5. Zf pregnancy is confirmed, the physician refers the patient back to counselor for help in solvin� problems and deciding upon a course of action. - a. The patiant often iias already decided upon arr�en�ements f�r tnedical care and consultin� �•�ith bo�=friend/family and can handle the s:ituation herself. Referral nay be made and follot�r-up should be encouxaged. b. If the patient has made a decision about abortion or hav- ing the baby out of �.iedlock, the counselor assists her in referral to an appropriate agency and arranges for £oliota-up. Examples: Birtilright, �,utheran Social Service, Compre- , hensive H�alth Departnent, tdomen's Counseling Servicing, etc. c. If the patient is undecided, tne counselor h�lps her consider , alternatives, encourages her to tal�: with her boyfriend and her parents prior to malcing a decision, and ��here indicated ar- ranges for further counseling sessions. d. The counselor encourages follow-up counselinP and follora-up medical care tahere not taken care of by an ouCsicle agency. 6. If p�rson is nofi pregnant, the physician �ay refer her back to the eounselor and/or to the family planning consultant at his discretion. V.D. Testing 1. The person sees rece�tionist, fi1ls out identification cards and a health history foxm and receive;s a number, 2. The person sees a scr�enerJcuunselor and discusses reasons for co:ning to A'ucleus . � 3. The nurse discusses tI�e history with the patient and r�assures him/her about the exam and tests �aha.ch will be conducted. • � � 4. The p}iysician examines the patient, conducts r.ecessary tests, and re- lates the results �o th� patient. The physician arrun;es for the patient to receive results o£ tests which must be sent o�t at a later date. 5. The person is given inform�tion materials on prevention of V.D. and may be referred for counseling or family planning. 6. Where V.D, is confirmed, the patien� receives appropriate treatment and the ptiysician arranges for folZow-up. ?. The �atient is encouraged to fill out contact cards or encouraged to contact those persons himself/herself if unc��ilJ.ing Co £i11 out the cards. c ` �� � •y , � ��:' . NORTN SUBURBAN YOUTN SERVIC� C��1TE�? ' ( i' _� .,� , r � �� ' � �'�, � •. . �:`' r�� r"\ t ,:.:= ���<. . �' ` . �� : � � F � t � ,r f ♦ �p „�, '�� v ,.u;r�: < :��°'" r . �,_ _�.�.. ,, 4;_;� ' ' ;' ''..:�' � 3 - - � _ y,,,,,,�..y+"`'- � _�,, .�i •.'� 10303 HANSON BLVD. CQON RAPlDS, MI11lN�SOTA 55�33 .dUCL�'JS CLIi1IC C 0��,?S��'LIi�;G �?:� OC��T��R:�a � "" d ' t . . __., 1 �,f �,� rier. e at �:.zc:�eas Clinic there ' �~ . �` � :�� ``� is n� snecific �y�.�nseli.n� ..�'"y- 4� n me thod � t• � bs f�11 �:-�ed . ^h.e - ��4 :_a.� -- counse?_or j,rill use his �r her 1 ` � � . , � e � ��.� ` . proi .=ssio!:�l ,jud�,�ent and counse� in� r ' `� . � ° ' ' � skills. '?'he counselor�s fiI.e P.=a'CE �.'�+� ` �57-2t2� should � nclude �n �ccurate, � /u'JCLEUS 755-5300 _ {::'�i/ORKSNO° J.O.B 755-5300 ��5 � �'��a -�.ated �� ��� ---descrirtion of eac�^ � � �, �;s � � � , � � i �� t . tl al ' . _, .. _ �'i����..�`C�i11.i� sv°5.�1.7i1 - •- ---techniq���:s used ___C�.� v�'G t S T'F,�C'�1�=1 ----cli� �t'; c�unselird history . ---rei �rrals `�� arr•��`;a�r;�nts f or f ollow-up --- met� t i�n ��.0� f�e T�� �DICt� LL�T R�L��iED C�'i �3Si.:Ls.?�; a ?Fcr''���?�;:�?C�Y: 1-s.:yTmp�orr.s, wh�t. ma?�_e: rar thir,« � � �- 5:1.. l.� T�x'v�t1�9i2� 2-explor�; ��1�er'n�.�:�;e; ni 'J�JS?':."l�T� or ne�at�tiTa dia�n�sis D'JSl'fl�T�:. ^"E.liC1�7I�G� ��`l� p�t.ien �� a U�'8: E'.�'1� T� ��'•Z1`1�,S• -- ex�lore alfiernativ4s: . h2,Z*�.�?�; i:,-he chi� d � kF: er in� �h� c hild �'� z.' i?1 c, ± 1'l c C�? i? Ci. t2 U i' O Y' 2 �� '� J� l.. i2 �>EET�1^u �.^.� Ct1�ld ar1Ci. 2?1�2'T'ia�� � -- . � �r���p h��� ar f'OStel' horre 1 . �• i'utura birtt: con-trol afte� ciaL� �=ery po� sibili.�ty �f ?.� --ir1=�tFiods o� si-�:•3rwn�; .•r;t;:� z a,,�� iy and. frie�c:�. ne�ati-�a:e�rllar� birtn c�n�-r�1 Dosaib�.li�ies explore se�c?;�1 relatio:�ships p�sitive �r, ne;;a�i�.a refer to f� mily _�l^nn� n� consu? tar.ts possibi�.ities oP ��J . a � . . � � 1 ' ' 6 � �+'E�1�:?i�AL �IS��A3�: explore s�tmpto�s o`' oonorrhoea and syphilis . rout�ne �o��rrh�a c.iack af all females �;j ;�, . no syn'�il�s test unless thar�, are st��.cific s yr�� t oms methods �f ��r��centi�n o.f �� s��.te law deman�as t.hat c�:�tacts be tested cons9_der�ti�n of' birth cantrol I'ti'�'ILY PL?i=1i�?I,vTG CGL��I6�LI��1G: �l�i'�1.�1tL'J 1 G1 vr.l iliJ C� �.�i�t V ��'.� 1 C�'�1� L�r plannin� C'.J=1JL1��Qt2 V• ----_e�plore pat�_e.rz�� � s in7 �rm=ztion • ��--c:.oes t!�e qu�lit� �? tn� rel_at��nship warrant �� a sexa:�� dir.�ensio� a�Zd bzrt:� control? -�--person�� and. parantal -� �iuzs co:�cerri-�� 'c�irth coni;rol . ---i �rese�able e�'1 ects on i�; �u-re heteros�exual re? a- - tionsaips and self-�:�a�e . '---( :fa.ail;� pia��i;�� ca:�:sui�?n�s L�itl deal with t�he phys �.ca� e� � ec �s oi t�ari�us met:�ocs oF p C) BRI4,Li i:,.'L:�L_'�7��;r�IVi. .`JF' �Pi�,.�7�:'� G1�'�'1`i : . . . 1 al.l i,\i�Y.�n are dra:an i or rab:�7.Za : a bl�oc,. tast chec',in� tne � iFc111�a��Lf �,"--GP,C'Y"-�3?"I 7i,8aS1£.'S Vc^.tCCl?'?�t'1Q:1 �3P:1'f. '�".'J �. . public he��th de�t) � �`�11 tia�men r=�ceive a�on�rrhea eneck: a cuit�re tak_ea fr�m t�'1� 'C -C3?'ii 1X. � �'["10�° LdrJ�i';E'�l Ni�?O Ylr;GC� l�� t'J�i3 SM�Br'S �iu �c�=fE;i1: u 57r3�7' �8?�P.!2 fr�� t�L� certTix tes�in-v for earl;� i�dicati�ns �f ' cancere _ - . � ` `� '---- �� 0 I ' ' idGT�: ii t'n�ra is tim� io�� a brea'x �.�:.���?� c��nic tin��, fee�L i'-ra� �o �a��e a cuo ��' c�f=ee. I� you wi.,h . to ��isi t wi �h �a;xy a-Lhars ori tiie st4�'f' w=h� are ;�ot basy, please ?�isif, in o:�e e�' �'�� �T i ice� ar.c� r.ot arour?d th�; racap�:io?7is�'s d.esi�p ' � �� `_�'hanks . - -- ���CLEliS CL�i�iIC t � `-, . _ `�a�� ��. • � , ' sT aTE oF rY7zvr�Tr ;oT a COVERNO.�'S CO:l�1i�3ISSi0�' C�ivT CRIyIE PRF�'f:ti'TION A;�iD CONTPOI. PRQGKESS REPORT 1. Grant �'umber 1307710373 1 This report is submitted for the period indicated � and is based un aMual 2ccon:�lishments of this project. 2, Date of Report 3-19--7�. � 3. Title ef Pro' . �"t� North Sabi�rban Youth S�rvices Coordinatix�g Center , 4. Type of Feport: �..._.J �e;�lar. ❑ Special Report � F;nal Report From _ Through 1-1-7 2 -28 -7 5. Grantee :�;e��cy.or Institution � � Si�r�(�3ture of Project Director (I�Bn:e, ad:iress and te�ephone) /� y'j� -- City of Coon Rapids - ��� {' �'t� � , ibaature of Attthorize� �Oiiicial % 1313 Coon Ra.pids blvd. Coon Rapids, ��Li.rn. 55�33 �'�.�` �"i���� 6z2-755--?��o � � `.____'_.- Segin below and add as many contiauation�' pages as may be �ztecessary. Project Dzrectors Report G J" -, The second quarter oi the second �rant year has been one of gro��rth and change. We are continui_n_� to �increase our emN�.asis on faru.ly counseling and group work. - During this quarter ti,�e have esLab�ished this r,!echanism for 5 groups categories, i.e., abandoned garents, elerentary, �ee�-age (2), and womens group. Th� leadar �, and facilita�ors have gor�e thraugh extensive training and z�ri11 be beginning around April ls. 'I't��s program should pay for itself. ' , �.��- � ' Tn look�ng at some type of cost effectiveness analysis as one means of evalua- tion we could use the folloV,ririg fio res: Annual cash outlay $70,000 (��,833/mo. divided by average manthly client load -�00 equals about $1�..60/mo. The term cli.ent here refers to the 30 second phor_e call up to the 10+ hours of family coiuiseling, so obv�.ously, the average figure is only oi lzmited value. We axe about to enter into t,he final stages of negotiations t,r_'!th Anoka County on parfi,ial flzn.dirig for the fi_nal thi�d of this year and to take �preliminary steps for next year. At this point it looks good, but by no means certailz. I��:: �deni.a;- �-;;", we �n�u1d 1�'•-= sc,>-,: feed};�cl: "� r:r:�. you fo3.l,. s or� c.:� ev�l.un'-.;_oi� l,-�- tJ �c,t: ��. ;;c ; rts . We fet:' �hat it i�a ,--::z;; posi �i Te docur;ie.��c . n ' 1 __,.DON WEGSCHEIDER - PROGR�1 DIR./COUNSELOR - COMMENTARY North Suburbari Youth Service Center is growing into a very comprer.ensive servi.ce center. We still deal TJ��ith crisis by Peace Line, JOB, and Nucleus Clinic. How- ever DJSYSC is becoming a iamily t,herapy cF�nter in which each member of the iamily can receive counselin�, group t,ro rk, and education within a reasonable time for under $60. The staff and their job descriptions have �ecome clearer for efficiency sake and yet none oi our iniormality i.s lost. The County evaluation gave us much hope for , County approval and iundino, (t:Thich has not yet been realized} . TrJe have implemen- ted the�.r recommend �tions,especially in tti� area of administration. As our grant � runs out ti•:e are hopin� the cc:�-nur_ity wzll respond to ena'ole us to continue. The City has been more ihan generous. Qur spaca is beco:ning incraasingly limited because of gro�ring clientele. Conse- , quently, i�Iarch is plar�riing monih for Tllaximi �1.ng the use of our facilities. Patrick Breslin is pregressin� iti his study oi chemical dependency at the U./M. � Sharon Lea,our intern fror� r�letro Co.��ur�unity College, is a•very competent. ia*nily counselor and group leader. I titi�ould like to hi.re her on part time basis. IPat Ry�n, trained in che:n�.cal dependency, is also doing wnrk with P.A.R. and her school district. Siie is a very� important part of our staff. John Car�s�r�_�.�in c?ar�iying his nours of s�r�rk has been more efficient in calling ��d filing, consequently he has been freed up for other things. I am planning an educational e�perience at the Esalen Institute in March. ' , I_ � � - ' �, � u m � � � _. � _ II , Tota1 Calls Average Age : ..' . Purpose of call ' Ilrugs . � Sexuality RelatiansY�ips �,-' General - , Referr�.ls made: Nucleus � NSYSC :.��'� � Annex Red Door _-., Bridge Pharm House .� So.Side P-Sedical _� C.R. Clinic Birthri.ght '.;�., Anqka County � Hennepin County I , Crisis Intervention I:.. � Face to Face .�.�� -� � 0 � : . G. � PEACE LINE �1973 - ?�t December January February 115 82 151 18+ 17�- 22+ lo� i5� 9� . 10� 15� 10� � 35� 22� 1�7� 1�5� �8� 3�.� 4 3 � 6 6 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 ' 0 l . p 0 2 1 0 1 1 �. 0 1 1 . 0 1 0 ` 0 0 1 0 .� ' � . JOB 1973-7� : ..� ' � �a3�loyex Applications Youth Hired :i Ntrc�EUS cL�zc , . Total P1w-nb�r SMajor reasors forcomin�: � ' _-' Pregnancy vD ;:, Other .. ` � Average Age .'` � C!� . Anoka _ ' Blaine Coon Rapids :� Fridl.ey ::' Other • COUNSELING ' �a��au�: . !y • .;' Short tezm Other stat��tics not available at this time. �.. � . ,. � .- � � December 2 !�0 : 11 39 8 . 18 12 �. 11 5 26 0 January 3 0 � !� February � 3� 8l�. 112 15 13 50 65 . �.9 3�. 17+ 17 11 . 3 23 11 36 . s 28 13 27 9� 35 � 1 - ' :.' ' ' � FAMZLY 1973 - 71� December � � ' zr 1 Average: fi.e sessions 3 ------ --.___.. -.__ _ _ - -- - �. � Coon Rapids � Blaine 7- �.' .Fridley 2 . Anoka 0 :� � Col.umbia �Iei�hts � , �ther - 6 .. � . . GROUPS Average: five sessions �_ � Location: Coon Rapids : _ , C-� rcle Pine s Other ." , F`ricll.ey _. , Blai.ne ..' , :., �, :�:' � ,.., ` ' •� � Y � • . ' 7 !� 1 2 .o 0 0 G �J January , Fe �r u.ary 20 _ 29 . 5 7 2 8 2 � 6 . 2 0 2 1 ?- 7 �r 7 17 3 8 1 1 0 0 l 5 2 3 0 . ' ==1 � .-.� � _ .� _, _ : :�c; ":1 �... .: �.;'T1� `�iT �� V�; :J i�'::�"' L1G .. Y�'.i � fi l; • ��/ f� „� V Y v� Ci l l'.'i» L Sa=.:rr�r Snec���r��r L =: � :2 .: c: I ;_; T` �. `.' i; . �`v il i.: v Jr � T' ci'JaC]!:E p'���� i?7 Jana��'-T'�� 8, 1 �74 - ;farie �•iahorse f 'r.arl.a ��,ualey �'err� �'hur�an '^�� �.; � �� '..�J i_ . : :_', J :� . - . . 1r. '�:d���s �� ;d•^o�ts" Re��;�ili��: 3� inquiri�s �hus�ar %. Hr'�ic'�s �£ Tnc�r^�r�+-�n AmanUin� � t':li .7.T'Ci:�G�l. �r��t�il.lv`G�y.'�..• ��v.'i ill�iv.`.'a.��.Z'A Z'J}vJ C.�.:t.5�• G� :t,_,:', ��i�T:'i'_,:JJ: . � ��c��ai�^�r,,�:�ts a�:3 ��li:��'-_o�s of n�a:d r.-er:t;Ers��� orere discussed. �. . It �a�s :,�ts�� t''!?t i� a me�,:c�r �•;°=-e to. m-:.ss �h,r�e c��secutit�e t?^ 8 P. i' 1'.� ,' S' f'^ ° C'1."-_. _ r"".2 :�? Lv rJ U 1� �. 8 T' ;:� 7`c.' 11; j�^., :� :� t" 3 C � t h a t r� e rr:� e i. . , , . � an exercise to �eep� a y�un� �er��ns p�'_nt �f t�l@'vJ .�r�s r»r�-:ed out by tha :�r�u� b� ma'tin� pIa-.;s t� Pntar+ai.n a Z7 yasr �ld fr;en�; for ':ne ��;a�%;e:�: . 2. Fersonnal . � C�1�:"'1C81 Le2��C?��!':Cj 1:7t@T':,--Jt1�T'0:1 L8° 'n1ZZ b° ca�rkin� hsre I�0 h�urs a��r=�ek -�r `hrae r��ti�s. ��.�'s a rrofi�!er of i�., now 410T'�i].C1;, 1;�4IoT'� 2 u�oT'2E l:l ��h��rica�! ��p2n:�er.c;�. .. _ �iE.' �T'8 27tt1U91.25'"_C 2ti7Lli. �'18`; 1:1� ;"WO 1:'l�eT'"1 here fr�:.i the He;�n�r:: n C�anty i�'ental �:ealth ?r��r��. �'hevr �,ri11 eacz �it�e �_. ��CL�':S "J :T' �I2��C! �ili:. c3 Sj"i,� pend 1"l�"Oi�,'�U. 1'���rc". JcS'�c LdiZ�. � assist in family co:�nsel� n� aad t;iil ac� �s � scraener i�r the clinic. Jucq�.�eline �ail°r wil� be talin� nart in �ur P�o?le-'�:akir.� pr��;ra�!., �. On� su�:�estion for ir��pr�zre;�-ent ir�m �h.e Ah�'Ka 0ou:�t3 �Eea��h eiT�luali�n c•r�uld be to ti_;n�an recorl '�cae�in�. . 'Tha me�tir2� was 2;���UI'tl`8� at 8 P."n. - s I .`' 0 :ISv3C r�f:��� �:..'�u�'.�?' �OA�D i•r�ETI:1G I :.`' •Presen�: C�rl Soeichert r'arie :"ah�neY ,�' J�an�e ?�p�in Karla �ualef Sherr;� Sa�'�er�er � Leo� Y;alg�a�.-� Feb. 5, 1574 . Guests:. Dave Adams Cathy Granley Kelli Reiter � ����e�l C�s �3c�4rz� f�'��kY1 h2�-s� �l�i:P"�UP: Iv'G�r �ou ciould extricatz •y�urself fr�r; a b�ring situation -, whara � �u fe�l ±-rapped OLD BU3I:3�S� : l. $6 leozl fee fo: thz ArticZes �£ Inc�rporatiQn . � -,:� 2. �OZT'd T'�°;t?tiJ�r3r21.p D�:� S1TZ,I �or'.�t ou*� a docurter�t o`' cor�.�unicatiln t� be gi�;�en to ne*.�t �n3 pr�s�ec�i�-� :02I'CI �-?ameers, arobably using i;�f�r:�ation fr�m. th� Co�an�y �vGluatior., oivin�, taem an o�Tervie;�t of our proUrar�.s, �' histor� , acco�;_ti1:s'r�;,ents, d.r�ar~s, etc. ; � ._ � .:' �..� : '� : :� 3. Apr�2 could �ossi�l� ba th� month of the start o£ the ALcohoZic Aware�ess �r�ora� f�r city er��loyPes. ' G� 4. V 7��i�ll,y i�Z"��i�c�1.�:7 � � . Peace Lir�e--?:e�atii-e react�on to a f�ke call used for e�ralua�io� fror�: tha pers�n t�st;ad Fa��1�I �.OL2:1S°� ��_�--�'E.'2"f f2�:`JZ`2.�'J�.E �7iT'e*11i.S. i10W L25� 1C2't2Y'--3�B;ZC� f�i^;7; �tucleus---�'iscusse3 �he nu""tiJ2rS c�m�no i� for �astin�; fa:�ily plar�ner,�-- reco:�srz:�dat��n wss that the�T be nurses Br some�ne with equal education JQB__ - NE�?i BL�SI�T-'S� . � .'I L 1. Pers�nnel--;,e�ll be ge�tino a;rouF leader from St. Th�rr,2s 2. Local ��lice 4:i11 be le�trin� a packef of i:�f�rmati�n s�o:•tin? options ava�labl� ior he�p in situ�ti�r.s iahere alcoh�l is =a factor 3. Runa4ravs: . Gragp session for aband�:�ed parznts 1}. Joel Kogm�t�'en, Directornof Youfih Services for CP. will attend our meati Pfeetir_o ad jau�ned aL 3:12 AGE�iDA �OR :'-:�ET1:vG 0�' t�1RCh 5, 1974 6:30 Yr7 at the Ce�ter l. _ �f / -, - • �G''LZ��'C f.% � T- �'�.15lCl�,%! S ;�.�� ���c�sst �-%2�� d'L�fZ ' ��!"/y7 q / � }� ! GZ s�p�y,�t � � / . t -�. � �,- �-��ze�'����U �vr� G�d�Gd�?S��vvlp ._s�v�����s ,. , C�rGc� .��.L�`ctGt�lcrL �%n S�-�'�o �S J� ���. • I . . i. • � . � �, n 1��� s� �L���,� t .� � � ) t -� /7�� 6 ; 3� r � 1'�J�JI. 1Rr..It��a:+T!`'�R` II:if...:{.� Tc�.,�Tl:�ilt � � �/%/ . •. • . ^'er��.�ars Presen+ Carl Scc.; c`�er*, Ch� i.rm�n 5herry 5ner�..�r�;��r � Dr��•e A,iar�s Leon '�:'al�ra� :: � '-fc�th� ;rr,�;l�� Joa�ne ?oYliri, :5ccrata^y ,'arie '"<<�1„1..f D�n ��;e��ch�ic3F.� F^rls �:u�]a;� � J��el Koen:nt�e.^., .::x Gffici� hel?.i Ret`.er i � Februa^y mi�ut�s �rere a^::ro,.�:;d.A cuesti�n was rai�e� .,��cer^.i.^.� tr��ni��i; oi fa�il la�-;ers to rc>.* ���Gn�;;, ���al;tati�n r:;com�:cnd^ _�ns. :'�a•;r�.c�r d:.�c�.:�- ;r' P � si�n +r�f-la�? �.t��*:1 tii�s sc _^.�. ?`rJ 'J].(� tiJl'.S1!It'SS L•18S CGl3CU3Sc;:1. � c� sl'i %- � ? ; ` � • J _ _ 1 1. T� [v�^ rg ;• tn� tl�;-lt �'�'iG C�7T't '��,•%1:.'S ,t'i_�'�7 C JU.^.C11 t�t'. SOCIt'� 2. ` C:1P�i 'J.`� +!i8 .�.. ;r' :'1dC � �!�:�::1T F�?I'..�. ;CBt:?�: +:�:.C]U�'c'3. �:?C :�Of' :� �na�ir�ni:: �"; � �^.y:r��F:� +�7 +-'.__ ._°.C�.. 2.:C:8i..��:. �'C:� aC�U<l� £1�3r.re�ser:, F'3 c•�ell. =.s BU..ii'1'_'.�_�. rece). IE'•.^.f-S , :44J � �: ± f � t;� ; j, �� _C,., .�t �P (J'-;1 ?i:C: �T�31. `•;�@ cl]_50 8?.'c;c.C: '._ � - al�.'.�`�' t. ;? 'r'' .; f- _T'E':1'�Y't=^ f.� 1 . t� .^7�irlri 1 (,-��r.Lv{. �.��._.-�:>SSyT'.^.�'7i L� ��•'�l c..�ar�:.rl�- �r- �;. .�...rt. )., .,�lu re co^'��n..�c as est�:?i� �l b;, ti.� ;,rz;��. _ � e;�en t:i..,J -^ +^^ '"zn' ^:•:i11 ��•,�,r•tZ: be ef_��:ri-�� � :> • _ ` � ' � _.�- � 2. �yiP ..7bT'rt ?•;2;; ,^�!?�':S:';C3 ;:.1T �..,�I':O i^'�:i 2�.�.::�:C1C1�..^:3� �Tr:2� 1 Dc^, v?:.^:v„C: Z;t `�:- .r�'- . ��JCiC�i `�:11�ti?t `_O ::S`=�C12Sil 2. _ ��1C;J i0i _..".:.�:�'.i I.C? .�Z<'s.`':R t'� c'�[��^i._��7 i'�i��?�"_r��i�. . . - . . Cu^ c•ol.`�c;,� is �s ..-���d =n +-i.� C�n^'y �raluation I.=., no cou;iselin�, no reie:� i� =:� .s�:�:ri��. . p p�ss.: i_ s.ac_..1 ,��..�_i^r t.,as su-�:;es`°d hk:lECl". �hg' OUtC�;.e �f Cit� Co•:ncf.i':. D(S�1'J:1 t'iE:CJi'°.3 r:nrJ,.tP� . ' 3. `iuclear C1_�:�c'� P^--s=..is� Si-:�^t2-e *^h� '^ ( �_�``?• ---1 Y: s d���,.y,� , , ::� �i ;� „�- �� � �±.u: , _ �? �, Le �. �°r e;c 2 _ il � .U!' C1�.c3 �..:7� 3'c^.?y!�� i�:G`ar�.ii,.C;ii`.iv !1.^.`.•! �i 9 �''�':'vC: j'',"1:_`B^::. I` idBS Z'2C�';`"'.8:1:2�.:? LhZt +h_g ��.±}e.. �v'SB"1;' :7 � :? ^�'?,i31.^.'_�:1� l"1 7:r area ��± }^O. �_SC.^:i_�:� O� r.2.=.^.IC ��::`SO:Q:'.�:.� +� S71;Cii itic^�I' �"ic�iD. �:'ii�� :"v'C�:^........��'..'...^,1 ..�3 2CCepter_l. l� r:2� a� „7 5'1"c,3±FC3 t�l�� � trP 1° ::cT' ��L^° FT'7I^ �t1i: �'J�T'�� �: �. 83 47°��. F•S t�12 S`n`��'. 1�. Do3 recor�~�r.�ed �hat thz ?�ard co7si.der r2i3ir.� fees for e_o:anselir.� aarrirPs Present fee F&mily Counselin�; ��ssi�^� � 3-1� tidult Ed:aca�i�❑ Pr:,:�rurs �3 Teen ?ro;;rams ��-�. Sch��ls ,: no set fee :veW 57-15� �5 per m�nth $2 pe.r head Discu�si�n unc�«ered �ossible det^er�e�tal eff°ct�. � B�ard t�^nr�<.•ed t%::s ree�~me�d� ti�:�, learinb imple:rentati:n t-o the C�1SCI'8±17''1 OF �OC2. 5. P: �snecti�•e ���rd `.'e^-ber.s Tt was resol�•ed +h��t �r�saec*i�•e membsrs sh�uld be i:�t-��duced `� �!�e E�j2�•;j �jy ynt•itin� }r;�,m t0 �8I't:C1.C8''E 1Cl �'7dPt� nE:0�1:];�S i iiSt' �S 3 �'1Slt'O^. �i:te'_' & Cl'uT":DE^ �i t�'l°:@ ?'151.�"S� t:12 pO�T`(j. i:�;:l.(� t�'?E.'.7 �'7t8 upon th:r�. TE�is �rocedare wi11 b° �.�s�� ?n the >�e�r :'uture �� tizr.ee pr�specti�•e �a�dicates. �ir. _°.00£ oi �itJ:: �udio-risual ciepsrter��t and a counselor, <�nd ?��tn:r:::�clst�:l, •a F'ridlef resid�n� aad :eace Line �olunye-�r, and i�r. J��ah '�?a•:ic3en, ona o� our Clinic Yhy�ici�ns, will all be f�rm.-+11;� in��ited to atter.d our nex� rneetir,�. '. The mecYir.� was A:3 j�urned at E3:10 Next meetin�, April 2--6:30 e .'' . _ � � 0 �� i �I � , �I � ' � ��� �..ITy dfi . � -� � ��� � � U1� �a��.���+�s THE CITY OF COON RAPIDS 1313 COON RAPIDS F3C�ULGVARD COON RAPIDS, MINNESC?TA 55433 612 755-2880 March 26, 1974 Mr. Peter Herlofsky Administrative Assistant City of Fridley 643t University Avenue N .E . Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Dear Peter: 7A As we briefly discussed over the telephone the other day, this letter will serve as a formal request by the City of Coon Rapids For funding assistance by the City of Fridley to help support the activities at the North Suburban Youth Service Center. Several months ago I had briefly discussed this possibitity with Jerry Davis, and it is my understanding that our Youth Services Director Joel Koemptgen has also discussed this subject with various Fridley officials . � . As you know, the Youth Service Center is now being funded in part by a Federal ' Grant through LEAA with Coon Rapids supplying all of the local share . Because of the residence of many of the youths who patronize the Center it was felt that this tocal share should be shared by other agencies . In the case of Fridley Por , example, approximately 10% of the nucleus and counseling programs is due to Fridtey residents . � � ' � � , � The total cost of these programs is $16,740 and $20,095 respectively. These costs are more specifically broken down on page 13 0� the "Evaluation of North Suburban Youth Service Center" compiled by the County Comprehensive Health Department. It is my understanding that Fridley has a copy of this evalua�ion. If Fridley were to reimburse Coon Rapids for 10%a of these costs $3,600 might be a fair sum . However, it is my understanding that your 1974 Budget provides for something less than this, and we would be happy to have Fridley participate in any way it can. With the termination oF the Federal Grant on September 1, we are hopefut that the County will take over a significant portion of. the funding of the Center as outlined on the attached proposed budget for next year. . TWIN CITIES FASTEST GROWiNG SUBURB �;OUNC.�L ti;AN�GER GOVERNMENT • Mr. Peter Herlofsky -2 - March 26, 1974 In regard to the amount that Fridley has set aside for this year, it would greatly assist the Nucleus Clinic to receive this money at your earliest convenience . The Clinic program is presently running about $250 a month in the red because Clinic physicians are paid for their services . If you have any further questions on this matter please feel free to phone me or Joel Koemptgen directly. jmm Attachment � �� � Very truly yours, 1....: � �,� . � � �)� � K . Cottinghar��i �ity Manager v 7B � .� - � - NORTH SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE CEN-T"ER , �� ANNU�L E>CPENSES Salary � - $53, 500 Fringes 9,600 Professional Services 2,000 Telephone i , 300 Po��age � � 400 Travel, ConF. , & Schools 3,400 " Printing 300 Insurance � � • 500 Utiliti�s •1 ,000 Maintenance of Buildings 200 Maintenance oP Other Equipment 300 General Supplies 6,200 Capital Outlay � 800 . $80,000 . , PROPOSFD ANNUAL.REVENU�S City $36, 000 Coun�y �, . � 36,000 Misceilaneous � 8,000 � • $80,00� Note: The above does not include Non Cash Contributions to . the Center which we approximate at �1�,000 annualty m 7C ' � � i� � � �' � � � � � ' I� i � �� � i 1 �. Mf�IO TO : FROM: OFFICE OF TI-IE CITY MANAGER FRIDLEY, MINNN�SOTA March 29, 1974 Tf� HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY b1ANAGER SUBJECT: LETTER REGARDING BURGLAR AND FIRE ALARM SETUP FROM H. B. HILLEGAS, CO��IUi�IICATION DIRECTOR, ANOKA COUN'IY, DATED MARCH 13, 1974 After the receipt of the above mentioned letter, the Police Department and the Fire Department reviewed the material contained in the letter. There were some concerns on the part of the Fire Department, so we had a meeting with Mr. Hillegas, Communication Dire�tor of Anoka County, Him Hill, Public Safety Director, Bob Hughes, Fire Chief, Bob Aldrich, Deputy Fire Chief, and myself on Tuesday, Mareh 26, 1974, to discuss some of the questions we had about the proposal. The concern of the Fire Department was the actual cost of this system to the different subscribers within the different parts of the City along with some operational questions. Also, there was a question regarding our alanns for water and sewer systems, and how they would fit into the overall picture. Mr. Hil.legas agreed to check into this and get us some further data, which we hope to get in twa to three days. Once we have all the information, we will sit down again and discuss it, and hopefully� be � able to submit a recommendation regarding this to the City Council at the April S or April 15, 1974 meeting. Our recammendations are that the City Council receive the communication fro�n the County at their meeting of April 1, 1974, and the staff will submit recor�r►endations regarding the proposal within the next one or two Council Nieetings. F; NMQ/ms Attachments LJ r LJ � � o�t'a�' °V � ' � : �'�► � � �;� N �._ ..._"_�...,.: . llA COUNTY OF ANOKA Office of the County Soard of Commissioners COURT HOUSE --- 421-476D --- ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 Mr. Frank G. Liebl, City of Fridley 222 Mercury Drive Fridley, Minnesota Dear Mayor Liebl: Mayor 55432 March 13, 1974 � Under the present system, Burglar and Fire Alarms are terminated into the nearest Police Station where around-the-clock personnel have been available to watch them. VJith the implementation of , Central Communications the Police Stations will not necessarily be manned around-the-clock, consequently these alarms must be incorporated into Central Communications where around-the-clock persons are on duty. This is also the logical place for them to be terminated ' since Central Communications dispatch personnel have direct radio contact with Police and Fire departments who will be responding. � Using conventional techniques to extend each individual alarm circuit to the Central Communications Center would necessitate a prohibitive cost to nearly a11 users. An alternate s_ystem was sought whereby only one (1) circuit from each Police Station to Central Communications � is required, the cost of which would be shared by all users. Specifi- cations were issued to all Alarm Companies who expressed an interest in the project and a tota,l of four (4) proposals were received. 1 Evaluation of the proposals received, along with consideration about the various proposed supplier's ability to support the system on a long term basis, resulted in a decision by the Anoka County Joint Law � Enforcement Council to�select the American District Telegraph Company, commonly known as "ADT" as the most qualified supplier. .. � The new system will not obsolete the present subscribers existing equipment nor will it restrict the sources of similar equipment for future users of Burglar and Fire Alarms. Costs c�uoted by ADT represent the additional cost over what they no�� are paying. An exception to ' this staternent probably applies to City of Fridley, where special equipment supplied by Northwestern Be11.Telephone Company exists. Some of that special equipment should be unnecessary with the new system � , and when removed should reduce the cost those users have been paying which in effect will reduce the net increase in total costs Fridley residents will have to pay. i I �� , � � � � � � � � , � � � �� March 13, 1974 Page Two. A copy of ADT's propasal is attached which outlines the total aci.ditional cost per subscriber. An initial "installation charge" of $75.00 will be made plus a monthly charge of from $8.00 to $9.50 per subscriber. (There now are approximately 180 total subscribers to Alarm Systems terminating in Columbia Heights, Fridley, Coon Rapids and Anoka Sheriff's Office and assuming 150 or more convert over, the subscribers will pay $8.00 per month.) ADT has stated six (6) months will be required to completely install the system, however, they have suggested portions of it could probably be operational in a shorter period of time. We have notified them of.the Law Enforcement Council's decision sa that they can immediately get started on preparing the hardware. Realizing that some of the present users will likely react unfavorably to the additional costs for continuing their Burglar and Fire alarm system, the Law Enforcement Council agreed that each municipality affected by the changeover should give the notice to the present sub- scribers in their community. This notice should inform each user who now has an alarm in your Police Station (Columbia Heights, Coon Rapids, Fridley, and Anoka Sheriff's Offi.ce) of the following: l. As of approximately July 15 the Burglar and Fire alarms will be "relocated" to the Central Communications Center in Anoka. 2. A one-time conversion charge of $75.00 will be billed by ADT. 3. A monthly charge of from $8.00 to $9.50 per month will be billed to them by ADT, (ADT would bill on a"quarterly", semi-annually, or "annual" basis depending on the individual subscriber's pre- ferenc�.) . Note: The exact amount per month depends on how many of the � present users convert over. Should less than 150 convert over initially, we would expect the rate be revised down- ward should additional users be added later. � �� � � 1 � � On the other side of this issue, the new system should make considerable improvement in the alarm service�available to the x�esidents. Some of these anticipated benefits are: l. Reduction in the number of false alarms attributed to mechanical problems in equipment and line circuits due to its "supervisory" capabilities. � 2. Cleans up the conglomeration of equipment that now exists in some of the stations. 3. Dociaments by means of a high speed printer all alarm activities providing such data as "time of activation", "date", "identification of premise", "nature of alarm" such as fire, burglary or equipment malfunction. ' lMarch 13, 1974 . �. C Page Three. , • 4. Makes alarm service more readily available and more economical to residents in the rural areas of the County than now is possible. � � � � � � Costs for future users would be the same as above plus the cost of the alarm hardware they install at their premise from the Alarm Company of their choice. Alternatives available to people interested in having Alarm Service are as follows: l. Use our proposed system with these rates. 2. Subscribe to a"Central Station" type service where alarms are watched by a commercial organization. Rates would be a very minircium of $25-$35 per month depending upon the distance involved. I would expect that perhaps each of you will have questions about the implementation of this new Alarm System, and I will make myself available at your convenience should further discussions be necessary. ADT would, I'm sure, likewise be available should clarification be needed from them on the proposed system. , 1 , HPH:sm Enclosure � � , � � � • � � Very truly yours, �f���f - ; ��%I �� H. P. Hillegas Communications Director Letters to: Sheriff Ralph Talbat Fire Chiefs Police Chiefs David Stewart', Anoka Mayor Francis Fogerty, Blaine Mayor Bruce Nawrocki, Columbia Heights Mayor . Donald Erla�ndson, Coon Rapids Mayor Frank Liebl, Fridley Mayor David Ballstad-t, Spring Lake Park Mayor E. "Sebe° Heintz Robert W. Johnson � Timothy Breider � z. zx. 0 � PROPOSIIL SI3EET Tnstallatian charge for subscribers: A. Pres�nt Subscribers B. Future Subscribers Monthly rental cost per subscrib�r �s.00 75. 00. � 11D each each A. 75 - 99 Subscribers � 9•S� each B. 100 - 124 Subscribers 9.00 � eacn C. 125 - 149 Subscribers � 8.50 �ach D. I50 and over Subscribers 8.00 � each III. Calendar days to deliver an3 install the proposed system 180 ' days . AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH COMPANY Name o� Bidder . � Date November 23, 1973 Signature of Authorizzd Age�� Location of Service Faci?ity: . - , . AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH COP�IPANY Ashok Rao, Security Systems Engineer Name Typed 2•1am� & Ti'cle of Ag�nt 6401 Goodrich Avenue � � � Address . . St. Louis Park�MN 12 South Sixth Street Address Phone Na . 926-0310 � . � • . 336-3601 � =Phone - . � I r RESOLUTION N0. - A RESOLUTION ORDERING IrSPROVEhiENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERTNG ADVERTISEb�NT FOR BIDS: STREET Ib9PROVEI�iENT PROJECT ST. 1974-4 WHEREAS, Resolution # 143-1973 adopted by the City Council on the 29 of Oct. , 1973 set the date ior hearing on the improvements, as I . � s ecificall noted " P in the N Y otice of Hearing attached hereto for refererice as I Exhibit '�A", and 1G WHEItEAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of the i�nprovements (as noted in said notice) were given ten (�0) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council hearing throi�gh t�ro (2) weekly publicatians of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the � property owners heard thereon at the hearing, as nai:ed in said natice. WHEREAS, Resolutian # 158-1973 adopted by the City Council a£ the City of Fridley ordereri all uf these improvement�, _ _ � NOS�V, THEREFORE, BE IT' FtESOLVED, by �he Gouhcil of the Ci.ty 6f Fxidley, - Anoka County, �iinne�ota as fol�ows: � 1. That the folloc�ing impxovements propased by Council Resolui:ion 1i143�1.973 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as xeasonably possible, to-wit: � � � , . � � l� � Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services and other facilities Iocated as follows: hli ssissippi Street Central Avenue to Stinson Boulevard That the work involved in said improvements as listed. above shall hereafter be designated as: STREET Ih1PROVENIENT PROJECT ST. 1974-4 2. The plans and specifications preparec3 by the City Engineer for such improvements and each of them, pursuant to the Council resolutions . heretofore adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are .. . here'to attached ar�d made a part hereof, are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. - a y Resolution No. Adv. for Bids St. 1974-4 -2- 3. The work to be performed.under STREET Ih1PROVEbIENT PROJECT ST. 1974-4 shall be performed under one contract.. The City Engineer shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements £or bids upo�l the making of such improvements under such approved plans and spPCifications, The advertise- ment shall be published for three (3) �ti�eeks (at least 21 days), and shall specify the work to be done and wi]1 state that bids wi.11b E opened and considered at 11:30 A.M, on the 2nd day of May, 1974 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids �aill be consi.dered unless sealed and filed with the City Engineer, and accompani.ed by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for fzve per cent (5%) of the amount of such bi�d. That the advertisenzent for bi.ds for STREET IMPROVEME;�T PROJECT S'I'. 1974-4 shallbe substantially in form as that noted in Exhibit "B" attached hexeta for reference and made a part hereof. ADOPTED BY THE CITX COUI�CIL OF THE CITY QF FRIDLEY T,HIS DAY OF , 1974. ATTEST: b1ARVIN C. BRtT;VSELL - CI'I'Y CLERK , R> l t FRANK G. LIEBL - b1AY0R 0 �A 0 ���� FROM: CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR./FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: SEWER AND WATER RATES DATE: . MARCH 25, 1974 In accordance with Chapter 236, 1973 Session Laws and the Environmental Protection Agency Regulations, pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, each City is required to adjust its sewer rate schedules by January l, 1974 so that the schedules comply with the above referred to laws and regulations. These laws relate to sewer charges only. Two factors which must be complied with are, tl�at each customer or class of customnrs must pay its proportionate share of the cost of sewage disposal in porportion to the sewage discharge of that customer or class of customers, and sliding scales cannot be used for sewer rates. Based on these guidelines, we have prepared a revised sewer rate schedule for the City of Fridley. Under the proposal, all R-1 customers would pay the same rate. The rate is calculated in such a way that R-1 customQrs in total would pay their proportionate share of sewage disposal. All other types of customers would be on a rate schedule. This rate schedule would not be a sliding rate .schedule. These customers would pay their proportionate share of the system. The rate would basically be $.58,per 1,000 gallons. The sewer rates are based on the assumption the sewer bill that the City pays to the Metropolitan Sewer Soard will average $400,000 per year for the next five years (exclusive of SAC charges). 7his is based on information received from the comptroller's office of the Metropolitan Sewer Board. In addition, the City must collect enough to maintain and administer the sewer system. The total revenue raised from these revised sewer rates will drop approximately $52,557 compared to 1973. This would provide a total sewer budget of $�63,000 per year, exclusive of SAC charges. The sewer bill for R-1 properties would be $10.75 per quarter. This compares with $12.00 per quarter at the present time. The rate for all other properties would be $.58 per 1,000 gallons, with a minimum of a 20,000 gallons �r $11.60. R-1 properties contribute 45.36 per cent of the winter flow at the present time. Under this proposal, R-1 properties would pay 45.36 per cent of the total sewer billings. 0 � T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEWER AND WATER RATES PAGE 2 . It is proposed that water rates also be raised at this time, inasmuch as water revenues were $116,198 less in 1973 than they should have been in order to break even on the operation, plus have sufficient money to transfer to bond funds. Water rates are being revised upward approximately twenty-eig�t perc�nt. This would allow the water operation to break even, that is, the water operation would make enough to make the bond transfers to the bond funds, plus pay the operating casts, including depreciation on certain items. T��e new minimum charge on water would be $6.50 per quarter compared to the present $5.00 per 4uarter. � There can, of course, be fluctuations in the costs of operating a sewer or water system so there is no way to quarantee that rates will not have io be adjusted again sometime in the next five years up or down. c � 0 0 �N � 0 Attachment to Bssiness Item "K" , ' M E2ROPOLIT�\ SE\r1��ER BOaRD � 350 Nietro Square Buildi�g, Saint Paul, N;innesota SS101 222-8�23 ' ' � � ` POLICIES TO I�IpLE�1ENT THE USER CHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 1974 5EV1�'�R BOARD COSx ALLOCt�TIO�I - ,, � � r� � . _ � .. POLICY I _ _ _ � � . Each local governrr�ent unit must adopt a sysfiem of charges for the use and availabili�� af the Me4x000li��n Dispc���l System whicr, will assur<: t��at ea::h �� recipient a£ wasts tr��tment ser-vices �,ritY�i,n or served by the ur►it will �ay iis � proportinr�z���: �harE� af �he �u�rerlt r.osf� al�a�ated to tr,e u.ni.t: 1-�y tlie Board. each year as rea,uir�c3 by� the Feder�l ti�Tater Pc,t�ut�az� GGntrol. �ct� Ar�i�nc3�7iE:nt� of �.�3%2 �_ �- � and the Environmental Protection Agency Rec�ula�i.pn 40GFR 35�905-22,. "User . Charges and Industxial Cost RecavE�y" , . _ ;� Each s�stem c�f �h�xgres m�ast b� �:�dop��ci r�y affici�l aci_iot� of tl-ie gav�rr,ii�� body of the unit establishing ��ie sysfet� and s.ubmi.�ieci to the Board nat late; than - January 1, 1974� Each system of charges m«st �l�e applicabl� �o sewer ser�i.c� �' � : rendered on or afcer january 1, 1974 � T�he allocati�n at re scrve �:��Pacity casis based upon Service Availability Crarge (SAC} policies will not be afiected by the User Charge Regulations and policies adopted k�y trie B��rd, � . POLICY II �■ . The User CY�arge System a�opted by each l.acal, govE�ri�rrient uni.t musf be a constant cost pzr unit based on se�vage flov�i or water consumptian. � r . - _ POLICY III _ . � . Each local overnment �tznit must ssbmit sufiicient financi�l and sewer use g information to demonst:ate that the propartion of the total estimated flow of each 1 user, or class of users, is eaual to the proportion of the total revenue to be col- lected from each user or class�of users. , � � In cases where water or sewage metering is not available and the charge is based on estimated usage, the Iocal government unit m�sst orovide s�afficienfi . information to the Board to establish that the revenue from each user, or class 1 � of users, is pro?ortionate to the flo4v contribi:ted by each indi.vidual �ser, or cl�ss of uscrs, ' Adopted by the Metropolitan Sewer Board on September 19, 1973 - � MKD:kb:km 9.1A.73 ' � I � ' RESOLUTION N0. - 1974 A R�SOLUTION SETTING SEWER AND WAT�R RATES WHEREAS, the City of Fridtey, in accordance with Chapter 236, 1973 Session Laws, and the Environmentat Protection Agency Regulations, is required to adjust its sewer rates from a siiding scale to a rate schedute based on the customers� proportionate share of the sewage flow, and . WH�REAS, the City of fridley is also �equired to revise the � water rates to cover the increases required for the operation of the department without a loss, � � i � � 1 � � 0 �� � NOtJ, THEREFORE, Bf IT RESOlVEO that the foltowing rate,schedule sha11 be in effect for water and sewer service for the City of Fridiey.. These rates shaii be effective with the first billing after adoption by the Ci ty Counci i. Water Rate Schedule 0 - 10,000 Gal. 10,000 - 20,000 Gal. 3o,aoo - 50,00o cat. 50,000 - 100,Ot�0 Gal. 100,000 - 200,000 Ga1. � Over - 200,QOO Ga1. Sewer Rate Scheduie (a) Single Famity Dwetiings (Including Townhouses and Co�dominiums) (b) Ail Others � (Including Multiple Oweil�ngs, 7�ailer Gourts, Comnerciai, and Industrial} «� $ .65/1,Q40 Gat. - Minimt�m $ 6.50 $ .50/1,000 Gal. - Next 20,000 Gat. $ .44/1,000 Ga1. - Next 20,000 Gal. $ .38/1,000 Gai. • Next 50,000 Gat. $ 036/1,000 Ga1. - Next 100,000 Gal. $ •33/1,000 Gal. - Over 204,000 Gal. $ 10.75 per quarter $ 11.64 per quarter - Minimum based on 20,000 Gat. Ov�r Minimum -$.58 per 1,000 Gal. based on wsnter water usage. PASSED AND ADOP7Eb BY THE CI7Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TNIS DAY OF , 1974, ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Srunsell MAYOR Frar�c G. Liebi 13C n , , RESOLUTION N0. -1974 RESOLUTION TO CONVEY TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA CERTAIN LANDS CONVEYED IN 1971 TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR PONDING PURPOSES. THEN TO REPURCHASE FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AT APPRAISED VALUE FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRADING SAID LOTS FOR LAND TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF A CITY PARK JUST ACROSS THE STREET TO THE SOUTH. WHEREAS, an improved drainage system is being installed in the vicinity of Lots 10 through 15, Block 6, Oak Grove Addition, said lots being located North of Mississippi Street and East of Fridley Street. WHEREAS, this drainage system renders said lots needless as ponding area. �WHEREAS, the area South of Mississippi Street in this ge�eral area is being developed for residential single family homes and a portion dedicated for park purposes. and WHEREAS, The City would need more park area than the dedicated portion and rather than have two sarall parks on each side of Mississippi Street, . NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Fridley Council, that the City of Fridley return aforementioned lots to the State of Minnesota and request the right to purchase same at appraised value to trade or sell for lots adjoining said dedicated park in the Harris Lake Estates Addition. ����-� �� � _� _ . � , � � _ �" � 0 14 ' RESOLUTIQ"J N0. - 197�+ A F2FSOLU7IOiJ ;='�UTNORIZI�JG AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTI�,�G OF SPFCIAL F�SSESSMrNTS O�d PARC�LS 40, 80, 14fl, :1P�ID ?_40, L�T� 1-3, -�u�zro2�� �UBDIVISION N0. 15_', �ti.'?;:�S, certai n sp�ci <31 assessments have been tevi ed wi th respect i:o certai n land and said t�nd has subsequent1y been suia�ivided. P10`,J, TN�?�FO'ie, 3"c IT �z��OL�IED as foltoa�s: Tnat the assess�nnts lAvied a�ainst the fotlo+,�in� descrioed parcels, to-�•�it: �'�rcel s�!1, ��, 1�1Q, �.nc� 2�+0, Lots 1-3, Auci t:or's Suhdi vi si on ;do. 1�3, may an�' shal t�p �� ;�or.tione� �ncs di vi ded as fot to�•�s: Ori �i n :1 Parc�l � p�rt oL Lot t, P;:rc^1 j��, ^,uditor's Subdi vi s; on '!o. 1�3 ?art of t ot 2, Parc�l �'0, ,°�.uc►i tor's Subdivision `;o. 173 P�rc�l 1��0, ;',�.:�i �or's "tabdi vi sion "do. t 53 °art or Lot 3, °:�rc�l ?_j�0, huditar's �UJG�1 Vl S1 O� i:0. i j3 ' �� Di vi si on of P�rcel ,";pprovcci , Part of Lot i, Parce1�40, Auditor's Subdi vi si on ��o. 1$3 � ' ' Func �'�' ;�1 �� (Interce�tor ) „egul �:r �:'i (hlai ns ) 11-34-G (':lat. t-t. ) � jv� Jt�iL'o CUilil. SS ;,��? S�i ;r1 � (Ynterc°p.or) �erular ��s (uains) rl-31r-:; �`,'at. Lat. ) . i9o7 �erv. �onn. SS ;,32 SW ;'rl � ( �ew. Lat. ) JtY :�tt3 :J� t 1 �+�-F�i�Cp��i)i� / R�gul�r �f� (t�lains) '�i-3�-� (';�lUt. Lat.} 1�57. ��rv, ronn. SS �'r�2 �'>� ;fl � ( Intercep±or ) "egul �r S.± (��i:�i ns ) 4�-'4-) (',dafi. Lat. ) 1;67 ���rv. Can�. �S ;`#82 � �.a n {; SW ;;=] 6 ( Interceptor ) ReguT ar „ (tlai ns ) :r-34-) ('>r:t. iat.) 1g67 Serv. Conn. .tn� SS rt.-�_ Ori gi nul �';r�ioun� PGi d P�i d °ai d $ �_�7,�t� rJ2 �2� . Pai d Pai d Pai d � 8b0.00 � , .,v1 .5� Pai � Pai d " Pai d Pai d $ �n9.12 3�1.1; Pai d . Pai d Pai d $ 1,01�.24 �,75�083 12,07��� Or � gi nal �'lnount Pai d Pai d Pai d $ 227.01� 662.zo � PAG _ 2, Rc SOLUTI 0�t v0. -] 974 � �l ;�ESO�UTIOi� ,��.1TNO�I�Ifdu i\ND DI°ECTI�lG TH� SPI.ITTIIdG OF �PFCIAL ;SS�SSt1cNTS Otd Pf�RCELS 40� g0� 140, �.iJD 2'�0� LOT� 1-3, tjUDITO?�S SU3DIVISION N0. 173 Part of Lot 2, Parcel �0, �'�uditor's Subdivision tlo. 153 Part of Lats 1-3, P�rce1 1��, Audi tor's ��.�bc'i vi si on ;10. 153 Part of Lot ?, ('arce3 2�+0, ,=;ucli tor's Subdi vi si c�n ::a. 15 ti SIJ a';`t6 (In*erceptor) - t;egu 1 a r 5fi (t•1ai ns ) ��1-;=�-� ('�lat. Lat.) 1°�% S��rv. �onr�. S S �';�:3 z S':J ';1 5( S e:,l. L a t,) S�1 ,-',�1 6 ; Interceptor ) �egi�� ar "�� Lr-�'f- ) i;67 �^rv. Conn. �S ;`J2 S'-! "l6 {Int�rce�.or) „zgu i �ar �;� tI°Sai ns ) 1�Y���t�� ��Slcl. � • LJ� • � 1;67 Serv. Conn. SS ;��� � Pai d Paid Paid $ 850.00 3,� 53.l+3 Pai d Paid Pai d � �; d $ 509.12 '1,!i4.h.�,0 Paid Pai d Pai d a 1,�1�.?Lf ,� t, � � ,� 3 � r 1�¢. ; , :�1�,0%�:,.lU ;�DO°T:D 3Y T�i� �iTY �C�J;vCIL 0� TNG CITY 0� �';T�LEY TtII� �:;Y OF � i J]ti. - ;1TT;::iT: C:TY �L:: .'+: t�arvi n C. 3runsell «� �1.-�Y+J2 ._.�....�'. �rank G. Lie'�i 0 �A °;.SOLUTIOi� ?�0. - 197�+ :1 °�S�LUTIO�� ;;UT4i0:I'IPlG r1r:J CInE�TI;r'G TH� SPLITTI�.� OF �P_CI.at RSSE�Sl�1c�dTS 0I1 PraR�EL 7?_OtJ, S�CiIG�d ' � �„}{� ;�_�,:�5s cert-�i n speci _�l ussessr�e:nts hav� l�een levi ed t��i th respect to certai n 1 and and sai c! 1�n�i h�� s suasequ�nt 1 y been subdi vi ded. ;l01t, Ti��?::rOZ�, �= :� .�_�OLU�� as f-olto!-rs: That th^ assessnents 1�vi ed -�gai nst th� fo1 lo��.i n� desrri bed �arcei, to-:,�i t: Parcel 7'i�7, �ecti on ', n�y �nd shal l�e a�;orti oned and di vi ded as fol lo�•rs: Ori rii n�i� P�rcel Parcel .7�t?�, S?ctio;� •? �i vi si on o � P�rc,l�',npr�v��i P�rcel ??�0, S�ctian � Parcei %27i)� .Ci°CtlOtl � Parcel 72;0, Section 3 Funu ;2egul =r S;; tl .."�+ . �': � ; =�: � � �T. � =: 7 � -<< S1-! v �S ;.-`102 (t1�toLat.) S':! U S� ;;'i02 ('•.'a~.;.at.) S�•i J 5� ;�;i�J2 (Se;r:Lat.) �'>1 & S� -r1�� (�e:•..� ut.) S'.J U SS t;`i 02 (�torm �ewo ) Fund Ori gi i�al :;maunt $ Paid Paid Pai d Pai d $ `+4,�32.7' 11,^]0,�� ??_,200.20 ) 5,7 ��'.�3 7li,71�.1" �j1�o,.}31.t; Or i c�i na 1,y.�ount �egul ar S�� Qai d l•1 .`r`'34 Pai d A �'�! � �3 ;;�1t?2 ('�.�iar.�at.) � � }6,�5;��.1i �'�! & �� ,�;�t0' (��orm :iew.) 27,.�^.i}�.% i ;egu1 �r S,"; , F'ai d ;�1 ;`�-',4 � Pai d S';d & SS ,r10�'- (',tut.! 3t.) $ 28,142.v1 S1'1 � SS `,•`10' (Sell.Lat.� 3?,20�.20 S;�! � S� ;;�102 (Stnrr;� Sew.) ?9,`%�7.27 Regul ar S,a t1 t�`;4. S',J ;; J3 �' ST. 197�-4 SW � SS :=102 (',JataLat.) Sl,I & SS ;r102 ( �ew.Lat. ) S1J & 5S �102 ( Storm 5ew. ) Pai � Pai d Pai d Paid $ 11,910.60 16,759.�? 17 1�5.1� �31 0, �31.13 ADQPl'�D BY iH� CITY COUt3CIL OF TNE CITY OF FRIDL�Y THIS � DAY OF , 19740 MAYOR Frank G. Lieb1 �1TT��T: CI TY CL _?Y, htarvi n C. 3runsel 1 � APPOINII�IENT FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - APRIL 1, 1974 CA'IV CODM4ISSION MFl��IBER WHOSE TERM EXPIRID Tom Myhra 6360 Able Street N. E. (H.560-2433) NEW EXPIRATION DATE 4-1-77 OTHER CZIRRENT MQ�II3�RS OF � CATV CON�IISSION NAME TER'�t EXPIRES Father Ecl Chmielewski 4-1-75 Barbara Hughes 4-1-76 John Haines 4-1-76 Dean Caldwell 4-1-75 r � 0 � I:��7�if`f��i ui�lul: : CLAIMS GENERAL LIQUOR . �y 35117 - 35270 8754 - 8785 � LICEN5�5 TO BE APPROVED BY THE CI'I`Y COUNCI� AT TH� ME�TYNG OF ApRIL 1,�1974 TYPE OF LICENSE - NEW FOOD ESTABLISHMENT 7 - Eleven Store 1315 Rice Creek Road Fridley OFF SALE BEER 7 - Eleven Store 1315 Rice Creek Road Fridley BY APPROVED BY FEE James F. McConnell Health Inspector $ 8.30 (pro-rated) James P. McConnell Public Safety Director, 15.00 Health Inspector � �, � � ' � � = "�� � •,i � ' ' I � E�' �1�� �� ��'l���y �'� AT TME TOP OF THE TW�Hi r �.. ��� 4-------� GOaINUNITY �EV�L�fd�yT WY. � 1 � �ROTL�CT�YB f�l;ii�=CT�C�1 C:i�'f, � � �"'� : CtTY H�LI. V:11�L�Y 0��3 1.._.Jti.: ., a{2-��0-30�0 A. Nam� of Appl icant : s�`S Addzess ; �%3 �.� %; B. Ownexship of Txailer; T t�� 910 - F9 . A � Expiration Date : C,.C,n�t � , ��� ,� l�%7�,5 HOUSE TRAILER APPLICATION 0 � I 1/31/73 I 1 1 I 800 C. Description of Trai�.er (Maka and✓S�ze); C/�r,����� J��%� �.5�'` �. Name of 0 Address; �. Period of Ti�e Trailer is to be Stored or Occupied: / +__`___ F. Use of Trailer: ...i`�l- ��� �.�-c►E'��-..-..� . � G. Signatures of Adjoining ProperCy Owner� Granting ppproval: / v" /'` H. Locatioa o� Trai.lex on Pxoposed Pz'opErty {Attach Plot Plan of Property): /(/✓� I: �Wh�ra Txa ilex ia to b�- OccupiQd, Wh�xt is : 1. Relatianahip b�kween Trail-er Q�.an�r and Land C�.�ner: 2. Na.mes and .�ss of A17, pccupants ; L��� ��.�e.- �,? .u��• /? �� � 3. Facilit�es k'ar SeWage pisposal, jdater and Elec�ricity: �.� ��-- A. �" �,(J�-C'���L-� /� �� i' `�. '�/`>/�- l� o r?� , ! -•-1 � Ths Application, when pxeaented ta the City Council shall ehow tha recommendation of the Zon:ing Administxa�or and/or Building Inspectox. Please find attached check in th� smount of $7.50 for park �1g,�$25.00 for occupyin� a hause �rY�1er. � . � „ ,. 1 ( APProv�d �ys , , .� o _ 3/� 7 PP} ic• �C Dak� ��'� l.�Z�c�Pti � lir.� � Recei.pt No. � � %d�3tS"% License No. 0 ESTIMATES FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - APRIL 1, 1974 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Comstock � Davis, Inc. Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road "3" Minneapolis, �Ii.nnesota 55432, � PARTIAL Estimate #13�for Water Improvement Project No. 111 from February 4 through March l, 1974 PARTIAL Estimate #2 for Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 114 from , February 4, 1974 through March 1, 1974 Lee Electric Company 3775 Highway 52 Robbinsdale, Mi.nnesota 55522 PINAL Estimate #S for Electrical Contract for Fridley Off-Sale Lic{our Store , � $ 282.15 $ 6,945.62 $ 3,465.97 rj� , A� �PLiCATION FOR PAYMENT . No. s �ATE r4arch 20 ,19��MMT' � � �. A - To P�1TCH-ERICKSO^1-MADSON & HANSON, ING , �wNtrc, FINAL � This Application is for_�Sth payment for E�P. Ctx'� CSZ work done on your FRIDLEY OFI+' SALE LI�UOR STORE projectfrom 12�26�72 to Ju1���1�197� , � DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT WORK ITEMS CONTRACT COMPLETED COMPLETEO BALANCE APAOl1NT THIS PER{OD TO DATE TO FINISH . l. Service �3,000.00 -0- 3,Q00.00 -0- I� � s 4 00 00 -0- 4 00.00 -0- 2. Fixture ,9 • ,9 � 3. P•Rotors 1, �100. 00 -0- l, �00.00 -0- � � 4. Branck 3,295.00 -0- ' 3,295.00 -0- � 5. Fire Alarm and Intercom 2,200.00 -0- 2�,200.00 -0- ' 6. 7. � 8. Parkin� Lot Li�;hting Adder-Chan�e Order E-2 Parkin�; lot ligntin� �794.47 Dor-O-T�Iatic automatic door openers. E-1 $442.00 � I . ; . , ; ��'����{�`jp`'�+-)����. : t �4�-�-V�^:+4�.iL tR" � %a•J . � v���`;R *, � .���,� . ��TCy �>;g�+��,.',"�:: e::�%4�bfYr f�e�`d � � ' ]" '.='a-.--.�.n.,j �y} '7 v� r n �a _ .__ ax...� � �„�,,_"�� f� . � �.^•. [., �� � FtL �=" " � � � �� , - �� � Original Contract Totals Add Change Orders. Totals Deduct Change Orders Totals Totals to Date , CERT1FtCATE FOR PAYMENT Based on our observations, this application for payment is correct to the best of our knowiedge, and the contractor � is entitled to the indica d payment .............. i ;' _------ Project checked by 2.... � This form checked by -� 1•_��'711.� �/'L - P CH ERI SON MADSON, INC. ,� A HITEG !�!� PLANNE178 �' ���� � 1 ''' � gy Date 1,200.00 -- I 1 � ; i � � 1 t i i ��� .:i.�� � � 1,200.00 0 n„ i -fri,� .`�,f � :r�7:�' i �� ��u::; „ : 4.:iC : �✓ r� �i'`- �_..,._ ...d..r_ ;j--...e.."--..... ty�',��c, p �� ,. � „� I``.I�_"`7_'- � 1�a7:'�. 3 1 � 1 —v— Less Retainage at °� — Total to be Drawn to Date �' ], 2 1� Total PreviouslY Certified 13 765.50 Amount Now Due .� s � _�,465.Q7 This is to certify that al� work listed above has been completed in accordance with contract doc and that all lawful charges for labor, material, etc., for which previous certificates have been have been paid. , -r � C/ � �:.�'�^ _._ r LJ ' _ _: a _ � �— .__� _ _ t � � �F . � . AFFTDAVIT FOR RELEASE OF RETAINAGE SSABrJG?.� SURr"�y C0.1Ptu'�Y ;v��v �ork, Ne;: Yo�l�: Gentlemen: s � • � � uB Date : Janu�+rv ?..3,, 197Q rRe: Bond Number - �69E'9� � � PrOj eCt - Elect . Canst . of Dliinici�al L� c2uor Store, Fridley, tdn. 'S�7e hereby request you to consent to the payment of �he sum of �?,�72.;2 , or any part, on our above described contract. and in cor�sideratian oz� your consenting to sam�, ive hereby make the / . follo�•:in� declara�i�ns and agreements: � �� � � ' 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ?. 8. The date to ��rhich we have received paymen�s �or our t�rork done on this contract is Jul�� ,?_� , 19 .7' � including extras or deductions, is��� •'���- . The amount of payments receiv�d by us on said contract to and including our last payment is $1?s?"5'�'� The amount of our current estimate, representing additional ��roric done to � is � 17_z'_�� f_. u=' � • T�ie amou:nt' of our ma -erials and supplies, if any upon site, for c•rhich c��e have not received payments in estimates submitted is $ 3,?_72.?2 . The amount of the retained percentage on said contract �is � ? 5� . ��' � • � If contract is not compleLed, the approximate cost of comaletl.n; it is $ 1��� •�� • The amount oj��ed by us t;o su -contrac�ors and for our own macerials on the ;ob is � -�- . If the cantract is not completed, i� is expected - that same �-rill be completec� on or about the 1� � day of r�j,ru�r�� , 19 7�' . The money received by.usR; in accordance vrith your aansent, will be used exclusively in paying outstanding bills�on �his contract and no other contracts, S�a�e of T'inr.esot? Coun�y o ' � :=e r.n� ^ � n LEF' ELECTRI�C CO. , INC. ' Contrac�or �j►~ - � .�•- ./�''_'!'_z'" ��u/i f.arr•a �, Gntlist fi Pre �3_c3ent � �:. On this. 2�th day of .Tanuar�► ,�-9 7�a , persona�.ly_ appe�red ?�arr�� :'�_���u� st and made oath that tTie above stat.ements are Lrue. • • E��rFi;LY R. JOIiNSON � � 1 � I ( ;� " � � � .¢ 1i_/ Notary (';,:.. ic.�,,,.,;i;, Cc:�rnty, Minn. '� -��1��1_..T.,�.�—.,. � �'–�,� P.ly C�m„i�.�.,;a �::;;iru� r:�; y 24, 1977„ �7 NQSTARY� PUBLIC �. n � � t f G � � � � � � LJ � � � � � � � � J � r � � �� �\`��J U ��J �JV Q ❑ � \J � � � � � � � �n� � �� � � �-= � � � � � ii� ■ � � � �.i.i � ��� c� C� � �� C� � �� L—_`7 �—� O tf7 C� 0 � 1S� .-� N � � s �: � � �� � ts� � .."� c:: ;� ��� �� 6; � t°�.y L�_-,.'�'. ;�= ��� .� ��-� r�'LL� l�.. :_� � � �- �' � � � �� � � � � � � �,� � �-� � � c� � co 0 � .. � H C� � I�larch 29, 1974 Sol Schildhause, Esquire Chief, Cable Television Bureau Federal Coimnunication Coirnr►ission jVashington, D. C. 20054 Dear DIr. Schildhause: The citizens of the City of Fridley have been anxiously awaiting the operation of the cable television system within our cormiunity for sometime no�v. Initial delays were due to the original draft of the City of Fridley's CATV Ordinance. Sut as of September of last year, these problems have been resolved, and the recorrut►enda- tions to the newly amended Fridley Cable Television Ordinance to the Federal Conununications Connnission were in the best interest of the industry and conrmunity. Our concern at this time is that we have received no further correspondence relating to any action from your Comunission. Presently we have been made aware of a challenge to the certifi- cation of Fridley's cable television system from the Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. (KSTP-TV) to the amendmenr of General Tele- vision application for certification of carriage of CBZYI' Winnepeg-I��lanitoba, Canada. The Council of the City of Fridley, at their April l, 1974 meeting unani.mously decided to ask the Federal Corrununications Cammission to grant a certi�icate of compliance at the earliest possible date for our cable television franchise, even if this means that action on the c�uestion brought up by Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. concerning CB��'T certification be delayed to a later date. Thank yau for your consideration, and the City Council and I hope you will be able to supply us with the status. of General Tele- vision's certification as soon as possible. Yours truly, Frank G. Liebl, Mayor City of Fridley FGL/ms .� � � � ' � . ' � , � ' . � , � � � � � ' � `�o,« �,'� ,•. ���s a ;,���` .'z;�.�-.^�.�`; ��+� ww �• vr -�' - � �� ��: STATE OF M(NNESOTA bEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT NO. 5 2055 NO. LILAC DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, MiNN. Ktarch 18 � 1974 14Tr. Idasim LI. Qureshi Director of� Public 6Jorks City oP Fridley 6431 University �lvenue iJ� Fridley� LIinnesota 55432 In Reply Re�er To: 315 C.S. 0207 TH 55 at Plest l:oore Zake Drive (�S� 35� ,I���ississippi Street (CSAH 6) Dear T�Zr. Qureshi : 0 The purpose of this letter is to advise you that v�e have completed � a traific er�ineering study and are in the process of preparing con- struction plans and specifications for revising the signals at these locations. Before proceeding with work on this project� the various maintenance responsibilities snould be reviewed. The existir� maintenance agreement shows that the underground �acil- ities and hardware are maintained by Fridley. It is ielt that it would be beneiicial for the State to assu.r.ie that portion of the main- tenance in order to brin; these maintenance nrovisions in line with those at other signalized intersections on trunk highways. The proposed agreement will p"rovide that a11 maintenance, with the • exception of relamping� painting and cleaning, will be assur!med by the Sta-�e. The exception woul.d �e the re�ponsibility o� Fridley. Power costs to run the system would also be the responsibility of Fridley. «� The costs of reconstructing the signals will be borne solely by the State. 0 -v}�' � � Mr. Querishi March 18� 1974 Page 2 Bids are presently scheduled to be opened for this project in July� 1974. Consequently, please forrvard your decision on our proposal so we can proceed with preparation of a revision to the eooperative agreement� complete our construction plans, and meet the letting date. Sincerely, r �v � �-� � � Dennis Eyler`' Actinb Assistant " District Traffic i:�ineer . Signals & Lighting DRE:kt cc: J. S,ur.dheim - Anoka County {� 0 23 A � � , � � � � � � , .' � • � I �� MEMO T0: FROM: SUQJECT: DATE: Nonorable�Mayor, City Council and City Manager City Assessor Date for Board of Equalization March 27, 1974 24 This is to inform you that the County Rssessor has set May 21st � at 8 P.M, as the date for the Council ta sit as the Board of Equalization. Would you please confirrn this as being a satisfac�:ory date or if impossible to meet on said ciat� to try �;o set up another. Form No. A.F. 4--No:ico to Clerk of Meeting of Board of Revia+K---•*Equaliza;ion. 0��$�i� ��+' ������ �,�������. "�"�"�. BLANK P«°;;c <=s� i'O THE CLE�K O� THE. . . . . . . . Ci ty . . .. .. . . . . . . .. ...4F. . . . _ . . .. . . . Fri d1eY. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . � . .. .. .. . . . . .. ... . . . Anoka. .. .. . . .. .. . ... .. . . .. .. .COUN7Y, t�11NN�SO7A: � NOTICE IS HERE�Y GIVEN, Thar the_2� s t(Tues day ).__ .da� �f ............... . Ma,y ....., X97 f .. ........................ at........8__.._.o'clack._._.__P:.bl., has been`fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of 3,�� t�yL��---*Equalization (�tri+�e oat aael —in your...__._.C1 ty ___ _ for scrid year. This �neeting should be held in �our ofl�ice as pcovided by law. Pursuant to the provisions of 1t-fir�nesota Statcites Section �i4.01, e�ou a:e required to give notice of said meeting b� publication and postinq, not later than ten da�s pr.'or to the clat2 of said meeting. Given under m� hand rhis_....----- .25th.._..• .............d�y of.-----.....__.�.._..._March .:........_............, 197.'�. . � ; :� . ., • ............:..... L�c �� �`� ... `�C....;: .%����L ��-Zr ..... ....... ................ .............................. Cocnty As3aswr � �� • . � Anoka • .......................... ....................................Cocrr.ty, h�fcnr.es,�:cr �AppGes only to ci:ies who.e charter provides for a Board oF Equalization ins!ead of a 6oard oi Review. � , ' r i � ,� . . � �'u SIJBJEC`T : OFFICE OF TI� CITY MAN�IGER FRIDLEY, MINI�IESOTA March 29, 1974 TfIE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER SUBMISSION OF ENVIROIVNIENTAL ASSESSNIENT TO ENVIROIVI�NTAL QUALITY COUi�1CIL REGARDING NORTH PARK PROJECT BY TI� CITY ' - We have met with the Environmental Quality Council staff in regard to the submission of our report for the environmental assessment for � the North Park golf course project. The directions which the City Council gave us regarding the submission of the Brauer Report, Comphre- hensive Plan, and other available data for the environmental assessment Iwill certainly not be sufficient according to the requirements o� the Environmental Quality Council. � �� � , � , � � ' � � In your agenda folder you will f111d 3 pageS of�the oijtline describing the necessary material for the preparation ot the environmental assess- ment to assist the Environmental Quality Council in determining whether an environmental impact statement is reauired on the proposed project. I asstune the Council wants us to comply with the reauirements of the Environmental Quality Coizncil �or the submission of the envirorunental assessments. We are trying our level best at the staff 1eve1 to put the material together.. We hope to have some material available for Council review at the evening meeting of April lst, so if it is satis- factory with the City Council, it will be submitted io the Environmental Quality Council. NMQ/ms � � �`� �� 0 MEMO T0: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager MEMO FROM: Jerrold Boardman, Planning Assistant - MEMO DATE: April 1, 1974 RE: Environmental Assessment Statement Attached is a copy of the environmental assessment s�tatement that was required by the Environmental Quality Council at their March 12th meeting in their evaluation of a golf course at North Park. I�m also enclosing a copy of the Brauer Report and the Comprehensive Development Plan. I will wait for Council approval before I sena out any documents to the Environmental Quality Council. It looks like this item will be considered on their May agenda. Attach.: �;. JERROLD L. BOARDMAN Planning Assistant v � � ' � � � � ' � � � � � � � �I � � ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT 1. Identification and Description of the Actio The proposed use of North Park, Fridley, Minnesota, hereafter know as the action, is for the development of a golf course with supplemental recre- ation use such as snowshoeing, cross eountry skiing, winter nature study, walk- ing paths and other open space recreation. HISTORY: North Park is a 123 acre parcel of land acquired by the City of Frid- ley in 1972 with the aid of a LAWCON grant from the Federal Bureau of Outdoor Recreation and the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the -purpose of developing outdoor recreation facilities to include a municipal golf course and other compatible uses for year-round recreational activities. On February 26, 1973 the City Council of the City of Fridley hired a con- sultant, Brauer and Associates Inc., to do a detailed study to determine the best use of North Park. A citizen group was formed to work with the consultants on a step-by-step basis. In May 1973, the consultants recommended the following: A-. Golf should have first priority on the use of.:the:North Park site tivith the following order of development: - Prepare plans for golf course use including priority acquistion area. - Addit.ional land would be desirable for optimum design and environmental impact. -- Fence that part of the site designated in the plan for golf course development. - Resolve the drainage problem to the north and east, offsite if possible. - Clear the site of debris and begin resa�urce management program. - Begin reclamation of vehicular damaged areas. - Hire a golf course superintendent and begin construction. � g, Fridley should begin immediately to develop a comprehensive program of nature interpretation and outdoor education in cooperation with all of the school districts, Anoka and Ramsey counties, including: - A clear and understandable ur ose for interpretation and education. - Key personnel, both paid_and voluntary. - Critical opFrational elements - progression, provisions and promotion. - Developed and managed resource bases. �, Fridley should take the lead in establishing a municipal or municipal- county joint powers project to develop and manage a coordinated system of resource bases for nature interpretation and outdoor education at: , - Locke-Park /Rice Creek Park/ Medtronic Park - Islands of Peace - Bunker Prairie - Bush Lake - Chain-of Lakes (Lino Lakes) - Carlos Avery . 1 � : -1- � . � � i � �� �' Environmental Assessment Statement _ , D. Nature interpretation and outdoor education should have first priority on the use of Locke Park with the following order of development: - Prepare a plan including additional acreage available to the east for environmental impact. - Acquire additional 6-10 acres on northeast end. - Fence entire site for control. - Move picnic and general park use to the west. - Begin reclamation and management program and introduce wildlife as � habitat is developed and restored. = Construct quiet water areas. - Revise present main picnic shelter to serve as interpretive structure. � On January 21, 1974, in a 4 to 1 vote, the City Council of the City-of Fridley made the final determination that North Park be developed as a golf course with the potential for year round activities of other compatible uses. Also that a nature interpretive program and outdoor education program be � . . developed. to make use of over 150 acres of public park lands presently in its natural state within the City of Fridley. On February 27, 1974 the City of Fridley was notified of the filing of a � petition of 526 signatures with the Environmental Quality Council requesting that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for the proposed use of North Park as a golf course. This item was discussed at the March 12, 1974 Environmental � Qual.ity Council Hearing at which time they required the City of Fridley to prepare an Environmental Assessment of the action. � NEED FOR GOLF COURSE DEVELOPMENT: (As outlined by the Brauer Report) * A distinct void of both public and private golf courses north and east of Fridley. There are only 5- 18-hole public courses and 2- 9-hole public courses east of the htississippi within the 10 mile radius. , � * Majestic Oaks, presently a public course will in the future become a private course to meet the needs of housing development proposals and b� consistent with the large clubhouse investment. � * Coon Rapids is p�resently adding 9 executive holes at Bunker Prairie. * Brooklyn Park is presently contemplating construction of an 18 hole public golf facility. * No additional PUBLIC courses are under consideration within the first tiers of neighboring municipalities. - * The high school golf team presently utilizes� the Daytona Public Golf Course, well outside of the market area. * Population-to-course ratios within the market area indicate a definite shortate of courses to handle the population at present and in the � future (1990 projections). � -2- �� Environmental Assessment Statement * Golf facilities presently utilized by residents of Fridley range from Daytonato Forest Lake and south into the Minneapolis area. * Crowded conditions exist at most all of the public courses within the ten mile radius. RELATION TO STATE AND LOCAL RECREATION PLANS: According to the State of Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Plan of 1968 and the 1969 Executive Summary, there was a deficiency of 35 courses in the Metropolitan region that should be met by the year 1980. The City of Fridley Parks and Recreation Plan, May, 1969 calls for North Park to be used for the developrnznt of a municipal golf course. � -3- � � . Environmental Assessment Statement � ' 2. Description of Environmental Settinq LAND CHARACTERISTICS: The land characteristics of the action site is generally � flat to rolling lowland area with a high water table creating numerous marsh areas with higher land surrounding these areas. The area is drained by county ditch system #17 which is blocked at the southwest corner of the park system by a beaver dam. This dam presently has backed up a considerable quantity of water � (approximately 20 acres). The action property consists of a wide variety of vegetation ranging from marsh land grasses and prairie grasses to upland woods including a considerable stand of Red Oak. The surrounding property contains much of the same characteristics except considerable clearing and filling has taken place to allow for the expansion of industrial and commercial development in the area. WILDLIFE CNARACTERISTICS:� A wide variety of wildlife population has_ been seen in the action area, including a large number of bird sightings. Many small animals have been observed with signs of several, such as deer, beaver, mink, muskrat, raccoon, etc. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS: The City of Fridley presently has a population of 31,000 people with a projected population to reach its maximum growth by 2010 with an expected 44,000 people. The population characteristics are changing with its growth. The average househo1d size is presently 3.65. The most recent trend of the accep�ance of multiple dwelling units as well as the trend for smaller families wi11 see this household size drop. With these changes, the City of Fridley will see a maturing population with an increase in the number of elderly, a more balapced middle group and a decline in school age population. These are the char- �a��;�e r�;i��� cs that wi 11 shape the future pl anni ng for the Ci ty. These characteri sti cs along with economic, housing, etc. can be summed up in the Brauer report for support of increased recreation. A. The market area will experience tremendous growth in the next two decades. B. An aging population wiih increased.leisure time suggests strong need for recreational facilities. , C, The market area population can be characterized as young middle-income families who car� support fee-based areas and facilities. D. A majority of the people own their homes, indicating a stable as opposed to a "suitcase" com►nunity. � EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE CONDITIONS: The proposed action, as public property, is comp ete y surroun e y in ustri�a and commercial property.At the present time the adjacent property to the action site is undeveloped. However much work has been done in the vicinity and considerable clearing has tak�.n place. The action � is within 1/4 of a mile from Northtown Shopping Center which has been classified by the Metropolitan Council as a major regional center (such as Southdale, Brookdale, etc.). With the full development capacity of Northtown as a regional center, there � will be increased pressure to completely develop the surrounding commercial and industrial property. Because of this development capability, there will be sub- � stantial changes in the traffic patterns in the area and with the possible develop- � ment of a North crosstown north of this action there could be possible ma3or road- way overhauling. Presently there is a shopping center development being considered -4- � � . � � � � � r � � � � � � j Environmental Assessment Statement just north of the action across Highway 132 with a projected traffic flow of approximately 10,000 cars per day. With this development, County Highway 132 would be upgraded to a 4-lane channelized highway from East River Road to Truck Highway 47 with a projected traffic count of 23,000 by 1985. The Burlington Northern Railroad two line main track makes up the west boundary of the Action Area. The present railroad traffic using this main line is 35 trains per day or 1 train every 40 minutes. With the total development of their railroad yards, they foresee an increase in the traffic by 1 train per day, per year, so that by 1985 there will be 45 trains per day and by the year 2010 they will have 70 trains per day. � EXISTING UTILITIES: Presently Northern States Power Company and the Metropolitan Sewer District hold easements along the west boundary for a high power electric line and a 72" sanitary sewer line. The sanitary sewer line runs directly below the present beaver dam location and is buried 20 feet below the �urface. A service road must be maintained for these facilities. DRAINAGE SYSTEM: The action area is part of a total drainage area called Spring. Broak Basin which has a total drainage area of 2,034 acres. 561 acres of this total system is within.the corporate boundary of the City of Fridley. The remaining 1.,473 acres drains directly into the action area (including all of Northtown Shopping Center). This total drainage area is only about 35% developed (mostly residential development) and when the total commercial and industrial properties develop, there will be a tremendous strain on the existing system, and could cause considerable erosion downstream unless proper action is taken. � -5- �'� ��� �� � ��� C�ixculation within tlie City is handled by major east-west coni�ector streets called thoroughfares. These streets are designed to serve major local �traffie and provide access to ttie freeways and expressways. Mississippi Street is the most heavily traveled of the thoroughfares and provides a par- ticularly congested area at its inter- section with T.H. 47< This intersection provides the main concentration of com- mercial traffic. The frontage roads empty out onto Mississippi Street here, also causing added congPstion. Missis- sippi Street is presentl.y carrying more traffic than it was designed for and will increase its load by about 35% by 1975. Other thoroughiares that'will be feeling incxeased.loads are Osborne road, 73rd Avenue N.E., 53rd Avenue N.E. and Central Avenue. . �r � r • � r- � .� : � �i_ � I � T � ♦ ��l. ` ♦i�/��/�/ft� �f�f�i��[t/��1 t��,,� �� fit�`` � i �`�,, � � � ► A � I = � --► � ( ; � � . � ; � ---------- --�-. ; , ; � �� . * � � � ! . : ' :�[��/lf!/I�tl�li�i���\[[t�fi�tt/��11I1�1�11 D . � � � � , � . -� �}+ p � 1 r l �� `� f . � ! I A �� � ._..`�� The City of Fridley 'is divided into storm drainage districts .to serve the different watershed areas. Adequate storcn sewer systems have been developed in a greater partion of the C.ity, but there are three areas that are only partially completed. These are; �Spring Brook Basin, Stonybrook Basin and Moore Lake Watershed. These are difficult areas for the City to develop because a large percentage of the drainage comes from areas outside of the City limits. In each case, the City of Fridley is on the dawn- stxeam end of the drainage and, therefore, is faced with tihe bulk of the drainage prpblem. The City has not been successful in getting cost participation agreements with the other communities involved in these cases. 1. Spring Brook Basin has a total drainage area of 2,034 acres of which about 561 acres are in Fridley. The greatest share of this drainage area is in Blaine with 1,130 acxes. This area is not yet fully developed and, therefore, the full drainage , impact has not been fully realized. A regional shopping center has been built in Blaine, just outside of Fridley's boundary, which puts a.tremendous sCrain on the present system. 2. Stonybrook Basin is in the same situatian. Of its total 813 acres, 520 acres are located in Spring Lake Park. 3• Similar problems exist in the Moare Lake W4tershad. New Brighton drains its excess water into Fxidley's system putiting a �txain on �ts present cazrying capacity. • In order to best protect i�s citizens from flooding and other health hazards, the Ci�y is continually upgrading its gres�nt system and making the best use of its natura.l drainageways and ponding areas. - SCHOOL AREA IN °lo IN % OF DiSTRICT AREA FRIDLEY FRIDLEY FRIDLEY 11. 134.9 1.5 1.1 12.5 13 6.5 2.9 44.E 24..2 14 �+.7 4.7 104.0 39.1 16 17.2 2.9 16.9 24.2 SC4�Q�� , E���LLP����T P� w.ss 68-69 se-�o ro-n ��.rx n-rs na� ��.�a raae E! � �� E �TAR�( --...-.,........... �U�IOR NiGH , .............�........... SE����R HIG3� �----°�-- �S���Q�, �AC1�1T1�� �The City af Fridley is divided into foux schoal districts. School Aistric ;��14 is solely within the boundaries of Fridley and has the greatest impact on �he City. The Schaol District has fin .ished all of its new construction and plans now onJ.y for improvement of the existing £aciliti.es. ,In setting up a Comprehensive Plan it is necessaxy Co know the peak paints of enrollment in the school age popu-� t l.ation and be able to project these points �n order to make full use o£ the facilit�es available and to deter- ' mine educational and recreational need, The elementary schools in District ��_G had reached their peak enrollment in the 57-58 school year and have been �steadily decreasing. From the 67-68 ;season to the 72-73 season there will 'be a decrease of 809 elementary age , 'children. This decrease will continue :until approximately the 76-77 season and then will begin to rise to a sec- ond peak. ������������ j ,� Oi�ti�U�iTY �ACil1i1E� �� ` � � S.A�lTARY SE�IER �� Fridley is part of the Metro Sewer �istricti. Local sewage is transmit- .ted from Fridley, through a series of � ,interceptor sewers, to the Pigs Eye treatment plant in St. Paul. � � � � � � � Fridley's sanitary sewer system is fairly complete because of the high percentage of developed lands. How- ever, there are bottle necks and problem areas that need to be correct-� ed within the exi.sting system. It is also important that the City pro.vides additional lines for new gro��th in areas that are�presently undevelaped. or have i.nadequate lines for their , type of use. � The City is cQntinuaZly striving for � �health safety and quality service for thP protection o£ the citizen�as well as the enviranment. For this reason, the City has develop�d a Cam�rehen�ive Sanitary Sewer Plan adopted by the City Counci_1 on January 22, 1973 It assists the City in planning for future needs and keeps pollution of the natural resources to a rninimum. This plan will work in conjunction with the overall Comprehensive Plan to better serve the City by directing local improvements accozding to devel-- op�nent policies and growth potential of the City. " � �ro��� ����� � � � � � � . Th.e prevention of possible flood damage is the primary purpose of�' providing storm sewers. Rain or sur- face water is .co� l.ected and carried by the storm sewers to lakes, rivers or st�eams. Storm sewers are utilized to supplement the natural drainage system in urban areas where buildings and widespread paving materials pre- vents the normal absorption of surface � water by the ground. . . ���;��:� ������� i : � � Oi��IU�iTY FA���.������ti �.. � , SPRING Ll�KE PARK -- -�- — - -- - I � i ��Al���� P����.E�3 .A���S i� i .. � ; 1 �. t � R20�EC � 23 �''`- ' : � ' ' �NQ, I � � , � ��., '� �� � Rtcpo��a \. INDNSYR�AL. � �'\ � SNappiNCrC�n+TC�AR�. D \\ • t32 -•�••- !1 � t'� . „'1 oy µ 41 t;� '.� U � a ��� !, � ,� . .� � c,� � �, " � �� taL�`� �� �",�,;���''� ��,����`'���•. p .�\ �,3� �� �° �"'� J � �1 �,'�i �T �:i�t 3 � � �J `� `�' ,. ��7 � 6cc.\� c��� � (,' v f, �� � ��<3E'3 � � 9 � ;� 7� � � �\` ,�������,,�,�W�''';���;���`�9����"'�''� ."\� 4 � � U� `�� ��� � �� � � � � � $ � � � N � � � .� _� � � `� ' `� . , � 9 �°, .1 ,rn:r+i y • .� � � '� � � �'� � ? J�-^ � � `' �, , u\��.` � � iJ y� `;.) � NORTN�' PARK 4'� � '�J '3 � "'J �J� IN�JtJSTR1A{... � \��, � � � �������3~��'��� � �1 � 't� a :;, J �' � c^' �J3� ,� � ��•a±� �,���9�� `)J:i�3`��'3���.�'��� �a�•��� ,,�° � C� '��?'� ���'���� 1 � 9 f`�' : � � + � y �� � � ',J � �a m �.a �. �� :��, � .:��,�,� _�: � � � �� � ,� � �, �� .; w p; .� � - � � ) s ?� � � `"�1 � � `=� "'� �'� tl < r� '� �:s 4''� U l4 •a ) a `Y v� �i ;� 'f ,�? ; ., ; :� � � oP r,,-„r,cn.o �k (�, c:i� � �• ( o��91e. � w' f :�r' BSRO. wVf. ME. " �'`d`'z?r�'=, i ���irl�zi"rrzrh�z�n�Z��tizri�la�.��--- — _ � I ��on .w . .[f ���YI lY " '. � � � /}`�/��, 11'�n��isi�i►.� ;'�-'•,,.�--N�p � ��t.,zTostY Sew� ; .��o ,..«. � �e Y� '�1� �o5�N1�NTg � ....� � �- c�� : D ��� �' ��.,,�� :., � �riaQ.E Q J� � I c��C�t ..[ �MNK � � � � W � �� '< ;, l � Q� � --- . 4;71 .�. ._. ry ���, � � �\� �F{ky� N v „�� . ,- . � y I o - i= ;, , _ �, .o..R�, ;.. � � 79iH •� • o � O ;�h � . i\ � � . . �r � �� �.. � � �• ' , � � —s IlA N t »xn �o�/ � � ` 6�aT �vE. ME. �vt. 3 ; �{ �e.voa �,,, ° Ili � - ,','��''�� ��, ` ri . e�ro.� � � `� ��� ` ae.nw• I � � r��� �.r \�:, o. 1.RU. �3TH avE �,,1 �rt. `� :�C- O b i:��� `p ��/'-7!�,�' II 'J� ��R%, / \�n� '� iN ���.},,� ��\ ` �^ �I, I�. II I _.� II � � � �Ifl Q . 'Mti . 0 n 0 4 - - .� ? �� ``� a ��.0 ` d' � �:.:i.: � '•t. . ,/ ' ���,-'-'`,— __C� '_--� `: i �..._' .�s__ � � _ _ ' ` � � �C ._:.�. M . I � �' ..� T�:: �� ----.�,.�-�- f 1 �; :� :L � .�. i � '^'� , . . .. • � �" s' < � '?; : �t i Y '� �--��i,,,,..' � 4 f s s :I � ';? I ..t r y k -� � •x � e-,cr n Y� �--y£rx- � F ^•�cisE _ � fl . . . � . � s' r�x �, - C # �- - -a � � 1 �.��� ' � ... •t ft3 � ��� � � � �� '. i -: .� � � h^ !-'�� `,_ . � I Y.pJ�- �i-, S hd�c.�) ' • � �'���t`±C ,'�t �� � . �., ��� .� ^ �..J �F; „"?�. Y 'Ap.' T . i � ,.�'FLn �� ,�; � ��` � V ' • �� ;> F�.� , ; _ g '� �;i � �N . � ., - —'. - ._ � - � � �'; ^• � . � �j . �I R a � .���w-�3 a i v4 �� � `.a�,s� � : � J �' �� -�,y.t'"+ .� ,E� � . : � , r � .�6' y V n� / '��j ,� � c+�[ � t: ..:>�' + ° i «�„s� �' �y � ��� � '°°"�?�, t � � t \ .f� � i; !"`v ^_�' i `^Z - •Ma +i# F'• / I���f.y� L.� �! ..: �; 4 � �■ �cta���'� ; /±,. . .:.. ... . .. ��.� . � i � .. :: wT �`•�'�`'': h,/�� :::':. ^� y, {�..�'�',,,,,,,zf� �• t1 '" / _ ��'� �.:�.. :._ `� •,ey " raee�,:$ � �� A� 3 i • �•� �r'� ��� � ( �i �'�` J�� � i { � ��-' .� '.,st:��f� e''s � �cr`;:� 71- k � �r � li - - ,��k 1� e � •�,_,��=`�-.- ` � � �� � - Sof ��7.- �F � t f ��i` �9�� rr: �-�+': .-� : �.:'�.i /� c.�..-Y-�-` ` �' y x"-l�j. �� ._.c•y �+ ?�`i0�wd� �•. �c- J . i � �'-� ��.( �: tr4 '� � �^-�"-� [� ,s� 'N ��::� °� � .I � � �� y1 � C rt s. iI. q'� Lr. �T ..i��# .,� �-. ���- t d� `' a Av.� � �� 1 � `.i A L�' � .:+ S� �', � `I �� 1 � 5 � -M r, �::" #� ai 5 �3,t z. t 'i� '�-: J - s� c � � Y -c e �.a �•� �� � ��- � � �s�' 7`'/ � � �__�_ �� __.�_.__ ��� 4 _ai i ` ' � �-.. � �•r.t�w.-�..': • ,+', .++^: .3'i' �. - '':: �C. �.*�se.++,�.i ��' - � • '�., ^y"`�.�.:�a,X..: `"�,.,.�.y.—.:w'""', qi`Xti'�i.`: :;Gw""`�;.� ° "� � ���avN����A��` .�� y j I � � • ° ---=�"�, Q w `' u-' a a 0 o� �N i-- N � U Z °O� W � ~ W } � J Z � � , U U Y Y aa .: iI x W � � J � _ Z' J 'S_' v_ � � q J � � � � J J U �OJ� J � Q ¢ �a � � ,Q W O O ZF►- a u —�v� -'.�t y�1w� WF V W� F"' J�H�jJ¢Z fA �WjOZWWW VI wK]EU_�¢$ � o �����a � "j \ Q UJ lJ � Y� � � � � t? � 18 \� aY 3 28� �� ♦Se `.`" � �.�.> � L � Joh� ille � 59 32 � O 8° � �. MAIN 5T. ZQZ �8 / 14 M�IN ST.� {�ZSTN ANE.) � ST. 1 1250� 92 � � � , � �� " '� , �; tl .�..1_` 9� I 11 < I • \ ���•�,f�.� 8 121ST.AVE. N.W. 5I � �,.,.� oa• �� � � _ as -tL � ta3 esi —�� ��r , � � ', �� at 80 41 `OJ� � � � � ( Yi "c:- 11 ,...�� _ 41 / �11 �7 M\ AVE. N. E. � ` 11 � .. . . T � _ f . 3� � ,.�, ,t ,C� 11 N� �' `� Ii700 � 4i � ei — ^ ° � � as x� o Q�HO �� 39 � � R � s ��4ZO �� i 0 15 ,�� '`F � � i� 4t ^ .'\r BLAINE � t3 Z5z I� i�t �3 �lLO 39 �t ' O�h� POP. 20.635� �� 3� Y W� i.y3;62) 1 f o � b o , 8 ����V1V� m _ ID9TH �VE. �2 N.E. � � P' — _f _ — —i �� -� R► ID�� 12-- �,�0900 � , 4, + 5� <, �-T� � r� � - � /�� . L � P�P. 30. � i: � T \ I ' r�ft� _� � 32 . ` � �� . 23� iQ �- � 99 % G I f � � � , . ' � T it J . e�yo j yo > 19 R_ II` 1 :� � o „s3�azii j �� < 47 �- z � �� � � 3� '� / .��. . � � WAII RD./� 1 � �, �-. t�aooi. W . j� �`* 4-4� �'`�,, j � (� LEXI GT' Ol� �5 y' No�rM '� R� � 27 1� � � 3P `� ', � 'v v ,azs � ; - _ �G�n . St, � � „ � JANE 5 , � -� � / ,n -1 � ��. ,.�. �;;:ek 29 ��FlELD � 27 � �'---�----•- p=> Cl I � "w -- ��' � �- �=' 11 ' 25 � � � � � taNOK C�UNTY 6liRP T) , �( POP. � , � 20 t,���{ 1 �,�'J (930Q) � tT a, �1 lo '� � - �� " " � ��. �� � X r's� :�U � '�� Tivt`IN �,,�i � t / �\ iT / � 41 — 1 � � �' � 2.3 � .��.w � ISLA 5 � �j � °^ ^` Nu I � - .;�'`�_, f � � � � � i"< %` �Goldei Y :.��:� .� �. , s i z , �� � R 24 W a � I � _� L �� 35 �, i p � � 37 ,�, � , � - - � f � y� .� , �=• . � �{ Lc�die � � a``� ,�- 1% ' e `j �. .a.c t� �� � �r • 32 '�r�ey 1; a _ t�'�.,� I � w. � �..� ;" -`' ` ..-,P � .. .. � ...... . . # ` ..��4. - ,�,� �� .. Q � <� ,, .. --�. , • , � � SPRIN� �- i ti _ ,� � r ,.. .. } C __ � �, ' ., �.i � �o � � $siaND �` r' LAKE, io i � ���; ` ' s`S. . � �_ Q � � 9 � •• � : �� PAR � `• . --' � �� } � � ; _ e � � Y� s--� , r � c 3 -_ - � . L 35 �,� � �� O Q PO?.631fl � p �`� - w,«.., �t � ��.a- • �.. .a� " i77Q� . � i- '�r1 � --� . . . i �o <; 8 ' 1 `_�� i�.+� ,�a �°'°'�t` ! A � � i � u � N MOUNDS '- .:. _.:.._... r^ ' ./1..7 -}. �r VIEW j _ __ . .. _._..:.:, � . � s i urairv a+os 65 "' "" BROOKLYN "� 11 g ,' S • � •`°"I` _ - +� `� PARK � � r a �l �7 M. j �q a ,� } "�-�G� R}'9 � 4 ;: .�j` r -�' � '� 'L �6—e -1 T � '�.`,�r„�.°�""`.:�'..�- 's~,,��'� . i � � „a! t' �� ° w��:;� � �4.,�>�m r � n '� ' L�,Y �" � ;4 . � ,� 1 � ~ �..� ��S ""`�te f� . 6 . PoP.:a.2ss� 13 ] 4 �' t- �� :- � �� �o �A; H� u• :�.-1 - � � - ' �y �:� ` . «- __ . ..� a5�05� i 6 ' �° ' � �_ � 6 �� < < ► .:: ::: �.k.� D ��M�+ Moore c iQo) f " _ _ _ '^ --; Z R-uah � • ]ia n ,L��ke' "` 35 t� , f.•k< r.,.; � 169 � . � < ���f ��� '� 5 �5 Uk� � . � �,..: " � � 23 �:.�` 1� ' _ _ - � � To Jct. U.S. 52 & T.H. I52 �� 6�1 . �� ; �* , _ .::. � � 94 —� -� � � r;�.. - _ _ _ � _ O 169 �, �' 1� `-�-�"'"" 7 c.x. �" �i= K 3001 i. ����� � � : ' �� : � �' ' � �'------ � -, - i �r ...... U �� 5 17 94 � o � . - � :�w„«.� � tj 27 I q o �:•.� �1 « i - � 4 #� ` =1..k. �, � ' �' � ' , $ROOKLYN � I � � : ta� 1 - sv '� � n q- '`i 25 • BRIGH N�� �,j / �� � I si .a...a .� :� .l. � 1 � CENTER � a TI��-''-� 4 �: � E t r� � . ,C. e:� � � � , ._ � ror. �of� ( 500) . � b . „ - _ 15LU MBT �; • ; . �,' . ! HEIG HTS C!�---� � " � — 2 ror. sa,vo> � �>. ��_ r�,..r.•' � :.�' 'S�1ver',�=� � ,�„ z l ,, � �� ,, . � ' � L � ` , . ; �oo) � � „ �, � . i Soo ! ��., s"' j:; f 65 � - 3 - .. , . � 41 u. R 24 W • � � Environmental Assessment Statement 3. Probable Impact of the Proposed Action AIR QUALITY: There will be no adverse environmental effects on the quality � of the air with the devclopment of a golf course. Any potential effects will come with the total d�velo pmen t of the surrounding commercial and industrial property. GROUND WATER RECHARGE CAPABILITY: There wiil be no potential for significant environmental impacts on the ground water. The runoff factor for composit areas (which includes parks and golf courses) is very low with a 0.10 factor on a 1.0 scale for total runoff. This factor could run even less over the total property due to the.fact that not all of a golf course is grass. (Information from State Highway Drainage P�anual) Ponding areas will have to be provided to control increased storm water runoff from the �djacent areas which will act as filtering basins and water recharge areas. � SURFACE WATER: The surfacQ water that presently exists would have to be ' reponded to fit golf course design. This, however, will have very little effect on the water quality or the potential for ground water recharge. The physical characteristics should keep pretty much the same with the revegetation. of the ponds. Chemical: In a discussion with Dr. Don White of the University of Minnesota Soils Sciences, he said there shouldn't be any adverse effects to the water quality due to the use af fertilization if the fertilizer practice is handled properly. In recent studies by Dr. Farnam on fertilization on sod farms it did show no difference in water quality on runoff. Runoff: Runoff of the action (as stated previously) will have a very minimal effect. However, runoff coming into the area will be a very major concern. The system as it presently stands will not be able to handle the full impact of the drainage as surrounding development continues. Control measures on the site as well as off the site will be needed for the protection of downstream erosion. In controlling this situation, the cooperation of the surrounding eommunities will be necessary. VEGETATION: The action will�have significant environmental effects on the vegetation due to the disruption of the natural succession of the Anoka Sand P1ain.that is taking place there. The action would require some clearing of the existing vegeta- tion for the construction of fairways and.greens. The action would however, preserve as much of the existing characteristics as possible and provide a planting and management program to maintain a natural characteristic which is important in golf course management. FAUNA: As with the vegetation, there will also be alteration to and possibly removal of many species of wildlife habitation. The disruption of the successtion of the vegetation will definitely change feeding patterns and remove many of the migrant and present inhabitants of the area. It would be�poss�ble that a number of bird species and small mammal species that are more adaptable to change would remain. However, the action area makes up only a small part of the present overall ecosystem in which the fauna exist. Disruption of this ecosystem is presently taking place with encroaching commercial and industrial property and could drastically change the present habitat of the wildlife. Also uncontrolled trail bike dam�,ge and unconcerned dumping has already displaced wildlife in some areas , -6- . � � , ' � � , Environmental Assessment Statement of the action site. NOISE: The action has no potential �or significant environmental effects. The noise that will be pr�duced will come from development around the action area. (Rail traffic, highway noise, industrial and commercial noise). LAND: Erosion - Action would be better suited for erosion control than for causing erosion to take place. WETLANDS: The action would _h�Ye some effect on the pre�ent.wetland � characteristics of the action area. They would probably liave to be arained and reshaped to fit the design for a golf course. However, the reshaping and reponding of the wetlands will still be able to provide the basic function of a filtering basin for collecting silt and organic material and reduce peaks by serving as storage�area for storm sewer runoff. It will also provide needed storage areas for grourd water recharge. However, the draining and reshaping of the wetlands will disrupt vegetation and fauna habitats. PARK LAND RECREATION: The action will provide the needed variety of recreational � activities. Estimated usage figures brought out in the Brauer report shows that the action would produce a high use recreation area. � CAMPATIBILITY OF USES: The action is very compatible to the surrounding uses and in fact enhances the area by providing visual relief, recreation facilities in high commercial use areas, for ease access and public exposure. � , � , � 0 I � � AESTHETICS: No potential for significant environmental effects. SOCIO-ECONOMIC: No potential for significant environmental effects. Public Health and Safety: Action will not be detrimental to the Public Health and Safety, in fact it will promote the public health through its recreation facilities. Conformance with Plans: The action conforms with the City's comprehensive park plan, comprehensive land use�plans and zoning regulations as well as the open space recreation requirements for which it was purchased. � -7- � i � �� � � � �J � .� � � � " Environmental Assessment Statement 4. Unavoidable Environmental Effects A. Disruption of the existing vegetation succession (as discussed). B. Disruption of the animal habitat (as discussed). 5. Mitigation of Environmental Effects VEGETATION: Although disruption of existing vegetation success is inevitable with the developme-nt of the action, it is possible to still preserve a natural environmental surrounding through the use of proper vegetation management and . control. This would also allow for the reversing of some of the damage that has been done by the uncontrolled use of trail bikes and the unconcerned dumping of trash that has taken its effect in.the area. Wetland management and wetland vegetation should be a part of a good golf course design to allow for areas of small animal habitats that are�most abl�e to adjust to a change in environment. This vegetation management should not be overloeked in any open space function and should provide some mitigation of the effect of change on the environment. ANIMAL: The disruption of animal habitats is unavoidable with the development of this action. The main animal population that wo.uld be affected by this change would be the migratory population that depend on a vast area for its habitat. (Any changes in its system would cause changesin its habitat). The present encroachment of industrial an� commercial development and expected increase in street develop- ment, automobile traffic and population usage of the area, has already•.st�rted io take effect on the overall ecosystem of the migratory animals in this area. This dis- ruption will increase in the near future. It is possible however, to maintain a certain amount of the small animal population that is most adaptable to change by developing vegetation management and protectian areas (described previously) which could possibly be worked into a golf course design. , � � -8- 1 L_� , � ' � � ' �J � , ' � � , , , Environmental Assessment Statement 6. Conclusion MAJOR ACTION OF MORE THAN LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE: The action was first initiated through the use of LAWCON funding fcr tre purchase of recreational open space for the development of the golf course. The project was given its priority only because of the golf course deficiency as set by the 1968 Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Plan and the need for the facility in the North suburbs. As a golf course, the action would satisfy LAWCON grant requirements for projects of regional significance. The action would provide recreation open space for a large segment of the northern suburbs with a possib]e market area of 10 miles with prime focus on 5 miles (as set by the Brauer Report). In this sense of the project it would have more than local signifi- cance. However, much of the benefits provided by such an action would have direct �i=Qni`f.�:�ance for the 1 ocal uni t of government, as outl i ned by the Brauer Report. "A.munic;pal golf course facility has various inherent qualities to offer a community. ' * Open Space-- A golf course within any community should be classified as a part of an open space system. It offers visual and physical relief and freshness to developed areas, i.e., structures, roads, etc., and is there- fore an asset �ttracting people to the community. * Recreational Facility--Recreational use, the primary function of a golf course, is important to any community. The area can offer varied recre- ational activities besides golf, which might include tennis, court games, a swimming pool, winter and summer trails, and picnicking. These additional park activities are dependent on careful planning, adequate space, economic status, as well as land developability. * Social--A golf course has inherent social qualities. The clubhouse facility can be a meeting place for neighborhood and community functions. The records and achievements of many citizen golfers provide personal associ- ation with the faciiity. * Identification-Image=-Most courses organize and sponsor golf tournaments which usually recei�e multi-media publicity. As a result, the course becames a promotional asset of the community. * Seasonal Use--A course need not be limited to use from Anril through October. During the win er months activiiies such as cross-country skiin,g and snowshoe-° ing, jogging, �ature observation and int�rpretation, and continuing social • functions can make use of the area and facilities. *. Property Value--Land adjacent to or near a golf course is more desirable and often more valuable. On a long-term basis, a course preserves and enhances the value of the neighborhood. As a result, property tax.revenue is gener- ally maintained at a consistently higher ievel over a period of years. * Education--A golf course in the community allows schools to offer golf instruction, enter interscholastic competition, introduce intramural pro- grams, as well as fitting into the community recreational program. * Retirement--Senior citizens' should not be isolated from the younger members � of the recreational community. Today we need to plan for the active senior citizen.. Golf allows a mix of ages, physical exercise in which any person -9- � � C_� Environmental Assessment Statement can participate at his or her own pace. It is one of the few recreational facilities which can be used by all ages at any time. � * Revenue--The aim of most municipal courses it not profit, but with increasing play, many public courses in the metropolitan area do produce surplus monies. This surplus could be used for other recreational programs, ' supplement the general fund, pay for recreational facilities, or be used for future golf course improvements." ' P07ENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: As stated previously, the two basic effects of the action would be the alteration of the plant succession and the habitat alteration of the existing animals. These, however, could not be classified as having a potential for adverse environmental effects due to the � character of the surrounding properties and the potentiai damage to both of these . iiabitats with the outside disruption of the ecosystem that this project will have no control over. The social benefits that this action would provide would far �� outweigh the adverse environmental effects that would eventually take place with the total commercialization of the surrounding properties. The action would be compatible to the surrounding land uses by providing a visual relief in a heavy commercialized area, the traffic patterns and improved road systems would provide easy � access and maximum visual contact which is impo�tant to a successful golf course. It would not be adversely affected by the encroachment of the industrial and � � r , commercial development, but instead it would be benefited by providing the exposure of a regional shopping center. Tt is providing open space for a variety of recre- ation uses that is important for a growing population and an increasing amount of leisure time. This increase in leisure time is showing up mainly in those age groups that utilize the facilities the most. It would provide additional revenue to the City for the purpose of expanding and improving recreational opportunities to its residents. It wi11 provide an identification or an image for the City and provide an inducement for better comm�rcial and industrial developments. These developments would benefit the community through its increased tax base� with which other worthwhile commur�ity projects could be funded. � These, and other benefits that the a potential for desirable environmental . that is already being damaged. .� � � � � , -10- action would provide, would definitely be effects and could improve an an area Environmental Assessment Statement 7. Recommendations � It is the recommendation of the City of Fridley that an Environmental Impact Statement not be required for thE: following reasons: A. No new information will come out of an environmental impact statement � .._ that hasn't already been presented to tFe Environmental Quality Council by both the petitioners and the City of Fridley and any further action would be unnecessary delay and increased cost to the residents of the City of Fridley. Therefore it is requsted that action be taken on the � information available. • B. The action does not have the potential for adverse environmental effects for the reasons stated in the assessment. C. The determination should be based on the effects of the action only and not on a comparison of alternate uses. The final determined usage should not be a determination of the Environmental Quality Council but rather a determination by the City of Fridley. , � �11� 0 � . , � ' � ' ' C_� � � � ENVIRONb1ENTA� ASSESSMENTS An environmental assessment (EAj is a brief review of the potential impact of a given action on the component parts of ihe enviranment. Its purpose is to assist the Environmental Quality Council (EQC) in det2rmining ►vnether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) shall be required on the proposed action. TIP�IE If a petition is received pursuant to P-1�QC 14 requesting an EIS on an action, the EQC sha]l, within 45 days, direct the preparation of an EA. In all other cases under which an EA might be prepared, there is ro specific i:ime �iimit tivithin which EQC must direct the preparation of the EA. Once the EQC has directed that an EA be przpared, the preparer has 45 days to complete the EA and submit it to EQC. If the EA is not prepared upon direction of EQC, but rather is pr�epared ugon a decision by a proposer or Responsible Agency io do so, the EA must be submitted to EQC �lithin 45 days aft�r notice was given to E�C of the decision to prepare the EA. This 45-day period may be extended a single time for 15 days. The EQC must act uoon an EA within 45 days. If EQC reviews an EA and finds it inadequate, the EA is returned to the preparer for revision. The r�vised EA must be resubmitted within 30 days. Upon r�ceipt of the revised EA, EQC again has 45 days to review it. If the EQC fails to review an EA within the prescr�b�d 45-�ay period, this constitutes acceptance of thz recomnendation of the prep�rer of the EA as to whether or not an EIS shall be required on the action. THE PREPARER � An EA can be prepared by the proposer of the action; by EQC's staff; or � by any other public agency that has some form of jurisdiction over �he action. Under no circumstanc�s may �he Council require a proposer of a private 'I � action to prepare his own EA, althougn the Council can so direct �'ts otivn staff or a public agency. ' � � ' � � Normally ihe Council will designate a public ag°ncy as the Responsible Agency when the Council directs the.preparation of an EA, and that Responsible Agency will prepare the EA. In sorre cases a proposer may elect to preoare an EA without the Council having directed its preparation and designated a Responsible Agency. For exampie, a proposer of a private aczion may perceive the near certainty thai an EA «ill be required on the proposed action, and may ti��ish to prepare the EA himself so as to expedite the review process. In such a case, the E,4 shail be reviewed by the locai unit of government having jurisd:ction over the project, 4rnich iriay revise the EA as it sees fit. The EA will be submitted via the local unit of government to the Council. t�ilier� a proposer elects to prepare an EA upon his own decision, he shall notify the Chairman of EQC by letter of his intention to do so. He should also notify the Chairman a�hen the EA has been completed. �� , ' ii �: PAGE 2 CONTEP�IT The Environmental Impact Statement Regulations, section MEQC 13.A, specify tY�e cont�nt of an EA as follo+�vs: 1. Identification of the action 2, Description of the action and environmental sett�ng 3. Probabie effects of the action on the environment 4. M�tigaiion of adverse effects 5. Conclusion as to wnether: a. The action is a major governmental action, or a , private action of more than local significance; b. The action ha� th� potential for significant � � � � � L� major envi ronrrental effects . 6. Recommendations as to wh�iher or not an EIS should be prepared. 7he Identification of the Action should identify the person or a�ency proposing the action, identify the type and magnitude of the action, list �11 final d�cisions to be made by governmental ag�ncies on the action and the status of these final decisions, identify the person or agency submi�ting the action, and specifically explain �rhy the EA is being prepared. The Descript�on of the Action and Environmental Setting should not only describe the action, but aiso identify the location of the action (ma�s Oi drawi ngs ii�ay be �iZ� j��U� �, diid u'ei,di i i.il� �'t'GNv'��u � iiiiz �d`u i� 0 i G'��@� �NiiiCii �. The environmental setting in the area �to be afrected by the action should be described briefly, including such items as t�oqr__a_phx, demogra.hy,,iand use, water resourczs . present, vegetati_on, ��ii l dl i � e�_ soi i c�,aract_e_ri sti_cs,_ - - +etc: �Any publ i c park and recreati on ] ands ,��ii 1 dl i fe and t�taterfowl refuges or historic sites ti�at are pro;cimate to �he location of -che action shoul� be noted. The aspects of the environmental seiting described herein should �� generally confin�d ta ihose �acets tnat may be changed or otherwise affected by the proposed action. �' , 7he Probable Efrects of the Action on the Er.vironment is the gist of the environrrental assess;,�eni, and is crucial to tne decision whether -to require an EIS o� tne project. 1'he likely iirpac�s of the acticn on bio�ogical, physical, � chemical, social, econonic, and cultural factors should be ass�ssed. Aithoun,h ber�eficiai or neutral environmeni�l effects can be included to impart perspectiv�, major empnasis shou7d be on adverse im,�a�ts. l�engthy study and precise quantification oT�erivironmental impacts are the function o� the EIS; , in c�eneral, the EA should concentrate on dei�ermining ti��hether the potential for significant environmental`effects does exist: , The action should be checked asainst the following list of environmental parameters. This is not to say �that th° impact of the action with r�spect to each parameter should be investigated in detail; that would be tantamaunt � to preparing an EIS. Rather, �the analys� should concentrate en those paramet2rs fior which there is a potential for "significant environmental effects." � � � ENVI20PlN1ENTAL ASSESSP�ENT PARAh1ETERS Air Quai9ty: Odors Dust � Chemical content Ground ti�later: . Recharge capability Percolation cr leaching Excessive withdrawal or harmful substances �^ ' ' � � � � � J ' i ' ' , � � � � � � J ' L_J PAGE 3 Surface 4later: Vegetation: Fauna: Pdoi se: Land: Aesthetics: Socio-Economic: Appropriation Disc�arge - physical characteristics: clarity, temperature, etc. - chemical/microbiotic characteristics Runoff (leaching, erosion, flooding) Disruption Alterations to plant succession or habitat Disruption Habitat alteration or remova]; ecotones; ecosystems Endangerzd species Pest species Game Species (fish, birds, mammals) Intensiiy Duration Frequency Erosion Flood plain, shoreland, wetlands Soil suitability . Topographic alt�rations Park1and, recreational areas Compatibility of uses -- Critical areas� � � Land Ai r � :�ater Siota Structures and Roads � Harmony Public Health and Safety . Congestion Employment, Income Patterns Demogra�nic Alteratians Provision of Public Services Conformance with comprehensive plans, land use plans, zoning regulations, etc. Energy cansumpiion Cultural,Values F�rchaeologic and Historical Sites � P-litiqation of Adverse Effects should discuss environmentai p?anning efforts �µ and remediai cr mitigative measu•res that may reduce adverse environmenta7 effects. Efforts or measures already taken can be included. Alterati�ns to the action �vhich, if adopted, might preciude the ne�d�for an EIS can be included as well. In the Conclusion, the preparzr shall state his finding as to wnether 1) the action is a major governmental action or a major privat� action of more than local significance; and 2) the action has ihe potential for significant environrrental effects. The EQC staff will be conducting siudies on these quzstions and will eventually publish guidelines and threshholds which will assist in the determination of "major aciion�" "more than local significance," and "significant environmental effects." Until such time as these studies are completed, preparers of EAs are asked to utilfze sound, objective judgement. EQC will have the final authority in deciding wrether t}�� preparer's conclusions are warranted, and will exercise this authority in the form of r-eview �f EAs. .. rn a� o, rn cT � ' �r-- r r� r � r' r u >- 1 ' �' ; _ ct' ,---�� � � d' � t��, �.�,�,��,� ���o; .��� ^����� ���°� �� r-- N r N r r(� I.f) � "' vl � V> ' —_- — � , r- rd'Ol�} 'Ql 00 l_ Q' l0 M lf') r- Gl O r � lD M O Q 1 c V N • N il rJ � l0 r- r-- N 61 r `` t.C) � CO O l0 al O , ' � � � t 3 ^ tA � � � +� � ' •' � O � ' ' W �' � C] C' ^ �� O O� �-- ct e-- `C� N �� sr , � � �- � 0 1° >-- W4LQ..� 64 _,_J W �� � U CL � s" W � ri � '- i-1 �L � � u.. Q ---� � � O --� �N O �J'� (� i� ��. �'-' }-- :Y_ W �.-r r-� Q � � . V V 7_ � . � S11 � %' tfi l+,) fff 1 ri) �� � � �n lU W C� � � � w . � 1 � y c� {"" L2.' a � � Q . �.�, M M ^ � r 61 r-- N , � 1 C'3 � W �z d" � � � W ' � cY ' . f� � � r � 0 N r � S" ?G C!3 � W Z � l: J �--� �. Q � � C , � N W s,s1 r N � ' N t/) l.i � 4l U � � s,, 2 v N 1 � t� � � C M M l0 M � � � n � � v � � � r f� I.f) N � O ', 00 N N r- f� d' Ol O M l0 f� ' O �f' tc� 00 O '. N M CO � Ol t� N Cl Ol 1� N �t ci' r-- �t' N � w � � � � r � � � W N 00 C cf' � � v d' � 1� M M 00 Ol M O t.f ) O 6� l0 M � Ol M � N 6^ d� O l0 O r- r d' � � � d' ct N N d� Ol dl lf) M n l0 l0 r- Cf' d' I� CO O M I�. (� O� r--- r M N � �� J Q � � lL O M �c!- �'It� �it+ d' w w o -ts J J W n[ �S Z M v� v, �-+ c� N u_ � l . W u_ �p .— O Qlc.�=+t: ��?� 1 s`- ( � �,•— O � t� � Q 1 � O Q � ..� t_ . . . . �. '� rn � �n � o � n:. • �-- -f, l�.l L! o\o JLL.>- � � O d-� � O O -� - O � n • cn � Q�. _ I� r- O l� N , Q U t N r Ol d' � � 1� t�T �� M 1� l0 CO rt3 � N i. r a C� N 2 l.aJ � � J d 1-; V-T , !r�} � �.__ t � ..� r � �-,. . r'" V � M 00 �l dl �. � W S.. U C� � r l.C) O O I, v d' M r- M � I � { v i `i v Ci � �, � �� � � � CO M � d' �i-> a}-- . . . � . O�ti lJ r- O ln M `i� L7 O r- t.f) I\ Ct � Q N Ol Ln d' r-- > J O � - ^ RS M}-- �t lC) d' lfl r 41 N r I� - � � � r- �-- �'4 '�' V ' .� ' , N N O CO O W O O l0 f� �. G�C F- � � � ..0.� d' Ol ln CO O �O O. t I� Ql �!' r- •r ,� r Ol �t' lfl d-> � ' ..J � ^ n w �f . � M Lf) t.C) �f' C� s�+ �"ii � � Gl L'! � r �-- '6R ti} � �I— �� � f� Ol Ol d` N • �� � . V�� � M h CO Ol .Z.. � 1 �--� � � c-3 � � o� EL U C� � il � ^ T3 � M N tf) tf) O N U M �--� O �- t� N � i� • r �1 �t CO O al N r M � t� M Q -1-� tfl I� Ol t� r- l0 O a! L7 ^ ^ � W �' r M ..w �-. �n 3 O � � ' O N W t4 TS N � �t' � �h O� N cn '\ � N r-- � N O �M � . . . . V .. r t� M Ol O N � O �O N O S.. �[ Ly Op i�l N M �O LL1 � � �� � r r M � .a. C] � N • 4J �A � a O C] ] i J r-� < 3t� - w i � � ' � � �� L.L t O < M �� w J .y N � l� O ^ Ol r d � �k. d' � W p .ZS F-' —1 �� .. �L .?_ M W V) � � m cv o � i_ 'tL O .- ` O U -k. a � .�. � > � N • W O � � v M � � N �' LJ � - O F--- N � ' U N --� O � r � }-� 'C7' n Ol r- � N � � ^ � N r � ^ N d . Lf) N � � . r-- r `� �i � � r- � <p � Cy. d' O p p� N N � � � � M I M � CO - V7 • � U J � F-- O F--- �-- N M <t- �1+ �ta � =•� c N LsJ LU W LU Q o w � J J .� ��., ,1 ' � d KL :c ln (n (n N �--+ � t�.. t � i,.. � c� c LL LL t.�. La_. C� r O O ' O c7. U� FIRE DEPARTAIENT REPOR'I' FOR FEBRUARY 1974 Fire Alarins February 1973 Fire Alarms Fcbruary 1974 Decrease in alarms. Total Alarms for 1973 through February Total Alarms for 1974 through February Decrease in alarms ALARI�IS Autos F� trucks 0 Houses 0 Diultiple d�ti�ellings 1 Commercial 0 d ' 1 0 21 15 6 50 47 3 TYPES OF ALA}L�1S General Alarms .... 14 Company Alarms .... 0 Still Alarms .... 1 Average Response . .. 21.6� Average Res�onse Average Response .... 6.OQ In ustria Fire losses for the n�onth of February amounted to less Hospital 1 than $500.00. $125.00 of this loss occurred in an lst Aid � Rescue p Faulty Alarms 1 unreported fire. The owner mana�ed to put out the fire Iionest Dlistakes 3 and called for us to check it out. Joint Response 1 The regular monthly business r�.eeting of the Fire Department Appliances 3 was held February 7, with 32 members in attendance. i�'ater F1ow 2. biisc. 2 Three Department Dri11s �vere conducted this month �aith Totzl 15 an.average attendance of 27.33 meil. One group of �Veblo's and one group of Cub Scouts toured the Fire Station. a There were no Fire Calls to Hilltop this month. Ladder 4, The 1943 Seagraves, is out of service due to difficulty in obta�ining parts. I expect it to be back in service about the 20th of Nlarch. In future planning will have to considcr replacing thi.s vehicle. {Vas on vacation for two weeks, enjoyed the sunshi�le in Texas. � � ' .. Respect£ully submitted, , ,� . ,��'-"' ! � � Robert S. �flugiies, ' 'liief � � � � M �t lPl �p h� 00 O� O r--I N Cr1 �7 �1 � 1� `-� M M M M M M M �t �7 d' �7 �t �Y' �7' �7 z w � tx. o ...� � N .-1 Q Z °'I '�I N I°I N I NI � I�I NI �I N I° I� W � � � � � E � � � � � v � � E � � � � ro � a �,,, a. �. a a a a� ro a� a a W O Ul Ol �p I� 7 �T �i' 7 V'1 � r-I N O N (/') r-1 �l O � �t M �--1 N N N �I1 Ul Ul rl � vl Z O C� O M �1 ^ '"'� � � N �'1 1� O M N H p p � � � '-{ N r-I r--I N O O r--I N �-1 i-. . � � v"1 �1' ' ri Ul Ul L . - �. rn � � rn ~ M M �t-i M M d I I � I I � t!1 N N n� �1 N M N � N N N C].. o� O� Gl � � � � � � � � N M M M � M M . c"1 C'''1 M M M til I 1 t � l I 1 I I i Ly OO 00 GO � � CO N 00 OO 00 CA � � � � � � � � � � � N �,,� �,.� �,.� � � M M M M M M f--�. I I . t � t I I 1 . I 1 I H i� .;� Ir ^ I� I� I� �O I� I� I� i� . I� I� f� L � � ,� � p� G<) 00 � CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO � M M M �,-� M M M M M M t 1 M M M M .� U � � �+ � � � � � �' � � .c � x ¢ � � � a � � " � � ..J � � ° �n o. v c� w •�+ 3 •� � � • � Q ..� �. ,V �- i �+ u O � O � •r-I Q1 � V � .0 � u-a '47 �J 1� 1.! � �+ � � V1 � +? � :'� . - +� Cil �+ CJ 'LJ � C� ^J }-� u 11J � '� � � �r-1 � 1-1 � .L' ''!: C"-+ � � � N � cn as �+ � �' p � ro cJ cc � o � .� � G � � ,� �., � �:, h H c� a o : H � � � . � o � � a N •r1 � .� '� W U a 1-� Cil � � z a, � •� -� • � r_ o „ �. o c:a c�.' � � o Qo , � r� ro � c.� }. � � � 0 M z � ro � � ; ro ° � � � e� a� .� �s ' �' �r ~' � � � � � G u cn � w � � uai' � � � � a .� ua'i s� ua`i � .-t � � c � � � .'�n o � � x . � � � '� �1 m o '�' Q• � 6 c� 6 3 >, W >, G °o � � U y� N �'.., O 'O .� CO GQ � O �D tJ u'1 r..� •rl 3 �, 3�+ � M GO �D • •r1 Vl •r� .0 ('.. U �o '� � '-� Croj � � � � i � � � H .] � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ro � � a a, a a a a a ro �a �s a a w c+l �7 N O �11 t� O C� O O `- O �t � � � � �-i N N N �1 u1 �t �-1 u'1 ' .�. � �-i t!1 C tfl � .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. � h �-1 I� Q� N V1 f� O M N O O � � '--1 '"� N '-1 .-1 N O O rl N r-i W �t �t `T � �7 �7 �7' � Y �7 �7 �7 .7 �7 �t �7 �� 1� 1� ��. ^ 1�. i'� h f� t� 1� 1� I� I� I� 1� d ` � � \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �D �p .� �7 O� O c�! M c'1 �7 �O f� � � ��� � � � r--I r-I �-I � N N N N N N N \ \ N �, N ` . � � '� \ ` �. \ � \ N N N N N N (V N N N N N N 0 � �--��� -- � - � � � {:;..-: . . , . . • , ' . . . • . • F7R� PF.EVI;NTION LURLAU � • . . > ,, � . ' ry �• ' Summary of Fire Alarms . • February 1974 ' ' � � This Month _ This I•ionth Last Year Total ' Residential 1 3 1 ' � Nc���-Residential • 0 2 0 _ , ' Corli-nercial 0 2 1 - � Industrial ' 0 3 1 . . Grass & }3rush 0 0 0 . ' lsr Aid & Rescue 0 1 2 � � Auta &.. Trucl: . . p 4 . 7 � . False 0 1 0 ' Honest Mistake 6 2 14 Miscellaneous 7 3 19 ' Stiora�e 0 0 1 - Mutual Aid 1 0 1 � � , � 0 . 0 0 Hilltop . t Total 15 21 47 Respox�se 15 Alarms 307 men ' . . � 14 General Alarms 301 men 21.5/men call � '' � 1 Sti.11 Alarms 6 men 6/men call 0 Compai�y Alarms me�i /men call Death &•Injuri.es InJuries Deaths Total For Year ' � . ' . l�iremen 0 0 1 Civl.lians 0 0 0 •• � � es for month of Februar : Buildin s ' Contehts _. Autos & Trucks Otiier Lo�s Y � ,� -0- $ 350.00 -0- -0- . Losses to U1te $2,080.00 $3,897.00 $ 200.00 -0- ' . . . . . � . . . ' , , . • � � ' FIRF PREVENTION BUREAU ' Summar of Actiivities . Y ' � This Month Buildings Inspected g3 ' Re-Inspections 34 ' Inspections otiier than : 5 Buildings � � Bur'ning Permits Requested p ' By Inspector 0 ' By Others 0 ' Special Permits 0 Occupancy Permits 2 ' Total 124 Orders Issued 48 wOrders Compleeed 34 � I11ega1 Equipment 3 �lritten Warnings 48 ' Verbal jdarnings � 16 Complaints � ' Fixe Investi ations 4 � � Extra Activities � �: Two North Suburban Fire Marshals meetings ' First Aid classes for City employees Plans & checks on new construction Crowd supervision at Columbia Arena Career Day at Woodcrest School � ' , ' ° � �• . � , Tl:is Month Last Year 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 10 1 3 February 1974 Total 103 143 24 0 0 0 0 2 272 67 110 44 67 32 1 8