Loading...
04/12/1976 - 5447�5 r.� r -� JANET KONZAK ADMINISTRATIVE ASSTSTANT PUBLIC HEARING MEETING APRIL 12, 1976 � I i �� � t � THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF APRIL 12, 1976 The public hearing was called to order by Mayor Nee at 7:34 P.M. on April 12, 1976. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: • Mayo.r Nee welcomed the audience and invited them to join with the Council in the Pledae of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilwoman Kukowski, Councilman Starwalt, Councilman Hamernik, Mayor Nee and Councilman Fitzpatrick ' MEMBERS ABSENT: None ADOPTIQN OF AGENDA: MO7ION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee stated that ihe Council has a very lenqthy agenda and that causes a problem , in a public hearing because some people feel wE ought to move more quickl,y than we do, and the Council feels that we G�ant to give everyone a chance to be heard and to express any questions, beliefs, or convictions that they have. Mayor Nee said that these are important questions for the neighborhood, and the Council wants everyone to have a chance to put their comments into the record. PUBLIC NEARTNGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2: f The Public Works Director stated he had a coupte of aeneral comments to make. 7he i overall costs came in be]ow the preliminary assessments. The final construction costs are $14.�0 per lineal foot on a normal residential streefi. Any additions associated with State Aid Streets have been picked up by the State Aid Fund, and the residents whose property abuts a wider street do not pay for the total vridth of that street; just the normal street, the 36-foot width bacK-to-back street. � �• ; Further, the improvements have been completed, and the City has accepted the streets upon which there is a one year's maintenance bond to insure that the streets have been constructed to City standards. The side yard assessments are $2.90 per foot. � � � Considerable discussion ensued concerning side-yard assessments, explanation of the assessment formula,, and other matiers related to the assessment. The Council, the audience, and property owners had questions asked and answered by the Co�ncil and the fridley City Staff Members. The City Assessor explained and answered many questions that were posed by the audience. ' Nancy Thomas, 851 West Moore Lake Orive, took issue with her assessment rate. Mayor Nee said that if she desired to make a formal chal]enqe to it she should do so for , the record. Nancy Thomas ihen sa9d that for the record she�did chailenae the assessment. Z , � i � _ 4_. �erome Olson, 4740 Madison Northeast, said that he had a doubie assessment. MQTION by Councilman Starwalt that the hearinq on the portion of the project pertainina to Qonnay Rddition be continued until next week. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, al1 voting aye, Mayor Ne� declared the motion carried unanimously. William Kell, Jackson Street Northeast, questioned the curbing structures in that no reinforcements (steel) were used. The Public Works Director explained that the practice - has been discontinued because they have increased the amount of concrete in the driveway sections. Instead of four inches of concrete there is now six inches of concrete, but that the Department would check the matter o�t on the depth of the concrete. A citizen at 5675 Quincy Street also mentioned a driveway problem. AnQther person at 725 Bennet Drive said that his driveway was peeling, and the slab that the City took out was in good condition. Dona7d Milke said he had a driveway,that was too steep; the tail pipe of his car dra44ed onto the street when he came down his driveway. The City Qoofed, he said, in that his .--.... � ! � i ; � � � � 1 � 1 � � i 0 , �o � ; , i � 0 { PUBLIC HEARING MEETING Of APRIL 12, 197b driveway is steeper than it was before the City replaced it it had before". PACE 2 It has "twice the slant Gerald Adams on Monroe Street stated that he had a problem that was similar to Donald`Milke's situation. In quick order, several other citizens stated that they now had probiems with their driveways. The problems ranged from peeling to washing away. (The City will check these out.) The next section to be discussed was the 61st Avenue, Rice Creek Drive, Woodside Court, etc., area. There being no comments, the Public 4Jorks Director stated that in the Great Northern Industrial plat, the front yard rate was 514.26 per foot, and the side-yard assessments were $1.20 per foot. •MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the Public Nearing except for the portion that was previously tabled. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Uoon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROUEMENT PROJECT N0. 117: Mayor Nee asked if there was anyone present from the area affiected. There was no response. The Public Works Director stated that the development was a new one, and the storm sewer was constructed as the ��esult of an agreement with the developer, and all credits have been given for previous storm sewer assessments against the property. The final construction costs came in under the preliminary estimates. The City Clerk said that the assessment roll was prepared on the basis that previous assessments placed on the property were taken into consideration in arriving at the $8.60 figure. This gives the gross rate, and this is spread over the property and the previous assessment is subtracted. You don't necessarily end up with a uniform rate throughout the project. Mayor Nee asked if there were any comments or questions on this matter; there was no response. � MOTION by Councilman Starwalt that the Public Hearing be closed. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . PUBLIG HEARING ON FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISIQP� P. S. #�76-01, INNSBRUCK NORTH TOWNNOUSE IV AND U ADDITION, BY DARREL A._FARR_DEVELQPMENT CORPORATION, DEING A REPLAT OF OUTLOT H, CONSIDERATION OF TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT OF 100 UNITS, T-#76-01, BY DARREL fi. FARR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, FOR INNSBRUCK NORTH TOWNHOUSE IV AND U ADDITION: The reading �as waived. • 0 The Public Works Director said that the Planning Commission held the Public Hearing and � the matter was continued. The discussions ranqed cver a couple of ineetings on this particular proposal, and on March 17, 1976, they recommended to the Council the approvai of the plat with some stipulations. The basic stipulations were worked out � with tfie developer. These concerned questions that the property owners and the � Pianning Cammission had about the praposed development. � Stipulations were made: (1} To provide easement for a public trail adjacent to the neighborhood park. This is to assure public access around the park area that is � presently dedicated. (2j Plans specifications are to be submitted to the City for approval. (3j Off-street parking of 4.25 stalls on the fronting 24 foot streets. ` (4j The corporation will provide some legal documents which will notify the purchasers i that for townhouses there are no noise abatement structures. (5) Other stipulations i concerned trail development and lighting; a tennis court, and a tot lot. � The City will require the standard performance bond; and the City and the development corporation will work out an agreement for a solution to the extension of North ! Innsbruck Drive from the City limits of Fridley to the Silver Lake Road. i � � � � � � � • � �, � � � ; � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF APRIL 12, 19i6 ; i f 23. ; PAGE 3 ! t A reconanendation will come up in the next item, the Innsbruck Village Plat reqardinq maintenance of North Innsbruck Drive. The City could help Mr. Farr maintain the road. He wiTl provide a11 surface treat- ment of the street until completion.of the two developments. One of the problems was the plowing in the winter time. Our City maintenance people could help plow, and the developer has agreed to reimburse the City on an annual basis. The Public Works Director said there was an additional item. It was not a specific stipulation, but it was a concern. The City wanted to add a stipulation that the North Innsbruck Park dedication be provided for prior to a building permit beinq issued: Mayor Nee asked for comments from the public, and A1 Nesser, of Danube Drive, said ihat the Innsbruck Drive is close to the designed capacity, and he objects to the combining of the North Innsbruck Road extension to Silver Lake Road. 7he Public Works Director said that he was aware of the problem, but the City doesn't want to make improvements on a temporary situation. The proposal before us is a reduction in the density that was previously approved. The City has a traffic study from a cnnsultant engineer which indicates that once the road is improved to the Silver Lake Road there wiil be no problem. The department has been workinq with the residents and the Director to answer questions antl problems of the area residents. Unfortunately, we must live with a temporary situation. The City hates to beqin with improvements when in a year or two there might be a different alignment. Mr. Farr stated that he had worked out an agreement �•fhereby the corporation would maintain the road. We promised at the March 17th meeting to patch the road, and we patched it twice and it is in reasonable condition. If there is some situation that �ve can a�ork out with the City and have it charqed back, that is no problem. Whatever kind of a guarantee, we are willing to perform. The City Manager said that the concern shown by the property owners is valid. There ' is a problem near the intersection. The roadway should be widened, at least the outgoing lane, to more than one lane. The City could require a bond which will provide for the number of years for which he wou7d pay the maintenan�e costs to the City. We can maintain it, patch it, and snowplow it, better than he can; as we are better equipped. ! 7he City needs to work out the detai7s with the developer so this devetopment has a i good, passable road to Siluer Lake Road, and has a better intersection to the road, ' This could be in the form of a minimum guarantee that we cou]d give to the neighborhood, . and in turn the City would want some kind of money for it. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Farr if that was agreeable in principle, and P•1r. Farr said yes. The Mayor further stated that if the City can make an accommod�ion on the road, it wouid be less than what some of the citizens are asking for. It would be a reasonably , satisfactory solution that would be aimed for, not an ideal one. Mr. Farr remarked that, to put it mild7y, everyone knows that with the depression that has been going on in the housing industry in the last two years, he was probably $50 from invok�ng Chapter 11. He just about lost all the money that he had. The Public Works Director staied that at the end of the project we would have the New Brighton area to improve. We do not know how far into the future we can mandate that the developer maintain that roadway. The recommendation from the Planning � Commission was the last townhouse. j The City Manager said that any agreement that we may have with Mr. Farr we hope wilT be binding on him or anybody else who owns the properiy. , MOTIQN by Councilman Starwalt to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the pubiic hearing closed at 9:45 P.M. � � � , ; i i 1 I r t c � - � r ' 22 � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF APRIL 12, 1976 LIC HEARING ON FINAL PLAT SUSDIVISION P, S. #76-02, INNSBRUCK VILLAGE. SY ; PAGE 4 NORTH � CONSIDERaTION OF TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT OF 100 UNITS, T#76-02, BY DARREL A. FARR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, FOR INNSBRUCK VILLAGE RECEIVING PETITTON �{6-7976 -- TO CONDITION ACCEPTANCE/APPROVAL OF PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. �76-02, IIVNSBRUCK VTLLAGE ADDITION, BY DARREL A. FARR DEUELOPMENT CORPO- s SUBUIVISION N0. 92, ALL LYING IN SECTION 24 ANOKA, h1INNESOTA ... INCLUDINf THE REOUEST MOTION by Councilman Hamernik that the reading be waived. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Public Works Director said this was a townhouse project by Darrel Farr to construct townl�ouses t� be located North of Innsbruck Driv�, and North of Y.he previously discussed townhouse development. This has been previously approved for 251 units, but what is proposed here toniqht is the construction and developinent of 100 townhouse units. The plat that is being proposed tonight is somewhat different than the previous proposal in that it is requested that a public roadway be constructed throuqh the center of the proposed development. , Again, the Planning Commission has held public hearings on the proposal, and in this � case there were three different meetings together with meetinc�s on the sub-committee level to get some input into the proposal. The Planning Commission recommended at their April 7, 1916, meeting the approval of the proposed plat �vith a number of stipulations which are listed in the Agenda. This is from the unofficial Planning Commission minutes as supplied with the Agenda, A few citizens then said that they were not notified of that last Planning Commission Meeting. They would have been there if they had known about it. ' The Public Works Director stated that once the official notice of the March 3, 1976, meeting had been published in the paper a notice would not be mailed out for any continuation of that meeting. ` The City Manager stated that the Planning Commission only recommends ta the City Council, and if there is any input that one didn't get in ta the Planning Commission; this is an opportune time to get it into the record. If the Council feels that they ' haven't enough information; the Council can, and does, have the prerogative of con-. � tinuing the meeting to the next regular meeting. If there was something you didn't'' get into the Planning Commission, now would be a proper time to get your comments to ihe Council. In respo�se to a citizen's question, the mayor said that the petition had been received by the Planning Commission and there had been discussion on it and that Chairman Harrls had read the petition. Mayor Nee asked that the recommendations be put into the record: I. "That the City of Fridley in consideration of its tax paying residents,estab- lish standards of year-round maintenance for the North Tnnsbruck Drive Extension ` (that section of black top road beginning at the Black Forest Apartments, and running East to Silver Lake Road), and that said developer (Darrel A< Farr Development Corporation) shall file a suitable performance bond with the City � of Fridley, which shall be renewed annually, and shali be adequate to properiy � maintain said road through eompletion of construction activities in the Innsbruck North Addition." • � ' II. "That the City of Fridley disaliow waiving the City Setback Ordinance in the above referenced area on the grounds that it would be discriminatory; that it would create an unsafe condition due to a minimum of two blind spots on the , ; proposed City Maintained Road connecting North Tnnsbruck Drive to Authur Street; � � � � , � � i i � 23 . PUBLIC NEARING MEETING OF APRIL 12, 1976 PAGE 5 that due to the narrowness of this Ciiy Maintained Road, and in vfew of assumed parallel parking on both sides of this•road, it will prove to be a major hinderance to Fire and/or Police emergency vehicies access; and as a result of garage/dwelling structures close approximation to the road itself, prove to seriously inhibit adequate snow plowing of road surfaces, short of truck removal from the immediate area, at City expense." III. "7hat the City of Fridley obtain from the Darrel A. Farr Development Corporation an official and acceptable understanding as to quad-townhouse homeowners financial responsibilities for maintaining al] non-City Maintained Roads in the above referenced area, as well as the upkeep of townhouse exteriors and common qrounds." The Public Works Director stated that at the April 7, 1976, meeting the Planninq Commission did recommend to the Council the approval of the plat with a number of stipulations, and that he wi�ll go through them: 1. Plans specifications for streets and utilities are to be submitted to the City for approval. 2. The developer deed to ihe City the Innsbruck North Park before any plat approval or building permits are issued. 3. The part of Lot 49, except the Westerly 210', the Auditor's Subdivision No. 92 that wasn't part of the plat be dedicated to the City as this was adjacent to Irtnsbruck North Park. 4. 7he tennis courts will be built by the developer on public park property, the location to be decided by the City with the completion of 20 townhouses in Innsbruck Village. 5. The road design on West Bavarian Pass must meet with City approval. 6. This was a negotiaied item with the developer. The City w�uld want a 36 foot width street, parking on both sides and with proper access. There was some concern expressed at the Planning Commission, and with the Environmentai Quality Commis- ion, regarding the green space adjacent to the proposed roadavay. A thouqht that came up was perhaps it could be done with the reduction in the.street width, but we wanted to insure the proper visibility along the area; that we would not qet into a situation where we would have parking on both sides and conaest the area, and we arrived at a 31 foot width street with no parking on the inside lane. 7. The minimum setback for any garage on 4dest Bavarian Pass shall be five feet, with one garage being approximate7y ten feet from the property line so that a 200 foot sight distance is maintained on the curb. 8. An additional stipulation concerned the pedestrians in the area as it relates to North Innsbruck, and that is that the developer agrees to provide a seven-foot foot path para17e1 to the existing extension. The petition that was received at the Plannina Commission, outlining the basic concerns of the residents in the single family area and in the townhouse area that signed the petition, mentioned three areas of concern: (1) They wanted some assurance that the North Innsbruck Drive extension would be maintained. (2) A second area was that the City should disalTow the waiving of the City setback ordinance. The narrowness of the public roadway then would create hindrances to emergency vehicles, snow plowing, and blind spots. This, I believe has been worked out, with a 31 foot roadway, no parking on the West side, and the setback stipulation. (3) The third point was to obtain from the Farr Development Corporation an understanding as to the townhouse owner's responsibility for maintaining the non-city roads and the maintenance of townhouse exteriors and common r,rounds. The Public Works Director said that if there are any additional comments that now is the time to make them. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive Petition #6-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion earried unanimously. ; , � ; The City Manager expressed a desire that there should be more green space, and that ' perhaps more off-street parking couTd.be obtained. There could be eventuaTly a i condition where there would be substantial parking on the�street. Ne is not so concerned �_ _ . _...... — - _ �,.� _ _,. _. ._.___ __ _.._ _ _ __ � _ _ _ _ _ . � _ _ � � , 24 i PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF APRIL 12, 1976 about the private roads as with the public roads. Mayor Nee declared that a recess would be taken, PA6E 6 ! (At 10:20 P.M. the Council took a recess.) {Council reconvened at 10:38 �.M.) (All members were present.) Mayor Nee said that at the time of recess they were on the question of a setback in the North Innsbruck area, and the material question is tivhether or not the Council chooses to approve that kind of a setback. The Mayor thou�ht rather than aettina into a legalistic argument on the matter that what ou�ht to be talked about is whether it is an acceptable idea. (The City Attorney returns at 10:41 P.M.) . Gary Samuel spoke about the setbacks. He said he has lived there and that he adamantly opposes the granting of a setback and the shoving,in of a bunch of low income housinq into a smaller area. Various other residents voiced their dissatisfaction r�ith chan�inn the setback. They baught their property with one view in mind as to the location and that Mr. Farr is now aticempting to shove all kinds of units in and channin� the pattern: There was considerable discussion on where, and how, the location of "low cost" homes would be ' and the affect on the pre-existin� houses that would be adjacent to them if buildina was permitted. Considerable discussion ensued among the citizens in ex�ressinn their views on density of housing, cluster housing, and other issues. P1r. Farr en�aned in the discussi�r. The Public Works Director su�nested that it might be in order to continue the hearin� , because of the additional comments that have been received and that the administration ; then could pet to�ether with Mr. Farr and brin� back the results of that meetinn later an. , • P40TION by Councilman Starwalt to continue the Public Hearin� to the renu7ar meetinq of April 19, 1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a vaice vote, all votina � aye, �1ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARTfdG OP! ISSUING AN ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE TO JOHhI G. PURP10RT AT 8298 UNIVERSITY AVENUE SOUTHWEST CORPJER OF UNIVERSITY AUEPIUE AfdD 83RD AUENUE (HOUSE OF LORDS, IPJC. : MOTION by Councilman Fitznatrick to waive the readina of the notice. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votin� aye, h1ayor Plee declared the � motion carried unanimously. r10TI0Pj by Councilman Starwalt to close the Public Hearinp. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Unon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deciared the motion carried , unanimously. PU6LIG HEARING OPi PROPOSED CHARTER CNANGES: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski tftat the reading of the notice be waived. Seconded � by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � Mr. Scott of the Fridley DFL said that he makes the same comment he made in January, 1976;'that although providinn some input, they have not been invited by the Charter Commission to attend other sessions. There was considerable discussion regarding Sections 5.03, 5.05 and 5.06, and the Council felt there was a need for some clarification of the wording and intent of the Charter Commission. Another area of discussion centered on the orintinn of the bud�et for the City. City Manager Qureshi said there is no probler!m of puttin� together the necessary papers. What we need is clarification from the Charter Commission on what they desire to be published. P1r. Bjerkesett, member of the Charter Commission stated that the Charter Commission's intent was to publish the budnet in summary form in the official publication �rior to the Aunust meetina. i Mr: Bjerkesett said that in Section 7.14 the Charter Commission's intent was to �ublish I t � ,. � � � ; PUf3LIC HEARING MEETING OF APRIL 12, 1976 �5 PAGE 7 the financial operations summary in the third week of April arid publish the City's general fund operations quarterly expense summary for the first quarter in July, the second quarter in October and the third quarter in January. , MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick that the Public Hearinn be closed. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all votinn aye, t1ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVEMEN7 PROJECTS: � MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to table the resolution to the meetin� of April 19, 1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votina aye, Playor Plee declared the motion carried unanimously. RES�LUTION #34-1976 -- A RESOLl;TIO�f CONFIRPIING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITAP,Y SEWER i�D S7CRM SE4JER If�1PROVEP•',EP�T PROJECT N0. 117: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution #34-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman. Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #35-1976 -- A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS -- TV SOLIDIFICATIOPI AP1� PIPE REPAIRS FOR SANITARY SEWER A�4D STORM SE4JER AND RIGID PAVEMENT SLAB-JACY,IN�: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution #35-1976. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #36-1976 -- A RESOLUTION OBJECTING TO THAT SECTION OF THE PROPOSI=D" RULES OF VOTES WHICH MIGHT BE CAST FOR ANY OFFICE OR QUESTION IN THE ELECTION: � MOTION by Coui�cilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution #36-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman ! Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ; ADJOURNMENT: i MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adjourn the meetin9. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the meetin� of the Fridley City Council of April 12, 1976 adjourned at 1:38 A.D1. Respectfully submitted, John Chegwyn William J. Nee Council Secretary P1ayor Approved: , , � i � i f i i 0 � . . . ' � . . . . . . . . . . ' .. .�_ - _ -_- - ..._ -' � .� -- - --�_._ � . _. . -- ' - --' � _ _ _. . � _ _ I � �..-.. � MEMO T0: DEPARTMEN7 HEADS ti Following are the ACTIOf�S �JEEDED. Please have your answers back in -� �Y�k� the City Manager's office by Wednesday Noon, April 28, 1976. Thank you. '�'� � FRIDLEY CITY COUiVCIL - PUBLIC NEARI(�G MEETII��G - APRIL 12, 19i'b - 7:3J PM ��j" . Opened at 7:37 P.P�I. � PLEDGE OF ALLE�IAI�CE: - Given ROLL CALL; All Present ADOPT IO��! OF AGEi�Da : Adopted as presented PtiBLIC HERRIidGSc jPUBLZC HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVE[�1ENT PROJECTS ST� 1975-1 aND $T, 1�75—�� ����� � The Donnay Area was continued to the next meei:ing. Several complaints, are to be investigated and an ali:ernate ro11 to be prepared. GINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Investigate can�plaints, .l-1C NANCE ACTIOFd fJEEDED: Prepare a7ternate roll for next agenda and put continued pari� of hearing on agenda of April 19, 1976 � � � �ANCE �. � � PUBLIC HEARING DN FINAL ASSESSMEi�T ROLL FOR WATER, SANITARY SEV�fER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No, 117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The public hearing was closed ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized �. u .2-2A 0 � � GINEERING � � i PUBLIC HEARIi�G f�EETING, APRIL �12, 1976 �� �� ������ � PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARIi��GS �CONTINUED) pUBLIC NEARING ON FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S. �#le-Ol, INNSBRUCK NORTH TOWNHOUSE IV & V ADDITION, BY �ARRtL A� �ARR DEVELOPMENT COR('�, BEING A REPLAT OF OUTLOT N, INNSBRUCK I'�ORTN ADDITIOi�, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF INNSBRUCK I�JORTH TOWNHOUSES, PHASE 1, II & III AND CONSIDERATION OF TOVJNHOUSE l�EVELOPI°i�N`l� OF iuO UNITS, T.#76-01, BY DARREL A� FARR I�EVELOPMEfJT CORP�, FOR INNSBRUCK I�IORTH TOWNHOUSE IV & V ADDITION� � � � � � � � � � 3 — � ��� Public Hearing Closed. ACTION (dEEDED: Put on next agenda PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P�S� #%6—�Z, INNSBRUCK VILLAGE, BY I�ARREL A� FARR DEVELOPMENT,CORP�, BEING A REPLAT OF OUTLOT �, INNSBRUCK I�IORTH ADDITION, ALONG ��J ITN LoT 49, EXC�PT THE WESTERLY 21� �, A� S' �#`�2, GENER/�LLY LOCA7ED NORTN OF i�ORTH INNSBRUCK i�RIVE I�IE AI�D �'��ST OF THE BLACK FORcST APARTMENTS � AND . . �. CONSIDERl�TION OF TOWNNOUSE DEVELOPMENT OF 1t�O UNITS, T�%6-02, BY �ARREL A�. FARR DEVELQPMENT CORPORATION, � �OR INidSBRUCK VIL�AGE� � � � . � � � . . . . . . . . ► � . • 4 ' 4 T Petition received. Public Hearing continued to April 19, 1976 �lGINEERING ACTION fVEEDED: Put Continued public hearing on next agenda. . � � . • . PUBLIC NEARING f�EETIiVG, APRIL 12, 1976 ��� �� P/�GE 3 Pl1BLIC HEARIiVGS (CotvT�iNUED) � PUBLIC HEARIiVG ON ISSUING AN �N—SAL.E LIQUOR LICENSE TO .JON�t G�, PURMORT AT $2g� UN I VERS I TY AVENUE f SOUTH— WEST CORNER OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND a3RD AVFNUE) iNOUSE OF LoaDS, I �c , ) , �, , �. , . � �. �, , �, , , , �, , . , , . � - 5 A Public Hearing closed � ACTION NEEDED: Prepare a Resolution of Intent for next agenda PUBLiC NEARING ON PROPOSED CNARTER ChiANGES� ��,,���� 6— 6 � Public Nearing closed ACTION NEEDED: Put ordinance adopting changes on next agenda iVEw BUSINESS CONSIDERATIOf�! OF A RESOLUTIDN CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR ST� 1975-1 A�D ST� IQ%�-2 STREEI' IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS� � �—% A Resolution tabled until public heariny ciosed. ACTION f�EEDED: Put resolution back on next a'genda. CONSIDERATI�N OF A�ESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEt�tER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No, 117�, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Resolution #34-1976 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as directed 0 . ., 0 , .. P[�BLIC HLAftIfdG �IEETIidG, APRIL 12, 1976 . �� ��� PAGE 4 iVEW BUSINESS CCOC�TIPJUED) CONSIDERA7ION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS — TV SOLIDIFICATION AND PIP� REPARIS FOR SANITRRY SEWER AND STORM �SEWER AND RIGID PAVEMENT SLAB—.�ACKING� .����� 9—� t� � Resolution #35-1976 adopted ` ENGINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Advertis� for bids I� � � � ADJOURi�: �.:�.2 A.M. l. 1 . . � . i r. . . � � . � .�� � . � . .� � - . . � i ��� . 1 . « ,� ti ,�� M���u ��: utN�Et►r��rv� K�xu�- - ��'�'��Y�'����� Folloe�ing are the ACTIOrdS (JEEDED. Please have your answers back is� . Jti the City t�anayer's office by i�ednesday Noon, April 28, 1976. Thank you. FRIDLEY CITY C011idCIL - PUBLIC NE��ING MEETIf��G - APRIL 12, 197n -- 7:3J P(�Z - ' Opened at �:37 P.��I. . PLEDGE OF ALI.E� � A(�CE : � Given i ROLL CALL: � i A1l Present . i '�,.� � ADOPTIOi` OF AG�iVD�I; : . I� Ado ted as resented P P � PUBLIC HrP,RIi��GS; � PUBL�C NEARIRG ON Fi�i/�L I�SSESS►�I�NT ROLL F�R STRCET Ih1PROVEMEiJT PROJECTS ST� 1�75-1 �tvD S� , 1�7�-Z, � . . . . . � — 1 � ,� The Qonnay Area was continued to the next meet�ng. Several comp3aints are to be investigated and an alternate roll to be prepared. 'GIi�E�RIhG ACTION PdEEDED: Investigate complaints. ' t•!AFlCE �CTIO�d idEEDED: Prepar�e alternate roll for next agenda and put carttinued part of hearing on agenda of A�ri1 19, 1976 � . i _ - . PUBLIC HE/�R I PJG ON � I tr'AL ASSESSP1EiJT ROL.L FOR �'1ATC�t, . � � SANI?ARY SC4�ER AND STORM SL-1•dLf: IMPROV�ME(�T PROJECT '. �d o , 117 , �„ � . „ �, , . , , " . �. . . �. . � . . �. , . . . 2 - 2 A The pub]ic hearing was c)osed itAtdCE ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as auti�orized . � - � � • � I ��. �� ENGINEERING � � PUBLI� HEARIf�G (�EETING, I-1PRIL �12, 1976 � �� �� �� � � � � PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARIi�dGS (Cor�-rirluED) � PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL FLAT SUBDIVISION P.$. �%d-01, INNSBRUCK NQR7H T0�lNHOUSE. IV & V ADDITIOd�I, BY �ARREL A. FARR DEVELOPf�IENT CORP „ BEING A REPLAT OF OUTLOT H, INNSBRUCN. I`�ORTH I�DDITIOi�, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF �NNSBRUCK ��ORTH �OWNNOUSES, PHASE 1, II & III : ► �� CONSIDERATIOI� QF T0;'�NHOUSE LIEVELOP(�icNT OF ZI�O UNITS, . T��f%6-Ol� BY DARREL AE FARR DEVELUPf•1ENT CORP�, FOR INNSBRUCK I�OR7H TOW�lHOUSE IV & � ADDITTON, � . . , � . . . . 3 - � � Public Hearing C1�sed. ACTION WEEDED: Put on next agenda PUBL I C HEAR T t�lG ON F I fvAL �LAT SUBD I V I S I ON P� S�#76-02, � INNSBRUCK VILLAGE, BY DFIRRE� Ro FARR DEVELOP��IENT CORP�, BEING A REPLAT OF OUTLOT }�, IN[vSBRUCK I�ORTh� AD�ITION, � ALO�!G WITH LOT �g, EXCEPT THE �'�ESTERLY ZIO�, A�S� ���, GEn�����Y LOCATED NORTH OF i�IORTH I r��sB�uc�: DR IVE C�IE , AND I`�EST OF THE bLACK FORGST AP/�R�"N1CNTS 1 AND � COt�'S I DERAT I 0�� OF TO��lNNOiJSE DEVELOPf�1CNT OF It�O Uf� I TS, � T��%6-OZ, BY D�iRREL A. FARR llEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, � FOR 1 NNSBRUC K � I LLAG E � � � . . � � � � .� . . . . . . . � . . � — 4 T Petition received. Public Hearing continued to Apri1 19, 1976 + lGINEERIPdG ACTION I•�EEDED: Put Continued public hearing on n�xt agenda. , � � �i� ��'IIVANCE �II� � �� PUBLIC NEARIPJG �'�EETIi�G, APRIL 12, 1976 ��� ���� PAGE 3 PllBLIC HEARIiVGS (CotvTir�uEn) � PUBL I C NEAR I i�G ON I SSU I NG AN Ofd—SAL.E LI QUOR LI CENSE 70 .J�H(V G� PURt�hORT AT $Zg� UN I VERS I TY AVENUE �SOUTH— WEST CORNER OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND a�RD AVENUE) (HOUSE OF LORDS, INC � ) � � E � � � � � � � . � . � � . . . . � — 5 � Public Hearing closed � . ACTION NEEDED: Prepare a Resolution of Intent for next agenda PUBLZG HEARIN6 ON PROPOSED �HARTER CHAf�4GES. �� �.. t.� Public Hearing closed ACTION NEEDED: Put ordinar�ce adopting changes on next agenda �� rr��a Bus 1 �s�ss 6-6E� �Of�SIDERATI�{d OF A�ESOLUTION CONFIRf�1I�:G AS5ESSh1Ei�T FOR ST � 1975-1 ��vD ST ��.�%5-2 STRE�T IAIPROVEh1ENT PROJECTS �.%—% A ResoTut7on tabled until public heariny closed. ACTION �dE�DFD: Put resolutio�� back on next a`genda. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING AS5�5SMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SE{ti'ER A�JD STORh1 SE4�ER Ih1PROVEMENT PROJEGT No� 117, . . „ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 8- 8� Resolution #34-1976 adopted � ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as directed : • , PUBLIC H�.ARIf'�G r1EETIi�G, APRIL 12, 1976 . �� � ��� � PAGE 4 . iVEW BUSI���ESS (COf�TIP�UED) : CONSIDERATION OF A RESQLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS — TV SO�IDIFICATION AND PIPE REPARIS FOR SANITARY SEt^lER AND STORM •SES�IER l�ND R I G i D PAVEMEIVI' SLAB—�RC K I NG .. �..�.�—� t� ' Resolution n35-1976 adopted ` ENGINEERING ACTION NEEDED: advertise for bid� � � . II� , � . ADJOURi�l: �.a42 aor��. , E� � � : � - 1 , ■ - 1 . . . . _ 1 . . � '■ . i 1. . . �. � � - � I11 ' 1 1 . � � a��• i � ; . . � �� �'� � � / ' `11• • • 1 � ' �:.._i. 1�._.� �A. ._._.. U � �� r �� ' �� � � / _ii,c�.lJ ► ` ��,� �.� .�� �i / � _�a w<�� ' � . �� .� . I �� ��' � � ' j r � ,., ' . A / � � � � �, --- �_ ....� _ .L..L I �i�1 I/ �� / r ' � t`i�L���i� « _ _ _ �� � ! / � i� ' / i ♦ '�._ � �iiri_y _r,. � _.� - . - - . � , 1 !j � . � / � / � , .., � ' � 1L��.� -. � >, , � ,4 � .- � ' �� ; �.,,,[,�.a,t,r, � ,/�' � � �� , . � � �� � / � / / /�� �, �� . •.. ! �, _ , _ ,.�� � ._..._._G:._ � • ��. 1� M��i� /�ii�/�!,'� � � ; _/l��%' � / � � '� ' � �• i � l � , ` I � � / ' �� ���.t / L /! �� i. / � - � ���� � ����� � �� ` ' - i � - / f .L ���' � � :� �� / . �� _ . ' rr . � � , � • ,� / � . � � I �� � �� �t- � / � i � /� �� . � � / ■� . ._�... � � � ,,,n ��/.� ��� '- - .// � � �� � �* � � , �I .� !�� : ' /,�l�'� , , , . `' L. : . - 1�.�..� L_ �i�� 1 . � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEET�NG � PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE:--�'V"fC� L, %o%. ,�'% C� T � NAME -__-__- _�________________________ADDRESS_==--____ ___________-____-____=-==-ITEM_NtlMBER __�� - y` �� � ` �3G '' ~ 3 � d. n _ ��--��, � � � �5 5 � I � k � �� .� a %1� . �9 � ',� � 5� e N�t/e7!` � � /%�� _ _ /% � _ . /1 i��il� � 0 CA 11 , ! �I �'� 1 ���1 �� �� � ��� 6 a� b ,�f�-a�- ��� �� � � � 16 �� b� �� � E M �' � ��4 �� ��� �� � FRIDLEY CITY COUiVCIL - PUBLIC HEARING MEETI(dG - APRIL 12, 197b - 7:3J PM PLEDGE OF ALLE� IA(dCE: ROLL CALL: ADOPT I Oi� OF AGEiVDa ; PUBLIC HEARIiVGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST� 1��5—I AND ST� 1��5—�� ������ i— 1 � PUBLIC NEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMEidT ROLL FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No, 117, . , , �, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , �. , 1 - 2 A �.J � ^ � PUBLIC HEARIi�G �IEETING, APRIL 12, 1976 PUBLIC HEARIi�JGS �CONTINUED) .. PAGE 2 PUBLIG iiEARING ON FINAL PLAT $UBDIVISION P.$. #7o-01, INNSBRUCK �VORTH TOWNHOUSE IV & V ADDITIOi�, BY �ARREL A. FARR DEVELOPMENT CORP�, BEING A REPLAT OF OUTLOT H, INNSBRUCK I�ORTH ADDITIOiJ, �ENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF INNSBRUCK �VORTN TOWNHOUSES, PHASE I, _II & III AND C�NSIDERATION OF TOWNHOUSE �EVELOPMENT OF 11�0 UNITS, T�%6-01, BY DARRf L A� FARR DEVELOPMENT CORP�, FOR INNSBRUCK (VORTH TOWNHOUSE IV & V ADDITION� � � � � � � � � � 3 - � fV� ', r PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P�S� #�6-�Z, INNSBRUCK VILLAGE, BY �ARREL A� FARR DEVELOPMENT CORP „ � BEING A R�PLAT OF OUTLOT $, INNSBRUCK I�IORTH ADDITION, ALONG WITN LoT 49, EXCEPT THE WESTERLY ZIO�, A,S� #`�Z, GENERALLY LOCATED IVORTH OF NORTH INNSBRUCK 1�RIVE C�IE � � AND WEST OF THE BLACK FOREST APARTMENTS aND CONSIDERATION OF TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT OF IOO UNITS, T#76-02, BY �ARREL A� FARR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, FOR TiVfVSBRUCK �ILLAGE� . � � . � � � � � � . � � � . � � � � 4 - 4 T �, � �r I � , � f E T�VG APRI L 12 1976 � PAGE 3 PUBLIC HEARING �I E I� � , I �� PUBLIC HEARIiVGS CCoNritvuEn) � � I �. � � PUBLIC NEARIiVG ON ISSUING AN ON-SAL�E LIQUOR LICENSE TO .JOHN G� PURMORT AT H29� UNIVERSITY AVENUE iSOUTH- WEST CORNER OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND 2�3RD AVENUE) �HOUSE OF LORDS. INC � ) . � � � � . .. � � � � � � � � � � . . � - 5 A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CHARTER CHANGES� �������� 6- 6 G NEW BUSINESS CONSIDERATIOfV OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSE 1ENT FOR ST, 1975-1 AND ST� 1g�5-2 STREET �MPROVEMENT PROJECTS� �%- 7 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No, 117, , , , , , , , , , , , , �, . , . , , , , , , . . . , 8 - 8 A j . ,� PUBLIC HEARING MEETIi�G, APRIL 12, 1976 �� PAGE 4 NEW BUSINESS CCOrJTINUED) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - TV SOLIDIfICATION AND PIPE REPARIS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND STORM�SEWER AND RIGID PAVEMENT SLAB-JACKING� �����. 9-� 1� . ADJOURi� : _� � � 0 �' � � 1 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS fVotice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 12th day of April , 1976, at 7:30.o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: ST, 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and � open to public inspection by all persons interPsted, in the office of the Clerk of said City. 1 At said hearing the Couneil will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of � street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, and other facilities located as follows: � � ■ � ST. 1975-1 STREET IMPROVEMENT PRQJECT Bennett Drive: 7th Street to Quincy Street Washington Street: 63rd Avenue to Bennett Drive Jefferson Street: 63rd Avenue to Bennett Drive Madison Street: 63rd Avenue to Bennett Drive Quincy Street: 63rd Avenue to Bennett Drive 63rd Avenue: Monroe Street to Quincy Street 64th Avenue: Van Buren Street to Able Street 64th Avenue: Baker Avenue to Highway No. 65 Service Drive Van Buren Street: Caro1 Drive to Mississippi Street Carol Drive: West Moore Lake Drive to Able Street Carol Circle Baker Avenue: West Moore Lake Drive to Mississippi Street Taylor Street: 64th Avenue to Mississippi Street Highway No. 65 West Service Road: West Moore Lake Drive to 64th Avenue Madison Street: 57th Avenue to Helene Place Quincy Street: 57th Avenue to Helene Place 6th Street: 53rd Avenue to 54th Avenue 53rd Way: Great Northern Industrial Plat Industrial Boulevard: Great Northern Industrial� Plat 61st Avenue: (Primarily Rice Creek Estates and Rice Creek Estates. Briardale Road: " 2nd Addition) � " Woodside Court: • " " Rice Creek Drive: " " Riverview Terrace and Mississippi Way (Monies provided under ST. 1971-3) � .^ � �ll � Page 2, NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET It4PROVEMENT PROJECTS � j �� , � � � � Regis Terrace: Lincoln Street: Regis Trail: (Overlay project to be paid by encumbered monies) . � �� ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (STATE AID STREETS) 63rd Avenue: 7th Street to Monroe Street Monroe Street: 63rd Avenue to Mississippi Street Able Street: West Moore Lake Drive to Mississippi Street 57th Avenue: 7th Street to Quincy Street Quincy Street: 57th Avenue to Carrie Lane Carrie Lane: Quincy Street to Jackson Street Jackson Street: Carrie Lane to 58th Avenue The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and Tying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits reeeived. A properiy owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. � DATED THIS DAY OF CITY GOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell 1976, BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR William J. Nee Publish: Fridley Sun on March 24 and March 31, 1976 � MEMO T4: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREE7 IMPROVEMEN7 PROJECTS DATE: APRIL 1, 1976 On the attached pages you will find the final assessment rolls for the ST. 1975-1 and ST. 1975-2 Street Improvement Projects. We normally prepare a separate project book for state aid streets such as the ST. 1975-2 Street Improvement Project, and for the standard streets such as the ST. 1975-1 Street Improvement Project. Because of the location of some of the streets involved �n this project, some properties receive assessments for both regular and state aid streets. For this reason we have listed the assessment rolls for the two prajects on the same sheet so that the total cost for an individual property owner is easily accessible. Separate cost sheets were prepared for each project. A summary of the costs follows: ST. 1975-1--NORMAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS: BENNETT DRIVE, WASHINGTON STREET, JEFFER- � SON STREET, MADISON STREET, QUINCY STREET, 63RD AVENUE, 64TH AVENUE, VAN BURE�N STREET, CAROL DRIVE, CAROL CIRCLE, BAKER STREET, TAYLOR STREET, MADISON STREET, QUINCY STREET, AND 6TH STREET The front foot assessment rate including curbing is $14.40 per foot. : The side-yard assessment rate including curbing is $3.13 per foot. ST. 1975-1--t•�4TER AND SEWER SERVICES: Two water and two sewer services were put in under this street improvement project. The cost for a water and sewer service is $419.80. ST. 1975-2 (MSAS}--STATE AID STREETS: 63RD AVENUE, MONROE STREET, ABLE STREET, 57i'H AVENUE, QUINCY STREET, CARRIE LANE, AND JACKSON STREET The front foat assessment rate including curbing is $14.40 per foot. The side-yard assessment ra�e including curbing is $2.90 per foot. ST. 1975-1--HIGHWAY N0. 65 WEST SERVICE ROAD FRONTING ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (Assessable to only the one side of the road) The front foot assessment rate is $21.08 per foot. The side-yard assessment rate is $2.90 per foot. � 1C PAGE 2, MEMORANDUM TO NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL APRIL l, 1976 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS . ST. 1975-1--53RD WAY AND INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD LOCATED IN THE GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER PLAT The front foot assessment rate is $14.26 per foot. The side-yard assessment rate is $1.20 per foot. ST. 1975-1--61ST AVENUE, RICE CREEK DRIVE, WOODSIDE COURT, AND BRIARDALE ROAD (Located primarily in Rice Creek Estates and Rice Creek Estates 2nd Additions The front foot assessment rate with curbing is $11.32 per foot. The side-yard assessment rate with curbing is $1.88 per foot. MCB ps � � � � �CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 117 � Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley wi71 meet at the � City Hall in said City on the 12th day of April , 1976, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the pro- posed assessments in respect to the following improvement, to-wit: � WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 117 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and � open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the C?erk of said City. � � � At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of water, sanitary sewer, mains and laterals and service connections, storm sewer and drainage facilities and related appurtenances, to serve the following properties: Rice Creek Estates and Rice Creek Estates 2nd Additions, plus a few adjacent lots, in the area bounded by Rice Creek Road, 61st Avenue Northeast, and that portion west of Benjamin Street Northeast The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DAT�D THIS DAY OF , 1976, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. � � ATTEST: I ITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell C MAYOR William J. Nee �a � � � �� 2A MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL,-ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIREC70R SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 117 DATE: APRIL l, 1976 l � Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 117 involves the installation of water and sanitary sewer laterals and services and storm sewer primarily in the Rice Creek Estates and � Rice CreE�: Estates 2nd Addition plats, plus a few adjacent lots in the area bounded by Rice Creek Road, 61st Avenue, and that portion lying west of Benjamin Street. � ' The developer of these two new plats has reques'ted that this assessment for water and sewer laterals and services be spread equally on each lot within the plais which have not previously been assessed for water and sewer, so the assessment roll has been pre- pared in this way. � In preparing the assessment roll for the storm sewer portion of this project, credit has been alloured on each lot for any previous storm sewer assessment done under a prior improvement project. A brief summary of the assessment rates for each portion of the improvement follows: WATER AND SEWER LATERALS AfVD SERVICES The assessment rate for water and sewer laterals is $24.72 per front foot. The assessment rate for water and sewer services is $384.49 per service. In the Rice Creek Estates plats the cost of the water and sewer laterals on each loi not previously assessed is $1,910.50 per lot. In the Rice Creek Estates plats the cost of the water and sewer services on each lot not previously assessed is $384.50 per lot. STORM SEWER The assessment rate for the storm sewer is $8.60 per 100 square feet of area minus credit for any previous storm sewer assessment. MCB ps � � OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE �THE CITY COUNCIL �� TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE i.s hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Counci�l of the City of Fridley in the City Aall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday` l�pril 1�6 I.�376 i� the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.NIo dor the pu�pose o�o 0 Consideration of a Final Plat, P<�� #76�(�1� Innsbruck North Townhouse IV and V Additions� by Darrel A. Farr Development Corporation, being a repl.at of Outlot H, Innsbruck North Addition, all lying in the South Hal� of Section 24, T-30, R-24, City of FridleyF County of Anoka,.Ntinnesota. Generally located South of Innsbruck No�th Townhouses, Phase Ip Ii and III. �Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at �his meetinge WILLTAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: March 24, 1976 �� March 31, 1976 �.,�.�,;,:�;� 1� �� ( } y'1 Y !I :� �-.Fi�. � "� � k .? ���.•�� �, �r�G. J. r� � -_ `= � � � �` . , , � \ � i, �� � r �!/J.CO � ' T � - ,,� ., �.. t..J �• �i `� � ��- . 3 A � � ." d � ' a0 +f � , �1 �1%! .�,ll.tY�'� \ '�'p�Gf �� � �G1S+�� :.J.'1. .r � �,,.y.,: u. li sos•�•d • '� o � !S �� � a��- . �: /..: � �/ � {:. i w�rro. '�..: �''� ,:, c � � � C^ ��?, � � 4f D i �: �i `� �f �-.r/ ,,. •. N , y'' _ v .....� . R_�r�f•� �1'elu�.( � , . ����w..7 y�7.•a I � ' ��� j. -�. a�iTl-� , ;�, .�t � ,) �� . � . ti, ✓/f + -�, �• y . , � "%Y - i �--7 � � t . :.� ��y � ` i.�y , . .: �' •••�. ^ , .O i J.' »��' �*� / N ',� C < . A � �•? : � ' _.=...�� = i .-� r i � i , • ., �;_1.�= �r c:� �y. i,� �; .�-'Tl..r`1 �� .� `� . . , �► � l: J`�'Z �� • Y V 4��°.,, `' � �T v -i'�(�=� ��.- .y, , P 7 z --. fx / t� T F ,' ' y,:% { , i` �, j., � ';� V � : ' ` ' / �,�,� /�.� ti �� } �'� � ? 1 .� '� � � q ;:. � � '-�-��i" /�/� -� = ;�� °i- .1 .-� � ,. yq E. -'. ) ,-i t � /�,. j '�� � �� :?_ r �yi /'*- � . ��� t,� ; � ..;^• � lj, :� , ��� �� � ;�, ;� ` � I�� � � : ,"{ r � � � !"� � ' . � p - 4 i : `"�. • .1 „ i `•'+F • ' � r � . a ,, �;` � ,� .r ;j � �=.-��l .,,s .7, , � l � � `<1�;�i ( q y � eM t ty �✓ { 1 ' i� ' �� q.� , � y '� � j �'� 4l ���. 1,. ! ek i�1''�1 � �T_" ` .Y�� 7� T �. I° �, I � L 5 B+� ,% f (`� �� � ^f 1���s�'� e � t � S �, " ,t n� F. F"'+� {j f Y� � �._ '4 f '�� � � �,. '" �' , r�l,.��`�/` �� ,�S'..S',,� 1��,, t.{�.` `r�.. ti✓' . � 4 y"r�f.��:i�c.�r�,,l`��.13 F��,I l� , . 1-Y �,.� ,�e _ �_ 1 �,�1 4!,`�1i7� � ��s. , �r f. , t � A � . ,:1: I ..4,+�r � � ,.._•,7; �` �,�'�.�l� �Cs �.,`s 1 y �, k> .< � If X-�' �� 6s' � :��r..'�-.�- _ i t �� : ��'�� . � r.. S`& � � �:�:'� 1� t, V�,.: � ���� � �� � �� � „t �� -���• � T �� `'I ` � v + ..�, �d L�,, .-,-� .,5. �j� �-4���-il i�„ E'.,a � �'.J'� �v .A.�yq � �y�, � r r' P� ' � : . .. . . _, _. � . ,�.,�_. e 5 � i: � 4'� �+ i ';_j ., ' . ���--'- � -� <� �.✓� . ,1L1 �;'� � � • i ti.�.+.....-�,,...-�m.. �-- � .x ��`1 v �'�'Q ! �d 1 �#�,�, . .� � r. -. :v /i./ , � r t ! h"� . � �' � `� . � t � J t ! N` � �* � .-'':T'7�F� �''fJ 2 :� ``' � i • , 61�? � ti� t"' C.z� h TO'%'4nr � � � �. � i j I � , ..! - `� � j`t��.. � "�dN�• ,�/L�,'r�.,�� � �.iB i�65�I3 o��y �...-y�'t:p'�, ����'r l+i. �� . _ _ � _ ... ', i�, i —,« f♦i (L' .-' '"_. �..�' �l` � I I l- J !�V 3 :`L �, �a' � ----�-- . .'� � ��-� r�e. �-�� � ' � u��_ ..,7� � _ f t°_A h � i- ��i'r'z-�= � � � T� � :,} � � � ': • i �' ,. : �3 .ss r I � , � � !t � -- �� `� y�--r` , ;� -„�c' ` �d e', t �.�"' �: s -_ � � . � L .l r � � ( 1 , ; �� e,s ` � _.�---r_; � � �j � o � � E , � 7 y� / � - � � ,.I G� � � p � � �r.� LOT /` £9 ��_� � . � t � f' .;� � rt': � � � .� � S � .;p � � an�. m _�- � r i [ .�i� -:.�. ,.���__`•��' - f _� f�•V' wi i a�_i�_y 'i'.. _s._..^«"<_.___ 1. . .�� 'Iq 4 . _� �f .— . i .��_ ..-,.._.:^,�-.�7r'�:F-���_ ' ��..�,.m..�.,.��.,..«. n:r. .. W��"' i�_6 !�� . ^ `<� � �,�.• i .' � \ ��-' .� ....,,,� . i � � . � �+..' • . � - , JZ��kt ..,�..� .__�...... . ,� @Q h � ♦ � .� N * 6ti A� `y4 ` .�l ,.� � ^ <:+ ' ' ;.:_ ,--•-� . -� � 1 '-� ! _,�k_��� •- .. ' .. , "�+., � u _ � �� �, ?�tr•., � � �y � �,� . � ; , � - _ ' _._. . --�---- • ► � tr,,R ,R,•f�,�'�":� -�l .\ -`_' -. _ ',f- �. I�'' ;� �+ . �:r{j� ot!+t.y� . •� , *� �• C�, 6�': E �"„!� � , r _ . -�� , � � - . I�Z ,� `� ,� \ ,•,�,, �Pr , '.� • : r ��t � ,�;.•,r �. . �•�: � �••,., OF1TL07' k �< � '�v'�a_' OvT \ ��'J� ti ;tc�g �` . ,►� o ��` ^,�� � � ' -_ , � � s� s�'.wS ^i ' � �� ,�� � , ,v, �= 'F��i ,.2,r �J f 1,���".4 � l � ` � � �� � � �_� � �� „ 7 3 j v `i ,ry, C. , I [� � !'„- 9is. °� � r� � �.•✓t�4��� i � �� � � ��� �� � w 'r 6! fo" � . 2 j4� ],� r'J�tr J�� n ��x^��: 1,� C ! �� t_ � � �J 4yj `?� Q�1���j_��o^ .� � � � .t�-�-'r --7ta_!`. t; . � ,'':. . ! ,. � � 1 � .. /jL, � r � � � f `, i :i... �;i �•:. .r==-��3.]i� :�S{jiaz�r..s� �r �5� T$' ���\"''�'�'� � S'SO'�,P'� ` � ., ry �, 1• ' ..� :. ,.... -�.��� .., .. .� i � • '� ` ' Mw� • � � . V, ).� � 0 �v:v . �'�✓F 1 � i ' =-'-_1 `� ___'' x ( _ :,_` � � ; . : . - _ _1,��_. r.[,_�� "�` � ,:'�,1• �^s �%+':�-.t^2:; ;� ' a . �t+Y • '� � --�7., .. ` Y� •` _ ♦ 7J � .. , �^'w�:-,.. • 1 ' �}._....,,,.,,,,,��" , � �. , . � ,,. . r, y 1 . � . • �:. � :=; .. ,,. . - . . � '� � � �` . : ' � ; - . �, _ ' ' • • • • .. . . . %. n. �. .r...... `�����, � �, q_ � t ,.��-p`'`-' ' � yj t � r' �e��d� �e��f'�,;e►y - �� , `.a, � � �, f ^ n �t � n ' , Plaizning Commi�sion Meeting - March 17, 1976 Page 11 3 B w�re thcre, and we as a City have granted the building permits and i�he development plan that has caused the problem, so in that respect, the City does have an obligati.on. Mrs. Sporre said the Environmental Quality Commission has �,�� formed an East River Road Project Committee because they under- stand that there are very many problems involved. We are concerned abou� the aesthetic beauadd�essin�.R15he said they the roblem that Mr. Peterson was g � p were a_lso concerned about the safety of East River Road, and that was of paramount concern. Traffic problems would be � I something that the Committee would be addressing, but she understood this was a necessary stop-gap, and therefore she ' would recommend that the Planning Commission approve this reques� b�cause thi�s �aas something that had to be dealt with � because peop7_e`s lives were at stak�: She hoped that the Committee could come up with a better solution in the future. � LJ L� , � Mrs. Gable said that she agreed ���ith Mrs. Sporre. She �aid that sh� persona.11y c�id no-L- like to see another billboaxd go up, and a billboard G•,ill not solve the big traffic problem. Ii: does seem thai� a diZectional sign would aid peoPJ_� in c,etLing to these businesses. She said that bo'ch these businesses pay taxes to the Ci�y of Fridl.ey, and they lzave the right to direct people into ther.e business, so she was in iavor ot the motion. Upon a vo_ice vot_e, Scott and Bergman voting ilay, Harris, Peterson and Gabel voting a�e, the motior� carried. M"r. Seege.r said he vaould continue to work ���ith the Cit_y and the County for a be-tter so1_ution, but he thought the Planning Commission had maele a wi�� decision �or the present. F.t least it ��,ii.l keep the patient alive unt�_1 the doctor gets thexe. � 2. CONTINUED_ PLIPLZ FiE.?1hING: CO?�?SIDrIZATIOiJ OF A PRELYi�iI?�'ARY - '��' r------ — -- PL71'1�', P.S. ;`�1G-0�_.,� INN�F3}:liCIC I�O���'iI TOv.NI3C)t1SE IV �'�D V ADDI`l'.�ONS,YI3Y_ DE"�RR�L A. FAI�R llLV�,LOPr•ZLI�1T CO�:i�OP�'�`i'IOr�': Being ' a replat of Out7.ot H, Innsb.ruck �orth l�ddition, generally located South of Innsbruck Nort=h To�anhouses, Phase I, II, ana. III. � � � Public Fiearing Closed. 3. CONTTNUED: COl�tSIDEP�7ITION OF 11 TOS4NIIOt1S1, D}�VFLOP�1rNT OF 100 UNITS , T- ;� 7 C- 0? , BY DT.1?I:�L I1. _ F'1-11�1Z UEVELO�'i�SL•:i�TT C0l2POR�1`1'ZON , FOP. 1NNSBRUCI< NOPTH TO���NHOUSE 1V I�Nn V 11DDI'1'IONS . Mr. Darrel �'arr and Jim London, along with an ati:orney, James Druck, wcre present. MOTION by 73er.qman, secot2ded by Peterson, that the Planning , Commission reope�� the Public.Nearing on a prcliminary p1at, P.S. #7G-01, Tnnsbruck North Tvwnhouse IV and V 1ldditions. Upon a voice vote, alI voting aye, Chairman 1larris decl�rcd the Public ticariny � reopcned at 9:15 P.M. ' � ' � , � Planning Commission Meeting - March 17, 197G Pa�e 12 , 3 C •.Chairman Harris said there were several concerns that were • mentioned at the last Planning Commission meeting, and questions were asked of the Darrel Farr Development Cc�rporation and of the City staff. He said that there was a memorandum from Darrel Farr and the City's answer to that memorandum, plus the answers to questions asked of the�City staff that were given to the Planning Commission just prior to this meeting. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Scott, that the Planning Com- mission receive the Darrel Farr Memorandum, plus the memo to Dick Sobiech from Jerrold Boardman dated March Z6, 197F• Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � � Chairman Harris said the first concern was that the stree�s did not meet the City sPecifications. The Darrel Farr memorandum states on streets: 1. The City of Fridley is the grantee under the road easement from the Fridl�y line across New Brighton to � the Silver Lake F'.oad. (Paragraph 3, Page 2, Development A�~'eement dated February l, 1971) a. The taxes being paid on the townhouses presently in place in the Black Forest is in the area of $200,000 � exclusive of single-family houses. b. It seems reasonable that Fridley should maintain and plow North Innsbruck Drive until such time as the pern►anentroad is constructed. 2. The road from the � Fridley line to SiZver Lake Road was built according to City specifications and with the City's apgroval. (Paragraph 4, Page 3, of the Development Agr�ement.) • ' � , ' , � � ' Chairman Harris said that the City staff's reply to these tv�o -items was the following: l. & 2. The City should not, at this time, take over the maintenance of the road easement from the City line to Silver Lake Road. This road is the primary �ntrance and exit for al1 construction vehicles and should be the responsi- bility of the developer so long as development is still occurring. Agreements for this maintenance should be drawn up as a stipula- tion for plat approval. At that time wh�n construction is com- plete, and if New Brighton has not firmed up road development in this area, the City could consider take over of the maintenance of this road if the developer would insure that the road is brought up to City standards. Mr. James Druck gave the Planning Commission a copy of the Development Agreement. - Chairman Harris said that item 3 under streets in the Darrel � Farr memo states: 3. The Development Agreement sets out on Paragraph 5, Page 3, that all streets and utilities in the town- house area shall be approved by.the City of Fridley. Mr. Board- man's answer to that was "The streets and ultities in the Townhouse Association property}1��� been constructed to specifications ap- proved by the City. There should be no additional burden to the Association for repair or maintenance over that of a normal resi- dential street. Ali:hough the width of the private streets are not necessarily the same as a residential street for public use, ; they were approved by the City." Number 4 in the Darrel I'arr memo states: 4. As regards street repair for construction traffic � ' � ' � , � �_� � � � Planning Cotnmissi.on Mc�eting - March 17, 1976 Page 13 3 D in Addii�ion 4 and 5, the following: a. West Bavarian Pass was designed with f.uture construction traific in mincl..and as such is a nine ton road consisting of a 4 1/2" asphalt and a l 1/2° wear course. b. nithough we will l�e using both �9est Bavarian Pass and Meister Road for const'ruction traffic, we will, to the best of our ability, restrict heavy vchicles to [�1est Bavarian Pass. c. We will escrow $10,000 at the start of construction with the Homeowner's Association toranply to resurfacing or repair of e�;isting streets. This will be treated as a prepay- ment of fees required of the developer at the rai:e of $10.75 per month per lot. d. $10,000 should pay for a 2" overlay on Meister Roaa and Wesi� Lavar.ian Pass. e. We will block �ast IIavarian Pass from the end of the Vienna Townhomes to the Fifth Addition during consL-ruction. f. We will patch the asphalt during the construction period and ��,rill sweep the streets because of construci=i��z r.�ud as neec�ed. This will be done at the developer's expense. 5. The alf-street parYing in thc Fourth and I'iitli Addition has been requested by the Cit.y and is sho�m on the plan. b4r. Board:r.an's mer,o in tiis ar�s�;rer said in regard to numb�r 4. We fec�1 tl�ie mecnorariclum covers the Assoc.iati_on's concei:n on street x'e�air due to COAI:�truction traffic, and numbe-r 5. Off-strcet par}:ing is acceptable as sho�•1n on tlze plan. P�ir. Farr said that in regard to his memo, they had met t-aith the Board oi Dir. ec�Lors of t_he D;orth To��mhouse Association last Friday night (Mar_ch 12, 1976), and we discussed all the street proble�ns i�.z regard Lo the interior streets in the Assor_iation. We aid carne to ve_rbal �gre��merlt witY� t.hem, 4nd cur legal cou.nsel was draft,ing an a,reement i.hat would be siqned and executec3 prior to the Cii.y Ccuncil meeting of_ Ppril 12L-h. M?,. Doug]_as Van t'lrkel, Presi�ent of the �1'ownhouse Association con�irmed Dir. Farr's statement. Mr. Pet=erson ��sl:ed i� the neg�ti.ve statements that were made � by people in the To�:nhousc� Associat�ion had been anscaered �ay this memo. Mr. Van ArI�e1 said the �����ciat.i.on�,,as not as concerned as they had beeil abaut th� interior s�r�ets, but they were si�ill ' coiicerned auout the extension o.f No�_ th Innsbruc}c Drive bei��,Teen thc F'rid�_ey line and Silver Lake Road. ��,Te still wonder how this pioblem can be solvcd. � ' � ' � � Mr. Peterson as}:c�d Mr. I'arr how much �aork wou]_d be involved in ��riilg.i.ng tlle Nor.�h Tnnsbrucic Drive e:ctension uu ta City atanards. rTr. Farr said l�e dic3n't know, but it would cost more money than he would want to pay. Iie said tha�L ���hat the City menio was saying �vas that the City shouldn't take. over the maintenancc of this r.oad at this time. IIe said there caould have to be some new typc of agree- meili� dra�an up ii l�c, as th� develoger, was expectc�d to maintain that eatension road a� the prescnt time, becausc his obligation to maintain that road had e�pired on February 18, 1976. Iie sai.d that as this road needecl repair now, he i'elt he was under some obligation to repair the roaci at this time. Mr. Peterson said that as Mr. Farr was coming before the Planning Commission anc� the Ci.i:y Council for new dev�lopnicnt in this aica, he caould be vc.r.y interested in how the problcm oi this road being m�intained was going to be handled before he had to votc on these proposals. J � � ' ' � , � � � ' �I� � ' � , Planning Commission Meeting - March �17�, 1976' � •' Page ].4 3 E Mr. Farr said that he thought a reasonable alternative, and • he hadn't discussed it with the City staff, was for us=to maintain the road until such time as we complei�e construction, which was a concession on our part, and for the City to plow this road in th� winter, because he fclt this had been the biggest single problem. The equipment that we have to plow the Black Forest was not larqe enough to do an effective job. The equipment that the Townhouse Association has was not large enough to do the job either. He said th�-' City already plows North Innsbruck Drive, and for them to plaw this additional 1300 feet between the City line and Silver Lake Roac1 seemed a reasonable request, as this road was used by Fridley residents. iie said that he was agreeable that they would maintain the road until such time as the construction was completed if the City caould plow the road in the winter time. Mr. Bergman said the pot holes in this street extension were getting deeper every day. Mrs. Gahel said she was completFly confused on who was supposed to be responsible for this road. Chairman Harris said that was the crux of the problem. Thisstrest s�emed to be in limbo at the �resent time. . Mr. Harris said the Planning Commission had some,concerns about the parking for the recreational building. Mr. Farr's memo states: l. At the time of the planning and zoning, the City did not wa»t to provide a lot of parking in the area of the recre- ational building to preclude the use of the recreation buildir�g for -L-hings unrelated to the Homeo�aners Associatio�, i.e., antique sales, etc. 2, jae have urovided parlcing for approximately 27 cars at pr_esent. 3. We can provide an additional 20 car parking on the east side of P�ieiste.r Road and south of the recr�ation build- ing� a. This parking, because of the topoqraphical conditions, would requiie the partial filling oi� �Lhe low area east of Prteister Road and the dcstruction of a very large area of trees. Sae in- tend to leave i�his decision to the Homeowner's Assoc�.a��.on. Mr. Harris said the City staf.f was agreeable t�o these statements. Mr. London said they had dicussed this with the Townhouse Assn. also, and they will make this decision by April lst. Mr. Van Arkel said that he felt this decision was up to the Townhouse Association and ti�as betwe�n them and Mr. rarr. He didn`t think �his was up to the City, and they wouldn't be involved in this decision. He �aid that many people in the I�ssociation were izot in favor of the destruction of a great number of i�rees i:o provide more parking. Dir. Farr said they were prepared to put in an additional 20 parking stalls ai: the Hom�owner's Assocation direction. � Mr. liarris said that to back up, he asked Mr. Boardman what ' �. was meant in his memo about the maintenancc of the extension road between the New IIrighton line and Silver Lake Road. Mr. Boardman said that in the past, the City had a five year developm�nt . ' agreement with Darrel Farr on the maintenance of this extension. He said tlie iilten� of that agreement would that the construction would be enti.rely completed within these five years, and that by 1 that time a decisioii would have been madc� by New Brighton for permanent road location.. This wasn't the way it happened, but ' - � Prann�n� Commissi�n Meeting - Marcl� 17, 1976 � Page 15. admini.stration £ecls that as construc�Li.on was sL-ill going on in .3 F th� area, it shoulcl still Ue the responsiblity of the dcveloper tb maintain this road, and any responsiblity the City might have would be after thc construction was completed, if the road devel- opmeni� plan hadn't been �irmed up by New Brighton at thai� i:ime. He said the developer would still. be using this extension for entrance and egress during thc devc�lo�ment of the property. He s�id that when thc developer no longer owns property in this arca, then he would then have no responsiblity in maintaining the road. Mr. IIoar.dman said hc didn't believe that this extension road had been constructed as a 9 ton road, and he didn't kriow if any inspec- tions had every bccn done on it. He said it was put in late in the fall, and by the ne�:t spring it was pretty e�ell broken up. Mr_. Peterson said L-.hat Mr. Farr has stated that he would be willing to maintain�this road during construction, if the City would plo��� the street, because this had been inadequately done because of the size of the equipment used in this development. He as3:ed P�ir_ . Boardm«n i� he foresaw any problems �aith this �ro- posal ii th� road ��.as maiiztaincd ir. sucll conclition that it could be plowed. Nir. Bc�ardman saici this uaas a decision that� �aouJ_d have to � be disc�ssed with the Public t^�orl:s Director and the City P�Sanac�cr. Mr. Farr said this roac� `�las put in the day after Tnanksgiving, � and they knew it was going to break up, but th4y had to have som� way for the people to get in an out of the area in the �ainzer time. He said it was r_esurfaced -the follo���ing spring. ' � �� , ' Mr. Jim Lal:a:.�z��•�s?ci, �.536 South Obexlin Circle, said that as far as hc COl1ZC2 uzic��rstanci, the Dzrr_el E'arr' s agrc�elrent �vas at an end, and lt'=`cl�<< City of I'ridley`s turn to play the game �-�ith this e�ai�ension. r�ir_ , Board:nan said that it �aas the intent of the ae�re�mei�t that it �aou7�d be in effect until the construction ���as comple-ted in this ai �a . Mr. Pe �erson said tlZat w�sn' t�aha � the agreement :-aid< Hc said that most o� the City adminiszrai.ion tha� taei�e her� i_n 197I are still �•�ith the City. Iie said the agreemei� t was sign�d that this �aould expire in five years, and now they want to change the r.ules af the game in the �ou.rtl-i quarter. M�'. Druc]c said tha� Mr, rarr did not have any quarrel abaut maintaining this roacl during construction, if in turn the City w�uld agree to �low the street, becaus� of the size of equi.�.nent. He said this would only be about 1/4 of a mile, and wi.th all the strE�ets that Fridlcy plo�as now, this wouldn't seem like too much of an additional burden. � Mr. liarris asked if the Planning Commission wanted to go all ' through both memos Uefore any additional comments were m�.de. Mr. Pei�erson said he didn't think there was much problem with th� rest of t1z� memo. IIe said i.t scemed that the Homeowner's Assn. ' was satisfied with Mr. Farr's mcmo and the City staff was satisficd, and therc was agrecment on everything e�:cept the extension r.oad of North Innsbruck Drive. . ' � ' Mr., Bcrgman said thc North Innsbruck Drive was a fine stre�t, �� r � , � ' � � ' � , ' ' � ' ' Planning Commission Meeting - March 17, 197G Paqe 16 , 3.G up to the Fridlcy boundzry. At that point, it narrows appreciably , to a 24' street �ahich was curbless. He said this street merely follows the natural terrain with hills and vales, including some slippery spots. He said he thought the bottom slope carried water across it, instead of being raised and having a culvert running under the road. �ic said there caas quit� an amount of pedestrian traffic with no place to walk exc�pt along the edge of this curbless street which was presently poorly plowed. He said that the statement in the staff inemo on this extension could mean t11at any actual improvement on this street could be ten years away. iie said that. with the increased density that will occur with the completion of this densi�Ly will make this pr_oblem g�t worse instead of better. He said he was concerned because we were discussing stop gap measures instead of addressing the real problem. ' � Mr. Harris asked future to have this it was. He sai3 the end of the improved gra�el pit where it if it was the intent that at some time in the road corinect to Palmer Drive? Mr. Lond.�n said road would then start to curve right at the Nortn Innsbruck Drive, and then around the would tie into Palmer Drive. _:_. : Mr. Peterson asked i.f the easemen�L had already been given for this proposed road. Mr. London said that at the time this road proposal was approved, they o�aned that property, but he didn't think there was an easement now. Mr. Boardman said that road pai.tern ��oul.d be �-�ar}ced out when the property was developed in New Bright:on. Mr. Petersan said then the only property that was under the control of Frid:ley �aas tlle qr��nted easement for the e:xtensipn of Nort.h Innsbrucic Drive to Si]_ver La}:e Road, so that's what they should be concerned with and riot pie in the sky at sam� period in time tlZat could b� quite far into the future. Asr. Farr said that at the -cime these developments were planned in Fridleyr they had also planned 1,000 units in New Brighton. The traffic stu.dy th�y had done, using the new street proposals did show that this area would not have any tr�ffic problems with that street plan. He said tlzat if he still o��aned the property in New 33righton, he would hurry up and build this road. I3e did feel tl�ai� if the extension road was really maintained, that peopl� wouldn't b� quite so upsei� with this road. Mrs. B. J. E�aers, said that she felt this 24' street was too narrow for two cars to pass now, and she didn't care what any traffic study said, sh� felt there had to bc an answer to th� traffic problem that e�isted today. Mr. Stephen Tollison, 5538 Meister Road, said there was a , question raised at the las� meeting about the people in the townhouses paying the same taxes as people wlio 7_ive on public roads and have their streets maintained and plowed, as opposed ' to people who have private roads, and bear all these cosi�s themselves. Mr..Boardman said that taxation was bas�d solcly on va].uation of property, and not on services provided. (Several people in the ' audieiice toak exception to this statement and said it was contrary • to what they had becn told by the Asssessor). � � ' ' J ' ' � � � ' Planning Commissi.on Meetinc� - March 1.7, 197G Page 17 _ Mr. Harr.is then procceded to read all the answers in the stafi mcmo which had beeii directed to them at the last meeting. 1. The street specification is answered under I(3) of the mc�morandum. To date tlier.e has been no parking problem related to cmcrgency vehicle operation that we are aware of in the l�ssociation property. If this does become the case, it is anticipatecl thaL- 'no par}:ing; signs could be located where needed. 2. Taxati.oii is based solely on valuation of �roperty, and not on services provided. The City will not: take over the maini:enai�ce oi the street� in the Townhouse Association. The roaas do not ineet right of way, setbac}� and width requirements foi public str_�c�ts and any ta)ce over wou].d set a precedence foi the maiiztenance for other private dc�Tel�pments. 3. The City of N�w Brigh�on wi]_1 not ta},e any positive action on road construction until the-property is developed. They have been granted a State Aid connection when final loca�ion is decided upon. � � Nir. Ter�y T��iley, 5571 East Bavarian Pass, saici that as none of their tar,es �,�ere goi_ilg to�aards the maii��enance or plo��ing of tlleir streets, then 1�.� thougizt it Shouls go to�•�ards giving them a decent road to Sil�rer Lake Road. I�iOTION by Pet:erson, seconded b� Bergman, thaL the Pla��n.zng Commission cJ_o.se the pub�ic h�arzn_q on the coT�siderat.ion of a pre.iiminar� plat, P.S. '�7G-01, Ii�nsbrucic llorth To�,�nhouse IV and V Additions, by I�arr.e�i �'l. Farr Developn•ent C:orporation. Upon a voice voLe, a11 vo�-z��y ayc, Chairman Harris decla2'ed • the Public Nearina closecl at 10:15 P.l�i. P�fr.. Bergrr!an s�id he thought tiiey vrcre involved in a step ' by step process herc and wh��t l�e thought should be step on� would be to eliminat.c the hazards on the eytension of Nor�th Innsbruck Drive. , , , .' . i � , � 110TI0�'�r b� I3ergmc�n, seconded by Gabe1, that t1�e Planninq Conmission requ^st the City C`ouncil to puss a resolution that tlie City admi.n_is- tration yet Loc�eLl�cr wit1� the Darre.l F'arr Development Corporatzon and ph�s.icaZ.Zt� vic�a the extcnsion of North Innsl�ruck Di�ive up �o 5ilver Lakc= Road, and esL-ablish an agreeinent �'or. immediate correction of tlie pr. es�t�t. surface l�a z��rds . Mr. Peter �on said tl�at hc spo);e in favor of the motion, but he had some c�uestions and onc of tlz� qucstions he had was what was fairfor the Darrel rarr Corporation Uecause he felt that he had come to this meetinc� with a good proposal, and he had ti.ied to >>e agreeable. I�e said he was surc that AZr. I'�rr had a�o objec�tion to mecting �oith tl�e City in terms of looking at the :road and in esi;ablishincj ���hat should Ue- done, but he has said that he woul.d be wi1].ing to �:ay to rc��air tlze road. He said that before we make a mot�.on li.}:e i:liis, ]ie t.hou��ht some assurancc should be given to ML. rar.r that we concur witli his rec,uest for development. �Mi�. 8ergman explained his motion, and said he wasn't too con•cerned an �calio f ixed tl�is ro�d, just so that it got done . H.� said that if Darrel Farr di.dn't want to fix the road without assurance tha� his ��ra�osal would bc ap�roved,_then he thought the City should tix the 'J Planning Comrnission Meetinq - March 17, 1976 Page 18 3I ' pot holes. Mr. i3oardman said that h�.didn't know if the City ' ac�minist-ration could take some action on this wii�hout Council action� and the ner.t Council meeting was April 5th. IIe said a resolution took Council action, it wasn't a decision that could ' be�made by the administration. � � � �� Mr. I'arr said that if they could get asphalt they would patch that road right away. Mr. Aergman said he would appreciate that. Mr. Harris said then there was no need for a resolution to have the City go out and patch the road. Mr. Bergman said that on the basis that Darre] Farr would patch the pot holes, he would WITHVRAW HIS h10TION. Mrs. Gabe.Z withdrew her second. ' Mrs. Sporre asked who was going to plow the snow. Mr. Bergman said wheri he made the firsL- motion, he };neG•� �h�re were many other probleins i�.o be addressed. � Mr. Bergman said he didn`t thinlc the question of the extension ' of North Tnnsbruck Dr_ive had been answered as had been requested at ihe last meeting. Mr. Boardman said he thought that it had. He said there were two positions on this street, the City administr�;-�. ' tion's and Darrel Farr's. He said th � Planning Commission should make a recommendatian on ho�e this conflict cou�_d be resolved, but it was a Council decisian. He said there would have �to be a new ' agreement worJced ou�L on this Nor�rh Innsbruck Drive exte�lsion. He said that City administration could not say hova it was going to be handled. It was not their decision to make. ' Mr. Bergman said that it seemed that if a developer says a street was goinq to be public, then it had to meet certain guidelines, but if a developer says a s�Lre�� was going to k�e ' privai:e, t�h�n it was no longer treat�d ���ith the same guidelines or rcqui�: ��m�nts , and he r_ouldn' t undez stand why this shou7_d be . Mr. Boardman said that the streets in a p-rivate d�veiopmcnt have ' to m�et specifications approved by the City. 6•dhen w� talk about City specifications for s�rcets in publ.ic. areas ��� are talking about the required street width, the right of ways and setback requir�ments. He said there was a public responsibil_ity tlz� ' City had on public roads. Str�ets in a private area wer_e no longer a public responsiblity was no longer in effect at the City level. This was the reason why although wc apprave the � , specifications for the construction of the roads as to mat and base, the street widths can vary for a priva�.e developmen.t. ' � L� C D4r. Scott said he thought it should llave been outlined clearly what streets were the responsiblity of the City, wha� streets were the responsiblity of the developer, and what streets were the responsiblity of the Townhousc Association. He said he felt that tlie extension road from the Fridley line to Silver Lake Road had been badly bungled by i�he City, and because they had bungled in in putting a five yc�ar agreement on the maintenarice of this road which•has now expired and the developm�nt of the area was not completed, he felt it was the City's responsiblity to see that Fridley residents had a safe exit and entrance to North Innsbruck . � � P].anninc� Commission Meet�.n� - r9arch 17, 197G Page 19 �� J� Drive, and hopefully th� City would take care not to get caught �� aqain in this type of �nonsc�nse. • . . MOTION by Scott, s�conded by Bergman, that a recess be declar�d. � Upon a voice vote, a11 voting a�e, Ch�airman tiarris declar�d a recess a� 10:35 P.A1. � Chairman Harris reconvened the Planning Commission meeting at 10:54 P.I�i. Mr. Terry �9iley, 5571 East Bavarian Pass, voiced his concerns � about the problems on the 24' streets during the construction of the to�mhouses in this plat. � Mr. Harris said i� had just been cal_led to his attention that the Public Hearinc� had been cl.osed on Innsbruck IVorth To�mhouse IV and V 1ldditions, and tlier_e were peopl.e �-aho �aanted to discuss � problems in the 5th Additioil, so this pub�ic hear_ing should b� reopened. � ' P70TI.�,�. hy P�terson, seconded by Ber.gman, that the Planning Commission reopen the Puhlic Hearing for the consideration of a preZim_inar� plat, Innsbrucl: North To�•�nhouse V Acidition, by Darrel Farr, part of P.S. i176-01. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting � auc, C_h�irman Harris d�clared Lhe Public Hearing open at 10:52 P.11. � AZr. j^;i1ey said thel-e �aer_e items m:�ntioned at the last mee�ing that hadn't been. �iscussec� at this r,zee-L-ing. He said that it was stated that L.au= � i;ava!-ian Pass �-rould b� closec� during cons-L-ructio:i � of the appres�imate numJ�er et 50 to��Tnhou�es in tl�is area. Fie said that a�ter the construction ��rUs comp�etcd� and th� peeA_�1.e fl-om tliese 50 to��,rnhc�uses sta.rt using East F3avarian Pa�s, it �was going �c_o ciPa�Le a pro?�.lem. I�c said it �•:as very diffi.cult to' bac}: out of � garages on Fast �avarian Pass because thcre �,lere usually people waiting to c�et on to b�eister I:aad. He sa.id he felt tliere should be a secoild e�,_it for this area. � � � � Mr. Ilar_ris askecZ NIr. London if ther� was anythin.g that could be done to eliinin3t.e thc bottlen�ck �to Dl�ister Rcad? Mr. London said that �ast Bavar.ian Pass had been approved at the ti.me of the Vienna To�-anliouse proposal. F�e said that the reason the t�vo garages 50' fLOm A1ei.ster Road �acre se�t so close to i�his road was b�cause o�C the i�oi�oc�raphy of the area. r9r. Boardman said the Soutliern elit bff East Bavarian Pass �,as quite stcep, and if this exi_t wasn't so steep, some of the traffic could go this way to 1�Zeistei Road. I-Ie said the Ci�ty would like to see two good exits from East Bavarian Pass. Mr. Wiley asked ii there couldn't be another access that � would join up witli the service drive for the Heri�tage of Innsbruck Nursinc� Flomc? Mr. London said the prol�lem with trying to li�ve an acccs� in this location was that �ae would 1�c� talking al�oui: � ano�her extension that w�nt into Ne�a Brighton, anc:� as thei:e �aeren't any raad patterns established in thi.s area in New Brighton it wouldn't be a solui:ion now, .but ultimately thcre could be an � ' � �". � � � � � � � � � Planning Commission Meeting - March 17, 1976 Page 20 � access at that point. 3 IC Mr. London said the IV and V Additions would be annexed by the present Townhouse Association, with all private roads. MOTION by 5cott, seconded b� Peterson, that the Planning Commi_ssion close the Public Ilearing on Innsbruck North Townhouse V Addition, by Darrel Farr Development Corporaton. Upon a vo�ce vote, a11 votii�c� aye, Chairman Harris declarecl the PubZic Nearing closed at 11:05 P.1�. � � Mr.. Peterson asked if there was any way that the 24' road that was the extension of North Innsbruck Drive could be widened. Could the City obtain a larg�r eas�ment so this could be widened � to at least 36 feet? Mr. London said the City had a 66' easement for this road. 1�1r. Peterson said they had been under the imPression that thi.s v�as only a 24' easement. He said that this made a lot of difference hecause there was room to widen this street and even put in sidewalks. Nr. P�terson raised a point of information, and asked Cha_irman Harris what action they could i:.ake on this plat. njr. Harris said they could recoru�lend app��ova1 of the pZat �aa_th stipulations, or they could ma}ce a recommendatioi� for a resolution an particular problems. Mr. Peter�on said he �a�s still in svmpathy vaith AZr_. Farr "in developing this plat, but becaus� of the discussion we have had on the 15C0 feet of unsa�e road, and the fact that �ae i�ow find that the City has a.66 ft. easement for this road, he would Ii)�e to see: some �ype of resoltition that ��.ould express i�Ize concern of the nlanning Commission to the City.Cauncil on behalf �of the citizenr_y, and that we v�ouJ_d like to see a street put in on that ease-ment that c��ould meet all the Cii�y specifi_cat�ions for a public street, that cauld be a shared cost of_ the City and the dPVeloper, or ]�y an agreement that could be worked out �iiih the developer, so th�t we don`t ha.ve this continuing problem. Chairman HarLis said this could be handled as a separate item, but for himself, h� would li.):e to study this 15D0 feet further, and he didn't tllink he wanLcd to st�e the approval of this plat held up, while this road problem was beinc� studied. He felt i�his road affect:ed the entire area, and shouJ_d be handled separat�� from the Plat. N'_r. Petel-son said that his problem �,ras that he approved of the p]_at, but he couldn't vote in favor of it, when there wasn'� an adequate road to get the people in and out. r4rs. Sporre said ihere should be some assurarice given to the people who �aould be buying thr-_se townhouses, that there was an adequate road to provide fire protection also. Mr. Harris said he agreed, but this was such a large and important issue, he thaught the road proUlem needcd more time spent on it. Mr. Petcrson said he would like to make a mction to apnrove the plat, and make one of the stipulations that their be a:�olution to the 1500 feet of road in New IIrighton withii� a cerL-ain time fram�. � �. � �` � Planning Cormnission Mecting - March 17, 1976 Page 21 3�- � MOTIUN by Peterson, secondect by Scott, that thc PZanning Commission recommend to Council anpr.oval of. the proposed plats, R.S. 1176-OI, .Tni�sbruck North Townl�ouse IV and V Additions, by Darrel 11. Farr neve.iopmer�t Carpor.�tion, bcing a replat of Outlot il, Innsbruck North Add.itian, gencrally Iocated South of Innsbruck North Townhouses, Phase I, II, and III, with the following stipulat.ions: 1. 2. Provide easernent for public trail adjacent to neighborhood park. P1an syecifications for stre�ts and utilities are to be subrnitted to the City for approva.Z. 3. Off-strcet parking of 4.25 stalls per unit be provided on �hv_se units fronting the 2�' streets. 4 s��aces sha11 re prov_ided �,�ith each individtra] unit, the additi�na.Z spaces should be provided in close proximity to the affected units. 4. Darre] A. Farr Developmrnt Corporation �•�i11. provide recordablc 1eyaJ. docomcnt�tion notifying purchaser that there rt�i11 be no noisc buffer provided from inter- state traffic noise. 5. Trai1 development and trail lighting wi11 be completed c,�it1� landscapiny of adjac�nt units. � "6. One tennis court wiil be pr.ac�.i.ded on I�ssoc�at.ion propert� and �•�il_1 be compJ.eted caii=h ihe completion of construction of ihe fiz-st 20 units in P1�ase IV. � 7. Une to� .Zot wi11 be provided on Association property in Innsbrvck Idorth To���nhous� )_"V al�d i� kdditians wit1� the completion of the first 20 U111t5 in �hase V. � �, � � 8. Cit� t��i1� require a standar_d performance bond for exterzor� develo1�m`nt (p�ths, liyl�ting, tennis court and tot lot) of 50% of the antic.i,��ated cost. 9. That �aithin one month, the City administration and the Darrel Farr Develo�ment Corpor.ation present a proposal to the Planning Commissiori for a solvt�on to the I500' extension of ?dorth Innsbruck Drive to Silver. Lake Road. (Rs any proposal for this extension would have io be at the Cit� Councal's direction, this one month time period would have to be from April 5, 197G (C'ouncil meeting) to Ma� 5, 2976 (PZa��ning Comn�ission meeting) . UPON a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Boardman said the inteilt of the 9th stipul.ati_on was that this proposal comc back to tl�e Planning Commission for actios� at that time. Mr. Peterson said thai� was the intent of this st�.pulation. 0 _� � � � Plannin Commissio.n Meei�in - March 17, 1976 Page 22 � Mr. Boardman said i�he units which would be built.in units of two were basically the same as the townhouses that had been developed in Phase I, II, and III. Mr. London said there would be basically two types of buildings in the 4th and 5th Additions. He said �na parageould be to have the two units separai.e and connected by g from the This type of Uuildinc� would fit on land that sloped up street. He said where the,t�-ao buildings were Joined together would be �aher_e the land sloped down from tiie street, and would be generally the walk-out type. Mr. Scott asked the price range of the townhouses in these plats. Mr. London said they would be in the $40,000 to $50,000 price range. Mr. Lor.don said these �?lans h� :�e .been taken to the North Innsbruck Townhouse Association, the ArchitECtural Contr_ol Corrunittee, and we got a lot of recommendations from them which have been inc.orporated into the plans for the new development. We did get the approval of this Committee. � Mr. Boardman said the staff felt that the designs of the townhouses in these plats were compatible with the existing units. � Nir. Farr said the revised figures .for these to�ar�houses would make the cost trom $�}5,000 to $GO,000. He said the units were exparzdabl_e, and could be as 1arc�e as 5 bedrooms. �• He said tl�e biggest unit had 2240 square feet and the smallest . unit �•, as about 14 0 0 square f eet . � �_� Mr_. IIoardman said these were no� the structural plar_s. They would be submitted at the time uuilding permits were requested. .3 �1 Mr. Scott saic� he had some concerns about t�aV����eed rai�,ge of tl�e costs of these units. It tet�d� to q towards one s}�ecif-ic group. He said that the Human Resou�ovicle Commission felt •t11ai: with innovative d�signs they could p for n�ore variet�y �Lo provide for a br_oader range of income levels. � Mr. I'�r_r read from a 1974 study by the Metropolitan Council on Planned Unit Developments (PUD). He said tlzis was on housing costs: Ii� read "'It was difficult Would bentle townhous�es ato of: 1� the highcst priced PUD s, but one homes Cedarview witll a i�op price of $65, OQO and t11e sinqle family � of IT111Sbruck North �el�ich may aell �OTicp vouldOin�Clude �3riarwaod, � Developmezzts having a diversii:y o� P Innsbruck NorLh, Shellview, and Eagle Lake. Th90c�o�o�24n��'�.S of B�iarwood in Gol:^� Valley sel�illrrent for5$149 to $2p8 a � The Innsbruck Nortfi R�artm�ntS month. I� townhouse m<<y be purchseemaf�beasurchasedain$the�r�an5e � and a s inc� le f ami ly dci:ached hou y. P of $50,000 to $80,000." Mr. n�aevelo ed,lorWi�titrincludedawhat �, read pextaincd to what had bee P �; � Planninc Coilunissi:on Meetin - March ].7, 197G Pa e 23 � � � � ��� was being proposed in this plat, and woula what was in i;hG•.. same touanhouse assoca.ai�ion be considered as one Planned Unit Development. Mr. IIoardman said that tlie Planned Unii: llevelo�ment was all of Innsbruck that Mr. Parr developed. TIZe preliminary plann�d development that �vas approved by the City included the single family area, the townhouse are�, and the apartment area. This has been c�nstructcd in phases, Uut it was all one planned developmeni�. lIe said he didn't thinY, you could judqe this by ju:�t one part of this development. � 3 r� 1407'ION b?� Feterson, secor�ded l�y Bergman, tliat tlie Planning Commission recommend to Counc.il approval of a townhouse developi:�ent � of 100 units, T-r'i76-0.�, by Dr�rrel A. �•Tarr Development Corporation, for IJlnshrucl; North TownPiouse IV and V 1ldditions. �?�Zr. Berznan s��id that Yie feli� that in the contexi� of the � total plar�, that ti�er_e was u very broad price ranc�� in this development. � � DSr. Scott said that �ahen he loo}:ed at the total d�vel.opment he sa��� pockets oi thi� group 11V1T1CJ hc:re, and another_ group 1ivi.zg thcre, each group beiriq of a certain income range. He said tha� in his o�inion this was stereoL-ypeci planning, and he could see this developin�� �l.e sarne as one group on one sicie of the t�racks and another grcup on the ocher side of the tracks. Fie said he c,Tould lil>e ta see a broader range of l�ousixzg ior a largzz rang� o.f inccme gr.oups. P�ar. Farr s<��_c� t.h�;L this developm�nt ccvey�ed 60 acr_es, anci he t.hought t;.zat .in thcse GO acres this dcvelopr�l�nt did meei� that cr_iteria, an:�i this �a��s a fully integrated coir�rnunity. He said tt,.at: in the same artic.le lze had r_ead froni beror�, it cites Inizsbrucic Narth as a fully integrated development as to styl_es ot housing, anc� price rangc�. PZrs. Sporre said she fel�L this �alzolc� development offered a variety oi' life styles. Slz� saici th<zt peo�le who bought into a townhousc� developmc�nt we.re buyi.izg i.nto an e.;clusi.on ar�a, an.d dia so uecat�se they w�ritecl to be in a}�i; ivate are� . SI�e thougl�.t thi.s fii� into the housing ��lan, uecause it di.a meet the needs o� people who wanted a di_ff.er_eiit life style, and Fric�ley shoulcl be proud that tlley can offer suc)z a c�evel�pment. UPON a voice vote, �erym�n, Harris and Petersoti votin_q aye, Gabe.Z abstaining, and Scott voting nay, the mo.i:'ion carried. � � 4. CONTINtTI;D: PUT3LIC 1-Ir11P.ING: CONSIDl�,R71TION Ol' 11 PRLLII�IIN�1R�` _ . PL11T, P.S. #7G-02, :iNNSt3P.UCI: VTT,I:,I�G1:, 7�1' D�1I�RI.;L 11. '.,11RR DLVLI�OPi�ll?N`,' COI:POIZ�1`1']:ON: E3eing u replat of Uutloi� B. , Tnnsl�ruck North ��ia�.t�on, along with Lot 49, except the �acsterly 210' of Auditor's Subdivisian No. 92,_ generally located North of Nortli Innsbruck Drive and Wesi: o� . the Blacl: Foresi: 1lpartment. Public IIcaring closed. � ,. J � � II �' '� � Planninc� CO1T11111� ;ion rlcei�iiic� - M�:ir_ch 3, 1976 Pac�e 4 talkincJ aUoUi� t.h�-�t in the tui:ur.e of closing 53rd Avenue intersection �zi�c1 ]�avc sicfi���]_iz<-�tivn at 51.si� 1lvenue. She L-t�ouc�ht that Mr. Seeger shou].d ccrtainly di_,cuss tl�iis proposal_ wit.h the County, bccaus� this waul.c� l�ave �-� grcat impact ta t�he acc�ssib.i lii�y to the two retail esi:abl.i�hmc�nts. Mr... Seeqer s.�id tf�e sic�n:� th�zt ttie C,ounty h��d put up f_or the lcft turn h�:u {.akcn a.lmosL. 9 months oi cliscussion to gct. If he h�c� to t��or}c out �i p;_o}�o��i.l c}aitli thc� Cou»i��� he wonclercd if: they coulcln't ��uL- up thi.s Ui.11l_�oarc� in ��he in�cri_m. Mr. Boardman said tliis coul: n't be h�a.ndlc�d that �aay. P•?r. Hunt s�?i_d that� Plywood I��iirineso��.i used i�o hav� their o�vn si.c�iz, b«t i� blr�:�� c?oc;Tn. Iri a�.t:en�ptii�g to replace i.i�, thc�y �•,er.e tac�-;�ri, ar,d so h�:�a come up ���i�:h this propos��.l to share a sign with C->>i_r.kF,� ,a�ci any ot-1�F�r hus�_i-�F�ss l.l�a{; n�ove�? i_rii.:o tl�is �_rlc�tzsi:�:i_a� pUrk. A1r. See�er� az;d i��r. Hunt �:c:�e in ac��-ec�nent �.h��t trl:is request ' could k��_� coni=itll-�ed t�J,t�_I, th��y couZd ta1l� �co th� Coizn�y. They said t}�c:y �a��uld li}�e ��lzi,� to be on the �g�nc��a f_or t�}.Ze next i<<ee�ir�g. � 1707'IO1V by P��i:c=rson, seroTlded r�� 6-.-'ahlber_q, that t1�e .Planning Co;r�.niss?on cor,tin�.e ui�ti.1 i>iarcf� 17, 1976, t1�e regizest- for. a Special USC' Yc�1'1:7� L � SP >i I �- 0% � .tJy �'_l �j t�Too:� :�ill"I:1C'SOt�1 , .IT1C . . . L� � � T•ii°.. �3cx-gma» said that he caar� �.� d 1-1��� pei.i-ticner to not� tnat the rep�acinq or thG sign �-aa; jtzst a part. .of the }.��-oblen?. He thoug}i'c the pe-citio;-,ers ac�r_e�d �h��.t tl�e iden.ti_fica�ion of tizis ar_ea ar�d the -L-�_affic probl�rn ��,-as a}�ic;c��r p?-oU_l;?no IGZr. Seeger said Iie �:�a�� most conr.el.n�d abc�t!t lzis o;,.r� l�usinc.�ss. I1e sa�_c1 th�y �aant thei� busi.ne�,s r�coynizcc bcca}.��e t1;ey G•���.r_c� -t:h� peop�e who tr�ze gener_ating th� tra�fic in. the a�-ca. Thc�y �aere �aillir�g to s'hare thi� sic;n �,zith any neta bzl�zness tr�at movea in�o i�hi_s area. Ii� !said he �aould try to �•;ork ou� sor,u� -�yp� of j oi�zi� ac�i cerz;ent: wi L-h i�he County . Mr . Boa.rcx,aa.n said the City rng�_ne.ering Departn�ent should be involved in this ag�eer,lenL a1so. � Mrs. taahlberg s��id that the �lanl�inc� �Comnlission undel°stood the �. haxcishi_}� that these t�ao retail busin�s:�es had in direci�inr people to the en�rance, but they wanted the peopl� i�o get to these businesses in a sa�� manneL. � � ' � ' UPON a voice vote, a11 votinq a�e, the iirotiori carried un�nimously. 2. Ft„I_F it��'1R7I�?G�: LOi�S7I?rRI�TION. OI' A PRELIMINARY PL71T',� P. S. �' 76-O�NN�I�I:UCI� NOI:Tii TO�'dNIIOUSP: TV AND V ADDI'I'IONS, L3Y �}�t�i"L �1. �'11P.R Di;G'L•'LOP"iL;NT COh��OIZi'1`1'ION: I3c�inc� a rep.Lat of Outl.ot I-I, Inrisbriick No'rth Addition, generally Iocated South of Tnns�ruck North To�anhouses, Pli�zse I, lI, and III. 3. CONSIDI'?�n`�'Tn^: CF 11 TnWUIIOiISI: DTVI'LOPMP;NT Or 100 UNTTS, Z'- #76-�01. BY llI�1�1:}�I., i�. �I'�1f:T: I�1:\'h:l.�(�l'i�l1:N'i' COI:PO1:11'1.']:ON, FOIt TNNS33RUCK NO1:'1'II � �ro�aNiiou:;L �:v .4 v n��u-i-�i�i.CiNS , � ' �' �� ' Pl.anni_n___c��Corrunis�;�_�rl_ I�iceti.r�q=_..March 3�..�.]_976_�_ Yaqe 5 Mr. Darr.el 1�'��rr a.rid PRr.. Jim Lonr�on we�°e prescnt. 1i07'TUN by (l��hlber.g, sccondcd bc) Pe�t:erson, f.hat t:he Commi.ss.ion oper� ihc Pitb.Z.ic ileciriny un a propasr�d �.l.��t:, I� I�ii�sb.rvcl: !�'vi•Lh 1'v!4�nl�ou�:� 1.V ,�1id V�'�d�l.if:iolls, 1�y n�r.r��1 7)evelv�,�rnenL Corpc�r�aLson. Uf>o» a vo.�.re vote, �a1.1 vni:rnr Ilarris dec.lared tlic� Yt�til.ic Ile<�ring open aL F3:.Zf3 P.t�l. � , �J � � � � � i P1�nnin�� I�.S. �{76-01 �l . I' a x r a���� Chaiz°nz�zi2 I<;r. Ro��-dm�r� s��:icl t}-lat: t.hi.s 1:CC�U�?S�: c•�as �o.r th� devcl.oi�ment of: �00 to>ai�housG i.zr.i_ts. Thesc� �:dc7il-io.�� ��;oula be phase IV ��zzci V of L-iz� �oi_aI to�•,�nho�,���� cicvr�:l.c;}�mcnt. Tt�_ ..c� 100 t�nits :��ould be part oF thc pl"C'.SCi2t: '1�0�4i1}10U:iC:' /1S:iOC;]_i%�,:LC�il ctT�C�'ii. Ij•' u�11C'� t,r]�'t �I1C.' IJl"C'�T1.OUS �"�ic�?"'� for_ t11�.r ��rea h�td t;�e.7 to }�.�vc 118 to�,;�ilhouses in ilii.s area. T�i i:11�, ne�a �1,� �z , tlie l U 0 to�,.ri�zo�l-c� tzizi. tC �,:�oulcl " be bu:i_ 1. � in grou,�s of t4•�c, . �l'ti1C? YUc«1 t?ci'L�C,'ii7 �.}1--:i= �'J�2S C�_CVG� OL?�..i Ui7 �:�7��5 ��1 �'it. LN011�_Ci �:'C'. �.l�iSlC�111.�� t})E? Sc:'_�1.? 1;'Oc;:Ci L��li'.i'c?Yl� 111 ��:C'C'VlOUS :.�1�'V�'_!Oj�Ill�'I7�:�i. �.1'�.��T �'70U�.C: St:L�_� r v�� t:��� 1.:�: �.r�; � _._ t_ �,A._ � 1.-.- Z y <<.� U1� � .� . � uI l.iaii 1 c2::��> vl) �1i7 111 u11Ci Glii: �.r T1C1_,r_-,' �E�Y' ���Jci�i 7_1C� i_..1.� L L��l��c�1 li?.?7 T�u.�S C;S07.:1.Cj C�O'��,?Z �O �11C Cll�adromi.l:LUIi1S . 'I`h:i_s t.-ies i.r� �Tcrl �.Tell �:itii ti�� r>re�.�io��s pro7.�o�al. P9?�. Darrel Pa�-2: said t?iis i:c�plat. ��.as b�sicall}� similar, if not almos�. i:?er.tical,t�, �h:.� plt�.t. �th�t 1-iac�. been pa=nvious app�-oved by th� City. Si_nc:c the i�i�_ �_i�-;.l at�'�>?^o�al , ��.��:Lch �•aas �thx.-ce plus yea.rs aqc�, w� h��.'�' czc�ci��; d ti�?a� t.he �a��d ����as ri�t st�i�.�d co as m��ny �u:its as ��JE' t'lc"3C. j�_L«1?.I-t^Ci r�E:CailSC'. aite7� �ubt?.r��,�r. »T1CTir��cri.rig �]_l�.'_• �}1C.C� tl"1G QG�V-C.'�.Ci7i'ct:,'il� OY'c`iCil.]'IC� i�l.�;ii� t.�7C_' eili=.lrl, Slt.�;: LJ�S ��ZTI?USt �i11 C11� ?T1C�1 �11�. �j� ..�'�c.�.7_::� "trlE: �1`1C:"lA:=' �- rY'Or�O.��?� �':�:'.: �l�� � �1_:C i.U\�i)2i.QL?.`,�tyS j•?Ot1 � C� }JE �U7_�t in ?� tv .8 uni�s �s i1� the oi�ne:� phases. Tlie rc��sozz -�hey �e�nt to 2 ur.it d�ve� opmei�t i_n th�� s ne�•, plzt �����:s so �thc�y maintain a gr_cater diL�erez���i.al f_rorii c�ne Uui7_dinq to anoi.;,�L so thai. hopef_ully they coulc� pr_�ser�=e and save a gr�ater nu7zl�er o� t�he trees. AZr. Boar_dm�n said the Ci-�y Naturalist l�ad o�fered hiti �,�svices to Darrc�l Farr �3s far Gs providi.nq �nformatiozl and llis kno�-�l�c�g� in preserving as mai�y trees as possible. ' i�ir_ . Bo�z�_dman said the si�i�?ulatioris that. had been agre�d upon by the City and ttic Larrel Faz�r_ llevc�lop����ent Corporaii�n were. l. Provide Easc�meni� �or public trail adjaccnt to izeighborYiood park. 2. The plan s}�ecificatio�zs for streets and utilities are to be submittcd to the Cii�y for approval. 3. Off-street parking of 4.75 stalls per unit be provided on � those. unii�s fr.ontinc� on 24' street. 4 spaces shall be provided :��:.�.t'� each individual unii�, i:l1e additional spaces should be . provided in close proximity to the a��ected units. �, � � 4. Darrel �. I'arr Development Corporation will provide recordable legal docum�ntation notifying purchaser that there wi11 bc no noise buffer pr.ovi.ded �zom interstate iraffic noice. 5. Trail development and trail lighting will be completed with landsca��ing of adjacen� units. 0 ' I.�I.c'lIllll.)l(j Con�mi;si_on Mec�ta.ng - M��rr.h 3, 1976 Pac�e G 6. Rc�c�u�.rc� stancl�tr_c� performancc boiid for e};i.crior dcvc:lopment � '(patli� � 1-1C�I1L].I1C�, tennis caurt anc� i:ot 1oi�) o� 50 � of the ai�itici.pated co..f�s. � PZr. I3oardman said t.he.re wcre tt-ao oi�her si�:i_pizlai:ions to provic��� � terkni.s court and tot� lot on 7lssoci_��xt.iori propc�r�Ly, whi.cti had Ucen agrec�d to . ASr_ . Iir.��.-r.is s��i.d t.his �:-ould bc a private r.oad system as on ��rcvi.ous dc'VelGpitlLrii: Of the ta��anhouse area. Mr. Pe�ersori a�}�e�d i.f i�here was.n't. a prio.r_ agrcement that t���o i�ennis eot�:r.L-s woulcl be a:�rov:i.�3ed tl���t: wc�ulc� bc for -L-lie us� of the public -L-h�.�t WGU_i_��I7't be on AssOClc"1�'.LOI1 propert-y? Mr. 13��oadman s�:i_d L-h�t o?z �t_he ncxt plai� on t.he agei�da, cahi_ch �zad p.r_ev:ious].y ��e� n r�ropo�e�.i t:o l�e us��d fo.r �. 251 unit a�>ar_ l-.�i�ent bui �.d? n j, -L-f;���r� s;s:i:, ��: a;��c�crnent tiz�� �-1:�.�o t�nn�_:; court.s ti=ould be built a.�� Ci.�y p��.i};. pro;�e:��t�:�. `.t'l�is ac�rc��;r�ent ,�;i_1.1. holcz over �n thc� n�.�.. pl�t. 'r�r. �o�>>�c�,,l��;n �a:i.0 t��" Cit�Y� s�r.veyo�`:� ���c;uld 1:��: gc�ing oul:. to chcc;� to see :if therc c•:��:.� enough rvc,r:� izl tJ�c adjacc�i4- neigi�borhood �:?cil}i �01" �l� -C'SC� t:;'O �:C11;"!1� Cbt1Yt.5. )�E.' Sd]_C'1 i:lict'G l� t',�1G':CC� �Vc1£i11 � t. Y'O::lil f o.r thcrl t�I^.: re, they �aou? d i�e i_�� close p�_ o�.�_n�i.t�T, they ���au1d be a.�1 Tt>>�:;brucl: North Pa_�lc, ��:li:ich �aas ju:�t Nor-L-h cf -L-his d��velapmerit. h1r. Pe+�ei-son s�z �d it �a����r,' t too lor7g ago t.h�j� i�he Par_i,:s & Rec.r���t:iof� CQl?11Tt1S51i�i� ;"iuC� u Ci�;�.C'Cj�At.lOi7 i Y'07;1 17111 �';�I'UC''; I�OY't.rl 311C�. c?t �llat 1:1_l:le th`se p�:o��le ���e��e u.z��er_ tl:c� i_n:p�-esszor_ that i.'�ese t_cnnis cov.r-�:s shou�id h�:��,�e alLe�:�dy Lcen put in. H� �ti-ould ]��c� in�t�ere��-ted in ha�.�_inq i•�r. Izoardrn_��n giv� t7ic i�.'�m�_ng oi tl�.e cons L-ruction ot thcse courts . i�ir. I3oarr:�man sa_'r.d the�c tenrlis cour_ts h.a��c al�aays been t�ed to thc dev� J_o��>i:�:ent of Pl;�?�;e _�V and V o� the to,�rr�i�ouses and the construction of i_i�.c `Z`il unit apas-�.i:ent: b12i1di_ng. Mr. Pe;�crsan said he didn't t�hink this h�:d b�en pointc�.� out to ��.he peop7_e in Innsbz�uck, because t�1C` Yc"?I}.S S� �CC.i"c_'�ai�10I1 C(�7IiT(11SS1017 �1c15 }l"c�.Cl l�l"L'.SSUY'C� �OY_' i:WO years. about t}ie cons�tructi.oil o� tliese ten�zis courts. This was the reason for h�_s ques �ion . Mr. Bergman said all of Otitl�t H���as zonea R-3. Was this any � infringemen�L on the R--1 p�_ope�-ty? Mr. 13oardmzn said i_t wasn``L-. Mr. Bere�r��aii aslced Air. Boa�-dmzn to e::plain �.o tlz� audience what was � involvea in the a}�proval of_ a plat. ' � � A7r. I3oardm�il s�id the process stari�ed aut as a preliminary p]_aL. Tlie Ptibli.c Iiearinc� on a p�-�lirninary plai� was before the Planning Comm�_ssion. At thai� time, they took a lool: at the grades, locaL-ion of structures, sewer and watr_i� services, and the type of facilities such as tennis courts aizd tot lots, ei�c. , and tried to tie everything togethcr in this area. Iie said the next step would bc the iinal plai:, cahich would be considcred at a public hearing by the City Council. Mr. Iioardman said that when the rezoning`took place on this property, � it was alw�iys consid�red as a townhouse development, but the 12-3 zoning allowed' for a hic�hcr density. As �.he devel�per will be having .1.CJJ units on this site than was originally proposed, the density will meet � Planni_n��^Comrni:;ri��n,Mectiriq - Mar.ch 3^, 197G Page 7 the • I2-1 dc�nsii�y recSui_rement_s . Mrs. ���ahlbe�i-c� ��ii:r_1 that 5he rea1.�_ccd tllai �.his ��rea has k�e�n p].anncd far this type oL dcvelopmen#� all alang, but the thing slie wa:; r.oncea-n�d a}�oui� w<:�s the traifa_c flow. Shc saicl t}iaL �ssentially all t.%���c roads f.iriizel out ta North 1:nnsbruck Drive. The t..raft.ic. ir_ont ivo��t.li =Cniz�,Urur.k llrive tlicn goes t�Jcst out on to Mattcrhorn or 1�7c�st. o!.i� onto Si.lvcl: Lakc. I:oad. She said th��i. whai� concernec.i her i�h� rno:;i. ��ra , the �.i�rount of traiLic i�hat was a_lready go:ing i�o Silver La):c I:oad. SI��e said shc i-cal.izccl th�.s cxit ��ras iii N�w ].3r. ighton, bu'c it si�ill fit into thc� toi:a]_ p�ttcrn. She �•londered if. ar�yonc in Ne�a Brighton had b�eri coii±�act:cu on i.t�is. P�1r� Jim Loizdon sai.d -tl�ia� �;r�en thc.��� ova��ed �r��� land i.n Tve��1 Br�_c7hton, we h�td a P.lan ro d��vel�p th�� land. b�i��aec�n tne i�ric�ley �..:cz Ne�-o Er.igh�cn �_1T�1�`' "c.tl'?;a. �1�.VG'1 ���i':C_' �Uc7C1. C'1C' �1c3C1 u C�ic111 �17c:'i: �ti�c:� u�_)L�7"OVC.C� .�"'.�y t��1G'. City �to br.:�::� i�,o,_i;)��. Iz>>:s�;i�uc],. Driv� frolr� thc enc� of tll� conc:cete to �}�e Nc-�tid isric�}�co?z �__i_�1��, over t.o ti� i.n ,-.i;:l�i Pal;�,er J:�i.vc. I;e s�.id� th�.t �•�e do ri�t o�:?n i.li� 1ar:c�i no�v and ��o have no control ovcr the� C�.E'_VG'ZQ1):ii�?:1"�. OL t:�iu"L �xI'C-'_u. I�S ��iY' ciS }�r� �t11E,'\-d� �i1G'Y'c Wc�-.S Stil� c? ��Zc.l"1 ii� Nc��a Lri.ghtprl 'co n��a}ce thac co��nect.i.on some d�y �,,I�en th�;.i-_ lai;.c% deve?c�ps It c�ul-d h��.N1 �n soori, o�: i�. coti]_ci be a fevT ye�zr: f-rorn no�a. Righ� no�,r th��e �,Ta� a?z c�avem��nt tic�ing Si_��er Lake Roa« with Ncr_th Inn:�l�rizck br_ ive , a.1d w� iiuvc m��intu:i_n.ed that 7_ «' blacktop street up to date . l�ir_s. VJai.zlberq s�id sl-,e t-las sure triat many peop:Le qv.estioned the nluinten�.nce oi tli��t blac}�top, und she ac;rec�d bcc� u�-e she drove that YOuC� l,<ip.�'i1C1�:1d}J�_�' �l�i'Si�.'1_f. S�7E.' Sa1Ci :i� Wc-iS U.�(�ii ��I OL'ili:�= iiCO�.�iC than ju:.�='c �:�e p�o}?1_� a� Ir?ns.�ruck. She ielt -t�his �•.as �L very vital parf_ of any uevc�Iop;�:�^n� iri t}:ir area, and should be cor.sidered. She said th�:�. if th:�� coL:ld be �icci into Palr�:er Dr_ive, it <<�ould ease i.he tratfic prob:l_em cons�_derak�l.y. Mr . Londor� .>aid their plan wi_t�1 N�w �righ �o�z about a year and a. h�lf ago �,�as tha i: ?7 t�i Avenuc, abou � a Lloc}: t•�est of Silv: r Lai�e Road, ��:o?i_l.d tie iiz with. 1.4t�h, and go on down and c�:oss Nort.h Innsl�ruck Drive ar�c: �•:ould ti.e into t}ie service drive do�an by th� Ford c�ealersliip, c�tc. Thc�re �aould not be a conn�ction �etwc�e�z Tdorth Innsbr_uck D��ivc3 a�c� Si:l_ver_ La}ce P.oac1 as we ]cnow it today. It �,�auld ei:i�her have goi;.� Nori�lz �Lo 14t1z or South to Palmer llrive. Mrs. t�l�illberc� sa�.d that i� that 7.and has been sold to someone else, tllen the access from I�ort�h InnsUruck Dri�Te to Silver Lake Road would become morr vital with addii�ional development in �Lhis area. She said tllis was a major prol�lem now, particularly in the winter ti.mc. She fclt that i_f somei�hing wasn`t done about this, then a11 the traf�ic generated by these new developmcrits would go into �l�e I'ridlcy si�reet sysLem and i�his was something that the City should address itself to. Mr. l3ergman said that. in the adniinistiative staff report it states i�hat West I3avarian Pass and �icister Road would Ue 30' streeLs and all ottler ro��cls in i:hi..� preliminary plai� would Uc 24' . Mr. T3crc�man asked if a 36' taicltli wasn't the stariclar.d width for City resic�ier�ti��l streri:s. Mr. 33oardman said it was, but thesc were privat:e roads. Mr. Baardman said tliere w�,re a loi: o� 30' ���nd 31' residen�ial si:rcet� � Pl.�lnr�i.nc� Commi�.si_on Mc�ting -- Ma��c}i 3, J_97� _ Page 8 .' � � � � � � � LJ � � � � ! �1 ' � r � ' in tlle Ci_i�y alsc�. r7r, l�eram�tn caid i:h�+t if 36' wi_d� si�rc�ts �aere good for tl�ie City v�l�y �aoul.d:-�' t: tt�c�y bc good fo•r a��r_ivat.c, develoi�mcnt. Mr. BoarctJ�l��n said t-.hei°� woii]_c� be a prok.�lem in wi.dening �Yiese roads bccausc� a].l tlte units o.�oul.d have to be mo��cd k�ack. 1Ie saia the onl.y F�rok�lcrn �-lith 24' :�L-rc.c�ts was access for emexgency vchi_cles, but t}ir_r_c� were 4 oif-�trcct ��arkinq stalls for each u�zit, so thcre sl�oulcln' c� be n��uc}� �?��rki.ng on tli�se sL1-�ets. In addition �Lh�re �-�:i.].l be o�-�c morc� �>ta11 provic�ed for eacJz 4 units. Cha:i.rman I;ar.� � s asl:.cd if ttl���� �•�c-.re a11_o�:�.in� ori-st�°eet par}:ing on th.� ?. _' strec�tc>:' ,�I?-. I,o�:clon s�-�i�i tl�ey �•�eren't ��ost�d for 'no parJcinc�' . N?r_ .:3o�rrd,�an sa�_d if tl�c 2�' strc�ei� became a problcm foi. c:;:;^rc��ne�= �jc�?;ieles, he thougiLt the Ci.ty �-�ould a:�l: to hav� them �GStt'C:1 i01 ll0 �3uY''r:ll,ic7. A,i-. fiar.ri_s asl,cca thc �a�.d L-h af thr� r�-gl.t of �•�ay? I�ir < Bo� �-<a:����ri 5d1C1 tl;:_`_:C<_' \^7c1S I�O i"l�T}7i-. O:r GJcl�� U21 nYlVc1�;C� Z'OciC�S.� I`Z:". �ic�Y'Y'1S c1S}:�Ct tr.�hat ���oul:d haL p�:n i= a� sarn�� point in t.ime, t�e. City �aould huv� tQ ��Z�if� OVL?i j:�:E'��:,' I"O��?:�� l�lZ'. �Ocir'C�i11�i7 S"c.'ilC� 't=11n �.'1"��� li.c�S Sd1.C� l:ll�it. the:�' caou7_d ncvcr � ake the:_ c� s�i:re�ts c.�er becatzse tliey c�o no-c mGe � the C_i_f:y specifi�,«'r_i.on,,. T�Ir. Harr_is as?>ed s�.jlzo m�in.t.ained these strcct�? rar. l;oaLdrnz�: s��:i_c� t?�e 1��:�ocia�Lior� took carc of them. I�1-r. lja:rris sa.i_d th�:t i-rom Ltze r..c:actian of.. i�tie atzd�_er�ce, he t��ould suspect that t=1����re was a probl��r.l cai.t:h t}�is, bu�� i.f there was a-request for �lic City to take over �iic.se si�ree�.s, i�heri th� City ���ould not do it. Nr�. Pc�rgman s��ic3 tl����.t zf J�e .reme�nbered correctl1� from 3-+• years ac�o, he �houc�hc tJ.;.c�re �•,-��s disczxssi_en. tha� tl.�ESe st.rce-ts ��aould i��et th�� City speci C i.c� t.ior�s , so that the Ci L-y take-over of thcse strec.ts would I�e feasi}�1_e. r1r. Dotig V�.i�-� Az:)cel, 5563 East Ba.varian Pass, President of tlie � To�anhous� nssc�r.i_ation, s�>id l�e �•aould lil�e to discuss problems �Lhat the l�o`�rd o.f_� Dir_ccLors h�Y.;l not�d �•aith this dev�Iopment. He said it had been disc�t�ss�d t.}:�ai� t_l��.s be developed in. a h�rmonious ��.id � nvior��ment=a].1�� �;oLtnd mar�ilcr , but the big problem was ttle roads . He said ih�y had t�oo problei:�s �•aith the roads at� present. One was a short term problem. `i'ne roac�s tl:at �•aerc alread�� constructed in the area now w��°e to bc �t�aint��:ii�ed Uy the I�ssoci'ai�ion. There would be no way for constl_,uci: ion vehicles to gct l�ack to the ar�a under discussion, to ue dc�vcloped �vithout using the e:�ist�ing roads. We hlve no firm commi.trnent to t11e respol�si bi1.i ty ot repa�_ring roads dam�ged by tliis heavy cc�uipment other than a verbal agr�ement. We have experienced alanq with the Darrel I'arr DevcloZ�ment Corpo.ration, the develoi:?ment problem� of the last two years. The problcros he has experienced, w� have experienccc3. If construction equipment should do exces�ive damacJ� i�o our existing roads, we do not icel that it should Ue the responsibility of the 1lssociai.ion to rcpair them. IIc said that if the development did not go as nicely as everyone ho1�ed it woi�l.d, and the dc�veloper didn't havc money i�o pay for these rep�lirs, then �his would bc a serious p7�0���.�'-1ll for t.hc I�ssoc9.ation. Iie sai.d thcy were se�king some assurance thzt thesc streets would k�e r.epaired. Mr. Van Arke1 said i�he long range problem with the roads w��s that he was not under the impression that tlie roads met thc City standards as L-'ar as � � ' I] � , Plar�ni�tc� CC7R1111].�_Sion�M��cL-.�.nci - M�.u:c}� 3, l�)7G Pt�c�e 9 th� � top coat. ]3�� s��icl wr have becn living ��itli the width of tlie strec:t:�, and hc=;�upposcd t�hc�y ���c�uld contintie L-o liv� wi_th it. S^?e qucsti_oil whc�ther i�hc�sa rc���cls ��G�-e constr.ucl.ccl t.a City spc:ci�ir.atior�s c�u t.0 :�L1Y.'f i.lC12"1C( Ui �CS1.C�C'Ilt:l.'cl�. �tT��'C�}S . IJ(' ��il1C� t�l�it: c1s tlie ��.'G�rJ]1t10USG' �SSOC:I�I�:lOI1 �ai15 CjU].IIC.J t0 I�C'. I:'�'.S}JO1"157-��1.C' �U1 ill�.].11tc�lI1.L1�(� t:rl(3 Sj.-.r'CE'.tS i.n fi11c ncw adc?:i t�.i.on, and they .�a�3r,i:.cc1 to mak� sur.e th��t what wc have to st.��L t, tai.th tvas n-�aini_ain�ibJ:e, f. or tllc ainc>uiit: of traL-fic tl�iaL- L-1-icse Stx'cCt.s wer_'e cjc�i.ng t.o gct�. ifir. V��n I�r},c�l. sa:id t.l.c oth�r_ �;�-01:�7.em w��s just sam�thing which he cotllc� just, a;;)c i:or co�_��,c_.r�.t_�on i-z-om L-he 1'1�.1r1iii.nr� C�?rJnissiori, and � c- � c;r <'j .� � �- > 1IC Sr11Ci t.}lil�: 1_l lt tCCi}': th<:�t G•.,.i.� th•� �ic�c�� t.o ��_ l��r L��t�.c I.o<<d. ?., � o�. 5 yca-r:� l�c��o��:� i.lzc l�:e�.a 7�.-iyliton pro7�c..ty wa� cic��clop��c':, �•r=ho wi]..l rn�_� i.ntain t�h<<i, ro-_�d. I�e a�kec1 ii th�� C'�_�Ly of I'x�ic�lcy rea1.; zcd that: i:.):c F:ssoci�t;c�n w�,zld r�ot t.a},e on .i��i� rc�Z�onsi_ui.�_a_L-y af �l�e maizi�e>>>:�:�ce o�- ��h_�z�;� roac?, arid .�_�c r.<�.y have to b� blo�.l�cc? up. l�e s�;ic3. that_ �v���.l one u_i� lt:i:sbrucic wou7.d -th�r1 have L-o usc t.i�.e ���iesterl�� rcute in ?�'_idi��1�� 1�5��. V�n lii:',;c�l suid t.��:.�t ar.cL-l��c:r. proUlc?��; th� I�s�o.;i.at?on �•aas � P_X�JC.'1"1P.i1(�lI1C_j \� ;�� �iZC' j7c''_� �_I7CJ �aCI 1-1_'I:iCS �07' tilC.` Y_'CCtC'c1tlOT1 C�i1tCY'. Z.'l1CV �3)'E? i:C)"�c� i.i_L' 1I���C11 CZliu�::'.`_.'.� c:T1G 1? )'i.i11_]1CJ7 11�?S ��C'F'l1 QiJ?"lc �O E'_ciSl3 �r1iS Pro�le�l. IIe sa -i.0 Lhe�_c tia�.�.+s roo�n �or_ i_he par.l>i_;�g of anpra�iir�a �.e �-Y 1Q aut.ol�o}�ilesr and t.�.cc�r: �:�:id�ned 1�';ciszez ko:-.d as it appr��chcd tl:ie � recrc:a�.ion buildi_r�g. �Ve ha�-e a:�l-ec�r l�u� v�le 7�,_-zve nct r.ec�ivect alzy suppor� frc.,� th� c��ve.lo}_,e�-, to ��a�e i.: e par.}cinc; f�cilities in,_.reasc:'�. I��I��C. P�a'�11,e��g saic� rl��::,t she }��c�lic�ved -L-h�+_t rerrca.tion cent�er had been us.ed by outs�.de peisoy�s. Sl:e sa�ci t11at sYze remer:�l�ered i�i�a-i= th�>>_e h�d bcen ai� In?_�rbruc�� }�out_i,�t<e sale held in. fhis bui.1_ding. NIr.. Vai� Arkel said tn���, he l���czr: ` � i�een ir�.volvec� in tiZat, but he uelieved -L-h�y had tra� fic n;a,zitors c:urin� �hat sale, to hclp ea,c the tra�fic flo��. D�Ir . MiJ;e ,S���en son , 1: 4 9 G Noi th I nnsbruck Drive , s a id that he had ta�ke�a to the m:,your of Ne�a I3riql,i�on� and he had assured hi.m that� New J�.r_igliton �1��.� not going to maintain thc .extentiori of �Iorth l;z:isbruck Drivc� to Si]_vca- La]�e Raad. He saS d-that if ev�7`yone �aho lived i.n thc apartments, the tot,�n?.c�uses, and the sinc�l� family ar�a hac� to come 1�7est on Nori:h Iiznsbi-uc.k Drive, its going to lool{ li)ce Ceni�ral Avenuc� . Mi. Harris asked what kind of_ condition that extension �•:as in a� the preseilt time. Mr. Swenson said that it: was very bad. ITe said t.hai� when txiere had l�een a sno�afall, ii� was about 4' hic�h�r on the sides than it was in the middle. It was like a uig c�iish��an. Mr. lt��rri.s askcd how widc this cxi.cn:�lOIl �aas. Mr. Swenson sai.d it was about 24' . Mr. Iiar.ris asl:ed how wide ii� was pl.oti�ed to. A1r_s. Wahlbc.r.g said slie thougizt it was abou�L 1G' , but it was an exi_r_c�nely danc�e.rous road for aiiyonc to travcl, with ir.e. She sai.d tllat �ali�n you rnec�t someone on tliis road, }�OLl try to c;ci: as i'ar to the riqllt as you can, bui: if you sl:ide down, ana it w��s very possible to do that, you coll.ide. She said the m��i.ntenan�e has nat been goocl on that road, ancl ii: was u�ed exte�lsively. Chaiiman Tlarris asked w}io was �'esponsib]_e for the mainten��nce of that road. Mr. Swensoii said ii. was de�initely not Ncw IIri.c�liton, � . '' Pl'anniil� Cou�rnissi.on Mc�c�L-�.ng - A��lrch 3, 1�7G _ Pac�e 1.0 because it was a private road . M.r . Van I�rke7_ said this �i ivat.e ro��d ' 'c�i.d I10� bclor�c� tc� thc 1lssaciai�:i.on, so tYiey wou]_a a,s.ume i�o responsiLi7.ity for the maintcilance. � ' � � � , Chair.man fl��rris askcd Mr. London i.f �t was the devcloper's respoizsibili�t;y to maint�in i.hi.s road'? IIe said i�ll�i� road has to k��l.onc� to so�Y�cbody. rsi-. Lonclon said hc clic:iii't know if_ it� was their re ;��onsibli_ty. He said tricy had sperit quitc: a bii� of nioney on this extension. Mrs. �^�ahl.bercr aC}cc.d who was I.�1_ovaing i_t? rir. Jim Lukaszews}ci, 153G Soui�h Ober7_:ir: Ci�-cle, sai.cl it was ploc-led by thc ca�7ipany that plo�•rE.�:� ��lt'. �.SSOC:t_i3��1_C�1"I ZO�(�''S. �"•;flcli= t�1Cy C�O� W<lS t0 TTIa};C? 011C' }�c15S on th� roac� as L-hey c�,.r:;c int.o tlic I�ssocia�l�-�_or� roads, and mu}:e onc pass c�oing ou�. IIe said th�;L ].a.st yeal�, i:h�y h�id jo�nec3 toc3e�cher with �he r1_ac1� I'o_�est. �;��.�rt:ncnt and hacl so.r�c }-�eavy equi��meri-L- brough.t i,�, and tl�is tvas p�iid f.or joizztl.y by the ��lssociati.or� anci thc- BJ_ac}; �.'�OYE,'St". �1Jci.i: i::iE;Tlt. L'i1ulYIil��I1 }�i?I"�t=1S :icilC� 1'�C; 1).ctV�. ci 1Gc3C�1 '1.�1ut C:,JL^.5:i� .�'.. belon.g ta arly.�l���czy. ; T�7� . Rerc;man sa�.d 1:c ha�� occasio?��]_ly c�rivc�7� on this road, and �1� «u5 1.I1 C1C?I1�'Yi:.�_ c.C�l"C'.E�'ITl�'I�L" VTl'G�"1 ��Vi1?'G r)�1:� �C-'_E'Xl Sc1C� c`1�:. t.111S TT1G.G�t11�C�. He sa? d tliat it �•: z=> hi s opiiz�_on that. G•�he-Ltiei �•:e c�.11.cci this a�r�.va���e roaa, ancl �-;1,eLhea: Lhi_s ��J��:; on private praper-ty o.r on pulalic pr_operi_y, ' t � � -t�' � c y--_t_' �aI7C� c�a a t�1�0U_ �1 S't'�.LGE-.'t. it ��a��s i_n fac�� ,acinc� onc_rat�ca �.,.5 a Cit� �-L- �'�c, � I L�-;�as a pz i,�,� co�llc�ctoz :�+�a�eet., i=?�c onl1� way -�to a� � to SiJ_ver Lak� l:c�ad. He s��id he. .reco).lecccd a,u:i�.e clearly th_�t: 3-�- years ac,<o, it � �aas a 1��;7��jzsi�k�i_:i_i_ty of tlzc lla.r_r_c 1 J�. i� a_rr Corpur� �.ian to p�o��ide tlle acce��s ar_-; a to 5i1ve�: Lak� I;o<ia. H� said this m: ar�L- adec�uate �aidth, adc�quate sur�ace <znd acxcqu��t� rnaintenance, an� sa:Ee transpo.rt. r�r. Pet��i�son s�id that thc�_re s:-esns to Ue an agrcement� that the Ci�y �,.ould ncvcr ta)�e over the m�ir_t�nance of pri.va�e roads. He asked ii thn City hacl a speci.a7. arranc�cm�nt �ai�t�h Innsbruck N�r_th that il�ey dor�'t pay th� same ta�es as the r_est of u_s pay. Mr. Stevc Tollisozz, 5538 t�:�c�ist:er_ Ro:�d, �said that the large majority of people �•,lio used thc No}° �.l�s T���,�.rl:�ruc}ti Drive extension were Fridley resicier�t:s. IIe sa�.c� tliat he caugizt a l�us at this corner, and it was a vci:y d��nger_ous pl��ce to have to wall� i�o ca-tCh �.his bus also. Iie said he had ta7_l:ed to the City Assessor and tl;e C_�ty Attorney abouL tales . IIe as]:ed if �Lhere was any dif �c�rence in the tax base because coe maintain our own strects and som� otller things. He said th� anscaer was no, we had t1Ze same tax base as any other area in Fri.dley. Mr. Peterson said h� thoughi� we were on shaky ground on this i•:�x situation, and he would like an opinion from tYie City Ai�torncy on tYiis . Chairman iIarris as):ed Mr. London the specifications on the pri.vate ro�ds. AZr. London said they a11 had at least a 4" base with a 2" mat. T11ere were some that were built �aii:h a deep strength asplialt, aiztic�.patiriy consi�ruction access ta the South. He said this would be We:st I3avarian Pass. IIe said he believed that streei: had a 4 1/2" base �ai_th a 1 1/2" mat. Mr, Hai-ris askc�d�whW���� �}s�trects were breaking u�. Mr. London said thcrc were crac)ca center linc joi.�is and wher� the street joined the driv�ways. He sai.d there were a£ew �lligatorspoi:s, which you can e,xpect in that typ� ot � �'J.anni.t�c� C�;itlRlytssivn Mec�i:a.nc� - !�S_�r.ch 3, ].976 Paue 11 soi 1, espc�ciri.l.ly w11en you have cicc�n sewer and wr�tc�r cuts. I�� said � that gen�r<�:ll.y hc didn't :se�c �:�ny mor_e b.r_e�zl; ups in this arc�a i:han hc� saw on �iny Ca�t.y si�rc�ct in i:hi , typc� of s��i_I. Mr. R. C�. Rumps�, 1.481 Nort�h Inn�briick Drive; r7r.. Dona].d Pct.er:�on, 559 � P9at�ter.horn; ;�1!°. 'I'errv L�Vi].c:�y 557]_ l�;ast Pa�.Jarian Pass N.L. ; a>>d P•2r. . P.en l�urcau, �>�) �0 G�7c� �i= D�.inu�e Ro<i�i, a11 l�,�a commerii.s on the � Nartll Znns��ruc;; Drive e>:l.ensio�z, and th�� }�i.g ��roblem i� was for thi.� �i 3` C ci , , r�ll". I:Llllii�Sci Sc"11C� �".i1CJ"'C ��c1.S )�C'('Il G�1SCU.`�i1011 011 C�_OSlI1C� �1115 roac�� but thc C:i.�:.;T of N����r Lr_ic;ht.��n nc�er::� th��t ��r_cc�:�s foz� iire proLec-i:.�on. ,, tjC �l�_SO JC�.LCi. �.I�tII. IVOI �il� J�117:�•�:.1"L�C» �Y'1.�✓C' ��J�iS u?'�tCc'. Ll'aC�t c�I1Cl lIG tho�:c;ht� t_ric.�.°;� shav:id bc-� n,ore .�i=op si_gns on this str.et�t to slo�•� the � t=r a f L i c cio ;�:- n. � Mr. L�nacnfc�ld s�::id iL s�L�:;r.cc� to him �.hat t.):,e t�c�o�le �_n Inns!�rt�r�� }1�t1-C' u:;)>C3C1 '�_"1C: Cl�.� 'i�:;.i�l' f�l;�::�;; i:0 r1C'� L� t.�"lr„ll �•�, �_i'1 C3 �'i=�-E.'r-E.'11i T�1"C�1;_� CTT2S : cL1l.Ci }1G� ).lc S T!�'.C�F'I' ��'-,�:=,1: c I��� I-C'�1._� �:O �:��E_ ;�'_ COi1C'C'?°il.`� I't SC'C•t:lS �.1}':E i=��C'1� �ar�:.r_r-� totall_y ic;rlcr���.. Iie ti��:�:� a�.}.cd I�.-r. 1�arr i�?Zat if h^ :����s goi:�g to buy a io:enl�oiase, t�.oulc3 �_]�:ere bc ary s�.ipulat:i_o?,s �zs to tlzn rnaini�en«,,c� af roaus, e1=e. C�i�a� :�tind of an ac;.zeerc:et�t ��.OU�_C:t i.�'1:'r'E be? F1E s�.id that: if he� �:Yas r�ol.r�cr t� bu�� � tc�r:nhouse , he �-��ou7_c3 ��a.�t to knc��. tiz�;� it �tias access.-i.b�� in tlic� �,ri_T�tc�r <:��Id sumr:�e� . P•�r. I'a?=r_ sa.id that �he ho�.l,cc;���n�.rs i.11c�i:ZS�lves ��dnl�_I"�;_sLe�� tl��e er.t�_r_c A•�,sociatiOn. ��e said tl� -L' 1�cS0��`]_c. �.10_1 G:�.':"1C'C1 't..i1E' ro:�C15 f �)�C� �^:caS Y.'(==�1�0215]_�lE' �Or' ST10�+7 �ZO"v;i]_=��y i�h� rnaizitezlanc^ of the roads, upl;��e;� oi t���� buii �i.�c�s ar�d th�- n�.ztur�zl urc,:is. I?c s�:�id t�li�y ;�,e�.c� -respon_,i.b�_�� �e� al1 tru� pr�.v� �e ro�.ids in the a.r.ea, vr:il.lZ the e�cc?=�tior. o� idor�h Ir�nr.br.uck l�rive ��hicli �,�as a State l�zd ro�.d� b�ir. I4i.�.};.c� S��?enson said th� t all the hom�e��me:r.-s paid $43 a mont:h to tl�e Assocat.ion foi� u v��rict:y oi ��r_vices, so ii� c�as the res.�.d�:nts o� the ar.�a who lza�-e assuz�j�d the buruen oi maintei�:ance . . Mr. T��r_r �ai.d that it was obvi_ous tha�_ somc�thing was going to have to b� do�:e taith the exteiisi.on o:C Nol'��n IlznsLrucl: Drice until the area in N��a B��ig};ton �aas c�eveloped, an_d T�TOrtli Ii1n �bruck Drive was extenc?cci to Pa1_r�tc.r Raad. IIe sa�d txiat I,�_i.dlcy �aouldn't �-aant to main�ain a raad i.n I�c�,� L�right:on. IIe said. thzt hc wasn`t developing anytlli�zg iri this area, and he couldn't cio it ber�a.us� he didn't have an}T �nioneyp at tl�is point in 1�inic. He sa�.d tlic homeowners in the ar_ea. weren't c�oing to c�o it. T�e sai.cl he di_dn't l:now who was going to dcvelop this road, but he ��aa ��-ai.11ing t.o i�ake or� the burden of u�c�r.ac�inq this road until such ti.me tl���t North l:nncbruck Drive was : completed ��s a State 11id ROad� bui: he couldn't do this uilti_1 he had s�me ftznds �.o do it. �aith. Chairman II<.�rris as}:cd Mr. I'arr i� he had an agr�emc�ni� wii.11 Neca Br.i.gl�i:an tl�at �hey would designate i�his section of- Nor_f:h Innsbruck Drive as a SLate Aid Road. Mr. I'arr sai_d thc,y woulcln' t d� that until there was a c�ev�lopin�,rli� plan for t11e area in New Briqhton, and the street patterns were worked out for that deve.lopmeii�.. Mrs. Wa]ilUexg szid that she had talkcd �, IIrighton Plani�ing Conu�li.ssion anc� as far. ��s I be any plans coming in i'or tliis area unti�l � to someone f rom i�he Neta they knew, thcre wouldn't 1977 or 197£3. i= � Pl.a»ninc� C�mma_s ��.on Meeti.i�g - M��r_ch 3, 1976 � � , � Pac�e ]_ 2. Mrs. ��dal�ilber_g askc-�d Mr, l,ara- i.f h�:� d.icln't own all th� pr.aperty in IVew I3ric�tl�on up to Silver_ ]:.,aicr P.oad at i�lie tin�e i�lli.s ��i°operty w�s rezaned. II� said tl1a� iic. cli.d, }_�LiL- subscc;ue��t�]_y t}ic banl: took ttle p1'o��e�rty. P�I1°s. G�1�ch11ac�r.q saicl L'n�it i.n t�l�c� origin�il agreemeiii� s}�e zem��;tbered th�:zt he w�ts res7�on,�ibl� fo.r rn�i.intainin� tlzi_s road up to Si.lv�r L�:ke Rozd. Mr. Lo;IC�ori said �.hat this pr_o���rty was na��� owned l�y tlic b%irllc. h1rs. G�����hlbei-g �.,l;��c� hoc,� rnucli t.he to���i�ltous� units in t:his p.ro�oscd pl�:Lt ��ou1;:1 �;:�]_1. for? P�1r. P'arr s�zid they �•�oulc3 range in ar�a �-rom 1?CiQ squ��rc: fc�c�t ta ?, i��Q squ�re feet �inc: �,�ould sell in thc ianr;�-� of ;:�;�, C'O0 to �:SU, 0(;0. �l'licy �-�oulcl rat�ge i]�pIfl 2 I:�ecl7-ooins to 5 bedroom:_�, �l'i��y �-�ill be co;�ipz-,1_ible i.n design to i�l1e townhouses in Ph�ise I, II.� �.�Zd IiI. � P�Ir. Vaiz ,�r,;��l �.sk����� if. hc� could request tlie Cit�� rizainc,er to 1 t.u�:F_' (�Oi c i�' _ � f�5 C�i �ii:� i T�i.Z �7 i 1�:'1 ��r� i3 � w'� S 1. �i� �%<�i �"_LciI1 ��1� S� ciii�� T�leis��r �:o�.�u, so that a,-.c�, ai�d Eo�. aJ1, ��:e �vould J:no�a whG'� was tne�e, aii.ci ;:.t__� C_ii_y �.,>ou�_d „r�o�:; �,:�i:1at �;•:as therc. i��r. I;.arr_is ,aid �he Ci-cy , WOU1�l:l�t C10 -CiZ�il. O'.1 ��r'J_�,T�itE' ?:CuC'1:;. Z'}1C'.�' �'JOU1C� �1c+Vi 't.'.O Illa��E,' ��1C-'l� O�r:T] �ES"CS. ' A1Y'� f-.al-ris as:K�c� l�o��, far tl�e aver:�ge unit s�t back frorn th� S�.Y'�'�� i�. 1��1 . LGJ1�Oi? Sc��.c'a ��1C? ri? I.:11llUT:i \J�iS �U � I`�1Y'. I?arris d5�:2Ci IlZ .�Tul'1 ��Y':i("?� lf t.�11:'�� �1�:.C7 c� j7Y"C:i�� f?;•"".1 V:1t.il :3?704J S'L�'r-c'Cj�. j��Y. Vc7.I1 �L�i��.. Sc�..7_� t�1G?"�' Y'G'c"i�_� 1' ;,%r.STi ° i�. c�ii�' p� c�CE` �.G ��U}� L�:.E,' S?70��7� SO 1t. �^Ic3S ZO�C�f.C�. 1T1{�O ' tluc,,:: ar:a l�a_l�u izi cr;� pcnui_r��� a���u. I�,z:. DicJc Pe-L-ersoi:, 55`_,4 �'t7c1�?:�C'!'t�.�;Y'CSS7_?l<J� Sc�111 ���1ci� �3 ZC''.l�fL?" :�E.'t}��.C}e: ���011�_C�ri�t lllcl}iC� c`3.71�7 diffcyrer�ce. "i'!�:��� �4ioulc. st.i.:Ll. h:��v� tl-ie s��n��? problei��. I-ie said tlie � drivc��a�iys �:�et� p<,stt oL tri� st�-cct, ��nd -'tl�icy va�re all plowed ut the samc� tii<<e. �i� . 1-,arriti �.s}:��d :i.-� �he1 haci ber_ms or curk�s on the st�re�ts. I���,. Pe�crson sai_d -chc�l� 1�iad iull_ cu1_bs �:�cept wher_e the ' dr�_v��•��ys c•rcre, i�lr, I�arris «s}�ed �i.i i�l�e st.ree�Ls wer� cro�ti�ned. Nr. Pei���rson said th��r ����.re. ' � ' LJ � ' ' Air. Harris to.ld J�ir. London i�hU� thcre had been some question oi� th� p� rl:i�1� f.'acilitic,s for �.he reci-�atioiz bui_ldin.g. P�er_e -L-IZe present par).i.ng stalls a�zd t:i1e pa�-};ir�q o�z Meister Road done as proposed on tl��e brigi:nal plaiz. r7r. L�n`io�l-�said hc c�idn `t kno�a if it was i�he original plail, but ii� �oas dc�ne accorc�a_nq to an �p�z:�ved plan. He said tie �vould �aan+� to �:alk ta tl�c I3oarc� o� Directo��s of tlic �ssociation befor_c he iu�:l e any recommendat:ioris for ctlanginc� tllc parking in this area. Iie saicz thcre �•,r�re a lot a� Lrecs and a poridiizg �.rea close to this recrc- ation buildi.ng. PZr. Rumpsa said th�t Mr. London has said that every effort would be macle to save as many tre�s as k?ossible . He� said it should be notcc� that. a change i.n c�i-ade Cc"111 l:�c very hard on oa.1: trees, and witlt i:h� problcm of oalc wi.lt, all th� 11�1�t�ly trees should be saved. i-ie said that lic had uscc} tilirig around his trees i.o save them, and he thouc�ht morc� ca��e slZOUld be taken to save thc trees. Mr. IIarris said the Cii:y Natur.�ilist ��Tould be worl:incJ �aii�h the Darrel Farr Co�:noratian on this dc�vel.opmenL, and it was hoped tli��t this would save more af the trees. �.- Planninc� Co�mnissioi� P•7ceting - T9arch 3, 197G _, Pac�e 1.3 C� 1 � 110TIOPJ by F�J��h1b�r�, second�.cl by P�tcr:son, tl��zt: tlle Pub1� c llear..i.��J be closed vri thc co1�:.zdr�rativrl of a prC.I..1111117�2.L'L) p1at, P.S. If%6-O.b, by Dar.r.cr1 Jl. I�ar.r Dcve.]opmcnL Car��or.at._zon, iJj�vn a vo.zcc votc, al..I votiny aye, Chairmun ll�zrr%s decl�tr.cd the Pub1_.ic llearing closed ai: 9:40 P.1�1. Mr. t3erc�rn<zn saicl 1���� h�d 1_ist.ecl some concer.ns thai� have been ' mentionc��d }:•1� i�l:c.� �;���o;_:�? �� �f No� t11 Tnnst�r_ur.;:, �_:zzd b�� i�hc: member_ s_of t�he ).��c-111111I";C� (�Uiilill:.�;�'1017. LOTlC('7"Il.`i C�]_Y'('.C�.E'C� 11C?c1V11�7 i-O�^:i�l"C�S t�"1C 1�c71I"G'�.. Farr Corpot-<��Lian, sc�;�te c�uc�;tions directc�. �o thc Cit:y, arid he felt , � CI� thc�se co»ce; :zs n�c�d_�a considcr�t.ior� bef_ore they cou]_c� gi.ve any sort of �:pproval oF �lie p:i.<lt.. i-Ie saic; he wou.l.cz 1il;c �o hc�ar somc commc�nts f_rom �he aL-11��r rn�mu��r:_ o�- thn Planning Con;r��i_ �sion b�f.ore he lisLeci �}1GSC' CUIICE'ti�7,:; . ' P��r. L�rr,c�riic�ld s��icl he thouqht th� ;a:-ing of as Iilany trees as po:�� i.ble �a�oulc: b� a r_c;z?ccrn. Ilc: said t?.at it stat.es in t}ie administ��a- :�.�ve ret�ort: i).�aL quit� �z ie��: trc�es would li�ve to bc rc�:lov�d. P,9r. lsoa�dmar� s�3ic1 t�i:zt ir� p��viot�s c�evcloprn�n�.s l�y Darre]_ Farr tl��y had ��aT�cd �s ma;�y t��e�s as thc�S� coul.d, and ��rith tnc help ot Dai� � �lu�.:C, the riatu�"alisi�, he �aas sure thai� they would save as many trees as p�ssii_�1:�. TZr. Peterson sai.�� he was ccnce.rnec� ubeut t��ees, but �ahen we were di.sctzssi�.zg the pr_esc�t:vai�iori of Lre"s on pritrate pr_operty he thot�c�ht �.s is w�s k�_nd a:� snalcy gro��na � He tnouc�l�t the City sh�ulc� mo�e legitima����J_y b� conc�rncd �vith th� s,.ree�s a�zd t:h� tr�: fic flow ii� �his area. H� sai_d tl;at ds tl�e Cl��.`�L,n��n of thc P�rks & P-.ecre�ztion Co;��miss�on, his coi�cern and i�h�.t �,as �•:hen �•�e had tl:� p�cple frcrn Ir_nsbr_ucli �To,'th appeai•ing befor_� :�.i.� Commissiar abc�ut tenni�s catzrts that should be pu� in, he ��:ou1c� like to see the time, th� place, and the fundinq for these ter�?1is cotires, instead of jusi=. u sti�ula�.ion tlzat at some fui_ure -L-izne they t•aould b� built. D1r. Langenfelcz sai.d that he felt the eztension road of North Innsbruck D�-i.ve was a major. head�che, and h� said he �aoul.d like ta see som� solutio.l foi�i�d for this acr.ess before sorneone was killed. He said tl�at any s�lbsequent developmeni� in this area �r�ould only compound t.he probl.em. TZrs . ti9ahlUerg said she thought tliey sl�iould bear in mind that the original_ proposzl �or �his part of lnnsbruck had a much larger amount of uni.ts, and th::zt th�y had prelii�linary approval for that many units at that time. l�robably the k�y to this now was the road sii�uation. Tra�fic patterns whicli havc developed in thc: first three phases o� the toe,nlzouse developmeni� had made Iler have grave reservations about tlle traffic probl.�ms witlz the development of two more townllot�se arc�as tliat w�rc being considered at this time. She thoughi: thaL- ever� i� these were private roads, the City had the responsibility of stepping in on a main funnel street. Chaiz:man IIarris ask�d Mr. E3oardman llow this fii into i:hc Comprc- hensive Plan? Mr. I3oardman s��id it fi.i� i.n ver_y well. Mr.. Harris asked about the u�ila.ties? Mr. 13oardman said they all have to meet i:he Cit;y specitications. Mr. IIarris asked who guaranteed the work. Mr. Lonclon said they hzd thc standard contract with the com�any that �1. ' Planr�i.n� Cc�m;niss.iocl Mecti.nq - Ma:ich 3, 7.�)76 P1c�c 1_�!• did 'the wor.}:, 1 year. IIe saicl t11� contractor used tl�e City speciii- caL-ir;ns for water ��nd storm sc�aer.s and thc sanitar_y scwer. MUTION by 13c,z•ym�1n, sec:onrled l�y Pc�t�'rsorl, Lh�lt thc P1a��n.ir�g i' Comm.i�sion coritinue� i�nt:i1 1�1..irch .27, 1�7G, the considr.r��t.i.on of. a prel ir;�.i.r�a1•y ��.I:it.-, 1',S. ,'17G--01., Tnnsl�rurfi IJ�.rtJl 1'orr�l�hocise 1"V and V I11dd.i C zon, by D�irrc�l �1. F��r.r Dev�lo�m<�nt Co.r. f�or�it.ion, being a replat ' of Uut.lot 11, I"»lislj2'UG'i: 1�r01'�)1 l�dcl.it.ior�, gcn��l'�I.J.y 1oc�rt<�d SouL-h of l.'nnsl,.ruck TJorth 2'o;;nho�l�c�,, Ph��se I, IT, ar�d 1�II, uni_i]. the fvllowing e.on�cz•��s h�.ve Lec�n �c1c]r_c�sse�1: The Darr��1. I�'ar.r D�:Y�eloprr��ni Cor��nraticri app1� ��ti,eni�ion to c�ue�t.:ol�s a.�l,ed �t th.i..�; r;;:��i:i.ny, such as; 1. 7_. 3. 4. 5. G. .Strect�s do noi= m`et t1�e Cii:y spccificrations. _ Claz�.ii-.icat.ion of str.��t �it�il�tenanr.e, il� paz�t%cu.l��r on t1�e Nvrt.i� .Z1lnsbr.uck U1_�i�c= extensioi� io S.i.Zver L��1�� I:vad. ; C1ct:�ific�i�ion oi- t.�.ir�e per_iod involved in tc�nn�s courts & Lot 1oi.s Need of assurz.r.cc bt) rhe Assoc_iat_ion t��at st�r.cets usccl during const-ruct-ion t,-iJ__7. be r.epair.ed and rnainta.ined. Re-evaluate thc ��dec�iiacy of. pa.rJ:ing facil.it.zcs for thc recreation_ cente�•. � Revier�r if �here 4ras a need to on1c� r�11c?�r off street parkiriy. Tlie Cit� Admin_istz�atiori shau,.d: 1. ?. Clari� y tlie Cit�� street °pecifications and compare t1�em to the spccificai_i.ons i�� Inr�sl�rucl�. 1�rovidc� a 1e?al op_inion on the street ma.ir�ten�zl��e versus equal t�:ixatiorl que��tion. 3. Cornmtln.ic,�t� �oith L-he Cit� of ATCw I�rightol� .zn regard to access to Silver Lake Road as far as improvem�nt ��nd the State Ilid d�si�nai.�.on s.iivation, and their p1�2ns on canstr.uction of an altern�zte rouie. P�9r. fiarris said a concern he had was if the acccss to Silver Lake Raad �aas cut of�, G•�hai� would be the altcinate �raffic pattern for th�.s area. i�e thought thc City �ngineering si�aff should address this proulem immediatel.y. Mr. London said that during thcir work with New Bri.ghton, they had a consultani� do a i�raffic study, and l�e thouglzt i�he City of New Brighton had a traffic study done also. fIe said that at i�hat tiane tlz�y were considering altcrnate access• to Sil.ver Lake Roac�; " k'hetl��eL it bc� 14, Nori�h Innsbr.ucl: Drive or. Palmer Drive, it was determined ak that t11liC that Palmer. Drive w�zs tlYe bcst inters�ction.' It was also d�teiminGd that t�here would be more i:han enough capacii�y to handle all of the trafiic irom t.his area. 11t �hat time we were � � ,. � ' � � � ' , � �. ' ' ' ' � ' � ' � Planni.ng Cor��m�_s�io11 Meeting - March 3, _ 197G P�ge l5 __ planni_ng �50 UI�1L'� in t�hc R-3 roned proper�y, and now t�iis proposal was ao�en bc�loc� G�0 uni.ts. [a� wc�.c� also I?.r_opc�sing ��L �Lhat time, to have ov�r 3SC1 units bet.�•�een I'r..ia).��� ancl Silvcr l.,al;e Road, c�Jhieh also �aou]_cl liave }�cen ft�n���lca to i:hi.s irii�et_secti_on. Iic sai.d i�hat� wh�n i.hc P��_lmer 1�:�-i_ve int_ersection caas compl.��ted, �hr tra£iic pal-.terns wi11 work iot: this area. Chai..ri;��in Iiaz_�ris asl;ed ��Jh�.� ��ye �aere goi�zg t.o do in the meantime? He said thai; mic�ht not happen for 5 yeurs in Ne��r ��rightan. Iie sai3 n-C' rlO1JC'_C� ��1�3t. �1r, r'i�Z]" �'iOUZC� 1:>E' SLI(.'-CC'f'.�S�=U_�. �•I1i.�7 t�"l:`_St' t1NU �O�ti1111OU.�(_' development:�, but wii:l:�c,ut a gvod ��cccss t� Sil.v�r La;cG Ro�d, h��� -l.hougl,� ii� �.���u)_d i�e onc bi.g problein. P�Ir. Lan�;erifel.�� s�id tl-�is acccess vias impor_tant from the wafety si�anclpoin� t�oo and �or_ acc.e�ss Lor_ rir_e protcction and other ernergnric��1 vehicles. Mrs. ���ahlberq said that when. the Ci�ty �aas ctieckinq on tY�.e „ c?C:C:.'SS1}�1� lt.jj iO.t" �i1=�_., �1:L'e? p:'-11'l�1pS �)�^ �:1'Cy COUI.C:I 2_QC;Y_'l?SS li:SP_).:E U1:G IilU]'�C' t.lii2-C' t0 t:i�C SL�:'EC� j�1�0IJ�_:�'iil OII. T�U'.�tr: I��n.`��'1;1'�iC�C n?"1VC' f �iiCl S�2 1r c�il�� uC�Q�_li;:i_UI-:i.il ��Oi-� S"1Qii.`.> G`iOl1J_(1 i1F�in JOJ_T�T-C' Lil:^ p�roblLIii< S�7i� said �hat trav�l.;_i�g tAYI�J�� O11 i7ox�i;�� Znncb.rt�cl; Lr_ �_ve ttlUt triere s:�lvulu. be a warri�_nq sign a.s you corn� azound thc: curve to �he cxis i�inc s�ccp S1C�T'i� Llic?.� ��;�'-�"C' �'JciS cl S"iy0�� Slc�r cli]c',�1C,'1. ���-CJ' Sc�IC? S�"lc�. ��uLi SEell a lo�: a.f- pecple zip -tlirouc;h �his st:o�� sig.� Uecausc tlzey didn'�� k�zo:a it wG.s thE�re, par t?_c�� larly on tl,� ice � Up�iz a voice vote, a11 vot�ii�g a��e, the motion carried unatlimausly. MOTTON by Pet.erson, seconded bi) ve.ry;nan, thaL t1�e P1.ani;inq Co�rml.ssion contir.ue u��ti_Z l�iarcii 17, ]976, t:he co�isiderat_ion of a toranhouse developm�ni ot 100 t�nits, 7'-rf7C-�01, bc� D<�rzel A. Farr Developr�i�nt Corporat ? oil, for Innsl�rucl> Noi'tll Townl�ousc�s IV and V �'�dditio�is. Upon a voir,e votc, a11 votiny a��e,, the motion carried urianimousl y . � ' 5. PiJ}3LIC iiE��RTNG:__CO�STDFI:['1TTON OI? � PRi�LIr-11N?�PY PL�T, P.S. �76-02, II�N�BI�UCi� VI_LL�IIC�L':, 1�Y D��R1Z�_:L A. I'ARIt DT:\%:i LOPi�11�i�T CORPOP.11'T'1`OIJ: 13cing a rcpl�:�t o1_ OuE�tot��3, Innsbrucic North Additioi�, along with Lot 4� 9, e�ccpt tl�ie �Ve�t=erly 210' , Audit.or' s Subdivision iv'o. 92 , gen�rally locatecl Nortl�,ioi NQrth Inn.sk�ruc}c Driv� N.�. and 6�'est of the 131ac}c rorest I�par�tment. CnNSTT)I.P-,11'i70N OP 11 `I'0����?IIOt7Sl; l�rV]:T_�OP��11,N'Z' OF 100 UNITS, T-ir76-02, BY DI�RI:I�L 11. F11RR DLVl,I,01?i�]EN`1' COI:POR71'.��ON, I'OR INNSI3KUCIC VILLT�C;L. l�r. Darrel I'arr, Mr_. Jim Lonc�on, and Mr. John IClicJc, architect for the townhause devclopment in �nnsuruck Viilage were pres�nt. I�fOTION by Peterson, sccondcd by\Faalil.berg, that the P1anr�i�ig Commission oper� thc Public Ilearing on the consider��tion of a preliminar� plat, P.S•. 1�76-02, Innsbrvck Village\ by U��rr.e1 A. Far.r. Devc�lopmcnt • Cor.porakion. Upon a voicc� voL�, a11 ��otinq aye, Cl�air.man !larris declared the Public Ilearing O�JG'll at 10:�02 P.M. � � i OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO WHOM IT �+'!AY CONCERN : � � '� Notice is hereby given �hat �khere will be a Public �iearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall a�. 6431 University Avenue.Northeast on Monday, April ].2, z976 in � iche Council Chamber at 7 o3Q �'.M. for the purpose of.: Consideration of a�inal Plat, P�S. ��76-U2, Innsbruck Village Addition, by Dar�el A. Farr Development Corporatiora, being a replat of Outlot Bo IYinsbruck North Addition� along with Lot 49, except the Westerly 210 feet, Auditor's Subdi.vision Noe 92, all lying in Section 24, T-30, R-24; City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota� � Generally located North of North Innsbruck Drive NoEe and West of the �lack Forest �„ Apartmente Anyane desa.ring to be hearcl with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. � Publish: March 24, 1976 March 31, 1976 I � � WTLLIAM J�. NEE NlAYOR �_ � � � r � �: �./�.J � .�:.`: ^ . :`` . �, o w . � • � $ i .. `... __....._........__._.__._.r., '•,� � . � i. . , � � �� i,�»� -.._ ; ' �,9>.nj `• ' ' L� A � , • �� 4C7 ; �1 + '�;.:- ; , . : ��r3� . , .•.�,..,: . �:� ; ; � ��.�• .� i ,' ;�. : , , i�,;.y � ��. � .• � �. ` .`, � � � . � • '. � t � \ l �� -'/L --- � _.'r.---.._.._..i,. � �------�---------� - � �:, c� �.• , ' , . � , , ', �` , , � w� • � . . `� ".-._� . ,. . ... . . �: . . , � ._ . , � .. . , • �� ��22).Ol � � `, , �.. __ _.._ � ".�"- ---"'--' ' . '' �/yn� , � .�. " • � . . • � � ', t � � `� �. � . y _ �� ,' 4" � ' .., � � ' • .0 w� z �-� ' -� � �. , � : - . , i� , J, �: , � . , ` . � . � ' -- � , �.� -;re .::.�c ..:� . T:_ r•'o' ° r ` � � 5��3' � � • � �, - .._ �`" + i Ct �`T � i o 1,�, � � � ; 1 . •W � � . l 1• ♦ •�v � .'! j:. � � _ . ' . , . . ' �' .: .✓ �. .. . ., . ' _ i'� 1 1 ( , ,�r ,• � l ''�/• •`,l' !• ' ��y `, (`+.: t �i� � ' �: �� T �.;� i::,' . _"�� ` Ci7 ; ` : c ,, ,; ; � ;� �' ' ,� ,; T ' <<, � . <s, ., :: ; , 2 ` �' 1 _ �L p 'Y:`,` ...•, t, _ �.ai . �� �r.:` .:r • \ �._• L (�� � ��� ; � .�.° !i ' n ' �.•T: . '�. ij�' , �� y. � ; 3 .a •��`;��. - �: ; �� ��. ' � f�f,1'. . ; � t., �. � 1;,� ' r � �. � `�• ��' � �' � ��'�� `�.�v.: •11 :��R, ' ' h � '�'�, i � /-a..,'M �`.+ '�^ � /N ` f t��,�',� �� �.\' 4`i '..�J!I�� Jjt� . f�.w n �'/ � }'(+�,� ^� � \� 1 \ � � . i._> , i� r t;'e�'� � �' .� .� ^r `' S ., r � `' ., ). ' /� • ..�..ti � • .fJ h N% l�.` ��J'f �T•• � `•'', 4' `�'~A� ` '� . � `C;� .�' ���? � _�� ��•• �.. - � �� . � ,•,..... . , � � �• � /d ., ' . f�� •.i t, � ,�, � s � � l"� ,,ti _ .�.,, t � � �`_ 'i' :iyi- � Z' .!' r °�. - , :'� � •i i ' � � � r'�'� � � �t � � �'r� �.'•9'. \\ / � . .. J'; t � � L , ,: :`�' .z- _ � " � '+ ; ,` a , . ; ,� � •` ♦ i ' '��' • � � ` ` � L — ; � J �„ � • 1 � t � � � � 1 � 1 �` ` ` . 1. y `�� , � � � � _ I � ` 1� \ \ \ � � � ♦ \ � � �� � � ' r ��,1�0 � ' %� 1 � _ � � --�--------..._-- ---. -.... . .. �, _ , . . � . ; .. , - - �. '. �z,r�o) � .�l . .,� , 1 � � 1 • � ,\ - � � � I � y • I 4 \ � � ......-�_...,_-. ..._.-......�...�....�,..n.. ,.. . ... .�o...a . O U�iOr '' L � �� � t _ d. �+'•1.. f� :.,� ... ,l �� � _. �, , ' �� ;,. .- - , ;._.*� , `�r�,��l� • �. ,�.� !' .. :.:• . - ,��� ..:n....`�,�'�I:�`"1t`14l/d�i t: 1.:::� �"_!�^�'-_ �v;� .. � . • i • . . � (' t � � . 1 1� �.•.� � � • ( { J 1 J t. .. { _ � __...-.---�-'S�._. : f.. ;�U ,t,,•.�. �.7 3 . . 'r,"s , • ,� ' i.i,.• .. �i 1�, �� . ....,�_�..�-�- :.:-• r � 4. �• : . . �--`-"'�._..-,. , •.,`. ` t.• ' � M � . _ ..-. �---, �'"' � ^" • :. ' 1 i�,. G�' " rr;' �� +y.� �h •��.•,\ •�I .. , "' � � - '� ' . � ,l, `ti� : � � .. , ✓f F• •/'•, � :�� � '....t. .. ..1'� � � ���J�•,�' ' r � �. ''. j �� ` . � � .. ��• / . p � � f �' `L<'. fj C w .% t '`.`• .? � � '` `' , �. 'i ,, ' �.' w •I= '� �• 1 ,i '-I �' / ` �l• �� u � t ! � % I f `' �' v . ,! ,, �y / . •`.� , •'� � .�� ti" . ' !� �� � 1 I l• i i., i � t` 1 , ` �.._ �� a C� �``'=� Y�� �� .J4 � ,� � , r�7 � �/` �����,, _ Ii f l �,.�� �I'I �' '�� , C ' .; '6 v � �: i � .. .�. .., y �� i ► •' � ,j) Ei1' �, / r �Ir.�.'�'/` i �;� �'���U � yy� ��� a,� ��` ��� •i•, � �i �.. � 1 't _ 'I. �� • ). .�., I�� � '.'.' .i � " : � �, ..' R. i. � .r J �l ' � �, � � � �� ; �f � '� � t v � I • , � �.� , ..r , , '�i .. ? a �, � � . . . t ! � f, `� �.. ' � ''! � � � .I�� '; ' / +.1:,. ,.� , � � � '.., 'i �' �" �1 � • /' 1 �t .. � �''';' ,M • ' ~•,,�, . •. LfS'� ... r '"' _' ' , _:.1 ' ' .� �.' t �• . � 1� / . _: °�'- . ,�' ` - t^ `[. ,.�a .�� .. .,, �, � . � / �, . f; l./ ��� ,•�.ri�•- e t ' /� �• + �`.,-.. . � R•• t r, �� � .�./' . x �'L. . � J�� Y jl'• ��J `� �'�l 1 • '' I J CITY OF FRIDLEY PETITIVN COVER SHEET Petit ion N��. 6-1976 _...�� 4B � Date Received April 7, 197b Peti ti on't.��,e'�ri eaT y Ci ty Gounci to con i ti on acceptance/approva'� of proposed Preliminary Plat, P.S. #76-02,.Innsbruck Village Addition, by object Darrel A. Farr Development Corporation, being a re lat of Out Lot B, Innsbruck PJorth Addition, along with Lot 49, excPpt the Westerly 210 fee�, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, all lying in Section 24, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, P�innesota ... including the request to waive the City Setback Ordinance from 35 to 0 feet. Petition Checked By Percent Signing Referred to City Council Disposftion Date � � . March 31� 1976 �� � � i � i � �� T0: Fridley City Council C/0 Mayor, City of Fridley 4C Reference: ^Consideration by the City of Fridley of the propos�d Preliminary P1at, P•S• Number 76-02� Innsbruck Village - Addition, by Darrel A• Farr Development Corporation, being a replat of Out Lo t B• Innsbruck North Addition, along with Lot; 49, except the Westerly 210 feet, Auditor's Subdivision Number 92, all lying in Seetion 24 � T--30 � R-24 City of Fridley, County of Anoka, flinnesota ••• including the request to waiv-e the City Setback Ordinance from 35 to 0 feet • ^ We the undersigned, hereby petition the Fridley City Counci]. to condition acceptance/approval of the �above captioned project upon com�liance by the developer {Derrel A• Farr Development Corporation} with �he following restrictions: I. ^That the City of Fridley in consideration of its tax paying resi- dents, establish standards of year-round maintenance for the North Innsbruck Drive Extension {that section of black top road beginning at the Blac4� Forest Apartments, and running East L-o Silver L�ke Road}, and tha� said developer {Uarrel A• Farr Development Corporation} shall file a suitable performance bond with tfie City of Fridley� which shall be renewed annually� and shall be adequate to properly maintain said road through completion of constr.uction activities in the Innsbruck North Adait:i.on•^ TI• ^That the City of Fridley disallow waiving the City Setbac� Ordinance � in the a6ove re�ierenced area on the grounds that it would be dis- t ' that it would create an unsafe condition due to a minimum r � � � , � � crim�.na ory� of two blind spots on the proposed City M�intained Road connecting North Innsbruck Drive to Auther Street; that due to the narrowness of this City flaintained Road, and in view of assumed parallel parking on both sides of this road, it will prove to be a ma�or hind�rance to Fire and/or Police emergency vehicles access7 and as a result of garage/dwelling structures close approximation to the road i�self� prove to seriously inhibit adequate snow plowing of road surfaces, short of truck removal from the immediate ar•�a, at City expense•^ ITI• ^That the City of Fridley obtain from the Darrel !#• Farr Developmenfi. Corporation an official and accep�able understanding as to Quad- Townhouse home owners financiaZ responsibilities for maintaining all � non-City Maintained Roads in the above referenced area, as w�ll as the upkeep of townhouse exteriors and common grounds•" Sincerely� Concerned Area Residents, Innsbr�uck North Addition Attachment � � March 31, 1976 ' Subject: Innsbruck North R�sidents Petition Page of y D Reference: Darrel A• Farr Development Corporation � � � NAME ADDRESS � � � ,,,. � !/-:' � ( t ;,: i,r.:l= J � .c ��f�. ;-j�,�,. � ! �: �� / ,1 �� �i ^ � � / � � � � � �'--1.,.�„�.eU.i � ; _.. �. L_ �..,,. �s---c�„� . / ' � �� � � �/ l''� . �(, ,,i ;�_ �% .:� // � _ � /) �� _ �"`____.__ . �� � . � � ,, � � -�,,��:; ;'� c: `'l _.� � "� � �-, �. � � c_.; �` � � ' �// ' 'A �� / /?/ ( . ` ( / ,.' i � � � . �n / %1 A � ��)1 r•i 0 f+-, � t ,-� �Ll; , �� ,�� ���: �� � ,� .� l �.�. �,� L� � . J -- / � % C �' �, ' /� . ' . ---; , x_, �_L. �,-c__�.�� .l! >� =�.'. / �� // ��r7.� �'� % �� �/?.�L �%' �i-- ,/� /� / _ — (1 i` � - ✓ i\ J���f �' � .. � � ,��: l_'%-r_._. ��; � r� , �t`��'d, � � `�,.,� "� , � / '! l / V � _�=1,� �- c �� c� 1 \ � �' � i � ,� ..�, - << �. � � r � (� � �? e!f �«�"/� /' `� � „ ri� / `// � �� • �;�,�-�� �<<� _ `'%j � J ��c ' C� (.' ����� r '' � i iC�//���',G �,• �,�, (�� �` /,�f�'�- /'j�. .�-�✓.4/.;> �,cl.: � '� /• �?" ' 'Z . c� -c� . ` �'T 3 % /�', �.�r6� � .��t. . o�u�(Yr �� �7J / %�' � . I .� , _ � j � March 31� 1976 ' NAM� . .. . , 9' , /f �'� �" 1' . � �� J / / �Zl.l.l".�. -'� �-2 �/ . 1 k/ � - � r-ti � �—.t--i t�' Zf � �l"L�.-t-7c^ `�1 , � ,� . ; � ,�1<.�.t2,-1:-� ,r'y � (.� /1 �-�3-�. � �� � ..�....5 � 'ti� ,�l�L.L�L� � . .L v�c �'�-' ,� ; ; �' ����°',�___ � . . . _- � page of 4E ADDRESS .___�_ ��_ 'S�� D � //�,����/N �� �71 � , , � ,�1 � J �� �� ,�.,�.��� l.-� -�}� � � _5 l� L /i,� rC t, s�, �s j rr �.-tt-�� �I;��v,� �,.s:L� - y - �.��r � _ i: .sL � 0 . � ,,��%�-�� ` . . �:� � ��/, � ► �. � ��. . . . � � / � �':,,�,� r �, � � / f � ' / � ��f�i .r_ 1, � ► ���_ ► � - � � ` t , � � ,r .: � , � �, j i / !� (f � March 31, 1976 ' NAftE r/. �'ll . �,x .��-�-' ; ,.��i �i , r G (,� � '"7 , , " 7 �% j �, ..�r�Z'�.r1 �-1--2._r�i'L._i-r.�-� � _. -_ �� / � �' � ) �Zu%T; i�if � -�.�� / ._. x i ���ti,�� �� �a- � �� � . ��� �� ��- �,: �` �► ��� ��,�� ;i1.�1,,� ���� �� ■ J r � . � � .�___._ � � . � page of ____. � 4F � ADDRESS �SS'°� I`�. c�(',ERcrv� c�R��� �"� ' -� i�.,� _� ,.� r �i�-� �� i r-c �a � ��Z � 1�� /� !�%�L , (� �-,,�_ �""-� %1,c:-��__�- � � %� � . _ SS- 5 G' �. %��� � � L �r? ��.,,,,� i. �� I j SC� / I,�u� C./.t.�-%'' r�-h ��G:1-�-�(' _ � � (� �'�.� 1 � �i- �, }� e . �� � e� � --., ti1 �. � � �/_� �� ��� , a r � 't � March 31� 1976 ' � NAME . �'� 1;,};�„S�, �`. � � c��� �� � `J���. � _.'�/�.�`-,('!` , ; kli'�f. .�.�� -�;� � ,c. ,�� , ' — - --�� . �;'���' CZ � � �' �' - j,��?�� ���_� 1 ��� � �, J ��- -���F 1.-�� ,�.�. � � ' , � � � �_ � �'R'*�'-^�'..' Page � of 4�G. ADDRESS � �h�"�C'� �'1 c�� ; .� c� � c� 1� � � ; < . , .� , ,� � �. �J l� ,� �! ��. �.� �' 1 j ,, �' '�.�"� `�! �.� \ � — �.- �"� �� �% lC�`�2/,�.�t�,.� .- � J, ��"?� � � i C-i �L�i�l � / .'` i ;' ,L i�,�L�, � ./?,,.,?/�-{� �S S I c� ���I c�.,�� �,.v,---- � .� _ .. � _ ��'/� '_� - / 4�-0 �;� .�����-�-c�c c %�_ c�i� .> �) , , /t.c:� � /l�ci �4�-J���,:.c-�� /�</ . r.. � .i � �l ' ' ,,; � ' March 31� 1976 NAME `,1� r- r . , ',� , • , , r �� � � i I ' � � �c"�;=c1 � � � G �GL-� 1 � � ■ 1 ,, 1 , ■ . i � , : ■ ADDRESS �� �J_``� �.` __� (1.i..� page y_ of 4 F( � �� ��. � <-.. , . n " 1. .� t/ � .�.5� y � �%�,.vv/�� /�l�. ����LL- y �`���`� �� ��� n u �. �✓. - - - � March 31, 1976 page ' � ? NAME ADDRESS _ � .r j I/ / �/ � � / y�Z-- �/ t) �..�_.�✓ //S.1/i''!c" ' ' � � i � ■ 1 1 t . � � _ � of - 4I ,�„�-- /-�.,;�-/ /2� _ IMarch 31, 1976 _ -�,,. � �,.. .._�_� . , , _� ! � . --,�._.-- _ _ � __ 1� 1 ! t -�-- � Page of _ �+ J .,,_ . , . �..r�.� .� . ` P1.ann5.nc� Conunission Meeting - March 17, 197G Page 23 was b�ing proposed in this plat, and would what was in th�_ , same tOW11110USC �l$SOC1c�i:lOI1 be considercd as one Planned Unit Devcl�pment. � � ' Mr. Boardman said tl�iat the Planned Unit� L�evelopm�nt was all oi� Inrisbrucic i�hat D7r. Farr developed. The preliminary planncd development i:hat was approved by the City included the single family area, the townhouse areµ, and the apartment area. This has been c�nstructed in ph��s�s, but it was all one planned development. 1ie said he didn't thinJ: you could judge this by just one plrt of th�.s develol?mcnt. u ic 110TTOld by Pete:�rson, secondcd Ly Ber.gman, that the Planning Commiss_ion reco»�n�e��ci to Cout�cil ap�?roval of a townhouse developr.�ent of 200 units, T-i�7G-01, by Darrel �1. •1'arr Develapmen� Corporation, for I���nsbr_tick 1�'orth To��nhouse IV ar�d V Additions. , - 2�5�°. IIerman saicl thai: he felt that in the ccnte�>t of the total plan, thai� ther.e was a very broad price range in this develo�ment. � � � �J �� r � � �. � ' AZr. Scott said i�haL- �Thei� h� _loo}ced at the t:otal development he sa�a poc�:cts of this group 7.ivi_nq hc�re, and another grot�p livi;-zg i�herc, each gr.c;up being of a cert.ai_i� i_r.com� range. He said that in his opinion thi� �aas stcr_eoi�yp�d planning, and he could see this d�.velo;�ing th� sa:�1c, as or�, gr:ot�p oi: orie side of the tracJts and anot�her grou� on the o-clzer si.cze of the tr�.cks. He said he would li.�e ia �c.c a broader ranc�c� of housine� .for a Iarger range of inco�ae grotlt�:.. r4r. I'arr said th�,.�: this devel op;�,�r:t covered 60 acr��s, and 1:,� thought t).ZGt in '..�zase 60 acres Lhis dc�velop:lent did meeL -tha� cr:i_-i er:i�, and th:i : �3.s a�ully i.nteg?�at.cd communit_y. He said th�.t-. in the saine articl�: ;:e had read fro�r hef_o_°c, it cites Tnnsbruc�?: T��o:rtn as a ful.l.y intcgrated cleve]_opmen'c aa to styles oL- housiz�c;, anc� p.rice a:anc;c. Mr_s. Spor-r� said sh� felt tti�_s �•�l�ole de�T�lopmcnt offered a variety ot ti:fe si�yJ_es. She said that peop.le vaho bougl�t lIltO a to�4�zlhoL�s� de�Telopment �aer� Luying into an exc.lusion at_�a, and did so because they �aan�Lcd to be in a priva-�e ar.ca.. Sl7c� i�haugl�t this fit into i�he housinc� p1an, ber.au�e it did meet thc� needs of peop.le. wlio t•;�:,nt.ed a diiferc�nt lize si�yle, and Fri.cilc,y should be protzd thai i�hey can ofL-er such a devclopmea�t. UPON a voice votc, Ber. q�iian, Harris ancl Petcrson votin_q aye, Gabe1 abstainir�g, ai�d ScotL- �Tot�ing nay, t1�e mo.t�iot� carried. 4. CONTINLILD: :''i3Z;I�.t ITl,�1RING: CONSID�I�I�TION OF A PI:�I,Ir11NARY �s. __..�—� - — : , PL71`I', P.S. �;r76-02,)�CNiJSL�RUCI< VTLL11G1., BY�DIIRRLL 11. �FI\RR DEVLLOPi•,1:NT �C2��F`v1TlON: Beirig a replat o� Oui�lot B. , Inn�bruck North Addi�Li.on, along �aith Lot 49, e:�cept thc jti'csterly 210' of Auditor's Subdivi.sion No. 92, generally located Nortli of North Ii�nsUruck Drive and Tti'esi� ot the }3lack I'orest Apartment. Public I3earing closed. � } , � r- i ' � � ' , ' , , ' LJ ' � � � � �L Planning Commission Meeting - March 17, 1976_ Page 24 5. . CONTINUT;D: CONSID�RATION OF I� TOWNIIOUSr DI,V�LOPMENT OF 1�0 UN1TS, T-�76-02, I3Y DAI2RLL 71. 1'11RR DL;VELOPMLNT COIZPORA`1'IOI�, FOR :INNSBRUCK VILLIIGT. MOTIUN by Peterson, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission reopen the Pub.iic Hearing on the consideration of a preliminar� P1at, P.S. i176-02, Innsbruefi Village, by Darrel A. Farx Development Corporation. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman Narris declared the Public Nearing open at 11:45 P.M. Mr. IIoardman said it �aas proposed to construct 25 4 unit tovmhouses on this plat. He said th� preliminary approval for this phase of th� Innsbruc)c developrnent was for a 251 unit apartment coinplex to be cons.truct�d in,this area, so instead of having ?.51 units in this area, there wi11 be 100 units. There are HUn monies involved in the development so West Bavarian Road v,�ill be a p��blic street �aith a 50' right of wa.y �ahich will be a connect�ing s�t.reet between Arthur Street and North Irnsbruck Drive. The spur roads in the development vaill be private streets, and this will have a separute Townhouse I�ssociation. Chairman Harris said tliis �aas the plat where there �,�ere structures too close to the the s-L-reet, and �ahere they had requested a blanket variance. Mr_. Boardm�n sai.d the City Attorney has said that any variances needed c,�ere subject to approval �-aith the ap�roval of the to�enllouse deve)_op:T?ent, and whe�.her the Planninq Commissian agrces �aitll his ini�erpret.atian that this didn't h�ve to be heard by the Appeals Commission v,Tas up to �Lhem. He said that :�nowhere in: the i:.o�anhouse ordinance does it mention setback requirem�nts. I�ir. Iiarris said this p.ro�er�.y was zoned R-3, and he felt they had to i,leet the P-3 requi.remc�nts o�� a public street. D'Ir. Boardrnan said that und�r the tovan7iouse ordin�nce requirements, that t�his vaas the only time in ot�.r o��dinances that there had to be, both a p.lat approval and a plan approval. Mr. Bcardrnan said he �elt that this :oas -L-he basis of i�he City I��torney's ruling. (P•'Ir. Boardman and Mrs. Gabel both thought there had been rec�uests for variances in other to�anhouse de�Telopm�nts but a seaLCh �aas madc� through all townllc�use aata, and th�re was no record of any variances going tizr_ough the 1lppeals Commission.) Mrs. Sporre asked Mr. Boardman where this developm�nt did not meei� the R-3 requirements. Mr. Boardman said the only xequire- ment they didn't meet was the setback from public right of way. The area requirements are met, the opc�n space requirements are met. He said the City 1lttorney has interpreted the townhouse ordinance that any area recluirements, open space requirements, and setback requirements be part of th� a�proval of the townhouse development, and this included any variances nceded. Mrs. Sporre asked �vl�at variances they were being asked to approve in this townhouse pian? r1r. Iioardman said it was the 35' setUack fr.om public right �i way. They were asking for a blanket variance from 35' to 0' for �he garagc of some of the units. :He said there was 7' �rom the curb L-o the property line. Mr. IIoardman said the garage doors would not facc the streei:. ' LJ C_ J � � ' , Y1_annin Commission Mceting - March 17, 197G Page 25 ��} r'� , Mr. Peterson said that if he rememuered correctly, the reason for the placement o� the units as was presented was because of the topoc�raphy. rir..�IIoardman s�id thcre was a high ridge that pusYied tliese units closer �to the street. Mr. Scott said that as part of the 71-95 review process the Iiuman Rc�sources Commission �aas to conduct a hcaring on this application. Ratrier than have another public hearing, the minutes o� this meeting wi11 be parf: of thai� review. He said the A-95 revicw was a separate action. Mr. rar.r said they had a model of the development, which he thought ��Tould answer a lot of questions that �oer_e9�rmanc to this development. I-Ie said that if a greater setback was required, it would have a divcrse effect on this dev�lopment. D�r. IIarris said that he wasn't even considering the pros , cons of t�he variancc.s. He ��as more concerned with the proredure thcy �,terc follo:•�ing to grant the pro1�osed variance . felt they were circumventing th� zaniiig code. and He Mr. Bergm�n asked Mr. Farr to state the hardsl�ips involved in this variance requcst. P�1r. Farr said the hardship �aas tl�e cost coi�sidera�L-i.o:�, and �-ahether_ that ��aould be classified as a hardship, he dzdn`t }�.new. ��Je �-:ant to k�ep these particuJ_at tC�•JI7:- 11vYL::�LJ as lo�•r pr%ced as possible. G4e are loo}>inc7 fox- youna marri�ci coupl�s. 'I'nc size o� the unit.s vary bct���e.en 800 to 900 squ�x��-e feet. t��e w.ould 1i)ce to keep the pric� of these uriits in. the mid $30, 000. To do this, o.:e of tl�e considerations ��,as �o prov;c�e F.H.�. ii- nancinq., }J�=C:�.'US� trl•^ c�I�lO'•"'1t.1Z�.t.10T1 waS C�1Gc��e1" and the do�•�ln payr�lent was less, ln orc'�z: to gct F.H.A. fii�ancing, and bec<<use [4es-� Bavai'ian Pass connects to t���o r�ublic sLreets, Ivo_c�kz Innsbtuc,: Driv<� ar�d n1�tl�.ur Strcet, they hav� requircd that tlzis street be a public st��eet. ITe sai_cz thosc wer� the hardsh� ps that prevail. He sai.d tha-t uy making 1^��st B��v�.r_ian Pass a publ.ic street and adhcring to the 35 ` sct�acic, the develc}_:rac�nt wou7 d not be viabl�. He said we wou.la have to ga t� Plan B, and not hzve this as a public street, but qo back to a private street, and this ��;ould � have to Uc financed conv�ntion�ally, or do som�thing else. ry mal:ing the s�reet widcr, as you can see ]�y the nloc�el, �ae wotzld be dcstr_oyin�� a subsi�antial part of t.tzc site. We t�.ould be r':estroy- ing tiees, we �,Tould liave to change the ch�-sting topogr_aphy sub- stantially. The units are designed to fit into a hill. They all go up. ��Te haVe triec� to preserve puUlic areas.. The drive side and garage side are public areas, and the pedestrian areas ar•e private arcas. He said that as they widc�ned West Bavarian Pass we had to �ush the units together, so that we could develop a continuity of flow of the grce�i areas. Iie said that inste�d of having 300' to 400' between units, we have 100' or 70' less than that. He said they thought about �he set}:Uacks a gr�at deal when thcy designed the uiiii�s. He said that he felt thnt one of the r�asons for this sctback was to allow stacking of cars in front of a gar.ae�e. 1111 of the garacJes in this entire clevelopmciZt c.cre structured so that tlic cars dri.ve into thc side of i:h� gar.age. The sic�e faci.ng th� street was a finislied wall. There were no garage doors f-acii�g the street. Lach drivc way was an L slaaped �� .� ... ... ... .... . . . . .. 4 ri Planninc� Cammission Mceting -� March 17,� 1976 •• Page 26 ' � i � � drive. Iie said tl�e only struc�ures that would fa11 within the normal setback line are the garages. The units themselves would be 40' back from the property line, so he didn't think this would cause any visual bliqht, Uecause the garages were relatively small structures when compared to the units themselves. He said these were the basic rea_ons for asking for a varianc�, or whatever it is . Mr. R. M. Rumpsa, 1481 North Innsbruck Drive, said that when the single homes werc developed, they had to meet covenants that ��ere established by the Darrel 11. Farr Develapment Corporation. No��, when A4r, l,arr wants L-o put in another devel.opment, it seems that tlzis has come around aboui� 180°, because �his development doesn't even mcet� i�he sc:tback requir.cmcni.s. He said that when he bought his ].ot, he kn��w the.re was �supposed to be an apartment complex on this site, and he wasn' t so sure that that wouldn't be sti_�_1 ±he best idea for. i�his site. He said tlzat by putting homes in t'.e $33,Q00 ��o $39,000 range, that he felt that in 10 years, this would be a hell hole. , ' I�4rs . Sporre asked P�2� . Farr if he knew of any other t,c_?wnhouse develapment. where the gara�es were set so close to the street. Mr. Farr said that zn most -L-�,�anhouse dc�velopments the garages were � quit� close to the street. D1i-s. Sporre asked about public streets. Mr. Far_r said that the on7-�' townhouse de�elopmen-t that he kne�a o� that had al7_ publlc str_ee�s ���as in Albuquerque� Ne�a Mexico. P�Ir. Har?=is asked how ��;�ide laest �avari�zil Pass was going to be. ' Mr. Boardmaiz said there �aas a 50' i'ight of way, and the str�et would be 31'. I�Zr. Harris said he.didn'�t think they shouJ_d b^ allo�ved to lzave a 31' strect bccause a1I the other residential streets in Fridley ��aer-e 36 `. P�lr. Boardman said the F. H.I� . requirem�n t caus a 3 0' stree� , and tha-t th�re wer� just as many 31' residential strecLs in Fri.dley as 36` wide streets. Mr. Harris said that he felt t11at any curved street should be a minimum o� 3G' . I�e saicl he lived on IZivervie�-r Terrace which was a 3G' curved strcei:, so he kne�a tize piobJ.�ms. Mr. Scott said he unde7�stood that the townhouses in this plat woula ue a separate Townl�ous� I�ssociation. Mr. Farr said that was correct. r�r. Scoti� said h� could see pr_oblems in the maintei�ance of this aica, bec��use people in this price range of homes wouldn't be able i�o mairitain �.he area. 1 Mr.��Bergman sai.d he wouldn't b� aale to vote in iavor of this development bccause of the seLbac}c problems. Iie said he knew we were talking aUout setback problems versus nature, existing terrain, saving trees, c�tc. Iie said he }.new everyone was in favor of saving trees, but they also wanted to se� a reasonable amount of: the setb�zc}� requirements met. He said that with this street being 31' and the location of the gar_�ges, that he would feel like he was driving doti�n an alley, which he �elt �aas not the intent of having a pul�lic street. He said a variance requcst from 35' to 0' does not recognize �he setback requirement at all. Mr. Peterson said he £clt very uncomfortable because the . 4� � Planning Commis�i.on Meetinq - March 17, 1.976 Page 27 , ' Appeals Cor.unission didn't debate th.is issue at tlieir last me�ting. He asked Mrs. Gabel why tl��_s wasn't done. Mrs. Gabel said that when this came to ihc Appeals Commission they w�r_e told the City Attorn�y's interpr.etation, and wc were told we did not have to act on the variance request. Mr. i3ergman said he dic�n't thi_nk they shot�].d get a11 hung ' up on procedure. If someone says cae can approve or disapprove the plan, he would 1�e willing to do that, considc�ring the setback as part of the p1an. Mrs. Gab��l said she couldn't agree with Mr. Farr that a garage pJ_aced 7 feet �rom the street wouldn't be ' a visual blight, and she also felt that this would b� a traffic hazard. � � � , ' I� ' Mr. Boardmaz� said that a11 the gar_ages u;er.en't at the 0' setback. He said i�l�at instead of going thraugh �the variance procedure on every garagc, �Lhey just asked for a blanl:et variancc. T�e said that in most cases the garages �•rcre setback at lea:.,t 5` from -l-.he property Iine, and in other .cases, it �•ras a greater distancc than i�ha-t., but the actual request was for a blanket variance. Mr. Harris as}�ed if ther.e was going to be concrete curb and gutLer on �he Public �freet. of ���est Eavarian Pass. Mr. Boa:cdman said ther� would be. Mr_. Harris said the str�et woulci be b�i1t i�o City specificai=ian of 4" base and 2 1/2" �mat. I��r. Boar_clman said it �eould. A:r. Harris asked if on--��tr�et parl�ing w�u]_c� be uJ_los,Ted on ,tha_s s�treet. 1�1r. Boarciman said it would be allowed. A7r. �i�rr:is said tl�ia� assum.i_ng that a driving lane t•aas 8' , wil�.ch wou? d be tig�zt, becaL.se norrn<<1]_y they �•�ere 1?. `, a.nd witlz �traffic in botl� dirertions, tha-f. �,�ould be 16' , which wotzld lea�Te 15' � or p��.rkincl, r4r.. Boardman said ther_e will be t�•ro parking spac�s pro�,�icl�d for. cac]z ui�it. Mr. I3�rgman said thut in the ent�ire North Innsbrucic area, this site ha� been ciiosen �or townhouses for people o� Iower income families, and it seemed to him that lo�aer income people didn't get setbacks:and did get zlarrota str�ets. r1r. Scott asked i.f there �aas a diff.erence in the tax structure ' f:or a detached anc� �,ttaclzed garage. rir. Board.inan said he couldn`t answer tli�t qu�stion. (Notc�: City Assessing office said that . thcr� �aas no aiffei_cnce in the f;ax structure. ) � � ' ' Mr. I'arr said that he thought this townhouse development incoZpol-atc�d as many good plan�l�.ng features as he had Qver seen in a plan. He again quoted from the Metropolitan Council report. " The Respect for Topography in�Shapinc� Devcl.opment: The housing � can be built around i�he natural laiid icatures, ecologically important Uodies ot �ti�ater, marsh, c�aadlands, steep slopes, can remain in t.heir natural statc. In an area of gentle slopes,or terracc� totm}�ouses may be built to advantae�e. Narro�o Curbed or Dcac�-end Reside�ztial Streets: Planned Unit Developments can be flexible , in their use of roadways unlike the conventional grid or..curvc:d � ' � . ..,... _. .. ..._, _.. ,. __ _ ... . � .,_. _..... .... .,... ._ ._. .. .�„t I . �P � Planniiiq Commission Meeti_ng - March 17, 1976 Paqe 28 � ' linear street patterns in traditional h.ousinq d�velopments. � Resid�nti.al privacy and safety may be enhariced by stre�ts that are designed £or minimum tra£L-ic and reduced speed. Narrow streets � cover less valuable land as coell as intiil�iting heavy higl� speed tra�fic, as we11 as improve the appear_ance of the neighborhoad." � � �I � � Mr, rarr said these units in this development were not closer tog�ther than the units in oi�her townliouse additions. Th� fact that the setbacks were wrong because thi_s was designed for lower income people taas �iot correct because the dist�nce from garage to garage to street ���as closer in the other_ i�ownhouse aevelopments, �ahere �•�e werc taJ_ki_ng in a price rang� of $45, 000 -L-o $60, 000. He said that if the nublic s�reet was going to be a problem, then he guessed th�t thcy didn`t ne�d a publ�_c street. Nr. I-iarris said there were some things that went with a public street that va�reri't� requirem�nts wi_t1� a priva�e stre�t. . Mr. Peterson said this could eliminate so?ne people from being �' able -�o purchase a to�ti�nhouse in this area, if this went to a private street, because then this developm�nt �-aouldn't meet the F.H.A. requiremen�. I�ir. Farr said they f_elt that it �aould eliminate �I� u � � � � ' , � �I LJ ' I� F.H.A. fii�ancing. Mr. Farr_ saic� he c�aould like to read one mor_e paragraph from the Ne�ropolitan Council reporc. "ProvidiiZg diversizy of costs withii� PJ_a��ned tlnit Develap�n�nts was perhaps onc of thc more impor�Lani� gaa� s to be eventually mct. Publi.c at.tez�tion srould be directed to devc��.op �lexible public programs tliay._.Y•zi.l1: e.nabl_e a varic�ty of hci��ing types and costs to be ' increascd �-�ithin Planned Unit Develc�pm2n�s. The ?�ie-tropolitan Council �,i.11 be ��Tatchinc� the housing trelzds in th.is respect and will continue to eYplore various mearxs by which tlie qoal of increased divcrsi-�.y of housing casts �_ may be met in PI7D`s." �ir. F��rr said hc� und�rstood that the City had ordina�zces, and i�hai� the�r had to Zive w�_tl� them. He said tha� he didn't bc�liev� in i�letropolitan governmcnt, bi�i� he fii�nly believ�c� that l�ietr_opolitan government ��aas ma}>ir_g trem�r�dous inioads into local gotTernment, and tlzis may be becaus� of the inflexibility of some of the local orc�inanccs. I�e said this may be far afield from cvhat he ���as acldressing here, but he said that ardi_nanc�s ���er_e made by peo��l�, and ��eople can cha�zge them, and he b�lieved there should be more fl�:�ibility in local gov�rnmcnt. He said that all the considerai�ions the Plarining Coli�mission had brought oui� were valid. Someone wllo cou].dn't see aroui�d the corne.r, sno�-a removal, si�rect repair, emergency vehicles access, they �,-ere a11 very valid, and he appreciated all those concerns. He wasn't sur� that this project as it was desie�ned, did not provid� for aIt these things. Mrs. Sporre said just to point out that we didn't live in the dark agcs in I'ridley, the Environmental_ QuaZity Commission had as a goal to fos.t�r:r and promote innovative designs and she undcrstood Mr. I'arr's ati;e�npt to prescrve the contours and retain as much as you can of a k�eautiful site. Mrs. S�orre said that she couldn't make a motion,��but she would like to have this . ' � � Planninq C�nunission Meetinq - March 17, 197G Pac�e 29 � Q ' sent to the Environmental Quality Commission to revicw the beneiits of the pl.an as far as environmental concerns, and it might help in the final decision. ' � � � � , ' � � � Mr. Scott said that he agreed with Mr. Farr as to la�czl government sometimes being inflexible. He said that he hs.m�elf was an advocate of this. IIe said that as far as PUD developmcnts he didn't fecl that tYiere was adequate basis to dra��m conclusions from. Iie said th�-it if the Metropo]_itan Council ana HUD thought i�hat i�hcy could sit in St. Paul_ and ma}ce these kind of deci_sions, they wouldn't be sending ii� to a srna)_1. Commission sucli as the �3uman Pesources Com:nission for par.t of the A-95 revie�a. They have as3:ed us ta rev:i.ew these proposa.ls to see if they were cons�_s tGnt ��1ith ��;hat thc inteilt:iori of the program was . He said that both HUD and �ietropolitan Council have said thut you don`t conce�itrai.e lo�-� i.ncome p�ople, because they have had disastrou� resL�ltse ?3e s�i_d tl-i��t he felt with only a$6,000 difference ir� price range fo�. tl7�se tir�iL-s, L-l�.a�t t;lere cou�_d be �e�-ious probl�ms. Mr. Scott said that� �•�hat they �•�ere 1oo}cii.g at he ctidn't feel was a PUD. 1��r. I'arr_ said that �•:as just part of th� devel_oj�ment, and the e�ztire concept oi Innsbruc}, was a PUD, even if that �aasn` t the term appl.iec� to it. h1r. Ha.rri , asl:.ed 2,1r. Farr if it� �eou_1d be poss�_ble to widen �ti7es-t B�varian Pass to 3G'? D7i. Farr said he didn't �eel tha-t this �,�as necessai�y . Tl�e rec,t�]_at=a_ons f�r F. H. P.. only requi.a� e a 30` s��eetf but if the Ci�.y fel-t it �-�as necessary, it was probably somethir�c� tlZat thcy coulci do. t�r. I-Iairis saic3 tlzat curvcci s�.rects werc ��z pro�lem, �nd l:c fel.t th��t tliis str�et should b� 3G' widU. T�r. Farr said th,it �1�i�h the desigri of tliis de�r.�_lapinent, a 3G' stre�t m�.ght be to �h�ir_ U.c3vanta,e. A'Irs. Gabel. asl:�d ho�r far bacic of tlze c;ar_ages �aere the l�c�ll<,:� � located. I�1r. Fair said i�t was .about 30 feet. i�7rs. Gabel ask�d i� they couldn`t be moved bac3> fartliei �a:om the strc��i.? i�1r. Parr said it �aa� �retty ha_rc� to �tell from a pi.ece of paper, but thc , to�aogra�hy of_ �hc area ma}ces it vezy dif_ficult. Iie said that all the �:rees w�re locat�ed on the slopes. , Chairman I�arris aslcEC'� everyone tc�. look at the model, and maybe someone could come u�� wit11 an idea for this site. Mr. I'arr explained the top-�c;raphy and �he placement c�� th�� units. He said that somc� of the units �aere designed all on one leveJ., � for what he called "empty nes�t" people, people who have raiscd their families and were again alone, and wanted a smaller place to take care of. Mr. Farr said he lzad put in more work oii this � site, than any of the other sites Ize had developed. Iie said i�hey had been working on a plan for this site since August of ].975. ' � ' Mr. Scott said he didn't see anywhere on this development where t}�ere was recreation provided for young people. Mr. rarr said this land wa� adjacent to the City park to the North and there was a tot lot provided to tlle �ast by the 131ack 1'orest Apartmcnt. Iie said they wo��ld be constructing tW0 �CI11115 courts in the City Park, and there�was a tot lot adjacent i:o this site acioss�North Innsbruck Drive. Mr. Scott said that small children � � ' � �� � ' � , ' � � � 4 R , PTanning Commission Meeting - March 17, 197G _�"'Paqe 30 � would not walk two blocks to a par.k. He said that as this site was expected to be attractive to young people, he didn't feel � that there wer� adequate facilities for young people. �Mr. IIergman asked Mr. Farr if- he would consid�r some of the elements in this pro�osed plat. I-Iis par.ticular concernswere the lack of setback and the streeL- width, and parking, and he was wondering if Mr. Farr ���as willing to consider a compromise on the setback requir.ement. Mr. Farr saia that any movement of the units would liave an adv�rse effect on the wooded areas and he caondered what type of compromise he had in mind. Mr. Bergman said he would rather_ vary the setback fzom 35' to 20' rather than �the 0' . IIc� said this �-�as his personal opinion, but due to the hardships of the si�e, he fclt�tllis was a resonable compronise. r,r. Eergman said the other alternative was for Mr. Farr to request a recommendation on the plat as it has been prescn.z�d . Mr. Farr said that he could not economically reduce the density in this plat. He said he had a lot of money in this lando Iie sai.d it was zoned and planned for a 251 unit apartment building. He said that he r�ally didn'i: want to build a 251 unit. apartment bui.lding and he was not saying that if they didn't approve this, he was gcing to bui.ld a 251 unit apartmcnt building. He said that he felt this plarl filled a needed c,ral� in our housing mix in that part of the worlc�, and he honestly believed that this plan vras as �r�e11 thougl�t oiit as anv plan he had �come across, and he was sayir�g thai� in all. sincerity. rqr. Rumpsa z,zd anotlier pro�eity o��nc�r f_r_om the single family homes said they would ��ather see a 251 unit apartrnent on this site. , r30T_TON b� Scott, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Comm.ission close the Public Il�ari��g on consid�rat.ion of a pre- liminary p1.at, P.5. �176-02, Innsbrucl: vi].lage, by Darr_el A. Farr � Develo�m�nt Cor.pvr_ation. Upon a voice vate, a11 voting aye, ChaiJ�man liarzis declared the Pu1�1ic Ftear.izl?g closed at I2:55 P.M. ' h10TION b� Ber.gman, secol�ded by Gabcl, that t.he Planning Commission recommend to Council den.i.al of. the pr.oposed p1at, P.S. #f7G-02, Innsbruck t�illage, by Darrel A. I'arr Developm�nt Corporation, being a 1'eplat of Oui:lot B, Innsbruck North Addii:ion, along with r Lot �9, Audztor's Subdivision No. 92, generally located Nortli of North InnsUruck Drivc N.E. and �aest of the Bl.ack Forest Apart- �nent, primarily because of the Iack of setback from the public , street. � � � Mrs. Sporre asked w}iy they had made a motion for d�nial. She felt it should have been tabled, and the problems resolv�d. Air. Bergman said i:hat his personal vie�a was that this'wa� the � proper . action at thiS �:lIllC . Mrs . Sparre said that a motion for denial cic�ses the dvor. Mr. Scott s�iid that it closed i;he door on this plaii. bir.. IIoardman said no, ii: closes the door for any plan for six months. Mrs. Sporr_e said she thought this plan should be studicd in furi:ller depi:h. She said ttiat the �nvironmental Planning Commissio�i Meet�.nq - M1rch 1.7, 197G _ Page 31 [� S Quality Commission hadn't even l.00l:�d at this plan yet. She said tiiat AIr Farr's claim. that thcy had madc an eloquent ai.tempt to save, preserve and utilize the site to its fullest potential,.ancl she realized they had used the lowJ_ands for the road, and have classit-ied high lands as better, and she had some problcros with that, but she felt i.hat the Environmcntal Quality Commission could work with Mr. I'arr and develop this into the kind of a plan AZr. Farr would like to have; and s11e would like to see him have the onportunity. She said this plan was implementing one of the goals of her Commission �,�hiclz �aas to use innovative designs to uti_lizc a site to its best potential. Mrs. Gabe1 s��id she was not aware that a motion for denial would mean that. Mr, Farr. could not corne bacl; vaith any plan for this site for six montlis when she seconded i�he motion. She said she ��Tauld �.i.l:e to �aithd��ao� lz,^_r second to the motion, because she would lii;e i�9r. Farr i�o have tr.� op��ortunit�� to p.resent a better plan. r•ir. Scott quectioned �ti�hethe,� the second could be wit hdr�wn. He said a motioi� to table �,�oulcz superced� the moLion for denial and he �•,Tou.ld make sucli a motion. MOTIOP: by Sr.vtt, seco��ded by Pc�terson, that the Planning Commis_sion tab2e tlle consideratiori of a prelim.in��ry plat, P.5. #f76-02, Inn..sbruck ViJ_Iage, by Darre.Z E3. Farr Dev�lop�r.en� Corpor- atiot�, 7?ciny a r.eplaL- of OuL1ot B, Innsbruck ldorth Add.i.tion, along �•�i�h Z,oi 49, er.cept the t�'ester.ly 7.10 feet, Audi.ior�'� Subdivision iv'o 92, g�rera.7.Z� Iocat�d Nvrth Of 1�'orth Innsbruck Drive A'.E. and R'e.st of t1�e 731ack I�,orest Apart�:.`n�, because he felt that- lir. Farr had a g-ood p1an, bu� ihere wcre prol�Zems t11at had L-o be i,�orlced out, and tliis should b� reviec:��d bz,� any mem�er Contmi.sul.011 ��;ho t,-isl�ed to rcv_icrti� it, and it rome �ack on the Planninc� Comn�ission �agenda as soon �s passible. Upon a voice vote, a1.7 votir�<7 a�e, the motion car.ried uT�a��i�nously. MOT.TOA? by Peter.son, seconded by Srott, that the Planning Commissi.vn tal�lc the cotzs.i.deration of a townhouse development of I00 IT,�its, 1'-1/"I6-02, Ly Darrel A. Far.r Development Corporatzon, for I�ni�sbruck Vi1.7aye, until t1�ey reconsid�r the plat. Upon a voice vote, Berg:aan, H�rris, Peterson, Gabe1 voting a�e, Scott nay, thc motion car.ried. . A�ir. Boardman said that due to th� laten�ss of th� hour, the petitioncr for tlic next rec�u�st had left the meeting, but he had agre�d to the stipulations that rsr. Boardman �aould be nc�e;�ec� on this r.equc�,t, bui� because t.hcre were still people waii.ing in the audiei�ce for th� .following item on the agenda, he asked if tl�e order o� the agenda coulcl be changed. rlOT.ION by Scot_t, seconded by Peterson, that the order of the agend� be suspcnded, �o accolnn�o�7���e the p�bple in tl�e audience. Upon a voice vot�, a11 voting aye, the aqenda �ti�as amendea. � 6. � , PIlI3LIC Iil,?1I�ING: RrQUL:ST I'OP.` 11 SP]?CI71L ilSr PTRMT7', SP �} 7G-0�, 131' ]I1:NN.T.UG NI�,I,SON COT�S'I'P.UCTI�N�COi•t�?11NY: '1'o permit the � construction o1= a ctu��l.c:c and �, or. a.doubl.e bungalow, in an R-1 Districi: (single iamily dwelling areas), per rridley City � ' � ' �� ' ' EJ � � 4T Planning Commission Meeting _ Apri1 7, 1976 � Exerpt from April 7th rreeting: MOTION ONLY 1.. CONTINUATION OF A PUBLTC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. rr76-02, INNSaRUCK VILLAGE, BY DARREL A. FARR DEVELOPf�IENT �� CQRPORATION: Being a replat of Outlot B, Innsbruck North Addition, along with Lot 49, except the Glesterly 21Q', Auditor`s Subdivision No. 92, generally located North of North Innsbruck Drive N.E..and West of the Black Forest Apartment. 2. CONTI,IUATION OF A CONSIDERATION OF /a PROPOSED TOt�lNHOUSE DEVELOP��EN7 OF 100 U��ITS, T-r76-02, BY DARREL A. FARR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION r=nn T.i��rnni�nv vti i nnr- . ❑ MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission recommend to Counci� approval o�F a prelim�inary plat, C'.S. #7G-�02, Innsbruck Village, and approval.of a proposed town;,ouse development of 1D0 ixnits, T�7 76=02, for Innsbruck Village, by Darr�e'! A�. Farr� Development C�rporation, being a replat�of Outlot Q, Innsbruck North Addition, alang with l_ot 49, except the Westerly 210'S Audi�or's Subdivision f�o. 92s generally located North of North Innsbruck Drive N.E. and West of the Black Forest Apartment, with the following stipulations: i. Plan specifi�ations far streets �nd utilities are to be subn�itted to the City for approval. 2. Developer deed to the City, Innsbruck North Park, before arry plat approval or building permits are issued. � 3. 'fhe part af Lot 49, except the I�esterly 210's Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, that wasn't part of the plat, be dedicated to the City, as �Ghis was adjacent to IE�nsbruck Narth Park.. 4. Two tennis courts will be built by the developer on public park property, the 1ocation to be decided by the City, with the completion of 20 townhouses in Innsbruck Village. 5. Road design on West Bavar°ian F'ass must meet City approval. �: West Bavarian Pass sha'f1 be 31` wide, with no parking a�lowed an �he Ftestern curb of this street. 7. The minimue� setback f'or any garage on West Bavarian Pass shall be 5 feet, with one garage being approximately 10 feet from the property 7ine so that Z00'. sight distance from the curb is main- tained on the curb. 8. The de.veloper wi11 maintain the extension of North Innsbruck Drive from the City of Fridley line to Silver Lake Road until the last townhouse is completed. This extension will be plowed by the City of Fridley for a fee of $500 a year, to be paid by the developer. 9. The d�veloper will bulldoze a 7' strip along t�he extension road to be used as a walkway: . f. .. .o'� �� .. a � � ' , . . . . , ' ' . , , . :•�. . . Y . Y ✓ + °� [ ai��:S. % I , � ... ' � , � .. . � . ������ � ' ' ' ' i April 2, 197G � " � . '. • . , .: . _ . �•� , i . . , �� . . . . . ;,�: . - - . . . . .,� _ = . .. .� � � - � � . . ' . . � ,�: : . I . . . . � .... . . .. . . . .. . . ... . � � i t'�er,ibers of the Friclley Plannwn� Commission . _ _ � Fridley, Minneso�a . ' _- • .� . . . :. . . , _. . . ` - - Dear Commission Member: � . `{' , ,.. , ... . . . � I : ' ; - :-- � I am writin� to you in x�efe:.�z^t�ce i:a the Ta�j�sbr�:cl: Vi].la�;e project • which was the subject of a Ife�.rinG in f�an-L- of your Co;nmzssion on� , :�, � rS�.rch 17, 1976 0 �. . . � --.!� I ar,� hc�pe `ul -�hat this let-ce.r witl aid yau a.n yot�s' decision makin� ' ;" .� process at the Planninb Co�r�i.ssion meetin� 01: Hpx�it 7, 1976� I , =" E bela.eve it is inoortant tha��, a].l of your consa.der�tians and reser- _ vations be aclequ��el.y res^lved, �}IoT;rever, I, a1so, belie��e a.t is � critical to bring this mattex� to a resolu;ion as rapidly as possible _- -� for the fol�.owing a.�easo;�s: . . , ._ . -_.! � 1. Unt�.�. thzs projc.et� � s develaped in sc�::ne �orm ar other, �:_ ( t he resi den ts o f Inn s b r u c l c I� lor t h ��il�. have �to continue to experience t the inconveniences of constr��etion and the question o� considering . _ what wi11 acttYally be placed an this land. __ � 2. !`h.c canstx�ucti.orx s�ason in P�innesota is obviou�ly short and S.f w� are to succcssi ully' dev�lop -lhis �7T'O] CG-� in 197 6 and put behind us the proble�s me�.z t i_onccl �.n I �em �r1, a.�t is nGCess«ry that we start const-r.uc � io�z in tl�e mon�th o{ t•ia.y 197 6. �. .. - W� endeavored to answex� qlzesticins ra:;_sed a�t the first P1ai�nin ; Cam� . ;nissian He��ing of Mar.ch 3, 1976, a-� the tla.rcl� 9_7 Continued Hea�'^ing and, a1.so, by means of a men�orandum to the Ci�Ly S-Laf:� dated N;arch 8s 1976. ��te bel.ieve th� c�t��stzons have lieen ans;•rered ta �Lhe best o� ou.r al�i�.ity and we fu�ther b�la.eve �h�Zt the p:lan for 7nnsbruck V�ll.age taould complete the 1as � phase in a socioecono�nica)15• integr. a�ted plani�nd unit develop:�en�� of which the residents, the City o:E FridZey, and. our- selves, can be duly praud. . • " , ;.•, One question persis�ts and that is the maintenauce and care of North I �°.��;�.. innsbruc�k Jlrive from the Fridley City Line to the Silver Lake Road. �,�,,�.� , . � .�.;r • j � ' �: . �.�� :\'.,����.��i���. �. ����� ':� .''�. ' ,"' .L � .�r'�.~ � �. � .:.�r� ±��.�����T C��,. .�. 7280 1Jorth '72nd L�ne ;' r3znneapolis, t9n. 554'?8 �sa-8110 9 a .` � .-� ' _' ... � . : �� � �; � • ' •Y �. ;�� -: �I• ' a ' � ix+idl.cy Plannin� Cotn�nission I•l�mbers April 2, 1976 . Our proposal is as follows: , . . •. 2 ,•__ •: . . , :: .. �� 1. The developer will maintain the road throuoh surface patching, as necessary, until all ot the cor.�truc�ion on developer controlled Zand � in Innsbruck �?orth is complete. (As we a�reed at the March 17, 1976, Hear- i,.ng, we have patched the holes once and are in the process of patching them � a�ai.n because oi the heavy moistu.��^e content.) � -,� � � �l�!t "�1 2. The City of Fridley would make arrangemenis to ploca the road.. �� 3. The road woul�he turn�d aver to the City .of Fridle,y upon completion trithout �urther obliGation upon the developer for up-orading. � ' � __ „ The other probl�TM� tha�C received a large amount of serious discussion at the I�arch 17 Hearin� was thu stre�t ti��dth and the set back requirement for the _ extension of t•1�st Bavarian Pass from North Innsbruck Drive ta tir�lhur S-�reet. � This is the stree-t we propos^ to dedicate to the City. As we S.ndicated, our request to dedicate this stree-t and our request for a set back variance was predica�ed on our desiz�e to finance these units with the FiIA. ti�1e be1?_e��e thS.s irould aS.d ii� }:eeping the cos�ts down for the future residents, both in �ridinal selXing price and in main�tenance cos-�s. - , Because of -�he r4cent change in the i�7inn�sota Usury Law, it is possible to. . . fin�nce the project wi�th this pari:icular street being private. However, t•:e co:�tinue �to feel, because the stre�t connects North Innsbruck Drive �nd Arthur Street and because FHA financing i.s more desirable, the street shouJ.d � be public. � . ,. From a technical, s-tandpoint, we do not feel that the set backs Zs proposed 'tai1.1 crea�e any groblem for th� heal�th, saf.ety, and welfa.re of the r.esidents '� of the C.�ty oi Fridley: The visibility is equaZ to or be�tter tl�an the visi- � bilii:y in i:he Innsbxuck North sin�le-fami.]_y area tahere street widths are 31 , feet. i�;e do not �ee1. the set.backs, as proposed, hamper, in any way, str�et . maintenance, emero�ncy in�mess anci e�ress, or sno:a removal. By a11. traffic . sfiandar:Is, this street wi11. be lightly tr.aveled. �. � , ■ � � � F�e believe thar the automobiie _in our socS.ety deserves reasonable considera•ti�n; howevex, we bel.iev� it is -�ima �hat we plan more for peaple and �.ess �or auto- mobiles. To require unrealistic se�t bacics in this area would certainly have • � detriM=�nta1. e�zec-t on the p�oole ��ho will reside in Innsbruck North by virtue oi additio;�al �topo�raphical n:odirications and the lass of a vas-� nurr�er of the natural txees. ' S�1e met on Thu-r�day, April 1, 1976, with the Human Resources Commissian. At this n�etinb, -this Coromission ac�cd favorably on our proposed �lan. The Inn:::`uruck Idor�h iownhou�e A��ociation, consis�ing of approxima�Lely 130 i•a:ai.lie�, throu"h it� Loard oP Director:�, has indicated �their agreement `ai�h our P1a:i. j•ie have not had th� aPportuni�ty to r�.�et with thc Environmental �� . � . . . �, :,. . 1 . Fridley �'lanning Conmission t4embers ' April 2, 197G '3 � Commission, althou�h we understand th�y discussed the plan at a recent meetin�. At the Plannin� Comr�iss�.o-► n::e�tin� of April 7, 1376, �ae �aill prescnt a plan showing the cuts and i-ills required to develop the followino: 1. A 251-unit apartment building 0 ' 2. The Innsbruck Village plan as pro�osed 3. The Innsbruck Villa.ge plan with typical single--family set backs. � ' �de believe this wil], readily indicate the environmental impact o� each of the plans and shcr�� th�t the plan i•re ha�•e proposed is as considerate of the environr�ent as any plan could possi�.�ly be. In sur�nary, I would like to quo-te a para�aph on Page 9� of a housi�g report from the t�etropolitan Council, d�-ted February 1974, enti��].ed, "PUD: Trends and Experience In the I�letropolitan Area." � "Providing a diver�>ity of costs within PUD's is perhaps one of the � more important goals to eventual].y be met. Public attenfiioz� should be directed �o deveiop flexible publ�.c proUx�ms that wi�l enaUle the variety of housin; types and costs to be in creased within PUD's. The Couneil will be taatchino the housin� trends in this respect, and wi1.1 continue to expl�re �� var.ious means by c�r3iich the goal of ancreased diversity of housing costs may • be raet wi�hin PUD � s." II belS.eve the key phras� in �this p�ragraph is, "Public attention should be directed to develop i�ler..ibie public pro�rams..o" I seriausly.hope that the above tiaill aid you in your pen3ino dec�sion. '. Very szncerely, ' UAR;ZEL A. FARP. DEVELOPi:EI�T CORP. �"'-----�--�---�--�.�� ���;��.:�.� ���--�--..----.. , �� ' JARREL A. FARR � • . 1 Fresident . .: . DAF:tcb . � • Attachtr.::�t � ' . �. � � � r . IIiP�SBRUCK '�;�RTH . Per,�i�tted zoning pursuant to the L2velopment Agreement entered into in 1971 be�tc��een City of Fridley and the Darrel A. Farr Development Corp. l�aelling units in place 3g2 Rer.►aining allo.;able dwelling units Balance of Vienna Tormh�n�s Remaining a�.lowable d«=elling units " I?iaelling units proposed in Privacy �iome area (Recon:n�nd�:d by Planni.r,� Co�nmission 3/17/76) Remaining allowable dwelling units Dwelling units proposed in Innsbruck Village iini-ts allowed for by zoning in er,cess of proposal . C � . 850 � 458 � 24 434 100 334 100 234 ,. _.. � ••�R .. � f '^s� •. .,� . .� , y • . ,' ' � April 2, 1y76 0 , ' INPTSi3�U^': r;OP.TH ' InnsSruck ?�orth, if developed totally �s i��e presen-tly propose, �aauld contain the fol?o:•ring housino types, densities, and price rar.ges: iiousing Dc•rel].in ; Dwelling � T�pe Financing Units Units/Acre Price Complefiion ' Sin�le-Family Converitional 122 � 2.5 $ 60,000 -$150,000 70% :�etached , � 'To:;nnouses Conventional 102 7.8 $ 35,000 -$ 60,000 2000 To�.�bo��s Conventional 56 7.0 $ 39,000 -$ 52,000 570 Ap�r�m�nts 221D-4 25£3 23.4 $150.00 to $223.00/mo. 970 ;%�To:��houses� Conventional 100 ' 5.6 $ 40,000 -$ 55,000 Starting %�To:�ano�es FHA proposed 100 8.2 $ 30,000 -$ 34,000 Starting 'Predicated on the above table and assumin� 25� of a pers�nts or family's income can co:z.rox�tably be spent for housing, this would indic�te an earna_n�s ran�e af thc resilen-i;s of In*�sbruck P7orth from $7,200 per year to $66,000 per year. � A.ii of ti�e individua2 housin . unii:s in Innsb c - � ru k Villa�e �-li.i_l contain the followin� in �he base pricc: ° r , ' � � Central air conditioning Vaulied ceilin�s At�ached and detacned �arages Ceramic tile baths A1� oak trim and oak cabinets 0 �'t%Cv�11::G• of ever-increasin„ CO:1S�Y'UCt101� CO:itS, the prices UTl t�l@ proposed toc•mhomas � a�� to�rn'�oa�es cJi21, in a.11 2:ike2i}ioo�1, iner•case betc�reen naca and the sel.linF sea��n. � �'��• do no;., as yet, h�ive f:irm co�ts on the brick and mortar construc�tion items. • . • � _ . . � . � . , t ' Y .t � � � ' � ' � ' � Pl��rani.r�c� Commis:�:ion Mcci;inq `_ r7a�-ch_3, __197G Pac� l� ]�I_i1llI�].1lCJ &50 unii:s a.n th� R-3 •r.oned praperty, and nova tliis proposal ta�i;� do�:n bc]_ot•� G50 uziiLs. t�de wcre a1sU proZ�osing at that time, to have avcr 350 units be�c•��een rr�idlcy and Silver La}:c Road, �•rl,ich also woulcl }�ave bc�e�l f.ui�nelc�d to this intersection. II� said that_ u�hen the P�.1mcr nr:i_ve inLel°scction wa�� compl.eL-ed, i�he traffic patL-erns wil]: work for i�l�is ar�a . Chairman F��.i.rris a;lced what we were goi.nc� to do in the mc��ntim�? IJc� s�� 7 d th�ti. miy}it no L- llappen i�or 5 ye��i s in New L�ric�hton . Iie said tie lic���;:d t.t�at t,r. T'ur.i ���auld uc� succc:_.���7_ �a�_th t}.zese two to��mhousc� dc�ve�lopmcnts, Lt7i� v,-ii:l�ou� a e�ood access to Silvc�r La}:e I:o�ld, he tlZOUC;Iit i_i� waulu be or�e� big prok�7_em. P�-�r. Lanqen:te7_d said t}zis acccess was llll�01t�111L" from �he slfc�ty sl-_�-�ndpoa_ni� l-.00 az�d ior accc:ss for �ire nro-�ec-�ion. and other ernc�rgcncy vei;i.cics. I�3rs . 47ahi1�e:cc; said tha l, tahel-� the C�_.t�% was check:i.i:g on the accG ;sib_�_1,it:y foi� this a:rca p�rh�::ps t1_ze Ci.ty coui.d ��c:dr_�ss itse.7_f one I,lc,re tirr�e to the sp�,�ci prol�?J. ��i�n o�.i i�orth Irinsbruck Drive , and see .�f any �:dciiti�n�J_ st:ap sic�,zs �,,�u1d 3ZeIp sol�,�e the prob=zern. ��ie sa ic� that �.l uT,r�?.L'_I1C� i�7� �st on 1�0�: th Tn?ZSJ.�r_ ��cl: Driv� that �.hc�i r should be a ��.Jariiing sic�n a:s you come around t��e curve to -ch�� ex�_st.irig sto;� aic�,�, t}lat thcr.e v,�as a st_o�� s�_�sn anead.� Sh� said she lZad sc�rn a�o�� of peo�le z.ip t.11rough tliis s�top sign b�c�.us�.� i�l��ey clidn'�t kncG� i�c Cvra_: the.r. e r L�ari�ict� 1�...r. 1.y ozi Lhc a.cc e tlpcn � voice vote, a11 voi.iT�g aye, the raotivl� caxried unal�ir�ously. 1.U1'IOR� b1 Pe�er�on, seconded b� L'e.r�rm,sn, that the Pzal�ri:�g Comr�:ission r.ont�nue until 1'�4arch 17, J97G, the cons�dezation of a toranhcizs� c3evel.oprn�nt� vf 100 un.it.s, T.-Ti76-0]_, by Darre.Z A. Farr Deve.7.op�rient Corporation, for Inlzsbzuck lVoi�t1� Townnouses IV and V �ldd_itions. Upol� a voice vote, aI1 vot.il�g aJe,_ thc motion r.arr_ied unaniinoi.islz). '� 4. PIJBLTC IiL1�12TI�TG: C:.O�:;;1:DET:A`.L�7-0�? Or^ A PP.};L:CI•1INr'1RY PLAT, P. S. � 76-0?t 1NNSI��:UC1� V1LI,�;C�l:, J3Y D�'1F:I'.;]_� A. I'I�I'��; DT`,��,LOP� �,`J' CCRL'01Z��T1�� - B�ing a rGp1_aL- of vut]_ot i3,. Inrisurt�cic North r��id:i.�ion, ��long Hrith. �Lot 49, except th� T-�Testerly 210' , Aud_itor's Subdivision T�o. �2, qenerally 1_ocatcd Nor.i�h of Nc�rth I�insbruck Drive N.�. and West of the Black I'o.rest Apartment. 5. co�sznrrin'I'TO:�T OT? A TOt�'NHOUS� D�VLl:�Oi';��ENT O�' ]_00 UNTTS, 7'-;;7G--02, }3Y DAR127,L �'�. F711:}: D1�VELOPP�ilii��' CORPUI:A'1'ION, IOP INNSI3ht1CI; V:LL]:,11G1�. rir. Darrel Farr, Mr. Jim London, and Mr. John IClick, ar_chi_tect for tlie towiihouse development in Ini�sbruck Village were present. r10TTON b� Peterson, secanded by [aahlberq, that the P].ann�.ng Commission open the Public Ilcaring on the co�sideration of a prelim.inary plat, P.S. i�7G-02, In��sl�ruck Village, b� Darrc�I A. Farr Deve�lopmeni ' Corporation. Upon a voice vote, a11 votir�g a�e, C�hairman llar.s'is declared the Public Uearing open at 10:02.P.M. �' � ' ,�-- . ' ,� Plannin�c Comrnissi_on Mect=inq - March 3, 1976 Page 1G Mr. Boardman said thi_s nreliminary plat was for the construction of 1U0 i:ownhouse UIllts in what va�s i�l�e si�.e location for a 251 unit apar.tm�izt buiJ.cla.izc�. Theie �ai11 be a publ.ic street in this pl�zt WI11C:r1 wil l�bc Vdest Savar. ian Pass . The spur roads of f of the public s t=reet �aill be priva�.c stre�ts. There wil]_ be a separate to�anlzouse association for �hc townhouses in this plat. rir. Bergman asked for clar_if_ication of the public ro�d as far as City specifications. r1r. Boardman said ttlis public road wou].d have a 5U' right of way and the street GJOUI.C� be 31' wide. Mr. P,oardrnan said the.re will be 25 structur_es, �aith 4 units to ' a stiuc�Lure.. They are 'for sale` property, -L-hey are not rental pr.operty. I�ir. T'ar_r_ said tl�ev had a mod�l b�iilt for this development- which they had at the meeting. They thouqht this �aould h�lp explain this devc�lo;���c�nt to the Plannina Cornmiss�_on and to the people in the audicncc. It sho��as the topogra.�l1�J oi the plat and lzo��a the uni.ts u�i1i be locai�ecl on i�he p]_at, �nd hoG-; Lh�y rellte to the street a.nd each o�L-her. P2r. I?arr said the units were d�signed to h�ve two rambler type uni ts ira the front. ��Jith full basernents, witlZ tGJU units behind tl�a-L- ���er_e �ither rari;bler units, with a stora,e area all on the same leveJ_ , or units wi�ii a ���all:-out basement � He said they managed to keep thc st�_cets on onc side of all units, so the sLree-L-s doiz't go on bo�h s�:dcs as they would in �� typical 4-unit building. He said. a problem in mosi to�ar,lio����se devel_opr:lcnts �aas that �ahen you drive do��an the stree� you see a row of garac3e doars. This �aas true in the existing cicv��lopmentt In th.i:� deve�_o��n��ntf ��v� broug�it al1 the driv��aal�s in on �he sidc� of the g�rages so th,e_ front �ai11 b� tl-�e facade instead �f the garage doors. Mr. IClic}: said the units that wer� faced to the c;reen space wot<ld have attac.hed garagcs whi_ch helped alleviai�e the ro��r of garages facing the fr.ont. He sai.d the design of the uni_ts provided for driveLOays and garage doors to be on t7ie lower pa.rt of the hil.l, and as the sJ_ope of_ the land decreases, the units si�ep up thzt sl.ope, so there would bc� less cutting of the ]_and, and that �a�s arz ai.d La th� retent.ion of the tree cover . � M.rs . 4�7ahlb�rg a blanlcet variance t11� variance. �� ' ' �J said that these wez� i�he units that you were asking on. r1r. Klick explained ��tiich units would need I�1r. Langenfcicl aslced �ahy there cvasn't a public road in other tok�nhouse developmeni�s. Mr. London said they have lcarned a lot aboui� townhouse d�velopmcnt sincc they started, or else there probably would Iz�ve k�een a public road in the other developmcnts. Mr. Farr said he didn't i�l�ink tlie Cii�y wantcd a public road at that point in time. Mr. R. G. Rumpsa said he was concerned about. the price range of thcse tawnhouscs. Some of the single famil.y homes were in the $150,000 brackct and he didn't think tha� moderately pric�d townhouses were c:ompatiU].e with tha� type of home. IJe 1:hougliL- these towiitiouses would dctract from the property values of the single family liomes. � � �� Pl.anr�i.nc� Comm�:�s�_on A1e�ti_nc� -_ M<arch__3, ].976 _�'�g�'- L� � �i � 'I�1r.. T'�.�r_r sai.d tl-�at laefor_e one sir�c3l,e iami_ly loL- was sold ihe comi�lcte p].an ��tioi�os�.il �aas comp].ct.c.�d, <�nd thc pc-�ople who bouglit iho:�c :lcta l.nc�w t:h�i� tlzi.s particu"l�_�a- sitc ;��a.s for a 251 unit ap��rtntent complc.:;�. !l� s�:i.�l thi; i�r_opos�+l h�as 1:7een ch�z�gec� to 1-�avc� on).y 100 � u2zits on this pr_operLy, wr,:i_ch would be owner occupi.cd to�anhotzses. 'They w�ulc� I�c ;�malJ_ uni.t_U, but i�l�iey �-�er-� wc�ll c�csic�l��d and would bc� �z good transa_t.i.c>?i f���om i:h�� Bl��ck I'or.cst. I��urt_ment cornplex. He Uaid the price i��znc-� of thc-� a•�art,�icaii�5 in tliis complex �;�as $1.50 to $2:1.0 a��or�{�l�i. Tlze ' J t p�or.�lc c:<<�o cculci af�fard to pur_ch�.ise a Loc��n.ltousc� in L1ie $3:?,000 to $39, i?00 r��nc�e ��.oti].ci Ue eerin�.L-il��_c to the pco;�lc who livcd i.n tliis I� a}��rti��erit r.oripl�:�::. He i�l�auqlzt p��oplc, of a.1.1 ineoinc� rar�ges shoulc� be ab;_c ta livc �.n rn�z� hr.ucl: i:i t11F_�y so d���s.�.rc�d, and that i�his to�anhouse C�E'_VC'�.C�ti:RC`I"li= 41�]S ��OOCi SCiC110—C'C:OI7Cif:l:LC �lia]Z11].I1C�. � ' � � P3�'. Ral<.�rrc� S �1nski sa �_d tl�at he I1c�.C�� :)L1S L" purchas��d a lot o�1 l�rtt,t�r St:ruc.t ic}r $�.�, UOU, a»,� hc� wa.� concern��d. about th� el_e�jati_o�zs oii tl�is pr_opo��`:d plat, ana �•:�ia.t that �vot�lu' do to lzis loi�. He c�lor,aer_ed :L� r11.S lOL W�.tS C�O.1.T1C� LO ��C-.`CC�'il"iC' L!Sc'_iGSS� Ui= \NllciLj. Air_. Lonc�on founc7 i�:r. Si�i��s]•�i' � lot on Art17.��� �treet arid -L-old 2�irn ho�; t.his plac G��ith i�he str�icL-t.lres �vo�.iic� ielate t_o his loz. N;r. S�lI7Skl �:�i}�E'_ �. V;'ti'=.�11 ti7�?1' i����?�1a1GG 1:0 SL�iI"ii C017S �J�'U�t:l_UIl O:� t�'1�`�G-` ta�,>n7�o�.lscs'? r'?�. I'arz s��id he �a�L�].d )_il�e to start as soo:i as h� liacz an��r_aval iro,� the Ci_tye t7r. Stinski ask��i if th� City �ireet ha� been approv�d? I�ir. � ?�oard?r.a11 said th.��� was all_ in t'��e considcrai�on o�= the plat. I�?r. I�clurc�rr:ar sa?.d that h�� hzd bccn ir� c�r1-c�ict w�ti:�. tlie �� .�:.A. und they ��7C'.Z'C' C.jO:�_1"1C� c�Wc"?1 f1"OP�l ci.L1. }:JiJ.Vc��E:'. :;�:1=C,C:GS 1I7 c`i t:04ti'TlZ1012:�E� G?CVL'ZO�??i�'27'� ai�d ��ac��e no�,.�� lcoki�zg tor pu��l_ic streets � t��7e c�.o have some pri_vate ' streeLs 7.n thi_s pl�zt., btat I'.�I.1�. vaas agreea}�le to �Llzat. rar. Boa_rdn-��n said this pla � so th� t it �^i Ca. .ri �� � IZ L �l S�— 3 C �. �� �� �—� l— . this p7_at, �ahicli �oas tizat. I�1���. ra�:r meets th� R-1 for: ti�at �41��t �onect I;-l. �,as reducing -t.h.e dens:ity oz� i_equi_.re���nts although this pro,�erty of Lot 49 that was included in Asr. Stinsl:i sai_d that �the s�_ng].e family development in. Innsb.rucl� �aas just starting -L-o yo good in tliis a���a, and he d�dn`t think the City shauld jc_aparc3ize t:izis developm�rit �-aith somei�liing tha� could be detr-im�nt�l to t=he ar.ea. ile said he thouc�}it they sllould �Lake a gc�od 7.aok at tl-�e amouni� of traffic th��t would bc qenerated by more developr�len�� in this area. . Mr. Donald Peter.son, 5595 Ma�.terhorn Dr_ive, said he was concerned about the traffic �1ow, as oi�hers. E�� said tl�at h� didn't thiz�k any one cauld argue v�ith the planning of having townhouses as a tr.ansition £r_om i�he apart�ment complex to the single family homes. Ii� said he did question the differ_encc in grade for the townhouse units, which was up to 7.0' i.n some places. Ii� said the type of consi:ruction would limit tlle desic�n of tlzese townhouses, than if th�y werc on a ilati�er piece of grouild . IIe said that on tlie other plat discussed a� �Lhis meciiilq, the to��rilzouses were more cxpensive, and tli�y were b��i�1� built in units of 2 to lesscn the necd for cut and fill. This arca w.�� �ust ���heavily woodec�, and yet �hese to�anhous�s were being built in wlits of 9, and 1-ie didn't undersi:and the logic of that. �� ' _, ' � � � � ' ' � rt Plann.i+ncJ Co�nmis��i_on Meei�ing - M�:�7.cli 3, 19"l6 Page lII Mr.. Pc�Lerson said he also qucst:ioned why two of these units would or�ly be lbout 10' froin i:hc ��raper_ty line. NSr. Farr said he coul.dn't r_espond to th�_s wi�.hout gettinc� qt�itc upse�. Tic �aid hc clicln'i� fcel t1laL the pcopl_e ].iva_nc� in tlic s:i.n<�lc� family homc�s in Tnnsbrucl; had � any mar. e ri.ght to livc in Inn�U��uc): than ttie people wilo will la.ve i.n this a.rca, as h�: had said be:Lorc. I��r. Fai-r_ sai.d that: Mr. St.i.nski �aa � on� of. the largest� l��ndl.ord�s iri tlle ;�Ici.ropoli_tar: are��, ancl }Ze ciic�r�'t feel tl.zat thc� testiinony l�i� liad given at this me�ting did hi_m cr.cdit. ?�ir.. John I<l�_c;: szi.c� he ���ould li.?,c to resr�ond to some o.f the com:nczlt�s rnade ori tl:c �ro}::o,ed ur�ii:� ro.r thi:� devclo��mc�ni�. Iie s�:�id �:�1E?SC' I1I11tS ��JC1C'_ CIC:�].C'?I7('_C� �,Xj�%1E?:�S�.y fOY; 2. C3.]_��e1eI1CC'. ll1 CJl'�1CI(' Oi 10 to 7_5 f��t. I1� saici th.e•y would nat �,Tork oii a flat piece of lande Tlicy �:�e.re ur�.i�s th��t �a<�,e on� story on one si_cic �.nd two sto.ry �zni_t on tlie u��pc�r siUC� o�-_ the slope, givi.ng Uo�h uni_t�s tl�e availa'.�il.i-l.y of <� �-�alk--aut ty�.c vi situ�t�i.o:�. Iie sai_d tha� it �aas not a trt2� statc�?c.nt tr:ai= ui.its cauld.� `�L- ��e ci��si;r;ieci far this typu of slo�;� situa;�i.o;7. I�r. Harris as}:cd I•1r. �a�3ruman i_i th.is L-o11a��Jed tl�e con:prehens�_ve plan. T�'ir. Boarc�m��n �.aid ii� di�. T��rs. ��;ahJ_},�, rc� suid t?zal� 51i� noticcd i.]Z��L ^lOSt or tY�e sinq:!.e fa����_ly d�velo>».:��nt ��;as i�:ortl: 01 i�:.._....�Z Tnnsbruc?� nr.iv� N.]�. She as}ced :: 1�ZY'. Z''cal:'I' 1i l�G' 11c":lC� C'V�:l CO1`�.�'i_l.CAr_`� f�'Ci i1c�.l%li!C_J tllE� Il101G' E?:�j�� T151.VC? {�OG'Jli�:011..°�°_�� on ti;is plat, and the sraal.ler to}.;�nl�ot�ses on Lh� otl-�ei plaL-? ' I�ir. I'arr �aid tl����r hadn't. �Ie said there were rnol�e sinqle far:ii ly lots Sou th �f �;�orLlz Tnnsb�'ucic Dr�ve than �l�e.rc_� werc Noi �h o� Nortlz Tnnsl>r�acJc L�rive . � � � ' � '. � ' 1�5r. P,um�sa said the lak� sep��i.ated the single family homes f.r.om the to�4anhouse arca Sottth o-L- I�7ortlz Inn.sbruc}: Drive. It v�as a natural_ bar_xiei . . M.r_ . Fumpsa a� ked �zbout the homes sta?-tc�d i.n the single family area Sauth of North Innsb.ruck Drivc, that h�ve never k�een com}�1_et�d, �nd how man�r unsold to�anhouses there were. He asked if these Gaere just going to be left stai7ding, and if both these plats would be startcd at the same time, �aith �Lhe sam� results. AZr. Farr saa_d tha�L he didn't own the R-1 lots and had nothing to do �,�i�h the const.ruction oi' hom�s on these lots. fIe said that he only h�:d t�ao unsold townhous�s in t11e developed area. When lle had appraval of tllc�sc iwo new plai�s, he planncd to start coizstructi_on immediately. IIe would like to stari� this construction this spring, and boLli �lats would be construci�ed at tlie same time. Mr. Langenfeld asked P�ir. Farr if he had any kind of report on wha� r�spoiise lie would have as to tlze occupancy of tlie new unii�s. Mr. Farr said he hadn't had a formal f�asibili_ty study mac�e, bui. they have.GO to 70 couples a week going through the model, if that was any i.ndication of the interesl: in townhouses. � Y ' �, � _ 1?l��nn.i.nc; Co7nmi.ssioi� _Mec�tii?g -__:__Mar.ch 3, 197G�_,_+ I�ayr. 19 .�IOTI.OrJ b� Langenfel ci , s�eondc��I l�c� 13er. qm�tn , ih.2 t th�� P.ic71113.Ll��f Cornmis�;ian c1o�c� Lttc Pub.l.ic Ilerzr.�.i.riy or� tlie cvi�s.ider.�:,ti.on ot a pr.•e1.i_rn.in- ary n1�lt, P..S. 117G-U2, 1i�n�,1>>�uc•�; Vi.11�a�c, Z�� thc� Da.r.t•�1. A. Fa.rr Ur.vc.lo���ncnt Cv�•per��t�on. (il�vn <:i vo.7.cc vote, a1Z vviin�7 ayc, Ch��i.r_m��n N��rz'.is d�c.Iarcd tl�c I'ublic ll��ar�.�.ny c].vsed at: 1U:35 P.1�1. P•5�-. IIc�_qm,�n s��id there sec�.mccl i.o br�� sorn:� discret�aricy bei�wc�en thc� por. ti.on of Lot 49 that: ��,ras ccr�sidcrc,a p��rt ol tliis ��r.operty, a��.� W17i1� �^?�7S �7�.�ttt'.CCi. T�ZI . �O�S1�C�Illi117 �;�11C� ��1C'1"f� 4v�3..`.; � �.1i1C� lt �:�ciS 011C'. Of tl��. si.i;�ulatiorls i_ii.:it I�;�'. i�����° dced t� t=hf� City th�?t �>ari= o� ;r.,o�: l�l not n:�ecied fo1- �hi_s �.�].�i:, to be incluctc�:3 �aith Inn�l�ruc}: ParJc. T�1rs. G�7�ih].I�er.g said {.h��t. many of th.�> c7ucstion�; that ��3e had di_sc;u��scci on C���- I��cviau�, p1.aL arc: rcl.evarlt to this p1�t, particula.r.ly thc i�rai_:`ic flo�a, sc> ma17be c_his �?l:elimi_nar_1� p_l.at �hould be tUbled also. � l�%OS'I�OrV t�u Z;��n�l�rlfe�d, sec_nncic��l b:� [�Jah.Zhery, thaL- tl�e P1a��niny � C07�it�i.lS�;iCli i` `f1i.:7_ 1'7".` U_'7t'.) ��ir37'CCl 1%� .)_�IC�� tllf'. COI].,.7.Cle_?2'3t1011 U�" e� p.relir�,���:l��y p1ut, F.S. •`17G-02� IJ217SI�1'i1C�� Vi11�.ge, b� Darrel_ A. F'arr. De��elop:r��1sL Corporat.�on, l;c_in� a t:F�plat o.f_ O�.?tl.ot 13, T.nnsbr.iick I•�orth ' I�ddlt:iv:�, alor�cr r,�zuh Lot �Sf, eicct>t t.he [,�si.�rly ?.10`, Auditor`s Si.tbdi��.is.i.olf Ido. �7., gcncz:ulit� 1.or.�zted P1o1°th of IJor�th Inris�iruc3� T�r%ve Id.P•,. u,7d Iles� of tlle B1acJ: 1'ore�f= i�p��rL:r�ez7t, becau.s� thc� guestions ' asned cn i:7e ot.hc�r p1ut, �ti�vulc� h«��e to be con:�idered in a determination on i:h.?s p1Ut. Upo.� � voice vot�, a11 vvt.in� aye, the rnotion car.ried U11 Z17111tOU�.l�. � ' � � FSOTIOl7 1�y I3ergm���, secoz�ded r�t) Langenfeld, tl��.�i: the F'1at�ning Comr.?is;�_io_n cerii.il:ue u11ti1 �'7��rch 17, 1976, t?�e considerution of a t.cwnl�ouse d�velc,p;:�ent_ of 100 Units, T-r76-07., �y Darrel A. Farl� Dev�lo�r;aent Cvrporai_ior�, for_ Innsbrucl� Vi1lac�e�. Upon a voicc vote, a11 vot-ing ac7�, ihe moLion r.arric�cT unan.z�r.ousT.�. Cl�iuirr,�an Harris decl.a.r_ea a r�cess a-t 10:40 P.hi, anc� r_ccanvened �Ll��e meetinc� ��t 11: 05 P. N. 6. CONTTI`UI�I�: I�EVIJsi9 OZ',PRI�APP�L1Ci1TIQN �''OP. COb;NiUI�?ITS.' D�VFLOPI.�I's_,'p�!T L� L 0 C i� G T3i'�N `I' ---- Mr. Boardman said tl�c preappl��ication for a Community Dev�lopment Block Grant that was in th�� agend� �•�as the revised preapplication that taas requested by the Planninc��CommissioTZ at their meeting of I'ebruary III, 197C. I�e said that he�, had handed them a copy of the Metro Council A-95 review of this pi'�,eapplication. This review was on the revised preapplication thai� tY�e Plaz�ning Commission now had. D9r. Iioar_dman said they had dropp�d`\ i.:he proposals for obtaining � the property North of CiL-.y IIall for a C�.vic Center and for the acquisition of 10 lots in the River_view Heic�hts aiea. He said he had talked to John 1Cari �rom i�he r2etropo itan Council who said that Fridley had a much bett_er. chance f:or fund'.ng without these two �� proposa.l.s also. He said �:hat all the fun��' ng requests now perl:aincd to i:he housinc� plan. ' -•�..�: � � , • �, EXCEI!' FROM i�1INtJTES OF HUMAN RESOUP.CI:S COMMISSI:ON MEETING OF � n�'RIL :1 , 1.9'l E> : i)L'I.I�L:l;.�'T�COi�d Oi�1 Df1l:I:F'1� I'AR}Z 11PI'LICAT:J:UI�1 FOR ll�:V};LUa'i�i,;i�1`l' Ci' Ii�,idS�31ZUCK ViLLAGL � �J ' MEt�l�3FRS PRESEPdT: MEI�IBERS ABSEi`T : WILLIAM SCOTT, BARF3ARA SHEA, NANCY LAMBERT, GI�CE LYP1C�i, HAROLD BELGUM NQNE OTHERS PRESEI�dT: DARREL FARR - APPLICANT JII� LONDOi� - ENGIi�1EER FOR DtiRREL FARR CORPORATI0;1 JIM LUKI�SZEWSKT - INNSBRUCI< NORTH TOWI'dHOUSE ASSO�. JACK LINDSTROM - INNSBRUCK I�dORTFI T0�^1NHOUSE ASSOC . Pl�T BRENNEN - LEAGUE � OF ���OI�IAI�I VOTERS I�ED STORLA - YPC � DENISE LYi�?CH - YPC LAREII IiETC�LF - YPC Mr. LuJ:asze�•as):i. read aloud the position of the Board of Director� of the Innsl�ruc}c I��lorth Townhouse Associatioi� on the �'arr devel- oprnent on the land north of Inns�ruc}: Driv�. Their position reads as folla�as : 1. Uue to some confusiolz that exisis, �et's make certain the record is se-i: straigh-L--the townhomes proposed ir: this area ar_� in no way, {o�.�ma�_ly or informally, to be construed as part of our e�istil7g association. 2. The townhomes p]_anned for that areu, if properly maintai_ned, do not seem to present any adverse effects �to our neighboi�ncod. lhe design, cost ran�;e and proposed developmelzt plan have been considei�ed in ihat s�atement. �rle do have one concern in the realrrl of the mainte�zance of that property: a. We believe the townhomE�s are �to be par-L- of ' an association, although we have no basis fox� . that belie�. b, t�Je believe the maintenance and up}ceep of that. �� ' developmerit will be very difficult if an � association is not for�med. I_J � 3. Current city planning studies seem to indicate a broad •� socioeconomic base in a neiUhborhood is a desirable attribute in a n�ighborllood. We believe that �.f a1.1 parties concerned, notably ; Innsbrucic North To���nhouse Association, �the single fami_ly llom�s, the apartments, this new associati.on, continue to mai�ztain theii' OWI1 properties theri there will be miiiimal problems in the future . Mr. Lukaszewski added the plan appears to a competent and unique plan foz� a nei�liborhood. •, � � � , HUMLIN RESOURCES CUMMISSZON DISCUSSION ON DARRF.T� FARR 11PPLICATION PAGE T4��0 Mr. Bel�urn asked how many families were presentl.y a part of the ' Innsbx�uck North Townhouse Association. P�Ir. Lukaszewski stated the association was comprised of 126 iamilies. � � , Ms. Lambert asked why one larger. association rather than several smaller ones couldn't be formed. Mr. Farr stated this �aould create all kinds of probJ_ems including problems wi�th the Home- owner's Association fee. The Innsbruck P1ort}i To�mhouse Association fee is presently $43.00 per month per family. The fee for the new association to be. formed will be a�proxima�te7_y $28 . OU per month per family. Mr. Belgum asked whether an association wilJ_ be formed. Mr. Far_i� sta-L-ed they will f_orm an association ��Jhich basically follows thc� guidelines set by fIUD. It will b� �atterned as closely as pos- sible with �the existing association. , Ms. Sheaasked how -the neighboring people feel about this develop- ment. I�1r. Farr stated he did not know, but this will not af:Fect their property. � � � � � , � ' ' P'!s . Shea asked �ahy an obj ec�tion was raised about the road being 31 fee-L wide. Ms. Lambert stated it is a winding mai.n street. Ms. Lamber_t added, however, that she lives on a 31 f.00t wide street and it was dif�icult at times, but that she would. not deny the plan for �this reason . Mr. Scott stated he would like to express his concerns on the maiter. He added he wa.s hat�irig a few pr.obl_ems accep-ting �this developmeni: for two reasons . (1) P°Zr . Scott s�Lated when he spoke of ghe-Ltoization, he meant economic sti�atifi_ca��ion. He stated he was opposed to that. He added he would like ta s�e a greater range in the kirids of housinb that are available. He stated he did not want to create som��t}�i_n; tr�at could be identified as the lowest economi_c group. (2) Mr. Sco�tt stated because he has been an occupant of townhouses and rental units for a long time, he has come -Lo discover witY� young chilclren as r.esidents, the immed- iate area would l�ecome run down. Ms. Shea stated a beautifu]_ recreational area caas across the street from fihis development. Ms. Lam}�ert addcd in one and two bedroom to�mhouses, there would not be much likelihood for. many_children. Ms. Scott stated he realized it would not be fair to ask Mr. Farr to redo this entire plan, He stated, however, �tha� Metro Council is looking at the type of� thin� he had mentioned. Mr. L�.ndstrom stated he felt Mr. Scott t�tas missa.I1�T the whole po�nt.�Iie stated the whole area is a totality. It was more socio=economically feasi.ble this way. , � ' � HUMf1N R�SOURCES COMMISSION DISCUSSION ON DARREL FARR APPLICATION , P�GE THR3�:E � Ms. Lynch stated she felt t}iis plan should be approved. ' MOTION by Plancy Lambert, seconded by Grace Lynch to recommend to Metr.o �'ounci_1 and the 1'lannlnj Com;nisston that the Human Resources Commissi�n i.s in �enei�a:�. a�r.eement with the plan and , does not see any �er.ious human resour.ces nroblems. Upon a voice vote, all votin� aye, the rno-tion carried unanirnously. � MOTIOPI by Iiarold Belgum, secondeci by Barbara Shea, to amend the above rnation to re<<d "witiz t?�e und�rstanding tliat an �-�ssociaiion is a part= oi the nlan." Upon a voice vote, al_]_ vo�in; aye, the , motiori carried urlan�i�riously. � ' ' '. ' � � � , , ' . ' . i '�I � � � ._ �, � � � MEMO T0: Planning Commission MEMO FROM: Jerrold L. Boardman, City Planner MEMO DATE: March 26, 1976 RE: Taxation Question on Townhouse Developments Attached please find graphs showing how tax dollars are dispersed in the different school districts. The mill rate is different for each school district. 1975 Mill Rate with Fiscal Disparities School District 11 School District 13 School District 14 School District 16 101.86 95.79 102.00 107.72 ' The North Innsbruck Townhouses are in School District #13� ' which incidentally has the lowest mill rate. As per the � graph, this mill rate is dispersecl in the following manner: � , ' � ' � 54.12 Mil]_s 22.22 Mills 14.88 MiZls 3.41 Mills .77 Mills .24 Mills .15 Mills 95.79 Mi11s go to the schools go to the County go to the City go to Metro Transit go to Metro Council go to Mosquito Control to to N.S.H.D. (56.50%) (23.20a) (15. 53 0) ( 3.56a) ( .800) ( .25%� ( .160) 100.000 This mill rate is applied to the assessed valuation of a property, not the estimated market value. Any questions on how the assessed valua��.on is arrived at should be directed to the City Assessor's office. The 14.88 rnills that go to the City accounts for 54.8% of the total General Fund Budget of the City. In 1975 this amounted to $1,619,966 out of total revenues of $2,954,850. The total budget for Public Works was $525,162 or 18.3% of the City General Fund Budget. This would equate to $296,453 in tax dollars or 2.65 mills or 2.80 of total taxes paid. This would mean, for example, if the real estates taxes were $700 on a property, 2.80 of. those taxes would be $19.80. This Public Works Budget does include the maintenance and snow plowing of North Innsbruck Drive and Matterhorn Drive, and other public streets that service this area. It also includes the costs of maintaining and repairing of fire and police equipment which service. the Innsbruck area. The City also runs water. and sewer lines to the property line of . the area. These Public Works maintenance items would reduce the 2.8� figure a little, so the amount of real estate taxes being paid by homeowners in a townhouse development far v�thich they feel they were not getting services for, was not a large amount. JLB/de � MILL RATE INCREASE FROM 1974 TO 1975 SCHOOL DISTRICT # 11-------------------�--- 9.7% SCHOOL DISTRICT # 13----------------------- 1.1% . SCHOOL DISTRICT # i4----------------------- g,6/ SCHOOL DISTRICT # 16------------------------16.9% ANOKR COUNTY------------------------------- 8.4% CITY OF FRIDLEY--________.._�_____.._________�q,,gg/ NORTN SUBURBRN FiOSPITAL DISTRICT-----------(-6%� f�ETFtOPOLITAN T�;NSIT C�MMISSION------------68.8% METROPO�.ITAN COUNCIL-------a--------------196% METROPOLITAN hiOSQUITO CONTROL-------------(No Change} RICE CREEK WATERSHED----------------------(-5/) . VO-TECH SCHOOL �#916 (DISTRICT #16 ONLY)---(New this Year) � , . SCHOOL DISTRICT �`11 . ,- • Metro Council ' .77 Mi11s .76% Metro Transit 3. 41 Mi 1 l s�.��` ' 3 . 35% ,.�J � C i tY , ;l Metro Mos. Cont. .24 Mills .23% N.S.H.D —.f5 Mills �.15% 14.88 Mill School �,{ ��. ,��— 14 . 61 % � i . � 60.19 Mills � County ��'� 59.09% � � 22.22 Mills � . 21.81% ' , .Y_..-- � , � SCHOOL DISTRICT �14 �. Metro Council—� .77 Mills � .75% Metro Transit 3.41 Mills 3.34% ' � , . C_� Metro Mos. Cont. .24 Mills .23 % N.S.I�.D. .15 Mills .15% � 14.88 Mil s !� School � 14.59% .j� '� 60.33 M�lls � 59.15% Count % ' � 22.22 Mills � 21.78/ • � �, �. `•. , ' �� �., �`� �.• , SCHOOL DISTRICT�;13 Metro Council Metro f�los. Cont. .77 Mills .24 Mills .80% .25� Metro Transit _ -N.S.H.D:15 Mills 3. Mil1sJ_:�i��'�� o 3.56/ „ .16/ , C i tY t �� i %� 14.88 Mil1 �� School 15.53% 54.12 Mills 56.50% _ Count 22.22 Mills 23.20% \ . SCHOOL DISTRICT �16 Metro Council h9etro Mos. Cont. .77 Mills M� s .71% .22% Metro Trans� t-- N. S. H. D. 3.41 Mills � .15 i�lills 3.17% .74% ' C i ty � 14.88 Mil s ; Schoal 13.81% � 63.66 Mills �_ � 59 .10% Count 22.22 Mi17s � 20. 63% *Vo-Tech #�916 2.39 Mills 2.22� *School District #16 only .A '� � SCHOOL DISTRICT ' � 11 13 ' 14 16 � � ' . 13 14 16 1974 1975 MILL RATE MILL RATE WITHOUT FISCAL DISPARITIES 90.96 . 102.50. 89.60 95.52 91.15 101.36 90.55 103.85 89 . 81 91.36 90.7G RICE CREEK WATER SHED INDIVIDU�IL GOVERNMENTAL t1fdITS ' 11 13 � 14 16 ' COUNTY � CITY N. S. H. D. ' METRO TRANSIT ' ��1ETR0 CQUNCIL MOSQ. CONTROL ' � R. GK. t�JATERSHED � VOC. SCH. #916 ' ' ' � ' 54.85 53.49 55.04 54.44 20.49 12.94 .16 2.02 .26 .24 .21 95.72 101.56 104.05 61.78 54.20 60.04 60.14 22.27 14.48 .15 3.41 .77 .24 .20 (*School District �16 only) 1975 MILL RATE � WITH FISCAL DISPARITIES TOl .86 95.79 102.00 107.72 95.99 102.20 107.92 6Q.19 54.72 60.33 63.66 22.22 14.88 .15 . 3.47 .77 .24 .20 *2.39 0 I, � d Pianninq C�mmission Meetinq - April 7, 1976 Pa,qe 1 ROUGH QRAFT OF PLANNING COt�iMISSION MEEI"ING I�_� TABLED: CONTIPlUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF R PRE- LIMTNARY PLAi', P.S. �76-02, INNSBRUCK VILLAGE, QY DARREL A. FARR DEVEL- OPME:�lT CORPOR�TI4�l: Being a r��plat of Outlot B, Innsbruck ��orth Addition, along with Lot ���, except the Westerly 210', Auditor's Subdivision No. � 92, generally located tVorth of North Innsbruck Drive N.E. and West of Black Forest Apartment. � TABLEQ: A CbPITINUATION OF R COP�SIDERFlI'ION �F A PROPOSED TOWNH�OUSE DEVELOPMENT OF ?QO UNITS, T#76-02, BY�DARRELWA FARR DEUELOPMENT� CORPORA- TION FOR INNSBRUCK VII.LAGE. � � PUBLIG NEARIN� CI.OSED.(Darrel Farr and Jir� l.ondon were present) MOTTOt� by L�rig�r�fe'E d, seconders by �iE�.:�., S thai the P1 anni ng Commi ssi ar► receiv� tt��� cxcer�t from �;h� ii�inutes ar� 'cE�e I�ur�an RESOUr-ces Commission meeting �f Hpri1 '1, ��"7E on �he d�liver�tior� ar� Uarrc1 Farr's ap}?lication for develo�i��`nt ot� Innsb�°uck �'il�?c?�o ei�ar� a vaice VO�P, all r�ot:iny ayes th2 motion carried unanimous�}a> � MOTIQiV �y Peterson, secr,nded b� Bergrr�an, that the Planning Commission � rEC�:ive the �ei�er wr�ii:f;er� b�f th� Darrc�l �� Far�r� �e��clopment: Cor��oration �v tFie �1 ann i ng �ornr��i ss i o;t r���;���Ers d�t�;i A�r i�?. , 197G. U�,on a vo i ce vote, a11 voting aye, thE r��uti�►� carr�ed unanimously. � � � !� Mr. Cl�ri� said h� had a pe�titior� that the City had received directed to the C7�� COl�C1C1 � S but a� i t cc�r��c�rr�cc� tri� d�vel c���ment of l i�nsbruck vil�age,. he thaught the Planning Ccmmissic�� should see it also. MQiI01� bv Lang�nfe1d, seconded by Peter�son, that the Planning Commission receive Patition ��--1976. Upon a vo�ce vo�.�, all voting aye, th� motion carried unanirnaus�y. Ghai r�rnar� Harri s read the peti t� or� : � "Peti ti c�rt the Fri di ey Ci ty Counc ��! �:G cor�d i ti on acc�}�t.a�7ce/appraval of propc�se� Prelimitiary P1at, P.S. #�76-Q2, Inr�sbruck Viilage Flddition, by Darrel �. Farr DevE�opment Corporation, being a replat of outlot B, Audi- tor"s Subd�ivisian �la. 92, all �ying in Section 2�+, T-30, R�29, City of � Fridiey, County of /�noka, Minnesota...includir�g the request to waive the Cit� Setback Crdinance from 35 to 0 feet. . � � We the undersigned: hereby petitian the �ridley City Councii to condition acceptance/approval of the above captioned project upon com�liance by the developer, Darrel A. �'�rr Deve1opment Carporation, with the fr�llowing restrictions: I. "iTiat the City of Fridley in consideration of its tax paying residents, t �establish standards of year-reund mainenance for the North Innsbruck Drive Extention (that section of black top road beginning at the alack Fores� Apartment, and running East to Silver Lake Road) shall file a � �� , � � � � � � � � � '. I' � ROUGH DRAFT OF PART OF PLANNIhdG CQMMISSION MEE7ING APRIL 7, 1976 Pa�e 2 suitable perfarmance bond with the City of Fridl�y, which shall be renewed annually, and shall be adequate to properly maintain said road through completion of construction activities in the Innsbruck North Additian." T.I. "That the City of Fridley disallow waiving the City Setback Ordinance in the above referenced area on grounds that it would be discrimina- tory; that it would create an unsafe condit�on due to a minimum of two blind spots on the proposed City maintained road connecting North In�sbruck Drive to Arthur Streeet; that due to the narrowness of this City mai��ained raud, and in viev� of assumc�� parallel parking on both sides of this road, it will prove to be a major hinderance to Fire and/ar Police emergency vehic7es access; ar�d as a result of garage/dwelling structures close appr�xima�ion to the road itseZf, �rove to seriously inhibit adequate ano�� plowing of road surfaces, short of truck removal frorr� �hE imme�i ate are� T:�t Ci ty expen�E.. " . TII."That the City obtain from the Darre� A. Farr Development Corporation an offic���l and acce�table urd�rstan�ing as to Quad-�To��rnhouse homeowners financial respar�sibilities for rnain�ainirEg all non-City maintained roads in the above referenced area, as well as the upkeep of townhous� exter- iors and commort gr�unds." Si ncer�l,�� F Concern�d Area f2esiaen�s, Ir�nsbruck NortF� addi�ion" Chairman liarr�is said �;i-�is petition was sig�ed by many names.. Mr. C1ark said the staff had a meeting with Darrel Farr after the date of the letter° wrytten by 1�r�. Farr to the Planning Commission, but prior to � us receiving ita There wer�e a couple of items that were verball'y agreed to that �vould change some of f.{�e comments in �,e pet.ition also Th first {�il,J �ai�,1�'�---.. �� ,�0� thing tha� was discussed was the width of �he street. He said the other streets in N�orth Innsbruck wer� 28' back to back. He said that Darrel Farr was proposing that West Bavarian Pass be built 31' wide. Mr. Bergman asked for clarification of the street width. Mr. Clark said that North Innsbruck Drive and Matterhorn Drive were built to state aid standards, but North Danube, South Danube, West Danube and East Danube are all 28' streets, and they are public streets. Mr. Clark said they recognized that there might be less residential parking on these streets than there would be on West Bavarian Pass. As a compomise we have agreed that 31' might be adec;uate provided no parking was allowed on one side of the � � ' �� � � i Rau�h Draft of Part of the Planning Commission Meeting April 7, 1976 Page 3 street., preferably on the inside, so you could see around the curves easier than if there were cars parked on this side of the street. He said the second item they discussed was the setbacks. He said that if the 31' strPet was approved there would be about a 10' boulevard, because it was a 50' right of way. We felt that the garages should be at least 5' off of the righ� of way so that we h�ve 15' for the.��orage of snow. This shou�d be fairly adeq�a�e even during peri�da of heavy �nowe this 5' was at the point of a sharp curve in the road. The exc�ption ta He said the ,�,�°�},�si�ht distance �� a residential �treet with 30 �oP.H. speed limit was Z00'. To get that 200' of sight distance, one garage would have to be located about 10' from the ►�igh� of way. Mr. Pete�son asked if Nir� Farr had agreed to this and if there was 1 room to move this garage in 1G`? Mr. Clark said this data was just ' � compiled by the Engineerinc� Departirer;t and thi�s was the first the developer was hearing of this. He said that Mr�. Farr did agree that what ever it took to get the 200' sight distance on a 30 M.P.N. residential sireet, that he would abide by that. Mr. Farr said �hat was correct. Mr. Clark said the third item discussed was the maintenance of the extension road of North Ir�nsb�R�ck Qrive to Silver Lake Road. Darrel Farr agreed to keep up the surface, patching it as necessary, the same as was done on any other residential street. He asked the City if we would plow it. We have said that we would but at the lump sum of $500 per year. Mr. � Clark said that should be more than adequate if we plow it when we plow �. � �� i our own streets, and sand it when we sand our own streets. Mrs. Wahlberg asked Mr. Clark what conversations there had been between the City of Fridley and �he City of New Brighton regarding that street. Mr. C7�rk said that North Innbruck Drive will be connected to Silver Lake Road but not at the present alignment. This was definitely a temporary situation. � ' , Rough Draft of Part of the Planning Commission Meetinq April 7, 1976 Pa� 4 � Ne said that New Brighton has no�plans -for when this road will conne ct, but � � � we do know that it will be a Staie aid street.. A lot will depend upon the development of the land in New Brighton. He said if someone came in and purchased this land, this road could be completed as soon as next year, or it could be ten years. Mrs. Wahlberg said the reasan she asked the question was because she wondered if some agreement couldn't be worked aut with New Brighton tha� they would pay Fridley something for maintaining and plowing this street as New Br�ghtar� was receiving th� 1:axes on the property adjacent to this road, t�Ir. Clark said he didn't think they would go along wi�h anythir�g like this because NE��v Br�igh�on could care less if the road was there.� It was not a road that vras nece�sary to New Br�i ghtari. Zt was a roaci used by the resider�ts of Fridley. Mr. Clark said that was far as the maintenance o� this extensiorr, when the development fin�shes the constructior of the last townhouse, the maintenance of this raad will revert to the City of Fridley; because we own the easement for this road. Mr. Pe�erson said this easement was 66' and he didn't think that a 26' stre�t would serve this area for 10 years. Mr. Clark said the width was �dequate for what it was being used for. Mr. Clark said the problems tha� have occurred with this road in the winter time was because of the way it <<:as plowed. It was probably only plowed to about 16 to 18 feet. He said that when the City plows this street to the full width, this should eliminate a lot of the problems mentioned at other meetings on this development. He said that 26' wide was two 13' driving lanes, and that was.adequate when there was no reason for anyone to park on tihis street. Mr. Bergman said it was brought out at the Public Nearing that there were many peop]e who walked this road to catch the bus at Silver Lake Road, and he didn't think it was wide enough to handle both automobile and pedestrian traffic. �� � a ' ' . � � r ' � � ' � � . � � Rou,qh Draft of Part of the Planninq Commission Meeting - April 7, 1976� Paqe 5 Mrs. Shea asked why Mr. Farr was the only developer in the area that had to maintain that extension road. Mr. Clark said because he was the petitioner for the rezoning of this property, and the City wanted this road so that it would be used during the constructian of the townhouses and provide another acces`� ',e homeowners in this area. It seems like this road was more conveniert,� I. 694. He said that if this road had only been used f�r autamobile traffics it wouldn't have broken up as it has. He said that if this was a public road, it would have been posted duri�g thc� spring, but as thi� was about a 7 to-n street, and the construction vehicles usir�g this extensiar� �rere probably 9 ton, was �he reason why �his road had broken up . � Mr. Peterson said triat after sitting �nd listening to peop1� firam this area complaining about this road un�il all hours of the night, he felt that something would have to be don� about it, but he didn't feel that this was completely the prablem of the Farr Corporation. He felt the Gity was going to continue to have problems and complaints on this road. Mr. Clark said that if Darrel Farr wasn't involved in this street at all, and it was the sole responsibility of the City, because this was only a temporary location of the r�oad he couldn't see spending tax dollars to upgrade this road to a wider width. He said that when the City plowed this street, they could probably put the wing down and p�ow the boulevard far this street so people;could �valk along the side of the road. Mr. Bergman said he had a problem with this because no one could put a time frame on when this road would be permanently constructed in New arighton. Mr. Harris asked if NEW Brighton would take over the connector road when it was constructed in Netiv Brighton, or would .FridTey still have an obligati�oo. Mr. Clark said that the road in New Brighton would be a state aid road when it was constructed and there wasn't a tax burden on � �,• ' Re��b 9wa�� e� Part of the Planning Commission Meeting Apri1 7, 1976 Page 6_ maintaining a state aid road, so there was no reason for Fridley to have ' � an obligation in New Brighton, when this road �a�cs. permanently located. Mr. Harris said the Planning Commission was concerned because in the memo from Jerry Boardman to Dick Sobiech that they had received, it was stated that the City had no responsiblity for this extension, but it was �Xl�����C also brought out at these meetings that the contract between Darrel Farr and the City had expired, so it seemed no one was responsible for this raad. Mr�. Clark said the inte;�t of the agreement was that 1;he develop�r would maintain this �°oad un�:il construction was completed, and then the City of Fridley would take over this road until the permanent alignment of this road was constructed ir� New Brighton. He said the extension af this agreement during construct�iarr shoul� be part of the plat approval, and Mr. Farr agrees to this, if the City will plow the road. Mr. Peterson said that he felt that the problem stili hadn't been so1ved with this stre�te It was so constructed that �at2� stood i►� the street, and it was not wide enough to provide for either pedestrian or bike traffic. Mr. Clark said the solution was that the City widen the street and insta�l "sidewalks. In order to da that, the City has to get mon�y from � some place, so� � would hold a Public Hearing on the �provement. He would venture to say that the r�esidentsof Fr d y� ��-t want that improvement made, when thzy had to pay for it. Mr. Harris said he didn't �� know who the City could_assess_ �t,�o,� �i�no�;o�e this road. Mr. Clark said then � ;�,��,.^4-�, ��t.. iL'a;,�u,�,� :'":`.�.�, �" the City Council v�,��9 to order that road improved. .. . Mr. Bergman asked if the City had a set of specifications for curb to curb street width standards? Mr. Clark said they were many width streets I'� � ������-.#�er the City. Ne said it may not sound logical, but there was logic behind each street width. He said that on residential streets 1 _ . _ -� ' ' � Rouc�h Draft of Part of the Planninq Commissi�on Meeting of April 7, 1976 Page 7 that were side stre�ts where there were no home facing that street, ihe norma1 standard was 31'. He said that residential streets such as North Innsbruck and Riverview Terrace were 36' wide, these were streets that had housing facing that street. He said that most collector streets were 40' to 44' unless it carried a heavy traffic load, and then they could be as wide as 50`. He said tha �service drives where �t�ere was no parking � �� t�d be �', where we �av� 3Q' right of ways, but in industrial parks these can be as wide as 36` now. Mr. Peterson said then the extension of ' North Innsbruck DRive ��s�classified as a service drive. Mr. Clark said 1� . there was ano�hPr �� such as on Nor�h .D�t�ub� and South Danube.. , � �• , � �� � r where the street was concrete the fu11 width, and that was 28'. Mr. Petcrson said that he w�s sympathetic ta the Darrel A. Farr CorpQration because he felt they had tried ta coaper�ate with the City and they seeme� to havE dev�lo�ed a gaod rapport with the Staff in terms of their willingness to campromise, but he felt badly because we were not solving the problems af the citizens of Fridley who have been to these hearings complaining about the road extension. Mr. Harris said that rathe�° than widening out this extension street, he wondered if it would be possible to grade a strip 6 to 8 feet wide alony side of the road that could serve as a walkway. He asked Mr. London what"kind of soil was in this area. h1r. London said it was clay. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Farr if it would be possible to have his bulldozing equipment grade a 7' strip along this road. Mr. Farr said he would be willing to do this. Mr. Claxk sa�l that i� the Cit� .,bad any extra wood chips available, they r .�",. �.. �y-;s��'� �'��'' �R-^,�,�„ �_.'�.usrw � ���� � �,.�� on this walkway, so it wouldn t be so muddy, but he couldn't make any committment on that. Mr. Harris said that if the C.ity plowed this area in the winter time, it would provide a walkway in the winter also. f, ' ' f , � "�u �h �;a-`i �F "art of Part of the Planninq Commission Meeting of April 7, 1976 Page 8_ Mr. Peterson said that if the City will plow the street to the full width and if a walkway of some type was put in along the road for pedestrians, he felt this was as far as they could go at this time of solving the problems with this road. � MOTION by 4Jahlberg, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission take the consideration of a preliminary plat, P.S. �76-02, Innsbruck Village, and the consideration'or a 100 unit townhouse development T#76-02, for Innsbruck Village, by th� Darre� R. Farr Develapmerrt Corpot°ation from the , table. Upon a vaice votes all vating aye, the motion carried unanimously. ' , , , I , ` ---- � . Mr. Bergman said that it seemed to him that Dar�rel Farr was doing his job, but it seemed the City of Fridley was remiss in puttino forth any effurt for the residents c�f �hP City. Mr. Harris said �hat pr�bab1y in a moral sense that Fxidley shou.ld be putting in the walkway, but to be realistic, he didn't thihk Frictley had the kind of equipm�nt that would be needed for such a job, and there might be complaints if Fridley equipment was seen workin� in New Brigh�ton. He said that with the equipmer�t that Mr. Farr had, this job could probably be done in six hours, and it would take much longer for the City to get it done, and would cost a 1ot more money. Mr. Bergman said hi.s concern was more for wha paid for this rather than who did the job. Mr. Farr said he thought that Mr. Narris's suggestion was a good one and he agreed with it. He said that he agreed that the City should do it, but they won't, so he would do it. Mr. Harris said he really appreciated that. Mr. Bergman said there was a wash area in this road that shou7d be handled. Mr. Harris asked h1r. Clark if there wasn't an old culvert around , that•hir. Farr could use. He said he thought the City should cooperate with Mr. Farr also. h1r. Clark said that probably wouldn't be any problem. � e PLA�dNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 7,]976 (ROUGH DRAFT) Page 9 Mr. Peterson said that in the last meeting the staff had with Mr. Farr that they were in basic agreement on the plat as presented excep�t for► the parking on the street, and the cha�ges in the 0' setbacks. Mr. Narris said that he would rather see a 36' wide street so � parking could be on both sides of the street. Mr. Clark said this townhouse plan was a little di-Fferent that the other townhouse plans in tha1: there could be parking in the driveway to the garage. He said that if the street was wide�red there would be��less room for snow storage, and mor�e snow to put there. Mr. Harris said he thought parking on one side of t;he street could be the cause of neigh�onc�od friction. h1r•e Clar•k said fihat if the road was posted for no parking befiare the townhouses were sold people would know that this was �he �ay it wa� going ta be and there wauld be a townhouse associa��on to se��le any neic�h�orhood problems. Mr. Narri s asked hor�t many uni ts woul d be next ta thi s street. Mr�. Clartc said 60 units. They would have one car garages with space in the driveway to park one car, so there was off street parking for two cars for each unit. He said that �hese were one and two bedroom unitsy designed to attract the retired couples and young marrieds so they felt that most people would have only one or two cars. These weren't designed for large family units. He said that Mr. Farr has tried to have housing in all price ranges. He said that if there were wider streets and two car garages in this townhouse development, then the costs would be much higher. He said that to provide housing in this price range, there wouldn't be all of the amenities �hat you would get in higher cost housing. Mr. Bergman said they weren't talking about two car garages, they were talking about an extra 5' of street width. Mr. Clark said that would add to the cost of the construction of these townhouses. Mr. London said it would cost $3500 - to widen this street. He said that in the Vienna Townhouses � th�re were one car garages with no parking in the garage area, and when-��r� � � ' �� � , � ' � � , ' ' , , , �� � Plannin� Commission Meeting of April 7, 1976 (ROUGH DRAFT)_ Page 10 buy these units they know what they were buying. Ne said they may have lost some sales on these townhouses because of this, but any problems �he people had were handled internally by the townhouse a�sociation.. He said that he was not in favor of a wider street. He would rather see more green area. Mr. Clark said that if the Planning Commission felt strongly that they would like a 36' street in this plat, then that was what their recommendati�n should be to the CQUncils �nd let �he Council decid� hovr they wanted it. Mr. Langenfcld said that he had never seen a group of busi��ss people such as the Farr Development Corporation wh� �rere sa accommodating ta the City, but he though� that all th� problem� on t�is �tres� should be settled so they don't have another problem like the North Innsbruck Drive extension. Mrs. Shea and P�rs. Wahlb��g said that they lived on a 30' street, and there has nev�� beer� any problems with parking or the movement of traffic. Mr. Peterson said that hE felt that the extra 5' af green area that they would have with a 31' stree� was very impartant. Mr. Langenfeld asked what width street was originally proposed for this p1at. Mr. London said 24'. Mr. Langenfeld said that he thought 31` was already a compromise, so he was agre�able to the 31'. MO`FIaN by Reter�son, secc►nd�� by Langer�feld, ti-�at th� Pl�nnina Comxnissic�n recommend �o Council approvz.l o� a preliminary plat�s P•S• �76-02, InnshrucF. Village, and approval of a proposed -Cownhouse developmer�t of 100 uiii�s, 't'-� 76-02, fQr In��sbruck Villaye, by Darr�l A. Farr Deve1opment Carpora�i�n, being a replat of Outlot B, �nnsbruck Nor�h Acldition: alang W1tIl Loi: 49, except the ���esterly 210k'D id�tNr�s ana�W�s+�of the Blacke�orest Aparl:ment, North of North Innsbruc . with thE following stipulatio,�s: i. 2. Pl.a.rr specifications for str�et,s and ut.i1ities ar� to be subnii�tt.ed to the City for appruval. Developer deed ta the City, Innsbruck�Pdortri'Park, before any plat appruval or building perm�ts are issue�. � ', . . ' ' ' , � 1. ' , , � , ' �. 1 ' . Planninc�Commission Meetinq of April 7, 1976 (ROUGH DRAFT) Page 11 • , 3. The par� of Lat 49, except the tdester�y 2i0', Auditor's Subdivisiort No. 92,.that. wasn't part of the plat, be dedicated to �he City, as this was adjacent to Innsbruck North Park. � 4. Two tennis courts wi11 be built by the developer on public park property, the location to b� decided by the Ciiy, with the compleiion of 20 townhouses in Innsbru�k Vi11ag�. -_ 5. Road d�sigri on laes� �avari�n Pass mus� meet Ciiy approval� b; West Bavarian Pass shall b� 31' wide, with r►o Pzrking �xl7owed on the W�stern curb of this stree�. 7. The minimum setback for �n�� gara.o� on 1�e�i [�����r�iar� Pass si�all b� 5�Fee�, witf� one garage beinq appr�c=x�mately iU feet from the property �ine so that 20�`, sigh� distarice fro�n the cur�b is main� tained on th� curbe ' 8. The dev�lop�r wi11 maintain the extQnsion af North Innsbruck Driv� from ihe City o� Friciley line ta Silver Lake Road until the last � to�nho�s� is compl��e�e 7his extensior► wi11 t�e Rlow�d by the City of Fri dl ey f�ir a fe� of $5Gt� a year $ to b� pai d bS� f:t�e de�s�laper�.. 9.� 7k�e developer wijl buli�oze a 7' strip alang the extension raad to be used as a��alkway� Mr. Bergman said he questioned the setb�cks for this p7at. Mr. Clark said that the reason they weren't fol.lowing the 35' setback was because it would push the units back so far that there wouldn't be any open area. Mr. Bergman said �he problem he had was that the City of Fridley had set up certain standards and one of those standards was that structures be 35' from the property line. He said that he didn't understand X�X�XR�X that if a 35` setback was deened go�d in all residential districts why this wasn'�t good for a townhouse development. Mr. Peterson said that he was sure that the houses on Rice Creek Boulevard where he lived, were not 35' from the property line, and he assumed that this was done to preserve the integret.ity of the d���� back yard which ��r���X���4� to the Creek. He said that in lookin t�-� was next �.�- �jz: � this townhouse plan, he personally felt that the open space, t��� � at /� �,�.� t. }r;,�. :c� `� �, : � �� �� 4 -.j. ��,= ,�.�� .- �.� ��,�. tk�e.,�-h�,�.�-.a�-�.errt}p�ec�-�Q-�u�-�n�o-�, and the integrity of the na,�,ural landscape and the trees, was more important than a 35' setback, because he didn't see ' setback. He said that this setback requirement � � � � Plannin Commission Meeting of April 7, 1976(ROUGH DRAFT) Page 12 sometimes resulted in land waste, and as Will Rogers used to say, they aren't making any more of it. He said that the way this plat was being developed was good sound planni.ng. Mr. Clark said that the difference in a residential development and a townhouse deve7opment was that there were no setback requirements in the �ownhouse ordinance. He said the only reason the setback requirements applied to part of this plat was because there was going to be a public street to meet the F.H.A. requirements. If this was a private street, the 35' setbac!� would not apply�. Mr. Rergman said he didn't think it was right not to have setback requirments for townhouses. Mr. G'fark said then the. code would have to be changed. Mre LangEnfel� sai� that in Sectjon 205�051 of �he Code it s�ates"Fo� other uses, other than dwel1ing units, permitted uses and uses require:i�g a special use permit, requirem�r�ts as to lotss setbacks, buildin�ss parking, landscaping screening, and exte�ior materials shall be at least co�parable to simi�ar uses in other dist�icts, but also subject to additional provisions as provided by the City." He thought the Planning Commission would be the one to establish the additional provislons and therefore we can eliminate the 35' setback. Mr. Harris said that he felt that the proposal tears u-p less landscape than if it ha� to have a 35' setback. He said that i� this dev�lopment was held to a 35' setback it would jus� destroy the natural characteristics of ihe area.. He said that in his travels through the townhouse areas that have already been completed that the Farr Corporation has done an excellen� job. He said they have done an excellent job of fitting the structures into the landscape. He said the proposed plan was the best way to fit the units into the existing.landscape without tearing up everything. He said he did not favor a 0' setback on a public street because if a small error was made, a structure cou7d encroach in the public right of way, but with a 5' setback � � . �� � , Plannin4 Commission Meetinq of April 7, 1976 (ROUGH DRAFT) Page 13 this shouldn't happen. XXXXC4i�XXl9�iFl���X��X�X}��X�4����XX�K�X��XdS�}f�X�di�X�����d6�i��X��X��X Mr. Harris said that at this time he would like to make a statement , to the City Administration, before we vote. As we are allowing a 31' street in this development he felt it was incumbent upon the City Eng9neering '' Department to treat evErybody else in town equally as fair, and it was not necessary, t�ew�efore, that ever.y frontage stre�t be 36' wide in the I� � rest of the City. Mr. Clark said ther°e was a street being built this year that wouldn't be 36' rrfide. Mr. Harris said he objected to that ' because he felt i� was arbitrary. Mro Clark said that as he said before; � ' � � it might not be logical, but ther� was logic behind these decisions. He said this was in the Leif Henrikson plat ofif of East River Road. There just isn't enoush room to provide for 50' right nf way and a 36' stree�. Mr. Harris said that if they were going to pave Riverview Terrace and it was 36' wide, he would have to pay for that. Mr. Clark said not necessarily because there was a Public Hearing before any impravement was ordered in. He felt that if an entire block saia they did not want a 36' street, it would not be or°dered in. Mr. Harris said that in the tten year street plan, which must be almost completed, he felt that the attitude was to take it the way it was proposed, regardless. He said he �, felt�th� City, the staff and the Engineening Gepartment had been arbitrary, in the meting out of street widths, and assessments and he felt it had been unfairly administered and he thought he could find 30,000 people who would agree with him. UP4N A VOIGE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. i � CITY OF FRIDLEY PU6LIC IiEARIfdG QEFORE THE CITY COUyCIL TO I�HOM IT f�AY CO�dCERN : Notice is hereby given that t��e Council of the City of Fridley will i�old a public hearing at the Fri dley Ci ty Hal 1, 6431 Uni versi ty Avenue i�ortneast on Mon day , Ap ri 1 12 , 19 76 at 7: 30 p. m. on �t�e question of issuing an On-Sale Liquor License to John G. Purmort for the property 1 ocated at 3298 University Avenue (Southwest corner of University Avenue and 83rd Avenue). Anyone having an inte rest in the matte r snould make ihei r interest knovan at thi s publi c iieari ng. i•1ARVIN C. BRUNSELL � � CITY CLERK Publ i sh : P�arcii 31 , 1976 Apri 1 7, 1976 � r• � ., .. . � ' ' , Do ^lot'�lrite �n This Space /Ippl i cai:i on No. Qate Received by . / 5A ' APPLICATIO('d FO�R IN7UXICATI„G L.TQUOR L1CCfQSL � TO THE HOf�UR/t6LE CITY COUidCIL, �� ' ' '. 0 GE{dTLEFiLi� : _ : T, Pn'��c�% ".�1i� �. , as ��J"'I-"/���` _ ��--- - �fdame of person mai<iny ap��licat`�on Indivicival ot•r►ier, �rficer, �r par4ner for and � i� beh� , f of c'_�s F _« _�_____� �,;�.�� �S� �? _ - - ' �/ ___ ` �' m��sel�f=, names oF ��ar�cn�rs, name af c:arpor«�:1011 or associationf her�by subr�i t i n dup] � cate ti�i s a��pl � r.a;;i cn for a rr ���, _. (Jn Sale or Sp4c�a1. Club � Ini;oxi cati r�g Li quor Li cense for tf�� �� ,�' ,�,�,,�d_s ^_____�� �located at t ar>>� of res�;aurant, hoie] , ar club� � I � _ �� /j ��Rcf _1.��,,���r.s��y ��/�'�'. ,�i%� fo�~ fi.he sa1c ofi intoxicatinc� liquor in � Street dd��•�ss a,id/oi° pl ai: and parc�l nu�nb�r) ' , � • accordai�ce �-ri th t��� provi si ons o�' h1i nnc,c �a. Staiu �es , Chapi�r 340, and the Ci ty of ,�`'%/� �^ � �t /S � Fridle�� Or�iti�ance iyo. �35, comme�lciiig ��;=;�. _ C-�-��' 19 7� anci ending , .' � ,g 6 0 ln Sup7ort of sai d appl i cati on and � r, accordance w� tl� Lhe ��equi rernents as set . �orth in said Ordinancc, tilCi�e is ai;i:ached h�et�eto, in duplicat�; ific Pati�t I- Ge������ul Infarmut;on fai�m, Pai�t II - Pet,sot�«1 Inforin�tion fo��ms, the Q��:d, license fee, and invesi:igaiien fee. - , . � - 1 � _, -\ � ;:9Z��• . . -. _�_.._. � � �:�_____t_.�__ _ -' � �i �»ai��t���of Person n;aF:l ri� ,'��,pl �i ca1;i oi� � f O1' �!l`t C �.c. Cr � �c —� �C _ _ ' I..:,....._. . ' ��t•ty���lf, n�iui��s of ��artiicrs, n��mes of Curput�at�ion or a�50Clclt'tGtl� ' ' � PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CI�ARTER CHANGES (OFFICIAL NOTICE) CITY OF FRIDLEY 0 'There will be a public hearing before t,ie City Counci 1 at 7:30 p.m. on Apri 1 12, 1976 to consider the following changes in the Charter of the City of Fridley. Language that is proposed to be added to tl�e Charter is shown as follows: CI� , ' ' , � ' � �� ' � , , PJew Charter 1 anguage Language that is proposed to be deleted from the Charter is shown as follows: Be�e�e�-6ba��e�-�ap��a�e The changes are as fol lovds : Section 5.02, EXPENDITURES BY PETITIONERS. p�o n�ember of any initiative, referendum, or recal l commi ttee , no ci rcul ator of a si gnature paper, and no si gner of any such paper, or any other person, shall accept or offer any reward, pecuniary or otherwise, for such servi ce rendered i n connecti on wi tl� t��e ci rcul ati on tnereof, but thi s shal l not prevent the committee from paying for legal advice and from incurring a� exaense not to exceed �SA.-ae �200.00 for stationery, copying, printing, and notaries' fees. A sworn staterr�nt substantiatin� such expenses shall be turned ov�r to ti�e city clerk within 5 days followin� the filing of a�etition� Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor. Any violatio�� of this section shall be reported by the city clerk to the proper authorities for prosecution u��ider state statutes applyin� thereto. Section 5.03, FURTHER REGULATIO�S. A lawful petition under this Charter may be certi fi ed , si gned and ci rcul ated upon an ordi nance to be i ni ti ated, an � ��;a; ���,�ce tc� e ma e t� e su �ect o a referen um and a proceed�ng for Reca upon t��e groun s aut or� zed by 1 a�-� and requi red by the Cons-ci �uti on of the State of Minnesota and reasons stated in t��e certificate, all to be stated and nated in the petition itself. A petition for any other puroose may be made �n accordance v�ith procedures establis�ed by this Charter or under provisions of law as may be elsewhere provided. A peti ti on under thi s Cha�,ter shal l be fi led i n the offi ce of the ci ty clerk as one instrument, which instrument shall contain any instrun� nt re uired, a copy of any or inance propose , covered or affectc�d, any ot�er document appropriate to tne petition an�%�a^T'f t�ie� s� gnature papers and affi davi ts attached in support of the same. A peti ti on may e si gne y any ei,�c�tcr. A pet� tion can e ci rcu ated and veri fied only by an e ector w o has si gned the same. /�l 1 the si gnatures or� any eti tion need not be on one s�gnature paper. The circulator of every pa e—r sFia 1 verify by affidavit attacned that e s e was the ci rcul ator of the same , that eac{� si gnature was made i n hi s her oresence, is genuine, and of the erson that saine ur orts to be and that each si ner aff� i rrne�—t at e she was an e ector at t e resi dence stated thereon. Any paper 1 acki n� such affidavit or verified by an afficlavit false and untrue is insuffic�ent and vo�d of effec�. C1eW 2�C1�1Ot1 t0Y' til° same 111" 05e, nor 511d l 1 1L C'e'�ef1L Lile I;UUII�i i i ruin f C ICI [ ��i ai� or inance proposed to t e electorate at the next regu ar or special election, or otherwise actin g favorably upon the same. � ' PUaLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CH/�RTER CHANGES (COfJTINUED) , ' The Counci 1 may provi de by ordinance such further regul ations for the ini ti ati ve, referendum, and recall, not inconsistent with this Charter as it deems necessary. : '� � , ' s'a The city clerk, upon receipt of documented information that any siqnature on any petition paper has been falsely attested to, shall promptly forward such information to the_proper authority for prosecution under state statutes applying thereto. Section 5,05, F0�°; OF PETITION AND OF SIGNATURE PAPEFtS. The petition for the adoption of any ordinance shall consist of the ordinance, together with all ti�e signature papers and affidavits thereto attached. Such oetition shall not be complete unless signed by a number of voters equal to at least ten percent of the total number of registered voters as Junary lst of that y°ar. A��-��e-s}��a�a�es-�eed-�8�-�e-e�-e�e-s}�pa���e �a�e�;-�a�-�be-e}�ea�a�e�-e�-ede�,�-saeW-�a�e�-sba��-�al�e-a�-a����a�}�-�i�a�-eaEb-s���a�a�e a��e��e�-�e-�be-�arye�-}s-�be-�e�a��e-s}�pa���e-8�-�be-�e�sep-wAese-pa�e-��-����e��s-�e �e: Each signature paper shall be in substantially the following form: INITIATIVE PETITION Proposing an ordinance to . . . . . . . . . . . . . (stating the purpose of the 'ardinance), a copy of which ordinance is hereto attached. This ordinance is sponsored by the fol l owi ng corrmi ttee of electors : ' ' N ame 1 ................ 2. ................ 3. .......... ..... 4. ................ 5. ................ Address The undersigned electors, understanding the terms and the nature of th� ordinance hereto attached, petition the council for its adoption, or, in lieu thereof, for its submission ta the electors for thei r approval . Name 1. ................ 2. . .............. 3. ................ Address ................ At the end of the list of signatures shall be appended the affidavit of the circulator mentioned above. Section 5.06, FILIN6 OF PETITIONS AND ACTION THEREO�J. Fl��-�be-s}��a�a�e-�a�e�s-s�a}} �e-�}�e�-}p-�be-e��}ee-e�-�be-E}��+-E�e�l�-as-epe-}ps����e��.- Within five days after the filing of the petition, the city clerk shall ascertain by examination the number of electors whose signatures are appended thereto and whether this number is at least ten percent of the total number of regular voters. If he finds the petition insufficient or irregular, he shall at once natify one or more af the committee of sponsors of that fact, certifying the reasons for his finding. The committee shall then be given 3� days in which to file additional signature papers and to correct the petition in all other particulars. If at the end of that period the petition is found to bz still insufficient or irregular, the clerk shall file it in his office and s�1a11 notify each member of the correnittee to that fact. �be-�}�a�-�}H��+��-e�-��e-��s��€�E}epEy-e�- �x�eg��a�}�y-e�-a-qe�k���eq--sba��-qe�-�re���}Ee-�be-�}}}pg-e�-a-�ew-�e�}�}e�-€a�-�be-sa�e- ����ese3-�8�-sba��-}�-�pevep�-�Ne-Eed�E#�-��er�-�e�e��}��-�be-e��}pa�Ee-�e-�be-e�ee�e�s a�-�be-�e�c�-�eQb�a�-e�=-a�y-s�ee�a�-e�es�}eq-at-�ts_optioq. _2_ r � IPUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CNARTER CHANGES (COfdTINUED) ` GB�� . ,Section 5.08, INITIATIVE BALLOTS. The ballots used when voting upon such proposed ordinance snal l state the substance of ti�e ordinance and shall gi ve the voters the opportunity to vote either "yes" or "no" on the question of adoption. If a majority of the electors voting on any such ordinance vate in favor of it, it shall thereupon 'become an ordinance of the city. Any numbe r of proposed ordinances may be voted upon at the same election but the voter si�all be allowed to vote for or against each separately. ��-ease-e�€-}�ee�s�s�e�ey-�e��ree�-�ade-}���}a�ed-e�d}pa�ees-a���eved-a� 'e�e-e�ee�}e�;-�be-epe-a���e�ed-�y-�be-b}��e�-�e�eep�a�e-e�-e�ee�e�s-ae�}��-ep-�Ne �ae��}e�-sba��-��e�a��-�8-��e-e�c�e��-e�-��e-}�eeps�s�e�ey. In the case of inconsistency between two or more initiative ordinances a proved by the electors, the ordinances 's all not go into effect unti t�e c�ty counci as a 60 days to resolve t e lnconslstenc�es. Section 5.13, THE RECALL. Any five electors may form themselves into a committee 'for the purpose of bringing about the recall of ary elected officer of the city in accordance with p ro cedures established in Section 5.03. The committee shall certify to the ci ty clerk the name of the offi cer whose removal i s sougl�t , a statement of the �grounds for removal in not more than 250 words, and their intention to bring about his recall. A copy of this certificate shall be attached to each signature paper and no signature paper shall be put into circulation previous to such certification. � ' �J , �� Section 5.14, RECAL.L PETITIONS. The petition for the recall of any official shall consi st of a certi fi cate i denti cal wi th that fi 1 ed wi th the ci ty clerk together wi th all the signature papers and affidavits thereto attached. A��-�be-s���a���es-�ee�-�e� �e-e�-e�e-s}��a�awe-�a�ew;-���-�be-e}�Ea�a�e�-e�-e�e�y-�a�e�-sMa��-�al�e-a�-a�€�dav�� �ba�-eaeb-s��pa���e-a��e�de�-�e-�be-�a�e�-�s-�be-�e��}�e-s��Na���e-e�-�be-�e�sep-wbese �ar�e-}�-�a��s��s-�e-�e. Each signature paper shall be in substantially the following form; RECALL PETITION Proposing the recal of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . from his office as . . . . . . . . . ... . which recall is sought for the reasons set forth in the attached certificate. This movement is sponsored by the following cammittee of electors: N ame ' }� ,.....�.�.�.�... 2. . . . . 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 4. . . . . � . � . � . � . � . � . 5. . . . . . . . � � I , � Address ................ ................ ................ The undersigned electors, understanding the nature of the charges against the officer herein sought to be recalled, desire the holding of a recall election for that purpose. �3— � 6C. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CI�ARTER CNANGES (CONTINUED) Name Address 1. ............... ................ 2. ................ � ................ 3. ................ ................ At the end of the list of signatures shall be appended the affidavit of the circulator. Section 5.19, INSTRUCTIONS TO PETITIONERS. The city clerk siiall provide to every person ci rcul a ti nq a peti ti on for the i ni ti ati on of an ordi nance , t��e i ni ti ati on of charter amendm�nts , for a referendum, or the recal 1 of an el ected offi cial , written instructions delineating the correct and proper procedure for circulating the petition. The instructions rovided �vi11 clearl,� define falsification of a si�nature and false attestati on of a si gnature and wi l l ci te t��ose ordi nances , l a�,�s , or statutes rel ating to such acts. Section 6.04, SUQORDINATE O�FICERS. There shall be a city clerk, city treasurer, city aitorney, and such otl�er officers subordinate to the city manager as the council may provide for by ordinances, �be-�}�,�-a��e��e�+-s�a��-�e-a��e���ed-�y-�pe-Eea�e}}, . The ci'ty attorney and/ or leqal officer(s) shall be appointed b_ t�ity manager with approval of th� council. Th� city clerk shall be subject to the direction of the c�ty manager and shall have such duties in connection with tne keeping of the public records, the custody, and disbursement of the public funds, and the general administration of the city's affairs as s�all be ordained by the council. He may be designa�ed to act as secretary of the counci 1. The counci 1 may by ordi nance abol i sh offi cers whi cr� �ave been created by ordinance and it may combine the duties of various offices as it may see fit. . Secti on 6.05, PURCHASES 1�ND CONTRACTS. The city manager shall be the chief purci�asi ng agent of the city. All purchases on behalf of the city sha11 be made, and all contracts let, by the city manager, provided that the approval of the council rnust b4 givei�� in advance w!�enever ti�e anou��t of such purcnase or contract exceeds ��•g88ty.a8C7 �Cle amour�t stated in th� state statutes. All contracts, bonds, and instruments of every kind to whi ch the ci ty shal l be a party shal 1 be si gned f�y tne mayor on behalf of the ci ty, as well as by tne city manager, and shall be zxecuted in the name of tiie city. Section 6.06, CONTRACTS, H04J LET. In all cases of contracts for the purchase of merchandise, materials or equipment or for any kind of construction work undertaken by the ci ty, whi ch requi re an exnendi ture of mare than �� ;999:88 that whi ch i s set by the state statutes, unless the council shall by an emergency ordinance othe nvise provide, the city manager shall advertise for bids by at least �5 10 days published notice in the official newspaper. Sep��as�s-a��-���=ENases-}�-e�eess-e�-��;889-sba}} �e-�n-�-�e-�f�e-�a�es�-�=es�e;�s}��e-�}��e�-as�-�e�e��}�e�-�y-��e-Ee��E}�. When a bi d i s required, it shall be let to the lowest res�onsible bidder as determined by tne council, The cauncil may, how�ver, reject any and all bids. Nothing contained in this section shall prevent the council from contracting for the doing of u��ork with patented processes, or from the purchasing of patented appliances. �Section 7.04, PREPARAI'ION OF ANNUAL BUDGET. The city manage r shall �repare the estimates for the annual budget which shall include any estimated deficit for the current year. The estimates of exoenditures s{�all be submitted by each d�partment to tne city manager. ' Each estimate shall be divided into three major subdivisons as follows: (a) Salaries and '�lages, (b) Ordinary Expenses, (c) Canital Outlay. Salary detail shall show a list of all salaried officers and positions with salary allowance and number of persons holding , each, lJages shall be broken down in sufficient detail to justify the request. Ordinary 4^ � . � ' PUBLIC NEARING ON PROPOSED CHARTER CHANGES (CONTINUED) ,,, 6 �. � � expenses shall be broken down into such detail as the city manager shall direct. Capital 0utlay shall be itemized as to items and amounts. ��'In parallel columns shall be added the amounts expended under similar heads for the two preceding fiscal years, and, as far as practicable, the amounts expended and estimated for expenditure during the current year. In addition to estimates of �expenditures, the city manager shall prepar� a detailed statement of revenues collected for the two preceding completed fiscal years with amounts estimated to be collected for the current fiscal year, and an estimate of revenues for the ensuing ,fiscal year. The estimates s�iall be submitted to the council at its first regular monthly rm eting in August and sha71 b� published i� th° off;cial publication prior to the August meet�ng. ���e-E}��-r�a�a�e�-sba��-sa��}�-w}�4�-es��r�a�es-s�eb-e�g�a�a�e�y-s�a�e�e��-e�-��a�e�e��s as-be-�ay-�ee�-peees�a�y;-ap�-����p�-�be-�����-�a�a-yea�s-�p�e�-���s-eba�=�e�-be-sWa}} �e-a��ber=}�ed-�e-}��e���e�-�be-�e��}�e!�e��5-e�-��e-seE��e�-as-�=e��}����-e��y-saeb ,se��a�=�se�s-8�-��e-e}�,�-�}papEes-vd}�b-�bese-e�-�be-��=e�d}e�s-�vve���e��-e�-�be-e��y as-�ay-�e-�eas���e-a��-pe��}�e��. �Section 7.05, PASSAGE OF THE BUDGET. The budget shall be the principaT item of b�siness at thefirstregular monthly meeting of tne council i�� August, and the council shall hold subsequent meetings f rom time to time until all the estimates have been considered. The meetings shall be s'o conducted as to give inte rested citizens a 'reasonable amount of time in which to be heard, and an opp.ort��nity to ask questions. The budget estimates shall be read in full and the city manager s�all explain the various items thereof as fully as may be deemed necessary by the council. The annual �budget finally agreed upon shall set forth in such detail as ir�ay be determined by the city council, the complete financial plan of the city for the ensuing fiscal year, and shall be signed by the majority of the council upon being adopted. It shall � indicate the sums to be raised and from what sources, and the sums to be spent and for what purposes, according to the plan indicated in Section 7.04. The total sum appropriated sha11 not exceed the total estimated revenue, The council shall adopt the budget during the month of �e��e��e� October by ordinance whicn shall set forth 'the total of the budget and the totals of the major divisions of the budget, according to the p1an indicated in Sect�ion 7.04. The budget as adopted shall be published in the official publication. �'� �J ' � � ' n S�ction 7.09, LEVY AND COLLECTION OF TAXES. On or before the 5th day of 9E�e�e� November each year the council shall levy by resolution the taxes necessary to meet the requi rements of the budget for the ens ui ng fi s cal year. The ci ty cl erk shal l transmi t to the county auditor annually not later tf�an the lOth of 9E�o�e� November, a statement of all the taxes levied, and such taxes sha11 be collected and the payment thereof be enforced with and in like manner as state and county taxes. No tax shall be invalid by reason of any informality in the manner of levying the same, nor because the amoun t levied shal l exceed the amount requi red to be raised for the speci al purpose for whi ch the san�e is levied, but in that case the surplus shall go into a suspense fund, and shall be used to reduce the levy for the ensuing year. Section 7.14, ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS. The city manager shall be the chief accounting officer of the city and of every branch thereof, and the council may prescribe and enforce proper accounting methods , for�ns , bl anks , and other devi ces consi stent wi th the law, this charter, and the ordinances in accord with it. He shall submit to the council a state�nt each month s�owing the amount of money in the custody of the city treasurer, the status of all funds, the amount spent or chargeable against each of the -5- ' � � � � � � � � � � � � ' GE PUQLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CHARTER CfiANGES (CONTI(VUED) annual budget al lowances and the bal ances 1 eft i n each , and such other i nformati on rel ati ve to the fi nances of the ci ty as the counci 1 may requi re. The counci 1 may at any time.and shall annually provide for an audit of the city finances by a certified public accountant or by the department of the state authorized to make examinations of tf�e affairs of municipalities. On or before the first day of Apral in each year the city manager shall prepare a complete financia] statement in form approved by the council of the City's financial operations for the preceding calendar year, and uarter, wb}eb-s�a�er�e��-�ay-�e-�a��}sbed-}p-s�eb-�a�pe�-as-�be-ea�pe��-�ay �}�eE�-a� -a-s�►�a�,�-�be�ee�-sba��-�e-�a���sbe�-}�-�be-e���e�a�-pews�a�e�-ep-e� �e#'e�e-A��}�-�8�b-e�-eaeb-yea�.- which statement may direct and a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaoer on or before the third week in April, July, October, and January as a�propri ate. Section 10:05, RATES AND CHARGES. Eve ry public utility o r franchisee making use of the street or public places within the city shall give courteous, efficient and adequate servi ce at reasanable .rates. A reasonabie rate shal l_ he construed to be one which will, with efficient management, normally yield a fair return on all property used and useful in furnishing service to the city and its inhabitants. This shall not be construed as a guaranty of a return and in no case shall there be any return upon franchise value. Within these limits the determination of maximum rates, fares, or charges to be c{iarged by any public utility or franchisee for service rendered to the ci ty or any person , persons , fi rm or corporati on wi thi n the ci ty shal l be made , if possible, by direct negotiations between �he public utility or franchisee and the council. In case of failure to reach an agreement by this method within a reasonable time the council may, in its discretion, agree to submit to arbitration on such terms as it may deem feasible or upon such terms as the franchise provides for, the fixing of rates, fares, or charges by the public utility or franchisee; provided, however, that the rates, fares, or charges so fixed by arbitration shall not be bin ding on the city for more than five years. Section i0.06, PROVISIOWS OF FRANCHISES. Every franchise shall contain, among other things, provisions relating to th� following: (1) The term of the franchise granted, which shall not exceed 25 years. (2) Rates , fares an d charges to be charged by the publ i c uti 1 i ty ar franchisee in comnliance with the terms and provisions of Section 10.05. 1 ( 3) The ri ghts reserved to the ci ty i n connecti on wi th the erecti on of. pol es , masts or other fixtures in the streets or public places and the attachment of wires thereto, the laying of tracks in or of pipes or conduits under the streets or pub1ic places, and the placing in the streets or other �ublic places of any permanent or semi-permanent � fixtures or equipment by the public utility or franchisee. (4) The prompt repair by the public utility or franchisee of all damages to the � public streets, alleys and public property occasioned by the acts or omissions of the public utility or f ranchisee. i (5) The rights of the city to have access to all books, reco rds, and papers of the ■ public utility or franchisee which in any way deal with, affect or record its operations within and pertaining to the city and pertaining to property and equipment used and � useful in furnishing service to the city and its inhabitants. � -6- GF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CHARTER CNANGES (CO�VTINUED) E��-Eae�y-€�apeb}se-�ay-Ee��a}�;-a�e�Q-e�ber-�b}p�s;-��e��seps-�e�a�}p�-�e-�Re €e��ew�p�.. , 4�� � The power and right of the city to sumbit to arbitration the fixing of any raies , fares or charges to be made by the publ i c uti 1 i ty or franchi see. ��� � The right of the public utility or franchisee to receive upon condemm�ation proceedings brought by the city to acquire the public utility or franchisee compensation for its franchise or the value th�reof, if any. Section 10.09, PU3LIC HEARINGS. Before any franchise ordinance is adopted or any rates , fares or charges to be char-ged by the publ i c uti l i ty or franchi see are fi xed, there shall be a public heairng by the council, in regard thereto. Notice of such public hearing shall be given by published notice at least once in the official newspaper not less than twenty (20) days prior to the date of such pu bli.c hearing. Additional notice of such oublic hearing may be given in such manner as the council shall determine. MARVIN C. BRUNSELL CITY CLERK PUQLISH: P9arch 17 and 24, 1976 i 1 - 7- � � 1 � � � I I � � � � � , � r � C�� � Y`�'le � � 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ANOKA COUNTY 560.3450 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 February 23, 1976 Honorable Mayor William Nee and City Council Members: Dear Bi11, The Charter Commission, after the Council's review of the sug- gested changes last year, held a series of ineetings, discussions, taking into our deliberations the input of the Council and other civic organizations, and we are proposing the changes attached. These changes, we believe, will meet most of the previous objec- tions raised, and in all cases we feel better clarification of the intent of the change. Many of the section changes �are minor and are only to make sections consistent with every other. SECTION 6.05,6.06 - The changes are from dollar amounts to amounts authorized by state statute without a dollar figure, so the Char- ter can always be in tune with statutes. SECTION 10.05, 10.06, & 10.09 - Adds "franchisee" to the public utility which should cover present and future needs of the city. Mr. Virgil Herrick has reviewed these proposed changes and finds them proper with regard to the legal points. Bi11, it is the hope of the Commission that the Council would concur with our proposed changes and pass the necessary ordinance to put the changes into effect. However, any proposed changes that the Council does not act upon, the Commission will put on this fall's election ballo.t. After the changes are accepted by the Council or the voters, a new up-to-date Charter can be printed. We understand that there are not many copies of the present Charter in existence. Bill, when the Council sets the date for the hearing on these proposed changes, if the Commission members can be notified of the date, many of the members could be in attendance. If you or members of the Council have any questions, feel free to give me a call. Yo�rs truly, l��� . L�/�cc-C�.,, Ra mond Sheridan Chairperson Cl,�rtnr f rimmi cci nn l� v � � � ' , ' 1 � � � RESOLUTION N0. -�1976 � � 7 � RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVE- MENT PROJECTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed witf� the City Clerk tabulated statements in dup�icate showing the proper descrip:-ion of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in special session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity rias been given to all interested persons to present their objections, i�f any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item tf�ereof, and no objections have been filed; except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: ' 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land ' enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the ' � � ' ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. � 0 � , PAGE 2=- RESOLUTION N0. - 1976 � � ' , 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and altera- tions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land res- pectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and con- stitute the special assessment for ST. 1975-1 AND ST. 1975-2 STREET IMPROUEMENT PROJECTS I 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bPar interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of seven and one-half (72) per cent per annum. ' ' � r, � � ' 9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments payable on the lst day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1977, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. . 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the lst day of January in each year. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS ' ,DAY OF ' ATTEST: , 1976. MAYOR William J. Nee ' CITY CLERK � Marvin C. Brunsell ' 7A 0 �� . �� g � � ' ' ' � ' ' r , ' ' ' � � ' RESOLUTION N0. - 1976 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER,.SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT N0. 117 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVE��IENT PROJECT N0. 1J7 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of eaeh ai�d �:�rery 1ot, p�iece, or parcel or land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in special session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any,� to sucn proposed assessment, or to any item ihereof, and no objections have been filed; except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council fincis that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by tfie WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 117 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the desc�°iption of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. t � $ .A , ' ' PAGE 2 -- RESOLUTION N0. - 1976 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modif�ed, and correc-ted with the changes and altera- tions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land res- pectively. � 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and con- stitute the special assessment for 1 WATER, SANITARY SE4dER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 117 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear I interest from the date hereof until the sam� have been paid at the rate of seven and one-half (72) per cent per annum. �' 9. Such assessment shall be payable in twenty (20) annual installments payable on the lst day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1977, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the � County Auditor. . 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the ' County Auditor af Anoka County a cer��:ified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due i;hereon on the lst day of January in each year. ' ' ' � , The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the sam�. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1976. ' ATTEST: , - ' � CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR William J. Nee 0 RESOLUTIOPi N0. A RESOLLTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - T V SOLIDIFICATZON AND PIPE REPATRS FOR SANITARY SE�VER AND STORM SE�'lER AND RIGID PAVEI�ZENT SLABJACKI NG BE T"�I�ESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, as follows: 1. That it is in the interest of the City to award bid contracts for +he fallowing items or materials: T V SOLIDIFICATION AND PIPE REPAIRS FOR SANITARY SE�VER AND STOR'_VI SEi4'ER. AND RIGID PAVEMENT SLABJACK7JvTG 2. A copy of the specifications for th� above described items and materials, together with a proposal for the me�thod of purchase and the payment thereof have been pre�ented to the Council by the City Ivlanager and the sazne are hereby.approved and adopted as the plan.s and s�ecifications, and the me�hod oi acquisition and payment to be required by the City with respect to the acquisition o� said items and materials. 3. The purchase oi said items and materials as described above shall be effected by sealed bids to be received and opened by the City of Fridley on the 23rd day of April, 1976. The City n4anager is directed and aizthorized to adverti_se for the purchase oi said items and matcrials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by law and the Charter of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially in forrn as that shown by Exhi.bit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official ne�vspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFiF CITY OT FRIDLEY THIS �TTEST: CITY CLERK - �tARVTN BRUNSELL DAY OF , 1976 MAYOR - �'VILLIAI�7 IVE� � � u � �,_J ' ' ' ' IJ 9 ,� CITY OF FRIDLEY BID NOTICE �or T V SOLIDIFTCATION �ND PIPE REPAIRS FOR SANITARY SEWER A D STORM S�jYER AND RIGID PAVEhIENT SLABJACKING The City C bids on T Storm Se�ve April 19?6 Ha11, 6431 (telep�lone of the spe in disqual Each bid s Cash, or B of FridZey ( 5`i�e) of th bidder neg has bE:en a EXHIBIT "A" uncil of the City of Fridlc,y, h2innesota will accept sealed Solidification and Pipe kepairs �or Sanitaxy Sewer and and Rigid Pavement Slabjacking on the 23rd day of until 11:30 A.Ri, on said date at the Frid�.ey City Uri��ersity �!veni�e N. F. Fr_ i.r�ley, Minnesota 55432 571-3450) o .�11 bids mus�: me�t f.he minimum requi.remet��s i�ica�ions. Failu��e to cc�mply witYa this section can restzl� fication c�f t�ze b�-ck. . all be accompanied by a Certified Check, Cashier's Check, d Bond anci made payabl, w:ithou�: conditions to t.l1e City I�7ir�neso�a, �n an axnauni ��� not 1.ess i.han five percent bid, which check, cash or bond shall be �orfeited if ects or re�uses to enter into contract, after his b�.d ce�ted . The City r�s�rves the right i;u accept the bid which is determined ' to be in ��e best interests of the City. The City reserves the right �o re,;iect �.ny and a�1 bids arzd ���aive any informalities or technical- ities in a�.y bid received witlzaut exp7_anation. ' ' The C�'.ty Cd�uncil also reserves the right to consider such factors as tir.��e of'�,delivery or performance, experience, responsibility of the b:Ldder, past per£ormance of sitnila� �ypes of items or materials, avail��b�it� of products and other similar factors that it may deter- mine '�;o be' in the best interest oi the City . ' Copie.� of �he specifications and general conditions may be examined in thE� offlice of the qurchasing Agent, or copi�s may be obtained from Jzis o'�ffice. , ' ' Al1 b:ids m��ust be submitted in sealed envelopes and plainly marked on the o��tsidje with T V SOLIDIFICATlON AND PIPE REPAIRS FOR S�NITARY SEtiYER AND ISTORII SE�UFR AND RIGID PAVEi�1ENT SLABJAChING. ,• Fublish: �IFridleY Sun � ' April 14, 1976 April 21, 1976 Nasim M. Qureshi City hianager MEb90 T0: I �� � MEMO FROI�{ DATE: SUBJGCT: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager Richard N. Sobicc}i, Public {Norks Director April 9, 1976 Resolution to Advertise for Bids; Televising and Slabjac]<ing � Please b advised the attaclied r.esolution would aut}iorize the Administ ation to proceed with the advertisement for bids for tiie refe enced improvemeilts . Ariy requi�red improvements would be on an emergency basis only and providesla means for the City to maintain its sanitary sewer, storm sewer an� concrete streets �aithout the addition of specialized equipmen and personnel. The serv�.ces of the low bidder caould be used only when rec{uested by the C'�ty Administration to perform a function which cannot Ue performe� by City personnel. Tlle exisl�ing one year contract expires on D4ay lst, therefore it is reque�ted the Ci_ty Council consider the resolution a.dvertising for bids�liat the April 12, 1976 meeting in order to allow the Adriinist ation to proceed to determine a contractor for tl�e year D4ay 2, 1�76 to T4ay l, 1977. RNS/ j m ' Att:ach. ' ' ' 0 ' i ' � �