The URL can be used to link to this page

08/16/1976 - 5718JANET KONZAK ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 16, 1976 MEMO T�: � .. � i 1 1 1 1 ' 1 ' . � � � 1 � ' 1 �i ' I . ' ' ' DEPARTMENT HEADS Following�are the "ACTIONS NEEDED". Please have your answers back in the City Manager's affice by Noon, Wednesday, September 8, 1976. Thank you FRIDLEY CITY COU�CIL - REGULAR MEETING � AUGUST 1b, 197n - 7:30 P,i��i, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: All Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES: �EGULAR MEETING, Ju�Y 26, 1976 Approved * REGULAR MEETING, QUGUST 2, 1976 Approved ADOPT I 0�� OF AGE►JDA : Added: Revision of fee schedule for Second Access 8uilding Consideration of Communication from Anoka County Regarding Designation as Economic Development Area OPEy FORUih, VISITORS: .. CONS IDERATI ON OF ITEMS I�IOT ON AGENDA - 15 i��I NUTES) 0 1 � �� REGt1LAR i�EtTING, AUGUST 16, 1976 PI�GE 2 OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF LOCATION FOR HOCKEY AND FOOTBALL ' ASSOCIATION Si'ORAGE BUILDING ON CTTY PROPERTY �TABLED g/Zf7�� . � , . , . � � � . � . � � . . � . � . � . 1 � Location approved PARKS & REC ACTION NEEDED: Inform Associations of Council approval 1 0 NEW BUSINESS: . �� COiVSIDERATION OF R�APPRO\'AL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S, #76-01, INNSBRUCK �VORTH TOWNHOUSE IV & V , , , . , , , ,Z - 2 � Final Plat �eapproved NGINEERING ACTiON NEEDED: Inform applicant of reapproval � � � C�NSIDERATION OF REAPPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDiVISION ' P�S, #76—�2, INNSBRUCK VIL�AGE� � � � , � , , , . � . . � , 3 — j A � � � F�nal Plat Reapproved NGINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of reapproval � � � ' I' �� , � � REGU LAR N1EET I tdG, AUGUST lb, 1�76 PAGE 3 idEW BUSI��ESS (Car�TiHU�D) � CONSIDERATION OF REAPPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION � P,$. #73-09, ALICE WALL ADDITION� . � , , � � � , . , . . , Final Plat reapproved and approved execution of agreement " GINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of reapproval and execute agreement and see that the agreement is filed at Anoka County before the plat is signed by the City. �F j � 4-4F RECEIVING THE I�1INUTES OF THE PLAf�NING COMMISSION ��IEETING o� Ju�Y 28� 1976 , , � , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 5 - 5 S l. CONSIDERATION OF APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF � �JULY 13, 1�76, . , , , . . . � . , , . . , � , . 5A - ��. A. �'IR� i�IEURURER, 3`�O �%TH PLACE� l�ISCUSSED TO— 5A - yG MR. , iOHNSON, 38� 57�� PLACE ) � E T H E R, �� & 5L S GOM�.. RECOMMEI�DATION: APPfZOVE WITN STIPULATIONS CO_!.t �IL ACTION REC� itRFn; �0(�SIDERATION OF � RECOMMENDATION This item was tabled until the next meeting ENGINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Put back on next regular meeting agenda � 2, � GINEERING ' �� {i I LLW I ND ADD I T I ON, PLAT $l1BD I V I S I ON #76-G6 ..., 5P - 5Q PLANNING COMM� RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE WITH & 5S STIPULATIONS �9UNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: $ET PUBLIC HEARI.NG FOR SEPTEMBER 20, 1�7b Public Hearing to be set ACTION lVEEDED: Make arrangements for the public hearing on September 20, 1976 I �� 1 � f � REGULAR "1EETIiVG, AUGUST 16, 19.76 I�EW BUSIiVESS (CoNTiauED) PAGE 4 RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNtNG COMMISSION �Y�EETING _ o� AususT 4, 1976, , � , , , , , , , , , , , . � . , , . , , b - 6 �F 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF � . . �ULY 2%. 1976 � . � � � � � � � . � � � . . � � � 6A - 6L ._ A. MR� BURKHOLDER, l�b %�TH WAY N�E�� ,�. 6A - 6D . APPEALS COMM � RECOMMENDA�OIV : APPROVE & 6L GOUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION � This item was tabled until the Council Meeting of September 13, 1976 �;GINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Put this item on the Council agenda of September 13, 197b � Work with Mr. Burkholder to get cooperation from Barry Blower on joint j,� parking lot use �� INANCE , I� �J B� TOWN CRIER PANCAKE H�USE, %%3O UNIVERISITY� �6D - 6F PP AL5 C4MM� RECOMMENDA7IQN: APPROVE �,OUNCIL ACT�QN REQUIRED_: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION Request for sign variance approved ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of approval C� VARIANCE FEE SCHEDULE� � � . � . � . � . � , 6G BpPEALS COMM� RECOMMENDATION� �Z5 MAXIMtfM CHARGE CQUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED; CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION A breakdown of fee schedules is to be provided to the Council ACTION NEEDED: Put this item back on the next agenda with a breakdown for review � ENGINEERING i� E�INEERING � � � � � / � C1 REGULAR MEETIidG, AUGUST 16, 1976 ��EW BUSINESS �CONTINUED) (PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUS7 �, ��%6 CONTINUED) �� OSEPH SINIGAGLIO, SPECIAL �SE PERMIT, SP#%b-1i, 4715 3RD STREET � � � � . � � � � � � � ' ` ' ' ' 6P& 6FF iLA�(�G COMM , RECUMME�AT I ON ; APPROVE COUNCIL ACTION REQUIR�D: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION Special Use Permit approved �CTION NEEDED: Inform applicant PAGE 5 r 3 . 40' LoTS , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , � , � , , , 6s - 6 cc PLANNING COMM� RECOMMENj�]'ION: WORKSHOP MEETING BETWEEN CITY COl1NCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSI4N COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: SET DATE FOR WORK— SHOP MEETING, IF DESIRED� This is to be discussed at a joint meeting to be held in about six weeks. ACTION NEEDED: Set up meeting to discuss with Planning Commission COfVSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO WAIVE ENFORCEMEN7 OF PROVISION IN SI6N ORDINANCE FOR LIMITED TIME, SCHAAF VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE. . � . . � � � . � . . � . . . . . . . � . � � . . T Reguest withdrawn NO ACTION NEEDED 0 I � �• � � �� J li �� REGULAR f�EET I i�G, AUGUST 16, 1976 PAGE 6 iUEW BUSI�lESS CCONTZn�UED) CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER OF LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE AMERICAN LEGION CFROM 13�.5 RICE CREEK ROAD TO THE FRONTIER CLUB, 7365 O�D CENTRAL AVENUE). . � . � � . � � � � � — � B Ordinance (Not numbered yet} adopted. 7ransfer of liquor license to be brought back atter ail stipulations in original rezoning , request are taken care of. Ordinance to be numbered and published after everything is completed. CE ACTTON NEEDED: Bring Liquor License transfer request back on future agenda when all stipulations are taken care of . , F NCE �� CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM GEORGE M� NANSEN COMPANY — I9%6 AUD I T � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � • � 9 ' Approval given to conduct the 1976 audit ACTION NEEDED: Inform George M. Hansen Company of Council approval F�E DEPT. f ' 1 ' CONSIDERA7ION OF REVENUE BONDS FOR INDUSTRIAL SPRAY PAINTING� � � . � . . . � � � . � . . � � . � � . � . . � � ZV — 1� � Council gave concept approval . ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Counci�'s concept approval CONSIDERATION OF FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACT WITH THE �ITY OF HTLLTOP � . . . . . . � . . � � ■ � � � � � � • • . 11 — 11 � Contract approved ACTION NEEDED: Execute agreement , � . 1 � � N�NEERING � INEERING , � � E�INEERING � �� F ANCE , REGULAR �EETIidG, AUGUST 16, 1976 y�W BllSINESS (CoNTrNUEn) PA�E 7 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO ALLOW A ONE FOOT ENCROACHMENT INTO A DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEME�T AT %3�g SYMPHONY STREET. . � . � � . � � . � � . � � . � � � � IZ � IZ F Approved ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of approval 0 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO I�LLOW A ONE FOOT ENCROACHMENT INTO A DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT AT �35$ SYMPHONY STREET. � . � � . . � � � . � � . � � Approved ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of approval ,,,.13-13D CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - WARNING AND REGULATORY TRAFFIC SIGNS, IIARK�RS, SIGN POST AND INSTALLATION HARDWARE� � ► . � � � � � � � . � � � 14 - 14. A Resolution #77-1976 adopted � ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with advertising for bids CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTI�N DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTTNG ELECTION �UDGES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 14� 197b PRIMARY ELECTION. �..��. Resolution #78-1976 ACTION NEEOED: Proceed as authorized , , , . . . 15-15E � r �� I�CE � I � � � INANCE �� 'I NCE I �NC L � �� ' REGULAR MEETING, AUGUST 16, 1976 NEW BUSINESS CCoNTrNUED� CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OtRECTING PREPARATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECI' IVG� II� . . . . . � � . � � Resolution #79-1976 ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized 0 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No,119,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Resolution #80-1976 ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1976-1, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Resolution #8T-1976 • ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION �IRECTTNG PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1�%6-�� , � , , , , . , , , � � � , Resolution #82-1976 ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized PAGE 8 16-1eA 17 - 17 A 1� - 18 A 19 - 19 A � + 1 � . � F ANCE � I � � F ANCE � REGULAR MEETIiVG, AUGUST 16, 1976 PAGE 9 NEW BUSINESS (CoNZiNUED) � � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE �9%b SERVICE CONNEC7I ONS � , � . � � � � � � � � . � � � � � . . . . . � � l� - Zl� A Resolution No. 83-1976 ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIt�G PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT �OLL FOR THE 1976 S�RVic� �ONNECTIONS � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � � Resolution No. 84-1976 ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized DISCUSSION REGARDING CONiINUING I�IEMBERSHIP IN SUBURBAN RATE �►UTNOR I TY . , � � � � � � � , � , � � � , , � � � � . � Membership in Suburban Rate Authority approved NO ACTION NEEDED 21 - 21 � �Z � , � APPOINTMENT: CIT E��IPLOYE � � Y E, ..............23 Park & Recreation Secretary appointed C�'Y MANAGER ACTION NEEDED: INform accounting of new employee -T I � �, � � � � i � � ' � REGULAR MEETIiJG, AUGUST 16, 1g76 ! �El� $�$1 N�$S i�ON7 I fJUED) � _ . �LAIMS � � . . � � � � . . � � . . . . � . . � . � . � . � � F�ANCE Approved , A ION NEEDED: Pay claims as approved , I� � ' � PAGE 10 24 . LICENSES. . � . , , � � � . � � � � � � . . � � � � � ,� � � �5 — Z5 • Approved ' ACTION NEEDED: Issue licenses ; EST IMATES � � � . � � . � � . � . � � � � � � � . � � : . � � Zb - 26 B ; Approved ' ACTION NEEDED: Pay estimates ' REVISICN OF FEE SCHEDULE FOR SECOND ACCESS BUILDING Council approved charging $80 rather than $120 fee for secor,d a,�ccess building ACTION NEEDED: Bring back ordinance for adoption changing fee schjedule � CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM P,NOKA COUNTY REGARDING DESIGNATION AS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA Council directed administration to take suggestions that were r�ade by , Anoka County and add other feasible public and private project',recommendations and bring them �ack to the next Conference ^�teeting to be prioritized. E INEERING ACTION NEEDED: Prepare recor�mendations for next conference me$ting. ��: L� �� It � FRIDLEY CIT COUNCIL EET N , Y M � G � - � ,� �ASE SIGN NAME ADpRESS ANQ ITEM NUMBER INTERESTEO IN DAT�:' % E ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER ________________�-�_=__________=____-________==__�_____________=______�_________-__=___=_=_= !��'� �.c�,�,e.� �. � �. I � � ,�,� � o � �.-��.-, oi� l a .;��%'�e,�/y.� \ I"1 �. ' ,, f, S Z� - � `l�`� ��e � .►� � . �3'r n f�, . � � . �/ ti : ��C1G.� `� �G ' S' �--�',�p r��a ST �t� � A : �l �� N��: � ,l I � 3 �, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETI:NG OF THE FRIDLEY CITY'COUNCIL OF AUGUST 1 l k 6, 1�76 � ;�. : �� ; � � � THE MINUTES OF THE RE6ULAR P1EETING OF TIIE FRIULEY CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 16, 1976 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council af August 16, 1976 was called to order at 7:40 p.n�. by ��layor P1ee. PLEDGE OF ALl_EGIANCE: Mayor fJee led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: NiEMB[RS PRESENT: Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Starwalt, Councilwoman Kukowski, Councilman Hamernik and P4ayor Nee. MEMBERS A[3SENT: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: REGULAR COUN;'IL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976: MOTION by CouncilF�oman Kukowski to adopt the minutes of the P,egular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of July 26, 1976 as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the i�otion carried unanimously. RF6ULAR P1[FTING OF AUGUS? 7_> 197E P90TION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt tl�e njinutes of the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 2, 1976 as submitted. Seconded L�y C��iincil�-�oman Kukowski. Upon a•voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGEND.A: Councilwoman Kukowski stated that she would like to have It�m 8 moved to first place of New Business. ��iayor Nee asked if there was any objection to this, and there was no objection. Mayor tJc�e stated that there ti,�ould be added discussion•of the revision of the fee schedule for second accessory buiidii�;s and also added discussion reyardiny a conununication from Anoka County regarding de�ignation as EcoCi01111C Development Area. MOTION by Councilman Star�-dalt to adopt the agenda as amencled by i:ne aforementioned addii:ions. Seconded by Councilwoman Kuko�vski. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee dec]ared the motion carried unanimously. OPEtd FORUM, VISITORS: A visitor discussed having ligilts on the tennis court in the evenings since the court is heavily used and enjoyed. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that. the Park and Recreation ' Commission could undertake this and Mr. Qureshi, City �danager, stated that it will be reviewed and if feasible, it would be done. I � � OLD QUSINESS: � CONSIDERATION OF LOCATION FOR MOCKEY AND FOOTLALL ASSOC1AiIGN SFORAGE 6UILDING 0(� ' CITY PROPERTY �7ABLED 8%2/76 : Mayor Nee asked if there vias anyone from the Hockey Association to deliberate on this matter and Mr. Lynn Fischer, 525 6th Avenue N.E., spoke on the Association's behalf. Mr. Qureshi theri stated that the City has reviewed all of its properties in the hope of ineeting the'Association's needs, yet not limiting a sizable portion of public property for the residents' use. Mayor idee asketi if the site chosen was behind Target> and Mr. Fischer responded it was and i°eferred to it as Cheri Lane. Councilman Starwalt then questioned the vandalism aspect and htr. Fisclier assured him that reyular checks by the Police Department would be made. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the location as outlined on the map as the chosen site for the Football and Hockey Association. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � � ■ � �26 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1976 PAGE 2 NEW BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER OF LIqUOR LICENSE FOR THE AMERICAN I.EGIOIV (FROM 1315 RICE ING Ofd RE_ZOf�1NG_RCt�UEST, ZOfJING ORUI CENTRAL IIVENUE IV.E.: �pa, �, a� Mr. Bill Kinkel, American Legion Post 303, spoke on behalf of the American Legion. He stated that the only problem was parking and they had approxiriately seventy � parking spaces which were only half of what they needed. He further stated that he did not feel thai: the Legion �•;ould ever f�ave 560 people at one time and that 140 parking spaces would not be needed. i��ayor Nee tnen asked for a Staff report on it. Mr Dick Sobiech, Public Worl;s Directo�°, responded that they met with Mr. Kinkel separately, and discussed certain buildiny requirements of the location and that four items came into play: rezoniny, sprinkling, parking, and landscapinq requirements. He further stated that the use of the structure by the Legion is considered a lodge or private club and the occupancy rate in excess of 300 people would require rezoning. If the occupancy rate is less than 300, then the existing C-1 zoning could be used. In excess of 300, rezoniny to C-2S would be required. The sprinkling requirement was based on the intended use of the building by the Ar�erican Legion and the inter- pretation by the building ar-�d fire prevention people that this structure would then be an assembly structure. If it is an asse�nbly type of structure then sprinkliny would be required based on the particular fact that the structure is of a wood construction. He further stated that regarding parking, according to the Uniform Building Code, an asse�nbly structure requires seven square feet per occupant. The floor;plan as presented consisted of approximately 4,500 sq. ft. in the main area '. and a certain square footaye in the bar, and certain square footage in tne game room. ' Each of these areas have different occ.upancy rates. After totalling these all up, the requirenient �vas 560 people. In other 4v:�rcis, trie structure �.�ould be allowed to . have 560 people. Discussion revolved around the fact that the American Legion did not think they would have that many people. However, based on the 560 requirement, the normal commercial typn of seating capacity of one car for every four occupants results in a parking plan of approximately 140 spaces and that is different than the parking requir<:,nenis for a restaurant/tavern type oper°ation which requires one parking stall for every three occupants, so the commercial rate has been applied and they do not coine under the intoxicating liyuor license. f�1r. Sobiech also stated that there was further discussion regarding buying the adjacent property in order to come up v�ith the additional parking plan. However, at this point based on the particular occupancy, Nr. Sobiech stated that that would be the parking requirement. Ne also stated that at the present time, Council has adopted the first reading of the ordinanee for rezoning of C-1 to C-2S based on an ag'reement with stipulations and it should be pointed out that a number of those items in that agreement with the previous owner are now beiny taken care ofi with the existing owner and that the present owner was agreeable to the terins of the agreement and is proceeding with the remodeling and landscapiny and at this point in time all that is needed is a second reading of the ordinance. Mr. Sobiech also pointed out that in other cases a certain amount of parking has been allowed by Council; however, shoulci parking be a problem, then other parking would be provided. Mr. Kinkel stated that the Legion would be incurring an exhorbitant expense in buying ex�ra property. Again, he stated that the Legion is not going to have 560 people and if they do> they vaill buy the place themselves. He stated that he did not think they would have more than a couple of hundred people. Councilman Starwalt stated that in all the years he's been a Councilir.ember, he is convinced that the requirements that have beer established,which the City [ngineer is working with, substantia1ly prove out to be that they stand the test of time. Councilman Starwalt stated that th� Council would want to apply the same standard to Mr. Kinkel's organization, the American Legion, as is reyuired of similar organizations. He further pointed out that although Mr. Kinkel stated there would never by 560 people; but should there be, this could be a problem. Mr. Henry Peterson, 6312 Pierce Street N.E., stated that he did not agree with Councilman Starwalt and proceeded to mention what the American Leyion has done for the community. He stated that he did not believe there would be more than 200 occupants. Mayor fJee then stated to Mr. Kinkle that an agreement could be entered into with the owner that in the event the City firids the parking a problem, the Legion will accept the responsibility to find more parking. Mr. Kinkel replied tf�at the Legion will be in ac�reement to get more parking if needed. Mayor Nee stated he felt � ' , Y�� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETIN6 OF AUGUST 16, 1976 PAGE 3 that it would probably be the initiative of the Council upon their finding a couple of nights a.week that there is parkir:g on the highway. He also stated that arr ayreeinent could be made in order for the Legion ta undertake this. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Sobiech if similar agreements have been made with others and i��e responded that there have been; however, in most cases it was an agreement between the prope�°ty owner that would be sharing the parking or the pi°operty o��ner already owning the property. Councilman Hamernik stated that he would be in fa�ro r of having some sort of a stipulation � on the agreement and if the Legior is going to expand their parking, he would like to see a plan as to where they will expand. Mr. Sobiech then stated that since the City Council would not be meei.ing ;or another• month, the consicieration of the second reading of the rezoning ordinance could be brought back at that time and perhaps they might have a proposed agreement with the American Leyion. 1 � � �- -1 Councilwoman Kukowski then stated that it was her unders�anciing th�.�t we would be asking the Legion to wajt on this. Mr. Sobiech responded tliat the rezonin,y is not on this even;ng's ayenda. Mr. Kinkel stated that they would �ike to start ��;ork and hopefully open in one inonth. Mayor Nee ther, stated that a mol:ion t� remove the ordinance from the table was needed. MOTION by Ccuncilman Fitzpatrick to take the ordinance from the table and place it on the agenda t!,is evenin�. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the riotion carried unanimously. t✓�OTION by Councilman Starwalt to s�aive the reading and adopt an ordinance on second reading on rezoning request,. zonirc; ordinance amendinent ZOA --75-02, Frontier Club; 7364 Central Avenue P�ortheast. 1t is to be numbered and published after all stipulations are completed. Seconded by Counciir:�an Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, a�il votiny aye, Mayor fdee declared the motion carr�'ed unanimously. CONSIDER/�TION Or REAPPROVAL OF FIf;,;L PLAT SUBDIVIS?ON P.S. ;76-01, JNNSBRUCK NORTH ----------- -------- ------=---------------- TOWNHOUSE IU & V: CONSIDERATION OF REAPPROVFlL OF fIN%;L PL/1T SUBD N ISION P.�. riG-C� P!S'ttRUCK ViLLAGE: Mr. Sobiech, the Public ldorks Direc.tor, discussed the Innsbruck I�urt:h 'rownhouse IV and V addition and the proposed Innsbruck Village. He stated that th��s� pints were before the City Council for i°eapproval sirce certain time limits have expirnd since oriyinal dpprpval; and at this point in tirr:e, the IVth and Vth additioi� is ,just as or•iginal7y presented and there are no changes. He stated that there was a mii;or change in the Innsbruck Village in that originally proposed was lOQ townhouse unit developments and after going back to the drawing �aole to draw up the hard shells, i� was discovered that by elimirating three structures that vdere originally proposecl, w'riich arnounts to twelve units in the development, t'r,ey could bett�r utilize tne property �nd make use of the existing terrain. However, i�1r. Sobiech said that this map is only a copy of the plat of Innsbruck Village as h: now has it and that the hard sh�lls f�r both the townhcuses are on file. He further stated that it ��as the intent of the developer to proceed with the original plann;ng reyues* to try to make up the three structures whicn were removed from tne origir:al iayout of Inn>bruck Village. In the end, they hope to achieve 96 uiiits as oppose� to 100 originally planned. The new Innsbruck Village plat only has 3� of *hem. �;e s"tated that they were advised that they will have to proceed through another pu;�lic hearing of the Planning Commission and the City Council and there was no guurantee af s�ar_h approval. He further stated that there was one problem in that the easement fcr the dedication of the Innsbruck North Park was supposed to have been given to the�City; 17owever, certain back taxes have not been paid. After discussion with the develoaer, he indicated that, if there is an attempt to abate the back taxes, he will pay the uack ±ax�s W1tIl the understandiny that the City would pay the special assessments. The �ack tuxes are for the years 1974, 1975, and 1976, and Mr. Sobiech said it would see,,� reaspnable that if they were willing to pay the back taxes which are approximately $2,2Cv.00, the City vrould pay the assessments. MOTION by Councilman Star•walt to approve the final plat subdivision P.S.#7fi-�T.Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye> Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the final plat subdivision P.S. #76-02. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski.• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � ' ; � IL� � i m REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1976 PAGE 4 CONSIDERATION OF REAPPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUQDIVISION P.S. #73-09, ALICE WALL ADDITION: Mr. Sobiech asked if there was anyone to represent the Wall Addition as Mr. Wall was aware that the item was on the agenda for this evening. There was no response from the audience. Mr. Sobiech then gave a brief up-date of the matter, stating that when the plat was originally approved, there was quite a bit of urgency for the develop�nent of the multiple dweliing portion. Hovaever, at the present time, there is more of a need to develop the platted residential single family lots and as noted by the letter of understanding in the agenda signed by Mr. Wall, there is an outline of stage construction which would allow development of sinyle fainily lots. Mr. Sobiech further pointed out that at this point in time, single family lots would be developed prior to the apartment house lots. MOTION by Councilman Hainernik to approve the final plat subdivision P.S. #73-09. Seconded by Councilinan Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unaniinously. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatr�ck to authorize execution of agreement to develop the Alice Wall Plat. Seconded by Council��oinan Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THC- MINUTES 0� THE F?LANNING COIdMISSION P1E[T1NG Of JULY 2i3, 1976: CONSIDERATION OF APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY l3, 1976i MR. NEURURER, 390 - 57TH PLACE - MR. JOHNSON, 3B0 57TF1 PLACE (DISCUSSED TOGETHER�: Mr. Sobiech discussed the matter regarding a request for parking in the front yard of two existing 4-pler.es located at 380 and 3g0 57th Place, which has been going on for a number of years. The owncrs were approached and requested to obtain a variance or the depressed curbing would be replaced by regular curbing. 'fhe matter was brouyht before the Appeals Commission and they did vote for approval. of the request, hoivever, certain parkiny alternativ�s were discussed: Mr. Sobiech further pointed out that the 39U 57tYi Place structure has an advantage whereby there is a garage in the rear which enables parking beind the garage and is in compliance with the existir�g code. The 380 57th Place structure has no existing garage facilities, so the majority of the tenanl�s use the existing front yard parkin9 stalls. A suggestion vras made at the Appeals Commission meeting whereby the owners could purchase property from the west and property from the east and develop a joint parking arrangement between the two buildings. Mayor Nee then asked if the owners were present. Mr. Neururer was not, however Mrs. James Johnson of 621 6ennett Drive, owner of 380 57th Place, was present. Councilman Namernik stated that in di�iving by the area it certainly did not look ve ry desirable and, Mrs. Johnson agreed. Councilman Hamernik further commented that referring to the proposal as outlined, there is still an encroachment on the boulevard area even if the variance was approved. Mayor Nee then.asked Isrrs. Johnson if some other effort could be made to come up with some other alternatives. In his opinion, up until this point no such effort has been made. Councilman Hamernik stated he felt the property ovdners could come up with an alternative and resolve this without the variance. MOTION by Councilman Ha�nernik to table the matter and see if the Staff can do something on this. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. HILLWIND ADDITION> PLAT SUBDIVISION ,176-06: MOTION by Councila�omaii Kukowski to set the public hearing for September 20, 1976. ' Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 2II, 1976. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, ! Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �. ' C_� � ' ' � ' � � ' ' � � ' ' � _ , ' ' i . _ _ _ _ __ _ _. - -•- � ; , ' � ' ! ' � , I ' ' ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1976 RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNIN6 COt�1M;SSION t4EETING OF AUGUST 4, 1976: CONSIDERATION OF APPEALS COhL�1ISSI0N MINUTES OF JULY 27, 1976: MR. BURKHOLDER, 106 77TH WAY N.E.: l 29 : � �� PAGE 5 ! � Mr. Dick Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated that this is a request for parking in the front yard, located at 77th Way and East River Road. He further pointed out that the Appeals Conanission did consider this item and did recommend approval of the front yard parking in the area. He stated that Mr. E3urkholder> 7860 Alden Way N.E. was present to discuss the situation. (�tr: Sobiech then proceeded to discuss the fact that there exists two apartment buildinys: one on which the variance request is petitioned for and has approximately three parking spaces, and the other buildiny to the vrest of it presently has parking in the front yard area. The petitioner does o�,�n the parcel of property in question. Mr. Sobiech stated that perhaps arrangements could be made whereby certain parking facilities could be planned cooperatively for the total area. He further pointed out that the situation has been complicated especially aiong 77th Way by the requests for "no parking" signs. Mr. ¢urkilolder then commented that there was just no place to go. He stated that he was surrounded by conunercial property and a sea of black top. He suggested that he would be agreeable to screen between the parking and the street. He noted that a complaint was made by Donna Anderson of 160 77th Way N.E. requesting the "no parking anytime" signs posted on 77th Way Councilman Hamernik voiced his concern for setting a precedent which would allov� front yard parking. Gouncilman Fitzpatrick shared his concern. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, suggested that Mr. Burkholder contact Qarry Qlower Company and see if some mutual agreement could be made. If not, the City Council could authorize a variance. MOTION by Counciln?an Hamernik to table this item until the September 13, 1976; Regular Council meeting and see if acceptable alternatives car. be worked out. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a veice vote, all voting aye, Mayor.P�ee � " declared the motion carried uranimously. TOW(V CRIER PANCAKE HOUSE, 7730 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.: ' � ' � ' , ' ! � i , ,i � � ' � Mr. Sobiech> Public Worhs Director, stated that this v:as a request for a varianee from 100 sq. ft. to 108 sq. ft. The existing sign being 96 sq. ft. Approval was 1•ecommended by the Appeals Commission. Mr. Craig Vargo> ?730 University Avenue Northeast, then spoke to the City Council and proceeded to show them a drawing of the sign. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the App�als Commission recommendation and approve the variance with stipulations. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE FEE SCNEDULE: Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated that the Chairman of the Appeals Commission, Ms. Virginia Schnabel, did contact him to ensure this item came before the City Council. After discussion with her, Mr. Sobiech stated that he believed there was a misunderstanding as to how the increased fee was arrived at. Apparently, the comments by the Appeals Coininission regarding the fee increase came after the varianc.e request for a 1 ft. variance on residential property. Consequently, the increased fee of $50.00 vs. what was originally $15.00 was questioned with this particular residential zoning variance request. Mr. Sobiech stated that he explained to Ms. Schnabel how the increased fee was arrived at, based on an average of variance requests on small lots of great magnitude. He further stated tiiat he indicated to Mrs. Schnabel that he would explain to the City Council and that Council would perhaps direct the Staff to prepare a more in-depth explanation to the Appeals Conunission. He then asked if there was a representative of the Appeals Commission present, and Ms. Patricia Gabel responded that she was. Mr. Sobiech asked her if his discussion explained what perhaps happened at the Commission's meeting and she responded it did. Ms. Gable suggested that perhaps what was needed WdS a breakdown. Mayor Nee then stated that the City Council will try and justify this to the Appeals Convnission. ' ; I30 REGULAR.COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1976 PAGE 6 JOSEPH SINIGAGLIO, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP#76-11, 4715 3RD STREET: !' Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated that this was a request for a special use permit which would allow a second accessory building on an existing single ' family residence and the Planning Commission did recommend approval. He pointed out that several stipulations existed. Mr. Sinigaglio,4715 3rd Street Northeast, was present and stated that his expenses are over and above what the garage cost. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that the request cost P1r. Sinigaglio $120.00. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the special use pennit be granted. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye> Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 40' LOTS: ' Mayor Nee stated that he planned to set a special meeting regarding this matter. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated that a meeting would be set up approximately six weeks from this date. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of August 4, 1976. Seconded by Council�,voman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote> all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO WAIVE ENFORCEMENT OF PROVISION IN SIGN ORDINANCE FOR LIMITED TIME, SCHAAF VOLUNTEFR COMMITTEE: Mr. Robert Meek, the Schaaf Campaign Manager, stated that he was requesting the City Council to waive enforcement of the ordinance that limits t��e size of political signs until the Committee has had the opporturity to exhaust its efforts for appeal through the Appeals Com�riission. Councilman Hamernik stated that a good deal of work has been done regarding the sign ordinance and allotving a variance would set a precedent which would invalidate anything �hat is in the ordinance; and he, therefore, questioned the consideration of this. A visitor stated that there were three members of the City Council who ai°e on Mr. Schaaf's Campaign Comniittee and she felt that there would be a conflict of interest as to Council voting on this. Mr. Wayne Wellan, 6793 Overton Drive Northeast, spoke against the request. Councilrnan Fitzpatrick stated that he was not sure that the benefit of the sign was going to be as great now with the publicity against the ordinance that perhaps would cause an unfavorable reaction. Senator Dave Schaaf then stated that he would �.vithdraw the request at this time. Councilman Starwalt then asked Senator Schaaf if he would prefer to withdraw or table the request. Senator Schaaf responded that he already withdrew. RECESS: Mayor Nee called a recess at 10:45 p.m. RECONVENED: Mayor Nee reconvened the meeting at 11:02 p.m. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO ALLOW A ONE FOOT ENCROACHP1ENT INTO A DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT AT 7348 SYMPHONI' STREET: — — CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO ALLOW A ONE FOOT EI�CROACHMENT INTO A DRAIP�AGE & UTILITY EASEMENT AT 7358 SYMPHON'f STR[ET: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to take ltem numbers 12 and 13 in the agenda out of order. Seconded by Council�aoinan Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting a.ye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. i. _ _ _ _. _ .._ ._.. . ` �: , � ' , . ' _ � ' ' , , , ' ' ' � ' � ' � � � � � � � � � ;� ' �l , 1_;i 1. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1975 PAGE 7 Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, then proceeded to discuss items 12 and 13. The area is 7348 and 7358 Syrnphony 5treet; and at this time, there are two existing structures from which the attached garages extend into an existing 6' utility and drainage easement on each of the �pecific properties. He further stated that at this time, the encroachment of 1 ft. presented no problem and suggested approval by the City Council of the encroachment request. h10TIQN by Councilman Han:e+-nik to approve the easement encroachment reyuest on the two properties. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote> all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUP�ICATION �ROM GEORGE,M. HANSEIV COhiPANY - 1976 AUDIT: MOTION by Councilv,�oman Kukows'r,i to authorize the execution of agreement with the George P1. Hansen Coinpany for the 1976 Audit. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P4ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee further commented that a letter was received from the Hansen Company with reference to the City Staff, who were highly praised. Mayor Nee then congratulated the Staff inembers. CONSIDERATION OF REVENUE 60ND� FOR INDUSTRIAL SPRF�Y PAINTING; 200 IRONTON STREET N.E.: Mr. Marvin arunsell, f"inance Director, discussed the matter statiny that the owners of the Industrial Spray Painting Company approacher� the City regarding the possibility of the City participating in the issuance of industrial revenue bonds. The bonds would be used for the purpose of purchasing the property including the exterior of the build�ng> the parking lot and possibly some in±erior work. He further stated that one of the ideas of the industrial revenue bonds being advantageo�as for the'owners of the property or the businessmen,in certain instances, is that they generally comrn«nd a lower interest rate. Howeve�°, they dc have some er.tra expense�. that °,?artially offset this, i.e. the expenses ef issuing the bonds (they have to pay a fiscal agent for services in connec,tion with the bond issue), certain City expenses in connection 4,�ith the bond issue if it does go throuyh,attorneys fees and so on for checking over certain legal documents. Mr. Brunsell, Mowever, stated that in certain instances it is advantageous to proceed with industrial revenue bonds. The City, in effect, lends its good name to tne bonds, i.e. City of Fridley, Industrial Revenue Bonds. However, technically the City is not liable should the bonds default. The property itself is the backing for the bonds. ' Councilwoman Kukowski asked if this had been done before with another company. � Mr. 3runsell stated that the City of Fridley has never issued Industrial Revenue Bonds. Mayor Nee stated that an application had been made by Olympia �eer with mortagage insurance which protected the City from any possible defaults. • ' Mr. Ernie Toews then stated that several years ago, they had problems with the landlord , and through the Coon Rapids City Council, they explored. costs, etc. They found that the interest is less and that there are added costs, bui: the total package is still cheaper than goiny through the savings and loar, or commercial banks. He also pointed out that by going the bond way, they could get it at a longer term than through a commercial lender. h1ayor fJee stated that only two members of the City Council went , � through the original process, and he felt certain that they vrould want to discuss this. Mayor Nee further stated that he would like to see niortyage insurance,and then asked , if there were any comments on the matter from the City Council. Councilman Starwalt ' questioned the Toews brothers regarding their possibly making an agreement with the � , landlord, but there didn't seem to be any possibility for this. Mayor Nee stated his inclination was that they should be somewhat positive about tFie capabilities and at ' the same time, protect the City's reputatinn. � � � � Councilman Hamernik then questioned Mr. Brunsell as to this type of bond affecting the rating. P1r. arunsell stated that it should not affect it in any way directly. If it is not part of the debt owed by the City, it wouid not he carried on the City's books. Mr. Toews stated that he and his brother needed the City Council's approval to go ahead with this and after obtaining a good deal of facts and figures, come back to the City Council with same. � � � � � � J � ' i , � � � ' � � � 133 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AU6UST 16, 1976 PAGE 9 RESOLUTION N0. $4-1976 - DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HE�RING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1976 SERVICE CONNECTIONS: � MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt Resolution No. 84-1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION REGARDING CONTINUING MEhiBERSHIF' IN SUBUkBAN R/\TE AUTfiORITY: Councilman Starwalt proceeded to discuss the matter. He stated that he gave some erroneous figures at the last discussion of the Suburban Rate Authority, and the correct figure is $525 for the proposed assessment of the adininistrative cost of the S�rburban Rate Authority for the calendar year i975. He gave a listing of ihe cities that are members of the Suburban Rate AuLhority. Councilman Starwalt stated that he believed that the Suburban Rate Autiiority membership could very definitely be advantageous to all of the people far in excess of what the $525 would be to the taxpayers. It should be recognized that this does come from the yeneral revenue and although it's difficult to justify that so much is being dorie, in fact it is happening. He suggested the minutes are available, if anyone cares to read them. Although Councilman Starwalt stated that he was impressed with the past activites of the Suburban Rate Authority, he was not sure that it could continue beyond 1977, but perhaps it should be looked at on a year to year basis.. He further pointed out that Golden Valley is the only city that has withdrawn. Councilman Fitzpatrick questioned what the meaning of "Authority" in the Surburban Rate Authority title meant. Councilman Starwalt stated that they do not have the authority to make any clear cut judginents, but that it merely presents its case to lobby against the gas and other-companies who raise i:heir rates unjustly. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt te budget �525, which vrould be seventy-five times the population vote of seven for 1977. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votirg aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. AFPO;N7M�NT - CITY EP1PL0'r'EE: NAME POSI"fION SALARY EFFECTIVE DATE REPLAC�S Joan Jensen Secretary 5690 Flugust 23, 1976 Judy Wyatt 10160 Linnet St. N.W. Parks & Recreztion per Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433 Department month (Grade 9) MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the appointment of Joan Jensen, Secretary, to the Parks & Recreatior Department. Seconded by Councilwoman Kuko��ski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unaniirously. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Ham�rnik to pay the Claim No's. 16162 - 16433. Seconded by Councilwoinan Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilwoinan Kukowski to approve the licenses as submitted and on file in the L�cense Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES: ' Smith, Juster, feikema Suite 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 � i � � � i for legal services rendered by Carl Newquist as ' Prosecutor for July> 1976 $2,228.75 ; i � � i � �, , 134 ! � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AU6UST 16, 1976 Weaver, Talle & Herrick 316 East Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 PAGE 10 For legal services rendered by Virgil Herrick, City Attorney for July, 1976 $1,185.25 MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye> f4ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. REVISION OF FEE SCHEDULE FOR SECOND ACCESS BUILDING: Mr. Marvin Brunsell, Finance Director then discussed another fee schedule issue which had been added to the agenda, stating that tf�e proposed ordinance would reduce the special use permit fee from $120 to $80 for special use permits for second accessory buildings and the �,120 fee would be for all other special use permits. This would, therefore, set up two fee schedules for special use permits, where now they are averaged together. He furl:her pointed out that there are very few permits issued for second accessory buildings, so this should not have any great impact on the averages. It would simply set up two fee schedules for the different types of permits, and the second accessory buildings are usuaily more simple in nature than the others. Councilman Starwalt then asked if the second accessory building ineant a garage. Mr. Brunsell responded that it was R-1 property, and this aiould be the only instance where there would be a secorid accessory building. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the i�educed fee. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, �ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF CGi�iMUIVICATION FROi+I ANOKA COUNTY REGARDING DESIGNATION AS ECONOMIC DEVELUPMENT AREA: � ^ Mayor fJee then discussed a new bill that was just passed, stating that it is different from the present CFTA bill in that it pays for the material plus labor. The main concern is that the City Council move quickly and in the next three or four weeks if there was anyone whe wanted in on this, there should be a plari that could be put into action within 90 days. Mayor Nee stated that he wished to raise the question of what is ready to move and to get some sense to the City Council as to what would be submitted. MOTIOf4 by Councilman Fitzpat�°ick to have Staff prepare recominendations and bring them back to be prioritized. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion was carried unanimously. ADJOURNI�iENT: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Starw�lt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Recular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 16, 1976 adjourned at 12:50 a.m. ' Respectfully submitted, Dorothy C. Green Council Secretary Approved: William J. Nee Mayor � 7HE MINUTES OF TNE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY OF JULY 26, 1976 � 0 THE MINUTES OF TNE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JULY 26, 1976 109 ` The regular meeting of the Fridley City Council of July 26, �1976 was called to ; order by Mayor Nee at 7:40 p.m. FLEDGE OF ALLEG:APlCE: P1ayor Nee welco�ed the audience and invited them to join with the Council in saying the Pledge of kllegiance to the Flag. � ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman'Starwalt, Councilman Hamernik, Councilman Fitzpatrick Mayor P�ee and Councilwoman Kukowski. ' MEMBERS ABSENT: None � PROCLAMATION: , . ; RECYCLING fOR M�JSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATTON WEEK, AU6US7 2, 1976 THROUGH AUGUST 8, 1976 Mayor Nee read the proposed Proclamation aloud to the City Council and audience. -- MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the Proclamation, naming August 2, 1976 through August 8, 1976 as "Pluscular Dvstrophy Association Week." Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried ; unanimousiy. I ; APPROVAL Of 1•�I�UTES: ; REGULAR MEETING, JULY 12, 1976: . ' MOTION by Councilwo�an Kukowski to adopt the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of July 12, 1976 as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. j ADOPTION OF R�Etr'DA: , ; MOTION by Councilman Starv,�al± to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mot�on carried unanimously. � OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Mayor Nee asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council and there was no response from the audience. • � OLD 6USINESS: ORDIt�APICE N0. C?7 - FOR VACATIOtd REQUEST, STkF[T AND ALLEY VACATIOP! SAV �76-03, BY � �BFRT SCHROER� 6EiJERALLY LOfaTED AT 7700 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.: -- — Mayor Nee stated that there iaas a hearing on the first readinq last Monday evening, _Ju]�.J 9, 1976, and it woui�d,.�a>order to take the second readinq now. . � MOT?ON by Councilman Hamernik to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 617, adopt it on the second reading, and publish. Seconded by CounciTwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Play�or Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. I 1 . .... . ,; � � � � i � i � ; , --� � � �ln � � REGULAR GOUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 2b, 1976 . PAGE 2 ORDINANCE N0. 618 - AMENDING CHNPTER 508 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY RELATIN�, TG PARKS AND PARKWAYS: � � � • Mayor Nee stated that this was in 'regard to the establishment of jurisdiction over County parks and parkways. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the readin� and adopt Ordinance No. 618 on second reading, and publish. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE N0. 619 - TO M1END CHAPTER 11 OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY CODE REGARDING SERVICE STATIONS: Mayor Nee stated that this changes the fee charge for retail gasoline sales from $30.00 to $60.00. MOTION hy Councilman Starwalt to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 619 , adopt it on � second reading, and publish. Seconded by Councilwoman Kuko��ski. Mr. Marvin Brunsell, Finance Director, then stated that he would like to suggest that the second reading of Ordinance No. 619 be amended to add, "private gasoline pumps $20.00 per location." He said that at the present time, this was something that was not licensed. • ' Mayor Nee asked Mr. Virgil Herrick, the City Attorney, if this would be appropriate. Mr. Herrick stated that it would be. i ; Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if the City inspected them. M�°. Erunsell responded that they are inspected but not to the extent that the service stations are. Councilman Fitzpatrick statea that this is a proposal that they be licensed and they are not licensed now. MOTION by Councilman ritzpatrick to amend the MOTION to include private g=s�iine pumps at a fee of $20.00 per location. Seconded by Councilman Ha�r�ernik. Upon a�doice vote, all voting aye, Mayor �Vee declared the amendment carried unanimously. The vote upon the amended h10TI0N was a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unar�imously. NEW BUSINESS: RECEIVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY CITATION AWARD: Mayor Nee showed the award plaque.received from the Automobile Club of Minneapolis to , the audience and stated that the City was awarded the plaque for an exceilent record in the field of pedestrian safety. He said it is the result of some reall,y outstanding work by the Police Department and others in the City that are concerned with Public � Safety. : , MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the plaque. Seconded by Councilman Fitxpatrick. UQon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion ca'rried unanimously. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINNPJCE AMENDING THE �ONING CQDE, CH��PTER 205.101 WHICH WOULD CHANGE "BAi2S AND TAVERNS" FRCM A PERMITTED USE I;V C-2 APjD C-2S ZONED DISTRIGTS TO A PERMITTED LSE WITH A SPECIAt__USE PERt1IT: � ' Nayor Nee stated that this was discussed at the public hearing meetina and he did not ti�in�, further discussion was necessary. Mr. tdasim M. Qureshi, the City Manager, stated that basically this would allow this use in the same zoning which is C-2 and C-2S except with a special use permit. i Mayor Nee stated that the problem which brought this before the City Council was the issuance of beer licenses in an area where there was some objection. ' MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading and adoF:t the ordinance upon the first reading. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Uoon a voice vate, all voting.aye, Playor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, i I __ i � � � � � �� , ; � , , � i � �� , , � ' � � � � � � � _,_..._ ____� � 1 ' I � � �_ � ! REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976 RECEIUING THE MINUTES OF TNE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINC, QF JULY 14, 1976: , , �� ' I PAGE 3 � Y. KLUCSAR, SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP#76-10; 1337 HILLCREST DRIVE, N.E.: - Mr. Richard Sobiech, the P.ublic Works Director, proceeded to explain the Klucsar request for a special use permit which would allow the construction of a second accessory building in excess of 240 square feet at the petitioner's home residence Mr. Sobiech stated that P1r. Klucsar was present. Mr. Sobiech further stated that >the public hearing was held by.the Planning Commission on July 14, 1976, and a motion was passed recommending approval, however, there were t�ao stipulations. In discussion with Mr. Klucsar, his intentions are to utilize the second accessory � building for si:orage purposes and to place such structure in the northwest corner , of the property. ' � i 1 , � � i � � � ' � r . � � � � � , �• . Councilman Starwalt stated that he had reviewed the property and felt that a survey of the property would be in order and that Mr. Klucsar is aware of that. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the reGuest for a special use permit as recommended by the Planning Commission with the added stipulation that a suitable survey be taken. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. K. MESROBIAN, VACATION REQUEST, SAV #76-0�1; ALLEY BETWEEPI LIBERTY AND ELY: Mr. Richard Sobiech, the Public Works Director stated that there was a great amount of discussion concerning this as indicated in the Planninp Commission minutes, and ,u�less there is a desire..t�a-go��into the matter now,.the request is for a public hearing. He stated that the date of August 9th is an error; it would have to be September 20th in order to meet the requirements for a public notice and that the petitioner has been so advised. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatick to set a public hearing for September 20, 1976. Seconded b,y Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P1ayor Nee declared the motion �arr�a-e�#••unanimously. HUPIAN RESOURCES COMMISSION--MEETING OF JULY 1, 1976: 1977 EUDGET REQUESTS: . Mayor Nee stated that the Planning Commission did not concur with the recommendation of the Human Resources Commission regarding the budget disbursernent of $10,000. P1r.Sobiech, the Public Works Director, said that any time minutes come from the Planning Commission with a statement that specifically says, "recommend to Council", it is brought to the City Council's attention. Mr. Nasim Qureshi, the City Manager, stated that Nancy Lambert, who is on the Human Resources Commission, a�ould like to discuss the matter further. Nancy Lambert then discussed the fact that there is an error in the minutes of which she was unaware. She further stated that the Human Resources Commission merely used the $10,000 figure as a simple divider. The Human Resources Commission complied with a request from the Staff that request for funding be reviewed so that priorities could be•listed in accordance to the receivinq of the funds, and that was what they tried to do. Ms. Lambert stated that she discussed the • Planning Commission's decision with Mrs. Shea, who was absent from the Commission's meeting, and they both feit that they were requested by the Staff to make recommendations for budget money priorities and now, the Pianning Commission disagrees with this. Mayor Nee asked Ms. Lambert if she was aware that the City Council took the youth ,,._:.._center into the recreatic�n,area. She replied that she was not. She then asked if all requests from Senior Citizens are to be delegated under a Pa�•ks and Recreations need. She stated that some funds shou7d be designated `or human development and ecology. .... , . . . , ; I � � � ; � �� i , I 11G REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976 PAGE 4 Councilman Fitzpatrick then questioned if the 20% �ahich was recominended for social services would go to the North Suburban fainily Service Center. Ms. Lambert said that 20% of the budget should go to social services, and it was to be decided late� tvhich agency wa.s to be the recipieni of the 20;.;. Ms. Lambert further made referenc;e to the Coon Rapids Nucleus Clinic whereby there was a duplication of services. Fer example, several alcoholic anonymous type programs which are being given elsewhere. Mr. Qureshi, the City Manager, stated that the Ci±y's desire was to get some input from the Hu!nan Resources Commission to revie.v some ef the human concerns and the money allocation be priortized. P1s. Lambert stated that the liuman kesources Commission should have a budget as the other commissions have a budgEt and wher� they receive a request for furdiny, they should not have to yo to the City Council contingency fund since the Parks and Recreations and other commissions do not have to do this. � The City P�lanager• statPd that thiere is a budget fcr the Human Resources Commission for its advisory activit;� studies and for all cominissions and that ro con�nission has an operating.budget. The budget is controlled by the City�Counc�il. Mayor iJee then comr��ented that the Human Resources was a new commission, and the Parks arid Recreation Corr,mission had made recommendation for Parks and R�creai:io�; s�rvices. The services requested are actually funded in•the Gity budaet and �he prnr�ss stai°ted the year before; therefore, the reason that the Nu��an Rescurces Co!��iiission had to ask for money out of the continaency this past year was th�t n� ��udget process was �stablished. How�ver, for the coming year, a budaet r�°ocess 4;i1] b;_ established. Mayor Nee said the Parks and kecreation Commission makes their budget rcco�timendations to P�1r. Qureshi, the City Planager, and he sorts out h�s findings. Councilr�an Star�valt asked Ms. Lambert if she had seen the minutes and she responded t{�a4 sr,e had not as she never receive�. a dr;:`t of tl�e minutes. He further stated that she needed to have an ad�r:ir;strati�,,e budget and that in his opinion, should not h�ve a project-operatinc ba.get a�hicn yeu could expend at ' - your own discretion. He st:ated no coma�iissio�� has tf�at, Cotmcilman Starwalt mentioned Lhat the 310,OOQ figure WOU�d be s!:.riker, and �ls. Lambert agreed. 1�10TICN by Councilm�n St�rwalt to receive the minutes of the Pianning Commission meeting ef July 14, 1976. Secord�d by Cnuncilwomaii Kukovrski. U;;on �, veice vote, all voting aye, Mayor N�e declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVIilG THE MI�U?ES OF Tti� CAELE TcLEVISION f�"EETINf OF JULI' 7, 19i5: MOTION by Councilman H:�mernik to receive the minutes. Seconded by Cauncilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votii.y aye, hiayor (4ee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERaTION OF A RE U':ST FR01'� MINfdESOTA HISTORICA! SOC:ETY FOR FUNDS TO PERFORM Q-- F]ELD CHECK f'C�R NISTOP,IC__OR PRt�IIS;ORIC FlRCHAEOLOGIC,aL_S;kJ�-iURES_IN NORTH PARK: Mr. Qureshi, the Ci�:y Pianaqer, said tnat this field check �is a re�uirement in areas where there is a�%otential for archaeo'ogical fin�s. h9r. Q�ireshi.statecl that w� have received a$534.OU firure arhich is the approximate cost af the first pnase uf the survey for this pr•o,ject and th2 City Council shouid decide v�hether or nat this mor�ey should be spent. The City of Frid;ey is atternpting to find out if tPie survey cost rould be iased as a par�t of tha City's share of »}a:.chiny grants from the Department cf Natural Resources. Councilman Starwalt asked if th2re was anyone in the audience to discuss this. N� further stated that,he G,�ould like to see someone do the F�re]iminary surve.y per gratis from the foundution ard chereby saving the ioundation this expenditure. � ��I �� 1 � i �:. � � � � � � � � 1 r� 0 �� REGi1LAR CQUiVCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976 PAGE 5 � Mr. Vern Moen, 7154 N.E. Riverview Terrace, stated that the surface of the ground would � be disturbed very little and the preliminary plans for phase one merely is surfacing a I parking lot and a drive-in and that the natural pathways that are already there will be used. He further stated that the Minnesota Historical Society will have to have � their specifications met in any event, either someone of our choosin9 or someone they may specify. This being very valid. Councilman Starwalt stated that perhaps these specifications could be met b,y someone on the board or someone who has shown interest in the foundation. Mayor Nee stated that we would have to find out if they would pern�it someone else to do it. Councilman Starwalt suggested that perhaps this matter could be brought back to the City Council for consideration. Mayor Nee stated they wanted to get started on this. Mr. Moen stated that a board meetinq was scheduled for 7:00 p.m. tor�orrow, July 27th; and if there is any input at that time, th2y would be glad to discuss it. He further stated that they want to get going as soon as possible. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to enter into a contract for Phase-1 preliminary field � check for historic and prehistoric archaeological sites at North Park contingent on the'finding by the administration that the use of the �1innesota Historical Society or any such agency as the supplier is the anly lawful alternative. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. • CONSIDERATION OF A REOUEST FOR A FOUR-WAY STOP SIGN AT GARDENA AND STINSON BLVD.: Mr. Sob�ech, the Public Works Director, stated that a petition was received from residents both in New Brighton and Fridley regarding the instal�ation of a four-way stop sign at the intersection of Stinson Boulevard and Garder,a Avenue. Eoth the Councils of Fridley and New Brighton have received petitions and the City of Fritlley in cooperation with the City of New_Brighton have made an analysis of the intersection: The fridley Police Departmen* was requested to initiate a speed study of existing traffic flow. The highest speed in the area was thirty miles per hour. The speed limit is thirty miles per hour. The majority of the vehicles traveled thirty or� less �niles per hour. There �•rere no specific accidents at the designated intersection. As reported by the Fridley Engineering Department, traffic is greater on 16th Avenue in New Brighton than on Gardena Avenue in Fridley. Mr. Sobiech further commented that the Engineering Department would request that New Briqhton install a stop sign on the southeast quadrant of the intersection. He stated that the City Council had received a report from the New Brighton Enqineering Department consistinq of the same information. Therefore, Mr. Sobiech concluded that the recominendation of the staff was that a four-way stop sign not be instal7ed and that the request be made to the City of New Brighton for the installation of a stop siyn in the southeast quadrant of the intersection. Councilman Starwalt stated that he agreed with the study and felt a stop sign wouid normalize the situation. P1ayor faee asked if the vehicle used in the radar speed study was a marked or unmarked squad car. Mr. Sobiech responded that it was a marked patrol car with a new system of radar which has a range of a quarter of a mile. Mayar Nee asked if there was anyone in the audience to discuss this. There was no respo nse. ' I� MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to concur �,�ith the recommendation of the City Engineer with reference to traffic control devices at the intersection of Stinson Boulevard and . Gardena Avenue. Seconaed by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upor a voice vote, all voting I aye, Mayor Nee declared the n�otion carried unanimously. � �� ,� � 1.14 , PAGE 6 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976 STATUS OF PA1'MENT FOR HAYES RIVER LOTS REGARDING ISLANpS OF PEACE: Mayor Nee discussed the status of the payments due on the Hayes River Lots. He then asked if hir. Jim Langelfeld, 79 - 63'-z 4lay M.E., was here as Treasurer and he replied � that he was. Mayor �ee stated that the documents report 519,350 due on August 20, : 197f� and 510,240 due on Auqust ?_0, i977, which appears to be the principal balance. Mr. Ed Wilmes, 6350 Riverview Terrace, said that they had met with the owners of the Lots (Mr. Bob hiinder and Mr. Peter Lametti) regarding pay�nent. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Langenfeld what the status was of their ability to pay the ; $3,360 interest payment or the City's willinqness to pay it. Mr. Langenfeld stated that this could be very easily met and that this could be used as part of a donation and with the fund drive, additional monies will be forthcoming. He further stated that there has been a changeover in the VFW and American Legion manuals and it has been written in the general orders that each VFW donates a qiven amount of money for this fund and as far as makinq this interest payment, he sees no problem, He then presented a revie4a� of the Accounts Payable to the City Council. Mayor PJee stated that he would like to see a letter from Mr. Minder and Mr. Lametti regardina the interest payment. • Councilman Starwalt asked how the City Council can be reassured that there will be no other authorizations of expenditures or contracts for services entered into which further. obligates the Islands of Peace in the event there is a default whereby the City woold be obligated to pay. Mr. Ed Wilmes assured the City Council that there would be no expenses between now and the lOth of August. Mr. Jim Langer�feld also assured the City Council that no major contracts would be undertaken unless the funds are available to do so. He further stated that he will be doing the IRS for 1975-76 and will present a copy to the City Council along with an up-to-date balance sheet. , �� 1 ; � , � � � � ' Councilwoman Kukowski then asked why the City's insurance did not cover this. Mr. Qureshi responded that it does not cov r the foundation. Mayor Nee said that they must �iave the insurance. Mr. Virgil Herrick, the City Attorney, mentioned that the insurance issue should be looked into and discussed at a later date. > A motion was made by Councilman Fitzpatrick and seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski that the City Council accept a written statement that the prinr_iple would be postponed and the int°rest will be paid by the foundation. �4ayor Nee then stated that the City had to pay the int?rest. � Councilman Star�valt commented that this was not a City function and that it was the foundation's obligation and if they tell us that is all they can do, then we ' have to accept it and to go on record, he stated that he was not in favor of it. Mr. Herrick then stated that the contract is with the City and there is a provision in the contract that specifies that the only thing that the owners can do on default is to cancel the contract. Ho��vever, he further pointed out that State money has ' been invested in this and should the contract ever by cancelled, the City would have �. to repay the State. Concilman Fitzpatrick then withdrew his motion and Councilwom�n Kukowski did also. Mayor Nee stated that the City Co�ncil does not want to agree in advance. Mayor Nee then proceeded to ask Mr. Wilmes for discussion ab�ut the trail funding assistance for the Islands of Peace. 1 � � � � � � �� j � ! ' I� �� RE6ULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976 • PAGE 7 After Mr. Wilmes discussed the urgency for the funding, Mayor Nee asked Mr. Jerry Boardman what the cash grant would be. Mr. Boardman responded that it would be $15,500 and the labor study would be $8,000. He further stated that they would be applying for railings along the trail, curbinq to protect wheel chairs, some stripping alongside the trails, repair on some of the trails and also some docking. There is also a shelter building and informational signs along the trails. Councilwoman Kukowski then proposed that the matter of applying for funding should wait until next Monday evening, August 2, 1976, so that the City Council could see the appropriate proposal so they can decide whether it should be submitted. Mr. Sobiech said that the City Council would have the proposal by Friday, Ju]y 30th MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to authorize the Staff to work with the foundation to � prepare an application for trail funding assistance. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee deciared the motion carried unanimously. � RESOLUTION N0. 62-1976 - ORDERIN6 IMPROVEMENT AND fINAI PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIP1ATES Of COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1975-4: Mr. Sobiech, the Publjc 4lorks Director, stated that at the public hearing there were some questions relating to the proposed improvements at University Avenue and , Mississippi Street,and University Avenue and Osborne Road consisting of resignalization, channelization and safety improvements at these locations. He stated that there was discussion at the hearing regarding condemnation of various private properties to obtain some additionai right of way to put in certain aiternates on Osborne Road � and to make the improvement at Mississippi Street. At the Mississippi Street intersection there was concern expressed by the owner of the Red Owl property that ther•e was some question in t.�e lease that Council might want to consider before approving the project. � � Mr. Virgil Herrick, the City Attorney, then commented that he had just received the ; lease this evening and his review of it has been very brief. He further stated that a section of the lease specifies that if less than 5% of the leased property is taken by condemnation, this is not suffir.ient grounds for breaking the lease. ' ; However, if the City of Fridley can substantiate the fact that the proposed taking is 7ess than 5%, the City would have to, of course, reimburse the property owner for the value of the property taken. ' �� ; � � Mayor Nee then mentioned that their only concern would be a parking problem. Mr. Sobiech responded that there is no parking problem and that the adjacent property is currently zoned residential and could accomodate a parking situation !•rith a special use permit. If parking should become a problem, it could be utilized. Mayor Nee then asked if the hedge in question on Osborne Road could be saved. Mr. Sobiech res�onded that it cou]d and the a7ternate that Staff recommended together with the Highway Department is alternate number two. He fWrther mentioned tha.t some investigation was made regarding the hedge and it can be transplanted. Mayor Nee asked if Mr. Lynn was present and there was no response. Mr. Sobiech further stated that alterrate number two would be a substantial saving. Ms. Dorothy Johnson, 340 Osborne Road, inquired about backing out onto a corr�non road. Mr. Qureshi assured her it can be done. She also inquired about having an appraiser. Mr. Qureshi stated the Government would pay up to $300 for the services of such an appraiser. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 62-1976 for alternate number two. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. '�<� I T.6 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976 RESOLUTION N0. E3-1976 •• APPP.OVING FINAL PLANS A.PID SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY MINNE---SOT7�� HIGH�DEPARiMENT-�OR ��'REET IMPR�ME-N�—PR�JECT ST. 1a�5-5: PAGE 8 MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve Resolution No. 63-19?6. Seconded by . Councilwoman Kukovaski. Upon a voice vote, all vntinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 64-1976 - AUTHORIZING EXECUTTON OF AGREFMEP�T tdQ. 5�3304 WITH f�tINNESQTA HIGNWAY DEPARTMENT FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION: _�TPFET II^PROVEMENT _PRO�IECT ST. 1975-5: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution N�. 64-1976. Seconded by Council- woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P4ayor Nee declared the motion carr;ed unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 65-1976 - AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF /1GREEP��[Ni rJO. 5E273 UIITh MI"dNESOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTI�1ENT FOR UTILITY RELOCATION AND ADJUS?MFPITS: STREET IMPROVEf4ENT PROJECT ST. 1975-5: � � MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution No. G5-197G. Seconded by Council- woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION PdO. 66-1976 - 11UTHORiZING EXECUTION OF COST PARTICIf'AT:ON AGREEPIF"dT WITH ANOKA COUNTY: STREET IMPROVEME�JT PROJFCT ST 1975-5: � v MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adcpt Resolution No. 66-19i6. Seconded by Council- woman Kukewshi. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION f�0. 67-1476 - DIRECTINu THE ISSUANCE OF TEh1PORARY ItiPROVEMf_Ni 60NDS IN ACCORDAPJCE WITH LA4dS CF 1957, CIiAPTE2 384TSTREET I'�iPROVE(��EIJT FRO� :�S ST. 1970-1 , , 'C HIVU 4 ) : MOT?ON by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution ^;o. 6?-1976. Seconded by Council- woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, atl vot�ing aye, I�ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 68-�976 - UIRECT?NG THE SALE APJD PUR�44SE C�F TE�IPORARY IhIPROV[MENT e MOTION by Cou��cilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution i�e. 6�3-197n. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF THE APPOINTMENT: CABLE TEL�VISION CO'r1MISSION (REPLACING NAfJCY WRUBEL): Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if there were any other vacanries. Mr. Qureshi, the City Manager, responded that this was the only one. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the appointn�ent af Edward Kaspszak to the Cable Television Commission to fill the une;�7ired term of Nancy ldrubel. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES: MO'fION by Coun�ilwomari K.ukowski to approve the licenses as submitted and on f;le in the License C1erk's Office. SeGonded bv Councilman Hamernik. Upon a ��oice vote, all voting aye> Mayor Nee declared the motiari carried unanir�ously. i �� ' � � ' � � � � ; � � , � �. � i I . � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 26, 1976 PAGE 9 ESTIMATES: , Smith, Juster, Feikema Suite 1250 Quilders Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Representation by Ronald L. Haskvitz in the Police Pension - PERl1 Suit $ 431.15 bteaver, Talle & Herrick 31G East Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 For Services Rendered by Virgil Herrick, City Attorney, . for June, 1976 $1,501.50 h10TI0N by Councilman Starwalt to approve the estimates as submitted. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS: MOTIO�d by Councilman Hamernik to pay the Claim No's. 15837 - 16055. Seconded by Ceuncilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votiny aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. AQJOURNMENT: 'i�10TI0N by Councilman Hamernik to adjourn the meeting. Seconaed by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P1ayor Nee declared ±he motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City CounciT of July 26, 1976 adjourned at 10:16 P.1�1. Respectfully submitted, Dorothy C. Green William J. P�ee Council Secretary Mayor Approved: i � � ' �I ' 1]R THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR hiEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 2, 1976 The regular meeting of the Fridley City Counc,il of August 2, 1976 was called to order by Mayor Nee at 7:42 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee welcomed the audience and invited them to join with the Council in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Hamernik, Councilwoman Kukowski, Councilman Starwalt and Councilman Fitzpatrick. MEMBERS ABSEN7: None PROCLAMATION: . NAMING AUGUST 19, 1976 -"YOUTH VOLUNTEER REC06NITION DAY": Mayor Kee read the proposed Proclamation aloud to the City Council and the audience. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt the Proclamation, naming August 19, 1976 as "Youth Volunteer Recognition Dzy." Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice ,vote, a�ll voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JULY 19, 1976: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the minutes of the Fublic Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council of Ju}y 19, 1976 as submitted. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: . Mayor Nee added one item to the agenda: the appointment of a Council representative to the Youth Center Commission to the Board of Directors which vaould be a temporary appointment. Councilman Starwalt further commented that he would like to conunent on the Surburban Rate Authority later in the meeting, regarding action to be taken. Mayor Nee then stated that the consideration of licenses for the Jaycees for their carnival would be discussed later in the meeting. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Council- woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Mr. Ed Johnson, 625 Dover Street, Fridley, a representative from the Fridley Jaycees, stated briefly that there would be a carnival on August 23rd throuqh the 29th behind Frank's Nursery at Osborne Road and University P.venue Avenue and would like the City to waive license fees and clean-up matter. He mentioned that the Jaycees have hired a garbage company to pick up daily and be responsible for clean-up. Also, he wished to obtain beer and food licenses. , Mayor Nee stated that this matter would come up later in the meeting when licenses were discussed and that it was not necessary for Mr. Johnson to stay around. He asked if the Council had any question regarding this, and there was no response. 1 � i O REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 2, 1976 OLD BUSINESS: ORDINANCE N0. 620 - AMENDING THE 7.ONING CODE, CHAPTER 205.101 WHICH 9 17u PAGE 2 D CHANGE TO A PER�4I Mayor Nee stated that this makes bar and tavern licenses permitted in C-2 and C-2S and that a public hearing was held on the first reading. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 620 and adopt it on the second reading, and publish. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FOR TRAIL SYSTEM fOR ISLANDS OF PEACE: Mayor Nee asked Mr. Richard Sobiech, Public Works Director', to present this matter to the City Council. Mr. Sobiech responded that an application could be made to the Oepartment of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, for certain trail-way improvements. Such application was prepared by the City of Fridley on behalf of the Islands of Peace to further improve and develop the trail system. He then referred to the second attachment in the appiication, stating that the total amount of money is y23,850 of which sixty-five percent (65%) would be funded by the Department of PJatural Resources, and thirty-five percent (35%) would have to be locally funded. He stated various items would be needed, i.e. black top, curbing alonq the t�ails, hand rails along the trails, etc., and other certain facilities would have to be provided. He further stated that if the City of Fridley were totally funding the operation, the amount would be $15,500 or sixty-five percent (65%) of the $23,850. Mayor tdee then asked. Mr. Sobiech if the materialsproposed to be purchased exceed the amount of the grant. He stated that it is intended to fund thirty-five percent (35%) of the share through labor. Mayor Nee asked if the material costs exceed sixty-five percent (65%). Mr. Sobiech responded that he was not sure and that perhaps Mr. Ed Wilmes could elaborate on the subject. Mr. Wilmes, 6350 Riverview Terrace N.E., was asked by Mayor Nee what the dollar purchase value of the materials was. Mr. Wilmes responded that it was $15,000 to be spent on materials and the balance � will be on labor. Mayor Nee then questioned whether that sixty-five percent (65�) ' of the $23,850 would be a cash grant. Mr. Sobiech responded that we would be getting j $15,500 in a cash grant and the question being the difference of $8,350. Mayor Nee : then asked if the plan �•�as such that labor would reach the �8,350 value. Mr. Wilmes ' responded it would. Mr. Sobiech mentioned that just by looking at the work that has � to be done, there is more labor to be done than anything else. Councilman Starwalt � �then asked Mr. Wilmes to be certa;n that a proper account be made regarding the � materials needed. Mr. Nasim Qureshi, the City Manager, stated that it was the City's ' responsibility since the grant would be made to the City. Mr. Wilmes commented that he, Mr. Jerry Boardinan, City Planner, and others would be meeting with the State's representatives tomorrow morning, August 3rd to discuss this matter further, a-s he feels they are making a very unusual application. Mr. Sobiech responded that to clarify matters, he could provide a further breakdown of the cost. Mayor Nee stated that the City Council would be interested in such a breakdown. Councilman Starwalt ther. comrnented that Mr. Jerry Boardman from the Staff has been authorized to work with this matter and he just wanted to make certain that Mr. Wilmes understood that the Staff is representing the City. Mr. Sobiech further clarified that on the front page of the application, the trail administrator is both the representative from the City and the representative from the Islands of Peace. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to approve the application fpr funding for the trail system for the Islands of Peace. Seconded by Councilman Starwait. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Hamernik raised a question regardin� this application and the application that was already approved. Ne questioned whether both applications were going to be Ll� �� r � ' , ' ' , ' ' � , � , ' ( I ' � 120 REGULAR COUPdCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 2, 197,6 PAGE 3 submitted or would ihere be a choice. Mayor Nee stated that what was submitted before is not in this same category. Mr. Sobiech responded that that was correct and an up-date of the request has been urged from '76 fiscal year to '77 fiscal year and � two applications will be made to the Department of Natural Resources and he felt confident that funding would be available for both. Mayor Nee asked for further discussion and there was no response. NEW BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF LOCATION fOR HOCKEY AND FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION STORAGE BUILDING Otd CITY PROPERTY: Mayor Nee asked who was going to discuss this matter and Mr. �ureshi commented that h� had the information from.the Parks & Recreations Commission, wherein the associations have shown a desire to build a storage building on public property which they want to use for their own purpose, the building beinn 24 x 30, two-thirds utilized by the association,and one-third utilized by the City. He further stated that approximately seven alternative locations could be considered and each location has a pro and con ' option. t•1r. Qureshi then proceeded to explain the options. 1) Delayin� the facility until completion of the Park Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Qureshi mentioned that if the Council did not wish to do this ; 2)To locate it on the south side of the north par•king lot with the addition of a warming house attached; 3) It would be attached to an existing wellhouse that the City has, being used for storane only and without restrooms; 4) Facility being located in some other location; 5) As shown, the map depicts a southerly parking lot where a building could be put; 6) Is a storage building � and 7) Mr. Qureshi stated that perhaps this whole complex needs a central building and it is hoped that if the company has a plan that this storage facility could be � included into that total plan. Counr_ilwoman Kukowski discussed the urg�nce of restrooms. �r, Qureshi stated that Mr. Chuck Boudreau, Parks and Recreation Director, is meeting this same evening with the Sports Association and there was the possibility that he may be in attendance before the Council meetinq was over. . MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to table the matter to either later on this evening or next week. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatricl:. Unon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. (The item is discussed again latter in the minutes.) CONSIDERATIOfd OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISNING CHAPTER 602 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "BEER LICENSING"AP1D REPEALI�lG THE PRESENT CHAPTER 602 OF SAID CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY: AND AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTIOPJ 11.10 Of SAID CODE RELATING TO FEES: Councilman Fitzpatrick questioned whether there has been any chan�es in substance. Mr. Virgil Herrick, the City Attorney, then commented on two points concerning the ordinance. First, a provision that fur new "on sale" applications, a hearing would be held and secondly, we have written in that for suspension of licenses, a hearina would be held and that would have to be done. He further stated tliat he started with a model ordinance that the lea,ue put out and then took our old ordinance and made ' certain that all of the substance portions of that were included in a language slightly different. He felt that this was a considerably better ordinance and does not to the best of his knowledqe, delete any of the requirements that we have. Mayor Nee then made reference to Section 602.08 sub-division �, questi�ning whether a grocery store is a beer store. P1r. Herrick stat2d that there has been discussion whet�er beer store should be used and perhaps the term tavern would be better incorporated in this. He further explained that first of all, it is from the league's , model ordinance and secondly, the lanquaae that they use other than the label "beer store" is a definition of "on sale" and that is how he would interpret it. He further stated that he would, however, take this into consideration when it comes back for a second reading. �I I REGULAR COUNCIL MEETIN6 OF AUGUST 2, 1976 1 ?�1 PAGE 4 Mr. Qureshi then asked if some of the beer places might have some entertainment and if we had any control over that. Mr. Herrick replied that it was his understanding that the only control we have over that is in the tavern ordinance and that would ! be rewritten as it was not in the greatest form. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the ordinance on the first reading and waive the reading. Mr. Herrick said he had another comment to make; he said in that the Planniny Cormnission had presented that other modified form of our present ordinance after doing some work on it, it might be well to let them take a look at this. Mayor IJee then stated that there was no urgency on this. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that it could be referred before the second reading and he would like to add that to his motion that this be referred for reviewal by the Planning Commission. Councilman Starwalt stated that I�e would recommend such a procedure and made reference to Section 602.13 Investigation Fee. He inquired of the �35.00 investiyation fee as to whether this is sufficient to cover the City's cost in view of some of the other changes made. Mr. Marvin 6runsell, the Finance Director, suggested that perhaps a public hearing would be necessary for the new applicant. Mr. Herrick then stated that for new applicants on "on sale" on�y there should be a public heariny and this investigation fee should be sufficient to cover the cost of the police investigation. Councilman Starwalt then referred for comment to Section 602.11, Sub-divis�ion 1 He,did not particularly like the lanyuage used and suggested tha* the Planning Commission review this as well. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to waive the readirg and adopt the ordinance upon first reading and for the Planning Commission to�take a look at this ordinance and the tavern ordinance and if an up-date is required, to forward it to the Staff. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a veice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 69-1976 - APPOINTMENT AND CONFIRMIIJG EXISTII�G APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY CONiMISSIONS FOR THE YEAR 1976: � MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution f�o. 6y-1976. Seconded by � Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, t�ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OLUTION N0. 70-1976 - ITION Tb THE 10 MILL SSITY FOR AN ADDITIONAL TAX LEVY IN �Y' THE CITY CHARTER SPECIFYING THE IV SAME AfVD ALSO CALLIiVG A PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Nee stated that the City Charter requires such public hearing if there is an indication that we are going to exceed 10 mills and in the last fifteen or twenty years, we always have. Therefore, a public hearing should be set for September � 20th, 1975. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt Resolution No.70-1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the , motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 71-1976 - AUTHORIZING AIVD DIRECTIiVG THE COM�INI(�G OF SPECIAL ASSESSh1EfVTS ON LOT 24, BLOCK 8, AND LOT 25, BLOCK 8, HYUE P�1RK ADDITION: ' MQTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution fdo. 71-1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Nayor Nee declared the motian carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 72-1976 - AUTNORI7_IIJG AND DIRECTIiVG THE COh1BINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMEIJTS ON LOTS 27, BLOCK 7, AND LOTS 28, AND 29, E3LUCK 7, ONAWAY ADDITION: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 72-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P1ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . ��' , , c i i '� '� �I �1 I � i � i ' 1 `L2 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 2, 1976 -1976 AUTHORIZING AND DI �JUITOR'S SU[3UIVISIOW td0�. CREEK ESTATES ADDITION: PAGE 5. MOTI�N by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution No. 73-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 74-1976 - AUTNORIZING AND DIRECT.fJG THE COM�I�JING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOTS 16, AND 17, BLOCK 2, AND LUTS 18 Ai�D 19, BLOCiC 2, Oi�AWAY ADDITION: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 74-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTIO�d �0. 75-1976 - AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTIN6 THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL 240, PART OF LOT 14, AUDITOR'S SU6D PrISION IVO. 123: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt Resolution No. 75-1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor I4ee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTIOP� N0. 76-1976 - AUTHORIZING THE CHANGI'!G OF THE 1976 BUDGET APPROPRIATIUNS WITfiIN THE 6ENERAL FUfdD SIGNS : Mr. Qureshi stated that this request was before Council regarding the inventory of all the City signs and that 90% federal funding would be available. Mr. Sobiech, the Public Works Director, stated that there wil� be an increase of appiroximate]y 15% to 20% more sicns. Councilwoman Kukowski then asked for the explanation of the "Advisory Speed" sign, and Mr. Sobiech ex.plained it. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Reso?ution No. 76-1976 which will allow the City to participate in the federally funded traffic warning and regulatory sign replacement program. Seconded by Councilwoman �;ukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A RE UEST BY MIKE 0'BANI�ON TO P.EVIEW PREVIOUS AGREEMEIVT (HEATHER NILLS 2ND & 3RD ADDITIONS: Mr. Sobiech, the Public Works Director, proceeded to discuss htr. 0'Bannon approaching the City regarding his escrow requirements for Heather Hills Second and Third Additions. Mr. Sobiech further stated that Mr. 0'Bannon requested a reconsideration in reviewing the Agreement. Councilman Starwalt asked if the costs that Mr. 0'Bannon submitted were reviewed and reasonable. Mr. Sobiech responded that they were. Councilman Starwalt further asked about the possibility of fhe pending area creating ' ' any problems. Mr. Sobiech responded that it would not. He further questioned the $800 per average lot size representing the average cost of providing storm sewer services and wondered if any future needs for escrow should be reviewed. According to Dtr. Sobiech, there was no necessity for this. � ' , � ,, ' Mr. 0'Bannon then arrived at the meeting. Mr. Qureshi, the City Manager, asked Mr. 0'Bannon if there was a problem of any water smelling or danger to children> and he responded no. Councilman Starwalt then asked if he understood that if there were clog-up problems, the entire area would be assessed. Mr. 0'Bannon acknowledged that it was understood. Mr. 0'Bannon then asked if he could possibly have permission tc proceed with the companies that are involved to be bonded with the City, to begin the Third Addition , of Heather Hills. • Mayor Nee stated that he did not need Council approval. Mr. Sobiech stated that the plan has already been approv�d. � � REGULAR CUUNCIL MEETING OF AU6UST 2, 1976 113 PAGE 6 ; MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to reconsider the previous agreement and concur with the request to remove the 5800.00 per lot escrow requirenient from Heather Hills Second and Third Additions, due to the zact that the developer is providing total storm sewer facilities within the referenced plats. Seconded by Council4�oman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. a LICENSES (INCLUDING FRIDLEY JAYCEE LICENS[S : MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to appro•de the licenses as presented and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye> Mayor Nee declared the moti�n carried unanimously. Mayor Nee stated that it would be in order to consider the licenses for the Jaycee carnival. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to approve the Jaycee licenses for the carnival and waive their fees. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS: MOTI�N by Councilman Sta�°walt to approve the payment of Claim No's. 16056 - 16161. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukbwski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. COt4MUNI CATI ON : RE UEST FOR TEMPORARY SIGN FOR A 24-HOUR STYLE-A-THON QY "CREATIVE HAIR, INC." HOLLY SHOPPING CENTER : r10TI0N by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive letter. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Ms. Valerie Hachow, P1anager of Creative Hair, Inc., 6574 University Avenue N.E., spoke on behalf of Creative Hair, Inc. She stated that they have volunteered the shop and the women who work there,and they would be donating theii° time and talent for a 24-hour national Style-a-thon beginning August 15th> 1976. The total proceeds of the event will go to St. Jude's Children Research Hospital. Councilman Starwalt asked if there were any fees involved? Ms. Hachow stated that she paid the fees. Also the permit fee has been paid. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to grant the request for the sign being put up on August 15, 1976 on a temporary basis. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. APPOINTMENT TQ `lOUTN CENTER 60ARD OF DIRECTORS: Mayor Nee stated there was to be considered by Council this evening, the appointment of Carroll Kukowski to the Special Project Committee for the Youth Center. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to accept the appointment of Carroll Kukowski. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY: Councilman Starwalt gave a brief discussion regarding the Suburban Rate Authority, of which he is a member. He stated that their regular meeting was insufficient in number to take some action on an item, so a special meeting was held to poll the cities in attendance as to whether or not the administrative costs for the fiscal year 1977 for the Suburban Rate Authority activities should be borne by the cities. He further stated that the matter will be on the Counc�il agenda at the next regular metting. , l `� � �.., REGULAR COUNCTL MEETING OF FUGUST 2> 1976 PAGE 7 FURTNER DISCUSSION REGARUI��G LOCATION FOR HOCKEY AND FQOTQALL ASSOCIATION STORAGE BUILDING: ` � T Mayor Nee asked if there was any other business and at that point, Chuck Boudreau> Parks and Recreation Director, had just arrived and was asked about the storage building for the Hockey and Football association v�hich had been discussed earlier in the meeting. Mr. Boudreau explained that he just left the Recreation Project Committee meeting and was unable to attend the Football and Hockey Spoi�ts Association meeting. Mr. Dick Lombard, 6321 Monroe Street N.E., then discussed the proposed storage buildiny and commented that what was in the agenda was initially what he had to discuss. Mayor Nee, after some discussion, stated that this matter will come up for more discussion at next week's meeting ar,d at that time,hopefully, Mr. 6oudr�eau will have something worked out. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to table the matter until the next regular Council meeting, August 16, 1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: ' MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adjourn the meetiny. Seronded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a veice vote, all voting aye; Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 2, 1976 ' adjourned at 10:03 P.M. Respectfully subinitted Dorothy C. Green Council Secretary Approved: William J. Nee Mayor � � 1� � ' �, '' — . - ' ' I I . � �`� �J / . � -/ 1 � 'j / I � ! � ' � ' ' ' • . � � ' . ' ��— � I ' ', � � . ., ;, a " a � � n E E o ° .�, 0+ O r � n� T• E 0 ,-., : �. r h7 Z A 00 �� „ N p n � n � n r � \ : ;� 4� ,1 i � i � a � , 1 � � ' ; � � i � ' i � � ' � '� � ; � � �> _ i t � 1 �1 � � MEMO T0: MEMO FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager Richard N. Sobiech,Public Works Director August 12, 1976 Innsbruck North Townhouses IV & V Innsbruek Village Please be advised that the 90 day requirement which provides that plats must be recorded within 90 days of approval has expired for the referenced plats. It is requested that the City Council consider reapproval of the plats at the Meeting of August 16, 1976. ' J) �S�jlll � II � i 1 ��2 34 , REGULAR COUNCIL MFFTING OF �PRIL 19, 1976 PAfE 9 1 • MOTION by Council Starwalt to table the first reading until the Council gets a report from the Charter Commission. Seconded by Councilr�oman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, t•tayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATIOP! OF Fi�J/1L PLAT SUQDIVISIO� PS �76_0 NNSBRUCK P�ORTH TOb1PlHOUSE IV A�ID , � V, AtrD APPROVAL OF TOr;NlIOUSE DEVELOPi�1EtJT Ol~� ' The Public 4lorks Director stated the Plannin� Con,nissiun did i>ecommend aoproval � with certain stipulations, and in working a�ith Darrel Farr a letter of understandinq and agreement has been viorked out and with certain stipulations that have to be met. The Public l•Jorks Director then read the stipulations in the ietter from Darrel Farr of April 19, 1976. � I ' The Public 4lorks Director said ttr. Farr realizes that prior to the final approval of the plat that certain items would have to be received by the City, and one of them is the ease�nents for the public 1•iall:�•,ay that is adjacent to the lake in the 4th Addition. This would provide the City with tlte ownership of the existinq r�alkv�ay that is presently around ihe public end of the park. The second is a performance bond for the exterior development; the liphtin�, tennis courts, and recreational facilities. The City reouires a cnpy of z?1 deed restrictior,s and anreement� be*�•1.en Oarre', F.:.•r and the Townhouse Associaticn. Also required is a 7-foot v�alkaiay to narallel the North Innsbruck Drive to Silver La{;e Road, and to try to cope a�ith the traffic problem. Tlie performance bond �•rould also call for the construction of an additicnal traffic lane at the Silver Lake Road to ease the access. A maintenance bor�d of �5,000 to insure the maintenance of the streets. The Public 4:orks Dir�ctor enumerated other stipulations, and stated these were the basic outlines of understandiny. � f40TIUt� by Ccuncilman Star��ralt to approve the Final Plat Subdivis�on PS `76-01 `=� Innsbruck f��crth To�•;nhouse IY and V, and �pproval of Tos�nhouse De��elopmer.t 'T =76-Q1 . Seconded by Counciiv,�oman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinn aye, Pla,yor "lee cleclared the motion carried unanimously. The group of ciLizens that met on the Innsbruck matter came bacE: into the Council room to give the results of their meetinq. P1TIPlU�D PUBLIC NEARI(JG AP�JD COt;SIDER;1iI0tJ OF FIf7AL PLAT SUQDIVISIO,J P.S. �'76-02, IJS6ZUCK VILLAG� P,tvD TOI�,'P�NOUSE DEVELOPi1ENT OF 100 U(vIiS, T'-`76-02, BY DARREL F�. FARP. N ; OR I��1�S6RUCK VIL htayor Mee stated the item now beinq considered is i;he Final Plat Suudivision No. 76-02 and To�vnhouse Development T r76-02 for Innsbruck Villaqe. Dir. Farr stated that one of the horneo�•aners has a list that has been aqreed u^on. Gary Samuel said.they had arrived at somev�hat of an anreement, and it may not be the perfect answer. The City offered to make a couple of cor!i�romises, ►•:hicFi helps. First of all, the Far•r Corporation has agreed to n!ove the units back a certain distance. There ti•ro:�ld be one-way lane enterinn, and eriernency vehicles could come up the►•e. The Farr Corporation iias agreed to do whatever soddinq or landscaoing may be necessary to keea the area, Arthur Street and l��est Eiarvarian, developed aesthetically. Discussion ensued on the various aspects of tlie a�reement in relation to streets, angles, etc. MOTION by Councilman StarN�alt to close the Public Ilearina and apnrove the final Plat Subdivision P.S. �76-02 and To�ti�nhouse Developrient T�/6-�2, but sub.ject to all the agreements and the five stipulations. Seconded by Council�•roman Kuko��ski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, �iayor Nee declared tlie n:otion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee thanked the audience and Pir. Farr for a reasonable canpromise. The City Manager said that it is encouraqinct to see the people aetting tonether and solvin9 problems, and the City would be qlad to help in any wav that it can. • If any one wishes t'o see any documents or plans, they should call the Public 4lorks Directo►• and he will make tiiat information available to them. 2� �� ,. .. 'v . �» ,�� L� ; • �l�v tY ,...,... ii I ,y .,' �I k'.�i� ;.:i�'i� . �,.G� ,1 `1 I ':4 . � .� r � � �i �i . v ._� :' �, � �4'r � � � � � . . , � `�'' ,� !�!� ` � �`G7 � , >. � ,� i�`�ii �. INNSBRUCK NORTII TOWNIlOUSF IV $ V ADDITIqN P.S. #7G-01 ., � �, � S!1•�7F. i�h�i 1� � � �//!� t \ .�• �� . II', (.l i��n rl.i�'T� �• 1 `. �' ; "��,--'7.^ /.: ..._._�jr'� �� , , 1 ;!' " • .i ,�t ,a � , _ __...,,_,_., ,.___.;':a'", i , '"• ��1 � . . � �—'''�" '" ^Z'--" +' ..----"""""" . � � s .1 �"`" '' } � ' �. } i � � :'.:== ' �� ' -- ' e �" � t 3 � ti� a �� b a _��•--� �'' 'f: �, - V pi�'"+j�;'.k�'!_+ .'�.•*' �1'ei ` ,�s tau ✓.;.b'.T �i �.t i r _` . i„ • � �� ' / ? .`:; ,,.v�_ a t� _�, � ` � ''°:t 'r t.,� .l�� 1; ' n f, (� V\ i:; e . . M, `� ' � .. ' .r� � � -� - .;-E6;• . oL "_ 1 6 . � < `+i � / '�'� `;� 'y \ �' _ - ' f �� ..v� � , F i � ;;� � � 4�': --� a °`� � .r -r-� .' t �' / 1 '1' k '.� ,� t � �-' ,Y <�-e�, (1�,•, F � � _ i �. , � � : r , y'L i / � . I ��i. ) 4J <: , � � � . �,;. . � •� � . . : L ..i /�j 'a� .i- ...> { t, �� ^e,i,/' �� _ J '�, !' ��.t '!T`S f \rr'r;F:� ��1� �� l�i '• �_ : ri rt: � �� - c t. � l(.:)� � �r� 2B .F �d7� 1 . '2 `L ! � �� , �� _. ,i.r , . • •� � �!, (? `,-.` v � � / � 4: � • �. ' � . , t �� ,�i �s `, ...� � �, � x—. J .�a'S �X, J/.��-�_ r � �' ,;, � ��,�r.��r . " f � ,' .� y /. , ` � � `� i .. i `� - . 4 �� ! .�r ��; ° 1 �, �-"f..r . . i - . 1 -�9 "'� ti/.� .£Z.,,,�-��r / ,a `q, r -.r c�_ � .i�. �'V T r17 ` q � � ! .;� 1�� V �1 1 i�.`i 't�d ��^� �� l. 1 -,V% ! . - �' F � "'�i �. �. i� .l �i�. �-` � _ . /1 � � �� i,� '- •? -- �J ° �,: �- f r � � - '. _ � i �:J� � •' � • � � ,' c . � I: 3 �c � j �"v 1 u ({� ^ �c� t . . . r�, {'rv-- / r Sfi Jr � \ � � i � ' � . y �� ,� � I � \ { ' '.� �., r � ` 7'-�� (� � r�,`.�i � . "l'� ��.��F7 �. ��C"'' �� 2+-�-�` �. i �.. • % -� ! 7 >!, i ' / 4 � � ('2 �l�•� Yy ` .(.Y ��.� � ��1` .�`_� t� � �=j, . c �> . � t � �.: _. 4 : ��,,�- @ c ._ . `"- � '. r ''� � �..�5 4'> •,� �4 t� v . �,"C. �ii��'4 �� .f,�, Q•-y�, ��F�mi..i41 � .�.+q4 ..yy� .. I � � ' � � '. _, ` - .,af;y j�� y A:: ti� n s�—J - / .L y✓ � .._r�JJi � � ..' . " � ._-..r�a.� ...._ F:t ': y f'`�`._� r__1 "��4,�� 4� � . � <W?'._+ A. � !/i � . � �. .:..� I�✓'> 7<< X.� � t- - � � ` g l • �'.,�ti ,� ,� '' t L � ? i 1��1a� � �� ' �" �U iH 1 ,. _ i --� r�.� '•:j•�.,:.1 t.G2 -� ry �P j'i + q{ 1�..�..; ey�� ._ t',..� . �. -_�� `}E ;. � .. %!i-? �Yi 1'r.. ... � -.. i' I r � •. �- > � ( �? t . 2 `/ � ! � .i ��-/ / � . � � �'e �� '�• E� �-��L��'� � . �.,B� �C��'; !3 �I � �. '_i e� ��P' �+.`�f� . i ��'7.,, '� � :y .y-2i�:�"1 r` �1� �'�� ( �� -� ... � �.� i!=' . a: i . � �. ��3 y � � r . .-1L .�.'� ��tl 3 _- .�j A n�;,�tj�� : � , .� .,i�,_� . y�`.i� :• 1 �� o! , i - � � t f',`$� .,� 4 t �fi� � ..F��^-� �� y `� �� .:!'f �r..ys -ti (l � � 1 �_� ..r-J t � w; �- � �5 a �` ` `� °�� L � � r�- 9u, f • >� I . . _' '�i y �� t � 1 - � _.��'r : �- `' .A�- �\ . i � � �� 1. �• � ��.� -8j e 1 !-'-T � `.'` �' ^ w i.: 8 .�`� � �-_ g a .. a"; �� 3 r�� '� i. � � .0 ! �- I � : �J '--.''_._ ' « �z!_ 7 �R v �"-� a 2 ' c� � � � � ;% � r...,. `p� ; �=, .I E � ' � `� q�� +a i e ,� , ; S y. " �i � EOT / � � �C�� s�.io J , ►•''.. ' � f �3', � � �;,. -�� `a✓.;�a ,��,�. ,�-2 �;� �-,�s,,, �y . _ L`� �--- , i `. - —� f _,.,.r/ r � _.__y - :�''�i' � .i ._. '` �' _.. . -'- .��' ,Q �� a � .=7, ;,� iS"t:i�•�, ! - --•<i<,e--- '.�---�_ . _ _� N�_ � � �{ 1\ eQ tia ti•, •� i" � `r �` � ..� � � � ,r .osti,, - �� N', c.� o�rrtor ,a i`_• � ��; 4y . 6�.li}✓°� (-�v^ h �;� 4��a k Isn�x±.�t� 4 ¢ o ��-- � � !`_.' `. k `� '� 41 �.4� ?� = Y� ,__., J s' ,'_i!. s��-_-_. � �. o . - G'��.� 1 \ �'�` -, y., :6'"' .�E.� .. `, �'.'�1 � � ' . '� : _ .�; � , .: . � o --.•_,,:� , P� ' � 1 �� '•�..."'"- � ; 4 �._ _ - ' _ . f ' 1 .�... ; <. t -, _•�. _ � : -1�ti1 - ; .�, . ---.;_ . _ � � ; �. � . . ' -'l= ,,. ,,'.~�--``"`s,s;•... `� - _ ' - _ � � _= y'�._ ,T' �5��. ~^ ` 1 . ,�.•,: ° � - _` __ '..,.r _ _ .` , '�M` - �, \� � • .,,,�.,��yr v...l Q �� . h i � �r f � '�- :i '�� \ - • . --,�.� "':� -�_, ° ,•"r �� •� _ t',e� `- �1 .i ; ... :. . -�..� . : i• • �,r� . r v-.' � e � 6'• ' 1 r � � � . � ;�. � '':a�� ` � � 'M` . r � . �` • • v � ' ; ,� °P' .,, N i . ' - . �� . , - ' . . ' . .•. � . ... _. �^. ,+:` '•` C�,,;• 6( r W„#' o� � `� _ •' ' � � �� . h � 1I ! �` � ,�i .! .� .� � . J. .. , t • �' ' ~ �� ♦ ♦ \" Isr � 1 � . (�. �e ::..:• � � `�r . .. y f! �4� �N C,•�.^� � r`� �' '' �� '. � • ' �. /i �,t, b b' .. � :.�,\� h � � "s � ,`, v �rti ,{St ,`:''.� !i .4� I.` +i _ ..� . M . y S S, t 3� I� � �� REGULAR COUNCIL P4EETING OF APRIL 19, 1976 PAGE 9 MOTION by Council Star��alt to table thc first reading until the Council gets a report from the Charl:er Commis�ion. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, F1ayor hee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSID[RATIOP! OF FINI'�L PLIIT SUGDIUISIOfJ P$ 776-01 ItlNSQRUCK P�ORTH TQ41PlHOUSE IV At10 V, AhD APPROVAL OF TO!yNfIOUSE� DE'![LOPPiENT T#76-01 : The Public 4lorks Director stated ihe Planning Conu�iission did recommend aoproval . with certain stipulations, and in workin9 with Darrel Farr a letter of understandinq � and agree,nent has been �•�orked out and ti•�ith certain stipulations that have to be met. The Public t•Jorks Director then read the stipulations in the letter from • • Darrel Farr of April 19, 1976. � The Public blorks Directer said �ir. Farr realizes that prior to the final approval of th� plat that certain items would have to be reeeived by the City, and one of them is the easements for the public v�alka�ay that is adjacent to the lake in the Sth Addition. This vrould provide the City a�ith the oti•mership of the existinq.walkH�ay that is presentl�� around the ��ublic end of the park. . The second is a per.formance bond for the exterior deveicpment; the liqhtinn, tenr.is courts, and recreational fac�ilities. � . The �ity requires a cepy of all deed restrictions and agreements bett�teen Darre? Farr and the To�•m house Association. Also required is a 7-foot r�alk�iay to parallel the North Innsbruck Drive to Silver Lake Road, and to try to cope with the traffic • problem. The performance bond r�ould also call for the construction of an additional � traffic lane at the Silver La{:e Road to ease the access. A maintenance bond of $5,000 to insure the maintenance of the streets. �J � . ' r� � The Public horks Director enumerated other stipulations, and stated these were the basic outlines of understanding. MOTIOPJ by Councilman Starwalt to approve the Final Plat Subdivision PS r76-01 Innsbruck Plorth Toti�mhouse IU and V, and approval of To�•,nhouse Develorirent T=76-�1. Secorded by Councila:oman Kuko�•rski. Upon a voice vote, all votin4 aye, tia,yor `lee declared ti�e motion carried una�imously. The aro«p of citizens that met or. the Innshruck matter came back irto the Council room to give the results of their n;eetin�. CONTItlUFD PU[�LIC HE/IRIPIG F1(iD CONSICERATIOhd OF FIf1AL PLAT SUaDIVISI P.� , I�dNS[iRUCK I�ILLAGE APJD TU'.•;i;fiOUSE D[VELOf'��le�f�T OF lOG !�l�IIS, T:76-02,O��RP. DEVELOPt•iF1�T CORPORATION FOR Ii;"�S3r;UCK VILLAG� Mayor �ee stated the item no•,r bein� considered is the Final Plat Subdivision No. 76-02 and To��mhouse Derelopment T t`76-02 for Inn�bruck Villaqe. Mr. farr stated that one of the homeovrners has a list that has been dQi'P.P.(I upon. Gary Samuel said.they had arrived at some�-ihat of an a�reement, and it r:iay not be the perfect answer. The City offered to �nake a couple of cem�romises, �:�hich helos. First of all, the farr Corporation has agreed to �nove the units back a certain distar�ce. There 4rould be one-��iay lane enterinn, aiid ei��er�ency vehicles could come up there. The Farr Corporation has agreed to do t•�hatcver soddinq or landscaping muy be necessary to keep the area, Arthur Stf•eet and l•lest t�arvarian, developed aesthetically. Discussion ensued on the various aspects of the a�reement in relation to streets, angles, etc. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to close the Public Nearina and apnrove the Final Plat Subdivision P.S. "76-02 and Tot•mhouse Develop��ent T,'-7F-�Z, but sub.ject to all the agreements and the five stipulations. Seconded by Councilti�roman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting ayc, tiayor Nee declared the metion carried w�animously. Mayor Nee thanked the a�dience and �ir. farr for a reasonable compromise. The City Ptana9er said that it is encouraginn to see the people c�ettin� toaether and solving problems, and the City would be ��lad to hel� in any way that it can. lf any one wishes to see any documents or plans, they sl�ould call the Public 4lorks Oirectur and he will irake that information available to them. . _ .. _ ._...--- • — _. __. _ .. . .. . . ; �� t � � � � � l �' � � � ♦ • 1 � 1 � � • ` . ,, � t" . � ..�. ._� �. . ��. j � ::`' � �� :. `2 �:��ti , . a.:,..r ; o ; •f v ��Se �� '� ., y.�i�' � aA ...�';�-_.. -� K ;: v v •. � ` . � __...-•-.•••-_- --...r �� r . �... � ' �` "�,��,...--.; ; 3�A_ � ._._ INNSBRUCK VILLAGE P.S. #76-02 • � i; � � 1� .. ��3� , � �.i,•..' �i ; ; ,� s�•- � ,i•r�;i (� i . ;�'• :�. '� . , ;'• � , '� • i ti� �� . --� -- ;�.:►------._..__! � --- , ; -.�.____.._------- I �: , �� . �v . � �` � � . '. � I`,• ' • •; . I �` . ,_..."� : ` �� "'�' ` � . , .� ; � • �. I �:2zzv1 � -' — '_' ,• .'.' �� -"'--'. � ,,' � 2/Y"� � �, ' � ?' "' - e • r . . a. � , �� ..� �' , �..� �-5..� '`^ ' , � ;, �� ... � � ` .. _� � 4 � � . • O i ,r . .. .._.. . __" "_"_""_" ' ._.. . � ' �ili R:.t � t . --r-..._____—'"'"_"'_"" �'` T7._._.._1u: . . ( �• ' .. . 5�oq � ' , . � .�JJ�,. � � I ` • � : t r�-i , z. i; � i�, : ' ' ' � � � �♦ �?.490% � ' ; 'l� � ` '� lJ ,�. I `�� i � ,�� ,0 �: � � � i ' _� 1 �i ; . \ C ` ♦ 1 V . � E � � . ` ` � � . `� ' , ; ,,� . ,•'- \ _-- • � � '• � � . . . ,� . � 1 i -j�r~.�—�'- •'` —.—_-- , I�..�_..._..�_. . ... ` ..�....... I'i:; �_+e�.::. � � Il '4'•• \ [`` ['`� ,' � ,' i .t 9n'' } �� Ci �? . , ' �' ~ �� ' 1��:'. �1.'♦ . '^ ` ��-•` 1�� JA•,� ' ••�., y � .' .i' '• � �` `i . ?h�} M�.��. •`•�• ` ^ � 1, .`;• r' / :\�;; � `%% ` �� . .` � Q � �` �` �� t . , ,t � �,,'� \`��r p! ,k'S' .ti�• �,' ��. � .._ C 6.i•�'. .a� .:`.-. ..:�. ... .._. •'�„� � tt��.��r`t ..' ,;� . ' • ,i (� t1{:�..� j`}1.}L��C ^�� " ' � 'r•, i , `` ��ti•� � .. � � r, � �"7 �� t� `� •' • . „ :, �.. .. _.___ ,:,---""�;�,,.�:, .. r.iv• .. � i {� � � —... �--T��'' ° ,:.�-=-:.�� - ' y?� - �� . ,�.'� ...� •'��i� • ± ` \• '• � .�! � w i•/ • . : ''y��' ��`��'S. tF. • '� V�� +' ,� � �..r6` ..� ' � � �'Inl��.��'�•, ^'•� �,`'1' � 1 �` . � ' j ' ' �' j 1 ' . .`.�. � ��r •.'v, •I,' .•f�V ��.� ,� Y � •`�.a. ` �� •�i� . � . , .�.,� :�.; � �. �' �, •K ; . ,, .�,,,f,/;. . i,; �, • � _� `',� ;1 '. � r �, �i r�; �' � j �• g1..",-� �' it � _ � r, i . �� t � � y � , � • ,� •,Jr4 , :., ., +}�f ._ ► .;: > . ,, .: ��, ,` _ ,:� •.. �� ,�+ C � I 1 .''� 1 ' , 1�...•. , , ,`r • ,, � • ""V .t'�� , i.,, `� '�' r � ) M . •• • � ` T . . ��` . — .a' •6Y' �,t, 't~ :.f1f�J�.". . • :"�` ' ;� �.� .�,�, � � •,�' � : . � � � � � � r.� . ;+ w �1_ 1' i 1 7' , " , : r ' i �I �,.' � ^ `. • �� r .! i: � � .� `ti � � `,, f � � � ''' ` ,/." . , ,..•,, ;! ,'� � ' r �,,, ��' �1 � r' % � .. .. , _1:• , •` : C��'� � •?� • -- —;—•— ` � .�� f ('?�'I f��1•`��1 �, 'w ,r:�:N.� Y �",`;,,� *. � � ^� ��. � )' ; .I j i ,.. � . � � � � , -: �ti ,' �< , ,i,r� •� �,, } ,,., ` ► � � C c n y June 25, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Attention: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager Re: Alice Wall Plat and Development Gentlemen: After discussions with the Fridley City Administration, tiie Wall Corporation understands that due to a significant time l�pse since previous approvals, development of the referenced property rec{uires reapproval of the following two items: . 1. Alice Wall Addition Plat 2. Multiple (R-3) development and associated variances 1 In order to proceed with reappro•aal of the plat, the fol- lowing items will be provided prior to final recording of the plat: � � 1. 2. 3. 4. Execution Execution Execution struction Pavment of of attached agreement of attached sidewalk easements of attached petition for sidewalk con- the $8,000 park fee OncP the plat has been recorded, develoument could pro- , . ceed on the R-1 and R-3 zoned properties upon issuance of apUropriate buildin� permits and pavment of �15,000 of special assessments due on the Alice �Vall Plat for develop- ' ment of the R-1 properties. Before canstruction can proceed on the single family pro- � perties, the storm sewer. system niust be completed to the extent that no residences would be damaged by storm water runoff. To ensure proper development of the single family ' lots. it is understood that an. alternative to completing the entire storm sewer system as shown on attached utility plan sheet C-1, the following schedule could be followed: ,� I. Construction could begin immediately after filine the plat on Lots 1-6. 22 �, 23. Block 1, Alice Wall Addition. . ' ' . I� � 4A Mayor �, City�Council -2- 6/25/7G 'i � 2. Prior to any further single family construction, the outfall pipin� from tne pond to the existing storm sewer system in 7th Street rnust be completed together with the grading required to 1) ensure pond capacity and 2) provide proper elevation for the properties abutting 7th Street. (See plan sheet C-1) 3. Completion of #2 above would allow single family construction to proceed on Lots 7-16, Block 1, Alice Wall Addition. 4. Completion of the storm sewer piping parallel to 63rd Avenue and the outfall from 63rd Avenue to tne pand (see plan sheet C-]_) would allow single family construction to proceed on Lots 17-21. � In order to minimize disturbance of 7th Street in pro- viding water and sewer services to the R-1 platted pro- perties adjacent to 7th Street water services will be in- � stalled two in a trench, on the property lines of Lots 5� 6, 7 F� 8, 9� 10, 11 � 12, 13 � 14, 15 F� 16 and a separate sanitary sewer service line will be constructed parallel to and adjacent to the west line of 7th Street to serve 1 Lots 5-16. An appropriate sanitary sewer easement will be ' dedicated to the City in order to allow access :;o the sanitary sewer Iine for future maintenance by the City. Plans and � specifications for the sanitary sewer construction will be pre��ared to City specifications and be subject to City appro- val prior to cunstruction of the sewer line. � r , �� , In order to proceed with the development of the apartment com- plex on the referenced property, please be advised that the following listed items are required by the City and have been incorporated into the final construction plans dated 28 February, 1975 (revised 8 April, 1975) submitted to the City for their review: 1. The total drainage system within the entire pro- perty will�be developed (Utilities plan - sheet C-1). 2. Garage stalls in excess of 1/3 of the total needed parking stalls have been provided (Site plan - plan sheet �-1), 3. Contractors have been instructed to preserve the heavy grove of trees in the northerly area of the pxoperty (Landscape and Roof plan - plan sheet LA-1). 4. Sidewalk will be installed on Sth Street for the R-3 � property and R-1 lot adjoining this property (Site �lan - plan sheet A-1) (to be revised to indicate sidewalk extension to 63rd Avenue). � ' 5. Landscaping plans (Landscape and Foof plan -plan sheets LA-1 � LA-2). Mayor F� City Council � ..> -3- 6/25/76 6. Interior garage wall will have two fire doors to allow £or passage from one side to the other (Garage plans, Elevations $ Details - plan sheet A-17) (.to be revised to indicate two doors). . 7. Parking will be a minimum of 5£eet off from the garage (separation will be by a 6 inch by l8 inch poured concrete curb) with low maintenance material. 8. The plans are for construction of an apartment com- plex which will consist of'60 efficiency units, 24 one bedroom units and 60 twa bedroom units. 9. The follo�ving listed recreation facilities will be provided: FW/jm a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) Outdoor swimming pool (plan sheet LA-2) Party room (plan sheet A-2) Picnic area (plan sheet LA-Z) (to be revised to include picnic area) Game room (plan sheet A-4) Putting gxeen (plan sheet LA-2) Interior walking paths (plan sheet LA-2) Tot lot (plan sheet LA-2) One tennis court (plan sheet LA-2) Yours very truly, i -.' , �J � � � � .� � `-"- '��red Wall, President tiVall Corporation � i , � � � , AGR��MENT Wall Corporation/City of Fridley Alice Wall Addition This agreement made and entered into this day of , 1976 by and between Wall Corporation, herein�r referred to as "Owners", fee owners of the proposed Alice tiVall Addi- tion, and the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WHEREAS, the Owners have petitioned the City to approve tne � proposed plat of. Alice Wall Addition and development of 23 single family (R-1) properties and a 144 unit apartment complex (R-3). � � , , ' �� , � � , ' � � WHEREAS, the City finds that the proposed platting and development will be in the public interest, welfare, and convenience to the people of the City of Fridley if the Owners agree to lay out, develop and maintain said platted property according to standards agreed to in advance by. the parties hereto. CONSIDERATION FOR THIS AGREEMENT shall be the a��roval of the fina' plat of Alice Wall Addition together with authori- zation to develop 23 single family residences and a 144 unit apartment complex (R-3). The Owners, their successors and assigns do hereby covenant and agree as folZows: 1. Pxovide a drainage pond on the said property as shown on the approved final plan which would receive the drainage from the adjoining properties and drain the sa.id property. The surface water will be stored in the pond during the rain and will be let through with an overflow into the existing storm sewer at Bennett Drive and 7th Street slowly after the rain storm sub- sides. The location of the permanent portion of the pond would not be any closer than 100 feet from any �road right of way lines. The design of the permanent portion of this pond would be based on the 5 year freauency (8.2 acre feet) with the temporary expansion of the pond to be designed for 50 year frequency (12.0 acre feet): and the limits of the temporary ponding around the time of the rain could extend into the R-1 platted lots. The water in the permanent pond would be pumped up to a fountain for aeration purposes to elimi- nate the stagnation effect of the water in the permanent pond. The bottom and the shoreline of the pond will be such that it is as maintenance free as practical and the �thole slioreline and the grounds around the ponding area will be landscaped. Any maintenance of the ponding area and adjacent areas shall be the responsibility of the apartmeiit complex. The design of the complete drainage and storm sewer system in this property shall be apProved by the City Engineering Department and 4C , I _ - - � I11 �� r i r � ' � �� ' ' � � Agreement -3- Wa11 Corp.iCity of Fridley IN WITNESS WH�REQF, the,parties heret � have hereunto set their hands this �• day .of �:r.t::.., -�_ , 1976. (Seal) STATE OF MINNESOTA) �ss �OUNTY OF ANOKA ) Wall o.rporation, � j ./ r- .�---�� . _ / ; �:-�-��, ,,% resident � � Vice President On this day of , 1976, before me, a Nota�y Public within and or said County, personally appeared and _ , to me known to^ e the persons described in, and w o executed the foregoing instru- ment and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. IN WITNESS tiVHEREOF, the parties hereto have hexeunto set their hands this day of __ , 197b. (Seal) STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS COUNTY OF ANOICA ) City of Fridley William J. Nee, Mayor Nasim M. Qures i, City I�ianager On this day of , 1976, before me, ' a Notary Public within and �or sai County, personally appeared tiVilliam J. Nee, Mayor and Nasim bi. Qureshi, City Manager, to me known to be the persons described in, and ., who executed the foregoing instrument and ackno�aledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. �, � 4E � ALICE WAI.L ADDITION �.� ,. r z � � ` .,. r'�� I � i_ ;_r-� ��• , ,\�J� �r•,rtn li.,. o� gM Ill^ �V, i I- l�J ltv�`\ , � \ � i..7 �F�., .^�', I.p. ` J ; � � r` n• �. I- � � � , �. u� � „ ��Il3�:::;�'��--i___-- EAST 4475i , = s�..4, _._._.. . . . , �, ___._— � � ,� ��i� ! 3i�;i �� .iQ �: ��iIS:i15SIFFl S1FiE.El .��„':1;:� . 1'. .. . -----) ,�' ��, '--- . �,-- � „- ; —r-------," _ - --- ••'-�, � � � ' , �t � - :, ; 'i, Nor�n« s� .rncr of � E V :t Nc i�'4 cf O � � t�eZS• 1/+ ot � Q � L I 3 'I/, '� -\�''�` \� 'ec. �i. ,-�. 30. i ' � _ _' . en> � i-� . ?9^. 2V � f�� j ry� . t_/ �J I° I� �'� I %-� i 1 L� ' I (� ja,' � � I \� L—] L�_ . �� t i— w < tt'' Z �_ �� V� I _ '� Ci 4 i 1 i. o w i.� '� w �`/�. ' � . - � �n M H � o (n �— o �r, z L�J - _� �' � . t� L'J LL" o l lY �'— � � r � x � l(% (1 � .. :�� ,� ��n ,- I i , S3 I21). r. �� ._ i.. �. . �� , �. , � r t �� i �,�.� � _;. �._� ., i� �`y-- i � � i_.i-�I��,i M'�� 4� p �Hr ;;'_. �.:,,,._ _ .., --f. ��' � ` . � . o —*- � „� � n> --==�-' ; 5 . , . 2 - - ., " u� \ � �� ` • ' Gr�.rayc d Uti:.:� F.,::'�e-.t - '�f,<.��.'� ,. Z \ / �\� • O `�� t••�, �,J r \� � '�,,, _._ ; `=>^ - 1- ---- -- M . - 'T J ; �, �..-. �a , .' . a ' � �..- r.:� �� '� " ._. -._ <..; . � �- ' , � �i :nsr 2i�.00 - - _ _ .._, _ . ' . �_8,�.-`,�E . -.5- ' _., _l \ .,2l. a� 1 _\ 1 /\ \ ,. �61 CO � ` `/'ep e � � � J � / `�` '__� o.� ��.,A � - _.�},:.J - 1��..IVIV....) 1 � ..11\�,�L Drain;c: 3 :. �.:y � - — ' -�' m .. � � � � � � . . e-- = , �� : . < _.__ -- . �.,. �-c5 g. - � „! / � � - ! _-1 - �°`'---- � w. ; � 1 53`:3 S! �» " ' O w O I � ' � ` - - W � .. .. �I � . �� . r :n .. L� � i • ti., �: . �� _ O � �° � �I , , _ e�� - . . , W. ,,° � . ., 2 4 �� ' '12 '' 4 _ _ �� I � z �' ,�u`-0 �•} `V � orJ�'= J - �'3 v, � � � "'� � ��l � `J " i � .. �- : �:a,� :� 6�,�� _ . 14 �� I 519'SJ�lJ��k � � I I` • � ��,�,. s �,:i.t, .�:..�, —i - - L�:: �t'.t. � J I . `�� ♦. � .A�l� � . ..� � i J,� .. ., , .,. --+ .. ---• � '� .�,6,. � ~ I M. 23 .�22 21 � 20 19 � li ; , ��' �- ! ,�• . . �� .. ._.�. `�.`_._t. � " - ..._�. .L� ' ` �\ . _ _ _ _ 6v�3 �3 tvEsy°`�?�33 11 ,� •'i3 Itl). � ,1�, - , I�� . /_ _. ._ _ __ _ _ -- - _ r -� (1 \) •� �� -� ii..) ._-. I' ,,.�� _�-��-� i-� r= � � . : _ .- t�; .'' ' �f , —7 /_. �•�j c.^' ; __ I _ ` I ^ r` r.�-;—� �� c. . � r, �� ' � I i-. i_; i_. �� ` 1 , I - � (."` � �.^ ^� � _ . f r � r �`•;/ � f ! � � � , . � l_ - � � �� `�/ t .1 , . ( � I � I -- � �', � � � - . .l � ` . .. :( .f a 0 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 28, 1976 Council Action Required Appeals Commission Meeting af July 13, 1976 Mr. P. Neururer, 390 57th Place ) Considered together ' Mr. J. Johnson, 380 57th Place ) �� :� Real Estate 10 Second Addition (Renamed HILLWIND ADDITION)P.S. ��76-06 Generally located at 941 Hillwind Rd. NE � 5 ' C' � � � �H1llLr:Y APPEAIS CUIfIt�lISSION MEETING JULY 13, 1976 MEMBF;RS PRFSENT: Alex Barna, Pat Gabel, Dick Kemper MEt•iBERS .ABSENT: Virginia Schnabel, Jim Plemel OTEiERS PH�;SENT: Ron Holden, Building Inspection Officer The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairperson Gabel at 7:29 P.M. APPROVAL Or' JUNE 29, 1976 APPEALS COMMISSION MT?�IUTES: � Chairperson Gabel st3ted that tris item would have to wait until the next meeting of-the Appeals Commission as nore of the members had received their copies of the minutes. � � �I � ' � � 5A MOTlON b,y Barna, secanded b,y Kemper, to table the approval of the June 29, 1976 Appeals Commission minutes until the next scheduled rneeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, thE motion carried unanimously. 1. TABLID: RE�UEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.065, (3,B) FRIDLEY C1TY COL'E, TO ALLO:•' TENANT OF�'-STREET PAHKING IN THE r'RUNT YARD Or AN EXISTING l�-PLEX, ZCNED R-2 ( T'vJ0 �'AMILY D�ti'ELLII�G �REAS }, LOCATED ON LO'1'S 1!� At�iD 15, BI�OCK 6, CITY VIE4J ADDITION, THE SAP•iE BEING 390 57TH PLACE N.E., 4�'RIDLEY, MINNr,SOTA. (Request by P4r. & Mrs. Peter Neururer, b501 7�t12 Avenue North� Minneapolis, Minnesota 551t28). 2. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.065, (3,B) r'RIDLEY CITY CODE, TO AI;LOW TElVANT OFF-STREET PARKING IN THE FRONT YARD OF AN EXISTING !t-PLEX� � ZONED R-2 (T?�0 FAMTLI' D!�r'ELLING AREAS), LOCATED ON LO'1'S 12 A1VD 13, BLOCK 6, CITY VIEW ADDITION, THE SANiE BEING 380 57TH PLACE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESUTA. (Request by Mr. & Mrs. James Johnson, 621 �3ennett Drive N.E., r'ridley, Minnesota, 55l�32 ) • ' AISO: Both these variance requests are also asking to be allowed an encroachment into City boulevard with a parking lot, as restricted in the City Code, Section 205.155, (3). , � �i� ' MOTION by Barna, seconded by Kemper, to open the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFr' HEPORT, 3g0 57th Place N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SF.�ZVED BY REQUIREriENT: Section 205.065, 3,B. No parking stall shall occupy any portion of the required front yard. Public purpose served by this section of the code is to reduce visual pollution in the front yard. � � P'KIDLFY APPFALS COR�'�!ISSTON MEETIN� OF Jl1LY 13, 7 97� PAGE 2 5 $ B. STATED HARDSHIP: Petitioner advised by the City Engineering Department that provision had aeen made to continue access to these existing stalls, but oiily contir�gent upon application and approval af the appropriate variance. C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFr' REVIEW: Depressed curbing was installed in the front of this 4-Plex to allow continued �arking in the froni yard by the Engineer- ing Department, because waitirig f'or the processing of this variance request �.�ould have been a very costJ.y delay in 1;he street construction. The owner was requested to obtain a variance, or the depressEd curbing would be replaced by regular curbing. The apartment has 3 two-bedroom and 1 single bedroom units, ��hich require a total of 7.5 parking stalls. The garage in the rear, facing �7th Avenue N.E., has 4 parking stalls. It is located !t0 ft. from the curbing on 57th Avenue wi.th approximately 10 feet of boulevard. This would possibly allow for parking in the rear driveway • without parking in the street right-of-Taay. (Those �rith two cars could park the second car outside, behind tneir garage stall). In addition, the !�-Plex apartment building r.ext door to the �ti'est is Lt6 feet from the building at 390 57th Place. This area could be used as a join't parking area to help al2eviate the front yard parking problem. L�iagonal parking with a drivewav from front to :^ear could be installed. This V�oul.d require a joint agreement with the neighbor to the YJest. In as much as the neighhor to the tidest is scheduled befnre the Appeals Commission witri a similar rea�;est at the next meeting, Staff recommends that the Commissicn discuss this issue, ar�d postpone a decisicn until both requests can be considered simultaneously. Staff feels that a viable alternative to this front yard parking can be worked out in tnis. case. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 380 57th Place N.E. A. PUl3LIC PURPOSE SERVED BY RE�UIREMENT: Section 205.065, 3, B, prohibiting , parking in the required front yard. Public purpose served by this section of the code is to reduce visual � pollution in the front yard. � B. STATED HARDSHIP: The petitioner was advised by the City E�gineering Depart- ' ment that provision had been made to continue access. to the existing parking stalls, but onl�• contingent upon application and approval of the appropriate variance. � � � � C. ADA4INISTRATIVE STAFF REVTEW: Depressed curbing was installed in the front of this 1t-Plex to allow continued parking in the front yard by the Flzgineer- ing Department, because waiting for the processing of the variance request would have been a very costly delay in the street canstruction. The owner was requested to obtain a variance, or the depressed curbing would be replaced by regular curbing. The apartment has three 2-bedroom and one , FRIDLi:Y APPFA� Cui°t�lI�SI011 M�ETING OF JULY 13, 1976 . I,� � � , � ppc�F, 3 5 C single bedroom units, which require a total of 7.5 parking stalls. The rcar of the lot, fronting on �7th Avenu? N.E., has ciepressed ciirbing and stalls to accommodate 4 cars.� 380 57th Place has no existing garage facilities. A majority of the tenants use the existing front yard parking stalls. . The area in the front yard, which is being used for parking, involves a 15.5 foot boulevard,. Staff pictures show that the entire 15.5 foot boulevard is being used for parking. Parking in a boulevard is in violation of the City Code, Section ?_05.15s� 3. It is a,pparent that in order to allow parking to continue in the boulevard, the r'ridley Cit,y Council would have to allow an encroachment into the boulevard for par4cing purposes, as *aell as approve a variance request for parking in the front yard. Attached please find a memo from Torn Colbert, Assistant City En�ineer, to Ron Holden, Building Inspection Officer, regarding the concerns of the Engineering Department in this matter. Staff feels that although this petitioner has less available space than his neighbor at 39� 57th Place N.E., in which to provide the required pa.rking, an alternative parking system could be arranged. A larger parking area in the rear would be one possible solution. A joint parking arrangement between the two buildings, incorporating diagonal parking, would be another. Staff feels that any and all altern.atives should be considered before granting the variance request. 1 Chairperson Uabel read the following memo to Ron Holden from Thomas Colbert dated July 9th, 1976 on the subject of variance requests at 390 and 380 57th place: � � � � In conjunction with tioard reviewal o£ the above referenced variances, some additional information has been derived for consideration in dis- position of tnese requests. Should the requests be denied, the City would replace the existing depressed driveway opening with a normal curb and gutter section at a cost estimated to be approximately $1�000. If the requests are granted, and front yard boulevard parking is allowed, a maximum encroachment onto the public right-ef-way allowed by the �gineering Division would be 10.5 feet. This would leave approximately 5 feet oi' boulevard behind the curb for sno�a storage and would insure against any potential for damage to parked vehicles by snow removal equipment. In addition, if' the above mentioned encroachment � Division strongly recommends that it be granted tion: � � is allowed, the �hgineering wi�.h the following stipula- "This encroachment shall be considered null and void should use of this encroached area be deemed necessary by Council action for any public utility, transitory, or otner public interest need. Upon nullification, reapplication shall.be required to renew existing variance and encroachment." ,� !�'x1llL�Y APP�:ALS CuNll�IIS5I0tv M�:�:'1'INU OP' JULY 13, 1976 YAti�: 4 5 D Mr. and rtrs. Peter Neururer were not at the meeting. Mrs. James Johnson was present to explain her request. . . �. t;hairperson Uabel explained that the owners of 390 57th Place were to be present so the two items could be handled together, but they were not in attendance. Sne asked how many cars the tenants had at 3�0 57th Place, and Mrs. Johnson said that tne two-bedroom units usually riad two cars and the single unit usually ane. Mrs. Uabel said then there would usually be seven cars there� ana Nlrs. Johnson said that was correct. P�rs. uabel asked if their property went over to the end of the ��ence� and Mrs. Jonnson replied that it did. Mrs. Gabel asked how wide the lot was, and Mr. nolden said that both the lots at 3�U and 390 were t�0' wide. Mrs. Gabel asked if they had considered doing something in the back to provide more parking, and N,rs. Jonnson said tney hadn't as most people preferred going in the front door. Chairperson c�abel said she noticed there would be some trees lost if an alterna- tive parking situation was created. rir. �iarna said that the trees were quite old, and there would be some hedges lost also. He added that there were many children� on bikes, etc., in that area. Mr. Holden asked how close the trees were to the West property line, and Mrs. Johnson replied they were almost right to it. Mrs Uabel noted that the buildings appeared to be well kept up� and said it would be nice, aesthetically speaking, if there could be parking in the rear. Mr. Holden said at the last meeting he had suggested a parking area between the two buildings, but Mrs. Johnson said she didn't believe the c�ther owner would be agreeable to that as he would be giving up a lot of nrcperty. She added that there would be no yard area. Mr. Barna asked if.tne renters were usually young couples, and Mrs. Johnson sa�d they were usually youno people just starting out. in life. Mr. Barna noted there was qui-te a slope between the tt•ro buildings� also. I�r. Holden agreed, and said it was less than an ideal solution. He. asked if Mr. Neururer had contacted r1rs. Johnson, and she replied he had not. Mr. Kemper stated he felt there were two choices: 1) The variance could be denied, and if that decision was upheld by the Council then regular curbing would be put back in front of 380 and 390 a.nd the people V�ho live there would find places to park in the street or behind the b�ailding. 2) Leave the depressed curbing in front to permit off-street parking, and incorporate the provisions stated in Mr. Colbert's letter. In this event, part of the solution would be to insist that some sort of curbing be installed in front to delineate or define a parking area. � Mr. Barna stated that 380 was not unique in the City of �'ridley as he had driven around and found about iive other !�-Plexes �rith similar oroblems. He stated that one he had seen didn't even have a drivewa,y in back, and a number of other � buildings in the City are using front parking facilities now. He said that his question to himself was could they grant one variance because of hardship and not another one because there was a road in back. Mr. Kemper suggested that each hardship should be weighed on its own merits. Mr. �iarna said that they would be � setting a precedent, and his personal feeling was that in a properly arranged front yard where there was enough room, it wouldn't be objectionable. He continued that in this particular instr�nce there could be parking in the back of the � n building with removal of some trees� but the trees gave a nice break-off from 57th. i� �' �'ttIDL1,Y APPFALS COP�t�lIS5I0N M�;ETING OF JULY 13, 1976 I ' r � � YAGE 5 5 E Mr. Kemper stated that if the variance was denied and curbing installed on 5ith Place, he didn't think it was the Commission's position to tell them where to park their cars. He stated that was not a concern of theirs, and also the cutting of the trees was somethinr they did not have to get into. He asked if the variance was denied if the Commission should address itself to where they would park their cars. Mr. �3arna replied yes, they had to look at the stated hardship ana look at the �rhole balanced picture. 2�1r. Kemper s�id he understood that, but wondered if the decision was made to deny the request if the,y would have to address that problem. Mrs. Gabel said that tney would have to meet City Code, but the paxking problem was part of the hardship. 2�Sr. Kemper said he dicin't believe it was their position to prescribe to thern how and where to park. bfr. Holden said that each had to be considered as an individual case. rie stated that in this case the hardship was the problem area, and he thought because of the room in the rear and the length of the lot, there would be room to install parking. He added that possibly a couple of trees would be lost, but not all of them, by a matter of design of the parking facility. He said that the neighbor next door had fewer problems �ritn cars, but had a garage and also room to park in front of the garage stalls. He said in that case there would still be the hardship of jocl�iing the cars around. Mr. Barna asked i��ow many cars there were, and hSrs. Johnson said there were ' .usually seven, but right now there were eight. Mr. Kemper said tnere was nothi.ng they.. could do to accommodate that many cars anytaay. Mr. Larna showed how they could�provide three more parking stalls and keep the four they already nad. He I told r1rs. Johnson they couldn't tell the owners what to do, but they could say there were alternatives to parking in the front.- � Mr. Holden made a sketch of another parking alternative, and Mr. Kemper said . if that were done it would be appropriate to insist that some sort of curbin� be installed. Mr. Holden stated that would definitely be appropriate, and any- thing that would be approved by the City Planning Depaxtment would be satisfactory. � Mr. Kemper asked�how many cars could park in that suggested axea, and Mr. Holden answered ten cars. � Chairperson Gabel said it should be taken into consideratior. that the code requires eacn building to have 7.5 parking stalls, and neither building meets that.. i•ir. Kemper stated that the code was generated after the buildings s�=ere ■ built. � � rir. Kemper :>'.�etched a proposed la,yout of a parking area in the back of the buildings, and said this would necessitate a parlcing agreement ��ith both owners. r4rs. Johnson stated there �*ould be a problem as tenants from the other building would park in stalls meant for use b,y her tenants. Mr. Holden suggested putting an apartment number on the curbing for each stall. Mrs. Johnson stated that suggestion would wipe out everything in the back yard, tahere there was grass and a�arden, and they would also have to move a shed. Mr. Barna explained they were just s�ying that there was an alternative to parking in the front. Chairperson Gabel asked what the legal ram�fications taould be of �rantin�; one and not the other, and stated that she felt the two situations iaere reallv different. Mr. Holden said that Staff had discussed these variances with the City Attorne,y, but mostly just the business of violations of the code and not alternative decisions.� rlrs. (�abel asked if this taas just noticed because of the fact that the street wor'k was done, and rlr. �iolden said that was correct. Mrs. �abel said the records showed that the previous owner had been fined, and I'' FRIDLrY AP:' ;ALS COi•:R•1T�SIOP1 ME�7'ING OF JULY 13� ].y76 ��U�. 6 5 F �1 there nad been complaints of trash in the yarci and cars without license plates. - . t:r. : older. n�ted that the bui.ldin�;� had been improved �reatly since the change ' r of ownership. � 'ri0T10:+ by 3arna, sec�nded by Kemper� to close the public hearing. Upon a voice � vote� a11 �oting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ;:r. B?rna said that having looked at +he alterna.tives and th� propert,y as it stan�'.s no:•�, and since the,y were specifically discussing at tnis time 3a0 �?th � Place, he :•r�uld be in favor of allot•�in� o�f-street parking in the boulevard i.n t�ie f.ont -rith requirements as set forth in the letter from Mr. Colbert. rlr. Kemper asked what his feelings were on 390, and Mr. �3arna replied tha� at 390 r they nad i:e garage in the back and cars could be in the garage and in bac'.r of the garage, and that would satisiy the requirements. He explained that would be ten stalls (five in the garage and five outside)� and there should be no , reason for tenants to park in front. He added that at 3�0 he coul.d see a hardship and e1_pen�As involved in providing additional stalls in the back. t�ir. Kemper said he didn't like eating up the Vrhole back yard at 380 with asphalt ' as the green area was more aesthetically pleasing and nice for the kids to play. Mrs. Gabel said she agreed with 2�'ir. Kemper and would like to see the back yard and tne trees not chopped down. She added that as long as they would improve � the front to make it more aesthetically pleasing than it is now, she could live • with an encroachment in the front yard. She said she felt there were defi.nite hardships at 38� �hat did not exist next door. rP�ir. Kemper said that if this was put in the form of a motion and was approved, it appeared that they tiaould be permitting the depressed curbing to stay in front of 3�� and not in front oi 390. He stated that in Tom Colbert's letter he indicated. � it would cost approximately $1,U00 to put the normal curb back up, and asked Mr. Fiolden how much it would cos� to put it back just i.n ir�ont of 390. 2ir. Holden answered it would cost about $300 �to $ltCO� and said that move might be a bit ` questionacle. Chair�erson Gabel said she could see that happening, but stiil thought they had � to look aL this as two individual iteMS as they were ti�ro different situations. She stated that one had a garage wi-ch five parkin� stalls inside and five out with little or no need to park in front. She said that one of the tenants had 1 told her tnere was very l.ittle, if any, parking in front,. and there was a maximum of only .Your cars at the building now. She stated the situation was dit'f'erent at 380. 2�r. Holden said to grant an encroachment and off-street parking variance for 3�0, and tear up the curbing and replace it at 390 would be inconsistent. , Mr. Kemper asked Mrs. Johnson if they were permitted a variance to continue the off-street parking in front, if it would be their intention to delineate that � parking area with some sort of curbing. Pirs. Johnson replied yes, they could do that. Mr. Kemper stated he was sure it would be one of the conditions ii' the request were granted that �,he parking area be covered with a hard surface and � the eorder defined. Mr. 4iolden asked hlrs. Johnson if she realized cars would be getting closer to the front of the building, and she replied she did. Mr. Kemper stated that considering all practical use ,� agree with allowing the variance at 380 and not 3y�• it stiould be an all or nothing deal, but it seemed to II , oi' city's funds, he couldn�t Mrs. Gabel said she agreed be a paradox. She stated , r'1tIDLI�:Y APi'EA� C01�'?�iI� ;ION r?EE'1'Ii�G Or JULY 13, 19�16 PAu�: 7 5 � '� ' she wished tne other Petitioner was present. Mr. Hol.den said he hadn't heard f'rom the other owners, but at the last meeting they said they might be on vaca- tion for six weeks and may not be able 'to attend. Mr. Barna stated that the city looked at this �s one problem, and Mr. Kemper said he agreed. NIr. Kemper added tnat if they had to make a decision� he would be in favor oi' it. MOTIOPI by Kemper, seconded by tsarna, to recommend to Cour.cil approval oi' the ' requests for variances to a11ow ofi'-street parking in i'ront of tr�e e�xistin� !t-Plexes at both 380 and 390 5?th Plac� N.E., F'ridley, with the following provisions: . 1. That the stipulations contained in Mr. Colbert's memo of July 9, 1976� be incorporated. 2. That the parking area tnat would be permitted under this variance be defined by permanent curbing acceptable to tne Staff. 3. The surface of this area be paved with covering acceptable to Staff (ha"rd surface). , !t. The owners both continue to make arrangements fcr private snow plowing services. 5. Council is reminded that this variance does incur an encroachment of 10.5 feet of city property. Mr. Kemper stated that he felt the only alternative to this would be distasteful construction with a lot of black top in back of this building, and that would be the worst► of two evils. UPON A VOICE VOTE, Kemper and �3arna vot�ng aye, Gabel voting nay, the motion carried 2 - 1. Chairperson Gabel said that while it 1Sri�t practical to do so, she saw tnese .as two individual items. She stated she approved granting the variance for 380, but not 390. She explained to Mrs. Johnson that this would go before the City Council on July 26th. 3. RE�UEST FOR A VARIA1vCE OF SECTION 205.075� 1, (E,l) r'RIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALIAW TENANT AND GUEST OFF-STREET °11HKINU IN TH� r'RUNT YARD OF AN EXISTINI� Lt-PLEX� ZUIVID R-3 (GENEHAL 1�IULTIPLE FAI�IILY DWELLINGS), LOCATED ON LOT l, 13IACK 1, AUS ADDITION, THE SAr�E BEIN� 106 - 77TH [,1AY N.E., F'RIDLEY, MINNES- OTA. (Request by Paul Burkholder, 78b0 Alden Wa,y N.E., Fridley� Minnesota 55432). Mr. Holden stated that Mr. Burkholder had called and asked that this item be postponed until the next meeting of the Appeais Commission. '� 2�. REC�UEST FUx A VAHIANCE OF SECT10iv 211t.053, 2, FRIDLEY C1TY CODE� TU KAISE THE 100 SQUAi�E N'EET MAXTMUM STZE 0�' A FREE STANllING SIGN IN C-2S 7ANING I (GENEHAL SHOPPING AREAS), TO 108 S(�UAHE r'E'r',T, TO ALLOtd A 12 SQUAN.E F'OOT '�' FEtIUL�:Y APF'LAL:> CGN�PIT��IO.J I•lEET1PJG OF JULY 13, 1976 I , PAG� � S H INr'0ltA1ATI0N SIUN TO BE ADTIEA TO A1v EXISTINU 96 S�UAktE �'OOT S17.E, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH 20l� F�:F.T OF THE EASTERLY 200 �'EET 0�' LOT 3, BLOCK 2, EAST RANCH ESTATES SECOPID ADDITlON, 'PHE S�1k. BEING 7730 UNIV�it51TY AU�I�U� I1.E., FttIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (Request by the Town Crier Pancake House, 7730 University Avenue N.�;., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432)• Chairperson Gabel stated that since the getitioner was not present, they could not act on this request. , MOTION by Kemper� seconded by Barna, to meeting of the Appeais Commission. Upon motiori carried unanimously. � i ' ' � , � ' ' table this item until the next scheduled a voica vote, all voting aye, the 5. A REQUEST FOx A VARIANCE Or� SECTIOC� 205.�53, 1�, A, FRIDLE'� CITY CUDE, TO � REDUCE THE RECJ.uIxED r�xUNl� YA�tD SETBACK FRuM 35 FEET TO 24.6 FEET, TO ALIAW THE COTuSTRUCI'ION OF AN 18 FT. BY ?_Lt �'T. ATTACHED txAHAGE TO Ai� EX15TIfd(.i NON-CUNr'OtirlIitiG STRUCI'URE, LOUATED GN LOT 9, �3LOCK l, CARLSON' S. SL'i•Il'�IIT iiAtuOR SUUTH ADDITIOY� THE SAri1E �ElN(i 100 PILOT AVENUE N.E., Ftt1D1�'r�Y� hiINNr,SOTA. (Request by Robert C� Struif, 100 Pilot Avenue N.E., �'ridley, Aiinnesota� 55l�21) : . MOTION by Kemper, seconded by Barna, to open the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried_ uxianimously. ADriINISTRATIVr, ST^iF REPORT A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SER.VE� BY RE�UIRr°�IENT: Section 205.�53s �tA, front yard setback of 35 feet. Public purpose served by the section of the Code is to allow for off- street parking taithout encroaching on the public right of c•ray. Also the aesthetic consideration of the�neignborhood to reduce the "building lin� of sig�t" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. B. STATED HA1�.DSHTP: A six foot drop construction of a detached garage. to cons�;ruct an 18� X 24' attached into the back yard would prohibit H,eq_uest variance to front yard setback garage. ' C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFl�' HEPORT: This house was built as part of a"staggered setback" arrangement around 1955� before any ordinances were in effect. The requested garage addition would be approximately 5 feet from the adjacent , property line. Considering the severity of grade change on this lot and , the staggered setbacks of houses in this area, Staff feels that this is a valid request. I i Mr. Robert Struif was at the meeting to present his request. He stated that he wanted to put a garage up, and due to the extreme drop-aff ��here the house was built it would be almost impossible to put in a detached �arage in back. ' He said� however, that his nei�hbor had just done that, and even though his drop wasn't as steep as rir. Struif's, they had gotten stuck there once already. , Mr. Kemper asked if he was now parking beside the house in the area he was proposing for a garage, and rir. Struif replied he was. Mr. Kemper asked if he was planning on building an 18' addition on the side of his house, and Mr. � Struif answered that was correct. , � r':tIDL':.' AT'PI�.4L.� CO��"4T"�ZOra ?4:?rTT,':G OI�' Ji)LY 1�, 1i7� PAG;: � 5 I ' ' �� , � Mr. Struif said that his neiPhbor was a bit concerned about what he was �;oing to do with the snow, but said that in the past it hadn�t been a big problem. ChairF�er::on Uabe7. stated that the Appeals Cornmission could make final approval on this item if there were no ob,jections from neir�hbors, and asked '.'4r. Holden . . . if r1r. ;t,:'Ulf'',� nez�*hhor hr.t�? h��:en n� .i.fied. Mr. Holden replied he had. Chairper^on Gabel �aid it shou7d be noted on tne record that �here are four house: on P�r. Struif's block that met the code, and four houses that were not set all the ��ay bryck. She noted that the neig�bor next i;o him had a?_9.7' setback. rlrs. Gabel commented that a six foot drop would require a lot of fill. t��r. Struif stated he had four contractors look at i.t, and one said there was no prablem at all, but he felt he was saying that just to get a job. He s2id another contractor said he wouldn't build it out in back, and two said they ��rould. rlrs. Uabel asked if they would lose botn zaindows on the side of their house, and Tir. Struif said they :,�ould lose the living room �rindow and the attic taindo�r would be made smaller. He added that the attached garage could be set back to save the windoirs� bu� i.t taould cost an additional �800. I•Ir. Kemper wondered if it was wise not to spend the $800 as he felt they would be losing something by not setting it back. Mr. Barna asked if they had gotten a cost estimate on ' and Mr. Struif replied they hadn't as he heard there •removal and his wife didn't like the looks oi it. ,. �_1 � , a flat roof on the gaxage� was a problem with snow Mr. Ker►per made a sketch of the original plan the Struifs wanted to follow (having the garage set back) and the one they z4ere planning now (even witn the house), and asked if that was really what the,y wanted to do. N�r. Struif replied that the cost was starting to rise, and that was a major consideration. Mr. Holden commented that the drop off from the back of the house to the back lot li.ne was about 10'� and NIr. Barna said that there was no t•ray he could put a garage in the back and get out in the winter time. Mrs. Struif commented that they also didn't want that long driveway to shovel. , Mr. Kemper stated that with an attached garage, he believed the hardship i.n this case iaas the $800. Mr. Holden said if it was built �•rith the setback a variance wouldn't be needed. Mr. Kemper said his only concern was that h;r. Struif might be a little short-sighted on resale value of the home as he would � be creating a longer box. rSrs. Gabel said th� variance could be granted as it is, and Mr. Struif could go less, but not more. � ' Mr. Kemper told hlr. Struif that if this was granted, he would hope Mr. Struif would talk to enough contrac�Lors and convince himself he would really be saving the amount of money he thought he was going to save by going this way. He said the only difference would be the amount of blocks that wou].d be stacked up. MO'P10N b,y Barna, seconded by Kemper, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye� the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Barna, seconded by Kemper, to grant the request for variance. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. r _ ____ . , � r'iiIBLLY Ai PI:IIL,� COta�tI �SIOi� P•1%;ETIi�G OF JULY 13� 1�76 I , rt�c�c l0 5 J RDJOURN?TENT : MOTION by tiarna, seconded by Kemper, to adjourn 'the Appeals Commission meeting of 3uly 13, 1976 at 9:16 P.M. Upon a voice vote, a.11 voting a,ye, the motion carried. ;�Ir. Barna broughi the Commission up to date on the progress of the Youth Center, and offered his assistance and suppo.rt. Chazrperson Gabel said it should be noted that Mr. Barna has offered his expertise and assistance in helping the Touth Center, and suggested he talk with r1r. Storla and some of the City Council people. She asked where the Center would be located, and Mr. Barna told her it would be in tne pump house by the ice arena. He stated that while it was not a large area, it was immediately available space and would not cause any conf'licts with the existing uses of the Cit,y iiall. t•:r. Kemper stated that there was one item he t�rould like to hring up, and asked what sort of follow-up system the city had to make sure stipulations on variances were adhered to. He stated that the Appeals Commission routinely approves requests for variances w-ith stipulations attached to tnem, and never heazs of them again unless an effort is specifical�y made to find out how a particular project went and if it canformed to stipulations. Mr. Holden stated that they were handled routinely through the normal enforcement � of the codes. Mr. Kemper said the reason rie asked was because of the greenhouse, which turned out to be a eor,!,iercial venture, and ;�as wondering if there were � adequate safeguards to ensure the stipulations were adhered to. � �I 2•Sr. Holden said that he felt there were adequate safeguards, but he understood r1r. Kemper's feeling that something might be overlookeci. He stated that routinely, as with the variance that was approved at this meeting, the stipulations would be part of the provisions on the building permit. Chairperson Gabel asked if there was some way the members ot' the Appeals , Commission could routinely get a memo as to what the Council does on tne things that tnis Commission sends to them. i�.r. riolden said they :,ould ask for a summary of' the discussions tnat apply to the t3oard of Appeals along taith the ,� Council's decisions. Mrs. t�abel asked if he could see that was done� and �Ir. Holden replied he woula. She suggested that ttiis be put in the form of' a motion, but added that the meeti.ng would have to be reopened again. MOTIDtv by Barna, seconded by Kemper, ta reopen the Appeals Commission meeting of Ju�y 13, 1Slb�at 9:30 P.I�i. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MO'1'lON by Kemper, seconded by tiarna, that Staff be directed to provide copies of those portions of the City Council meeting minutes that apply to the �ioard of Appeals! decisions. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. �� Tir. Kemper asked if all the material the members of the Appeals Commission received, including agendas, staff reports, Council meetin� minutes� etc., could , be put into one large mailing once every two weeks. rir. Barna said he agreed� ' � , � �J � � , � � � � � � ' � II ' r"rtlliL�i A"rri:AL`; Ci1t•li�iI:;;;IOt� ti;:i:i i,tii, CF JULY 13� 197b PAGr 11 5 K anci said it tirould be adequate to receive them the weekend before each meeting. Mr. Nolden said the,y could tr,y tha.t. 1•SOTION b,y �arna� seconded by Kemper, to adjourn tYze Appeals Commission meeting of Jul;� 13, 1976 at 9;3� P.M. Upon a voice vote, all v�i;ing aye� the motion carried unanimously. � Respectfully submitted, '�"" !% l ,/Vfi� C,/� Snerri 0'Donnell Recording Secretary 0 � �J 5L �N� , � �� = � _ • ^^ MAIN ST. M.E. – w�• , { t �. �,.. .. � . . • . �.. � 4 � �'�1 �. .wI' I.4 ' � t ft � i • ' • • . • �' _y • � \�� 1 . , i:;.;�y.z�,u:�� ..�. :� , .�.. ; .::, ,- � -'-�" 2ND ST. N.E. ` y �A . .� I . . � • I 1. R, ! 1 ^ , � ' � r.: a, ,. � . °' � , \. ♦ ~ ' ' 'w. . .c`. r� S � 2 . � � 4 , •rv `� e, - �i e � ' a � � �.. m � . �l � . . . . • . � � ♦ . . C: y i .. ,. � { '• ; � _ 21/2 ST. N.E. ..; •� w < � ! • � � � � . �. ! < . '. . ' t� R_ �°'.�'. ^ Z`I �.i q�- I� ,�.. ��'i v Z � y. o��, .. a w i � i . - •e— �„ cv — — C C �. .. _. -�S— �i `r , ,� m li;�" ., �'� � �, a a s� m , i �4�h � . `o `. .�* .. e .. . � �, i•�a s''\ ',`- *--- �•.I i 3 R0 � S7. N.E --- � ` r' jU, , . ? u � �. N, � �, � � � 2 � � \ • � . �� ,., Y �, � - � i: m 'i�� v: ,� ,�. t , v �a m .' • v, �C �t . . . s ` i � `„' � ` �V _...� .�� . A -� . -- -a..1__� ; � �n, i`_-`..'�. _j;.',_v'_.+__ `.�c.-�....:-C-:--r?--T--'--�-�'_.,.�a.�_'. . s � ,� . � c,.`"�e .r t : - . -STATE; HIGHWAY �NO- 4� � . � e'''S:RS• __�____� — : ...� .?�...' S _ _i�14__. . . , �. � :':`:: UNiVERSITY � --w zw � ym' a� � x . , t':t�j ��I i;Q , � �€- =� i . �' � . � � � . �o ��' �. - t �, -� D - -- .0 2�,�- - `"�'.' "'..: °c ; ° � ., ;— -- - n — a -G��' °�. - - . +. � . j ` t�`;� �i .►�: � _ �� - , _ . . . . � . _--� . _ �. � . .. ,4.TH I�. ... S7. ,, p N. E.,, .. I �m •- - � , � ;a' �i'��`1 ''',(� � T' r Ca i t\ .'v i? �i' �ri\ J . . . . z 1' : . ��`')C � . . . . ..- -- i�c'� r ..�. _n__ � a.. .._ . .�-�-r�i-'�t��4•�- :. 7�} f�i . _ vl ,. —I Y � :; o - �, z � r, � : _ �, +. � .�� . �. ��`_JZ \: , . . . . ..� . . . _ _ R' 57H ST. N.E. � . . . J�--_�� f--_� �C`�r n '\2, �,`• ,•.�•,�i� V``, sw.?,T,;` :-'� -1� . .� a c • �� ; � ' e L � 2 ' : � l c � __ .l-_1'__.._ r�� V . 1_. '� -�'t .�et_�.1�' � -.'L_�.tr_ _•. �t. ._L+ _ 4� t_ � � � _- _ _ _ _ Z ` v � T v i p ^ ,� 1_,� -- m �, a r. -_ : Q. i � i � 8 •_, � ? • ,f a� `� , �,� . . , 6TH 4 .� ST. e `N,E�` _ • ' .._ J -- ` " '' •' • �'r ,,.. : o �. ., y._ „ � � ,. _ \.. \ ,* , �•.�° � � � h� �c F � : � .�. 's T v � , � ': i ' - < . . o y a , o-z ' y as. �• - m ti - � � � • v � . _ ..- _._�-'�-'�_L_._.__- f+t ^ _-.. . o , r '�_ .ac'-.�--.r.yr_..�..__ C . i � y, iw �\ : � �^ r� �- m % �� y � ' _. � I Y ,�N ' , � � . � .a � � ' � . ' ' • \ � _ _ ' • N _ ._ � � /, '� T ' _ ' . �. -::.., 7TH • wST."'°°"N.ET_. . ' _ .l 4a 'z � z .n. � ., �� p � � t� } ��j' }` :,i �N w .�y.� i ti � . i � : : i ,i Z� . o o _ n ` `� � _ . " Ze" , . ;N . . m \ �, m• 5 ° � y " �° i�:° � 'z s4-.0 :o., .. ..... `c yc�.��.1•qiA ..�'; = e . . s ' -+�in�'... � 'K" "' �•' ` • WASHINGTON ' ST. • N. E. 7 ., � �� _ :;�... .. ,. .. .. . , � _ � � �' � � . � C�< ., �i ,�l -`�`'�\ i m �,`- �� i� �, �.�Gw; . e1 Z v 4,�• n� 1• . w � s� i . � � � +, � � O.. _ �y• �rj .. . `n _ �� _ � 1;J�:Q'} :�?a-rnjp'i-',z�`.:..,�.'a+�•e.�♦�- Z •N m � . .. .. . .. �� . ., . , , . r~v.'�-'t�EffERSON ~ST. N.E. . � . , , . i � � i .. � , ' n . i1., � a . ' � � •� , , ; . , c { . a . i . . ~ : �� _��_ r 4 J. _ .. � .. .. • MaoisoN sr. N.E. : ^ , , , ,' • '� ,`� .; . : � , , , � � ' �. . ,c� �1 � • . � _ ,.: ....' , . , _. .,. 'Qi .� .,. � m � , .M � '� j .. . .. , . lSf4i11SON $T r ' m • > i ' �. ; ^� i - ' ' r . � , . j� ' '. ,. � a. :.. �, ,� ' . , • . , . .s� �. � , ., V °� , MONROE •ST. N.E. �\ • '— (" • ' . D , —. �r �� , t . w . . � . +. . . ♦ G�,: .. � � PLANhIPIG CC��SISSTON 1� : ING CITY OF FRIDLEY JULY 28, 1976 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDr.^R• Chairperson Harris called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ' ROLL CtiLL: � ' Members Present: Harris, Bergman, Bruce Peterson (attending for Langenfeld), Schnabel, Lambert (attending for Shea) MeMbers Absent: Ot:�ers Present: Robert Peterson Jerrold Boardman, City Planner � APPROVF °LA'�VING COi�•`ISSIO:v' AIINUTES: JULY 111� 1976 , MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Lambert, that the Planning Commission minutes � of Jul�- 11t, 19;6 be approved �: written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried una.nimously. ' RECEIVE SPFCIAL ?AP�S & RECREATION *1IIv'UTES: ��ULY 6 1976 5 r� � Mrs. Schnabel said she wasn't able to find the total dollar amount in the minutes, and asked if tha;. �:as because they were tentative figu��es or if it was omitted. Shs stated s`:e �as just curious as to what dollar amoun t they were ta2king abou� ' for the total budoet. 2•:r. Boardman stated that.this was the total capital outlay budget, so if all the items were added together it would be the total of capital outlay. , , ' ' ' Chairperson Harris directed Mr. Boardman to look on page 29 under Administration and General Use (Fro�;ram 237), and asked �ahy there were so many zeros in that colwnn. Iie wondered wa,y those particular items were listed_if there was no budget for them. r;r. �oardman suggested that perha�s they were listed inii;ially and have been de?eted. Nxs. Schnabel said it appeared that items 11 �;hrougli 15 in that same coltli,.n took care of some of the items starting from 5 on. N�r. Boarciman said in o�her i,rords, they were asking originally for a tractor with a rotar3� mower, but inste�d dropped that r-equest and wen{: with three hand mowers. Mr. Harris asked khat type of hand fertilizer spreader cost $150, and rSr. Boardman said it mi�ht be a large one, but he didn't know. He added that if Mr. Peterson or Mr. Dave Harris had been at this meeting, they could have gotten some answers. MOTIOPI by Rergman, seconded by Schnabel, that the Planning Commission receive the minui.es o� th� Special Pleeting of the Parks and Recreation Corr�niission meeting of July 6, 1976, and rold them for quest.ions until the next repulai• meetin�; of the Pl�nnin� Comriission to �et inter�retations on some of the items. Upon a voice vote� all �oting aye� the mot�on carried unan�.mously. Plannin� Commission Meeting - July 28� 197G Page 2 RECEIVE SPECIAL PARKS & RECREATION MINUT�:S: JULY 1�, 1976 5N MOTION by Ber�man, seconded by Lambert, that the Planning Commission receive �the minutes of the Special Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of July 1�, 1976, and hold them for questions until the next regular meeting of the Planning Cammission to �et interpretations. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairperson Harris called the Commission's attention to page 38 and the list of project committee members that were present at the special Parks and Recreation meeting. P�Sr. Boardman explained that the meeting was just for the chairpersons, and all or the neighborhoods er.cept one were represented at that meeting. He stated the chairperson for neighborhood 10 wasn't in attendance because she was sick. � Mrs. Schnabel asked if she could receive a map of the various districts, and Mr. Boardman passed out maps to both rirs. Schnabel and Mrs. Lambert. Mr. Boardman said he wanted to add that last r�onday night there was a meeting of Parks and Recreation and the organization for the overall Recreation Corunittee was set up. . , RECEIVE APPEALS CO:�T4ISSION r1INUTES: JULY 13, 1976 MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission receive , the minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of July 13� 1976. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1 Chairperson Harris said that it again appeared that the t�ppeals Commission had been working very diligently and hard, and they were to be commended for their good work. , l , , � ' RECFIVE CONI�IUNITY DEVELOP.•iENT i�1INUTE5: JULY 13, 1976 MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Schnabel, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Corununity Development meeting of July 13, 1976. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion caxried unanimously. NIr. Bergman said that regarding the Sign Ordinance Corvnittee, there have been two meetings of the project committee. He stated the second meeting was held July 26th, and he was not in attendance. He said he did attend the first meeting and reported on that one previously. Air. Bergman explained the subcommittee met on the fourth rlonday of each month, and he thou�ht it got fairly well organ- ized at the first mee�in�. He comsnented that he thought the committee members would find it was a much more complicated and diverse challenge than it appeared on the surface. Mr. Ber�man said that three representatives from sign Qampanies were invited to the second meeting, and added that Dennis Schneider was spending quite a bit of his personal time. 1ie stated that it would take awhile to wade through a lot of detail and arrive at some breakdown nnd enumeration of what kinds of things they were real.ly* concerned about. }ie said that there was not yet a completion c�ate, but they were movin� forward. � Planning Commission Meeting - July 2t3, 1976 Page 3 ' Mr. Bergman continued that they had a second project commiti:ec--the Bikeway/ Walkway Yroject Co;rJnittee, whi.ch was a continuatin� pr�ject corrrmii;tee. He stated that at their last meetin� Mr.. Vern Moen, the on-going chairperson of ,, BiYeway/`�Jalkway� was in attendance.� Mr. Bergman said they discussed the status t�nd expect;ations of the committee �riih hi.m, and approved a proposed project corunittee delineation scopF: with current view. He stated that the project co:rmittee had been dormant for some time, but Mr. Moen was planning to call a � meeting sometime within the r,ext month to month and a half to review where things are and identiiy things that ought to be attEnded to or further reviewed. Mr. �ergman said that at this point he would like to raise a problem they were havin� in the Sign Committee getting minutes recorded, typed and distributed. He said that as an example of that, he had reqLested at the last Comriunity Development meeting that minutesd�carriedlforthmastpartbofathoseeminutes� but Comrminity Development minutes an tha� hadn�t been done. He said they also have the iyped project com.•ni.ttee description for Bike�aay/`In'alkway. 1��r. Bergman said he t•:ould like to ask what was normally done with regard to 1) Ho?a do other projects solve the secretarial problem taithout Staff assistance, and 2) How do those minutes get carried forth, or don't they? He further stated that at the last CDC rneeting they were handed roughly-typed copy of the Sign Comriittee meeting minu�es, and did receive them at Community Development level. He said•that unless something else hUppened, that was the end of the travel of those minutes. Chairperson Harri.s said he thought that was probaoly all that �:as necessary f.or those minutes unt�l Communitv Development, took some type of acticn or made a recommendation. r1r. Harris iold Dir. Bergman that if he wished to include those minutes �•rith the . recorL-nendation or action from that cor�mittee to the Planning Com-nission� i.t could be done tnat t�ray. He tnen zsked rlr�. La*nbert how it h*as ha.ndled in Hurlan Relations. rss. La,mbert replied that as far as she Trnew, the Fine Arts Committee was the only active subco�runittee in Huma.n Relations at this time� and she happened to be the secretary of that. Chairperson Haxris said there was Bergman stated they were �orking they w�uld be. 50 a problem taith that in the ordinance. Mr. on the problem, but he didn't kno'w how sucessful 'Mr. Bergman said that as input from the BiYeway/Wal}.��raY t�s'oject Commit.t°e and from administration, they received and approved a project committee description for the Bikeway/�.TallR�:ay Subcommittee. He said.that this should be then processed in the minutes of the Planning Commission as Community Development had taken action on this. rlr. Harris said that should then appe�r in the minutes from Community Development. � 1. TABLFD: PUI3LIC H��ARIhG: COi�SIDERATION OF A PRELIi��INAItl' PLAT P.S. �76-0� 5t� L, '� ct :�i:,:' �T l;. :i DilI`T 0;, e IJ� 1)a:ili}�L A. 'r':i:i�Z DFUL:LCF?`,F;NT ��;,,� ;, • nein„ a rep a oi l:ot� 1 o incl.u.sive, :.i ocka 21 through �iT�a .so part oi' Lot. l, Block 28, Innsbruck I�orth Tow�nhouses Third Addition, to allow changes in the size of �ara;�es, �enerally located on the West side of East Bavarian Pass and Sout,h�of rleister Road N.E. Public hearing open. ' � �'l�nnin� Cammis�ion Meeting July 2tl� 1976 P��;c 4 � '�5 P , ' Mr. }3oardman explained to the Commission that he had talked rrith Jim London, and Mr. London a:,ked again that this remain tabled because Darrel Farr has been gone and they haven't been able to sit dorm with the Tormhouse Association yet. Mr. Boardrnan brou�ht to the Commission's attention a letter to the Chairman of the Planning Commission from 1°ir. Jerry W. 1lnderson, Chairman o£ the Architectural Control Committee, dated Jul_y 20, 1976 which said that in lieu of a request for withdrawal they would like this letter part of the record of the Planning Commission. MOTIOIv' by Ber�man, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning ComJnission recei.ve the communication from 1-ir. Anderscn to the Chairman of the Planning Commission dated July 20, 1976. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. , MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Lambert, that the i?lanning Corzmi.ssion table the Public Hearing on consideration of a preliminaxy plat, P.S. ��76-05, � Innsbruck Plorth Replat Third Addition, by Darrel A. Farr Development Corpora- ' tion� with the Public 3ieara.ng open, until the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried una.nimously. 2. PUBLIC HEAPIr�G: COPdSIDERliTIO?1 OF A i'R��.,'LIf•IIPIA.RY PLAT, P.S. #75-06, RE_�I, ESTATE 1.0 S�'CCi;D r,DDITiC.: �i' �R.ii�-PAL:�.I 3LIi.J;:� Being a replat of Lot , Auditor's Subdivision Ido. 2, to clarify the le�al description of:a building site generally located at 91�1 Hillwind Road N.E. 2•SOTIQN by Bergman, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing on consideration of a preliriinary plat, P.S. #�76-06, Rea1 Estate 10 Second Addition� by Bratt-Pa1en �uilders. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye, Chairperson Harris declared the �'ublic Heaxing open at 3:05 P.i•i. Mr. Francis Girdler, representing Real Estate 10, and Messrs Don Bratt and Elmer Palen, Builders, z��ere present. Mr. Boardman said that first of all, he wanted to correct the map on page 65, and explained the dash line should be moved to the property to the South of that (parcel 1130). He stated that this was a petition by the owner of the prop�rty to approve a prelinLinary plat on the property. He explained the reason for the preliminary plat zaas because the legal description on the property as is t•ras very� very lengthy and the owner would like it simplified. 2�Sr. Boardman said the property to the South of this had been platted in a similar situation to tris, the property to the East was platted in an apartment ownership, and the property to the North does have an existing building on it. Chairperson Harris asked if they were planning on building a f�ture building on this, and t�u. Bratt replied they had to get an easier legal description because they i•rere bui.lding a home there. He explained it was presently an empty lot. He added that Real Estate 10, Second Addition, �ti�as not the correct name� and asked that it be changed to Lot 1� Hillwind Addition. � ' �� Plunning Meetin� - July 2�� ly7 1 � Y��e 5 Chnirperson Harris asked if that was the proposed �tructure pictured on page ' 61�� rind Mr. F3ratL replied it was. tie said it was t�asicaily a L-shaped split- enl,ry. _ , Chairperson Harris asked if the lot met all of the zoning requirements, and Mr. Boardman replied they would have to picic up some easements on the property to the East of this in order to allow for sewer easement on this road. Mr. � Bratt explained that the ot•m er of the apartments there owned that land, and they had arran�ed with him for that easement. ; Mr. Girdler stated that he o�,�ned the property to the South (1300) and had the st�me no-se�•rer situation. He agreed with t�;r: Bratt that they should get together and pay £or it. � � �� , ' 5� Mr. Bratt stai;ed that if this Commission recommended to Council approval of i;his� they would also like to have them recommend that a building permit be issued upon approval of the prelininary plat, �rith the idea that they wouldn't be able to move in until afr_er final plat approvalT:r. Bratt said he understood this had been done before �c�ui.te a few �imes. He �xplained the reason this request was made was because the cost of the proposed house would go up approximately $1,000 by the middle_of August, $�d their mortgage commitlaent was about to run out. Mr. Boardman asked if all code requirements would be met, and Tir. Bratt replied they �*ould. He said they even had a building permit subject to t:�ese thir.bs. Chairperson Harris asked if there were any other drainage requirements� and Air. Boardman replied nothing else was necessary. • ' Mr. Berg:�an stated that this particular lot was zoned R-3, and he belie�red some additio:�a1 property in that area was zoned R-3. He said rlr. Bratt's intenti.on was to make a R-1 use of this parti.cular lot, and asked him if he 1 kne�a if there iaere aazy similar plans for surrounding land. i�r. Brat� replied �that he didn't know. He said tha}.. Rea1 Estate 10 had the property� to tiie South, but beyor.d that point going South he didn't kno:.r :•rhat anybody's plans were. rir. Bergman said that there �aere plans at one time considering a neighborhood ' shopping area. 1�Sr. :�iarr�s said he recalled that, but that would. require re-zoning. � � •M(?�1'ION by Bergman, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Comrtission close tne Public He�? .1.11� on consideration of a�reliminary plat, P.S. ;�76-06, Real Es;;ate 10 Second A.ddition, ny Bratt-Palen Builders. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson F�arris declared t}ie Fublic Hearin� closed at 8:17 P.Pi. MOTIO:� by Bergman, seconded by La.�nbert, that the Planning CorLmission recommend ' to Counci.l approval of a preliminary pla�, P.S. }�76-06, Real Estate 10 Second Addition, by Bratt-Palen Builders; Being a replat of part of Let 1�, Auditor's Subdivisi�n No. 2�, to clarify the legal description of a building site , generally located at 9l�1 Hillwind Road N.E., subject to identificstion of sewer easement from the Easterly direction. ' ,, ' ' C}iairperson Harris asked if rir. Ber�man wished to �lso recomrr,end the issuance of a buildzn�. permit if the preliminar,y plat �aas approved, ai�d Mr. Ber�man said his motion did not include that. He s�aid he felt nothin�; ��ould be served by that recommendation, and preferred to leave it to the City Cotmcil. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all votin�; t�ye, the mot,ion carr�ed unanimously. I � .� �.... �11 � r.�iuinln[; t�vtrttn7.s;i10❑ P'�CCL111[; - JUly Z(S� ].J(b pA�,'C 6 3. CONTINUI?U: HU1�tAt1 DEVI:IpP1-iEIJ7' C,OAIS ATiD OY.JECTIVES Mr. Boardman informed the Commission that he had nothin�; further to discuss on this at this meeting. Mr. Boardman brought to the Cornmission's attention�the Offi_cial Publication Notice of }iearin� by t}ie City ot Spra:ng La�:e Yark. He explair.ed it was a � I� rezonin� request concerning the �enera.l location of CentTal h•renu� P:.E. and _ Osborne Road, and that it would be heard by the Spring La�:e Park �ity Council on Au�ust 2, 1976. , ', MOTIpN b� Schnabel, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Co:nmission recFive the Notice of a Public Hearing on the rezoning request concerning the gene:al � location o�' Cent,ral Avenue N.E. and Osborne Road. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye, th� motion carried unanimously. ' ADJOURI�P�IFNT : ' I•TOT'IO�I by Feterson, seconded by Bergman, that the meeting be adjourned. Upon a voice vot?, all votin� aye, Chairperson Iiarris declared the Planning Conunission rneeting of July 28� 1976 adjourned at 8:.�3 by unanimous vote. Respectfully submitted,_ �' �!/�^ /7%7� ) f / / k %%�! �%([ � i�-f� �/ She�i�i G' Donnell,J Recording Secretary 5R� T*-� -� ` ` , ` � `•.: •� w�; '-:... �,4!, � HILLWIND ADDITION PS 76 5 S � I .,,�, , , P ; ,.;^ � � W!/4 COR,tiER r I j w'.� ;�r -.i %�°^.�.,.,, �, .. ! �; �,� �C� �' � C . �' _ . .. . �. � �'r iu�. . . 7�f5 � a4 � d/ � � 'N � r¢' •1y � � �Ef 2a . . . �Y' _ �f � I—i � �.C.K "A f � t�! ^� , . ,. . ',y. ,;. ': � , ., -- . . „o » j' � � .: 0!� ��. ... � '' �� / / / ',��.�r- •{� . �,J � :�4 .. � f.:'%M �� pt."�'� •:l1 �`�'� .. ...�.s _ �� . I � • � • , � I � ' t �{ „ � � ".».i+ . ti,� ;,'�-t, '� i � � lt l.' �� !� , . � � � � � / . z � : � . ' ._ ti' r'* � nq; e i � ., .. . �(+�'� �� ' � ✓n � • ` n. .Js�. . / " ��,,,�,,, ; • . �..��. v • �_ \i i .., .,�^ � _ \, � � ��.+��r � ^ , ,' � ' . . . i �.�, .+% t Y � ° ,y ' % ' �:: ! •h t � •� .`�i � i.� .I.b'(� , -j � � Y� �+ yr. �.` � �/' ' • � , 1 i � ' %�''� ; . r � 3 ,; �+,�� a hti .,1 ;.v Jr �:. :n ,o � t � (!, (^� � i ' o,v, \, /�� :.:�"�i :;� •• ��a � e � 1 . ,. f . f ,. .. � •� i . (� . 3 � .r�.: c..r . . ...,� ± �F��'•� �„� � _. �`V �;,i �'i' 1,`ti II �\ I/ �,2 ro 9 i : " - .` � 3 Cr) � � � :! � . � ; � a, ; � :,..� ' - i' 1��.-- � ,,;- � � , ,,, . � ,, ', f ' � .c• .:y..- �O.I��{1». �...s..s.•.. . . �' iii� �i�� '� - � 0 ' ., {..iJi11Ef� . i' . ♦ i t � �� G±� � // ,V �p ), ]/ ' �� t -. s5�; � � � �5�4 Y il 5: -; :, a 3 a i! a il � , i 1 9 . � �! � ^ , , . � q„� k LS ,'�' y .�n �" � < � �. � � e�o.fl�.l 1.• .�-.�.q: . � � � I .atf,bVi�:oA�fc � i ; �� .��cllso✓�i•4i��.�iryrarsz`�i�vsz ;st •* • %s `• • , � . �C .4 t GL�_ " k:.� � I . � . / Jl)!.i/ . . �c.�-� � Il�cu s��tsn � � .�YhD� i o co s, sr .r y r, L. . � . .. .��•.i:� � ��. ..r,n ll �s i r; 7__„ ,. j • �r,..y:.al'_ + _ :'`' ' . ., SAlS ' /�ale! ' I I sy �� !i1 ?i75 y�:�I-eN.N � ..E-�7i i . 1 � .: - ' .a ' )i 1S 7f lf (r� .� \f y� . +.�.0�lf IJ/ IIIOS �l /J1' � .7 i � � .,. ' ` ` .! 71 at 4 h � � � � ��,,` � 1 •{� '� � a. r�� .i J:� I : :M ,O � •i r�-.J s`.{' Y � Z 5 � J �: 3 � 1 � � Q' 6 y 7 ~ �' r S�J ?t. � � 3 � 7 t ! ! ' f = ` i �- ., �..,.- ' - � � f - � /!9J OS i . � 'i t\ _ ' ` . � I :s� :K , t )StL J�:i- f� _ . - 7, I ' -s 'S f � _'t . � f . � �. � �� . �i( � � 1 ' S f: J� . , n s , �. . , c ' i __....._. �__�_. . i J� -• � �►- . ., J ✓ : �- , , 3 ��, ..., �;" o � � �:.��:s �;�. . _�..✓o, � � AuD�TaR'S �� i : � � , t ' � !� t � � � � i i _ R---.,a -� � .- — —_ " �- :, 'a- -----T-- ---� -------- — ' � l � � ,>, :i � � � t / � . � � t i/ � � ! T � ' , -. . '. -- - -'— - '-'-...___._ —. l.._...__' _ . ....__ � ,.. F � --- -1 . • � O��i' 4 � -� U.`. � � � � �/770.' ; ~ . / ii i c O, � I `��' =` 1 �„� � � ��za s�,_ i, 1 . �,... -- _ . ... �° ,: _.-- - - =� .:�.� ;�,- `.�_--' r • ':I ; �., `� ` ~� � jO�� -'� t .• ,' � ';' � , � ` �` , .5 .•` ' : � �.r+'' \ / ' �:, . , . ' ..__'-..___-7___ _JEc..i ._. � �. � ... ..... ..... '_""y "�, \ 7-----___" an. �;� 11tS• . � � ' � SU�Dilli�l�4v � , � � � ��, ' ' 6 �; i . , ' ,: 1 (�uoo? ,.• � � E � .� I i � . Q • P.S i1_F�� . �. _ ` � � i ( , , � i ' -.>, i � �;��, `. -----��"-- ----- � -r' -- --�-��--... . .. ---- -. _ .- -----�-- � . 1. '� ,�ii� h: � -` �-- ---------•�-•------ --;\--;'��••••� ('/s•;?' � . � --` � -- -- , .� ,. , , ,. b _rs��.s__._..__ , .. __- -- 0 ` . . � i; ----------"--•-..._-•-'---------•-'-� --"-"--"----• - � . __. � / - � G�`; I� . . _ �� . t:-- -"'--"----' � • OO ` \ � - F.f s-- p � - -- ('- -- --- 5�-- -- -' . . ,. y� � � �. '.; �0. J --' .Aklo v �aaFr. ... � L� ' �' . � """""'. ' "'"' ""' "' � -------------------------------------------- ' ��. � (I3s�y (� , . ;b . � .• I . �i • � ' . '. .. , +. ; � � M19` . c� • . . '�� I !�O ' . .__.._.' ".......__.._ """._....,.. . µ ' � ' """"""' ' '� � " ' ': . " " " • � :r-- - S�-�"-'tr' $j � _ ,� ----------- --__ j . ''•r� ; ` . .JYY.. 1- �y . ' . . . aJ �'\ � •_' ...0��(.Y.w��titr�.' ` .._� _ .. . ?J�a�' � .n i . , ` � ' • - "' �w _ 3'� - - = eCZ4?6s'_.-- � •�� ' _--�_ _ _-V�1-- - . l ��,� .• .. . . �.e w � . _ . . V . ' r' - . . , � ._ �.o. ��s. rr ... \ �• ---' ' - � � r *, . . � � � �� - - .. ; �� ' �n -- __ _ ; 'rn • � .. - hI -- F . . , _ . 1 , � ///�� A� . � , r� • _�;.e .y � � _ . ' N � � � • - �' ^ _ -'-`° � _' ` � 1 , ' � . � 4 . � ' • • . .. „ , ' y,, �• : � . .. . � � ' , ' • - / � /�." �/_ . .. _..�"�' � � _' �� , � I I - •�`v' •�Ii� • J,y . �� . d � ; 5 . .;:�� , .:�;1. , :.•. r � /: �� 1."' Y , .� .��n� j • .• .. it . .a .. . . � PLANNIhG CO*�IISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 4, 1976 Council Action Required: Appeals Commission Meeting of July 27, I976 Paul Burkholder, 106 77th Way NE Town Crier Pancake House, 7730 University Avenue NE Variance Fee Schedule Joseph Siniga;lio; S'' ��76-11, ��715 3rd Street NE 40' Lots o � FftIUL�:Y APPEALS (:OrIMISSION NEETIr�G JiJLY 27, 197b MEP�it�EkS PRE�ENT: V:irginia Scht��bel, Alex �arr�a, Pat Gabe1, i�:ck ��mp�r, Jim Plemel i�IEriBE'i;.� ABSi,IdT : Vone OTHERS PRES:�i�'1': Ron Holden, Building Inspectien Cfficer The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Scn.�abel at 7;30 P.At. APPROVAL 0:' APPF4LS CC:•��ISSIO;v n.INU'^�S: J�i�?E ?_9, 1976 P�lOTlON by $arna, seconded by Plem�l, that the Appeals Commission aaprove t�:e minutes of the June 29, 1976 meetin� as written. Upon a voice vote� all voting ayre, the motion carried una.nimously. APPROV!`T, OF I�PPEALS COI��?�1ISSIOPI PiINUTFS: JULY l�, 1976 Mr. Holden informed the Commission thai the date of July 26th on page ?, �tn paragraph from the bottom, should be cha.nged to .A:u�ust 16tn. MO'iION by Kemper, seconded by Gabel, that the Appeals Com^-,ission a�prove tne minzztes of the July 13, �976 meeiing as t,ritten. Upon a voice vote, a�l voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONTINUF�D: REQUEST FOR A VAHIANCE Or' SECTICN 2�5.07�, 1, (E,1) FRiDLE� CITY CODE, TO ALLO��J TF,NANT AlvD GUF,ST 0��'-STRE�i PARKIivU Ii� TH� 'r'RQ�,fi YA�D OF Aiv EXISTI�'G !t-PLEX, ZUNED R-3 (GENERAL rSULTiPLE Fti:�'ILY D��dELLINGS), LOCATED ON LOT 1, I�LQ�:,K l, AUS ADDITlON, THE Sp.;,E BEI:�G lOb 77T� ;�?aY N.E., FR�DLEY, r1INi�ESOTA. (Request by Paul Burkholaer, 7860 Alden Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55�3�). MOTION by Barna, seconded by Gabel, to open the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATIVE STAr'F R�,PORT A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SEHVED BY REQUIR�:I�IENT: Section 205.075, 1, (E,1} prohibitin� parking in the required front yard. B. STATED HARDSHIP: Petitioner stated that he needed to install 2 to 3 additional parking spaces in front of said !�-Plex to accommodate guest and ter►ant parking since 77th Way has been design�ted a t'no parking anytime" street. This situation has created a problem for the petitioner because guests could previously park at the curb, and n.ow will sometimes be i'orced to park in the � , H'ridl e,y Appea7 s Commi ssi nn M�et.i n�* �f Ju1,y ?7, 19�b P��.� � 6 B � drivewa,y because of the parking ban an 77th 4Jay. The property across the street is heavy commercial (Barry }�lower Company) and to the East of �', � sub,ject propert,y, F3arry i�lo4�er's pa�kin€; lot tor their er�p2oyees. i � C. ADMINISTF�.ATIVE STAFr' REVI�d: Staff inv�stigaiion shows a similar 1�-Plex apartment next door at 7673 East River Road wha.ch rias parking in the front yard 29 feet irom the curb. 106-77th i•iay N.E. is setback approximately 50 feet from tne curb with a 15 f't. boulevard intervenin�. The rear of' this building has 3 parki_n�; st;.�lls, ?�rhich are the oni,y er.i�tin� off-street parl:ing stalls for this huild.in�;. For � double u.nits tne required nu^�ner of off-street parking stalls is 8. ' The "no parking, anytime" signs were posted on (7th ?�Tay during Sentember, 197�, to control. excessive on-street parking by �arry i31oU:er employees in response to a complairit by Donna Anderson of l�?6 77t1i ?��a,y N.E. ' The petitioner is the oVm er of the 1�-Plex at 7673 East River Road, as well as the corner lot situated bett-�een the two ?partment buildings. 'r'his corner lot is not developed, and appears to be ava.ilable i'or tenant parking. Tnis ' may be a viable alternative to this request. Tiie vacant lot t:�ould accorunodate at leas�i a 3-Plex apartment and joint parking arrangements could be made. i ' I ' Staff feels that all viable alternativas to this request should be consid- ered. Mr. Burkholder ap�.roached the Boa.r.d and explained to the Commiss5_oners the photographs and a diagram shoTvririg pres2nt par'r.ing and the proposed parking. He explained that one of his tenants had cornplained to �he Police Department that people from �arry Blower were blocking the drive��ray„ so the "no parkir�g, anytime" signs were posted. H� said that now when guests c�e tnere .��as no room for trier� to park, and said he discovered this af.ter he had received a parking ticket. Mr. Burkholder explained 'ne also oT�nied the empty 1ot on the corner which is zoned for a 7-Uni�, but .he was not doing anytiling rrith it presently. He stated that no�� ne was being faced .,�ith tne problem of people pullin�; onto the grass, and he ��rould 1 ike to put in about a 3�' blacictopped area which �ould still leave about a 20' setback, and there �•rould be p�ent.�,r oz� room fcir people to get out. He shokied on the diagr�n ��rhere the p�rking lot �would go, and explained ne t�ras not �xixious to put in a great big par!:ir.g l�t becausE: blacktop was so expensive. Mr. Barna asked if t?:e depth taotzld be just enough for a parking stall, and Tir. Burkholder said yes, with a 1.ittle bit extra. I�1rs. Gabel asked about parking for thc proposed 7-Unit building, and �Ir. Burkholder sai.d he z�Tould probably have to request anothe, variance at that time as �� w�s not ae=;.rahle to have any mo: e traffic coriing in off of East Riv�r Road. I�1r. Kenp�r asked i.f the only reason for this addition<�l partiing area would be to facil.itate guest parkin�, and P•ir. Burkholder replied it iaould be for tne tenants also, as some of them had two cars. He sxplained he has had this buildin� fc�r about four years, and three or four cars in the back is no p��ob?em, but any more would be a problem. He added that with no parking on eit;ne.^ side of the street it was a difficult situation. ' �'~1c?� , ."i, :.,. �,.�.��.�1r,n "4�'�'f;ln�; �i1' ,?lzl;� ?'j, ��7f.� P?�e 3 6 C � t•Sr. i�erlper ask�d wh;r the street �ras desi�nated no parking an,ytime, and P�1r. Holden explained it c?:�e about as a result of a comnlaint from one of the tenants. ne anned t-,at t:nere �;ere children in tiie apartrnent,:�, and 77 tn �1a,y has t�ecome a shortcut wi t:� �1Pu:^! tr. ffic, so it was also a safet,y �recaution. Mr. I�olden acided Ltiat 3r;r^;; '��lo��:e.r was asked about hi: emplo,yees, and r�e said therc> ti•ras no proble:-. at :il as he had adequate parlcing. Chairperson �c:�nabel asked if ;�frr�� 310-s �:^ r?n �`i; :^our:r a da,y, and i�Ir. Holden ren].ied that he believed ti�ie,y ha_c� �-,�� ...?fts. '•'.r. PI.e~:el. asked if the city cou]d restrict street parkin� to tenen �s r�: ;� uG-sts � anci P:r. I3arna said tr�c�y coul d not. I�:r. Burkhcider stated that was a busy street and he thougnt it was �oing to get a wot �:;usier, ar:� he used it himself as a shortcut. iie said there rea� ly :•:oulci.�'t �r_�� -r.�- pro�le� zs there �tiasn't a blind corner there, but no��r peopJ.e :•rere par�:�ng r��ht ;:p on the grass. � Cnairperson Sc^:nabe? asked if there was a fence that ran across the back of tne lot, �nd ,�ir. Bur:chold.er replied there eras a 6� Cyclone fence that separated t�e p:oper:,ie�. i:.�. 5c:�nabel a.si,ed ?:o�,* many ten�nts in this bui�ding had cars a� t:�_s t�:�e, ?sid I•ir. Bu.rkholder replied there taere f ive cars. I��irs. � Schnaoel asked i�<r. :-iolden if there were any other viable solutions otner th2n the sugges;,ion of pnrhaps going into the empty lot. P-1r. Holden replied there reall�= weren't, as �t taas so ti�ht up against the property lines in either � direction. He said that building another multi-unit apartment complex on the corner co�.:�d all.eviate the p�oblem; but that was in the distant future. r � �x. Burkholder stated that he thought he taould put some hedbes along t::e street if the re�uest ;�Tas zpproved, because he wanted it to be aes�cneticaliy pleasing. He said t�:at he onl•r lived five blocks from there, so he :aas concerned, and addec� he iaoug:r � this ��4s a reasonable request. P•ir. Holden saic that both buildings t�rere setback in such a wa�* that the parking t�ouldn't obstruct any vision in the area. Chairpersen Schnabel said she could see, too, �hat even if P�ir. Burkholder was -'to bui.ld on the empt,y lot, he was goin� to have a si�,rline problem kneping the building bacic far enough so there taouldn't be an�- visual blockage of the intersection. IIr. Burkholder said that eventuall�-, if the building went up, he �J:ould be applying for front nark�ng a�ain. He add�d that he thotight it could look nice. Cnairperson Schnabe_1 asked about a�reen area, and rir. Burltholder replied he would still have a green area as his tenants had children. A1r. Plemel asked if' he just intended to pat in three stalls in front, and rir. Burkholder replied that was his intent;ion. He said that f'rom an aesthetic standpoint, four would look like the whole front yard ZJc'�S a parking lot. Mrs. Schnabel said if he had si.Y stalls and the tenants had i'ive cars, that would leave only one space for guests. rtr. Burkholder said that sometimes they parked next door in the Barry Blower lot. ri0TI0N by 3arna, seconded by Plemel, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ( Cnairperson Schnabel stated that it would appear the problem was the landlocked position of this particular unit and the property it sits on, and the fact that ' the petitioner really has no where else to go to provide parking accommodations for tenants and guests. � i�ridlc:,y �p�ic,ils (:orruni ::�ion I�iect,in�; o£ J�.ily �7� : )7b Pa�c �t Mr. Kem�er commented that it appeared to him there was front-,yard parking all over that area. Mr. Plemel asked if' the parkin�; lot could be limited to a small� an area as possible and tnere be no encroacnrnent on the 15' ooulevard. i�e added that i.f ;�9r. tsurkholder intended to build in a year or two� it crouldn't be f'easible to insi�t on parl:ing in tne empty lot. t�1rs. Gabel �aid �tie agreed, and would also like it limited to three stalls so�there ��asn't blacktop from one end to L'ne oth�r. i4r. I3arna :;aid th_�t d�.::_n�; a nea�^,� cont,ributor to the tra�'fic on that stre�t, he didn't see where nar�int; in the front lot �tiiould ma�e it more difficult �or peonle to see. He stated that when rir. Burknolder built on the other lot, it would just continue thac f:ont yard parxing all around �hat corner. I�� saia he would have no objection. l;rs. Gabel asked ii' there ;�ras so�ne kind of code requirements for oerimeters, or if curbing was re�uired. Mr. Holden said there were no requirements for off-street parking. Air. Burkholder said it was very difficuli; in tne Vrintertime uahen the sno�,,� came to rernosae t7e snov� ii' chere v.as curbing. 'rie added iYiat tne definition Vrould be very clear i•rnen the blacktop was do�•m, and en �h:: :,id� lacing 77th n� ��:ould pai, in scrie hedges to mal:e it more aesthetically pleasing. MOTlON by Barna, seconded by P1eMel, that the Appeals Com^�ission recommend � to the City Council that the request for a front ��ard varia.nce �be approved. � Upon a voice vote, all voti.r.g a�re � tne motion carried una.~: imously. � I�ir. Plemel sta�ed that tne cit,y snould ensure tnere cvas no encroacnment on the l�' boulevard. Chairperson Schnaole informed ��ir. `t3urkholder tnat tnis �rould go before the Cit�r Council or. Au�ust lbt�. � � � � � � ' � 2. TA�LED: KL�UEST FQ.�. A�'AKI.A;��CL Or SECT10lV �1l�.053, 2, ?�'RIDL�Y CI'TY CODE� TO i�.AISi TH.��' 100 S(:UAR�, i'E�T ?�u�XL�iuI•1 SIZ� 0'r' A rREE STtiIvDINU 5IGr� IN C-2S ZOTJING (GE�vE��AL SHOPYTNU A�.EAS), TO 108 S'iUAttE r'EE`l�, TO ALLO:J A 12 S�aUAtcE r'OOT Ii�r�O��:�TION S1UN Tu BE ;�7D�.D TO AiV rXIS^tZI�U 9b S^UAUE N'OOT SIUN� LOCATED OiV TiIE SOUTH 204 t�'ErT 0�' THE EkST"r�I�LY �00 r''.��;T Or' LOT 3, ��CK 2� EAST RA�uCH ESTATrS Si;COivD 1�llliION, T�-:i; S�'il:i. �3El.dls 77?0 UNIVi�SITY AVEivUE N.E.� r'ttIllLL;S:� i�ilP�luESUTv. (:'e�uest by the To:�m Crier Pancake House� ?730 University Avenue id.r,., r'ridley� ��iinnesota S5Lt32)• r.OTI01v by Kemper, seconded by iiarna, to remove ttiis item from the table. Upon a voice vote, all voting a}=e, the r�otion carried unanimously. P•ZOTION by i3arna, seconded by Iiernper, to open the pub].ic hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye� the motion carried unanimously. ADi�11NISTRATNE STA�'r' Rr;PORT A. PUBLiC PURPOSE SEitVED BY RE�'�U1REI�IEI�T: Section 214.0953, 2, limiting size of free-standin�; signs to 100 square feet. Public purpose serveci by this section of the Code is to limit visual pollution from free-standing signs in business areas. B. STATED HAftDSHIP: Yetitioner wants to add 1?_ square foot information sign sa,ying "Open 21t Hours" to existin�; 96 square f.00t sign. Variance from 100 square it. to 108 square it. � � � !�'i•i�11c�.Y �.l,��ea�:; C��r��l:,,,�i.ori ;•;ccLiii�; ��(' Ju]_:� %7� 1)l(� P `'`" f E -f;` > C. AD211.f�I�TItA'I'IVE STAt��h' ftF,V1F:�,J: The pet�tionc�r is r.resentl,y using temnorar.y b^.nners sa,yin� "Open 21t �Eiours" whict� are considerabl,y more detractin�; tha.n the 12 square foot si�n proposed. The existin�; yb square foot sign is located ?_!� feet behi.nd the curb and is illuminated. The sign is we.11 kept and properly r►aintained. S+af£ feels th�t this i� a rea.s<�nabl� reoues't� but ��ould lil;e to encourage tt�at the addi.tiona�_ : i�;n be of such a desi�;n a:� not to de �ract froM tne a;�pearance of" �'i:e original sign. �1r. Crai.g J. Var�o, ot�mer and manager of the Toi•m Crier Pancake i-iouse, t•:as present to explain the re.quest. He apologized for not bei.ng at t�.e lasi mee�ing. }ie stated that at tne present time they had a temporary plasiic banner sa,�-irg "Open ?_1� Hours", and shokeci the ttoard a picture of the proposed sign r:nich Urould sit direct.ly belo��r the light. :Ie said tneir ontion ��ould be to take �hat liR�ht out and put the ne:�; si.gn directly underneath the original sign. I�Ir. Vargo explained the new sign �ti�ould have a bro�•m background with yellow lettering, and ��ould be r�ade by Sign Cra.fters. i�ir. Kemner asked the purpose o� tne 1_ir;�t, azzd ;�1r. Vargo said it T�:as out in :ahen the building was euilt to try to stog a dark snadow. rirs. Uabel asked if the sign had been checked out a.s far as height, and i�Ir. Vargo said it was plenty high enough, but he ciidn't know if tnere ,�ras a minimum. I��r. K°mper stated �ic had to lae 12' of'f the groa��d, �.n� i�I; .}Jargo said it would be. Chaircerson Schnabel said the preliminar,y sketcn of the sign sho�Jal it �,rould be 25' fro*n the grounu to t��e top, and the si�;n �.�ould :�easu�e �' long by 12' ?•ride. I•�Ir. Holden said the minimum I�e��;h� taas 10', and that looking at it he tnougnt there Z,Tould be adequate roon: with about t3 or 9 f eet to plav with. Chairperson SchnabEl asked if tne si�n ��rould be illuriinated, and ,•ir. Varf;o replied it i•rould. He explained there �aouid be t��o s�a?rate signs� and each side would be illur�iria�ed froi� ��rit'�in. 'rie saia it t.�ould looi: :i�ce or.e s��n. P�Ir. Holden cornmented that hc� tnought the Towr. Crier sign �-ras t�ne be�t looking of all tne ot�er ones there. r�1r. Remper a.slced t•;nat would be done t�rith the sign i.f, for some reason, th� Pancake "riouse wouldn't stay open 2!� hours. i�Ir. Vargo said tneir inten�ions were to stay open ?_11 hou.rs, but if that changed they would take it do�-�. He added that if he �•rasn ° t at that location, he taould hope t,he compan,y t•rould take it down. rSr. Holden said he dian't tnink it Vrould be out of order to add a stipulation that if the sign isn't being used it would have to be taken dot4n. rlrs. Schnabel asked �?r. riolden if this ��lould be reviet•.jed ��earl,y, and :�;r. �iolden replied he did not knoia ho�.� often it �,rould be reviewed. MO'1'ION b,y Plemel, seconded b,y Kemper, to close the public hearin�. U�on a voice� vote, all v� �� r.f- ��c,. th� moti.on carried unanimously. AIr. ;�ar•n�_ :��::d '::. �:ou1d have no objection t� t:his si�-n at all. He :��id �le thoii� ht peoplt� dri.vinr b,y on that busy street e�*ould like to know there ��as a restaurant open ^!� hours a da,y. � � l��ridlc;;� ,inpc:al.s Corn�ri:,sic;n i•icci.in,; of Jul;y 2'l, �;lt� ��,�,F: � �6 .F P�1U'1'ZOr� by Ke�p�r� ��cond�d h;� Barn?, tha.t� the An,r,e.�ls Comrt�_^^ion recomrocncl t� Ci_t.•r Coun.r,il :annroval �f the rern_��ct f�r variance t� rai�e th� 100 :��uare fPP_t, maximum size of a free-standin�; sign in C-2S zonin�; to 108 square feet� t•rith two stinulat9.ons: 1) The Cit;t Admiriistration :-h�u].d he advised that ^i.nce it is a?!1 Hour si�n, if' the busine.�� is not open 211 haur::, action shoulcl be ta_F:en to reMOVP the si�n, and ?_) The banners must come dot:m. i•ir. i-iolden su�E;e^i:ed addin�; that the add_i�iona7_ si.�;n not be an;� cicscr t'r.,�n 10' i'ro�n the center line of t��e ro ;.ci, but added th�t was pa.rt o_' t}ie Co�'-e. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting �.,ye, the motion carri.ed un?.nimousl,y. Cnairnerson �chnabel ini'ormed I�Ir. Vargo that t:�iis ��:ou7.d nota �o bef.ore t,ne City Council on August 16th for their reviewal. 3. N.�:�UEST I�Oi3 A VAi3.lAr�CE OF S�CT10N ?_05.�53, ��, (�,�) T� ��'�CE THE Y�E':rUIr�ED SIDr, Y�^�RD �';�U"�I 13 FE::'I' TO 12 FET�T 1'0 ALLO:i tii �. COi�lS`I'Ft�JCT10iJ Gr' � IiOUS� 1;tuD GA�,AUE, LOCATED 0�1 LOTS 33 Ai�iD 3�1, 31,OCK 11, SPRING Brt00K P�ZK ADDI`I'1C�;�i, THL SAi7E BEIP�G 238 ELY ST�.EET AI.B., F'rtIDL�Y, I�1.IivP1ESOTA. (Request by Rcdney Sancimon, 3511 - 173rd Lane At.;�1., linoka, I•iinnesota 55303). r�10TI01'� by Barna, seconded 'ny t�abel, to open the nublic hearing. L'pon a voice vote, all vo�ting aye, ti�e motion carried unanimously. AD'i�iZNTSTRATIVE STt1t�'F REPO�.T A. PJ3LIC Ft3RPOSE SERVED BY RE��UIRr.�r".:ir.P�'i': 5ection ?_OJ.053, u(�,')• �n loi;s up to 60 i'eet in �s�idth ivithout an attached garage, at least one side yard of 13 feet is required in order to allota access to the rear yard detached garage. B. STATED HAPDS:iIP: Lesser house size would be too restrictive and petitioner is contracted to build tne house which is �;roposed. C. ADI-1ItvIS'1'RkTIVE STAr'F' R�;VIE;��t: 238 Ely Street, IV.E. is a fi0 foot wide lot. The petitioner has been issued a building permit for this lot to build the size of house proposed, provided::he be granted a va.riance to do so. Should the reouest be denied, he U�i7_1 be obligated to reduce the size oi the house by one foot. Apparently the petitioner is already contracted to build the house as proposed. The house to the East (228 Ely Street) is Iocated ten feet from the corimon property line on the side for whieh the variance is reauested. If approved, tris would leave 22 feet bett-reen structures with an intervenin�; drivet��ay. The plan shows a door opening into this drive�•ray area on the ?�lest side of the proposed house. This doorway should be deleted from the house plan in order to avoid limiting this driveF�ay area. Staff fee].s that the nei�hbor to the East would be the most interested part,y ir� this rec�uest. Staff' has no objection to this variance request. Rev. Sandmon was present to explain his request. Mrs. Gabel asked if this house I� was on the same street that the alley vacation request was on, and Rev. Sandmon replied it was. He explained he wanted to build a housP and garage and was just I� ' 1�'ri�ll��y AF��cal.:; �Cc�rrun�i:s��ion i•9eetit��; of' J�aly 27� i9�7f� i'a�;r; 7 one fooi; shart of codn. �I� �tat;ed he had 12' and he Ilf'��P.f� ] 3' . He :>aid his house was 3�i' lon�, �nd showed �n a dia�ram where the drivewa,y and �_a.ra�e would be. He said thc garage �r�ould be back 32'� and he eliminated tnP kitchen door so there WOUZ(� bP nothin� in the wa,y. i�Ir. Holden exolained if 't:r:at door t�rere to sti•ring out it wnuld l.imit tt�e alrea.dy :>.mall driving space. 1-Sr. Plemel asked if there titi�ould be a y�roblem dronning the one foot, a.��d Rev. S•+.n�mon said there i•�o�i� ci be. �ie stated the kitci�en Y�a.� c�uit� s.:�a�l a�reac:;�, and ii, would also ir:ake an acidition�:,l eXpense. Chairperson Schnabel said that according to the Staf.f' Report the existing house next door is 10' f.rom tne lot line, so ii this request :tiras gran'�ed� tnere taould sti� 1 be 22' bet.��een the t:�:o structures. ttev. San�3rnon com::ente : th�.t he had talked to the neighbor it would affect, and he said tnat as far as he :•ras concei•ned there t•ras no problem. P�1rs. Schnabel asked if he intended to live in this house himself, and he replied he did. Chairnerson Sc'r.nabel said that it senmed the onl;� otner alterr.ati•ie ,�r�ulr be to as�: hirn to remove one f'oot cff of the bedroom �ide of the nouse, ria.�i.ng the bedrooms 1' shorter. P•ir. �arna pointed o.ut that the b�drooms were not very big to be�in with. P�irs. Scnnabel asked ho�a soon he plar.ned to begin construction, and Rev. S�dmon replied as soon as possible. iie added 'ne nad already started on the gara�e. ri0TI0`:� by Barna, seconded by Gabel, to close the. public hearing. Upon a voice vote, a:ll voting aye, the mation carried unanimously. i•�r. P?.emel cor��.��ented that he ;,roul.d be in favor o� tnis variance =in�e it t•ras only 1'. ChairpPrsan Scnnabel si;uted that in addition to tr.e �ar�sni�s �.:hich Staff had stated, it should be noted that it would be sor�e��Jr12i. of a;:nancial hardsnip to the getitioner to reduce the size at' the nouse as ch2nging plans t,rould cost more. r10'1'ICN by Plem21� seconded by Barna, that the �ppeals Commission approve trie reauest for var:�ance. Upon a voice vot�:�, all. vuti��; a,ye, t'�? ^�otior, carri�:i unan�.r�ously. Nlrs. Gabel stated ttlat she would like to comment that she tnou�;�� the a50 for requests for variances for residential purposcs was ridiculous anu some adjust�ment �hould be made. i•Ir. k�arna agreed that for ot•mer-occupied iiomes� $50 was excessive. i�;r. Ker�per asked who ch�nged the fee from �15 to :�50� and Mrs. Gabel replied the City Council. Pi0T10� by Uabel, seconded by Barna, that the City Council reconsider the fees for variance requests on owner-occupied residential properties as the Appeals Comrii�sion feels the $50 fee reauired is excessive and feels �?5 MaxiMUm would be sufficierit. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, t.he motion carried unanimously. �G ' }�'ridlc:� Ap�>e.ii;; E��r:�rii ; :irm :;r:��tinf; o; ,J:il;; �'7 � 7-`,�7f� P;��;e � 6 �{ ' HFCrTVE TtiT? 1"F�.�O FR.()P� MAYOft 1�Jf�:F; DA'I'!�,D JULY 15, 197h, ON TH�: UTILI7.A`I'TON OF lt0� TA'1'S : Chair�erson Schnabel said that she had gone back 3nci r�vi.ewed all di:scuss:ion that has occurred on 1.�0' lots, ar�►d there were t?•relve �en�ra.te ti.mf:s thi� discus:,ion had come up. She stated she re-read ever,ythin� triat was relative that the Appeals Comriission �iscus�ed and that other C�mriission> discussed and brought to the attent.ion of ttzr Appeals Cornrnission. I� She stated that first oi' all� the Appeals appreciation to 1�Sayor Nee for ta'.�cin� the communication was enlightening, arid more �, � they have received sometimes. She stated with some and disagreed �aith others. �� ' �J �� ' � Gomriission should express their time to write to them. She said the in:ormative than so;�e other inforrnation she aopreciated tne remark� and concurred Chairperson Schnabel said she had rnade some notes on her letter, but it might be appropriate, if the other members wished, tnat this Cor�mission draft sorrie response to send to Mayer ivee and to the other people ��rho received lii� letter so they o�ld understand this Co.mmission's thougnts also. 2�1r. i lemel asiced if it would be necessary to ansk�er, and ;�rs. Scnnabel said it �,ras her feeling there were some inaccuracies, and if the other people had the benefit of the Apneals Commi:,sion's position it might clear it up a litile. Chairperson Schnabel said i,hat on the first page of r�is lc}tter, riayor Nee talke�i about the City Policy and said he kne�r of no such polic,y. She stated she thought this came from tne very first ti;ne there was a request on Lhese lots �I'ebruary 10) and there was a stat,ement made in the Adrninistrative Staff Hevieti: t•rhich said "This would establish the policy to be follot•red on other �t0� lots". hlrs. Schnabel said tnat �erhaps they slipoed into using the 1�lguage of CiLy Policy as a result of that. She said that she didn't think they, at any time, felt there zaas a City Policy; that tiaas tany they �aan�ed ot:�er Commissions to look at 1�0' lots so they cauld find out w?:at other people felt about building on these lots so a policy could be established. P�Irs. Schnabe:L said she concurred with i�iayor �Iee's state:�ent that there is no City Policy, and thought p�rhaps he misunder�tood the Comrnission's u�e of the term. She continued that on page 2 Ma,yor lvee stated "Consider what's happening in Mi.nneapolis, ��here many homes were built on !�0 foot fronta.ges, and had the added imoortant advantage of excellent back alley service. These are the neigh- borhoods that nave had the iaorst history of urban decay and population �light." Mrs. Schnabel asked if this could be substantiated. She said she didn't know if this was necessarily true, and questioned that statement. rirs. Schnabel added that ma,ybe the ria,yor has those iigures, but she kne�a o� areas iahere there were !t0' lots that were well-maintained and not in a s�ate of decay. Chairoerson Schnabel said that further down on page 2, under #2, the hla,yor wonders if that is a false economy. She said that her only thought on that is that the statement was made in one of the reviews that tne ��ater and sewer connections were already in, and she di.dn't knaw if that Uras an economic factor to consider�. She continued that he states that putting in a$3�,000 house on a 1�0 foot lot� chances are that the taxes it generated k�ould not pay the cost of public utilities. Mrs. Schnabel said she didn't have those figures and didn't know what those homes would p�y. She said she tended to agree that two forty-foot parc�ls make a� �ood 80' site� and that was the way the Commission felt about it; they would prefer the lots be larger than Lt0'. ' �. . - , . . . , _ . i��ri��lt;y A},t ��a,.s C�t��m�a ;�_:;i, ;;��:��rL:inF; oi ,1�.1,;� ?7, ��,'f> � P��e � � I Mrs. Srhnahel stated that on pat�e 3 the Mayor said it was unfortunate that the A�neals Comrnission did not have the same inf'ormation package on this question tr,at the City Council had. She said he was corrECt Ltiati :it i�Tas urii'ort,unate, �:d th:.s Commis>si.on war very unhapn,y tne,y did not have the s�-�e infor^��ti.on t�e City Council ha� u:hen they 1•:ent into t?�:.s i^��.tter. I�'^. Ho �_den nassed �ut to the member.^ r>f the Cem-~� ssi.�>n a Mc:r:o i'ror� Dic:� �o��iech dated �'�nril 30 1�7.h on �;ubst�nr�r�? !;n fnot lot,�-. ?�"rs� CTah�,l comm�nted ths_�t �':E:'e .:�r�n't t:1:t :"?.Il;i 1-t�)� 101,., n;r t,:"Ir.�n:�P1V�:.`':� '3.Clci ,:1=31'l�' O.f t.'lr�;-t? ,rc�7'(: O2'1 COi!1E�?"�. i� rs. S^hnabel ae�ked it' t'-icre •�.ere m�:ry � onj; �`-� „. !��' lots together, be�au: �: �.^_�,r•c3._:�,� to the memo there were not. T;r. :?olden said tnat accordin� La the l�st tney nad, there �rere t;��o, or at the mo�t, four ? ets in �. block tn3t :��^re aajacent. �nairperson Schnabel said tne Council did nave additional information tr�a't the Appeals Commission did. not have at the time they were actin� on the variance request, but hc�r that would have af'fected their decision, she didn't know. She sta�ed sne ;,nougrt they still would have asked the Plannin� Cor�r�ission ta ask the subcornmissions to do a review of it. :•Ir�. Schnabel said that under �1� on page 3, the Nlayor says "As a simple, practical legal matter, the City cannoi defend the kind of' discriminatory criteria reeommended �y the Appeals Commissicn." She said. she ques�ioned that statement, and didn't kn�w exactly what he meant uy discriminatory criteria. She said L'ne Appeals �or�mission dia not establi.sh an,y criteria, but the PI_anning Comriission did. `�Irs. Schnabel explained th� Pl.anning Commission adopted some tentative guidelines which they sent on to the City Council, and the Appeals Corunission agreed �rith wnat the Planning Corunission had said; bu� as f'ar• as �ne Rppeals Coruniss�.on is concerned, the�T didn't establish the cx�iteria. She said that type of sta�ement was t'r:e reason they snould respond to his memo. ------------ - _ _ __ -- _ . .- _ - ;:r. Barna said tnat �iayor Nee had explained tnis to h3_m last nigi:t; he had ;lisunderstood :ahat had beeri said or had i.�:pronerly remembered it. :ir. :Barna said t�at the ?�tayTor t-ras not aware of t"e eaistence of the tentative guidelines or the recommendations and policY statement on the development oi !�0 foot lots in the City of Fri.dley (containeci in t'rie minu'tes of the A�rs.l 7, 1976 Pianning Commission meeting). �ir. Barna said t',:e T�;�yor T�:as addressin� himseli to the Hppeals Comrlission minutes of that April meeting basically, and those caere the guidelines received from the Cit,y Council. ;�ir. Kemper said it would appear as though riayor i��e had put his thougnts on paper, and though he may have been misinformed, he does have his tnou�hts doUm. Mr. Kemper said i�. seemed to him they should someho��T get.the proper people together and establish a�a.ideline tha� enough people taould agree on to become policy. He added that �ariting a letter to the P•Zayor might set the record straigzt, but it wouldn't accomplish that. Chairrerson Schnabel said she was glad the riayor iyrrote the letter because it gave t�em a better idea of tahy he voted no to the requests f'or variances. She Gaid sne thought his points k*ere we11 taken, and +here ti•ras still time to look at tnis. Sne added she thought r2r. Kemper had a g�od suggestion� and said they should understand better what everybod,y else was thinking. � � ..,i,' � . ,� .. . , .�.� .. � , , � i r1 dI ��,� �,F,1;r:a�.c' C: ,._ ,..,.�I.o, :c � tr:E, �,. Ju7 ,� �7F; �7 r.,�.�. l0 6 J .t. Mr. Pl.emel st�ted he th�uE=ht the,y should continue their work and keep those five �uidelines in mind on an,y 11�' lot vari_ance that m:ight come up in the future. � . Mr. Barna asked what problems t.here ha{3 bF;en in the ��ast w�t�i 5G' lots, and Mrs. Schnabel said she would have to go back and loak at the requests. 1�1r: Barna state�d he ot��ned two houses s:_ttin�; .on f'�.fty foot lots �nr, ne saw no problcm. ?�1r�. cchnabel ��.id ti:ey cid have nei�-�bors cor�pl�.ining on some ��' Z.Ot. T'BCiliGSt.S. i::'. IJ',`lI":13 i3.�� f'I:I3t, t.;:�.' M?�:"_7?'1T.j' O{' ;1:�US��c i.I'i .�1VE',TV1P.lJ ^�E'" :t.`: were on 50' lots, and the bigger lots were uncommon. l�:rs. Uabel said the point .t��as well taken. Shc siated Lhat if t:�e� kep� ;aorking �,Tith t;�ese lots and the siz� kept getting srnaller and sr��ller, tnere ��:ould �e problems. • P�1rs. Schnabel said. t.he i�layor had stated that trie neople iaho built here have an investment in F?'id7.ey�s housing, and that t�;a_s a good poi.nt. i��rs. Uabel agreed it was a valid statement. Chai.rperson Schnabel said tnat on pa�e 5, 2nd paragraph, it said tne yppea'.s Commission recammended reduction in lot size requirements. She saia sne didn't think they had ever done that. She read the second to last paragraph on page 5, which said "Perhaps the Pl�nning Depa.rtment, the Plannzng Commission and Comr�unit,y Developmen� can come up with a netia approacn. Eut I don't think a policy change of this magnitude shoulc� evolve through tne process of variances by the Appeals Cortr:is�ion. ",•;rs. Schnabel said .tnst t-aas ex.�ctly the�r point; that �aas exactly why the A�peals Comr�ission asked the Planning Corim�.G.�;ion a.na subcommissions to re;rieti�a �his �.r�d come up t•ritn some guidelines. She said tne Appeals Comriissior. didn't want to hancile this in the i'irst place, but did want some guideli.nes on it.� , I��irs. Schnabel said that ii' tr.e rest of the �eard would concur, she would draft some type of response to i�ayor Nee clari�'ying some of these paints �.nd suggesting that theytry this a�ai.r.; and see if theti couldn't get some better guidelines � going to deal k�ith this. Sr:e stated that ttie Corunission probabl,y agreed �•ri �h some of the th�ngs he said, and he brought u-� sorie ne:•r points to consider, so it should be discussed again. S-n° added that perhaps at the next Plunning � Conunission meeting tne,y might get. a oetter feel as to hota it �:•as receiveu, uu� . personally, siie wc,uld like to mai:e a response to the )_etter to clarif�r some points. �_� , � ' NOTI01v by tsarna, seconded by GaUel, that the Apgeals Corunission receive the letter to the Appeals Commission froM i�t�or ivee. dated Julv 1�, ' 97b on t��e utilizstion of Lt0' lots. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOUxNr;EivT : rlr. Keriper asked what happened to the rec�uest that t�ie mer�bers ot' the Anpeals Cor�r►ission receive copies of the Cit,y Council minutes concerr�ing actions bv this Corunission. rir. liolden said they ��ere going to' start sortin�; utit t.�ie infarmation, and thev would bc getting them along with the otizer information f.'or the next meeting. • Chairperson ScYinabel pointed out that there �aere two items the,y handled toni�;ht that would �;o on to the City Council, so they would li.lce a review oi' that. r'rid7 e;,� A��p�.a-1 s!;ommi_°;sion 1°Ineti nF', of Ju 1,y '�'r, :� n7f, P��*e 1l P•ir. i�crnper statcd that the onc m�:i.lirl€; ne receive;c� �-:orlce�'. ver,� well and rras rcuch better t}�, ;n r•ecci_��inry one le�;ter �ver;r d��;; . 1rr. T'1.cmr�1 add��' tha.', it :•�o,ild �1so save some postage. Mr. Holden said they would use the same method n�xt time. I�,OT10N b,y Kemper, seconded k�y Ga.bel, to ad,journ tY�e Apneals Cor�r�,i�sion rneeting of July 27, 1976 at 9:32 P.I•7. Upon a v�ice vot�, a�_1_ voting ?,;;e, tt�e Motion carried unanimous.ly. Respectfull,y submitted, • /!f %lT,/ % �/ 1 X.�%�/ l P Y.t' � Sherri. 0'Donnell Recording Secretary 6K 1 __..-- � �� v � o �_� � �'�� - � � ) , � '� , � � .� �� r� � . � + � . � _ c�,� � � , _.� . . �� A �� ; � . --� �'� ��- � • TM� .J �� . � � �'`s � � ;-:, � � � �� . � � � � � � �� I: ! :� �•�--�..=-:c_ =-- ; � ccy 0 �► o � �.� �±, �� . �� -��i �� f r � � - ��r =. � �� `� � � � �� L � � � � I�//vC� �� l��.^ � �, e�o�T G�' /�C�,. • p�t��7 �XO� ��v a �/��.� � '• I , 6 L �� r t,'`�'' � CI!'Y UF FftIDL'r.Y 6 r1 �,' YLANNING CUI,?�;JSSIOP� MI;FTIP�G nuGUSm 1�, 1976 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDF:R: Chairperson Harris called the rneeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Harris, Bergman, Lambert (attend�ng for Shea), Langenfeld, Schn abel Members Absent: Others Present: Peterson Jerrold Boardman, City Planner APPROVE PLAN:�ING COP-II�SIS5ION 1�4INUT�S: JULY 28, 1976 __._.___-._.-- Mrs. Lambert said that regarding the third paragraph on page 3, the Fine Arts Committee rzas not the onl.y active subcommittee, but the Youth Project Co:�L�'I�.lilip� was also very active. She also pointed out in tne same pa.agrapn that Human Relatiuns should be changed to iiuraan Resources. ' MOTION by Sc!inabel, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Ce:�.�nzssion minutes of July 28, 1976 be approved as corrected. lipon a voice vote, all voting aye� the motion carried unanimously. RECETVE P.^�.R.Y�S AidD RECREATION COh��1ISSTON I�tINUT�S: J'uTT�Y 26, 1976 Mrs. Schnabel stated she had a question concerning page 3 of their minutes� under item 2. She said the question was raised concernin� tne soccer field at Locke Parlc, and I�ir. Iiarris said that money had been appropriated for it in the budget. However, she said, when �he went through the budget she did not see any money appropriated for it and wondei•ed if that was an error or if she had difficulty finding it. rlr. Boardman said that Parks and Recreation had asked for it last year and it was cut out by the City Council. He stated that this year he thought they asked for it again, but he was not sure. He suggested that would be a good thin� to bring up at the next Planning Commission meeting when a representative from Parks and Recreation would be in attendance. Mrs. Schnabel said she had raised the question at the last Commission meeting of what the dollar amount of the total Parks and Recreation budget was. She stated that she }iad added the fi�ures up herself, and thought the other members would be interested. She explained she had t�ken the top dollar amount of everythin�, which didn't include any monies that might come back to them .through concessions or other resources, and it came to $l�td�,bl3. 0 e�-?.�...,,� t '1G"!"-�!;�g .' Mrs. Schnabe7. stated tha1; her next question in relation to th�t would be, is the Plannin� Cor.imission to make any decisions on this bud�et or is it totally within the realm of the Parks and iiecreation Department? Chai.rperson Harris stated.tnat he thougnt the CY��xrter was set up so that Parks and Recreation proposes a bud�;et, but the approval of that bud�;et �was complE:tely up tt� the City Council. iie added that if rirs. Schnabel wisned to discuss it, they would be within the realrn of operation. Mrs. Schnabel said t}�at if the Planning Commission was responsible to r�ake any cornments on it or ask any questions about it, she would feel inadequate in asking t!�o�e questions as s:�e didn't know F:hat the past procedure had been with rega:d to Parks and P.ecreation. She continued that if they were required to do that� then she, personally, would like some budgets from other yeaxs to make comparisons. Mr. Board.-nan said that the Par�s and Recreation budget had never been revieaed by the Planning Co:n.�ission bef'ore. He stated the onl;� reason it goes before the Planning Commission ��as ta see if it fit in with the adopt��d goals and objECtives of the com�nunity. In other words, he said, �f the;� said they needed a terinis court and according to the goals and objecti�es it was not needed, it would then be up to the Planning Com�ission to say tha� wasn't an object�ve of the city to provide that. � He said that this is �;here the. realm. of t:ie Plann�.ng Commission would cone in, but not necessarily an iter; by item budgeting goir.g through past budgets, etc. Air. Boardman said he felt that would be very 1�:eighiy to go through t�ao Commission processes of going over a budget and then to the City Council. i;e added that Parks and Recreation was supposed to be a responsible enough Co�ission to promote this with just a review by the '.'lanning Co:�mission as fax. a� the application to th:: overall goals of tne ci�cy. 2�irs. Schnabel said she appreciated that explanation� She added she was not aware of the process and wanted to be better informed i£ they ��ere called upon to do any-thing wit7 it. Mr. Langenfeld asked to be corrected ii' he was i,Tron�, but said he thought that this was nothin� but a proposed cash outlay and guide. Mr. Boardrnan said these were outlay costs--�what Parks and Recreation ielt they needed to develop these things. He explained the Cit,y Council would now take a look a� it and cut it in areas and add in otlier areas. rir. Boardman fur�her explained t'r,e Pla..r��ir.g Commission should revie�a it according io the ove:al7. views of tne comrnur.ity. He said the whole purpose of the Planning Commission :-ras �.n over-view Co^unission. He added �hat all the other Coi;limissiorn below them wer� to work on implementation of policies and then the Planning Commission was to see that t:�e implementation was carried out and to see that they were going in the right.direction. Mr. Bergman said that he noticed that out of thirteen park areas, the Parks and Recreation bud�et only provided funding f'or numbers one througii six. rir. Boardr�an explained there were six maintenance a.reas in the ci.ty, and the budget was developed according to those maintenance areas. ri�•. Ber�man asked if he was sayin� that in udctition to the map which had thirte�n areas, tt:ere was another map which had six areas, and T:r. Boardrnan said that was correct. � Mr. Ber�;man asked if it was the long-ran�e Parks �North Park be �� nature center, and rir. 13oardman � said that all parks within the communi�y except ' , and Recreation Plan that Innsbruck anstiaere.d not necessarily. He Locke Park, North Park and the 6 fJ �'°" "+�i i Plac�niii�; Commi::sia� M�eting - Au�;ust� � Yage Island of Peace had been piver, to those th:irteen neif�hborhood project committees to see if the uscs �wit,hin the p»rk area were cornpat,ible with the nei�hborho��ds. He added that they were waitin� for response tow:ird the end of September on those. N,r. Ber�;man said ne noted there wris no money indicated in the budget toward Innsbruck North Park, and Mr. Boardman said he thought it was.just about completed. MOTIOP� by Bergman, seconded by Lan�enfeld, that the Plannin� Commission receive the minutes of the Yarks and Recreaf;ion Commission meeting of Ju].y 26, 1976. Mrs. Schnabel asked if the motion :.hould state they could ho�d additional questions until the next meei;ing. Chairperson Harris orought to the Commission�s attention Item No. 6 on the a.genda, which concerned rev�.ewing the Parks a-�d Kecreatzon Commission minutes of July 6th and July 1.2th, 197b, and said that particular item could be tabled until the next re�ular rr,eeting. rirs. Schnaoel pointed out that the question she had asked earlier about the soccer field would be included in tne July 26th minutes, and Chairperson Harris suggested she make a note of it and bring it up at the next regular meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE APPEAIS COP-'��IISSION MIIv'UTFS: JULY 27, 1976 Mrs. Schnabel said that she ��ould Iike io bring to the attention of the Planni.ng Comini$sion a motion that was passed by the Appeals Commission on the bottom of page 19`. She expla�ned the Ci.t;T Council had raised t}ie fees r�ithin the city recently� and it was the feelir�g of t;ie rlem'�ers oi the Appeals Cornmission that on owner.-occupied residenti.al properties the �50 fee from $15 was excessive� and thougtit �25 m�imum would be a su.fficient fee. She explained that tYiey asked t•}iat the City Council reccnsider that one fee. ?�irs. Schna�el said that to give them an e�:ample, at their July 27tn r�eeting t.hey had a request for a variance of one foot by a property owner. She said it was felt that for that property oV*r,er to pay $�0 for one foot appeared to be an excessive amount of money. � � Chairperson Harris asked how those fees t•:ere arrived at, and Air. Boardman replied they t.re1•e arrived at according to Staff costs. He explained that i,�hether the variance was for one foot or one hundred ieet, the same a�mount of notices had to be sent out and there was the same arnount of t�ork as far as Staff operation � costs went. Mrs. Schnabel said the Appeals Conm�ission realized that at the time. tioi,rever, she said, they did feel th��t on t•hat particular section of otianer-occupied residential properties the fee was oxcessive, and they had no ' quarrel with industri.al or anything else. rir. Boardman added that the fees were a7.so comparable to the community fees. ' Mrs. Schnabel sa.id she wanted to bring it to the attention of the Planning Commissioi� as i,he members of the Appeals Com�nission WAI1t.P,C� t0 express their feelings on it. Chairperson Harris said it was so noted. ' MOTTON by Schnabel, seconded by Ber�man, that the Pl��ning Coiru;iission receive the minutes of the Appea?s Conunission meetin� of July 27, 197b. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye, the motion carried unnnimously. , • 1 I � ,� . �. � 1t�(; 1 6_ P , TA�3LF�'1)• I�'U��LTC 111�;ARTW�;: �;O1�J �InI�,RAT10?J OI' A PR1�,1,7�P�17NAftY PLAT, P.5. �/"16-OS � INIJ;�tsItUCK il(>it7';; iti�;NLI�`!' '1'i{� itl� !+i)i)1.'1'.IOi; i: ' � ' ` , '.,1 �. � '1 I��..t1tt�;I., �1. �'l+t�ft ll,�.Ji•,,�I, t i!I' CUitl'OItA'1'101J: iieing a replat o� Lots 1 to inclu�ive, tslocYS 11 tnrough 2�i� r�nci also part of Lot l, Block 28; :I:rinsbruck I�orth Townhouses Third Addi.tion, i,o a11ow ch�nges in the size of �arages, �;enerally located on '� the tiv'est side oS East Bavarian Pass and South of Neister Road N.E. � ' Public Hearin� open. Mr. Board�an explained that Darrel A. Rarr Development Corporation was tryin�, to wor1c out some arra.nE„ernents with the Totimhouse Association, and requested that this item be tabled again. Mr. Langenfeld raised the question of how long something like this could be tabled, and %Ir. Boardrnan replied about sixt;y days. . Mrs•. Schnabel said she �rould lil;e to relay somethin� that she thought was � rather interesting to the Comriission. She said tha� as she drove out ilorth Innsbruck Drive, the City of Ir`ew Brigtiton's survey cre�� was surveying the road at the Fridle,y rorder. Wriether or not they were going to do anyt!:ing on it, she didn't kn��r. She also said she wondered wnether or not part of the sti.pulation � of the Darrel A. Farr Corporation proceeding taith building the to�,�nhouses was that the,y should grade out North I.�nsburcY Drive, and said it was her understand- ing that a culvert slzould be put in the lo�r spot which water is draining into ' currently. r:rs. Schnabel said that gerhaps since they ali•ea_dy have a model t;:zilt and it V�as nearir,g final stages, they should be reappraised of that stipulation. Mr. Bergman stated that each meeting they had this item on the agenda, typically as number one, and each m,eeting thcy spent tirne on it. He said ��e would like it removed from �he agenda until Darrel F�rr Cor�oraticn indicated some further interest. Chairperson Harris said he thought because oi the time element involved, since they were getting close to the time l�mit when they would have to reapply, they should table it until th.e next meeting. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Com^iission table the Public Hearing on consideration o.f a preliminar,y plat, P.S. rr76-0„ Innsb��uck I�orth Replat Third Addition, b1r Darz•el A. Farr Develop:�ent Corporation, ��rith the Public Hearing open, until the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote� all voti.ng aye, the motion carried unanimously. PUi�LIC HEARIr1G ; REt?I1EST FOR A SPECIAL iISE F^ Ri�IIT � SP. ;f76-11, BY JOSI:PH SINIGAGLIO : I'er r'ridley City Code, Section 205 0'i, 'L, a, to allow ttie construction oi a second accessory buildin�, a 21� ft. by 32 ft. detached gara�e, on Lots 1£3 and 19, Block 8� Plymouth Addition, the sarie being l�715 3rd Street N.�. rir. and Mrs. Joseph Sinigaglio were present. TIOTION by Schnabel., seconded by �3ergman, that the Planning Commission open the Public Iiearing on a request .for a special use permit, SY �76-11, b,y Joseph Sini�;arlio. Upon r� voice voi;e, all votin� �1�e, Clinirperson Harris declared the PuUZic Hearin� open nt �3:00 Y.r1. � � : !'.''....�..., .�� plAnnin�; Comrnission rlec�tin�; - Au�;u�t lt� i9�� Yag� 5 1 '� Mr. T3oardman e:cplaincd that thi s taa^ a re�uest; for r� speci.:�l use permit for 2!t' X 32.' detached f;ar��;c. He �aid the applicant presen�:l.y has un attached gara�;e to the buildin�;, and the 1ot that he is on is S0� X 129', which made � it about a 10,U00 square foot J.ot. .}�e �tateci that this was in the Plyrnouth ', � Addition, and there have been several reqi�ests in that area for �arages of ihis size. I�1r. Boardman stated ihe applicant said he has about five cars, the second accessory building would be used as a gara�e. Ile added that he ,� driven by the property and }le had no problem i�ri.th granting the application. a and had Mrs. Lambert stated shc had driven by the property and it looked to her Iike there were fences and things to thc ed�;e on eitner side of i,he property, and � asked how they proposed to get to the bacic. P•Sr. Sinigaglio replied he �rould remove �,t�e fence on the IYcrth side to �et access. He added that his currenl; garage was on i;he South side, and presented the Corimission iaith a dra��ing of � his proposal. iie said 'ne had fio plat or survef. . Mr. •Boardman said that as far as setback requirements i�rent, r1r. Sinigaglio , would be allot�red to go dorm to three feet on the property line with a survey, and without a survey it t��ould he �z feet setback. �;r. Sini�aglio said he didn't ]�o�r. �ti�here his lot line Vras, but just took it for granted the telephone � pole was the 1ot line. i�ir. Boax�an iniormed hiM that he really should get a survey on the property before the garage was built in case a mistake was made, as it could ma.�:e a difference in selling ihe proper�y. �� J � ,� � ('hairperson Harris asked t��hat `�e Vras planning to do �,rith the garage, and 2•ir. Sinigaglio replied tha�; he had several cars thai T�rere sitting in his yard. He said he didn't s,rant to sell �,rem a.nd they ��ere mare or less deteriorating. He explained tncy were vinta.ge cars, atid �his s�ras his hobb�-. He further expla�.ned he couldn't �et in his present garage because he kept his snoh*blower, table sal�s etc. :.n there, and he neecled the e�:tra room. :ir. Sinigagl:io said the garage zaould be 2L�' X 24' , and the last 8' on tYie Sou �h end xould be enclosed like a pat,io or amusement room. Chairperson I�arris asked if he was planning on having utilities in this strueture� and rir. Sini�a�lio replied he i•rould have electricity. i�ir. Harris asked how large the attached garage was that he presently had, and�i•1r. Sinigaglio replied the garage itself was about 18' X 21.�' .:?e explained he had a fire 1•�all which put a breeze�.Tay bet�reen the house and �arage, and that cut doi�rn on his gat age area. Mrs. Schnabel asked if there was a limitation or restriction on a secondary use buildin� as far as corribining livzng quarters per se and garage space. t•ir. Boardman said there was no restriction as to t�rhat it saas to be used for. Mrs. Schnabel then asked if someone could tilen build a secondar�* use building and use it as livin� quarters. Pir. Boardman replied no. tIe explained the code said an accessory use was something like privately�ot,med recreational facilities such as swimmin; pools, tennis coui•ts, et.c., which are for 1;he convenience of the residents and their gues�;s. Chairperson iiarris said he thought i;hey would have a hard time �tretching th.�t to livin� quarters. Mr. Langenfeld pointed out that the �ctitioner indica�ed the use of the gara�,e and that is iah,y the Special Use Permi_t was beinr requested, and if the special use was �;ranted then the City ��rould liave con�:rol over that particular piece of 6 C.1 ,�� --� � �` Y1�nnin� Conu��ission Meeti.nE; - Au�ust i, 197 � property. He stated he noticed th:�t 19r. Sinig��lio had a loi ot neighbors, a.nd asked what their �eneral feelinF;s were. Mr. Sini�a�lio replied th3t his nei�r.bors on both si�ies hzd asked if he had an,y ul�,erior motives for building, but he st2.ted he did not. He said he just wanteci to get the cars out of the yard as they were deterior�tin�, and stated that the nei�hbors said tney didn't care �1hat he did in his back yard as long as he didn't put the garage in the front yard. He stated he didn't believe there were any objections, and fe2t that getting the cars out ot si�hi would be an improvement. ?3r. Langenfeld aslced what his hobby was, and 1�Ir. Sinigaglio replied :�e wor :ed on the cars he had. He explained �,hat parts were aifficult to find, �nd o•�er the last cauple of years he orould buy a bumper here and a gril� there. fie s aid he would just 7.eave the cars in the garage and t�e them out �nen the weather was nice. r:r. LangenSeld as�:ed if the garage would 'be cor�patible wi{;a the rest of the house, and i�ir. Sinigaglio replied it woulci. :-ie said �t would 'aave vertical �ood like nis home and the same roofinc, and �aould essentiall;� look like a scale model of his house but it ti•�ouldn't be as long. Mrs. Schnabel noted that he did the reconstruction for his ot::� personal benefit, but asked if h� iaas in the business of doing this type of ;ao^:�: for ot�er people or do�ng it �•ritih the intent oi reselling the aui;o-�cbilies. ?�x. Sinigaglio replied re �ras not, and said the cars ��ere just for his ot:�n use :•rizen 'r�e fe? t like it. He explai.ned he did the work in his �i�rn garage now, but would like to be able -�o jack up the car and leave it there instead of takino it up �zd down every night. �� Mr. Bergman asked if Mr. Sinigaglio hired someone'to c�me in and ;:*ork on t::e I autoT,obil�s, ard he answered he did nct. I�s. Ber�r�an s2id 1-_e had no otYier concerns i:it'� r�gard to the general plan and concept, but ��us a l�ttle concerned about the dirensional. validity. Iie stated tner� was r.o :e�is��red survey of � the lot, and he V,as not sure that other tnan approv-ing tne concept in general there zaas any ��ore they could do prior to City Cot:ncil revie;. wi �'r.out veri�ication or dimensions. � � Chairperson Harris stated they could send this on to Council ,�rith their recorn;nendations ana stipulationss and one of those stipulations could be that �he petitioner get a surcey before he �oes to City Council. '�:r. �oard.:�an said he real].y �idn't know if they needed a survey be�ore they goi to Council. Ne explained their main concern was that they don' � t�,�:e up ,~:�ore th�z 25;: of their lot. I:ir. Haxr�s said he thought it ��ould save a 1ot of time if before thi's got to Council there was a survey and all these thin,5 were chec;ed. Air. Lan�enfeld said he would li�e to support the su�gestion and com�ents re�:arding tne survey, and added he ti�ras sure Council would ask Mr. Siniga�lio to do that anyway. MOTIOiJ by Lar.�;enfeld, seconded by Bergman, that the PlGnninb �omr�.ssion close tiie Riblic Hearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, SP �/76-11, by Joseph Sinigaglio. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairt.ersen Harris declared the l'�iblic Iiearing closed at 8:21 P.ri. MOTIO� by Ber�;man, seconded by L�nbert, that the Planning Cor.nission recoi:umend � to .Cot�icil approval of the request for a Special U:e Pernit, SP �76-1I, by Joseph Siniga�lio, per F�idley City Code, Section 20�.051, 2, A, to allow the �� '� i �..� Y , '� r 1'1<uinlnj; �oucnL:.s�.o►i t�c��Lin�; - Au�;u:; L[1� 19 j� Y��;e 7 eon,truction of a secotid acces:,ory buildin�;, ft 71t i't. by 32 ft. detachE:d �ara�e, on Lots lf� and 19, F31ock 8� Pl.yrnouth Addition, thc same bein� l�71S 3rd Street N.�;., in�icatin�; general concurrence with the re�uest �znd the • propo:�ed cons�ruction ar�3 u^�a�e, but subject to a dimensional verification throu�h lot survey prior to City Council review. � . � •• Mr. Langenfeld said 'ne tended to want to indicate "if possible ". He said he � got the fceling t}ie�r were pusning these people for a survey, and �;hey should have one, t-,ut ::��ndered �rhat ��ould happen if they couldn' i, co*�e up with one _ before this k�n;, to �.,ouncil on Aug��zst 16tt�. Cnairperson Harris said they could leave it �.s one of their stipulations, and if the City Cauncil wanted � to cha.nge tnat, it �:as tneir prerogative. Mr. Harris said 'ne would lil:e to recomrr�end ihat t�e m�tion include something about limitation of the structure tor any future use �s a rome occunation. 1��r. Bergman said he was open to that � thought, ar� a�:_ed ii t}1�t wasn't adequately covered in the present ordinance. Mr. Boardma.� sai.d that no accessory building could be used as home occupation, but there �:•�re so:�e around. i•1r. Harris said tnat some t�e do�m tne line I-ir. � Si.nigaglio ma,y desire to sell his home or get out of the classic car storage business, �:�d he ttiould line to r�a'.�ce it clear to everyone involved �;hat the accessory �aild�-�g could not be used as a cabinet shop, body T'0U11:' snop, etc. � He stated he fe�t it would not nurt to state it as a stipulation in the recorrunendation so everyone involved would be clear on the matter. Mr. Bergman t�i•y`�]DED the 2•�OTIOi•1 to include limiting the accessory building use to exclude home cccupation. Seeonded by Lambert. Chairperson F-?arr�s ;,�ndered ii it k*ould be necessary to include in the m�tion something a�out the �arage being comput,ible with the e3;isting structare. I�•r. Bergrnan said thGt ti:e peitioner had stated it would be, and tr.at discussion �rould be in the :�inu:.es iar reading by Council. Air. Harris said the problem was that when t:.ey goti do::n tne lire at a later period, so,netimes the discussion parts were omitted �:�d the only thing that can be found is ihe motion �rith the stipulatior.s. :'r. �ergrn�n asked if there wasn't some type of incentive provided to tne ol•rner Lo :�ake �he aesthetic treatment consistent at the time he applied for �iie building perriit. He said that re�ardless of !anat the Commission said, t:�e '�uildsng permit process �•ras where it really happened. Mr. BoardmUn said that was usually a stipulation on the building permit. UPON A VOTCE VOT�, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairperson }iarrzs declared a recess at 8:30 P.P�I. and reconvened the meeting at 8:55 P.j�l. RECETVE i:Ei:O FRC`�� r`AYOR NE� TO TIiE APP�AIS COILiI�1ISSI0ivT: DAT� JULX 15, 1976 ri0TI0N by L�.ngenield, seconded by Ber�;man, that the Planning Commission recei<<e the memo from i•f��or I�ee � to the Appeals Coznmission dated July 15, 1�i76. Mr. Boa�dmatl said tiiat studies show tliat only about 25� of families can afford housing the way it is now. He stated thai: there would be some point in time when these �0' lots �au�ald have to be usedand t.he present standards would have 6S tr-'.•,9 • Pl�+nnin�; Commi ,sion 1d�Ptin� - Au��i�st 1�, 197b ra�;� a . 6 T to be dr.ol�F�ed or ehany��d so that �cof�le woulci Uc aLle to afford housinq. He saic� thai: right now about 75� of the familics were rcal�y strugglinq in buying houses which they really can't afford because they can't find a nceded home in a lower price range. Mr. Ber�man said he recalled the 1�0' lot considcration which was brought to the Planning Com:nission'� attention fr•om the Board of �ppeals based on a pending variance request. The Plannin; Corrunission, he said, then scnt tne question to the subco-�r�issions to c;or.e bac'r, to the Planninh Commission �rit!� regard to policy. Mr. Ber�man said that Coin.muni_ty Dev��lop:eent iaas one of those that revie;��ed whether or not !t0' lot� si�ould be considered•developable lots for housing, and they communicated back to the Planninp, Co;nmission, as did a coup].e other Com�nissions, and the Ylannir�g Cor1^�ission then pulled together or endorsed a policy-t.ype sit•uation in tnat : egard. Iie asked if it ;�as the P12,nning Consnission dialogue that Bill Nee was referencing in his letter, or if it was something else. Mrs. Schnabel answered that it wasn't really clear, but she thought it was the Appeals Co;nriission minutes of June 15th that pro�pted the ietter. She stated she would.like to review for everybod_y's oenefit ::�i:at has happened in order to help clear the matter up a bit. S;7e said that on rsbruary 10, 1976, the �ppeais Commission r-eceived a rec�aest for variance from a ltir. Denis L. Villella to construct a residential d�:elling on a 1t0' lot. At that tiMe t'r.e Appeals Commission decided that since this was the first reauest to bu;ld on a!t0' lot, they should pernaps request the Pl��:nning �omr.iission 2nd other subcorrcnissio.ls to try, ±.o develop some t;rpe of polic,y state:nent reg�rding 1;•�' lots. She said the worr�s "policy staiementt' c�me aboa�; because in revie::�ina t::e Ac�ministrative Staff Re�.�ort to the App°a1s Commission on that rea,vest, the rer�arks said s�metning about city policy statement. She com�ented that the +erm got to be used a bit loo�l.y, but it got to be used. N�rs. Schnabel continued that on P�:arch 9, 1976, �ne Cor-ununit,y Developrnent Commission revie:aed ic0' 1ots, on ,�Iarch llth it ti�as reviewed hy Iiuman Resources and on I�iarch 23rd by the �T'ld�ey Lnviron.�enial �'�uality Cor��►ission. She stated that on April 7th the Plannin? Commission received the minuies irom the three subcommissions and on Apr�l 21�h the J�ppeals Com�iss�on received the guidelines from the City Council. The Cit.y Ccuncil received �;hose guidel�nes prior to April 27th frori the Planning Commission. 3�irs. Schnabei explained that once �the Appeals Co12�nission received those guidelines on np?'il '27tZ fr'or1 the City Council., they rer,ioved tl�e request from I�ir. Deni.s Villella from the table. Mr. Bergman asked from i�rhat body the Appea.ls Co:nmiss�on received those guidelines, and I�Irs. Schnabel answered from the Cit,y Coi:ncil. Sne expl.ained that tne three subcomnii.ssions came to the Plannir.g Commission zrith their recortmendations, and the Planning Cammission develeped tentative guid�lines which were sent to the Cxty Council for their a�proval. Sho stated that the Council :ield tlao discussions on that, as she recalled. S�ie believed one was during their informal meeting and the second was at a regular Council mecting, and t-hey Gent their recommendations, whicll were not exact?y in a finalized form but in a sense the approved tentative guidelines of the Plannin� Commission� back to the Appeals Com.,^�ission. Mrs. Schnabel stated that on April 27th the�Appeals Commission acted on the request to buil.d on a l�0' lot. DIr. ViZlella had :na�e sax requests for variances, and the Appeals Commission approved �'our of the six' and denied two, and pa: sed � :� � � Pltannin� Co;nmis;:iot� ?,eetin� - Au�;ust 1�� 1976 Pt�e 9 their recor�.:endations on to the Ci.�,y Council. She' �aid a.t� that time triey had asked ifr. Ville?la if he would consider applyin�; for a lot split and gainin� five additional feet from the adjaceni; nei�hbor,.who also owned the I�0' lot. Mr. Villella iiad not purcnased the �lot yet but had made a purchase agreement. On riaf 3rd, ',rs. Schr.abel continued, th� City Council heard the request from Mr. Villella k�ith the recommendations from the .Appeals Commission, and passed on a 3- 2 vote approval to build or, a.lj5s 1ot. Sne said that Council's motion stated he r��st �archase five additional feet from the adjacent neighbor, so what thPy appro-�ed was uuilding on a�t�' lot--not a I�0' lo�.. She e:cplained that the adjacent lo� tisas two 1�0� lots, or 80�. Mrs. Schnabel informed the Commission that the petitiener had not come in and requested a lot split to date� and the house Was not under c�nstruction. 2�Irs. Schnabel said t?�at because the Council �rote was close and because they had made auite a i e�r chr..nges in their recor^mendations as opposed to 1•rhat the Appeals Cor�vnissi.on nad �cne, the Appeals Commission felt that perhaps they needed additional info�ation and maybe they were actin� under false premises. She said the �Appea.ls Corr ��ission didn't understand �ir.y Council overturned everything they had done, so t,hey �i:en reauested a transcript of i.hat�May 3rd Council meeting. 2��s. Scnnabel explained that it had been ir�possible for the City to get it off the tape, and it had been about a fifty minute discussion. All the Appeals Co�.�:issien received was one short paragraph s•rhich said "considerable discussion ensued" , the vote :�ras 3-2 a�d tnis�recomrlendation was made. She s�;ated that then the Appeal.s 'ommission asked if they could listen to the tape 'recording oi the City Council meeting instead, hoping they could find out mcre inform?tion beca�:se it had ce:,�e to their att,enticn �hat there _ was more informa�tion �rovided to the City Council that the Appeals Go�-�mission did not have. On June 15th tn�y rAid listen to that Council taps and held aadi.tional discussion at tha� time. Tren on July 15ti�, �,rs. Schr�abel said, they rec:,�ived tne r�emo from I�Iayor Nee concerning �he remarlcs the Appeals Commission made at ihe time they listened to the �;ape on ��une ��th. She added that a� their July 27th meetin�, the Appeals Cor,unission : isc�ssed his letter in detail and agreed to respond bac'_�c to I•iayor I�Tee with a ie�ter fro:� -the lippeals ComMission.. As iar as she could pinpoin�, she stateds there have been t'�irt.een separate discussions on I�0' lots start�ng at the Appeals Cor�mission and including the Corununity DevelopirL2nt Commission, Human Resources, r.nviroruneni;al (�,rality, Planning Commission, the I:ayor, etc. Mrs. La�nber� stnted it had been mentioned that i�ir. Villella made several requests for variances and the Appeals Corunission approved four of the six. She asked if he had s±x .fo�ty-ioot lots. I��rs. Schnabel replied no, on one 1.�0' lot he had s� vasiances he requested; reduction in lot size, reduction in lot width, maximum lot covera�e increase, side yard reduction, setback reduction, and additional side yard reduction. She stated that two of ttie requests were because the Ioi;�,Tas small, but the other four were because of the size and type of house he was building. Tirs. La�nbert said that rir. Boardman had mentioned that only about 2�I of tod�y's wa�e earners could afford a home, and questioned if the size of a lot would really make that muc;i difference in the cost af a}�iome. Si�e wondered what the difference in cost would be Uetween a 110' lot and one i;hat was 75', and su��ested it mi�ht be about p3s0�0 -$1�,000. Chairperson :iart�is said he would �uess a 1t0' lot would be about $�,000 -��,000, with all the ui:�.lities. He said there was 6U w �►u�;u:� L 1;, 1 y l more involved here tha.n ,j��st ] and areris, :and whcn �he,y were talkin�; lot costs they were talking raw land plus utility a��cssrneni.� and �trcet a:::�essrneni;s, and man,y tirac; thc >treet and uti�_ity a:-ses�ments rrcr�'in excess of th� raw land costs. F�e stat�d this h:�npene� quite fre�izentl,y., 'Mr. F,er�man sai.d it wasn�t common in lower-priced development�areas. Mr. Boar�dman said one thing about that was all the utility a�d street a�sessments r�ere b,y front foot� and Mr. Harris said that was correct� so therefore tt�ere was a considerable amount of difference. Mrs. Laribert said that in tryinp to provi.de homes fbr an average home o�mer, did tne size oi' the lot make that r-�ucn difference ciollar-wise or the 1;ype of structure? Chairperson Harris said there ��rere a lat of thin�s that entered into the total cost of a hor�e on a loi. Mrs. Lambert asked how much did land enter into it. Mr. Langenf'eld suggested they use about �y30 a square foot. 1•Zr. Ber�;man asked if it kToulcin't be fair to say that land and assessments were normally 15 - 20; of the total, and Mr. }�arris said that was reasonable, tf,rs. La�rbert said that in order to proJide homes for p�ople ;•rho rnay not be able to afford them, would a�t0' lat be that much af a benefit? She askedi if they �:ould be able to afford a home because they had a!�0' lot. rir. Board.�an said he thou�ht there were other things that were invol.ved, and asked the Cornmission to note r:ayor P1ee's statement at the bottom of the first page, ti�nictl said "I wanL to undersc�re that there rr�ay be reasonable ways of' developing the Lt0 foot parcel as a building site, but I have not seen such a pr.oposal yet. It i•rould certainly have to have so:�e very fundamental planning •work done on it... ". P�ir. Boardrnaxi said the problem ti�rith t�G' lots right now was that they wanted to put standard size houses on them, ar�d ma,ybe that was not the way to go on it. He sug�ested +..hat the standards that are set up under code for housin�, such as square footage requirementsg should be dropped so that de��elopnent of these lots could make it more affordaole and s;nalier houses could be built on them.. Mr. Bergman asked 2�Srs. Sc'nnabel if sl�e could read to �;he Planning Commission the guidelines tliat ��rere passed to City Council and apparently anproved by th�m. Mrs. Schnabel said sne 1•�ould first like to say that ��rher. the reauest for vari�ice carne be�'ore the Appeals Co�ission :.n rebrtiary, it i•ras the hope of the A.ppea�s Commission that perhaps �here would be more definite guicielines sucn as reducing the size of house necessary on a!�0' lo�,. At that time, she stated, they were •into approvi.ng �he wllole housing plan ior the City and getting into loi:-inco:�e housin�. She continued that the Appeals Commission felt this was an opporLUnity to find some method of �roviding low-income houses by utilizing 1�0' lots wit'r�in the city. Airs. Schnabel read tlle followin� excerpt from the minutes oi the April 27, 1976 Appeals Commission meeting: "Cnairwoman Wahlberg stated that in addition to the minutes of the subcommissions on the !t0 faot lots kThich iaere distributed at the last Appeals meetin�;, there is now available a list of tentative guidelines from the Plaiin:.n� Coi:riission on suUstandard lots. She explained that the Plan.nin� Commission tiad passed these guidelines on to t}ie City Council for their review, aild at �;his point the Council had not yet come up w�ith an affirmative plan. A;r. Holden said that 1;his was discussed at the City Council meeting last night, and they concluded the Plannin� Comru.ssion guidelines we-re.�ood pints to consider. � ' sv �� Commi ::�inn t•1�:��:!.in�; _ Aut;��;ct �� 1`I( 1'tt�;e Hc ndded that the Counci.l :;u��;est�d they shoul�� be consi.c3erei on :�.n i.ndividual basis� with review �and final approval to be �y ttie Council. Chairwoman Ylahlberg sai.d that �]_]. the :;ubcom.aittee� fel.t the city ��,ou1d �;o alo:.g with bui7�din� on 1�0� lots, btit there were stinulations they felt should be r�:::ere�: to. TENTATIVE GUIDELIJyT�5 FR01d THE PLANNING C0;�1i�iISSI0T1 011 SU:::�TAI�DARD LOTS: 1. The Plannine. Coranission feels th��t i.t rras consisten� with the Comprehensive Nousin�; Plan that suo-standa:d lot� s��uld be developed in Fridle,y, bui, each sub-stanciarci lot shculd be con- siclered separatc.],y. 2. That there be no vari�nce a7_].ot�red from the ;�resent ordinance allowirig a maxir�um oi' 2�;v lot covera�;e. (�or ezam;�ie, on a 5200 sr,uare foot loi, which ti;ould require a variy�ce ior lot size, only 1,300 squ2xe feet of the lot could be cov°red by the house and garage.) 3. If there is land available on either side of a sub-s�andard lot, every effort should be made to purcha:e that lot at : fair market price by the petitioner, so the lot size wou?: be consistent wi�;h the existing buildinb sites in the area. If the petitioner refuses to try and negotiate for additional ��acant ljnd, consideration should be given to denying the variance. Al1 denials have to be based on good, sound considerations. �';:'=That the owner/builder make as much of an effort as �ossible to meei; the existing codes. 5. That the house bein� built on a sub-standard lot ble:�d in as aestl�etically as possible wif:h the er.istirg houses v*: the neighborhood, realizing that a. �eza home caruiot a.li,,ays blend into a.� old neighbor':�ood. STAFF' S COr�•iEIdT5 : a. S1;atement of hardship must include statemen� regardir.b length of ownership tlhich t�rould gi�*e indication i� propert�� i�ras o�med for a numUer of years, or recently acquixed ti�;ith the intention of . speculating on developnent o�' a 1t0 foot lo�. b. All variances associated with the development of 40 �oot lots would require final approval by the City Council." � Mrs. Schnabel stated the rirzyor pos�d two valid ni•obZems in his mer�o. One t.•as, in spite af i;he Cor�preliensive Housing Plan� does the Cit�- hati�e an obli�;ation to the e�isting home owners in Fridley who perhaps moved to t.he suburbs with the idea o.f acquirin� additional s�ace icr themselves. She said to then start I, bui].din€; on �0' lots s�ot;ld per}:aps iiot fit in with the ��neral size of lots that tlie majority of the rnsidents of Fridley now have. She said she thought that � was a valid point which had not been considered before. TSrs. Schna'�el .said his second point w�s� how �do ,you foree a person to buy additional laz�d from the �djacent property o�,mer if it is available? She stated � �I� 6 �J � � Pl.unnin�; Convnis�ioti l4c:etin�; - Au�;u� l, 1.t, 19"rG P�Ge 22 � � 6X � , � � that in hi.� memo the Ma,yor went throu�;h that quite thoroutr,hly. She said that additional inf'ormation had corne to their attention since the memo which showed pretty mucti where 1�t0' 1.ot;s exisied in the City, and evidently there were few !10' lot� which were clustcred to�ethcr,�or in strips. Mr. Ber�;man said that surprised him, because when they reviewed Lt0' lots in Comrnunity Development, they were given a location of every !�0' lot and every 50' lot, He stated t}-�at all the addresses were listed and they even had sections of tt��e city plan :howing location�s, and they concluded there �:ere a lot of adjacent sr�all si•�e lots. TJaw, he continued, it comes out ther� aren't. Mr. Bergrnan said they had concluded that in most cases there was adjacent property that a 110' lot owner could buy and expand his lot. r9rs. Schnabel said she would like to correct him on that, and noted that , according to the listi.ng of 1t0� loi;s thai; she had, there were five exi_sting strips. She stated that three of them were two �t0' lots together, and two of thom were three !�0' lots together. She added that there were a number of otner � lots which varied in size from 1�7' do�•m to 25' and an,y number in between, not adjacent to 1;0' lots, ti•�hich tirere individual, landlocked, interior lots. She said that�as far as 1t0' lots in si;rips, there were very few of them in the City; � there were many more that were interior lots or corner lots where there was no additional property available. �� Mr. Bergman stated he thought it w�.s a key point that what ;:rs. Schnabel was describing as strips were very, very limited strips of 1�0' lots, and tnere were justtwo or three cases where this kind of thing could be possible. He said that this �as an entireJ.y diifere*it cor.clu.sion than trey had :°ached in Com�unity Development. I�-ir. Bergman said the conclusion they reached was that in most cases where there was a 1�0' lot, there was an opportuni.ty io exp2nd tnat lot. He said he wasn't necessarily limiting onportunity to atiother adjacen� !�0' lot;, but there tVas some prcperty such that a co;nbination could be made. Ne added that he would have tio review the d��.ta and the dialogue they had. i�1r. Board.�an said he didn't think they had been looking speciiically a't !:0' lots at the time, but were also looking at 25' lots and th�t type of thing. �ie s�id that in most cases the smaller lots did have adjacent property. Mrs. Schnabel said she thought part of the problem was that ai; the tir�e these ��equesis came to the subcommissions as ;�ell as �the Planniri, Cornnission, a lot of this information was not available. r1r. Ber�man interjected tnat he did have the data--a listing of the lots with their di��ensions. ,irs. Schnabel shoi.ed him the listing SIlE thought he had which shot,�ithe number of �0' lots and also went dot.�n to 25' lots. Mr. Bergman said he didn�t think tney had that data. Mrs. Schnabel said there was another memo dated April 30i;i� on substandard lots f'rom Dick Sobeich, and a list of substandard lots under �0' with no adjoining vacant propert,y and a].1 zoned residential. She stated that these lots ranged in size irom 25' to !12' , and there �,Tere 2!t of them. Pir. Bergman said he was confused right now as to wliat data they had had in Comnunity Development. Chairperson }�arra.s asked t•ir. Board:nan what percentage of the substandard lots made up i;he availaUle buildirig �ites that remained in � ridle��. r,r. �3oardr�an replied he couldn't give a percentage fi�;ure, but thcre were prohably about 150 lots 1eft. rir. Ei�rris said that �ccordin� to their survey, they were 85H built on R-1. rir. Boardman pointed out t}iat was back in a�out 1972, and they had been doing a lot of buildine. ;•ir. }iarris st�ted he 1,hoii�tit they were missin� Y�- -� ■ a couple of poi_nts. He stated tl�r�t the � that werc remainin�; in Fri.dle�, and one uo to the fRCt th3t t}'1P_ rn;ly thin7 left rezonin€; would be substandard lots, He I ■ fact. � � �J ' � probl�m w�s thr ava.ilable bui.ldin�; �ites of these da,ys they wcre �;oin�; to wake to bu�1d on as far as R-1 without �ome said they should start facing up to that Chairperson Harris said the I•:ayor also brought up the point of taxation, and asked how t}iese lots were t�ced. 1•ir. Boardman said the,-� were probably taxed as buildable sites. 1•ir. Narris said if that was the case, he had a feelin� t�iey were leE;a.11y in tr�uble. ile stated he had bee.n after the City Attorne,y�s �°fice �;o �et a memo ou� on Y,:�erc: ;,he �ity si,00d legally on I�0' lots, and after all these discussions he had yet to see such a merno. He want.ed to know if they could legally deny a building permit on a 1t0' lot, and said that �ras really the crux of tae w�ole situation. l-u. Harris stated that if the City was. ta.�:ing ther� as buildable sit,es, then he thouE �t they were mora)_ly obli ;ated,. if not le�ally obligated, �o malce some provision to build on them. He added that if th�y s�rere not �oing to a11ow constrac�icn, they should be obligated to chan€;e �he taxing strt:cture on them; not only as far as general taxes went b�st as far as special assessments also. i-ie said that if they were.going to be turning them into gardens or someti-iing else, pnr:�aps ti:ey should be taxed as aoricultural.. ;-?e said he would li!:e the City Attorney to tell him wnat kind of ground they were on. . Chairperson Harris said tzat a number of those 1�0' lots tiaere tax delinquent, ' and a lot More would go tnat way �i they made a decision that under no circum- s'tances would build:�ng be all.�wed on them. He said tliat tr_�n t};ey would be sitting rri�� substandard lots which would turn into neighborhood ji.ink-collection � grour.d, or the adjucent property o��-ners k=ould use them. I�ir. Boardr�an pointed � out that the problem ;•:as tne City �.�ould have to �aintain the weeds. He said that under the normal �reed prograri that would be char�ed off Lo the otaner of � tt7e nroperty, but wit:1 tza:-forfeit property it was just assessed against the property. � Chairperson Harris said he thought they had to look at the alternatives. He stated t.hat a11 the tnings that ha�.�e been said are very true, but behooved them to s�;art put�;in;, a plan �cgether. :•,r. Boardma.n said he thought tne l�;ayor's state�:ent was va.l.id wnen i7e talked aboui what was meant �.inder Corimunity Goals � bv "qualitti� of life". �;r. Boarcl.ri�n said I�Iayor I�ee had stated that a 1;0' parcel under the present code tiras not a buildable parcel, a.nd he ter.ded to agree wii;h him. �� rir. Hasris said he disa�reed �,ith the Mayor's one statement ti,�here he said that t!�ese were the nei�hborhoods i.hat had the worst histor,y of urban decay. He said he wished to take issue on that, and t�.*anted to say that he k*as born and raiseri in I�orth�ast tiinneapolis and moved to 5outh T;inneapolis and grew up there. He stated they had never lived on anything lar�;er than a 110� lot and he didn't consider the nei�hborhoocb to be in a state of decay. Mr. iiarris stated he would like the J•ia��or to go to Northeast 2�Sinneapolis �id tell the residents that their neighborhood was in a state of deca�v. Air. Ber�man sai.-i that he would like to make t�•ro comments: 1) He said he would like to su,�,�;est thaL the reason the Couiicil vote of 3=2 iaas so close i� .rir. Vil].ella's i•equest was because }ie did a mar�;inal job i.n applying effort to the stipulations. 2) He said he would like to poini; out the Communii:y Development 6Y r,.. �.. Plannin�; Commission Mec;tin�; - Au�ust 1�� 197G Page 15 • :: rr.ight bc handlin�; 3>� lot:, ar,d 2�' lot�. He said he wa� ju�t tryin� to simplif;� this thin� b,y in�king that statement, bu� thou�;ht the,y had to draw the line someHhere. Mr. Lan�;enfeld asked wha1: could stop an owner of a 1t0' lot f'rom asking for a Special Use P�rmit. Mr. Boardman ariswered that there was no condition for a 3pecial Use permit on this. He explained that a Special Use procudure was set up for a special use on a property, and a livin� uni�t was not a special use on a R-1 property. I�s. Lan�enfeld corunented that he certainly felt that this Comrnission's co:�ments were really the r�.ght route to follow. CnairF.�rson fiarris asked r�hat �he attitud� of the ncighboring cor.ununities :•:ere on !�0' lots, such as Col.uribia Heights, Hilltop, and New ]3riEhton. P4r. Boardman replied that he didn't think Colum�ia fieights was havir�g that much of a problen, and so:�e o� the newer communities weren't experiencing that problem because there were plent;;� of buildable sites arounci. 3ie said he would i��a�ine t"�at Colurr,bia Hei�hts had reduced their sauare footage requirements un�er the UBC, and there was quite a bit of difference bettaeen square foota�e requirements. Chairperson Harris said that maybe it should behoove them to make this a project, and 2�Ir. Bergman corrunented that they nad one related project �oing on in CDC. ne said the' question before tne Community Development Cor�u�iission tiaas speciiically wnether or not a garage should be a requiremen� on substandard lots. He said they would be acidressing the question of a garage being required on a!t0' 1ot at the next meeting. He added that the discussion'held at a previous meeting seemed to slant toward the need to specify a garage regardless of the size lot ='or aesthetic reasons. . 2�ir. Harris said tha�; perhaps this should go bac!: through the committee process to be considered again. He stated he had thougnt they had look.ed at it at one time, but �uggested they loolc at it from a different st�n�point such as d.ifferent house desigr. or smaller houses more compatible ,�rith the lot size. He said he had the feeling they had to staxt someplace and they had better start doing sometning. i�ir. Harris stated he iaoulri find it very disagreeable if the court k*ould decide this issue before they had an o�pori�unity to plan it out s� it would :sork. � rir. Z�ngenfeld ask�d if handling this on an individua.l basis ��ouldn't do the job since there weren't that many. Air. H�rris said perhaps t,hat iaas true, but perhaps what tney s'�ould be ].00ki.n� at is smaller, more cor►patible structures for !�0' lots. Mr. Boardman said then what they �aere looking at is possibly a separate code section tahich said that on substandard lots or on lots under a certain square foota�e t.he minimum building area on a house should be reduced. Mr. Langenield conunenied that he didn't ieel the Environmental Quality Corr„-�ission could actually say how large the house should be or if a garage should be required or something like that as they wer•e not qualified to specifiy a form of construction. ASr. Boardman said the�T did have one square footage size li.mitation, and that �aas the UBC. He said .the UF3C stated that no house shall be smaller tlian tliis. Mr. Boardman said that what Mr. Sobeich was talkin� about �a�s that maybe they should come back and take a look at the substandard houses and ask thcroselves �:hat t:ie,y �.�anted to rec�uire on t}lese lots. He saic� they would still �•:ant to maintain a ria�cir:um 25`� 1ot covera�e, but should take a lc�ok at the minimum square foota�e requirement for housing units. }ie su��est�d that maybe on those sub- �__ —I'I��nlnt; �;r��:,�i��t� :.u� Lln�; - Au�;u:; l� j� - Ya�;e 16 I� standard lot: �L�e�• �ho�11d �;o duwn to the UL'C n��nimum. iie corJnented t:,at Lhey ,� �rauldn't have to sa;� anytning on thc desi�;n of the thin�, but sa;� that a gara�e was not a requircment on substandard loLs and tnat' way the option would be open to the oti�rner. . rirs. Schna�el pointed out that in the letter she wrote in response to 1•Sayor Nee's memo, she rnade a suggestion that the persons involved in these orif;inal discussions (t'r:e Planning Corr^�ission, subcommi:;sions, Councii and appropriate Staff) sho;:ld �et to�et.i��r and have some type of opeti discussion wnere the�� could get so��e of t':ese ideas out a.nd 1'ro:n there pxoceed to start to ceve�op a new policy re�a:d�^g buildir�; on I10' lots. ��e stated she �hou�ht the ::ayc:'s remarks �;ere well-t�:cen and she felt he carie up wit!� so:ne ve=^y good nEw ideas, and she thou�;nt t:ie point brought out at this meetin� concerr.ing taxa.iion on these !�0' lots was �. good poir,t that hadn't been full�� discussed yet. 1�rs. Schnabel co::,:,�r.�ed ;,:�at t:e problen �ras all of tnem nad not gotten together to talk this out at one point to come up �rith sorne ideas to start to develop codes that would be tiei•tir.ent to !t0' lots. tlith regard to garages, for instance, she a�ded, atia�hed ba� aoes �,.�ere only required on ramblers, split-levels and lot-splits, bkt �ere not required on ather types of houses (s;:cn as a t��o-sto:f house). She s�atec that there z�,ere sor;e situation5 on subst?.ndard lois �.:^ere the existin; co�e h as so unclear that they were not sure g�rages were required at a]..1 due to tne �tiording in�the code book. hir. Bergma,n saiG this �aas the suoject they ��ould be a:dressin� at their next Meeting in Comrnunity Development, and Ntr. Boardma� su��es �ed tnat rather than just suostandard lots tne,y tai:e a look at garage requ�re:::� :is o�: a11 lots. Chairperson Harris sa; d ihat ma,vbe c�hat they. snould do at t;:is pai.nt :.n time, since there seemed to be a com-�unication �difficulty wit'� Co�^ci? , is rea�aest a t:;.me slot w� th the,:� on tha � fou: th ;:onda;� to sit doti•� at a j�rcr:�cshop meeting and discuss this to see if they couldn't get some sense of c�.rec;,ion or policy. �•Lrs. Sc'tuiabel said that i�ras precisely whai she had reaues;,ed of t:�e 2•iayor i.n r�er letter. rfrs. Schna�el said that �alking about codes and tyr�es of dwellings, there k as a problem in t�:e existzn�, code book hh�.ch could be relevant to building on 1t0' lots. She stai�d Lhere z•:as a description of a single-�a-nilv dwelling uni� of split-level des=gn, and tnen there 1�ras a description of a two-story di�:elling unit of a splii-e:7t:�� design. She said she did not know what the difierence was betF;een thc�� t:•.o, 2r:d the�� had different minimum square iootaces. ��Ir. Harris said ti�e: e was a difference bet�een a split-level and a split-ent�•. He explained ti�ati a spli�-entr,y was where you walked in oii t�e street and there �ras a stair��a�- �oin� to t'�e downstairs and one �oing to the upper level. i?e said a sp1i�-le��el �as wi-:ere there was no stair�aa,y at the entry and t�e rooms on three or fou: levels rere =� st•ory apart in hei�ht, and that sometir�es a split-level would hati-e half a basement. rir. Boardman cited the example where the garage saas some �imes belok• the bedrooms. . � :i Mr. Bergman asl:ed if it kould be a true statement that in the City of Minneapolis �-�ere there are a lot of homes built on 1t0' lots, that th�y are nor,;.all�• greater thnn 2�i� coveraLe. t:r. Harris said he didn't think so, but it was possible. rirs. Schnabel iiiierj� cted that they didn't have those faets :ind fi �ures available. Mr. Eer�man asked what kas implemented in the 27;�, tind I•Ir. Boardman replied building st.uct.ures and accessory buildines. P•1r. Ber�man said sor;e of the homes must come pretty close to exceedin� the 25;� coverage. He stated t}iere wasn�t much of a back 3•3rd �id there was typically a garage� in it from an alley, and '_ I, ' . r,..�. _ � � Ylunnin�; Commission Meetiri�; - Au�;u:.� lt� ly(b YtI�C 1( very littZe ::ide yard. 6 CC Mrs. Sctinabel said that l+lex Barna on the Appeals Commission had brou�ht in books oS house desi�;ns which could fit on laU' lots witr�out any variances reyuired. She said that perhaps the desi�ns were more modern than the City of Ninneapolis was �'amiliar wit}i since t}�ose hor�es built on !�0' lots in 1•Iinneapolis 'were basic- ally older homes, but there kere some very ima�inative kinds of consti•uction that could be put on !�0' lots. Sne added th3t ihe�price mi�ht be another sub,ject as they didn't know what it would c�st to build some of these riew and different type hornes that �:ould fit on Ij0' ].o�,s w9.th no vari�nces. Sne suE;gested that ma;�be the price would be prohibitive to �qualify for lo.r-cost housin�; ar?d that it mi�;nt have to be a higher-priced hor�e. Afrs. Schnabel said the point was there were houses that would fit on !�0' lo�s withoui; any variances at a)_1. She added that some of the questions tnat had to be resolved k-erei Do �re want to save the !�0' lots for low-income �ousing? Do we want those Li0' lots to be buili with any type of dwellir�g? Do tae want to reduce the requirements for size of structure? She added that there were many problems associated with buildinb on a 40' lot which she felt hadn't been fully cove:ed to this point, and tnat was why she wanted to get into this discussion again. ' Chairperson Harris said he didn't feel they were �oing to accomplish a lot by discussing this any fkrther, and called the question on the motion to receive the Aiayor's memo. � UPC?N A VOICE 'VOTE, all votin�; aye, the motion carried un animously. MOTIOIV vy Langenfeld, seconded by Lambert, that the Planning Co:�imission be ' allowed to attend the next informal City Cc�uncil meeting to reaol.ve the problems concerni.ng 40' Lots. Mrs. Lambert �aid she wondered if tha� might not be a good time to ask the City Attorney abot�t the legality of tnis, and I�!r. Langenfeld said he thou�ht this would be taken care of within that discussion. Nir. Boardman said he would make a point of having that information available at that meeting. UPOI� A VOICE VOTE, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. s RECEIVE TIF?�i0 FRO.�f VI?�GINIA SCH,; �BEL� CHAII?;:'Oi�i.4N OF TI�E APPEALS CCi•'.�IISSION, „--- TO A�IAYOR I�; `�;:, L'�� 1 �ll � u LY 3�, 197 � , MO`PION by Langenfeld, seconded by Bergman, to receive the memo from Tirs. Schnabel to Alayor Nee dated J�aly 30, 1976. r1rs. Schnabel said she would like to point out the memo sllould.read from Virginia Schnabel, not Virginia FlahlUerg. She stated that the,y did truly appreciate receivin� th� memo from Aiayor Nee because they felt many of the points that he raised were good, valid points. She said she thought it was pertinent that this carne up ��t this time before the,y received ;u�other request to build or� a !t0' lot. rirs. Sctinabel conunented that the Appe�ls Commission concurred witti t}ie Mayor that tttey did not like the hit r�nd miss ,proposition of �;ranting variances on Lt0' lots w'ithout anythiti� more than the �uidelines that had been �st�blished. She said they i'elt i;here would probably be other problems that would arise which hAd not been looked into; and some of these had been"raised by ti�yor Nee and the f,,._.,,,� .. � Planninp Commission Meetin� - Au�;ust �, 1y76 PaC� �� ' ' I ' , � � � � Ylannin€; Comrnissivn at this meetir,g. She st;ated th�y were hopeful they cauld get somc new dialo�ue starte�l. Mr. Langenfeld asked if Chairperson Harris thought �hey mi.ght have to have some kind of consolidation of al.l the previous rnateria7. �rior to the meetin�; with Council, and 1�Ir. Harris said he didn't think that h�as necessar,y. He_sug�;ested everyone just come in and put their cards on the table and leave it inf'ormal. N�rs. Schnabel sai.d t}ie Appeals Coruniss�ion would appreciate �etting all ti�e various thou�hts out in the open anci finding out as much information as they could. rir. Berrman told I�irs. Schnabcl that he �;ot the impression that �he was looYing for something that she probably wasn't going to get. He stated that Appeals had a problein, and they could not escape the indivi:dual reauest burden and there wouldn't be any panacea. He said the Co;nmunit�r Develop:nent Coru�ission suhmii;tec± a license for denial, wnich somehot•r bot turned into a license for approval and the context turned over from wha�, they had intended. Nirs. Schnabel said I�tr. Eergman rras correct that the Appeals Commission had a problem, but they dii not have any type of vehicle which wnicn to solve the problern other than to come back to the Flanning Commission and Cit,y Council. She said they had used th� guidelines vrh•ich had 'oeen sent to them as the basis for approving and denying the variances, but they felt the problem was larger than hJhat i�t appeared to be and felt scme of the po�nts the N:ayor raised (i.e., tne effect on the exisi;in� residents of Fridley) were ��ell-taken and had not come up before. Tnat, she said, is why the3r felt i+� snould all be reviet•red again. • Chairperson Harris said that hopefully something Vrould come out of i;ne �oint ' meet,ing and they itiTould get a concensus of direcLion. `�irs. Lambert askeci who would be the participants of the joint meeting, a.nd i•tr. Harris :eplied the Planning C�mrnission and an;�one else who wished to come. Airs. Scnnabel � stated that in her r;emo to P�IatiTor P�ee sne included me:�ibers of Com:�.unity Devel•^p- ment, 'rIi:man Resources, �nviron:nental �uality, :-.�peals Conu-�iission rrd Planninb Commission as wel.l as City Councli memUei°s and nppropriate Staff persons. 5}.e said that it may be a large body, but it was the ,�ia,yor's prerogative to make � that decision, and he r�ay subsLitute {;he Planning Co�r�mission's motion over 'her sug�estion to hiM. 1 AIr. Lan�enfeld said that it was his intention ti,rhen he made� the motion that i;he meeiing would include the Planning Con�;�iission, but be an�nforJ7a1 meeting open to the entire puUli.c. P�irs. Scnnabel said that the Appeals Com;nission felt tnere � may be rnembers of the other subcor�.rnissions who nad some ideas or ttioughts that they ��ranted to relai;e. to the rest of theM, and they might ha��e some ver,y valid thougllts. i�ir. Boardman explained that as far as the motion went, the Planning Commission requested to be on the agencla as a Plannin�; Commission. � However, he said, as Chairpei•sons tliey could invite their Co��u7issioners to attend as participants because it would be an open meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all vo�;ing a,ye, the motion to receive t!ie memo from A9rs. Schnabel to riayor Nee dated July 30, 19'l6 c�rried unanimously. ' C � �� ' ; ; � t ; Plrinning Corr.m�.ssion Mcetiri� - Augu :t 1a, ly'l6 �'"�� '' COi�TINU`:�: i-:UA`AN D1��VEI.OP2-1EidT GOkT,S AIID OBJE�TIVES Mr. Boardman stated he had nothing to discuss an this and would like it continued. Mr. Lan�enfeld asked Mr. Boardman if he couldn'i: incorporate somewne�e unde: Program Objective D1lt0 something a'�out the handicapped. Ifr. Boardman replied they were gcing to do that., and as�ed ii' he meant the Pro�ram °lar. and not necess2rily the Fro�ram Objectives. 1;r. Langeni'el.d said he was getting the irr�pi•ession that this was gettir�g preity much set and pernaps the handicappe� had been omit;ted. Mr. �SOardman replied that under D1L�0 "�courage the adv�7ce- ment of rec:eation opportunities ior all residents", they kould have sometr.ing on activities for the handicapped. He explained th�t t!�e Program Plans were not set and �rere pretty open, but �ri:at they were establisning now were the Goals a�d O�jectives. � 1�;OTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Schnabel, that the Planning Commission continue the i:urr:an Development Goals and Objectives until the next scheduled meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. �� REVIE`r�•' P�r�CS a REC�EATSO� r'.C�•`?�'"1SSIOi� i�iIPdUTE�: JULX_ f�TH A:�D JL`'LY 1zTH, 1976 > .,�_._._..._. I�fOTIO?y by L��;enfeld, seconded by Bergmany that the Plannin� Co:nmission table the Parks and Recreation minutes of July bth �nci �iuly 12f�:�, and also �he minutes of t.he July 26th meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carrieci unanimously. Mr. Baardman brought to the Commission�s attention the Beer Ordinance as revised by the City Attorney. iie explained he had jus�t reccived it today and brou �t it before the Plannin�, Cem-�ission for their review. MOTION by L�ngenfeld, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission ' receive the revised Beer Ordinance. Upon a voice vote, all voting �ye, the motion carried unanimously. � ADJOURA'�iENT : � MO'PION by L�ngenfeld, Upon a voice vote, all Corimission neeting of ' �i,� seconded by Ber�man, that th� meeting be adjourned. voting �ye, Clzairperson Harris declai•ed the Planning August !�, 197d adjourned at 10:35 t�y unanimous vote. Respectfully submitted, �.� � � � � , , .. (' � ,-�, � , . ., �, ..� ' ' � � Sherri 0'Donnell Recording Secretary 6 EF T"...`° -- � �r�E n' 0 � � �• ( � �"� . �' l . ._�� _ ., , �b�'o- : nN�75 . A i�G�n-- � . �h� 3 �---- iy��5�--_'. � �v.�l. �'t� ��,H� _� '� "�� :`:: :,---�-=-�— �� 3� ' , � . w� N4�� ' �c��7 �`2v � � . ►�'Gir � � , }�G03 � �_�OD �, � �- .,,. ,., �..� i'6; ; .� r--�--r--� `r----- % 49 i�4-¢. SP #76-11 � � . _. ..7 , b�� t� , �g�3 . �� l� 1`@ . � �1?� �� ; `u�yq ,��bz--- ��Nl �� r � u7., H S ��' 3 � .�,�-�� %i- -1 i � � �_.�._...�.� N�_° ( ��3� - . H ��.� _! �.�Zb � ;_ : � ,�; o,� � � ��z�. ::'.�+ �---� �._.._�,.-.�-^- � i�� `J j+��II�.. �� f,. �- .-----, . . t-� � JOSEPH SINIGI�GLI �� .^ 6 FF :; c��S.4gY U I , ' . , � ., .�'�:> �.„ ,� � {� r i r /n � . �� 7��0 � :i �t •� / -i i - `1 'i L� I ' �� ....;_" �'f td _ y�� ¢ z� � � g6 3 . . �: _ . . .� !, - , c ' i '�d � �r -°--' --;i ` `s ( H � �, . � � �� .-� � y ; +". ��1 -� + yt `� �`) ' � d � �.i.., ,"3 �' �- , ��3� A � �g3� 4 �' .. � �y`� 3 ,., �} r. � � C� , . I yi�?� , N�2? �; �, �� - cc„— �'a� ' � v �) ,; :. '��'�% � }��i� _. ..,�. ,C_.. 7 ��ao ..� id . .. , — �7 _ ��a3 r ,�003 - -`--�-�, .. .� .6. L. , . �_ ; % <, � : � ..� ' . ,�..�.a: . :1 f ,t ___ . �4�V E. w Li_ �: ,J l --- � ,/:C.sr' � � /1r :�C � _ izf DCn 1 . .�. . . __ _ .. �� / r ; �� a � � � ,� •;. ? � _ �« �; z> �I . . tia�7 , - ---f - � � - -`� -- - f ��3 z3 .� -r'� . --2-- � �� -= ------�=� �� ; i{ Z,. � ,�� z: s , f=�7��. _ - . - ,- \'��^ N�� _1_ ' � �,� _ � ,�H��K �� --- � 1,;1 � � > d < .''' 8 � ' �?---.i.� , -N�32 ; : �i i?9-�� j; --9�; , ---?' �i I f_ ;, �;E� �- � ,< <-z±... z:� 1 � �, y , - Z � _. _ _ �... -- �, VI l ,,- ,; ;- � , 2D Li%�� - �s -- -� j� i1 a ,I � ��.�.1� _ ._�9... ��r5 .: C:::' ,o N7IU � ._. ___ _.� .4 � i � ir� � ' /7 -,H7�0 �. -N7�3 : -,� �� : � i�:. i � � � � �� ' --- _?<,r_; • :__, �_. �1�� '... ' o � _.. f��{�'SS '�o �+s,`;o� . �., i�; ' � Z j,�6��7 '� � uc;� �`i.�. "° `; - J�� r " �i=FCj�I �. �'�i20, /i . : � � � �. :: . -- 2 - '-o� � _.---.--- = � �� ^ �j � + ------ �' `{� 7 - -----t�-� '" � ic�� ,__..�., ��, 3 - -� '`--;- '� � ` ! �.�t�3 � ----s - 1 -� , --- — . 6 � � � o ��;�51 �. ---�- ,- ° �� <<.�z� � � ,�, � c��3 ��; ----•-� ` S % � �1 L� G 3 9 _ . 9. � :' �. � � ��i 1 - --: :� - ^ �;.,,.� � �' . , Y1517 , N � h,�,rv }��C� ;;l)0 ��bp� :; ;; N ,. , . ---.-----� i—` , . � r ;�� _' �� ; � �r� ,�;x� . � .... ��. ' � � ��-- •, .. -- � � � �;., - �� , �� , . • . �.�.,�: _. P� . F. �., , E . .--1 ': , I. _..; _ , .�i'� � :.! � � ��_ i f � ��, , �- � 309 State Capitol Bldg. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Phone: 296-4179 David D. Schaaf STATE SENATOR �� Augus� 12, ].976 Fridley City Council 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Niinnesota Dear Gouncil memberss 6550 East River Rd. Fridley; Minnesota 55432 Res: 560-8893 Bus: 57 7 -4600 � The Schaaf Volunteer Committee requests to be placed on the agenda of the Fridley City Council meeting of Azz�ust 16, 1976. � The Committee will request that the City Council �aaive enforcement of the or�.in;ance that limits the size of political signs until the 1 Committee has had the apportunity to e.ih.aust ,- its avenues for appeal �Chrough the Board of .'�ppeals. � Senator Schaaf �,�i11 appear on behalf of the Committee. Thank yotl for your consideration. Sincerely, � �.0 `� Robert ;.eel: � Campaign r;ana�er Prepared and Paid tor by iho Scheaf VoluMeer Commitlee, Oavid Newma�, Treasurer, 6279 llniversity Ave�ue, N.E.. Fridley. Minnesata 55432 � 0 T0: FR0��1: CITY OF FRIDLEY ME MO RAP� D UM f�ASI��I f�I. QURESHI , CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL MARUIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY P1GR.JFIN. DIR. SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF AMERICA�'V LEGION LIQUOR LICENSE FROM 1315 RICE CREEK ORAD TO THE FRONTIER CLUB, 7365 CENTRAL AVENUE DATE: AUGUST 12, 1976 Mr. Henry Peterson of the Ameri can Legion Post has asked that he be gi ven an opportuni ty to speak to the Ci ty Counci 1 regarding the transfer of the ameri can Legi on Liquor Li cense from thei r present location to the Frontier Club, 7365 Central Avenue. , Section 606.07, paragraph four, of the City Code siates that all licenses granted under this ordinance shall be issued for the premises designated in the application._ Such license shall not be transferred to another p]ace without approval of the 1 i censi ng authori ty. Apparently, the license can be transferred by the City Council v�ithout req.uiring an additional hearing on the license. Presumably, the license is issued primarily to the organization ratner than to the location. Whether the building they plan to move into is suitable f rom a zoning and code � standpoint is another question. The Inspection Department will have to make an analysis of this after they have secured a copy of the plans, etc. from the Ame rican Legion Club. � .MCB:sh Attachment � � 606. INTOXICATING LIQUdRS — CONGRESSIONALLY CNARiERED VETERANS ORGANIZATIONS 606.01. Delinitions The foltowing definitions shall apply in the interpretation and application Of this chapter and the following words and terms, wherever they occur in this chapter, are defined as follows: 1. The term "Congressionally Chartered Veterans Organizations" shall mean those organizations which qualify br iicense under the terms of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340. (Ref. 405) 2. The term "on sale" means the sale of liquor by the glass for consumption on the�premises only. 606.02. License Required No person or organization shall sell, deal in, or dispase of by gift, sale. or Otherwise, any liquor without tirst having obtained a license to do so tr��m the City Council ; provided, however, that this section shall not prohibit the g�ving cr serving thereof to guest� in a anvale home, snatl not prohibii the sale thereof by a manufacturer or distributor to a person helding a license thereunder, and shall in no way effect the operation of the municipat liquor stores. . 606.03. Kind of License Issued "On sale licenses only" may be issued to Congressionally Chartered Veterans OrganizaYions which have been in existence for ten (10) years prior to the application for such license. Such organizations shall be issued for the sate of on sale liquors to members of the organization only. 606.04. Applications • All applications for licenses hereunder shall be rnade to the City setting forth all information necessary to show whether or not the app!icant quali(ies for such a license under this chapter, together with such additional informatior as may be required by the City Council. 606.05. Fees and Bond The annual license fee and expiration date shall be as provided in Chapter 11 of this Code. All applications shall � also be accompanied by a liability insurance policy which shall be in the amount of $50,000.00 coverage for one person and S100,000.00 coverage for more ihan one person and shall sp�cifically provide for the payment by the insurance company on behalf of the insured of all sums the insured shall becorrTe obfigated to pay by reason of � liability imposed upon it by law ior injury or damage to persons other than employees, inc�uding the liability imposed u:�on the insured by h'��esota Slatutes Section 340.95. Such lia�ility insurance policy shall contain such other a�d additional prov�sions as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 340.12. � ' i � ' 60&.06. Applications Investigated The City Council shall cause an investigation to be made ot all facts set forth in the appticaiion. Opportunity shall be gi�en to any per�•on to be heard for or against the granting of any license. After such investigation of the application, a license may be granted or refused at the discretion of the City Council. 606.07. Conditions All I�cense;; grantad hereunder shall be issued subject to the f�llowing conditions, and alI other condit+ons o/ th�s ch2pta r and s��bject to aU other provisions of this Coc:e applicable thereto: t. The license shatl be posted at all times In a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. 2. Np sale af any I�quor v: ill be made to any person under guarclianship nor to any person under 1II years of age. 3. No gan�bliny nor any gamtaling device prohibited by law shall be permitted in any licensed premises. � sos.0� Detinitions License Required Kind oi License Issued Applications Fees and Bond Applications Investigated Conditions 'I' 606-1 , �All licenses granted under this ordinance shall be issued for the premises des�gn�ted in the a�pliration uch licersc� shall not be transferred to another place without approval of the licensing authonty. 5. No license shall be granted within six hundred (600) feet of any public school cior within six hundred (600) feet �f any churCh. 6. The licensed premises shall be open to inspection by any police or health ofiicer or other properly desig�ated �iticer or employee ot the City at any time during which the club shall be open to its members for business. 7. The sate oi intoxicating liquor under such license is restricted to members of the club which holds the cense. . The licensee shall strictly observe all of the laws relative to the "on sale" of intoxicating liquor as set forth in the Minnesota Statutes, together with all the rule� and regualtions of the State Liquor Control Commission nsofar as they are applicable. � 9. The liability insurance policy as required by this ordinance shalt be in full force and effect during the term of �ny license granted +�ereunder. 606.08. Prohibited Sales o licensee shall sell or serve liquor to any intoxicated person or persons or permit any intoxicated person or persons to remain upon the premises occupied by the holder of such license.. �O6.G9. Conduct Prohibited No person•or persons shall conduct himself or themselves in a disorderly or boisterous mann�� upon the prsmises of a licerrs�� holding an "on sale" license, nor shall such ►icensee permit or suffer such conduct upon such licensed p►emises. �606.10. Revocation In addition the provisions for revocation in chapter 11 of this Code, any license granted hereunder may be 'revoked by the City Council for cause. Cause for rsvocation sha11 be v�olation by the licensee or its employees of any law of the State of Minnesota relating to intoxicating liquor or violation by the licensee or its employees of any provision or condition of this chapter. A license shall be deemed revoked upon the passage of the City �Council of a resolution to that eftect, and no portion of the license fee paid shall be returned upon revocation. 606.11. Penalties Any violation of this chapter is a misdemeanor and is subject to all penalties provided for such violations under , the provisions of Chapter 901 of this Code. ' , � � ' 806-11 Prohibited Sales Conduci Prohibited Revocation Penatties 606-2 • � • � , � , , I GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY Cer�ijied Pr�blrc Accoun►ants i75 SOUTH�PLAZA BUILDING WAYZATA BOULEVARD AT HIGHWAY f00 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTq 55418 548-2586 The City Council City o� Fridley Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Dear Council Members: August 6, 1976 ' We are currently planning our fall and winter work program and would appreciate an indication that we may be invited to conduct the 1976 audit of the City as we have in past years. We would perform an audit of the balance sheets of the various funds of the City as of Uecember 31, 1976 and the related financial statements for the year then ended. The audit would be performed in accordance with the procedures established by the State Auditor and the Americari Institute of Certified Public Accountants. These procedures are compatible with the pronouncements of the National Council on Governmental Accounting. The audit which we will perform will be an examination which consists of a review of internal control, accounting procedures, and the details of all records, in- cluding subsidiary records and supporting data as to mathematical accuracy, propriety and completeness of all transactions on a test basis. The test examination presumes that the items selected are representative of all the transactions. Although such an audit is the one most frequently used today, it will not neces- sarily discover fraud or defalcation. However, should fraud or defalcation exist, it may be uncovered as the result of one or more of th� procedures applied on a 'test bas is . As in previous years, we plan to do as much work before the year end as possible so that we may present our report at an early date. We have enjoyed our relationship with the City during the past years and hope that we may be allowed to conduct the 1976 audit. JGM: �nd Accepted by the City of Fridley Very truly yours, .- � � G" J. Gregory M rphy, Partner By: Title Date ' E — -0�1�[l.L ll�� {I{L' I�1��11i1,C Lir`� GiVI\ ' CI�fY Jr F(tllil.�Y , I'�.��iJ�`�1 Ff�'1 T�� FI'�/� �CC�� '�� , TO:� DATE: ' �. � Ci ty tlanager and Ci ty Counci 1 August 6, 1976 Rev�nue Bonds For Industrial Spray Painting 0 1� Mcr�o r�o. �� `' � RESPO«D QY: � COtJT. T0: � '�Je ha�v,e had �n inquiry fl•on Industrial Spray Painting regat�ding the possioility of the , City authorizing the issuance of industrial revenue bonds. t+lr. Ernie Toews and Mr. L ' ToeHrs exal ained that they ��ould li ke to pu'rchase thei r exi.sting 6ui lding. Ti�ey also would l�ke to ra�se enougfi �oney so tnat t��ey could refurbisn the inside of tiie building `� as well as doing some landscape work, �vork on tne parking lot, and on the exterior of the buildir�g. The total-amount of the bond issue they are interested in is�approximately ' $35�,O�O.J�. ' , � ' ' ' I exolained to them there is a definite proc°dure whicf� should be followed for tne issuance of industrial revenue bonds and gave tner, a set of the guidelines tnat we nave developed. I ar� bringing this to your att�ntion at t�is point so that you may �ive so�� orelimir�ary indication as to whether or not you feel t��e project may nave merit. They are not asking for any kind of a conmitr�ent a� this tii�e. iiowever, if there is a possibility you would be interested, ��ey ��+ould then proceed wit�� step 1 of t�e guide- lines for selling industrial reve;�ue bonds. MCQ/dc 0 �� r�ay � 4, 1975 CITY QF FkIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTP�IENT' GUIUEI.IPJES FOR SELLING INDUSTRIP,L REVEP�UE dONDS STEP I: l0 A A company �nterested in issuing industrial revenue bonds should develop sufficient preliminary cost estimates so that they car� �:alk Nri�t� � bond underwri�er regar�ing the extent of financing needed. The campany should contact the Ci�;y Administratior� advlsing them �hey plan to see�; f�nancing through the use of industrial revenue bonds. S7EP �I: ihe company selects ar, underw��er ta har�dlE thc hond s�le and he1p prepare the information for the bond iss�e. STEP III: � The undervrr� ��er reques�s cc��r�l e ��.• i n�or��uti c:n cor�cc��rr i ng i:he compan,y, Y ncl udi ng financial, histc�rical; prc!�uctior� data, and �r� ir�come stater:>nt i°or tl��e nerrr plar��.. In dddi�i��!'�, engineErir�g and archite4t��ra1 r�Fports cor�cerr�ing the propased facility may be rey�E�ir-ed by tf�e urid�rri�riter, ard can��:r��t-ion r.omillitmen�:s ser.ured. STEP IV: ' The amount af �he bonc; i ssue � s estir,�ate� �s iri tf��c fal l owing examp1 e: Construction , Land . : � Legal, prir��ng, iea�e a.n� irder�ti�re exp��is�s Escro�.,r Fun� ' Discount� - � . _.i, Lease insurance prein�um Interim financi ng and contingencies �. Total Eond Issue $�OU,��G 1U0,000 .� � S o�U 12,500 2.5 fOGO S � 460G 8,000 �-- � $500,U00 (A) Consists of approving attorneys' fees and vario�s adminis�ration fees. ' {B) Interest escrowed tivhile facilities are under construction. (C) Underwri�Cing fee. The trustee receives �363,000 to pay construction and other project costs. , I'�, � , S�EP V: Tne �r��r�•rric�r prepares a cou►piete feasioi i�iiy report witn respzct to ine arnount of - t1�2 issue, dates and amounts of principal pay�nents, rede��ption provisions, convenants, and other detiils necessary for the issuance of markptable bonds. The recommendations are based on the preliminary inforiTiation furnished by the company. GUIQELIPJES FOR SELLING INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONUS (COT�TINUED) lO B � ' �_� STEP VI: The company deposi�s �5,000 with tPie City whzch wi11 be used to defray front-end City expenses, if any, in connection with the �ond issue. Any amount not required for City expenses will be returned to the company. The actual City expenses will be deducted from the $5,000 rrhether or not the bonds are issued. The fact that a $5,000 deposit is made does not guarantee that�the:City�,Council will authorize�:. issuance. af•;�the;�:industrial_:,�r��enue bonds.�in. c;uestion� ' The underwriter and/or the company submits }�r�liminary plar,s to the City Council. The Council has its fiscal and legal consultants review the plan. The Council ives reli ' ' g p minary approval or disapproval after the fiscal and 1ega1 advisors report back to the Council. . STEP VII: If the Council gives preliminary approval to the plan, the underwriter carries �:he project to the Commissioner of the Departnent of Ecoromic Development providing all th2 necessary information on construction and fir�ancing of the project:, ��hich may include among others, the following: a. b. c. d. e. f. h. i. J• Breakdown o� projects costs; . Method of provision for-:construction;. Date, amount and metf�od of bond sales � Lease terms and�rent�l payments; Duties, obligations, and responsibilities of the municipality and the lessee; Bond amortizatior� schedule; Employme�t of trustee �f trustee is to be employed; Mortgage arrang�m2nts; Lease options; � Covenants with bondholders. STEP VIII: Obtain a lett�r of intent to purchas� bond issue from an' under��riter, or analysis from a fiscal consultant that the projeci: is feasible from a financial standpoint. STEP IX: � File application for approval with the Com�nissioner of the Department of Economic Development. � STEP X: Prepare and execute final agreements, leases, and trust indenture, if applicable, and issue and sell municipal industriai development bonds. STEP XI: � The undert��riter haviny� ueter,nined tne project Teas�ible �su�iniis a firrn �ic1 wiih ine exact coupons to be set at a later date. The bid is accepted by both t�tunicipality and Company. . ' 7he bank is selected as trustee, coupons are set, and bond printing is ordered. ,! � � ( 0 10 C STFP XII: . During t'r,e next three weeks the bonds are sold, and a trust indenture and lease agr�ement are prepared. . STEP XIII: � � . . t•lhen all proceedings are complete, a payment daie�is set. At closing, th� legal opinion is issued, and funds are released to the trustee for payment of costs of the project. � . . STEP XIV: The underwriter requires various reports from the co�pany for the duration of the � bond issue. Th2 Department of Economic Development requires anr�ua1 pragress reports from the company and the municipality, (see attache� form letter frorn the Department of Economic Deve7opment). � � , FIRE S�RVICE CONTRACT BETW�EN CITY OF FRIDL�Y AIdD CI7'Y OF IiILLTOP ANOY.A COUNTY STATE OF:.MINNESOTA This agreement- is made this lst day of January 1977, by and between the City of'Fridley, party of the first part, and the Cit3 of Hilltop, party of the second part. Whereas, the first party has f ire f ighting equipment suitable for use in the protection of property against loss of fire; and the second party has no �adequate f ire f ighting equipment of its own, and d'esires ta obtain the use of equipment of the first party, and services of its firemen, (�Jhen possible for first party to furnish the same), within the territorial limits of the second party, namely the limits of the City of H�lltop, Anoka County, Minnesota. Now, in consideration of the promises, herein made, the m,utual covenants thereof, and in accordance with the terms anc� conditions hereinafter mentioned, the � parties hereto agree as follows: 1. That upon a request made by or from the City of Hilltop, the first party, will give and render assistance if figtitin� any iire therein and will send such equipment and men as are available, ready and able to be sent by the f irst party. 2. That the consideration tu be paid by�the seco�d party and accepted by the ' f irst party for the furnishing of such equipment and men to f ight any fire or fires, is as follows: ' a) A flat fee of nine thousand and no/100 ($9,000.00) per year, shall be paid by the party of the second part to the party of the first part, to satisfy the contract flat fee requitrement. I� � b) An additional sum for each call trip, of one hundred and fifty and no/100 dollars ($IS0.00) will be paid by the party of the second part to the party of the first part, and one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per hour or fraction thereo£ for all time beyond two hours; � 11 � � � FIR� SI:�tVICE CON'J'RACT ' , � ' ' �'afie 2 11 A said time to commence when the equipment a�d men leave the fire hall of tlie party of the first part, and shall end wl�en said equipmene and men are back in said fire hall. c) The party of the first part will inspect industrial property, and commercial property and multiple dwellings at least once annually and will render a report to the party of the second part. The party of the second part shall pay the party of the first part three hundred dollars ($300.O�J) annua]_ly for inspection services. The party of the second part shall be responsible for enforcins fire prevention measures. d) Pay�nents of the fees under the terms of the contract shall be due and payable Uy the party if the second part to the party of tlie first part as follows: (1) Annual flat fee ($9,00.00) shall be paid by the party of the second part ta the party of the first part, in two installments, $4,500.00 due and payable on January lst, and $4,500.00 due and payable on July lst of the current contract year. 1 (2) Fire call fees shall be due and payable by the party of the second part to the part� of the first part on the month following the month in which the call occurred. (3) The inspection fee of $300.00 shall be due and payable by the party of the first part on July 3'1st of the contract year. 3. The operation of the equipment and the direction of its use at the scene of the fire, together with its ner:, shall be in and under the complete charge of the Fire Chief of the first party, (if he is present, otherwise his next in command or agent). The question or fact in each instance as to whether or not the fire equipment and personnel of the party of the f irst part are ready and able to respor.d to a call in the City of Hilltop shall be determined by the Fire Chief or his neat in command or agent. 4. The party of the first party shall act in good faith in sending its. equipment and men, to any such fir.e as herein provided; and no liability •• shali attach to the.f irst par.ty b}� reason of any negligent act or commission of the driver or any men sent with said equipment to said f ire. It is partic- ularly understood that the first party is not obligated to send said equipr.ient and men upon call, if in judgement of the Fire Chief. of the First party, or his next in cor�mand or agent, said equipment and men are required at the time within the limits of the first party, to fight any fires then existing. Should road or weather conditions be unfavorable, in the judgement of the Fire Chief of the f irst party , as to the furnishing of said equipment and nen at the time, then the f irst party is not obligated to respond to said call: and should a f ire start within the corporate limits of the first party during the time such equipment and men are traveling to said fire, or while they are actually engaged in fighting said fire, or while they are standing by, said equipment and men may be recalled or sent back to the City of the first party, provided in the judgement of the Fire Chief or his next in �ommand or agent of the first party, such action is necessary and advisable. ' F]:RE SI:RVICL COPdTItl.CT P��e 3 1.1 3 , 5. The party of. the second part shall be responsible £or obraining any back , up fire services to respond to fire call for th� party of. the second part when equipment of: the party of the fi.rst part: is unable to respond under conditions outlines in this contxact. � 6. This agreement with any exhibits and riders attached hereto, contains the . entire agr.eement of the parties and no representat�ons, �nducer.ients, promi.ses of other agreements, oral of otherwise, not embodied herein, shall � be of any force of effect. 7. This agreement is in effect upon execution by both parties; and shall remain in effect for a term of twelve months from th� date above £irst shown, except that the said contract shall renew itself for an additional period of twelve '.months unless one of the parties has given a ninety (90) days �sritten notice � of intent to terminate prior to the end of the twelve �onth period. IN WITI�ESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this lease to be executed and aff ixed their seals (if any) as of the day and year f irst above written. C��Y OF FP.IDLEY Witnesses to City of Fridley: Witnesses to City of Hilltop: �:AYG�R (Seal) CITY PiANAGER CITY OF HILLTQP: MAYOR (Seal) CITY CLERIC n � i M ,1 MEMO T0: Richard N. Sobiech, Public Works Director '' MEMO FROM: Thomas A. Colbert, Assistant City Engineer V 1e " �, ' DATE: August 13th, 1976 SUBJECT: EASEMENT ENCROACHP�IENT REQUEST - 7348 & 7358 ' � SYMPHONY A request has been received from the above property owners to allow an � encroachment of 1' each onto a common 12' drainage and utility easement ' located adjacent to Lot 11 & 12,Block 5, Melody Manor. Correspondence has been received from all existing and potential public service utili- ' ties indicating no objections and research has indicated that there is ' presently,n� city utilities located in this easement. After an on site inspection, it is the engineering division's recommenda- ' tion to allow the existing and requested 1' garag� encroachment, as the � remaining 10' vaould be sufficient to handle any potential drainage pro- blems. ' � � • , � i 1 12 . ._ �� o �--.� ' _______- -�- �� g,;� ��- ��----� IZ /� __ ._ ._ __----- .__ .��-�� - . , I`_`' - - �h� ��'✓o,; . ,�os�er/ Gne o�'Sfa�e Tu�,k N�qhwoy N'S6, �% ,; o,_;o.F , y ,�3�.4�' � �� ! O'SD'F v 95 , � � s /� � ' � . ,�p 9C � eo � .j��Jn, � , 9G 90. �� z w �'�,c `5 90 i � . '� � � � b� , . . � � � ;v : W N � 1 ; y � rJ N N N v `� 0, ,�� '� w N o N N N .a W . N 1' � � * �ti O � � � � � , ; i � � t � y� � , o � �% I I . __ - _ ' I --- i � 1 � � � 1 � ; V � � �' � -.9o.a�-- -95.Q/---' ' -95---� v; ,� �--90.0l--- -/87 '- - �30 W � � ; �o,ZD•.z�"E. __91.26�_ --�z�4- � �--_7559"-- ------5.0=03=3��E. '.' .._.--- - ' S�9�.25-' _-a�.63"� ,�.�. � �' ` ; --- ' � 8�.a�-- ----.go ---- '_s2.�i �" � � � � ' a l, ;' �' � O ? S° c So� E 84 S' ' ,� ad �� 0 °° ��t'4\ \ � � v � � � ��, � � `� � � V v r ' .,i :at' = 48 �s'jo.. � �i }� � t' �� v .� V w �v ti4' •''i� S - N V ' �� f� � i, � O � v o� ! �' c4 ��, o � � N; � iu � lp � l� V �°� 1 St 4� O, ?• r' j' i I �' ° "`� `'' �` � n 1' � o 00 '`� � � � •,. °°- w ;;. ` � � � p � .; `' , � � �o? ys- - � �" � � w � �`' L-- -_ , O o � ;e•o'Si'u" Zi=i'o3' je=:'e?� . � °'�. s � �` f873d=42.„,-� -/ � - W'?; 63.9G %8 �2 %�' %ZS9 z %1�73 � /'pz'S'.. i � �N' e; �y �`1tiy � /r J�l' �j �'a Z � ��. 2: p/4B. a 72 1 le. i CE' �3' `,` � _'h T 'l�� i�`� V ��a i - -- d_;I.y,C�.. � � � i' a 1 'l1 .. ' �� g!� Q � "'�� c � q� 5;��' tD : � �o R'?o!9. u � � � �l � � _ � � J+`' 9 i � -fy'.3 �. 1 � , p� '1a;7 GZOB 78.43 77.¢ \� � d �,o �- �7S-s� ' ! rn �/ � �=e=e'S! SG�� =d:I'o¢=i�.. 7d.I`o3::s. t��S6 �' 72_'qb `14a:eZ.. q � I: ° '��,,- i �, V- , � 2J,�'07-id„ � 82.5', ��"- ��•{ �°� f� 8,�' sc.. � 1e:' �p�:39. %7¢f . )� � � �9. `_ S� �j ' Ta_��e3:�5... i' 825�/ `�� P. ��. O, N O �N O � O � \ � I, z�`�-G7-�d` 80 � � ?/�d� % , � � � `� � 1 � S . t ; � O � � \ =L..�'O,j:sT. B? � . � � �5. o'if'az'�r. � , e � \ : s:: _o � ; .. :o' --6.324-- --73.95--� �-72.97-- _ r i � � p � Ze_B?S. -7�B¢--� i --,----- --8j.o5'-= --78.37-- `��8¢--- � r°-24:s�. � p �0�.' � se 0"54'S6' --82.SS--- _�83 '72,97__� L 7�•• d ♦`: 7_ _ 7" S_ p�; � 1'�t. - � �8 N � ' 4=/3jL, °1; �8.39 _ _ - � �^8 o ; � o .,, � � ;;�`� -d3 6, ,_ '. -9 - � � � � ' � � ` 0 o C4 U � o' � \ 8�6`�7Bf`` _�,. � � . N _ ;�,;i:c�sa'_�' '�78.Sj9 ze�/.nd��, ,�' o- � 4 � _783,'?BS� `/ , � _y ' '�'-u- � . o r S8. R9 j 73. 62 S� _�_,-, �. v ,P Q- 7? B:s p ,' a � � ..,,qq 1 4•.s53. %3�` z�`/rvd:o�.. , � ,` � v � ,0 7.iC/ Ze`ii,:�9, , D �I; ; �`''"_ iG'S.i �,.� 4 • /BC8 c � Y - z' � �z'.%f - � N ` ,. C�32 85.07 b,7 ?y a � �,(� a. zs.,� f .�'s-3 :,,. ,, ``` : �;a=�-ci.or qa i'zo:sz•• .a ,.,y' 8?.�9 '�... .sr.. ,'=o�.vrY 1 � ' , • S.:• � .3 ; o =e��.,8:ss. 6¢a3 �7 iJ 7'� � � •/ � �: �? p s� B/, y�� , a �. _ � ` ,,; s Sp � � � o � o � rv � _ e �" �*'c; 3 o � � .J , � � ` ie-.. • � � J � O 1 , ' � s,; .. y ..1 J; 4 ,:.t.�i . � �,i5o'ij,;, w 1A•/':n'S7. , V• \ �'i.s. .,. `° •'�'- -«p� - -- Z��-Z-_1 l . 7j,l. . U tJ -.� , f.. �Q r � _ - - ,;, q�,� � -1 , O ,V : e � a - •- - - - --- - - - _ � i'n i'o�,�;9 '--�',g -_ _. --?f',Sy_ i � � �1 •e�4• 7 - d1 ?6 -- - - _ � _ � � � R'=%.s.so - 'B,s p4 _ �- 7, �� `` � 1 � �. 1 ' ' � 7T � • V � � W v � -. � �''s _ _ - =- e.> �. � � � O � � O � �',= '�� `' �y�s,� � � �U � �? o \9 � ^ `` J / � � � � q' � 7� ';d �•o!',,- 7i..'t0=::' tA-��t:�S7 v �`;�� A:��Y'. 4tQ�\ S.� jj :�y�:9 733% 79,�. i�: •,s:��„ 0 \ r�. 7 � �-•` yd27 .�' ;-,s.�,_ �1 \ '',,y_`':'r�- ' ; - .• :s. ?5 lc :'a �-.. l'v _ ' . ��e.r. �,_+ I� � � CJ Q , - p�-l.c�'�-C� � � o � �� 12 B ��..� u��r.�-r�o� �� /��e- � oy-z� -c� ,� -72C'-��zz�C.Gi 7�'L G � .�c� "L� ��t-�-, �G Gt�G ,r•n-G � � _ ,� � � z- �j--� � �.1, : �� J .�a—�- /� , ; �.��-� � , �1��- . ��-�-.�� , C�n� -eh��u� c.c�-a�a.� -� ..c--�-rJ.,� r..E�`'Q'`'�-..:_.. � � ,,..ai ��,y-z,�- �- � ' ��-c.ch� ...� 2�'�-��-ZC� t�-� t � '4-c�c � r �-✓ / �1 � / �-r� �-�� a..e��z.-�/ � • ;!7?.e-., -e•-� GYL� ��.C/�G'-cz�a-e-r7zc��. ' � . • r //� y � �'L..C/ _�(:.��L� G :cf2�f..c�-`^--�� -� ' v � o-��-�-u.�/ -�.�� L7"�u-� �0 � �< , �--� , �� 3.�.� ��L 1 � J�---� �.�� r. � 1 ' ' � �� 1 ' ,��-� ��.�� _ ,� � y2%� � 2� � � �-�-G! � %� �� , , � r,2�r� ..�'/ � �. �=� ��-- � f/� �%��/ .✓ %Z.�. � 5�� ' 12 C 1 f � l� � � �:� Min�e�asco � Minnesota Gas Company , 733 marquette avenue, m:�neapc��s. m�roesota :�a02 � july 22, 1976 ' . ' , . � Mr Leslie Zimmer ' 7348 Symphony Street N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � Dear Mr Zimmer �� The Minnesota Gas Company has no facilities within that platted � utility easement over the north 6 feet of Lot 12, Block 5, Melody � Manor and does not object to any encroachment nor vacation thereof. � Sincerely yours ��,-�--= -: �� _ , r -� �� William R Schram � R�al Estate Section ' /,r cc: J H Anderson ' ' ' ' I , ,,,�.� 1.2 D ,�'P,°�-, � �a ,�� i � �� Northwestern Beli 6540 Shingle Creek Parkway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55430 July 22, 1976 • Mr. L. R. Zimmer 7348 Symphony Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr. Zimmer: The Northwestern Bell Telephone Company has no objection to the en- croachment of three (3) feet onto the six (6) foot utility easement paralleling your north property line. �� 9 �� ; �� -�:�� - Engineering Manager � . � "" � �" �' "' � ►1 � " �"�' � . .�.��..:::��.�: � , N O R 7 N t R N ST AT 8 S P O W E R C O M P A N Y A!{01 ddTH AVHNU� NORTW �ROOKLYN C6NTLR, MINNESOTA 664Qo Jufy 26, 1976 City of Fridley 6431 Unive�sity Ave N E F�idley, Mn 55421 Attn Mr Darre! Clork Dear F�tr C ( ark Garages have been built at 7358 and 7348 Symphony St N E which encroach on fhe utility easement along Lats 11 and 12, Block 5 of Me(ody Mc�nor. Northern States Power Company has no objection to the encroach- ment of the�e garages as constructed. Sincereiy �� W F Laidlaw Gene�al Manager North Division WFIf rp �2 E • w ' � �,>..;;-,F.,......,. ... .:;.. ...�..,..,.�.j e�:'• s r.,a:... r•,::�..+�,1 `a�....� i �;' _:r:�. • a�':j �Y I �:..�:. ..:�ta . . , � . • ' � l�sr ��e 4 �a�.� x�l � -� ..� 1� � ... .�a, a � . , r� ,_, �� p :l W 1. .,,_.�r ;�, �, �,. :�, � � 1� ! c �.: � .... � �, . �`� �:- i��/ 1:::�� t= r� f t;.� L� Y � �°�, ;�,�A�r� •r-,�-;n_�-.�-,�-� �•�,,�,,,,� �E� r��.�=. , ' _ . _ __ �___ - - F=ridley, Minnesot� 55432 (C�1��) '�=�BB-f�100 ' Fiu:;t�:�t 1�'y Z97� ' . ' .^..7.�y/ '`J� i �']f�j�� G4.':1 !Jn: v::r.si�� C,�.�e. td. E. , , ' Fricilc;,�p (in. 5�4�1 . : (lttn: f1r. Qarrel. Clark . , � . � �' • . DE.�r (�1r. CJ.ar.k: ' / � ' , - � ' . , t/ - Gara�es i�ave hec:n bui1�4 at 7°,58 ar7d 7343 Syr.�N��ony Si:: �': E. wl�ich en^ra�!ch on th^ utilit'y cas�:me;�t alnng Lots 11 and.12� I � _ i31o�l: 5 of ;�1�lod; � i�.nox. � � . � � � � � . G�neral ► e�.�V:t.S1G'l of F"ridlcy ha� no �b jectio� to �thu encra�ch— men� of i:hase c�a:.��geu "�c�ns�ri;c�ecl, S * �. • • -SincerelY�- �' , � �_ r // ' • `��ic�� C��I'v��'P�-' '''YG� . _ � . � Chuc{: I�un;��rf'ord " I' ' � GiU — G`�n�:?`�l i ��.�rl��r . } T * ' . , ` � • '. . 9 `' � I � . . � . , , . ' ,� � _ . � r i x � . sr" . . ' � .. . . � .. `,' M' � . .. . , . . . . ' � , ., _ . � � . ,. . . « . . ° � . � ;., , . '. ' * . ' � ' . ' ,' ' _ . � ,� ' . • • , � � , � . • s e 12 F �: ' � 1 ' • �� ' 13 ��' - f� i � l � i- ` �. ��. ` �� L: . � ,, _' '�.)L- � � u �, �C � _ �� , � . _ , t_. %��,' � _ � . , . C C � �' ,-� ' ( �'- j _ t 'r... � � ri_ . a` 7: �� %r/� ' �l )� ' j, , �) _ // l � l' �, _ � %/, i- � �, �1 ,'/i.. �, :�� / � L_ . -�) 1 , -� . / L �,:! / � .� , � c. �. ., i: � � � %' � . �. � t , � `` � . � 1! !�-l' .. _, i /� / . �/.� �. L ��,, � /: •C � �,� ! % � `i ) - / , , j... / i/ / � �- � � u C �: J L Cc ` / / : : C L� � _ � i C ,_ ; � G , � , �'' , � -y �� -�. GC `�_ ._ l: � i._ c� G _c' � L i'- .. � l, '> ./ / -- / � � . _ ,� �, � // / ' . -� � � ` , � i .. � j l -Z^ � L / '_% �. C. � � L: !- .-- G c � J . . . .. (. � � t �� l .� . /`_ � � / _. /�- � / / 1 � "l�-% (.l_� �� CL.. �_---L 1� ) l c /i l�" / �i.- % ( . „ �. r/1� Z . _ . /7i}" �_- � � �.� `� �� . -%% �/. �i �� ,.:.� 7 l '7, ��i� �� -1 .. �— r ��"i , � __ � � ��% 1 �- ,-�� , ��; ' �%�� - - , , . , �; � " � �_--r_. �, � — �-� �� ; ,/��C, 1� 6� . a.��.) /e_>�,` � 7--� . ` / , c. .. � - � � �" t , ! % // � , . / , � '-�,-. .��_Cc-.'Z �-� v .--� ! / �C'--t �, - _-t i ) L�_ s' � i{ L . —) % •/ - `--� ) � �l r— . � � ,% t_�. �7 L 1 � __ L�/ c�C _, c ,.' , � / � '� C bi-1 i. L F . �..: "c GC. ' --,i� i`. \ ��-. :� , �-�� . / } •� C�_..�� . � �/ � C� � L � . . � , . /� . � � . -'� .0 J � � C `� � `- �,,-, v .� / �� / � � ��..�G �' L( � L L�C c Ii��C J� � L�� l� '� � -'1 ; �- r�` ^ ? . ' `� %- , , _ , , / _ ,; , _ . // .. .t �. �, ..� -i. i � i � � . � � � �► � �� i � � � , � i i h � t � . � i � � � s F : ; 2 j 1 : f � t i l3A � .. �inne�a��o � Mil�nesot� Gas Company 733 marquette avenue, minneapolis, minnesota 55402 july 22 , 1976 Mr Thor Johannsen 7 358 Symphony Street N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr Johannsen The Minnesota Gas Company has no facilities within that platted utility easement over the south 6 feet of Lot 11, Block 5, Melody Manor and does not object to any encroachment nor vacation thereof. Sincerely yours �, ��%.�c''c.��- ��,,.,�— --� William R Schram Real Estate Section /jr cc: j H Anderson �� , 13B � r� �� `� ��.. � Northwestern Belf 6540 Shingle Creek Parkway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55430 July 22, 1976 Mr. Thorwald Johannsen 7358 Symphony Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr. Johannsen: The North�vestern Bell Telephone Company has no objection to the encroachment of three (3) feet onto the six (6) foot utility easement paralleling your south property.line. , � , � � ��:� �� d � /� " Engineer�ing Manager � �� . tdQRTHBR N STAT�S POWLr'R COMPANY 4601 6t3`�N AVHNUL NOFiTH DROOKLYt� C�NT�C1i. MINNlE6�TA ,6�410 A July 26, 1976 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave N E Fridley, Mn 5542� Attn Mr Dar�el Clark Dec�r AAr Clark GQrafle� have been f�uiit at 7358 ond 734� Symphnny St N E which er�croach on ths �tiiity easement alang L�P� 1� csnd 12, 131ock 5 of Melody Manor. Narthern States Power Company h�s no objection to the encroach- ment �of th�se garages as consfructed. 5incerely �� W F Laidinw Genero) Nhanager North Division WF LIrP 13 C .o T ` ,:.�ita� :: ' � ' . " . 7 1� I) , �,•...,... q r -...r, - -a .�� c �a r t.ar... ;;.�. v� s.,,�.�; . .^� f �-�.,a r , • .,� E,. .. r 2!'n"ri � n � .-a+►y �.�'�@is � , Aw.,-� "- _ . .. !1'� � ' i � � . i � ' { 9 l'1 � ' :`'.qk Y! e . ._ i .� � l'A jP �J i] �f �4%if�3 � ' � . . � �'- '� � � ,� � '� �� C�� (��=(=-� I U � � Y � � . � � � � � . : P�t;_�h�';�._ (;°1 N.F-. ' .., '_s`�-�n. C;"3r.�i /�.�,..,,� �� •- -- -�•-" hridley, Minnesota 5�4:�2 [6'12) 566-8�00 : � f��-��:�r, 10� 197E ' . � Ci.'�� ' � �, -�f rw_..��_�,y . � G•��.�1 Un�_v��r:.i�;� I',ve. i�!o C. . � � � ' Fz?cf�.�:;,� ['1no 55471 � . � Ai:tn: f�'�z. U�arrea_� C1ar1: � ' � .. � , � � � Dear Pir. Clar.l;: � ' ' � Garages have been Uui'.t it 7358 and 7,�4f3 S;��;��hcny St: tJ. E. u��?ch enr.roach on tl�c� u�ili�y e4semcnt alar,g Lct� 11 and 12� . � _ Qlocl; 5 of ficl.ody !`l��nor. - � G��n�:ral T��7.cva.�;5.0;7 nf Fr.�.ctl.:.�y ha:> r�o ab,jec�ion �o �t;h� �ncra.�ch— (� E:fi� 0 i �:ili:iS�i J�J1'.^.��G'3 ��S CGfIStrUC�?�I a � '� . � ' - "�C7_��C.Cin�..�;�� . . _ . . :�_ � �� . 1 . , .. �.. �:,.cv� � f ��;'�'� � —`r _ _ , ✓'-� � . • � � �- ' Chucl: Hun�;��ford - _ � , . ., rj U — Gei;eral Piar,a;er . . . ` * ,, ' ' , ' "; . . � ' • ' ,. , -� . , .. � � �t . . ; ..� .�. . ' :,, . : 1 _•,' . � . . . ' . _. . ... . . . . . 1 , � � . .. : . �: : � . , �, .� . _ , �. .' . . . � ' � � ! . . - • . . A . ', . .. � �.. . . . .. . . . r � . . .. � . , � . � ,� � ��. . � . �. ' ' . � . , - � . � • � � . . , . . � . � , . .� � , : . . . ._ , , ' . . � ' . .. , � . .� . � . . , - . . , . . .. . � . . . . . ' . . .. � � . - . . . . - . . ' • . . . . . . , • . . , ' . .. .. � _ . . � . � . . . ,. , , • , . . ' . - .. . , . . . � ' � . ��. . . � . . .. � CITY OF FRIDLEY BID NOTICE �or wARNING AND �.r.GULATARY TRAFFIC SIGNS, MARKERS, SIGN POST AND INST9LLATION HARDWARE EXHIBIT "A" The Cii;y Council of the City of Friclley, idinnesota �vill accept sealed bids on Street Traffic Signs, Markers, Sign Post and Installation Hardware on the 24tn day of August, 1976, until 11:30 a.m. on said date at the Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, iviinnesota 55432 (telephone 571-3450). All bids must lneet the mini►num requirements oi the specifications. F�.ilure to comply with this section can result in disqualification of the bid. Each bzd shall be accompanied by a Certified Check, Casnier's Check, Cash, or Bid Bond and made payable without conditions to the City of Fridley, l�7inr.esota, in an amount of r.ot less than five percent (50) of tl�e bid, whicn check, cash or bond sha.11 �a forfeited if bidde�r neglects or refuses to enter into contract, after his bid has been ac.cepted. The City reserves �the ribht to accept the bid which is determined � to be in the best interests of tiie City. Tne City reserves the right to reject any and all. bicis and waive any informalities or technical- ities in any bid received without explanation. � The City Counci� also xeserves the righi io consider such factors as time of delivery or �erformance, experience, responsibility of the bidder, past performar�ce of similar types of items or materials, ' availablity of products and other. similar factors that it may deter- mine to be in the best interest of the City. r , � Copies of the specifications and beneral conditions may be examined in the office of the purchasing agent, or copies may be obtained from his office. All bids must be submitted in sealed envelopes and plainly marked on the outside with STi�EET TRAFFIC SIGNS BID , Publish: Fridley Sun � , August 11, 197G August 18, 1976 Nasim Qureshi, City Manager 1�! , � ' RESOLUTION ��0. A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - WAR�lIN� ANU REGULATORY TRAFFIC STGNS, M/1RKERS, SIGPd POST AND INSTALL�ITION HARDWARE QE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, as follows: 1. Thai it is in the interest of the City to award bid contracts for the follo��ing items or materials: ALL TYPE STREET TRAFFIC SIGNS, MARKERS SIGPJ POST INSTALLATION H/�kDWARE 2. A copy of the specifications for the above described items and materials, together with a proposal for the method of purchase and t{�e payment tfiereof have been presented to the Ceuncil by the City Manager and the same are hereby approved and adopted as the plans ard specifications, and the method of acquisit�on and payment to be required b,y the City with respect to the acquisition of said items and materials. ,. 3. The purchase of said items and material� as described above � shall be effected by sealed bids to be received and opened �y the City of Fridley on the 24th day of August, 1975. The City Manager is directed and authorized to advertise for the purchase of said items and materials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by iaw and the Charter of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially in form as that sho�vn by Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the� o-Fficial newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AfdD ADOPTED BY Tf�E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS . DAY OF , 1976 ATTEST: CITY CLERK - MARVIN BRUNSELL MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE 1�; �1 [-� 1 CITY OF FRIDLEY t�EMQRAN DUM i � T0: NASIM M, URESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CI'TY COUNCIL Q r � ' ' � � FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR./FI'N. DIR. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPOINTII�;G ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE SEPTEM6ER 14, 1976 ' PRIt�IARY ELECTION DATE: AUGUST 12, 1976 The names�of election judges on the attached resol��tion have been taken from the lists sent to us by ihe Anoka County Auditor. These lisis were sent to the Anoka Coun ty Auditor by the twa political parties. The law requires that in a State-!��de election thQ lisis be sent to the County Auditor by the two political parties. The two political parties were asked tosupply at least six names and mare i f possi ble for each preci nct as there are alw,ays some on the 1 is ts who are not able to vrork. t�le placed an item ?n the City's f�ewsletter as�ing that anyone who may be interested in working as an electiGn judge to ca1T City Nall. � ide have used the two lists from the parties and have filled in with independents where we were short judges , or we have used people who have ►�►orked as juc�ges before. Apparently the two parties were unable to obtain � e extra names so we had to use judges who had worked in past elections, plus some of those who called City Hall wanting to serve as election judges. � MCB:sh � � � �' �S ' � � RESOLUTION N0. -1976 RESOLUTION DESIGPJATItJG POLLING PLACES AND APPOIf�TING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 14, 1976 PRIP1ARY ELECTIOtJ. NOW, TiiEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, t�innesota, at a regular meeting thereof on SECTION 1. That on the 14th day of September, there shall be an Election � for the purpose of voting on the following: ' SECTIOPd 2. That the polling places for said Election shall be as follows: � � ' r ' ' ' , ' • Ward 1 Precinct 1 Ward 1 Precinct 2 t�lard 1 Precinct � Ward 2 Precinct 1 Ward 2 Precinct 2 Ward 2 Precinct 3 Ward 3 Precinct 1 Ward 3 Precinct 2 Ward 3 Precinct ' Woodcrest School Hayes School City Hall Fridley Senior High School Rice Creek School North Park School Riverwood School Stevenson School Raslyn Park l,lesl eyan Church SECTION 3. That the polling places will be open from 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. SECTION 4. That the follo�ving people are hereby aopointed to act as Judges for said Election except that the City Cierk is hereby «uthorized to appoint.qualified substitutes in cases of conflict of interest as set forth in Chapter 4, Section 4.05 of the City Charter: Ward 1 Precinct 1 *Marilyn Beck Nancy Londroche t�1ari e Hughes Betty Ba1dwin Doris Tallaksen Carolyn Nolmen Barb Tangren Betty Forster Evey Podesvwa Roy Gritton Clifford Ness Carol Schneider R 7391 Symphony NE R 7361 Jackson NE R 7331 Baker NE R 7371 Lyric NE R 7311 Symp�ony NE R 7310 Tempo NE D 7368 Symphony NE D 7539 Tempo NE D 7542 Tempo NE D 351 74th NE #9 D 7327 Taylor NE D 7663 Jackson NE 7�4-2151 784-8875 784-6898 784-2175 784-7311 786-8981 784-0573 784-8360 786-0916 786-5975 786-2865 784-5201 15 A �� Page 2 Resolution PJo. Ward 1 Precinct 2 , *Joyce McClellan Dorothy Houck Shirley Kohlan Julie Boike ' Pat Holmes Bonnie Kuzyk Mary Sullivan Alice Anderson Mary E. Storley Evelyn Selenski Gloria Wellan Lois Hines Ward 1 Precinct 3 -1976 D 6749 Kennaston NE 571-1560 D 750 Overton NE 571-3249 D 236 Rice Creek Blvd. NE 574-0426 D 6710 2nd St. NE 560-6414 D 6700 Kennaston NE 571-7928 D 280 Rice Creek Blvd. NE 571-568� R 522 66th Ave. NE 571-1198 R 220 Rice Creek Blvd. NE 571-3491 R 414 Rice Creek Terr. NE 571-5429 R 218 69th Place NE 571-7542 R 6793 Uverton fdE 571-4141 R 870 Rice Creek Terr. NE 571-1196 *Velma Pinks R Ardella Buss R Alice Mol R Margaret Poweii R Charleen Swanson R Gloria lvers R Rosel�a Amar D Sharon Hip�en D Nancy Lambert D Vi Lind D Mathilda Rose Johnson D Laverne Brazil D Ward 2.Precinct 1 •*Jenny Locker Betty Brezney Alice Peterson Caroline Svendsen Mrs. Theo. Sasek Lorrie Cook Gerri Engdahl Rita Pierce Muriel Pomeroy Eunice Grier Kay Beihoffer Doris Reiners �1� CI 5973 5th St. NE 6050 5th St. fJE 251 Sylvan NE 6241 Sunrise NE 6010 5th �t. NE 6271 Trinity NE 6121 Sunrise NE 464 57�;h Pl ace NE 5965 4th St. P1E 6221 Trinity NE 5940 5th St. i�E 5529 6th St. NE D 5664 Jackson NE D 690 59th Ave. NE D 5665 Jackson NE D 5741 W. Moore Lake Dr. D 5701 Washing�:on P�E D 5761 W. Moore Lake Dr. R 5897 WashingLOn� NE R 609 Bennett NE' R 5836 Jefferson NE R . 6360 Monroe NE R 6259 Baker NE , R 585 Bennett NE 571-3248 571-6Z22 571-1996 571-6241 571-1679 571-9726 571-1318 574-9474 571-2374 571-3648 571-1393 574-9528 571-7563 571-3806 571-4465 571-6060 574-9818 571-6984 571-3092 571-3650 571-4066 571-2856 571-1555 571-3367 l5 B , • Page 3 Resolution fdo. � Ward 2 Precinct 2 �'' i *Jeanet�e Micholski I Katherine Scott � Karen Bjorgo Pat Anderson Phy]]is Ries Joan Swenson � � ' � ' �►j. Katherine Follmuth Alice Turner Helen Shaffer Marian Smith Chris Aasiand ,Nancy Newport Ward 2 Precinct 3 *Bev Kinsman Jean Wagar Barb Wilson Carolynn Blanding Marlene Sonstegard Georgine Nenkel Judy Engebretson ' Lois Foard Marlys Lisowski Dorothy Oden ' Adeline Swanson Pearl Stiles � Ward 3 Precinct 1 � *Yvonne Sprungman Naida Kruger Betty Bonine � Jo E. Caron Elaine Nielson Myrtle Morphew �, 1 Connie Samuelson Janet Crego Joan Palmquist � ' Evelyn Holtze Jordis Mittlestadt Nina Maeser � � D •6665 Arthur NE D 1632 69th Ave. ME D 6675 Anoka NE D 6631 Lucia Lane NE D 6680 Anoka NE I 6888 Channel Rd. NE R 1621 Onondago N� K 1685 73rd Ave. NE R 6805 Channel Rd. NE R 1611 66 1/2 Ave. NE R 1330 b9th Rve. NE R 6630 Stinson NE R 1348 Hillcrest NE R 5940 Stinson NE R 1541 Trollhagen NE R 5653 Kegis Trail NE R 1249 Hathaway NE R 1340 Hillcrest NE D 5216 Taylor NE U 5228 Pi erce fvE D 5180 Lincoln NE p 5$99 Hackmann NE D 5835 Central Ave. NE I 5885 Tennison NE 574-9571 574-1143 571-6160 574-0203 571-7227 574-9506 784-2454 784-7b96 574-9676 571-8541 574-0362 571-1546 571-0764 571-4660 571-7383 571-0145 57 I -42.51 571-5713 571-6960 571-5941 571-8331 571-5506 571-7638 571-0604 D 7255 East River Road NE 571-1354 D 129 Rickard Rd. NE 571-0934 D 601 Glencoe NE, 786-�321 D 600 Hugo NE 784-8216 D 7144 Riverview Terr.NE 571-6608 D 7948 East River Rd. NE 784-6536 R 7800 East River Rd. NE 571-79�0 R 7854 Alden Way Nt 571-3205 R 139 Glen Cr. Parkway NE 571-7698 R 7680 Alden Way NE 571-2180 R 6940 Hickory �rive NE 571-9172 R 6972 Hickory NE 571-4406 l5 C [� � Page 4 Resalution Nn. 4lard 3 Precinct 2 ' � *Pat Dittes Alene Jonnson Joanne Roetering � Evelyn Horn Darlene Vallin Sabina Nostror� � � � � � -1976 Barb Gohr�an Delores Christenson Pat Gabel Mildred Buck Bobbie Johnson ETaine Sorenson Ward 3 Precinct 3 Mrs. Laverne Roseth Bev Miller Sharon Reemsta Jean Mills Linda Tatley Gladys Syverson *Jean Johnson Doris Larson Veronica Olstead Betty Nelson Germaine Wohlsfeld Ginnie Velin R .�6291 Riverview rterrace R 6490 Riverview Terrace R 182 63 1/2 Way NE R 159 63rd Way NE' R 159 63 1/2 Way NE k 131 57th Place ME D 151 62nd Way NE D 173 Rivers Edge Way NE D 5947 2 1/2 St. NE D 5960 Anna NE D 123 63 1/2 Way NE D 172 Ri versedge 4Jay NE R 4532 2nd St. NE R 401 53rd Ave. NE R 101 53rd Ave. fdE R 5490 3rd St. NE R ii5 Horizon Circle R 117 53rd Ave. N'E D 136 Horizan Circle D 5432 Horizon Drive NE D 5377 Altura NE D 5129 Hori zon Dri ve fdE D 157 Crown Rd. NE D 5105 Horizon Drive NE 560-3853 560-1630 566-5219 560-1899 560-2707 574-0038 560-1564 560-5959 571-1288 566-5665 561-9375 560-1292 560-6967 560- 5616 560-6933 560-5469 560-3771 560-6959 560-5257 560-4166 560-4669 560-5589 560-5477 560-4742 SECTION 5. That the follovring Jud9es are appointed to act as Chairmen of the Election Board for the precincts designated and shall have the duties set forth in Sectiori 203.23 of Minnesota Statutes: Ward 1 Precinct 1 Ward 1 Precinct 2 Ward 1 Precinct 3 ward 2 P►°ecinct 1 41ard 2 Precinct 2 Ward 2 Precinct 3 Ward 3 Pr•eci nct 1 Ward 3 Precinct 2 Ward 3 Precinct 3 Marilyn Beck Joyce McCleilan Velma Pinks Jenny Locker Jeanette Micholski Bev Kinsman Yvonne Sprungman Pat Dittes Jean Johnson 15 D ~ Pa�e 5 P.esol ut i on -1976 SECTION 6. Compensation for said Judges will be paid at the rate of �2.00 per hour for regular Judges and $2.50 for the Chairmen of the Election Goard. • PASSED AND ADOFTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF AUGUST, 1976. ' WILLIAM J. NEE - ��1AYOR ATTEST: MARVIt� C. BRUNSELL - CITY CLERK _1_5 E T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN BRUNSELL, ASSISTANS CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL--SANITARY SEWER, WATER, AND STQRM SE41ER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 119 DATE: AUGUST 13, 1976 The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the final assessment roll and the publication of the hearing notice on Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 119. The work under this project has been completed, and covers the area outlined in the attached Notice of Hearing. MCB ps Atts. �� RESOLUTION N0. - 1976 A RESOLU7I0� DIRECTI�G PREPARATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, AND STORM SEWER IP�PROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 119 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: l. It is hereby determzned that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the follow- ing named improvement, to-wit: SEWER, WATER, AN� STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 119 including all incidental expenses thereto is esti- mate� at $ 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY CO�NCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1976. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR William J. Nee 16 A 0 RESOLUTION N0. - T!976 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARI'NG ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, AND STORM S'EWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 119 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of water mains, sanitary sewer, laterals and service connections, storm sewer, and appu!�tenances. WHEREAS, the C7erk has notified the Council that such proposed assess- ment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFO�E, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka Cou�ty, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley�, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the day of , ' at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for ScWER, 41ATER, ANC STQRM SE'�lER IMPROVEMEPJT PROJECT N0. li9 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of ineeting in the official news�aper of th� City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS ATTEST: CITY CLERK DAY OF Marvin C. Srunsell , 1976. MAYOR William J. Nee 17 CITY OF FP,IDLEY ANOI�,A COUNTY, MINNESOTA 17 � NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FQR SANITARY SEGJER, WATER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVE- MENT PROJE�T N0. 119 Plotice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will.meet at the City Nall in said City on the day of , 1976, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon ali objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvement, ta-wit: SANITARY SEWER, WRTER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVENfENT PROJECT N0� 113 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on �ile and open to public inspection by all persons interested, zn the office o€ the Clerk of` said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral'objections �o the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each �f them is the construction of water nains, sanitary sewer, laterals and service connections, and storm sewer and appurtenances located as follo��rs: Lots 31-35, Revised Auditor's Subdivision h;o. 77 (which includes the proposed Henriksen Plat) and Lat 3, 81UCk ly Mississip�i i(iew Addition. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvemen�ts and each of them is al� that land benefited by said �mprovements ar each of ihem and�lying wi�hin the general area above noted. � � Said improvements will be assessed against �he properties within the abov� noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. � � ' I� A property owner may appeal an assessment to the distr�ct court by serving notiGe of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (`ZO) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such n�tice with �he district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk�. QATED TNIS DAY OF � , 1976, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: MAYOR 4�illiam J. Nee CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell Publish: Fridley Sun an September 1 and 8, 1976 , I� � � ' � � � � � ' � � � � � � � T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY NiANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL--STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1976-1 DATE: AUGUST 13, 1976 The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the final assessment roll and the publication of the hearing notice on Street Improvement Project 1976-1. The work under this project has 6een compleied, and covers the area outlined �n the attached Notice of Hearing. MCB ps Atts. � 1� A RESOLUTION N0. - 1976 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMEiJT PROJECT 1976-1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the follow- ing named improvement, to-wit: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1976-1 including all incidental expenses thereto is esti- mated at $ 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF FRIDLEY THIS QAY OF , 1976• MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell i ' 1 � ' � � ' , , � ' , ' ' , , i ' II, RESOLUTION N0. - 197G A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1976-1 WHEREAS, by a resalution passed by the Cou'ncil on , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot- mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, • water and sanitary sewer services and other facilities. WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assess- ment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the day of at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1976-1 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of ineeting in. the official newspaper of the City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF ATTEST: 1976. MAYOR William J. Nee CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell l9 ' ' � CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, �4INNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT ST. 1976-1 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the Council of the C�ty of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the day of .,�976, at 7:30 o'clock P.M.y to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvement, to-wit: STo 197601 STREE7' TMPROVEMENT PROJECT � 7he propased assessment roll �or each c�f said �rrrpr�vement� is r�ow a�� (il� and open to public inspection by all persons interes�ed, in th� office of the'Clerk of said City. � ' � � ' ' At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral abjections to.the proposed assessments for each of said impr�vements. ' The genera] nature of the �mprovem�nts and each of them is �he COt1Stt"ltG�lOn of street improvements including grading, s�abilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer �ystem, wat�r and sanitary sewer services and other facilities located as follows. 53 2 Avenue 56th Avenue 57th Place 60th Avenue 5th Street 5th Street 6th Sireei 6th Street 71 2 Way 7th Stre�i to P�fadison Street 4th Street ta 6th Sireet 4th Street to %th Sireet 5th Street, to 7th Street I� N� No. 694 �0 57�:h Avenue 60�h Avenue to 6ist Avenue T. H� No. 694 to 57th Aver�ue 60th Avenu� ta 61st Avenue Ri��erv�e�� Terrace to th� East (Menriksen nlat) The area proposed to be assessed for sa�d impravements and cach of them is all , that land benefited by said improvem�nts ar° each of them and l,ying within the general area above noted. . ' Said improvements will be assessed agains� the properties wi�hin the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands �herein contained according to the benefits received. , A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City P�ayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after ', adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. I, DATED THIS DAY OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: ' CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell Publist�: Fridley Sun on September 1 and 8, 1976 , 1976, BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR William J. Nee � 1, T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL -- 1976 SERVICE CONNECTIONS DATE: AUGUST 13, �976 The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the � final assessment roll and the publication of the hearing notice on the 1976 Service Connections. The work under this project has been completed, and covers the area outlined in the attached Notice of Hearing. MCB ps Atts. � 20 RESOLUTION� N0. = 1976 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1976 SERVICE CONNECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of eonstruction with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: 1976 SERVICE CONNECTION ASSESSMENT ROLL for water and sewer mains, laterals, and service connections, including all incidental expenses thereto, is estimated at $ 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to t� specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1976. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell 20 A . RESOLUTION N0. - 1976 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1976 SERVICE CONNECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the day of , 1976, at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the following named improvement: )97b SERVICE CONNECTIONS � 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of ineeting in the official newspaper of the City, at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED P,ND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THTS DAY OF , 1976. MAYOR Wiiliam J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell . 21 � ,�, CITY QF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUN7Y, MINNESOTt� NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR�WA7ER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERUICE CONNECTIONS Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet ai the City Hall in said City on the day of , 1976, at 7:30 P.M. to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assess- ments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: 1976 WATER AhD SEI�ER �1AI�lS, LATERAI.Ss RND SERVICE CONNECTIONS NOT HERETOFQRE FURNISHED RND'RV�IILABLE The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said Citye At said hearing, the Counci� will consider written or oral� objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction and ' furnishing of sewer mains, laterals, and service connections, and water mains, laterals, and service connections in and to tF�e propertiess as follows: Part of Lots 6 and 46, Parcel 165Q Lot l4, Parcel 2020 Parcel 700 Part of Lot`7,. Parcel 420 East�90' of West 107' of Lot 14, Parcel 920 East 80' of laest 187' of Lot 14, Parcel 925 Lot 1, Block 1(TAX FORFETT) E. 75.5' of Lot 3, Block 1� Lot 6, Block 1 Outlot 1 Lot 10, Block 32 Lot 30, Block 9, and South one-half of vacated 47th Avenue Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3 and West 15' of Lot 4, Block 1 Lots 3 and 4 Lots 5-10, Block E Auditor's Subdivision No. 77 Auditor's Subdivision No. 77 Auditor's Subdivision No. 79 Subdivision of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94 Auditor's Subdivision Na. 129 Auditor's Subdivision No. 129 Carl Peterson Addition Froid's Addition Hutberg Addition Hutberg Addition Hyde Park Addition Plymouth Rddition Veit's Addition Veit's Addition Marion's Terrace Addition River View Neights Addition 21A The area proposed to be assessed for said improvernents and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each af them and is the same as those listed above. ' � .� 21B Page 2, NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSME�NT FOR 4JATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS Said improvements will be assessed aga�inst the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDI.EY THIS � DAY OF , �976. MAYOR William J. Nee 0 A7TEST: � CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell Please publish in the Fridley Sun on September 1 and 8s �976 . DISCUSSION REGARDIPdG CONTINUING MEMBERSHIP IN SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 0 22 � � APPOINTMENT FOR CITY CQUNCIL CONSEPJT AND APPROVAL - AUGUST 16, 1976 I� NAME i � Joan Jensen 10i60 Linnet St. N.W. Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433 �� - � � � � � . '� I � � � � � . POSITION SALARY EFFECTIVE DATE REPLACES Secretary $690 August 23, 1976 Judy Wyatt Parks & Recreation per Department Month (Grade 9) 23 LI57' _Of? LICENSES TO BE APPRQVEb BY THE CI'I'Y COU�ti'CIL AT T'EiE MEEiTIh'G OF AUGIIS"f 16, 197G, � 25 I _1'YPE OF LICENSE: '� ON SALE LIQUOR ,� Fridley Recreation �, Service Co. Maple Lanes I�6310 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �'�� SUNDAY LIQUOR Fridley Recreation F� Service Co. ,� Maple Lanes 6310 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley,,bin, 55432 � r VENDII�G P9ACtiINE � Frank's Nursery 7620 Univ. Ave. - Fridley, r4z. 55432 � Goodyear Tixe City 5333 University Ave. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �. Goodyear Tire City �8255 East River t�oad Fridley, h1n. 55432 � � CARNIVAL W. D. Stanley Shows �P.Q. Box 1421 Hot Springs, Arkansas � FQOD ESTABLISHtii1ENT � W. D. Stanley Shows F,O. Box 1421 � Hot Spriiigs, Arkansas '�� Fridley Jaycees Box�32004 , �Fridley, �1n. 55432 Q Petroleum �5300 Central Avenue Fridley, �in. 55432 �Fage 1 of 2. BY: Donald C. Savelkoul Donald C. Save).koul C.A. Erdrua Pepsi Cola Lance Inc. James L. Hale Lance Inc, James L. Hale Wm. D. Stanley Casslene Stanley API'1ZOVEU BY: James Hill Public Safety Dir. James Hill Public Safety bir, Steve plson Health Inspector Steve Olson Health Tnspector Steve Olson Health Tnspector 3ames Hill Public Safety Dir. FEE: $3,375.00 75.00 IS.00 15.00 1.5.00 25.00 (Jaycees asked for $200.00 deposit waived) Council approved 5-2-76.. (Temp.) (Temp.) Wm. D. Stanley R.L. Flanders Brian Toe�os Steve�Olson I�ealth Inspector (CONFIiL�U1TI0N) Already approved. D9axlin Beyleu Steve Olson Nealth Insp�ctor 25.00 Fee tVa i ved 25.00 LIS'f OF I,TCENSES TO BE APPROVF.D f3Y TNE CITY CUUNCIT. AT T'IIF. b1EtiTTN(; OF IIUGUST 16, 1976. 25 A � _.__�.__ ' TYE'F: OF LICEI�Sfi: BY: APPROVIiU BY: FEE: � ICE MACEIINE � Q Petroleum Marlin Be leu y Steve Olson 15.00 5300 Central Ave. Health Inspector � Fridley, Mn. 55432 I CIGARETTE � � Q Petroleum Marlin Beyley James Hill 25.00 5300 Central Avenue Pub2ic Safety Dir. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �',� . I �� I� ;� � � '� � � . . � � � � . , �. � Page 2 of 2. 25 C '� MULTIPLC Dt•lFLLII�a LICENSES 70 BE APPROVED: Period September 1, 1�976 to September 1, 1977 �� r ITS FEE APPROVfD LY: Ob+Id�R ADDRESS UN � William L. Zaier, Jr. 5761 - 2nd St. NE 3 $15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6556 Central Ave. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �� John A. Swanson 5770 - 2nd St. NE 8 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5835 Central Ave. NE Fire Prev. � Fridley, Mn. 55432 Berton N. Cross 5801 - 2nd St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �� Box 26 Fire Prev. Howard, S. Dak. 57349 � Glenn Ba�rott 530 - 120th Lane ��' Coon Rapids, t•in. 55433 Rogers Properties 6512 - 50th Ave. No, Mpls, Mn. 55428 5830 - 2nd St. NE 5851 - 2nd St. NE � Otto G..Tauer 5866 - 2nd St. NE 5866 - 2nd St. r'E , Fridley, Ain. 55432 � Douglas Properties � - 5g80 - 2nd St. NE 2505 Silver Lane N� � Mpls, Mn. 55421 John L. & Lucille B. Calguire 6008 - 2nd St. NE �2018 - 36th Ave. NE Mpls, A1n. 55418 R. J. Bauman 604b - 2% St. NE _ Fridl�y, Mn. 55432 tWaZter H. & Mary A. Sinner 4427 Monroe St, vE Columbia Heights, Mn. 55421 � Lynn D. Hansen 210 - 67th A� e. NE _. Fridley, Mn. 55432 ' � Darold D. Johnson � 4216 - 7th St. NE � Mpls, Mn. 55421 6061 - 2nd St. NE 6511 - 2nd St. NE 6530 - 2nd St. NE 6541 - 2nd St. NE 4 15.00 11 16.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 • 15.00 4 15.00 S 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. e � ' � . Page 1 , . , � MULTIPLE D4�ELLI��G LICEtJSES TO BE APPROVE[�: 25 D Period September 1, 1916 to September 1, 1977 �'� � 041PlER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROVED BY: Jerry Guimont 6551 - 2nd St. NE 7 $15.00 ' R. D. Aldrich, I � 2187 Lakebrook Dr. � Fire Prev. . I . New Brighton, Mn. 55112 • iMarvin C. Erickson 5770 - 2� St. NE ' 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, . 2424 - 119 Ave. NW Fire Prev. �Coon Rapids, "�n. 55433 _ . Albin Johnson 5800 2z St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6824 Ewing No. Fire Prev. � Mpls, Mn. 55429 Albin Johnson 5810 - 2� St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, � same address as above Fire Prev. Paul K. La Pointe 5820 - 2% St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �1528 McAfee St. Fire Prev. St. Paul, Mn. 55106 James R. Lund � ,2417 :- 148th Ave. NE Anoka; Mn., 55303 �John Ouellette 848 - 82nd Ave. NE Spring Lake Park, Mn. 55432 �J. W., Lindholm 2529 Parkview* Blvd. ripls, Mn. 55422 � Dale Knott 3945 Reservior Blvd. � Mpls, Mn. 55421 � R. J. Bauman 6046 - 21� St: NE � Fridley, Mn. 55432 Arnold Elmquist 8140 Long Lake Rd. NE I', � Mpls, Mn. 55432 �Arnold Elmquist same address as above �ArnoZd Elmquist same address as above 'I � � 5846 - 2% St. NE 5901 - 2� St. NE 5924 - 2� St. NE 5980 - 2 z St . NE 6060 - 2� St. NE 4901 - 3rd St. NE 4913 - 3rd St. NE 4921 - 3rd St. NE Page 2 6 15.00 4 15.00 7 15.00 7 15.00 4 15.00 7 15.00 7 7 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 0 � 25 E MULTIPI..E D�JELLI�lG LICE�ISES i'0 QE APPROVED: . Period September 1, 1976 to September 1, 1977 � 0'�l��ER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROVED BY: �Arnold Elmquist 4939 - 3rd St. NE 7 $15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 8140 Long Lake Rd. NE Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55432 " • , Arnold Elmquist 4949 - 3rd St. NE 7 T5.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. �John D. Miller 4965 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldricn, 5015 NE University Ave. Fire Prev. I Tipls, Ain. SSG21 � C. H. Miller �i985 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1095 Polk Cir. NE Fire Prev. ',� Mpls, Mn: 55421 C. H. Miller 5005 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. I� W. W. & Loa Untinen 5025 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich 4550 Central Ave. NE Fire Prev. � Mpls, Mn. 55421 � I� ' Bigos Prop2rties 5200 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, ' �2020 Nicollet Ave. Fire Prev. rzpis, rsn_. 55404 Bigos Properties 5201 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, ', same address as above Fire Prev. Bigos Properties 5230 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Alc3rich, same address as above Fire Prev. � � Bigos Properties 5231 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, �same address as above Fire Prev. Bi os Pro erties 5260 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich g P , same address�as above . Fire Prev. , Bi os Pro erties 5261 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich g P , same address as above Fire Prev. i�� Bigos Properties 5290 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, ' same address as above Fire Prev. � Bigos Properties 5291 - 3rd St. NE 11 16.�0 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. �Gerald L. Miller 5420 - 5th St. NE, Apt. 2 Fridley, Mn. 55421 i! � 5900 - 3r.d St. NE Page 3 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. • 25 F � MULTIPLE Db1ELLI�JG LICG�dSES TO QE APPROVED: Period September 1, 1976 to September 1, 1977 '� ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROVED QY: O�11JER '�, � Mervin L. Byrne 5955-65 - 3rd St. NE 4 $15.00 . R. D. Aldrich, 5955 - 3rd St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 . '. � �' � Richard C. Welk 5974 - 3rd St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 4090 Decatur Ave. No. Fire Prev. � New Hope, Mn. 55427 David C. Nelson 5980 - 3rd St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 20186 Connie Dr. Fire Prev. � Anoka, Mn. 55303 � Elliot �1. Benincasa 6051-53-55 - 3rd St. NE 3 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �6061 - 3rd St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �Elliot V. Benincasa 6061-63-65 - 3rd St. NE 3 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as a�bove Fire Prev. �Richard Veth & Roland E. Waller 290 - 61st Ave. NE Fridley, Mn. 55432 'Georgia M. & Richard H. Lund 5320 - 4th St. NE Fridley, Mn. 55421 � Duane L. Schwartz 5347 - 4th St. NE �Fridley, Mn. 55421 Donald E. Klostreich 2509 Hillview Rd. � Moundsview, rin. 55432 Terrance H. riicicley �7075 Hickory Drive Fridley, Mn. 55432 1 James S. Burman 5378 - Sth St. NE Fridley, Mn. 55421 �Curtis Bostrom 5652 Regis Trail Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Cu�rtis Bostrom - same address as above � � 6071-73 - 3rd St. NE 290 - 61st Ave. NE 5320 - 4th St. NE 5347-49 - 4th St. NE 5401 - 4th St. NE 5419 - 4th St. NE 5378-5384 - 5th St. NE 5400 - 5th St. 2�E 5410 - 5th St. NE Page 4 3 15.00 4 15.00 3 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. . R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. • , 25 G MULTIPLE D4ICLLItlG I.ICCPaSES TO QE APPROVED: ' ' Period September 1, 1976 to September 1, 1977 . 041NER AQDRESS UNITS FEE APPROVED BY. iGerald L. Miller 5420 - Sth St. NE 4 $15.00 ' R. D. Aldrich, 5420 - 5th St. NE, Apt. 2 Fire Prev. . Fridley, Mn. 55421 � �. � W. Frederick Hawkins 5428 - Sth St. NE 4 15.00 R, D. Aldrich, . 2800 N. Hamline, L�pt. 302 � Fire Prev. � Roseville, Pin. 55113 . R. Smith & C. W. Hommeyer 5451 - 5th St. NE 32 37.00 R. D. Aldrich, 3504 Larchwood � Fire Prev. � Minnetonka, t•in. 55343 . Harold•D. Plorrow 5430 - 7th St. NE 34 39.00 R. D. Aldrich, �Rt. 4, Box 28 Fire Prev. River Falls, Wisc. 54022 �Udell Larson 5460 - 7th St. NE 34 39.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6848 Knoll St. Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55427 • �Kenn�eth Franko 5612 - 7th St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1575J - 1�Sth Ave. N. Fire Prev. Rt. 6 � � Anoka, Mn. 55303 Kenneth Franko 5640 - 7th St. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, , same address as above Fire Prev. Bigos Properties 215 - 53rd Ave. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �2020 Nicollet Ave. Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55404 Bigos Properties 305 - 53rd Ave. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, � same address�as above Fire Prev. Wayne W. Siewert 251 - 57th Place NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �3320 - 48th Ave. So. Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55406 �Otto G. Tauer 359 - 57th Place NE 8 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5866 - 2nd St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �R. J. Bauman 105 - 58th Ave. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6046 - 2� St. N� Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 . � � • � Page 5 ' ' �,' � � � _ - 25 H i'I I'� � QE APPROVED: I MULTIPLC D4JELLI��a LICEPlSES TO . Period Septentber 1, 1976 to September 1, 1977 ' � 041WER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROVED BY: ,Dale H. Egland 150 - 59� Way NE 12 $17.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5108 Brighton Lane Fire Prev. New Brighton, Mn. 55112 ' • ,� & Roger M. Ruetten 5919 Oldfield Ave. • �Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Tro icana Com an 190 - 59% Wa NE 12 17.00 R. D. Aldrich P P Y 2 y � 6250 Wayzata Blvd. Fire Prev. � Mpls, Mn. 55416 Tropicana Company 191 - 59% Way NE 12 17.00 R. D. Aldrich, � same address as above Fire Prev. K.B.M. Investment Co. 1619 - 73rd Ave. NE 24 � 29.00 R. D. A].drich, � 3005 Ottawa Ave. So. Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55416 Behun & Peterson Realty 351 - 74th Ave. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, �1607 Bunker Lake Blvd. NE Fire Prev. Anoka, Mn. 55303 ,Behun & Peterson Realty 389 - 74th Ave. NE ' 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, Same address as above Fire Prev. �Behun & Peterson Realty 415 - 74th Ave. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, Same address as above Fire Prev. Kenneth G. & Jo Ann K. Larson 350 - 75th Ave. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, � 3232 Independence Ave._ No. Fire Prev. Pipls, Mn. 55427 iWilliam C. & Robert L. Holmquist 3608 Admiral Lane 450 - 75th Ave. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, Mpls, Mn. 55429 � Fire Prev. � Willam C. & Robert L. Holmquist same address as above 476 - 75th Ave. NE 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. � Paul M. Burkholder 106 - 77th Way NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 7860 Alden Way Fire Prev. � Fridley, Mn. 55432 Jeffrey D. Mosiman 181 - 79th Way NE 8 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1 9242 Flanders St. NE Fire Prev. ripls, rin. 55434 . 1 � Page 6 1 �_ _ I 25 I � „ MULTIPLC 04JELLI��G LICCNSES TO BE APPROUED: . Period September 1, 1976 to September 1, 1977 � 04lNER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROVFD BY: ,M. A. Biddle 211 - 79th Way NE 8 $1.5.00 R. D. Aldrich, 4800 S. Cedar Lake Rd. Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55416 �. tVirginia T. Carlson 231 - 79th Way NE� 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 231 - 79th Way NE, Apt. 5 � Fire Prev. � Fr3dley, Mn. 55432 Donald C. Anderson 5960-80 Anna St. NE 33 38.00 R. D. Aldrich, 3319 Belden Dr. NE � Fire Prev. , St. Anthony, Mn. 55418 . William,L. Zaier, Jr. 6550 Central Ave. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Al.drich, �6556 Central Ave. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �SPGA Associates 909 Farmers & riechanics Bldg. Mpls, Mn. 55402 �SPGA Associates same address as above 1 Nathan Schwartz 5916 Medicine Lake Rd. Mpls, Tin. 55422 , Nathan Schw�rtz same address as above �Nathan Schwartz same address as above �Skywood Apartments Suite•300, 372 St. Peter St. St. Paul, Mn. 55102 � Skycaood Apartments same address as above 1 Skywood Apartments same address as above 1 Skywuod Apartments same address as above �Vernon S. Hoium 92S Dain Tower Mpls, Mn. 55402 , � ,� 6551 Channel Road 6571 Channel Road 101 Charles St. NE 179 Charles St. NE 180 Charles St.�NE 1200 Cheri Lane 1230 Cheri Lane 1260 Cheri Lane 1290 Cheri Lane 5940 East River Rd. Page 7 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 11 12 12 12 18 18 18 18 12 16.00 R. D..Aldrich, Fire Prev. 17.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 17.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 17.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 23.00 R. D. Aldrich, ' Fire Prev. 23.00 23.00 23.00 17.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. . � � 25 J � MULTIPLC D4JELLI�JG LICC��SES TO QE APPROVED: ' Period 5eptember 1, 1976 to September 1, 1977 �� 04l�JER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROVED BY: Victor Lohmann 5950 East River Rd. , 12 $17.00 R. D. Aldxich, ',1357 County Rd. H2 . Fire Prev. St. Paul, Mn. 55110 . �John H. Ouellefte 6551 East Ri.ver Rd. 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, 848 - 82nd Ave. NE Fire Prev. Spring Lake Park, Mn. 55432 � Paul M. Burkholder 76�3 East River Rd.' 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 7860 A1den 41ay Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 � � Five Sands Development Co. 7805 East River Rd. 59 64.00 R. D. Aldrich, Hirsch-Newman Co. Fire Prev. �8800 Hwy. 7 Mpls, Mn. 55�-26 �Five Sands Development Co. 7825 East River Rd. 59 64.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above � Fire Prev. Five Sands Development Co. 7845 East River Rd. 59 64.00 R. D. Aldrich, � same address as above Fire Prev. Five Sands �evelopment Co. 7875 East River Rd. 59 64.00 R. D. Aldrich, ' same address as above � Fire Prev. Five Sands Development Co. 7895 East River Rd. 59 64.00 R. D. Aldrich, Isame address as above Fire Prev. Leonard Dailey 8191 East Rive� Rd. 5 15.00 R. D. Aldri ch, 8191 East River Rd. Fire Prev. � Fridley, P1n. 55432 . Norman E. Shuldheisz 6341 Highway �665 NE 10 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �1256'- 8th Lane Fire Prev. Anoka, Mn. 55303 �Arnold Elmquist 6370 Highway �f�65 NE 15 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 8140 Long Lake Rd. 1060 - 64th Ave. NE Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55432 �John A. Swanson 6379 Highway �C65 NE 8 1.5.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5835 Central Ave. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 ' Arnold Elmquist 6393 Highway 4�65 NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 8140 Long Lake Rd. , Fire Prev. Pipls, Mn. 55432 j' � � . . Arnold Elmquist 6417 Highway 4�65 NE �, 8 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, � same address as above Fire Prev. �i Page 8 � • � , � -,,,� ' � 25 K MULTIPLE D4JCLLIPdG LICENSLS TO aC APPROVED: Perioci September 1, 1976 to September 1, 1977 '�, 041NER ADDRESS UNITS FFE APPROVED BY: �Bigos Properties 5100 Horizon Dr. NE 5 $15.00 ' R. b. Aldrich, 2020 Nicollet Ave. Fire Prev. Mpls, Mn. 55404 � . � Bigos Properties 5101 Horizon Dr.'NE �7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, . same address as above - Fire Prev. ', Stanley J. & Ann Kania 430 Ironton St. NE 3 15.00 R. D. Aldri.ch, 430 Ironton St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 � � Lucia Lane Apartments G670 Lucia Lane NE 16 21.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6670 Lu�ia Lane Fire Prev. � Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lucia Lane•Apartments 6680 Lucia Lane NE 16 21.00 R.,D. Aldrich, , 6680 Lucia Lane Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lucia Lane Apartments 6690 Lucia Lane NE 16 21.00 R. D. Aldrich, � 6690 Lucia Lane Fire Prev. Fridiey,�Mn. 55432 'Arno E. Rosin 7400 Lyric Lane NE 8 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 7400 Lyric Lane NE, Apt. 2- Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Bruce Anderson � 4030 Main St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1815 Cleveland NE Fire Prev. Pipls, rin. 55418 � Kenneth F. Peterson 60iZ Main St. NR 4 15.00 R. D. �Idrich, 2441 Lyndale Ave. So. Fire Prev. � Mpls, Mn. 55405 Kenneth F..Peterson 6019 riain St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1 same address as above Fire Prev. Rodne M. Waara 6021 Main St. NE 4 Z5.00 R. D. Aldrich y , 6021 Main St. NE Fire Prev. 1 Fridley, Mn. 55432 . Richard W. Hart 6035 Main St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �6035 Main St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, rin. 55432 ,bonald C. Wescom 117 Mississippi Pl. NE , 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 117 Mississippi P1. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 • � Page 9 � � . � 25 L � t�1ULTIPLE Db1ELLI�dG I_ICf�JSES 70 QE APPROVED: I, � Period September 1, 197G to September 1, 1977 , i06JNER ARDftESS UNITS, FEE APPROVCU �Y: �R. J. Bauman 140 Mississippi Pl. PdE 4 $15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6046 - 2'-2 St. N� Fire Prev. Fridley, Mn. 55432 , '� Innsbruck North Associates 1601 No. Innsbruck Drive 258 263.00 R. D. Aldrich, 7286 No. 72nd Lane Fire Prev. Brooklyn Park, Mn. 55428 � Highland Park Development Co. 610 Osborne Rd. NE 9 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 9741 Foley Blvd. Fire Prev. , Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433 � Highlar�d Park Development Co. 630-65Q Osborne Rd. NE 34 39.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. � Highland Park Development Co. 670-690 Osborne Rd. NE 34 39.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. , A. T. Gearman 5650 Polk St. NE 32 37.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6225 University Ave. NE Fire Prev. � Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Gordon J. A��enson 6489 Riverview Terrace 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 17 Rice Cree?c [7ay Fire Prev. , Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Edstrom Realty 155-Z75 Satellite Lane NE 33 38.00 R. D. Aldrich, �960 East P1ark St. Fire Prev. Winona, Mn. 55987 �Edstrom Realty 195 Satellite Lane NE 20 25.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. James Wells 221 Satellite Lane I3E 11 16.00 R. D. Aldrich, �Rio De Janiero, � Fire Prev. Brazil �Carl W. Lidberg 6111 Star Lane NE 18 23.00 R. D. Aldrich, 3816 Central Ave. NE Fire Prev. Mpls, Pin. 55421 i � 1 � Page 10 � � � �.° =� — � 26 � ' ESTIMATES FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - AUGI�ST 16, 1976 � . Smith, Juster, Feikema, Chartered • , 1250 Builders Exchange Building � Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 For legal services rendered by Carl Newquist as � Prosecutor for July, 1976 • $ 2,228.75 , , Weaver, Talle & Herrick � 316 East Main Street . Anoka, Minnesota 55303 For legal services rendered by Virigl Herrick, , City Attorney for July, 1976 $ 1,185.25 � ' ' - 1 . � i � i . � � � � � � � � � 1 Zs n DATE � 9 , FORWARDED FROM LAST STATEMENT 8-02-76 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley. July, 1976 Retainer. $1000.00 Secretarial Services 100.00 Time in excess of 30 hours (32 hours 10 minutes) $1128.75 � 1 deciare nder pena+iies of 'aw tt�at� t�his accau , c aim or c: ar,C is ;�st zr.d cor- rect d f,�no p�r uf it i,�as ;ee;; pa� �gn�� of Cta SMITH. JUSTER, FEIKEMq, CHqRTERED ATTCRNEVS AT LAW ��3 �si !ox ~ 1 TIr"E RECOP.D FC�� JULY, 1976 PR.OSECUTIOtI 6�!QP,K l. Pre!�aration, Travel and Tirne in Court for 31 Court cases and 52 Jurv Pre-7ria1 Conferences. 2. Investioation and Process of Com;�laints including office conferences, �hone con- ferEnces, corresnond�nce and preoaration of 3 formal com;�la i nts . 3. Court and Police Administration. • 9ALANCE $1000.00 $1]00.00 $2228.75 43 hours 10 minutes 14 hours 15 minut�s 4 hours 45 minutes TOTAL 62 hours 10 minutes � 1 1 .CH!-HLES R. WEAVER �HERPAAN L. TALI.E VIRGiI C. HERRICK FtOdERT MUNNS vVI�UAM K. GOODRICH TtiOM.HS A. GEDDE ' JEFFAEV P. HICKEN 'I 'c�ty of Fridley �AYJ OFF�CES WEAVER, TALLE & HERRICK 316EA5T MAIN STREE? ANOKA,MINNESOTASSJ03 411 541] August 12, 1976 26 B INVOICE N� 495 ' July Retainer� $1,000.00 ' 'Council Meetings 10-3/4 hours Staff Meetings 2 hours Conferences with Staff 6 hours �Memos and Legal Research 8 hours Ordinance Preparation 3 hours Citizens Inquiries 2 hours �I� ' . 31-3/4 hours Hours in Excess of 30 @$35.00 per hour 61.25 ', �Secretarial Allowance 100.00 Expenses Advanced: Clerk of District Court Re: Hayden-Murphy Equipment Company 13.00 '' Fee for Service of Papers Re: A. J. Chromy Construction Co. 11.00 � ' � ' TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,185.25 0