The URL can be used to link to this page

12/20/1976 - 5733JANET KONZAK ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 20, 1976 _.: _ � � � � ' I � i_ ..__ . _._./�_�-.._ . . , � � 229 � , � 1 THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINr, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIt OF DECEMBER 20, 1976 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of December 20, 1976 was called to order at 7:39 p.m. by P4ayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and the audience in sayin4 the Pledae of Alleoiance to , the Flag. • ROLL CALL: • MEMBERS PRESENT: Rlayor Nee, Councilman Hamernik, Councilwanan Kukowski, Councilman . $tarGaalt, and Councilman Fitznatrick. MEM6ERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: REGULAR P1EETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1976: Councilman Hamernik stated that on pa�e 1 under Old Business in the first motion it should be "as recommended by the Appeals Commission," not Planning Commission. Also, on page 4 under PJew Business, the item re4ardin4 Resolution PJo. 118-1976, in the last paragraph on the paqe, the second sentence should be deleted. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to approve the minutes as amended. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votin� a,ye, Mayor P�ee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Nee stated that he would like an item added to the a�enda for discussion; that being, "Consideration of One-Way Designation on Lucia Lane." MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adont the aoenda with the addition as suaaested. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, P9ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION Of APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REOUEST L.S. #76-12, BY DICK GREGOR; LOCATED 0�� 73RD AND 73'z AVENUES PJ.E. TABLED 12 6/76 : Mr. Dick Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated that this is a request for a lot split for a parcel of property alie�nin� north of 73rd Avenue and south of Onondaga Street. The item was tabled untit after the public hearin� for consideration of the pronosed plat of prooerty directly to the east of the proposed lot split. The Plannina Commission did recommend approval of the lot split with the stipulation that a certain amount of property be dedicated for street pur�oses in order to maintain and extend the street pattern in the area. He further stated that it should be pointed out that what is proposed in the platting to the east.is consistent as to what is bein� recommended for approval of the lot split. Mr. Grecror was also present to answer or ask any questions. Mr. Sobiech further stated that one of the stipulations of the nr000sed olattinc� was that the owner of the pr000sed piatted property acquire the necessary easements for the accumulation of the traffic pattern. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the lot split. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votina aye, Mayor Plee declared the motion carried unanimously. • , i � � � � I � ! � I I i i � I 230 REC�ILAR COUNCIL MEETIt�G OF DECEPABER 20, 1976 T READIN� OF AN ORDIPIAPlCE FOR STREET AND ALLEY VACATION REOUEST PAGE 2 Mayor Nee stated there had been a public hearin� renardinn this. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading and adopt the ordinance on the first readinq. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERA_T_ION OF APPROVAL OF FIMAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S. #76-09, DELEIER ADDITION. BY n't' • Mr. Sobiech stated that this is the remaini�n� parcel of property on which there was a public hearing. At the aublic hearing, there were no ob,jections to the proposed plat which would result in a continuation of 73'Z Avenue to the east and then the extension of Lakeside Road. He further stated that althounh the �roperty is zoned R-1 to the north � half and R-3 to the south half, at present it is the intention of the petitioner to develop sinqle family. The stipulation from the Plannin� Commission is that the petitioner contact all remaining property owners reaardina any additional ric►ht-of-way that would be required for providing the improvement for 732 Avenue. P1r. Sobiech oroceeded to show the City Council a sketch on the easel. It was further noted that the front width of the southerly four lots in the R-3 zoned area would only be 72.25 feet instead of the standard 75 feet. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the final plat with the variance duly noted and with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner is reauired to obtain the necessary easements to provide 73%Z and Lakeside right-of-way and (2) that in the event the property is developed into multiple dwellings that all access be off 73rd Avenue residential streets. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S. #76-11, REAL ESTATE 10 ADDITION, BY FRANCIS J. GIRDLER, GENERAL Y LOCATED IN THE NE OUADRAP�T OF I.694 AND HIGHWAY 65 N.E.: Mayor Nee stated there was a public hearin4 regarding this and there were no objections. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the final plat. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. AL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S. #76-10, INNSBRUCK VILLAGES REL A. FARR DEVELOPP1ENT CORP., GE{VERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF ND 4JES F THE BL CK FORES PARTMENTS: Mr. Sobiech stated that regarding the proposed final plat, the petitioner wants to add an additional two structures of townhouses to the already previously recorded Innsbruck Village plat. He further stated there would be a trade of proqerty from the apartment complex to Innsbruck Village Second so that there is an even parcel of property swapped in order to maintain the existing areas and to allow the construction of the two townhouse structures. Mr. Sobiech stated that another concern was the public walkway system and there is a letter on file which indicates that the developer will maintain and provide the necessary easements. Mr. Nasim Qureshi, City Manager, asked P1r. Sobiech if there were any negative concerns from Innsbruck North Association. Mr. Sobiech stated there were none that the Planning � Commission was aware of. - h�TION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the final pla� with the letter of condition regarding the walkway, maintenance, etc., and that the two parcels be combined into one parcel for tax purposes. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P.S. #76-05, INNSBRUCK NORTH REPLAT Mayor Nee stated that they now have a memorandum from the City Attorney and a letter from the Townhouse Association. � l_.. _.__ � �. — - - — - - _ �_ _ .. _. . . _ � � — � ! � �`I � � � � , � I� � i � f ' . � � � r � ► � � � i � � ! � i ; REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 20, 1976 ___,...�. _� ..._ _, :... 23� � � `.�� , � : �� , PA6E 3 ! � . MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the memorandum,dated'December 20, 1976 1• from Virgil C. Herrick, City Attorney, regardinq the replatting of Innsbruck North ' Third Addition. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, � Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the letter dated December 19, 1976 from the I Townhouse Association, Mr. Jack Lindstrom,'President. Seconded by Councilwoman ' Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jack Lindstrom, President of the Townhouse Association stated that he had a statement regarding the aforementioned letter which he proceeded to read. The substance of such letter being the result of a discussion amon4 the entire seven member Board of Directors of the Innsbruck North Townhouse Association. He further stated that the Board felt that the decision made by the Executive Committee on September 8th, 1976 did not fully reflect the opinions of the residents directly affected and more importantly, encroached upon the property already owned by the Association members in the form of common ground. He stated that in the future, as in the past, they will qive the developer the cooperation needed to complete construction of the area. However, when there arises a situation where the needs of the developer infringe on the lawful rinhts of resident member/owner of the Association and all possible compromises fail, then as a Board they must show their first consideration to the people who elected them to protect their investment. Mr. Virgil Herrick, City Attorney, then stated that regardinq the memorandum he wrote to the City Council, he essentially wanted to review their authority and obligation as far as replatting and amendments to the oriqinal townhouse plan. He further stated that he has reviewed the Articles and By-laws of the Association and the restrictive covenants and he came to the conclusion that the developer could not do what he proposes without the Board of Directors of the Association and the Architectural Control Committee. Therefore, Mr. Herrick advised the City Council that in view of the lack of approval � of the two aforementioned bodies, the matter should be tabled until such tir�e as the ; developer and the Association can reach an agreement. He further stated that if tabled, ' it should be for a limited period of time as well. It should not be for more than two or ' three months. If, however, it is not brouqht back within that period of time, the application should be considered void or the Council will at that time consider something that will put it within a reasonable period of time. Mr. James London, 7286 72nd Lane, Minneapolis, stated that he would like to talk with Darrel Farr regarding this and hopes that there is some agreement they can reach with the Board of Directors. Councilman Starwalt asked what the Association's feelinqs were reQardinq this and Mr. Lindstrom stated that as mentioned in his statement, they will do everything possible to cooperate with the developer. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to table the matter for three months with the understanding that it will return for final action at that time. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COFIMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 8, 1976: GEORGETOWN MOTEL, INC., ZOA �76-06, 5600 MAIN STREET N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the public hearinq for meeting of January 17, 1977. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ROBERT SCHROER, ZOA #76-07, BETWEEN 77TH AND 79TH AVE. N.E. ON EAST SIDE OF RANCHER'S ROAD: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to set the public hearin� for meetin� of January 17, �T977..�,.Secor�ded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote;!all votins� aye,:.N�ayor__ `.,Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ROBERT SCHROER, L.S. #76-11, 7875 AND 7895 RANCHER'S ROAD N.E.: Mayor Nee stated that this did not need any action. CITY OF fRIDLEY, SAV #76-07, ROAD EASEPIENT ON TALPIADCE LANE AND 75TH 41AY: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick set the public hearina for meeting of February 14, 1977. Seconded by Councilman hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � ` , � ; � � I � ! 1 — 1 �'. �. _. ._.., ..,,. .:�_ '--.. _ . __ , 232 � � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETI�G OF DECEMBER 20, 1976 PAGE 4 MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive the minutes of the Planning Cor.imission. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votinn aye, Mayor �lee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CATV COMP1ISSION MEETING OF DECEPIBER 2, 197fi: TOUR OF EARTH SATELLITE FACILITIES (MONTICELLO AREA): Councilman Fitzpatrick sugqested that the Administration arrange a date for the proposed expedition and bring the details back to them. A Saturday date for the tour would be arranned. Mr. Oureshi asked if any Saturday would do. Councilwoman Kukowski , corrmented that she had not received a calendar yet. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the minutes of the CATV Commission. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION�OF APPROVING METROPOLITAN ANIP1AL PATROL SERVICE, IDlC. COPJTRACT FOR 1977• Mr. Qureshi, City �lanager, stated that this is a revised contract for patrol services between the Metropolitan Animal Patrol Service, Inc. and the Citv of Fridley. Ne further stated that at present, NIAPSI provides services to fifty-two suburban communities� along with the City of P1inneapolis. The present rate for furnishina patrol ambulance is $8.50 and the proposed rate is $8.75; the present rate for boarding any species of animal impounded is $2.25 and the pro�osed rate is $2.50; the present rate for destroying dogs or cats if $3.00 and that will remain the same; the oresent rate for ambulance service of injured animals is $9.00 and the proposed rate is $10.00; the present rate for services during other than scheduled workinc� hours is $10.00 and the proposed rate is $12.00. I'� ,. Mr. Qureshi further stated that all the data has been reviewed and the changes are in line with those costs and services for the City of Minneapolis. � MOTION by CounciTman Hamernik to approve the contract with the tletropolitan Animal ' Patrol Service, Inc. Seconded by Counci7man Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor PJee declared the motion carried unanimously. . RESOLUTION N0. 122-1976 - AUTHORIZING CHAPIGIPJC, THE 1976 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 4JITHIN � THE GENERAL FUND: Mr. Qureshi stated that basically this has been an extensive voter turnout and it did � increase the cost of election by $1,500. He then referred to item number two, Police budget, and after reviewing thei.r data a little more closely, Mr. Qureshi recommended that the section be deleted; and instead of takin� A2,150, we will only take $150 out of the Public Works Plaintenance budqet. � The adjustment of the Naturalist's budget is basically due to the contract that the City � has awarded for services. This money would come back to the Citv. Also, the CETA monies ; that have been received wil] be used in these different areas. All of the second section listed on the resolution is CETA money. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 122-1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion I carried unanimously. ' RESOLUTION NQ. 723-197b - AUTHORIZIPJG EXECUTIQN OF TECNPlICAL ASSISTANCE AGREE�IENT WITFf + I9//' ._— � � Mr. Sobiech stated that this is an annual request from the Ptinnesota Highway Department which allows the City to ente:^ �nto an aareement with the Hiahway Department for any type ' of assistance the City needs from them throuahout the year. MOTION by Cour•cilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution Plo. 123-1976. Seconded by Cauncilman �• Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votinn aye, Mayor PJee declared the motion carried i unanimously. I_ _ ..__ _ ;� �. y .� . � , � � � , � i � , � i � � t � . � REGULAR COUNCIL i1EETING GF OECEMBER 20, 1976 TION N0. 25-1476 IN FAVOR OF IMPROVEMENT AMD __nFi i i,� nn nRt��F- N0. 124-1976 - ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICA 233 , � PAGE 5 , � �SFD � �, : � i MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive Petition No. 25-1976 in favor of improvement. , Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votina aye, Mayor Nee declared �� the motion carried unanimously. i � MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive Petition No. 26-]976 in opposition to improvement. I ,� Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ( ' i � � Councilman Starwalt then made reference to the third siqnature on the petition in opposition to the improvement. Mr. Robert B. Tourville's address should be 6379 Dellwood Drive N.E., not 6378 Del7wood Qrive N.E. Als�, on the map of the area Mr. Tourvi7le's address, 6379 Dellwood Drive N.E., should be dotted as bein� in opposition to the improvement. ' Councilman Starwalt further stated that on the east side of Dellwood, lot �l, the owner i of that property is in favor and would .sign anythinq requested by Staff. He stated that f all twenty-five owners have been contacted either by him or someone else in favor of the i project. Those who signed in opposition, he personally contacted and at present; there ' •are thirteen residents in favor of the petition, eleven against. I MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to reinstate it into the street improvement project along � with Peirce Str•eet and 63rd Avenue and adopt Resolution No. 124-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � I Councilman Starwalt then continued to state that at 6450, the owner of that property � , originally had signed in opposition but after reviewing the matter and after some reflection, he did not want to re-siqn in opposition. They likewise did not sian in favor. Also, on the extreme south, the property on the corner for sale, both husband and wife ' previo�sly were in accord and now the qentleman is in favor and the wife is in opposition. � i Councilman Starwalt further stated that he has been accused of having a financial interest in the matter. He, therefore, stated for the record that "I do not have any financial interest at all in this street or any other street and my concern was to try to be fair � and square with all persons to make sure that the people would be represented wholly and straight forward.° � Councilman Starwalt did comment that Mr. Tourville was present. Mr. Tourville stated ; that he was not in opposition to the improvement of DeTiwood Drive. The oniy thinq that i he was not in favor of was narrowinq the width of the street and curbs. Also, he was i not in favor of setting aside a certain amount of the price that is being charged for the street for repairs on the sewer, if there are any repairs to be made. ( Mr. Qureshi stated that if there are problems with the sewer, the problems are going to ; be corrected and the money to do this comes out of the utility fund and not through � assessment of the people. As far as the street construction, that cost is assessed , against the property. , Councilman Starwalt stated that what he told Mr. Tourville was incorrect. He told him � that the cost of the project was the correction and repair necessary for underground ' services. ' ! RESOLUTION N0. 125-1976 - AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR A STREET SWEfPER: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution No. 125-1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Mayor Nee deciared the motion carried unanimously. � � I _ — _ L_. � --- _ -'-- - - -. - -�----?-. - . ! I � � - _ �I � . j I � i � 234 REGIlLAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 20, 1976 PAGE 6 UTION N0. 126-1976 - AUTHORIZING AND.DIRECTING THE SPLITTING Of SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AUUlIlUN HND Ht'PURTIONING INTO INNSBRUCK VILLAGES: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution No. 126-1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOl�UTION N0. 127-1976 - AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTINr, THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL 4860, SECTION 14 AND APPORTIONING INTO ALICE WALL ADDITION: MOTION by Council Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 127-1976. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon•a voice vote, all votinc� aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . RECEIVING RESIGNATION--DENNIS L. SCHNEIDER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the resignation. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS: � MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to pay Claim No's. 18128 - 18362. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES: Smith, Juster, Feikema, Chartered 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 � For Legal Services Rendered as Prosecutor for the Month of November, 1976 $1,502.50 Weaver, Talle & Herrick 316 East Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 For Legal Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of November, 1976 $1,720.66 MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to approve the estimates as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor PJee declared the motion carried unanimously. . LICENSES: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's office. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVIN� REPORT ON COMPENSATION PLAN fOR C,RADED EMPLOYEES: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive and concur. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF ONE-WAY DESIGNATION ON LUCIA LANE: Mayor Nee stated his curiosity about the one-way desianation on Lucia Lane in that it appears that the Council never took any action to initiate this. Mr. Sobiech stated that they were not able to find any specific actions in the Minutes. Mr. Oureshi stated that there were numerous discussions reaardina this. Mr. Herrick concurred with Mr. Qureshi's statement. He further cammented that initially, the people compiained about the traffic pattern in the neighborhood. Mr. Sobiech stated that the consensus from the Pol•ice 1 i__.. _ -- � � � j �' ;�.. _ _ _ _ _r.. . ,. �� . _ _ _ . , _ . ._.. --: . _ _ .._ . � ..�.._,_,.,. . �- - - - - - - - G35 I� ; � ; '� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Of DECEMBER 20, 1976 PAGE 7 k � . Department from the people was that it has resulted in a much safer situation. 68th ��' � f Avenue does not generate traffic. What qenerates the traffic is the Knights of Columbus Hall. He further stated that they have contacted the Highway Department and they will study the situation as it presently exists. Mr. Qureshi stated that there is no � question that it is a safer route, however, there is definitely an inconvenience to the I� people living on Lucia Lane. ' � Councilman Starwalt suggested that Staff get the back�round data on this and perhaps . � review with the Knights of Columbus and see just what can be done in this regard. � , Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that maybe a need could be shown for signalization without having to actually accumulate an accident record. ' Mayor Nee stated in summary that he was sympathetic with the people living there. � � i ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilwoman.Kukowski to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. I� � Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously �. and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of December 20, 1975 adjourned ` at 9:34 p.m. � . , � � � Respectfully submitted, , ! �;� � � . � � �� ' Dorothy C. Green � Secretary to the City Council � - Approved : � i � ; � � � I . � I � � � � ; � .� � �� , � _ � Willaim J. Nee Mayor � � � i , 1 i I � 1 i � � I i � I I , � � � � � � � I � � : � � i ; , . _ !_ i � � MrMO T0: DEPARTMENT HEAQS Following are the "ACTIONS NEEDED. �Please have your answers back in the � City Manager's office by Wednesday Noon, December 29, 1976. Thank you. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL — REGULAR MEETING — DECEMBER 20, 1976 — 7:30 P, M, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA�dCE; ROLL CALL: _ . , � A11 Present APPROVAL OF MINUT�S: I' � REGULAR MEETiNG OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 Minutes amended � CITY MANAGER ACTION NEEDED: Correct minutes as amended. �INEERING � ' ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Item added regarding "Consideration of One-Way Designation of Lucia Lane" OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: �CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA — 15 MIIVUTES) OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST L�S� #7G—IZ, BY DICK GREGOR; LOCATED ON ��RD AND 73z AvENUES N,E, �TABLED 12/6/76), , . , , , , . . , . . Lot Split approved ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council action ,,,,1-1C i� � � � ,ENGINEERINu � �1 i � � 'ENGINEERING � I � E�INEERING t C � � REGULAR MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1976 PAGE 2 NEW BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR STREET AND ALLEY VACATION REQUEST SAV #76-06, BY ROTTLUND COMPANY, INC� TO VACATE ELY CIRCLE, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN RUTH STREET AND EAST RIVER ROAD, NORTH OF LIBERTY ST� N�E� � 2— Z A Ordinance read on first reading ACTION NEEDED: Put ordinance back on next regular agenda for 2nd reading CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P�$. #76-09, DELEIER ADDITION, BY DONALD �EIER, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE 1500 BLOCK BETWEEN 73RD AVENUE AND ONONDAGA STREET N�E� � � � � . . � � � � Final plat approved with stipulations ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council action . , , , , 3 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF'FINAL PLAT SUSDIVISION P�S� #75-11, �EAL ESTATE Il� ADDITION, BY FRANCIS �� GIRDLER, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE NE QUADF2ANT OF I�694 AND H I GHWAY 65 �� E, . • � � � � � • � � � � � � � � � � Final Plat approved ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council action ,,,4-4a �� REGULAR MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1976 PAGE 3 I � � Ef NEERING � j �J E INEERING � � � � E�I_NEERING � � �dEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FIPJAL PLAT SUBDIVISION P�S, #76-10, INNSBRUCK VILLAG�S SECOND ADDITION, BY DARREL A� FARR DEVELOPMENT CORP „ GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF NORTH INNSBRUCK DRIVE AND WEST OF THE BLACK FOREST APARTMENTS � � � � � � � � �� ' ' ' ' ' S Final Plat approved with stipulations ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council action. � CONSIDERATTON OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION p,$� #%6��5, INNSBRUCK iVORTH REPLAT 3RD ADDITION, BY DARREL A� FARR DEVELOPMENT CORP „ GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST BAVARIAfV PASS AND SOUTH OF ME I STER ROAD N , E � � � . � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � . � 6 Final Plat tabled for three months ACTION NEEDED: Bring back for Council action in three months RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIfVG OF DECEMBER 8, 1976, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 7 — 7 V l. �EORGETOWN I�OTEL, 1 NC �, ZOA #76—U6, SbUU I�IAI N STREET N � E � � � � � � � � • � ' ' ' • ' � • • � & 7TI PIANNIRG OMM. REGOMMEN�ATION; APPROVE �nilN _ i l ACT ION r�EQU 1 RED : SET PUBLI C� HEAR I NG Public Hearing set for January 10 ACTION NEEDED: Make necessary arrangements for Public Hearing � � 1 , � � . REGULAR MEETING, DECEI�BER 20, 1976 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) iPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CONTINUED) 2� R�BERT SCHROER, ZOA #76-0�, BETWEEN %%TH AND 79TN AVE� N�E. ON EAST SIDE OF RANCHER�S RD. PIANNING COMM� RECOMMENDATI01�: APPROVE COUNCIL ACTIDN REQUIRED: SET PUBLIC HEARING � � 7I .- 7N & 7U Public Hearing set for January 10 EN NEERING ACTION NEEDED: Make necessary arrangements for Public Hearing , , �� i ' � � ENGINEERING � i 1 3, ROBERT SCHROER, L,S, #76-11, 7875 aND 7895 RANCHERS ROAD N � E � � � � � � � � , . � � , � , � 7N - 70 & 7U PLANNING COMM, RECOMMEN ATION: APPROVE COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: NONE AT THIS TIME, CONSIDER WITH REZONING REQUEST NO ACTION NEEDED • 4� CITY OF FR'IDLEY, SAV #76-0%, ROAD EASEMENT ON TALMADGE LANE AND �STH WAY� � . � . � � . . � � �JANNiNG COMM� RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE �OUi�G L AGTION REQ.�fIRED: SET PUBLIC �iEARING Public Hearing set for January 10 ACTION NEEDED: f�lake necessary arrangments for Public Hearing. 70&7V PAGE 4 � � , � N EERING � � � PO CE i 1 , FINANCE � � REGULAR MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1976 NEW BUSINESS CCONTINUED) PAGE 5 RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CATV COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER Z, 1976, , . . , , , . , , � . � � � . � � � . ' � - � B 1� TOUR OF EARTH SATELLITE FACILITIES �MONTICELLO AREA) � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � � . � . . � 8 6 Minutes received. A saturday will be set up for tour ACTION NEEDED: Please checkc.with the company to see what Saturday next month would be convenient for them for this tour. Let the City Manager know and he will check with the City Council. �ONSIDERATION OF APPROVING MAPSI CoNTRac-r FoR 1977 ��- y� Contract approved ACTION NEEDED: See that contract is executed. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGING THE 1� _ l� N 19�C BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND� �� ' Resolution #122-1976 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized , f�INEERING T � CONSIDERATIO�! OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FOR ENGINEERING AND TECHf�ICAL SERVICES FOR 1977� � � � � � � � � ' ' ' ' Resolution #123-1976 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized ,,,11-11C � ' � REGULAR MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1976 PAGE�6 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED} ,, RECEIVING QETITION N0. 25-1976 IN FAVOR OF IMPROVEMENT AND PETITION N0� 26-19�6 OPPOSED TO IMPROVEMENT -- '�, ' DELLWOOD DRIVE AND �. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FIfVAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST, 1977-1 aNn ' � S 9 - T � 1 77 2, ADDENDUM #1 � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Petitions received. Resolution #124-1976 adopted E INEERING ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized . , . 1Z -12 F � CONSIDERATTOfV OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR A STREET SWEEPER � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 13 - 13 A Resolution #125-1976 adopted E INEERING ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with Purchasing to advertise for bids � �` CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING '� THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PART OF Lo-r 49, PARCEL Z3OO, AUDITOR`S SUB� #9Z, AND OUTLOT B, INNSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION AND APPORTIONING INTO INNSBRUCK VILLAGES� Resolution #126-1976 adopted ��F NCE ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authori2ed � � � ' I ' , , 14 - 14 A � 1 � � � 'Ii NCE � ' ;I� _MANAGER � , FI NCE . � F NCE ' F�ANCE � ' REGULAR MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1y76 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) PAGE 7 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS OIV PARCEL 4860, SECTION 14 AND APPORTIONING INTO ALICE WALL aDDITION� � . � � + � � � � � • � � � � � � � � � 15 - 15 B Resolution #127�1976 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized . RECEIVING RESIGNATIOIV -- DEfViVIS L.� SCHNEIDER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION� � � � � . � � � � � � � , 16 Resignation received ACTION NEEDED: Put appointment sheet on next agenda �LATMS � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � . � � � � � 17 Approved ACTION NEEDED: Pay claims ESTIMATES � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Ig - 18 B Approved ACTION NEEDED: Pay estimates LICENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1� - 19 B Approved ACTIQN NEEDED: Issue ]icenses � I' REGULAR MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1976 PAGE 8 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) RECEIVING REPORT ON COMPENSATION PLAN FOR GRADED , EMPLOYEES � . � . � � � � � � � � � � . � � � . � � � � � � � � ZO Received and Goncurred iI MANAGER ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with implementing the new plan for 1977 ADJOURti`J : � 1 1 � . �' � r i , FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING , P��ASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS ANQ ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: December 20, 1976 'N�E ADpRESS _ ITEM NUMBER -- =aa=sa�_c=oa=a^c==�aaoa=oa=cx=====-------=--==c.-.o_=a�=s=:a.:===a=aa�==a=a=ao=c=-a=mco===a^=� 7.2 8� � a� m sS4 � a s�- co _. � �, ' O� _ \ '" •� �1.� � [Z' /'1 � l�� Ill�� 1��11 w�� 0 e ' �. . _ . • . . _ . _. .. -. - . �.----- - --.. 210 �' ? � ' . i i ' ' . � 1 ' i ' � � . I ' � ' � ' I � ' I ' i ' I THE MINUTES OF 7HE REGULAR MEETINf, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUPICIL OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 The Regular Meetin� of the Fridley City Council of December 6, 1976 was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor P�ee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and the audience in sayinn the Pledne of Allegiance to the Flaq. ROLL CALl.: MEP16ERS PRESEtdT: Councilman Fitzpatrick,Councilman Starwalt, Councilman Hamernak, Councilwoman Kukowski, and tlayor �Jee. MEMBERS ABSENT: rJone APPROVAL OF P4INUTES: • PUBLIC HEARING MEETI�IG OF NOVEtdBER 8, 1976: P•10TION by Councilwoman Kukowski to approve the minutes of the Public Hearin� Pleetina of the Fridley City Council of November 8, 1976, as submitted. Seconded by Council- man Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all votinc� aye, P1ayor Plee declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR 41EETIP�G OF NOVEMBER 15, 1976: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the minutes of the Re�ular °?eetinq of the Fridley City Council of Plovember 15, 1976, as submitted. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, aTl voting aye, F•1ayor t�ee deciared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTIOP� OF AGEP�DA: MOTIOP! by Councilman Hamernik to ado�t the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Starvialt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Playor Nee declar•ed the motion carried unanimousl,y. OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF A REOUEST FOR VARIAPICES TO ALLOW A FRONT YARD S�dIP1P•1ING POOL BY R08ERT TOP1CZAK, 949 OVER ON D IVE N.E. TABLED 10/18/76 : MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to deny the request for the variance as recommended by the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilvioman Kul<owski. U�on a voice vote, ali voting aye, �tayor Plee declared the motion carried unanimously. ORDIP�A�dCE N0. 626 - REZONING REOUEST, ZOP�IAI(; ORDINANCE APIEPJDh1EP�T ZOA #76-04, C,ORDON SPE�dSOPd, T R ZOPlE FROf'4 R-1 TO R-3; 6500 2PdD STREET N.E.: MOTIOf! by Councilman Hamernik to waive the second reading of Ordinance Flo. 626 and adopt it on the second reading, and publish. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all votin� aye, Playor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ORDIP�ANCE h;0. 627 - REZONIPlG REQUEST, ZOMIPIC ORDINANCE AMEND�tE�lT ZOA #76-03 BY EVERT � CONSIDERATION Of APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BET41EE�1 THE CITY OF FRIDLEY APlD EVERT SWANSON A��D ` CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAI OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISIOPI P.S. #76-08, CENTf�IL TOWPJHOUSE ADDITION, BY• EVERT SWAfJ50N • RND CONSIDERATIOP! OF TOLIPIHOUSE DEVELOPMENT PLANS, T#76-03, BY EVERT SWA��SON AND � i i� � ` i ; � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINC OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 . 211 � PAGE 2 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN AREA VARIANCE 70 ALL041 A TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPFIENT ON 3 CRES OF L ND INSTEAD OF 5 ACR S: Mr. Dick Sobiech, Public Works Director, proceeded to �o throuah the items in the Agreement. Also, at the last meetinn wherein the first reading of the ordinance for rezoning was adopted, the Administration had prepared a rezoninq developmental agree- ment outlining certain requirements of the developer. At that time, the developer had not received the a�reement, however, in the past few weeks they have been able to get together and review the a�reement. The items in the developmental agreement�were put together from comments received at the public hearinq before the Plannina Commission and the City Council. ' Mr. Sobiech then be�an with Item �l of the Aqreement which item indicated that the . developer feels that the townhouse development is feasible for a thirty-six (36) unit development. This is in regards to the variance request which was recommended for i approval by the Appeals Commission. The variance recorrmended minimum area for town- � house development from five acres down to three acres. The main intent of that require- � ment is the feasibility of a homeowners association in conjunction with the townhouse proposal. � � ., i i ; � � Item #2 of the Agreement is regarding the rezoning wherein there is concern from the abutting property ovmers in that once the property is rezoned to R-3, that perhaps an apartment buiding or other uses could be developed instead of the intended townhouse development. However, in the Agreement it is specified that the developer is restricted to developing a thirty-six unit townhouse development and that multiple dwellinqs and multiple dwelling complexes, hotels, apartment hotels, motels, lodc�inc� and boardinq houses, will not be permitted on the property unless the developer comes before the City Council and explains a change in his plans. Item #3 of the Agreement provides for the intention of the owner to develop the town- houses to be owner-occupied in conformance with the Homeowners Association by-laws. Item #4 of the Agreement is a requirement of the City Platinq Ordinance. Initially the developer was requested to pay a certain amount of the land for park dedication and some recreational facilities that are normally associated with townhouse development. In lieu of this, the developer has proposed to construct some recreational facilities in the area of a swimming poal; and he has indicated that the swimmin� pool will be in lieu of the land dedication and will be to the value of the land dedication and provide the recreational facilities as has been allowed other townhouse developments. Item #5 regarding the roadway easement remains the same. Item #6 remains the same and will be submitted for review. Item #7--there was input from the people that they would like to see a fence constructed along the existing residential properties adjacent to the townhouse structure. The developer has agreed to install a wood screen fence along the properties, but it would be constructed upon completion of the townhouse structure and at the time the landscaping is being placed. Item #8 was amended to remove the sixth line as it was redundant in that he.already signed an agreement. Mr. Sobiech further stated that the developer's attorney has been in contact with the City Attorney. Councilman Fitzpatrick commented in regard to the swimmincr pool in that it did not seem to him that it was goinq to provide for the recreational needs of the area. It will provide only one need of the area and even thouah the value would be equal, it still does not serve the purpose intended. The swimmin� pool is not aoing to be available to the park area but only to the property owners directly. Councilman Starwalt stated that he agreed with Councilman Fitzpatrick and asked the architect to provide some information reqardinq the.pool. � � � � � I ; I 'r _ _ � � _ _ —_ _- . _�_ _ _ _ _. ._.,. _ _ -�. - - — - _ 212 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEPI6ER 6, 1976 PAGE 3 Mr. A1 Hoffineyer, Architect, stated that the pool would be 20' x 40' and that Mr. Sobiech had the plans (which he then presented to the Council). Mr. Sobiech stated that the pool would be generally located relatively in the center of the complex and that it could be used by the residents. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that his objection had nothinn to do with the details of the pool but simply that the �ool is only one aspect of recreation and that it does not serve the purpose in mind--the 10% land dedication. Councilman Starwalt then asked Mr. Swanson, owner, if perhaps the pool wa5 an over- sight or was it something that he may have come around to realize as an overall enhancement of the development. Mr. Swanson responded that the pool was never mentioned until the end of all the meetings and that he never realized that anything like this would be asked. In other words, he felt this should have been told to him when he started the proceedin�s. Councilman Starwalt stated that if Mr. Swanson wishes to build a pool no one would stop him; however, the Council would require that he provide reasonable internal facilities as well. Mr. Virgil Herrick, City Attorney, stated that the internal facilities would be in lieu of the additional $6,000 cash which was proposed in the ori�inal agreement. Mr. Swanson and Mr. Hoffineyer stated that this was agreeable. Regarding the screen fence, Mayar Nee stated that he had a problem with this in that the people expect it. Councilman Starwalt then asked Mr. Hoffineyer to elaborate on this. Mr. Hoffineyer responded that the fence will be installed in stages. As the buildings are completed when they do the landscapin4, the fence will be put up. If the fence is put up ahead of time, there is the possibility of heavy equipment knocking it down. Mayor Nee suggested that he thou�ht it would be a good idea to put the fence up ahead of time to protect the residents and, of course, their children. Council- man Starwalt then commented that in conversations with some of the neighbors, it is desirable that it be ultimately fenced; however, he was of the impression that they were agreeable to it being put up in stages. Councilman Starwalt then asked what the total time span would be for the total construction of the thirty-six units and Mr. Hoffineyer responded that they do not anticipate it to be more than a year. A resi�d�nt stated that he would accept this as long as he was assured there would be a fence. Councilman Starwalt assured him there would be a fence. Councilman Starwalt then asked P1r. Hoffineyer to give a brief explanation of how he intends to proceed. Mr. Hoffineyer then showed the Council a plan of the different states. Mr. Dennis Schneider stated that he was quite concerned in that it was his recollection from the public hearing that the ori�inal suggestion was that they start at stage 6 and work backwards, and the compromise that he understood was that the fence would go in so the people directly to the north, who are presently zoned R-1, would not be burdened with the usual problems of construction or possible trespassing problems. Mr. Michael Virnig, 1365 73rd AVenue N.E., stated that in terms of stages, he would be agreeable to the fence being put in accordingly. Mr. Swanson suggested that perhaps he could get together with the resident and �ir. Virnig and discuss this amicably. Mr. Sobiech then showed the Council the landscapina plan as discussed at the public hearing which plan indicated that the wood screen fence would proceed along the extremities of the development as it abutts the sin�le family residential properties. j MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to amend Para�raph IV of the Aryreement to require $4,730 ' � as payment under the required ordinances and that the swimmin� pool or other suitable internal amenities as approved by the Staff, be provided. Seconded by Councilman ' Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor P�ee declared the motion carried unanimously. ' C� ' Mr. Nasim Qureshi, City Manager, then asked P1r. Hoffineyer if he could qive a figure of what the value of the townhouses will be and he replied $n0,000 to �60,000. ' �_ ` - _ - - -- — — -,- -- ,. ,� ; � i 213 i REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 PAGE 4 M(1TION by Councilman Starwalt to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 627 and adopt it on the second reading and withhold publication until the agreements have been executed. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Starwait io approve the area variance to a11ow a townhouse development on 3 acres of land instead of 5 acres. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the final plat subdivision P.S. #76-08. Seconded by Councilwanan Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee suggested that consideration of the townhouse development plans, T#76-03 be tabled so that there would be more time to review the plans. Mr. Sobiech stated that the tablina of this would not hold anything up and that this would enable them to see the plans that the building inspection people would have to review before actual construction begins. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to table the consideration of the townhouse development plans and bring it back when they are ready. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.� NEW BUSINESS: RESOLUTION No. 1i8-1976 - GIVING PRE'LIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT UPdDER THE MUNICIPAL AND Mr. Paul Wheeler, Corporate Vice President of Safetran Systems Corporation and Vice President/General Mananer of the Electrical Mechanical Division, was present and stated that the Board of Direciors has authorized the expansion of an additionai �2,000 sq. ft. of the existing facility in Fridley. 4Jith the addition of 72,000 sq. ft., it is their intent to increase the number of people who are employed there. Fortunately, according to Mr. Wheeler, the business is �trowinc� and thereby necessitating a need to expand. Mr. tJheeler then mentioned the names of several qentlemen who were also present: Mr. Purol, Corporate Vice President, Finance, from Louisville, Kentucky; Mr. Dan Mills, J.C. Bradford & Co., from Nashville, Tennessee; Mr. Harry Mitchell, P1ani Manager, Fridley; and Mr. Fred Salmon; Division E�ontroller, Fridiey. The contractor they are using is Magney Construction Company. Mr. Pierce, 2135 24th Avenue North, Plymouth, was present to represent them. Mr. Lynn Endorf from Dorsey Owens was also present. Mr. Dan Mills, J.C. Bradford & Co. then spoke about his or�anization and stated that they were quite honored when Safetran Systems contacted them to be the underwriters on the issuance. He further stated that his or�anization is also aware of what a sound and financially strong company Safetran Systems is. At the present time, his company is planning on a million and a half dollar issue to be retired over fifteen years. Mr. Mills also stated that how payment will be made has not been decided as this is usually dictated by the market. However, at the present time, he believed it would be a level debt--a level principal and interest payment. This will necessitate a figure of approximately $150,000 per year. Mr. Lynn Endorf, with Dorsey Owens, was then asked to comment on the legal aspects of the issue. Mr. Endorf stated that he did not have much more to add, only that he wanted to emphasize that they are seeking preliminary approval which will give the company an indication that the Council is looking with favor upon the project. Also, that the company can go ahead and take the necessary steps to find somebody to purchase these bonds with the understanding that if the purchaser defaults, the Council will go ahead and issue the bond. Mr. Endorf then commented that Mr. Marvin Brunsell, Finance Director, has copies of the application to the State Department of Economic Development with information provided by the Company. He proceeded to distribute this to the Council. Mr. Brunsell mede reference to Page 2 which qives a breakdown of the estimated costs in the bond issue and also a brief description of the bond issue. , l i i i � � 1 i_ _ � _ ___. _ _ ._ _.,_____ -- - ---- — _ � � ' ' , . � ' � LJ � ' ' � ' � 214 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETIN6 OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 PA6E 5 � Mayor Nee then asked Mr. Milis about a balloon at the end or at least not address the � principal for the first seven years, as to that not being the intent and Mr. Mills j responded that it was not. Mayor Nee stated that the Council liked the idea of the , mortgage insurance. Mr. Mills stated that he would like to require that the Council not recommend mortgage insurance since the financial stability of the company is sound I and with the size of Safetran, he believed it was not necessary. � Councilman Starwalt then made reference to the letter which he was just handed, , regarding the cost items--construction about a million dollars, site improve- , � ments -$86,000, new heating system for existing building abou� a third of a million dollars, and asked who could elaborate on this item. IMr. Paul Wheeler stated that, presently, they have natural qas and he was very � concerned about the operation of fuel and in exploring this, he has not received any encouragement as to natural gas. What will be in 1980, he did not know; and therefore, this leads to electric heating which would be for the new addition. So instead'of paying out this money for just a portion of the time beinq which is 72,000 sq. ft. as compared to the existing facility of somethinq over 125,000 sq. ft., now is the time ' to act on•it. Mr. Wheeler further added that he did have another consultant give him a second opinion as to the theory of the heating system and the report was favorable. � Councilman Starwalt said this pertains to only heating equipment, and asked if anything else would be popping up. Mr. Brunsell responded there was nothing else that he was aware of. � Mr. Wheeler reaffirmed this with a definite no. Mr. Wheeler also added that it will � be installed in such a way that solar panels can be added to it. He further comnented that he had plans (which he proceeded to show to the Council) of the proposed treat- � ment of the frontage which he believed would be pleasing to the City as is the present facility's frontage. � _. , Mayor Nee asked Paul Gustafson from the Sun Newspaper if he had any questions, and he did not. Councilman Fitzpatrick questioned that this is almost a 50q or more increase in area additionally, and Mr. Wheeler responded that it is. Mr. Qureshi stated that at present it is certainly one of the nicest maintained buildings in the City and an expansion of the same caliber would be a good addition to that area. Mayor Nee stated that he too was enthusiastic and always thought the Company was a good company. � Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that the Council has been prepared for sometime to act favorably upon this concept of municipal bond issues. He further stated that a . I letter received this evening from J.C. Bradford � Co. asked the Council, at this I point, to simply indicate a favorable reception of such a proposal and he was prepared i to move that in whatever form it would have to take. Mr. Nerrick then stated that the Council at this time was being asked to approve the preliminary application which will advise the State Department of Economic Develop- ment that there has been a preliminary discussion and that the Council has approved the submission of the application to the State. He further stated that contained in the Memorandum of Agreement in item four of General Provision, is a statement to the effect that if the final details of the issue are not ac�reed upon within a twelve month period or such other date as the company and the City agree upon, that the approval and the issue shall be considered void. Mr. Endorf stated that although the Council may think that there is a lot of documenta- tion simply for preliminary approval of the project, one of their major concerns is establishing, in effect; a benchmark for the Inter.nal Revenue Service. Mayor Nee then sumnarized the resolution in order to provide a basis for the waiver of the reading.• Mr. Qureshi then stated that extra copies were available. � Mr. Herrick also pointed out that this is not co mnittinc� the full faith and credit � of the City as far as the bonds are concerned. They are strictly revenue bonds and rely on the revenue of the company to retire the bonds and not the tax values within � the City of Fridley. Mayor Nee further stated that there is also a provision in this I � f— - - ____ . _____�__ _ __ _ . __._. . _. _.._ _____ _ ._._ _ _ � -- ' 1 ► , � ( � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Of DECEMBER 6, 1976 t• J , i � � � ;_ _.. _ .._ , , Z�� . 1 � PAGE 6 � that to finance these proceedings, the canpany deposits to the City $5,000 to be called on'for the cost of the City's work on it and the balance wouid be reversible. Therefore, the City would be proceeding at no cost to the public. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 118-1976. Seconded by Counciiwortnn Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, PTayor Nee deciared the motion carried unanimously. � RECEIVING THE MINUTES QF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINr, OF NOVEMBER 17, 1976: I . DICK GRE60R, L S. #,76-12; LOCATED ON 73RD AND 73%Z AVENUE: Mr. Sobiech stated that this is a request for a lot split which lot split request comes at a time when next Monday eveninq, December 13, 1976, there will be a hearing on a proposed plat of Lot 32. The Planning Commission has heard the request and did recommend approval with a stipulation. Mr. Sobiech thought Mr. Gregor was present, but he was not. Mr. Qureshi stated that since Lot 32 was coming up next Monday evening, perhaps the whole thing could be considered at that time. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to table the matter until the Public Hearing Meeting � of December 13, 1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousTy. UNION 76 SP #75-28, 5695 HACKMANN AVENUE: Mr. Sobiech stated that this was a review or renewal of a speciat use permit that was originally approved at the April 5, 1976 Council Meetin4. One of the stipulations of the special use permit approval together with the rezonin4 at that t�me was that there be redevelopment of the property, and prior to the development of that property, the petitioner come again and allow review of the special use permit. Mr. Sobiech stated that Mr. Glenn Hubbard was present. He further pointed out that what is anticipated is a change in concept to what was oringally there. The concept being a self-service attendant only type situation. He further stated that the Union Oil people did take into account the various traffic patterns in the area and came up with a scheme which would allow a one-way situation through self-service. There was some concern, however, about the nature of the construction of the attendant building. Mr. Qureshi then asked what was proposed for the property to the east and Mr. Sobiech stated that it is an all open area and it is landscaped. Mr. Qureshi stated that he believed a more sturdier type of fencinq would be necessary for this type of operation along the east side. Mr. Sobiech asked P1r. Hubbard if he had any objection to redwood fencing. h1r. Hubbard asked how far back ii would go. Mr. Sobiech responded that it would probably begin at the front lot line of the adjacent dwelling and tie into the proposed fence on the south side. Mr. Qureshi suggested a chain link fence with wood strips in it. This would be something that would last and be maintenance free. He then asked Mr. Hubbard about his plans for the property to the south of this. Ne sugqested perhaps making it more pleasing to look at; for example, puttinn in some seed so it would look better than it does. ( MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the special use permit with the stipulation f that'the appropriate fence can be worked out with Staff. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votinn aye, P1ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 1976: YOUTH CENTER ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION: Nir. Ned SiorTa stated that after reading what the lawyer had written, he did not i see any significant changes, and that he would like to see it passed. � ' � � . . � _ _ _ � _ ___.__ , __ � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ :_.� ._ � l � � I I � � � ' � , r _�_ '� ' , 216 RE6ULAR COUNCIL PIEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 Mayor Nee stated that he had done a great deal of work. PAGE 7 Councilwoman Kukowski then proceeded to thank Mr. Herrick for going over the by-laws. � MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive and concur with the Articles of Incorporation as submitted by the City Attorney. Seconded by Councilman � , Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Herrick stated that he looked at the Articles as drawn and made some revisions ' . ; as far as form and some revision as far as organization but he did not try to change I the substance in the version that had been adopted. ' • ' �� ' � , ' • ' APPEALS CONU4ISSION PIEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1976: PERKTNS CAKE & STEAK; 7520 UNIVERSITY AVENUE: Mr. Sobaech stated that this is a request to increase the area of the proposed sign for the Perkins Cake & Steak house. A variance is needed to allow the oval shape in the area of 80 to 80%2 sq, ft. as opposed to the orininal request for 119 sq. ft. The Appeals Commission did recommend approval. tdr. Sobiech asked if the representative fran Perkins had the photos with him and he responded he did not. Mr. Sobiech stated that he had an opportunity to drive by the sign in Anoka and it is quite attractive. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the•recommendation of the Appeals Comnission and approve the si�n variance. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. COMMUNITY DEVELOP�4ENT CONU1ISSIOPI D1EETIt!(; OF P�OVEMBER 9, 1976: BIKEWAY/WALKWAY PLAN: Mr. Sobiech stated that the bikeway/walkway project beqan as a pilot program which would eventually ease into the bikeway/walkway system. In order to see if the system would work for the City of Fridley, a bikeway/walkway olan was adopted designating certain bike paths, lanes and routes and it was then broken down into various stages in order to implement the system. Mr. Sobiech further stated that it was recommended that they proceed on the pilot basis for certain central routes to get a feel of the implementation program as to how far they should proceed and they would then continue to �o on to the next necessary stage. He also stated that another thing that was tried was to elicit as much funding as possible from other sources and to that end, several applications have been made for grants for the bikeway/walkway system; and they received an indication they would receive approximately $5,000. Mr. Sobiech continued stating that what was being focused on as far as the grants are concerned is the area of the bike paths, being oft-street areas which wauld be more expensive. The City was tryinq to provide the signinq and the stripping as far as its maintenance program and they will be working with the County to get started on the program. I As far as the miles of bike paths, it was hoped that they can acquire funding � which would allow this. Regarding the stripping, Mr. Sobiech pointed out that , � there have been quite a few discussions with the County regarding what they wanted as far as federal requirements. They have a shoulder stripping program, however, I a decision was reached in what they believed was good for the City and certain � distortions of the stripping were eliminated; and hopefully it is now to the � ; point that it is recognizable as a bikeway system. The County piaced the signs and the City the stencils. From indications received, Mr. Sobiech stated that ' this has worked very.well on county roads. There are some problems, however, at , the intersections which they are aware of and are working on. ' ` � , , � , ( _ _ �.. _. � � .. _ C_. __ -- —� - --- -- - — - - - --- -- --- l f REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1P76 ' 2�7 , PAGE 8 I Mr. Sobiech further stated that toaether with the County stripping and the City ! strippina, they have proceeded with the si�nina on the County roadways which amounted to aporoximately 32 on County roads and 28 on the City system. The total amount of monies expended was approximately 33,600 by the County and $2,200 by the City for the sions and striopina. The sinninn, however, on the County system is not to the extent that they would like to see. There is presently signing which says, "no drivinn on the shoulders--bicycles oermitted." This aaain was in discussion with the County where their federal fundino for�the stripping would have been jeopardized if in fact it had actuall,y been desianated as a bikeway. Mr. Sobiech stated that he believed they are proceedin�, however, quite a bit of work remains to be done. He pointed out that at present, they do know as far as the system itself, the signing and strippinc�, additional arrows are needed to help direct. They now see bicyclists on the wrono side of the street. Additionally, beginninn and endinc� sinns will be needed. Therefore, in 1977 they will proceed with additional si�ns to help clarify the area, together with additional applications for fundinq of the bicycle paths so they do not'have to utilize the Fridle,y taxpayers money. Thev also hope to proceed in 1977 with additional routes and lanes. Mr. Sobiech then stated that one of the oi:her concerns of the Community Develop- ment Corrrnission was the enforcement pro�ram and,the bikeway/walkway ordinance. , In early summer or late sprinq, an original bikeway/walkwa,y ordinance was brought before the Council, however, the leaislature then adopted some of their own rules and regulations and there were some �inconsistencies between the proposed ordinance and the one lec�islated by the State of P1innesota. At present, it is � in the Police Department and they anticipate by the end of January, the draft i will be completed and hopefully the ordinance adopted for prooer enforcement by next season. ,,• � � � � I i � Mr. Sobiech further stated that another item that was brouaht up was the educational program and at this point, they must have an ordinance in order to know exactly what to inform the people. At the school aae level, they do have an extensive educational program reqardinq aicycles and bicycle use; but as far as a program for just a general resident, that has not come up as yet. They anticipate informing the aeneral public by the use of fliers, newsl.etters, and seminars at the City Hall. In summary, Mr. Sobiech stated that at the Staff level, he believed the pilot program has been successful and will continue to have a system to be utilized by the residents. He added that all the sinninc� and stripping proposed for 1977 was put into the maintenance budnet. Mr. Dennis Schneider then thanked P�r. Sobiech for his presentation and stated that the intent in the motion in the Community Development Commission's minutes did not address so much of the physical aspects. It was primarily focused at the � ordinance and at the cost of enforcement until the ordinance is written. The areas of discrepancy are primarily just on the licensinn and at worst, they could ' set aside the license and proceed with the enforcement of educational items and at least get in a portion of the ordinance which would indicate who has the ' right-of-way in the bike lanes or direction of travel or whether kids or adults could ride six abreast or just two abreast, and that is his intent of his motion. ' Mr. 5obiech stated that perhaps they could indicate to the Commission also what � they are doing. Mr. Qureshi stated that as everyone is aware, they are authorized for a small ; � amount of grant monies, however, they have been successful to �et some monies. Hopefully, this item will be brouaht to the Council's attention at the January � conference meetina. He further stated that they will do their part. He believed ' it was a matter of how much monev and how much personnel resource, and how far they want to go. P1r. Schneider works with the Community Oevelopment Commission and will be attending the conference meetinq, and will �ive some insight that certainly would be helpful. Mr. Herrick then stated that the only comment he wanted to make that would probably be helpful in draftin� an ordinance would be to �et some thoughts from the Comnission on what they would like to see in the ordinance with the under- standinq that the City does not have complete discretion in this area. He further stated that if there are some thou4hts from the Commission as to what they would like to see put into the ordinance as far as rules and enforcements, etc., it would be helpful to him and P1r. Jim Hill to have them sometime prior to the end of January. � , . 218 � � � ' ' � • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECETI6ER 6, 1976 - - -- � � ' PAGE 9 ' Mr. Sobiech stated that the Cortmission did provide necanmendations in the bike- way/walkway plan. F�r. Sobiech stated that the only action necessary was to receive the minutes MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Plannina Commission Meeting of November 17, 1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Playor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE REVISED AND APPROVED SPECIAL CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF UGUST 4, 1976: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the minutes of the Charter Commission Meeting of August 4, 1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CABLE TELEVISION PIEETIPlG OF NOVEMBER 18, 1976: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Meeting of November 18, 1976. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FUNDING FROM FRIDLEY 49'ERS: � Mr. Ed Dunn stated that they are starting to aet some retailers involved with the i fundin� portion for the 49'ers. There are a number of other activities listed which he believed will be self-sustainina. He further pointed out that there are sometimes � unexpected expenses which come up, and he has made recommendations to the Finance ' Committee that they do not qet into the cup and cookbook business as the pains are still being felt from that of the Bicentennial. There are still 400 cups to be sold and approximately 350 cookbooks. He did not believe these would ever be sold � and would probably be used as give-away items. ' �J ' 1� ' , , ' Mayor Nee asked Mr. Dunn how the budqet compared with last year. �1r. Dunn replied that last year he estimated $9,400 had been spent. Reqardin� the parades, this year they will decide on the units they have in the parade and more or less tell them what they are going to qive to them. After talkina to the schools in the area, they have now found out what their needs are and people do not realize that every school in the ' area charges to be in the parade. The Fridley Hi�h School, for instance, charges $150; the Junior Hinh School charges $125; and the Sprin� Lake Park Hiah School charges $150. He further pointed out that in 1977 they are noing to scrutinize each unit more carefully � and decide which unit will give their best. Mayor Nee asked what was put in last year. Mr. Dunn stated that they did not request any money for the parade. They requested $4,500 for the entire Bicentennial and part of that money t•�ent to the town meetin� which was held in February. He further mentioned that the button sales around town are extremely successful and they have $2,400 more to apply toward the budnei. The deficit was $1,500 and they have reduced it to $1,000. Councilman Starwalt questioned the fact that the local school bands have to be paid to participate in the parades. Mr. Dunn stated that this is correct, and that is the policy of the schools. However, they plan to talk to more bands in the outlying areas who have proved to charge a reasonable rate for what's involved. He did mention that the Fridley State Bank has sponsored the Fridley Senior Hi�h Band for two years, and they agreed to sponsor them a�ain this year. Mr. Qureshi stated that if the Council would be inclined to approve the request, they could perhaps r�ay for some of the supplies needed for the celebration up to $4,000. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Dunn if that was aareeable and he responded that it would be fine. • MOTION by Councilman Namernik to approve the request for fundina for the Fridley 49'ers up to a maximum of $4,000. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � I , i � i I � i I -- --� 21� REGUl.AR COUNCI! MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 PAGE i0 � � ' Mr, Dunn then asked the Council about their feelin�s in regard to a public forum or town � ' meeting in 1977. He further commented that they held some meetings on this and sane � people believed it was a good idea and some believed it was a waste of time. Mr. Dunn � ' felt it was a good idea as across the country, Fridley had the number one town meeting. ! They had over 600 participants. Ne thought, perhaps, the name could be changed from ` a town meeting to a public forum. I E � Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if it had been so successful, why are those objecting. ' Mr. Dunn stated that they thought it was too much work. • Councilwoman Kukowski asked Mr. Dunn what point of involvement he expected from the , City Council. Mr. Dunn stated that at present, he was just lookinq for someone to give him a go sign. Councilman Starwalt a.sked what the source of funding was. Mr. Dunn replied that last year the funding for the town meetinas cost approximately $1,600 of which the State of Minnesota paid a portion. Mayor Nee then asked if Mr. Dunn had any plans for a clean-up. Mr. Dunn stated that he does. He also stated that Mr. Jerry Boardman, City Planner, was present at their board meetinq and spent some time with the board and it was decided that Mr. Mark Haggerty and Mr. Eoardman would work out a proqram. Mr. Dunn stated that he plans on recognizing approximateTy 25 businesses that have done an outstanding job in � beautification this year. He further stated that there was discussion about developing a date sometime next Spring when they would have a community clean-up day and encourage not only the businesses but everyone to �et out and clean up their yards. Some of the ideas were that they go to the schools and see if they could have the "old earth day" where everyone gets out and the kids go around and have a clean-up during the day and have drop-off points i.e., P9cDonalds, etc. The kids in turn get free hamburgers, milk shakes, etc. He further believed there are a lot of ways to go on this and really make it a big day. Mayor Nee asked if there was a way the Council could work with him on this. Mr. Dunn replied that he though basically through the Staff. As stated earlier, Mr. Haggerty and Mr. Boardman were going to pursue this. Mr. Qureshi stated that they would certainly work with Mr. Dunn. RESOLUTION N0. 119-1976 - NAMING THAT PART OF ALDEN :+IAY IMME'DIATELY NORTH OF 71Z WAY TO ALDEN CIRCLE: Mr. Sobiech stated that his request was received'at the final assessment hearinq and there was some difficulty in locatinq their residences and the post office was having problems. Mayor Nee asked if everyone has been advised and Mr. Sobiech responded they have been, MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution PJo. 119-1976. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. , RESOLUTION N0. 120-1976 - ACCEPTING THE DEED Of EASEPIENT Af,REEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE ; EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY FOR THE IMPROVEMEPJT OF OSBORNE WAY, 75TH WAY AND ALDEN WAY: � MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 120-1976. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carrie�! unanimously. i'' CONSIDERA7ION OF APPROVAL OF JOI�dT I.ISE PENTAL AGREEf�ENT #191 FC1R 1977 WITH ";ETROPOLITAN ; WASTE COtJTROL C PM4ISSION D1WCC : . � Mr. Sobiech stated that this was an interceptor agreement that they have with the � Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and have had since its institution, and it allows , for a compensation to the City for maintaining a certain interceptor in the City that was not taken over by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Ne further stated ; that they have reviewed their costs and the compensation noted in the agreement was still adequate. He also pointed out that if they do gq over what is actually paid for, they are reimbur5ed. � ;_ MOTION by Councilman Stark�alt to approve the agreement with the MetropoTitan Waste Control Commission. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Sobiech stated that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission is interested in using I i I r�.� --- _.._ _....____ _ � . ___.__ �__ _ _ __._ _ _ _ _ _ 220 I,' ' ! REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 I � 4 I , ' I ' i � � I i � -1 PAGE 11 a strenqth user discharqe systen and that perhaps is may be appropriate to pass on any information at the conference meeting. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF INTERCEPTOR MAINTENANCE AGREEAtENT #67 WITH METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION MWCC FOR 1977: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to approve the agreement with Metropolitan Waste Cantrol Comnission for 1977. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 121-1976 - ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PIISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND DRIVEWAY APPROACH RECONSTRUCTION CONTRACT: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to adopt Resolution No. 121-1976. Seconded by Council- woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion . carried unanimously. Mr. Sobiech stated that there is a considerable amount of trouble with the contractors not putting in the curb property. Ne believed that they can provide a service in that this is an area where the potential owner of a structure must contract for curbinganyway. He was hopeful in achieving numerous services for the resident plus the City. RECEIVING RESIGNATION - MR. AL OSSENKOP, CATV COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the resi�nation. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. APPOINTMENTS - HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION AND CATV C0�IMISSION: Councilman Starwalt stated that he would like to nominate Mr. Ed Dunn to the Cable TV Commission. Councilman Hamernik nominated Mr. Don Ault to the Human Resources Commission. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to appoint Mr. Ed Dunn to the CATV Commission. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all, voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to appoint Mr. Ned Storla to the Human Resources Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Councilman Hamernik stated that since the resignation of Nancy Lambert, he lost the only representative from his Ward. He further stated that he would like to see representation in Ward I and there should be representation from all Wards. Councilman Starwalt asked Mr. Ned Storla if it would be agreeable to hold back at this time and work with the Teen Center Charter that he is working with. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that Mr. Storla did not nominate himself and he believed that he did not think he should be faced with the choice. Councilwoman Kukowski stated that she would like to see the youth in the community involved. Mr. Storla stated that he felt that working for a community and qivinq time for a community � was more important than having a specific ward representation. Mr. Qureshi stated that there will be more vacancies cominq up. Mayor Nee then stated he knew Mr. Ault and would like to see him appointed to a comnittee in the future. UPON A VOICE VOTE, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. CLAIMS: � t40TI0N by Councilwoman Kukowski to pay Claim No's. 17922 - 18127. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. , � � � i � — -- --- - ---- - --- � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETIIvG OF DECEMBER 6, 1976 2Z1 PAGE 12 � i ; LICENSFS: � , , MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in � the License Clerk's office. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, i all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � RDJOURNMENT: I ' MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adjourn the meetina. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. � Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meetinq of the Fridley City Council of December 6, 1976 adjourned at , 11:05 p.m. As a point of information, Mayor Nee stated that they have decided not to have their conference meeting on the fourth Monday in December. It will be in January. , i ; Respectfully submitted, � Dorothy C. Green Secretary to the City Council ° J; _' Approved: i 1 I � � i t � � -_ _ � William J. Nee Mayor ( I I � - -� � _ _ . _ ._.__ ) , Planning Comrnission t�eeting - November 17, 1976 ' ' IJ ' � ' ' �J ' ' ' ' ' ' � ' ' , Page 17 1 Mrs. Gabel asked where the City stood as far as saying to Burlington orthern that they would like to have this land rezoned commercial and deve ped that way. rir. Boardman said he didn't think the City wanted to tell rlington Narthern they had to rezone this because right away there wou be a legal fight. He said the land was presently zoned industrial pro rty, and Burlington Northern was looking for other possibilities of developme . Mr. Boardman said he had one other question, and aske if the eommission felt that a motel was compatible use to that area if the est of the property North of the motel remained industrial, and if so, why t e table? tirs. Gabel commented that she felt it was spot rezoning unless the w e thing was rezoned. 2Ir. Bergman said he would like to answer that ques iony and stated he was concerned that it be parcelled up in logical planning arcels and the strip between the rezoning request and the railroad. tracks h felt should have been part of the rezoning. Chairperson Harris said that was not sure that the 1•i-2 was compatible with the C-2. Chairperson Haxris said that from s own standpoint, he thought Nir. George's proposal was compatible with the otal area, and he thought that was what they were trying to look at--the to �al area and not just the existing zone.: He stated that perhaps this wou be a progressive type zoning operation, and he hoped it would be a step. . Harris said he didn't know if they needed a comprehensive plan, but d think they should talk to the people from B N L and find out what dire ion they were looking at. He said he also felt they should talk to someo� about the particular flyer r-ir. George had shown ther� which said '�potent'�a7. corrunercial". UPON A VOIGE V�3`E, Harris, Bergman, Langenfeld and Gabel voting aye, Shea voting nay� the mot3.on carried 1� - 1. � Chairpers Harris said he would like B N L or Burlington Northern to come in� to the ty Staff and ask for assistance in deciding what could be done with this arcel. Nlrs. Gabel commented that she thought the point was they had to ok out for the future of the entire city. rir. Boardman suggested to rlr. G rge that he make the initial contact with B N L or Burlington idorthern o meet'with the Planning Corimission on December 8th. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUFST: L.S. �#76-12, 3Y DICK GREGOR: Sp1it the balance of Lot 37.� Auditor's Subdivision 129� into two bu:�lding sites, each 138' x 110' which excepts the West 129 feet of the South � of Lot 31, and excepts the North �, and allows for a 25' road dedication for 73� Avenue. Lots will be addressed on 73rd and 73� Avenue N.E. _ Mr. and Nlrs. Dick Gregor were present. Mr. Boardman explained that this was a lot split request to split the East half of lot 31 in half North and South, and he thought this tiaas in keeping with the area. .lie suggested there be a stipulation that the 25' street dedication occur at this time on ?3 2 Avenue. ' Planning Commission Meeti.ng - November 17, 1976 ' , � Page 12 � a Chairpers�n Harris asked if block 31 was all under one owriership, and rfr. Gregor said he only owned the portion East of the existing.structure. Mr. Boardrnan stated he had been under the impression those were under the sams o��mership, but regardless of that, they would have to have that 25' street der�ication. He said they would have to deal with the owner of the West portion of block 31 individually. - Chairperson Harris asked if the remaining lot sizes would be sufficient, and i�fr. Boardman replied they would have a 92.75 width. He stated the depth r would be approximately 13?�, so the lots.would probably be around 12,000 . square feet. 2�ir. Harris asked if there were any other easements required, � and l�ir. Boardman said there were not. P�1r. Harris asked if Jim Lund hadn't purcha.sed some of that land tax forfeit so the county had a little bit wider right-of-way on 73rd, and I�ir. Boardman replied tha.t was correct. , , C� � , l � � T1r. Langenfeld asked if the lrlest portion of I,ot 31 would be split sor�e time in the future, and Chairperson Harris noted there was a structure in there no�a that sat almost in the middle�of the lot, so he doubted there would be a split. , ;l Chairperson Harris asked Mr. Gregor if he was in agreement with the dedication of the 2�' street easement, and he answered that he 4ras. P70TION by Langenfeld, seconded by Shea, that the Planning Commission reCo:n�-nend to City Council approval of Lot Split Request L.S. #76-12, by Dick Gregor: Split the balance of I,ot 31, Auditor's Subdivision 129, inio �wo builciing sites, each 138� x 110' which excepts the �rJest 129 feet of the South � of Lot 31, and excepts the North �, and allows for a 25' road dedication for 73� Avenue. Lots will be addressed on 73rd and 73� Avenue N.E. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. .. 3• REVIEW OF SPECIAL USE PER.I�4IT SP �r75-28 UNION OIL COriPANY• eguest for a building permit to construct a new service station. ee Planning Commission minutes 12/3/75). Chairperson Harris said that one of the sti had been that when they came in for a build reviewed by the Planning Commission a��iii. �'ions of the Special Use Permit permit request that this be Mr. Boardman informed the Commission that Union Oil was planning a self- , service type concept, and th,e'only building they would have was an attended station. He said they would be taking the present building down,.and there were well-designed landscape areas within the concept itself. Mr. Boardman ' said that the redesign of the intersection there did create some traffic concern within this property, and it looked like they had taken that into consideration.�" � , hirs. Styea asked the size of the cashier station, and t�ir. Boardman i.nformed he�i� was 1!� � x. a' . . 1 . ' � t � o ` � , , ,r � � II� 5,� _.. .�, s _ ._ ; --.. ' � / I / � ��i � r �q 1 �'�, ., t• �-•—=� � E.1' � ,• �,,..., ,: .:, o . .. C r �� .ti•,, /�• �f � /'') � � �'''9� ' �;' :. � Z — �» ovrto7 / ; ti ... i ` . ..... � _._�_.Y. /." _' N � .,..��Ii!__, wi� � ' F,- �._.� �� ° �� : :3 ^ ', �t;2 � � '�� ,.~' . � _ �.L%I,• ' . .�V� JM'Il•t'M i � _ ` " 90 d/S �r�?'•' � �:,� ' �+1 f.�� Q N�� : � ;. u w y; � � ;� �� ti . I � ' ;i + �_ ,\ Jr h \�, � , .�� e 1 � � .> ��' s✓ �,r•,.�r• i..�'.�✓3� �'��, j h 4 1� , � �v» tiif ,' "ZJ .o � �I� � �'�t'i )o�-2a � - .. n: � ,��iJ'sQ'-z65-.. -- •��.- �[� Tu �1�3��-,---- - `- .4}-"-"� _ , ..�.. � ' ..w7�`-�i i�f • �u �,,,� rr:rs .. /•'.1• jo �l+'aJTi• V.� ^ � � a ��D1TOR' S ' ` � ° C6'��) . I � . v _—loZJ._. o t_ N � Gir v� Fr,•,�/vy • i ' �J 2 . v. � � W� . . � . � � : i: �—_ � - (SGb� V � � � ! _��_,.. ° '• iFr_ .:� 7 �.! , "'',s- - f - • a y (6,'0/ . �. � . �3'� � ---- � �� aa - - / _ x � ;.+ar (N20� N.��I �0 ♦tisr� :S.r'7'�f1�� -' /nJ� '. l._! %le/�i/) !�H , _.. �.:10 . Y' ' � Su g}O 41 � y Y"o ti a y f`rl.0 �CE ^ �,P `3 ;'' O 1 f � C os, �+�� y`1 : ,r ;M� \ A . `�`' ' '.t�1 � �; _� __ '?° 1 7 +�`� �� . �� vc ,5` . \ � 9 � ir'�.� ` ;a�. ,t.f- �� .: v,� �� `' � �'_� ) �.. '-/!JS•- t�"�� A §�a � ' . . ! ' 6 -p ca .�� 1 � /9r � a � � „ �.� *. J C � !� o f S9 g.� � i.F �« �'� `e ,- � ` ' '' �'� s�a `� $`�� (,�1 °� �, � �' �` p� � ,\+. �o �..,3.n. � _--�? � r �v : ; � � i � i � � � `�� gt� �.m �� z. � q c� 0' �r L !'? � �Y n.,i o �0 ti • .�.' ? � �L� � 4 .. � ; ^� j,,.,.a,o � . 1 � � � --�..�� 65 � �l � o�. � :�- .,�-..1...�.��.,.. `�.�:..j, ,.c � '1 Y��^ss i Y?` .j i ,. , ��__,� -�--:--- � _ e.�. � i � �.' �'� �,� �-�, �.'� .�-# � � P� � :�- �-� , ..o x.,, o �, � �-33 _�� • OS 80 � � , . � y2�r.?c) y:: . � � � �� fl��/i��i �:o; ; � '• � -~� �-`i - — ii3Ec� ---- � � 1' � � Gm:.o) /,��j ° • ;i �t -- �= �� ,:�� -j,}. ._i6>---- at e�. - -- � { '�j� '»�:n!.:yft1 � . , � , � �..� . w �9�f .�� :v1J:� �%5�✓'%) I s'°. J . � 4.j, r'S� / ;;;' i 'j L17i��i i��fC � �/7Zc% � , ;s.<: 2 3 . :,� �_ ---�-�----- � ;'` � . . . .3�3.3 - , s � �, ,,o� � .. � . � �� '�� - _:< ..:: .. r , p., . i ��a��' �'��. S. . _.�..z.� 6 _ .� , , s� ' ' ' � . t I ' .__.— ~ DICK 6REGOR, L.S. #76-12 �'°�� ! �� ;� ,� ^ , ��• �. �; `�j-1 $ ' � �.s., P ;,�.,`�� ll .�, ,�-Z' � __ :i_'__'. _� 'v+ �{� � �, – _ --�5�.._ ... - " +S� f i""�r• „ `` .. • � ;r .;J�T.'� . . .y� � ' `` �-3' � � sN rc �~ /:�o� 1 Q ", :r i �' � �� ; „� ,..•f .�, ,, �! t . �� .°- . �- �.�-.-- - : �' � p 4�. � ^ �� ' �L� �f' .. f .. M J_'� . S�r't/:r ' _ . � ( ' 0� t� I � �. �1 . �;�� f .;tik�J /%� \°� Lt' \ 1� ' \ / � / ,�gl �� a �-- � � ` ` � �, �N "�� "��' �, > > I ��=3�.� .o..� i �Y �/,' � u , ya.� e6 ti ,, � ;.:......�► . . ., . ,. . . „ __._, - --- ..,•�� n � _ ,_ ,,va— -------- ..T`� -.�! - ,; r �y__ :: :: ,14 , .: ;. Ni �a� �. : - — . ��I t�o) � v ..t _ ' "'f v"— ; --;,. ��;,,1 ! s ''' I ! � ,r.-o; i�n i ' ,. '� '; 7 °' A�''v�.� A � � I %(i3!rflt[r Li �1 \ ` �7 (i.i> �j� �7'/� 4 ,' ..%4� �Jl s�irr,'9•�•� �,. i^. � . � i t ;, i�� ` �� . I � � ' ---�.�= - �,r��;� �40'� � � � �" . (S�CG N �„�„1 ` :� � % � �� - --s: �3 �> K� tv��? :".� .1 _�-' 119_ ` �° _/�' :-�':� .� �; //O ~ //O � '• /! :1 � � �, �'�'i �---` :� \ �LQ �.�� , ra H � r �Y. � r f `%S: ° ; . �.y . y ` � � .—�- �� h �� o . �,Q �ri�) �i � cJ � o. .i °� v �.,o �.', � ; �, r---==1 � �g� -.�f��.i �� ( .,,o � 9 0 �j i5 .1�Si�f�'' � I : � , 7'ur J• '; i �n '' , � 1 � � ��o !, n . Iw (,:n,l � ` .� r, �! �o ,�i,;;�oJ:rn, v a , / r 9 '� (\ 'I �' � �; ! rY�� ' � + i `�'°'; , � ..,_ �.: nn ..�,1 ij�. ,,�... r 25 . �. � ,. � ..a...a...,..=a.�. : � '-' � ... � �,�� l �T ��I(J� �� ' ' . . .I .... ' � �%✓�'��_ J� r. _� .., �.• , ��J ��i�'_'---_.:��_— - �'�. �;�.,_ � ,� . i �� q�� . � :. ' � �� yf�:'� �' �l + . � ' � . REG/STEREO PROfESSlr�NAL • LAIIlD 5l/RVEYORS �r�q,4L�1�?06 DICK GREGOR, L.S. #76-12 '- 1� SUITE 306 VILIAGE NORTH PROFESS�IONAI 6LOG, 7420 UNITY AVENUE NORTH BROOKIYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55443 �� `� ��:�� t.� �'�/�y PROPERTY OF ' Pick Gre or � d�scrfbsd as bl.lows • See shee-� 2 of 2 sheets for legal description. _ � , Pra�T�� - — — — — -- — � `RNE � � ln . —� � "----___- - . . _ . %3_ _�?_. At/�-"--/✓�, 9a 8� . ._ N i --�✓a,�� /;�� o� s ��z , . ' :s� f N b 4(,. Z Z/ � �� o�Lo f 3/ �4�Id S4b. N P c,� � J�/o. ! 29 --- . .-----_ .� 1�.Si `� - - 9Z.8/ � ' ' � � � � ' . � ) . , � �� r� • i. i � ,` � � � � � .i . i� � � , � G� p � �✓� � ; qj � (� � � • I� .. i � 1 Ch � - � � �1 � � \ � I . `v I , �� ' 1�� Q � � 1 1 N ` J � cv `-.�- —gZ'7� — � N� \ c\ o ' ' M . �, �I N ' 92.85 � � � ! ,� � N � A, o ,,. . , �i �� .► �.. � , ' ' ' , � � a� �, ,-, , ;., � I ; � o � o ' �\ ' � � i � 4 �� I \ � �' ' � � p,� . �� i � � � �\ I � M � h . . . � � ' �. � 'i --1-_�. --.- -__-;� � � ° ,o�, y � i� I �1 � 92.7G .,� �� . � ' � � WP�" � " •— ___._ �� (�� h � � 0 � • 92. �89 ; _'^ r � � � � �, . , o _ .Y . . . .._._�'� . 7.3-�.'2r9� :..�'. �i/,� _ '� � 1 Mr�py cerl�fr tnot thit :urwY, Olon, or raporf was pr��orRQ Ay ent or Sc�l�' I i�t11 a��1�...,,:00 fNf ........... undu �ny O�rncf ��pa�v��ion or,d Ihct I cm a dyly Rap��lt��d Lond Su�wyor •- Ind�f�s Iro� ��Mt S�1 �nd�r fA• lo�• ot tn• Sto�• of M�nn�toto. O— In1ie�Nt kw� MMwAwN firM � �r� l' ;�� _�'�1�fr�-<��t.� ..r._.._, soo�► . ..rrw ........� M........`�.1. .%..... Dcti /��ZS'-7lo pa9 No 90Lo� ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE The Council of the City of Fridiey do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. For the vacation of a street described as follows: All that portion of the street platted as Ely Circle N.E. as dedicated in Spring Brook Park Second Addition, Together with all utility, drainage and storm drainage easements on record and on file at the Anoka County Recorders Office within Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, . 16 and 17,B1�ck1, Spring Brook Park Second Addition, All located in the South Half of Section 3, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. � be and is hereby vacated. SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with � Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. t PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THFS OF , 1977. ' ATTEST: CITY CLERK - P9ARVIN C. BRUNSELL Public Hearing: Dece►nber 13, ]976 First Reading: Second Reading: Publish....... MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE DAY 2 � ' v I � � � � ,� •\/n � i,� ".Y' � � �� 4[P'� � �. . . .^ .�. ... .. �. +: � ��..' , ' . -° ROTTLUND OAKS P.S. #76-07 � . � � � �. _, , _ ,, 2 A - 1 . .. =� � , ; R. .. . �� ,. ,I , . E • � '- �r "*�•� � � . a: So � - 1_. �_ - . . . � ' Jii. .YLI�.....� _:\ . . . , .. � . ..l�" �� '��'/� � �ir'��I � � - � . • .. . . SION� ES• � o./C�..r: .�_� I,,_o�.��^ ......�G.�6.3�� ~•. �_`i.'� � 3e � � /o � _, . . .y�si � .:x, i '-�.5 1�� J, 3 � r - 9 O��' � � � /3 0� ^ � .�4� $� ' ( . f � , 8 '. �?i � �� h � ��. �/5 M � 3�� s � � � 9 /a a i� i3 � s ic tie �$j �s .: '� /2 " ,� . ' � ! ? 9' t �t��i � `� ;,� � � �,�o a.,, f �t / �' q � � z��e: k �I ! 3 ^ � 4' ` , w�-=-- ', �� . �p` �6 �t � � � .� 4 ` 3 �� 1 /� t A` � S ti o �5�9 .t�t• 'r �0��9� ' 'N •,,� � . . ' • f �%� ' � '� �� I, 0 ` ' � °r•� � • M � qa�: O �� • • � A � � w ~ � � �� V �%� � � � - • - Do ^ �q�a� aW �� ,,s � ' G` ' • � . � ' . . :. � .. � G+ t �19}�9 i� is /a( �3 T�`� � �' °��° �' f � ��n �\ �� ':`�� , � � p aa ,� � � � 2 Z-, Fi ZZg .S��is�� ,,r'` -. � �� .,^� ► .�� .?�`' � ,,, •. � 9 6 �' 7 �: ��ts � 43 g2bRt 7 3& � �3 I i � � � `� _`^,� %'� ,,'"� �r•� �,� � J � �,�. �. .• , y'� �. I • : � � z o Q �yl� � y�' S �. .. - - � „ zg �, �� - -� �KS ' � s � 3a � � � i ' `N � . . , .. .. . .. .. .. . ; i I ; _ �.'►, °v�. a }�•, .. � - i � �' y i�e ii ' - zT , � �o ;�' �; � J.>e • � � G T 8 � � ii /2 /3 i6 6ii P(/9 �a .i►?2 "� t 4'S t.�.3 S G� o ,,, . a ! 2.� �r S I ! , z ,s. , ,, �.y,� � ,3 � � M y 2 �'� Z ZAd � ` �!.•.A', Zs irs \,,.i'' s.( o�wis�' e ¢.,q o ZQi �� 2 2 g 2 I _�_ /2 \j� � °� =�•�i +�as� • � I d-,:a S go .� �� L:. ;.,� ` .w-.rr•� ,�s �- • y �� , \ •,u ,.;�e�'': , .; Y�``n �.-. 1 . I � � JO •�v %� c, r{ ', � rs ._ � . ..o ^ � . . �. . .. �- . • ��• .I t . �' i � "' w, � �-- ` _ °, ;, ,� 2 � g .� .. ., 3v , 6 � a. � 3s g r 1.� ' . , 3 3�.2 / � � } !6 "S �#4� 3,�i1 I 39�3Y 3i �3s a � � _ t I � .. = � 4� Q �, � ,, i � �„ � � 30�"� _' �a'.-a..l �. , ,�9` -2�E • i, u..�_ �� f ` ' µ o 1:,� _ ' �T� � �° i ..� I e � • '` ..t�.-� 1/ 3 /6 6 7' & 9tZ� ./ .Z' ""�fi1.� 2�� 3 � li � % i 'J 0 �/ /2 �i �%i�I� �i % O ` 7i .� � � '� « A� � 3 � ` � � ~� - , '" I 2�1 � 3 ��l �.2 t�7 y l c��1 �P�7' �fK� 1�49 �/ - ,�r. � ° �, -�a � � ; � ',f � - �. � � ' ��w .^',., , � , , v -�i��LLi�� . - � - - . . .. � i�i ' � ° ! . , �� :. c:� ao' .. ` .. .. . . 1'"T"�?� �s� � "'-a°.`w � � � T � //1 / � :i � itf�D N •�� ,'/GO �� 7 ` �4 a • \ v - ` � o 'ij8 •9 � :'s .v` 3� 'J 1' �lSc3 "�� / D/9 ;/I /6YS G' 3: 3d 33 Z /j It�17� ` .'-Z3 ` � e° . � � • 3�.. / � �� r� i' a ►,�� i� � � � � - ! I � ;�� '�`'� ,� � . �o z�° I � { �3 �. el.. � 1 r �� _ �. �. IJ, ..Q Se' !~i I !. `v ti� 5/O' 7� so �'.�.�. " i , , . � �� 7� � • ZO ��'? s � fa • { I j ' ttl� 0. .. � I•• If� �� 30 ; y,+`' � ' 1-•! �� 1 '�3 �1 3�� 11' /.i a � %/S. �' , �. �F ! !�7 n'I� '' � '"1�% v'7� % �� ' �' �J` •` � � � '�1±j`_ / �2/3�1� 3 /6 ✓d+/9��.�" t �� ;cI��a 9 �a��• z �� i 2 .a s�6 ��s s �ol�r' zri.� �r�s �� ; ��o '�' ,� G a �., -""�' ' 1 s 1� � I ( �' a i — - s.��. � �. _ � k=—�" =.'f'=a=-�� z.•` _ ;o ^ � � � � �I � lf { � -�- .� =�i` T- ,, r. . r, r. ..z... — .. , ... � 3 . .. i . i. T 3i (n Je r �' � ;�.,:6��.5• .� -7 � .. T _.��ie - w -- 's; �..... ��„17.9'� ... �.1 - :,,:� f.,.,. :� _. r �j ,. < _ _ ...,.v:A^„ . �".�y. .zw .�. �„ • x- i,ra � � . , w- y « �j �}/� � ? � "'/`jf.�;il� ---:.y {i�i•s.,r�-•. a.Krt*IaMf xl� ��i� y��oa�"'r�qyCJ'��O'�,5�� ''� \ �� •r. v� � � � j, ',�+'�'s�� ..; �� .y '� g�q .r�' t �� q � � ��P � �'' 1r�.. V , f � '� 7 � � y s � � 3a �{ � ,��,: g� �y ,� . � a ti ��. �/$q► �... � - ,.� � �, :�',,.n � 1 . ^�o Z � l � 31�� :., ,�yt� ,�,-� .� / �" j "s.y � fi�. !" � ' :. �� 1 �:�/ � 3g � � n�j�� s `�� fy $�g ( \�- � ��.� a � , 'L� � r�o 78$ � � y p� 8�0 O � 4 C� �,�,;�,� � a I � Y. , .., .... . � waa w . . . Q� + . � � ., � .'� �N __...____�7:_�i�_ .._.� "' •i�%� ��7�p0. '._' �� ,.«, '., �" ^, _� �I:. �'°"'"""`y�F., .! � o ' "• AllllITION P. S. �t76-09 � ,-: � .� � p \ i a � �"— DELIER , r _ / . � ,,.,, 3 , ,ii� ��..'9pi0! . 89.i.1_'_'..^".� � - _.._.._ . i�Z,.?Y�•_ .. - - - • .�� y -'- , I �'� � I � .:i: ; � : r �.: a'd � �� c i� O , i .c l��L'� � / � .r�,� � � i ^�, �•�:�� '�` �.te�iGJ •i /°t% � r� :f � f'1� �� a,� +,� CI� . /.3 � 1 '�y ' � � i. ` _i ,�.t,• .�r_ i � - — , ... � � t �.� �• a_9. � -.� �z.:t i?�;< J��.> >9ft:v .,._.ri.'.'��-~.,i.e<'"''� j ..� �� _�.� _,-�.�._�_. ., �- •�r �.:�,. . ,v �.�.fw �ti_ i �c`" � _ � 3 "' - - � - �, i ': � •,K iiq. .. ., • 7- : � f • � � r � k�''� � ) �� o . / h � , • �:.••.,�J' i" � r, i � �°�17 - � cr, ;i-r�l�_ ..�/.'� \ � • �c��;� ��Z�v� �— - r. �' ��' � �,�7� � d� t .ti ti • �: _l: �, � .. .'� �� :,.t. !9 � �: f' y" �� .'- �^"�l.i•1.:1 �� `Z St� .1' t!�p Z� , � . -� � --- ' % .. S°i�� . �+y �4' P�� . . �' i :/' {�� - � • ,�^ � ��. � �'+� � �� 's � 1 /;� �s` , - -- _ � � �'' o �('+ � � � ` � .rJ - �! :�-� �c `--�� — ��,.1� "� ,' ,. � .. �� ' ,.R.�s.:::-_..... �..�=�'i-----� � t�f � ;' '�i 4 �? ;r ; i� . = L i�j�• � � .,/ ! � t ^•��r /.1��R : V J� C � � I li \ � '+1 i---�- ♦ _ . d • _. I� . � ---1'« � 6i I \ ♦ r �1' ,'a, t•. �� S; d tJ -----.�c. - .i i y a ' � .� � < .. l 4 'Y ;-!.. 'v l •• 0 � r. �1 +y4. �t, .1 J �. / .� � M I ?. . ,�' ` �• � 3 + ,.: b r, o ti . i . . 3 . _ _ _ . . ^1r l -� s'. � r. � 'r �s �-- 1.a,. �� .� ',; �'GS/ /,•_ � Q __ �-- —/�„�V..,� _..._._. t, '�?�;�✓� c; m ,,�j : '� 1..'2 � �.] � Jlil �_ 9 �'^`. ) � � 0 -�~-1 '� • y. � .�!✓ � �I'./�' � � _ �" r.:.<- .� � �'/ �- - T 9 -- -- `': ` a�4 'o o + �.-.. 'f� d� i � .i �yi,f , ..,T_J�'.tio � � :� 1 . ..e1;tl i : �',�� s � s ti� �. i/Y.[9 � � . � y. :�iJ Y �j � ! ; (,bp) 'b, � � � -'-:- „+��v T�g?!�J . `- ��y», c t,� � o� 1 ' . _. `,, �� , � � 1 � 1 ., ',.7 �.'� �,r",, ti �'•3?i /z `'� `��' .y:� f� � �� / �� ils w1 ` Y ;j f .l9�,j•� � � �a' '°ti* � 3�.0) � 3� � <�y $ -� � .O \' � �\ \ i '� c ; � '; a � ��':.d ._ � � :�v. /t.t.. � � � , � t�w� •t ,:� ' + � � 7JY F� A 39 v/J_"' � - � 1 N9.0 - t 'i>; 3Oi� `�??� •,, .-:s-., ev?, e6 + p Y.; , ' �e -y zs;15 :s._..J......�.�...:':i. � _ �� , . � � -. :'. ` .�.�.. _ v ..... . , , r L ^ , _ �+ ----- _ —�- `''� , . . _ "� -'�"'"-r-'--- - — - - - - - -i_'li,a 67 )t , t t- _ ; -rr -��. i�;,�" �•�` , i. � .. ._.. _ _ - ,-3�" y` � - ->d '" ' � � f`'1 Y r... . ~ � ) ii 7 : • :'- . . �c• i I' ' :r - .... `,,� -.- �, _.� �' F �{� , . �� ...: j, '' � � II i3J� � �.�� r.f'St co. *°Y'' . ��a, c� oi ' ^ ` �w = J;6 p.',, , ��-; ��9 4 ";°,�'' � �, � , � 1 �' U) a � � 2 3 � ,• � A� „ ur—. � �.� : XiYlr,yfei 4 I 0 � - � ' � ('SS� �'i i�3 �! x , -1£:!.-':i �%� � { S._:7 _ 9•2� J `� .;c-.r''s� .37 9� h� i� .�, � I ' i � �= 1 � I' � ;. � , - � I " ��'; . a'.�a s''� a ', � /� ro ° n eP �' �.5�' . . 4 � �� ' .� ., � ": t .�� 'i : i'` ._a':' 6 idrt F > �� k,�, _.,. _ �� --.!;? a � � ��- tt'J , �,m K � i` ti /} �. P"@u c_ , •� i- , �,< i .'�r.i/.f1 �I� �4U0) �y. s• �4;� .� � � `� i_j � `�� `�. ,i" �� (�''� - �}`'''�� k' � --�- —Y. i � � ._ � �'� . _ � .�; � _..�.i-�• /� ..;r'' . « ,� �:� �' '' ., .5 � ''"� e._�..�..�. a"'M"..v .y7W �.+' �i� //C �� //o �M�-.../iJ... '.e � �A..:�.��._5'�_'_ ��,' %'f,7 � -.:�y � .xs h jk yv '� Vi � t, '��'_ �'m s � qo 1 1 t� � 1 �.. +�, A� f a Lw� �,y ` / v �'° C j, ° . . � i i��' q ; r Fd _ . � a i r Iq �. -:.^� 6 q �'}'j - t 1�. �'i � (9J! � �� _..i's�r�?$ P� .�� i : ; C �'� � . . ' ��.... :;.`. �. k� �..�` ' .� l3�-- � �� ;��I�r a �� . . \ f 1 � � c,�� ' � a 1� ., r � � �, ' f ' e"a 7 , e , . ,. is��'�' \. .� �'i�n� �I �4'rr + 'd' � 'a t.{_�' � �// �.q i a 4,� . ,'r ��+, *1. /oo i"t :y `�1 .�(- �� •'!1j J� � riL • �.E+' � a..�.', __ 1.rs `_ . /i7 _ . ti � .+a t A I: I �i. � �,t]!yiro�F� I{ � ' '�` � h ( ;`� �J4 �i do �^� 9�� . _. � i ��44 4 ;., ,� � �,! �' � /l7 !' � s i � ;,,� ; � ; ,; :' � , =:� �I ,; � ' a �.,�,. w � , .. °� f%<is.-.i:✓/'4 (� o- i �� 'v 1j ,`'1 w� 4' � :O' `�' � � :� (``�� .y ._ � A \' �4 `L) I. : ' � . b ,. ` _ + , _'.' ' � j t;, � i I ::� S� ''ti� '' � �� >,��'a V�� ...l.r,..�.�.....�.y�n� � n �.. �j��..r.....�...�a�..� }�-...,�...L�"a....s�.�.wi�'.....rri.:,o....��.r.. :'� � s�. ...�..a-...,.o... -.r�.�.e�.+....:.,...�. . t � ...�.,�... ..:'.:.. . `�i. . � � �. I . E '� °� : ! t - : Y-�_ - ---- - ---- , E.� ry ' ' �� S�sv -=.-, ,�-1 "'"""••: �`L.....�. , lr.,�).''"""E"""""'E'��jv /.'�2� t y y'.�r�+"""`y"'��./��,'�. �...�.�..;. , � e r.5`�...........�...�..,,.r.,..� .�.- 1 .� � � � p:i s � i j r' t, ,3 I` ,l ��"' �! S � ` ,•;1 .' j T { 't / ;i;, 'J� F` ';i�i r ; ; � • � � i . , ' �:� �.:: �b•�) �`�i ;, ( � ' , F — , w �� s�; i � Q �� n. '1M1 N •3 ! ( n��s�'� �� t. � � '' �� : ![t _ _ ' j I , i (" N �.�=�; �� .�-:� o �� ,, ,.,� y , � � �� ,t �_�. ._._ -�:� + _ � . , �., ; � . .. � �I�,� �Jl/' i9 -� .r1 � �#4�'.. � �. Y'�� f� ." � i , , � y ^ { 1 j � ' . � � ^-' `M ^1 d�.�.3 �,y .,� .�-.or. �' j�' g ��! �, �� 2_ �^ � -- - - i ( 31�_, `----._.. . - -----..--- `` F' � � � � --- f � ' �.y' !•'i % L LL � � E .��'' �',j' : � �!S`�jy;"✓��±�.. ,�t �.;+t�. _ 4 � � ; ,1 ,�h t T � ,� ; ; r( <� � � � _ . <. : f ; -5_i , i.: ?'r: •,� !f �rl ��' G' il� � j . , d � � � �`��\;Fi �'w�+ �I'i: fj 'f '� h,+ Y %� �f � i � �`t :2.. �;': �,� `�� •h � .� ��l ,t.4' wn�111,.)y4.�..1�".�. .L.r� � ;�S.avV....�.�wa.�.�. J •i [r..-•�� '� M ''� 1►j': ��«:J� �f •'fY�'^1� � ) f �!�- `�` ..'�''�f ^1 V l: k:` `� p. H `�ioi�..v. � � � f..� N�_._... .-�.+��L.'L./� �� - � . I r �i �tl L..�'• S -�j a... �'� l�.. �!. �� .._ � . ' �,,,,,.,,,.!1'° "'':`.•..'"• : s: G"',°,;.-'{ �.......= ...�� . . i I :r�� o ::t � .< y .. � 1 1` � 1 � ' r; r` ' � �::f�% . !� : b �' ~ 3 ` �' ::� � � e "., '.� ' • .c� ,, � . � � �. " �: , �' -.0 9 � i r.r.�.�/:. - ` � 1, ; �� ;' .1 �• .� / n. ,a 4'' P,s a'" '� ,�.�;• �'aa..��a,� 2 � � ` � , . � __.. .. . _ . _ __ . , ,yao,?;, ;%c,c; '� � ��» � � �•.,y i � � � '' � , , �t � , r'�7 r rNy� ( f r� a!; � . .`•e . � . � 1 ! � w' �.�`i'{ ftJ _1.n.•' ..��c�,�i `_ � ' '� fi . �.�.w�1'�=::.9.� . ;i.i.'� f�e: �� t� .f6Q ^dt, ; �� r S/ ;, . I.. ..�., k . � ��' �� ' ` ' � �� + � ' ^' ! ��8 ` � �� .5 °�� i��, i;1=� � I�fr�`%� �' ��i�i.tl�'c:? � � � l �'� _ .._._ ___ s �� I � ! - f " ,� :,-� r,: � �. F , . . . . � . . _ .. . �.' � .;,:.:'. ^' . � �"�ti.•ra�t.w+fr ��.....�.,.+.,... �.....�s.^.!: ,r.^.-� .. . . . ^..r..!y : _. -n��x�'mr : re+Rxr�+r.rr � t � �� . ^ J... . . full.' �. •Ir .f►Y•�'t. i�..�__ _ ..'-"-._��...._ _.. __ . ...._ _.�._ ._....°-'^._..-_ .._ .. ... ` . . -_... ._ ._. 'i v' ; . ��. ..f ��%' _-^'�N Y � • i1�1. 4� • -,�, �:w �-i �v Jt. �� r . !/ �:� c: G �?.'�r��' I �+i'�i,�. i .? 'i � r � 1 ' �� a �� .o .. � ` . / r , �? ♦•'Y+. ♦ t.. � � 'f � ��f f� / c / � �' �,�� `° :t,. ' i' . �/' t� ° �''. ��'� 's � / � .i � � � � � � � REAI, ESTATE 10 ADDN. PS 76—�" � -• RIt�Ei� � - ¢. , � �, / �., :�'',i�, .:%.s�� ( - I ', / � :: s,• � �,. •y.> � z� I te iv I sc , I rs � �+' ,-. / !. i v . E 7so. e �y' ' - - � .,.� �..r.. � : � ` �,y �J�,[� y� � .�'� � � ��. _ � . .rL _. � �� _..f1F:Yl.��'f '� �.��t .�.,� ` � f s �fi•�....._� .7f.1i��6:_ LElL1 � ��A� `�, _.... . . 5_ Vt� '4� " 1�o.fJ `3f7� __ �. / -IL.. �si19 /-��'' y J .e `��' 1 `a� Ml ' � / �\ � � ^, r�3 � i �.?' '�R 'e ✓ ;r 3i i,��y3Z�li ' � X '� , / � J! , I � , �;' '� ' , ,/. ��ii��r,.� ! Z �! n ( � r �sso s ,. � l PJ' �. s . . /i9d�Ofrc /n. �� .!.!! �'`� f \ '' � �,Y� •. a'rs• � � !'iA,7 O . � '� . r/S \ S'O .S�aI 1ki� � �:I __ �• �' ' . � :. �l �.1. i c � � ; � L__ . ' ' _ �_ y : .- � . ti;� s ' �2 � ,, '` �-� rr �' a y �y'S, � +�y. a� : r _ __.__.— ,I` ; �.� ? � �'� � i,� ,/ . / -- v fswJ �� (�� ti Y �' /4 � „� _ �' �';f ' ,� : j3 N, c+ yv.�°. , iu.,. � (�= Q(cov� , ( � � �ti � /UUit. O.i C »n .. .f.6_. .',�✓ � . '"n/ ' ' V �`. __. � "� • •,'i /J ' r n P.v �ti . � ti..4'�r >r•e Q �, ti 1'�, ts v : ♦ ��. � � ;, 3 , : � : �:. ` �.. h . . _ � r . �i �� ; (�-, ti, r � � .. . -ii�- V : ; . t r ` . -.� . _ / . ... 't .io _� ._�f1.6,t �:_..� .r�L_ . /zo._ ��' �... !�'s.. __::L o . .c... ... . _ -- p , ...t= � • _ r . ,, ' aS . -...,dl7JG•�.•'�'eSr.R _ . n ''�. .• �7 7S ' ',- '' J� � �q s n f f ? t 4 1 I 2 %� .. ,y �� i�J�l:.�� t..J !� i ' tr ! � � +.� $ �� , ..� f�'- o..grr.v S.•o ne % . �z �..� a .$ a ��,; �sso) . �s��• 5 jY „ � ti � f '�� i� .A., ._�a.��tj:..G+' �. i - ; 6 � . +• . K "� �S .S' K Y �� $ M � � '-� � I` � � � J 4 � f 1 - -isf � /'6Ako:}�'JlfY �e + � '�v -.'�;.SE 9? - <-. 5 t = .� . �/e !�!i✓J js.;.il��1 x/ n t 7. 1 �. � _ ` �,. � '' .7-� -- 09.�"' � .��1l.:as: a �se k� ��nr..s , r 7 tsB + � p�i, ilj,•y�r. .,,'°�_ f c -� • f„ J'S'3 .t. � � \ ' _ � ! t:,�!' ._ —�T�T— !! � , ' � •�N 9��! ; 75 � �s ' ;i� j5 T-.�i- � ��!" (� • ff.t i "=!: � scss9l.a'"'.a1t I -J�etr�r � 1 I j .:�,li' 3��' t � I•p.Il }1 OI.�:1 "'! tJ! , 1 !' � r{ � � �- � , , w '^, a '� `i ! '� ..._ 1 ;°� f I: ` n. '. . J: � M � ` � ^ � �'` �, ~ q , � � • � v` C- � 5 � 4 �+ 3 � 2`� � G r s 1 . ��,'y;r ` �� 1 � �..%.i, � � ��5� -i.4. 7 3 �'e . „�� `: *�_ � � � -J- ie�s a� � . _ � � : , . ,. ; . j' ��,� � � „ i,.: n -. ' -- -v �_,::;.; s •,: � vsre 1 : .� .,Y � arf�� <:h .F � . - . , �_,_. ,, 1 � ,� ,,' 4. ; � 1 tl , ,�� '+ '� � �� 1 �) ��w � ;q n � ,� .. s �a � - -' i/OI �. � �. _' � i �Y '-- s •-iJit.36�-' �' � ��, . � �,. g�� -� " �O ` 9 �j 6 7 ' � Z ' 7111.�>, ' " ' '. � 7' af IS :� -` .+e �;,�LYf�QiE DRlV= : j�� •/1�T��'. . �a 'o�. / 4 L� ^^ B o ? � � � . � �'� . .. . . .�� .•r sw;. . _. .. . ,�o.... - - �•""' ,• ` I ' u.iJ � 't1r7 ; .,, . > , , . �. � __ �, k.:� .os i/ JO . , i • �: ,1 '� < �� _!OITa�� _ . e, �:�z -, - ' � � .:a'93:r �: � ---- — -� �' -� "` - ---� � — msi �_ 6So' ` a ' ° ��(.'> �� ( `j. � � � /� � 14'ai � � � Ly �N:L�.£.C_ �..°� �1 �/Z70.' 1 f � - (:, � .�� -T � �. � }' _ _ r r _ -------- --_ _ ._ .... ' . . .. - ---- - - -___. _ 'r---...------ ��- 1` ' .�.�, 1 �� -�-' � -J�'= _is-�..- u �� M1� , � `.5: �, ,: �oo) ��` ' �5� � � % � � , , . , ,.. : . � �� `b - %.,+• \ i �... _._ � --- -- . .'-� ..-�---..._.__....` . ._--- li�......_._... � ---.--a----_... ____�.__._t�G.:1-.- . s,?—.: 1 i';, ��.� ��'\ � U f� i� I�j I j l O�'� ,' ,,,,. : � ' 6�. � `� ` i �j.JO ) �, � �� r�F` • \ � ,,\` , � _': i ..� • ..� � � 1 1 ..� i� � .... . ............-'-.........._.....=•r:-'•...._.....� ._...1._.__._ ...__._._ —I� �1------._....._.. 'T�t ; � .1J:: �` �'•,, i ��f/�� ' ! e � .q, .� 1 .� � _ X ��: -------------�-----------._......_._..._......--- a�-. •-�---�---•-•--•. _..��_ �L_.__ _��.. �- �_ � `:�« ', \ (/70oJ Q L � �560) � � ,;#�s No. �� _------ "-- -,: ----------- IA.. ' .""" ""'-"'-""•"'..._._..._. ... .'•--r- .'..._. ..... _.._.. _ _ ._I.�►l! � Rvsi.T�irsor�..�- _ ..� .____'--'-------- • \ .�.�� /BSGf ( o'.^i -- _— - ' "' ,I� �' .�. ._.........._.................... ......_.. ..---�.�..._....... .'.� � � � � ;p . . ,' --•• _ ' . `�I- � �\ � � � ,, � I; �i . . , °;�{ ; � t:�. r p ' .::�ld L� nL•ibl; ' . . • , '�+, � \ '• �J 1 i � i. . .. M• ' : ' . , ••;` � . , •� �i::';� , ^ � � . ' �I� . � . � �OaR' • I rM r. �.� � ' � ' / � _` , `�s�� f ... � .:�_k�fvt,`� ,:y�``°•.`� •� I �l-•• . . .. ' {�.. . y i, i�t• n � - ' _ _ _ ... . . '� .n :� _..,. . ��;�. -_ . , --� � � . � . a ,. .. ti � h3 Ati o• V Q � Oi y ?y / V � O � � �� ::% � / ` I 1; ` ��, a t .j � � i�r� . . , ��r \�b � s. � � ; '— REAL -F:STATE 10 ADDN . P. S. 7 6-3� � � � ,� J / � 6od " .i I�✓ �4 . ! � — .� � � /�� ...�006 b � � '�n y.. ;�. , , 1 � /�b. _ ----�'°a r ,_ � �,. ,__ ,.,, -- 206 � ^— ' ._�--_, ,,._ -Fc,6 /I--_`... _bp� "-- —S06 / � �. _—. — -- — -906 0, _ � \ � �� .� \ ' �tp � t �' o � 4 c o � �� : � - 'o o' \ ?4 Y � /rPi .5�� ,` ' � r �a , � ��` ; � I a"��.°,� � � �' �� / �ti I �4�y / O �P 1� / • � �ok , / � / / i i �I � � �,� �. � ,��r � / ,�i'`� /� �� s° ��% � a- .i ,,��`� / ` // .1 J� / / ) / • \ � �� / , / � �''' / .�/. ��I ` • � / i•� .� I � � // �/ � ` � �/ / ' � � //,� � ; � /, �� _ �� / // �j ////// T � / �j //,-� /� �/ / � /�. � �\ � � / � // o� / �/ � � / / / `\�.� + \1 �� . 668�-'"' w i I��I�� .. I � � I I�� I o 2 � � ��I��i;� a � :�i ;.... I ' ��fjJ�� i � � � "'�U l��I,1 � , I �--� / ��q� � i � � 1 � : •, / '� �I I � � �" � _I '.�/ .�III' \� ` 1 O Q J' / � I�I� � ��, !�� a �m ' P j / �� \ � � �°� � 0 i f p• °' \ � g, Q� D06 . � �� nl �i�\ \� 4 , ,o � � ; ...�`\ �III �\ \ �� ( ha, `' I� ��I\ �l J \��'�� /i ' ' � -~! � r , I�; ; ,,, ��1q� , �;;,� � / � I I � h0��c�,y •' �� / /� �'� , I I�� oF�jq�.�o'� / � / c. Iv6—�.�� \�_ q�/�� 70G— _ ,£v6---� � � \ �� , � , .,� �� / �i � J� 1 � � , ^ \ ,��, � ,.� / S �F�6 � . / '�r'�'` � �o' � I L' / / , � . rJ�rf /�% ,� � 5 ��j .� y`i �� a , �� i � �- /'//� v . `�. .�. .. ._,........� --. ....-... � �s M � Y q. ~ �.+C O� d � Y�r .+ �+- c.- a. .n 4 0 c t u c p,.t.+ a°i i z � c r.+ �< � `� �>c.'�+�v°aio � r- x � O V 9 y. p N A O u N vv u u � � c" W C C C: M> d�� N*y V � p�~.. J la. � N L d A N r b �o V� Nq1 � v �� Z L q� l s C 1 O Y3Y ONO ✓OY�^O L O L V� � d �~ � d� q N O Z O! O G L N pa�Y wf V- G�N�+ � L C W C j^ q N O F q��0.�+�10 Cav ta.N c�ta.m�v'�� ' a� �n �,y a.cv�n NrV� M COY-�!I OIF� � y p � p N Oyv L N N V V' N 4- O N.� L 0l N� O O x �n � u � ov o> > y p� L NL NL'r TN � N W OL �1-- �y V" N fJV G ✓.'�.� ai a+ a+ v i u c v- � C �� cc ua+oY a� p..�NrOVLJ�N �� ; Cp W N Y C 00 Vbk- LL S_ L 6 C'O 2 V�1 L M Ol � Y N N O N s+ N �U O� L C p„- �t ° .�- av- ��t o J O� O M 9 O N OJ O S v M U . . i / •`,. .' u u N �+ O C�p O O C O W d�+ L.-O L OCT �0� c cuNb br-r- L L' N q C 1p C N +' q.- G U N V O d N p N'O �O W T O V N w� � W p� q W N i C O� ✓�(1 M 4� a+ C C f. � 7 O•� •� O M C C s�c��aEifi d ' a;v�rvoq� ♦� ai.,..-c� ~O� ONNN � N C M� L a. �OY+- C� d tTp1 N c�-� vc-t7 V N.; 1�.� 4 w � C� O � .n v .c r+ �. v, ..- �.._ � v �+ N {. 4A ,� � �� / . i �� BG�� i i ,�,;�\ � \ i u° � �' � `� �' - —� �� / / - -- �'�- - -- ---�t , ' � � (�- T =� t �7 f . F 7 ' 4 `y( , ,' ` '';� :. � �, 1 ;, ; -) t-.-- -- � `�� _ J �, .� _:, -==�-_-- -----�;� � �� ,��. 1,�;:�� /'� '' ---�-___J ��; i �, �\�� \ � / '� / � �� /_,,;i� i1' � . \ / � \� ��V�g. �.01' �� `� � � �� . � `O � � . .. � � , � � � � ,� � �► � � � � � _ `�. � '^\ �,; / \ / ' � � i � \ . g�pc,!� � � � �g � � �,� � � � � � �-- — —� � � � r� `� ' — -- -- \/ . i �,a�� p J � � G --� � � r - -- -- _ _J L_ _.._..J '� � � ►--- -- -- -- --� �� I • ,,,�!.�`' `"� � � �,:,, � � / ` � __ _ __.J �� ,___.._ .._� �x�sr��r� � p��rM�ar' CoM P��K �� 7 . -� . i GAG.E :,t iilc i: A, p�•tt � oe� 5 �ROi�osr:_� o� Jt� o C /^\ - �"; .`: ;:�; \ �.. ;�� : z, ��:i � '=�., ;:,�; � , `� ��'�:: �,-�� :;� ; � .i+.\,� � ��'r ,: �, • � ; : .' ; j ' y ,�� ;�.: � �-� y �.r/'''� �, ` ' ,�• 1 V � �'�� rs �c��k: -- - �, ��-- i t s ; � � . � � �. O Q � O � ""J • 1 q ` � � W � . V O � � � � �� 1 � O � �� . f.b�w/.h f ��r. 1 � �ti•�� .i ��•...�•�' I �.�.. . . . . .. Iwi.�� . ��w� �v.I•w'��_ 'J � �_ ,',•, ,... y � 1 ; 4' �� . � : ��l e i ; M « � �SM ( N I , � I � ( � . a� N -� � � 1 '• h � I : ' •��' � : "�- � (sI•u,MN . � . i �� .�p� _.:.,— ' � • � � --"�. _ • : I 1 • �. MYP71=�)�IRM .' : � ' � � :. ooa' �wa..:..- . � oo r: I � ` �,ir.�a,v � ; I � � � ' 'y � �- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -� -� ��? . � � ^", ��w f .M.r 6�� '�'^ �r:v �S _ - "1 :, ,c: ' ^ r� 1�• � V - w � � � � �Q — w- � r' "' " �'m k� ...$ � �� f h O� � � � M � 1 �q� .. � ' � Ih ^ � . � .:�' • � __ _f�j"�o 1. � o � - t..,M1 - , o N . '. � �. :.S ; ° ,,�x+y' �'- '�o I . •�,�• 1IA~NUy�t9'_ �IpI:.N R�� I O �� ' .•�• 1�•.- ..�,g ` �.:.•. ., t; � _ _ �� .. +. p � . . •. �i �,4 �- -- � G ..,� �Z' � � w.e�.F..IOF . . ,��r � ;� w � w � 0 � ^ 11 i �!�'.,H.t ., ,� ` �'ii -- � �g ; -�;�,�, �.,,.�. o ;� z � ///''y��' �� ` `" ► .� . , ; --' �; �8 �1 v g �� ..� �1 n � b ~ �� ^ wJ � ./.:•�: � ' M.� G sIf ..- ; .r _ .� � .-. ' : 0 � . � �,. _ _ - u%�r s � i.: � , .. .M.`i.E0.09 �� i.'� -- ' .� � - i W • • '1='`' '� m�„ ? '�t o . m .�,� n "j� ',f:f• . � c o° I Y � �'ti� _ - ,�� I 1 . ' — —, � l . �1 .. � � -'' - _, :� ; � , . , , �:, : � � + � ,•: � 3 J � I 1 .2 i I M ' � rf �. � . n � � 2 (: � � r , � 1 I � ;' � . I r ' , Q / � � 1 Z) L � � ' t ` -.t i ` . � 1 ` � � - � : �_.,�, W I / � / `` � „;.:, . i� � , .., .;-- _ ;� ;w � �x � :;« � - :,, , N ' 1 itv� • � pOff � { ...•.. t' � ' � f.:. � -�'��n I �' Q � ' •• a�, -`�� h � --- -�, . � M� � , �--__-- ti v �r �--�� . �� . . � •A' e o� ; ti. :� a�r_ Iy �l "� ' � "� ' / • 2 1 � ! ., ;: .3, � _, ' `'' - 1 � • , ��, �.�::y ✓j`, .` ; : - � • I i . •!t�'!'� � a .i^, "�• . , '`3 1 :. • . n.A,' I/ l N. . l• • � -q �.. s��s, tio� : � � � ' + I . .: J � ��, ° r • �~ - � • / / � i • ; Q `` • a � � �� 1 '� ` � `' .` � � � - � � I ` � 1 � � ` . , C ` ` f �� '�` ~` I' •� �� W , . .� �.:a.,�.� C� : 1 � , i J �� ...i,�`�• s 1 , . '. •. _ _� � ._;... : / �.: .� ; ; � �: .\ ; —. !� . � `�� `__ . ♦ Y . � I • •• .'' ' ` \ '`':?•.. 1 ' `` . . ' ��'ee.I!„A �• � � .��• ry I ' � � '•V - �'. .rp� � ` �.� • '` 1 � . ' � '.! �. � • � ,\ ~ ` �l�; J 1 ' .. ,� � . . ' �(` 1'\' . 1 � • • . � . w1 R' r:�� • . 'V f ��, . . . �' . � d ' � �y ✓�• 1 , . , 1 1 ' ' 1 ' 1 ' , �J , �.� �% ;� '- ' �✓c C�.>�<.,.- , �, r �,' , � � �- i ' ,: MEMORANDUM T0: Fridley City Council FROM: Virgil C. Herrick, City Attorney RE: Replatti.ng of Innsbruck North 'Third Addition DATE: December 20, 1976 � The developers of Tnnsbru��k North Third Addition have applied to the city for a replatting of this dEavelopment. The replatting was to change certain property lines for the purpase of substituti_ng two-car garages for single-car garages. The effect of i:he replatting would be to change or reduce some of the co�:-.�n area in the original plat. Zf this request were approved, it would a�so be necessar;� for the developer to obtain the council's approval to amend the original townhouse pla� granted pursuant to Fridley Ordinance Section 205.14. Since thE: last council meeting, I have xeceived a copy of a letter, dated Decemb�r J19, 1976, from Jack Lindstrom, President of the Innsbruck North Townhouse As::ociation. This letter indicates that the Board of Directors of the association have rescinded their approval of the above described change. I have examined the declaY�ations of covenants on the Innsbruck North Third Addition plat. These de:clarations provide in part as follows: Article III. Use of The Commons. The Commons shall be used strictly in accordance with the easements granted thereon and the rules and regulations of T'he Association. There shall be no obstruction or interference whatever with the rights and,privileges of other lawful users of The Common�s, and nothing shall be altered, constructed upon, or removed from The Commons, except by prior written consent of The Association. Procedural Provisions. No building, fence, �r other structure shall be erected, placed, or materially altered until the building plans, specificati.ons, site plans, and other documents deemed nec�essary by the Architectural Control Committee shall be presented to and approved by said Committee. . . . Article IX. . Architectural Control Committee. The Board of Directors of The Association shall a�ct as The Architectural Control Co�ittee and carry out al:l the functions (of said Committee). ' It is apparent that the pr��posed changes cannot be accomplished with- out the consent of the Board of Dire�ctors of the association and of the 0 0 �. '� -2- ' Architectural Contr�l Committee, wh:ich in this case are one and the same Iorganizations. I would sug�est that the request for replatting and.the „' .request for an amendment to the townhouse plat be tabled until such.time - as the developer and the Board of D:irectors of the association reach agree- � ment. . _ ' • I VCH:JLH � , . . � ' '. � • . ' ' ' , � � ' . ' � ' ' . ' . ' . ' ' • � ' v, v�' �nnsbruck J�ior�h To�nhouae Associ�tion 550� :�'.eister Kaad � Fridley, l��.2d 55432 I7ecer�ber 19. 19?6 � P�xaydr 1:illir�m ttiee City ,of Fridley 6431 Gn3versity .�ve. �. r�ridley,r;:lv �54:32 13ear f:�`�yor Ne� : Thig is to in�'orr� you t}��.t the �'�aT.l �a��. of 171rec�ars of tho Tnnsbruck �arth �ownhou:�� ssoci�:�ion in r��etf.nK thi� c�ate, �3�cerr�b�r lg, 197�, recon:.i�iere:? •th� ruestian of ti:Q re�2at o� the 'T`hir� 1;ddition of the :Cnnsbruck 3�ortY�� '� o�anhouses; �nsi after len�tby c�i�cussian, 'toak ��.�: fo11o�:�in�; action: . '��'a reseind ti�e a��ro�T�i2 �;iven by th� Fxeeutive , � Cor�r�ittee to th.� :.�s.r:^el �'�rr �or�,oration on or abaut Se�fi,�mber �, 1��7�, �°�7��.�=� �Q��d �.11ow him ta increa�P �h� si�e vf the �;��a�e� for Unit�s ' ' 7, �3, 9► 14.� � 11 G.iid .1.2 ta t.r ci si}�z�;l� ar13 4wo dauble s�:�.l.l �aru�:�� a€�r �zu ildin�.*,. " �e, �Me oific€�r� of thE �.n�n�bruci� ':c�rth �°a�fnhau�e R�aociation, :' req�a��t that th� Gity Q�' ;��ridl��t x'etject �Y�e ka.rr Cor�oration' � pro�osPd rE�l�•t of the '�hi:rcl :i��.tion at yailr Deaember 2Q, 19'i� �ee�ins; o.� the City Cour�cil. iJ � �' , � � ' ' Zt is rny intention to b� at th� �ity Cauncil �'eeting on �ecamber 2f?th ta �nswer �ny qu�:��ion� you may have. . Ii.e�,�eetfully, CJ ack Jandsiror� � ��id�nt Rom� xhone: Off3.ce " t ec t �arr�1 F�sr Corpor�t:ian .:11 �eai�.Ent� pn ��r:v 3�7a►�•ir�n P:�s�s 5?a -1�3 � 37?-�131 . � r ' CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANt'dING C01�•IISSIOPI P�IEETING - DECF.�4B�� 8, 1976 7 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: � ...,._ � Chai�person Harris called the meeting to order at 7:32 P.M. ROLL CALL: � Members Present: Harris, Bergman, Lanoenfeld, Schnabel, Shea Piembers Absent: Peterson Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner 7 APPROVE PLANNING CO��IISSION rIINUT�S : NOVEP�IBER 17 , 1976 . <� . MOTION by Langenfeld, seconded by Shea, that the Planning Commission minutes of November 17, 1976 be approved as written. Mrs. Schnabel nated that she had been listed as present, whzn actually��lrs. Gabel had attended that meeting. � UPON A VOICE VOTr,, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING RE�UEST� Z0�1 ;�76-06� BY GEORGE- TO'r7N MOTEL INC.: Rezone from i�i-2 zeavy industrial areas to C-� general business areas), that part of �,ot 2�, A.S. ��78, lying T,,Testerly of the T�desterly right-of-way line of P4ain Street P•J.E., lying Easterly of the Easterly railway right-of-�aay line of Burlington Northern, Inc., lying Northerly of the Northerly right-of-way line of 'Interstate High- way #69l�, and lying Southerly of a line drawn ti•lesterly at a right an�le to the East line of said Lot 2, from a point on said East line distant 507.60 feet Southerly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 2, except the Westerly 218.16 of the described property, subject to easement to Northern States Por:er Company, the same being 5600 P�1ain Street N.E. I'ublic Hearing open. i�ir. Robert H. Brokopp and i•�r. Dave A. Oleson were presenl; representing '' Burlington Northern, Inc.; I�ir. Ken C. Alielson was present representing Burlington Northern Land Develop�7ent Corp.; and Mr. Carl George �ras present representing Georgetown t�:otel, Inc. � . ' , Planning Corunission Meeting - December 8, 1976 Page 2 � A � � ' 1 , LJ ' � � ' , ' ' LJ ' � ' ' Mr. Boardman informed the Cor�mission that this was a continuation from the last meeting, and they did have representatives present from Burlington Northern and B� L at this meeting to answer any questions they might have. Mr. ftobert Brokopp of Burlington Northern stated that the Burlington Northern Land Development Corporation had been formed two years ago to try to develop property compatible with Burlington Northern. He said they had properties in some locations that werentt specifically industrial, and they felt that they should possibly develop those as commercial. He explained there were three railroads combined which had large land owning interests in various parts of the country, and there had to be some tie to get all of these properties managed correctly. i�Ir. Brokopp stated they also had a third division, Resources, which controlled the timber, oil lands, etc.; so they actually had three real estate departments--property management� Resources� and Burlington Northern Land Development Corporation. Mr. Brokopp said that in trying to do the best they could with their property the situation arose along Main Street and 69�. He explained they had created the Northtown Yard, and it was thought that perhaps they should consider putting a motel-type arrangement in to handle the crews_from Northtown. Mr. Brokopp stated that it never really got to the point where they could consider that as a project, but when they were in contact with Mr. George with regard to the crew handling facility he saw there would be a�e�d for a facility in the vicinity of East River Road and 69�. He said the piece of property that seemed to be most advantageous was the site that was an question--north o� 69� and west of rlain Street. He explained it was zaned N1-2, heavy industrial, and they always intended to develop it that way. He said they had the property since 1965, and the reason it hadn't been deve7.oped was they were not sure trhat the plans were for the Northtown Yaxd. He explained it was for that reason they hadn't been able to develop the property industrial, but they still planned to. � Mr. Brokopp stated that they had the Land Development Corporation to develop the property because they didn't know how it would work out; they wanted the highest and best use for the property. He explained that with the George- town Motel they could see where they could give up a little corner of the property which wouldn't lend itself as well to industrial as to the motel operation. He added that they didn't feel the motel operation would be incompatible with the adjacent i.ndustrial they have planned for the rest of the property, and urged that the zoning be changed in this unique situation to accommodate the Georgetorrm Motel operation. I�Irs. Schnabel asked if the property had always been zoned y-2, and Mr. Brokopp replied that they had owned the property since 1965 and it had been zoned l�i-2 then. Mrs. Schnabel asked if he could foresee in the future any chance the railroad company itself would use that property for any other operation or if they were looking for other companies to use that property instead. Mr. Brokopp replied they had used it in connection with their operation and were trying to make final plans for the property, which was rather difficult to do. He said they primarily would be interested in getting other industry oii the property. rlrs. Schnabel asked if then there were no major plans for that property by the railroad� and Mr. Brokopp said C � ' Plarining Commission Meeting - December 8� 1976 Page 3 no, not at the present. He explained this was in the throes of planning and they were only five years old as a combined conpany, and it ��asn�t that easy to formulate plans. � t�ir. Lan�enfeld said that their main concern at the last meeting was the future development of the properties North of the Georgetown project, and the � �orimission was hoping the railroad might have some indication as to what they intended to do with the remaining portion and if they had any plans for the portion immediately adjacent tv the Georgetown Motel project. �Ir. Brokopp replied they had no i.mmediate plans, but he would envision sone- , thing similar to what was developed along East River Road and 69l� in the . Southeast corner. � � � ' � � � ' ' , � ' � � �J r1r. Dava,d Oleson, also representing Burlington Northern, Inc., stateci they had brochures showing pictures of their property and giving information on it. He said they F�ere sent to respond �to inquiries promoting the property for industrial use, and passed out copies to the Corunission. He explained they promoted it for industrial use and it was their intention to continue to do that. rir. 4leson explained that the Georgetown plan was brought to them by the T.and Development Corporation, and Burlington IJorthern was basica7.ly acquiescent to that request by saying that this area t,rould not - deter from their efforts to locate industry--at�least to the best of their judgement at this time. Mr. Bergman asked if it was the railroad's intention that the land from � the proposed Georgetown parcel all the way to blst Street presently zoned ri-2 be developed as M-2, and Mr. Oleson said that taas correct. Mr. Bergman said he was a bit concerned about the piece between the proposed George- twon parcel and the tracks, and commented that the Commission had been a little surprised that the rezoning request did riot expand westerly to the trackage. Mr. Oleson replied that one of the reasons might be ihat there was always a need to preserve some area for trackage for new industrial facilities, so certain clearance areas had to be maintained: rSr. Brokopp stated that another reason might be that for years the Highcaay Department had been unhappy with the underpass on 69l� under their tracks. He explained that underpass had been built to accorunodate High*aay 100 and was not built to freeway standards. 2•1r. Brokopp said the Highway Department had come to them and said they would like to rebuild that bridge to highway standards, and the railraod felt that they should provide a wid.e enough bridge to put additional tracks across there. He explained the reason �ras the trains were increasingly longer with more cars on them, and in order to bring the �ains in it may be necessary to put additional tracks along the East side of their present tracks, and that would require additional right-of-way. He further explained that the 218.16 feet of the parcel of land tras predicated for additional right-of-way if the bridge on 69lt got changed and a larger one was built. He commeni;ed that he had no idea where that stood with the state. rirs. Shea asked if it hadn't been discussed at the last meeting that perhaps Georgetown might like to pick up that property later. Mr. Brokopp replied that the original plan for Georgeto�,r.�. was to have an exception of 100', but their operating department didn't think that would be sufficient to allow the �� ' Plannin Commission Nieetin - December a 1976 Page � 7 C g � , ' motel operation to expand. He stated they then discovered that property would be needed for trackage, so he thought the width got expanded North and South � in order to arrange for this. � Mr. Carl George sta additional trackage �or the rezoning he .ed he hadn't known that property would be used for for Burlington Northern, so he thought if it was criteria would offer to pick it up. . �Mrs. Shea asked if the Georgetown Motel couldn't go back, if they would ask , for more property on the side to expand. r1r. George replied that they felt � within a t�ro-year period there would be a need to expand, so then they would � have to go to the side or to another location. Mr. Brokopp added that it depended on the State Highway Department and what they would do, and their plans for the longer trains, etc. He explained they were taking this as � they went so it wasn't easy to answer questions like that. � i � � � ' �� ' , Chairperson Haxris asked if the remainder of the land behind the proposed Georgetotan riotel deyelopment �rould be similar to the type of operation described in the brochure rir. Oleson had passed out. Mr. Oleson replied. hopefully, yes, but it was difficult to see what type of proposals would' come to them. rir. Harris said that he was a bit confused at this point as they had seen a brochure at the last Public Hearing put out by B N L that described the use for the remaining property as something else. N1r. , Brokopp agreed that woul.d get confusing� and explained that his company for�r�d the other company to handle the many, many properties they had that couldn�t be categorized as either industrial or operative. He said that whi7.e it may seem strange to the Commission that they were both advertising for this property, it was really for the good of the company. Chairperson Harris stated he understood that� but Burlington Northern V�as advertising it for one thi�g and B N L was advertising it for something else. He said his question was� "what are you trying tc sell it for?" He read to the Commission the site data brochure by B N. L Development Corporation which stated the property could be used for office buildings� multi-far�ily� warehousing, industrial potentia�, eic. Mr. Harris said they had �wo different stories from B N L and Eurlington Northern, Mr. Brokopp stated that the prima:y concern was for establishing industry along their-lines of growth. He stated that the I,and Development Corporation was formed to handle some of the lands that weren't perhaps compatible for either industrial or for operative. 1�L. Brokopp explained that they did get into a cross over on this pariicuiar property because there were some axeas like this Georgeto�m site that could be used better�for the motel operation than for the industrial operation. He said they had finally deter- mined that the Georgetokn site was better £or a motel and they were willing to go that route, and t:�e.rest they felt should be developed industrial. He added that they felt that anyihin� al�ng rails should not �o any other way unless some circumstances dictated other�aise. He said, hot�ever, they did have to think of what was economically best and if it was found that perhaps an apartment complex would be financially beneficial, they would be back before the City asking for that. However, he said� at the moment their primary ' Plannin Commission i�leetin 7 D g g- December 8, 1976 Page 5 � C� concern was for industrial development of that property. Chairperson Harris said they understood that, but the railroaci should under- stand the City�s position. He stated if the City tras to operate under those circumstances just described, they would get into a mishmash of zoning that � would borderline spot rezoning. He s aid that from his standpoint he agreed with the Georgeto�+,m concept along the hightJay and the industrial back� but a strip of commercial, a strip of multi-family, a strip of industrial and then another strip o£ commercial was not good planning. He said he saw � nothing but headaches as far as traffic patterns, utilities, and getting , ,along with the adjoining residen�Ls.. � � NIr. Boardman pointed out it was the City's prerogative to requests for rezoning if it did not follovr U;hat they fe�.t process. Chairperson Harris said that taas correct, but h should be stated at the onset of the development. turn down any future was a normal felt these things 2�lrr. Brokvpp stated this was a desirable property for industrial developmen�� and the only reason they hadn't developed �•iain Street property was because they •�rere waiting to see how the Northtown yard turned out. He said they_had . discussed how a motel would be compatible �rith industrial property, and had � noted that the property itself iaasn�t too visable from the interstate. He � explained that Holiday Village shielded most of it, and people were too -� intent on driving through ths underpass to pay riuch attention to it. He'�• stated that if the motel was located there and people had the chance to � swing into the motel, there would be a lot of people that wou.ld be influential in the industrial development of the area. Fie added that once they got into the area there could be more developrnent, and one development could lend � itself to another development, P�Lr. Brokopp added that they looked at it in the vein that the motel would add to the development of the industrial property, and if industries did get in there the salesmen would possibly be having their meetings at the motel, etc. He said that normally they wouldn�t , ask for rezoning away from industrial, but they were trying to be as honest and forthright as possible. � r � LJ � Mr. Ken TJielson.of Burlington Northern Land Development Corporation stated that what the Commission had heard so far was the Burlington Aorthern's viewpoint of what the property was to be used for. He stated the vote was not in on rahat the remainder of the property would be utilized for. rir. Nielson said that surely the Commission could understand that Burlington Northern's Industrial Development wanted to protect everything along the rails, and he thought that tiras understandable from the s.tandpoint it was getting harder and harder to locate good property �rithin a respectable proximity of the metropolitan area on which to locate industry. He stated that he thought their industrial development in Fridley so far had been of good quality; but from a cor�orate standpoint, looking at all the facets of the problem, they felt it also had potential for use as commercial, office, �rarehousing, multi-family, etc. He stated that based on their ability to come forth with a proposal. and submit it to the Board of Directors, this property could be available to B N. L Devel- opment for other uses besides industrial. � Plannin� Commission Meeting - December 8, 1976 Page 6 � E � � � � � � � � �-,i �i ,� � Nlr. Nielson stat�d that he didn't think that any of the representatives present would suggest tnat they intermingle land uses along rtain Street such as having cor�mercial, industrial and sticking in a few multi-family units. He said � they thought it �ras an area that was sensitive and had a number of uses. He stated that on their property betVreen 61st and 69� they had multi-family, single-family and commercia2 all within that area; and he thought the key ingredient was how these land uses interfaced. Mr. Nielson stated he didn�t think that what they were proposing as far as the motel was spot zoning� and B N I, looked at this as the first step in obtaining the highest and best use of the property. He explained that B�? L was in competition with Burlington Nor�thern�s Industrial DevelopMent Department in finding a use for the property and finding a developer. Chairperson Harris asked if i�ir, Nielson felt that all of the potentia]. uses he had listed in the brochure were compatible zoning for the area, and rTr. Nielson replied there was no firm development for the land.• He stated the data shee-t.s were just trying to generate interest, and they didn't like to come in and go with a piecemeal development step by step. rir. Nielson said that the probler� was here the Industrial Development Department didn't like to part with industrial.land in locations such as this because i� was of prime concern to theri, and they were reluctant to give B N L more than they needed in an initial first step. He stated they. would be making a cohesive effort to have a logical and harmonious usage along Main Street. ` Mr. Langenfeld said that as far as a business standpoint was concerned and in reference to the two brochures (one light industrial and one general business type zoning), he got the irnpression that �;hichever one sold k*ould be the one to go, and then they r�ould be back before the Planning Commission asking for the necessary zoning at that time. rir. Brokopp said it was al.ready zoned for industrial development, so they wouldn't have to come back before the Planning Coruaission if it went industrial. He said it would be just in the event they weren�t able to locate in3ustry there and B�?: L was able to locate some commercial development. Mr. Boardman asked if proposals by B N L had to be reviewed by Burlington � Northern before they would lease that property, and PTr. Brokopp replied yes, Burlington Northern would have the fixst directive as to what the property would be used for. � ' � � � � C� Chairperson Harris asked if they were selling any portion of this particular tract. Mr. Brokopp replied they didn't like to sell it, they preferred to lease, but the Vray financing was these days they had to sell. He explained it was difficult for them to get a financer for a term lease. P�Sr. Harris asked how the road situation and utilities would be handled in the event they did not sell, but leased the rest of the property. Pir. Brokopp said that was what they were trying to come up with now, but it was difficult to plan because they ti,rere not sure about the bridge over 69?� and all-the other things involved. He stated they had been trying to get the plat completed that 4ras agreed upon at the time of the Northtown yard initial construction. iie added they had b=en trying to get the thing platted, but the City asked questions about what they were going to do with the property behind what they wan�;ed to plat and the railraod couldn't answer that yet. , � � � � � �� r �� ' � � � � � � Planning Commission Meeting - December B, 1976 � Page 7 Chairperson Harris asked ho�r the utilities and the internal roadway system for the motel would be handled if the City looked favorably on the rezoning for Georgetown. Mr. George answered that they had t4ro entries off of Main Street. He s aid they knew where the seV;er was and had gone over this with rir. Clark's office, and had been over the power set up with the power compzny as far as transformer.� and would have total electric heating. Mr. George said that with the proper engineering and inspection they could put the sewer in themselves--building those lines and maintaining them, ar�' they would belong to the City. He said they would be in the puolic right-of-way. Nlr. Harris asked about going back into the property it�elf, and P�s. George replied ihey would build those lines thernselves and maintain them. He said they intended to run the sewer line into the right-of-way and along the 4Jest . side of P4ain Street to the buildings themselves, and then go from there back into the property with the sewer system they �rould need to give the sewage system to all the buildings. He said it �rould be the same thing with the water system. Mr. George added they Urere all set with the power company, and the electrical system was all engineered. He stated the only thing they might use gas for was the laundry system, but they could also go electrical. He said the rest would be all electrical. Chairperson Harris asked about the road sys�tem in this particular parcel in the event that they found some other users and leased the land to them. Mr.. Oleson said that most of their inquiries started around five acres plus, so it was very feasible it could go for ane project on one five acre parcel. rlr. Brokopp stated they would come up with a plan, but it depended on �inat came along. He stated they weren�t going to do anfthing that would get haphazard� but would get with I�ir. Boardman and work out a plan that t�rould be acceptable. , I�ir. Langenfeld asked what the minimum term for a lease agreement was� and rir. Brokopp replied that generally they were cancellable on_thirty days notice. He added that the term could be from five years to fifteen or t�renty. Mr. Langenfeld asked if there were any kind of clauses in the agreements which would give them the right to suddenly decide that they needed the property for their own uses. Mr. Brokopp said that there zaere times when they did need the property--it didn�t happen very often, but it could. Mr. Bergman stated that he felt a little concerned that this process was a bit different from the norm in that it seemed Mr. George had a plan to build a particular facility on a piece of property, and thi.s requires a rezoning in order for him to do so, rather than a r•ezoning coming prior to a specific building plan. He stated they 4�ere talking about a property oTaner�s request to rezone the property, and was wondering i�hat elements were yet incomplete prior to the actuality of the construction oi the notel. I�Ir. George stated that it had been worked out so the property could be transferred to B N I, who could give a long-term lease which ttiey needed for financing. He said all the items had been worked out for long-term leasing, and it ��ould be about a 25-year lease. He added it had been a�reed upon bet�.�een the Legal Department of B N L and Burlin�ton Northern's attorney, and the investors were all set, so there was nothin� that �•ras left to chance. rir. George stated the feasibility studies had been run and the si.te plan had been made. 7F � Planning Commission tleeting -- December'II, 1976 Page 8 7 G � tir. George stated that in a lot of situations the rezoning request would be made prior to all of this expense, but they felt they couldn't do that on � this one. He said they felt everythinb had to be c•rorked out prior to them coming before the Planning Commission and asking i'or the rezoning. � � Mr. Bergman asked if he was saying they had a long-term lease signed by both parties and a financing document signed subject to rezoning approval. Mr. George replied ihat was correct; the documents.t•rere made and approved and were just subject to rezoning. � r10TI0N by Shea, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission c].os� 1 the Public Hearing on Rezon�ng Request ZOA �76-06 by Georgetwon riotel, Inc. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, Chairperson Harris declared the Pu.blic Hearing closed at 8:35 P.M. � � � i r � Mrs. Schnabel said that since she wasn�t at the last meeting her lrnowledge of what preceded �ras basically what came +�hroagh the minutes, and she was a little up in the air as to what precisely tney wished to do this evening. She said she assumed they wanted to act on the request for rezoning, but beyond that in terMS of the rest of the property, she LJc'%..S F�ondering if the Commission felt they wanted to take some other action. Chairperson Haxris said he didn't lrnow if they could really do anything about the rest o�' the property, but they had wanted to talk to representatives from B N_ L and BurJ.ington Northern to get their thoughts. rir. Langenfeld commented that they had wanted to see if there was some comprehensive plan so they would at lease have a general idea of what was going to happen. I�Irs. Schnabel said it appeared that their intent was that they always intended it to be zoned heavy industrial and they still do. She added she thought it would be difiicult for the Commission to make a recomr:iendation or do anything other than act on the request that was before them tonight•. _ Chairperson Harris said that was correct. � Mr. Langenfeld said he i3anted to thank the people from Burlington Pi�rthern � for coming in, and he could see that they did have a plan to establish a trend Frhen they started the Georgetot•m project. He said he wished to make one correction, and�noted that it had bee:c indicated in this evening's � discussion that salesmen might be having meetings at the proposed motel when Mr. George had indicated at the previous meeting that there wouldntt be any meeting rooms or convention rooms. � i � � � MO TION by Langenfeld, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Comrlission recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning Request, ZOA �76-06, by Georgetown P�Iotel, Inc.: Rezone from I•i-?_ (heavy industrial areas) to C-2 (general business areas), that part of Lot 2, A.S. �{7B, lying tidesterly of the �•7esterly right-of-way line of ASain Street N.E., lying Easterly of the Easterly railway ri�ht-of-way line of Burlington Northern, Tnc., lying Northerly of the I�ortherly ri�;ht-of-w�y line of Interstaie Highw•ay #691�� and lying Southerly of a line drawn Westerly at a right an�;le to the �ast line of said Lot 2� from a point on said East line distant 507.60 feet Southerly from the Plortheast corner of said Lot 2, except the ti•Jesterly 21f3.16 of the described property, subject to easement to Northern States Power Company, the same being �600 Main Street N.E. � 7H Planning Commission I•leetin� - December 8, 1976 Page 9 � Chair erson Harris said he �rished to make a statement at this oint. He P p said he hoped that before any further advertisements were sent out on � Burlington Northern land and before a sign was put up advertising the property� that ihey could stop in and take a look at the comprehensive plan a.nd get a feeling of the City as to the direction the City would like � to head on that particular parcel. He said he spoke to the particular flyer which alluded to the site along East River Road and the proposed � development which stated "suitable for strip commercial, office business, � restaurant and multi-family use." Mr. Harris cor�mented that he did not feel that all of those proposed uses were really compatible taith the area. He � said he felt that before a sign was put up some of the rail�oad. representa- tives should stop in for a c:hat with City Administration and get a consensus � of opinion. Mrs. Schnabel said that she was a bit concerned about the traffic patterns. � She noted that as this area developed the City should address the traffic flow problem as k•ell as working �rith the o�mers oi the property. She stated she �ras specifically concerned that they avoid the type of situation they , had on East River Road now where property was sold or rented to a couple of commercial ventures, and they had a real.traffic hazard. rlrs. Schnabel said she could see the same thing happening in this area because it was fairly landlocked by residential areas and she would very much like to see the City � address this problem as well as the property owners, and the time to do this was now--before it was too far developed. Chairperson Harris stated they had discussed the traffic patterns at some length at the previous meeting, 1 including how the people would get there, from what direction they would come, the typz of clientele, etc. Mrs. Schnabel said she understood that but was not concerned with just the traffic generated from the motel but was , talking about the entire area as it started to develap. She pointed out that right now there were only two funnels of traffic out to University Avenue, a.nd suggested an alternative plan be made or another access to the axea. Mr. Harris pointed out that no one knew what was going to happen-- � not Burlington Northern, B N L or the City. He said it could be one large development or five developments of one acre apiece, so they didn't know how much traffic would be generated. Mrs. Schnabel said she agreed, but they � had the same problem before and now they had a serious traffic problem as a result of it. . � rir. Bergman said he wished to comment that it had been gratifying to listen to the representatives from Burlington explain that they had been doing a 1ot of thinking and planning the best theYCOUld, and they were concerned about � it. He stated he felt they had a good exchange and he appreciated their thoughts and statements. � Tir. Brokopp said he would like to say one more thing concerning the develop- ment of streets. He said that was some�n�hat of a problem because the minute they planned the street and layed it out, then they found somebody carne along and wanted that street area. He explained that in the plat for the industrial � eenter where ti;icnes and those people Vrere, they created street areas but they didn't dedicate street areas. i�e said they gave the streets outlot numbers for each projected street area, and when Pl,ytiaood rlinnesota went in ' that taas immediately dedicated to the City for street purposes. Mr. Brokopp stated that the next year the road that �•�ent from tiie entry of the development ' � Planning Commission t-ieeting - December 8, 19?6 Page 10 7 r � , , , � C� � � ' , r � � � � ' , to F�iC and around the pump house was dedicated to the C�ty. He further explained that Iast year when Sylvania went in they dedicated that street, so now if someone came in and t�anted th� entire remainder of that property where there were streets projected but not dedicated they could lump all the outlots together and have one big piece that was served by roadways. PQr. Brokopp said that was sort of what they were envisioning here; they were trying to develop a plan that would set up the same type of thing. He added they had agreed with the City there would be an entry at 57th. Mr. Langenfeld stated that if they came up with a development plan, the City would certainly like to see it. A7r. Brokopp stated that he had talked with Nir. Sobeich and they were t�ying to get something to him. UPON A VOICE V03'E, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REZOATING RE!�UEST ZOA ,�76-07 BY ROBF�i.T A. SCHROER: Reaone I,ots ,, 7 and � Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, from h1-2 (heavy industrial areas) to Pf-1 (light industrial areas)� located between 77th Avenue and 79th Avenue Pd.E. on the East side of- Rancherts Road N.E. r4r. Robert Schroer; t�r. Jerry Paschke; and r�r. Jim Benson, representing rir. Paschke, were present. � ILZOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing on Rezoning Request ZOA ,�76-07 by Robert A.. Schroer. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairperson Harris declared the PubZic Hearing open at 8:53. . • � A�ir. Boardman showed the Commission"a plat plan for the buildings that axe being dzveloped in the Onaway Area. He pointed out the four lots that were in question and explained they �aere presently zaned M-2 but i•Tr. Schroer wished them to be aoned �-I-1. He explained the rest of the property was presently zoned C-2. Mr. Schroer explained that one reason they ioanted to change to ri-1 �ras because they had a potential buyer for four parcels of property. He said there was a more limited building construction in a 2�4-1 than a hi-2, so he didn't think it would hinder the area. He said he had the builder and the real estate man with him to help answer any questions. t�ir. Boardman said he thought there had previously been some concern as to what Vrould happen in this area as far as road layouts, etc. He said the City did have road easement in this area for development of these commercial properties. He said he had talked to i�Ir. Schroer a fet,r days ago as to how that would best be developed, and he had suggested a cul-de-sac to serve the interior properties. Ttr. Boardman said that at that time he felt that maybe the best way would be to keep this as a commercial-type development with that type of a service road in there. He explained that if they put in a cul-de-sac off of Rancher's Road, it would pretty much eliMinate any practical commercial use other than maybe an office facility, and also mi�ht predicate a rezoning 1 , � ' , � � , ' , ' , , � ' � , ' ' Plannin� Commission t�9eeting - pecember 8, 1976 Page 11 request to an industrial-type develop�ent. Mr. 5chroer explained that when the plat was layed out in '70 or �71 there was an error (he pointed it out on the plat), and it had been diScussed by himself, rs. Boardman and 2-�r. Sobeich. He explained that because of that error they taere thinking about the cul-de-sac, and the cul-de-sac could serve the same purpose as the service road, but he wasn't opposed to either way. rLr. Bergman asked if lots 1 through 8 were all presently undeveloped, and Mr. Schroer said that �ras correct. Mr. Boardman said there was also t!� possibility of expansion by Datsun. He added that he thought at this time, and depending on the type of layout that went in there, he wouZd prefer to see it remain commercial rather than see any o� it go to industrial. He said that the difference between heavy industrial (r1-2) and light industrial (r1-1) was that the iv1-2 properties were required on an acre and a half and tend to go to an ownership-type operation. He said that the requirements on ri-1 properties V�ere half what they were on i�i-2, and they tended to be smaller buildings. He said they also attracted growing operations that needed a place to go to for awhile until they out- grew it. Mr. Boardman said they trould prefer it to stay ri-2 to get the type of industry that was developing across the street. r;r. Bergman asked about the al7.owable uses on M-2 and M-l� and Mr. Boardman replied the uses were quite similar. He said that some uses in M-2 were not allo�red in 2•i-1, such as very heavy manufacturing. rlr. Schroer said that i�i-2 did allow outdoor storage and i•1-1 did not, and P�Ir. Boaxdrian commented that on I•i-2 you could not have outside storage without screening. •Mr. Jim Bensan of Thorpe Brothers stated he was representing Pir. Paschke, and informed the Corunission that P•ir. Paschke had built ten buildings in the Ona�aay Area and only one was a lease building. He stated that all the buildings irere well-kept and Mr. Paschke had brought in people �rho were long-term businesses and good business enterprises. He said that out of all the buildings that Mr. Paschke had built there was only one that had any blight around it, an.d �there the oVmer should be given stricter control. Mr. Benson stated that the people that were attracted to this area were small, growing companies, and the markei was for small buildings. He said the �irst two proposed buildings would be 12,325 sq. feet each, and TZr. Paschke was developing to a 357 density instead of the �t0o allo�aed by code. rSr. Benson said that Mr. Paschke had changed the look of his buildings to almost comr�ercial-looking, and they would not look like industrial factories. He shohed photographs to the Corvnission, and summed up by saying that this was an opportunity for Mr. Paschke to r�eet all the codes, ask for no_ variances, and develop rlr. Schroer's land. I�1r. Bergrnan asked what tYie actual reason ti�as for the rezoning request. He asked if it wasn't true that anything r;r. Scliroer could build in a. M-1 could also be built iri a?�i-?.. A1r. Boardr�an replied that the rezoning request was because the type of buildings I�Ir. Paschke wanted to build he wanted to split. Mr. Boardman explained he tranted to have separate oknerships on the buildings, 7J L _J � , � � ' � ' Plannin� Commission Meeting - December $, 1976 Page 12 and in order to reduce the lot area to three quarters of an acre it was necessary to zone it down to M-1. P-Ir. Be�rgman commented that then he wanted the flexibility of being able to put in a lo.�er square footage tenant and �et better density than he could if it remained M-2. A1r. Boardman said that was correct, as for :-f-2 they would have to have an acre and a half per o��rner- ship. rir. Benson commented that there weren't any 2l�,00� square foot buildings in the whole area, and the market was in the 10 -- 12,000 square foot range. He added that he thought if it was left as ri-2 Mr. Paschke would have to pass and look for another area as he would not go out and build a 24,000 square foot building on pure. speculation. 1•1r. Bergman said that rrith an industrial building, �'requently the building got built to a large size with flexibility to subdivide the buildin� to bring in customers of smaller sizes. rlr. Benson asked if he was eluding to the L�0,000 square foot buil.ding with ten bays of �t,000 square feet each. He said that contractors used to build small buildings, but in about 19b9 small buildings becane uneconomical to build so contractors started builda.ng what they called multi-tenant buildings. r1r. Benson said that people have been leasing these buildings since 1969 and now they are tired of having ten companies in one building, they see the rent being poured do�m the drain and no equity built up, and they have not been able to take advantage of. depreciation so they were coming out of these buildings. He stated that these people were now looking for small buildings as they had no control over the parking lot in the multi-tenant buildings or the lati,rn being moti�ed, and they wanted pride of oT�rnership and their oc,rn name over the front door. , Hirs. Schnabel commented that in i�1-1 and ti-2 raw materials could be siored outside the building if they were totally screened. She as�ced T�r. Schroer if the intent of the rezoning request was to sell the entire strip of land. , or to lease it, and he replied that i�4r. Paschke had options on the entire parcel of properties. � � CJ 1•7r. Boardman stated that one thing that should be considered somewhat on this was the layout of the entire section, and what would be the best way to develop tnis as far as road patterns in the area. Mrs. Schnabel said that brought up another question. She said that if they were considering going off of Rancher's Road and cul-de-sacing, was that plan predicated on the sale of this? She asked if they were going to dedicate land for doing this before they sold the existing properties they had now. Mr. Schroer answered that it would be dedicated before they sold. 1'�ir. Boardman said that a lot of this may depend on if Datsun wanted that 1 back property, because if Datsun wanted that property there would be no reason for putting a cul-de-sac in that particular area. rirs. Schnabel asked if that �aas done and the property had to be reducec�, if they would � still be within the 3/1� size for an T�1-1 zone. r;r. Schroer said he believed so, and Mr. Boardrian corrunented that they r,�ould have to be. ' , � �lr. Bergman stated that the street pattern had been discussed at a previous Planning Comriissi,on meeting, and asked if they hadn't gotten involved in a dedication at that tiMe. I�Ir. Boardman pointed out on the plat the 50' and 30' that had been dedicated, and P•ir. Bergman com,mented that he thought they 7 r, ' Planning Commission Meeting - December 8� 1976 �J� � ' � . �_� r_ 1 � � ' Page 13 7 L had covered this subject once as far as their thoughts toward street patterns.. Mr. Boardman wondered if this was what they wanted or if a cul-de-sac pattern would be more feasible. Mr. Schroer stated that he thought it would depend on what went in there, and i�tr. Berg�an agreed that might be the qualifying factor. Nir. Schroer said that they had discussed the cul-de-sac, and rlr. Paschke was not opposed to it. Mr. Boardman said he thought he would like to see a more substantial commer- cial development, rather than a strip right up the line with frontage on University; and maybe a secondary commercial development within that area. He stated he felt that would be more in keeping with the total comprehensive plan. Mrs. Schnabel said that she didn't know if Mr. Paschke was planning to make any of the parking areas joint parking lots, assuming he bought �he entire strip. She stated that certainly a.street going through there would have some affect on his plans� also. Nir. Paschke said he had no plans for joint parking, as he didnit think they would need it. � MOTION by Bergm2n, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Coznmission close the Public Hearing on Rezoning Request ZOA #76-07 by Robert A. Schroer. Upon a voice vote, all voting a,ye, Chairperson Harris declared the Public Hearing closed at 9:25. Mr. Langenfeld noted that no fee �,ras listed on the rezoning request, and r1r. Boardman said there was a$155 fee, which had been paid. Mr. Bergman stated he had the impression that the property owner apparently had planning substantiation for the rezoning request and he felt no quarx•sl between a transition from NI-2 to M-1 to C-2S. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning Request ZOA #76-07 by Robert A. Schroer: Rezone Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addztion, from 1�1-2 (heavy industrial areas) to P�i-1 (light industrial areas), located bettreen ?7th Avenue and 79th Avenue N.E. on the East side of Rancher's Road N.E. • Mrs. Schnabel noted that r1r. Boardman had stat�d earlier that he tended to feel this should remain Pi-2 zoning, and asked if other than the concern for the nature of the oivnership if there were any other concerns. t�Ir. Boardr.�an replied that generally smaller buildings were built in a M-2 zone i,ritn the idea of passible room for expansion. Fie said that with TS-1 there usually wasn't room for expansion, so if their business expanded there usually started to be outside storage and parking lots started to be used for storing materials, etc. He said that this was generally the type of situation they saw in the Onaway Area. 1�irs. Schnabel asked if the City had given any thought to an overall.plan for that one strip of� lots five throu�h S in terms of i ts coiapatibility ��ith the �raperty across Rancher�s Road to the West. 1•ir. Boardman said he thought it was cornpatible use; M-1 and NI-2 usually did get along as far as uses of � Planning Carunission Ateeting - December 8, 1976 � Page l� 7 M , ' ' r , � ' ' � , , , � LJ , , ' ' property went. He said he thought he would prefer that where they did have an opgortunity to develop on a larger parcel of property where•there was a possibility for expansion on that property, that they go to .that type of • development. He stated he didn't have any quarrel with the design of Mr. Paschke's buildings; he thought rSr. Paschke did a good job and in most cases his tenants were good tenants. Nir. Boardman said anot,.ier thing about this was there F�as no room on these pr�perties for outside material screening. He said the property was pretty much taken up by the building and the parking lot, and when materials started moving outside there was just no room for screening. . ' I�irs. Schziabel asked if it was ,just coincid�nce that one section appeared to be quite well developed and�the other portion didn't seem to have very �rtuch. N'r. Boardman explained this �rras because of soil conditions. Mrs. Schnabel said she was just curious because obviously there hadn't been a problem developing with I��-2. Mr. Bergman stated that he �ras feeling just a bit uncomfortable with some of this discussion. He said he ��ras not sure he could accept that a change in zoning from M-2 to 2�;-1 ti�rould result in all the differences that had been described. Mr. Langenfeld stated he could see what i�Ir. Bergman was getting at. He said that they i�e.re saying in an i�I-1 there wasn't room for expansion, so now they were going to go to a smaller.type structure with room to expand, but eventually that structure t�rould expand and reach the same category as the P�I-I. NIr. Bergrnan said he was confused by 2�Ir. Langenfeld� corunent� arid Chairperson Harris said he understood what Prlr. Langenfeld was driving at but it got confusing because sametimes they were saying i�i-1 when they meant r1-2, and vice-versa. r1r. ?-Iarris explained that if a given company was to move into a building of 12,000 square feet and they expanded to their. maximu.m limit of �lt,000 square feet, at some point in time all of a sudden 2l�,0�0 square feet would no longer be large enough for therri and you were right back where you started. i�Ir. Boardman. comriented that there Vrould be roorr� for outside storage instead of just parking and building. Tir. Bergman stated that the key distinction he gathered bet:,reen the two zoning categories was the prop�rty owners arid developer's industrial market input concluding there is a market for industrial buyers for ownership of a limited-size building, and they want to be able to get within that limited size. Chairperson Iiarris said that it was much easier to sell or lease a 12,000 square foot buildii7g than a 2li,000 square foot building. He stated.that the problem that had arisen in the area with the acre and a half lots was that the people who had buil.t there were not efficiently using their land; if some of those companies were to expand they would have a great deal of . difficulty as there was no place for thern to go. He stated that tho things entered in: land costs and land preparation costs.. rir. Harris said that if the land was purchased when 2�Ir. Schroer could afford to be more reasonab7.e� then the buyer could afford to put a smal.ler building on that many square feet of land. Eie acided that those particular si.tes that are built on now are on pretty reasonably solid ground, so consequently a builder could afford � Planning Commission t�leeting - December E3, 1976 Page 15 %{�� u ' � to go with a smaller building. A1r. Harris said that or. the East side of Rancher�s Road the soil condition �•ras such that land preparation was going to be expensive and also because land costs were higher. � �ir. Langenfeld asked if there was any problem trith drainage, easements� etc.� and Mr. Boardr�an replied there was no problem. UPON A VOICE VOTE, Bergman, Langenfeld, Schnabel and Shea voting aye and Harris abstaining, the motion carried. Chairperson Harris stated his reason for abstaining was because he was a properiy owner within the area and would be, affected by this. 3. LOT SPLIT RE�UEST: L.S. #76-11 BY ROBERT A. SCHROER: Split off the , Southerly 1 0 feet of Lot , Block 2, �,ast Rancn Estates 2nd Addition, to make two building sites, the same being 7875 and 7895 Rancher's Road N.E. ' � ,r � li ' ' � ' � ' � ' ' Mr. Robert Schroer, Mr. Jerry Paschke, and 2•7r. Jim Benson Vrere present. Mr. Boardman showed the properties referred to in the lot split to the Com-nission and stated the lot split kould predicate two oi,merships for the development of the building. He explained the lot split would be at the line that would go right bett�een the buildings, so there would be a back to back wall («0" lot line). He said he had originally suggested that the entire thing be shifted 15�, but by doing that it k�ould make the lot size smal.ler than the 3/!� acre. He added that this �•rould be consistent with M-1 zoning, and each one was somewhat over 3/!� acre. I�;r. Boardman stated that the square footage needed was 32,670' and there V�as 3�t,655 actual, so it w�.s in accordance with �rhat was required. He added that he would still like to see this shifted somewhat to pick up more green around, but it woul.d meet the zoning code the way it was set up. There followed some discussion on various ways to shift this to get more green area, but Nir. Paschke pointed out that the way it was there �tirould he room for more paxking if it was required, but if it was shifted there wouldn't be. He said tnai the w�}r it sat they could come within 5� of the property line, and r1r. Board- man said he agreed with the points taken. Chairperson Harri.s asked how the�r were going to get the utilities in, and Mr. Schroer replied that the utilities were in. Mrs. Schnabel said she would like to lmow if the entire lot 8 was goin� to be sold to one party or if just the Northerly half was going to be sold at this time and the Southerly half not sold if this lot split was approved. Mr. Paschke said that he ��rould buy the entire lot 8 and develop the build- ing, and he may have two oc,rners or possibly one. A?rs. Schnabel said her concern r�ras building on �he "0" lot line and the problems that might arise with that if he was not going to buy the whole lot 8 at once. � Plannin Commission Meetin - December 8 1 6 � � , 97 , Page 16 ] 0 MOTIOAI by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the l�lanning Commission , recornmend to City Council approval of Lot Split Request L.S. �76-11 by Robert A. Schroer: Split off the Southerly 160 feet of Lot 8, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition, to make two building sites, the same being 7$75 and 7�'9S Rancher's Road 1d.E. Upon a voice vote, Bergman� � Langenfeld, Schna�el and Shea voting aye and Harris abstaining, the motion carried. Chairperson Harris stated his reason for abstaining was because he was a property owner within the area and would be afiected by this. Chairperson Harris declared a recess at 9:55 P.rT. and reconvened the meeting at 10: 15 P.M. � L�. VACATION RE�t3EST: SAV�76-07, CZTY OF FRIDL�L'Y: Vacate existing un- needed road�•:ay easement in consideration for additional roadway ease- r�ents being acquired, located on Lot 1�9, Revised Auditor�s Subdivision No. 77, generally located on Talmadge Lane and 75th SJay N.E. 1�Ir. Boardman directed the Comraission to turn to page 39 in their agendas, and shoi•red them the ttro areas where�.the Cit�• wanted to vacate road ease- ments they presently had. He explained that one iyas located on the revised Osborne :7ay and the other was where 75tYi ti�as dos,m by the St. Paul [aater •:?�yorks. He pointed out �ahere they rranted a 30' triangle dedicated and another area dedicated. Nir. Boardman stated they haci contacted St. Pua1 jJater Works and had gotten verbal agreements, and documents were being drat,m up for the exchange of easements. Mrs. Schnabel asked rir. Bo�rd.m?n if the City had reacted in any way to the request from the neighbors who live along 75th in regard to the drainage probler�, and he replied that that was supposed to be taken care of with the new Osborne Way. MOTIOAI by Schnabel, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Comriission recorunend to City Council t�e approval of Vacation Request SAV #76-07, by the City of Fridley: Vacate existing un-needed roadway easement in consideration for additional roadF�ay easements being acquired, located on Lot it9, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 77, generally located on Talmadge Lane and 75th tiJay N.E. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the raotion carried unanimously. 5. COPdTIP1UF� : PR�POSED P�iAINTENANCE CODI:: Iir. Boardman state3 that they had gone through �to a certain degree the direction that the Comcnission had g:iven last time. He explained the code had beei� revised and put into a certain order that tiras acceptable according to safety� health and appearance. He added that he was still goin� through it someirhat to check on the different property standards, F'r1A and that type of thing, rlr. Boardraan furtY�er explained he had an intern �orkin�; on this and �las just about ready to present it. 1 Planning Corunission P�leeting - December 8� 1976 1 ' u �' ' ' � Page 17 6. COIdTINUED : MTh1AN DEVELOPI�IENT GOALS �ND OBJECTIVPS PIr. Boardman inforned the Corrunission he had nothing further on this at the present time. 7. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATIOi1 COIvL�IISSION P4INUTFS : NOVET�'IBER 15 1976 MOTION by Shea, seconded by Schnabel, that the Planning Commission receive the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of November 15, 19?6. Mrs, Shea commented that she had noticed rlr. Langenfeld had requested that the initials be clarified, and they weren't. She said she would appreciate �hat alsoe Hir. Langenfeld stated that he had read about the East River Road project under New Business and he wished it to go on record that Jan Seeger was the only one who spoke up in behalf of the idea. UPON A VOICE VOTE, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 8. RECEZVE ENVIROP1r1EA1TAL QUALITY C0� i, TISSIOPd rfINUTES : NOVEI��fft lb, 1976 - ' Mr. Las-igenfeld said he would like to ma'.�ce a couple of corrections, and pointed out the last sentence in the first paragrapr� on page 57 should read "environment and industxy" instead of "industry and industry". He stated he also wished to bring up that the conversation referred to in ' the first paragraph on page 55 was not his conversation with !Jalt Starwalt, but this took place with the Chairman of the Project Comrlittee during a City Council meeting. ' � , , ' P•10TION by Langenfeld, seconded by Bergman, that the Pla�ning Comriission receive the E�vironmental Quality Cor�-nission minutes of Nover,lber 16, 1976. Mr. Boardman noted that there had been some discussion under the �.hviron- mental Education Program concerning the IIzvironmental Commission trying to get review power over the budget for the naturalist. He said that any- thing other than discussion on that topic, such as a motion, t,rould be out of the scope of the ordinance that was established for the E1lvironmental Commission. P•�r. Langenfeld said he had one other correction, and stated that on page 55, the seventh sentence should read "He said he believed these goals and objectives had an environmental impact that involved the entire City��. The ��ord "statement'� should be elir�inated. ' Chairperson Harris said he was wonderin� about the mi,ning ordinance, and where they were on that. PIr. I,angenfeld said they had instz�ucted the City to use the model ordinance from rletro Council and incorporate the needed environmental aspects of that into an ordinance that could be drawn up by ' the City and the J�vironmental Quality Corcunission would review it. Right n � ?P , �� u I�� ' C � ' ' 1 , � � � ' , , '�, , �' I'lanning Co:�,�nission Meeting - December 8, 1976 Page 18 i�ow, he said, the permit they use for Mining was the only governing instru- ment as far as restricting any unnecessary mining. i•ir. Boardman inforraed the Commission that at this time they had issued two permits on it, and since that time had issued a tag to one of the operators who was to have had an appearance in court today. He explained that the City had told him in a letter that if the debris continued he would be jeopardizing nis permit. rlr. Boardman stated that they had not issued a permit to Chives at this time, and said they were applying to Anoka County for a clean der►olition land fill in the area. Mr. Boardman said he had talked to Boo Hutchinson on this and he thought they would make a recommenda- tion to A.neka Countg that this application be denied. He sxplained they did have several problems wi.th Chives' property that they intended to get into when they reviet•red it according to the model ordinance. rir. Langenfeld said that if the members of the Commission were interested in more specific answers to this question, they could be found in the last two motions on page 51. He explained that they would like to see the ordin- ance in concurrence with the permit. P•;r. Boardman said they had the power to do thi:s through the ordinance they presently had in the application process, as there t.Tas a statement in that application for stipulations that allowed so;�e flexibility with Staff to issue stipulations on the property. He added that most of the applications were pretty and cut and dried. Chairperson Harris asked if the permit that was issued to I�tinnesota Transfer was issued to t�linnesota Transfer or to their subcontractors. rir. Boardman replied it had been issued to their contractor. P�r.�Harris said that as long as they were talking about this, he would like to throw out an idea and get the Commission's thoughts on it. He stated that for years and years everybody said peat iaas a nasty substance and tried to get rid of it, but in the past fe�a years it hadn't worked out that way.. All of a sudden, he said, it got fluffed up and called black dirt and was sold for a tremendous price. He stated tnat our neighbors to the Nor•th on the Iron Range had a corunodity they sold called taconite, and they taxed it, and he was wondering about having a black dirt tax. Mr. Boardman asked for what purpose, and I�ir. Harris replied to help defray the costs of administrating the ordinance and it also migilt be a good way of pumping a little money into the park capital budget. I�Ir. BoardMan said they were not supposed to have anything over that permit fee, but I�1r. Harris pointed out that the iron mining conpanies were paying millions of dollars and they ran their school districts off of it. He asked tahy they couldn't use the same rationale on taxing black dirt in Fridley to help capitalize the park improvement plan, and said it would be the same as taxing any other minable product, tir. Boardman said he didn't know i�rhat the state tax laws said concerning this. l�irs. Shea suggested directing. Staff to look into th�s. UPON A VOICE VOTE, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1�Ir. Langen.feld said he wished to make a couple of statements in regard to the F�vironmental Commission. He noted that many negative feelings and ideas c a��e out fram these various meetings and Project Cornmittee meetings. He 7Q � �'' �I ' , � � � �J ' Planning Commission rieeting - December 8, 1976 pa�e �9 stated �hat the ultimate goal was for the overall betterment of the City and yet here and there they were being accused oi violating a charter, and he didn't think they were. He also said that the East River Road Project Com�nittee had been termed as an"interest " group, when it wasn�t intended to be so. tie said that he thouoht some of the Commissiori members were familiar with the onslought of citizens from East River Road that came in about 1968 and kePt tne City Counci.l busy for rnany meetings, and at least they had accomplished that no:a the citizens were discussing their problems with the Project Committee, who discussed it with the Fridley �hvironmen�al Commission, and in turn it was discussed at the Planning Commission. He said that the citizens taere airirig out their feelings at these various meetingss and what took place was a good form of citizen input as well as a controlled-type meeting. rir. Langenfeld explained that they hoped to use East River Road as.a pilot type thing to go into problems of other roads, maybe extending to Highway 6�, etc. Mr. Langenfeld said he got a little uptight when he heaxd they were violating a charter. He stated that this �aas the very nature of the reason *ahy the ordinance was changed for citizen par�icipation, and he didn't think Ehvir- onmental should drop the ball just because otner Commissions did. He . explained that when people starte� talking about the environment, they were dealing with something a lot broader in scope than hockey, �ootball or a play. He stated that �virorunental was unique and different, and pe~�haps that t,ras why this Co.mr�ission was so grossly misunderstood at times. 9. RECEIVE APPEALS C0:^�IISSION 2�ITNUTES : PdOVr'�13ER 22 1976 MOTION by Schnabel, seconded by Shea, that the Ylanning Comrnission receive the Appeals Corru7ission minutes af November 22, 1976. Mrs. Schnabel s aid th� Commission might be interested to note that this , Vras intendsd to be a$It0,0�0 house and was on a 50' lot. She said it was a little shocking to find out what you could get for $40,000. Mr. Bergman corunented that he thought this meeting was more interesting than usual, ' and noted that i•irs. Schnabel had asked if there would be a garage and the builder expla�ned they �rould nat build one but would provide space for one. He noted that a refrigerator, dishtaasher and carpeting were included, and ' thought it i,ras interesting in view of a trade-off and what a person got instead of a garage. P�Irs. Schnabel agreed it iras revealing to find out �hat was included for $l�0,000. � Mr. Bergman said that this was an exaraple of trhat could be built for low and moderate income having not required a oara�;e. He noted that their choice could te $I�0,000 for an eleven hundred square foot neF� house, an appreciably lower cost for a five to ten year old house, or reriting. He stated there were all those options there and he thought�they had gotten themselves trapped into the fact that in pursuin� the objective of providing housing � for low and moderate incornes it h� tobe new, and had to be purchased instead of rented. He stated that in his opinion, a lo:�r or moderate income person still couldnjt afford to buy this particular house, and r:rs. Schnabel agreed. ' UPON A VOICE VOT�, ALL VOTING AYE, the rnotion carried unanimously. , 7R Planning Commission t�eeting - December B, 1976 Page 20 7S lo, oP�rr nrscusszorr ri0TI0P1 by Langenfeld, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission receive the letter addressed.to Councilrnan Fitzpatrick fror� George Fred- erick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. P4r. Bergman asked if this was from a private citizen� and Mr. Boardman answered it was. P�Ir. Boardman inforr►ed the Commission that there would be a meeting the following night in Coon Rapids on the Land Planning Act from Metropolitan Council. He said this would be one of the first seminars, and the City would have a Staff inember attending and the Planning Commission was invited to attend also. He added that there would be some discussion as to the funding sources. � � MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission. receive the memo fror� the City Attorney on Special Use Permits. Upon a voice vote, all voting �ye, the motion caxried unanimously. �Nlrs. Schnabel noted that this ��ras the memorandum the Appeals Cor�rnission wanted. ' P�rs. Schnabel said she had a request to make of the persons responsible for typing the minutes for the various meetinos. She noted that on the even-numbered pages the margins were run over so far that the last words were very difficult to read when the minutes were in the book, and as'.�ced that i•rider right-hand margins be used. Mr. Boardman said it was so noted. ADJOUP.NP�iENT : A�OTION by Bergman, seconded by Langenfeld, that the meeting be adjourned. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Harris declared the Planning Commission meeting of December 8, 1976 adjourned at 11:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Q�,/'�.rt/7'I.� ( ,/' .�/�"f'!%'i� ��.. � � Sherri 0'Donnell Recording Secretary .i�..�.._ . . . ... .. .._. . _ .. ._ . :_ ._ . _ ._ _ .. .�. ... . .. . � _�.w._....�._._.4..._.._..._......_.�. �...:.. ,�...:. .r.......� 7 T �;:�/ pp��♦ 'II�'�� - R3 T'^ V 1F•'��y* .. -:.. �' M.T-vm�.� ('�'�' �'• �'�. - -. .. .,. �I y t ►-%: �� - ■y �g T`:�� . {�n: �"�iV `�' ,. _ R.� ,. ..t,.,a �� . . � +��q:. '1 ;i.,• .1 '��'� .�° C-I C'�, . r, 9,�� 1 � . Jt... l ,'�4 .r �w,d., �i- : � �+ � ��% _ .. � � Fi 9 5 ` � � :+� 2 6 " .`,� � ,r, " . �' yE i. �� . v 9 ! � L w � '� k�s; ��' +,.i� ` ; � � 7 �`� j � ��,�/ � '�`• : � !� ; t � �: x,awaro,k „1.,J l �� ; , � 71 � i � w�+ .,i� �4 � . 1�' � � �i TI h�.�.-� � � t '_ x. �, �i�c .y�. a _..� IP �ii�. �a,�:$. '�� ` '� #".i �,��'., ,� ��• /Y 'j .-.Y 4'�� l..� L .^s/"6�k �.. �' �. Y ? . J . �`'...r.�_tJ�.. t!+ "... -� }' �i . .i�} � i l �! �(} � R4 F" ' y' � e rf �- , � � � iy ,� 4, y' . r�.iisRy�,. 4 5 ,, ,M . .. rd'r � . }�� 1 j�� . ..�j i� �. � � . � ,� ✓y � � � +�+; ' � � �� ` - r . k ! ,: v�,� { ...t. � b.�.ya i�.� i .y.. �� , r� ��.,�y k.� �l% ( .� �}-�.9 :i �� g ....: ` k � ' .., 6 . )� 1 /� � k � I i � S ' b �g �q . �• i ..� . � J X • ' }��. .ly . p��?% . . } �.i pa' S ;.T. �- �y , y ,�i i^�p: � i,+� 4� �� , _ (� + �'� �.�i ... �R' �� '� 3F � F �� 5 j'r Y, �,�, ��rt �ai�. ::�1'ii^'e � _ �.. � 1 ,3 . � `�� wt - �� ( ; � � y � 1 � � t .".l OJ y�rnhy,� -'� �� 1 �� 7 %' j�., R: � � � �.� 3 . Q ��i `° `�. . >r '.�� j � � ;�� , a r �, �� 1�! f I ct � ts ] �r � ; ( •�=.s � �K t �,� � � ��f �: �y: 7 kP'4t *" r ; �� i f .$..� i e...:q p .�.� } aA � �� r �i : �� .. !�� f`.: � id �: ' . t � � F :`� a:i � i - y �.. ._ � i ! � .�, � � . .. � .� . �. ' 4 .. a. � } �,,d / � �. � s � +` R :OT y 7 �..'.-. � ; ..�i � —,; � . : .�S - � � f. �. �. a r. v��.,:'S � u?' u z" ' !""' �-�� x� i. � �z . vac t _ �:� '` _ � � `� , � +� ;� � � ;� tx e' a '� � �i �'i' Jt ' . . - . � F .3 '� b I ��i �� .F s . � � � i 'J ' } �` 9 1� . - J � ' �I F j�} � E� � � �: .t � } j �, � � . � �q ;�. : -� �,,�t38�-.. � 5 t..,�'v; �' . � �T : -� `a �5- : i �,� � '"; ,; �,'£ � r t u3 `��• j yt. � . .. �c��'�,R . � _ a. ` '+!` ! �� ' .� h'Z y .� 6 ,a��rS e . �� .; � '4�� •� �� 4�� '9'n..v. � .♦r� r F : �, t �Y �..� `� � � � � .. ~ t t'� .. y ' . � � . � � a i S. � t '" _ F .� +f � .�� W ' t a � ��-`�, : -�`. t � > t �t ��.,�� a �ji ; }4� '� �r . C� ..,��..��5 UIbS�� c�(- �� _ � �` 4 �r � 'y .1 s. �� 7 . � i s y ' � � ;, � , � ,� : : t �,:..� -.:y�'r �:.� '�^� �-� ' �+. � ':.-� � ��"� L 1� a � �' ' �� '�rc 3� � e � . . � _ �. � 'f. � t +,� � � .'� e, � i: � � § �� 7+� ...�:� ,..'� � . . . : . . �a � � p��F F � ; � \ i i -.� � . � . yl � :;m� k i a�� . {? ;_ �.�; � .. F .. _ � � .. $'?�� 4 f.. +tiL:��. _ z�:• _, a �. ., � . ' - .. � .. . . a ._ � : .�!� �� .. . '7 � �`� y L i . �� ' ' ' .. .{ ' t S �'t � _' � i+c . - . � F' .. � � ' � + �, . , S , � ` � .� -y �, ��. ��g4�t g S ' � � p�. � , . 1 �� ;�.R _ ''ia �,a-._ . . � . �rct�(��P� t;� f � _ � z �;` _ . . . 4 �, 3 4 k ,� : � `� , � j t � -. ��'�i�y{ 4� ;�g., t j J } . � j f;.? �1 � . nA +TM `��.�y' �' } .-^k i 7 ' �+'1 k' �� ` � F } 4 t '� g � ° . . °�e°, F �, '\ � ? � �a T .� ` ( f��:.,. 4�;,� � , .. , � 6 � i '�, � ' d � i '��` ' 'i ..l f . .' : ��Af ; S � ,qF'. :'�.;Y "'i ii !� Y F - . � iri,i�.� l�r � gi.a . :QA� ��-.��,��}.. � i -. } � - � � � ' � .-. ��J� `'& t�t'�X! a� + t �r t � `� r j.eEaP.� ;T�i .��,� . �l! � `((�l''� . ' . r �� • _ � ,C� � r �°o�; j ?• k � ' Z ° �.. , fe 44 y § .' e, .�` ' "� � -,. .. � z �. ¢, 4 r aA i e � 9: .�� F- F s' t � 9 i1 � �'' . . v . � � � +Z; t �� •: ` ' � � ,Y� _. 4. G � 9 �y, 1 �t" '� f�' }�� j �3o s �� " yx "� �tis� t"i.�4: �� s. o� �� .sk�� t �� ' �, t: � � ' nOp; �� }° � �: z��. � �_ � r a ..' � p � � � �1 � ,�ti � - �• � �� rz � )i r`1 �i . 4. .a , �i. � i+ . ! �. 9 ?..,� � �.f e �r�:�� l �� .. } 1 i � *i`:' �, �_ i .. ,� -� , t ;� � � '"1' ' .# �F k t'�4' t: r , i �t •j • ` a��'r 1 . �� . �, � I y � t �.� ` gy i 1 �� i . ,. � ! � � . . - �� . . �V . v. , tiL �` ,.. : J t r.. � S i_ � � �. � i•� � „y,'iF . . ' �9� i �... .`17 �i � 1 �. ��'� 5..'�' . 1 . . . { JYijp �. 4 y� .q' � 'b j '' ♦ 4':"�. �'.,,-. o� �. � ..i �i � j ��, i o., �., , = q ... , � � ��' t �� •F � "' ' ,e�, J• ��+ r�' ; a�' 4, + Z §� .�' �� . � #� '� . � x F s d, . / �4 ` � w �� .� : � ' � a' : 1 i � � A i' y q,�' �� .1 �,� , � , iIr �4. r.,� ' , .. � `�. y '.y 4 �� r� . . � � , � '� ,i `� �, ��, '� � � ' 4 � p `k ' �; '. � 1 � � ,,;� � � ! ,. �u ,' t� t' � � ,� . . � f�., � �.�1!tyj � y�,.q !e r �i , ��: . J' i A �. �1r ' � ' � M `Ni. � 'J �,.ti � � • � � �. � 7 5 i � .ti. , �,. i��', , ' i • • _� a �, ' ; y '�'M � „ : � f� ',. �.� ; � . . '�/' . �. •� LL . : /I ` F�� i . �..a,,.�:�° �..r�,..� � � �.w�.. 1.�6;. �� ' i�. ... �;.� �.� � '� ��.�. � � .� � � g ; �� yyg� � F � � C �""� ' � . �� .. �'�� '�' . � � -� �f �_z� x :� � � .: r a H' f� � � � � ° �^ ? � �,� � ; ✓y � F j ' `1 f � .'t r ! 'f ;� 'iy �r . �' � z �, u. t � �' � F , � � � .TS . .:� ) � ' � � .� 'l� :�.� _ i � �.. :y� 'q t �7�. .�- j _ - . - ; . e �,.' ;'�' 6 # 1. 1� < �j F . _ .'�. �O' t . t. . .� 1 . � _�Iii ,z � � F._� . . . '. �� F2 . � '�� ' . . � � ,.0 7 � � qt;. '"' . � � . . . . • N � �� t � �� c ,.} �� ', . ' . . - � � , ��u ' �j,, ; . ` � 2! i �l;.i.q. ,` ��1 'Z.' . . . ' T °.+ , 1 I �` F k. 4,�� ' �4 ,�,5 � i °'��* _ ' ", , . ,: � �Y . -,�y i/^, / F � f ;4 y � � �'�u � ?y,_ q, t,� _y 1„ ;� � T ,4 g j • �, x y, ��►,�� ,� "� � t.' �' ti' , ,:.n �. �\ ` �'` . , `� % �r '; 5' A� *��'a,.,, `' . '� ` y J� 1 �i!.�+.."M'i �XSyLaYWYaC��Ml.b�. �+rL.� �: i1 .� � N � � � � � � 'd H � � � i`� � � Q P�l � ,{".. .IJ a.1 A a '� � � O +� � � �rl �ri !n _CQ .i+ U .Q � u � � � � � � 1.� � � cJ. O � � � � �� U 1"'� �i :d +� uz. W � �� f-d � M .�l �� ; Y � • � � J I � I ( � I . . ; �. i �� ( I hroer ZOA 76-07 7 � ;tr Robert Sc , # (� r � ' L. S � #76-11 �4' I i � � �. �, h' II � '. ::�� ;;�' I� � � �� . .,. �' � a i ' I � � I '•y� ; . ��, � - � I J�� — _�� _ _--- _ —_--- • _ -�-� _37 JFur.L.EASF _ � .c+',ri',n.t. . � .!S _ _ � � ,- - . ; s� • . �`4—��'� 1.3.f3. S. h' C�RNER SEC.2 " ' . . . � � ' , . •� . � � ' . , . 0 0 0 �i $ � i /t 23 � � / � c � �' j \�� arr b:� , �� i � '.oy�'� �: n p o �q•_ � �` " � � ' ' ' 0 1�`� C a.. � � �� ,Q �� i: . : i �. I '.� ` _�, ��. I t: �b +� ! o`� �e . K ;ti . < ts! . : �D : V ,� � � Ua ., � � ! :, f . h ' � � ,--. 0 ; �' . ., . _ . _ _ . . � _ _,.. -,_--_.r-.-- � v , �'c� • ��'�� •� � fQ�ilor • ,t.. . _ .� . ' _ � —^` `�"i �' 1'! � � .o'ie3t_ - ��36 ' ' �-v-`_=�=--° � r ;: SQ �r /zf .---ajo Z��-+ ._..,-----'.: . , ` . . ` � � p % �/ "' ba� ••� ``�� ,"� -�'r � 2 E' ' " Y _ •�s s S�bur . �_� ,r.��n :, ' = � . y ; ' "'.+ �t� � * 4 � �` ,�� j�o6f ��.5/��Nf' Q' '� 1 �� .' � `: sA•�di� .i.: '• ^, j� �� a r t` . �'► D � j N` a.. � !� � ---' 3l� "N �,� .- � G• - � G�� f�., �_ � �-- ; , �. o � . �,� c' u;'i � "' � N �• ,��roe �_.r..i' ns's`� , o�� . N � 6 c -f•�•, l� .� o_::'_c,- �e � �� r 1 O N�'� 4' 1.d 3\� -u��--�� __.' _ , �y N .;, � j ``�� -. : , � ��.,3 as' 02 x `V' i° • .•�%� .-n19.: , .' �tr. " .wl. �`. ' (� n '�,-! ' .l. � �o,., - .o� � , � �' �o �? ,� � '" �� Z N y .� r/�-� r- 4� t ..�; .i�O93 a� �� G� O I p�` � b� �/ s�� T\� �`` t��= 4 _.,. � � � `•, � �^-': Yu d � ` t a �, a � ' � � �"" q .� /: . .` •. = ,��' 060= ;�: ; 1 � ..� , . `, o� rqN ` � � // � ,,�+ � '� � ; , � L.? ; ° --- � � r 4� :s G� . � v�-.,� � � R ` � ; .� ap �- o 0o a. � _�tt�� 4� �° m _. � �' � �;' ;�`. �, a : 6 � I ____ -. � � � M o , _ F fj t�.� �o : 3 .. � � o/�y� ` �l_ l`� ,o , .� r; „� � � rn , r� � � .. � ;, W �J� "^.� � 1�, J �`�� . ob. �k '�� l� : �'��.+.. �� e� ^ � ` t!ii. _ M _�,� � 1 �j ' a dr� � er_.. 7� .. , �,�( , < "� " t�,f� � l�T �� r5� 0 m + �\1�I � sq,.� ��rCt� �; i� Q�i.o l��.'• � p:. � 4 � w _,� � � � � \ �w. .�' , y7k N� � � � y \ ^e -Y � � ; r�'' �-t� `� h °� f ' �', � -�4 : lyl c Fp�, W , a �� s� - � o , � � ��✓'' ~j;. �� x `F� ,, ~ , r� e 3 a f [� ��J - - � �c.2 � a . �. d �..� b J h a . �atl �^' "� " �O ' \ ti,� `'ti ��a acc r l6�b Evi � � _ �'4 a c�c�e ��.s!' „d� � N� 9Z5 (/� vc �p000AR4asw:+ , +�� Q \ e � � � � `- � _ J ,,�. ^ ` c. D 4 J:iL�YO ' O � � .5��1 � ^ w �' � �� O `�� 3 �1: .-fL%✓9O I 0 •w . . _'"_ Ti.) 3'_ e s:�i u'sse[ OB: � ; r!!N nY! _.. pyy °p ke '. .'.'�ttE �" � �� ; 4ize�y ��d�Q� 50 � ` " V K �� `� � ��Y ' .� S'i��F.: \ = �• 4 C �6 • ,�• '3�c --- h�94•9 Cp h 'v°,, � �'t7d �'t:-::• � �l-'rB9r --- � �' Y � � � ` o Q ��. �- H � s� �L :3� Qa ` t �a. • /�, \ � m O�.�.�°«"�"3 � _ � �i 6 : � �1 i ' N� R � c w Li7 ' ? " � `�c.► � 6f ' � `a t� � � ° , _ � 4+ `0 6 i ...: _ , \ ., n ` P •+ `� � �_ ^ r �v�,� � '\ o.%�� m � � o� ....._ •'Z�¢f� a o J/�� ` c` �•,; il � .�5-� � �s..s. ,, a �/'� � y H �. ` ` � n e_D / Q f� ='s"b � V • �, �� r � ' ... � o O(i �---i-- i ,*�-, „ z 9�'/ e � � °� i G^L. ' �. q�`�..� � m i /' .;� ^ a Q r , N �- :y ,7 ! Z/ Z ` 'i � �r � °..� : c � / 4} \� 7 � " `q 1 ° , e.3 � � �' • �y! a ..�f .�� t � �„ � __� p : :li.3 � . r,/ e '�+w. 13f.6 �i � �• ' , Z4; `,_ i� l � C�1 t` s: � p �. � �. �� y �` C" � � � . ""�� /lr� �i1 � � ' �`�' �� m (�, -�- �. •� • ' " . . f'A °- � , .. SET�� i -. ` `' v� ..10' �r J �/- sSi:i� �� /'l� C � ,^� O �� Y m� Z 6` p . s_ ` � � °,` � �\ . \ ^ �."'�' � � � �' ~ $: bj'' t ; , d� y, �, ,. �. i ,; ,.. � ,�c,� � � � �'; � sr L� ' �. n�� f' . ' . S'� �.. `o ^ r' Z . ° `�- tj6/ �'i� t�.� ¢ �. C ' � � F' � j ,•g.9u _- �a n , , c'' ., � `+ �� ` � w \: \ \ �--� U � n � , r ;n � 3 ' s.- _ U w ti Sa � �as,f. ` �' 9b C: 3 ''�� . W S 1 �,{�,,,,__ °9/ � .- � t 8 U� P f � • S F- ��r�l�' ` r� ak4 '• �r '� � � a v F- . � C" v _. � �0 ; � �""��' � .� .-- ., '- b ,�v',, p •. - .� L�' 4` O g: \ • } 00 � m bJ� Nv ..J °y'� e,� °c rh� � - 3 e m `^ �►� '"'-i 0 � ��- •.'� Y J � J � � .+6r.7d Q ��. � ��\'"� v a �;.+0 P Q� �.9 � 4 t _' ' 4?� �� "- �v � � Ca\_•� ^ y j T� P,.` � + H � �' ' L �. _ h l7�/ O � ,N M � f � �sV l � � N � Z C � U • � �° �°� `� � � �� `� � �3�',j,� ,? U j �� . � � � � � � � � � ri� .d i_e � , ` 6 � ' ¢ ` -.: f _..�►� i .� t.... �\` +A 3 � Ifo j0= - \ t } �- o � �' \ ` y � � Q� �` � • {- F- I "'� ( t� � ' �� rT• " ' a ((� • ,\ � p„' OG �.V H:a � e� ' e. � �. . � � � \ ` r. n'°� •�te M 0- � ��'•C� � ' � e 6—�' � �6� S:e �Nt� O O . • t � � / � n%� -- � .,�'ao •9 . � n�. n�. �, � °'� o\ �`_ o o�. 4� �__,i- _ — � rtfi+"' ';: - ""�\ � °� � � ..-�,__� �.' +`y ��° � � . �� - . . h a �, _ � 4 ,.- ,� � � ,%�•• �_...._ '�. �o � � �°��. _,. � . ' N ~ � . . ��i CATV COMMISSIGN ME�T]N G December 2, 1976 CAT.L TO ORDF.R : Chairman Scott called the meetin g to order at 7:13 P. M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mark Scott, Barbara Hughes, Kenneth Brennen , Ed Kaspszak Members Absent: Others Present: ��jcne Clyde Moravetz, Staff Representative Jolu� Walkmeyer, State Cable Commission APPROVAL OI'CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION�MINUTES: Motion by I�enneth Brenne.n, seconded by Barbara Hughes, to approve the minutes of November 18, 1976 as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the' �motion carrxed unanim�usly. OLD BUSINESS : REPORT F'ROP1 BARBARA HUGHES: Meeting with Anoka County Library Board on November 8, 1976 ;Ms._ garbara Hughes gave a verbal report on her meetin g with the Anoka County ' � Library Board regarding the utilization of cable T. V. channels. She felt the Board was receptive to the idea of a character generator, but no official action was taken. �I 1 ' School Districts �k14, ;�16, and ��13 have also been contacted and materials sub- mitted tor their review. The School Board of District ��16 has indicated they are not inter.ested; District ��14 is reviewing t.he materials and no reply has been received at this time; and District ��13 requested additional information on the equipment and'materials have been sent descri�iing a character generator. UPDATE (7�T NORTHLAND CAfiLE T�� PETITI(�T O�i CERTIFICATION : The Commission discussed riCCC 103 regardin g the renewal of a certificate of confirmation. . John Walkmeyer stated the need for this possible rulemakin g results from amend- ments to Chapter 238 by the 1976 Legislature. Jolin Walkmeyer stated the State Board will meet on January 14, 1977 to consider tliis item and tie felt any comments the Commission wishes to make should be sub- mitted to t}�e Board a� that time. 0 � . � ' CATV COMMISS7(l�I MP'�TTNG - December 2Z 1976 Page 2 ' MOTICJN by Parbara Huglies, seconded by Kennetli BrennQn, to notify the State lioard they are concernr.d thaC the proposed language on renewal, with the current wordin�;, could include multiple re-certifications and they would ' disagree with s��ch an interpretaeion and believe this point must be addressed in tlie public hcaring. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � � � 1 � NEW BUSINESS : DISCUSSION OI' STUDY OUTLINE: Setting of �ture Schedule The Commission reviewed the outline dated April 13, 1976 for the Calile Tele- vision Acccss Study. . Kenneth Brennen is to provide background information on the Anoka County Communications Workshop (ACCW). Barbara Hughes is to prepare an item covering the Commission's conclusions of L-he survey. Ed Kaspazak felt an evaluation should be made on the original interit of the franchise and how the company is currently operatin g the cable T. Vo station. , The Coromission agreed to survey community organizations advising them what is available and to determine if cable T. V. can be of any service to them: � Barbara liughes will prepare the letter to community groups regardin g this item. , ' r ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , kerneth Brennen is worki.ng on the history of cable negotiations between,the City and cable companies. Mark Scott stated he would contact General Television officials to set up a meeting date in January or February, 1977 to discuss various topics in connec- tion with the access study. , . � • Ed Kaspazak is to direct a letter to the School Board of District ��14 regard- ing utilization of cable T. V. facilities to explain what is available and the .,� cost involved. Barbara Hughes is to direct a similar letter to the Anoka'Courity'`� Library Board. Mark Scott wi11 prepare an inventory of existing media equipment and inform- ation on community video access centers. Kenneth Brennen will prepare a letter from the Commission, for submission to the City Council, regarding financial support; coordination of government efforts with schools, library and ACCW; use of of�ice materials and supplies; and a written commitment from the City. OTHER BUSIN�SS : F'UFTIiER DISCIJSSI(7DT ON TEC�IWTICAL FEPORT: Tl�e Commission indicated they were saCisfied with the Technical ReporC pre- sented by Ptr. Lee Steclanan. CATV COMMISSI(7N MT:ETING ° I)ecember 2, 1976 �'��e 3 POSSI);LE TOUR OF rART}I SATrLLI7'I; FACIT TTI1,S : Mark Scott stated G. T. V. would like to arran ge a tour ot the earth satellite facilities and have extended an inviCation to the City Council to tour the facilities. • � . It wa�s requested that staff pu� this item on the Coimcil's agenda to determine their interest in such a tour and what date would be acceptable. G. T. V. would then make the necessary arrangements. G. T. V.'s FIN ANCIAL R�PORT: The Commission requested staff L-o check when G. T. V.`s Financial Report will be submitted. . SET N�XT P'�ETIN G DATE : The next meeting was set_for Tuesday, January 4, 1977 at 7;30 P, M. Ab JOU R� A1LT1 T: ' MOTIGN by Ed Kaspszak, seconded by Mark Scott, to adjourn Che meeting at 9:50 P. M. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, t�e motion carried unanimously. Ite.spectfully submitted, � ff-�� -��- ��-�:c-�� . Recording Secretary 0 0 . . • � m II •' _ . ' ' � , , MEMO T0: MEl�sO FROM : DATE: SUBJECT: NASINi M. QUR.�SHI , CITY It�ANAGEft JAMES P. HILL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/ PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR ,� �7,f� U DECEh1BER 6 , 1976 MAPSI CONTRACT.(JH-68) I have reviewed the contract subr�itted by MAPSI for 1977. In addition, I have talked to A4r. Bill Gordon, 114anager for ]14APSI, regarding contract language and rates and in addition, I have had discussions with the City Attorney, Virgil Herrick, regarding the legality o� approving the contract rates as submitted. As a result of the above review, I am of the opinion that�. we should a.pprove and renew the P�IAPSI contract for 197? as amended by our office. I have taken the liberty of rewriting the contract so that the language will be ' consistent with our current contract as well as being �� more specifically related to Fridley. nir. Bill Gordon indicated the company had no objections to the language modification. In so far as the 1977 proposed rates are concerned, there are some minor increases indicated which range from 25� to a maximum of �2 per item. This appears to be consistent with normal expectations of contract increases on a year to year basis and is consistent tvith the rate increases for the City of l�2inneapolis and 52 other suburban communities. City Attorney, Virg Herrick, indicated he felt there were no di�ficulties in approving the contract as amended. � If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call upon me. JPH/pr Q ' � 9� ' CONTRACT This agreement made this , by and between Metropolitan ' Animal Patrol Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as MAPSI, and the City of Fridley, a Municipal Corporation located in the County of Anoka and the State of Minnesota hereinafter referred to as City, witnesseth: In consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. This agreement shall be effective as of the lst day of January, 1976 and shall continue in effect until December 31, 1977. 2. MAPSI agrees to patrol the public streets of �ridley in a vehicle specially designed for the transportation of small animals, in accordance with a schedule agreed upon by both parties. '?. MAPSI agrees that patrolling shall be done by competent personnel trained in the handling of animals, and that such employees shall be approved by the City's Public Safety Director. Such employees shall be empowered by the City with such police powers as are necessary for the apprehension and retention of dogs, cats, and ather animals, and such employees sha11 also be furnished with proper identifi- cation by the Public Safety Directar. However, MAPSI will not invade the private property contrary to the wishes of the ownert�af said property nor forcibly take an animal from any pe"rson without the approval and assistance of a regular police officer of the City. 4. In addition to the regular hours of p�trolling referred to, MAPSI agrees to maintain one (1) vehicle for standby service to attend cases outside regular patrol hours at the specific request of the City's Police Qepartment. 5. MAPSI represents and agrees that all animals impounded shall be kept at MAPSI housed at 506 -llth Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and MAPSI agrees �9 I 0 I � I ' � II , , � , and warrants that all animals impounded shall be kept in a comfortable and humane manner for a period required by City Ordinance. MAPSI agrees that the paund facilities sha11 be open and available to reclaim animals from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Mondays through Saturdays, and from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Sundays and Holidays. 6. At the time that any animal impounded under this contract is reclaimed . MAPSI or its agent shall collect an impounding fee of $20.00 on all animals of the canine species without a current City dog license and $10.00 on all other animals. License fee and boarding charges shall be as provided by City Ordinance or this contract. MAPSI shall -Furnish manthly reports to the City as required as to the service or services rendered in connection �vith each animal impounded. All impounding fees, license fees, and boarding charge� Collected by MAPSI or its agent shall be remitted monthly to the City. ,.7. In the event an animal is impounded and boarded by order of the City Health Office or placed under quarantine by ruling of' the State Board of Health, said animal shall be boarded as required by said order or ruling. At the end of such period, the City releases all of its interest, right and control over said animals which may then be disposed of at the discretion of MAPSI. In the event that any dogs, cats, or other impounded animal are unclaimed after five (5) days, they shall become the property of MAPSI and may be disposed of or sold at their discretion. All proceeds from �he,disposition of such animals may be retained by MAPSI, including any proceeds received from any animals disposed of according to Minnesota Statutes 35.71. 8. The City shall furnish to MAPSI all forms, license and pound fee receipts, and license tags as specified in the ordinance, and MAPSI shall keep records of all animals impounded, together with a description of same. 9. MAPSI shall equip all vehicles with two-way radio and agrees to service and maintain said equipment. G 9C 10. MAPSI shall assume liability for a11 harm to animals due to its negligence or that of its agents in not properly caring for the same, and agrees to defend any lawsuits arising therefrom. MAPSI shall defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless including its officers, employees or agents from any and all claims, suits, losses, damages, or expenses on account of bodily injuries, sickness, disease, death and properiy damage including injury to animals and the �result of, or alleged to be the result of MAPSI's operation. Upon request, MAPSI shall provide to the City proof of puolic liability insurance including comprehensive general liability, and comprehensive automobile liability in the amount of at least $100,000.00 per each claimant and $300,000.00 for each occurrence. 11. MAPSI agrees that during the period of this contract it will not, within the St'ate of Minnesota, discriminate against any employee or applicant for employ- ment because of race, color, creed, national origin, or ancestry, and will include a s�m�lar provision in all sub-contracts entered into for the performance hereof. This paragraph is inserted in this contract to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1'81.59. 12. The City agrees to pay for MAPSI services in the performance of this contract as follows: a. Price per hour per ambulance for furnishing Patrol ambulance for scheduled hours of patrol (actual time in service to City). b. Price for each 24 hours or fraction thereof for boarding any species of animal impounded by direction of City officials or local ordinance. ' c. Price per each animal for destroying dogs or cats. d. Price per call for ambulance service of injured animal or bite case during other than schedules or regular . working hours of 8:00 a.m.- 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. (Emergency Service) ' ' $ 8.75 $ 2.50 $ 3.00 $10.00 � � e. Price per hour per ambulance for service during other than scheduled working hours, except for injured animal or bite cases, including travel time. (Special Service) $12.00 13. All payments shall be made by the City upon receipt of monthly statement of MAPSI. _ 14. MAPSI agrees to provide veterinary services to impounded animals as needed at no cost to the City. 15. Either party hereto may cancel the within contract upon thirty (30) days written notice thereof to the other party. Wi trie�: s : Witness: CITY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor , By: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager METROPOLITAN ANIMAL PATROL SERVICE,INC. By: President , �; �J CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM � T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, APJD CITY COUNCIL '� FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR./FIN DIR. . SUBJECT: FINAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1976 � , . � DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1976 lo ' ' ! A brief summary of�some of the reasons budget adjustments are necessary are as foll.ows: , Elections . ,' The cost of election judges is $3,300.00 more than budgeted. This was caused by underestimating the number of hours they would work and the $.50 per hour increase in salary of election judges for the November election. We are asking for an increase of $1,500.00 in the election budget. , '"P�lice � �,� ' : Cost of vehicle repair is running higher than estimated, Fire - � The cost of volunteer fire calls is considerably higher than estimated because of drought. Other expenses are in line. ° � Naturalist The extra cost for this department is entirely related to contractual services ' for tree removal. Part of this money will be coming back to the City. ' � _ I , I, , RESOLUTION N0. ____^ _ 1976 ],O A � �J ' � A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGING THE 1976 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND WNEREAS, The City Council has previously authorized certain expenditures beyond the amounts allocated in the 1976 Budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Council of the City of Fridley meeting at a regular meeting on December 20, 1976 that the budgets of the following divisions shall be increased {decreased) as follows: Elections � $ 1,500 Police 2,000 i0 � Fire 10,000 � fVatural i st 16, ��0 • Reserve (27,350) Public 6dor1<s Maint. �2,150) �'�� Total � �U-` . BE IT FURTFIER RESOLUED, That the budget of the General Fund be increased in total and allocated as follows: Said increase is possible because of revenue coming to the City for the CETA Program. . City Manager $ 17,415 Finance 1,818 Police 15,543 . Community Development 10,408 � Public Works 3,600 Naturalist 23,990 _ Parks 20,990 Civic Center 1,131 , Total $ 94,895 PASSED AfVD ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF December ATTEST: �� , CI7Y CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL ' ' 1976. 20th .. � MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE � � MEMO T0: , MEMO FROM: � DATE: - SUBJECT: 1• Richard N. Sobiech, Public Works Director Thomas A. Colbert, Assistant City Engineer December 6, 1976 - Resolution and Execution of Technical Assistance Agreement for 1977 � Attached for Council consideration is the referenced material. ' This material is the standard action required by the State of Minnesota in order to provide requested technical assis- tance to the City and the assigning of responsibility for ' Federal projects if any would occur on City streets. The Annual Agency Agreement is specifically for Federal ' financing of projects, of which Fridley would probably not become involved. � It is recommended that the Council adopt the resolution and approve execution of the agreement requesting technical and �e.igineering assistance at the Regular Council Meeting of - December 20, 1976. The Annual Agency Agreement can be ' executed at the time Federal Assistance is required on any future project. ' TAC/jm Attachment r � � � 0 � 11 e . , „ � Y � AGREEMENT NO .�A 2 0 2 � 11 A CITY OFt COUNTY OF Fridley EWTERED RESOLUTION REQUESTING MINNESOTA R E S 0 L U T I 0 N HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT FOR ENGINEERINC -' - - -' - - -' " AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE BE IT RESOLVED, That pursuant to statutory authori-hy, the Fridley (ICCYa�Gh�`�/Y (Mun i c i pa I) Eng i neer for and on beha I f of fhe t�Jr�t,�1� (i�(un i.ci pa ( i ty) of Fridzey is hereby author-ized to request and obtain from the Minneso-I-a Department of Transporfiation, needed engineering and technical services during the year ofi 1977 , for which paymen-t wi I I be made by the (�'c�,h,tyy (h9unicipai ity) upc'n receipt of verified claims from the Commissioner of Transportafiion. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCI�L OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1976. MAYOR - William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell tSEAU (Submit Certified Copies in Dupficate) Note: Attach certification by (Auditor) (Clerk) with each copy of the resolution. � Page No. 3 ' 1 ' ' ' Mn/DOT . 30780 (11/76) 0 � STAT� OF M�NfVESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TR,ANSPORTATION TECHNICAL AND EN�INEERING ASSiSTANCE AGREEMENT THIS ACREEMENT, made a�d entered tnto by and between the State of Minnesota acfing through its Commissioner ot Transporfiation, hereinafter referred to as the "State", and the County or C11-y of Fridley j hereinafter reterred to as the "User", WITNESSETH: � WHEREAS, the User, as evidenced by Resolution, a copy of which ts � attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, does hereby request � the State to furnish from tlme to time as needed and specificaily requested, ' technical and engineering assistance pursuant to M.S. Ibt.39; and '. WHEREAS, The State is authorized to provide technicai and engineering assistance to other road authorities by M.S. 161.39, and is wiiling to do so; ' NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by the parties hereto that: I. The State shall, upon written request by fihe User, provide � � technical and engineering assistance and such other services as authorized by M.S. 161.39. 2. The Stai�e shali keep a record of its costs and expenses, �inc)uding overhead costs, in providing a�sistance and services to the User pursuant to Paragraph ! above, and shall prepare an itemized statement thereof showing the arr�ount due hereunder and submit the same to the User on a Emonthly? tannua!) basis. 3. The User agrees i-o pay to the Trunk Highway Fund of the Sfiate at Mlnnesota alt monies due t�er�e�inder and as shown by the invoices or statements submitted to ttio Use�, within 30 days after such submission. Page No. I 11 B I � � . . • . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the State and the User have caused these � •presents to be ex�cuted by the(r respective otficers. , �t'AKIDQYY/ - C ( TY 0� � Fridley I gy . ' ��'� i��'r��i9ri Pl�� t� � 1 Mayor - William J. Nee , � t City Glerk) Marvin C. Brunsell ' Date ' � (Corporate Seal) � A roved as to form and execution: PP ' By � tAss t stan�h Ai�torney GenQ�a I) 1 � 1 . 1 1 � ' � � Page No. 2 � . STA7E OF P11 NNESOTA By . Commissioner ot Transportation gy (State Aid Engineer) . Date 11 C CITY OF FRIDLEY PETITIUN COVER SHEET Peti�ion No. 25-1976 Date Received December 15, 1976 object In favor of the improvement of Dellwood Drive (Street Improvement Project ST. 1977-1) Petition Checked By Date _ , Percent Signing 0 Referred to City Council Disposition _ 12 . �1 ' � , '� � P E T I T I 0 N , The undersigned residents hereby petition for the Dellwoo3 Drive project as proposed in the St. 197?-1 Street � Improvement Project. (36' wide, back-to-back with concrete curbs and residential street blacktop ' all complete with appropriate restora- tion and sodding) � This petition is based on the understanding that all unde:^- ground City utilities are in good condition or will be placed in good condition to equal or exce�d the life ex- � pectancy of the proposed impr.ovement. �tI��2�S� � � �� - '�� C�.�.� � �� .� I-� O �s �� / � " �j� �'L b %��-LuU;�f� nrft/4'- i � s �, ��%S ,�r-�'�'�{: ��-�C .�.%�� . � � � �.� I :�.�.�.�'L�.�� 3�� . • ,y. • �~ %.,%� �1� f/'�,�i�/v '��'� � ' �r� . _:�n ��! � �ifi��. k1()o0 �� 'J '`� �� Y � �,��'-';%.r-4-�/i%� 1y 3 � 1 � 1 1 l�jti'��vd2�� ' ,��; �� . /�i �, /A ' "+ ,, /� /'"/ � ' ,�'...�v G� , i i � - �i{;� ; %/L� � ✓/C�C� ��.-`�.c.,' �_/1 L�l^�i!J � � �/2 � �� %''Lc�: �'' �' i �l� 0 d � 12 � � _ u` � , � �� --- �,., �� .r�� . �� i., _ . � � � � ■i . ' ��, , • • �1 5 _ • � 4 j i . � � � � 1. . � ' � y '+1 ( � � � IZ i � ` � � ' � • .: , � � � . .� .. ,,•� s�::,,.< ��. ;...., �o �-:�---r�o- --:�. _:;:COUt�7Y�-STAT�-fkCb HiGHUJl�-Y- -NO- �-�F,-�i r��:_;.,_7a -� , ; . . ai.�2 ,3--t--, � � ' ---- -- t �—. . �l � I t . � ` ' : » • 7S ; j �_ ��; , 1 8 .,� °� (� � -�--� ' .�. r �J y. }� �.� v / ) / ( S � �. ` ' V V �;�1.7.� . �• #".�t' ��i•. � i4 � . . : ': .�. � ^ ' ;� ' � � N �. ;� : /.v :Yf�.•'.' �� . . .• �i (400> �::•:;�':r,'�.�'f��;..�:��. �r: y ' ; O . �.}�:�7ih�:%:�i!i�3?�::� ::'�: ; -� .;�.�4;;;. �: _� i � - - }r :: : : �:� � :;: � (¢.ZO) �� :� ti � lc��i_� l; o: • � ' {�f'!i `h F' � 1 � - . :�% w � . 1 . � �. %C / I . i � L h iicii ! Q ' � .. -�--y- �----• �Y�. � '�; a ti � I � o �6 '�'�� o ' i — � i��____ �\\� � � ' � Z �;.: :�:::::: :� :�: , ,,,� � �:: :...�...,;�: �.�. � � � > Y � � �� ._ :: � .. ;� � , � ��.:;:::�; >. � � �' � �"� T ^ ` ��6't� ff,�'� � �. � ' �¢ � ',::; ��a;... �.� a � ,'` e. „� :;�':;'.�,-�''�,.�::�.•:��':�a �: " }„� � ��F1L_ ''�'-'-i � ''� \ �I. , � W I � �j� r � � }-� i L?�i� __!� _ � �� ! a ! o � � � � � � � V, � aJ i � � , _1�'I_1f.-� .� . � � � �r: r,: ��J ' "_ N / ' 4• •` %f��Fa ,� �� ..� t•t _ „ � � �? Y1 :.�.i _ . .� � � --- . � � �` �� ,f � ,o ` � 7S 73 a �\ � � c � - fff_'J �, , � - �� q • y;� :.i�'�t �+•�•,i � �:�:• �:�;:;;;:.4��s ' � � o � � 9 b : :: '� :;�: Q v � �,t� ;s, :�::.� ':�'�A: i , • - �-1'_-'.' � . ( � a�' ��3 �n. �-•-•----•L:-. .....� . I J.- '4 . � ' •JP' 1, � �J .J' ` , ` F' � � �� `/ r 6 ; � � : : 8 ;,;•,• .� �5 ti �; � � x� ..- � ,.� r I r� �.i !,� ,,� A /') t �E `� r'.. _ � LL1C . '� , , � � 1� �s. .;�� . / N DLl.3 ;,, . � ry^ � ^ �. _ ��o I� ' '�v � iv � In Fawr_ of Dellc�ood Drive � \ Street I�rovement (12) �� r� (Petition #25-1976) � � � ° , _ , , , Against I�llwn�od Drive \.� j�� ..... Street I�rovement (,1� �� < <�: (�etition #26-19763 "�� r 1 1 f i � .ti�� I b�°.� �/. ✓`�;: i"t f ? 4 � ' ; ' � � i : . �°� �t �� i . <.. a _.._..... _._:.Z�B� e _ t .:.+ •- r-=';' � - f �, �� 1 ; , «�..� �- � � ; ; � , ' � ! .� �'� _� • � • • i �� .... ,!�r � 7 � ►,' • : , � � .�'•� . � ' ► � _ . �• � J!'s �z�> . ' ,:� 4, , � ..a � • � �' � � ' .,, . � � ��1.c� � ..� � � ,�. � . �. . , �;. i � �. CITY OF FRLDLEY PETITIUN COVER SHEET 12 C � Petition No. 26-1976 Date Recc:ived December 15, 1976 object In opposition to the improvement of Dellwood Drive (Street Improvement Pro�ect ST. 1977-1) Petition Checked By Date ' _ percent Signing � ` Referred to City Council _ Disposition _ � .......�__ ., .�..._...� ., � ..:.� ,.. ...,,.. . _ _v..... ,: _ . ...�..2..._..._.:.� .. _ _....,.._...._,.._._ ,... .. �_ . • .___ ._. _._ _. . _ . _____., L ... . �rs j 1 ; , . l2 D We ownora of property �J.onh De1lt.rood Drive sre opposed to the ST 1�77-1 Fz•idley Street improver�ent project. This pxoject is dr�scribed as: 36� t,ri.d�� back-�ta.b�ek �rith concr�te curbs and resid�ntnl streQt U1ac�:t�p, �:�ll cor.�lete �rith ap;�ro�r3ate restoration tand �ociciziz� and th�.t all cit5r uncerprour.d services �rc ir� good concition oz tri�l be pl�ced in �ood cor.dition as �a paxt rar.d cost of �che project. t�re a1Jo r�co�_;t�ize thi ; sf,�oet it~ipxo�en�nt m,��y be schedulod iu another �re<�r in �:ccox•ci��r.ce L•:rll,lz city—t��idc � txeet itRproverner.t policy F �� , I ' ` � ( , 1� � -� � � _ ._! G,•---�-zaa-----�.:..---�ro- --;:.�---;;.t;OUhtT�Yti-STAT� AI�L� HIGHti'SI/�!Y �EJO� C r. �' � + -..—:.,....�:._.,.. t ;. � i ( r .._ I 1 � ,� �3 � %3' � y r. � I�j � . � 6� � • v,I ♦ � � � � . . � � '�' t;' �" ` i Y"' �' �. , _ .. . i � � 1 � •V � �w � � , � � � ., 1 �! ° � : ri � � ,WI � , � � i: � � � ? r ;�,. � s P..�%s_ �x,� '.._ � , � 7S 7S a . j�a „� . , � , I' ' � o ti �� ' '—�1--"- Q �': ' �' � �, .. 1 � � ,yy. -. �^ � I ' �� ' � v � �� h.� , �0 0� ;�I � �a�, c ��'� �o°; '� �1\�\� � ' '' ,`� ` ,� � �' ��. :� �� ;� V �; f ; -,i�'. ' `,L?�'�°„ / v:,�.• .. ;;��i�0.'.'"."'"""�,._ :....... �—.►,,;;�; : `.�4 '; :ri .ju. ` . q��, r R� �� y V �..i Y� 1 �'•:., ��1 �� t.�i�►.l. Jo`... � .': • . � ,• ro.. /•/�� j . I'_"7 J� I 4�. �• o i e �l '4l?1�.3 ,,• : ': In Fawr of Dellwood Drive street Iiiiproven�nt (12) (Petition #25-1976) 1lgainst Dell�•x�od Drive Street In�rovement (.�O�C�� (P'etition #26-1976) � ...�,�'/� ! ,. ..� �` :: . I ' \. • .� �• . . EN r: , � • �£c ; , . .. .. �-�%•�'��..��srr— lZ E � 60/ . ' ✓` ` , + r • '� • � � + � (B') h � . � � • i i � � ' �. �N 0. �38 � ; � r�� f� . ;, � �' � � ! % � , . ' Cri � �. o � t� i � � ., , �: • �8�� : . r _. . 2 U ; ; � s � � � , � . � , • . �_ N � � p • ' x^' '41 / • : i { � , to��o �9F+�lJo•M" ' ��.{ - � � lSJ. t { � //�� f ' s e �� , �' O� �� N ...• i, �'; .�. n � J � n ; , W n � � ` �'°� 1 l ' :,� % , • • .,� : s - "�.` .= 9!9 to;f- � �. � ; � , : m ��-- � ► � ` a o �. ��: ; ° i i � � �1.w j j C �. � � . o '•� j ; m • .� � t .4_ _, � � � � r m ; ,..t . . . M °�` ! ` ` �, �; _ , � - � a vvr�o�'/ � �,: ' � ;,,r4 : C`�-0,�� , s�+ ..� ' •'� { , � .. i� ; , , ; °o a : � -`s � y- ; � . i -> •� . ! r <., a , _ + ._ _—:1�.►B� + . , � -:��^*�-�' � ... � . A'� � .� � ; � i . ,. � _: . •� ! • � � T � . . , +r f � � ... . � r • ' y ; • • "t ; ', � ; . ...., � � } � ; _. { �! ` ' =� i .• .►�� itl � r � s .. • . �z�'"ID� i: ��. r 1,.:. � ; .,,. . ..:•. ' ...�ME '.• ' ',!!� � � R�SOLU'fION N0. RESOLUTION ORIDERING ID9PROVrMENT AND PINAL PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS AND E;STIMATES Of� COSTS TH�RIiOP: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST._1977-1 f, 3T. 1977-Z, ADDENDUM #1 h7�lEREAS, Resolution No.110-1976 adopted on the 18th day of October, 1976 �'� � by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as specifically noted in the Notice of l�caring attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and � iYIjEREAS, all of the property owners �ahose property is liable to be assessed H�ith the making of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten. (10) days notice by mail and pubiished notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was heTd and the property owners heard thereon at the hearing as noted in the said notice. NO{V,.TH�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows: ; ' . 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 86-1976 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible,to wit: �� ' Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-iiix bituminous mat, concrete curb F� gutter, storm sewer system, w,iter F, sanitary sewer services F, otlier facilities located as follo��s: Dellwood Drive 63rd Avenue to Mississippi Street 2. That work to Ue performed under this project may be performed urder one or mo�re contracts as may be deemed advisaUle upon receipt of Uids. 3. That the �'ublic IVorks Director, Richard N. Sobiech is hereby ' designated as t}ie Ensineer �or t)iis improvement. He sliall prepare f'i.nal plans 111CI specifications for the making of such improvement. ' 12�F ADOPTED BY THE CIT'Y CO�NCIL Ol� THE CI1'Y OF FRIDLEY TIlIS DAY OF _ , 1976. r�yp]i - {VILLIMI J . NEE IATTEST: � J , CITY CL1iRK - P9/1RV].N C. fiRUNS1iLL � �� I' J � • ' , �� ' . ' ' • L� , I� ' I� ' .l3 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BTDS BE IT RESOL.VED by the Council of the City of Fridley, as follows: l. Triat it is in the interest of the City to award bid contracts for the following items or materials. "STREET SWEEPER" 2. A copy of the specifications for the above described it:ems and materials, together with a proposal for the method of purchase and the payment thereof have been pr•esented to the Council by the City Manager and the same are hereby approved and adopted as the plans and s�>ecifications, and the method of acquisition and pay- ment to be required by the City with respect to the a�:quisition of said items and materials. 3. The purchase of said items and materials as described above shall be effected by sea7ed bids to be received ar�d opened by the City of Fridley on the lOth day of J��nuary, 1977. The City Manager is directed and ai�thorized to advertise for the purchase of said items and materials by sealed bid pro�osa7s under notice as pr•ovided by law and the Charter of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially in form as that shown by E:�hibit "A" at�ached hereto and made a part of by rE�ference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. ATTEST: PIaSSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 01= FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1 �a 76 MARVIN C. IBRU�JSELL - CITY CLERK ILLI M J. NEE - YOR � 1 � � � , . ' � � � I� I� � � ' CITY OF FRIDLEY BID NOTICE for STREET SWEEPER EXHIBIT "A" The City•Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota,wiil accept sealed bids on.one (1) Street Sweeper on the lOth day of January, 1977 until 11:�00 o'clock a.m. on said date at the Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (Telephone: 571-3450). All bids must meet the minimum requirements of the specifications. Failure to comply with this section can result in disqualification of the bidl. Each bid shall be accompanied by a Certified Check, Cashier's Check, Cash or Bid Bond and made payable without conditions to the Cit:y of Fridiey, Minnesota, in an amount of not less than five pe�rcent (5%) of the bid, which check, cash or bond shall be forfeited if bidder neglects or. refuses to enter into Contr�ct, after Piis bid has been accepted. _ The Cit:y reserves the right to accept the bid which is determi�ed to be in the best interest of the City. The City reserves the right t:o reject any and all bids and waive any informalities or technic:alities in any bid received without explanation. The Cit:y Counc9l also reserves the right to consider such factors as timE� of delivery or performance, experience; responsibility of the bicider, past performance of similar types of items or materials, availat�ility of products and other similar factors that it may determiine to be in the best interest of the City. Copies of the specifications and general conditions may be examined in the office of the Purchasing Agent,. or cop9es may be obtained from this office. All bicis must be submitted in sealed envelopes and �lainly marked on the outside with "STREET SWEEPER". PUBLTSI-I: December 29, 1976 January 5, 1977 Nasim M. Qureshi City Manager l3A 1� MEMO T0; NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL � FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST.. CITY MGR./FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: RESO�LUTION SPLITTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPORTIONING INTO� INNSBRUCK VILLAGES ADDITION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1976 - The splitting and apportioning of the above listed properties for the Resolution on the December 20, 1976 Agenda have previously been approved by the City Council and have been recorded at Anoka County. l�e are now requesting that the special assessments be split for the new plat. � MCB/bl I', � RESOLUTION N0. 1976 . 1�� A � � A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PART OF LOT 49, PARC:EL 2300, AUDITOR'S SUB. #92 AND OUTLOT B, INNSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION AND APPORTI:ONING INTO INNSBRUCK VILLAGES WHEREAS, certain spe�cial assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land h�as subsequently been subdivided, and replatted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: �That the assessments� levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: � Part of Lot 49, Parc:el 2300, Auditor's Sub. #92 and Outlot B, Innsbruck North , Addition, may and sh�all be apportioned and divided and replatted as follows: r � • � � � � � � , � � � � � ORIGINAL PARCEL ParcelT2300, Aud. Suib. #92 Outlot B, Innsbruck North Add. PLATTING OF PARCELS APPROVED Blocks 1-11&13-23,In�nsbruck Villages (88 units @ $1�.43 e�ach) (88 units @ $68.78 e�ach) (88 units @ $152.20 each) � (88 units @ $128.39 each) (a8 units @$171:39 e�ach) (88 units @ $391.93 each) Outlot A, Innsbruck Villages Outlot C, Innsbruck Villages Park, Innsbruck Villages FUND Reg SA Reg SA SW #36 SW #103 SW #103 SS #103 St 1972-2 S #113 Reg SA SW #36 SW #103 S4J n 103 SS #103 St 1972-2 S #113 Reg SA S #113 Reg SA SW #'36 SW #103 SW #103 SS #103 St 1972-2 S #113 Reg SA ORIGINAL AM)UNT Paid Paid $ 1,143.67 . 6,328.10 14,002.28 11,811.44 15,767.82 37,624.90 86,678.21 Paid $ 1,093.84 6,052.64 13,393.60 11,298.32 15,082.32 34,489.84 Pa i d 1,567.54 Paid 49.83 275.46 608.68 513.12 685.50 1,567.52 Paid �86,678.21 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS T DAY OF , 1976. ATTEST:. �C`�TY CLERK - P1 �VIN-C. BRUNSE�— MAYO � WI LIAM J. NEE � � 15 MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR/FIN. DIR. ` SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SPLITTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPORTIONING INTO ALICE WALL ADDITION � DATE: December 16, 1976 The splitt:ing and apportioning of the above listed properties for the _ Resolutiori on the December 20, 1976 Agenda have previously been approved k►y the City Council and have been recorded at Anoka County. We are now requesting that the special assessments be split for the new plat. MCB/bl li � RESOLUTION N0. �9�6 . 15 q I , I � � � A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL 4860, SECTI0�1 14 AND APPORTIONING INTO ALICE WALL ADDITION WHEREAS, certain spe�cial assessments have been levied with respect to certa�in land and said land h�as subsequently been subdivided, and replatted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the assessments levied against the folling described parcels, to-wit: Parcel 4860, Section 14, may and shall be apportioned and divided and replai:ted as follows: ORIGINAL PARCEL Parcel 4860, Section 14 PLATTING OF PARCELS �4RPROV�D Lat ls & 2, Block , Ali�' e�all Lot 3, Block 1, AlicE� Wall Lots 4, Block 1, Alic:e Wall Lots 5-10, Block 1, �llice Wall Lots 11-17, Block 1, Alice Wall Lots 18 & 19, Block 1, Alice Wall Lot 20, Block 1, Alic:e Wall Lot 2i, Block 1, Alice Wall FUND Reg SA SS #71 St 1961-1 St 1965-2 St 1966-3 St 1966-1 (SC) St 1967�4 Trees (1975) Reg SA SS #71 St 1966-3 St 1966-3 St 1966�1 (SC) Reg SA SS #71 St 1966�3 St 1966�3 Reg SA SS #71 St 1965-2 St 1966-3 St 1966-3 Reg SA St 1965-2 St 1966-3 Reg SA St 1961-1 St 1965-2 Reg SA St 1961-1 Reg SA St 1961-1 St 1967 -4 Reg SA St 1961-1 St 1967-4 ORIGINAL AMOIINT Paid � Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid � $ 7,330.40 425.00 �7,755.40 Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Pa i d Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 148.08 Paid Paid 165.75 PAGE 2, RESOLUTION N0. 1976 -- AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTfNG OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON �ARCEL 4860, SECTION T4, AND APPORTIONING IN�iO ALICE WALL ADDITION � . PLATTING OF PARCELS APPROVED Lot 22, Block 1, Alice Wa'fl Lot 23, Block 1, Alice Wail Lot 24, Bloc.k 1, Alice Wall FUND Reg SA St 1961�1 St 1967-4 Reg SA St 1961-1 St 1967-4 Reg SA SS #71 St 1967�4 Trees (1975) ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS� OF � � � � 1976. -� �-----------�-�-�-- A7TEST: , � . . � � � �� CITY C RK � h1ARVIN �BRUNSE � ORIGINAL AMOUIJT Paid Paid $ 165.75 Paid Paid 792.80 Paid Paid - 6,058.02 425.00 $�7,755.40 � �� M YOR - WILLIAM J, NEE DA' ( 0 15 B � � � �� Denni.� �chncidcr 6190 :�i�inson. I'.l_�rc7 . Frid:l_ey, T.`"T�l 55432 Dece��zber 12, 1976 Fridley City Council I'rid7_e�= Co�rnunit�� r�ve]_o�nr�ent Corrmi�:�ion I'ric�ley Civ�ic Center Fric�1_ey, ?:�iI? 55432 DE^.r Cou��ciJ_ T:`e�.bErs and C?�C Cor��.issior_ers; As yau �,re doubtless a,`-��,re, I 1�_a.ve bec:�z elec �,e�.�i ��a _� i1:1. � t'_�e �,`;arcl 2(;i.ty Council s �at. T<<�ill �a'r�: of:!°_i.ce �a.t �r�e firs�L Counc_� 1 m��tinv° in JanL?arf. Due to t��i� ci_;;ct� on, ?��. ?iereb�T submittin�; ?��r resi"nation Tro��i t::��c ��o_��1uni_�;�,T � Develonm�nt Cor�riission, to bee��^�e effec �:?ve on I)�ce`_bcr �1, 1976. � I have grea ��l�T enjoyed servin� on the CDC an.r.� ��ve en jo�re d Chairin� �t'nE, CDC's Si�-°n Ordi!?ance Pro� ec-(; Co,,�_:1�_-i,-f;e;e. I i::�ve learned man�� asr�ects o-F' city and comr.!U.n �_t�,T �,f�<<,�..r.., ��rhile servin�; on i.�ie Co��.mi.ssion. Ti�� s Y•no�F✓7_ed.��e ��_,'_l � bc of �rrE:at � ass�_stance {�o me in i'�.�llfillzn; mt�r ob_l_i.�;a �ior.a ��»��.d c?uti�ti as a Counci_l_ ��ember. I re`�-ret h�,vin�; �a �esi�:�� .�'ro�. ti=:_: Cor�r_mission, an.a tile Si�;n Cor�r.�� tee--'au-t T Sc�:!_ ��_=�r irlvo�_tie— � r?ent of mine as an off� c�_al �,�e:�ber ��oti?ld -��rE��_-� � coril:i_ct of int::rest �rrith T:�y c�uiies as a Cour_ci) r�er::��cr. i`;eerie� s to say, I�T�i_l1_ be rcady and c�illin� t� ?_��lr e�_t'��er ��le C1;C or tre Si�,�n Cor�r.zi�ttee ir_ a_:_y ��ra� ��ossible, 2s ?.on;s; a.s :no � c�nFa.ic�i;s `�ri_th rn,y City Counc?_1 du�ies �.r�se. � � ' � � ' I 1 16 As �Tou r�.y l;:novr, the Simr Orainance Pro j:.et Co.:�-�.�:�t �ee �Z�s selec �cd T�_s. Pat CT�.Uel to C��.ir �he Co�:L�1� � �ee ?;?::o:n :�r cie�_�:�rtu-re. I'_2ope her �election is �.:��rot�e� b�T �r�.:: CDC, ^.s I a, con��. �e�1� th�t she �vi1.1 co-�?ple � e tlle difficult t^s'� assi�;_��.ec to �L-i�L Co?�.nittee in. a tir•zely �.nd co-:2�e �en�E ��,n��er. Once �.�ain I��ish to tll�.nk the Counc�l �°or �ner.�iit �in,� r.1e to scrve o�. the Com�unity Dev::lo�-;r?ent Co:_�^issio�n., and I cvish �o thnn':_ th� me�bers of �Lhey CDC �or the i��-f'ormn �ive and _friendly ciiscussions tnat •too'_ nl� c� over -�.'.�e p�.st y:: �.r at our meeti.r�s. � Sincere_ly, �1�L%✓ /S • �C �t�n��{-� 17enn:i.s L. Schnc:ic�er ESTIMA.TES FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - DECEMBER 20, 1976 Smith, Juster, Feikema, Chartered � 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 . For Legal Services Rendered as Prosecutor for the Month a�f November, 1976 Wea.ver, Talle & Herrick 316 East Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 For legal Services Rendered as City Attorney for the mon�th of November, 1976 0 $ 1,502.50 :> 1,720.66 ��] . TIME RECORD FOR PJO'�EMBER, 1976 PROSECUTION WORK 1. Preparation, T�ravel and Time in Court for 24 pre-jury trial conferences, Z1 court trials and 1 m�tion. 2. Investigation and Process of Complaints including office conferences, phone con- ferences, correspondence and preparation of 30 forrr,al complaints. 3. Court and Police Administration. TOTAL 24 hours 17 hours 0 hours 41 hours DATE � � � FORWARDED FROM LAST S7ATEMENT 12-02-76 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley. November, 1976 Retainer. $1000.00 Secretarial Services 100.00 Time in excess of 30 hours (11 hours 30 minutes) 402.50 I dec:�re under penaities of 3pw thai this a�;atlr�", c�aim ar c��•:►�.�r.c� i:, ;��s; �r,; cor• � r�ci �and � no �:ar oi i�`ha .. �� S 7n• e oi C►airnant SMITH. JUSTER, FEiKEMA, CNARTERED ATTONNEYS AT LAW � n� we 30 n�i nutes 30 rii nutes • BALANCE $1000 . 0(! $i 100.0(I $T502 . 5(► 1� A , � �CHARIES R. WEAVER HERMAN L. TALIE VIRGIL C. HERRICK ROBERT MUNNS WIL�IAM K. GOODRICH ,THOMAS A. GEDDE JEFFREY P. NICKEN DOUGLAS E. KLINT '' S City of Fridley , . LAW OFFICES WEAVER, TALLE & HERRICK 316 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 421-5413 December 17, 1976 13 B INVOICE N° 2064 , ' �November Retainer $1,000.00 Council Meetings 16 hours �Staff Meetings 3 hours Conferences with Staff 6 hours Memos and Legal Research 8 hours Citizens Inquiries 3 hours, , Articles and By-Laws - Teen Center 4 hours , 40 hours Aours in Excess of 30 @$35.00 per hour 350.00 � District Court Fridley vs. Erickson - Preparation of Summons and Complaint 100.00 ' Barlcer vs. Fridley and M& I- Preparation of Legal Memo 150.00 Secretarial Allowance �Expenses Advanced �_ � ' �J 100.00 20.66 TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1, 720 . 66 VCH LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY THE CiTY COLJNCIL AT THEIR REGULAR MEETINC 19 ON DECEMF3ER 20, 1976 GAS SERVICES , APPROVED l3Y Schnapp Plumbing & Heating 116Z4 Flintwood Street William Sa�ndin Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433 By: Kenneth Schnapp Plumbing-lieating Insp. GENERAL CONT'RACTOR � � Paco,.Incorporated 5920 Kirkwood Lane Darrel C].�erk Minneapolis, Mn. 55442 By: Gerald Paschke Com. Dev. Adm. HEATING . Owens Servic�es Corporation 930 East SOt:h Street William S+indin Bloomington, Mn. 55420 By: Robert Owens Pltunbing-;ieating Insp. Schnapp Plumbing & Heating 11614 Flintv,rood Street William S�indin Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433 By: Kenneth.Schnapp Plumbing-:3eating Insp. MASONRY Master Masonry Tnc. 14914-93rd Avenue North Darrel C1�3rk Osseo, Mn. �i5369 By: Richard Fischer Co�r►. Dev. Adm. SIGN ERECTOR Brede, Incoi-porated � 2211 Braadway N.E. Darrel Clark Minneapolis,. Mn. 55413 By: James Bratland Com. Dev. Adm. Gold Medal F3everage Co. 553 N. Fairview Avenue Darrel Clark St. Paul, Mn. 55104 By,: Arthur Margot Com. Dev. Adm. Lawrence 5ic�ns, Inc. 945 Pierce l3utler Route Darrel Clark St., Paul, Nln. 55104 By: William Lawrence III Com. Dev. Adm. 19 A LICENSES TO BE APF'ROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR MEETING OF DECEMBER ?0, 1976. TYPE OF LICENSE: CHRISTMAS TREE LO'f BY: APAROVED BY: Badger Evergreen 1Farms Warren Latzig R. Aldrich Route # 2 Merrill, Wisconsi�n 54452 Lot for selling l�cated at Target Shopping Center, 755 53rd Ave. N.E. e FEE: $25.00 plus $100.00 deposit � 19 B, . MUL7IPLC DL�lELLIt�IG L10EPlSES TO BE APPROI�ED: Period Septe�nber 1, 1976 to Sepi:embE�r 1, 19i7 ' pllNER ADDRESS UtJITS FEE APPROVED BY: , Ral h W. & Linda Lee H�3 ne 105 - 58th Ave. NE 7 $ 1]..25 R. D. Aldrich, r y 2777 N. Dale St. � 'Fire Prev. ' Roseville, Mn. 55113 � - _ , . � � ' , � I , • • . , ' � . ' - � • , . . , ' • ' . � ' . ' , : • ' . . ' � �� ,, ■ � 1 MEMC7tRANL7UM CITY OF FRIDLi�Y F.,431 UNIVERSITY AVE. NE. FRIDLEY, MN. 654:32 [E'i'127 57'1-345.7 MEMO T0: FROM: DATE: HOt�ORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER DECEMBER 17, 1976 OFFIC� OF THE CITY IVIANAGER NAStM M. G:URESHI RE: CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAt� FOR GRADED CITY EMPLOYEES A revised clas;sification and compensation plan for graded City employ�es has essentially been cc>mpleted. This has been developed by the Department Heais of the graded empioye�s and the City Manager as a management team taking into consi- deration the information input from these employees, their supervisors and the comparable data frc�m metropolitan suburban communities of our size and complexity. This new systE�m is based upon provisions for equitable and systematic compen- sation for work pe�rformed by different graded employees. The system estabiishes two salary structu�res for the graded employees: � �� 1. For Office Positions 2. For Professional and Technical Positions � The two salar.y structures are composed of ranges for positions and tre total span of the ranges is over 30%. � 0 - 10% Be___,�c i n n i n Ra�nge 5°6 5°6 ncremE�nt Increment OVER ALL RANGE 0 -- Over 30% 0-3% 0-15� Goin Special Performance Range Range The overall range �s further subdivided into three sub-ranges: 1. Beqinnin� Ran e: This range is composed of a 10% span from the beginning of the range to t�he end of the range and includes the provision of two 5% incre- mental adjustments. The beginning point of this range would be the mini�rum starting salary of the positions grouped in this range. The individual starting at the minimum salary range wou7d have the potential of receiving a 5% �ncrement of salary after satisfactoril.y completing six months of service to the City. The individual would be eligible for an additionai 5% increment upon one and one half yE�ars of satisfactory comp]etion of service to the City. y ' � 0� ' O ' � ' ' � ' , ' � ' ' i� , , ' MEME�1lRAi�![�UNI CITY OF Fi�ICIL�Y 6431 UNIVER5ITV' AVE. NE. FRI�LF=Y� MN. 5�i432 (6127 S7'1-3450 If an indiv�idual has and above that nF�cessary of the two i ncrernents of OFFICIC OF 7HE CIT`( IVIANAGER IVASIM M. C3lJRESHi exceptionai abiiities and/or reiated experience over for the position, the individual may be started at either the beginning range. - 2. Goi•ng R;�nge: The going range is provided to indicate that the positions grouped in a ran��e potentially could have different "going rates". In this area an individual's :salary can be adjusted because of special requirements cr working conditions of th� position. The adjustment within this range would be flexible and range from z��ro to three percent depending upon the nature and circimstances of the position. � 3. S ecial Performance Ranqe: The special performance range will be utilized for compensation of the position based upon the recognition of special K�erformance and other warranted considerations. Any point within this 15% spread cc�uld be used for actual salary 7eve1 once the employee's salary level has reachE�d the special compensation range. The only limiting factor would be the tota' money allocated to each department. This plan should provide the flexibility necessary for a performance based system of compensation. Therefore, it is approE►riate to change from a longevity based system to a performance based system for c:ompensa- tion consideration. However, the employees who were hired before OctobE�r 17, 1972, wi71 retain the current 7976 longevity dol7ars. They would, of course,�be.eligible for special performance consideration within the special performance rai�ge. Any salary adjustment'will be based upon recommendations of the Su��ervisor, Department Head and approval.of the City Manager. This system has been developed after considerable study for a peri�ld of over four months. The Department Heads of graded employees and I have unaniinously agreed to adopt this system for provision of an equitable and systematic compe�sation plan for our graded E�mployees. Approved by: � Q.�,,�. /�( . asim M. Qureshi, City Manager ��, ,c�.t � .vu,�,l.t Mar ' Brunsell, Ass�stant City Manager/ Finance Direcior / ames Hill, Assis an City Manager/ ublic Safe y Director NMQ/ms ' Attachments , . Richard Sobiech, Public Works Director �� v+ Charles Boudreau, Parks and Recreation Director • MEfolrOlRAt�iOUMi � � O�C1TY OF FRIC�LF_'Y O 643'1 UNIVEFiSIT`�! AVE. NE. ' FRID[.EY, MN. 5!543� (612� 571-345D ATTNCHMENT NQ. 2 ID�FICIE OF THE GITY MANAGER NASIM M. t3URESHI � OfiFICE POSITIONS SALARY STRUCTURE - 1977 ' 15� 10% 3% BEGINNING GOING SPECIAL PERFORMAIJCE '� RANGE GROUP RANGE RANGE RANGE � � OP-1 $540 - 594 $595 - 6i3 $614 - 706 ' OP-2 $578 - 636 $637 - 656 $657 - 755 ' _ � OP-3 $619 - 681 $G82 - 702 $703 - 808 , �P-4 $662 - 728 $729�- 751 $752 - 865 , OP-5 $709 - 780 $781 - 804 $805 - 926 � OP-6 $759 - 835 $836 - 861 $862 - 491 ' OP-7 $812 - 893 $894 - 921 $922 -1,060 ' ' � Rate> listed are monthly. ' ' Progi^ession between range groups is seven percent. ' . � ' ' . ' ' � � . �, MEMC.��ANDUMI a�CITY OF FA10!_EY O 643'1 UNIVEFtSITY AVE. NE. FRIDLEY, MN. 55�t3f.' (612) 571-345� RANGE GROUP PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 P7-4 P7-5 PT-6 PT-7 PT-8 PT-9 ATTACHMENT N0. 3 O�FtC� OF THE CITY MANAGER NASIM IN. C3URESHI PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL POSITIONS SALARY STRUCTURE - 1977 l00 3% BEGIPlNING .GOING �RANGE RANGE $ 836 - 9?_0 $ 921 - 949 $ 878 - 966 $ 967 - 996 $ 923 - 1,015 $1,016 - 1,046 $ 968 - 1,065 $1,066 - 1,098 $1,016 - 1,118 $1,119 - 1,153 $1,067 - 1,174 $1,175 - 1,210 �1,121 - 1,233 $1,234 - 1,271 $1,177 - 1,295 $1,296 - 1,335 $1,236 - 1,360 $1,361 - 1,402 15� SPECIAL PERFORMAPICE RANGE � � 950 - 1,092 � $ 997 - 1,�47 $1,047 - 1,204 $1,099 - 1,264 � $1 ,154 - 1 ,327 $1 ,211 - 1 ,393 $1,272 - 1,463 $1,336 - 1,536 $1 ,403 - 1 ,613 Rates l isited� are monthly. Progression between ranae qroups is five percent. i