The URL can be used to link to this page

08/15/1977 - 5629ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 15, 1977 THE MINU7E5 OF TNE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEV CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 15, 1977 The Regular MeetmngbyfMayorFNee,ey City Council of August 15, 1977 was called to order at 7:30 p• PLEDGE OF.ALLEGIANCE: � � ' Mayar Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of A1legiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• . 17EpgERS.PRESENT= CouncilmanaHamernWkk�and�Councmlman�Fitzpatri�k or Nee, MEMBERS ABSENT: None PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION: asYarmNemberrofethe HumanrResources Comn9ssiont��MayorMNeewthankedSMrttScotthforshis��es belp and�service to the City as a�member of the Comnission. . servMnghon,therEmironmental�Qua7etynCommissionYe MayoreNea stated thisPcertificateor would be forwarded to Mr. Paripovich. APPROVAL� ES. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 25, 1977: . I• Councilman Schneider�requested the following corrections 6e made to the Ju1y 25. i 7977 minutes: d of Page 3, seventh paragraph; first line: Eliminate the word "of at the eo the line. II Page 6, fifth paragraph from the bottom; first line: Eliminate the words "could �be rental property" and substitute the words "area was�all single family and the idouble bungalow could destroy the character of the neighborFwod." ! page 7, fourth paragraph; second line: Insert the word "large" between "the" and j "size." j page 7> fourth paragraph; fourth line: After the word "lot," add the wards '� "makin9 a lat split difficult." � MpTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the above amendments. Seconded by � Counci7man Schneider. UDOn a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared j the motion carried unanirtwusly. � I! S�econdedyby Louncmlman�5chneider.t�Upoo aVVOice vote,eallfvoting2aye 9Mayo� Nee declared I the m6tion carried unanimously. �� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETIN6 OF AUGUST 1, 1977: � � � I� Councilman Schneider requested the followin9 addition be made to the Nugust , � 7977 minutes: i Page 9> add the following paragraph after paragraph nine: "Councilman Schnei er I further stated that he felt that two months of detail discussion on this ordinance '; � was enough and that it was time now to act on it. He said that voting should Ii ' � � I I � i RE6ULAR MEE7ING OF AUGUST 15. 1977 �i �I i I II I �I Ii i'I i i I pA6E 3 for issuance of this temporary Councilman Schneider stated> when he was in contact with Ms. Hartos, he had indicate lied to the Counci7 indicated there was a time to her that there was no.requirement of a public hearin9 ticense. .He stated the infor'matio� supp factor involved and he was �not aware of the actuai date of the competition. e stated he bel�ieved it was Mr. Beckler's intention to remove the structure at th this time the canPetition ended. 1977 meeting regarding Gouncilman Schneider read the minutes fran the JuIY Z5� ast the item.� which is P Ms. Hartos questioned the period of time allowed for the license, cpmpetition date, and the fact that ther�here wouldnalsonbe�aneopen�housemforsthee7der stated. if a home was built on the lot, � be for a short period public. �o�g, Ms. Hartos question°d Ms. Nartos fett the open house for a home on this lot would on y basis, without � if it was�comnu� Practice to issue a license, even on a temporary of time as hanes in the area are not on the market for ver rwtifying the residents. tanPorary trailer �timesof strikes�n Mr. Sobiech stated they haven't had that many on a temporary Fridley• The ones issued were mostithe�staffsreview felt �itrWas only He stated, in this particular case> ro riate time. basis and would be removed at an app P Mr. Sobiech Ns. Hartos stated> she understands, Mr. 8eckler does have a lot in Fridley. residentialBsettingWandeittcouldWnotabehshown in�thisumannerkin�hes�"pb��enhome sales 1ot. throu9h the comPetition and taking it down before the open house. Mayor Nee asked what the residents reaction would be to letting Mr. Beckler keep t e �pbile home up Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt he would question this action since the permit as . 6een�issued Cou cil without havingeMr mBeckler presentJeLt He felt action shouldn't be taken by ��puocilman MSh�Haatosaindicatedstheyrhadn't,tbecause theslhcensenwastissued Dycther d' ectly. ir Council• e�njt starts a precedent, it is something the residents p gentleman in the audience stated he is concerned primarilY with the traffic. felt if this temPOrary p however, he was concerned toehear MruCBecklersis providin9dsome improvementntontheelote �n the area and was g7ad that a precedent might be set for using the lot. � � MLs. Hartos voiced concern with the problems�of parking while persons are visiting the�trailer. Ms. Hartos stated they also have the license until November 1, 1977 and it does give them the right to disp7ay. the final Mr. Sobiech stated no restrictions were placed on the permit issued, onlY date far remaval of the trailer. He sug9ested a communication to Mr. Beckler indicating the concerns of the residents. Councilman Schneider questioned if it was possible to put restrictions on the hours of display. % �� Mr. Herrick felt Mr. Beckler should be contacted before any action is taken by�t e idea�of havinghstaff contactSMra Becklermto 1et himaknowhthe�concernsUOfWthe nei9hborhood5 and to see if he would agree to some schedule as far as hours. this Mr. Qureshi, Gity Manager, stated the staff would work with Mr. Beckler re9arding pointed out that the lot is not a residential lot, but is zoned for multiple use; however> problem to see if the impact on the nei9hborhood can be minimized• Mr. Qureshi a so the use maY be limited on the lot because of the size. _. . _ !i � �� 157 PAGE 5 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1977 Or. Trezona stated, it looked to h9m, that it belon9ed to the log and boom company. Nr. Herrick stated from what he has seen and has found at the court house, he has the ppinion> at� this time, that Dr. Trezona owns the property. �Dr. ?reZOna�requested that Mr. Herrick write a letter ta his attorney, Mr. Wyman Smith, re9arding the opinion. Mayor Nee felt aqy further discussion could be brought up at the assessment hearing. DISCUSSION - SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY AT 79TH AND MAIN STREET: appeared before theeCouncilrore9ardangtaeproposedsuse�forrhis property at�thisreet, - 7ocation. Mr. Brama explained he has a party interested in subletting his property for purposes of a"do-it-yourself" automotive repair center. Mr. Brama stated there is nothing in the ordinances to cover this intended use and it waS the staff's recaimendatian they should obtain a special use peimit. Mr. Brama exp7ained because of the time involved in obtaining a special use permit and the.possibility of losing a prospective tenant, he would like to request a determination fran the Council if a specfial use permit is necessary. Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated they have reviewed Mr�. Brama's request and as far as the use being permitted by the code, there is nothing which states this�type of use as being permitted. He felt, therefore�, by applying�for a special use permit, it would give residents of the area an opportunity to be heard at a public hearing and advise them as to what will be going into the building. Mr. Herrick, Lity Attorney, stated the code does not specifically mention if this use is permitted or prohibited. He stated service uses are mentioned and can be permitted, providing they are not detrimental to the neighborhood, etc. He stated ��the qaestion comes down to, if the use is a service use, similar to others that ; gre permitted, or if the use is something like a service station and requires a .�Special use permit. � � � ' Mr, Brama stated he would like an opinion as to whether it is necessary to apply for a special use permit. Councilman Hamernik stated it�would be a commercial venture and there was another application for this area for a tumbling school and these persons were advised a special use permit is required. He felt it applies in this case also. He stated he felt a � precedent Fiad been set, to some degree> as the tum6ling school was advised to obtain a special use permit. Mr. Brama explained, if the Council looked favorably on a special use permit, the person interested in his property wouid�obtain the necessary equipment as he felt the business should 9et in before the cold weather. This is why he is concerned about the time involved in applying for a special use permit. Cuuncilman Hamernik stated he could see no problem with that particular use providing everytbing is in order and all requirements of the code are met. � Ma�yor Nee felt it would be a valuable service to the comnunity; hov+ever, he would like to��see vrhat comments the public and residents might have. . Lounci7man Schneider questioned if the special use permit could be considered by �� the Planning Camnission this Wednesday, August 17. Mr.�Sobiech stated it would not be possible, as notices have to be mailed. '� Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the next Planning Comnission meeting is nn September 14 and Council coutd consider the request at the September 19 meeting. Mr. Brama was advised•that a special use permit would be necessary, and application 4hould be made so it can be processed through the Planning Cormnission and Council. M 1,�� Pace � REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 15> 1977 Mr. Herrick stated he agreed with Councilman Schneider's comnents regarding gifts � and felt the language in.the ordinance should not pose aqy problem. � .adpptNit oo the�second�reading andWpublishe SSe ondedaby Counc�idmanaFitzpatr9ck,and with�theaCity AttorneyasecommentsfthatCettw uldibe�di�f?�ultuforvasprosecutoratoees � prove intent, but felt that the way this is written the mere allocation could be damagin9. He indicated he would prefer to see that section rewritten. He felt Sf certain things are to be allowed, they should be noted to remove aRy chance of an iotention. - Councilman Schneider felt, if a list was provided of those things that are permissible, it�would�almost 6e an invitation of gifts�of a certain kind. He stated he is �canfortable with that section of the ordinance the way it is and felt the kinds of things mentioned earlier, no prosecutor would prosecute on as the conclusion would have to be drawn, before it could succeed in court, that there was intent. Councilman Hamernik cortmented that he is not really comfortable with this section as it is written. M97ION by Councilman Hamernik to amend Section 30.01, Subdivision 3, line 3 by changin9 the 5% to 10%. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Nr. Herrick stated in Section 30.32, Subdivision 1, Item 3, and Section 30.30, Su6division 7, Item 4, you not only have to prove that there were two people that were interested in the same enterprise> but aiso would have to prove�that the person who fil�ted out the form knew this. He stated, if there is going to be any enforcement, it puts a real burden on the administration or prosecutor as he again has to prove �� intention or knowledge. Fle stated he had no objection, but wanted to point this out that enforcement will be very difficult. � �. 1_ UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE AMENDMENT> all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the � motion carried unanimously. i ' i Councilman Hamernik stated he felt the cortments from the Charter Commission have not � been answered regarding Section 30.60 and who will pay for litigation. Mr. Herrick stated there are same statutes that provide, under certain circumstances, the City pays the cost of defending the Council or administrative staff, but whether this�applies to Comnission memoers or not would have to be determined. He also stated there is insurance covering the Council and staff for personal liability errors in judgement, etc.> but did not know whether the insurance would apply to Commission manbers. Mr. Herrick stated he could research this matter, if the Council so desired. Mr. Herrick suggested the ordinance could be amended to indicate that the cost of the � defense would be paid for by the City, if the individual is found not guilty. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to amend Section 30.60 by.addirg the following paragraph: "The City shall reimburse reasona6le defense costs providing the defendent� ��is�found�'not guilty". Seconded 6y Louncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all � voting dye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ��UPON A YOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Schneider thanked all the Comnissions and individual Comnission mem6ers for the time'spent in reviewing this ordinance. He felt the ordinance is a small step in the right direction and wished to thank them personally. NEW BUSINESS: OF � Councilman Schneider sWted the remarks in the Planning Coimnission minutes of August 3 ! ��. � indicate they did not want the Council to act on this particular item as yet. 1(il PpGE 9 REGULAR MEETING Of AUGUST 15, 1977 Cpuncilwanan Kukowski stated the amount af minutes 6eing�taken.is phenomenal, and felt it is up to the Planning Comnission to make any corrections. like�tomknowiwhattthat isa�however,fhehfelt minutes a�eedifferent than1a5transcrWpt1d UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ___,._,_,,,, r„ ,,,rvr Action on this item was taken earlier in the meeting by the Council. M1Clnao w .••_ . . . Councilman Hamernik asked if there was any input from staff regarding how this could be handled. Mr. Brunsell stated there was a report submitted on other cities' requirements as far as bingo proceeds � � Councilwoman Kukowski stated, when the Council was considering a similar request> there was discussion on what percentages would be allowed. Mr. Herrick felt the Council should review the ordinance regarding the licensing for bingo and possibly to amend it as to what is required. He also felt the forms � � for reportirg the bingo proceeds should be standardized. bt ' in I 1 CouncSlman Namernik felt it would simplify the whole plan for the City by o ain 9 the gross sales from the tax records. Mr. Brunsell, City Clerk, felt a certain amount Of gross sales should go to charity. �� haveNbingok someof�them�appearntohpay a largerfpercentageeofatheir 9ross�incomeSinho prizes than others. course ofatheebingotsessionhtthereCaremjackpotsewhichyare paidhbyrcheckandHeUStatedhe they show jackpot payments as an expense. Mr. Herrick asked what percenta9e.of their total income is paid out in prizes. The Knights of Columbus representative stated their avera9e gross is 82,800 an evenin9 ard their disbursements wi11 run between $1,600 and $7>70�. Mr. Herrick questioned what percentage would be paid out in jackpots. Representatives of the Knights of Columbus stated about $75 a session. Councilman Fitzpatrick felt the request of the Knights of Columbus�to use bingo proceeds for improvements was a reasonable one, in view af their gross as reported to the Council. � MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick W approve the request of the Knights of Columbus� � to use bingo proceeds for repair of their building up to a maximum of $10,000. Seconded by Louncilwoman Kukowski. � . Representatives of the Kni9hts of Columbus stated when�they summarized their needs> . it did rat include replacement of some tables; however the total still would not exceed $70>000. Counci7man Fitzpatrick questioned the difference between the gross sales and gross profi�t, when they have a net profit. The Knights of Columbus representatives explained {he gross sales are the totals taken in for an evenin9; less the prizes would be 9ross profit; and less the expenses fo� rent, salaries> sales tax, etc., would be net profit. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � . � i � I . 1i�3 REGULAR MEETING Of AUGUST 15, 7977 PAGE 11 RESOLUTION N0. 75-7977 - CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1978 BUDGET AND AL50 CALLING P LIC HEARING EXPENDITURES TO BE MA�E FROM REVENUE SHARING fUNDS: MpTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 75-1977. Seconded by � Counci7man Schneider. Upon a woice vote, all votin9 aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOlUTION N0. �76-1977 - DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WATER - SEWER�AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 121: . MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 76-7977 Seconded 6y Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye> Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. N0. 77-1977 - MOTION by Councilwoman Kukavski to adopt Resolution No. 77-7977, Seconded by Councilman SChneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � RESOLUTION N0. 78-1977 -.DIRECTING PREPqR4TI0W OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE ST. - AND ST. 19 -2 STRE�ET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: . - MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt Resblution No. 78-1977, Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. - uiKtcilNG PUBLICATION OF HEAR � MOTION by Councilwoman.Kukowski to adopt Resolution No. 79-1977, Seconded by Councilman Hamernik.� Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �. RESOLUTION N0.'80-1977 - DIREC7ING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL fOR ST. . 9- REET IMPROVEME T PR JECT: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt Resolution No. 80-7977, Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee�declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 81-1977 - DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING�ON PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT 0 T. 9 5-3 STRE R V EN R J CT: � l�TION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 81-1977. Seconded by Councilman .Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,.Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 82-1977 - DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1977 SERVICE CONNECTIONS: � MOTION by Lountilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 62-1977. �Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votirg aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � ! i RESOLUTION N0. 83-7977 - DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING�ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT � '� � E FOR 7HE 977 SERVICE CONNECTIONS: � MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 83-1977. Seconded by Councilman ; Hamernik.� Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried , unanimously. REfULAR MEE7I� OF AU6UST 15, 1977 APPOINTMEM: CITY EMPLOYEE: �E POSITION STARTING EfFECTdYE SALARY DATE 9rook Thomas Schaub Polite Officer $945/mo. August 29, 389 S. Warwich Street �g�� St. PauY, MN 55105 is,� ; � PAGE 13 , REPLACES ' Ricbard Huss MDTION by Councitwoman to approve the appointment of Brook Thomas Schaub as.a Police Officer at 3945/month, effective Au9ust 29, 1g77, Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote taken, all votirg aye, Mayor Nee declared the rtwtion carried unanimously. �� LICENSES: . . MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all�voting aye, Mayor Nee dec7ared the motion carried unanimously. I CLAIMS: � t40TI0N �y Councilwanan Kukowski to authorize payment of Claims No. 205J02 - 2229gg, Sewnded tiy Councilman Hamernik. Ilpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES: t Weaver, Talle & Herrick 316 East Main Street Anoka, MN �55303 For Services Rendered as City Attorney for July, 1977 32,102.35 Smith, Juster, Feikena,�Chartered 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 For Services Rendered as Prosecutor for July, 7977 S1>765.00 MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to approve the estimates as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously�. � CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY THE GIRI SCOUTS FOR A BURNIN6 PERMIT: � i MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the request by the 6ir1 Scounds and waive the fee. Seconded by Councilwanan Kukowski. i Councilman Fitzpatrick indicated he had some reservations about this permit. He i � stated he did not understanE the. distinction by the Pollution Control Agency about what is allowed and what isn't. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager stated, generally, it is the size of the property involved. He stated the City's role is that the Fire Department is aterted and to respond, if the burnirg would get out of hand. �,� Counci7man Fitzpatrick stated it is his understanding, the reason burning wasn't � f allowed on another occasion is that the Pollution Control�Agency doesn't want the� � �,T�t;o�. ; Mr. Qureshi felt the question is which is worse, the diseased trees or pollution. i Councilwoman Kukowski felt this is a rwn-profit organization and they have to look ! at the expense to remove the trees. i __ _ ._ _ _ _ REGUTAR S Following are the AC7I0NS NEEbED. back by Wednesday Noon, August 24, COUNCII I`�FFTINA - Ai��iieT 1S PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA�JCE: R0 p • All Present Please have your answers 1977. Thank you. 7077 _ 7.zn n M . __.. . .�.. . �� PRESEPJTATIOfd OF CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATIOPJ: i'IILLIAM E. SCOTT, HUMAN PESOURCES COMMISSION Certificate Awarded MICHAEL D. PARIPOVICH, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION Mr. Paripovich not present, ACTION NEEDED: Mai1 Certificate to Mr. Paripovich APPROVAL OF MIP�UTES: REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, ,IULY ZS, 1977 Adopted with corrections ACTION NEEDED: Make Corrections in Minutes. REGULAR �OUNCIL MEETING, AU6UST ]., 1977 Adopted with corrections ACTION NEEDED: Make corrections in minutes ADOPTION OF AGEtdDA: ADDED: Girl Scouts Request for fee waiver:on bqrning permit for diseased trees - - ACTION NEEDED: Inform Girl Scout Councii tnat waiver-of fee was denied. The City Council desires to discourage burning if the cost to the City for the removal of trees is not excessive. Contact the City Manager's office with any information before roceeding with any action. UI'Efd FORUP1, VIS�TGRS: 1. Petition Received Oppossing Temporary Mobile Home License to Reed Beckler ACTION NEEDED: Work with Mr. BeCkler on Parking & traffic problems. 2. Dr. Trezona propertyr ACTION P�EEDED: re: Didn't feel diseased tree he was charged for was on his Get clarification of ownersfiip of the property. --- 3. Mr. Brama, 79th & Main. Inquiried if he needed a special use permit for Automotive Repair 5hop. He wilt come into to discuss proceedure with staff. AGTION NEEDED: Assist Mr. Brama with his request when he comes in. OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION �OZ OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CONCERNING METER 1— 1 B READING AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES �TABLED B�lI%�)� �� Adopted on First Reading with Amendments ACTION NEEDED: Make corrections to Ordinance and put on next regular meeting for second reading CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 3O, A CODE OF ETHICS FOR CITY 2-2E � AdoptedLon second reading with amendments � QYd. �.bl � � � � � � ACTION NEEDED: Make changes in ordinance as adopted and publish NEW BUS Ir�ESS : CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTIN6 CHAPTER Z14 ENTITLED SI6NS, AND REPEALING PRIOR CHAPTER 214 ENTITLED SIGNS RND BILLBOARDS� ��..� 3- 3 L Tabled. Staff to work on language and it was referred back to the Planning Commission for completion ACTION NEEDED: Forward to Planning Comnission, work on language, and bring back to Council for first reading when this is completed. RECEIVING THE r�1NUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF �ULY Z%� I9�%� � � � � � � � � � ' ' ' Minutes Received ACTION NEEDED: File for future reference ,,,,,4-4U EERIM6 f�EW BUSINESS (COfJTI��JUED) S REGEIVING THE I`�1NUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 3, 1977, ,,,,�� Minutes received � , , , , , � � � � r� _ 5 ACTIO�pEp: F��e minutes for future reference RECEIVING INFORMATION FROM LOCKE LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PERTAINING TO LOCKE LAKE IMPROVEMENT, ,,,,� Tabled to the meeting of September 12, 1g77 6 ACTIO� ry ry�EpEp: Tabled at the request of Mrs. Bakke, President of Locke Lake Association. Put on September 12th agenda. CONSIDERATIOY OF A REQUEST FROM THE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS TO USE BINGO PROCEEDS FOR REPAIR OF THEIR �UILDING, , , , � � � � � ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,7 Approved to a $10,000 maximum ACTIO�pEp: Inform the Knights of Columbus of Council action CONSIDERATION OF PROGRAM FOR DISPOSAL OF TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES, , � � � � , , , Program approved. Staff to notify adjacent property owners'that property8 H � � � is going on public saie in case they wish to purchase. 4CTIO�pEp: Notify adjacent property owners and proceed as authorized � CE i�EW BT U` S_ Ip_ +� �CONTI�JUED) PAGE U �OMSIDERATION OF FINAL GRANT APPROVq� FOR THE S PROGRAM, , , TEP APproved'apPlication' ' , , � � � � ' ' �% AC7IpN NEEDED � ' ' � � 9 —"---�_- Proceed with making final grant app��ation as ,', authorized CONSIDERA7ION OF q RESOLUTION CA��ING A PUBLIC ON THE l9J$ BUDGET AND ALSO CALLING q.PUBLIC HEARING ON EXPEMDITURES TO HEARING Resolution No, 78BE MqDE FROM REVENUE SHARING F ACTIaN NE€DEp �9�7 adopted UNDS, -`"�------.� Publish Notice of Hearing as authorized CONSIDERqTION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PR TkE FINq� ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR �'IATER, SEWER AND SEWER EPARATION OF IMPR�VEMENT PROJECT �r10, Resolution No. 121, , STORM ACTION NEEDED 76��Q» adopted � ' ' �_� Proceed � ' ' � � . as authorized � CONSIDERA7ION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIN� p�$ HEARING ON PROPOSED FINAL SANITARY SEWER AND STORM S WER SjMPR � MENT PR e�pTER,oF F�o, 121. , Resolution No. � � ' � ROJECT ACTION NEEDED; ��197 adopted.� � � � � ' � --�—__._ Proceed as authoriZedset September 1g for� � � Hearing � . 10-10�!�— ' � �l - 11 , 12 - 12 A CONSIDERqTION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIN� PRE �INqL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE ST, STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, ,�, PARATr�N OF 7HE 1977-1 AND ST, 1977-2 Resolution No. 78-]977 adopted � ' ` � � , , , � � � ACTION NEEDED• �---�• Proceed as authorized 13 - jj A _-_..>> - �----__ �__�___ .- r �NCE CE 1 �aEW BUSI'JESS (COfdTIr•�UED) PAGE S CONSIDERATION OF q RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NEARING ON PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ST, I977-1 AND ST, ],9]J-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, , , , � � � Resolution No. 79-�977 adopted. Hearing set for September 19 14 14 A ACTIO-pEp; proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ST, 1975-3 SrREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. , , , � � � � � � � � , , , , ' , Resolution No. 80-]977 adopted. 15 — 15 A ACTIO�Ep: proceed as authorized �CONSIDERATION OF p RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED FINAL A3SESSMENT ROLL FOR ST, 1975-3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, ,,,� Resolution 81-7g77 adoPted. Hearing set for September 19 , ACTIO-Ep: proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE I9%] SERVICE CONNECTIONS. , , , � Resoiution No. 82-]977 adopted , , , � � � � ,.,,, AC7I0_ ry`EpEp. py.oceed as authorized � . 16-16A � , 17-17A�` CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUF70N DIRECTIN6 PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 197� SERVICE �ONNECTIONS, , , Resolution No. 83-1977 ado ted. , 1 '� �� ACTION NEEDED• � � � � � � ----__• 'Proceed as authoriZedHearing set for September 79 . , 18—I8AI JCE I NEDI BUSI;lESS (CONTIP�UED) ---------- CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIN6 PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVq� OF TREES (1977), , , � � Resolution No. 84_1977 adopted � � � ACTION NEEDED• � � � ' ' ,,,, ------_______• Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1977), , , � � � �� . , ' , Resolution No. 85-1977 adopted. Hearing set for 5eptember 19 ACTION NEEDED• ------.�_• Proceed as authorized CQNSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT3 ON LOTS S—%, BLOCK 1, ONAWAY, AND APPORTIONING INTO LOTS S, 6 qND P�. 35' OF �OT �, $LOCK 1, AND ��. 5' OF �OT %, BLOCK 1, ONAWAY, , , Resolution No. g6� � � � � � � � � , � ACTION NEEDED• 79» adopted. Hearing set for,September 19 , ------�._• Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION -0F A RESOLUTION AUTHORlZING qND DIRECTING TyE COMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 2$, BLOCK 4, AND Lors 29 aNn 30,.BLOCK 4, NYDE PARK� Resolution No. 87_7g77 adopted. ACTIO_ N_ ry�pEp: proceed as authorized I9-19A 20-20B 21 - 21 A 22-z2a ICE � i AI ! tJEW BUSIPJESS (CO�JTIfJUED> -----___ C�NSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTH�RIZING AND DIRECTING THE �OMBINING OF $PECIAL �SSESSMEDITS ON Lors 37, 3$, j9, AND 4O, BLOCK IZ, SPRING BROOK PARK, , , , , � � � � � � � Resolution No. 88_1g77 adopted 23 ACTIOlEpEp: proceed as authorized CONSIDERATlON OF A RE50LUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTTNG THE SPLITTIN6 OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT IO, BLOCK 1, HEATHER HILLS SECOND ADDITION, AND PART OF LOT Z3, PARCEL ZBOO, AUDITOR�S SUBDIVISION N0, ZZ, qND APPOR7IONING INTO HEATHER HILLS THIRD ADDITION. , , , � � � � � � � Resolution No. 89-7977 a�Qpted 24 - 24 p ACTIO�Ep: proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTIN6 THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PqRT OF Lo-r 11, PARCEL 22jO, qND PART OF Lor 12, PARCEL 2400, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION ��0, 155, qND APPORTIONING INTO TARGET ADDITION, , , � , , � � � � � � � � �.� � � � � � � � , Resolution No. 9p.)977 a�qpted ' 25 �CTID�Ep: proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING fHE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PqRT OF Lor 13, �ARCEL 1].40, AUDITOR�S $UBDIVISION ��0, $9, qND APPORTION- NG INTO P�ORTON AVENUE HOMESITES, ,,,� Resolution No. 91_j977 adopted � � � ' ' ' ' � 26 - 26 A :TION ryEEpED: proceed as a�thorized �, --�__ eE I � t�En� BUSI�IESS (COfJTINUED) PAC� 8 �ONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIN6 AND DIRECTIP�G THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PqRCELS 2400 AND ZyO]., $ECTION 11, AND aPPORTIONING INTO PARCEL Z4O2, AND WEW PARCEL Z4OO, SECTION ].1, , , , � � � � � � � � � Resolution No. 92_7g77 adopted 2� — 2� A ACTIO�EpEp: proceed as authorized APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE, , , , , � � � � � � � � , ' Brook Thomas Schaub appointed Police Officer effective 8/2g/77 28 ACTIO�Ep: process a Personnel Action Form for new employee ACTIO-^---N—�E�� Inform Officer Schaub of his appointment LICENSES, , , , � � � � � Approved as presented � � ' ' ' � � � � � � , , , , 2g _ 29 K AeT1p---�DE�: Issue licenses as appro��ed I �LAIMS� � . , , , � � � . � � . � � , , , Approved as presented ' ' ' ' ' � � � 3� ACTIO�pEp: paY claims as approved ESTIMATES, , , , , � � . � � . , � � � , � � � � � � . � � Approved as presented 31 — 3�. $ ACTIO� NE�pEp: pay estimates as approved ADJOURN: 10:40 P.M. �. � ____�_--� � . FRIDLEY CI7Y COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: NAME �� /,�' �% % ��====a======°__=____°___��_�_== ADDRESS ` �J /y/� s -- - ITEM NUMBER � � / . !s' / 'i' _ ,3 r � -__________oa___aasaam�-_- '�'aaa"�"'_ ' � � __'��-'vmo��. �� s'� , e�.u- �� . � 30 _ � � � S33 ' . z�� . z? � � �< : .. .� 6 �y! , U"�w fv.f v.r! ' `5�[ ��7/ �i �i �� /i/� � -- �:... � . � - � •- � � !� ` 11 , , „ �� - � . 3 � _��U� / � FRIDLLY CITY COUPJCIL REfULAR �OUNCIL i`�EETING -�UGUST 1�, 1977 — 7:30 P,r'�, FLEL'GE OF (?LLEGIAfJCE; PRESEI';1I;T!Gi�; OF CEP,TIFICATES OF APPRECIATIOfJ, ._.� — _------ WILLIAM E, SCOTT, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIO�; MICHAEL D, PARIPOVICY, ENVIRONtfENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION �APPROVAL OF MIPJUTES: REGULAR �OUNCIL MEETING, �ULY 2�, 1977 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, Au�usr I, 1977 ADOPTION OF AGEfdDA: )PEfd FORUP1, VISITORS: iCONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGFNllA - IS MINUTES) _------�AGE_Z __ OLD BUSIf�lESS: CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDIN6 SECTION �I�2 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE COhCERNING P'�ETER READING AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES �TABLED BIII%%). ,,,, 1- j� CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READIfv'G OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 3O, A CODE Or ETHICS FOR CITY QFFICIALS� � . , � � � � � � � , � � � � � , � � � � � � , 2 - 2 E � NEW BUSII��ESS: CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING CHAPTER Z14 ENTITLED SIGNS, AND REPEALING PRIOR CHAPTER 214 ENTITLED SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS, ,,,,, 3- 3 L RECEIVING THE �'�1NUTES OF THE PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING oF Ju�v 27, 1977, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 4 - 4 U 5 PJEW BUSIPJESS (COfJTIPJUED) _.__PAG RECEIVING THE P•�1NUTES �F THE PLANf�liNG COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 3, ],�]], � ,,,,.,,,,,, 5-5U RECEIVING INFORMATION FROM LOCKE LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PERTAINING TO LOCKE LAKE IMPROVENENT� ,,,,, 6 CONSfDERATTON OF A REQUEST FROM THE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS TO USE BI�NGO PROCEEDS FOP, REPAIR OF TtiEIr BUILDING, , , , , � � �,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,7 CONSIDERATION OF PROGRAM FOR DISPOSAL OF TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES, , , , , � � ,,,�.,,,,,,,,,.,8-8H � GULAR COUNC I L MEET I NG, AUGUST 1 S, I9%I PAGE 4 itEW BUSIP�ESS (CONTIMUED) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL GRANT APPROVAL FOR TNE STEP p PROGRAM � , � � . . � . . � � . . . � . � . � � . � . � � , 9 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CALLING A PUSLIC HEARING ON THE I9�8 BUDGET AND ALSO CAILING A PUgLIC HEARING ON EXPENDITURES TO BE MADE FROM REVENUE SHARING FUNDS. ,, lO - IO P� CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ��ATER, SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ��0. �],, , , � � � � � � � '� � � 11 - 11 A CflNSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLiCATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLI FOR i�ATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PRQJECT ►ra.i2i ...........................i2 - 12A CQNSIDERA7IQN OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF TNE �INAL ASSES5MENT RO�L FOR THE $T. 1977-1 aNn ST. ].9]%-2 S'fREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, , , , , � � � � � � ' � � � 13 - 13 A �. - � +, Pa NEW BUSI�JESS (COrdTI�JUED) �CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIN6 PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT RO�L FOR ST. 1977-1 AND ST, ].9]]-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, , , , , , � � I4-14A � CONSIDERATION,OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIN� PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR $T, I975-3 SrReeT IMPROVEMENT PROJEC7. , , , , , � � ��..,..,.,, 15-15A t CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ST. I9]S-3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, , , , , � � � � � 1b-16A CONSIDERATION OF A RE50LUTION DIRECTIN6 PREPARATION OF TNE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE I9�% SERVICE CONNECTIONS. , , , � � � �: � . . . . . . . . . . . � � . 17-17A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATLON OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 14�� SERVICE CONNECTIONS, , � , � � � " ' ' � . , . . . 18 - 18 A NEW BUSI�dESS (CONTIP�UED) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIN6 PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1477) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Ig - 19 A CONSIDERATION Of A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES �19�%), , , , , , , , ; , , , , , , 2O - ZO B CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS:ON LoTS 5-7, BLOCK 1, ONAWAY, AND APPORTIONING INTO LOTS S, 6 AND N. 35' oF Lor 7, B�ocK l, AND N. 5' OF LOT �, BLOCK 1, ONAWAY� . : . � � � . . � � � . � � . . . � . � 21 - 21 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIN6 AND DIRECTING THE COMBINING OF SPECIAI ASSESSMENTS ON LOT ZH, BLOCK �I, AND LOTS 2� AND 3O, BLOCK �{, HYDE PARK� ZZ - ZZ A 1 FlEW BUSIfJESS (COIdTIPJUED) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE �OMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOTS 3�, 3g, 3�, AND 4O, BLOCK IZ, SPRING BROOK PARK� , � . , . , , , , , , Z3 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING . THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOF IO, BLOCK 1, HEATHER HILLS SECOND ADDITION, AND PART OF LOT Z3, PARCEL 2800, AUDITOR'S $UBDIVISION N0. 22. AND APPORTIONIN6 INTO iiEATHER HItLS THIRD ADDITION� . . � . , , , , , , , 24 — 24 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESO�UTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PART OF LoT Il, PARCEL ZZIO, AND PART OF LOT I2, PARC�L 2400, AUDITOR'S $UBDIVISION P�O, ISS, AND APPORTIONTN6 INTO TARGET aDDITIQN� � . � � �- � � � . � . � . . . . . . � . � � . � 25 �ONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIN6 AND DIRECTIN6 _THE SPLITTI�iG OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PART OF Lo-r 13, PARCEL IIUO, AUDITORIS $UBDIVISION ��0� ci9, AND �iPPORTION— ING INTO P�ORTON AVENUE HOMESITES, , , , , , , , , , , , , 26 — 26 A � : tJE�J BUSIPlESS (CONTINUED) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCELS Z�IOO AND Z4O1, $ECTION 11, AND APPORTIONING INTO PARCEL 24OZ, AND WEW PARCEL 2400, SECTION 11, , , , , , , , , , , , , Z] - ZI A APPOIMTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE� � � , , � � . . � � � . , , Z$ � LicENSES . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 - 29 K , �LAIMS� , . � . � � � � � r � . � . . � � . � � . , , . �<30 ESTIMATES. � � . � � . . -� . � . , , ', � . � . , . . . . 31 - 31 B i , ! ADJOURN: � . � . . � . . . � . ' 4 F r, � � �: . :::' � � � �� Q r 0 w W z Z � � W J 0 K LL � O Y H U � � O 1�- ix- H Q ~ �~�!�- � ow�t�� O � U�.Q V �-�n�x�w� ¢��.�cLmo w� a�za fY0 t�lL pU'J awrnoa ¢a...t-°o �a�'�-�L'oc�w ��w�¢o � �nxhi-o « �-�wa. woww�� 4w-F-F-C'OPtnr+, Q �' ��PH¢�w!-S. �/1 w � t� v1 � O J -�w � `� J Grau¢wc°,�' �"232 2 aw`�oc�2G 'j �� ly � ^l F— 2 LU � _ V i lL C lL 1� :-1 �� O O CC J�n > � ��3dw �-.ta�-.ww�� c�wa x�.p � �w ` ' wwn.�~,�~,!w- ti�wa Z� u-atiww�rc � � ��C:F-Q�U2 i � w 2 r. p •+ V�-. i.L U 0.' C.1 U�-. fY01u � V �aP2a�� U � � H Q � x ��c�"i��wwo �ocnti.wv�. U>. e-. lY W H � � � ti � F-kUU2twi�ti ..•.,.'�y��fl.a` Iti�. '.,+c .. . = � w / � p* �'w ��;n '.§�T�'S�',,^Rqn �Ii( Taljl��lJi9l�IJ�d ,�. t,°.��s�'".��'Ri'wr^ti�J�.��.^�� p„ur,ta��„� u� y � � �� vl L, ,, r .. '� . ,c 5� I.>t1� .�Rl rN�`�tii fi ��f k r�� A A , f y.i V R �� v'h+� . ,� n1b .. � ��r' pt:.. . �•.u... . c l ��1.+.'.._ . �iJb�.... . _� A' ,� w. - /. a �-r U a � U . F' °' �-r � U Z W '-' � � � O 3I � (y N � � o, M F- � � ¢ � Q I � � OS � �? 0 ;� � � �. � . �.:a�.. r.. �� .�::i :� . -- . � :�'r��?'�,. ..,.,_, :_ ;t�-s:. ,:.. ; . ;�; ;;'r �� ti .i��,,9,, .'f�22:1°,g �ja1.�i�?;L', y ¢� � J 'S�v��*\`''a' � � w!y`i/,P� h'nV: f �ti �. . �' , . ��!� �44Hy � �.� 1: % a•.�.Y��.� �1:�� w :.. , O I-- Fx— �. '-. p O�. �i-2.K�. F- F- 0.� z � F— r.�-�p�nr. 2 —i00 W v� CJ O Q �. U �. Q I~-ct a�w� MJt�.Ot0.i� PQO V ¢ ^ � ti Z. azl-�`uc�¢k aw .��c�o 0.� o� ¢z�"��.OZf' � < �. w v�a�wz � �-�-.�oa°��' .zi--w�Qo �`pnu',oti�wa � rn CLi{> f]�N 'ww i�'z= �,�aF-Qwi- -�".,w�a�of-° i `ww��2czi u.�uF-2w� 0¢OK-J..1�v��y. ��'¢��3C4.1 � '-. c� '-. w w z � vwcY z�,p wwa�~�� t�x-zw¢ 2� ��F�w�r� .-�wZ~rQ-.°� HUe-.ILU IYU O 2 J j� a� V � aP2 iL a j ow �a ¢ � c��2r+<w= �.a��2�� , �-��nroww� � �a�a�� wai� aE � 1-�-u°vi�Vx- a ti U � � � � E,,,, z � .� . � U '� � � r- � 3 � O " � � � a � +r� ti j � a W .Q F' :. a a(a .;, I 1, �_ ,� f THE MINUTES OF iHE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CWNCII OF JULY 25, 1977 TMe ReguTar Meetin9 of the Fridley City Council of July 25, 197� was calted to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee 7ed the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegi3nce ta the ftag ROLL CAIL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Counci7woman Kukawski, CounciTman Schneider, Mayor Nee, Councilman Hamernik, and Councilman Fitzpatrick MEMBERS ABSENi: None APPROYAL OF MINUTES: REfiULAR COUNCIL MEE7ING Of JULY 11, 1977; MOTION by Councilwoman Kukawski to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting af �°1Y 11. 1977• Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Naypr Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTIO—�N�a: MOTION by Councilman F{tzpatrick to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, YISITORS: ISLANDS pF pEq�E: the Islandseof Pea�eRFounda{wp�errHeestated his�crnments�werehheing�made,�notdas� a member ar official of the Foundation, but as a founder of the Foundation. He indicated last week there was an article in the Sun Newspaper about the Islands of Peace being apen to the public and felt it was time the Foundation said why the Islands of Peace should be open to the public. Mr. Witmes stated, from the bery beginning, the concept of the Islands of Peace was not to have an area that would be exctusively for the handfcapped. He felt, if this would bappen, it woutd be tragic as it Nould isolate the handicapped from other peop7e, He indicated, from the calls he has had over the last few weeks, the public and handicapped do not want the Islands of Peace to be used exclusively for the handicapped. He would like word to get around the Istands of Peace are not exclusively for the handicapped. Refeering to programs, Mr. Wilmes stated it was hard.to define. He stated a ulet/wd��was 6eing worked out by the University to seek out a program that.is best �suftab�le for the Islands of Peace. He felt suggestions should be canbined from the City staff and to work with all municipalities, through the Park and Recreation P�Pie. ta Provide the best programs for the handicapped and able bodied. He felt, when the�reception center is constructed, the Foundation is capable of undertaking the operaiion of the facility witb cooperation of the City. SiOP LI6HT - EAST RIVER ROAD AND OSBORNE ROAO: Ms. Mary Martin, 133 Stonybroak Way N.E., appeared befare the Council regarding the stop light at East Rtver Raad and Osborne Road, She inquired as to how the signalization was W be set up at thts�intersection and outlined the danger for pedestrians crossing at the intersection. '25 � I i i . j � i' I t j I I l. 127 RE6ULAR MEETING OP JULY 25, 1977 PAGE 3 �ineBi�NeNs Wt d�the�pro osed�news eeeschedule wouldaincrease hiskfeestbyn40%�and he felt that was a little high. Councilman�fitzpatrick stated he couTd live with a layover of a year in view of the State tax. However, he i�icated this then implies that costs haven't risen in the tast five years to which the Council is cognizant that they have, Councilman Hamernik inditated, in cansidering this ordinance, it woutd not go into effect until May of 1478 and this would be almost a year. He stated he wauld be in favor of the revised proposal with implenentation on the�a�iversary of renewal of the license. Councilman Schneider indicated he shared Cauncilman HamerM k's viewppint. He �stated�.the increase would rrot take effect untit next year and definitely would be - �-��irt�favor of the lower increase. Regarding the banquet facilities, he felt he �r0uld�be more comfortabTe with usirg less than four or five times per week, rather than three times per week. He felt, if action is not taken until next year, there � wauld�be a two year delay and it was not fair to the putrtic to take from the general fund to cover the cost of the licenses. Countilwpnan Kukowski indicated she would like to see the floor areas for the ata6lisMnents. She stateG she would be in favor of tabling this item until next ylar and felt uncamfortable wfth the increase in view of the action by_the State fn incrasing the tax. MO77pN by Councilman Hamernik tp waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon f9rst readi�ng. Seconded by Cour�ciiman Schneider. -MOTION 6y Councilman Hamernik to amend Lhe ordinance by dropping the base fee of � E500, arM s Wrting at the base of $4,500, for no entertairvnent, with increases to �4,750 and $5,000, depending ort square footage. The base�fee £or entertairenent ..and/or dancing would be $5,500 with increases of E5,750 and 56,000 tlepending on square� fooWge. Seconded by Counc9lwoman Kukowski. MOTIDN by Councilman Hamer�ik to amend the paragraph of the ordinance regarding banquet facilities by striking the word "tbree" and substituting the vrord "five," Seconded by Counciiman Schneider. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to add a paragraph to the ardinance which shall read as follows: "This fee schedule shall take effect on May 1, 1g7g,�� ge�ar�ded Counci7man Fitzpatrick. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE iHREE AMENDMENTS, all voting aye, Mayar Nee declared the aptSon carried unanimousiy. It was requested staff furnish an analysis of the impact of the new fees before second reading of the ordinance. UPON A YOICE YOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION to adopt the ordinance upon first readi�g, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motian carried unanimousTy, OROINANCE N0. 657 _ cno ��.,..�,. _----._ ardiradoDt ituonithe�secondareading a eCSeon edib Councilwanan Kukowski. �. Upon a�voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dectared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: - --- --•_� ��e r�amm �g Caimission recomneMed approval with a stipulation. Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated the stipulation was that traffic Srgress and egress on Mississippi P7ace only. Mayor Nee questioned how many units the R-3 zoning would accomodate. Mr. Sobiech stated up W eight, but seven would be most feasible. � i 1'L� REGULAR MEETIN6 OF JULY 25, 1977 8. That tfie driveway on East River Road not be used by custqners, 9. Sales af motorcycles and sirowmobiles be exc7uded. PA6E 5 Mr. Sobiech mentioned another stipulation which might be added is that the specla7 use permit be granted to the property owner for this particular use only. He stated the interpretation the sWff now uses� is that this special use �_ permit is for a particular use and if anyane else wanted to use.�tbe facility for Cou ncil� Howeverhaiftthe propertyW ere usedeforsthe same�typeaof disp aytthat is ^ow ProPased, it wauld rrot come back to the Councit. Xr. Herrick, City Attorney, agreed with the interpreWtion by the staff in this regard. �. ,� ProP rtyaavnerS�Mri� or9msbeckera 13401eSouthridgetRoad,WStated�hetes bnvolved 1n the'lease and the property owner is aware of the stipulations, and he does ' not think there.will be any protilems. Mdyor.Nee questioned the amount of square foatage to be used by the Apache Camp}ng Center. Mr. Sob9ech indicated they would be using about 4,000 square f�t in the rear of the buitding. Counci�lman Fitzpatrick indicated the request is for a particular use of a portion of the building and eventua7ly there would probably be a request for use of the renainirg �part of the 6uilding, Mr. Sobiech explained the zoning of the property is C-2S. Mayor Nee stated he personalTy dces not like the idea as he has a bad feelirg about display when they are trying to keep it as a residential area. He questioned if the neighborhood agreed to thls special use permit. Ns. Mary Martin, 133 Stonybrook Way N.E., felt the neigh6orhood reaiizes something She�stated�it is zoneducommerc9al,tand res�identialewouldbbetthetonlytbetter use. She indicated, as far as she is concerned, this business is probably not going to bring in a lot of people and the petitioner has agreed to only two vehicles in front of the building. She stated the residents are probably in agreement that this is the best possibte use at the moment. She requested an added stipulation that when the camping center is no longer in business, the special use permit would expire. MOTION by Counci7m�n Fitzpatrick to concur vrith the Planning Conmission and grant SP p77_pq W�th the nine stipulations as outlined in these minutes and I with the added stipulation that this permit is issued to Apache Camping Center and the special use permit shatl cease, if the use changes. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ANDREW EUqNS, SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP A77_07, 6040 BENJAMIN SiREfT: .� � Mr. Sobiech stated.this is a request for a special use permit to a71ow construction of a 27' x 24' attached garage to be used as an accessory building at 6040 BeRjamin Street. He stated the Plannirg Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of this request. bu11A9�9echHerexplained the�new building and drive�vaytw�ll�tietoff Ferndale Avenue. MQTION by Cauncilman Schneider to concur with the recorrmeroJation af the Plenning Commission and grant SP #17-07. Seconded by Councilwpnen Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all yoting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR MEETIt� OF JU�Y 25, �g77 Mr..Q�reshj, City Manayer� a�so felt there should-.be a �Y the tity v�uld allow a double burgalow on the lot, ta yrairted, PAGE 7 ciear identification on if the special use permit Mayor Nee stated he wished the P7anning tq�m;ssion had looked at the apptication f� this viewpoint. Mi'• Qureshi stated some of the things that makes this lot unique is the easements on the lot, size of the lot, and Kerry Lane exists directiy opposite to this lot. M07ION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recomnendation of the Planning Comnission and appro�e SP N77_pg because of � (2) the drainage ditch at the rear of the 7ot and the drainage easement on the i) the size of the lot in question; east sitle of the�lot; and (3) the unfque hardship of lights�from traffic on Kerry Lane shining on the tot. A further stipulation of the special use permit � °� substantial y Simj�yrytodihe�oneapresentedithis evenin Kukowski, Upon.a voi�ce vote, PProy�ng 9he Seconded�bh shall be carr9ed unanimously. all votirg aye, Mdyor Nee declared the nptionilwoman Pfayor Nee suggested perhaps the Planning Comnission shoutd review this section of the Zoning Ordinance. fro�NQ„rifkit wasaaerecommendationUOf the p�a��suC 99estion originally came MOTION by Councilwoma� Kukawski for the Plannin ��jssion. ��'d��ance with special consideration to the sectionnwhich�allarsecpnstruction�of a tvro famity dwelling in an R-1 zoning district. Seconded by Councitman Hamernik. Upan a voice vote, all voting aye, Ma,yor Nee dec)ared�the motion � Carried unanjmou5ly, P�s• Kar1a Larson, 7528 75th Avenue N.E., stated they woutd like t� constructian as soon as possible. Avenueband ArthurdStreet'on.theSSOUth side ofn76th Avenue. � Y lots between Central b�yCou�i�� Schne�i�derKukowon�atvoice votePuallcvotini a the rtqt}p� carried unanimo�s�y, �9 and publicize. Seconded 9 ye, Mayor Nee declared K.B.M. INVESTMCUr �,.. .._.__ � Mr. SobiecA explained this is a request for a�lot split gener 1Miy o ated between Onondaga-SYreet and 73rd Avenue. He stated the Planni this request and recomnended approval. He stated it was suggested to the petitioner that possibly add9tional � �000"75sion reviewed aRY�need for a variance. PHePStated�ihe petitionerdh d contacted hese�persons, but apparently there was no interest shown in selling the property. Mr. Haggerty app�rEy before the Cauncil regardinq this lot sp)ft. He stated the property, the way it exists iwMr, d�es present a hardshf Lakeside had gone through, they would have had a fairl with the vacation of the street, � P• Ne stated, if iodicated a variance wi17 there is a de th y decent lot; however, �prp�r# Probably be r P PrOb�e1"�Wfth the lot. He Y W the narth. e9�ested as the � Y coutd not obtajn additional �ION by Councilmao Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Canaission and grant LS A'77_07 r�ognizing that the two R- the 9,Opp Square.feet standArd arM�the development of the R- a:variance r 1 lots are less than wice vate, ajjeuot�� setbacks. Seconded by Councilwanan Kukowski.��po�Qa�re 9 aye, Mayor Nee dectared the motion carried unanimously. 1�7ION 6y Councilman Schneider tp receive the minutes of the Plannin Comnission Meeting of July 13, )g77. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. a11 votfng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried urw�9mpusly, 9 Upon a voice vote, isa i � I I I I I � I i � � i � I � I I ( I ; i� REGULqq MEETING OF JULY 25, 1977 ' ' PA6E g RESOLUTION N0. 71-1977 _ � NCE W .S 95RECCING Tf{E i55llANCE OF TEMPORARY iMPROVEMENT BONUS IA MOTtON by CounciTwoman Kukrnrski to adopt Resoiution No. 7�_797�. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all vating aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, RESOLUTION NO —�__. 72-1977 _ nte�..�..._ _.. MOTION 6y Councitman Schneider to adopt •� 72_ V•u�cry' Councflwaren Kukowski.� Upon a voice vote, a11 voti Motion Carried unani�p�s�y 197�• Seconded by ng aye, Mayor Nee declared the APPOINTMENT - HUMAN RESWRCES COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilrtyn Hamernik to nomir�ate�0avid 7hiele for a Humart Resources Comnission. Seconded by Councilwpman Kukowskf. PPOinhnent to the �unihjmas hemwould be aewel omehaddition totthea res�nne in februa Cauncilman Fitzpatrick stated he wished to bri ��ssion. �' of this year Counctlme�ers that Mr. Lar �9 it to the attention of the He�stated Mr. Chevalier ca�7ed him and has been very interested in becomin ry Chevalier had indicated an interest in any Comnission. active in City goverrment. He felt the Council should be aware of Mr. interest fn considerirg future a 9 more ihere being no other ��tja�sP��ents. Chevalier's > they �re closed by Mayor Nee. ��1 A VOICE V07E TqICEry ON THE ABpUE MOTION, a11 yotirg y e, the mption carried unanimousTy. Y Mayor Hee dectared _"MUernrn.�..... __ � . Nr. Sobiech stated — '"' '"° �v.e. at the rortheast corner of Cheri�Lane and�7th�Street�.P qers�tedsthe Metropolitan same form5ofulowncost�housing� a �OUSe trailer 9 contest ahere bui7ders compete to come up with Mr. Beckler has indicated be Nould tike to participate in this canpetition by displayT�y one of his mobiie hames on this site. Mr. huoe cou7d be allowed on a temporary basis, Sobieth stated this mobile r Councilman Scbnefder questioned for what �j� Council approval. � the license issued. Period of time Mr. � Beckler would like Mr. Beckler stated he xould like at least 90 da s, the competition,�he would like to have the mobile hanehonfthe premise5 for a -short period of.tirr�e, He ex lained they do well 9� on the exterior and the interior is. vhnylpc�ad sheetrock6with wood w9�dows. He felt, however,°6efore he went to the expense of � X 4a With masonite on the site, he would check further into the costs inyp)�ed and determine if it �rould be worthwhi7e. Porari7y putting the mobile hane Councilma� Fitzpatrick questioned if the residents in the area were aMare of this reque5t, Mr. Sobiech indicated�there.was no nptjpjcation on this r l i ceris e. equest for the temporary MO7ION 6y Counci7rtwn S�hneider to grant the tempurary house trai7er license with an expiration date�of Novemper �, �g�� a� request sWff to natif 14ikawski5 ��ppn atvoiceavoteatall votfng5aye,eMae� Seconded b unaniepusly. Y the immediate Yor Hee declaredCihecmot�onncarried � I i f I. I � I 133 i i I i � i I I � I � i 135 REGULAR MEETIN6 OF JULY 25, 1977 PA6E 11 fe7t there was a need for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program in the City Council authorize�thehs9�fyto�proceedrwithhthe�appl�caLion,nas heefelt�the�Cety couid commit some af the existing resources in this area. He stated, the�question on whether the Council wished to fund additional help and equipmen� is a policy matter. �� Mr. Qureshi stated Mr. Hitl's meiro noted that the letter to Mr. Boerner was merely � an exploratory letter, and that there would be significant changes, if the grant � . application is submi�tted. Mayor Nee stated the noimal procedure for this type of grant is that the Federal 9overrment eventuatly withdraws. Mr. Qureshi agreed that there would be same commitment on the City's part. MffTION by Councilman Hamernik to direct staff to proceed with Yhe grant application. Seconded by Counc�ilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote> all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Qureshi requested an indication from the Council if they are limiting themselves to the enistin9 resources or actuaity expandirg these resources. It was the general feeling of the Council, and based on�Mr. Hill's mertro, to proceed to try and arrarge a Selective Traffic Enforcenent Program with the existing personnel and resources and to cane back with a proposal for the Council's review. Councitman Hamernik comnented he felt, if any additional funds were to be budgeted, it would be in the equiqnent area. CONSIOERATION OF A RFtni urrnm oro��r,.,.. _.._ __...__ _ � �w�.�+�� ur �v int ASSESSMENT A7I0 EQUIRED BY LAW��"� vr rtcvtrvot �U BRING ALL ' �_.. MOTION by Counci7man Fitzpatrick to brirg this proposal back for the next Council ' meeting. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votirg aye, Mayor � Nee dectared the motion carried unanimously. NORTH70WN CORRIDOR HEARINGS: � I ihe Caurrcil requested the�City Manager to inform the League of Women Voters wt�en public hearings witl be held regarding the Northtarn Corridor. AWOUWAtENT: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adjourn the meeting. Secanded by Councilman SChneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of July 25, 1977 adjourned at 70:22 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad W111ian J, Nee Secretary tp tq¢ ��ty Council Mayor Approved: ,� r 136 iHE MINUTES Of�THE REGULAR P!EETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CWNCIL OF AUGUST 1, 1g77 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 1, 1977 was ca7led to order at 7:40 P.M. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of A7legiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• METI6ERS PRESENT: Councilwoman KukoNSki, Councilman Schne9der, Mayor Nee, Councilman Hamernik,.and Councilman Fitzpatrick , . ME!!BERS ABSENT: Nane APPROVAL----TES: PUBLIC HEARING MEETING UF JULY 18, 7g77; MOT;u �b,$Co1977�maSecondeddby CouncilwomanhKukowski5 �UponeaPvoice vote,�a�j�eting voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTIO--=EN�a: Mayor Nee requested an item be added at the end of the agertda, that is, "Response to the Question Raised Regarding the Liquor Store Sign,�� Councitman Schneider requested the order of the two items under No. 5 be reversed by "Receiving a Comnunication from the Charter Cwmiission in Regard to Code of Ethits°�and adding "Receiving the July 79, �g77 Minutes of the Charter Comnission and a portion of the July 19 Minutes of the Appeals Comnission Regarding This 7tem' and "Receiving Cormunicatio� from David Berg of the Charter Comnission." He requested "Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Establishing a Code of Ethics for City Officials" be considered after the other items were received. MOTIQN by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Counci7man �Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM VISI70R5: There was no response from the audience on this item. OLp BUSINESSi - . MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 658 and adopt it on the second reading and publish. Seconded by Gouncilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote> a77 voting�dye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. DRDINANCE N0. 659 - Fna cTOrrr ..�� MOTION by Counciiman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 659� and adopt it on the second reading and publish. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. � Upon a voice vote, a17 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE N0. 6�n _ aur�i�,.�.. ,......___ _ _ - --__...,� �«�: M�yor Nee asked if there was aRyone present this evenin9 who wished to comment regarding this item. There was no response from the audience. 138 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 1, 1977 PAGE 3 r �Pridley which.benefits by the improvement of lands within its boundaries; and (4) the railroad and utility canpanies who contribute sedimentation to the lake. He stated the entire costs shuuld not be placed on the Locke Lake property owners, however, alt do not enjoy or benefit equally fran the ]ake. He indicated the degree of benefit is subject to the determination of the Watershed District. He explained � the total estimated cost for the improvement is $171,500 and an example was submitted of how this assessment cost might be spread on the benefitted properties. Mr. McLennan, Engineer for the Rice Creek Watershed District, then reviewed the proposal for the improvement. It was proposed to increase�the depth of materials along the railroad tracts and the depths along the south shore of the lake and�to open up��the dam, to let.the water drain out, during the construction period. Mr. McLennan felt> by moving the materials and working in a dry take bed, the savings would be substantiat. He reviewed the proposal for a gabion wall with a . fflter,�to act as erosion protection. Mr. McLennan then revieaed the estimated � Costs and what steps would have to be taken for the improvement. He also reviewed the proposed method of assessment which would result in about 15% of the costs borne by the lakeshore property owners; 20% of the costs borne by the major erosion contributors; 50% of the costs from contributors of sediment through the storm system and about 75% of the costs borne by the City of Fridley. Mr. Petrangelo stated the total dcreage is 7,000 acres, however> this does ga to the outfalt of Long Lake in New Brighton or about 11 square miles. He indicated the lake would be about t�ro acres smaller with this improuement. Mr. Nerrick, City Attorney, questioned what cities are considered under the 2,390 acres of minor contributors. Mr. McLennan stated they would 6e Spring Lake Park, New BrighYon, and Fridley. Mr. Bert Yilm, 211 Rice Creek Terrace, felt the silt is atso damaging Rice Creek and felt improvement of the creek should be looked into. Nr. Petrangelo questioned what Mr. Wilm meant by improving Rice Creek. N.r. Wilm stated the removal of the sil�t. Mr. Petrangelo stated it is impossible to remove the silt as the scope of the problem is greater than Locke Lake itself. Mr. Wiim felt if.the dam was removed, Rice Creek would be back to where it was before the dam was constructed. � Me. McLennan felt, at the point where Mr. Wi7m is located, the�sediment would not be removed regardless if the dam was there or not. A gentleman located east of Mr. Wilm stated the lake dpes affect the creek in th9s area. Mr. Dick Schitlinger, 240 R9ce Creek Boulevard N.E., statad he lives directly east of the viaduct and that tne channel in back of his home has entirely filled in. He showed snapshots of his back yard taken in 1968, 1973, and this evening; in order to 5how how the creek has been filled. He stated, in 1968 you could clearly see the water level and now�trees have grawn. He agreed the problem is not only Locke Lake, but with the creek. He stated there previousiy were three channels into the lake and now there is only one as the other two have fi7led in canpletely. He stated he would like to see sanething done about this area at least up to University Avenue. I� Mr. Bob Hamilton indicated they were talking this evening.only fram the railroad tracks west. Mr. McLennan felt possibly some / I isenoaquestion that�LockerLake6doestgo a�little aybtoSthe�east about the portion of the area to He indicated there of the tracks. Ms. Sharon Bakke, President of the locke Lake Association, questioned how long this improvement vrould take. Mr. McLennan felt it would be too early to determine at this time. �He felt, if construction is started, he hoped the heavy construction -��activity could be done quite quickly, with possibly the replatting done next season. Ms. Bakke stated the Lity woutd benefit about 75%; however, she felt there would be more park area which in.turn, would benefit .the citizens of Fridley. Mr, McLennan t keeforathis�silt�to�buildSUp�agai�essMbleMcLennanastatedkepartWOf the�job,uwould I ,' i I 140° REGULAR MEETII� OF AtIGl1S? 1, 1977 PAGE 5 Ms. Bdkke stated, when the Association started this procedure, peop7e around Rice . Creek were asked to join them; hlwrever, only two people who lived :along the creek came to the meeting. She feels this is why the improvement is mainTy centered on the problem around Locke Lake. She�stated a week from this cani�ng Wednesday, there will be a meeting of the Locke Lake Association at the Library at 7:30 p.m. to discuss thSs matter and she invrted all interested persons to attend. Mayor Nee requested, by a show of hands, how many persons attending the meeting lived on Locke Lake. Fourteen actually lived on the lake; three persons were from east of the tracks; and five persons lived along Rice Creek. A gentlaian in the audience stated�he has deep resentment to have to be somewhere at a�certain time to protect his hanestead on which he is paying $2,000 in taxes. Mr. Bob Hense, 601 Rice Creek Terrace, stated the engineers admitted this would be a probtem that will re-occur. He felt tM s is strictly a private interest affair far persons on Locke Lake and stated he is against it. Mr. and Mrs. Carlson, 1399 66th Street N.E., made reference to the steep bank in back of their property which is approximately 40 feet fran the top of-the bank to ahoutasex feet1frrometheacreekh�Heesuggestedhwhy�nothput�addam�al naeCAntral�Avenue so he could have a lake in his back yard. Ms�. Bakke�stated she wished to thank the�Natershed District for their work on this � proposal. Mr. Petrangelo stated the problem should be addressed by the citizens of Fridley � and fett feedback should be submitted from the Locke Lake Association arrd other interested resideMS. He indicated he was disappainted more residents on��the creek were nat in attendance at this meettng, Ms• Yirginia Heffner, 580 Rice Creek Terrace N.E., auestioned if this would be put to a referendum. Mr. Petrangelo stated they would proceed through the public hearing process,�provided they received a petition from the Council. � who aret otaaware�of6whatCesCgoengTonrac5he stated�she was advised of theemeeting because her neighbor across the street received a notice. A gentleman who lives on Locke Lake felt, if�he wasn't on thelake, he wouldn't like to pay for.saneone else's problem. He asked if revenue from the 6enera7 Fund wutdn't be used�for this. The Council advised that revenues fram the General Fund were from taxes from the entire City. � � Mr. Nick Garaffa, 6750 Monroe Street N.E., spoke in favor of the project. He felt the,figure of $2,30 would be worth it for the general public. Mr. Herrick stated, speaking as a resident a7org the creek, it seems a good portion of the problem is that there is discussion about a s�gment of a problem and, log9cally, the total problem can be broken up into (1) Locke Lake; (2) Rice Creek fram Locke Lake to University; and (3) Rice Creek from University to the New Brighton limiEs. He stated he has no objection to the proposed assessment formula or for paying for Locke Lake, but would�feel better if he knew what the�City and Watershed � DSstrict is goiny to do about the other segments of the problem, He indicated he � did not see the�reverse happening where the property owners downstream would pay for imprnvements to Rice Creek from�University to New Bri9hton: He felt if the residents knew what the planning was for the other seaments af the creek, it may � be easier to comnit themselves to this improvement. � Mr: Mclennan stated, if there was an fmprovement for preventing erosion on Rice Creek and any tax or assessment is levied, it would, by logic, have to include the Lacke Lake area because erosion from Rice Creek would be prevented and; therefore, not contribute to the�sediment in Locke Lake. i 142 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUSi 1, �g77 �� j I PAGE 7 . Mr, Sobiecb exp7ained, if�the app7��ant had purchased the�lot and developed it before Apri) 25, 1975, he would not have had to apply for a variance. 3. The dimension variance does not allow any use that is not a canpatible use in the land use district in which the property is located. Mr. Sobiech explained th9s would be a residential use and the zoning is proper. 4. 7he dimension variance will not alter the essential charac'ter of the locality as established by these Interim Oevelopment Regulations. Mr: Sobiech stated this variance would npt be a variance that wilt hamper the . cutes�of�the Interim Development Regutations. � � 5. The dimension variance will not be contrary to the Order. Hr. Sabiech indicated this variance will not be contrary. Mr. Sobiech pointed out,. it was discussed in length at the Appeals Comnission meeting, that this property is difficult to build on. He staied the awner is aware of the P�lens.associated with tbis lot and, therefore, any erosion problems�in the future evelh9s 822 anddthetproposed fputP^yPelevatWOn willrbes82qech stated the flood Mr. Netz explatned the house wi11 probably be built with footings at 824, with a three-story configuration frnm the back and a ls�-story canfiguration- fram the street. He explained his ptan for terracing the lot in order to hold the slopes. Mayor Nee questioned Mr. Netz if he was willing to live with alt the possible disasters �•pointed aut in tbe Appeals Comnission minutes. ��Mr. Netz stated he doesn't think he wi17 have any problems. He stated he is building and�ter�acinguwi7jntakeecare oftthe problem�t Mr�dNetzdfelta by�developi gs{he�lot, there would be 7ess earth into the river, than by leaving it vacant. Councilman Fitzpatrick felt they had to take the advice fran the City administration that the lot is buildable. Mr. Sobiech felt that proper ¢onstruction methads witl have to be fol7owed, the property owner must maintain the slopes, and acquire permits from the DNR and Corps of Engineers. Councilman Fitzpatrickfelt these stipulations are already provided for in the building regulatians. Mr. Sobiech felt the stipulation the Council may wish to state is that Hr. Netz is respo�ible for the erosion control. Councilman Schneider stated he was concerned � a6out a future liability with the City, regardless of ownership, if erosion occurs. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt�this could be handled in the manner of putting a stiputation to the variance regardirg erosion. �� Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, felt, in this particular situation, tAe property owner � shoutd provide a substantial type of retaining structure for protection of the property, He fett the standards of 822 might be too law and possibly they could be affected by a fload. MOTION by Countilman Fitzpatrick to grant the variance of the Interim Development Regulattons for the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area, as requested by Mr. Netz, and outlined on Page 8 of the.agenda book, with the stipulation that the property avner understands that it i�s his responsibility to prevent erosion fran his property into the creek and river. SecoMed by Cou�ilman Hamernik. Mr. A7ex Barna, 560 Hugo Street N.E., stated he was speaking as a member�of the � public and rrot as a member of the Appeals Commission. He pointed out the purpose of the Interim Development Regulations and questioned if the Council had considered (1) erosion; (2) the fact that the house will be build over the blufftine, (3) the ' I . I i i I ; 1 _. 144 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 1, 1g77 PAGE g Section 30.32, Subdivison 1(3), 1Snes 3-5: On line 3, add the words "he or she kirows" after the word "which." Om line 4, chanqe the word "has" to "having." On line 5, eliminate the words "of more than 10 percent of the tontrolling interest of" and add t e wor "in" at the end of this line, Section 30.33, Subdivision 7, line 2: Add the words "as a public record" after the vrord "ffle." SECONDEO by Councilwoman Kukowski. Councitman Hamernik questioned the enforcement of this ordtnance. He felt by some of the wording, they are leaving toopholes and probably making it very difficult to enforce. He stated the Planning Commission had a very lengthy discussion�regarding this matter at their meeting. MOTtON by Councitman Hamernik to tatile tbe first reading of this ordinance until , the-proceedings from the Planning Commission are obtained for their input. .Motian failed for lack of a second. �� Councilman Schneider stated all caimissions received a notice regarding this ordinance and doesn't particularly feel they�have a problem as far as comnission manbers krawing about.it. He indicated this woutd be a first reading and�if there are additional comnents, they would be received before the second readirg. . Councitman Schneider stated the Appea�ls Commission voted unanimously to concur and the letter from David Berg concurs, basically, with the ordinance. He indicated in � the letter received from the Charter Comnission, the primary objection is that the ordinance should be a part of the Charter. He stated he.wouid encourage the Charter Caimission to go ahead and add some provision to the Charter to cover this. Councilman Schne9der stated at least four members of the Council should be aware that a code of ethics ordinance is suppprted by the Danocratic Party for openness in goverrment. Enforcanent, he felt, would be difficult as are many other City ordinances Councitman Namernik stated he felt he made his position very clear_he is not trying to hide anythin9. He indicated his otijections are due io tne unworkability and cum6ersomeness of the ordinance which, in his opinion, could be handt.ed in a more simple fashion and obtain the same results. He stated he di�sagreed with the comment �that the letter from the Charter Comnission had only one major:point. He reads the letter�as containing seven major points, aside from saying tbat�it should be handled by the Charter Cortenission. He indicated he would�like the input fran the Planning Comnission as�they held tbeir meeting priar to the deadline of August 1, and felt, in a11 fairness, their comnents should be heard. He questioned.the rush to adopt the ordinance and why it coulAn't be tabled for two weeks. Councilman Fitzpatrick felt the motion was for tAe first reading and they will�have � time to receive input from the�Pianning Comnission before the�second reading. Councitman Fitzpatrick stated he agreed with Councilman Hamernik and Councilman Schneider that this admittedly would be a difficult ordinance to enforce. Councilwoman Kukowski stated she agreed with Councilman Fitzpatrick's comnent that it is importent to receive input from the Comnission; however, this information would be received before the second reading. Mayor Nee stated he recalled the letter tu the Commission mgnbers was to receive comnents, not as a Comnission as a whole, but individual manbers' comments. Councilman Fitzpatrick indicated he hadn't discvssed the Charter Comnission letter, but felt tAere is time to consider any inpui that hasn't yet been received. � Councilman Hamernik stated, as he reca77ed the letter submitted to tAe Cortmissions, gave them tbe option of either indiv9duat comnents ar cortments from the Comnission as a wlale. 1 14G REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1977 PAGE 11 — j Councilman Fitzpatrick indicated he has no objection to the other approach as he � felt they were also tlealing with two�different tbings. . , Councilman Schneider indicated one thing that disturbed him about the meter cards ' is that it says to return this card irtonediately, and questioned if there could be � a date when it should be returned. . �� Mr. Brunsell stated, he belieyed, there was a date when the card should be returned. I It was felt.the staff should re-draft the ordinance, based on the comments made.- �' MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to refer the ordinance back to administration for revision and to be brought 6ack at their discretion. Seconded by Councilwoman ; Kukowtki. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried ananimnusly, RESOLUTION N0. 73-1977 _ RFrn�ccTtnur_ ru� �,..........._..__ __ _. ' � MO7ION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 73-1977, Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dectared the iaotion carr9ed unanimously. MO7ION by Councilwoman Kukqwski to adopt Resolution Na. 74-1977. Seconded by , Councitman FStzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ! LICENSES: — 1 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the ticenses as submitted and as on file ' in the License Clerk's Office_ SecorMed by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice rote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanirtausly. ' ESTIMATES: � � E. A, Hickok & Associates, Inc. 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN 55391 PARTIAL Estimate k3 Moore Lake Evaluatian and Restoratton Project S2>280.61 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted. Secouded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a.voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the notion�carried unanimously. � . . CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to authorize payment of Claims No. 200531 through 204874. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � LIOUOR SiORE SIGN: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to change the sign to eliminate the biinking lights. Sewnded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, � a FIRE DEPARTMENT : MEMORANDUM DATE: August 15, 1977 MEMO T0: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager FROM: Robert D. Aldrich, Deputy Fire Chief /t,. dv�- RE: Burning Permit - Girl Scout Council y �'LLL: �is I appreciate the lateness of this request but perhaps you could place this rec}uest for a waiver of the fee for a burning permit before the Council at toM ght's meeting. Their permit has beett approved by the P.C.A., and they indicated that they are ready to burn the felled trees. It it is alt possible, I wauld rather see this burning accanplished 6efore the drler fall weather sets in and increases the burning hazard. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. RDA:eI Attachments - 2 F" C'jREATER . MINNfAPpi15 � C�IRL SCOUT COUNCI� 20D Garham Building �.127 North 7th Street • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 • Ph (612) 338-072t �uguat 12, 1977 Fi�i.d].ey Fire Department . FMdley City.Hall 6431 NE Un3.versity Ave. Fridley� I+&'i• 55432 Gentlemen We have received ward that it is necessary for us to remove many diseased trees at our Cemp Lockeslea (69pp � River Rd.), Our camp caretakers are currently yor� on cutting them down, We are requesting tha,t you ttaiye the �50.Op fee for a bttrning Per— mit. We have sut�mitted ottr request for the permi.t already, As you proDabl,p l�ow� we rely on the co�unities for £inancial support for our prog�.am� We did not anticipate tkat we Would have to remove as many,treea as we have had to; therefore� our budget has been bad],y stretched. We would appreciate your coasideration in this matter. If you have a�p questions, please fee1. free to call me, Thank you. Si,pcerely� : . �� Peg� 1 ickson Business Manager cc Jennette A, Gudgel, Executive Director - PARTtALIY FUNDED BY TME UNITED WAY PERMIT NUMBER 789-8-77 DATE OF ISSUANCE August 9, �977 EXPIRES ON � SEPTEMBER 15, 1977 Minnesotp Polfution Control Agency 612/296-7300 PERMIT FQR- OPEN BURNING� ier t�e}p�ovisions of Minnesota Air Pollution Control Requlation �'$� permission is hereb y granted to: NA�YE MARV VOGEL6ESAN6 ' TEL.NO. 472-2776 (H) �pRBSENTING 6REATER MPLS. G(RL SCOUT COUNCIL �DRE.'S3 - �27 N• 7th Stre n � to conduct open burninq at �AMP LOCKESLES in the County of for the purpose of Anoka ty, 6900 East River Road / 1VWqJ1Y�,Y� disposal of diseased shade trees and trtmm:rv GB) s ONLY This permit is limited to the conditions Iisted on the reverse side. The recipient of this permit shall comply with all other state and local laws regarding open burning, including obtaining the required permits. This permit is issved with the knowledge and recommendation of a lo- cal fire authority or local governmental authority havinq jurisdiction in the area where the burning is to occur as £ollows: NAME TITLE Depty Fire ChiefTEL.NO 57_ f�3qsp��75 LDR CH ADDRESS 6431 University Ave. NE street Fridfey MN 55432 (czty, state, ziP code RJM/� - —=� m�c•�.cJ � AUTHORIZED REPREggNTATIVE of EDWARD M. WIIK. P.E. Director Division of Air Quality 1935 West County Road 62, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 R69��o1 Otlices • D�tuth / 8rainerd / Fergus Falls/ Marshalt / Rochesteri Roseville • E9�AI pppa�niy Employer ' . . g)3MIT FOR OPEN BURNING .. _'_`------------------- Page_ 2_- '� HjS PERt•1IT SS LIMITED Tp Tg�, ^JLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1j The prevailing wind at the time of the burning shall be away from nearby residences. 2� T�e �burning shall be conducte� as far away as practical from any h�.ghway or public road and controlled so that a traffi.c hazard is not created. 3) The location of the burning sha21 not be within 600 feet of an occupxed residence other than those located�on � oroperty on wisich the burning is conducted. h1 The burninq sha12 not be conducted within one mile of any airport or landing strip, unless appraved by the Director. • �� O1�S, rubber and other sinilar smoke producing materials sha21 not be burned or vsed as starting materials. 61 The recigient of the permit or his authorized representative shall be present for the duration of any fire authorized by the ge�it. 7) Prior notice shall be given to the local fire authority of the time and 2ocation of any fire authorized by the permit. �3 �trsy fire allowed by this permit shall be extinguished within four (4) hours of a public announcement by the Minnesota Pollution Confrol Agency that an air pollution alert, warning or,emergency exists. Such burning SHALL CEASE until a si.nilar . announcement terminating the alert, warning or emergenqy. �)f This permit is subject to revocation at the discretion of the Director, a D�R Forest Officer, the Iocal fire authority or the permit issuer if: . a) A reasonable, practical method of dis J is found; Posal of the material b) A fire hazard exists or develops durinq the course of the burning; or c) Any of the conditions of the permit are violated during the course of t�e burning. ��) Other reasonable conditions the per,nit issuing authority may i impose. td?/bm CITY OF FRLDLEY PETITI�N CpyEg SkiEET it l . . . _. _ ;_ ,t__. . �a.;..: Petition No, ��_ ' Daxe Received AI19USt �5, 1477 objecc In opposition to a temporary M�bile kome license that was granted bY the Council at their July 25, 1977 meeting to Reed Beckler for display purposes. Petieion Checked By Percent Signing Referred to City Council Diaposition `_ -----_. Date WL, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE FRIDLEY COUNCILS ACTIONS OF JULY 25. �977_ WHEP A q'EL�QgARY N�BILE HOML LICENSE WAS GRANTED TO . REEB BEC[d.ER, FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES. � .. � � / C J � . ...... . . ... ` . . .... � vt�-c' a �, 2 ' -,y �3 3 ` � j '� �/� , , r . ,. `�ic `" �- [`""'�" S� - — ;%) , , - - .S. C�2C�_ `��/,� /G�F' '�_`" �..-� ° �-� � 3 _. - - 7 ' �--�..��:— ��—,ti.a_ �;' . � ��"`s`�.��:.��. _ . - -:=%.. _ .7�� 'i'z��.�.��,� 7��' �/'� �� . _._ � �'�r�.s�., �/% - `�il.�t.t2�-C, _ S;G� __ � � �a�.� �� .�� << ci-nc�-r_ `" � . -, _ _ ��` � �..�'� `� � , � /1 / �,j��; �� C C�`� �� '"' �:�""��- � l��"✓"%��" f�.i �/;� ``_ , a -� � , �� c r� � �� ?�'.�-;, .°rr/�2 �.1C� , < � �� 5��'�� „ , � . � _ _ � '� ` � �� `-� �..��i ��rf� � ��,��:;� �� ' G ' !� t �ffY+'�-�� /� /�� .. . �� -�lF' C-�"C�Lt � �-�/L GC'o ✓/..C° � �A.v ,-'• }i� �'� A ! .v+�'� _�- . . . _ � � 7 � :�� y� � �' `9 �`{(��jj�^Y j�. /� 4 / � ; "� �~� ' . -� . . .. '� _�!" ��,\� � �1..(� . �[� { • � . . .. . . . J� . �s-��.� �,�2 � y�G �� ` N _ r ""`_7 ... . L > , . Z_ . � . _ __.. .... � -�"�J��'�, Q Y!7 �� r . �� ' _ . -� �� , . � , :- _ ,� r`- �, ��-.�� Cjc�,��' � 5 � 7,� ` . � . ,,�� ?. /. - � �-�".. "� �t �` � �' '`. ,�" � •�iLGl7--iL L� � � �` . � .. i'� . 5� � � ...� . � � r -� ; � . , ,I��GZc'.L. ° �,ri-�.� ,% � �' ` " ``�.� � J% �'? '� / ��G'—� a: � � �� , : L� L�f"G-'L�c.-L �Ci/',�-� G'�' f � :..:'".` /`�r ''��c �' . % ^ � ., _ . . . /.l'/ ` i ' ',�� `rc, .«- �-��`._ �f%` �` �' ,�� , � � � , ` •-2 � c'��c� r— -� :i /' �/� ��}��j (��j'y/� '� % .-.l � f C� �L-G i c. i � . 's"/ � �. 1'li� �'� `'f�'GL-��s��71 ,. ." � � . . . . . . .. . .. L = c/�f L ��'� c"' � / . c�( _ 1,.,/� � � � - . � . ii ' �_ �C_' � �� l j 7_'C" . �� 4,.:CG�=rx• CL4?�L-�-�-/��.:�.� �-,' % (�� r /�..� \� / ` ,� 2<- !'t cZ, 4� �� \ �L��,��V .��.,� / ``—� `�U 7 L �� '1��, �. �'�- ; ti:��.✓ `S3 Z . _. '��, C-�'� « ca�� l/':�..�, . s� a C'�, C:u.�_e.�,., �-� C� �- ��-> �y � , � �:��e �: ., ^ — —v�-u�,l,.r.� � T!/ C�?�c� ��,, ,.7�.,� . � _ _ G,� -�.-�.�� -- or•.-�?r._ 1. oj-- t f/�' oCr' ze _ n� � • _ . �� . �� . , . 5„ . .,_,C ___. C'��'tt�.�rr ` �,�,�-< ��(CLiYc� �� '�y�i ��., ��.,,._:.�� _ __ _ _ ��v-��-�-m� %�� —� � Q-�1�� ,�-�-z..e._ � � `-. �z `��-� n/% , , �{ «,�,.c� � �� '�� /`�X� �',, �'. � : �"-�� - �s:�a C,� _ / �p � ��. ��, � � . . . . . �iti��[.�, . � y . . .. .., F- ..� �..,,� (.� f � � �`'31 7/7� .ST GV �-�, _ 2 �i //� (: � T- �<«-4 -� ��-.�_ __ __ __ _. ._ �' Yes «�-� ,� f " b �, -�- �,�, t �, �� . . � /�y�:/ <<�� TO FROM: CITY OF FRIDLEY MEtdORANDUM NASIM M. QURES4I, CITY I�1ANA6ER, AND CITY COUNCIL MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY M6R./FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 402 OF THE CITY CODE CONCERNINr, METER REATIN6 AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES DATE: AU6UST 10, 1977 The Council considered an ordinance at its last regula-r Council meeting which would have increased the charge to $1.00 per quarter from $.50 for those customers not returning their meter reading cards. '.de have prepared another ordinance for the Council's consideration. � We have left the dollar charge per quarter in the proposed ordinance. We have added a� additional $5.00 charge for those custaners not returning the card for three consecutive quarters, thereby, making it necessary to send a man out to read the meter. Large caamercial accounts are read every quarter by the Public'Aorks men of course.. The proposed ordinance will at least give the Council some alternatives to consider. � � This item was brought before the Council primarily for the purpose of enacting an ordinance change which would encourage customers to return their meter cards. This is our primary concern, not the amount of time 1 it takes to estimate bills, or recouping the cost of sending a man out to read the meter, although, this is also a concern. The desirable effect of any ordinance change would be a change which would encourage customers � to return their meter card for all quarters, or at least with very few misses. � � ' � To give the Council some idea of the scope of the problem, in July 3,353 reading cards were mailed. Of this total, 373 custaners did not return their cards, and it was necessary to send a public Works man out on 93 of the accounts to read the meter. MCB:sh 1 , ORDINANCE N0. 1 A I , RN ORDINANCE AMEPIDING SECTION 402 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CONCERNING METER READING AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION 402,07, of #he Fridley City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 402.07 Meter Reading and Payment for Seruices The Gity may provide a system of water meter reading by post card, meterman, or any other method deemed suitaule to the purpose by the Council. The City may also establish billing areas or districts and provide for the readings of ineters and billing of charges by calendar quarters or monthly quarters, or such periodic intervals as the Council shall determine suitable and necessary from time to time to.the needs of the City. In the case of a post-card meter reading, each con- sumer sMall mail or return the meter card on or before the last day of the billing period. . Each consumer shall be assessed a�#€�y-�yg�_Eep� one dollar ($1 00) penalty for any card not returned on the due date. Such penalty and any use charges (based on an estimate of the water consumed) may be included on the next billing and there- after until paid. The water rate charges shall be considered net charges and shall be the charges payable before the last day of the month or billing period in which the 6illings are sent out. Payments not paid within thirty (30) days from the date of the bill will be assessed a ten (10) per cent penalty. PASSED AND ADOPTEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF > 1977. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell First Reading: Second Reading: Published: MAYOR William J. Nee �� I � ' ' f ' , ' ' , � ' �e� a ., .. �� ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTEP. 30, A CODE OF ETHICS FOR CITY OFFICIAI.S THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 30.01 Po_ licY Subdivision 1., General Declaration of Polic . It is necessary that all persons acting in the public service not only maintain hi.gh standards of ethical conduct in their transaction of public business but that such standards be clearly defined and known to the public, as well. as to the persons acting in public service. In recognition of this goal, there is hereby established a code of ethics for public officials, elected and apnointed, and for top level city employees. The purpose of this code is to establish ethical standards of conduct ior such officials and city employees by setting forth those acts or actions that are incompatible with the best interests of the city and by directing disclosure by such persons of private, financial, or other interests in matters affect- ing the city. Svbdivision 2, Definition of Top Level City Emplo ees. As used in this chapter, the term top level city employee shall include the city manager, the city attorney, department heads, and any other city employees designated by the city manager. Subdivision 3. Definitition of Financial Interest. As used in this chapter, the term financial interest shall be deemed to include ownership of more than 5% of: The outstanding stock in a corporation, an interest in a partnership, proprietorship, or other business entity, or an interest in real property. Financial interest shall apply to real or personal properties owned by the person making the disclosure and by said person's spouse. Subdivision 4. Definition of Personal Interest. As used in this chapter, the term personal interest shall be deemed to apply �ahen- ever a person required to make a disclosure under this code of ethics shall be associated with a business as an employee, officer, director, trustee, partner, advisor or consultant. SECTION 30.10 Scope of Peraons Covered The provisions of th� code of ethics shail be applicable to all members of the city council and the following advisory bodies: Planning Commission, Community Development Commission, Appeals Commission, $arks and Recreation Commission, Env3ronmental Quality Commission, Human Resources Commiss3on, Cable Television Commission and Housing and Redevelopment Authority. SECTION 30.20 Fair and Equal Treatment Subdiv�n 1, Subject to the provisions of subdivision 2 below, no person covered by this code of ethics shall participate in �the ,F L Page 2 discussion of, or vote on, any issue in whi.ch he or she has any financial interest. Subj2ct to the provisions of subdivision 2 below, no top level city employee shall recommend, advise, or in any manner influence the vote of the city council or any advisory body on any issue in which he or she has a financial interest: Subdivision 2. No person covered by this code of ethics shall take any official action with respect to a matter in which he or she has a financial or personal interest, provided that participation in the decision-making process on his or her behalf as a private citizen sha11 not be proscribed by this code of ethics, and provided further that he or she may participate in matters leading up to or preliminary to official action to the extent that he or she disclosed any such direct financial or personal interest as he or she may have in the same and to the extent that he or she has no discretion to make a final controlling judgment or vote on the same. Disclosure of any such financial or personal interest shall be made to the council, commission, board, or committee of wliich the person is a member or, in the case of a top level city employee, to the city manager, when the item appears on the agenda. Such disclosure shall be recorded in the minutes and shall become a matter of public record. Subdivision 3. T]o persor. covered by this code of ethics shall, without proper legal authorization, disclose confidential informa- tion concerning the propert}, government, or affairs of the city, nor shall he or she use sucn infonuation to advance the financial or other private interests of any person. ' Subdivision 4. No person covered by this code of ethics sha11 directly or indirectly solicit any gift or accept or receive any gift of substance, whether in the form of money, services, loan, ' travel, entertainment, hospitality, promise or any other form, under circumstances in which it could be reasonably inferred that ' the gift was intended to influence him or her or could reasonably , be expected to influence him or her in the performance of his or her official duties or was intended as a reward for any official action on his or her part. The provisions of this subdivision , shall not apply to political gifts that conform to the limitations prescribed by Minnesota Statutes for said gifts. Subdivision 5. Except as specifically authorized by Section 471.88 of the Minnesota Statutes, no person covered by this code of ethics who is authorized to take part in any manner in making any sale, lease, or contract in his or her official capacity shall have a direct financial interest in that sale, lease, or contract or per- sonally benefit financially therefrom. SECTION 30.30 Public Disclosure Uy City Council Subdivision 1. Within 30 days after the effective date of this code of ethics, each member of the city council shall file, as a public record in'the office of the city clerk, a signed statement disclosing the following: �;� _ _ .._ � �=Ys 2A �`: � : ,� . ' ' ' ' ' . ' � , ' ' Page 3 (1) A list of the names of all business corporations, partnerships, other business enterprises, or governmental. agencies doing business with the City of Fridley or located within the City of Fridley: (a) with which he or she has a financial interest, or (b) with which he or she has a personal interest; (2) A list of the non-homestead real property located within the City of Fridley in which he or she currently has a financial interest; (3) A list of the non-homestead real property located within the City of Fridley in �ohich he or she had a financial interest within the preceding three years; (4) A list of the names� and nature of business, of all corpora- tions, partnerships, or other business enterprises with which he or she has a financial interest and in which he or she knows one or more other persons covered by this code of ethics also having a financial interest in said enterprise. This list shall indicate the name or names of such otfier person or persons having such interest in said enterprise. Subdivision 2. Each person who files as a candidate to become a member of the city council, or is filed as a candidate for city council on the effective date of this code of ethics, at the time of filing as a candidate or wizhin 30 days of the effective date of this code of ethics, shall also file the disclosure statement required by this Section 30.30. Subdivision 3. Within 30 days after each anniversary date of an ' initial filing, each person required to make such a filing under this Section 30.30 shall file a new disclosure statement setting forth the information required hereby as of the time of the new statement. � � LJ tl , Suhdivision 4. Material changes in financial interest or in positions held shall be disclos'ed by filing an amended disclosure statement within 30 days after such interest is obtained or such changed position occurs. SECTION 30.31 Puhlic Disclosure by Members of Adviso Bodies Subdivision 1. Within 30 days after the effecCive date of this code of ethics, each member of any commission or committee shall file, as a public record in the office of the city clerk, a signed statement disclosing the following: (1) A list of the names of all business corporations, partnerships, other business enterprises, or governmental agencies doing business with the City of Fridley or located within the City of Fridley: (a) with which he or she has a financial interest, or (b) with which he or she has a personal interest; (2) A list of the non-homestead real property located within the City oi Fridley in which he or she currently has a financial , 3ntereat; i i ,, 2 3 : `I ; �. � • 1 , ' , ' . Page 4 Subdivision 2. Each person who is appointed or reappointed to an advisory body which is included in this cade of ethics shall file the disclosure statement within 30 days of such appointment. ' Subdivision 3. *faterial changes in financial interest or in positions held shall be disclosed by filing an amended disclosure statement within 30 days after such interest is obtained or such changed position occurs. , SECTION 30.32 ' � ' � � ' ' , closure bv Ton Level Ci Atto Exc Subdivision 1. Within 30 days after the effective date of this code of ethics, and annually thereafter, the city manager, department heads, and other employees designated by the manager, except the city attorney, sha21 file as a public record in the office of the city clerk a signed statement disclosing the followiag information: {1) A list of the names of all business corporations, partnerships, other busi.ness enterprises, or governmental agencies doing business with the City ot Fridley or located within the City of Fridley: (a) with which he or she has a financial interest, or (b) with which he or she has a personal interest; (2) A list of the non-hamestead real property located within the City of Fridley in which he or she currently has a financial interest; (3) A list of the names,and nature of business, of all corpora- tions, partnerships, or other business enterprises with which he or she has a financial interest and in which he or she knows one or more other persons covered by this code of ethics also .` having a financial interest in said enterprise. This list shall indicate the name or names of such other person or persons having such interest in said enterprise. Subdivision 2. Each newly-hired manager or department head, except the city attorney, shall within 30 days of the hiring date, and annually thereafter, file the disclosure statement required by this Section 30.32. Subdivision 3. Material changes in financial interest or in positions held shall be disclosed by filing an amended disclosure statement within 30 days after such interest is obtained or such changed position occurs. SECTION 30.33 Public Disclosure by City Attorney Subdivision i. Within 30 days after the e,ffective date of this code of ethics, and annually thereafter, the city attorney shall file as 2C 2D Page S a public record in the office of the city clerk a signed statement disclosing the following information: (1) A list of the names of all business corporations, governmental agencies, companies, firms or partnerships, or other business enterprises doing business with the City of Fridley, or located within tha City of Fridley, in which he or she has any financial interest, except that clients of the city attorney's private law practice shall be excluded from the list, provided that no other business relationship except that of attorney/client exists; {Z) A list of the non-homesCead real property located within the City of Fridley in which he or she currently has a financial interest. Subdivision 2. The city attorney, or members of his or her law firm, shall not appear before the city council, commission, or committee for the purpose of representing any client, except the City of Fridley or employees of the City of Fridley, when such latter representation is in connection with their official duties as city employees. Snbdivision 3. Any person who is appointed or hired as city attorney shall, witl�in 30 days of said•appointment, and annually thereafter, file the disclosure statement required by Chis Section 30.33. Suhdivision 4. Material changes in financial interest or in property holdings shall be disclosed by filing an amended disclosure statement within 30 days after such change occurs. SECTION 30.40 Exclusions This code of ethics shall not be construed to require the filing of any information relating to any person's connection with, or interest in, any professional society or any charitable, religious, social, fraternal, educa- tional, recreational, public service, civic or political organization, or any similar organization not conducted as a business enterprise, nor sha21 disclosure be required hereby where prohibited by professional or business association ethics promulgated by any state agency. SECTION 30.50 Method of Filing ' The city manager shall inform each person required by this code of ethics to file a disclosure statement of the time and place for filing. The city clerk shall prepare the necessary forms for the disclosure statements. The ' city manager shall made available to the �iry council, or individual council members, copies of all disclosure statements filed within 14 days after said filing. The ciCy manager shall notify the city council whenever a person � who is required by this chapter to file a disclosure fails to do so. SECTION 30.60 Violations Any violation of the provisions of this chapter is a misdemeanor and is subject to all penalties provided for such violations under the provisions of Chapter 901 of the Fridley City Code. ,o , Page 6 'L E PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS , DAY OF , 1977. ' - MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE ' . ATTEST: ' , . CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL ' First Reading:_ Augus't 8 1977 , Second Reading: Publication: ' � ' , ' , , � ' ' 1 1 . ; . : � � , I ' 3 Ordinance No� AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING CNAPTER 214 ENTI7LED SIGP�S, AND REPEALING PRIQR CHAPTER 214 ENTITLED SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS The City Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTIOPI 214.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to protect and promote the general PURPOSE welfare, health, safety and order within the City of Fridley through the establishment of a comprehensive and impartial series of standards, regulations and procedures governing the erection, use and/or display of deviees, signs or symbols serving as a visual communicative media to persons situated �aithin or upon public right of ways or properties. The provisions of this cfiapter are intended to encourage creativity, a reasonable degree of freedom of choice,.an opportunity for ef- fective communication, and a sense of concern for the visual amenities on the part of ihose designing, displaying, or otherwise utilizing needed comnunicative media of the types regulated by this chapter; while at the same time, assuring that the public health and welfare is not endangeredo SECTION 214.02 DEFINITIONS The following definitions shall apply in the inierpretation and DEFINITIGNS and application of this chapter and the following words and terms wherever they occur in this chapter are defined as fol7ows: 1. ABANDONED SIGN means a sign which no longer correctly directs or exhorts any person, advertises a bona fide business, lessor, owner, product or activity conducted or product available on � the premises where such sign is displayed. 2. ACCESSORY USE means a use which is subordinante to the principle use being made of a parcel of land. Examples: Identification sign, off-street loading, telephone booth, ete. 3, ADVERTISING SIGN means a sign which is used to advertise products, goods or services, • 4o ADDRESS SIGN means a sign with identification numbers only, whether written or in numerical form. ' 5. ALTERATION refers to any major change to a sign, excluding routine maintenance, painting or change of copy of an existing signe 6. AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN means a sign which identifies the name of a neighborhood, a residential subdivision, a multiple residential complex, or a business area. 7, BANNERS AND PENyANTS means attention getting devices of paper, cloth, or plastic like consistency and which are of a temporary nature (including small plastic flags, grand opening signs, or special announcements). 8. BEF�CN SIGN means a sign which is affixed to a bench, such as a bus stop, , Ordinance No. 9. BILLBOARD means an advertising sign which directs attention , to a business, commodity, service, or entertainment, not related to the premises at which the sign is located, or to a business, corranodity, service or entertainment which is conducted, sold ' � or offered elsewhere than on the premises of which the sign is located. 1Q. CANOPY means a roof-like structure projecting over any entrance of a store, building or place of assemblye il. CHANGEABLE COPY SIGN (MANUAL) means a sign which copy is ' changed manually in a fi-eld,i.ea, reader boards with changeable letters or changeable pictorial panels. , ' ' 12. CHAN6EABLE COPY SI6N (AUTOMATIC) means a sign such as an electronically or electrically controlled time, temperature and date sign message center or reader board, where different copy changes are shown on the same lamp bank. 13. CONSTRUCTION SIGN means a sign placed at a construction site, identifying the project or the name of the architect, engineer, contractor, financier or other invoived parties. 14. DIRECTIONAL SI6N means a sign erected on public or private , property which bears the address and/or name of a business, institution, church, or other use or activity, p7us directional . arrow of information on location. 15. DISTRICT refers to a specific zoning district as defined in the Fridley Zoning Ordinance. ]6. FLASHING SIGN means an illuminated sign which contains intermittent lights or exhibits noticeable changes in color or light intensity. 17. FREE STANDING SIGN means a sign which is securely attached ta the ground and not affixed to any part of any other structure. 18. GOUERNMENTAL SIGN means a sign which is srected by a govern- mental unit for the pupose of directing or guiding traffic or other public information. 19. IDENTIFICATION SIGN means a sign which states the name or address or both of the occupant or occupants of the lot or building where the sign is placed. 20. ILLUMINATED SIGN means a sign which is illuminated by an artificial light source. 2]. INFORMATION SIGN means a sign giving information to employees, visitors, or delivery vehicles, but containing no advertising or identification, ' 22. INSTITUTIONAL SIGNS means a sign or bulletin board which identifies the name and other characteristics of a public or private 'institution on site where the sign is located. � 3A DEFINITIONS ' � � ' ' � , ' Ordanance No, ----_-__ 23, MOTION SI6N means a sign which revolves, rotates, has moving parts, or gives the illusion of motion. 24. NON-CONFORMING SIGP� means a sign which lawfully existed p�ior to the adoption of this ordinance, but does not conform to the newly enacted requirements of this ordinance. 25. PERMANENT SIGN means a sign rihich is intended to be used for an indefinite period of time. 26, PORTABLE SIGN means a sign so designed as to be movable from one location to another and orhich is not permanently . attached to the ground, sales display device, or structure. 27. PORTA-pqNEL means a 10 foat by 20 foot, bac.k to back, mobile advertising device, mounted on wheels and used for commercial as well as civic promotions. 28. PROJECTING SIGN means a sign, other than a wall sign, which fs attached to any projectsfrom a building structyre. 29. READER BOARD denotes a changeable copy sign, 30. ROOF SIGN means a sign which is erected, constructed, or attached wholly or in part, above the roof of a building, except where the roof is an extended facade. 31. RUMMAGE/6ARA6E SALE SIGN means a temporary sign which ' advertises or directs the public to an infrequent sale of generally used merchandise sold from a private;residence. ' � ' ' 32. SIGN means a lettered board, or other display, and its support structure, used to advertise, direct, identify, inform, or convey a message to one who views it. 33. SIGN AREA means the total area of the sign, includin.-g the border and the surface which bears the advertisement, or in the case of inessages, figures, or sybols attached, directed to any part of the bui7ding, that area Hrhich is included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the message, figure, or symbol dispiayed thereon, The stipuiated maxim sign area for a free standing sign refers to a single facingo 34. SIGN STRUCTURE means any structure which supports, or is capable of,supporting, any sign. Said definition shall not include a building to which the sign is attacheda 35. SHOPPING CENTER/PIULTIPLE USE BUILDI�dG means a building planned and developed for multipte occupancy use as commercial or industrial enterprise. � DEFINITIONS 36. 7EMPORARY.SIGN means any sign, banner, pennant, valance, or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, or cardboard wallboard, or other light materiais with or without frames; intended to be disp)ayed for a limited period of time only. 37• WALL SIGN means a sign which is affixed to the wall of any building. � Ordinance No � , 3C 38. WALL GRAPHICS means a graphic design or decorative mural DEFINITTONS not intended for identification or advertising purposes, which is painted directly on an exterior wa)1 surface. 39. WINDO'r! SIGN means a sign installed inside a window for the purposes of viewing from outside the premises. This term does not include merchandise located in a window. 40. UNLAWFUL SIGN means a sign which is in conflict with this ordinance or which the administrator may declare as unlawful if it becomes dangerous to the public safety by reason of dilapidation or abandonment of a sign for which a permit required under a previous ordinance was not obtained. SECTION 214.03 GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL PROVISIOPJ The following provisions 214.031 - 214.043 shall apply in � all Districts. BITED , TN ALL DI 1. Permanent signs other than Governmental signs erected or temporarily placed within any street right-of-way or upon any public easement. 2. Signs or wall graphics that contain words or pictures of obscene, pornographic or immoral character, or that contain untruthful advertising. 3. Signs painted directly on buildings. 4. Portable signs {except for those provided for under "Uses Permitted in All Zoning). 5. Signs which resemble an official traffic sign or signal or bears the words "stop, go, slow" or similar words used for traffic control ( exceptfor directional signs on private property). 6. Signs which by reason of size, location, movement, content, coloring, or manner of illumination, may be confused with a traffic control sign, signal, or device, or the light of an emergency or road equipment vehicle, or which hide from view any traffic, street sign, signal or device. 7. Projecting signs. 8. Motion signs. SIGNS PROHIBI7ED IN ALL DISTRICTS 9. Illuminated signwhich changes in either coTor or in intensity of light or is animated, or has flashing or intermittent ligFits. 10. Advertising signs (except window signs, allowed only in C-1, C-2, CR1, CR2, C1S and C2S Zoning District, or franchise trademarks pertinent to the business or signs allowed under Section 215.05 of this ordinance.) � ' Ordinance No. 3 D -----�—_. � � ' il. Signs located within corner setback requirements, Section 205.154 (3), 12. Roof signs. ]3. R�volving beacons, zip flashers, and similar devices, �incTUding any sources of light which change in intensity. i�:--Por.t.:-F'ane�s .� .. SECTION 214.D31 SI6NS ALLOIaED WITH SPECIAL USE PERMITS ' l. Manual and/ or automatic changeable sig�s would be allowed in all districts, except R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4 Districts, and then only with the issuance of a special ' use permit, subject to the conditions of the specific Zoning District requirments (Section 214.05 of this ordinance). SECTION 214.032 SIGNS PERMITTED IN ALL DISTRICTS �. Address Signs: Each dwelling, business, or building , must have a minimum of one address sign, minimun of 3 1/2" high, maximum of 18" high, illuminated or reflective, . attached to the dwelling and visible from public right- � of-way. If the attached address sign cannot be visible from the public right-of-way, the address must be either . on the curb or on the mailbox. � ' ll ' 2. Bench Signs; To be permitted only at bus stops; cannot be any larger than, or extend beyond, any portion of the bench. 3. United States Flag: Follow Title 36, Section 173-378 of the United States Code, State Flag, Corporate F1ag. 4. Oirectional Signs (Public & Private) (a) Maximum four (4) square feet per facing; (b) Minimum ten (10) feet from street right-of-way; (c) Except that a sign directing the public to a hospital may be a maximum of twenty-four (24) square feet in area. 5. Institutional Signs: (a) Maximum twenty- four (24) square feet; (b) �4inimum ten (10) feet from street right-of-way; (c) Except a hospitale��iergenc sign which is located on the premises may be one nunc�red {100) square feet in area, SIGNS ALLOWED l•(ITH SPECIAL USE PERMITS SF6N5 PERMITTED IN ALL DdSTftICTS ADDRESS SIGNS BENCN SIGNS UNITED STATES FLAG DIRECTIONAL SIGNS INSTITUTIONAL SIGNS � Ordinance No. I � ! � � , � � � 6. Area Identification Signs: (see individual district regulations). 7. Standard Safety Identification Signage as used by public utilities, highway departments, etc. 8. Temporary Signs: (A) Construction 3E TEMPORARY SIGNS (1} Developments: Temporary construction signs may may be erected for the purpose of promoting a project of ten (10) or more residential dwelling units, ten (10) or more mobile homes, three (3) or more multiple dwellings, or a business. ' NEW ia) Sign shall not exceed fift CONSTRUCTION y (50) square feet in area; (b}. One (1) sign per street frontage; (c) Sign shall be removed when project is completed; , (d) Sign shall not be located closer than 100 hundred (100) feet to an existing building structure outside of the development. u � � (2) Individual Lots or Buildings: (a) Sign shall not exceed (6) square feet in area; (b} One (1) sign per street frontage; (c) Sign will be removed upon completion. , (B) Rea1 Estate Signs � O) Developments: Temporary real estate signs may be erected for the purpose of selling or promoting a project of ten (10) or more residential dwelling units, ' ten (10) or more mobile homes, three (3} or more multiple dwelTings, or a businesso J ' (a) Sign shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet in area; (b) One (1) sign per street frontage; (c) Sign shall be removed Nihen project is ninety- five (95) percent completed, sold or leased; REAL ESTATE SIGNS (d) Sign sha17 not be located closer than one hundred (100) feet to an existing building structure outside of the development. (2) Individual Lots or Buildings: � Ordinance No, � (a) ■ � �b) ' ' C. Sign shall not exceed six (6� square feet in area; One (1) sign per street frontage; (c) Extra "open house" signs to tae allowed only during day of open house; (d) Sign will be removed within five (5} days following sale or lease. Political Signs: (1) Maximum size shall not exceed 32 square feet; (2} Signs shall not be erected before closing of filing date; (3) Signs shall be removed within five (5) days following the election; � (�4) A fifteen ($15.00} deposit wi11 be deposited with the City prior to the erection of signs and retained until the signs are removed. If signs are not removed, the deposit � will be used to defray the cost of removal. Any additional eost will he billed to tf�e party posting the original deposit. � (5) Any political sign larger than 3 square feet must be placed 3 feet from public right-of-way. D. 6arage or Rurmnage Sale Signs: (1) Maximum size three (3) square feet; (2) Must be removed within three (3) days following end of sale. (3) If not removed, removal costs wili be levied against the occupant at the address of the advertised sale. 3F POLITICAL. SIGM1 � GARAGE OR RUMMA6E SALE SI6NS E. Banners or Pennants commemorating a special event not connected BRNNERS & with a business (such as Fridley '44'er Days). Banners or pennants for businesses wi11 be allowed for grand openings of PENNANTS business on7y for a ten day maximum period. SECTION 214>04 DISTRICT REQUIRE�4ENTS In addition to those signs permitted in all districts, the � fol]owing signs are permitted in each specific district and shall be regulated as to size, location and character accord- ing to the requirements herein set forth: DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS ' ' � Ordinance No. SECTION 214.041 SIZES, SETBACKS AND OTHER RE UIREMENTS FOR R-1, R- (a) Area Identification Sign 1. One (1) sign per development. 2. Maximum size twenty-four (24) square feet. 3. Minimum ten (10) feet from public right-of-way. SECTION 214.042 SIZES, SETBACKS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR R-3 and (a) Area Identification Sign 1. One (1) sign per development 2. Maximum size twenty-four (24) square feet. 3. Minimum ten (10) feet from public right-of-way. (b) Vacancy Signs le Maximum three (3) square feet in area. 2• :'�inimum ten (10) feet from public right-of-way. SECTION 214.043 SIZES SETBACKS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR R-4 (a} Area Identification Sign 1. One (1) sign per development. 2. Maximum size twenty-four (24) square feet. 3. Minimum ten (10) feet from public right-of-way. 4.044 SIZES, SETBACKS AND OiHER REQUIREMENTS FOR C-1 {a) Area Identification Sign 1. One (1) sign per development (b) Free Standing Signs 1. One (1} per street frontage. 2. Maximum eighty (80) square feet per development. 3. Maximum height twenty-five (25) feet above lot grade. 4. Minimum height ten (10) feet from bottom of sign to firiished 9round level. 5. Minimum ten (10) feet from property line or drive�•:ay. _ _ _ 3G nd R-1, R-2, R-2A REQUIREMENTS , R-3 and R-3A REQUIREP4ENTS R-4 REQUIREMENTS C-1, C-2, CR-7, CR-2 REQUIREMENTS 1 ■ I , ' � � � � , � � r � Ordinance No, {c} W�ndow Signage 1. Forty (40) percent of window area, excluding merchandise. (d) Wall Signs 1. Wall sign area shall not exceed 1.5 times the square root of the wa11 area on which the sign is to be placed. (e) Gas Stations 1. Gas price�signs are allowed only as an integra7 part of the identification sign or pump is)ando :CTION 2]4.045 SIZES, SETBACKS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR C-1S and C-2 fa) Area Identification Sign 7, One (1) area identification sign allowed per development. (b} Free Standing Signs ]. One sign per street frontage. 2. Eighty (80) square feet per development 3. Maximum height twenty-five (25) feet above grade. 4. Minimum height ten (10) feet from bottom of sign to finished ground level. 5. Minimum ten (10) feet from any property'line or driveway. i�) Window Siqnage 1. Forty (40) percent of window area, excluding merchandise. id) Wall Signs 1. Wall sign area shall not exceed 1.5 times the square root of the wal] area on which the sign is to be placed. �� R�uuirctmtN�s FOR M-1, M_p (a) Free Standing Sign 1. One (1) free standing sign per building of multiple use buildingo 2. Maximum eighty (80) square feet per development. 3. t9aximum height twenty-five (25) feet from grade. 4. Minimum height ten (10) feet from bottom of sign to finished ground Tevel. 3u C-1S and C-2S I REQUIREMENTS M-1 and M-2 REQUIREh1ENTS � � � Ordinance No, �b) Wall Sign 1. Maximum two (2) wall signs per business allowed on different walls. 2. Wall sign area shall not exceed 1.5 times the square root of the wall area on which the sign is to be placed. SECTION 214.047 P AND PD DISTRICTS Sign requirements in P and PD areas would be controlled by the City Council when the development is planned. SECTION 214.048 SHOPPIN6 CENTER/MULTIPLE USE BUIL�INGS (a) Within sixty days (60) of the adoption of this code, all owners of shopping centers and multipie use buildings of three or more businesses, must submit a comprehensive sign plan for their center or building to the Zoning Administrator for approval. � multiple useU6uiPdingtareashshalleconfopmntoCtheecondations of the sign plan and may be subject to conditions other than those in the district regulations in order to promote a un9form combination of sign. SECTION 214.05 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Permits (a) Before a sign may be displayed in the City of Fridley, the owner or lessee of the premises on which the sign is located shali file application with the City Zoning Administrator for permission to display such sign. Permits are required for all existing, new, relocated, modified or redesigned signs except those specifically exempt under Section 214,07 - 214.071 inclusivea � (b) The issuance of a permit may also be subject to additiona7 conditions in order to promote a more reasonable combination of signs and to promote conformity with the character and uses of adjoining property. The conditions will be subject to the discretion of the Zoning Administrator, (c) Temporary signs erected by a non-profit organization are not exempt from obtaining a permit for signs, but the City does waive the fee requirement. (d) No permit is required under this Section for the following signs: 1. A window sign. 2. Signs erected by a g�vernmental unit or public school district. 3I P AND PD DISTRICTS SHOAPING CENTE AND MULTIPLE U BUILDINGS GENEr2Al REQUIREMENTS PERMITS ' Ordinance No, , owner of the property which the sign is located, from conforming with the other provisions of this chapter. 6. Maintenance , . .� � 7 (a} Every sign shall be maintained in a safe, presentable good structural material condition at a�l times, (b) It shall be deemed a violation of this chapter when a sign becomes twenty-five (25) percent in need of repair. (c) The Zoning Administrator or agents shall be respons-• ible for the enforcement of this chapter. Existing Signs (a) Signs Eligible for "Legal Non-Conforming° Status � 1. Any sign located within the City limits on the _ date of adoption of this ordinance which does not conform with the provisions of this ordinance, is � eligible as a"legal non-conforming".sign and is permitted, provided it also meets the fol}owing requirements: . A. The sign was covered by a sign permit on the date of the adoption of this ordinance if one was required under applicable law, or B. If no sign permit was required under applicable law for the sign in question, the sign was in all respects in compliance with applicable law on the date of the adoption of this ordinance. (b) Loss of Legal Non-Conforming Status 1. A legal non-conforming sign shall immediately lose its legal non-conforming designation, if: 3J MAINTENANCE EXISTING SIGNS Ao The sign is altered in any way in structure or copy (except for changeable copy and normal maintenance) which tends to or makes the sign less in comp7iance with the requirements of this ordinance than it was before the alterations; or B. The sign is relocated to a position making it less in compliance with the requirements of this ordinance; or C. The sign is replaced; or D. When there is a change in otaner, tenant, or lessee, the legal non-conforming sign will become �llegal and said sign must 6e brought into compliance with the ardinance. E. When signage becomes fifty (50} percent dilapidated � Ordinance No. , J , � . � , ' � � r or fifty (50) percent in compliance, the remainder of the signage is to be brought into compliance also. (c) Abandoned Signs (a) Except as other�vise provided in this ordinance, any sign which identifies a business that has stopped operation for a period of three months or more, or any sign which pertains to a time, event, or purpose whiich no longer applies, shall be deemed to have been abandoned. Permanent signs appticable to a business temporarily suspended because of a change of ownership, or management or such a business, shall not be deemed abandoned unless the property remains vacant for a period of three months or more. An abandoned sign is prohibited and shall be removed by the owner of the sign ar the owner of the premises. SECTION 215.06 ENFORCEMENT 1. Uioiations of Code (a) Any sign that does not comply �,�ith the provisions of this ordinance. (b) A sign that is a hazard to the safety and welfare of the public (such as exposed wires, broken g3ass, weak support structure, broken pieces of inetal, etc.) 2. Notification of Violation of Code jthat anytsign�regulatednbytthisrchApternis�unsafe,finsecure, or is a menace to ihe public; or has been constructgd or � erected witnout a permit first being granted to the owner of the property upon which said sign has been erected, or is in violation of any other provision of this chapter, he ' shall give written notice of such violation to the owner or permit holder thereof. If the owner fails to remove or alter the sign so as to comply with the provisions set forth in this chapter within ten (10} calendar days following � receipt of said notice, such signs may be removed by the City.. The cost of this removal, including City expenses, shall be as a special assessment against the property upon r which the sign is located. (b) The Zoning Administrator or his agent may cause any sign or other advertising structure tvhich is a public hazard to be removed summarily� and without notice. (c} When the City sends the notice of violation, they will send a copy to both the permit holder and the landowner, if they are difFerent. _3, Penalty for Violation of Code 3 r< ENFORCEP�ENT I] ' I , Ordinance No (a) Any violation of this chapter is a misdeMeanor and is subject to all penalties provided for such violations under the provisions of Chapter 901 of the Frid1ey City Gode, Each day the violation continues in existence shall be deemed a separate violation. All signs are subject to such penalty for violation of the requirements of the district within which they are located, even though they may not be required by this chapter to pay a fee or acquire a permit. 4. Appeals (a) To provide for a reasonable interpretation of this cha�ter, a permit applicant who wishes to appeal an interpretation by the Zoning Administrator or agents, may file a notice of appeals with the City, and request a hearing before the F.ppeals Comnission. The Commission shall hear the appeal and make their recommendation to the City Council who has final action. SECTION 214.06 REPEAL Old Chapter 214 Signs and Billboards is hereby repealed, PASSE� AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIOLEY THIS DAY O.F 1977. MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE ATTEST: , CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL � First .Reading_ Second Reading: Publish: REPEAL 3L , , CALL TO ORDER: CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING , Chairperson Harris Meeting to order at , ' � , , JULY 27, 1977 called the July 27, 1977, Planning Commission 7:41 P•M- ROLI CALL Members Present: Storla, Harris, Peterson, Gabel, Langenfeld Member Absent: Bergman {pquist} Others Present: Ruben Acosta — Planning Aide APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES= July 13, 1977 MOTION by Mr• Langenfeld, seconded by Ms• Gabel, that the minutes of the July 13, 1977, Planning Commission meeting be approved as written� Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTE3: JULY 7, 1977 , MOTION by Mr• Storla, Commission receive the duly 7, 1977• seconded by Ms• Gabel, that the Planning Human,Resources Commission minutes of Mr• Langenfeld pointed out that, indeed, the discrimination problem would have to be watched at the Commissions• � Mr- Langenfeld expressed surprise at the resignation of Mr• William Scott• He felt that Mr• Scott did a good job for the Commission• ' ' ' � ' , I� Mr• Storla commented that in Mr• Scott�s letter he stated that he had an increase in family obligations that he felt so important that he would have to give up some of his time at the Commissions and the Human Resources Commission was one of the one he was giving up• Chairperson Harris wanted to know where the Human Resources Commission was going on the discrimination complaint• Mr• Storla said that they had a task force look into the complaint and the Commission would take their recommendation- He said that because of the complexity and importance of the complaint there would be a motion to recommend that Ms• Marty Will get legal advise in this case• He said that the Commission didn't really have the staff to do this type of investigation• 4 � tJ EJ , ' ' , , � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 � Paqe 2 Ms� Gabel felt that the HUman Resources Commission was in no position to make any type of recommendation of that nature• Mr• Storla said that �he Commission had been asked to take a position on the problem• He didn't feel that there was enough known to make any recommendation• Mr• Langenfeld thought that Ms• Will wanted this complaint to be heard so that the facts would be available nn record for a future time• Mr• Storla said that they would be deciding on what they planned to do regarding the Commission's stand but that no more discussion would be done on this at this level• Mr� Langenfeld felt that the members of the Commission could take some stand just from their own background and knowledge• He felt they could at least commit themselves to the fact that discrimination sfiva�Yi--rrot�woa3�d--not exist• (did/did noE) Mr• Langenfeld felt that the State would be getting into this complaint before long• Mr• Storla commented the City Human Rights the State• that the complaint had to go before Department before it could go before Chairperson Harris said that the Planning Commission would make no motion on the item because it was decided that the me�mbers of the Commission would need more informatinn• , UP4N A VOICE VOTE� all voting aye, the motion carried unanimousiy• The minutes of the July 7, 1977, Human Resources Commission meeting were received at 7:50 P.M- ' RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JULY 19, 1977 MOTION by Ms• Gabel, ' Planning Commission July 19, 1977• seconded by Mr� Langenfeld, that the receive the Appeals Commission minutes of � Ms• Gabel explained that the Commission had discussed the conflict of interest memo• 3he said that the Appeals Commission concurred with the memo as it effected them• � Mr• Langenfeld asked what had occurred regarding the request for tfie variance of the Interim Development Regulations for the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area by Mr• Richard H• Netz• ' I 1 1 4A ' � � ' ' I� �I , LJ , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Pa e� 4 B Ms• Gabel responded that there had been some problem with that item• She explained that there was a time that Mr• Netz could have built a house on that property without making a variance request• She went on to say that the person who had received a variance in January to build a house across from the lot in question had experienced several problems• {Ms• Gabel commented that she didn't think that the lot had been banked properly•} Ms• Gabel went on to say that she had talked to Dick Sobiech and � he expressed the feelings that because of the manner in which Mr� Netz planned to landscape the lot that there should be no real major problem• thanGifeitfwouldhbe landscaped/terraceddasmMre. Netzeproposed ta do• Ms• Gabel explained that there were �roblems and the Appeals Commission could not agree on the item, so they decided to forward it on to City Council with no.recommendation• Ms• Gabel reflected on the fact that when people do build along t.he river bluffs, they were putting a lot of money into the property and since, obviously� they would want to protect their houses and pro�erty, they wouldn't build without knowing all the problems that couid be encountered• Mr• tangenfeld believed that Mr• Netz was fully aware of the problems he was going to encounter3 («nd ery to the City far assistancs later on.) Ms• Gabel said ' the City would he would have• it had been made very clear to Mr• Netz that not be liable in any way for any problems that � UPON A VOICE VOTE� all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• The minutes of the July 19, 1977, Appeals Commission meeting were received at 7:56 P•M- � � , u ' , y•9 CONTINUED� PROPOSED CHANGES IN SIGN ORDINANCE Bob Schroer – representing Chamber of Commerce and Duane Prairie – member of the Sign Ordinance Project Committee were present to discuss this item• Chairperson Harris went through the sign ordinance starting with Section 214•�31 Signs Prohibited in all Districts• He explained that the definitions were basically good as written and they should be used as needed in discussing the items• Mr- Prairie asked how much of the original Sign Ordinance had been changed• Ms• Gabel commented that much of it appeared to remain the same� Mr•-Peterson commented that some of the changes that had been made definitely needed more work regarding the wording• , ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Page 4 214•03 General Provisions for all Districts 214•031 Signs Prohibited in all Districts ' 1• permanent signs other than Governmental signs erected or temporarily placed within any street right–of–way or upon any public easement• � i^ J � ' t� u ❑ � ' LJ � , ' ' u ' Mr• Schroer asked if the word ^street^ applied to the City's highways also- Chairperson Harris said yes, all pu6lic land• Mr• Schroer asked how a permanent sign could be temporarily placed• Ms• Gabel indicated that there existed permanent signs that were on wheels• She said that they were basically ^portapanels^• 2• Signs or wall 9raphics that contain words or pictures or obscene, pornographic or immoral character, or that contain untruthful advertising• 3 4 No Comments• Signs painted directly on buildings• Mr• Schroer said that someone should be a61e to obtain a variance from this• He explained that sometimes ^decor^ dictated a certain era that didn`t yet have sign letters• He felt that that type of thing should be considered a reasonable request for a variance• Ms• Gabel explained that this item was currently part of the Ordinance and the Sign Committee had decided to keep the item• Portable signs {except for those provided for under ^Uses Permitted in all Zoning•^} Chairperson Harris indicated that this item was covered later in the Ordinance• 5• Signs which resembles an official traffic sign or signal or bears the words ^stop, go, slow^ or similar words used for traffic control {except for directional signs on private property• No Comments• � � � ' C! lJ � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Page 5 6• Signs which by reason of size, locatio�, movement, content, coloring, oc manner of illumination may be confused with a t'raffic control sign, signal or device, or the light of an emerqency or road equipment vehicle, or which hide from view any traffic, street sign, signal or device• No Cflmments• 7• Projecting Si9ns Ms• Gabel said that the biggest change on this item was the definition: 27• Projecting Sign: A sign, other than a wall sign, which is attached to and projects from a building structure• ' Mr• Acosta explained that Staff had tried to make the definitions as brief as possible• Their intent was to make the Sign Ordinance consistent with the existing Ordinance• ' , Mr• Schroer asked if this item was presently in the Zoning Code� Mr• Acosta said it was presently in the Sign Code- ' Ms� Gabel explained that generally a projecting sign projects from the building, can be seen from both sides, and usually swings• � ' ' , C' l.J L' � ' B� Motion Signs 22• MOTION SIGN: A sign which revolves, rotates, has any moving parts, or gives the illusion of motion• No Comments• 4D ' � � � � ' � PLANNING COMMISSION MEfTING — J�LY 27, 1977 Page 6 9• Illuminated sian which changes in either color or in intensity of light or is animated, or has flashing or intermittent lights {including traveling electronic message centers or Electronic message centers which ' change more than once every 15 minutes except one giving time, temperature, or other public information• Discussion took place regarding the difference in illuminated signs and flashing signs• Mr• pcosta felt that the definition of illuminated signs would cover flashing signs- Ms• Gabel said that if the City was prohibiting flashing signs, then she felt that it was necessary to have a definition of flashing signs• Chairperson Harris said that the definition for a Flashing 3ign would be inserted as x39 on Page 5• Mr• Schroer disagreed 1�Oi with this item• He couldn't understand why there was an objection to this item• He wanted to know why this sign was being opposed• � Ms• Gabel explained that with a major freemay and three other major highways running through the city that Fridley could become a City of traveling signs � She agreed that many were attractively done but she didn't like to think of what could happen if this item was left open–door policy• � Mr• Schroer felt that would take care of the was anticipating• ' � ' ' � ' 1 the present City restrictions problems that Ms• Gabel Ms• Gabel felt that the present restrictions would possibly take care of the Freeway but she was mainly concerned about Central Avanue, �niversity Avenue, and East River Road• Mr• Schroer indicated that basically the signs are being allowed except they can only change every 15 minutes• He wanted to know what the difference was if it changed constantly or every 15 minutes, the sign was still present• Ms• Gabel felt that the signs were traffic hazards• Mr• Schroer asked why public information could be allowed but commercial enterprises were not being allowed to advertise this way• 4E � , � � lJ :a.,:: ; � PLANN�NG COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Page 7 Chairperson Harris said that all ^Illuminated Signs^ should 6e allowed by Special Use Permit only• He felt that even signs that gave pu6lic information could be a safety hazard if placed in the wrong place• Mr• Peterson said that there were reasons for businesses to want to using an electronic message center the City should encourage business in Fridley rather than discourage different avenues of advertising• legimate advertise 6y He felt that- enterprises it by for6idding 4F Mr. Harris suggested p�f//q��/1//$�� that that type of sign would indicate a special nePtl a d Spe�},a�l Use Permit would be allowed • $'I��a��lb �hat/ C"3`Ey needed some control ona��i��e��r e� � tP`o�f-�nw� �s�iTt,l��i� would be as that control��a��p��vr� ��wjqy+� j�ji�'� comfortable �/l/41�d,1y�/�p�ry9'/�/��A�,�/��'$/,�,W/�A��//r/h��/ /f�19,pA'/�i/��l�f.with it providing that criteria established for a Special Use Permit took traffic patterns into consideration. Mr• Schroer felt that the City had control already on where a sign can be placed, etc• He felt that that should be ample control� He did indicate that he appreciated the position that the Commission was taking• � Mr• Prairie indicated Project Committee had they didn't think it in Fridley• � � that the reason the Sign gone that way was because would effect too many people Ms• Gabel pointed out that that mode of advertising was extremely expensive; therefore, it wouldn't effect too many people in Fridley• She said that Ralph Carpenter from kmerican Sign had showed some slides to the Project Committee that pictured some of the new techniques that could be done with the electronic message centers• She said that, indeed, it was most impressive� � Tome discussion took place regarding how much could be shown on a flashing message center to have the message be effective• � � � .� MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr• Langerifeld, that t9 be reworded to read ^Iiluminated sign which changes in either color or in intensity of light or is animated, or has flashing or intermittent lights {including traveling electronic message centers or electronic message centers which change more than once every 15 minutes ��Cf�e��p��jj�j�njge �P��PII�TWP-�r��,�R'i/P�llq�n�]'/��A'��//�1' �1"�Y�u�P,� e a owe only in G and M Districts {and not in any R Districts} by Special Use Permit ONLY^• r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Paqe 8 � � Mr. Langenfeld � stated that.� [__1 � � � � Mr• Langenfeld pointed out that by using a Special Use Permit the advantages are that the control would be put into the hands of the City• quoted January 11, 1977 Appeals Comnission Meeting minutes which Ms• Gabel said that she had learned something interesting• She said that different sign companies say different things to different people• When a petitioner �ent before the Appeals Commission, they said that even though the ordinance allowed only a certain size sign, the sign company said that they didn't carry that size, so the petitioner would have to get a variance to have a different size sign, when in reality Sign Companies can make—up any type and size sign• Mr• Peterson commented that he wasn't concerned whether major companies would be able to have their signs all over Fridley• He said his major concern was that the businesses of the citizens of Fridley won't be abie to get their message across to their customers and they would be the ones most hurt• Mr• Schroer felt that that type of sign was the up—and—coming sign in Fridley• UPON A VOICE V4TE� all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• No• 9 would be amended to read, ^Illuminated sign which changes in either color or in intensity of light or is animated, or has flashing or intermittent lights {including � traveling electronic message centers or electronic message centers which change more than once e�ery 15 minutes except one giving time, � temperature, or other public information} be allowed only in C and M Districts {not in any R Districts} by Special Use Permit ONLY"• � I � 1�• Advertising Signs {except window signs allowed only in C1, C2, CR1, CR2, CS1� and CT2 Zoning Districts or Franchised trademarks pertinent to the Business}• {Mr• Acosta had read this item because of a change that had occurred in the wording} Mr• Peterson pointed out to Mr• Schroer that the reason for this change was because of the discussion that had occurred at the last meeting• He said that the Planning Commission felt that many times that Franchised trademarks were very pertinent to the success of that persorr's business• � �f G � � � � L�9 � I � � � :� PLANNING COMMI3STON MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 pa e 9 Mr• Prairie felt that this would result in people putting up cheaper and less attractive signs• Mr• Acosta indicated that the intent is to get more consistency in the signs in Fridley to give a more aesthetically pleasing appearance• Mr• Langenfeld said that the cost factor would have to be considered when it came to th�9��5�g� being conveyed• He felt that the trigges percen4age of the sign should be the establishment and not t.he product• Mr• Peterson said he wouldn't be totally comfortable tel2ing Fridley businesses not to go into coop— advertising with a vendor• Chairperson Harris indicated that perhaps it should be stated that a certain percentage of the sign had to be the identifying name• Ms• Gabel said that the intent of the sign(Committee) should be to identify an establishnent and not to advertise a product• Mr• Prairie said that the cost of the sign had to be considered• He said ihat a local businessman would probably have only X number of dollars for advertising purposes• The big vendor companies have many more dollars for advertising purposes• He said that most times the big vendor companies are willing to give a local businessman an identification sign that had a certain product advertised on the same sign• He felt, that by having the opportunity to obtain a sign in that manner, generally the local business would end up with a nice, expensive type sign• He felt that if these signs would be forbidden, then the local businessman would have to settle for a cheaper, less appealing identiiication sign because that would be all they could afford• Mr• Acosta felt that even though the expense was an important part it should not overpower the intent of the City• He said that the ^line^ had to be drawn someplace• �{ f{ � � � � � lJ I � � � � � r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 197? Pa e 10 Mr• Langenfeld asked Mr� Schroer how effective/ necessary a sign was once a person's good will had been estab]ished• Mr� Schroer felt that it was probably more necessary/effective since a person would have to keep up that good will by reminding the customers that certain products are available• Mr• Storla left the Planning Commission meeting at 9:08 P.M- due to a previous commitment• Mr• Langenfeld stated that he felt advertising was an essential part of a business• Mr• Schroer didn't believe an Ordinance was necessary• He felt that a good understanding amongst City personnel would result in some system that would enable compatibility in a decision• He felt that as long as there would exist a way to appeal a City's decision, that would be all that would be necesasry• Ms• Gabel wanted to know if there would be a workable solution to the differences of opinions regarding this sign� Mr• Acosta pointed out that no matter which direction City went or what they did, someone would get hurt• Most Ordinances/restrictions will not let someone do something that some person wants to do• Mr• Peterson said he would strongly object to any regulation that would have no appeal system 6uilt into it• He did not believe any administration existed to be served• He said that Staff was there to serve the public• He was upset because there was continual reference to ^Staff wanted this, and Staff wanted that^• He said that Staff should be providing information• He said Staff should be carrying out directions, but that the citizens that lived in Fridley and paid taxes in Fridley should be making the decisions and if the City would write any Ordinance that would allow no appeal procedure, he would become very upset• Mr• peterson went on to say that when Staff refuses a request by a citizen, that Staff should also explain to that citizen the appeals procedure and layout the steps that could be taken . He pointed out that many times the citizen can�t affprd the fees involved with an Appeal, so they have to take whatever City Nall says, even if that person felt very strongly the opposite way• 4I , PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING — JULY 27, 19?7 Page 11 � Mr• Langenfeld stated that he would feel very badly as a member of the Planning Commission, if a major business or industry from Fridley left the City . because of a difference of opinion regarding a certain � sign or avenue of advertising and then relocatad in another city that would allow the sign or mode of advertising that they had wanted• � � � � � � , Ms• Ga6e1 said that the Sign Committee had not diseussed that aspect of the item• Chairperson Harris pointed out that a variance procedure was part of the Ordinance and he felt that each problem would be hafldled on an individual basis• Mr• Prairie pointed out that sometimes the cost involved with getting a��(q�tpj./�,�g!/pj�qq�}�t would be more than the sign itself� (variance) Ms• Gabel said that economics was a big factor• Mr• Peterson said that item 10 should be continued to enable Ms• Gabel to do some additional work to better explain exactly what the considerations would be to justify a/��d¢�t/i/a�Y/y��/��,r��+jc to allow for this type of sign• 4Var5hh , Ms• Gabel indicated that the existing signs would be ^grandfathered^ in and as long as the sign was maintained and didn't become over SOi delapita�ed, a y'��i/�y/�1�'/p�tj(�/Y�'�74PF�ot be required.• She said that it would mainly effect a new business and a new sign� Chairperson Harris said that the advertising signs in Item 10 would also include billboards• Mr• Schroer said he didn't think bi116oard advertising was as big an issue as the signs previously discussed• Chairperson Harris asked how much of the local businesses advertised with billboards• � Mr• Schroer said that indirectly they benefited from billboard advertising if they carried the product that was being advertised• ,� i � 1 Mr• Schroer said that the Chamber of Commerce was not quite as concerned about billboard advertising as they were about local advertising signs• t� � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Pa e 12 � � � • � � � � � i 11. 12� 13�- 14 � i, Signs located within corner setback requirements {Ordinance No• 205•154{3} No comments• Roof Signs 28• ROOF SIGN: A sign which is erected, constructed, or attached wholly upon the roof of a building� There was discussion regarding the definition of roof� Some buildings have two roofs and the question arose as to which roofline was considered the roof of the building• Mr• Acosta was going to help explain the definition of Roof Signs in cleaner, more concise wording• Revolving beacons, zip flashers, and similar devices, including any sources of light which changein intensity• No comments• Porta-panels Mr• Prairie said that these signs are the most unappealing signs that exist� Mr• Schroer aj.so could be totally least objections• felt that this is one sign that removed and there would be the Ms• Gabel felt that forbidding these signs would � effect/hurt the least number of people• She said that these signs appeared to be the most offensive sign in existence• `� [ �� 15• Readerboards {except those signs dispensing public information} by Special Use Permit only• Ms• Gabel explained that what the Sign Committee was trying to eliminate was the ^junky^ blue signs that were sold to businesses throughout Fridley by some ^fly-by-night^ sign business• Chairperson Harris wanted the parenthesis scratched on the description• Mr• Acosta indicated that if the Commission would grant one business a Special Use Permit for a readerboard, they would have to be consistent and allow a like-business to also have a readerboard• � J � � � � � i � i PLANtJItJG COMMISSIOtJ MEETIpG — JULY 27, 1977 Parye 13 4L Chairperson Harris said th;at City would have to set up guidelines or standards or some type of polify and if a petitioner met those quidelines, then they could obtain the Special Use permit• Mr• Peterson asked what the #ee for a Special Use Permit was• • Mr• Acosta said it was �120• . • Mr� Schroer said that if a business felt a need for a readerboard, then he should be allowed to have one• . � � Ms• Gabel felt that the�c��ini�ion of a readerboard should be that a readerboard could be a free- standing sign, but a readerboard could not be attached to a sign that was not�a readerboard- Ms• Gabel indicated that if an advertising sign ' eould be used for identifying purposes only, then ih reality, the traveling message centers would not be allowed at alls • Chairperson liarris pointed out that that problem was salved by requiring a Special Use Permit for all traveling/flashing message centers• � MOTION BY Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr• Langenfeld, to change item 15 to read, "Readerboards by Special Use Permit only^• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• � 2b�•032 Signs Permitted in all Districts , 1• Address Signs: Each dwelling, business, or building must have a minimum of one address sign, minimum of � 3-1/3^ high, maximum of Z8^ high, illuminated or reflective, attached to the dwelling and visible from public right-of-way• � Mr• Prairie wanted to know if residents would be forced to remove trees, etc• to enable the address sign to be visible from public�right-of-way. � i . � � Mr• Acosta said that the address should be visible, but the resident would prabably not be forced to �emove trees, etc• He said that the person would be encouraged to indicate the address on the house in addition to another piace that would be visible from the public right-of-way. � PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETINu — JULY 27, 1977 Page 14 4 t� � �� I � �1 � � � � 2• 3• 4• 5 Bench 3igns: To be permitted only at bus stops; cannot be any larger than or extend beyond any portion of the bench� N0 Comments• UT• FLAG following Title 36, section 173-178 of the U• T• Code, State Flag, Corporate Flag• Mr• Langenfeld corrected the abbreviation for United States• He said it should be U•S- Directional Signs: {public and private} {a} Maximum four {4} square feet per facing; {b} Minimum ten {yp} feet from street right-of-way; {c} Except that a sign directing the public to a hospital may be a maximum of twenty-four {24} square feet in area• No Comments Institutional Signs: {a} Maximum twenty-four {24} Square feet; {b} Minimum ten {1�} feet from street�right-of-way, except on corners- {c} Except a hospital emergency sign which is located on the premises may be fifty {50} square feet in area• (Mr. Gabel said that the Sigh Project Canmittee had wanted a 100 sq. ft. sign.) Ms• 6abe1 felt that the emergency sign in {c} should be much larger to be sure that people can see the sign• She felt that the sign should be large enough to see without having to look/search for it• MOTION by Ms• 6abe1, seconded by Mr• Peterson, to change the wording of {c} to read, "Except a hospital emergency sign which is located on the premises may be one hundred {100} square feet in area^• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• � Chairperson Harris read through the remaining items no comments/discussion untiL Item 8, C� 2• i I t There were , � lJ � r I � I � � � � i r � r I � , �J n Y 27, y977 age 15 8+ C+2• Signs shall not be erected more than 45 days prior to an e:ection• Ms• Gabel felt that the way this read, that if a , person erected a sign before the primary election and that person was successful, then the person would have to remove the signs after the primary and then put them back up for the General Election• MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Ms• Gabel, that item 2 be changed to read, ^Signs shall not 6e erected before the closing of filing for an election^• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• Chairperson Harris, again, continued reading the Ordinance• There was no comment/discussion until item 8, �, 5• 8�C,5• Any political sign larger than 3 sq• ft- must be placed 10 feet from pu6lic right—of—way. , MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr• Langenfeld, to change the wording to read, ^pny political sign larger than 3 sq• ft- must be placed 3 feet from public right—of-way^. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• Mr• Storla returned to the Planning Commission meeting at 10:45 p.M. Chairperson Harris, continued reading the Ordinance• There were no comments/discussion until item 214•045, {D}. 214-045, {D} Wall Signs: Wall Signs area shall not exceed 1•5 times the square root of the wall length on which the sign is to be placed• Mr• Hamernik {City Council — Ward 1} questioned the formula to determine the size of a wall sign• Mr• Prairie said that the wording was wrong• He felt that the wording should be checked because originally when the Sign �ommittee decided upon the formula, that the signs to be allowed would be very ample/adequate in size• Discussion then continued to item 27,4•p48 4 r� , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6 — JULY 27+ 1977 Page 16 40 � � 214•048 {a} Within sixty days {6�} of the adoption of this code, all owners of shop�ing centers and multiple use buildings must submit a comprehensive sign plan for their center or building to the Zoning administrator for approval• � Chairperson Harris felt that rather than the word ^multiple use building^, it should be more specific and say a building with three or more r � , � � � , � � � � � � � �I,I �� uses• Ms• Gabel explained that this was aimed mostly at new shopping centers/multiple use buildings or for the situation that the signs would become more than SOi delapitated — then that establishment would have to submit a comprehensive sign plan• Discussion took place regarding how to define a multiple use building• Discussion then continued to item 214•05 214•OS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3• Fees The annual permit fee and expiration date shall be as provided in Chap�er 11 of this Code• Mr• Acosta quoted a statement that Mr• Boardman had made regarding the fees• He said the feeling was that Gity was penalizing the person who does a good job with his signs, keeps them maintained properly, and who adheres to the regulations• Mr• Boardman felt that by charging an annual fee makes that person come up with the fee every year even when he is doing a proper job of maintaining the sign• It was felt that a one-time fee would be best and if a person does abuse the code by not maintaining his signs, then that person would be penalized and charged a fee in addition to having to fix/clean-up the sign in.violation• MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Ms• Gabel, to have the wording of item 3 changed to read ^There shall be a one-time permit fee^• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Page 17 4P 1 214•os 7• �ENERAL REQUIREMENTS Existing Signs ' Mr• Peterson commented that ^in compliance^ was referred to many times• He wanted to know what �that phrase meant� �Mrs. Gabel responded that generally the idea was if the sign was 50% dilapitated, i.t must meet the code; or, �n�y��pp,��rn-�q r,��iF,��i�r�r�,�l�vixlrr�i�a,��i�tv� if because the sign y�R'� ki"N��lxi9'l��lh�''��/�'97�fi1�l�dPfi/lr/��J�/l�/�Pfi�l�'�'/�/�1�7� �had been repaired and 1'ply��l�r,�y��t1�'��p1�1/Fpl'TI'q�FFi�J'g�lRrJ'/��i'l�,efS�'�A/ppN1'�f then brough 50% into compliance with the Chairperson Harris felt that this entire item- ,code, then the needed ^cleaning up^ • He requested /I�'$f/�d��/1�Ruben Acosta) total sign have to to work some more on this item• bring their total sign into complianc� , Chairperson Harris requeste that the words ^his^ be removed from the entire Ordinance• , � Discussion then went on to item 214•06 214-06 ENFORCEMENT Mr• Prairie wanted to know who would remove the abandoned Signs• , Ms• Ga6e1 said that the City would remove the signs and that the costs would be assessed against the property• She explained that because the City would send the notice of violation both to the permit ' holder and the landowner, sometimes the owner would put pressure on the permit holder to repair/replace the sign• � � II , � � ' , , MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr• Langenfeld to continue the Proposed Sign Ordinance until the next meeting so that Ms• Gabel would be able to do more work on different points that had been questioned• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the inotion carried unanimously• Mr• Schroer thanked the Planning Commission for, letting him take part in the meeting• Chairperson H.arris declared a short break at 11:24 P.M- Chairperson Harris called the meeting back to order at 11=34 P•M- MOTION 8Y Mr• Langenfeld, seconded by Ms• Gabel, to suspend the rules in order to handle the memo on the Code of Ethics• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• Mr• Ed Hamernik, City Council – Ward 1, was present• L' ' l� i � . � I ' , 1 ' � II � ' i ' ' , ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Pa9e ]�8 4 Q Mr• Namernik explained that the memo had been discussed at the City Council meeting and that he had several objections to what was being proposed• He wanted to present a minority recommendation on how this ordinance should be handled• He said that in principle he agreed to what was trying to be done• His primary objection was that the proposed was more cumbersome than necessary• He felt the subject could be handled ^cleaner^ and still provide the intent of what is desired• He felt that exposure by an individual at the time a specific item was being discussed would satisfactorily handle the situation� He felt that a written disclosure was not really providing any benefit• He didn't like the idea of having the type of information that was being discussed put in a file subject to public access• He also didn't see any benefit City would get from having that information in a file� He was interested in seeing a much reduced form of this ordinance based primarily on public disclosure at the time of discussion and do away with the filing and the need for rather strict enforcement• He felt that if a written disclosure was desired he strongly recommended it 6e limited only to elected officials or people who have a binding vote in e discussion• He felt that the City Charter did address this issue and he felt this only made it somewhat redundant• He felt that as far as Commission members other than the Appeals Commission this Ordinance would put an added burden on them• He said that there were perhaps some people that would resent havi�g to do this type thing and since they are volunteers, he was not in favor of subjecting them to this type of thing• He felt that some of the requirements in the Ordinance was bordering on invasion of privacy especially on the volunteer group• He felt that the esl.ected group of officials, when they decide to run for office, does open themselves up to a certain amount of public scrutiny• He really didn't believe that a volunteer should have to be subjected to this Ordinance• Chairperson Harris asked Mr• Hamernik what his thoughts were on the section on the City Attorney and Senior Administrative Staff• Mr• Hamernik felt that this was strictly an Administrative issue and should be left up to ,the City Manager• Mr• Peterson said that he objected to City Council delegating their authority through the City Manager• He felt that if the City Attorney and the Department Head should disclose, that that should be a Council decision, because they are the one that a citizen can talk to and they have to answer to the citizens at the polls and the citizens had no way of talking to the City Manager and he objected to the City Manager making that type of decision in terms of ethics in the City• � I� , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Page y9 Mr• Hamernik responded that the Charter had been recently changed where the City Attorney is now hired by the City Manager• He felt that since the City Manager is the Administrative Officer of the City and anything the people below him are asked to do or required to do, he felt that it should come as a directive from the City Manager• � Mr• Langenfeld said that he definitely felt that it was borderlining invasion of privacy• He objected to the fact that the information would be written and could be available to anyone and he felt that it wasn't anyone's business outside of the City`s files� He felt � that the penalty part was very severe• He indicated that if this Ordinance should pass as written, then he felt that the City Manager should also be a part of this disclosure• , Ms• Gabel indicated that the Appeals Commission had discussed this item• She said that the Commission had made a motion � that concurred with the Ordinance as it effected them• She said that she had talked to Mrs• Schnabel on this and she didn't express any problems with this item• II �_ � '. ' , , , ' L 1 � � Mr• Peterson said that he had not discussed this item at his last meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission and indicated that any comment he would make was entirely his own opinion and he was not speaking for the Commission• Mr• Storla commented that the Human Resources Commission had,not discussed this item yet• Chairperson Harris felt that more than anyone else on the Planning Commission, that he was effected the most• At that time, he made his public disclosure to be included in the minutes: ^Property in the City of Fridley in which Richard Harris has an interest• {y} 620� NE Riverview Terrace {Home} Lot 2, Block 3, Julianne Addition {2} Lots 5& 6, Block 3, East Ranch Estates, Second Addition {the same being 7701, 7703, 7765 Main Ttreet NE} {�} Lots 1 thru 11 and 26 thru 37, Block 8, Onaway Addition {the same being 13, 15, and 17 — 77th Way NE 7710, 7720, 7780 and 7790 Main Street NE} Principal in H& R Enterprises and also principal in the Dick Harris Company^• 4a ' � , �J � , Ll , , ' PLA�NNING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 27, 1977 Page 20 Mr• Hamernik felt that Chairperson Harris had handled this in an �� S appropriate manner that could effectively handle the entire situation• Mr- Peterson said that he had been approached by several citizens from Fridley regarding the item in discussion. He said that these citizens felt that this Ordiance would tend to limit or cause people not to volunteer to serve on a volunteer committee• Chairperson Harris spoke in defense of the Ordinance• He said that for too long Government has gotten a^black eye^• He said that if this was a way of rebuilding confidence in the City Government, then he was for it• Ms• 6abe1 agreed and said that if City could do anything to promote some iaith in government, then it had to be good• Chairperson Harris felt that if someone had something to ^hide^, then perhaps they shouldn't be serving• Mr• Hamernik felt that if people who had an interest in the city and who were business peo�le were wanted to serve on the various Committees, he didn*t want to see an Ordinance that would prevent these people from volunteering because they felt their privacy was being invaded• He still felt that the same effect would be gained by a verbal disclosure at the time of discussion• Chairperson Harris explained that the letter indicated that it was directed by City Council that any comments regarding this proposed Ordinance be directed to them• MOTION by Mr� Langenfeld, seconded by Mr• Peterson, that the ' planning Commission receive the Code of Ethics Ordinance• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• ' Mr- Peterson indicated that he believed in good government and he believed in credibility and he believed in not having a conflict of interest, but he found it difficult to see why you need to ' disclose the financial facts of your Company just because it happened to be located within the City of Fridley and you happened to be on the Planning Commission or any other Commission• He felt there would be chance for other people, who might be ' competitors, to use that information because once it was filed it would become public record• � ' Chairperson Harris indicated that generally for all the items listed, they are aiready in public record someplace• Discussion took place regarding exactly how much would have to be disclosed upon request and the people that would have to be disclosed• ' Some members felt that only the person on the Commission or the actual person involved should have to make written disclosure• They felt it shouldn't include any other relative or spouse• ' � � , , ' L' , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — J�LY 27, 1977 Page 21 Mr- Peterson said that he agreed in principle with what the Council was attempting to accomplish• Mr• Langenfeld said that the credibility of City Government was essential• He felt that disclosure of some of the requested � information could lead to unpleasant situations for an individual on the Commission• Mr• Peterson felt that this item couid be handled in one paragraph by merely stating that the member had no interest in a company that would benefit by doing business with the City or where they could influence policy, etc• , Mr• Peterson indicated that he didn't agree with having to disclose the interests of father/mother/sister/brother etc• He felt that that was overstepping certain boundaries� ' Chairperson Harris felt that there wasn`t even the right to look at the adult child's financial record• He wanted it to be limited to {at the maximum} the member and the spouse• ' � ' � ' ' , ' ' ' � Mr• Peterson said that according to all the things being tried to get equality for each person, he felt that the City was taking a step backwards• He said that just because he wanted to be on the Rlanning Commission, his wife, just because she was married to him, would have to disclose her interests• He felt that this would be an invasion of her privacy• Chairperson Harris pointed out that the way the laws are written in the State of Minnesota, all the properties are held in common• He said that if they are living together, they would have a common interest• Mr• Storla felt that it wouldn't include the spouse if they weren*t living together or were divorced• Mr• Wamernik indicated that he personally had nothing to hide and his statements were not some personal vendetta to try to prevent the ordinance from being implemented, but said that he really didn't want something put into an ordinance that would be difficult to maintain and that was not easily workable and he didn't think that in its present form, the ordinance would be• followed• Mr• Peterson said that he would like to comply with the City Manager's request• He said that he didn't like the time table• He said that he would like the Parks and Recreation Commission discuss this item also• 4T , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIPIG —�IULY 27, 1977 Page 22 �� ' ' � MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr•.Storla, that the Pianning Commission continue the discussion of the memo on the Code of Ethics• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• Mr• Peterson requested that Mr• Boardman insure that this item appears on the next agenda of the Parks and Recreation Comrnission meeting• '. 2• CONTINUED= PROPOSED MAINTENANCF CODE MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Ms• Gabel, that the Planning ' Commission continue the Proposed Maintenance Code• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• � 3• RECEIVE FOR INFOPMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY= LETTEft FftOM ZOLLIE BARATZ, Z& S MANAGEME.NT CO•, DATED JULY 15, 1977• � 1 ' 1 MOTION by Ms• Gabel, seconded by Mr• Langenfeld, that the Planning �ommission receive the letter from Zollie Baratz• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr• Langenfeld, seconded by Mr- Storla, to adjourn the July 27, 1977, Planning Commission Meeting• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• Chairperson Harris declared the meeting adjourned at 12:33 p.M- , Respectfully submitted, %�%a��2U�� , MaryLee Carhill Recording Secretary ' � ' ' ' � d ' CITY OF FRIDLEY 5 ' � ' '� � ' ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 3, 1977 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Harris called the August 3, 1977, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:40 P•M• ROLL CALL� Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Storla, Bergman, Harris, Peterson, Gabe1, Langenfeld None Jerrold Boardman, City Pianner APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JULY 27, 1977 Mr• Langenfeld indicated that on Page 2, fifth paragraph, second sentence, should read, ^He felt they could at least commit themselves to the fact that discrimination did/did not exist•^ , Mr• Langenfeld indicated that on Page 3, sixth paragraph, ^and cry to the City for assistance later on^ should be added to the existing sentence• ' Mr• Langenfeld i7dicated that on Page 9, third paragraph, second senten�e, shouid read, ^He felt that the greatest percentage of the sign should be the establishment and not the product^• ' � � , 1 i� � ' � Ms• Gabel asked that on Page 7, paragraph 3, the first sentence be changed from, ^Ms� Gabel said that that type of sign would indicate a special need and a Special Use Permit would be allowed to "Chairperson Harris suggested that that type of sign would indicate a special need and a Special Use Permit would be allowed Ms• Gabel said that she had not made that statement• � � Ms• Gabel corrected the third paragraph on Page 7, the second sentence• She said that it presently said, ^She said that City needed some control on these types of signs and as long as that control was present, she would be comfortable allowing some businesses to use this type of sign^• She said that she wapted it to read, ^Ms• Gabel said that the City needed some control on these types of si9ns and as long as that control was present, she would be comfortable with it providing that criteria established for a Special Use Permit took traffic patterns into consideration^• Ms• Gabel indicated that on Page 7, paragraph 8, the MOTION read ^Illuminated si.gn which changes in either color or in intensity of light or is animated, or has flashing or intermittent lights {including traveling electronic message centers or electronic message centers which change more than once every 15 minutes except one giving time, temperature, or other public information} be allowed only in C and M Districts {and.not in any R Districts} by Tpecial Use Permit ONLY^• � ' ' � � � ' � � ' COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 3, 1977 Pag e 2 Ms• Gabel wanted that particular motion to read; ^Illuminated � A sign which changes in either color or in intensity of light or is animated, or has flashing or intermitt�nt lights {including traveling electronic message centers or electronic message centers whichchange more than once every 15 minutes} be allowed only in C and M Districts {and not in any R Districts} by Special Use Permit ONLY"• Mr� Boardman suygested that the Sign Ordinance indicate that all Message Center signs would require a Special Use Permit• Chairperson Harris said that the intent of the Planning Commission was to do just that� Ms• Gabel felt that the part of the item that read ^which change more than once every 15 minutes^ should be left in the Ordinance• Chairperson Harris indicated that the ^every 15 minutes" could be made part of the criteria that would probably be set up later• There was some discussion regarding the statement ^electronic message centers which change more than once every 15 minutes�'• Ms• 6abe1 felt that the statement should remain in the Ordinance• Mr• Bergman indicated that if that statement was left in, a business {such as Twin City Federal} that had a sign with the time/temperature would have to obtain a Special Use Permit and a variance in order to have their sign• Chairperson Harris felt that public service signs were actually advertising signs• He said that the information draws the attention of the public to the sign that has the business' identification on it• Mr• Boardman suggested a section be set up regarding those signs which require a Special Use Permit• Ms• Gabel indicated that the Sign Committee felt very strongly about that phrase regarding ^every 15 minutes" and she didn't want to lose a"handle^ on it• � Ms• Gabel indicated that on Page 8, the second paragraph, ^Mr• Langenfeld quoted January 11� 1977, Appeals Commission Meeting minutes, which stated that.••••^ should be inserted ahead of the first sentence in the second paragraph• r � , Il I_I Ms• Gabel indicated that on Page 9, the sixth paragraph, should read, ^Ms• Ga6e1 said that the intent of the Sign Committee should be to identify an establishment and not to advertise a product^• Ms• Gabel indicated that on Page 11+ Paragraphs 4, 6, & 7, should reference "variances^ and not ^Special Use Permits^• ' , f-1 ' l.J � � � I � � � � PL�ANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 3 Ms• Gabel corrected the fifth paragraph, page 13, to read, "Ms• Gabel said that the Committee's definition of a readerboard should be that a readerboard could be a••••••••••^ Ms• Gabel said that on Page 14, item 5{c}, second paragraph, should read, ^Ms• Gabel said that the Sign Project Committee had wanted a 1�0 sq• ft• sign• She felt that the emergency siqn in {c} should be much larger•••••••^'• Ms• Gabel indicated that on Page 17, item 7, third paragraph second sentence, should read, ^He requested Ruben to work some on this item^• Ms• Gabel corrected the second paragraph in item 7, page 17, to read, "Ms• Gabel responded that generally the idea was if the sign was 50i delapitated, it must meet tMe code; or, if because the sign had been repaired and then brought 50i into compliance with the code, then the total sign would have to be brought up to code•^ She said that this was the paragraph that {as stated above} Mr• Acosta would try to ^clean up^• Ms• Gabel explained that the point that was trying to be made was that if someone had a sign and started to repair it or fix it up and by fixing it, they wind up bringing it S�i into compliance, then they would have to bring their total sign into compliance� MOTION by Ms• Gabel, seconded by Mr• Langenfeld, that the minutes of the July 27, 1977, Planning Commission meeting be approved as amended• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• The minutes were approved at 8:05 P•M• RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: JULY 19, 1977 Mr• Langenfeld added the title, ^Councilwoman^ to Carroll Kukowski*s name listed under Memhers Present on the first page of the minutes• He also corrected the spelling of Louis Doyle listed under Members Present• Mr• Langenfeld corrected the spelling of Mr• Loken's name on page 5, third paragraph• � Mr• Langenfeld indicated that the July 19, 1977, meeting had been a very interesting meeting• He said the the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency had given a really nice presentation• , r � � , i MOTION by Mr� Langenfeld, seconded by Mr• Storla, that the Planning Commission, receive the Environmental Quality Commission minutes of July 19, 1977, as amended• 11pon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously- The minutes were received at 8:13 P:M- � � , � � t � � � � PLANNING COMMISSION �EETING — AUGUST 3, 197Z Page 4 RECEIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTE.S: JULY 26, 1977 MOTION by Mr• 8ergman, seconded by Mr• Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission receive the Community Development Commission minutes of July 26, 1977� Mr• Langenfeld indicated that the word ^PARK^ should be used when referring to the Island of Peace "Park^• Chairperson Harris wanted to know who was responsible for all the dead trees on Gil Hodge's Island• Mr• Langenfeld indicated that they were the responsibility of the City• He said that since the Island was to be left in its natural state, he didn't think the City would get a crane and a ferry and go and start taking the trees down• Chairperson Harris indicated that the City had a Shade Tree Ordinance• Mr� Langenfeld said that it was, indeed, the responsibility of the City• Mr• Bergman indicated that the Commission had reviewed the proposed Parks and Open Space Plan and he said that the Staff had done a sizable job and put forth much effort into that ^preliminary^ proposal• He pointed out that the Commission had motioned to concur with the Parks & Open Space Plan with the considerations tha� were listed on Page 5 of the ninutes• UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motiori carried unanimously• The Community llevelopment Commission minutes were received at 8:20 P.M• RECEIVE PARKS & RECPEATT_ON COMMISSION MIN�TES� JULY 25, 1977 MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr• Bergman, that the Planning Commission receive the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of July 25, 1977� Mr• Langenfeld asked for the actual dates involved when, on � page 3, paraqraph 5, first sentence, ^Mr, Kirk informed the Commission that most of thE summer programs were ending that week and the following week^• � Mr• Peterson responded that the weeks referred to were the weeks of July 25, 1977 and August 1� 1977• � � � 5C � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 5 5 D , ' � � Mr• Bergman thought it was great that there were lights on the Tennis Courts• However, he said that he drove past the Courts on a particular rainy night, and the lights were on in the Tennis Courts; and, of course, there was no one playing tennis- He felt, that since everybody is concerned about energy conservation, that perhaps something could be done to remedy that particular situation• Mr• Peterson indicated that that had been mentioned before• He explained that the lights were on a timer and he posed the question of ^who do we have to turn the lights off on the nights it rains^• He said that Fridley no longer had a Park Ranger• ' Mr• Peterson mentioned that the Tennis Courts definitely did get a lot of night use and that there was no neighborhood objections to the lights remaining on until midnight• , Mr• Peterson pointed out that the Commission was not solving all the problems in the Riverview Heights area 6ut that they were making an effort to satisfy the Community to give them 1 a variety of activities within the allotted space {he referred to Item C on Page 5 of the Parks 8 Recreation Commission minutes}. � UPON A VOI�E.VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• The minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of July 25, 1977, were received at 8:23 P.M- � � � � 1• CONTINUED: PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE Chairperson Harris brought Mr• Boardman and Mr• Bergman up to date on what had transpired at the previous meeting• Mr• Peterson commented that he felt the previous meeting had been a very worthwhile and productive meeting• He said that the meeting had probably been one of the best Planning Commission meetings that he had attended for as long as he had been on the Commission {3+ years}. There was some discussion regarding the sign companies and their ' objections to Fridley proposing to not allow ANY billboards in the City• Ms� Gabel pointed out that the original intent of the Sign Ordinance, when it was first written, was to at some point � in time, going to eliminate billboards• She questioned how much legal ground that knowledge gave the City, but that had been the original intent• � � I1 ' PLANNING �OM�ISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Paqe 6 5 E � LJ f ' , ' Chairperson Harris indicated that the existing signs would be ^grandfathered^ in� He said that the situation would be that there would be no new billboards and also any sign that was over 507, destroyed or whatever, couldn't be replaced• Mr• Bergman said that that was not the total view taken two years ago when it was tried to tie in the life span of each of the existing billboards to a^lease termination date^ and at that point, out they would have gone• He went on to say that the City Council had backed off on the end dates that had been proposed by the Planning Commission• Mr- Boardman pointed out that by forbidding billboards, to a certain degree, City would be intruding on a citizen's right of free speech• He said that when that ^free speech^ started to make aesthetic impositions on the Community, that would be where the Courts would start drawing the'line• Mr• Boardman wasnit sure how the determination was made as to whether a billboard was aesthetically pleasing or not• , Chairperson Harris said that City cannot dictate to the Sign �ompanies what they put on their signs {as long as it wasn't obscene or pornographic}. He said that City cannot control � the advertising that was on the sign itself once a permit was issued for the sign• Chairper.son Harris felt that the City did have the right not to issue a permit for a sign• , Ms• Gabel commented that there were two states that did not have billboards — Vermont and Hawaii• She also said that Brooklyn Park did not have or allow billboards• Mr• Boardman had questions regarding Readerboards• Ne asked that if a Readerboard was allowed with a Special Use Permit, then mould advertising signs be allowed with a Special Use Permit; and if advertising signs would be allowed with a Special Use Permit, then wouldn't the billboards be back in the realm of a Special Use permit• He wanted to know how the bill- boards and other advertising signs would be handled• He felt that the item would cause some conflicts• Mr• Boardman pointed out that a readerboard could be allowed by a Special Use Permit and that readerboard could be an advertising sign• He said that the Ordinance then read that advertising signs would not be allowed• Ms• Gabel said that as she had stated at the previous meeting that traveling message centers would be brought into the same thing that Mr• Boardman was pointing out; if the message was advertising a product, then it would not be allowed• � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AU6UST 3, 1977 Page 7 5F , Mr• Langenfeld pointed out that the Commission had been referring to Readerboards, as such• . Mr• Boardman said ' on a readerboard not allowed• � � � � ' � that the Commission was saying that advertising would be allowed, but that advertising signs were Mr• Peterson pointed out that what the Commission was most concerned with was the businessman within Fridley that depended on Reader6oard advertisement for the economic well—being of their Company• Mr• Boardman wanted to know if the Commission was trying to control Readerboards or the allowable free—standing advertising sign with the Special Use Permit; and, if so, he wanted to know what criteria they planned to use• Chairperson Harris indicated that Mr• Boardman's statement was correct� He said that the criteria would be the size, the construction, and there would be some statement regarding the health, safety, and welfare for the location of the signs• He felt that a readerboard at certain locations could very well be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the general public• He said that if the person applying for the Special Use Permit did not meet the criteria, then he would not be issued the Permit• ' Mr• Boardman said that the Ordinance would not allow any advertising signs in any districts except under special conditions allowed by Special Use permits• He indicated that those conditions � would be to allow advertising signs of a certain square footage, as an integral part of an identification sign that is directly related to products and services available upon that site � Mr• Boardman indicated that under the district regulations 8D, sq• ft• would be the maximum size per development• He said that within that maximum 80 sq• ft• City was indicating the ' maximum square footage of readerboard or advertising which would all have to fall under that 80 sq� ft• He wanted to know if the Commission wanted to put a maximum size on the readerboards• ' Ms• Gabel felt that if a business had a readerboard, that would be the sign• She said that the maximum of 80 sq• ft• had to be adhered to anyways• � Mr• Boardman agreed.that the readerboard size would not have to be limited since only 8� square feet of signage is allowed• , He indicated that he liked the section that restricted the total square footage of signage to 80 square feet• � , � L� , � ' , � , ' ' � ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 8 Chairperson Harris commented on the message center signs as to whether they were public service signs or not• He wanted to know how the existing Ordinance handled the signs, such as the Twin City federal Time/Temperature signs• Mr• Boardman said that the existing Ordinance allowed the time/temperature signs� . Chairperson Harris thought that the Twin City Federal time/ temperature signs were very clever advertising signs• He said that a person's attention is drawn to the sign to read the time/ temperature, and at the same time the person also reads the Twin City Federal sign. Mr• Bergman said that the same type of advertising is done by Perkins when they use the American Flag• At that point a brief discussion arose discussing the proper respect that should 6e shown to the American Flag• Ms• Gabel felt that it was most disrespectful that {perki.ns} leaves the American Flag outside during inclimate weather• She said that it WAS NOT ALLOWED to be left outside during inclimate weather, whether it is lighted properly or not• Mr• Boardman indicated that Item 12 of the Definitions {204•02} of the proposed Sign Ordinance should be changed to read, 12• Changeable Copy Sign {putomatic}: A sign such as an electronically or elECtrically controlled time, temperature and date sign message cer�ter or reader board, wh�re different copy changes are shown on the same lamp bank• He removed the words ^public service^ from the description• Mr• Boardman indicated that Item 29 of the Definitions {204•02} , of the proposed Sign Ordinance should be changed to read, 29• Reader Board: Denotes a manual changeable copy sign• He added the word ^manual^ to the description• � � , , 1 , 1 Mr• Boardman indicated that Item 33 of the Definitions {204•02} of the proposed Sign Ordinance should be changed to read, 33- Sign Area: The total area of the sign including the border and the surface which bears the advertisement••••- Mr• Boardman indicated that Item 9 of Signs Prohibited in all Districts {214•031} of the proposed Sign Ordinance should read, 9• Iiluminated sign which changes in either color or in intensity of light or is animated, or has flashing or intermittent lights• 5G ' , ' ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Paqe 9 Ms• Ga6e1 asked about the definition of flashing signs• Mr• Boardman said that a definition of flashing signs had been added to the proposed Sign Ordinance• Ms• Gabel asked if the City had turned their sign off yet� Mr• Boardman said that the City had been ordered on p8/01/77 to turn their sign off• Chairperson Harris indicated that it had takeri Council action for the City to follow their own Sign Ordinance• Mr• Boardman indicated that Item 15 of Signs Prohibited in all , Districts {27,4-03],} of the proposed Sign Ordinance should be eliminated entirely from that section and moved to a new section that would follow section 214•p43 and name the section , "Signs Permitted With Special Use Permits^• He felt that a separate section was needed for these special signs• ' There was some discussion on Section 214•�48 {a} regarding the requiremant of a comprehensive sign plan for multiple use buildings of three or more businesses•••. � � ' � ' ' ' � , , ' Mr� Boardman indicated that the Si�n permit is issued to the owner of a building and generally office space is leased from the owner of the building and he would be the one who would have to submit a �lan• Mr� Boardman indicated that City would have no control over the types of businesses in a building; they would have control over the sign only. Mr• Bergman wanted to know the number of Special Use Permit involvements that were being proposed� Mr• Boardman indicated that the only Special Use Permit involvements would be for the changeable copy signs• Mr• Bergman asked if there would ever be a possibility that a special use permit request would be denied for the time/ temperature type sign• Chairperson Narris indicated that in certain cases thai type of sign would be disapproved• If the Commission felt that that siqn wouid be detrimental to health, safety, and welfare of the general public, the request for a Special Use Permit would be denied• 5 !i 1 ' ' � ' ' , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 10 Mr• Boardman next discussed the Section 214.05 {General Requirements} item 3{Fees}• He wanted to know if the Commission wanted the item to read as it originally was, ^The annual permit fee and expiration date shall be as provided in Chapter 11 of this code^• Mr. Boardman felt that the word ^annual^ should be deleted. Mr. Peterson indicated that the word ^annual" had been removed at the previous meeting• He said that he had made the MOTION and Ms. Gabel had seconded it, to change the item to read, ^There shall be a one-time permit fee^• Mr. Bergman asked that it be indicated somewhe�es in the Ordinance that there will be semi-annual inspections• Chairperson Harris said that inspections would have to be done by policy• " Ms• Gabel said that if the inspections had to be done by policy, they wo�ldn't be done at all- Mr• Boardman ' Permit than permit• indicated that the City can't charge more for a it would cost the Administrative Staff to issue that ' Mr. Bergman said that that was the idea behind the semi-annual maintenance program, to defray the cost of the inspections• Mr• Boardman disagreed with the idea of charging a business that , ha� a good sign and kept the sign well maintained an annual inspection fee• � Ms• Gabel indicated that that was thz Chamber of Commerce's feelings also• ' Ms• Gabel said that presently there was no system for maintenance and there would continue to be no system for maintenance, so she wanted to know why the City was writing a Sign Ordinance• ' Mr• Boardman said that if the Commission wanted a system of reviewing all the si9ns every two years, then they would have to find a system of charging for it• , � ' , � ' Mr• Bergman indicated that it had been the general idea to set up a citizenry committee to find out what the citizens wanted not what the Staff wanted. He said that a key concern of that committee had to do with the appearance of the signs• He felt that a citizenry committee was a good focal view regarding appearance- He didn't feel that the citizenry view should be white-washed by way of administration costs. 5I , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 19?7 Page 11 5J ' ' '�J I J �I , � 1 �J , ' ' Ms• Gabel indicated that she had voted in favor of deleting the fee but she had understood that it would not mean the deletion of the inspections• She said that if the Gity did not have any provisions to have some type of maintenance and enforcement, then the City did not need a Sign Ordinance• She indicated that she did vote for the one-time permit fee because she did agree with what the Chamber of Commerce had said but if the City couldn't find some way to enforce/maintain the Ordinance, then the Sign Ordinance would be worthless. Mr. Peterson said that he took exception to the fact that when one talked about a citizenry committee, in terms of a Sign Committee, there was no way that Staff scientifically made sure that the members had been a cross-section of the citizens� He felt that it should very carefully be indicated that the. Committee was composed of citizens that were appointed but he said that it was not really a citizenry committee which really re�lected the total opinion of the citizens of Fridley• Chairperson Harris said that the Chamber of Commerce had had their fair ^shake^ at the previous meeting• Mr• Peterson said that they had been heard at the previous meeting, but pointed out that the Commission was presently changing some of the things that the Chamber of Comrr�erce was most adamant about• Mr• Peterson pointed out that of a11 the people in his residential block, no one had ever approached him regarding anything about signs. He wanted to know where the ^drive^ was coming from to have a Sign Ordinance• He said he didn't believe that the Council was being flooded with citizens objecting to signs• He wanted to know where the big ^push^ for getting rid of signs was coming from. Ms,• Gabel pointed out that the original idea was not to eliminate all signs but to clean-up the signs• She said that the Sign Project Committee wanted to ciean-up the signs that Fridley had to make it more aesthetically pleasing. ' Mr• Bergman said that the Project Committee was a citizenry committee• He said he wasn't sure of their limitations or their qualifications, and he said that they did not represent the total citizenry of Fridley because there were only five ' peaple• He said that the intent of setting up the Project Committee was to get citizenry input• He agreed that it had been done in a limited fashion• He said that the people ' weren't necessarily neighborhood representatives, but they were in essence a Citizenry Committee• ' , ' ' L� , � ' ' J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Pa e 12 Mr• Boardman pointed out that a Project Committee was not set up to get a total cross-section view of a problem. He said a Committee was set up for looking into some of the problems and to come up with certain recommendations to help solve some of the problems that the Commission would not have time to get involved in all the details/problems. He said that the Staff did want to get all the input it could from the citizens, but that a Project Committee was set up to look at a certain project/ problem. Ms• Gabel pointed out that a project Committee had to operate on a very limited basis in terms of making any decisions• She said that a Committee generally did not have any Staff resource or any legal aid. She indicated that one point that kept coming across was that the present Sign Code was not being enforced� She felt it was important that some means was founcJ to make the Sign Ordinance work once it was finished- She asked what good a Sign Ordinance was if a way was not decided to make it work. She indicated that she was all in favor of not putting that burden on the business-person� ' Mr. Bergman said that there had been enou9h discussion regarding the disadvantages of charging the business person the inspection fee• He wanted to know what would be a better method• He said he liked the results of the inspection fees= He pointed out that ' the project committee had not been limited in their vision and they had said that the maintenance was not being enforced and the appearance was bad. Mr. Peterson felt that the Sign Project Committee had done a good job that had involved a lot of hard work. He said that his only objection was, that in definition, they were the citizenry of Fridley because that they were not= He said that the Committee was a group of citizens that had been given an assignement• He didn't believe that the City should place a burden on the citizens of Fridley who had the ^misfortune^ of owning a business and providing services and employment opportunities within the City• He had gotten tfie impression many times that the Planning Commission was trying to put the business in Fridiey out of Fridley. He felt that if City would charge a business person an inspection fee for his sign, the effect would not solve any problem especially since there has been a sign at *he Mall that had been present for many years from a defunct business and the sign is still there. He said that the City could have charged all they wanted and that sign would have continued to become more and more delapitated• 5 l: ' PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING — AU6UST 3, 1977 Paae 13 ' �r• Boardman said that if the City qot into systematic enforcement of the Sign Ordinance, it would involve a great deal of Staff time, Staff that the City didn't have, Staff that would be taken from ' other important issues facing the City. He indicated that there were many City Codes that should have systematic enforcemen�• He said that the City had to rely on the citizens' complaints and 5L visual inspections• He said that Staff did take City tours every so ' often and would make notes of the thin9s that needed repair. He said that letters would be sent to those businesses that were in violation of the code• ' ' ' Ci , Mr. Peterson explained that reasoning behind changing the item to a^one-time permit fee^ had been the understanding that the person who had the sign would have to maintain the sign and if he received a complaint from the City, then he�could be told to either take the sign down or repair it• Chairperson Harris explained that the enforcement on any of the signs that required a Speciai Use Permit, it could be added into the criteria that the sign would be reviewed by Staff annually• Ms� Gabel saitl that generaIly the signs that needed Special Use Permits were the more expensive signs and those people are most likely going to properly maintain their signs- ' Chairperson Harris poi�ted out that the Special Use Permits were required for all changeable copy signs that would include any readerboards, manual or automatic• He said that he was sure that one of the criteria for the Special ' Use Permit would be the item indicating that there would be an annual inspection. ' Mr• Bergman pointed out that the Sign Project Committee had gone through the city of Fridley with the specific purpose of observing the signs• Ne said that the general public did not pay as close attention to all the signs as did the Project Committee- ', He indicated that the Project Committee had studied all the signs and had reported that the maintenance was not good• He said that unless the Commission went out and paid equal attention to the signs, t they had no right to say that the signs looked good and didn't need enforced maintenance• I _J , � , ' Ms• Gabel indicated that the maintenance on MOST signs in Fridley was lousy. Mr. Storla inquired when the first complaint on the King Chalet sign was received• Mr. Boardman explained to the Commission the variety of actions that had taken place regarding the King Chalet's sign• � 1 f1 ' � ' ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGLJST 3, 1477 Pacae 14 Ms• Gabel felt that the City's "complaint system^ was not adequate enough because she didn't think that the City handled complaints properly• Chairperson Harris asked how many signs, totally, there were in the City of Fridley that would have to be included in an annual inspection• Mr. Boardman commented that there were close to 5,000 signs in Fridley that would have to be inspected annually• Mr• Storla left the Planning Commission meeting at 9:28 P.M- because of previous committments• There was a discussion regarding the cost of hiring one full-time Sign Inspector who would inspect all the signs in Fridley on a bi-annual basis• The cost for this proposed Sign Inspector would be charged back to the businesses in Fridley that would be having their signs inspected• , The question of the costs of sign permits came up in the discussion. Mr� Boardman told the Commission that the fee for a Sign Permit for a sign up to 40 sq. ft• was $10. He said that the fee for , a Sign Permit over 40 sq= ft• was $25• Chairperson Harris felt that the Permit Fees should be the same, ' as the proposed fee schedule would be the same• He didn't like the idea of the two separate fees being charged for the sign permits• � ' , , Ms. Gabel agreed with the decision that the City could not ,enforce all the codes that were in existence• She pointed out that there were some codes that more obviously would need enforcement than others• Ms. Gabel indicated that it had been OBVIOUS to the 3ign Project Committee that most people were not maintaining their signs Mr. Boardman indicated that he had personally driven around the City of Fridley a�d he had made it a point to look at the signs• He didn't see that there was that much of a maintenance problem- Ms• Gabel indicated that she had voted to delete the annual fee, ' and she didn't want to have to add the extra staff, but she did want to know how to enforce sign maintenance better than it was presently being handled• , � ' 5 h1 � CI LJ LJ 1 • � ' ' ' 5 �J Mr• Boardman indicated that possibly more staff time could be devoted to the enforcement of sign maintenance• He said that possibly three times a year Staff personnel could spend a few hours touring the city• He felt that By driving out in the community they would be able to catch a lot of the maintenance problems• Mr• Boardman felt that most of the signs in Fridley were kept up and prnperly maintained because the business person that put that sign up is using the sign as the identification sign and that person would want the sign to be in good order and to look nice• Mr• Boardman felt that 85i - 9�i of the signs in Fridley are properly maintained• He didn't believe that the annual fee would achieve what the Sign Code wanted to achieve• He wasn't sure it was worth the cost of a Sign Inspector just for that 1�i — 15i that were in violation• Ms• Gabel said that when she voted for the one-time permit fee that she had been under the impression that there would be some provisions provided to enforce the proper maintenance of the $ign Ordinance• She felt that if there was a way Staff could handle this witFiout a permit fee, she indicated that it would be acceptable to her- Mr• Boardman said that the Staff would much rather increase their staff time for that purpose• He felt that Staff would be able to catch the majority of the problems ' Mr• Peterson said that he understood Mr• Boardman said that the Planning Cornmission would send both the July 27th and the August 3rd proposals on to Gity Council• He wanted to know . exactly what the procedure would be• , CI ' Chairperson Harris indicated that if the Planning Commission wanted to, both proposals could be sent on to City Council- MOTION by Mr• Bergman, seconded by Mr� Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission reconsider Section 214•�5 {General Requirements}, Item 3{Fees}. Upon a voice vote, Mr• Bergman voting aye, Ms• Gabel abstained, and Mr• Harris, Mr• Langenfeld, and Mr• Peterson voting nay, the motion failed• ' Ms• Gabel indicated that she had abstained because she felt that she couldn't misrepresent what had come out of the Sign Project Committee but she also couldn*t misrepresent her own feelings• ' ' ' ' ' MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Ms• Gabel, that the Planning Commission send the:proposed Sign Ordinance a amended on to City Council, but the Planning Commission wou��'have a chance to proof-read the Ordinance at the next meeting before City Council acts, so that corrections, if any, could also 6e included• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• Chairperson Harris declared a short break at 9:56 P.M- Chairperson Harris called the meeting back to order at 10:06 P.M• ' PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 16 50 ' i u LJ � � � � i MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr• Langenfeld, that the Planning Commission suspend the rules and handle CODE OF ETHICS next on the agenda• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• 3• CONTINUED: CODE OF ETHICS= Mr• Bergman indicated that the Community Development Commission had discussed the Code of Ethics at the July 26, 1977, meeting• He said that the Commission had moved to accept the Code of Ethics as stated� Mr• Bergman said that the three Commi.ssion members that had been present at the July 26th meeting individually had no problems with the Code of Ethics• He said that not much thought had been given as to whether anyone else would have personal problems with it• Mr• Langenfeld said that he had called each member of the Fridley Environmental Commission in order to get their inputs regarding the Code of Ethics• He said that Bruce_Peterson had said he was for it but he felt that the penalty was too severe and suggested something to the effect of dismissal- He said that Dave Sabistina said that he couldn't see that particular code of ethics app,licable to any of the Commission people• He felt that the Mayor and other ^high city officials^ should be subjected to the Code• Mr• Langenfeld said that Lee Ann Sporre said that it would be wonderful and felt it should be applied to all the Staff• She had said that Fridley was now a large City and they should have such a Code of Ethics• Mr• Langenfeld said that Connie Metcalf was on vacation and couldn't be reached• � Mr• Langenfeld said that he liked the proposed Code of Ethics• He felt that in certain cases a conflict of interest would have been detrimental to the decision making process at any level• He said that he agreed with the Code• He indicated that he � felt the penalty was too severe• He felt that dismissal would be adequate penalty , r � ' ' � MOTION by Mr• Langenfeld, seconded by Ms• Gabel, to accept the Ordinance establishing a Code of Ethics for City Officials as written bearing in mind the comments made by the various Commissions• Mr• Peterson questioned the legality of the Code of Ethics in terms of discrimination• He didn't feel that Section 30•01� Subdivision 3, second sentence, ^Financial interest shall apply to real or personal properties owned by the person making the disclosure and by said person's spouse, children, mother or father ^ should apply• He felt that tliat statement was a real invasion of privacy• , PLANNING C4MMISSION f1EETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 17 , Ms• 6abe1 said that she had been led to believe that there were some amendments to the Code of Ethics• She wanted to know if perhaps what Mr- Peterson was saying was not one of the • amendments� ' � ' � � , ' 11 ' Chairperson Harris said that the Planning Commission could recommend that as an amendment Chairperson Harris said that he would have problems with that section of the Code of Ethics• He said that, indeed, he could disclose any financial interests that his chi'ldren had since . they were minors• He said that there would be no way he could disclose what financial intersts his parents had if they chose not to tell him� The Commission members were curious as to where this Ordinance came from• Ms� Gabel said that the Code of Ethics Ordinance was modeled aft.er the Golden Valley {ode of Ethics• Mr• peterson felt that the Ordinance establishing a Gode of Ethics for City Officials, as written, was an invasion of privacy• He felt that since he chose to serve on the Commission that his family shoul.d not have to diclose their financial interests• He said that they were not the ones serving on the Commission and that they had the right to their privacy• Mr• Bergmart said that he was mainly looking at the intent of the Ordinance and that he was in favor of the intent• Mr• peterson said that he was in favor of the intent also because he was in favor of good government• He said that the intent was good but if a bad orBinance was being written`" then he suggested correcting the.Ordinance and keeping the i�tent and limiting the scope of who it would apply to• Chairperson asked if the person making the motion wanted to amend the motion to concur and motion to strike the words ^spouse, children, mother, father^ from the Ordinance• Mr• Bergman said that he felt that the word ^misdemeanor^ shouid be changed to dismissal• Chairperson Harris said that the Planning Commission could make an amendment to the motion that was on the floor at that time to make the above changes, without first acting on the original motion• � ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6 — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 18 S Q , � � , � � � Ms• Gabel said that City Council had already passed the first reading of the Code of Ethics• She wanted to know what would happen to the suggestions that were made that night• Chairperson Harris said that the City Council could amend the Ordinance before the second reading• There was a brief discussion regardirig the word ^misdemeanor^ and what could result from that severe of a penalty• ' Mr• Bergman referenced section 30•31 of the Code of Ethics• He thought the word ^permarient^ should be added to the comment, ^•••each member of any commission or committee shall file,•••••^• The neW statement would read, ^�•••each . member of any permanent commission or permanent committee•••^• Mr• Peterson felt that committee should have been striken completely from the Code of Ethics• Mr• Langenfeld referenced the second sentence under Subdivision 1 of Section 30•01 of the Code af Ethics• He read the sentence, ^In recognition of this goal, there is hereby established a code of ethics for public ofTicials, elected and appointed, and for top level city employees•^ He then went on to read the definition of ^top level city employees^• He said it stated, ^the term top level city employee shall include the City Manager etc•^ The reason Mr• Langenfeld brought this item up was that he definitely though� that the City Manager should be included in the Code of Ethics� He said that the City Manager sets the policy as to the City Attorney, etc• Chairperson Harris said that the Ordinance specifically spelled out the Commissions, the Council, and the City Attorney• Mr• Langenfeld pointed out that if some of the amendments that were indicated were redundant to an already existing amendment, '' then City Council could decide what to do since the planning Commission did not have a copy of the amendments• ■ Mr• Peterson suggested that Section 30•�1, Tubdivision 3, the �� second sentence be changed to read, ^Financial interest shall apply to real or personal properties owned by the person making � the disclosure^• He said that he would Iike to see the remainder of the sentence deleted• � � � , . ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 19 , Mr• Langenfeld said that since this Ordinance is different and unique from the usual ordinance, he felt that the penalty of misdemeanor was Coo severe and he wanted the penalty to be dismissal of the individual• Mr• Bergman referenced Section 30•31, subdivision 1� He said that it should read, ^within 30 days after the effective date of this code of ethics, each member of any permanent commission or permanent committee shall file, ••••^� Mr• Bergman said that Section 3D•10 should read, ^The provisions of the code of ethics shall be applicable to all members of the city council and the following advisory bodies: {her�e list a11 permanent commissions that are subject to this ordinance}rt• Mr• Peterson wanted to know which corporations or interests he would have to list under Section 30•31• Chairperson Harris said that he would only have to list the corporations or interests that he had within the City of Fridley• He indicated that where the person was employed would have to be listed if that Company was located in the City of Fridley or did business with the City of Fridley• Mr• Bergman said that the statement ^to the best of my knowledge^ would have to be included someplace in the Ordinance before a person should sign his name• Discussion took place regarding the disclosure percentages of Si and 1�%• Mr• Peterson made a motion to amend the motion to be consistent throughout the Code of Ethics and to change the 57, to 10i • UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• The motion to accept the Ordinance establishing a Code of Ethics for City Officials ' bearing in mind the comments made by the various Commissions along with the proposed amendments would go to City Council 6y the next meeting when they would have the second reading• Chairperson Harris indicated that the Chamber of Commerce was upset due to some letters that had been written in the area of code enforcement- He said that the Chamber wanted to form a citizens advisory committee• He said that the committee would have a meeting on August 19, 1977, because they believe that there should be some revisions to the Zoning Code• Chairperson Harris said that he had offered them his services to act as a liason between the City/Planning Commission and the advisory committee• 5R , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETTNG — AUGUST 3, 1977 Paqe 20 5 S , Mr• Peterson confirmed the fact people• He inr'ormed Chairperson for a lot.of work• that there are some very unhappy Harris that he had volunteered ' Mr• Boardman explained to the Commission mem6ers the situation they were talking about• He said that about one year ago the City started a City Beautification Program• He said that , they got together with the Chamber of Commerce to get their help in upgrading some of Fridley's business community• He said that letters were sent to businesses in the community ' asking them to volunteer information as to how to beautify their property� Mr• Boardman said that the reason the �ity did this was because there was a Section of the City Code that stated that existing properties must reach the listed conditions by the year 1974� He said that the Gity had been reluctant to enforce that section of the code• Mr• Boardman went on to explain that the City had tried to get compliance of the section through a volunteer program• He said that Staff had gotten very poor response in that aspect on a volunteer basis• He said that the next step that the City took was more of a full compliance aspect• He said that code enforcement letters had been sent out notifying the businesses that they were in violation of certain sections of the City �oning Ordinance• Mr� Boardman said that the Staff had not received that many negative responses to their letters- Chairperson Harris that he had heard• Commission wanted Commission to meet of Commerce• indicated that that was not the ^story" He wanted to know if the Planning a representative from the Planning with the representatives of the Chamber � Ms- Gabel felt that Chairperson Harris would be able to explain different aspects of the Zoning Code because he works with it all the time• ' MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Mr• Bergman, that Chairperson Harris be the official representation of the Planning Commission , to act as a liason between the Commission and the Chamber of Commerce's advisory Committee• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• t , !_ J � , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 Page 21 5� � �• CONTINUED: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE CODE Mr• Bergman commented that during previous meetings it had been agreed that the Planning Commission would keep the wording of the Residential Maintenance Code slanted towards maintenance rather than provisions• , Mr• Boardman suggested that section 220•17, Item 1, be reworded to read, ^Kitchen Facilities: Kitchen facilities in every unit shall be maintained in the following manner:^ There was some discussion regarding whether a heated water supply is required in a Kitchen unit- Mr• Peterson stated that i.f the Uniform Building Code stated that a person has to have a hot water heater in the building, that would cover any requirement• He didn't feel that the Residential Maintenance Code would have to indicate that one was required• He felt, that as long as the Building Code stated that he had to have a hot water heater, all this Code should indicate is that it is in proper working condition• In reference to Item 220•17 Item 1, A, Mr• Peterson suggested that it be worded, ^Where a kitchen sink exists, it must be in proper working condition^• Mr• Boardman made reference to Section 220•16, Item 1, "Minimum Plumbing Standards: All plumbing in every dwelling unit and all shared or public areas, shall be properly installed and maintained in a sanitary, safe, and functioning condition, and,shaLl be connected to an approved utility system in a manner prescribed by the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of Fridley, and by the laws of the State of Minnesota•^ He felt that this item took care of all the discussion that was being had regarding the proper working condition of kitchen sinks and exactly how specific the Code should be• ' Mr• Boardman didn't think it was necessary to list each individual facility in the plumbing system• He felt it would only be redundant to what had already been stated• Chairperson Harris said that Section 220•17, Item 1• A• was taken care of by Section 220•16 and should be scratched• The Planning Commission next discussed Section 220•17, Item 1•B• Mr- Peterson said that the Maintenance Code should be more concerned about the fact that a dwelling has a counter top that half the linoleum is gone and it is open so that water can get in and 6reed germs than if the cabinets are 20 square feet or whatever• He felt the code should address the issue and not address matters of construction• , PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST 3, 1977 page 22 5� Mr� Boardman suggested that Item B of Section 220•17 be reworded to, ^Cabinets, shelves and counter/tables be of sound construction furnished with surfaces that are easily cleanable and that will not impart any toxic or deleterious effect on food•^ The discussion went on to Section 22D•17, Item 1• C• Mr• Boardman suggested that Item 1�C of Section 220�17 be reworded to, ^A stove or similar device for cooking food, and a refrigerator or similar de�ice for the safe storage of food, shall be properly maintained with all necessary connections for safe, sanitary, and efficient operation•^ Chairperson Harris indicated that Section 220•17, Items 2{Toilet Facilities}, 3{�avatory Sink}, and Item 4{gathtu6 or Shower} are all handled 6y Section 220�16 and should be deleted from Section 220•17- Mr• Bergman left the Meeting at 12:19 A•M• , Mr• .Boardman indicated to the planning Commission that he was aware of what the Commission wanted in regards to the Residential Maintenance Code• He suggested that he go through , the remainder of the Code for the next meeting at which time he would present to the Planning Commission a rewrite of those items that needed changing• , ' � � ' , , ' � � Chairperson Harris said that the Pianning Commission would want to look at Section 220•43 {�ompliance} item by item• MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Ms• Gabel, that the Planning Commission continue the Proposed Maintenance Code- Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr• Peterson, seconded by Ms• Gabel, to adjourn the August 3, 1977, Planning Commission Meeting• Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• Chairperson Harris declared the meeting adjourned at 1Z:26 A.M- Respectfully submitted, �� Lt� MaryLee Carhill Recording Secretary , �� , � RECBIVING INFORMATION FROh1 TH� LOCKE LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION YERTAINING TO ' LOCKE LAKE IMPROVEMENT �� , :1 �i�! f =- �c 1� ,�-m..�- �1�.�-.-;, , ' L�J� J � �.!`� � . !,!�r,.�." �� J � `, � , �!�� , �.� �.-�-�- � ��, �� i; � 3-� 1 . v� �'/. _ ._ � r- ; / / lG,'<� f�,: C.�-C/�� ,� • "�u__ lL.�,�-�'�'?' ; � " -�-=-t ��s/ _ _. ,.�; �', � , � ��Ct� �%�v)'a?�C�d.�/t�-�-�� .J ��x-.�e�-� �'i ' G'�n `z�� Cl�t-� G:> �.� � %�-�",!�`�-�-.,�-:z�. �-S' a � � ' � . ' ' � �',�LU��____ G_� ��°`.,,.�� /�,�-��- •�, �7 7 7s�" �; � � - l�y��-' ��1 ��,_ ; -<-�. i , � . �� , _,__� �L,.,-iX- �,-�-�-( �`i-Ec�ti��-r..�_ �J-r>--e-�*--�t ��l�i-c-c./�. ��-z.a-- C�,�—'C �'�'c.c�c�z-c..u.-� 7 � , �/?iL/'_�G � �t�.�`` " �' r-�. �(,ti��-t�- �m-tt' /n-t��'..-c :� 4� . . .. _.. _ .... �('- � �� G��( ��1?��-� _ � _ _ .: _ �_ . � _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ �C� ocr�. o u � __ ' 1 _ ' � /jlr.`�'�yL�c-�,r-=- /�c� �-�. �°�a - %yi� t�'l� U �'',_� : MBMO T0: MEMO FF20M: DAT'E : SUI3JECT: Nasim hf. Qureshi, City Manager Ricliard N. Sobiech, Public Works Director August 11, 1977 Program for Disposal of Substandard Tax Forfeit Properties Please be advised the Public Works Department has been worki.ng with Mike 0'Bannon, County Commissioner, in an attempt to develop a program to dispose of substandard tax forfeit properties. I It is the opinion of hfike 0'Bannon that Anoka County can dispose of these properties in a manner satisfactory to the City of Fridley, therefore, it is suggested an appropriate ' listing of the tax forfeit lots be submitted to the County with comments as to certain circumstances affecting the individual properties. ' Attached for consideration by tne Council is the proposed program which would allow the County to dispose of the pro- perties at a public auction. As you will note certain pro- � perties are stipulated as "Not Buildable Site", "Flood Plain^ and "btust be ComUined for Building 5ite" in an attempt to provide as much information as possible to potential buyers. It is suggested the Council consider this item at the regular Council meeting of August 15, 1977. RNS/jm Attachment: 1 a b O O rl W G H u 0 z G� p H •rl tA u ro w ,-+ a � � ,a a u ,a NH � '� � ' � � � ' ' ' a ,C [A L M F 3 0 z �. c u 7 ' ' ' . ' ' ' � ' ' ` ' _ O U T A G p' ' ' ' ' c ' ` c c c ' .� ' ' ' u u � ro uc c c c c ' ' c c.- c' .� � P � a . �.c c = - � � - = = = � = - oa 7 O N. � � ' ` ' � ' _ ' ' ' � ' ' 'd � O. w m N.a' ' ' ' � ' � ' ` � .. � u G 'q N .-1 � � ' ' ` ' ' ' ' ' � ' ' O' ' ' ' U (�A W CS 1� 1� W fL' r� 04 rx v�' � ai u fi w c� P4 R: w' W, H F N ��'O •.�1y � � k7 W W R'+ W W W 6' N N f`l F. W W W W W W O O O O O O w w w w w w o c o 0 0 3 • o F*] 3 o W W W W r-I ^ W W W W W �-i D. .� m u o°o o°o - m > > .c .c .c ,� .c wao w 7� N 3 6 6 a� u�u a� �� a a G 7C x ai �o rn ao co r� o•.� o u v ,e ,c �o � a�� a a •.+ v m a � u u J-� 'O 'O b� N O O� W W W W W W W ttl M•ri N �D �O vl O O O O O O O U N N W D ltl a z vi a VI 2',7. (n V] ,7.. N V] 7.. '7r � . � .o M 3 ulvl �l O Oo O O000 � Oo J-� N N cv �7 .t .7 �7 �7 .7 �7 �7 t+1 t+1 a o q .� M o H 1+ ,.•L M N O M L+ � N M N �66 a �� .v.� ��m� �c�c�co., x�o.-, o x .1 ri ri m � � ri d >, .-i d .-i .-i .� .-i o ,-i .-i •.+ 3mraw w.-� xww d uw wmww Hwm N 41 W H '.� �-1 .G ' W 7 D W O� �o N W.-� .--� 1�i v�i O 7�n O O O W� .--� .-, '� H�/1 N ul r-I 00 .--i N ('J }� t+l O.-� f�1 M M � C N ^y A ? 1-� IJ J-� M u "d a+ u '� w 1-� � u u 1-� u H a� J.� � a a° a a° w a° x a° a° o° a° w a° a° a a° m a° a° � n � � \ � 8A � . �� 1 1 � ' ' � , �I � 1 1 ' , � ' , � C ,� � a v O O .-I W G H fn w H aH' w 0 P! a H H w � 0 W � A 6 H N a N w O Q' � O a � H Q O W � P'i W m. N � � 0 U C 0 M L � U O a x u b M 3 u O a C 0 ,� w M i .�, � .O 7 � x u N a s� O W N N ro � u �+ � a T u .� U W 6 'd O F+ W .if T 3 x J-� O� � r O .r{ U � .a 7 a •� � u u� N i.� 0 �� 3 � m u� � N o u U V) � v � r,c o q �u �m �a m ro U O •.� o .-i .-� .o W 7: a� x �� o u .0 cn N W 't7 rl � .� o m N 'O w � A "d 7 v � � � 7 O n z .� _ v] - H H F N .� 7 N r'1 a � u G O � �-I N w y � O .� J-� � .-1 � a � u m u q 3 � � o, a a� � O O O U � w �_ P � F'i � -v u u u ,i �� ro U C .� .� �b p� � �rl a� �N O W N L N F'+ 'd •ri t�Jl O U w � .n p v „ � N � � 0 � v�i = b � O H W N N � N P N H N N D � A �+ N O a z� �� C O •ry J-1 N ri � c. M a� m � u M 3 T L C. 7 O v T A G 0 U � u •.� � ro co �-+ a U M '[7 � o A O aa w x� � O N s� u � � R7 N rl r-I O A v, m b v� A � �� L y O 0 ,� z ClJ - R7 N D � W N N N U 1�J 4+ N H .o N H l+ 8 v w y M o > La H N O � �� 0 0 •rl ri �1 L � � a o. •.� +� u u � m � x x� u 8 3 T � � � � � O O c� v T T A A C C o _� o �� 1�.� �ri t�J .rl d `.1° � � m w m w U 'O U 'd •.i O •ri O r+ o r+ o � w A w a� a = .c .z .c w 0o m O nJ O N x �.�i � � � � � � T1 N b N �--I i-I '-I r-I W �'J N ttl N � N "� y •.i p vi 'O u'' .d LQ � U � U p o Q O ,c � ,c z Vl = [i] = b N S�-� U W N 'O C 41 N O w w 3 H w � m w 3 C N t+ p N D A v ^ 7 :� � N O S+ � H 3U' W �r�i .G � 7 � � � U ta W �d 1� W O � O.O O H vi w vi w v� � rn :. �n o� o �n �n v, �n �n �n �n �n �n �n M N tn th N N� N N N N N N t11 N �zz 3 r+ � � � � �O N o� .r N za°a° �� ri ri ww �� N N L U a°a »�a aa ri .�i ri ri �-i ri mwww aam f"1 �1 ul �O �O 1� .-, .� .y .-I N N uNa,u u � O O O O O O aaaa aa xx �� .�-t '-I �-1 .i ca ra w w 00 O� t0 1� N N .�a .-1 W L i� L 0 0 0 0 aa aa x H N a H O W N y � u s� 7 a T a� ,a U �� . '-i .-i .-� w w aa w (+� pl riM M a� u u a°a°a° � n � � � � :� t.� � : *- � . , .� h . �� ., 3 C� , 6 ~ �-: So � � I''� ` -zr.�r �c �,:-.: � "v �c �- � � w'�u"ar�'�+�'`�'�+�� = (;��/ . '. ��' � �� ' � �� i r_.e PLOOD PLAIII v _�Is�u�r � � 6 � �� b � Iic C{� le�` If. p�Y � �� I� `i 1 � � li- .. ��.ix."`�.�.�`'.�'�.�..' °n�.ms:�:��..,,: tr�,�c = 1�'I°°s��'... �� .E,�,�,�� ,' �I _ NOT IN FLOOD PLAIIQ �\� , 1 � ,- p � 3 .�: �� N :J..��7 � 1HStl I � ! . �s�� 4.1 �"".-� �� I � II,—, -_-_�� l:':4 ; .: .c_' 'c . 1 �\. e' � � . �I � I � I� � � ' � . �� O �j : wr � � c � � ��' .� /� , � � � � ' �� iG �� ,� %s�'�/., � �� " � ,' `` / � s � ;� :t - �- � ��o � �n � �.� - ��-� : � � ,_ ;�; � ,t— � � `_� > ll ! I f '7/.0°°/ �3 �',�` W i - ^C^ : .: � Fr / e � . � { � _ {� �,_ � P � �� /� C � . _�.�. 1 `. I - .aF. �.. - �' F�i � 1 �._— 9f ` ! • � P � /.�y laae�s Hin w �2� �� a. �� p �� b� �� (° .y., A �JJ�(S! \ � � . • a+��oZ,,,�/ ' ��6\�. a.. jj11 I �i � �J 1 . �� . I � V �� ♦ �l� 1., �-- � � ; � � �t :s r ' a � PRi� ,, PQff ? [ ° � � , E. . �� i. . , _ �:_ . . C_; � �,ar':` . �.y� �:- s _ � �� y'"�fl`� � , �I' � c.� �✓. a � 1 / ��"- � y'�� y.� Pc�'(. �F.-t ..; .. yl . >* ./�/ Y�iri\ �t �. F- _c C�a xookre �� I I � G� � � � � �' i ; ? I�� ` ? . �-, �� , � , � _ - - � � �o � i� . ['/l� � 3` ; _r , __` p s �: L�,` { _ � + Q_,:.- . �r q � �zr_ � -} -�� _ � � ^Tf—" _�� - � " � � `L� � I I C1 a � �{ _ • .: - � ; -- � l � . ;�sl""r -c-` I ,�� ` ,La l� - T f� � -. ;T � ^ �` " � �� _- .. .� � % t.�' \ Y„{ ��`R�— . / � r.'.� i .-` -'- �Y Y�.:/ lW . � � - `�`� ',1 ' '�- 1 � ,�1 '� �,� +d=�.�".a�'_." -__ �.' ,".- .� _,: -" " i-, � - _ . � S.- V, ..'� -R . . _ . 6 �`_ - r - . .d ° j° / "�� r e E . � � 'z � � :.�+ P��H� �. e� / ` �Y ' ` P _ a : � �� g O a a � c � ak p9��- ��.. - �_��`� \ _4 y . eFC �: � , f, ' `1^ ' i ` � =� � �>= ° _ ' as y�`t Y - b1 F •1 Y :� C i- R T2 . . k-°`� i ' ', V Y ' �l k`` %Ft�s' -� � _ __q.�i. ,z d `� �. /�/. /� ` i '/ yt �,� y � .1 \ , � � � � �:� ��C ky� ; � REVISFD AUDITO?iS �z v � ` � p �. `?,� � � C` �.� ..,j....._.. 1,, 3 q r. 0. Q . ' �.1 . � . � ,. ,, , .� i . . r : ., � -, , , ,,., �� ,� 2 , 8 D --- -. --- ; : � , , � > \� �,, ._ _ - � ` � , . . , . � :, � r,ve. ..� __ �� ... �� i � d \ , � ._ . . � � _ , ,�N W. ;r�. � �� H � � ' � �.• V � I ... ... � � �� tT i ' �__c�� e \l. ' � 1 �' , � �( \ , � a�� "t�:� ; ; 1 , r� � �� 4 cz+ .. �ro,., ' O� � � , A�1. Ll. �. � SU6. N0. 103 � ^ � 4} �Zt'.�� , � �' ;� ' . Y � µ �PK , y ' ' ' .,, , ^ . , � N , s G}' ` n �� yr - ...._ �� -` �1�,.`fi'} G, � r � �� o ��'.. 'S � �� -� :I � . �. ' .;' � .. '_f ' �� ' t� � 1. - 1 J, _ 1 . � -� � , �-- G=� ., \ ,. -- . . � , � d � /S—,. , � �,� 1{ , J� � 3� � ,, .. .� . �a ;. -'+ � � I. �_�r� � � ;" . . i .v . •` a �� 3 � , // � . �i] � � ` \y Y.. ..�: ' i . i � . , �".. .' , , . ,- `< � �ss�ss�PFi e�vo i s �-� . ,:a a z / i i > � � .. : .. > �� . � — - � U I �_ � �r �,, � _ D 5. ' C \/ ' U , ". , t � r ,' . .. y_ ,, �f\ i'' o[/ ��.s c'fFEES z. �1 r ,'; � ,�i , � p�EtSE �- 1 .�. �- ' : LF � - � � . u AVD. $� U �r .• �.r•"' �' -: _ / � � _ ' ,Ai4 � z ; �_- .,, �z . . . _ ,. i �-:-x " . .� a � - • � CITY OF . r ^ h0� 103 15fiEY ' 1 �'_�ry K'� CF�+� 4� COON PAPI S l �(g�. �7:�.t "' :.. ::. � . . '.. . ' — j{� �� f�} �.�`✓y� ��, r• �Y .. •��n —`,,-CI7Y OF..T—\ '''T � .'�_ ., I . . , � r s. /` nr ._. % ' �'jr`v C..20HI�LEY :. ^l3EV . AUD �SU+'�..D ��.p�� . j� ,K�i'R"`�`�Cr TF Ei i � � .,ii - � . . _ �� Q.� �� a�� A FFt01D5 �� F8 � 21 ?2 J2�2425�� 7f✓� . c� E � yr.1 ;� l �ao�� i :.;~ t. _ _ T' y r ^ 1, ° ' rr-'+ i � � . � �� . ✓sVV�� r � . � '�r�'�0 �� . IPC4iOH y STfif T � `�_� � �F..rrr .. �" ��. ' � f s+" � o � • �;'Ch✓Ulh�'%t0�� .�—r i I.. ' : i� rr r � . � , : i . � 9 ' � .. ..�n.��nr , .r�tiW�i/ON I � c: . L 41 �tYTI iil� I' W.%� f��%�� .1'�h (, I � �f F . . -,• L , 1 ~ �� o n � "S .. ° ` ` �� ` ....y" / : ",;t ' ' . � F� < . . . ,a � 1 LL y { y ( .., y t ' T"' [ .�. , -. .. . � 7��l � ' � y�--..�" (? Y 1 o y .'.� � .«�-w '� ,,,. � � ' �... � ,� k� , , � _ � y �. l r U . µ �}�„ � . . ..'`i^' �rn �� . ° F� . •�� I F . .^.-r. ti . V U1 �. N µ�..,n�T`.° 5[0.ECS - i��: .� :,� FAiFMO4i ' � i U?�j I': '� .... �' � �•:�pt yy�r�JNa'nj xs( a l 1'� Z�� r. M 'tr' '' t,. ��i/ x? _Yj '�,.�Q� 1" ... Ay � / � . ' � SO�D V ' Z . �_. ' . J b 1 Y'1 .,r ..✓ •• M �,rY••• "_. Y ^•Arr�� v� � '.i �- � ��I .. � F�:." � ��'��,r' .1� .rY �Ir . y ':N+.'. � SjREFt.. .� ..�� + �, .CIFCLE ° � � � ��.1 � .' �� ,..' � w--' r ..:.�E� ': z -$RP �, C k�'LE t � ✓ � � �T`� t�j.-' . �'�^�F�" � r .i_ _Yr �- ' �� 'P�~4� O �. � � _ 1 . ..,� � ,.• 1 � 13 w'. iN C S ' � . �..- . . .,. , „�`. J ' s«.^ _: � } ., , w J ; ,e � .. - nN �• 5C S � ��Rµo�Y...}^ }.:.:� "�FS.. i �t` .. � �, . � � . ..:. STRti- . (.' m _.... - �� } ' � . � nl'�r� � �r' , __. r ' � i . d--yfS.H- � . � � ' � _ . _ . . .. . . . ' y H!1 / CV P �I)IOk!- � [n {� W(�s �YO( (�' ((/��, /�//�f I U/ 4f I nl' sn �� V K/ � P 1 � �q (j �� (ti�� "Illrf ♦f(LCIN( 1Nl. Y �� / 41 1'1{I Hr.r LI YIiVfU'.('� A'. C/T Y OF FRiDL E Y �• ;. �., �, �, <.,�.,„„ 4(CLY5Cp5 rWl�h� r , 8 —E --:--53.�/. . ' - . �� ':� .. .., _ U , ,. , ;� - .�_,.O ' t�.R �Q, 19 .=�\ ;t`_ �; . . . ... � c4<<..,.,:n L S ,,:. ,. ..... � - � � .�/�� i � Mississivri sra��r � \ � � :'; � �.- � � .. .—� �'—�-- � . � . � � /�'� li l �Oh(d$�tl �� a�� w - i� ; � � F .T._ �j � , 4 ...-� H S ,! � i,. �2 ` ' _ � -1il � 1—� t Z�r�j"x i RIVER� � NG��; �3 a Q � V w �fl� A jDD I } � �� !1lCfi �„� � � � _ � I f Lp�t, kL � � 13 � �; t ' �l y^'` t � -- ".,13 7 }r. j Jj . . , � � - .� II. ,-- w4l'f �ii ` J'�_�` � .--� r �` . .- � ' �-� � b '4 E� i f� � o �<' —_ °` r� � �srt.v�r� � _:�,�--VcIjS ` �27 c � 4 � : _ r t - , " w �•�' 1 �i /�ILL S 1 '� �`` <F:� r,=A��fij°" `` � s -- " �' ° ��re a x ' ' �� ,� " �Z� � ��/' � � SF7ELUi�� LkWE i P001 . � i �' "'. � .S'Z3 R c9�. � � - 64�?ti�_ WAY � � — � ��L ��y$10!'i O 30:,' � �8: � �ji ��r'e ss U ••�S {.�� Ld , 1, � "`°$U'� 3i �,�. . � ��z' � � �. � "' A z --- ` �� . �` �L . ) I � ' J ,. � 1 � i.Y�'. < 9C'VM L 1�`� YiQY ��.. rt.. b2iS��tfH25lr.1) �� I�"1 C1' � m rA y. � I(' I� T L 63512 ' v i : 63 V2 KAY A�� 7 �� SYLVA� LANE , �. . ` � r s �..,�_- � ` . � , � m _. ERICF'$Oi��? w _ � � i t : �� I � Y � n�a9i�_��.rr��z i i� L� '�' l � :�� m ' � R/f�ER�s .0 1 �-� ^�' •.,. - // . . i � ` ! 7 A ... (� _ : .i I � � i � ' < y �E3 -W4_y_ .. h'� r- i ri '.�7 z z � , ' � 1 � ; 1..� J --.— c,t�—� ' � : .r i s 63 RD ' � Y(AY � , -�. ... TPo�TY D -1 �� 1' %\ • � ...r� .hfAhl7R ... `� '� .. \� .'� ` • � � e .� � I � � ` "i � ',. � � � 'AL: ROS` �� i !DN i S , , � . , . � ,; � ` , - 1 { � �`° � ; ze -1 �� „ � v''I 3a � a atn .�,� .��.� . a � . ' / r.:- w —'� � 2 4 �^� � rrnu :�z/� r p�-3 .•Io : r + �,� � � - �� ADD��ON J r- ' se uz _ war � z � � � , � e . �� '1 '! t 3� � � � JULf; ,ANhi , .j � i'w y,i... ��.��:., a ::, � �� z i , � � �, � �}jp ��—�� -� � = � �,._._.�.��/_� 5 `��, 7 O i � ; ' ! �• � � ,' . 5 ; � }'F /3 N f3 /( /".i/ .Y+ i : � } /� � � . � .�r l r. � 5`, RODlT/ON gGX�LrZ : I—.. .¢ b .. � � '� J ; POTASfX _� ' a `�AOD�TION � 6 MD � WAY ; __.,.. A �, ._ . � . ... r—'` � � `"�'.: F s'w'_..."_y."�O - - T v.r .� 1 -� ii `� � r-R1 .. . '/ip) )LTi JV .. .. j' � ;; , " .i;' � �- .. •�nN �� ± — I V _.�$ � ` v "�°'4 � .. RIYEft ED6E 'd:. �TT�_- � I � '.. o . . ' t �'� s �3� '�� r,iei,�a s.'.e.� .� �?_��.; � 1 . .r� �y�g,l � _ i � �(�� . . .. . = W ��.. . . � � i. L {�7r (�E.. .,. . 2 .. -/�a 611/2 WAY r �. ..e o ." � � �. ,lej,^D � . . .. I1 � s � ��'j A' , Y I ' _.I.._ Wr -, W � . I �� _ � �"y' . F �. " � 2 t � . , f mse.r.�a lx � a � -1 . � _ �� " , � ,- .. � __ �' r a.. .. ¢ e v� ¢ 'Y�R ,y, RNER E06E N'FY � I � r �� r ' � " t . —�-- � .X�r�irKn�i.e a`,r+w1e.,v n t„� . �� ! �'. a_.<i� t i� s . i- _ g,y r. t ..1 . ,.rt '�_..,.: n-..)- .., K; - a� ` . Y.G♦ � . . i _. ' I i .,..»i . 1Oi SSAOftnEX !� r� a rn a � o� H� SEC.13 2 O �cnr aI P.�da e�Y ��'n � � .. ... ._.... .. ._ __. .. . . . . �.. . .. I VFZ. ^-TY" .F:.S^'r'.�r!'��,'q� I NW OF EA �C � �; ,e i r f 9 _ a �� J i � s -- , ,�- _ . � -: U _ a i 3 4 � 2 '�; Q : � �� '/TY I � — ' `--'� �—___� � ��""-t r------'--�.LL... � t '. � S t � � � � ,..,_ % � ♦ . $ 3 E: � X .._ ' /' •`�'Y� , • r. , _� ,,� , . �___�„-.� ' , � so ri '_ ._ -a 3 ' � . ,-'_ �.. - e . . -,- s �- � .., � ' .: . . - F. 5 . _ ' F ' ..... . � � . 6 t � - , .� 41 . �I Y.i �. � j � `_ Il , m . .... 1 r ... Z ' - 9 Z �'/ � W . �Y � -..� � �� " � � .�� I �� ._. W . �, . .. . F. iJ � , , - _ _ � � � `... .w . Ya , � - z � �� ,�;z ,a ,- - - z - _ � . _ � . .. NI- ' .. f. . _ _ .. n � V1 : 1- s � . : N � - � fn � t :- � �V �. N ` � F ' N .. � 397H Av NUE N E .' —"�'`� z ,2a;= .9 ; ; .:� 1 _ � , � AVE _�.; u� ;:, AJE: � l��►,� 9 � 1 ` F� � � , �_� Q i _. a.`e i 'a. �!. _. N —_ Q e_ _ , _ ; . . r � - N � V{ . \ . - ' �.. -(- 1- i / � .n S _' N' � f.. M .S a �w � t L� p . 1[) �1 1p . ` '� ' '.l7. _ . .' � � 59 TH : - . ' � N '_ � . ,Z � . . ',. �% ,' � I t ��' v 3. _ ; � i� � rr' � .. - _ - "_ .�., o s' ... . ,53TH � ^� AV NUE � ,-. N E �'�'U i " . '. a `.�� .z5-' ,6 = � � � � z� ' �k N � _ ( ,z' �'� ,'� I�,� �_ . � ,;� . A�i_.) e� ��` � J I - • ,/• . - _ ,v _ . ( ��—___l� � ' '.S7TH �.�, i�ACE J � � � � ,— i�9�j.'� — _ . , '�j8... � � ' c:� � 6 � � � _ , . W/H COMYrP . � . _ � . .. � ' .. StG 13 '_ . . . . 1�57�'�H A�_U[ � N� ¢ �—. ! �'_' q--i �----7f __"7 f_"l(�I �� "�-� �' �'�p � �'�" • � � C� % OF FR/OL EY � 1 (t3% . . N /N (o.Gi.ife � • G 'C l'�c J _..... ,r 5, " �:;-'-� _'�.. . _i .. .�.. ,�� .- . . . i i , . 16 17' �IB �� 19 20-` -�� T'�[ . � � � , i �_ ,` . .- �, :� -- - 0 . � -:� ,_ � �,, pt�.� .:�; . �� \ l� . e � �EO . -., ' ' � ' �g�S�F' .� Np'' I . a y c . t g4'Y � G.Q A�� e � _/_ ra 6 a % ro � . �il,... 2.: / ✓.xll �.... _'° ' . � .��G� � .. i Z .�� C-- � • - - 4 C o ::, V cr� e� F;.s � �. . . - : r..... .: . ---..?o. 3� 1�Nis i5 A c( �nrr �� ,.,F,� .:, � � ��,�,��,.,r,-� � oHISVYf 1.( Y�_ L {LVI NI [ I V( F{' � c ( iY 6 I.J! F! � -.�� 1 � dCfUlf( I I f 1: r ' _. . ♦.i - _ ....._________ Ja3/.J � NClfcM1CF rouarr;c. � Runo - � _ ir l "` ;' . -�H� -- ._.. __._._. —_. ' ni f'.,,- ` / �� V � r, �� .. 'J lT� ��E� �� I /`\�/,.. - � G ��'IlfGE , ; � ':. f/ .. -+ �� 'f `�'�O 4 � �"�-�_ - �Q- � `:`�. r �� ., � -� -- -. . -,. - � . 5 �� y - - '�,c 40 � 4E � ' _, ' j ` R -' . � , �- 4 . n, �� 4 � i � DENNIS I r �, Y 6 w � . = w.� S F f.. i� . = c ��-: 3 z _. w �� p< -; � '� '�'\ a ADDIT/OI4 � - '� x° ,� t �° .,� _ ' � , ' 1 ' , ,', , ` _ � � a.. �_-' 65TH 0.VE M E �` Z. ,� K y . EE � �4'G� � � �c .� \pe- w, 14 ,_ � Ri�E ENTpRy , I � q „ < ' EM pL J � 0 r . 4y .�is . " >, �° i t;E�sG� : {�' : .. i '�ilT� _ hi�p %� � a o ... _ . ......r�` <..�... �..5 : ti �GO`S c T WN'' ,� � z , ¢ " -- � � I �T' -��' �'�' +__ I ,. . - ' . ,_,� � - �` .., Q �- c� � I n,..� , ��^_p_ •II (v 13 .Zn-- O . � i i: --ADO. � .:rs w � < _ �a`. �i 3 �is : }a:;�si. . `��_ ��= a>. �.�._.. , ^ . . , . ,.. � ... .,.,.` : � .. .; . �t-._.,-,..; �•'�� :. ,- � -... - . _... ... ._ _..v..�...._ ," . �. ^ ' llvJ ; � � .. � (�: T � v iio) C cL. .. - .3 c.;., ii� 7: i..,:: ;::,..,,� � 't ry�d � i-',. ' __'..__-z. J ��.. � «. e^--�- 'II �` y ^- 4�XE-�-�� P 3 �[' /YtT. : -- .c ? —". 66 I/7 AVC h —f_, �r ar �� _��p�' � .l f . _ _G, — -- 1.�� ,z� � J - � �, � � % �� - �°��-� ``_ �s > �j Z � .. s G• 4� V) ' J' O�F.°.0 q. � � ` a- i��.�.�'�N�N�:�I � RO[AND W.qNOFR50N cour+n� suan�or ..c-a :xwr.. .�...u�:. }^ , I I �.... _.'� � � � W//< COAHE!/ SEC 16 L — I ; _.- { - It � i � � '�/ a � . -. _i�.� �45TH. r-...,—t^�.i .. �.� �� F�� J�� i _- —,. --�7ff------k`%f ��--_•�--_NE— S H CCAaE9 s•c za �• L�TS PLA�fEO Ai"✓eAdtlCxGEwEN! UF ' BIOC[S 1\�N,ij, AU:MOVTX� � vZ �{ I� �� `� , � .} .Q jY) H} Z (.�` � F S 7 '' �- r (' .7 I � I, r :� '� :W I. h� 'N (,. � : .I: � � �.�',� � � �. �� CITY p, C/TY OF COLUri�': V/LLAGc 0� i '� �E;, SEC n.e. c.sf.ax riu.a , I�,i i d .�� I i . . I � � �+ . I5f� - � � u. !il i�. �1' , � `.��. l ! �! ��:1 ,. �,.e. — . a "--' --! � , I � � 1 4 �r t f , f � F I� �.' �I �� I' �n � n ' P ' . � ... �� v l' i H �F • . �i . .,. �� . ��0.�' $ �Y/�,.�� 4 . f� ` � C�.i _ :.: � �� '. tI�Q `t ,.- � c F � _. .� . � �. ''' .i ..�. - il .' � � ._ . 5 : J "„ F ti . �. . � � � _l _ � ��. �^,,+7r3f�li� ' � ... ,� t ' � �. V �^ � I �� " � ,�L.��'j��-t�l�i �� 4 ! C) - � 1.i ��f � / `�P1. ' _`„ . � �. ��{��U�� '� .� . .., �. � y`iG;a T$ ,,. . II I ., t�F. �: . I: .: . � _ _ .. - 145TH. - - � . AVE.. �� ( F �. I •�' 1 /� �� w� ' I' ' ' ' � RESOLUTION N0. - 1977 A RESOLUTIOPI CALLING A PUBLIC NEARING ON THE 1978 BUDGET AND ALSO CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON EXPE?lDITURES TO BE f4ADE FROM REVENUE SHARIflG FUNDS WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fridley in the month of August, 1977, , received from the City Manager a proposed budget of the City of Fridley for the year 1978, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council of the City of Fridiey to hold a public hearing on the proposed 1978 budget, and WHEREAS, in addition, the purpose of the public hearing is to discuss the purpose of revenue sharing funds to be budgeted in the year 1978. ' N041, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City.of Fridley that a public hearing be held before the City Council at the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on the 19th day of September, 1977, to consider this matter. The City Manager is authorized and directed to publish notice of such pub- lic hearing in the official newspa;�=•r in the form and substance of the notice attached hereto as "Exhibi; ::." PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1977. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell � 10 A CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLTC HEARING NOTICE "EXHIBIT A" Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, Septemoer 19, 1g77, for the Purpose of: Holding a public hearing on the 1978 City Qudget including amounts to be budgeted for reven�e sharing purposes. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter will be given an opportunity at the above time and place. CITY MANAGER Nasim Qureshi Publish: August 24; August 31, and September 7, 1977 MEi�O T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY t4ANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. 6RUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR/FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESS�dENT ROLL -- WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND • STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 121 DATE: AUGUST 9, 1977 The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the finaT assessment roll and the publication of the hearing notice for the Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer Improvement Project ido. 121. The work has been completed. The improvement covers the areas outlined in the attached Notice of Hearing. MCB/eh 11 RESOLUTION N0. 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WATER, SEWER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 121 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named im- provement, to-wit: WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEME�dT PROJECT N0. 121 including all incidental expenses thereto is estimated at $ 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by sa�d impr•ovement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _ DAY OF 1977. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell , �� P4AYOR - WILLIAM J. P�EE 11 A � I� � � � � � I � � � � � r � RESOLUTION N0. 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATTON Of HEARIN6 ON PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORP4 SEtdER I14PROVEfdENT PROJECT N0. 121 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on August 15, 1977 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the following improvements including water, sanitary sewer, mains and laterals and service connections, storm sewer and drainage facilities and related appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota on the 19th day of September , 1977, at 7:30 P.t4. to pass upon the proposed assessment for WATER, SANITARY SEIJER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEtdENT PROJECT N0..121 . 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of ineeting in the official newspapaer of the City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Mardin C. Brunsell 1977. MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE 12 � . - CITY OF FRIDLEY IZ � ANOKA COUNTY, P�INNGSOTA � � r � NOTICE Of HEARING OF ASSESSMEfdT FOR WAT[R; SANITARY SEWEP„ AN� STORM SEWER IMPROVEP4ENT PROJECT N0. 121 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 19th day of September , 1977, at 7;30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvement, to-wit: WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STOftM SEWER II�PROVEf1ENT PROJECT N0. 121 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of water, sanitary sewer, mains and laterals and service connections, storm sewer and drainage facilities and related appurtenances, to serve the following properties: Deleier Addition � Marxen Terrace and Marxen Terrace 2nd Lot 31, Auditor's Sub. #129 Lots 4 and 5, Auditor's Sub. #108 � � � The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is a17 that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. . A property owner may appeal an assessm2nt to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days afier adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten {10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1977, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: MAYOR - WILLIAf4 J. NEE CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell � Publish: Fridley Sun on August 31 and September 7, 1977 � MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY f4ANA6ER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR/FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMEP�T P.OLLS -- ST 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVE��IEIJT PROJECT� DATE: AUGUST 9, 1977 The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the final assessment roll and the publication of the hearing notice for the ST 1977-1 and ST 1977-2 Street Improvement Projects. The work has been completed. ihe improvement covers the areas outlined in the attached Notice of Hearing. MCB/eh � . 13 �� r � i I ' � �, RESOLUFIOfd N0. 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARA7ION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEME��T PROJECTS BE IT RESOLUED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: ST. 1977-1 AND 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS including all incidental expenses thereto is estimated at $ 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AIdD ADOPTED BY TNE CITY COUNCIL QF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY Of �g��, ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR - WILLIAt4 J. NEE 13 l� ' i � � RESOLUTION N0. 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTIN6 PU3LICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED FI�dAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ST. 1977_1 qND S7, 1977_2 gTREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WIIERFAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on Auqust 15, 1977 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the following street iinprovements includin hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter,asto9m sewerlsystem,se, water and sanitary sewer services, and other facilities. WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and fi7ed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RCSOLUED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 19__ th __ day of _�temb�_� �g�� at �.30 P,M, to pass upon the proposed assessment for ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977_2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2. The Cit,y Clerk shail publish rotices of the time and place of ineeting in the official newspaper of the City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting, PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUfJCIL Of THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TNIS DAY OF ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell 1977. MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE 14 , , � ' � � � � � � . � �� ANOIUI COUNTY, MINN[SOTA NOTICE Of HEARING OF ASSESSt1ENT FOR ST. 7977-1 AN� ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEI4ENT PROJECTS Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 19th day of September ,�977, a� 7:30 o'clock P.tq„ to hear and pass upon ali objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvertients, to-wit: ST. 1977-T AND ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEFIENT PROJECTS The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The 9eneral nature of the inprovements and each of them is the construction of street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, and other facitities located as followr. ST. 1977-7 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Channel Road Lucia lane �ellwood Drive Vierce Street 63rd Avenue TH 65 E. Service Road Talmadge Lane Ironton Street Able Street Hickory Street 73', Avenue Mississippi Street to 68th Avenue Mississippi Street to 200` S. of 68th Place 63rd Avenue to Mississippi Street 63rd Avenue to Mississippi Street TH 65 E. Service Orive to Rice Creek Road 63rd Avenue to ?50' North Talmadge Nay to Osborne Way Huga Stre.et ta Ashton Avenue 73rd Avenue to Locke Park Parking Lot 18th Avenue to 79th Avenue Pine Tree Lane East to cul-de-sac ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEMEN7 PRO�ECT (MSAS) Ashton Avenue Ironton Street ta Ely Street Osborne Way East River Road to 75th Way Alden lJay �5th Way to Approx. 400' North 75th Way Talmadge Lane to Alden Way The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that 7and benefited by said improvements or each of them and ]ying within the general area above noted. Said improvements wil7 be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. � A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20j days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court �aithin ten (10) days after service upon tne Mayor or Clerk. , . DATED THIS DAY OF CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CI7Y OF FRIDLEY. ATTE57: 7977, BY ORDER OF THE YOR - WILLINd J, NEE � � C TY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell Publish: Fridley Sun on August 31 and September ], �g77 � . 14 A 1 1 I � � � `� MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FRQM; MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR/FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMEtvT ROLL -- ST. 1975-3 STREET � IMPROVEMEPJT PROJECT DATE: AUGUST 9, 1977 The attached resolutions would order the preparation bf the final assessment roll and the publication of the hearing notice for the St. i975-3 Street Improvement Project. The work has been completed. •The improverrent covers the areas outtined in the attached Notice of Hearing. MCB/eh 15 1 � � � ' � � ' � � _ RESOLUTION N0. 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTIf4G PREPARATIDN OF THE FINAL ASSESSME�JT ROLL FOR ST. 1975-3 STREET IMPROUEMENT PROJECT 6E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the followin9 named improvement, to-wit: ST. 1975-3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT including all incidental expenses thereto is estimated at $ 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel cf land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPI'ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY Of 1977. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. 6runsell MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE 15 A , Ii , � ' � � � ' � � RESOLUTION N0. 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING OiJ PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ST. 1975-3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on August 15, 1977 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the following street improvements incTuding grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, and other facilities. WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assess- ment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 19th day of September , 1977, at 7:30 P.M, to pass upon the proposed assessment for ST. 1975-3 STREET If•1PROVEMENT PROJECT 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of ineeting in the official newspaper of the City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. pASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF ATTEST: CTTY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell 1977. �4AYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE 16 , ' � , I■ CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR ST.'1975-3 STR[ET IMPROVEP1ENT PROJECT Notice is here6y given that the Council of the City of fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 19th day of September , 1977 at 7:30 o'clock P,M., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the pro- posed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: ST. 1975-3 STREET IMPROVEh1ENT PROJECT The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral o6jections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of � street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, and other facilities located as follows: ' East River Road -- Interstate �694 to 61st Way The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. , Said improvements wili be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. � �� A property owner may appea1 an assess�ent to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. ' DATED THIS DAY OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. � ' ATTEST: ' CITY CLERK - Marvin G. Brunse 1 1977, BY ORDER Of THE MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE Publish: Fridley Sun on August 31 and September 7, 1977 1 t 16 Fl Ii �1 I ' I , �4E�40 TD: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANA6ER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROP9: MARVIN BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CITY MGk./FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL -- 1977 SERVICE CONNECTIONS DATE: AUGUST 9, 1977 The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the final assessment roll and the publication of the hearing notice on the 1977 Service Connections. The work under this project has been completed, and covers the area outlined in the attached Notice of Nearing. , MCB: b1 � /lttach. ' , � ' ' � , 17 i� �� I , I , I � , 1 ' , ' , � ' ' ' , ' RESOLUTION N0. = 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTIf�G PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1977 SERVICE CONNECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: 1977 SERVICE CONP�ECTION RSSESSMENT ROLL for water and sewer mains, laterals, and service connections, including all incidental expenses thereto, is estimated at $ 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1977. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE 17 A , I� � � , � �J , ' . � , , , ' ' f RESOLUTION N0. - �977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PU[3LICATION OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1977 SERVICE CONNECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Plinnesota, on the T9th day of _ September , 1977, at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the following named improvement: 1977 SERVICE CONNECTIONS 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of ineeting in the official newspaper of the City, at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED.AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDIEY THIS OF ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell 1977. MAYOR - WILLIAM ,l. NEE : ' � CITY Of fRIDLEY 18 A ANOKA COUtJTY, h1ItJNESOTA , ' I , � ' ' ' ' ' � ' ' ' �I ' NOTICE OF HEARING OP� ASSESSt4ENT FOR WATER AND SEWER �4AIN5, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONN�CTIONS Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 19th day of September , 7977 at 7:30 o'clock P,M, to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the followin9 improvements, to-wit: 1911 WATER AND SEWER MAIPlS, LATERALS, AND SERUICE CONNECTIONS NOT HERETOFORE �URNISHED AfdD AVAILABLE The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing, the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction and furnishing of sewer mains, laterals, and service connections and water mains, laterals, and service connections in and to the properties, as follows: Parcel 1130 Parcel 1550 Parcel 1820, Lot 9 _ Lot 15 Lot 76, Parcel 2060 Lot 3, Parcel 690 W.165' of Lot 11 lying N'ly of 5.747' Lots 35 & 36, Block 6 Lots 37 & 38, Black 6 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 4 Pt of Lot 4 Lot 7, Block 1 Lots 22-25, Block K Lots 18 & 19, B1ock P Lot 2, Block l. Lot 3, Block 1 Lots 3& 4, Block 1 Auditor's Sub. #25 Auditor's Sub. N77 Auditor's Sub, N77 Auditor's Sub. q77 Auditor's Sub. A77 Auditor's Sub. pII9 Auditor's Sub. #729 Fridley Park Fridley Park Gallagher's Addition Herwal Rice Creek Terrace Auditor's Sub, q25 (Hillwind lst Add) Real Estate 70 Addition Riverview Heights Riverview Heights Spring Brook Park 2nd Target Addition Marion Terrace The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is ali that land benefited by said improven�ents or exh of them and is the same as those listed above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. DATED THIS DAY OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: TY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsel 1977, BY OROER OF THE YOR - WILLIAM J. NEE Publish: Fridley Sun on August 31 and September 7, 1977 19 MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUP�CIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUIdSELI, ASST. CITY �4GR./FIN. DIR. SU6JECT: ASSESSMENT ROLL -- TREATMENT ANU REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) DATE: August 8, 1977 The attached resolutions are for the purpose of ordering preparation of the assessment roll, and the publication of the notice of hearing for 7reatment and Removal of Trees (1977). The roll includes work done in the latter part of 1976 and the work done in 1977. i :.� ,� , �� ,. ,.' � , RESOLUTIO� N0. - 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSPIENT ROLL FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) 6E IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: TREAT�9ENT AP�D REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) including all incidental expenses thereto, is estimated at 2. The City Clerk sha11 forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to Ta4�. PASSED AND ADOPTED 6Y 7HE CITY COUP�CIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1977. ATTEST: CITY CLER - Marvin C. Brunsell h9AY0R - WILLIAM J. NEE 19 A RESOLUT?ON N0. - 1977 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBI_ICATION OF H[ARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE TREATNiENT AND REMOVAL Of TREES (1977) � BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, P1innesota, as follows: ' 1. The City Council shall n�eet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota on the 19th day of September _, 1977, at , 7:30 p.m. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the followin9 named improvement: .� TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and ' place of ineeting in the official newspaper of the City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. ,::, ' PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _ DAY OF , 1977. ' ' MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE '� AT7'EST: ' - CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell ' , ' ' ,, . ,' - 20 � �'' � I ��' 1 20 A �°,'' ' ' ' '' CITY Of FRIDLEY ANOKA CUUNTY, D1IiliJESOTA NOTICE OF NEFlRING OF ASSESSt�IEPrT FOR TREIITMENT APJD RE�40VAL OF TRE�S (1977). Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will rozet at the City Hall in said City on the 19th day of September, 1477 at 7:30 o'clock P.td., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improve;nent, to-wit: TREATMENT APIU P,E�40VAL OF TREES (1977} - The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office ef the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the ireatment or removaT of trees located in the City of Friciley. !at 4 & 4B, Parcel 305 Lo€ 5, Biock 8 Lot' 3, Block 3 Lot 20, Block I Lot 10, Rlock 2 Lot 3, Block 7 Lot 12, 81ock 2 Lot 1, Block 2 Loi 6, Block 4 Part Lot 17 E 18, Block 2 Lot l, B7ock 2 Lot 31, Block 1 Lot 18, Block 4 Lot 2, Block 4 Lot 3, Block 4 Lot 3, Block 8 Lot 9, Block 13 Lots 20 & 21, Block 16 Lots 22 - 24, Block 16 Part Lot 25 & 26, Block 16 Lot 4, Btock 3 Tract B Tract A Lots 3& 4, Black U Parcel 600 Parcel 650 Lot 18, Qlock 2 • Lot 19, Block 2 Lot 20, Block 2 Lot 21, Block 2 Lot 22, Block 2 Lots 17 - 21, Block 8 Lot 3, 61ock 1 Lot 9, Block l Auditor's Sub. k21 City View Harris Lake Estates Innsbruck 5th Innsbruck 5th Innsbruck P�orth Innsbruck North lst Innsbruck North 2nd Me7ody hianor 3rd Moore Lake Highlands Ostman's lst Ostman's 3rd Ostman's 3rd Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd Rearson's C�-aigway Estates 2nd Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd Plymouth Plymouth Plymouth Plymouth Rearrangement of Block 13-15 Plymouth Registered Land Survey �6 Registered Land Survey #19 Riverview Heights Riverwood Manor Riverwood hianor Sandhurst Sandhurst Sandhurst Sandhurst Sandhurst Spring Brook Park Spring Lake Park Lakeside 5pring Lake Park Lakeside I , I , Fage 2-- F�OTICE OF HEARING OF TREATMEWT AND REh10VAL OF TREES (1977) Lot 11, Block 1 Lot 20; Block 2 Lot 12, Block 1 Sylv�n Hills Plat 2 Sylvan Hills Plat 3 Upland lst The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and is the same as those 15sted above. Said improvements will be assessed agai�st the properties within the above notice areas. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the c�istrict court by serving notice ' of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adeption c` 'the assessment and filing such notice witn the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the hlayor or Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY T�fE CITY COU�sCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TH1S DAY OF ' '� , ATTEST: ' , ' CITY CLERK - htarvin C. 6runsell 1977. �RAYOR - WILLIAP4 J. NEE Please publish in the Fridley Sun on August 31st and September 7th, 1977. ' � ' . 2Q 13 MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR/FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: RESOLUTFON AUTHORIZING AtJD DIR[CTING THE SPLITTING OF S°ECIAL ASSESShiENTS ON LOTS 5-7, BLOCK l, ONA4JAY DATE: AUGUST 5, 1977 The above lots have been carried as one parcel. They have now been recorded as ttvo parcels at Anoka County and the City Council has approved this division. We are requesting that the special assessments be split. MCB/eh 2I � I ' � , ' RESOLUTTO�� N0. 1977 A RESOLUTIOiJ AUTNORIZIt�G AND DIRECTIN6 THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOTS 5-7, f4LOCK 1, OiJAWAY, AND APPORTIO�lING INTO LOTS 5,6, AND N.35' OF LOT,7, BLOCK 1 AND P1.5' OF LOT 7, BLOCK 1 ONAWAY WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOI,I, THEREFORE, BE IT RESQLVED as follows: 'That the assessments levied against the following described parcel, to-wit: Lots 5-7, Block 1, Onaway, may and shall be apportioned and divided as follows: ORIGINAL PARCEL Lats 5-7, Block 1, Onaway NEW PARCELS Lots 5,6 & N.35' of 7, Block 1, Onaway 5,5' of Lot 7, Block 1, Onaway FUND Reg SA W #34 SW #93 St 1970-4 SS #102 St 1973-1 St 1973-2 Re SS#1Q2 St 1974-1 Reg SA W #34 SW #93 St 1970-4 SS #1102 St 1973-1 St 1973-2 Re SS#102 St 1974-1 Reg SA W #34 SW #93 St 1970-4 SS #102 St 1973-1 St 1973-2 Re SS#102 St 1974-1 AQOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of FRIDLEY THIS OF ATTEST: 1977. CITY CLERK - Marvin C. arunsell ORIGI(dlll AMOUNT Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 14II.80 84.24 825.50 i,058.64 Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 142.60 50.70 791.20 Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid 6.20 3.54 34.40 1,058.64 MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE DAY 21A � � � � ' MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY t4A�JAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUWSELI, ASST. CITY t4GR/FIN. DIR. ' . SUBJECT: RE50LUTIONS AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMaINIIJG OF SPECIAL ASSESSMEtdTS OiJ LOTS 28-30, BLOCK 4, HYDE PARK ANO LOTS 37-40, BLOCK 12, SPRING aR00K PARK , DATE: AUGUST 5, 1977 ' , The Resolutions combining special assessments on the August 15th Agenda have been requested by Anoka County. Council approval of ' the combination of special assessments is required. ' The attached resolutions will accomplish this. ' MCB/eh � . , ' ' ' ' � � 22 � 'RESOLUTION N0. 1977 A RESOLUTION AUTHQRIZING AND DIRECTIiVG THE COM6ItiING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 28, BLOCK 4 AND LOTS 29 AN� 30, BLOCK 4, HYD[ P�RK � WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been combined. � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLUED as follows: 'That the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: Lot 2II, Qlock 4 and Lots 29 and 30, Block 4, Hyde Park, may and shall he combined as folTows: �i 'ORIGINAL PARCELS FUND ORIGINAL AMOUNT Lot 28, alock 4, Hyde Park Reg SA Paid 'Lots 29 and 30, Block 4 ;�{yde Park ' �NEW PARCEL APPROVEd Lots 28-30, Block 4 kyde Park � S5 #5A St 1971-4 St 1971-4 St 1971-4 Reg SA St 1968-2 SS f{5A St 1971-4 St 1971-4 Si 1971-4 Reg SA St 1968-2 SS #5A St 1971-4 St 1971-4 St 1971-4 $ 136.28 500.00 100.00 22II.00 Paid Paid 269.50 987.50 647.50 1,020.30 3,889.08 Paid Paid $ 405.78 1,487.50 747.50 1,248.30 3,884.08 ' ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF fRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1977. ' IMAYOR - WILLIAM J. �JEE ATTEST , � , � CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell 22 n i'� I � RESOLUTIOM N0. 1477 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTIN6 THE COMDINING OF SPECIAL 11SSESSMENTS ON LOTS 37, 38, 39, and 40, aLOCK 12, SPRING BROOK PARK WNEREAS, certain special assessments have been leviad with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been combined. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as foilows: 7hat the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: tots 37, 38, 39 and 40, Block 12, 5pring Brook Park, may and shall be combined ds follows: ORIGINAL PARCELS lots 37-40, Block Spring Brook Park Lot 37, Block 12 Lot 38, Block 12 i Lot 39, Block 12 Lot 40, Block 12 FUP�� 12 Reg SA SW #13 (each 54.99) SW #21 (each 354.58) SS #87 (each 144.29) St 1968-1A St 1968-1A St 1968-1A St 1968-1A ' NEW PARCEL APPROVED Lots 37-4�, Block 12 Spring Brook Park � I � � ' Reg SA SW #13 SW ;�21 SS #L�7 St 7968-1A St 1968-1A ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS ,iltl ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell 1977. MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE ORIGINAL A��10UNT Paid $ 219.96 1,418.32 577.16 604.26 355.70 380.70 380.70 3,936.80 Paid $ 219.96 1,418.32 �77.16 1,0�4.96 G?6.40 3,936.80 �: 23 � - � ' MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN 6RUNSELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FIPJANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS SPLITTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPORTIONING IPJTO THREE NEW AQDITIOfdS--TARGET, HEATHER HILLS 3RD, AND NORTON AUENUE HdMESITES, AND RESQLUTION SPLITTING SPECIAL ON PARCELS 2400 AND 2401, SECTION 11 . DATE: AUGUST 10, 1477 The City Council has previously approved the plats of Target Addition, Heather Hills 3rd Addition, and Norton Avenue Homesites, and these plats have been recorded at Anoka Count�. We are now request�ing that the special assessments be split for the rew plats. � The City Council has previously approvad the lot split on Parcels 2400 and 2401, Section 11, and this lot split has been recorded at Anoka � County. We are now requesting that the special assessments on these � two parcels be split. MCB ps � ' ' 2f� ir I � RESOLUTIOP� N0. - 1977 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSP7ENTS ON LOT 10, BLOCK 1, HEATNER HILLS SECOPlD !?DDITION, AND PART OF LOT 23, PARCEL 2800, AUDITOR'S SU[3DIVISION N0. 22, AND APPORTIONING INTO IiEATHER HILLS THIRU ADDITION WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been ]evied �aith respect to cerY.ain land and said tand has subsequently been subdivided, and replatted. NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED as foliows: :� That the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: Lot 10, Block l, Heather Hills Second Addition, and part of Lot 23, Parcel 2800, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, may and shall be apportioned and divided and � � replatted as follows: ORIGINAL PARCELS FUND ORIGINAL AMOUNT � Lot 10, Block 1, Heather Hills Second Regular SA Paid Addition � � � � , � Part of Lot 23, Parcel 2800, Auditor's Regular SA Subdivision No. 22 SS #114 PLATTING OF PARCELS APPROVED Lot l, Block 1, Heather Hills Th�rd Addition Lot 2, Block 1, Heather Nills Third Addition Lot 1, Block 2, Heather Hills Third Addition Lot 2, Block 2, Heather Hi11s Third Addition Lot 3, Block 2, Heather Hills Third Addition Lot 4, Block 2, Heather Hills Third Addition Lot 5, Block 2, Heather Hills Third Addition Lot 6, Block 2, Heather Hills Third Addition FUND Regular SA SS #,11�} Regular SA SS #114 Regular SA SS #114 Regular SR SS #114 Regular SA Regular SA Regular SA Regular SA Paid $ �42.66 $ 942.66 ORIGINAL AMOUNT Paid $ ]25.55 Paid $ 254.90 Paid $ 387.70 Paid $ 174.51 Paid Paid Paid Paid 942.66 24 A ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUIJCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY 7HTS DAY OF , 1977. ATTEST; MAYOR William J. Nee � tITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell I , I , � � � � �� RESQLUTION 6l0. - 1977 A RESOLUTION AUTNORIZIPlG AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PART Of LOT 11, Pf�RCEI 2210, AND FART OF LOT 12, PARCEL 2400, AUDITOR'S SU6- DIYISION N0. 155, AND APPORTIO(VIN6 :NTO TARGET AQDITION WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided and replatted. NOW, THERE, 6E IT RESOLVED as follov�s: That the assessments levied against the folloeving described parcels, to-wit: part of Lot 11, Parcel 2210, and Part of Lot 12, Parcei 2400, Auditor's Subdivision No. 155, may and shall be apportioned and divided and replatted as follows: ORI6INAL PARCELS FUND ORIGINAL FMOUfJT Part of Lot 11, Parcel 2210, Regular 5A Paid Auditor's Subdivision No. 155 W#34-0 Paid SS #82 $ 4,158.00 Part of Lot 12, Parcel 2400, Auditor's. Subdivision No. 155 PLATTING OF PARCELS APPROVED Lot 1, Block 1, Targ2t Addition Lot 2, Block 1, Target Addition Lot 3, Block 1, Target Addition Regular 5a SS #82 FUP7D Regular 5A SS #82 Regular SA S5 #82 Regular SA W #'34-0 SS #82 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 1977. � � ATTEST: � CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsel � � Paid $ 544.54 4,702.54 ORIGINAL P.MOUNT Pa;d — $ 544.54 Paid $ 890.55 Paid Paid $ 3,267.45 4,702.54 DAY OF MAYOR William J. Nee 2� 1 � �j � RESOLUTION N0, _ _ 1977 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMEPJTS OPJ PART OF LOT 13, PARCEL 1140, AUDITOR'S SUQDIVISION N0. 89, AN� APPORTIONING INTO NORTQN AVENUE HOMESITES WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided, and replatted. NOId, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the assessments levied against the following described parcel, to-wit: part of Lot 13, Parcel 1140, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, may and shall be apportioned and divided and replatted as follows: ORIGINAL PARCEL Part of Lot 13, Parcel 1140, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 PLATTING OF PARCELS qPPROVED � Lot 1, Block 1, Norton Avenue Homesites � r � � � � Lot 2, B1ock 1, Norton Avenue Homesites Lot 3, BToCk 1, Norton Avenue Homesites Lot 4, Block ), Norton Avenue Homesites FUND Regular SA W #34 SS k24 SW �88 (Water Lat.) SW �88 (Sewer Lat.} SS #89 ST. 1968-16 FUND Regular SA W #34 SS #24 S� #88 (Wat. Lat.) SW #88 (Sewer Lat.) SS �{89 ST. 1968-18 Regular SA W #34 SS #24 SV! #88 (Wat. Lat.) SW �88 (Sewer Lat.) SS 1i89 ST. 1968-16 Regular SA W N34 SS #24 SW #88 (lJat. Lat. ) SW #88 (Sewer Lat.) SS #84 ST. 1968-16 Regular SA W #34 SS �24 SW #88 (Wat. Lat.) SW #88 (Sewer Lat..) SS #89 ST. 1468_7g ORIGINAI AP1dUNT Paid Paid $ 515.70 3,196.08 7,207.14 631.89 3,795.25 15,346.06 ORIGINAL AMOUNT Paid Paid $ y0.25 505.60 7,184.00 110.59 639.20 Paid Paid $ 85.0� 596.32 1,257.77 104.26 631.21 Paid Paid $ 85.09 499.28 1,169.20 104.26 631.21 Paid Paid � 85.09 596.32 7,257.77 104.26 631.21 26 Page 2 Resolution No. - 1977 PLATTING OF PARCELS APPROVED Lot 5, alock 1, Norton Avenue Homesites Lot 6, Block 1, Norton Avenue Homesites FUND Regular SA W �i34 SS q24 SW N88 (Wat. Lat.) SW li88 {Sewer Lat.) SS #89 ST. 1968-1B Regular SA W #34 SS �{24 SdJ #88 (6Jater Lat. ) SW #88 (Sewer Lat.) SS �89 ST. 1968-16 ADOPTED BY ?HE CITY COUNCII OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS . 1977. ' ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunse}1 ORIGINAL Af40UNT Paid Paid $ 85.09 499.28 1,169.20 104.26 631.21 Paid Paid $ 85.04 499.28 1,169.20 104.26 631.21 15,346.06 DAY OF MAYOR William J. Nee 26 � ir � �I RESOLUTION N0. - 1977 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTIPJG OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCELS 2400 AND 2401, SECTION 11, AiJD APPORTIOPIING INTO PARCEL 2402 AND NEW PARCEL 2400, SECTION 11 WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided and combined, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLNED as follows: That the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: Parcels 2400 and 2401, Section 11, may and shall be apportioned and divided as fol 1 o+�rs : ORIGINAL PARCEL Parcel 2400, Section 11 Parce1 2401, Sectfon 11 � (Exempt Property--North Suburban Hospital District) � NEW PARCELS APPROVED Parcel 2400, Section 11 (Exempt Property--North Suburban Nospital District) Parcel 2402, Section 11 FUND Regular SA SW #24 W #34 . ST. 1962-2 SS #24 SI! #48-A (Sewer lat. ) SW #48-A (Water Lat.) SS N53 ST. 1965-1 Regu7ar SA SW q24 W �34 SS #24 SW #48-A (Sewer Lat.) Sl•! �48-A (Water Lat. ) SS #53 FUND Regular SA W #34 ST. 1962-2 ST. 1965-1 SW �/24 SS #24 5W #48-A (Sewer Lat.) St�J �48-A (Water Lat. ) SS N53 Regular SA W #34 SW p24 SS #124 SW #48-A (Sewer Lat.} SW #48-A (Water Lat.) SS #53 ORIGINAL AMOUNT Paid $ 1,644.75 Paid Paid 8,406.52 12,854.37 4,924.55 720.02 Paid Paid $ 639.63 Paid 3,269.20 4,457.64 1,259.61 1,482.78 39,659.07 ORIGINAL AMOUNT Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 1,758.97 8,990.30 13>284.17 5,046.00 962.26 Paid Paid $ 525.41 $ 2,685.42 4,027.84 1,138.16 1,240.54 39,659.07 2� PAGE 2, RESOLUTION N0. - �977 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS , 1977. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell i DAY OF MAYOR William J. P1ee 27 A � 28 � � APPOINTM[PJT FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AND APPROVAL - AUGUST 15, 1977 , STARTING EFFECTIVE NAME POSITION SALARY DATE REPLAC[5 � Brook Thomas Schaub Police Officer $945/Mo. August 29, Richard Huss 389 S. V4arwich Street �g77 St. Paul, Mn. 55105 ' � ' � , � ' � ' I 1 I -1 �� , � 1 . LICE"IScS Tb QE Af�PROVED 3Y THE CITY COUtICiL Il7 TNEIR REGULAR MEETIN� OP� AUrUST 15, 1977. Type of License �:_ Approved 6y: 29 Em lo ee Liquor Dispensing �ustine R. Gallagher Shorewood Inn James P. Hii] $ 5.00 1Ob80 93rd Ave. No. Public Safety Director t�taple Grove, t4n. 55369 Jeanne A. Parsons 1545 Pierce Terrace N.E. Ninneapolis, t1n. Shorewood Inn Mitzi H. Walters Shorewood Inn 1345 lOth St. N.4l., Apt. 203 New Brighton, tdn. 55T12 Roberta L. Winterburn 2315 Groberg St., Apt, 2 New Brighton, Mn. 55112 � Shorewood Inn James P. Hill Public 5afety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 , � ,� LICliNSE,$ TO IIE APYROVED BY THli CITY COUNCIL AT TBEIR RliGULAR f1EliTING OCd AUGUST 15� 1977 GF�S S�RVICliS APPROV�D BY 4 Seasons Sheet [�7etal Inc. 2964 Jersey Avenue North Plbg. & Htg, Insp. Crystal, t•1n. 55427 By: Ronald II. Buster WiZliam Sandin Home Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. 5211 Pden Road Mound, h1n. 55364 By: Thomas G Shandley J & J Heating Route 2 Monticello, Mn. 55362 GEP]ERAL CONTRACiOR A-Craft Construction Inc. 1055 - 93rd Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433 Custom Pools, Inc. 701 East Excelsior Avenue Hopkins, Mn. 55343 By: James & Jones By: Russell Scott By: Virgil Mulvaney Henning Nelson Construction Co. � � 3735 North Highway #52 � Robbinsdale, Mn. 55422 By: henning Nelson � , Lill-Son Builders Inc�. 8535 Central Avenue N.E. Blaine, Mn. 55432 By: Ronald L?lliencr.antz , � , � Western Remodelers 2529 Nicollet Avenue Minneapolis, Mn. 55404 By: 5. Goldman HEATING Home Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. 5211 Fden Road [�bund, Mn. 55364 By: Thomas G. Shandley J & J Heating � Route #2 Monticello, Mn. 55362 By; James & Jones MASONRY I.eROy C. Nystrom . � � 11857 Kentucky Averiue North Champlin, Mn. 55316 By: LeROy C. Nystrom ROOFING ABC Siding & Roofin9 4591 - 2� Street N.�, Fridley, t.in, 55921 By: ibnald ICapecky Plhg. & Htg. Insp. William Sandin Plbg. & Htg. Insp. William Sandin Community Dev. Adm. Darrel Clark Community Dev. Adm Darrel Clark Conm:unity Dev. Adn:. Darrel Clark Community Dev. Adm. Darrel Clark Conanunity Dev. Adm. Darrel Clark Plbg. & Htg. Insp. William Sandin Plbg. & Htg. Insp. William Sandin Community Dev. Adm. Darrel Clark Community Dev, pdm. Darrel Clark 29 Fl i ''� 29B t4l1LTIPLE D4tELLTNG LICEh75ES TO BE 11PPRGVE�: ' Period September l, 1977 to September 2, 1978 OWNER ADDRESS UNI7S FEE APPROVED BY: �John A. Swanson 5770 - 2nd St. NE 8 $20.00 R. D. Atdrich, 5835 Centra7 Ave. NE Fire Frev. Fridley, '9N 55432 " � Glen Barrott 5830 - 2nd St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 530 - 120th Lane N4f Fire Prev. � Coon Rapids, P1N Ragers Properties 5851 - 2nd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, �6512 - 50th Ave. No. Fire Prev. Mpls, MPJ 55428 Otto G. Tauer 5866 - 2nd St. P!E 4 15.00 R.D. Aldrich, �5866 - 2nd St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, MN 55432 �Douglas Properties, Inc. 5980 - 2nd St. P�E 4 15.00 R.D. Aldrich, 2505 Silver Ln. NE Fire Prev. Mpls, MPd 55421 �John L. & Lucille B. Calguire 6008 - 2nd.St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldr9ch, 2018 - 36th Ave. NE fire Prev. Mpls, Mfd 55418 ' Mary A. Si�ner 6511 - 2nd St. NE S 15.C�0 R. D. Aldrich, 4427 Monroe NE Fire Prev. , Columbia Heights, MN 55421 John S. Guzik 6061 - 2nd St. NE 4 i5.00 R. D. Aidrich, ,6067 - 2nd St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, MN 55432 IPaul �4. Johnson 6525 - 2nd St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, ,3925 Shamrock Dr. NE Fire Prev. Mpls, MN 55421 I, �Lynn D. Hansen 6530 - 2nd St. RE 4 15.00 R. G. Aldrich, 210 - 67th Ave. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, MN 55432 ''Darold & Ruth Johns�n 6541 - 2nd St. NE 5 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 4216 - 7th St. NE Fire Prev. �ipls, MN 55421 ' Jerry Guimont Apts. 6551 - 2nd St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 2187 Lakebrook Dr. Fire Prev. ' New Brighton, MN 55112 ' �. Page 1 � MUL7IPLE DWELLIMG LICENSES TO DE APPROVED: Period September 1,.1977 to September i, 1978 ,� OWNER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPRO'a��'D �+Y: �A1bin Johnson 5800 - 2'2 St. NE 4 $15.00 R. D. A1drich, R.R. 1, Qox 59 Fire Prev. • Cushing, WI 54006 'Albin Johnsan 5810 - 22 St. haE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. j�Dale H. @gland & 5846 - 2� St. NE 6 15.00 R. U. Aldrich, Roger M. Ruetten Fire Prev. 5108 Erighton Lane �New Brighton, P4tJ 55112 Floyd C. & Pearl P4. Bradley 5900 - 2; St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5861 4!. Moore Lake Dr. Fire Prev. � Fridley, MN 55432 John Ouellette 5901 - 22 3t. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, ,848 - 82nd Ave. NE Fire Prev. Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 ,Floyd C. & Pearl M. Bradley 5908 - 22 St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5861 W. Moore Lake Dr. fire Prev. Fridley, MN 55432 'FToyd C. & Pearl h!. Bradley 5916 - 22 St. NE 7 i5.00 R. G. Aldrich, same address as above fire Prev. �J. W. Lindho7m 5924 - 22 St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 2529 Parkview Blvd. Fire Prev. Mpls, MN 55422 � Dale Knott 5980 - 22 St. PJE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 3945 Reservior Blvd. Fire �rev. Mpls, MN 55421 ' Herbert A, & Lucinda M. Aaker 6060 - 22 St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5918 Abbott Ave. No. Fire Prev. .,Brooklyn Center, P1P� 55429 Mr. & Mrs. ArnoTd Elmquist 4901 - 3rd St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, �8140 Long Lake Road NE F i r e P r e v. Mp1s, MN 55432 Mr, b Mrs. ArnoTd Elmquist 4913 - 3rd St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, ' same address as above Fire Prev. Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Elmquist 4921 - 3rd St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, :� same address as above Fire Prev. i 1 Page 2 � 29 D MULTIPLE DtdELLING LICEtr'SES TO BE APPROVED: � � Period September 1, 1977 to September 1, 1978 ` OWNER ADDRESS UNITS FFE APPROVED 6Y: ., Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Elmquist 4935 - 3rd St. NE 7 $15.00 R. D. AldricH, 8140 Long Lake Rd. Fire Prev. ' Mpls, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Elmquist 4449 - 3rd St. NE 7 15.00 R. D. AldricF�, same address as above Fire Prev. � John D. P1iller 4965 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5015 NE University Ave. Fire Prev. ' Mpis, MN 55421 John D. Miller 4985 - 3rd St. tdE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, � same address as above Fire Prev. John D. Miller 5005 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. � W. W. Untinen Estate 5025 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, cio John D. Miller Fire Prev. , same address as above Bigos Properties 5200 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aidrich, '627 lst Ave. No. Fire Prev. Mpls, MN 554Q3 Bigos Properties 5201 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, � same address as above Fire Prev. Bigos Properties 5230 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, ' same address as above Fire Prev. Bigos Properties 5231 - 3rd St. NE 17 20.00 R. D. ATdrich, �same address as above Fire Prev. Bigos Properties 5260 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire.Prev. ' Bigos Properties 5261 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above fire Prev. , Bigos Properties 5290 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. , Bigos Properties 5291 - 3rd St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. 'Mervin L. Byrne 5955-65 - 3rd St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5955 - 3rd St. NE fire Prev. Fridley, MN 55432 ' , --= _:: -,.:� . Page 3 �. 29 E MULTIPLE DWELLING LICEPlSE5 TO 6E APPROVED: Period September 1, 1977 Eo September l, 1978 �� 04lNER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPP.OVED BY: �Richard C. Welk 5974 - 3rd St. fdE 4 $15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 4090 Decatur Ave. Fao. Fire Prev. New Nope, MN 55427 'David C. P�elson 5980 - 3rd St. N[ 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1763i Chameleon 5t. NW Fire Prev. Anoka, MN 55303 ' Roland & Pearl Waller E071 - 3rd it. P�E 3 15.00 R. 0. Aldrich, Richard & Cheryl Veth 290 - 61st Ave. tdE Fire Prev. '2547 W. Cactus Phoenix, AZ 'Duane L. Schwartz 5347-49 - 4th St. N� 3 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5347 - 4th St. NE Fire Prev. Fridley, MN 55421 '� John S. Partyka 5401 - 4th St. f�E 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 4757 - 2z St. NE Fire Prev. Mpls, MN 55421 , Theodore M. Trout 5419 - 4th St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5419 - 4th St. NE, Apt. 4 Fire Prev. ' Mp1s, MN 55421 Curtis Bostrorn 5400 - 5th St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5652 Regis Trail Fire Prev. � Fridley, MN 55432 Curtis Bostrom 5410 - 5th St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, , same address as above Fire Prev. Gerald Leroy P4iller 5420 - 5th St. NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5420 - 5th St. NE Fire Prev. �, fridley, MN 55421 Harold D. Morrow 5430 - 7th St. NE 34 42.00 R. D. Aldrich, 'Rt, 4, Box 28 Fire Prev. River Falls, WI 54022 �Kenfleth Franko 5612 - 7th St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 15780 - 125th Ave. N. Fire Prev. Anoka, MPd 55303 tKenneth Franko 5640 - 7th St. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. Page 4 ' ' � 29 F ° MULTIPLE DWELLI�VG LICEPJSES TO 6E P,PPROVED: �Period September 1, 1977 to September 1, 1978 OWNER ADDRE55 UNITS FEE APPROVED f3Y: ,James & Pat Lund 1050 - 52nd Ave. fdE 16 $24.00 R. D. Aldrich., 2417 - 148th Ave. NE Fire Prev. Anoka, MfJ 55303 � James & Pat Lund 1090 - 52nd Ave. IaE lfi 24.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. ' 3ames & Pat Lund 1120 - 52nd Ave. NE 16 24.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. 'James & Pat Lund 1170 - 52nd Ave. NE 16 24.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. ,Bigos Properties 215 - 53rd Ave. t�lE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 627 lst Ave. No. Fire Prev. Mpls, MPJ 55403 ' Bigos Properttes 305 - 53rd Ave. NE 7 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, s�me address as above Fire Prev. �Bette Lynn Hansen 251 - 57th Place PlE 7 15.00 R. �. Aidrich, 9716 Rich Road Fire Prev. Bloomington, P�N 55437 ' Otto G. Tauer 359 - 57th Place NE 8 20.00 R. 0. Aldrich, 5866 - 2nd St, t�E Fire Prev. ' Fridley, MN 55432 David W. Rust 262 - 57th Place NE 8 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5735 Quincy St. NE Fire Prev. � Mpls, MN 55432 James H. & P�ary E. Johnson 380 - 57th Place NE 4 15.OD R. D. Aldrich, '621 Bennett Dr. Fire Prev. Fridiey, MN 55432 'Dale H. Egland & 150 - 59� Way NE 12 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, Roger M. Ruetten Fire Prev. 5108 Brighton Lane New Brighton, MN 55112 ' Tropicana Company 190 - 59; Way P!E 12 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 6250 Wayzata Blvd. Fire Prev. �Mpls, MN 55416 Tropicana Company 191 - 592 Way NE 12 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, ' same address as above Fire Prev. ' �l Page 5 � � 29 G 1/ULTIPLE DrJELLIN6 LICENSES TO �E APPROVED: Period September 1, 1977 to September 1, 1978 � OWP�ER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROV[� BY: � Towne Properties 1441 - 73rd Ave. NC 18 $26.00 R. D. Rldrich, ` 5600 Matterhorn Dr. Fire Prev. t�pls, MN 55432 �Behun E� Petersott Realty Co. 351 - 74th Ave. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1607 Qunker Lake Blvd. NE Fire Prev. Anoka, tdN 55303 ' Behun & Peterson Realty Co. 389 - 74th Ave. �IE I1 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 1607 Bunker Lake alvd. NE Fire Prev. , Anoka, �•1PJ 55303 Behun & Peterson Realty Co. 415 - 74th Ave. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 'same address as a6ove Fire Prev. Kenneth G. & Jo Ann K. Larson 350 - 75th Ave. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 3232 Independence Ave. N. Fire Prev. ' New Hope, MN 55427 William C. & 450 - 75th ,4ve. P�E 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 'Robert L Hotmquist Fire Prev. 9608 Admiral Lane Mpls, MN fi5429 _ 'William C. & 476 - 75th Ave. NE 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, Robert L. Ho]mquist Fire Prev. same address as above ' Paul Burkholder 106 - 77th 1Jay NE 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 7860 Alden l�ay Fire Prev. ' Fridley, MN 55432 Jeffrey D. Mosiman 181 - 79th VVay NE 8 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 9242 Flanders St. NE Fire Prev. '• Mpls, MN .55434 M. A. Biddle 211 - 79th 4lay NE 8 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, �4800 Cedar Lake Rd. Fire Prev. Mpls, MN 55416 'Virginia T. Carlson 231 - 79th Way NE i 1.5,00 R. D. Aldrich, 231 - 79th Way NE, Apt. 5 Fire Prev. frid]ey, MN 55432 , Dennis R. Coverston 321 - 79th k'ay NE 8 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 104 Wood Ridge Dr. Fire Prev. White 6ear Lake, MN 55110 ' , , Page 6 29 H � MULTIPLE Dld[LLING LICENSES TO 6[ APPP.OVED: Period September 1, 1977 to September 1, 1978 � OWlVER ADDRESS __ UNITS FEE APPRO'dED �Y: �Donald C. Anderson 5960 Anna St. NE 33 $41.00 R. D. Aldrich, 3319 Belden Dr. NE Fire Prev. Mpls, t1N 55418 ' �SPGA Associates 6551 Channel Road 11 26.00 R. D. Aldrich, 909�farmers & hiechanics 6ank Fire Prev. hipls, MN 55402 1 SPGA Associates 6571 Channel Road 11 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. , Nathan Schwartz 101 Charles St. NE 12 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, 5916 Medicine Lk. Rd. Fire Prev. � Mpls, MN 55422 Nathan Schwartz 179 Charles St. NE 12 20.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as a6ove Fire Prev. ' Nathan Schwartz 180 Charles St. NE 12 20.00 R. D. Atdrich, same address as above Fire Prev. , Dr. Alexander A. Levitan 1200 Cheri�Lane NE 18 26.00 R. D. Aldrich, ?051 Long Lake Rd. Fire Prev. ' New Brighton, MN 55421 Dr. Alexander A. Levitan 1230 Cheri l.ane NE 18 26.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. 1 Dr. Alexander A. Levitan 1260 Cheri Lane NE 18 26.00 R. D. Aldrich, , same address as above Fire Prev. I , Dr. Alexander A. Levitan 1290 Cheri Lane NE 18 26.00 R. D. Aldrich, same address as above Fire Prev. , Ed & Mel's Enterprises 8024 Florida Ave. N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 ' River Road East Corp. P.Q. Box 270 � Mpls, MN 55440 John Ouellette 848 - 82nd Ave. NE , Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 I Paul Burkholder '7860 Alden lJay Fridley, MN 55432 I , � 5940 East River Rd. 6550 East River Rd. 6551 East River Rd. 7673 East River Rd. Page 7 12 20.00 140 148.00 n 20.00 4 15.00 R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, �ire Prev. „_-x - I � � � � � 29 I MULTIPLE �WELLIFJG LICENSES TO BE APPROVED: Period September 1, 1977 to September 1, 1978 OWNER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPROUFD 8Y: Five Sands Development Corp. 7805 East River Rd. 59 $67.00 R. �. Aldrich, c/o Hirsch New�nan Coinpany Fire Prev. II800 West HighH�ay 7 Mpls, MN 55426 Five Sands Development Corp. 7825 East R�iver Rd. 59 67.00 R. G. Aldrich, same address as above fire Prev. Five Sands Development Corp. 7845 East River Rd. Isame address as above Five Sands �evelopment Corp. 7875 East River Rd. 'same address as above Five Sands �evelopment Corp. 7895 East River Rd. same address as above 1 Leonard Dailey 8191 East River Rd. 8]97 East River Rd. IFridley, MN 55432 Norma.n E. Shuldheisz 634i Highway 65 tJE �1256 - 8th Lane Anoka, �1N 55303 Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Elmquist �8140 Long Lake Rd, hE Mp7s, MN 55432 �John A. Swanson 5535 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 �Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Elmquist 8140 Cong Lake Rd. NE Mpl s , h1N 55432 ' Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Elmquist same address as above � Bigos Properties 627 lst Ave. N. Mpls, MN 554D3 , Bigos Properties same address as above 1 ' ' 6370 Highway 65 NE 6379 Ni ghviay 65 NE 6393 Hi gfiway 65 NE 6417 Highway 65 NE 5100 Horizon Dr. NE 5101 Horizon Dr. NE Pa9e 8 59 67.00 59 67.00 59 67.�0 5 15.00 10 2Q.00 15 23.00 8. 20.00 7 15.00 8 20.00 5 15.00 7 15.Q0 R. D. Aldrich, ' Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, l Fire Prev. R. D. ,�idrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, � Fire Prev. R. D, P,ldrich, I F�re Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. 6. Aldrich, I fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. Aldr�ch, � Fire Prev. 29 J , MULTIPL[ �6dELLING LICENSLS TO QE APFRGVED: Period September 1, 1977 to September i, 1978 � OWNER ADDRESS UNITS FEE APPRUVF.D BY: �Innsbruck fJorth Associates 1601 N. Innsbruck Drive 258 $26G.00 R. D. Aldrich, 7286 No. 72nd Lane Fire Prev. Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 ,Stanley J. & Ann R. Kania . 430 Ironton St. P�E, Apt. 2 Fridley, ��N 55432 � � Milton & Ellen Hughes 4Q10 pouglas Ave. So. ' Mpls, MPd 55416 t4ilton & Ellen Hughes �same address as above Milton & Ellen Hughes same address as above ' Lynde Investment,Co. 9801 Oak Ridge Trail � Minnetonka h1N 55343 Lynde Investment Co. �same address as abeve Lynde Investment Co. same address as above ' Arno E. Rosin 74Q0 Lyric Lane, Apt. 2 'Fridley, MPI 55432 Duane Paul Tollefson 8690 Yan Buren ' Blaine, MN 55434 James H. Cross �6271 Jackson St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 'Chris Zelevarov 160 Mississippi P1., Apt. 1 Fridley, h1N 55432 'A. T. Gearman 6225 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 � ' I 430 Ironton St. NE 6670 Lueia Lane NE 6680 Lucia Lane NE 6690 Lucia Lane �E 910 Lynde Drive NE 950 Lynde Drive NE 990 Lynde Dr•ive NE 7400 Lyric Lane NE 4030 Main St. NE 140 Mississippi Place NE 160 Mississippi Place NE 5650 Po7k St. NE Page 9 3 15.00 16 • 24.00 16 24.00 16 24.00 11 20.00 71 70.00 11 20.00 a 2a. o0 4 15.00 4 15,00 4 15.00 32 40.00 R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. lildrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aidrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Pire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, � Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Atdrich, Fire Prev. R. D. Aldrich, I Fire Prev. 29 fC � MULTIPLE Ub�ELLIMG LICEt�S[S TO GE APPROVEQ: Period September 1, 1°77 to September Y, 1978 � OWPJER ADDRESS UN1TS F[F APPROUED f3Y: 'Gordon J. Aspenson 6489 Rivervievr Terrace 4 $15.00 R. D. Aldrich, 17 Rice Creek Way Fire Prev. Fridley, MN 55432 ',Donald E. P� Mary J. Keefe 201 Satellite Lane NE 11 20.00 R, b. Aldrich, 2425 Broo{:ridge Ave. fJo. Fire Prev. Golden Ualley, MN 55422 ' James Weils 221 Sa�ellite Lane NE 11 20.00 R. D. ATdrich, 15D5 Blanchard Court Fire Prev. ' Wheaton, IL Dennis R. Coverston 6111 Star Lane NE 18 26.00 R. D. Aldrich, '104 Wood Ridge Dr. Fire Prev. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 _' � ' ' ' � ' ' ' : � Page IO , .' . � . ..� � � 30 � � � � � 1 , 1 � � � � ■ CLAIMS No. 205J02 - 22299� � � Il 1 � 1 ESTIMATES FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - AUGUST 15, 1977 Weaver, Talle & Herrick 316 East Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 For Services Rendered as City Attorney for July, 1977 $2,102.35 Smith, Juster, Feikema, Chartered 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 For Services Rer,dered as Prosecutor for July, 1977 $1,765.G0 ) �. �qVI OPFIGES WEAVER, TALLE 6c.HERRIGK CHARLES R.WEAVER HF.{iMNN LTALLE VIRGIL 0. HERRIGR ROBfRT Ml1NN5 WILLIAM K.c000H�cH . AUgllSt lO� IJ77 DOUGlAS f. RLINT VCH City of Fridley July Retainer Council Meetings 11-3/4 hours Staff Meetings 3 hours Conference with Staff 10 hours Bjerhissett:Preparation and attendance at Unemployment Compensation Hearing 6 hours Citizens Inquiries 2 hours Memos, Ordinances, and Legal Research Lease re Islands of Peace 1 hour Guiclelines re Tax Forfeited Property 2 hour� Form Letter "Workmen's Compensation"Inquiries 1 hour Use of Surplus Funds- Bond Account 3 hours Satisfaction of Lis Pendens- Condemnation /f24837 3 hours �wnership of River Frontage- Sandhurst Addition 2 hours 46 hours Hours in excess of 30 @$40.00 per hour Fridley v. Erickson, District Court, 310 EAST MqIN Sl'REEI' ANOKA,MINNESOTA 5530J a21�5413 82J9 UNNF.RSITY AVfNUE N.C, fRIDLEY,MINNESOTA�55432 5l1-3B50 INVOICE N0. 2647 $1,300.00 640.00 Notice of riotion, Court Appearance 150.00 EXPENSES ADVt1NCED: County Recorder: 1.00 District Court: 2.50 59 xerox copies @$.15 per copy: g,85 TOTAL ...............$2,102.35 ;]. A ' ' � � TIME RECORD FOR JULY, 1977 PP.OSECUTIOW LdORK 1. Preparatiorr, Travel and Time in Court for 26 Court trials and 42 Pre•trial cor�ferences 2. Investigation and Process of Complaints including office conferences, phone con- ferences and correspondence. �3. Court and Police Administration. TOTAL STATEMENT SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA,CHARTERED ATTORNEYS AT LAW R50 BUILDERS EXCNANGE BL�G. MINNENPOLIS� MINNESOTA 35902 eaV-�1481 � 38 hours 3 hours 41 hours City of Fridley Fridley Municipal Building 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 L ttention: P4r. Nasim Qureshi CVN PLELSE RETVFH TXIS GORTIOH WITM YOUfl GAYMENT 15 minutes 25 minutes 40 minutes SUBIJRflAN pFpKES OSS E D FRIDLEY DATE � � � FORWARDED fROM LAST STATEMENT 8-02-77 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during July, 1977. July, 1977 Retainer. $1,300.00 Time in excess of 30 hours (11 hours 40 minutes} 465.00 I declare under penatties of law that this account, claim or demand is just and cor- rect and tha no zrt ot it haS n pai ' ig ure of laimant � SMITH.lUSTER, FEIKEMA,CHAPTEPEO ATTONNEY! 1T LAW ' I � . �.� �� W� � J • BALANCE $1,300.00 $1,765.00 31 �