Loading...
06/13/1977 - 00014484r j THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CiTY COUNCIL OF JUNE 13, 1977 The Public Hearinq of the Fridley City Council of June 13, 1977 was called to order at 7:40 p,m. by Mayor Nee. � ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Councilman Fitzpatrick, Mayor Nee, and Councilman Schneider Councilwoman Kukowsk7 (arr�ved at 8:D0 p.m.) Councilman Hamerm k Councilman Schneider requested an item be added under "New Business" for "Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning Property as Covered in the Request 6y Gary Peterson, Z�A �77-01." MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5chneider to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilman voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF LOCKE LAKE: Mayor Nee opened the �nformal public hearing at 7•43 p.m. regarding a proposal for the improvement of Locke Lake. Mr. Mike Petrangelo, Fridley's representative to the Rice Creek Watershed District, introduced other mem6ers of the Board who were present to discuss this proposal. Mr. Tom MacLennan, Engineer,and Mr. Frank Murray, Attorney, were also present representing the Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Petrangelo stated there would be discussion this evening which might be beneficial in helping to resolve the problem of Locke Lake. He stated the study regarding sedimentation of Locke Lake was submitted �o the City and the report will be reviewed with the citizens by the Watershed District's Engineer, Mr. Tom MacLennan. Mr. MacLennan then reviewed the report and indicated the Watershed �istrict would like comments either verbally or written from the residents. Mr. MacLennan stated Locke Lake was created in 1955 and since that time, sediment h�s been coming into the lake from lands helow Long Lake and includes properties in Ramsey and Anoka Counties and neighboring cities. A survey was taken of the bottom contours of the lake and by comparing historical data, it was estimated the original depth of the lake was approximately four feet in the north section and six feet in the south section. Four different types of erosion were noted� upland, stream bank, land development, and sediments discharged by the urban storm sewer system. Mr. MacLennan stated, on the average, what has come into the lake is about 880 cubic yards of sediment per year. Some possible solutions would be better conservation in the upland areas; prevent eresion as much as possible; and remove exlsting deposits and provide a trap for the sediment so that it can be taken out in a more economical manner. �Some of the alternatives which Mr. MacLennan discussed for improvement of the lake would be (1) to restore Locke Lake as it was in the beginning; (2) restore and construct an tnternal reservoir; and (3) restore Locke Lake and construct an external reservoir. Some of the recommendations covered in the report were: (1) to create a public awareness regarding soil erosion; (2) initiate soil conservation measures, (3) stabilization of the channel; and (4) restoration of Locke Lake. a� �� PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF �UNE 13, 1977 PAGE 2 Ms Sharon Bakke, President of the Locke Lake Association, thanked the Watershed District and the City for their investigation into the problems of Locke Lake. She stated one of the biggest problems is funding to clean up the lake, and questioned how funds could be provided. Mr. Frank Murray, Attorney for the Rice Creek Watershed District, indicated the law does pro�ide that either the City or a certain percentage of property owners can petition for a pro�ect. If a petition was received by the Rice Creek Watershed ' Board, a method of assessment would be determined, based on findings of persons benefited At this t�me, 8 p.m., Councilwoman Kukowski arrived at the meeting. Mr. Murray stated it was his thought this tyae of project is not part of a basic management program so you cannot assess beyond the area that is really benefited. He stated, if a petition is received, a public hearing would be necessary. He felt, if the residents wanted the lake cleaned, they will have to pay for it; and if they decided to proceed with the improvement, he assured them there would be a careful analysis of who pays for the improvement as far as the benefited property. Mayor Nee referred to the memo received from Mr. Murray, regarding Chapter 112, Subdivision 2 on lands that are contributing water, and qvestioned if the Rice Creek Watershed Dtstrict considers that as the basis for assessment. Mr. Plurray indicated he could not answer at this time on whether or not a factual basis could be found for an assessment. Ms Bakke stated one of the problems in the lake is the storm sewer runoff caused by the storm sewer in the City of Fridley She questioned members of the Rice Creek Watershed Board about any grants available. Mr Dimke, member of the Watershed Board, stated grants are available, but usually not to rectify a situation that will continue. The main stipulation in Federal ' grants is not to remedy a situation, but for something permanent. He stated the Federal government looks at the benefit to many, rather than a few, and demonstration for something that will be permanent and not remedial. Ms. Bakke asked what plan the Watershed Board would recommend for cleaning up Locke Lake. Mr. MacLennan, Engineer for the Watershed District, stated the option calling for excavating the lake would be the best one. Mr. Petrangelo, member of the Rice Creek Watershed District, asked why he was chosing this alternate. Mr. MacLennan replied because of the land acquisitton and it would be easier to put the sediment trap at the bottom of Locke Lake Ms. Bakke questioned how soon the pro�ect could begin, if funds were available. Mr. Petrangelo indicated that first a petition has to be received and a public hearing held to determine if the pro�ect should proceed. Dr. Ralph Erkel, 567 R�ce Creek Terrace, questioned how deep the lake is now Mr. MacLennan stated there are large areas where the deposits are above the existing water. He �ndicated the sediment drops primarily at the east end of Locke Lake so deposits ' are not very great on the west side. Mr. Jim Gilbertson, 6801 Channel Road N.E „ indicated about 15 inches of his land ends up in Locke Lake every year He felt there should be advice available for persons who w�sh to do somethin9 about the problem. Mr. MacLennan pointed out to Mr. Gilbertson the pro�ect done at the residence of Dr. Lapinski on Rice Creek Terrace. He stated this was a �oint venture with the Watershed District providing labor through CETA and Dr. Lapinski prov�ding the materials. He felt a request to get some type of a program would be well received by the Board of Managers for the Watershed District. Mr. Gilbertson asked if he was to do something to stabilize his bank, if a permit would be required. (: � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1977 PAGE 3 Mr. MacLennan stated he would need a permit from the Watershed District as well as the Department of Natural Resources, but felt he would find 6oth of them cooperative. Mr. Bakke questioned if they proceeded with the improvement, what would be done with the sedimentation that is removed from the lake. Mr. MacLennan stated it would have to be removed and disposed of, Ms. 6akke questioned 'if the sediment could 6e sold and used as part of the payment for the improvement pro�ect. Mr. MacLennan stated it isn't of significant value and not in short supply. A gentleman in the audience questioned the costs, if the pro�ect was not to be done for several years. Mr. MacLennan stated he felt at the time of the public hearing, and if and when plans and specifications are drawn, the estimates presented then would be reasonably accurate. Mr. Jeff Carson, Attorney representing Mr. Don Schultz, 15 Rice Creek Way N.E., stated Mr. Schultz has been on Locke Lake since 1954 and his concern is the cost of the project. He indicated Mr. Schultz never received a copy of the study. Mr. Carson stated, when the original permit was taken out for creation of the lake, the Council agreed to bear the full cost of maintenance for the dam and cost of acquisition for any property and all costs in creation of the dam. He stated, from this po�nt forward, the sedimentation began. He questioned whether the dredging of Locke Lake is of benefit to the property owners or really rectifying damage that has occurred Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, questioned Mr. Carson's source of information. Mr. Carson stated he was looking at the permit taken out relative to construction of the dam. Mr. Herrtck stated this does not say anything about the Ctty being responsible for maintaining the lake, but the City is responstble for maintai m ng the dam. Mr Carson stated he was referring to the special provisions on the back. His question is whether the havoc ex�sting in Locke Lake now is because of the dam. 'Mr. Murray, Attorney for the Rice Greek Watershed �istr�ct, stated he agreed w�th Mr. Herrick's comment, but did not agree with Mr. Carson's comment that the City created the damage. Mr. MacLennan stated he spoke with Mr. Schultz on June 8 and encouraged him to go to the City and obtain a copy of the report He indicated he would like the benefit of Mr. Schult's suggestions. Mr. Herrick felt, before a petition is submitted, a decision will have to be made on the funding, and from what source, to stand the cost of the pro�ect. Mr. Dave Harris, 470 Rice Creek Boulevard N.E., stated he was disappointed the study did not take into consideration anything east of the trestle or Metropolitan sewer line. He indicated the creek has changed in character tremendously since he has lived there and the City's outlet, referred to as the 7th Street outlet, is depositing an excessive amount of material in the creek. He felt there was no use in cleaning Locke Lake without doing something in the creek, as it would only be an outlei to fill up the lake again. Mr. Larry Anderson, 220 Rice Creek Boulevard N.E., concurred with P�r. Harris' comments. A resident, who lives on Lacke Lake, questioned the alternatives for improving the lake. Mr. MacLennan stated if the cost for the improvement were to 6e assessed to the persons living on Locke Lake, he felt it would be costly and probably the people �ould not wish to proceed with the pro�ect. He stated �f Locke Lake was cleaned up, »ost likely additional sed�ment will occur from the creek and they will be right back �from where they started. Mr. MacLennan felt the bank protection is a series of problems that will take time to solve, but will make the rate of sediment into the lake lower. He felt, however, sediment will never totally be eliminated in the lake. He indicated the Watershed District has taken steps to prevent as much erosion as possible. •,� �,,, PU6LIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1977 PAGE 4 Ms. Virgin�a Heffner, 580 Rice Creek Terrace N.E., felt all the citizens of Fridley should not be expected to pay for the residents' improvement, who live on the creek or Locke Lake. She felt, if the grant application is approved for Moore Lake, the taxpayers wi]7 also be paying some of th�s cost. In comparison, if Locke Lake was cleaned up, there would be swimming in the lake and pointed out snowmobilers are using the lake. Mayor Nee stated he received several letters regarding this study, one from Colonel , Hoffman, 6900 Hickory Drive N E., and one from Ms. Bjorklund, 48 69th Way N.E., and requested they be received for the record. MO7ION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the letters from Colonel Hoffman dated June 9, 1977 and Ms. B�orklund dated June 12, 1977. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carrted unanimously. Mr. Bert Wilm, 211 Rice Creek Terrace N.E., quested, if the dam was removed, what it would do to the creek. Mr, MacLennan stated, over a period of time, the bed of the creek would come to a uniform 9rade about where it was in 1955, with the exception of the sandbars. Mr, Bo6 Hamilton, Cha�rman of the Rice Creek Watershed District, thanked the Council and citizens for vo�cing their concerns. He did state, however, unless they have a petition from the City or affected property owners, no pos�tive action can be taken. If a petition is received, a public hearin9 would then be necessary. Councilman Fitzpatrick felt it was unlikely a petition would be forthcoming from the residents unt�l they have an tdea who will bear the cost. He questioned who was assessed from the improvement on Long Lake. Mr, D�mke indicated no one has been assessed for the pro�ect at this time, but stated the benefiting properties will pay the assessment. Also, there is a 50% matching � grant He indicated they are now at the point of the public hearin9. Mayor Nee questioned how they determine the proper•ties benefited. Mr. Dimke stated the benefits could 6e financial, aesthetic or improvement in the quality of water Mayor Nee felt no one could say this even�ng how the costs would be paid, and questioned if the Watershed District would have some concept of the assessment at a public hearing. Mr. Dimke felt the Board could give an estimate or general idea of the costs. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt it was apparent the entities that can be assessed; that is, private property owners, the City of Fridley and other municipalities that are contributin9 water �nto the creek and lake. He felt it would be helpful to the Counc�l and to the property owners, if the 8oard could take a general look or give some expression of their philosophy as to how the overall cost might be d�stributed as to benefited properties and how far those properttes benefited extend. Mr. Dimke indicated he understood what Mr. Herrick was saying and perhaps they could have a ballpark figure in about four weeks. Mayor Nee stated he understood the Board determines the assessment and would like an understanding of the philosophy on how the assessment might be distributed. Mr. Glenn Hambleton, 26D Rice Creek Boulevard N.E., stated he would like the Council to consider the inclusion of thatpart of the creek east of the ratlroad tracks and ' probably as far as east of university. He also requested a copy of the study which was made available to him. There was no further discussion and the Council will await a reply from the Watershed District regarding costs and/how they determine the property benefited. PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DF �UNE 13, 1977 f7 & 5, A.S. DIUISION P C� 4 PAGE 5 -03 IWEN TERRACE, BEING A REPLAT MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to waive the reading of the Publ�c Hearing notice and open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a vo�ce vote, all �voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing opened at 10:00 p.m. Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, explained the location of the plat, generally south of the 1000 61ock of Lynde Drive, east of Polk Street and west of Fillmore Street. The proposed plat consists of six parcels of property and the zoning is R-1. � Mr, Sobiech stated there presently exists a marshy area on the propert�es and this area was discussed at the Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommend approval of the plat with six stipulations as follows: 1. Comments and any pertinent requirements if any, must 6e obtained from the Department of Natural Resources regarding allowable alterations to the existing wet land within this plat prior to approval. 2 3 4 A 75 foot drainage and utility easement along the east lot line of Lots 4, 5 and 6 and along the west lot line of Lots l, 2 and 3. A 24 foot drainage and utility easement centered over the common lot line of Lots 4 and 5. A 5 foot drainage and util�ty easement along all property lines not previously mentioned 5. Unless expressly prohibited by the Department of Natural Resources, the owner should relocate the existin9 drainage ditch presently centered on Lot 4 to the common property line of Lots 4 and 5, and an appropriate inlet structure to be constructed as a connection to the existing storm sewer line on Polk Street. A timetable of one year would be appropriate with an acceptable performance bond of $2,000. An alternative would be the acceptance of an agreement together with an escrow of $2,000 for such construction in the future. 6. A triangular street and utility easement over the southwest corner of Lot 4, for future street and utility purposes, the dimensions of which to be determined 6y the Engineering Division and property owners prior to the submission of final plat. Mr. Sobiech stated some additional comments from staff are that with the existing ponding and to assure no drainage problems, they should establish a certain minimum elevation above the normal ponding level. Also, with the development of additional properties, it is recommended that monies be escrowed to pay for an eventual storm sewer system in this area Mr. MacLennan, Engineer for the Rice Creek Watershed District, indicated they had reviewed this plat, but a final recommendation will not be made by the Board until their meeting on June 22, 1977. He stated the staff's recommendation to the Board is that this plat be treated in a similar fashion as Harris Lake Estates. The developer could trade some �of the existing low area for another low area and fill in to accomodate housinq, but to mainta�n the same surface of area for ponding. Councilman Schneider asked if there were any envisions of assessments to other property owners. Mr. Sobiech stated there would be none, except the potential of a storm sewer if property was developed to the south. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, felt there should be an additional stipulat�on that the developer will continue to accept the same drarnage from the drainage district and pay the cost of assessment to the City. It was felt by Council it should be made ��, � r„ PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1977 PAGE 6 clear when the property is sold, that this pond is part of the development and the developer felt this could be written into the agreement as a covenant. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this plat. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowsk� to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried una m mously and the Public Hearing closed at 10•20 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING WYMAN SMITH, B SION P.S. #77-04, NORTON AV LOT 13. A.S. �k89: GENERALL m MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the Public Hearing notice and open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Playor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing opened at 10:20 p.m. Mr. Sobiech stated this is a petition for consideration of a plat onNorton Avenue located to the west of Central Auenue and south of 73rd Avenue. The Planning Commtssion held a public hearing on May 4, 1977 and recommended approval. Mr. Sobiech stated the proposed plat consists of six lots. The property is presently zoned multiple and lot sizes wouid be weli in excess of mTnimum requirements and could be developed as single family or two-family dwellings. Correspondence was received both from Medtronic and Onan re9arding this plat. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the communications from Medtronic dated �une 10, 1977 and Onan dated June 13, 1977 regarding this plat. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Wyman Smith stated he was not sure the comments from Medtronic and Onan were relevant. He stated they seem to imply this is a petition for rezoning. He stated they have met all the requirements and lot sizes are in excess of what is required. He �ndicated there is a possibility of single family residences on these lots. Ms. Ruth Norton, 1251Norton Avenue N.E., asked about the notice she received and questioned the statement where it states that approval of the plat could lead to assessments. Mr. Sobiech explained this notice is a form 7etter sent for all plats and in some cases, there could be assessments, however, thts is not true in this particular case. ' 1 Mr Qureshi, City Manager, stated Medtronic and Onan pointed out, if they have a need to expand, their feeling is that owner-occupted residential um ts would have more ob,7ect�on to them expanding their facilities than if the u m ts were rentals. Mr. Herrick felt the Council should give some thought that if property is zoned R-3, R-1 cannot be built on it. He stated perhaps the City would have more control so that you don`t have a s�tuation where there is multiple dwellings on one lot, single family on another, etc, He suggested perhaps the Planning Commission should review this matter at some future date. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this plat. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the Pu61ic Hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion_carried unanimously and the Public Hearing closed at 10 38 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING ON A ZONING OR�INANCE AMENDP9ENT, ZOA #77-01, BY GARY PETERSON TO REZONE LOTS 3 and 4, BLOCK 2. MEADOWMOOR TERRACE FROM C-1 TO R-2 AND LOTS 22 & 23. BLOCK 2, MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the Public Hearing notice and open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schne7der. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing opened at 10:38 p m. Mr. Sobiech explained the location of the property to be rezoned. He stated the original zo m ng petition was from C-1 to R-2 on all four properties, however, due to discussions and ob�ect�ons ratsed by area residents, the petitioner has requested that the zoning 1 1 „� PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1977 PAGE 7 request be changed to rezone property from C-1 to R-2 on Osborne Road and from C-1 to R-1 on Meadowmoor Drive. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive the letter from Lambert and Petersen, Inc. regarding their request for changes from their original zoning application. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Schneider stated he talked to many of the persons who had signed the petition against the rezoning and felt this compromise with the R-1 on Meadowmoor Drive and R-2 on Osborne Road was agreeable with everyone he had contacted No persons �n the audience spoke for or against this rezoning. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting unanimously and the Public Hearing closed at NEW BUSINESS: Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried 10:43 p.m. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE LOTS 3& 4, BLOCK 2, MEA�OWMOOR TFRRACF FR(1M C_ Tfl R_9 ANfI I f1TS 99 R 9�. RI f1CK 7 MFA�(1WMMR TFRRACF FRf1M C_1 T(] MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon its first reading. Seconded 6y Councilwoman Kukowski_ Councilman Schneider stated the reason he requested first reading of the ordinance this evening, after the public hearing was held, is to end the discussions of th�s rezoning and put the people's mind's at ease. �UPON A VOICE VOTE ON THE AEOVE MOTION, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. I�ERATION OF REQUEST OF VFW POST #363 FOR USE OF MONIES TO PAY TAXES ON UFW nrnir. Mr. Dan Sjodin, Commander of the Fridley VFW Post #363, appeared before the Council regarding their request for permission to use money from their bingo funds to pay the 1976 rea1 estate taxes on their building. He stated their letter indicated an amount of $1D,275, but this should have been $10,265. Councilwoman Kukowski asked if this would be a one iime request only. Mayor Nee indicated he was concerned about upholding the principal of the law regarding use of bingo proceeds and that is why the question was asked if this was a one time request In answer to a question on how much was contributed from the bingo proceeds to community pro,7ects, representatives reviewed the amounts with the Council. The �FW representatives stated, with the new bingo law, they have to use 1Q0% of the bingo proceeds for community pro�ects and if they wish to use these funds for other things, it is necessary to obtain approval from the City Council. Mr. Herrick stated the State law sets forth what the monies can be used for and there is a provision that local units of government can adopt more restrictive regulations, ' if they chose to do so. Mr. Herrick then reviewed the lawful purposes for using bingo proceeds which are outlined in the State Statutes. He stated the request from the VFW, he felt, would ,l'�i PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF ,]UNE 13, 1977 PAGE 8 be a liberal interpretation of the words "maintainin9 real estate" and Council should cons�der if the payment of real estate taxes falls wtthin the description of maintaim ng the building. He felt the Council should consider a limit on the amount of bingo proceeds that can be used for that part�eular category of the State Statute. It would not be necessary then for orga m zations to come with requests to the Council, as long as they fall within the 7imits set by the Council. Mayor Nee felt action could be taken on this request and then also to begin work on the items suggested by the City Attorney. Mr. Brunsell, City Clerk, indicated the licenses expire on June 30. Mr. Herrick su99ested, prior to this date, the Council shoultl take a look at the ordinance and the recording procedures to implement any changes they w�sh. MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to approve the request of the VFW to use $10,265 from their bingo proceeds to pay the real estate taxes on their building. Seconded 6y Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting any, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to instruct the City admim stration to review the bingo license ordinance and su6mit revisions at the first meeting tn July, 1977. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECESS Recess called by Mayor Nee at 11:05 p.m. RECONVENED Mayor Nee reconvened the meettng at 11:18 p m CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTION OF CDNTRACT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CRITRICAL AREAS PLAN Mr. Sobtech requested the Council consider executing an agreement between the City and the Minnesota State Planning Agency for fund7ng for the Critical Areas Plan, He stated the staff was in contact with the State and reviewed the work program regarding the type of items requ�red by law. He stated this Critical Areas Plan would be incorporated with the City's other mandatory planning requirements. He stated this program costs approximately $12,000 with 75% of the cost paid through the grant program. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to enter into the a9reanent with the Minnesota State Planning Agency for development of the Cr�tical Areas Plan. Seconded by Counc�l- woman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried una m mously. CONSIDERATION OF SHADE TREE DISEASE SUBSIDY APPLICATION FOR 1977• Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the State Legislature has changed the subsidy program regarding shade tree diseases. Presently, the State is subsidizing 50% of the cost for removal of the tree, with no costs for admim stration, inspection, or replacement. The new subsidy program by the State will now pay 45% of all costs of the disease control program, tnclud�ng administrat�ve and inspection costs, etc., and also pay 50% of the cost for tree replacement. Mr. Qureshi indicated it will be necessary to increase the budget by $32,000 in order to mainta�n the program of shade tree disease control. It is anticipated this year the City will remove 40% additional diseased trees than last year. Councilman Schneider questioned the 5C�% the State would pay for replantin9 of all trees or if this was only on public lands. Mr. Huff, Naturalist, answered in the affirmative, and stated this covers public lands including boulevard trees. , ' u PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JUNE 13, 1977 �= � PAGE 9 There was a discussion on replacement of boulevard trees, and it was generally felt, if residents wanted a tree, they should be able to obtain one from the City. Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, indicated boulevard trees create problems as far as the sewer system and snow removal. He indicated �n the�r platting procedure, trees are not planted on the boulevard, but on private property. �Mr. Qureshi suggested a similar program to what they now have which would involve an increase in the budget of $32,000 with a moderate restoration of parks. Mayor Nee stated the resolution before the Council is for transfer of funds to the Naturalist �epartment for the shade disease program and in order to keep up with the present program, the amount of funds necessary would be �32,000 which does not include tree replacement. The Council then considered action on the following resolution: RESOLUTIDN N0. 59-1977 - AUTHORIZING THE CHANGING OF THE 1977 BU�GET APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN Tuc r_rnironi riinin cunnr Torc nTCrncc l`l1�ITOf11 ❑onrnnM . MOTION by Counctlman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 59-1977,authorizing the changing of the 1977 budget appropriation within the general fund (shade tree disease control program),inserting the dollar figure of $32,00 plus $8,000 for tree replacement or a total of $40,000. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee also questioned Mr. Huff when the power company triins the trees. Mr Huff stated they have asked them to refrain from cutting the trees during certain periods of time and feels they are cooperating wtth the City, Mayor Nee indicated he would like the City to check and follow through tn this regard_ REDUCED WATER RATES FOR SENTOR CITIZENS: Mayor Nee indicated he received corresponder�e from Mr. Bailey Tiller, 1535 Gardena Avenue N.E., tndicating his ob,7ection as he was not eligible for the reduced water rates for senior c�tizens. Mr. Sobiech indicated it might be a matter of interpretation regarding his income or family income. Mr. Brunsell stated three weeks after the program started, about 160 persons qualified. He stated a more accurate figure could be obtained, �f the Council wished, on why some persons did not qualify. The Council requested this information be furnished for the next meeting. ADJOl1RNMENT: MOTIGN by Councilwoman Kukowski to ad,7ourn the meeting, Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council of June l3, 1977 ad,7ourned at 12:14 a.m. Respectfully su6mitted, J ��"��,t� reCtG�"---t��� _� Carole Haddad William J. Nee � Secretary to the City Council Mayor ; / Approved: �' �� % � �