Loading...
08/10/1981 - 00013146� THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 10, 1981 The Public Heartng Meeting of the Fr�dley City Council was called to order at 7:35 p. m, by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Fl ag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT ADOPTION OF AGENDA. Mayor Nee, Councnlman Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Moses, Councilman Schneider and Councilman Barnette None MOTION by Councilwoman Mtlses to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON WATER AN� SANITARY SEWER PROJECT N0. 134, HEATHER HILLS WEST: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Counc�lwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all vot�ng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motrion carried unanimously_and the public hearing opened at 7:36 p. m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the Heather Hills West plat is located east of Moore Lake, off Old Central Avenue, and consists of construction of two streets, Heather Place and Heather Circle. Mr. Flora stated the developer, Mr. Brickner, has petitioned for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer to be installed th�s year, with the street and concrete curb and gutter to be �nstalled next year. He stated the lot located on the north side of Heather Place �s being charged only for the share of the cost which is of benefit to that property and if th�s lot is later platted or divtded, there would be addttional costs involved in extending the water and sewer lines. Mr. Flora stated the costs affecting the Heather Hills West plat arP being divided equally between the 11 lots in the plat, He stated this is a self-sustatned development and thc only requirement the City would like �s to loop the water system to some dtlaer lineinstead of ,7ust internally. He stated the original plan was for Ben More Drive to be extended all the way down to Central Avenue and be connected to Heather Place, however, there was discussion on the prac�icality of doing �t at this time. Councilman Schneider asked �f Ben More Drive would be extended at some future date, the improvements put in this year would have to be changed. P4r. Flora stated it tvould not because when this particular water system ts installed, it should 7emd itself to at least four other methods of providing a viable system in this area. Councilwoman Moses asked what the assessment would be to the property north of the plat which is owned by Mr. and Mrs. Skinner. Mr. Flora stated the cost for the sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water would be about $18,835. Mr. Skirner stated there has been some discussion between himself and Jerry Boardman, C�ty Planner, as to possi6ilities for development of his property. ' IJ 1 � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 2 He stated, however, at this potnt, he is totally opposed to the assessment of his property without knowing where he stands or what is eventually go�ng to dcve7op as far as his property is concerned. He stated he was not concerned with the Heather H�lls development, as long as he doesn't have to pay for any portion of it. Mr. Sk�nner stated to go along with any approval for his property to be assessed any amount of the costs whatsoever for sewer and water connections go�ng into the Heather Hills development, he is totally opposed to it. He � stated he understood the Heather Nills development was to be self-sufficient and was to bear tts total cost and he has been in total agreement wtth that because it doesn't affect h�m. , Mr. Skinner stated, frankly, he doesn't need a street by his property, but is not opposed to the street being construct�� ?�a_ �the development of Heather Hills, as long as he doesn't have to make a pre-mature decision on paying part of the cost of those improvements Mr. Skinner stated he has had some discussions with Jerry Boardman and one option discussed was the street would be constructed, as proposed, but with no cost to him. He stated he didn't feel at this time that anyone really had a clear cut answer as to what will actually happen if hts property were to develop. He stated there was discussion of crossing the back of his property and ,7oim ng Ben More Dri�e, however, people on Ben More might not want the street to 6e extended. He stated there was also discussion for the street to be extended He stated there was also discussion for the street to cross his property and �oin Rice Creek. He stated, at this time, there seems to be so many thinas for which they have no answers. Councilwanan Moses stated right now, the Council doesn't have all the answers, but questioned if Mr. S4;inner wouldn't have some buildable lots, regardless of what was eventually dec�ded upon on the street design. Mr. Flora stated he felt there would be anywhere from four to stx lots Mr. Skinner could plat on his property. Councilwoman Moses pointed out that this proposed assessment of $18,835 could be spread across these lots, if Mr. Skinner were to plat them. Co'uncilman Sclnneider questioned how this is handled where tt is necessary to put in sewer and water and half of the persons are in favor and the other half opposed. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated the decision on how property is platted and, more parttcularly, the street pattern, �s a decis�on that should be made by the Counc�l and not the individual land owners. He stated that is someth�ng the Council, with theadvic� of the administration, will have to make a decision regard�ng the street pattern. Mr. Nerrtck stated, be greater than the assessed equally. as far as the assessments, the cost of the assessment cannot Uenefits to the property and all properties have to 6e Mr. Herrick felt, tn this case, there are two options. One would be that the street is constructed so it is not ad,7acent to Mr. Skinner's property, if the Council decides they will not assess his property, and another option would be a deferred assessment. � Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Skinner if he woulci 6e in favor of a deferred assessment. r� . PUBLIC HEARING MEETIfVG OF AUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 3 Mr. Skinner felt a deferred assessment would be more �ntrigu�ng to him. He stated he has an interest in developing his property, but the only thing is the time problem of not knowing exactly what �s going to develop, in which direction, and how it will affect his property in the future. He stated he would certainly feel more comfortable with a deferned assessment, and the time frame would be such where he would be pursuing some plans of his ovan and vlhat options tvould 6e open. Mr. Quresh�, City Manager, stated the burden on the City is only to prove that the assessment on any property is equal to the benefit to that property. He stated there is no question in his mind that the property Urould appreciate more than the amount assessed against Mr. Skinner's property. Mr. Qureshi stated he also wanted to make sure Mr. Brtckner understands what � amounts they are est�mating against the property he wishesto develop. He pointed out Mr. Brickner has gtven all the right-of-way for the street and the cost for sewer and water will be over $9,000 per lot plus the assessment for the street improvement. He felt, when all the improvements are completed, the cost would be between $12,000-y13,000 per lot. He asked Mr. Brickner if he felt it was a reasonable assessment and if he could absorb these costs in the development. Mr. Brickner stated the preliminary estimates are a bit higher than he had anticipated, and pointed out it is a difficult piece of land to develop, therefore, there would be only 11 lots in the plat. He stated, however, he knew from the start the cost for development would be high�r for th�s piece of property. Mr. Brickner stated the lots would be larger than average and compared them to the Innsbruck Area where the cost for lots are quite high. Mr. Q«resh� stated, as far as Mr. Skinner's property, his recommendation would be to assess the property on the normal �asis, as he felt this situation is probably no different than any other properties in the C�ty. Mr. Qureshi stated Mr. 6r�ckner has given the full easement for the road and was surprised the assessment against Mr. Skinner's property was low compared with what Mr. Brickner would be assessed. Mr. 6rickner stated he thinks this raises the point that each property must be ' assessed equally. He stated what they a�e now talking about is only estimates of the costs and the final calculations will be done at the time of the assessment hearing. Mr. Qureshi felt there was no opposition to the improvements, but the only question was how the costs should be allocated, and this could be resolved when they have the assessment hearing. Mr. Skinner stated he wanted the Counc�l to be aware that four or six lots they say can be developed by this street being installed, two of these lots happen to be his front yard and if those lots were platted and structures erected, �t would totally and completely cut off any view or access to Central Avenue. Mr. Skinner stated he can see Mr. Brickner's benefit because he is developing vacant property, but where his house and garace is located there is absolutely no benefit, but a detriment to pay for improvements 6ecause he doesn't have any reason to connect into thern without destroying the utilities that are already there. Mayor Nee felt perhaps Mr. Brickner should move the street a foot and if this was done, the Criuncil doesn't have the burden of determi�ning the value of the property to the north. P�r. Br�ckner stated he would be willing to do this, however, he didn't know if it involved any problems in the future where Mr. Skinner would 6e landlocked. Mayor Nee stated it seems Mr. Brickner is getting a terrible burden for being , the leader in development and he should be �n a position to recover some of his investment. � � � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 4 Mr. Qureshi stated he would suggest the Council close the hearing and the administration w�ll come back with a recommendation they feel would 6e appropriate. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting aye, P�ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the pual�c heartng closed at 8 30 n, m. LI EASEMENT. EAST SIDE OF EAST RIVER MO7ION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the publ�c hear•ing. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unan�mously and the �ublic hearing opened at 8:30 p. m. Mr. Flora, Public Works �irector, stated the alley to be vacated is located 6e�ween Ashton Avenue and East River Road and between 61-1/2 and 62nd Way. He stated the petition for the vacation was signed by 100% of the residents in the area, and it is requested the City waive the fee. Mr. Flora stated, if the vacation is allowed, it �s suggested the Ctty retain the utility and dra�nage easements. He further stated that Northwestern Bell and NSP have utility poles in this area. Mr. Richard So�, 6101 East River Road, spoke in favor of this alley vacation No other persons in the audience spoke regarding t'riis proposed alley vacation. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the publtc hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice voie, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:32 p. m. , MOTION by Counctlman Fitzpatrick to instruct staff, when this vacat�on comes before the Council, the fee be waived. Seconded by CoUncilman Schneider Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, � � PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT FOR ISSUANCE -'' DEVELOPMENT AVENUE BONDS TO WINFiELD DEVELOPMEN INDl1ST THE MI h10TI0N 6y Councilwoman Moses to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the pu6lic hearin9. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:33 p. m. Mr. Inrnan, Ctty Clerk, stated '�linfield Developments have requested the issuance of a$4,000,000 industrial revenue bond for development in the Paco Industrial area. He stated representatives from Winfield are here thts evening, along with their legal representatives, to answer any questions. Mr. Rod Taylor, representin9 Winfield Developments, stated they are applying for $4,000,000 in industrial revenue bonds for the construction of a multi-purpose development in the Paco Industrial plat. He stated approximately 250 new �obs will be established as a result of this development and there would be a potential for light manufacturing. Mr. Taylor stated the development would tncrease the City's tax hase and the amount paid in yearly salaries would range from $6,000,000 to $8,OOD,ODO. It was stated by Winfi cld's representattve from Miller-Schroeder that the Crty w�ll enter into a loan agreement with Winfield Development and they would stand by the bonds under a letter of credit by a bank. � `k �„ , � i+ PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 5 Councilwoman Moses asked if the bonds would pay for the entire pro�ect. Mr. Taylor stated their experience tn this particular type of development, wtth bond issues, is that there will be some financing by the company. He stated, at the time the bonds are sold, he didn't think they would be for the total amount of the pro,7ect. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated what they will be doing is applying for a mortgage or sell�ng bonds and, in either case, it would depend on who is , buying them whether they would put up 100% of the ftnancing. He stated the dec�sion on the amount of financing would be between Winfield Developments and who ultimately purchases the bonds. Mr. Herrick stated his concern was about the irrevocable letter of credit and asked tf it has 6een secured. Mr. Taylor stated they have had a number of ineetings with the bank and anticipate receiving the letter of credit within the next 60 to 90 days. He stated the bonds will not be sold until the letter of credit is assured. Councilwoman Moses asked for an explanation regarding the letter of credit. Mr. Herrick stated �f the pro�ect doesn't produce enough revenue to pay the bonds or financing, the bank they receive the letter of credit from is o6ligated to pay off the bonds so it �s a guarantee the bonds will be paid. Mayor Nee stated another question is if this is an appropriate use of industrial revenue bonds. He stated it again raises the question of where they are going to draw the l�ne because they are receiving so many requests. Councilwoman Moses stated she looks at industrial revenue bonds as a help in gett�ng a pro,7ect started, rather than fi nancing the whole pro�ect. Councilman Barnette stated he was in favor of Fridley gett�ng this development, , as long as th�s method �s available. Councilman Schneider pointed out it would be an increase for the City's tax base. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated other communities are using industrial revenue bonds and the question tiaould be if the Counctl wishes to conttnue �n this area. He felt if Fridley wants to compete for development and the company requesting tndustrial revenue bonds ts go�ng to be an asset, they should use this methocl. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he did review the forms submitted by Winfield Development and they are in order and acceptabie. No persons inihe audience spoke regardin9 the issuance of these industrial revenue bonds. MOTION by Councilman 6arnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a vo�ce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the publ�c hear�ng closed at 3:50 p. m. MOTION by Councilwoman Moses to waive the reading o9'the pLiblic hearing notice , and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor fJee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:50 p. m. , PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 6 Mr. Inman, City Clerk, stated th�s is a request for the issuance of �1,250,000 in industrial revenue bonds for acqu�sition ofi land and construction and equtpp�ng of an industrial building to be located in the Paco Industrial Park. He stated the bonds will be a single �ssue to the M�dway Nat�onal Bank. Mr. Flora Public Works Director, presented a schemat�c of the floor plar� for this butldiny. Mr. Bob Hughes, President of Pride Machines, stated, with completion of the�r , butlding, they w�ll be employing 70 to 100 persons. He stated Fridley is a convenient area for them to locate, as a lot of their employees l�ve �n the northern suburbs. No other persons in the audience spoke regard�ng this request for the �ssuance of industr�al revenue bonds. MOTION by Councilwoman Nioses to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all vot�ng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8 52 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: !" ORDINANCE N0. 738 ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 217 OF THE FRI�LEY CITY CODE ENTITLED ' "CONVFR SION CONDOMINIUM" LICENSING MOTION by Councilwoman Moses to waive the second reading of Ord�nance No. 738 and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Herrtck, City Attorney, stated he has started some prelim�nary work regarding the Council's ccncerns in reference to the State statutes regarding condominium conversions. � Councilman Schneider stated the Association of Metropolitan Mu m c�palit�es are adopting the�r policies and what they will 6e lobbying for and thought perhaps the City should d�rect a letter to them on the Counc�l's concern of having more control by the Ctty on condomintum convers�ons. He thought they may have some interest in th�s item. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to author�ze the City Manager to send a letter to advise the Association of the City's concern regaraing condomin�um conversions. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a vo�ce vote, all vottng aye, Mayor Nee declared the mot�on carried unanimously. !, ORDINANCE N0. 736 AMENDING CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CONCERNING DOUBLE BUNGALOWS IN THE R-1 ZONE BY DELETING SECTIONS 205.051-3D AND Councilwoman Moses stated she felt it is �mportant to take double bungalows out of the R-1 zoning, but thinks they have to look at making low and moderate �ncome housing available. Councilman Schnetder stated a document should be distributed shortly which was done by the Associatton of Metropolitan Nlunicipalities and the Metropol�tan Council in wh�ch recommendat�ons were made regarding smaller lot sizes and the possibility of not requiring such wide streets in order to try and make available more housing for low and moderate income persons. � Councilman Schneider stated he talked to the Chairman of the Associat�on of Metropolitan hlunicipaltt�es Housing Committee and asked if she was aware of any ordinance providing conversions to double bungalows. She stated a lot of communittes are lookinq at this and no one, as yet, has come up with a way to prov�de thts type of housing without ,7eopardin ng the R-1 zom ng. �_ , ,, PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF RUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 7 MOTION by Councilman F�tzpatrick to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 736 and adopt it on the second reading and order publicat�on. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carr�ed unanimously. '���+;,�CONSIDERATION OF AN URDINANCE ANENDING CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CONCERNING APARTMENTS IN THE R-1 LONE BY ADDITION OF PARAGRRPH 2O5.051,5: ,, �� �'� NIOTIUN by Councilwoman Moses to table to a later date. Seconded by Counc�lman Fitzpatr�ck. Upon a vo�ce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carriea unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION hIEETING OF JULY 29, 1981: CONSI�ERRTION OF TRULK PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: Councilman Schneider asked if the C�ty can prohibit parking on private property. Nlr. Qures�ri. C�ty Manager, stated some communities have adopted ordinances that prohibit parking on private property, however, he wanted the Council to be fully aware of the implications s�nce there are a number of persons �n the City that would be affected if parking was prohibited. Mr. Qureshi felt tt would be simpler if the issues were broken down regarding parking on the street, parkiny on residential property, and parktng of recreation vehicles, and addressed separately. Councilman Schneider stated he is generally in favor of banning the parking of trucks on the streets, but has some concern over prohibiting parking on pr�vate property. Ms. Gabel stated it was felt the 13,000 pound limit would not encompass recreation vehicles or vans. Mr. Quresh� stated the concern, he understands, is for the semi's and larger trucks wh�ch would be l�censed for over 13,000 pountls. Ms. Gabel stated the Planning Commission checked Coon Rapid's and Blaine's ord m ances and they allow loading and unloading, but no parking. Nlr. John Wright, 563 Ely Street, stated on a tractor you have 70,ODG pounds and up and po�nted out the closest place to store them is Elk River or South St. Paul. Councilman Schneider questioned the design of the restdential streets and what kind of load they could take. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated they have a seven-ton design or 14,000 pounds, Mr. Qureshi, C�ty Nianager, stated staff would 6ring back the item to the Council, w�th more background material, and they could then set a public hearing if they desired. �� APPEALS CONIMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 14, 1981 - � ocnnrcT Gno vnornnirrc rn oFnnrF nrcTnnirr RCTId ►� UCE Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is a request for variances to reduce the distance between advertising signs from the mtm mum of 1,000 feet to 806 feet, and to reduce the d�stance from a resident�al area from the required 500 feet to 400 feet to allow construction of a 49 foot by 14 foot bt116oard to be located in the Holtday Store parkiny lot. 1 , � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 8 Mr. Flora stated what Naegle is proposing is to construct a new s�gn ad�acent to Main Street, removing an extsting sign wh�ch is on the other side of Main Street, and at some time in 1984, to relocate the existing sign to give them the necessary 1,000 feet spacing the ordinance requires. He stated they are, therefore, ask�ng for a three year temporary var�ance for the d�stance between the two sigis. Mr. Flora stated the other variance would not be of a temporary nature and it is to reduce the dtstance of a sign from the residential area from the required 500 feet to 400 feet. , Mr. Flora stated at the Appeals Commisston Nleeting there was a discussion regardiny the effect stgns have on accidents. Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Commiss�on has recommended de m al of the variances as they could not see a definite hardship in not being allowed to place a sign at that location and because �t is a high traffic and safety hazard area. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated this stgn would be very close to a po m t where the accelerat�on ramp enters I-694 and felt it would be a hazard at this location. He stated it has already 6een pointed out the great num6er of accidents on that stretch of highway. Councilwoman Nloses stated she would agree wtth Councilman Fitzpatrick regarding a hazard �n that area. Councilman Schneider stated he cannot see a hardship shown for the variances. He stated another point �s Naegle did have sign�ficant input into the ordinance that was draf ted regulat�ng signs and billboards. MOTION by Councilwoman Moses to concur with the recommendat�on of the Nppeals Commtssion and deny the variances requested 'uy Naegele Outdoor Ndvertising Company. Seconded by Counctlman Schne�der. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � MOTION by Councilman Fttzpatrtck to receive the minutes of the Planning Commtssion Meeting of July 29, 1981. Seconded by Counc�lwoman Barnette. Upon _ a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee tleclared the motion carried unanimously. � PRELIMINARY APPROUAL TO A PROJECT WITH WINFIELD E MOTION 6y Councilwoman Moses to adopt Resolution 83-1981, su6�ect to the condition of the City receiv�ng a letter of cred�t from a bank�ng inst�tution that meets with the City's approval; further, no final approval w�ll be yranted unt�l this document ts received. Seconded by Counctlman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unan�mously. ',' RESOLUTION N0. 84-1981 RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR AN INDUSTRINL FACILITIES TO � , MOTION by Councilwoman Moses to adopt Resolution No. 84-1981. Seconded by Councilman Schne�der. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motton carried unanimously. J�'.- _, _� 1" � � _ �� - PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1981 PAGE 9 RESOLUTION N0. 55-1981 REQUESTING 1980-81 LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDS; N+OTIQN by Counctlman Schnetder to adopt Resolution No. 85-1981. Seconded by Counc�lman Barnette. Counc�lman Schneider questioned where the City is at w�th thetr Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Flora, Publ�c Works �trector, stated they are meeting with Metropolitan Council representatives to determine how the sewaye flow will be handled and some figures will have to be ad,7usted. Mr. Qureshi, City Nlanager, asked about the time table and its being met. Mr. Flora stated if they aon't meet the time table, they will have to apply for 1981-82 grant monies. UPON A VOICE VDTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carrted�unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 86-1981 TO MINNESOTA DEPNRTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REOUESTING 0 MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 86-1981. Seconded by Counctlman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mot�on carr�ed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH MIDWEST PRINTING COMPANY REGARDING WELL: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this letter of agreement between Midwest Printing Company and the City establishes a ftve year period �n which a 41% credit is provided to their water and after this period, their usage data will be reviewed, and a new credit rate will b� established for the next five year period. He stated, at the completion of ten years, this agreement may be sub,7ect to re-negotiat�on upon mutual agreement of both parttes. MOTION by Councilman F�tzpatrick to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute this letter of agreement between Midwest Pr�nting Company and the City for development of a potable well with the City limits. Seconded by Counct7man Schneider. Upon a vo�ce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilwoman Moses to authorize payment of Claims No. 2U4803 through 219601. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT MOTION 6y Councilman Barnette to ad,7ourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unam mously and the Public Hearing Meeting of the Fr�dley C�ty Council of August 10, 1981 ad�ourned at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, � � � „ � �.�C���-��'F�''�' �;�;.��- , yl.k, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secy. to the C�ty Council Mayor Approved: September 14, 1981 � , '