01/18/1982 - 5257OFFICIAL CITY COUNCiL AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 18, 1982
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETZNG
PLEASE SIGN NAME AQDRESS AND ITEM NUM�ER INTERESTED IN DATE: Januar_v 18, 1982
NAME ADDRESS I7EM NUMQER
__-__ -_� __-= ty` ____ __�_____ ______________�_- -�______^-_�__=====sc�c=~== ______-__-_�
.. �
(
-
�
� FRIDLEY CfTY COUNC i L
� .., . ., _ ,
� COI,��CIL P�IEETIfJG — JAr�U�'P.Y 1�, 19�� 7.30 F',P1,
MEMO T0: DEPARTMENT HEADS
� FOLLOIVING ARE THE "ACTIONS �JEEDED"� PLEASE HAVE YOUR ANSWERS
BACK ItVTNE CITY MANAGER�S OFFICE BY THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE THE �
� NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING� THANK YOU. ������ � 7> .
I �,FF�:G��iL GF h�Ii�LTES: —�
ITY MANAGER
0
PUBLIC WORKS
�OJhC I L�"�EET I IvG, �aP:UARY l:, 19E�
_ Adopted with
Correction made on Page 9
ACTION NEEDED: Make correction in minutes
�DOP1�IOiJ OF F.GEI�D�►:
Adopted as presented
GPEid FO f�l;hl, V I S I i 0 f;S :
�CO(�SIDERATION OF ITEt��S �•:OT 0�: �6EP'DA — 1� �°INUTES)
Presentation of $5,000 from LaMaur for Community Park
Mr. Wearne Clayton asked Council to reconsider pylon sign which was denied
at last council meeting. Councilman Fitzpatrick will check into this
F�BLIC EIE�'�FIWG:
PUFiLIC F�EAP,IRG Oh �EPLAT OF If;t•:SBUP•.CI: �+OP.TH TO���F�L�USES
F'LAT j�PS �,vi—OL), GEt�EF'ALLY LOCATED i':ORTI� OF I, Eg�'
EETVrEEh �VEST BAVARIAP; PASS AP�D �+�EST FiP.EP:IvER PASS, E`.'
SUBURbAN �P�GIhEERIPJC, INC. � � . . � � . � � . . � � . � � — 1 �
Hearing opened at 7:55 P.P-t. Closed at 8:12 P.M.
ACTION NEEDED: Put replat on next agenda for consideration
e
�
�
�
FiNANCE
PUBLIC WOR
PUBLIC WOR
�G. JA���t',P,Y
FI,BLIC HEFf�I1�G �CONTI�jUED)
F�GE 2
COIvTINUED PUBLIC NEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT FOR �
ISSUANCE OF �I,�.CG,GUU INDUSTRIAL LEVELOPh�ENT REVENUE
BONDS TO THE �ICE CREEK COMPANY �NDER THE P�1NNESOTA
�`�UN I C I PAL I NDUSTR I AL LEVELOPMENT ACT � P� I NPJESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER �:��� � COIvT I P;UED FROM 11��5��1) ����. �
Public Hearing opened at 8:12 P.M. Closed at 8:15 P.M.
NO ACTION NEEDED AS REQUEST HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER AT THIS TIME
OLL BI,S I ��ESS :
COt�SIDERATI01v OF ZND READING OF OP.DINANCE TO �MEND
CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, P�INNESOTA BY P�AKING
A CHAtiGE IN LOhING LISTRICTS FP.OM R-3 TO CR-1
iLGA �,�0—GZ), I.GUI HILLWIhD fOAD, �ED BURANDT,
LBA/Sw i r.G �EALTY � I ABLED FROM � I TY �0 Uf�C I L r'EET I NG
oF 11/��/�1) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , �
Tabled second reading to second meeting in March
ACTION NEEDED: Put this item back on the agenda March 22, 1982
iJ�l�� BLS I PiESS :
� S
CONSIDERATION OF IST P,EADIIvG OF ORDIhANCE �.MENDING
CHAPTER 11 �SIGNS AhD PERMITS) AND CONSIDERATION OF
FEVISING OF CHAPTER LZG �RESIDENTIAL P�AIPJTENP.NCE CODE) � �� —�� B
Adopted on first reading with amendment of 217a, Subdivision (d)--
Chan�e $20 to $50
ACTION NEEDED: Amend ordinance as adopted and put on next agenda for
consideration of second reading
�
PUBLIC WORKS
�
' PUBLIC WORKS
COli�1C I L�iEET� I f�G, JAf �t;�:�Y lr�, 1�'�� P�1GE 3
I�E��J BLS I i�E$$ i �ONT I hUED)
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP ���.-IO TO
CONTIIvUE SALES LOT, %El5 VIROh ROAD, SUBURBAh EIOMES,
IIvC� �AT P.C� MEETING OF �1��;��1, REFERRED TO COUNCIL
FOR COP�SIDERATION Oh 1/1�/�2) � � � � � � � � . � � � � � � ' � E
Plarning Comm. Recommendation: Approval with 5 stipulations
Council Action Pdeeded: Consideration of Recommendations
Special Use permit approved with six stipulations
ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council approval with stipulations
0
F;ECEIVING THE PLANNING COM��1ISSION P�1NUTES OF
�ANUARY �, lyo� , � � � � � � � � � � � � ► � . � � � � � E - E I
A. Consideration of Request for Lot Split, LS #81-03, so
Property can be Sold, 120 Fireside Drive, Servomation
Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6A
Planning Comm.�Recommendation: Approval�with �&�6G - 6I
stipulations
Council Action Needed: Consideration of Recommendation
Approved with three stipulations
ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council approva7 with three stipulations
�(ECEIVING THE CNARTER COMMISSION ��1P;UTES OF
f �OVEMfiER 10, 15�1 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 7 - 7 C
Minutes received
PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: File for future reference
CO��SIDERATIOPJ OF COMMUNITY I�EVELOPMEIvT BLOCK CRANT
iROJECTS FOR I��L � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � - � . � � - o C _
Item tabled to meeting of February 1, 1982
, PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Put on nex�, agenda
,
.
COl►��CIL MEETI�JC, JAf�UP,FY 1�, 19£2
��EW $�S I I�E$S i �ONT I �UED)
P�'GE �,
RECE I VE B I DS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOP. �;EPA I R OF I'�ELL
� ii0 � L �B IDS OPERED 1/E%�52 a-r 11: �� A � M � ) � � � . � � � � 9 ' 9 E
Bids received and warded to low bidder, Bergerson-Caswell
, PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Inform all bidders of Council action
�
PUBLIC IJORKS
FIPJANCE
FINANCE
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION �UTHORIZINC- A STUDY TO
DETERMINE IF THERE EXISTS IN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY A
SIGNIFICANT SHORTAGE OF SJITABLE RE�TAL �WELLINGS -
�,VAILABLE TO �OW AND h�ODERATE INCOME FAMILIES ��.��� 10 - 10 A.
Resolution No. 4-1982 adopted with amendment-- add words: "and hold a
public hearing before the City Counci7" to 4th paragraph.
ACTION �dEEDED: Amend resolution as adopted and proceed as authorized
COhSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTIO(� IPJ OPPOSITION TO
COMBINING THE �CITY OF �INNEAPOLIS Ih A LEGISLATIVE
�JISTRICT � � � . � � � � . � � � � � � . � � � � � � � 11
Resolution No. 5-1982 adopted with amendments
ACTION NEEDED: Amend resolution as adopted and forward resolution to
legislators and State.
COIvS I DERAT I ON OF A RESOLUT I ON �iETERM I N I NG Ti�E �JEED
TO COhSTRUCT PUBLIC .RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AIvD THE
ISSUANCE OF GENEP,AL OBLIGATIOh FiONDS TO PAY FOR THE
SA�1E A�JD CALL I hG AN ELECT ION � � � � � � � � . • � �
Resolution No. 6-1982 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with e7ection
i2.-1�C
e
FINANCE
�
PUBLIC WORKS
' PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC WORKS
� r,.ir, iori
f�EW $�S I i�ESS ( Co�T � tvuED)
r
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION �ESIG�vATING POLLING
PLACES A[vD APPOINTING ELECTION �UDGES FOR THE
FEBRUARY IE, I��Z $PECIAL ELECTIO�i . � � � � � . � . � � 13 ' Z� B
RESOLUTIOIV N0. 7-1982 adopted with change to be added that all names a
building is know as be used
ACTION NEEDED: Change resolution to show all names a building is designated b,
CONSIDERATIOfJ OF A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATIPJG MUNICIPAL
STATE AI D FUPJDS TO CSAH PROJECT i�d0 � OL—EUI—ZE, S IGNAL .
E.AST RIVER ROAD APvD 4�RD ��rEt�UE � � � � � � � � � � � �
RESOLUTION N0. 8-1982 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized
CONSIDERATIOIv OF A RESOLUTION FENAMIPJG A PORTION OF
ST, 19�1—� STREET IMPROVEN1EhT QROJECT �INTERSECTIOh
IMPROVEMENT AT i�RD �;VEIvUE AND �N I VERS ITY �VENUE) TO
THE ST. 1��2—Z STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ����.
RESOLUTION N0. 9-1982 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized
1�; - 1�'. �'
, , , 1�-I��`
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERIP�G IMPROVEMEhTS,
APPROVAL OF PLANS AIvD ORDEP.I fvG ��DVERTI SEMENT FOR �IDS :
NEMOVAL AhD f�EPLACEMEN7 OF I��1SCELLANEOUS CONCRETE
CURB, GUTTER AI`�D SIDEWALK—I.9�2 � � � � . � � . � . �
RESOLUTION N0. 10-1982 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with advertising for bids
„ 16-lEB�_
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINAN�E
d
_
�-
I"
,�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNC 1 L
COIii�CIL P�IEETI�JG — J�.iIU�!P.Y lE, 19Er — 7:30 P,P1,
I PLEliGE OF �',LLEG I Ai�CE :
�FF�O�RL GF f�Ii��1�ES:
�OJhC I L�`�EET I fvG, �a�UARY �;, 19E�
I �►DOP1�IOid OF �.GEf�D��:
GPEI� FO f��hl, V I S I i 0�S :
��OfJSIDERATION OF ITEP�S P�OT OP: �GE�:DA — 1� �1INUTES)
PI,BLI C fIE�'�f' I (JG :
PUBLIC f3EAF?IP�G Oh F�EPLAT OF It:��:SBUP•.CI; P�OP.TH TOb�hF�QUSES
F'LAT J�PS �,�i—OL), GE�vEF-'.ALLY LOCATED i';ORTH OF I, Eg�:
BETV�EEh �YEST BAVARIAPd F�ASS At�D �+�EST FiP,EP�NER P�1SS, EY
SUBURbAN �P�G I hEER I PdC, 1 hC � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � — 1 �
�G. JAf����',RY I�, 1��� 2___ FPGE 2
FLBLIC HE�f�II�G iCONTIPjUED)
COI�TINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT FOR '
ISSUANCE OF �I,�.CG,GUU IhDUSTRIAL �EVELOPh�ENT REVENUE
BONDS TO THE ii10E CREEK C�M,PANY �NDER THE P�1NNESOTA
�`�UN I C I PAL I NDUSTR I AL �EVELOPMENT ACT � I�� I NP�ESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER �:���� � CONT I P+UED FROM 11/�S/�1) ,���� �
OLli BL,S I ��ESS :
CO��SIDEF�ATIOIv OF 2ND FEADING OF ORDINA7VCE TO PMEND
CI TY CODE OF THE C I TY OF FRI DLEY, P�I N�JESOTA BY ��AKI NG
A �HANGE IN LOhING LISTRICTS FROM R-3 To �F-1
iLG�► �,�0-O�), lGUl HILLWIhD ROAD, 1ED BURANDT,
LBA/SWII�G REALTY � IABLED FRflM CITY COUhCIL PAEETING
oF 11/��/�;1) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , �
iJE.I�� BLSI��ESS:
CONSIDERATION OF IST P,EADIIvG OF ORDIhANCE �.MENDING
CHAPTER 11 (S��NS AhD PERMITS) AND CONSIDERATION OF
�EVISING OF CHAPTER 12G �RESIDENTIAL P�AI�JTENA.NCE CODE) � �� '�= B
0
- - � � . .- . . . .
. __ . _ . . . _ . - ,� - � ' ._ --- . .
/
i
,
�
COl1NCI L���EET I(rG, JAir��:f�Y �G, 1�J��
(�Et�� B�SIi�ESS ECONTIhUED)
F�GE 3
CONSIDERATIQN OF SPECIAL �SE PERMIT, SP ���1—IO TO
CONTItiUE SALES LOT, %E�5 VIROR ROAD, SUBURBAh �IOMES,
I1vC� �AT F,C� MEETING OF �II�;��1� REFERRED TO COUNCIL
FOR COtvSIDERATION Oh 1/l�i/F2) � � � � � � � � . . � � � � J - J E
P•larning Comm. Recominendation: Approval with 5 stipulations
Council Action fJeeded: Consideration of Recommendations
�
F;ECEIVING THE PLANNI�;G COM��IISSION I��1NUTES OF
�ANUARY E, l�o� , � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � � � � E - E I
A. Consideration of Request for Lot Split, LS #81-0�, so
Property can be Sold, 120 Fireside Drive, Servomation
Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6A
Planning Comm.�Recommendation: Approval with �&�6G - 6I
stipulations
Council Actian tdeeded: Consideration of Recommendation
�tECEIVING THE CHARTER COMMISSION `'�1P:UTES OF
�+OVEMBER 10, 1��1 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 7 - 7 C
COf�SIDERATIOPJ OF COMMUHITY I�EVELOPMEfvT BLOCK CRANT
iROJECTS FOR 19�2 � � � � � � � • � � � � � � � � � ' � � • & - S O _
"
COI,��CIL MEETI�JG, JA�+UAFY 1�, 19�2
�'rE� B�S I(��SS i �ONT I f�UED)
P�GE �s
f�ECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOP. �,�PAIR OF I'�ELL
ij0� � tBIDS OPERED 1/E%�S� AT 11:�� A�M�) �������. 9— 9 E
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION �UTHORIZINC A �TUDY TO
DETERMINE IF THERE EXISTS IN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY A
SIGNIFICANT SHORTAGE OF SJITABLE REhTAL �WELLINGS -
F,VAILABLE TO LOW AND h�ODERATE INCOME FAMILIES ���.�� 10 — 10 A.
�OhSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IPJ OPPOSITION TO
�OMBINING THE`�ITY OF �IINNEAPOLIS lh A �EGISLATIVE
�JISTRICT � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11
0
COIvSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION �JETERMINING TiriE �JEED
TO CO�iSTRUCT PUBLIC •RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND THE
ISSUANCE OF GENEP.AL OBLIGATION BONDS TO PAY FOR THE
$AP1E AND �ALL I hG AN ELECT I Oh � . � � � � � � � � � . 12. — 1� �
,
���rri r��F- � Trar, _.iar�i,�,�v ��.. »�;� f'�'GE �
��E�J B�S I iJESS ( CONT I NU ED)
COIVSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION �ESIG�vATIhG POLLIN�
PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION �'tJDGES FOR THE
FEBRUARY IE, I�J�2 $PECIAL ELECTION � � � � � � . � . � , 13 — 13 �
� CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MUNICIPAL
STATE AID FUNDS TO CSAH PROJECT i�d0� OL—ECl1—ZEry SIGNAL .
EAST RIVER ROAD AP�D 4�RD P:�E(vUE � � � � � � � � � � � � 1�: ' ��` �
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FENAMIPdG A PORTION OF
5T� Ig�l-2 STREET IMPROVENiEhT PROJECT �INTERSECTIOh
IMPROVEMENT AT i�RD �►VEIVUE AND �NIVERSITY �.VENUE) TO
THE ST� 1��2—Z STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT � � � � � � � � l� — I� �
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERIPJG IMPROVEMEIvTS,
APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERI(vG �'�DVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS:
PEMOVAL AhD f�EPLACEMENT OF P�1SCELLANEOWS CONCRETE
�URB, �UTTER A��D SIDEYdALK—Ig�2 � � � � � � � � � . � . � 1� — 1E ,� "
�
„
3
THE MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING OF THE FRID�EY CITY COUNCIL OF
JAPdUARY 4, 1982
�
a
�
�
THE MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
JANUARY 4, 1982
The Council Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at
7:35 p. m. by Mayor Nee.
PLED6E OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
FIEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman
Moses-Martin, Councilman Schneider and Councilman
Barnette
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL Of MINUTES:
REGULAR MEETING, DECEMBER 7, 1981:
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
atye, Mayor P�ee declared the motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING LDECEMBER 14, 1981: '—
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatricl: to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFfICE TO ELECTED OFFICIALS:
Edward L. Hamernik, Ward I aqd Edward J. Fitzpatrick, Ward III
Mr. Sid Inman, City Clerk, administered the oath of office to Council-
members elect, Edward Hamernik and Edward Fitzpatrick.
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE - CHERYL MOSES-MARTIN:
�layor Nee presented, on behalf of the Council, a plaque to Councila�oman
Moses-Martin for her services as Council representative from Ward I.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated her term on the Council was a very
rewarding experience and thanked staff and the Council members for
their help in allowing her tc make intelligent decisions.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated her term has been an educational
process and regreted that she is leaving at this point in time. She
felt the Council will be dealing with difficult problems in the future
in the face of Federal and State budget cuts.
She further stated she believed the Courrcil and staff really try to
work with every citizen in Fridley in development of the City and its
programs so everyone will benefit. She stated she realizes Fridley
is very progressive and is a forer��nner for many programs.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated she was proud to represent the City
and thanked the citizens for giving her the opportunity to serve on
the Council.
Councilman Ed harrernik stated he was glad to be back to familiar
surroundings on ihe Council and thanked the citizens for giving him
the opportunity to serve.
j �.
� _ �. _
�
! _
�
! �
1
�
COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1982 PAGE 2
He stated he would appreciate hearing any concerns anyone has on City
matters, particularly those in Ward I, and hoped he can represent their
posfition on the Council.
Councilman Ed Fitzpatrick stated he wished to thank those persons in
Ward III who supported him and wants to serve them, as well as all the
residents of Frid7ey, in the next three years as he has done in the last
seven years.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Councilman Schneider requested the foilowi�g item be added to the agenda:
"Discussion Regarding Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council".
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addi-
tion. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS;
Mr. Tony Lorbeski, 6101 Sunrise Drive, President of the Friendly Fridley
Folks, appeared before the Councii regarding funding for the Senior
Citizens.
Mr. Lorbeski stated the last time he was before the Council, he was told
if the Senior Citizens could obtain space for a center, then the Council
may help with some financial assistance.
Mr. Lorbeski stated they have been offered space in the Community Education
Building to be used 100% by Senior Citizens, and they are now in the
process of filing an application for.grant monies. Mr. Lorbeski stated
he is requesting $1,500 from the Council, as an indication of support
from the corrmunity for their project, and hoped this would enhance their
position when the grant is being considered.
Counci]man Barnette stated the Senior Citizens have been persevering for
a long time and were given an indication, if they received space, the
City would provide some financial assistance. He stated he would like to
commend Mr. Lorbeski for his persistence and shows that, in the long run,
government does work.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to confirm a commitment to the Senior
Ci�tizens in the amount of $1,500, the funds to be taken for the Contin-
gency Account. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSI��ESS:
►.� 1 �iRESOLUTI0N�N0. 139-1981 (REAPPROVA� - A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR fHE
, n., r�� r nr nr��r.���r n.inc Tn nnnvrnr rnninc rn n[ i nnurn 7n
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he was advised that the way the
original financing plan was structured, there was a question whether
it may conflict with one of the SEC regulations, so some minor changes
were made. '
Mr. Herrick stated the bond counsel thought the change was significant
enough that it should be approved again by the Council and stated the
change in the resolution consists of two words and it doesn't have any
impact on the City.
COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 14, 1982
PAGE 3
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reapprove Resolution No. 139-1981.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS•
2 RECEIVING THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 1981:
2 A A. CONSIDERATION_OF,PRELIMINARY PLAT,'PS,�l81-04, INNSBRUCK NORTH
RI
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this preliminary
plat for January 18, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Ilamernik. Upon a voice
vote, all voting a�ye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
2 B B. CONSIDERATION OF MOTION BY PLANNING COPIMISSION ON COP1D0�1INIUN.
CONVERSIONS•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the unanimous recanmendation
of the Planning Commission that a study be undertaken to determine the
effect of condominium conversion in the City. Seconded by Councilman
Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor PJee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, distributed a memo tcrthe Counci7 prepared by
his office in response to an earlier request for him to look into some of
those aspects of condominium conversion. He stated there is some material
franthe League of Cities, as well as copies of ordinances adopted by other
cities, and he would make them available to anyone who wantes to look at
them.
Mr. Herrick stated, basically, the issue that was asked of him was the
� study of the statute and to advi;P what the City would have to do if
they wanted to declare a moratorium. He stated if the City wants to
declare a moratorium, it wou7d be necessary to adopt an ordinance,
preferable using the language of the State statute, and hold a public
hearing to receive testimoRy that there is a shortage of housing.
Councilman Schneider asked what would establish the criteria for a
shortage.
Mr. Herrick stated he felt it is at the discretion of the Council, however,
some evidence would have to be submitted, by staff or outside persons who
deal in housing, plus testimony of individuals who are renting low and
moderate cost housing the City, as to the effect of having to relocate
and try to find suitable substitute housing. Mr. Herrick stated, based
on evidence presented at the public hearing, it would be up to the Council
to decide if there is a shortage. Ele pointed out if they make that decision,
it is subject to rhallenge in the courts.
Councilman Barnette stated he talked to members of the Community Development
Commission and they feel frustrated as they are not able to come up with
anything that is not in conflict with the State law.
Councilman Barnette asked what the defination is for low and moderate income.
Mr: Herrick stated HUD subsidies specifiy the income limitations that people
can have to qualify and also specifies the maximum amount that can be charged
for low and moderate income units..
, p
i ` _ .
�:�. -
�
1
�
NC..
•%
COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1982 PAGE 4
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated he assumes the Planning Lbrtmission
wants to find out factual situations and the only means for determing
this would be by calling persons in the City or from information available
from the Metropolitan Council. He stated he wasn't sure if the census
could provide them with the necessary information.
Councilman Schneider stated he would like to proceed with the study and
meet the criteria of the law so if the facts bear out there is a shortage,
they could make a decision on the moratorium.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the question brought up by the
Planning Commission is if there are any low and moderate income persons
affected by corrdominium conversions.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to direct administration to bring a
resolution before the Council setting forth the necessary process to
perform the study described in Statute 515.A in order to make a deter-
mination whether or not there is a shortage of rental property for low
and moderate income persons in the City of Fridley. Seconded by Council-
man Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Plee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
� C C. PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOODS AND NAMES fOR USE WITH NEIGHBORHOOD
SIGN PROGRAM:
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated since the City is separated by major
highways, the neighborhood sign concept is a means of having persons
identify with a certain neighborhood and of giving them a sense of
corrmun i ty.
Councilman Schneider stated the facts discussed at the Planning Co�nission
Meeting were the colors in the sign and that the street signs would have
to be changed to go with the logo.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the plan is to add the logo on to
the existing street sign. He stated the question has to be answered
if there is a problem with the logo or with the colors of the logo.
Councilman Schneider felt the proposal for creating neighborhood spirit
and identity is good, but the question on how to go about identifying
neighborhoods wou7d have to be resolved.
Councilman Barnette asked how many areas in the City were identified for
the crime prevention program. Mr. Qureshi stated 18 or 20 neighborhood
areas were identified for this program.
Councilman Barnette stated he liked the idea of neighborhood signs and
felt it would have a positive effect on the neighborhood, however, he
stated he didn't like the proposed names to be given to the areas.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the Council wouldn't necessarily have
to go with the names proposed, however, they would have to eventually
make a determination regarding what name's neighborhoods would be given.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the concept used was from the
Comprehensive Plan which shows the City has 13 neighborhoods and they
tried to use the neighborhood park name in certain areas and, in other
areas where there wasn`t a neighborhood park, other options were used.
Councilman Fitzpatrick thought it was fine to identify neighborhoods,
but when he saw how his area was identified, he felt two-thirds of the
persons in the area wouldn't recognize this identity. He felt the
proposal needs a lot of work in terms of area boundaries and neighborhood
titles.
�
COUNCIL MEETIN6 OF JANUARY 4, 1982 PAGE 5
Mayor Nee stated he felt the concept was a very positive thing although
he didn't like the design.
Councilman Hamernik felt the signs could have some positive effects, but
there would have to be some limitations or ground rules.
Councilman Schneider suggested having the areas in the crime prevention
program pick a name for their neighborhood.
� It was the general concensus of the Council that they felt the concept
of the neighborhood.sign was good, but more work was needed to determine
t how neighborhoods would be named and to change the design of the sign.
2 D D. RECEIVING APPEALS COMPIISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 17, 1981:
1. CONSIDERATION Of UARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE NUMBER OF
GARA6E STALLS FROM 3 TO 1 TO ALLOW TEMPORARY HOME
OCCUPATION, 5111-5115 3RD STREET, ANDRES WLASTUK:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this variance is requested to
reduce the number of garage stalls from three to one to allow a temporary
home occupation at 5111-5115 3rd Street.
Mr. Flora stated this structure has a two car garage on the property
and the property owner wants to convert one of the existing garages
into a home occupation so his wife could continue her tailoring business.
Mr. Flora stated a motion was made Dy the Appeals Commission for approval
of the variance, but was defeated by a 2 to 2 vote.
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated there are five structures in this area
where others have been required to meet the code or at least come close
to neeting the requirements. He stated the area across the street is �
� relatively new consisting of single family homes.
Fi0TI0N by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendations of
staff and the Appeals Commission to deny this variance request. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
�� 2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST TO ALLOW A SECOND PYLON
SIGN FOR OtJE YEAR, 7441 EAST RIVER ROAD, RED'S KORNER
PIZZA, WEARNE R. CLAYTON:
Mr. Flora, F�blic Works Oirector, stated this request is for a variance
to allow a second pylon sign for a one year period for property located
at Osborne Road and East River Road.
Mr. Flora stated the Sign Code only allows one free standing sign and
this is a new business and the petitioner desires some visibility from
East River Road, as the building is set quite far back from the street.
Mr. Flora stated the variance requested is to allow an additional sign
for a one year period to allow the petitioner to obtain a patronage
for his business.
Councilman Fitzpatrick felt the area is fairly cluttered as it is and
had a concern that once the sign is up, it may be difficult getting
� them to remove it after one year.
Mr. C�ureshi, City Manager� pointed out the Council would have to establish
the fact that there is a special hardship before they could grant the
variance.
l7
3
COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1982
PA6E 6
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to deny this variance request based
on the fact that the City is attempting to reduce this sort of thing
on a City-wide basis. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
AGREEMENTS:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director� stated the City enters into two
agreements annually with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
He stated one agreement supports the MWCC sewer line coming from
Mounds View through the City to the main interceptor and the other
agreement supports the MWCC sewer line coming from Co7umbia Heights
to the main interceptor.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Mayor and City Manager
to enter into these two agreements, No. 191 and No. 67, with the Metro-
politan Waste Control Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Upon a voice vote, all votTng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
�•'• L� CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT TO PAY FOR SIGNAL IMPROUEMENT,
EAS7 RIVER ROAD AND 43RD AVENUE:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director. stated at the la�t Council meeting,
the Council approved the alignment agreement with,:�e County for the
installation of traffic signals and intersection improvement on East
River Road and 43rd Avenue bridge approach.
Mr. Flora stated the City has now received the estimated cost of the
project which would be $10,500 for the City's portion, and funds for
this project were included in the 1982 budget. Mr. Flora stated this
project is basedon the County re�Piving 6reat River Road funds and if
these funds are not received. thc�-::ounty will re-evaluate the project.
MOTION Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the expenditure of $10,800
for the City's portion of this improvement, with the stipulation that
if Great River Road funds are not available, the County would re-
evaluate this project and identify any changes which would result from
- not receiving the funds. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously,
5 CONSIDERATION OF CHAN6E ORDER N0. 1 FOR REPAIRS ON 1.5 MILLION 6ALLON
RESERVOIR, BODA CONSTRUCTION COP1PANY, INC., 876.80:
Mr. Flora, Public Workfi Director, stated the City had a contract with
Boda Construction Company, Inc. to repair the 1.5 million ga7lon
reservoir and in conjunction with the repair work, it was felt it
would be appropriate to repaint the repair work with the same color
as the reservoir.
Mr. Flora stated this required some special paint and mixing to match
the color at an increased cost of $�76.;80, and asked Council to consider
approval of this change order.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 1 with
Boda Construction Compapy� Inc. for repairs on a 1.5 million gallon
reservoir and the purchase and application of 40 additional gallons
of acrylic coating requiring specia] mixing in the amount of $876.80.
Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
�
. �
_ � .
_ .,
__- --- ,
��
7
COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1982 PAGE 7
(' s CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO DIFFERENT AGENCIES:
AND
CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO CITY COMMISSIONS:
AND
COP�SIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE
DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY:
MAYQR PRO TE�1:'
� MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to re-appoint Councilman Schneider as
� Mayor Pro Tem. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ANOKA COUNTY LAW fNFORCEMENT COUNCIL:
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to appoint Councilman Schneider as
Representative to the Anoka County Law Enforcement Council. Seconded
by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
--- MOTION by Councilman Barnette to appoint Councilman Hamernik as
Alternate to the Anoka County Law Enforcement Council. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION N0. 1-1982 DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR
TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY:
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to appoint Councilman Hamernik as
Representative to the Suburban Rate Authority. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor ��ee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
� MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to appoint Councilman Barnette as Alternate
to the Suburban Rate Authority.. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTIOW by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 1-1982, des-
ignating Councilman Hamernik as Representative and Councilman Barnette
as Alternate to the Suburban Rate Authority. Seconded by Councilman
Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
NORTH SUBURBAN SEWER SERVICE BOARD:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to appoint Councilman Barnette as
Representative to the North Suburban Sewer Service Board. Seconded
by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to appoint Councilman Schneider as
Alternate to the North Suburban Sewer Se'rvice Qoard. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ASSOCIATION OF �tETROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES:
�� MOTION by Councilman Schneider to appoint Councilman Fitzpatrick as
Representative to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities.
Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unaimously.
$
0
`
COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1982
PAGE 8
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to appoint Councilman Hamernik as
Alternate to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Seconded
by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
SCHOOL DISTRICT #14 COMMUNITY SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL:
MOTION by Counci7man Schneider to appoint Councilman Barnette as
Representative to School District �14 Comnunity School Advisory
Council. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
SCHOOL DISTRICT #13 REPRESENTATIVE:
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to appoint Councilman Fitzpatrick as
Representative to School District #13. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote,, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIOERATIOPJ OF APPOINTMENTS TO CITY COMMISSIONS:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table the remaining appointments to
the Commissions to the first meeting in February. Seconded by Council-
man Fitzpatri��. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
RESIGNATION - POLICE CON�IISSION:
Councilman Hamernik stated since he has taken the oath as Councilmember
of the City, he would no longer be able to serve on the Police Commission,
and asked that the Council receive his resignation from the Cortmission.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the resignation of Ed Hamernik
from the Police Commission, effective immediately. Seconded by Council-
man Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor ��ee declared
the motion carried unaimously.
APPOINTMEPlT - POLICE COMMISSIOtt:
Councilman Hamernik stated he does have a nominee to fill the vacancy on
the Police Comnission and made the following motion:
MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to nominate John Hinsverk for appointment
to the Police Comnission. Seconded by Counci7man Fitzpatrick. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he appreciated Ed Hamernik's work on
the Police Commission and stated he had several matters before him and
he did a very fine job. He further stated he fe]t Mr. Hinsverk would
also do a fine job and was pleased he was accepting this appointment.
RESOLUTION N0. 2-1982 DESIGNATING OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY:
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated one change should be made in this
resolution to change the word "all" in the third paragraph and the
sixth paragraph to the word "two".
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 2-1982, with the
above work correction. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
�
�
8
.� 9
�
lU
COUNCIL MEETING Of JANUARY 4, 1981
PAGE 9
RESOLUTION N0. 3-1982 DESIGNATIqG AN OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR THE YEAR 1982:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 3-1982 naming the
Fridley Sun as the legal newspaper for the City of Fridley for 1982.
Seconded by Eouncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye.
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 348503
through 360F22. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor t�ee declared the motion carried unanimously.
LICENSES:
MOTIO(� by Councilman Barnette to approve the licenses as submitted and
as on file in the License Clerk'S Office. Seconded by Councilman Namernik.
Upon a voice vote, all vot:ing aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
1 1 ESTIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted.
Boda Construction '—
12325 Cloud Drive N.E.
Mpls., MN 55434
FINAL Est. #3 - repairs on 1.5 million
gallon reservoir $876,gp
Seconded by Councilman Schneider� Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried �nanimously.
` 1� DISCUSSION - ANOKA COUNTY JOINT LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNCIL:
Councilman Schneider stated none of the actual members, with the exception
of the Sheriff and under Sheriff, have seen the budget for the Law
Enforcement Cou�cil and when the budget meeting was cancelled, the
attorney indicated they had a budget cortmittee meeting review of the
budget and passed it on to the County Board. Councilman Schneider
stated a budget cortunittee was never established by the Joint Law
Enforcement Council.
�
Councilman Schneider stated several persons in the north suburbs are
concerned about problems with the Joint Law Enforcement Council and the
few meetings they did have, Bob Johnson tried to re-focus on some objec-
tives. He stated Mr. Johnson had suggested they meet to work out a cortanon
set of objectives and possibly restructure the group.
Councilman Schneider stated they had a heated meeting and the concensus
was they wou1d meet in January with a professional meeting facilitator
on a set of objectives. He stated, however, the County Board has denied
the $1,500 it would cost to hire a meeting facilitator.
Councilman Schneider felt something should be done to get this group
reorganized and establish some workable objectives. He stated he has
some concern about the rules not being followed in holding the meetings,
as spelled out in the Joint Powers Agreement. He further stated the
Joint Powers Agreement will probably have to be amended because there
are several other cities that are large enough to join.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt one question might be if the City ;
should consider dropping out of the Joint Law Enforcement Council.
... _ � _ :
. �
- � `.
!�__
�
lU
COUNCIL'MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 10
1 � COUNTY fUNDS•
Councilman Barnette stated he understands that Coon Rapids and Biaine
will both be receiving monies from the County for recreation facilities,
and he felt if they are going to give these funds, Fridley should get in
line to receive some for the proposal recreation building.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of
the Fridley City Council of January 4, 1982 adjourned at 9:35 p, m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secy. to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
��P- ;
_ _ _ _ __ ��`.'._�._ _ .
1
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council
of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on
Monday, January 18, 1982, in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose
of : .
Consideration of a Final Plat, P.S. #81-04,
by Suburban Engineering, Inc., Innsbruck
North Townhouses Plat 7, being a replat of
Blocks 1, 3, 4, and 5, and part of Lot 1,
Block 10, all located in Innsbruck PJorth
Townhouses Plat 5, because the construction
� didn't follow the lot lines as platted,
all lying in the South Half of Section 24,
T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka,
, Minnesota.
Generally located between 41est Bavarian Pass
and l�lest Brenner Pass N.E., North of I.694.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the
above stated time and place.
�
Publish: December 30, 1981
January 6, 1982
�
WILLIAPI J. NEE
MAYOR
a
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 9, ]981
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Harris ca led the December 9, 1981� Planning Commission meeting
to order at 7:42 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
IMembers Present: Mr. Harris Mr. Saba, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda. Ms. van Dan,
Ms. Hughes or Mr. Kondrick)
IMembers Absent: Mr. Oquist
+Dthers Present: Jerrold Boardman, ' y Planner
Bill Rogers, 3126 - Ave. Nc,, Anoka
Don Bene, 5830 Monroe . N.E.
Dan Cook, 1623 Brenner P s N.E.
Frank & Lois Olson, 5431 W t Brenner Pass N.E.
� Bob & Gayle Werner, 1639 Bre er Pass N.E.
Vince Forystek, 1301 S.E. 6th t.
Dennis Schneider,_City Councilm
,APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 18, 1981, PLANNING CON�IISSION
,MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO APPROVE
.PLANNING COMMISSIDN MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
ES:
�UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRiS DECLARED
�UNANIMOUSLY.
NOVEMBER 18, 1981,
MOTION CARRIED
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #81-04, BY
BURBAN ENGINEERING, INC., INNSBR CK NO'RTH 0 N OUSES PLA 7: or
�arre Farr Corporation, eing a replat of Bloc s 1, 3, 4 an 5, and Lot 1,
Block 10, Innsbruck North Townhouses Plat 5, because the construction
didn't follow the lot lines as platted, generally located north of I.694
between West Bavarian Pass and West Brenner Pass N.E.
.MOTION BY MS. HUGHES� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON
p.S. #81-04 BY SUBURBAN ENGINEERING� INC.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HRRRIS DECLARED Th1E PUBLIC AEARING
OPEN AT 7:45 P.M.
Mr. Boardman stated this is a replat of Plat 5. Because the structures that
were built did not necessarily fall within the plat line, they are now getting
the structures and plat lines all lined up. This type of thing happens quite
often where the plat is actua7ly the building itself. He stated Mr. Rogers from
Suburban Engineering was in the audience to answer any questions.
�
. ,, .
. r_ _ , _
�
�
� . .
1�
�i
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1981 PAGE 2
Mr. Rogers stated that, as Mr. Boardman had explained, when the building was
built, they overstaked the bualding line so that the plat lines and the
building lines do not line up, so this is just a request for a replat.
Mr. Dan Cook, 1623 Brenner Pass N.E., stated he owns Lots 3 and 11, which is
Block 3 of Plat 5. He asked what affect the replat would have on the member-
ship in the Townhouse Association. This is creating a new Plat 7 which is not
officially recognized in the bylaws of the Association as being a part of the
Association. By creating a new plat, are all the people involved in Plat 7
no longer a part of the Association?
' Mr. Rogers stated he could address that question. He stated he had heard that
Mr. Farr and the County want to change it back to a replat of P3at 5. They
would not call it Plat 7. It would be ca7led Innsbruch North Replat 5, so
that would take care of Mr. Cook's concern.
Mr. Cook asked what affect the replat would have on everyone as far as the
cost to individual homeowners, such as filing fees, surveys, abstracts, title
insurance on the houses, etc. It was his concern�that the homeowners not get
stuck with any fees.
Mr. Boardman stated that as far as he knew, all this is being handled by Mr. Farr.
However, he suggested Mr. Cook get in touch with Mr. Farr to clarify that.
Mr. Cook stated it would be nice to have something in writing from the Farr
Corporation that says they will bear the entire cost of this.
Mr. Harris stated that could be a stipulation on the recommendation of the
replat.
Mr. Frank O7son, 543] West Brenner Pass N.E., stated their garage is a foot off,
so that will probably be considered when it is resurveyed. He stated that when
they bought their house, the banker suggested they hold some money back in
escrow, because they may have trouble selling the house. He asked if the home-
owners will be notified when this matter is cleared up so they can give Mr. Farr
the money. . �
Mr. Boardman suggested the homeowners keep in touch with Mr. Farr. Once this
passes the City of Fridley, the Darrel Farr Corporation will be responsible for
recording the replat at the County, and the City does not know when that is
recorded. •,
MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY JNS. GABEL� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON
P.S. #81-04 BY SUBURBAN ENGINEERING.
UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTINC AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING
CIASED AT 7:52 P.M. --
,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1981 PAGE 3
MUTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO RECOMMEND TD CITY COUNCIL THE
APPROVAL OF TXE CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. �81-04� BY SUBURBAN
ENGZNEERING, INC.� INNSBRUCK NORTH TOWNHDUSES REPLAT S�FOR DARREL FARR CORPORA-
TION; BEING A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 1� 3� 4 AND 5� AND LOT 1� BLOCK 10� INNSBRUCK
NORTH TOWNHOUSES PLAT 5� BECAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION DID NOT FDLLOW THE LOT LINES
AS PLATTED, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTX OF I.694 BETWEEN WEST BAVARIAN PASS AND
WEST BRENNER PASS N.E.� WITH THE STIPULATION THAT ALL THE EXPENSES INCURRED
BE BORN BY THE DARREL FARR CORPORATION.
UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMDUSLY.
Mr. Harris stated that P.S. #81-04 would go to City Council on Jan. 11. He
recommended that �11 interested parties be in attendance at that meeting,
2. DIS SION OF INTENT TO CREATE A CONVERSION CONDOMINIUM AT 1601 NORTH
INNSBR K DRIVE:
Mr. Boardman s ted that the Darrel Farr Corporation has withdrawn their appli-
cation for a lic se to create a conversion condominium.
Ms. Gabel stated thi is just the beginning, and she felt that now was the time
for the City to undert e a study to determine what the renta7 market is in the
City. � /
1NOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECON E BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECOMINEND TO CITY COUNCIL TXAT
THE CITY UNDERTAKE A STUDY O TERMIN$jTHE AVAILABILITY OF RENTAL HOUSING IN
TH£ CITY AND 80W CONDOMINIUM ON RS19N MIGHT AFFECT IT.
Ms. Gabel stated she felt that�
to be on the people who cannot a
Ms. Hughes stated it seemed
some people can own a house
thing they will want to enc
apartments out of the low a
low and moderate income ren
of rental property that is�
to
in
1C
does not know what the impact is going
buy houses. Where are they going to go?
at co o conversion may be the only way
r futu In that case, it may be some-
�ay�. __n ersion � uld certainly take some potential
moderate 'ncome re al, if indeed the units are
1, She tholtght they ve to encourage the saving
r low and moderate inco s.
Mr. Harris stated there a�e some definite aavantages to ndo conversion, even
though most people look at the negative side. He stated i is probably the only
way some low and moderate income people are going to be able o afford a housing
unit, if it is a reasonable cost. From the City's standpoint, here are some
advantages built into owner-occupied units. People who own thei own unit
usually have more pride, and there would probably be less problems s far as
vandalism and some of the other problems that go along with apartmen complexes.
There is generally also a higher tax base.
Ms. Hughes stated it is not only just families involved, there are also si le
adults who cannot afford to buy houses.
TME GIT'Y OF
/
►
FA�a� Y
DIRECTORATE
OP
PUBLtC WORKS
DATE �)anuary 13, 1982
ROM .PW Bill Deblon - Planning Z✓, - -
UBJECT
Repla�t of Innsbruck North Townhouse Plat 5
1 D_ _ �
00
�
°ci o
MEMORANDUM
MEMO N0. 82-04
TO
John Flora
ACTION INFO•
X
I have been in contact with various representatives affected by the above mentioned
matter in regard to cost. As of yet, I haven't been informed of the exact dollar
figure. The process and affiliated costs that have been discussed are revealed
below:
Platting Procedure Cost
Appl i cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $500.00
Dedication - Requires signatures of all owners and mortgage , ry/A
companies, plus notorized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Approval for filing - Requires signatures by Mayor and City Clerk .. None
Hard Shell - approximately 4 . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . $300 to $400
County Approval
Per P1 at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $80.00
Pl us $5. 00 per 1 ot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $150.00
Cost to Townhouse Residents
Titles re-done and filed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
By-laws changed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N/A
.1
I have informed Darrel Farr Development Corporation representative of the City's
concern to the residents and to be prepared to address this concern at the January
18, 1982 City Council meeting. In addition, I will continue to pursue this matter
until exact costs can be determined. It should be stipulated that the developer
pay all costs of re-doing the titles and by-laws of the Townhouse residents and
Association.
WSD/de �
_ .. , .
� • -
� - . _ -�_ - - --
i
TME GITY OF
�
�n�l"�L Y
ATE Dec rnb+
ROM D.P.W.
lE
OtRECTORATE o0
�
�F °o 0
MEMORANDUM
pUBLlC WORKS � �
� �
TO
ACTION I INFO•
Innsbruck North Townhouse Final
Checklist Update
' After reviewing our files and field inspection; I have found the fol-
7owing deficiencies in the above mentioned development:
1) Barricade is now a bypass
2) No information oa the Qathway lighting approval by association
3) $2,500 for seal coating W. Bavarian Pass
4) Retaining wall by Fountain Oaks Sign is failing
5) No poured concrete curbing as per letter dated January 9, 1981
6) Berming and/or plantings along westerly property line of Innsbruck
Village and lot 6, Block 1, Innsbruck Nortb. (However, this should
be completed when block 11 Innsbruck Yillage is developed.)
WSD/nh
�
�
_ '
wa R�►ios
/ ♦
N
"- 1Loca�io�n
0
�
�
J
__ �
w,�
_-- PS #81-04
- Innsbruck No. Townhouses
�kPl at �
llu I�— p
ln( ;,,: �
.,.. �
M■
tIM��M t
� �
u
w» ra
1 ANOKA CQ
:.:� IIEM�1 �IN C0.
� �
IIMIE�►OLIS .
SMING L�KE NR[
�-1F
�
� i ��.� �����_ _
;'' � • ��,�
�s���€
�� . c`65 �f���S
r
—ree:. ��7''��'� U �� ��
a ����;
�t��. � � � � �
r
J 'S `�. # �. ���
�
� � , r ?r1� . l `1" ...,.d u..�.�
,.,. �.=,, ' �',J� � ..�..�.,�.,«
^� :: �'�' M"
i � �� " �' y'� ,r: '!, a a. o.eaw `a,
�Eti�.��, � � n'r.�i`.:o�
, �_���
�wr�� C1_ -J� . - �
l ���J��..
��i � � ��\_ )� � ��+![�f�l Ma
. 1� I �� • �O� YM��I[I�l[:�� l
r� '`! �jMt�00p Cf a
es �nfJ I�; � 1 '��
•- n���,�,. � G NE�GNTS
STREET MA.P-CITY OF
FRI DLEY
0 �333 _ 6,666
��of� ; ��e; j� �� , Ps #$�-04 1 �v � �
�. r '' , � � -..9.� +° . , i Innsbruck No. Townhouses � �
,�` . �.�i* :i � ; • �'�P1 at .� � �i
� ��r'A'� l s. � � �
•_�5•� t I> �
. , � 4''to,, � _ _ � ' ~ �
�
��- � � i� �r� S � � r ♦ .�
�. �R•� j � �� �� • i ' ��• � ��
•._ �� r .
��f � . .- ._�,,. .t �•! �� f,e , . s�urar rR�,,�s .
+ � � ..�/� � , , � t�n �aanCw •
.
:� ` \ ;�t ; � � � ' � ,' � �
S,+ , � , 2 �
.. � .
':, ` ' -.. � � � - � r �
�� � 1 � � � . )
� �,S" p � � � � -- _ _ t
r..r�n� - ' .
J
'•. _ � I � I
� `!+~';� � , � .j� .M . � / � �,��y*� : � � �.�
'� l���` . . . . .. - �. s,•,►. .
S `
, ���• , '� .. .. � K'� oRtVE : i , :� ,". '�.
� 1 ��-�,. . � ���/�/�� - INNS UC .
9 �F'� ���' � ��VRTN —�//f �
, ��- .
r � �� i i w q ,� ,,,�
. � -. � � �'+w�iv � , � . + � 'hit -
�, .! . t � �.,
/�f'yr i :��♦ 1+ „v --�x �/ � r _ t i + i �w � . . � '�►.
' v� •� � {t.. � t i � � ' �.� ��• ""
F� '"�� /� � •[� l �� � � � ► � � �y� a�'•r�
� � �i i.t �����+ � �"..�
� ,,�`• ; r'� . . _ • � , -
;J �l j�
� ,�,r�. .�� i t l_ « � •. �...
' 1 ��'►` � � � � ��, �� �� � � �4 ��j�.
� � � s � °; • ► �'",�::
� u5 � ; ; �, ; � �. _ JG ie'� '�' �.
�� �O �s . . �.. � � _ _ .,y ��::;;�
� 9 � .
. ir.i- • ,
,� � � � � . �R � _�� , y� „ �,� �
:'" y :.� � j N '' ! 'X � p s •� ,!� -!� F '� � �� •,•,+� .�
/�`�� t, 7 � M � � " �i . r`� ; i
� • r �� . . , � �� 1 N � r - ���►(
oo ., . . , � � � � _ � �,�
- - -- - - � a � � ao =� - L�i � ��� � �
� � '� q . �,i -1 � � � - _ " � �� � � �' �A6r
1 s "` ��,�` «
►` ��� ; ~ ,� r :��, �SE :� � �� - . .
r � � /� .'. .' � ' "k� c � , - '�,.
�O . �+�..t ' � ' tO1� ' ,� � ��
� � ..
l� �p � I� J ` . � �..•••' .
�jr «T A �' "_ r
F � ' �i ♦ � �
M �11l� tl N /� ;^. ` ovR.el i � _.. _
;''j: r �,•`;1 ' t� �� � .: . a�. ' ��i �
4. ' I7 // , � ' p � �`~� � } �'`• r
� �/ fb•11r I �.
� /N �7 � j .n.`►.•. f:• .. :
X •..,
� � .•ti%�''��� %�* � ' i. � :, r........t..
/I , ';` .r. �
o � � •- f . ,' ' •''�'� ! ' ���'•.
�y. �
N � �'��.�� •'•:V•. - ''• f
,''•'�•' . r•. ��j..
.�` „ .PLA �:: �-t.�::�� . ..�: : : t
" 1�'r� S . �;�� �� � �, �:.:.;::.':::.:::`:..,..:.,:: i w .._
'�° ��� �`��-.
� -' y �t N � ��� . 1' .,.�' ''''�'�' s
� �, p .�•� :::�.�::••.
�i �, _ +'"�`� �� ,".
t � t'�� ���� . ::�#���.�. � ':
, t �`���� ��� �
. N +�'��'� t ��
_: �ta�1�j�:�`�.._ '�•. �����`:
. . �j �..� ,
��- �.s �� � K �+�`�'�'��,::•;�•'C_ .•:::;.'•�:e•�.�:
�` ¢ :.;:: �. .:::::::;• .
,� •..:.. ,.: . :: •s •:,. R)
! - t:`;:•::•. .. . .J
�M • .`IYiJ'iir R� ��•;:•;: ;:'�':• :''•:• : ' �' ',.' ....�•� .
ti �i-��`: :•k'••:••;�51..�:;i••.•• •:'•f•: :'i.:; ' •':;::
/ - �' �;�.�!!!�: ti: ; •.'' •'.•!� .
.. . , �v 'i••'•'''.'••'•`'•''. , .
� ='�--�. . � g �2�• .
,r, �� 4� � • � ��
• - � �1 _
0 1 _ _. � .
��' /�� .. � .. . '.��—� � . . . �
"4' yi-. ♦ 7 ,. . ..^ .�.�. .. . i"��'S:�s..T'i��01C?�_ s 3 ' ��4 . . . : � r ,rc. ... . .
��.� �♦ ���� ' - � . . . . ._ .,__. . .
.
� -
i
+1;'
Notice of Public Hearing
Commercial Development Revenue Bond or Note
� Rice Creek Company Building Project)
A public hearing will be he�ld by the City Council of the
City of Fridley , Minnesota, at the City Aall, 6431 University _
Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota, at 8:00 p.m., November 23,
19t31, for the purpose of considering a proposal that the
City undertake and finance a commercial development project
" in the City. A meeting of the City Council of the City of
Fridley will follow the hearing, at which a resolution giving
preliminary approval to the financing of the project will be
considered.
The project, proposed to be operated by Rice Creek Company
3uilding constitutes the acquisition of land within
the City, acquisition and construction of a building thereon
and acquisition and installation of equipment therefor to be
used as a commercial office building facility. The esti-
�mated principal amount of the obligations proposed to be
issued by the City is $1 ,100,000. A� draf t copy of the pro-
;posed application to the Commissioner of Securities of the
�State of Minnesota, together with all attachmen�s and ex-
lhibits thereto, will be available for public inspection at
�the City Hall during regular office hours.
DATED October 26, 1981
SIDNEY C. INMAN, CITY CLERK
Publish: November 4, 1981
0
2
�
� ' 3
• '.� �,�, r' ' •
AN O�INANCE TO AMEND THE CITX CODE OF TFiE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MARING A CHANGE IN ZONING
DSSI�tIG'I'S.
The Council of the City of Fridley cb ordain as follaws:
S�CTIOiN l. Appendix D of the City Code of Fric7ley is amended as
hereinafter indicated.
S�CTIOiN 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of
Fridley and described as:
Part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25 (Parcel 1100)
lying in the South Half of Section 24, T-30, R-24, City of
Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota.
Is hereby desic,�ated to be in the Zoned District known as C�1
(general offioe and limited business).
S�CTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the
-- official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned
fram Zaned District 1�-3 (general multiple family dwellings) to
Cl�l (general offioe and limited business).
pp,ggED p,1�ID p,DpPTID BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DiAY OF
, i9si.
zoA #so—oa
AZTFST:
SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLF�RFC
WILLIAM J. I�E - MAYOR
Public Hearing: Septesnber 15, 1980
Reopened Public Hearing: May 4, 1981
First Reading: 9S'�.OhPr 19, 1981
Second Reading:
Publish:
a�n� rx�.
AN p1�II��E AI��DIl� (�PTER 11, SDCTION 11.10, OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CODE RELATING TO FEES (CONVBRSION
�AD�iII�II�LS)
�iE O�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEi' DOF� ORDiP,IN AS FOLT�WS:
QiAPTER 11, SDCTION 11.10 FEFS
Section 11.10 of the City Code shall be amendec7 by adding the follaaing:
Code # Subject Fee
217a Conversion CondaminitIIn (a) 2 Ownership Units $500
(one time fee) (b) 3 to 7 Ownership Units $750
(c) 8 to 12 Ownership Units $1,000
(d) Over 12 Units $1,000
plus $20.00 per unit for
every unit over 12
217b Conaosniniim► (a) 2 to 4 Ownership Units $20
(annual fee) (b) 5 to 12 Ownership Units $30
(c) 13 to 24 Ownership Units $40
(d) Over 24 Ownership Units $50
PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS UAY OF
, 1981
ATTF�T:
SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLERK
First Reading: ,
Second Reading: '
Publish:
r�
�
� .
,
�
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR �
,
4
• ... � � .. �y . ._ . . . . . . +v:. .-�,.... -
-:-----------
TME GIT\' OF
.,. r
FRit�l� Y
ATE
ROM
�
DIRECTORATE
OF
PUE3LIC WORKS
,� TO
John Flora
Condomi ni um at 6500, 6510, 6520 '�" " F�' ��-�
2nd Street N.E.
4A
M EMO R A N D UM
��
ACTION� INFO•
On Thursday, January 7, 1982 we received a registered plat for the above
mentioned condominium. Apparently, the developer as well as �he County did
not have any knowledge of the City's ordinance requiring licensing of conver-
sion condominiums. The developer will be notified of the ordinance and re-
quired to obtain a license. Also a copy of our Conversion Condominium Or-
dinance was sent to the County and they were requested not to register other
conversions until the developer complys with our licensing pr�cedure.
Upon closer inspection of the City's conversion cond�minium ordinance,
I have found actions necessary to make the City's.legislative intent regard-
ix�g condominiums clear. Those actions are as follows:
1. Amend either Chapter 220 "Housing Maintenance Code" to include a con-
� cise provision requiring condominiums to obtain an annual license, or
amend Chapter 217 "Conversion Condominium" to include a clear pro-
vision requiring an annual license.
2. Establish a one time license fee for converting a multiple dwelling
into a condominium. � �
3. Establish a license fee for annual inspection of common areas of a
condominium.
Attached are fee schedules that the Ci�.ty Council may want to consider.
WSD/nh
�
The fee schedule listed below is a one time fee at the time of conversion.
4B
Cc►de � Su, bject Fee
217a Conversion Condominium (a) 2 Ownership Units $500
(one-time fee) (b) 3 to 7 Ownership Units $750
(C) 8 to 12 Ownership Units $1000
(d) Over 12 Units $1000
plus $20.00 per Unit
for every Unit over 12
The fee schedule listed below in an annual fee which covers the cost of in-
s��ecting only the common areas of a converted or newly built condoninium.
Code # Subject Fee
2'17b Condominium (a) 2 to 4 Ownership Units $20
(Annual fee) (b) 5 to 12 Ownership Units $� 3 c
= (c) 13 to 24 Ownership Units �40
(d) Over 24 Units �50
r
�
TME
�
DATE
FROM
SUBJECT
,
�
OF
DIRECTORATE
OF
PUBLIC WORKS
January 13, 1982
John G. fl�ra, Public Works Dir.
SP #81-10
Suburban Homes �
TO
5_►
MEMORANDUM
ACTIONI INFO.
At the Planning Commission meeting of November 4, 1981, a hearing was
held on the special use permit, SP #81-10, Suburban Homes, Inc., a
mobile home sales lot on Highw�y No. 65.
The Planning Comnission identified five stipulations with the recommenda-
tion of approval by the City Council. I have talked to Mike and Georgia
Goulet, operators of Suburban H��es, Inc., and Mr. Jack Maxwell, owner of
the property, about the five stipulat�ons.
1. They have stated that the rear area of the lot has been cleaned up.
2. Screening of the refuse container and propane tank will be accomplished
this spring.
3. Maintenance of the hard surfaced area wi11 be accomplished.
4. Location and improvement of the existing drainage system will be ini-
tiated this spring.
5. Mr. Maxwell and Dave Harris have agreed to erect a privacy fence along
the north property line when this area is developed.
Mr. Maxwell will not be able to be present at the January 18, 1982 City
Council meeting. He has indicated he will submit a letter identifying
his plans to comply with and satisfy the five stipulations. _
JGF:ijk
' '
. - __—
� - ..
� - _ . ,_ .. . .
� _
I
, _ .
� ,
5A
CI7Y OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 4, 1981 �
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman rris called the November 4, 1981, Planning Commission meeting to
order at 7: p.m.
ROLL CAIt:
Members Present: Mr. Harris, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Kondrick,
. van Dan, Mr. Saba (arr. 7:45 p.m.)
Members Absent: N
Others Present: Jerrol Boardman, City Planner
Jack Ma ell, 3205 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony
Dave Har 's, 470 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E.
Ralph Virg lls, 8298 University Ave. N.E. (Raffaele's Supper Club)
Bruce Hay, North 0akes Road, St. Paul, MN 55110
APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 16, 19$1, PLIQNNI
MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITT
SSION MINUTES:
� TD APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 16� 1982�
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIR NARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION C.�ZRIED
UNANIINDUSLY.
1. TABLED SEPTEMBER 15, 1981; PUBLIC HEARIN • CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSEO
PRELI'M'INARY PLAT, P,S.�1-03, OAK ESTATES, BY RON C RISTIANSON: Being a
rep at of Lots 5, 6, an 7, Lucia Lane Addit'on, generally located in the
Northeast corner of Highway #65 N.E. and Miss sippi Street N.E.
Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Christianson has verbally re ested that this item be
withdrawn as he cannot put the package together with t e landowner.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #81-10, BY SUBURBAN HOMES, INC.:
Per Fridley City Code, Section 205.102, 3, N� to continue a mobile home
sales lot, under new op�ration, on the Westerly 600 feet of the Southerly
320 feet of the Northerly 750 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the North-
west Quarter of Section 12, the same being 7625 Viron Road N.E.
1►lOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON
SP #BI-10 BY SUBURBAN HOMES, INC.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN XARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING
OPENED AT 7:35 P.M.
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 4 1981 PAGE 2
i
Mr. Boardman stated this special use permit is being brought back to the Planning
Commission because of the change of operation on the property. In the April 6, 1977,
Planning Commission minutes, it stated that a special use permit was granted for
a�period of three years. Mr. Boardman stated this period was up last year, but
with the change in operation, he wanted to bring it back to the Planning
Cor�nission. He stated City Staff has looked at the site, and there are some
problems that need correcting: clean-up at the back of the property, screening
of an LP tank, screening of the refuse container, maintenance of the hard surface
area, and maintaining parking 5 ft. off the structure.
Mr. Boardman stated that, generally, the special use permit has been complied
with, but there are some things that Staff found were not in compliance. One
was that the parking lot was not striped, and according to the landscaping plan,
there was a requirement for ]andscaping down the side at the time the permit
was approved, and that has not been done.
Mr. Boardman stated the new operator is in the audience if there are any
questions.
=- Mr. Bruce Hay, . 39 North Oakes Rd., St. Paul, stated he is one of the operators
of the operation, Suburban Homes, Inc., which is now leasing the lot from
� Mr. Jack Maxwell, who is the owner of the property. He stated they are licensed
under the State of Minnesota as a mobile home dealer and ]ease and operate a
mobile home sales lot on Mr. Maxwell's property.
Mr. Harris asked Mr. Maxwell if he was aware of the stipulations placed on the
special use permit back in 1977.•
Mr. Jack Maxwell, 3205 Silver Lake Road, stated he was not aware of the screening,
but he was aware of the landscaping. He stated that prtor to the time of the
approval of the special use permit, a�nember of the City Staff came out and
looked at the property and said the landscaping had not been done because it was
supposed to be greenery and crushed rock had been placed instead. There was a
discussion at that point that the crushed rock was there primarily because they
bring mobile homes through there, and greenery would �ave to be continually
replaced, while the crushed rock can be put back to good appearance with a mini-
mum of expense. At that time, the city inspectors said that the crushed rock
was very attractive and was done in a high, pleasing manner. Mr. Maxwell stated
they have attempted to keep,it that way. He stated he could not speak for the
trash in the back as he has�not been back there.
Mr. Hay stated that as leasees of the lot, they feel it is probably one of
the most attractive lots, as it now stands, in the whole City of Minneapolis.
It is well landscaped, has a nice sign, and they are very happy with it.
Mr. Boardman stated he has no problem with the front landscaping. but in the
landscaping plan submitted to the City, it showed screening down the side,
which has not been done.
(Mr. Saba arrived at 7:45 p.m.)
�
5C
PLANNING CONPIISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 4, 1981 _ __PAGE 3
'r
Mr. Dave Harris, 470 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E., stated he knows both Mr. Maxwell
and Mr. Hague quite we11. He stated Mr. Maxwell has always tried to maintain
a nice attractive sales lot. As the adjoining property owner, he is convinced
that Suburban Homes, Inc., will continue to run a good sales lot.
Mr. Boardman stated he is concerned about the stipulations he had mentioned
earlier. He has had a complaint from Strite-Anderson about the garbage in
the back of the lot.
MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY:1N12. KONDRICK, TD CLOSE ?'HE PUBLIC HEARING ON
SP #81-10 BY SUBURBAN HOMES, INC.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSED AT 7:47 P.M.
Mr. Dave Harris stated that, as he had mentioned �arlier, as the adjoining
property owner to the north, he has no problems with the mobile home sales lot
as it is now, but he felt it might eliminate some problems later on when
the property is developed to the north if some type of screening fence would be
put in along the north boundary of the lot. He stated that if this is a stipu-
lation in the approval of the special use permit, he would be willing to share
equally in the cost of that fence. �
Mr. Boardman Stated that in a discussion with Strite-Anderson, they have expressed
concern because some filling has been done in the back of Mr. Maxwell's lot.
This filling has created some run-off problems. They indicated there is a drainage
system along the northern part of Strite-Anderson, and there is supposed to be a
catch basin, but that catch basin has been filled over causing some drainage
problems in the back area. Mr. Boardman stated this drainage problem and a
so7ution should be discussed an'd worked out with the City Engineer before the
special use permit goes to City Council.
MOTION BY MR. UIST SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECOMINEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #BI-10� BY SUBURBAN HOMES, INC.: PER FRIDLEY
CITY CODE, SECTION 205�102, 3, N, TO CONTINUE A MOBILE FIOME SALES LO� UNDER
NEW OPERATION, ON TNE WL'STERLY 600 FEET OF TNE SOUTHERLY 320 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY
750 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, THE
SAME BEING 7625 VIRON ROAD N.E., WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: _
f 1. THE REAR AREA OF THE LOT BE CLEANED UP.
2. SCREENING BE PROVIDED FOR TXE REFUSE CONTAINER AND THE PROPANE TANK.
3. MAINTENANCE OF NARD SURFACE AREAS. •
4. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BE RESOLVED WITX THE CITY ENGZNEER PRIOR TO
THE CITY COUNCIL :'NIEETING ON THIS ITEM.
5. BQTH PROPERTY OWNERS SHARE EQUALLY IN THE ERECTION OF A FENCE AT
THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY TO TNE NORTX.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. '
/ ♦
N
`,- . .:..�
COpN RAP�DS \ � • ��
, � ' .»:�:...
�"��\ �'
(.. �.)
�
W
f
u
_
�
� ��
i
� Q � �.0 s
� r� _II
Du.ne�
I�IaM
�
� � � •
Z Z
• ,
�
: �,
_. ..�
. �! .•..
�.,�
�n
I
SP #81-10 Suburban Homes, Inc. �
�COCqT/ON
�\ $PqING L�KE PMK
�JI..Q�.!J�UUI�L�I .� 3� ��...��
� r� !-1 "^ �'��'�
,� � �U �� '�-��;,�
��l _, / �� �a,w� 'I� i� � w hi..
I , rx• 1� :�uLL'�
„•�T•4. �� I V..wr.l J�
�i s7 �� , � , cwn—!� �
� �� ���
� �,.:....,
f���.����L��' �o I"�� �
� ,.
L � Y �
�J � � , e s
!I �� ;
� �' W
_ ! I �N
p 11 �
�I �' r .a•°I++ �1
` - �-- - +� 'ly� � ,. �`
- � - � ..;�; �L� !L
� ��i��n� � �
, sZ�+ �
N Y
� lY��lM t
N � 1� �.".. r �
� ` L -�
► - - �
� ;� �
_
_ «.
i, .,. ��.�... _
j � �-- ��
� �
- � ' --
�
_ _ __ � � ,� -
' ,1 �Nac• ea
- ` /� - 1 . Nc�. ri� eo.
��
_ - ��rais
��;��1��Ji .�� �I II ����I�J���- -
' #:�°�I�:��J � � �- ��i
�5 � ��i� I €
�� `'-` J�_x
: c �� �� �r��� .�C �
l rs�� 7� �f' J 1'_
j i 11 I . ��4��■ !Ii�, W
f ( ��: LIN �C �I � _
x
�;$M�� ,,�� a � �'r
� �~. , ,��' � =u
�� �_ ;
n 4� I
�.... `sJ � —l�_. • �
��%.. ...� �^^J� � ..,���.�
r—, �'j,, iMer il� �.�. w.[�u0.
6� � � ��p�. r,� �. >;.��:�:
�' �� ���`�' �.��..,.��
��,.�,.....�
�,--�-
�� � �� � �
... t -p v..— . ir=c ' �,
r
��� Y �; f-��' �; ����. � o� ;a:�:�::
;.':: +���`�'�`�U�� �w:.�r.
�- = ��
.�e,.... b' �'�%��fl�l��� �—1
Cp�UM91� � 4 ME16NT5
STREET MA.P•CITY OF
FRI DLEY
p a333 6,666
1
�,, o � 7S
�
,
SP #t31-lU - Juuur ua��
•♦ � � ��v• �� _ _ — M
s��=��no` CITY LIMITS�
Ciio%L Hi�ron � p F F R i D L E Y
�
h
=�o
�=sso� .
� �yli/iv�! 6. Os�r�t%
� �
,,��- -����������������������fiii�������i�n��������iiii
��
� SUB�IRBAP! I��oe�� � Inc � •
lo
;" sP. al-�o
i-- - �--- --- 600 _ - -
�, .
� 9.`._ � .
,
� ��2�='� j�
� 3 �
0
`2��. I
�
�N
\ �
�
p2o.t� ��"'
a, aa as:s
' ,r• r�.,• 3� So
r• �o
� : �.. ro
���� o .
I '�
A �1lDER�Q�1l �.
��. ---- '
Zoo z�a�o__.-- - �
�
a70.20 N
• M
,�✓Bp% �
�
' o
�� 4 0 ;
N °
�z 4 D� I � � •
.
5 1 _Zo, �
r
{26so� : DFV�LOP1VlENT ; , �
� /L!i/f'onGO�iiinetta�'N. D Goed �
� �
. ,
� � . �6
�; , yo
�.a` ....
. .i-..�i������������t�/���/I�������t/t���t����t���������Fr_..•
■F
' 1 � � (L�tO)
'' � ' I Ov Rea/>y Ga"�• �G�
� W fAs.
' n
��
I
i,
k
� ig 2Gs'Di
�� coo
� �� , i
Z �� �zeso�
Q1 3� - � —�0-'° — — —
-------� ---- ', — _ ��-- — –:�..- _ �
_ � o'� (436�� � �2�s��
� I �� c�,vi�E �
�� To66�!��
� '•�� � — —
� i ._ _�
I �'• (4�f4)
i
Y� N'6U0�
� 'o
Z �N
� �
. �� io
�
. � I ;v 1 h £00 - � - : 6E
7�
. ' �! '.� . . . - . ,I � _ .
�i i � - - '
�„� � I - I
.�• So
sJ„
v�o.zo . -- • ;.
"s"o:ey
�
�
.4..
rL7io1 ^ `
►/irao Reu/.`1'� /n�t. . ,�.Y,
• • H� ..
;
. c, :
/,�yal
(4?DO)
�:/fa� G. Ovimeffe �f/0600d
� .. .
I -
�t
�
�
-"�y�.�
�s
��
�r,
.
�
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING CONdr1ISSI0N MEETING, JANUARY 6, 1982
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Harris called the January 6, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to
order at 7:33 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Mr. Harris, Mr. Saba, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Erickson (for Mr. Svanda),
Mr. Oquist, Mr. Kondrick, Ms. van Dan
Members Absent: done
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner
Don Hanson, representing Servomation, 7490 Central Ave. N.E.
APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 9, 1981, PLANNING CONG�IISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY lHR. SABA� TD APPROVE THE DECEMBER 9� 1981�
PLANNING COMMISSION 1NINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANZMOUSLY.
1. RE UEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #81-08, BY SERVOMATION CORPORATION: Split
off t e East 263.96 feet of t e North 330 feet of t e SE /4 of the
NW 1/4 of Section 12, T-30, R-24, subject to the South 25 feet taken for
74th Avenue N.E. (Fireside Drive) so the property can be sold, the same
being 1201 Fireside Drive N.E.
Mr. Harris stated this was not an official public hearing, but they would
handle it as an informal public hearing.
Mr. Boardman stated Servomation built a building on this property 2-3 years
ago. The back portion of this lot is presently vacant. Servomation is requesting
a lot split on the westerly portion of their property. That lot split entails
1.85 acres. It is zoned M-1, so it is adequate size for that type of zoning.
Mr. Boardman stated Staff has no problems with the lot split, except they would
require a 20 ft. road/utility easement along the south portion of the whole
property. The primary reason for this easement is there is no sewer and water
available to that lot, and they would want that availability for sewer and water
to the lot. There is no water in Fireside, and they would have to come in off
Old Central with a water line. Right now they only have a 50 ft. right-of-way
for road in there, and they wouldn't have enough room for water lines. That is
. . . . ;
_ _ _ -. : . � -
,
, _ ,, . .
6�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY b, 1982 PAGE 2
the reason for an additional 20 ft. easement, Also, another reason is that,
at some point in time, the City may want to put in a turn lane on Fireside.
Mr. Boardman stated that Engineering would also require an easement on the
25 ft. triangle on the corner of Fireside and Old Central. They have been
picking up these triangles on all lots for expansion of radiuses.
Mr. Harris stated that with the existing 50 ft. of road right-of-way and with
an additional 20 ft. road/utility easement, that was 70 ft, of right-of-way,
and that was pretty wide. Normally, the City doesn't go with anything over
66 ft. If, in the future, the City does put in a turn lane, they would be
cutting into the property owner's landscaping, which the City requires the
property owner to put in.
Mr. Boardman stated he personally did not see that happening in the near future.
This area would have to develop pretty heavily to warrant that kind of development.
He stated he felt the City would probably be satisfied with a total of 66 ft.,
instead of 70 ft. -
Mr. Harris suggested that Mr. Hanson consult his legal counsel regarding the
park fee on the roadlutility easement.
MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO REC�MMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT� L.S. #BI-08� EY SERVOMATION CORPORATION,
TO SPLIT OFF TXE EAST 263.96 FEET OF THE NORTH 330 FEET OF TXE SE 1/4 OF THE
NW Z/4 OF SECTION 12� T-30, R-24, SUBJECT TO THE SOUTX 25 FEET TAKEN FOR
74TH AVENUE N.E. (FIRESIDE DRIVE) SO THE PROPERTY CAN BE SOLD, THE SAME BEING
1201 FIRESIDE DRIVE N.E., WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
1. THAT A 16 FT. ROAD/UTILITY EASEMENT BE RETAINED TO THE SOUTH
2. THAT A 25 FT. 2'RIANGLE EASEMENT BE RETAINED ON THE CORNER OF OLD CENTRAL
AND FIRESIDE DRIVE
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN XARRIS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Harris stated that L.S. #81-08 would go to City Council on Feb. 1. He
recommended that all interested parties be in attendance at that meeting.
2. RECEIVE NOVEMBER 24, 1981, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY I�Z. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE THE NOVEMBER 24, 1981�
__-____.._..
ENERGY COMINISSION MINUTES. �' .
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
3. RECEIVE DECEMBER 1, 1981, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECEIVE THE DECEMBER 1, 1981,
PARKS � RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. _ _
0
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 6 1982 PAGE 3
Ms. Gabel stated she had read the information about the proposed recreation
building in the winter program brochure recently mailed out. She expressed
concern about the high membership fees.
Mr. Kondrick stated the dollars talked about are rough estimates. The dollars
charged are less dollars than would be charged for membership in another type
of facility. A little less money is being charged right now at the Brooklyn
Center community center. However, a lot of the monies at Brooklyn Center
come f rom the day-by-day charges for use of the pool, sauna, etc. He stated
the fees were of concern to the Parks & Recreation Comnission and to many people.
One thing that is going to be attractive is that memberships will probably be
offered for a 3-month period, a 6-month period, etc., as opposed to a one lump
sum.
Mr. Saba suggested that the membership fees be broken down; for example, a
membership fee for use of the racquet ba71 courts, a membership fee for use of
the swimning pool, etc.
Ms. Gabel stated she was concerned that the way the information was presented in
the brochure, people are going to say they cannot afford the $200 yearly member-
'� ship and therefore will vote against the building. It was not explained in the
brochure that there were several alternatives to the yearly membership, and she
did not feel the brochure was put together very well.
Mr. Harris stated that if the thinking was along the lines that so many member-
ships at $200 were needed to defray the expenses on the maintenance, maybe some-
one should rethink the budget on the maintenance. What bothered him was how this
$200 figure was arrived at.
Mr, Saba stated this whole building should be self-sufficient in every way
possible. He knew it was probably not going to be, but it should be aimed in
that direction. To take one activity and have that activity subsidize a lot of
other activities that are seldom going ta be used or possibly not used at all
is not fair. For example, if he bought a membership to use the swimming pool,
he is also subsidizing, for example, the auditorium which he may never use.
Mr. Harris asked if the recreation building doesn't go, did the recreation
building project committee look at any other facilities in District #14, such
as the junior high school?
Mr. Kandrick stated that, yes, the project committee had looked at all other
areas. Representatives from al] the schools came and spoke to the committee on
what possibly could or could not be done.
Mr. Harris asked that if the recreation building is voted down, is there any
possibility that a community center could be worked out for the junior high
facility, keeping in mind that the facility might be closed for school use?
Mr. Kondrick stated that possibility was talked about, and it would appear that
_ it would cost a great deal of money to refurbish the building to make it the
type of building that is required with the same type of services as the new
facility. � _ "
6C
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 6, 1982 PAGE 4
Mr. Oquist stated maybe the City will have to rethink what is really required,
What is really needed in this community?
Mr. Harris stated that if the recreation building does not go, they may have to
take less than they really want.
Mr. Kondrick stated it isn't a question of the building and what is contained in
the building as far as requirements. After extensive research, the project
committee recommended those things they felt were really needed in the community.
Even if they had access to one of the schools, the cost of refurbishing it is
astronomical� in addition to the fact that the new building will be much more
energy efficient than the old building, so a lot of those things have been
considered. As far as sacrificing and dropping into a lesser situation, that is
always possible if the people decide they do not want this new facility at this
point in time.
Mr. Harris stated that District 14 (under5tanding that District 14 is only part
of the City) has severe financial problems, and-ehere is the possibility that
one of the solutions is to have a referendum to increase the millage. That is
why he brought this up and they may be asking the electorate for two levies instead
of one.
Ms. van Dan stated that one of the big things was that the seniors had requested
a senior citizen room in the new fG�ility. Now, there is a senior drop-in center
at Parkview. Is that going to make ��y difference in the new facility?
Mr. Kondrick stated he did not feel it was going to make a big difference. He
_ stated the Commission has spent a lot of time talking about the seniors' needs.
�He felt the senior drop-in center at Parkview was a good thing, but they still
plan on having a room in the new facility for the seniors that they can use most
of the time, keeping in mind that this room would also be accessible to other
groups of people.
Mr. Erickson stated he thought the City should take a good close look at the
need for racquet ball courts in the new facility, because of the fact that
private industry seems to be meeting that need. They are expensive to play and
expensive to maintain.
Mr, Kondrick thanked the Commission members for their suggestions and concerns.
He stated there are quite a few meetings planned in January and February to get
information out to the peop]e, and an informational discussion will be shown on
cable TV.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MINUTES RECEIVED.
4. RECEIVE DECEMBER 3, 1981, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTIDN BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO RECEIVE THE DECEMBER 3� 1981�
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. -:_
�
1
_ �.
6D
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 6, 1982 PAGE 5
Ms. van Dan stated the CAP Agency had many programs planned and excellent plans
for 1980-81-82 and into 1983. As a result of the cutbacks, the Human Resources
Commission feels they will probably be getting a lot more funding requests from
each of the individual cities. That is why, in reviewing their funding guide-
lines. she would like �to change it a little and weigh the requests a little
differently so they are definitely sure a high percentage of Frid7ey residents
are receiving the services and that it is all non-profit and not any private
sector groups, as they have had in the past. She wanted to make this canment
so the Planning Commission knew why the Human Resources Corr�nission was re-reviewing
their funding guidelines.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.,
5. RECEIVE DECEMBER 8, 1981, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECEIVE THE DECEMBER 8� 1981�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIDN MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN XARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
6. RECEIVE DECEMBER 10, 1981, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, 20 RECEIVE THE DECEMBER 10, 19&I,
HDUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. .
7. RECEIVE DECEMBER 15, 1981, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE THE DECEMBER 15� 198Z�
APPEALS COMMISSION MSNUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
8. OTHER BUSINESS:
a.
Pro osed 360-Unit A artment Com lex Adjacent to S rin brook Nature Center
Mr. Kondrick stated that at the Nov. 4, 1981, Planning Commission meeting
the Commission looked at and approved a rezoning request by
Mr. Dave Harris in order to allow the construction of a 360-unit
apartment complex. He stated he wanted to go on record that the Parks &
Recreation Commission was very concerned about a number of things:
0
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 6, 1982 PAGE 6
1. The impact the complex would have on Springbrook Nature Center.
2. The height of the buildings being proposed.
3. Water quality and the levels of water in relationship to
Springbrook Nature Center and what it may or may not mean if
the buildings are built.
4. The possibility of destroying the water recharge system in
this area.
5. The bikeway along the edge of Springbrook Nature Center was a
concern to some of the members of the Parks & Recreation Commission.
Mr. Kondrick stated that when Mr. Harris brought this proposal before
the Planning Commission, these types of things were discussed briefly.
It appeared that those things had been thought about and planned for,
but he asked Mr. Boardman to clarify some of those things.
Mr. Boardman stated they are concerned,not on7y with Mr. Harris'
proposal, but any proposal in that area. Drainage is going to be a
key consideration in the development of the Norfih Area, and that was
the reason for setting up a tax increment district. He stated they
are working closely with Siah St. Clair. City Naturalist. They will
probably be starting some soil borings within the nature center pond
area itself to see what the soil conditions are, to see what they have
to do as far as grading in that area and bringing it into a drainage
retention pond area with dam facilities, etc., in order to satisfy
Mr. St. Clair and the needs of the Springbrook Nature Center. They
are also looking at an overall drainage system and how they are going
to pond and filter that water before it gets to Springbrook.
Mr. Boardman stated that as far as the bikeway, they feel
� probably the best access to get people from South Fridley
the nature center. Their initial plans were for coming up
railroad tracks, but they had problems because they wanted
limited access to the nature center and how did they bring
in from the railroad tracks? So, at this time, they have
thinking and are bringing the bikeway in through the Main
that is
north to
alpng the
to have
the people
changed their
St. area.
Mr. Narris stated that when the Planning Commission looked at
Dave Harris' proposal, he really felt the problems involved with
drainage and that particular type of thing were engineering problems
and were solvable. The one concern that was not brought out at the
Planning Commission meeting was the affect of that many people in
close proximity to �the nature center.
Mr. Kondrick stated that was discussed at the last Parks & Recreation
Commission meeting, and they felt that many people are going to affect
all of Fridley--all of theparks and particularly the nature center.
They did not know the answer for that, but it was definitely a concern.
But, he felt the over-riding concern was the water tables and the
quality of water in Springbrook.
�E
GF
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 6, 1982 PAGE �
Mr. Kondrick stated the Parks & Recreation Commission wil] be happy
to hear that a lot of thought has gone into this.
b. Pro osed Nei hborhoods and Names for Use with Nei hborhood Si n Pro ram
Mr. Boardman stated that at the last meeting, the Planning Comnission
discussed neighborhood signs and the Planning Commission made a
motion recommending that the City run a contest to come up with a new
city logo. He stated the City Council acted on this at their last
meeting. The Council approved the city logo as it is now and did not
want to run a contest for a new logo, they approved the street signs
and logos, and they approved the concept of neighborhoods and neighbor-
hood signs, but they did not like the neighborhood sign itself. Staff
is now working on a redesign of the neighborhood sign. He stated the
City Council suggested the neighborhoods and neighborhood classifications
be sent down to the Community Development Commission for input as to the
names and locations of neighborhoods. If this is all right with the
Planning Cor�nission, this will go to the Corrmunity Deve7opment Commission
at their February meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION BY MR. ERICKSON� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRM.�:�` HARRIS DECLARED THE JANUARY 6� 1982, PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 9:06 P.!►!.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
, ✓X
Y(� E SABA
RECORDING SECRETARY
0
) -
� 1
� ._
�
i
��
eoow ��os
/ \
N
_oc a fian
- - •; � .°�e: �i.� 'i_
I' ..�i��nl ��
�,� ,�,_[ °� �
_ ..�..... �
" � , ���
2
� �; ' � �
: -�
_ = u. w
� �1 7�w � _.
. � _-- �
� � i
. - - �1 f �«au ca
� 1C 1�EM�►IN OD.
� -� - - - _ � . . . . .�� 1 . . .
� � - " - - � � � . - . - yR1EN0US . .
LS #81-08
120 Fireside Dro
Servomation Corp.
SNlING L�KE MIIII
�
- �:��- ..o..�..�.,..
::� :'�"
��F 1� I �� r > ., A.:..,.
`.y� �'� { �.:...,^e°
—���. �.
I j"'��'���--'
1 .. �...� �..
�I�. �,�,��+,"�,-, yt;l ioYM.::H.
nn�i��'�,_%� u,...e«r.
{i ��
�pLyYSU � G NEIGMTS
STREET Iht1AP-CITY OF
FRI DLEY
O-- 3:333 6,666
6G
u .�
'• 7iTi { � . T 7
- -- - � LS #81-08 � �;+a' � � � . j •• : ,.. . � , �—T r � -�
120 Fi resi de Dr. � � �+''�'''" " 13�� !�x � � f' 'f'
1�! •
Servomation Corp. ; 4 � �� , � �sl = '•� � -;` _ �' " 9..:� �
<< -� �� �t s � . �°_ � g ,,�:� � '' .�1% y - �
` � S ,� �_ : ,.e _ � • � 0 ���s �: t3�� �i t3Ts
' �G�� � ` , 4 �, ` �, �,` 2 c
. . .
., s � . �
�- = Q lf:a� ' '.. .i� r. .��.
i._ Q ii/T^ ;: _tit'• . � ',� '`4
� DE VEL OPMEN T � '"' � � �� � � � ' ` � �` `
Z � W �.��f_ � �- .� ,r �•
. ,,
„� 3i ' s�e, _ � ��'oa' �i3��3E; "'" , i�4i : i
� , . '.
� « 7600 : �� : '���� ,. .. � .^��;
,� �e .r.:.u�� i� n��� � •':!.i ic s� �
� f' 1� -. : ii' !Y ♦ '. i . �� •
'�' ��V � /� 1
�se. , .ti' e � ' • � -,,rl�s� �76 T.� a��4 Ii�1
t '
' :s: ���O�It .j�q�� �8=! 3i'13�� ;.i�,
��fa � •M�A�6��'.:� �a�P
rr Lr�' fG % �, �% �Sd� � ' � w n+ r_
sw. (z�,�J `�► _,� . _ .. • ,
�� . u
N.ti+� Re.s.:•r .�r ` y, `�'�e ��13�f� r: 9 3�f j< 61 S
.t• �-/ti,.... � 7 2
d :•.,: .., 3� �{d'�� � � �1'i"
.,
� 3 •� � - ' . '
;` . ., �
%t S� � • 3��`: . . s.. � .s� � �� �
�
� — ; `' �7 � w�� fS't Y f r ��' �� �G� �' t ; �
� � s �� �, y ,t +�.., ��6�E
.
- --' Q- 7S � ����:1�7 j, _ ._� �'.��.
Q, /� � �, ���. " , 13 � I .�,P �
'' ,.,•�� , : t �3� 9 r ' �; � � --� 5 ��
I,o� /1L7'Df . � W :�1�� ���� � ,3 /3� ,� �,�a
� 1 �// � •.�► ,e � ;.,,.,.� 39r '"- � .
�.. ..... ,
� 63.4t �----- �(to. 3 6 a �"k _ �
, , �r .,... n+t�c
_ — .v _ _ _. — •; ,e, :.;.wt,e,r,r,r,.ti;�;� — � • . , !�v II ♦ J�'i� 3r!
I ' :;:�I � v • �'T'r^ � � • J
�, u•s� � � :. � L-t��ol3scti./��o./9gp `►4
� ��� ;19ib ��� i' � �� 'if
L — — — :., . . ; �:� /�avo Y�" fV o
o :•i���.ti�,� /C.-�/1!� / �.7Gce a � / ' -i �4/ f S � � ~ %'i
�Jtii � � �(1 }::{/ *� t �� � " � � .
j r1 , : .i r�r � I
�. � ;�� W ) .+ N s 1 — ��
' �:� �' ` ` T`
� ; . ; �+w (+a' ' h�w � �� .��1'' . '�'� 31''•' - ;
''� '�'� '` � I3S� /3G7 °.,��
;: •::.: � � l�ef ! ?! � 134�� ,� — ' I 3� ,
_t. itiy -- -si:7� � - ---- — - •--- - �
'�� '•� ORIVE -
. �� ;.: FI'�ESI�E ., .,
� ' ' "" j3sp ��GO �3�a �'`
I ��M
%4¢ O � ' 1
I ' `� ,3' � ,
� „�.. �..r ' ti- � .
� i'i tt r A Oi✓oA ���� ���� O �
(i�+�t
! ��dJ4 � �r/i , � � %4'Oi • �� ` i
, ltl� �
� �
� �. Z� j 335- � 13�s !�$! 13
' ' . � I � w f
�
� �
� ;� ' � w �� //��3co % �`iag2 i3�6
. . ` �W � ��M L� fiV � 2 j � 4 f
.iW r� .. d � � �
�
AL {�/Ef�f%� t �' N � ; �, �jcr-gt 'a T'/ li
�4D0/i/0iV � �4io : � ' ' � .,
�� , ,r� N� .... l�. � . �� U �� �/L��N�(�
� 1 c I��pti:
. " - .�r . �i � � ('�+'+�J � � (�l � , t_3.7•
�
-r 360-L�* � � s� i ,�iR �• �,,,��f.
! A„e+•N+ N
� 7 B y � /O / /I /3 :I �! i �7 /B � 7� t► • � e ...
/ • �-
` i s � -!7 7;�_� ' ~ ^� � ` A.�.A!7;
15 t Ol � � ,� . ` '��
�
� ' r-i , -. �_�,
Av E . N . E . � � a � , , 2�i'� •• , ,,.�o.
�,..� ; �. . . .,.,r:�.,�.r��
. ,
� 1981 POLICY STATEMFN7 OP� PARK fEES
ON LAND SUBDIVISION
' Date ��_ �n-B�
� 61
u
In determininq fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for
cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, the following values will be used:
Residential subdivision
�1,000.00 per lot
Residential lot split � 500.00 per lot
Commercial/Industrial subdivision or lot splits � 0.015 per sq. ft. �
This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The
City Council may defer collection to the time a building permit is requested
for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot split.
The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the
applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated.
PARK FEE AGREEMENT
The undersigned understands that accordi�g to the City Plattir►g Ordinance,
the following public park land dedication is required to plat residential,
commercial or industrial zoned property.
It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment
equivalent is at the discretion of {he City. _
It is agreed that a cash payment of �/a07. 9/ h�ill be paid according to the
above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split.
It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the
above stated policy for the follo�ving subdivision/lot split:
Dedication:
Subdivision/lot split:
The undersigned further agrees to notify all future property owners or assigns
of the cash payme�t requirement, if �t is to be collected at the time of
building permit.
�PDATE� %� Y� �� �;t� � C , �. .
S1 ATU . Propert�y Cwner
, ��ff,(�y", .� � t �t�liCN/ ' ���'7 �A ��x. .
' 7
�
�
,
�
OOII4A/1067A
�.
�
CHARTER COI�IlrIISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
City of Fridley
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1981 PAGE 1
7
Chairman Ash called the Charter Commission meeting of November 10, 1981, to order
at 7:40 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Clifford Ash, David Schaaf, Robert Peterson, Francis van Dan,
Robert Schmidt, David Pinks, Pat Kindom, Bruce Nelson
Members Absent: Jean Schell, Walt Starwalt, Larry Com�ers, Bob Yierce, Peter
Treuenf els, Irene Maertens, Susan Jackson
Others Present: William Hunt, Administrative Assistant to City Manager
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 6, 1981
MOTION by Mr. Nelson, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to approve the
minutes of October 6th, 1981, as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE,
CHAIRMAN ASH DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. •�
INTRODU CTION OF WILLIAM HUNT, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
Charter Commission
ALL VOTING AYE,
Mr. Ash introduced Mr. Hunt, Administrative Assistant to the City Manager, Nasim
Qureshi, appointed by Mr. Qureshi, as a lisison to the Charter Coi►rtnission because
this Commission is the only Commission �,,ithout a staff person and he felt it was.
important that there be a representative of City Hall to keep abreastand offer
staff support. Mr. Hunt in turn introduced Patricia Von Mosch, the new Recording
Secretary.
SUB-COMMITTEE REPOP.T:
Mr. Ash reported that the principle question before the Commission concerning
item 6.01 is that the City Manager is appointed for an indefinite period and
may be removed by City Council at will anytime up to one year. After one year,
the oniy Way the Council can remove the City Manager, if the City Manager objects,
is by filing charges and having a hearing. It is possible, and it has happened
in neighborhing communities, that the City Manager can become a"political" item
and a number of people may want the City Manager removed. It is very difficult,
at this point, for the Council to remove the City I�'Ianager without filing cause.
The questions become: Should the City Council be given the right to make the
City Manager serve at their will? What protection should the City Manager have
in this case? There being no one present from the Committee, Mr. Ash asked for
volunteers to research past minutes and gather information as a startiig point
for debate. Mr. Peterson and Mr. Nelson indicated an interest and Mr. Ash
appo inted Mr. Peterson as Chairman. --
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION STATEMENT: __
Mr. Ash indicated that.a memorandum dated October 21, 1981, had been received
from Mr. Hunt on the draft of the affirmative action statement for the City
Charter. He referred to the debate in the October 6, 1981 minutes which said
that a draft of the first aff irmative action statement had been sent to the Charter
Commission's attorney, and, as far as he knew, no.reply had been received.
7A
Charter Commission Neeting - Tuesday� November 10. 1981 Page 2
�',r. Hunt commented that the affirmative action statement is rsally not a
statement at all� although Fridley was one of the first cities in the State to
have an Affirmative Action Program approved by the appropriate state bodies.
He further stated that a definition of affirmative action he heard as
" preferential hiring of Women and mi�orities as a remedy for past discrimination��
Was a good capsule statement as put into the area of hiring. He has drafted
a policy statement but feels� personally, ths.t it doesn•t belong in the City
Charter.
Mr. Ash indicated that Mr. van Dan expressed an interest in redrafting
something for the Charter Commission's consideration just putting into the
Chartsr a statement of philosophy or general statement indicating there should
be an affirmative action program.
After discussion� it was decided N'r. van Dan should have some specific language
prepared in order #.o address and either ta.ke action or table the affirmativ�e
action issue by the December 1, 1981, meeting of the Charter Commission.
Hopefully� the information from the attorney xill also be received by that time.
It xas further proposed that Mr. van Dan have a draft prepared and distributed
to the Charter Commission's attorney and members before the December meeting to facilitai
deliberation and resolution of the issue. Mr. Ash understands that rir. van Dan
-- and the Human Resources Department are in the process of drafting something at
the pressnt tims.
REDISTRICTTJG t
h'r. Ash next referred to the October 22� 1981� memorandum of Mr. 7nman on
redistricting in conjunetion with a possib2e Charter change to revise the t�me
period the City has to redistrict. Mr. Ash summarized by saying that Section
2.03 of the Charter says substantially two things. The Charter gives the
council the power to redo the wards as often as they see fit� but,as a minimum
those who drafted the Charter felt it important to make the �rds equal and required
the Council do so in two years or not �et_paid. The drawing mf wards has a
history of debate and the Charter Commission asked the Administration and Council
if 2.03 should be revised to give them authority to set up a committee to do
it for them. They responded tha.t they didn't �,ra.nt to do this. The next issue,
two years is a long time. The main debate� it is felt� should be done sooner
since the census is official and the clock is running. Mr. Ash then referred to
a lettar from rir. Vir�il Herrick� City Attorney� dated April 8� 1981. which
a2though it doesn!t Rive a specific date, does say that the City�must rezone within two
years after official certification of the 1980 census which could begin any time
after January 1� 1982. •
The real question being� is two years after it is made official too long a period�
Unoffici.nl figures show that Ward I needs to gain 1400 voters and Ward II needs
to lose 1700� indicating that the Wards are obviously not appropriatsly
represet�ed. Mr. Ash indicated that the task is really a short-term project once
started.
Mr� Peterson felt it should be keyed to a very short time after state re-
apportionment and then the City Council Would have to act quicltly after that.
��
i�
Charter Coffinission rieeting - Tuesday, November 10, 1981 Page 3
Mr. Ash followed by stating that there is a one-third difference between the
xards� one being at 8600 and one at almost 12�000� so concurred xith Mr. Peterson.
Mr. Nelson felt there should be some guidelir�es before the filing process
begins so as not to change in mid-stream and possibly influence the election process.
Mr. Peterson then said he felt it should be set up so redistricting was
accomplished a certain deadline ahead of filing date so that the "two" election
xould be run in the new wards. Mr. Schaaf reiterated by saying reapportionment
shall be done so as to effect the boundaries for the "two" election.
Mr. Hunt inquired as to the state or federal requirements on fairness in
variance within the population of a district. Mr. Schaaf respo�ded with
plus or minus 2� to 3�6= or� as N.r. Peterson said it would be a 69� differential betweaan
the highest and lowest making Fridley•s variance of 8,000 to 12�000 too great.
Mr, Ash indicated at this time that the options on redistricting were to table
it indefinitely and leave it as is or to put it on-next month's agenda and
continue to debate until someone makes a motion to do something definite. r:r.
Pinks expressed some concern over the fact that the issue has been discussed for
quite a while and it could become less important as we get further away from
the i9so census and closer to the 1990 one.
l�.r� Ash appointed Mr. Schaaf to draS* words for and submit his recommendations
on Section 2.03 for the next meeting. He also recommended that each member read
the state statute on redis�.ricting before the next mesting.
OID BUSINESS�
Mr. Petsrson indicated that upon appointment to the Commission he had understoo'
there was no meeting the month of �ecember. There being no objections� it was
decided that the December 1 meeting would be cancelled and the next meeting of
the Charter Commission would be January 5� 1982� and all agenda items for the
December meeting be moved to the January agenda.
Mr. Ash then read a Ietter and a certificate of appreciation being sent to
i:essrs. Kenneth Brennen, John Swanson, David Berg and Tim Breider and signed by
himself as Chairman of the Charter Commission thanking them for serving on
the Corranission.
r��a Bvs�ss,
Mr. Hunt spoke of resources �vailable through the League of T'innesota Cities .
He mentioned two particular items "iiodel Charter for r:innesota Cities" and
"Principles and Problems of Charter r�.lcing" and felt this could be useful
resource material� especially to new members of the Charter Commission. He also
indicated he would order copies and send to all members, as well as any other
information Commission members might find useful.
Mr. Ash ment ioned that he had been
hearing and answered questions.
irivited to t�he Lino Lakes Charter Comission
�
�
�
I
m
Cha.rter Commission 1✓�eeting — Ztiiesday. November 10. 1981 Pa�e 4
ADJOUR.NI�NT:
MOTIOIv by Na. Schaaf, seconded by Mr. van Dan. to adjourn. UPON A VOI� VOTE.
ALL VOTING A�, CHAIRA"r;AN ASH DECLARED THE CHAR.TER COI�'SSSION I�TING OF
NOVEM$�R 10 � 1981 � ADJOUR��r�D AT 9: Dd P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
Pat Von A;osch.
- Recording Secr6ta.ry
R
7C
TME
m
OF
�
DIAECTORATE
�F
PUBLIC WORKS
DATE �anuary 13, 1982
ROM �D.P.W.�errold L. Boardman - Planning
UBJECT
Comnunity Development Block Grant
Projects for 1982
��, ..
.
�-' '= � • •
�'��� � � - .
• .
_ ,•.�:
MEMO N0. 82-03
TO
�
ACTIONI INFO.
�
Please see attached the recorr�nended Comnunity Development Block Grant Projects for
1982 which need approval by the City Council so that they can be submitted to Anoka
County for final approval and submission to HUD. This year the regulations have
been relaxed considerably regarding public hea-x�ings, and the only required public
hearing is at the County Board level.� We still have five project areas but the
steering committees have been eliminated. In our project area (Coon Rapids, Blaine
and Fridley) we have agreed to a direct pass through of funds which means that the
City is eligible for $201,322.00.
The Community Development Commission reviewed the possible projects eligible to the
City_ and developed a list of potential projects. They then held public hearings to
receive input on possible projects and made final recommendations on two project
applications.
(1)
i2)
Housing Retrofit and Weatherization Program ...$80,000.00
Moore Lake Land Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . .$121,322.00
Please ensure that these applications are submitted to the City Council for their
review on January 18, 1982. This will give us adequate time to make any necessary
revisions prior to the February 15, 1982 deadline for submission to Anoka County.
JLB/de
- -
-- _ ,_:. _. , , -..
_ i -- - -
- _ _ _ _- - . . _, - - � - - - -- -` - _ - -- - --
. j
�
. .. _ ,
" i � - - --
0
i �-
19$2 ANOKA COUNTY CDBG
BREAKDOWN #3 - 16X CUT OF '81 FUNOING
I. Anoka
Columbia Heights
Hilltop —
II. Blaine
Coon Rapids
fridley
III. Centerville
Circle Pines
Lexington .
Lino Lakes
S�rin4 Lake Park
IV. Andover
Bethel
_ Surns
Oak Grove
Ramsey
St. Francis
y. Columbus
East Bethel
Ham Lake
Linwood
1
Co. Rehab
Co. E.D.
Co. Admin.
150,191
155,822
8,002
314,0
185,461
• 290,454
201,322
677,237
6;163
45,255
24,036
36,951
43,646
15,01
59,062
2,731
11,881�
23,030
34,667
18,_145
149,516
33,819
34,222
58,042
13,718
139,861
� 8A
1,4 63`,680 .
100,000
150,000 -, 22,000 {15�) = 128,000 (7.2p)
(15 month budget)
The 22,000 cut will be distributed
to cities-tiy formula
$1?,786,680 ($4� of 198T) -
�
� _ .
� �
�
HOUSIPiG RETROFIT A!��D t�!EATEiERIZ�TIO"� PRQ�PAP1
CDBG PRQPt1SAL
FY 19�2
CITY OF FRIDLEY
a
. .
1
ac
HOUSING RETROFIT AND WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM
Project Overview
In keeping with the direction established by the Comprehensive Plan, the
City of Fridley is maintaining an onqoing effort to i�prove the existing
housing stock and to preserve residential neighborhoods. Two important com-
ponents of this effort are weatherization and retrofitting/rehabilitation of
single family homes.
CDBG Project Activity
The project activities being proposed by this application are city-wide
weatherization of single family homes of elderly persons (62 years of age and
older), and the removal of architectural barriers within single family homes
of disabled persons. All residents receiving aid must be of low and moderate
income and meet all eligibility criteria of HUD Section 8 income limits. The
actual administration of the project will be done by the Anoka County Cormunity
Action Program.
Fundi ng Sumnary
The total project request is $80,000.00. In order to maintain maximum
program flexibility, the entitlement funds for both v�eatherization and retro-
fitting will be combined with approximately $40,000 allocated to each activity.
Funds may be transferred between activities to ensure the awarding of as many
grants as possible.
Total Project Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . .$80,000.00
Weatherization . . . . . . . . . . . . .$40,000.00
Retrofit . ....... ........... ... ..._.$40,000.00
Each grant awarded for retrofit will have a maximum amount of $6,000.00,
with an additional $3,000.00 ceiling for ary necessary rehabilitation work
associated with the removal of architectural barriers. The total grant ceiling
wall be $9,000.00. Approxir�ately 4 to 6 grants will be awarded.
Each grant awarded for weatherization will have a maximum amount of $750.00
for materials and $1,500.00 for labor. An additional amount of $1,500.00 may be
awarded for any necessary rehabilitation associated with the weatherization.
The total grant ceiling will be $3,750.00. Approxir�ately 12 to 15 grants will
be awarded. :
Project Duration:
The weatherization and retrofitting for which CDBG monies are committed will
be completed within one year. -
; .
-- - -.- - � � .
� _
-- -- � .
Goals of the Project:
1. To improve the existing housing stock within the City of Fridley.
2. To use available resources to assist Fridley residents who cannot afford
weatherization and retrofit improvements.
3. To promote energy related housin,q improvements.
4. To provide additional barrier-free single family housiRg units within the
City of Fridley.
Project Contact Person
Jerrold L. Board�an
City Planner/Executive Director of HRA
City of Fridi�y
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
. �
I _ "
�
�
MOOR� L.AKc PROJECT
C�BG PROPCS!�L
FY �9�2
CITY OF FRIDLEY
�
��•
.�
MOORE LAKE PROJECT
Project Overview
The City of fridiey in its efforts to promote needed housing in the City,
established its Moore Lake Redevelopment District in March of 1981 with the
intent to use tax increment f�nancing to encourage developme�t through private
investment.
The plan lays out its goals to provide for a mixture of housing units in-
cluding single family, townhouse/quads and multiple dwellings. The redevelop-
ment effort received approval by the City Planning Commission, City Council,
Fridley Housing and Redevelopr�ent Authoirty and State Planning Aqency. This
approval formally established a tax increment financing district under Minnesota
State Law and was declared a blighted area.
CDBG Project Activity
The project activity being proposed by this application is for acquisition
of property for the development of a multiple unit�tiuilding for the elderly of
which 20'6 of the units would be provided� for low to moderate income households.
It is necessary to tandem public funds with private investment in order to put
this package together.
This project will help implement the removal of blighted conditions which
effect the general character of the District and help provide additional
housing to meet the City's housing assistance plan.
Fundi ng Surmary:
7ota7 Project Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$6,390,000.00
0
CDBG Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121,32P. 00
Ci ty Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 568, 678•:�0
Private Development . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,700,000.00
Project Duration:
The project acquisition for which CDBG monies are comr�itted will be
completed within one year. Total Project completion of construction is
estimated for 1985.
Project Activity Breakdown for CDBG P1oney:
Land Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $�121,322.0�
Total Project Activity Breakdown:
Land Acquisitiort . . . . ._ . , . . . . . . .
Public Utility Proj. . . . . . •� • • • • • •
Administration of Above . . . . . • • • • •
(Including Legal/Consultant Costs)�
�
_ - .� _ ,
�
508,675.00
95,000.00
35,500.00
�
10� Project Budget Overhead . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,500.00
Public Investment Sub-Total $690,000.00
Developer Land Purchase. . . . . • • • • • • • • • . 375,000.00
Construction Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,325,Q00.00
Private Investment Sub-Total 5,700.000.00
Total Project Investment $6,015,000.00
Goals of the Project:
. 1. To promoie and publically assist the development of the undevelooed and
underutilized property in the Redevelopment District. This shall include
the use of-tax increment financing to develop commerciai and housing
deveiopments. Such assistance may include land "write down" costs, land
acquisition and parcel assemblage to provide large land tracts for develop-
ment, property acquisition and clearance for new developments, property
acquisition and clearance of non-conforming la�d uses that are near new
developments, financial assistance in the provision of public utilities,
financial assistance for the provision of necessary site improvements,
and such other assistance that is in conformance with State Law.
2. To stimulate private invest�ent to stabalize and properly balance the
housing supply. -
3. To increase the tax base of the City through cooperation and assistance
to housing developers with consideration of full utilization of under-
- utilized residential properties.
4. To provide a plan and continued planning for orderly residential expansion
which allows for the most economical utilitization of municipal services.
5. To provide development and redevelopment opportunities that will allow for
the construction of a variety of residential units and corimercial services
throughout the Moore Lake Redevelop�ent Project which would effectiveiy
serve the housing and corunercial service needs of the City.
6. To designate through offical land use controls, areas best suited for
residential and corrmercial development.
7. To maintain a healthy, safe environment throughout the Moore Lake Project
Areas. •
8. To provide various forms of financial assistance that are deemed appropriate,
legal and acceptable to private enterprise in their development efforts such
as industrial revenue funding, tax exempt municipal revenue bonds, or state
and federal loan and grant monies.
9. To promote sound land use development procedures including area design
standards, landscaping and lighting standards, architectural review of
new developments, and such other standards that may be developed that
promotes sound land resource management. __
,
°G
U
10. To continually update development and redevelopment plans, design standards,
and other official controls that will promote sound development, redevelop-
ment, health and safety.
Project Contact Person
Jerrold L. Boardman
City Planner/Executive Director of HRA
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue Plortheast
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
�
�
. _ _ ..
��
t
�•
CITY OF FRIDLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -
MEETING '
� OCTOBER 13, ] 981
CALL 70 ORDER:
Chairperson Oquist called the October 13. 1981, Comnunity Development Comnission
meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
ROIL CALL:
Members Present: LeRoy Oquist, Kenneth Vos, A1 Gabel. Sharon Gustafson
Members Absent: Connie Modig
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner
Mary Cayan, Human Services Assistant
Marion Anderson. 460 Mississippi St. N.E.
Clara Nordell, 460 Mississippi St. N•N�E (IYDP Committee)
Lynn Baergerhoff, 1374 Van Buren St. ..
Virginia Steinmetz. 6340 Marion St. N.E.( League of Women Voters)
Meradie Selin. 6150 - 6th St. N.E. (League of Women Voters)
Mary Boedigheimer, 589Q W. Moore Lake Dr. (League of Women Yoters)
APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1481, CONT'IUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES:
1NOTION BY DR. VOS� SECONDED BY 1►Q2. GABEL� TO APPROVE TXE SEPTEMBER 8� 198I�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIDN MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOT.ING AYE� CHAIRPERSON OQUI52' DE'C�D THE MOTION `'
CARRIED UNANII�lDUSLY. : =: - • •
1. EXPLANATION OF CC�MMI.'P;:TY DEVELOPMENT BLOi.K GRANTS (CDBG) -.)ERRY BOARDMAN,
. CI +Y'�l-A(�N'ER: � . _ . � .
Mr. Oquist introduceci Mr: 6oaroman to the ppople at the meeting.
Mr. Boa•rdman stated that CorrrunitY fefundsmtc�tcoinmunities,SCOUDties? or ctherral
, �rograms which �210�•1 distribut�on o
� municipal or public a�encies for specific �ommunity development-ty�e activities.
Tnis last year, Anoka County, whose poau1at�on is cv�r 2JO,QAO, is no��► eligible
for automatic btock grant programs. Anv �n�.,nty �ver ?��,nnn.;s :i?�sif��d �
tt�rough the �Departm�nt of Housing & Urban [levelopr:ent (Ht10) as an urban cour.tv. -
Tli�se ur:�;:n cou��ties, as ti�rell as '�u►�ici?al ities over 5C,�0 are e7 igible for
ent.itlement Qrants : -
. . . .� . .,•, � .
�
_-_._
�-
u �
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN7 COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 13. 1981 PAGE 2 �
through the Department of HUD. Entitlement grants mean that each of those �
communities or counties is e7igible for "x" amount of dollars. That "x" amount
of dollars are laid out over the entire United States. A dispersion formula is
used, and each of those municipalities or counties is eligible for "x" amount
of dollars. Last year Anoka County was eligible for $2.2 million under the
CDBG program. He stated that in fiscal year 1982, it looks like Anoka County
wi11 again be eligible for around s2 million.
Mr. Boardman stated that in allocating these monies, the Federal Government
also lays out program eligibility. It lays out specific things the money is to
� be used for. Generally, the eligible activities are bli htmand�blidhtin�P ondi-
type of activity, including acquisition of property ( 9 9 9
tions). special projects like removal of architectural barriers for handicapped
persons or a project that removes restrictions of mobility for eiderly and handi- .
capped, payments to housing owners for losses of rent that has occurred in holding
a temporary series of housing units that are to be utilized for relocation, etc.,
code enforcement items for the deterioration of buildings. slums. blighting
effects, etc., and demolition and removal of those types of blighting effects,
relocation payments for displaced individuals and families displaced by govern-
ment action, activities necessary to the development of comprehensive planning,
grants to neighborhood based non-profit organizations; a7so activities that are
necessary to the,dhborhoodnredevelopmentntype pro ectsy_wide energy use strategy
and community neig
Mr. Boardman stated that since Anoka County is just over the Population of
200,000, HUD requires that all the municipalities in Anoka County join with the
County in a grant program. If any municipality pulis out of the program, then
Arwka County is no longer eligible for block grant monies as entitlement funds.
It is not an automatic grant to the County. In last year's program and it wil]
probably be the same this year. Anoka County is divided into five districts.
Then the County will divide the sums of monies into each of those districts.
The comnunities in each of those districts are then competing for that amount of
money. Last year, Coon Rapids. B�OOOe� Th s�yeare t looks asnthoughPit wmll �be the
palities competing �for over $800,
same group, so the projects that fridl�y submits to Anoka County have to be
determined eligible by the County. by HUO, and scored on a point system in order
to compete with Coon Rapids and Blaine.
Mr. 8oardman stated that Anoka County makes the application to HUD, and Anoka
County is the ad�ninistrator of the program. Each of the communities makes an
application to Anoka County''to distribute a portion of that money, and each
community is responsible to Anoka County for distribution and completion of the
program.
Mr. Boardman stated it is important to know that HUD does not have to disburse
the monies. If HUD feels there are no activities in Anoka County that qualify,
So, it behooves the
they do not have to disburse the money to Anoka County. They also
cities to put together good projects that are justifiable to HI�D.
have to make sure they have a program that will compete with Coon Rapids and
Blaine, because those communities are Fridley's primary competition.
- - : .. :-, - - _ __ -
�
�
�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEE7ING, OCTOBER 13. 1981
PAGE 3
Mr. Boardman stated that Anoka County has set up a TAC (Technical Advisory
Comnittee). That committee sets the rules and regulations by which �the
communities make application and makes the determination ns tc how those appli-
cation funds will be spent. There are members from each of the communities on
the committee. 7AC then sets up the process and makes recommendations to Anoka
County. In the last funding cycle, TAC recor►mended a scoring system that Anoka
County uses in reviewing applications.
Mr. Boardman stated that when HUD looks at the project applications, eligible
activities also have to fall into different criteria. That criteria is that a
percentage must benefit low and moderate income citizens. If it is an economic
development project. it has to meet the criteria of removing blight or slum
- and/or providing jobs to low and moderate income persons. So. a lot of justifi-
cation has to be made to Anoka County and to HUD that a project shows a benefit
to low and moderate income, because that is the primary category thQy look at.
Mr. Boardman stated that iast year, out of the $2 million, 75� of the funds had
to be a benefit to low and moderate income, and 25� to economic development.
When Rnoka County submitted an application to HUD, Fridley had an economic
development program. Columbia Heights had an economic development program, and
Coon Rapids had an economic development program, so Anoka County had to be very
- careful that all of the economic development programs tied together were not
more than 25� of the total grant.
;� Mr. Boardman stated that Anoka County also did two other things: (1) At the
advice of TAC, right off the top of the grant program, Anoka County took x
amount of dallars for administration costs, because Anoka County has the admini-
� stration problems; (2) They took $200,000 and set that aside for a county-wide
rehab program,which was given to the Anoka County CAP Rgency.
The CAP Agency has
an i�n-place program� Right now they operate the weatherization funds which is
also a federal grant. The county-wide rehab program was then allocated by
community. He stated it looked like money would again be allocated for rehab
for the county, and �t.dlekedCooneRapids WanddBlaineound $600,000 available for
competit�on between Fri y.
Or. Yos asked Mr. Boardman to explain what ihe CDBG funds were used for last year.
Mr. Boardman stated those funds were used to purchase the hardware building in
the Center City Redevelopment Project. Because of the time crunch, they had to
move on a project. and this was a quick project and one that was justifiable
under the regulations.
Mr. Lynn Baergerhoff asked if the scope of these prograens�in�Fridley�could
each city. It seemed that in a lot of cases, what happ
also benefit Coon Rapids, etc. .
Mr. Boardman stated there is a lot of discussion go�He statedphe�thought that in
smaller communities that don't receive much money.
the smaller communities, they are going to see Circle Pines, Lino Lakes, Center-
ville, and those types of communities getting together and working on a joint
:_ project. He did not foresee that happening in Blaine, Coon Rapids, or Fridley.
�
� :, _ _ . _ _ _
� i�
:-
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 13. 1981 PAGE 4
�
�
Mr. Boardman stated that if it does houldnorianize1withpAn katCountyCand turn a
development in the sense that, they w 9
portion of their money,o�nottfoaesee ituhappeningeintothermareas,sespecially inPe
of association. He did
the areas that benefit low and moderate income.
Mr. Boardman stated that last year each of the project areas had a steering
committee that was established. That steering corr�nittee was actually a public
agency appointed by Anoka County to operate in each of the five project areas.
Each of the communities appointed two members to serve on the steering committee.
The steering committees made recommendations on projects, and those recommenda-
tions were forwarded to the County Board. Dennis Schneider and Barb Favor were
Fridley's representatives on tBoardman�stated hetwasfsecretary�forythat committee.
and Blaine project area. Mr.
He stated that the steering comnittee process may not happen again this year.
There are changes in the federal regulations that do not require that kind of
citizen participation, and the County may drop the-steering committee activity.
Mr. 8oardman handed out copies of last year's Project Selection Criteria Format,
which outlined five project categories:
1. Economic Development Projects
2. Neighborhood Rehabilitation Projects �
3. Public Facility Projects .
4. Housing Projects
5. Comprehensive Projects
Mr. Boardman stated that last Yehe�hardwarebbuild�ingWinPtheeCenter CityrRedevel p-
Comnittee: (1) ac uis�tion of t
ment Project; and �2) a Riverview Heights Development Project. The Steering
Committee chose the $280,000 acquisition of the hardware building.
Mr. Boardman stated that, at the present time, they have had an initial TAC
meeting, and they are now in the process of putting together applications for
next spring when the monies are available. They are looking at a project
recommendation to City Counar1 i�n�January. 7herecisaa lot�oftworklthatehaseto
submitted to Anoka County e y
be done. They will be making recoaventhe�fisurestto justifytywhetherPitnbeCrehab,10n
based on projects they know they h 9
housing-type projects, additional Center City projects, etc. To date, Staff has
not formulated any recommendations ona�rloncer�teHm Wau3ayear�comprehensivemunity
Development Corrrmission to be'look�ng 9 es of projects and programs
program in which they can lay out three years of the typ
they might want to work on. _
Mr. Boardman stated he would welcome �he Cits shouldhgete0nvolvedtin.auHeestated
as to the type of projects they feel Y
he thought they could realistically figure on $200,000. �
� _ _.
. _ - - --. -- . � . � .
.� �. -
� �- ' � - .
i
,;
�
; .- -
�
c
�!�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 13� 1981 ___ PAGE_5
2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON USES OF CDBG FUNDS:
Mr. Lynn Boergerhoff stated he is the Co-chairperson of the IYDP (International
Year of Disabled Persons) Committee, which was formulated last spring.. In
conversations of the people who attended the committee's first meeting, certain
needs were addressed. Transportation was specifically addressed as an unmet need
on the county level and the city level for anyone who has any kind of health
problem that limits mobility. At first the Committee focused their attention on
transportation needs and then felt they should canvas the City and try to
understand how many different areas of need there really are.
Mr. Boergerhoff stated they put together a questionnaire of about 26 questions
which was then mailed out with the city newsletter in mid-September to every
household in Fridley. He stated they have received back approximately 700 out of
16,385 that were mailed out. Even though this does not seem like very ma�y
responses, he stated it is indeed enough to make a good assessment of the feelings
of those people who have persons in their house:.olds who, because of health
problems, have experienced problems in the community. At a meeting at Unity
Hospital� it came out that both the private organizations and Unity Hospital are
very interested in the results of this survey. A private business has offered to
use its computer facilities to handle the results of the survey. The IYDP Comnittee
has accepted this offer as, hopefully, the survey will be published and made
available to anyone who is intere _ed. The survey is in the process of being
completed by the computer facility, and the Committee should be receiving some
information back on it in November.
�, Mr. 8oergerhoff stated he felt there will be some definite need in transportation
- to buildings, both private and possibly public. and may be in health care,
employment, education, or whatever other needs are reflected from the survey.
Mr. Boergerhoff stated the Committee also assessed what transportation facilities
are currently available in the city and the county. They found that there are
many types of transportation services available� either public or private, and
some are driven by volunteers or professional people. Many are inaccessible.
which means they can not be used by anyone with serious mobility limitations,
or the services are too expensive to use. The private providers, in many cases,
are competing against each other to offer the service and essentially charge more
than the average person can pay to go to the doctor's office or shopping at
Northtown. Ne stated there has been an accessible bus in the City for some time
provided by the Lions Club. The bus has been underutilized, and he felt it
probably has not been adve;rtised very well. He stated the use of the bus has
increased now, and it is very likely that the number of people using the bus will
become greater than the bus's capabilities. .7he Committee feels there will be an
increase in the need for usable transportation services, both county-wide and
city-wide. �
Mr. Boer9erhoff stated that at this potnt, the IYDP Committee would like to
recommend that some of the grant monies be set aside for continuing research into
the area of disabilities and health problems,'specifically in the area of trans-
portation. This area has possibly not been addressed and a combination of support
from the City and the private sector together may result in at least a city-wide
transportation system� which might expand to be county-wide. -_ --- ------ ---
` ' : � ; _ � _ _
--- _- -, - � =-- ! �
1
a
�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 13,_ 1981 PAGE 6 3
Mr. Boardman stated that one thing that has to be considered is that HUD does
not like to fund on-going programs. HUD likes to ]ook at concrete items that
can be completed in one year. HUD will fund planning-type of programs, but does
not get involved in long term on-going funding activities. HUD will fund accessi-
ble type projects such as making a building accessible to the handicapped.
Mr. Oquist mentioned some of the items the Commission discussed at their last
meeting that they could recomnend CDBG funds be used for. These included-- a
Riverview Heights neighborhood study - property acquisition, an elderly facility,
energy improvements - low and moderate incomes, rehab funds - single family, ho►�e
ownership, transportation needs - elderly and handicapped. home maintenance
programs - tools, workshops, possibly a Hyde Park neighborhood study for park
development, possibly a home ownership project for the Moore Lake Redevelopment
District - financing down payments for multiple ownerships, and possible an elderly
housing development in the Moore Lake Redevelopment Distr�ct.
Ms. Gustafson stated she would like to explore the possibility of providing write-
down loans for home ownership in the Moore 1�ake Redevelopment District.
Mr. Boardman stated he would h�y�_.to talk to the Anoka County consultant to see
if that would be an appropriate use of the funds.
Mr. Boardman stated that what he wou]d like to do now is talk to the City Manager
about what projects he feels the City Council might be interested in. With that
input and with input f rom the Community Development Comnission. he will put
together some projects that Staff feels would be appropriate. He stated he will
bring that to the next meeting. He would like the Commission to prioritize these
projects for submittal to the City Council.
Mr. Oquist stated that maybe Staff could ]ook into the area of a study on trans-
portation to see if there would be any justification for funding.
Mr. 4quist thanked those in the audience for coming and for the input.
3. ANOKA COUNTY HOUSING RESOURCE BOARD Memo #81-74 :
Ms. Cayan stated that the Anoka County Housing Resource Board was apparently
formed in 1976. It has been relatively inactive, and Mr. Joe Grillo, Sr. Planner
from the City of Coon Rapids. is attempting to get the Board active again. She
stated Mr. Grillo has requested citizen participation, rather than staff partici-
pation. She asked if anyone on the Commission would be interested in attending
the October 14 meeting in o�rder to obtain further information about the organiza-
tion.
Ms. Gustafson stated she was interested and would try to attend this meeting.
� _ ...
�
�
� �
COMr1UNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMI5SION MEETING, NOVEMBER 10, 1981 PAGE 2
Mr. Boardman stated the first three projects Staff would recommend to go ahead
with are:
1.
2.
3.
Rehab funds for handicap retrofit - single family
Energy improvements - low and moderate income (Mr. Boardman stated
they are primarily looking at energy improvements for the elderly.
rather than low and moderate income at this time.)
Moore take District - housing development (Mr. Boardman stated this
would be an elderly project. They would use the CDBG funds for the
acquisition of land for write-down for an elderly project.)
Mr. Boardman stated Staff was also recomnending two projects as "back-up"
projects:
1. Economic Deve�opment Corporation
2. Acquisition af blighted housing - Moore Lake District
Mr. Boardman stated he felt they could easily put the first three projects
together with justification. and that was why Staff was recommending these
three projects to the Community Development Commission.
Mr. Boardman stated they will have approximately $230,000 in CDBG funds, of
which the first two projects would probably be about $80,000 and �3 would be
approximately $140-150,000. For projects #1 and #2, they would turn the
operation of the programs over to the Anoka County CAP Agency since that agency
is already an entity geared up for these types of programs.
MOTION BY DR. VOS� SECONDED BY l�II2. GABEL, TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING TXREE
PROJECTS AS RECON.AIENDED BY STRFF AS THE ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT 2982 PROJECTSs
1. REHAB FUNAS FOR HANDICAP RETROFIT — SINGLE FAMILY
2. ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ELDERLY
3� lyQpRE LAKE DISTRICT — ELDERLY AOUSING DEVELOPI�lENT
UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRZED UNANIJHOUSLY. , .
. �
�
I
�
2. ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY NOUSING RES4URCE B4ARD - REPORT:
Ms. Cayan stated that siacehadethree meetings�n Shethas�attendedktwo�meetings,unity
Housing Resource Board h s
and Ms. Gustafson has attended all three. _�_
Ms. Cayan stated the county resource boards have been around for a long time,
but thr volunteerbboardsry She�statedTtherethassbeensakresurgence9of�interest �
they a
TME GITY O�
FRtC�L Y
DATE
ROM
UB.IECT
�---_ _ �
DIRECTORATE
OF
PUBLIC WORKS
Repair of Well No. 4
TO
9 �
I
M EMO R A N O UM
ACTIONI INFO.
During November 1981, we observed an operational problem with the pump
at Well No. 4, located at 631 - 63rd Avenue. We immediately shut the
well down, in that it appeared the support shaft for the pump was loose.
Bids were requested to repair the pump and clean the we]1 if it was re-
quired. Four bids were received.
Bergerson-Caswell was apparent low bidder at $21,261.
It is desired to remove the pump and repair it, plus investigate the well
to determine if any bailing or cleaning is required. Accordingly, the
bids received identify everything that could be required to return the
well to full productive operation. It is anticipated that only the pump
and supports will need to be repaired.
Recommend the City Council receive the bids to repair We71 No. 4 and award
the contract to Bergerson-Caswell.
JGF: i jk
Attach: 2
�,
I . _. _ ._ . __ _
�
1 ; \' ' � iZ
n
�_ �I�Y � .
ATE 3anua 7 1982
ROM Ral h Vollanan
UBJECT
Repair of tiVell #4
����������
TO
John Flora
After reviewing all bids, I am recoimnending that we accept the bid
from Bergerson-Caswell Inc. for $21,261.00.
Attach: 1
0
�
0
9 �'�
TION INFO
x
i
�
v� E
� �
'C �
'�
.�
i g �
i �
O
I� '� O
, � � W
' I Q
C
I L Z
, � O
C "'
� W
p � J
0.
'v p�
m V
��u
�1�
F�w- � I,
i
C �I
c3'
� b
� � � N.
F- G1 N �
f N E �
�- Q r
J C9 � O
O Z ••
�--� a•� J r
� Z -J �
li W W
a 3
p � LL 0�0 'G
C O Q► O �O
�-+
►�- � � r m C�
V a � O � � �
t+� r • c� y •
� Q Z ` � �
� = V J
Z O � C • � "
� a �, `r �
� �
J N �O
H � E
� V U
r
� �
� i
m 1 � 1�1 I I� IN) (+
� O
c
� r
r- �
� � w
o c v+
z �
W R3 fl.
�
�e���l:,afi
w
�
w
3
�
4
�7
/
L
��o
�� I� I
�i�►.n
�
J
w �
- C
J �
�f L
f0
�
i
■1-��- 0�
�:�v�
TME CITY OF
DIRECTORATE
OF
PUBLIC WORKS
� FRtDLEY
DATE January 13, 1982
pFROM D.P.W. Jerrold L. Boardman-Planninq
SUBJECT
Study to Determine Shortage of Rental
Dwellings for Low and Moderate Income
Families
Jo
MEMO N0. 82-02
TO
r�.�� i i
�
r
10 �.
MEMORANDUM
ACTION� INFO.
Please find attached resolution authorizing the City Staff to do a study on the
potential shortage of suitable rental housing stock for low and moderate income
families in the City. If approved by the City Council, we will start that study
by January 25, 1982, and will need approximately two months for completaon. It
will be important to substantiate our information with other resouce agencies such
as Metro Council, CURA, League of Ci+:ies, etc.
JLB/de
�
- � . . i - - � .
� � . -- -
-- - _
--- -- -- �
_ _- }
_ _ �
.. _ i ,
-- --- _- 1
0
�11�A� �� � 17�L
ADT80RIZING A SRUDY �0 DETER!lINE IF A SIGNIFICANT
�'A[� O�F SUITABtE RIIdI�i, DWF���S AVAII�IE ZU I�ii
Ai�D l�nDEE2ATE INO��IE FANiILIES F�ISTS IN THE CITY OF
FRIDIF.Y
Wf�REAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley is concerned with the
potential shortage of suitable rental dwellings available to low and
moderate income families or individuals, and
WHEREAS, the potential shortage could further be aggravated by the
conversion of existing rental property to condaninium form of ownership;
�a
WHERF,AS, the City, under the Uniform CondanimiLan Act, has the authority to
impose restrictions on corx3ominitan conversion if a finding is made that
there is a significant shortage of suitable law and moderate income rental
c3wel lings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID that the City Council of the City of
Fridley hereby authorizes the City to do a study to determine if a
significant shortage of suitable dwellings available to low and moderate
income families or individuals exists in the City of Fridley.
PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY O�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
D�AY OF . 1982.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR �
SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CTFRR
5/28
e
10 A
11
RESOLUTION N0. - 1982
RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO COMBINING THE CITY OF FRIDLEY WITH
THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS IN A LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the fact that the State legislature of Minnesota is in the process
of reapportionment, and
WHEREAS, one suggested plan is to combine the City of Fridley with the north
part of Minneapolis as a legislative district, and
WHEREAS, the City Council feels this would not be representative of the
interest of a suburban community, and
WHEREAS, the City Council feels that Fridley should be in a legislative
district with other suburbs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley
gaes on record as being in opposition to the combining of the City of
Fridley with the north part of Minneapolis as a legislative district.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _
DAY 0� , 1982.
WILI.IAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SIDNEY C. INMAN, CITY CLERK
�
It�SO�,UPIQd 1�A. — 1982
R�ON D�lII��]G ZSE NEID 'PO OONSTROCT PITBLIC
RDCItFATIO�L FACILITIES ArID TBE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL
�LSC�TION �AD6 ZO PAY FOR THE SAME AAID CAI�LING AH
E[f�TIQ1
WHEREAS� the City's Park and Recreation Commission has appointed an
advisory committee to stuc7y and report on the co�miunity's need for public
recreational facilities, and
WHEREAS, the advisory committee reported to the Park and Recreation
Canmission that in their opi.nion a recreation builc3ing is needed by the
community and the Park and Recreation Commission has reported and
rec�rnnended to this Council that such a building be constructed to include
an auditori�un, multi purpose rooms, a senior citizens lounge, arts and
crafts roans, activity/dance roans, a kitchenette, a running track, office
space, gymnasium space, an indoor pool, whirlpool/sauna facility,
racquetball/handball courts, locker rooms and other appurtenant
facilities, and
t�k�ERF�AS, in order to finance said improvements and acquisitions, it is
necessary that bonds be issued pledging the full faith and credit of the
City to their payment, and
Wf�'JRF�AS, in order that such bonds may be issued as general obligations, it
is necessary to submit the question of the issuance to the voters of the
� City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVF�� by the City Council of the City of
Fri8ley, Muinesota, as follaws:
1. The City Council of the City of Fridley has been informed and has
investigate8 the need for the construction of a multipurpose community
recreational facility, and has determined and cbes hereby find anc3 declare
that for the City to make such improvements at an estimated cost to the
City of not to exceed Four Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($4,850,000) it is necessary to finance the same by issuing bonds as
authorizecl by Chapter 475 of the tsinnesota Statutes and Section 7.15 of
the Home Rule Charter.
2. '171at the question of providing monies to acquire, construct and equip
said facilities shaZl be submitted to the voters of the City at a special
City election to be held on Tuesday, the 16th day of February, 1982, and
that the special election shall be helc] with the polls being open from
7:00 o'clock a.m. and renaining open until 8:00 o'clock p.m. oal said date,
and there shall be ten (10) voting precincts.
3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause printed ballots to.
be prepared for the use in said election in which the proposition shall be
stated in substantially the follawing form:
o�c�. B�o�
«Yr• � ' �; n :,��
_ � � :1: •�.11�/M' y11�I�IJti ��V��
��I�i �Z�
�SpAY, FF�tR�S 16, 1982
12A
INSIRDCl'IO�NS TO V�O�I'IItS:
Put an (X) in the square before the word "YES"
if you are in favor of the proposition, or put
an (X) before the word "ND" if you are against
- _ the proposition.
`!: � 1 1 �:I' . � . . • 11 �n `ti"li:.
rr ��• � �: r• �� :• �. � �:r
• � a� �• : � ��� ��� �:r
• � ti•� •' • • • • • � 1 1
' 'j�� ' � `l i71�
4. The City Clerk shall cause notice of said election to be given by
publication in the official news�aper of the City for at least three weeks
prior to said election and by posting said notive in at least one public
place in each voting precinct in the City at least fifteen days prior to
said election. The election shall be held at the usual voting places for
- the state general election and as set forth in Exhibit A attached to this
resolution, and said election shall be held and conducted in accordance
with the statutes of the State of Minnesota applic�ble to City elections
and the provisions of the Hame Rule Charter. The Council shall meet on
February 22, 1982, as required by law for the purpose of canvassing said
election and declaring the results thereof.
PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY O�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TfiIS
DAY OF r 1982
e
ATI'FST:
SIDNEY C. Il�'111N — CITY CLF,RK
WILLIAM J. NEE — MAYOR
F�IBIT wA" 12 B
t�ATICE OF SPHCIAL II�i'�C'PZON RFX'�ING '�E
ACQUISITION AI�ID B�ETl'F�RMIIJr OI�"
apNfM[JNITY RDC�iFATIOI�►L FACILITIi��S
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MII�1NE.90TA
February 16, 1982
I�TICE is hereby given that a Special Election of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, will be helc7 February 16, 1982, between the hours of 7:00 a.m.
and 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of submitting to the voters of the City the
follawing proposition:
"SEDULD THE CITY OF FRIDLEY ISSU� GII�ERAL
OBLIGATION BOND6 IN THE AM�UNr OF $4,850,000
FOR THE O�NSI'RUCPION OF A�UIaTY
RDCREATD'JN CF�J`PER?"
Polling places for said electior-will be as follaws:
Ward 1- Precinct 1 Woodcrest School
880 Osborne Rpad NE
Ward 1- Precinct 2 Aayes School
- 615 Mississippi Street NE
Ward 1- Precinct 3 City Aall
6431 University Avenue NE
Ward 2- Precinct 1 Senior Aigh School
6000 West Nbore Lake Drive
Ward 2- Precinct 2 Rice Creek School
6666 Arthur Street
Ward 2- Precinct 3A North Park School
- 5575 Fillmore Street I�
Ward 2- Precinct 3B Gardena Elementary School
1401 Gardena Avenue NE
Ward 3- Precinct 1 Riverwood School
7150 East River Road
: _. . _ i
_ - �
,.
Page 2— Resolution No. - 1982
Ward 3 - Precinct 2
Ward 3 - Precinct 3
Stevenson Elenentary School
6050 East River R�oad
Roslyn Park Wesleyan Church
5300 Sixth Street 1�
SIDNEY C. Il�IlN1�N — CITY CLERR
PUBLISH: January 20, 27 and February 3, 1982
3/5/23
0
; _
12 .. C
RESOLUTIO�� f�0. - 1982
RESOLUTIOW DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOIP�TING ELECTION JUDGES FOR Tf�E
FEBRUARY 16, 1982 SPECIAL ELECTION
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Anoka County, Minnesota, at a regular r�eeting thereof on January lB, 1982
SECTION 1. That on the 16th day of February, 1982, there shall be a Special
Election.
SECTION 2. That the polling places for said Election shall be as follo�vs:
Ward 1 Precinct 1
lJard 1 Preci nct 2
Ward 1 Precinct 3
Ward 2 Precinct 1
Ward 2 Precinct 2
t��ard 2 Precinct 3A
Ward 2 Precinct 3B
I�ard 3 Preci nct 1
Ward 3 Precinct 2
Ward 3 Precinct 3
Woodcrest School
Nayes School
City Hall
Fridley Senior High School
Rice Creek School
Gardena School
��orth Park School
Riverwood School
Stevensarr School
Roslyn Park Church
SECTION 3. That the polling places will be open from 7:00 A.M. to a:00 P.i4.
SECTION 4. That the following people are hereby appointed to act as Judges for
said Election except that t:�z City Clerk is hereby authorized to
appoint qualified substitutes in cases of conflict of interest as
set forth in Chapter 4, Section 4.05 of the City Charter:
lJard 1 Preci nct 1
� *Carolyn Holmen
Geraldine Sherve
Alice Henderson
t�1ajorie Rosin
Cami 11 a P1ue11 er
Sandra Gor�an
Uard 1 Precinct 2
*Joyce P1cLe11 an
h1arlyn Johnson
Shirley Kohlan
��lary Ellen Storley
Mary Sullivan
Lois Hines
�Jard 1 Precinct 3
*Charlene Swanson
Margaret Powell
Alice Moe
Rosella Amar
Rosalie Halling
Vi Lind
R
R
R
D
D
D
7310 Tempo Terrace
7361 �1er�ory Lane
7600 Stinson Blvd
7400 Lyric Lane
7541 - 4th Street
7443 Concerto Curve
D 6749 Kennaston
D 850 Pandora Drive
D 236 Rice Creek Blvd
R 414 Rice Creek Terrace
R 522 - 66th Avenue
. R 870 Rice Creek Terrace
R 6010 - 5th Street
R 6241 Sunrise Drive
R 251 Sylvan Lane
D 6121 Sunrise Drive
D 380 - 66th Avenue
D 6221 Sunrise Drive
i
�
�
i
�
786-8981
784-1659
784-39II0
7II6-8792
784-2225
786-4177
571-1560
571-1454
574-0426
571-5429
571-119II
571-1196
571-1679
571-6241
571-1996
571-1318
571-9462
571-3648
13
Page 2 Resolution No. - 1982
Ward 2 Precinct 1
*Virginia Steinmetz
Janice Hebeisen
Mary Davis
Ali�e Peterson
Marlene Eidem
Dolores Lynch
Ward 2 Precinct 2
*Jeanette Micholski
Marlis Johnson
Pat Anderson
Helen Shaffer
Rhonda Christiansen
Greta Siverts
Ward 2 Precinct 3A
*Virginia Bureau
Jean Waga � _
Delores Mellum
- Mary Jechorek
P�aida Kruger
Jean Gerou
- Ward 2 Precinct 3B
*Judy Engebretson
Nancy Strong
Marlys Lisowski
Virginia Schnabel
Barb ��i 1 son
Jean Lee
- tJard 3 Preci nct 1
*Betty Bonine
Janet Kothman
Myrtle P•lorphew
Connie Sanuelson
Marlys Hinsverk
Lavonne Avery
Ward 3 Precinct 2
*Dona P�ae Odl and
Donna Christenson
Jean Johnson
Darlene Vallin
Velma Farr
Alice Anderson
Ward 3 Precinct 3
*Gladys Syerson
Bev �4i 11 er
Laverne Roseth
Betty Nelson
Florence Gordon
Gemaine Wolsfeld
R 6340 Monroe Street
R 901 West Moore Lake Dr
R 6331 Monroe Street
D 5665 Jackson Street
D 5837 Washington Street
� 6230 Carol Drive
D 6665 Arthur Street
D 1581 Dana Court
D 6631 Lucia Lane
R 6805 Channel Road
R 6680 Anoka Street
R 6850 Siverts Lane
R 5630 West Danube
R 5940 Stinson Blvd
R 1464 North Danube
D 5510 Matterhorn Drive
D 565 West Bavarian Pass
D 1650 Briardale Road
D 5216 Taylor Street
D 6720 Regis Drive
D 5180 Lincoln Street
R 1527 Windemere Circle
R 1587 Windemere Drive
R 1473 Trollhagen
D
D
D
R
R
R
D
D
D
', R
R
R
R
R
R
D
D
D
601 Glencoe
386 Longfellow
7948 East River Road
7800 East River Road
170 Hartman Circle
600 Glencoe
6244 Alden Way
173 Riversedge Way
136 Horizon Drive
159 - 63 2 Way
157 Riversedge Way
230 Rice Creek Blvd
117 - 53rd Avenue
401 - 53rd Avenue
4532 - 2nd Street
5129 Horizon Drive
4642 - 3rd Street
157 Crown Road
571-2078
571-3660
571-2856
571-4465
571-7943
571-6912
571-9697
574-9902
574-0203
574-9676
571-6196
571-8267
574-1876
571-4660
574-1064
574-0218
571-0934
571-6736
571-6960
571-5920
571-8331
571-3318
571-801 £i
571-7172
786-8321
784-0302
784-6536
571-7980
571-6038
786-5843
571-4292
571-3914
572-1017 -
574-9436
571-4002
571-3491
572-1041
572-8094
572-1706
572-9535
572-8852
572-1044
13 A
Page 3- Resolution No. - 1982
Health Care Center
Dorothy Veres 0 5608 - 4th Street 571-0479
Norma Rust R 5735 Quincy Street 571-5735
SECTION 5. That the following judges are appointed to act as chairmen of
the Election Soard for the precincts designated and shall have
the duties set forth in Section 203.23 of Minnesota Statutes.
Ward 1 Precinct 1 Carolyn Holmen
Ward 1 Precinct 2 Joyce McLellan
Ward 1 Precinct 3 Charlene Swanson
Ward 2 Precinct 1 Virginia Steinmetz
Ward 2 Precinct 2 Jeanette Micholski
Ward 2 Precinct 3A Virginia Bureau
Ward 2 Precinct 3B Judy Engegretson
Ward 3 Precinct 1 Betty Bonine
Ward 3 Precinct 2 Dona Mae Odland
�ard 3 Precinct 3 Gladys Syerson
SECTIOiJ 6. Compensation for said Judges will be paid at the rate of $3.35
per hour for Regular Judges and $4.35 for the Chairmen of the
Election Board.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY
�F , 1982.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - Sidney C. Inman
MAYOR - WILLIA��1 J. NEE
13 �
TME CITY OF
FRII�L Y
DATE Janu
FROM D.P.W. Jo
,SUBJECT
a
!�
DIRECTORATE
OF
PUBLIC WORKS
li
Sigrral Improvement
East River Road and 43rd Avenue
TO
Nasim M. Quresh_i
14 �
M EMO R A N D UM
itv M
ACTION I INFO•
At the City Council meeting of January 4, 1982, the Council approved
the agreement with Anoka County to share in the costs of signal improve-
ment� at the intersection of East River Road and 43rd Avenue
The City's share of this improvement is $10,800. The project is being
considered for Great River Road Funds and the County has not requested
State Aid funds for this signal installation. Accordingly, the City is .
authorized to request its entire share to be covered by Municipal State
Aid Funds.
The attached resolution requests Municipal State Aid Funds from the Minne-
_sota Department of Transportation for this improvement
Recommend City Council approve the resolution.
JGF:ijk
e
6
�o�x �. — �sa
A RF�O�ION l�IINICIPAL STATE AID FONDS
� C.S.A.H. PRO►T�CT ND. 02-601-26
BE IT RESOLVID by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County,
Minnesota, as follaws:
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of
Fridley to participate in the cost of a traffic signal construction
project located on C.S.A.H. No. 1, (East River Road) and C.S.A.A. �2 (43rd
Ave.) within the limits of said municipality, and
WHERFAS, said construction project has be� approved by the Departmen� of
Higl�ays and identified in its records as S.P. No. 02-fi01-26.
Ia7W, 7�IEREFiURE, BE IT RF�90LVID: That we do hereby appropriate from our
Municipal State-Aid Funds the sum of 10,800 dollars to apply toward the
canstruction of said project and request the Canmissioner of Highways to
approve this authorization. —
PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY �UNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
L1AY OF , 1982.
A'[TEST:
SIDNEY C. ]NNlAN - CITY CLF�RK
5/22
6
�
WII,LIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
9 �
� - _ _ i
�
, _
1
14 A
�
- .I5
TNE GIT�/ OF
DIRECTORATE o0
�
OF °o 0
MEMOAANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS � �
. _� .
�olt'�L Y
iATE January 5, 1982
flOM D.P.W. Mark B
UBJECT
Works Director
Reclassification of the Inter-
section Improvement at 73rd
� Avenue &� University Avenue,
from St. Imp. Project St. 1981-2
' to St. 1982-2
TO
ACTION� INFO-
We will be constructing the intersection improvement at 73rd Avenue
and University Avenue during the 1982 construction season under Street
Improvement Project St. 1982-2. This project was initiated under
St. 1981-2 in 1981 by the City Council; but design, MnDOT approval and
funding complications delayed the project until this year.
_ MLB:ijk
Reference:
Resolution No. 12-1981 - A Resolution Ordering Preliminary Plans, Specifi-
cations and Estimates of the Costs Thereof: Street Improvement Project
St. 1981-2 . �
Resolution No. 13-1981 - A Resolution Receiving the Preliminary Report and
Setting the Public Hearing on the Matter of Construction of Certain Improve-
ments: Street Improvement Project St. 1981-2
*Resolution No. 31-1981 - A Resolution Ordering Improvement and Final Plans
and Specifications and Estimates of Costs Thereof: Street Improvement
Project No. St. 1981-2
Resolution No. 32-1981 - A Resolution Ordering Improvement Approval�of Plans
and Ordering Advertisement for 8ids: Street Improvement Project No. St.
1981-2
*This resolution refers to 73rd Avenue traffic signal inclusion in 1982
Street Improvement Project. _
cc: CM
Pat Sykes ✓ _ , . . _
�
i � �.
, ....._
,
�- ;
._.._
15 A
�so�nzoN r�. - �sa
A RE90LU1'ION RENl�Ir1ING A PORTION OF THE ST. 1981-2
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJSCT (THE INTERSECTION
AT 73� AVIIBUE At�ID D�NIVERSIR'Y AVSNUE) �0
�E ST. 1982-2 S�P II�3ZOVT�TP PRD►T�.T
WHII2EAS, the intersection improvement at 73rd Avenue and University Avenue
was initiated under the ST. 1981-2 Street Improven►ent Project, and
W!�iF,RF',AS, �e to desicpl, MnI)OT approval and funding complications, this
portion of the ST. 1981-2 Street Improvement Project was delayed, and
V�kiERF�AS, City Resolution 31-1981 authorized c7eferment of this improvement
to 1982, and
WHEREAS, it is desirable from an administrative and cost savings
standpoint to have all street assessment rolls expiring in the same year
carry the same furid code.
NOW, 7�iEREFiORE, BE IT RF50LVID by the Council of the City of Fridley that
the portion of the S'P. 1981-2 Street Improvement Project involving the
intersection improvement at 73rd Avenue and University Avenue is hereby
renamed and shall be known as the ST. 1982-2 Street Improvement Project,
and that the necessary journal entries reflecting this change of status be
made.
PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DiAY OF . 1982.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTF�T :
SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLF�RK
5/26
I Tf+� ciYV oF
� FRIDLE
DATE
FROM �.P.W.
SUBJECT
DIRECTORATE
OF
PUBLIC WORKS
�
Miscellaneous Concrete Curb,
Gutter and Sidewalk Construction
for 1982
TO
16 'r
,
MEMO R AN DUM
ACTION! INFO•
Annually, the City advertises for bids for the removal and replacement
of misce1laneous concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks. We have prepared
the contract for the 1982 construction season.
In order to obtain satisfactory bids, we should advertise this project
early to enable us to obtain the best rates and be able to initiate cons-
truction as soon as the weather breaks.
Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution ordering:the
improvement, plans and advertising for bids for the subject work.
JGF:ijk
.
'
x�sor�rTa� �. — �s2
•�.. � . .•.�:,� � �,••.. � �� �•..� � .- � ��
n ••�• � �� :�+. f � .�. � .�, �.. ,
� �+� � •� i;� • • ��:� � i�� � •r �� . . ��r,: r �• �
i � f �.
W�IF.REAS, the construction of certain improveqnents is deened to be in the
interest of the City of Fridley and the property awners affected thereby.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID, by the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follaws:
1. TY�at the follawing im�xovements proposed are hereby ordered to be
effected and completed as required:
R�noval and replacement of misoellaneous concrete curb, gutter and
sidewalk - 1982.
2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Director
for such improvements, a copy of which plans and specifications are
hereto attachec3 and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and shall
be filed with the City Clerk.
The Public Works Director shall accordingly prepare and cause to be
inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bic7s upon the making
of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three (3) v�eks (at least 21 days) ,
�a sn�.i specify the work to be done and will state that bic7s will be
opened at 11:00 A.M. on the 9th day of February 1982 in the Counc il
Chambers of the City Aall, and that no bids will be considered unless
sealed and filed with the Public Works Director. T'hat the advertisement
for bids for REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS OONCRETE CURB,
GUTTE�t AI�ID SIDEWALK - 1982 shall be substantially in the standard form.
PASSID AND ADOPTE� BY THE CITY O�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
LIAY OF , 1982.
ATI'E�!':
�
SIDNEY C. INM1�N - CITY CIFRK
5/27
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
16 �
'
'
�
��� �• � : �� � a•
• ✓ � 1 • �' � •i I} � ' `r:+ � I:+� 1
•� •' •1 '�: FI ��+' • 1 1� r �• '
Sealec3 bids will be received and publicly cpened by the City of Fridley,
Anoka County, Minnesota, at the offioe of the Public Works Director, 6431
University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota �5432 (Tel. 571-3450) on the 9'ID
day of FEBROARY, 1982, at 11:00 a.m., for the furnishing of work and
materials for R�'VAL AND REPIACEI�IENT OF �II9CII.LANDOOS CORB, GU'1'TER APID
SIDE�IR
2,000 lin. ft.
3,000 sq. ft.
�Iiscellaneous Concrete C�rb & Gutter
Renoval & Replacement
Construct 5 ft. wide x 4 inch sidewalk
All in acoordance with plans and specifications prepared by John G. Flora,
P.E., Public Works Director, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E.,
Fridley, NID] 55432 (Tel. 571-3450) .
Plans and specifications may be examined at the offive of the Public Works
Director and copies may be obtained for the Contractor's individua 1 use by
applying to the Public Works Director and depositing with the Public Works
Director $25.00 for each set. �he deposit will be refunded to each bidder
submitting a bona fide bid upon return of the documents in good condition
within ten (10) days from the bid opening date.
Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, and accompanied by
a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of
Minnesota) or a bidc3er's bond made payable without condition to the City of
Fridley, N�1, in an amount of not less than five (5$) per cent of the total
amount of the bid.
The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive
any inforn�alities in any bids received without expl.anation.
No bid may be withdrawn for a peria; of thirty (30) days.
By order of the City Caancil of the City of Fridley, Minnesota.
Dated the day of ,__._., 1982.
� ����-�
ohn G. Flora, P.E.
' ' PUBLIC kARKS DIRDCIOR
Published: Fridley �n
January 20� 1982
January 27, 1982
February 3, 1982
I
Construction Bulletin
January 22, 1982
January 29, 1982
February 5, 1982
16 �
�
0
F�R CONCURRENCE �Y THE CITY COUNCIL - ��pIh�S
C
CLAI�1 �JUMBERS
360E1_2 - O11,T0�� --
)
1
f
�
�.
17
. ._. _ _. ._.__ _...__ 1
U� �
� F.OR CONCURRENCE 8Y TNE CITY COUNCIL - LICENSES
January 18, 1982 Residential Rental Property
�.
OWNER LOCATION OF BLDG. UNITS FEE APPROUED BY
Donald Findell 110 - 58th Ave. NE 1 $12.00 Steven J. Olson,
6676 Central NE Environ.Ofcr.
Fridley, MN 55432
Margaret Hendley 5800 - 4th St. NE 4 36.00 Steven J. Olson,
118 Craig Way Environ.Ofcr.
Fridley, MN 55432
Donald Findell 7890 Broad Ave. NE 1 12.00 Steven J. Olson,
6676 Central NE Environ.Ofcr:
Fridley, MN 55432
Donald Findell 6634 Central Ave. NE 10 49.00 Steven J. Olson,
6676 Central NE - Environ.Ofcr.
Fridley, MN 55432
same owner as above 6640 Central Ave. NE — 1 12.00 Steven J. Olson
Steven Chies
8624 Miss. Blvd. NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
7349-51 University Ave. NE
(See attached Memo)
�
2
Environ.Ofcr. �
24.00 Steven J. Olson,
Environ.Ofcr.
i
�_ , . �
�
� '
� . .
TME GITY Q�
FRI[�L Y
DIRECTOAATE
OF
PUBLIC WORKS
DATE January 5, 1981
FR�M D.P.W. Steven J. Olson
3UBJECT
Recoanmendinq Approval of Residential Rental
ILicense for 7349-51 University Avenue N.E.
TO
John Flora
. �
MEMO R A N D UM
ACTIONI INFO•
On March 19, 1981 a citation was issued to Mr. Steven Chies for failure to apply for and
receive a license to operate the above listed address as rental property. On December 9,
1981 Mr. Chies was found "guilty" as charged and required to apply for and receive a
license within 45 days or pay a fine of $100.00 and serve 15 days. HS.s application and
fee was received on Decenber 29, 1981.
At this time there is an additional citation pending on this property for failure to
provide a hard surfaced driveway and parking area. This should go to trial in Febx�uary or
March of 1982. It is my feeling that we can recanmend approval of this li.cense and wait
and see how we do in court.
I am not aware of any other violations on this property. If any questions arise, please
call on me.
� SJO/mh
0 18B
� F.OR CONCURRENCE SY THE CITY COUNCIL - LICENSES
JANUARY 18, 1982 '
GAS SERVICES APPROVED BY
Centraire, Inc.
•13025 Pioneer Trail WILLIAM SAIdDIN
Eden Prairie, NII�1 55344 By: John Koepcke - Plbg.-Htg. Insp.
HE ATING
Centraire, Inc. • �
13025 Pioneer Trail L7ILLIAf4 SANDIN
Eden Prairie, NIIJ 55344 By: John Koepcke Plbg,-Htg. Insp.
Fred Vogt & Company
3260 Gorham Avenue I�ILLiAA4 SANDIN
St. Louis Park, MN 55426 By: Alan Malley Plbg.-Iitg. Insp.
0
�
'
° 18 C
�� F.OR CONCURRENCE BY THE CiTY COU�ICIL — LICE�SES
January 18, 1982
T�pe of License: �: Approved By: Fees:
Pizza Town Twin City Novelty James P.Hill $12.00
7891 E. River Rd. Public Safety Director
fridley, Mn.55432
0
�
'
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - ESTIMfiTES
Herrick & Newman, P.A.
6279 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
For legal services rendered as City Attorney
for the month of December, 1981
Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Naskvitz
1250 Builders Exchange Building
Minneapolis, MN 55402
For legal services rendered as Prosecutor
for the month of December, 1981
E.A. Hickok & Associates, Inc.
545 Indian Mound
Wayzata, MN 55391
^ Professional services, December 1981,
Moore Lake Restoration Project
�
�1,993.57
$3,146.25
$4,331.42
19
-
VIR61L C. NERRICN
DAVID P.NEWMAN
HERRICK & NEWMAN, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
January 8, 1982
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
December Retainer:
Hours in Excess of 30 at $45.00 per hour:
INVOICE N0. 737 — $2651.25 78•77
Payment -2651.25
EXPENSES ADVANCED:
Registrar of Titles (Filing Fee re Bergstrom):
12 xerox copies:
BALANCE DUE:
�
- - . i
� -
_ � _
,
i
;.
19 A
627C UNIVER5ITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIOLEY� MINNESOTA 55432
57i-3850
$1650.00
252.00
78.77
11.00
1.80
$1993.57
�� �
STATEMENT
SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON & HASKVITZ
ATTORNEVS AT LAW
1250 BUILDERS EXCHANGE BLDG.
MINNEAPOl.15, iMINNESOTA 55402
- 339-1481
SUBURBAN OFFICE
FRIDLEV
rCi ty of Fri dl ey �
6431 University Avenue N. E.
Fridley, P+linnesota 55432
Attention: Mr. Nasim Qureshi,
L City Manager J
C�N rLtAfE R<TURN TNIL �ORTIOM M'�TM rOYI� �ArYtMT
DATE � � � � BALANCE
FORWARDED FROh". LAST STATEMENT
1-11-82 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the
City of Fridley during December, 1981.
Representation of City of Fridley in court 12-01-81 (Fridley),
12-10-81 (Anoka), 12-10-81 (CoTumbia Heights), 12-16-81 (Fridley;
12-17-81 (Columbia Heights) and 12-21-81 (Fridley) for 16 pre-
jury trial conferences, 18 jury trials, and 41 court trials.
(41 hours).
Processing complaints including two citizen office conferences
and preparation of 51 formal criminal complaints.
(20 hours - 15 minutes).
Administrative meeting with police department supervisors.
(2 hours). Total Time (63 hours - 15 minutes).
December, 1981 Retainer $1,650.00 $1,650.00
Time in excess of retainer 1,496.25 $3,146.25
(33 hours - 15 minutes).
SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON & HASKVIT2
wrrownsvswT �wr