The URL can be used to link to this page

06/18/1984 - 5208,. OFFICIAL CITY �iJNCIL AIGETiAA Q7CTDiCIL MEETIIVG JUNE 18, 1984 / , . FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: June 18, 1984 � NAME ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � ,f �/ %— � � --.--- ��7( l �v - �/� .7' 'y � �(� 1 .�� 7'� r� . �i � � V :iC—�G_. �..e,� ..F'/:.,.. �'�^ 1,/ �.,,—JZ%< . � . `, � "�r '�� d� � � M � ;� ,.. a � � . � '°' ._..% �`:-�C�" ,�.%'�_� � � �� y_ �i r G-, ��-�,�,. 3S� �� ,_t f,�. , • � . I . �('1 � � �' � : , , , �� jf' (.J�� ;_ � � + ti ; : '� , �' ! ✓ F i � . _ � . _� f�,.� �` f // %— � /� � . � , �� . -, ; �� ,��' ;r; � _ � �"`' _,.�...- ."'��, �'�°�-� �' ° ,�, , ,-,�,. �' i� ��" � , ' , ► . �!✓ti'�Q r I .l,( % �' , : ._r. __ ' - l � e,. �lr `L �. �� ;� � J...r F <.. ....s.. _�.>t..t �.;.ti —� � � �' 7 c� ..�;3�„� ' _.J G- �-- �-' �',� � � �. ��,� :�_.�. -;� �_ � �, , �, � a% C � �?� .. -' ' . `"r•' �' _. •� -' , ;- � �U � �� av -- �'�� _� ✓e; /�� / Ss-.C�,��,�.�G>� : � -,� � J � � ,...� , � . . , ► 0 FRIDLEY CI TY COU N CIL JUNE 18. 1984 - 7:30 P.M. BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING, .1UNE 4. 1984 Approved CITY COUNCIL MEET{NG. .1UNE 4. 1984 Approved �1�' 1 � ' I' ��. Added: Considerat.ion of variance request on test points on cable system � iCONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA — 15 MINUTES) 3ohn Gargaro, presented letter from '49ers of thank you to Council � COUNCIL MEETING. JUNE 18. 1984 � ' ,: � � i�11� PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Hearing opened at 7:48 P.M. Continued to meeting of July 2, 1984 CENTRAL SERVICES-- ACTION TAKEN: Item will be on the next agenda. . PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • 2 Hearing opened at 8:05. Continued to meeting of July 2, 1984 CENTRAL SERVICES - ACTIO�� TAKEN: Item will be on the next agenda. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET (MPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1984-1 (ADDENDUM i�3)(CAPITOL STREET) . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 D Hearing opened at 8:06 P.M. Closed at 8:45 P.M. CENT'AL SERVICES--NO ACTION AT THIS TIME. RESOLUTIONS TABLED TO JULY 2, 1984 PUBLIC HEARING. ZOA #�84-02. TO REZONE LOTS BETWEEN ASHTON AND EAST RIVER ROAD FROM R-1 TO R-3. BY ROBERT DEGARONER . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 4 - 4 E Hearinc; opened at 8:46 P.M. Closed at 9:30 P.M. ' ''" PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance placed on agenda of July 2, 1984. PAGE 3 1BLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF A CABLE RATE �NCREASE. .. 5— 5 P Hearing opened at 9:31 P.M. Item referred to Cable Cor�nission and the hearing continued until their report is read. t �. PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Item forwarded to Cable Commission. Public hearing to be continue on July 2, 1984 agenda. 0 ONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �84-07. OR AN ADDITION AT 6875 UNIVERSITY AVENUE. 8Y �OODCREST CHURCH (TABLED 6/4/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 — 6 N Special Use Permit approved with stipulations PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Applicant Inform of Council Approval stipulations. � RECEIVING MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION OF JutvE 6. 1984 ........................... 7-7N A. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #84-10. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE IN CRP-2 ZONING (FLOOD FRINGE). 650 E�Y STREET BY MARY ERICKSON............ 7— 7B PieNNitir, CnMMIS510N RECOMMENDATI_D� APPROVAL 8 7H — 7� WITH STIPULATIONS. � CONSIDERATION OF COMMENOA710N Special Use Permit approved with stiuplations PUBLIC WCFKS--ACTION TAKEPJ• Applicant Inform of Council Approval s_ti�u�attons. � ► � � � ► � � (PLANNtNG COMMISSIOM MINUTES CONTINUEDi B. LOT SPLIT REDUEST L.S. #84-07. TO SPLIT LOT 5. BLOCK 4. CITY VIEW. AND ADD HALF TO LOT 4 AND HALF TO LOT 6. AT 411 AND 415 57TH PLACE NE BRANDONCONSTRUCTION CO ............................. e�.ANNIN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS COUNCI� ACTtON NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION Int So1it Reouest ao�roved with stipulations 7E - 7F 87K-7N PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Applicant Informed of Council approval with stioulations. RECEIVIN6 THE MINUTES OF THE CABLE TELEVISION MEETING M I NUTES OF MAY 17. 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . • • . • • • . . Minutes received ' PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN:�Minutes filed__ _ ___..__ ^.. _._' _ - --- - - „ I ADDED ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE ON TEST POINTS ON CABLE SYSTEtt. . . : . . . 8.1 BL-IC WORKS--ACTION 7AKEN: Company informed of variance approval . P�� , RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1984 SEALCOATING PROJECT ST,1984-10 (BIDS OPENED- �UNE 12. 11: 00 A. M. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 A Bids received. Contract awarded to low bidder--Allied Blacktop PUBLIC WORKS —ACTION TAKEN: All bidders informed of Council awarding of contract. RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM (OPTICOM) (BIDS OPENED �UNE 13. 1984. 11:00A.M.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . 10- 10B Bids received. Contract awarded to 3 M Company FIRE DEPT. --ACTION TAKEN: The bidder has been notified, and P.O. has been issued ordering project. � PAGE 5 ONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CALLtNG A PUBLIC NEARtNG N A PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE AND FINANCE AN INDUSTRIAL EVELOPMENT PROJECT iNORTH FREEWAY INVESTORSi. ....�.. .. 1i - 11 C Resolution N� ��-�QRa a�nnted CENTRAL SERVICE-•ACTION TAKEN: Arrangements have been made for the public hearing. �NSIDERATlON OF A RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING I A PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE ANO FINANCE AN INDUSTRIAL VELOPMENT PROJECT (RIVER ROAD JNVESTORS) . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 A Resolution No. 72-1984 adopted CENTRAL SERVICE- ACTIOPJ TAKE�a: Arrangements have been made for the public hearing. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET (MPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-1 $ 1983-2 ..... 13 - 13 A Resolution tabled - - . .. .. PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Resolution placed on agenda'for consideration at continued public hearing on July 2, 1984. CONSID�RATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMlNG ASSFSSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4. ......... 14 - 14 A Resolution tabled PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Resolution placed on agenda for consideration on uly 2, 1984 continued public hearing. ,� COUNCIL MEETING, JUNE 18. 1984 ; � � � PAGE 6 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERtNG IMPROVE- MENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF. STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No. ST. 1984-1 b 2 (ADDENDUM �03) . . . . . . . • • • : '.• • • 15 Resolution tabled PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Item placed on July 2, 1984 agenda for consideration CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND APPROVING CHANGE ORDER N0, 1 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (ADDENDUM �3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 C Resolution tabled I PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Item placed on July 2, 1984 agenda for consideration l';P^�'` I NTMENT : C I TY EMPLOYEE . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • � 17 Alana Herrmann, Data Input Clerk and � David Fraser, Police Officer appointed by Council , ACTION TAKEN: Accounting informed of new employees ESTIMATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 — 18 C Approved CENTRAL SERVICE-- _AC�T�N: Estimates paid. L� CEtvsES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 B Approved CENTRAL SERVICE-- ACTIOtJ TAKEN: Licenses issued. CLAIMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Approved CENTRAL SERVICE--, ACTI.Ot� TAKEN: Claims Paid. '1 � J�► � �� . COUNCIL MEETING. .1UNE 18. 1984 '�: � ■ `► 1_ PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PRO,�ECT ST. 1983-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 �. PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJ E CT ST . 1983-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST, 1984-1 (ADDENDUM #3)(CAPITOL STREET) . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 D PUBLIC HEARING, ZOA �84-02. TO REZONE LOTS BETWEEN ASHTON AND EAST RIVER ROAD FROM R-1 TO R-3, BY ROBERT DEGARDNER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . 4 - 4 E 1 � � � 1 � (PLANNiNG COMMISSION MINUTES CONTINUED) B. LOT SPLIT REQUEST L.S. �84-07. TO SPLIT LoT 5. BLOCK 4, CITY VIEW. AND ADD HALF TO LOT �� 4 AND HALF TO LOT 6. AT 411 AND 415 57TH P�ACE NE BRANDONCONSTRUCTION CO ............................. 7E - 7F PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL b 7K - 7N WITH STIPULATIONS COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CABLE TELEVISION MEETING M! NUTES OF Mp,Y 17. 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 U RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1984 SEALCOATING PROJECT ST,1984-10 (BIDS OPENED �UNE 12, 11: 00 A. M. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 A 0 ,RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM (OPTICOM) (BIDS OPENED JUNE 13. 1984, 11: 00 A. M. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 B COUNCIL MEETING. �UNE 18. 1984 L_.—'-_ ► • �] PA�E 6 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVE- MENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF. STREET (MPROVEMENT PROJECT No, ST. 1984-1 b 2 (ADDENDUM #3) . . . . . . . . . . .'". . . 15 , CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND APPROVING CHANGE ORDER N0, 1 FOR STREET (MPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST. 1984-1 AND 2 (AODENDUM �3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 C IAPPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �7 I EST IMATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 C I L I CENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 B � CLA I MS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 � �1 1 ;\ ,� 7HE ��tINUTES OF THE CONTINUED BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1984 4,� v I�� 4� • y,�_ !�� 1�. �� : � � : � � : �1� �,� MI�I� �,. • 11�! Z'he meeting of the Board of Review, which was continued from May 21, 1984, was called to order by Mayor Nee at 7:40 p.m. � �±� . = a = �.« Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Aa.legiance to the Flag. .� i NID�g�.S pRFSENT: Mayor Nee, Councilm��n Barnette, Councilman Schneic3er Councilman Hamernik and Councilman Fitzpatrick �'�'BERS ABSII+]T: None � ' ��!� ii � M �\� �y� M i • • MDTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes of the Boarc3 of Review Meeting of May 21, 1984 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee stated this meeting had been continued f rom May 21 as questions were raised which required a report fram the Assessor's Office. He stated, _ after reviewing the report, he felt the Assessor's Office did an exceptionally good job in review and comparisons of properties on which questions had been raised. Zt�e Board of Review took action regarding the follawing properties: ;. � .�. � �• '' .: �=�_•- :•.. Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated an appraisal was made on this property and camparisons made of four similar properties. Mr. Madsen stated the evidence of the c�mparables supports the value of $142,400 placed on the property and would recommiend no change in the market value. Mr. Madsen stated the owner was notif ied of this reco�rnnendation. Mr. Gupta was not present to offer any comments regarding the reco�¢nendation. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to sustain the value of $142,400 placed on this property as recommended by the Assessor's Office. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, al.l voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . ,,. . _ _. - : • . � =� Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this property was one where they couldn't gain ac�nittance and an arbitrary appraisal was cbne o� it. He stated, after the May 21 meeting, they were able to obtain access to the property and found a nimiber of improvPSnents, but these still w�oulc�'t increase the value up to $82,200. Mr. Madsen stated a change, therefore, is recommended in this value to :_� , ; � • : �1/ �;� �l?!� M�. � 1)�I � a 8 reduce it by $4,300 fran $82,200 to $77,900. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to sustain the reduction in value of this property at 5589 6th Street and reduce it by $4,300 fran $82,200 to $77,900. Seconded by Councilman Ha�nernik. Upon a voice vote, all v,oting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. : �. . . — �_ •— �1 ; — z, =._ — . -.� • . 1 ;_ — —— :• — • Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, statecl a review was made of this property and it was found that the creek doesn't flow by this property. He stated there isn't any water at all between the property and what had been an island which is now low, wet land. He stated he didn't feel this should be considered a creek lot at this time. Mr. Madsen stated the two properties immediately to the north of this property at 236 and 230 Rice Creek Boulevard also have the same problem and felt their value should be reduced since they w�uldn't be considered creek lots. None of the owners of these three properties were present at this meeting. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office to reduce the values of the properties at 240, 236, and 230 Rice Creek Boulevard as follaws: 240 Rice Creek Boulevarci - reduce value from $134,600 to $127,000 236 Rice Creek Boulevard - reduce value fram $114,900 to $106,600 230 Rice Creek Boulevard - reduce value fran $ 87,600 to $80,400 Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � : -�. �. 1 ,— — Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated in reviewing this property, it was approached in two different directions. He stated comgarisons were made of similar properties in the area and the value of $190,400 could be sup�orted. Hawever, because the current method of valuation unequally values split level hanes when they approach the 2,000 square f eet area, some work has been done over the last few w�eeks to oorrect this inequity and, using this means, woulc7 reco�unend the value be reduced from $190,400 to $175,500. Mr. & Mrs. Gill were present at the meeting and indicated they had no objection to the value of $175,500. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office to rec3uve the value on the property at 1401 Kerry Circle fran $190,400 to $175,500. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �� . — � ._� . 1 — . — � — -2- :�s ; � � _ : �� a,. 4��!�+�1�. • 1 )�i Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this property was reviewed and it was found there were a number of items in the home that weren't actually co�leted. He also stated the house is a split entry, but the basement is not a typical split foyer in that the grade slopes up to the rear, and the rear basement windaws are small. �� Mr. Madsen stated he would recarnnend a reduction in value by $2,500 fram $84,400 to $81,900. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office to reduce the value of the property at 1360 Fireside Drive by $2,500 fram $84,400 to $81,900. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. A�ron and Judith Enuebretson - 5216 Taylor Street: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this hane is a fairly typical split entry design and, basically, felt the hane or neighborhood hadn't changed since last fall. He stated there were three sales in the neighborhood that would support the value of $82,000. He stated the owner of this property, as well as the properties at 523 4 and 5250 Taylor Street, had brought up the question of the motel and how this has affected the value of their hanes. Mr. Madsen stated he felt it was too early to tell what affect the motel would have on these properties. Mrs. IIzgehretson stated her home is smaller than the home at 5234 Taylor Street and yet has a higher value. Mr. Madsen stated the home at 5234 Taylor is a rambler and Mrs. Engebretson's home is a split entry which is more practically developed into legal living space and has a higher value which is so�nething proven in the market. Mrs. E�gebretson stated she would disagree as she felt older people would tend to shy away form the steps in a split entry hame. Mr. Madsen stated the closest comg�rable hane is one located dawn the street fran this property and is also a split entry and recently sold f or $93,500 and has a value of $92,900 on the property. Mayor Nee stated the County Assessor's Office could review her property if she felt she wasn't satisifed with the City's value. Mr. Madsen stated it would be necessary for them to file a request for the County to review the property. MU'I'ION by Councilman H�nernik to concur with the reco��endation of the City Assessor's Office and sustain the value placed on this property at 5216 Taylor Street at $82,000. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. -3- :� } ,1� • ; �1� ?� 4� .��. � 1 )+� �� m„�,th� and Nk�v Jo McCauley - 5234 Taylor Street: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this property �as reviewed looking at the physical aspects and the neighborhood situation. He stated, as far as the neighborhood is concerned, he woulc7feel the same way as expressed for the property at 5216 Taylor Street and would recarnnend no change in the value of $81,500. Mr. McCauley stated if the cam�risons were made with other hanes that have a motel in their back yard, then he would support the value. He stated, hawever, he agrees they can't really tell the impact of the motel at this time, but his ooncern is several hanes on the block that have been for sale have not sold. Councilman Hamernik questioned haa the hames that border Holly Center were appraised as c�ompared to this area. Mr. Madsen stated about the same type of evaluation was cbne for both of these areas starting fran a base for the land and take into consideraion sane effects that do knaw have an impact on market value. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office and reco�anend no change in the value of the property at 5234 Taylor Street. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carriecl unanimously. �rton N Cross and Robert M Cross Lot 18. Block 23. �yde Park• Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated they reviewed this property and have considered all three lots as one parcel at least until there is some change in o�wnership. MpTIpN by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office that there be no change in the value of $6,400 placed on this lot. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Dona�d F Cisar - 540 Q�eri_Circle: Mr. Mac3sen, City Assessor, stated this property was reviewed and a decibel reading taken to check noise levels. He stated properties of similar value and in the neighborhood were also campared. Mr. Madsen stated, based on sales information and noise level readings, the Assessor's Office would recommend no change in the value placed on this property. M�TION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office and make no change in the value placed on this property at 540 Cl�eri Circle. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. rri and Doiores Larso (Heather Swanson) - 735 58th AvenLe: Mr. Mac3sen, City Assessor, stated a review was made of this property and there are a n�nber of items in need of improvement in order to bring the -4- :�, ; � � : �1� �;. ul�!��. • 11�� property up to its full market potential. He stated, therefore, a reduction of $5,900 is recomnended from $88,700 to $82,800. MO'I'ION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office to reduce the value of this property at 735 58th Avenue by $5.900 fram $88,700 to $82,800. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried ur�animously. C�r�s Je�evarov - 160 Mississippi Place: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this item was referred to the County Assessor's Office for their review of the property ancl they recommended no change in the value. • MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to sustain the value placed on this property at 160 Mississippi Place. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. i)pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. M?chael Boyer - 159 Longfe iow: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated the concern of this property awner was the condition of the industrial area adjacent to his property and this has been referred to the Public Works Department. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to sustain the value placed on the property at 159 Longfellow. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. rPonard Benser - 154 Lonc�fe??ow: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated the concern of this property awner was the same as Mr. Bayer's at 159 Longfellaw regarding the industrial property. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to sustain the value placed on the property at 154 Longfellaw. Seconded hy Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carriec3 unanimouslY- Wi�i�am and Gloria Job - 5250 Tavlor Street: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated they were not able to gain access to review the inside of this property, however, canparisons were made of three other hames in the area. He stated he would reco�runend the value of $107,500 be sustained. Mr. Francis Job stated his brother awns this property and he is now out of the country. M�JTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office and make no change in the value af $107,500 placed on this property at 5250 Taylor Street. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. -5- :�.� � � • ; ?►� �� ,��!�+yl�, • 1 1�� ' ' .� . ��_ •• 1• � _• _� � Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this property was reviewed and it was found there were some improvements in the basement since the last inspection. He stated they would not normally pick-up this improvement until the City's next scheduled inspection which wot�ld be in 1988, therefore, the value is understated as the house now stands. Mr. Madsen stated they would reconBnend the value of $103,400 placed on the property be sustained. Mr. Job stated if he can't sell it for market value, obviously, it isn't worth that much. He stated he had this hame up for sale and had to drop the price $10,000 dawn to $97,000 and he would f inance it at 8� interest and still could not find any buyers. Mayor Nee felt perhaps the County should review this property for an appraisal. Councilman Barnette thought all the property owners on Taylor Street may want a review of their property by the County. Mr. Starkey of the County Assessor's Office stated if it was reviewed by the County, they would either recananend no change, a decrease, or pc�ssibly an increase. He stated if the property awners wished to proceed to have the County review their properties, it would be necessary to submit a letter stating they disagreed with the value placed on the property. Counci].man Hamernik stated he didn't feel they could deal any differently with this property than any of the others on Taylor Street. He felt if the property awners still had concern, they could take measures to have a review by the County. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to sustain the recommenc7ation of the Assessor's Office and reco�rtnend no change in the value of $103,400 placed on this property at 5209 Taylor Street. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee felt it should be made a matter of record that some property owners on Taylor Street did not agree with the values placed on their properties and their rights were protected in order for them to appeal to the County. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting of the Board of Review. Secodned by Counci]man Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, al.l voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the m�tion carried unanimously and the Board of Review Meeting of June 4, 1984 adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Respectf ully subsnitted, Carole Haddad Recording Secretary Approved: -6- William J. Nee Mayor ,� THE �tINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1984 M,1 v I�i 1�4�'. � M+1 :��: � r: v1�1�1 1�. • 4.� �: �� M4 �� 1�. • � )�I �e Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor NeF at 8:50 p.m., after the meeting of the Board of Review. ;. v; MII�ERS PRESII�: Mayor Nee, Councilman Fitzgatrick, Oouncilman Hamernik, Councilman Schneider and Councilman Barnette MEr'BERS ABSEiVT: None � • ��11� � �_ �t�� i J\ 1!I 711_ 1,. 1! : •• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented. Se�:onded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � �.� • �� !: M�'IZON by Counci]man Schneic3er to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded i7y Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee de�clared the motion carried unanimously. • ' �� _ �� 4��+�'� Mr. Ed Wilmes, 200 CY�arles Street, stated the dedication of the bridge and parking area for the Islands of Peace will be this Saturday, June 9 at 10:00 a.m. and extended an invitation for all to attend. Mr. Wilmes stated recently a County Canmissioner stated the Islands of Feace wauld eventually be included in the new Anoka County Riverf ront Park. He rc-�quested everyone's sup�ort to keep the name of the Islands of Peace alive. • .� :_.��► �� • � �� .!+, �! : : �i�� . ��, y.i _ �. �� _ _ �� : ; �.��i� +, �, ; �+ ; � t Idy _�� i�L�: ' �� i� _ �u � - 4 � � � �I_ y'- 4 � �, �!4 �� . MCnION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 87.5 on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Fntzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mc�tion carried ananimously. � �� ?+: • • � • i : �?±�� M. ; : - � �� ; : � ; � � . � . : ��1�/?�� 44� � /��►l1 ��MC � ?: �� M�t1�s«, :: �� Gouncilman Hamernik stated there were several meetings last week with r�presentatives of the church anc� the residents of the neighborhood, and it has been requestec7 this item be tabled for two weeks to evaluate alternatives. M�TION by Councilman Hamernik to table this item until the next regular �� J►. 1 „��+M1�. • 1)�� douncil meeting on June 18, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. K �� : �� _ � �._• f� � . ��: '; u : , �.� M • � : � « «; �I�, ;,� � � ��9: : -.; ; : � v� a�� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, statecl this is a request to split off the rear portion of this lot at 1443 Rice Creek Boulevard. He stated the Planning Carnnission reviewed this request and had sane oonoern because there is not a road to the rear of this property to allow it to develop. He stated the Co�ranission recomanended approval with the stipulation the City is not obligated to furnish a road for this p�rcel. Councilman Schneider stated his concern, if this property was to develop in the future, is that all costs for necessary improvements would have to be borne by the awner of this property. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated in 1974 the Council adopted a plan tor this area where all properties would be assessed a total of $8/100 square foot for storm sewer. He stated the City would not be making any co�mutt�nent to put in a road by splitting the lot. He also pointed out the City has only a road easement and an additional 20 feet should be obtained for a drainage easement. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant lot split, LS #84-04 with the following stipulations: (1) the owner understands the parcel would be a landlocked lot; (2) by giving the lot split, the City makes no committment to provide a road or water or drainage system; (3) an additional 20 feet be given for a drainage easement; and (4) in regar8 to storm sewer, no properties outside the develognent would be assessed in excess of the total of $8.00 per 100 square feet for storm s�wer, and any additional costs would be borne by the developer of the property. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINFSS• : �M_ ��1�. ' _ �� . !! �!� • � � N�l 1�9 _ • _ � _ �I:LA . . �• 1 : �� M _ � � ; �i� ; a��,� � � 1�. � �_�ti M_ . :� �� .. • 4 " ��: � �� _�'��__+ .1�_y�--s:-� «rUC «+ Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated Redeemer Lutheran Church has requested a special use permit to allaw an ac7dition to their facilities. He stated they currently have the church and a builcling behind it and propose to re�nove a portion of that building and combine the entire facility in order to provide a fellawship hall and handicap access. Mr. Flora stated they have 259 parking stalls and with this oonstruction, it woulcl eluninate 16, but they will still be within the code requirements. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Catm�ission recommended apprwal of the special use permit with three stipulations regarding an appraved landscape plan, the new building should be c�npatible with the existing building and in harmony -2- e�. J�. � ��M1�. • 11�� with the residential character of the neighborhood, and the special use peYmit be subject to approval of the Rioe Creek Watershed District and City enqineering requirements. Mr. Flora stated one other stipulation should be the removal of the existing buf� and trailer off the site when vonstruction is canpleted. Mryt'ION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #84-08 with the follawing stipulations: (1) there be an approved landscape plan; (2) the finish of the new building should be c�at�atible with the existing building anc3 in harn�orYy with the residential character of the neighborhood; (3) the sp�ecial use permit be subject to approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District and City engineering requirements; and (4) the existing bus and tr�3iler be moved off the site when construction is canpleted. Seconded by Co��ncilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared th� motion carried unanimously. 48. Pi3FT TMTT��.sRY pLAT. P S#84-04. PLAZA rENTi'F'R ADDITION. BY HRA: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to set the hearing on this preliminary plat fo:r July 2, 1984. Seconded by Councilm�n Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � �'�1M� ��' �� i �� i � �i_.f 'i�i i • � � : /�+l �. � �� «t : � � h► �\ Mr. Flora Public Works Director, stated this is a request for a special use permit to locate a repair garage on property presently owned by Dayton- Hudson. He stated the Planning Ca�unission reca�m�ended approval of the special use permit with seven stipulations. Mr. Flora stated if the special use pennit is appraved, there will be a need for three variances which appears on the agenda later in the meeting. MC►TION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recomendation of the Planning Catanission and grant special use permit, SP �84-09 for a repair ga.rage to be located at 765 53rd Avenue with the following stipulations: (1.) an approved landscape plan be submitted to the City; (2) a manageable sl.ope must be left on the eastside of the lot not greater than 3:1; (3) if bad soils are found, petitioner must provide a soil alteration plan which ir.�cludes protection of the car wash property; (4) petitioner must agree to ha�ve no outside storage of cars or parts at any time; (5) require that the oF�eration manage their used oil or other hazardous waste through appropriate me�ans; (6) an approved drainage plan be required before a building permit is i�sued; and (7) this special use permit is issued to the awner and is not tr�ansferrable without approval by the Council. Seconded by Councilman S<:hneicler. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the m�tion c�rried unanimously. ' � �� 4 � �;� � . � � 1 . �� .� �;�• �� C : � �,1: = 1�. _� !.� ; C�� /��t ) � =� ; ►41�M4 �� _ «,ia1 -3- •� 1�. 1 v��M��, • 1)�� ' �� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is property zoned R-3 north of 73rd Avenue and across the street from Onan Corporation. He stated the petitioner is requesting zero lot lines in order to construct a double bungalav on the property. He stated the petitioner plans to own one half and her partner wil buy the other half. ,. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Canmission recommended approval of the lot split to allow zero lot lines, however, staff would like to add three stipulations which would include a signed covenant, park fee, and recording the lot split with the County. MpTION by Councilman Schneider to grant lot split, IS #84-06 to allow zero lot lines with the following stipulations: (1) a signed zero lot line covenant be expected; (2) a park fee paid of $750; and (3) the lot split and covenant be recorded with the County. Seconded t�y Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. My?+� �:,� M � • ��.u�� :► M� � �. • v � �%�i� �i �. : ��«_ � �:�. �_.� �� .�1� M �� \I� � JI� �_ � i � i \�� \� :i� ��:«� �� 0 � :�: • �� M* ' � � N� �+ Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is a request f or three variances to reduce the required lot size fran 35,000 square feet to 22.17 1 square feet; to reduce the required front yard setback f rom 80 to 66 feet; and to reduce the required rear yard setback f ran 40 to 10 feet. Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variances with several stigulations. He stated these stigulations were incorporated into the special use permit approved by the Council earlier this evening. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Canmission and grant the variances to reduce the lot size from 35.000 square feet to 22,171 square feet to reduce the f ront yard setback fran 80 feet to 66 feet; and to reduoe the rear yard setback from 40 feet to 10 feet for property at 765 53rd Avenue. Seconded by Councilman Fitzg�trick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unani.mously. Zl�e Council then received the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 1984. �+ � a= .� _ ; ��. �• c � :.•,._, • M�_ • �• • �+;+� �• : i a • ' � MOTION by Councilman Fitz�trick to set the hearing for disposal of City property for July 2, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. • ��:� , � • � � � . � • : ' C �� 1 _� M�. y.l �I�►� �! �IM �M_ s • z_ !� • 4 ti • ► �� h� � b�l__ u �i�l . �1_� s� , �! • � � �My;. � � 4 �� • _y. �► : � �►� �M : __ �. u ��d �A � � ,� _yif �� M,� : � � . � 1�f4_ �� ; 1�� ; s�:� �+s_';� •� -4- �� . . �i�� i�. • 11+� I�� Mr. Bill Doty, representing the Moundsview City Council, stated a petition has; been filed for an envirorunental worksheet to address the environmental is�;ues involved by expansion of the Anoka County-Blaine Airport. He stated the Metropolitan Airport Commission is the governmental unit establishec� to do this worksheet, hawever, they are atte�pting to get the ern�iror�ental board to reassign this task to the Minnesota Follution Control Age�ncy. He asked Fridley's sup�ort of this resolution in requesting the ern�iro�nental assessment worksheet be done by the MPCA. Councilman Schneider asked if Moundsview had incurred costs by adoption of th:is resolution. Mr. Doty stated there have been some legal expenses inaolved, as well as oosts to obtain background information on the airport. MpTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 64-1984. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee de��lared the motion carried unanimously. . • �i ; • • ; y: � _ � _ � �\ �� • � ►_ � N\. �i� �� : �i\ � .4 \N �1! � ��'4 �\I� �i!� � � �i • . MD�TION by Councilman Schneicler to adopt Resolution No. 65-1984. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, a12 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �___ � � + � � • • � i ' i � _ � \� � -!- • + • t : • � � \ � 1 � � � � e .��i�\ ,!� ,i� c i�+: � ��,��/a�,��.�� a.,� ��•� �i • . MCiTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 66-1984. Seconded by Cc�uncilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. : � .1� • � �:� • • ' � : ��l�N�. �� •: : � � � • ; a�. �r �M_ ; • �� : � • ��h�� !�� C�� ai4 � : � . . .- . _... - • • . . - . .-. . . � - .- .. . - . - . . - . - . -. - . . -. . � � � + \ � • � i ' � \... � � ' -i � + � R _ s 1 \ � � � ♦ � � � a i ��l.�,� i�� iy► _� y��1/�'��il� �s!� �y1� � . . M(7rI0N by Counci]man Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 68-1984. Seconded by G�uncilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C:_ �� ,1�� il �! • ' ' ' �_ �yi.� �_ _ ��. 4,1 ; : � _4�+�1�1�! • ' �� : ?ti. �! _ �iC� �� 4el ��.1��! � _ � � � : M�TIpN by Councilman Hamernik to acbpt Resolution No. 69-1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 1 • • � � • 1 • • r,� + : M �i ' y� �M9� �M_ �� M� �!_ • + � r� �l �i�t �� 4r�- �-- : � ' : , -5- �� A. 1 yI�1�M1�. � 11�� M�'I'ION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 70-1984. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all v�oting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Hamernik called attention to the fact that the words "Representative" and "Alternate" were cmitted fram the Co�cil's c3esicplation to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and should show that Councilman Fitzpatrick is the Representative and Counci]man Aamernik is the Alternate. 13. �.em�uATT(�T nF APARCyC�T. C�F PTAT�LG FnR CITY �NSTRUCTION I�RTEL_9F CITY HALL: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the architect has designed a garage/storage facility north of City Hall and the specif ications include an eight stall police garage and two storage areas of approximately 3,200 square feet. He statecl the vonstruction would also include a bridge over the existing driveway and a walkway connection between the plaza and Mississippi/University intersection. A schematic was presented which outlined the proposed construction. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated this oonstruction would be a joint venture between the City and the HRA and the City's share of the cost would be $70,000 plus $5,500 architectural fees or a total of $75,500. He stated the balance of the total oost of around $400,000 w�ould be paid by the I�A. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the conceptual drawings presented for the garage/storage facility north of City Hall. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. �I�S�ER�ITION OF A TF�KPORARY LICaENS��R 'r�' T.TFT AT 631 HIGHWAY �65 N.E. BY SOOTr HOI,MER: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated The Lift is requesting a license for a temporary trailer to be located to the rear af their store until such time as they can work on developing the entire parcel. He stated staff has been working with the awner of �e Lift on sane outstanding def iciencies and would suggest that they obtain a special use peYmit for outside storage or else to screen t-he area. He stated other areas which need attention are to screen the refuse container and to repair the steps and parking stall located on the side of the buildinq. Mr. Holmer, the petitioner and awner, stated as far as the refuse c�ntainer, it would be relocated. He stated the steps will be incorporated into the new loacling cbck between the two buildings. He questioned why the garden shop and boat storage area had to be screened. Mr. Flora explained The Lift does not have a special use pnerit for outside storage as required by the vode. He stated if they don't have this permit, screening is required. Mr. Holmer stated he felt a special use permit was granted for sc�ne of this property and would have to check into it further. � �� \� vf��M�t. � 1 i\� Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, statec] the City policy is not to allow trailers or temporary office space vnless there are construction plans or a program the�y are working tdwards. Mr. Holmer stated his ogtion to purchase this property will be ooming up in twc� years and, hopefully, their whole construction project . will take place at that time. He stated he is requesting the trailer permit for three years at this time as they have outgrawn their facility and neec7 temporary off ice sp�ce. Councilman Schneider asked what type of trailer he would be placing on the fa��ility and what it would look Iike. Mr. Holmer stated he hasn't selected the exact unit until he was sure if the tr,3iler permit would be approved. Mr. Qureshi statecl he felt a trailer with cedar siding would probably blend well with their operation. MO'TION tyy Councilman Schneider to approve the temporary trailer license for The Lift with the understanding it would be removec3 in three years. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. �T� MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the esti.mates as su4nitted. He�rrick & NeHmian, P.A. 6279 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, NQI 55432 For legal services rendered as City Prosecutor for the month af April, 1984 $ 1,763.65 Invoice No. 2419 of May, 1984 - Hazardous Waste Processing Srnith, Juster, Feikema, Malm�n & Haskvitz 1250 Builders Exchange Bldg. M:inneapolis, NII�T 55402 $ 1,186.35 For legal. services rendered as City Prosecutor for the month of Apri1, 1984 $ 6,725.00 H�lverson Construction Cbmpany 4227 165th Avenue N.E. W��aning, 1�J 55092 Estimate �1 1984 Misc. C�rb & Gutter Project F. F. Jed].icki, Inc. 14203 West 62nd Street Eden Prairie, NAI 55344 -7- $ 3,357.30 •� 1�. 1 �171�M1�. • 1 )�� E�StlI[Id�2 �1 Project �145 - Water & Sewer 7mp. $32,490.00 Secorxied by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee cieclared the motion carried unanimously. ,. 16. LI ,CE�E.' _ MDTION by Councilman �arnette to apprave the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. 5econded kyy Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17. S�AIN1�.�. MpTION by Councilman Barnette to authorize gayment of Claims No. 140518 through 153Z07. Seconded by Councilman H�nernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �� 1l�M� �\ i_ � \� � .91� � �_ � �i�M �i� �� i : � �� : V:� � � : �� M. «* : � �/: +ti � Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated this was a request to use Moore Lake park as the site for a picnic where 3.2 beer would be served. He stated because the ordinance prohibits beer in the beach area at Moore Lake, Mr. Walinski was advised to try and reserve a place at Locke Park for their celebration. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to receive the communica tion f rom Mr. Walinski. Seoonded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ' �.4�4?�� • M, � ��, � 44 • � ; ��y, � �! ; �� 4 • ��. =_ C N.M�� MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the letters of thanks f rom the cities of 5t. Anthony and New Brighton. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �Z�:�;�i ��F# MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of June 4, 1984 adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Cotuicil Approved: -8- William J. Nee Mayor CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1983-1 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley 1984, meet at the City Hall in said City on the 18th day of June, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon e��objections, any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the folloMing improvements, to-Nit: ' STREE7 IMPROYEMEN7 PROJECT ST. 1983-1 The proposed assessment roll for each file and open to public inspection by office of the Clerk of said City. of said improvements is now on all persons interested, in the At said hearing the Council wi11 consider written or oral objections to th� proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the con- struction of street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-m7x bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, parking lot, related landscape improvements, and other facilities located, as follows: 66th Avenue Northeast �4th Avenue �ity Hall Parking Lot �ridley P1aZa Central Avenue to 900 Feet East University Avenue to 5th Street 7he area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in pa�t proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten.(10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATEC� THIS 4th day of June , 1984, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIt OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY MAYOR W� iam J. Nee A7TEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman Publish: Fridley Sun on May 30, June 6, and June 14, 1984 1 2 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1983-4 �.. .. Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will �eet at the City Ha11 in said City on the 18th day of June, 1984, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the p�oposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. i983-4 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said heari�g the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the con- struction of street improvements inciuding grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services and other facilities located, as follows: O�sborne Road (Sidewalk on South Side): TH No. 65 to Central Ave. The ar�ea proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A proF►erty owner may appeat an assessment to the district•court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the d�strict court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATED THIS 4th DAY OF June , 1984, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY MAYOR William J. Nee ATTES7: CITY C�ERK Sidney C. Inman Publish: Fridley Sun on May 30, June 6, and June 13, 1984 3 OFFICIAL PI�LICATIrON QZ7C OF FR��Y ,. (E?�3IBIT Aj ' .�/Y M •' :I :: 1►. �.. �v�i:•�./?„la�l1• - . . �' �I 1 1' •,• � �} ' •�• 9 W�, the City Camcil of the City of Fridley, Anoka Countl'► 1�linnesota, has deeme�d it expedient to receive evidence pertaining to the improvements hereinafter described. �n1� 7�Igtg�pgE, AA'I'I� LS HERFBY GIVFI�I �IAT on the 18th day of June� 1984 at 7:30 c>'clock P.M. the City Council will meet at the City Hall in said City and will �t said time and plaoe hear all parties interested in said improvements in whnle or in part. �e general nature of the i�ravements is the oonstruction ( in the lands and streets noted belaw) of the following inpro�venents► t�wit: ��,► �IY*� .yY �,� Y�� Street i.�rovenents, including grading► stablilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer systesn, water and sanitary sewer servioes and other facilities located as follvws: ti � �� Capital Street Main St. to Hughes Ave. ES'TIMATID ODST 1984-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 50,440.00 �iAT 7�iE ARFA PROPOSID TO BE ASSESSm FOR SAID IN�ROVD�TIS IS AS FOLI�]S : For oonstruction Iten above All of the land abutting upon said streets named above and all lands within, ac3jaoent and abutting thereto. All of said land to be assessed proportionatPly aca�rding to the benef its received by such inprwenent. �at should the Coimcil prooeed with said improvements, they will consider each separate i�ravenents, except as hereafter otherwise provided by the Q�uncil all under the follvwing suthority, to-wit: 1''iinnesota Statutes 1961 • C�apter 429 and laws amendatory thereof, and in conformity with the City �arter. n.� c�T� o� OIiaECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS OATE May 3, 1984 FROM �.P.W. Mark Burch- Engineerin SUBJEC�p�tal Street Improvements . ��Ci MEMO N0. 84-65 TO John G. F1 3A M EMO R A N D UM ACTIONI tNFO• We received a petition signed by 8 of the 14 residents (57%) who live along Capital Street requesting that their street be improved with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous mat. The petition will be presented to the City Council on May 7th. If the Council decides to order a public hearing and ultimately order the improvements for construction in 1984 we would be able to add it to our existing contract without letting ne►v bids. MB/ de � CITY OF FRIDLEY •- PETITIUN GO�VER SHEET pe c t c i on N,� . 5-84 Date Received May 2, 1984 Obje�-c For Street, Curb and Gutter, and Storm Sewer Improvement _ along Capital Street petiKion Checked By Date percknt Signing Refexred to City Council ^ ._ Disp��si tion 0 3B 3C T�?I?IO/ !OR STREET. CflRB �D GD�'i'?ER �D STOR!! SE1i8R D4PR0��1RS � t1lIDLEi � !!I/)iE,SO?� �pril. 190� To tDe Cit� Co�uncil of Fridle�. Minnesota: The u�Q�r�is�d, peing a r�ority of the yroperty owners of tDe prbp�rtiea along Capitol Sthet� vhich xill Oeaefit py tbe proDoaed i�proveaents. bsr�b� petition that ator� s��r •iins pe provided ey tbe City froe tbeir ezistins locationa to •ccoa�at• t�e aDove referenced properties; �1.S0 that atreet isprovementa of adequate sectioeal Oi�ensioas, eonaiating of concrete curD aed sutter and Dituminoua surtacir�g pe pro�ided py tQe City on Capitol Street trom Main Strrei Lo Hughea Avenue. It is underataod that the coat of said iaprovements Mill be •asessed again�t the penefited propertiea as outlined in Ki�nesota Statutes Chapter �129•00. It !a al�o underatood tAat it la ispoasiDle at this ti�e to �ive an accurate eatimate of the cost of the ioprovementa berein petitioned; hovever� they are Aereby reQuested to De construr.ted at Lhe loveat Do�sible cost cosmenaurate vith prudent handling Dy the City in a normal a�se�sment proJect. The underaignr.0� Deing a u�ority of the property ownera who �ill penefit from aaid atreet, curb •nd gutter. and storm aever iaprovement pro�ect hereDy va2ve the righL to a puDlic k�earing for said improvement� �hich is alloved under the normal procedures se� forth in Ninne�ota Statutea Chapter �29.00. ., if ,��-�,y. �.� -4�-s�hy A�tBES� � , , 'i .5�� (.��r.�rrL. fT v sa v v �A r� {�� f c i —' i�� v. �.2 C �.(.lT-�.. .a�'�� - 'r � t ) s a �i - _ , js� y f�,� l t,�-� Y - a • . .� ' � � � • � � _ , � 3D . � , �, , At IM.'CORNER ` � � dEG js� s i 3 j �, t k� � �� . . s '' �is- ,.�►.iJ, �. �a1= .�. ` 9 sh� � .•;.s t;� ' - 1 � I ' s '� , I � r �� ' t �: � \ - � ! . ' � • � • '""" ~- , , • `� � , _�M... r . . •' ~ ,� - �Fi ltsl� ' � / + , � � �� ' 2 t� • '�« �w' `O � 1 -i � � � ss ZZ � �� j � . � �: • e � Ts � tt 90 . � ' ; I . _. � , . ' � ♦ �� r = �Zt 1 '• ` V — � w , .t :' � � . � � . u�l -- -� � - = �.. o 0 o s ,��., W , i j- , _. ; ;.. o0 00� � - f � , . � � � � o f . v; , -- . � � o°�o 0 0 0 ' ' � � 1•= �� '� ! o 0 0 ovoo 00 1•�� J p° o0 0 000 � S � � I�. . ,� °' �� , ��, ,:.- �' � � . . �o�o� o o�o ss�� Zj S Z3�0 2� � � ' ' 000 000 0�0 , ^� �o,00Q o00000 00 00 oa : -, i �p � � �".�' "', j�' �. 1� 0'+6� Zs t� � •* � � �► —�- +.� o o a S � L — . o � t� ` o 00 �., r � ° ° ° ° �� z17 tsP� Zo - , . . Y' " p p� ,*►, � - . � � �i ��. ��.� � � �. � ^ . _ Z1 ` " �� y � ' � ..�� - � q' Q -- � ' = ' _ ' � S� � � , � s1�9 V ' _T � � � rAd�t '� Si� / �p � • • - . � �� r /l � i - � � � rI � S\� ; S�s� ' t . -.,' � ; � � r � + � $ �2 1 ' t . • � •/ �� . — �20 � S1� 1 0 �t�� SIO �s d � _ •� 1 ' L�� t :� ' '� .. -• •. — � � � i � • �6 ` �7 � � . ��Z� ,� � � � A E . 'f s�.: F � ,� S�s • Se�s e �� — ; � � s � 34 11 c . � - _ � �� . Ze 7 s � �� , ' � \ : � �, � � _ �ZA ��. � - � � S �r � Mi. . �'. j �� , �� SA 1 � r . � � _ • . � . � - - R4- �`�� -.°� . .. ��+ � � � i � ' � - . ,`. : -� � ��,` .f -:_��Z �., � . ; r .: . ; �i Z � � , I : / " - ��' �s ,� So 13 5�0� :� ., �� = � e f � �� : ,: : ;., . .. L �� , 1- � � � t t ' - l �� - 4 PLANNI�JG COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 3 . Robinson stated this property was located on 3rd St. north of 58th Ave. Andrajack was proposing a second accessory building. the first one bei an attached garage. The second accessory building.will be located in lthe re yard. It would be approx. 528 sq, ft. with a 3 ft, side yard setback d a 5 ft. rear yard setback. This meets city code. He stated the only r uirement would be that the driveway up to the new garage be paved. Ms. Schnabel ask the petitioner. Mr. Andrajack. if he had any comments to make regarding '� request. .� Mr. Andrajack stated he ad no problem with paving the driveway. He stated the only change to his re est was the width of the garage from 22 ft, to 20 ft. He stated they wil ontinue to use the existing attached garage �as a garage. .� N10TION BY 1►1R. SABA, SEC�IDED BY '�SVANDA� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON :SP N84-06 $Y EDWARD ANDRAJACK. i�PON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIR SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC rF1EARING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.H. � �MOTIQN BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY HR. SVANDA, O RECOMMEND TD CITY COUNCIL ,APPROV.�L OF REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP 9-06, BY EDWARD ANDRAJACK, .PER SECTIDN 205.07.1, 3, A OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COD TO ALLOi9 THE CONSTRUC- TIDN OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING, A 20 FT. BY 24 F DETACNED GARAGE, ON I�OTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 22, HYDE PARK, TNE SAME BEIIJG 5832 STREET N.E., .WITH TNE STIPUTATIGW TXAT THE DRIVEWAY TO THE NEW STRUCTU BE PAVED. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLAREii�TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. �� Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on May 21. 1 3. PUBLIC HEARING• REZONIN6 REQUEST, ZOA #�84-Q2 BY ROBERT D. DEGARDNER: i�ezon�ro— m 1�T(one�a �mi 1-y�e � ngs to 1�-�3 �genera'i mu�ti p�e�c wel l i ngs ) part of Lots 3 and 21, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and l0, and Lots l4, 15, 16. 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 20, Fridley Park; and parts of Lots 3 and 24, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7 and 19,.20, 21, 22 and 23, Block 19, Fridley Park, to allow the development of a 52-unit condominium complex between East River Road and Ashton Avenue on 61st and 61 1/2 Way N.E. MOTIDN BY lKR. KANDRICK� SECCWDED BY MS. GABEL� TO OPEN TXE PUBLIC XEARING QIIV 20R N84-02 BY ROBERT D. DEGARDi'JER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL D�CLARED TNE PiJBLIC HE�iRING OPEN AT 7: 5 8 P. M. 4A PLANNING CONQ4ISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 __ __ _ PA_GE 4 Mr. Robinson stated the property was bordered on the south by 61st Ave.. Ashton on the east, East River Road on the west, and 62ad Wa�y on the north. The prpperty is surrounded by railroad property on the east. light industrial on the south, Stevenson School on the southwest, and single family. The rezoning request is for a change from R-1 to R-3. Mr. Robinson stated the reason for the rezoning to R-3 was for the creation of 13 four-plex type units (one•bedroom Loft Homes) attached at the corners. There would be a central green space, also green space surrounding the buildings, with parking. Ms. Schnabel asked how wide the lots were in this area. The petitioner, Mr. Robert DeG�rdner stated these are �0 ft, lots. 7hey would have to put two together to make one buildable lot. Mr, DeGardner stated he has lived in Fridley for 16 years and has built about 25 homes in Fridley over the years. He stated Mr. Maynard Nielson owns the property, and Mr. Nielson asked his opinion about this property. Mr. DeGardner stated he looked at the site and felt the property was not feasible for single family homes with light industrial, the railroad tracks, and some poor soil conditions. Mr. DeGardner stated he currently has three quad projects in Coon Rapids. He is proposing the Loft Home concept for this site. Loft Homes caters to single people and couples. It is a totally new concept. He stated the buildings are connected at the corners to make a nice garden apartment. Every apartment is ground level with patios, quality built, oak woodwork throughout, air conditioning, all appliances, and very affordable at $39,900. Mr. DeGardner stated that in looking at the site, he felt this was the most practical way to develop it. These buildings would make a nice buffer between the light industrial and the single family. Mr. Kondrick asked what the square footage was for each apartment. Mr. DeGardner stated each apartment was a little over 600 sq. ft. overall, which included a 16' x i2'loft bedroom which is open to the living room. Ms. Gabel asked if Mr. DeGardner would sell a block of these apartments to an investor who would rent out the units. Mr. DeGardner stated if stated they should have are investors who would rentals and there would apartment rentals. they get VA financing,they are limited to 5%, He no problem selling the units individually. There like to buy these blocks, but the units would be be an association so it would not be like other 48 PLANNING COMt4ISSI0N MEETING MAY 9 1984 PAGE 5 Ms. Schnabel stated she did visit the loft Homes in Coon Rapids and spent some time with the salesman there. From what the sales�an told her, this �ast weekend there was an open house and about 150 people Cane out. Of. those people who had children, they all turned away, as they did not feel the units were appropriate for families. The salesman said that of the units that were up, all were sold but two and he expected to sell them soon. �hen the second phase of construction would start. Most of the people buying these units are single people rather than couples. Ms. Schnabel stated the units were very attractive and appeared to be of good quality. The salesman stated the monthly maintenance fee the first �vear would be $23/month and s28/month the second year. Each unit contained a stove, refrigerator, dishwasher, garbage disposal, washer/dryer/ 30 gal. hot water heater, insulation acceptable in terms of R value, electric heat, with heat efficient fireplace. There was a lot of selection in terms of �arpeting, tile, etc. Ms. Schnabel asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to make any comments about this rezoning request. - Mr. Larry Newhorter, 32 - 62nd Lane, stated he has lived across the street � �from this property for 11 years. He stated when 61st and the stop light �y Stevenson School were put in, the area was filled with concrete. When Park Construction was digging up I-94, they dumped in clay, mud and concrete. He did not know how Mr. DeGardner could build on this property with all the clay and concrete in there. Mr. Newhorter stated this property was zoned R-1 when he moved in 11 years ago, and he did not want any multiples across the street. He was also con- cerned about the height of the units. They would not match with the houses in the area. He stated these units are built for 1-2 people, but he could easily see a couple with a child living there. He would like to see single family homes on the property. In digging footings for a house with a base- ment, they would probably hit sand, but he did not know if they could lay a slab on top of the peat. Mr. Richard Soj, 65 - 61� Way N.E., stated he has lived in his home for 21 years. He stated he has a walkout basement on the east side of his house. His concern was drainage into his yard and basement if this develop- ment went in. He also felt these buildings were too high to have across the street from residentia7. Ms. Schnabel stated any project that is developed is designed to contain water within its own development, so there should not be any drainage onto any other property. � Ms. Betty Rae Berkholz, 6103 East River Road, stated she was concerned about the children. She felt that when there are single people living in a home, they are probably going to have parties. She stated this is a quiet neigh- borhood, and she would feel very uncomfortable because they do not know what kind of element would be moving in. She also felt there would be a considerable amount of turnover of ownership of these units as people get married and move to larger homes. 4C PLAMNIt�G COM��IISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Ed Ksolihowski, 35 - 62nd Way N.E., stated he owns 3� iots here. He stated he was against the project, and would like to,have single family homes on this property. '� Mr. DeGardner stated that whether multi or single family homes are built on this site, there will have to be soil preparation. He felt single family homes were out of the question for the reasons mentioned earlier. With multi, they can get more units per acre; therefore, they can afford to do some soil preparation. As far as drainage, they will work closely with the people and the City to handle the drainage on site. He stated he would be �n'lling to sit down with the neighbors to try to resolve the concerns expressed by the neighbors. Mr. Minton asked how long Mr, Nielson had owned the property and if he had attempted to develop the property before. Mr, Nielson stated he has owned the property for 7 years. He stated he had considered doubles and single family homes, but because of the financial situation, these have not worked out for him. When he met with Mr. DeGardner, they both felt this was the best plan for the property. Mr. Robinson stated if the property was rezoned to Q-3� Mr. DeGardner would be allowed 20% lot coverage. The proposed plan is for 16� lot coverage. He would need a minimum of 35� green space, and the proposed plan calls for 56 o green space. Mr, Robinson stated one concern would be that this proposed plan is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended through the Metropolitan Council. Mr, Oquist asked about a garage requirement. Mr, Robinson stated the code does not require garages for apartment buildings. The City does require 13� stalls per one bedroom unit. Mr. DeGardner stated garages can be provided if people want one, so those options can be built into the p1an. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY l�t. SABA, TO CL0.SE THE PUBLIC HEARIIIG OIV ZOA M84-0? BY ROBERT D. DEGARDiVER. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC BEARING CLOSED RT 9:00 P.M. Ms. Gabel stated she was concerned about the density. Mr. Oquist stated he was also concerned about the density and the type of project this is. He stated a good point was made by one of the neighbors that single people do have a tendency to have parties. It could become a problem area. He stated it was fine to have low to moderate income housing 4D PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 9 1984 PA6E 7 for singles, but the City also needs to be considering low to moderate �income housing for families. This is not a family development, so he did not think the low to moderate income was a positive issue here. NrM. Saba stated he thought traffic was an issue. He really felt this �evelopment did not fit into this neighborhood. He stated the Loft Home �concept was very interesting and it may fit very well somewhere else, but �ot here. ,MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECQNDED BY 1�II2. OQUIST, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL �DENIAL OF REZONING REj1UEST� ZOA N8Q-02, BY RDBERT D. DEGARDNER� TO REZ�NE .FROM R-2 (ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS) Z1� R-3 (GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLINGS) PART OF .LOTS 3 AND ?1, NOT TAKEN FOR STREET PURP0.SES, AND ALL OF LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10, AND LOTS 14, 15, 16, 17, 28, 19 AND 20, BLOCK 20, FRIDLEY PARKj AND PARTS OF LOTS 3 AND ?4� NOT TAKEN FOR STREET PURPOSES, AND ALL OF LOTS a, 5, 6, AND 7 AND 19, 20, 21, 22 AND 23, BLOCK 19, FRIDLEY PARK, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 52-UNZT CONDOMINIUM C01�LEX BETWEEN EAST RIVER ROAD AND ASXTON AVENUE ON 61ST AND 61 1/2 WAY N.E. Ms. Schnabel stated she also thought the concept of this development was excellent, and she commended Mr. DeGardner for bringing it to the City of Fridley; however, she also felt this was the wrong area for this type of development. In the proper location, this type of development made very nice homes for people with certain needs. She stated she was very impressed with the units when she saw them in Coon Rapids. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. �Y84-03, LOFT S , , R: eing a Rep at o� parts of ot an 24, not taken for street purposes and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 29, 20, 21, 22 d 23, Block 19, Fridley Park; and parts of Lot 3 and 21, not taken for stree urposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and Block 20, Fridley Park, to allow the development of a 13 4-unit condomini complex between Ashton Avenue and East River Road on 61st and 61 1/2 Way N.E. ��., MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SEC0111 BY PlR. SABA, TD OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON p.S. N84-03 BY ROBERT D. DEG R. �,\ UPO?J A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE, � RWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 9:05 P.M. Mr. Robinson stated they are basically talkin�bout two parcels of land-- 3.08 acres combined. The proposal is for eight�nit garden Loft Home apartments on the southerly portion and five 4-unit den Loft Home apart- ments on the northerly portion. Mr. Robinson stated Staff's biggest concern was the lot covera � Because it is a difference concept, it does not quite fit into anything t have in the Zoning Code in terms of interpretation. If these were considere - ! ' ,�.�'�.��4 .', _ -..� ;�� '' �, � e 28 �o d �� , �'3� . � _ _ � s 4�Ti� � i Ae %!'r •� r y i � �� = r ry - �' �� i� �� ' � p . '''�� . , . . � �!� �� / 1 �� -- �; 1- r1 . ,�r —� �• . � � ; , � �► rit. � �t�� .� �', � . � i �• • � � � i �s4` �s �s � rs �_ �►. � �r s � , , �� N� � r �� 1 � � • � � - � .� O T I (r / � � � .�. ' � � �. Rt , �` - � '�i I t �, � ; .�ga�o rdn r . � 1 1 ' � l� � i� w�ar � � r a ts � _ p � 3 l� �Y � �`_�/,, : �'•r �'� � ,� � • � � �� , � -�.� �� _ �.�..- . ` j ` _ � oi. � � .�. �?-.. �i . . ' ~ �� .vi► � , '' '' ''i: c� . ;. "" s, • , , . �� I°�:` � �� w � � � ' 1MAY � � ��.►� �o , � L /LI 1/j � t '• f t � .� � � 141 �� ♦J � ;� . � i i , ; � � �:' � a .. � � • '� ' I � � , •� . � � � f MV T S��O' � � � ' '�S f �"' �er �' �� ...� ,. � t �is � : �a A p��t10 *��K _ 62ND w� �. ., — � � ' c, �r M � � �) � 'Q // � > • �»� ��+► ! �� ,.. _' � �: .� f � i '' � -1� �(84.1�j'� * � . � � � � , .�. ` � �� . ,� �.� �. ,� � ;7� i �� i� �a6�'la�� -EO�E- � �— = � � �rc ,z �e, �+ � ; J► ] � � �. � N � r. .. _ � _ , �-- - � r•� �i� si ys 1 � , 'wA� r _.. � � � t � --��a �..� �.{/� � 5111f 6f��+/ " � 4E , „► �� _.. S��l.�� !r �, � /+ � S t ' Ilip � � 11/ / � �. � ��s ' � SYLV _�' �� . �oo� 1� ' 1 « �� i�N �(� � �-TIi11r11C 01 � � ,.__ � r Lt LL � , � ;' ��i2 � w s � � �!� L L% '� � L��a , :�� ,lo � �--�- --•� ��i'� � �%so M � M • � �� * M F.l��IT •A• (OF'FICTAL I�I.I(RT� ABLIC 1�I� 9�e City Council of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing to seoeive ornments regarding requested Cable Television basic service rate inaceases. � �,r � .- � . - .•r � - � - - . . . � �, - - Q1ttPllt Ri94uEStC� QttrElit REQLIIStE� $7.50 $10.00 51.50 S3.00 �e Public Hearing will be held at 7:30 P.M. cn Monday, �un_ at the City Hall in the City o� Fri�ey. Publis�h: May 30 1984 • - 1984 19 84 � 5 STO�� 11781 LEE JACKSON MEMORIAL MIGHWAY. FAIRFAX, VA 22033 (703) 352•1700 COMIMUMCA'l70NS • IIdC. , ;. • May 10, 1984 Mr. Clyde Moravetz City of Fridley 6431 L'niversity Avenue, N.E. Fride�ly, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Moravetz: Please be advised that the financial data provided to the City on March 26, 1984, in conjunction with Storer Communications' rate increase request, and which is a part of the formal application date�i May 4, 1984, is a fair and accurate representation of the finar�cial condition of General Television of Minnesota's Fridley Oper�tions. Should you have any questions on the above referenced finaricial information, please do not hesitate to contact the unde�-signed. Sincerely, STORER CON'.MUNICATIOPIS , INC . CZ��r(�� Frederick S. Rolandi Regional Business Mana�er RR/l;j b SA ��J S�O R LE CammilmeM !o E�rcel/ence tiay 4, 19$4 �-. Mr . Clyde tioravetz City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N�.' Fridley, I�1 55432 Dear Clyde: Please find attached the formal application for rate change as specified in Section 406.4 (1) (E) subdivisions 3 and 4. Listed below are the rec;uired documents and where you can find them in this application: 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4) a) b) c) a� e) f) 9� Balance sheet ....................Attachment Income Statement .................Attachr�ent Funds Stater�ent .................Attachment Sunporting Schedules ............P.ttachment Subscriber Stater�ent ............Attachr.►ent Grantee Rates ...................Attachment Metropolitan Rates ..............Attachment Explanatory Piaterial ............Attachment A A B A A C D B As called for in Section 406.04 (1) (E) sui�divisions 5, 6 and 7, we understand that a public hearing will be scheduled not less than 20 davs nor more than 40 days from the date of receipt of the application. After the Public hearing, either a deterr.►ination will be made within 60 davs by the City or the rates will autor.^.atically becone effective. Please notify me at your earliest convenience when the public hearing will be held. To facilitate your review of and answer anv auestions you might have about the application, I would like to arrange a meeting t:ith you, the City �ttorne� (if you desire), Jim Erickson (our legal counsel) and myself. I will call on Monday to find a time convenient for vou. Sincerely, �! ,,,. j ,�. '� . ,, y � � �'. . i : Chris We�emer District Manager Encl. cc: Fridley City Council cc: Mr. Masim 2ureshi, City Manager STORER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS 350 - 63rd Avenue N.E., Fridiey, Minnes�ta 55432 Phone 571-6206 5C Clyde Moravetz, cont'd. page two cc: Mr. Virgil Herrick, City Attorney cc: Fridlev Cable Commission cc: Mr. James Erickson, Larkin, Hoffman, Dal�r & Lindgren Ltd. � ' ►-� ►roS A�r � � N. A+�•o � H A � O��i � �4 'O 'C F�+� � M�+ � � oA �D 3 f0 f�p �ry r1 � � pb, y ►,�t � O t� '+7 '+�! g � r` C K fD F�• ~ �„r A ? tA !L tt 5 F~�- w rt �K�� 9 ?5 � � r- y �D �• � C� � ►-�. p y 3 K�� A � O r•m � � K a�A � y � � N � � fD �.� !�1 � � � M �Q � �' � R f�p C) � �D � fp M 0► ►-+ v> + r. �'' N W N F"' '�' N !-+ N l7� W �"'i � � O N CO p1 V � N `r w GJ N 'p �"'' � O N O► �„� �' o a� c► � v+ o ... � � � w N � 0 � O N �l W � � � v O � O � d 1�+ 'd � M m f'* r• � � O � K O orbbb� �O KO�pr� �' n O f-' �"t t1r fJ C+ W fD N ff �"f F-' M 03 � ��. �• cn r* � t+n �•� � � fD � O M � � � O W m rr rr A N 'f� l!1 C� .p (v �... � � � 00 �D Q� O 01 A N w �o .i v+ c� � �c 'p �I V� �l O F-+ .ca .LS N W 1D �! � lr� M-+ V" '� N tJ1 �J t!1 h-� .p ATTACHPIENT A � fp ��a� tAf9 N� �t � W G � M'• A f� �+ � O � m � i-i � C � � � N � o► w �"' i-r A � �J �D N N N o p� k, N N W O� � V1 �D N N i-r �"'� Q1 A W N �! �,a 0 V� tJt O � �N y � � y O 0 � F�• h r0 �. � fp �s � .o �,,,i . � v � V F�-� � �J �n a . . a� w W O W �! tT1 .�a . . a� v � O te1 � N n �o rt o0 � w 1--� I; � � A rr o0 � O � � t � R � �-1 � F-+ � F-• � n f7 CO � ? i1 A� N � � 5D ( � f � C � '7 M ► w r. tZ F �- r � � V. O F- 't7 O o � f.�i q Pf h7 r• � � � r• � G� � C (; � G 3 '� G O n � '�G ►�• N F1 � A . � \ N � \ � �o. � yNA OZA H o �K �rtM :� k' M � �'f '+7 f�D 2 ? A � r• a O �3 � o�� rt Z �a� �o'� t7n O�'�C O' O� N 1D cn � o� w e* H rr tyn ~.0<� ~ �m ty c or r• ?, a n � w a�o � �e A N rt w 0° r► w � m � M .o c w � � , � � N N P,1 F.. �O N �1 �J N N U1 O� Q� A W�D W .� O� A W fr OD O N O� 00 v�D N w ... < �D 0 � � �:i e.� r n� N r a . � rt o o c� n� o v, ,�, �• v+ rv cn w a+ a� w � �'� OD ln �J N N�.1 ... � � � N N N F-+ � ^ � � . rt o v� � r� o�, ,s F''• Q1 N O� W C� A�D W � �D Q� O 6►� �D N N{Jt v b z n Ch � � n H bOHO ►t R I7 < �D. S rr fD � fD fD M ��n�D X [s7 uf !L � �X R G. o�x � � � � 1 y Z� � � N A f.+ O h-� V� pp C.1 tl1 �7 h�-� � a N � �-+ O Op �J V1 W Q� v b fD K pr K 5 � M � n � fD N F-+ w .r �� fMD A„r � �N� �� 7 � , �. . � � � m N N GD tp .� W Q1 �N pD N 0 0 0 ... n � P! C� � W F-r v' I�, E r• f�+ � �",' '� .� . � rt c� � wmo «t ?� W O � O� ;� rt � � y� �+ g � � r• �o ^ F�+ n f'f Ca • K ? �+ a�voo a �e�iw W �'� �� Llt O IA O N � �"' � SE c� � � � K c� � H fD 1•� �7 F� z �r � A r• < t�j � N m C � ''< O� tn ►-b3 � �► � � a � �� K� �n v� a y, 'v z o � F' F�'• N H � n ATTACH11EVT B STAT£MENT OF SOURCES APJD APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS All funding for capital investment and operatinq..losses is provided by the parent company, Storer Comriunica'tions, Inc. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATE�tEN':'S The capital structure of the subsidiary is based upon initial caF�italization from the parent company and any advances to or fror� the parent company. For pro forma purposes, the actual capital structure of the parent compariy has been imputed to the subsidiary and is the basis of the interest expense calculation. For pro forma purposes, an interest rate of 12$ has been assume�. Pla:nt property and equipment are depreciated on a straight line bas.is in accordance with the following schedule: plant and CAT�J systems - 12 years; converters - 7 years; vehicles and other bro�idcast equipment - 5 years; furniture and fixtures - 3 years; bui:lding and building improvements - 33 years. Over.head is allocated to the subsidiary from regional, division and corporate levels. All overhead is allocated eaually using a pro rata revenue approach. � State and federal taxes are calculated for the subsidiaryo un a stand alone basis. The flow throuqh method is used for invest- ment tax credits. ' 5F .• Fi-idley Bloomington St. Louis Park St. Cloud Northwest STOP,ER CABLE RATES: ALL MINP7ESOTA SYSTE?�S BASIC RATE Current: Proposed: $7.50 $10.00 $8.00 $10.00 $�•95 S10.00 $7.95 $9.95 $8.45 p�A ATTACNI�NT C �: 5 �7 ADDITIO:VIIL OUTLET PATE Current: Proposed: 51.50/$5.00 $3.00 52.00 S3.00 $3.00 53.00 $1.50 52.00 S3. 15 r;�A 9 0 PRICE CObiPARISONS OPERATING SYSTEN!S IN METROPOLITAN AREA SYSTEM - Fridley (Proposed)* Bloomington (Proposed)* St.Louis Park (Proposed)* Minneapolis Southwest Anoka Apple Valley Columbia Heights Northwes�t BASIC RATE $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 510.95 $10.50 $10.95 $10.50 S 7.95** S 8.45�* ATTACHlIEt�T D S H ADD.OUTLET RATE � CABLE STATION S3.00 $3.00 $3.00 •''� S5.95 58.95 $3.95 S2 . 75 53.95*� $3.95** 26 28 27 35 27 28 21 25 33 ........� ................................................................ A�'��GE F2ATE FOR : All Systems All Single Cable Systems All Systems (Excluding proposed Storer rates) All Systems (E�cluding proposed Storer rates and those under rate freeze) BA�IC - $9.92 $9.99 59.88 $10.73 PROPOSED :PRIDLEY RATES ................. $10.00 ADDITION.�L OUTLET S4.28 $4.09 $4.92 55.40 53.00 AveraQe n�.unber of Cable Stations for All Systems = 27.7 Average niunber of Cable Stations for All Single Cable Systems = 26.0 I�uriber of Cable Stations in Fridley = 26.0 .........., ............................................................... NOTES: Th�ese prices were supplied by the Minnesota Cable Communications Bc�ard and exclude sales tax and conyright fees. Because of the many different tiering structures of other cable syster�s, the criteria for deterriinir.g cor�parable prices �+�as �:�hat the �ost would be to receive or have access to the same programming currently available in Fridley. Also we assune that a converter box is provided by the cable company. The number of cable stations was derived from this week's Minneapolis Tribune "TV t�eek" (which excludes local origination/access channels). * Current rates for Fridley, St. Louis Park and Bloor�ington are $7.50, 57.95 and $8.00 respectively, excluding sales tax and copyright fees. ** Franchise rate freeze in effect. t �'�r�v�r��a� �r�J . _ Ce�+a s'at.ors may appear on d!terent cAanne's in eseh bcat ub'e� sys�em. Tn's cha�t isls the statans and vrhat chann�'� they appear on in C+e ma;or bcal ca�le xystems. � � � r d � g � � � ; $ . ,, > � .' _ � J �� 9 � � . I m � N V= � �[ t j ACSN B<2 t9 3-v 2i 35V 27 3a 27 � f.? F�n�nci�l N�tNS S? ' .AP Itsws i•. 30 t9 t5 ' 19 i Ap Soort� � a5 ARTS A32 2t ?3J 37 23J 28 t0 31i33 6_T J►t9 a3 ; ERa:�Ot2FV) � ae6 Sa a6 39 �0 premium Channel G�o» I A6- 9�5 �7 325 � 6 325 25 17 29 C�.ns; �n (CBV� A; B37 35 `2� td '+tR c3 21 C t6 13 i CzS+e rc�ws rCr+w) Fd0 39 �3 ap 27N 3� ?0 M2� 35 i CtiNMaaC!:n� 4e5 ISJ 23J a5 300 3t �33 •�; Ca�',opo Gnema� (MAX) o:s�-r to�si ES?N (ESN) Etatnsl Wor� F�n. News (FNHj G�iaVision � H�O A35 oj� 33 5I M.: !Error: Calliope is a feature of L'SA retwor iPremium Channel �-�Premium Channel �a � 33 �Premium Channel Homs Tneater (MTN) � KA'.SP•TV A E9 9 9 3 19 9 t; (9 19 9 KST?•TY A�35 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 KTCA•TV A%82 2 2 2 2 ? I2 ? 2 KTCI•TV o3 12 � 7 17 7 �7 7 1 A 11 KXU•TV A/o31 et � 3��': •+ ( 3c1': 30 2t lifetire lL1F� A50 <' S=J ! 2C ZiH �8 18 L2� � i� IAusic TV a� 9 53' 2:�c to 2��c I�o , 32 ;,:Z3 3J k:;N ��3 a3 � 29 B S3 f.!ov�e Cha�ne� (TM.C) � - - Nashvi;l� (�:SH) ASt 2� ;�'� ISt 25L 37 '3t !�'�� 32 _ 1:CN fi5d t.1T (At9 1:4 " ' ; N;cke!odeo� (N:K) � 4 020 2� I 23.1 ?o : 23J 30 23 i�v` ' 31 9Tl b38 �o►„ Reuters A°3 3? 50 , c�y I6t5 ( � Sst. Pro;ram (SPY) 625 55 I 3: 32 1-3 Satetl�ta N�twork -Premium Channel Premium Channel Pre�:ium Channel NJT has been temporaril� lost due to satellite change Error: Satellite rews Network is er.tinct ' Showtime (SHO) A<9 ;5 :^� , 20 toC at �fi � 7 a2 s�ectrur�Spons � ' `Premium Channel Tr�-�!r lTdP►) e-9 � �''rl FinanCi�l H�wf tg= . t . liFl Newi� Weith�t { sZ 15� � ` � — U=I Scorts 15' ` � U54 a25 �=.?Sl 25!?0� ,26 I?�IG2: i�� ! � r.CCo-TV a ce ia a � s s a �a a � v, CCO-n aas se f E��:.CO W�atl+er c33 3• 3�? 13� 13 i31 � ' j i'� ='aT•TV �,; �' 13 '?' t 2: �:=., 120 �� I K7= ; 2� • ��:.•,i�TV 1:.�:1 ��i:�� ►: 1�?!•3 1:- \� i�S•Ti ��.>� 7 • � �?7 �^ � 1� � •�,^.ti•TY 1- D1' I . :1 �1'; �;1 _ '1;11 ; � ke�t�er C�a�nal i?_ ! 3�' I I'? I i< � I i= I'e2 i'- + 5 3 28 27 Y7 y5 26 21 26i Total rumber of Cable Stations 5J c�n� �. 765 JW QtDINNJ(� iSTA�ISHII� � �06 FNI"Ti'LED �GBLE (pMMUNIGTION R�TES AND RATE CAANGE PROCEDORES� p�SUAi�TT Zp � CITY OF FR.m.EY GBLE CnMMUNIGTIONS pRANaIISE QRDIrIAI�. ♦� • Y�• �e City of Fridley does ordain that it is in the public interest to set forth the applicable rates for cable oo�rmunications servioe and to prescribe a rate change procedure affording the public reasonable �oci oe ana ar� opp�z t�i t�r to be hear a. 406.01. GF�tAi. P��.S� l. Short Title. �is Ordinance shall be knoWn and may be cited as the 'Fridley CaDle Ca��ications Rate Ordinance.' 2. DefinitiorLS. i�orcis �sed herein shall be defined in accordance vith the provisions of Section 105.03 of the City of Fridley Cable Communications Franchise pr di nance. 3. Requlation of Rates; Effective Dete. �to charge shall be ma8e or imposed by the Grantee for any cable �oam,unications service subject to tequlations by the City, except in accordance vith the pravisions of this Ordinance and the provisions of the City of Fridley Cbble Crnm�ications �anchise Ordinance. '�is Ordinance s1�a11 be in effect, after passage and publication, as cf the 8ate the City of Fridley Cable Communications Fcanchise Ordinance beca,�es effective; and shall renain in effect until anended or superseded in acaoi dance vith the prwisians 6et forth hercin. �. Captions. Section captions or headings sre intenaed solely to facilitate reaain9 and sefer�ce to the pcovisions of this Franchise Ordinance and shall not affect the mear►ing or interpLetation of any provisicn. S. Severability. If ar��► sectfon, subsectian, eentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Rate Ordinance is, for any reason, held invalid or ��itutional by an ccurt or a3ninistrstive agenc.y of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be dc�ned a separate, distinct and independent provision an8 such lalding shall r�ot affect the validity of the rema,ining p�rtions thereof. �06.02 RA►'� P►I�ID O�IIIt Q�GFS 1. Rates and Other �arges. A. Rates and charges charged Dy Grantee for monthly service and fnstallation and other �arges hereunder shall be uniform, fair and reasonable. B. �e initial rate for bnsic servioe 6ha11 not exceed the folla+ing: - •�-��. -] First ZV outlet�ronthly d�arg� -installation Adclitional outlets vith identical servioe, each-m�nthly chat9e -installation s e.00 i25.00 t 1.50 i10.00 C. �e initial rates for preniun servioes shall be as follows: �II 'II . • pL Elf11 tl�1 6EN3 OB/EbCfl Jk3ditional outlets, eadrmontAlY char9e -installation tservioe addition) �10��L t 3.50 i10.00 maxim�sn Servioe in City shall ccnsist of basic service plus one (1I or more preni�n servioes as selected by 6ub�criber. At the present time, the federal government does not allo+� City to tegulate the rates for premiuQn services. In the event that this policy is changed, Grantee'6 prc�►ision of premium tervices shall be subject to City's rate zegulation authority. In any event. no rnte change for any preni�an servioe sha11 be effective u�less Grantee gives at least thirty t30) days advance notice of the increase to all subscribers and Grantar. �l) �e other initial rates sha11 be as follaws: 5K 5l ., ., Reoor,rrect3cn Cflrnertet tental (for a video cassettr seocr�r) Govezr�nent an8 eaucation�l facilities tmonthly basic aervioe only) Senior citiz� disoa�t �available to those 65 0� olaez r+ho are heads of househol�) Lock-vut bcxes (one tin�e on1Y Pu�d'�� :is.00 ;: � Z.SO lio Qerge 25� on Basic servioe i35 .00 (2� Grantee reserves the ri�t to oollect a refundable deposit on an�► and all oonverters. D� ��land addit onal ir�s allation�se�rvi es to subscr ber iat initial �iformly applied reduoed rates. E. Leased acoess c�annels shall be made available on a f irst come, first served bnsis. Grantee shall make available both playback equipm�t and cablecasting technicians needed for the playback of pragr�ns. Rates for 6tudio usage will be c3etermined on a case-bY-case basis and vill be cstablished by oonsic3eting such factors as perosor�nea requirements, hours of studio time required, 6taging, p P equignent requirenents. In any event, leasea acc�ess charu�els shall be made eguitably available to all at �iformly applied rates. F� Servioe tequests for naint�anc,e or re"Pd�r af the SYster" shall be perforn�ed at no c�►ar9e to a subscriber. Giantee reserves the right to assess an appropriate charge for damage to System caused by a subscriber. �e oost of time ana material for repair and ceplacement shall vonstitute appzapziate charges. 406.03 LIISE �c'rDZSI�I• 1. Li,r�e Dctensians. A. Installation charges as set forth in Section �06.02(1) of this Oidinance shall apply in all areas �heLe density is forty (40) homes pei nile or Ri¢xr. 8. Grantee vill extend servicer upon request, to areas where densities are laaez thari forty t�0) homes per mile at the folloKing additional cost per installation: 5 �F1 DerisiLy Per lsile 30-�9 ZO - 29 lldditional Oost p+er Installati� i30.00 • i50.00 C. 1lreas where there are nineteen (19) or less hames per mile vill be served on � oost-sharing basis betti+een t?�e SYsten and the subscribers on a graduated 4asis as follars: �i� Per Mile _.� 15-19 10 - l� 9 or f�wer � � of Cost Cost Paid By Cost Paid By Grantee Subscriber SOt 30� 0� S0� 70� time and naterials D. �ere �+ill be no free installation period in these areas. 406.0�. RATE �i5 1. Rate �ar�ges. A change in any regulatable rate as set forth in Section �06.02t1)t8) and �D), when not inconsist�t with applicable requirements of the FCC, the Board, or other law►ful authority, may be initiated by Grantee. Any such rate change sha11 be subject to apprwal by City in accordance with the prwisions of this section and the follvWing paragraphs: A. No rate change may be made vithout approval of four (4) affirnative votes of the City Co�cil of City. g. No rate change shall be apprwed that would result in different rates or d�arges for servioe to simil arly 6ituated subscribers in the rate territory. C. No rate or charge change will be approved unless all of the st,andaias and prerequisites for review have been met �a �iiea wir� ana detem,inations have bee� made, all pusuant to this section. D. 7�e stan3ard� for revie�►ing a prop�osed rate change will include at Ieast the following, except � the chan9e is required of Grantee by federal or state action or unless further review is not deemed neoessary by City. tl) Zfie ability of Grantee to renaer SystPan servioes and to derive a teasonable profit therefram under the existing rate schedule ar�d proQoseB rate scheclulej �2) A fair rate af seturn on net irnest�nents; 5k t3) A fair tate of return vith respect to investments having similar risks to that o� prwidin9 cable oamumicaticns serviaesf ti) 7l�e �ctent to vAi � a�e in thez�eto� to tbe terms of this FYanchise and the oost 9 �: �S) Capital expenditures m�de by Grante�= (6) Grantee's a�erence to the terms of the Franchise with tespect to oormx�ih► p�c9zar�ning requirenentsf �� ,r� anY pcoceeding, City may consider the extent to which payment or compensation i6 reasorw bly made to parent or an affiliated intertst for any services rendered or ent marde by iervioe furnished. In such psoceedings, any paym Grar�tee to par�t based upon allocations of corporate resources in accordance vith i'CC Fotm 326 sha�l be deemed teasonable. Grantee shall provide FCC Form 326 notWithstanding f ederal require��s• �er P�Y�'�� asl pe justified by Grantee vith an itemized statement. If Grantee fails to justify other p�yments, City �oay disallow' thos� PaY�� in whole or in part �f City finds that said payments did not teasonably relate to the eervice rendered or property furnished by the parent or affil iatef �8) SUch other factors as City may deen relevant. E. Z�e procec#�res to be folla+ea in changing a rate or charge shall include at least the follaain9: �l) An application for a rate change vill be submitted to City and a oopy filed with Banrd. (2) �e apQlication shall De supported by stati stical and other proof indicating that the existing rate or charge is inadequate and t1�at the proposed increases are required to enable the Grantee�t �d order ve a easonable profitlthe efcaca.�der this Franch (3) Zl�e application Bha]1 include. upon request of City. ca�rre�t information and financial information with at least the f ol lowrir�g: �a) Balar�ce aheetf tb) Inc:ane stat.�nent f �c) Stater�nt o� souroes and applications ai f�a�ds: (d) Detailed supporting schedules of expenses• fncome, assets ana othez itens as may be required by C3tyt (e) Statenent o� currv�t and projected subscribers: 50 �f) � cursent list of rates and charges of Grantee applicable to its Systems, or ovned or operate8 by its pnrent ocrporation or other subsidiaries or affiliates of it� pnrent oozperat3onf . �g) l� currv►t list of rates an8 charges %r other systems in the aev� �7) oounty iaetropolitan uea. (�) 'fie application shall include, upon tequest of City, explanato�y material detailing the methais for determining debt and equity portioris of the balance sheet; the b�asis for interest expense; depreciation methocis; the methods for any corporate overhead allxationss and the basis for taxes, including any invesbnent tax creditZ. � �S) City will nctifY the Gstnnot less than tWe�t a t20) Cdaaslnor peiblic hearing on the reque more than forty (�0) days from the date of ieceipt of the application, if the application contains all information tequested pursuant to Section �06.0�(1)(E) subdivisions 3 and 4 abave. Grantee will notify the public through providing notice for one (1) veek, ead� c]ay bet�een 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. an t�►o (2) channels of the day, plaoe and time of the hearings. City will publish notice not less than twenty t20) days prior to hearing in it6 official newspepet. � t6) After closing the public hearing, City vill have sixty (60) days vithin which to make its c3etermination. Any approved change in rates or d�,arges shall beooR�e effective u�on the date the rate change is grarited by City. t7) If City fails to act upon the requested change of rates or chaiges within the sixty (60) day petiod, the requested change of rates or charges sha12 become effective. City may appeal pursuant to the then applicable proced�.ues af the Baard. �F. City nay utilize a rate o�nsultar�t to advise it on proposed rate changes and to assist in maintaining uniform rates Within Lhe rate territory. �e expenses af a rate consultant shall be borne by the Grantee if s �1� �e p�apose8 inczease vould result in a tate thirty pezcer►t (30t) hic�er thar� the median rate for service defined as basic servioe for the seve� t7) oour,ty metropolitan area; and (2) City and Grantee nutually agree upon the rate oonsultant to pe =etained. Consent s�all r�ot be �reasona4ly �ithheld by either PnrtY• In all o�ther events, the expense a� a rate oonsultant shall be borne by CitY• G. nccept as provi3e� be1a+. City s?aall bear all vosts for review of an applicatioci foa� a rate a�arge cfiange. In the e�ent the propo�d tate or char9e change vilx r��t � a rate or d�ar9e thirty percent �30t) e9i r�e s��en (7 county met opolitan area,f all t penses �ervi incurred by Cit]t in re�ie�'in9 and processing the appliantion shall be yorne by Grantee. Tfie oost shall include, but not Oe limited to, attocneys• fees and the reasor� h1e value a� serviae t�s �e�en°ined by City) rendered by City or any of the City's employees, agents or =epresentatives. City shall notifY Grantee of any o�nsultants, other than rate oonsultants, to be employed, the putpose o� sud� anployment ond the anticipated costs. No S�9�� litigation ofcaucontested pnrty fram reco�vering it� expetise sate change proceedin9. �• �i of�ac�lrahtese ore��ers to be�inatde by Grantee. a�bitration the f ixi g Y I. Any time limit �ony be vaived only if City ar�d Grantee aon9ent. pASSID AND I�OPI'ID 8Y � CITY CnUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 6TH L1AY OF DF.`CF?'�IIt, 1962. (�_�� `' - ii'IId.IAM J. t�E - ATIFSZ: �� J�vTr�` SIDI�.Y C:TIl�N - CITY C��RR Public Aearing: Nwenber 15, 1962 First Reading: I�w�nber 22► 198�2 Seoond Reading: Deo�tiber 6, 1982 Publisti: Decdnber 8, 198�2 vyia� 5P 8aptist Academy Pre-K • 12 * Deaf Mmistry * e�5 M�n+stry * Farth Promise M�ssionary Program _ # Dynam�c Youth Program * sa�� Winning Emphasis * Independent Prem�llenn�al Fundamental Separat�st �t� �O !D �C � IE �1� �3A� Ipl� II �1� �C IH �U lR �C �-i 6875 University Ave. N.E./Minneapolis, Minn. 55432 �k Clarks S. Poorman. M.A., D.�., P�sta O�rNc Cl�ypool, B.A., Vouth P�stor June 6, 1984 Mayor Wm. Nee City Hall Fridley, Mirmesota 55432 Dear Mr. Mayor, Phone (612) 571-6409 Rob�rt Chrism�n, M.A., Audemy Adm�mstrstor While the meeting last week here at the church with the neig�bors and you people of the City regarding o� building plan.s was a disappointznent, I c� vnderstand the sitvation you follcs find yourself in. Our building catmittee met last night to consider ance again just what w�e cauld do to make o� plans more palatable to aur nei.ghbors. I think we have cane up with sortne real concessions that will indicate aur willingness to cc�rc�rar�ise. I tepe the neighbors will be willing to do the sa�ne. We really need this building, Mr. Mayor, ar�d I Y�ope that you and the co�Litteenen will discern our time, effort and expense at accorim�dation for the sake the neighbors and the oocmn.mity ar�d will look favorably upan aur vision. May the Lord's will be done. There is a Scripture verse that states, "the king's heart is in the hand of the Lord and He turneth it whitersoever He will". I trust the Sovereign Iprd will speak to the minds and hearts of the City oauncil to respand fawrably to a� request to build an the creek site. Sinc.er y, � �- Clarke S . Poora�l A GROWING LOCAL CHURCH MINISTRY WHERE THE BIBLE, THE BLOO�. AND THE BLESSED HOPE IS FAI7HFULLY PROCLAIMED l: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 ___ PAGE 10 5. 7. BUFFER AREA BE2wEEN R-3 AND DEVELOPI�NT SXOULD BE LARGER. FACT THAT ASHTQN MIGHT XAVE T1D BE WIDENED Z�0 ACCGWIYODA2E ITILY�AL TRAFFIC GENERATED BY A DEVELOPMENT LIJ� THIS. Ms. Schnabel staC he would like either the Planning Commission or one of the member comnissions ossibly Community Oevelopment Commission) take a look at a new definition condominium/apartment development with density figures and come up wi ome recortmendations. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAI AN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated both the rezoning request and th eliminary plat request would go together as a package to the City Counci She suggested the petitioner call the Planning Department to verify the dat en this would go to City Council. aiiow tne con Holiday Hills : REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �84-07, 6Y WOODCREST Per Secti on 205.09, 1, 3, A, of the Fri dl ey Ci ty Coc1e, to truction of a multi-purpose gymnasium type building on Outlot Second Addition� the same being 6875 University Avenue N.E. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY PtR. SABA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARI1dG ON SP �+84-07 BY WODDCRE'ST BAPTIST CXURCN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIIAZRWOMAf7 SCHNABEL DECZARED THE PUBLIC NEARING OPEN AT 9:35 P.M. 6a l, Mr. Robinson stated Woodcrest Baptist Church was located north of Rice Creek, east of University, and south of 69th Ave. The property was surrounded by Columbia Arena on the north, R-1 on the east south and west. He stated the proposed multi-purpose gymnasium building would be located just south of the existing school and church and would be over 11,000 sq. ft. Mr. Robinson stated that in a church area, whenever a church does any development, it requires a special use permit. In trying to fit a church into different zoning areas they use CR-1 zoning, so a 30 ft. setback was required from the neighborhing residential. Otherwise, the church meets all the other setback requirements with the exception of the driveway which should be setback from the right of way 20 feet, but is only 15 feet. Mr. Robinson stated another concern looked at by Staff was the parking. The present lot has 272 stalls. The new addition would require 96 stalls with 8,700 sq. ft. of gathering area and 2,200 sq. ft, in locker and shower area. The existing school, using a 1-250 ratio, requires 67 stalls. The existing church, using a ratio of 1- lOJ stalls (10,800 sq. ft.), requires 108 stalls. The tota] parking stalls required is 271, so there is adequate parking even with the new gymnasium, Mr. Robinsan stated the peLitioner has indicated that the gymnasium would not actually be an additional parking burden to the complex and typically l� � PLANNIt�G COMt•1ISSION MEETING MAY 9 1984 PAGE 11 would not be used at the same time as the church activities. They have indicated the parking lot has never been full to overflowing, and this development would not increase the parking demand. �� Ms. Schnabel asked about the height of the proposed gymnasium. Mr. Dave Radabough stated he was Chairman of the Building Comnittee for Woodcrest Baptist Church. He stated the height of the building from the floor level to where tne roof starts is 21 ft. From that point to the peak is approximately 9 ft. more. He stated it would be approximately the same height as the present auditorium the gymnasium will be parallel to. The back of the school is flat on top and is approx. 21 ft. . Mr. Oquist asked about Rice Creek Watershed Board approval. Mlr. Radabough stated they have gotten approval from the Rice Creek Water- shed Board. Although they did not have to, they considered the existing p�arking lot, as well as the existing building, in their flow into Rice Creek. They designed a flow restriction area as well as a skimming area to t.ake care of anything that would go into the Creek. t�r. Radabough stated the initial building was built in 1964, and the school � �ras added in 1975. At this time, they are proposing the construction of a gymnasium to support the existing school. The reason they desire this addition is because they have to transport the children by bus to other yymnasiums they rent for their Phy. Ed, and other programs. At these gyms, they do not have the use of showers which is important. He stated they make a lot af noise transporting the children back and forth; also there is �he added risk of transporting the children. With the temperature changes from the gymnasiums back to the bus and from the bus into the school, E�specially during the cold winters� they have to consider the health of the r.h i 1 dren . Mr. Radabough stated they will be able to go from the church into the pro- uosed gymnasium so there will be a quiet entry into the gymnasium. By having this facility, it would eliminate bussing, there would be less risk �to the children and to the children's health. Mr. Radabough stated the gymnasium would also be used for recess time. Right now, 2-3 times a day, the children go out on the parking lot. In the winter time, they have recess in a 30 ft. by 60 ft, cafeteria/recess room, and this is not adequate. Mr. Radabough stated they are also proposing an apartment above the locker �room. The apartment would be used to house missionaries or other pastors snd families, on a temporary basis. IMr. Kondrick asked how many students attended Woodcrest School. 6C PLANNI��G COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 12 Mr. Chrisman, Principal of Woodcrest Baptist Academy, 271 - 67th Ave., stated they have approximately l47 students in the school Pre K- 12. ML. Schnabel asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to comment on this proposal. Mrs. Bev Eberhard, 436 Rice Creek Blvd,, stated she was very cortcerned about the large size of the proposed structure, because the only view from the back of their home would be the side of this building. Mr. Dean Eberhard, 436 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he would like to submit to the Planning Comni-sion a petition of approximately 80 signatures of people opposing the construction of a gymnasium at Woodcrest Baptist Church. He stated he would like to address some of the major concerns expressed by the neighbors: 1. The traffic in the area. They are concerned that the gymnasium will increase the traffic due to expanded programs of the school and church. At the present time, traffic is a concern with activities at Columbia Arena, the parks, the athletic fields, and the church. There is no alternate route into their neighb�rhood; there is only one way in and one way out, and this also pertains to the egress and access to the parking lot at Woodcrest Baptist Church. They are particularly concerned about the traffic during the evening hours and the activities that might occur at that time. 2. The safety of the children and the residents in the area. because they do have access to the park at the end of the block. 3. They are concerned about the noise levels because of increased traffic and the noise level of any athletic activities going on at the school. 4. Playground activities. The only playground area the church does have is the park area, and the neighbors are concerned about the requirements on public parks. 5. Future expansion of the church. They are wondering where this expansion will take place in the future as enrollment andior membership in the church increases. It appeared to the residents that the expansion would have to either be by building up.on the existing educational building or acquiring property to the east which is residential. 6. The aesthetics. ?hey feel the structure will give a warehouse-type atmosphere to the neighborhood. It will block out the view they now have and a few hours of sunlight in the afternoon. Will there be heating elements on the roof? Will these be aesthetically detractive to the property? 7. They are co�cerned that the use of the gymnasium will be for other groups. As a result, it will increase traffic flow and activities at the church. � 'J PLANNING COMt�lI5SI0N MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 , PAGE 13 8. Does the apartment dwelling require some special zoning? Mr. Eberhard stated that as a homeowner, he is concerned.about the view they will have from their home. They bought their home in 1968 and purchased the home because of the view they have of Rice Creek. They are concerned about whether this structure wi71 affect the market value of their home if they were to sell. NOTIOI! DY l�i. KONDRICK� SECGINDED BY PlR. PlINTOlN� TD RSCEIVE PETITIGW NO. 6-89. I1PON A VOICE YDTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOI�lAN SCHNABEL DECLAIiED TXE JNOTION CARRIED UNANII�lOUSLY. Mr. DuWayne Bakke, 454 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he was concerned about the traffic, traffic congestion, the warehouse effect of the new structure, and possible future expansion of the church and school. He stated the church has only one entrance and one exit. In the evening hours and sometimes during the day, when activities are getting out, there is an enormous amount of traffic congestion in the parking lot. When activities are going on at the church and Columbia Arena at the same time, the cars really stack up at the intersection. He was also concerned for the safety of the children walking or biking to the park. Mr. Bakke stated the church will be using the last green area they have for this gymnasium, so that means some of the playground area will move up into the Fridley public park. As a property owner, he had a problem with the school using the park as a playground, because when the school children come into the park, the rest of the neighbors move off. He stated he recently received a letter from the church apo]ogizing for them forcing the residents off the park. Mr. Bakke stated there are 147 students at the school. According to informa- tion he was given, 90% of those students are non-Fridley residents. Mr. Jerry Ulvin, 449 Rice Creek Blvd., stated to put the size of this new gymnasium in perspective, it would be very close in size to City Hall. Did the Planning Comrnission feel a warehouse-type building of this size would be appropriate along Rice Creek? Mr. Radabough stated that regarding the concern that the new structure would generate more traffic, they will not be changing the flow of traffic from what is now. Ms. Schnabel asked about the school`s enrollment capacity. Mr. Chrisman stated the capacity was about 200. Ms. Schnabel asked about church membership. GE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 _ PAGE 14 Mr. Radabought stated they have 180-200 members; however� on a Sunday morning they average around 500 and have had some special times when the attendance is up to 900. They would never use the church and hold��thletic events at the same time. Ms. Margaret Maeckelbergh, 425 Rice Creek Blvd.. asked if a stage would be included in this new gymnasium. Mr. Radabough stated they are putting in a platform for a stage. They have one big play a year. Mr. Chrisman stated that 39 out of the 147 students are residents of Fridley. Eight of the 11 faculty members are residents of Fridley. so that equals more than 10� who are residents of the City. Mr. Chrisman stated that in all the activities he has been involved in in the four years he has been at Woodcrest and in the State of Minnesota, he has never attended a Christian school sporting event or dramatic event that drew in excess of what the church normally draws on a Sunday. Ms. Pat Johanson� 424 Rice Creek Blvd., stated their back yard.backs up to the church's property. They have seen as many as a dozen buses from all over, and that is without a gymnasium. With a gymnasium, she did not know what it would be like when they have competitive sports. She was concerned about what type of air conditioning or heating units would go on the roof. Right now there is an unsightly green metal unit on the roof. Mr. Chrisman stated the church has ten bus routes on Sunday morning to pick up children in the community for Sunday School. But, that is something that is going on right now without the gymnasium. There will be oo activity taking place in the gymnasium that will equal what they are already doing now on Sunday or any other night of the week. Mr. Radabough stated he did not know about a green metal roof unit. but he would be happy to talk to the neighbors and do something to make it look better. He stated they will not have any air conditioning units on the outside at all. It will strictly be a ventilation system for cooling. Mr. Quentin Freeburg, 301 Rice Creek Terrace, stated they live across the Creek from the church. They have lived in their home for approYimately ten years. Their view of the current structures, as well as the proposed structure, is from their living room and dining room windows. He stated it appears the church has made an effort to try to get materials that blend in with the existing structures as well as the habitat. He stated they have no objection to the new gymnasium. He stated he would like to read a letter from a neighbor who could not be at the meeting. The letter was from Dr. David Zeigler, 315 Rice Creek Terrace, which stated they did not feel the proposed gymnasium would affect them and were not opposed to the building. GF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 15 Mr. Freeburg stated they have been members of Woodcrest Baptist Church for 9 years and have two children who attend the school. One of the things that drew them to the church were the activities and thmt the activities were not upsetting to the comnunity. They would like to see the proposed gymnasium built as a supportive function to the school. Ms. Sharon Gustafson, 437 Rice Creek Blvd., stated she would like to address the aesthetics. She Nas sure the Planning Commission was aware of parts of the City that have not been planned very well. She stated this area is highly visible from Highway 47, and she felt the proposed gymnasium would be very detrimental to the look of the neighborhood a�d to the cortmunity itself. Mr. Roger Reed, 290 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he was directly across from the existing building and the proposed construction. He has lived in this location for seven years. He felt the church has maintained its building well. He felt the church was an asset to the community, and he did not feel it detracted from his property in any way. He stated he is a member of Woodcrest Baptist Church and chose to live in this location to be near the church. He felt the gymnasium was really needed for the children. Mr. George Lunde, 545 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he and his family are new- comers to Fridley. They are also members of Woodcrest Baptist Church. They joined the church about one yPar ago. They were living in White Bear Lake and decided to move into Fridley to locate relatively near the church. They decided on their home because it is a very nice neighborhood and is secluded. It is near University Ave., and he felt the church property formed a very good buffer between the residential area and University Ave. Ile stated he felt the value of property is really determined by the buyers coming in. If he was moving in again and the gymnasium was already there, he would still have moved into the neighborhood. Ms. Lana Freeburg, 301 Rice Creek Terrace, stated that in reference to the comments about the people being aesthetically affected by the building, she did not understand how the neighbors could present a petition with 80 signatures when 80 homes are not even close to the property. She could understand the concern by some people regarding the traffic. but she would hate that to be the only excuse when there is already a significant amount of traffic from, not only the church and school, but Columbia Arena, the park, and the new ballfields. The traffic lights could be timed so the traffic can move through a little more quickly. She stated they have small children, and they do use the facilities at the park. The reason the church uses the park facilities is because they do not have facilities on their property. If the gymnasium was built, they would have their activities in their own building. Mr. G. DeShaw, 530 Rice Creek Blvd., stated this is one of the most unique neighborhoods in Fridley. It has the lowest crime rate in Fridley. It is buffered by Locke Park, Rice Cree, and University Ave. There is only one way in and one way out.. They are concerned about everything that happens in their neighborhood. He stated the people have an honest concern about their property values, because this is a warehouse-type building going in. 6G PLANNING COMMISSIOf� MEETING� MAY 9, 1984 ___ PAGE 16 Pastor Clark Poorman stated he has been the pastor at Woodcrest for 14 years. The school was established in 1973. With rare exc�ption, he felt the young people have proven themselves well disciplined and ther� have been few incidents. When the educational wing was built in 1973. being new to the church and not knowing all the details, they did not check with the neighbors. They tried to make a number of concessions to try to maintain a good rapport with the neighbors. They want to continue that good rapport. They want to do something about the unsightly rooftop unit that was mentioned by one of the neighbors, but there isn't much that can be done to dress up a gymnasium- type building. He stated he appreciated the concerns of the neighbors. If he were a property owner on that street, he would also be concerned. He stated he hoped the Planning Commission realized the church was willing to do every- thing they can to be amiable to their neighbors and hopefully this will not mean ceasing to put up something they desperately need. Ms. Schnabel stated she felt there was a real need for communication between the church and the neighbors. She would encourage the two groups to get together and discuss this proposal. !►lOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO CL0.SE THE PUBLZC NEARING ON SP #184-07 BY WOODCREST BAPTIST CNURCH. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT I1:I2 P.M. Mr. Saba stated that in looking at the needs, benefits, and detriments, he felt the need for a gymansium took precedent. He did not think there would be any traffic problems because of the new structure. He sympathized with tlie aesthetic concerns, but this is a CR-1 zone and a lot can go in a CR-1 zone. Mr. Svanda stated he did not necessarily agree that the traffic was not an issue--perhaps with regard to safety. He did not like the warehouse-barn effect, He would not like to have a building like this 30 ft. from his home, and he was not in favor of the proposal. Ms. Gabel stated it seemed traffic was an issue in terms of health, safety, and welfare of the people, but aesthetics was not and had nothing to do in terms of the burden of proof. Mr, Kondrick stated he agreed that aesthetics was not a good enough reason to deny this special use permit. He did not think traffic was an issue because he did not feel the traffic would be any different than it is now. He would prefer to have the children in the gymnasium than in the parking lot. Mr. Oquist stated he also because of the gymnasium. Ms. Gabel had brought up Corrmission could deny the have been brought up. did not think there would be an increase in traffic He sympathized because of the aesthetics, but good point, and he was not so sure the Planning special use permit because of the reasons that 5H PLANNING COMMISSIOty MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 _ PAGE 17 Mr. Minton stated he agreed that the traffic was not a big issue. He felt that if the congregation has a need for a gymnasium which they have obviously demonstrated, the Planning Commission should tqake every accomo- dation they can to allow for that. There were two issues he would like clarified before he could vote on this: (1) The aesthetics. He felt that �was a real issue that possibly could be worked out with the neighbors and the church. He felt there were a number of possibilities there. (2) The temporary living quarters. Is there any special Zoning for that? Ms. Schnabel stated she was sharing some of the same feelings in terms of traffic. She did not see that as an added detriment. She thought the biggest traffic problems were being generated by the church activities, services, special events, etc. She was concerned about the aesthetics and was not comfortable with the design of the addition. She asked about the feasibility of sinking the building a few feet into the ground. Mr. Wayne Tower, Suburban Engineering, stated that to sink the structure into the ground was nearly impossible because of the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer. In order for the showers and the toilet facilities to function in that building, he did not believe they could push that building down to any degree to make any reasonable effect on the site. ' Ms. Schnabel stated she did th�nk there were sor�e other options that needed to be explored. She did not see a cohesive plan that sl�ows exactly what is being done, and no landscaping plan has been proposed. Both representatives from Woodcrest Baptist Cfiurch and the neighbors stated they would be willing to get together and discuss this before it goes to Gity Council. The neighbors stated they had been totally unaware of this proposal until about 8-10 days ago when they received the public hearing notice. MOTIA'V BY MR. OQUIST, SEGt�NDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOHMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROV�IL OF REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP N84-07, BY WDODCREST BAPTIST CHURCH, PER SECTION 205.09.1, 3, A, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PIULTI-PURPOSE GY1�4Q11.�IUM TYPE BUILDING QN DUTLOT 1� fIOLIDAY XILLS SECOND ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 6875 UNdVERSITY AVENUE N.E.� WITH THE COINCERNS EXPRESSED BY TNE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND WITH THE RECAMMENDATION THAT THE NEIGHBORS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF WOODCREST BAPTIST CHURCH GET T10GETHER FOR DISCUSSIDNS BEFORE TNIS REpUEST GOES TO THE CITY GIDUNCIL AND WITH TiIE STIPUZATION TXAT THERE BE AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. Ms. Scfinabel suggested the petitioner contact the Planning Dept, to verify the date when this would go to City Council. � . - . � � 61� SP #84-07 Woodcrest Baptist Church 36 . _• . � I � i .+` .. ��, - - �"... �!Y T i� c • , �f � _T�. �:_r� • . , . 69 TH N.E. �.. . - �.. ...' � �e M . . ��G � . n .. ,�. ..r �., �'E :� , N �li � �' S 1 '•L' / ~ �� .� �� "� •.w .�• 1 1 �• ' ;�:�►' • � � �100 Q �Ot �571 S'70 �''� --� * '�,to �[� � � . , � ., •�r► ' 2 �=!0 ' . ; ', � o-�` > I13 5�� ; � ' � ; S�C N � - ,� , ._ ...« � ?+106 m � 2 0 2 A � � = � �j 1 1 �S ,i w E � . . • :�1 ?�� 1 i � �,3 12 SS1 � '� Ssp� Q . � � � � • �- 2l 1 � ! . � /. �' < . w { ��' •r'"�� . " -* ; 5 _ . �. • !� 20 •"''r � ""' � � ` �6 W R � a ; S�s s t � .�� \' � � • Y• � �• W � „ , a �/ r � s: � ' ��s-� � ' �!: . 4 r � � �.. �. v►�� "r '�(i � � � � ;,,r �•� ( ; �za c� : � 9�s a � • � . +`. qp, . . . . 1/ ;ti � .� • � t � ( i � ' � .� •• '�" 5 ~ a .� , z . '. e� � • � �� • • �"1 ,: �: r y� •S'QQ � f � ' . . 12 '�y�'' / l � � «. , ; • , ��,�� ' ' 3/ � t* • `• `. . 2 � � �6 ({,/ •, 3 �•�� j� . �, O �� ;, �0 � �. N!�. i`'', � � .. � . � � .y. 4�3 t ; . . ��•'"+� � i . . �� f ••�.. I � � `A�� W •� ,n•• `�`% � -?'�� •t . � 1 `, � f.. � �� i MI� i�� 4 y ,A ~ � � ��e� �� ' � � " �� ' • , , � �� • O � � � A, ' � . _ ; � ► ► i '`, ' � '�„ y 9 � : d. , , t't r"'�` � � � ' � � . � • � . �� :. \ ;� - � � � - e� • � .�; t � ,s . � � � +'_ \ _ ,1r'I� a �� , ��. . ! .� ,,,C► „!'"'f � ; o` ; � ` =;: �o � �*% � 9 .: � � � ; \� S2S��, •; � ,� ` •s. .or.... ''� •�Spp 9 � l �� '� 15� ' � V ; , e� "1. , .. �!n •. i . 's -. •� • . �. 4 , :,.; �.j'� 1` � • 5 � !�' �, " �' �il � 2 � � 1 � �-dQ �{ ,� � � 8 .� � r,, , , � �. ,.� . � � - - . � � '~ ,� • , ' 28 � ' � � �' � 30/ . • •. . .. , �' , yt• •�-.-� yrY �• s� , _ �1 ` ' ,L �- " te^ t '�' �"" '�r �w M~'•� � • /� , � I � ` .�. .�VO Tt� �•�f• ; �•� � .� •.�� ,• ,«, „ � � ,. ; `, � j ..,: :,} 3�s � •�_ �3� � ;� ,;�"480 ,� �- �9't'- �' •7' �w7'� s� � ,~ � �� 'r ti� 4li� � e }�r�. ,` '/I ,M•b • � ' / 47 ,� � � . �^ 9 ,� . !�/'a'r • y ! . . ' � ,. Q � :''�' � :`�• :. `' �' ss `'�. . v�� 3 �.. � � /Z � : �t� . ` �,,. 't1° 9� � ' � • 3f2� `� �` �'•- '` .�+'� � � i -� ;� . , 9 � ° , � =�� . �' 8 „� � � �r.,, �.g0 • N�p ' • I .�.� ; ,1 _ � �` '%•. r 4'� ; � �iZl� � btoo .."�i► i � � .. . . . �Y�- _ � . -:> ' � ,,`"'{ ._ -� ��-�� !� •� t � �y`O 'S ,�: �� 12 �1 ,� � � � 2 36� ` � . -r'! , 4b5 170 �. � ; � .. � • �� ,, 9 �O i3.' ��;w �M i 1_ � 7 i0 ��t �� i� '�` %� �' � • • r � • • `�� h. , S t `� u ' � fIt /�.,� .� ijy ' i� i • 'y• � a� N� � • � • , ' � ` � IO ` , � � ,, ,• � .. W z 45 � ,5� (; �� • 's � 6�,�� Z � = gg9 0 � { L • � J� � ��! � WM ''' • �• ; ` q0��'+ qzs ',%�� o � • 5 419 � �C 6 • � • ` �� S �. � ' j (,7�20 t�i� �7.� � Z y6- � ''` j �A �; � s"• �, � � � 6-. ,. o ; � ��ti �, � !Y i w ` f,� �T �s,. • . , • . • � �.,r" � .,, Z � 6 7�G, _ •G 7�� • �'�4 � �. , � � . .y�; :: .. , � , �,,, _ � T,; 2 ` � • ; �. Z.. ��• � s B 5 4 .� '�' • �9a � � 351 �t S � � ~ �145 , �ib � �T i A 81 � • P �C,• •b� �—� 1 e � �� 4�5 � �o , � e � , : o: � 6, . 7 391 �/ 41 „o . �� ';�- , � . � _` �f • � a � /vr I�� .� �w _�• 2 � • 67 AVE. N.E. ,� . .s �.., .. . . � �i ss �J +J /� • `;,'L~� ��L � � • � �60 37O 380��39 � ,� ��j��y�� ySD�yZO y�o ya4 ► �' n:1� .t SP #84-07 Woodcrest Baptist � �_1�__,_ +� , � �—,,_... _.._, _ � '� - � �. hui�ch � � . � \ __ �9TM_AVE_ _, � ._ -- — � � ��y . �.�, z. •. � ' ,,� . . � , � � � \ � � . � � 1 C ♦ ' � `� � �II � : 1 s M� � � ! � _ ► �. �` ! C � �I I y \ .(� ` M � ( �' ` t � � . < = i � �• _. \ !��. � > � � ,1 ;` "�� < < I I �- . � • � _ � � - .� � . � � Z I �" ,. � `, y � - �`. O � I �� ' � �� ♦ � � '� �' �� % . .i � 1 r ' ° ' �\ � . � �� . ,' )� � ! I °� � � �� g ��- , � • �"� � I y °; ��. � r i � M �i � 6 � f `.'� \ �l�` s� y ' � � M ^ A � ' I � � �I � `' R: / � � r �^ � �'� � r � . � • '•. . , •, , ti � , , : -_ � � ' 'I � � �� `�' N 1 ' � / I � 'i . � I � � � / � �' 1 F'+' � � i � J /\ � � { �:' � � :,� w � -' � � l � 'b i �� _ R _ �� `. � _ • c r . ' I � I � — r-- \---' ' ��/ •�c i � 1 c• .=�'`� � �\ \ `` / -�'� _ _ • � i ;�. � - � \_^ / I � e'�:� �.lr--.._ �--. � �� I � �� ,r• �; _-�� 4 I , -� �,- , i � � '11� � ! � N' „L., � � Y }� � � � ' I V^ : � � � . :�, _ � _ �� M � I_ ' -y` i�— : � b� i� • �- �. \ \ ` ` u ' . '"�--.. � ' o r/ � I I 1 a 1, �?� •' ••` �` �� : � � � d�_ ,, ,—t1 � J ` .+cwscn � .�� ,^� �-�--�a: � \ I •� �, i ; ; ._ =1 .= .` , . .I � .}_ �� . � ' I �.�� .` a - � i ; ( i �� , � � �~�`� `` �� ' —��__ ' - � i , � �. . • � � - -_ . - . `�. • - .� I ',//-\, \ • \ `:_ z -�``_ \ ` ' • - � /�r �' \�' � :i � I � ' ! � �`` ``` w _` `` ,• ; ! � �� y-��,}� R�-� : ; `� ,^''- � ;, � , , � " , ! ' i '; ��_- . \�; ` ��: � � + . I`� ��. �� • ; . `` �`: �..r t � � � \• C'q� � � ,. - �\ }= � ;� F �' �� . ; , , .� F,�.�. -. � , � �� \ , x, � � � ,\ ` �. ` K� ► .\ a �, 6J �� , . .. - � i � I _� �� n+ _ � y� � -- - -- i IY � ` I �� /�� ' __— ! _ i 1� � �) � —1> f,� � _ �t -�{ � ,-�, _' ` I � �t� %� � , . , � , �, . I i,'` , ' • _ i � ` . � ' ` ' �- � , , •, , , a , \ I` ,1 � ' i � s ' � _� � � _ •• . � � � , � � � � � . � ' , , � , � , _ �__ � ``" 1 ! —.� . 1 ; � � � � � , , � f _. � '� 1 � t �z t I i i i I � �� ;�L� ` ��: . Ai? � '�, �`-. *� > �' . ?�' .__ ., s � : ; ,�� h . ,. ' 4�' i11A% , �. �'�� ..'� � ,� k �t . �.� . v _.._.� . ._ � � .s�► 4.. .." .•� .. �y�, _ . ��. � � � '.. � , . . , • . � �� i' �+��y,y 'A� , f � `3. �.,si #, S. l� ..:��3.`ci 4 c � � � ,. � .. y�} �n�t Y ) � ,� ��a; �. .:J � y.:�: , -'�,� - � .T �.t��'4�� ,L Y-x � R "3��_ ' f .f� .yr.� 4 "� _b� * �l�i�s}, �� r"� �� ' { � ' . �'t. � ! .� ,;.:.a ::�; ti 3�' � y �+s� - \ : � .',F - ..i" ' S,• � ,M1 �,i r ". �,a'�!r . !^��5,'._ i;.., � ��r t` � .� �' 'h. :��+� �� - . ,,, .... i' ` _ � .� t�� -� , � .., w ' . _': 3�=:,i�F�e p� " ' � �� — 1 '! ,�" 'It , - . ��. � . � . ., � . ... � . .. - �; �, t . ;� ' if. f`t' � r '. ._. }., +� . .�,--�- . �. "`� - ' <, . :� � � , � �� .' . ' : ,' .. s �� . . -y�• '�J.(;�,; . � �i h ....' . ..i X `Y � .. . �� '�► �. �b ` ,� Ra .6. }.a,t' x ;r4 � �t �!, - .,,se, � � v�� .ci - . �.,,,,,M .�E� �'� � �' �I � � �, . �,, � 4 •y r > t . �* �_ _ S . � • . � ' ,� '�.;- � , r � r� .� � �}:' � - �� r4�..�" +`�C�'l1!�6%--,.. :..��y.. 'i ' Y ��,, J;. � Y � a 1Qy-� ` i �� _ % - ,� � y�• .f x �♦. '.7��'� d�"' �� - - �'R'. •V'��.�: f� •- � � ! �. . r .� .. .. . � �F"�" 'y� • �a ' 7G.• { : .t' ..,.��, , ^q / � .�.L. :l ; .S ,Y►.R �, � 7 �jc j � �• i�.. � 6 ► � i. . �t�'y. �. .F�.�l� . � �• t- •f^ } .,:� .� � '� : ,� ��.t. �� _�`��4� .k ij L .G�.. ' � ',�, S� ♦ � . �_ . y � y � ' � >f. T Y. �� . � � � ' 32 � '..:�`� � �..' �� • ♦� > ,� ��t� � - �d j � ��' � • ,' - t� �:+�r .� a r ..�t ' ' ` •� • r . � e` ��. . i - - i _: � , 1 ,� . `� J. � .��.) . .': . p X ' �;' . . • 'r . � rY'.� � SL� il. 1 — . , .. � :Y'": � i fi"� ,� � • .� 3. ! �� ' . � • j - .3 '� ! y .♦ i �+ 't}� {1 t_b..4� t � t ✓ f ,�{ � -� � ; , i. � .9. � ,� �� e � ' � .. _ � i � � �j t � s.. �_ . .. .� �, � � � :t �'�T j�• ..�Y.. � � y: � � t ,' T� a �� / �' � ' _ �� ` :� r �.. � � .,y � _ f' � i .' • � � � �: �, f � ,' �� .�. j � �� f t �� `�3� ` f ,�Y . �/is ,� x ..� ..- � �1��- ;- � • '# • c� . ��+. � � �` � - t � � �'- ",i � ' � � , � � r.x �� . ! 3 � F �v.. � F�� ia - �. ` ,� � #"� �"';!!'' , ij � � ,� r �'; 'i,� _ .. � � - < _ ", .�:� "� '� �� _ � PR p,SE'� : � �: � � � • ,,, : � ._ � f�� . . ,�. ' d � i - `� x.�%-;� i ¢ � ;� _ � �`� ,x: DL +�,i��= � � r v •� �� ` f +� �� •-� �# � � . - •` { �' � ia a . , . ,�� ,�° �-� ., � � . � � " � �`�,1 .::�, � t _ , . ¢ � . .t . . � �_r �y„� �� #� � � .k"�. � ' " i`. s •� � «�i•t f � , •',` � � f � � �,� _� � � � � : �` `� �1 �!' Y ,,� `�` `: -r '� '' ` . `�',�i,�i� j i - . . : � , {r '• y' � .i .� '� - i j �! � .� �r� .�`S �.,. ' �tJ. `,: �� y :.�^ '- � ,r� /� ..� � . J ` � l.' -� �'., •� /` � . , a ' , .�� .. . �� . .. . . .w � . �.: rh � � -. T 1 . � 2 '. ,+ ��, ` O � � r � f ��[ ` �� t. � . j � �;�. � �,. > �:.i � � s i : �`r, . : x ' � . ;z � ,:� �� .� .'� �� ie ; i � i' ' V ' _��iY � • T . . � ~� � . �' -. � �" � � '` ��`� � � �� :� ' , . `' �l ' /�' , y, ;� s' _ ., •..' .. _ � ��-._ �.. ci�T:y . � ?. - t 3� � : '�r, e , �: \ � � � ; ,. � �-�� 3,� r �.-.' �`- ..�� s , , � , w� _ i' � �� . . ' 1r : � • !� . ;6 . T _� f'� ♦_ � . 3. _ � . i� y ; � :>f r _. , . _. _ T . • � .�.� • �. •_ . � - - _ � . �� -- ,. . . . „- .. ., � _.. aa . - � . ♦ � . . . � � . , � .` -t . � . - � . . �_ : , �� _ � rY ' i � , - � , r `� _ t y � � � . , .._ . �.a . . � �ea�- � ' � � �. _ � � ��` ` �.�` � -'�A � : `' s '� � ..sr_ � ' .' e�.ij. �� `f� f� �� F �... _� '��, ,`F� _:� � �1�- -�t � , `�� .f' :� � � s�- �..- � � _ � �. � 3 - R_ .._ �� . .: � .'� � -. . • � - - �. �"r� � : ri v. � ��.-.�-� f � - : " �<-� � � -. :- J � � �* . ; �. �d'�, �� J.�.��4++e��`..wrs-f. � �� .: � ' �" ,=� •• `�f � , - G.� �""_ �t ` "d. . .. �� Y-F=.--L ��' + "^ MAILING LIST Woodcrest Baptist Church 6875 University Avenue N.E. SP �$4- 07 David Radabough Woodcre�st Baptist Church 6875 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & M�rs. C.J. Johnson 400 Ri c<� Cree k 61 vd N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Marcel Pattock 401 RicE� Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley„ Mn 55432 Mr. & Mr�s. Donald Vant 406 Ri ce� Creek B1 vd. N. E. Fridley„ Mn 55432 JoAnne 1'homas 412 Ri ce Creek B1 vd. N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mr�s. Gary Anderson 413 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Scott Lund 418 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Firs. Charles Johanson 424 Ri ce Creek B1 vd. N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & �1rs. G. R. Maeckelbergh 4�5 Ri ce Cree k Bl vd. N. E. �z.,+tl.��✓ %iv�, � S6'•/3 3r Eric 0 �unlogson 430 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Phil�ip Eberhard 436 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Gustafson 437 Ri ce Creek Bl vd. N. E. Fridley, hh 55432 Planning Commission 4/24/84 ____ 6 L City Council Notice Sent 5/22/84 Re: Special Use Permit - Woodcrest Baptist Church Addn. ��. Mr. & Mrs. Myrle Rice 442 Ri ce Creek Bl vd. N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. b h1rs. John Haines 448 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Ulvin 449 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. DuWayne Bakke 454 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fri dl ey, �tn 55�t32 Mr. & Mrs. Arden Foss 461 Rice Creek Blvd. N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. C. J. Mickelson 4� 3 Rice Creek Slvd. N.E. .�..a,,r� , r.-.. . s'�+ 9 -� Mr. Joe Garthofner 485 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Quentin Freeberg 301 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 MAILING LIST Mr. & Mrs. Robert Peterson 480 Rice Creek Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Ms. Jeanne H. Petrangelo 520 Rice Creek Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. James L. Becker 571 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Wm. Manson 570 Rice Creek Slvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Dean Eberhard 436 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. �& Mrs. Laurence 6. Anderson 220 �ice Creek Blvd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. � Mrs. Loren Hedman 261 Rice Creek Blvd. NE Frid'ley, MN 55432 Ms . .ludy Cooke 224-Ei9th Place NE Fridley, MN 55432 Ms. (;laire Kultgen 456 Rice Creek Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Ms. B�arbara 6. Jensen 550 R',ice Creek Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Special Use Permit -. 6 M Woodcrest Baptist Church SP #84-07 City Cour�cil Notice Sent 5/22/84 �: Dr. David W. Ziegler 315 Ri c:e Creek Terrace Fridle,�, MN 55432 PETITION SIGNEES Notice of Public Hearing 6 N MaILING LIST at City Council 6/4/84 Mailed 5/22/84 letter received Mr. b Mrs. Roger Nelson 490-69t��h Ave NE Fridle�v, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald J. Dibos 500 Ri c:e Creek B1 vd . NE fridlea, MN 55432 Mrs. A., L. Sarnett 574 Ric;e Creek Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Jane 6<irnette 574 Ric:e Creek Blvd. Fridle,�, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Gerald DeShaw 530 Ri c:e Creek B1 vd . Fridle�, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Earl Johnson 540 Ric:e Creek Blvd. Fridle�r, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Vye 560 Ri c:e Creek 61 vd . Fridle,�, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Chris Hansen 230 Ri c;e Creek B1 vd . Fridle�i, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. David 0. 470 Ric:e Creek Blvd. Fridle�r, MN 55432 Janelyn Stanton 521 Ri�:e Creek Blvd. Fridle�v, MN 55432 William D. Boatman 531 Ric:e Creek 61vd. Fridle,�, MN 55432 Special Use Permit #84-07 Woodcrest Baptist Church Addn .- Mr. & Mrs. P. Lubratt 580-69th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Joe Hughes 295 Rice Creek 81vd. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Walter Traczyk, Jr. 191-69th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Anthony Krall 194-69th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Bruce Reveling 181-59th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Peter Schweppe 260-69th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ernest M. Harper 257-69th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. E. J. Stephens 149-69th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Harris Mr. & Mrs. J. Garthofner 485 Rice Creek Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. J. Widmark 511 Rice Creek Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Len Berg 252-69th Place NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. William R. Manson Mr. & Mrs. J. Krichen 570 Ri��e Creek Blvd. 238-69th Place Fridle�, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 7 CITY OF fRIDLEY PLANNIf�G CONIMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: .. Chairwoman Schnabel called the June 6, 1984, Planning Comnission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Memb�rs Present: Ms. Schnabel, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Minton, Mr. Saba Memb�rs Absent: Mr. Oquist. Mr. Nielson Others Present: Jim Robinson, P]anning Specialist John Flora, Public Works Director Mary Erickson, 650 Ely St. N.E. Ron Miller, 953 Mississippi St, N.E. John Dunphy, 155 Stonybrook Way N.E. John Hitchcock, 9516 Tyler St. N.E. APPR(1VAL OF MAY 23, ]984, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTIC�N BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO APPROVE TXE MAY 23, 1984, PLANA7NG CDINMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRk�OMAN SCNNABEL DECZ.ARED THE JNOTION CA12R1�ED UNANIlNOUSLY. 1. F'UBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #�84-10 BY Y ERICKSON: Per Section 05. .,D, o ri ey ity o e. to a ow t: e construction of a detached garage, 24 ft, by 32 ft., in CRP-2 zoning (flood fringe), on Lots 34, 35. 36, Block V, Riverview Heights� the same E�eing 650 Ely Street N.E. 1y10TION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TD OPEN THE PUBLIC NEARING C►N SP MB4-20 BY MARY ERICXSOIV. L'�PO�N A Vt�ICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE 1�IOTION CARRIED UNANIJHOUSLY. Mlr. Robinson stated the property is located on the south side of Ely Street in t.he Riverview Neights area. The petitioner is proposing to build an accessory building (a garage) in the rear yard. The foundation is in at the present t.ime. The setbacks are adequate and do meet code. The special use permit is required because this accessory building will be in the fiood fringe. �taff would recommend the following stipulations if this request is approved: 1. Need to waterproof to required elevation of 825.25 ft. This may consist of two additional courses of block or the use of water resistant wood. 7A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1984 ___ PAGE 2 2. Structure should be securely anchored with anchor bolts. 3. Oriveway to garage should be paved with concrete or asphalt material. '� 4. Garage to be completed by Sept. 1, 1984. 5. Petitioner will eliminate the continuing outdoor storage and curbside parking problems. Mr. Minton asked why the stipulation that the garage be completed by Sept. 1, 1984. Mr. Robinson stated Staff felt that because of the nature of the problem they are trying to correct here, the garage sho�ld be completed im�oediately. Staff felt a date of Sept. 1 was ample time for completion by the petitioner. Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioner, Mary Erickson, if she had any comnents to make. Ms. Erickson stated she was concerned about cost, and she was assuming the two additional caurses of block would be sufficient. She stated they do intend to have the garage built irtmediately, so she did not see the need for a completion date of Sept. 1, 1984 as a stipulation of the special use permit. She stated there was no problem with paving the driveway as almost all of it was concreted at this time. Ms. Schnabel stated that regarding the outside storage and parking problems that currently exist, would this garage eliminate those problems? Ms. Erickson stated the garage would be used for storage and this would eliminate the problems. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECLWD,ED BY 1►!R. MINTON� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP 1i84-10 BY MARY ERICKSGIN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CIASED AT 7:46 P.M. Mr. Saba stated he had no problem with this request as long as the stipulations were met. Ms. Gabel stated she thought this construction was an excellent idea, and it may be a way of solving a problem that has been going on for a long time. She felt the stipulation of Sept. 1 for the completion of the garage was a necessary stipulation. 1�JOTION BY MR. MZNTQN� SECQNDED BY l�t. KONDRICK, TO RECO!►fMEND 410 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP M84-10� BY !�lARY ERICKSON� PER SECTIQN ?05.24.4,D, OF FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCI"ION OF A DE'TACXED GARAGE, 24 FT. BY 32 I'T. , IN CRP-2 ZONING (FIAOD FRZNGE) ��i LOTS 3'q, 35, 36, 9LOCK V, RIVERVIEW XEIGHTS, THE SA!►� BEING 650 ELY STREET N.E., W7TH TXE FOLLOWING STIPULATId1TS: 7B PLANNIN� COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 6 1984 PAGE 3 1. ?. 3. 4. 5. 1VEED TO h►ATERPROOF TO REQUIRED ELEVATIGIN OF 8?5.�5 !'T. THIS 1�lAY GbNSIST OF TWD ADDITIONAL COURSES OF BLOCIC QR TBE USE OF WATER RESISTANT WOOD. , STRUCTURE SHOULD BE SECURELY JWCXORED WITX ANCNOR BOLTS. DRIVEWAY R1� GARAGE BE PAVED WITH CONCRETE OR ASPHALT MATERIAL. GARAGE BE CO!►�LETED BY SEPT. 1, 1984 PETITIONER WILL ELI!lINATE TXE CONTINUZNG OUTDOOR STORAGE AND CURBSIDE PARKING PROBLEI�LS. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRWONAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION ' IED iINANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on June 18. 2. 7ABLED: LOT SPLIT RE UEST L.S. #84-05 BY JOHN HITCHCOCK: Split off the .out erly 84 feet of Lot 8 H, Secon Revise Au itor s Su division No. 21, to make a new building site at 953 Mississippi Street N.E. (Other lot will be changed to 6530 Oakley Drive N.E. N:OTION BY MR. KGWDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO REMOVE LS N84-OS FROM TNE TABLE. �UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTI01'1 i�ARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IMr. Robinson stated they still need the owner's signature on the lot split request, and the owner, Ron Miller, was in the audience. Mr. Robinson stated the property in question was located on Mississippi St. west of Oakley Drive. It was a corner lot. Previous7y, the northerly 81 ft. had been split off, and at this time the petitioner was asking that the southerly 84 ft. be split off. This lot is presently built on and the house faces Mississippi St. Mr. Robinson stated one of the problems expressed by the ►^lanning Comnission at their last meeting was the variance situation. He stated three variances are scheduled to go to the Appeals Commission on June 12. The lot split will create a new front yard for the existing house. Presently, in the front .yard there is an accessory garage building that would need a variance. Another variance would be that the front yard be 25 ft. versus 35 ft., and a variance that the rear ya rd be 21 ft. Nersus 27 ft. Mr. Robinson stated the proposed house on the new lot would front Oakley Dr. Mississippi St. then became the side yard, and 17.5 ft. would be the required setback. However, Staff was suggested that 30 ft. be provided. The adjacent house has a front yard setback from Mississippi of 110 ft. There are similar setbacks as they proceed westward to Jackson St. After Jackson St., the houses are closer to Mississippi. He stated the side of the proposed house would be on Mississippi and would not be consistent with the neighborhood. He stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations if the lot split request is approved: �c PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1984 _ PAGE 4 1. Approval of variances created by lot split (scheduled for Appeals Carmission on June 12) » 2. Existing structure (now facing Mississippi) have new address on Oakley Dr. after lot split 3. Signed park fee agreement for one lot of $750 4. L^t split to be registered with County pri`or to issua�ce of a building permit. October 15, 1984 is deadline to split 1985 taxes. 5. Existing garage (accessory building in front yard) to be relocated to side yard if it is to be replaced or substantially improved (at 50% of garage replacernEnt cost) 6. Owner to sign lot split and variance requests Ms. Gabel stated she felt this was all inconsistent with the neighborhood. She could not remember any instance where a variance was granted so a garage could be put in front of a house. She stated the garage in front of the existing house was the biggest problem she had with this lot split, and she w�as not sure what could be done to alleviate that problem. t�r. Kondrick stated the house and garage are already there, and that will n�ot change. The people who build the new house are going to see the same _ t.hing. He stated he did not have.a problem with this request since the situa- t:ion is an existing situation. t�r. Saba stated he agreed with Mr. Kondrick, but he could also understand Ms. Gabel's point of view.of what this was doing to the neighborhood in �eneral. All of a sudden they are allowing a garage to be in a front yard, and the City would be setting a precedent. Ms. Gabel stated she also felt they put some burden of proof back on the (:ity if they grant this kind of a lot split, because this lot split does require variances, and this was not a variance she had ever seen before. It was not the kind of variance Lhat comes because of the "lay of the 7and". Mr. Kondrick stated he would agree if they were talking about new construction. He stated he would consider the new proposed house more of a visual problem �han the problem of the garage in front of the existing house. Ms. Gabel stated she thought the intitial problem started with the garage in front of the existing house, but then it was compounded by putting a new house on the corner of Mississippi and Oakley Dr. when the setbacks are as far back as they are in that area. Ms. Schnabel stated Ms. Gabel had a valid point in that the variances would �not be necessary if the Planning Ca�mission does not grant the lot split �request. The City, in effect, is creating the variances that become necessary to be appealed. The variances are not something the petitioner is creating, but the City is creating them if it approves the lot split. Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioner or the owner of the property if they had any comuents to make. 1D PLAN�ING COMMISSION MEETItiG, JUNE 6, 1984 PAGE 5 �r, Hitchcock stated he could see a probiem if they were proposing to con- struct an auxiliary buil�ing in the front yard--somethin� the neighborhood �ould be upset about. Ne was not sure what Ms. Gabel wa� objecting to. Ms. Gabel stated she was clearly concerned about the garage in the front yard. She felt it was inconsistent with the Ca��prehens�ive Plan and the total �lanning for the City. The visual impact is that people cannot see the house f'rom the street, only tfie garage. She stated her other concern was that the �lanning Comnission's granting of the lot split was what was creating the variances. If the Planning Commission does not grant the lot split, there is n�o need far the variances. What is the position of the Appeals Comnission in denying the vari3nces when the City has granted the lot split? She stated she was very uncomfortable about granting the front yard variance for a garage in the front yard. Mr. Hitchcock asked if Ms. Gabel would be more willing to look at this if he moved the garage to the side of the house. Ms. Gabel stated. yes, she would be more willing to take a look at this if t:he garage was moved to the side of the house. Mr. Hitchcock stated he was not convinced that moving the garage was going t;o improve the looks of the property, but he would do whatever was necessary. Mr. Robinson stated that if the garage was moved, there would be quite a �ifference between the proposed house and the existing house. The petitioner might want to consider moving the proposed house back 5 ft. to make it more c:onsistent with the existing house and the new house to the north on Oakley. Ms. Schnabel stated she was very reluctant to grant the lot split. She h�onestly had a hard time visualizing a house going in on the corner of Mississippi and Oakley in front of all the rest of the homes in that two block �rea. She felt it would dramatically change the nature of the street. It �as really inconsistent with the neighborhood. Mr. Hitchcock stated that considering the fact that they are in conformance with the homes on Oakley Dr., could the Planning Cortmission impose something that was stranger than the code? Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Cort�nission can only make recortnnendations to the City Council. Then all the legalities have to be handled by the City Council who has legal counsel. The Planning Cortmission does not have that legal counsel. The Planning Comnission can only go by what the Zoning Code says which does not give them legal expertise. Mr. Hitchcock stated that because of the demand for land being what it is, he believed that at some future time it was likely that this same kind of �ot split would be proposed for the other side of the street on Oakley. �f Fridley wants new construction, it is going to have to work with these xypes of things. 7E PLANr�Ir�G COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1984 __ PAGE 6 Ms. Schnabel stated they did not know what was going to happen in the future. 5he agreed land was not easy to come by, but she still fe�t the Planning Conmission had an obligation to preserve the neighborhoods. Mr. Kondrick stated that because of the trees on the lot, he did not find this as objectionable as he would if it was up about two blocks. He stated he did feel this was the best use for the prcperty as opposed to having nothing there. He would be in favor of the lot split, even though it was going to create some problems for the Appeals Comnission. However, he would t►e in favor of a stipulation that the garage be moved to the side of the existing house. - Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Mr. Kondrick. He stated this is a very unique area, and there is not a lot of conformance in that whole area. His main Goncern was the garage in front of the existing house. He would be in favor nf the lot split with the stipulation that the garage be moved to the side nf the existing house. Ms. Gabel stated they will be creating a"monster" if this lot split is granted and it ther� goes on to the Appeals Comnission. MOTIDN BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO REC0171yEND TO CITY CDUNCIL APPkOVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. M84-O5, BY JONN HIiCHCOCIC, TO SPLIT OFF T.�IE SDUTHERLY 84 FT. OF LOT B X� SECOND REVISED AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISIQN NO. 2I, TO MAKE A NEW BUILDING SITE AT 953 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. (OTNER LOT WILL BE CXANGED � 6530 OAi!LEY DRIVE N.E.) � WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIDNS: 1. APPROVAL OF VARIANCES CREATED BY LOT SPLIT 2. EXISTING STRUCTURE (NOW FP_CING MISSISSIPPI ST.) TO HAVE NEW ADDRESS ON OAKLEY AFTER LOT SPLIT 3. SIGNED PARK FEE AGREEI�NT FOR ONE NEW LOT �F S750 4. LOT SPLIT T10 BE REGISTERED WITN THE COUNTY PRTOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILD- P,SRMIT, OCTOBER 15, 1984 IS DEADLINE TO SPLIT 1985 TAXES. 5. EXISTING GARAGE TO BE MOVED FROM PRESE:IT LOCATIDN TO A LOCATION SDUTH OF THE PRESENT BOUSE ?XAT IS CONTI�UOUS WITH THE ZONING ORD717ANCE. 6. NEW HOUSE QN THE NEW IAT 3b BE SET BACK AN ADDITIGINAL 5 FT. TQ 40 £T. (AS OPP0.SED TD 35 FT.) FROM OAICLEY DR., BASED UPON WHERE THE EXISTING 'GARAGE IS RELOCATED. i7PON A VOICE VOTE� KONDRICK, SABA, AND MINTON, VOTING AYE, SCHNABEL AND GABEL VOTING NAY� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Schnabel stated the variances would go to the Appeals Comnission on June 12. The lot split request and the variances would then go to the City Council in one package on July 12. 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #84-07, BY BRANDON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: Split ot , loc , ity iew, in a an ad one a f to ot 4 and one half to Lot 6, to make two residential sites, the same being 411 ana 415 57th Place N.E. 7F PLAN�ING COMa1I5SI0N MEETING. JUNE 6. 1984 PAGE 7 Mr. Robinson stated there are three existing lots on 57th Place, tocated �ust east of TH �47. The petitioner is requesting that the �+iddle lot, Lot 5, be split in two, and that 20 feet be tiven to each of thg adjoining lots to �nake two 60 ft. residential lots. The lots are each 40 feet by 140 ft. Total square footage of the three lots right now was 16,860. yielding two lots each at 8,430 sq. ft. Since this plat was recorded in 1887, the Code states that 50 foot widths or greater and 7,500 sq. ft. or greater, are allowed, so even thou9h the proposed lots would not be up to today's code, they are acceptable because the are was platted prior to Oecember. 1955. Mr. Robinson stated there are several 60 ft. lots in the area, so this wauld be in scale with the neighborhood and rvould meet all setback requirements. Mr.Robinson stated Staff would recomnend the following stipulations: 1. Signed park fee agreement for one lot of 5750 2. Houses to face 57th Place (as others on double frontage block) 3. Lot split to be reg istered ith the Count orior to issuance of a build�n9 pernit. October 1�, 1984 is dea�ling to s�lit 1985 taxes. Mr. 3ohn Dunphy stated he was representing Brandon Construction. He stated he believed this was a very simple lot split. If everything goes well. the builder would like to start construction the first half of July. He stated he felt these new homes would really improve that neighborhood. 1�l��T'ION BY J�iR. XONDRICK� SECONDED BY ?!R. SABA, TD RECOMI�ND Z1D CITY CDUNCIL AiPPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST� L.S. N84-07, BY BRANDON CANSTRUCTION COJ�ANY, � SPLIT LOT 5� BLOCK Q� CI1'Y VIEW� IN XALF AND ADD ONE XALF TD LOT I AND AIVE' HALF � LOT 6� � MAKE ZWO RESZDENTIAL SITES, TNE SAl� BEING 421 AND 415 57TX PLACE N.E. , b►ITA THE ibl.LOiIING STIPUI�TIOIVS: 1. SIGNED PARK FEE JIGREEMENT FOR OrNE LOT OF 5750 ?. liOUSES TO FACE 57TH PLACE 3. LOT SPLIT TO BE REGISTERED WITH COUNTY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDINC PERMIT. OCTOBER 15, 2984 IS DEADLING TO SPLZT 1985 TAXES. UPON A YQICE VOTE, 1lLL VOTIXG AYE, CNAIRWDlHAN SCfJNABEL DECLARED TXE !�lOTION CARRIED UNANIPIOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this request would go to City Council on June 18. 4. RECEIVE MAY 10, 1984� NOUSING b REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MCY!'70N BY PlR. SABA� SEGbNDED BY 1�2. KANDRICK, TO RECEIYE Tf1E XAY 10, 2984, • iIU(JSING i REDEVELQPAlENT 11UTHORITY MZNITl'ES. UPON A votcE w�, �LL VOTING �1'E� CIiAIRWOMAN SCffiVABEL DECIJIRED THE MOTIC�N GIIRRIED UNANIIYOUSLY. 7G PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1984 PAGE 8 5. RECEIVE MAY 14, 1984, PARKS b RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: w J�TIDN BY XR. RQNDRICK, SECONDED BY 1�1R. I�IINTQN� Tb RECEIVE TAE XAY Id� 1984, PARKS & RECREATION CODI1�lISSIQN NIINUTES. Ms. Gabel stated that in reading the Parks & Recreation Conmission minutes, she was quite concerned about the possibility that the beach house at Moore Lake would be torn down and not be reconstructed and the possibility that the beach would not be guarded. She stated the beach is really used, and there are realty too many people using the beach and the lake to not have a lafeguard. Mr. Kondrick stated there were alot of auestions about the use of the beach, the lake, and the beach fiouse. He stated'ihat at this time, this is all just discussion and nothing has been decided. UF'ON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE, CKAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTIDN CAIRRIED UNANIINOUSLY. 6. RE'CEIVE MAY 15, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: J�lC�TION BY l�2. JNINTON, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE TXE lNAY 15� 1984� ENVIRONI�NTAL QUALITY COMMISSION 1�lINUTES. UPON A YOICE VZ7TE, ALL �JOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE MAY 22, 1984, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY PlR. SABA, SECONDED BY 1�II2. KONDRICK, TO RECEZVE TXE MAY 22, I984, EN.ERGY COMINISSZON 17INUTES. UP��N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRW0IN.�N SCHNABEL DECLARED TFlE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE MAY 29, 1984 L APPEALS COMMISSIOt� MINUTES: 1�lO:TION BY 1�LS. GA.BEL� SEC�VDED BY 1�lR. AlINTYrW, TO RECEIVE TXE 1NAY 29 � 1989, APPEALS COM1�iISSIQN 17INUTES. UPc7�V A YOICE VOTE, ALL VO?SNG AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECI�ARED THE AlOTION CARRIED UNANIPlOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: J�IOTIDN BY MR. RONDRICR, SECOsIBDED BY 1KR. 17INT�ON, TO ADJOURN TNE XEETING. iIPON A VOICE I70TE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECLARED THE JUNE 6� 1984, PLANNING COMMISSIGIN 1�ETING AA70URNED AT 9:30 P.M. Respec�fully su itted, i � z -��c � Lyn Saba, Recording Secretary 7H iiARY ERICKSON S.U.P. �-10 •, �) iiEm TO WATERPROOF TO REaJ I RED ELEVAT 1�I S�y.2S. TH1 S MAY CONS I ST OF T1�10 ADD 1 T I ONAL OOI�tSES OF BLOCK OR TFE USE OF 1*1TER RES 1 STANT W�. Z) STRUCTI�tE Sf�UI.D HE SEU�2ELY ANCHORm NITH ANCF�R BOLTS. 3) GARA�GE MI LL BE Cd'pLFTID BY SEPTE!"�ER 1� 1�. y) I�t I VEI+IAY TO GARAI'�E SHA�L � PAVED Ml TH C�ICRETE �t ASPFWLT MATER I AL Dl� I NG TH 1 S OOf�tS1RUCT 1�l � S) PETITIOf�FFtS MIIl ELIMINATE TFE CONTINUING OUIDOOFt STOR�f'E AAD Cl�2BSIDE PAR K I NG P4�08L.BiS . � � L�' wn --' ;2-.�-- � ` 5 SP #84-10 Erickson 650 Ely St. N.E. WAYNE !� R1DG� t�a s�yo� 1625 Second Avenue � e�oxe. a�u�c.�v�s�� 3 L o rs 34 3� 3 c; c3 � v c 1. •�/ . , , 2��t=1Z\/l E�/ Nr'�G}.�TS sr 0 1�� .1 -- z � � � �� 1 1 Q �" 1 1 4� �iu v SC'. L�d ? 5' z 5= 7s �o ja � h � � ` 3� �� .; �� /'' = zo � 7I ` ��e�1a��a 1/� f�cx-`�c�. . �e�,�looc� E��'- `bo�'� .Z`i Gu,�-�� 1� � �.� � �Z ,�, -�o P o� ��5} �ZZ.9� � �1�— . N� �d��'nl �• Z`1' -�c 2 C�� cc,�� 1.3L ,��:`.. :•r C:::'•`! i,`,:.! i:i:5 Ss:�!�':1: j��I, G• ". . . !" _�. : u/ i•'!3 Gi 46:..' i .TO;� (�.-,:;i - ': . , :'� '� . _ , , . . • _...� � ':i i c:.. .l .. �. . _.. . •v . . . - _. . _ . . ' ' :.": ��... ; t�.i .... ... ... . � --_...._ ..__`_- =.1_ _� _ � _ _C~�..-_ -' --� :�t:,._�/��Z/V _- __�.. 11':p. :i0. � � f'!, z --'-� SP #84-10 Erickson 7J 650 Ely Street N.E. �� l �.�� '�- . _ � , �. � c. . rr�� , , . �4� _` ,_ • `, 1 , �E� �lir .� .�4 � � �r � � ' -----+*- � S � �- , s�� " " !_ ��O ' • � � � � n� N . �� • '� `�td „r« t ►r,r''i r f• �, '` . • � \ p� � ' �i t ' � � i... - ��t�� . 1 �;f ' �,1't , �'F'r- r'� � � �, �'s ~ '� � � j F�1 .��'� • 4? ,t,,,,,��=;�,p � fi3 EE �, � � , :�s ,, � . t o eN � ,� � �� . , - � � ✓ , a t,� - t ` s � � � �� ,.� . �t �t j � � ` I , `� '' � � � , tt � � � r � • t s � i Y'� ♦ OO ''� �' � '�M �. �j Ii . � � !r r I� s • �1�, _ ^� �+ f� � • � ~4 ► • u�` � - � ' �� .� . »' f � 4'� r t . 3� » �, � r N � j \ _ . ; 'r �.' � - � . L �� l �. , • 9 � � 1 . � t� F � . 1O 1� H , >� M� : � �" � r � � � � . j � ., -t � . . '�1 #�� t � • �t�'�'� � z' � � � � .�.-�` � � ��J� M �L ,t A '��,y�, .. ' �" � fl � � �� Z.r�, ; ' � • �/ * � � `' � C _„� 'w ''• r t _ �j„ ,; �, � � � = j i . v , - 's � = � I�M�� .a� A / � � � � i t t ,t �;,j:! -.� N �� _ � ,. � sv� � � fi, j�! � � s "!� � � � . !D ' 1 ` ! Li.�� L r�'� � � �. �' f� ��' � � � \ � � 7� I/ - �.�10 r � s.4`�� _ / ,_ � �► t lyf+ i l2 • , f• � • L � f1. � `_ •! � � 'C` 'O • /! • i � t'' - � �` r s `' .—s '.. � � . � j� N � � -- i . ` � S � � . 7K .�� :�; :, �.� , !_,.��:t _� � (.AT $PLIT �I-{�% ti �.► l,i S 1(7VED PARK FEE K�EOrE'NT Pa2 ONE NEW UOrT � FEE TO BE s%SO � 2:I f�ous�s �o F� 57TM P�.�c.�. (As om�s oni nou�E �a�rrasE �ocK) �(�T SPLIT TO � I�GI STERm MITH Ca1NTY IN A T1t�LY MIANVER � � orY'�. � � � . J�� '✓� . �� a�� 5 . . �� 7L _.., . - . . ,. � � - ; : recor i thls off � .... s e �L �. �.:� a a � � � � . � ;� ` � ; t the 28t� ' � Nove�nbcr A � �► �� .l3. 18 ... ��!'�y�� ' ;,, A[ 87 at �o-ct_ % M d '.a . . `:�a. .� .�*t�r r: �j 0 �Ri fat$ .ff �. . �•..• � .. _ ��. '��/ F�, �._ � �r ..`3 a:_ 'i�; - � j% (7 � . .� . �►•>.1 n/ � .. : - �„y,�F �» ... . . -..:' : .� ' ��/� : ,l/� + /""�'V�. � �� 4 R�9.� of Deeds fo sald �., yt,.�:�. - - � ,� : : Co�u�t . , " • �+". > S MJA � . � � y ' . � ,. �......_. � ''�. . . � I � ..� �i.�. .�- f� � �'�_�.i�? .>" . � � . ' ` ~ ,�. ' . -:�''' __' •�-..�„ `�L.S. #84-07, Brandon ConsLruction . � 23: , � � ' ." �- .� ..4 - . �';;: � ; .' .� �3 .. . ':' � j' *4 r - t + , � '! ' - " . . -. - . :. . _ �. , ._ � �/ . ! � `_ . .. ' . ",��,-..r �� '' . n . . � " �L �`� =1-- -�'": . .. _ . • r .��"_ "y:- - � t � . �.� � - ' � � � ��_:� .+t; t�y�_-. . f � ' � �t� �. � � .. � j ! . � •1 - � D �r`� Y . }�. � � ; �- . . �`�'�.�� '- .�t, � �.y :+- � � .' � �' i 3�,?' '1t? -- . :.� , �. . � � . 'vPL� �� - '�". � . s �. .�._. � . � � = -.. . ,,:,_ . • _ .._�� , � - .�. T--� -r-- � _ _... -5'1;/Z �4VE ` " t�tE . ' � �--► '° . r,� _ �*` *'� �n -T1SVVr�i-�e-�.-Y-�:...._.. r .. ; i ' �� , 1 , , �.: I � �� C. , r� �+ k ., � � , �.� 3� ; � i � � I � \ � � � ;� ` � � ' � �' f -1 '—' -L *'__J._�%� •r , �� ,�,� e ,� !b �'N'T�;.�' � i j . -1 �� ,. � ��;e�►�� ti��. N a- _ w� Ai �e �, �_-- � �� M, � � �� t �i�i; �:�; l; ' ---�. bo � �-„ �_ / j � , �* L�� i I r � � � � �7 t�, . ` f ��'L.?�� .. - . � �- •� � ,� -r « r� ,,o . � 3 , � . _� . ' � � 3 � �O � �' . }[--T-.tn �,_""r - T — , � � r � � r � w—� ��T }� *c M }�' k i' M � ( � ' , � ' 1 � , � ' � �/' ' �� ' � � � �, 1 ' i . ti � j • .. ` ,a� �' �f �! ? �� i 8 �� 7 � � � Q e � � � � r �. ..i ,� ' ._ � � � $ � �� ► � i �, ,r Q, ' ` '~ �' � 't _ '•. �; ' � , : r, . ; �• ( �. .J� wl. 1' # . � . _.� • J .. . �� •►. �' �'" � 1.._+� �,� ��* � } ` �♦ \ � ' ` . �. - : .. �� ._.�___ :_ � : . �` °` 'rr' *_' �' ,a - � ,-,r--- - - ._ _ _ , _ . , a .,, :. , , _ s .v . -� _. . _, _ .. _:.. . , . • _ . . . , - ' , - -. � tl�e sor�th ttive�:ty-Flve ( 25) a �` - � E �� _ --__ ' ln to►•�r� ' i T cres of E li+e :� t . . sn p h1rt y(30) of Range ' of A �� o i,a a n� S tatN oF Mlnnesota, ai�d .. '�� . � �ar,ying ln;tru��ent of de�dicatlon, as _ ��' j -• ' a true and correct piat of fF�e same; � _ - . � " - - - � - ` - . h�mdred feet to the in h• : � - ,, � C � ,. ', Y4 , .: ' �ll_r �1 of a. foot� and that i: fia►ve flxed a stoc�e � '� JCA►..E . ..� ,� � oc k ` � - Qe�mbered One q) ftom whtch to p �`y: `_ r, ; � �` . [' � �� s _ .� ^•' P 4 F .%'� � ' ,� _ �_' a . r�� - � � ._; � t � d i. t � . iw'{'. . � �• �',t ♦ �- w�y s . � , : � ' � .. . . . 'r ''.. r� �� » � L �` �' � � _xY' �t� y , ; '#�. �� y ,ys 9� ��,"i. 1 �y, .u�C �y�fi R �. z Y K . � . .. 6 � F � i . . . , . � � � S k � f�, ., -` � � � _. i �.: _ 'Y.-,l r � F _ 'u+ , �Kr3 t ... t �Yr � L ' p��` Y` � t i 2 . � .y,tyS;�� .r ,F : - 7X-�� . . � y � �. i �;fi+i4�,} r c. �}� � #�•!` � r,�.� �.-I s. '_. j ? r � y:' .�+' � �� ' C�. .. ` � ra.7�' �,.?� y ? � y � � � i <' -. L" t : �'� +�5�' '� �-i �'� .- +r � ..; ,Y s,� v'� �v t +'M.. 9 � . f a�S� 3i"" .r � +� � ; � i a '� � : � T .-I .e - h ��r -`_ � a' 1 f , f _ x r � t � t �,� r - yi[ - �c ..�t . . . � -.� +i, br^- � �}i: `�7F� h.�q a i .. +` �j �." •�- � �� '1.; i _ 1 ,�y r�� y� s�y! � +1r' "`'�•�s��+�.'� `C� �� r~.e-t�g { � !� �.-�� "'S t��i,�r*�, � 'b- �c. �. t�j• � R ✓ �. � F �rE p � 4. ' SijF� " �X � � � A. !�(-M. i�7 � �� °it. �l .Y 9 i � Ss.� �"' � S „� � :'i. . �` ,y�, �.�i : r � ! { 4,�:'� '=�,,,i'rrd ak ��"�y,��r� # �,fl� ~ : 3.r�� :�� r:�.,��E��`.�::,K2i �..a'''.:i��-F-:49Gaf �� ts.�b `� A�`� �s_�.i.��). sc e � .=;.:,a.� }� t , �1f .. '1i�' : � r`�: .w'� i. � _ f �� L • 'L":,t •; " r . � .... . ^��,.. • � ` � . ' ' � �� K . �f _ `..f�T � � . " , �. .., .. .. : �w . "a . ,�� ''� �� y�{� �� }, � �. �F s _ . . � i1'.{;.�'� . n "� i� ;,' � r ti, ��, .� ,'r. ' - � � t� �� { � [.4 -.,� .� -�... `�'< . .. !?=xs#� n ... ---- - . � . �, . ' . i'� +i v_ • . �..�� y'`-.` �y� _'�� " . =. ! TN L.S. #84-07 Brandon Constr. 1`�1 _ A � / S�� , e � ' r t '�� ` ' /�i � S �� S S � . - � �u'_ �� S � � �2 ! '�� P _ _ _ ' i�tY ♦ � �1 �� s�� s � � , s � I ,, � � , �s x " � e � �ib x� �° �� e �' I Z +; � ; �� 3 i � ••�r , _!Lt� *. � � y'�° � a�°� , .4 _ j F .,,s� `� �o �• — - 3s .� � •e �_: ,� � w�� H E's.a�swr� w ♦ r� :, 57� Av E. . . . . „ „ - '� ; ` ' . o : .�; . � � �. AD 1/ /Z �3 �i � /'f / �` �/ 2 .3 4 S o 7 ' ,d // �' � � �j �. � 2 I �'s,' �'I�%� i 4 � � �'; �. � '`. 5 9 � ..av � !,.,_ . ,�.Nz,,�7�t PLACE » »- - � ��';� . 3 . " . � f ` ' � ,r 1 ,• � Z � , A 9 .�/ f ':,� S a'.° g � Z 3� S 7 "� L/Z ,! �I � � 4� q� � e o 2 3 3 0 �1 0�, ' �� "1" � � * ' —_`NiI ,_�_ _ •— -.—• _'� =� '_ ----- s'� �i--AVEN�-- N.E. ��,,.��-- � si� � f � r� r-------� r""'_lr"_—� �-----� . � � ` - • /' _ _ __ ___ 3 � � _:�. . . . __ . � ._ . . s - _ . . . . �:�� - . . �� .t� � CITY OF FRIDLEY CATV ADVISORY CONMISSION MEETING, MAY 17, 1984 4CAll TO ORDER: �.. � Chairperson Hughes called the May 17. 1984. CATV Advisory Conmission meeting to arder at i:40 p.m. ROLL CALL: Memb�ers Present: Barbara Hughes. Ed Kaspszak, Ralph Stouffer Menb�ers Absent: Burt Weaver, Duane Peterson � Oti�ers Present: Clyde Moravetz. City of Fridley Chris Wegener, Storer Cable , Dawn Gilbertson, Storer Cable Randy Johnson, Storer Cabte James Erickson� Attorney representing Storer Cable APPF;OVAL OF APRIL 19, 1984, CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES: NOT1'ON BY MR. STOUFFER, SECONDED BY J�t. KASPSZAK, TO APPROVE THE APRIL 19, 1984, CAT6' ADVISORY COAlMISSIDN MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UP0111 A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON XUGHES DECLARED THE MOTION CAI2XIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADOF'TION OF AGENDA: The following items were added to the agenda under "Other Business": a. ACCW First Quarter Report 1984 b. Update on Meeting Regarding Possibility of Interconnecting Columbia Heights Senior High and Fridley Senior High for Exchange Teaching Possibilities MOT.�QN BY J�lR. STOUFFER� SEC�ONDED BY 1�lR. KASPSZAK� TO APPROVE :ilE AGEIJDA AS Al►�1JDED. UPOIV A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON XUGHES DECLA.ZED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. 1. RECEIVE OPERATIONS UPDATE FROt1 STORER: Mr. Wegener stated he wanted to update the Commission on four points, referring to the Business Plan they submitted: � 1. They are launching the FM Service on June lst at 52.95. 2. Their door-to-door sales campaign is under way, and they hope to increase their installations from 8 per day right now to 20-30 . per day very shortly. � 8A CAT�J ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING MAY 17 1984 PAGE 2 3. He stated that regarding the sample audit, at the last meeting he told the Commission members he wou7d be giving them sample figures. He stated that in Fridley they came up with 2.6� ba�ic �heft for � non-subscribers. For the pay service, the figure was 15.5�. He stated the basic theft was started off by the apartment dwellings, because the Lheft is higher there. The discrepance in single famiiy homes was 2.3� while it was 4.5� in the apartment dwe7lings. He stated the sample audit was 13� of the City--1,475 homes were audited. 4. He stated the idea of a cab�e guide that Walt Berdnik had proposed has been dropped. Mr. Moravetz stated a question had arisen regarding the possible addition of Spectrum Sports to cable. He understood there was a contract that was formulated by the Storer attorneys that was being reviewed by Spectrum. He asked t4r. Wegener to briefly update the Comnission on this possibility. Mr. Wegener stated the negotiations started some time ago, and they are now on the fourth or fifth revision of the contract. He stated they are getting close to an agre�ment, but there are many uncertainties right now about the future of Spectrum. KOTION BY MR. KASPSZAK, SECONDED BY !!R. STOUFFER, TO ACC�PT THE OPERATIONS �_ UPDATE FROM STORER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CtlAIRPERS01,1 HUGNES DECLARED THE lNOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. RECEIVE REPORT AND REVIEW ON VARIANCE RE SITE LOCATIONS: ST FROM STORER TO REDUCE TEST Mr. Moravetz stated the Comnission members had received the report in their agenda packet. and it was quite self-explanatory. Basically� they followed the variance procedure in lieu of amending the ordinance. which would involve time-consuming public hearings. He stated the ordinance called for one publication, and it has been published in the local paper twice. As mandated in the ordinance, no public hearing will be held unless 7 or more persons make a written request for a hearing. He stated he has not received any comments, either verbal or written. He stated Staff's recommendation would be to approve the variance as requested. !lOTIGN BY l�i. KASPS2AK� SECOdBDED BY 1NR. S20UFFER, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY CO IC LUN QN1�lY I7, 298Q, APPROVAL OF THE REpUESTED VARIANCE TO SECTION 4.11 OF THE CABLE COMMUNICATIANS AGREEMENT TEST AND COMPLIANC� PROCEDUItES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON HUGHES DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED IINANIJNDUSLY. � CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 17, 1984 ___ PAGE 3 3. RECEIVE AND REVIEW TECHNICAL REPORT: � Mr. Moravetz stated the various tests that Randy Hanson'�nd Keith Hennek followed on this testing procedure were right out of the franchise ordinance, qn page 22 of the agreement, there was some question as to whether there was an actual test such as Chromas to Luninance Dela . In looking at the Storer proposal, it looked �ce it was a typograp ica error as there was ane test for Chroma and Luminance Delay, which Mr. Hanson and Mr. Hennek �onducted. T e next proce ure was t e Chromas to Luninance Dela . Con- sequently, they did not make that test as ere was no suc procedure. Apparently, it was a typographical error that started way back and was just mever corrected. 'Since Mr. Weaver was not at the meeting, the Canmission members felt this �report should be continued until the next meeting. �INOTION BY MR. KASPSZAK, SECONDED BY AII2. STOUFFER, T�O CONTINUE THE REIVEW ��F THE TECHNICAL REPORT UNTIL T1�E NEXT MEETINC. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSOI� NUGFiES DECLARED TXE 1NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. DISCUSSION REGARDING RATE INCREASE REQUEST: Mr. Moravetz stated the Cortmission members should have received a copy of the formal request for a rate increase from Storer dated May 4, 1984. He stated there wasn't any opinion on Exhibits A, B, C, D, and he had requested Storer to take some responsibility for the credence of those exhibits. Since then, he has received a letter dated May 10, 1984, from Frederick Rolandi, Regional Business Manager for Storer. stating the financial data was a fair and accurate representation of the financial condition of General Television of Minnesota's Fridley Operations. NOTION BY NR. STOUFFER� SECONDED BY l�2. KASPSZAK, TO RECEiVE TXE LETTER l�ATED PlAY 10, 1984, FR01►! FREDERICK ROLANDI, TO BE ATTACHED TO TXE APPLICA- TIt�N FOR RATE CHANGE, TO COUNCIL. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON HUGHES DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIl�lDUSLY. Mr. Moravetz stated the City Council also received these copies. At the last City Council meeting, it was the general concensus of the City Council that they were going to set and hear the public hearing on this initially. and after the public hearing, decide whether they wouid like to hire a rate consultant and get the cable comnission more involved at that time. He stated the City Coun�il will be discussing this more on Mon., May 21. Mr. Moravetz stated he was asked to formulate a resolution for the City Council establishing a public hearing, along with a sample publication notice. He gave the Comnissioners copies of the drafted resolution and 8C CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, MAY l7, 1984 ___ PAGE 4 sample publication notice. If the City Council approves this resolution, the publication will be made in the May 30 and June 6 Fridley Sun and � would involve a public hearing at City Council on June i8.� Mr. James Erickson stated he was the attorney representing Storer Canmuni- cations. He stated they have submitted the application for rate change, and as far as they are aware, it is complete. They are looking forward to going before the City Council on June 18, and at that time, they will elaborate on the documents found in the submission and will answer questions. Mr. Erickson stated they think the most relevant factor in the rate increase is to look at what other similar systems are charging throughout this marketplace and throughout the country. They believe this proposed increase to $10 is clearly supported by other communities around the metropolitan area in spite of the fact that this will still leave Storer in a negative • cash flow situation. Mr. Moravetz stated Storer has submitted some of the basics calle�l for in the ordinance, but the ordinance also states that they must provide any other information the City might desire. Mr. Moravetz stated that under Attachment D, he thought the basic rates given might be questionable. Minneapolis was listed as $10.95 for a basic rate. He stated there is a release out by the FCC that basic service is identified as the least expensive tier of service on a cable system. He knew Minneapolis had a service for a2.95 a month so that could be interpreted to be $2.95 as opposed to �10.95. The reason he brought this point up was that the ordinance states that if any rate increase exceeds 30% of the norm for the 7-county metro area, the cable operator would re- imburse the City for any costs incurred in the reviewal process. He stated this should be a consideration and Storer might want to bring some further documentation or some further clarification on those basic rate columns in Attachment D.as this is a question the City Council will probably ask. MOTION BY NR. S11�iJFFER, SECONDED BY MR. KASPSZAK� TO RECOMMEND Tt� CITY COUNCIL THAT THB CITY COUNCIL HOLD A PUBLZC NEARING ON JUNE 28� I984, ON THE CABLE RATE ZNCREASE REQUEST ACCORDING TO TXE DRAFTED RESOLUTIOdV. UPON A VOICE Vt�TE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON HUGHES DECIARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Hugfi es stated the Conmission members should try to attend this public hearing. 5. RECEIVE UPDATE ON MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF CABLE TELEVISION ADMINISTRATORS CTA ON DIRECTION TAKEN ND PROGRLSS f1ADE TO DA7E Burt Weaver : INOTION BY NR. KASPSZAK� SECANDED BY l�t. STOUFFER, TNAT Z10 THE ABSENCE OF J�II2. i�EAVER� THIS ITEM BE CONTINUED UNTIL TXE NEXT 1►�ETZNG. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL i�DTING 14YE, CHAIRPERSdV AUGHES DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. : � CATV AOVISORY CCMMISSION MEETING MAY 17, 1984 PAGE 5 6. RECEIVE UPDATE AND DISCUSSION ON ME7R0 AREA INTERCONNECTION COMMISSION: . p.. �r. Moravetz stated he attended another meeting of the Metro Area Inter- connection Comnission the previous week at which there was no quorum. ,Again� for the second week in a row, there was a lot of discussion regard- ing Regional Channel 6 mandated by the State Cable 8oard. He stated his desire to get involved with the Interconnection Comnission and recommenda- tions to the Comnission as such was for clean-up and to get some education, perhaps some sense of direction, and some technical help from this group regarding the four school districts in Fridley and how they could be interconnected. �r. Moravetz stated there was a general cancensus that the In�erconnection Comnission wants to be involved with the negotiations in establishing who �will run Regional Channel 6 and who will oversee it. By the end of the �eeting, he had the impression that perhaps the Interconnection Comnission �i11 not want to be involved with the operation of it. �r. Moravetz stated there was another meeting of the Interconnection Comnission on Wed., May 23, at Crystal City Hall. 1. �OTHER BUSINESS: a. ACCW First Quarter Report 1984 Ms. Hughes stated the Comnission had also received a copy of a memo from Mr. Maravetz stating that the ACCW has hired two part-time coordinators to replace Will loew-Blosser. JNOTIDN BY PlR. STOUFFER, SECONDED BY 1HR. KASPSZAK� TD RECEZVE TKE ACCW IF RST QUARTER REPORT 198Q. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CXAIRPERSQN HUGHES DECLARED THS NOTION CARRIED UNANII�lOUSLY. Mr. Moravetz stated the City has also hired a replacement for, Rob� Penaloza as media specialist. Her �ame is Angela Forrest. He understood the Anoka County Library is also in the process of hiring a new media specialist. He stated he thought the schools were going to get involved, so possibly in the not too distant future, the FCC (Fridley Cable Consortium)will become active again. where these people will get together once a month for brainstorming ideas for programning suggestions. b. Update on Meeting Regarding Possibility of Interconnecting Columbia Heights Senior High and Fridley Senior High for Exchange Teaching Possibilities Mr. Moravetz stated he met some time ago with Bob Barnette� Wiil Loew-8losser, and Dick Stanton regarding getting something 8E CATY ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING MAY 17 1984 PAGE 6 going on the educational channel. They have apparently gotten sane direction from Dr. Rens who wants to tap the potential of cabje in the comnunity. Ne stated Mr. Stanton is still talking to Columbia Heights and the different media teachers in the school district to see how they can best utilize the cable channel. Mr. Moravetz stated he had a meeting that day with Dr. Rens, Dick Stanton, and 8ob 8arnette. Apparently, Mr. Stanton has been talking to the principal of Columbia Heights Senior High, and they are talking about some teacher exchange for next year. Mr. Moravetz stated he is Norking out what it would cost to wire the two schools. The hardware would probably run about $21-24,000. That was a little high so they are now exploring the possibility of micro- waving. He stated he has to get some costs to Dr. Rens on this possi- bility by the first of June so Dr. Rens can provide this information to the School 6oard at their June meeting when the budget will be decided for the next school year. Mr. Moravetz stated he was very optimistic about this meeting. He stated he was asked if he would be the facilitator between Fridley and Columbia Heights and research this further. He stated that if the Comnission had no problem with his doing this, he would proceed. Ms. Hughes stated this was great news. She stated anything the Commission or Mr. Moravetz could do to aid in this process should be done. It was certainly within the scope of what the Comnission would like to see happen. MOTIAN BY MR. STDUFFER, SECONDED BY MR. KASPS2AK, T11AT THE CITY SHOULD BE IN THB POSITION OF ENCOURAGING THE SCXOOL DISTRSCTS' COOPEftATIOl� IN SHARING THROUGH GABLE RESDURCES, AND THAT 1N12. MORAVETZ BB INSTRUCTED 41D DiD EVERYTHINC. NECESSARY TD FACILITATE TXIS CODPERATION. UPON A VbICE VOTE� ALL YOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON AUGHES DECLARED TXE MOTION CARI2IED UNANIIHOUSLY. 8. COt�FIRM DATE FOR NEXT MEETING: 1�he Comnission members agreed to have their June meeting after the City Gouncil public hearing on June 18. However, if another meeting was still required, they would meet on Thurs., June 21. ADJOLIRNMENT • Chair•person Nughes declared the May 17, 1984, CATV Advisory Commission meeting adjourned at �:40 p.m. Resp�ctfully submitted, Lyn . Saba Reco�ding Secretary ..- . FRIDLEY CABLE TEi.EVISION C0t4'IISSION Report and revieW on requested variance to 5ection 4.11 of the Cable Communications Agreement TesC And Coigoliance ProcedLres � !!ay 1�Itb� 1984 L�rafted by: Clyde V. Horavetz, Cable Coordinator T�ecommended by: CaDle Television Commission 17th Barbara Hughes� Chair, on this day of M , 1984 A.pproved by the Fridley City Council on this � day of __ � 1g84. 8F �G The City of Fridley has received applicatian for a variance to the above mentioned section of the Cable Ordinance (aee atta�hed Exhibit A). This variance procedure was approved by the City Council at tbeir April 16th� 1984 meetiag. An application fee of =50.00 Was aubmitted at the time of application (aee attached Exhibit B) as mandated in Section 405.13•6• The variance procedures are also outlined in this aection (refer to Lhe last Lhree pages of E�chibit A). The public notice requirements have been met (see attached Exhibit C) and ae have not received any tirritten requests for a hearing. As noted in the Storer application, the variance reduces the number of test aites at subscriDer terminal locations. The request� in my opinion� is a minor deviation from the companya' offering and is eonsistent With the apirit of the franchise. As I mentioned in the March 26th memo (Exhibit A), there are approximately 107 miles of trunk and distribution eable in Fridley. The FCC requires Lhree (3) test aites per 100 miles of cable. This would result in a minimum of 3 locations. The requested reduction is from 20 - 7 locations. The City required tests will still douDle the FCC requiremeats. In light of the reasonableness of the variance request, the noncontroversial nature of it and the lack of any public comment resulting from the official notices, I recommend that the City approve the variance application. The approval ahould be eonditioned upon continued quality reception. If, in the future� quality service degenerates� the City should reserve Lhe right to reinstate additional testing locations as deemed necessary Dy the City. T..s c�t� O� . .-." � v pIqECTORATE OF �;;��c woRKs � �1 � � � � � r� TE ��th 26. 1984 Moravetz-Cable Admi Cab1e Vari�nce Request MEMO N0. 84-47 John F1 e Fschibit "A" p U _ O t' MEMORANDUM �=' � ACTIONI INFO• The Cable operator at the March 15. 1984 Cable Comission meeting informally requested an amendment to the Cable Franchise revising Section 4.11 "Tests and Compliance Procedures" of the CATV Agreement. My suggestion was to submit a letter requesting a variance in lieu of a time consumin� amendment procedure. The Commission approved Dy recortmendation and the Cable operator has since submitted a formal request for variance. (See attached letter from Storer dated March 22, 1984.) The City o�f Fridley has approximately 107 miles of Trunk and Distribution cable. The FCC requir�es three test sites per 100 miles of cable. i believe the 20 test locations as present.ly mandated in our ordinance was taken from the Northwest Cable Ordinance which has 900 miles of table. The requested reduction from 20 to 7 locations does not appear unreasonable. , The variar�ce procedure was recommended by the noncontroversial nature of the ordinance alteratior►. (See attached procedures as outlined in the Cable Ordinance Section 405.13 6.) Please adwise in order for me to prepare the appropriate notices and beg�� the review process. CVM/de �� .* . 0 a 8I ST�O R LE �'ommilmcnl /o E�►cc/k�nce March 22, 1984 ;- Mz. Clyde Mozavetz City of Fridley 643i University Avenue yE Fzidley, tR7 55432 Deax Clyde: � As ]Randy Hanson discussed with you at last week's Cable Corunission Meeting, Storet Cable requests a vari�nce to Section 4.11, "Tests and Com�liance Procedures." The section would remain unchanged except Where the words that are lined out would be deleted and substituted by the underlined words immediately after as follows: Those tests described in Storer's offering shall be conducted as follows: The tests will be performed periodically, at intervals no greater thnn c�-•��rJ .:ix (6) months, on a minimum of twentY-{�g} seven (7) subscriber le�evieien-reeeiv�r� terminal locations, located through- out City. At least eight-�8� four (4) of these locations shall be at the far end of the distribution trunk cable. The tests shall be witnesseC by zepresentatives of City and written reports shall be submitted to City. If more than ten percent (108) of the locations tested fail to meet the performance standazds, Storer shall indicate what corrective measuzes have been taken and the entire test shall be repeated for at least twentM-{�A� seven (7) nifferent locations. A second failure of more than ten percent (108) may result, in accorc;ance with Section 7.07 (C) in a teduction of subscriber rates in that area due te degraded service. The cost of such testing shall be paid by Storer. Ne believe that these new pzocedures would still adequately test oux signal transmissions yet reduce the unnecessary burden required by the oriqinal procedures. STOaER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS 350 •(3rd Avenue N.E.. Fridley, Minnescta 55432 Pnone 571�206 8J Mr. Clyde Moravetz, cont'd. page two Please find enclosed a check for S50.00 to cover the variarsce filing fee. Thank you foz your consideration of this sequest. ti�. ui,,� (,�u ; ��: ti � � Chzia Wegemer Distz�ict General Manager CW:nm Encl. EK� S'I�O R LE ca.►��,�„o �►��,�e ,: - �PRIL TESTS .__.-_ 1. 7671 Brigadoon 2. Geozgetowri 5750 3. Behind 5311 4th Stzeet 4. Corner of Stinson Blvd. and Bziazdale Road 5. 961 Rice Creek Terrace 6. Behind Shorewood Plaza 7. 180 Nartman Cr. OCTC�BER TESTS lA. 465 Kimball Street 2A. 40�5 � Main Street West - 2 spans on 40� Avenue 3A. 1533 Berne Road �A. 7400 Fridley Terzace Park SA. Cornez of 7th i 61 Ave. - 2 spans East 6A. Corner of Rice Creek and 4th Stzeet 7A. 1605 66�5 Avenue Note some of these test points may change due to subscribez count on �ezminal locations. STOREp CABLE COMMUNICATIONS 35p - 63r0 Avenue N.E.. Fridley. Minne�ots 55432 Phone 571�206 .� . .� '1�_ � ,•S� • � _ ;:"�� j \ .i�i 0 1..-�-= : ::.;:. ' __• -_• ..• ._ .:w,4: s, vo►.w j-?'t voa► � .• .:�s ;::':'4� =� -- s�was �l s+wors `�' "'P• •:� �i iiE � - � , � s:: -- �� = i- " -_ _L..�t.r. �;, _ —r , --- ' � __ = !Y _ � r =- ) • . _ • �,:. ~ � ��.� �' �tR i. _.:. � ' �' � == -_._. :- -.. .� ti . :__ `"r ` � v ;+ ,:.�: ,11� = =- � =— , ' . G-- � � •; � - � _ � �: ` ' ` -=' � � +; � _ _ _ 'r�"`� �/ � ._ �-�'t � ��_ ��'.Ll�ti �•� =• -� - _ -, 't�� =1 ��, .� � � �' =i�_ C';; =_i� ��- A � '. '-e _ � � s�t• ;�"� , .� % '� ;,;`/-.=�: � ! - �� 1 -� , - •.�•' - _ t ' -- i . ; � � � ' _� � - , - - -� 'i . � •� ,��cri 1 � 1 �•• � '�' � .-- h. ��--` �� -._� ' •.. .:�: _-_ .r; ., �, -�- .� E • 7� �� i:,- =k••: �:' • w�Y:= �r•�' � ' _ � �u'�I' ',��'�...•• •'`"• •' •� _ \ — �"1.��;� � ��; ,• � _ .� �� :,�i'r �y� � •�' , ��` �' � � V�� •1" �.t. � r_ 1 � \� ` , .. �� I � 1 '�'�`� � , 1.'�1'-'•' ��'� ;� � � 1 � � i � � � ��. � �i •I 1� � ; .{ � `! ' r. �'� �� i � .7' � .1 1 ' � , i.. �YI 1 i � � . ..� . I' � ' ' � � � ; . � ' .1� ' �, 1 ' �, � � �' �� .; : 7::_=. - . , , , � 1 _ , _ - . _ � ►::�.�,...;� __- ,i�� ,� �:jr . �]_ � �,�_ � �� s .��. .� � ,. �•� , � � _: � - i' _ ; M b �:;,,,. �� ,,: - . -- .._ « • _.� , ' 1 � : .. - . ��,� , � - - - "-- ' 3 _, �. �__ � ql � -_ _ ,t � �.•'',�. :f � ; .' _ t. - . • - � i � 1 ' � � � � l ��'i? �__ ' . -'� ' � _ ;...{. - � , - -. _ ��, �� - = , T ;_' �; '�' ��-' � �s��`;:::�i , �' ;�?�►------ - - �1 � � �-Z�. ' � �.,� _`1 _v ., : i �__-� � _ „� � � " ' � S i �`=+ ' _� a�_/. •- � ... �, � s � -� � �1r- � � rr- :;� ` ;� ' � - ,,: •�- �T-_ ,;_ :�..,;—�._- � �� -�, �- _ =�-y _. ., - ,r. _ = � i . <_ <� _� '1� _ � , - - - 1;' *�'_ `.= 3� � _ � = '!�, -: •:� - - _ - ' - � � r. __�_�_� IlJ_�_�.�: s- � ` 1) j 1 � _,; • �� i _ , � � �' _ � l t�' • � Tl� � � ;s-?I�� . �� ! • � � • �.�•'��i�` • � S.. ;,1; , . . . _*,_' �_' :• ;I w . --.� g'c €;• _-a:= _. -•• --- --�.�' �' s.'�: . �^;-_; _ � ..c : : �si - • ��:_e �Bi:_c.: �- ' T.�' : L L�:�.' • = � _ � • � � - .t . ' �T: : ��f s �.'• . ��i ' � � L _� _ �� % • � s r.r_: L �r}• s #�t _. _ _' �� ' �iyt• t �L'• _ � � � � �- T= L S T�-: �-=� - `•- = _ T}� • i �� `- � ��s t� �� ;'_�" -:�_'�.' � z=' i ' ; - - � _ =■ �T' - r� T r = � 1 � �' � � �S` � � ��L. . _ � �S7• � • �•. L ��. �` • � � �� T• • �� ,� L �S � �_ ! L T' �� -_ _ g =. - �r -: ' ;ti • .'r ; - � ; _• E e r E : -- ' E �^� -. �n=' E �4 � f? -'_ � � t s: e e _ �ii F E�: : �+�� TREET MAP-CITC� sL_= �= _ FRIDLEY =� =� ��-. =�.'�: .r� --� - `--"` . _ —._, _ 8L 8M sud� dete=mination and not3oe of sud� p�lic hiishu99 notice thereof f,�=t�n (1�) days prior tor�eche�ation in the e►rea being served. once in a ne�wspaper af 9ene �e noti ae 6ha11 ocntain the aate, time ar►d �lave o� !he hearing and shall briefly �� e 6�� 'e ac�tion to be considered by City. , �. . t4) i�ithin thfrty (30) days after the public hearing► �e City shall apprave or �Y s errs�hall not be �reasonaGlY Mit2�held. � wal of the 6ale o� tian f (S) City shnll notify the Board of �Y ��ansrofra fundamentsl Frar�chise, including � sale oz trnnsfer by oorpornte chanqe. The notification 6ha11 be accompanied Dy the vritten oertif ication of the transferee that it meets all of the =equire�ments vith tespect to technical Ci y sh lldcause to be 6tability dananded of the orginal Grantee. �ent to Board � ocpy of a11 public dx�nen� zelated to the iale or tlansfer. t6) Grantee, upon tsansfer� shall, vithin sixty I60) days, thereafter file with the City a copy of the deed, agreement, mcrtgage, lease or othez vritten instzumer►t evidencing such 6ale, transfer of oWr�ership or ccntsol or lease, oertified ar�d svorn to as ocrtect by the Gr�tee. B. In revieWing a reqvest for e•ale or transfer p�usuant to paragraph t1U above, the City may irquire into the qual if ications of the prospective oontsolling party and Grantee 6ha11 assit the City in so inquiring. The City m3y oondition said transfer upon 6uch teims and conditions as it deer�s appropriate. Zn the at�sence of extraotdinar circumstances, the City shall not approve arry transfer or assi��e S�sthemFrascdeter�ined to substantial ca�letion of oonstruction of y �olely by the Cityol � a° ioved vithout the transfereesbe oming�a ownership or contr PP sic�ata to this Frar�chise. S. Cflndc�u�+atian. Grantee shall reoeive up�n ocrxZetv�ation Pzxe�ngs bzou9ht by City to aaquire S� sten, oor�er•satioo the FYanc2�isehin the event of te�inationf or�e�irati n.� s�,all be attached t ..�...� 6. �nen�t of orainances ana varianaes. A. lynen3a�t o� iYanchibe Ordinanoe• 1lfter pUblishea nctiae. P�blic rearings and deliberations of th� Council of City. this Frar�chise uay be a�'� �'P°n fO� tj) +�fia�ative vot� of the Co�cil of City and the wiitten ocrsse�t of Grar�tee. 8. Variance l�pQlications and Prooe��• t� the Franchise 1lc�nini6trator 8etenoines that a ro se� chan e SN teratior� ot substitution in Grantee'6 Offerin vill be noncontroversi � na ure e o a+�ing roce u,�rei v�� =��e�an'� :.: : �:: .::, o..�a r a�r a�i�iJ� �e. • (1 �e i�car�chise 1�cininistratoc 6ha11 give notice of the intention c?,ange, alter or substitute a provision of the Offering vithout public hearing. The notice shall be given by publication in the of f icial rewspaper of City. �e noti ae st�al l incluae a sum�ary of the proposed change, slteration or substitution. The notf ce ehall lnclude a atatenent aavising the publics �(a) �i�at they ?�ave t:en �10) days in vhich to sutrr,it comment on the pra,posea change, altecatior� or substitution� �(b) �►at no public bearing vill be �eld unless ceven (7) or more persons make a vritter� request for a hearing within the ten (10) day carme�t peziod; and �� Of the �r isu~aihitto�t2�r is 6ubdivisio�r� uest a �ear ing on chnnges Propo P� (2) Applications for variance shall De filed vith the Franchise .,irtiistratar ar�d subject to the folla�►ing proced�uess (a) �►n, a lication f o F'ft �a�g plus actual oosts �ncurr � i, u n.g o�� O� ou�v��v`v7 an s 1 0 1 a--�-rcan a e rr,e "o� a�pr ova o a =eavest or variance Jhr� application for variance may nclude more t an one variance request if tT�e Frnnchise 1►�.inistratos or City detesmines ihat t2�ere i6 6ufficient 6i�r,ilarity or telationships betWee� i6sues to varcant the use of only one (1) application. (b) The Franct�ise 1laministrator shall qive notice of the application to City ar�d Grantee of the date, time and place for revieW of the applicatioc�. (c) �e FYar�chise l�ci"►inistrator shall review the application vithir� fourteen (14) ealendar daYs of publication of the notice ta�less a public Dearing i6 required. �d) In the event a public henring is required, the hearing shall be held vithin ten (10) calendar aays after demand for euch a hearing has been met. �e Franchise Adr*,inistratoz shall review► t2�e app]ication vithin feven (7) calendaL days of the eenclusion of t3x p�lic hearin9• �e) City �hall receive a� �� etinh f lloving the date Franchise l�d-�irustratar at i 9 o� review by the i�canchise 1�ninistratac. (f) The variance vill De ae ��a a�proved by fout (4� if f iara ve v es e � � : � � �the iYar�ch se il►�nini�st�ratorear�81 hall9belincluded irlilthe de by =epert to Cit](• ' �a) The requestea variance is a �ninor deviation f rom tAe Offering and is consistent vith the Ftanchise i� the �ole ju�nt o� City. �b) 11pp1 i ca t3 0� in a hazcishiP to be detr i�aental to of the pzwisions of the Franchise toay result the appl i cant ar�d to gr ant a var iar�ce voul d not other af fected pnrties. tc) Due to expense or delsy, it vould be unreasonable to peifect sudi changes by Ordinance a�ne�nent• �d) th�due delay, expense or other adver6e results vill not occur by approval of the teguired varianoe. �e) If a variance is because var iance vi11 zesult in equal st ef f iciercy. 7. Severability � t�chnical or cASt reasons, the or better technical 6tandards or Ii any section, 6ubsection, centence, clause, phrase or pertion �uit�or Ordinance is, for any reason, t,eia i��ia or �a'�°nstltutional by �Y a�}..�st=au�e agency of oc��et�t jurisdicrtion, 6uch portion shall be deemed � separate, clistinctofn�e^�e� i�� °tiions thereo��ch a holding 6ha11 not af f�ect the val i di ty 105.14. R18i.IGTIDN 1ht�ID F.i'ii�L'rIVE � 1� pub2icatio�; Effective Date. �is Ozdinance shall be sic�ea b�' the Mayor ar�d attested by the City Clerk. 7T� is Ocdinance sha11 be published vithin fifteen �15) days aftez adop�fiits 7�e Ordinance sha11 take effect fifteen t15) daYs +�fter the last c1a�or iate put�lication in the official ne�+spePe= af City. �is Ordinance maY P° by referg►ce, without publicationr� f f1G=��1Le °'� ��sota or a rule of the Board or the FCC and the Offe g 2. Publ i ca ti on of t�oti ces. J111pub lic notiaes reguired tc be Pu�list'e� by' Ci�S'. �luding this Ordinance. sh;sll be gublishea in the o�ficial ne�speper af City. Grantee 6ha11 paY the �sts for publicaticn of this Ordinance. a Rate Ordinancer ar�d amendments to t2�en, as sud�, publication is required by lar+• ). Roceptance Proc.e3are. 1 A. Grar�tee 6ha11 acoePt the Fic�'r'ci'1�� iubject to obtaining a Renewa Certificate of Confianation, 3n form an8 substo ��ecapplication forlthe pz ior to the Bc�a r d ocnducting a publ i c n�eeti n9 R�al Certificate oi Cazfirnatia►� �ess the time for acceptance i6 �•.w•.. . . �. � �� r� � � �� ww�,� iO�lT�4 �Si 1�1i� • � S�� «.nowu �.�.� a r.�uw �w. R ��„��,;� .,�s RD No. 3 0 9 7 4 2 � ;• . r .�.,,,,,... �T�� MVpCE MO N/A W►?E � � . . p., � •M,,.�. � TN� v �' �� .� .•�i `, �� .. : 3-'1-A. -�t..:• c5n nn,..��*�: . .. . . ..... ....... .. .. ... . � , . �; , � • • �p111•M0 i�f MO R►hD11A1T �UfM MO •�. �r� �•�•.��I �. (•� .......... ............. ....................... SSS 166 JE936 City oi �Fridley �� ........... ............... ... ` i . , .. ... . .............. . . .1LL �(, � �i L1 L � Fridley, !IX � SS432 ................................... {....•�.��,.«..�.,_ ..�...; .,,.«,,;;,,., ti Vw` A•N 1w+•�+�. �Ar� w ti�iw. I.��sI�" Yti�� rw f/. C� O� �e I�'v�r•,ti .�v' .�� . .a+•� �� +�. � w r�./ � � � e w �r s�.. �. r+e w ��r- r w �s+ _ __ _ —� � ' ' _ ' M 309?�. 2��' �:06600058 L�: � i l L 0 2�. L 5�'S?90 � ; - L �fc �! �� 7 c. ..� �, .c c c: c�-� j �- � 2 - � y , , �,� .f� �� -. _ _ �4�' � ^Adfald AMeW�� . tV�LIC NOTIC[ E�tY 0► /SIpL[Y bl�e mnte► M � tepuMW ��M- upe b �eccleo •.0 d ne c•ae Tti��ld�o Ir��Al�e Asnemeot �f�wt a0 /ance PneMue�.. ��Oe b 3urer�iWe. • ' !1e �eeteieepa ��uld rerle o- ',!� e�wW Aektad ud ruD- �tltrted er �e !oW �erA� IiameNate- d �Rer w /�� T►ese teu• N�erDN U ltorer'� �Ilerl� �WI �e aM- �cted o lW�� 71e wt� �111 �e /eriormed �erNdlcaly. �l ie- tervab �o �reater tL� e.er� �I: �pl enosW. w • �luawm N �'�Y�� K� (TI w�0�er1ler tA�M�w� wcyN�ier�h�� N• e�W„. Ioe�1�d throu��-�ot Cllr At ka�l t1lM �M Iwr 1� � M IAe�e bc�tlon� �lull !e �1 lhe tar ead o( t�e dutrteuuoe wnt e�We TAe tMta sAall !e �iteet�ed pr nPre- �aetatives N CN� ��d �ntuc ROons �Aall ee roMnlKed b crr tr OIN't tAiO t!O �..ceo� tN�F 1 of tAe locauoe� terted r,i� le meet tAe �eHxeiaac� �4n- a.m. ston►.e.0 �wu.q.�n �cwreeure me��ures �ave Meo bLen aad tDe eeun te�t WL !e ; ►epeated for �1 leart w�wlfAM r�� 7� dlfferect lee�tloa� A �ecood t�llun �f mon We bo �erceet (10�4) mq resWt. le �c- cordaece �ft� ieclwe t p/CI le a eeduetion ef �oA�eriAer ntw ia Wt ana dre W de�raMO ur• �lee. Tfe eeM d w� Wtla� Aall De Pa10 0r ltere►. Cemmeeb �1l1 k naelw/ vltAln 1�a tD) dan �f tA4 e�tfhc�tloe No �birc �eartn� �Yt ►e eoed�ed ue� �evee (7) w mere oerwo� mate • �rtnee�epuest for � 4aru� �IWio t�! teo IN) 4y comm101 yeMd 11e �rancAl�e Adml�iuralsr wall tt�le� t�e yp 1{ntioe vlt�i� leur- tee� ( N) nlesdar d��s �t yopbcalioo �f Ne aouee �ules� � wWk �eatie[ u �R�n tee (!�) e�ksA�r daY� �Re► annaed for rue! �earin� h�i Mea oel Tfe rnac��e Admimnnur .e.0 �e.�fe. e�e ap uuu.o .a�ln .r.�. m e.kea.r �ar•.t u� e..- dwbe of tLe Aearl�s (weet� ot Avril t�_ f 10. 1�)•relD � Fschibit "C" 8 0 cTnR � R � ��a ��E JACKSON MEMORIAL MK�MWAY, FA�iFAX, VA 22033 (7031352•�700 .. , .... �. . CpwM��uCA7wha • OrC. �r. C].yde Moravetz City c>f Fridley 6431 L;niversity Avenue, N.E. Fridely, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Moravetz: Please be advised City ��n March 26, 1984, zate increase request, dated May 4, I984, is � financial condition of Operations. ,•. May 10, 1984 that the financial data provided to the in conjunction with Storer Communications' anc] which is a part of the formal application fair and accurate representation of the General Television of Minnesota's Fridley Should you have any questions on the above referenced financial information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely. STORER COM.i�!UNICATI027S, INC. LZ�+h�• Frederick S. Rolandi Regional Business Manac+er RR/ l ;j b 8R 8S TC� AGCES VERYONE'8 TELEV1810N GMANNEL ANOKA COUNTY COl41IJNICATIONS i10RKSHaP, II�iC. gIRST QUARTER REYORT 1984 �� - Jaauary, February� and March at the MorkahoQ �eze ceatered oa TELETHON �ctivity. The most successful year to date. ve have received pledges tot�ling over s2,600. No matching funds were offered thia year. Tbe lazee�t aingle doa�iian seceived vaa a suzprise $500. donation from S.A.A.M.I. through the Fridley Fire Fighter'a Aasoci�tion. Theis Fire Fighter'a Traiaia� Tape on �amunition firea vas recently completed at the Wozkshop. Events at TELETHON included tbe 'Handicapped In Access' program preaented by Jim Bauer� TBLETtiOAI Chairperaon; 'Youth In A�cceaa' by Scott Briggs and John P. King, Who brought in an amazing amount of talent from the Fridley High School; presentations by the Ciwrch of St. William's; comedy by Jeff Sicharda; Mike Bednarchuk vitb his a+a 'Fridley Poll' and 'In Focus'; comedy With Bob Sisel; all-day commentary and the premiere of 'Telecide '84' by Larry Hutchinsoa; and entertainment on 'The Terry Lovaas Show 3-Ring Circus' With Terry and Mark Neuman-Scott� TELETHON Co-Chairperson Dringing a hil.arioua line•up of �uesta not excluding our ovn Mayor Bill Nee. Fridl.ey cable aubscribers received a post card in their billing from Storer announcing the TELETHON tbis year� and the Fridley SUN had a photo and atory that week� ao we feel the publicity W�• firat sate. Hot oaly do ve attract donators, Dut We make more Qeople avare of the Workshop and their. opportunity to use the facility. Cert�ficates of Appreciation have been sent to all major contributors and sponsors. Individual doaators received a letter thanking them for their pled�e. In 11�ri1 before this report was aubmitted, We received Hill LoeW-Blosser's resi�nation notice. ilill vas the long-time Access Coordinstor for the Work�shop� and strong2y identified vith Chaanel 12. Me felt the situatioa was considerable enough to hold this report a feW weeks extra to include info•rmation on our plans. 1�o part-time coordinators have heen hired from a response of about 30 applications. Jerzy ite and Allison Qudolph Will be aetting up their achedules vith me ahortly. We expect they will be Working about T4 bours a veek each. pete l�lcLean vill be coming ia to teach a tech class specifically for Lbe access studio on the praper turn•on and minor maiateaance of all the equipmeat for tbe staff and poasibly aome of our membera. aalph Messer will De teachiag a class on tbe use of our audio board and oa �ound mixing. Aaoka•Bamsey sunmer classes Will be offered for the first time. in TV production and TV IntesnshiQ. i1e Will De hiring independent teac.hers fos these claases� as tLey vill be a separate job. lOKA COUNTY COMMUNICATION8 WO KSHOP. INC. _�_ O-83A0 AVENUE N.E. F IDL Y� INNESOTA d643� [��a�� 8T ANOY,A COUNTY COlQNNICATIONS WQtKSHOP� INC. ZIAST QUARTER REPORT 1984 Our regular claases vill be revised ali�htly Wbea they aze ssaumed. Studio I, Portable I and Basics of xditiag Will be aimilar to our previous clasaes. Studio II and Portable II xill be combined into aa Intermediate elaaa so that an all day clata vill be offered for 59.00. M�ck 1leuman-Scott lus �rrittea aome class hand-outs ttut vill be �vailable to all memb�ss of t%s classes. lid� for equipment maintenaace iuve beea sequested from Dave Sw►anson of Yideo MidWest, Pete McLeaa of Eroadcast Syatema Desi�n aad Kea Olaon of Todd Co�nunicatioaa� as the franchiae atatea that preventive maintenance and equipment repeir Will be handled by the company. They h�ve received copies of Liae attached list of equipment in the �ccesa studio� access po=tapaks, and acceaa VHS editiag room� and the caDlecaating center. Z�+o types of �ids - one for �oing thzough the aystem to aet�evezythia� corzectly and one !`or a quarterly maintenance cbeck Will be sent to Dawn Gilbertaon at Stor�r in pridley. I Wu►t to tiunk John Kin�� ltandy Dub�. Mike sednarchuk and Joel Kaudaen for kbeir volunteer hours aa atudio aupervisor• durin� the l�st fev veeks. I beYieve that the Workshop h�a aa uncor�on ability to be flexible and I ttunk our best volunteers for making the friendly •tmosphere that many of our 200 members have come to feel a part of. As well aa providing an impoxtant function in providing training and �ccess to the equipment aad the channel� th� Workahop has created an incr�diDle amouat of thp aease of co�unity iure. Tbe chengea coming in the Workshop vill be importaat and welcome� and I am aure the continuity vill only temporarily �e interrupted as xe aee the tr�nsition take Qlace within the next two montha as Alliaon and Jerry become fami.liar With the system and be�in incorposating their t�lents into the Morkahop. ;�_ �t,.� �� i .�,�;,tit,�cl�1 ' �C(`'LZ' Paul• J. Ne�nan-Scatt Dizector � � Aaoka County Coaznuaicatioas Workshop,�Inc. Quarterly Fiaancial Report for 12-31-83 to 3-31-84 Balance As Of 12-31-83 iacome: Ci ty � Ouea • � Telethon Crauts Workshops ACCW Anoka-Remsey Interest on Savings Other Payments for Videotape T-Shirts Phone Payments M�scellaneous Total Income E,►penses: Personal Services Selaries ACCW A-R Teachers A(:CW Teaching Assistants FHderal Taxes Deposited F�CA Taxes Deposited State Taxes Deposited Insurance HHalth Coverage Total Personal Services Ope��ating Expenses Telephoae Oi:fice Supplies Pr.iating Pc�stage Tot�l Operating Expeases Capital Outlay Equipment Mi.scellaneous Total Capital Outlay Balance As Of: 3-31-84 Submitted by: � ' � Paula J. euman-Scott Director of Operations 5,000.00 , 726.00 ' 1,115.00 681.00 1,250.00 341.35 162.00 48.00 20.32 2.00 - 4,612.62 300.00 25.00 621.20 906.90 370.00 90.00 288.37 49.90 201.60 1_ 54•75 12.61 .___.63+95 �16,452.67 t: 9�345.67 6,925.72 694.62 76.56 16 101.44 8U � . _ cinroF F�� o�TE 6/13/84 AOM �.►w Jo us�ECT OIFiECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS � ST 1984-10 Sealcoat Project �J M EMO R A N D UM PW 104-84 �.. ,. Pub.Wks. TO Nasim Qureshi, City Manager , We opened the bids for ST 1984-10 Sealcoat Project at 11:00 a.m. on Jume 12, 1984 in the Civic Center Corrmunity Room No. I. Four contr,actors had shown interest 1n the project. Three bids were recei �ved . Allied Blacktop was the low bidder. This ,�ear we again combined the sealcoat contracts of Columbia Heights and F�ridley. New Brighton did not join with us this year. The total quant�ity of work was about half as much as we bid last year. The unit price of 44¢ for buckshot and 65� for trap rock was up 7� and iq� per square yard from last year. The City's portion of the advertised project is $59,802.35. Recommend the City Council receive the bid and award the Fridley sealcaating portion to Allied Blacktop Company for $59,802.35. JGF:jmo ACTIONj INFp. BIO OPENING 11:00 a.m. Tuesday, June 12. 1984 1984 Sealcoating Pro3ect fri dl ey and Col urnbi a Nei ghts CON7RACTOR BID-60ND AMOUN7 � ' Allied Blacktap Co. '� 10503•89th Avenue N ', Maple 6rove, MN 55369 I 425-0575 8ituminous Roadways 2825 Cedar Avenue S Minneapolis. MN 55407 721-2451 Midwest Asphalt P.O. Box 338 Hopkins. MN 55343 937-8033 Batzer Construction Inc. P.O. Box 1025 St. Cloud, MN 56301 5� 5� 5� ��. s 85,#61.75 � 95,913.29 � 97,325.00 No Bid 9R 10 FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date:: June 13, 1984 84-6-1 Mema� To: Nasim Qureshi� City Manager Froa�: Robert D. Aldrich, Chief ��G'G'v. RE: Opticoss Bids Bid� were received on June 13, 1984 at 11:00 a.m. for installation of a Traffic Control System ( Opticoa ). One bid was received from 3M itn the amount of $27,941.25. Included in the bid are five inter- section controls and sixteen vehicle emitters. I rpco�end awarding of the contract to 3M. RDA,Igr Attachmente � . J � ^ v � � ., � � N ti y c 1� Q O i � m N C_' W � �"' � W J Q 2 O h- O C Q .�-� ... z W � W J W ;�� i� � �u .,r � �a c� .� � � -� � o Y .`" o 0 4+ e,�, ,_ �--� o z ^' L C° � � z ai� w � `L � � o a � � p 7 �J Cn � � ..�.�.► � �- «-. Q ~ m E E V b � 0 �x o �-- •• o �L ., � � 0 � � > � � � O L � � c 0 N � i c i I i I � , : , lU A 11 I' � If � �� ' I� � ,. I I � � ( � I I I! I , '� I � ! , i � � � I � �� ; , � i ; . � , � � � � ,, I j � � i� I , �, i I� ! i I� I i � � I ! � ; �� ; i� i , � i li ! ; i ' ,� � , , .� �: ! � �� , � ; � ;� , �i � , II � ' ' � i' � � �I � i i +; � j i ; '. � � � , ; I ,` ,. � i� i� �; i� � --- •- ------., - __. _ _.�. _ - - . . .. _ . .- _ _ ...r.. _� .. � � .J � 'I � 'm: bP�`QFICATIQ�1 �9-84-1 �- � y !t► : : �� /Y �_�.�/►G� 'f �1►�v • �Y . N i:�� :�- �� Mv • �• �� + • � '` - � 1�'e� 1�.• •�� - � �.- • „ ��' � �„le p�ropose to furnish and deliver to the�Cit�y� �o�==�� 1, he�elattached Traffic Si�al Renote Gontrol bysten tk�ati ) specii`ications• (OPTICOM) Manufacturer'6 Na��e 3M COMPANY SbSS Division Nanufacturer's Address Bld . 223-3N St. Paul Minnesota 55144 gp days af ter �e ��c,�e o�f oontreact�andenrec�et of Co taolle Box rints acoeptan P p Hase Bid (inclucles f ive intersections and f ive apparatus) : �� Eleven (11) a3ditional enitters S A�extrfieaixeb+e�kxar bidder's bcnd in the amo�a�t af S�...'�3�-nn is hecewith �closed. 8idder's Nane � V o-� ��e . � , & Contracts . . , ��s 3M Center Bld . 223-3N S&SS Div. St. Paul, Minnesota 55144 10 � 11 crrY o� �xmc.�r MEMORANDOl�i '�t NASINi M. QURES�iI� CI'1'Y MANAGIIt i�'!: SID II�,i�� DIItDCl�t OF' �L SIINICES ��. �B.7D(.T: IAID[)SIItIAL D�,vIIiOPl�3�'P BL1� I1ATE: JDI� 14, 1984 Attached are resolutions calling for public hearings for two L�dustrial Development Revenue Bonds to be held on July 16, 1984. 2l�e resolutions represent requests by Marf iel�d Belgarde & Yaf fe C,omp�nies for two separate Industrial Development issues for the property located south af Interstate 694 and to the east of East River Road, generally referred to as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park area. The first request is for approximately a ].20,000 square foot hightech office/servioe building in the amount qf 56,000,000. This is referred to as the River Road Investors Project. Z�e second request is for approximately a 150,000 square foot hightech offioe/serviae building in the amount of $7,500,000. 7tl�►is project is referred to as the North Freeway Investors Project. �e Co�cil has received, in their packet, information from the cievelog�ent oompanies about both projects which I believe thoroughly descri.bes the proposals. A n�nber af things I want to point out to the Council regarding �hese projects are as follows. The Federal Government has not �iecic3ed on haw they are going to approach Industrial Development Bond Financing. If the Federal Gaverr�t decides not to put, caps an Industrial Developnent Bond Financing, then the City would have the flexibility of approving these projects. If the Federal Gwerrnient does require an allocated amount, the Council will be xequired to set priorties for the issuanoe af Industrial Develognent Aonds based on its criteria for development. In the past, the City's enphasis for allowing IR'B's has been in the follvwing areas: i. Zb expansion of existing industrial/aorranercial businesses in the City. 2. Zb businesses locating in ore of tiie develognent clistricts. �. To businesses which are noncompetitive with exf sting City businesses. �. Last to speculative buildings. 11 c� � _z— �or� ia, i9ea na�sau�, nEVaA�rrr ea�s h�ith that in mind, it should n�ot within any current tax speculative buildings. be pointed out, that these projects are increment financing area and are , ,- ]'n order to ensure that the Council has full options in determining �i� �ay they will go with Lx7ustrial Developnent Bond Financing, we have agreed with the developer that if the Council chooses to i.ssue the preliminary resolution on July 16, 1984, that resolution will oontain language allvwing the City Council to change its mind and not authorize the issuance of these bonds. Theref ore, by awarding the preliminary resolution, it does not guarantee to the developers that they will be allowed to have Industrial Developnent Ewnds. ZY►ey have been made fully aware of this' and are willing to t;ake their chances and have requested a p�lic hearing. With this in mind, I mn placing the resolutions on the J�e 18, 1984 pgenda for the City Co�cil's review and discussion. :�:I : sh 4/0/4/25 ..� RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 BND,/f r idnor thl RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE AND FINANCE AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (NORTH FREEWAY INVESTORS) �: � WFiEREAS, North Freeway Investors (the "Company"), has presented the City Council (the "Council") of tae City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "City"), with information concerning a pxoposed project (the "Project") within the City; and WHEREAS, the Company has reques�ed that the Cicy issLe its commercial or industrial deve�opment revenue �bligacions undpr Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, to provide financing to �he Company for the Project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Fridley City Coun- ciI as follows: 1. This Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project, as described in the Notice of Public Searing attached to and made a part of r.his resolution (the "Notice"). 2. The City Clerk-Treasurer is hereby authorized to cause the Notice or a notice in substantially the same form thereof to be published in the City's official newspaper and in �a newspaper of general circulation in the City not more than 30 nor less than 15 days prior to the date of the pub- lic hearing specified in the Notice. 3. The City Clerk-Treasurer shall file in his or her off:ice, and there make available for public inspection fol- low:ing the publication of the Notice, a draft copy of the app:lication for approval of the Project, including all re- quixed attachments and exhibits thereto, proposed to be made to khe Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority. 4. The adoption of this resolution by the Council does not constitute a guarantee or firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Company or that the City will take any further actions beyond the public hearing provided in this resolution. The City retains the zight in 3ts sole discretion and for any reason to withdraw from fur�her participation and accordingly not issue the Bonds. pASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7NE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY I�F , 1984. WILLIAtt J. NEE - FIAYOR ATTE�T: SIDNEY C. I��MA�� - CITY CLERK 11 B 11 C Notice of Public Hearing Commercial Development Revenue Bonds City of Fridley, Minnesota Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be conducted by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minne- sota, at the City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, at a meeting of the City Council to be held on July 16, 1984, commencing at 7:30 p.m., C.D.T. At the public hearing the Council will consider a proposal that the City assist the financing of a cocr,mercial or industr:a: development project by issuing its bends or other obliga- tions pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474. The proposed project consists of acquisition of land and the construction thereon of two single story office build- ings and related service facilities, including one building of approximately 90,000 square feet and one building of approximately 60,000 square feet (the "Project"), to be located within the City immediately south of Interstate 694 and east of East River Road, in an area generally known as Hurlington Northern Industrial Center, by North Freeway � Investors (the "Company"). It is proposed that the City assist financing the Project from the proceeds of an issue of the City's commercial or industrial development obliga- tions in an amount presently estimated not to exceed $7,500,000. If issued, such obligations would be payable fro:m lease payments or loan repayments to be made or secured by the Company. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Minne- sota Energy and Economic Development Authority for approval of the Project is available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer. All persons appearing at the public hearing will be given an opportunity to present their oral or written com- ments on the proposal that the City undertake and finance the Project. � CIT`t CLERK SIDIVEY C. INNAN BND-fzidriver RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 RESOLOTION CALLING A PIIBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE AND FINANCE AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RIVER ROAD I��VESTORS) `'�� \ WHEREAS, River Road Investors (the "Company"), has pre- sented the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Fri.dley, Minnesota (the "City"), with information concerning a proposed project (the "Project") within the City; and WFiEREAS, the Company has requested that the City issue its commercial or industrial development revenue obligations under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, to provide financing to the Company for the Project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Fridley City Council as follows: 1. This Council will conduct a public hearing on the pr�posal to undeztake and finance the Project, as described in the Notice of Public Aearing attached to and made a part of this resolution (the "Notice"). Z. The City Clerk-Treasurer is hereby authorized to cause the Notice or a notice in substantially the same form thereof to be published in the City's official newspaper and in a newspaper of general circulation in the �ity not more than 30 nor less than 15 days prior to the date of the public hearing specified in the Notice. 3. The City Clerk-Treasurer shall file in his or her office, and there make available for public inspection fol- lowing the publication of the Notice, a draft copy of the ap�plication for approval of the Project, including all re- quired attachments and exhibits thereto, proposed to be made tc� the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority. 4. The adoption of this reso�ution by the Council does nc�t cons�itute a gua�antee oz firm commitment that the City wi.11 issue the Bonds as requested by the Company or that the Ci.ty will take ar.y further actions beyond the public hearing provided in this resolution. The City retains the right in i�s sole discretion and for any reason to withdtaw from further participation and accordingly not issue the Bonds. PASSED AND ADOPTED 8Y THE C17Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR A1'TEST: Si . �-CI L K M!� �A Notice of Public Hearing Commercial Development Revenue Bonds City of Fridley, Minnesota - Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be conducted by the City Council of the City of Fri�iley, Minne- 'BOta, at the City flall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, at a meeting of the City Council to be held on July 16, 1984, commencing at 7:30 P.M.. C.D.T. At the public hearing the Council will consider a proposal that the City assist the financing �f a commercial or industrial de�►elopment project by issuing its bonds or other obliga- tians pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474. The proposed project consists of acquisition of land and the construction thereon of two single story office bui.ldings and related service facilities, including one building of approximately 70,000 square feet and one building of approximately 50,000 square feet (the "Proj- ect:"), to be located within the City immediately south of Int:erstate 694 and east of East River Road in an area ger�erally known as Burlington Northern Industrial Center by River Road Investors (the "Company"). It is proposed that th� City assist financing the Project from the proceeds of an issue of the City's commercial or industrial development obligations in an amount pzesently estimated not to exceed $6,�000,000. If issued, such obligations would be payable frnm lease payments or loan repayments to be made or secured by the Company. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Minne- sora Energy and Economic Development Authority for approval of the Project is available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer. Al1 persons appearing at the public hearing will be giuen an opportunity to present their oral or written com- ments on the pzoposal that the City undertake and finance th� Project. SIOP�EY C. INMAN CITY CLERK 13 RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMEN? FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECiS ST. 1983-1 AND ST. 1983-2 SE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as fo11 ows : -.�� 1. The City C1erk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such Purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEt4ENT PROJECTS Si. 1983-1 AND ST. 1983-2 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of tand in accordance with the provisions of law,. and has prepared and f�iled with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate show- ing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Nntice has been duly published as required by law that this Council w��uld meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on tN�e proposed assessment. 3. S�id proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been ' o�en to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an o�portunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modi- fied was and is specially benefited by the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1983-1 RNO ST. 1983-2 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modi- fied by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. i3 a Page 2, RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with t�e changes and alterations herein above made, a�re affirmed, a�opted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk a�d filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 5T. 1983-,1 AND 57. 1983-2 8. The amounts assessed each lot, Qiece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof �ntiert�entaperhannumeen paid at the rate of nine and one-half (92) p 9. Such assessment shall be payable on 66th Avenue in fifteen (15) annual installments and on the balance of the project shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments, payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1985, and con- tinuing until all of said installmeqts shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED ANO ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. MAY4R William J. Nee ATTEST: C TY CLERK Sidney C. Inman 14 RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fr�dley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engi�eers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and fhled with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Nntice has been duly published as required by law that this Council wnuld meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the p�oposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present tiheir objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any i�tem thereof, and no objections have been filed, except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. 7his Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of la�d therein described. 14 A Page x--RESOLUTI4N NO.. - 1984 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with t�e changes and alterations herein above made, a.re affirmed, adopted, a�d confirmed as the proper special assessments �or eacfi of said l�ts, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certi- fied to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall there- upon be and constitute the special assessment for 8. The amounts shall bear paid at the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel �f land interest from the date hereof uRte� �entsper annumbeen rate of nine and one-half (9�) p 9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1985, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each inst�hemCounty Auditorected with taxes collectible during sa�d year by � 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office o�f the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of allnsthe firstdday5of5Januaryninteachmyear,Which will be �ue thereon o PASSE:D AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI7Y Of �RIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. M YOR i iam J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sid�ey C. Inman RF50[�TTION ND. _ - 1984 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMP'ROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF O�STS Z4iERE0F: STREET II�ROVII�Tr PRQTDCT I�D. ST. 1984-1 & 2(ADDII�II7UM #3J � W8II2F�S, Resolution No. 59-1984 adopted on the 7th day of May. 1984, by the City �Council, set the date for hearings on the proposed improvements as specif.icall� noted in the Notioe of Hearing attached thereto for reference as EXhlbktS "A , dfl�r WHERFAS, all of the property awners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these impravenents (as noted in said notice) were given ten (10) c9ays notioe by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) w�eekly publications of the required notioe, and the hearings were held and the property awners heard thereon at the hearings as noted in said notioe: NO�,T, '.t�1II�EE�DRE, BE IT RFSCGVID by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka Co�ty, Minriesota as follaws: l. Z7hat the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 58-19�64 are hereby ordered to be effectec7 and canpletea as soon as reasonably possible, t�wit: Street Improvernents, including grading, stablilized base, hot-mix bit�aninous mat, ooncrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer ;system, and other facilities located as follvws: i:apitol Street Main St. to Hughes Ave. 2. Z�hat the work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more oontracts as may be deened advisable up�n reoeipt of bids. 3. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall, Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shal]. prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such impravenents. PASSED AI�ID ADOPrID BY �iE CITY �fJNCIL OF ZHE CITY OF FRIDLEY R�ILS AAY OF �r 1984. ' ATi�P: SIDNE�Y C. Il�Il'�IAIJ - CITY (I�ERK ?,/8/1.8/18 WILLIAM J. I�E - MAY�R 15 16� g�ION N�. ! - 1984 RFSC�.iTI'ION �ING AND APPROVAL OF' PI,�1NS AND APP4�WIl�]G �11�1NGE O�tDEit #1 FOR SIItF.�,T IMPROVEN�NT �'RQTECT AA. ST. 1984-1 & 2 (AD�IDtJM �3) WHIItE'AS, Resolution No. 59 - 1984 adopted on the 7th day of May� 1984, by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements as specifically noted in the Notioe o� 8earing attached thereto for reference as EXtllb�ltS �A°� �1a� WHEREAS, all of the property owners whose property �s liable to be assessed with the making of these ir�ravenents (as noted in said notioe) w�ere given ten (10) days notioe by mail and published notioe of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notioe, and the hearings were held and the property awners heard thereon at the hearing as noted in said notice: �a WHF�tE�AS, Resolution No. �- 1984 adopted by the City (buncil of the City of Fridley ordered all of these im4xo�venents. IT�1, �IER�ORE, BE IT R�CGVID by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, NLinnesota as follows: 1. Z'hat the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 58-1984 are hereby ordeted to be effected and oanpleted as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit: Street Improvanents, including grading, stablilized base, hot-mix bit�aninous mat, ooncrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer systen and other facilities located as follows: Capitol Street Main St. to Hughes Ave. ZY�at the work irrvolved in said ir�rovements as listed above shall hereinafter be in�clu3ed as part of : S'IItEF,T II�kOVF1��NT PR47DCT ST. 1984-1 & 2(ADDII�IDCTM #3) 2. Rl�e plans and specifi�ations prepared by the Public Works Director for such improvements and each of them pursuant to the Council resolutions here�ofore adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attarhed and made a part thereo�, are hereby approved and shall be f iled with the C3.ty Qerk. page 2— Resolution No. _— 1984 PASS�D AI�ID ADOPTID BY �iE QTY �IJNCII� OF �iE CITY OF FRIDI,�'Y �iIS OAY OF _, 1984. �'I'ESP: SID�T��' C. II�II'7AN - CITY C3.ERFC 7/8/18/20 0 .� � WIIrS.IAM J. 1�E - MAYOR 16 � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division CI7Y OF FRIDLEY Fridley, Minnesota June 14, 1984 NDH, Incorporated 700 Industry Avenue Northwest Anoka, Minneosta 55303 ., : Sub,ject: Chan9e Order 1, Street Improvement Projett St. 1984 - 1 b� 2 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract for Street Improvement Project St. 1984-1 and 2 by adding the following work: ADDITION Street construction including Class V base and concrete curb and gutter on Lapital Street. Original Contract Price . . . . . $ 449,095.25 Change Order 1(St. 1984 - lb2) .� 40,352.07 REVISED CONTRACT PRICE $ 489,447.32 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director on the 14t1h day of June, 1984. Prepared by Che�ked by John G. lora, .E. Public Works Director 16 B Page Two Letter to: NDH, INC. Cha�ge Order 1, St. 1984 - lb2 June 14, 1984 16 C ;.: App�oved and accepted this day of , 1984 by NDH, Inc. NDH, Incorporated By Wi liam B. Miller, Vice President Approved and accepted this day of , 1984 by the City Council of Fridley. Minnesota WILLIAM J. NEE Mayor NASIM M. QURESHI City Manager FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL �� JUNE 18, 198� NAt� Alana M,. Herrmann 8417 Regent Avenue N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 START�IG pps_ ITIpp �S,ALARY Accounting/ =1020.38 Data Input Per Clerk �n� Central Service Department STARTING DATE M• _.- May 29, 198u APPOINTMENTS REPLACES Carol William's Position 17 �I . FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL / JUNE 18, 1984 !lonette Construction Company 2050 White Bear Avenue S�t. Paul, !�1 55109 Final Estimate No. 7 City Center Plaza Project -- ,�. ESTIMATES H � 5,000.00 18 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ENGINEERING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 June 14, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c/a Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fr�dley, Minneosta 55432 Council Members: .: CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Estimate No. 7 for Monette Construction Co., Inc., 2050 White Bear Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55109 for the City Center Plaza Project. Original Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 371,698.00 Change Order N1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 34,650.00 Change Order �Y2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E 2,800.00 Revised Contract Amount . . . . . . . . . . . 9,848.00 Final Construction Cost . . . . . . . . . . . a 343,473.10 AMOUNT DUE FINAL ESTIMATE �Y 7 . . . . . . . . a 5,000.00 We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of the City Cemter Plaza Project and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recomnend that final pa;yment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body, an�� that the one-year contractual maintenance bond comnence on the date listed. Respectfully submitted, JOHN G. FLORA, P.E. Public Works Director JGF:jmo Prepared by: Checked by: 18A CIZY OF � �t �ngineetir9 6�31 university 1►venue, N.E. �i�ey� l�inr�esota SS132 nrte: T0: Itcrac�l�M�� Gity Oo�cil City �verue � li.t. �131 University hidleyr M�irv�esow 55�32 Jun� 13. 1984 18B m . �: Fst. t�to. 7 .Einsl �mp 13. �984 Aet. iMin9.. s"- f+�r Mon�ite Construc:ion Co.. Inc. 2050�'�Ihite Bear Avenue St. P,ul. MN 55109 .� . I sur�tY: Original Contract J�maa�t Contract �dditions - �ange Order Nos. �2 C'o�ttact Deductions - Q�ange Order Nos.�"1 -- Revised Contract An�aa�t Value Carr�letea To Dnte 51J8 TOTAL !►rro�t Retaired (10�) (5�) Less Amo�t Paid Previously J�I�UIJT D[JE THIS i5I'D'IATE :,,37:.by�.l��. = 2,800.00 � �d ��.n n�� : 33� � 848 . 00 _ �r = 343,473.10 :343,473.10 _ -0- - - �338,473.10 S 5,000.00 t'i u'r'T FTC'ATF' �F 7'HE CQ�B arr. I herety oert:ify that the Work performed and the materials supplied to date �der terms of the �ontsact for the reference project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actual value �der the contcact of the amounts shown on this estimate (ar�d the final qua'ntities of the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is j�st and a�rrect and no part of the "Arrrwnt Due ZT�is Estimate" has be� received. . Date � Contractor's Avthorized Repzesentative (Title) ,v. : � • x.. . �� I hereby oerti� �edlto ve pzepar�fd�is estimate unlc3etstheo�ntract for reieer��e oontractor is P3Y� project. CITY OF FRID�..iY � DySF'EC'I�R SY Q�ecked ey: .�. .l� ./ ---- _-� Date � % � — � � Respectfully Sutrnitted, City of Fridley BY , � , . Flora, P.E. rectoz of Public Works 18C � FOR CONCURRENCE 6Y THE CITY COUNCIL _I Type of License: FOOD ESTp6LISH�4ENT Deli Cart: of Fridley 622 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 ITINERA��T� FOOD PERMIT Jaycee N.W. Regional Softball Tournament 5701 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley,Mn. 55432 Joe's Place Pizza Invitational 7441 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Meil Gulsug Mark McCowl Tony Wajda TAXICAB Blue & White Service Berry Mack 2812 University Ave.S.E. Mpls. Mn. 55414 Yellow Taxi Service Wayne Joyce 127 First Ave. N.E. Mpls. Mn. 55413 VENDING Mr1CHINE Rapid Oil Change Consumer Vending 5701 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, I�n. 55432 TEMPORARY ON SALE BEER Fridley Tigers Nockey Boosters 191 - 69th Ave.N.E. Fridley, IMn. 55432 ITINERANT FOOD PERMIT Walter Traczyk Approved By: -- LICENSES , Steven J. Olson '� Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Irispector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director Steven J. Olson Health Inspector James P. Hill Public Safety Director 49er's Da;y Hockey Assoc. Shirley Nevala Steven J. Olson 1476 - 64th Ave. N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fees: $45.00 Asking Fees to be waivered $30.00 $175.00 $15.00 $25.00 Asking Fees to be waivered Asking Fees to be v�a i ver.ed 19 19 A � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- LICENSES � JUI� 18, 1984 _ GENERAL CONTRA�CTOR Ainent Pr�ols Inc. 2239 Ro�osevelt imad St. Cloud, I�Bd 56301 Arvid's Carpentry 6711 Qu.incy Street Fridley, 1�] 55432 George B. Johnson Contx. 411 - 7�Dth Avenue N.E. BrooklyM Center, MN 55430 Priem G�nstruction Co., Inc. 11935 - 44th Avenue North Plymouth, t�l 55442 HEAT Itd G Marsh Heating & A/C, Inc. 6248 Lakeland Avenue North Brookly�z Park, NII�I 55428 MASO�i RY Acme Concrete 3612 - :LOth Avenue South Minneapc�lis, NQi 55407 itOOF ING All Sea:aons 2717 Ea:at 32nd Street Minneapolis, I�1 55406 SIQ3 ERECTOR Scenic ,Sign Corp. 828 South 5th Street Sauk Ra;pids, MN 56379 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Kloster•-Madsen, Inc. 9425 Sy�zdicate Avenue South Bloanirr�ton, 1�Ri 55420 L. C. Comtracting Inc. 2316 Ce.ntral Avenue N.E. Minneap��lis, I�IlV 55418 J.A. Me�kveld & Associates Inc. 1299 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, l�i 55432 By: R�bert Atnent By: Arvid Krogsven By: George B. Johnson By: Jesse Priem By: Larry Marsh By: Clint�on Enqstrom By: Robert Shuller By: Robert Gruber Jr. By: �mas Lendt By: Leeland �oaker By: Jack Menkveld �.. APPROVED BY OARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. WILLIAM SANDIN Plbg.-Htg. Insp. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Hldg. Ofc. DARFiEL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CiARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. � 19 B _ FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CtTY COUNCIL -- LI C E N S E S June 18, 1984 RESIDEWTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY OWNER LOCATION OF BLOG. Stuart W. Anderson 539 Glencoe Street 1322 42� Ave. NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Joseph A. & Bonnie M. 1361 Meadowmoor Drive Teague Rt. 4, Bo�x 192 Cambridge, MN 55008 79th Way Properties 321 79th Way Partnership 1315 Rice Crk. Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 UNITS FEE 1 �12.00 :� 1 12.00 8 49.00 APPROVED BY Steven J. Olson, Environ,Ofcr. �� i� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- CLAIMS CLAIP► Nl:(�.EERS 157J02 - 167;18 20