The URL can be used to link to this page

07/02/1984 - 5210OFFICIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING JULY 2, 1984 r � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: o? / p � NAME ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER ___� __________________________________________________________�__________________-______=====j ✓' , rc � � . sf �f� I � l J "� _. � r ,1,� L. � S % � �J � � � � �;�,:,., � ,��Y� � �.. � �� iJ� v;��v �- �� 1 . ., � r"l" `' },. � y � f � ' • ��, .. � i.� r ;,�'": `" �� r .�` ,°° g� �'%` � �" l %C r� a,fi� '� ! .. 'c...r ' ~ � e . �"' � � , ��` _ C�.. � r�•�.r i ' r � i . '`.�. � f �//�/ /� ��' ( � . � �J( ._� , ,� � ) I � ' e1(/ \ �� ;l. 1 ..; W -� .R ✓ ti,.1 �•�, ..! •' � `% I ' . \ � , LL. �i. , � h 1.1 n ( t!^ � e -.s+ i ?,* f � � , ( ('/' "'�'l, �`��' � / f ��/ d�G ��,/ S S�t3 / L'! -t r( r �'� �. n. i ( / / '71�G� l� � fi � % _ �1/► r, � t.l, �� / fi �� a � .�� r � � �i ` r �, . , � � i;�.c.r�j't rd=�+�, tc_'1 � i� �� Nr.. �l�p�� ..� . �'��.yle"'Y�•��'. =--�--�. - . �-°. i� _� � ,� � � � �, �`�,�,�-�.� �� % :, , � ,; � % %% < �� , ,�t . 7,�� ,� �� , � (? ��.^) �/�I , ,� /I � � � �-�lii : -//� �'_. // j f "� Council Meeting, July 2, 1984 Page 2 �UBLIC HEARINGS (Coatinued) Continued Public Hearing on Assessment for Street Improvement Project ST. 1983-4 (From 6/18/84). . . . . . . . 3 Hearing opened at 8:06 P.M. Closed at 8:07 P.M �LO ACTION NEEDED: (See item No. 7) Public Hearing on Consideration of Final Plat, P.S. �8�-04, PZaza Center Addition, by Housing and Rede- velopment Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 D Hearing opened at 8:07 P.M. Closed at 8:08 P.M. PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Item Placed on July 16 Agenda Public Hearing on Disposal of Excess City Property ..... 5- 5 I Hearing opened at 8:08 P.M. Closed at 8:12 P.M. �UBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Item Placed on July 16 Agenda Couneil Meeting, July 2,�1984 • � , Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Assessment for Street Improvement Project ST 1983-1 � 2(Tabled 6/18/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution No. 73-1g8�1 adopted CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeding as authorized by City Couneil Page 3 . . . . 6 - 6 A Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Assessment for Street Improvement Project ST 1983-4 (Tabled 6/18/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution No. 7u-1984 adopted CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Proceeding as authorized by City Council Consideration of a Resolution Ordering Improvement and Final Plans and Specifications and Estimates and Costs Thereof on Street Improvement Projeet ST 1984-1 & 2 ',(Addendum �3) (Tabled 6/18/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution No. 75-1984 adopted �ITBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeding with ordering plans as authorized Consideration of a Resolution Ordering Improvement and Approval of Plans and Approving Change Order No. 1 for Street Improvement Project ST 198�-1 � 2(Addendum �3) (Tabled 6/18/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution No. 76-1984 adopted PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeding with Construction n 7 - 7 A 8 � 8 D 9 - 9 C Council Meeting, July 2, 1g84 �`1�i�f:I�� Page 4 Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code by Making a Change in Zoning Districts, ZOA #84-02, DeGardner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A PUBLIC YORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Item Tabled until petitioner requests it be brought back to Couneil. Adjoining Property Owners Will be Notified When Item is Returned to Couneil. Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of dune 20, 1984. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 EE A. Consideration of a Request for Special Use Permit, #84-11 to Allow Construction of a Second Aecessory Building, at 298 Ely St. NE� by Cheryl A. Michurski .......................................... 11 - 11A �lannina Commission Recommendation: Approval & 11E- 11G with stipulation Council Action Needed: Consideration of Reeommendation Special Use Permit Approved with stipulation PUBLIC WORKS--ACTIOH TAKEN: Applicant Informed of Couneil approval with stipulation B. Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of June 12, 1984 B-1. Varianee Requests to Inerease size of Free Sign and to Reduce the Required Setback, at 6485 East River Road N.E., by Rhoda M. Sprang .................. 11H - 11K AD�eals Commission Recommendation: Denial d� 11R - 11T Council Action Needed: Consideration of Recommendation Varianee denied by a 3 to 2 vote PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAgEN: Applicant Iaformed of Council denial Council Meeting, July 2, 198� NEW BUSINESS (Continued) (Planning Commission Minutes Continued) Page 5 B-2. Variance Requests to Reduce Rear Yard Setbaek and Reduce Front Yard Setback and to allow Detached Accessory Building to be changed, at 953 Mississippi St. NE, by John W. Hitchcock......... 11K - 110 A�Deals Commission Recommendation: Denial and Lot Split Request, L.S.�84-05, by John Hitcheock (From Planning Commission Meeting of June 6, 1984)... 11U - 11EE Plannina Commission RecommendatiQn: Approval 'with stipulations Council Aetion Needed: Consideration of Recommendations � Requests withdrawn by petitioner Presentation by Hickok & Assoc. on Moore Lake Project Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Mr. Boyer spoke. Modified plan approved by a 4 to 1 vote POBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Appropriate Parties Informed of Couneil approval Consideration of a Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Moore Lake Restoration Project, Phase II . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13 B Resolution No. 77-1984 adopted by a 4 to 1 vote PUBLIC i�ORRS--ACTION TAKEN: Bids Have Been Advertised as authorized Council Meeting, July 2, 1984 NEW BUSINESS (Continued) Consideration of a Resolution Direeting Preparation of Assessment Roll for Storm SeWer Improvement Projeet No. 132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution No. 78-1984 adopted CENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAREN: Proceeding with preparation of Assessment Roll Consideration of a Resolution Direeting Publication of Hearing on Proposed Assessment Roll for Storm Sewer Improvement Projeet No. 132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution No. 79-198A adopted CENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAREN: Proceeding with publication of hearing . . . . Consideration of a Resolution Requesting the County of Anoka to Reduce the Speed Limit on Osborne Road from Monroe Street to Trunk HighWay 47 (University Avenue) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution No. 80-1984 adopted PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Appropriate parties have been informed of Couneil approval. Resolution has been sent to the County and other appropriate government agencies. Receiving Bids and Awarding Contract for 1984 Poliee Garage/Storage Facility (Bids Opened June 26 , 1 984 , 1 1 : 00 a. m. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bids received and contract awarded to low bidder-Monette Construction PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Bidders Informed of Couneil action . Page 6 1� - 14 A 15 - 15 A 16 - 16 A 17 - 17 D Council Meetfng, July 2, 1984 Page 7 `-- _ '-_ • -t� Consideration of Temporary Tent Permit For Bob's Produce Ranch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 A ,PUBLIC HORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Appropriate Party Informed of Council approval of a temporary tent permit Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 B Approved $ENTRAL SEAVICES--ACTION TAREN: Licenses issued Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - 10 F Approved CENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAREN: Estimates paid Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 .�ENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAREN: Claims paid � �Z� I �' �' 1 [ �! i � � � � � � •] � L►� Mary Lou Erickson: Request for Waiver of Special Use Permit Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Letter received. Request denied for waiver of special use permit fee by a 3 to 2 vote PUBI,�C NORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Applicant Informed of Council denial ;� � c • i ■ �► ► � ► � CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 (FRO►� 6/18/84). . . . . . . . 3 , PUBLIC HEARING ON CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT, P,S, #84-04. PLAZA CENTER ADDITION, BY HOUSING AND REDE- VELOPMENTAUTHOR I TY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 D � PUBLIC HEARING ON DISPOSAL OF EXCESS CITY PROPERTY ..... 5- 5 I I 1 : ► CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST 1983-1 8 2(TABLED 6/ 18/84 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET (MPROVEMENT PROJECT ST 1983-4 (TABLED 6/ 18/84 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING (MPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND COSTS THEREOF ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST 1984-1 b 2 (ADDENDU�1 #3) (TABLED 6/18/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 D CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPRdVAL OF PLANS AND APPROVING CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST 1984-1 8 2(ADDENDUM #3) (T��EO 6/18/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 C E ► . : �� CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS, ZOA �t84-02. DEGARDNER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEET I NG OF JUNE 20, 1984, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A� CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, #84-11 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDtNG, AT 298 ELY ST. NE, BY CHERYL A. MICHURSKI.......................................... 11 - 11A PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL & 11E- 11G WITH STIPULATION COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATtON , B. MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JuNE 12. 1984 B-1. VARIANCE REQUESTS TO INCREASE SIZE OF FREE SIGN AND TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACK, AT 6485 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E.. BY RHODA M, SPRANG.� ................ APPEALS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DENIAL $ �OUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION 11 - 11 EE 11H - 11K 11R - 11T ra�E 7 ► . %� • �� (PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CONTINUEDi B-2. VARIANCE REQUESTS TO REDUCE REAR YARD SETBACK AND REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND TO ALLOW DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING TO BE CHANGED. AT 953 M�ss�ss�PP� ST. NE, BY JOHN W. HITCHCOCK......... 11K - 110 APPEALS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DENIAL AND LOT SPLIT RE�UEST, L.S.#84-05. BY �OHN HITCHCOCK (FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF �UNE 6. 1984)... 11U - 11EE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED; CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTATION BY HICKOK 8 ASSOC. ON MOORE LAKE PROJECT STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: MOORE LAKE RESTORATION PROJECT, PHASE II . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13 B 0 ► � i • � � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No . 132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 132� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15 A CONSiDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REQUEST�ING THE COUNTY OF ANOKA TO REDUCE THE SPEED LIMIT ON OSBORNE ROAO FROM MONROE STREET TO TRUNK HIGHWAY 47 (UNIVERSITY AvEtvuE ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 A RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1984 POLICE GARAGE/STORA6E FACILITY (BIDS OPENED JuN E 26 . 1984 , 11: 00 A . M , ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 - 17 D r ► . % • , � CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY TENT PERMIT FOR BOB' S PRODUCE RANCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 A L I cENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 B ESTIMATES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - 10 F CLAI MS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 21 ��I�uIIi1►I[��ll�l►� MARY LOU ERICKSON: REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SPECIAL USE PERMI T FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 _T�1�I�Ii1:1 THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 18, 1984 r � _ � � t. i ( : i �_ _ � _ � r. � � �� • The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Nee at 7: �13 p. m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Couneil and audience in the Pledge oP Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Barnette, Councilman Sehneider Councilman Hamernik and Couneilman Fitzpatriek MEMBERS ABSENT: None i • � � :�' �1 � y � � � •: MOTION by Councilman Sehneider to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. � � � •: MOTION by Couneilman Barnette to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. :��• �� 7=� Mayor Nee requested the following item be added to the agenda: . Consideration of a variance request for test points on the cable system. MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � ► � ; 1 ��;�# Mayor Nee read a letter received from John Gargaro expressing his thanks to the City ataPf and Council for their help and cooperation for the 49er Days Celebration. MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to receive the letter from John Gargaro. Seconded by Couneilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee stated the 119er organization worked very hard and put together a very successful event, and also thanked the staff for their support in this event. �1� Y__ � • 1+ •: PUBL•IG HEARTNGS: 1. PUBLIC ucnvTUr_ nu ece�ccMFNT FnR �TRFF.T ?MPR�VEMENT PROJECT ST. 198�-1: LA{\i�\ MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the publie hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. and the public hearing opened at 7:b8 p.m. Mr. Inman, City Clerk, stated a memo was sent to the City Manager regarding notification to the residents and he would, therefore, recommend the hearing be kept open until the July 2 Council meeting. Mr. Inman stated the assessments cover street improvement projects ST 1983-1 and ST 1983-2• He stated ST 1983-2 is for the improvement of 5�h Street for a total cost of $138,118•03 which is a state-aid street and State Aid Funds were used for this improvement. Mr. Inman stated street improvement project ST 1983-1 covered the b4th Avenue relocation at a cost of �41,521.30; the Center City Plaza construetion and landscaping at a cost of $331,992.87; and construetion of the parking lot at a cost of �150,529.53• He stated the cost of these improvements will be assessed to the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Mr. Inman further stated the improvement of 66th Avenue taas included in this project and will be assessed at the front foot rate of $�1.12 per foot and the side yard at a rate of $2.94 per foot. Mr. Inman stated the office building and landseaping portion of the Center City work eost �62,209.60 and would be assessed to the owner of the building. The landscaping for the medical elinic of $1,473 would be assessed to the owner of the medical clinfc. Mr. Inman stated, in conjunetion with the improvement of 66th Avenue, the property owner at 6581 Central Avenue had a water tap installed and is asking that this cost be deferred until sueh time as the lot is split. Mr. Curt Loschy, 1399 66th Avenue, questioned if the property owners would be paying acumulated interest on this improvement sinee it was eompleted a year ago and would the interest be defined so it could be reported for tax purposes. Mr. Inman stated he wouldn't be paying acumulated interest because this improvement wasn't assessed last year. The interest Wouldn't show on the records, however, this figure can be given to Mr. Loschy if he calls the Ci ty. Mr. Curt Barsness, 6581 Central Avenue, stated his property really fronts on Central Avenue, however, he is being assessed as fronting on 66th Avenue. -2- �I� � � � 1)� •: Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, explained the City's assessment policy and if the Council decides to assess this as side yard, the affected property owners doWn the street would have to be aotified. Mayor Nee asked if the owners to the south eould be assessed sinee they weren't notified when this projeet was proposed. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he didn't think this could be done. Mr. Qureshi� City Manager, stated staff would check into this question further. Mr. Bob Burdick, 1316 66th Avenue, stated he would agree with mr. Barsness. jos next door neighbor, regarding the method in whieh he was assessed. He stated he felt the distribution of this assessment was aot equitable in Mr. Barsness' ease. No other persons spoke regarding this assessment for the street improvement projeet. MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to continue the public hearing to July 2, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at $:05 p.m. � ' i_ � �� + 1 '►• � 'i• ' ��'� MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the publie hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously and the publie hearing opened at 8:05 p.m. Mr. Inman, City Clerk, stated this improvement covers sidewalks on the south side of Osborne Road at a total cost of $13,563•�1 to be assessed at the _ rate of $10.93 Per foot. Mr. Inman asked that this hearing be continued to July 2, 1984. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to continue this public hearing to July 2, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �. l • i 'i� l '�� _ •� �11 1 � � i MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatriek to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:06 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated a petition r�as received from eight of the twelve residents on Capitol Street for street improvements. -3- 1%4 tt 1 � �\ �•L� Mr. Flora stated the estimated cost for this improvement is $39•85 a foot for front and $7.52 a foot for the side yard. Councilman Fitzpatrick questioned whether the property at 5180 Capitol would pay a front yard assessment if they already paid a front foot assessment for Hughes Avenue. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated staff would eheck to see if a front foot assessment was paid on Hughes Avenue. Mr. Don Breza, 5221 Capitol Street, questioned the storm water run-off and the plans to improve this problem. Mr. Flora atated the road will be raised slightly with a crown in the center and with installation of the curb and gutter, this would be used to carry Water to the catch basins. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated the problem Mr. Breza refers to is the water that comes off Main Street and runs down Capitol and is one of the reasons why Capitol Street hasn't been improved before his time. Mr. Qureshi stated the road would be erowned and xater should drain into the storm system. He stated it is hoped the water from a heavy rain would drain in several hours. Mr. Patrick Brown, 52�14 Capitol Street, stated their street is considerably lower than Main Street and, therefore, they receive Water run-off from the businesses on Main Street. Mr. Flora stated by putting in the curb and gutter and crown, this should substantially reduce the amount of water run-off from Main Street. Mr. Qureshi stated the improvement wouldn't solve the problem completely because the system isn't designed to handle all of the water. Mr. Harold Stevens, 5228 Capitol Street, stated if the drainage can't be fixed, he didn't feel they should spend money to f ix something only half way. He stated in order to hold the water in the street, a two foot curb would be needed. Mr. Stevens stated when they have a heavy rain, he has a lake in front of his home. Mr. Glen Harstad, 5212 Capitol Street, stated he took around the petition for the improvement of Capitol Street and asked if the estimated figures given for the improvement could be lower. Mr. Qureshi stated bids could come in lower, but they can't guarantee it. Mr. Stevens questioned how much footage he Would be assessed for and what it Would eost him. Mr. Inman stated he would be assessed for 101 front feet and 46 feet for side yard. � Mr. Stevens stated 75 feet doesn't belong to him. Mr. Inman stated he would -4- �1� ti. � • �+ '' have to check into this further sinee this is a pie-shaped lot to determine if there are any outlots. Mr. Harstad asked if the County could be brought in to evaluate Main Street so Capitol Street doesn't receive the water run-off. Couneilman Fitzpatriek stated several years ago the County came in and did exactly What Mr. Harstad is requesting. He stated he felt it has improved the situation, but a lot of water still remains on the street even with a small amount of rain. Mr. Harstad asked What aetion would be taken regarding this improvement. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated the purpose of the public hearing is to determine if the people on Capitol Street wish this improvement. He stated there was a petition with eight of twelve residents signing for the improvement, however this isn't what he is hearing now. Mr. Qureshi stated if the Council Wishes to proceed with the improvement, it could be ordered and the City woulfl prepare plans and the project could be added to the existing street improvement projects for 1984. Mr. Harstad stated he felt at least 12 persons want the improvement, if it is done correctly. Mayor Nee stated the storm sewer has a certain capacity and not much could be done about this situation. Mr. Flora stated it is planned to put install valley gutters on Main Street and it is hoped, with the curb and gutter, this Will help keep some of the Water off Capitol Street. Mr. Brown stated even though they are coneerned about the water, they still _ support the petition for the improvement. Mr. Don Breza, 5221 Capitol Street, stated she didn't sign the petition, but it doesn't mean she is not in favor of the street improvement. She questioned why the street couldn't be improved without curbing as she felt this would only add to water in the street and without the curbing, the water runs into the park area. Mayor Nee stated it has been the City's experience that curbing helps to contain the water. Mrs. Breza asked if more catch basins would be installed. Mr. Flora stated the purpose of the catch basins are to colleet water from the street and divert it into the storm system. Mayor Nee stated the problem really isn't the lack of cateh basins, but the piping for diverting the Water into the storm system. Mr. Qureshi stated if it would help to put in more catch basins, this could -5- � � r � � U� '�L�] eertainly be ehecked into further. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatriek to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councillman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:45 p.m. �}. PnAT.Tr HEARING, ZOA �84-02, TO REZONE LOTS BETWEEN ASHTON AND EAST RIVER ROA� FROM R-1 TO R-�. BY ROBERT DeGARDNER: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the publie hearing. Seconded by Couneilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the publie hearing opened at 8:�16 p.m. Mr. Flora, Publie Works Direetor, stated this is a request to rezone property from R-1 to R-3 between Ashton and East River Road on 61st and 61-1/2 Way N.E. Mr. Flora stated the petitioner plans to construet 13 four-plex units with each unit being a little over 600 square feet. He stated what is proposed is the loft home coneept which would cater to single persons and couples. Mr. Flora stated the Planning commission reviewed this rezoning request and was concerned about the density in this area, and the plan was not a f amily development and that the development didn't f it in with the neighborhood, and recommended denial. Mr. De Gardener, the petitioner, stated he has a similar development in Coon Rapids and 80 to 90$ of the persons buying these lof t homes are single or couples, therefore, he didntt feel this Would add to the density. Mr. DeGardner stated he felt this site was ideal because it would be a buffer between single family homes and industrial, and felt the location was appropriate for multiple units. A drawing Was presented whieh outlined the location of the proposed 13 four-plex units. Mr. DeGardner stated these are deluxe units with patios, oak woodwork, air conditioning, and all appliances and affordable at �39,900. Mr. DeGardner stated if they obtain VA financing, not over 5� of the units can be sold to investors. Mayor Nee asked Mr. DeGardner if he would be interested in just constructing the portion south of 61 1/2 Way, and if garages would be worked into the plan. Mr. DeGardner stated he wouldn't have any objection to doing only a portion of what was proposed and garages would be provided at an additional cost of �3,500 per unit. Mr. DeGardner stated Mr. Nielson, the owner of the property, had visited with most of the people in the neighborhood and had favorable response and didn't realize they would have any problem at all with the reside nts -6- �1� ti + � �+ �' opposing this development. Mr. Soj, 65 61-1/2 Way, stated Mr. Nielson talked to him about this development and he Went to see the one in Coon Rapids. He stated he didn't realize they would be 28 to 29 feet high which Would block sunlight and air from his home. He stated he felt this development would also create a traffic problem on Ashton. He stated the driveways would be across the street from his home and garage. Mr. Roger Berkholz, 6103 East River Road, stated the living room and bedroom face 61-1/2 Way and the garages for this development would be across from the living and bedroom area of his home. He stated he felt single family homes should be put in this area. Mr. Ed Ksolihowski, 35 62nd Way, stated there are new homes across the railroad tracks from him and felt single family homes should be built on this property. . Mr. DeGardner stated this project �ould ereate a a2,000,000 tax base for Fridley and the school district. He pointed out a lot of cities are buying industrial buildings and selling them to developers for $1.00 in order to ereate a tax base. Mr. Larry Mewhorter, 39 because of the density. have to be widened. He street from his home. 62nd Way, stated he was opposed to the rezoning He stated if this development goes in, Ashton Would stated he didn't want this development across the Mrs. Betty Berkholz, 6103 East River Road, stated she Was coneerned about the children. She felt Where there are single people living, they probably are going to have parties and didn't like the element of persons who would be moving into these homes. She stated she was in favor of single family ' homes to enhance the neighborhood sinee it is now a quiet neighborhood. Mr. Mewhorter stated the Planning Commission stated Fridley has more than enough low income housing and understands these would be considered loW ineome housing. Mr. Nielson, 71�14 Riverview Terrace, stated these wouldn't be eonsidered low income because you would need to make at least $18,000 in order to qualify. He stated, as far as the noise, there would be an association and he didn't feel they would want this either. Couneilman Fitzpatriek stated this is an area that simply hasn't developed over all these years it has been zoned R-1. He stated it seems some kind of buffer is ultimately going to happen rather than aingle family dWellings. Mr. DeGardner stated he has been developing land for 20 years and there is a real demand for single family lots. He stated this area isn't a decent area for single family homes and if it ever developed for single family units, it -7- 5. � , ,� , � IJ, : ' : probably would be loW ineome housing. He stated right now this is the best market to sell lots for single family homes and if the land Was marketable Por this use, he would build them. Mr. Nielson stated he has talked to several realtors regarding this property and none of them wanted to get involved with single family homes in this area. Mr. Berkholz stated When East River Road was widened, all kinds of fill was hauled into this property including trees, stumps, oil and grease, etc. He felt they would have problems building considering What has been used for fill. No other persons in the audienee spoke regarding this rezoning request. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatriek to elose the publie hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:30 p.m. , i � �� . r i � � i MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Couneilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:31 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated a request was received f rom Northtown Cable Television to raise their basie service rates from $7.50 to $10.00 and raise their additional outlet rate from $1.50 to $3.00. He stated the franchise requires the cable operator to submit any request for rate increases to the Council. Mr. Chris Wegemer, Manager of Storer Cable, stated $500,000 was recently . spent to upgrade the system. He stated they face a loss this year and it is for this reason they are requesting the rate inerease. He stated most persons are paying $5.00 for additional outlets and they have requested an increase to $3.00. Mr. Jim Erickson, legal consel representing Storer, stated they have submitted documents to sustantiate this rate inerease. He stated there hasn't been a rate inerease in Fridley sinee 1978 and the inerease will bring the basie service in line With other cities in the Twin Cities area. He stated this inerease still doesn't bring the system to a prof itable situation. Mayor Nee stated he was interested in having this processed through the Cable Television Commission. Ms. Barbara Hughes, Chairman of the Cable Commission, stated the Commission Would meet on Thursday and would review this request and forward their recommendation to the Council. � •1� ti. � � �� '% Ms. Hughes stated they are aWare that Bloamington and St. Louis Park independently contracted for an evaluation of the rate requests and teehnical update. She felt it would be possible for Fridley's Cable Commission to revieW these results. Couneilman Schneider stated his concern was availability of service after normal Working hours. Mr. Wegemer stated they are taking steps to remedy this situation. He stated the answering service tries to determine if there is an immediate emergency or only an inconvenienee and aets aecordingly. He stated, aecording to the franehise, their company must respond to these requests for service Within 24 hours. Mr. Wegemer stated they have started a rotation of work with their teehnicians to help alleviate these problems and are also considering going With an in-house answering service. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed rate inerease. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to refer this quesiton of the proposed rate inerease. MOTION by Councilman Sehneider to refer this quesiton of the proposed rate increase to the Cable Television Commission for their recommendation and to continue the publie hearing until a report is received from the Commission. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS• 6. S�QNSTDERATTON OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP �84-07� FOR AN ADDITION AT 6875 UNIVERSITY AVENUE � BY WOODCREST CHURCH (TABLED 6/4/84): Couneilman Hamernik stated several meetings were held with the residents of the area and representatives of the church attended by Mayor Nee, Councilman Barnette, and himself. He stated both sides made some concessions and he felt they came to an agreement acceptable to all parties involved. Mr. Dave Radabough, Chairman of the Building Committee, submitted a drawing showing the existing ehurch and the proposed addition of a multi-purpose building on the south side to support the school and church programs. He stated the original building proposed was 136 x 81 feet and 30 feet from the property line With parking in front and a small apartment to house missionaries when they come to visit. He stated this proposed building received a lot of negative vfbrations from the neighborhood. He stated their proposal now is to reduce the size of the building so it Would be 128 x 72 feet and to double the distance from the property line from 30 to 60 feet. -9- � Jl Y 1 � I�{ � i He stated they Kould be eliminating the permanent stage and will use a portable type stage when needed. Mr. Radabough stated the parking lot Was reduced by two stalls because the building �as moved farther from the east property line. Mr. Radabough also presented a model of the new structure and atated it was his understanding the residents find this proposal reasonable. Mr. Dean Eberhard, 436 Rice Creek Boulevard, stated when plans were f irst presented the general opinion of the neighbors was they �ere opposed to building the structure and had several concerns regarding traffie, safety faetors, market value of their homes, and the aesthetics of the building. He stated the residents have met with the church representatives and some of those coneerns still exist, however, he felt the proposed alternative is aeceptabls With everyone. He stated there are some stipulations they would like noted regarding the landscaping with 5 to 6 feet tall pine trees any lighting installed in back be blocked out from their property, and no struetures be put in the back. He stated the ehurch has agreed to putting shakes or shingles on the roof, rather than a metal roof and to work with residents on how the outside would be finished. He stated the chureh went to a lot of work to make these changes and he appreciated their efforts. Couneilman Hamernik stated they spent a good amount of time diseussing the exterior finish of the building. He asked if the chureh was prepared to make a definate proposal on how it Would be finished. Mr. Radabough stated it would be finished similar to the other building. He stated they would share their plans with the Eberhard�s as they proeeed, and would do their best to work with them on plans for the outside of the building. MOTION by Couneilman Hamernik to concur With the recommendatian of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #84-0? with the following stipulations: (1) that the location of the addition be as proposed which is 60 feet from the lot line to the southeast eorner of the building: (2) any lighting that would be installed on the back of the building Whether it be emergency or other, should be of the nature that it doesn�t infringe on the neighbor�s property line; (3) that the green area behind the building on the east side be maintained as green area with appropriate landscaping; (4) that the roofing be as proposed with a similar type of roofing as on the present sanetuary; (5) that the chureh work with the adjoining neighbors, primarily the Eberhard's, to come to an agreement on the type of wall finish that would be appropriate and work with the staff in applying for the building permit; and (6) that a landscaping plan be presented to staff at the time of applying for the building permit. Seconded by Couneilman Barnette. Councilman Barnette stated democracy is never a lesson in Putility and, through these meetfngs with the residents and church representatives, they 6iI�L' � 1�� r. + � �� ' � came from the point of non-aeceptance to where a proposal Was made that was aceeptable. He stated he felt Mr. Radabough should get credit for really persevering and keeping his eool and the Eberhard's were reasonable and understanding since they were most direetly affected. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAREN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aqe, and Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 7. REGETVINC MINUTES OF PLANNING COI�IISSION OF JUNE 6. 198�1: 7A. SPECTAL• USE PERMIT, SP #84-10, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE 7N CRP-2 ZONING (FLOOR FRINGE). 650 ELY STREET BY MARY ERICKSON: It was announeed that it Was necessary for the petitioner to leave the meeting and she requested this item be tabled until she could be present. Couneilman Fitzpatrick questioned if this was going to be approved, ff staff was aware of any problems. Mr. Flora, Public Works Direetor, stated the petitioner Was present at the Planning Commission meeting and accepted all the stipulations. She had stated she didn't feel the stipulation regarding the eompletion date of September 1, 1984 was necessary as she was ready to begin as soon as the special use permit was approved. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #84-10 with the following stipulations: (1) need to Waterproof to required evaluation of 825.25 feet; this may consist of tWO additional courses of block or the use or Water resistant wood; (2) structure should be securely anehored with anchor bolts; (3) driveway to garage be paved with conerete or asphalt material (�4) garage be completed by September 1, 198�; and (5) petitioner will eliminate the continuing outdoor storage and curbside parking problems. Seconded by Couneilman Hamernik. Mr. Qureshi, City Mana,ger, stated this is property where there has been a long history of outdoor storage of materials and items on the street right-of-way. He stated the City is seeking compliance �ith the ordinances and some of the violations are being pursued through the court system. Mr. Qureshi asked the City Attorney if this aetion Would have a dampening effect on the City's court aetions. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated this action to approve the special use permit shouldn�t have any affeet per se. He stated he didn't know whether the construction of the garage would have a physical impact on the condition of the lot, but hopefully, the material presently outside Would be placed inside this structure. He stated he didn�t feel granting this special use -11- 7B. �1 � r � � jl � •: permit to allow eonstruetion of a garage would affect the court's determination as to whether there was, at the time the aetion t�as started, a violation of the ordinances. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. LOT SPLIT REQUEST L. S. #8�4-OZ,, TO SPLIT LOT 5. BLOCK 4, CITY VIEW AND ADD HALF TO LOT 4 AND HALF TO LOT 6, AT 411 AND u 5 57TH PLACE N.E.. BRANDON CONSTRtJCTION COMPANY: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is a request to split three existing lots into two new lots by splitting the middle lot and taking 20 feet to be added to each of the adjoining lots making two 60 foot residential lots. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split with three stipulations regarding the park fee for $750; the houses are to face 57th Place; and the lot split to be registered with the County prior to issuance of a building permit. Mr. Flora stated the staff Would add the additional stipulation that Khen the lots are registered with the County, they be registered as individual lots and two sites, instead of three sites. Mr. Jaek Dunphy, representing the builder, stated the petitioner is in agreement with the stipulations. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to coneur With the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant lot split, LS #84-07 with the following stipulations: (1) a signed park fee agreement for one Iot of $750; (2) the houses are to face 57th Place; and (3) the lot split to be registered with the County, prior to issuanee of a building permit, and to be registered as two sites instead of three. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Fftzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of June 6, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. RECETVTNG THE MTNUTES OF THE CABLE TELEVISION MEETING OF I�Y 1't,� 1984: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Commission meeting of May 17, 198b. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ��_ � f: �� 1i :, �� '• � �i .._ y MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatrick to coneur With the xecommendation of the Cable Television Commisison and grant the variance petition by Storer Company for a variance of test pof nts in the cable system. Seeonded by -12- 9. • 1�� r. � � � � Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ; � 1 �� i� � �� i, •i •: �. � 'i� � �: � � •' � � � •: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated three bids Were received for the 1984 sealcoating projeet and the low bidder Was Allied Blacktop. He stated this sealcoating Work Kas combined with a Columbia Heights' project in order to receive a more competitive bids, however, New Brighton didn't proceed this year due to the tornado. Mr. Flora stated he Would recommend the bid be awarded to Allied Blacktop in the amount of �59�8�2•35. MOTION by Councilman Sehneider to receive the bids for the 198�1 sealeoating project. CONTRACTOR Allied Blacktop Co. 10503-89th Avenue N. Maple Grove, t�Al 55369 Bituminous Roadways 2825 Cedar Avenue S. Minneapolis, I�IlV 55�107 Midwest Asphalt P.o. Box 338 Hopkins, t�IN 553�+3 BID BOND 5x 5� 5� AMOUNT �85,�+61.75 �95,913•29 �97,325.00 Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to award the bid to the low bidder, Allied Blacktop, in the amount of $59,802.35 for the 198� sealeoating project. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � i � � �� 'i� � •� il �i i' �� i• y �' �4 1 �' 1 � f ' i Mr. Bob Aldrieh, Fire Chief, stated at the time the original proposal Was prepared, it Was thought 3-M Was the only manufacturer of this traffic eontrol system. He stated, however, there is another company marketing optical equipment, PDI, and they and 3-M are currently in a lawsuit. He stated they didn't know how long this would be tied up in eourt and that the systems of PDI and 3-M wouldn't be interchangeable. Mr. Aldrich stated State law provides this equipment could be purchased Without going through the bidding process. He stated only one bid Was -13- � �1� r � � �� • received from 3-M in the amount of �27,941.25 and if the Council wishes to proceed, his recommendation would be to award the bid to 3-M so installation can start on this system. Mr. Aldrich stated the five interesections involved would be at University and Mississippi, East River Road and Mississippi, Highway 65 and Misissippi, 73rd Avenue and University, and 57th Avenue and Universfty. He stated these inersections rank high on the critical list as far as the Police Department and Fire Department are coneerned. MOTION by Couneilman Sehneider to receive the bid for the traffic control system (Opticom). Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contraet to 3-M for the traffic control system (Opticom) based on the testimony this is proprietory equipment. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. RFSOLUTTON NO 71 1984 CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE AND FTNANGE AND TNDUSTRTAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (NORTH FREEWAY INVESTORS): Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated this is a request for issuanee of industrial development revenue bonds f or property loeated south of Interstate 69� and to the east of East River Road, generally referred to as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park area. Mr. Qureshi stated the proposal is by Marfield, Belgarde � Yaffe Companies to build four buildings on this property and they are requesting a public hearing for issuanee of industrial development revenue bonds. He stated they are aware of legislation pending before Congress which may seriously limit the use of these bonds by the City. Mr. Dave Sellergren, legal counsel for the company, introduced the owners and stated the request tonight is for the Council to sehedule a public hearing and indicated they are aware of the pending legislation before Congress. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 71-1984 setting the public hearing on July 16, 198�• Seconded by Couneilman Sehneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. RESOLUTTON NO 72 1984 CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE AND FINANCE AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RIVER ROAD INVESTORS)• Mr. Sellergren, legal counsel for the company, stated the owners are requesting a publie hearing for the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds and involves the same property and the same owners as the North Freeway Investors project. He stated they are requesting the two issues because of the dollar limitations for industrial development revenue -14- �i�� r + � �+ �• bonds. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 72-1984 setting a publie hearing on July 16, 198�• Seconded by Couneilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. �+ � � � � � � � �1 �\� . f�! \ . Y .1 . �l � � � 1 � - 4- � •�� •i •: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this resolution. Seconded by Couneilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. •� �_�: �� t_ � �� , � �'�� '� MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this resolution. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � �� ;� �� ; � �� •� ; � �';� � :�� :� :�� ,�� . ; • ; '+� �-� '+' •: :�� :�� 1M MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to table this resolution to the next meeting. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. . •� I i; �► � i.. � •1 �i�_i � �y'i� _v_� ;11 •• � ;� :�� 'i � 1 � , . T i , � � . 1 � � � { S .}� � f _ \ � 1 _ 1 i\ � i�� -\ � 15t � MOTION by Couneilman Barnette to table this resolution. Seconded by Couneilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. '• � 4� � ��' • MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to coneur with the following appointments by the City Manager: � .E+1.1�ia� Alana Herrmann 8417 Regent Ave. Brooklyn Park, I�Ild 55�443 POSITION Acet./Data Input Clerk - Central Services Dept. -15- STARTING SALARY $1,020.38 per month STARTING DATE May 29, 1984 REPLACES Carol Williams Polition � � ` Y � � 1 � • : David Fraser Police Officer �1,�147.00 July 2, 1984 Thorne 6710 Duck Lk. Rd. Police Dept. per Helgesen�s Eden Prairie, I�IId month Position 553�� Seconded by Couneilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Couneilman Sehneider to approve the estimates as submitted. Monette Construction Company 2050 White Bear Avenue St. Paul, I�IId 55109 Final Estimate No. ? City Center Plaza Project $5,000.00 Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. LICENSES• MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatriek to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. CLAIMS: MOTION by Couneilman Barnette to authorize payment of Claims No. 157J02 through 167518. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. :� � :�1ti.�� MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Couneilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Mee�ing of the Fridley City Council of June 18, 1984 adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Couneil Approved: -16- William J. Nee Mayor � CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COIfNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF NEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1983-1 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 18th day of June, 1984, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon a�'�objections, ��any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-Nit: • STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-1 The proposed assessment ro11 for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. � At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the con- struction of street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, parking lot, related landscape improvements, and other facilities located, as follows: 66th Avenue Northeast 64th Avenue City Hall Parking Lot fridley Plaza Central Avenue to 900 Feet East University Avenue to 5th Street The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements wi11 be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten.(10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATED THIS 4th day of June , 1984, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of fRIDLEY 5 MAYOR W iam J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman Publish: Fridley Sun on May 30, June 6, and June 14, 1984 z 2A � /� ��- �-/c�ti� Ar_� �+�-p %?Ayo� � ��7i /�"��'��'f r 1� . G u�✓CP1 � G�>f� �^ . a � �,�- �►�1 � s s , d �P �� c �� 7 � 1� ��N� 7�F. ,q 55 Essn-��.,f l��Ef/^/ c � ��/7 '7:30 �� fui� � � Tti � H,� �S E�� P�s-s�N� �� .,�P � � -- � � �e gi•��P, �4 ss c s-s �s-r c .� �- .f- v �.. > S-� r' � S� u� c z., � C� � �e b� .Z 6E� ►: �� F/� C 6 s � ��N�•� •�/ f�� . ,�f . �e r E'- b �- � /1? D%�f'��..1 /c�- �� y f��s��e y �� sE I ,�.� �s� �r ��' o F � � �� , � 7 o A,� � -f bt �d�� . �,d 67k i9�%� ,�/D ND � i�i F T� E �'%i �• � t � , h ti� ��,, �� t,,� y ��5 ��; �,�� ' y .� �- ;�,�� E T� � v A l�► E m��y i � f, �� FA �-t' � f f�'FA �e s- � �� E ,e y � Ad� l� ��+11° �''� L��, s'� � �,,� � i' ' /A/�o/f'!c• L� M��c� s,�,, �E�l y. _ _ �-�� !� . 6 � � � ��0;�� T,��'� �'� � 3 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT fOR ST. 1983-4 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City,of Fridley will neet at the City Hall in said City on the 18th day of June, 1984, it 7:34 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon a11 abjections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the con- struction of street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services and other facilities located, as follows: Osborne Road (Sidewalk on South Side): TH No. 65 to Central Ave. ihe area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above �oted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the iands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district•court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. pA?ED 7HIS 4tfi DAY OF June , 1984, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman Publish: Fridley Sun on May 30, June 6, and June 13, 1984 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday, July 2, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Final Plat, P.S. #�84-04, Plaza Center Addition, by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority, being a replat of Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Ree's Addition to Fridley Park, including all vacated street and alleys, and also that part of the West On Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter �f Section 14, T-30, g-24, lying between Lots 2 and 3. said Block 1, and lying northerly of said Block 2, to allow new development in this area to have simple legal descriptions. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: June 13, 1984 June 20. 1984 �l ANNIt�G COMMISSION MEETING 2. ION B LUTHE A/EW FEL �DGEWATE TOLLOf�ING 2. ?. PAGE 5 Y I�Gi. ABA, SELL�NDED 9Y I�D2. OQUIST, TD RECQNl�'A►D TO CITY COUNCIL OF CONSIDERATIQN OF 11 SPECIAL USE PERNIT� SP N8�-08� DY REDEEI�R CHURCH� �PER SECTION 205.07.I� 3� (B) � TD 11iL0i�► ?NE �DDZTIQN OF 11 XALL �ND REJNODELING 1�R THE f1ANDICAPPED� QN I�O�' 2� BLOCK 6, R G�1RD ,�` THE SJII� BEING 61 MISSISSIPPI t�AY N.a. , MIT11 THE STIPULA 5s TflERE BE a!V THE FINTSX OF NE TXE EXISTING BUI LIWASCAPE ?1.�1N. LDINC SHOULD BE C�OI'�11TIBLE I�ITN �ldD IN BARJ�lLYVY WITH THE RESIAENTI1lL CHARACTER OF THE NEI6HB0 . 3. SPECZAL USE PERMIT BE SUBJE APPROVAL OF Tf1E RICE CREEK b►ATERSNED DISTRICT alVD CITY ENGI ING REQUIREXENTS. UPON 11 VDICE VOT£, ALL VOT� 1LYE, CNAIRi10l�lAIV SCN L DE'CI.ARED THE 1�lOTIQN CARRIED LINANINOiISLY. \ Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on Jun . PUBLIC HEARING: COt�SIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT� P,S. �184-04. PLAZA '�ENTER�COD�lION, Y RID1�Y—AaUS1��EDE�l�L��T�'NTN6Ri'f1�: e�ng a replat o�locks�, 2. 3. an 5, Ree A�dition to Frid e Park. including all vacated streets and alleys. and that part of the West half of the Nartheast Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, lying between Lot 2 and 3, Block 1� and lying Northerly of said Block 2. which includes all of the property between University Avenue and 5th Street, South of Mississippi Street. down to. but nat including the Fridley Bank Property. M�'IUti BY MR. RQNDRICK� SECQNDED BY MR. OpUIST, TO O�EN TXE pUBLIC NEARING � P5 84-OI� PLAZA CENTER 1lDDITIAN� 8Y FRIDI.SN HDUSING i REDEVELOPNENT AUTHORITY. VPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VC)TI1VG 11YE, CH11IRi+►OrlAJV SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLSC tIEARING OPEN AT B:IO P.lJ. Mr. Robinson stated this was basically housekeeping for the HRA. The plat Nould take in a11 the property from the northerly property line of the fridley State Bank to Missi5sippi St. and bounded by University Ave. on the west and 5th St. on the east. The new plat allowed for the Fridley Plaza Clinic, future expansion of the clinic. new alignment of the roadway,the plaza. the office building, City Hall. future development of Target, as we11 as future expansion of 7urget, and possible future joint parking arrangements rith iarget. Ms. Gladys Sor un, 411 Mississippi St.. stated she lived across from the fridley Library. She stated this was a very big parking lot to look at, and there wilt be a lot of additional traffic. Ni11 there be any kind of barrier along Mississippi St.? Mr. Robinson stated there wi11 be large trees along Mississtppi St., a bike- way/walkway easement, and then about 20-25 ft. of bermed green space. The parking lot will also be sunk down a little to soften the visual impact of the parking lot from the street and the neighborhood. 4A � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 23 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Saba stated it was his understanding also that there will be an overlap of shifts at Target, so all the traffic will not be coming in and going out of the parking lot at the same tiaie. Ms. Srenda Tibbetts, 421 Mississippi St., stated she r+ould like to express her concern about the traffic on Mississippi. She stated that recently a thild was hit on 5th St. coming out onto Mississippi. She stated that with all this new development. she would like to see some consideration given for the heavy traffic at Mississippi 6 5th St., possibly with a stop sign at Mississippi St. and Sth St. Mr. Saba stated this was a very valid concern� especially with the bikeway/ walkway along the parking lot and children riding their bikes and crossing Mississippi to get to the new conmunity park. Mr. Robinson stated a traffic study is being made of this area. He stated he would bring up this traffic concern so it is taken into consideration as part of the study. . MOTIDN BY MR. XGINDRIQC, SECUNDED 8Y J�ffi. SABA, TD CLOSE THE PUBLIC NEARING ON PS N84-00� PLA2A CENTER 11DDZT?ON, 8Y FRIDLEY HOUSING i REDEVELOP!lENT AUTNORITY. VPON A VOICE YOTE� ALL VD'l7NG AYE, CHAZFadOMAN SCHNABEL DECURED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLCISED AT B:25 P.N. MOTIDN BY MR. XONDRICK, SECG�DED BY �JR. OQUIST, TO RECOlNKEND TO CITY CDUNCIL APPROVAL OF CQINSIDERATION OF 11 PRELIPlINARY ?LAT, P.S. NBO-Od, PLAZA C£NTER 11DDI?'ION� BY FRIDLEY XOUSING i RED£VELOPI�NT JIUTNORITY� B£ZNC � REPLAT OF BIACKS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5, REE'S ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, INCLUDING ALL VACATED STR£ETS AND 11LI�YS � AA►D THAT PART OF THE MEST NALF OF THE NORTHEAST NALf OF TNE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTIAN 10, LYING BETiJEEN LOT 2 AND 3, BLOCK 1, AIVD LYINC NORTHERLY OF SAID BLOCK ?� MHZCH INCLUDES ALL OF THE pROPERTY BETf�EEN VNIVERSITY 11VENUE 1WD STH STREET� SOUTH OF MISSISSIPPI STREET� DON1V T0� BUT NOT INCLUDZNG THE FRIDLiY BA?7K PROPERTY. 11PQN 11 VOICE YOTE, �I.L 1�DTIlVG 1lYE, CiiAIRWQMAN SCKNABEL DECLARED TH£ PlOTION CARRIED UNANI!lOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERt4IT, SP �84-09, BY E. R EN: er ection 05.'f5.1, 3, D. of the Fridley City Code. to a ow a� arage on Lot 1, Block 1, Target Addition. the same _� being 765 53rd Avenu (See Appeals minutes of 5/15 for variance) MOTION BY M2. OpUIST� SEf�NDED BY J�t. CK� � OPEX T1tE PUBI.IC NEAF?ING � eao9, sY rucxu� �.� cx�AV. VPON J1 VDICE VOTF, �LL VDTZIVG JLYE, CHAIRWD�lAli1 SCXNABEL BEARING OPEN AT 8t27 P.M. \ C 4B ` ,. �� ' i i 1 " - . -�.- -s rv-� .-.:_s»-� �- -� I �� v^�:�-� � ��`�� • . � � i�=-_-�- ��— �. �:, �•iS,=: ;�, �� , �� M�"c%� ��`-.�`�~titi � ��.�`s�- :��'y��1;t'°M 1 � �� +�' • ��/'��/"�- _ `=�tiV-� l �.-Ji^-�� •_%-�: ^ ^ . � � �/�Ir�! ti � f� � �� % i ,�l`�li`� : �`� ��,' /`�i%•�� ` � - � i � �%�� r�=- � .� '�� ../"� � �/1 ^�'� ��i w1l ��- ��L � 1V/ � 1\��./��: � �/�/�� _ 1� � N ' � `� , � .�!�iww�' i =�./'`/`�:. � � � r�.., ��.� : N �. ^\ � = ��' a~�',,, J � ; j v1 �^�" v � Z'' �/�� . / � � �v�v ^ `'u� f i \l=. /�/- � / � =i�.�"�.��v��f:i��V�N~`1 '`�� 1.:` �'l �✓� ' i '� ��^��Wi_�li` �-�� l '� �'� .��v�%��3t/�:�M ��S��i �-� % v�=/= f.`� -^ �..1�.'.�v1'��%v� ��;�...�=�� /,��/rf�L-`�.'V\�%�U��%: ��'.� - �=vi�•ti./� .: -c - -'�'=�� % �L'' �� ' � ;'� 1 �1;��-'��i�-v�� • ' • ��j�ti ` :' � ��``'� � . � 1 :/_'�� i : � � - ��'�� J��,'^�.'.��I � � :Vt"' `=`-/'~�.".i.� ��-'.� i j�%�t--l'-^� I /`/1� � �/�./.�. i-• / v � .-. ✓ :: - �v `' y �`� � v �`/'�� ✓ � %�. ^`l�= ^^u.��:��?`�^��._.y�'��- �- �✓ � ✓^ � v � � ✓ �.,/�/� � 'V V�%� �� • � : �C�� ^.� 1. ' ri�� ^ � � ��i. ;,, � � j � ' ��' -�-i� ^ �. � �r� J � I �' ^ N�` :'ti - ��\ ''��` n `.^f' �i 1'. �\.:��^ � � ^=��'1t�'�� f�'�ti�i s �� _ ' �. �=�� '��:%~`i� ^` : �,��`�^�� f 1�� ti_titi �:� Ci�� `�` ^�I �/r ! � : f` ��/-. � ( . 1 ': � : � f .f�, � � �`/� �- f� S;''a"c .../�L V� . ��' �ti�� %��•��. � � .`/' 3 � � N�' � ';-.v � % ' �i. �✓~ ��i. �: - �i��-'i� � i � ' � �� :i � -�,�•-. � � ✓�' � f �'�� .� � 1.� �KIYr `a ' ! r � �� •' � . ' Zn � !� . �• rt► � . .... � .�, �—�,.-�I�E � v � �. � �l Z6o � i � � � � S I ' � �Z� � eR�V� e � � 1 � �� .� /1�' w/ �. Af i �` t : t 1D� OF '� � 1�� i 1. ��'' � - {"' cr. � _ _ : r�� J � � 5:.�8 �V�S . Q � ' �Z� r �..�.: e �1�t�t r� Q(w�3 t 6 _ J.+.er• -1 - �� , i 67 �► 59 �� t � , 4 , �. ` c� oI � ti�' ��`` _'� � + Gt . � � � i ProposQd Fridl¢y P/a�a Center � : �d(' � CI TY OF FQIOL EY . / J ■ 4D � t---- . _ .� MISCl�il00! 6TREET ,w _. -• �A+�sr+d � p%�/ bnC "�� w ' '' � — - � 1 r, � I : w ' .� - i�� . � t ��i � ., i � � .,, : �_,,I .,: w .� y • (� . � q'q�,atd ja�! ' ( � I 2� A�N�i., Optrvl,w� �16 1� i ��, � i � 8' � ' .- � � � � W � N 4 I ,_ � � �.,. � � I i Fi�p;aa w7ly Eoamu�! _ � 1 �---------- � f �,_� Dl'opoud ~_ I-- — b �o,y�� « ' � rM � �c� � Q f � t�.i � Z .; 9 .0 -° -• � (;v'c � - �`N g Ctnitr O .� a[ � � . � ^ � ' v ' !! .r � +1 M g, s Z� ` K � 1M V 4 ' � � � s $ M I� � Cit' � aaaa �t � ;: J ` �� o . � 4 . � t+r � � � �Z � � - sFOU�?M�cs AvE. s �/F. =` R Ar'Pa Bu�ld;r,9 N h � �� ,o ._ � � F cr r, ��: _ � � FOtlQMr64 dvE . A/E • � = .� �. � M I � + 4 •C � � I j � �,;d��, Mrd�co/ Girre s � , � � � ,,, I � � ,. � iK: , 4 ": � I ` . _. _ � . - ..� . --��a � _ _ . � . _ (�� '� � `*+� .� PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of City Ccuncil of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday, July 2, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: The disposal of excess property owned by the City and described as follows: 1. Lot 14, Block 1, Blomberg Estates 2. Lot 15, Block 1, Blomberg Estates 3. Lot 16. Block 1, Blomberg Estates 4. The West 80 feet of the South 150 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 129 5. Lot 1. Block 7, Edgewater Gardens 6. Lot 2, Block 7, Edgewater Gardens 7. Lot 3, Block 6, Edgewater Gardens 8. Lot 11, Block 20, Fridley Park Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above time and place. Publish: June 13, 1984 June 20, 1984 � WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR G •. •�. .i.i� .�_. .. 0 v From sbc 8cst �[ � liASIII QtJRESifl CiT1' YA.'�AGER'S OFi7CE : DISPOSAL OF EXCESS PROPERTY ' SA : �i, �� <••�: � •� . � TO MEMORANDUM �F-235 T:�P� 1 IN This item Mas discussed at the conference meeting of April 30. 1984. The consensus was that we should dispose of the lots in Blomberg Estates, Edgewater Gardens. along with the lot along East River Road and the lot in Flanery Park. Please see that we follow the app�opriate procedure to get the euthorization for proper disposal, and just to avoid any possiDle proDlems, we should go the safest route of calling for sealed publit bids. It is important that we should proceed with the process as soon as possible so we tan get the best possiDle price for these properties because of the co�struction season just starting. Thank you for your assistance. NMQ/ms JF to CM SJ25/84 The City Attorney has reviewed the property documents for the eight lots determined to be excess to our needs. He indicated that properties numbered 1 through 3, if sold. should have those funds identified for Park and Recreation purposes. Distribution of proceeds from parcels 4 through 8 should be determined by a resolution adopted by at least 4 members of the Council. In order to proceed, it �►ould be approprtate for the City Council to set a public hearing at the June 4th meeting for July 2. 1984. P�ior to that meeting the City Assessor could establish a minimum Market Va1ue to obtain for each parcel so that after the public hearing to dispose of excess property. we could go out and obtain bids for their purchase. The attorney will have to prepare new documents for the sale. recording and transfer of the property. 58 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 9 1984 PAGE 18 6. LOT SPLIT RE UEST: L.S. �84-04 BY CYNTHIA J. BRAAM: Split off orth �eet o ot . oc , Spring alley d�tion, ta make w buildin te at 1443 Rice Creek Road. (Petitioner knows proper s land locked.� Mr. inson stated this property was located n of Rice Creek west of Arthur It is a very large lot in exces . 37,000 sq. ft. He stated there is n lan for a road at this time ut there are a couple of road easements tha have been picked up. ff has no problem with this request, but one stipula ' n would be that lot split is recorded at the County. The petitioner, Gary m, ted the lot split was for future development if a road should ever go ough. 1NOTIQN BY lJR. SABA, CadVDED B . KQNDRICK, TO REGIOMMEND Z10 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT S IT REQUEST� L. . N84-04, BY CYNTNIA J. BRAAM, TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTH FEET OF IAT 6� B � SPRING VALLEY ADDITION� TO 1NWCE A NEW BUILDIN ZTE AT 1443 RICE CREEK RQA WITH Ti1E STIPULATIAN Tf1AT TXE LOT SPLIT RECORDED AT TNE COUNTY. �VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CfJAIRWOl�lAN SCH L DECLARED THE MOTIQN ED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. SALE OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES PROCEDURE: Mr. Robinson stated that if the Planning Carmission concurs with the "Sale of Public Properties Procedure", they will be saying that the sale of these R-1 lots is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that they encourage development of R-1 in R-1 areas. He stated these properties are tax forfeit properties, park dedication properti�es, etc. He stated Mr. Moravetz indicated these properties would be turned over to realtors and sold. The Commissioners were concerned with Lot 11, Block 20. Fridley Park, as it was not a buildable tot. MOTION BY XR. PlINTON� SEG�DNDED BY J�t. SVANDA� TO CONCUR WITX THE SALE OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES PROCEDURE WITH THE UNDERST.ANDING THAT IF A LOT IS NOT A BUILDABLE LOT ��'HIS FACT BE PIADE IQVOWN ZN WRITING AT THE TIME OF SALE. UPON A YDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING A.YE� CHAIRb10MAN SCHNABEL DECIARED TNE MOTI�h► CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. - a. RECEIVE APRIL 17, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: lIOT'IO Q2. SDANDA, SECGINDED BY 1�2. K , TO RECEIVE THE APRIZ I7, 1984, �iJ IRV Q IMENT ALITY G1Dl�lMZSSZQN S. Mr. Svanda recalled minutes that he was disappointed th�t Council had apnroved the Haza Wa % rdinance priar to the Enviror►mental Qualtiy Commission's roval. He st� the E.Q.C. should have been consulted prior to this �on as more work needs done on the Ordinance. UP�N A WICE VOTE� 1lLL VOTING AYE, CI�AIRWOMA ABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UlVANII�IOUSLY. s SEC. /2, T. 30, R. 24 C/ T Y OF FR/OLEY 2 � '; .. ON � .J"_��%. � 1 � 1 r�V r � � 4 � MENT �•r ;: . -, . � r ,�r r � 1` \; � --"__ %' e� � • � -- �;, F':'.. ��... . � � . � � . _ i . � W � �Ilrr � � i . a s ;4NA4 �w � � ' ' �' . 'c f i - � .• . t . � � , ,,, ,`.�`.�,t' � ':�:zo •;:..: �.. ,... � . ..... . .• „ Sr: . wstw � COt�NTf i��TE At0 Mt6�tMN�i NQ.� J!L /� ,�� ' t3 ��..i 5C tNS K� tO�V:uT�O�+ C' ffCO+OS �S }Nry aI1(Y IN /N[ �I�IO(� CO{!M► arKCS .nrc�n.c ;�rc .+a y�o,�� n.s c �.w��•c �s �o u usro a.,. rw r/t�tr+;[ �uN'OS[S �r�tD rrM �pyw }f 6 ►�pt �FSiO►r5'tt[ ►� �wr �N �@CYUCHS M[f(�N fO�rt,uwtp �39/2 � A�r �.�� r� �� r � �AKE SPR�N� .«o.,.�. . aic �• ♦� � .' ` . -- -. • -. � 1 � r��: iJJ V^ l :' C} �� • �' � � y'- - L/N LO�M[� J[C It �.rw Ci..i t. IO/IND W. AMDEffON S.� COIMf► fINVIfO� =�.r ��or� [aw•. w�or. ••• r 4. � O.. : � 5D rMrs �s � co.wu+�w rNt► �►MU n+ rNt '/2 SEC. /5. T 30. R. 24 a�K�s.,.�,��„ irnf DI�wMG �S 10 � �t/[�INCI rVf�OfIS n n �+o+ �swas�: K'CUUUrs rRrPr C/TY OF FR/OLEY 535 9� �Nt�q� �rt�t��a �M�K�� '`� . :.�K .. ,. . � :. � • � '��i ;� x . . .. : .. .Z:• .•f..Mw • •S \ �. �.��R W 1�, � '�� :, �1.,�, � � .r.: �� a�s .D� T,�� , � �TM �� STY/MS � ...` . , :. . . � . � � ;�y � :. .�. � . .. � � �t � ... ��- � � �� . � • ?`�� ' ' .R°� : . .. . . . - 37: '. �• �. ./:' , . rr�� h' �,.�� ,� • � f � �/ • � ► R�. ,, " ` � • f �/ ; ,1 � �.�� f v'� . ,._ R � _ .'•.• ..• i �i' �� ✓ � " 4„� 6 �'v� ` � . •. ( i�.�% ' �� 1 � �•., ti,� .. • .•, 9 � �" ��" si .. 9 . -,i ?► . ; .. • l�' . . ---._.. � �nni � .^,.' � _. .� �: \\ �, `\� � � � �, � .,: � - :� i � I. . � � �i 16 . •e •1�� ,� •�/ � .. .�` i.•y-� -. , �'- ..� � Y-��- .� � _ � e � r 7� • ,� � �•� �t ., � �� _ J O \ �- -. �o R� K ' �� :� ' � � �;�•��'•; �_ ; _ ;� p�1�, �o• � � • - • '. �'= � . �� -- a ' 1N � � � �. N • ' . .s d` ; _ 1 �0�%-'� s R *%% ` " • #` . ` ' �' . • . , j �; e - i • � i�' •� � �. ' b � -- �., � � tA��T t!'�t ' :; � ' _ : �� - - — — � �� ' = a . �0;.. • i � � L. '`t � : � � y�f • �'':� :�. '� . �� , . � If � t ,' � y �' �Y • — _ i , '�.•M�SS�• ��T. ' ^.... y . �.: �MSS�SSR�M ,� _ • •T�, �. � ._.;... �-'--1�— "'1 i—t�.rc� �.. � . � . ''I T � p�:. �• Q �.�•a►r ,.. _ , 19 .._,, =:. -^.� i�„ �. .� � . � fOl�MO M� •MD ' COu'+1t Su�v! ro�� ta/�• � � � SEC. �5, T 30, R. 24 irr oF FRiocEr � � `\ ..... .�. —, .. _ 5 E �r�5 �S � COr►�.�rOI+ ty ��:.�� • �.�c. •..c.. ,w ►w •No.. cc ... pqK[� �ntf��w: �M �N� t.'r., ►M�.7��:U��N :,`M•/:� MR�MC( IdMO�:: ��. ��1 l ^�ti n �� ypt �tSrovSN:f �:� �+• r .c:w.c,es �r.� w co•+�.w,� 539/5 i8 � �-� .. : ... .--.-�--- - . ��.� .. �.i• . r.. • �:It ^N' �"'• � ' •I. � �'� �, •• �\ � • •��wi �: _.��...� ` Y( ,�� •I 7. ' ''% , � �/�," . w�'Yr/�+a T/. � 1� � _ y � `}� i • � r �� . // `.�� y c .� : �:._....� � . � i• �0 � _. - — ^ � i . •• �.��. � ��,� tT `� � pNNSON •�•ci �.. � ' W . � , i� ~ .. W . �i �,: ��"�"s�••� , , . ►� .�, 32 � r . _ W • ;� �`, , .. � � �'' � - ER; IA�D � 3� '< � . � ' ' '' '�'r � pD/T10M :��' •� . �p ''�•"' � ` : � , L• L �oo ' _ Rry - , �� ; - — , � � :. ; �_ �...• *• ..;�� _ ,13 � .• . , .13 `N, ..•'"" � ' � o � e - � � «' � " : ,,,p � $YLVAN " N e . �a= .�'"' ;. ` = � -. _-: r � W lk- � flILLS ,V�. " '' �?,6,7 .4 ° , � s %8i •; .. . , P� A „�' �' �'•� p�T(0 �, ;, . �� . .. 3 ' - ~ +, ' SiTEIUTE WME �� 26 r' � � � . � �•�• �,y � . 61 TM . Iw�r � '� : ' _ � a�, � , : .,' :�. :;a � z' , .,. , ; , . r . � �5 .•- � � � . .. � . , . . . . �: • � .�� .. �~ \5,� .1 ..�' ��'�� .�� r >�� • H'� �, •"'. 31 ;�i • ,• �,�' � ` � � .•.-'• � � �� ry��r�s�a�r f� ' ,; . °k � • • . ! � �v� �. ~�Y, " •• ' �. � � �� Sr�v�N � ��NE � � ' . „ � . s� �re `.• . � � . ' _: ; . � s! iR w�r • , S : � : ; . � :.. , . , s i -"' . �Zn�{rf�JPl��•. �i'7y=�' � w • • f � J • � I� i = � j . � � -� _ /. : r. M ¢ � � � � � �_ � �;�fR` � ' `'' �. � : :4 : �. . . . ' 1T � �- s ' ' �.• �....w •rr:aa �� . � / \ � ' s �! ��v . Il[ . ' �- � •, . . :TiMfTr � � K..�'� � , ; . . . � � ' ? . O RO w�Y • , , - . j • .,� � A/�NOR i � � . ,� ; . �� . - _ ..fi .�� .� ^ ; �.,.�:,.,,;, ` �� -• RO '� IdN . i � �. : � . 1. W A •rl►, DEM- ' r k. �y'' ' ' �� • � L3 . . ; Z -�,,• ;:� •: .o w r , is . u JrJ� � _• P ,, - C i � �� S � : � . �� -' . : - a �2 V2 MI�Y � � `�' y�'�� -- �,�� • .. �j� W '... . . , . , rs, • L "�'• r . �' '. i . �V�l; . � .' • � . �, �J u -- _ rs-=- . . •,r ' uMYM/►+/li�, f .� � � � :. � � ' • • ' f1�s ! .- • . �•• �'�5��' I DD�'�ION i S�MUL ' �. ' . • - — � • " , � � IO��SE _ i .+ , ��ppiTiO�! - — �2ND w�r . • ,P.ri� �:t'� �!i' . - • � t�. � a i. �� I f i I• l� � � � • 1 ,.. .. . . . • . . N ,S� .. .. ,.... . . ,• ,�., �.�: 1�: . w�v[II [ �� „ � .� � �.r yn�. I ` � � Z �°' I � � . .. .. .. , •. . ��.� i � r. �;i . . , t . � . � • i : i� I/2 YrAi � � � ~ � � � . �: �. �" - �.��E.- .. s� :-�:: t� . �� ; a- � � � � i �� '- � ` . � . � , i i i � � • • .�.• a . �77 t J • , �l: ? � � �w •. �.w � _ . i �� V '� v � p L � f • � a s n . � 1 � �YER �f � � 'wr'�'' �-• 1�i . �f�.. ti, �; � coa � --W - � .I' • , '1 r J �I �l /� i � N r r �r ` r 1 � i: i.�/a � �� w j r yw :..�� " f f ' ��„'•�� .. � .� � ' • �• 1t 6o�r[• a� • • � N �YN .� MI� " y �[c�a Iy:..-.-,. . , .. . iwr �� r7 1�• w Ilr:.wi II/ `!``O �� :i !%' \ / � 7 • �s � �e9als of ►ublic P�operties That Could be Soid by the C{ty 1. Lot 14. dlock i. 8lomber� Estates t. Lot 15. elock 1. elon�e r9 Estates �_ �. Lot 16. dlotk 1. elomber� Est�tes 4. 'The Mest 80 feet of the SoutA 1S0 teet ot Lot 6. Auditor's Subdivision No. 129 5. Lot 1. dlock 7. Edqewater fwrdens 6. Lot ?. 81ock T. Edgewater Gardens � 7. lot 3. 61ock 7, Edgewate� 6ardens 8. lot 11, 81ock 20. Fridley Park LOT SIZE 1) 75' x 136.88' 2) 90' x 136.88' 3) 75' x 136.88' 4) 80� x 15Q.00' 5� 89' x 142.00' 6) 88' x 142,00' 7) 88' x 142.00' 8)'40' x 126.00' (SQUARE FOOTAGE) (10,266 ) (12,319.20) (10,266) (iz.000) (12,638) (12,496) (12,496) (05,040} *Sub-Standard by itself SF ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE TAXABLE VALUE ESTIMATE OF POSSIBLE SALES PRICE 17,200 21,500 18,500 17,200 i�,2oo 11.900 17,200 17,200 600 23,200 21,500 Zo,2oo 21,100 20,200 20,200 17,500 If buildable CVM 6/26/84 .. • �� ISEMCI T0: . 1rlEMO FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 R A N D U M John G. Flora ' Director of Public Works / Virgil C. gerzick i)l� Citp Attoraey Sale of Excess Property May 10, 1984 , ' . SG :.. This Memorandum is in response to your request, dated April 30, 1984, regarding the restrictions and procedures that need to be observed in the sele of certain properties held in the name of the City of Fridley. In that Memorandum you listed eight parcels of property and asked what restrictions, if any, applied to the sale of these properties or to the use of the proceeds from the sale. In addition, you have asked me to comment oa the general procedure to be followed in the 6ale of these,properties. The general provisions for the sale of real estate held by the City is contained ia Section 12.06 of the Fridley City Charter. This Sectioa reads as follows: "Section 12.06. SALES OF REAL PROPERTY. No resl property of the city shall be sold or disposed of except by ordinance. The proceeds of any such sale shall be used as far as possible to retire any outstanding indebtedness iacurred by the city in the purchase� constructioa, or improvement of this or other property used for the same public purpose; but if there be no such outstanding indebtedness, then the council may by a zesolution adopted by an affirmative vote of at least four members of the council designate some other public use for such proceeds." The following are specific comments on the properties involved. The aumbers cozrespond to the numbers used in your Nemorandum of Aptil 30, 1984. Psrcels 1 through 3 in the Blomberg Estates Were acquired by t�►e City in compliance vith the developer's requirement to coatribute lOX of the land for park purposes. There are no restrictions contained in the Deeds from the developer to � SN the City. �owever, because these propezties were acquired for park purpo6es� I am of the epinion that pur�uant to the Fridley City Charter, Section 12.06, quoted above, that the proceeds from the sale of these three parcels is restricted to use by the Park Department for park and rec=eation purposes. paYCel 4 consists of part of tWO Lots in Auditor's Subdivision No. 129. It was acquired by the City cf Fridley through a puYChase from the previous ovners. Neither the Contract for Deed, dated August 2, 1962, nor the Warranty Deed, dated May 22, 1964, contain any restrictions on the use of this property. As a matter of fact, the Contract for Deed states that the City is not restricted in the use of the property. Inquiry is made as to whether this property has been used for park purposes. If co, its use may have acted as a dedication in vhich case the proceeds wauld have to be used for park purpose�. Parcels S, 6 and 7 consisi of three lots in Edgewater Gardens. There are no restrictions on the sa�e or use of the proceeds of these three parcels. I do call to your attention that +� title to these properties is subject to an easement for mineral and miaeral reservations running to the State of Minnesota. If the propezties are advertised for sale, this limitation should be included as a part of the legal description. Parcel 8 consists of one Lot in Fridley Park, vhich Lot Was acquired by the City from the Great Northern Railvay CoIDpany on Februsry 10, 1961. An examiaation of the Deed does not show any limitations on the �ale or any dedication for use and. therefore, the City may sell this property and use the proceeds for any puzpose determined by the City Council. Again, I direct your attention to the fact that there is a mineral aad mineral reservation contained in the Deed and ,�, that this reservation should be mentioned in advertising the propezty aad contained in the Deed transferzing the property. The City is not required to advertise ihe properties for sale, although the Council may determine that this is the best procedure for �elling this property. The Minnesota League of Gities in its Handbook makes the following statement �^about the ptocedure for sale of real estate: "The procedure for conveyance of real estate is �imple. Where no bids are required and a buyer can be secured who is villing to pay vhat the council believes is a reasonable price, the council may pass a resolution making the sale of the property and directing the clerk and mayor to execute the necessary conveyance. The deed should be executed oa the psrt of a statutory city by the mayor and clerk and sealed with the corporate aeal. In the case of home rule cities, charte= requirements ahould be complied with. If bids ste advertised for, the council should first adopt a resolution directing the clerk to make the advertisement and, after determining which is tbe best bid, it should adopt another resalution accepting the bid, making a �ale to the successful bidder. and directing the clerk and mayor to execute the necessary conveyance. If funds received fzom the sale are not to be put in the general fund. their disposition should be provided for in the resolution making the sale." I vould suggest that once it is properties� that the procedute If advertising is to be done, I before it is published. Also, the property should be reviewed Office. cc: Mr. Nasim M. Qureshi City Manager _ � determined to sell these be revieved with our Office. would like to look at the ad the documents transferring by the City Attorney's 5I � l/, RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1983-1 AND 57. 1983-2 8E I7 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of fridley, Minnesota, as follows: •� 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEt9ENT PROJECTS ST. 1983-1 AND ST. 1983-2 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate show- ing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet i� regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times sinte its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modi- fied was and is specially benefited by the ' STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1983-1 AND ST. 1983-2 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modi- fied by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 6a Page 2, RESOLU7ION N0. - 1984 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1983-1 AND ST. 1983-2 8. The amounts assessed each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of nine and one-half (9z) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable on 66th Avenue in fifteen (15) annual installments and on the balance of the project shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments, payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1985, and con- tinuing until all of said installmeqts shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the Cou�ty Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF • 1984• MAYOR William J. Nee A7TESi: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman 7 RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 BE IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of _land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified -- was and is specially benefited by the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJEC7 S7. 1983-4 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 7A Page 2--RESOLUTION NO.. - 1984 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments�for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certi- fied to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and sha11 there- upon be and constitute the special assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1983-4 8. The amounts assessed a9ainst each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of nine and one-half (9�) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1985, and tontinuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. M Y R W� llam J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman RFSa[�ION ND. _ - 1984 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPRO�VEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF OOSTS �iEREOF: STREET I[�gpVF�+lE�T pRp7ELT Np. ST. 1984-1 & 2(ADDII�IDUM #3) Wf3F�, R,esolution No. 5g-1984 adopted on the 7th day of May� 1984, by the City Council, set the date for hearings on the proposed improvements as specif icall� noted in the Notioe of Hearing attached thereto for reference as Exhibits "A , and, WH�F'.AS, all of the property awners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these impravenents (as noted in said notice} v�re given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notioe of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notioe, and the hearings were helc3 and the property awners heard thereon at the hearings as notecl in said notioe: NOW, �iF.EtF�FORE, BE IT RFSCGUID by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka Co�.mty, Minnesota as follaws: 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 58-1984 are hereby or3ered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible, ta-wit: Street Impravements, including grading, stablilized base, hot-mix bitu¢ninous mat, ooncrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, and other facilities located as follows: Capitol Street Main St. to Hughes Ave. 2. �at the work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be degned advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall, Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such impravements. PASSID At�ID ADC)PrID BY 24iE CITY aJ[TNCIL OF' �IE CITY OF FRIDLEY 'ifIIS DAY OF , 1984. • � WII,LIAM J. NEE - MAY�R ATI'F�'T: SIDNEY C. Il�II�1AN - CITY CZERK 2,/8/18/18 �� r.• ciT� o� FRI L Y p1AECTORATE O � PUBLIC WORKS DATE May 3, 1984 FROM D.P,W. Mark Burch- Engineerin SUBJEC�pital Street Improvements ��,�yC/ 8A _,� + • • �� ; . • �� • I 1•� � � � • • - ,;;�,� MEMO N0. 84-65 TO John G. Fl We received a petition signed by 8 of the 14 residents (57%) who live along Capital Street requesting that their street be improved with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous mat. ACTION I INFO• The petition will be presented to the City Council on May 7th. If the Council decides to order a public hearing and ultimately order the improve�nents for construction in 1984 we would be able to add it to our existing contract without letting ne►v bids. MB/ de � ;•� � CITY OF FRIDLEY PET ! T1 UN CO�VER SliEET Peti � ion N.�. 5-84 Date Received May 2, 1984 Object For Street, Curb and Gutter, and Storm Sewer Improvement _ along Capital Street Peti[ion Checked By Date percent Signing Referred to City Council . Disposi[ion ✓ 8C l�TITIO� tOR 3?AEET. C01t8 �D Q0�'�EA �D SiORM Sa1iEA DSPRO�S�1R5 � IAIDLET. MI�Ii8S4'!� �pril. t96s To tbe Cit� Council o! Fridle�. Minnesota: � T6e unQ�raisned� being • r�ority of tbe property ovners of t�e proD�Ttition t�aB CaDitol str�et� vhich vill Denefit py tLe propc�cd isprovesents. Der�O� � ator� s�y�r •ains pe proviae0 p� tbe Cit� froe tbeir esistio( locationa to accoss�at� tee �Dove referenced propertiss; �i.SO tQat street iaprovements of �dequate uctional discnsioos. coaaistin6 of concrete curD and Sutter and Dituminous surtacing pe pro�ided py the City on Capitol Street from Main Street to Nughe� Aveaue. It i� un�er�toeC that tAe coat of said ioprovemeets vill pe assessed again�t the penefited propertie� aa outlined in Minne�ota Statutea Chapter •29•00. It is al�o under�tood that it is 1ePo�siDle at thi� ti�e to �ive an �ccurate tatimate of the coat ot the S�D�evlove�t be�siDleecost�commenaurate�vithyprudenteA�ndling tDy to be con�tructed at tA � tAe City in a normal �ssessment pro�ect. The underai�ned� Deing s sa�ority of the property ownera vho vill penefit from said street, curD hear�inCefor saido mDrovementa�vhi h i�o�llored Dunaervthe normal to a puDlic B proceaurea aet forth in !linne�ota Statute� Chapter �29.00. , ��HES� ✓ � , v .$".,z�� C' �r.':..�. IT sa� - i'--- '- / �i _ 2 -C , �� r . �� '�� - , .� � � s �� V � � ;,.�' . � . � — s . . �A� :' .Q �� _ 8D . ' r � ., � . � � r� KNCCORNER � , S � � 3 sE� i s4i ` s � s Z ;� � �� a +t '' !1i- I r��J., �t• �i�� ,f. � 9 1ru � �j�s ,ti - , � � I _ ,� � •_ ', s : .� --��"`r" - s j � �' ' ` ~ a ' '+�� j1•�''• � �� , � � _i��+... ' ' �� ,~ •� �.Y , y �, �Ir'M.W��iI• ♦ �0 � SZ � � ,�• '� � � t� ' . � �� s � "sTs � �t9 -- �.��.- --r ` o �,• : � -t � �� t � i� � r = tL�� 5261 ; � - �' — R ' � � � !;' ° ° ° � i�9 -- -� � � . � 'C� �� ! + -. t �nr o0 000 0 � ei l �� I �, o : � i � � � i'=y' _. � � � oa O° � o°o o° ' � = 1 p0o °pQ �popo� � ./[� i � ;�t� . ` ° ��,� ,.:• — � � � � SL �1 S�zS Z3d ;� � � _:� . � a°o o°o °o o°o° o�o � 1 � �• �°�°�° °oo�o� o° o� �° - ; ' _ 1 i , a �.�� r e` � � �9�0 .'� Zs�� } � '� / '.j' � � p ° o o � . t r ,. � � o �,� °°� �� z �� ! PI �� _ - , . � ?' ^ • - � � �' � � • � �'.1 _ L1 L � � � ,� � I _ _ � ,.. q Q ' __ ; . , , SI j `� : M S��9 v � �� , _ � s �'1 i��rr S(1�0 � �. `, . nr � _ � � '. ,- t � '� ,�� S�(� ; S11i s , .--- . S 1 �„ � .� 1 $ �2 � ' t � ' ' '� 120 �'� Sl�i � � �1�� t F SIO � �SI Y'. _ .. 3 �, � i � L10� ti ; t •i • �, f. ~ ,. t _ � � �2 s ,.► � � �6 Sor�i � � . iZ� � ' 1 � � � , f,; spe `• se� s e '� E s �� — �. � . ♦ . s r� � �3� � [� � ` - � Sp�Z Z� � �`� � . ~ ' ' ; � .. � � � � �Z�► �,_ � : -,�.f' � _ � r:___ . I y��'4 y� � i,p � S �r r "�R ' �. I �: � , � ,a Sp�'1 ",• ' � _ .-• ! . - �i � __ ec _ � `�t '. . �,� f � c .: � � � � � ' � - < a.-. ' ` �70� � ,: : ' � ��` �1 � � � ,� - -. � s S03 . _ � . .�: � t' - . 50�1 - . . : _ �i �Z �Z s , s �� ` ... : _, f � , �' s . ,�► •. . �, _ � ! , � --�; - � So�t So13 ��s �r S�S S'° � i '}" # ' i � 1- 't� . �* } ' t• �� s . � / a� � %1 . � �� . . , � �� - . � _ %s ZzS sos� � # � r . - - -� - -.: " . _ � � � � � ,' � � ._' i�i 1� � � --- � t � � 1 . . j � � �r�. � � -- � RF��Q�] N�. _. - 1984 R�TTICIN ORDg2Il�lG AND APPROVAL OF PI.ANS 11ND APPRWIl�]G �IANGE ORDIIt �1 F�R SD2f.�.T IMPROVE[�NT �'ROJECT A]�. ST. 1984-1 � 2 (ADDF�ID[JM �3) i�lF�tFAS, Resolution No. 59 - 1984 adopted on the 7th day of May, 1984, by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements as specifically noted in the Notioe of Hearing attached thereto for reference as EXZ'11b1tS �A"� �� WHF�tFAS, all of the property vwners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these i�ravene�ts (as noted in said notioe) w�ere given ten (10) days notioe by mail and published notioe of the Council Hearing through two (2) w�eekly publications of the required notioe, and the hearings were held and the property awners heard thereon at the hearing as noted in said notice: rnd WHF�tFAS, Resolution No. _- 1984 adoptec7 by the City Council of the City of Fridley ordered all of these im�rovements. K7W, THIItg'ORE, BE IT RF�CGVID by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows: l. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 5&-1984 are hereby or3ered to be effected and canpleted as soon as reasonably possible, t�wit: Street 7mprwene�ts, including grading, stablilized base, hot-mix bit�ninous mat, aoncrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer systen and other facilities located as follows: Capitol Street Main St. to Hughes Ave. Zt�at the work involved in said i�rwenents as listed above shall hereinaf ter be included as part o�: S�tE�'T I1�bOVF?4� PfbOJDCT ST. 1984-1 & 2(ADDII�7t1M #3) 2. TY�e plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Director for such improvements and each of them pursuant to the Council resolutions heretofore adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attached and mac3e a part thereof, are hereby appraved and shall be f iled with the City Qerk. Page 2— Resolution No. _- 1984 PASSID AND ADOPrID BY 7�IE QTY �UI�IL OF �iE CITY OF FRIDR�EY �IIS L1P,Y OF , 1984. WII,,LIAM J. I�E - MAYI�R 1�iR'I£ST: SIDNE,'Y C. II�II�7AN - CITY Q.F.RK ?�8/18/20 9R 98 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division CITY OF FRIDLEY Fridley, Minnesota June 14, 1984 NDH, Incorporated 700 Industry Avenue Northwest Anoka, Minneosta 55303 Subject: Change Order 1, Street Improvement Project St. 1984 - 1& 2 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract for Street Improvement Project St. 1984-1 and 2 by adding the following work: ADDITION Street construction including Class V base and concrete curb and gutter on Capital Street. Original Contract Price . . . . . $ 449,095.25 Change Order 1(St. 1984 - 1&2) .$ 40,352.07 REVISED CONTRACT PRICE $ 489,447.32 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director on the 14th day of June, 1984. Prepared by _ Checked by � !I�_ / � John G. Flora, P.E. Public Works Director Page 7wo Letter to: NDH, INC. Change Order 1, St. 1984 - 1&2 June 14, 1984 Approved and accepted this day of , 1984 by NDH, Inc. NDH, Incorporated .� �� % v � P 8y William B. Miller, Vice President Approved and accepted this Council of Fridley, Minnesota � � day of , 1984 by the City WILLIAM J. NEE Mayor NASIM M. QURESHI City Manager 9C o�n�aaE r�. AN �2DIN�NCE TO AMEND THE CITY OODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MARING A CHANGE IN SONING DIS'RICl� � R�e Cou�cil of the City of Friciley does ordain as follvws: SFCTION l. Appenc3ix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicat�ci. SF�CTION 2. �e tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and c3escribed as: R�at part of Lots 3 ar,a 24, not taken for highway purposes, and all of Lots 4� 5� 6� 7� 19� 20� 21� 22 and 23, B1oCk 19� Fridley Park. along with that part of Lots 3 and 21, not taken for highway purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8► 9• 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 20, Fridley Park, lying in the South half of 5ection 15, T-30, I�24 � City of Fr idley, Co�ty of Anoka, Mi.nnesota. Is hereby c3esic,g�ated to be in the Zoned Districk known as R-3 (general multiple dwellings). SDCTIC�13. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to shok� said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District R-1 (one family dwellings) to 1�3 (general multiple dwellings). PASSID AI�ID ADOFI'ED BY �lE CITY �[JNC� OF ZfiE CITY OF FRIDLEY Zf]IS L1AY OF , 1964. WILLIAM J. I�E - MAYt�R ,f��'� SIA�'Y C. II�4•!AN - CITY Q�iR Public Aearing: J�e 18, 1984 First Reading: Seoond Reading: Publish: ZOA #�84-02 DeGardner 10 .t! r _ '�� - `"' �,�t�4 ` � � � • � - - — � - � .�..y� � �,►3 _ �� ,�. � :1 f � , �oa � , , .. {�,3 ; ,�<N- °�'— � s ��TH - w�►Y ,� � ! f '�.•� ~' _ �' � - I' i s � � ;� � i r l�4� �� . � . •, � � � � _�_ � � ' � • I . �. � � • .r .�► .t� ss • ,+ �,t ' �. • , � � / 3 �'! I j' 1� 1 � • � ; jg'r� � = n� � ; � wlar : � � � � r � t �, /� ' ;154� 11'i ,t �► � �r �I s � � � ; � i� � �s.. �ss� n��. t 1 � . , {� JQ�� /�l! /�� , ; ; ' wAY :s �- � . _ �. � � ;�r �. �' ' � T � I � 1 / � �� 3 �? � /�j � � �-. Rp ` " ' w�i � , � .- . �_..��_�.�.+ ''r �� \ J�� •; � ;• �t�i 1 � ; r � � w . , . . � r • ' - . - � .�r�..>>�� .�� ' �" � �� .:��.�r ,7(i� t�� i� -�� I�� K T'� D-r� , � If � � � ! .�: .1 � � �• � ... � � 611/2 . 1�IAY : ± �� d ,, ,, � ,w .. ' �'�' �Od^-�a�� c E� D� WAY • . � � .�� 'rc �� id8 1�t � ; � � x � n �� .. , ._ • r. ,r,, . � � I'�.--' L�� .,. � �� r •.r I' , � ;� A. #84�0 .j' Gardner J l� � � t.� ---�a,�rj._ �-.��.• � s, �-�'-''J �� 10 A 'nr a� � S�T�LL !► '.,`, � / t4 � S s � �b M � 11/ � s � V��s r w i SYL, � f�� 1 l f /OO � I' � � e► � . �' i�1r � * � A TTi4�jT'Y fl , �` � , c t�� t� `z! Lt � L � � _ ;' � Z� � � � �i � � j!ro s �'��,•, - ��. LZe/ +�� o � `,'"�--�-- `-� . �l y ,e� F a K w � � 't � w,. 11 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING CONMISSION MEETING. JUNE 20. 1984 CALL TO OROER: _ Chairwoman Schnabel called the June 20. 1984� Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: .� Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist� Ms. Gabel. Mr. Nielsen. Mr. Kondritk. Mr. Saba � Menbers Absent: Mr. Minton Others Present: Jim Robinson� Planning Specialist Gary b Cheryl Michurski� 298 Ely St. N.E. Don Nanson� 1482 Onondaga St. N.E. APPROVAL OF JUNE 6. 1984� DLANC�ING COMMISSION MINUTES: NO"IOl: BY HR. KOl�DRI CK � SECOI: DED BY !LS . GABEL , TO APPROVE THE Jl11V� 6, 2 9 8Q , PL�:::: Il: G COM."!I SS ION !�!I i� UT£S AS idRl �'1'EN . UP01► A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAJ SCNNABEL DECLARED THE INOTID.': CATiRI£D UNAJ�INOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: COWSIDERATION OF A REQIlEST fOR A SPECIAL llSE PERMIT SP �84-11, 8Y C�{ERYL A. MICHURSKI: Per Section 245.07,1� 3 A of t e ri ley City Co�e, to allow— t►�e construction of a second accessory building, a 22 ft, by 24 ft, detached garage on lots 47 and 46, Block 11, Spring Brook Park. the same being 298 Ely Street N.E. 'JOTIDN BY AlR. XQNDRICX, SECONDED BY I�1R. OQUIST, 41D OPEN TXE PUBLIC 1�EARING QN SP %�B4-11. UPDI►' A VDICE VD:i, ALL YDTING AYE, CHAIRW�MAN SCHN�EEL DECIAR£L TNE PUb�IC NEAP.ING OPEA' 11T �s33 P.y. Mr. Robinson stated this lot was located on the southeast corner of Ely St. and Ruth St. The lot is approximately 8,680 sq. ft. The special use permit is • for a second accessory building, a 22 ft. by 24 ft. garage, to be built in the rear yard and be set back 30 ft. f rom Ruth St. to make it compatible with the existing fiouse to the rear which faces Ruth St. According to code, when the lot to the rear of a corner lot faces the side street, the setback is 30 ft. He stated he had discussed this with the petitioner and she is agreeable to that. Mr. Robinson stated the other stipulation vias that the driveway be paved, and the petitioner is also agreeable to that. 11 A PLA��r�ING C0�15S10N MEETING. JUNE 20. 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated there is an alley there that is an unpaved, unimproved a11ey. The petitioner might want to consider petitioning to have it vacated. � Ns. Schnabel asked the petitioners if they had any conmeiits to make about this request. Mr. Gary Michurski stated the neiqhbor directly to the east also has a double unattached garage at the back of his house. He stated the only reason they are considering this garage is because they have an existing single car garage. They own three vehicles. Since they both work, they have to continue to move the three vehicles, and one ends up left on the street more than it should. He stated they have one vehicle they use seasonally, and they would like to store it in the garage. He stated they will continue to use the existing garage as a garage. Ms. Schnabel stated that if the Michurski's wanted the additional property in their back yard, they might want to approach their neighbors about requesting the City to vacate that alley. JNOTION BY MR. SABA, SECOND£D BY 1lS. GABEL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC XEARING ON SP MB4-11. UPON A VDICE VOTE, AZL VOTINC AYE, CXAIRWOFIAN SCNNABEL DECLT+RrD TNE PI�BLIC hiEARING CLOSED AT B: a0 P.JN. 1�lO:IDt: BY INR. KOI�DRICK, SECD':DED BY 1►Di. SABA, TD RE'CON.INEND TD CIT}' COU::CIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAZ USE PERM.IT REQUEST, SP N84-II� B}' CHER}'L A. MICNUP5I:I, P£R SECTION ?05.07.2 , 3 A, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOt:' TH� COl1STRUC- TI01J OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BU:LDING, A 2? FT. BY 20 FT. D£TACHED GARAG£ Ol: LOTS Oi Alti'D OB� BLOCK lI, SPRING BRODK PAR?:, TXE SA1�!E BEING ?98 ELY STREI'T N.E. � MITH THE STIPULIITIDN THAT TH£ DRIYEI�AY TO TH� NE:' GARA�E B£ PAVED R;:D A 30 FT. 5£TBACK B£ 1NAINTAINED. i7!''ON A VDICE VOT£, ALL VOTING AYB, CHAIfth►OJN.r.lV SCXNABEL DECLARSD TI!£ MOTIOh CARRIED iJltiAillPlDUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this special use permit request would go to City Council on July 2. 2, LOT SPLIT REQUEST, 1.5. #�B4-08, BY DpN HAt7 i� : Split off the Southerly T�1� feet of Lot 28,�u�itor's Sub3ivision No.129, to make a new building site at 1501 13 1/2 Avenue N.E. 'Mr. Robinson stated this lot was located between Onondaga St, and 73rd Ave., just west of the 73'-2 Ave. cul de sac. The ]ot is quite large, 34,000 sq. ft. The proposed new lot wculd be to the south and would be 13,500 sq. ft. Mr. Robinson stated there are several very large lots that have the potential of being split off in the future. For that reascn, there is the p�tential that 73� could go through and end in another cu1 de sac. 11B PLANNING COMMISSlON MEETING, JUNE 20, 1984 __ PAGE 3 Mr. Robinson stated there were quite a few pretty basic stipulations that would go with th e lot split. ' - Mr. Robinson stated that at this time, the Planning Connission tould either approve the lot split with stipulations, or they could hpld an informal ' public hearing and invite the neighbors to the west to see if they were interested in splitting their lots as well. possibly putting the street in. and getting this all done at one time. That would be better than having the owner of the new lot put in a driveway to the cul de sac on 73', and then have to �emove the driveway in the future if the street was put in. Mr. Robinson stated another consideration was the front yard setback. The exisitn house to the east is set back 65 ft. f rom what would be this lots's right of way, due to the cul de sac. If they were to tak an average of this lot and a possible future lot to the west of the proposed split, assuming a 35 ft. setback to the west. the average would De 50 ft. W1th an allowed deviation of 6 feet, the minimum setback for the proposed lot would be 44 ft. The rear yard would be 25 feet. The proposed right of way is 25 ft. and this leaves 27 ft. for a structure, which is a reasonable structure. Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recomnend the following stipulations: 1. Provide 25 ft, street easement for possible future use 2. Concrete curb work on 73'-; to be done by City's tontractor at owner's expense 3. Petitioner to provide driveway to street 4. Driveway to be rertaved at no cost to the City in the event the street goes through 5, Signed park fee agreement of s750 6. Sp1it to be registered at the County prior to issuance of a building permit, or before October l5, 1984. 7. Front yard setback of 44 fL. 8. Rear yard setback of 25 ft. Mr. Robinson stated this seemed like a good opportunity to look at the possible future develo{�ment of that whole area. Perhaps the Planning Comr.ission should hcld an informal public fiearinp and table the 10! snlit at �hi� cime. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Hanson if he had talked to his neighbors about the possibility of thear splitting their lots. Mr. Hanson stated he has talked to the neighbor who owns Lot 26, and he was not opposed to the idea. He stated there is a new owner of Lot 24 so - he did not know the plans of the new owner. Ms. Schnabel stated that if the petitioner was not in a real hurry with the lot split. the Planning Carmission could table this until their July 18th meeting. This would give the City the opportunity to contact all the owners of these lots to see if they rre interested in splitting a7so. and invite them to an informal public hearing at the next meeting. She stated this would certainly be to the petitioner's advantage. Mr. Hanson stated fie had no problem with having this tabled until the Planning Comrnission's July 18th meeting. . 11 C PLAN��ING COh�MlSSION MEETING JUNE 20 1984 PAGE 4 MOTIDN BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED DY l�2. SABA� 7b TABL£ LOT SPLIT RFQU£S?, . L.S NBO—OB� 8Y D�N �lCCLUSXY IA1 OeRDER 1'D 80LD 1W INFORMAZ. PiTBLIC BEARIAG • MITH THE NEIGNBORS GYV JIJLY 18� 29BI. � 17P�ON A YDICE VOTE, u.L VOTINC AYE, CNAIRiJO!lA.V SCNNABEL DECLIIR£D TNE PlOTSDJ► GRRSED UNANIMDUSLY. 3. RECEIVE JUNE 12 1984 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: 1lOTIDN BY �LS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. NIELSEN, TD RSCEIV£ TXE JUNE 2I, 1984, J�P APEwL.S CONMISSIQN MINiTlES. Ms. Gabel stated she would like the Planning Corm�ission to discuss public hearings on lot splits. She was referring to the recent lot split requested by John Hitchcock on the corner of Mississippi St. and Oakley Drive. She stated once the neighbors were notified through the Appeals public hearing process. they came to the meeting en masse. The neighbors were definitely opposed to that lot split. She stated the Appeals Com'�ission voted unanimously to deny the request for variances. They �elt the variances were created by the lot split. and that there was no hardship. Mr. Robinson stated he has distussed this with Mr. Qureshi� and it was Mr. Quresl�i's suggestion that whenever the Planning Cor�ission feels a public hearinq is necessary or helpful, they can table the discussion ar�d notify the neighbors and have an informal puDlic hearing, like wl�at Was dane at this meeting. Ms. Gabel stated she did not agree with that. Based on the fact that the City is bs built up as it is. she felt they are going to have more and more lot split requests, and it is going to be more a�d more controversial. She felt that the neighbors who are affected have the right to be notified. She felt very strongly about this. Mr. Oquist stated his question would be: Why would they not wa*�t to have public hearings for lot splits? Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Ms. Gabel. They are going to be getting more lot split requests, they are going to be more a�d more complicated. and they are going to affect more and more people down the 1ine. _ UppN A VDICE YDTE, 1LI.L YDTING A]'E, Ci3AIRf�01NAy SCNh148EL DECI.ARiD THE A!D?ION ' — GIRRIED ilA A�ti II'lDiJSLY. Ms. Schnabel asked if Staff could prepare some type of propcsal for a change in the ordinance by the July 18th meeting. This could be used as a starting point for discussion. Mr. Robinson stated he could da that. He stated he would like to discuss this with Dave Newman, City Attorney. and he would like to find out what �eighboring comnunities are doing. 11 D PLANNING COMt1ISSI0N MEETING JUNE 20 1984 PAGE S ADJOURNMENT: iOTI01V BY l�Dt. XONDRICX, SEL�ONABD 8Y Mi. SASA, TO ADJOURN THE 1�ETING. VP�IV A VOI YOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, Cil1CIRWOINAN SCHNABEL D£CI.ARED TJiE .TiJNE ?0� 2980, �LAIVNING CONMISSIDN 1�ETING ADJWRNED �T 8:25 P.1l. �Res ectfully submitted. -�c �..Z lynne Saba Recording Secretary . ��P #84-11 Cheryl Mischurski 11 E � _ __. _ _ ___________�_______ _-_ 5 .__. �_i.��_��a��__� f• 1- � .. �`" „� . . �.. �'��i �' �i� � � . � . � � `� � t � .M� ' � ��A �. � L . . Rk� � G7�+7 _ ,.� � - y �,. s • �sJr` . ... — _ � "�ifL.�'. .... )fi s ` I - - T!� l� N� � ; , �i' , ''a ��S �o ° T T' � �. t � S1MMi �� MOOK � � � � I � •- - 1 � � '�qf: t • 'C� � .:. � W � � � . 7 4`L A'MM' /Z j� ; • � ; '� -f7.. � � � ? .° + d ! � 7 S o / ii :.• %s N � K ��I N if i ��1 � �,. .: �. � � , r�o ' �'� �`� ' , H i �i 3 �j ` I �,,,�, , .. .� •e��' ;' � ; . a + ' •,: x � . �,. � ti ,_ � . � u� �.. 3, ,+ . : EL � y� • c a .' �,�� v`I � �� '�r. d r L... + lr I�.' -i�?IG N;qf K;i� MI.� �'�w, �,, ' R �» ' i I � � ` � Qr S + • .rr'', �0� f I �E .i 3! ;Ji !G{t �I7 i, � `� �/�r/ r � • f � _ � � ,� s S 3'S '�pZ , , _ � � � s t s t 1 1 ( � '• ( � ,i -R�� M\ irl3s,� � � ~ ). � - r r I� ' s IS , 1'�� r` `'� ��"' �i , .. � C /'? � �4 J' E 9 I�C ii /� (i. ��: �C / .f�H '� 1: ! � i o 3 � 4 �� !. ��g �� £- ;� ' � a 3+r'""' � 1s�°'�+ sa � '�A � `T ' . �"� � � , � : -. � LISERTY ' �"'' : � �=' ° . N / �. � / �S ' �• � ` �' -:« ---� is 2 0 � ¢ !. f � a � . . � I ;.X � ��p'� � :`�t -� +� •� '� . :{�� ,r� '�' ;' �3� � � I � �� 1 i' � � ' � .. rn - � � <----� --�nt y I � � . �� s . ��, � � ,a - �� ' ' I I 1 � 1 � - �� - r 3 1 S s � 7 I � ! c i, � /J a! � . :i � . � `_ ' �/ -' /' E ' P /! � 1 _ � ^ � .• • I ; : ' � ' ' �; �� i � +3 �, -= :. �., �� 3b3 � � 1 R Lfr4 3 s81 iuS f w` 1r , o• X .v L�lN6 FELLOw � \ , � � , '�i0 �, I �� I . ` ` 10 • _ t�L� � � � Z a ' � � � _ - • ��. �1 ✓% h ✓ ' � J� _'_r /1 !� �� f Zl �X� i. i � "_, � 3K �► `�i?� "�: � • t,� 4z� 'c a �. 3 0 , ` 1�,� ' �, , I ,. ' �� \ . ,, , ` „ � .�- . � � , �:., � �� S �3� fs.; Og s s !�' � � � 3�1 � 's �\ , a '.�'. ' • � � � , . sY� . . , ; f'j♦ - � � F S yr r� �� ✓? � � 3 I 'I ;f ! �qr �i 4 /o � f \ Sa ; - s� // ;.1 i� N � .✓ '�is�y. a� ' � � � • � /7 e- �. Ys '1i � � i � ( �j � � f � 1• �; s. . K � 1 i G ,� .t ; --..��• N, � �G�-f � nr w r ^`'Yr,� . : � � : �ri � � , � L v ,rur w C t �' . s �� • w+� CtJ •!' �i.//�r = ia T' ` � � � � � •~r � �f'1�7��' �� • ►'�� t '' • � ' (�Ir�It IV/f� i • � �•`j, �� .. ' � t + /�' � � �1' * � �` >I � �� •.' � D/ / � � ��, s'� � `�{ r .� ,� � � / q, ' ,. r V �� It� s �4 . ` '� ' �P.� %p � �• ' i� •, � . �,� , � �«, . �� ' ` � �� .�, � ,�,.. �e �' � d� ~ ` p�'' � `��c��,�° �op `� Q`�� . • '� ,� ` � . t�, , �, � , � ,� '� , �� - h Q .,� t � � J► 9�Q �' _ . � ��! , y �" , , ,�' �4 pc N i �� : � ' , e`1 . M� � . � ., 1 +k.. J � �.. �: 'y�� t � `. ' +": y, +:r'R.` ` - -�.C'.` k s., ,� :'. ,( ` va��'1�. . ` � � `�` .. �� _:k � ]► : }` p �._: . -~r � . � . �;,sy•? y'• .� :r �.. "�, ' • f� S �N � •(� Mn ,� � A'y� ",'� �r�j ��'� l_:4 � ..,7�. e ��4 { � � � . .. * �� .� rr �#� - '�� „�:a"' ...�yry��c_ f }S'r��'"";_.:� :�_..'".. t y � `- „ ;� �5. '."' �Yi= ' v r'., ti�, �.� �;t �i;�" ,,� � s�a�, � _ L 'r �, � � ' '> � �'� �.�v . � ♦ �`� 1 � ��, j� , ♦ ' r � � .1� �,. .. � .,a,�, -'li .a • ` .�,},r'�5 1.� C w . . a� ; � '�[�� - � .-2 E ?� �•�. Y•�` sy `"0 ' i. . ' '�+` �c ota ` �", ,,, � " _ }t � � 'S' � .7'''� YY. � s ! .la. � � - t � "��l . � , � � '�•.'�. �r :s's � �� +�as.,i,� � .. � .� � � � ,d'�yy.` Yy�„ vt . f ' a� t ' ( �• � ' . � � 1:�` � � ,l,�y ' 4. �?� e;-f-ie. �i�, _ t ' - 1 y.. x, I `,L ` #:r3 r • _ `� ; .. . j . _ z .. . �� :.�, �+ - .� a �.� � Z'- t � .� a"6.d.��, . �� - - � � � _ . � ~ . �¢ • �F j �� , t * � i�"* i..�:•S e'P�� '��1,,,� t-.�'�.� -.��, •�C'y`'}�. . 4d` ' ''.'�� i...: �. . ;�a' �ti, ' < „ #�. ' ' �..�c �� r �';�°'+ ��`� ��t ��.,`� . '' i � #i � �C � � rt ��► i .�k�,+ t �l �.-5.� ` ` ' �� " * � � � �� S' �^ � :`."�g � f� . . ,,, ` �'t � �,�, �!r ,� � •-,�M � ' � � ' `q � t 4 ,y * 'R' .�• � � ' . ��-��,��1� �'. �+. ' K � .S� l .M � i �� . �A .I1� .�' . �.� . ' .� e :. �� j� ��1 � ^'� � � '� . . -e T , �y ��i'., �!'`` . • -� ,,��,' ,t ,, E*�, . , _ s�"W,?A��!`.�'�'� � :.i_ �, � r, �a � 3��'�'• �'��`"1 F� � r � ��- r S� �. ; �".: � � s - '.; :. +hi4 �.:��7c@� i� �:��''�^ � �� .��y�+F�-v�. ,t � � �'�o . � , �� ` �� `� � 'd � z.. . 'J�t' L': Y' � � �t � . ♦ \ ,~�� 'y' .« �, , r sr � . ra,,,� ro� � � `�+• •L�'�s �Tl� � .T �r �,1 .y; .e-� ��' � '� �� '`�� ' �� - i. s _r ... �`+ � `� ', � �t i' '� 1 Y ��+. � . • I�� .. I � .. ��Y�.Y- ? Y' � V -� � •3 �'; � �Y ` aA �"�'� �y. S•S�� ' ` r . . '�t�� . . � `• ` . � �� • ..' '- + �° . • � �� '- � r�Srt,. = 4 s '�` � � : ,4 �, r �,}i �` •c `d -� ',,'�. �Y� rTs_.� �,y�S .� � *y��i� � , R. ��~ .4• - �, a r '� . �. . � �_ �; ` �; �'!ti.."'� -; . F .: ' . .`�R�� i < � : � ' Si`;;i . ^�'_' s ti . C�% 7 . +� ti � �;�" 1 � `� ��*a � � J� �� '� � �l � ` E. �, �;L .�{ .� ti � a � c- � � f� � �� ._ y�» W t� , �,. i ,�.t� �. � �. � ,s� .�. a�� -K. '�..�r-�v .9 ;;��(.,• .r`.� � •�';'Y � r s' ,;. ��t�'� '+s.'- y.• . i�• .'�. _ � x � ,y�. �$ ?'1 .: ��! .:�.�: �� - +.�.Y}. . � �rL� � '� �� - �� S� � r.`. '; �: . . . , � � �� - � � � _ , . _ _ • . � �w _ � . - � � i _ , . - . � '�"' ��'�- �* �� + • � l� . ~ 4 .�-� � iL.. s � �� 'r � ��Y� � � ~ ��', � � r • � S � I�F ±. `..�Y y � ... - J - . � . .�:� y . • 'T� _ � . .f?r � y '1 'J, f- - ' ��: . E �. .`'�`ti-' .j�a._ . :y'� 4 � �.qt 4� _ -fq. 1l�l�+ j�� S �+a 7 - r �, � y, � . . . � 4_ y' � , j . vf +,-' t �',�{ �'. .s c.+,�?� 1 � �,�. _� . . � �� I .H � `.' . . t •t .�x�� ,� . Si'} ��Y\`.�i �r �i. � �'^�♦ �� ; � . �r'i�i�s , � t:.. �yf c_ * . �. :� -�-•a�1��. . � {� *,.c_+� ' � �a �� `�` i � �'# `Y+ � - < � �� `� �..o'_' . £,. . J'.� . ... r-�r•h-h +e" ` .i� , a �F.%!-+. i.'�� -�A •+�.,,� } 7y� .. ». �ts � p� 41: ,�} F'""'6,¢ �.� ?t �� ' 7FC �'�' F � .�e r'tt �_ ,y, � � r c ` Y . . i��'� ."'�1�,� - s,k %.'yZ+� �i-� �,� ., � �4, s�'t�a a �T - x' �s�" i� h` � '- '� :��`•' � s'a � �I{'S . ". t+`,- sj ,� } {�,~ae:-�,.�4^ �� -` � _ � �-r � �,- �.�tM g" '.� 7 .1 ' �„ � �` u •. �x �yE .'' t t''t'S` � e^r... y. ' 4 .ii�'�t� �, � , d y�'''� ? �� 1' . . ' � - � � � � ' r., v'�' t'�i y ��`"#iz �� t 4�,� .� • .i�i„��. 4 � � ��t - a " �. i ' w}� :X� `�;., � ` 1 t' ;� w'� iN - , � � -, 5� . . ,. ?'-• ' i �' � r ie ,. � � '�h �;r +r �'- ? , � . . ..y. `3 �.'� � � { r r �' r x' S � .c ., � 5yj�•.+r ��i f YR�. � .✓� . . . ! . i f � .. • , �ti,y r � � �g.. %T yil %^}'�yy �` a �� c a f :� �'. �- �• ... � ,� i ? ,b_ y.�7�y i °t' S,�- � tt o ��q� ^� � !(r� L ;t-i�'�K'�� ^� =-4� �f.►!..� � _ . o- -� . � r , � �� " f►'' „ ,. x -a�r�s ± - ��S ' �„� � � 'ti' �� Y � _ _ '�y . ,�� + .. :� ��: �' .. ` Y �� - ' _�� . �...►.,�►" . . ' � `,�r + �t. � � .�� _ .. 4 , '"'. �. . �r y' . ' i , - a^ ? � `., � • �� ';.. : � • 1�r� �� i. `'" � 3� ' � •�: � '�`�` } ::a � . � '• � .:+,�` -+ # t�'' � �'.: ;�,e�� "' ��-" �''��`:.+ �2'R-. � � �r� � .; . r� ' � $ : v s . �fi. 'c : �s�` .LS .1ak ,.�'�' �'� ' ��+ _' � 4 �.',�F .w��. � �� %'�l+e�ML��:�y�i��v�C� "f �R`,1/�� ^t� f:.%r.. ,IK� {;}�. ..,� � �.._ .�r .�. . ' �. i-��.1 �,��..S..�r�.�Ar�' .� ��1yt � _ � 1 > ¢¢�� y' 1w- .. � ' _ �"_ �a.Eff __Y�_ �.1T.�3� �L � � j • . � 'h .��' ' � L,�� y�T �+t w, iL . .�� ae�..� � 4 , # i . � pfif i i �:' �i� � • L�, Y � K. ��' �� , .-� ; '. � { "#' . f � _ f �� ,'' a. �,-, 4 � 1. �� i,f - i ; ��' + 1! •� } "' �� .x. s �`�s �.t"�j.�. r. ti� .. � , �:, f �� ! � � i la ��' ` � _ �': � 4'' � � . . '6 � �'r � } .�% 4 ��i€ � , � �' .F �� ..�a �' "A's�' ?.� -, .�. 4f� d _ �y.4 � + =;,�np„� �t" `Y � f's . } !� ^ �'� i�' ��rµ ' \ rs ��'• �� ` t� `�'� � !�'�t� . `� . .. C# "t's�i+ _ .. �a4c .y� '� ' Y� -� �� .. � . � D ��''� .,r t �h�t� . � � �• � � :;�+�° . �a� � �� "y; � . � '�,'�.� ..: � � . . 7 � � �f T J ,�' �.."� a t ; � ., � �- � .. 'i S - Y �_ � '. �+ ^� ' � �' �� - �gg �% ', 1 _. � ti �w� � , � . . � ' . . g - � . :s� �.._ � �. � � � t.a . ..e� .. sr s ' e � r; ,. -t t •_' 4 "�i v� '•�,�:i ��.�j ��' • b� r � i� � r .� �,;_ r ,� ��- � �" . � . �"�,; � y ` �`� ,� - t : �`` � • -_ �) �� 1y& j ` '� �� ' ��~ �yy, 5 � '.j�' � 'I ;f '� ��1. •,� i4 � 'x' �r +.T - .�. �-� � v�-is ;r. : .^ T�r i , p " . �/ y.. • y �+ '-. _ - �� t� :. ,G:'� ' �, !r'' �,,dd '�E �''�� i s _ ;� t ' a :� ` � z . � ' � . - . .,t s�A� ` - : �� 'r...�� -��Y7E � ' , ti. .� � . �� ,� �r ,. > . _ � �.; � , :� �� - �� < � : -� , � (''y � - � - ?... o� >+i - fi 'F� - � � i `��l�' �� ' � `'''4 -•- . ._. '_ . �` .. � � a � 'p�' c-s �) = , . � )r,, • t- � t s¢ ` °� 3 �'�+ ;`"_ .' „� � 7t� _ �'' �+4� .I�i.. .J �1 P� ao"s�� "�"t^��"+� J = '� �•'t _ ` /r .� '�. c''!t '� ' dc' �a �` � '2 . �� .��y3z sY�y�' ��t>'��'�r-"�,a�°� � �*: � ti .c `2; �. s j i..+ j a�� , �,� . �..� s�, � ��Y s s �. `'X2f� . � .. - ' ' - . . � 1�'r'+.y._S„a.�: � ��..� . t' . :3 �� ' . .. . w r w�'. ' i�+' �� . � ? ...�5':�. • .< �c y S' . . .,s a.. r" �-c� jv - ��:.s� �'t Y .r.�'��T � _,i - _ � �f �S "`t- '.` � - ii�li�r. � �..��. _ ��. s��U� �.::�-;�: =L�.c 11 G ."°",••'•` C. E. C O U L T E R S P#84-11 "•" "° �J�'tii �� •��Y �J��/�� ,�. `oT� ��NO suQ�E�oR Cheryl Mischurski ��w�twp�� O�OG��r.i� r�N�ti6 M[Gii7[A�O UtiOtA L�Ybi O� iT�t� O� Y.hN(SO�• •dt�C�K - a�CttiND �• O�L '��1C�s O• C'�• O• r h\��ro�`� �jpp �rNDw�E •vE SO M�NNEAPOl15 e h1iNN TArLOR a•03�0 1 �� N �(",_,;j� �� j `t . �a7' �LTbtPOi�f Ct[tlil[Aft ��;.:� _ , ------ 6�.0-- -_ 3G,0 34.0 � � N T � � I ` � � �/ ,. � � •' �Z I �� --� n'_ oc O � � � `•� i _� ¢----30 - :� z2' '' .>. ' I � M? �. J _ _� .i. � � " - - �i.Ci _. . — �- b. � �.�� ' � • f.�.� �t',� .��".� � � �� = L� � � fn �-S-F N : �e�i �rp:�OSed �a✓'�q� a �3 1 y� �� r ��%Y��Q p7��G ��: � r� =�•�11�:E� �� I i�ereb}- cer tify that t:le aboce i� a truc and correct plat of a sur•.��•.� oi : Lot� 47 ar.d 4R, °lock 11, Spring Eroo�c Park, Anoxa Count.�, Minnesota. As surveyed b� r;le this 20th da}• of Augus:. 190� A.D. / %� / .r.... Si ned � ; ��-, , .�, .�--�-� 7 � � i Minneso�a Reaistration No. 2�6� ________ _� _ � - �--- — 0 1 11 H CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 12, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabel called the June 12, 1984, Appeals Comnission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Pat Gabel, Alex Barna, Jim Plemel, Jean Gerou, Donald Betzold Members Absent: None Others Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley Rhoda M. Sprang, 4600 West 78th St., Mpls. 55435 John W. Hitchcock, 9516 Tyler St. N.E., Blaine See attached list APPROVAL OF MAY 29, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, TD APPROVE THE MAY 29� 1989� APPEALS G10MMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSQN GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. RE EST FOR VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 214 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO c rt r nr e rnrr rTnun�►.�r r�r►.� rnn►� en cI� �T /l A4 �ft C . v� � in� av�in rr�vr�ni I L11\L� vn �.v� �v nv�• �v�� J JVN✓a.a,++..�. �..+��.+��. .+� THE SAP1E BEING 6485 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E. Request y ho a M. Sprang, 4600 West 78t Street� inneapo is, n. 55455). MOTICYJ BY 1NR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY 1NR. PLEl�L, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSGIN GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:3Z P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REP4RT 6485 East River Road N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: CPr_tjnn ?_1a.11.26 reouires a maximum size of eiahtv (80) sa��rP fPPt in area for a free-standing sign. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and excessive use of signs in cormiercial areas. 11 I APPEALS C0�'�NISSION MEETIWG, JUNE 12, 1984 � PAGE 2 Section 214.11.2E requires a minimum distance of ten (IO) feet between a free-standing sign and any property line or driveway. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and to maintain a landscaping strip between properties. 8. STATED HARDSHIP: "Existing sign was grandfathered in. It lost grandfather clause exception when sign was damaged over 50 percent due to wind damage." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The original 8' x 4' message center was erected on June 9, 1976. This sign was damaged by a storm and allowed to be repaired in July 1983. A storm this spring again damaged the sign and since it was greater than 50 percent damaged, the property owners were told they could not replace the sign without a variance. The existing pylon sign has a total of 66 sauare feet and approval of these variances would raise this total to 98; square feet, with the sign placement only 1 foot off ti�e south property line and 7 1/2 feet off the west property line. Mr. Clark stated the Gor.unissioners had some pictures of the site as it is today, along with an aerial photo, and a picture showing both signs last fall before the message center sign was damaged. Ms. Gabel asked the petitioner to explain this request. Ms. Rhoda Sprang stated they are asking to replace the sign that was there with an il7uminating sign on a meta7 pylon. She stated there is already a base on the property on which the sign would be erected by a professional sign erector. It will be no larger than the sign that was blown down and will be much more attracitve. Ms. Gabel asked what the message cenier had been used for in the past. Ms. Sprang stated Mr. John Swingdort, the lessee of the property, has used it to advertise merchandise in his store, has advertised the open air church, _ congratulations to graduates, etc., anything that pertains either to his -^ merchandise or participation in the comnunity. Mr. Betzold stated that in looking at the really understand what the hardship was. sign was destroyed, they wanted to replace stated hardship, he could not Was the hardship that because the it with a similar sign? Ms. Sprang stated, yes, that was their intent. She stated that as a business- man in the community, Mr. Swingdorf needed a certain amount of advertising space. He has had this space for a period of l years at this location. She 11J APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 12, 1984 ____ __ PAGE 3 stated they are not allowed under the sign ordinance to use the free-standing swing signs to advertise that are avai]able and used in some conunnunities. Mr. Barna stated he could attest to seeing 49'er Days advertising on this sign for the last couple of years. Mr. Swingdorf does not have his building plastered with a lot of advertising. Ms. Sprang stated Mr. Swingdorf is quite a civic minded person. Mr. Swingdorf runs a very clean, respectable business. M�O'1'IQl BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY 1HR. BARNA, TD CLOSE TXE PUBLIC XEI.RING. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CZASED AT 7:45 P.l�i. Mr. Plemel stated he has driven by this station many times, and he did not think this sign has been an eyesore in the past. He stated he would be in favor of the vari ance. �� Mr. Barna stated he not that visible to a purpose as far as lot was excessively of an overage. did not think the sign was an eyesore. Actually, it was northbound traffic and for southbound traffic it served advertising for the store itself. He did not think this signed, and 18 sq, ft, over existing code was not that much Ms. Gerou stated that since tfiere was already a 5` x 10' "Spur" sign and a 4' x 4' price sign, was there really a need for another 4' x 8' sign? She was thinking of the Union 76 station where the Appeals Comnission denied a similar request. Mr. Betzold stated he also recalled that example. The Union 76 station made the same pitch that they had products to advertise and messages to convey, and the Appeals Comnission denied that request stating the code. Ms. Gabel stated that was part of the reason for the ciause in the code that if something has been grandfathered in and is more than 50% damaged, a variance is needed. It gives the City an opportunity to re-examine things and bring things into compliance that are out of code. She stated that, as Ms. Gerou and Mr. Betzold had mentioned, there is some history for this. The Appeals Comnission did deny similar requests for lfnion Oil and Western. She stated _ everyone wants more space to advertise, but there is a limit and a reason for -� the code. She stated she was not in favor of this variance for those reasons. Ms. Sprang stated that with regard to the Western Station, it is a company- operated station, owned and operated by the corporation. In this case, Mr. Swingdorf is an individual businessman. His family depends on that station for their 1ive7ihood. He is at a competitive disadvantage with a company that operates a chain of stations. uK APPEALS CON�IISSION MEETING, JUNE 12, 1984 ____ PAGE 4 Ms. Gabel stated the problem the Comnission runs into is that if they grant one of these requests, it then sets a precedent for other people to come in with similar requests. She stated they understand that people need to advertise to remain in business, and they are not unsympathetic to that; however, the Commission does have a responsibility to the carmunity to make sure there is not a proliferation of these kinds of signs. 1NOTIDN BY !►�2. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, � REC0IHMEND TO CZTY COUNCZL DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 214 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO INCREASE TNE SIZE OF A FREE STANDING SIGN FROM 80 SQUARE FEET TO !98 SQUARE FEETj T�O REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 7 1/2 FEET OFF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND TO REDUCE TXE REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 3 FEET OFF THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE� �V LOT 10� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISIQN NUMBER 23� THE SAME BEING 6485 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE� BETZOLD� GABEL, AND GEROU VOTING AYE� PLEMEL AND BARNA VOTZNG NAY� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECIARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Gabel stated this request would go to City Council on July 2. 2. REQUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO . . .� . ., $ RT F , DI S S , PPI .. equest y o n .�tc coc�, y er reet .., aine, Mn. 55434 MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY l�t. PLEMEL� Rt� OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:55 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 953 Mississippi Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERUED BY REQUIREMENT: '' Section 205.07.3D.1 requires a front yard depth of not less than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also the aesthetic consideration of the adjoining neighbor to the rear who has frontage along the side street, to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. 11 L APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 12, 1984 PAGE 5 Section 205.07.3D.3 requires a rear yard depth of not less than 25 percent of the lot depth, with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. Section 205.OA.56 requires any accessory buildings to be placed in the rear or side yard only. Public purpose served by this requirement is to limit visual encroachment into neighboring sight lines and to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas adjacent to public right-of-ways. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "The structures already exist but if the proposed lot sp7it is approved, variances are necessary to make the structures legal, nonconforming buildings." C. ADMINISTRATIYE STAFF REVIEW: The present lot is 168.94 feet by 111.35 feet, located on the northwest corner of Mississippi Street and Oakley Drive, with the frontage on Mississippi Street. The applicant proposes to split off the southerly 84 feet to make a bui]dable site fronting Oakley Drive. The existing house is set back 121 feet from the front property line (Mississippi Street). If the lot split is approved, the existing house will then front on Oakley Street. This will res�lt in the following variances being needed: (1) Front yard setback of 25 feet versus required 35 feet; (2) Rear yard setback of 21 feet versus requires 27.8 feet; (3) Encroachment of accessory building (detached garage) into required front yard. If the Board's decision is to grant this request, the staff would suggest that the following conditions be met: (lj The existing house change its address to Oakley Drive; (2) If the existing garage ever needs replacing, that it be moved from the front yard. _ Ms. Gabel stated this item was before the Planning Commission twice. It was -- tabled the first time because it came to the Planning Comnission as a lot split with a request for variances. Both she and Ms. Schnabel, Chairwoman of the Planning Commission, could not recall a lot split being granted with variances, primarily because there is a public hearing involved with variances and there is not a public hearing with a lot split. Ms. Gabel stated the ]ot split was tabled with a request from the Planning Comnission that further research be done. Last week, the Planning Commission approved the lot split on a 3-2 vote with some stipulations. One stipulation 11 M APPEALS CONMISSION MEETING, JUNE 12, 1984 __ PAGE 6 was based on the approval of the variances by the Appeals Commission, and another stipulation was that the existing garage be moved from its present location to a location south of the existing house, so there would not be a garage in front of a house. Mr. Clark stated three variances were being requested. However, as Ms. Gabel had stated, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split with the stipulation that the garage be relocated from the front to the south of the house, between the house and the lot line. If that were to be done, it would result in the need for only one variance and that was for the rear yard between the house and the westerly property line from 28.7 ft. to 21 ft. Ms. Gabel stated one of the reasons she voted against the lot split at the Planning Comnission was because of the garage being in the front yard. Other reasons were there would be no need for variances if there was no lot split and because of the deep setbacks of 50+ ft. along Mississippi St. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Nitchcock if he had any comnents to make regarding his proposal. Mr. Hitchcock stated he had nothing to add at this time. He stated he had a blueprint of the house he proposed to build in the new lot if the lot split and variances were approved. Chairperson Gabel declared a 5-minute recess in order for the people in the audience to have a chance to look at the blueprint. Ms.Gabel asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to make any comments or ask any questions regarding this request for variances. Mr. Peter Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, stated he lived across the street. He stated the idea of the type of home that would be constructed with a tuck- under garage was out of character for this neighborhood. He stated the homes along there all have a setback of around 100 ft., and he did not think a house should be put in on that corner. The house would be closer to Mississippi St. than Oakley Drive. Mr. Hilary Mayers, 969 Mississippi St., stated his house was set back 95 ft. from Mississippi. He stated something should be done about the existing garage before anything else was done. - Ms. Barb Tauer, 6534 Oakley Drive, stated she lived two houses to the north. No matter where the existing garage is placed, they are going to look at the side of a house unless Mr. Hitchcock remodels the house and puts in a door on the east side of the house. Mr. Jim Tauer, 6534 Oakley Drive, stated if the garage was removed, there would be plenty of setback, but the house should be remodeled and upgraded so it looked like a house that faces Oakley Drive. 11 N APPEALS CONP'1ISSION MEETING, JUNE 12, 1984 PAGE 7 Mr. Ed Berntson, 925 Mississippi St., stated that at the time he built here, these houses were set back 100 ft. from the street so there would be a nice frontage. That 100 ft. setback runs from Able St. to Highway 65. He would be opposed to any development ahead of that building line from Able St. to Highway 65 as being out of compliance with the existing properties on Mississippi St. Mr. Wayne Brodal, 93] Mississippi St., stated he really opposed having a house on the corner of Mississippi St. and Oakley Drive because it would make every- thing look cluttered in that corner. Mr. Tim Gustafson, 935 Mississippi St., stated his house was the closest one to Mississippi St., and in the future he planned to lift his house and move it back. He stated he bought his home because of the deep setback. He stated if the new house was built on the corner, he would be looking at someone's back yard, rather than down Mississippi St. He did not want to see a house go in on that corner. Mr. Hitchcock stated that based on past experience, was he asking for an unreasonable rear yard variance? Ms. Gabel stated she could not really answer that. She stated she has been on the Commission for a long time, and she has not seen anything that is comparab7e to this particular item. It was unique in that the lot split created the need for the variances. It was unique because of the 50-100 ft. setbacks along Mississippi St. The Commission has to look at each situation individually. Mr. Barna stated it would not be unique of Mr. Hitchcock already owned the property and wanted to put an addition onto the back of the house and for that reason requested a variance. What they are finding here is that the petitioner is creating the need for the variance by splitting the lot, so technically there is no hardship, and the Appeals Comnission has to base its decision on the hardship. Mr. Hitchcock stated he was creating one problem, but he felt he was also cleaning up another problem in terms of the appearance of the property now from Oakley Drive. Some people oppose the building onifie corner of Oakley and Mississippi. At the Planning Comnission meeting, he made the statement that at some time in the future, because of the lack of land in Fridley, there will be other people coming in for similar requests. 1�IDTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO CLOSE TXE PUBLIC XEARING. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TfiE PUBLIC AEARING CIASED AT 8:30 P.M. Mr. Betzold stated this particular area was developed in a certain way, and it is going to remain this way for a long time. The houses that exist there now are going to remain in the same position. To grant the variances for the purposes of the lot split would significantly alter this particular block. 11 0 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 12, 1984 PAGE 8 Mr. Betzold stated the neighbors have expressed their concerns. They all have a certain amount of pride and enjoyment in the way their property is situated now. The approval of the lot split and variances would very drastica7ly affect them. He stated he did not think it would be in the best interests of the neighborhood to grant the variances and allow the lot split. Mr. Barna stated he would definitely be opposed to the garage in the front yard and the front yard variance. The rear yard variance was the on7y variance he could see as a viable variance except for the fact that it is self-created, and there is no hardship. Under the rules set up for the Cortmission, they are required to find a reasonable cause for the variance, and he could see nothing here that was not self-created. It is strictly a speculation situation, and with the lot split not there, the variance would not be required. He would have to vote against all three variances. Ms. Gerou stated she could see no hardship. The house that would be built on the corner of Mississippi and Oakley was not consistent with the neighbor- hood, and she thought it would be an eyesore. Mr. Plemel stated he agreed with all that had been said. This is a unique , area with the large setbacks, older homes, and nice trees. It is something _- different in Fridley, and he liked to think they still had room for that kind of uniqueness. He stated he felt the neighbors had some valid objections. He stated the existing garage was a problem, but moving it would create other problems. He stated he would vote against the variances. Ms. Gabel stated she felt the variances were brought on by the lot split. There was no question that the hardship was self-imposed, and she did think the Comnission had a responsibility to the integrity of this neighbor- hood that have 50+ ft.setbacks in their front yards.She did not disagree with Mr. Hitchcock that because of the value of land here, these things may be happening in the future, but for now, they have a responsibility to live up to the expectations of the community. At this point in time, she did not see this as something the comnunity necessarily desired, and she would be opposed to the variances. MOTION BY 1�II2. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY !rlS. GERDU, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT T1� CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 27.8 FT. TO 21 FT., AND REDUCE _ THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FT. T�D 25 FT. , AND TD ALIAW A DETACXED - ACCESSORY BUILDING TO BE CHANGED ON THIS PROPERTY� TNE VARIANCES ARE REQUIRED BECAUSE OF A LOT SPLIT REQUEST� WHICX CHANGES THE FRONT AND REAR PROPERTY LINES ON PART OF LOT 8 H� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 21� THE SA1� BEING 953 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. UPQN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE 1NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated this item would go to the City Council on July 2 because of the 7ot split involved and some of the things that have happened. The City Council will have final action on the lot split request and request for variances. 11 P APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 12 L 1984 �� ____ PAGE 9 ADJOURNMENT: 1�IOTION BY rlS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO AATOURN THE MEETING. iIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSQN GABEL DECLARED THE JUNE I2� I984, APPEAIS COMMISSION !►�ETING AA70URNED AT 8:40 P.Pl. Respectfully su mitted, t � l y e Saba ' Recording Secretary B i . . __. . �i a . . __ _ _ -- - --- -- - � n%�� Y---- - . - -- — ---- --�- -- - -----------.--. - --- - ----- - - __ �----- ____ _ _ __ - ` ��f - �' _ - . .�„ . +� �-�-. -- - -- - --- -- - -. - ---- . _ . --- --- _ - - -- - �, _ .. . _ - - �` �- -- - - - - -- - - -- �S-3 y o.�K � ,Dn- � �� -- - - - �s3� � . . `��`J ��, - - - . _ _ _ 96 9 `mus�� .�t. n ..� . 1�� . - - - - �5.3 �- �� f��r � ,� . � _ _ --- �S3 s' � - - G�� N,-/ati �u �.�s _ 9�9 �,�ss. 5f. ti� i cc �•to P B�ar�- 6's.�c. o,o,�� y.D R �. . �ry , � G �fs'� %�-�- �� a,, io o � r� da�.�.� . s�- `- _ _ _ 9�s-f� �`Yl�f �°.�� J . � -�if� �c.� � 0 � � _ - - - 9.�3 y?uaa . �. M r w ; �L i�� . �LiC/ - `� � �..�� _ _ �.�:.�_----- - . - - - - .: �. � �'�/ �3\ 9 �s� 9 3�S /�,fS . ��i �� . �;SS. � � � s �/�' , �� • \ g` �� ' r s' ir `� ... v � �. •• , -- 4 - �� / . . ' j `� '' � � • 'M � ° o ` � 11 R E �"'rr"� � � �,�► y� � b � ! � SO � � � � : L , 2a , - �: • �, !'� �,�IC -� , � + •�• 1 , =�8 ;�' , i � •�` '• � �\ e t N �;. � / \ � � � • � � - '�, : � ';, �, � s�� ,s'�� * 0� ��. � � � S1�` .. �•• 10 � 1 R :� � �i ~ ��" '�i ' � �i" � � 7 � � � ,� {t 1� �i �Z � . ,. ' , _ . l'1 c ��- ' I�s.r � _ " i� ' ` � � � �%� �� ` `�S � ;�~� •d� `� • . . �•= ;; :�.• � Z�► :, Q � �` 9D��;,t � .,,. . ? I,bq E �rs. : � . � �� O� • � M � � � '� r+is. � `�1�' N �, � , ` "ly r � '�` SPRANG . �s a, Q�� Ci � � � � . � 4 4 s� � , �R�� ' c, . .� s �S j0 � 1 � � � 1 ��O \ � • ` � • � � �_ � � tR�6 �;; ��►f4� �3 � � � �, C� � �s�o � , ✓i .� i �' f� �j, +OM*,s� • I ir vt ` • ♦ �,i �/�T � � / � , � G % !" 4� � V r �t �i = N � . ' .� ��p� �5 M , \ ., � '�� •�•�si'_,: � � � 1 ,_. .. � � �. � "� �•� � � "� �- .. �,-� --l-�� C.� N0. 6� ��$$�PPi �: . ' � ' . � � �t � `� ✓ s � . � . � ' '""1 (_..._._. RX� � _ , .�`� � ►, ; ,� :;; � ts ,'' ; - �,+�("��; , L: � '` ,� � � � � ; � n+� . M p ♦ �� /� - � � � , �,, {.- +� ; • • � �� A ,' J ��s� �� '�� . 3 ' -� . � � �4°��' _ `; . . • � , �/ � � � • � T � 'Y � • A0�' rti � ' +_��,,� ��e •�C `i•T-,-- _' � �0 ��'1 j � � �'"r�E''lW'°' �� ' _ ' ., �' � � ' 3 i4 . � . ,�'', w� -' � • � ;:,�';',. �,�' �'' r ' ..CO `4�, � .,. , . �s� � _ `4S4 � ��. N j -1. �30 < ' � • , �'"!' � � ,,,,r� `4 -� �, �, � '' � :.�.: , �4�Y . � 7 -._ � , ' • ' �.' : • .� �4 � � j�- -�`� `, ' ' . . � ~ �� t �� 28 ��'"`� Is �' , � i'' •'• _ � '� � � 4 TH � •v...r. ./ � _ � ! , � •. '. k _' , , j„ t•�" 1�t� j sr► �� r�!''' � ' US � � r � ,- , � , � ,� � - , r � �' �� r�' s ► �I •� ' � ��3 N � • � � �• � • �+ys � � : , � � � ' � � ��1 ' ♦ �' � • ,i � I " l � � � j1�� ► _� �"� —��1 / Ir9� � ' f �� I L� `t � . , -� ,�,t�- ! 1 �. � i R: �� 1/1 , 141 �� 1 � � �, � ��} I f � �� C . . � � � N� I� A� M`_ .} I � � � J i�l�, V � Il.s ; N� ( . 1� .• � � �T _ � �, N ; 1r�. �---�� . _�1� � -lf:�. � ' 0 � � — ` - T , ' ' 10 � ,� Ro � o , , � . s `�� ; `y : . � _ ,� .. .- . • �� v� i � F 'r J �•� ' �' - '� r' •+ . '•` -`� +1 '� - ... �� :; ..- �9 � ti..q,a `.. ; �'� . � L ,.r - � � �, . ".. . :!' , �V � 11 S �� . , � � �� : �ww .. � � .� . . � �x :, • � �� ' r �L .ti�. '� ' ' � .•r ..i ;-} � � � �` �,'•�,� . � ,'l��31 � Ti�:�'�f. ��: r"d �. 3} �� i7�� ` 1 f _ �.;� r !i ,+. �� V � •r y •' + , ?f,, • •, r � . `• . _ �►' a ��w a , . + � �i �' i'. r� f r ' �+ . . � i � i y' . ..��'' .!t .�., . • i r �Y. � �p � .i,• ; • �t+ • .., :.'�t, ' �!, ` - ♦ _ � .. �." � .E ,�' . • `� �`; �` .� .iS T �_ , ^r.� ' �+ �Y � . � •1 { \ � �. _� 3� � • R � :. . .�' -"�"�� 71�. � ,��► � #.�:i; ,� =s_. .�'�_ �:. : . '.� ,; _�,� � "'.` j� � . .. .� � 1 ,. ' � . "� " � 4 • , ;� � `�'��ve' • � i. �, :• ..� . `. '°aa �,:''• �,,:' . ��' .:�� - � ; r 3'*': � �� , . • , _ • SP N ... �;'�t � : �-� . �� "+�"'^� � " � -""r �• t � �^ r,y ta C •� �� -•...� �... .: + rt. . , .� .�!_ .._ .. ��.y i��'r�''�" : s' '�C..�x�R-'"'•�g�,�'-!?�'�.�'.X•JR +w�i �` • s � i-:l c��-.r �-� k,T � a !; , ,� ;J- ��it�nM Y ' ,_ .` -. �' � �� ,� �`'�i�+�r� 11�-� . �'•`�.iF'�"i.33'��.��? Cy► ��'�'��„�*,�y`"�'� •� .,, -��"�, .t �0, y) �.t��• �� .r 1. ��y,�,�. 2. :`..�� ` ��,.�..�' ��"'L� �i.�'%�'.� �. .r� i Mly. I�i��f..� :�C'•� i �� .�' � � ��.. -. . P . _. _ .�• t.,w� . � . � . .. ��K. �...�, � ..��:,�t _�. .: .;, � ',.',.�:. ��:i; :;�r :-.. � '�,. l r:- � y' � . �.,.... � A ' Y 1 � ' iki: w "�� . � ♦ �,y�� ►'' _ �� ' .. - :�: . ,� •- •- ' �`y - r ' � - ,tr�'' d.�£ �ti` :..�. � ,,�. ,, . .,,. .., M '� ,. c� . � , � .t. • , .,,r:ii t'� , �+ir: -..�.. �. '� � � .y � ^ . •� 1 �� t. �Gi' _+ � � �` ;,y '� xS�.�3 • -#=. � � ..' ; �.. '� ''�� ''� ti_x+ � � w�A :r _ ,� . � �' ?'�, � . ` � �� - � ,. > . �;,' ' j' • ��: _ f <�,: �T .� ..3 t . � . � c. �r� � � `e � J t� . . �.� :� .a� � ` ,. e° � � ��. �'�i`�� '/�(/ �) .. '�'� � �P } �.� �� ,i _ `, l � ' � ��- �+.�.;�}. V �.'.' : � • ..� ��, � � : r' � � i`,� � < ,;;� � '.� � � �„ +s � -'�' �� ',.;� ; 4, ,� , . i ; . � r;: � ' ' �.,5; ' .• .'�► i � . . 4 �. s, ir .:� :;{ .�. ., . � . ' �, �j . �, � ., � �►�, � 1 y �• �.`? .. +t � �» '�. T ; �- .r'7( �it�,;� ��.� � i � �. ' • ;�;� � . ti ,•. , �.� � � "�: �i t�; �� . �'' _ � .• �. .�= � . .i .� _ N r = , .r• � �� ' ��' �, (!. . - gt �i,'4, �. ,. :'� k� +� • ` �� .+� x , ..' ,' : ° .� �"�. - !, :, �' ��, � " � .. �., ' �i'.: („ �- �� • . � •v .�r,� L• ,�: -k ,,��,` . ��j�"A�♦�, ..�� '\ �/� •, �y• f w,1. � •� �� '3 sY�lr ��l�•. �� r �` � � r°;,�.:.�, �• ', _ � • i �� -�• ..:;,�� 'w�*- ,'�' �2 � . s • , , � tr�� Si� , {i � -y " ' ;� ' '�. `'+:. ��f� + y � ' �ix.1 .� . ,. •�` O �t ` • . ! .. '` t' ti •��', . /. '��4 _T� �� . !j.' .1 , a . , ► � . '�, �� :, .:1- �. � .� . ,'. . �� '"�'►' - r _ . .. ,, �. "..� , .: � � �' -; ! � CL � � � �'# v,� � .,�� _ rM�t � } � �!. ' . . '� . F' �' �. � '"r'� X�y � .' �' � �' � r `"� � - � � s �. � .. � 7eW' / . � `', s. .'�'. S "'��. +� - "��. - � � : r _ �A s • i f � ,+ 1C. . �,� l ' . '� '� �` � ,t S� • . ''�/ ,C ,. � * ;,�� - , �s � � �t . . � j ;,�� _ ';'� ►i f '�'� � - _� z.- _-� ,,. "�� / � �<.�-�,�� .- L. r 3 ' • � � . � , y, . ,. _ , �"� � �.,.;�•� �.. � � '��. � .+� - � ... - �� '+ -J . � R� �' - l'' ._ . } �� ,yyi . � t . � �lsS1 � � 1"')� +� ` � j"k�'� � � ` � � t!°4 � - �'� � �'�.�{•� t�.'�}�. 'e . �, . _ . ,, . , T' t- � �. i � ` �y � �; � .� �. , • �.° • �. `� �4 � � ,� ' ' �= :* fi � �� t ' � � �+� "' �yi ��'�.�,��y�i t * �� t�,• •� ' r��fi �-�"' � �; �i�jX � � 1 �� k R , ' . . ?�s'.S� i i '} j I .r • ;r- � � •t :L �'' t �; t. !: � � �I�',,,� { � � .� �� . � +� � rc• ` �'�•'� �', ••� 4' �' yt .. J� 4`. - ; .�� ,, , . .� - � )� � . .1, w � ��'�` �%.. �!. . .r.n, '.[r �r � y•h. � „� ( �- _ .'r i�e�� ;� .3 'L J� .• �* .y� �. , " ',.r �4 � � c• s. 'Y t .1►-'- i•� , .a►� ..i+ r ' . "'' ' � T _j 4 -� 1. - _ :�.�' J . .�`Y . l� •. � � , . � s �r. �s 3 �- ,\ . A+r C ,� ' Y . S' ,r t� � ' ? �- `, �,�� -z �`�� y; - -� y`� � ' , •�,,,� 1 �...� .—�,. . = j . _:, _ . - � �� .... s .� �,- :- ��f .- �� -..: s :� . �-: : �-x � ; �.:�[•� t - �� -- _ �� -. = ri' � �"i:�`�, ��` 4� �� il -i t i� -xLT� "+. . p� + .� � ''t. . .� • �A �' Vt. �y '�'= f � �.�. E r r - , ^ ''� • �� - �► �''t : ° �'�'��. " i i ,'� l � • • � . ��. . •�� . . s ;, �, . . r .t`'�' .. - , 'y�� \ i� �. • . ' � y_�y: '- _ _= j . �,\ ti_ �� . _ -' i_�.. t • ' � • 3 � '� Ja .:r �' �" � . �� _'� ��_ ' ��F ��.�.�� : y'� r ' 4' ; - � � ' " i � '� ''� � �i� ��^'�S . . � 4;� g-� � . ' � . ' , . �� . . •J � ` . �s ♦ _ - �.. � . - � s: .. �` � Y' s v�i'.: � �4 Jf -+ 1 • „'�� ' `.Y' -'si �� ,�� .. t...w. �.'� �� -: :� Yt �� '�j.��L � �� %� r *�S`�• 1'� �A.t��i+ ,-,'T� •r ►�?�� J'y� - •�3=� _ �� "�t �R r ';�� iA �� i. i�q.`�~��j'sA 3. ,�!.�� . . . 1.• ��j• Y 4 � -'��i � �"�i �.� � �Z, ri . � � Y . , �' .rT.� ., .1 .a�� ti. � � � ��.� �� s � ��' ` ��,�''� ,�,� a i '.�-� `= t . 's . :3' ` " ��' . - !� - l,,' -'1t� c � � � �" • "t? -'R�' �� : E ��i � 0 Z V � 0 � Q �, o om , _,� �W mo �Q �W U� . --: � � ■.■.. ,� i � Vw ■..■. .■.. � � � z V a- � _ a _ a a � � � SPRANG 11 T r � -N � � •- Cp N � � C C� O � � • = � � . � r � vi 'n • O � � � � �C C•-'- � �.... s � � V � � � � � � N V � L ? � w � � � � -� ' C � ..�. -o � -� �D � � � E c� 3��m� .o 0 3� 3 0�� a +-. , +-� U n O C�� O� O� v� E X � -� a� � .N o�t',� �.o � -varo.o,��.��Q,� n� �; .t »� c o� '� �'� co • �O��vEY��c ��c� a� �* -- — � a� °' s .r��'�N�—m�-�� _ � a� � o = �n � n� ti° c� >, N� c.c�, �° N� `!� o- c� � c�n N � E� N �� F-L- � a�i E°a � c°�n cn Y E , � �, I � .�� - � 5 �OHN HITCHCOCK (.AT $PLIT �—OS • �► 1) �PROVAL QF VARIANCES CREATm BY LOT SPLIT� �SCHmULED �OR APPEALS JUNE ��. 1�) Z) F�(ISTING STRUCTURE �NOW FACING MISSISSIPPI) TO HAVE NEW ADDRESS ON OAKLEY AFTER LOT SPLIT. 3) SIGNm PARK FEE AGREEMENT FOR ONE NEW LOT� FEE TO BE $%SO� 4) LOT SPLIT TO BE REGISTERED N�ITH COUNTY IN A TIMELY MANNER. 5) EXISTING GARAGE �ACCESSORY BUILDING IN FRONT YARD) TO BE RELOCATm TO �I�E YARD IF IT IS TO BE REPIA�m OR SUBSTANTIAt1Y IMPROVED� ca �lJ% OF GARAGE REPI1aCEMENT COS7) � 6) OWNER TO SIGN LOT SPLIT Alm VARIANCE RE(aUESTS� 11 U 11 V : �LANNIN� COMMISSIO MEETING2 JUNE_6, 1984 PAGE NEED TO fd1�TERPR00F TO REQUIRED ELEVATIQN OF 8?S.?S !'T. THIS C1�NSIST OF 4id0 ADDITIDNAL CDURSES OF BLOCK QR 1'XE DSE OF WATE SIS�!'ANT WOOD. 2. STRUCTURE � ULD BE SECURELY 1WCHORED f+►ITH aA►CXOR BOLTS. 3. DRIVEWAY � C BE PAVED i�ITH CONCRETE OR ASPHALT !lATERIAL. I. GARAGE BE COJ�LETE SEPT. 2� 29Bd S. PETITIONER WIL� ELIMIN E COiNTINUING DUTDODR STORAGE a1ND CURBSIDE PARICIN� PROBIEKS. iIPON 11 VOICE VI�TE, ALL VOT NG AYE� CHAIRWOPlAN AB£L DECLARED TNE 1NOTION CARRIED UNANIPJOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this itein would go to City Council on 18. 2. TABLED: LOT SPLIT REQUEST,_L.S._�84-05,� BY JOHN HITCHCOCK: Split off the 3outherly 84 feet of Lot 8 H, Second Revisea Au itor s Su�division No. 21. to make a new building site at 953 Mississippi Street N.E. (Other lot will be changed to 6530 Oakley Drive N.E. M.OTION BY 1�JR. KQNDRICK� SECONDED BY PLS. GABEL� TO REMDVE ZS #�80-OS FROM TXE TABLE. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTIOPI CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. Mr. Robinson stated they still need the owner's signature on the lot split request. and the owner, Ron Miller, was in the audience. Mr. Robinson stated the property in question was located on Mississippi St. west of Oakley Drive. It was a corner lot. Previously, the northerly 81 ft. had been split off, and at this time the petitioner was asking that the southerly 84 ft. be split off. This lot is presently built on and the house faces Mississippi St. Mr. Robinson stated one of the problems expressed by the Flanning Conmission at their last meeting was the variance situation. He stated three variances are scheduled to go to the Appeals Commission on June 12. The lot split will create a new front yard for the existing house. Presently. in the front .yard there is an accessory garage building that would need a variance. Another variance would be that the front yard be 25 ft. versus 35 ft., and a variance = that the rear yard be 21 ft. iversus 27 ft. Mr. Robinson stated the proposed house on the new lot would front Oakley Dr. Mississippi St. then became the side yard, and 17.5 ft. would be the required setback. However, Staff was suggested that 30 ft. be provided. The adjacent house has a front yard setback from Mississippi of 110 ft. There are similar setbacks as they proceed westward to Jackson St. After Jackson St., the houses are closer to Mississippi. He stated the side of the proposed house would be on Mississippi and would not be consistent with the neighborhood. He stated Staff would recarunend the following stipulations if the lot split request is approved: 11 w � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JUNE 6, 1984____`_ PAGE 4 1. Approval of variances created by lot split (scheduled for Appeals Cam�ission on June 12) 2. Existing structure (now facing Mississippi) have�new address on Oakley Or. after lot split 3. Signed park fee agreement for one lot of 5750 4. L^t split to be registered with County prior to issua�ce of a building permit. October 15, 1984 is deadline to split 1985 taxes. 5. Existing garage (accessory building in front yard) to be relocated to side yard if it is to be replaced or substantially improved (at 50% of garage replacernent cost) 6. Owner to sign lot sp3it and variance requests Ms. Gabel stated she felt this was all inconsistent with the neighborhood. She could not remember any instance where a variance was granted so a garage could be put in front of a house. She stated the garage in front of the existing house was the biggest problem she had with this lot split. and she was not sure what could be done to alleviate that problem. Mr. Kondrick stated the house and garage are already there. and that will not change. The peo�le who build the new house are going to see the same thing. He stated he did not have.a problem with this request since the situa- tion is an existing situation. Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Mr. Kondrick, but he could also understand Ms. Gabel's point of view.of what this was doing to the neighborhood in general. All of a sudden they are allowing a garage to be in a front yard, and the City would be setting a precedent. Ms. Gabel stated she also felt they put some burden of proof back on the City if they grant this kind of a lot split, because this lot split does require variances. and this was not a variance she had ever seen before. It was not the kind of variance that comes because of the "lay of the land". Mr. Kondrick stated he would agree if they were talking about new construction. He stated he would consider the new proposed house more of a visual problem than the problem of the garage in front of the existing house. Ms. GaDel stated she thought the intitial problem started with the garage in front of the existing house, but then it was compounded by putting a new = house �n the corner of Mississippi and Oakley Dr. when the setbacks are as far back as they are in that area. Ms. Schnabel stated Ms. Gabel had a valid point in that the variances would �ot be necessary if the Planning Commission does not grant the lot split request. The City, in effect, is creating the variances that become necessary to be appealed. The variances are not something the petitioner is creating, but the City is creating them if it approves the lot split. Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioner or the owner of the property if they had any conruents to make. 11 X PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIt�6, JUNE 6, 1984 _ PAGE 5 Mr. Hitchcock stated he could see a probiem if they were proposing to con- struct an auxiliary builiing in the front yard--somethiny the neighborhood would be upset about. Ne was not sure what Ms. Gabel was objecting to. Ms. Gabel stated she was clearly concerned about Lhe garage in the front yard. She felt it was inconsistent with the Caoprehensive Plan and the total planning for the City. The visual impact is that people cannot see the ho�se from the street, only the garage. She stated her other concern was that the Planning Commission's granting of the lot split was what was creating the variances. If the Planning Commission does not grant the lot split, there is no need for the variances. What is the position of the Appeals Comnission in denying the variances when the City has granted the lot split? She stated she was very uncomfortable about granting the front yard variance for a garage in the front yard. Mr. Hitchcock asked if Ms. Gabel would be more willing to look at this if he moved the garage to the side of the house. Ms. Gabel stated� yes, she would be more willing to take a look at this if the garaqe was moved to the side of the house. Mr. Hitchcock stated he was not convinced that moving the garage was going to improve the looks of the property, but he would do whatever was necessary. Mr. Robinson stated that if the garage was moved, there would be quite a difference between the proposed house and the existing house. The petitioner might want to consider moving the proposed house back 5 ft. to make it more consistent with the existing house and the new house to the north on Oakley. Ms. Schnabel stated she was very reluctant to grant the lot split. She honeitly had a hard time visualizing a house going in on the corner of Mississippi and Oakley in front of all the rest of the homes in that two block area. She felt it would dramatically change the nature of the street. It was really inconsistent with the neighborhood. Mr. Hitchcock stated that considering the fact that they are in coniormance with the homes on Oakley Dr., could the Planning Comnission impose something that was stronger than the code? Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Commission can only make recorranendations = to the City Council. Then all the legalities have to be handled by the City Council who has legal counsel. The Planning Commission does not have that legal counsel. 7he Planning Comnission can only go by what the Zoning Code says which does not give them legal expertise. Mr. Hitchcock stated that because of the demand for land being rrhat it is, he believed that at some future time it was likely that this same kind of lot split would be proposed for the other side of the street on Oakley. If Fridley wants new construction, it is going to have to work with these types of things. 11Y , PLANNI��G COMMISSION MEETING,�JUNE 6, 1964 ' _ PAGE 6 Ms. Schnabel stated they did not know what was going to happen in the future. She agreed land was not easy to come by� but she still felt the Planning Comnission had an obligation to preserve the neighborhoods. Mr. Kondrick stated that because of the trees on the lot. he did not find this as objectionable as he would if it was up about two blocks. He stated he did feel this was the best use for the prcuerty as opposed to having nothing there. He would be in favor of the lot split. even though it was going to create some problems for the Appeals Comnission. However, fie would be in favor of a stipulation that the garage be moved to the side of the existing house. Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Mr. Kondrick. He stated this is a very unique area, and there is not a lot of conformance in that whole area. His main concern was the garage in front of the existing house. He would be in favor of the lot split with the stipulation that the garage be moved to the side of the existing house. Ms. Gabel stated they will be creating a"monster" if this lot split is granted and it the►� goes on to the Appeals Comnission. NOTION BY !!R. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY PlR. SABA, TD RECOM.MEND TO CITY COUNCZL APPkOVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. N84—O5, BY JOHN HITCXCOCK� TO SPLIT OFF 4ilE SDUTHERLY 84 FT. OF LOT B H� SECOND REVISED AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISIQN NO. 2I, TD MAKE A NEDT BUILDING SITE AT 953 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. (OTXER LOT WILL BE QXANGED lt� 6530 DA?'LEY DRIVE N.E.) � f+►ITf! THE FOLLOWING STIPUUITIDNSt I. 11PPROVAL OF VARIANCES CREATED BY LOT SPLIT ?. EXISTING STRUCTURE (NOW FP.CING PIISSISSIPPI ST.) TO NAVE JVEW ADDRESS OsIV DAKLEY AFTER LOT SPLIT 3. SIGNED PARK FEE AGREEI�NT FOR ONE NEW LOT OF 5750 d. LOT SPLIT T1D BE REGISTERED idITH TNE COUNTY PKIOR TO ISSU,�4NCE OF A BUILD- p,$j2MIT, OCTOBER I5, 1984 IS DEADLINE TD SPLIT 19B5 TAXES. 5. EXISTING GARAGE TO BE NOVED FROM PRESE:rT LOCATION TO A LOCATIDN SOUTX OF TXE PRESENT BOUSE ?XAT IS CONTI�UOUS WITH THE 20NING ORDIHANCE. 6. NEW NOUSE G1N THE NEW LOT '!1D BE SET BACK AN ADDITIGINAL 5 FT. TO 40 FT. (AS OPP0.SED TD 35 FT.j FROH OAKLEY DR., BASED UPQN W11ERE THE EXISTING GARAGE IS RELOCATED. UPON A VOICE VOTE, KONDRICIC, SABA, JWD 1HINTON, VOTING AYE, SCHNABEL AND GABEL — VOTING NAY, CFlAIRA'OMAN SCfINABEL DECLARED THE 170TION CARRIED. Ms. Schnabel stated the variances would go to the Appeals Cormiission on June 12. The lot split request and the variances would then go to the City Council in one package on July 2. . T: L. .#84-07, BY BRANDON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: Split oit�,�lo—Tc c 4, ity , one a f to Lot 4 and one half to Lot 6, to make two reside tial sites, the same h Place N.E. � I PLANNING COMMISSlON MEETING MAY 23 1984 ' PAGE 11 Z � MOTIDN 8Y MR. 5118A� SEC'aNDED DY IiDt. OQUIST� � CL05E !!lE PUBLIC BE1lRINC '� Sp MBO-09 9Y R�1l�lARD B. GREEN. Vp Yt�ICE VCTE,�LL WTING �YE� C�AIRNQKIW SCfJNABEL �CIARED Tf1E PUBL2C pEERRI CL0.SED AT d 12 P.M. NOTIOlV 8Y . 1CQNDRI � SEC�GWLIED 8Y 1�Gt. SalBA, TO REC10l�l1�ND r0 CI1'Y C�OUNCIL App�ROVAL OF SIDERATIAN OF A SPECIIIL [lSE PERPiTT, SP #8�-09 � SY RTCNARD E. GRE PER �SEC!'I� 205.15.1 � 3, D, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, r0 �Z.Lpf� A REPAIR G CE �N LOT L� DlACK 2� TARGET JIDDITION� THE S11J� BSING 765 53RD AVENIIE N.E. KITH TNE FOLLOWING STIPULATIG[�iSs 2. THERE BE AN ROVED L4NASCAPE PI.�N. 2, �1 �L�1vAGEABLE S MUST HE I�FT O�t+i THE E11ST SIDE OF THE LOT 1�1D (',JZEAT£R 4iiAlN 3s1: 3. IF BAD 50ILS ARE�'�i'D , PETITIONER MUST PROVTDE SDIL ALTERATION pLATV WHICN INCLUDES P CTIQN OF CAR WASX PROPERTY. I. PETITIONER MUST 11GREE �ID VE NO OUT'SYDE SZIDRJIGE OF C11R5 OR pARTS AT ANY TIJ�. \ S. REQUIRE THAT OPERATIQN XAlVAGE EIR USED OIL OR OTXER f1AZARDOUS MU�STE THROUGH JIFPRDPRIA� lfE/WS. 6� 11[V J1PpRDVED L1RaINAGE 1P\I.AN SE REQV D!�R DUILDING PEitPlIT. 7. SPECTJIL USE PERNZ'!' �• Z+��"D � TNL P LRTS' OWJVLR AhiD NO'l BE TRANFiRABLE WITHDUT 11PPROVAL OF THE Y DF FRIDLEY. UPON 11 VDICE VOTE� AI.L V+0'17NG JIYE\ CX1lIRh'Ul�1�lV SCKN't8E ECL UN CARRIED UNIWIPJOUSLY. \ Ms. Schnabel stated�the special use permit request, along w Mould go to City Council on June 4. �,\ (Mr. Oquist left the meeting at 8:45 P.M.) D THE MOTION the variances. � 4. LOT SPLIT RE�UEST• L.S. #84-OS 6Y JOHN HITCHCOCK: SQlit off the Southerly � ee� o Lot�F�. Secoi nd�evise u�tor s Sub ivision No. 21� the same �being 6530 Oakley Orive N.E. Mr. Robinson stated the lot in question is Zoned R-1. located on the corner of Oakley and Mississippi St. The present lot is 18,811 sq. ft. The petitioner is proposing to split off the southerly 86 ft. to create a new R-1 lot. Both new lots would be over the 9,000 sq. f t. needed. Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recortmend the following stipulations if : this lot split was approved: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The following variances for the existing structure be approved with the lot split: front yard - from 35 ft. to 25 ft. rea� yard - from 25 ft. to 21 ft. Require owner's signature on the lot split request Park fee on one new lot of sT50 Existing home to chan9e address from Mississippi St. to Oakley St. Lot split be recorded at the County. if approved. � 0 11 q� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 23 1984 PAGE 9 � Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Cortmission had a problem with the owner not petitioning for the lot split. The petitioner. Mr. John Mitchcock, stated he is under contract with the existing property owner to buy the lot. He stated he was sure this had happened with the northerly lot that was split off some time ago. At that time. the petitioner requested the ]ot split and was granted the lot split. Mr. Hitchcock stated there was a change in the lot split request. The 86 ft. should be changed to 84 ft. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Hitchcock if he had talked to any of the neighbors in the area across Oakley St. or west of the lot about the visual impact of putting a structure in front because it would De set further ahead of any other house in the immediate area. Mr. Hitchcock stated he has not talked to the neighbors across Oakley. The property owner to the west is the father of the person he is buying the lot from� and he was the only property owner he had talked to. Mr. Hitchcock stated when he discussed this with 8i11 Deblon� Mr. Deblon felt that since this house faced Oakley. it was applicable to the houses on Oakley. Ms. Schnabel stated she still had some problems with that house setting so far forward. even though it was an Oakley St, house, rather than a Mississippi St. house. � Ms. Gabel stated she had a problem with the variances being approved with the lot split. She did not think this had ever been done before with a lot split. Since it was a housekeeping type of thing� that might be the reason for it; but by not following the variance procedure. it eliminated the public hearing process whereby the neighbors would be notified of what was happening. Ms. Schnabel stated she saw the following problems with this lot split request: 1. The variance situation--granting the variances with the lot split. 2. Not having the actual owner on record with the lot split request. 3. The situation of the setback impact on Mississippi St. This should be checked out with respect to the setback requirements in the Zoning Ordinance or a legai opinion. Would this be setting a precedent? Ms. Schnabel sta±ed she realized the petitioner was anxious to move on this. but she thought possibly the Planning Carmission should table this request until their June 6th meeting When these problems can be clarified. Mr. Kondrick stated he agreed that tfiis request should be tabled until these questions are answered. t 11 EE PLANNII�G COMMISSION MEETIN6 MAY 23 1984 PAGE 10 Mr. Hitchcock stated he strongly objected to this. because of the fact that he had made himself available to do everything the Staff had requested. N�OTION BY lfR. JCQNDRSCK� SECANDED BY 1LS. GABEL� TD TABLE LOT BPLIT REQUEST� L.8 NBO-OS, BY JOXN NITCNCOCK, TO SPLIT OFF THE SOUTHERLY 80 iT. OF LOT IX� SECAND REVISED �UDI�R'S SUBDIVISIQN NO. ?1� TXE S� BEING 6530 OAKLEY DRIVE 1N.E. � i1NTIL THE FOLiOf�ZNG CQNCERNS G1N 8E C?.IIRIFIEDr I. THE VARIIWCE SITUATZQN i�ITX REGJIRD TD GRANTING YARIIWC�S WITN 4'HE LOT SPLST. 2. NOT dAYING THE 11CT�IAL OWNER OiV RECORD WSTN TliE LOT SPLIT REQUEST. 3. THE SETBACK II�ACT QN MISSISSIPPI ST. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING �YE� CH�IlifJOP1AN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE PIOTION CARRIED t1NANIMOUSLY. l0T SPLIT RE UESY: L.S. #�84-06 BY ANNETTE POESCHEL: Split the South . eet exce i�he or an excep es��'f.15 feet of South Half Lot 31, subjec to easement over South 30 feet) into two parcels to a11ow ze lot line for double bungalow, the same being 1571-1573 73rd Avenue N.E. Mr. Rob on stated his property was located to the north of 73rd Ave. and east Hayes St. The property is zoned R-3. The property is surrounded by a mixture f R-1 a d heavy industrial to the south. The existing lot ts 12.822 sq. ft. The pe itioner is proposing to build a double bungalow on the two split pa ls ith zero lot line. This �ets a11 the setback require- ments. He stated f would recommend the following stipulations: 1. Signed zero lot line ovenant (The City provides a standard agreement to the owners to pr good maintenance.) 2. Park fee of s150 on o e lot 3. Lot split be recorded with e County. Ms. Schnabel asked if this double b alow would be a one-owner building or would each half be sold of 7he petitioner. Ms. Annette oeschel. state the bungalow would have two different owners. She state She owns the cr erty now. She will be the � owner of one half, and her rtner will buy the her half. = NOTIQN HY ![R. SJlSA, SECQNDED lII2. NZELSON, 4C? RECO ND TO CITY COUNCIL �P RP �VAL OF LOT SPLIT REpUEST, L.S. �84-06, 1�D SPLIT T SOi1TX 138.I0 FEFT (EXCEPT THE NORTH 2/? 1W�7 EXCE T i�EST 92.75 FEET OF SOUT OF LOT 31, SUBJ�CT 41D E1LSEI�NT OVER SOfT1'H � FEET) INTO 4i00 PARCELS � I ZERO L04' LINE i�OR 1l D�UBLE BiINGALOiI, Tt1E A1� BEING 1572-25�3 73RD 1lVE JVi.B. UPQN 1l VDICB VDTE, ALL i►�'l7NG AYE` CNAIRW�MAN SG1fNABEL L�CI.�IRED TH OZ70N C/1RRIED iAd1WIMOUSLY. Mls. Schnabel stated this iten woul�d go to City Counci] on June 4. I / �ON ,� � ! � : �` ` r _ ' Y • �r � r � !10 1iM 9 � �8(io $ .. i . s, ; �a 'I <'o � 3' .� � � � ` 84�05 o Hi chc ck 11 �� !i � 9t i� � �o � � / 1 42 � � , O� �' . � �� 7 � ` �i4 � � • � �+ E � �� 9�1" 9a1p O: s918 i�,st irb�p . 8 1 Gt� � % 8 !' �� 'y � � S�+ � r� � � � � �o s � � ..,� 96� :� o - � -�� ;_ YO�, ':, s; 1Y,� �. z j � �� O i�� 4�0 . � 2 " -.. .� M � Q� , t. - � [` o � ' � 94 =• :� �•z � , ,� NA L, G 7 �0 o Nst �20 5 «,�_ � �► � /I ,� � O� 9 �� /3 � � 1!1 w �t N O _ � � � - /5 � J /f /i � � '� 9 1 -- ' �poa , ��3 � 12 ll /o � � � � �jl�,_'°°� O / 3' 2 �„ Z '', � ,953 Kt ,r so so �. �� _ - — ._ _ �� 7►•l � A� I1• lJ N'Ir � �_�� ,� —i.�i rI Q� "'�� --�-�' : " "—�.� ---� /t. ;=7�i ; rac� � -•r� w � • � .us .s+.« �....• �s..• sr.«• ' 3 : � � ' � � � 10! � t � I �' �'�s;�� • _ q ,r �36, � :�.1 �#. • • � � _._ • - � ,' ; _ !�!o �000 a �0 1 3 �C� _ I �, � ' �� i .r� sI «� • � � �% �� Yn fi � � � � �, �'� ; � • I� f i J � � = i ' Y AR��/lCo�' �'' Z . • � `LT� _ � \, .�� M. � x ot� los i �0 61 : , .� s ., .� � �. � ! �35 �� ~ �' �'�, . tpopl :�;� T AV. ME. � � G ` � � .r • � � � r � � � � i � �� ' �- �' � --- � --- � 6 E �' � ,�,�- �L z h - � , ,� W - � > �.t,. .� f,:.,�,5 , � V�' Z '� `♦' --- 6 C � ,. E - � � '�, �^"'�� : " i.� �� :` , �t0� p __ � , - (i� soi � i. �i► ► ;. �,",•'�„� � ' � � ' � � N 5 � i i' � � ` � __. . __� � '4p� . �� ,� . ...r..,. � . 6 E • � '�aw 1' � ----+--- -- I� �, �Se K �SS� iS« d f►�? � s,�'s"'. _ � ' I � 8g� (z000) bSyp �. . � � �ss -- --- •- �,eo7 • • � , � 8�' ...�'� _ �SS1 �'` --- --9 --- w( � i �,,, �s:� P "~ ii G � 1u� 3 Y �; o � �• �S�S LS3� �S,T - s�t N -j-' �,r�;�- (No1 . .� � ' Q • � � y . � 9 9C 9 d � -"�' � � � � � � � t q2S 131 !3s w �:: 8 2 i � : �� i:� �� '�;: a�'"'� � ; .' .M� �:� �i,�! ro� 1 f°� so s� M �, • I i ' :; ' • -- � . • � � � � ,a, y $ � r #_ . � ; _.�� i` .,,� � �. :� � � . ±� �': ��`� '� 'fi'� � f �`' �- �s• ,�.' _ �" .iRC aar�.y''�,c t�F�'i'� �+!',�e'a.kr _��` ?� �� ,�G'-; t ,4 =' �1` • � S� l �aRe.'y �,- .'s'�.Tc`T� . . . :v. _ ,j.�r- ^w �. ; :'r � $ .. - �'.�r _ .. � •�s,= .��'; �'-�'�' — — - � / I`� — � J \ '� � J . J' � � `� . • V" � 1 � �� ` y O • � Y• y `J N I I 3 ;� � �.a, T � y . `, ,_ � .,- � y � ' 1 : . �, �� f L- _ � �T ,;. �. / � ./ .. t,L.; 7 S � .,}; �, ' ' I _ _' ,—__ ,�: �1 - � f .Cr';�_� ��'�. - «' - ..,.� .�. , `` T _ v � � 7 ►� )�fC. + � `� s • , _. -- 1�•3 ••• • � � � � � , `` � � L�� ,�2i- �.`.1�� , :� C�.�.��' • "� • �. `� �'"` � � -�-:.�,�, ,-,..,(� s N ' '� ;�� .: �,; : —s�k�_ r� _�U,` ..�s� �� • .. : � .��-� ». - 1 � .�s:..._� . � � � ��.� '� . � � • i r ' ` 1 � p.►..�'�..�.-sr . , � - w M��r =,�� :'t .. . _ , .� � , . .�'� -�� . i -- • -- - - --- -- — ---- � ;� _-_--- - _ : � : F z5.. ; 0 � �` �� .� � � � vA �, . � _ I � ; , `_ _ _. _ ' . � ! + � �� / � I' • � l tfi � , t /� � � /� — __ � � � : W � � � � 1 0 . . � 0 �. u - �. .� G;� �. i� � S .1 � :, Y : . .y � � r � �. s , , , ti W ` � �� J v � �• _ .� Q _ �. � � i �\ v1 ., , � — fi1.3� — � S;.O � - �'CL � � 1911 �1—�tl � �3 �� 990 ��' i;l �'R�w ' '2 � Il =i !o � �r 9s 3'� 96t . � H }i � _{ _ ., +��y• ��9 �y • � . ' � .�. . � " ' . � .4 �' �� Lo � . �,s �i�r•�J . ► i �- 2Cidb) - . 0 �l � 3 . : . , . 'N1�ss�ss+nP► .- . �- _-- --- , .. � � '; �, • . . - - - � ' : ;ir•-• �.�:�a:ri� . . • - - �r� +�1, • � � �"��- t'- � s �• _•_ a: T�'i'•;• �.�� , . . . • - . � . y. : . . ,ti �s; r ..��. �!t. ��-'�� . . . ' ." . � . � � � ��-.�s'�.J•��Lr'�,�.}�L' - .� • :, %� ,. ,.. • �-~ , � . :: � •' �� • : � '. ' �-_:..s�,-., _ t �.. `�.. .. ` .; ` � ^ ' ,'. �. ) • � • -; - �'� �r:� . ' � t�. i ' : � � •t� k . a � �. � • � �.'} • = 1°. ` .�, � � _ • •� . -i `�' , �••.. ,�`��'t� •x .� t �, � . = . • � : .' 'q`•`� . +:1 ��_ , _ �r�. '�j ` :', ;�_ ' . �,��.s�'i •t•.. • '. � . ' .�T�-riw"•�j�f�'1h� `*S'� �..• •t � y 1� : � N . ,i. w�3a. ' . � . - � .. � - ' �N � `�'-�-�,� .'� !� - •. � - • ' . ' . • • -�" •t. '�- � t�� `� ' �+ F i;'. • • . `•� • ;t.. _: { :f� -''�� •: : . : - .r • ;,;.-`. .y�-� z '�y� ' �. , .%' � :/r- .�. - � � . ' ` . - � . ;r -j: `�:��;,► ,; � �� • . �"'�,, L� /!" Mr��;�� '�' �� . . • t , a •�i ti �� . . . . . . , �. *• - � •/ '!r��• ��/ �'- ��.�� ti �.s: 6S! . e: � �, � L� —� � r� 19C;9�� ' . ; 2� � � 8 .�T C� 931 93S � 9. 0 , � ` .� / L.S.#84-05 John Hitchcock ,'_ :7 '.'' � - ��„7 - -- ------- _.__ -� :'r 1 � �r � _ � .� � •� ' ! � 0 : �� O �' � s� roi .:; '� � � � � r':� ( ,'• • � • • 1 � O ri�i'• II_ � i 1 \ � .•� .Y7 ��.i i '; ,� � ` . ,�•' - s__�_ , 1 . ,�_-..� � :. � . �_ i � �� o� .ti '�ti � 11 EE � �' tis,' I 9 3 � � i;' I �� S �l8��i�/S�E — i� 4. 37 - �ii �� _ _ �� . ,�r r' �v w'�'' I .f � �. � � Q t_ : i i I =W o � � � :W ��M ch � ° o• �► �� No w � �� r � � � V �� !A z O ' a3 3s � � '1 ----�.�: . •.•.rfr � ' :•:•:•:•'�+'r:�� 33. ot � — ��'_ —/�4.3�- _ — .� N88•s7 %S "W � . /1�fissis,siPPi - � ---- - �---- �- --_ _ . _ ---- • _� . _..��!%�BS ° �7' /s M '� �S. L.� COUN T y STA TE A/O --_..._ /S/i� � i� • � � :''! I.:• / /NCl/=- FEET. ' " ' �',1 �{S //Z /NCN /RON P/PE SET. � � �^�� J�'� MONU�t!ENT FOUND. • � � • '• � =: � ' '?l' ;" �1/; _F FRO,'.' ASSUMED OATUM. �`E,vo.-c,s iv�c0 C Ar4 sd r " ' ,v�rs r rw�,v .r�r, A - - . _ ....._ - - -- --.--..;.-.,.�.._.. . . I � PRESENTATION BY HICKOK & ASSOCIATES ON MOORE LAKE PROJECT STATUS � �ti� RESC��ITPION AA. - 1984 A RESC[,ii�ION Off2DERING , APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERIl�G ADVIItTISII�I'P FOR BID6: MOORE LARE RESTORATION PRCUECT, FHASE II WHERFAS, �he City has previously decided to participate in the Federally assistecl Moore Lake Restoration Project; and WHERF,AS, Hickock and Associates has prepared plans and specif ications and obtained the neoessary permits from the Department of Natural Resources. NQnI, �iEREFORE, BE IT RFSC�,VID by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the improvements proposed by Hickock and Associates are hereby appraved and ordered to be constructed as soon as reasonably possible. �at the work irnrolved in said impravements shall hereinafter be designated as: Moore Lake Restoration Project, Ptiase II The Public Works Director shall acoordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon the making of such impravements Lmder such approved plans and specifications. �e advertisement shall be published for three (3) w�eeks (at leasi 21 days) , and shall specify the work to be done and will state that the bids wi11 be opened and considered at 11:00 a.m. on the 8th day of August, 1984, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and that no bids will be oonsidered unless sealed and f iled with the Public Works Director and acoang�nied by a cash deposit, bid bond or oertif ied check payable to the City for five peroent (5$) of the amount of suc� bid. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY �iE CITY �iJNCIL OF �IE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. WII�I,IAM J. PIEE - MAYOR ATI'EST: SIDNEY C. Il�II�fAN - CITY CGIIZR 13 r 0 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS City of Fri dl ey 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Sepa�ate sealed BIDS for the construction of the Moore take Restoration Project which includes aquatic weed harvesting, placement of a nylon screening material over the shallow water bottom sediments, installation of a hypolimnetic aerator, mechanical dredging and application of aluminum sulfate will be received in triplicate by the City of Fridley at the Fridley City Hali until 11:00 o'ciock a.m., (Local Time) August 6, 1984, and then at said office publicly opened and read aloud. Bidders are advised to allow no less than 15 days before responses for specific subcontracts from Minority Business Ente�prise fi�ms are due in orde� to comply with the MBE requirements as defined in the CONTRACT DOCUMEMTS. The CONTRACT DOCUMENTS may be examined at the foilowing locations: Fridley City Hall 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fri dl ey, Mi nnesota 55432 E. A. Nickok and Associates 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, M�nnesota 55391 Copies of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS may be obtained at the office of: E. A. Hickok and Associates 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 upon payment of $50.00 for each set. No refund will be made to any bidder or non-bidder. Each bid shall be accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bidder's bond, or certified check for not less than five (5) percent of the amount of the bid, payable to the City of F�idley, which shall be forfeited to the City in the e�rent that the low bidder fails to enter into a contract. The successful bidder shall furnish a performance bond within ten (10) days after award of the contract in the full amount of the contract. The performance bond shall be executed by a company duly authorized to do business in the State of Mi nnesota. 13a 13 � The Owner reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive irregularities if it appears that such irregularities and/or errors were made inadve�tantly. In addition, the Owner reserves the right to accept any o� all bids that will be to the Owner's best int erest. No Bidder may withdraw his bid for at least ninety (90) days after scheduled closing time for the receipt of bids. Any contract or cor� racts awarded under this invitation for bids are expected to be funded in part by a grant f rom the United States Environmental P�otection Agency (EPA). Neither the United States nor any of its departments, agencies, or employees is or will be a party to this invitation for bids or any resulting cont ract. �he procurement will be subject to regulations contained in 40 CFR Pa�t 33 and the owner's policy regarding the increased use of small, minority, and�women's business participation. The policy as well as the cited regulations are contained in the specifications. Bidders will be required to comply with the President's Executive Order No. 11246, as amended. The requirements for bidders and contractors under this orde� are explained in the specifications and in 41 CFR 60-4. By o�der of the Fridley City Council on July 2, 1984. CITY OF FRIDLEY By: John Flora, P.E. Director of Public Works -2- 14 MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: SIDNEY C. INMAN, DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL SERVICES/ CITY CLERK SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT N0. 132 DATE: JUNE 28, 1984 The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the final assessment roll and the publication of hearing notice on Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 132. The work under this project (Phase I) has been completed, and covers the area outlined in the attached notice of hearing. SCI ps Atts. RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 132 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that the assessable cost of construction with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 132 including all incidental expenses thereto is estimated at $ _470,190.00 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amounts to be specially assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman 14 A RESOLUTION N0. - 1984 RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESS- MENT ROLL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 132 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment o the cost of grading, dredging, storm sewer and related drainage appurtenances, and other facilities, WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the 6th day of August, 1984 , at 7:3Q P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 132 2. The City Clerk shall publish notices of the time and place of ineeting in the official newspaper of the City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF > 1984• E ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman MAYOR William J. Nee � 15 A CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 132 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of�Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 6th day of Au ust, 1984, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objections, � any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wi t: STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 132 The proposed assessment roll for each file and open to public inspection by office of the Clerk of said City.� of said improvements is now on all persons interested, in the At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the con- struction of grading, dredging, storm sewer and related drainage appurtenances, and other facilities located, as follows: Al1 of the land commencing at the intersection at TH No. 65 and Central Avenue, thence northerly along TH No. 65 to 63rd Avenue; thence easterly to Pierce Street; thence northerly to Mississippi Street; thence easterly to Central Avenue; thence southerly to TH No. 65 plus all the properties along the easterly side at Central Avenue from TH No. 65 to Mississippi Street and all lands within, adjacent, and abutting thereto. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serwing notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY � ATTEST: MAYOR Wi iam J. Nee CITY CLERK Sidney G. Inman Publish: Fridley Sun on July 18 and 25th, 1984 0 „,� ”' �,, �: ♦ /� i � , � ��, ,� ... _ POLICE DEPARTMENT City of Fridiey Minnesota DATE JUNE 20, 1984 FROM PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR, J.P.H SUBJECT RESOLUTION - REDUCE SPEED FROM 40 MPH to 35 MPH on Osborne Road ' '' �_ � 16 _. - . , i MEMORANDUM TO NASIM f�URESHI X INFO Enclosed is a resolution to reduce the speed limit from 40 MPH to 35 MPH on Osborne Road from Monroe Street to University Avenue for council consideration. The resolution is submitted for council consideration at the request of Councilman Hamernik based on citizen concerns. JPH/sa � RFSC�.Lfl'ION NA. - 1984 A RF�%,iTI'ION RDQUFSTIl� �iE CnIJDTI'Y OF ANORA ZO REDUCE T8E SPEID LIMIT ON 06�ORI� RQi�1D FROM MONROE STREET �0 TRUNR HIGIi�IAY 47 (UNNERSITY AVII�IJE) WHERFAS, Osborne Road is under the jurisdiction of the County of Anoka; and WHEREAS, the posted speed limit on Osborne Raac3 from Trunk Highway 65 (Central Avenue) to Monroe Street is 35 I�H; and WHERFAS, the posted speed limit on Osborne Road from Monroe Street to Trunk Highway 47 (University Avenue) is 40 l�'H; and WHEREAS� within the posted 40 MPH zone on Osborne Road there consists a hospital, medical center, church, shopping center and senior citizen resident facilities; and WH�S, the City of Fridley Public Safety Director has stated that he and the t�ief of P+olioe of Spring Lake Park prefer a uniform 35 MPH speed limit on Osborne Road between Trunk Highway 65 (Central Avenue) and Trunk Highway 47 (University Avenue). N�a, �TERF.E�DRE, BE IT RFSCGVID, by the City Council of the City of Fridley, that the County of Anoka be requested to reduce the speed limit on Osborne Road from bionroe Street to Trunk Highway 47 (University Avenue) in an attempt to pravide greater safety to motorists and pedestrians in the area and provide for uniform speed for traffic enforcement purposes. PASSID AtID ADOPTID BY 7.IiE CITY �[JNCIL OF Z�iE CITY OF FRIDLEY �iIS LIAY OF , 1984. wu�,� J. r�E — c�oR ATIFSr: SIDNEY C. II�4iAN - CITY (��2R 16 A � � ClTvnr . . v. f [Z! DLEY p11TE fROM_ tUSJECT " 6/26/84 OtRECTORATE OF Pl1BLIC WORKS 0 John�G. Flo'ra, Director,Pub.Wks. Police Garage � Storage Area Bids 17 MEMORANDUM � 117�OY TO ACTION INFO. Nasim Qureshi, City Manager We opened bids for construction of a Police Garage and Storage Area North of the Civic Center, on Tuesday, June 26. 1984 at 11:00 a.m, i� the Council Chambers. Twenty-three contractors had obtained plans and specifications. Three bids were received. Monette Construction was the low bidder at 5394,700.00. The NRA had preliminarily approved the following four project portions involvi�g the construction of the Police Garage and Storage Area and site preparation for the Target facility. ITEM E57.COST SID C057 Preparation of Land s 144,000.00 S 100.594.00 Construction of Retaining Wall � 170,000.00 $ 146,691.00 Construct Storage Facility = 75,000.00 a 1I,960.00 Construct Walkway � Landscaping � 80.000.00 � 15,455.00 � 459�000.00 � 394,700.00 Reviewing the plans received from RSP and the number of quertes received during the bid advertisement, it appears that the plans and specifications we received did not provide for the construction of the driveway entrance off of 5th Street. Accordingly, this item should be added to the bid received and approved as Change Order #�1. We will discuss this with Monette Construction and hope to have quotes by Monday, July 2 for this work. Recomnend the HRA receive the bids and authorize the City Council to award this contract to Monette Construction for 5394,700.00 and Change Order �1. While the preparation land figure looks low, this item may in fact increase. It appears that the Target contract did not specify that the excess material from the excavation was to remain on site and the earth contractor is planning on removing it which wi11 result in a decrease in material to be moved and an increase in fill that the City is to provide in order to bring the site up to rough grade elevations. We wi11 follow this iten �losely. JGF:jmo . • BID OPENING 11:00 a.�. Tuesday. June 26. 1984 City Center Project (Garage/Storage facility) fridley. Minnesota CONTRACTOR dID-BOND AMOUNT � Monette Construction Co. 2050 White 8ear Avenut ' St. Paul, MN 55109 � 777-1339 Witcher Construttion Co. 2730 Nevada Avenue No. New Hope. MN 55427 544-2727 Acton Construction Co. P. 0. Sox 394 Hugo. MN 55038 429-3371 i s � i : s 394,700.00 : 397.500.00 s 464,666.00 17 A 17 g HOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 27. 1984 YAGE 2 I�r. Qureshi stated the owners are also interested in purchasing the old Phillips 66 gas station. He stated they have approached the owner and are in the process of obtaining appraisals and, once these are abtained, their proposal will probably come back before the flRA. Itr. Prairie questioned if 312 funds were not received, what would happen. I�. Qureshi stated there would probably be a further review of the pot- entials and what the risks would be, however, the new owners wish to attract wore business. He stated all indications are showing that the new Country Buffet restauzant in Holly Center is doing a fairly good business since they have opened. Mr. Commers stated there were some appraisals done on this gas station several years ago and thought perhaps this information may be useful. 2. HARDWARE BUILDING USAGE: Mr. Qureshi stated the aew owners of Holly Center have indicated that Snyder Drugs may be interested in expanding their store and unless they are given more space, they may not renew thefr lease. I�. Qureshi stated the City currently has a lease with Holly Center for the liquor store. He stated the sales approach for liquor stores has chaaged and a number of warehouse type stores are opening. Irh. Qureshi stated this type of operation has been discussed with the City Council and the proposal is to lease about 8,500 square feet fn the hardware buildfng. He stated the lease would probably be for three years, with a guarantee of two years, and the last year would be optional. I�. Qureshi stated it is estimated the City would have to put almost $60,000 into this operation and Would lease space at $2.50 a square foot. He stated if the HRA moved out the liquor store in the third year, they would proportionately pay for the improvements which would probably amount to about S10,000, since some of the items included in the $60,000 figure could be sold. Mr. Qureshi stated if the HItA gfves conceptual approval, the relocation of the liquor store would possibly be in October. He stated, at this time, there is no guarantee Snyder's wants the additional space, but they have indicated an interest in expanding. _ IC was the general concensus of the HItA members that they would be interested in such an arrangea�ent if the City desires to proceed. 3. PIANNING ApPRWAL FOR POLICE GARAGE: I�. Qureshi presented the plans for construction pf the Police garage and storage area,:ovtlining the location of the bridge, walkway, driveways, and storage apace. l�h. Qureshi stated the HIiA called for bids for this construction which were opened on June 26. 17 C HOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I�EETING JUNE 27 1984 PA� 3 Mr. Qureshi stated the estimated costs, as indicated in Public Works Memo P117-8A froan John Flora, were as follows: Preparation of Land $144,000 Construction of Retaining Wall 170,000 Construct St�orage Facility 75,000 Construct Walkway � Landscaping 80,000 He stated the total estfwated cost was $4b9,0p0 and the low bid received from Monette Construction was $394,700. l�. Qureshi stated the costs were broken down as follows: Preparation of Land, $100,594; Construction of Retaining Wall, $146,691; Constructfon of Storage Facility, $71,960; and Construction of Walkway & Landscaping, $75,455. Mr. Quereshi stated the traffic consultant proposed an island to allaw only right turns on Mississippi Street, and to increase the lanes from two to three on the South driveway to Sth Street, and these improvements were not included in the bid so there would be an additional cost of about $10,000 to make these improvements. He requested this work be added to the bid under Change Order No. 1 The HRA received the following bids for the garage/storage facility in the Center City: Mc�nette Construction Co. Witcher Construction Co. Acton Construction Co. $394,700 397,500 464,866 M()TION BY Mt. PRIEDITIS, SECONDED BY I$t. RASl�'NSSEN, TO INSTRUCT THE CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE BIDS.AND AWARD THE CONTRACT TO Ti� LOW BIDDER, MONETTE CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING CHANGE ORDER N0. 1. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON CO�RS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIIYDUSLY. I�. Qureshi stated it would simplify accounting procedures if the Cfty Council could make payment to Monette Construction, however, both the HRA and Council would review the payment and concur with it. He stated the contractor would also receive payment sooner since the Council meets more frequently than the HRA. I�. Commers stated the City is in agreement to share in the cost of the _ storage facility. Ah. Qureshi stated the City would be paying their portion of these costs. I�. Qureshi stated the County has been considering wideniag Mississippi Street all the way to Sth Street and those costs would be brought before the I�2A when a decision is made by the County. l�r. Qureshi stated the NSP power line will be relocated which involves substantial costs and it may be easier for the City to pay this re- location cost, zather than the HItA, and thea receive a credit from the i�tA to be a pplied to the storage facility. The HItA members indicated no objection to this suggestfon since it would be an even trade-off. 17 D HOUSING � REDEVELOFMENT AUTHORITY MEETING� JUNE _27 L 1984 PAGE 4 I�fr. Commers stated dirt is being hauled out in connection vith the Target project and felt they would then have to bring some back for the parking lot. 1�. Qureshi stated Target is responsible for this operation so there would be no extra charge to the HRA for fill. He stated he ie meeting with the Target representatives regarding this question and if there is any change, he would aotify the HRA. 4. FRIDLEY CENTER CITY PLAT: I�. Colmners stated the 1�tA tentatively approved proceeding with this plat for the Center City. . MOTIQN BY MZ. RASMUSSEN, SECdNDED BY I�t. PRAIRIE, TO CONCUR WITH THE I�IYOUT AS PROPOSID IN THE CITY CENTER ADDITION P'IAT. UPON A VOICE VVTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COIYII�RS DECLARED THE M()TION CARR IED UNAN It�[JUSLY. S. APPROVAL OF 49ERS USE OF HRA PROPERTY: The �tA received the information regarding a carnival license in con- junction with the Fridley 49er's Celebration. 6. REQUEST FROM STORER CABLE TELEVISION FOR FINANCING ON CABLE RELOCATION• I�h. Commers stated a request was received from Storer Cable Television foz compensation from the HRA in the relocation of their cable lines in the redevelopment area of Mississippi Street and Universfty Avenue. Mr. Commers stated staff has recommended denial of this request as the franchise agreement between the City and Storer states that removal or replacement of service lines shall be at the expense of Storez. I�r. Qureshi stated NSP will be relocating underground some of their power lines an the City's franchise agreement with NSP provides they will be reimbursed by the City for this relocation. The HRA received the memo from the Public Works Director, PW 100-84 regarding the request and staff's recommendation. 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The i�tA received the financial statement presented by Irk. Itunan, Finance Director. There was a general discussion cn bonding and whether the �A should call for bonds at this point in time. Mr. Inman stated if the i�tA has a fund balance at the completion of the Target project, it becomes speculative to bond without any other projects. � CITY OF FFiiDLEY� SUBJECT MINfVE90TA Gbm. Dev. Div. Protective Insp. Dept. ��,�� i R APPLICATION mber � ev oQ• Approved by 910-F9 1 1 of 1 800 : Dote 7/1/Bl APPLICANT:� y , ^r �✓, CE �(`��y � owNEx: �[UG1'T/�. ,�il�^�caE.c _ ADDRESS: /G��l% LJ/U/`l��2f� % ��/� . ADDRESS: �C� TEL. N0: �L`2. Z�� v (026 TEL. NO: �/9iy� LAi�DOWNER: UL�C/f� /�•,��„E�u�� ADDRESS: �/�iY//'� . TO B� '��£rR 1�10E: SIZE: � SO/ USED FOR: �'/'C�.; :[pi •S PERIOD OF TIME T'O BE STORED/OCCUPIED: �u L�,. I6 � C%L %.3/ s� LOCATIOII OF TRAILER OtJ PROPOSED PROPERTY: Attach Plot Plan of Property showing Trailer Signatures of Adjoininq property Owners Granting Approval: Relationship between Trailer Owner and Landowner: .�/��' Names and Ages of all Occupants(If Residential Use): �� " ��- P. Facilities for Sewage Disposal, Water and Electricity: ,, - �� ,, � Please find attached a check in the amount of S30.00 for parking the trail� or $50.00� for both narkinQ and occupying the trailer. �— -- --'" IaATE S �/2�� FOR OFFICE USE Date Received: Council Approval: Stipul�tions: RECEIPT NO: /� � f� f LICENSE I�10: EXPIRES: . A . � f , � • �` � . ��. �fi ., r ii �� .r..� . r �. " � � rrr ,;��. � r ��.~t l � �•�at�tt�.1_r`. d�, 3�r ��. � �• . tr- . r,`�c,^ '�' j� Z ,t:� ,� �..�"y� � �� ' 1 � • �l . • � ♦ > ti � , � �' ..;„ . _ .a =� . ;;. � � t::� + ` -x: , K�. - � .. +, • .� . :� , '� s. y. �� . � :tr. �!y r � ,�., e.;1 � .�'� � ti i�, _�� 9��h€��'a �i��\ �t _ • �� .:r. ,,�`',•l�.y.,', '�'' '#M c:..�. .r� - ' �y � � t.�'•f. �s.r+t �. +• � � .. `-t�r�i-• r�'�x�� 1 �►f E�.� o ; �f., ._. y,.... F -. � ! _ S�, ��-J.�P� �. s :� � _ •y .: ,j , ry � -1` ` ti.s: . r y . e � r y� 3; ., . � �. . { � ;f�. i � "�i � � �}" {: � 1 a s -'£ A . i t . . ',,t _ 1 E`.: � 4 � � �' � ` ' �, r : �. � r -' y 2� ' R ��' �, . . � ..:,• y , b�' � t 1 � ' ' •"� �'J o�, .� i , ♦ � �`_ p'. �,'� ,. H. z, �_ , .�y,'9't` ,�*' ".�' �`'_ f; �:y� t•.� r �f�� tn .. , _ , � €: �� ;y�..�.,yt�� ,' �,._ •' ,� ,,,�■ �' y ' � ° �� ' � :�_�� - - - �r ' . ► ., '- , • �. �—y i �g i r. �°}� • � � y� _ � •. . �' � �,0 �� it • s 3 � �Zr r � .�� s ��'�y� a'r � t!� � + � l �a ;,� y �o- t ti:a � ' � ? '� .n � �3 . � ,.{1Y ,.� '�''��.'�` J ,y. ��j ,y. .i �% � ^r .. : .2 � � F , '" � �'"' � ` X `:. , � U .� .•� R g� � ,ys�iA.�.� �• ,'� �.�'� . � � si � . � M► '' ''' ;•• .s ,t, :+�fiK , �•� • . � • 1 . �• � �1 k � i rt. 4 y. !f :'Y�� C �%� � . �' . } C•��• Y � �t } r+'.� � ~ ��i � . C1' � .' �r , fl' �w�.r � � '��4 �. �i :i"J'1 h•.4�- S� �,a.1, s� r� t. . �. � `4�' i � f.�! "� �%j� r S��r ` �';r.�a� �:,t��'-; �'i. `H;� li.. f;"':C . F �t.' �• •�.�,\ ,-�'/'J' �l�'�:• -.��. M�_� s � , r. � . � �.. � '9 / .�• � r r�, r . �,:. � , -�. :��. � _ . . • ' lS��:.ri �. �'..�., ��'j -s I� e � t�.,—�rL•y :��.�^I •'ty ]� . - , � � �i . ' � ` G `� �'�.�i'� � � '.i _� �'��: f• . a • �- '•1•� 'rt� , � , r r , :ft.' _ . . •;., .'-,'�� . I � _ • • .• . • ' . ` � • t � � N 9 � �, �. -.�..,.,1� �:� �; ''l,,� o .4 l � � � . •a�irr.�l : q y � �. .. c.�+ % � . - ��_ � ,: � . `. u %�`.'. � �:� �� ' 1Q�`'�.. `' , �r .: . Q��l ` ` . �� ._ i �k � J� .. �,. �� , � � � . _i = � ?.'. :."2 _ r '-,<.' � .��' ��.�i.., ,�. .✓;�i.'�. �Y3':, = r�{� ''' -� � . �'. '. .`.:•' .!, j- �,. 4; i � • t_ �� ^��► . .�•E �� . `:d .� S" � 1 J.:f �r 4: r �;�`�r • j �e � �r. - S (` `� . . - � � �� R .. . iT. � } . s+� .a '. 'Z• - '. . � L ..+ : t �`. � . y _ ` f � ; , x' Y � 4 . ' ..'17 ;'`� � t � ' ;a `.,.� y e ;�- ' _ . � ';� t '_ '� � �`�`� ''. - � : ` J �' 3. � :� V . _ ��,.. � �` al�/[j/��`�� . •� t-i �� . , �,. •L' • `• 1�� .t'1 ` `' � �r '' � - , , .�6: - Ja �I V _i . . - ` r' ' • � ,' � � .. . . ' . .,--,./f vT./s�Q.: �� . � � . ; - , . . • , '� �Z � . /. o. . . � � �� . �!` <�, � �; . � ,; � y, �o . ;, f ,�. ��•y � .,�x •'' � • � `� ' , '�'` � . , :q,� �: :., _ . �' �: }J� , �s� � . - t ' .. , � / . � � . e�/ : . . . � '.• ` .' �.` t . . � �- � '� 3 � .�• � .. _:_r �— ! r • -f • �y-�-.—� --i --� �j� � � � . � . 'i.� t 18 A � r FOR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL Julv 2, 1984 __ _ T�rpe of License- CIGARETTE Barry Blower Div. 99 - 77th Way N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 BOTTLE CLUB Ronnie's Pub Inc. 9825 Bluebird St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 REFUSE HAULER Bautch Disposal 10264 Xylite St. N.E. Mpls. Mn. 55434 Dan's Disposal 309 - 202nd St. N.W. Cedar, Mn. 55011 TEMPORARY ON SALE BEER Joe's Place Pizza 7441 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 VENDING MACHINE Bargain Auto Parts 7300 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley,Mn. 55432 Barry Blower Div. 99 - 77th Way N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Datsun North 7810 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Datsun North 7810 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Kennedy transmissions 7700 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Same James D. Hennessey Same A�proved By : -- LICENSES James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Fees: $12.00 $300.00 $90.00 Daniel Johnson Steven J. Olson $75.00 Health Inspector Late Fee�37.50 Tony Wajda James P. Hill $60.00 Public Safety Director Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Same Theisen Vending Same Same Steven J. Olson Health Insepctor Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector $25.00 $150.00 $50.00 $25.00 $25.00 19 - FOR CONCURRENCE 6Y THE CITY COUNCIL -- LICENSES ' JULY 2, 1984 GEbIERAL CONTRACTOR Arkay Construction Company 620 I3orth County RQad 18, Suite 189 Minneapolis, i�t 55427 By: William C. Rc�se The Carpenter , 351 - 97th Lane N.W. O�on Rapids, MN 55433 By: John Stanqret D& D Home Improvesaent, Inc. 7401 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, I�IlV 55432 By: Don Olson K Construction Oo. , Inc. 16560 iuther Way Eden Prairie, I�1 55344 By: Kenneth Sconberg Ray Kreps Construction Co., Inc. 1676 Chatham Avenue Arden Hills, t�1 55112 By: Raymond C. Kreps Merrimac Construction Company Inc. 828 Constance Boulevard ti.E. Anoka, NIId 55303 By: James Szurek Milbrandt Construction 5835 St. Albans Court N. Shoreview, NIl�i 55112 By: Richard Milbrandt RO� II3G Rainville-Carlson, Inc. 2929 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, 1�1 55408 SIGN ERECTOR Poblocki & Sons Co., Inc. 620 South First Street Milwaukee, WI By: Fdward Stallman By: Gerald Poblocki 19 A APPROVED BY DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc: DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. _ 19 B ' FOR C4NCURRENCE BY TNE CITY COUNCtL -- LICENSES July 2, 1984 Residential Rental Property OWNER LOCATION OF BUILDING UNITS FEE APPROVED BY David G. Schulte 5432 Altura Road 1 �12.00 Steven J. Olson, 401 River Lane Environ. Ofcr. Anoka, MN 55303 � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL —' ESTIMATES � JOLY 2, 1964 Herrick � Newman, P.A. 6279 University Avenue, N.E. Fridley, 1�1 55�32 : For legal services rendered as Citq Attorney for the month of May, 1984 Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon b Haskvitz 1250 Builders Exehange Bldg. Minneapolis, MN 55402 For legal servfees rendered as City Prosecutor for the month of May� 1g84 Park Construction Company 7900 Beech Street Fridley, l�IIB 55432 FINAL Payment Demolition of Building #3 Demolition of Building #5 Ted Renollet 927 Andover Road NE Anoka, t�Al 55303 FINAL Payment Demolition of Building �2 Demolition of Building #4 F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. 14203 W. 62nd Street Eden Prairie, MN 553��► � 6,665.00 � 5,�00.00 �11,460.00 � 1.000.00 Project #145, Water � Sewer Improvement E. A Hickok and Associates, Inc. 345 Indian Mound Wayzata, A4d 55391 Moore Lake Restoration Project II H � S Asphalt ?00 Industry Avenue NW Anoka, !�I 55303 Partial Estimate No. 1 Street Improvement Project No. ST t984-1 � 2 = 2,496.70 a 6,0,2.50 � 11,665.00 � 12,460.00 � 36,404.55 � 5,358.76 $113,614.06 20 0 � �nR6�l C. M<11AIGR owv�o �. MtwruM JAYtt [. KwM[GR1t�fR VCH HERRIGK 8c NEWMAN, P.A. wttowNc►� �� uw June 14, 1984 City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, MN 55432 Hay Retainer: HOURS IN EXCESS OF30 AT S50.00 PER HOUR: EXPENSES ADVANCED: •27t u�+wEws�Tr Av�HVt N.[. iN10LEV. MiNNESOTA 55��,2 i7t•�l50 $1650.00 737.50 District Coutt (Filing Fee re Johnson Condemnation): 37.00 Process Service re Fridley Police Association: 20.00 Process Service: 45.00 48 xerox copies: �•20 BALANCE DUE: G $2496.70 20 A 20 B �76-1 STATEMENT SMITH, �USTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON d� HASKVIIZ ATTORNEVS AT LAW 1250 BUILOERS EXCNANGE OLOG. MINNEAPOL15, MINNESOTA 55�02 3]9�14t1 rCity of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attention: Mr. Nasim Qureshi, L City Manager CJN pATE � �u�se w<h/AU 7M�{ �OAr�OM �I�M �ww �w�rawt • SUBURBAN OFFICE FRIDLEV � J � BALANCE FORWARDED fROM LAST STATEMENT 6-18-84 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during May, 1984. Representation of City of Fridley in court in Anoka on 5-01-84, 5-08-84, 5-09-84, 5-15-84, 5-22-84 and 5-23-84 for 163 pre-jury trial conferences and on 5-10-84 and 5-24-84 in Columbia Heights for 30 court trials. (84 hours) Preparation of 11 gross misdemeanor criminal complaints and 45 misdemeanor criminal complaints and miscellaneous office conferences with police and citizens. (29.25 hours� Administration (4 hours) TOTAL TIME (117.25 hours). (May, 1984 Retainer) �1,650.00 $1,650.00 Time in excess of Retainer (87.25 hours) 4,362.50 $6,012.50 _ SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON i HASKVITZ �ne�wi�s wt u� c 2U C CiTY Of f RIDIEY Engineering pepartment 6431 U�iversity Avenue f�idley, Minnesota 55432 Oate 6-20-84 Partial) :�tonorible Mayo� and City Council RE: Est. No. •� �1 �Finalj TO Per. Endin9 City of fridley For 6431 University Avenue Northeast fridley. Minnesota 55432 Park Construction Co. 7900 Beech Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 ST ATE ME NT OF WORK nrnr Contrett Item io❑ - Buildinc inn _ Ruilrlinc TOTAL stimateo � U�1L � v�a�� uantities Price This Est. rnwn�» uanttty Amount To Date To Date w � 11,6 56 00 � SUMMWRY: 7 i . Q�riginal Contract Mwunt Cont�act Additions - Chan9e O�der Nos. j Contract Deductions • Change Order Nos. _""'"" . �• Revised Contract Amount Yalue Completed To Oate SUB TOTAL Amcunt Retained Q�(�4 (.05x) Less Amount Paid P�eviously AMOUNT OUE THIS ESTIMATE � 11,665.00 _ --------- •. � --------- i 11,665.D0 � s 11,665.00 s 11,665.00 s--------- s--------- f 11,665.00 20 D CERTIF�CATE OF THE CO�TRACTOR j he�eby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date under tern►s of t�e contract for �eference project� �nd all authorited changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amourts Shown on this estimate (and the final quantities of the final estimate are correct). ano that this estimate is just and correct and nc part of the "Amount Due This Estimate" has Deen received. By Oate ontractor s ut ortZed eprese�ta �ve � e CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER i Aereby certiiy that I have prepared o� examined this estimate, ��d that the tontractor is entitled to payment of this estimate unde� the tontract for refe�ence project. CIT�I OF FRZOlE1l. 1kSPECTOR 8y CAecked By Date Respecfully suDmitted� • tiTr OF FRIDIfY � 100A/1091A By N . L , . • PuDlit Work S Oirettor 0 0 ' , 20 E C1TY Of FRIDIEY Engineering Department 6431 Unive�sity Avenue f�idley. Minnesota 55432 Oate 6-20-84 ' �_ Pa�tial) : Honorable Maycr and City Council RE: Est. No. ,1 �Fi�et) TO Per. Ending (iRy �f Fridley � 6431 University Avenue Northeast �erd Renollett Fri�ley. Minnesota 55432 927 Andover Rd. NE Anoka, MN 55303 Contratt ltem TOTAL $TATEMENT OF MORK � �ONTRACT :stimate Un�t uan ity auantities Price This Est. Lump Sum 11 460.0 100b �uanLtty To Date � To Date i SUMMARY: Ori9inal Contr�tt Amount Cont�act Additions - Change Order Nos. ------ �_ - Contract Deductions - Change Order Nos.------ .. ' Revise0 Contract Anwunt � Yalue Completed To Oate SUB TOTAL M►ount Retained �Q (.05x) Less Art►ount Paid Previously AMOUNT OUE TH1S ESTIMATE CERTIFICATE OF THE COATRAtTOR �.� �� -.� �� .� �� -.� �� s--------- s--------- s 12,460.00 20 F I hereby certity that the work performed and the materials supplied to date under terms of the contract for reference project, •nd all authoriied c�anges tnereto, - have an actual value under the contract of the amourts S�own on this estimate (and the final quantities of the final esiimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and co�rect and no part of the "Amount Due This Estimate" has Deen received. By ontractor s Aut or�zed epresenta �ve � e [ERT1FICaTE OF THE ENG]�ER Date " I AereDy certify that 1 have p�epared o� examine0 this estimate, and that the contractor is eniiiled to payment of this estimate under the tontract for reference project. CITY OF fR10lEY. I�SPECTOR sy Checked By 100A/109111 Date aespecfully submitted. CITY OF fRIOIfY By N . L , . . Publit Work s DireCtOr FOR CONCURRENCE BY TNE CITY COUNCIL -- CLAIMS Y 2. 1984 CLRI�: �LN�ERS 163A:0 - 1811"73 21 65o Eiy Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55y32 June 26, 1984 Fridley City Council 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55�32 Dear Sirs: Recently a Special Use Permit was approved with stipulations by the Council regarding build- ing a garage on my pr�perty at 650 Ely St. N.E. Extra costs are being incurred due to the stipula- tion that we must either add two rows of blocks or use water-proof �aterial because of flood plain requirenents. when I applied for this Special Use Per�it, I k�as charged a fee of �200.00 which I find exces- sive. The purpose of this letter is to request this fee be w2ived and refunded to me which would help defray these added costs. Thank you for your consideration to this re- quest. Yours very truly, �i� ,� � r . / !' ,, /`"l- = ; ��<I'�' �"....-, >'cr./�C� ,�,,�. _/ v Mary Lou Erickson - MLE 22