The URL can be used to link to this page

04/15/1985 - 51733 . . '. f ? _ � . . e�v i- _. - �' �ry _� - $=�$� . � - . . � , . . �� . . u . } . t , 'i�rClh'�S�i.a i `� yg9�'�{' � .. 'CYd �'. . . . . . . �a... �"" K � ;> i - - . . � . <.��. ' .. ' � . . . � - 3 . . �j� �� N� �� - � . . �� Y� ;�� .�� l.g� . . . . , k:'�, �' a f � . � +° , ','�. C ' . � . . .:� � ,: � ? Z- . . . . . . � . y : � . : . . . . .4. . _ J. . ` . . . �., i �.. . ' , •. FRIOLEY CI7Y COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADORESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN pqT�; April 15, 1985 MAME ADDRESS � ITEM NUMBER sssssssxssss=ar:=cc�oacca=�acco==�c=_c:==:==ca==ac=ccc========a==aos=�csasa=aaca=sn'=cx======z=� A �. '' -�-�-- �'" �-" _� � ' 3 - t� ��, � _, - ti ,. . , � - ` `' . � � - � r� -' � ' � � � � � C? l 1"`� f C �.: �_� �� `" �'t�� ,' !` j'_ ,* ' ' ..�' V ._.> � �- r�% Q .4c 3 �� '�.� ��, � --� o\ � ��` �--�;...�s �� -� �, �r��.. � ::�,,.�� -- 3�s � �� -� , � ; ., .�+�-f... ,,��1-'. ,.,4 �_.__ � �4: Ct �„/ P� ..,• � � � ._».. � ___ .� -.�1. �. � ,, ° - 3 --> , - ',._ -' , ' -�, "2 � . �G��4. __ . � - � �v C�� `�.�. � � � , . �,.. .�.C� �,k .'� V { L..�-�� = ' � ..� � /� �` ,j±- �, �°'�� , p � d M , .t ✓ . . ��'` � % � � -- �3 �� r;� ' ��..� � � ,-� � � �-7 � - -, ., � ;! .., . , ..� � ',. . -�' . - ' j� - �---t... �-'? .'c. � . , �.,,, �— / J 1 ci , / ; �f ; : - �1-'1-t- . S < ..}.;� � - : �c .n�.. L. f_ :� .1 .� "'l � �.�.� ; �. � 533� 5� s7- �� 3 - 3 � �� .� � � � d"� � � � � � � � � � . 3 - � � - :.r �s � .� : ; s'i ! ` `i _.� �t a -�� - 3 e l � �� , �`=; :, <� �, � 3 - 3 Gr * ° �' �i .r..� � � `-" � �' ! � ..�' � ,� � ,, , . � � ,� , � ,� ._N- � � 3 - 3 �l , �-I �.,�.�eM�� .- 5' �� o �� ` 3- 3 GC :�-�-�.-, ��,�' �- � g71- � �-r��--� �" � 3 - 3 �t r .� � _ � � ; � � � � .��, : ��, �, ,,�'�� `_ � ' ..�� i .�. �- � �,: ; P.. , � L � �"r��"� f ��( �� F "F -- �� 1 — lJ� `t CZ�-c � �' ' `- � �� ; . /t` �� f'Q'[/ „ ✓ ✓ �° 1 � }� � �� . .� ` �CiC.. 4 �: i G'C ` h � . ^ „�- � � � ;,��., .�, � � � � �, � r� £ � � � 3 - � . _ , � ,�� . . � a , > � -- � � % ° ' �� i ' � � �'� � �"" � . , � �,;�F .�"�� tE� �� ; .�.� ,,,rr�' _ , i < ;.r .: ��, .,r1 � �� ;�i � � �.'�'t,�� . �� L� i ' , ��.1 : � � =' - -- �' ti -� � �, � ��i .h �� i • . / i , _ ! , e ._ ,, �, _ / _ � ��- d�.� �/�S►_- �,r_ , %,'. ,�O_ . �_ ��i .� • • FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEE7ING PLEASE SI6N NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: Apri7 15, 1985 NAHIE ADDRESS - ITEM NUMBER ccz==asszz=anar= -a�r�=aacaa=an�=aa_a�- =a=nnrncanacc�co=a=ac:_=a=aa=sssxsa===cc=a---=======a=r � �" -� � Q. %% . � /;, �/n � �, '�� t� �. E,-z...�.� , �rt,..�.,A,.`a � ! 6^` �� `' / �.� �, j� � y1 �°� � � �'� ,,,�,�<.,^ J/" ,r �` %.� �i, :. , . , , - , ✓,: � _ rt , . �, , ? - •:_ .�.� .. ,1 ..�� .. - 3 - 3 U �,c �t. � , �� . . �'� , . .� S' '�, • � . 3 - 3 . � � -�� --� � � r� � �o. ,� �- � r�-�-- �'� 1 �" �- � �- � t�. � 3 - � cc� � � �`c � Sti'�'� �:,.'►�.�." , / � ss�` -�- 3 �/ r �' - � ; �J�-� . �z7 � , �r�'f -`� ''�-� _ 3 (J -� � m u� rn -� � `' � � �- `� ��_�. �,, . � � _ 3 �} J � � , �l+,�� - o �� ,�� a � ��'A � ,e �s a�.� ��-, � ,�.+. ,_, � �./ P" .. i.. {3 �^� � � r � ; :., �� p c; � ,;.- y,,,� � � � <:. ; �' w� l..% � �-�' � _,,.-� ^' '� � .� - '� , , � � '�.� J � � ��, .i L S J � ` -,r j� -.%... ,_,: q> �- � ' �-�! ' =`�,. - �..�: � ��l�d - .� - � -.-'��• f/. � '� �� v ,� � 1 C , - c ✓ - �� ... '. . .� ; - � �, "; :_J , ��. � � C �,� - � . � V ��, , ' .� � � s�� S�.t, .�.- --� �3 -a� , /� V /. 7� ✓ e. ,ti.�, E' - �'/cc-',',--e �, .:. � �v , GL,� `L�V� �. G•... �4� �" �.-� ;�,, � �-,, .�,�, ✓� ; , / ;' �.�rr ��7.,.�' � 1l %� '-� �G-"t� ; "�--k-- ,� li � t� � �!�.�.�` �.� , , ��P' � ., W ; � f'> -� � 'T � .� � �, � ( 5 � u ,..:: �- ,< � � ' � �. `�� ,�. v � 3 - 3 (.�. � ' � ''� � � � 5 � ; �J � �J� � �} J � :,J�� i j ��1 � %� ' � � � �1; t {', I J {.K/`�`-i � ' �..� 4'' � - � C..^ , , T � � � ) I-'�` U I� � >� �� J� � l � � � � � � �� i �, . r..T ��-! )�,� . � 1 , i� - '.1 .r "�.: � � ��#,... �' a .} .�.,�• � �, y�„. r' - � ,��,�' �,, �- �'�-' ��-- ' � ' � � . .r Tk�i � � �� . � b�' '.'��. �.% . .}, � � { 4 / � �� ..�I ��" S 3�G� ��`T t�sT �i� _ 3 - 3 C/ .� • • FRIOLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER IN7ERES7E0 IN DATE: April 15, 1985 NAME ADDRESS � I7EM NUMBER �- t FRIDLEY CI TY COU N C IL '' ��``� �` �� APRIL 15, 1985 — 7: 30 P. M. Following are the •ACTIONS NEEDED" to be taken by the noted Departments. Please type your answers on the TI911 by Noon, APRIL 24 (Disk 03, Directory l, Category 26, Appropriate datej. Just replace "Action Needed" with 'Action Taken•, no need to print it out. Please call Mary Lu for any assistance needed. � • . . � V \ • Council Meeting, April 1, 1985 Minutes adopted as presented BpOPTION OF AGENDA: Added to Licenses: Consideration of food license for Sears Surplus Store. • • � • : v 1►� : No response • � � Consideration of City Council Appointment to Human �Resources Comr:ission (Tabled 4/1/85) . . . . . . . . . . . . Steve Billings, 5215 Lincoln St. N.E., 55421, appointed to Auman Resources Cornmi ssion �ITY I�ANAGER--ACT�ON NE�DED• Inform Steve • Billings of appointment � 1 Council Meeting, April 15, 1985 � �!. � Page 2 Consideration of Executing a Pylon Sign Agreement f or Midas Muffler, 8094 University Avenue NE ........ 2- 2 D Sign agreenent approved p_DB1�IS.j!�ORRS--ACTIQI�i �1EEDED: Have approved agree- ment executed and f orwarded to appropriate parties Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission of Apr il 3 , 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 HHH A. Consideration of Request for Special Use Permit SP �85-OI, to Allow Rule 36 Residential Mental Health Program f or Anoka County, Commun- ity Options Ltd., by Renae Hanson, 5378-5364 5thStreet NE ....................................... 3- 3U Planning Cotnmission Recommendation: Approval i 3GG-3EEE with Stipu2ations Counci�ction Needed: Consideration of recommendation Item opened at 7:40 p.m., continued at 11:25 p.m, until May 20 Council Meeting Pp�LI� WORRS--ACTIOI�_ NEED D: Inf orm appl icant of Council continuance of item. Put on agenda of May 2 0 B. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing on Vacation Request, SAV #65-02 to vacate a Drainage and Utility Easement, 6747 k'ashington St. NE, by Arnold M. Ruhnly .............. 3Y - 3Z Plaanina Commission Recommendation, Approval � 3FFF-3HHH with stipulations C�uncil Action Needed: Set Public Hearing f or May 6. 1985 Set hearing for �iay 6 ,ps B1 LIC WORRS--ACTTO�I NEEDED: Aiake arrangements for Public Searing on May 6 t Council Meeting, April 15, 1965 ► . : ►� .� � -. Pa ge 3 Receivfng the Minutes of the CATV Advisory Commission Informal Meeting of March 19, 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 D Minutes received POBLIC WORRS--ACTION NEEDED: File for future ref erence Consideration of Changes in Allocation of Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds as Recom- mended by Human Resources Commission . . . . . . . Changes in C.D.H.G. funds approved PUBLIS WORRS--_�'x'ZON�EDED: l�Iake changes in C.D.B.G. funds as authorized . . . . . 5 - 5 E Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting of Special Assessments on Parcels 1000, 1340, 1400, 1530, 2500, and 2460, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, and Replatting into Creekridge Addition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resol ution i38-1985 adopted CENTRAL SERVZ�-_ACTION NEED� Proceed as authorized With splitting of special assessments Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting of Special Assessments on Lot 7, Block 4, University Industrial Park Plat ... Resolution #39-1985 adopted �;NTRAL SERVICES--ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized with spl itting of special assessments . . 6 - 6 G . . 7 - 7 B � 'Council Meeting, April 15, 1985 � . � •� r -. Pa ge 4 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting and Combining of Special � Assessments on Part of Lot 2, Block 1, and all of Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block l, Paco Industrial Park Plat ..... 8 - 8 B Resolution #40-1985 adopted rFNTI�Ai• SERVICE�--ACTION NEEDED• Proceed as authorized with, spl itting and com�ining of special assessments Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting of Special Assessments on Parcel 150, Section 22, and Parcel 2080, Lot 9, and Part of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 78 ...... Resolution #41-1985 adopted �E�TRAL SFRVICES--ACTION NEEDED• Proceed as authorized with splitting of special assessments Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing and � Directing the Combining of Special Assessments on Lot 1, Block 2, Midwest Addition, and Lots 2-3, Block lI, and Outlots 0, V, RR, LL, MM, and NN, Great Northern Industrial Center . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution #42-1985 adopted �ENTi�Ar• SERVTGES--ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorizeci Witb combining of special assessments . . 9 - 9 A 1Q-lOB � Council Meeting, April 15, 1985 � . � • r � � • _ Pa ge 5 Consideration of a Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement fot Bids: Street Tmprovement Project No. ST 1985-10 11 - 11 A (Seal Coat) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reso2ution #43-1985 adopted _ p`nAt Tc WOFLRS--ACTIQN N_F.F_.T�_F.1'�: proceed as authorized with advertising for bids Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Approved s�hTRA� SERVICES--ACTiON HEEDED; Pay claims Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-13U Added: Food license for Sears Surplus Store. Approved 1 icense f or Sear s Surpl us Store. All other licenses approved. Pulaski's liquor Iicense to be reviewed at 3 months and 6 manths �p�»41fT c�RVIGEs--ACTION NEEDED• Issue licenses as . �rJi approved. Write pol ite letter to Shorewood to pay their taxes. Review and report to Council on Pulaski's liquot license at 3 and 6 months Est imates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 A Approved CFhTRAr &;RVrGES--ACTION NEEDED: Pay estimates � ' g�JOVRN: 11:50 p.m. � COUNCIL MEETING. APRIL 15. 1985 ►.: ► PAGE Z CONSIDERATION OF EXECUT(NG A PYLON SIGN AGREEMENT FOR MIDAS MUFFLER, 8094 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ........ 2- 2 D RECEIVING THE MINUTES 0� THE PLANNING COMMlSSlON OF APR I L 3, 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . 3 - 3 HHH A. CONSIDERATION OF RE�UEST FOR SPECiAL USE PERMIT SP #85-01. TO ALLOW RULE 36 RESIDENTIAL MENiAL HEALTH PROGRAM FOR ANOKA COUMTY. COMMUN- ITY OPTIONS LTD.. 6Y RENAE HANSON, 5378-5384 5TH STREE7 NE ....................................... 3- 3U PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATiON; APPROVA� 8 3GG-3EEE WITH STIPULATIONS COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION B. CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION REQUEST. SAV #85-02 TO VACATE A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. 6747 WASHINGTON ST. NE. BY ARNOLD M. KUHNLY .............. 3Y - 3Z PLANNINC Cor�MtssioN RECONtMENDATiON: APPROVA� $ 3FFF-3HHH WITH STIPULATIONS C4UNCIL ACTION NEEQED: SET PUBLlC HEARING FOR MAY 6, 1985 COUNCIL MEETING. APRIL 15. 1985 ► � : ► •► ► � PAGE 3 RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION INFORMAL MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 D CONSIDERATION OF CHANGES IN ALLOCATION OF FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AS RECOM- MENDED BY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSfON . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5 E 0 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORlZING ANQ DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS oN PARCELS 1000, 1340. 1400, 1530, 2500. AND 2460, AUDlTOR'S SUBDlVlSlON N0. 1B. AND REPLATTING 1NT0 CREEKR I DGE ADD I T I ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 G CONSlDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTtNG OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 7. BLOCK 4. UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT .,... 7- 7 B COUNCIL MEETING. APRIL 15. 1985 11 � � 1 •► ► � PAGE 4 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING AND COMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PART OF LOT Z. BLOCK 1. AND ALL OF LOTS 3. 4 ANO 5, BLOCK 1. PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT ..... 8 - 8 B CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL 150. SECTION 22. AND PARCEL 2080, LOT 9. AND PART oF LoT 10. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 78 ........ 9- 9 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZlNG AND DlRECTlNG TNE COMBINlNG OF SPECIAL ASSESSMEN7S ON LOT 1. BL4CK 1. MIDWEST ADDITION. AND LOTS 1-3, BLOCK 11. AND OUTLOTS U. V. KK. LL. NM. AND NN. GREAT NORTHERN (NDUSTRIAL CENTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 B COUNCIL MEETING. APRIL 15. 1985 ► . : ► •► ► � PA�E 5 CONSlDERATlON OF A RESOLUTlON ORDERING IMPROVEMENT. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST 1985-10 ( SEAL COAT ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 A CLAIMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 L i CENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13 U EST I MATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 A =� � �► THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS -0 F APRIL 1, 1985 : , �:i ��r�U�4 • • �:i ; yr,�i ; ; ��+�M��. • • �:i ;�; r� � w1+4 •�.�.�.Nr • � •• r , �, 7�e Regular meeting of the Fricney City ��ci7. was called to order at 7:37 p. m. tr,� Mayor Nee. PI�IDGE OF AId,EGIAN(� • . Mayor Nee led the �tincil and audienae in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. BULL CAi�I.�: NENBERS PRESIIJT: Mayor Nee, Qo�cilman Goodspeed, �tmcilnar► Fitzpatrick, O�imc.i.lman Schr�eider and ��mcilman Barnette NEIMBERS ABSF1�lT: None APPI�VAL OF MiNtfl�S • dDUNCIL 1�'TING. N�,RQi 18, 1985 • M�TI0�1 by doimcilman Barnette to apprave the minutes as p�esented. Seoonded by O�uu�cilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, aII voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried �ulanimously. ADOPTI�i OF AGEAIDA • Zhe follvwing iten was added: Oonsic7eration of a Petition f rcxn the Multiple Sclerosis Society Re: GaQning Pull-Tabs. NDTIO[�1 by Cbimcilman Schr�ider to adapt the agenda with the abave addition. Sewnded by doimcilman Fitzp�trick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declued the motion carried tuzani.mously. OP'EN FOR[A�1, VISI�RS• Mr. Ed Wilmes appeared before the Council regarding brochures to be distributed o�anoerning the Islands of Pea�e. He stated the Islands of Peaoe Fb�.a�dation had a meeting with the various groups throuc�out the metropolitan area such as the Shrir�er's Hospital, Veterans' Hospital, Courage Center, representatives of the Anoka do�ty Retarded Citizens, Coon Rapids Senior (5.tizens, and local nursing homes. He stated, fran this meeting, there was agreement that brochures regarding the Islands of Peace should be distributed. 7�e ��cil reoeived a sample of the type of brochure which is proposed to be clistributed. He stated the Islands of Peace is the result of a great deal of vol�teer work and hoped the brochure would be sent throughout the State and o��try. He stated he thought the Islands of Peace has set in examgle for many areas to follaa. -1- •�.Ii��M1 �I�I�Iy/�. • ' ; �; � • � : . 1\i • ;�� M� ; �� ! � 4 N. : M�M �. �� 4.i /; r� � �,� • �,:: � ; h � MM : `� u�� : 4 MM ; �i � : ; .� . �� ; M7I'ICN by ��cilman Goodspeecl to waive the reading of Ordinanoe No. 830 and adopt it on the second reading and order publ ication. Seconded by ��mcilman Sc,hneider. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee decl�ared the m�tion carried �animously. � ;�� r� ; � • � � ; !�� r�. W,� �+: �� M44 �� ; v� _�� . �. : � ; • �+��+M � �� ..� ti • �r;,� `� 4+K � ��► ' 1: � * � . �4� � • � ; �I� : ; � � ��, � N�� . � NDTIoIV by Cbi,alcilman Barrette to waive the reading of Ordinanae No. 831 and adopt it on the seo�nd reading and order publication. Sec�onded by C;ouncil Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried tazanimously. • ;�� ► ; � M �! : •�� ; 4.� �+; 1� � 44 �� i��i� 1�. «. : � ; �� y_ �1� !l�I�� ;: �;��/ • �• : �� i `i N� • � 1 y�i ��i�l� �. � 1wDTI0t3 by do�mcilman Schneider to waive the reading of Ordinanoe No. 832 and adopt it on the second reading and order publ ication. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried iulanimously. ��,� 1� �IC: �� • M4�1 !� J� ; ' :� �M �� ►M 4� . 4 : � ; .� 1; . !� � 4 • � Y; : �I� : NDTIo[�] by �tmcilman Barryette to table this item. Seoonded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, I�hyor Nee declared the motion carried �animously. f+t�. : i+�'�# : �_ \�r�. 4.� v� �l �4 � , , ; ;,+ : •! � u � � ul � • = : : ; I�DTIQV by Councilman Fitzpatzick to receive the minutes of the Charter �mmission meeting of February 25, 1985. Seo�nded by Cb�mcilman Schneider. Upon a voiae vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried w�animously. . ��.� �� .91�: �i� � : �y�.� � �1� �� 1��.9i�� yj I� • � I�� a� � � /y�� : � � � '� �4 u I�Ir. Jim Hill, Public Safety Director, stated the Council previously cliscussed this itsn at the budget hearings and decided to wait until this cost estimates were obtained before appropriating funds. He stated authorization is rxyw being requested in the aQaowit aF ($34,000) to purchase equignent and servioes for Phase I of the �qrading of the outdoor warning system. -2- •�. a�.M� � �+�+�r,. • ' : �; r Mr. Hi11 stated i-he ��cil had apprwed enc�mbered f�ds in the amount of $8,000 for this project. He stated the total cost for Phase I is $57,000 with Anoka �imty c�ontributing $15,000, a federal grant for $21,000 and the City's share would also be $21,000. to match the grant. He stated the City �st initially front the $21,000 federal grant, therefore, $42,000 would be needed less the $8,000 already apprwed or a total of $34,000. Mr. Hill stated Phase I pravides for replacement of the siren activation systeqn to radio o�ntrol tel�netry rather than the current Iandline type systen. He further explair�ed the results in implenentation of this project. He stated Phase II of the �oject would be regla�nent of actual sirens fran mechani.cal t� electronic, hawever, both these phases are independent of ead� other. He stated there are no federal funa� or �ntract awards for Phase II at this time which will at an estimated oost of $100,000, less trade-in oonsiderations. He stated amortized aver a 25 year servioe expectancy, this would equal $4,000 per year. Mr. Hill stated what is requested at this time is authorization for the transfer from the reserve fund of $34,000 to comglete Phase I of this proj ect. M�TION by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the expenditure of $34,000 for Phase I of the outdoor siren activation systan. Semnded by O�uncilman Barrette. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, I�yor Nee declared the motion carried imanimously. ; • •► �• •;� ; � �';• v. ► ;�� : :� ;�� :_ !r v: � � ; �� v: 4 . `�9: _� ��'�.�• I_ u�_.�� ':��. !_!+ �! � ' � ; � � ��i� l�t I�DTI0�1 b� ��cilman Fitz�atrick to adopt Resolution No. 31-1985. Seconded by O��mcilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried �manimously. � �� . �M � � \ � � � � �� _i +. 4��_ N� _.+� e � � ��J�� , e �f� � � � � \ :��/_ CfM �_ u�_�.� �� ; � C v' Ct� t_ v� 1M ' C!� �►�� 7+ •. � � � �i+l� 1V NDTION by Q�uzcilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 33-].985. Seconded by O�Lmcilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. i . � � � \ � � � � i.� � � 4 � � � . M. \ � + � \ : � � � � � w_ « v: • � � �� `� w►: 4_ • •_• .r: : : �!• ; � : ; .l ; ' ;:. 4 � i�DTICN by Cb�cilman Barr�ette to ac7�pt Resolution No. 34-1985. Seoonded by O�uncilman Sc�rieider. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, P�yor Nee declared the motion carried cu�animously. � : `• � �,� �! • , � _ � �. u�• ;�� _��+,� • ��; � � : � � ��. • : � ; � : � �_��M '+ .v�� ; = �!� .�..4_ ; : �� : �1 �: ; "+�i,l_ � ';�! 1 � � -3- �� i�,,w� ��a��+Y��. • ' ; �� i'�� M7t'Iot�T by d�t.ncilman F`itzpatrick to ad�pt Resolution No. 35-1985. Seconded by O��cilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried imanimously. 11. RE.90LUlZON N0. 36-1985 SUPPORTII� HOUSE FILE NO. 815 AUTHORIZING ABSENTEE iT(�►PING BY EIE�C VC7rING SYSTEM: Mr. Lman, CYty Qerk, stated this resolution is in support of a bill to allvw a ballot pag�e and punch aard to be eent to an absentee voter so they can be allawed to vote via the p�ch card on an abseritee tssis. Mr. Irman stated, cvrrently, absentee ballots are cast on paper ballots whic�i have ta hand tallied and rewrded on c�nvass sheets. He stated this is a time oonsuning and c�anbersome proaess and questioried the secrecy of the absentee hallot. Ae felt this new system would speed up the process and mairYtain the secrecy of the voter. N�DTIOiN by ��cilman Sc�neider to ad�pt Resolution No. 36-1985. Se�nded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. : '.• . � �:� �! ' � �.r; ►. 4.i r,►;, �N )�i� 4� . : v�� )�Y • . 1 1 1 �NMM. r► .� �l i�M � 4; • � ; � 1►u 1rDTI0t3 by �incilman Fitzpatrick to acbpt Resolution No. 37-1985. Seoonded by O�tncilman Goodspeed. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried imani.mously. •��+ 1�.91�: �� • � �� I_� �� 4 ��ti��:� y�e � �'�I\'! �f� \�� ^�/ V 4��_ . Mr. F'lora, Public Works Director, stated a request has been reoeived to put two temporary trailers on the property south of the new Nautilus oonstruction site. Ae stated the awner of the property has approved the request and the txailer would remain at the site during oonstruction of the facility and be renwed within seven months when o�nstruction is c�ngleted. I4DTI�1 by Councilman Schneider to apprave this request for a temporary trailer lioense. Seo�nded by ��cilman Goodspeed. tTp�n a voioe vote, all voting aye, I�yor Nee declarec3 the motion carried �manimously. 14. I.,IC�NSES • N17I'ION }x �incilman Schneic3er to approve the lioenses as suZxnitted and as on file in the Lioen.se Qerk's Office. Seoonded hy Councilman Barnette. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried imanimously. 15. Q�s M�JTION by Councilman Barnette to authorize payment of Qaims No. 1851 throuc� 2039. Sev�nded b,� O��cilman Schr�eider. Upon a voice vote, all -4- /��/I+�M� yl�i� ��. � ' : *i � voting aye, l�yor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. Cn1�S�ERATTOi� OF A PETITTON F12�M THF: �i�j[lTTTPL�; $��1�STS �TEI'Y �: GAMING PSII.Lr'TABS: , Mr. Bud Chaldy, Marketing R�ep�esentative for the Multiple Sclerosis Society, appeared t�efore the �ulcil regarcling their request for a gambling license at the Shorewood Inn. � Mr. 7rman, City Clerk, stated the City �c3e specifically prdzibits gambling in an organization where liquor is s�ld for profit. He stated to issue a livense to the Multigle Sclerosis Society for the pull-tab operation at the Shorewood Inn would be in violation of the City's liqu�r orclinanoe. Mr. Chaldy stated acoording to State statutes, it is legal to engage in charitable gambling to aid the �nai��a. He stated, however, he uzderstands the City's position because they have r�n into this probleqn in other m�icipalities. He stated he is not asking the Council to violate their laws, but would Iike then to oonsider repealing this section of the c�ode that would be in oc�nflict with allowing these type pull-tabs and enact a new ordinance. He stated the City could then also enact additional legislation to glave restrictions on gamt�ling such as ntiunber of locations, hours of operation, etc. which oould be more stringent than currently imposed by the State. Mr. Q�aldy stated the sole purpose of having the pull-tabs is to help the many people who need this charity and, it is hoped these charitible gaming f�mds would replaoe those servioes being eut b� the ggo�verr�¢nnent. He stated they are required to file monthly reports to the State Gaming Board and would be happ� to supgly these reports to the �uncil. Mr. (haldy stated they propose to lease space from the Shorewood Ir�n for their operation, hawever, this establishme.nt would have rr� interest whatever and would not reaeive any of these funcls. He stated they hope to raise between two to three million annua].ly fran about 120 differerrt locations. Mr. Ir�nan stated the League of Cities is looking at scane of these issues as there are already cities that may have pull-tabs. He stated another issue is the definition of a charity. Mr. Chardy stated the State does specifically iderrtify what oonstitutes a ci�arity. Mr. Aerrick, City Attorney, stated if the Gouncil was to approve thi s request, it would be �eaessary to c3iange the ordinanae. He stated there was an Attorney General's opinion issued in August 29, 1983 to the City Attorney at Cross Lake where it wasn't oonsidered proper to issue this type of lioense for gambling where liqta�r is being sold. He stated if the Council wishes to amend the ordinance, he would get in touch with the Attorney General's Offioe regarding this opinion to determine if it is current, as amendments to the gambling ordinance took effect in March, 1985. Mr. flerrick stated he felt clarification is needed as to whether the State feets, in these ci.rcunstanoes, the City a�uld iss�e a permit. _5- a�. i►. . � „��+�+�r�. � ' ; :� � ��I�� Mr. Herrick asked if there were othe oommunities in the State that have authorized the �le of pull-tabs in privately operated establishments. Mr. CY�ardy stated Medi.na Ballroom has pull-tabs and the City of Austin is oonsidering action to allvw this type of operation. Mayor Nee stated perhaps the O��nci1 oould study this issue further, but felt this was rather short r�tioe. Mr. Qiardy stated he would withdraw their application at this time, rather than having it denied, and give the Oouncil an opportunity to study it further and file anpther application at a later chte. : � �. !; ��ui�� I+�JTION by douncilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconcled by �incilman Gooc�peed. Upon a voioe vate, all voting aye, Ngyor Nee declared the motion carried �nanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Q»cil of April 1, 1985 adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Aespectf ully sutrnitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City O�tncil Apprwed: �- Wil l iaan J. Nee 1►�yor 2 . .; r�� if.� . ?�ti f MIEMO T0: JohA ora; Public Works Director r= MEMO FROM: Phil Dommer, Planning Assistant MEMO DATE: Ma rch 29, 1985 SUBJECT: Execute pylon sign agreement for Midas Muffler, 8094 University Avenue N.E. Mr. Newman, the Assistant City Attorney, has prepared an agreement which indermifies the City from any damages which may result to the pylon sign located within the easement at Midas Mufflers, 8094 University Avenue N.E. Mr, and Mrs. James I. Taylor have executed the agreement as rep- resentatives and owners of Midas. I request that signatures be obtained from Mayor Nee and the City Manager, Mr. Qureshi to com- plete this agreement. The agreement is attached. � STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA AGREEMENT D THIS AGREEMENT dated this L.ZN day of February, 1985, by and between the CITY OF FRZDLEY, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor") and JAMES I. TAYLOR and MARGARET M. TAYLOR, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "Grantees"). WHEREAS, the Grantees are the owners of Lot 1, Block 1, University Industrial Park, Anoka County, Fridley, Minnesota, and WAEREAS, Lhe Grantor has an Easement for the maintenance of sewer and water lines over the East 20 feet of said property, and WHEREAS, the Graatees have placed a free-standing sign which encroaches upon the Easement held by the Grantor, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. The Grantor hereby agrees to permit on the following described property located in Anoka County, to-wit: The East 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, University Industrial Park, the placement of the Midas Muffler free-standing sign as it exists as of the date of this Agreement and which sign is owned by the Grantees. 2A 0 2. That the Grantees acknowledge that the Grantor may from time to time need to utilite the Easement. This may include but not be limited to certain construction activity which may be necessary for the maintenance and repair of the existing sewer and Water lines. The Grantees agree to hold the Grantor harmless for any damages which may be incurred by the sign due to the Grantor's exercise of its rights within the Easement area. 3. The Grantees further agree that in consideration of the Grantor permitting the subject sign to remain upon the Easement that the Grantees agree that they will not upgrade, expand or make additions to the existing subject sign. The Grantees further agree that they will not place any additional signs within the subject Easement area. Notwithstanding this language the Grantees acknowledge that they will have an obligation to maintain the existing sign in a reasonable fashion. 4. This Agreement shall be binding upon both parties and upon their assigns and transferees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have affixed their signature io this Agreement on the date first mentioned in this Agreement. r�•� CITY OF FRIDLEY BY: Its Mayor BY' G ,Its City a i � Ja�es I. Taylor t . 1 ��,•. , �„ �/�� Mar aret X. Taylor , STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) L� L� N n The foregoing was acknowledged before me this <?� — day of February, 1985, by WILLIAM J. NEE, the Mayor and by NASIM M. QURESHI, the City Manager of the CITY OF FRIDLEY, a Municipal Corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the Municipal Corporation. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) �NV On thfs 2� day of February, 1985, before me, a Notary Public, within and for said County, personally appeared JAMES I. TAYLOR and MARGARET M. TAYLOR, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. ��'. /,. �; � � . ��4r! / " � i y • � . THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: " •''"� "" s ,:. �, _ .. ,� HERRI CK 6 NEWMAN , P. A. � �:; ,,, 6279 University Avenue Northeast • -� •. �. �t' Fridley, MN 55432 . .,�."- ....•w.ti'n„".',�..'":.. . .. 2C � �1 , 1 �• � �� 8094 UNIVERSIT MIDAS EASEMENT & SIGN LOCATION ��t�:t� �+,iz ,a .av M - - - - - - -�X -�� - - - _ � - - •_.__ • , `' . � �- -�' " • �.�'f `" � ' \ �� ' � �Af G-,G i- �- - �� _ v � � ; �, �. �� • .� � . � - � . � � ,^ — - �� r . �ra:.� �1me��rp • .� ;!,� .' ; � .� • •l < �s j � ` _ j = 1 Z 1 • ' � t� ' l � t _�!`' i �� i.�-�' �: . �,,`._� � V ,• t: �' �. • / r�, e ., � � ♦� •�ti � .\ � ± �. 1��•� , r' ��;. �3� ~• . -'—.a _c;.=-.�r'��►•r=;�y '-' - ��. .� T •i �.•�- i�f � � /!•' �-�� •� �� •: ;;F,�41,s�.� � ��s'.��. �s� .�� $' : :°' :�� • � "., -�'� ; �'. . � �' .' � _ . ;�.. � �,''�.' �`' ' .- .-.. :� . . � �_ t ` e o-� ;:'-� -' : � � • Ik /j� jt •. � � �. •s: . . � ' � ' �,1� !`'• . L, � ./{� ••••.� �. w . .��. �r . ' ! . � � • ' . ' . ' •.i...,.� '�.� `�. `� :.�. _ t , ` `± • �� . . . ' ' • �' - ' , � � � , . _� . . � -I _� ' 1 �'. ` li� - 'b �� `�,� . - .. : . � _ �� .,� . ,�� -.1: . ,- . _ -.� - •�-L •�.' '�t� ' ' ' , � � . � . • \ � • �• �.' ' f �~ �'� • _ — � `. '� • - - �'•�''►'s� - . � � � -i • � �7 �' :. �. �` ' a ' :��= � � - — � � / t4`%, ''� � + . `' ::' � , . . � s�'Q �" fs� E �'. : �►` :: . ' 'ys,�,.� . ` r � .� ��}� • ..w j a' •�. �i� r � ' " 'R ' .�'� � . ,� - -- -- .- - p.,� , ," � . i � � � �� r� � . . , � ,� ,�b , x��► ,� � � . �d'iq M3;� Q3yoJo�11. • � v �� • , •" • • , • / .. i• � • �•• ' ! . � , ♦ � : . . �j' � �� /� �. � .��' ,' � � , � �� ;{� ❑ � � � � � i� 4 • � 1J'J � ! / �� `/ � '/J v��.:•�` .;�� ✓� �.•�. ��f�..,:.. ��{ � I� � � . \ �/ • A, - • -' • . .` �� . � � �Yt wt_ .\`,\ � `\ �; � • . �\ � �� s \� o� � �y`� �� A �, ~ ' �� ♦ ' � `� � �� . � �` ♦ � •, � � � � ., � � �•\ f� � \�C •�� M�� . •� \ �'J 2 �o tin' � o �- • � 2 1— t 'J W Z • � _W � N 4J . � t � V • v W �� « •) �. • , � � u : �� V t � ' � � � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3. 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel ca]led the April 3, 1985, Planning Cor�xnission meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: MeMbers Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Mr. Minton, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Nielsen, Mr. Saba, Mr. Kondrick Members Absent: None Others Present: Jim Robinson, P]anning Coordinator John Flora. Public Works Director Dennis Schneider, City Counciiman ►N• Gerald Johnson. 712 River Lane, Anoka Renae Hanson, Conmunity Options Ltd. Diane M. Oilendick Wright, Cortmunity Options Ltd. " Robert Anderson, 6800 Oakley St. N.E. Arnold M. Kuhnly, 6747 Washington St. N.E. Ruth Dunn, Fridley Focus See attached lists APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 2�, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSIQN MINUTES: MOTIAN BY l�IR. MINTON, SECONDED BY XR. NIELSEN, TO APPROIB TXF. FEB. 17� 1985� PLANNING COMMISSIDN MINUTES AS WRITTEN. � UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE 1NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. RESCHEt�ULEO FROM MARCH 20, 1985 AT PETITI(1P�ER'S RE�UEST: PUBLIC HEARIN�: . - � ezone rom - one ami y we ing o- genera us�ness , o , Block 5, and Outlot 1, Donnay's Lakeview Manor, to be used for comrnercial development, generally iocated at 5698 West Moore Lake Drive N.E. Item continued until later in the a�enda because of related meeting taking place in Community Room I. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #85-Oi, COhP�tt1NITY � ,. . er Sectlon ., ,, o t e ridley 1 y o e, to a ow u e esidential Mental Health Program for Anoka County on Lot i and 2, 81ock 14, Hami]ton's Add;tion to Mechanicsville, the same being 5378-5384- 5th Street N.E. !lOTION BY l�t. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICIC, TO OPEN TXE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP �185-02 BY RANAE NANSON. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC AEARING OPBN AT 7:37 P.!!. 3A PLANNING COMMISSION �EETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated this proposal was for a special use permit for a community- based mental health facility. This proposecf facility wil] have 14 residents. The location of the proaosed facility is on the corner of 54th Ave. and 5th St., just south of I-694 and east of Highway 47. The zoning is R-3 multiple family. The nearest R-1 zoning is to the east on 6th St. Mr. Robinson stated the facility was a four-unit complex with four side-by-side units, each having three levels. The lower level consisted of four garaqes, laundry, utility, and storage. The main level or street level consisted of living room, kitchen, and eating area--approximately 850 sq. ft. of tiving area per unit. City code requires there be a minimum of 650 sq. ft. of livinq area for a two bedroom unit so this was in excess of that requirement. The third level consisted of two bedrooms and one bathroom. Each of the bedrooms has at least 120 sq. ft, which was signficant in that the program requirement for this tyoe of facility calls for a minimum of 60 sq. ft. of usable bedroom floor area per occupant. The petitioners are proposing two occupants per bedroom. Mr, Robinson stated the building modifications aroposed will include cutting doorways between each of the units to allow for program supervision. Of the four kitchens, one would remain as a congregate dining area, the others would be used as office space. Stoves, refrigerators, and sinks would be removed from the other three kitchen areas. Mr. Robinson stated that presently there are eight parking stalls--four qarages and four hard surface areas. City code requires eiq�t stalis so this does meet code. Two stalls are required per two bedroom unit. He stated the yard was relatively small and lacks visual appeal. It needed landscaping and a passive area development which would include a security fence. Mr. Robinson stated the program will serve approximately 14 men and women, at least 18 yrs, of age, with primary diagnosis of inental illness. Priority wi11 be given to Anoka County residents. One of the key thoughts here is that the facility should be located fn the people's own county so they will be able to maintain existing jobs, family ties, etc. The program category fs Category 1 which entai]s intensive clinica] treatment for the residents. Mr. Robinson stated the screening process has been described as thorough to ensure the clients referred are of no danger to the neighborhood. The clients have been described as withdrawn, insecure, lacking skills which would enable them to have jobs successfuily on their own. The concept is to mainstream these individuals into living arrangements which would be more independent. The typical duration of their stay would be 4 months - two years. Mr, Robinson stated this facility would be licensed by the Minnesota Depart- ment of Human Services as a Rule 36 facility. It would also be licensed by t�e Minnesota Department of Heaith as a supervised living faciiity. Anoka County will fund the program for approximately 55X of program costs. The balance of 45% will be paid as room and board bv the residents. Mr. Robinson stated the proposal does require a special use pertnit. Under R-3 zoning code, convalescent �omes are allowed in residential with a special use permit. � PLANNING C(�lMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, ]985 �� PAGE 3 Mr. Robinson stated the proposed staffing for this facitity would inciude an administrator, program director, theraptst, counselor, and a nurse. It would tnclude a living skills specialist, a recreation specialist, several mental health workers and a secretary. One of the key provisions of the Rule 36 program is that there would be 24 hr., 7 day a week supervision. Some one would always be awake and someone would always be on call. Mr. Robinson stated it was also interesting to note the Minnesota State involvement in this type of facility. Recently there has been a force to decentralize the mental health facilities; in other words, to get them out of the core cities and into the suburbs. Presently there are numerous mental health facilities in tF�e process of being established in other surburan locations. l�r. Robfnson stated the State has enacted special arovisions which include the Minnesota Public Welfare Licensing Act which was passed to regulate the Provisions of these services and to ensure proper care at these facilities. This Ac.� was evidence af the fact that residential facilities of this type have been maJe a matter of state concern in that municipalities are prohibited from imposing more,restrictive conditions on them than are imposed on other special uses, unless necessary to protect the health and safety of the facility residents. Mr. Robinson stated ti�at in terms of the Fridley special use permit, the special use permit restriction was set up to allow reasonable amount of discretion in determining tF�e suitabiiity of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, hea]th, and safety of the area. Although not explicitly allowed, this parti- cular use is neither exp7icitly excluded and,in general,falls under the cate- gory of a convalescent home which is allowed in R-3 with a special use permit. It was interesting to note that this type of facility would be allowed in C-2 or commercial zoning without a special use permit but would require a 20,000 sq. ft, iot area. 7he proposed lot is slightly over 21,000 sq. ft. Mr. Robinson stated that in researching the facility� he talked to Ms. Marge Wherley, Resident Program Consultant of the Hennepin County Mental Health Division, who stated that of the 20+ mentai healti� facilities in the Minneapolis area and the City of Minneapolis specifically, there have been no incidents of assau]t by a resident on a neighbor. She also stated they facilitate over 800 clients a year. Mr. Robinson stated City Staff was recomriending the following stipulations if this special use permit is approved: l. Operation to be reviewed annually with a public hearing for the first two years. 2. Residents with automobiles be restricted to flve or less. 3. Rear yard to be fenced w�th six foot high solid wood fence. This is to be completed prior to occupancy. 4. Petitioner to provide a landscaping plan and install prior to October 31, i985. 3C PLANNI��G COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 4 5. Proposed Advisory Comnittee to include City representatives (i.e. Human Resources Comnission member and/or police Special Operations Division staff) 6. Contingency plan be tnitiated with Unity Hospital to cover any emergencies. 7. Facility will comply with all State and County rules and laws and be fully licensed. 8. Factlity will comply with local and State fire codes. 9. Client characteristics wi71 be consistent with petitioner's contract with Anoka County (i,e, individuals who do nat exhibit behavior that is harmful to themselves or others). The petitioners were in the audience. Ms. Diane 011endick Wright stated she was the President of Community Options, Ltd., and the proposed owner of the building. She stated she would give a brief review of how Community Options came to be in the Fridley area in terms of the selection of this site and the type of process they went thraugh in getting the contract with Anoka County. She would also tell a little about the needs assessment. She stated Ranae Hanson, also a Board member and Secretary for Comnunity Options, the person who had met with the neighbors and has done most of the community contact,would speak on items regarding program characteristics, etc. Ms. Wright stated she currently owns and operates a facility in the Cit,y of Brooklyn Center called Northwest Residence. She has been in residential treatment for the last nine years and in social services for the past eleven years. Her program that will be in Brooklyn Center as of April 19 (has been in the City of Minneapolis) has been in operation for about 12 years. She stated she has a Master's Degree in Social Work, has been in mental health for the iast four years. Frior to that her residential experience was in children's care and treatment. Ms. Wright stated that in early January, Anoka County had a proposal (request for services) that went �ut to vendors across the State of Minnesota. It was an open bidding process and seven vendors applied, of which Community Options was one. They had to write a program proposal, budget recomnendations, possibilities of sites, etc., and went through a pretty str9ngent review by Moka County along with references and oral interviews. Ms. Wright stated Community Options was selected as a potential vendor because it was felt they most closely met the needs Anoka County wanted to address. Anoka County did do a needs assessment that was quite comprehensive, and there are a number of out-of-county placements because there is no Rule 36 in Anoka County. She stated they currently have three Anoka County residents in North- West Residence, so there is definitely a need. At this time, they are the potential vendor, because the County does not act on their contract until the end of Apri ] . � 3D PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 5 Ms. Wright stated they started looking for a site and had three real estate agents working with them. They viewed and called about 75 sites tharoughout Anoka County. They had some pretty stiff standards. The facilit� had to be easily accessible to public transportation, They needed 14 beds which did rule out several other four-plexes. A factor in favor of this site was it offered bedrooms on the second level from the iiving space which was ideal for their programming. So, the proposed site has a lot of qood potentials and also it would require a minimal amount of remodeling which was important in starting a program when funding was limited. Ms. Wright stated they had one neighborhood meeting last Thursday evening. If things go as they hope,they will not close on the property until after they have received all the permits and have received the contract from Anoka County. They would then give t�e tenants notice to move and would have probably 2-3 weeks to do the necessary remodeling and then accept clients. This would probably mean a timeframe of July or possibly t�e end of June. Ms. Ranae Hanson stated she and Ms. Wright were partners in Community Options. and she would be the administrator of the program. She stated she has started and administered two programs with the Willows Convalescent Centers, She started and administered J3nus Treatment Residence in Bloomington and the March House program in Minneapolis. The Janus 7reatment Residence was the only long term program in the suburbs, it has been in Bloomington for three years. Ms. Hanson stated there wil] be 14 clients, both men and women, with mental illness diagnosis. They will not be taking any people who are violent or dangerous to others, who are assaultive, chemically dependent, or mentally retarded. Their clients will be people who are appropriate for coMmunity place- ment who can live in the comnunity without any problem. They are not people who should be in the state hospital or community hospital. Right now most of these people are living in other Rule 36 residences outside Anoka County. Some are living in private apartments or with parents. Some are also living in foster homes. They will get some referrals from community hospitals-- people who have experienced depressive or other kinds of episodes, are in the hospital and then are stabilized and ready to go back into the community, but would do better not going back to their families or into their own living situations at first. She stated often clients from Anoka County do not want to go into the centra] metropo]itan areas because it is very frightening to them. The clients are often very vulnerable to assault and often they have been victims of abuse in the past. Ms. Hanson stated all the clients are in the program voluntarily and do have to meet ail the criteria. Once they are in the program, they have a strong independent living skills component that trains them in cooking, cleaning, personal hygiene, transportation, budgeting, etc., depending on their individual needs. There are group therapy and individual therapy sessions. There is an educational vocational support proqram. Many clients will be getting GED's, going to other work or coliege programs, or training programs. Hopefully, before they leave the program, they will be working or be in volunteer placement. All residents have individual psychiatrists and social workers working with them. 3E PLANNING COMMISSIO�� MEETING, APRIL 3� 1985 PAGE 6 Ms. Hanson stated the administration would be as follows: Administrator - 1/2 time Program Director - full time Therapist - full time Counselor - full time Nurse - 1/2 time Secretary - 1/2 time Ms. Hanson stated there will be 24 hr, coverage but none of the staff will live there. Ms. Hanson stated they will have a contract with Anoka County that says what their client.characteristics are to be and what their target population is, and they are bound to that contract to accept those clients. They also have the same criteria placed on them by their Rule 36 license they have with the Minnesota Dept. of Human Services. They will get that license before they start the operation, and it is reviewed annually. They will also have a super- vised living facility license from the Minnesota Hea]th Dept, which indicates what type of clients they can take and governs such as aspects as food and medications. They will be able to take clients who are on psychotronic medications. The psychiatric nurse will monitor the medications with the residents. Ms. Gabel asked that when there is minimal staff on weekends, are the staff trained in crisis intervention? Was there an emergency procedure? Ms. Hanson stated all of their staff have to be trained in crisis intervention. She stated that at rtast times, there will be two peopie in the facility. At niqht from 11:00 p.m. - 8:00 a.m.� there will be only one person,but there is always a back-up staff person �iith a beeper who is accessible and can come in. They a�so have an agreement with the hospital for back-up care and will utilize the paramedics and police if the need arises. Ms. Gabel asked about the history Northwest Residence has had in terms of having to call the police. Ms. Wright stated that in the past 1� years, they have had the police on site only twice--once for a situation where a neighborhood person who was alcoholic came on the premises, and one incident where a woman had heart palpitations and thought she was having a heart attack. She stated they have not had to call the police for any internal conflict. This was not to say that it could not happen, but they have been very fortunate in preventing that. Ms. Schnabel asked about the average age span of the clients. Ms. Wright stated for this program they are anticipating clients from ages 18 - 35. 3F PLANNING COMt�1ISSI�N MEETING APRIL 3 1985 � PAGE 7 Mr. Minton stated he had two questions: (1) Could they explain what other suburban cities these kinds of facilities exist in or will exist in in the near future; and (2) Were they given any information on the number of Anoka County residents placed outside the County because of lack of this kind of facility in Anoka County? Ms. Hanson stated Janus Treatment Residence was tn Bloomington. The oth�rs are only getting started. Another program is coming into Bloomington, North- west Residence is moving into Brooklyn Center, and others wi�l be moving into New Nope, Golden Valley, and Eden Prairie. Dakota County and Washington County are each getting a facility. Ms, Wright stated that at the end of February 1984, there were 20 Rule 36 clients out of Anoka County. The avera�e for 1983-84 was 22 clients; and at any one time, the yearly average was figured at approximately 38 clients who could be in need of Rule 36 program. Ms. Schnabel stated she was interested in a few statistics about Janus Treat- ment Residence in terms of how many persons are in that facility and if there have been any requests for police assistance. Ms, Hanson stated Janus is stiii an existing pragram run by Willows Convalescent Centers. It has two four-plex apartment units and has 24 residents, They have less supervision than tfu � program wfll have. They have only one night staff person for both buildings and that staff person sleeps. Otherwise, it was very similar. The residents are aged 18 - 35. While she was there, the calls made were probably one every 2-3 months for either an ambulance or police supaort, and that was for both internal and external kinds of things. There were no incidents involving anyone in the community. Mr. Minton stated some of the objections he has heard Zs that the facility proposed does not have adequate sized parking lot or yard. What was their answer to that? Ms. Hanson stated they would have liked a larger yard. They could not find any place in Anoka County that was perfect, and this was the closest they could get. They would like to have a fenced-in area so there was a place �or a picnic. They will have a program van so they will often go as a group to� other places. They think they will have adequate space for parking. Most of the time, their residents cannot afford cars. At most, there will be six staff at the site at one time. They will have an internal policy that no one will park in front of neighborhood houses. Because they have intensive prograr►ming during the day and most of the residents go to their famiiies' 6omes, most frequently there are not manv visitors. Ms. Hanson stated they had shown a video tape afi the neighborhood meeting entitled, "With Open Arms" made by the Mental Health Advocate Coalition. The first part of the film was about residentia] treatment and had some scenes from another_residential Rule 36 facility. She stated they have had some requests to show this video tape and it might be very.informative for both Comnission members and the people in the audience. Ms. Schnabel stated it wauld be appropriate to show this video tape at this time. 3G PIANNING COMMISSION �EETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 8 Ms. Susan Lentz, 222 Grain Exchange Building, Mpls., stated she was an attorney with the Minnesota Mental Health Law Project. She was at the meeting to speak on behalf of the Mental Health Association of Minnesota which was an affiliate of the National Mental Nealth Asssociation and was a state-wide organization devoted to education and advocacy for and on behalf of inentally i11 people. The Mental Health Association did not ordinarily endorse parti- cular providers, but she was at the meeting to endorce the concept of this Ru]e 36 faci]ity in Anoka County and, specifically. in Fridley, and to encourage the Planning Commission to support the special use permit being considered at this meeting. She stated she h�s worked personally with both Ms. Wright and Ms. Hanson and she felt they were indeed competent and were professionals who could be relied on, who have done excellent jobs in other facilities. Ms. Lentz stated she has aiso been involved in Lhe special use permit process and litigatian about it in a number of communities. She knew the Planning Comnission realized their role was to consider whether the basic criteria for a special use permit have been met and, if so, to grant the permit. She stated they have already heard ample evidence about how this facility will meet various state requireMents, county requirements. and will fit into the neighborhood and will indeed benefit the neighborhood. Ms. Lentz stated Mr. Robinson had spoken to some of the i5sues in terms of state law. The State has set certain criteria that the decisions about allow- ing residentia7 facilities for certain kinds of disabled people are matters of state concern. In this fnstance, if the criteria in the Citv's local ordinance and the State Rule 36 criteria are being met, this facility is entitled to be in this neighborhood. Ms. Lentz stated the Planning Commission was probabiy aware that this was a matter that was litigated, and there was a decision by the Minnesota Board of Appeals a few months ago involving the City of Brook]yn Center. She was involved in that case. In that case, the Board of Appeals noted that facilities for the mentally ill are really a matter of state concern as long as it meets state requirements, and one that should be allowed as long as the various criteria in the City,ar in terms of impact on the external environment,are there. Ms. Marge Otten, 53i1 4th St., handed out to the Planning Comnission membe�s pictures of the building so the Planning Commission members could see the size of the yard and parking lot. She stated she was not opposed to a mental health program for Anoka County. That was not their purpose. They were at the meeting to consider whether this building was the right building to be chosen for the program. She stated she had been chosen by the neighborhood to read a letter addressed to Community Options, Ltd., from Al Kordiak, Chairman of the Anoka County Commissioners, dated March 22, 1985, in which Mr. Kordiak stated he did not think "tF�e decision to locate a facility at 54th and 5th St, was in ti�e best interest of either those to be served or those people who live in the adjoining area". Mr. Kordiak gave his reasons for that statement, and stated he was requesting the Mayor of Fridley, Ed Fitzpatrick, the Councilman representing that district, and Robert Barnette, Councilman-at-Large to support him "in requiring Community Options to select a site that was compatible with the area and one that in fact would have community support". Mr.Kordiak stated he would be willing to help Community Options select a nare appropriate site. 3H PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, i985 PAGE 9 Ms. Schnabei stated the Planning Commission had receiv�d a copy of Mr. Kordiak's letter in thetr agenda inforniation. Ms. Rhonda Peterson, 516 54th Ave., stated she would like to add to the planning Comnission's minutes a letter she had received the previous meeting from A1 Kordiak that was written from George Steiner, Director of Comnunitv Health and Sociai Services Dept, of Anoka County, to Ai Kordiak, dated April 2, 1985. Ms. Peterson stated she operated a group family licensed day care facility two blocks from the proposed site. There were nine licensed day �are providers within a six block radius of the proposed site. She had a concern from the parents of the children she takes care of. They are afraid for their children and some will pull their children out of her day care facility if this Rule. 36 facility goes in. She stated her livelihood was in jeopardy because of this faciiity. Ms. Peterson stated she was not against this program at all. She was an LPN. If there was a need for this in the community, as there was a need for day care, she was all for it, but she was opposed to a site so close to family day care and group family day care which would harm their business relationships. Ms. Peterson stated day care providers have to be above reproach because of their responsibility for the children and the children's care. She stated the day care providers respect and follow those rules, and she could not have the added responsibility of knowing that two blocks away something could happen. She has had her day care license for nine years. Ms. Kathy Prieve, Anoka County Mental Health Advocates Coalition, stated she ha� worked at Rise, Inc., coordinating the mental health program in Anoka County for the last 3� years. She was presently coordinating the program in Hennepin County, While she was working in Anoka County with Anoka County residents, other staff people noticed there were many people receivinq their services but had no ptace to live. They had to live in eit�er downtown St. Paui or Minneapolis, and some in St. Louis Park. She stated there are some people in Fridley who are mentally ill and have a right to service in their own community, They are your family, your neighbors, your friends. Ms. Prieve stated they organized soroe consumers, professionals, and concerned citizens and tried to advocate for change in Anoka County. Over the last 3� years, they have worked with County staff people, city people� and private organizations, to improve the mental health services in the comnunity. Their nwnber one priority since May 1981 was to get a residential facility. They have worked very hard for this, and they think Fridley is the best site. The people of Fridley are very friendly, the community is nice, and the transpor- tation is excellent. This site was close to Rise, Inc., in Spring Lake Park, Central Center for Family Resources in Blaine, and accessible to many medical services. _ Ms. Toni Holcomb, 45 - 106th Ave., stated that every time she had to move, she had to move into Minneapolis or St. Paul, She stated she had worked at 3r PLANNING COMMISSION �EETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PArE 10 D.A.C, with ]ittle children, and no one was worried about her being with the children. Mr. Ray Lafave, 5375 5th St., stated they have gone around the neighborhood Nith a petition, and he wouid like to present this petition to the Planning Comnission. He stated the petition stated t�e following: � "We, the undersigned, petition t�e Fridley City Council and Fridley planning Commission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Comnunity Options, Ltd., for the purpose of using the 4-plex located at 5378-5384 5th St. N.E., Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is unsuitabie because: 1. The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2. There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as we)1 as the adults. 3. The potential for property values to go down. 4. It is a denseiy populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5. It would cause the loss of tenants to area landlords. 6. It would create parking problems in the area. 7. It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8. We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9. It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave., University, and the freeway." Mr. Lafave stated they had a neighborhood meeting and a meeting with Ms. Hanson, so they have been educated about this. He stated he would guess approximately 90% of the neighbors wit�in a three-block radius were against this site for the reasons listed in the petition. Mr. Lafave stated he owns a double bungalow. He lives there and maintains it and plans on raising his family there. He bou�ht his building 8'� years ago with the assumption that there was a multiple dwelling across the street with four families. Now, there will be more people in that building. He stated the people are leary of this program, whether it is prejudice or ignorance, it did not matter. The neighborhood is not necessarily opnosed to the facility, but they feel this is not the proper location for the facility. The building is not adequate. Mr. Lafave stated this is a struggling neighborhood, and many of the home- owners are trying to keep their property values up. This faciiity wi11 not help them at all. Mr. Lafave stated some of these people are self-destructive. They feel this will bring more chaos into the neighborhood. There will be more ambulances in the neighborhood. Mr. Lafave stated there are eight doors in the building. For security reasons there is only going to be one person there at night to assure the neighborhood there will not be any problems. There was no common hallwa,y in the building. 3J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 � PAGE 11 MOTION 8Y l�t. OQUIST, SECONDED BY lYR. NIEISEN� 41D RfiCENS P8'TITIOW NO. �-� 9$,5 UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DSCI.�IRSD TAE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Becky Fink, 1958 - 105th Ave., Coon Rapids, stated she was the Director of the Anoka/McKnight Community Health Support Program. She stated she would like to speak about the need for community-based services. She stated Community Options was very much solicited by the County and through a lot of aro rk by the Mental Health Consortium of Anoka County, which has a number of family members, consumers, policy makers, providers, all of whom felt the need for this service. Ms. Fink stated that when they talk about the need for parents to be able to choose day care sites, she would like to say that in the audience there are family members as well whose children grew up to have mental health problems. These are people living in this cortmunity. As someone who has provided community-based services in the last five years, she has had the opportunity as job placement person for Rise to serve the very people they are talking about here and help get jobs for them in tf�e community. Ms. Fink stated one of the roles of the Anoka/McKnight Foundation is to work on community education, because they know that one in four or one in five are affected by mental illness. She stated there were family �ner��bers at this meeting who would probably not testify that their grown adult children have Aad to move out of the comnunity because of the "mentally ill" stigma. Ms. Fink stated she could understand the concern about safety. They have been operating community-based services in Anoka County for a number of years, and there have not been any safety issues. In terms of ambulances, yes ambulances can appear a number of different times at anyone's home, nursing home, and perhaps a Rule 36 residence. She hoped it was O.K, to call for that type of service if people are in need of ft. Ms. Fink stated that having been involved in the last 12 years in this service they have worked so hard to bring to Anoka County, she wanted to say they were very confident in Community Options Ltd. Anoka County was certainly the last metropolitan county to have its own residence. As someone very concerned about mental iil services, if it has taken them this long to get one here, they fully intend to make this facility one of the best, if not the best, in the State of Minnesota. She would appreciate the Planninq Commission's support of this special use permit. Mr. Jim Nimlos, 625 Dover St., stated he lives just kitty corner from Roma Maloy, who has a foster home for mentally ill adults. He stated he has lived for 2� years at this address, and he has witnessed a couple of ambulances coming to Ms. Roma's home only because he happened to be looking out the window. The ambulances have never caused any disruption to the neighborhood. He stated he has an 8 month old son at home with his wife, and he has absolutely no fear for himself, his wife, or his son in living close to the same type of people who would stay at this Rule 36 facility. 3K PLANNING COMMISSIO�� EETING,APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 12 Ms. Irene Vasecka, 5427 4th St., stated she had called her insurance compa�y and was told her home insurance would go up if this faciiity was put in operation. She stated they, in the Third Ward. received no notices about this special use permit request. Ms. Linda Anderson, 5360 5th St., stated she was out getting petitions signed, and she did not have one person turn her down. She felt this business was a for-profit business, and it was being forced on them. They do not want it and do not need it in this location. There are too many children in the neighborhood. Ms. Roria Maloy, 7995 Broad Ave., stated she was the foster provider mentioned earlier. She stated that, yes, the ambulance has to be called to her house occasionally because she has an epileptic person who lives with her, A concern she had was that Anoka County people have had to travel to Minneapolis and St. Paul. S�e has had girls in her home who have had to go to Minneapolis or St. Paul, and �t has actually torn them apart because they are away f rom their friends, parents, and their community. She stated they seldom get visitors. She stated she also has a day care center across the street from her, and there have never been any problems. In fact, some of her qirls have been asked to babysit children in the comnunity. She stated that in a facility like the Rule 36 facflity, the residents can get far more structured he]p than she is able to provide in her home. Mr. John LaBreche, 1381 Onondaga St., stated he has been a resident of Fridley for nearly eight years. He was Co-Chair of the Anoka County Mental Nealth Advocates Coalition. He was sqeaking in favor of the speciai use permit. He was very interested in this issue because he suffers from mental illness. He has been hospitalized four times in the last ten years. On the other hand, he has been empioyed for the iast six years, has a wife, two small children, and owns his own home. Mr. LaBreche stated he wanted to talk about what he saw as the main issue here. He stated the neighbors near this proposed residence are afraid of inentally ill people. The question was: Is that fear reasonable or not? He stated most people get their information about mental illness from the TV, movies, and newspapers. TV and movies portray mentally ill people as blood thirsty killers. With this type of information, it was no wonder the general public was afraid of the mentally ill. He stated this is not the true picture. He stated that 600,000 peoole in Minnesota will need some tyqe of inental health service this year, over 80,000 of thase are chronicaliy mentally ii1. What pe rcentage of these thousands are dangerous to others or property? He stated i`t is a very small percentage. Even if it is a small percentage, how do they know that some of them might not slip through and be in this facility? He stated the directors of this center will rely on psychiatrists and other professionals in the field to screen out those people with violent histories. There is no guarantee, but tbe track record of the other facilities for these people is clear. The probability of an incident at this facility was quite small. _ Mr, LaBreche stated that from E�is own experience and his own illness, he did not know if he couid communicate to tF►e people who have never been mentally ill how great the need was for such a residence in Anoka County. He stated he was released from the Vets Hospital in Georgfa in July 1975. At that time, 3L PLANNIP�G COMMISSIO�� MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 �� PAGE 13 there was no Rule 36 residence available to him. He was isolated and bewildered by his iliness and thought he would never have a normal life. Ne needed the support of professionals, but more than that, he needed to be with others with experiences like his--a halfway point between the hospital and independence-- in the comnunity close to normal peop]e with normal lives, but with some protection and support. Because he did not have this, he believes his recovery was delayed and his suffering increased. He stated he does liv�e a normal life now as also many others do. The goal of this Rule 36 residential treatment center is to help mentally ill persons achieve as nearly a normal life as possible. The need is great, and he would urge the Planning Comnission to vote in favor of the special use permit. Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Commission members also had a letter Mr. LaBreche had written about his feelings on this subject and urging the Planning Commission to vote favorably for the special use permit. Ms. Sue Jenson, 5384 5th �t., stated she lives in the building proposed for this Rule 36 facility. Everyone is so concerned about these people having a place to live, but what about her? She stated she is a single parent with a small son working 40 hrs. a week. She has found nice people in this neighbor- hood, and she is very comfortable living here. She stated she has never had any contact with mentally ill people and admitted she was very uneducated. But, as a renter, if this special use permit is approved, she would never consider renting from anyone in the neighborhood. She stated that as far as the building, it is in very poor condition. � Ms. Nadine Phillips, i927 Hennepin Ave. S., Minneapolis, stated her ")abel" is chronically mentally ill. She was five years old when she had her first nervous breakdown because of family problems and because in her family she did not learn how to cope. She did not learn what it meant to be angry and not hurt herself, because everyone else was hurting her. So, she started cutting herself. She stated she still has a problem with cutting, but it is not nearly as serious as it was, but it got to the point where she was cutting herself 4-5 times a day. Because she could see the pain on her arm, that pain meant that what was hurting inside made sense. She grew up never �eing able to express any feelings so those feelings got stuffed inside. Ms. Phillips stated later on she got married and had twin sons born with a� lung disease. The responsibility of her sons was totally on her. Her marriage was one of an abusive situation. She got very depressed, put her sons into foster care, and took an overdose. She was admitted to the hosnital and was admitted to the psychiatric ward. In the psychiatric ward� after she got out of intensive care, they began to work with her. Her hospitalization lasted about eight months. She had shock treatments, numerous amounts of medicine, and eventually they decided she should be committed to Anoka State Hospital. Some people from Court Petitioning came and talked to her and asked her if she had ever been through treatment. She stated she had not but just wanted to get well and would give it a try. They recommended to the courts that she be sent to Janus Treatment Residence. When she got to Janus. she was very withdrawn. She was scared, but more than anything else, she was hurting. She was not desperate enough to run out to a park and hurt little c�ildren. No one she was in treatment with would hurt children. • 3M PLANNIP�G COMMISSION N1EETiNG, APRIC 3, 1985 �` PAGE 14 Ms. Phiilips stated she stated one year and three months at Janus. and she learned a lot about what she was all about. She learned it was O.K. to have feelings and learned what her feelings were and how to express those feelings positively. She doesn't have to hurt herself anymore. Ms. Phillips stated she was the kind of individual they were considering wf�ether or not sf�ould live in this cormunity, She stated she does not hart people. Mainly the roedia has made them into "maniacs". The majority of the population that is mentally ill are nat "maniacs". Ms. Phiilips stated tF�at since she got out of Janus about a year ago, she has gotten her GED, has started college full-time studying physical therapy at St. Mary's Jr. Coilege. She stated it is a tough program, but she is makinq it. She takes medications and goes to a psychiatrist two times a week, but she is holding herself together and she is very proud of the accomplishments she has made. She has a long way to go yet to feel good about herself, but nonetheless, she is doing very well, and she would not have had that chance if it were not for a program like Janus Treatment Residence. Mr. Michael Anderson, 5360 5th St., stated there were very few people in this room who were against people with mentai illness and were not against any program. It made him angry when people got up and said he did not care for these people when he did care for people. He objected to the site for this progran, He did not feel this was the right type of building. He felt the building should have a central hali so people can be monitored and get help i f they need i t. Mr. Anderson stated that when he grew up and went to school, he was taught he was living in a democracy and the peopie who tive in an area have a right to govern themselves and have a right to say what happens in their neighborhood. Ms. Janet Nye, 2112 Portland Ave. S., tlinneapolis, stated she lives two doors down from Sentinei Nouse which was viewed on the video tape earlier in the meeting. She stated she has never seen any aggressive activity on the part of the residents who iive there. In fact, she has had some very pleasant conversations with the people who live there. Their house is also the nicest kept house on the block. She was in support of this program, and she felt these people deserved a better chance to have a better life. Mr. An¢y Haechrel, 5367 5th St., stated he was not against the mental health faciiity either, but he fett this buidding was a bad place for it, because of the children, parks in their neighborhood, and they are not accustomed to tf�is type of thing. It was a drastic change for the neighborhood. Ms. Pat Sudlicki, 5380 6th St., stated she has lived at this address for 23 years. She could understand the need for the program. She sympathized with the afflicted and their families. In their neighborhood, because of the multiple dwellings, they have a high density population and parkinq is already at a premium. She was concerned about the parking situation. She was concerned about the fact that the building would have eight doors. How can the building be secure at night with oniy one person on duty? She did 3N PLANNING CONMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3,�1985 � � PAGE 15 not think this was Lhe best building for this program, and the neighborhood did not need the additional problems this type of facility wnuld bring. Mr. Ray Lafave, 5375 5th St., stated he wanted to emphasize to the people in the audience, the Planning Commission, and the City Council that they were in sympathy with those who suffered from mental illness. They were just against the ]ocation of this facility. He was also a proponent for government working for the people and not the people having to listen to the government. He stated the Planning Comnission should not let the attorney present in the audience intimidate their decision. He stated the neighbor- fiood is willing to �ire an attorney to look ir.to the legalities. Ms. Nancy Jorgenson, 5730 Polk St., stated she was President of the Anoka Day Care Association. She had been contacted by several day care providers in the area--there are nine within a six block area. The providers are servicing between 50-75 families. These people, through ignorance or whatever, are going to be necessariiy or unnecessartly alarmed at what is happening in Fridley. There has been media coverage of this and there will be more. Ms. Jorgenson read the letter from George Steiner, Director of the Anoka County Community Health b Social Services Dept., addressed to Al Kordiak dated April 2, 1985, in which Mr, Steiner stated Comnunity Options was responsible for the selection of a site for the Ruie 36 facility, and that the County was not recommending a specific site for this facility. She stated it �as her understanding that the neighborhood had been told that this site. had already been approved by the County. This is not the case. Ms. Jorgenson stated she could not give her opinion as she was representinq the Anoka County Day Care Association, and she has not talked to all nine of the day care providers in this area. She has talked to three who are definitely opposed to this facility for fear of the loss of business. Again, they were looking at putting a commercial business in a residential area. The person with foster care and the day care providers also have businesses, but those businesses are in their homes. She stated she �as worked with ch�ldren with learning disab�lities and special disabilities. She has found these children to be generally quite happy in the environment she provides. She has aiso found that when they do become frustrated ar angry, they do get physical to themselves. Her concern was that children will learn what they live. The children in the neig�borhood are going to learn by what is happening around them, not that someone is necessarily going to physically harm them, but some consideration should be given to the numbers of children in this neighborhood and �ot have a commercial busfness in this residentia] �eighborhood. Mr. Richard Byers, 5300 5t(� St., stated he has lived at tf�is address for 21 years. This proposed facility was a comnercial enterprise dispensinq medication for which tF�ey have to have licensed people, so it was a hospital in form; it was not a residential home. Whether the fear of inentally ill people was founded or unfounded, it is stili fear. There are some older people in the neighborhood who are not going to feel comfortable or safe in tbeir homes. They are not objecting to the program; they are objecting to the location and the q�ality of the aroposed building for this purpose. The huilding is not well constructed and is not in good condition. V3O PLANNING COMMISSION NIEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 � �� PAGE 16 Ms. Terry Buckeridge, 6365 5th St., stated her parents live on the block in question. She grew up feeling this neighborhood was safe. She has a daughter two years old, and she would feel unsafe bringing her daughter over to her parents' home if thfs faciiity goes in. She was not opposed to the program. If the people in question F�ave sporadic mood swings and qo through stages where they are uncontrollable, how do the people in the neighborhood know what these moods are going to be from one mament to the next? There is r.o guarantee there. She grew up in this neighborhood, and she felt it should be kept safe for the people lfving there now and the generatioqs that grew up there. Mr. Jerry Skaare, 5380 5th St., stated he lived in the buildinQ in question. He stated there was barely room for the eight parking areas mentioned by Mr. Robinson. From talking to people in tF�e neighborhood, he had not sensed any resentment to the mentally ill. He believed a large percentage of the people in the neighborhood have been touched by mental illness in their families. He has been. He just felt that if there were other options for the facility in corrnnercial zoning, 20,000 sq. ft, for 14 people seemed to be more appro- priate ti�an 11,000 sq. ft. Mr. Skaare stated that as a resident, there is no f ront yard, and the back yard is all parking lot. The bui]ding is in �eed of a lot of repairs, and the parking lot needs to be replaced. Ms. Marian Crandall, 5370 5th St., stated her back door looks over into the parking lot where they anticipate putting up a privacy fence. With a fence, she wi11 open her back door and feel like she is in prison. She stated she has a family member who is mentally ill, but there are other places for a [LOme for the mentally ill than in a residential area. She was also concerned a�out the parking, especially in the winter time. Mr. Roger Stene, 870 Pandora Dr.,stated he was a sinqie parent of a mentaily ill son. Ne stated he would like to say something about mentally ill peonle. There are a number of them who live riqht in his neighborhood, and he did not think his neighbors even knew it. He stated his son lives with him because there is a 1-5 year waiting list in Hennepin County for these types of residences. These peopie are living among Fridley peopie right now, and thev do not even know it. He stated that regarding the driving and parking situation, if a�person lives in a Rule 36 facility, they usually get $36/month and a bus card. The fear of the extra cars and traffic is comp letely unfounded. He stated in his nefghborhood, the 6iggest pro6lem i� the harassment of the neighbors toa�ards his son, so his son spends most of his time fnside. He stated it really hurt him to hear these things being said about people like his son, and there has been no place like this available for his son. It was better for these people to be � i vi ng �n con�ol led � i tuatfons 1 i�e the �aci 1 i ty prouosed than to be just wal�ing th# stree� when �arents are working and they are alone most of the time. Ms. Susan Lentz stated she wanted to respond to some remarks that were made with reference to her. She stated she was sure the Planninq Comnission would be consulting with their own legai counsei, and she was only there to point out the view of the Mental Health Association. She would like to make a comnent about the fact that this is allegedly a comr�ercial use. She quoted State �] r PLAtJNI��G CONMISSION NIEETING, APRIL � 3, 1985 � � PAGE 17 Statute MS 245.812, Subd. 3, which stated: "Unless otherNise provided in any municipal/county zoninq regulation, a licensed residential faciiity serving from 7 through 16 persons, or a licensed day care facility of children, shall be considered a permitted mult�-family residentia] use of property for purposes of zoning." Ms. Lentz stated that while she could understand the neighborhood's concerns, she wanted to point out a lot of contradictorv information: That this facility was too cTose to traffic; tFiat too much traffic would be created; that there is not enough recreation and yet it is too close to the parks; that there is the potential for property values to decline, yet numerous studies have been done showing there is no decline in property values• on the other hand it has been said that this bu{lding was already in a�eteriorated condition and not good for anyone tc live in. She would lfke to suggest that neighborhood opposition based on stereotypes was not a v11id reason for denyinq the special use permit. She would also like to point out that persons with mental illness are a protected class under the Human Rights Act and cannot be discri�inated against. She stated tF�ere was reference made by someone in the audience that children learn from what they see. She would hope that ch�ldren would learn tolerance from the example of a neighborhood that accep�s a facility like this. Mr. Don Lavin, 180 River Edge Way, stated he was the Program Director for Rise, Inc. Rise, Inc., is a private, non-profit rehabilitation facility iocated in Spring Lake Park. Rise provides job training and job placement assistance for people witf� disabilities living in Anoka County and surrounding comnunities, including Fridley. They have a very proud history of providing services, employment, and job placement support for people with disabilities. They have been serving Fridley for 14 years and have learned quite a bit about people with disabilities includinq mental illness. They have learned it takes good job placement programs, good placement support, and activity with the business community. It also takes stability in the individuals' personal lives and a supportive healthy livinq environment. This is somethinq that has been lacking in this county for some time. Rise supports the development of this residence and looks forward to cooperatinq with them. Ms. Darlene Rusch, 561 63rd Ave., stated she was representing the Social Ministry of St. Williams Catholic Church with does supqort this program in the City of Fridley. She would like to make the follo��ing corments: If not us, who? If not here,where? If not now, Nhen? It has been stated Lhat one out of four people suffer from mental illness. In a city of 30,000 people, she would guess that people in this audience were either touched r�ersonally by mental illness or would be at some point in their lives. Ms. Rusch stated she did not believe people were born wfth mental illness. She believed there was a chemical imbalance in the brain so they cannot function as well as "normal" people. She would venture to say that if they were qoin� to house 14 diabetic people, there would not be nearly the opposition as there _ was at this meeting. Sor�ehow, people can accept someone as a diabetic, but cannot accept a person who, through no fault of his/her own, is mentally ill. No one wants a facility like this in their neighborhood, near their children, near their day care center, near their business or park, so where are these people going to live? Fridley should be big enough to encompass all people. 3Q PLANNING COMMISSION I�EETINGs APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 18 She grieved for the mentally ill and their families, and as a Christian, she would offer them hope, and she hoped the City of Fr�diey would do the same. Mr. Alan Swenson, 5353 4th St., stated he owned the property directly behind the building in question. He did not think this was the tvpe of propertv to be used for this facility. He thought a much better site could be found. There are many children in the area wf�o often go unsupervised to and from the playground down the block. He stated children can be very cruel u�knowingly, and he thought a bad situation could evolve from this. He would recomnend the Planning Commission deny the s�ecial use permit request. Ms. Linda Keating ctated she worked for Rise, Inc., in Spring Lake Park. She was a vocational training supervisor for the chronically mentally iil. She worked with a case load of 20-25 people, 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. She stated these people come exclusively from Anoka County and would like to live �[n Anoka County. They are nice people, and she enjoys workinq with them. They make good employees. She stated she has heard a lot of discussion from the neighbors, and there are some legitimate concerns and legitimate fears, and a lot of the neighbors are willing to admit they are uninformed on this issue. She saw a lot of energy going into trying to keep that information as far away as possible. She would ask them to put as much energy into understanding mental illness and what they should and shouldn't be afraid of, what the program will and will not do, will and will not permit. Ms. Vicky Otis, 5378 5th St., stated she lived in the proposed building site. She stated she had not been aware of this proposal earlier; and now if this special use permit is appreved, four families wi11 be displaced. Ms. Schnabel stated she would now like to give the petitioners an opportunity to respond to concerns and questions. -' Ms. Diane Wright stated she did write down some of the comments and questions and would try to respond to these. She stated this wou�d not be a locked facility. Whether there are six or eight doors would make no difference. Their concern was not on having constant visual contact with the clients. They will not have clients in their facility who need one-on-one supervision. They rely mostiy on peer support; in fact, in a good treatment center, a lot of the treatment is done by the peers and not always exclusively by the treat- ment sLaff. Ms. Wright stated the visual aspects of the property are not of a major concern to them because there are several things they r�eed to do to bring it up to code. They picked the property for the reasons mentioned earlier in the meetinq. Ms. Wrfght stated they are a business and will conduct themselves as a 6usiness; that is a quality they have. However, this will be the clients' residential home, even though for her and Ms. Nanson it is a business. She stated it was important to take the perspective of the residents who will be living there. These people deserve to be in a community-based facility in a residentia� area. Having the facility in a commercial area would not make it community-based care. 3R PLANNING CONMISSIOW MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985� �� PAGE 19 Ms. Wright stated a concern expressed was the explosive nature of the clients. Generally speaking, clients are not explosive at a whim. Usually when a client is starting to decompens�te, the �reatment staff have been aware of the syriptoms over a long period of time, and they can do a lot of preventative things to prevent that episode from occurri�g. They cannot guarantee a crisis will never happen, but their staff are well trained in noticing symptoms�. That is a key part of the program. Ms. Wright stated that as far as parking, it has been their history that maybe one or two clients might have a car. Most of these people live on $35-40/month. At any one time. they will probably only have four staff inembers at the residence and up to six at the most for a special meeting, Ms. Wright stated that as far as the concern about parents and day care centers, she would recommend that rather than the day care providers trying to do the education that the parents be encouraged to visit their facilities. They would be happy to educate the parents that have concerns. Mr. Saba asked Ms. Wright to describe the make-uo of their Community Advisory Council and what kind of authority they would have over this facility. Ms. Wright stated the advisory council was required by state law and requires that members cor�e from a mtx of the comnunity. For example, Northwest Residence has a consumer, a parent, a county social worker, three neighborhood repre- sentatives,including a city official. Occasionally, they can get a psychiatrist or a lawyer on the cour�c�l. She stated the authority of the council is not the sar•ie as a board of directors, but they have the autF�ority to give advice to the program and to the Board of Directors. In her situation, they serve as a grievance panel for her staff and ciients. The councii has full access to statistics, financial data, licensing information, etc. She would assume Ms. Hanson would run this program in the same way. Ms. Hanson stated they would like to have neighborhood volunteers on the council. If there was a large enough group, it would also be nice to have a separate neighborhood advisory board, as w�ll as neighborhood representation on the advisory council, because they feel it is particularly important to have good relationships with the neighborhood. It has been their experience that there is always neighborhood opposition, but fortunately the neighbors become their friends later. She felt this would happen here also. Ms. Hanson stated there would be no sign on the outside of the building. Again, they looked at a lot of buildings and this best fit their needs. It also meets all state requirements. l�IOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. MINTON, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC AEARING ON SP �85-01 BY COMMUNITY OPTIONS, LTD., BY RANAE HANSON. � UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED A2 I1:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION NIEETING APRIL�3 1985��'��' �� PAGE 20 Mr. Oquist stated it was not apparent to him that the building was adequate, but it was adequate by state code. They have heard often that this is not the right site, but he was not sure what the right site really was, and how do they choose the right site? He thought there were times when they� as a City, have to look at the whole and not an isolated area and feel mavbe this is something they have to be responsible for. ' Mr. Oquist stated that in reading over the information, he was not sure they could deny this special use permit based on an interpretation of State law which reads: "Rather, it must be read to permit r�unicipal ities to impose only special health and safety standards appropriate to the characteristics of a partic�lar site...The grant of authority does not permit municipalities to establish special regulations concerning the general welfare of inentally ill adults and thus is not a basis for a special occupancy requirement." MS 245.812). Mr. Oquist stated there was another statement regarding the court case between Northwest Residence, Inv., vs City of Brookl,yn Center which stated: "The Court of Appeals rejected each of these contentions upon a determination that the alleged problems would not be any greater under the proposed use than they would be under uses already permitted by the ordinance." Mr. Oquist stated tF►e contentions taiked about were parking problems, traffic hazards, inadequate recreational facilities, a diminution of enjoyment of adjacent property, that the use was a greater intensiiication of a previous non-conforming use, and the structure was not designed to occupy 18 individuals. Mr. Oquist stated that from a legal standpoint, he did not think they could prove a real safety-type hazard, so he would have to vote in favor of the special use permit. Mr. Saba stated they talk about the people not having a voice. The state statutes that the city is bound by are passed by state legislators, and people often ignore what happens at the state legislature and then complain when they have to live by those state statutes. Ne stated they have to abide by this state statute; however, they can impose stipulations on a specia] use permit. Ms. Schnabel stated that on the basis of the court case in Brooklyn Center, the Planning Commission must be very careful in their decision. They need sone pretty substantial concrete reasons for denial. Mr. Minton stated he w+ou]d also like to express apprec�ation to the two people who have exoerienced mental illness and the father with the mentally il� son for sharing their experiences with those present. He stated he felt that took a lot of courage, because this is a very emotionally-charged meeting. He stated all the residents from the neighborhood have been very careful to note that they are not against the program for the mentally ill, are not against the mentally iil, and felt tf�is kind of program should be somewhere even if it is not in their neighborhood. He felt the objections they have • �eard are objections they would find in any neighborhood in Anoka County. They are legitimate objections. There are fears. Maybe the fears are _._..__..._._�._,..,�._. _ ',-k ' F'%'r`- � X... '3S 3T PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 21 unfounded, but as one gentlement said, founded or unfounded, they are still fears. He stated he felt the Planning Commission has to go beyond these ktnds of interests, because they are representing an element of government-- the city government. They have to go beyond the interests of on1,y a neighbor- hood. They have to consider the interests of t�e entire comnunity, and sometimes they have to think even broader than that. Mr. Minton stated they are talking about a stigma. This country has dealt with stigrr+as af various kinds very well over the past 25 years, and the only wa�1 to address a stigma is to deal with it and not perpetuate it. Based on that, he would have to vote in favor of the special use permit. Mr. Minton stated it appeared to him that �his was a quality program. He felt the fact that it was a private business was a very positive element. He wou�d much rather have this done by contract than by government. He felt many of the fears expressed can be dissipated over time, and it was important to give this program time. He stated that as one person had mentioned, there are numerous studies that indicate that property values do not go down, and he felt they had to give this faciiity a chance. Ms. Gabel stated Mr. Minton had expressed her sentiments very well. She felt they have some social responsibilities, and it is time for them to take a look at those responsibilities. They are talking about some very vulnerable people with speciaT needs that can be met in this community without causing any harm to the health, safety, and welfare of the remainder of the community. She stated the fears are obviously real, but she thought the people could learn to deal with those fear.s. She would be in favor of the special use permit. Mr. Nielsen stated he was in agreement and would vote in favor of the s�ecial use permit. Mr. Kondrick stated he was also in agreement with what was said. He realized it was hard for the people in the neighborhood to accept this, but he could not find a reasonable reason to deny the special use permit request. MOTIDN BY 1�lR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. XONDRICK, TD RECOMMEND TO CITY CDUNCIL APPROVAL OF A REpUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �BS-01, COMMUNITY OPTIONS, LTD., BY RANAE HANSO2V, PER SECTION 205.09.1, C, 5, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALLOW RULE 36 RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM FOR ANOKA COUNTY, ON LOT I AND 2, BLOCK 14, HAMILTON'S ADDITION TO lNECHANICSVILLE� THE SAME BEING 5378-5384 Sth STREET N.E.� WZTX TXE FOLLOf+�ING STIPULATSONS: 1. OPERATION TO BE REVIEWED ANNUALLY WITH A PUBLIC XEARING FOR TXE FIRST TWO YEARS. 2. RESIDENTS WITN AUTOMOBILES BE RESTRICTED TO FIVE OR LESS. 3. REAR YARD TD BE FENCED WITH SZX FODT HIGH SOLID WOOD FENCE. THIS IS TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. 4. PROPOSED ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO INCLUDE CITY REPRESENTATNES (I.E. EUMAN RESOURCES COMIHISSZON l�fEMBER AND/OR POLICE SPECIAL OPERAT�NS DIVISION STAFF). 5. PETITIONER TO PROVIDE A LANDSCAPING PLAN AND INSTALL PRIOR Z1� OCTOBER 32, 1985. 3U PLANNIf�G CdMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 22 6. CONTINGENCY PL�W BE INITIATED WITH UNITY ROSPITAL !b COVER ANY ENERGENCIES. 7. FACILITY WILL COI�lPLY WITH ALL STATE AND COUNTY RULSS 1WD LAWS AND BE FULLY LICENSED. 8. FACILITY WILL COXPLY WITX TXE LOCAL AND STAT'E FIRE G�ODES. 9. CLIENT CHARACTERISTICS WILL BE CONSISTENT WITA PETITIONER'S CONTRACT WITH ANOKA COUNTY. UPON A VpICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWQMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED 2HE 1NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this was a recomnendation to the City Council, and this item would be heard at the City Council on Monday, April 15. Chairwoman Schnabel declared a 15 minute recess at 11:15 p.m. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING RE UEST, ZOA �85-01 BY GERALD G. JOHNSON: Rezone from R-1 one family dwellings and R-3 qeneral multiple dwellin�l and C-1 (local business) to C-2 (generai business), Lot 5, Block 5, and OutZot 1, Donnay's Lakeview Manor , to be used for Comnercial development, genrally located at 5698 West Moore Lake DrTVe N.E. lpTION By !!R. NIN110N, SECONDED BY lIR. 111IELSEN, T1� OPEN TXE PUBLIC IIBARZNG QN ZOA M85-01 9Y GERALD G. JOHNSQN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAII2WOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC NEARING OPEN AT 11:30 P.X. Mr. Robinson stated this property was located south of West Moore Lake Drive and west of Highway 65. The petitioner was requesting � rezoning from R-], R-3,a�d C-1 to C-2. This area was part of a city approved Redevelopment District and, as such, was under consideration from time to time by the HRA for development proposals. The City has been working with r�oad improvements; and if this rezoning is approved, the City would require sor.ie right of way to improve the road system in this area. In addition, they would be improving the turning lanes in that area. 7he City fs in the process of having final working drawings done for this improvement. Mr. Robinson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations: 1. Petitioner to provide the City the necessary right-of-way to make proposed street improvements; to include land for inter- section improvements, cul-de-sac and 60 foot right-af-way for road construction. 2. Outlot 5 shall remain R-1; not to be included in rezoning. 3. Final approval of this rezoning sha11 be contingent upon approval of a s9te plan and p]at consistent with plans and goals in the development district. 3V PLANNING Ct1MMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 23 Mr. Bill Crouch stated he was the attorney for Gerald Johnson. Mr. Johnson was also in the audience. He stated Mr. Johnson purchased this parcel in 1958. This property currently contains three separate zoning classifications, the vast majority of it being R-i. He stated tfiey are requesting a rezoning to C-2. They have no proposed site plan for review and no hidden agenda at thf5 time. Last week Mr. Johnson listed t�e property with a commercial real estate broker to seek developers and/or buyers for the property. Mr. Crauch stated that when Mr, and Mrs. Johnso� first addressed the idea earlier this year of having the property rezoned, it was recommended by the City that they seek out the nearest residents affected by the potential rezoning. They selected 11 homes and property sites, seven on Jackson St. and four on West Moore Lake Drive. These properties were the most directly affected. In late January and early February, Mr. Johnson personally contacted the Owners of these properties. He stated all 11 of these property owners has signed the following petition: "f4y signature on t�is Petition indicates to the City of Fridley that I have met with GERALD G. JOHNSON and have reviewed with him a plat and an aeriai photograph of the above described premises. and that I have no objection to Mr, Johnson's efforts to have the above-referenced property rezoned from R-1 and R-3 to C-2 general business district." MOTION BY MR. NIELSEN, SECONDED BY 1�5. GABEL, TO RECEIVE PETITION NO %'1985. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TNE 1►lOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Crouch stated he understood there weNe a number of things that could be located on this piece of property: a hotel, motel, restaurant, office buildina. But, again, they did not know what a developer would want to do with the property. Mr. Crouch stated that Mr, and Mrs. Johnson have owned the property for about 26 years and to date with the predominate residential zoning, the,y have been unable to do anything with the site. His speculation was that peopTe who might be interested in this site would recognize it as a likely commercial candidate because of its location. He stated he had read the City's Compre- hensive Plan for the 1980's, and it made reference to the highwa,y interchange and this section in particular. It says this property should possibly be comnercial zoning. He stated he and his client feel this property shou]d be zoned comroer;cial and that [w pefully a developer and buyer will find a use for fit that will benefit the entire City of Fridley and its residents. Ms. Kay Ingebrigtsen, 5811 West Moore Lake Drive, stated she questioned why this property should be considered a good piece of corrn�ercial property when there are access problems there already. Mr. Jesse Winter, 5861 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the rezoning of this property to comnercial could only create a greater congestion of traffic than they already have. There are small children in the area, and he objected to the rezoning request. .3W RLANNING COMMISSION NIEE7ING, APRIL 3, 1985 � PAGE 24 Ms. Sad'►e Gunderson, 5707 West Moore Lake Drive, stated she lived right across the street from this property. If this property was rezoned, was there the possibiiity her property would go commercial as she understood Mr. Johnson wanted to buy it. Mr. Crouch stated they are not convinced the proposed road layout is the best for this site, and have considered having someone, either Mr. .lohnson or the City, possibly acquire homes so the cross street to West Moore Lake Drive could be leveled out. That possibility was a long way from being resolved, and they have no intention at this time of doing that. Mr. William Kell, 5675 Jackson St., stated his back yard abuts the Johnson pronerty. He stated the use of the road through there was acceptable to most of the residents. He stated he had signed the petition saying he was in favor of the rezoninq, but he would like to withdraw his name from the petition because at the time he signed, he did not have the information about the City proposaing to cut a road through there. As a solid piece of propertv, he would be in favor of commercial use only with a restricted special use permit, not with a rezo m ng. Mr. Kell stated he would like to see an adequate buffer zone of trees, shrubs, trees, etc., between his property and Mr. Jahnson's and Mr. Johnson signed a paper to that effect. He stated a buffer would decrease the size of that property considerably, and it might not be a viable piece of commercial property. Ms. Schnabel stated that if the street goes through as proposed, and with adequate screening and setbacks, she also wondered if that would ieave enough property to be zoned and developed as comnercial. Mr. Art Olson, 5771 West Moore Lake Drive, stated he was opposed to the rezoning. The residents in this area have been inconvenienced for a long time with traffic from the drive-in, high school, middle school, etc. He did not like the idea that they do not know what would go in on this propertv if it was rezoned. A resident stated the City was rpoposing something they did not know about and that was the street reconfiguration, They were looking at the proposal for rezoning this whole area to C-2. Without a plan, he felt that proposal was premature, and he did not think the Planning Commission should take any action on this request at this time. Ne would oppose the rezoning. Ms. Schnabel stated the only question before the Planning Comnission was the rezoning, not the street configuration. Ms. Betty Papke, 5801 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the Planning Commission would be acting irresponsibly to accept this request without knowing what would go onto that property after it was rezoned, and what impact that development would have on the neighborhaod. She was opposed to the rezoning, Mr. Ross Haidle, 5714 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that in light of the new proposal by the City to put a buffer of homes in there, he would like to withdraw his name from the petition. He signed the petition prior to knowing all the information on what could possibly be done. 3X PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 25 Mr. Joseph Fahey, 5719 West Moore Lake Drive, stated he also signed the petition and would like to aithdraw his name. He could not be in favor of a rezoning when there was no plan for property. Mr, Dick Glumac, 5725 Quincy St., stated he was strictly opposed to the rezoning. The traffic was very bad now, and he did not like the idea of�not knowing what would go on either this property or the drive-in property. Ms. Sadie Gunderson stated she would also like to withdraw her name from the petition. Ms. Gloria Hayes, 840 West Moore Lake Drive, stated she was opposed to the rezoning because they have a iot of comnercial traffic going through there right now. Instead of the drive-in traffic taking the cut-out onto Highway 65, a lot of that traffic goes around West Moore Lake Drive all the way to Highway 65. If this property was rezoned comnercial, they would have that much more traffic. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Krouch and Mr. Johnson if they would like to resQond to these concerns. Mr. Crouch stated his client, Mr. Johnson, would like to table this item for 30-60 days in order to hopefully answer some of the questions and concerns expressed by the neighborhood, MOTZON BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY !!R. KQNDRICK, TO TABLE REZONING REQUEST, ZOA k85-01.BY GERALD G. JOXNSON. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWl71NAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TilE 1�lOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would remain on the table until the petitioner requested it be put back on the agenda, 3. PUBLIC HEARING: RE UEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #85-02, BY er ec ion .., ,, o e r1 ey ity Code, to a ow t e construction of a second accessory building, a 24 foot by 26 foot� detached garage, on Lot 13, Block 3, Brookview Second Addition, the same being 6800 Oakley Street N.E. lMOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING QN SP #85-02 BY ROBERT ANDERSON. UPQN A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOHAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TAE PUBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 12:20 A.M. Mr. Robinson stated the location of this property was on the corner of Oak'ey St, and 68th Ave. The second accessory building will be a 24 ft. by 26 ft. garage to be located on the southwest side of the lot with the drive off 68th Ave. Staff would recommend ihe following stipulations: 3Y PLANNING CONMISSION MEETINGt APRIL"3, 1985 �� PAGE 26 1. Set back garage at least 25 feet or obtain a variance. 2. Provide hard surface driveway; curb cut by City. Mr. Robinson stated the peiitioner would probably be applying for a variance to match the garage setback with the house setback. Mr. Anderson stated the existing attached garage will remain as a garage as he needs the extra garage space. l�lOTION BY MR. KGiNDRICK,�SECONDED BY PII2. OQUIST, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP M85-02 BY ROBERT ANDERSON. UPON A VDICE VO2E, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 22:30 A.M. l�IOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY lNR. MINTON, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY CDUNCIL APPROVAL OF A REQUSS� FOR A SPECIAL USE PERbIIT, SP If85-02, BY ROBERT ANDERSON, PER SECTION 205.07.1� 3� A, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, T1� ALLOW THE CONS2RUCTION OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING, A 24 FOOT BY 26 FOOT DETACXED GARAGE ON LOT 13, BLOCK 3� BROOKVIEW SECOND ADDITION� THE SAPlE BEING 6800 OAKLEY STREET N.E.� WITH THE FOLIAWING STIPULATIONS: 1. SET BACK GARAGE AT LEAST 25 FEET OR OBTAIN A VARIANCE. 2. PROVIDE HARD SURFACE DRIVEWAYp CURB CUT BY CITY. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE NOTION CARRZED UNANIPIOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on April 15. 4. VACATION REQUES an3-uti T'i ty eas and rear of Lot a driveway and 6747 Washington T, SAV #�85-02, BY ARNOLD M. IN HNLY: Vacate the 7 foot drainage ment on tTe Rortl� si�e o� to� T�' and the south 2 feet front 15, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, in order to install erect a garage on the rear of the lot, the same being Street N.E. Mr. Robinson stated this property was located east of Washington St. just south af 68th Ave. 7he request was to vacate a drainage easement in order to install a driveway and erect a garage. The house does sit very close to the lot line (9.7 feet from the corner of the house to the existing lot line). The existing driveway t�hich comes in and abuts the house is presently on the drainage easement. The proposal was to extend that driveway and build the garage. Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations: 1. A drainage plan be coordinated with and approved by Engineerinq staff prior to City Council meeting. 3Z PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL�3,�1985 �� PAGE 27 2. Neighbor to the north provide a letter agreeing to reduced driveway setback and drainage plan. 3. A new ten-foot drainage and utility easement to be provided on southerly 10 feet of lot. Mr. Robinson stated all utility companies have indicated they have no problem with this easement. MOTIDN BY XR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY XR. OQUIST, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACATION REpUEST, SAV �t85-02, BY ARNOLD KVHNLY, T1� VACATE THE 7 FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY BASEINENT ON TXE NORTH SIDE OF LOT I4 AND THE SOUTH 2 FF.ET FRONT AND REAR OF LOT 15� BLOCK 1, RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 4, IN ORDER TO INSTALL A DRNEWAY AND BRSCT A GARAGE ON THE REAR OF THE LO2, THE SAME BEING 6747 WASXINGTON STREET N.E., WITH TXE f1DLLOWING STIPULA'1'IONS: 1. A DRRINAGE PLAN BE COORDINA TED WITX AND APPFtOVED BY ENGINEERING STAFF PRIDR T'D CITY COUNCIL I�ETZNG. 2. NEICXBOR TD THE NORTH PROVIDE A LETTER AGREEING TO REDUCED DRIVEWAY SETBACK AND DRAINAGE PLAIV. 3. A NEW TEN-FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEPlENT TO BE PROVIDED ON SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF LOT. UPON A VOICE Vt�TE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. TABLED 2/27J85: LOT SPLIT L.S. �85-03, BY ROBERT GILSTAD: Split aff e aster y ee , except e ort r y eet o part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25 (see file for legal) to be used as a parking lot for the apartments on Lynde Orive (Moore Lake Apartments Complex). This item to remain tabled until April 17, 1985, at petitioner's request. 6. RECEIVE CONMISSION MEETING MINUTES AND WORKPLAN: MOTIAN BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED 8Y 1►II�i. PlINTQN, TO RECEIVE THE FOLLOWING: HUMAN RESOURCES C0ININISSION WORK PLAN FOR 1985 BUNAN RESOURCES COAAIISSION PlINUTES OF JANUARY 31, 1985 HDUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 14� 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSIAN MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 1985 ENERGY COMlNISSION XINUTES OF FEBRUARY 26, 19B5 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 7� I985 �OUSING & REDEVELOP!lENT AUTHORITY NINUTES OF MARCH 14� 1985 UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCFINABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNIWG CONP�IISSION �EETIN6,'APRIL'3,�1985 �� "� " �� PATE 28 ADJOUR�IMENT: P10TIOIN BY !NR . SABA , SECONDED BY VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOM COAIMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT Respectfully submitted, ,pre Sa a Recording Secretary 3AA 1�2. NIEISEN, TO AA70URN THE !�lEETZNG. UPON A VOICE AN SCHNABBL DECLARED THE APRIL 3� 1985, PLANNING 12:Q5 A.M. 1� ��'/ ^ _ � _ • � „�� . l��!� GG',��.�.�,„- ��-� -� / ��' _ — U � _ _ __ � � �J �''Q �"1C ��'�-'s"'�� :�- � _ - -- - --- .� _ ��:�,� --- ____ ___ � C�G �:��.�---- -- s.; ; . _ �..w..�,� _ �� ✓ ✓��'��ii: i�- /, j� r " ,,��` -=�f,�,•Y. , %%,.� :.�" � �� ,y � ��, .C,N�� 1�,�� ,� L- � . I � ��r,S �t t 7"�J � �'"c�i-.�.�z. .��• . � �,�w � �� ' ::.�. � � �� __ � , / � 1�! � , , � �� , ► - � � /, ! , - � _�_�.' �z _ - - -, . �� S3 S 3 ,'1; F `�� 7 99s�.�-�� s3 7J S.xh�'� �� - --- - - � "��- ` � �' �?.�- _____a.,__ ___ �. . �� _ �_ � ��— � _�--�-�-.-_ � �. �� . s b 7 5 �`� ,>^'� �� 1% G 7jtl �'.,Cc%2� �c�.� ��y� ��y7 �� -��z-- �/�z�� l �� >��- 5``�. � �7 " 5��,.. a ,�,��1<L:- �r��i� Rl 5 �...i, n� c. , r J -- � G�o NE _ L K �,'� L¢v� e f�1 p�; ! � , - � �S_ C,i'.,!►./��-�'.i!1 �-7�- y�%�� 7 3 �� :��x�,- � �i . ��• �� 1�� , / rri a��ey t, � , �J�� Qsf� �� s� , ` �' —. ----�/a? -��.� - - , - -s��o_--:�� --��-�� % _ �`1 ( �/ � � ---- _ �3�----� — ��`��—'1 `- LP ' �—� _ �`33l� __S� ST___JI% — � ��F r _� _____�3�3�r _L_ � �� .� S� � � - � ��;�- � � �-��.d- % � � � A 3CC ,--� . , . . ! .� �-�x. �r ` �-��° ,. , • � � � � �� . , �� :��. G 9� , ti � e� � ��.� �,- _ _ u� . � C� � �� % � ��v,� , Lf�F� �-t � k n4 �-<-- � C"�'.r'N,'1 "'-, i i �G < ��t'�1 ��L �� i��J � � '��r.-G' ' � �-.e/ !%�� ,i x . �� x� ;� � �� S6 TS / ,,� ,V� �%I � • i �C�'�Z�f /�� J L .s�� ,_ � �� ,� .�=�. J�. � . _slf, .� � .i � l �' � I•r J� � �' '/'L"-�,( � �t/'J G'i � 7/y �v ��C �'� ��2. �%7� Lr/- �% DB2'�-l��c�T � � cS7 c�S Q4.�KGy -`� �� j Ls��/- �"�� E �� S'� 4/ LU .{i c�� l�c I%r �-� � � � �--� � �� , �� l�l� Gt/� v'/.�`�2E' �'y�'�% '"�� 58� / (.c� . ��?�e�i.n.- r�L.,�. �l1:� . ��i�. �l"�.�� r� ,��-�, . � . . �- ` �t / -- � , _�; % �- � . �`,.= � w.�� -� - ��-�- � �.�f, ,� . _ %� ' `��dc�. �hc.��C � � �,K �-✓ : �..,'�� , � � ,...i �..`�s �,' r ` ��...� o,.�� j?�1!��l/rw'� � � �'n.0�� 1 ��v�,m�- �c.� � � c�anr�, l.�w�'Z �it °,� �✓ t �� - G � f{ �� ,c u�. ��,� rrts - .� • r.� .iut';l�'l� � � ��2v �',c � � uv d° .[?•� .G�.�J , �° � �`� t--- .�� -� _ � � �1 � C�2,Eu'� �'l tiwst�k Le�ut.'' ��f „ ¢' " � ,,7..r, . �. i � .� �� . �� '6 �� .�� d � � � � � 2��z �'��t C�L.� �5 i1 / ya'7 �n� e�CV� a,c � S/Y1 Z� � z.�' ��.��l��sa.y.y ,�� /'�'�cS G�:.r✓.,,� �-. �-!�'�-c.z,C .��.,�...�. e,c,� -� �- �,- . t�v1v,. �-c•. �c.�c �«` �<< �.: � �..z.. � ��nr� mu n� � � ��`�n� ��o�. � � C�r�rs�� r�, 22 C�r�Ex M�ls S�iS � � �,. $"y a � y�' � � .ss�a s�' o o �, C� •�l� ti,�'�. .� 3l� 3 ��S � � . S S�� / � r � � �� y�� v�� r� � .�. G ;S�r." ,d,/. 7I. £' . -�z.� 5 S�i a / s�d o s� � �l � _ �ss�z/ sz- � s y �-.� �'�� E �-.s-� �, �. 5/ 6 � Y l�-c.+-2. J� . E, � 5 y3! .�3 s� y� ��- � 5� ��z/ S3�s Y��..S�` �Gc.�' SsS�z/ S3o � �s�- �,�- SS YZ � �� Z-� G�., ��' .� ,-� ��, ��di a�t�k�a a s� �f�� , s .� ��-�� -�.� � S�� , a' ` � I �- � C� 71 � ' �� _ �� 57-��f,�,�-1��. y?. f . �:,�.�'� ;�� y.�t /�� .��G� D�° � ��-`L'` e 2 � � � � �,�.�.a� c� �,.. ��j � L� � �c./��--r` U err�/ S�ar�- �� .�'� ��.�-� �� , --�� .�-�'�,��.ti� �� -c��- ��' 1.sz. ��1 �� ,,�..�. �.�.. -� �-�.-�- � .�..�-� 3EE Ss�.f"o ��s� /!!� `3 �7 .5� � �� J �. 53�� S� � 5�� yDd � � s� w £. s.�� .� �r��s� ��/,� /� 2 3 G��z��. ��. / p a 3 �`�o � ��• 3�3g o S� St. N�. �34a �-�5�-, N � � , �� d � �``� �;� -'�' _ � � r �.� � , .fo rG,� ,� //�� L yy � ��c-- S7' iy°` r►� � �16 �� .� .�,, � 80�' �a.��s �`� � �� /G � J � (G D b� � � < < c t 3FF `� ` ) . '' � .%i �- � �j � 3 �,- �- �-r S � P� r-� �"� . ,� ,� , ..%-� .-' � _ • ! !� � '- / .� , ,� �.� ,� � - � � � Y � � �it �c�.�� _ ---- __ __ _-- __. _ _ __ _ - - - - -- ------- -- , �, ,., , ,- �� ' ¢ ��G � � _ .�' -��. ?l_4 . / ` �f--� �J�.o�.o_ _.�5.��- _- " _ �� , - --. __� 3 �.�" �S � _ _ _'j� � . _ _��f.�`�% �'%u�� ' s3 �7----��_'_ �/ __�sT. !�.� ��,,��`� _ ___ _ ____ _--- ------ _ � Ke�,,�l� �, vas - �9a �� ,U� _ _ �,�� 1�.�0�� _ ___�c�.� c sZ.�d�- �� 1��-----______ � �; �II �. - ---_ , _ ,� y �C��- ��' F-'� �-rw �4i C'o u r�� /I/le ►� l�-l� h� �9d L%rx'afPs �� :-►y'rn T"r; d 1 P.� ��s �-��,�____ __ _�y �,�� _ _ _ , ..�. .:�o `yi •� � .. . ��hME S� April 2, 1985 COUNTY OF ANOKA COMMUNITY HEALTH 8� SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOURTH FLOOR COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 • Ext. 1390 Public Health Nursing Services Environmental Hea�th Services Mental Health. Mental Retarda6on. Chemical DeDendency Serv�ces Commissioner Albert A. Kordiak 1117 43 1/2 Ave. N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Commissioner Rordiak: 'Famdy b Children's Services volunteer Serv�ces pevelopmentel Achievement Centers 3GG This letter is in request to your information about Anoka County's involvement _ in the site selection process for a Rule 36 facility. As you are aware, the Community Health and Social Services Department is supporting the need for a Rule 36 facility in Anoka County. This support is based on the needs determination completed during the past year. It identified the need for a 14 bed residence to serve Anoka County clients who are using facilities outside of the county because of a lack of any in the county. Through the Request for Proposal process, Community Options was selected as the vendor for the development of a Rule 36 facility. It is the intent of this department to contract with them for the provision of residential services to Anoka County citizens with mental health problems. The experience of Community Options and their proqram philosophy were major factors in their selection. It is the responsibility of Community Options to select a site for the Rule 36 facility. The county will enter into a contract with them for the provision of services once they have screened potential sites and decided on and secured a location for the facility. The actual site location is determined by the vendor who must request a conditional use permit from the municipality that the potential site is in. This process has to occur between the vendor and the municipality. The county is not recommending a specific site for this facility. We have requested that it be located in an area in which public transportation is available because the majority of the residents in the facility will not have private transportation. Once the selection has been completed, the county will contract with the vendor for the provision of Rule 36 services for Anoka County residents. i hope this information will be helpful to you. If there are further questions, please call. Sincerely, <� eorge�. Steiner Director GJS:rw AHirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer LAW FIRM OF John W. LaBreche Attorney at Law 1381 Onondaga St. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N. E. Fridley, MN 55432 March 29, 1985 Dear Councilmember Virgir�ia Schnabel: , 3HH (612) 784-3637 I am writing to you to urge you to support the granting of a special use permit to Community Options, Ltd., for a Ruie 36 residential mental healtl-. treatmer,t cenLer, Lo be located at 5378-5.i84 Sth St. in Fridley. This item is on the agenda for the April 15th council meeting, and the April 3rd and 4th meetings of the Planning Commission and the Human Resources Commission. I have been a resident of Fridley for the past 6 years. I have also been hospitalized four times in the past ten yPars for mental illness. Thanks to effective medication attd treatment, I lead a normal life. I am employed, a family man, and a homeowner. Fac�2ities such as this Ruie 36 center are absolutely necessary to enable mentally ill people to make the transition, as I have, from the hospital to as close to full independence in the community as possible. The facility will offer treatment plans tailored to the individuals' needs. It will not accept people whose behavior is a danger to persons or property, and it will be supervised around the clock. Before opening it will obtain licenses from severa2 state agencies. Money is not available to make it accessible to the physically handicapped, but some of the County social workers tell me there are • no phv�ic�lly handicapped ;•eor+le on the waiting list for a Rule 36 facility anyway. I believe �;�at �i-.e v�Yusi�.iuri tnat aevelops in a community to such a facility stems from fear based on misinformation. I co-chair the Anoka County Mental Health Advocates Coalition, and one of our . goals is to combat the stigma of inental illness by disseminating the truth about the mentally ill. Recovering mentally ill people need a place to go after the hospital, and it should be right in their own community. This enhances their chances of reintegrating into a normal life. Again, I urge you to vote in favor of the granting of a special use permit for this facility. Sincerely, ��'�,` �v `�°a-��i�.�•�� John W. LaBreche/hbl ' JwZ : hb 1 CITY OF FRIDLEY PET1TlUN CO�VER SHEET Pect r ion N��. $'1985 Date Received April Z0, 1985 objecc In opposition to a Special Use Perr�it (SP #85-01) by Co►�►�unity Options, Ltd. which would a1Tow the use o a p ex ocat'ed-ai 5378-5384 5th Str�et Northeast as a mental health facility. Peti[ion Checked By Date Percent Signing Referred to City Council Disposicion � 311 3JJ We. the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Commission to deny the Special Use Permit�requested by Co�unity Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley - as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un ��s_�� suitable b�ause; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. � 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a d�nsely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5.) It would cause the loss of ter.ants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more s»itable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas. such as 53td �Ave., University and the Freeway. � ddress Televhone ;� �r F � , ��.. � 1�� S 3 3 S� �� ---� �� i;� r- �- � � ;i �� : � /� 4. �� : We, the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Co�ission to deny the Special Use• Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 5th St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site fs un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. ,,,.,�,e Address Telephone 3KK 3 c.� � � � sq 3LL We. the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fzidley Planning Co�ission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas. such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. Name •.. - �I , .�� i �i' � �L/��//.//./� : / •I ��. _ � � _ � � ' , � i � l,c - � .��! - - - � r�r'�'�1li� 1 .,.� ��i�s 7 3 � 3 ��rti '� � -3 - Gw-�.� Telephone .�r� �c�s- S%- ' �Q�.r f-- >%/ -.�L� Z S- � � s�-� �. � ��-��5 � n�� _ 5"� � �>� s � � . � , � - , � .�33� ?l 6� ✓r� — 7 ��_�-��- 63�� - �� a -��69 , � 53�0 -(,'�' ST/!�•E S �� -�o� q ��.� ,t�, s3�� -�� s r. u.�. s�� -�G � L ir:<<i��.7�ils[' �ui��s�r.fi�i� �t,�.�:lr��i�•��.1. i�� s , � . _ - 0 � 0 We, the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Commission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Com�unity Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 5th St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely ponulated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. ' S.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) Zt has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. Al..: �:�.��N.� : . /� , :- � � .. . ! :� ,-, � � , i Address �h Telephone 53n_ 0 5 S� I� �-. �� -�� S� 'O .S �;�1- /✓, f • s � r s.3 A�� , .� � / — S3 �. , �- �� "D/- S3%� � /U�" o s - s.� � � �� 3MM �� -8'l g/ . S?� -�;�iy �"7.z - �z i � 57�-��!/ � �,2 - 9//�s" � 7dt 4�Gz �� ` _ S/7 _ �3 %L /l�o �11 � S% z - �1�''S''.� D.1S�. •� -- f 5�� S 3� a�,.� . ti�= S� � r J �i.� :_ s`� ' 3NN We� the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Commission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E Fridley • as a mental health facility. We belfeve this site is un- suitable beq�use; . 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a denseiy populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of tenar.ts to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has Iittle or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. . Name Address Telephone ��/l ��'!'- �� S7� -8/ %�.� � 3 00 We. the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Co�ission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; l.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighbarhood. 5.) It would cause the Ioss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas. such as 53rd Ave.� University and the Freeway. �i:�-�. �Y_ ,�ti��eti�► sys� �K�-t. �J. E. _ � ��- - �" S-yo �1,�__��.�-��sa ��'.��. � . �� `j'�"'t� �;��L ��_ �f�S2 l,c1�r �UF • � %t - C`j-f�2 _ l. - ', T, ! �''T . � � - /l , ,1.1s'�t1�_j �i11 rl � �� (C�ul�i �13v �`�" S-1, nl�. S7� � �l�°_ _ � -- - � a..., `�l �e,� r - ^ •, , , � �� i /� 5 � c; 'Z'? ff S 7yda -S'�`S�,NL: �:�� r c�1. �' � . � — t' � ; �/ G c: a � �, �� ' � .:��'L_ /_.,�.':-� '�/�; ; ; 1 1 .---y, ' �_- ;-fi - �:. �.,- , /�. - .� � { 1�+��Ii - _ - �� .�,� /,�,-.� ,�.� � / — _ � G .. C` We. the undersigned. petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Co�ission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Com�unity Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley • as a mental health facility. We believe this Bite ie un- s�}table because; • 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4._) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords . 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas� such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. Name Address Telephone �l�.,,..�.�.,.. S � oZ - �.�c^�� Z - >�s �� /� �o%�%L i 57�-9-Z�� 72-Slc� 57� .�a�► - - � We. the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Commission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Co�unity Options; Ltd. for the purpose� of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. �, 4.) It is a densely populated'area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traff ic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use.• 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave.. University and the Freeway. Name Address Telephone .� �►�,� ,i� C77- 3QQ - - C� , /� .. . . . � .. � 511 �� '��.� � 5�2L�3 f I �� _ � � � sst�'` A,,� � �� ,�'7� -�� s 7 v-9 �� `� �.C� a•�. � - �'� d'/ �Q.�C-�-�+� S" .7� � � _ �"._ _ �..�.;. ,r�w. - ` ��_,Y�e„O�.Sr�+^� —. ._ _-.._,- � -- z'Re� �.• z. . si • . �u ... ...-►o .. . -,: �.... . -- � We, the undersigned� petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Co�ission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Co�unity �ptions; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at �378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitab2e because; l.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2. ) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard azea for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is c2ose to busy traffic areas� such as 53rd Ave.. Universitq and the Freeway. Name Address �„ ,� � _ �-z�,�� . y�; � ... -rr_,► G 'v C• i �'�, .� vti. ��.-'-r`'^-a'.9'�� S'G r ` - S' T� � l �4 . � �-?�►�:.� �, l� �.►_,�-rc 5 L: � � - � <.:�. � � ` ,�� n,et '( � � p4 -__� � s r �r � d � S� .� - Telephone K ' '� // lu �S.r � .�i��"!l 2��. __ ��".E �r .� JG/ s.y ��.�r :<..�.�:._}� � �1 t � b � C� �-l� �/� �=- -- ��- � - � �' h�-'� �/_ /. �: - •; �4 _l � J��. • � �� S-� s �- S .� /YC d �r�R°�' _ C�, _s'�[i,�,(,.,.��::, .� �. h b" �ti -�� . �t �. �. � .'�� -''��=',.;.� �� 3'� 57� ��f `». . . — —r► -�_'arsa..�-� 4a"s 'we� ..a.�.t�.. ,�v r_ . -.a.�+..0 �..- . ;. ..: � � ♦- -.. • � . �� We� the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council an;d the Fridley Planning Cou�is�ion to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of' using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 5th St. N.E.Fridley a:; a IDental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable b�ause; l.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2. ) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of ten4nts to area land- lords . 6.) It would create parking pzoble�ns in the area. 7.) It has little or�no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traff ic areas, such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. rlame _ x � - i .-�c � .� . . s' (,.� �ddres � l '1.-Z � �k _ - c '-.,`,� /„ : ��. sy�:. f �� !V� `�y � 5 �//a - s S-f � �t► � �10- �` �N• �- . _� v� � i SL�lZ1 /t/E S ��Sf1�/��, � .,�� U v� �aa �fi�� s�- �,� . � � _._ . 1� S y3D S � �rr. Telephone l �'� `�'C� ,_ 7�` � �� `� ,S 7�- 9�7 i — ��U ��-,3�3 s?I-7s�t �- ��v 3SS �/! � • . ^ r � 1 � � . � . � - -- � �1 l / " i ' # �� r ti. . � �... ��i11.1 � � -v�-c_�. J i�S� ,j ; /rS � /'I C �S �7 � _ �l � " (" �'_ _ �� ,�`'�' . �i�cr•�� iLe� l3(�5-_5�,dt�tJ� 57� �5yo � � � . 3 TT We, the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council ancl the Fridley Planning Coa�ission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 p2ex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental healtb facility. �le believe this site is un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children 4.) S.) 7.j 8.) 9.) in the azea as well as the adults. The potential for property values to go down. It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traff ic is not needed in the neighborhood. Zt would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. It would create parking problems in the area. It has little or no yard area for patient We believe a more suitable location can be elsewhere in Anoka Coun�y. `�t is close to busy treffic areas. such as Ave., University and the Freeway. use. f ound 53rd Naz�e Address Telephone ... r.f �r..-sis-� Rs!•'rae�a�-� ..sa�.i...sc v�r-�►vwl��-wt� �-�- =r' � �'...;'s.'-a�'_•_r_.:�.•_...�.. _ _ . ._ -'�c . .. . • y _ � ' ' . . Z: � We. the undersigned. petition the Fridley City Council F�nd the Fridley Planning Con�ission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Co�unity Options; Ltd. for the purpose c►f using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley F�s a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- f:uitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for prope�ty values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found eisewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. 1•. m e Address Telephone _� —P _, - � _ �'iC�'� �---�r�—� i � -4' -G�_�� • �'� _ �S J'� �/ ' ,�' J - -, , �.7,]�' s! � '�.'�'�' _ /.l�._ S(( J�r _- -Y` �._ 1 3UU �� - �'/,� .P' =� --�c " � � � = /," — � \ _ �� z 6G �cc��-,.�.,....... �.�,.��.t,.� '7 '] l-, SX � /4-t� li% . S �� 1� S3v S yS�" ilir" 72 - �� 0 We, the undersigned� petition the Fridley City Council ar:d the Fridley Planning Commission to deny the Special Use PE�rmit requested by Comanunity Options; Ltd. for the purpose oi` using the 4 ple�c located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley a�> a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; l.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the erea as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for pzoperty values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area Iand- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53z'd Ave.. University and the Freeway,. Name i, Address S 3 �{/ I1(.c;/ifn, y'• 53�1) (��c�� ,� -. s 3 3 ��,� 3VV Telephone �70� � �c�'P� .5 `7�� %,� s7z-92�i � .��..�...�.— - - - �. y�.-. ��. .�....��.�-.�.�..�.�, wr +... � ...... � - �' �. ._. . .r �.. - .., . �e ^� . . �- .�. . . 0 We� the undersigned� petition the Fridley City Counci�l a�nd the Fridley Planning Com�ission to deny the Special Use P�ermit requested by Co�unity Options; Ltd. for the purpose o;f using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- s�uitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children. in the area as well as the adults, 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas� such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. � .- �- Address ` S�4 - � � `-�-�� , _ � s/�' J3 � u� � . • J ; .± - - - �ria..�, �,.,�,,, S-� �' - s .-4. ��. �--- 'S z 1 S 4-T K�Qv E�► E �� / �;�/i,lc � =i / s�Y��-iC.� �'/� � ,.5�-'� �.-� . r;_.� /�/_ 3WW Telephone 5��3- �'��,2U ,5� >> %�� ;..5"�� - 90� � S%-�-90%� SlZ-92�L > % - `%� %L � _ sJ7.�- �.zi� � 0 0 � We, the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planning Com�ission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property va2ues to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords . 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location c�n be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas� such as 53rd Ave.� University and the Freeway. lla�ne Address Telephone 3XX � iA . . �� -..� .'� ,�31 �� '�; i ) � �-. _, �i`I� - � = • �. , .: ,` �� _ <�-.�.5"2� 3YY We, the undersigned. petition the Fridley City Council amd the Fridley Planning Commission to deny the Special Use P�ermit requested by ComQnunity Options; Ltd. for the purpose o:f usir►g the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- s�uitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords . 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Arioka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas� such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. rlame Address Telephone ��rn�.fG� �v �'l�aa� r�. S�0 S�+Sf. NE F��d�w C�ri) S'sq-�t«�/ _�.q� ��a s�5� �v ,� . 5'1� -�$l� We. the undersigned� petitioa the Fridley City Council snd the Fridley Plaruiing Coa�ission to deny the Specisl Use Permit requested by Community Options; itd. for the purpose �f using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley ,es a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as Well as the adults. �3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a denseiy populated srea due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. 5.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas� such as 53rd Ave.� University and the Freeway. Address Te2ephone 3ZZ � � .t -- `. �..�_1��.� �= �'�.� � � �� ,�%� � � i � We, the undersigned. petition the Fridley City Council an�d the.Fridley Planning Co�ission to deny the Special Use Pe;rmit zequested by Community �pt�ons; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.Fridley as a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- suitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residential azea is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children in the area as well as the adults. 3.) The potential for property values to go down. 4.) It is a densely populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traff ic is not needed in the neighborhood. S.) It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. 6.) It would create parking problems in the area. 7.) It has little or no yard area for patient use. - 8.) We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in Anoka County. 9.) It is close to busy traffic areas� such as 53rd Ave., University and the Freeway. / Name � �' �- ;�- � � ; : . f}, �y l � ;, ^ ` �-'-1` �=�a>et!' n Addre s S C� / � �`' SJ. /j/ �' , �r�:....�.. SZ a i- S�Sf_ 7J � 1�(/�� << '3AAA Tele hone 7�- �50 57/-ysj`1 � _.� ...__,..��„ �,i< _ -- --.�..-�..�..,.�- _1. -f-- •:.�, ti _ — -, � ---- u. _ . -„ _ - -. � . . - We, the undersigned, petition the Fridley City Council and the Fridley Planriing Commission to deny the Special Use Permit requested by Community Options; Ltd. for the purpose of using the 4 plex located at 5378-5384 Sth St. N.E.�Fridley es a mental health facility. We believe this site is un- svitable because; 1.) The idea of having a business in a residentfal area is undesirable. 2.) There is fear for the safety of the many children �3 . ) 4.) S.) 7.) 6.) 9.) Name in the area as well as the adults. The potential for property values to go down. It is a denseiy populated area due to the many multiple dwellings and more traffic is not needed in the neighborhood. It would cause the loss of tenants to area land- lords. It would create parking problems in the area. It has little or no yard area for patient use. We believe a more suitable location can be found elsewhere in �.�ka County. It is close to busy traffic areas, such as 53rd Ave.� University and the Freeway. Address Telephone S7 /-6� � � .��1cr��lr ��,/J�� .5 3�5 -/,,� Sf' �7S/ 9��/ S37s �`'„ � �7� �� J7a-�9 .� � oZ -� � Oq `'`1 3 EEE PROPOSED STIPULATIONS SP #85-01 COMMUNITY OPTIONS, LTD, 1. OPEI�ATION TO BE REVIEWED ANNUALLY WITH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE FIR;ST TWO YEARS. Z� RESIDENTS WITH AU70MOBILES BE RESTRICTED TO FIVE OR LESS� 3. REaR YARD TO BE FENCED WITH SIX F00T HIGH SOLID WOOD FENCE. THIS IS TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. 4. PETITIONER TO PROVIDE A LANDSCAPING PLAN AND INSTALL PRIOR TO OcTOaER 31, 1985. S. PROPOSED ADYISORY COMMITTEE TO INCLUDE CITY REPRESEN7ATIVES iI.E. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEMBER AND/OR POLICE SPECIAL OPERATIONS DIVISION STAFF). , 6� CONTINGENCY PLAN BE INITIATED WITH UNITY HOSPITAL TO COVER ANY EMERGENCIES� %� FACILITY WILI COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AMD COUNTY RULES AND LAWS AND BE FULLY LICENSED. H� FAC:ILITY WILL COMPl.Y WITH THE LOCAL AND STATE FIRE CODES. 9� CLIENT CHARACTERISTICS WJLL BE CONSISTENT W1TH RULE 36 PROGRAM GUIDELINES �I.E� INDIVIDUALS WHO DO NOT EXHIBIT BEHAVIOR THAT IS HARMFUL TO THEMSELVES OR OTHERS)� EC. /4, T. 30, R. 2 4 irY oF fRi��cEr .-, i/ � � `r . � Kuhnly 3FFF ('►�rs�s.�c..-._•—c+,. xu� -s:.s I 1►i�' �N!Y Ni •.« 1�1C`�� C7Y'h I I JfIKlS YrYt.NC •:R �RE� yq.vN 7wS ��+�NG �S f0 !E US(D O►�l� ►OR �EFE�ENCE KA'OSES AM.^ trif C�W I r► K �Or �ESrcwLUf r�r u:r u+ .«,,..�,.s ��, �� i � 5.39/4 i `.- rt co��t� +►w tM�r• ..o K� SS• _ � �• '� �_ �, ;. ��_� � ��_ .,� �BR OKV/E;W , I•i �� _;�� .f ,f, � 7 . MI'� �r � ,. w , � ' ..- r� • 1 . � . +s ! � � • � � e, L �i � R10E i CREEK TERRIICE r -•�"� �,• `/' / "' /, �. • 4 . � ' • ' � a"'�• t � r ��(/ �/' ,• ��t��s, „� o, .ss.{,�.,�:�"i�i�,.."s ,�, •.C.. � , f_ 'i�i �' t w.ir--i-�:' �,' cl•1-•s�:S•"'••?�O - 's' `rrv,' �r� �•;I ' ' � �; � ,'; 'i�T�£RRA�c:r�ir�`nire ��'�"�' • = • .• �; . y� � : � j ` r •� 1 � �' � � ' . '.�. ! , 1[ � f`�'✓� ti 'J�� .i.. t:, • r r �.i ' n� % ...� ^, w • ♦. ' r��`� ��• e• � r � r- i � • MNOOR� , CRNE, ` • �. V - / �� ' �' i ' �� `r '.+..�-� . �z�� r..� �� y, �t� r�.%� � � N��g.:�,��i��•a'��a��• "� : 1 I� �, i r . � . . .. � ? 7 •' �t �' M t• 1 .� ��+ • � `' • ` I f�� J i ' �� ' �.� , . :,� . . . � ... 5� ��,:•,.�:-,;:-,; �Q-. 1'- r•,°`' <� v�t� !� �• i � � � � �� i.l.sli�1,� 'B��-�.:�a�en;i,• l•:. � f-�' • , „ �. , �l �►: : -'! . . , i ti.... .�� c . r � . ;+ , 'i ' s` „ ' �e `, \ f �� MT �2� � � ,1 e RTON . ORNE �y '� ,'` '3•�' � w ..w .s" ..� `�l ` t •J, r; , �e� . ��DI I ••;� • !`` T • {{ �� 't � � •� - n. � ? ~/� i. 1' I 1 i � �+.{�-v. �,`�� • �= ..� :' ' ` �CR�� I � _ -B,�OdI�VfEI�. �.�,�� j�'�• ; Po�. �h' -., v �'! � • '-.� � �� • �� r "� R . � KENNASTON O �V •� i� t'0'��, 2O _ d�,. , t _ �v. ,� � x � �� o ` . � ' !•f' a t � � �. , '6 • t' •r� .� 1v v � :r < �.'Z •,•�sL•�!♦9+5�1•1• ��i �►t��: ' ,'.`s S rh - r1 t' .� : • - ,i -i r� . r�-.!� • .� y"y • .'�,,.�. !'. a'..+ a� -s— �.r � r r .� rw �� ` , ... . O . ; y . �r, � , •• ,Ll7 +. I ! ,r � � S i \ � � +� s 1 .v'1 , r 1 �I 1 r � i 7 � � • - �� yE � " ; * .: r� � - ilTM AVf. N_E ._ +•' ,,n." ...�� , ' � �'�"�� .� .. � ..�; � � ` ' ' ' � 1 ; ' �, �./G - S � . o' t�t �� ♦.4��, -ru �Ic �' +y -s• • � �e' i t J, '.r/�IL WLA7VbS � � w.. P.j ~ _�a �_ �%' �� J�. � 'u..m-- . f 2 i I! • 2 � • . 1. ! �`J� .r - � 1 : • 2 � ; -� .� ..r �f � I . � � 1. � .� '� � �� ,�.. h �__� d f J f �Gi N � �. �� '� . '.1 "� :'t� p J t � � �3 .,� t ; � t . . c,•,. � �,, �t � � W ♦ � � - � ' �/ � �, _ E N � s r a .` . 'o� - ....r. ; V `- � ~�� •v � 1,. • . . !(�, ,,.•• . ,•,. < sr . � • �r i� a w�r = vt � ' � y ` � f i • Z .r.� s � � a s � �t I : � i � :• N � _ -� � -'_ � ; � �� f y_ -.r � W 1 i • ' < w � -� ,,, � „ !" , , s o - ,s . � , t . �` ' N 6 /4,Q8. ; •i� { i ♦•.'! �i 1 ��s ; �e� � � 6 � � _,.r� ,.�, � � �i '�`ti. ; j � ,1 �=j � . �VE. N.E. • { " s " _ � :� z'e, � � � ',�, yi�' � . . �._ � • , M, 1! i � : 1 s .�..�.�..- ,N. ��;�� •:y {w�si1lr��si•i�1:a e� ;`��%�' .. � � .. . � ` _ ' � " `6�L� b�.YE� �` .� ; 4 � �;�, '}� R �R. F � wT �EX- z � � • t �� = s l�� 1-�'3 �'� s � a -� ' ACE � � f E t � . s � ,� � , t = � ' .vE. N.e. » - ' S ,.. ��°:�.�.�...�., p . ��F $ �ItEAO �.;�qibQS � L• �E G �. .,. : - . � • _ ��A� �: � . t �f= . R� � i�� 5 � �` �._ a� '� n..: � � t6TM AVE. .E. . � � . . _ P Fr------ � s �—a - ; � �' . i • � � � ; � _.... : - - � : � � � 1 � � 1 = c�ove :2 ,� 7 �o: i � � _ . _ � .._._ .t K.a=i, ,r�ERR�C�� '- ~"� P�.A�'!y2'.� . � 6 ' �„' O ; , , � f . ,,. ; - � . � ,�p� � !�' ' � � � �1 TI q11� . N < . � . � ... F�. �,,�.s.. ... y MIS515S1pPi.�al�REET "' - �u — •--••• _ • ��, � - -��e 4 ctrtt�: o• c � �1 � j�c ' �� ' fOLIMO W ANDEffON,,.-r � \ / ' `� COtM�s SWvErM � � .. LIDCATlON MAP �� "'� ' ,. ,.,....•.,., �- ` ! . � � � J • / Kuhn+ly �j�� (/�: ` \/\(��)� G , '' l ' �/ 1 \ ';tiT `J/ . \ ' � 1 , • � . � �� / � `\ �'% �- w� r � � v ` . .� `� � ►:s�_ ;� � r ) _ . • 1 ,Je � ' J ' �p �E--�7 � " '�"y . 25 ' � _ � O • � � . �► 2 � a 0 D � \ • d � • � ,; ' � � ,�` _ s `� Q �'- a , / � � ,` , , . � �^ , '� . -_'�� .`� � � .�° ' -- . ��'' � -= '— � cc�� ` _ '' . r �. . � 7 � ', , - - � v, � � � , , � y � � � •/ 1 ; n � � , r; '/ r , 1. S � f. � C ` � .: :) � � ��' �i� � � �v � � p � �, r' s �� „ . c� � . � � � �'� ., : V �`� l?`J O • �� " { °P __-1 � �. O �� 4�� `', u G' •��~� � ,�. ►, �E � I v �I /n � . _ ' � 4p • O v/ . _� �� ; r m� V '• _'n / G7 ��- — . �% 2s n . �� i _ t. , � 1` 1 c -� r_ `,_ n � •� r �P � �/ti ` , � � • •�- �, `� ~�O '� � ' I � � . � � r � � � t Z� , _ .. w 3/� ' � �f . , Qi �'n� - — , -- , , �- . \ � � ' , ' �, r � � p � � 6 � _ �f1 . N . ;� ,v C� � � , � �/� N ' O . �� . �� _ a-• _ , t' VI . � . ! , . � t �. . � , � M � � W _ � o 1 — I r .� �. N.i �, • � � N2 ��caF�, ° 7�� 9 y 4i �� / �?7 v � C, '�.T.3+! t L� = -�� - — = =�.r�s Y. 2 9e e 5 242 _ - -- - - . %� —� • x _ "S. l j �• �..,�.. � . . � � .t • p• _♦ j � 6 �j �oS ��o� j � � t' '�A:" ,t' '0- ':f :� ! _ . .� � . - 8 ` i •• � • �1 �_. .1. '` �T/1 � .i , f► r t • . - ia � 9 ' � � y' i '' 7 7� ..y.. '�'!••} i � i O '� �� '_. + � ` .�/" � . � �w +;., - � ' '_j ,'.�.�_ �.. � '.� i fi' - -� . '.•: � 4.� t ]. �i ��. • — �_ _ • � d.._ . _ _ � . . . � �`+� � �, ' � . � , • � l � • • _r � \ '- � � , _ i " j � - � � � � � f• � • / . • • � � i , . .' 1� � . } y �� • . �1 � ��'j .�� T �� + "r' "� �- �� - t) � � t { , � �j " �' - � • • . . � . N�j 1 a. r� ; [iv y .�� ' �Y ) � • � ^: . � � �1 L �,' i �' tr :� ,.' • � . � ��•'; L T:•.� .i t��.;�: •,� 1 �- �t, •if,t�� • '�. ' t_ 1_ ��- f. .' t 'i . ! • •/t r �. + Ryi'ri.:+.l.i S � i • � .4 � � •. j , � i � � . : •r�. ' �- . . ; = i � - �f � �i�i n ��' V''ti t �� )� . � t � � !d � - =�s " + * '-�` � "; � ' - � . . � ,- . • ai./�� w� �+n : � t�� ..; � ��: -%�: +•t •� . .• `� - � .. �' .' . - t . . � "7 , _ - . . � , � . . � . . .-----�1J��'��- --14I2� _-�_ --.. _ , . �,'t • , a . r• � . . �. �� . r .y �i1�IH �_�;�: i�,. � . � R ^�� • ., � � � ��iF � . < . . ,r lanePrar�r� �lS fl,�li�'i�l �E. ��l _ . � A�rr�lt � : �'�'� ENG I,NEERI NG; t�1C. ��°,� rM+a� �r�r , . � .�r��co�c • i�� — En ineers � Sur ve ors -- �� 9 •� y � . H- ��. � cer*�iFicate o� ♦ .� s � , . \� - `' � ':��' 1 � � � � � I� ► �J i � ,JI� -- -- C1 � � . � 'J �u��e ��! ��•�� r 'r]L lJ ��/f�%1 !. �f� � �� \� � l\ ' h �� ``�. � .� � C� ,t,� � � � ,` v t� ;� L �.�`, �0 � . �l ;, `} € C • � ;. � ` ;'�j` �f � �� `�t,' �� ,. , � � �� r� � • �C� �, � �; � �, � ; �. � •,, 0 . � . � � : .. .� � � . � rti � • � L, .` ` � \�!i�' , .�: � .. � . - � �� o r . . �`.\/ � � � � ' ! �,�,'^'�ti �.1� C�' i , � , ' , . r, � ` . . \ . • ' • • ::• . . • {+ + �� r v ' �` ,�r ,�� i �� - •••• ��• ��i� � � T v'\ T \ A . .. L .'\ a. , �- �,,: _ _ � . . ,•� � � �y,,,yy,y�� r � � �/ `C� r \. � �\; : ��' � \� �*. `�. �� F�\ V 4 �� % � � �''''' � � � � • • • ' ' � ' .;r c� , �' • ;. ;:; .;;, . ,,�,. .��"''" � ' ' = � :• . . � � �' � ^ �� ,� ' i r� r � Q ,1 ? �. .. , �� . r f � . , � �i � "� . � � . � . , ti* ! MM ( \` , ' '; �. : t� ►: � �r �j-_ - • a f t � � � �: � I , • �� l� . , r ' ' `, I � t f • � - _�` �1 ^�'/ .� _�.. -----�•� w�/•�tt•�= �i �' �x1 �Q [so!!� f!7v�ir.•:f �� /!�.%'.XK,/�L!� G .1i! � r i � �'�`" � �s � , < � -�``� �r �� i �:.�1 7t y �,��': �7�7��L I � �� 7 �/� �! s - �. � : �,�,r� D /��; �l� C�/= � U l /� , �L::C,� 1 � . � f�� l� � c:/2�=C/� l� /�� CL= � T 4 -'- - � L,/� � .:�u,�%TY vti, o,�J,�r�i i l�endy urrl�'y Ab/ � s� IFut oad mrrzcf i�sa�otio�'('i s�ntt` �'l1Srr b�w,�•,i�s �Ar ��ci+l�d land, ad �ll�e kr�lfari �( itl' b�ild:�S . Airrtrn ,�d �f/ risiddt dwnorl�►e�d c, nl'i�/. �('i�rn r n s� load. As s�v'nryed �/ � J14i�_��- A�/ "� �. � � r A.ii �il�f • � - . svauQ�UV EN��aEE�?dv�, nvc. " s Jf'r S�r7�s -� , � f.,�� / �i - �/C..-[• 'v� i � ;�� . • /�_� �i D�_ . �/ �4_ _ . � • `�.,y �a, . z �..�.' w. . _ . .• . � �.ii� . ..�..} � _ � .rr. •.�wr.r -... .....'..� _ ... .w �►-r.....� �.. _ s�.w. ..aa.. t�k� = � CITY OF FRIDLEY CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION INFORMAI MEETING, MARCH 19. 1985 CALL 1�0 ORDER: � Yice-Chairperson Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:14 p.e. ROLL t:Al L : Membei�s Present: Duane Peterson, Burt Weaver, R;lph Stouffer. Ed Kaspszak, � Barbara Hughes (arr. 7:30 p.m. . Membeirs Absent: None Other:> Present: Clyde Moravetz, City of Fridley APPRO'VAL OF AGENDA: MOTIDI!V By IyR. STOUFFER, SECO;NDED BY 11R. WEAVER� RIO APPROVE TXE .10ENDA WITH TXE C�RRECTION TilAT ITEM N1,"FREE REFRANCHISING DISCUSSION" BE CXANGED T1� "PRE-iREFRANCHISING DISCUSSIOW"• UPON ,A VDICE VOTE, 11LL VOTZNG AYE, VICE-CXAIRPERSQN PETERSON DECLARED THE MO:'IOJN CARRIED UNANIPlDUSLY. 1. PRE-FRANCHISING DISCUSSION: Mr. Moravetz stated the Commissioners had received a copy of the Cable Comnunications Policy Act of 1984. He stated the Comnissioners miqht want to review that Policy Act over the next several months. On April 29th, the FCC is supposed to be coming out with further mandates in conjunction wiLh this Palicy Act. Mr. Moravetz sta�ed the franchise expires in December 1987. It was recomnended that the re-franchising process should begin somewhere between 24-30 months before tF�at date. M�r. Moravetz stated they should submit letters to the various civic groups indicating an upcoming public hearing at which they can give their input, and then the Comnission should set a public hearing date. The public hearing should be scheduled sometime this year or eariy 1986. He stated at the last re-franchising in late 1981 or early 1982, the Cornrnission solicited and got the league of Women Voters to conduct a survey. It was a random t,elephone survey of 1,Q00 citizens, of which 12-14� responded. They also r�eceived written input from the schools. Anoka County Library, and the ACCW. Mlr. Moravetz stated that, as was done in the past, they should probably s�cheduie a meeting, fornwl or informal, with the City Cobncii i� order to get a� sense of direction from the Council. One question they could ask was: Obes the City Council want to go pretty nwch status quo with another 5 year e:xtension with the basic 300 megahertz system, 35 channel tapactty? He felt � 4A CATV COMMISSION MEE7ING, MARCH 19,�1985 � � � PAGE 2 if tf�e City was looking at expanding to a greater channel capactty--400 megahertz, any thoughts of a high net, or increase to 54 channels--they were probably looking at a 10-15 year franchise in order to get a bonafide pr��pcsal from Storer. Mr. Kaspszak stated that from what he has read in the paper and from what he ha,s been hearing of technology. he thought there were one or two ways to qo: 1. He thought Storer would go for another 5-year renewal, status quo, pushing for no dramatic reformations on the City's part, nor are they goinq to proposal any dramatic changes; or, 2. Storer could opt for a 10-15 year franchise nnd depart from what they now have and move ahead to new frontiers and open up the whole process for bids. Mr„ Weaver stated right now he felt the pivotal item was an institutional nel:work for the City of Fridley, but that would cause them to reda the whole system. There was not adequate channel capacity on the existing system to cai�ry any insititutional network. Mr„ Kaspszak stated that if the Commission feels this ts important enough to thE�m, then this should be a major consideration in terms of the approach they take with the re-franchising. Mr„ Weaver stated he would like to see the system expanded for an institutional net:work, and he would like to see the schools as one of the users of that in�,titutional network. Other users of the institutional network could be go�rernment, comnercial/industrial corporations. Mr,. Moravetz stated other users of an institutional �etwork could be emer- ger�cy override, for security (municipal alarms), and inter-city system cor�necti ons. Ms. Hughes stated she would like to see an interconnect system with neighbor- inc� areas. She could see some reasons for an institutional network. Ms. Hughes stated that in terms of re-franchising, the Comnissioners had to stuidy the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984. It was an important tool in the re-franchising. She was convinced fror� reading the Policy Act that this re-franchising would be a whole new situation from the last time. Mr. Stouffer stated one thing he would like to find out was whether the City Cou�ncil wanted them to go for a renewal beyond ffve years. Ms. Hughes stated that she thought the Policy Act was going to take care of tha.t, no matter what the City Council wants. The Policy Act put the company in a much stronger position to get a"reasonable length of franchise", and fiv�e years was not ever going to be defined as reasonable. L�i_� CIITV COhlrIISSION MEETING. MARCH 19L 1985 PAGE 3 Mr•. Moravetz stated that maybe by the end of 1985, the Ctty tould solicit fr•om Storer different options or different alternatives tfiat Storer would be w111ing to consider during the re-franchising--a type of RFP (request for prbposal). They did this las t time. Ms,. Hughes stated one of the things she had hoped they would do in this rer-franchising discussion was not necessarily identify what they want riqht na�w, because she was not sure they could do that until they studied the Cable Ca�munications Policy Act of 1984, but also to look at what the process had be�en last time and what.issues there,were at that time that they might want to carry over to this re-franchising. Ms. Hughes stated she had made note of some at the last re-franchising, and most of the the City. She listed the following issues: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. b. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. of the issues in the negotiations issues were ones brought up by definition and two-way systems repair service, staff-response time (City's request) support of access, alot of discussion on cash contribution to access channels (City's request) number of channels and length of franchise (City's request) upgrading the system (both Company and City) audit certificatian and right of inspection of books (City's requirement) number of local programning (City's request) variance with no public hearing (both City and Con�pany agreeable} access leased channel capacity (Com any's request) subscriber contract (City's request� subscriber responsibility for damaqe and repair (Company's request) liquidated damages (City's request) reports to City on certain timetables, etc. (primarily City's request) including MCCV rules (prir�arily Company's request) �'Is. Hughes stated that in th�� City's end because of to respond to subscribers. looking at these issues, most of them came from either the City's dissatisfaction. the Citv wanting or wanting to protect the City's interests. Ms„ Hughes stated the process used was what Mr. Moravetz had stated earlier-- the City asked the Company what they would do for the City, the Company responded, and the City did what amounted to an RFP which gave essentially mi��imal requirements. The Company responded with a document saying what they we�•e going to do. The City was dissatisfied with seme thinqs and asked for some additions, and the Company sent back responses and comnents. Out of that th�� City and Company eventually put together the franchise, contract, etc. In ter�ms of how all that affected what they do now, she was not sure that process hacf worked and she was also not sure what affect the City's contract with the con�pany had in re]ationship to the new rules. Mr. Kaspszak stated he tbought they were now at tbe point where they should en51age the help of their attorneys, Herbst b Thue. 4G CATY COMMISSION MEETI��G. MARCH 19. 1985 PAGE 4 M�r. Weaver stated he felt an RFP was the best approach to take. He was not s�� sure they needed to get the attorneys involved at this Lime. The Gxnmissioners must also keep in mind that Storer is actively trying to ae sold. M:s. Hughes stated that if they think the coranunity ought to have the benefit o�F an institutional network, then they ought to be asking the people who would bi�y into that kind of thing--corporations, governmental units, schools, etc.-- wlhat their short range plans or long range plans would be. Ms. Nughes stated that in terms of what they should be doing for the re- franchising, the Commissioners should read through the Cable Conmunications P�licy Act of 1984 before the next meeting and be prenared at the next meeting t�� lay out a schedule in terms of the requirements in the Policy Act in terms o�f a timeframe when they must re-franchise, and then try to determine if there are some special things they should do. They really should put toqether s��me type of preliminary plan at the next meeting in terms of whether they want to have a survey done similar to what wRS done last time� how many public meetings, how early, how many, where. Then, after that, they can set up a meeting with the City Council and discuss these things with the Council. Discussion continued until the next meeting. 2. ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON FOR 1985-86: Chairperson Hughes declared the nominations open for chairperson. Mr. Kaspszak nominated Duane Peterson for chairperson. lNOTION 8Y PIR. iVEAVER, SECCbVDED BY XR. STIDUFFER, TO CLOSE TXE NOMINATIDNS F'OR CHAIRPERSQN. CPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON AUGHES DECLARED THE NOMINATIONS CIASED FOR CHAIRPERSON. Chairperson Hughes declared Duane Peterson the new chairperson of the CATV C:omnission for 1985-86. C�hairperson Hughes declared the nominations open for vice-chairnerson. I�r. Kaspszak nominated Ralph Stouffer for vice-chairperson. 11fOTION BY XR. idEAVER, SECOINDED BY XR. KASPSZAK, TD CLOSE TXE lUAMINRTIDNS ibR VICE—CHAIRPERSOsN. t/PON Jil VOICE VOTE, a1LL VOTING 1lYE, Cf/AIRPERSQN Hi1GHES DECLARED TXE 1i10PII1YATIONS CLOSED FOR VICE—CHAIRPERSON. Chairperson Hughes declared Raiph Stouffer the new vice-chairperson of 1:he CATV Comni ssi on for 1985-86. . � CATV COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 19 L 1985 PAGE 5 3. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Meeting Time Mr. Stouffer stated he would like to see the meeting time cfianged from 7:30 p.m, to 7:00 p.m. !lOTION BY XR. PETERSQiV, SECOIVDED BY 11R. STOUFFER, TO CNANGE THE KEETING TIINE fRON 7:30 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. UPQN 11 VDICE VOTE, 1lLL VOTIN6 AYE, CHAIRPERSON HUGHES DECLARED THE NOTION CARRIED UNANINOiJSLY. AOJOU Rt�+1E NT: Chairperson Hughes declared the March 19. 1985, CATV Conmission's Informal meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Re�ctfully submitted. Lynr a a Recor�ding Secretary 5 MEMO T0: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT MINTON, CIi�IRPERSON, FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION SUBJECT: CHANGES IN THE ALLOCATION OF FIDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $LOCK GRANT FUNDS DATE: APRIL 10, 1985 In order to comply with regulations issued by the Deparment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the Fridley Human Resources Commission is recommending a number of alterations in the allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. 1983 CDBG Funds - Funding Period: July 1, 1983 to December 31, 1984 (Extended by the Anoka County Board to Aug. 21, 1985) On May 7, 1984 the Fridley City Council approved the allocation of $4,150 to the Fridley Senior Citizen Center for a transportation program. The program failed to materialize,and the money was returned to the City. Now the Fridley Senior Citizen Center is asking that the same amount be allocated for the equipment listed in the attached memo. Recommendation: The Fridley Himman Resources Commission at its meeting of April 4, 1985 recommends that the Fridley City Council suthorize the expenditure of $4,150 from 1983 CDBG funds to the Fridley Senior Citizen Center for equipment. 1984 CDBG Funds - Funding Period: July 1, 1984 to December 31, 1985 On February 4, 1985 the Fridley City Council approved the allocation of $3,200 to Alexandra House, Inc. for the purpose of blacktopping their parking lot. It turned out that this was not an allowable use of CDBG funds for human services organizations under HUD rules. Accordingly, Alexandra House, Inc. has submitted a letter requesting that the same amount be allocated for insulation and paint - a permitted use under HUD regulations. Also at the February 4, 1985 meeting the Fridley City Council approved the allocation of $6,129 to Anoka County Co�unity Action Program, Inc. to fund its Senior Outreach Program. ACCAP requested the funds for a nine mon�h period running from September 1, 1985 to May 31, 1986. Since 1984 CDBG funds must be expended by December 31, 1985, ACCAP has reduced its requests to 4/9 of the original amount or $2,720. As can be seen from the attached chart, this leaves $3,409 unallocated. The Human Resources Commission felt that those funds could be reassigned to grant the request of Family Life Mental Health Center for $2,000 and to raise the allocation to the North Suburban Family Service Center to the $4,000 amount they orfginally requested. 5A MEMO T0: THE HONORABLE MAYOR �TD CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 10, 1985 Recommendation: The Fridley Human Resources Commission at its meeting of April 4, 1985 recommends that the Fridley City . Council authorize the expenditure of $16,920 of 1984 CDBG funds as follows: ' $2,000 to the Family Life Mental Health Center $4,000 to the North Suburban Family Service Center $5,000 to the Central Center for Family Resources $3,200 to Alexandra House, Inc. for insulation and paint $2,720 to Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. The unallocated $369 would revert to Anoka County for distribution. FRIDI.�Y SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER Frsdley Co�n�»u�rit�yEducatio�n Center 6085- 7t�� St�rreet NE * Fridley �5432 Humian Resources Coanission of Fridley �y�� ' ' B o� �'., . P'�°� C:NT!* 571-6000 EXT. 222 Th�e Fridley Senior Orop-in-Center is reapplying for the Comnunity De�velopment block grant monies that the Senior Center was not able tc� spend during the grant period ending 1984. The transportation pr•ogram for which the money was intended did not work out. Tfiis application is for expenditure of funds under category supplies. These items listed are with the approval �of the County oi`fice handling the CDBG funds. , Su lies: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. All weather matting Pool table (used) Band shell (free standing) Room dividers (free standing) a) 2- 8' peg board and casters ($70. divider + casters @ $7.) b) 8- 6' plain board � casters ($53. divider + casters @ $7.) Round folding tables (10 x 273.50) First Aid kit Literature rack (free standing) Printing supplies Total $ 298.00 298.00 150.00 154.00 480.00 2,375.00 50.00 �295.00 50.00 $4,150.00 Respectfully yours, % � 0'►�v�-°i�/�-C- � Tony Lorbeski Senior Center Manager iyQ �5c � /0! ALEHAf1DRA r � HOUIE, If1C. A SHEL'fER FOR BATTERED WOMEN AND TMEIR CHILDREN March 18, 1985 Mr. W'.Llliam C. Hunt Assist:ant to the City City of Fridley 6�31 University Avenue Fridle�y, MN 55�32 Dear I��:r . Hunt : Manager N.E. As per our conversation, I am revising the Alexandra House reque:>t for Com�unity Development Block Grant funds from the City c�f Fridley. We would like to use the $3,200 allocation for irisulation and paint. When E�lexandra House purchased its own facility in 1983, we had to prj.oritize our rehabilitation needs given limited funds. One of' the items that did not get done was blacktopping the back iialf of the driveway. Another was insulating the exterior walls and foundation. Two wi.nters later, insulation has become a pressing need. In the summer�, many of the south.rooms become uncomfortably warm even �,rith air conditioning. In the winter, at sub-zero temper- atures;, one bedroom and the meeting room become unuseable. Obviously our energy costs are also affected by lack of insul- ation. A prir.�ary goal at Alexandra House is to provide a safe, comfort- able e�nvironment for battered women and their children. Physical qualities like temperature play an important role in dealing with people in crisis. Insulation will help to create a climate whe^e the residents can focus on their emotional needs in leaving a violent relationship. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further inforniation. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincer�ely, '1 � � �� r��n;c�� P:olly �G'reenman Direct�'r N:�:si P.O. BOX 194, CIRCIE PINES, MN 55014 (LoCated in Blaine) Business: 78a2332 � TTY: 646�177 • Crisis: 780-2330 ly��- D ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC. 8008 N.E. HIGHWAY 65 • SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 • PHONE 784-2443 Marc:h 18, 1985 Mr. William Hunt, Staff Person Frictley Human Resource Commission 6437. University Ave. NE Friclley, MN 55432 Dear. Mr. Hunt: As �re discussed at our meeting of March 15, 1985, it is necessary to modify the funding period for the Senior Outreach Program to comx>ly with recent directives from Anoka County. I preceive this as sin administrative change to comply with accounting periods, not as a substantive change in the program. RegL►lations dictate that the 1984 CDBG program funds need to be expe�nded by December 31, 1985. As such the project which was rece�ntly funded in the amount of $6129 needs to be scaled back to only cover the period from 9-1-85 to 12-31-85. The correct budqet amount for this iour (4) month period should be $2720. I he�ve discussed this proposed change with Anoka County staff and they support this action. ACC��P intends to apply for FY 1985 funding to cover the portion of i:ime previously covered in the orginal grant. Please send us writ:ten evidence of City action on this request. Thank you for your time and interest in this regard. Sinc:erely, � ��l`",_ � ' / Ste��hen M. Klein Direactor of , Planning and Community Programs SMK,�mo AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AGENCY Fridley H�an Resources Commission 1984 C.D.B.G. Social Services Funding Requests REQUEST GRANT RECOM- AMT WITH POSSIBLE MENDATION REVISED ACCAP DISTRIBUTION 1/3/85 REQUEST Family L:Lfe Mental Health I�enter $ �,000 North Suburban Fam. Service Center $ 4,000 Central ��enter for Family ]tesources $ 5,000 S.O.R.T. Pick Up $ 2,000 Alexandr�3 House $ 3,200 Anoka County Vol- unteer �Alliance $ 1,500 Anoka County Com- munity �Action Program, Inc. $ 6,129 TOTALS $ 23,829 UNALIA CATED FUNDS Cr: $ 2,960 $ 5,000 0 $ 3,200 0 $ 6,129 $ 17,289 0 0 $ 2,960 $ 5,000 0 $ 3,200 U $ 2,720 $ 13,880 $ 3,409 $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ 5,000 0 $ 3,200 ❑� $ 2i7 20 $ 16,920 $ 369 �E I �•J MEMO T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: SIDNEY C. INMAN, DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL SERVICES/CITY CLERK SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS SPLITTING AND COMBINING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ' FOR THE APRIL 15, 1985 AGENDA DATE: APRIL 9, 1985 The properties concerned in the attached five resolutions have been previously dealt with by the City Council. We are presenting these resolutions to the Council to comply with the legal requirements regarding the splitting and combining of the special assessments on these properties. These divisions and combinations have been recorded at Anoka County. 1. Division of special assessments on Parcels 1000, 1340, 1400, 1530, 2500, and 2460, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, and re- platting into Creekridge Addition. 2. Division of special assessments on Lot 7, Block 4, University Industrial Park Plat. 3. Division and combination of special assessments on part of Lot 2, and all of Lots 3-5, Block 1, Paco Industrial Park Plat. 4. Division of special assessments on Parcel 150, Section 22, and Parcel 2080, Lot 9 and part of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 78. 5. Combination of special assessments on Lot 1, Block 1, Midwest Addition, and Lots 1-3, Block 11, and Outlots U, V, KK, LL, MM, and NN, Great Northern Industrial Center. Maps showing these divisions and combinations are attached. SCI ps Atts. RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCELS 1000, 1340, 1400, 1530, 2500, AND 2460, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 10, AND REPLATTING INTO CREEKRIDGE ADDITION WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: Parcels 1000, 1340, 1400, 1530, 2500, and 2460, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10, may and shall be apportioned and divided and replatted, as follows: Original Parcels Part of Lot 2, Parcel 1000, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 Part of Lot 3, Parcel 1340, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 Part of Lot 4, Parcel 1400, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 Part of Lot 5, Parcel 1530, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 Part of Lot 21, Parcel 2500, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 (Tax Forfeit Property) Parcel 2460, Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 (Street easement) Division and Replatting Approved Lot 1, Blk. l, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0058) Lot 2, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n �13 30 24 13 0059) Fund Regui ar SA ST. 1984-1 (St.&SS) ST. 1984-1 (Ponding) SW #145 Regular SA SW #26 ST. 1967-1 Regular SA Regular SA ST. 1961-3 No Assessments No Assessments Fund Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Pondingi Original Amount Paid $ 100,504.14 3,333.55 87,789.09 Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid 91,626.78 Original Amount Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 ' Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 . � Page 2, RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 Lot 2-A, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0060) Lot 3, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0061i Lot 4, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n I13 30 24 13 0062) Lot 5, 81k. 1, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0063) Lot 5-A, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0064► Lot 6, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0065) Lot 6-A, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0066) Lot 7, Blk. 1, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0067) Lot 1, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0068) No Assessments Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) $ $ Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Regular SA Paid ST. 1961-3 Paid SW #26 Paid ST. 1967-1 Paid ST. 1984-1 (St.&SS) $ 3,465.66 ST. 1984-1 (Ponding) 114.95 SW #145 3,027.21 No Assessments No Assessments Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) $ (Ponding) Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Regular SA Paid ST. 1961-3 Paid SW #26 Paid ST. 1967-1 Paid ST. 1984-1 (St.&SS) $ 3,465.66 ST. 1984-1 (Ponding) 114.95 SW #145 • 3,027.21 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) $ (Ponding) Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 . : Page 3, RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 Lot 2, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0069) Lot 3, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0070) Lot 4, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0071) Lot 5, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0072) Lot 5-A, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0073) Lot 6, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0075) Lot 6-A, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0075) Lot 7, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0076) Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) No Assessments Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 (St.&SS) ST. 1984-1 (Ponding) SW #145 No Assessments Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) S $ $ $ $ Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,021.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Pai d ' Paid Paid Paid � 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 6C Page 4, RESOLUTION N0. Lot 8, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0077) Lot 9, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0078) Lot 10, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0079) Lot 11, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0080) Lot 12, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0081) Lot 13, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0082) Lot 14, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0083) - 1985 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 5T. 1967-1 5T. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA 5T. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 (St.&SS) ST. 1984-1 (Ponding) SW #145 S $ $ $ $ $ Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 ' Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 . �, Page 5, RESOLUTION N0. Lot 15, Blk. 2, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0084) Lot 1, Blk. 3, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0085) Lot 2, Blk. 3, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0086) Lot 3, Blk. 3, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0087) Lot 4, Blk. 3, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0088) Lot 5, Blk. 3, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0089) Lot 6, Blk. 3, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0090) - 1985 Regular SA 5T. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW �26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 cst.ass) (Ponding) (St.�SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) (St.&SS) (Ponding) s $ $ � � Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Pai d Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Pai d 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3, 027. Z1 Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 Regular SA Paid ST. 1961-3 Paid SW #26 .Paid ST. 1967-1 Paid ST. 1984-1 (St.&SS) $ 3,465.66 ST. 1984-1 (Ponding) 114.95 SW #145 3,027.21 Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 ST. 1984-1 SW #145 (St.&SS) $ (Ponding) �Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 6E Page 6, RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 Lot 7, Blk. 3, Creekridge Add'n (13 30 24 13 0091) Regular SA ST. 1961-3 SW #26 ST. 1967-1 ST. 1984-1 (St.&SS) ST. 1984-1 (Ponding) SW #145 Lot 21, Auditor's Subdivision No Assessments No. 10 (Except part platted as Creekridge Addition) (Tax Forfeit Property) (13 30 24 13 0057) S Paid Paid Paid Paid 3,465.66 114.95 3,027.21 . - . . : ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY [�I� ATTEST: 1985. CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman MA OR Wi liam J. Nee . � sF (AJ rN . � � I �� . ., ` �� ' 4 °'',RIC� E �IM r� v !M ,.� � � . ,:�,�� :�q +.., � /C� ' •'� ��k r' : sii! � . . �� e :�� ' t�. µ • fi. � 4'� + //, � � �W� � �o�� *'�, � � _�— �� (y) �w. �. • ,�� s.� 6 .: ` � � w . � 3 2s �,,, cr•� �►� c�� . C.� , 0 a Y i� �I O t '� ry�� ,� • w� 2Z�n� . ��`'�S 2' / I .�`t . � ��ZO� �• ,a � K t .E. a�: , `� R�E , � � �s� ., � .� „� G i � � :, 0�.�� '��' �.�� ; �� ,�pR .. � � �� ; R � �EIJ � a --T— �.�-�-� -: • �=o � �;�� E�� p0 ;:,� �-.:o .� e , . ' � �3t ��tir�� (•� �C � =z^�v . f �' es`� r15 �� a �� I 2'(�J + Z i �l Wr�' I ' ,,�: z8 Q `' � 2� , �� ~� - t2S • - J � �I 10 f Q �� j � 2 .,.� ,a 2, 9 Q ~ Q � � (�J i �) i (r) - -?4 - �� .«� � � ♦ 3 aJoe1 l ) � W� w> .•� �,� :�: i5 � � ,d , � , _� �.� �, e s (iC � \" �:�►..w 'w% , /7N�) tr �+ r•`:s' � /i •1 ,,, _, �_, , i . .., � . . Creekridge P1at � ..r.,► '�'/ I � � Original Parcels �.L . .� 6G � S �B C �rr! _� ' 2 �A■i � u z�� .��3-.,.�- _� 1 ?00� 2� :-24-. �� RESOLUTI6N N0. - 1985 A RESOLUTION AUTHQRIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 7, BLOCK 4, UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the assessments levied against the following described parcel, to-wit: Lot 7, Block 4, University Industrial Park Plat, may and shall be apportioned and divided, as follows: Original Parcel Lot 7, Block 4, University Industrial Park Plat (12 30 24 32 0023) Division Approved South 30 Feet of Lot 7, University Industrial Plat (02 30 24 32 0030) Fund Regular SA W' No . 34 1964 Serv. Conn. ST. 1973-2 ST. 1973-1 SW&SS No. 102 SW No. 93 Reassmt. of SS #102 SS No. 114 ST. 1980 SW&SS No. 130 Fund Block 4, Regular SA Park . W No. 34 1964 Serv. Conn. ST. 1973-2 ST. 1973-1 SW&SS No. 102 SW No. 93 Reassmt. of SS #102 SS No. 114 ST. 1980 SW&SS No. 130 Lot 7 Except South 30 Feet, Block 4, University Industrial Park Plat (02 30 24 32 0031) Regular SA W No. 34 1964 Serv. Conn. ST. 1973-2 ST. 1973-1 SS No. 102 SW No. 93 Reassmt. of SS #102 SS No. 114 ST. 1980 SWbSS No. 130 Original Amount Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 1,570.47 118.54 1,898.06 1,441.69 8,946.54 9,705.29 23,680.59 Original Amount Paid Pai d Paid Paid Paid $ 219.87 16.60 265.73 201. 84 1,252.52 1, 358. 74 Paid Paid Paid Paid Paid $ 1,350.60 101.94 1,632.33 1,239.85 7,694.02 8,346.55 23,680.59 7 Page 2 RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 ADOPTEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY � 1985. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman 7A ..w � �t .� I� I� I� �I II �I 'I 6 � Division showing South 30 Feet of Lot 7, 61ock 4, and Balance of Lot 7, Block 4, University Industrial Park P1at � . .� .. �+; \�°- . . ,� ii '� II �� 1 Lot 7, Slock 4, University Industrial Park Plat . /: - :. -: � . . . �. �. � :�� -: �. �t�' / .. �; 7B � RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING AND COMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PART OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, AND ALL OF LOTS 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 1, PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: part of Lot 2, Block 1, and all of Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, Paco Industrial Park Plat, may and shall be appportioned and divided and combined, as follows: Original Parcels Part of Lot 2, Block 1, lying S. of N. 50 Ft. thereof, Paco Industrial Park Plat (11 30 24 32 0027) Lot 3, Block 1, Paco Industrial Park Plat (11 30 24 32 0003) Lot 4, Block 1, Paco Industrial Park Plat (11 30 24 32 0004) Lot 5, Block 1, Paco Industrial Park Plat (11 30 24 32 0005) Division and Combination Approved Lot 2 Except N. 50 Ft., Lot 3, and N. 35 Ft. of Lot 4, Blk. 1, Paco Industrial Park Plat (11 30 24 32 0032 Fund Regular SA W #34 S5 #24 SW #127 SS #127 ST. 1979-1 Regular SA W # 34 SS #24 SW #127 SS �127 ST. 1979-1 Regular SA W #34 SS #24 SW #127 SS #127 ST. 1979-1 Regular SA W #34 SS #24 SW #127 SS #127 ST. 1979-1 Fund Regular SA W #34 SS #24 SW #127 SS #127 ST. 1979-1 Original Amount Paid Paid Paid $ 6,600.72 2,283.28 4,284.90 Paid Paid Paid $ 8,372.82 3,214.36 5,713.20 Paid Paid Paid $ 8,175.92 3,176.92 5,554.50 Paid Paid Paid $ 8,175.92 3,150.61 5,554.50 64,257.65 Original Amount Paid Paid Paid $ �6,351.84 6,132.94 11,109.00 � Page 2, RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 Lot 4 Except N. 35 Ft., and Regular SA Lot 5, Block 1, Paco Industrial W#34 Park Plat SS #24 (11 30 24 32 0033) SW #127 SS #127 ST. 1979-1 Paid Paid Paid $ 14,973.54 5,692.23 9,998.10 64,257.65 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1985. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman i � • � _�� . A I i .� Division and Combination of Parcels Original Parcels : T31tD-��vE-*:f.� � _ �,-`_ w ' � z , - _- - - . � �• � � i l e i � .. c ► a i �,:�, ► A , ,•� � p�r�r � � /�•�r i , � �+ � ►+ � � � � � i . . ; � : � � �- -- � _.r. ---- �%'« � � i' s.; ,., �� 1__ � 0 RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 A RESOLUTION AUTHQRIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING QF SPECIA� ASSESSMENTS QN PARCEL 150, SECTION 22, AND PARCEL 2080, LOT 9 AND PAR7 OF LOT 10, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 78 WHEREAS, special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: Parcel 150, Section 22, and Parcel 2080, Lot 9 and Part of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 78, may and shall be apportioned and divided, as follows: Original Parcel �und Ori inal Amount Parcel 150, Section 22 ST. 1977-3 3,096.64 (22 30 24 11 0001) SW No. �26 1,4b5.10 ST. 1979-2 1,923.46 Lot 9 and Part of Lot 10, Parcel 2080, Auditor's Subdivision No. 78 (22 30 24 �1 0009) Division A roved Part of Lot , Auditor's Subdivision No. 78, and N. l55 Ft. of part of NE4 of NE< of Section 22 (22 30 24 11 0013) Part of Lots 9 and 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 18 (22 30 24 11 0014) Part of NE4 of NE%, Section 22 (22 30 24 11 0015) W No. 34 Regular SA SW No. 48-C ST. 1977-3 ST. 1977-3 (SS) SW No. 126 ST. 1979-2 Fund W No. 34 Regular SA SW No. 48-C SW No. 126 ST. 1979-2 W No. 34 Regular SA SW No. 48-C ST. 1977-3 ST. 1977-3 (SS) ST. 1977-3 (SS) Paid Paid Paid $ 4, 530. 75 3,786.67 2,592.10 22,556.94 39,9 . 6 — Original Amount Paid Paid Paid $ 4,057.20 24,480.40 Paid Paid Paid $ 4,530.75 3,786.67 $ 3,096.64 39,95].66 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY 0� , 1985. MAYOR Wi iam J. Nee ATTEST: CTTY CLERK Sidney C. Inman � ' . »»� : �; , . i i . • i 1 . • '` '' i I • w• 1 � ` O •� 1 1 • � � �j"k. �. �.�.�rd �.�r u�.xr ,wC �.r 12 .; ; OBERT LOUIS STEVENSON ; 9 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL � �' ' . . � , , .. � � , ,� ` ' i.,,�• .� Z � J/. . �- ♦�JN �,� 1 1 1 N �i�-� , ', � � � _� � � I , � O a 3 �_. ..•irf-. I i y�+ � 1 ; D ROBYN S� RiYER ' ; ��...i �'°� � '� ��. t � { i• � � � �� ui:�� t • � � � � • ;STREET � � �_ ` � � � ' � ,,. , , ,, � � �.. .., , , ] a =MAN01� ` � / :�1 ` !c 6' � � �� • {�1' a� i � l �..•t_ — — � � . . ..,,. . .. . 3 '_ , i ,, ` � � j • z - , ,��e �,; ` , ,., 4 � ; EAS R ER : � �; .v „ 1 l.w_ , : i ( • , • .>>f •� 'I � � � Cj � _ � . � .;,, .� N ; ;: 59: WAY ` N.E: -�. . ; ,i ^ I; � :i � � _ � , z' , :-�' �, � �/ s 3 �TA s �� ' i •� r .. �,� � r��' '. 1 ..� : + � n // p . . �`; . ; -r-- � � �!� I ' ' j �. . t I 1 , � O � � . �X /�.. . ( 1 � ilf10�'l� �fJ�� (/IYllIGt �.j %T ' � •1 � • ' � 9 OBERT LOUIS STEVENSON , � ELEMENTARY SCHOOL � �� ; , . , � ` � ,, I S �d � �. �.0 w � � � � �. � f s� � ----- I � � a ��1 � 4� -� j . _..,,,,_. � ; � � � ROBYN S � RiYER � � I ' � ^ � "~ . . � , ��:) � 4� ��' l�/ N �• � X� � • � 1 ,,,.: ; STREET � • ;? ' � � ��' � . � ' �� 1 n.� � � J a �:AI,4NO�T • � �l . (�_�` :'� •,,'. I -1: =��` � � ` , — � � a��" � � � = ' ` 'd �^ � ?lA��B � � M ., �� , � `O r v ,ti �.�.. E.4S lz R ER �' ;� : ' :` ; � � �',+.f• ��'�f� � l •y� �t .S9 wA N.E'•.►.�r . � � ! . 'z ' �_ , f,� �! '; a T,q S �" r �- � r. �. �2..._ . �:'., r � { ..d , � � , ,: :� - iti �� v ' ; f � V �' ' 4 � � ��H � I I ; / „ �1n � ; i � ♦� �_ � � ' , , � � �; � .F 'D t i ` :� �r . A `'' -` , a ` .j � Z . � , ^ Ic I � �_ � �,. � �j ., . �;: I � �� 4 J _ � 1 ��11 j :,� � / , � " � i .: i � ; � •� �� t . . e � : ; A � � �� a � O � < � s 1 4 � t � '.!= ! r 9A Original Parcels Division of Parcels Creating Three Lots RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MIDWEST ADDITION, AND LOTS 1-3, BLOCK 11, AND OUTLOTS U, V, KK, LL, MM, AND NN, GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the assessments levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: Lot 1, Block l, Mi��west Addition, and Lots 1-3, Block 11, and Outlots U, V, KK, LL, MM, and NN, Great Northern Industrial Center, may and shall be appor- tioned and combine�i, as follows: �Ori �inal Parcel Lot l, 6 oT ck�, Mi�iwest Addition (27 30 24 12 0045) Lot 1, Block 11, Great Northern Industrial Center (27 30 24 12 0016) Lot 2, Block 11, Gr•eat Northern Industrial Center (27 30 24 12 0017) Lot 3, Block 11, Gr•eat Northern Industrial Center• (27 30 24 12 0018) Outlot U, Great Nor�thern Industrial Center� (27 30 24 12 0022) Outlot V, Great Nor�thern Industrial Center� (27 30 24 12 0023) Outlot KK, Great Northern Industrial Center (27 30 24 12 0038) Outlot LL, Great Northern Industrial Center (27 30 24 12 0039) Outlot N�1, Great Northern Industrial Center (27 30 24 12 0040) Fund No Assessments SW&SS No. 131 SW&SS No. 131 SWbSS No. 131 ST. 1980-3 SW&SS No. 131 ST. 1980-3 No Assessments No Assessments SW&SS No. 131 ST. 1980-3 No Assessments Outlot NN, Great Northern No Assessments Industrial Center (27 30 24 12 0041► Original Amount $ 3,729.60 $ 3,623.04 $ 11,680.43 20,976.00 $ 1,157.64 3,461.04 $ 666.52 1,992.72 $-47,286.99 10 Page 2--RESOLUTION N0. - 1985 Combination ApprovE�d Lot 1, Block 1, Miciwest Center, and Lots 1-3, Block 11, and Out 1 ots U, V, KK, LI_, t�i, and NN, Great Northern Ir�dustrial Center (27 30 24 12 0045) Fund SW&SS No. 131 ST. 1980-3 ADOPTED BY THE CIT`f COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS OF , 1985. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman Ori inal Amount 20,857.23 26,429.76 47,286.99 DAY MAYOR Wil iam J. Nee 10A N I�1 COYiMFA src. r� �, . 53R' p � . ... : • . .i ,. �. " ':' GREAT '' "'� o � �� N :� o ' � "� �,, � 6 J .• I�1 • I . _ .Cp � `7' ! t * OYTIOT �A i �•• �` �{� �OYTLAT �1 . . t �r , � ^ w _ � �` , , �.. :: ..... �`� ; . .;� � l � cc 1. r „•:;- 521 .... ::.. K I�It 'I ' • r..! a�. F ND TR/ L s:�� =.�r-�: �.. ' 04TlOT Z L O ��) � � :: w.i •- • F I :I) i p � ��. . � . J � ► D • t O S � •r• � t ;� T" , f � ....=:=� __._. « . . .. .. �o� r .� :, . . , Q � �� : . .� � r- � ` 5 . �`s , K � � _ o ,r; �wn.oT v :�.. .._ <i . S��•• . : w.r .��w � � •.w ..� ��. vJT� �., � 5( ST WAY � : . �r •� .. . .... .. '�'�'L�'.�T K % aT�or , �: Property after "'-�-� combination �10t �-. M , lND�� r�or r �� ».,. — �• �� .._ � : , ..� U LOT p� { ,,,,... ... � 0 THERN ' 9 ' r � l / �1 OIR�OT QtM' /D M� ' 'ri Fs � r�ii,.. .`S� ...:.` a� ... T �'s{ � .., OYT�OT�11p�+ � p�iJ . � /L` � � xt j = � 1 f+ � �r %� .� , w N �: O . � � u�� O TLOT R�K i CEN R , �' 1/ � Q �� e ::.» ^T v R , f ^ _J2_, OUT�OT �NM '��^ N I� CANYEA 1dB � Property before combination .._.._ -�- _ ----- _ ..: � I F � � I Mf _ .�� IIM • ' , �a, tr � i � �; •_„ ,..,. vv��vr ww RESOI.IITION H0. - 1985 A RESOLIITIOR ORDBRI�G I!lPBOOBMBAT, APPBOYAL OF PLANS •ND ORDERIIiG ADYERTI3EMEPT FOR BID3: 3iRBBT INPaOYBMBNT PBOJBCT ST. 1985 - 10 ( SEALCOATIIIG ) YHBRSAS� the City Council of the Citq of Fridleq has establiahed a policy of Sealcoating the City atreets on a regular baais, YHBREAS, the Public Works Director haa aubmitted a plan ahoWing Lhe streets in need of aealcoating NOY THEREFORE, BB IT RBSOLYBD� by the Citq Council of the City of Fridley� Anoka Countq, Ninnesota, as follows: 1. That the atreets recommended Por sealcoating bq the Public Works Department be sealcoated, and the xork involved in aaid improvement shall Dereafter be designated as: STREET INPa0YEM8IiT P80JBCT 1i0. S?. 1985-10 2. The plans and apecifications prepared by the Public Works Department for auch improvement and eaeh oP them� pursuant to the Council setion heretofore, are hereby approved and ahall be filed With the City Clerk. 3. The xork to be performed under STREET IMPROVEl�NT PROJECT ST. 1985-10 shall be performed under one contract. The Public iiorks Director ahall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official neWSpaper advertisement Por bids upon the making oP suc:h improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for tvo (2) weeks (at least 10 days), and shall specify the vork to be done and will atate that bids Will be opened at 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday, the 14th day of Nay, 1985 in the Council Chambers oP the Citp Aall, and that no bids Will be considered unless aealed and filed with the Public Works Department and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid Dond, or eertiPied check payable to the Cfty for Pive per cent (5i) of the amount of such bid. That the advertisement Por bids Por STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1985-10 sball be substantially atandard in form. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF _ , 1985. iiII,LIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY C. �1MAN - CITY CLERK - — -- 3/6/t/2 11 �_ , �� — C��—;M,. } � cm�r��c• �. ._' ' • ��,4; %+"j� '�i -- �' . °' i VOTMO �0100. ,��;� �;''..'� . `�� i �7qCR =� �I�Cf• "�� ':i�:::•::•: ` L:: � . , .. -� I _ _ '� �,� i E� 3E ) "�p/' -- " c- i _ _- -{--`-'— ��{`��_.��_':- - �� , � • '' i�� c i �t�� `� - .s=_ - ' � y� r _ � �� !�'`� !�.. _ �:� � 1 i ' � �-- � L ' 3 N ��_.... � � �.. __ : _� •...- _ r -: . �!�, . i1, , .� : �_ � l/"' '• ' = %' ; , ,�. :.� .,�.' " � /r' �.�--y�`' ,� i - �i�i i� t!* i: °;.r,�,,,�a,t...�, � � `�+F ,� = � . -,�►3 - _ _ '. _ ,_• _� �s; --`�� `'{ ,� -:"; ;� � �� "� � �_:-- � --'_'_-, � , � � �• a ;� -,� � -=t �' � _ ._ i ,1 _ � �- � �, �:. , ,,��, p � -t� -s? � -�, �'.�% ,.� _ � �� -• ' . ;, � _ , ! �'� '' - ,. � � � � ,._ I r // � �� ; w �+,►E ' � .Jl. :t �' i � _ - _ _.._ ��. � � - --- - � � prosi 3 I � 1 1 ' _ � . �.��'�% �� __ _ _ . _ __ _ _- .. � (� i _ � 1� " .1 5 -� r _��--,,,,, ,.�_ �_ _ _ •:r - ='.:l � _- �� ;.� � .�.;ti.�' : � " � � � t � �,%''-I� � f : - ''S r� t-' • J`�T,-.� - • ± - � ` �- ' : i ' � � . .. ^� �� —� �1�r- ( .��e� s �1. � � t¢1 �• ••� _ � � �L ��. • a �' � N I �_ � r"'t ; � i - J •� iY 1 _ � -t -R r �� / � A� � f ' � : � �_ t.''�•.� y �� • � , ��%� . �,� � � � �' . � � ^� t�_ � � -' i , !. � � - /�'" !�L � '.� �-�°"! •� �j .Y - � 1 :.1' � �- - � � �� il �„ i�„� � 1 � - - - - - -- ----� ��p � � — ' s �, _e_ Y _ Y y �c �� uC ��.� : _ �_ s. _.- -_ -'-` _ � ._ -�. ( ;�- �.�' "�► ��z.`� ---� . � "� � a � �� ', � � _` r ��`- ( l t � � ''�j� � !r ' iT ; � . `�''7. �_��} - _- � � -.:. � � ��, �=- i .�:� �� r � 1 - _ti .. � _ _ �'-/.� �� ::i_�' 1_'1 I/ 7 -_ -:ii_ i - ..� ,� 1i ' ''�. � � � �� %,_ � � � �' '�'�� - �t I I - -i r•••[ •��f �� ' -� ' j, � . 1 � �_ ��i r'— ' / � � __ � �' � y ' � � } � --- = T I I_.. .� ,� . 1'�kf �rl ' i �' � _�—� .r. -I ' � ' �I 6 H�� M / �� -\ _', 1 � � `�� .. �,, � ; I' � ��'� " _ '�`%"�`+ ��, }r-�i� _�,��-- �"��I� �- � �� __ T� -_ - y,�`= �'•r=-- - --- . ' � —� _ .� _ " v�� i�� '`�_��.' '�� J V / _-` ' , `�, �� .�i .�j .� t ,.... __"►i_ J�� 11.J= ��j , � ;� � � '' ?_!� il I , + _ € s. ��.�. ... i i ! �` ' �� - n� _= c -- �-;--- ' "=- = = V 1\� : "'',{{� ',' - ' � - �.=. . �::c'=� =-r E �• -� � �I - ' - ' � __ _ _ �_ t � � �11�.' , �`'� � Zr•' tr '• `F° � a . �• � ' . _ _SIi � __ � s.� : :-- �_� _ � _ ' g �'�'� � �= T I �-' ' ' --� -r = _ =t n =_ - � � . - ; _ ' �_ � � __. � _ � '�_� ' ' ? , I: j' � - _�_ -= �_ _" =,_ - �" = _- __ _ f= — �' �= - �:_.' _= �- —._..— �.` B �-`� I ('_ .� � _ _�. -= �� _� _ =: - -��. _s �_ � < • •:: �: �� - _ = =' � _ _ '_'"_-' �; ,,,,° . __ - - != - �... @ ...,�a:' ' __ -: - __ _��: _ ___- _ ='tis : �� __• �-• `- �` - - _ _ _€ �:s,s = c '��-` ...,�, � _':• - - _.:- = _: _ _ --• -- �� .._: - � -- � ��1'' f - --�- " ��......_ �-r e �r' ^ L :: 's ��' 'S �� .,� �. sr� r ct.� � ^ ` _ � �� I ::�{ �, il � :: � � '_. �': ^p '-`'-- e'-?' � �= � � �' _E! - === '_ = _ -__ "� __" -= �=:• ='- �_;("_�_�- �- __ s:• - __ � _ ' - �-� -_� ` y� - ��` F"oi e �s e ��;i� ,r--- a: ' E5: ° �.�s� •,��,• � - � _ �^:C�.� - BTREET MAP-CIT� OF - - �i;_� � , �_� FRIDLEY � =�=� __. �- -- � = � . r-- .=._ .Y_ -�,� -c- ._.. � _�'- �_ . .. � " • � 11A � �8a-10 STREET LOCATION MAP � � 8 FOR CONCURRENCE BY TNE CITY COUNCIL April 15, I985 c�air;s No. 2C40 - No. 2259 -- CLAIMS 2 �' FOR GONCURRENCE 6Y TME CtTY COUNCIL April 15, 1985 Type of License: B�r�. Approved By: AUCTIONEERS Fridley Methodist Church 666 M�ississippi St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 BILLIARDS American Legion Post 303 7365 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Denny's I 250 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Ronnie's Bar 240 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley,Mn. 55432 BOWLING ALLEY Same Punkin Vending Mark Pillen James D. Hennessey -- LICENSES James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Nill Public Safety Director James P.Nill Public Safety Director James P. Nill Public Safety Director Maple tanes Bowling Center Fridley Rec. & Serv. James P.Hill 6310 Hwy. #65 N.E. Center Public Safety Director Fridley, Mn. 55432 CIGARETTE American Legion Post 303 Punkin Vending 7365 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 B�ill Johnson Standard Serv. Willis D. Johnson 5311 University Ave.N.E Fridley, Mn. 55432 Burlington Northern 80 - 44th Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Chanticlear Pizza 5304 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 City of Frid iey 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Canteen Co. R.A. Kempe t�liernik Vending James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director FMC Corp. Canteen Co. James P. Hill 4800 Marshall St.N.E. Public Safety Director Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fees: Exempt $60.00 $60.00 $40.00 $360.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $84.00 3 , FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- LICENSES JApril 15, 1985 Pa4e 2 CIGARETTE CONT. Fridley Standard 7680 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 George is in Fridley 3720 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Godfather Pizza 7910 Un�iversity Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Plus 250 - 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Noneymead Products Co. 24 = 44th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Jet 7600 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Longview Fibre Co. 5851 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Machining Inc. 7773 Ranchers Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Maple Lanes 6310 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 P�einke's Grocery Hut 7$83 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Menard Cashway Lumber 5351 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Northtown Standard 7609 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Onan Corp. 1400 - 73rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 P pQ 620.Osborne Rd. N.E. Lloyd R. Ring Anthony G. Nicklow Same Canteen Co.of Mn. N.E. Vending Kayo Oil Co. NSI/Griswold Corp. Miernik Vending Au�omatic Sales Gordon Meinke Jimny Jingle Inc. Lloyd R. Ring Servomation Corp. James D. Shelton James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Nill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P, Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. EI i 11 Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hi11 Public Safety Director James P. Fl i 11 Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director $12.00 $24.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $24.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $84.00 $12.00 A `j FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE C1TY COUNCIL -- LICENSES CIGARETTE CONT. R A 0 Mfg. Meirnik Vending 200 Mississippi St.N.E. Fri�ley, Mn. 55432 Ronni�'s Bar James D. Hennessey 240 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, MN. 55432 Servomat�ion Corp. Same 7490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Shars Snack Bar Sharlene Clochie 5207 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Simer Pump Co. Miernik Vending 5960 Main St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Mkt. Inc. Same 6071 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Station Same 6290 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Skywood Inn Skywood Mall 5201 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Snyder's Drug Store Same 6582 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Strite Anderson Mfg. Co. Servomation Corp. 7585 Viron Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Stuart Anderson Cattlemen's Servomation Corp. 5696 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 SuperAmerica Same 7299 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Swings Spruette John Swingdorf 6485 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Publ ic Safety Director ' James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Publ ic Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $24.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 � � / FOR'CONCURRENCE BY THE CiTY COUNCIL -- LICENSES �ril 15, 1985 Page 4 CIGARETTE CONT. Target Stores 755 - 53rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Totino's Foods 7350 Commerce Ln. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Union 76 Self Serve 5696 Hackman Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 CLUB ON SALE American Legion 7355 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 ENTERTAINMENT American Legion Post 303 7365 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 George is in Fridley , 3720 E. River Rd. ` Fridley, Mn. 55432 Raffael's Super Club 8298 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT American Legion Post 303 7365 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Chanticlear Pizza 6304 Hwy. 65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Standard 7680 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 George is in Fridley 3720 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Godfather's Pizza 7910 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Dean A. Little Servomation Corp. L.E. Smith Same Same Anthony G. Nicklow Ralph S. Virgillo Same R.A. Kempe Lloyd R. Ring Anthony G. Nicklow Same James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Fiill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hi11 Public Safety Director 1 $36.00 $12.00 $12.00 $150.00 $85.00 $85.00 $85.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 �j FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOOD ESTABLISHP4ENT CONT. Jet 7600 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Maple,Lanes Bowling Center 6310 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Meinke's Grocery Hut 7883 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Miernik Vending 7258 Commerce Circle Fridley, Mn. 55432 Northtown Standard 7609 University Ave..N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Raffael's Supper Club Inc. 8298 Unviersity Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Ronnie's Bar 240 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Servomation Corp. 7490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Shars Snack Bar 5207 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Sinclair Mkt. Inc. 6071 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Station 6290 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Snyders Drug 6582 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 SuperAmerica 7299 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Kayo Oil Co. Fridley Rec.& Serv.Co. Gordon Meinke Same Lloyd R. Ring Ralph S. Virgillo James D. Hennessey Same Sharlene Clochie Same Same Same Same 13 -• LICENSES Page 5 $45.�0 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.OQ �; _ � fOR CONCURRENCE 8Y TNE CITY COUNCIL April 15, 1985 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT CONT. FP1C Corp. Canteen Corp. 4800 Marshall St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley A& W Wiles Enterprises 7429 E.River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Learning Tree Center Social Dynamics Inc. 5310 Monroe St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lynwood Nealth Car Center Sev. Enterprises 5700 E. River Rd. Fridley, ��n. 55432 Pappy`s Food Co. Keith Warner 7879 Beech St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pan 0 Gold Thrift Shop Lloyd Decker 7365 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 The Perlman-Rocque Co. Same 51 - 52nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pizza Flame A.R. Gill 317 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Pizza Hut Wm. C. Ferr�il 255 - 57th Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Valley View Christian Church Rev. Sond 1280 Regis Ln._N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Swings Spruette John Swingdorf 6485 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Target Stores Dean Little 755 - 53rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Union 76 Self Serve Union Oil of Calif. 5696 Hackman Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 -• IICENSES Paqe b $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 �45.00 Exempt $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 J� FOR CONCURRENCE 8Y TNE CITY COUNCIL -- IICENSES April 15, 1985 Page 7 FOOD VEHICLE Miernik Vending 7258 Co►r�nerce Circle Fridley, Mn. 55432 Servomation Corp. 7490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 GOLF Fridley Golf Oriving Range 8100 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 LIVESTOCK Theodore B. Theilmann 1540 Rice Creek Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 MOTEL Skywood Inn 5201 Central Ave.NE. Fridley, P1n. 55421 Sunliner Motel 6881 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 OFF SALE BEER Jet 7600 University Avec. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 P4einke's Grocery Hut 7883 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 SuperAmerica 7299 Hwy.#65 NE. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Swings Spruette 6485 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Union 76 Self Serve 5696 Hackmann Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Same Same Roger M. Jones Same Skywood Mall Eugene Kreuzdemper Kayo Oil Co. Gordon F. Meinke Same John Swingdorf James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Union Oil Co. of Calif. James P. Hill E,:� �� $145.00 $30.00 $34.00 $625.00 $195.00 $60.00 �60.00 E,.� �� $60.00 $60.00 ` FOR CONCURRENCE BY TNE CtTY COUNCIL -- LICENSES J April 15, 1985 PaQe 8 ON SALE BEER Pizza Flame 317 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pizza:Hut 255 - 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Ronnie's Bar 240 tlississippi St.N.E. Fridley,Mn�: 55432 ON SALE LIQUOR Fireside Rice Bowl 1160 Fireside Dr. Fridley,Mn. 55432 Fridley Rec. & Serv.Co. 6310 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 George is in Fridley 3720 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Ground Round 5277 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Pulaski's 6259 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Raffaele's Supper Club 8298 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sandee's 6490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Shorewood Inn 6161 Hwy. #65 ��.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Stuart Anderson's Cattle Co. 5696 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 T.R. McCoy's 7850 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Same Wm. Ferril James D. Hennessey Oliver Y. Tam Same Anthory G. Nicklow Howard Johnson Or's Ralph Virgillo Wm. F. Weiss Wm. Nicklow Saga Enterprises John Stacey James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director 13G $325.00 $325.00 $325.00 $7,000.00 $6,000.00 $9,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000. $3,000.00 i FOR CONCURRENCE 6Y THE CtTY COUNCIL �' April 15, 1985 ON SALE SUNDAY LIQUOR -- LICENSES Page 9 Fireside Rice Bowl Oliver Y. Tam James P. Hill 1160 Fireside Dr. N.E. Public Safety Director Fridley,Mn. 55432 Fridley Rec. & Serv. Co. Same "" "" 6310 Hwy. #65 �J.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 George is in Fridley Anthony G. PJicklow "" "" 3720 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Ground Round Howard Johnson "" "" 5277 Central Ave.��.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Pulaski's Or's Corp. "" "" 6259 Hwy. #65 NE. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Raffaele's Supper Club Ralph Virgillo "" "" 8298 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Shorewood Inn Wm. Nicklow "" "" 6161 Hwy. #.65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 _ Stuart Anderson Saga Enterprises "" "" 5696 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 T.R. McCoy's John Stacey "" "" 7850 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 American Legion Post 303 Lyle C. Horton "" "" 7365�Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 PRIUATE PUMP D.W. Harstad Const. Same R�ichard Larson 7101 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fire Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Menard Cashway Lumber Same Richard Larson 5351 Central Ave. N.E. Fire Inspector � � � � Fridley, Mn. 55421 RMS Co. Dennis Forcelle Richard Larson 7645 Baker St. N.E. Fire Inspector Fridley, P1n. 55432 � � ��.� nr: ��.�, 1 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 =l fOR CONCURRENCE BY TME CITIf COUNCIL -- LICENSES SOLICTIOR The Flower Shoppe Mary Lou Box 8484 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 The Flower Shoppe Ptary Lou Box 8484 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 RETAIL GASOLINE Bill Johnson Standard Serv. Willis D.Johnson 5311 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, t+1n. 55432 Fridley Standard Lloyd R. Ring 7680 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Jet Kayo Oil Co. 7600 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Mkt. Inc. Same 6071 University Ave.h.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Station Same 6290 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 SuperAmerica Same 7299 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Swings Spruette John Swingdorf 6485 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Insepctor Richard Larson Fire Inspector Union 76 Self Serve Union Oil Co. o� Calif. Richard Larson 5696 Hackman Ave.N.E. Fire Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 TAXICAB Blue & White Serv.Corp. Barry Mack 3021 Portland Ave. P4pls. Mn. Fridley Cab Service Frank Gabrekciek 5923 N.E. 3rd St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �8�� Tax�WyncI00 Henry C. Bierbrauer James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60 �00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $10.00 $50.00 $140.00 � ' FOR CONCURRENCE 8Y TME CITIf COUNCIL -- LICENSES Aaril 15, 1985 Paqe 11 TREE REMOVAL Gustafson Tree Service 935 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Tim's,Tree Service Inc. 5612 Corvallis Ave.No. Crystal, Mn. 55429 USEO MOTOR VEHICLES Frank's Used Cars 5923 - 3rd St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Salvage Center 51 - 37th Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Win Stephens Datsun 7810 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 VENDING MACHINE Bill Johnson Standard Service 5311 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Bob's Produce 7620 University Ave.N.E. Fridl'.ey,Mn. 55432 Burlington Northern 80 - 44th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Columbia lce Arena 7011 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Datsun North 7810 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Denny's I 250 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Tim Gustafson Tim Hagan Frank Gabrelcik James A. Dowds Roland D. Benjamin 4Jillis D. Johnson Jimmy Jingle Inc. Canteen Co. Miernik Vending Miernik Vending Same Mark Pillen Ralph Volkmann Ralph Volkman James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director $40.00 $40.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $25.00 $15.00 $430.00 $45.00 �105.00 $25.00 $15.00 _I FOR CONCURRENCE 8Y TME CITY COUNCIL � April 15, 1985 VENDING MACHINE CONT. Frank's Nursery Larry Sollie 7620 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 FMC C�rp. Canteen Co. 4800 Marshall St.P�.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Convalescent Home Miernik Vending 7590 Lyric Lane Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Golf Driving Range Roger M. Jones 8100 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Launderette Dale E. Pearson 8150 E. River Rd. Fridiey,Mn. 55432 Fridley State Bank M. Etlicher 6315 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Frito-Lay Inc. Same 7180 W. Commerce Circle Fridley, Mn. 55432 GTE Sylania lnc. N.E. Vending 5300 Industrail Fridley, Mn. 55432 , Holiday Plus Canteen Co. of Mn. 250 - 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Honeymead Products N.E. Vending Co. 24 - 44th Av.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Longview Fibre Co. NSI/Griswold Corp. 5851 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Machining Inc. Miernik Vending 7773 Ranchers Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Maple Lanes Bowling Automatic Sales 6310 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 -- LICENSES Paq�e 12 $25.00 $1330.00 $30.00 $25.00 $25.00 $30.00 $15.00 $30.00 $150.00 $30.00 $150.00 $105.00 $105.00 � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CtTY COUNCIL -- LICENSES �' April 15, 1985 Page 13 VENDING MACHINE CONT. Menard Cashway Lumber 5351 Central Ai�e.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Micro:Control Co. 7956 Main St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Plywood Mn. 5401 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Servomation Corp. 7490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432� Simer Pump Co. 5960 Main St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Mkt. Inc. 6071 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Station 6290 Nwy. #65N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Skywood Inn . 5201 Central Ave.P�.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Strite Anderson Mfg.Co. 7585 Viron Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Swings Spruette 6485 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Target Stores 755- 53rd Ave. N.E. Fridley, �4n. 55432 Totino's Foods 7350 Commerce Ln. NE. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Viking Chevrolet 7501 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �iking Eng ineering 740 Beech St.N.E. Jimny Jingle Inc. Eleanor Hamilton Major Vending Same Miernik Vending Same Same Skywood Mall Servomation Corp. John Swingdorf Dean Little Servomation Corp. Jimmy Jingle Same $60.00 $25.00 $25.00 $100.00 $75.00 $25.00 $25.00 $150.00 $200.00 $30.00 $75.00 $250.00 $60.00 $25.00 � � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY TNE CITY COUNCIL -- LICENSES 1 M APRIL 15, 1985 198a-85 Licenses �f NEAAI. CONTRACTOR filder Jones Inc. 1120 East 80th Street Bloomington, !�1 55420 Master Craft Builders �1050 liashburn Avenue South lSinneapolis� !�1 55410 David Pust Construction Co. 2945 - 129th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, t�t 55433 1985-86 Licenses BI..AC CTOPPING Asphalt DriveWay Company 1211 East Highriay �36 St . Paul , !�W 55109 C � S Blacktopping Inc. 8832 Kest BroadWay Hinneapolis, I�1 55��15 Modern Roadrrays Company 1620 Winnetka Avenue South Golden Valley, t�W 55427 Northern Asphalt Construction Inc. 11064 Raddison Road N.E. Minneapolis, !�W 55434 EXCAi1ATING Carl Bolander � Sons Co. 257 Starkey Street P.O. Box 70216 St. Paul, 1�SN 55107 Brighton Excavating Co. 1920 Highxay #96 NeW Brighton, !�V 55112 Groth SeWer � Hater 13820 Co. Rd. t5 Plymouth, l�IIJ 55441 IInited Yater � Sewer Co. 6020 Culligan Yay Minnetonka, l�II�l 553�5 � ,M : � • ;��•� Richard Hayman Richard Anderson David Pust • ,Y h1 � .� � Steve Hanon Patrick Stanton E. R. Smith Gerhard Larson Roger Erickson Geo. IndqkieWicz Larry Groth Jim Spetz ePP�vEn By Darrel Clark Chief Bldg. Ofe. Same Same �PPROVED BY Darrel Clark Chief Bldg. Ofc. Same Same Same Same Same Same Same = FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNClL -- IICENSES ��L is, isss �iAS SERVICES Air Comfort Inc. 3g44 Louisiana Circle iiilliam Sandin Hinneapolis� MJ 55426 Donal G. Ruden Plbg.-Htg. Insp. Aoerican Burner Service, Inc. 601 liorth Prior Avenue Same 3t. Paul, i�t 55104 Lyle D. Rotvold Backdahl � Olson Plumbing � Heating Co. 3157 Chicago Avenue South Ninneapolis, !�i 55�►Oi Richard Olson Same Bill's Sheet Netal 7g91 Spring Lake Road N.E. Same Spring Lake Park, t�At 55�32 ilil�iam Andreasen Blaine Heating, A/C � Electric, Inc. 13562 Central Avenue.N.E. Anoka, I�W 553�� Don Chouinard Same Care Air Conditioning � Heatiag Inc. 1211 Old Highway #8 �e Nex Brighton, !�1 55112 Aonald Dickison G. 0. Carlson Air Conditioning 1156 Aldrich Avenue North Same Minneapolis, i�i 55a11 John C. Jenkins Centraire Inc. 7402 Washington Avenue South Same Eden Prairie� !�W 55344 John Roepeke Dependable Heating � Air Conditioning, Inc. 2619 Coon Rapids Boulevard N.w. Same Coon Rapids, MN 55u33 Thomas L. Chouinard Frank's Heating b� Air Conditioning Inc. 3107 California Street N.E. Same Minneapolis, I+IId 55�18 David Vogt Gas Supply Ync. 2238 Edgewood Avenue South �e Hinneapolis, !�T 55426 S. R. Navickas Button and RoWe Ine. 2126 - �nd Avenue North Anoka, !�I 55303 Leslie J. Ro�e Lat�son-Nac Company Inc. 1509 Coon Rapids Boulevard Coon Rapids, I�1 55433 Robert Larson Same Same Ll 1 _ r FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- LI C E N S E S APRIL 15, 19B5 Minnegasco, Inc. 201 South 7th Street Minneapolis, !Q1 55402 portheast Sheet Netal, Inc. �3�7 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, !�T 55421 p � $ Servicea Co., Inc. 208 - 73� Avenue North Minneapolis, !�I 55�30 Riehmond � Sons Electrie Inc. Golden 9alley Heating d� Air Cond. 5182 West Broadvay Crystal, !�1 55429 Rouse Nechanical, Inc. 113�►8 K-Tel Drive • Minnetonka, !�1 55343 Royalton Heating � Cooling Co. q120 - 85th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MJ 55443 Standard Heating � Air Cond. Co. 410 West Lake Street Minneapolis, I�1 55408 Suburban Air Conditioning Co. 8419 Center Drive Minneapolis� !�T 55�32 Donal d L. Brorrn D. L. Anderson Gerald Steffens Sigurd Follese Gary Danzeisen Hilliam SteWart Ted Ferrara 1C. W. Chinander Superior Contractors Inc. 6121 - 42nd Avenue North Minneapolis� !�I 55�22 Donald Hoglund GENERAL CONTRACTOR Arkay Construction Co. 620 North County Road 18, Suite 189 Minneapolis, l�II�I 55427 Julius Riokin Brickner Builders, Inc. 6170 Aeather Place N.E. Fridley� l�i 55432 Thomas Brickner Brovold/Larson Builders Inc. 1161 - 79th Avenue N.E. Spring Lake Park, !QT 55432 Ronald Brovold August Cederstrand Co. � 966 Central Avenue N.E. . Minneapolis, !4d 55413 Doug Cederstrand Same Saae Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Darrel Clark Chief Bldg. Ofc. Same Same Same � � FOR CONCURRENCE 6Y TME CITY COUNCIL APRIL 15, 19B5 Chris Construction 240 Longfellov Street N.E. Fridley, l�Ild 55432 John Jarvi Dav-Ho Home Improvements 1325 - 42nd Avenue N.E. Colta�bia Aeights, l�Al 55�21 Al 1Copeckq Dundea Rursery and Landscape Co. 16800 8ighxay #55 Plymouth, !�1 55446 Gerald Theis Durabilt Associates, Inc. 73�►3 Ann Coort Eden Prairie, l�AT 553� ?homas Hasprzak Elder-Jones Inc. 1120 East 80th Street Bloomington, l4�1 554�0 Patricia Trapp Erickson Brothers 4567 ifest 80th Street Kinneapolis, l9�1 55437 C. Jimmie Carlson Darrel A. Farr Development Corp. 4600 Lake Road Robbinsdale, !�1 55422 Bruce Ellingson Gislason Masonry Inc. Rt. �1 Isanti, !Qi 55040 Darryl Gislason Larry Gudmunsen remodeling 2651 Rice Creek Road Ne�► Brighton, !�T 55112 Larry Gudmunsen Ha�aa Construetion, Inc. 2040 Douglas Drive North Ninneapolis, I�Ai 55422 James A. Hagman Diek Harris Company 6200 RivervieW Terrace N.E. Fridley, t+AT 55432 Richard Aarris 8arrison Development, Inc. 7920 Cedar Avenue South Bloomington, !gT 55420 William D. Harrison D. Y. Harstad Co., Inc. 7101 Aighway #65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55�32 Alton (Diek) Johnson Hogar Canstruction Inc. � 2098 Silver Lake Road Nesr Brighton, !�I 55112 'Jerry Guimont -- LICENSES Same 3ame Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same � = FOR CONCURRENCE eY THE CITY COUNCIL APRZL 15, 1985 Hilton Johnson Co. 2513 Central Avenue N.E. . Ninneapolis, I�l 55418 Nilton L. Johnson - trepa (Ray) Construction Co., Inc. ' 1676 Chatham Avenue �rden Hills, l�IId 55112 Raymond 1Creps Lloyd's Home Improvements, Inc. 1012 - �2 1/2 Avenue P.E. Columbia Heights, !Q1 55�21 Lloyd Graczyk Naster Craft Builders 4050 Hashburn Avenue SouLh Ninneapolis, !QI 55410 Richard Anderaon J. A. l�enkveld � Associates Inc. 1299 t'4ississippi Street N.E. Fridley, !41 55432 • Jack Nenkveld !�l�odern Insulation Inc. 10779 - 93rd Avenue Horth Oaseo, t4�1 55369 Donette Lamb Nedegaard Construction Co., Inc. 1814 Northdale Boulevard p.E. Coon Rapids, 1�4d 55�33 Gill Gruber Opus Corporation P.O. Box 150 Ninneapolis, t�4J 554u0 li. Lqle Meyer Patio Enclosures, Inc. 6219 Cambridge Street St. Louis Park� I�1 55416 Hark Swanson Pilgrim Remodeling 10091 Pilgrim iiay Osseo, lrII�l 55369 Lyle Pederson D. V. Sel Pe Construction Co., Inc. 1755 East Co. Rd. H2 i�ihite Bear Lake, l�I 55110 D. V. Selfe Yesiern Construction Co. 5353 WaYzata Boulevard Kinneapolis, NIIV 55416 l�Iilton Chazin � Air Comfort Inc. 3944 Louisiana Circle Minneapolis, l�IId 55426 Donal Ruden -- LICENSES Same Sa�e Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same William Sandin Plbg.-Htg. Insp. � � FOR CONCURRENCE 6Y TME CI?Y COUNCIL APRIL 15, 19B5 American Burner Service Inc. 601 Horth Prior Avenue St. Paul, .I�i 5510� Lyle D. Rotvold Bi21'a Sheet Netal ' 79gt Spring Lake Road H.E. Spring Lake Park, ?�W 55432 iiilliam Andreasen Blaine Heating, A/C � Electric, Inc. 13562 Central Avenue N.E. Anoka� I�I 5530� Aon Chouinard Care Air Conditioning b Heating, Inc. i211 Old HighWay �8 Nex Brighton, I�l 55112 Donald Dickison C. 0. Carlson Air Conditioning Co. 1156 Aldrich Avenue North Minneapolis, !Q1 55411 John C. Jenkins Centraire Inc. 7402 Hashington Avenue South Eden Prairie �!�W 5534u John Hoepeke Central Air Conditioning � Heating Co. 1971 Seneca Road Eagan, !�i 55122 Robert iiinston Jr. Dependable Heating � Air Cond. Inc. 2619 Coon Rapids Boulevard � Coon Rapids� !4t 55433 Thomas Chouinard Fquipment Supplq Inc. 593 North Fairview Avenue St. Paul, l�AI 55104 David Hodgson Frank's Heating � Air Cond. Inc. 3107 California Street N.E. Minneapolis, !�i 55418 David Vogt Furnace Care Inc. 8733 Humboldt Avenue parth Brooklyn Park, I�T 55444 �3orham-Oien !lechanical Inc. 115 iieat Naple tiora, l�+i 55051 Hutton a�nd RoWe Inc. 2126 - 2nd Avenue Aorth Anoka, !QT 55303 Richard Bidler Robert Iriitchell Lesl ie Roi+e J� d Heating � Sheet Metal Inc. RR#3, Boz 590 Cambridge, !Qi 55008 �Jerry Lindell -- LICENSES Same Sase Same Same Smae Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same � = FOR CONCURRENCE BY TNE CtT1f COUNCIL APRIL 15, 1985 J.T.S. Services, Inc. 88 Yest Woodlynn dvenue St. Paul� !�W 55117 Thomas Skotnieki Laraon-Mac Companq Inc. � 1509 Coon Rapids Boulevard ti.N. Coon Rapids, !�d 55433 Robert Larson !letropolitan Nechanical Contractors, Inc. 73a0 Nashington Avenue South Eden Prairie, IYII�I 553�� Thomas Nelson Noel's Heating d� Air Cond. Inc. 6900 - ?5th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, I�AJ 55428 Noel Olson Northeast Sheet Netal, Inc. �13k7 Central Avenue N. E. Minneapolis� !Ql 55421 D. L. Anderaon Oaens Serviees Corporation 930 East 80th Street Bloomington, M�T 55420 Robert Os+ens P� B Services Co.� Iac. 208 - 73rd Avenue North Minneapolis, l�Q�l 55430 Gerald Steffens Richmond � Sons Electric� Inc. Golden Valley Heating � Air Cond. 5182 West BroadWay Crystal, l�D�l 55�129 Sign Folleae Rouse Mechanical, Znc. 113�8 K-Tel Drive Minnetonka, !Q1 55343 Gary Danzeisen Royalton Heating d� Cooling Co. 4120 - 65th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, l�AT 55�b3 ilillia.m Stexart Snelling Compaay 1400 Concordia St. Paul, l�II�1 5510� Frederic grinkie Standard Heating � Air Cond. Co. 410 ilest Lake Street Ninneapolis, l�Qd 55�08 Ted Ferrara Suburban Air Conditioniag 8�19 Center Drive Minrseapolis, !Qt 55432 Steve Chinander 9 S -- LICENSES Same Saae Same Same Same Same Same Same Same ° Same Same Same Same � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCiL � APRIL 15, 19B5 Superior Contractors Inc. 6121 - 42nd Avenue North . Ninneapolis, Md 55422 Donald $oglund Fred Vogt � Company • 3260 Gorham Avenue South St. Louia Park� !QI 55426 Alan !lalley Ray H. iielter Heating Co. #637 Chicago AveAUe Ninneapolis� !�t 55407 Ray Yelter Ysle, Inc. 96u9 Girard Avenue Soutb Bloomington, !�1 55431 John Deblon �,SONRY Buzzell Hasonry, Inc. 1633 HighWay #10 N.E. l�Iinneapolis, l4�1 55432 Concrete Concepts, Inc. 16249 genia Street N.ii. Anoka, !�1 55304 DeMarais Construction Inc. 3952 - 10th Lane Anoka, !�W 55303 L. T. Ernst, Inc. 2055 - 105th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, !�i 55434 D.W. Harstad Co.� Inc. 7101 Highxay �65 N.E. Fridley, iR3 55432 3esco� Inc. T175 Cahill Rosd Edina� IrAI 55435 Masonry Concepts Co. 11601 iiest River Road Champl in, i�i 5 5316 Nikedonald Cement Co. 1140 Pierce Terrace N.E. Ninneapolis� !Qi 55�21 Nark t�bsman Masonry 7311 ilest Izaak lialton Road Bloomington, I�T 55u38 Carroll Buzzell Sr. Wayne Snudson Ron DeMarais Lloyd Ernst Alton (Dick) Johnson Roy Falness Roge r Rop Donald Siegel Hark Hosman -- LICENSES Same 3ane Same Same Darrel Clark � Chief Bldg. Ofc. Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same T u ., �76-1 tTATEMENT �AITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON ! HASKVIi2 ATTOR1iE V S AT LAW 1000 IDS Center i�i i 0 Y KOEIt6 EKFM ANa! �tN� MINNEAPOl.15, MINNESOTA 55�02 �79- I1� I rCity of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attention: Mr. Nasim Qureshi. L City Mana9er CJN CATE � w.��e ��tv.. n�u �w��e� ��r« ��u� ��rtw� • SUBURBAN OFFICE FRIDLEV 1 �] � sAi:.►rC� FORWAfiDEO FROM USi STATEMENr 4-08-85 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during January, 1985. Representation of Gity of Fridley in court in Anoka on 1-08-85, 1-09-85, 1-15-85. 1-22-85, 1-23-85 and 1-29-85 for 23T pre-trial conferences and ort 1-10-85, 1-24-85 and 1-31-85 for 47 court trials in Columbia Heights. 101.75 hours. Preparation of 45 misdemeanor criminal complaints and 7 gross misdemeanor criminal complaints and miscellaneous office and phone conferences with police and citizens. 26.25 hours. �OTAL TIME (128 hours) (January, 1985 Retainer) s1,650.00 51.650.00 Time in excess of Retainer (98 hours) 4,900.00 Sb,55G.00 FORWAROE� �ROM LAST 5T4TEMENT 4-08-85 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during February, 1985. Representation of City of Fridley in court tn Anoka o� 2-05-85, 2-12-85, 2-13-85, 2-19-85, 2-26-85 and 2-21-85 for 90 jury trials and on 2-14-85, 2-21-85 and 2-28-85 for 24 court trials in Columbia Heights, and 1 appellate case. 84.5 hours. Preparation of 49 misdemeanor criminal complaints and � gross misdemeanor criminal car.plaints and miscellaneous office �d phone conferences with police and citi2ens. 31.75 hours. TOTAL TIhff (116.25 hours) (February, 1985 Retainer) s1,650.00 �1,650.00 Time in excess of Retainer (86.25 hours) 4,312.50 s5,952.50 fORWAHDED FROM IAST STATEMENT 4-08-85 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during March, 1985. Representation of City of Fridley in Court in Anoka on 3-05-85, 3-13-85, 3-18-85, 3-19-85, 3-25-85, 3-26-85 and 3-27-85 for 169 pre-trial conferences a�d o� 5-14-85 and 3-28-85 for 19 court trials in Columbia Heights. 115 hours. Preparation of 8 misdemeanor formal car.plaints and 19 gross misdemeanor criminal car.plaints and miscellaneous office and phone conferences with police and citizens. 16 hours. TOTAL TIME (131 hours) (March, 1985 Retainer) j1,650.00 s1,650.00 7ime in excess of Retainer (101 hours) 5,050.00 s6,700.00 14A