06/15/1987 - 5059__ __
s. . . .
OFFICIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
COUNCIL I�EETING
JUNE 15, 1987
„i
.::�
;��
; ,i
.�
W
fRIOLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETIN6
PLEASE SIGN NAME AODRESS AND ITEM Nl1MBER IN7ERESTEO IN DATE: 6J15187
I�AME ADDRESS ITEM NUM6ER
. -
�
FRIDLEY CI TY COUNCIL
JUNE 15, 1987 - 7:30 P.M.
Fo1loWing are the "ACTIONS TAKEN" by the Administration for your
information.
------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Council Mee ting, June 1, 1 987
Approved
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Adopted With adding Consideration of Ordinance
to Provide for the Adjustment of Salaries for
the Mayor and Councilmembers
OPEN FORUM. V ISITORS :
Scott Lund spoke regarding the Fridley 49er Days
PUBLIC HEARINGS :
Consideration of a Final Plat, P.S. �87-0�, Ken's
1st Addition, Generally Located South of 77th
Avenue, West of Main Street and North of Osborne
Road, by Ken Bureau of Rosewood Properties, Ine. ....
Opened at 7:�13 p.m. Closed at 7:45 P•�•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Item is on July 6
agenda f or consideration of a resolution
. 1 - 1 F
Couneil Meeting, June 15, 1987
OLD BUS INESS :
Page 2
Consideration of Second Reading of an Ordinance
Recodifying Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code,
As It Rel ate s to Heal th Care Cl inie Parking,
Chureh Parking and Garage Setbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2 D
Ordinanee No. 888 adopted
CENTRAL SER1T ICES--ACTION TAKBN: Publ ished in Fridley Focus
Consideration of Appointments to Environmental
Qual ity and Energy Commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Tabled
CITY MANAGER--ACTION TAREN: Have put item on next agenda for
consideration
NEW BUS INESS :
Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinanee
Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending
Chapter 1� Entitled "Peddlers" Section 14.08,
Investigation and Issuance, and Adding New Section
1�F.11, Hours of Solicitations, and Renumbering
Present 14.11 Through 14.20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 B
Tabled to next meeting
POLICE DEPT.--ACTION TA�EN: Have put item on July 6 agenda
Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance
Approving a V acation, SAV #87-03, to V acate a 6
Foot Drainage and Utility Easement Created by
Yiet's Seeond Addition, Generally Located at
643o East River Road N.E., by Donna Olson ........ 5- 5 B
Approved
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Item is on July 6
agenda for consideration of second reading
Council Meeting, June 15, 1987
NEW BUSINESS ( Continued)
Page 3
Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Final
Plat, P.S. �87-03, Oliver Olson Addition, Being
a Replat of Lot 1, Bloek 1, Veit's Second
Addition, and Lot 26, Revised Auditor's Sub-
Division No. 23, the Same Being 6430 East River
Road N. E . , by Donna Ol son . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 C
Resolution 47-1987 adopted with stipulations
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Informed appropriate
party of Council approval with stipulations
Item from the Planning Commission Meeting oF May
20, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 R
A. Consideration of a Special IIse Permit, SP
�87-09, to Allow Offices Not Associated with the
Prineipal Use, Generally Located South of 77th
Avenue, West of Main Street and North of Osborne
Road, by Ken Bureau of Rosewood Properties, Ine.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval
With Stipulations
Council Action Needed: Consideration of
Recommendation
Approved with stipulations
COMMIINITY DEVELOPME NT--ACTION TAREN: Informed appropriate
party of Council approval with stipulations
NOTE TO STAFF: Prepare modifications to the zoning
code for the June 29 Conferenee meeting
Council Meeting, June 15, 1987
NEW BUSINESS ( Continued)
Page �
Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of June 3, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 U
A. Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP �87-
10, to Allow a Second Aceessory Building on Lot
1 5, B1 oek 3, Mel ody Manor 4 th Addi ti on, th e S ame
Being 7531 Lyrie Lane N.E., by Jerome and Janet
Meyer ...........................................
Planning Commission Recommendation: Denial
Council Action Needed: Consideration of
Reeommendation
Denied
COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Informed
appl icant of Couneil denial
B. Consideration of a Vacation, SAV �87-0�1, to
V aeate Easements on Lot �F, Bloek 2, East Ranch
Estates Second Addition, Generally Located at
7710 University Avenue N.E., by J. Benson and G.
Bradbury .........................................
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval
With Stipulations
Couneil Aetion Needed: Set Public Hearing
for duly 6, 1987
Set Public Hearing for 7/6/87
8- 8G
& 8P-8S
8L-8M
& 8T-8II
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Public Hearing is set
for July 6, 1987
Couneil Meeting, June 15, 1987
NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
PaSe 5
Item from the Planning Commission Meeting of May
6, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 I
A. Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #87-
05, to Allow Offices Not Associated with the
Principal Use; to Allow Exterior Storage of
Materials and Eq uipment on Lots 3, 4 and 5, Bloek
2, Caba Realty Addition, Generally Located South
Of 83rd Avenue and West of University Avenue, by
M-B Properties
Planningg Commission Recommendation: Approval
With Stipulations
Council Action Needed: Consideration of
Re comme ndation
Approved with stipulations
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Notified appropriate
party of Couneil approval with stipulations
Items from the Appeals Commission Meeting
of May 26, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 EE
A. Consideration of Varianee Requests, VAR �87-
17, to Deerease the Setbaek from a Street Right-
Of-Way Line, Abutting a Residential Distriet, to
Deerease the Setback From a Street Right-Of-Way
Line Abutting a Residential District, Caba Realty
First Addition, All Generally Located South of
83rd Avenue and We st of University Avenue N.E.,
by M-B Properties ................................ 10-10F
Appeals Commission Recommendation: Approval
With Stipul ation
Couneil Aetion Needed: Consideration of
Recommendation
Approved variance for 5 year period
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Notified appropriate
party of Couneil approval of varianee for 5 year period
Couneil Meeting, June 15, 1987
NEW BUSINESS ( Continued)
(Appeals Commission Meeting Continued)
B. Consideration of a Variance Request, VAR #87-
18, to Reduce the Required Side Yard Setback from
1 0 Fee t to 5 Fee t on Lot 2, B1 ock 2, Sylvan Hil l s
Addition, the Same Being 6251 Rainbow Drive N.E.,
by Richard and Jane Franta ..................... 10G-10Q
Appeals Commission Recommendation: Approval
With Stipulations
Couneil Action Needed: Consideration of
Recommendation
No action-petitioner withdrew plan
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TASEN: No action needed
C. Consideration of a Variance Request, VAR �87-
19, to Reduce the Rear Yard Setback from 25 Feet
to 1�F Feet on Lot 2, Bloek 1, Rice Creek Estates
Seeond Addition, the Same Being 1531 Woodside
Court N.E., by Jenny Riley ....................... 10R-10W
AApeals Commission Recommendation: Approval
With Stipulation
Council Action Needed: Consideration of
Recommendation
Approved
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TASEN: Notified appropriate
party of Couneil approval
Page
Council Mee ting, June 1 5, 1 987
NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
(Appeals Commission Meeting Continued)
D. Consideration of a Varianee Request, VAR #87-
20, to Inerease the Maximum Percentage of a Lot
Allowed to be Covered by the Main Building and all
Aecessory Buildings from 40$ to �6.5� on Lot 3,
Block 3, East Ranch Estates, the Same Being 7770
Ranchers Road N.E., by ELO Engineering-Belt Line
Construetion Co . .................................
Appeals Commission Recommendation: Approval
With Stipulations
Council Aetion Needed: Consideration of
Re commendation
10%-10EE
Approved
COMMIINITY DEQELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Notified appropriate
party of Couneil approval
Page 7
Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Revised
Contraet with Super Cycle for Curbside Recyeling
Collection Serviees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 B
Resolution 48-1987 adopted
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Proeeed as authorized
Consideration of a Resolution Approving I-69�F Layout
Identified as State Projeet 0285-�9 (69�=393), State
Project 2787-16 (694=393), Federal Projeet IR 69�+-5
(102) from T.H. 152 to T.H. 35W . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 B
Tabled.
and if appropriate, decibel readings
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Pl aced on Couneil
Of June 22, 1987
NOTE TO STAFF: Initiated faet-finding and if
de cibel readings
Meeting
appropriate,
Council Meeting, June 15, 1987
.
NEW BIISINESS (Continued)
Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Changes
in Appropriations Por the General Fund, Revenue
Sharing Fund, Cable TV Fund, and the HRA Reimbursement
Fund for the Year 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution 4g-1987 adopted
CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAgEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of a Resolution Confirming an
Invitation to the City of Lae, Papua New Guinea
to Become a Sister City and Inviting the People
of Lae, Papua New Guinea to Participate in Said
Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution 50-1987 adopted
CITY MANAGFR--ACTION TAKEN: Sent Resolution to
Pastor of Redeemer Lutheran Church
Page 8
. . 13 - 13 F
. . . . . 14
Consideration of Change Order No. 1 for Street
Improvement Projeet S T. 1987 - 1, Northwest Asph alt. ... 15 - 15 B
Approved
PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of Change Order No. 1 for the Repair
oP the Commons Park Filtration Plant Projeet �164,
Shank Meehanical
Approved
and
Consideration to Retain TKDA to Inspeet the Work
Associated with the Commons Park Filtration Plant
Projeet #16�4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 C
Approved
PIIBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAKEN: Compiled list of consultants
and how mueh they were paid both for HRA and City
Couneil Mesting, June 15, 1987 Page 9
�
NEW BUSINESS ( Continued)
Consideration of Change Order No. 1 to the Sunde
Engineering Contract for the Lake Pointe Development
Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 - 17 B
Approved
PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAKEN: Proeeeded as authorized
C1aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 8
Approved
CENTRAL SERV ICE--ACTION TAKEN: Paid C1 aims
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 B
Approved with 4 additions
CENTRAL SER1lICE--ACTION TAKEN: Issued Lieenses
E stimate s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Approved
CENTRAL SERVICS--ACTION TA1�EN: Paid Estimates
Consideration of an Ordinanee to Provide for the
Adjustment of Salaries for the Mayor and Couneil ..... 21
approved
CITY MANAGER--ACTION TAKEN: Have put item on July 6 agenda Por
consideration of second reading
ADJOURN: 10:15 p.m.
COUNCIL ��ETI NG, JUNE 15. 1987
1 _I : __ _ 1
PA GE 2
CONSIDERATION OF SECONO READING OF AN ORDINANCE
RECOD i FY I NG CHAPTER 205 OF THE FR I DLEY CI TY CODE.
AS I T RELATE S TO HEALTH CARE Q I N I C PARK I NG,
CHURCH PARKI NG AND GARAGE SETBACKS . . . . . . . • . . • . 2 — 2 �
CONS I DERAT I ON OF APP01 NTMEPdTS TO ENV I RONMENTAL
QUAL I TY AND ENERGY COMM I SS I ONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
► � ► �
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE
RECODI FY I NG THE FR I OLEY CI TY CODE BY AMEND I NG
CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "PEDDLERS" SECTION 14.08.
INVESTIGATION AND ISSUANCE, AND ADDING NEW SECTION
14 .11 . HOURS OF SOL i C I TAT I ONS. AND RENU�IBER I NG
PRESENT 14.11 THROUGH 14.20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 B
CONS i DERAT I ON OF F I RST READ I NG OF AN ORD I NANCE
APPROVING A VACATtON, SAV #87-03. TO VACATE A 6
FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILlTY EASEMENT CREATED BY
VIET'S SECOND ADDITION. GEIvERALLY LOCATED AT
6430 EAST RIVER RoA� N. E. , BY DotvhA 0�-sor� ,....... 5- 5 B
COUN C i L (�'�ET I NG, �UNE 15. 1987
� : 1 •► ► ��
PA GE 3
CONS! DERAT I ON OF A RESOLUT I ON APPROV I N6 A FI NAL
FLAT, P. S. #87-03. OL IVER QSON ADDI TI ON. BEI NG
A REPLAT OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. VEIT'S SECOND
ADDITION, AND LOT 26. REVISED AUDITOR'S SUB-
DIVISION N0, 23. THE SAME BEING 6430 EAST RIVER
Roao N, E. , �Y �►vrsA OLSON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 C
ITEM FROM THE PLANNI NG COMMI SSI ON h1EETt NG OF MAY
20,1987 .........................7-7K
A. CONS t DERAT I ON OF A SPEC I AL. USE PERM I T, SP
�87-09, TO ALLOW OFF I CES NOT ASSOCI ATED W I TH THE
PRI NCI PAL USE. GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF 77TH
P,VENUE, WEST OF P1AIN STREET AhD NORTH OF �SBORNE
ROAD. BY KEN BUREAU OF ROSEWOOD PROPERTIES, INC.
P�ANNIRC GO MM ISSION RECO MENDATION: APPROVAL
Y��ITH STIPULATfONS
�,OUNC I L ACT 1 QI�I NEEDED : CONS I DERAT I ON OF
P.ECOMh1ENDAT I ON
i'nIIN("11 h��ETI NG. JUNE 15. 1987
� ; � •► ► �
PA GE 4
RECEIViNG THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 8_ 8 U
N�ET I NG OF Jut�E 3. 1987 . • � � • • • • ' ' ' ' ' ' � � �
Q, CONSIOERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT�o Lo87
10. TO ALLOW A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING
15. BLOCK 3. MELODY I�iANOR 4TH ApDITIONANDHJANETE
BE I NG 7531 LYRI C LANE N. E. . BY JEROME
I�'FYER ...........................................
,,,, ,„� r�.��� � c c i r�h RE COMME NDAII4N : DE N I AL
Pj�;�v, s � � ,,,, ��,
S'ptlt�c' I L Ac7 i oN N� : CONS i DERAT I ON OF
RECOMMEPJDAT I ON
B. CONS i DERAT I ON OF A UACAT I ON, SAV EASTORANCH
VACATE EASEMEP�TS ON L07 4, BLOCK 2.
ES7ATES SECOND ADDITION. GENERALLY LOCATED AT
7710 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.. BY �. BENSON AND G.
BRADBURY .........................................
Pt ANN I(�G C0� �� � l� r� �N Rc rnMMENDA7 I ON : APPROV AL
WITH STI PULATIONS
�OUNCIL ArTioN NEED�: SET PUBLIC HEARING
FoR Jv�.Y 6. 1987
. .
. .
.. .
: . •
. •.
. .
. .
. •
i
('niiNCiL MEETING. .1UNE 15. 1987
, � , �� � ��
PA GE 5
I TEM FROM THE f�.ANN I NG COMM I SS I ON i`�ET ( NG OF MAY
6 , 1987 . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 1
A, CONS i DERAT I ON OF A SPEC I AL USE PERM I T, SP #87-
05. TO ALLOW OFF I CES NOT ASSOCI ATED W I TH THE
PR I NC I PAL USE : TO ALLOW EXTER I OR STORAGE OF
h"tATERIALS AhD EQUIPMENT ON LOTS 3. 4 AND 5. BLOCK
2, CASA REALTY ADDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH
OF 83RD AVENUE ANO WES7 OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE. BY
��1-B PROPERT I ES
PIANNING �nr�MicS�nN ECOMMFNDATION: APPROVAL
WITH STIPULATIONS
�OUNG I L ACT I ON_NF�D�D : CONS i DERAT I ON OF
P.ECOMMENDATION
ITEMS FRON'� THE APPEALS COMM I SS I ON MEET I NG 10 _ 10 EE
oF M�AY 26 , 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A, CONS I DERAT I ON 0� VAR I ANCE RE�UESTS. VAR #87-
�7 , TO DECREASE THE SETBACK FROM A STREET RI GHT-
OF-�"�AY L I NE. ABUTT I NG A RES I DENT I AL OI STR I CT. TO
DECREASE THE SETBACK FROM A STREE7 RI�CAB�FREALTY
LINE ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
FIRST ADD1710N, ALL GENERALLY LOCATEO SOUTH OF
83RD AVENUE AND WEST OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E..
BY M-B PROPERTIES .................�..............
10-10F
����a� 5 COMMISSION RECOMIMENDATION: APPROVAL
WITH STIPULATION
sOURCIL ACTION NEED�: CONSIDERATION OF
RECOMMENDATION
COUNC I L N�ET I NG. .1UNE 15. 1987
L� �� BUS ����cc ( fONT I NUEDi
( APPEAL S COMh1 I SS I ON MEET I NG CONT I NUED)
�A GE 6
B, CONS 1 DERAT I ON OF A VAf�i� ANCE REQUEST. VARK�aR�
j8, TO REDUCE THE REQ�IREO SIDE KA2� SYLVAN HILLS
10 FEET TO 5 FEET ON �NG 625BLRA�NBOW DRIVE N.E..
ADDITION, THE SAME BE 10G-10Q
BY RICHARD AND JANE FRANTA .....••.•••����" """
APPFH�� r��,M���inN RErnMMFNDATION: APPROVAL
L
W i TH ST I PULAT I ONS
�ni �t�C i I ACT ( ON NEEDEQ : CONS I DERAT I ON OF
RECOMh1ENDAT I ON
C, C01�51 DERAT I ON OF A VAR I ANCE REGIUEST. V� FSET
19, i0 REDUCE THE REAR OCKDISERBCEKCREEK ESTATES
TO 14 FEET ON LOT 2. BL
SECOND ADDITION. THE SAME BEING 1531 WOODSIDE 10R-10W
COURT N.E.. BY .JEN�Y RILEY .......••��•��••'•""' ..
�� �� AI S GOh1M 1 SS I ON R OMMENDAT 101� : APPROVAL
H� i TH ST I PUL AT I ON
�j�1Nt' �� ACT I ON N�_EDED : CONS I DERA7 I ON OF
RECOMMENDATION
II
COUNCIL M�EETING, �UNE 15. 1987
a ; ► •► ► ��
(APPEALS COMMISSION h1EETING CONTINUED�
D. CONS I DERAT I ON OF A VAR I ANCE REQUE ST, VAR #87-
20, TO I NCREASE THE I�"�AXI MUM PERCENTAGE OF A LOT
ALLOWED TO BE COVERED BY THE h1AI N BUILDI NG AND ALL
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS FROM 40% To 46.5X ON LOT 3.
BLOCK 3. EAST Ran�cH ESTATES. TNE SAME BEING 7770
RAtVCHERS ROAD N. E. . BY ELO ENGI NEER ! NG-BELT L I NE
CONSTRUCTION C0 . .................................
APPFALS COMh" I�� I ON RECOMMEPLD TA____L ON : APPROVAL
W I TH ST I PUL AT I 0�5
�OUNCIL ACTION N__EEDE�: CONSIDERATION OF
RECOMMENQATION
PAGE 7
10X-10EE
CANS I DERAT I ON OF A RESOLUT I Oh APPROV i NG A REV ! SED
CONTRAC7 W I TH SUPER CY CLE FOR CURBS I DE RECYCL I PdG
COLL E CT I ON SERV I CE 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 B
CON51 DERATI ON OF A RESOLUTI ON. APPROV I NG I-694 LAYOUT
IDENTIFIED AS STATE PROJECT 0285-49 (694=393). STATE
P'RO�ECT 2787-16 (694=393) . FEDERAL PR0.IECT IR 694-5
( �02) FaoM T.H. 152 To T.H. 35W . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 12-12B
�I
�
COU�JC) L N�ET i NG. �UNE 15. 1987
� : _ •► ► �
PAGE S
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGES
IN APPROPRIATIOhS FOR THE GENERAL FUND. REVENUE
SHARING FUPJD, CABLE TV FUND. AND THE HRA REIMBURSEMENT ,13 _ 13 F
FUND FOR THE YEAR 1986 . . • • • • � � • • • ' ' ' ' ' ' '
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTlON CONFIRMING AN
I f�V I TAT I ON TO THE Ci TY OF LAU, PAPUA N��: GUI NEA
TO BECOME A S I STER Ct TY aND 1 NV i T I NG THE PEOPLE
OF LAE . PAPUA NEW GU I NEA TO PART I C I PATE I W SA I D
PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
. . . . . . . .
COfvSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 FOR STREET
1MPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1987 - 1. NORTHWEST ASPHALT. ... 15 - 15 B
COUNCIL N�ETI NG. �UNE 15. 1987
1a� � 1 _ �► ► �
PAGE y
CONS I DERAT I ON OF CNANGE ORDER N0. 1 FOR THE REPAI R
OF THE COMMONS PARK FI LTRAT I ON PLANT PROJECT #i64.
SHANK MECHAN I CAL
AND
CONSIDERATION TO RETAIN TKDA TO INSPECT THE WORK
ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMONS PARK FILTRATION PLANT 16 _ 16 C
PROJECT #164 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ►
CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 TO THE SUNDE
ENGI NEERI NG CONTRACT FOR THE LAKE P01 NTE DEVELOPMENT 17 _ 17 B
PR OJ E CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QAI MS . . . . . . . . .
.................18
LICENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
, . 19 - 19 B
EST I MATE S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
�1 1 �
Tf� MINDTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL I�EE TING OF
dIINE 1, 1987
i
THE MINUTFS OF TI� R'�:GUI.AR I�ETING OF TFiE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF JUNE 1,
1987
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council Was called to order at 7:43
p. m. by May,�or Nee .
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Couneil and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
F1 ag .
ROLL CALL:
I�E2�ERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Couneilman Goodspeed, Couneilman
Fitzpatrick, Couneilman Schneider, and
Councilwoman Jorgenson
rEN�ERS ABSENT: None
APPRUTAL OF MINUTES:
COIJNCIL MEETING, JUNE 1, 1987 :
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes with the following
correetion: Page 6, Item 9, insert the word "unbudgeted" before the word
°funds" on the last line of this item. Seconded by Couneilman Goodspeed.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
�ie following item was added to the agenda: (21) Consideration of Extending
River Lots Addition Plat, P.S. #86-0�4, Reith � Diane Harstad, 6652 East
River Road.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, V ISITORS •
There was no response from the audience under this item of business.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE CREATING CHAPTER �03 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE
RELATING TO UNIFORM ELECTRIC FRANCHISE:
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to waive the reading of the public hearing
notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Opon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:47 p.m.
�e
COtJNCIL I�:ETING OF JUI� 1, 1981
1lze Couneil Chambers �rere overflowing With residents (400 to 450 persons)
coneerned about a franchiae fee being assessed to Minnegaseo.
Mayor Nee attempted to explain that this public hearing did not involve the
franchise fee, but only to consider entering into a franchiae with Northern
States PoWer. He stated the item coneerning the franchise fee is on the
agenda for a publie hearing following this public hearing.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Direetor, stated the Suburban Rate Authority, is a
group of some 30 suburban eommuriities that have banned together to work With
the utility companies to develop a uniform franchise.
He stated Northern States Power desires to have a franehise �ith all cities
in which they do business. Mr. Flora stated this franehise is the agreement
that allows Northern States Power to use the right-of-Kays in the City and
provide power to Fridley residents.
A gentleman in the audience questioned Why they needed the franehise as
Northern States PoWer has been in the City for a number of years and asked
hox they are operating now Without a franehise.
Mr. William Eldridge, General Manager of the North Division of Northern
States Power, stated the company Wishes to have this franehise . He stated
they have negotiated for several years with the Suburban Rate Authority in
developing the franehise. He stated they Would be opposed, however, to any
franchise fee allowed under the franehise.
A gentleman in the audience asked the advantages to having a franehise and
What would happen if the franchi�e was not adopted.
Mr. Eldridge stated he felt nothing Would happen, however, it has been
standard practice and believes there is a State law which suggests they do
have a franehise which spells out hoW they operate in the City. He stated
the franchise is nothing more than an agreement signed by two part3es which
outlines the rules under which they operate. He stated the franehise being
discussed does not impose any type of a fee upon the residents. � He stated
the question of a franehise fee is a separate issue and would take another
document to impose such a fee. He stated the franchi�e provides that a fee
is permissible, but doesn't necessarily mean it Would be adopted.
Since the pubZi� address system Was not working, Mayor Nee felt the meeting
was completely out of �rder, as persons in the audience who did not have the
floor, Were shoutfng questions in a disorderly fashion and expressing their
coneerns Without allowing a proper responae from the City staff or Couneil.
Mayor Nee suggested this item be tabled to another evening and poasibly meet
at the high school where they could accommodate the large crowd. The
response from the majority of the people in the audience Was to demand
action be taken this evening.
Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney to expl ai.n the reason for the franehise .
Mr. Herrick, Citq Attorney, stated the Fridley City Charter provides that
utility companies that use the public streets to deliver their produet are
-2-
COUNCZL I�ETING OF JUI� 1, 1987
to have a franchise. He stated the City has had some franchises in the past
and there has been an attempt in the suburban areas to obtain uniformity in
dealing With utility companies. Mr. Herrick stated he felt it is a real
advantage from the sta�dpoint of the individual suburbs, because they do not
have the staff or funds to negotiate every contraet With the util ity
companies serving their eommunity. He stated by joining with the Suburban
Rate Authority, there are some 30 suburbs that have negotiated the proposed
franchise with Northern States Power. He stated it makes sense to adopt
this franchise, because it has been negotiated over a substantial period of
time by those persons who are specialists in that area, and expected that
all the other suburbs, which are part of the Suburban Rate Authority, will
be adopting the franchise. He stated it seems the quarrel isn't with the
franchise, but the question of the franchise fee. He stated these are
separate issues before the Couneil and are to be discussed under two
separate public hearings.
A gentleman in the audienee stated a contract can be broken, but not a
f ranch i se .
Mr. Herrick stated a franchise can be broken, the same as a eontract, but
the persons breaking the franchise or contract may be subject to damages.
A gentleman asked who Was the City's representative to the Suburban Rate
Authority and the reasoning behind this franehise.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, and the City's representative to the
Suburban Rate Authority, stated the Suburban Rate Authority was established
to review policies of the various utility companies. He stated it took
several years to negotiate a uniform franchise with Minnegasco. He then
stated that negotiations have been in progress for two years with Northern
States Power to establish a suitable franehise that would be acceptable to
Northern States Power and the Suburban Rate Authority. He stated the other
cities in the Suburban Rate Authority are in the process of adopting this
franehise .
Mr. Flora stated this franchise gives Northern States Power the right to
provide services in the City and outlines methods on operation and rights of
the City and Northern States Power in the distribution of services. He
stated it is in the City's and NortYiern States Power's interest to establish
the rules on how the utility company operates.
A g�entleman in the audience stated that residents received a letter from
Minnegaseo regarding this franchise fee. He stated if a franchise with
Northern States Power is adopted, he would suspeet the City Would take the
same route to impose a fee on Northern States PoWer.
Mayor Nee stated the Couneil is considering an al ternative proposal Which
Would exempt almost all residences from the franehise fee. He stated the
alternative ordinance proposed would establish a franchise fee of 3$ ar less
on consumption in excess of 100 CCF oP gas per month or 5,000 kilawatt hours
per month. He stated most residenees Would fall within these limits.
A gentleman stated 150 people work in his plant and they have a gas bi21 of
-3-
COUNCIL i'EETING OF JIINE 1, 1987
#20,000 per month and an electric bill oP $10,000 per month. He stated it
is ludierous to say the people wouldn't pay Por it. He stated �rhen he came
to Fridl ey in 1966, taxe s were �17, 000 and he still has th e same se rv i ce s,
but taxes are now $76;A00. Ae stated the State policies have hurt business
and now the City is going to "heap it on".
A gentleman asked why the City needs this 3� franehise fee. Mayor Nee
stated the City is losing Federal Revenue Sharing Funds from �hich some of
these expenses were paid.
Several persons in the audienee responded that the City should cut spending
if revenues are lost.
A gentleman stated he finds it difficult to believe the City needs these
funds and asked What the City Was doing to save money.
Mayor Nee stated the City is attempting to charge for services they have
been providing to the utility companies for over 30 years at the taxpayers'
expe nse .
One person suggested an increase in property taxes so t�e entire City would
pay for it.
A gentleman suggested a committee be formed to see if something can be
worked out to cover these costs.
Mayor Nee stated the budget is �7,400,000 and property taxes gienerate about
$2, 700, 000 so the bal ance has to be raised el sewhere .
A gentleman in the sudienoe stated he felt Fridley may lose businesses, if
this fee is adopted. He stated two businesses on his street have already
left. Mayor Nee stated one of the businesses relocated to Coon Rapids which
has a 3$ franchise fee and believed the other relocated out of the state.
Mr. Riehard Harris, 6200 Riverview Terraee, asked what the City would do
with the funds raised from a franchise fee, and if it would be used for
capital improvements. Mayor Nee stated it would be applied to the overhead
in Publie Works.
A lady in the audienee stated it is obvious the citizens of Fridley do not
want this franehise or user's fee. She felt the City should not consider
it.
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated if the whole process was tabled indefinitely,
it Would have the effect of not having the franchise fee.
1lie audienc:e reponded by chanting they xanted action this evening to not
.have the franciiise fee.
Mr. Eldridge felt tiiere Was some confusion because the item the Council is
diseussing, under this publie bearing, is the franchise with Nort�ern States
PoWer and not the franchise fee. He stated Northern States Power would like
-�-
2.
COtJNCIL I�ETING OF JiJI� 1, 1987
this franchise because it is an agreement that deals Witli many items in the
Working arrangements with the City. He stated it ia not an exclusive
franchise and any other utility can �erve Fridley whether or not they have
this franehise. He stated there is a better Working relationship when eaeh
party knows what is required of them.
A g�entleman in the audience stated he felt the City would benefit by having
this franchise xhich establishes order in the Kay the utility company
provides services, but residents are concerned about the fee.
Mr. Dick Harris stated the public hearing regarding the question of the
franchise fee has not been opened and is the next agenda item.
MOTZON by Councilwo�an Jorgenson to close the public hearing. Seconded by
Couneilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing elosed at 8:�7 p.m.
MOTION by Councilman Fit�zpatriek to reject the proposal for a franchise for
Northern States Power. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a roll call
vote, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider, Mayor Nee, Couneilwoman
Jorgenson and Councilman Goodspeed voted in favor of the motion, and Mayor
Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE ADDING TO THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER �07,
ENTITLED "PUBLIC UTILITY GROSS EARNINGS FRANCHISE FEE":
l�TION by Couneilwoman Jorgenson to waive the reading of the publie hearing
notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by �Councilman Schneider. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried
unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:50 p.m.
Mayor Nee stated comments were heard regarding this franeiiise Pee under the
first public hearing regarding the franehise for Northern States Po�rer.
A gentleman asked Without a franchise, if there would be a� fee. Mr.
Herrick, City Attorney, stated the authority the City has to impose the fee
is contained in the franchise so if there is no franehise, there is no
authority for the fee.
Mr. Jim Anderson, Administrator of Public Affairs for Minr�egaseo, stated the
reasons they're opposed to the franehiae fee have been articulated, but he
would be pleased to answer any questions. He stated Minnegasco will carry
their fair share, but felt the franehise Pee is a diseriminatory burden
against people Who use gas.
A gentleman in the auciienee referred to the City's handout which Was
distributed at the meeting and requested a response from Minnegasco in
regard to the City expenses for the following: (1) Working around pipes and
shoring up poles when repairing streets and roads; (2) keeping track of the
2ocaton of the eompany's ineome-producing equipment - even on private
property - to prevent enchroaehment or non-authorized use. (3) providing
one-stop information serviee to the public regarding the 2ocation of ihe
-5-
CO[3NCIL NEETING OF JUI� 1, 1987
company�s equipment and easements. Ti�ese items involve staff time, computer
capacity, action by commissions and Dy the City Couneil, and retention of
thousands of maps, drawings, and Files; otherwise, these people �ould have
to go to the energy company oPfices in other cities to Bet maps or drawings.
lhis gentleman questioned the publie utility company's involvement in these
areas. He questioned if they keep traek of the equipment and have complete
inventories to which Mr. Anderson answered in the affirmative. 1liis person
then questioned Why the City had to duplicate these servioes.
Couneilman Schneider stated the next time a developer comes to the City with
hia plan, he could be sent to the Minnegaseo office.
Mr. Anderson stated Minnegasco expeets the City to assist in this manner to
make the developers aware there is gas and revieW the locations. He stated
the City has an obligation to manage the right-of-ways because they are
publie, but tYiey don't manage the reeords for Minnegaseo.
A gentleman in the audienoe questioned the eosts which the City incurs to
provide services related to the utility eompanies. Mayor Nee stated these
are not well-defined. �is gentleman felt some facts should be established
on how the City arrived at a proposed franchise Pee of 3� before the publie
hearing was set.
Mr. Anderson stated Minnegasco pays all taxes that every other company pays.
He stated, in addition, they pay the personal property tax which was
eliminated in 1972 for everyo� elae. He stated in not eliminating this tax
for the utility companies, they were told it Was a payment in-kind for
util iz ation of the streets. He stated no ot�e else pays this tax, except the
utility companies. He stated the City receives $13,857, payable in 1987,
Prom this tax, and the school and County receive their proportionate share.
A gentleman in the audienoe stated every contractor coming to the City for a
permit can be told to go to Northern States Power and Minnegaseo and this
Would not involve much expense to the City.
Mayor Nee stated the residents have expressed their views and unleas there
is additional information to be added, he Would call for a motion to elose
the public hearing.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to elose the publie hearing. Seconded by
Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimoualy and the public hearing closed at 9:00 p.m.
MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatrick to reject the proposal for a franchis� fee
for Minn�egaseo. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she Would suggest the Couneil direet the
Public Works and Community Development Departments to send all persons
applying for permits to Minr�gaseo and Northern States Power.
UPON A ROLL CALL VOZE TAI�N ON THE ABO�E MOTION, Couneilman Fitzpatrick,
Councilman Goodspeed, Mayor Nee, Couneilwoman Jorgenson and Councilman
�'L�
COiJNCIL I�ETING OF JIII� 1. 1987
Schneider voted in favor oP the motion, and Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
Persons in the audience Were angry and stated if Minnegasco had not sent
them a notice on the proposed franehise fee, they wouldn't have Irnown about
it. Mayor Nee stated the notice of the hearings on this item xere published
in the City � s official newspaper.
A gentleman in the audience stated he �ranted a special notice Khen items
such as this come before the Council.
Mayor Nee thanked the residents for attending the meeting and stated he was
sorry the publ ic address system was not Working and the meeting Was so
disorganized.
3. PtJBLIC HEARII�G ON A FINAL PLAT, P.S. #87-03 OLNER OISON ADDITION, BEING A
REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VEIT'S SECOND ADDITION, AND LOT 26, REVISED
AUDITOR'S SUBDNISION N0. 23. THE SAME BEING 6430 EAST RNER ROAD N.E., BY
DONNA OISON:
MOTION by Couneilman Sehneider to waive the reading of the public hearing
notice and open the publie hearing. Seconded by Couneilman Goodspeed. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee decl ared the motion carried
unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:10 p.m.
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Direetor, stated this proposal is to
subdivide the single family lot at 6430 East River Road into three single
family lots. He stated, in 1982, a lot split approved by the Couneil was
rejected by the petitioner and the petitioner is now requesting a different
subdivision. He stated the proposal was for a corner lot to be 73.39 feet
wide, the middle lot to be 65 feet xide and the resident's lot would be 128
feet wide. I�. Robertson stated in cor�junetion With the plat, there is a
request to vacate a six foot drainag�e and utilfty easement Whieh runs east
to west across tbe property.
Mr. Robertson stated, presently, four residences exist to the south of this
property which share two unimproved driveways off East River Road. He
stated the City and County objectives would be to eliminate these curb cuts
by providing a minimum of 25 feet of street easement on the west of the plat
and a 25 foot triangle at the intersection With 64 1/2 Way. He stated the
balance of the right-of-way, if needed, could come from the adjaeent park.
Mr. Robertson stated lot Widths should be as close to Code as reasonably
possible and staff recommends a corner lot of 75 feet and an intermediate
lot of 70 feet, (each five feet short of Code ) leaving 121 .3 feet for the
petition�er�s homesite.
Mr. Robertson stated there is a utility easement down the center which goes
through the building lots. He stated the next item for Council's
consideration is to vacate this easement and substi tute a i 0 foot util ity
easement along the west and north of the plat.
Mr. Robertson stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of this
-7-
COUNCIL 1�ETING OF' J� 1, 1987
preliminary plat with eight stipulations which he outlined.
A gentleman fran the audience asked about the park fees. Mayor Nee atated
these fees are pl aced into the park fund for park improvements and
aoquisition.
No other persons ir� the audience spoke regarding this proposed plat.
MOTION by Councilm��n Fitzpatrick to elose the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilman Schneide>r. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:20 p.m.
�t. PUBLIC HEARING ON A VACATION REQUEST, SAV #87-03. TO VACATE A 6 FOOT
DRAINAGE AND UTILI7'Y EASEMENT CREATED BY VEIT'S SECOND ADDSTION. GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 6�130 EA�T RNER ROAD N.E., BY DONNA OISON:
MOTION by Councilma�n Fitzpatrick to waive the reading oP the public hearing
notioe and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. tlpon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deel ared the motion carried
unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:20 p.m.
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Direetor, stated this is a request to
vacate an existing easement in order to provide for develoment of plat, P.S.
#87-03. He stated a new easement would be provided on the west and north of
the plat, if this one is vacated.
No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed vacation.
MOTION by Councilma;n Fit�zpatrick to close the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilman Goodspee�3. Upon a voice vote, all votfng aye, Ma.yor Nee deelared
the motion carried �unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:20 p.m.
Mayor Nee thought p�:rhaps the utility company should be billed for the work
provided by the Cit� in conjunetion with the easement.
A gentleman in the audienoe questioned the Work involved by the City on such
a util ity easement.
Mr. Flora, Public Wc>rks Director, stated staff reviews developments in an
area and determines the most prudent location for the utilities to make the
parcel more develop�ble and connect xith existing utilities in the area. I�
stated each staff person reviews the area of his expertise.
Councilman Schneider� stated he felt the utility company is really receiving
a lot of ber�efit for the $13,000 return the City receives. He stated it was
unfortunate the public address system did not work this evening, as staPP
had a presentation regarding the amount of staff time involved to provide
these services.
Mayor Nee stated the City provides all kinds of special services and persons
are charged accordingly. He stated the City is attempting to identify the
special coats Which are above and beyond what is grovided ta everyone, and
�
COUNCIL I�ETING OF JUNE 1. 1987
eharge for them.
OLD BAS INESS :
5. COISSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING CHAPTER 205 OF
THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE. AS IT RELATES TO SOLID WASTE STORAGE CONTAINER
ENCL06URES, HEALTH CARE CLINIC PARKING, CHURCH PARKING AND GARAGE_SETBACKS:
t�r. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated the first proposed
ehange deals With accessory buildittgs and this is an attempt to simplify the
present ordinance. Ae stated persons who have attached single family
garages and wish to add a double garage can do so, without going through the
variance procedure, providing certain conditions are met.
Mr. Robertson stated the second ehange regards solid waste storage container
enclosures and, essentially, requires sereening of these containers in
certain zoning districts.
Mr. Riehard Harris, 6240 Riverview Terraee, questioned if this ordinance
refers to all outdoor solid Waste contair�ers, regardless of size. He felt
the way the ordinance Was written, it may eliminate trash can containers
such as found in front of the City Hall. Ee was also coneerned Whether
existing developments needed to comply.
Nh•. Qureshi, City Manager, stated he believed this ordinance would pertain
only to new develop�ents.
Mr. Robertson stated the definition seetion of the ordinance deals With the
size of the containers and believed it exempts the small "garbage cans".
Mayor Nee stated even if this is the case, they are not permitted, under
th i s ordi nance, in front of a buil di ng.
Mr. Harris fe2t the ordinance should be more explicit to indicate these
small trash receptacles are exempt.
Mr. Robertson stated the third ehange addresses the ryeed for adequate off-
street parking for health service industries. He stated research shows
clinics generate more parking needs so the parking ratio is being ehangied to
require one parking space for every 150 square feet of building floor area,
rather than one parking space for every 250 sq uare fee t of buil di ng fl oor
area.
Mr. Robertson stated the final change regards church parking and provides
for at least one off-street parking space for every three fixed seats or for
every five feet of pew length in the main assembly hall . He stated i t al so
provides that additional parking may be required for aetivities such as day
care, classroom and recreational activities.
In order to give staff time to research some of the questions raised by Mr.
Harris, the following action was taken:
MOTION by Couneilman Schr�eider to table this item to the next meeting on
-9-
COIINCIL I�ETING OF JUNE 1, 1987
June 15, 1987. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimous].y.
6. RESOLUTION N0. 42-1987 APPRCNING A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #87-03. TO SPLIT OFF PART
OF LOT 13� REVISED AUDITOR'S SUSVDNISION N0. 103. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8100
EAST RNER ROAD N.E., BY BERNADETTE BEI�SON OF MII�rIEST SUPER STOP:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. �12-1987, with the
stipulations attached as Exhibit A. Seconded by Couneilman Schneider. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
7. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTI�NTS TO ENi1IRONMENTAL QUALITY, ENERGY, AND HOUSING
AND REDEVELOPI�'lENT AUTHORITY C01�4QISSIOIIS:
ENV IRONI�NTAL QUALITY COI�lISSION:
MOTION by Councilman Sehneider to table the appointment to the Environmental
Quality Commission. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ENERGY COI�ILSSION•
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to table the appointment to the Energy
Commission. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
HOI�ING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:
Mayor Nee stated he wished to nominate Walter Rasmussen for reappointment to
the Housing d� Redevelopment Authority for another term.
MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to concur with the nomination of Mayor Nee to
reappoint Walter Rasmussen to the Housing d� Redevelopment Authority for
another term. Seconded by Couneilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee de cl ared the motion carried unanimously .
8. RECENING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNIN�G COMMISSION I�ETING OF MAY 20, 1987�
A. COKSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #87-0�, KEN'S 1ST
ADDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF 77TH AVENUE, WEST OF MAIN
STREET AND NORTH OF 06BORbiE ROAD, BY I{EN BUREAU OF ROSEWOOD
PROPERTIES, INC.:
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to aet the public hearing on this plat for
June 15, 1987. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
B. ITEI�+S FROM THE APPEAIS C01�4SLSSION I�ETING OF MAY 12, 1987:
-10-
COiTNCIL MEETING OF JIINE 1, 1987
B-1 . COIZSZDERATION OF A VARIANCE, YAR #87-13. TO INCREASE
FROM 1� FEET TO 16 FEET (ABA1E GRADE) TO ALLOW TH
CONSTRIICTION OF A DETACF�D GARAGE. THE SAME BEING
�20 RICE CREEK ROAD N.E.. BY JAMES DAHL:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated this variance Was
before the Appeals Commission on April 28. He stated the petitioner
requested a variance to inerease the maximum allowable height of an
acoessory building from 14 to 21 feet, and because there had been some
objection to the variance, the Appeals Commission tabled the item to May 12
so that the petitioner could meet with the neighbors. Mr. Robertson stated
the petitfoner has now changed his request for a varianee from the maximum
allowable hei�t of an accessory building from 14 to 16 feet. He stated the
reason this item is before the Council was because one of the neighbors was
unable to attend the Appeals Commission meeting.
Neither the petitionsr nor any neighbors Were present at this meeting.
MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to concur with the unanimous recommendation
of the Appeals Commission and grant variance, VAR #87-13, to increase the
maxim� allawable hei�t of an acoessory building from 1�1 to 16 feet (above
grade ) to allaw construction of a detaehed garage at 1520 Rice Creek Road.
Seconded by Couneilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously.
B-2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE, QAR #87-15. TO DECREASE TI�
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM ANY PROP'ERTY LINE OR DRNEWAY FROM
10 FEET TO 5 FEET TO ALLaW THE 90 DEGREE AXIAL ROTATION
OF Ti� EXI�TING FREE-STANDING SIGN TO ALL(lW IT TO FACE 53�
AVENUE N.E .. BY V OLUME SHOES CORPORATION:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Direetor, stated this is a request for
a variance to allow an increase in the maximum allowable size of tWo
informational signs, for ingress and egress, from four to ei�t square feet
eaeh and reduce the setback from both the driveway and property line from 10
to 5 feet. He stated a variance is also requested to allow rotation of the
existing free-standing sign in order for it to face 53rd Avenue. Mr.
Robertson stated the hardship stated by the petitioner is they have no
direct aecess to their facility from 53rd Avenue and these signs will
greatly facilitate ingress and egress to and from their parking area. He
stated the only access to the facility is located to the west side of the
parking area and approximately 90 feet north of the access drive to the
shopping center property from 53rd Avenue which causes some confusion to
customers seeking entry to this facility.
1�. Robertson stated this variarice request t�as before the Appeals Commission
and they recommended approval of reducing the setbaek Prom the driveway and
property lir�e fro� 10 to 5 feet on the south side of the driveWay and gave
no recommendation to reduoe the setback from the driveWaq and property line
from 10 to 5 feet on the north side of the driveway, because the owner of
tYie car Wash to the north Wanted to look at sight lines to see if it would
-11-
COtTNCIL MEETING OF JUI� 1, 1987
interPere with his faeility. He stated the Appeals Commission recommended
denial of the varianees to increase the maximum s3ze of the tWo
informational signs and to decrease the minimum distanee from any property
line or drivekay from 10 to 5 feet to al1aW the 90 degree axial rotation of
the existing free-standing sign.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated this is such a busy interseetion and if the
sign is rotated, it may be more confusing for people on 53rd Avenue.
lrh�. Jim Golden stated he was hired by the petitioner to install the sign, if
the variance Was approved. He Pel t the sign at the southerly end of the
property Would be ber�eficial for this business.
Mayor Nee asked if the aw�r of this building or the tenants were requesting
the variance. Mr. Golden stated approval has been given by the awner of the
building that Payless eould install the signage.
Mr. Branden, oWner of the car wash to the north of this property, stated he
did not have any objeetion to a sign for entranee into the parking lot,
however, he kould not be in favor of an exit sign, as it would only be 10
feet from this business. He also stated he would like the sign no more than
�10 inehes from the ground. He stated if the sign is too high, it may
obstruct ihe vision of persons exiting his business.
Couneilman Goodspeed stated he didn't have a problem With the south sign if
the size remains within the code requirements and installed no higher than
�0 inehes from the ground. Mr. Golden stated he would make sure the sign
meets these requirments.
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to deny the variances to increase the size of
the two informational signs; to decrease the minimum distance from any
property line or driveWay from 10 to 5 feet; to allow the 90 degree axial
rotation of the existing free-standing sign; and to reduce the setback from
the driveway and property line Prom 10 to 5 feet on the north side of the
driveway. �rther, to grant the varianee to reduce the se tback from the
driveway and property line from 10 to 5 feet on the south side of the
driveway for installation oP one informational sign, with the condition it
be installed no higher than �IO inehes from the ground. Seconded by
Couneilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion earried unanimously.
C. ITEM FROM THE PARK & RECREATION COMMZSSION MEETING OF MAY �, i987:
C-1. COI�SIDERATION OF TERMINATING THE LEASE FOR THE
BURLINGTON NORTF�RN PARR:
MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatriek to authorize the termination of the lease
With Burlington Northern for Burlington Northern Park. Seeonded by
Couneilman Goodspeed. IIpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimouslq.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning
-12-
COUNCIL 1�ETING OF JUNE 1, 1987
Commisson meeting of May 20, 1987. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon
a voice vote, all voiing aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously .
9. CONSIDERATION OF AN EXTEIISION OF A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT, SP #82-12. TO ALLfJW A
ROCR CRtTSHING OPERATION BY PARR COIZSTRUCTION AT 7900 BEECH STREET N.E.:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated Mr. Prairie of Park
Construction has requesied an extension of this special use permit to allow
rock crushing at their site at 7900 Beeeh Street. He stated since the
permit was issued, only one rock erusbing operatfon has oecurred and there
were no complaints. He stated a seeond roek erushing operation is planned
for this xinter and extension of the permit is requested. Mr. Robertson
stated staff would suggest several stipulations, which he outlined, if the
permit were to be extended.
Mr. Robertson stated Mr. Prairie is aware of the stipulations, however, on
Item 6 regarding planting of trees, they Would like to subsiiiute plantings
such as lilacs and instead of planting vines, shrubs be installed. He
stated they previously had planted vines and they did not survive. He
stated shrubs Would be an acceptable substitute.
MOTION by Couneilman Goodspeed to extend special use permit, SP #82-12 with
the following stipulations: (1 ) this special use permit is extended for a
period of two years and re-evaluation of the permit is to be scheduled for
the first regular meeting of the Council in May 1989, providing there has
been one crushing operation at that time; (Z) the City be allowed Lo dump
their waste concrete material at this site in City trucks, at no cost,
credit alloxanee to be agreed upon, will be provided to the City for the
amount of waste concrete deposited; (3) Park Construetion to take necessary
steps to ensure the City and State noise, dust and environmental limits are
not exceeded; (4) the roek crusher, generators and stock piles to be located
as far north and east on the property as possible; (5) the same standards
regarding run-off be applied to this site as applied fn the Rioe Creek
Watershed area; and (6) additional landscaping to be provided by October,
1987 on Beech Street and 81 st Avenue including (a) street trees so on center
adjacent to Beeeh Street and west of curb cut adjacent to 81st Avenue; (b)
six inches of woodchip mulch on existing shrubs and proposed trees;
(c)provide s�rubs four feet on center all along fence on 81st Avenue and
Beeeh Street; and (d) continue slats in fence on 81st Avenue to Hickory
Street and on jog in fenee west of Hickory Street. Seconded by Couneilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
10. COISSIDERATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR RICE CREER BUSINESS CENTER,
7155 UNNEi�SITY AVENUE N.E . :
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated there are two types of
signs in this sign plan. He stated one is the sign on the building face
over the individual businesses and the second is a monument sign at the
corner of the development. He stated the staff has diseussed this plan With
Mr. Walsh and Mr..Winkels and, after considering several alternatives, it
-�3-
COIINCIL 1�EETING OF JIII�: 1. 1987
has been decided to install White lettering on the dark base.
Mr. Robertson stated the monument sign Was proposed for the corner, however,
this loeation is in front of the power poles. He stated the petitioner has
requested it be moved and this would require a slight variance as it would
projeet into the setback. Mr. Robertson stated a hold harmless agreement
would also be necessary with the property owner because of the existing
Water line.
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve the Comprehensive Sign Plan for
the Rice Greek Business Center, 7155 University Avenue. Seeonded by
Couneilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Couneilman Goodspeed to recommend a hearing for the change in
location of the monument sign and request a hold harmless agreement be
executed. Seconded by Couneilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor ASee deelared the motion carried unanimously.
11. CONSIDERATION OF A COMPREI�1dSNE SIGN PLAN FOR PARRVIEW BUILDIIaG BY DAVID 0.
HARRIS AT 250 COI�Il�RCE CIRCLE N.E .:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated staff has reviewed the
sign plan and would recommend approval. He stated the individual tenant
signs will eonsist of gold lettering mounted on a brick wall band.
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve the Comprehensive Sign Plan for
250 Commerce Circle. Seconded by Couneilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
12. RESOLUTION N0. 43-1987 AIITHORIZING SIGNING AN AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN
EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY LOCAL N0. 49. AFL-CIO (PUBLIC WORI�S) FOR 1987-1989:
Mr. Hunt� Assistant to the City Manager, atated the agreements for Public
Works employees include the Master Agreement and local addendum, � covering a
three year contract with the International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local �9. He stated about a 3� inerease is involved for 1987 and a$10
increase in the amount for health benefits. Mr. Hunt stated there are some
cosmetic ehanges whieh didn't cause any problems with the Union.
MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 43-1987• Seconded by
Couneilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
13. RESOLUTION N0. �44-1987 AUTHORIZING INCLUSION IN AN EMPLOYEE SEPARATION
BENEFIT PLAN FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS
DE PARTI"�NT •
trh�. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated over a year ago, the Couneil
authorized a separation benefit plan for non-Union employees. He stated it
was felt the proper time to deal with this question of a separation plan for
Union employees Kas at the time of contract negotiations. He stated it was
-1b-
COUNCIL I�ETING OF JUI� 1, 1987
the advice of the Labor Relations Couneil that this not be part of the
actual local addendum, but settled as a separate issue. He stated it is
proposed this be retroactive to June 15, 1986 to cover one empl oyee who
retired at that time. -�
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 44-1987. Seconded
by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
1�. RESOLUTION NO �5-1987 AUTHORTLING INCLIISION OF CERTAZN EMPLOYEES OF THE
PUBLIC WORRS DEPARTMENT IN TI� FLEXIBLE $ENEFIT PLAN FOR CITY EMPLOYEES:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated the Council approved a
flexible benefit plan for non-IInion employees and the eligibility section
indicated Union employees could join. He stated this resolution Would allow
Union Public Works employees to enter into this plan effective September 1,
1987.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 45-1987. Seconded by
Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared
the motion carried unanimously.
15. RESOLUTION N0 �6-1987 CONFIRMING APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
CONiNIISSIONS FOR THE YEAR 1987:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 46-1987 and include
the reappointment this evening of Walter Rasmussen to the Housing &
Redevelopment Authority. Seconded by Councilman Sehneider. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously.
16. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING OR REJECTING BIDS FOR_THE REPAIR OF THE COMMONS
PARK FILTRATION PLANT PROJECT #161:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Direetor, atated the Couneil received these bids on
May �1, 1987, however, the contract was not awarded as staff was to review
the specifications with TKDA to determine if there should be any
modifieations, as the bids were higher than was anticipated. He stated some
changes have been diseussed and elimination of the baekwash tank would
reduce the cost to $1,212.800. He stated in diseussions with TKDA and the
Minnesota Pollution Control Ageney, in regard to disposal of the backwash
material, it appears the existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System permit is still valid and disposal of manganese waste will not affeet
its use by the City. He stated based upon this information, it appears
additional modifications ean be made to the filter plant to aehieve even
further cost savings in the design and construction. He stated it also
appears in the near fuiure, the City kill not be required to deal with
backwash material and the State dces not anticipate actions to eliminate the
-discharge of groundwater into the storm system.
Mr. Flora stated the Couneil could either award the original contract to
Shank Mechanical, the low bidder, as designed; award the contraet to Shank
Mechanical and approve ehange order No. 1 with nine items for a reduction of
-15-
COIINCIL MEETING OF JIII� 1, 1987
�2�#7,200; or reject all the bids and have TKDA redesign the plans and
specifications totally el iminatig the mangane se and iron backwasb
req ui reme nt s.
Couneilman Schneider asked if the manganese Kas diseharged into the river,
if it would eause pollution.
Mr. Flora stated under today's standards, it is not. He stated manganese
and iron in the water aren't a health issue. He stated after discussions
with staff inembers of the MPCA, they don't plan on ehanging the controls and
mangar�se isn't a controlled item.
Mr. Tom Kirk, representing TKDA, stated iron and manganese are inorganie
materials and do not deplete oxygen and create foul conditons in the water.
He stated they do, in a way, pollute, but not like sewage or organie
materials. Mr. Kirk stated under the present MPCA system, there are levels
of iron and manganese that are a1loWed to be discharged in the river, and
the City cannot exceed these amounts. He atated at the present time, the
City can stay within these limits, particularly at the Loeke Park system
where there are provisions to separate these materials. He stated
everything at Commons Park has to be discharged into the river.
Mr. Kirk stated �rhen TKDA was designing the fil tration pl ant for Commons
Park, the Clean Water Aet recent amendments were under consideraton in
Washington, D.C. He stated it seemed there was going to be a great deal of
emphasis placed on cleaning up the storm sewer discharges, hawever, iron and
manganese aren�t some of the gross pollutants. He stated there are still
provisions in this Act for becoming tougher With storm water diseharges,
however, the City's current position is they do not expect that these
discharges would be controlled for at least five years, unleas there is a
change of policy at the State level. He felt the point should be made that
they cannot guarantee that, in the future, the City Wouldn't be faced with
separating those materials from the backwash water at the treatment plant
before discharge to the river. He stated he felt, in time, it would be
required. He stated there are so many more other pollutants now in the
river that this is low on the list of priorities as it is marginally
pol l uti ona bl e.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, asked Mr. Kirk if he foresees any rbew teehnology
that might make it easier and less expensive to control these materiala.
Mr. Kirk stated the methods proposed in the plan for removal of iron and
manganese are as inexpensive as they probably ever would be in the future.
He stated one of the alternatives Woul.d be to make a provison for the future
addition of the facilities proposed today and in so doing, it would minimize
costs. He stated iF all provisions or the baek�rash were eliminated, the
additional costs in the future to provide the backwash Would probably be
-about $200,000.
Councilman Sehneider stated, environmentally, it would be better to install
the backwash .
-16-
COIINCIL I�ETING OF JIINE 1, 1987
Mr. Rirk stated he felt everyone is in favor of pollution control and it
seemed With the amount of work being done at the pla.nt anyway, it may be a
good opportunity to make the investment for the backwash.
Mayor Nee asked if funds may be available under the Clean Waters Act to
eover some of the eosts. Mr. %irk stated money was never availale, except
in cases of lime sludge.
Mr. Flora stated it seems nothing will change in the next five years, but no
one lmows after that time.
Councilman Goodspeed stated he felt if the City does not discharge its
limits, it encourages the MPCA to liberalize the limits for others.
Couneilman Schneider stated if a pollution issue is involved and changes are
now being done to the plant, it appears this improvement should be included
if there is a prospeet it may be required in the fuiure.
Mr. Flora stated by using the shallow Wells, the City does have more
manganese problems. He stated if the City doesn't deal with the manganese,
the filters will not last and there is better water quality When the
manganese is removed.
Mr. Qureshi asked Mr. Kirk if TKDA was designing a new plant, would they
have recommended this baekwash system. Mr. Rirk stated he can safely say,
there hasn't been a new plant eonstructed Without recycling the backwash.
Mayor Nee asked Mr. Flora if he would recommend the City proceed with the
original design plans. Mr. Flora stated if ihe City is going to provide the
best system, then we should proceed with the original design.
Couneilman Schneider asked what staff had estimated the cost for this
project. Mr. Flora stated the estimates were 1.1 to 1.2 million and the bid
was for $1,450,000. He stated there are some items that could be changed,
based upon the 2etter from the low bidder, Shank Mechanical; and still
maintain the same design by changing the type of pipe and alignment of some
of the lines. He stated this would probably be a�40, 000 to �50, 000
reduetion.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contraet for repair of the
Commons Park Filtration Plant Project �`16� to the low bidder, Shank
Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $1,�50,000. Seconded by Couneilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated staff wou].d review the possibility of
reducing these costs $�0,000 to $50,000 and a change order may be necessary.
17. RECENING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR STREET IMPROfIEMENT PROJECT ST
1987-10 (SEALCOAT):
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for Street
-17-
COUNCIL MEETING OF JIII� 1, 1987
Improvement Project S T 1987-10 (Seal coat):
PLANHOLDER
Allied Blacktop Company
10503 89� Avenue No.
Shakopee, NIN 55375
Buffalo Bituminous
Box 337
Plymouth, NIlJ 55�42
Bituminous RoadWays
2825 Cedar Ave.
Maple Grove, I�AT 55369
BID
B OND
5x
5x
5x
TOTAL
BID
$60,933•73
$65,222.60
$75,2g4.13
Seconded by Couneil�oman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee deelared the motion earried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Direetor, stated the sealeoating projeet was bid
jointly with the City of Columbia Heights and the low bid was received from
Allied Blacktop. He stated Fridley's portion of the total bid was
$60,933•73 �d recommended the bid be awarded to Allied Blaektop.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award Street Improvement Projeet ST
1987-10 (Sealeoating) to the law bidder, Allied Blacktop, in the amount of
$60,933•73. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee deel ared the motion carried unanimously.
18. CLAINS:
MOTION by Couneilman Schtteider to authorize payment of Claims No. 14553
through 14729. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee decl ared the motion carried unanimously.
19. LICENSES:
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve the licenses as submitted and ae
on file in the License Qerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated it should be noted that
these license approvals include an application for a charitable gambling
license.
20. .ESTIMATES:
MOTION by Couneilman Fit�zpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted:
Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Haskvitz
-� a-
COUNCIL I�ETII�FGG OF JUNE 1. 1987
6�401 Unive rsi ty Ave . NE
Suite 301
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
For Services Rendered as City Prosecutor
For the Month of March, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 8, $50 .00
For the Month of April, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,9�44.75
$16,79�.75
Halvorson Construction Co.
4227 - 165th Ave., N.E.
Anoka, I�AT 55304
Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk - 1987
Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,102.95
Minnesota V alley Landscape, Ine.
9700 Bush Lake Road
Minneapolos, I�IId 55�138
Landscape, Irrigation & Lighting Project #168
Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $45,687.40
Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
21. CONSIDERATION OF EXTENDING TIME TO RECORD P.S. #86-04, RNER LOTS ADDITION
PLAT,_KEITH � DIANE HARSTAD, 6652 EAST RNER ROAD•
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated the Council approved
this plat on September 8, 1986 and it had to be recorded at the County in
six months. He stated this Was not done, therefore, an extension to the
recording time is requested.
MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatrick to extend the time to record this plat for
another six months to September 8, 1987. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT •
MOTION by Councilman Sehneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City
Council of June 1, 1987 ad j ourned at 11 :12 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad, William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
-19-
P[JBLIC HEARING
BE�ORE ZHE �
QTY QOiJNQL
Notice is hereby given that thQre wil, Pu 1' e in of th Cit
Cot.mcil of the City of Fridley in the Ci�y�a�l a� ��3� `�niv�rsity �,venu�
Northeast on Nbnday, Jtme 15, 1987 in the Council Crianber at 7: 30 p. m. for
the purpose of :
Consic�eration o£ a Final Plat, P. S. #87-04, Ken' s lst
Addition, by Ken Bureau of Rosewood Properties, Inc.,
being a replat of that �xirt � Lot 5, Revised Auditor's
Subdivision No. 77, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying
easterly of the following described lirLe: Commencing at
the intersection of the venter line of Osborne Road, as
nvw laid out, with the easterly right of way line of
Northezn Pacif ic Rail road; thence northeasterly a].ong
said c�enter lir�e of Osborne Road, 436.5 feet to the point
of beginning of the lire to be described, said centerline
has an assuned bearing of North 51 degrees 3 minutes 20
seconds east; thence North 15 degrees, 40 minutes 0
seo�ncls west, a distance of 436.5 feet; thence north 18
degrees 5 minutes 56 seoonds west, a di stance of 561. 7 3
feet, to its intersection with the north lin�e of said Lot
5 and there ternninating. Except that gart taken for 77th
Avenue and Main Street. Also that part of the Northwest
L4 of Section 11, �wnship 30, Fange 24, Anoka County,
Minr�esota, lying northerly of Osborne Road and westerly
of Main Street. Generally located south of 77th Avenue,
w�est of Main Street and north of Osborne Road.
Arry and all persons desiring to be heard s�hall be given an opportunity at the
above stated time and plaoe.
Wa,LIAM J. NEE
1�1YOR
Publ ish : Jime 1, 1987
J�me 8 , 1987
1
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLAPJP�ING COt�11ISSI0N (�IEETIf�G, t1AY 20, 1987
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson B�l�ings called the t1ay 20, 1937, Planning Cormiss' meeting to
or�ler at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL: �
��tenbers Present: Steve Qil�ings, David Kondrick ean Saba, Sue Sherek,
Uonald Qetzold, Richard Svan
t1er�bers Absent: tJone
Oti�ers Present:
APPROVAL OF t�AY I
Jir,� Robinson, Pla ng Coordinator
Jock Robertson ommunity Development Director
Ken Bureau, 0 W. Danube Rd.
Ray tJorms cker, 2809 Hampshire Ave. t�.
Richar arris, 6200 Riverview Terrace
9�7, PLA�aI�IP�G COhg1ISSI0N �1INUTES:
t•tOTIO�� by �i . Kondrick, seconded by t1r. Qetzold, to apnrove the ttay 6, 1987,
Planning rrrm ssion ninutes as written.
Upu a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson I3illings declared the motion
� rie�i unanimouslv. _
1. PUQLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATIOP� OF A PRELIMIP�IIRY PLAT, P.S. �fa7-04, KEtJ'S_
1ST ADDITION, BY KEN BUREAU OF RQSEWOOD PROPERTIES, INC.:
aeing a replat of that part of Lot 5, Revised Auditor's Subdivision tJo. 77,
Anoka County, tlinnesota, lying easterly of the following described line:
Coranencing at the intersection of the center line of Osborne Road, as now
la►d out, with the easterly right-of-way line of tJorthern Pacific Raiiroad;
thence northeasterly along said center line of Osborne Road, 436.5 feet to
the point of beginning of the line to be described, said centerline has an
assur�eJ bearing of North 51 degrees 3 minutes 20 seconds east; thence ��orth
15 de�rees, 40 minutes 0 seconds west, a distance of �36.5 feet; thence
north 18 degrees, 5�inutes 56 seconds west, a distance of 561.73 feet, to
its intersection with the north line of said Lot 5 and there terminating.
Except that part taken for 77th Avenue and t�ain Street. Also that part of
the f�ortl�west 1/4 of Section 11, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, lying norti�erly of Osborne Road and westerly of tlain Street.
Genera]ly located south of 77th Avenue, west of 14ain Street and north of
Osborne Road.
t�lUTIOtJ by t�s. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Yondri ck, to wai ve the formal readi ng
�e public hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unaninously and the public hearing open at 7:36 p.m.
1A
-
l L':
PLf1N�JIfdG COt1t1ISSI0fJ t1EETING, MAY 2Q, 19$7 PAGE 2
�
�-tr. Robinson stated this involved a plat of approximately 9 acres located
on �4ain St. betr��een 77th Ave. tJ.E. and Osborne Roa�i. The project was for an
office/warehouse type facility which includeJ two buildings--one building at
49,300 sy. ft. and one building at 63,270 sq. ft. for a total square footage
for both buildings of 113,000. This type of facility required a special use
permit wtiich was item 2 in the agenda.
P�1r. Ro�inson stated that as far as the plat, the petitioner was being
asked to plat because of a lengthy legal description left from the sub-
division of the �ohnson Printing Co. and also due to the fact that the property
lines presently go out to the center lines of the road.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff was reco�nending the following stipulations:
l. Park fee of approximate]y $8,937 to be paid prior to recorcling plat.
(exact amount equals sq. ft. x.023)
2. Developer to supply a ten foot bikeway/walkway easenent along Osborne;
subject to St. Paul lJater Works concurrence.
3. Provide additional right-of-way (25 foot trianqles) at the corners of
Osborne Road and �1ain Street and 77th Avenue and ttain Street.
�1r. Robinson stated he had other conu�ents, but he would address those under
the speci al use perr�i t.
f10TI0tJ by t1r. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared tlie public
heariny closed at 7:39 p.m.
�40TIOlJ by t1r. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Saba. to recommend to City Council
approval of preliiainary plat, P.S. #37-04, Ken's lst Addition, by Ken �ureau
of Rosewood Properties, Inc., with tt�e following stipulations:
1. Park fee of approximately �8,937 to be paid prior to
recording plat (exact amount equals sq. ft. x.023).
2. Developer to supply a ten foot bikeway/vralkway easement along
Osborne Road, subject to St. Paul Water tJorks concurrence.
3. Provide additional right-of-way (25 foot triangles) at the
corners of Osborne Road and �1ain Street and 77th Avenue and
tlai n Street.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared tiie
motion carried unanimously.
P.S. #87-04
��S F��t ���1 D
�
� W
J W _
.. . . . . . .. W � �. . .
• " �, y .. ... . . . '. _ .. . . .
_ —77TH--. . --AVENUE — --- --•— - — . . .._N.E _ _ _
. .. .....` . � i.NA➢•37'Ji"E . - ♦ziGi�- � . , . . . , . . i� �i� ,l/�t�rt ��� .
, .. _ . .1:.�°.a,
---- � �� -- - --�'. — _ _ _ . .� -� .
� � ' � -u� — � :.o OI t'C �t .
'^ q_.x
. . � - � ' . .7'
. • . � �'
— �.� � � . • . �4�, .'— , . �^•.��i..
� ;� � - ��, ,
� `\ � t �.., ^3�
7 ,
. 9/2
`
..\.�Z.. .. : � v �
�'� � , • r� .. ` . � j�F-.,�J<'£
� �., nn., • , . � •.� �bd!ti
, ° � ,1,�~ b,;. ,
`� . � • �
�, ��4 ' • s�,9 . ' .
i`,� � -� . � . � � : _ �, - •;�, �Fr . '-,� �:
- •�\ . .. �. . .
�y
� , • J
� \,\ . ' � : . qs. � ` . � � . . a e a � , � ' . • - ' \� , • ' ''�f 1.
_ �• , .
. � . � � . � � : ��.
'v` . , • . . . � �.
.,,1.. , . �/- _' l�
\\ ' [_ �,�t, � ; � � ` . � � _ +u�.• ' ,-' !.• , =' }••_
.r . . �� . � � :=� �
'Y /�. ..��2 � �~ ` �' •f/ ./�
� �• , .♦
,• . � n ' . ` I..' i� � �` / —4� V'�P
. Z1 ' � f:_ �.>> '�, , , o�'-r \� O��
1 � �
c ' , ' . ; / � :� � . . „33 ' '9
�` � \ ; j .o ',� . � rf�
s� r: _... . i � .� � .
: l '�. .��: . ;�
', ' ' � �
` ... M . , , � �% .�OP� �
1'1 � y� J, : • . �r,�i � rr�.��_
/ � :',�.
_ � � y �, .
` � y t��
. ; .;i� . �...�
. j'��� ��-; -
. ..i .y,
, - �-x � �' { . . .
. {',
. _ A . � .
. �
. '�! .
V
� ', O�
' I /� OG)0 . •
' � . / -
. // ,
%'
11 //, /,
� �'
\ • '
' • '' • -- -, •"'�
FINAL PLAT
1E
' %: �i
►/i\ i_ _► � ►1� i�.111]
ST I FI.LATlONS
1. PARK FEE CF APPROXIMATELY $8.937 TO BE PAIQ PRIOR TO RECORDING PLAT.
( EXACT PMOUNT EQUALS S�Q, . FT . X. 073 )
2. DEVELOPER TO SUPPLY A TEN FOOT BIKEWAY/WAL KWAY EASEMENT ALONG OSBORNE;
SUBJECT TO ST. PAI� b�iTER WORKS CONCUW�ENCE. (INCORPORATED ON REVISED
PI.AT r�c� I V� 6/ 10/87 .)
3, Pt�OV I DE ADD! T I ONAL R I(�-!T CF WAY ( 25 FOOT TR I ANGLES ) AT THE CORNERS OF
OSBORiVE ROAD AND MAIN STREET AND 77TH AVENUE AND MAIN STREET.
(INCORPORATED (xV kEVISED PLAT RECEIVED 6/10/87.)
. �•.�
�
CITYOF
FRIDLEY
�: •
FROM:
I1�TE:
SZIBJECT :
DiRECTORATE
Q F
PUBLlC WOFiKB
t�iEMORANDUM
Nasim Qureshi,� ty Mana9er
John G. Flora, Public Works Director
Jime 10, 1987
Main Street and Osborre Road Traffic
�ws�—iss
�.? o �n '
' �.�� �040
�"1► �1�
� �
�= �,��`b
At the Pl�+rruiing Commission meeting of May 20, 1987 in conjunction with a
Special Use Fermit for the c3evelopnent af Imsewood Properties, Inc. parcel
of the northwest quadrant of Main Street and Osb�rne Road, a question was
raised regarding the traffic and the imprwe�nent to Osb�rne RQad.
The Anoka Co�ty Highway Dep�rtrnent has pre�xired plans for the upgrade of
Osborrtie Road between Main Street and East River Road for construction in
1988. This imprwanent is in o�njtaiction with the upgrade of East River
Road between Glen Creek and Rickard Rnad focusing on the Osborne Road and
East River R�ad intersection. �e �unty's project wi1l provide for two
lanes of tr�fic in each direction on Osborne and imprave the intersection
with Main Street to provide for left turn and straight-ahead right
mUVe',�erits.
The 1985 Traf�ic Count for Main Street amounted to 4,50Q ADT. This is
about one-half of the nunber that uses Mississippi Street.
Based upon the width of the road and the proposed improvement, the design
should be more than adequate to deal with the nunber af vehicles which will
be processed through this intersection.
JGF/ts
2
a�n�rx� rb.
AN Q�II�NCE RBOODIFYING �E �EY CITY ��E. �� 205
F�ITLID""ZONING� BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205.04.S.B..
205.07.1.C., 205.07.3.D.(2J, 205.08.1.C., 205.09.1.C..
205.13.1.A., 205.14.1.A.(14). 205.16.1.A., 205.16.5.C.t7J
AI�ID BY Rfl�U1�ERING � I�T �N�l'IVE NU1rBPRS.
The City Go�mcil of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows:
205.04. (�L F�OVISIGNS
5. AiO� BUILDINGS ADID S�IQVI7F5
B, Accessory buildings and structures are permitted in the rear yard and
the side yard only, subject to the follawing restrictions:
(2) Accessory buildings and structures in the side yards shall not be
any closer than five (S) feet to any lot line except in the case of
additions to existing, attached single-car garages, where the side
yard may be reduoed to less than five (5> feet from the property line,
pravided the expanded garage will be no w ide r than twenty-two (22)
feet.
(a) The setback for an addition to an attached singl�-car garage
may be reduced to three (3) feet from the side lot line if the
nearest structure on the adjaoerit lot is:
1) a house located at least ten (10) feet from the lot
line; or
2) a doubl�-car garage which is located at least five (5)
feet from the lot line.
(b) The setback for an addition to an attached single-car garage
may be reduoed to four ( 4) feet f rom the side lot 1 ine if the
nearest structure on the adjacent lot is:
1) a single�-car garage which is at least four (4) feet from
the vommon lot line; or
2) a house with no garage; or
3) a cbubl�car garage at least four (4) feet from the lot
line.
( 3) All exterior walls, of attached garages, less than f ive ( 5) feet
from the property line, mist be oonstructed of materials approved for
ore-hour fire resistance on the inside with no unprotected openings
a,],lawed. The maximtan roof projection is limited to two (2) feet.
Page 2 - Ordinance #
205.07. I�1 CNFrI�AtQLY A��,ING DIStRIGT RHGIi.�Y7.'I(�S
-,:-. � �• � �s�
C. Dses Permitted With A Special t�e Iae�.t-
(2) Churches. •
(a) Building and site requirements and performance standards
shall be equal to or greater than those outlined in the follawing
CR-1 sections of the Code; 205.16.3, 205.16.4, 205.16.6 and
205.16.7.
(b) A parking requirenerit of at least one (1) off-street parking
space shall be provided for every three (3) fixed seats or for
every five (5) feet of pew length in the main assembly hall.
Additional parking may be required for additional church
activities, such as day care, classroom and recreational
activities.
(3) Private Schools.
� •�� � r• a� �a ti•�� ti:��: � �•
D. Setbacks
(2) Side Yard:
(b) A side yard of five (5) feet is required between an attached
accessory building or use and a side property line except as
stated in Section 205.04.5.B.(2) and (3).
205.08. R-2 ZtiVO--FAl�IILY T�)Fi�LING DISIRIGT R�C�IQ�S
�a, • �+• � ;��
C. Uses Permitted With A Special Use Permit.
(2> Churches.
(a) Building and site requirements and performance standards
shall be equal to or greater than those outlined in the following
CR-1 sections of the Code; 205.16.3, 205.16.4, 205.16.6 and
205.16.7.
(b) A parking requirenent of at Ieast one (1) off-street parking
sgace shall be pravided for every three ( 3) fixed seats or for
every five (5) feet o£ pew length in the main assembly hall.
Additional parking may be required for additional church
activities, such as day care, classroom and recreational
activities.
(3) Private Schools.
2A
�
���,
�
}
Page 3 - Ordinance #
205.09. I�3 �i�L I�.TTPLE �LING DISZRI4T RHC�I.A�IONS
1.`IC-. • �+: �iM�ir�+�
C. Oses Pe�itted With A S�ecial Ose Petmit.
(1) Churches.
(a) Building and site requirements and performance standards
shall be equal to or greater than those outlined in the follawi.ng
CR-1 sections of the Code; 205.16.3. 205.16.4, 205.16.6 and
205.16.7.
(b) A parking requirenent of at least one (1) off-street parking
spaoe shall be pravided for every three ( 3) fixed seats or for
every five (5) feet of pew length in the main assembly hall.
(c) Additional parking may be required for additional church
activities, such as day care, classroom and recreational
activities.
(2) Private Schools.
205.13. C-1 IACAL BUSII�SS DISiRI4T R�[I.A�ICNS
l. L1S[�S P�'Pi'ID.
A. Principal Oses.
The follawing are principal uses in C-1 Districts:
(5) Professional office facilities including real estate, lawyer,
architectural, engineering, financial, insurance and other similar
o£f ice uses.
(6) Fiealth care services including medical, dental, optometrist,
chiropractic and co�seling clinics.
i r.y i�• � : � � i�,.-ti � �• w• �r� �� • �
r�. • �+•� i s�
A. Principal Dses.
The follawing are principal uses in C-2 Districts:
(14) Hospitals, nursing hanes, �nvalescent homes and homes for the
elderly.
205.16. (R�1 GEI�R�1L CFFI(E DISII2I(T RHC��TIQ1S
1. RS�S PF�RI�'1'1'�.
A. Ptincip�al Oses.
The follawing are princi�l uses in CR-1 Districts:
(1) Professional affice facilities including real estate, lawyer,
architectural, engineering, f inancial , insurance and other simil ar
off ice uses.
(2) Iiealth care services including medical, dental, optometrist,
chiropractic and oounseling clinics. .
�
Page 4 - Ordinance #
��' �1��� '���� � ► �41�'�j�M1.
C. Parking Ratio.
(1) At least one (1) off-street garking sp�oe shall be provided for
each 250 square feet of building floor area except health care
services which shall provide one (1) off-street �rking s�ce for each
I.50 square feet af building floor area.
PASSID AND ADOFPID BY THE CITY aXJNCIL OF THE CITY OF ERIDLEY THIS DAY OF
, 1987
ATTEST:
3-iIRI,EY A. EI�'RLA - CITY Q,g2I{
Public Hearing: March 23, 1987
First Reading: May 18, 1987
Seoond Reading:
Publication:
W�LIAM J. NEE - Ng1i'nR
2C
.':; ..�
�.
:� ��
:�
•
.
C01�/tMUN ITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
MEMORAN DUM
A'�ND ZU: Nasim 4ureshi, City Manager
rEND FROM: Jock Robertson, Conuinmih' DeveloFnent Director �
c�rn rw�:
i.� .:� ..
June 5 , 1987
Agerida IteJn �5, Ordinance No. 205, Solid Waste
On reviewing the questions and oomments at the City O�uoncil meeting on June
1, 1987, staff reoommends that the entire section of the City Code dealing
with solid waste be more thoroughly revised and recodified in order to
elur.inate the present abiguities that remain because of updating over the
last several years. �is will take two nore weeks of draf ting and rev iew
with the City Attorney.
t�ar�+ahile, thLkotheare ow c eannswe have re eiv ed nosothezkcommentsland
ano cnurch pa g
reoortmend that the Co�cil prooeed to adopt these•
• .�
�5-87 -129
�
n
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED 'PEDDLERS" SECTION 14.08,
INVESTIGATION AND ISSUANCE, AND ADDING NEW SECTION 14.11,
HOURS OF SOLICITATIONS, AND RENUI�iBERING PRESENT 14.11
THItOUGH 14.20
The City Council of the City of Fridley hereby ordains as follows:
14.08. INVESTIGATION AND ISSUANCE.
n
�
1. Upon receipt of each application, it shall be referred to the Public
Safety Director who shall immediately institute such investigation of the
applicant's business and moral character as the Director deems necessary for
the protection of the public good. //and shall endorse the application in the
manner prescribed in this Section within five (5) days after it has been filed
by the applicant with the City Clerk.// Peddlers, solicitors, or transient
merchant licenses may be denied for the following reasons:
a Fraud, deception or misrepresentation in connection with the securing
of the perrnit.
b Conviction of an offense involvin� moral turpitude by any court of
competent lurisdiction or for offenses which relate directly to such
person's ability, capacity, or fitness to perform the duties and discharge
the responsibilities of the occupation, or violation of Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 329.
c Habitual drunkenness or intemperance in the use of drugs including but
not limited to the use of dru�s, defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section
253A 02 Subdivision 20, barbituates, hallucinogenic drugs, amphetamines,
benzedrine, dexedrine or other sedatives, depressants, stimulants or
tranquilizers.
d En�agin� in conduct involving moral turpitude or permitting or
alZowin� others within their employ or a�ency to en�age in conduct
involving moral turpitude or failing to prevent agents, officers or
employees in enga�ing in conduct involvin� moral turpitude.
e. Failure to fully comply with any requirements of this Chapter.
f. Enga�ing in any conduct which would constitute grounds for refusal to
issue a permit therein.
Page 2 - Ordinance No.
4A
3. If, as a result of such investigation, the character and business
responsibility of the applicant are found to be satisfactory, the Public
Safety Director within five (5) days after the application has been filed by
the applicant with the City Clerk shall endorse on the application approval
and return the application to the City Clerk, who shall deliver to•the
applicant the permit. Such permit shall contain the signature of the issuing
officer and shall show the name, address and photograph of said permittee� the
class of permit issued and the kinds of goods to be sold thereunder, as well
as the permit number and other identifying description of any vehicle used in
such licensed business. Each peddler, solicitor, or transient merchant must
secure a personal permit. No permit shall be used at any time by any person
other than the one to whom it is issued. The City Clerk shall keep a
permanent record of all permits issued as required by records retention
statutes.
14.11. HOURS OF SOLICITATIONS.
Solicitations sha12 be allowed by perntit holders under this Chapter between
the hours of 8•00 o'clock a m. and 9:00 o'clock p.m. on any one day.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF
, 1987
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
WILLIAM J, NEE - MAYOR
/�^
�� ��10 ( Ey �
E .�
. �.�;
� ;`
!,',o � , c�`r
4y-���
POLtCE DEPARTMENT
City of Fridley
Minnesota
DATE APRIL 9, 1987
FROM PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR, J.P.H
SUBJECT
REGULATION OF SOLICITATION
HOURS
MEMORAIVDUM
TO
VIRGIL HERRICK, CITY
ATTORNEY
NASIM QURESHI
DENNIS SCHNEIDER.
ACTION INFO
X
Councilman Dennis Schneider has requested that we exnlore the
possibility of including the regulation of hours of solicitation
to our existing peddler's ordinance.
Enclosed you will find our current city peddler's ordinance alonq
with material I have received from the League of Minnesota Cities
on this subject for your review.
Would you please advise if youu feel we could constitutionally
include language per Councilman Schneider's request, and if so,
what that language shoulc� be and where it should be included in
our ordinance.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
JPH/sa
�
X
X
�i
ORDINAN(� N0.
AN OR�INANCE UI�DER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER Z'0
VAQ�TE STREErS AI�ID ALLEYS AND TO AN�ND APPIIVDIX C OF THE
CITY Q�I�
The City Co�cil of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follaws:
SECTION 1. For the vacation of easements for public utilities described as
follaws: vacate the 6 foot drainage and util ity easements over
the west and south 6 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Veit's Second
Addition, generally located at 6430 East River Road N.E.
All lyi.ng in the south half of Section 15, T-30, R-24, City of
Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota•
Be and is hereby vacated.
SECTION 2 The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota
Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and
Appendix C of the City Code shall be so aanended•
PASSID AND ADOPrID BY THE CITY Q�iJNC,ZL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
L1P,Y OF , 1987.
ATTE.S`I':
S�iIRLEY A. �APALA - CITY Q,ERK
Public Hearing: J�e 1, 1987
First Reading:
Seoond Reading:
Publish:
3/ 7/4/ 8
WII�LIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
0
5
i- _, �► 42 sAV #s�-o3 5 A
iDonna Olson
i� � ,' 1 . .__.' ` :`•c , . _ � - - ..
1 ` iu•�rt •.;- ' "'
, —' , , . •D .\,. ,
� .qi�t � .
3 � � �5�' :,,,' ,':: , i,r � .
± •n ''' � � '.�r.'� �a I
�� .�, �.
, , , -�
.r� ^ 1 ` - � � .
_ . � N _ . ,, _� 5� .,�,4r � :, � ' . 6-==-�v4tS�StSS 4PP�--
' ��,•`£._ • � " =-' ,.��_' '
s' � ,i . � \` " . . • .. ,o
R� L� _N,�S 4 � . r: � .._. . / �.ai r; 'h
> � � �' ` � � + . ,f • ( ti . .�'�x , _ � i: �6 si - .[ f '' � l
' , � �� ' �.. 1 � `. � ` ' O lrl � �� W Ar'►" �SL'I�"
� _ ,- � N .. E.y , �W 3
�l � ; m NS F1. P�AC '•� -\ _..,. � _1. -- �� _ ,
yA `� �{ �i �O S�SS�P e' `� - . '��� �` � � � Z ��
��� �, ' � M,s . � ': ; �3 3 �; � :- , _ . � � �
� 1 ,� �`". ^ >. . �,�1 _ + J, '►•' �,-• .� a , , Q � l
�,` � ^��� :, :_ . � R � 0�• � � � � 1� - .� ,� � ,
D• P ° ' R� E �� . � - ' - _� -
o . - . �� -
0 : � . � ,I;. �t .� ,� .�_ ,,,� LUN�+; � ' _ F� �
, �- , t ��bR� r .1.. � _.� � ./ a
,� � I �' '� ,e,s ti� e, ;tcis� � � � � �•._ � ; � ,.n �� � C ,
(�� `.: ' � '�il, , r •�� � t" . r .;^ ;T. Z� ('�� ���1 , / � % � Z '��
�'� �1.• ��=��,- ` ".,: �°p , :ESrAr ,�• � 0 �
,�_ � r :: ; ,.. . . / I_ i�
(� t ;,�
� - � wp, O ::�,f►� 1 _ �...
_` I �'t .., 6q \/2-. :�:`•• .�,.�. .'�l �,,�. Q� ;�, '�� ` � _ '�y t'
. �:�5 ; -;26 �c 1�: .� � � �.�, _ cn ..� �
►. � .•
`/ .� :. ;� ,— _ i ,�
' j�� �' � � � �.� • 3 n _ — - " � =- -
'• . : t. :' � f'`.' . � '%�— - 5 i . . y is '+'
. � � . '� �' � , -- -
� , .,� .,..A: - _ -. _,,r..:- �. . ,� � . ,. ; ��
:� ' � �' 2s v, '� -
,; • ..y ` ,,. , 5 > % �°�' t •�. ,- . 4 TH WAY ,r ,
� , ,1 �'r /,,• `% �s� 'D , ; "�' ��� � �� � � � � � � + � 1
_ �. � r - ' ' 3 � . r %' ;: : � ,, ` �o s 7 t s + 3 z � i
. . �, �.� 3°, � , � :^ -' �• I
. '� •t : � �._. ,::- 3� 2 � 1�•:,� • •� �
�� . � , r
, ✓ � �I � . _ ,,. ��_ •�° �, �' 3 `� .� � vs t `e1�� � � � a
� � �= `► � ;;.+ jgl � �: h�;f) • ` 9 � '.' � /� � 7+ /9 ?D 3� Z? 13 � ,S 6 � �+1
��
A� , ;
. � a �g WAY ,. � '!_� /? .a * � ..
E .i: .
.
. *
�� �''t - ' � ' WAY i
� `� '63 ��2 � ';� �. 3 . 2 �'. I . �, 3 (/2
? , �' S - " �.i 1t� :; <� u.
�'`.`�� r - �-' �", ' :
m ,�, 6 � y) K) r ..,. � :: S� ,. 'S ;3
, - � Q"r' , - ?� /� �`O - � ' . • �� • • .s7> I ii �a 9 d 7 6 S �I 3 2 /
i. �/ ,, .
� f.. : {/ . . ft� � �% • �"? � 1 � � � � � t. � � . � � �
- s, ,ss>; :s'�� /5 /6 � ;� ;3
, � D' � q" � ; >�' ; , ; �'` ' ,
,
—+ � �, � ; ,�� � ,_ R VE = . � - �y , ��, "�.
�,. - .s __ a_., _ _ ,
�, ^� ,, .,� a: „�s.6 � r ,9 Z� ,. zz
7D .63 WAY -''' N.E. � = ` ) c1i1 (ll) ; �
� , D . _ f ,; _; .-• _.._. •
� - . " " _ a ' - 6- , ; $ Ro waY .
____ �. ' a _ _ 3 , r 3 % ,
, � ` :. �` .- , � � � .f_ • r ' M `� ` ! .,: .�; �' i. �; �i, � , " '�'
• - �: .. � ' _ .
�., „ ^ ., �.,� • :,,� ya 9_ d � � s � � 3 � ;
' `�, � A� .. 4 '• i) 1 !♦ � � � r
, -
� � I /� � . . �
'�. ��C: '�� 1 � '' ' . 4
i.+ ��- '' j � e•A•' �` •� = f •
� ; .�_ . . . �;. JA DEN • . . ; � .�—i� _f' ��' ��'� . 'd. '� ti: r�, � �. ;
` . � ' , .. 4� ;,` �• : /7 /S /! /7 /d '9 � D / Z � � �
- - - � 7 : � . `', '' . , � ;, , � �_� a . . �
, �� -' '`, � _ Y .. , �. � � < i
- � `�;y ' - „. : . . _ :C,.. I 1 . ' �
, �_ • � � �� = = ,.: ,.. �� � 2 I/2 ' WAY � ;
-- . ��- � .... .� ,,,, �; . ; .io� ION , �
.i : �• �
- � yt � ,-i �> . �D� r. ' : �
,. J�k. JY' �, : 33, „ Q � � •
'I !t. , �• • t � •.� J , j'� N� � O� :.� �
_ ��. . � u L �. �� t � . ��, t .
„ � � - • . � , . �.�r „ •.... , . _
�
SAV #87-03
Donna Olson
�
�
- IPiVO�CE Np `a���
LOT SURYEYS COG::•k1�Y, 1NC� u; ED'�o,ce-e=
, . 0- OE4J1E� �pON
LA�D SL'R�"El'OR4
�� IIEGt�TEREl1 C�UER LAMn qi 57.\T! OF �If]�E�O'fA �
T601 - 7yA Menw \art� �=�
M�AM��Y. M Mh1�N SSii�
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF� Eurveyor� Qrrtifirafs
OLf��ER OLSON �DDITION
CITY OF FRIDI.EY, ANOKA COUNTY \
rJ'`,iifJ
i�
/`,(���
�'
g �--�
/. ey,►
� ��
�
;�
,��";�.�
V �" �
..,,� �eZ��
\ �
�N
�� , �
aL�j�� ��L�{'��'''/ i yfi
i'
��`,`_' � // NE. Jo�,,. L
R� �
'-- /
'�I,r��°�' ` �� , � � A��� �
5.-•�
� • .% -- , . p
`///N� ,'��,n� `y` Q
� a-°- i� D DQ . ,( �� �
// •c O�Z,b v� °�`� � " . s W JP� :1
.+ . 9 0� �`�; s� "7 � "'i� , J � M1 N
/: � a' , � Yr���'' • +• .t1'?i'
�(` •" r • �- `�t � P
_40� \ _ %�� �j o°° ` Z9 ° �
. ,�- �o e�"� '�I
.p'� ` ��. �.t,
�%� � •'
.���� �
� �y.sa :
�=�'� � � ._4fi1►'.0 � - -
N
��
r�� j i���°
�'
•; �:•'''\° ''� � � ;
!�� �
I �
�«
�• .1e+.i
� -
.{�y^ � O /� � J�
= `) ��
B� /' i � �l
�.� v
�MN~
Fi��,, ... � �2�=%� �s
�
�.h.Y
ty� ��.
••" � c
��F```� � � t� Z �\
•
��,. mn .� �':�� �� O L� �il+�1 � � ° �i i
Z •, • /,i � ' t:11 �t�� o C
1 `��...c•. • � J�,�� v„w . � Q� V � � ' �
�il�. �, �y
/1 �
1��,,�
' �r
�+ti � � t `�'� „ "
/ �' I
•��w / - ' ;
se. t .\ � I
11 �1
��.\�AI^L
\ �,ep�
\ ' �
��'�
� v QQ � S T, �
/� /� �' ` G �\ti r
J.:
L. `�� � i ie
% •� • �
. � �� � �
e��` � � � ' � -
� w�" 0.
9•� �Q •��+ . � O
e,N e . � ` �Q
•�I ' ' \
�Ot �l'[11� �i►ti5'��
v�.t.�. .
'-►1f° �'� � � / j L i {,� \ \ \
�
r> �, r .
'e
,-• � •+„'
�l -1
�_ ..
a:. �r:e we. Ot:rer �lam -��ncr an0 Ge.eloper
osiv kas: i�ver Roaa
�ndie._ �f• `S�l:
vnax: �:•-SS�Y)
�:R�'e: E.. L^-t Su��'er5 •:Oq�:... �M.
't�.' ':r.• w•C.fue \O't�
r:r�r�:oita, �t. :Nif
vr,me� SN:-36+3
�.... �.,;�s 6isun� El�rauon
:a:�i Are+ • 39.:�9 Sp. Ft.s
�:; r - n,N'► x. F:.:
W 1• 1.1SL 5�. Ft.:
.: ] • ��.0� W- rt.s
� �G ,�__._.._..
5B
.�
�Ti*IQ[�1 N0. - 1987
. ���� � . � . . .� � • �; �� �, •� � r� •
WF�tF'AS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Plat, P.S.
�87-03, on May 6, 1987 and reoommerbded appraval; and
WHIIZEF�S, the City Cotuzcil also wnducted a public hearing on the propoged Plat
of Oliver Olson Addition at their Jtme 1, 1987 Council meeting and approved
the Plat at their , 1987 meeting; and
N(�n1, ZHEREFpFtE, B,E IT RESCLVED that the City Council of the City of Fridley
hereby appraves the Plat Imawn as Oliver Olson Addition, with the Planning
Commission stipulations attached as Exhibit A, and authorizes the Mayor and
City Manager to sign the Final Plat as prepared by Lot Surveys Company► Inc•
BE IT FUKI�iEEt RESCLVID that the petitioner is requested to reoord this Plat at
Anoka County within six (6) mpnths or said appraval will be�me null and void.
PASSID AND ADOFrED BY TE3E QTY �tJNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
L�,Y OF , 1987
WII�LIAM J. NEE - Ng�,YOR
A�TFST:
SHIl�LEY A. i�ALA - CITY Q,ERK
0
6A
►'F�Q-I IB IT A"
P. S. #�7-�3
►/i1 �--� = . C�►? �����
� : . = iC,T�
1. Pf�V I DE FOR THE FCLLOW I NG LOT W I Di'HS : A? CORNER 75 FEET B) M I DDLE 7(�
FEET C) WESTERLY APPROXIMATELY 121 FEET. Cj►�C%t��'-� �� R�= �T; ���V�� ����I�
2. PFZ(7N IDE A 25 FOOT STt�EET EASEMENT ALONG WEST OF PROPERTI( W I TH 25 FOOT
TR I ANCiE AT I NTERSECT I OM1t W I TH 64 1/2 WAY . PET I T I OI�R NOT 70 BE AS SESSED
F(� t�EW STREET PF�OV I DED THEY DO NOT ACCESS I T. ( STREET EASEMENT TO BE
F iLEU AS A SEPARATE DOCI.MENT, )
3. PROVIDE 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT (IN ADDITION TO PkOPOSED STREET
EASEMENT) ALONG WEST AND ALONG NORTH OF PLAT. (INCOiZPORATED ON REVISED
�AT �cE � vED 6/ 10/87. >
�F. ALL. FUTURE ELECTR! C SERV I CE TO BE UNDERGROUND.
5, Two PAwc F�ES oF $750.(� EACN TO BE PAID WITH BUILDING PERMITS.
6. LOT WIDTH VARIANCES ARE APPROVED WITH SUBDIVISION; CORt�ER FRCM 8(� FEET TO
75 FEET. MIQOLE FRCM 75 FEET TO 70 FEET. (INCORPORATED ON REVISEQ PLAT
�cEivEO 6/10/87.)
7. iMPROVE ENTRANCE TO EX I ST I NG HOUSE BY EL I M i NAT I NG OLD GARAGE DOOR AND
kEq21ENTING ENTRY.
8. NO ACCESS ALLUWED ON EAST RIVER RUAQ.
__ _ _
` 42� P.S. #87-03 � B
' � � , .__ � F , _ _ 4 ' - .. Donna Olson
� � \ `�" - . �
; , ` � �., __-�- . . _ ., - • - - -
� � , ,, y
r p ,. ,
� TppC1 ` � � :+
�r3 1 f•� �5�� 'I' '\'.�; .,• ?, S's��3j' '�
.,. � � , _ � � `,� "I� I
/ _ t �0.. `I,,,51 .�'�.'�Y;� �� � � . _ �.—
� _ hC t � • . •` �'���` . •
f�� �'7r► _M� 1 a < . - o, ., Fo �t
' ` '�, • �� � 'r ,�'� ( i,' v�s ±) j ;� /r�6s� .� 3 ,: � / Aru� �, ��i
.- :D ^.� ' a'�� �'1 � 1 _' I O (�l + �� .. paX �S�g'�
� ' B L �''-a' S � � AGE r y - : � 4, " ; =� / e W 9
NA �'T ' ;; m �� �� �Pc.`� P� � � �?� ��- r�-z ��' �32� Z 1__� . Z f� :
� � - •, � � M�SS`55 •-;9� ' . �,1, ;',; �� W . _ - w s �
�1 ,� a . ,,� . � 3 > _ >
� �5 °° 1, a . ; ^� i�:, �,3� L . p . - '�� .� a ,_ ' , ,.
' '` � �.�, o � - ` ' . - . : T'�: _ Q c l
?:.� y � pQ lo �� � � f C� . .n� AO •T � . " �' � . .I I % I
pp. mP ,;�.; �. R �,o ;S 1 �- ' fo,�,' _ — �,
`E f�ND�� • ,c. ' 8 �
�' �' � � i � �` ,-,:r� ,; � ' �'+'' jL
j�,o � I y' �. , +�`,-;%, ' y�'R�r 3Si = 9
; . � � � �01'/ Ya " : v�z�� �,.r �.,,.�' �}.l; �.. � .��/ r�. ; ; .�� � `�
PJ% 1 ����Ci/ ' ';i. !�. � � J/� �r ' o �� • � ♦' ?s �i�'�. C5�` � /, �� �� � ��' .w
� '� �' • s.' �;,.�� � .�~�"�;'s. . • ' : �ES�A��yu� I
., ,. P,�. . , O //
•NN N��� S ��J ' �•!'_ "' �j .. ' � H
z j � `".. ..�.� 64 \/'�, w� ..�' � � "�. ',,,,�: Q�� ' �;;a ',)� ' s = %� �"
''"' cn
� ; , � .� S . .:;�: :. : ��N,�..�:� ti�} � .�; r r � �.� i
- ;. � :. : �.
� •^j � �M����� � `,'� I'
� / /9�
. ,� '< � � . . , _ _ .
-° . � - _ . � �� -� �� ,
. : �� , � x,ti . ;. . � � q •. � � � � � - � i` , '1� 4' %S �ti
, _ + � " /'�� � � ' /` _
j •� i ��/ Y� a�qA' �• T
�
' � � � 5 WAY
'- " - � r� "~ ' ' � > j0��°� 28 `', - . 4 TH � .t, �
, � " •� .t_:� _`�—� _� 9��:�' � , �
'� ,tL' \ �s C •�� ,s .a o,
,�� .��• / �4J� � - °-�/� , '"� � � ti1 � � -- � - ��
' . ` 1 � . {'� �i '//
. F •:r 1 � \ � v � . _ . . ,3c),.. .'�'' . , ,,� /O t 7 � S � 3 Z : / �
• :. �` �-...� :; _ - ��, 2 i � r �• , . � I
�� � I � �-i_ , , �3�> � 3 �� `- • � - ,� a
3 �� �1� � �> 1 a' �. vS � le��� ! � � � �
�,?5 t► � < �.,. { �8) . � r 7'�f) �� 4 � ' If� . 7d /9 ?D ,3� Z,Z Zi � ,S f � .,7
` �p ,9� s ' w AY � � j r� � �� -� � ,,� � ,� �
� � E A ,,.� , a�� „ ,e
1 '^ � ' 3 1/2' '.;;, %�/.� ' r 2 �.-�.^ �• �' �'; � '/� WAY �'
. � G �_ 6 :, , , �s'� � 5 , s � 3 � ���` .90) I , ; i o , �
� � r.,;��'? � � � Hy � ��) � r. •.,, c: 3°' ±' �' j�' 3s
1 �� aB�' r`` a � -' r^ ' i tC /
.. - ` � A ` C , O ` , ; `- , ,. , ., s» I i� �'O 9 � 7 6 S � 3 Z �
Y �j +
r L..` . � ) � � � �
, ' ' ` i � ft�' ,�-. , ": `� I � ,� �- a �
`' A� T. >'�� ,. .s'��, rs��: ;-�� �/5 /6 i � T' jg� �
';� 3' ; m ; o; ; i ; �z � �; � K VE _ N> �+�, ��,;,
� � , � I,t3 /.! /S /6 7 �' /9 ,Z.� /� 22
'� . � .� . , o : ^ �.� .i z d % : . � " °- " . .
- . %Z� � 63 WAY ;:,e! N.E. " ;;
� �, y _ . f ,s -; .�• �
_ ('f'. , � ' ` 5 L 4, ,` 3 � 4 " , ° � <
' ' S � :° i�' 3
w ' , .� ��� .-, �/ N R:
;� . , - -f '�.,` ` _ �
�� ,r:.i � .. � .
'� } 9;_ .. f ,� , .A/� 4� .
-- w K : �'�� �r �� :,: . � .%� ��
�� . Y . , ,'f � �\ .�• �i • - ' .
3 _ � DEN ^• : , � : �• ����.
� •, ,, � .. A .. .�4� y r= . � ..
. _ > ;y;/) `%/,� , �;� f • ;, ,
:, -L, ;, � ,, �... M �
_ ,, � ''4,�•.; : A. 3 °" - ; :o>,� . ' ' . >
_ _ _ - '� . ,,. -,:= ,,., , ,
,�- - .... .� .;..3 . , . . � �� �ON
,: . . J,�,�� f�> " �, 33> i �' ;;. = QiQd� �'
.`Q• ,� •e• s r J.
` >� . �� � ' �� �r ,Z�) 1� r
'_ -', r, � t s •n. i:r. 1
: � . : � v � . ..,�.1� �e . �:
� . ;<, �� •� __ _ . .
�
,
,
.!
3 Rp �( WAY ` ;'
.�
,a :.
.i ;
�; � �3, �_� c�� ,
r��a9a�`s4�� i �
_ �t ` �. r �
1
�
'� '1� �8� ' (1) ��°�" �
� _ � y
/� S /s /7 /d 20 r 2 ;
,� , �� � � �
. �: : < �
2 I/2 ' WAY � ,
;
I J• Y �
. � �_ �` 1 ti ���
� �
�.� _----
..
_ _
� 6 C
RO ro
N� � 1 9 � / _ �
p.N• 9�,oP
� �'�• Gp,ycr+�`^ Pt G�'y _
� ,�
� � ��a� �� �
% ` '`� � DP� � 3b � � ' / a�''', ?
a2
� � ?' �1�co.�y.p�., �� . � -
,
S � s �
�
E P 9 �- R ��° �
9 '� _ / , j
U o o d� EPS ��Pp b �_, ��. ��,� F9 �
L � � G° / ' /m � � `�
� q. �'t J� N 5„ �"� � �, V ) - _
�� � L1ra �ri'J' ej0 '9 � L -�
a° o\� 1�3�� > ; z ��
� �s L'�3" 1d � 1,' - `�
/ • � �,g4s 1 �� \ � � � 1= v^
� � � � �* \As `1 � I 11 � .� !
_ _ � Q� � � / �� 9 ` _� � -
�1_ � q 9 ` /( m ; o � ` f, � _
L^ `0 1 � � ` \� �d � y � � _
s9 s �
�.� ,r� �� 1�O �+� ' p .9
t` � 3 � � �v' �, \iQ � � B �
. Q s � � J � �\, � rc�
�,,1 ` v ' � O�
� i r� X �'�� � � )
1 �
�',` � r -- d O� l:�
O ',���; & � 1
tl � .`` �` � a` O .
}� � a �� �.�y �� U.
� � �` `. 10 � ,\ f, (�'
~ 1 J
�? o �\3 1 N�� ��e ����
o � � 3�� o\ �1„� \,
U � �o �'�,� \ � o`� � ��
�-- Q �� — �
� c � � � e+
�_ Y ��,'' \ � � �O �, '� \ i �, ', � \ �
� 0 � 9 � r • ,,i t ' —' � � �
�� �`� � 1 i �/ �—
� �aH 1�
Q � v, ,� �`� �7 ��q r �
-� o`�p '1 , ° ,t� g � ,�� � �
�-- ,i. �
J't � �` `,) \ 41N2•`��30 � 9 ; ��� �
�
Z � , � � d11 .i �.
_.� � _� (�1�
\ YFg Z� \� � h `�' � !�
o �� c o Po�' � � �y---
a �
u .-( _ '��
0 3�,��� , o� ��-��� �, v t-�---
'� �m �of,� /�'� �1 O f
� . �%%a225 1 m• �� � -i►+r�"'�
, �, .
I O � T �1 � � ` / ' � J� s� �`f E �
` � J ��
� J �o � �� � �g \ i ��� � - �� � � '� �/
� � � ` �
� � `�O �� � � � '� ` ,�
W� , ., � �
l�i. 3 � `� � ' � � �-� ` � \
� '; , rN '� / ✓o Z� �° �i
� , � ��b
..� L`' Q; ` N .':�';� ; � / �'� q�' '�- - r
.■ O -1.
� `'� � � '� �•'' '� LJ p
}' � � � �' � �
� �""' '`1_ � � r,l� �
�
U ` 'o
REVI�S 4OPL�Art�,�LSON ADDITION
____ ., �
7
PLl1�iJI1�G COt1�1ISSI0N t1EETING, P1AY 20 1987 FAGE 3
2. PUQLIC NEARING• CO��SIDERATIO�� OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #87-09L_QY
KE1J BUREAU OF ROSEL•JOOD PROPERTIES, INC.:
Per Section 0. B. , C, , o t e rid ey City Code to allow offices
not associated with a principal use on that part of Lot 5, Revised Auditor's Su
Subdivision Wo. 77, Anoka County, t4innesota, lying easterly of the follow-
ing described line: Commencing at the intersection of the center line of
Osbarne Road, as now laid out, with the easterly ric�ht-of-way line of
PJorthern Pacific Railroad; thence northeasterly along said center line of
Osborne Road, 436.5 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described, said centerline has an assumed bearing of north 51 degrees
3�inutes 20 seconds east, thence north 15 degrees, 40 rninutes 0 seconds
west, a distance of 43G.5 feet, thence north 18 degrees 5 minutes 5G seconds
west, a clistance of 561.73 feet, to its intersection with the north line of
said Lot 5, and there terminating. Except that part taken for 77th Avenue
and t�ain Street. Also that part of the Narthwest Quarter of Section 11,
To��mship 30, Range 24, Anoka County, �1innesota, lying northerly of Osborne
Road and westerly of P1ain Street. Generally located south of 77th Avenue,
west of t4ain Street and north of Osborne Road.
t40TI0N by t1r. Kondrick, seconded by t4r. Svanda, to waive the formal reading
of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanimously and the public hearing open at 7:42 p.m.
Mr. Robinson stated this property was zoned �t-2, heavy industrial, and was
surrounded by other F�-2 except for the P4arquette Qank and the old Cub Food
building which were zoned cor;imercial. The special use permit was for office
not associated with principal use in an industrial zone. The two buildings,
as mentioned earlier, would equal 113,000 sq. ft., 4ihich was 29� lot coverage,
less tiian the 409' allowed. The speculative ratio for parking associated with
a building of this type for properties over 12 acres �•�as 1 stall for every
500 sq. ft. of floor area. This would require 226 parking stalls for this
project. The drawings presently sho�red 212 stalls which was a deficit of 14
stalls. One of the stipulations addressed the parking needed to meet code.
P•1r. Robinson stated Staff has been working extensively with the developer
and his consultant in defining the architecture and landscape elements.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff was recorc�nending the following stipulations:
1. Developer to supply the city tenant type and building area calculations
prior to each occupancy to monitor usage and parking supply. Parking
need, by code, not to exceed supply.
2. Provide at least one stall per 500 sq, ft, of building floor area to
meet code. All stalls to be ten feet wide, except handicapped to be
12 feet wide.
7A
PLANNI(JG COh111ISSI0N 14EETING �'IAY 20 1987 PAGE 4
3. Developer to construct facades as illustrated on original elevations with
recessed entries, brick corbelling over signage band and brick columns
in front of entries as shown. -
4. Grading plan to provide for berming, at least two feet above curb, alon�
all right-of-ways, to screen parking. Provide revised plan by June 9, 1987.
5. Shrubbery to be planted at the top and street side of berms; add notation
to landscape plan.
6. Refine landscape plan with additional shrubbery and increased shrub sizes
by June 9, 1987.
7. Provide five-eight foot high spruce trees on extreme southwest corner
of site to screen loading area from Osborne Road; add to plantinc� plan by
June 9, 1987.
8. Provide detailed foundation planting plans with trees and shrubs to break
up architectural mass by June 9, 1987.
9. Al1 green areas to have automatic sprinkling.
10. All dumpsters to be located inside buildinc�s or in enclosed masonry
structure.
11. Provide for steel posts adjacent to loading doors to protect building.
12. All roof top equiFxnent to be screened fror� view from right-of-ways.
13. Provide a comprehensive sign plan by June 9, 1987.
14. Provide evidence of St. Paul Water Works approval for all work in
easer�ent prior to Council approval.
15. Provide a comprehensive lighting plan by June 9, 1987.
16. No overhead doors facing any right-of-ways.
Mr. Ken Qureau stated Rosewood Properties has been in business for 20 years.
Over those 20 years, they have built everything from office/warehouse, office
buildings, apartrnents, s�all shopping centers. Their headquarters for the
past 15 years has been in Roseville. They manage everything they build. There
are a few buildings they have sold off to an investor 5-10 years later, but in
most cases, they have managed everything they have ever built. They are not
a company that builds a building, keeps it a couple of years, then sells it
off and doesn't worry about it anymore.
Mr. Bureau stated they own buildinqs in size from 30-40,000 sq. ft. of office
building in 6loomington to the largest one they have a�hich is the Soo Line
headquarters in downtown tAinneapolis. They have done everythin� from new
construction to restoration. They did the Renaissance Square restoration at
5th & fJicollet in Minneapolis.
[L�:
PLl1NPlI(dG COPI�IISSIOtJ ttEETI�lG, �1AY 20, 1987 PAGE 5
Mr. Bureau stated they have built in P1onticello, P�ew Hope, Bloomington,
anci Roseville, Minnesota, and also Ar9zona and Taripa and St. Petersburg,
Florida. '
�tr. Bureau stated they build quality products, and they pick good locations.
Tfzey feel the site and the demographics in Fridley are right for this project.
Mr. 6ureau stated the buildings would be brick buildings with burnished block.
Tl�e buildings were long and narrow, and the reason for this buildinc� design
was becsuse there was a need, especially in Fridley, for smaller businesses
that need a mixture of office and warehouse and that want the 60-90 feet depttis.
He stated the day of the large deep buildings, except for large users, has
pretty much gone by the wayside.
Mr. Qureau stated the buildinc� �•ras designed so they could have a cor�bination
office/warehouse 60 ft. and 90 ft. depths, and cover the property in such a
ti•�ay tf�at most of the office would face exterior streets. The buildings will
be built with a lot of flexibility for the different tenants.
Mr. Bureau stated they have access to tl�e site on Osborne and t�lain Street
and 77th St. so there should not be congestion in any one location. He stated
tl�ey would also have a series of retention ponds.
Mr. Qi 11 i ngs asked t1r. Qureau i f he was i n agree�nent a�i th the sti pul ati ons
as outlined by Staff.
Mr. Qureau stated he was in agreement with all the stipulations.
�Ar. Dick Harris, 6200 Riverview Terrace, stated he was an adjoining property
owner and he had several questions and concerns. He stated it appeared to him
with all the development in the area, that the intersection at P1ain Street
ancl Osborne Road was becoming increasingly over�oaded. Trying to get on
Osborne Road or across Osborne Road at any time of the day was taking your
life in your hands. He stated he understood this was not the developer's
problem, but it was a problem the City should address. He was happy to see
another development on this particular parcel, but he thought the City better
stop and take a good look at this intersection and make some determination
on how to tiandle the traffic and the additional traffic from this new proposed
development.
Mr. Narris asked if these buildings would be taxed as corunercial or as M-2
industrial.
P1r. Robinson stated he had had an extensive discussion with Leon tladsen,
City Assessor, about the issue of commercial versus industrial, especially
with tt�ese types of buildings that are'partially commercial in an industrial
zone. It was t4r. �1adsen's feeling tha� the zoning classification in and of
itself did not carry the weight in terms of dete►�r►�ining the tax, but rather
it was the quality of the building, the expense of the construction, and the
location that determined the tax.
7C
PLArJNIfdG COP111ISSIOtJ t�(EETING MAY 20, 19$7 PAGE 6
f�lr. Bureau stated his company owns property all over the Twin Cities and
basically it was the market value the assessor puts on the property, and that
has something to do v�ith what the building is worth, the doliars per square
foot times 43% times the mill rate. So, office, commercial, warehouse have
been taxes at the same formula all over the Twin Cities for the past 20 years.
Mr. Harris stated if they are going to go with office/warehouse type of
operations, perhaps the zoning code should be changed. As he remembered the
definition in the zoning code, in t�l-1 and t1-2 industrial zoning, the office
was incidental to the.manufacturing or warehouse. In commercial zoning, the
opposite was true, that the warehouse was incidental to the office or retail.
He felt the zoning code has really been stretched. They city has stretched
the zoning code a long way for businesses such as Wickes and Plywood Minnesota
anci busirless centers v�hicft: sho�iid probably have a different zoninc�.
P4r. Harris stated f�e also thought they were really stretching the special use
permit to allow the office/warehouse type of uses in industrial zoning, and
he did not think the special use permit was a good way to do it. Fie felt it
was unfair to tl�e developer, to the city, and to the rest of the developers
in the city because they really do not know where they are at.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff was doing sone research right novi on the zoning
code and have talked to a lot of other cities. Other cities are facing the
same problem, because there is not a lot of demand for manufacturing space
anymore. Some of the cities do not have any distinction between manufacturing
and commercial. Others allow up to a certain percentage for office either as
accessory uses or with special use permits.
Mr. Bureau stated he thought what the City had to ]ook at was what has
developed as a market. There was not a need for the industrial market in
the Fridley area, nor in the whole Twin Cities area. The need was for light
industrial. They are going for high tech operations--the need for some
office, some warehouse, and some showroom, and this type of operation allovis
them to be very flexible in bringing people into the Fridiey market. He
stated tl�ey cannot do that with the single operation warehouse anymore.
He stated there was nothing wrong .with the City's code. Industrial zoning
for this type of operation was all right; it was just that the terr�inology
of industrial has changed. There used to be warehouses that were nothing
but metal sheds, Now they are talking about attractive, expensive, Y�ell-
lar�dscaped buiidings, and that was the change.
Mr. Robinson stated an improvement for widening Osborne between East River
Road and Main Street was planned for either this year or next year.
t1r. Billings stated maybe Staff should have some traffic counts ready for
the City Council meeting. He stated the concerns expressed by �1r. Harris
were valid concerns, and he would like Staff to have some answers to those
concerns for the City Council meeting.
P1r. Kondrick stated he agreed with Mr. Harris that the intersection was a
hassle, and getting across Osborne by Plarquette Bank was getting more and more
difficult. He stated the people who will ultimately rent from t1r. 8ureau
are going to be interested in this traffic situation, too.
[ t'J
PU1���VI�lG C�M►�ISSIO(� t�IEETIi�G, F�tAY 20, 1987 PAGE 7
Mr. Robinson stated the City already has sorie traffic counts, but along with
the presentation to City Council, Staff could be better versed on the design
and improvements to Osborne before the City Councii meeting. .
Mr. Bureau stated maybe the Planning Corr�nission should request that a study
be done for putting a light at �1ain Street and Osborne. Something had to be
done for the area, and he would be agreeable to helping pay assessments for
the light.
Mr. Harris stated the problem was that the intersection was too close to the
lights on University and Osborne, and that the distance did not fall within
the regulations of the Flinnesota Highway Dept. to be able to put a light there.
But, he felt strongly that something had to be done as the traffic situation
was only going to get worse.
P�OTION by t-tr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Svanda, to close the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the public
hearing closed at 8:29 p.m.
Mr. Robinson stated he would also recommend that the following stipulations
be added:
17. All boulevard landscaping and irrigation be installed prior to the
occupancy of the tirst building.
18. Performance bond or letter of credit equal to 3% construction value
be submitted prior to a building permit.
P�r. Bureau stated he was in agreement with those stipulations also.
MOTION by P1r. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council
tTie approval of Special Use Permit, SP #87-09, by Ken Bureau of Rosewood
Properties, Inc., with the following stipulations:
1. Developer to supply to City tenant type and building area
calculations prior to each occupancy to monitor usage and
parking supply. Parking need, by Code, not to exceed supply.
2, Provide at least one stall per 500 sq. ft, of building floor
area to meet Code. All stalls to be ten feet wide, except
handicapped to be twelve feet wide.
3. Developer to construct facades as illustrated on original
elevations with recessed entries, brick corbelling over signage
band and brick columns in front of entries as s�hown.
4. Grading plan to provide for berming, at least two feet above
curb, along all rigiit-of-ways, to screen parking. Provide
revised plan by June 9, 1987.
5. Shrubbery to be planted at the top and street side of berms;
add notation to landscape plan.
6. Refine ]andscape plan with additional shrubbery and increased
shrub sizes by June 9, 1987.
7E
PLAN�II'JG CO��f1ISSI0P� MEETI��G, �MY 20, 1987 PIIGE 8
7. Provide five-eight foot high spruce trees on extreme southwest
corner of site to screen loading area fror� Osborne Road; add to
planting plan by June 9, 1987.
8. Provide detailed foundation planting plans ti�rith trees and shrubs
to break up architectural mass by June 9, 1987. ,
9. All green areas to have automatic sprinkling.
10. All dumpsters to be located inside buildings or in enclosed
masonry structure.
11. Provide for steel posts adjacent to loading doors to protect
building.
12. All roof top equipment to be screened from view from right-of-ways.
13. Provide a corr� rehensive sign plan by June 9, 1987.
14. Provide evidence of St. Paul LJater lJorks approval for all work in
easement prior to Council approval.
15. Provide a comprehensive lighting plan by June 9, 1987.
16. No overhead doors facing any right-of-ways.
17. All boulevards, iandscaping, and irrigation to be installed
prior to the occupancy of the first building.
18. Perforr�ance bond or letter of credit equal to 3� construction
value be submitted prior to a building perr�it.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Qillings declared the motion
carried unanimously.
�1r. Robinson stated the Special Use Permit could go to the City Council on •
June l, but since the City Councii has to set a public hearinc� for the plat
on June 1, both the plat and the special use permit will go to the City
Council on June 15; however, the.plat will not be app�^oved until the July 6, 1987
City Council meeting.
Mr. Robinson stated the qlat was being done at the request of the City to
clean up the legal descriptions and to convert the easements to right-of-way.
The key element here was that the petitioner was not subdivi�ling the land,
just cleaning up the legal description. Therefore, the special use permit
could be approved on June 15, 1987 prior to formal plat approval.
�4r. Bureau stated he could build without the plat, so he was not tlorried
about that; but it was important to know if the special use permit was goinc�
to be approved before he could move ahead with the project.
MOTIOW by �1r. Betzold, seconded by Mr, Kondrick, to recor�mend to City Council
that the Special Use Permit, SP #87-09 be considered separately fror� the plat
and that ti�e City Council consider approval or disapproval of the special use
permit on its own merits at the June 15th City Council meeting.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanimously.
_ _
sP # s�-o9 7 F
Ken Bureau
i-
� '�ti.� ^�' '"-..�',�;y
�� ~ + �ry��^�.,�-`� ' '� / I �
� "��y- �� M�� -�y��r.�=���'x,
�a`• �~ti j�,��"���.`�. �~ ~ '�vy� �
� %'y ti�ti+� } � ~ I
M �: •� �l"W�.l`��'+.�.
^v -., ��,�,, i.+� ,
..� 1�: _" ti;. :ti,�:�,�;,�;.,":,',.'; ��_. � ,� � � �
r� ;'", ;,,-. ' .;.��ti��,,,�';+:y�y �;�.
�. . -. �' .'-. '^-.''`'..''*��'. ,
(' �.,, •• • . '+.�•^�� �`•�:,~�•`„�. r': ��,
.'j `ti `.,-' .
' i� �. �•� 4 �?f: `'�:17'''��;ti.�''N''-."`%{ :�; .`'�r`�'�'' "hy�'t'� '-'.:-x,�• w.�` .-,.,� •�
�' ~%'ti '��".� *S yti:�~ �'' 4'��' ~ ��'." � %�',��"�. ��^x���`^-�., �'�;'.
�•�'�, �
��'� `��.:.�:.;� '.. �'`ti.�';.,'..' %.`�.,�`_;:_: `.
�� �=:�..;;.-:: ��
�r. �: ;��.� � , 7, _���,, ;�
•'�y� 4'•1•' , �
�~ ti � �'.
�'''�- `�i..�. `.
`i , ""' ;. �`�%i�., ' �'•'�' ��'''.; .�'-.,`7,:�
\4 v y y ~+. ,� . � ��^l�.f��.,����� .
- � . `vw 4 ^. �+-. ��. ti��'+; .
'+� .,� ..�`tii'ti.tiJ�'
�~� ����� ���'.
~ '�''� ��"'..`~�r�:.-...����'::..
. �� -. '_.^%�,'�`:�� ,k�-'.�.zrti{'
..
� , y `"v / i, ��:� M1L
� � l.+.y�
��".sy �'` ti � ti� r,,. �ti�
�: iy�`: •
�
•� � � xl I
_ � � ._
,> ��`
, M � � �Y
�
osl 3 .,f)
ti�,�,
,so�i 4 ,
\ ,�
�
� �
.
A
-�
�
,�
,
., e
,.�, '
\ `
' `� � �
Q �,,
�`� �
a\ `�
�' � / .�s
,�'� f %,�� . ��'
� � �y�� o�.� �
� � \ /��' �� �
M� .,._ E ��,�. t'
�o
� �
� j(
� �.
P�• , 1
/ I
,.�(�' I
-�-
(n�
• •,� -.;
,
c� .,
-,
�,
_' ' — ..� � `� \•,` ��
1� \� yy ' ,
�;� ; � � 1� `..�=; 1,�
. ,
I�,. � �� � . ' Q
' � � 1 ���', �
� ,
' �� ,, � � \'� �i' �•ov;�� s
� � � � i�
i� � a �; 1 �' . �
:���;1�`� ` ��1
,` , ,
� �
,
r;. F ;� 11,1
-' �
� ,,. ,� ���
�
. ��-,. ����. .�._t- . .,
0
i�,�
(2�001
�
:
ATION MAP
-_ _ 7 G .
; :�;
�-�. Wi ;:; �
.<��` �,�\ � �t� U .
c ; ��� i'�� r/ 2 2 . A
`_' ��� `�\ �\ �� /� O Q ` ,
��� . � a\ .. ;., � �' / j a s , .
v _i.l
� • ' ;��i i, • ¢ W
\\\ `L ,� ,`.. � � y a i . ,
�
t `e� ! � ` � a`s.'s5�" a����\ 1�.� � , / o o � ' �
i. • 4 .°� � \` ` � � , 0 2 2
I� �� � �� •;�:; � � � � o a
I "� "` i - . ��`'..�;� �'.., �� r � I 3 ..�
� � � s, �������,, � � _ ������/ n k � Q "
� 1' � ' I' , ` " k_�.'� �''` �^�-�,� ' � a
.,.R.,.-�..., 4 �� • % , �.s ��;- - ��„ �.� �•� : � -� _ _,��
� ...t��i�� ` ' ,,. s.�.� y�y� R`�\ °' _ `�jy��° ' `�
��1� \`�
,' I ,` t / �` , y ' , r'. . ��Y`\ _\ l�( R s
� � J� a.( 2 � „ \ I . . /'/ . `� / ••l/.'���� ` � � �
� . �:1� ,r/ \�" ` , ,�'� : a , T ' i'��'� 2 d 7 s '
� ' • ' 6 ' � �+ ' � ; �'� /� O �t Y i� Y
' ' ' .r.+� ? � ' � +:' j ��"' �J Q= i: : : :
� :, �� � , .,., � � �� tl � � �� �r �
; =i ' '�= • €• "�° � :� ��}i� � o;� �Y .
� � , �a � a �1 �;� '�"
�y_ �� ��.Ri o tr
$ � � f i � � t ��� j�� ` �� '�' I Q sg �� • �
� � . ° �.p� : � ` - '+� S + � ', �, ` Z > c � � -
: � � . �`} � y`, ` o o �g
� i � •�': � . � - �\ � '�����'� �.' i� '� agN �M � �
� � ' , 1 �r'��• , i ♦ ' � 1•�`��'^ � ��Q ..�.,\
� i I � L �e � � � � ���\\ i ` tj
� i I1 I � � i\�\�� .., ��J�. \ .
I i � �
�l olr ., � t - � ::\. i �! >>'� �. � �•i
j t� .�,� , t i ,��#_ � � . � ��� �� �. � ���� �e i . � j� —
����II ; \ t � � '. ' \ .p � � I
j �:{i � • �1 '. . � _ ` . �` � _' _ i
;i ` : , � `t _ y,• �1 . !�W � : f ;.
�
j i \ _' '+ . . �� %'�� �� �.. +- " I .
? ��.;; ; � �� � : � .. /, �♦ � � �� \� ; S n . / r
��� . '� � r , � r: \
� �'; � t ' � ".� 1(�� % ,. '�\ ' , �
, ; ; ; � ' , ';�� � _� � L ,
y � � � r �,� � � ; � �---+-
�,j `, ` '; '; 4 �� '� a � , �\ � \ 4 = � '. �, , .�
� ,; �; �; �. � � • " \\ � \, � , � ��_, .' ;
� � %' ;� \ � � `'` � � �. ;,;` . . ? `, �
^ , • : .
, i . i. . . ; �.
--� -_....i � � \ �. �,�, ` �i � , 1 � .. �;, 1�,` `�f, � � � � �
I' ', �" - `N 4 ' � ' � i :� �•' Zr,, , ' �
- { � , Ti � �-� � ' _ , . � ,is� `�;
. r� ', - a f e.w` : / �� ',-- � :� \ �i � r� � �
, ti � ; 1 �
1 i' ` � `. ''' :}. '' : � �? _ ' � ' �
�
, .� �
; ; � ' � Y �..`�� . �, , ...Z v ' -E� �_ � � `
1 � � . � �y , ..�\ � ' S\ � 1�„' � ' `' 1
i� i ;I ' � �- 1 ` .?► E .. '`\� Y� r' � ' /
� � � � �� � � �
I;I .r'� y?/ r•.� � . \ .l� �:�,+ �I ��1p0 �,l -. �� ` -%
� l• � �- � =� . '� � . , ti�.s� , . � � �
11� r `��,. ` �72 y �;:u.,Ja,4 T 1^ i�����/
1 1 � � � y � i j � i - ' i
1 i i I "` .e. �� I �• a4� ' \1 � � � �/i ` :, � }! �, ` '
�� 1 � 3 � t � �`��s� y i�
iI i i� �f S�' s � � � � \'`�` ` ,f` '•v`rrR/� t .���y �'/ � ~ • �/
j{� � I �`y� E. , , ,��� � % �
�' � �� .. "-/ � -t` : 1 : ,, �, , ,',
�� �' J � � 15 ` +•' �\.k tj•`_`y �,� -..f � � j��
$,i i �- ; � �. , � ' ,S �` ��, `,� f
�, � , � _ ,. _ i � �� ' ��....:s" �t �.J, , _ ^\ 1 `'
It �t �\ ��` / � � 1,� `,� `\.w"' ��'"� j� � , ", � � i ' �
� 1/ �: ,_., � -»� : � 1� / � I
Fcr�•:, .\.�ys /_^'L,' � - @_,rft �-"� f � , �/ �! ,
- rt ` � r � 3' � / � � ! �. ,
�� .� 3 �•� � � ' � / � � .
i ��� �"� l ` '" .✓''�- � _ / a . - _ . . _ . _ . ; � � I + 1 '
I r � "%�' ,.-� , : ' - „o�j� � . . � : � � � '. I ' I
,
� f` i
, � � _ �
.
..
. ,, .. . . �,,i � : � ��
, ' } � � "l . - ' - / t S I �
., � -j - -- - _ �,� y
" . ,. � t �.
- ' . - . . ' __ �/ ' � . � i � � �,
/ . � � ' `� - , � � + �
� !:
� ♦ �� " ,- _ j/ ; , � { j i, � i ,: ; i I % � �'
r j }�: 3 i �_ ... i:i � v � i '
. w�� . j � : � : i : :: � :. _ . . ;. i � ' . {
- _. � � - !i i . .�ti e 1 � : I
. . i � i. j . i , . - . , .. . .
REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN 6l0�187
��
1;
:v
�r
VLL
W�
`
�
o�>
J�
Z.
OO
� '
�a
W
J
W
y
�
J
d
�
F� �
f
dY
EVISED
Y
v
0
a'
oa
Jj
�O
O
s+
Y
V
O
a
J a
ZO
; O
ELEVA
7H
Z
0 .
�" �
i_
> :•
W,�
J
W
Y
U
0
G
C7
2
O
<
O
J
J
<
�= r
Q �
0.7
NS - 6/09/�7
- - ___ _ - � _ -�:: � �.r� r � - _
.. - -----
, : : �� , 7 t
;
, � , _ -> � .�,: i
,� ;� ,�-�r�� �'�P,"t ny"4,,�;, _. J /
J }
�^ �3� � � � ; �1� �� `'� 3 2 � : y ' � i� / ,
� V �w i 1 � � ,
,,,� - �,.� -il� _ ^y 1 = � , ,; .
�o r `� � 7� � `iij r c +} �' _ _ , � „t` / � '� .
� • e 1i,�.�.�4�� " . . ' - �� �-� �.
� O i'�'��.�YF'`L„�,?� 1 ,� � �{ .�� i.` -L—' �i" �' � �j // �� - ,
� _ . . ji �.Gr.� yr ; � r/...� l.i,�.tl. � . � i �"" � //
z � � ` � .• � �' 'F; i � — __ - -1 , �.'� / ! �- � �: � � '
' � 7� � • }4�}t� tsy � n .. / /" -' . / F
y '�� �
Iw � ~
�� J S" �' ' � � i.
� 1 t'�, � E � `�'a�.�z.r.;L?� r t .�.� �ii � / _ / � �� � �/ � � i ,, i.
A` � , , ' - � ��,.*° r , i,
l�j �`ry�!'��? .�y"�� #t� s," � //d.c+ - /� /��. .
/ :� ,,r' , � /- , �
'� ; �^� - ,.- ''"` � % , - " .1
� �� � -� "� �° �- �
',� �'-! ;� � ' ;`' = �� �� ����`/', ��°'..��
. . ; I /�/.� / �1. � ii'r� � or"- , � 1 , �� ; ` � � �
.. \\r i i � / ^�-�pA'.+'�yi�, �/` � ,
�I . ` � -" �•�I � � /�{+�'M*' �,•`��i ! `~• � , t 'i
� �' / . <���{r- f3 f � . 1� -I t:
1 / /� � � � � 5 ��.` / � v � ; '�'�
� J , / � � .-�_ ,:� F: � � i -A �� ` j � � �; � � �;
� � :.:r ��v) �� � 's I� �
. . �i - i .. � , .
, � � � t ;+L�y '1j ,`'��\ � ` �. ii i� '
. t�/ . "� t N . . - � � � �
t M1 / � �� �� � �1 �
� � i, , �` �, ` �9 � �� . . i / �� .
� . S � /`- ` �\ , � � , . ,< <� �
j� �--� ♦ � _ - 1 � a rr�� n � �� �- �i � i
: ' �, �� � 1•' � $ ♦ � t � � '' . ` �F � �.
- , �- � '� o� � ;, ; ` � �' i�
F ' j .�� � � � r� � � � � I �, • �
1 ` . ,,�,� �, t . " � ' �,
'i D \ , \ � � � � 1
i i ���� 1` � ��, � ' a- �\ �� � I i I I t�
� '\ �
� �
� � \ ��� i � � �� 1
� ��� � �. 1 � � ��(
,� � n � .
f � ��' \ � -\ � (� g, � � j�s�
� • � ` t � i � \ - ��3 `� �' % � .
\�� ` � l�` \ � � � � ^^
\t, �� ` . \ �i,� ���. , � i 1 . '• a,, •�� ;, �!�; �'.
�\'�� ��.1 � � . .t , \r � ' F
f,, � \ �\ ?+. ��. $ �. �, �I l F
:_.� , � �. � - . � i,� � �
,�� . � �� . ,
{ � � . \ \•. . � 1�' n ` �' \ � t - �\ �, . ; ' ' :
4 � � �` �'� '�ii ` e ` t �r, � � � � t
�` `i� V � \ � , .,. � • � ? ��., • �\ 1 � � C
t _� � ��!
w:� � ;� �t' ��� . �� � � �s s , :
! s �'9.1 � � .� . .� • ' � �i, • :
� ' • '�• i � . ' � i: R
� a 4Q �.� -��, A ,, ,.�, � ; t ; �
.
� �' �� \` ;� � �:�'� E
E � �' � � �' • ' � E
� �� ���� � �l� C
� ` � : a \ � s \� t� : c
'= � �. �,dR1 `\� t ��' �\ - • -\ \ . _ � I� � �
I
a `, � � ' r �
� \�+ \ � �' � � ". �. � ..
� \� \ ` �.. , ,' -, ` ~ s \ 1 t . , �
M � , 1 � ,
\ � � `\
y { A O � ' \ ` 1 ,� � ' . •. �� � E `
� 7 � � \ � t :
O � , 1 � � � •��.' �`„� �'_ �
a= ai Z .e {1 )
4 P. P' 0 �'� 1 r�`i !l r {� . t _
^ s : � ' �: �
»�T � I � :� r " .3 � � �s_ �
e� w:
1
^ �y �M � � � ' J � � ��j i
p �e .. � P � r I IS � '
' i :�gD �� `� '� •� • ��' I � :
a� � (� �'' � � f
: �
� � i � � �+ � _ ' ' � t
Z�-� � d ���� : � J �
� � _ ` '`� /�i• ,� l� P� `�g•*s—`��� � \1 � � . .y -- �`\.�``i , � t i � � }''„ �r
� _ a ' I' �,�, ` E
�fl; � � ``����,� � � ���. i / � f
� `�- � • : . / � ` _�R� � . ••� 1 I / ' � ' �„`L` } I L..ar+�
� ��\ 1 1 . �"'--"„� �� ` � ' � � I
/ �_ �r, �
� L� // ! ,l` • ��"' ��r -- _ ` ' � •
O / ' _� '? � � w
� �.�
D m / / %� \` �`�y \.,�'��\\ `�... `�'' �w ': �..' � �
p ¢ I � / � `•M.., �..,,, o•:yi w ' ; t.
O I �
_ 'V O � � / � �� "_"��:•.. - � �. :
1 � v m Z / / `� ���� `-. '1 � `"`-\
: ' � � N � ����� � �� L%
.; D Z � '� ` � •��
i D D� � / . � \,��`` �;=
'1 r � i � � (�i '� -� � /.�i `'�' ` „�
��;� m o � j� �\ '\`�,.�
z
1?!''RE�'I�ED DRAINAGE ANQ BEl�MIi� PL.AN =��0 918 i
� �,�+ '
. „� , .
i'� � '►r'11
5T I FU._A I 10(�b
7J
1. DEVELOPER TO SUPPLY TO C 1 TY TENANT TYPE AND BU I LD i NG AREA CALCULAT f ONS
PR{OR TO EACH OCCUPANCY TO MONITOR USAGE AND PARKING SUPPLY. NARKING
NEED, BY CODE. NOT TO EXCEED SI�PLY.
�, PRO�V I DE AT LEaST Of�E STALL PER �D(d SQtJARE FEET CF BtJ i LD i NG FLOOR AREA TO
MEET CODE. pLL STPLLS TO BE TEN FEET WIDE, EXCEPT HANDICAPPED TO BE 12
FEET WIDE.
3, DEVELOPER TO CANSTRUCT FACADES AS ILLUS7RATED ON ORIGINAL ElEVATIONS WIl�H
RECESSED ENTRY S, BR I CK (:ORBELL I NG CNER S I GNAGE BAND At� BR � CK COLU"1NS i N
FFtONT OF EM'R I ES AS SHGWN. ( I NCORPORATED ON REV I SED ELEVAT I ONS RECE I V ED
6/fD9/�( . )
4, Gf�AD I NG PLAN TO PRCN I DE FOR BERM l NG, AT LEAST TVJO FEET AB01lE CURB. ALONG
A1.L RI (�-IT CF WAYS, TO SCREEN PARKI NG. NROV I DE REV I SED PLAN BY �UNE 9.
1987 .( I IVCORPORATED ON REV I SED BERM i NG PI..AN RECE I VED 6/09/�3T .)
5, SHRUBBERY TO BE PLANTED AT iHE TOP AND STR�ET SIDE C� BERMS; ADQ NOTATION
TO LANDSCAPE PLAN. (INCORPORATED ON REVISED LANDSCAPE NLAN RECEIVED
6/09/8O.
6. REF l!�E �ANDSCAPE PLAN W I�fN ADD I T I ONAL SHRI�BERY AND 1 NCREASED SHRI� S i ZES
BY �UWE 9, 1987 . ( I NCORPORATED ON REV I SED LANDSCAPE I'LAN RECE I V ED
6/09/�().
(, PRW l DE F lVE - EI C�IT FOOT H I C�i SPRUCE TREES ON EXTREME SOUTHWEST CORNER
CF S I TE TO SCREEN L(aAD I NG AREA FRCM (�BORPE KCWG % ADD T� PL-ANT � NG PLAIU BY
�JNE 9, 19t37. (INCORPORATED ON REVISED LANDSCAPE F'LAN RECEIVED 6/09/8l).
t�. PROVIDE DETAILED FOUNDATION FLANTING PLANS WITH TREES AND SHRI�S TO BRF�4K
UP ARCHITECTURAL MASS BY �UNE 9, 19�7. (INCORPORATED ON KEVISED
LANDSCAPE PLAN RECEIVED 6/09/t3l).
y. PLL. C-�EEN AREAS TO HAVE AUT(�IAT I C SPR I I� I NG. ( I NCORPORATED ON FZEV I SED
LANDSCAPE PL..AN RECE I VED 6,/09/8( ).
KEN t3UREAU/ilOSEW00D
SI-' �7�9
NAGE �
7K
10. ALL DI.MPSTERS TO BE LOCATED INSIDE BUILDINGS OR IN ENCLOSED MASONRY
STRUCTURE. (INCORPORATED UN REVISED LANQSCAPE PLAN RECElVED 6/i�9/�37).
11. f'fZUN i DE FOR STEEL POSTS ADJACENT TO LOAD i NG DOORS TO PRUTECT BU! LD! I�.
12 ./�L ROC� TOP EQU I PMENT TO BE SCREENED FRCM V I EW FR(Nl R I C-�iT OF WAY S.
13 . PIZON I DE A COMPREHENS I VE S I GN PLAN BY �IJIVE 9, 1987 , i PREL I M I NARY CONCEPT
ttECE I VED 6/09/�37 . F I NAL PLAN TO BE APPROVED AFTER BU ( LD ( NG I S
CONSRUCTED,)
14. PROV I DE EV I DENCE OF ST. PAI�. WATER WORKS APPROVAL FOR ALL WORK I N
EASEJ�IENT PR I CR TO BU I LD I NG PERM I T.
15. PROV I Dt. A C(�1PREHENS I VE L I(�IT I NG PLAN BY �JNE 9, 1987 .( I NCORPORATED ON
KEVISED LANDSCAPE f�.AN RECEiVEO 6/09/87,)
16. NO ONERHEAD DOCRS FACING ANY RIGHT CF WAYS.
17. ALL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING ANO IRRIGATION TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO
OCCUPANCY CF FIRST BUJLDlNG. .
18. A PERF(�1ANCE BOND OR LETTER CF CREUIT EQUAL TO 3 PERCEN7 CF CONSTRUCTION
VP�UE TO BE SUBMITTED PRICR TO BUILDING PERMIT.
:
CITY OF FRIOLEY
PLAt{tJItJG COP1t�{ISSIOtJ P1EETIPIG, JUPIE 3, 1987
CALL TO ORUER:
Cl�airpersor� Billings called the June 3, 1987, Planning Comr�ission meeting to
order at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CI�LL :
f�1er.ibers Present: Steve Billinc�s, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek,
Don Betzold, Richard Svanda
tlernbers Absent: Fdone
Otl�ers Present: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Daryl P�lorey, Planning Assistant
Jerome & Janet Meyer, 7531 Lyric Lane P�.E.
Jim Benson, 620 tlendelssohn, Golden Valley
Randy ticPhe rson, 6a8Q Sunny sTope Dr.
��ancy P1c�Jaghten, 620 Plendelssohn, Golden Valley
Roland Benjamin, 7810 University Ave. ��.E.
Bob Schroer, 490 F:i ce Cre�k B1 vd.
See attached list
APPROVAL UF �1AY 20, 1987, PLAPd�dIIVG CO�1��ISSION MINUTES:
MUTIOt1 by t1r. Kondrick, seconded by t1r. Saba, to approve the tqay Z0, 1987,
P anning Commission minutes as written. .
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanir�ously.
1. PUBI_IC HEARIPJG: COWSIDERATIOt� OF A SPECIAL USE P€W1IT, SP #87-10, QY
JERUhi � D J fJE � EYER:
er Section ., C, 1, of the Friclley City Code to allow a.second
accessory building on Lot 15, Block 3, i1elody Tlanor 4th Addition , the
same beinq 7531 Lyric Lane tJ.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by t1r. Svanda, to open the p��blic
eF ar ng.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Ghairperson Billings declared the
public hearing open at 7:34 p.m.
P�r. Robertson stated Jim Robinson, Plannfng Coordinator,was on vacation.
He stated he would like to introduce to the Cor�ission Daryl P1orey,Planning
Assistant.
Mr. P1orey stated the request was for a second accessory building, a detached
garage, to be located in the rear yard. The property was located on Lyric
Lane between �1ad�son and 5ti� St. The property was zoned R-1, single family
residential.
. �
PLA1iiJIP1G COMFIISSIOtJ MEETIfJG, JUPIE 3, 1987 PAGE 2
P�r. Morey stated that existing on the site was a concrete driveway ��hich
leads to an existing 480 sq. ft. attached garage. There was a back door in
this garage and that provided access to the rear yard and also to the pr.oposed
garage. Presently, a concrete apron extended out the back fror� the existing
garage to the rear of the property. A hard surface extension would be necessary
to connect the existing apron to the proposed garage. This was listed as a
stipulation.
Mr. i•1orey stated there was also an existing 6 ft. high solid wood fence around
the entire back yard.
Mr. Plorey stated Staff was recommendin4 the following stipulations:
1. A fiard surface driveway be installed to the new structure.
2. Garage materials, siding, and roofing to match existing house.
3. Gara�e to be located at least 6 feet fror� the rear lot line due to a
6 foot drainage and utility easement running the length of the orooerty,
and 3 feet from the side lot line.
4. �Jo repair of vehicles other than the owner's vehicles is permitted.
5. Metal shed to be removed upon completion of garage.
6: Garage not to exceed 480 sq, ft.
�1r. f�orey stated stipulations #5 and #6 were added by Staff so that the lot
coverage would not exceed 25%.
Mr. Billings stated that at the meeting, the Commission members had received
copies of two letters, one from Mr. Frank Gams, Jr., 7517 Lyric Lane, and
Mr. Leon Mayer, 7523 Tempo Terrace, stating they vrere opposed to the construction
of a second garage at 7531 Lyric Lane.
P�OTIOf� by �1r. Kondrick, seconded by P1s. Sherek, to receive the letters fror�
��ms and t�r. Mayer.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanimously.
Ms. Janet t1eyer stated the reason they want to build the second garaqe was
because last fall they bought two cars for investment purposes. They were
able to store these cars in a pole shed at her mother's place in St. Cloud.
Her mother passed away suddenly and because the property was beinq sold, they
needed a place to store these cars by late fall. They want to build this
second garage as basically a storage shed. There would be no business there,
no repair work. The building would be idle from about Oct. 1 to April 1,
because the cars are stored during the winter and they do not move them during
that time. So, there would not be any traffic back and forth durinq those
.
• '�
PL/�PJNIfJG CO��PIISSIO�� PIEETING, JUPJE 3, 1987 PAGE 3
months. They had originally proposed a larger garage but have agreed to go
along with the square footage recommended by staff in order to stay within
the 250 lot coverage limit. There would be no noise after 10:00 p.r�. •
because that was city ordinance in a residential area.
P�s. P4eyer stated they do have a 6 ft. fence around their yard so the garage
would not be seen very easily. They have decided to go with a 2/12 pitch
or 3/12 nitch so the roof stays fairly flat and so it will not be very visible.
'�s. Meyer stated there a�ould be one entrance to their back yard and that was
through the existing garage. That was closest to the tiome of Linda Faye Dunn,
7535 Lyric Lane. �4s. Dunn has written a letter stating she had no problem
with the addition of a second garage.
P�OTIOt� by P1r. Kondrick, seconded by t�lr. Svanda, to receive the letter dated
June�, 1987, from Linda Faye Dunn, 7535 Lyric Lane, stating she had no
objection td'the' proposed garage.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanimously.
��s. Meyer stated if the Commission wanted to stipulate that the buil�iing would
be used for storage only, that would be agreeable to them.
Mr. Betzold asked how this proposed second garage a�as going to affect the
marketability of their house.
Ms. Meyer stated that was a gaod question, but they did not foresee moving
in the near future. There was not much storage in the city, and they have
seven cars to keep off the street.
��r. Betzold asked about a private storage facility to store the two cars in.
Ms. Meyer stated a private storage facility would cost about $1,000/year; and,
then, whenever they want to work on a car, they have to bring it hor�e and
then take it back.
Mr. Betzold asked what the petitioners would do if the City denied their plan.
P4s. t4eyer stated most likely they would try to get a larger shed and put that
in the back. She stated they would have liked to put the garage in the south-
west corner of the lot, because it would have been nicer to go from the
existing garage into the new garage, but there was a power line in that corner
of the lot.
P1r. Betzold asked if t1r. & ��rs. P�eyer had any problem with the stipulations.
Ms. P�eyer stated they did not.
:
PLA(dtJI�JG COt�t�ISSION MEETItJG, JUtJE 3, 1987 PAGE 4
Mr. Billings stated the application was for a special use permit in a resi-
dential area. This was an acceptable use of the property with a special use
permit. What grounds did the City have for denying a special use perr�it?
t�lr. Robertson stated the City Code stated: If a special use permit is granted,
conditions must be met in order to protect the nublic hea�th, safety, and
general welfare."
Mr. ��orey stated in a memo several years ago about special use pernits,
P1r. Virgil Herrick, City Attorney, stated: "A denial would be arbitrary if
it was established that all the standards specified by the ordinance and the
conditions for granting the permit have been met."
Mr. Saba asked what so much hard surface area in the back yard was qoinQ to
do with drainage. tJill it cause some vrater problems for the neighbors? Ne
was concerned about this much hard surface driveway and if there was a heavy
rain or a winter melt, where was that water going to go?
P�r. Robertson stated he believed the soil was quite sandy and drained well,
but maybe the petitioner could address this concern.
Mr. Jerome Meyer stated their property was the highest ooint. The front yard
dxained to the street, and the back was fairly flat, and everyone else's ya•rds
sloped to the back fence. The home directly behind them was higher than them:
He stated he has never had water standing in his backyard.
Mr. Saba stated he questioned the wisdom of so much hard surface area in the
back yard, and maybe there should not be a stipulation requiring a hard surface
driveway to the new structure (stipulation #1).
Ms. Sherek stated with the hard surface areas, it came to over 50% lot coverage
with the buildings. She would agree with �1r. Saba that they not be rec�uired
to hard surface the driveway to the new structure, and she would like to see
a stipulation that the garage would tr�-t�ed for storage only.
Mr. Saba stated if the new garage was going to be used as a garage and they
were going to move vehicles in and out of there constantly, then the hard
surface was the way to go; but since it was really going to be used for a
storage facility, then there was no need for so much hard surface.
Mr. Kondrick asked if there was any way to have the power line moved from
the south to the north side of the yard or underground. He felt it would be
much nicer,if it was not too expensive, to put that garage behind the existing
garage. There was already a nice concrete slab from the existing garage.
�1s. Meyer stated that was an option they had thought about, but with the
power line, they did not think they could put the�garage there. They had not
contacted NSP to see if it was possible to move the power line or how expensive
it would be. She stated it would be fine if they did not have to put in more
hard surface area. lJhatever goes in the garage will be there from Oct. to
May anyway.
E=�
PLA�1NI�dG COM�4ISSION MEETI�lG, JUtJE 3, 1987 PA�E 5
Ms. Judy Zimmerman, 7518 Tempo Terrace, stated they own the property in the
back of the Meyer's lot. She stated they spend a lot of time in their
backyard, and she felt this second garage would be an eyesore to them. "She
felt it would depreciate their property value. She felt there would be noise
back there. She stated they have lived in their home for 19 years. It is
a very nice residential neighborhood. She felt this building would make the
property look more like commercial property than residential property. The
existing plan left very little backyard.
Ms. Zimmerman asked if the stipulations recommended by Staff ►�ould also be
in affect fo r ner•� owners of the property some day if the special use permit was
approved.
Mr. Robertson stated the stipulations were a repeat of the zoning ordinance, sa
the stipulations would run with the property.
Mr. Billings asked if repair work or any other kind of occupation would be
allowed in the garage.
Mr. Robertson stated home occupations were only allowed within the living part
of the structure, not in accessory buildings.
Ms. Zir�nnerman stated she had contacted 26 people within the surroundinq
immediate area 200 ft. from the peti�ioner's home. She had a petition signed
by 25 of the 26 people, and she also had letters from some of these people
with reasons for not wanting the second garage.
Mr. Billings read the petition which stated those who signed the petition
were opposed to the special use permit.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by t4s. Sherek, to receive Petition No.2-1gg�•
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanimously. �
Ms. Zirr�nerman stated P4e�ody Manor was a very nice area, and another thing they
thought about was that it would set a precedent for others to build second
garages or other storage buildings in their backyards. With an existinq slab
already and then another driveway to a new gar.age would leave little yard
1 eft.
Mr. Billings stated that the suggestion had been made that the garage be
moved to the north side of the lot where the concrete slab was. He asked
Ms. Zir�merman if that would lessen the "eyesore" effect. The garage would
also be there to buffer some of the sound.
Ms. Zimmerman stated that if they added onto the back of the garage, she
could understand that more--if it was part of the existing structure which
would at least look pleasant, but she did not think a separate building would
add to the value of the property.
:
PLA(�NI�JG C�Mt1ISSI0N MEETIfJG, JUPJE 3, 1987 PAGE 6
Mr. Billings asked P1r. P�eyer if he had explored the possibility of having
the garage up closer to the existing garage.
��1r. Meyer stated that if the garage was put there, it would be too close
to their addition. It a�ould be only about 6 ft. between the garage and
the addition. They have sliding patio doors that go out onto the concrete
slab.
P�r. Ronald Klayda, 7522 Tempo Terrace, stated he has lived in his home for
19 years. About 8-10 ft. of their property was on the southeast corner of
t�ie Meyer's property. The property lines did not line up on the opposite side
of the block. He stated he was opposed to the construction of a second build-
ing because he felt it would create a more crowded effect that would affect
the property evaluation in the area. Historically, when the builder of this
area started building, the propert� owners were told they had to limit the
size of their houses to fit the size of the properties. He stated they dici
adi�ere to that, lJhen they moved in, they had a two car garage. lJhen the
�1eyer's moved in, their first garage was a single garage, then they expanded
he believed with a special use permit, to a double garage. Since then, the
f�eyer's have also added to the back of the 6ouse. They put the garage door
in the back of the garage and put in the concrete slab.
f1r. Kloyda stated it was his concern that he �could see the possibility of the
second garage being used for the storage of not only the two cars, but also
the materials used in the Pleyer's craft business. Whether this would happen
or whether it was even permissible under city code, he did not know, but
it was his concern.
Mr. Kloyda stated right now there are ta�o automobiles, but would there be even
more automobiles in the future? t�ould this garage he used as a part of an
automobile restoration project that would become a separate business?
Mr. Kloyda stated his primary concern, however, was the effect this would
have on the property valuation, that this second garage would limit the resale
value of not only the Meyer's property, but also his own property.
Ms. Meyer stated they have lived in their home for 19 years also. When they
originally moved into the house, there was no garage because they aouldn't
afford it. They got an easement in order to put in a single car garage one
year after they moved in. They put the addition on two years ago and put on
alumnimum siding so the garage and the house matched. This second storage
garage �could not be used for the storage of her craft supplies because she
does wood craft work. It was a hobby. She works with the Children's Hospital
and other charity wo rk. There a�as no way in an unheated garage that she could
store this wood. Also, they could not do any type of repair that would require
electrical equipment, because there will be no electricty to the structure.
She stated she hoped this helped answer some of the concerns expressed by the
neighbors.
}
�\�
PLANNING COMPIISSION MEETI��G, JU��E 3, 1987 PAGE 7
MOTIOIJ by t1s. Sherek, seconded by t4r. Kondrick, to close the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the pu6lic
hearing closed at 8:12 p.m.
Mr. Kondrick stated he felt if many of the people who had signed the petition
had come to the meeting to learn about the building and what would be done
with the building, it might have helped eliminate some of their fears and
concerns. He felt the major concern was that the building would be used as
a business, and that was not allowable by code. In all honesty, he would
rather see the garage moved to the north si�1e. he stated he really had no
problem with the building, especially with a 6 ft. high fence surroundinq
the backyard.
Mr. Svanda stated he was not be too crazy about the garage in the proposed
location either, but it seemed the Planning CoMmission had no choice but to
approve the special use permit with the stipulations based on the reading of
the ordinance and the legal opinion by the City Attorney.
Mr. Saba stated he ciefinitely felt the stipulation about the hard surface
driveway should be deleted. The size of the structure was reduced sonsiderably
from the original proposal. He agreed if there was any way the structure
could be moved to the other corner of the lot, it would be more aesthetically
pleasing. He would recommend they add a stipulation that the structure be
used for storage only.
Mr. Betzold stated there were a number of things about this oroposal that
bothered him. There were a lot of neighbors who signed a petition saying
they were opposed to the second garage, but yet, for whatever reason, only
a few had come to the meeting. He had heard a common complaint that this
garage would be used for a business, but obviously it could not. However, he
could not really say that all the neighborhood opposition would have dissi-
pated if all the neighbors had been at the meeting.
Mr. Betzold stated obviously the petitioners were engaged in a hobby that
was quite expensive--trying to maintain a couple of classic automobiles.
Yet, they were complaining about the expense of storinq the cars somewhere
else. But, that was the nature of having 7 cars, 2 of which were classic.
He felt the best plan would be to expand the existing garage, even though
that was not the proposal before the Planning Commission. He stated he could
not go along with the plan as proposed.
Ms. Sherek stated that in looking at the yard and the plan, her first choice
would have been to check with NSP to see about burying the power line and
putting the new garage in line with the existing garage. It was going to be
costly anyway to put the garage in the proposed location, and another $300-
500 to bury the power line was not really that outrageous. The concern by
the neighbors that the garage would be used for a business, if that should
happen, the neighbors have a legitimate complaint, but there ►ras also a
legitimate remedy.
:
PLAPdNIfsG COP�P�ISSION MEETIPJG, JU�JE 3, 1987 PAGE �3
i1s. Sherek stated she did not see that the Planning �ommission had any
grounds for denying the special use permit, but she really felt the option
of pu�ting the new garage in line with the existing garage should be exolored.
She stated the petitioner was asking for something extraordinary, and if they
meant they have to move their patio door, then they migi�t have to do that.
Mr. Billings stated the petitioner was covering a lot of ground on this lot
with structure and driveways. This was a fairly well designed neighborhood,
and they were adding a lot of garage and concrete that ►vas going to create
the ratio of green space to lot size on this lot to be considerably smaller
than ttiat on most, if not all, of the ather lots in the neighborhood. He
would question whether or not they did have the grounds to deny the special
use permit because of what the ordinance said. He would also encourage the
netitioner to explore the passibility of underg m und electrical and moving
the garage to the other side of the lot and/or closer to the house prior to
the City Council meeting.
��Ir. Billings stated if the Planning Commission does recommend apnroval to
the City Coui�cil, he would like to see a stipulation that the garage would
be used for storage of t�ie automobiles and related yard equipment only. He
would like to see a stipulation about not paving the area between the exist-
ing slab and the new garage--that the area not be paved at this ti�e, but that
the stipulation be reviewed in one year and if there are ruts or tracks in
the area in the summertime, then maybe some consideration could be given to
paving in the future.
Mr. Billings stated he would vote against approval of the special use nermit.
He felt the term "general welfare" was a pretty ambiguous term, and in terms
of the development itself and the nature and character of the neighborhood, he
did not think this much concrete, blacktop, and garages was in keeping with
the character of the neighborhood. He did not feel this plan was the best
plan for the site or for the neighborhood.
Mr. Svanda stated that after hearing the reasons P1r. Billings had cited
for den�al of the special use permit, he agreed with Mr. Billings and stated
he, too, would vote against a motion to approve the special use permit.
MOTION by Mr. Betzold, seconded by t1s. Sherek, to recommend to City Council
e3�n� of Special Use Permit, SP #87-10, by Jerome and Janet Meyer, per
Section 205.07.1, C, 1, of the Fridley City Code to allow a second accessory
building on Lot 15, tilock 3, Melody Planor 4th Addition, the same being
7531 Lyric Lane N.E.
Upon a voice vote, Billings, Betzold, Sherek, Svanda, Saba voting aye,
Kondrick voting nay, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried by a
vote of 5-1.
Mr. Betzold stated this recommendation was based on the proposed plan by
the petitioner. The City Council could take whatever action they felt
appropriate, or the City Council could refer it back to the Planning Commission
if the petitioner were to change or modify the plan.
Mr. Billings stated this would go to City Council on June 15.
:
PLAPJNI�JG COP�MISSION MEETIt�G, JUPJE 3, 1987 PAGE 9
2. PUBLIC HEARING: COt�SIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERS4IT, SP #81-11, BY
J. BENSO� . 6 B � .
Per Section 205. 5. , C, 4, of the Fridley City Code to allow a repair
garage on Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same
being 7710 University Avenue N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Svanda, to open the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the public
hearing open at 8:35 p.m.
P�r. Robertson stated this �ras a very complex case. The next three items
were inter-related. He stated the first action was for a special use permit
for a repair garage along University Ave. on the west side, north of Osborne
Road. The property was zoned C-3, heavy industrial. A repair garage was
a use allowed in C-3 only with a special use permit. In connection with this,
agenda item #3 �vas for a lot split which was part of a split and a recombina-
tion of existing parcels in order to get sufficient lot size for the auto
repair facility (item #2).
Mr. Robertson stated item #4 on the agenda was a vacation of two existing
easements: (1) a 20 ft. drainage and utility easement; and (2) 1/2 of a 30 ft.
street and utility easement. This must be done because the existing sewer
line would have to be relocated which runs currently along the rear property
line to a point west of it. (Item #2)
��r. Robertson stated he met with one of the petitioners, �4r. Jim Benson,
and there were two issues Staff felt should be brought to the attention of
the Planning Comm�ssion: (1) the fact that there is no record of an easer►ent or
dedicatinn for a road connectino to Ranchers Road, although it was the petitioner's
undPrst�n�'�ng.that they do exist. The lack of this piece �NOUId make access to these
pawc2�s �,i.ffiiCUi�* 9f not impossible, thereby inadvertently creating land-
locked parcel which was not in the best interest of the owner o� the City.
(2) the position of the piece of property,that was left to the north--an
awkward left-over parcel which might, in fact, be of little value to anyone
unless the petitioner has some kind of development plan or staging plan
that addressed the ultimate development of that �iece.
f1r. Benson stated he was the developer working with the company, ABRA,
who will be building the building.
Mr. Benson stated that currently none of the property, Lot A and Lot B, was
landlocked because it was all owned by Bob Schroer. The piece of land that
P�r. Robertson had referred to was now owned by ��r. Schroer. So, today what
they were talking about was putting the new repair facility on the eastern
part of Lot C and Lot D and the balance of the property was owned by Mr. Schroer.
The questionable piece was the �brthern part of Lot A, and they do not want to
��e� T-t� beeflme �andl ocked.
Mr. Robertson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations:
:
PLANPJIPJG COMP1ISSIOP� MEETING, JUNE 3, 1987 PAGE 10
' 1. No outside storage of damaged vehicles or any parts or equipment allowed.
2. Provide proof of permits from Anoka County to handle hazardaus wastes.
3. Eliminate one overhead door on the east side of the building.
4. All overhead doors and man doors to be tan colored to match buildYng.
5. Supply building facade material samples for staff approval prior to
permitting.
6. Provide additional evergreen screening of overhead door areas. To be
incorporated on landscape plan by 6/29/87.
7. All green areas to have automatic sprinkling.
8. Provide concrete curbing 5 foot setback off building where no overhead
doors are planned.
9. Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment. flown
draft.filtration system or better required.
10. Dumpster to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure compatible with
structure. .
11. All roof to p equipment to be screened from view.
Mr. Benson stated Randy McPherson who was Presir�ent of ABRA and
Roland Benjamin who owned tJorthtown Nissan and who was also part of the
project were in the audience.
Mr. Benson stated they have a problem with stipulation #3 regarding the
elimination of the one overhead door on the east side of thE building. He
stated ABRA was a national franchise. This would be their national proto-
type building. Alot of thought has gone into the building,• and they have
worked with the City in terms of the materials for the� building. He stated
ASRA was in the autobody refinishing business, and their whole concept was
to take the auto body refinishing business from the "back yard" type business
into a first-class customer-oriented type of business. They are currently
located on 81st and University. He stated the flow of the business was such
that the cars go in one door and then the finished product comes out the
other door. He stated these doors are in the fron� of -the bufl�iing, but
they are not sitting open for the public to see. That second daor was only
open to take the car out of the facility and then it was closed again, because
that was a critical area when the cars come'out of the paint room. This door
was also a second exit for cars that are being h�-�d for repair inside during
inclement weather. �
Mr. Benson stated eliminating either one of the doors alrast rendered the
entire building unuseable. They have tried to mitigate the impact of the
:
PLANNIPJG COMP�ISSI0�1 MEETI�JG, JUP�E 3, 1987 PAGE 11
doors in front. The doors were only 10 ft. by 10 ft. 7he striping of the
material and the combination of bricks and the design will go straight
through the doors. He believed the doors as they were situated with the
landscaping as proposed for the front of the building and the fact that these
doors are opened very seldom would make these doors less visible to the
public.
Mr. Robertson stated with the upgrading of the University Avenue Corridor,
it was the City's general policy to limit any potential unsightly building
fronts. So, they are asking for the same th-ing from all developers along
University Ave, in order to enhance the appearance of University Ave.
f�lr. Benson stated they would have no problem wlth putting heavier landscaping
with evergreens in front of the overhead doors.
Mr. Benson stated they also had a problem wtth stipulation #9 regarding the
requirement of a down draft filtration system or better. He stated he would
let Mr. I�cPherson describe their equipment.
Mr. McPherson stated they do not incorporate down drafts, but use a"cross
flow" and it was all OSNA approved, Everything they do is OSHA approved.
They just had OSHA th m ugh their present building in.Fridley about six months
ago, and everything was checked.
Mr. Billings stated maybe stipulation #9 could be changed to read: "Provide
plans and specifications for o�or mitigation equipment. Oraft filtration
system to be approved by Staff."
Mr. McPherson stated he believed as strongly as the City that this should be
a good looking building. They are really trying to set the standard for this
type of industry. This plan will be their national role model. He wanted to
bring people f rom all over the country to see what they have done here in
Fr�dley. He hoped in a couple of years to build a corporate facility and
training facility in Fridley, so they plan to stay in Fridley and be good
neighbors. The one big problem was they could not eliminate the one over-
head door. If he could do anything about it, he would. One reason they have
the doors to the south was because of the restaurant to the north. He did
not think people using the restaurant should have to see cars coming in and
out.
MOTION BY Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing,
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the public
hearing closed at 9:10 p.m.
MOTION by P�r. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend to City Councll
ap�roval of Special Use Permit, SP #87-11, by J. Benson and G. Bradbury, per
Section 205.15.1, C, 4, of the Fridley City Code to allow a repair garage on
Lot 4, 81ock 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same being 7710
University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations:
:
PLANNIIJG CUt�MISSION P�IEETING, JUP�E 3, 1987 PAGE 12
1, rb outside storage of damaged vehicles or any parts or
equipment allowed.
2. Prnvide proof of permits from Anoka County to handle -
hazardous waste.
3. All overhead doors and man doors to match building.
4. Supply building facade material samples for Staff approval
prior to permitting.
5. Provide additional evergreen screening of overhead door areas.
To be incorporated on landscape plan by 6/29/87.
6. All green areas to have automatic sprinkling.
7. Provide concrete curbing 5 foot setback off building where
no overhead doors are planned.
8. Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment.
Draft filtration equipment system to be approved by Staff.
9. Dumpster to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure
compatible with structure.
10. All roof top equipment to be screened from view.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the
motion carried unanimously.
3. COPaSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #87-04, BY J. BENSON AND G. BRADBURY:
Sp it off parts o ot an , B oc , East Ranc Estates n Ad ition,
to create three parcels to be added to existing tax parcels, generally
located at 7710 University Avenue t�.E.
Mr. Robertson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations:
1. Parcels A and B to be added to Lot 1, Block 1, East Ranch Estates
First Addition to preclude landlocking remaining vacant property.
2. Parcel C to be combined with Parcel D for new development and
recorded with lot split.
3. Any further subdivisions of vacant property to require a replat of
the area.
4. Legals for lot split, L.S. #87-04, subject to County approval; if not
approved, a plat will be required as per County direction.
5. A park fee of approximately $2,841 to be paid prior to recording
split. Exact amount equal to square footage X.023.
Mr. Benson stated they did not have any problems with the stipulations.
�
:
PLAPlNItJG COMP�IISSION MEETIP�G, JUNE 3, 1987 PAGE 13
t�OTIOPJ by Mr. Kondri ck, seconded by �4r. Saba, to recommend to Ci ty Counci 1
approval of Lot Split, LS �87-04, by J. Benson and G. Bradbury, to split
off parts of Lot 3 and 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition, to �
create three parcels to be added to existing tax parcels, generally located
at 7710 University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations:
1. Parcels A and B to be added to Lot 1, Block 1, East Ranch
Estates First Addition to preclude landlocking remaining
vacant property.
2. Parcel C to be combined with Parcel D for new development and
recorded with lot split.
3. Any further subdivisions of vacant property to require a replat
of the area.
4. Legals for Lot Split, L.S. #87-04, subject to County approval; if
not approved, a plat will be required as per County direction.
5. A park fee of approx. �2,841 to be paid prior to recording
split. Exact amount equal to square footage X.023.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanirnously.
4. COt�SIDERATION OF A VACATION, SAV #87-04, BY J. BENSON AND 6. BRADBURY:
o vacate easements on ot , oc , ast anc states, econ ition,
described as follows: (1) a 20 foot drainage and utility easement over the
West 20 feet of the East 183 feet of the North 160 feet and (2) the East
half of the 30 foot street and utility easement lying west of the East 200
feet of the fdorth 160 feet, generally located at 7710 University Avenue N.E.
Mr. Robertson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations:
1. Developer responsible for all costs associated with relocation of
8 inch sanitary sewer line.
2. New utility easements to be provided on north and south�a'f property
to accorrmodate relocation of sewer line.
Mr. Billings stated one thing that did not appear to be consistent was.
Mr. Benson's statement earlier that the street was previously vacated.
Mr. Benson stated he believed the street was vacated, but the easer�ent was
retained for utilities.
P�r. Billings stated one of his concerns was that if there is a street ease-
ment there, that they are not doing something that was going to create
problems in the future. Since ��1r. Schroer owned all of the other property and
this was phase 1 of a long range development, he did not think the City had
to worry too much about a street that would only service Mr. Schroe r's
property.
Mr. Robertson stated Staff would continue to research the accuracy of this
street easement before the City Council meeting.
� �
PLANfJI�JG COMMISSION MEETI�dG, JUNE 3, 1987 PAGE 14
Mr. Billings stated that in the vacation description it said, "a 20 foot
drainage and utility easement over the West 20 feet of the East 183 feet",
so that was a strip 20 ft. wide between 163 and 183. Then there was "ttie
east half of the 30 ft. street and utility easement lying west of the East
200 feet", so that was from 200 to 230 ft., so one was not on top of the
other according to the description. It might be a concern but was something
that should probably be researched by Staff.
MOTION by P�r. Saba, seconded by P4s. Sherek, to recommend to City Council
approval of Vacation, SAV #87-04, By J. Benson and G. Bradbury, to vacate
easements on Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, described
as follows: (1) a 20 foot drainage and utility easement over the West 20
feet of the East 183 feet of the North 160 feet and (2) the east half of
the 30 foot street and utility easement lying west of the East 200 feet of
the fJortti 160 feet, general ly located at 7710 Uni versi ty Avenue tJ. E. , wi th
the fol�lowing stipulations:
1. Ueveloper responsible for all costs associated with relocation
of 8 inch sanitary sewer line.
2. New utility easements to be provided on north and south of
property to accommodate relocation of sewer line.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion
carried unanimously.
5. RECEIVE hiAY 26, 1987, APPEALS COMMISSION MIPiUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Betzo?d, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the May 26, 1987,
ppea s CommTSSion minutes.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson_Billings declared the motion
carried unanimously.
6. OTHER BUSINESS:
Reminder: June 17th meeting changed to June 24th, 7:30 p.m.
ADJOURf�MENT :
MOTIOPJ by Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a
voice vote, all � ting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the June 3, 1987,
Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Res ectfully sub itted,
,
L �
�
ynr� a a
Recording Secretary
�,
, ,; .
� �� / _�� `' �!._.�ti�.i
,,'
+ ,, ,i�_ ��
�✓
i� '
���'�yviti�^r ;���'..��'�—��--
_. � � �/
.y', i ���
1 .� / r � _,- �
, ;�_ __ — _ —
i,� - � ��
1 �'1 � � �
� � ��� .. " - �i '-
'' 4� % ' k . J
( � � t� "�_ J - � � L. ✓/� _ - � �.
' ,. E� ' %��i c �
i: � � /-
� �: �1 y.` , J� � �, � �,, , _ � � (� '� 5..,:`vY����J��, �(JI �� �
%
, �i.�," ,%��� ;�Il.�>c��l./ % �.;'; '' ��.�'e.r. >, �-��,��./ 'i, �:
. '.� � / - . � /_ �
�.
\' 'y , � •-n G t� �\��i_C, Ut-..\i'i:.+1 t\ - ' \, '
� � �\�.�... �\�-,.,�`. ��-1. ' ..i� ,
��
) � / " _' �/���
� � i ` ��- � `�` � � / :� J � �� ' t � ="c r-"r C
. i � _ . ,
„ �;
. j, l ? ; ,
�l
� �_��, �' ; /%.�,C��� �, 1�
�
�. .
,� i � /�
;, , .
� -- ; . �� , -,�— ,
, `"/'c';"+� /'� y �� %'
�� , .� � i, s -� ' � � � t � l
j3!J�� �! `�� � .
` 1 . , �' � -� :,�,��� _%„�.- ��= ,��_�_ --� ;� � _" ���- �� �' � � -� �� �. _-
��
_,
, �
:
�
r 1 � ��.
/ L L � ., � �
�� ��� - ;��
� ' -
� ' �%YL�i'Z�. �...�i�/l�r—i�
� j j<�;= �
,
: •
. � %� // ''/ ,�, � �,r��a/�i��Gf�/�/ ,
� i; ' � —�---- j �---y' /
�� -� �. � � rl� .� ��:�� � ����
���� ., � � ��
� ���, � `. - _ � � , � ,
__
i c x,�r� 7 � / �' � � ���, T��:t-�-c-� �� �..�.�- � �-`'%
%�� �1�� - y �' `'� "` ,,%/
' 1 � -����� -� .`
�`���7G�! / �`,�I:,'J7�Ll/ri�"l'1�.� %J`✓�� ���. �,pL �%'�. .. "�itG`ZZ��//
r �
4. _ �
, �, , -. -r
i= • [ � L_ , - � �. _
�� � �� `�, jJl ` , � .
�.;�� ,_� c_ 5 �G �,,��o .c_t_ .,� �� _ •�����c•._ti.�_ r____
� ' l
� .,G-� � / /--�� � � 1 � � � ��'zr .��� J
'�,% � � ���
�y` � � 7�H � � i�
�;�,� /�;'�r��� � �S y � � / ' ��� l�J� E-• ;`�, `��� �
_
�
CITY Of
FRl DLEY
��+ • •
CO�ItMUNITY DEVEL4PMENT'
DEPARTIV�ENT
�- M EMO R.AN D UM
J� g��n, Co�nity Develognent Director and
Jim imbins�n, Planning Coordinator
I�+D FURM: Daryl Irbrey. Plaru�in9 Assistant�
!�',ND L�TE: J�►e 10, 1987
�ING: SP #87-10 by Jerome and Janet !leyear, 7531 Iyric Lane.
On June 3, the Planning Commission reoommenc]ed denial of S�ecial Use Permit,
SP �87-10, by Jerane and �Tanet Meyer to allaw a second acc�el s�e�n edlby the
The rewmmendation for denial was based on the proposed pl p
petitioner. The Planning Commission felt that the propose�d on theelotca�o�n
on that plan o�nsiderably reduoed the aQnow�t � qreen sg3
directed the petitioners to explore the option of locating the proposed
garaqe in line with the existinq c�araqe on the existing ooncrete slab at the
rear of the lot before the June 15 City Qouncil meeting.
The N�eyers have sutrnitted a new plan with the proposed qarage in the location
suggested b� the Planning Commission. This option would not considerably
reduce the amount of green spaoe on the lot. �wever, a one foot wide strip
of concrete would have to be adc3ed to the existing ooncrete in order for the
proposed c�arac�e to be located off of a six foot drainage and utility easement
that ri.ms along the enti re rear lot 1 ine and 20 feet in f rom the rea r on the
east side. For the garage to be located here� the power lir�e that presently
r�s across the rear of the lot would have to clear the roof peak by at least
three feet or be relocated �derqround. The petitioner inf romed me todav
that they plan to burY this cable.
If rhe City Gouncil approves this request with the new garage location, staff
reoomQnends the stipulations that are attached.
Attachment
Nr87-134
�
� 2 SP #87-10 8 Q
a�'.� I Jerome & Janet Meyer
--�-- ....-` ,
. ; N //� CORNER
�' --��_1 S�"C. ( // – —
,,,.,,Xf . --- – _ _
- ,r, s _ ..,�. . _
„, ,,�; T LIMITS OF �� ,- - - .. _ .- _ _ /�l%Q /
1 �� CORPORA E �=�-� _ � ,
� � 2 y ��`' � CITY OF FRIDLEY ;. � �
,
. (s'e) � �s7) N :�; s
4 3 �" i ,; , iu�-,r„ . ,,. ,
O y ,..
M , .y�:.o: . � �
,� ' l N ,.., ` I � � ,.. .� �/ n
� � � ► ; �ri
,. , �
.
, � I i � � 4�� �
- �,� �2 4; .,�, =�-� ; ,
,s;',, � �b) >; � I :
� " .,/,D { � �// _ ,�;. _ . ' .y: � � ' �
' � ',� % i �� � I
�-�/'�i�'��f s�;,.,.� t � ` s�•�•., . r _.
� !'11��' b I r
� /1 / I
II �Iv � ! I � 1-1 �DD
4 � � �
� � . �r_S L 1.9� .�.-,,,�w' � � . I
,� 1� ,, • ,; . .,. � .,�� �, , �t�>
;�� (2402) � i � ,�
:�,� , - . " ��''° '� I `
�� i Q i�'� s . �,
`' .. .; ,.., (6�1 ' � �,,.,�
� , � � .::�
� —' _ ` ,sc, -„ - <- ^�° � I
�'i I , �, I _.,�:',�'o�tr,�r i , � �
v�f
_�J �;
. ' .,.. ��
(240rJ
- � =�-- —�'
:� ^
( �;
� ��� �.tic
;j � .
' ,. , •.
_ ���
��
' `�� i�)
f �� 26 �
_ ,�
i� � . �
�� ,�
,:�
t� MI � L j
Yti L Q � �
f �
� �
1 l�}7/ �
� �,j ' � :�� y1
Y �� ,
�
^i)�, 3f:- � �
. �-� � \ . ...
, � !r r..
(G) a
� �' , ; i' ,CB> � �� ` , Y
� 5 �
J' �. � ' �' �i% �
; %� ';r� o (�0) '�d /0 9 �+ �r.
y:� .
� s '
d? a ` (rq �f tif s� ' �
� �..9�' ,
e' t.,. , `y '•+' (�j) o l2 ���` �sBS.� �i ; 1s)
�/e " , )s I3 ,F /Rj 1 , t. b` •
; , �r ��� = 35 , 3 a . ,+.
` �: . .`;a) ' o � o _�+� � �s' (�e) °. 34 ,�,,..% ' � u
�� � ":�. 5� � lJ� f� `'„� �w �i� a.3.� t � �t.,./'J �a �
;
�
R
S
\�' I
�
�
�
�
,
�
�
�.
l�
.�
.�
d'O
�
G TL�� dYA•�`P�L� �
t�.�.l:}•� Aa�,�,,v.�'
•-, g' %�,S' $,
,
0
1 y
� ao���
..�.
�r
! Mlly^%�U
I�w '{ a �
� {
E-�:� >
�►. X �
� 2!,�! �Gt. tit
�
.� - - �c,�d �,�.e. �.. 8 R
,� . -� � :, �
����_ " _ �..�, Q'�u..G�:.
,�- �79 -� � 3^ �,(��cs- � .��.�.
_ _ _ _ � ._. — (.e�t� C.�c. �'o-
t.� i� � -�-�f(..0-c.ccR. -9-c�vG2
.
�� c�,�_
_ �
. �.'��
� ���..�,�,�� , .
� T
� �
'�'c • `�/
1 F �'�'� � ,,,,,
. ^
�
'O
,�
� ` � �- a � -� �
� ,
' E- 9 � ;
n
�
�
�
�
�i
�I°.-�.�,Q.�� � �
�
�
,��
F � 3-� r__� a 3 -� I �,
�
�
��
�r�>d _ l
�1:� ,�t '� � a y � - -� o — �„ ,�
� �` �� — � L� �
I��
�•�,���� ' � �NS �-l�a� .� G -q��o,
, �`w`� � -"�.� � �-�'� .
�'-�,�"�'-`'` , �� ,���� -��:�1�� �-;.�,�.�-��.�,,,
Q� ct-�..�.� ����� ��� �
- U (T ~ / , ,��/'�, .,c�. —��-�
•• n Q !� % �' � [/.
t.� .e�f"�C%���r°''� .,,;►-G� � 9
� � � �
� %�C�.G� � �c. ,v,� ,��.c�
Q;ue�sa � .�� �e ..co ���i�v 9'� <���
�� � �
�l �� ..
�__Y�____�._.___________ __ _ __
__ __ ___.--
--- ^....._.......�.�...._..___..�___-- _... . . .. �
:
' ,�: ►
�RChE /�NND JP�ET NEYER
ST I PI�.AT IONS
1. GARAGE SIDING AND ROOFIt�G TO MATCH EXISTING HGUSE.
2, GARAGE TO BE LOCATED AT LEAST SIX FEET FRCM THE REAR AND SIDE L OT LINES
DUE TO THE PRESENCE GF A SIX FOOT DRAINAGE At� UTILITY EASEl�1ENT-
3• REPA I R OF VEH I CLES OTHER THAN THE OWNER' S VEH I CLES AND AUTO�+IOB I LE
RESTGRATlON ARE NOT PERMITTED
4. GARAGE TO BE USED FOR STC�RAC� OF AUTCMOBILES AND YARD EQUIPNIENT Of�LY.
5. N�TAL STORAC�. SHED TO BE RE1Yi0VED UPON CCMPLETION OF GARAGE-
6. C�RAGE NOT TO EXCEED 48� SQUARE FEET. THESE LAST TWO STIFULATIUNS ARE
ADDED SO THAT LOT COVERAC� WILL NOT EXCEED 25 PERCENT-
__ _ � _ ' . "� O � �e � �
��J � `� � ` . � � � V ` 4 C
4 '
��r or � � b,�,,e � #
� +B9L J>h I 111;f 14i99
.� !/�•' ,✓//. -!/ � � IY �� .
♦ ,f�' �
a al r� 794� �� ���1 ,
6 � Z, � I ��^. 7 �13� � � a i/�� ,S : •° � $r ''� , �
�` 6 �� ��3� �' �:� •r
; ,��`11,,r i � 79z0 � 03� � ° '��+ :
�i0 .:' ( �te �� _ ��oo ee +15 A{ y �.�'fs'� '�
i �� � t �., ,rs��:.,
Z ` � 'S
e ." � �
� � 9zz �,, , ' `
� � ,a� � C� :'
����o� \� I� B �s�� � � � �ln 6 , � ti.�,►� , �, 2 � �
�/' /�KI CRNA� A1f✓C/�flS t � •' �� !
+� �vD.i�. I I 'h'6I �' J� �� ��� � {� , � � ���ti % 91 D
e �
. L — ; y --�. . /I�.jJ
: -1 �'Af i //If7 � 1�,� �' .
•u'7,c fAJl� �� J /1�7/�f,�E ti� � ��{• .�.�OJ�
� � � f �� . / Oe... . _
♦ `
�, ` ' i� � � .'�Sf ' � .-..
p L �, ; �. a ,,1-s. � .ii �aTr1 , e = c .o � e7
a,9 ° d �� a �9 � ti� -s. v�r �e
_, � �RS , 8ap _� j �Z� � � ,�.�r 7 8to
7 �yo) � a l�i�
{ 7895 7920 -TSeb .�; � e
rz �
�� �1� � (¢) ' � z / �i ��'' �-
� d � � �; -, a��i� � -- - -
,
� � t9f) � � ,� ..
1 .fNrr/'Nw.wTrs • �
w.ii✓ � '�e+. a
,.v•� '
�oe . .q�. �s.
.,Y! t lbw'� A/J'f,7JYAr �
7 8 3 � '.- . "'9� e
a
' 1 �i
� � � � i'. � Z a 1
: 8
�! y, ° I /f) % „ � � /3� . . „ . I
C . � '� .
,� 1�� N �„> "' � IO 78�� =�,
� � � �d6S ( � ^ :
� O � �t�
E A A _:�_- ,
^ e�
' o' '.:• ,a: � • ,:
� +" � ,r
� �
a o
� d a�
, � k � I y � ' v�
\ ,`
CJ 1� � ti
t, V � 9 _. pO _. �
'' $ � g � � (y) I 7�3
�� n � M h � �.
� GC� � � , � � ,(�)
.'� ���3 � Q � y
779s � I � � . �
Ia �„ � yo< � �' � av
i e w "� ! � v. B.� - ... 2.•
� ��� � i % � � �
0 3 `r:) 1 , � � srJ(!) ,;
�,or -�� ��oz , >>a3 ,
ti � ..
r (e) $ � s' 8 - _ "�. e�
. <�) � ; 7�00
_ � ��a3 � � �.�s� (�) .
Fy e � f��� a �•
A ;. f /, � 1�' � �; `Q �� �.i i� �4S
� � �~ /� �T
i 3' °
t"°''� tse'
- • / 4>-r- •-
.Y�Y!'lbN.' �Si �......w,.wru
' �RNER
I�
33
� ; � �� -»c
: id (
n /f� t.
W � RC
V,-�. ,..
� � : .
. � � q 9(
� � W . r.
v� _.
j .:, �o,
: � -
w
\ ? i i �i
op � GO w
\ f a•
7! j_ '�
".... p
. .... �""��
�
r '
�
a
�o
V
u
J 1 w�J�✓
� ,
:;
�
)J
� ' �
I1 � ,'s'
, �
. ��.w-r�nw� �AAD ,�!
- - " 3niaa ����a�s�nn
� �
i � _
�
I� �
I � �•
I y
� �
�s •
b �
�
� �
4� �
� .=
� ��
�
..... ��
_ p�'°'r
� '
� �
u
<
� • �
� '.
� �
N •
O � d
O t'
f �
Y
0 �
N �
• �
O IV M M
� • Y
^, N Y Y
� •
�t O M O v
q �p N N
~ � a A A
I A p � 10 f
• • f • •
V O
r. W
.. O
t t[ �
W W � �'
K � s s
� d
U. W O
W � � _
pt .-. O
K � v � �
� � � O a[
� � Q w <
..� O J YL O.
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANF�It�G C0�1t1ISSIU(1 t-tEETI!�G, MAY 6, 1987
CALL TU OR�ER:
Ci�airperson Billings called the t1ay 6, 1987, Planning Comniss
orcler at 7:33 p.r�. �
ROLL CALL:
meetinq to
�1er�bers Present: Steve Oillings, Dave Kondrick, Bru e Bondow (for Dean Saba),
Sue Sherek, Donald Betzold
�•1eribers Absent: Ri chard Svanda
Otl�ers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Co dinator
� Jock Robertson, Conmuni Developr�Pnt Director
Joe tSaertens, 144 Ri v Edge �lay
t�ichael & Dorotl�y G tafson, 381 - 66th Ave. td.E.
Qernard Scl�olzen, 0 Fairmont St.
David J. Sinigag o, 4875 - 3rd St. tl.E.
Uick Olchefski 195 - 63'2 Way ��.E.
Sandy O1 chef i, 195 - 63'2 Way f1. E.
Donna Olso , 6430 East River Road
Qernadet Qenson, �•lidwest Super Stop
APPROVI�L OF APRIL 22,/�937,_PLA'J��I��G COt�1t1IS5I0fd MINl1TES:
�10TIOiJ by �1r, t:o ricl:, seconded by t�ir. Qetzold, to approve the April 22, 1937,
Planning Corimis ion ninutes v�ith the following ar�endment: Insert between
Items 1 and ' "Public Hearing: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP �87-05,
by ht-G Pro rties". This public ��earing �•�as originalTy scheduled for April 22, 1987,
bu� by t petitioner's request (»ho was not present at the April 22 meetingl,ti�e
public earing was held over until the hlay 6, 1987, Planning Cor�nission r�eetinc�.
Up a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared tl�e mution
arried unanir��ously.
1. PUl3LIC HEAf:If�G: COWSIDERATIO�� OF A SPECIAL USE PERt4IT, SP #37-05, BY
M-E� PROPERTIES: Per Section 205.18.1, B, 2, of the Fridley City Code, tu
allova offices not associated ti�ith the principal use; per Section 205.18.1,f�, 9,
of the Fridley City Code to allo�! exterior storage of materiais and equipment
on Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, Caba Realty Addition, generally located south
of 83rd Avenue and west of University Avenue.
Mr. Billings stated this item was scheduled for the last rr� eting, but at the
petitioner's request was held over until this neetinn.
1•10TION by t1s. Sherek, seconded by t1r. Betzold, to v�aive the formal reading of
tl�e public hearing notice and to open the public i�earing.
9A
PL11P1:�I�aG COt�1NISSION t1EETIPJG, t4AY 6 1987 PAGE 2
Upon a vcice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the rwtion
carried unanimously and the public hearing open at 7:36 p.m.
t•1r. Robinson stated the property �vas located on tt�e southeast corner of 83rd
Ave. and tlain St. Tl�e zoning was t�-2, heavy industrial, surrounded by heavy
in�iustrial on the west, cornercial zoning on the sautfi, corimercial zoninq on
the east, and just recen�ly there ��as a rezoning on the north to R-3 uhich
was a proposed 353-unit apart�ent complex.
f-tr. Robinson stated the proposal was for three multi-use office/�•�aret�ouse-
type b�ii ldings. Tl�ey are three separate tax parcels at tl�is tine.
;ir. Robi��son stated th�e parl:ing was approxinately 1-500 sq. ft. which was a
speculative parking ratio for this type of developnent. It would allow for
ap��roxir�ateTy 45 0 offi ce use ar��i sti 11 enable tiie rest of the space to be
rented as warehouse and have enouc�h parE:ing.
f1r. Rot�inson stated Staff was recorunending the follov�inc� stipulations:
1. Apply for buildinq setback variance from 33rd Avenue and process
concurrently alith special use permit.
(Itr. Robinson stated because of the rezoni��a of the property across tt�e street
io �:-3, it set up a situation ►�here a setback of 100 feet from a street right-
of-�•�ay a�ould be required for industrial builciinas abutting a rigf�t-of-a�ay
a�jacent to residential. So, the buildings located at 90 f±. setbacl: anc!
35 ft. setbacl: �o the rigtit-of-way ��ould be in variance to tl�at buil�ing se*-
back code. A variance would be processed ti�rouyli the Appeals Cor�mission.)
2. Provide and record joint driverray ease�nents betr�een Lots 3, 4, and 5 where
cor�mon use is planne�. a�ners to agree prior to Council approval. Ease-
r�ents recordeJ prior to first building �ermit.
3. Provide inproved facade plans for staff approval ten days prior to Council
revie�r.
4. Provide scr�enin� for loading doors on Phase I buildinc� throu�h installa-
tion of approved plan±ings, along 33rd Avenue, ���ith Phase I construc*i�n.
(�ir. Robinson stated the pE�asing for ti�ese buildings was not certain at tliis
tir•ie, so tE�ey ►•rere asking ti�at this screening be done along 83r� Ave. v�ith the
Pi�ase I �uilding so ti�ere would be irx�ediate screenin� fror� the right-of-�•�ay
to ttie resider�tial district.)
5. Provide three decorative masonry screening vralls to screen loading doors,
one at each building.
6. Provide eigiit foot high opaque fence around s±orage area in Piiase I
construction.
� .�
PLAN"JI�1G COh9r1ISSIOIJ IiEETItJG, MAY _6� 19_87
PAGE 3
7. Developer to supply to City tenant type and buiidng area calculations
prior to each occupancy to monitor building usage and parl:ing supply.
Occupanc� of building not to exceed parkin� supply. "
8. Landscape plan to be refined and approved by Staff prior to Council
approval.
9. Provi�fe for 2 planting islands in front of eacli building on revised
plans.
h1r. Qetzold stated tiiat if tl�e buildings were intended to be built in phases,
and r�aybe the other two bui 1 di ngs ni ght never be bui 1 t, �•�hat �•�oul d i�appen wi th
the rest of the space bet�reen Building 1 and the landscaping on 33rd Ave.?
�•1r. Robinson stated it would just be a natural grassy area tf�at r�oulci have to
be mo�ved.
��r. t-laerte�is stated his intent at this ti�e a�as to improve the soil, take out
the �eat, and use sand to bring it up to grade and grade it off. It �•ias his
inLe►it to inprove the Phase III area over a period of ti�e as r�aterials becane
availa�le. fie stated all three lots have very bad soil.
t1r. �•taerte►�s stated he had a probl em wi tli sti pul ati on �4. I�e vras not i n favor
of the landscaping alon� 83rd Ave. with the Phase I construction. That lan�i-
scaping ►ras quite a►��ay fron the buildinc�. Building plans could chanye over
a period of tine, and he really thought it ��ould be money poorly spent to
landscape �hat area at tliis tine. The residential buildings were one-half block
away fron the building. Tl�e loading docks would be of decorative bloc4:. A
loi of business centers sir:iilar to this really have the loading area riqht in
front ��here people can service it. It is a combination service area and office
area, so he did not think these loading doors would be particularly offensive.
�ir. t•taertens stated right now this is a tentative landscape plan. Thin�s
could change, driveways could be relocated, and the buildin�s could get
slightly re-orientecl. Two years fror� no�� they could be tearing out landscapin�
tl�ey just put in. Ile strongly felt it 4�as ►�aasted resources to put in that
landscaping at t{iis time. (�evr landscapin4 was not going to conceal these
loading doors on that side any�ray, especially frora a three-story apartrrent
building.
Mr. Rot�ir�son stated the apartr�ent bui ldin� v�ould start occupancy in the fal l.
Of course, the landscaping plans �•�ere tentative, but there should he sone
screening. Landscaping was required regardless of the type of use, an�! in the
event a driveway needed to be realigned, trees could be noved. f�e stated it
was obvious tl�at it would be difficult to screen anything fror� a second or
third story of the apartnent building, but regardless of what goes in on the
property, a 20 ft. setback was required and tl�at has to be landscaped. He
did not think it was an unnecessary or unfruitful investr�ent.
9C
PLJ��Jr�I!JG C(►�1t11SSI0N ttEETIt�G, t1AY 6 1937 pprF Q
Mr. t�taertens stated another stipulation (#5) he would like to see deleteci �•ras
the one providing three decorative r�asonry screening walls to screen the
loaciing �ioors, one at each buildin�. Ne stated this buildinc� ��as goinc�. to
be quite attractive, and he did not think the loading doors were unattractive,
so he did not see the need for the masonry screening walls. Other buildings
siriilar to this do not have screening v�alls to i�ide their loading doors.
t4r. Robinson stated two masonry walls would be very short. The one wall that
faced tl�e residential area would be about 30-35 ft, long. Ne realiy felt
the r�asonry screening ��alls were an inportant component in screening the
loadin� dock doors.
F1r. t�iaertens stated anoLher thing he would like to point out was that it �ras
his understanding tliat he would be required to have an irrigation system
in the landscaped area. An irrigation syster� would have to be located in
co��junction with the Pi�ase II buil�ing, instead of Phase I. It would be o�1*.
of sequence to put in irrigation in Phase I to take care of those plantinc�s.
;1r. Robinson state� tl�at an.irrigation syste� could be put in ►�ith an extra
coupling so that r�lien Phase II was developed, they could disengage from the
Pliase I syster� and hool: up to Phase II.
(1�TI0�� �y 11s. Sherek, seconded by 11r. Betzold, to close tlie public hearing,
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson QilTings declared the public
hearing closed at 3:03 p.n.
�1s. Sherek stateci that regarding the landscaping along 83rd Ave,, she really
fel t tl�at 1 andscapi ng �vould have to go i n at s�c�e poi nt, and she v�oul d he
inclined to agree riitli stipulation �4 tf�at it be placecl in there no�•�.
If they ►•�ere looking at a possible 5-10 years before Phase II, she did nnt
think it was fair to asl; the residents in tfie apartments across the street
to looE: at tiie back side of the building for tliat period of tirie. As far as
the irrigation systen, that ��ould have to be put in for Phase I anyway.
�10TI0"� by 11r, Betzold, seconded by Ms. Sherel:, to recommend to Ci ty Counci 1
approval of Special Use Permit, SP �87-05, by �1-6 Properties, per Section
205.18.1, a, 2, of the Fridley City Code to alloar offices not associated
witi� the principal use; per Section 205.1a.1, a, 9, of the Fridley Ci*y Code
to allori exterior storage of materials and equiprient on Lots 3, 4, and 5,
Block 2, Caba Realty Addition, generally located soutti of 83rd Avenue and
west of University Avenue, ���ith the follov�ing stipulations:
1. Apply for building setback variance fror� II3rd Avenue and process
concurrently r�i th speci al use pern�i t.
2. Provide and record joint drive�•�ay easer�ents between Lots 3, 4,
and 5��I�ere cor.unon use is planned. Ormers to agree prior to
Council approval. Ease�ents recorded prior to first building
permit.
3. Provide ir�proved facade plans for staff approval ten days prior
to Council reviev�.
P��'�r�Ir�G CUr�f��ISSiO�� r�EETIt�G, t��AY 6, 1987
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
• �
PAGE 5
Provide screening for loading doors on Phase I building through
installation of approved plantings along 83rd Avenue with
Piiase I construction.
Provide three decorative riasonry screening walls to screen loading
doors, one at each building.
Provide eight foot high opaque screening fence around storage area
in Phase I construction.
Developer to supply to City tenant type and buildin� area calcula-
tions prior to each occupancy to monitor building usage and parkinq
supply. Occupancy of building not to exceed parking supply.
Landscape plan to be refined and approved by Staff prior to Council
approval.
Provide for two planting is�ands in front of each building on
revised plans.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Cl�airperson Billings declared the r�otion
carried unanimously.
�10TION by �1r. Betzol d, seconded by �1r. Kondri ck, to al 10�� Sti pul ati on �1
regarding the variances to go straight to the City Council from tliP Ap�eais
Commission rather than having to cor�e back tl�rough the Planning Cor.�mission
first.
t1r. Billings stated he feit the Co�mission was cognizant of the fact that the
residential developr�ent across the street has, in fact, had an ir�pact on this
property after the time Mr. tiaertens entered into his purchase agreer�ent; and
at tl�is tir�e, the reason for the 100 ft. setback was so tl�e residential
property wasn't buffered right up against unattractive lookinq properties.
He thought the variances had to be tied to a good looking landscape plan.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Gillings declared tf�e rnotion
carrieci unanimously.
t4r. Robinson stated the variances arould go before the Appeals Cor�mission on
�•1ay 26 and both tl�e variances and special use permit requests would go to
the City Council on June 1.
2. PU[3LIC HENRI�JG: CO�JSIDERATIO"� OF A SPECIAL USE PEWIIT, SP #87-07,
DAVID SIPtIGAGLIO: Per Section 205.07.1, C, l, of the Fridl ' y Code to
allor� a second accessory building on Lots 23 and 29 cc 1, Plymouth
Addition, the same being 4875 - 3rd Street N.
MOTIOtJ by f4r. Kondrick, seconded s. Sherek, to waive the formal reading
o� t�ie pub�ic hearing noti nd to open the public hearing.
Upon a voice vo , all voting aye, Chairperson Bil9ings �eclared the motion
carried una ' ously, and the public hearing open at 8:10 p.m.
�.
• -
r
7
►
1
��
.
. I
i
i
�
J�
� L.
j„ � _._
�
L
, •
LOCATION MAP
sp #8�-05 lg F
�./yj�i�.�l�~�/�.'�i ,� M-B Properties
��° - .- - - . - - - - � - -
� �� �'
� jV,
I I tl� �� 1
1 I ' �
� . �1ny Tris 3'� � . • • \. �_ ._- ' .
.? 5 •f ( �.
� j - — - .' _ � ' ( � �i
r�: � � il
� ,., ,
.: ,�•_�_ � `.+ � 11
-t _` . • -- - - -- _ �i I 3 t ' • ' ,�
i � _ � ,ii ; ' �
1 ..: - ^ ( * � :tl I . f
� j -- - -- � � � i� b -- I
� b � ^ �,
:
� g�, . > � . � �
� �. ' t ` ,� � � ao a
� * • w rn o � ' � :W ---�
o i o a `' 'a f , { � �. �
� y �t• - - - - ' h � �. �� °` q ,{ _ o _ t
. I �— � 7 °. '1 _ - � �,
�� I
�� ��- -- - i:. �� Vl
� �+i 1 i� i . �_j -��
, :�i� � ;
I � '• - ; .
� ^!� r ` : I ' �
i ,
� � � � � , � �i _ � ��
I--' :�M �.... 1 1 t--- I
� ,. . . _ _ _ �
. . _ I ; _ _ __� � Ir
� .. 1 ;K� ' ,1' '___� � ,
� 1 � - �� �_�. _ - _ �--� �_-�
< �� " � i �
Y �" � � � `—_ —y/J �x=-:- . � /
� . Rt � ,i � _ ___ " _ _' '. ""
e�• h ' .
� ' � �
� ' _ ti r � = ,�� � - � � , � � � � � �� � �
' , �
^ ' ~ ..._, �r �F-�F-i s-..e-N�-4 � \
+ I ``�
11 I ' 1
' ,:
LQAOMI�% /I� r 1
I �� LOA7�N� /�L/A I
� I �1 �' �
I � t
� If � 7r. A.:G '�.I� '
/ou� X � � i
�I i
�� ' ' 1
iM �
�� �'�.", . ..v;��_ . ' :!i� r...._ � �.._�p�IL�. �1
�I ' _ _��3� '
I � I
, i'i ' I� ! 1 l � I
� � ^ IT E PLA N
S
�
i
I'
�
I '�
I
� -
i j
: �
I -�
1
�':
i I
, I
I i-
I �
i
� i„
�-
r� � o
Q �
� I=
m =
� �
,
i=
I�
i,
I '�
� �
.i _ . _s,l� �
I I `� � I
I 3\!-�.--
;� ; :�
r
s
�
�
�
�
z
<
�
T � a
�!
�I
��
a,
�
f
�
�-i�
-- �---�s�xvw-- `� �---- � -- -------
REVISED LANDSCAPING PLAN - 6/08/87
��'�'
���'
r
�
�
t
. Z�
�o
; � � �Z
� ��
, ���
f Q
Z
�
4
�
�
��
r-. .,
i ,i ,- .
il iI . -
�
� ' 1
�
� �
�:.
�
�il
� ��l3
�. � � �
�! ! �i
� �
I� .
. � i
. t
I
. � i
t '
':�
�i�
0
9H
i! �
i
� ..
.-
� ' I � �
� • ��
� .�•
$ .
_ REV_ISED ELEVATIONS - 6/08/87
f��ERTIIVS �'�11` OC�VSTI�JCT � ON
SP �37-05
ST I R�AT IOIVS
STAFF ANFI�ED 6/ 11 /87
1. APPLY FOR BUILDING SETBACK VARIANCE FROM 83F2D AVENUE AND PROCESS
CONCURREMLY WI TH SPECI AL USE PEF�hi I T, (PHCxESSE� �ROUo-t 5/26/87
APPEALS.)
��
2' "" �rov i��, a r�GO'�c� a� o� n� - dvi V��, /G� e.a, e�i� e�'�` v�vNC� �r1 �a+ '�, ���
�'rior �a �i�r :�' �ui�d'� ��r �v�if .
�
3. PROVIDE IMPROVED FACADE PLANS FOR STAFF APPROVAI. TEN DAYS PR10R TO
COUNC I L(�V I EYJ. ( REV I SED ELEVAT I ONS RECE I VED 6/�8f 87 ; END ELEVAT I UN
kW7ER I ALS SHOLLD 5E C()NS I STENT W I TH FflONT ELEVAT I ON. ) Al.l. LO�AD! NG DO(�S
AND MAN DOORS I N LQAD I NG AFZF�4 TO EE PA I IVfED TO SUFTEN V I SI�AL APPEARANCE ,
UT I L I lY NETERS TO BE 70TALLY SCftEENED FRCM PI�L I C V I EW.
4. PROV I DE SCREEN I NG FOk LOAD I NG DOORS UN PHASE ONE BU i L p I NG TH RQUGH
I NSTALLAT I ON CF A[3ERM W I?}-I SHRl,88ERY i N 1HE OPEN AREA ALONG �RD AVENUE
( PLWV TO BE APPROVED BY STAFF) W I TH F�IASE C1� OONSTRUCT � C1N,
5, FtLL M�JND ADJACENT TO 83F� AVEIVI� TO BE �EMW���� RIUR 70 QCCU� NCY �'
PHASE (�E BU I LD i NG.
6. PROV I DE A�CARA i i vc NIASq�RY SCREENI NG WALL AT 1HE IV�11 C�R(�ER CF BU jLQ l NC�
THF2EE TO SCREEN LQADING DOORS,
7. PRG/ I DE E I C�iT FOOT H I(�i OPAQI� SCREEN I NG FENCE AROUNp STOFtAGE AREA l H
PHASE �VE ODNSTRUCTION. W� y�ly�,�j ��,�i�°�'�, +�ro��. ��i�Mr.��i'�.�y�'.
8. DEVE7..OPER TO SUPPLY TO C I 1Y TENANT TYPE AND BU I LD I NG AREA CALCULAT I ONS
PRIOR To EACN OCCI�ANCY To MONITOK uSAGE AND PARKING SUPPLY. OCCUPaI�Y
NOT TO EXCEED PARKING SU'PLY. �
9, pLL GFtEEN AREJ�S TO HAVE AUTCNWT I C UVDER6ROUND SPR ( I�NQ. I NG.
,
1� , ALL SHRUE3 BEDS TO BE ED(�0 AND M11.41ED W I TH ROCK ()VER A V�Ep �ARR I ER.
11. LA�DSCAPE FLAN T�0 EiE f�EF I PED TO I NCLUDE :
A) 1tiV0 TECHNY ARBqZV I TAE �DG�S. PLANTED 3'FEET ON EFIYTERr LACATEI? .ON T1�
IVORTH AND SOUM CF THE LQADING AREA DRIVE CFF M41N STREET,
!3i PLANTING5 FOR 1HE GREEN AREA EAST CF BUILDING TWO.
C) STREEi TREES, 40 FEET ON CENTER. AL.ONG.MAIN STRE�T.
� �' Nf��Vi�u4� Z1�'1�j
12. A CC�WREFIENS I VE S I GN PLAN TO 6E PRW 1�D PR I OR TO ��,.���
- - - -- _ --- �• . _ - - ..:
��fl f N6. - " _
- - :.
13, MATERIAL SAMPLES OF ALL FACADE MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR STAFF
APPRO�VAI. PR I OR TO CONSTRUCT I qV PERM I TT I NG.
LIC
A�T� ON LICEN5�S FOR THE AGENDA G/15/87
--------------------------------------
iZ�TAIL GASDLIN� SALES
---------------------
✓i�T�R�% �NTcP.P�IS�S/D�SA DAN HANNA MARK RICHG�LS RICHAR� LAi�SON
AUTO �c1A_�H FIR� INSPFCTOR
73RD & !iNIV�RSZTY
FRIUL�y'. MN.
FOt7D U�NICL�
�LITT�RFT�L�i V�NDING
52 i 8TH A'v'�. N. E.
MPLS. .MN.
ITINERANT FvOD P�RMIT
---------------------
Fr2IDL��>' HOCK�/ F�OOST�RS
147G — G4TH AV�. N.�.
FRIvL�Y, MPd.
FIP.EvJt?RKS
F?IDLEl� V. F, t.t1. POST 363
1 �40 t?SF�ORN� ROAD AI. �.
F�ID(_�y, MN.
rARciN TURNER
SHIT�L�y NEVALA
$60.00
$50.00
EXEh1PT
P�T?MIT IS CONTINGENT UPON THE CITy RECEIVING
CONFIRMATIVN OF A 1,000,00� INSURANCE POLIC)%
NAMING CITY AS ADDITZUNAL INSLIRED
� ' � ► �'�i i� � ' � �
' •: i
' � � �
� ��11. :
1, APPLY FOR BUILDING SETBACK VARIANCE FROM 83RD AVENUE AND PROCESS
CONCURRENTLY W I TH SPEC I AL USE PEF�I I T. � PROCESSED THROUC�i 5/26/87
�+PPEALS, ) "
2. LJEVELOPER TO 001�16I NE LOTS 3, 4 avo 5 I NTO OI�E TAX PARCFL TO MEET SETBACK
ttEIIUI REMENTS.
3. PROVIDE IMPROVED FACADE PLANS FOR STAFF APPROVAL TEN DAYS PRIOR TO
COUNCIL kEVlEYJ. �REVISED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED 6/08/87: END ELEVATIUN
MATER I PLS SHOI.I.D E3E CONS I STENT W I TH FRONT ELEVATI ON. ) ALL LOAD I NG DOORS
AND MAN DOORS IN LQADING AREA TO BE PAINTED TO SOFTEN VISUAL APPEARANCE.
UT I L I TY METERS TO BE TOTALLY SCFtEEI�ED FRCM PUBL I C V I EW .
4, PRUV I DE SCREEN I NG FOk LOAD I NG DOORS UN PHASE ONE BU I LD I NG THROUGH
I NSTALLAT i CNV C� A BERM W I 1H SHRI�BERY I N THE OPEN AREA ALONG 83RD AV ENUE
(PL.WV TO BE APPROVED BY STAFF) WITH PHASE ONE CONSTRUCTION.
5, FILL MOUND ADJACENT TO 83RD AUENI� TO BE RENIOVED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY �
PHASE ONE BUILDING.
6. PRCIV I DE A UECORAT I VE MASONRY SCREEN I NG WALL AT THE I�W CORNER CF BU I L D I NG
THREE TO SCREEN LQADING DOORS, ONE AT EA4i BUILDING.
7. PFtON I DE E I C�iT FOOT H I(�i OPP�UE SCREEN I NG FENCE AROUND STORAGE AREA I N
PHASE ONE CONSTRUCTION, •
8. DEVELOPER TO SUPPLY TO CITY TENANT TYPE AND BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS
PRIOR TO EACH OCCUPANCY TO MONITq2 USAGE AND PARKINC SUPPLY. OCCUPANCY
IvOT TO EXCEED PARKING SUPPLY.
9. PLL GkEEN AREAS TO HAVE AUTC�IATIC UNDERGROUND SPRINI�ING.
10 , ALL SHRl�3 BEDS TO EiE EDCf Q AND Ml.l4iED W I TH ROCK OVER A WEED BARR I ER.
11. LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE REFINED TO INCLUDE:
A) TWO TECHNY ARBORV i TAE HEIX�ES, PLANTED 3 FEET ON CEIVi�ER. LOCATED ON 1NE
NOR1H AND SOUTH CF THE LQADING AREA DRIVE CFF MAIN STREET.
B) PLANTINGS FOR THE GkEEN AREA EJ�ST CF BUILDING TWO.
C) STREET TREES, 40 FEET ON CENTER. ALONG MAIN STREET.
12. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF PHASE ONE
E3UILD1 NG. SI GNAGE TO I NCLUDE I ND I V I DUAL RAi SED LETTERS LOCATED ON
BURN I SHED BLOCK PANEL ABONE W I t�A�JS,
13. MATERIAL SAMPLES OF ALL FACADE MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR STAFF
APPRCNPL. PR I OR TO CONSTRUCT I ON PEf�NI I TT I NG.
�
o PLANNING DIVISION
� MEMOR.ANDUM
ci�roF
f Rl DLEY .
N� ZU: Jock Robertson, Con�urauiity Developnent Director
p�N� FRpM; Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator J�
�� �TE: June 10, 1987
R�GI�RDItvG: M-B Properties Variance #87-17
In canj�ction with a proposal to �nstruct three office warehouse structures
at the southeast corner of t�lain Street ana 83rd Avenue, variances for
building setback from a right-of-way adjacent to residential have been
processed throuc� the Appeals CAmmission. A setback of 100 feet from 83rd
Was imposed when the land north of 83rd was rezoned to residential for the
Springbrook Apartrr.ent project.
Due to the proposed five year phasing of the project it was reoor�nended that
Cotmcil extend the utility of the variance for f ive years.
��
i�87-136
0
�
10A
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS COP1t1ISSI0t� PICETItJG, t4AY 26, 1987
CALL TO ORDER:
Chai rperson l3etzol d cal l ed the t1ay 26, 1987, Appeal s Cor.�issi on rneeti ng to arder
at 7:32 p.r�.
ROLL CALL:
i4eribers Present: Donald Qetzold, Alex Barna, Jerry Sherek, Diane Savage,
Kenneth Vos
Menbers Absent: iJone
Oti�ers Presenf Darrel Clark, City of Fridley
Joe Plaertens , 144 Ri ver Edge LJay
Richard & J�ne Franta, 6251 Rainbow Dr. PJ.E.
Tom & Jenny Ri ley, 25Q1 - 13th Terrace N.tJ. , tJew Bri gfiton
Pat & P-like Serie, 1531 Woodside Court
Willard & Verna Bolling, 6241 Rainbow Dr. N.E.
Richard Narris, 6200 Riverview Terrace
Jim Sackrison, Belt Line Construction
Gene Owczarcak, Elo Cngineerinc�
APPROVAL OF t1AY 12, 1987, APPEALS COt1t1ISSI0P� �1IfJl1TFS:
t�OTIOt� by t1r. Qarna, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to approve the �1ay 12, 1937,
Appeal s Conmi s si on mi nutes wi th the fol l ovii ng amendment under �1er�bers Present:
"Sue Sl�erek" should be changed to "Jerry Sherek".
UP()N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIP�G AYE, CI�AIRPERSO�� BETZOLD DECLARED TNF ��lOTIO��
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
l.
CO��SIUERATIOW OF VARIAP�CE REQUESTS, VAR #37-17, QY ��-B PROPERTIES, PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 205.1i3.3, D, 4a, OF THE FRIp_LEY CITY C�DE TO DECREASE TNE SETBACK
✓VCNUE A��D WEST OF U I ERSL Y AVEPJUE N.E., FRIDLCY, ttIfJt�ESOTA, 55432.
MOTIOt� by t1s. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson (3Qtzold declared the public
hearing open at 7:34 p.m. �
Chairperson Betzold reacl the Administrative Staff Report:
� :
APPEALS C0�IMISSIOP� t4EETII�G, f�1AY 26, 19II7 PAGE 2
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
SOUTH OF 83RD AVEP�UE At�D I�tEST OF Ut�IVERISTY AVENUE N.E.
VAR #87-17
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED QY REQUIRE�IENT:
Section 2Q5.18.3, D, 4a, requires that whenever any industrial district
is adjacent to a residential district, permitted buildinc�s and uses
shall not be less closer to a street right-of-way line than 100 feet.
The public purpose served by this requirement is to avoid congestion in
the public street, traffic hazards, and other dangers, and to protect
and conserve the character of any adjoining neic�hborhoods and fut��re
neighborhoods in the same vicinity.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"A i00 foot setback on 33rd was imposed when t�ie land north of 83rd v�as
rezoned residential."
C. Recently the City Council rezoned a 21-acre site, north of 83rd and
east of the Nature Center, from M-2, heavy industrial, to R-3, multiple
fanily dwellings. This ctiange created a need for a 100 foot setback
from 83rd for the now proposed t�-2 buildings to the south of 83rd.
The proposal by �1-B Properti.es includes three office/warehouse buildings
of brick and block with extensive landscapinc� and Toading door screening
walls. Due to the quality of considerations of the office/warehouse
proposal, the setback variances should not pose a problem for the apart-
ment complex.
Staff is working out specific landscaping and screening plans along with
the pending Special Use Permit application,
Mr. Clark stated the petitioner intended to build three buildings in three
phases on the three lots. The tirne schedule proposed was for Phase I building
this summer, Phase II building would depend upon the occupancy rate of Phase I
within 3-5 years from now, and Phase III building a�ould begin when Phase I and
Phase II were completed, f�e stated landscaping was b�aing addressed with the
Planning Departr�ent, and the perimeter would be heavily landscaped so that the
apartment complex would probably not be able to see much of the congestion
created by the industrial buildings.
Mr. Clark stated there was a special use permit before the Planning Comnission
on May 20 for the use of office/waretiouse in a11 three buildings. This was
approved by the Planning Commission.
t�ls. Savage stated that in the Administrative Staff Report, it stated: "Due
to the quality of considerations of the office/warehouse proposal, the setback
variances should not pose a problem for the apartment complex." tJhat did that
mean?
10C
APP�ALS COfiP4ISSI0N MEETI�JG, �1AY 26, 1987 _ PAGE 3
P4r. Clark stated he did not v�rite that, but he thought it meant that the
architectural exterior of the buildinc�s were such that it did not look like
a plain old v�arehouse. The buildings a�ould be well constructed brick build-
ings with a low profile.
Ntr. Qob �laertens stated he did purchase the land before the property across
the street was rezoned. These were relatively small lots, about 200 ft.
deep , and 100 ft. setbacks on Phase I and Phase II would cause a severe loss
of property. As he understood it, a 100 ft. setback ��aas intended on Main St. ��hen
industrial was across from residential; but in this case, the apartment
cornplex was cor.�ing into an already zoned industrial area, and he did not
tliink the 100 ft. setback was appropriate in this case.
f�r. Clark stated Phase II and Phase III v�ould not be done in the first year,
and variances usually expire after one year, at �,►hich time the petitioner
has to come in for a renewal. Since the petitioner was pretty sure that
P��ase II would be within 3-5 years and Phase III after that, he would recommend
that if the Appeals Corrmission recoc�mends approval of the variances that they
also recommend that the variances be approved for a period of five years, and
then at the end of five years, if the buildings are not finished, the petitioner
would i�ave to come back to ttie City for a renewal.
��r, tlaertens stated he realized that variances expire after one year, and
that was fine if the City decided to extend those variances. He just wanted
the City to go on record that it had no objections to this development.
Mr. Qetzold asked Mr. Maertens to briefly describe his development plans.
Mr. P•1aertens stated that rather than call it office/warehouse space, they.
prefer to ca',l it office service space, because he thought the modern office/
warehouse building space was designed differently than, +`or exar�ple, most of
the buildings presently along P1ain Street. Architecturally speakinc�, there
Yrere sone pretty coarse-looking buildings along there, f�is buildings were
more along the lines of the East River Road Business Center, more attractive,
higher quality buildings. � _
P1r. Richard Narris, 6200 Riverview Terrace, stated he owned Block 7, Onaway,
and Block 5, East Ranch Estates. He stated again this was another business
center in an industrial zoning, and he had expressed his objections to that
� at the May ZOth Planning Commission r�eeting, in that the City was circumventing
the zoning code with special use permits and "sleight of hand".
Mr. Harris asked if this property was in the tax increment district.
��1r. 6laertens stated it was not, and he was not receiving any public financing.
�ir. Narris stated he thought P1r, t�laertens had a valid point, that the City
should have taken his property into consideration when the rezoned the 22
acres to the north of it residential. Ne stated Mr. Maertens should not have
even had to apply for variances.
�' 1
1
�
, _
�
;
.,
'.,
, :� �
�---�--- - ,
� ,
'J�
' I.
��,����
I
�o
�
�
�
� �
I
_
LOCATION MAP
,,. .� ��.
� r : � -,... `� ///
':��i :
6
0
' �I
� �
( i
�
� �;
�
1 �
:���
�
r�
�
�
%. �� i ��i 1
r'�/�t�i'�%I.��:��' � -
• � � � � �.
��_� �1 i � � Y►� � � 1 � ■
;��
�ill
�1v11t1�`-.��� „s
,.
— •��-._
�--
�
I 'p
�
� #8�-�� 1 0
M-B Praperties
�---�—� -
I �;
I �
!"'- I �L""'` I �
� �r— ----� � �.
� ;.
��,
�,
� �a
� �-- � , -�. ��. - �
�
e � - - - - - = ° ; k `: ' �_ _ ;.
I � ' ,� ,1 , - — _ -
a � � � � �! b
s � a � , F � � ��
: ,. �, < <
. e �
' N rn _` � �` M ' � C -1 I . �
� � _
!� 7 �� - - - •- �. H i � : � ti � ' � � � -�
' � ' " °'p ►��- � --�
.'� 3� �f � ��
� r i �:� � � - �
� . _ . - ,: i � � �,
i, I i : � ; i� / ' .,,�.
I � ---� ' , ''' _ -� 4
, t;� � �
�� � � � �I' —= ' � �
�`— �, i � ' � — � ��`
�---—, ��_- = � �
' ' ' - - - • ' . '_` I ` : - -- — . i ,r
� • ;i . � - --- �d r .� ' ._ _= '—_1 ,_—, � ' I
� ; � . -- :
e % ' � � i ��
' '' . � ��,—= -- _ __ --�� �� �
�, � � . ' �
�
��- - - -'- - - ,-_�. .._.��-.._�.y _�_ _ --- - '`--_�-�'.
_ �_.__s-----�—�. � I �
� �
, ; �
� �', LOA}+• /�l/A LO•�Owi /I[EA — . . �
� � � �
1 � I` �
" I D�A1 � ��� �,��/J� � '
� W�'• �^`^`.�' � , ,
�
. �
` ,� �.�' FaoM R•aMl. ioo' 35' �i
, , �� w�y � �;
�� , . �
� � � I 'i
, r - � _ . ._ :,� -- - ---�- ,.
-:.�-- � ; � , ,,
'`� �' ' 1�1J�1 I I� II Iil _
�� ,II � I
��
���I
�
�i',ac„vG cor I
ili�ll�li i I 'lil 1►���_,
_ _ --- - -
�
'SITE PLAN
APPEALS C0�1t1ISSI0�� P1EETING, MAY 26, 1987
PAGE 4
10G
Mr. Barna stated he agreed. He thought Mr. t4aertens' property and th
property to the east had been taken into consideration before that zoning
took place. He knew it was addressed in discussions at the Appea Commission
meeting.
"10TIOP� by Mr. Barna, seconded by �4s. Savage, to close the p ic hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold d clared the public
hearing closed at 7:49 p.m.
i�tr. Barna stated that he�had made the assumption t t when the Appeals
Cor�mission approved the variances for the apart�n t complex that the industrial
zoned property and the gen�ral business zoned operties already in existence
would not be affected with the normal setbac being increased. So, he was
extremely surprised to see this come befor the Appeals Commission. Personally,
he felt that the zoni�c� was after the fa . The City knew this property would
be developed either industrial or co� cial before the apartment complex
rezoning v�ent through. This property hould not be penalized for a change in
a zoning in the area.
Mr. Sherek stated he agreed. Tp� administratively ir�posed hardship was
obvious. He would be in favoy�of recorr�ending approval of the variances.
Ms. Savage also agreed.
Mr. Betzold stated th as pointed out by Mr. Qarna, it a�as fairly obvious
there was a hardship The intent of the code ��as being Met by the heavy
landscaping to scr en the two areas. He stated it looked like a good project.
MOTION by Mr. rna, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend to City Council
approval of riance requests,. VAR #87-17, by M-Q Properties, v�ith the
recommenda on that due to the scheduiing of development that the variances
be exten d for a period of five years.
Upon voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the motion
car ed unanimously.
. Betzold stated this item would go to City Council on June 15.
2. COt�SIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #87-18, BY RICHARD AND JAYP�E FRANTA
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205.07.D 2a OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE
RFnurRrn sTnE YARD SETQACK FROP•1 10 FEET TO 2 FEET, TO ALLOW TNE C�tJSTRUC7I
�H(lt tStll`7G bL51 KH11V[3UW U�CtYC rt.e. � fR1ULL1 � en�. � JJTJL.•
MOTION by T•1r. Barna, seconded by �1r. Sherek, to :open the publ i c heari ng.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the public
hearing open at 7:51 p.m.
Chairperson Qetzold read the Administrative Staff Report:
10H
APPEALS COttMISSION MEETIP�G t1AY 26 1987 PAGE 5
ADt1INISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
6251 RAIt�BOW DRIVE N.E.
VAR #87-18
A. PU6LIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.07.3, D, 2a, requires a side yard setback of 10 feet
between any living area and side property lines.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum
of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet
between garages and iiving areas in adjacent structures to reduce
exposure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aestheti-
cally pleasing open areas around residential structures.
B. STATED HARDSI.IIP:
(Please see Exhibit A for a�escription of the hardship.)
C. ADt1I��ISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEt•l:
The petitioners are proposing to build an addition to their existing
� house. The proposed addition would extend to within approximately
two feet of the side lot iine due to the fact that this lot line cuts
across at an angle. The petitioner desires this location for the
addition so that it lines up with the rest of the house. .
If the Board approves this request, staff has no stipulations to
recommend.
Mr. Clark stated that if the variance was approved, he would add a stipulation
that the new west wall of the addition be one-hour fire-rated and no openinqs
in that wai1, at least until the wall gets behind the house to the west.
P�r. Clark stated the corner of the petitioner's house and the edge of the
neighbor's house (to the west) in the front ti��as 23 ft. and 19-20 ft.
between the rear corners of both houses. The petitioner would like to add
14 ft. off the back keeping the straight line of the house. i�e stated part
of the problem was the petitioner's liouse was built only 5 ft. from the lot
line in the rear. He was not sure of the reason for tf�at, but there had been
a surveying error in other parts of Sylvan tiills so that might have been the
reason in this case also.
�Ar. Clark stated that in the agenda, the petitioner had drawn ttie plan for
the proposed addition he would like. I�e liad also drawn two alternatives--one
to put the bedroon and bath off the back of the house but ten feet over which
was a less desireable alternative and one to put the bedroom and bath on the
second floor which was probably not too economically feasible.
P�r. Franta stated they presently have a three bedroom house. They have
three children--2 sons and 1 daughter. One son is retarded and is presently
10�
APPEALS COt1t�ISSION �1EETIPJG, t1AY 26 1987 PAGE 6
sharing a bedroom with the other son. As a result, the other son has his
belongings, school books, school projects, etc., crushed and broken by the
retarded son, They need to add on another bedrooro so the retarded son.can
have his belongings in an open environment. So, the primary i�ardst�ip was to
get another bedroon for the other son.
Mr. Frania stated they could add on without a variance by movin� the addition
over 10 feet. By doing that, it would block the kitchen windaw and basement
widdow and cut out tf�e ventilation to the basement. It would also change the
master bedroom and bath into separate bedrooms anci a landlocked bathroorn
wfiich would not be connected to either of the bedrooms. It was his opinion
that a bathroom in the middle that was not connected to any bedroom would be
more of a detriment to the house and would decrease the value of the house.
He felt adding on in the middle would break the house up into segments and
would occupy too much space in hallways.
Ms. Franta stated their retarded son was 7 years old, but acted about the age
of a t���o-year-old. He wou1d not progress much past a 3-4 year-old. She stated
he needed constant supervision and care. He was a walker but did not ta1k.
P1s.Savage asked about the alternative of adding the bedroom and bath on the
second floor.
Mr. Franta stated that adding on the second floor would require significant
more pipiiig and ducting to get heating and for the bathroom. It would require
tearing out sorie of the existing walls. It would also cost significantly �ore
to add on on the second floor.
Mr. t�Jillard Qolling, 6241 Rainbow Drive, stated he was the property owner to
ti�e west. He wanted to know if the wall of the addition would be 2 ft. from
the lot line or the eaves.
Mr. Franta stated the wall of the addition would be 2 ft, from the lot line,
so the eaves would be quite close to ti�e lot line.
t•1r. Sherek stated that Mr. Clark had mentioned a surveying error in this
neighborhood. Had 11r. Franta gotten a recent survey before proposing this
addition?
f1r. Franta stated he had not, but would get a survey done before any
construction.
��r. Qetzold asked P1r. & Mrs. Qolling if they could foresee the possibility of
adding on to the east end of their�house in the back and if they had any
objection to the addition as proposed by Mr. Franta.
t4r. Qolling stated that as f ar as they were concerned, they had no need to
add onto the house. He did not know what a future owner might want to do.
As far as he and his wife were concerned, they did not object to the addition.
APPEALS COflP1ISSIOP� t•1EETI��G, �1AY 26, 1981 PI�GE 7
10J
t1r. Betzold stated that even though t1r. & �1rs. Qolling did not object to the
addition, it did concern hin that a future owner might want to build on
the back towards the Franta's house. If this variance was approved, the
Corimission would have to deny any future variance request because of the
congested area already.
MOTIOPJ by t1r. Barna, seconded by t�s. Savage, to close the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the public
hearing closed at 3:08 p.m.
Mr. Barna stated he did not like to see an addition with a jog in the wall;
yet, he also did not like to see a wallcoming so close to the property line.
With the proposed 2 ft. from the �ot line �•�ith a 24 inch overhang, it r�ould
put the overhang on the lot line or over the lot line.
Dr. Uos stated he had sone real concerns v�ith getting this close to a lot
line W1tI1 any structure. Looking out the dining room windows from the
neighbors to the west,ti�e proposed bedroom would look like it was in their
back yard, lie just felt tl�ere was another creative �r�ay of getting this kind
of space but over another 6-8 ft. He was already uncomfortable Yrith the
existing 5 ft. at the back corner of ti�e house.
Mr. Sherek stated he had the same concerns. Also, he was very concerned
about a"zero" clearattce; and v�ith6ut a c«rrent survey, they are not really
sure if the property line was right.
P1s. Savage stated she syropathized with the petitioner's problems and there
was obviously a need for an addition. She also could understand why the
petitioner wanted to build the addition in the location he had proposed,
but she shared the same concerns expressed by the other Commissioners in
bringing the addition so close to the property �ine.
Mr. Betzold stated he felt all the Commissioners were very sympathetic to
the petitioner's situation, but they also had a mandate they had to follow
that tl�ere had to be sor�ething unique about the property that would make it
a I�ardship to go along ►,�ith the code. He did not tt�ink the hardship was
quite as defined as it needed to be. In any event, he would definitely like
tfiis to go on to the City Council as the Appeals Commission was very uncom-
fortable about any kind of structure being so close to the property line.
P�OTION by t4s. Savage to send variance request, VAR #87-18, by Richard and
aTyne -Franta, on to the City Council without a recommendation,
�10TION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOP�D.
Mr. Barna stated he would like to recommend that the Cor►mission recommend
approval of a variance from 10 ft. to 5 ft. There v�as already the need for
a 5 ft. variance, because the house was already only 5 ft. froro the property
line. It would mean moving the addition over to the east 5 ft., and the eaves
would not be any closer to the lot line than the existing eaves are.
10K
APPEALS COt1MISSION �1EETIt�G, P1AY 26, 1987 PAGE 8
MOTION by ��r. Barna, seconded by t�r. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval
of variance request, VAR #87-18, by Richard and Jane Franta, pursuant to
Chapter 205.07.03, D, 2a, of the Fridley City Code to reduce the required
side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet, to allow the construction of•
additional living space on Lot 2, Block 2, Sylvan flills Addition, the same
being G251 Rainbow Drive N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, with the following
stipulations:
1. There be no openings in the west wall of the addition that would
be closer than 20 ft. from the existing structure to the west.
2. A certified land survey be obtained before the issuance of a
building permit.
Upon a voice vote, Barna, Sherek, Savage, and Vos�voting aye, Betzold voting
nay, Chairperson Qetzold declared the motion carried.
P•1r. Betzold stated this item would go to City Council on June 15.
3. CO�JSIDERATION OF A VARIAPJCE R UEST VAR #87-19 BY JE1lPJY RILEY, PIIRS !T
TO CHAPTER 205.07.03, D, 3a, OF TFIE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE TII. EAR
SEASOPJ PORCH I�dTO LEGAL CONFORt�IING USE ON LOT 2,_ _BLO_CK 1, RICE�REEK ESTA
2.
MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to open t�public hearinc�.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Qet d declared the public
hearing open at 8:23 p.m.
Chairperson Qetzold read the Administrativ �taff Report:
ADMINISTRATIVE AFF REPORT
1531 t�J00DS1 COURT N.E.
Vi� #87-19
A. PUQLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY�QUIREPIENT:
Section 205.07.03. D 3a, requires a rear yard setback of not less
than 25 feet.
Public purpos served by this requirement is to provide rear yard
space to b used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood.
Q. STATE �'HARDSHIP;
" ter my husband was diagnosed with leuker�ia, we decided to build
the porch to avoid bug bites which will result in an infection.
He di ed i n �4ay 18, 1985. "
_� _
_ : � EXHIBlT � o�
0
OT May 1937
_,:rral Clark
�_lty ot FridleY
.,,�j �nlvarsity Ava. �Jc
' -riaiay� ��r� �543Z
„aor Mr. Glarki
ne s��Ka on tha telephone a fey days 3�� a�o�utask�d ��ltalchack�theWSketch of
�,��1� to my ho,�a at oL51 Rainboy Jr. ac. Y
:-,a loc�tion �f my ho�na in ralation to �rY �'-1'45oyouncanese?/�t'�?Sp�'�p3rty
_nclosad you will fino ny c�rr�ctQ� diagram.
_in: is slantea aith r?sp'ctr�� lina�J,This is��Ytb3st�3uassr�srtostnsly
;iy� (�) faat fro,n tn� �roo Y
_ctual iocation of tna prvafeet fro� �ythousar1hut�it,isdnatyth��lJ,f�at you
:�uld �e as ,nucn as b or 7
;�atad as tna c�da �°Q���t���ouldsbringttheldwpllingl�ithin ahf�otdo�1tWOWOt
�;,,� in rinci (:rith ��.s
�na pro,:arty lina.
�a teel that this addition is vary nacassGry for our tamily. `�y ret�rdad 5on
:; aresently sharin� a room with my oldar son and tha co,nbin��tion do�s not
.,orK vary well. �IY retardad son must hava his own room so that ha is not able
CO ��s.'St�'Oy �P L3,ppar .uith tOyS/ DOQkS 3�td SCh�nln�oO,ihai 1�1h15COWf1.y Suchuan
,l�zr son. Tn� r�tarued s�n v�ry ruc`� na�ds
:raa wouia not nava tu nava lociceC door�� boltad�dr�war� an� 3v?rytninc+ pl�czd
�n �nelv_s out of ra�ch. Tnis is tha aresent stata•of .�y sons roo�. �+s have
�:,,o�c�d for iuryar no�n�s in Fridl�y �ut have not founa any to our liicin� as y�t.
;na addition pic2ureo converts one �ras�nt �Qdr�om into a hall and �a*iition�l
�atnr�o.n. T'13 dddlLlOf1 is ih=n t�o oadroo�ns. Th2 nat rasult is to add ona
��o�p;,7 ano a oatn to out prasent nousa.
;iva� the location of the smallest presant bedroo,n which will ba use� for the
naW hallu�ay �nd bath� it is not very feasible to �nov� tne additi�� the
�aquired ten feat to maet the cods require,nant. Such a�nova Would:
raauira tna addition of an 'xtra hallway to accass th2 bedro�mi
:nake th3 addad b�thro��n smallar�
placa tha bathroom in a position whs�a it could not b� consida��d
as a�astsr bath in the on3 S�drQa.��
co.nplicatas tna ro�f lin�� consid3ra�ly�
shuts ott a basament �uindo� which is neadad for liyht �nd v?ntin;�
;nuts �ff ina windo� prss3ntly in tha kitc!�an� and
raauira us to rov� th� P�'�'�t '1'ctric:l matar �nd mast.
i hava incluaed arawings of tho prasant housa� our olanned ad�ition =nd the
'I adaition that r�uld b� �aquirad by •noviny tan f:3at. I think y�u .�i21 a7ra3
( tnat our plan a�d� valu2 to our ho�re while a shiftad ad�ition bra�ks it up
I �nd d�tracts fro�n tha oth3r� �oo:ns.
I hava �nclos�d the check for SoJ and �ha comalatad varianc3 requ'st fo��a
tor you� considaration. I undarstand that this raqu�st �yill b3 t�kan up �t
tha naxt board �naating and �ue �uill be notified of th.a dacision.
It you hava any_quest'ions� I can bv rea�a8hours�of 35�� andpSP`�obut�you3m�Y
�(y�rk). I a� u�u311y at wo�k bet�yeen th
��� 3ole to reach my mife at tha hora nu�nb3r. I would appre�iata any
:ntor�r,ation you couid suppiy.
^ Sincsrely:
; . �•�s
:_.�'> �,( �
. ��
. NE: �•
,
� ;,.tl 'dl _ /
.i : a ,� �� � 1
� � � � .` .:;� ; j � ��I #87 �
'��/� ,1 p R( V E ^_' xic�ard & Jane Franta
Cu�Y � r
, ; .��..
, e ,� ,
' , - � ti>j .�'' :" y;
.:� "�� ��v� � 3.�: , -_ _��;,-:,,
�l _ 4 � -' � � �.��r "
� .� ,�,..�� , tr.
- �i `:, � • : /n� --' I
•� �
9� ' , � ... . -
, . . .. : � . 'SD.' � . .
;�o . �R IV E • �
_ �: ,.
�) � i) >� ;,�
,,�) � �� �i' r �
� .►' i
�l�i �I
.�\y 4 •
� �')' ``�j ~:�f�,•
. q
(t� � �! �
y 5 �� � K
,e a �f
`ti�1 �� .. !'�
, �
,, — ,
' LANE
��'� � ��l ��, � ' '� ' ��s� . . .
� - � , � ` , �' „ 1
�i
(�� � . �� , W a B - -,r �L� ; - . ' � 1J
' � � ' `� �'
.� � .
� � � � ��" ' <
�� ,. ��� � Z 1� � - - �� - - - 'Q ' i�
� . F- � ' �
�------ N ' N . �
. l'�� . l.s� - , � � �o �i �''� � , i � � . _
,, � .�
., .
1A�z7J1L/r, � �'�
�A �
,� AUD�TQRS....�
�j; .�
; �r. ,� � ;
�—,_--
N0.
- �,; �1- ,
�--� �—
'� LOCATION MaP
�� _ ..
� _....—
' ? �J
�r�
• ,
�
if
t, t.
1
� E -� e .
�e� : a 1 ',� ....
� � �,�. . �...t .
s ,L
� . Q' ` "��S?� • «: �. � �
. "� . � .'"c . k. . . .
� � ..� �, � . �..
i!'
Y.� �l $ ` . . . .,���;. ' � .
p �' ...�.� � � " � � , � , . � � � ~ • }
�l ` v � ' . - ,� .
� tn �'� � . � k. :' J .
.� , �
,
. � . � �`��',. . � {?.
�A�F. � ; �� . _.. . --�, ... - _ . . . .-. .._.. _ . _ ..'J'a`��..�'7
� . .. �. � � ,--�".,, , _ . . � .
. . � —' , . .. . ; . .
,�"." m � � . �4 � . . . . ,
. . . . r . - . . - � F . '"a � � �". . .
�
. � - �. �.'��~�
,
+r. S';
�
� t
'-� l �
� � ,'v:!� ��i�j " � � � � . :� . ...
. �y �.!�ri 1 � � � . .. �'� L
f�
y� t';� 4 p ('� j' ' f.�
�.��� , �� ,�� . •
'��y � � y�, ,� .' tf ..rtE�:. '�, , a °'+ ,r:, �
,.T'�'ab �` . N <g� �l+ ,l .� 9 �� 4` . �` } .
�!� ' �Y.: � r I� 4 T/e t_ L' 6�
�.; . , . .. r .. . il.
. r i�
; ''s ��
' 2 �..-
�� F���^� ,�+ ,
*,,r
• �
'�`
�.� — � _
� . �:
,�
� '�t� .� _ �
3
�
Z
�
�
_
�
N
�
z�
��' `.f i` ��
�
..
� � �
Y
3
�
m
�
�
•�,
1
�
O
�J
0
U
�v
�
t�1
N
�
N
1
vA.� # s�-is 1 0 O
Richard & Jane Franta
✓i '
w
� �
� 7
�
U� 7 �
Z ¢ �
� 9`
... �
�
�
�
���
_�
3
Q
�
�
�
�n
�
Z �---�
�� �'~"�J �J
�
� � �
� Y
�
o #�
�Q
�
�
a . -
� o �
� � �
v
�Y
v� #a�-is 1 0 P
Richard & JarLe Franta
�
� �
� �
0
�
cC
c1
i��
�
�
1 I
;
��
�
c�b
�
�
�
o�
o�
�.
�
3
$
2
�
4C
�
�
� �
� �._..�� ...�.1, �. .r
� -
�s � �r
N �
g o �
v �
z
�
� .
�
a 9 �
�
� # 8�-�8 1 0 Q
�i.Chard & Jane Franta
�
�
�
v
s
o�
�
3 �'
0
� �
u°� �
�c �
��
��
� � J
� SY V
�
S� �
��9
�
�
�
I)
_�
APPEALS COtIMISSION �1EETIt�G, HAY 26, 1
PAGE
10R
MOTIOt� by t�r. Barna, seconded by tdr. Sherek, to recommend t ty Council approval
of variance request, VAR �87-18, by Richard and Jane Fr a, pursuant to
Chapter 205.07.03, 0, 2a, of the Fridley City Code reduce the required
side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet, to a the construction of
additional living space on Lot 2, Block 2, van flills Addition, the same
being G251 Rainbow Drive N.E., Fridley innesota, with the following
stipulations:
1. Ti�ere be no openings ' he west wall of the addition that would ,
be closer than 20 , from the existing structure to the west.
2. A certified la survey be obtained before the issuance of a
building pe�nit.
Upon a voice vo�e, Barna, Sherek, Savage, and Vos�voting aye, Betzold voting
nay, Chairpe'rson Qetzold declared the motion carried.
s"/
�•1r�tzold stated this iten would go to City Council on June 15.
3. C0�lSIOERATION OF A VARIA�iCE REQUEST� VAR #87-19, BY JE�I��Y �'ILEY, Pl►RSUAPIT
TO CHAPTER 205.01.03. D. 3a. OF TfIE FRIDLEY CITY CO�E TO REDUCE��_ R�EAR
SE/1S0�1 PORCH I�dTO LEGAL CONFORt•1ING USE ON LOT 2, BLOCK 1, RICE CRFEY, ESTATES
SECOND ADDITIO�V, THE SAt1E BEIPIG 1531 WOODSIDE COURT, FRIDLEY� P1INtJESOTAs 55432.
MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to open the public hearinc�.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Qetzold declared the public
hearing open at 8:23 p,m.
Cf�airperson Qetzold read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADP�IIP�ISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
1531 ti•�OOOSIDE COURT N.E.
VAR #87-19
A. PUQLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREME�JT:
Section 205.07.03. D, 3a, requires a rear yard setback of not less
than 25 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirer�ent is to provide rear yard
space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood.
Q. STATED NARDSHIP:
"After �y husband was diagnosed with leukenia, we decided to build
the porch to avoid bug bites which will result in an infection.
He di ed i n F1ay 18, 1985. "
10S
APPEALS C0�1�1ISSION 11EETI�JG3 NAY 26, 1987 PAG_E 9
C. ADf1IP�ISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
The petitioner added a porch onto the rear of their dwelling without
first obtaining a building permit. The porch extends to within
approximately 14 feet of the rear property line. City Code calls for
a mininum of 25 feet between the rear lot line and the dwelling. The
purpose of this variance now is to bring the property up to code. If
the Board approves this request, staff recor�mends you stipulate that
the petitioner insure that erosion to the north does n�-t increase over
present levels.
Mr. Clark statedthe addition was built in 1981. The petitioner's deceased
husband contracted a carpenter to help him build the addition. For sor�e
reason, tfiey did not take out a building permit. The City didn't notice the
addition until they were looking at the lot to the rear vihere there was a
variance request a couple of weeks ago for a garage.
r1r. Clark stated the petitioner has noa� remarried. She recently sold the
house and there are new owners in the house. The new owners a�ere also in the
audience.
P1r. Clark stated there �ras a partial cul-de-sac in front of the lot �vhich
meant tlie house i�ad to be built closer to the back lot line. The house
before tiie addition was 26 ft. off the back lot line. Ne stated the .
petitioner liad brouglit in several pictures of the property.
t1r. C1 arl: stated the structure 1 ooked al ri ght. I � ti�1as aesth����ir,�l ly pleasi ng;
but if ttie petitioner's request was denied, the structure would have to be
re�ove�i at the expense, {�e believed, of tiie petitioner and v�hich would probably
cause great grief to the neY� owners who bougl�t the house with the room already
constructed.
t1s. Jenny Riley stated this had come as a big surprise to her as siie had just
closed on the house the day she was notified that the addition was in violation
of city code. She stated her late husband was good at building and remodeling.
She did not get involved with it, and she did not know the addition was put
on witi�out a building permit.
t�1r. f4ike Serie stated he was the new owner of the property. He stated this
also car�e as a great shock to them. The way the yard was enclosed,he did not
think the three-season porch was aesthetically unpleasing to any of the
neighbors, and there did not seem to be any objections to it. They would like
to see the variance approved and the porch remain in place. The porch was
definitely a selling point for them in buyin� the house.
Dr. Vos as ked t•1r. C1 ark ►vhat was meant about the:. erosi on i n the staff report.
Mr. Elark stated he believed the folder for this property had some past
history �vhen the house was being built about some erosion. This was before
the vegetation grew in. To his knowledge, there was no erosion today. There
10T
APPEALS COt•11�ISSION MEETING, P1AY 26, 1987 _PAGE 10
was a retaininc� wall between the two properties and as lonq as that wall was
maintained, there should be no problem.
P�OTIO�� by �1r. Barna, seconded by �4s. Savage, to close the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, Chairperson Qetzold declared the public
hearing closed at 8:35 p.m.
��Ir. Ba�r�a stated the hardship had definitely been established because the
ar�dition �vas seven y�ars old and was built by a person who was now deceased.
This was no fault of the new a��ners of the property nor the fault of the
previous oviner who was the wife of the person who built the addition. There
has been no objections expressed by the neighbors. The addition was nice
looking. There was an extreme encroachment into the rear yard, but he thougi�t
the layout of the yard and the front yard setback on the cul-de-sac only left
about a 60 ft, deptfi on the western lot line, so he would have no objection
to granting the variance.
Ms. Savage agreed. She stated obviously there was a serious present hardship
and that was that the porch would have to be remaved if the variance was not
granted. She felt the spirit of the code was being met by the size of the
adjoining lots, and there was certainly plenty of green space. She would agree
to granting the variance.
Mr. Sherek stated he had a hard time with this variance request. Ne could
understand the new buyers' interest in the house because of the three-season
porch because that influenced the purchase of i�is present house which has a
three-season porch. He realized that the hardship was demonstrated for the
new owners and that in other circumstances, he would be totally in favor of
this. The City Council has made a definitive statement about construction
without permission for variances and without permits; and even though he
was in favor of granting the variance, he would vote "no" in order for tl�is
to go to the City Council for their consideration and final decision.
Dr. Vos stated he had no obj ection to the variance.
MOTION by P1s. Savage, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recor�mend to City Council
the approval of variance request, VAR #87-19, by Jenny Riley, pursuant to
C�iapter 205.07.03.D, 3a, of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the rear yard
setback from 25 feet to 14 feet to bring an already existing three season
porch into legal conforming use on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates Second
Addition, the same being 1531 tJoodside Court, Fridley, Mn., with the stipu-
lation that the property owner ensure that erosion to the north does not
increase over present levels.
Upon a voice vote, Betzold, Barna, Savage, Vos voting aye, Sherek voting nay,
Chairperson Qetzold declared the motion carried.
P�r. Betzold stated this would go to the City Council on June 15.
_ __ ____
. � � . ° � r `� sn � s e. ,zt .. _ � �,•�.i� ��
' � � � ���
' .. -=° s� ,-� �< � �e�� i> ��9
'I:
c�� �'�'� �' o) �p ��'� (,'!►� (�� � g�o) � ,: c ,� •, �,�
j1� �i06qi �r�,� t ��� (9/G� .'9x) i8z� �i � �� :' ��%
9 7 ' � w� E� �
� C��� i � � � � ��
I � `�`% ly��l
I � � �n� \ t �i
s�.r� I � � 4. .Y/ � �
iPO. flMf 3 ,^ �
� . �37� l.� C�) , ��
$a <i ooJ Goro) �940/ � (� 4 � C�
iq � �s�� �
'j� ,, � o %irrre//l�
�� ,, y 6 ¢ � o r�e,fM �
il'si�rri� �
� � C�
�s
;s • e �r ir , s .
, ;,-rn� �.v r vi��
;
.:�t,;,� � 10U
� , j:� �L #s�-i9
a� `,,,� � nny Riley
_� , �� c
'� j `t ,,a1 s ,,.v•,iy ss ,,v
� f• /G ,-y . , -7? ��
�
t� �` ��� - �
�X. � ' �` , �;�e .. �,� � S �T a +1►� i±�
Rl�,� •�'L�'� ' �/7 r �y, . /�F .Ma� �.t�1 :�7 `, `1j�
;/1 ./,� �' �: ��'i, .�•��� '� t
, ���ry= � ` ` � LA N E E.
� � ^ t • `f/i¢� � �I�.� � �
R �s�' li
`�� ��/�� �.. � �� � � , � �� �� ��� `�� i
.
. z � a� ' ,� . _. _.
� � . . �t�a►'.�'sf ir � f
� „� : , (l)
� 9 l�'� � � r �,
.�n ; � � 5
f�) ` �� '` 37��) �; �yBcJ � � `9d�
.�E"' ��� ; � _ - �,; a'� ``' I
Z" •�a ` — �
.�3.� - / �.'� � % � . l "�i � � � -� v�, ? . s �••r. • iiv � q� / f
� � ' � t (0 ///.vj o � � . / ; 2 t , �� 3 ` ,t , / ` (s,�
!'i) { �•' 9 � ?� Xe.i,li.! �- ��� k. I'j� � !oM
.ci,/w/
� ,t �H� � ��i "�aw�iv Oa/�iiA' ��� � s .a xav Cay,
� � ��, 3 ° � �� �'�"� �„�.� �� �r, �o,�
,�� ,r , � � c�� � � . �a� . � �,� ' cs� cnao;
� � '., � ° � , o k, o�rr
>_ e•le � iN) �. 3` S � � : � h �
� ,._ G d � :� - .. • • : f ' Zwj. a � f r'e °'', ti (
r/ W j. p'
� � ! ' l�J .� .�'�.Y� M �,y � � ♦ � ', . . ".: t
� � �
� �; t �i 1�'� R���� � 1 pj ��• xv ,`` s�; WOVV$� ltf.y T�
A� :oR,vE: � �� , �, � v � ��Z �� `� , r��#,� `,:�;;.y �,, ��, ;,�, 7
�� " ��� � �� .. ... .�"'� M CT. '� � � . �� \ p ,�� • f ,Z /
; � � Z � ` � .' a� . u
I --.�'�' 3'-'B � s z ' ; d(�� ,�,�� .� p. . e ,� � 2 •-
� � �_ � W t�,, � �� R �,,, ; t�.� �,,s �>, :,:.5;
//�� ! � • �7 � V 3'? S 6 . ..1 � B � . �
� ,t/7 r W � �� V � ♦ � [71) �� �,� N� ° +��'.
•� n� . � ��:.
V 1 A ��) �� ]C _ Q �, � �� �,a) � p �;�BRMR ` -�;�r '�.
' �C��dl / 1 /�'� � p � ,� •� .
�.� ' ' ��k
. �S . � � /�•� - •� � � = �.�.y � M4'w
� R IR; �., B� � ..,,�.=� ����� , �� �~�r �4��
•� �C � � °��c � �� t« �
�s' 3 tkJ � ���� .f � � a.a ' ss ,� ,. � � : .� $ �
..
* G � �, � � (�J �°� " �(� P� 2i� N) �xx� . � `
��1 �`! �rI ` p � � � � 2, : � 3; /1 �►)��,> �.� . ,"�
� 9 � � V � � � 3��� ' ��•«;:. �,a_ >..
,
h "' y �
.�� • ' • , � . �� ..
� * � � .a 3 M . /O . . ........ . .. �. <
C
s ,rd.p.iy,�; r�s NN /S �.0 '. 1 �
/ .� \ '� �.-�.
' / ` .,i�� . �vw►K•N+K rC i _�;_ {� �
lL�� l� � �4r � y �/ i ? � I.%'f% 4 � �
'� �`
���) 6 /O �� � �// PARA' � . �� �� � �/« �/i� r. Q.,:. � w
� !y) )
• /� I �in) � •: ( _ �ir -` �. t
r
i ..ti0-. ... .+, Sis Mw' �I .... � ; IL Z � IZ� � � PAAK ti �Si1 ,�� •C'vs �'�p ' �
� � .,,,,.,. ;�/� . _�. . ** �GC � C„� C�� le ti r ' � �Y
� � s Z = � :
G�) i �r , i � ''' I� �J /��z s r i
_ � ' \� J <f� � .. , , ; � � i�i � '' 1 '°�c ,, 1 „� �
J �+ ry� •.� - �
,'I�NO � ti ,a . . � ' , .rr� �r�r r.r .v-e� �r i '7 �(' � ' .
-� .
. � � �i ��i ��% �� . �M� /C! N-Zw . .
" . . 3 'P . �e ��� ��� , iN� � ' ' � r �
��, ' � ' 1'� • � � . � �� �� �� �C+l� y �� �r '.!I'ss" c�
0 22 : ; � Qp/ l0 . � 4...� �� 9 . ,e _ � z� � � .a�r � ,�'� � a�
3 •_ -s, � .,�.�.� ,� � . �
!_ U^ �`. � '�
�
_...... , , .
._ K! _.. _... ...
� �i y
.. - .. _. ...
� /y�K•N! � _... . .._ _. -. ... .....
� N•�I•tsir f2
, � .;�:-�§:��� - � LOCAT N AP �
. � -. . �
.: _ r � `
f� _ _ .
VAR #87-19 �
CERTI�ICATE OF SURVE��p P11ey �
_,
F�R T'in� iree Build�r:. Inc. •
-- .� -----�------- ----- - - - -- ------ _ — — t . ::
,
. �
i"
� �, i
��►, x f�,�', �-�- ' .
L�' t`� � '
.r— .
82 `-/: _
---------'-° ---s=�-
. .�� C
. —_, _
,s Iya � ; �
; + T
!� , i �
a', �_�µ �1 �
. . _ - Pa2ui .
S–�f-� �
` .;' ^, `�, 5'
_ 3 � - 1 a �-�r - •
- , � , �-
/ �.
!�: 51��,\ _
,-
/ � So2/�/0;```_ ..._ _�
5��0 - �- �,
40.82
.__�_ ��:WOOOSIOE COURT
��
�� � Dcr.o t.F� i ran r.��nu��r.t
De�cript�on: i.ot 2, Bloc�c 1. F'.ICF� CF.E�K
ESTATES 21iD ADDITION. Ar.oKa Count�•, A:inn.
ti: '
15 3� �ocw s,oE L,�� 27- . .
. . . :� � �. . �.
. ��
.... , ►.,i..,r.�
C%Ol�'Ii L`"� Coctnlrt� 1 hc��:l�y a�rhty ;hat th�s y J lruU attd .:�nr��t+ :•��tr,yrii:�►Iwn c�� .: cinv��y al
the I�ou��da� ��rs ut the abo�c' dex�ibed larul and nf ih•� la:atio, c�t a�► b�nl���r�q„ , 2�(O
if any, th�:�:on �nd oll vis�We zncroa�h��ents. it any. t�nm :�► o.� .:,�Q lentl
�-�u rue or� - •- -- _.. . .
� � �:�.,.,�. :�.,,}
t r r1 S'--nrey�n4 •$�te Pie��n�n:� As surt•�••���ti by rne th�s �3.�iL_ dav �t __._.�EP-�+ ---- • 19�
G�.�t [nq:nee��nr, "
. . ."�
_ ._..._.__- -
/�,� �
�,cir� )p... .�� t� �� 9d �l B�w�x Ac h.� _— ------------ --�--�%1.¢-^ru-�--..- =- !/C cvt'l - ... . S�•d�,
�d�o•,r��•n Vd�*. MfV S5r2$ , �� ' �
i�norn• 533 73CG ALnn. Reg. Nc� __ L��i _--
�...�_
. � , . , _ . .. ..��.., y -. r . t-.:�.. !aa �a. .. •
� � - _
, ,.
�� �a.. � r a � `:i
� ,� �r � .� > " 1 ' ,�' ; f ' , ,� ,�'�� � ' : v,'„ '" .,
� �^ ., E,� .d-s''�.,"' f ° ?y'° �` � r ,+9 � � f = �; � � � , ,� : �ay� a � . . � .
' �3K w �$ . "�' ,Yi � . 4.,{4 }Re` �+� s, '�.. �,� c qi� +� ' � }.� �
� F .� � i,� , t� � � _ � , hA � r � y 4
�� � ' � 1 � I�' M s� _ T,.7 �..�' y�� �., �v� h . 4 + y � �� . T�� � , �' . .
y� ..�r';?, M 6�. ' '4' � � T i ! � � yd ��� B 9. � �} �. � �s�� �.w4 ! r a > '� s�"�`w F,,,� j "° � k �Tr 'i' � ai � � .
,' �. �; j, v, !ie � ^n .. . � � l - . :
,
_ 'r�
.
4 $ •
.r..� .+ �� - � � ..
�� ���r � ' � '� ? Y �b:.x} � w f
-$ ' ,� ,�,, , «, v '� 4 w ' y � � � R»�. �` „,�� ^.:� ,� R 9 z � : �� „ `�
' x
� *, � �.� �° �:. * ' ° (� �: � � �_ .�� ^k. � .. , ,� • . �s �` . �, �; + � :
> ,
� '
, „ , . y .:.
lf�
F
i� o.r` .a ' I �� xp�'' . � ' �4 `S, Y`.
�. �,��,d;� �y � . tykF�," ��4 ����.� ' �Y;,��1 tiV� , R �� 4 ; . ._ ��,�q . . � �} .. ..
,�, y, „y�� ? �`i� "F. �+�j, � ; . � , �'y�, � w..� y :{�_'
- � �,� � "� � � � � �' � a� • �� z : i�"
�"',+�,� } � „ �° �r � - �, � _ ± • � , � M1r.�
:i�,,x ;` �-• ,��3� ;r � � ` !,.' . . , r' . ..� . ' ��.. _
�,
-p '�� "� �M � t - �b � ,•?$ e� .�
q � ,.
, ,, " � t �; ; K � .�,.� y«�e3:. .�.` .a a T '�''�` }� j° , ,� ;
.�y� ' '.. G,��l` � e- "M � � � � . 3y ° � �� +
� xt� � - ... . " A, ,- . __�,. y � ' ..
; _ � �_ �' � � �'.t� r�' � L {; , . . � �y( Y` ' �; �. ' ' S�" R ` `IM,i��;r,�}'4, � .
♦� f 3 .� � , . �q�'' �•� '•
�
� � >"� �k : � �� r } * �{ .^3e '� $"�wi���� � � ..
�r
a`3 ., `"F . , ' � � ? : r v � �' ° � �a 7k �: °
�� y��y�� .t�.� ...:+$� �. ,' � . �. t w.r'� x';ut° Sr z'3.' �• �i,( � p� - �� � r�- ..
•R '•" L� � •+�^ 3 �r.. s � *'x ,'!�«.�. 1,�y +o _ i- � ��.� 'lp ,p,, 1.
� „t '4�, � .�I • � ' �_ �m� " :F '�; ' t ��f` ,, .* ��" iv
�fPS c�' a� � �� � � t� � �� � . + ,�:_.
.
1
.
x.
� +i
� �at' Lar • '� � 9 *�: s ,,'.'�r:
�� , � �
'� �' 4'$: , � +� _ r� �� � � � �'^ . r �1 � ; f' t. � `; �T � ' : '("".� �` '�, � �' ' ' � -
�fk'; . `-� ' ' �' �" f. - �t�i� k '1�p „T, i` � ''+Y * �, z
� .� . �' �. ._ �^ � � `� .+iF.�.: ' 'a,�. _ a� �� � ���+.A '� �� � . 1¢� �
y.� �,� '�"y. ,`T: � e< .a �'F�' �:}.�� � .�.8 � y� �' ,"ir+ yr o . .
. v � � � �-"` -
� �~�: wZ � _�a >
Lt . � «;i � ' f .?'
:�' {�a�+`. a � " "; S r. t�R.,1 �, �f x�� . �.R "y ��` 'i'' x: .
� �t � . , .�A : �w ■�� ♦ Y� . � i k .4�� � .
}'� N� }e � � • � `.:~ �iRf � I x� }"� � � JI � h� i � . .� � h : �ix{
. � � � � ` �. � ^ � 1� � �
.i �. � Il ' -: ...t sK ��' .r �` • , F �
3 ��^ � � ^ �. �� � f Yy .
�Ic �12 1. ,i.�ja.�.. � 5� �t ,i �: 7 ;�` _ � � .
.. �' �1� � �. � t� i ti'� �� 'bY ���� »..
'h :' Y ��*' . ! � R .. �� � � `4��, 4 �4 �4 , Y _ ' �` (
+
. . .w
i i. z W
r
� , .'i'�y .� 3`� �1.. � � � i _ . �W �� �� + � �h� "�y� j � �y. ", ' � � '� ..1 �
�� g � » # � '"�°�,-' �' � �y������i � � �'��,� �. _ i' . � � �� .
«
d' � � � � s � '+� , �
'� * � r .'�, '`4� � ,�'' " ! . � kx , � � ;� '�r' 6� �
� °� ` ,� g �, ,� '� �� � .s� �
� �� ��` <�� ` '*' �' '� � . j� �� ` ~ # x�n M� . ��a � ' a�'' _ *�� �� 1
wr ��' #x ` . ,fi.: ' �}'1 ' �`�' :'!'r{ , � , ? .
� xa� � ��"'�". ' . f, � . .' s f�-" � p :. A . �.�1 .�,�`. '� ..-. .,; Y+�' 'y}' y�� a � .
- ., �. kk a �-�'�* �� .� •
� -� � � . . .. � 4 . � � .� � fi. � ��lF�}c f .'�" a�• t�s,.�'� 7 `� M 9 `� 1� +�Y
� _ `� tyr � � ,., - . S�� •� � ' . � � .: a . - �i .- � y il� '�� � ;rF {'� �' * y,�i� '�'fi ...
.a.p� �[ i fi. : �;7�' .y`. 9 ae. � t .s"_ . $ � _ 1 .
4� ; ? � � �i'.Y;�'� � } �:a " - ''�., , a� � a ''� �:� ^'t,�}�'s ~ .: ��w �..,,,i��
t��- . . . p. + , x� . . . " _� y ,,� . „!1 �F i1 � '�� S 4 f' 'E
1 '�'?.. r.., . '���s�'il�.1�. c • r'i n'�a^, � +�l'�s�;'� -�y.'9 r:; r��,'.,� �..,�y �m�. �`'44��.
i � N'� t �� '+ ' *t �, -;«�^� . e . � ,d yaj; *.iR� � f � ",'L[ �� T '' � ,
� . •
,� � �.. '� i ,. . - . .: . . .,... � � '�„at . 4� } - .'! y,'�.,- . �{ � '�' 'ti :� '
. , . � . _, , • :. � ;. e . . '! iy ' ., .
� , � �
�,. � � r - - , n �� ,,.. s . �. x �=d i.�� � � � � . y�.
�S'� � . . .� - t�" �.�. :,� +�r *i+;• .� !° {S t _.� ?7 � Y.. � k�
ti;.� � � , � #' .r- � '.a _ •i s 4,4 .1i'�( j ; . �
. � � � �,
_ � .� L ' }� 7� . j " _ Y G R9 � . ' i �. Y
� � ! �6�-� ,,.� s"� � a� a : "''° �� v ,� r - } J j'� , � : ��,'.
"lG�+'ti& ' ~ ° o >� `9t�,t1 ir ��1.. � .�� :�ctE. ,�`'�' t �. �� �` �.�;�
�
� �
g� 'F,a+
f�.
. - '�
� . `+ �' �
�°��� ��
i F �k t
����'- �
�- .
�:� '.'.�'r . i; � r a
s
fti '
� �x' �,
� �
��� �
�
��" +r �g r. . ��
� � :
�, � k
��� � �
��'c . ��i�:�
�.w .; � � w
�r '�.yz� . '� � . . � .. .`�r�'
4�„;i �ifR f t � P�• f �`� . . � {�� '3
t�;��'?iA,�t,� ° j.. , �,�
*� ��y � ` ��� °� � �, � i�'�"'�.
�, �+Gt�� �"'` >�' q� " � '
�� �iJ"`�^y y� , - � _ t,. .. . �.,.. t� , .;i'i�.
�{'�����. 'Y•�.(�Y'� � r"'Ke 't ... . . -jr yp .ar�. a:, ��.�1.
� �
�w
�.,�, ��;� y �� ,."*�, ,.
�'` '� * '� � •• h aG �r- „� � �s
. � �` �� . _ .. . . , • �� fs j�` R . t �'Iy�X'�.: �
�` l� �, � .�h �. � �'" �: ?F. �� �� . -�� . . r * � � �„-'r,'� �'+'
�,.,'f"•'�'=�d �'� x"' �" �• "'' , . w�� �ct.
* , � 4 ��i. .A+� �
,� � � � si ,�. .» ' .. �>° . . ` ,�:*.t , �?�
M9-'�.. a-� ; ,7 '�, 6:
� ` � i � �, � �,` .
��� .� '., i , �`�,
,. <�. r ��� � �,. ` '•�-� •_ &° � �`
S, . . �.. �.�+wn�!�'ti. '� ; i!}.w
�w
« � °. i:. .. +1.'.F s.t � Y
q�zj +3 ' i�
j� , � MZ4sy+'q�'�I
_ ' . ����.� ��
o � � � t
�1 y�
� � � + • • dt'� �^y��y��f y, .
r � �i
� 4
��t :� .. s , � � r '� . k. � ��. • � .
��,��+��'', q �� . ` � � `� � Y
�4� - x �•
,a � � � �r�� ��. ,�'�4
.
� PLANN
ING DIVISION � �
_
MEMORANDUM
cinroF
f Rl DLEY
!� ZO: Jim Robins�n, Planning Coordinator
!+� F'ROM: Daryl Morey, Planning Assistant�
I�ND Oi�TE: J�ne 10, 1987
FtflGA�ING: Varianoe for IIA Dzgineering, 7770 Rar�chers Road N. E.
IIA �gineering is proposing to construct a 1010 square foot addition to
thei r property at 7770 kanchers Road. With this addition, the lot coverage
for the site would be 46.5$. 40$ lot voverage is allaaed by �de.
II�0 �ngineering was granted a variance in 1983 to increase their maximum
allawabie lot ooverage to 45.5$.
At their May 26, 1987 meeting, the Appeals Commission recammended appraval of
this variance with the following stipulations:
1. �e north p3rking lot be striped.
2. The chunpster located on the south side of the building be fully
screened.
3. The petitioner work with Staff and neighbors on an appraved drainage
plan.
M-87-135
�
10Y
APPEALS CO�1f1ISSI0N MEETIPIG, t1AY 26, 1987 PAGE 11
4. CO�ISIOCRATIOPJ OF A VARIANCE REQU__E_ST3 VAR #87-20, BY ELO ENGINEERIP�G - BELT
LIPJE COMSTRU� N C MPANY, PURSUAN� �0 CHAPTER 205.18.3, C, la, OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO It�CREASE THE P1AXI�1Ut1 PERCENTAGE OF A LOT ALLOIJED TO BE
COVEREU BY TH MAI�� BUILDItlG AtJD ALL ACCESSORY BUILDIPJGS FROP1 40q TO 46.5%
ALLQW HE C S RtJ IOP� OF ADDI IOfJRL Pl.AP�T SPACE ON �OT 3, B OCK 3, E ST
RA(�CH ESTATES, THE SAt1E BEING 7770 RA�JCHERS ROIID, FRIDLEY, t1IPJtJESOTA, 55432.
MOTION by P�Ir. Barna, seconded by ��1s. Savage, to open tt�e public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson a�tzold declared �i�e public
hearing open at 8:40 p.m.
Chairperson Qetzold read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADt1INISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
7770 RNVCNERS ROAD
VAR #87-20
A. PUt3LIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREt1ENT:
Section 205.18.3, C, la, requires that the maximum percent of the area
of a lot allowed to be covered by a main building and all accessory
buildings when it is a one-story building is 40% maximum.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide aesthetic
parking, open landscaped areas, and to limit congestion of industrial
areas.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"Tl�e building needs the additional square footage. It makes the plant
more efficient in its floor plan."
C. ADPIINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIE4�:
This property is located west of Ranchers Road and north of 77th Ave.
In ]983, the petitioner was granted a variance to increase the iot
coverage for an industrial building from the maximum of 40� to 45.5�
to allow a 9,000 sq. ft. addition. The petitioner is now propos�ng a
1,U10 sq. ft. addition that will fi11 in open space between two exist-
ing buildings. The proposed addition will increase the lot coverage to
46. 5%.
If the Appeals Commission reco�nds approval of this request, Staff
requests that you stipulate that the north parking lot be striped, that
the dumpster located on the souti� side of the building be fully screened,
and that the petitioner work with Staff on an. approved drainage plan.
10Z
APPEALS C0�IMISSIOPJ t1EETI��G, P1AY 26, 1937 PAGE 12
11r. Clark showed pictures of the property showing the various elevations and
landscaping. It was heavily landscaped along the south and the east. I�e
stated when he was at the site that day, he did not notice any on-street
parking so he assumed there was no parking problem.
Mr. Jin Sackrison, Qelt Line Construction, and Gene Owczarcak, Elo Engineering,
were in t{�e audience.
t1r. Sackrison stated this addition would give a better flow for the factory
and �varei�ouse. It proLably should have been asked for when they requested the
variance before, but it tvas not and noNi they really need the use of tlie land
as part of the warehouse. Fle stated Elo Engineering has a very nice building
an�1 keeps the area very nice. Ile stated the same would be done with the new
ad�iition,
�1r. Betzold asked if Elo Engineering could foresee any future need for even
inore space.
i1r. U�czarcak stated that it ��as just the type of ►rork they are in. They are
now into larger parts which take up r�ore space so they are constantly Moving
parts around to get from one area to another. It got to be very difficult so
they �aere looking for more storage space as they are going to shelf that space.
Mr. Betzold asked if the petitioner had any problem with any of the stipula-
tions suggested by Staff.
P4r. Sackrison stated he did not understand the drainage stipulation. They do
have a storm se►ver on one edge of the property.
t4r. Clark stated he saw no reason for that stipulation either. He stated he
was on vacation and had not prepared the staff report.
P�r. Barna stated he assumed it was added because of the 1983 r�ention of the
drainage.
�ir. Qetzold stated the drainage situation s��ould be looked at by City Staff
to see if there really was any concern.
t1r. Owczarcak stated if they do not get tfiis variance, they will have to
start storing outside. That was not a good situation because they have sheet
metal parts that rust when stored outside.
h1r. fiarris stated he o►vned Lots 5 and 6, alock 2, East Ranch Estates. t�e
stated he could probably give a little information on the concern about the
drainage. �J{�en the addition ►vas put on in 1983, the roofing contractor put
t��e drainspouts and rear scuppers on the back of tt�e building. They had a
1 i ttl e troubl e wi tli nateri a] s►��ashi ng fror� El o's pl ant across the parki ng
lot onto other properties. f�e stated they have not had nuch of a problem
nav because things have settled down because of the vegetation. If anything
was going to be clone witl� the drainage, he stated he would like to be con-
sulted on the remedy before the City does anything.
10AA
APPEALS C0�1t1ISSI0P� MEETI�dG, t1AY 26, 19�7 PAGE 13
�tr. Harris stated he did not object to the increase in lot coverage for
Elo Engineering. He stated Elo does a good job, is a good neighbor, and is
an asset to the cor�munity.
�r. Vos stated he had looked.at the property and could not see where there
would be a drainage problem.
Mr. Clark stated he did not think this addition r�as going to affect anything,
but there might be a problem that should be looked into.
�1r. Qetzold stated Staff, the petitioner, and the neighboring property owners
should get together to resolve any possible drainage problems.
P10TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by 11r. Barna, to close the.public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the public
hearing closed at 8:55 p.m.
Dr. Vos stated when he looked at tiie building, he thought Elo Engineering
had one of the nicest landscaped areas that he had seen in this area in a lonq
time. Another 1� loss of green area was not going to hinder the developr�ent
in the area. The addition would cause a natural flow from one building to
another, and he would have no objection to the variance.
his. Savage stated she had no objection to the variance. Siie stated she lool:ed
at the property and felt the property was very pleasing to look at and very
well landscaped. Tlie variance for 1% more lot coverage �vould not chan�e that.
��Ir. Sherek stated this looked like a very good plan.
Mr. Qarna stated the code was basically being met. The sr�all increase in lot
coverage would not make any difference, and the property where the addition
would go was not presently used anyway. The building was presently in an
area where there was a large nun�ber of "zero" lot line structures, and the
hardship was defined in the inability to carry on anci maintain a safe and
efficient business without additional space.
Mr, Betzold stated he also agreed.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recorr�nend to City Council
approval of variance request,. VAR #87-20, by ELO Engineering - Belt Line
Construction Company, with the stipulations that:
l. The north parking lot be striped,
2. The dumpster located on the south side of the building be fully
screened, and
3. The petitioner work with Staff and neighbors on an approved drainage
plan.
Upon a voice vote, all voti�g aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the motion
carried unanimously.
10BB
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 26, 1987 PAGE 14
Mr. Betzold stated that this item would go to City Council on June 15.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to adjourn the meeting. �pon
a voice vote, all �roting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the May 26,
1987, Appeal s Corr�ni s s i on meeti ng adj ourned at 9:00 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
�
c;7���Y��
Lyn aba
Recording Secretary
:, `
i ,¢ � , � p � �,
:;
_ � ���2 [j]j� ��7- ��� C
1 j,7� .•J"h � � IZ'.'1 00 �;��il� •
� .' ' � ' "' "" "��ELQ _ ing ti.
�� s zz) v�I n� 7140 ` �,.; � ti.
�
i � a .,' �.. ,
. �
:; � '� a : o G� s ; �
! a �ti 7 (zi� � , i 5 ,, . ,� r •;••. .+ � �
) , � � � � ; (/;) � �. ` �
.:s�s��s.►� i 7910 � ; 6 ,•'�+� �i �
i =°,- w s . . Q
� .r�o . � � � , ;
� I ' �'t� or T. r �o ao �1f �1 � r�s
I 1� U ,v91 t.r �/.v' , 3
1 I � �r i ,• �
�
� t � 9zz > , ' �
� � '� ^ a� ^ �� r�� �;� :' � L�� :' , �
� � � (1'1v4J �: ' ° g C��% � C' P 6 "` � "v.� � 2 / � ' � "+�
� I �r A'�te Cte►r .Iiswti.res L , y ` �,,,�
! � �ODA�. I �✓.. 3:J - �1 ✓� 1 �' 7q�G �
� � �� \
� � <. _ ^ -1�' -F;� . . -
i r� J � �? -- ' {%k ` it .. .�..•. i •
I - � .^t, ,. �%c/` c fiIS6 .,�� J I10I/ s.�E —� __ �.!I.v• � '�ii{� -.�: at - � � !.
. . �i.✓.+ •. � — '_ '_
�
•o oL , �1 � t .� . , . t ,
�q �y;j �g 5.1j"�tli v +�c - tiy��a� , � ,
'-� � 695 � g g0 -� j �y) ar a�. �` 7 870
� 7845, �g2o -7aeg`�� � + l��/
:.
, Z�) (4� o °� Y / r�
� * � � � � l`�
O
�' " ,� ", 7 d7�3� � - h-
"� ;
� ��f,� � � . , �
I .ii✓ .avOf.dwt✓1�►F ' �+ v
�._v. T E �� -��+ I
�_., _�c ..� A �- �
v a .r m i► s sts�r+ w+y S� '� �
'!J
� g as .,-. • ,�- . o � Y
�, � Z
� 3 �, �N k2� �.:, o�
a � � �
� % %� � .z cf> � J � ,� �3) � _ , �
�o �� �"� � � � ( O �8» : �, � � O
� �•{ , �Qas o) � - �
' ;.
r A ^ <�� �
E A ��� __ _
,,,� �.., _.�
;� � �: : ,
� �:f;::;::��::::::�:�:��:. � � � � � : ,
� ;;::•::� I ;, .� � � �t -�---
•:il!s:;; � � '`o �
�. ' ��' ';: �.i,��,'•�,.:•'r'r:•'r: } �� �
� '%;;:'�..,...,...•.•r.•:.• � ` �
h g � M ( � » 0 �
a 6�„� �:::::�:;::�..: h g) 3
� •ti;:: ::;:,;;; � ���
:.ti:;�::�: ', � � y 3 � �� �
779s .;�;:;,; � � + �i �`, ti
��ti:�: ::::=:� ,..,, � o ,; 6 �
, : ...: :. ... � . � .- T :,
...• ..: y�.;:;::;:;
.:::�:�:::ti :;.:..; ::'' �. � : � �. ,� 7 t o +
':;:;:�::�:•.•'::•.��;:•.:;..: � � 1
-7103 . ��''��' t ;I,I i s-1'(�) Ft-
::��:•:•:::�.;.• I � , � '�
�� °� �:::: ::�i:��:: 7 7 33 ( • � �.1 : �
s Ce> ;::::�:::r:�::::::::��::::: s � / ��! �� e, � ' µ.'
� ` S'�' �:•::{:;.,'•.•��; ('� •� +J 7 DO 'a
::=:�::• ' ' � 7° 3 I : r.��� (�) .
•:�:� •�:� �:� ��: :;��:; ; s�.�o. . �
••'�•�;:ti:;` �••• iO� � � 1DilN,✓•/N ,:�
a �
.Z, 4 1
'° _.�;, }::�:•:.{;::<j�?�. ' e,� ��ti� � . ;��
�' h e ` i�
' ' -' !� �I,� ��n ?cso : �--
S.W. CORNER �''s,�'�'"'' �, .__ ..�.. w..�, �
SEC. 2 !
33 ,---.
� " t � � � �_'Y. �i. .�', p � ' , '',�. .i.� �. ,s �' � �� . , � ��� F '�
�e ., � � _.�} ' !!Y � . Mhi A „ � � j 1 �� �t . 1 � � '
. " • t l, � . .. ' - .. Y ,r
`�. J
� v
. ��
2
.< � + � : '�: � � .
�
'E. � t �`�• � '�`� � � �"
� .� ,� ;� :�,-��,;� -.�n �;. .. , , ,., . , . �
1 - .. �� ♦� �.�" i`e7 �.k� .t' �� � ' p
, . y ...- , • �5%�� � ; 'fA, �,d.� °� { - � �
�q'.��7'... ;�C«S'�':: _� '. . � " . . r-...<. �.rz� rL�t9sK��.u�� `��"�41f41?�.t+'�C" � ...±Ft;,c• .�4.34� :. . . , _ .'j� .
� Ue.�� �c: �1
• L ,� . 'NXivr� ^"�� +L.M�'�_T_'r'�� i . rY��"-.;:IL� 1S`'4..f �"��=v.�a���ti'r-.�.j� t!!
• ':..,�{ �'� �, � .i.�' i. . -�v T.v�: �+T� •"�- �. r'C `-� �3..,��'r'w�4o,♦
{�.r: . � .,� � j ��'��• �`( 4 . ,���f��tl� at � �`tf ^.,.
� � ' �T ��� 4. � .�i .,� ��,Y� �, �J •'��ir a ;rys�� � - ��
� +�� s,� � R � n �e r "' +q ss� ' t, "� r -° ° c'� � � ±
� yr y�� ,�,' ;n .�, y:� . ;�,�•�, � �,`: ,�`
.. t s�; . M '�,""#,'""�v,,,,.
� �: �. �� r �+n .. � r �. : �� � +r` : s. . � . �.,� . �!' ,y.
♦q
'F j t �.. `'" .� ' �� ^ - � , i�', u� yr�F'y,,y 1 r � � '�t„� -... � � y,",,
� �'. .. ,.s. �� a�.-� k; ♦ ��' ta.��,��u. nw�
� ''%`'�.. � t'�., � � %s�. :��� '�'.i'4. � �+ .
�� .t.� �-� •d'�� � �.'�.f. � �d.
��� � � � g � �, ,�� � '" '�'
,i�� ��' , ,,���, �` r.��y
�.Y 3�G ,' ,��P �� y ` . ♦ 3 �.
, ,
. :
r... �� ;. . a . -. .
.. . � ": . V . ,: � "
. . , . � —
W � y�y��
y 5 . «p. : ,
� � � 't:� � "t . ; :�.�. �eL�w�rt'' ���' ��'��i7�� : '•' 7�.�'!-��f�.�,�q
, ,, � �; ��y,'.4� �,. � Nf �t` �lll �!i i��
� .Ar`'i+i `*�'.' � . .6 � '+ � . � 7 • .�*(��. � " ,�„�_� ,s�
; , , � , . � , �.�••� � � � ; � iI; r)f��i�`i ��"e���'';�',,,* � �
J ` ��{ `�6 " -,� �� � � �,'�' �33� '$:�:n�il�lti�)fLli.�lii;l�jti( ?
�rs�'�4� ��..."i 71� • Si� � ���. ' .—I . . .�a� ���`+���^\� '� '.�i
.��- ,t �� ' �.. ��f +.e ;_�. 4 �. Y }• � ��
i r „e.+- is � . r T k+. � r' � f!
{���,- �� � � ����� h� , <:
T i..1 '�_� . k
. Y „� w�� ��`� � - 1� � •�r1f �1
� �ay �
' - f'':. . a Y �, � �i.' '� � . 1`' t _ � -,�. +w � �! � , `''�
1
� °;4 .� i- , � ii! ��+;�' .",� sf � . ♦ ,i'� . � • � ,. ! � .�.. • � i
�FO '�:� A '�� I,
� , ti. + '�'':' 1 � � "r'� 4' r , :'$ ' • • �
'.ii,v,� � `�i ��� -'±�s, v� ��.`��tX+F �� � � � `.�� �_ � .�• `' I •
, �,"j'�"_.�W .,,yy�a - .:^t S.. . .:' � � . "� .�+�t,:�� - , .. _ �f�� . : � €!r• .
.�`� , �a �f ����� � q�"��" � . f ��y k����M� w i'
' �r '��,• • � � ° �~ T,(� -
���� �.1�^� } ' , i � � � y' .T..'�+��- �•�� 's� .t r
f: > f� . �' ��� �r, �� � -�' �� -. � �� .4r -.� w � e ��
; ..' ,Y� sy,p,� .,,�,� � ..��'!"'(�y� 4 ,� `, , �:t � � ' .�e. '��2,r�",,. �.. T� '.'.�'�
�a _
�.:Y Y�II !� �k � � y��f l. , fy ,.. [' , � t,?. . . w.,�R,�,�. . � �P �
{ , j `� � i _ � S 'tik . Ys *. � t. � +a *
� � �� o� ..� �a�� ��! et�y� �
,q�. .> �.kf : .,� L.l.'^ �R � � ] ��'�
J � „t �� .y ,
�r� '�. � _ '' ` r x�,4° .�"-.�� ' . � �
�� � . �T� , �'' � ��.y+'4 F + � �� �,
+ '�� '� • ' � .. y,. �.�`c w� . ' ' 1 ' - � .:
-;' :''�,�, t� # `�.' � ' ^ ,.; a'�-•�-F _s' N," ''�" : : ,n. #�'
, , , t .r . , • -.• , � +�` .T .. � �: �
. +` , �,�-' , . • - � }
� -M � ` 1 . , ,• .t : �.., a ,�
�„ ' ' ?� - . �a- � _._ �, `',� �' - �`� �',�. `, � _ �;.
� �, � 4 1 # .���-. ; �. �' �.3_ °; � ��
. T %i'° .� a i i
. .-�ivi�"" � � � �i '� �� ` iry�►'� � f �'�' '•�;� .� •4�� �
, "�� � , � � � _� 4_ �
� �5.i. "{, r� �y1f�l i -i��. .���l�*���e ��i` ).,,ro7�. ..�.� � .{ �
. � . ., �.i ,,:,�r M.
: _,. ,�._��. �' ., . .
�' � I'' ', f � ` � , ,�.
� � .,t �y�, {�.� , � � �, � � .� � � � 'a � �� j
# ,
., .
. . y � . , • , �.
� .. ..*.p . � '' _ .
.
c,. , .
.s' �� �� i„ a T �' •4 � �,qh�.'�{ �r.. ��,• � } � ' y . ._
���4f.i. ���`>��✓. �S� . , 'F.._ ....t..s . �:, F. • •7,. . :. � . ' 4 - y��� :
���/R7�Cf.�:�� � • • +
.... . ',,,. . . F �- � � � C . i�
, , , . � a � ' ��,�, i
; -. . ... ,, :: � ..�.:
, _� s � f
i. .... C�'��$��. � � o.. ..aJ�_. .. .
,,,�� 7y• � ;� � ' � i k+' .� �� �`�ifi' .''1� !�,�,� y.
�, �*�4 `.rt'� s �`i��. �e:z' � ��
` '� � ' s �z���?� ' - • t "� . � '� �, -� +. -4 ,.r, f' ' t� ,/k " , �
i `lr;.� �t +� #' � ^�� :�w" ' , � ��� �t � � . ..{ ; � �—� :..�.- �" ; :
p �q .. } �+µ� � �' . . �, ;j � . �A . �..
{ �� �A ',.t�. � � � h -. � • . d � � : . � ^ �' � aF -.'- �
� i t j � ! t
I t �1! �'�q�, � '� 'b!'�,2�. ��i`i`+�[ p 'R�F�S' � t�Y t � �.. .�. -.� .1�'l ~� .� �, a �► r,
�^V`��1 . M [T�i" �i '.�l � I � 1 '7i•.K �• ,Y� �'x' F
, ..: '��, :� � -�•?� �.�, � �v-.� ' _.� ,r,
I ,�'� � , f y'� ; . % . r "s � �a,• ' ,� . � • �,, t.. r �, .. `
f � �Y� ; '� �t s7Ki t' <# � ' . � � ,� �' ' ". � •` �_,,._,,-,��^'.'-��'r�
f, "' �
"., r� � �. �`, f�' • * �,,, ,{ . !► =.'.�''� .�_
� p{ ���''.�i��,i, ��, 't# }�2�.r' .. �• , ..r�� .n . i�al►�'w. � • . ,
t�.� \ � l �„• �� .
:�� � �y p. ` ts• , �.��+�' �� '.����+x� .!. � ' �` 'f'..��' �1
,�,' . ��.. . ��� �� � � ;�s.' ` .
C�,Y ` �~s� Ji� '^^ 4y s•���. R°���
_ � .c.�'� �P� .�,.���!�'�!a�M �i . t�,. n;/ ��.��' . ,f�� ��'� � � �.:e:�4r- .
K��Q� �,��
CORPGWAT/QN ��
+a �'xNSrtvnHraav�vuesovra•wrnarE,aaa�s,w„w�so�� as�2s
r _.
. __�,�_ .__ __ ....--- -- ----._._ ..� _.. ._._.____------- __ ..._ . . .. ..
��
��
n
toEE '
DETAIL MAP
__ _ ___
RFSC�,(TrION NO. - 1987
RESQ,LTrION 7.D RE,VISE THE �NTRACT WI`I'H SUPER CYQ,E, INC.
EnR �iE FRIDAY IN FRILLEY QIF�SIDE R�CYCLING PROGRAM.
W�ERE�S, the Friday in Fridley Curbside Rec.ycling program has been operating
successfully for aver 2 years; and ,
Wi�tEAS, in the year 1990, the region must meet the goal of diverting 20$ or
rcbre of all the solid waste generateci, froan being landfilled; and
WI�REAS, adequate f�mding to supp�rt the Friday in Fridley Q�rbside Recycling
prograan will be pravided through Anoka County, the Metropolitan Council, the
Deg�rtment of Public Services and the City's waste oil recycling program; and
WHEREAS, the City and Super Cycle, Inc, have negotiated the contract to
inwrporate biweekly oollection of recyclable materials for each recycling
participant in wnjimction with twice a month o�llection; and
WHEREAS, the City and Super Cycle will negotiate the rate for payment
biannually in an amount not to exceed the amo►mt generated through grants; and
WI�REAS, the City and Super C�c1e, Inc. will negotiate any additional changes
to the v�ntract when neaessary in the future.
NQni. Zfi�RE, BE IT RFSCLVID by the City Go�mcil of. the City of Fridl�y that
the City should oontract with Super C�cle to o�ntinue to operate the "Friday
in Fridley" Curbside Recycling program continually until it is deemed not
feasible by the City of Fridley.
PASSID AND ADOFrED BY THE QTY (bUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
OF , 1987.
WII�LIAM J. NEE - N�YOR
ATI'EST:
S�IIRLEY HAAPALA - CITY Q�EEtK
DAY
11
v PLANNING DNISION
0
MEMORANDLIM
cinroF
FRIDLEY
I� �: Jock Robertson, �mm�mity Developnent Director
N�Nn FROM: Myra G. Wicklacz, Planning Assistant and ���{�
Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator �
I�M� D�1TE: J�e 10, 1987
R�RDING: Qirbside Recycling Contract
�e wntract between the City and Super C�cle for C�rbside Recycling servioes is
up on J�me 30, 1987.
Staff has negotiated with Super C�c1e to revise the existing contract. Super
CYc1e and the City have determined that twice a month collection of recyclable
materials is advantageous to increase the participation rate in the City.
S�per Gjrcle has agreed upon a new payment plan with a monthly base price of
51,400.00 for up to arid including 40 tons, and S35 for every ton oollected aver
40 tons. Fbrmerly the oontract between the City and Super C�cle for once a
month oollection vr�nsisted of a monthly base rate of 51,500.00 for up to and
including 50 tons, and S40 for every ton oollected aver 50 tons.
The proposed rate and oollection schedule is vonsistant with that of St. Louis
Park, Plym�uth and Minneapolis. These three Cities have experienced a higher
than average participation rate in curbside recycling, primarily due to
semi-m�nthly oollection of rnaterials.
The Fridley residents will reoeive rare servioe at a reduved cost to the City,
under the new contract. In conjunction with the change to twice a month
collection, the �llection routes and areas have been changed, but the "Friday
in Fridley" ooncept will ranain the same tsee attached map) .
Tne new prograan will begin on August 1, 1987, to allaw the City a month to
advertise the improved oollection program. Grant monies received through the
Met Council Public Information and Education Grant, in the amount of 510,000,
wi11 be utilized to implenent a comprehensive publicity effort. Presently,
sufficient f�mding through Anoka O��mty, the Met C;ouncil and the Department of
Public Services, is available to totally f�md the revised contract which lasts
�ntil December 31, 1987. Should the anticipated 1988 grant monies become
available later this year, the City oould extend this wntract for 6-12.months.
Please find attached, a resolution to the Cit� �uncil for appraval at the June
15, 1987 City Council meeting.
N�-87-138
/ ♦
N
B�MME
'J
. . _,� . . � f= .
COCw asv�o5 � �
►�- ,�• �;.��� � ...... � .
:\ , �. �f•� r� .
�. hY; �� �', a"?I' •lr. .
rA . � ,• • \ � �
'_i i T .f ra� T �.���..
Y= � � �, `�' � � .
�,,,. � :l � a � .` .,,.,____
�� :� , � �i. M
� �
'' C , � . 4 ��-; �•�': .. —
., y . :.
` �'a � „ 1 � Y SiRING �s■c vaaK
t � :
��� \ ,,..• �, �,��.. a /,� '.�� � � � , �
` � �'° f . T `t, . ..i � e. r--r�:
�-. ,��� �. *°. !;i ..r— . --��- . - �:---.r ,, . -:
� �' ..i ' �r i .�� � J �.'_,.. . I .� �rr} �_r t:
s • �j� ��i � � 1� �
• : .s . � " 's
� .il � �. ,wisw i c .� f' .. � .. e .a
. �
F - � � � '� ��»�. �a .,4 'ry ,. ,� i yw..�.i W �w �'Y - � AG S �
� ✓ � ij i . ce.+ �" � ,
_ .wn',� .. -:1 I�. i G Iw..u) °"Mq�.. P ��.
- i[+{!� � � �. ,'� ��� �: �� �' II I\ lYl Y..: .�� � .x w1 ./
n YL : • 1
_ �( ' �,. ,...1, - ,j , _
��. �.�a..` ! . 'r.l` x �..`A'�
ll
� __ s;., F�� �ST $��3RD �FR �t � � .,;. - �
_: Y �
> '`:!' .... ,i ..... i , �„ . - :: • ,�� , o
J • ,� . s.��lj ,'��., al�'?�� I }. � ` • • a
g,,. I, �f�:_ '�.. .v min±w l�et i ru_�i \� y,
_ ��dt , � -; 1 7f 5y„ - a' . cv� _ \ ��r � —9
� , �... ��. �. � . ,�, s �r �, ;' �. , �� .., .
_- � _ y �i .:'' -
�
�
�
W !�
u �'
� fi
��
M
O
.
.
_
�
� � . �
, o :, • . y, ^: w � j
v+ .,' ��-i �r{� .....0 ..���' il � c
. A . ° ,w w�i�f (y. .•� .� �-a' f� , 9 ��i ' d �n� i �k . I _..a '
� I �' + w, » . •� � a,
3 = ? �"� ��r'��;`' SSiS91P� �"FflEe T+ � ,5 �'� �"*:
- .� ,
.N �� r '.. 6MY'- .�4, �� A ° .10 . •. .
� n•ya� i .,t �i�� o� dr y �'�,i � � $ ,� -.. •- b �
�� . � .. ..��� M i I � r ,. � � i � H ' . a. �..L
� - �,� • , � � - ` = --i h .,. � �, i �� � � � � � ;rL i _ :� .:I
��� iy � , r '� �" ,,
� i �� ' � �� •'r � L��� t ' I •• � � C
m �� ra
'•�• I � �� e7 i• ,��� �- , .� �~� _
z , : �
� :.
/� � ' � 1 tr� ,i � , . ! - ` /'! : ' •���a. _ F
L�� ' � i �� _ I ' �9� ¢ " " �•` a
!i . � � �..wn. �� i"�, :
� � � ��, �� ��� '!
� �! ' f � �! 4M"� � a �II
.. ✓ _�,� 1'2 b 17 ti .�,i 9RLL�{, 9 i� .:�L - :
i/! �'', �vi.. u .'..L .�a�7;._ 7� �� ��>I � !n
\ I ���
' � � •• 6,�.. �a . : " , P .,,�s
l �
1�Y„'�a ` ` � � •^ � � �M� , „�...
` n T—i� � �� � �`' : ° . i - '`:
� + � * � �
�� ... �� � � ,,�:� �.t, � . ��
I�: � �. �°' °�F '° � �.0 � .a. � , -- t ' �:C, . ,. r-�
r .. -t � - " .!_ n � gg� M t 7 ., �1
II 1 ..�~ !I, ,� 4�Y��'�'r�t �b �;�q~4 �
�1 ��r ,���i� �• - a�\ J� �r `( i..�.uccr�,
- i1 �' � ? f. - ...,..c ,, ;; :, „ �, `3 �
,I ^`� �t..3: _ CoWMlt� j : MEiGHrS
: +.a. r,'.i_�' �
�' .c� �
;\I , .... ' �i „' _
�� M1Ll .
�' r '
,�_ ,� °`:°' �� = STREET MAP-CITY OF
..,
._�..��i^ �
� '-�'�°�� -� FRI DLEY
�
, � ;. .
.,, �
,� , ir f•:,'� �
�..�
�.-�-y� � � ,...... �
'� "�` ' � 0 3�333 6,656
� I1 `I t � �
r� r� �: _, �
;r ... ,�
�;� . � ...
.�
��. ,
,-� ,
���_ 1NOrt• CO
�� H[wr nti C0.
>',r��
11B
RF�Q.iTrI0l�1 - 1987
A RFSCLUPION APPRWIldG I-694 LAY00'P IDII�ITIFIED AS LAYOUT N0. 16,
S.P. 0285-16 (694=393I, S.P. 2787-16 (674=393), FEDERAL PROJ ECT -
IR 694-5 t 102) FROM T. H. 152 � T. H. 35W
Wi�F'AS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has
prepared: plans, special pravisions, and specifications for the im�rwenent
of Tr�k Highway No. 393, renumbered as Trt,aik Hiylzway No. 694, within the
aorporate limits of the City of Fridley, fram the West Corporate 1 imits to
East River Road; and seeks the apprwal thereof;
Wi�2EAS, any grading or filling required by this project is deemed to be
oonsistent with the requiranents of the Interim Developnent Regulations for
the Mississippi River Corricior Critical Area adninistered by the Minnesota
E�vironmental Quality Board.
NC�1, �N BE IT RESCLVED that said plans and special provisions for the
i�ravanentof said Tr�.mk Highway within said oorp�rate limits of the City,
be and hereby are appraved including the elevations and grades as shawn and
consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said
construction.
BE IT FTIiZTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to requi re the
p3rking of all vehicles, i.f such parking is permitted within the corporate
lunits of said City, on said Tr�k Highway, to be parallel with the curb
adjaoent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all
public streets intersecting said tr�k highway.
BE IT FUi�'iHIIZ RFSCLVED that a grading permit is hereby approved by the
City.
AI�ID BE IT FtJi�THER RFSCGVED that the items identified in City Resolution
39-1987 be included in this resolution.
PASSID AND AD�FPID BY THE QTY QOQI�IL OF THE QTYOF FRILg,EY CN THIS
nAY OF , 1987.
AZTFST:
3iIla,EY A. HAAP�� QTY Q,F�K
3/6/ 1! 10
WII,LIAM J. NEE - N�YOR
12
i . �,.�
�
CITYOF
FRJDLEY
�:
FROM:
I�1TE :
DIRECTORATE
OF
PUBLIC WOAKB
MEMOAANDUM
Nasim Qureshi, City Manager
John G. Flora, Public Works Director
J�me 8, 1987
SUBJECT: I-694 Final Approval
0
iinl87-181
• � o.
��� oo �
� ^
. __ �����
�
r1nDOT District 5 has been desicy�ing the imprwenent of I-694 between S.T.H.
100 and S.T.H. 35W for some time. The preliminary plans were reviewed by
the Co�cil and approved at the May 4, 1987 neeting.
N�DOT is now preparing to award the first phase of the work to construct
new abutments for the westbound lanes aver the Mississippi River and the
associated approaches on the east and west sides of the river. It is
District 5's aesire to obtain a resolution from the cities in which the
work is being �mpleted approving their desic�.
Attached is a resolution approving the layout of I-694 wr�rk and emphasizing
the Gity's aesire to ensure storm water impravanents are in�orporated into
the develognent and provisions are made� to install a 20-inch waterline
tmder I-694 at the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks to support our water
distribution system.
Re�mmend the City Co�cil approve the attached resolution on the I-694
layout .
JGF/ts
Attachments �
�� �,:. . �y, , - ..� ; >--�-, �� � d `y
. : '� � � �.. R— �% , � � � � � 1 t ��
�� � � r�� V
I m �✓\, �� �!;; !�� � � � � f�r` � ,I � ^ Ii � � �
.,�. �; \ ��, ;�. � : . . _- _ �� y �.I i I �
....... ,. a� �� � ��
—�.�.. .�..�. —. _ � ��,; � 1 - .�, � �, � � � �..�� , �; �
,,�_,�', �,�; , ' � �', , � ;� �„ ���? r^��
1 _,� , �� ,� c�� � ��;'���,: � �� � �,
� � i I, -� r-^ � i � � � '� — ,,�
'� q� � ' i �a* � i' ^ - C � I �` � � ;� � �:-
I - � .,f-5`— ' i ��` I , +
�.� �� �l1 .. � I !� �, f �� '
� T . _ # - � - ,i '' � il�.� i i ), � � � �
,!r �:,� � � - ,._lu ' _�U . � ! � .��
I�' ...,_ � _. , � _
I ti J�o � L��' f'iI t p i�� � n 6Q� ��� L �. "��' ��;!� _
� � ��� ��
$ �.5iv� � _ �� I ..� o �.��� tli tr I� u- f ��
� „.�.� �� ,� � rt =•. .�,� �: — _ �-�` �
_ .
�� �-�� �� __ — ; � �. � � — � rJ I
»C��F•� u .-v 4�� � �(�j� a • ��+ I�� o r� �:
r�(`�� 1, � -- --- = _= o: --�— � ��� , ��/'`�-�
� �' ` : : ' [ � � C1J � ♦� � � � % ; /1 \.'G�J
..4Laf.r�. � � � •,
s ;�� � � � -- �r �; �'� � KE ;;
�� � ��� �� , � _ ��� ' � ooRE , � 4� �� - �--, � .
� ,n , � � ', M �� �y � ; e!
� .� , o `�� '7 .._ � ` �'T �i c r'r ���i '� , t �
t '� I� � °i
�' `� � ,i
� � � ����,�� a� ����o�a��� /�f� --j _ � .pp
� / � �, ��„ � �� I � `� � f ��� � r �}q � ^i+'�.�'] �
� I I ��� ' O �.� � �r?� • •� `~1
�-,� -_; ai�rM n��.s ... �:�c-r�-���. � . _- "�"";';;�:I�
, � � ��� ��;� i� _ __ .�� � I � .� !�,,� `;, i .'� ' '� �
�
� 9, . n _
� ��� ' � _� �� � � A���
y-' !�� ' �, � J r.___ :'��
' � �[�� �� ��'� �r
�unuuun� �u� ■di�`r'rir � . � n� • g
� , �bi � r�rrr "" _ - _
f '��� • � �•�- �i7�.:� `�� ��_ ��`�' �L.iy ' ;' ;'�;�"� ;�� �
.,��� � � �� . � rrri�n tu� �r'Wl�� �f � _ _ ::y �.:.�
l . �► i , � , � - � ;,- ��t� . �`�' h ,�' �
. �
� �� i�i �' .... i .-__ �-� ��� �I� i 1= _ ���� ���n��tv � �— .,�,.+, i! � ,
� . � � � -'�'�,t, v� ��� �;,. /"-�
� � i� �1 �;n � , � v..,.., ' .%.— ��� �, �e
. � � ;, , <�� : � r _ ,�- _ p r� �� �=.'' �;• ��"'►Rr�
,
� ' _ x ---
• ,,. ; ., • `� -
-- � �-, l,
` '. ? J .... .. _ ,S , r ^ _ � . . 1 I � � c�r�,_ a .. ~`� .'�__..��` II
� �'. s , I - - � �_fj _ � ��, � � ,` _l�.
3 ���T ~� �� ��`:
� ���\ � � - `"�£ � .-�`--��.,� �' � , � � � .., i I
'� r.L�'- ._.. � _ .. _ � , s ,f ;,'�,� � ; .
� � � _ _�� � �� � � � _ -�_ � �e.ow: �"� wn
;,{ ,4, }(� � C�, �-�---�.-��
'�;,'� �ii _ r.�mJl � •�-�- , • i
� I t � � �Y �'+. M LEITERED STNEET$ �, � . v. -'
�1 `{ } � _ _ i � � 1 I, .� du..... s vY .. . � a.w �. . ... x .. ( MAlEIIED SIAEETi �AN(�
. n 1 �'--� s. �: !E
� ` � �^ , � .. __ _ � L ` �L1"�1� a _ _ '�,_ � -
I �>� ... ,,,,, �, +y �.s� .«.�....� �. _ �.. '• .� .
, ...,_ ...
, _ ,_..�..
, : , I�
.
_ �,.
; <�� �\: , , ,� .. e � .• �
� , �; ti �
. , ; , , _ , 0 , �. �
\\ n� . _...._ r � � CH cwwoi �� ia r� � r�. - ~M erY
� ,1� � �— • ' - _ I
v �._ '� ' __.�.:[��� a. �-:: � .. ., i .��:: .
, ��� f � _ � = = � ���_ ' ,�.
a- � �.� �.. <_, ' �°'
a y� \; ���,�I ��� �...,w_.. s� I �'� .
� J�� . ' � IL'J�tiJ _ - � ' _, • ° _
`� \ _ . °ve,- `
___ � . h \ � i �j �'"�j wu�.s i°� H .. _ ,.r
.�.x.ro.s � �`��' { � '+ I I 11 1 I _ ...a... �.. V ��� w `�a� �.v.�. ri ,�+..�.
D � .__ � I I I I I I yr ��_� � ,..�� �,7 h I ., . ' �::..
< <���, ��� tie.:"' `� "� +�-,::�4 � �y.`
` � �'. _ ^ = �+'; �-- ` � ... >. .�.r � ' ' �
� �� u ` ", I, �I � : .. �• f` ,. �.. �', ! w^.. •
I �''^ � c , ' , ' �..,. ...�., . ` � ���'_..a.�'',+ � •.�.... °'"'�s ~
� ny��C� •TqElTIMOC[7(
� 't�r ^ r � �,'.II _ ,I�' _ ,. + 4.`
� � Y* � <� �I , r ' o�.... .. Q �r�w.... .a.. .�. �;,w
� �
V J , , / --,I� N. � .J�ew d � �=� �
w I '� �1.� j �^ . . �L�4I- � uid� l� . � �d� t��a�
Y � nC• � i� � L �: � "� : �. .�r�. <-••o: w�. ..
r F.
'I, :ie.�� .�.�.�. "' a�.�m... .. � ' ` CNUIICNL� N
' '� �^��'��'� �j .�� .,... .,"...4.. . ,'.�S°.
� ^ rr^nnl,., �! ���`� �, � � � d...d�.
`�°� ��� �, , ` �„l�� � ....�� ; �;..,�..,
/ nnch � • - ..t. ., ..�..,' .. .:.��� « ��. ":��""'
`c^.�r'j n� ' �,�r :�:.�a '°��r .�..'
/ �J i ^ �r� A . . t ' .�.. �L v +w..r s r> ��~..°`r.� H
�,^�n„n^7 �, �,_ � 2 _'�r—
�„.`, , � �,-; p � ' , s I ~ » �.. ., sarr.a co.roa
y ^�'� �� — �TREET MAP— C I.TY OF a .,., "'-"' "
� �_�
� ' o �� �-': �
/` � � °' ��...a.�
�' _ FRID � �
� � cuNes, Mournu,s
; ; :..��.� = - � LE Y .�� �,a
,.:.. v � � �^uhtr ��...,,.,��..� w
L.. ' � � ���/ R:�: �, ^ ..
— .� .� ,... e,.. � � ,,..,,m ,� ,,,,,� ..
;— _. __. ° ,,.. �
���y M�1 �� M � w
irt� �:/ .� Y��M�P�� �� �� � r,rr R� � i1[F���1 +�......• �r �r a�� �F aMy M� N��1 �
.. ..:'.,'�'.N -��iT OI IIIiOI[1 [M�1�[(II�Yt O[MII`II[R i�Y-ii: r M� •
. :OCNTV � •.
I
0 W �Z y� �
'
ri�i
! n 1 n 2 n 3 n 4
n S n � 6 n
13
CITY OF FRILGEY
MEMORANDUM
T0: NASIM M. 4URESHI, CITY MAN�E�2
FftOM : RICFIARD D. PRIB�, FIN�INCE DII2�]CR�OR
StJB.7ECT: RE90��IJTION AU'IHORIZIl� (�IANGFS IN APP�(JPRIATIONS F�OR ZHE GENER1fL
FU1�ID, REVIIJ[JE � FUI�ID, I�RA RE7I�UURSQ�IENP FU1�ID, AI�ID THE C�BLE
T. V. FUI�ID FOR THE FISC�►L YEAR 1986
L�TE : JUI� 11, 1986
Attached is the resolution necessary to acv�nglish the appropriation changes
and adjustments for the 1986 Budget required by the Government Finance
Officers Association in oonjuction with the Award for Outstanding Financia�
Reporting. Because of the increasing requirements of the Award Program we
�rticig�te in, the list of adjust�nents is longer than �st years.
Below you wi11 find an explanation for all the Budget adjustments. Each
change has been identified with an alphabetic character and describes the
changes that are shawn on the resolution.
A. Beginning in 1983, we notified you that because of reporting requirements
it is necessary to make interdivision adjustments between Personal
Services, Supplies and Other Charges, and Capital Outlay. It should be
pointed out that this is not a Charter requirenent nor is it a requirc�aent
of State law, but is merely an adjustment to keep us in compliance with
GF+QA Guuidelines and to insure that we retain the award. Al1 of these
changes have been identified with the letter "A". I would like to point
out that these types of changes do not effect the total dollar amount of
the Budget, but merely adjustments within divisions.
B. Within the General Managesnent Division, activities related to the printing
of public information exoeeded the projected Budget n�eeds by $5,000. The
insurance costs allocable to this division increased by $3,000 and a
Capital Outlay iten, because of a price change, exceeded the Budget by
$10. These a�nounts will be reallocated fran F.�►ergency Reserve to Supplies
and Other Charges, and Capital Outlay.
C. During the gast year, a Personnel Management System was designed and
written irrhouse. The oost of this systsn is being shared with Finance.
The Personnel Division requires a reallocation fraa the Finance Division
in the a�mount of $6,000, along with $10,400 frocn Reserve for Contingency.
D. The Personnel Division incurred costs associated with other operational
activities such as the Ccanparable Worth Study, increased insurance costs,
and the Wellness Program that require an additional $4,350 to be
reallocated from the F�nergency Reserve.
Fund Appropriaton Changes -2- Jtuie 11, 1987
E. The Legal Division requires a transfer from Reserve in the amount of
$28,600 because of the Legal costs involved in the Carmunity Options case
and grosecution costs related to an increased number of offenses within
the City. _
F. The Election Division requires an additional $6,300 due to a larger
election which required more judges.
G. The Assessing Division requires an additional $1,100 reallocated f rom the
�nergency Reserve for oosts associated with increased insuranve costs.
H. Because of an emergency replacement of the air conditioning unit within
the Civic Center, the Civic Center Division reguires an additional $400 to
be reallocated f rmn F�nergency Reserve.
I. 7."he Police Division requires an additional $81,000 within Personnel and
$14,250 within Supplies and Other Charges to be transferred form Emergency
Reserve. During 1986, the Police De�rtment was fu].ly staffed with the
inclusion of two new Police Officers and four Coimnunity Servioe Officers.
The Polive Department was another area that saw sicp�i.f icant increases in
insurance.
J. Due to the high costs of Workers Canpensation Insuranoe, the Fire Division
experienced an increase that requires that an additional $24,300 be
transferred form �nergency Reserve to the Fire Division under Personal
Services.
R. The insurance costs for the Fire Division requires that an additional
$9,000 be reallocated fran the bnergency Reserve.
L. The Fire Division received a donation from the VFW for Continuing
Education in Fire Suppression. The Supplies and Other Charges should be
increased along with the Miscellaneous Revenue-Donations for $4,300.
M. Due to a large ntmiber of proposed projects, the Engineering stiaff time
that is ordinarily assessed was expended within the General Fund, thus
requiring a reallocation fro�n F�nergency Rsserve in the �nount of $16,100.
13A
13B
Fund Appropriations Changes -3- Jime 11, 1987
N. A n�anber of factors oontributed to the need for an additional $99,000 to
be reallocated froni the Ffiergency Reserve. The public Works Division saw
one of the biggest increases in insurance because of the higher rates
attributed to risk. We also had two long standing enployees retire with
large accwaulated benefits.
0. T'he Naturalist experienced a fire in the Nature Center Building during
1986. The $8,300 is required under Supplies and Other Charges as an
offset to Miscellaneous R�venue-Insuranoe reimbursment for the rebuilding
the interior of the Nature Center.
P. The City of Fridley has been purchasing the R�venue Sharing Handbook along
with the monthly updates to insure that we were in compliance with the
Federal Guidelines for Revenue Sharing. Therefore, we need Budget
authority for the $175 in the area of supplies and other charges.
Q. Each year the City of Fridley expencls money for the purposes of providing
professional servioes for the HIZA. The I�A Reimburs�nent F1and is used to
keep track of the amount of these expenditures. This money is then
reimbursed to the City fran the Housing ad Redevelopnent Authority. Each
year we set up a Budget for this aaaunt and shaw the revenue sources f rom
the HRA.
R Last year the Cable T.V. operations purchased equipment needed for the
operations of the Gaverr�nt Access Channel. FUnding for these purchases
was provided through a donation fran the VFW in the aanount of $14,005, and
also frc�n usage of fund balance in the amount of $7,800. Supplies and
other Charges require an additional $9,000 to be transferred f rom fund
balance for the payment of A.C.C.W.
RDP:sh
;��. .��M�•,� ,• ' :1
• s.�� � �� • � �: �:� v � �: � t+s. i � ••��• � �� � � � � �:i�
N� I;r' � ' 1 JI '�' y 1' �:/• • �• . 1 � r• ' 1 � 11 ICI:
:1' • ' 1 I: 1''15 Is �' ' 1 1'�" �:I: I'
WHEREAS, GFOA requires that all line items within divisions reflect a
favorable accoimt balance in the annual re�ort; and
WHF�tEAS, the City spent an additional $8,010 in general management for the
publication of informational materials, insurance costs, and capital outlay
items; and
V�FIEREAS, the City Personr�el division developed a personal management system
ana requires an additional $16,400; and
WHEREAS, the City Personnel division expended an additional $4,350 for
comparable worth, increased insurance oosts, and the wellness program; and
WhEREAS, the City's Legal division was involved in increased general
prosecution, and defense activities related to community options and an
additional $28,600 is required; and
WHII�EAS, the Elections division requires an additional $6,300 related to
increased election costs; and
WHEREAS, the Assessing division requires an additional $1,100 associated with
the increased insurance costs; and
WHEREAS, the Civic Center clivision requires an additional $4,000 associate6
with the reFlacement of an air conditioning unit; and
WHIItEAS, the Police division requires an additional $95,250 for protection and
community services; and
WHEREAS, the Fire division requires an additional $33,300 associatect with
increased insurance costs; and
WHEREAS, the Fire division received a donation for fire education in the
amount of $4,300; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering division requires an additional $16,100 for proposed
projects; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works division reguires $99,000 for increased insurance
casts, and benef it payments to retired employees; and
WHEREAS, the Naturalist division requires an additional $8,300 associated with
the f ire damage; and
WF�REAS, the City expended $175 out of the revenue sharing fima for a revenue
sharing handbook; and .
WHEREAS, the i�2A Reimbursement fund had expenditures of $101,550 which need to
be properly budgeted for; and
WHEREAS, the Cable T.V. fund acquired additional equi�nent and increased
payments to A.C.C.W. in the amount of $30,805.
13C
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1987
13D
I�XJW, THEREFORE, BE IT RFS�,VED that the budgets of the follawing divisions and
f�mds be amended as follaws:
City Counci.l
Other Conunissions
City Manager
Personriel
Legal
Elections
Assessing
Finance
Civ ic Center
Police
Fire
Code Enforcement
Planning
�hgineering ,
Public Works
Naturalist
Recreation
SiB7.0'�i,
GFl�IERAL FOI�D
�,ippropri.atiaaLs
Personal Services
Personal Servioes
Supplies and Other Charges
Capital Outlay
Fersonal Servioes
Personal Servioes
Supplies and Other Charges
Supplies and Other Charges
Personal Servioes
Supplies and Other C�arges
Supplies and Other Charges
Supplies and Other Charges
Personal Servioes
Capital Outlay
Personal Servioes
St�plies and Other Charges
Personal Servioes
Supplies and Other Charges
Supplies and Other Charges
Fersonal Servioes
Personal Servioes
Supplies and Other Charyes
Personal Services
Capital Outlay
Personal Servioes
Supplies and Other Charges
Personal Servioes
Supplies and Other charges
Capital Outlay
Supplies and Other (�arges
Supplies and Other Charges
Supplies and Other Charges
(A)$ 3,000.00
(A) (3,000.00)
(B) 8,000.00
(B) 10.00
(C) 6,000.00
(C) 10,400.00
(D) 4,350.00
(E) 28,600.00
(A) (7,500.00)
(A) ?,500.00
(F) 6,300.00
(G} 1,100.00
(C) (6,000.00)
(H} 4,000.00
(I) 81,000.00
(I) 14,250.00
(J) 24,300.00
(K) 9,000.00
(L) 4,300.00
(A) (18,500.00)
(A) (1,500.00)
(A) 18,500.00
(A) 1,500.00
(A) 10.00
(M) 16,100.00
(A) 7,000.00
(Nj 99,000.00
(A) (7,000.00)
(A) (10.00)
(0) 8,300.00
(A) 2,600.00
(A) (2,600.00)
Page 3- Resolution No. - 1987
Reserve for Contingency
� � : � v
ReveRtles
Miscellaneous Revenue - Donations
Miscellaneous Fevenue - Insurance Reimbursement
ZO►!�L
R�a��,.�i• �:: ; �, ;.��, �
� �. . . .
Su�plies and Oti�er Charges
Fund Balance
:�� � • ;�i i: � •.r,� io- i • i �
•�... .�
Personal .�.ervices
Supplies and Ott►er Charges
Estimat� R�venues
Intergoverrunental - Local
Q�,E T.V. FUAD
• �. . . ., �
Supplies and Other Charges
Capital Outlay
F�timated Revenu�s
Donations
Fund Balance
(B)$ (8,000.00)
(B) (10.00)
(C) (10,400.00)
(D) (4,350.00)
(E) (28,600.00)
(F) (6,300.00)
(G) (1,100.00)
(H) (4,000.00)
(I) (81,000.00)
(I) (14,250.04)
(J) (24,300.00)
(K) (9,000.00)
(M) (16,000.00)
(N) (99,000.00)
306,410.00)
(L)$ (4,300.00)
(0) (8r300.Q0j
12,600.00)
(P)$ 175.00
(P) (175.00)
(Q)$ 81,200.00
(Q) 20,350.00
, •
(Q)$ 101,550.00
(R)$ 9,000.00
(R) 21,805.00
� . •
(R)$ 14,005.00
(R) 16,800.00
13E
Page 4- Resolution No. - 1987
PASSED AND AD�FPED BY THE QTY QOiJNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRITLEY THIS I1�Y OF
, 1987
WILLIF,M J. 1�E - MAYOR
ATTEST :
33IRLEY A. Y.AP►PALA - CITY CT�ERK
13F
A RES OLIITION N0. - 1987
RFSOLOTION CONFIRMINiG AN INV ITATION TO THE CITY OF LAII,
PAPUA NLW GUINEA TO BECOM3 A SISZl:R CITY AND INP ITING THE
PEOPLE OF LAE, PAPUA NEW GIIINEA TO PARTICIPATE IN SAID
PROGKAM
WF�REAS, the Sister City Program Was inaugurated by the President of the
United States, Dwight D. Eisenhower, in 1956 to establish greater friendship
and understanding on a person to person basis between the peoples of the
United States and other nations through the medium of direct personal contact;
and
WI�REAS, all sueceeding United States Presidents have endorsed said program to
be conducted for the broad purposes of cultural� social and technical
interchange between the Citizens of the United States of America and the
peoples of other nations; and
Wi�REAS, to implement this program, Fridley, Minnesota and other communities
in the United States have been requested by Sister Cities International (Town
Affiliation Association of the U.S., Inc.) to affiliate with cities in other
nations of similar mutual interests, and;
WHEREAS, the City oP Fridley, Minnesota through its Council does recognize and
endorse this program with the hope that it will lead to a lasting friendship
between the people oP Fridley, Minnesota and Lae, Papua New Guinea.
NQd, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL�ED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota that this Couneil on behalP oP the people of Fridley does hereby
confirm an invitation to the government and the people of the City of Lae,
Papua New Guinea to participate with Fridley, Minnesota as its Sister City for
the purpose of creating greater mutual understanding between the peoples oP
our two cities and nations.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLIIED that copies of this Resolution are to be sent to the
Mayor and Council of the City of Lae, Papua New Gui ne a, S i ste r Ci tie s
International and the Embassy of Papua NeW Guinea.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY Z'f� CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY
OF , 198? .
i�iILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTES T:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
14
. ^�w
�
�
CITYOF
F(JDLEY
.
DIRECTORATE
� F
PUBLtC WORKS
lVSEMORANDUM
Zt�: Nasim Qureshi, Gity N,anager
FRUM: John G. Flora, �Publ ic Works Di rector
�TE: J�e 8, 1987
SZTBJ��T: Change Order No. 1- ST. 1987 - 1
FW87-178
�1 O ` (�
���� O Q O
{---..
.-�� ,,����
-`J
Inoorporated in this year's Street Impravement Project is the averlay of
the C�orrunons Park tennis oourts and a segment of 75th Avenue. These two
arc-�as have experienced considerable longitudinal and transverse cracking.
As a means of elur.inating the ceflection of these cracks into the overlay
surfaoe, we have investigated the glacement of a geotextile fabric over the
existing surfaoe prior to the overlay as a oorrective measure. Northwest
Asphalt has provided us a written proposal to accomplish the work in
oonjimction with the averlay project at a o�st of 510,320.00.
As the plaoement of geotextile material is incidental to the overlay work
and the change order proposal is approximately within 5 percent of the
original oontract, we would reconvn�nd that the City �uncil approve Change
Order No. 1 to Northwesrt Asphalt oontract for an amo�.c�t of 510,320.00 for
the placement of 4eotextile material to eliminate the reflection of cracks
in the new surf aoe.
JGF/ts
5
15A
PUBLIC WC�KS DEPA,RTM,F�]'T
E�gineering Division
CITY OF FRII�EY
Fridley, Minnesota
Jime 15, 1987
I3crthwest Asphalt
1451 County Rc�ad #89
Shakopee� NN 55375
SUB,7ECT: Change Orc3er �1, Street Impravenent
Project ST. 1987 - 1
Gentl anen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract for
Street Impravenent Project ST. 1987 - 1 by adding the follawing:
.`�r �
F�rnish and Install
Petromat Protective
Membrane
��,� �,� �
A�, PROXs OUAA'TI'1'Y
8,600 Sq. Yd.
UNI�I' PRICE
51.20 Sq. Yd.
.�
510,320.00
�'I�1L (�i�[�]GE OTtDER #1. . . . . . . . . . 510,320.00
�IGINpi, apNI�RACT pRICE (ST. 1987-1) . . 5195,202.50
REUISID QO�TI�ACT AI�L)IJNT
5205,522.50
SUtx;tr�itted and approved tr� John G. Flora, Public Works Director on the 15th day
of J�.me, 1987.
Pre�red t� �
Checked by ��.1! �.�
�/���-2�-z �
/ John G. Flora, P.E.
Public Works Director
15B
Northwest Asphalt
Page 2
Change Order �1 - ST. 1987-1
Appraved and accepted this day of ► 1987 by Northwest Asphalt.
NpR'Ii-E�JFST ASPfiALT
.( ', ] .
-----��� � �
�d6 S ��
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Appraved and acoepted this day of
Fridley, Minnesota.
3/6/ 4/ 6
, 1987 by the City Council of
WII,LIAN; J. NEE N,AY�R
SHIRLEY A. H�PALA - CITY Q,ERK
. �.,,...
�
CITYOF
f [JDLEY
ZD •
.
FROM:
IY�TE :
DIRECTORATE
� F
PUBLtC WORK8
MEMOAANOUM
Nasin, Qureshi, City Manager
l
John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
Jt,u�e 10, 1987
SUBJECT: Comr�ons Fi.ltration Plant - Change Order No. 1
s
xas�-is�
o: -
�--����� Ob0 O
t'`L
== =
4 __ w
't. - _ .'��b,.
In preliminary meetings with Shank Mechanical and TIQ�A, a number of items
of possible �st reductions were discussed. Zl�e follawing nire items were
listed as oost reductians alternatives:
1. £limination of the backwash tank . . . . . . . . . . . .5175,000.00
2. Shortening of the backwash tank . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,000.00
� 3. Double 90 on the 24" high servioe line in lieu
of relocating the existing tee assemblies and
c�:te valves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,000.00
4. Extenciing the time o� completion and rescheduling
of the tie-ins to elirrirate any avertime work. ....
5. Deduct the �inting, except for the interior of
fil te r tanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.
� 7.
�
Landscaping and fencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Steel pipe in lieu of ductile iron pipe for
all interior piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C4�er;ical feed equi�ent - Wallave Tiernan
v. s. Capitol . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C� 9. FT�1C valves in lieu of Pratt valves (contingent
upon F�iC representative inspecting existing
valves on May 26, 1987 for vc�m�tability .......
1,500.00
17,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
11,700.00
30.000.00
Ite�ns 1 and 2 were eliminated b� acoepting the bid prop�sal fran Shank and
building the backwash tank. Items 3, 7. 8 and 9 appear to save the City
f�c�s without affecting desicy� or plans for the new facility. The other
items listed will be needed to ensure the project is completed
sa ti � actor ily .
Therefore, the City of Fridley will acoept the oost reductions f rom items
3. 7, 8 and 9 for a total of 550,000.00 reducing the original bid f rom
51,450,000 to 51,400,000.00.
If you need further information, please let me laiow.
0
P(JBLIC WORKS DEA�RTN43�1T
F�gineering Division
QTY OF FRILGEY
Fridley, Minnesota
Jtme 15, 1987
Shank Mechanical, Inc.
3501 - 85th Ave. , N.
1�'u.nneapol is, DN 55433
SUBJEC�: Chanoe Order �1 - Regair of Cammons Park
Filtration Plant Project #164
C�ntl �nen :
You are hereby orc3ered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract
tor Reg�ir of Comirbns Park Filtration Plant Project #164 by adding the
follaaing:
•�� •�
DESCR�FTION
__!_
1. Double 90 on 24" servioe line . . . . . . . . . . . . S 2,000.00
2. Steel pipe in lieu of iron pipe . . . . . . . . . . . 6,0OO.OQ
3. FMC valve in lieu of Pratt valves .......... 30,000.00
4. Chenical feed equignent - Wollaoe Tiernan
v. s. Capitol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._.�?1990.00
�TAL �iANGE ORDER #1. . . . . . . . . . . S 50,000.00
ORIGINAL ODN'I�CI' PRICE (Proj. #164) . . .51,450,000.00
z�'rAt, a�Ar�cE or��t #1. . . . . . . . . . ._ �900.00
R�,UISID OI�NI'RACT F+NWNr. . . . . . . . . . 51,400,000.00
51itr;titted and a�prwed by John G. Flora, Public Works Director on the 18th
day of bSay, 1987.
Prepared by
Checked by
�>�.
,
� ^�-
G. Flora, P. E.
Public Works Director
16A
�
• :
Shank Mechanical, Inc.
Page 2
Change Order �1
Repair of Commons park�.:Filtration Plant Project #164
Apprwed and accepted this day of , 1987 by 51mde Er►gineering,
Inc.
Shank Mechanical, Inc.
Mr. Lyle A. 5hank, President
Appraved and acvepted this day of , 1987 by the City Council of
Fridley, Minnesota.
3/6/4/21
WII,LIAM J . NEE MAYOR
SHIRLEY A. H�IPALA - CITY Q,E�K
. r ..-�
f
�
CITYOF
f (J DL EY
�v:
FROI�;:
I14TE :
DIRECTO RATE
�F
PUBLIC WORKS
MEMOF�ANDUM
2vasim Qureshi, Gity Manager
John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
J�.a�e 8, 1987
SL15JF:�'?': Construction Inspection - Commpns Park Filtration Plant
. � o°'�
��'� Oa� O
� "
�_ �.�~�,.
Ra87-17 9
With the aaard of the C�unons Park Filtration Plant Project #161 to Shank
N,echanical, we would reo�mmend that the City Co�cil retain the servives of
Tf� to inspect the vonstruction work.
TI� has cyesic�ed the plans and specifications for the special electrical�
chanical and mechanical changes to the filter plant associated with the
r��oval of i ron and mangenese f rcxn our minicipal water . Because of thei r
fa;:iliarity of the project ciesic� and the peculiarity of ttiis project, we
would reoommend that Ti�A be retained for the inspection of this work.
The original design of the project was 552,000, a change order to
ino�rg�rate a renavation of eletrical oontrols amounted to 515,000 for a
total contract amount to TKDA of S67,000. With the addition of the
o�nstruction inspection of 525,400, their averall �ontract for the filter
gl�nt work is 6.5 peroent. _
JGF/ts
0
�C+
. �...._
�
CITYOf
F f�D�EY
T0:
F'ROI•i :
�TE :
DtRECTORAYE
'OF
PUBLIC WOAK8
MEMORANDUM
Nasim Qureshi, City Manager
John G. Floraf Pu�c Works Directot
J une 11, 1987
SURJECT; Char�oe Oruer No. 1 for Sun� Engineering
�� °�`�
{���-� o � o
�� �
�� ; .�S�b.
�s�—iso
Sunc:se Engineerir,g was retair�d at the request of the HRA by the Cit�� to
accor:��lish the engineering work associatea with the Woodbric;ge/Lake Pointe
DeveloFr:ent. Due to ti,e increased amount of construction inspection ana
surveying associatea with the integration of earthwork, storm sewer,
utilities, street oonstruction an6 lanciscaping in the project, there has
been ai-+ increase in the ar„ount of inspection and survcyirig required. This
was aue to the require�.ent to provicie oontrols for each contractor during
the ����::�ed work accer.��lished in lieu of supQort each job in6e�xnaently ano
the averall tern� of all of the indiviauGl contrackS A change order
totalling $7►500.00 was sut�;:itteo to the EIRA at their June 11 meetir,g anu
appraved. '
Reco�rn�enL the City Council a��prove Change Oraer No. 1 to the Sunde
Engir�erir�g contract for $7.500.00.
JGF/ts
0
7
RJBLIC WORKS DEPARZ�£r
Engineering Division
QTY CF' FIZIDLE'�C
Fridiey, Minn+esota
May 18, 1987
Si3nde E�gineering; Inc.
9001 East Bloanington Freeway
Bloanington, NIId 55420
SUBJECT: Change Order #1 Lake Fbinte Corporate Center
Gentle��n:
f
� 17A
You are her�y ordered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract
for Lake Pointe Coz�arate Center by adding the following:
ADDITIONS
I'P�I�'I APF'R�QX. !Qi1ANPITY LTNIT PRICE ANDUIJP
Construction Staking
and Inspection
ORIGINAL QONI'RACT PRICE . . . . . . . . $150,699.00
TCII'AL QiANGE ORDER #1 . . . . . . . . . $ 7,500.00
RF.VISED CAATI'RACT ANLL7NT $158,199.00
51�bmitted and apprwed by John G. Flora. Public Works Director � the 18th
day of May, 1987.
Prepared by � , �
Q�ecked by .:��!��( /_�-��l
� �� � � -
.' � � �—
�?� G. Flora, P.E.
�lic Works Directar
Surr3e Ehgineering. Inc.
Page 2
C�zge Order #1
Lake Pointe Corpar'ate Center
Approved and accept«1 this �� day of �, 1987 by S1irrle F�ngi.neering,
T...�. � J
11 D..
SUI�IDE ENGIl�ERIr1G. IlVC.
�.�.���� ,�_...-.-���
- Jeny S1u�de. President
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Appraved and accepted this day of _ , 1987 by the City Council of
Fridley, Minnesota.
3/6/4/20
WII.,LIAM J. I�E MAYOR
SHIRLEY A. H�PALA - CITY Q�ERK
�
.
�
-a � FOR CONCURRENCE BY TNE ClTY COUNCIL
June 15, 1987
Type of License: By_ Approved By:
AUCTIONEERS
-- LICENSES
Fridley Methodist Church Ron Andrle James P. Hill
666 ��tississippi St.N.E. Public Safety Dir.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
CIGARETTE
Ground Round Theisen Vending James P. Hill
5277 Central Ave.N.E. Public Safety Director
Fridley, Mn. 55432
Sinclair Retail #22038
6071 University Ave.N.E.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
Skywood Inn
5201 Central Ave. N.E.
Fri ldey, P�n. 55432
Viking Chevrolet Co.
7501 Hwy. #65 N.E.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
ITINERANT FOOD PERMIT
Fridley 49er's Days
2567 Delware Ave.
Mendota Hgts.,Mn. 55118
HOTEL, MOTEL
Skywood Inn
6071 University AVe.N.E.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
Sinclair Retail #22038
6071 University Ave.N.E.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
TEMP.ON SALE LIQUOR
Fridley Jaycees
P.O.Box 32004
Fridley,Mn. 55432
PRIVATE GAS PUMP
Viking Chevrolet Co.
7501 Hwy. #65�
Frir�ln�� Mn ���2
Sinclair P•1kt.Co.
Skywood Ma11,Part.
Mark J. Dooley
P4ike Kennedy
Skywood Ma11,Part.
Sinclair Mkt.Co.
John Kobs
Mark J.Dooley
James P. H�ill
Public Safety Director
�� �� ��
�� �� ��
Richard Larson
Fire Inspector
Fees:
Asking-Fees to
Waived
James P. Hill
Public Safety Director
James P. Hill
Public Safety Director
$12,00
$12.00
$24.00
$12.00
$30.00
�625.0
$45.
$30.
�
= FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCiL -- LICENSES
jUI3E 1 S , 1987
�CAVATII�
R& K Heating & Plbg. Inc.
6 011 I.Ane Oak Rpad ��' Q'�
Rockford, NN 55373 By: Dennis Kasin (hief Bldg. C�cl.
GAS SER��
R& R Heating & Plbg. Inc.
6011 Lone Oak Road
Fockford, M3 55373
GE�IERAL GON!'RACTOR
Ec�nac� Builders Inc.
1066 West 3rd Avenue
Shakopee, NN 55379
Darrel Farr Developnent Corp.
4600 Lake Road
Robbinsdale, NN 55422
Midas Builders
5025 Bald Eagle Avenue
White Bear Lake, MV 55110
Re�ter Construction Inc.
17 East Elmaood Plaoe
Minneapolis, hN 55419
ZWin City Stortn Sash CA. ► InC.
26 41 Loui si ana Avenue South
Minneapolis, NN 55426
University Avenue Associates
111 - 83 rd Avenue N. E.
Fridley, NN 55432
Earl Weikle & Sons
2514 - 24th Avenue South
Minneapolis, NN 55406
HFATING
Airco Heating & A/C Co.
4014 Central Avenue N.E.
N,inneapol is, NN 55421
R& R Heating & Plbg. Inc.
6011 Lone Oak Road
Rockford, M3 55373
SIQV ��t
Attracta Sign, Inc
6417 Penn Avenue South
Richf ield, rN 55423
By: Bob Willette
By: Thanas F�3nan
By; Daniel Farr
By: Michael Midas
By: Richard Reuter
By: Sa¢�► Rozr�an
By: Leon Martin
By: Earl Weikle
By: Miles Walthour
By: Bob Willette
By: A1 Sterner
WII,LIAM SANDIN
Plbg. -Htg. Insp.
L�RRFI� Q�RK
Chief Bldg. Oic1.
Same
Sane
SaQne
Same
Sane
Same
WII,LIAM SANDIN
Pl bg. -Htg. Insp.
Sa�ne
DARR� Q�ARK
Chief Bldg. OFCl.
■
�
0
r FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- ESTIMATES +2 O
'
dune 15, 1987 I
Herrick & Ne�rman, P.A.
6u01 University Ave. NE
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
For Service s Rendered as City Attorney
For the Month of May, 1987 . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • � 2� 637 •50
Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon � Haskvitz
6401 University Ave. NE
Suite 301
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
For Services Rendered as City Prosecutor
For the Month of March, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 8,850.00
For the Month of April, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.9u4 •75
316,79k.75
Enebak Construction Comparry
P.O. Box 458
?7orthfield, NW 5505?
Demolition & Site Grading Project #163
Estimate No. u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�133, 495 .68
Ernst Associates
122 West 6th Street
GY�aska, NIN 55318
Landscaping, Irrigation � Li�ting Project #168
Estimate No. 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�
H� S Asph al t, Inc .
1700 Industry Blvd.
Anoka, NW 55303
594 .1?
Street Improvement Project ST. 1986 - 1� 2(Phase 2)
Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39,617.4?
Subterranean Engineering
6875 HighWay 65, N.E.
Fridley, NIIJ 55432
Lake Pointe Corporate Center
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 327.50
Sunde Engineering
9001 E. Bloomington FreeWay
Bloomington, I�4T 55�420
Lake Pointe Corporate Ceater
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E 7,53T.75
�
;_ - a�
� � ��.. 4 �
,�. .
�
�1
i
ORDINANCE NO.
• AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING
_ APPENDIR F TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF SALARIES FOR
THE MAYOR AND COIJAICIIMEhhLBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
2.07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows:
The annual salaries for the Mayor and Councilmembers during 1988 and
subsequent years shall be as follows:
Mayor
Councilmember at Large
Councilmember, Ward I
Councilmember, Ward II
Councilmember, Ward III
$7,500
$6,150
$5,475
$5,475
$5,475
PASSED A13D ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
, 1987
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
DAY OF