10/19/1987 - 5069OFFICIAL CITY COUNCIL I!G$NDA
COUNCIL l�BETII�G
OCTOBER 19, 1987
�
fRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ri.E�ISE SIGN NAME ADDRESS ANO ITEM MtMBER INTERESTED IN QATE: October 19, 1987
NAME ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER
sssasssasssss�aasassasssasszasasss:ssssisaaassss:asassasasssasas��ssssss�sssssaass:�saas:as=:sr�
'. . Council Meeting, October 19, 1987
PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED):
Publ ic Hearing on a V acation, S AV �87-09, to V acate
The 6 Foot Drainage Easement on the North Side of
Lot 3, Bloek 2, Heather Hills Second Addition, the
Same Being 6191 Kerry Lane N.E., by Gregory
Mortenson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Opened at 7:47 p.m. Closed at 7:50 p.m.
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Item is on next
agenda for consideration
OLD BUSINESS •
Page 2
. . 2 - 2 E
Consideration of Appointments to Energy and
Environmental Quality Commissions . . . . . . . . . . .
Appointed Paul Dahlberg to Environmental
Quality Commission. Tabled other appointments
CITY MANAGER--ACTION TAREN: Notify appropriate parties
of Couneil appointment and put other commission openings
on next agenda for consideration
NEW BUS INESS :
Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinanee
Recodifying the Fridley City Code Chapter 30
Entitled Charitable Gambling by Amending Seetion
30.03, Adding New Section 30.0� and Renumbering
Consecutively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tabled for report from staff
. 3
. . . . . 4 - 4 A
POLICE DEPT.--ACTION TAREN: Placed on Nov. 9, 1987
agenda.
,. . Couneil Meeting, October 19, 1987 Pa�e 3
NEW BUSINESS ( CONTINUED) :
Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of October 7, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5 J
Received
A. Consideration of an Ordinance Recodifying
Chapter 205 of the Fridley City
Code, to Allow Limited Amounts and Types of
Commereial Uses in M-1 (Light Industrial ) and M-2
(Heavy Industrial) Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5C
& 5E-5J
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval
Gouneil Aetion Needed: Set Publie Hearing for
November 9, 1987
Set Public Hearing for 11/9/87
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Set publie hearing
for November 9
Receiving the Minutes of the Charter Commission
Meeting of May 11, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 K
Received
COMMIINTTY DEYELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Filed for Puture
reference
Consideration of a Fire Service Contract Be�ween
City of Fridley and City of Hilltop . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 F
Approved
FIRE DEPT.--ACTION TAREN: Upon receipt of signed
copies, they will be forwarded to City of Hilltop
and City of Fridley files
Consideration of Change Order �5 for Demolition and
Site Grading Project �163 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ - 8 B
Approved
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized
;• . • Couneil Meeting, Oetober 19, 1987
NEW BUS INESS ( CONTINUED) :
Page �
Consideration of Change Order #2 for Street Improvement
Projeet No. ST. 1986 - 1 & 2, Phase 2. . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 A
Approved
PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized
Receiving Bids and Award Contract for Storm Sewer and
Watermain Projeet �169 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 C
Received and awarded contraet to low bidder,
Glendale Contracting
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Notified low bidder of Council
approval
Consideration of a Resolution Auth orizing an
Agreement Between the City of Fridley and Anoka
County Community Action Program, Inc. to Provide
a Senior Outreaeh Worker in the City of Fridley ..... 11 - 11 W
Resolution No. 82-1987 adopted
CITY MANAGER--ACTION TAKEN: Proeeeded as authorized
Appointment - City Empl oyee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2
Coneurred
CITY MANAGER--ACTION TAKEN: Informed Aecounting of
new empl oyee
Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Approved
CENTRAL SERV ICE--ACTION TAKEN: Paid C1 aims
L3censes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1� - 1�4 B
Approved
CENTRAL SER�iICE--ACTION TAREN: Issued Licenses
E stimate s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 5 - 15 J
Approved
CENTRAL SERV ICE--ACTION TAKEN: Paid Estimates
ADJOURN: 8:27 p.m.
COUfJCIL I�EETI �G, OCTOBER 19, 1987 PAGE 2 -
FU�LIC HEAP,INGS (CONTINUEQ):
PUQLIC HEARislG ON A VACATION, SAV #87-09, TO VACATE
THE 6 FOG7 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
LCT ', E�LOCK 2. HEATHER HILLS SECOND ADDITION, THE
S!`.I�`;= BE I hG 6191 KERRY LANE N, E. . BY GREGORY
��'e�1E��sorv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2 E
Ol_D Bl►SINESS:
CA�lS I CERAT I ON OF APP01 P:Th1E�JTS TO ENERGY AND
ENV I RONh1Eh�TAL (1UAL I TY COMM I SS I ONS . . , . . . . . . . . . 3
NEI�,� BUS I NESS ;
CONSIDERATIO� OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDi�lANCE
RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY C1TY CODE CHAPTER 30
E�;T I TLED CHAP. I TABLE GAMBL I NG BY AMENDI NG SECT I ON
3� .�`3 , ADD i NG NEW SECT I ON 30.04 AND RENUMBER I NG
COP:SECUTIVELY , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 4 — � A
i;OU�fCIL�`'�EETI NG, E)CTOBER �9, ����
PA GE 3
NEL�J BUS I NESS ( CONT I NUED )�
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
I'�'�ET I NG OF OCTOBER 7 , 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 — 5 J
A, CONSIDERATION OF A CHAhGE TO THE ZONING
ORDI �lANCE UNDER CHAPTER 2Qf5 OF THE FRI DLEY CI TY
CODE, TO ALLO�J LIMITED AMOUNTS AND TYPES OF
COMh1ER C I AL USE S I N N�� 1( L I GHT I NDUSTR I AL ) AND h"-2
(HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICTS . , , , , , , , , , , . 5-5C
& 5E-5J
PLANN I PdG COMP11 SS I ON RECOM�1ENDAT I ON: APPROVAL
COUNCIL ACTION NEED D: SET PUQLIC HEARING FOR
NOVEMBE� 9. 1987
e
PECE I V i NG THE f�"I P�UTE S OF THE CHARTER COMM I SS I ON
P�'�EET I I�G OF I�IAY 11 . 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 — 6 K
COP!S I DEP.AT I ON OF A FI P.E SERU I CE CONTRACT BETIn'EEN
CI TY OF FRI DLEY AND CI TY OF HILLTOP ........... 7— 7 F
�OUNCIL MEETING. OCTOBER 19, 1987 PAGE 4
�!E��J BUS I �!ESS ( CONT I NUED ):
CONSIDERATIO� OF CHANGE ORDER �5 FOR DEMOLITION AND
S i TE GRAQ I NG PROJECT #163 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 B
CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER #Z FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT
PRO�ECT �o, ST, 1986 - 1 & 2, PHASE 2 , . . , . , . . . . . 9 - 9 A
RECEIVING BIDS AhD A6��ARD CONTRACT FOR STORM SEWER AND
��ATERMAI P! PROJECT #i69 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 10 - 10 C
e
COtvS I DERAT I 01� OF A RESOL UT I ON AUTHOR I Z I NG AN
AGP,EEME�T SETWEEh THE CI TY OF FR I DLEY AND ANOK.A
COUP�TY COMMUN 1 TY Ac� i or� PROGRAJ�1, I NC, TO PROV I CE
A SEN I OR OUTP.EACH l^IORKER I N THE CI TY OF FR I ULEY ..... 1 1 - 1 1 I��
APPO { NTMENT - C 1 TY EMPLOYEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
C�AIMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
LiCENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 B
EST I MATE S , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 15 - 15 J
,� � •
TI� MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL I�ETING OF
OCTOBER 5, 1987
THE MINUTES OF THE REGUI.AR MEETINiG OF Ti� FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF OCTOBER 5�
-1987
The Regular Meeting of tkie Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:44
p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
'� Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
F7. ag .
ROLL CALL:
I�EN�ERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Goodspeed, Couneilman
Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and
Councilwoman Jorgenson
trEN�ERS ABSENT: None
PROCLAMATIOI�S :
SAFE RIAS WEEK - OCTOBER 11-17, 1987:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, read this proelamation which was
issued by Mayor Nee.
Ms. Sether received the proclamation on behalf of the Fridley Women of Today
and stated she would like to see Safe Rids Week praeticed every day.
NATIONAL BuSINESS WOI�N'S WEEK - OCTOBER 18, 1987:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, read this proclamation whieh was
issued by Mayor Nee.
Since no one was present to receive the proclamation, Mayor Nee stated it
would be mailed.
APPRUTAL OF MINUTES•
COUNCIL I�ETING, SEPTEI�IDER 28, 1987:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Couneilman Goodspeed. IIpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded
by Couneilman Schneider. Opon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee -
declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS•
-1-
COtJNCIL I�ETING OF OCTOBER 5. 1987
Mr. Ross Daly, Editor of the Fridley Focus, extended an invitation to the
City Couneil to attend their open house in Fridley on Oetober 7 from �1 to 7
p.m.
OLD Bi�S INESS :
1. ORDINANCE N0. 896 ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988:
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the County arrived at a settlement with �
Medtronie regarding the issue of the assessed valuation. He stated as a
result oP this settlement, the City lost $12.7 million of assessed valuation
and a total loss in revenue of about $157,000 for 1988 taxes. Mr. Qureshi
stated $25, 283 is being taken from the General Fund reserve and the bal anee
is proposed to be obtained from an increase in the mill rate from 1�.7 to
15.3 mills.
Councilman Goodspeed stated he Was going to request the second reading of
this ordinance be postponed because so much has transpired within the last
�eek with Sehool District 1� passing a referendum and the affeets of the
Medtronie issue on School District 16. He felt this Was a terrible time for
the City to be raising taxes and if the results of the Medtronic settlement
had been knoWn earlier, there probably Would have been significant cuts made
in the City budget. He stated he understands by raising the mill rate to
15.3, it Would mean approximately $10 a year more in taxes for an average
home in Fridley. He stated because the Council is required, by law, to
consider passage on the budget this evening, he didn't feel it would be
appropriate to start budget cuts at this point.
Councilman Fitz patrick stated School District 1�4 taxpayers will have a 6 or
7 mill inerease in their taxes in the next year and Sehool Distriet 13 had a
10 mill raise payable in 1987 whieh Will continue . He fel t when the City
loses this amourit of revenue and the budget has to be certified next week,
this is the purpose of the reserves.
Councilman Sehneider stated when reviewing his tax statement, he marvels
that his taxes are about the same as they kere 16 years ago When he first
moved to Fridley. He fel t governmental bodies in the area were doing a
fairly good job of holding the line on spending. He stated the loss of
revenue is serious, but believed this Couneil was suecessful in keeping a
very stable mill rate and hasn't drastically ehanged the number of City
employees. Councilman Schneider stated he felt reserves are to be used for
these situations. He felt as the Council goes into next year, all
alternatives have to be reviewed, but Would support using the reserves and
raising the mill rate.
Cauncilwoman Jorgenson stated the Couneil was aware there woul d be a
settlement with Medtronie, but didn't think it would be that drastie. She
stated there is no Way the Couneil can begin to review the budget this
evening and cut $157,000 Without severely damaging the capability of the
City. She stated she feels somewhat pressured this ordinanee has to be
passed at this meeting.
-2-
COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 1987
Councilman Fitz patriek stated he did not mean to be eritical of the S ch ool
Board as he lrnows they have their own problems. He stated the point is the
taxpayer doesn't differentiate What portion of their tax Was raised.
MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No.
896 and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by
Couneilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
2. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
COI�IISS ION'S •
MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to table this item. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
NEW BUS INESS :
3. ITEM FROM THE MINtTTES OF Ti� APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 22�_
1987:
A. COIZSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #87-31 TO REDUCE THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 25 FEET TO ALLfJW THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A 10 FOOT BY 15 FOOT ADDITION ON LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCR 1, HILLCREST
ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7231 EAST RNER ROAD N.E., BY DAVID FO%:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Direetor, stated the code requires a
minimum front yard depth of 35 feet to allow for off-street parking without
eneroaching on the public right-of-Way and also for aesthetie purposes. He
stated the petitioner's hardship is he would like to add an entry-xay to
serve as a�eather barrier and reduce energy loss. Mr. Robertson stated the
petitior�r would also like to add office space for an in-home business and
his finances will not allow for two additions so he would like to eombine
both into a two-level addition.
Mr. Robertson stated the code allows for a five foot encroachment into the
required front qard setbaek of 35 feet, if the total area of the addition
does not exeeed 50 square feet. Iie stated because the petitiorier wishes to
construet a 10 by 15 foot addition, he has requested the variance. Mr.
Robertson stated the present setback from East River Road right-of-Way is
�35 feet, however, beyond the 35 feet from the petitioner's existing home is
a 50 foot right-of-Way Por tiie future extension of Ashton Avenue. He stated
this Would serve as a service road and would eliminate the private driveway
access onto East River Road fr� the east side. Mr. Robertson stated there
are no immediate pl ans for this to take pl ace, hot�+ever, it eould happen at a
later date.
Mr. Robertson stated at tiie Appeals Commission meeting, the petitioner Was
asked if he could add on to the back of his home. He stated tiie petitioner
advised the Commission he had eonstructed a very extensive deck which covers
almost the full length of the baek of his home and iP he were to add on to
the back, he would have to tear down almost the entire deek.
-3-
COIINCIL I�ETING OF OCTOBER 5. 1987
Mr. Robertson stated at the Appeals Commission meeting� the Chairman, Mr.
Betzold, stated that the Ashton Avenue/East River Road matters are policy
decisions that he was not comfortable making and felt the final deeision
should be made by the City Couricil. He stated Mr. Betzold, therefore, voted
against the motion to approve this varianee in order that the request would
go to the Council for their final decision.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if there is 135 feet from East River Road to
this property line. Mr. Robertson stated there is 135 feet from the front
of the home to East River Road.
Couneilman Fitzpatrick stated there is public right-of-way of 100 feet and
if the time ever comes to extend Ashton Avenue, he felt tllere is sufficient
space to work within this amount of right-of-way.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the
Appeals Commission and grant variance, VAR #87-31, to reduce the front yard
setbaek from 35 feet to 25 feet to allow the contruetion oP a 10 by 15 foot
addition at 7231 East River Road N.E. Seconded by Couneilman Goodspeed.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously. �
Mr. Fox, the petitioner, stated if Ashton Avenue is proposed to be extended,
it would be opposed by everyone on the bloek. He stated because Ashton
Avenue is a cul-de-sae, ehildren use it for their activities such as roller
skating, playing games, ete. He stated the people living on this bloek do
not want the additional traffic an extension of this street would bring.
Councilman Fitapatrick stated he doesn't see Ashton Avenue as an element in
this varianee request.
Mr. Fox stated he has seen a drawing that conneets Ashton Avenue all the way
to the service station.
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated there wasn�t an official proposal to extend
Ashton Avenue, but there �as discussion about eliminating private driveway
access onto East River Road.
4. RESOLiJTION NO 75-1987 CERTIFYING CERTAIN DELIN�UENT WATER AND SEWER CHARGES
TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH THE 1988 TAXES:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 75-1987. Seconded by
CouneilWOman Jorgenson. IIpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
deelared the motion carried unanimously.
Couneilman Schneider stated perhaps the City should be looking at raising
the penalty fee because it isn't in the City's interest to be in the
finaneing business.
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated staff could possibly review to
determi� if this �aould be a revenue raising teehnique. He stated these
aecounts represent less than 2 peroent of the Water and sewer charges of the
-�-
COtJNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 5. 1987
City.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated out of 8,000 homes, only 200 are oertif ied to
the County for collection with the taxes.
5. RESOLOTION NO 76-1987 CERTIFYING CHARGES TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO BE LEV IED
AGAIKST CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR COLLECTION WI_TH THE TA%ES PAYABLE IN 1988
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 76-1987. Seeonded
by Couneilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
deel ared the motion carried unanimously.
6. RESOLUTION NO 77-1987 AIITHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL
ASSESSI�NTS ON PART OF LOTS 16 AND 17, AUDITOR'S SUBDNISION �88 (PIN N0. 13
�0 2� �4 0016 AND 0017 ). AND APPORTIONING PART INTO REG IS TE RED LAND S URV EY
#100•
MOTION by Couneilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 77-1987. Seconded
by Couneilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
7. RESOLUTION NO 78-1987 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL
ASSESSI�NTS ON PARCEL 3000, SECTION 2, AND APPORTIONING INTO SPRINGBROOK
APARTI�NTS AT NORTHTOWN:
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to adopt Resolution No. 78-1987. Seconded by
Councilman Sehneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
8. RESOLUTION NO 79-1987 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING AND COI�INING
OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON• PART OF LOT 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDNZSION #89:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 79-1987 • Seconded by
Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
9. RESOLUTION NO 80-1987 DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPRCN ING JUDGES FOR
THE NWEI�ER 3. 1987 GENERAL ELECTION:
MOTION by Councilman ScYineider to adopt Resolution No. 80-1987. Seconded by
Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aqe, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
10. RESOLUTION NO 81-1987 CERTIFYING TA% LEVY REQUIREMENTS FOR 1988 TO THE
COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR COLLECTION:
MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 81-1987. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. CONSIDERATION OF 1988 COIINCIL I�ETINGS AND HOLIDAY SCHEDULE:
-5-
COITNCIL I�ETING OF OCTOBER 5, 1987
Councilwoman Jorgenson requested that the Conference Meeting seheduled for
Halloween night, October 31, be deleted.
MOTION by Councilman Sehneider to approve the 1988 Council Meetings and
Holiday Sehedule, with the deletion of the October 31 ConPerenee Meeting.
Seconded by Couneilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
12. CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatriek to authorize payment of Claims No. 16728
through 16837. Seconded by Couneilman Schneider. Opon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion earried unanimously.
13. LICENSES:
MOTION by Couneilman Sehneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as
on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
14. ESTIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to approve the estimates as submitted:
Herrick � Newman, P.A.
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NA1 55�32
For Services Rendered as City Attorney
for the Month of September, 1987. . . . . . . . . . � 1,83�•�5
Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Haskvitz
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, 1�4d 55�32
For Services Rendered as City Prosecutor
for the Month of August 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7, 828.50
Seconded by Councilman Sehneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Couneilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the
Fridley City Couricil of October 5, 1987 adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
�
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE TfiE
CITX COUNCIL
1
?Jotice is her�eby given that the Fridley City Council will meet on Monday,
Septenber 1 k, 1987 in the City Council Chambers, at 6431 University Avenue,
:Iortheast, Fridley, Minnesota 55�32 to hold a public hearing on the proposal
fron rlortel Cable Associates for a renewal of its cable television franchise.
The City Council will take com�ents upon the following:
1. Whether Plortel has substantially complied with
Waterial terms of the existing franchise.
2. �dhether the quality of T�ortel's service has been
reasonable in light of community needs.
3. Whether tiortel's proposal is reasonable to meet the
future cable-related community needs and interests,
t2king into account the eost of ineeting such needs and
ir_terests.
Copies of P�ortel Cable Assaciates proposal for cable television frar.ehise
rer.ewal are available for public inspection at City Hall. Any and all
Ferscns desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above
stated tine and pl ace .
LJILLIAM J. NEE
rAYOR
Publi�h: August 24, 1987
August 31, 1987
: z
__. A�LIC HEARIl� '
�f � "
BE�RE 7HE r .,;� ..�� .-
. .. . . < .�r "'j � .
Q� �J�r+ ���z. .
��
�� Y.
.. � . . . . � . . � � . . � rs' ;� �.�,,. .. .. . .
� �����r���.��� � 4 � . . .
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public 8earing of the City
Council of the City of FricIley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue "
Northeast cn Nbnday, October 19, 1987 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m.
for the purpose of :
Consideration of a Vacation, SAV #87-09, by Gregory
Mortenson, to vacate the 6 foot drainage ease�nent on the
.
nor th side of Lot 3, Block 2, Hea th er H il l s Second
A�3ition, the same being 6191 Rerry Lane N.E.
Arry and all persons desiring to be heard shall be giv� an opportinity at the
above stated time and plaoe.
WII�LIP,M J. I�E
1�YOR
Publish: October 7, 1987
October 14, 1987
I _
: . :�:.
�f�
�.�.
: ,� �
�
�
��
. �
PL�aWNING COM�4ISSION MEETI�JG, SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 - PAGE 8
-- MOTIO�J by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Betzold, to recommend to Gity ��
ounci denial of lot split, t.S. �87-08, by William Henle .,
- �-
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BI GS DECLARED THE ''�``
MOTIOPJ CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. �_��
� � � � - ���
Ms. Sherek stated she did not feel a 58 , lot width would be in keeping�
with the neighborhood, and she thou that was something they should :
emphasize to the City Council.
MOTIOt� by Mr. Kondrick, se nded by Mr. Betzold, to direct Staff to brinq
it to the City Council' attention that a 68 ft, lot width in this neighbor-
hood would not be i eeping with the neighborhood and the Planning Comnission
would be opposed a lot split for a 68 ft. wide lot also.
UPON A VOI VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTIO��
CAltRIED NIMOUSLY. -
Robinson stated this item would go to City Council on
3. COt�SIDERATION OF A VACATION, SAV #81-09, BY GREGORY MORTENSON:
o vacate t e oot ra�nage easement on t e nort si e o ot 3, Block 2,
Heather Hills Second Addition, the same being 6191 Kerry Lane N.E.
' Mr. Robinson stated this property was located on the east side of Kerry Lane
in the 6100 block. The petition was to vacate a 6 ft. drainage/utility
easement located on the north side of the property. The petitioner also
requested a variance. Originally, the variance was not only to allow the
existing encroachment of an existing garage from 5 ft. to 4.6 ft., but also
for a proposed expansion of living area in the rear of the home for a side
yard setback from 10 ft. to 4.4 ft. On Sept. l, the Appeals Comnission
recommended denial of the side yard setback but did sup�rn^t the variance for
the existing garage. On Sept. 14, the Cit,y Council approved both variances.
At this time, the petitioner was seeking to vacate this easement in order
to clean up the tfitle with the existing garage being in that easement.
Mr. Robinson stated the Commission had received a memo from the Public Works
Department supporting the vacation of the drainage/utility easement and that
the vacation should nc,t create any problems in terms of storm water, and there
were no utilities in the easement.
Mr. Robinson stated the Cor,mission had also received a letter dated Sept. 1,4
from Larry and Kathleen Morford at 6235 Kerry Lane stating they were ful���
aware of Mr. Mortenson's building plans and had no objections. ,� :� r
. � . . . .. � . � =a_ �. .
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Svanda, to receive the letter from
a�rry� Kathleen Morford.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLIN�S DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLAWNItJG COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 PA�E 9
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council
approval o� vacation, SAV #87-09, by Gregory Mortenson, to vacate the 6:_,foot
drainage easement on the north side of Lot 3, Block 2, Heather Ni17s �` �.
Second Addition, the same being 6191 Kerry Lane N.E. , ��-
� . . . . . . . . y����� -•
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLIt�GS DECLARED THE^MQi`IQN
CARRIED Ut�ANIMOUSLY. - +' f '
�-�.
4. PISBtIC NEARING: CONSIDERATIOPi OF RECODIFICA7ION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
r r, r. n i t R I S B S H t S I F I E E S E
�ILI�fIES I�J INDUSTRIAL ZONES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to open the publi hearing.
UPOt� A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSO�J BILLIt�GS DECLA D THE MOTIO�J
CARRIED U��At�IMOUSLY. . ,
Mr. Robinson stated that approximately two months ago�, S ff brought to the
Planning Commission the idea of altering the F1-1 and M sections of the
Zoning Code to allow for some limited commercial typ uses in office/ware-
house mixed use type buildings. After several mee ngs and discussions, they
arrived at the present draft ordinance which was e subject of this public
hearing.
Mr. Robinson stated the reasons for the cha es were that the econoirpr has
changed to a more service economy and the on's share of the development in
Fridley over the past five years has be in the office/warehouse market.
He listed a few of the developers, bot existing and proposed: River Road
Business Center; Winfield Deve]opmen at 73rd & University; Harris' office/
warehouse directly behind Winfield evelopment; proposed Rosewood construction
at Osborne and Main; M-D Propert" s at 83rd and Main.
Mr. Robinson stated also und construction or presently built, the City
had approximately 3/4 milli sq. ft. of office/r�arehouse development. These
developments have been of igh quality, both in terms of architectural treat-
ment and in site develo ent. They have been good additions to the tax base
plus the urban fabric
Mr. Robinson stat the City has had numerous concerns and requests fro�n
these developers regarding the limitations imposed upon them in acquiring
tenants which uld benefit the development and the area at large and which,
on the surfa , would not be detrimental to the area. In order to make;, ��.,':
Fridley mor marketable and more in tune with today's development, the �'� `"
present o inance was being proposed. ��s� �
,� -
_ �»� �4f�~
� �: w� -�
_ ,, �,_: :
Mr. Ro �nson stated that at the request of the Planning Corrnnission, not�ces
were ent to a'll developers, both existing and proposed. The Citv also made
a resentation to the Chamber of Cort�nerce on September 10, 1987.
�
SAV #8?-09 ��
SAV 4�87-09 6191 Kerry Lane NE. Gregory M�ortenson
x .� �. �:. �. . k ,� �;: - � �...
%� --7�- . 9 ..; �� � ws� i�: `'1 � _
� � {-� � .K r. �
:T? �. t. " :r�. `�� . � �' e4F' s �� � ��� •��� � •� ( �
'S
�
� ; "�/ �.; Y., ,<� ,. .n �/1 Ii�4r, �}. �
. ii.s ' �i{.�i •FYI.�uI:. I . >-�E . * , .
i .s .*D, IAIT. , � . T � �. 1.
- .�.—�. , . �.
��� � ��!�� ,�' ��� � �} ` , = 4�� ..(�a1�, �� � �' s/`��' 4a
�3 . ll+�/' Q%!8C3►; (!DO„1 �p�q�`� �qlt;� �4► ' � �E .f , j . j � �V 0."
'r �.���, �� � �J�L� .� �.
'!4, "1z� /o� • 8.,.. 6 .i¢, Z :o `�o:fM� ��-��
; ' ,. ; . : - _.. - _ .r.�►.i► �
� . . . . .. ,�„ � `� K . .
,
� . . . �� .. � . � � . . �NV (�i _
�
_-� • . • . . . d. / . . .. .
. i . . � i � � � .. � � - 7 (I � .
� . � ' - � � � � .. . ` �� �
'1 � ,Zl /Zi • /Z .i i /.tl �� �
� � �� /JiR ' � . ..� . - � � � :t � .'_2 :... .
• ;si �
. i
� { � � N � � �(c) j' (�i �• ��^ ''�(i�g) �� (�i,
�,� / ; � l 10 G�q, � � � �
�U � - � _ Z � � J r.�„�.✓ � �:r.� l_� �- � �
�`� u� �� <� : : !�... � ON,�� IO
� } ����v) �OiS� 1 � t ; ,f _ �. ��� H/r� • �, � �
K � �
� � 5 ` !.r /� �M a�l � '
I ,«.�,.��s� ✓� � !M) � - � , � �
� _-„ . � � � '.(� �
i � • . � �' J �i �'A � �'ir,so,� �jr�
� � � S 1 �3 p I 1� i= }`
� � � � �. �VE; � (�w � �' � � �
�' � '' ��•��,. ,,,! . � `� �: ,. C'�
; ' ►� ��, <� :._ : . , � w000�oE cT. s , ,
�R ,j� � �
ae- " ly�� �.e � � s(�+� xa� '°� i � 2C
� � p�, � ' �� ' � (�
' / �� [� • � V
e �l '�� � . � � � y�j � r�'� � k V � � '`� � � '!
j SUB. ~ � / ,� Ls!� ' l� Y G �.� � �
,; �•� s, B _ '4' � ♦ � �(�bl � � � � � � � 3 ; ,�w►•.� .� , ��
� v' U .!/ r1 _ _ r! - N �B . !S .
. . .... � �Q�/J/ QO : w:y� � � ...���: •ii � ` .
'!6�
� �� R��� � q � R , IR•: �3 , , e Y �
� : �. ` � . ;� � /r�>
s . � �: ' ` •gZ� ° � �n G .. ��� � (� : 9(1�> � �`�, t 8 � �J Z�
,� � *�� IO�� �`� 4 ��p� �} V � � � „�
�'�� /lt. .� � . �. � v J � . . � � �� � � .
a,z+�"'� y gy� N � (4?� . .� ''/' �`,•: ' � ....... _. . .
� . .v
\ : M . „d�ff�y,r. ••ee►n-.vr✓
1��0�9�!
�� rl ", � .� C • C�� .R i -t'• �r/�K•Jir• +
V � � (8!)e �/ �t I C�Js ' �� � ��� , �AX ��
� �� � �)
� �, ,,� ,� - �-,..... .K Hx e � " - � (� • x
� ..�oi � a ri' � IP � PARK �
,' �
�� (�) � . '�`` ,��;�t ' /...... � (� �
.
6 � y � ��� , : * • . ,- : � f . �'�
.,.
� . � : ': s �ui� . > - .�_;, �•
. .
�. . ,
:
.� . , .
i a . -:: � r� ' ti, . . � - � r� "' ��
`` �� � r �f.mv� � ... � , ' � • � , ,�..�,w,� �
.,�,,,. '' �ro F� l� t�
, �: ' �: P �' _.t . ��� (^�c� . !� �
•� _ � � . � /O •
�. � ��' 3 , '� p 4 �J. *. 9
« �J , � . t •� �.
y � � _ . f ��S':," +i. T
?!o t '�S
... ..._ . . �. , ... . .. ••
i A': .�r „ t. •..� . � r` : JCN• •NL �"y /%,' • .iI�A► "'. .`
. � '. . . � . •.�.�. -� '::a '�1 :�'7R ��_�._._—_'_'' - �.�_... . . . ._�._ .
LOCATtON MAP
_� __ _ _ _---- _.,_�_ _--
._ . _ -----
-1-
� "� � �O� � �
F � Q'� o,h . ( I
�0 � ��``�j� I � � ;
� N � (
� _-122.14 - `
' `��1 � � S 68� 46' 34.,E
" — �•=-2 ��,�g � — - = ' - - - - - 190.37 - -
; �/; - � � _�. 59 33�� SO.Oi . ...,r::::�:r:. .
= � JFt = 325 �r 26
�3`` �
�E ,. .Q$
G��G � 2 � 33 3
o L� g1.22
;,�q,�,� �19� 0�� 211 . ' 140.36
7"' �. '
9, :�,.
�2 UNDERGROUNO ��„ -�
D' T�.ITY EASEMENT • ' ' ~
6� . , , •i � o
6 � • . _
� g o� 2
' . .. � � �� .
N� " �N �
�. ,� �
� o�
�c' °� °ti° ° ' � W
g � � -N � .�
ORAINAGE ' 10
EASEMEN � � .
� O. {
� 69�� � .
-�� �0 ��. ` �
'-�3l.6 � s�, . �,6
' ry �o�, 3pI, w �� �' e `,h
- =-140. 36 - -
�►' �'` N 88 46 34 W
, p h , � -__iao.3s ---
� ,, .
SAV #87-09
Gregory rbrterLSOn 1Q
-- - ---1-
:t :
�, :ti.•
(�, �T
-� ..
... .:.: .•: ��
. ; , �
,, � �.
� �; ��„
�`�� , ` ��..'�..
�:
��
� M
6 -�
N N
N
� : � �
� O
m
� � � �
w' �+' � W �
;�Q N .
�• W
CW'� �' N F'
=�No�
a �
� ` � a
�o
W W
z �
.ti J W
r� N �
�••'~ W �
i
�B ° � I � �
►
46• 1
c_.�_._� — !
se � oa°ti a' a • . I
BFs, r. � a �h �'� � �
`�r �• . a� ��
_ � (
'143.32 �� y
.'�2 � =�
A0 �
� � � � � � � ����
. . �� � "
O OENOTES IRON MONUMENT �� ".
� . ALL BEARINGS ASSUMED
SCALE � 1'�= 50'
S ITE PLA N
. _ .�
_
_. � �� . __ .. _ �_ . _� _ __ _ ._ , .� .-: --- _ _ :. _
. � ._�.. , _ _ _ � .
SAV #57-09
Surveyors Certificate
COMSTOCK & DAVIS, [NC. Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors
1446 County Road J. Mpls., Minn. 55432. 784-9346
SU•PYE Y UF. ' SU•PYEY FU� •'
GGT .�i, BLO�,r t M/w'E O'/.��v.vO.v -
/�/�I'•or/�I�.P ivicL.� .�ECGa+t.i0 4.o�0��ip,V S?Q0 �iL<iw0.0� S�^ ia�t �
�'iP/OLi�Y. /l//.v.Vl.folA �yI/A.I^.tEA�O�/t�A//.t/�i/lSOTiI
f6�P/
; �'�.
.'sd �
� � .
�
�
�
V
�
�
�
�
,�
— --- - --- --- -- —
� �
� Q �
� d
,���
Q�t
W
. �,
I
�� �
�
�
,—r ���
�.rs��E.c�rs�
I �I /•�O. 3!0
I Sv �
OESG'�?/.�T/U�L/. '
c o r 3, a� a c.r ?. N�.�>•�✓E.o s��c a s .s�c'o.vo .�coirio.ci
,./.v0�•4 C!�[/�t/s'Y� Mi.vit/6JOTi4
-- - - �S'!/B✓iCr rC �AJCiYI/'N>.T �/r' IPlrCO.PO.
SCALE: / ".� .30 '
p oE-.vor�-s i�t�v nac�•vu.,�F.vr s�r /_ - 7- 7 a
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
� /o8,i Z ��3/�77 37'/4�
Reg. No. Date Job No.
�
�
�
ORDINANCE NO.
DRDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 30
ENTITI.ED CI�IARITABLE GAMBLING BY AMENDING SECTION 30.03. '��,�,,
ADDING NEG1 SECTION 30.04 AND RENUMBERING CONSECUTIVELY ''��
'��� �
. � . � . ' ��3 . .
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLAWS: ��"
30.03. PULL-TABS SALES //IN ON-SALE CHAPTER 603 PREMISES// IN CITY
//1. Twenty cents of each dollar of gross receipts from lawful gambling
within the city shall be pledged and contributed to lawful purposes as defined
in Minnesota statutes (1984) Chapter 349.12 subd.11, (a)(b) and (c), of which
four cents shall be appropriated to the city for distribution to charitable
purposes, six cents shall be distributed to organizations for city charitable
purposes, and the remaining ten cents shall be used for all other lawful
purposes or expenses.//
1. Ten percent (10$) of the or�anization's net profit derived from lawful
gambling shall be contributed to or�anizations located within the city of
Fridley for charitable purposes. Net profits are determined as defined by
Minnesota Statutes.
30.04. LOCAL GAMBLING TAX
A local gamblinR tax of three percent (3$) of the gross receipts from
gamblin�, less prizes actually paid by the organization, shall be paid to the
city for the purpose of re�ulatin� said �ambling.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY CQUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
OF , 1987.
ATTEST:
I SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication: '
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
DAY
-°�
_ ,:�
p, � �
j..
,_.r:-
.i=' : .
4
;
_�� POLICE DEPARTMENT
���� � ' b City of Fridley
' ' �- Minnesota
�..
DATE OCTOBER 7, 1987
FROM PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR, J. IL
SUBJECT
CHARITABLE GAMBLING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
MEMORANDUM
TO
NASIM QURESHI
Enclosed�are suggested amendments to our Charitable Gambling
Ordinance for Council consideration.
: �.
'�;:
ACT10N INFO
X
During the 1987 Legislative session, the Minnesota Legislature
amended the Charitable Gambling Statute: which now prohibits
the City of Fridley from requiring distribution of profits as
currently specified in City Code 30.03 subd. 1.
The proposed amendments is deleting all of current City Code
30.03 subd. 1 and replacing that language with the requirement
that 10$ of the organization net profit derived from lawful
gambling be contributed to organizations located within the
City of Fridley for charitable purposes. This inclusion is
permitted by State Statute and is the maximum allowed for the
city to specify.
In addition, the Legislature now allows the city to impose a
local gambling tax not to exceed 3$ of gross receipts from
gambling, less prizes actually paid by the organization, to
be utilized by the city for purposes of regulating said gambling.
The local gambling tax provision has also been included in our
suggested amendment to Chapter 30 of the Fridley City Code.
No additional licenses or fees may be charged to the organization
if a local gambling tax provision is required.
The proposed amendments have been reviewed by Fridley City
Attorney Virgil Herrick and discussed with the Fridley Lions
Club, the only organization currently operating pull tab operations
in the city. R
�
JPHjsa
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PIANNING COMMISSION MEE7ING, OCTOBER 7, 1987 :
CALL TO ORDER: '
Chairperson Billings called the October 7, 1987, Planning Commission meeting
to order at 7:30 p.m. t�`�>
F �#
ROLL CALL : ;;,�,�' .
�lenbers Present: Steve Qillings, Dave Kondrick, Bruce Qandaw (far �ean Saba),
Sue Sherek, Donald Betzold
!".enbers Absenf : : Ri chard Svanda
Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
APPROVAL OF SCPTCMBER 16, 1987, NLAF�NI��G CONMISSIOf� t1I��UTES:
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. SHERSK� TO APPROVF. TNE SEPTEMBER 16� 1987�
PLANNING �OMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIF,D UNANIMOUSLY.
1. CO��SID(:f'.ATION OF RECODIFICATIO�J OF THC CITY 0!' FRI�LEY 7_OPJINf, CODE
IR� INDUSTRIAL Z0�1E5:
s
Mr. P.obinson stated that after the discussion at. the last meeting, the
main issues seemed to be the size of the building in which they would
allow a special use permit for limited commercial establishments and also
thc� hours of operation, and the definition of the concept of what is a
mixed use office/industrial building.
Mr. Robinson stated a few of the developers at the last meeting expressed
a lot of concern that the majority of the buildings they have built over
the last 20 years would not qualify because they would not be large
enough to meet the 35,000 sq.ft. threshold. At that time, Staff stated
they would do an inventory of the existing industrial buildings in the
City, and Staff has now done that. From the address file, they pulled
out all the industrial properties in the City and graphed them. As the
Commission could see, 95 buildings out of 125 buildings would not meet
the 35,000 sq. ft, threshold, and 30 buildings would have qualified.; So�_
there were a limited amount of buildings that would qualify under the neW;;
ordinan.ce. Fram a percentage standpoint, 75� of the buildings would nat -
qualify and 25X would qualify under the new ordinance.
Mr. Robinson stated that in addition to that, Staff did a survey of the
tenants in all the industrial buildings. They discovered that the majarity
of the mixed use buildings are in the older industrial area of Fridley and
5
.
5A
PLMINI�l6 C0�'UIISSIOM MEETItlG OCTOBER 7 1987 PtIGE 2
are the buildings referred to by Dick Narris and Jave Harris at the last
meeting and which are the smaller multi-tenant buildings. The type of .
�` tenants that are in those buildings are much more manufacturing ariented.
There was nothing that would qualify as a business service type of use, wi.th
the exception of the automotive type businesses. The other tenants are �:.,
light industrial--fabrication, machine shops, and warehouses. �;
�
, A�,
Nr. Robinson sta.ted the true nixed use business centers are the East River
Road 6usiness Center, Winfield Development, Dave Narris' building across��
the street from the 4Jinfield Oeve.lopment, a building built by Jerry Paschke,
and the proposed Rosewood Developr�ent and M-D Properties.
t1r. Robinson stated the quasi-business centers--light irtanufacturing, ware-
house, and more service type businesses--are seen primarily between Commerce
Circle 4lest and Commerce Circle East and over by Old Central.
Mr. Robinson stated this gave the Commission an overview of the types of
tenants they think will take advantage of the new ordinance. In looking at
the other tenants and analyzing the criticism of this ordinance, they really
feel they can let the market dictate what goes in in those other industrial
buildings. No one is going to locate there; and if they do, they will probably
not last too long. He just could not see those areas supporting the types
of comr�ercial development which this ordinance would allow in there.
Mr. Billings stated that if the City allows a business (for example, a small
restaurant) to go into an industrial building and sometir�e later, the land-
lord rents out the adjacent space to some type of industrial use that will
be creating paint fumes or whatever, would there be any liability on the
part of the City if the restaurant owner came back to the City and claimed
he went out of business because the City had a lousy zoning ordinance and
allowed a conflicting business to move in next door?
Mr. Robinson stated that was a good point; however, first of all, that
business would have to get a special use permit and at that time the business
owner would be made aware of the fact that there was the potential for
other industrial uses adjacent to him, Secondly, that same scenario was
now possible under the existing ordinance in these r�ixed use service-type
buildings, not with a restaurant, but there could be, for example, a carpet
showroom or a copying business with an automotive business next door.
P1r. Robertson stated he and Nr. Robinson also discussed another scenario
of where a business owner might come back a couple of months later and _
say that no one was coming to his restaurant and he needed a hfgher sign.
Again, through the special use permit process, the City can inform the �
prospective tenant that there are certain rules, and if he wants to`operate
in an industrial area, he should be advised that it is not a commercial �.
district, and that the City sees the busit�ess as a service-type of funct�on.
P1r. Billings�asked if there was some way they could establish a policy
with some standard wordage that goes as a stipulation on the special use
permit whenever there are these kinds of requests.
PL/1NNING COttt1ISSI0�� NEETI�lG OCTOBER 7 1987 ' PAGE 3
P1r. Robertson stated one thing they think might work that if the 1and-
lord knows that the retail portion is only going to be a minor percentage '
of his tenants, again the market should work consistent with the City's
policy. The landlord is not going to put a business in that is going �i�
cause problems for his major tenants. „, ��? '
� � � � � � � ,�� _," ,�,..
Mr. Billings stated he could appreciate the fact that the market is gai'rig'`�
to dictate what goes into these buildings, but at the same time there _ar�e�
certain times when a, landlord might be looking for next month's rent so he
can make the payment. Or rnaybe the landlord has plans on selling the
building and is only concerned about having a tenant in the building. There
could be a lot of variables that get into this.
t1r. Betzold stated he felt the City has
explains fairly clearly what the City's
developers are limited to.
tried to make an ordinance that
intentions are and what the
t1r. Robertson stated maybe they.should be more explicit in the ordinance so
people are on notice that this is a special district and the City recognizes
there are certain risks businesses will be taking when they locate in these
industrial areas. -
�1r. Betzold stated he did not see anything wrong with putting into the
ordinance some wording that explains the reason for the ordinance.
'1r. Robinson stated that i� talking to other cities that have ordinances
sinilar to this, they make no distinction as to what types of businesses
(restaurants and other commercial) can go into these industrial buildings.
They just say any comnercial up to a certain percentage, and do not
even require a special use permit. He felt one thing they have to realize
here in Fridley was that they would be gra�-ting a blanket special use
permit up to 20� for these types of support services, so they would not have
the type of control with each individual tenant that !:r. Billings might be
referrrng to.
t1s. Sherek suggested that as a condition of granting the special use permit,
there be a stipulation that the owner of a building is responsible for
notification in writing to any prospective tenant before the lease is signed
that this is an industrial zone and the tenant's property might be subject
to odors, noise, etc., fror� this or surrounding properties in the industrial
zone. She stated it was the owner's responsibility, because no owner wants
tenants r�oving in and out repeatedly; therefore, it is in the owner's best
interest to get compatible tenants and keep ttier�. Then, if the tenant;cOmes
in and complains to the City, the City does not have the responsibilit,� ,�nd`'
the tenant can sue the owner of the building for not notifying him/her;df
,.��,�� .,
these things.
t1r. Robinson stated that sounded like a very gaod idea, and it could be
stated right in the ordinance.
C1'�
PLII��NItIG C0�1NISSIO�! NEETING OCTOBCF'. 7 1987 PA6F 4
t1r. Robertson stated that under H-2, Item 2 stated: "Commercial retail -
and service uses and Class I restaurants within office/industriaT buildtngs
which are`supplemental to and far the convenience of the operation of the
zoning district and which provide goods and services which are primarily .=
for the use of persons employed in that district." So, this describes:; `
what the purpose of these retail uses are. `,� �
�r
: ��;
Mr. Robinson stated �another change. made in the ordinance was they had �
replaced the definition that said "Office/industrial mixed use buildings"
with "office/industrial buildings." That took into account all industrial
buildings.
t1r. Robinson stated they deleted any hours of operation.
Mr. "obinson stated that under item 3.A., they changed the cuMUlative
percentage allowed from 20� to 30X. It was still 20% for the support-type
businesses, but the other types of commercial have_-gone up an additional
10" to allow more commercial in those particular areas.
Mr. Robinson stated that on the last page under the definitions, they were
now stating in which zones the Class I, Class II, and C1.ass III restaurants
could gq. Prior to that, no restaurants were allowed in a C-1 zone.
MOTION BY MS. SHEREK� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� THAT RI�IDER SECTION 205.17.
M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND UNDER SECTION 205.18. HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS, THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE SHOULD BE ADDF,D AS
C.2.d. and C.3.g:
"IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR AGENT TO INFORM ANY
PROSPECTIVE TENANT TXAT THE PROPERTY IS ZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL USE."
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYF.� CNAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARF.D TN.E M.OTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY MS. SHEREK, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO PASS ON TO THE CITY
COUNCIL THE ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODF, TO ALLOW LIMITED
COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS IN OFFICE/WARENOUSE FACILITIES IN INDUSTRIAL ZQNES
AS AMENDED AND TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL SET A PUBLIC XEARING DATE.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V02ING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLZNGS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. RECEIVC AUGUST 25, 1987, ENCRGY CONMISSION MIPIUTES:
�.:.
�:�:
MOTION BY MR. BONDOW, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO RBCF.IVF. THE AUG. 25� I987�
ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES. ,' �
UPON A VOICE,VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED TNE MOTZON
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5C
�
PL{WNI�lG CONt!ISSIO�! MEETIN6 OCTOBER 7, 1'3a7 PRCE 5
3. RECEIVG SEPTEM!BER 17, 1987, HUF1A�� RCSOURCES CONNISSIOP! MItlUTES:
MOTION BY XS. SHEREK� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� 2b RECEIVE THE SEPT. IT 2987�
� �,
HUl'fAN RF.SOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. -'`��
7 �.��,fµ���.,.,.
UPON A VOICE VOTF., ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINCS DECLARED TAS X ON
CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. � " �� ''��
. .. � . . f.G: � ,
4. RECCIVE SCPTE�tBER 22, 19i37, APPEALS COMMISSIOPJ �1I�tUTCS:
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO RECEIVF. THS SEPT. ?2� Z987,
APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N BILLINGS DECLARED THF.1�tOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. .
ADJOURNP1EPJT:
MOTION BY MS. SHEREK, SECONDSD BY MR. BETZOLD, TO ADJOURN THF. MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE OCT. 7� 1987�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AAJOURNED AT 8:20 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lynn Saba
Recording Secretary
- ��.
:` 4�,�. �
� ��:r
,� �„^
�;:� :�
�4 .°t': �� � �
�:
� �."':tir:'m` . .
�
�
cinroF
fRIDLEY
i
I�£ND �:
r�rn Fxor�:
NEl�D L�1TE :
R�ARDING :
PLANNIhiG DIVIStON
MEMC� R,ANDUM
� �.��
���
Jock Robertson, Co�rim�ity Develognent Director ��
�,-�y.
�;,� .
Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator� �~-'� .
�{
October 14, 1987
Setting Public Hearing for Reo�dification of the Code to A11aw
Limited Cor►�nercial in Industrial Zones
The Fridle� Planning Co�nission has recently o�mple�ted work on an ordinance
recodifying the Fridley Zoning Code by amending the industrial sections of
the Code to allaw for a limited amount of commercial type businesses in
incl�strial buildings.
Ztie Ordinance has been ulder study for approximately three months and was the
subject of a public hearing where extensive input was reoeived fran numerous
developers within the City of Fridley. In addition. staff made a
presentation to the Chamber of C,�meroe regarding the ordirsanoe on September
10, 1987. •
Zt�e purpose of the ordinance is to create a more competitive atmosphere as
far as attracting tenants to develognents within the inch�strial zones. Over
the gast five years the majority of the new developnent in the City of
Fridley has been mixed use business/service type develognents. These
developnents would be the primary ber�eficiary of this ordinance change. By
maving the barrier which differentiates between the allowed uses in the
commercial and industrial zones it is hoped that Fridley's developnent
climate will beor�me mare o�mpetitive and more vonsistent with those in other
ci ti es.
�he Planning Conanission has passed on this ordir�noe and re�ended that the
City Co�cil schedule a public hearing for it's review.
• .�
1�-87-205
�-;; .
� ��:
. �,,
�: �3:
:���
ORl?INANCE N0. �
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FBIDLBY CITY CODE, CHAPTER
205 ENTITLED 'ZONING" BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205.03.,
205.13., 205.14., 205.17. and 205.18 AND BY RENUMBERING
THE NEXT CONSECUTIVE NUMBERS.
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows:
205.03. DEFINITIONS • -�
- .; �,� .
14. Commercial Recreation ��}
>..�
A place where leisure time activities includint�, but not limited to, heaZth
clubs, racquet clubs, billiard halls and bowling alleys, but not including
massa�e parlors, are o£fered to the general public for a fee.
59. Restaurant
An establishment where meals can be purchased by the public for a fee and
include the followin� types:
A Class I restaurants include anv sit down type restaurant which does
not sell or serve liquor and where food is served to a customer and
consumed primarily on the vremises Includes, but not limited to,
cafeterias where food is selected by the customer while Roing through a
service line.
B. Class II restaurants include any restaurant which has 25� or more of
their sales taken away from the premises for consumption and which may
serve beer and/or wine for consumption on the premises. Includes, but
not limited to, take-out pizza parlors and fast food establishments.
C Class III restaurants include any sit down tvpe restaurant which
serves intoxicating liquor for consumption on the premises.
D. Drive-in t e restaurants include an restaurant that sells serves
or offers goods or services directly to customers who are either waitin�
in parked vehicles or who return to their vehicles to consume or use the
goods or services while on the premises.
205.13 C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGUTATIONS
1. USES PERMITTED
A, Principal Uses.
The following are principal uses in C-1 Districts:
(7) Class I Restaurants.
C. Uses Permitted With A Special Use Permit.
The following are uses permitted with a Special Use Permit in
C-1 Districts:
(11) Class II Restaurants.
_ �;�;,.
�
�
Ordinance No.
Page Two
205.14 C-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGULATIONS
1. USES PERMITTED
A. Principal Uses.
The fal2owing are principal uses in C-2 Districts:
(5) Al2 types of restaurants, not including "drive-ins".
205.17 H-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGUTATI013S
1. USES PERMITTED
C. Uses Permitted With A Special Use Permit.
��°�` ``�_.
� ���s�.
M �J� �
� x:,
„fi i"
-%,� .
� '
} %�
The following are uses permitted with a Special Use Permit in M-1
Districts:
(1) Offices not associated with a principal usej/.j/ provided that:
(a) The parkin� supply be in compliance with the requirements of
Section 205.17.5. of the City Code and be sufficient to support
full occupancy of the building. Parking requirements shall be
determined by the City for each tenant prior to occupancy.
(2) Commercial retail, service uses and Class I restaurant uses
within office and/or industrial buildin�s which are supplemental to,
and for the convenience of, the operation of the zoning district and
which provide qoods and services which are primarily for the use of
persons employed in that district, provided that:
�a) The maximum �ross floor area occupied by all such uses doe__s
not exceed� 20 percent of the total gross floor area of the
buildin�, with no individual tenant exceeding 3,000 square feet;
(b) The parkin� supply be in compliance with the requirements of
Section 205.17.5., of the City Code and be sufficient to support
full occupancy of the building. Parking requirements shall be
determined by the City for each tenant prior to occupancy;
(c) Only wall mounted si�ns, subject to the limitations of
Section 214 of the City Code, be permitted.
(d) The buildin� owner and/or agent is responsible for informin�
any prospective tenant that the property is zoned for industrial
use.
i; r � `
�3} Commercial retail and service uses within office'and/oY
industrial buildi
�n� those with drive-through compo
such as banks, cleaners, photo shops, Class II restaurants;""�rid
similgr uses, provided that: ;_.
.:�a) The maximum gross floor area occupied by such use and all
`other commercial uses, as permitted by special use permit, does
not exceed 30$ of the buildings total floor area with no such
individual tenant exceeding 5,000 square feet;
�
Ordinance No.
Page Three
(b) The parkin� supply be in compliance with the requirements
of Section 205 17 5 of the City Code and be sufficient to
support full occupancy of the buildin�;
(c) Only wall mounted si�ns, subiect to the limitations of
- Section 214 of the City Code, be permittedt
(d) The proposed use shall only be permitted when iC can be
demonstrated that their operation will not �enerate such level of
traffic so as to reduce "The Existing Level of Service",�:;�s
defined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, on streets at
intersections;
�e) The proposed use, in the opinion of the City Council, would
be compatible with the area in which it is proposed to be
located;
�f) All such uses be considered only on an individual, tenant
specific basis; and
�g) The buildinA owner and/or a�ent is responsible for informin�
any prospective tenant that the property is zoned for industrial
use.
(4) Commercial recreation uses subiect to the conditions outlined in
3b - 3� above, except tenant maximum Rross floor area and percent of
total buildin� occupied shall be considered on an individual tenant
specific basis.
205.18. M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAI. DISTRICT REGUTATIONS
1. USES PERMITTED
C, Uses Permitted With A Special Use Permit.
0
The £ollowing are uses permitted with a Special Use Permit in M-2
Districts:
(1) Offices not associated with a principal use//.// provided that:
(a) The parking supply be in compliance with the requirements of
Section 205 18 5, of the Gity Code and be sufficient to support
full occupancy of the buildin� Parkin� requirements shall be
determined. bv the Citv, for each tenant prior to_occupancy.
S2) Commercial retail service uses and Class I restaurant'uses
within office and/or industrial buildin�s which are supplemental to;
and for the convenience of, the operation of the zonin� district :arid
which provide goods and services which are primarily for the use=of
persons employed in that district, provided that: •-;��-�
:;;> `
ja) The maximum Rross floor area occupied by all such uses �does
':;not exceed, 20 percent of the total gross floor area of the
building, with no individual tenant exceeding 3,000 square feet;
(b) The parking supply be in compliance with the requirements of
Section 205.18.5., of the City Code and be sufficient to support
full occupancy of the buildin�. Parking requirements shall be
determined by the City for each tenant prior to occupancy;
�"
Ordinance No.
Page Four
�c) Only wall mounted signs, subject to the limitations of
Section 214 of the City Code, shall be permitted.
(d) The buildin� owner and/or a�ent is responsible for infoz'minR
a�prospective tenant that the property is zoned for industrial
- use.
� Comraercial retail and service uses within office dndlor
industrial buildin�s, includinl� those with drive-throu�h componeti�s,
s_uch as banks, cleaners, vhoto shops, Class II restaurants;' �ind
similar uses, provided that: -��'-`
- � ,��
(a) The maximum �ross floor area occupied by such use and alI
other commercial uses, as permitted by special use permit, does
not exceed 30$ of the buildin�s total floor area with no such
individual tenant exceedin� 5,000 square feet;
(b) The parkin� supply be in compliance with the requirements of
Section 205.18.5. of the City Code and be sufficient to support
full occupancy of the buildin�;
(c) Only wall mounted siqns, subject to the limitations of
Section 214 of the City Code, be permitted;
(d) The proposed use shall only be permitted when it can be
demonstrated that their operation will not �enerate such level of
traffic so as to reduce "The Existing Level of Service", as
defined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, on streets at
intersections;
(e) The proposed use, in the opinion of the City Council, wouTd
be compatible with the area in which it is proposed to be
located;
_(f) All such uses only be considered on an individual, tenant
specific basis; and
(g) The buildin� owner and/or agent is responsible for informing
any�rospective tenant that the propertv is zoned for industrial
use.
S4) Commercial recreation uses subject to the conditions outlined in
3b - 3g above, except maximum gross floor area (percent of total and
individual) shall be considered on an individual case by case basis.
�. ;
, .�.:
;;��.
r
�
�
Ordinance No.
Page Five
PASSEA AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY T1iIS DAY OF
, 1987
. . " . . � . ;._-..F ,:'
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR : �
ATTEST : �m`��`a
�; e�..
r.:�-
,� �_.
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing:
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
.`:' �
: �,,� ,
, ' � .�,.._
� . ; �.s:
�,
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
CHARTER C011MISSIOP� t+IEETYNG, MAY 11, 1987
CALL TO ORDER.• .� .,.
-. .��
Chairperson Nendley called the May 11, 1987, Gharter Commission meeting td orderi
at 7:30 p.m. �L
,���.
ROLL CALL:
_____.�
P�embers Present: Margaret Hendley, Donald Setzold, Diane Savage, Dorothy Evenson,
Ed Hamernik, Geraldine Schei, 4Jalt Starwalt, Orville Carlson,
Bruce Nelson (arr. 8:30)
Merabers Absent: Ral ph Stouffer
Others Present: Bill Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager�
Mayor Bi l l tlee
Dennis Schneider, Councilperson
Ed Fitzpatrick, Councilperson
Brian Goodspeed, Councilperson
Nancy Jorgenson, Councilperson-at-large
Don Mittelstadt
Tim Breider
6ob Barnette
Dave Harris
APPROVAL OF APRIL 20, 1987, CHARTER C0�44ISSIOtJ MIP�UTES:
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. STARWALT� TO APPROVE THE APRIL 20� 1987,
CHARTER COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON HENDLEY DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
APPROVAL OF AGENOA:
' MOTION BY MS. SAVAGE, SECONDED BY MR. STARWALT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS
SUBMITTED.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON HENDLEY DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. t '`
1. COt�SIDERATION OF TEi�iS OF OFFICE OF MAYOR A��D COUNCILMEMBERS: �� ��'
�� -
Ms. Hendley stated the Commission was very privileged to have such distinguished
guests at the meeting.
Ms. Hendley stated the purpose of the meeting was to get input from current
councilmembers and past councilmembers based on the questions put together by
the Charter CoRmission at their March meeting.
�
�
6A
�HARTER COP1MISSIO�� MEETIt�G, MAY 11, 1987 PAGE 2
Councilperson Schneider stated he had put his thoughts down on paper, and he
� handed out: copies of his comments to the Comnission members. In trying to
answer the'questions asked by the Commission, he first had to figure out.how
he would and fiow he did deal with a change to the existing process. ihe ffirst
thing he did was look at what the objectives are of the process or syste�,�arid
what those objectives are trying to accomplish. Was the existing process�
working, or was it not working. �Ihat was it supposed to do? Who does t,i Y
serve? Once he knows the answers to those questions, he then starts�ta
look for specific factors for meeting or not meeting those objectives.
Councilperson Schneider stated when he knew the process was failing, he started
looking for alternatives--what modifications to the process or the system
needed to be put in place to correct it. There were a couple of implications.
One implication was if the process was meeting its stated objective, then he
personally was very conservative about making changes unless those changes
can be shown pretty conclusive at proving something. Where there are defici-
encies, he had to measure the risk of change--how bad was the deficiency versus
t'he overall objective. If it was meeting 95� of the overall objective and was
5p deficient, then he started looking at what could be chanqed that was limited
enough in scope without changing what was already working. _
Councilperson Schnei�der stated that regarding the off-year versus_on-year
elections, he felt this question could be answered from several viewpoints:
the elected official, the publio-at-large, city staff, etc. He felt that
traditionally, the on-year elections favored incumbents. It was harder for
an "unknown" candidate to make his/her name known in an off-year, yet within
Fridley, there were cases where unknowns have succeeded.
Councilperson Schneider stated from a candidate's point of view, especially
as an encumbent, the on-year election was better. More people know there is
an election; campaign workers can be shared with other races; the political
parties publish and distribute literature for endorsed candidates, etc. The
other side of it was that it was harder to get local issues discussed. The
focus was more on the questions at the state and national levels. For a
local official, that was a negative; however, there was more participation
and that was a"plus" from the viewpoint of democracy.
Councilperson Schneider stated that in previous �harter-Comriission minutes,
one of the rationales for considering the.on-year.versus the off-year was
the question of cost. He did not think cost had any place in the democratic
process, Elections cost money, and dictatorships are cheaper and more
efficient, but certainly that did not mean they should be moving towards that_
system. He did not think the amounts of money they would be talking about
would be significant enough to have it as an issue. ���.� �,'
' � . � a"'� — ;' `
Councilperson Schneider stated he liked the present system, and it mtght �e
the best of both worlds. They run botfi in an off-year and an on-year. 7he
issues are`more focused on local government in the off-year election which
was a"plus". The party influence was significantly reduced. During the
on-year election, the party had more influence. The campaign for local
office might be less local issue oriented, but great numbers of people get
involved and vote.
�`
�
' CHI�RTER COt1MISSION MEETIt�G, �MY 11 1987 PAGE 3'
Councilperson Schneider stated his bottom line was that he liked the present
- system and was unsure of what objective wasn't being met right now, with
perhaps the question of participation in off-years. He would not oppose�`
change to an all on-year election, provided no terms were shortened in the",
process.
Ms. Hendley stated the Charter Com�ission was looking at the possibility'�of
making the City run more efficiently, and whether the City Council members :
and former City Council members felt that the people of Fridley were beinq
properly represented. The Cormission was not out to change anything if the
current system was working fine now. The question had been raised that
possibly there could be better representation and the possibility that there
should be more Council members. These were things the Comnission had dis-
cussed and what the Commission wanted to know. Was the City runninq effici-
ently and satisfactorily now? If so, why? If not, why not?
Mayor i�ee stated he agreed with almost everything Councilperson Schneider
had said. He felt the three year term had a good quality to it. He liked
the idea that there was a ward representative, but he also liked the idea
that every citizen could get in contact with the majority of the Council--
a ward member, Councilperson-at-large, and the Mayor. Yet, the people have
the availability of a ward member to do the streetlight petitions, etc.,
that a ward member was in a good position to do. He did not have any parti-
cular desire to change the present system. He stated he did agree that it
would be easier for every candidate to run in an on-year election:
Mayor t�ee stated he felt that most people that were established citizens in
the City were quite aware of what was going on, whether it was an on-year or
off-year. They just have a problem of getting people to think sometimes
that it is worth turning out to vote in an off-year. However, he had found
out that when the issue is there, the people do turn out to vote.
Ms. Hendley stated one of the reasons the Commission was looking at the
possibility of going to a 4 year term was because alot of cities have changed
to the 4 year, on-year term. The Commission was curious to find out if the
present Council members and former Council members felt there was somethinq
lacking in the operation of the Councfl.
: :
Councilperson-at-Large Nancy Jorgenson stated that in looking over the system,
she felt it was apparently working well. A four year term would be wonderful,
because then a person would not have to run as often for the Councilperson-at-
large position. She stated Fridley was a very large city, but it was a city
that could be covered adequately. It took a lot of hard work to do Zt. ::.�„� `
As Councilperson Schneider had pointed out, the on-year did favor the encu�ents.
She felt a'3 year term should be the mini�um, because it does take a y��r�to
plan a campaign. If the term was shortened to a 2-year term, a person was '-
either going to be in the process of planning a campaign or actually doing the
campaigning,'and it was nice to have that extra year in there.
Councilperson Fitzpatrick stated that much of what he would say would be
re petitious because he was in substantial agreement �ith Mayor Nee and
Councilperson Schneider. He did think there was a problem (not a problem
W
CHARTER COt1t�11SSI0N MEETING, MAY 11, 1987 PAGE 4
so big it needed to be fixed completely), but it was true that a�ard eleo-
tion can range from 1,000 or fewer people to over 5,000 people. 'ihe on-
year elections have been as high as 5,000 or more, and the off-year elections
have been 1,OD0 or fewer. He felt there were implicit problems in th�;t,-#�ut
he did not want to empMasize it to the point where it would become ou� of''�:
focus in the Commission's considerations. �'�x a�� '
�4� �
t�lr. Don Hittelstadt stated he felt the wisdom of the original Charter s°'
Commission was excellent. The 3 year terms and the mix does serve the City
well. He felt the number of people interested in city government was about
6� or less--people Y+ho actually have some knowledge of what is going on in
the city as a resident and as a taxpayer. So, in the off-years, they are
going to get that number of people out to vote, and in the on-years, the
people will coree out to vote just on name recognition. But, he felt it all
averaged out in the long run. :-
Mr. Mittelstadt stated the only thing he might consider changing would be
one year longer in terms of a term of office, but then base it on the nurnber
of terms as an elected official, and then a person can no longer campaign or
run for office after that. Example: Two 4 year terms; campaign_in the mid-
session at the end of the fourth year, and then serve additional 4 years if
elected again; eight years of total service to the City.
Mr. Mittelstadt stated this change-over then brought in new blood and
new issues, and he thought that would be a major step forward.
Mr. Dave Harris stated he would like to see a continuation of the 3 year term,
but he thought the election for mayor and councilperson-at-large should be
city-wide elections, and then the three ward elections should be taken at the
same time. So, rather than having a 2-2-1, they would have a 3-2, and they
would not have that third election they have now which does not inv�lve the
whole city. If the three councilpersons were all campaigning at the same time,
they would be involving the whole city in the political process. Issues could
be raised at that tine that are city-wide issues. He felt the major decisions
- that are being made are city-wide decisions, although there are exceptions.
He felt the city should be put in the position of having someone run in each
of the wards in the same year. They have an election virtually every year
now, and the polling places have to be opened sometimes just for one office.
_ He felt they diminish the importance of that job, and it could still be the
same if it was handled at the sar�e time with the other ward councilpersons.
Mr. Betzold stated what Mr. Harris was suggesting was that mechanically;� ,
there would be an election--the mayor and councilperson-at-large in the`first
year, the three ward councilpersons in the second year, and no election,the_
third year. If it were switched to 4 year terms, they could still do essen-
ti al ly ttre same thi ng. Would Mr. Harris object to 4 year terms ��ersus 3�year
terms? -
Mr. Narris stated he did like the 3 year process, but the 4 year term would
work the same way. Whether it was 3 year or 4 year terms, he still felt the
3 ward councilpersons should be running together.
CHARTER COt1t�(ISSIOW t4EETI��G, MAY 11, 1987 PAGE 5
Councilperson Schneider stated that he liked the staggering.of the 3 year
terms. but maybe Mr. Harris' proposal would still have a fairly reasonable.
stagger. However, he supported the 3 year term. Ne did have some concern5.
with the majority of the council members being up for election at the s��
time. There could be a complete turn-over. Of course, there were two sid4es
to it. If it happened, it might be what the people want, but often therrE�,�
are emotional issues where the right answer is not necessarily the popuTat� y�
answer. From a longer range objective for what was good for the City, he
did not want to see the whole Council change.
Councilperson Fitzpatrick stated he was not locked into a 3 year term. The
3 year term has worked �rell, but he would like to see a 4 year term.
Councilperson Goodspeed stated he thought the 4 year term might �ive a person
more breathing space.
Mr. Harris stated that in defense of the 3 and 2, he did not think the
Charter Commission was was proposing to defend, promote, or deny a complete
change in the City Council. The decision should be made by the people, not
the Charter Commission, or any of them who were here to provide input to the
Corranission. Ii it did happen and there was a turn-over on the Council,
that was fine. It was the American way, and it happened all the tir►� ir�
the State Legislature. Two years ago the Republicans were in control of the
House; and this year they are not. That was a decision made by the voters,
and they should have the right to do that.
Ms. Hendley stated the Charter Commission was interested in settinq up the
Charter so that the City can operate to its best possible potential. If the
present way was the best way, t1�en that was the way it would stay.
rl■,
�'
Mr. Tin Breider stated he liked Mr. Harris' suggestion of the 3 and 2. He
did like tfie 3 year term. When a person makes a comnitment to serve on the
Council, he felt 3 hears was a long time. Four years was too long a corxnit-
ment, and two terms would mean 8 years instead of 6 years. Outside the present
Council members, he did not think there were very many people who had been on
the Council more than 6 years. He stated he liked the staggered terms from a
practical standpoint so there was no possibility of all new Council members.
People have different personalities and different ways of doing things, and
five new people could make things quite difficult for awhile until they got
used to each other. He liked the 2-2-1, because a councilperson only.has to
work with two new people at a tirt�e rather than 3 or 4. Regarding ��1r. Harris'
suggestion of the councilpersons running together, when there was only one�
S•�ard councilperson running and that was the only issue, it was hard to generate
any enthusiasm. � ,. �
.:. j
Mr. Betzold asked Mr. Breider if the possibility of all three councilpersons
turning over at one time would concern him.
t+lr. Breider stated there would still be two left, so there would still be
some continuity. He did not think that would be a real big problem.
�
CHARTER C0�1MISSI0��1 14EETI��G, MAY 11, 1987 PAGE 6
Mr. Betzold stated that with the 3 year terms, there was the possibility of
3 new councilpersons followed by two more within one year's time, so there.
was still the possibility of the whole City Council turning over. :;�,
<:� . , �
t+lr. Breider stated that would still give the Council a one-year transi�i+o�;
period. ;.�-.:�
-�� .
Councilperson Fitzpatrick stated Columbia Neights, for example, has 4 year
terms in the.off-year for councilmembers-at-large and two year terms for the
mayor which means three people run every two years. The purpose for that
was to allow for a turnover if there is a burning issue of some kind.
Mr. Barnette stated he saw the 3 year term as a good thing. It has worked
well in the past, but there was some value in all 3 ward counciTpersons
running together. Ne would not favor a 2 year term. He felt history has
proven in Fridley that they do not have mass turn-overs, even when there are
burninc� issues. He just did not think that would happen. So, he would like
to see the 3 councilpersons running together and then the mayor and council-
person-at-large running together. If�he was on the Council, 4 years would
be great, but he did not see anything wrong with staying with 3 year terms.
Councilperson Schneider asked what the Charter Cor.unission's rationale was for
suggesting 4 year terms.
Mr. Betzold stated he was the one who proposed the 4 year term. He was look-
ing at the 4 year term for a number of reasons, one of which was cost, and
he just wondered if there was any value to be gained by having the city elec-
tions at the same as the state and national elections every four years.
Mr. Harris stated he did not disagree with four years. He did think the
important thing was to get the whole city involved in an election at the
same time and that could be done with either the 3 year or the 4 year process.
Mr. Barnette stated the elections in Fridley have gone pretty well in the
past. He had no strong feelings either way regarding the on-year or off-
year elections.
Mr. Mittelstadt stated that the wards are split generally even by law--
around 10-12,000 people per ward councilperson. Like Mayor Nee had said,
there was really the ward councilperson, the mayor, and the councilperson-
at-large serving each ward, so regarding the issue of whether there should
be more council members, he felt the size of the City Council now was perfect.
: ��
Ms. Evenson stated the City Council has been at five members for a long�time,
even wiien the popul ati on was l ess . ��:��
Mayor Nee:stated that was right, but now they have a much better staff than
they did years ago. All of the problems they tried to resolve at that time
and the poor communication was often due to inadequate staff involvement.
The better the staff involvement, the less problems occur in terms of
constituent service. There are other kinds of problems the City Council has
� �
�
�
CHARTER COt1�4ISSI0N MEET�Wr,, MAY 11, 1981 PAGE 7
to deal with regarding financing, etc., that relate to the constituent
problens that have increased and become more complex. The constituent
problems did seem to be on the decline, though, mainly because Staff wasw:, �
���
doing a better job. �- � .
. . � . . � � . . � r� 6. u"t�� ,.� .
Mayor ��ee stated when he was first on the City Council, there was a o u1
P p �.
tion of about 18,000, and there were five members on the Council. He wouTd
guess he gets about 8-10 serious items a week from constituents, and for the
most part, those can be resolved between the constituent, Staff, and himself
without all the owrk that used to be done in the past. Some, of course,-
cannot, but in comparing now to 20-30 years ago, he did not think that was
necessarily relevant because the problems are much different. There might
still be a reason ta add 2 more Council members, and he would have no objec-
tion to that. It wasn't as though a ward councilperson was actually inter-
acting with 10,000 people, the councilperson was interacting with the few
things that go wrong, and when something goes wrong, something has to be done
to the extent the system works.
Ms. Hendley asked if anyone felt there should be more Councilmembers.
Mr. Mittelstadt stated he felt Mayor ��ee was right when he said Staff takes
so much pressure off the elected officials. He felt 5 members was adequate.
Councilperson Schneider stated whether it was one councilperson to 6,000;
one to 8,000, or one to 10,000, in his view the question was what was working,
and what size worked best? When there are real issues, there is usually a
concensus. There are examples where large legislative bodies do not work
very well, and the more difficult it is to form that concensus.
Mr. Narris stated he felt five people was a good n�nber. He stated he has
appeared before Council all over the metropolitan area, and it seemed the
larger the Council for a city the size of Fridley, the more politican the
Council gets. for some reason, they seem to take more sides more often when
there are more people to make a decision. Ne felt Fridley has done a good
job in representing itself by not being political. It was a real deterrent
to business and industry to have a City Council making political decisions
sometimes which are decisions based on attitudes of the people sitting in
the audience and not on what was best for the community.
Mr. Mittelstadt stated that in terms of growth, Fridley was bounded by
natural boundaries and there was no land left for building. He did not see
any major impact on the population size of Fridley. -:
,;: �� ;
Mr. Betzold stated one question that had come up in the Canmission discu5s�ons
regarding the councilperson-at-large position was: Was there any reason why
they should consider eliminating the councilperson-at-large and having 4� `
ward councilpersons and the mayor? -
Mayor Wee stated he thought there was a genious,in having the councilperson-
at-large pasition.
,
'
�
CH/1RTER COt1MISSION MEETI��G, MAY 11, 1987 PAGE $
Councilperson Schneider stated he felt the councilperson-at-large position
was very important. That.position provided back-up to the other council�°..�,
menbers and provided a city-wide perception. r��;-
�xf
Councilperson Fitzpatrick stated that as t4ayor Nee had said, every ind�`��.S�ual
in the City was represented by a majority of the Council at all times =th�K,-
ward councilperson, councilperson-at-large, and the mayor. He felt the �;= :,
councilperson-at-large was an important position.
Councilperson-at-Large Jorgenson stated she thought the position was working
well right now. If the constituents cannot reach one of the ward council-
persons or t�tayor Nee, they can sti11 call her.
Mr. Betzold stated that in some of the cities surveyed, they found that some
of the mayors had shorter terms. The Corr�nission has surmised that maybe
those cities give the mayors more authority, where in Fridley, the mayor was
equal with the other council members.
Councilperson Fitzpatrick stated he had cited the example of Columbia Heights
before. In Columbia Heights, two council members have 4 year terms; two
years later 2 council members have 4 year terms, and the mayor runs every
year, Therefore, there are 3 up for election every year.
Ms. Hendley asked each of the guests to give a final comment summarizing
f�is/her feelings regarding the structure of the Council.
Mr. Barnette stated he felt the city government was running very well the way
it was set up right now. He had served as councilperson-at-large for nine
years, and he felt the process worked well. Ne had never really heard any
conplaints about the process.
Mr. Harris stated it was important that the Charter Commission review the
ideas, thoughts,and suggestions brought up at this meeting. He stated the
Charter Commission was where changes will start, if changes are necessary.
If there was something the Charter Commission could do to improve the city,
then that was the function of the Commission. He stated he appreciated being
invited to this meeting to give his input.
Councilperson Goodspeed stated he would like to see a 4 year term; otherwise,
the process was working well and could be kept the way it was.
Mr. Breider stated he did not think anything had to be changed, except having
the three councilmembers run at the same time. ` i-�
°- � �..,.Y•
Mr. Mittelstadt stated that as he had stated before, the Charter has served
the city well. If they are at the point where some changes were to be made,
that was fine.- Changes were healthy and if the changes will benefit the city
as they see it for the future, he would propose that changes be made and changes
be made in terms of length of service on the Council. He would like to abolish
�
I .
�
CHARTER CO�IMISSIOt� MEETING, MAY 11, 1987 PAGE 9
the one ward in one year election. That was a poorly attended election.
They have to generate the whole city's interest. Giving people thoughts;;::
and motivation to come out and deal with issues was the way to keep the �-�'�r
people involved. � �"� `
� :.:.
Councilperson Schneider stated he had no objection to Mr. Harris' ide8 at�
putting the councilpersons together in.one election. It would be easier �
from a political viewpoint. He did not necessarily think it was true that
people do not participate when it was an off-year with only one person running.
Councilperson Schneider stated he felt Fridley was a good place to live.
He thought the government was working well. He felt the citizens were by and
large happy with the representatiot� and the government they have now. He was
not opposed to change, but there shou�d be some specific objective of what
it was the Charter Commission was trying to correct if they do propose any
changes. He did not want to see change just for the sake of change.
Councilperson Fitzpatrick stated that even though most of those present
recommended no change in the present process, he still felt it was healthy
to take a look at the suggestions made. It was healthy for the Charter
Commission to bring this to them; it was healthy for the Commission to invite
input from the councilmembers and fornier councilmembers, and it had been a
very worthwhile discussion.
Councilperson-at-large Jorgenson stated she was pleased with the 3 year term.
It was entirely up to the Charter Commission if they wanted to propose the
4 year term, but she definitely felt the 2 year term was not in the best
interest of the City.
�
Mayor fJee stated he agreed with Mr. Harris' sug�estion of the 3 and 2. He
had no apprehension about a total turn-over of councilme�ers. If that were
to happen, then Staff would run the city for awhile.
Ms. Hendley thanked all those who had attended the meeting. The Charter
Commission appreciated their valuable input.
Mr. Betzold stated most of those present at the meeting were saying the
process seemed to work well. �1r. Breider said he definitely did not want to
see more than the 3 year terms. Councilperson Schneider seemed to favor 3
year terms, but most of the others seemed to be open to 4 year terms.
Councilperson Goodspeed seemed definitely in favor of a 4 year term.
.�: ,,:�:
..� _�
Mr. Starwalt stated he felt from the input received at this meeting that��x�.
the City was well served by the 3 year terms and that no change was real.lyx
warranted. ` r; ;:y
Mr. Betzold stated it seemed ciear that everyone seemed to ]ike Lhe idea '
brought up by Mr. Harris that all 3 councilmembers run at the same time. °�
Ms. Evenson stated if the three councilpersons'ran at the same time, it -
would make the 4 year terms easier.
6H
,
�
,
CNARTER COt�MISSION MEETIP�G, MAY 11 , 1981 PAGE 10
�.
Ms. Hendley stated she had been concerned about a corr�lete turn-over of
council members, but it did not seem to be a big concern of those present _
at the meeting. .`, �
� �-� ����
Mr. Carlson stated that, as Mayor Nee had said, with a stronger staff now�,
a complete turn-over would not be that big of a problem as it was in the:���
early years when council members had more significance and more infiuence �
in the things they were involved in. It would �ust put more burden on the
staff to train new people coming on the Council. He did not think that would
be a big problem if there were three new people.
Ms. Hendley, Ms. Savage, and Mr. Hamernik stated they tbought the suggestion
of the three council members running together was a good suggestion.
Mr. Starv�a�t stated the present process has worked well, and he was not sure
this kind of change could be pointed out as an advantage for tbe overal] good
of the city sometime in the future.
Mr. Hamernik stated maybe they should look at it from the negative standpoint--
what would be wrong with having all three council members running. in the same
election?
Ms. Hendley stated she would like to see the Commission have a 4 year versus
3 year term debate. She appointed members to two cor.vnittees to debate this
issue at the October meeting. The committees are as follows:
4 year
Don Betzold - Chairperson
Dorothy Evenson
Orville Carlson
Bruce Nelson
3 year
Ed Hamernik - Chairperson
Diane Savage
Geraldine Shei
Walt Starwalt
Ms. Hendley stated that at the October meeting, they should basically limit
the discussion to the 4 year versus 3 year terms and the issue of whether or
not three council members should be running for election at the same time.
2. COt�SIDERATION OF "RIGHTS OF CITIZENS" PREAMBLE TO THE CHARTER:
Mr. Hunt stated that at the last.meeting, Staff was asked to get a copy of
the Preamble from the City of Oakdale's City Charter. As it turned out,
Oakdale was a statutory city and does not have a Charter. They have beett�"r.
unable to find any city that has a Preamble to its Charter.
. _�,��=.
Ms. Savage stated it appeared from past discussions that it was the concensus
of the other Comnissioners that there was no need for a statement of this
kind. She was not sure she felt the same way. It was her feeling there.
should be`some kind of statement of fairness of ideals of the City and fair-
ness to a11 citizens including minorities.
Mr. Nelson stated he felt that when this issue was first raised, most of the
Commissioners at that time hesitated to be the "guinea pig"--the first to
have such a statement. They felt it was an important issue, but felt some
:7Y
CHI�RTER COt1MISSION MEETIWG, MAY 11, 1987 PAGE 11
resistance because of the legalities, the fear of a lawsuit, and the fact
� that the Charter was a legal and working document in essence.
Ms. Savage stated she did not totally agree with those feelings because ���
� �.
there was more opportunity to sue the City now than there was when this`:'��
issue was discussed a few years ago. She felt sometimes people are too .�
worried about lawsuits. She was a lawyer, and she was not worried about,=':
la�rsuits.
Ms. Hendley stated that since t4s. Savage felt very strongly about this issue,
she would suggest that someone on the Commission work with Ms. Savage and
investigate the issue a little further.
Mr. Betzold stated that since the first item on the agenda seemed to be a
major issue at this time, he would suggest they table the consideration of
the "Rights of Citizens Prearr�le to the Charter" and take a look at it again
at a later date.
Ms. Savage stated she was agreeable to that suggestion.
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. NELSON� TO TABLE DISCUSSION ON TNE
"RI6HTS OF CITIZENS PREAMBLE TO TXE CHARTER" AT THIS TIME T1� BE BROUGHT UP
FOR DISCUSSION AGAIN AT A LATER DATE.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON HENDLEY DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. CO�JSIDERATION OF RECOMMEP�DATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THE CHARTER COMMISSIOP�:
Ms. Hendley stated Don Mittelstadt had expressed an interest in serving on
the Charter Commission beginning in September.
MOTION BY MS. EVENSON, SECONDED BY MR. STARWALT, TO PRESENT DON MITTELSTADT'S
NAME FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE JUDGE FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THE CHARTER C01�MISSION
FOR A 1991 TERM.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON HENDLEY DECLARED TXE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Hunt stated he would ask Mr. Mittelstadt to write a formal letter expressing
his desire to se rve on the Comnission. He stated �4r. Minton and Dr. Nbeison
had been appointed by the judge for terms ending in 1991. If Mr. Mittelstadt
was appointed, there would still be two vacancies on the Commission, both��or
1989 terms. :..�:,-
�= r -
I
I
CHARTER COt1MISSIOt�� MEETIt�G, �1AY 11, 1987 PAGE T2
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION BY MR..BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. HAMERNIK, TO ADJOURN TNS MEETING. UPQI� A
VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSQN HENDLEY DECLARED THE 1NAY ZZ� I987� .'� ,.;
CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:15 P.M. ��€Y
. t ��
x�,'
1 rY,��`
Res ectful y subm�tted, .
`
���
y eSaa
Recording Secretary
_�
�= ;�.
_ �;<�.
��.'��:
�.�
�
I
FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
���
= t�
-,��.
_ ,�,. ;
� .; -
DATE: October 6, 1987 =���-�� -
MEMO T0: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager 87-10-2
���
FROM: Robert D. Aldr�ch, Fire Chief .,.
RE: Hilltop Fire Protection Contract
The attached contract for providing of fire protection services to the
City of Hilltop has been approved and signed by their appropriate
officials.
I had previously discussed this contract with the Council, and the
Council had approved the concept. This new contract is a new approach
in that certain escalation features have been included. The standby
charge, a flat fee amount, is based on per capita costs. The City of
Hilltop pays 125� of the Fridley per capita fire protection costs.
1'he per call charge is adjusted each year in an amount equal to the
salary increases granted City of FridTey employees.
I am requesting final approval and ratification by tne Council and
signing of the agreement.
RDA/el
Attachment
,
. ; .�:.
z::� .�
7
,f
,
.
• r
0
FIRE SERVICE OONI�tF►CT
BE'tWF,Qi
CITY OF FRIDLEY ADD�
CIT'Y CF HII,LT� .
ANC[t� t)OITDfl'Y
�� � ����� . �
;-.�.
�.; ,-
• STATE �' MINI�.SO'PA
This agreeznent is made this first day of January 1988, by and between the City •
of Fridley, party of the first part, and the City of Hilltop, party of the
second part.
Whereas, the first party has fire fighting equiFment suitable for use in the
protection of property against loss of fire; and the second party has no
�', adequate fire fighting equipcnent of its awn, and desires to obtain the use o�
equipment of the first party, and services of its firefighters, (when possible
for first party to furnish the same), within the territorial limits of the
second party, namely the limits of the City of Hilltop, Anoka County�
Minnesota. �
Naw, in consideration of the promises, herein made, the mutual covena�ts
thereof, and in accordarice with the terms and conditions hereinafter
mentioned, the parties hereto agree as follaws:
1. That upon a request made by or fram the City of Hilltop, the first party,
will give and render assistance if fighting any fire therefn and will send
such equipment and men as are available, ready and able to be ser►t by the
first party. �
2. That the consideration to be paid by the secorx3 party and accepted by the
first garty for the furnishi.nq of such equipment and men to fight any fire
or fires, is as follows:
7A
i -
FIRE SEFtVICE QONIT�ICT
Page 2
0
a. A flat fee shall be paid by the.party by the second part to thr party
of the first part to satisfy the contr�t flat fee requirement. - Sa�B "
flat fee shall be 125$ of the per capita cost of the Frid�,ey Fft�
Department budget of the year completed. This f igure �hall lie.
multiplied times the population of 8illtop. Fapulat�on shall be°ba�gd
upon state deomgrapher figures on June 1 of each year.
b. During 1988 an additional sum for each call trip, of two hundred ten
and no/100 dollars ($210.00) will be paid by the party of the second
part to the party of the first part, and two hundred ten dollars
($210.00) per hour for each hour or fraction thereof for all time
beyond two hoursj said 'time to commence when the equipment and
manpower are back.in the station of the party of the first part. For
each successive year of this contract said fee shall increase in an
amount equal to the percent increase in pay granted�the employees of
the Fridley Fire Department.
c. The party of the first gart shall conduct inspections of industrial
anc] c�m�nercial properties and multiple dwellings in Ailltop and render
inspection reports to the City of Hilltop. The party of the secona
part shall pay the party of the first part three hundred seventy fiv@
dollars ($375.00) for each inspection. The gaxty of the second part
shall be responsible for enforcing fire prevention measures. Each
successive year this.fee shall increase in an amount equal to the
percent of increase in pay granted the employees of the Fridley Fire
� Degartment.
- ,
d. Payments of the fees under the ternis of the contract shall bQ due and
payable by the party of the second part to the party of the �irst p�,r�
as follaws:
(1) Annual flat fee shaZl be paid by the garty of the second par� to
the party of the first part, in two equal installments, payable
on January lst and July lst of the current contract year.
(2) Fire call fees shall be due and payable by the party of the
second part to the garty of the first part on the month following
the month in which the call occurred.
(3� T'he inspection £ee of $375.00 per inspection shall be due and
payable by the party of the first part upon receipt oF invoice.`-``.
.
FIRE SERVICE QOTTrRA+CT
Yd9e 3
3. 2'he operation of the equipment and the direction of its use at the scene
of the fire, together with its men, shall be in and under the compl�e�e
charge of the Fire Chief of the first party, (if he is present, otherqrtse
his next in cosrnnand or agent) . Z'he question of fact in each instanee �s
to whether or not the fire e�quipment and personnel of the party of the
first part are reacly and able to respond to a call in the City of Hilltop
shall be determined by the Fire Chief or his next in command or agent.
4.
5.
6.
�'he party of the first part shall act in good faith in sending its
equipment and men, to any such fire as herein pravided; and no liabil�ty
shall attach to the first party by reason of any negligent act or
cmrani.ss�.on of the driver or any men sent with said equipnent to said fire.
It is particularly unclerstoocl that the first party is not obligated to •
send said equipment and men upon call, if in jtx3gement of the Fire Chief
of the fixst party, or his next in cor�naiyd or agent, said equipment and
men are required at the time within the limits of the first party, t�
fight any fires then existing. Should road or weather cond�tions ba
unfavorable, in the judqement of the Fire Chief of the first party, as to
furnishing of said equipment ar� men at the time• then the first party is
not obligated to respond to said call; and should a fire start within the
corporate limits o£ the first party during the time such equipnen� and men
are traveling to said fire, or while they are actually engaged in fiqhtin�
said fire, or while they are star�ding by, said equip�nent and men may $�
recalled or sent back to.the City of the first party, proviAed in �he
judgement of the Fire Chief or his next in camnand or agent of the f i�s t
party, such action is necessary and advisable. _
T'his agrec�nent with any exhibits arXl riders attached hereto, contains the
entire agreement of the parties and no representations, inducements,
pramises of other agreements, oral or otherwise, not embodied herein,
shall be of�any force of effect.
This agreement shall be in effect upon execution and shall remain in
effect until December 31, 1992 unless one of the parties shall notify the
other party in writincj of it's intention to terminate this agreement.
Said notification of intent shall shall provide six (6) months
, notification prior to termination.
�ti,.: .
-:�;.,
7C
. _ _ __ _
/ . �
/ �
�
�
FIRE SEiNICE OONrRACT , . page 4
IN WITNESS WHIItEOF, the parties have caused this lease to be executed and -.
:�:
�.:t�
affixed their seals (if any) as of the day and year first above written. `°�
. � �,� � , - � �
CITY OF FRIDLEY ,
Witnesses to City of Fridley
' MAYOR (Seal)
CITY MAN�GIIt
CITX 0� HILLT�IP
Witnesses to City of Hilltop
, - • �.
�
�.: °�:
- -. �
.
CAI�C,%JLATIdN WI�HICSi3EER'
FIRE DEPA� BLIDGET 1987 $488.479
LESS 2$ RF�TE 78►499
BUDGET FOR CALiCUTATION 5409,980 � V
�
�'� �� �
� � ;�,;: �
� FRIDLEY PER CAPITA $409.980 divided by 29,570 = $13.78
.
HILLTOP PER CP,PITA $13.78 X 125$ _ $17.22
. STAI�IDBY FEE $17.22 X 870 = $14,981
THE AVEitAGE NUN'lBER C�' C��,S TO HILLTOP FOR THE YF�R.S 1984, 1985, 1986 WAS 9
9 X $210 = $1,890
2 INSPDCTIONS ARE OOI�IDiJCTED EACH YEAR @$375 $ 750
�TAL ESTIMATID FIRE PROTDGTION COS'I5 F�t 1987 $17 , 621
CIty of �Yidley
State of Mirresota
101 General Pla�d
,�i� ��• � �. �• �� •
��
!�
PFR9CXAL SFIi�iI�:
41102 FL�11 time - regular
41102 F1il1 tirae - regulRr, ot
41104 Tenporary - regular
41105 TeuQarary - regular� ot
41112 Dnplayees leave
41120 Medicare caitxibution
41121 PERA cantributian
41122 FICA cantributian
41123 Police pensian contribution
41124 Fire pension cantributian
41131 Health insurar�ce
41133 Life ins��arr,e
41140 th�enployment ca�e�nsation
41150 Worker's cat�nsatian
41170 Work order transfer
�rr�.
o��R II{PFI�IDITUt�S:
42200 Office svpplies
42210 Operatir�g supplies
42212 Ftiels end lubes
42217 Clo alla�rar�ce
42220 Repair � maint supplies
42229 Work order transfer ct�arges
42300 Professional services
42320 Conmmicatian
42330 TYaasportation
42340 Advertising '
42350 Printing �d binding
42360 Ir��ce � non-persaniel
42370 Conferc�ces aa�d school
42380 Utility services '
42400 Services contracted
42410 Rentals
42430 Miscella�
TQTAL , _ .
C�►PTTAI. QTII.AY:
45510 Iand � -
45520 Building
45530 Imprwrmts ot3�er than bldg
45540 Machinery
45560 Fluttit�e & fixtures
zvr�.
n�r srRVtc�:
46610 Interest e�erxiib�res
46620 Fiscal agent fees
1UI',Ai.
UINFR FTNAIICIl� l�SES:
47710 Resic�ua], equity transfers
• � 47720 O�ruti,.ng transfers
TL7TAt.
�/• � il Ml : D.,
BUDGET 1987
Detail - I.t� It�n De�il
F'i��
a��a � ar� � �c;� a. t:. r .�.�.a
��
► r;,�
�
140�399 149,345 I46,360 146�360 Z53�678 148�555
� 83 10�728 _, 15�OOQ
72,247 74�254 98,472 98�472 103.396..� �85.975
Y�
21�902 26�188 27.687 27,687 29.071 "'.= 28�1Q2
19�320 20�469 18�176 18.176 20�889 20,889
327 312 306 308 324 313
62�216 65�869 58�534 58�534 63,518 63�518
16�182 8�722 19.254 19�254 20,217 13,745
431 234 512 512 538 520
155
' 12,079 6�506 14�373 14�373 15�091 15�091
1�557 1,500 1�500
� �,b�+ �73 �'6 '� `�,2b-8
--�--- _ .
2,421 2,976 1,700 1.700 2�265 2�265
3�239 3,337 3�650 3�650 3�755 3�705
4,208 7�011 4�420 4�420 6,412 6�412
3�441 . 3�908 2�810 2�810 3�543 3,543
15�219 12.544 19�400 19�400 19�961 13�678
2�292 1�9U 2.011 2�011 2,069 2,029
1�247 2�402 2�402 2�471 1,349
3,484 2�431 3�577 3�577 3�680 3,b31
2�334 2,591 4�500 4,500 4,630 3�555
47
1,853 763 910 910 936 924
8,283 11.397 6,030 6,030 9�43T 9,437
5�902 6,075 4�000 4.000 5,089' S,089
25
12�494 16�580 ll,412 11.412 11�742 11�583
204 204 210 125
1,140 1�130 1�099 1�099 1�131 1�115
�S� � �. ?� �. ?� 77 �33� �+40
8�139 61,846 19,800 19,800 23,300 20�400
1�000 1,000 800 • 800
�i� � �� �� �.Ib� _' �'f6�
k
� . .'���;:�.'....
. �;
-� -� __._--a -� -a �-�
' 6�300 6,300 6,482 5,631
-� -a -b,� �,�i � '�"'�'�;b�3
419�599 489�472 478,901 478,901 526�863 488,479
79
OUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTH�RITY
COMMISSION MEMBERS: - LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHAIRMAN
OUANE PRME Y�iGNUI SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER
CITY OF FRIDLEY -
T0: Nasim Qur�shi, City Isanager PW87-335
F1�1M: Jock lmbertson. bcecutiv�e DireCtor - HRA
L1ATE : OctAber 13, 1987
5[,�JF'..C`P: Change Orders far Lake Fointe Corporate Center
,��-.
�..
f
s �
At the Housing and Redevelo�cr►ent Authority meeting of October 8, 1987,
they considered Change Order #5 � t1�e Dem�l�tio� & Site Grading Project
#163 by F�ebak Constructian for $22,635.50 and Change Order #Z t�o
Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1986 - 1& 2, Phase 2 by H& S
Asphalt for $2,460.00.
The change order to tY�e Enebak contract was necessary due to the additional
excavation of materials for th�e preparation of building sit�es in accordanoe
with ti�e Woodb.ridge plats.
The H& S Asphal.t Charige Order was a result of the mobilization and labor
costs associated with tl�e delay in the wnrk to this fall.
Since the Gity is managing the caritracts for the HItA, recamiend they
authorize the t-wr� change orders approv�d by the HRA.
JGF/Ji�/ts
Attac�unents
:.� .�
�r.-,
��
�.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON Q431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (612i 571-3450
, : FRIDLEY, MN b5432 EXT. 11T
_ ,: _ : .. ..
� _
8A
PIJBLIC WCRKS DE�RTNENT
Engir�eering Divisian -
QTY OF FRII�,EY �
__. Fridley, Minnesota
October 19, 1987
,- �� .
E�ebak Construction Cocnpariy '� �°�.� :
` P.O. Box 458 � `
Northf ield, NN 55057 �
,�
SU&TDCr: Change Order �5, D�nalition & Site Grading Project #I63
Gentlenen:
You are hereby orc3ered, authorized and instrucked to modify your vontract
for D�nolition & Site Grading Project No. 163 by adding the follawing:
B�ST�4�
�M �1pF�x. QU�rrY �1JT� �
On-Site Sand Mining 18,110 CY �st.) S 1.00 S 18,110.00
Cl ay Backf il l Pl acenent 18,110 CY � st .) S .2 S ��27�.5D.
�TAL t�iANGE Qt�t �5 . . . 8 22,637.50
CRIGIldAL Q7IJ'II2A�(,T PRI(� . . . . . . . . 5978,000,00
,; �TAL QiANGE OEtD�Ft # 1 . . . . . . . . . S 5, 000.00 �
TDTAt, Q�ANGE C�2DER #2 . . . . . . . . . S 12,000.00
ZU'i�AL �3ANGE C�tD�ER # 3 . . . . . . . . . S 167.113.00
�TAL Q�ANGE �2D�t #4 . . . . . • . . . S 38,750.00 :
ZUTAL C�iANGE OfftDF�t # 5 . . . . . . . . . S 2� 637.,�Q_
R�yISID � ANDUIVT 52,223,500.50
� �Caitted and recommended for approval by Gerald M. Sunde, Conseil.ting '
Engineer on the 19th day of O�tober, 1987. �= ���: ._
�r-:; -
Prepared by -
-` Gerald M. Stmde
Qiecked by
Jon T�cmpson
John G. Flora, P.E.
,
� Public Works Director
,
; :
,
E�ebak Constructio� C�mparry
Page 2
Change Order #5
D�nalition & Site Grading Project #163 rg
October 19, 1987 �': `
� ��.
�
� �� �
�°
Approved and accepted this � day of , 1987 by Enebak'
Construction Company.
IIJFBAK OONS'IItUCTION �.
� I�BIItT H. ENESAK� PRE5IDII�1'P
Appraved and aocepted this day of , 1987 by the City Council of
F'ridley. Mit'u�esota.
3/ 6/ 4120
WIId, IAM J. 1�E I�Y�R .
S�iIRLEY A. HAAA�ILA — CI�Y Q,FRK
,�,;.
�-
.: .��..
� ��.
,.:.�.<,�;
= �-:;;
.
. :
1
PUBLIC WERKS DE8�IRTNENT
Engineering Divisi�
QTY OF FRII�,EY
Frldley� MinResOta
October 19, 1987
H & S Asphalt, Inc.
1700 Industry Blvd.
Anoka, MV 553Q3 : �*
, ` � ,
Stl&7ECT: Change Order #2 - Street Imp�avenent Project °�
No. ST. 1986 - 1& 2, F�hase II '�- ~`
Gentlenen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract for
t Pz " ect ST 1986 - 1& 2 P'hase II b adding the f W.laaing •
Street Imprwenen o� . . Y
B�II�
� �
Ranobilization and increased operating oosts S 2,460.00
ZOT�1L C�iAiVGE CRD�2 �2. . . . . . . . . S 2,460.00
�.
QtIG TNAL aDN7R� PRICE. . . . . . . . . . . . S 368, 0 54.10
CEiANGE ORLIER N0. 1 . . . . . . , . . . • • . .S 17,250.00
CHANGE ORLIER N0. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S 2,460.00
REVISID 00[�i�T ANDUNP. . . . . . . . . . . .5387,764.10
51�trnitted and approved by John G. Flora, Rab2ic Works Director on the 19th day
of October, 1987.
Prepared by � �
Gerald M. Slmde, P.E. �
Checked b� `""'" �'' _ � „�
,V�
Thanpson. In ctor
.�
l�� ����i ,�
; � � ,. : -' Jahn G. Flara, P. E. -
�� �� Publ ic Wor ks Di rector _
_r�
� ----- -----------
-
� .
I
,
_
'
�
. _ . __. _ . � . _
�,
� � s ��t, �. gq
r;�� . . ,.. �� Z� . . . . .... . .. . . . . . � � - . :�. � � � . �� ..:. .
Change Order �2 - Project ST. 1986 - 1& 2, Phase II
� October 19, 1987
Apprwed and acoepted this day o� . 1987 by B& S Asphalt, Inc.
. ; .z: H & S ASPHALT, INC. �
. �����'�`K ,f+- �
, ' . . . . � . � . . . . ��J' �';: � .
.. � . ' ._� . . . . . , '�/V ' j ' �... i �
. .. � � � � �� r .
. . � . � � � � � . ' � ��
� . . � ... . � • ���� V� ���3� . ��£*� .
. . � . . . . . � . . . . � . . . .- � j{'° x .
Appraved and acoepted this day a� , 1987 by the City Council of
Fridley, Mitv�esota. - �
WII�LIAM J. 1�E + NF�YOR
giIl2LEY A. HAAPALA - CITY Q,FRIC
3/ 6✓4/ 6 :
�
��
I " ,., -
� �,_ . ,
� � ., ;: �
. �. �
�
.,.- �
t..; �._ , x,��, -,� ;:
f ��
, .��
, .
, _ .::
_ ., _ , t ..
;..
;,;;,
:.>
�! •
. _
'� .
� .
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: Nasim Qureshi, City rianager
FRO M: John G. F1ora,rPublic Works Director
DATE: October 13� 1987
SUBJECT: Bid Opening - Storm Sewer & Watermain Project �169
An187-332
On Wec�esday, October 7 at 11: 00 a. m. in Communi ty Room � 1 of the Civ ic
Center, bids were opened for the 5torm Sewer & Watermain Project #I69.
Ztaenty oontractors had been interested in the proj ect. Eleven bids were
received. �he lvw bid of 5309,978.00 was sutxaitted by Glendale Contracting,
Inc.
'Il�is contractar is an acceptable contractor for accompl ishing this large
watermain and storm sewer work.
Recommend the City Council receive the bids and award the contract to
Glendale Contracting, Inc. for 5309,978.00.
�e advertisement for the project advertised the work in four phases:
' 1. �at portion north of I-694.
2. Midwest Prir�t.ing portion.
3. El�iC por ti on .
4. Storm Water work for the Osborne Road development and Bacan
impravenent .
7he Navy has apprwed the a�sement for the FriC waterline and petitions have
been received fran all parties. Zherefore, it would be appropriate for the
entire project to be appraved and camgleted.
JGF/ts
Attachments
10
'
UTY OF
FRIDLEY
PROJECT 1 6 9 1OA
. �,_ • �—a--. '
-�-" — • � � /"� S�TY O�fRIOL�Y — e � '
�
. � �?��,':� 1 .,�..�' u •.�•� • VOTING -- $fiqOl
. �' r'.— ." " . dSTRICTS =.._ OISTRCTS �
A - � k � _ � � s . �!.3 �� w.. `� �t. ' ' �� � -� .
� "��....1 . __ i�� .�.- ."� „..� _.. " f—'— _' .
� l c� �T - -.'i �� � � , � . ~ r t _ ��-
� "" �� -- �= �w � � - _ ` i� � - _
� s � `� � 1 ;- � I, . _ . . — � .--
- `�-' -T '' _ � ° . '
P H �� jz r�.w' r''- � _ �. •
A S E 1 C ; �,�J.�'`'�; ' S�� ` R�•Nl�= S E W� E R � G--
I - �; ' „ . �. �- - � - r � ,,,,,�
. ._. �
. - ; Y � _.: � i , � •'E';
� • '� �� - ... _ _� � � . 11t � 1 13�� — — � - - '
\b�'/ _ � �f _ . ' '— l i i :� " ! ' `�, Y�.�.
G L E N C�i E E K b. - i' `r ;'-= E R,` ��-- _�� '��'.�
� �:
� �. _ .
� = �.. _� � = - � . °- _ �
STORM �, , .—, ` , -�,,_a.' .t,�
S � W - . _
. � _ ��.
ENR , ,, �-=�� � � ,.� :. �r, — � �
: . �� ,
�,
; � `_ � . - — 'i_ fr-
-�. . _J _ _
_ � _ _:,
P H A S E 1 w � � _ ,� E , + _ a . ,-�• ,; _ _ � �`�`
�:.��� : � �:� s �; i � � �' _ . _ _ _
, _ _ �.
. D . � k '% � ". 1 I = -- = T'f �D
� � -z'•.-+� � .- : �'- � - �-j ' -�� .
S � � � �'�f � ♦ L: • ! �
,
� '
j ► , � _ �°��� T � _ ,
��� } �,� ��+�__- � j
: - :. ,� -' �,_�i '' � � �;� i _ t �---�-_
_, ��
a � �� �.�.J� + .! r' r � � � �� ; � J �^ - ��- 44 ' � � ` ? �^ . .
/ I' -� � 4I��'',��a ��
m - n.+ �- �'� �- � i � !
E 'n ���� ���1� �``�X�.�, � �' j - �' �pa
� s.
tn .� _, •
i .-- � � �'�'���-��-- # 1 � � °'i .I �- _ .�_. �� {�
. .T\f� � ^ �� .,:�(C .. � I � - � i � - _
_._ __ - - i _ �
-_ � . I �7
'__ ,�.� — __ '_ � . t '! ^��- f . - . � �i.�_. � iTi i� k
i
� �.i 1
� �,I� s�. _ _` ! _ r.- _ ^T , � �� 1 M ~ �• 9.
"" - ° {1 ,1 �' ''1
- - -._ _ -
f ' ��; r-r ���, _ i� 6 1 y � i i�,� � � � � _
.�'� '`.--, '" '�_, r'"—
F �` � • !�, .,� _ ..<—_ . ., , _ ��� - --►
r _�E � = �I , 4�+' . — �_ 1� .
i .>;� � ° %1.-, __ ; ', _ � ' ; ����
�� � ;:1 + If �gU � F. _
�'�' �- � j ,� I -f - ", � �L �[ `����� -- �i .
��'`N., �� ��,/ _ • _ � -
� .
2 e4 • w. ... �,,��Ilr 1�. _��T� ii I'► =- �o��/j N• ;�Y�. :
.� �� � �^,�_ � �' ` '=' -.
2' �i, � ` �; � � �, ;i� � �,ff4�' `�' ;��
PH SE 1 /~ % �JL —�1;� i _ �- " '=��ar-�
�
) ; ,�_ �
/ � � � � � ' � - . _ �� �� �' i��� I
� . - �� -- - --- . - � „ � � � o.
st. �
' � �.r---� �, .. -- r,, 1\ S� 1. ' 41 // r: •T� i {
� --�_,��{- ��_ _ � I � �
� / � I �� � al �� : ��� _�. `lk-�__� �g - � � x„` j �,
; _, �/ _ � "_- � � , � [. ._1 �'_ \� ���_• _ _ ��_ `���'�� I
¢ :�%r �`--� � . °� �'�T�--�) ,.,.1�, i!i` _ ' j
I+��� J � , _ � , . . . � �' j i I�r'�; \ `�,I .
' ' = c�-�� - �. ` P�-� I�y�_-
�±� ! �� � � j '_ --�'
� .� — �_ ���_i'� _. . ; ,
� �, � � = ' ,__ -- __. ___ �-. �
�,� T fi R 14�,���' � N �_-- =
Z Q, r4'r�A�-A _ � �;11:�1 _ _ .-- -. __. .. ��� _
ii, �r �.
PHA E 2 ' __ � �Tl - _' � _= : �
N �`�t = �I_L � __ _ _ _ _
— .�w.—' N � �.. ' �S
� p :� _��� __ . , ��
� !�- _ —= -... .. _ ti _=_ _
i� 1
�� ^
1 �� % _~ •
B �` _ -- __-
K � i�5✓�- --� �- d �' K
. '� ' �. -; _ � = . - _
. � � _ ..: �, . .
{ i t . . -- .e.
} � �1 i � �} _ - .- -: : .. -'�• _
�if i _ _ _ -
(� �,� ; �l _ _.. . _.. _ �_. _ . _ _- �
„ r_' :
� _ jj'jI '�, — STREET MAP—CITY OF � ��__=� �
_x.—.�
:�= �� FRIDLEY �
Q � �.�_... ._._� - - = � - _ -..
_ - �_ -�_ _--� _ . .,... _.... ��`"':c�"�
. � — --- N — , �
BID OPENIlS 11:00 A.M. WIDNFSDAY, OCI�OBFR 7, 1987
SiORM SEZVFR & WFIPII2I�IN PRQ7�CT # 169
�+ I BID I ZUTAL I
PLANHCLDER I BQVD I BID I OONQ'�TI�
------�__��_�_�_�_� I _ I _�_----�----___Y��_
Gle�dale Contracting, Inc. I t I
3030 Harbor Lane I 5$ IS 309,978.001
Plymouth, NIV 55441 I I I
------------------------r. � .r�+._ �� _-- I_____-----------
Crossings, Inc. { I I
Box 10 I 5� (S 333,167.51)
Prior Lake, HN 55372 I I I
i—.___---_— I----__--_-1—_—__---------
Dave �r kins Contracting � i I I
15775 J�m iper Ridge Dr. I 5� tS 351,387.501
Anoka, NY�1 55303 • I I I
------------�_�_��� �...r_...___ �--- ---�- �---------------
Northdale Construction 1 i I
14450 Northdale Blvd. I 5$ IS 361,534.701
Rogers, NN 55374 I I I
-----------���----------- � ��r �_-- � -------- � ----- ---------
Hydro-Con, Inc. I I I
Box 129 I 5$ IS 364,575.001
North Branch, NN 55056 I I I
--------- -- --------� r�_�I --- � ------------
Bonine Excavating i I I
12636 Main Street I 5$ I S 365,839.75)
Rogers, NN 55374 I I I
_— ____�_� ����----- (------------ � -----------
Channel Construction Co., Inc. I I I
Route, Box 53 I 5$ IS 371,413.60f
Is1e, NN 56342 I I I
-----------.------------------ �------------ � ------ � -----------
Albrect Comg�nies I I I
1408 West CoLmty Road C I 5� IS 382,162.501
Ros�eville, NN 55113 I ! I
�---------_� I____�_�____ I_�__---------
B& D Underground, Inc.~� � I I I
6130 �set Drive I 5$ I S 383,965.001
Mound, r'Y�t 55364 I I I
--------------�------------- � ------ �----------- I --.----------
Lake Area Utility Contracting I i I
6995 - 20th Ave. I 5� I$ 407,770.001 �
Hugo, NN 55038 I I I
_---_---------------------- ��Y._�_--�----------- (--------------
Park Construction I I I
7900 Beech St. , N. E. I 5$ I S 416,426.701
Fridl�, MV 55432 I I I
----------------------- �-- _— I----__-----_ I----------.--_
� :
- 2 -
10C
-- { BI� ( TOTAL I
PLANEiC�,DER I BCND I BID ( OOI�N2.5
----- — -----------� I...rr__�� ��__�.__� � -----------
American Cast Iron Pipe Co. I I I
12112 Lynn Ave. , S. , Box 278 I I NO BID i
Savage, MV 55378 I I I
__------- ----------_—_I---_-------�— �.�_ �------------
Burl ington Northern Railway I ( I
4055 East River Road 1 I NO BID I
Fridley, NN 55421 I i i
---- ���_��_ ��v��--- � --.r�_____
H. B. H. Construction, Inc. i ( (
17545 - 6th St. , N. E. i i NO BID 1
P,rtoka, N�I 55304 l I !
--------------------.�._._.__ ���_...Y�. �----------- � ---------��
F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. I I I
14203 West 62nd St. I I NO BID I
Eden Prai rie, NR�I 55344 ( I (
-------------------------� --------� --��.��r.-------_--
S.J. Louis Construction, Inc. ! ( I
P.O. Box 1373 I I NO BID I
St. Qoud, 1�3 56302 I I (
----------���V._---___-- �----_----- �----- - �—_—_----------
M& M Se�aer & Water, Inc. I I I
3508 Belden Drive i I NO BID I
Minneapol is, MJ 55418 I I I
-----------------__��__ I����� �____--------- �----------------
North Star Waterworks Products I I I
6055 - 150th St., West I i I
Coi�ty Road # A2 I I NO BID I
Apple Valley, NN 55124 ( ( I
----------- ----- --_I _----�----------� -----------
0& P CAntracting I I I
10650 Highway 152, S�ite 133 I I NO BID I
Magle Grwe, rN 55369 ( I (
---___._-- ----------- ----� --------� ------- I__.______--_---�--
Water Products, �. I I I
15801 West 78th St. I I I
P.O. Box 1373 I I NO BID (
Eden Prai rie, NQJ 55344 I I I
--------_____.__._....�___---_ � ��__ �.1 �__._.------- � ------------
RESOLUTION N0. - 1987
RESOLt1TI0N AIITHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY AND ANOR9 COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC. TO
PRW IDE A SENIOR OIITREACH WORRER IN Tf� CITY OF FRIDLEY
WHEREAS, Federal Community Development Block Grant monies have been made
available to the City of Fridley; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 6, 1987, the Fridley City Council authorized
the expenditure of �6:915.00 of said Community Development Block Grant funds
to Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. for the purpose of providing a
Senior Outreach Worker in the City of Fridley; and
WHEREAS, Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. has submitted an
a�reement to the aforesaid effect;
N(7W, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
Authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the agreement between the
City of Fridley and Anoka County Community Action Program, Snc, to provide a
Senior Outreaeh Worker in the City of Fridley.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF
_, 1987.
WILLIAri J. PTEE - A4AYOR
ATTES T :
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
11
11A
ANOKA COt1NTY COMMUNiTY DEYEL.OPMEHT Bi..00K GRAN7 PROGRAM
AGREE MENT
Det wea�
� i t_r o f F r i� 1 e y � A POLtTICAL SUBDIVISION OF Tl-� STA7E OF MIM�lESOTA
�_ .-�7
Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc.
This ogreement, enfered into this l�t day of Septenber •
19�� between city of Fridley o po itico su ivision o t e tote of
M�nnesoto (heceinn ter re err to os the" ity", ond Anoka count � conmunitv ,
;��tior, Pro ra�, zn�. - hereino ter re erred fo as the
" gency" .
RECITALS
A. Anoko Covnty is on urbon county oppiicani for block grant funds under the Housing and
Communify Devefopment Act of 1974 (the Act), Pub. L. 93-383 as amended, and wil)
receive block grant funds for the p�rpose of carrying ou? eligible community
develo�ment and housing activities under the Act and under regutations promulgofed
by the Department ot Housing and Urbon Oeveloament (HUD) at 24 CFR p. 570;
B. An Urban County Consortium has been eslablished by a.loint Cooperation Agreement
between the County und municipol corporations within the County, the terms of which
specify allocation of block gront funds to those porticipating jurisdiciions for use in
occordance wifh the County Housing Assisfonce ond Community Development Plans
occepted by porticipoting jurisd;ctions and reviewed by HUD;
C. The City desires to have cerfain services performed by fhe Agency as described within
ihis agreement, and as authorized by City reso{utions for the purpose af imptementing
eligible ociivities under the Ac1 and HUD regvlafions;
�. li is oppropriate ond mvtually desirable thaf the Agency be designoted by the City to
underfoke ihe oforementioned eligib{e octivifies, so long as the requirements of fhe
Act, HUD P,egutations, sfate low ond local low ore odhered fo, os provided ior herein;
E. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide tor cooperation between the City ond the
Agency, as the parties in this ogreement, in implementing such eligibile activities in
the monner described above;
F. The Parties ore outhorized ond empowered to enter into lhis Agreement by fhe Laws
of the Sfofe of Minnesofa.
G, The alloched txhiblts ns listed betow are h��eby lncorporoted in this o9reement ond
mode a parl her�of:
Exhibit 1 - Funding Application
N. In considerotion of payments� covenants, and ogreemcnts hereinoiter mentioned, to be
modc ond performed by the porties hereto, the parties mutuolir covenonf ond ogree as
provid�d for in this ogreement.
C1TY
C,'/�� �
i9noiurt William J. Nee, Mayor
Name Type and Title
patC
Approved os to form:
ity ttorney
Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager
AGENCY
��-�--vl4 ''
gnature
„ ...
. . - .1
Executive Director
It�t
Dat e:
11B
PART L cEr�� cor��nor�s
i. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
The Agreement betwee� the porties sholi eonsist of the signature poge, the general
conditions; the federol, state ond loca) pro9ram requiremenfs; the evaluation and
record keeping requirements, �och ond every project exhibit incorporoted lnto the
Agr�cment; all matfers and lows incorporoted by refer�nce htrein; ond any written
amendmenis mode occotdin9 io 1ht generol conditions. Th�s Agre�ment svpers�des
a�y o�d all former og�eements appticable to projects attacfied as exhibits to this
Agr eement.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICFS
The Agency sfiall pertorm a�►d car�y out t� a satis�octory and proper monner the
a�rvices sef forth in the Exhibit(s) attoched hereto. In the case of muitiple projects,
�och project shati correspond to a separote exhibit. This Agreement may be arnended
frorn time to time, in occordance with the general conditions, for the purpose of
odding new projects, amending the scope of work, or for any other {awfu{ purpose.
3. COMMENC�MENT APD TERM�►�tAT10N OF PROJECTS
Upon release of project-related funds by HUD pursuant to federal regulations, the City
shall furnish the Agency with written notice to proceed. No�work on ihe ro ecf sho1)
occur riot to the natice to roceed withovt written a roval rorn the it .
ermination ates tor in ividual projects s all be specified in t e appropriate exfiibits.
Costs incurred af ter the terminaf ion date will not be reimbursed. The termination
date mQy be changed through amendment of this Agreement.
4. ADMtMS�RATION
A. The A enc shall a oint a liaison rson who shall be res oruible for overall
odministration of btock rant funded ro'ect s ond coordination with the ount
Housin an ommunit eve o ment Pro ram. The enc s a11 o so desi nate
one or more re resentotives w o s a out or�ze to s+ n i e mont ouc er
an e ortin orm, e names o t e ioison ersons an re resentafives s a
e speci ie in i e x i its.
B. For all egencies which are presently parties to Joint Cooperotion Agreements
with tfie County covering p{onning, distribution of funds, and program execution
under the Act, the Agency remains subject fo fhe provisions of such ogreement.
S. COtJ��Et�lSA1�ON At�lJ NI�THOD OF PAYMEM'
A. The Citr sho11 reimburse ihe Agency for the services specified in ihe Exhibits in
an amovnt not to exceed the amount specified on Exhibit A. Reimbursement
shall be bosed on a Community Development Voucher ond Reporting Form
submitted with supporting documents and signed by ihe Agenc�'s outhorized
representotive.
B. The Agency shot{ submit a properly execvted Voucher and Reporting Form no
fater than fifteen (IS) working days affer fhe close of eoch billing period. The
-3-
11C
Citr witt moke paym�nt to the Agency not more thon ten t10i working days aSter
11D
said invoice is received ond °hef in t e ev�et ihat tht vo hheCrequestjis i S� �
stotement of correcfion vouc
erroneous. Payment does not constitute absol�te approvol.
6. OPERAT1hIG BUDC�E7
The Agencr sho11 cpplr the funds �of the Exhibit�s� atto�hed heretoAg�eeme�t tn
occordonce with the r�quirements
7. FU1`1D1NG ALTERNATIVES AND FLJT'l�E SUPPORT
A. The Agency shall teport oll project income generatcd under ?his �►greement for
the pvrposes specified fierein or generafed throUgfi the project(s) funded under
this Agreement. Ali project income sfi�o�b��e°e�e ved by nd v dual proje ts
Co�nty wiit mointoin c record of prog
tor future use by the City for eligible CDBG ocfivities.
g. The City makes no commitment to fut ed for here n�except as expbe'sslr�setf �
future support of the nctivif�es eantrQCt .
forth in this Agreement.
C. Should anticipat�d sovrces of revenue'�k P o am° the�C'tr sh il mmediatelY
use in the Communitr Development B 9
notify !he Agency in writing ond thee �ent covered by feudnds �otr,ece vted by h�
liability for ihof portion of ihe Agre
C+ty.
8. AMEt�MENTS
Either party may request modificotions in thehsc �pQfefmut o11y ogr ed�upon s o'll be
o f t his Agree me n t. P r o p o s e d m o d i f� c a t� o n s w
incorporated by written amendment 10 this Agreement. A written amen dmen t may
af{ect o project or projects aufhorized by this Agreemenf or may be of general
opplicntion.
9. A551GNt�tJT At�D Sl1BCOt�tTR.ACTING
q. The Agency sha11 not assign ony phr('�°�feed t'hatso d consenttm� stt be soughi by
consent of the City, ond it �s furi e g
ihe Agency �of tess than fiffeen (IS) do s rior to fhe daSe of any proposed
ossignment.
g. Any work or services nssigned or subconfrocted hereunder shall be s�bject fo
each provision of this Agreemhnt a� S as fulty re�spor�,sib e 1oU1he City {or the acts
therein. The Agency agrees t at it
and omissions of its subcontroclors and of their employees ond ogents, as it is for
the octs and omissions of its own emptoyees and ogenfs.
_a-
1 p, NOLD NARMLE55 At�D 1T�AE MMFICATION
q, The Agen�y further ogrees that it is finon�icily r�sponsibte (lioblei for anr oudit
exception which occurs due to its �egtigence of foilure to comply with the terms
of ihe Agreement.
B. The Agency agrees to protecf ond swe the City, and the Camtr of Anoka, Stote
of Minnesofo, its el�cted ond appointed officiols, ogents, ond employees while
octin9 within the scope of their duties as aucfi, fiarmtess from ond ogoinst a11
ciaims, demnnds, and eouses of oction oi any kir�d or charQCter, Inciuding tt►e
cost of deiense thereof, arising in fovor of the Agency's employees or third
porties on occount ef personal inju�ies, death or damoge to property arising out
of services performed or omissions of services or in ony woy resutting from tht
octs oir omissions of the AgencY ondlor its ogents, �mployees, subcont�actors or
representatives under this Agreement.
11. 1h5Uf�NC� .
For ail ogencies which are not munfcipal corporotions orgonized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota, the folTowing insura�ce requirements shall apply:
A. Pubfic Liability Insuronce
The Agency sha11 obtain and mainfoin confinvously public linbility insurance
necessary to protect the pubSic on the subject premises io the extent oi
Five Hundred Thousand ( soo, o00 ) Dotlars General LiabilitY
Insuronce including bodily injury and property domoge with umbreilo excess
liobility of one Million tl,000,000) Dollars ond provide proof
of Worker's ompensotion nsuronce p�rsvont to t e tatvtes of the Statt of
Minnesota,
B. Building Risk lnsurance
The Agency sholt couse to be mainfained, during fhe period thot controct work is
in progress, All Risk 9uilder's Insurance, (including fire, vandotism, malicious
mischief and extended coveroges) in an ornount not less thon ihe vatue of
destructibie confroct work i� pioce.
C. Proof of Insurance
The Agency sholt provide certificates of insurance required under fhis section,
or, upon requesf of the City, duplicafes of ihe policies ns evidence of the
insurance protection afforded. 5uch iruurance policies shall not be reduced or
concelled without sixty (b0i days prior written notice to 1he City.
! 2. CO�ICT OF I�ITEREST
A. Interest of Officers Em {o ees or A ents -No employee, ogent, consulfont,
of icer, or e ecfed or appointed officio o the Agency who exercises any
functions or responsibilities with respeci to Biock Gront P�ogrom octivities
assisted under this Progrom or who ore in o position to porficipate in o decision
moking process or goin inside informotion with tegard 10 such octivities, mQy
-S-
11E
{3.
obtatn a personoi or �inoncial interest or btnefit frorn the octivitr, or hove on
interett in ony conlroct, subcontract or agreement with respecf thereto, or the
proce�ds thtr�vnder, elther tor themsetves or those with whom they havt lamily
or busincss ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafttr.
g. Interest of S�bcontroctor vnd Thetr EmpioZees - The Agency ogrees that it wili
ncorporate �nto every su ontract requirea To be in writinfl onQ mode pvrsuont
to fhis Agre�ment the foltowin9 provlsions: '
The Controctor covenants thot no person wf�o presently exercfses ony
funcf ions or responsibilities in cenn�ction with the Btock Gront Progrom,
hns ony personal finan�tal i�terest, direct or fndirecf, 1n this Controct.
The Controctor furth�r covenonts that he pres�ntly hos r�o interest and
sholl not acquire ony interest, direct or indirect, which wovld conf{ict in
any manner or degree with the performonce of his serv�ces hereunder. The
Controctor further covenonts that in the performonce of this Controct no
• person having arry conflicting interest sha11 be �mploytd. Any interest on
the part of the Controctor or his �mployees must be �sciosed to the
Agency ond ?he City.
TERMtNAT10N
A. This Agreement is subject to termination upon thirty (30) doys written notic� by
the City should: ,
(I) The Agency mismanage or make improper or untowful use of Agreement
funds;
(2) The Agency fail to comply with the terms ond conditions expressed herein
or the applicnble regutations and directives of the Federal Government,
S1ote, or County;
(3) The Agency fail to provide work or services expressed by ihis Agreement;
or
(4i The Agency fait to submit reports or submit incomplefe or inaccurafe
reports in any materiai respect.
B. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately upon the receipt
from the County of notice of the loss of federal funding for the Community
Development Block Grant Program or any project of the Agency.
C. This Agreement is subject to ferminafion vpon thirtr (30) days written notice by
ihe Agency shovld: .
(I) ThF City fail in its commifinent under this Agreement to provide funding
tor services rendered, ns herein provided; or
(2) Block Grant funds become no longer avoilable from the Federal
Government or through the County.
-6-
11F
D. Otherwise this A9reement sholt terminate on tht tot�st termfnation date
:pecitied on the Exhibit(s) attoch�d hereto and shall be subject to extension onty
br m�fuai ogreement and omendment in occordon�e with the General Conditioru
o� this Agreement.
E. Upon lerminotion of thls Ayr�emenT onr unexpe�nd�d balonce of Agreement funds
shall remain ln the County Block Gront tund.
F. in tix event thot termSnalion occurs under paragraph Ait) of this sectton, the
Agency sho11 return 10 the City a{I fvnds which were expended in vioSation of the
terms of ihis Agreement.
PART !l. F�EOERAL AND LOCAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
� I. GEI�ERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Compliance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amcnded
and the tmplementing regulafions at 24 CFR Pa�t 570.
2. PROCLlRENtENT STAPDARDS
in awording �ontrocts pursvant to this Agreemtnt, the Agency shal{ compty with a!!
applicabie requirements of locoi ond stott taw for owording controcts, including but
not timited to procedvres for competitive bidding, controctor•s bonds, ond rtta3ntd
percentages. In addition, the Agency shoti compty with the requirements of the U.S.
Office of Manogement ond Budget Circular A-110 retating fo bonding, insuronce and
procurement sfondords; and with Executive Order 11246 r ording nondiscriminotion
bid condifioru for projects over Ten Thousand ond no)100 i��`10,000.00) Dollars. Y►�`here
federal standards differ from local or state stondords, the stricter standards shall
apply. The federal stondard of 7en Thousond ond na/100 ($f 0,000.00) Dollars for
competitive bidding sholl apply only if the applicoble stote or iocal sfondord ior
compefitive bidding is less sfrict than Ten Thousond and no/100 �S10,�•00) Dollors.
3. ENVIR�NMENTAL REYIEW
A. National Environmenfa! Policy Act - The County refains environmental review
responsibiiity for purposes of fu{filling requirements ot the National
Environmenfa) Policy Acf as Smplemenfed by HUD Environmenia{ Review
Procedures (29 CFR pt. 58). The Citr may req�ire the Agency to furnish dato,
informotion and assistonce for the Cit�'s review ond assessment in delermining
whether an Environmentai Impoct Sfatement must be prepared.
B. Stafe Environrnental Policy Act - Agencies which ore branches of government
under M�innesofa Law refoin responsibility for fulfilling ihe requirements of the
$tate Law regor�ng environmenfol policy and conservation, ond regulafions ond
ordinances odopfed thereunder. tf the a9ency is not o branch of governmenf
unde� Minnesofa Law, the City may req�ire the ogency fo furnish dota,
tnfotmafion and assisfance as �ecessary fo enoble the City to comply with the
$tate Environmenfal Policy Act.
-7-
11G
11H
C. Saf isloctlon oi E�vironmentol Re irements - Project execution under this
flreement y elther t e ounty or t e ltr or the Agency sha11 not procred
until sotisfoclion o1 011 appiicuble r�qvirem�nts of the Notional ond State
Environmentat Policy Acts. A written notice to proc�ed wilt not bt lssued by the
City untii a{i such r�qvit�mtnts ore �ompiitd with.
a, r�or�o►tscR�MrNA�oN
A. c��
The Agency shatt compty with oli federat, state ond locoi lows prohibitin�
discrimination on the basis of oge, sex, morfto{ stotus, roce, er�cd, color,
national origin or the preses�ce of a�►y sensory, mento! oc physico� hondicap ot
any other basis now or hereafter prohibited by Low. Thes� requirements are
specif ied in Secf ion 109 of the Housing and Community Devetopment Act of
1974; Civil Rights Act of 1964. Tftle VI; Civii Rights Act of 1968, Title VIII;
Executive Order I I 063; Execuf ive Order I 1246; and Section 3 of the Hovsing and
Urban Devetopment Act of 196$. Specificatly, the Agency is prohibited frorn
loking on discriminaloty octions defintd in !he HUD Regulotions ot 24 CFR
570.602ib� (!-3) and sha11 iake such aifirmattve ar►d corsective octions os are
r�quired by the Regulations ot CFR 570.602(b}(4). These tequirements are
summarized in the tollowing pnrogropfix
,
g, prJ,oqram Benefit
Tht Agency sha11 not discriminate ogoinsl any t�sident of !he project servict
ore�a by denyic►g benefit from or porticipotion in ar�y block grant funded activity
on the basis of race, color, sex, or nafiocwl origin. (Civil Rights Act of t964,
Tifle VI; Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VII; Section 109, Housing ond Communitr
Development A�t of 1974). .
C. Fair Housing
The Agency shall iake necessary and oppropriate ocfions to prevent
discrimination i� federolly nssisfed housing and lending practices related to loans
insured or guaronteed by the federal goverc►rnenf. �Civil Rights Act of 1968�
Title VII; Executive Order I 1063)
D. Employment
1. {n a{I solicitations vnder this Agreement, the Agency sho{1 state fhat olt
q�nlified opplicants will be considered for employment. The words "equal
opportunity employer" in odvertisemenfs sholt constitute complionce with
this section.
2. The Agency sha11 not discriminafe ogainsf on employee or opplicdnt for
emptoyment in connection with this Agreer»ent becouse of oge, morifa)
slatus, roce, creed, color, notianal otigin, or the presence of ony sensory,
mentat or physica{ handicap, except when the�e is a bono fide occupational
limitation. Such oction shall include, bvt not be limifed to the following:
Emptoymenf, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruifinenf or recruitment
odvertising, layoff or fermination, rafes of pay or ofher forms of
��
compensation, o�d settction �or traintr►S. (Executive Ordcr 11246 as
om�nd��
3. To the qr�atest exfenf fea5idle, the Agency sha1l ptovide ttaining and
cmptoyment opportunities tor-lower incame r�sidents within the area
s�rved by block 9rcm1 assisted projects iSection 3, Housin9 ond Community
Development Act of 1968, os amended�.
E. Controctors and S�ppliers
1. No controcfor, subcontroctor, unfon or vendor e�ngaged in ony activity
under this Aq�reemenf shall discriminote tn the sale oi maferiats, equipment
or labor on the basis of oge, sex� mQrital status, roce, creed, coTor, national
origin, or the presence of any sensory, menfal, or physicul hondicap. Such
proctices include upgroding, dernotion, rrcruiting, tronsfer, taroff,
fermination, poyrate, ond odvertisement for employment. (Exe�utive
Order 11246 as amende�
2. All firms and organizotions described above shatl be required !o sudmif to
tht Agencr certificates of compliance demonstrating that they hove, in
foct, compiied with the foregoing provisioru; �rovi�ded, that certificates of
compliance shat! not be required from firms and organfzatioru on controcts
andJor yeor{y sa{es of less thon SI0,000.
3. To fhe greofesf extent feasible, the Agency sha11 purchase s�ppiies md
services for octivities under this ogreement trom vendors and contracfors
whose businesses are tocated in fhe area served by btock grant funded
octivities or owned in substantial part by project area residents. (Section
3, Housing and Community Deve[opment Act of l968, ns omended.)
F. t3of ice
1. The Aoency shalt include the.provisions of ihe oDpropriate subsections A
B, C, D, ond E ot this secfion in every conlroct or purchase order �or goa
on services under t� reement and shall send to eoc o or union or
representotive o wor ers wif w ich ii tws o collecfive bargaining
ogreement or other controct or understanding o notice odvising the said
labor union or worker'c rPnresenfafive oi the commitments mode in these
subsections. .
2. In odvertising for employees, goods or services for octivities under this
Agreement, the ogency shatl utitize minority publications in addifion to
publicofions of general circuiation.
5. LABOR STAPDARDS
The Agency sha11 requite fhat project consiruction confrocfors and subcontrocfors pay
lheir loborers and mechonics at wage rafes in occorcionce with the Dovis 8ocon Act,
as omended (40 USC sections 327-333); rovided that this section sholl not apply to
�efiobilitation of residentiaf property designed or residenf ial use by fewer fhan eight
fomilies.
-9-
111
A copy ot the current Dwts-$ocon woQe rote,m�� 52;�fl �� Doi{o'rs��truction bid
:p�cs and conirocts cver Two Thousor►d ond no
6, PROF'ERTY MANACEMENT
q, The AgencY o9rtes lhat vny nonexpendabie personoi property, p�rchased wholly
or in part with ogr�ement funds at o cost of Three Hundred cnd no/l00 �5300.00)
Dotlars or more per item, is upon its pvrchase or receipt ihe psoperty oi the
Covnty ond/or iederal governme�t. Fir►a1 ownership ond disposition of sueh
prope�ty sho11 be determined �nder the provisions of Appendix N to the U.S.
Ofiice o� Monogement ond Budget Circutor No. A-I 10.
g. The Agencr shall be resporuible for all such property, inciuding its care ond
ma i nt enonce.
C. The Agency sfiali odmit the Cit�'s property manogement officer to the Agency's
premises for the purpose ot marking sucfi properiy, as oppropriofe, with property
f ogs.
p. The qqency sfiall m�et the fo{towing prxcd�ral requirements for all such
propertY:
1. Property �ecords shall be mainfoined occurately ond pro�ide for: a
description of the property; monufocturer•s serioT �number or other
identification number; ocquisition dote ond cost; soUrc� of the propertp;
percentoge of block gsont tunds used in ttK purchase of property; and
location, use, and condition of the property.
2. A phrsicol inventory of property shall be faken ond the resutts reconcited
with the property records ot tenst once every two t2) years to verify the
existence, current vfitizofion, ond continved need for the property.
3, A control system shafl be in effect to insure odequote so�eguards to
prevent loss, damoge, or theft to ihe property. Any loss, damoge, or theft
of the property shall be investigoled ond fully documented.
4. Adequole mointenonce procedures shal{ be impfemented to keep the
property in good condition.
7. ACQUISITION APD RELOCATION
A. Any ocquisition of reat property for ony octivity assisted under ihis Agreement
which occurs on or ofler the date of the County of Anoka's submission oi its
Block Gront application to HUD shalt compiy with Title 1!1 of the Federal
Uniform Relocation Assisfance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Acf of
1970 (hereinaifer referred to as the Uniform Act) �40 USC section �601) ond fh�
ReguSations ot 24 CFR pt. 42. .
8. Any dispiocement o� persons, business, nonprofit organizations or forms occuring
on or after the date of fhe County of Anoka's submission of its 81ock Gront
application os the result of ocquisition o� real property assisted under this
Agreemenf sfial) comply with Title 11 of the Uniform Act and the Reguiotions at
-10-
11J
24 CFR pt. 42, as weil as with the Camty ot Anoka r�locotion poticy� ottocfird —
cs Exhibit B. The Aqcncy sfiafl comply with the Requtotions pertoining to costs
of r�locotion md written polici�s, as sp�cified by 24 CFR s�ction 570.606 (a) d
(b).
8. H15TORIC PRESERYATION -
The Agency sho11 m�et the hisforic preservation requircments of Pubtic Law 89-b65
ond the Archeoto9ical ond Nistoric Preservolion Act of {974 (Pub. L. 93 291) ond
Ex�cutiv� Order I 1593� including th� proc�dures prescribcd by the Advisory Council on
Hisforic Preservafion in the Reg�iafions ot 36 CFR pf.800. Activities affccfing
property listed in or found to be eligible tor inclusion in th� Nafional Register of
Historic P{oces wi{1 be subj�ct to reqvirements set fotth in HUD Environmentol
Review Proc�dures at 24 CFR pt. 58. •
9. ARCHITECTt1RAL BARRIERS
Any focility consfructed pur'suont to this Aqreement sfiol! comply wifh desiqn
requirem�nts of the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 11SC secfion �I51).
10. NON'ARTICIPATION IN POLITICAL ACTtVIT1E5
The Ag�ncy sholl complr with the provisions of the Hafch Act (S USC Chopter IS).
.,
1 f. NATiONAL FtOOD itsSURANCE
The Agency may nof receive Commvnity Development Block Gront funding tor
ocquisition or consiruction for use in ony area thot has deen identified cu hwing
speciot flood hazards and is not participating in the National Flood tnsuronce Progrom,
ns provided by Section 3(a) of the Flood Disnster Protection Act oi 1973 (Pub. L. 93-
234) and the Regulations there�nder (24 CFR Ch. X, subchop. 8). The Agency shall
comply with the Regulations at 24 CFR secf ion 570.605.
12. AtR AND WATER POLLUTION
The Agency sholl comply with the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42
USC section 1857 e �se g.) ond the Federat Water Pollution Controt Act, as amended
(33 t1SC sectioru �T et se�) ond the requiations issued thereunder (40 CFR pt. 15).
13. LEAD�ASED PAINT POISOMNG
The Agency shoil comply with fhe HUD Leod-Based Paint Reguiations (24 CFR pt. 35i
issued pursuont fo the Leod-$ased Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 USC sections
4831 et seg) requiring prohibition of the use of teod-bflsed paint (whenever funds under
this �reement ore used directty er indirectly for consiruction, rehabiiitation, or
modernizotion of residential structvresi; el+mination of immediate leod-based paint
hozards in residential structures; ond notification of the hazards of teod-bosed paint
poisoning fo purchosers ond tenonts of residentiol structures consfructed prior fo 1950.
-1{-
11K
i a. r�or�suasnntTioN FoR �oc� ��tr� 11 L
The Block Gront Fundin9 mode ovoilobte under this Agr��ment sfiaf{ not be utilized by
the Agency to r�d�c� substantiolly the amount ot locat finoncia) svpport for
community devetopment octivifies below the levet of such support prior to the
ovoita5ilitr of funds under this A9reemecii.
� S. PUBLIC OVYT�ERSMP
For Agencia which are r�ot municip4l corporotions orflonS2rd vndeT tha {aws of the
State of Minnesoto, it moy decome necessary to gront ihe City a prop�rty intcrest
wh�ere fhe s�bject project colis for the ocquisition, construction, reconstruction,
rehabititation, or installation of publicly-owned focilities and improvements. The
qgency sha11 comply with c�rrent Citr policy regarding fransfer of o property inferest
suf Sicient to meet the public ownersfiip requirement.
16. PUf3L�C 1h�FURMATION
A. In all news releoses ond other public notices related to projects funded under this
Agreement� the Agency sha11 inclvde information identifying the source of funds
as the Anoka Co�mty Community Devetopment Block Grant Progrom.
g, For oll construction projects the Agency sha11 ere�cf o sign to City specifications
at the construction site, identifying the sovrce of funds, except fhat this
requirement may be woived for construction projects of Ten Thousand and
no/100 �510,000.00) Doi{ars or less.
PART I11. EVALUATION At�D RECORD KEEPING
�, EVALUATION
The Agency ogrees to porf icipate with the Co�nty of Anoko in any evaluaf ion pro}ect
or performonce report, as designed by the City and the Co�nty or the oppropriate
Federal ogency, and to make avoilable oll informotion required by ony such evaluation
process.
2. Al1D1T5 AM It�SPECT10N5
A. The Agency sha11 obtoin an independent oudif on an annuat basis. Such oudit
shatl be made by qvolified individuals who are sufficiently independenf of those
wfio authorize fhe expenditure of Federal funds. 7he audif reporf sholl sfate
that fhe audif wus performed in occordance with ihe generally occepted
governmental oudit stondards for tinonciat ond complionce audits of the U.S.
General Accounting Office Sfandords for Audit of Governmental Or anizations
Pro rams Activities ond Functions, o t e provisions o MB - 0•
B. The records and documents with respect to a1I motters covered by this controct
shall be subject af atl fimes to inspection, review or audit by the City� County,
Federal or Stote officiols so aufhorized by low d�ring the periormance of this
controct ond during the period of tetention specified in this Part 111.
-12-
s. � � co►�ns
As reqvircd br }iVD Rc�utativns, 2� CF'R pt. STO, the A9encr sho11 compile cnd
maintain tfx �oliowin� rccordfi
A. f inoncSal Monogcm�nt - Svch records shoil identifr adequatetr the soUrce on�
oppiicotion ot t�x�ds io� oclivities wilfiin 1hSs Aflreemtnt, ln occordance with the
provtstons of Appendix G to the V.S. 4ttice ot Monoqement end Budfle! Circutor
A-t02. TRese records:ha{1 eontain intofmotio� pertainin9 to 9ront ewords ond
outtwrtzations, obti9ations, unobli9oted botonces, assets, {iobilifies, outlays, ond
income.
B. Citizen Pnrf icipof ion - tJarrafive and other documentation describtn� the proceu
used to intorm cifiz�ns concernin9 the amount of funds weilable, the ranges ot
project octivif ies unde�faken, ond opportunities to participote in funded biock
9ront projecfs.
C. Retocof io� - indicaf ion'of the overait status of the reTocotion worklood 6nd a
separate relocotion re�cord for eoch p�rsor►, busi�eu, orQonfzation, and farm
op�retion dspioccd or in the reiocafion worklood.
D. Prop�rty Acqufsition - Agency fites must eonfaSn (� invitatfo� to owna to
occompanr opproiser dvring lnspectio�, ibi et least one prop�rtr appraisai, (�)
stotement o� basis for determinotion of just tompensation, (� written offer oi
just compe;uotion, (�) ali documents involving conveya�ce, (fi setttement cost
�epofting statern�nt, and (g) nolice to surrender possession of pr�miscs.
E. Equat Opportur►ity - Tt►e Agency sfia11 mointoin rocial� tfhnic, ond gender aoto
showing the extent to which these categories of pers�ru have porficipot�d in, or
be�efitted irom, the octivit+es carried out under this Aqreernent. The Agencr
sho11 olso mointain data which reco;ds its affirmative oction in equel opportunitr
ernploymenf, ond its good-faith efforts to identifr, train, nndJor hire tower-
income residents of the project orea nnd to utilize b�siness concerns wfiich or�
locoted in or owned in subsf�ntiol part by persons residing in the orea of fhe
project.
F. Lobor 5ta�dords - Records sho11 de mointained regording complio�ce of all
conlrocfors pe: forming construction work under this Agreernent with the labor
slondards mode a�plicable by 24 CFR 5�0.603.
G. Such other records Qs moy be required by the County ond/or HUD.
4. RF TE t�ij i ON OF R� CORDS
Required records sho11 be relained for o period of three (3) yeors after terminotion of
this �lgreement� except ns follows: (I) Records that are tfie subject of oudit findings
sho{t de refoined �or three (3) yeors ofter such iindings hove deen resotved.
(2) Records tor noner.pendable propertr shal{ be retoined for thret (3) yeors after its
finat disposition. Nonexpendoble propertr is defined in Appe�x N toU.S. Offic� of
Mongeme�t and Budget Circular No. A-I 10.
5. F2EPORTS
The AgencY shotl submit such reports ns eq�ired by the City on a monthty ond onnual
bosis and olso ptior fo project execulidn�� "
11M
11N
ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC.
8008 N.E. HIGHWAY 65 • SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 • PHONE 784-2443
April 21, 1987
Mr. William C. Hunt, Staff Person
Fridley Human Resources Commission
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Mr. Hunt:
The Anoka County Community Action Program is pleased to submit a proposal
for the continuance of the Senior Outreach position in the City of Anoka.
The Senior Outreach worker has found many seniors who have great needs
which reinforces our concern thaC she continue to work in that capacity.
We at ACCAP are impressed with the Senior Outreach work that Darlene
Zurawski is doing. She is dedicated, knowledgeable and competent in
seeking out low-income, frail, isolated and lonely elderly.
We are also impressed with her desire to continue to grow in her abilities
as exemplified by her continuing education work. She has demonstrated the
ability to pursue new methods of reaching the elderly.
Please advise me if further information would be helpful in your review
of this grant request. We would be open to meeting with you or the City
Council if this would be appropriate.
SK/lm
Sincerely,
��--- �� �
S phen M. Klein
Director of Planning and
Community Programming
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
110
ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC.
8008 N.E. HIGHWAY 65 • SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 • PHONE 784-2443
A. Name af Orc�niz ation
B. mntact Person
C. Date AOCAP Fb�nded
p,noka (bunty Oanm�ity Action Program
8008 NE Hic�aaay 65
S�xing Lake i'ark, NN 55432
784-2443
5teFhen M. IQein
8008 NE Hic�way 65
S�ring Lake Park, M�T 55432
784-2443
1965
D. (See material pceviously sutmitted).
E. �he goal/otrj ective of AIX�P is to prwide motivation and
opportimities needed by law-ina�me, isolated residents of Anoka
��ty to be�ome and/or renain self-suffici.ent. �e goal of the
Senior Outreacfi Program is to serve as an informational, referral
and follaw--up resouroe to senior citizens so they may renain
independent. (See attachment A- AOQ�P Mission Stateaent).
F. Amo�t Requested $6,915.00
G. Proposed Se=vices
The Senior Outreaci� Worker will oontinue to seek out the f rail,
law-ina�me, lonely, and isolated seniors to learn of their needs
and to help then receive the servic�es that can meet those needs.
Zt�ese eervives may include fuel assistanoe, chore servi�e, home
delivered meals, senior oenters, transportation, weatherization
and the like. After a referral is made she will make a follaw-up
call to be certain that the servic�es have been reoeived. Zhe
Senior Outreacii Worker is able to make r�errals and iriform the
senior of the programs and servives availat�].e because af the vast
networking she cbes with seLVioe and program agencies.
Some of the agencies are hosp�tals, Social Serviaes, PuL11ic
Health Nursing, RSVP, and senior oenters. �e Senior Outreacfi
progr�n vanplenents other servioes which look to the Senior
Outreacii Worker for supQort and o�ntact.
In the past year, from Septenber 1986 throuc� lKarc�i 1987, the
Senior Outreach Worker aontacted 559 seniors in Fric��. She
macle 1,166 referrals. As of Marcii 1, 1987, �e has visited a
total of 964 households. Because af the nature of the neec�s of
the el.c7erly, and the time a�ns�ning referrat and follaw--up work,
AN EQUAL OP►OfiTUNITY EMP�OYER
11P
it is often difficult to make a great nunber of aontacts. �his
is espedatly apFerent when fuel apPl.ications are taken. With
the oonstant cut backs in f�ding the servioe organizations
receive, they are bea�ming more dependent upon the Sentor
Outreach Worker for ref er rals. AC�,P cbes not have the f inand al
resourves to pra�vide this servioe to the City a�f Fridley unless
this prop�sal is f�mc3ed.
A. Fach year the Senior Outreaci� Worker finde more elderly who have
rrbre than one problen. It is the nature af aging that as the
individual graws older health, financial and emotional prok�lens
a�ear more often. Irbst seniors have not had to use servioes in
their lives and they may be a�r�used and anxious when they need
assistanoe. Zt�e Senior Outreach Worker is at�le to guide then
throuc� the process to receive the neoessary servioes. In d�ing
so the elderly may remain inc3ependent and reasonably well.
I. it is estimated that there are 3,500 - 4,000 seniors living in
Fric�ey. Eacii year the Senior Outreadl Worker finds more elderly
to visit and in the 198?-1988 program year, 500 �eniors will be
a�ntacted to inform then of servives availat�l.e, to make
applications and referrals for assistanae, and to d� a follaw-up
to make certain servioes are reoeived. All of the seniors served
will be FricIley residents.
J. �e Senior Outread� Worker, a long time resident af FricIl�, has
worked sucoessEully in that position for the past three (3)
years. She is an expert in seeking out the elderly, using
secvioes available for seniors and making oertain that the
seniors needs are met and the servic�es are effective. Because of
the networking she cbes with other agencies and servioes, �e has
developed much experkise and lalaaledge to use in r�errals.
It is anticipated that the Senior Outreach Worker will be
involved with a ne�w program the Fric�Ey Senior Center plans to
develop. eeErienders will be trained to work in a hlock progr�n
developed in Fridley throuc� the FricIl� Fbliae. Each b7.ock will
have a Captain who will notify the assic�ed BeEriender of seniors
living within hisjher block. After the Bef rienc3ers have visited
the seniors, they will ratify the Senior Outreacfi Worker who will
make a visi.t to determine needs and make referrals. In this way,
they will make a�ntact with a large number of seniors who cbn't
have neecls, and the Seti.or Outread� Worker can oonoentrate on
those who need her help and euperkiae.
AOC�P bel ieves a true Outreacfi Worker has to seek out the
elc3erly. It is a fact that uast seniors with pcohl,ens will not
seek out the Outreach Worker �l.ess she is well I�own to then.
She is able to build this rapport by faoe-to--faoe a�ntact. She
fincts seniors by laiocking on cbors, reoeiving reEerrals frcm
cfiurct�es, the senior oenters, social servioes, hosp�tals, SACA,
etc. �ese agencies lmaa her and she will o�ntinue to make those
wntacts in the future.
�e two staff supervisors will be SteFfi� IQein, Planning
Director, and Flaine Vangerud, Proj ect Di rector. Zt�ei r resunes
are included with this grant request.
R. A budget for the fisaal year, Septanber 1, 1987 to May 31, 1988,
is included.
I,.
�e finandal statement for last year, Septenber 1, 1986 to 1Kay
31, 1987 is:
Fersonnel ( including f ringe benef its)
ZYavel
Subtotal
Ac�►inistrative Expense
�:i��
$5,718.00
500.00
6,218.00
622.00
$6,840.00
The fi.mding has been reoeived f ran the Fric'�ey QBG f�ds.
(See part IV.F(A).
l. �e majority of the people served by the Senior Outreach
Worker will be laa-ina�me, frail, lonely and is�lated
seniors who need the support of available programs.
2. Zhe f�mding will be used for the salaty af the Outreach
Worker, related travel and staff supecvision.
3. �e Fric� � Outreach Progran did not operate prior to the
origi.nal ¢BG allocation f ran the City. Zhe Senior Outreadl
Worker anti cipates that she will increase her seLV ices next
year in three ways:
A. By seeking out 500 seniors, meeting with then
individually, and throu� groups and orcpnizations.
B. By working with the newly trained Bef rienders (see J)
to use her experti�e when seniors are foind to need
her.
C. By working with seniors who may mave into the new
apartment buildings whic� are being Qlanned for the
City of FricIlEy.
4. AOC�P is a legal non-profit 501(C) (3) Corporation. (See
materi al s pr ev iously sutmitted) .
11Q
11R
P�[ ������ c���J�1 d� C����i`��.Jf���� ��. d��;%I�!
������i'� ��i'�T�i����'
The Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. (ACCAP) is a non-profit corporation with the ex-
pressed purpose of being a catalyst to create the skills, knowledge, motivation and opportunities need-
ed by poor and low income people of Anoka County to become self-sufficient.
ACCAP will work with low income persons and act as an advocate for them to ensure that concerns of
the poor community are adequately addressed. Our Agency will work to provide expanded employ-
ment in both the public and private sector, educational opportunities, direct s�rvices, and assistance in
organizing and coalition building among the poor. A1f activities wi{{ be provided with primary focus that
low income persons may be better able to achieve economic independence.
All ACCAP plans and programs wilf be developed and evaluated "with the maximum feasible participa-
tion of the residents of the areas and members of the groups se�ved..: ' Such participation is essential
not only to enable the poor to become self-sufficient, but also to ensure that the community changes
and improvements which ACCAP promotes are, in fact, �esponsive and relevant to the low income
citizens affected.
�
In order to reduce the isolation of the poor and to inform the larger community of the needs and aspira-
tions of the poor, the Agency will work to stimulate increased community responsiveness, throuoh
greater community commitment, a deeper awareness, and sensitivity, and the mobilization of
resources.
Our Agency's effectiveness, iherefore, is measured not only by the direct activities, which are provid-
ed by the Agency; but also by the improvemenis in the community's attitude and practices toward the
poor, and in the increased allocation and focusing of public and private resources for anti-poverty pur-
poses.
�tIT[,EY QTY SENIOR QJTREA�i
Septenber 1, 1987 to May 31, 1988
. �! �
Personriel
$4.83 x 24 hrs. per week x 9 weeks
$4.93 x 24 hrs. per week x 30 weeks
subtotal
Fringe benef its @ 268
(FI�, tfiemPloyment, workers Oompensation,
Insuranoe, and trainings)
Travel
.25 x 2000
Other Costs
Spaoe, tel ephone, mail ings, and other
wnsunable supQl ies.
Acfiinistrative expense @ 108
Supervisor/Finanve
subtotal
Zbtal
$1,043
3,55Q
$4,593
$1,194
$ 500
$6,28'1
Inkind
S 628
$ 628
$6,915
11S
Category
Personnel
Fringe
11T
ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTtON PROGRAM, lNC.
8008 N.E. HIGHWAY 65 • SPRMG LAKE PARK, MN 55432 • PHONE 784-2443
TravelfTraining
Admin
Total
City of Fridley
Senior Outreach Program
6/1/86 to 5/31/87
Approved
Budget
4538.00
1180.00
500.00
622.00
$6840.00
Actual
Thru 3/31
3217.18
772.12
555.60
454.49
$4999.39
Plus
Plus
Projected
Thru 5/31
1444.30
156.80
Plus 72.00
Plus 167.51
Plus $1840.61
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Balance
C123.48 j
251.08
� 2� . 6�,
-0-
-0-
EDUCATION:
EXPERZENCE:
1981 to present
RESUME � �U
Stephen M. Klein, AICP
University of Minnesota, Bachelor of Science in Urban
Studies with concentrations in Planning, Research,
and Political Science. 1974
Director of Planninq and Community Programming for
Anoka County Community Action Proqram, Inc.
1977 to present President of Preferred Plaflninq Services, Inc. Pra-
viding professional Planninq Services to several
cities�; townships, private developers and non profit
organizations.
1977 to 1980
1976 to 1977
1975
1974
AREAS OF SPECIALTY:
Comprehensive Planning Director for the City of
St. Francis, Minnesota.
Program Planner for the Anoka County Community Action
Program, Inc.
Research Assistant £or the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency. Conducted needs assessment studies and made
recommendations for legislative action.
Intern for Minnesota Planninq Agency, Office of Local
and Urban Affairs. Conducted needs assessment duties
for the training needs of local government officials.
Comprehensive Planning: Consultant services to local units of government on
developznent of comprehensive plans, policy planninQ,
land use, envfronmental regulations and implementation.
Needs Assessment/ Assistance to non profit orqanizations in assessinq
Program Planning: community needs, evaluating existing services, and
identifing resources and strategies to implement
required services.
Community Economic . Assistance to local units of government and Local
Development: Development Corporations in setting up and carryincr
out strategies for effective broad based community
econo�mic development utilizing federal, state, and
local resources.
Housing Development: Assistance to local units of governmant and non
profit orqanizations developing, reviewing and
implementing housing projects for low and moderate
income residents.
Professional
Affiliations:
REFERENCES
American Planning Association 1980
American Institute of Certified Planners 1985
Available on request.
Elaine Vangerud
69 W. County ROAD F
Vadnais Heights, MN 55110
(612) 490-1700
EMPLOYMENT OBJECTIVES
A position in the human service or management field utilizing
administrative, organizational, counseling and teaching skills.
QUALIFICATIONS
11v
Twelve years as director of volunteers in four senior programs
Experience in counseling, training, and supervising
Research experience in needs of elderly in ten counties
Successful in promoting, persuading and motivating people
Worked with all types of people - Slacks, S.E. Asians, low-income, elderly,
and people in both public and private sectors
AREA OF COMPETENCE
Administrative Skills
Directed programs for elderly in St. Paul, MN and Anoka
Developed ne� Coordfnator of Volunteer Servfces position
and nursing fiome
Created Senior Opportunities Director position
Directed Project Awareness survey in ten counties for MN
Trained 600 volunteers to visit 9,500 elderly
Supervised staff and volunteers in visitation of elderly
Developed follow-up program to needs of elderly
Planned and implemented Senior Transportation Board
Coordinated transportation program for seniors in three
Purchased vans (mini-busses) for seniors
County MN.
in hospital
Board on Aging
counties
Contacted and consulted with city councils, county commissioners,
foundations, corporations, private business and churches
Negotiated with other social service organizations to coordinate
programs
Wrote several grants and sought funding programs
Coordinated use of co�mmunity services for elderly
Acted as 1'iaison between services for elderly and the elderly
Organizational Skiils
Secured volunteers for various programs
Organized volunteer qYOUps for survey follow-up
Helped seniors organize and develop congregate meal sites
Participated in Senior Advisory Council along with other social
service organizations
Organized and directed several musical groups in schools, churches,
and communities
Counseling Skills
Responsible for counseling elderly on financial problems
Advocate on behalf of elderly for Supplemental Security Income
One-to-one counseling for senior citizens
Participated in group counseling
11W
Speaking and Writing
wrote articles for newspapers and periodicals
Had 15 minute daily radio program on WCAL
Conducted class study of elderly at St. Cloud State University
Represented and spoke on behalf of elderly, youth and volunteers
Designed and made posters and charts
EXPERIEI3CE
Coordinator of Senior Programs and Volunteer Services - Recruit, train and
supervise Anoka County Senior Sefrienders, develop volunteer program at
ACCAP, supervise seven Senfor Outreach Workers
Director of Volunteer Services - United District Hospital and Home, Staples,
Minnesota. Developed volunteer program, secured, trained and super-
vised volunteers.
Director - Summit-University Senior Outreach and Advocacy Program - St.
Paul, Minnesota. Supervised volunteers and staff who knocked on doors
to find needy elderly and assisted them in securing help to meet these
needs. •
Director of Survey and Senior Opportunities - Tri-County Community Action
Program, St. Cloud, Minnesota. Directed survey of needs of elderly in
ten counties using 600 volunteers. Set up Senior Transportation
Program in three counties.
EDUCATION
St. Olaf College, Northfield, Minnesota B.A. degree in music and English
St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota, advanced study in
subjects relating to ps-ychology, culturally deprived and behavioral
problems.
Nietro Council Department on Aging, St. Paul, Minnesota. In depth
study in Awareness and Outreacfi taught by faculty from Augsburg
college, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
� __ 1
' FOR CUNCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- CLAIMS
October 19, 1987
Claims
16838 - 17064
, �� BY TNE CITY COUNCIL -- LICENSES 1
FOR CONCURRENCE
OCTOBER 19, 1987
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
Central Remodeling & Siding
P.O. Box 290037
blinneapolis, MN 55429
Rod Day Company
2957 - 108th Lane N.W.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Karkela Construction
6531 Cambridge Street
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
Kaymar �terprises Znc.
P.O. Box 425
Bemidji, MN 56601
Minnesota Exteriors
295 Highway #55
Hamel , riN 55340
Olson Concrete Co.
5010 Hillsboro Avenue North
New Hope, MN 55428
'I`,;in Cit}� Fireplace
1525 West River Road
t�iinneapolis , F�1 55411
R. P. Vogel and Company Inc.
2601 Bloomington Avenue South
Alinneapolis, MN 55407
HERTIN�
�Sodern Heating & Air Cond. Inc.
2318 - lst Street P_E.
Minneapolis, MN 55418
New Mech Companies, Inc.
1633 �stis Street
Lauderdale, MN 55108
Shank Mechanical Inc.
3501 - 85th Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 554A3
MASON RY
Skatke Construction Co.
5242 France Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, bII�l 55429
By: Richard wiest
By : Fmdney Day
Sy ; Larry Karkela
By ; Marland Winans
By; Pat Tinsley
By; Bob Olson
By: John Prom
By: Richard Vogel
By: Terry Hutchinson
By : Larry Jordan
By : Mi ch ae 1 Sh ank
By: Duane Klatke
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg. Ofcl.
S ame
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
WILLIAAS SAI3DIN
Plbg.-Htg. Insp.
Same
Same
Chief Bldg. Ofcl.
DARREL CLARK
� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CtTY COUNGlL -- LICENSES
�
RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY
�.l�l�' • • • �1 : _ � �; 1�� � _ . ,. ��ar : T
— � ..
. .
Todd B. Fuechtmann 7417-19 Able Street
3985 99th Lane N.E.
Coon Rapids, [�Mt 55433
R. 3ames Day 5940 East River Roa�d
3242 Sandeen Road
Arden Hills, NAT 55112
John Waldahl 7851-55 Firwood Way
7855 Firwood Way N.E.
Fridley, r'A1 55432
Richard L. Degnpsey 6341 Highway #65
10415 - 28th Avenue N.
Plymouth, NQV 55441
David & Beverly Menken 4042 Main Street
Paul & Siisan Gaydos
375 Belmont La. E.
Maplewood, NIIV 55117
Dan & Mary Lutz 5981-83 Main Street
A445 Quincy St. NE
ColuQnbia Heights, MN 55421
Laurence & Karen Russell 6011 Main Street
6011 Main St. I�
Fridley� NQI 55432 �
Maynard & Elayne Nielsen 157 Mississippi P1.
7144 Riverview Terr.
Fridley, NIl�1 55432
Bang Nguyen & � 1392 Osborne Road
Phong Doan
9790 Monroe St. 1�
Blaine, NII�I 55434
Mark L. Clasen 6345 Pierce Street
6345 Pierce St. NE
Fridley, hII�1 55432
Duane Levandaaski 6361 Pierce Street
R �2, Box 234A
Somerset, WI 54025
Cheryl Nybo 5809 Tennison Drive
1612 Berne Cir. NE
Fridley; I�II3 55421
2 24.00
12 49.00
1 12.00
10 49.00
2 24.00
2 24.00
4 36.00
4 36.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
■
lf
�
� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL " ESTIMATES
�
October 19, �987
Layr.e �!innesota
3147 California St., N.E.
Minneapolis, NAI 55u18
41e11 #1 Repair Project
FINAL ES TIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$17, 573�•00
Park Construction
7900 Beech Street
Fridley, hT1 55�32
Irlater & Sewer Projeet �162
FINAL FSTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50, 7�8.07
Eugene A. Hickok & Associates
545 Indian N,ound
�Fayzata, NIN 55391
Pioore Lake Phase II Project �1u9
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,021.64
Sunde Engineering
9001 E. Bloomington Freewa}-
Eloomington, N�T 55420
Uemolition & Site Grading Project �163
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,995.50
TKDA
2500 American National Bank Building
St. Paul, MtJ 55101
Rep2ir of Commons Park Fil tration P12nt �164
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4, 900.00
Er.ebak Construction
P.O. Box 458
Northfield, I�IN 55057
Demolition & Site Grading Projeet �163
Estimate No. 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $52, 892 •57
Minnesota Valley Landscape, Inc.
9700 West Bush Lake Road
M.inneapolis, Nff1 55�38
Landscaping, Irrigation & Lighting Project �t168
Estimate No. 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $47,7�2•25
Northwe st As� al t
1451 Co. Road #89
Shakopee, Mt1 55375
Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1987 - 1
Estimate No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7, 611 .88
��ITY OF FRIDLEY
EN6INEERIN6 DE?pRTMENT
b431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY. MN. 55432
Date: D�tober 19, 1487
To: HONDRABLE MAYDR and CITY CDUNCIL
CITV Of FRI6LEY
b431 UNIVEASITY AVENtIE N.E.
FRIDLEV, MINNESOTA 55432
ftE: Est. Na. 1 iFinal)
Per. Ending: Qctoher 14, 1987
For: Layne Minnesata Co.,
3147 California St. N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55418
41ELL 11
STATEMENI DF V9DRK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COHTRaCT Pk06P,E55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRACT ITEM Estimated Unit 9uantita 9+santitv Aeouat
Quantities Price This Est. To Oate Ta Date
Pull Insoect and
Reinstall Pumo
Rub6er Bearinas
5' Line 5haft
10' Line Shaft
Sleeves
14' Suction Piae
!4' Column Pipe
5' Colu�n Pioe
Too Spe�ial �riveshaft
Bowl 9earino
Ne►+ Imaellers
Boz 5aiders
Pump Packinn
Bushino
BoNI 5haft
Additonal Parts
5S. Driveshaft
Shaft Couplinos
8° 8alv. Cone
5trainer
Stads/Nuts-Rowls
BoNi Asse�bly
Airline
5and Blast - li�eshaft
Bail IJeli - Coluon Pipe
Disinfect - Pu�p
TDTAL
1
29
1
lb
4
i
24
1
1
5
J
5
I
1
1
1
16
1
1
S
1
1
1
1
f2,500.60
20.00
b4.40
89,40
29.50
118.40
182.50
100.40
440.00
3Q.04
z5.oa
30.00
SQ.00
IOQ.00
175.00
0. OU
_ 7. 00
1
29
i
I6
4
0
24
1
1
U
a
5
1
1
0
1
lb
1
29
1
16
4
0
24
i
1
0
0
5
1
1
0
1
16
350.00 1 1
84.Q0 1 1
3,320,40 0 1
75.OQ 1 1
Z54.40 ! 1
1,O75.Q0 1 1
2,350.Q0 1 1
SZ,JUO,OO
580.00
69.00
1,424.00
118.00
O.OU
4,380.00
1Q0.00
440.00
O.OG
O.OU
150.OU
50.00
IOQ.OU
0.40
4.00
112.00
350.00
80.00
3,320.40
75. 4(!
250.00
1,075.Q0
2,354.�0
511,513.00
15A
15B
sunnA�Y:
0!iqinal Contract Amount
Contract Addition5 - Chanae Qrder Nu..
Contract Qeductians - Chanae 4rder Nos.
Revised Contract Amount
Value Completed To Date
5UH ?DTAL
A�ount Retained (IOXI (5Z1
Less Amount Paid Previouslv
AMQUNT DUE THIS ESiIMATE
CEATIFICAiE df iNE CONTkACTdR
-----------------------------
f23,445.40
0.00
e.00
0.00
f17,573,00
fl7.573.OU
0.00
o.ac�
17,573.00
I herebvi certifv that the Nork oerformed and the eaterials supplied to
date under terms of the �ontract far the reference pralect, and all
authorized chanaes thereto, Aave an actual value under the cflntract af
the anount5 shown on thia esti�ate land the final ouantities of the
final estimate are correctl. and that this estimate is iust and correct
and n� part "Aeount Due This Esti4ate` has been received.
Bv _� : ��z�! J��..'C!�~ .U_: � _`_'`9. Oate /��/ � --
ractor s Authori:ed Repres ive tTitle?
CERTIfICATE OF THE ENGINEER
---------------------------
I herehy certify that I I�ave prepared or exa+sined this esti�ate, and
that the tontractor is entitled to payment of this esti�ate under the
contra�t for referen�e croject.
CITV DF FRI�LEY, INSPECTOR
BY� C/�''`=-'�_
Checked Bv:
Date �_�___ � "
� � {��_`� �)
Respectfully 5ub�itted,
�
� ��Q
.�-�,�_ ��G City of Fridley
By /-= J ' ' ---------
- - =���L�_t_�,.r._..--
�n G. Flora. P.E.
Director of F'ublic Works
October 19, 1987
To: Public Works Director
City of Fridley
15C
� .��.� �� ��� ,�'�� �� ��_�
M4 • � 1� �a�'�
.t _ � � ui' o� � u��l��
We, the tmdersic�ed, have inspected the above mentioned proj ect and f ind that
the work required b� the contract is substantially complete in conformity
with the glans and specif ications of the proj ect.
All deficiencies have been corrected tr� the oontractor. Also, the work for
whirh the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been
agreed upon by the contractor.
So, therefore, we rea�n4nend to you that the City apprcxre the attached FINAL
ESTIr9ATE for the oontractor.
BN/t s
3�l 6! 4/ 10
�/
�'�' �-�* `i % Q L' "�. �.''" _ st" _____
Ralph Vollanan, Public Works Superintendent
�G ..�'���� ,�
�Li" �.-, Cu �/v%1�
Contractor Representative, (Title)
October 19, 1987
City of Fridley
y • I••� � !�1
a+y :_4 �� .1 ���14�.���.
�is is to certify that items of the work shawn in the statement of work
certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above
menti�ed projects in acoordance with the glans and specifications heretofore
apprwed. Zhe final contract cost is 517,573.00 and the final payment of
517,573.00 for the impravenent project would cover in full, the oontractor `s
claims against the City for all labor, rr�terials and other work done by the
oontractor �der this project.
I declare �der the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and
correct.
LA�iE 1�NNESOTA QJNIPANY
- �J �' �� `%�� ���,
�_ . z' ' � �u �
----�_--
Contractor Representative, Title
JT/ts
3/ 6/ 4/ 9
15D
15E
QTY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC WCg2KS DEPARTI4�NT
ENGINEERING DIVI5ION
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
October 19, 1987
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ci ty of Fri dl ey
c% Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager
6431 [kiivexsity Avenue N.E.
Fridle�, hN 55432
Council Members:
�+�+ _;_4 • w± �+�. �!��
We hereby surmit the Final Estimate ior Well No. 1 Improv�nents for Layne
Minnesota Cflmpany, 3147 Cal ifornia St. , N. E. , Minneap�l is, NN, 55416.
We have viEwed the work under contract for the construction
Impravements and �ind that the same is substantially oomplete
with the contract doczunents. I recommend that f inal payment
acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body.
Respectfully su�mitted,
�" . �
� �� .
�," _ �'�' i �.�-�l--z-.__
John G. Fl or a
Public Works Director
BN/ts
3/ 6/ 4I 11
of Well No. 1
in accordance
be made upon
:� ,. � � ,�.C�.
Pre�r ed by r'' fi-�'=�- ��'�.
.
Checked by : � �`�-�
r�,rp; ;:,i�� a= �ridleY Enoineerin� Jivi:ion
;p: No^�-�b.e Mayor and Citr Council
Citv of fridley
���1 !�ni,ersitY A��enue N.E.
�ridieY� M:r,ne5ota 5543?
uN?F: C�iG;;ER 19. 1481
CIT1 OF FRID�Ei Fi1i�tlC '�DRkS isEf'HR;!�EN!
6431 UfdiVEkSITY A'iEill;E N.E.
FAIOLEI, MIN�:���TA 5543?
t�ATEft AtdC SAtiljAf'.r �E�ER .MF'AJVEl4Etli PRt�1E;.' �1b2
nE: E�tiQate No. - GI"ifiL
Period Endi�a: :D-i'�-3i
FOR: PAP.K CG"lSIkUCTIQM C0.
;90� BEECH STREET N.E.
FkIOLEti' MN. 55432
23b-31-Gi}C�
STATEMENI Cf 4�ORP:
---------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED 11NIT �Uf�PITITY TNIS TiiTFI
C:iN?kACt IIEM !?UANTITY FRICE UNIT ESTIHaTE TOTAt A"OUNT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
�° iu�til� Pi�e
;u° �u�,:le F'iGe
b' N�;d�ant ;ssee6lv i Gate !;a:ve
3" 5ate S'ai•:e
:v° 9�; CeGree Bend
3"S �'';( °' 7ee
'.��° :? 1,'2 C�e�ree Eends
�' 45 Ca�;ae Eends
lU° u�te 4'alve
6° � I.F.
.; .
Y�Fll�if:�:d RGCk fC� H'�rd.
Ra:k For F:ce Reddinc
�BX J�n CJ" 1ee �
yII�4 1v��h ,� T��
o' ��ate :'alre
12°x !: „ �" Li�•e Tap
;?°z ?:"� 10" Live iap
�'X �.,X i�.i� Ll'v'a Td0
b�X b"X QP �lY? T3G
b9 ��u�
��� f�lU�
u
1J'x :u°;: 3' Tee
�utside Drc;, Manhole
9' P.�d.C. tU-lU`)
6" P.','.C, i10-12')
8' ?.V.;.. ;l�-1�'i
a° F�.v.c. ct�-t���
p� p.�r�..r,. �:0-�O �
S' f.�lt�ti• ����iul�
Cor.struc} !"�nhole
iie ;nto �xist. M. H.
;e�a. 5treet Fatchir.o
L.O.�:
------------------------------------
IJiAt
�117
��
i9LJ
1!
1J
1
!
13
2
5
.JJV
?U
5�5
4
7
i
1
i
l
1
!
1'�
ll
3.1
642
351
492
48?
517
4b9
170
2
5UU
1
I8.ti0 Lin. Ft.
21.04 lin. Ft.
1.317.u0 Each
;;47.t�0 Each
145.�:u Each
t33.00 Each
;?u.56 tath
l02.i0 Each
52±�.�:0 Each
13.tb Lin. Ft.
�1.40 Cu. YC.
1�.(�� TO(1
l3��.�JO Each
119.uU Ea�h
2=s.a� Ea_n
l,!?5.44 Each
t,.;�5.U0 Ea�h
1.U75.00 E�ch
Bi5.Q0 Ea�h
4t.71 Each
51.30 Each
li�.ti0 Each
185.U0 Lin. ft.
15.�5 li�. ft.
15.95 Lin. Ft.
15.72 Lin. Ft.
il,b5 lin. Ft.
18.75 lin. ft.
20.1�0 Lin. Ft.
1t3.�0 Lin. Ft.
300.UD Ea:h
1.�J �Jl�. �i�.
5E.'0. JO Lur;n Su�
JJI
181
?
J
0
u
6
l}
i
1 i;5
4
�74�
L
3
i
p
0
1
ii
1
4
J
u
ti
138
JQ.7
25
so
JB
3u
i
135
1
15F
?;q? d?."B_.00
�II�S b7 � 1 i D. L��� ..
li 15.$`J4.QU �
ia �,e�s.���
1 f45.L0
g b65.LQ
15 1,7�?.���
2 �i:5.4+1
j G.tliG.:':i .
:iul J.',i��:.�f:
i: 4'U.�n
SG5 i •'_bL�.iiU
q "n ��
Ji+.�J
8 1.4? �. �;+;
� '�i�'.CJ
�. �
t '..l.�.ii�.;
i 1.�65.�:�i
1 L.C��J.�vi� �
1 615.GU
? 33.4�
1� b!5.t+:
1: �.�4�.Q�1
t� 0. U �,
559 t�J,G4R,75
?b5 4.[�b.75
591 9,°SS.84
469 8.217.65
65U t?,187.50
�b5 11.?Uc7. �0
1B2 �O.�b6.0�1
2 6oc.�u
4:� 761.:5
1 56:�:. Ju
Sxz3.°°n.�3
�.��:1!'i''� i .
ur;Qirdl C�.^?r.Ct h�;0'.:n;
_::e:rz:t �d�i!ic�.� .�a:^,we urder # 1
��=tratt ?'edi:.ti��r;�
Revi sed �or�tract n*c:ur,t
'�alue Co+aaleted T:, Late
r�c.:a't netai^e� 15�!
Le55 ��ou*,t Faid Pre:�icu51��
AP�"U!;T ��� ?NI5 ES?tYATE ;�+�cc::nt Code �517—QG—�O��i
C�F'T:=ICA?E Gf 'N� COP�i�;CTOR
15G
3��`.�:.lili�,(�;7
f 45 ,':: , ��:
; :�.cc
i�33.82�;�.u:�
f2'd,4�5>`s6
E+;�. GG
#i���?4�.Ji
3�O.i48.0,
i here�vi certi4�: tR�at ,he +:arY. per4oreei and the �aterials supplied to date under the te��s o� the tentract io� tF,;s
erc�e�t. :.^d a:l z�thcrized �haraes thereto, have ar, actual value ur,�er the centrart n4 the a�eun±s st:oa� ❑n this
estiR�ate ;a�d th? fi�al auantities on the final z=ti�ate dr� currect?, a^d thct thi= esti�aa}e is just and currect ar�� n�
rt �� �he ��,:unt ry::e T^i: E=ti�ba'e" ha5 5e2� rEteive�.
i3te ------------------
,,.-:!r.::`c�r s ru:h4Ti:.d Re�resen#ati,�e �Titiei
���:T?^;Ct",`E G� T4c E?i6It�EER
:`�er�br cer,:fv that I���ve ore�ared or er.aained this estie!ate, and that the co^tractar is e^titled t:; Oa��.en} of tr:s
G:1:�:�}� ;;^LC'C :�;t� C:J^:CGl� TO� !C1L(e��'�C �iO}Qit.
c_";DE E;`;G?i,=ckl;'��: i?�fC.
�: �
---------------------------------------
��,�a�u suy�� �.�. F�E�lti2^t
�,i,eC%Q1� �Y` - _�-- - - - ���"�.�
;:N ?H�!�; �.,, Ir,��et±,�r
Da}e
------------------
F'eSGe[tfully 5ubi�itte�,
---------------------------------------
Jeh� 6. flr,ra.F.E.
FuGiic �fcrks Dire,ta�
�
October 19, 1987
To: Publ ic Wor ks Di rector
City of Fridley
15H
;�z�;� •� �4 � '��f •+ ��•'
My • �; N y1
.G M�±: • .: �1 : �+ '���1�►: •'v!. �s�
: : �� ��k •! ; :� : ; 4 M�►�4�.
We, the �ndersic�ed, have inspected the above mentiosied project and find that
the work required b� the oontract is substantially complete in conformity
with the plans and specif ications of the proj ect.
All deficiencies have been oorrected by the oontractor. Also, the work for
which the City feels the oontractor should receive a reduced price has been
agreed upon by the contractor.
So, therefore, we reo�rmiend to you that the City apprave the attached FINAL
FSTZl�SATE for the oontractor and the o�ne-year maintenanoe bond, starting f ran
the day of the final inspection that being October 15, 1987.
JT/PS/ts
3/6!4/10
Paul 9weris�n, Construction Inspector
Contractor Representative, (Tit1e)
October 19, 1987
City of Fridley
/•� �• � a ?• • •�• sM
• � �• r ► �� . .� . .� •�+ r�+•
_�;� �. �f • 4�I �� ��k�: ��� .
�is is to oertify that items of the work shvwn in the statement of work
certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above
mentioned projects in aocordance with the plans and specifications heretofore
apprwed. 7he final o�ntract cost is 550,748.07 ana the final payment of
5238,996.58 for the imprwenent project would cover in full, the oontractor's
claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work done by the
oontractor ulder this project.
I c3eclare �der the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and
correct.
"• •• 1' M I• �• 1••
Greg Boel ke, Proj ect Manager
JT/t S
3✓ 6/ 4/ 9
151
i
i
QTY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC WQ2.KS DEA'�RTNENT
E�IGINF..FRIl� DIVISI�JN
6431 tfiiversity Avenue N. E.
Fridl�r, Miru�esota 55432
October 19, 1987
Honorable I�ayor and City Cotmcil
City of FricIley
c% Nasim M. Qureshi, City NHnager
6431 ifiiver sity Avenue N. E.
Fridley, MJ 55432
Couu�cil M�nbers:
�:�Y : Y �, 4.i a��, �i��+;
We hereby su�mit the Final Estimate for Water & Sewer Project #162, Lake
Fbinte Corporate Center for P�rk Construction Co. , 7900 Beech Street, N. E. ,
Frldley, M�l, 55432.
We have viewed the work under v�ntract for the v�nstruction of Water & Sewer
Project #162, Lake Pointe Corporate Center and f ind that the same is
substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I
reoommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your
Hanorable Body and that the or�e-year �ntractual mairitenance bond canmence an
October 15, 1987.
Respectfully surmitted,
Gerry S�mde.
Proj ect Engineer
BNItS
3✓ 6/ 4/ 11
- .- _. .
i
• - -. • �ly, //,st !r/
�
l.�i'J