Loading...
06/27/1988 CONF MTG - 5028t f � ! G . � i i � i ;' CITY OF FRIDLEY CONFERENCE MEETING JUNE 27, 1988 7:30 P.M. 1. Review of Civic Center and Fridley Plaza Ramp Proposetl Plans and ProJected Construction Schedule in ConJunction with FridleY HRA 2. Discussion of �laintenance and Upkeep Funding for Environmental and Aesthetic Public Improvements by HRA and the City 3. Discussion of the Zonin9 Ordinance Chan9e in R-1 to Discoura9e Double Family Use 4. Update on Fridley Recycling Program 5. Discussion of Revised Layout at TCF Banking and Savin9s, 5205 Central Avenue NE 6. Analysis of Salaries of Part-Time Employees 7. E:� .� Presentation of Departmental Request for 1989 Budget Other� Hr : . r ! , -€_..t'l.. 0 r � � cinroF F��� �: FROM: DATE: RE: C011IlMUNITY DEVELOPMENI' DEPARTIV�ENT MEMORANDUM rlasim Qureshi, city r2ana�er Jock Rd�ertsoa�. Clxntnmity Develoginent Director June 23, 1988 Update of Projected Schedule for Review and Action on Civic Center Plans This is an t�date of my Jime 20, 1988 mem to you with the latest proj ected timetables: * Moaiday, Jiu�e 27, 1988 at 9:30 a.m. - Departznent Heads meeting with Boarman and Associates ar�d Bossardt CY�ristensen; 7:30 p.m, - joint City Council/HIZA c�nference with Boarnari and Associates (BA) and Bossardt Ci�rister�n (BC) to review all praposed plans. * Thursday, July ?, 1988 2:00 p.m. - bids c3ue on all Civic Center and parking ramp oantracts, except electrical. * Friday, July 8, 1988 throu� Tuesday, July 12, 1988 - BC deliver bids to HIZA f ar rainp. * Thursday, July 14, 1988, 2:00 p.m. - bids on electrical work; 7:30 p.m. - arcYiitect and a�nstruction manager reco�nendations to I�tA for review and possible actia� {electrical: possible e�aception). * FYiday, July 22, 1988, 11:00 a.m. - architect and construction manager reoa�m�endations to City Cour�cil � all Civic Center oo�tracts. * Moa�day, July 25, 1988, 9:30 a.m� - Department Heads meeting; 7:30 p.m. - regular City Cbtmcil meeting at Co�rn.mity Ed. Center. Acticaz on awarding all Civic Center contracts. I�7I�: At this time the City Council obviously has the option of contimiing discussicm at a special meeting � postponing f inal acticn tnitil the regularly scl�uled City C7c,xuycil a�eeting on August 8, 1988. JI,R/dn .r 1�88-154 MEMORANDUM � CJTIf OF FRtDIFIf _ CIVIC CENTER• •4�11MNERS�TY AYE.N.E. f11DLEr.111MNESOTA 664iZ •pNpNE(t12)s71-i460 I�ND T0: Fllil: SZJB�TECT: DATE: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER NASIM M.OURESHI •i • n • � � • u • �� � • • i� • � � • 1 ' �� M �� I M� r• � �� r �:� i+wM y�:.►�ti�+; �►: 1►�4:,�►►: � • ��1��� �� C i J:_ �r�� ��/����4- J�]E 3, 1988 Public improvanents which enhance the ernrirormient of the City have implications for ongoing maintenance costs over and above the maintenance costs prior to the i�rwenents. Since both the HRA and the City CouT�cil establish policy relating to major enviroranental impravements, it is important to keep in mind each impravement's iut�lications for long ternn maintenance. Another way of stating the same principle is that the success of a major public impravenent is often measured not by the initial quality of the proj ect but rather by the long-ten�n impact of the proj ect - by the quality c� the design wer time - throught proper maintenance. Recognizi.ng this fact, I a¢n reco�nmending that both the HRA and the City Council establish a policy of reserving funds for adequate maintenance whenever a maj or erivirornnental imprv�rement proj ect is apprwed. I am suggesting that the minimtun level of maintenance be 50� of the construction eosts ar arie thi�l of the entire proj ect cost. Thus, for e�le, if the construction oost of the University Avenue Cbrridor D�snonstration Project is estimated to be $1.5 million, at least $750,000 s�wuld be set aside in a maintenance trust fund so that the total praject oost would be $2.25 millian. It is my hc�pe that this matter could be the subject of discussion at the June 9 meeting o� the HI�A and at the June 27 conference meeting aF the City C3ouncil so that a clefini.te policy could be adopted. 1�/ss .r 4/10 . � � cinroF F��� COl1liMLiNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART'1V�ENT M EMO RAN D UM I� �: Nasim Qureshi, G�ty Manager I�END PRa+I: Jock Robertson, Q�mninity Develapnent Director 1�'�Ni� nATE: March 24, 1988 R�GARDING: Illegal Duple�aes in Single Family Zones I have reoeritiy reviewed this problen with David Newman, City Attorney's off ive. Sectian 205. 03.24 (see attac�ment ) def ines a Dwel l ing, One Fam ily, as "A detached building desic�ed exclusively for oocupancy tr� one (]� family. I�nber 27. clef ir�es Family as "An indivic3ual or two or more persons related by blood, marriage ar adoptioai -- subj ect to the f Allawing o�ndition: "A. Mor e than five (5) �related pers�ns living in a dweting ta�it shall �t aonstitute a fanily. " This has been interpreted to mean up to f ive tmrel ated persons may live in se�xirate parts of a single f�nily dwelling unit. At the time that building permits were issued for the subject dwelling units, the permitee was ir�o�med by letter c� the requiren�ts of the Zoning Code (see attaci�nent ) . It w�ould appear that the Coincil has s+everal aptio�s: L Gbntinue to simgly enforoe the existing Code by periodically making sure �t more than five unrelated persons live in the two separate living areas within the single faaily dwelling. 2. Reoerit case laa inc3icates that �nder aertain a�nditions the Zoning Code may be enforaed retroactively to require that a building be physically attered to oonform to the Code. Under such a scenario, the existing buildings aould be required to: a) have locks renwed on the two separate entry doors off the oomaaon f oyer. , b) have me c� the entry doors and door frame o�f the foyer entirely rena�ved, c) revise the Zoning Code definitio�a of 'bwelling and Family", to indicate that the htilding may have a seoond segar ate 1 iv ing ar ea, but enkra�nnc�e ta the second living area must be gained through one of the hahitatale rvams of the first living area. 7l�is would appear to..eatisfy � for a� extended fanily living situation, such as an elderly parent or marriec3 brother and wife, etc. while discouraging the one family dwelling fram being used as a two fanily dwelling desicyied exclusively for oocupancy by two f anil ies 1 iving inc3ependently of ea� other. I sug4est we review these cptians with the Cotmcil for their oonsideration and directian to prooeed. JI.Ii/c�n M-88-71 _ _ � � � c�nroF F��� COl1/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTIV�ENT MEMORANDUM i� R+�: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager NEI� FRQ�i: Jock Robertson, tunmuzity Develqment Director 1�EM� DAQ'E: Agril 29, 1988 ImGHRDING: Illegal Duple�aes In reviewing the present violations of the intent a� the R-1 zociing ordinanae and the anhiguities of the def initions in the a�dinanoe, it would appear that there are two alternatives. Either: L Ref ine the def initian of 27. F�,N�Y, o� 2. Ref ine the def inition of a I�niII�LIIVG LTNIT. It would appear that the latter alternative is by far the more enforc�eable approac�. �e Edina City ordinanoe uses a def inition of "Dwell ing Unit" to ac3�ieve the objective of indicating that a building may have a second separate living area whidi is aooessed throuc� a habitahle roan a� the first living area. We have prepared the attadzed suggested modif ications to the definitions portion of the Fridley City Code to inoorporate the Edina approaci�. In these modif ications you will see that the def initions have Multiple, Single and Two F�nily Dwelling refers to the n�nnber of dwelling units and then the Edina c7welling tu�it definition has been substituted to link with the zor,e descriptions. These proposals are aonsistent with our retroa.ctive enfaraement af the adinanve in the cases of Mr. Billman and Mr. Anc3erson and prevent a lvwer level with an outside aooess f rcm being seal ed of f ent i rely from an �per level. �R/dn IrI-88-i13 J � � cinroF fRIDL�Y C011/IMUNI'i'Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTIV�ENT MEMORANDUM IrEM�-�: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager I�ENrJ FRoNi: Jock Robertson, �ua�nity Develcypaent Director I�ENi� II�TE : May 13, 1988 RDGARDING: Ille�gal Dupiexes As a follaw up to City Council review of my April 29, 1988 memo to you regarding illegal duplexes, Council directed staff to explore two ather alternatives: 1. ���?d t1;e singl am;�y �nr1� allow an extra 7iv?nq area for re7at�ves_ or extended fami j�y� b�t Drohibit the rentinq o such a livin9 area for j,�,C�fiti After consultation of David Newman, City Attorney, we have concluded that this approach is probably illegal and awkward to acfiiruster. Previous opinion issued by the Minneapolis City Attorney's off ioe regarding the saane questions in Minneapol is' proposed "mansion zone" referred to oonstitutional issues in attempting to limit occupants of housing to faanily and relatives through the zoning ordinance. Further, the attempt to make ac�ninistrative decisions on whether a "prof it" is being made would involve pouring through check books, financial statements and tax returns and would probably require the eerv iaes of a CTA. 2. How does �he definition of dwe7linq un;t in the zonina c«]e amnn r�e_with that used fn_r city license in�ect�ons? Lioensing and inspections Sectim 220.05 uses the sa¢ne definitian o� dwelling unit that appears in the zoning Code Section 205.03. Both wo�a t� ���a to the Edina dwelling �nit definitirn as outlir�ed in my memo to you of April 29, �1988. Hawever, the definitions €o� c�e2ling and multiple dwelling in these two sectirns are differem and probebly should be standardized the next time with the City orc3inanoes a�dif ied. I+bre importantly, the 1 ioensing and inspectia�s prooedure allvws the applicant to declare the type and the nunber af dwelling �nits in an applicatian for a liaense. Haseed on the abo�ve aonclusians I reaomnend that if the City Q�u�cil wishes to prooeed on ref ining the def initions between duplexes and single f a�aily residenoes, we use the modif ications to a def initi ons 23, 24, 25 and 26 of the Zoning Code as attached to my April 29, 1988 memo and also attached hereto. .A,Ft/dn oc: David Newman M-88-132 205.03.29. 1g. L1ay �re, Q�e�able Ploor �rea. primary sFaoe excl�ive of hallways, brathzoans. lockezs, kitchens► and floor speoe occupied by sanitary equipnent, but not including equipment an6 furnishings regularly used by the children• (Rei• 864) Z0. District. A section -or sections of the inoorperated area of the City for whi� the teie ta�iform8f e chsclass of use penui te6 thezelnuilding and '. land a _ i ?.i. Drive+ay. A private hardsurfaoed road giving access from a public way to a building or abutting gro�ds. 22. Dvelling. A tesidential building. hotels, motels, boarding► vehicles or Lents. or portion thereof, but not including rorning or lodging houses, recreational 23. Dve]1ing. Multiple. A building or pcstion thereof desicned for xcupancy by twc ili or more farnil ies 1 iving independently of each other in se arace dwellin units . 24. Dvelling.Ore-P'amily. A detached builcling desic,g�ed exclusively for iamily and containing one (1) dwelling unit. 25. Dve3ling. ZVo-Family. or occupancy by tM►o (2) families and containing tvo �2) dwelling units. occupancy by one (1? A building desic�ed exclusively f living inc3ependently of eac�, other. 26. ArPll.ing Onitt. o�e-1�-0�-�c���soa�-�ACl�d�a9-�aa�►aQa��t ���' ��• ��l.�oA. One or �ore rooss connected to etber, but vhich is or are se arated from all other rooss in the saae building, vhich room constitutes, or rooas constitute, a separate, indep unit vith facilities fQr cooting, sleeps.ug and eating, and used for resi ooms sball be deemed to be a dvellin unit if it occu anc . A room or r contains or they eontain facilities �For cooking, sleeping and esting, if it or thev caa be separat� fro� aiI other roons in tLe same builuing, ii acce�ss �a.. unit, and if 27. Fa�il�r. e� paSSing t�rou any lzving space of anot er � or they are used for residential occupancy- I1n individual or tvo (2) or �ore persons related by blood, �arriage or adoption, i.ncluding foster childrea snd bonafide da�estic servants, r subject to the follaving conditions: � • S. �ore thaa five i5) tmrelated persons living in a dvelling uait shall not constitute a fasily. B. A group 6o�e vhich is a federal taz ezeaPt nonprofit organization shall not consitute a fa�ily if the total persons other than the 12�g� live-in staff or principal oc�upant ezceeds five (5). 205-4 ��• °, i�� 'i� � � ��N �F FR! DLEY ZU : C01�/iMI,tNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M EMO RAN D UM DR_AFT City �i1 Manbers �: �Jock Robertsor�, CaYm�ity Devela�ment Director Lisa Ca�pbel]i;�Gl�lanning Associate L�ATE: JLUie 24, 1988 RD^�RDING : Recycl in9 Program Undate In February 1988 the Council reviewed the City's long range Solid Waste Abatc�nent Pblicy. As per the Cbuncil's reqv�est, the follaving is an update o� cu�rent r�eeds -of ea.ch program activity. 1. S.O.R.T. DroF-Off Redern�tiaaz Oenter Zhi.s oa�o�nent of the City's Solid Waste Abatement progranuning could be expr-jnded to i.r�clude tire recycling. In Minnesota between three and four millio¢� tires are discarcled each year. Landf ills are no longer accepting tires and tt�y canriot be stockpiled in large quantities. TY�e result for the City of FY�idley i.s an increase in t-lie d�ing of tires on vacant propertiea in th�e City. Zt�ao rr�table sites are the vacant lot to the mrttivvest of Burger King at University and Mississippi and the Naegele autdoor site at 5480 - 7th Street N.E. RuLiber Research IIastomerics, Inc., af Babbit, Mim�esota, has been autYwrized by the Minnesota State Waste Managanent Baard to receive and process tires. Rubber Research can arrange to place a trailer at the S.O.R.T. site. Estimated transpar�tatiari and pz�ocessing costs frcm th�e metropol i tan area to Babbit is $650. 00 per one (1) trucklaad of tires. This cost oould be of f set in part by charging residents a small fee for each tire processed. MQre research is needed to determine the amaunt of th�e charge. Also, this service could be lunited to a�ly FYidley residents. ColLmbia Heights receives tires at its drap-off site. It limits this service to residents of Columbia Heights. It is possi.ble that the City of Fridley could enter into sa�ne partnership o� this tire recycling activity.r Staff zeoo�s fvrther research be oa►Zpleted on tire recycl ing bef ore the Council takes acticn oci the provisioal of this service to FYidley re�idents. � g,ecycling pro�am Update, Jtme 24, 1988 2. "FYidav in FY'idley" Cl.�'bsid� Recvcling Pro9ram page 2 Participaticn in the curbsid+e recycling pro9ram has increased 11$ since the begirming of the year~46.89 tons were oollected in May. This is an iricrease of 9.95 tons wer' the 36.94 tons c�ollected in Apri1. 'Ii�ese participation and tonnage levels are the hi�est since Septanber of 1985. Also this increase has occurred steadily aver five months rather than erratically wer one m�th. It is rnt clear, however, that this trend will c�ntinue. B�gi rmi ng Ju1y 1. 1988. P.rY�ka Cburlty wi11 reimburse the City Of FYid1Ey b�.sed on tflons recycled. Zb ir�creaSe Farticipaticm in the City-sponsored program is i�ortant because as p�'ticig3tion goes up, so do tonnages. As tonnages go up, so does the perfornnance bFa.�d subsidy frcm the County. The Metropol itan Cauncil recez�tly has groposed �ndatoiY recYcling for Ar�oka, Ramsey. Dakota, and Scott Counties, because these counties have failed to reach their ,n�;viaual recycling goals. Prv�iding recycling bins b� each of the 7,000 single-family c�vellings in the City wr�uld assure a oo�tis�ued increase in FYidley tonnage and participation r-ates. Most cities in the metropolitan area are prwiding bins to their residents at m wst ar at an assessed cost. Preliminary research has been ccc�leted into the types and costs of recycling bins. Cities included in the research are: Blaine, Coon Rapids, Columbia Heiqhts, Plymouth, Golden Valley, Rc�hbinsdale, and Minneapolis. The City of Plymauth uses the A-1 12 gallca� Blue Box, at a cost of $4.91 per bin. Plynr�uth purchased a total of 15, 000 bins. TYye advantages to the Blue Box are: durability, attractiveness, affordability, and its associatica� with the success of the Plymouth recycling program. Zbnnages in Plyit�ith with th,e introdi.ictiaz of the bins went up frrm 103 tons to 260 tons i.n cube mcmth. 02�ee disadvantage to the Blwe Box, it is smal.l and barely oontains caze (1) week of recyclables. Ply�th distributed the bins at no cost to its residents. The Cities of Golc]en Valley, Coon Rapids, and Minneapolis are or wi11 be using the Rarig stackable crates. Golden Valley uses a two-crate system. One crate is used for glass, one for cans, and a paper bag is used for newspaper. Each crate costs $5.50. One major advantage to the crates is that additica�al crates can be purchased in the event the curbside program exgands to plastic. A disadvantage is they are expensive. Golden Valley expended $93,000 for 16,000 crates. The crates were distributed two crates per lx�usehold to 8,000 hous�.holds. Residents are assessed at an amount of $1.25 per quarter for o�e year to cover part of the cost of the crates. Coon Rapids will distribute �laeir crates at rn cost to their residents. The Cities o� Rdabin.sdale, Blair�e, and Coltgnbia Hei�ts are ar� will be using the Rarig 14 gallcn bin, designed after th+e Blue Box. Or�e advantage to this bin is its slightly larger size may be more useful for Fridley's twice-a-mcnth eollectica�. The average oost of the 14 gallon bin .i�s $5.00. Bla.ir�e and ColLanbia Heights will distribute the bins at an assessed cost to its residents over a 24-month period. Columbia Heights' residents will receive a quarterly bill with a 60 cent assessment for the bins for two years. _ With regard to the type of bin the City of Fridley may wish to purchase, staff reca�s taking a closer look at tlie 14 gallon Rarig bin. Its larger size and affordability are encouraging. It could be used to contain two weeks of glass and cans, and x�ewspapers on top ar at the sicle of the bin. gec,ycling Program Update, Jime 24, 1988 There are several aptior�.s in f inan�cincl the bins : Page 3 1. Solicit Civic and Private Sector donatice�s for the purchase of the bins. �he C'ouncil oould match the funds raised. 2. Purcx�ase and distribute the bins at m cost to the residents. 3. R�rc,i�ase and distribute the bins at an assessed cost to the residents. - 4. Scn►e ccmbinaticn o�f 2 arri 3. The estimated expenditure for bins with 7,000 reside�nts at $5.00 per bin is $35,000. Staff reoannends Council consider the aoquisitior� of bins as a priority for the City's Solid Waste Abatement activities. The bins will benef it the program through increased participation and tonriage levels. Bins also give the City- spar�sored program high visibility and promote a sense of civic respansibility to recycle. Fridley has been a leader in Anoka County in recycling--the first to implenent a oa�rehensive program in Anoka County. A program that does rlot include bins will quickly fall behind. 3. Yard Waste Ctx�osting Site During the last sessi� of the Minnesota State Legislature, the Minnesota waste Managc3nent Act was a�nervded to prohibit yard waste from landf ills in 199�. An�ka County has mt yet cleternuned if yard waste will be prohibited fran the Elk River Refuse Derived �el Plant. Such a prohibitioci is 1 ikely, however. The City of FYidley does have a small grass and leaf campost site at 71st and University. The site, however, oould not accannXx7ate the entire City's yard waste. Ar�ka County has two oa�osting sites at Bunker Hill Regional Park and the other at Rice Creek. This prablem has been easier to solve for cities like Spring Lake Park and ColLanbia Heights with arganized o�llection. The refuse haulers pravide a sep�arate collectics� day far yard waste. The City of Fridley oauld, however, require haulers, as a conditioa� of their licensing, to pick up yard waste. The haulers should also be required to provici�e the City with quarterly reports on the tons of yard waste collected in the City. Tt�ese reports would doc�zt the City's perfo�nance ar level of tons abated far rei�urseqnent by Anoka Countyu to the City. Refuse haulers' licensing occurs in April of ea.ch year. Staf f rnco�ranends that this issu�e be researched more fully befare Cou�cil takes acti�. LC:l s Ni-88-161 , 1R � � M8 M 0 R A N D II M l�8M0 �0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MMTMER � FROM: WII.LIAM C. AUNT, ASSTSTANT TO THE � CITY MAN�GER SUBJECT: ANALY57S OF CA6T TO CITY FOR PART-TII�E SMPLOYEES DATE: JUNE 16, 1988 In response to your request I have undertaken an analysis of the compensation of tempory and part-time employees of the City of Fridley. I have examined both the aggregate figures for 1987 and the two week payroll period Which ended May 20, 1988. With regard to current temporary part-time emplayees, as of May 20, 1988, there were 93 non-authorized employees on the City payroll. Fourty-five �ere Pemale and fourty-eight were male. 1he werall average was �6.43 per hour with the males averaging $5.79 per hour and the females averaging #7.12 per hour. The details are spelled out on the attached Exhibit A. TYie question has been raised as to What the additional cost to the City would be if the City paid pro-rated benefits to all current part-time and temporary employees. This Would be a pro-rating of healt.h and life insurance benefits and annual leave benefits. �is calculation requires a nimmber of asstmmptions. To begin With, since we are Working with aggregate data for a1Z par�time employees in 1987, I am ass�ing that the average temporary employee worked 250 days out of the year, that is, 261 calendar days Monday through Friday less 11 halidays. A second assunption ia #.hat it would require more employees with benefits to perform the sa�e t�s&s as �ployees t�ithout benefits performed. If the average full-time equivalent temporary employee worked 250 days, and if the average leave time benefit was 18 days, the average employee With benefits would only t�ork 232 days out of tiie year. �us, to aecomplish the same amount oP work one Would have to multiply the amount of people by 250 aver 232. A third asswaption is that although tlie average full-time equivaleat� employee �ith benefits only xorks 232 days, that employee is paid for all 261 days. Fourthly, emploqees With benefits Would be included urider our Comparable Worth study. We found that the average increase Por Comparable Worth was about 3.5$ � of the salaries of suthorized emplaqees. �e total regular salaries (exeluding ; overtime) for authorized employees in 1987 was �3,257,031. If you subtract the $1�,067 which Were given in Comparable Worth adjustments the base ealary without Comparable Wortii adjustments Would have been �3,2�2,96�. The annual rate of Comparable Worth adjustments Por 1987 Was $112,536. If tYiis is divided by $3, 242, 964 the resul t is an inerease of 3.u7'� . A flfth ass�mmption is that the average cost to City per employee Por health and liPe insurance premi�mms is about $110 per month. Tbe aixth ass�mmption is that a salary adjustment for 1989 will be about 3-1/2� - A11 the�e assLmmptions are used in the calculations in Exhibit B. Zlie result is that the additional cost to City in 1988 dollars is �147,818.61. Adjusted for 1989 dollars at the rate of 3-1/2$ this would require a mill rate increase of 0.5719. This figure would change slightly once the fiscal disparities ealculations Were worked into it. Given the number of presumpt3ons and variables these figures are only approximate. However, I believe they would be within a few percentage points of actual costs. W CH/ ss 31/24 n ,r . • � E xhibit A � Male CITY OF FRIDLEY Analysis of Sataries of Part-time Employees Payroll period Ending Maq 20, 1988 n � �8 range : $�1.15 to $9.82 per hour average : $5 .79 per hour Femal e Total n = �11 range : ��1.1b to �11 .37 per hour average: $6.82 per hour (If 4 females with employment contracts are added who average �10.10 per hour plus limited benefits the hourly average rate of pay for u5 females = $7.12) n = 93 range : $4 .'15 to �11 .37 per hour average : � .�3 per howr NCH/ss 31/22 0 ,r , ' EBHIBIT B Jime 16, 1988 n ,«MM •, y: �.� � Calculatio� o� a,dditio�al oost to City for giving all part-tim�e anr3 tenq�orazy enplvyees pro-rated benef its P-T 1988 averac�e hoa.trly salaYy 6.43 x 250 working days F-T 1988 averac�e hourly salaiy 6.43 x 261 days paid heal th & 1�'_f e insurance prani.tans 12 m�. @$110 1987 part-time regular pay 198'7 part-time v�rertime pay Zbtal 1987 part-time pay Adjustment for 1988 $$ (x1.035) Productive how° multiplier (x250 days/232 days) Comparabl e Wort:h adj ustment (xl . 035 ) Additional amrnint far full-time salaries (4.40$ of �ibwe) Flus addition�a7. PERA (4 .25$ ) FICA (7 .51$ ) & Workers Cattp. Ins. (2.5�) (= 14.26$ of abvve) Plus add.itiona7. a�mt for health & life insurance (10.26� of $966,92$.46) Additiona7_ Cbst to City in 1988 $$ Additio�a7_ Cost to City in 1989 $$ (+3.5�) 152,992 Mil l rate ir�crE�ase required 267 , 500, 000 = 31123 n _ $ 12, 860 (Base) _ $ 13,426 (Ba.se + 4.40$) _ $ 1,320 (10.26$ of Base) $835,283.05 2,365.09 $837,648.14 $866,965.82 5934,230.40 $966,928.46 $ 42,544.85 6,066.90 99,206.86 $147,818.61 $152,992.26 r 0.5719