The URL can be used to link to this page

01/18/1989 SPEC - 5378� � �� , OUTLINE FOR CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JANIIARY 18. 1989 I. 8istory of Bvents A. B. C. D. E. F. Bossardt/Christenson break-up Ron Christenson assumes responsibility and employee Bob Scarsdon to serve as coordinator. Meetings with Bossardt and Christenson Meetings with Bossardt and Christenson Meetings with Kraus Anderson. , �, . ` � �`�'+ , ; (; .,rL__.t for our job our project separately. together. Final meeting with Virgil Herrick, Jock Robertson, Rick Pribyl, and David Kroos. II. The Thi'ee Choices A. Reassign to Bossardt. B. Reassign to Christenson. C. Reassign to Kraus Anderson III. Research Questions That We Raised A. To what extent do we feel that the work of Bossardt/Christenson has been deficient? B. Do we feel that the newly created company that is headed by Ron Christenson has the capability to successfully guide the completion of our Civic Center project? Are there sufficient staff on board? Do we feel that there is sufficient personal commitment on the part of the individuals invoZved to give our job the attention and professional guidance it needs? C. Is there sufficient doubt about the capabilities of the newly established Christenson firrn to warrant paying the additional costs that would be involved for the services of either Bossardt or Kraus Anderson and Associates? D. To what extent would the conversion from Christenson to Kraus Anderson or Bossardt benefit or detract from the successful completion of our job? Is there any way to calculate or predict cost savings that might be achieved by having Kraus Anderson on the job? On the other hand, is the change of construction managers a move that will create tension and delays among our contractors? . � E. If we do not go with Christenson, can �we expect future problems with his firm? Can we expect them to move their temporary building and equipment out of our construction site quickly? Do we know whether or not construction materials are stored off site? To what extent do we feel that there may be a legal contest? Do we feel that we have a strong position in any legal battles that may ensue. IV. Answer to Ressearch Questions A. Dei3ciencies in the Work of Hossardt/Christenson 1. Lack of conformance in providing comparative bids for each of the contracts that were let. 2. Inability or willingness to provide pay estimates in a timely and accurate manner. 3. Poor management of the bidding process. 4. Lack of familiarity with construction documents. 5. Poor enforcement of submittal and approval processes as stated in the specifications for all contractors. 6. Absence of a construction schedule. 7. Lack of commitment to the project on the part of the BCC management. B. Future capability of the Christenson Firm While the firm probably has sufficient staff to cover our project and the other three projects that they are currently managing, we do nat feel that our project will be well served by continued reliance on the Christenson project management firm. The problems and deficiencies that we have experienced to date would seem to indicate a complicated project future . � ♦ a C. D. E. Cost/Benaiit�trom Chanqe ot Construction Manaqemeat Firms Although the potential additional cost is high (up to $29,000), we do feel that there is sufficient reason to absorb the additional cost by going to another project management firm. Potential Delay nnd Other Problems Although a new project management firm would undoubtedly take some time (2-3 weeks) to become familiar with our project, I believe that in the long run a new firm will actually speed up the project and permit its completion at the earliest possible date. There is really no way to calculate whether or not the switch to project management firms will produce a cost savings. T believe, however, it will be healthy to have a new project management firm examine the contracts and pay-outs as well as provide a highly coordinated process. While a move to a new project management firm may create some tensions among contractors, we believe for the most part, the opposite will be true. Most contractors will welcome the change. Possible Leqa1 Problems It is difficult to say whether or not we will have problems with the Christenson Firm as a result of a decision to move to a new project manager. We have learned that no construction materials are stored off-site. We also believe that there are no records or other materials that could potentially be withheld that would delay our project. As to our legal position, our Attorney, Virgil Herrick, feels very confident that we have a strong legal defense for any actions that may be taken against the City. V. Recommendations A. Staff recommends that the contract be assigned to Corporation and that a cancellation be sent as soon Bossardt and Christenson. 3 project management the Kraus Anderson letter of contract as possible to both � C� ♦ KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY COfVTRACTORS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS William W. Burns Manager of Fridley University Avenue Northeast lev, Minnesota 55432 Fridley Municipal Center Construction Management Kraus-Anderson Construction Company is pleased to submi a construction management proposal to complete the addition and remodeling of the Fridley Municipal Center and the adjoining two-level parking facility that is presently under construction. To meet the needs of our clients, Kraus-Anderson has been very successful in applying construction management techniques on a cooperative team basis for the project construction scheduling, additional value engineering and project completion phase where we work directly with the architect and meeting the owners requirements for completion of his project. This autline proposal is based on the information provided by Boarman and Associates and our meeting with your staff on January 12, 1989 including our walk-thru of the project on January 13, 1989. MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION 525 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, MINNEAPO�IS, MINNESOTA 55404 Equul Opportunity Employer :1 Mr. William W. Burns -2- 1/16/89 Fee Kraus-Anderson (,onstruction Company will provide our complete construction management services for a fee of FORTY-TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($42,500). Our construction management fee will include project accounting, general office procedures and other services necessary to complete the remaining construction of the contract. Not included in the fee are all costs directly assoCiated with the cost of the work which includes Kraus-Andersons full time on-site Project Superintendent salary and the Project Manager salary. We believe the Project Manager will need approximately two hundred fifty hours (250) at Forty Five Dollars ($45) per hour or a maximum cost of ELEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($11,250). Any unused portion of the Project Managers salary shall be returned to the Owner. Team For your project we have chosen the most skilled and qualified team available at Kraus-Anderson. . Project Manager: Thomas J. Sackett On-Site Superintendent: Brian Turnquist Construction Management Services Included in the above fee, Kraus-Anderson will provide all construction management services as described in the services section of our proposal. We would anticipate immediate inter�ction with Boarman and Associates and the City of Fridley staff to initiate a transition period where all contracts, RFP, change orders, field work orders, shop drawings and payment requests would be reviewed by the parties for a complete up-to-date understanding of the project to date. Schedule/FF&E Coordination Kraus-Anderson Construction Company takes pride in its reputation for delivering projects on time. If procurement of materials to date has been done in a proper manner Kraus-Anderson is confident that substantial completion for the entire project could be obtained in ten to twelve weeks. Earlier occupancy would occur at the Fire Station renovation and offices on the main level for the Financing Department. We would provide a comprehensive construction schedule with input from your staff. Included within this schedule would be coordinate�l �%� ow,ners FF&E work of furniture, modular wall systems, sound system and other items being handled by the owner. We understand how to successfully condense schedules and accelerate the construction project to provide the earliest possible occupancy. .� � � Mr. William W. Burns -3- 1/16/89 We are also familiar with the unique phasing characteristics of this type of project. We�will complete the project with little or no disruption in the on-going work functions of the Fridley City staff. We sincerely appreciate your consideration of Kraus-Anderson Construction Company and we are looking forward to the opportunity to being of service to you. Very truly yours, KRAUS-ANDERSON1CONSTRUCTION COMPANY �`homas � . i S ckett Project M n ger TJS:ew Enc].osures � �� 130ARMAN Sr . ASSOCIATES ancNirECTUnc E N G I N E E rt i N G iNiEniOn DESiGr+ Mr. Bill Burns City Manager City of Fridley 6431 Universlty Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota January 16, 1989 Dear Bill, The following letter is in response to your request for an obJective commentary reflerding Bossardt-Christenson's performance and delivery � service. I have outlined the foliowing positive aspects � their performance: 1. Job meetings are held on a weekiy basis. A. Meetings are well organized by Ken Braun. B. Meeting notes are complete. C. Meetings are generaily weil attended by contractors. 2. Our relationship with Ken Braun and Jim Eichman has greatiy (mprc�ed. A. There is a better response to each other's concerns arui issues, B. There is an improved effort to review shop drawings and conform to testing procedures. C. There is a more thorough understanding ofi the documents and the design intent. D. They have exhibited a more concerted effort to be trndved in the probiem soiving process along with the archftect, as unforeseen conditions arise tn the fieid. I would cali attention to the foliowing negatives. ;.�,;�c,,cC� t�S 1�f��;i�5��c � d'��'��C��`'' 1. Poor management of bidding process. ., . A. 4796 of ftems were either not bid, or hacJ to be re-bid because they were ove� budget. B: Information given to the architect and c(ty staff was late in coming resulting in valuable construction ttme was lost. � C. information was incompiete and not.3om�atted for action by the Councp. 2. Lack of familiarity of consiruction documeMs. ... A. Documents were not studied thoroughly by BCC in preparation for the architect's tech�ical review prtor to bidding� �, ; � B.� Documents were still unfamitiar to B�C once construction had started, many ; unnecessary questions were askecl. • ` ;• � . ; ,i . .� 2�� NORTH FIRST STRF�T h11NNF�.�Ul1S. MINP��SGTA 55d01 612-3�9•3?52 �' � 3. Poor enforcement and controi of the submittal and app�oval process as stated in the specifications for all contractors. � , A. Conc�ete pours had started before shop drawings had been approved. B. BCC was not reviswing shop drawings which was part of their �esponsibility. C. In several cases; contractors have ordered materials prior to shop drawing submittais and approvai. • '- D. Lack of conformance to testing procedures. 4. No construction schedule. A. We are 6 months into construction and we stili have no schedule, other than rough key line dates. B: Lack of a schedule negatively effects contractors and coordination w(th other trades. It also adds uncertainty to the schedule of items outside the initial contract, (such as furntture, equipment, and the�telephone system) . it serves to complicate the phased moving effort of staff. 5. Lack of commitment to the project on the pait of BCC management A. Invotvement during construction has been on a very superficiai level. 7here has been very little substantive effort on the part of BCC, other than attending job meetings. 6. BCC has been deficient 1n aggressively negotfating the best change order prices for ihe client. .. � As we look to compiete the project in the up-coming months. I wouid hope the tollowing wau{d be understood and accepted. 1. !t is extremely important that all of the players within the construction management organization understand that they are on the same team with the architect. mutually pursuing the best interests of the client. 2. The management level must be committed to the project to assure that the process wili be implemented. A. Issue a complete schedule immediately. B. Tho��aughly review all shop drawings and ailow the architect a reasonable amount of ' time io do the same. ' C. Aggressively negotiate the best possible prices for the client on change order items and in a timeiy manner. ' D.�. Get better controi of the contractors and insist they conform to the construction process anci schedule. � • ; I am hopeful that this response to your �equest is�t�etpful in your negotiations with Sossardt- Christenson. ' �• Sincer . ' „ . , . ' . • , �� _ . David Kroos , . � � - : � Project Manager . � ` � � � . ;. Boarman 8 Associates • . • . ' CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMO�RANDUM � TO: BILL BIIRNS� CITY MANA(3ER FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PROBLEMB ASSOCIATED WITH BOSSARDT CHRISTENBON PAY APPLICATION PROCE88 DATE: JANUARY 17, 1989 My most immediate concern with the current pay application process is that we still do not have any of the comparative bids for each contract that was let for the construction. We have notified the construction manager that we need these documents before our auditors arrive, and as of today, we have received n�one. We have been spending a considerable amount of time reviewing and correcting the information that has come from the construction manager. We asked that a11 payments to contractors be made monthly, and set timetables for submission of pay information from the construction manager. �ach pay estimate has been submitted to us late causing us to rush through the information to present it to our council. Below is a summary of the errors we are finding on the pay applications: 1. Rounding errors (usually $1.00) 2. Contractor pay application does not agree with the construction managers pay request 3. Not showing a retainage on the pay application 4. General expenses did not agree to invoice summary The construction manager also attempted to have us pay the general expenses direct instead of reimbursing the construction manager for them. It also appears, for whatever reason, the checks to the contractors are being held for some reason. I have been getting calls from contractors asking me for their money from old pay requests. � 0 � � b. N V ', Virgil C. Herrick David P. Newman )ames D. Hoeft , Gregg V. Herrick �� o ATTORNEYS AT LAW January 18, 1989 Ronald A. Christenson Bossardt Christenson Corporation 33 South Sixth Street 2910 Multifoods Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Christenson: I am writing this letter as the Fridley City Attorney. Please consider this a letter of termination pursuant to Article 10 of the Bossardt Christenson contract with the City of Fridley. It is the City's position that the Bossardt Christenson Corporation has failed to substantially perform in accordance with the terms of its contract. In addition, the City takes the position that the Bossardt Christenson Corporation has violated Article 12 of the contract by assigning or trans€erring its interest in the City of Fridley contract to a successor company headed by yourself. Article 12 states that neither party to the agreement will assign or transfer its interest without the consent of the other party. This consent was never sought or obtained. The City also takes the position that the Bossardt Christenson Corporation has violated the terms of Exhibit A of the contract by changing the onsite management without the approval of the City. Pursuant to Article 10 of said contract, the City of Fridley will consider this contract terminated seven (7) days after delivery of this notification to your office. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me. VCH:JJH Sincerely, Virgil C. Herrick Suite 205, �i401 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Ntinnesota 55432, 612-571-3850 i� � - � 6.2 Trade discounts, rebates and refunds, and returns from sale of surplus materials and equipment shall accrue to the Owner, and the Construction Manager shall make prorisions so that they can be secured. AR71ClE 7 PAYMENTS TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 7.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT Of BASIC SERVICES 7.1.1 An initial payment as set forth in Paragraph 15.1 is the minimum payment under this Agreement. 7.1.2 Subsequent payments for Basic Services shall be made monthly and shall be in proportion to services per- formed within each Phase of Services, on the basis set forth in Article 15. 7.1.3 If and to the extent that the time initially estab- liched for the Construction Phase of the Project is ex- ceeded or extended through no fault of the Construction Manager, compensation for Basic Services required for such extended period of Administration of the Construc- tion Contract shaN be computed as set forth in Paragraph 15.3 for Additional Sen�ices. 7.1.4 When compensation is based on a percentage of the total of the Contract Sums of all the separate Con- tracts, and any portions of the Project are deleted or othen�•ise not constructed, compensation for such por- tions of the Project shall be payable to the extent sen�ices are performed on such portions, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Subparagraph �5.2.1, based on (1) the lo��•est figures from bona fide Bids or negotiated proposals, or (21 i( no cuch Bids or proposals are received, the most recent estimate of the total of the Contract Sums of all the separate Contracts for such portions of the Project. 7,2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND REIMBURSABLE CO5T5 7.2.1 Payments on account of the Construction Man- ager's Additional Services, as defined in Paragraph 1.3, and for Reimbursable Costs, as defined in Article l6, shall be made monthly upon presentation of the Construction Mana�er's statement of services rendered or costs in- curred. 7,3 PAYMENTS WITHHELD 7.3.1 No deductions shall be made from the Construc- tion Manager's compensation on account of penalty, liq- uidated damages or other sums withheld from pa}�ments to Contracrors, or on account of the cost of changes in �1�ork other than those for which the Construction Man- ager is held legally liable. 7,4 PROJECT SUSPENSION OR ABANDONMENT 7.4.1 If the Project is suspended or abandoned in whole or in part for more than three months, the Construction Manager shall be compensated for all services performed prior to receipt of �vritten notice from the Owner of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Costs then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 10.4. If the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three months, the Construction Manager's compensation shall be equitably adjusted. 7.4.2 If construction of the Project has started and is stopped by reason of circumstances not the fault of the Construction Manager, the Owner shall reimburse the Construction Manager for the costs of the Construction Manager's Project-site statt as provided for by this Agree- ment. The Construction Manager shall reduce the size of the Project-site staff after 30 days' delay, or sooner if feasible, for the remainder of the delay period as directed_ by the Owner and, during that period, the Owner shall reimburse the Construction Manager for the costs of such staff prior to reduction plus any relocation o� employ- ment termination costs. Up�n the termination of the stop- page, the Construction Manager shalt provide the neces- sary Project-site staff as soon as practicable. , ARTICLE 8 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 8.1 Records of Reimbursable Costs and costs pertaining to services performed on the basis of a Multiple of Direct Personnel Expense shall be kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and shall be available to the Owner or the Owner's authorized representative at mutu�lly convenient times. ARTICLE 9 ARBITRATION 9.1 All claims, disputes and other matters in question bet�veen the parties to thrs Agreement arising out oF or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construc- tion Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. IVo arbrtration aris+ng out of or relating to this Agreement shall include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional person not a party to this Agreement except by written consent containing a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by the Consiruction Manager, ihe Owner, and any other person sought to be joined. Any consent to arbitration involving an additional person or persons shall not constitute con- sent to arbitration of any dispute not described therein or with any person not named or described therein. This agreement to arbitraie and any agreemeni to arbiirale �vith an additional person or persons duly consented to by the parties to this Agreement shall be specifically en- forceable under the prevailing arbitration law. 9.2 Notice of demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association, and a copy shall also be filed ��-ith the Architect. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after ihe date when insti- tution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 9.3 The a�vard rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. ARTICLE 10 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 This ARreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice should the other party- AIA DOCUMENT aQ01 • O\'1TER•CO!�STRUCTION MAVAGER AGREEMENT • IUNE 1980 EDITION • AIA� e01980 • THE AMERIC�N INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YnRK AVE., N.�V.. \�'ASHINGTON. D.0 20006 6801-1980 G 1E � d fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms throu�h no fauit of the party initiating the termination. 10.2 This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner upon at least fourteen days' written notice to the Con- struction Manager in the e.•ent that the Project is perma- nently abandoned. 10.3 In the event of term;nation not the fault of the Construction Manager, the Construction Manager shall be compensated for all services performed to the termina- tion date together with Reimbursable Costs then due and all Termination Expenses. 10.4 ie�mination Expenses are de(ined as Reimbursable Costs directly attributable to termination for which ihe Construction Manager is not otherwise compensated. ARTICLE 11 MISCEIlANE0U5 PROVISIONS 11.1 Unless otherN�ise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the la�+� in eHect at the location of the ProjecL 11.2 Terms in this Agreement shalt ha�•e the same mean- ing as those in the 1980 Edition of AIA Document A201/ CM, Genera! Conditions of the Contract for Construction, Construction Management Edition. 11.3 As between the parties to this Agreement: as to all acts or failures to act by either party to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run, and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued, in any and all events not later than the relevant Date of Substantial Completion of the Project. and as to any acts or failures to act occurring after the relevant Date of Substantial Completion of the Project, not later than the date of issuance of the final Project Certificate for Payment. 11.4 The OH•ner and the Construct;on Manager waive all rights against each other, and against the contractors, consultants, agents and employees of the other, for dam- ages covered by any propert�• insurance during construc- tion, as set forth in the 1980 Edition of AIA Document A201/CM, General Conditions of the Contract for Con- struction, Construction hlanagement Edition. The Owner and the Construction Manager shall each require appro- priate similar wai��ers from their contractors, consultants and agents. ARTICLE 12 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS i2.1 The Owner and the Construction htanager, respec- tivel��, bind themseh•es, their partners, successorc, assiFns and leg�l representati��es to the other part�� to this Agree- ment, and to the partners, successors, assisns and legal representatives of such other party �+•ith respect to aN covenants of this Agreement. Neither the O��ner nor the Const�uction hlanager shall assign, sublet or transfer an� interest in this Agreement �•ithout the �+•ritten concent of the other. " ARTlCLE 13 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement betH-een the Oa�ner and the Construction hlanager and supersedes all prior negotiationc, represen- tatiorn or agreements, either written or oral. This Agree- ment ma�• be amended only b�• �vritten instrument signed by both the O�+•ner and the Construction Manager. 13.2 hothing contained herein shall be deemed to cre- ate any contractual relationship beh+�een the Construction �1anager and the Architect or any of the Contractors, Sub- contractors or material suppliers on the Project; nor shall am�thing contained in this Agreement be deemed to gi��e an�• third party any claim or rigl�t of action against the O�vner or the Construction Manager �vhich does not other��i�e exist �ti•ithout regard !o this Agreement. ARTICLE 14 INSURANCE 14.1 The Construction Manager shall purcha>e and maintain insurance for protection from claims under �vorkers' or workmen's compensation acts; c(aims for dama�es betause of bodily injury, including personal in- jur�•, sickness, disease or death of any of the Constructio� Manac;er's employees or of any person; �xk7�7[lc�9Q xbnx�tec�ckacowaxa�axio�xxxxx�€ac�dx9cxx�wa�cxx�exes,�eae ,��x�xi�z��ti�c#�xx�tx�rcxx�i��t�xkx�cx� �FiCi�i:�i?4�FX�Fd�,�?5��E�rK,�4�4�Fd��E�GT',xi�i�4�4� �mmcacxnc�cosnc�c¢ic��c�axac�ax�cxaclroa�cncfaldaxm��cm� �kx�i�x�tR�t�B��x�i��' � 14.� The Owner shall purchase and maintain Builder's Risk Insurance until substantial completion ready for Deneficial:occupancy. AIA DOCUMENT t101 • OWNER•CONSIRUCTION MANAGER AGREEMENT • �UNE 1980 EDITIOk • AIAf % B8O'I —'I�ISO �1980 • iHE AMERIC:'�n �NSTITUTE OF ARCM�TECTS, 1735 NEN' YORK AVE., N.W., N'ASHInGTO�, D.C. T00(16 �.;:�:. �� w � � -�. , BXBIHIT 'A" ' Compensation for Construction Management Services providec3 during the Pre-Conetruction Phase and Constuction Phase of the Project would be provided at a fee of Seventy-Eight Thousand � Dollars ($78,000.00). This fee, combined with any reimburaable costs such as those listed below.in the Reimbursable Expenses section, vould be invoiced monthly as indicated, and Would be due thirty (30) days thereafter. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Compensation for reimbursable expenses is in addition to the basic fee. A detailed budget of all reimbursable expenses has been prepared by the Construction Manager for the Owner's review and approval prior to the start of construction. Reimbursable expenses may include: On-Site Management: Cost of management personnel assigned to the on-site office, which may include but is not limited to the construction Superintendent. Such personnel may be assigned and become reimbursable prior to the �actual start of construction. Cost of on-site personnel shall be reimbursed at Direct Personnel Expense. (Direct Personnel Expense includes cost of salaries and of mandatory and customary benefits, such as statutory employees benefits, insurance, pensions and similar benefits, and will be computed at 1.3 times the salary of the employee or 1.4 times the wages of union employees). The personnel required for on-site management shall be determined by the Construction Manager and approved by the Owner. On-Site Office: Cost of trailer, trailer sanitation, utilities, mileage/vehiclea, telephone, secretarial and office equipment, postage and supp�ies. � 11 � u -CONDITIONS FOR PAYMENT � The lump sum fee for the project vould be unaffected by variations betWeen the eatimate and the bid8 or by change orders during , the Conatruction Phase unleas the Owner initiates an increase in scope. In that event, a 3� fee vould be applied to the additional conatruction cost caused by the increase in scope. The lump aum fee would then be distributed to the Construction Manager in ten (10) equal monthly payments based on`the anticipatec3 Pre-Construction and Construction schedule. Fee distribution will commence April l, 1988, and will end 10 months thereafter. END OF BY9IBIT 'A" 1J - Z C :��,RE?iODEL � CI VCOHT +" �DOR C�NTkACTOR CONTRACT DATE CHECK REOUEST _NI�l;BEk A?lOUNT ESTI1lATES APPROVED NU1lBER • 1- ------------- ------------------------- --------------------------------------------- CIVIC CEMTER REMODELING CONTRACTS � �A00004 A. E. COHRAD 7241 Ext. Insullation b Fin. Sys ARCHITECTURAL SALES 9510 . Acoustical Ceilings BL00liBERG INC. 6400 Architectural Moodrork B00122 BOSSARDT CHRISTENSON CORP. 1000 General Expense 800137 BRIN NORTHWESTERH GLASS 8385 Safety Glass 8 Gl�zing 8410 Aluminum Entraces 8800 Glass 8 Glazing 8900 Glezed Curteinrall 8800 C00169 CURRAN V. HIELSEN COKPANY 7530 Boofing 7600 Fleshing b Sheeteetal 7530 DIVISION 7 7950 Rarp Expansion Joint 58, 900. 00 9-19-88 3,240.00 12-19-88 2l009 APP. �3 ---------------------------- 58, 900. 00 3, 240. 00 28, 800. 00 5-22-88 ---------------------------- 28 � 800. 00 0. 00 86� 6?2. 00 8-22-88 t 6, 00@. 00 ) ADJ. ---------------------------- 80� 692. 00 0. 00 175, 323. 00 8-22-88 233.@4 4-28-88 76.83 5-26-88 31.33 6-16-88 361.66 7-28-88 341.53 8-25-88 1� 375. 98 9-22-88 25� 753. 00 11-7-88 9� 082. 00 11-IS-88 15, 893. 00 12-19-88 ---------------------------- 175, 323. 00 43, 048. 37 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 95, 675. 00 8-22-88 1.800.00 12-19-88 ---------------------------- 95, 675. 00 1, 880. 00 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 133�975.00 8-22-88 12, 330. 00 11-7-88 ( 3, 000. 00 ) ADJ. 61.1�0.00 1i-15-88 ---------------------------- 130.975.00 73.440.0@ 9. 20@. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 9. 200. 00 0. 00 20049 20475 20968 21690 22149 22510 23381 APP. #1 23492 APP. �2 24028 APP. 43 24030 APP. �3 23383 APP. �1 235@6 APP. �2 � C:�REMODEL\CIYCOHT V&�UOk COHTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE CHECx REOUEST ` NUi�BER A�OUNT ESTIMATES APPROVED NUMBER # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. . � � � � ` � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ` � � R.� E00054 ENVIROHET INC. 1700 Asbestos Re�oval E00053 �HVIROH-COH,�INC. 1580 • HVAG G00004 GAtI!(ON BROS. 2110 Site Clearing b Earthrork 2200 G00044 GEPHART ELECTRIC 1600 Electrical GLEWKE DQORS, IHC $110 Stee2 Doors b Frames G00@80 GRANQTE IROH 5100 Structural ?letal Fra�ing 5210 SteEl Joists 53�0 Steel Roof Decking GRAZZIHI BROS. 93@0 Tile work 9730 Elastomeric Liq. Floor GUILLAU!(E � ASSOC. 9900 Peinting b Wallcovering J0@041 JESCO, IHC. 14, 234. 00 629.0@ 21-15-88 235�4 APP. t3 �1,461.00 12-29-68 2484? APP. •2 14, 234. 00 12, 090. 00 218, 374. 00 16,028.00 11-15-88 23513 APP. •2 55.763.00 12-19-88 24046 APP. #3 ---------------------------- 218, 374. 00 71, 791. 00 4?� 325. @0 8-22-88 26,100.00 11-7-88 23384 APP. �1 ---------------------------- 47, 325. 00 26, 100. 00 272, 330. 00 8-22-88 8, 750. 00 11-7-88 18.765.00 i1-15-88 20,250.00 12-19-88 ---------------------------- 272, 330. 00 47, 765. 00 48. 744. 00 8-22-88 505. 08 ADJ. ---------------------------- 49, 249. 00 0. 00 53, 950. 08 8-22-88 3, 298. 00 i l-7-88 23385 APP. 41 23524 APP. #�2 24051 APP. �3 2338b APP. �1 t 800. 00 ) ADJ. 21,103.00 12-19-88 24053 APP. �3 ---------------------------- 53� I50. 00 24, 393. @@ 38, 860. 00 8-22-88 1 � 310. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- �0,1?0. 00 0. 00 39. 950. 00 8-22-68 ---------------------------- 39, 950. 00 0. 00 C:\FEMODEL\CIYCONT V�K�AR �QATRA�TQR GQNTRACT DATE CHECK REOUEST �• 1�i1MB�R AMOUHT ESTIHATES APPROVED HU�BER � ------------------------------------------------------------------------.--------------------- 4@00 Unit llaeonry 375,822.00 8-22-88 4230 Reinforced Masonry 2,700.00 i1-7-88 23387 APP. �1 � 4400 Stonerork 19,350.00 i1-15-86 23535 APP. �2 20,250.00 12-19-88 24061 APP. #3 � ---------------------------- 375, 822. 00 42, 300. 00 *+*+ KKH ERECTION Steel Erection K80036 KLAltii lfECtiANICAL CORTRACTORS 1530 Plumbing/Piping/Temp Control K00040 KRANZ COHSTRUCTION 2072 De�olition K0004I KRE![ER b DAVIS, IHC. 7115 Sheet Materproofing MASTER ASPHALT 2513 Asphalt Concrete Paving 1100236 KINNESOTA ELEVATOR 14240 Hydraulic Elevators M00243 KIHNETOKKA IRON Misc Metals Labor i Neteria M80264 !lOLiNE CONCRETE PRODUCTS C0. 3410 Precast Concrete 33, 400. 00 9-19-88 ( 21, 637. 00 ) ADJ. i l, 763. 00 0. 00 270, 760. 00 8-22-88 ( Z5, 090. 00 ) AIIJ. 33, 094. 00 11-15-88 38, 949. 00 12-19-88 ---------------------------- 245, 670. 00 72, 043. 00 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 23540 APP. �2 24064 APP. �3 136.480.80 8-22-88 54,060.00 i1-7-88 23388 APP. �1 41,624.00 i1-15-88 23541 APP. �2 ---------------------------- 136, 480. 00 95, 684. 00 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 8, 725. 00 8-22-88 ( 2� 880. 00 ) ADJ. 1.170.00 11-15-88 23542 APP. �2 ---------------------------- 5, 845. 00 1, 170. 00 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 20, 000. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 20� 000. @0 0. 00 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 27, 451. 00 8-22-$8 720.00 1i-7-88 23389 APP. �1 ---------------------------- 27, 451. 00 720. 00 36, 0@0. 00 . 9-29-88 l 5, 894. 00 ) ADJ ' 9�8.00 12-I9-88 24079 APP. �3 ---------------------------- 30, 106. 00 918. 00 17, 650. 00 8-22-88 �C:�RbNODEL\CIVCONT V&NVGk C�NTRACTOR CQHTRAC? DATE CHECK REOUEST ` HUMBER AliOUHT ESTIMATES APPROVED HUIlBER � t 2. 000. 00 ) ADJ 12.141.00 12-19-88 24080 APP: #3 =====15,650-00====12,141_00_ _ I lI00270 lIULCAHY DRYMALL 5400 Cold Formed lletal Frawing 162,885.00 9-19-88 � 14,175.00 i1-15-88 23556 APp. #2 . 7,771.00 12-19-88 24081 APP. �3 . 162, B85. 00 21, 946. 00 NARDINI FIRE EGUIP![EKT 1052 Fire ExtinguisAers b Access 1,044.00 8-22-88 1, 044. 00 0. 00 N00042 HATIONAL AUTO![ATIC SPRINKLER 1555 Fire Protection 36, 974. 00 8-22-88 l 3. 00 ) ADJ 2.243.00 ii-15-88 15, 184.00 12-19-88 ---------------------------- 36, 971. 00 17, 427. 00 NYSTROK, INC 1020 Louvers b Vents - 527.00 8-22-88 1050 ?letal Lockers 13,104.00 8-22-88 13� 631. 00 0. 00 3000 PARK CONSTRUCTION �2514,310 Concrete Paving/Fora�vork 597.709.00 8-22-88 3210.3215 Concrete Reinforcement 3300, 3365 PHIL HUTCHIHSOH CO![PANY 1880 Toilet Accesories PIKK COKPANIES 9650 Resilient Flooring 9680 Carpetinq RZGHT-MAY CAULKIKG 7980 Joint Seelers 2356� APP. �2 24085 APP. #3 t 709. 00 ) ADJ 131.659.00 11-15-88 23569 APP. #2 106,696.00 12-19-88 24091 APP. 43 ---------------------------- 547, 000. 00 238, 355. 00 4. 389. 00 8- 22- 88 ---------------------------- 4. 389. 00 0. 00 74, 208. 00 8-22-88 74, 208. 00 0. 00 2.190. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 2,190. 00 0. 00 I I C:\��KODEL\CIVCONT V�KUGA GpKThAGTGR CONTRACT DATE CHECK RBOUEST � KUMBfiR AMOUNT ESTIMATES APPROVED HUHBER � --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- R00066 ROANOKE BUILDIHG COHPANY 5100 Rouph Carpentry b5,721.00 8-22-88 SEAL •T,REAT 7980 : Joint Sealers SICO, INC. 1145 Wall Beds SPANCRETE lIIDWEST C0. 3450 Arch. Precast Concrete SUPERIOR ACCESS COHTROLS 8330 Overhead Coiling Doors 9340 Overhead Coiling Grilles 8360 Overhead Doors T. S. HOWARD /SANY KETAL 10160 Toilet Partions UHIVERSAL SUPPLY COKPANY 8211 Flush Mood Doors M. L. HALL COlIPAHY 8250 Door Opening Assenbly 18650 Operable Partitions 7880 �Skylight syste�e B00122 $OSSARDT CHRISTENSON Contingency � 8, 469. 00 ) ADJ 11, 591. 80 1i-15-88 1,781.00 ADJ 2 4, 085. 00 12-19-88 ---------------------------- 59, 033. 00 15, 596. 00 9� 300. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 9� 300. 00 0. 00 12.710. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 12, 710. 00 0. 00 , ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 28, 230. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 28� 230. 00 0. 00 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 13, 140. 00 8-22-88 1, 779. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 14, 919. 00 0. 00 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- 2. 987. 00 8-22-88 ---------------------------- 2.98�.00 0.00 18, 500. 00 8-22-88 4� 322. 00 ADJ ---------------------------- ?2� 822. 00 0. 00 1. 896. 00 8-22-88 21, 774. 00 8-22-88 28. 563. 00 ---------------------------- 52.233.00 0.00 60, 000. i80 40,170. 00 ADJ il,?81.00) ADJ 2 96.369.00 0.00 23576 APP. �2 24099 APP. �3 C:\�EhOpEL�CIVCONT y, V�N�uR CQNTRAGTQR COATRACT DATE CHECK BfiOUEST KUMBfiR AMOU�T ESTIHATES APPROVED AUMBER � --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -====-=======-----=====-==-= TOTAL CONTRACTS 'f0 DATE 3, 326. 070. 00 - TOTAL CHAiIGE ORDERS TO DATE ESTIKATES PAID TO DATE l�ISC �PURCKASES TOTAL BUDGET B00122 BOSSARDT CHRISTEKSON CORP. Conetruction Mgwt. Fee 821, 967. 39 ---------------------------- 3, 326, 070. 00 821, 967. 37 ==-===-=-===========-==-==== 93, 100. 00 ---------------------------- 3, 419, 170. 00 821, 967. 37 ---------------------------- BUDGET � KG![T FEE CONTINGENCY -CONTRACT SAVINGS 78, 000. 00 8-22-88 15, 600. 00 4-28-88 ?, 800. 00 5-26-88 7.800.00 6-16-88 7, 800. 00 7-28-88 7.800.00 8-25-88 7. 800. � �-22-88 ---------------------------- 78, 000. 00 54, 600. 00 3, 404, 070. 00 876, 567. 37 40. 170. 00 3, 363, 900. 00 � 20@49 ?!AR - APR 20475 IlAY 20968 JUHE 21690 JULY 22149 AUG 22510 SEPT