09/11/1989 - 5327�
unro�
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING
F�a ATTENDENCE SHEET
MONDAY September 11 , 1989
7:30 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
ITEM
PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER
<
r�
.,
EBISTING
55. Parkinq Stall.
A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1)
automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and
permits ingress and egress of an automobile. Where a parking stall
abuts a curb or sidewalk the length may be reduced to eighteen (18 )
feet.
PROPOSED
55. Parkinq stall.
A ten (10 ) foot wide by twenty ( 2 0) f oot long area to store
one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or
alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile.
Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk the length
may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet.
Alternate
A nine (9) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store
one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or
alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile and
which is double striped in accordance with the design on
file in the office of the City Engineer. Where a parking
stall abuts a curb or sidewalk the length may be reduced
to eighteen (18) feet.
COMMENT
It would seem logical to also clarify the language of the
sidewalk/curb overhang.
It would also seem logical to prohibit the NINE foot stall in areas
of grocery and similar stores.
23
-�7
,
i G �' � • � �
�—.�.. _�M�N i� 7. s ' �`
M �ti� � � ; M ��,. (
�
IY; r N� m v, n� 4�� S' !? � P
23A
:{
i
�
f
�
,fi;
:r"`�i ..
'? �;;.;
'.;�•;<�:r
': 5
CITY COIINCIL l[E$TING, 88PTF�iBBR il, 1989
pQBLIC IIEARING �COI�iTINUED):
Consideration of Public Hearing on
Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer
Improvement Project No. 183. (83rd)
��.
��
. . . . . . . 2 - 2 B
Consideration of Public Hearing on
Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer
Improvement Project No. 188. (Northco).
�
P
'. . . 3 - 3 B
Consideration of Public Hearin on 1�
9 �
Street Improvement Project No. Street
1988 - 1& 2(Parts A, B, & C). (Northco) .... 4- 4 H
-s A �-�'� ` ���:�
OLD HOSINE$8:
Consideration of Second Reading of
an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley
City Code, Chapter 104, Entitled
"Tree Disease" by Renaming Chapter
to "Diseased Trees" and by Amending
Sections 104.02, 104.04, 104.06,
104 08 d 104 09
� ��P'
��
�
. an . . . . . . . . . . . .
�
. . . . 5 - 5 B
PAGE 2
CITY COIINCIL KEBTING, BBPT$KBER 11, 1989
NEW BIISINESS:
Consideration of First Reading of an
Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City
Code, Chapter 602, entitled "Beer
Licensing" by Amending Section 602.09.1,
Licenses Required . . . . . . . . . . . .
�.
Consideration of First Reading of an
Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley
City Code, Chapter 603, Entitled
"Intoxicating Liquor" by Amending
Section 603.11.1, Hours of Operation.
�
��;
�
. . . . 6 - 6 A
�� !J
�
�
. . . . . . 7
Consideration of First Reading of an
` Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City p,
Code, Chapter 605, Entitled "Intoxicating,��,d`�
Liquor--Clubs" by Amending Section
605.13.1, 605.13.2, Restrictions. . . . . . . . . 8
Consideration of First Reading of an
Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley
City Code, Chapter 606, Entitled
"Intoxicating Liquors, Congressionally
Chartered Veterans' Organizations" by
Amending Section,606.11.1, Hours of
Operation . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .
e�''�,� �
T✓" `�
i�"
. . . . . 9
PAGE 3
CITY COIINCIL MEETING, 8$PTEMBER 11, 1989
NEW BIISINESB (CONTINQED):
Consideration of Resolution Confirming
Assessment for 1989 Service Connections ..
� w,
Consideration of Resolution Confirming
Assessment for Water, Sanitary Sewer &
Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 183.
(83rd) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�
�� /
/ �
Consideration of Resolution Confirming
Assessment for Water, Sanitary Sewer &
Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 188.
( Northco ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� �
� 'n /,
� �.
PAGE 4
�" U
.' . . 10 - 10 B
�� U
�
. . . 11 - il B
�
�
� - 12 B
. . . 12
Consideration of Resolution Confirming n� �
Assessment for Street Improvement Project _y',,��
No. Street 1988 - 1& 2(Parts A, B, & C). ��
(Northco & Moore Lake Commons). . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13 G
�
, �
✓
CITY CODNCIL 1�IgETING, 8$PTSMBER 11, 1989
NEW BIISINE88 CONTINII$D:
Consideration of Receiving the Minutes
of the Planning Commission Meeting of
August 30, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. Ztems from the Appeals Commission
meeting minutes of August 22, 1989
PAGE 5
. . 14 - 14 FF
�
�
A-1. Consideration of a variance,
VAR #89-16, to reduce the
front yard setback from 35
feet to 30 feet to allow
the construction of a new
home on Lot 10, Block 2,
Riverwood Park, the same
being 7110 Riverwood
Drive N.E., by Kenneth A.
Tigue....... ...........14L-14FF
/
�
�
Consideration of Entering into an �
�
Agreement with Bruce A. Leisch to
Conduct a Water Source Study. . . . . . . . . . . 15
/
✓�
Consideration of Entering into an �
Agreement with HNTB to Design a
1 MG Elevated Water Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . 16
CITY COIINCIL KBSTING� 68PT$Z�i88R il� 1989 PAGE 6
NEW BIISINS86 CONTZNQED:
Consideration of Change Order No. 12 �
to Fridley Municipal Center Improvement
Project No. 189 . . . . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . 17 - 17 D
� ` �w �
�
Consideration of Receiving Bids and �
Award Contract for Storm Sewer Pipe
Repair Project No. 194 (�nnett Drive). ..... 18 - 18 A
Appointment:
1
. . . . . . . . . 19
Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21 H
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Adj ourn :
•
GREATER ANOKA COUNTY
HUMANE SOCIETY MONTH
September 1989
William J. Nee
Mayor
Fridley. MN
WHEREAS, the Greater Anoka County Humane Society was established 10 ytars ago using
volunteers' homes to provide shelter to a small number of stray animals; and,
WHEREAS, two years ago the Humane Sociery built a shelter to meet the growing needs for their
services; and,
WHEREAS, now, the Humane Society. uliliZing a network of over 100 volunteers, cares for an average oj
1 SO animals per day with over SO percent per r►ronth being adopted out to new homes: and,
WHEREAS, as the demand for services continues to grow, the shclter n�eds to build additiona/ holding
pe»s and exercise areas for the animals; and,
WHEREAS, it is a primary goal of the Humane Sociery to increase public awareness in the schools and
the communiry to the importance of proper care for animals; and,
WHEREAS, in an e,Q'ort to raise funds for the br�ilding additions and the pxblic outrcach, the Humane
Society is hosting a SK Walk/Ru»/Roll for Homeless Animals on Saturday, Stptember 23, 1989 at
Bunker Hills Regional Park; and,
WHEREAS, the Ciry ojFridlry supports the Humant Sociery's goals and fund-raising e,,�`'orts because they
will result in better care for animals:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 1 William J. Na, Mayvr of Fridley do hereby proclaim the
month ojSeptember as:
GREATER ANOKA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY MONTH
and encourage increased public awarentss ojtht services provided by the »on profit organization:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Fridley citiZtns a'e �ncoura8�d to Part1ciPate in the SK Walk/Run/Roll
for Homeless Aninwls or to eontribute pledges to help the Humane Society provide the proper care for
abandoned and stray animals in MolFa County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1/�ave set my hand and
aiustd the seal of the City of Firidley to b� affixed this
11 th day of S�ptanber.
WIII.IAM J. NEE, MAYOR
THE MINUTES OF THE REGOLAR MEETING OF TS$ FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF
AIIGIIST 28, 1989
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:38 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings, Councilman
Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and
Councilwoman Jorgenson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 14. 1989:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
MoTION by Councilman Billings to amend the agenda by adding the
following item after Item 1: Consideration of a Variance Request,
VAR #89-12, to Increase the Required Maximum Lot Coverage from 40�
to 47$ to Allow the Construction of Additional Warehouse/
Manufacturing and Office Space on Lot 7, Block 2, East Ranch
Estates Second Addition, the same being 7855 Rancher's Road N.E.,
by Cortron Corporation. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to delete Item 2B, Comprehensive Plan
Revision, from the agenda and reverse the order of Items 4 and �.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
�RIDLEY CITY CODI�TCIL 1�IEETING OF ��GDST 28. 1989 P�GE 2
WAYNE JOHNSON 11610 53RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH - RE: VACATED
ALLEY:
Mr. Johnson stated he is here this evening to request the Council's
participation in the cost to memorialize the title for the alley
which the City vacated. He stated he thought it was aqreed upon
by staff that the City would pay half of this cost.
Mr. Johnson stated the City may have erred in not constructing the
alley back in the 1960's. He stated because this was not done,
property owners installed their driveways in the front and some
owners do not have a need for part of the vacated alley.
Mayor Nee stated there is a similar situation where the City
purchased land for construction of a street to North Park School
and an adjacent property owner bought some of this excess land
which the City did not use. He stated about a month ago, the
property owner applied for a building penait and found there were
problems with the title. He stated this is the same as Mr.
Johnson's situation, except this other property owner paid for the
property, and Mr. Johnson did not. Mayor Nee stated the City
Attorney has stated the City should not pay for a clear title as
the property was purchased under a quit claim deed, and he felt
this was a similar situation.
Mr. Johnson stated right now the City has an alley that looks very
bad and he is trying to improve it. He stated he felt he was doing
the City a service in trying to make improvements.
Mayor Nee advised Mr. Johnson that he has the land and can do
anything he wants with it. He felt it is no longer the City's
responsibility, but Mr. Johnson's if he wants to clear the title.
Councilman Billinqs stated Mr. Johnson is saying he does not feel
he should pay all the court costs to clear the title on the east
six feet of the alley as all his neiqhbors will obtain part of this
alley and they should bear some of the cost. Councilman Billings
stated Mr. Johnson also points out if the City had paved the alley
back in the 1960's, property owners would have installed driveways
to the alley. He stated, as it now stands, some owners have
driveways to the front and not everyone wants the alley paved so
Mr. Johnson initiated the vacation process. Councilman Billings
stated he can sympathize with Mr. Johnson, but he has a difficult
time with the City paying half the legal costs as he felt it was
not in the best interests of the City.
Councilman Billings felt an alternative may be for the City to pay
the cost to clear the title and then sell the property to owners
who want the east six feet of the alley. Councilman Billinqs asked
how many property owners or �ots would be involved.
FRIDLBY CITY CODNCIL I�EBTZNQ OF �OGIIST Z8. 1989 PAGS 3
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated five lots would be involved.
Councilman Billings stated he knows one of the property owners to
the north of Mr. Johnson has a structure in the middle of where the
alley was suppose to be and, even with the east six feet, he still
would be in violation of the code. He felt that person has a
vested interest in trying to obtain title to the entire alley.
Councilman Billings asked if the memorialization for both the east
and west half portions of the alley could be done at the same time.
Mr. Newman, Assistant City Attorney, stated if some of the property
owners do not want the property, there could be a problem.
Mayor Nee asked if it was known how many property owners would
participate in the cost for this memorialization.
Mr. Johnson stated if the price was reasonable at about $100 for
each property owner, he felt probably all of them would
partic:ipate.
Ms. Dacy stated she and the City Attorney, Mr. Herrick, discussed
the cost and Mr. Herrick agreed to do the work at a cost not to
exceed $1,000. She stated abutting property owners have agreed to
partic.ipate, if the City was involved so that their cost would be
reduced.
Counci:lwoman Jorgenson asked the cost for staff's time for their
work in vacating the alley.
Ms. Dacy stated she could not answer at this time since she was not
involved from the beginning.
Mr. Johnson stated a lot of staff time has gone into this vacation
as Ms. Dacy is the fourth or fifth person he has dealt with in
regard to the vacation. He felt because of new personnel, it
involved more staff time than if one person had handled it.
Mr. Johnson stated he would like to complete his improvement and
get the title cleared. He stated he felt someone made the decision
for the City to pay half the cost. He stated he is requesting a
decision from the Council if the City will or will not participate
in the legal costs.
Mr. John Early, owner of property to the south of Mr. Johnson,
stated the alley has been an eyesore and the City has done
absolutely nothing. He stated he would like to see an improvement
and would be willing to pay a small amount to get this
accomplished.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated he felt Councilman Billings
suggestion has some merit.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL I�EETING OF �UGIIST 28, 1989 P�GE 4
Mayor Nee stated he would have no problem with the City beazing the
initial expenses, and collecting these expenses if the property
owners agree to purchase the property.
Mr. Johnson stated he did not believe it would be beneficial for
the City unless the other four property owners indicate they would
buy the property for $300 each..
Councilman Billings felt staff, Mr. Johnson, and the four
neighboring property owners should meet and make sure everyone is
aware of what is happening and what their rights are. He felt all
possibilities should be explored to try and resolve this issue.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she would suggest staff review the
costs involved to vacate an alley and if the fee actually covers
the cost for staff's time.
DICK SHERRY 5922 HACKMAN AVENUE - RE: DISEASED TREE:
Mr. Sherry stated he has a diseased elm tree in his yard which was
planted as a boulevard tree and now needs to be removed. He stated
the tree, however, is 13 feet, 3 inches from the right-of-way and
to be considered boulevard trees, they must be within 10 feet of
the right-of-way. He stated the tree was planted before the street
was constructed and was not located within the ten foot easement
area. Mr. Sherry felt since this is a boulevard tree, the City
should remove it.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated Mr. Sherry is not the only one with
this problem as she has talked with Mr. Townsend, who also lives
on Hackman Avenue, about a similar problem. She stated the problem
is the City cannot use public funds to remove trees on private
property.
Councilman Schneider stated a tree across the street from Mr.
Sherry was removed by the City several years ago. He stated at
that time there was a proqram in which the City participated in the
cost, through a State qrant, and did remove diseased trees on
private property as funds were desiqnated for that purpose. He
stated the program is no lonqer in effect.
Councilman Schneider stated there is a proposal for an ordinance
amendment where the City would remove a diseased tree and assess
the cost back to the property owner. He stated if this ordinance
amendment is adopted, Mr. Sherry could use this means to have the
tree removed.
Councilman Billings felt the real determination if this tree is
located on the City's right-of-way is the lot pins, and not the
location of the roadway.
R DLEY CITY COIINCZL MBETING OF �QGQBT 28. 1989 PAGE 5
Councilman Schneider stated the City could check the location of
the lot pins.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated in conjunction with checkinq Mr.
Sherry's lot, she would also like Mr. Townsend's property checked
at 5874 Hackman Avenue.
OLD BUSINESS:
1. dRDINANCE NO 930 APPROVING A VACATION SAV #89-03. TO VACATE
A SIX FOOT AND THE EAST ONE FOOT OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
�ASEMENT IN CERTAIN TRACTS OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 94
AND IN THE GENA-RAE ADDITION BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
MOTIOI� by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 930 on the second reading and order publication.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, N[ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
1.1 CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST VAR #89-12. TO INCREASE
THE RE4UIRED MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE FROM 40$ TO 47$ TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL WAREHOUS�fMANUFACTURING AND OFFICE
SPACE ON LOT 7 BLOCK 2, EAST RANCH ESTATES SECOND ADDITION,
THE SAME BEING 7855 RANCHER'S ROAD N.E., BY CORTRON
CORPORATION•
Ms. L�acy, Planning Coordinator, stated staff has researched
variances granted in the past concerning maximum lot coverages.
She s�ated other communities were also contacted regarding their
ordinance requirements on lot coverage in general.
Ms. Dacy stated in the past, the City has granted variances for 45,
46, and 49 percent maximum lot coverage and four out of five cases
considered, the City has approved.
Ms. Dacy stated in reviewing requirements for other communities,
the a:rchitect for Cortron Corporation provided this information.
She stated of the communities surveyed, five had no requirements
at alY regarding lot coverage and the parking and building setbacks
contr�lled the lot coverage. She stated four communities
controlled lot coverage by using a calculation of building and
parking lot percentages; six communities had a maximum building
coverage of 50�; and the remaining nine are split between 35� and
45�. She stated Columbia Heights allows up to 90� coverage.
Ms. Dacy stated, based on this analysis, the City Attorney and she
agree that an ordinance amendment should be considered to increase
the 7lot coverage to 50�. She stated it is clear, by past
approvals, that 40$ maximum may not be realistic in some cases.
She stated as along as the Zoninq Ordinance has the parking
requirements and setbacks that should be sufficient to regulate the
expansion of a building on a commercial or industrial lot.
FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL l�BETING OF �IIGOBT 28. 1989 P�GE 6
Councilman Billings stated some precedent has been set in the past
and felt the ordinance needs to be reviewed, however, he would not
necessarily go along with the 50$.
MOTI�N by Councilman Billings to grant Variance Request, VAR �89-
12, to increase the required maximum lot coverage from 40$ to 47$
to allow the construction of additional warehouse/manufacturing and
office space at 7855 Rancher's Road N.E., by Cortron Corporation,
with the following stipulations: (1) the drainage plan shall be
approved by City staff; (2) underqround sprinkling shall be
installed; (3) a landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by
the City prior to issuance of the building permit; (4) the Appeals
Commission does not recommend further expansion on this site; and
(5) a dumpster enclosure shall be constructed, if necessary.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS•
2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
AUGUST 16. 1989:
A. ITEM FROM THE APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 1, 1989:
rONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE �ERMIT SP �89-08, TO ALLOW AN
�UTOMOTIVE REPAIR GARAGE AT 7570 HIGHWAY 65 N E BY KEITH'S
AUTO BODY•
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request for a
special use permit to allow a repair qarage at 7570 Highway 65 N.E.
She stated the site is zoned M-1, liqht industrial, with R-4 zoning
to the south, and M-1 to the west and north. She stated since 1983
there have been a number of auto repair qarages operating from this
site. She stated because there have been several changes in
ownership since 1983, the City has had a difficult time in
enforcing the code requirements.
Ms. Dacy stated this spring Mr. Keith Poppenhagen contacted the
City regarding operation of his auto repair qarage and he was
advised that a special use permit for this repair qarage was
necessary. She stated some of the site improvements needed are
paving, concrete curbs, landscaping, installation of sewer, and a
cleanup of debris and materials stored in the rear.
Ms. Dacy stated on May 17, 1989, the Planning Commission considered
this item. She stated because of the disrepair of the property,
the Commission was concerned if the buildings should be condemned.
She stated staff reviewed the site and the structural quality of
the two buildings and determined the buildings had to meet some
code requirements, but were not to the point where they could be
condemned.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF �OGDST Z8, 1989 PAGB 7
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission then reconsidered this
request on August 16 and recommended approval with nine
stipul.ations to eventually bring the property into compliance with
the cade. She reviewed these stipulations found on Pages 2II and
2JJ of the Council's agenda.
Mr. Mi.ke Thompson stated he did not know what transpired on August
16 as he was not present. He stated the property is currently tied
up in legal proceedings and hoped it would all be resolved within
the next several months. He stated American Life and Trustee went
bankrupt and turned over the properties to a Certified Public
Accountant to handle. Mr. Thompson stated it is not known who owns
the buildings and today his attorney advised him that the CPA wants
what is in escrow.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked who was collecting the rent for this
proper. ty . �
Mr. Tl�ompson stated he was collecting the rents and paying off the
first mortgage to make sure the buildings remain functional. He
stateci if they do obtain clear title of the property, they will
begin cleaning it up.
Councilman Schneider stated regardless of who owns the property,
there is a septic system that is leaking wastes on the property.
Ms. Dacy state the system is being pumped, but did not know about
the soil conditions. She stated the County does not have any
information since 1984. She stated the City's policy is before
renewfng the special use permit, there should be a plan to
eliminate these problems and code violations. She stated Mr.
Poppenhagen occupied the building not knowing a special use permit
was required, but was so advised when he applied for a permit for
a sign.
Counc:ilman Schneider asked Mr. Thompson if they could comply with
the sltipulations which Ms. Dacy had outlined.
Mr. Thompson stated they could not comply with some by the dates
outlined.
Ms. Dacy stated staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission
was more stringent, in terms of dates, then what the Commission
recommended to the Council.
Counc:ilman Schneider stated he can understand Mr. Thompson not
wanting to put any money into improving the site if he does not own
the property. He questioned how the City would proceed to
eliminate these code violations if clear ownership has not been
estab;lished.
,
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL I�IBBTING OF �IIGOST 28, 1989 P�aB 8
Mr. Newman, Assistant City Attorney, stated if there is a code
violation, criminal charges can be brouqht aqainst the property
owners. He stated his office made a very cursory examination of
the title and from the information provided, it does not support
that American Trustee filed bankruptcy. He stated an explanation
was requested of the title problems, but this has not been
received.
Ms. Dacy stated the file contains correspondence with previous
owners regarding code compliances. She stated after reviewing this
file, it was felt using the special use permit process would enable
the City to obtain compliance with the code for the entire
property. She stated the parkinq lot, buildinqs, and sewage are
all related to the use of the property.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the property could not hook up to
sewer and water rather than installing a holding tank.
Ms. Dacy stated the�property owner could petition the City to
connect to sewer and water and assess the costs against the
property.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how soon this could be done, if the
property owner petitioned the City for the improvement.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated a City does not have a
contractor at this time, but it probably could still be done this
year.
Councilman Billings stated if, in fact, the County states the
septic system is failing, there may be a public need to proceed
with the connection to City sewer and assess the property. He
stated he sympathizes with Mr. Poppenhagen as he is the one that
stands to lose here. He stated on the other hand, the property
owner has a vested interest as he is receiving rent for the
building.
Councilman Billings stated, at this time, it is not known who is
the fee owner of the property and, if 7570 Corporation is the fee
owner, he would not want to impose stipulations if they were not
present this evening to respond. He stated the question then
remains on how to enforce the stipulations.
Councilman Billings stated he would like a report from the alleged
owners as to the status of the title and for the City's attorney
to review the information presented.
I�ir. Newman stated he assumes Mr. Thompson's attorney has done some
investigation and the City is only requestinq a report on the
Btatus of the title. He stated from his information, 7570
Corporation does not even have an interest of record. He stated
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF �IIGIIST 28. 1989 PAGE 9
there appears to be two or three different entities that have
varied interests in the property.
Ms. Dacy stated a representative from 7570 Corporation signed the
application as the fee owner.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, suggested tabling this item until the
applicant can produce verification of ownership and use the
existing laws to enforce the code.
Councilman Schneider stated it seems if the issue of the title is
cloude.d, the City should proceed with the sewer, assess the cost
, aqainst the property and get the debris cleaned up.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table action on Special Use
Permit. Request, SP #89-08, until identification of the fee owner
can b� established. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTIO� by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to initiate a
reasonable search to ascertain who is the fee owner of this
propeY-ty and work with the petitioner, if possible; and review the
areas of violations of the existing code and take aggressive action
to enforce those items that are most significant to the public
safet�� issue such as the septic system and removal of debris on the
propexty. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote,
all vcting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousZy.
B. C:ONSIDERATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION:
This item was deleted from the agenda.
C. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE RE4UIRED
REAR YARD SETBACK ON CORNER LOTS FORM 25 FEET MINIMUM TO 10
�EET MINIMUM IN R-1 DISTRICTS:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this proposed ordinance
amendment was reviewed by the Appeals and Planning Commission and
recommended for approval by the Council. She stated the intent of
the ordinance is that corner lots operate with two front yards and
two side yards. She stated the only other community that has
something similar to this proposed amendment is Brooklyn Center.
Ms. Dacy stated the Appeals commission was concerned about
overcrowding in the rear yard, but with the 10 foot setback and 5
feet an the other lot, there still would be some green area of 10
to 20 feet between structures. She stated an alternative would be
to continue with the present ordinance and consider each and every
case on a variance basis. She stated the staff and Appeals
Commission pursued this research because of the number of corner
lots :in the City.
pRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTZNG OF �DG�ST 28, 1989 P�G$ 10
Mayor Nee asked if there are problems with the present ordinance.
Ms. Dacy stated there are some problems in determininq what is the
front �f the lot. She stated staff and the Appeals and Planning
Commissions reviewed this as a potential means to ease the
situation and help their interpretation of the code. She stated
if the Council is not comfortable with this amendment, the variance
requests would continue to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
Councilman Schneider felt staff should probably take some random
homes in different areas and determine the implications if this
amendment was approved.
Councilman Billings stated the Appeals Commission had several of
these variance requests at one time. He felt the Commission is
looking for guidance and clarification, however, he is also
confused. He stated the problem is if you allow a variance for
one, you have to allow it for another and a precedent is set.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this item and refer to
staff to supply more data and sample cases. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting of August 16, 1989. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carr�ed unanimously.
3. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE, VAR �89-13, TO INCR�ASE THE
MAXIMUM ALLAWABLE S4UARE FOOTAGE FOR A WALL SIGN FROM 205
S UARE FEET O 600 S UARE ET O W OR D ONAL
SIGNAGE FOR A MOVZE THEATER ON LOTS 1 2 28 AND 29, BLOCK
� COMMERCE PARK THE SAME BEING 250 OSBORNE ROAD N.E.. BUY
,TFROME FARR LL OF SBF DEVELOPMENT CORP4RATION•
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated SBF Development Corporation
is requesting a variance for four siqns for the movie theater to
be located at 250 Osborne Road. She stated the four types of
signage proposed are eight 4 by 4 foot poster containers; one 9 by
82.5 foot marquee; one 9.33 by 33 foot vertical sign; and one 4 by
4 foot readerboard for Perkin's Restaurant. Ms. Dacy stated the
City's ordinance does not provide for movie theater signage per se.
Ms. Dacy stated the cities of Brooklyn Center and Coon Rapids were
contacted as they have an ordinance providinq for theater signage.
She stated Coon Rapids permits a maximum square feet of 600 and
Brooklyn Center permits a 250 square foot pylon siqn and wall
signage up to 30$ of the wall area. She stated this request
represents about il$ of the wall area. Ms. Dacy stated there will
not be a freestanding sign for the theater.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF �IIGOST 28, 1989 PAGB 11
Ms. Dacy state the Appeals Commission recommended approval of this
variance with several stipulations as outlined on Page 3E of the
Council's agenda.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to grant Variance Request, VAR �89-
13, to increase the maximum allowable square footage for a wall
sign from 205 square feet to 600 square feet to allow for
additional signage for a movie theater at 250 Osborne Road, as
follows: (1) eight 4 by 4 foot poster containers; the poster
container material shall be consistent with the architectural
styling of the theater; (2) one 9 by 82.5 foot marquee (movie
names, times, and other messages shall only be displayed on the 9
by 18 foot readerboards on either side of the "Movies 8" tower; (3)
one 4 by 33 foot vertical sign to state "Movies 8"; (4) one 4 by
4 foot readerboard for Perkin's Restaurant, to be located on the
wall facia of the movie theater and subject to receiving a sign
permit. Further, the signs shall be consistent with the plans
which are part of the staff report dated August 1, 1989 and there
shall be no flashing or motion signs. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
4.
5.
This item will be considered after Item 5 since Item 5 is
related to Item 3.
CONSIDERATION OF COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN APPROVAL FOR OSBORNE
CROSSINGS, 250 OSBORNE ROAD N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this siqn plan limits tenant
signage to a sign band along the front wall of the shopping center.
She stated this Sign Plan is consistent with the City's Sign
Ordinance.
MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to approve the Comprehensive Sign
Plan for Osborne Crossings, 250 Osborne Road N. E., as submitted
as an attachment to staff's memo dated Auqust 17, 1989 and entitled
"Osborne Crossings Sign Criteria". Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there were any plans to use
portable signs as these do become a problem for the City's code
enforcement division.
Mr. Farrell stated he would rather not exclude them, but if it has
been a problem for the City, he can understand the reasoning why
they would not want to allow them.
MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to amend the above motion by adding
No. 11 to the ��Osborne Crossings Sign Criteria" to read as follows:
(il) All temporary signs shall be approved by SBF Development
Corporation. Further, to add the statement that all references to
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL KEETING OF �IIGOST Z8. 1989 P�GB 12
SBF Development Corporation shall mean SBF Development Corporation,
its heirs or assiqns in interest. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, I�iayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Iriayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
4. �'ONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF 1990 JOINT COOPERA ION AGREEMENT
WITH ANOKA COUNTY FOR E COMMUNIT DEVE MENT IACK GRANT
PROGRAM•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the 1990 Joint
Cooperation Agreement with Anoka County for the Community
Development Block Grant Proqram. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
6. CONSIDERATION OF A RE UEST FROM NORTH SUBURBAN CENTER FOR THE
ARTS TO REALLACATE S2 255 FROM LOCKE HOUSE PROJECT. AND TO
REALLOCATE S6 500 FROM COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated the North Suburban Center
for the Arts has submitted two requests to the City to reallocate
its CDBG monies. She stated there is $2,255 remaining in the
Banfill Tavern/Locke House restoration project authorized in 1987
and they are requesting use of the money to conduct senior art
classes at the Banfill Tavern. She stated these monies have to be
expended prior to the end of 1989.
Ms. Dacy stated the other request by the North Suburban Center for
the Arts is that the City reallocate $6,500 from 1989 CDBG funds
designated for the commercial rehabilitation program for completion
of interior improvements to the second floor of the Banfill
Tavern/Locke House. She stated it is her understanding the
commercial rehabilitation proqram has not been used to any extent
in the last several years.
Ms. Dacy stated the North Suburban Center for the Arts typically
receives some amount of CDBG funds on an annual basis;
unfortunately, due to extenuatinq circumstances the 1989 allocation
was not provided to them.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reallocate the $2,255 remaining
in the Banfill Tavern/Locke Iiouse restoration project for 1987 and
reallocate $6,500 from the 1989 CDBG commercial rehabilitation
program to the North Suburban Center for the Arts. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Councilman Billinqs stated he is not opposed to allocating the
funds, but wondered if $2,255 really was remaininq from the Banfill
Tavern/Locke House restoration project. He also wondered if it
*RIDLBY CITY COD1dCIL 1�$TING OF �OG�ST 28. 1989 P�GE 13
needed to be reallocated in order to complete improvements at the
Locke House. Councilman Billinqs stated there is about $800
remaining from 1988 CDBG funds and asked if this vas taken into
consideration.
Mr. John Cassayd-Smith, President of the North Suburban Center for
the Arts, stated he understands there is about $500 remaining,
however, there is a bill coming for about $300. He stated the
expenditure of the money is in the hands of the Senior Center and
the use for these funds is for transportation and classes for
Seniors. Mr. Cassayd-Smith stated Councilman Billings' question,
if there actually were any remaininq funds, he cannot answer since
this is controlled by the County.
Councilman Billings stated he does not have a problem with
reallocating the funds, but wanted to make sure these funds were
available.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
7. �'ONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING
THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 104 ENTITLED "TREE DISEASE"
BY RENAMING CHAPTER TO "DISEASED TREES" AND BY AMENDING
SECTIONS 104 02 104 04 104 06 104 08 104 09 AND 104 10•
Mr. Flora, Public Works Oirector, stated staff has identified some
changes to the Diseased Tree Ordinance which inc2ude (1)
identification of the Superintendent of Public Works as the City
Forester; (2) identification of the City Manager as the Director
and Controller of the program; (3j extend the response date for
tree removal from ten to thirty days; (4) allow the property owner
to have a private diseased tree' removed and assessed to the
property for a period of five years; (5) defined a boulevard tree
within the street right-of-way; and (6) identified the City's
responsibility for removal of boulevard trees and the replacement
of bare root trees on the owner's property.
Councilman Schneider stated it seems that Section 104.06 mandates
an inspection proqram and felt the wordinq of Item 1 should be
chanqed by substituting the word "may" for "shall" and substituting
the words pdeemed appropriate" instead of "often as practicable'�.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the readinq and approve the
ordinance upon first readinq. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to amend Section 10.06 as follows:
Item 1, first line, substitute the word "may" for "shall" and
change the words "often as practicable" to "deemed appropriate".
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
lRIDLEY CITY CO�I�ICIL �ETIKG O! �OGIIBT 28. 1f89 P�GB 14
UPON A VOICE VOTE TP►I�N ON THE l�AIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilwoman Jorqenson stated it �hould be noted that if this
amendment is adopted, a property owner aay have a diseased tree
removed from his property by the City and the cost assessed to the
property for a period of five years.
8. CONSID RATION OF AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR 3 MG CONCRETE
�FG£RVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 192:
Mr. Rollmer, �►EC Engineerinq, stated the epoxy material which TMI
wants to use is Aquatapoxy material which �►►EC feels is inferior to
the materials specified. He stated after additional investiqation,
it has been found that TMI proposes to use �►quatapoxy only if the
project can be completed this fall. He stated PiEC would recommend
the low bidder, JMG Contracting, Inc. be awarded the bid for Phase
1 of the project and that the bids be rejected and readvertised for
Phase 2. �
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for Phase 1
of the 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 to the low
bidder, JMG Contracting, Inc. in the amount of 5118,900. Seconded
by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reject the bids received for
Phase 2 for the 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 and
authorize readvertisinq for bids. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
9. CONSID�RATION OF 74WARDING THE CONTF3ACT FOR 1.5 MG CONCRETE
RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO 193 (53RD AVENUE l�►ND JOHNSON
STREET):
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated it is recommended the bid
be awarded to the low bidder, TMI Coatinqs, Inc. for alternate 1
in the amount of S91, 850. He stated TliI's references have been
checked with the �ities of Duluth and Minneapolis and both cities
were satisfied with their work.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to award the contract for the 1.5 MG
Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 193 (53rd �►venue and Johnson
Street) to the low bidder, TMI Coatings, Inc. for �ilternate 1 in
the amount of 591,850. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the sotion carried
unanimously.
1►RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL l[$$TZNG OF �OGOBT 28. 1989 P�GB 15
10. CONSZDERATION OF A CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA FOR INSPECTION SERVICES:
MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to approve the contractual aqreement
with the State of Minnesota for inspection services. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE FOR THE MUNICIPAL
rFNTER POLICE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM:
Mr. Hill, Public Safety Director, stated the police surveillance
system was left out of the specifications for the police facility.
He stated since the move is planned for September 7, it is urgent
that this equipment be purchased and installed.
Mr. Hill stated the consultant, Electronic Interiors, estimated a
cost for the equipment and materials at $6, 295 and labor around
$1,200 for a total of $7,495. He stated two quotes have been
received, one from Access Control Technologies, a Division of
Security World, and one from Electrosonic. He stated Access
Control Technologies' quote was $5,222 for equipment and materials
and $600 for installation, labor and traininq, for a total of
$5,822. He stated Electrosonic quoted $6,924.11 for the equipment
and materials and S3, 403. 33 for installation and labor, for a total
of 510,327.44.
Mr. Hill stated staff would recommend that Council authorize the
expenditure of $5,822 from the Capital Improvement Fund for Access
Control Technologies to install this equipment.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the expenditure of
$5,822 for the purchase and installation of the police surveillance
equipment from Access Control Technologies. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
12. CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No.
27997 through 28223. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
13. LICENSES•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorqenson to approve the licenses as
submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
�eT^,�y CIT� COIII�ICIL KE TZ�G OZ �D�OBT 28. il�9 ��GE 16
14. EGTTMATES_
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the �sti�ates as
submitted:
Cfvic Center Remodeling
Pay Application �10 588,058.00
Through 7-31-89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1�llied Blacktop
10503 89th �►venue N.
Maple Grove, I+�l 55369
Street Improvement Project
No. ST 1989-10 (Sealcoat) . . 5g0,941.56
Estimate No. 1 . . • • • • • • • • • ' '
Gammon Brothers �
13845 Northdale Blvd.
Roqers, I+W 55374
Street Improvement Project
No. ST 1989 - 1 i 2 $47,005.91
Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gunderson Brothers
2325 Snelling �►venue
Minneapolis, I�I 55404
1989 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb,
Gutter i Sidewalk Project S 3,554.'71
Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . • • • •
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Hayor Nee declared the �otion carried unanimously.
�nT�truxl+rENT •
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the seeting. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the �otion carried unanimously and the Reqular
Meeting of the Fridley City Council of l►ugust 28, 1989 adjourned
at 10:37 p•m-
Re�pectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad iiilliam J. M�e
Secretazy to the City Council l�tayor
1lppzoved :
1
CITY OF FRIDLEY
11NORA COIINTY, 1�IINNE80TA
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ]�188E88MENT FOR BEWER LATERALS,
�ATER LATERALS, 11ND BERVICE CONNECTIONS
Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will
meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the llth day
of September, 1989, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., to hear and pass upon all
objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the
following improvements, to-wit:
1989 BERVICE CONNECTION
NOT HERETOFORE FIIRNZSHED AND !�VlrILABLE
The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the
total amount of 518.087.05 is now on file and open to public
inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk
of said City. ,
The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the
construction and furnishing of sewer laterals, water laterals, and
service connections in and to the properties, as follows:
LOT 2, BLOCR 3
LOT 1, BLOCR 3
PART OF LOT 6
LOT 12� BLOCR 1
LOT 8
SHOREWOOD PLAZA
$HOREWOOD PLAZA
AODITOR�B SIIBDIVISZON NO 77
SPRING BROOR PARR 2ND ADDITION
AIIDITOR�B BIIBDIVISION NO 77
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of
them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of
them and lying within the qeneral are above. Said improvements
will be assessed against the properties within the above noted
areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the land
therein contained according to the benefits received.
At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral
objections to the proposed assessments for each of said
improvements. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of t�ny
individual assessment unless a written objection signed by ttae
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the residing officer at the
public hearing.
A property owner may appeal an assessment of the district court by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within
thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such
notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
3
1A
Page 2- Notice of Hearing on Assessment for Sewer and Water
Laterals, and Service Connections
The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 47 - 1981 on April 6,
1981, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain
senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments
constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the
qranting of the deferments: the property must be homestead
property, and the owner must be at least sixty-five (65) years of
age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, one member must
meet this age requirement.
The application for said deferral must be made within the first
thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll
by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred
payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will
make application to the City of Fridley an forms provided by the
City.
The City Council will consider each application on an individual
basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen
hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for
the special assessment exceeds two (2) per cent of the adjusted
gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal
Inc�me Tax Return.
The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus
applicable interest shall become due when any of the following
happen: the death of the owner, proviaed that the surviving spouse
is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or
subdivision of the property or any part thereof; loss of homestead
status for any reason; the City Council determines that further
deferral is not in the public interest.
The assessment roll as presently calculated shows an assessment of
�(Amount) for (Leaal Description) under 1989 Service Connections
to be assessed over fifteen (15) years at eight (8) per cent
interest.
The property owner may pay the total special assessment to the City
of Fridley within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment
with no addition of any interest. If the entire special assessment
is not paid with the thirty (30) day period, but is paid before
October 15th in the year in which the roll is adopted, interest is
charged from the date of the adoption of the assessment to the date
on which the assessment is paid.
Partial payment of an assessment which is not less than one-half
thereof, provided that such partial payment shall in any event be
in a sum of at least One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), may be made
within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment. If a
partial payment is made, the original assessment will be reduced
by this amount, and the remaining balance shall be certified for
collection as a part of the original assessment roll.
4
Page 3- Notice of Hearing on Assessment for Sewer and Water
Laterals, and Service Connections
If the assessment is not paid by October 15th in the year adopted,
the first payment of principal and interest will be included on
the following year's tax statement. To the first payment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
adoption of the new assessment through December 31 of the following
year. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on the balance of unpaid principal. The
entire remaining balance of an assessment subsequent to the current
year's payment may be paid at any time after the first year, but
the payment on the yearly tax statement does include interest to
December 31, of that year.
DATED TIiIB DAY OF , 1989 HY ORDER OF THE CITY
COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
ATTEST:
BHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
11ILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
1B
0
5
2
CZTY OF FRIDLEY
l�NOK!► COIINTY, IdINNESOTA
DTOTICE OF HEARING ON !►SSEBBAiENT FOR RliT$R� B7INITARY
BEWER � STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 110. 183
Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will
meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the ith day
of September, 1989, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., to hear and pass upon all
objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the
following improvements, to-wit:
WATER, SANITARY SEWER i BTORM SEAER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 183
The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the
total amount of �38.726.80 is now on file and open to public
inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk
of said City.
The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the
construction of water and sanitary sewer services and storm sewer
system and related appurtenances located as follows:
IINIVERSITY AVENUE WEST SERVICE DRZVE (83RD 11VENOE TO NORTH 500')
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of
them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of
them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements
will be assessed against the properties within the above noted
areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands
therein contained according to the benefits received.
At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral
objections to the proposed assessments for each of said
improvements. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the residing officer at the
public hearing.
A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within
thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such
notice with the district court within ten (l0) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 47 - 1981 on April 6,
1981, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain
senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments
constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the
granting of the deferments: the property must be homestead
property, and the owner must be at least sixty-five (65) years of
Page 2- Notice of Hearing on Assessment for Water, Sanitary Sewer
& Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 183
age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, one member must
meet this age requirement.
The application for said deferral must be made within the first
thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll
by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred
payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will
make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the
City.
The City Council will consider each application on an individual
basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen
hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for
the special assessment exceeds two (2) per cent of the adjusted
gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal
Income Tax Return. �
The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus
applicable interest shall become due when any of the following
happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse
is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or
subdivision of the property or any part that further deferral is
not in the public interest.
The assessment roll as presently calculated shows an assessment of
S(Amount) for (Leaal Description) under Water. Sanitarv Sewer &
Storm Sewer Improvement Prot ct No. 183 to be assessed over went
20 years at eight (8�) per cent interest.
2A
The property owner may pay the total special assessment to the City
of Fridley within thirty (30} days of adoption of the assessment
with no addition of any interest. Zf the entire special assessment
is not paid within the thirty (30) day period, but is paid before
October 15th in the year in which the roll is adopted, interest is
charged from the date of the adoption of the assessment to the date
on which the assessment is paid.
Partial payment of an assessment which is not less than one-half
thereof, provided that such partial payment shall in any event be
in a sum of at least One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), may be made
within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment. If a
partial payment is made, the original assessment will be reduced
by this amount, and the remaining balance shall be certified for
collection as a part of the original assessment roll.
If the assessment is not paid by October 15th in the year adopted,
the first payment of principal and interest will be included on the
following year's tax statement. To the first payment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
adoption of the new assessment through December 31 of the following
10
r�
Page 3- Notice of Hearing on Assessment for Water, Sanitary Sewer
& Storm Sewer Zmprovement Project No. 183
year. To each subsequent install�ent when due shall be added
interest for one year on the balance of unpaid principal. The
entire remaining balance of an assessment subsequent to the current
year's payment may be paid at any time after the first year, but
the payment on the yearly tax statement does include interest to
December 31, of that year.
DATED THIB DAY OF . 1989 BY ORDER OF THE CITY
COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERR
WZLLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
�
11
�
CITY OF FRZDLEY
AI�TOlU COIII�TY, l[I�TNESOTA
NOTICE OF H8l�RING ON ]1885881�IBNT FOR �1�iTBR, B]�IiTITARY
BEWER i� BTORI�t B81IER I1�IPROVEI�IENT PROJECT i10. 188
Notice is hereby qiven that the Council of the City of Fridley will
a�eet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the ilth day
of September, 1989, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., to hear and pass upon all
objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the
following improvements, to-wit:
�TER, 8l�NITARY SEWER � BTORM BE1fER IldPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 188
The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the
total amount of S236.548.51 is now on file and open to public
inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk
of said City.
The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the
construction of water mains, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer, and
related appurtenances located as follows:
l�iORTHCO BOSINE88 PARR ON 73RD AVENIIE i 1dORTHCO DRIVE
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of
them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of
them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements
will be assessed against the properties within the above noted
areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands
therein contained according to the benefits received.
At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral
objections to the proposed assessments for each of said
improvements. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the residing officer at the
public hearing.
A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within
thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such
notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 47 - 1981 on April 6,
1981, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain
eenior citizens where the payment of said special assessments
constitutes a hardship. The following factors will qovern the
qranting of the deferments: the property must be homestead
property, and the owner must be at least sixty-five (65) years of
C�
3A
paqe 2- Notice of Hearinq on ]►ssessment tor IIater, Banitary Sewer
i Storm 8erer Isprov�aent Projsct �To. 188
age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, one member must
meet this age requirement.
The application for said deferral must be made within the first
thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll
by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred
payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will
make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the
City.
The City Council will consider each application on an individual
basis; however, the general policy is to qrant senior citizen
hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for
the special assessment exceeds two (2) per cent of the adjusted
gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal
Income Tax Return.
The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus
applicable interest shall become due when any of the following
happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse
is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or
subdivision of the property or any part that further deferral is
not in the public interest.
The assessment roll as presently calculated shows an assessment of
5(Amount) for j Legal Description) under Water, Sanitary Sewer &
�torm Sewer Improvement Proiect No. 188 to be assessed over fifteen
(15) years at eight (8) per cent interest.
The property owner may pay the total special assessment to the City
of Fridley within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment
with no addition of any interest. If the entire special assessment
is not paid within the thirty (30) day period, but is paid before
October 15th in the year in which the roll is adopted, interest is
charged from the date of the adoption of the assessment to the date
on which the assessment is paid.
Partial payment of an assessment which is not less than one-half
thereof, provided that such partial payment shall in any event be
in a sum of at least One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) , may be made
within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment. If a
partial payment is made, the original assessment will be reduced
by this amount, and the remaining balance shall be certified for
collection as a part of the original assessment roll.
If the assessment is not paid by October 15th in the year adopted,
the first payment of principal and interest will be included on the
following year's tax statement. To the first payment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
adoption of the new assessment through December 31 of the following
Paqe 3- Notice oi Hearinq on llssessment for 1later, Banitary 8exer
i storm seMer Iaprov�aeat Proj•ct lio. iaa
year. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on the balance of unpaid principal. The
entire remaining balance of an assessment subsequent to the current
year's payment may be paid at any time after the first year, but
the payment on the yearly tax statement dces include interest to
December 31, of that year.
DI►TED THIS DAY OF , 1989 BY ORDER OF THE CITY
COtTNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRZDLEY
�ILLI� J. NEE - KAYOR
l�TTEST : �
BHIRLEY A. iiAAPALA - CITY CLERR
3B
�
4
CITY OF lRIDLBY
71NOlCA COVI�ITY, 1[Z�TNESOTl�
�10TICE OF SEARIl�1G O�i 71888881�IgNT FOR BTREET
IIrIPROVE1dENT pROJECT li0. BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART i►)
Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will
meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the lith day
of September, 1989, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., to hear and pass upon all
objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the
following improvements, to-wit:
BTREET IKPROVEZ�tENT PROJECT �10. BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2
( PI1RT A)
The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the
total amount of 51,121,674.79 is now on file and open to public
inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk
of said City.
The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the
construction of street improvements including grading, stabilized
base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks,
water and sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, landscaping,
lighting, signals, and other facilities located as follows:
PART A Rice Creek Road - T.H. 65 to
East Batellite Fire Station
Osborne Road Bike Path
63rd !►venue i Rice Creek Road
Central 1lvenue
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of
them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of
them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements
will be assessed aqainst the properties within the above noted
areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands
therein contained according to the benefits received.
At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral
objections to the proposed assessments for each of said
improvements. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection siqned by the
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the residing officer at the
public hearing.
A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within
thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such
notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
16
4A
Paqe 2- �otice ot H�ariaq on �ss�ssm�nt for Btreet Improvament
project �o. Btr�et 1988 - 1 i 2(Part �)
The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 47 - 1981 on April 6,
1981, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain
senior citizens where the payment of said Bpecial assessments
constitutes a hardship. The followinq factors will qovern the
qrantinq of the deferments: the property must be homestead
property, and the owner must be at least sixty-five (65) years of
age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, one member must
meet this age requirement.
The application for said deferral must be made within the first
thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll
by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred
payments on fonas prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will
make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the
City. �
The City Council will consider each application on an individual
basis; however, the qeneral policy is to qrant senior citizen
hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for
the special assessment exceeds two (2) per cent of the adjusted
gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal
Income Tax Return.
The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus
applicable interest shall become due when any of the following
happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse
is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or
subdivision of the property or any part that further deferral is
not in the public interest.
The assessment roll as presently calculated shows an assessment of
�lAmount) for jLegal Description) under Street Improvement Proiect
No. Street 1988 - 1& 2(Part A) to be assessed over thirteen (13)
years at nine (9) per cent interest beqinning in 1991.
The property owner may pay the total special assessment to the City
of Fridley within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment
with no addition of any interest. If the entire special assessment
is not paid within the thirty (30) day period, but is paid before
October 15th in the year in which the roll is adopted, interest is
charged from the date of the adoption of the assessment to the date
on which the assessment is paid.
Partial payment of an assessment which is not less than one-half
thereof, provided that such partial payment shall in any event be
in a sum of at least One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), aay be made
within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment. If a
partial payment is made, the original assessment will be reduced
Paqe 3- �otice of H�arinq on �ssessment tor Street Zmprovement
Proj�ct No. Btr��t 1988 - i i 2(part �)
by this amount, and the remaining balance shall be certified for
collection as a part of the original assessment roll.
If the assessment is not paid by October 15th in the year adopted,
the first payment of principal and interest will be included on the
following year's tax statement. To the first payment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
adoption of the new assessment through December 31 of the following
year. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on the balance of unpaid principal. The
, entire remaining balance of an assessment subsequent to the current
year's payment may be paid at any time after the first year, but
the payment on the yearly tax statement does include interest to
December 31, of that year.
DATED THIS DAY OF � 1989 BY ORDER OF THE CITY
COIINCZL OF THE CITY OF FRZDLEY
1/ILLZfiM J. NEE - I�IAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY !�. HAAPALA - CITY CLBRIC
, =
17
4C
CZTY OF FRIDL$Y
I12i0�1 COQ�iTY, YIliNE80TA
�iOTICB OF HB7�RI�TG O�i A88888KBi1T FOR STR88T
ZI[PROVEK$NT PROJBCT lTO. BTRBBT 1988 - 1 i Z
(PART B)
Notice is hereby qiven that the Council of the City of Fridley will
meet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the ilth day
of September, 1989, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., to hear and pass upon all
objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the
following improvements, to-wit:
STREET ZI�IPROVEI�SI�iT PROJBCT �10. BTRE$T 1988 - 1 i� 2
( Pl�RT B )
The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the
total amount of S14.600.00 is now on file and open to public
inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk
of said City. �
The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the
construction of street improvements includinq grading, stabilized
base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and qutter, sidewalks,
water and sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, landscaping,
lighting, siqnals, and other facilities located as follows:
Pl�RT B 6 4 0 0 CBNTRAL AVENIIE ld . E.
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of
them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of
them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements
will be assessed against the properties within the above noted
areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands
therein contained according to the benefits received.
At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral
objections to the proposed assessments for each of said
improvements. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection siqned by the
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the residing officer at the
public hearing.
A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by
serving notice of the appeal upon the 1rlayor or City Clerk within
thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such
notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 47 - 1981 on April 6,
1981, relating to the deferral of special assessments for certain
senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments
4D
Paqe 2- �otice of H�arinq on �ss�ssa�nt tor Btr��t I�provement
Proj�ct �o. 8tr��t 1988 - 1 i Z(Part 8)
constitutes a hardship. The following factors will qovern the
granting of the deferments: the property must be homestead
property, and the owner must be at least sixty-five (65) years of
age or older, and in the case of husband and wife, one member must
meet this age requirement.
The application for said deferral must be made within the first
thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll
by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred
payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will
� make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the
City.
The City Council will consider each application on an individual
basis; however, the general policy is to grant senior citizen
hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for
the special assessment exceeds two (2) per cent of the adjusted
gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal
Income Tax Return.
The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus
applicable interest shall become due when any of the following
happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse
is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or
subdivision of the property or any part that further deferral is
not in the public interest.
The assessment roll as presently calculated shows an assessment of
S(Amount� for jLeaal Descriptionl under Street Improvement Proiect
No. Street 1988 - 1& 2(Part B) to be assessed over fifteen (15)
years at nine and one half (9 1/2) per cent interest.
The property owner may pay the total special assessment to the City
of Fridley within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment
with no addition of any interest. If the entire special assessment
is not paid within the thirty (30) day period, but is paid before
October 15th in the year in which the roll is adopted, interest is
charged from the date of the adoption of the assessment to the date
on which the assessment is paid.
Partial payment of an assessment which is not less than one-half
thereof, provided that such partial payment shall in any event be
in a sum of at least One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), may be made
within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment. If a
partial payment is made, the original assessment will be reduced
by this amount, and the remaining balance shall be certified for
collection as a part of the oriqinal assessment roll.
If the assessment is not paid by October 15th in the year adopted,
the first payment of principal and interest will be included on the
Paqe 3- yotic• ot H�arinq oa 7►ssassment !or 8tr�st Iaprovem�nt
Project �io. Btr��t 1988 - 1 i 2(Part B)
following year's tax statement. To the first payment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
adoption of the new assessment throuqh December 31 of the followinq
year. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on the balance of unpaid principal. The
entire remaining balance of an assessment subsequent to the current
year's payment may be paid at any time after the first year, but
the payment on the yearly tax statement does include interest to
December 31, of that year.
DATED THIB Dl�Y OF , 1989 BY ORDBR OF THE CITY
COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRZDI�Y
11ILLIliM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEBT:
BHIRLEY A. 8!�►PALA - CITY CI.ERR
4E
2i
4F
CITY OF FRIDLBY
711iO1Cl� COIINTY � KINNESOTA
lTOTIC$ OF HEl1RI�TG O�1 716BBSB1i8ii'!' 1rOR BTREET
ZI�iPROVEl�IE1�1T PROJBCT NO. BTRE$T 1988 - 1 i Z
(PART C)
Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will
neet at the Fridley Municipal Center in said City on the ilth day
of September, 1989, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. , to hear and pass upon all
objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the
following improvements, to-wit:
STREET IKPROPEMEI�IT PROJECT NO. BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART C)
The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements in the
total amount of S37,379.69 is now on file and open to public
inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk
of said City.
The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the
construction of street improvements including grading, stabilized
base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks,
water and sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, landscaping,
lighting, signals, and other facilities located as follows:
Pl�RT C BEARS SIIRPL�B P!►RICZNG LOT
T2ie area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of
them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of
them and lying within the general area above. Said improvements
will be assessed against the properties within the above noted
areas -in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands
therein contained according to the benefits received.
At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral
objectians to the proposed assessments for each of said
improvements. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection siqned by the
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the
assessment hearing or presented to the residing officer at the
public hearing.
A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within
thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such
notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service
upon the Mayor or City Clerk.
The City of Fridley adopted Resolution No. 47 - 1981 on April 6,
1981, relatinq to the deferral of special assessments for certain
senior citizens where the payment of said special assessments
paqe 2- �otice of H�arinq oa �ssessmsnt ior Btreot Improvament
Project �o. Btr��t 1988 - i i Z(Bart C)
constitutes a hardship. The following factors will govern the
qranting of the deferments: the property must be homestead
property, and the owner must be at least sixty-five (65) years of
aqe or older, and in the case of husband and wife, one member must
meet this age requirement.
The application for said deferral must be made within the first
thirty (30) days after the adoption of the final assessment roll
by the City Council. The owner will make application for deferred
payments on forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor, and will
make application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the
City.
The City Council will consider each application on an individual
basis; however, the �general policy is to grant senior citizen
hardship special assessment deferrals when the annual payment for
the special assessment exceeds two (2) per cent of the adjusted
gross income of the owners as determined by the most recent Federal
Income Tax Return.
The deferral will be terminated and all amounts accumulated plus
applicable interest shall become due when any of the following
happen: the death of the owner, provided that the surviving spouse
is not otherwise eligible for the deferral; the sale, transfer, or
subdivision of the property or any part that further deferral is
not in the public interest.
The assessment roll as presently calculated shows an assessment of
S(Amount� for SLegal Description) under Street Improvement Project
No. Street 1988 - 1& 2(Part C) to be assessed over en (10) years
at eight (8) per cent interest.
The property owner may pay the total special assessment to the City
of Fridley within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment
with no addition of any interest. If the entire special assessment
is not paid within the thirty (30) day period, but is paid before
October 15th in the year in which the roll is adopted, interest is
charged from the date of the adoption of the assessment to the date
on which the assessment is paid.
Partial payment of an assessment which is not less than one-half
thereof, provided that such partial payment shall in any event be
in a sum of at least One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), may be made
within thirty (30) days of adoption of the assessment. If a
partial payment is made, the original assessment will be reduced
by this amount, and the remaining balance shall be certified for
collection as a part of the original assessment roll.
4G
paqe 3- �otice of H�arinq on �ss�saasnt tor 8treet I�provement
Projsct �o. Btr��t 1988 - 1 i 2(Part C)
If the assessment is not paid by October 15th in the year adopted,
the first payment of principal and interest will be included on the
following year's tax statement. To the first payment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
adoption of the new assessment through December 31 of the following
year. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on the balance of unpaid principal. The
entire remaining balance of an assessment subsequent to the current
year's payment may be paid at any time after the first year, but
the payment on the yearly tax statement does include interest to
December 31, of that year.
DATED THIS DAY OF � 1989 BY ORDER OF THE CITY
COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
1IZLLIl�l�i J. NEE - l�tliYOR
l�iTTEBT:
SHZRLEY fi. HAAPALA - CITY CLERR
4H
23
E „�,,,,,•,• ,�,,,
5l'K�.,
w.f i l"
P.�+hs
S±r� ��tti
M��.�,!r�,nncc
MEMORANDUM
- - •�.
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager,} � PW89-321
FROM: John G. F1ora,fPublic Works Director
DATE: August 18, 1989
SIIBJECT: Diseased Tree Ordinance
We have prepared some recommended changes to our Diseased Tree
Ordinance Chapter 104.
The changes include:
1) Identification of the Superintendent of Public Works as
the City Forester.
2) Identification of the City Manager as the Director and
Controller of the program.
3) We have extended the response date for tree removal from
ten (10) to thirty (30) days.
4) We have allowed the property owner to have a private
diseased tree removed and assessed to the property for
a period of five (5) years.
5) We have defined a boulevard tree within the street right-
of-way.
6) We have identified the City's responsibility for removal
of boulevard trees and the replacement of bare root trees
on the owner's property.
Recommend the Council consider these changes and approve the
amendment to Chapter 104 of our City Code.
JGF/ts
Attachments
5
�, �
•
. •�� � r� « .
•:•.� � r• •- •�:r�� � �� � �.�. . . n� M •� � � • ►• • ���
1 • ;r Y �� �'J�1 �l `15�• `1 •�s /• 11 • /• • ti�' •
�1 `10+• `1�� �'I�I�. � I� � I� I� 1 `iy � �. 1 � 1
1- 1� 1• 1. 1� 1: • I� 1• 1•
5A
Zhe City Ca�.uzci,l of the City of FYidley does he.reby ordain as follvws:
104.02. F� POi6ITICN Q�ATID
Th�e powers ar�d duties of the City Forester as set forth in this Ci�apter are
hereby oonferred uq�nn the Superintendent of
Public Works and all designated representatives. It is the duty of the Forester
to 000rdinate w�der the direc�tion arid oontrol of the � City Manaqer all
activities of the City relating to the control and prevention of tree diseases.
The Forester shall re�.r�cl to the � Citv Manacier the details of the
program for the o�ntrol of tree diseases and pexform the duties incident to such
a program adopted by the Ci Council.
104.04. NtTI.SANCFS I�JQ'1�
4. Ariy dead Oak tree, or part thexeof, includir�g logs, branches, stLUnps,
fiY�u�od, or other oak material which has nat been debarksd or free of hazard
as deteYmi.ned by the Forester .
104.06. II�VII�TIC�tY, ��'TCN AI�ID II�VESIZGA'�I�T
1. The Forester or agent thexeof may inspect all premises and places within
the City as often as deemed apprapriate to determine whether ariy condition
described in either Sec�tion 104.04 or 104.05 of this Chapter exists thereon.
. . The Forester shall
i.rivestigate all report.ed incidents of disea_sed trees.
104.08. P�lIt6 FCdt REI�DVAI, OF II��7C� � CH2 WvOD6
1. If the infect�ed tree is located on private propeity, the Forester shall send
a written notification ar�d prescription to the owner of said praperty. It shall
be the abligation of the pro�erty awner to carty aut the prescribed abatement
prooedure(s) within thirty (30) davs froan the date of receipt of
the notification unless a written varianc�e is granted by the Forester �eeat�se
If the awner req_uests the City or fails to
follcyw the prescription within the designated time period, the Forester shall
n�tify the p�aperty vwryex by mail that the Ci will
oo�tract for the abatement of the public ra�sanoe, namely the diseased or dead
tree and/or wuod in question. Zhe Forester shall then pYnoeed to comxact for
tY�e prescribed abatc�nent prooech�re.s as soon as Possible ar�d shall z�eport to the
City Clerk all chazges resultitxJ f�can the abatement pr�ooedur�s carried aut on
such private prc�erty. 7t�e City Clerk shall list all such c�es along with
a City �n�n��trative oost against each separate lot or paroel by Sept�r 15
of each year as special asses.sments to be oollected
Page 2 - Ordir�anoe No.
rl •;
oo�nericiryg with the follvwing year's taxes. Ar.�ninistrative oosts of $25.00 for
each lot of paroel shall be added to each assessment.
2. In the case of baul�vard trees, defined as a tree ctt�awirig within a street
ric�t-of�a-ay, notioes will be mailed to the vwner of the abuttir�g propezty as
previausly described in Sec.,tion 104.08.01.
. HC�a�eVPx,
,
° the City shall abate ar►y diseased boulevard
tree at no cost to the property vwner. If the proQerty vwner desires, the City
will replace the tree with a bare root selection on the awners praperty in the
vicinity of the remaved tree.
104.09. PROGli�M REJOCl2D6
(
The Forester shall keep aocurate records of the Shade Tree Disease Control
Program and subanit fi�ie-�eeessa�Y anY required reports to the Minnesota
C.ca�unissioner of Agriculture . .
PASSID AND AD�FI'ED BY Zi� CITY aC7CR�TCIL OF Zi� CITY OF FRIDLEX ZHIS L1AY OF
. 1989
A'1'PFS'I':
m r• • « �•
First Readinq: August 28, 1989
second Reaaing:
Publication:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
CITY OF FRIDLBY
K$MO RANDIII�
/" .
TO: 1PILLIAM W. HIIRNB, CITY MANAGER ()I ��
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIHYL� FINANCS DIRECTOR
SQBJECT: LIQQOR CITY CODE CHANGES
DATE: AUGUST 29, 1989
0
Changes were made in the following chapters to bring them into
compliance with the State 5tatutes.
Chapter 602 Beer Licensing Section 602.09 -- No sale on Sunday
between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. (previously 12:00
noon). No sale between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on days Monday
through Saturday (previously any other day). No sale on Christmas
Day, December 25 or Thanksgiving Day were added.
Chapter 603 Intoxicatinq Liquor Section 603.11 -- No sale on
Sunday between 1:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. on Mondays (previously
12:00 midnight on Sunday). No sale between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.
on days Monday through Saturday (previously any weekday). No sale
on Christmas Day, December 25 or Thanksgiving Day were added.
Chapter 605 Intoxicatinq Liwor -- Clubs Section 605.13.1 and
605.13.2 -- No sale between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.
on Mondays (previously midnight Sunday). No sale on Christmas Day,
December 25 and Thanksgiving Day were added.
Chapter 606 Intoxicatinq Liquors Conqressionallv Chartered
Veterans' Organizations, Section 606.11 -- No sale between the
hours of 1:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. on Mondays (previously 12:00
midnight on Sunday). No sale between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on
days Monday through Saturday (previously any weekday). No sale on
Christmas Day, December 25 and Thanksgiving Day were added.
ORDINANCE NO.
!►N ORDINANCB
CODE, CHAPTER
BY AMENDING
REQIIIRED
RECODIFYING THE FRIDL$Y CITY
602, BI�ITITLED ��BEER LICENSING��
B$CTION 602.09.1, LICENSEB
The City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota,
does hereby ordain as follows:
602.09. LICENSES REQUIRED
1. Closing Hours
No sale of beer shall be made on any Sunday between the hours of
1:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. No sale shall be made between
the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on �� ^�'�°Y days Mondav
through Saturday. No sale shall be made on December 24 after
8:00 p.m., on Christmas Day, December 25 or Thanksaiving Day.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY TAE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
• ',
�
oRnix�xca xo.
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING TH8 FRIDLEY CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 603, ENTITLED ��INTOBICATING
LIQUOR��, BY AMENDZNG SECTION 603.11.1, HOIIRS
OF OPERATION
The City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota,
does hereby ordain as follows:
603.11. HOURS OF OPERATION
1. No sale of intoxicating liquor shall be made between the hours
of 1:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. on Sunday, nor between "•^^ TM�a^ "�''�
1:00 a.m. �-� and 8:00 a.m on Mondays. No sale shall
be made between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on °^�, •.,°°La,�r
days Monday through Saturdav. No sale shall be made after 8:00
p.m. on December 24, on Christmas Dav December 25 or Thanksaivinq
D�.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading
Publication:
7
oRnixAxc$ rro.
AN ORDINANCE RBCODIFYING THB FRIDLEY CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 605, BNTITLED "INTO%2CATIN(i
LIQIIOR -- CLIIBB�� BY �MENDING 8$CTION 605.13.1,
605.13.2, RESTRICTIONS
The City Council of the city of Fridley, Anoka county,Minnesota,
does hereby ordain as follows:
605.13 RESTRICTIONS
1. No license or other person shall consume or display or allow
consumption or display of intoxicating liquor between the hours of
1:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. on Sunday nor between the hours of �,3-:-88
1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on Mondays.
2. No sale shall be made between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00
a.m. on any weekday, Monday through Saturday inclusive. No sale
shall be made on December 24 after 8:00 p.m., on Christmas Dav,
December 25 and Thanksqiving Day. All licensees shall be closed
to the public starting not later than 1:30 a.m. until the time
herein provided as permissible for sales, consumption or display.
No person other than employee shall be permitted within such
establishments during the closed periods.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF . 1989.
WILLZAM J. NEE MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publications:
E�
ORDINANC$ �i0.
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYINt3 THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE� CHAPTER 606, BIdTITLED ��INTO%ICATIN(3
LIQDORB, CONGRESSIONAI,LY CHARTERED VETERANB�
ORGANIZATIONB�� BY l�MENDING 8$CTION 606.11.1�
HOIIRS OF OPERATION
The City Council of the city of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota,
does hereby ordain as follows:
606.11. HOURS OF OPERATION
1. No sale of intoxicating liquor shall be made between the hours
of 1:00 a.m. and 1Ot00 a.m. on Sunday, nor between
1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on Mondays. No sale shall be
made between the hours of 1: 00 a. m. and 8: 00 a. m on �• ..,°°ya ",
days Mondav through Saturdav. No sale shall be made after 8:00
p.m. on December 24., on Christmas Day December 25 __and
Thanksgivinq Day.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989-
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
0
�
CZTY OF FRIDLEY
1� B M O R 7\ l�i D � ld
� �
�LEMO TO: 1fZLLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY Ml�NAGER, AND CITY COIII�iCIL �
�ROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SIIBJECT: FZNAL ABSEBSMENT ROLL FOR TSE 1989 BERVICE
CONNECTIONS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1989
The lateral charges made under this assessment roll are made under
the authority provided in Ordinance No. 113 and under Resolution
No. 86-1962. Each of the properties has connected to City water
or sewer without having previously paid a lateral charge.
These lateral assessments are computed using today's average
lateral charges.
All property owners involved in this assessment roll have signed
agreements agreeing to the principal of these lateral charges.
The assessment will be spread over a fifteen-year (15) period with
an interest rate of eight (8) per cent each year on the unpaid
principal.
RP/ms
1
10A
it880LIITION �TO. - 1989
RESOLIITION CONFIRKIIdG 71BSBBBlIENT FOR 1989 BBWER
LPITBRPILB, �T$R I+�TBR�1L8, 11ND 88RVZCE CONNSCTIONS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers
heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose,
calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the
1989 88WER LPIT$RALB, �TBR LATERALS, l�TD
8ERV2CE CONNECTIONS
� in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel
of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has
prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements
in duplicate showinq the proper description of each and every
lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the
amount calculated against the same.
2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this
Council would meet in regular session at this time and place
to pass on the proposed assessment.
3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing
been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested,
and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons
to present their objections, if any, to such proposed
assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have
been filed, except
4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed
and altered as follows:
5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels
of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified was and is specially benefited by the
1989 8$AER I.�TBRALB, �TBR Ll1TERALB liND
BBRVICB CONNECTIOldB
in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the
description of each lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that
said amount so set out is hereby levied aqainst each of the
respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described.
�
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1989
6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected
is affirmed, adopted and confirmed, and the sums fixed and
named in said proposed assessment as altered, nodified, and
corrected, with the changes and alterations herein above made,
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special
assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land
respectively.
7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, shall be
certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and
shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for
1989 BEWER LATER!►L8, wliTER Ll�►TERALS, l�ND
BERVICE COI�TNECTIONS
8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of
land shall bear interest from the date hereto until the same
have been paid at the rate of eight (8) per cent per annum.
9. Such assessment shall be payable in fifteen (15) annual
installments payable on the first day of January in each year,
beginning in the year 1990, and continuing until all of said
installments shall have been paid, each installment to be
collected with taxes collectible during said year by the
County Auditor.
10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the
office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified
statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the
amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January
in each year.
PASSED AND lrDOPTED HY THE CITY COUI�ICIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989
11ZLLI� J. NEE - l�IAYOR
]1TTEST :
BHIRLEY A. HA!►BALA - CITY CLERIC
10B
11
CITY OF FRIDLEY
I�I E I�I O R!� 1�T D � K
� �,
liEMO TO: 11ILLIU'I 1f . BIIRNS, CITY l�TAGER, �ND CITY G'ODNCIL Ll►
?ROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINIRNCB DIRECTOR
BQBJECT: FINAL lr88E88MENT ROLL FOR 11!►TER� 8liNITARY BERER i
BTORM BEWER PROJECT NO. 183
DATE: BEPTEMBER 1, 1989
Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer Project No. 183 involved the
construction of water and sanitary sewer services and a storm sewer
system on University Avenue West Service Drive from 83rd Avenue to
500 feet north.
r
The two properties to be assessed petitioned to have the work done.
Thus the assessment will be divided equally between Northwestern
Orthopaedic Surgeons, P.A. and William Barbush and William Bartram.
The cost to each will be $19,363.40, with the total cost being
$38,726.80. The costs will be assessed at eight (8�) per cent
interest over a twenty (20) year period.
RDP/mms
11A
RE80LIITZON NO. - 1989
REBOLLTTION CONFZRKZI�IG �BSEBB1dSIdT FOR RATBR, SANITARY
BB�ER i BTORM 881BR IliPAOV81iEIiT 'PROJ$CT NO. 183
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers
heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose,
calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the
1[ATER, SANITARY BEWER i BTORM BEWER
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 183
in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel
of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has
prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements
in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every
lot, piece, or p�rcel of land to be specially assessed and the
amount calculated against the same.
2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this
Council would meet in regular session at this time and place
to pass on the proposed assessment.
3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing
been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested,
and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons
to present their objections, if any, to such proposed
assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have
been filed, except
4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed
and altered as follows:
None
5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels
of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified was and is specially benefited by the
WATER, SANITARY SEWER i BTORM BEWER
ZMPROVEMENT BROJECT I10. 183
in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the
description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and
that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of
the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein
described.
17
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1989
6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and
names in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and
corrected with the changes and alterations herein above made,
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special
assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land
respectively.
7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be
certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and
shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for
IIATER, 8ANITliRY BEWER i BTORM BEWER
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 183
8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece or parcel of land
shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have
been paid at the rate of eight (8�) per cent per annum.
9. Such assessment shall be payable in twenty (20) annual
installments payable on the first day of January in each year,
beginning in the year 1990, and continuing until all of said
installments shall have been paid, each installment to be
collected with taxes collectible during said year by the
County Auditor.
10. The City Clerk is hereby directe�3 to make up and file in the
office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified
statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the
amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January
in each pear.
PA88ED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COQATCIL OF TSE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989
1fILLIl�M J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
BHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERR
11B
CITY OF FRIDLEY
xBxORl1�TDIIM
�
1LEK0 TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CZTY lIANAGER, l�ND CITY COIINCIL �
�
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINl1NCE DIRECTOR
SIIBJECT: FINAL ABBE88MENT ROLL FOR �TER, SANITARY SEWER
i STORM BEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 188
DATE: BEPTEMBER 1, 1989
Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 188
involved the Northco Business Park Plat. This project was for the
installation of water�mains, sanitary sewer and storm sewers from
73rd Avenue on Northco Drive.
The total amount for this assessment is $236,548.51. The work done
was petitioned for and will be assessed at eight (8) per cent for
fifteen (15) years in accordance with the development agreement
between the developer (Fridley Business Center Partnership) and the
City.
1
12
it880LOTZON �i0. - 1989
12A
RBBOLIITIO�I CO�illRl�il�iQ �8BE88MSIdT FOR wATER, B!►NITARY
881IER i BTOItK BEwSR Zl[PROVEKEDTT PROJECT NO. 188
BE IT RESOL�7ED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the enqineers
heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose,
calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the
�TSR, B7�iITl1RY BE*SR ic BTORM BEWER
I1�IPROV8K8I�iT PROJECT IdO. 188
, in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel
of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has
prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements
in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every
lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the
amount calculated against the same.
2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this
Council would meet in regular session at this time and place
to pass on the proposed assessment.
3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing
been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested,
and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons
to present their objections, if any, to such proposed
assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have
been filed, except
4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed
and altered as follows:
5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels
of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified was and is specially benefited by the
•!►TBR, SANITARY B$l1ER i BTORM BEWER
2lIPROV8M8ZTT PROJBCT �10. 188
in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the
description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and
that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of
the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein
described.
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1989
6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and
names in said proposed assessment as altered, aodified, and
corrected with the chanqes and alterations herein above made,
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special
assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land
respectively.
7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be
certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and
shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for
R]�lTBR, BAiiIT]�RY 6811EA i BTORI�I SEWER
II�IPROVBKSNT PROJECT lTO. 188
8. The amounts assessed aqainst each lot, piece or parcel of land
shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have
been paid at the rate of eight (8) per cent per annum.
9. Such assessment shall be payable in fifteen (15) annual
installments payable on the first day of January in each year,
beginning in the year 1990, and continuing until all of said
installments shall have been paid, each installment to be
collected with taxes collectible during said year by the
County Auditor.
10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the
office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified
statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the
amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January
in each year.
PASSED 11ND ADOPTED BY T8E CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989
wZLLI� J . NEE - 1riAYOR
l�TTEST:
BHIRI.$Y A. Hl�APALl� - CITY CLERIC
126
15
CITY O! TRIDLEY
xsxoa�►�DIII�I
13
O TO: •ILLZlhtd w. 8IIRN8, CZTY 1�L7i1N]1GBR, 11ND CITY CODliCIL :"n �
ILEK 4N
tit0?I: RICBARD D. PRIBYL, lIN�lCB DIRBCTOR
BIIBJL�CT : lINAL 7188EBB!ffiI�IT AOLL FOR BTREBT ZKPROVEMEI�1'P PROJECT
BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2(P11RT8 !1, 8, i C)
D!►TE: 6EPTEZ�iBER 1, 1989
' On the attached paqes you will find the Final Assessment Roll for
the Street Improvement Project Street 1988 - 1& 2(Parts A, B, &
C) . The total cost of Street 1988 - 1& 2(Parts A, B, & C) is
$1,173,654.48.
Listed below is the breakdown of the project, what it involved, and
a summary af the assessable costs.
PART A:
RICE CREEK ROAD ALIGNliENT - T. H. 65 TO CENTRAL AVENDE
This assessment involved qrading, stabilized base, hot-mix
bituminous mat, concrete curb and qutter, sidewalks, water and
sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, landscaping, lighting,
and signals. This work was petitioned by the property owners
affected.
Northwest Raquet, Swim, & Health Club $199,500.00
Moore Lake Shopping Center 399,000.00
Shorewood Plaza Shoppinq Center 66,500.00
Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority 393,858.43
These costs will be assessed in equal annual installments at nine
(9) per cent interest over thirteen (13) years. Payments will
begin in 1991.
EAST SATELLITE FZRE BTATION
This improvement was for the Parking Lot at the Satellite Fire
Station. The cost for this is $14,017.87 and will be paid for by
�the Satellite Fire Station.
�BaORNE RO!►D BI10E PlrTH
This improvement was for repairing the bike path just East of
University Avenue on Osborne Road. The total cost for this is
$3,744.74 and will be paid for from the Overlay Fund.
13A
63RD l�VBNIIE !►ND RICS CRBBIC ROliD
This improvement was for additional work on the sanitary sewer
system on 63rd Avenue and Rice Creek Road. The total cost for this
is $31,557.44 and will be paid for from the Sewer Fund.
DRIV81fl�YS
Driveway construction in the amount of $13,496.31 was also a part
of this project. These costs will be paid from the escrows
deposited with the City.
PART B
6400 CENTRAL AVENIIE
This assessment consists of extending Storm Sewer Service at 6400
Central Avenue. The work was done by petition from Mr. Frank
Kitterman and Ms. Sandra Sunde.
Actual cost of Improvement is $14,600.00.
Total cost to be assessed is $12,200.00 at nine and one half (9
1/2) per cent interest over fifteen (15) years per petition.
Storm Sewer Escrow applied to this part of project is $1,490.17.
Remainder of $909.83 to be paid from the Storm Sewer Fund.
PART C
SEARS SIIRPLOS PARICING LOT
This assessment consisted of relocating the entrance to the parking
lot of the Sears Surplus Property, installing catch basins, and
overlaying the parking lot. Shorewood Plaza Partners petitioned
to have the work done and agreed to the assessment cost.
Total Cost of the Assessment is $37,379.69.
Total cost will be assessed at eight (8) per cent interest for ten
(10) years per petition.
OVERVIEW OF l�BSE88!►BLS PORTION:
TOTAL COBT TO BE AB8888ED FOR BTREET Il�[PROVEKENT PROJECT NO. STREET
1988 — 1 ic 2(PARTS !�, 8, i� C) IS 8714.579.69.
TSE ]1KOIINT TO BE CERTIFZ$D IN 1989 IS 812.200.00 FOR pART B.
TSZS 71I�lOIINT 1/ILL BB 1188868ED OVBR FIFTBBN (15 ) Y8l�R8 71T �TINE l�TD
ONB 8!►LF ( 9 1/2 ) PER CB1dT I�ITBREST BBR P$TITION. PI\RT C IS FOR
S37 , 37 9. 69 !!ND 11ILL BB 11BSBSSED OVER TEN (10 ) YEl�RS 11T BIGHT ( 8)
P8R C$NT II�1T$REBT.
THE lil�lOIINT OF 5665,000.00 wILL B$ CBRTZFIBD I�1 1990 P$R fiGREEMENT.
THIS �OIII�IT wILL BB l�BS$88$D OVSR THZRTBBN (13 ) Y8l�R8 !►T IiINE ( 9)
BSR CENT ZIdTEREBT IN EQIIl�L 1�iNNIIl�iL I�iBTALLI+IENTB.
2
1 '
RESOLIITION NO. — 1989
RESOLIITION CVNFIRIrIZNG lrBSBBBMEIdT FOR 8TR$ET
IMPROPEMENT PROJECT NO. BTREET 1988 — 1 i� 2
(PART I►)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers
heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose,
calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the
STREET ZMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART A)
in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel
of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has
prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements
in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every
lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the
amount calculated against the same.
2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this
Council would meet in regular session at this time and place
to pass on the proposed assessment.
3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing
been apen to inspection and copying by all persons interested,
and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons
to present their objections, if any, to such proposed
assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have
been filed, except
4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed
and altered as follows:
5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels
of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified was and is specially benefited by the
BTREET ZMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART A)
in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the
description of each lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that
said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the
respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described.
Paqe 2- Resolution No. - 1989
6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected
is affirmed, adopted and confirmed, and the eums fixed and
named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and
corrected, with the changes and alterations herein above made,
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special
assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land
respectively.
7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, shall be
certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and
shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for
STREET ZMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1988 - 1 h 2
(PART A)
8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of
land shall bear �nterest from the date hereto until the same
have been paid at the rate of nine (9) per cent per annum.
9. Such assessment shall be payable in thirteen (13) annual
installments payable on the first day of January in each year,
beginning in the year 1991, and continuing until all of said
installments shall have been paid, each installment to be
collected with taxes collectible during said year by the
County Auditor.
10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the
office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified
statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and
the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of
January in each year.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY TAE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF r 1989
WILLIAM J. NEE - lSAYOR
11TTEST :
BBZRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERR
13C
J�
RBSOLOTION �TO. - 1989
�
RSSOLDTION CO�TFZRKZ�TG 1168SSSK81iT �'OR BTRB$T
ZI�LPF•OVEK$Z1T PROJ$CT �i0. 8TR8ET 1988 - 1 i 2
( PlIRT 8 )
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers
heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose,
calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the
STREET II�IPROVEMENT PROJ$CT NO. BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2
( Pl�RT B )
in said City aqainst every assessable lot, piece, or parcel
of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has
prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements
in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every
lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the
amount calculated against the same.
2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this
Council would meet in regular session at this time and place
to pass on the proposed assessment.
3. Said proposed assessment has at all times
been open to inspection and copying by all
and an opportunity has been given to all
to present their objections, if any,
assessment, or to any item thereof, and
been filed, except
since its filing
persons interested,
interested persons
to 6uch proposed
no objections have
4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed
and altered as follows:
5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels
of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified was and is specially benefited by the
BTREBT I1�iPROVE1�tENT PROJBCT �TO. BTRBET 1488 - 1 i 2
( P1�1RT B )
in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the
description of each lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that
said amount so set out is hereby levied aqainst each of the
respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described.
13D
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1989
6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected
is affirmed, adopted and confirmed, and the sums fixed and
named in said proposed assessment as altered, sodified, and
corrected, with the changes and alterations herein above made,
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special
assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land
respectively.
7. Said assessment so affinaed, adopted, and confirmed, shall be
certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and
shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for
BTREET II�IPROVBMENT PROJ$CT 1d0. STRBBT 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART B)
8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of
land shall bear interest from the date hereto until the same
have been paid at the rate of nine and one half (9 1/2) per
cent per annum.
9. Such assessment shall be payable in fifteen (15) annual
installments payable on the first day of January in each year,
beginning in the year 1990, and continuing until all of said
installments shall have been paid, each installment to be
collected with taxes collectible during said year by the
County Auditor.
10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the
office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified
statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and
the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of
January in each year.
PASSED 71ND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF TSE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIB
Dl1Y OF , 1989
�ILI�Zl�ld J. ITEE - ILAYOR
71TT$ST:
BHIRLEY A. H7U�P�iL�i - CITY CLBRR
13�
35
RESOLIITION NO. - t989
RESOLIITION CONFIRMING 1188E88MENT FOR BTREET
ZMPROVEPiENT PROJECT NO. BTREET 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART C)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Clerk has with.the assistance of the engineers
heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose,
calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the
BTREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. BTREET 1988 - 1 i� 2
(PART C)
in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel
of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has
prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements
in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every
lat, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the
amount calculated against the same.
2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this
Council would meet in regular session at this time and place
to pass on the proposed assessment.
3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing
been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested,
and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons
to present their objections, if any, to such proposed
assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have
been filed, except
4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed
and altered as follows:
5. This Council finds that each af the lots, pieces, or parcels
of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified was and is specially benefited by the
BTREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART C)
in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and
modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the
description of each lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that
said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the
respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described.
13F
36
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1989
6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected
is affirmed, adopted and confirmed, and the sums fixed and
named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and
corrected, with the changes and alterations herein above made,
are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special
assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land
respectively.
7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, shall be
certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and
shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. STREET 1988 - 1 i 2
(PART C)
8. The amounts ass�ssed against each lot, piece, or parcel of
land shall bear interest from the date hereto until the same
have been paid at the rate of eight (8) per cent per annum.
9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual
installments payable on the first day of January in each year,
beginning in the year 1990, and continuing until al� of said
installments shall have been paid, each installment to be
collected with taxes collectible during said year by the
County Auditor.
10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the
office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified
statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and
the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of
January in each year.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COQNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989
wILLZl+M J. NEE - ltAYOR
I►TTEBT :
BHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CZTY CLERR
�3G
37
CITY OF lAIDLEY
pI.�liTZ1ZI�TQ COIrIIrII88ION 1�BTZNG, 11IIGIIST 30, 1989
sAi.� TO ORDER •
Chairperson Betzold called the Auqust 30, 1989, Planninq Commission
meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
�OLL CALL•
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Others Present:
Donald Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Alex Barna, Paul
Dahlberq, Bradley Sielaff
Sue Sherek
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
�PPROVAL OF AUGUST 16�. 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
O�I TION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to approve the
August 16, 1989, Planning Commiss�on minutes as written.
QPON A�ICE VOTE, ALL VOTING 71YE, CHAZRPERBON BETZOLD DECLARED T8E
I�IOTION CJ►RRIED IINANZMOIIBLY.
1, CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS
Ms. McPherson stated the proposed landscape standards are for
adoption in industrial and commercial districts and will
standardize City requirements for developers and businesses. When
developers come in with their site plans, etc., the City must tell
them what is required. There are currently three lines in the
ordinance to cover landscapinq and screening. This language is
taken from a proposed ordinance for Champlin. The proposed
standards need to be worked on to see if they match some of the
other requirements, ie. how much is required for parking vs. how
much is left over for green areas.
Mr. Barna asked if staff had considered a type of parkinq lot paver
which would allow the qrass to qrow through the block.
Mr. Dahlberg stated the concrete block has been tried in this part
of the country but doesn't seem to do that well. They can work
where the grass does not get as much trampling. The problem is
that in the winter the qrass will not survive if it is plowed,
because the frost will penetrate deeper. If there is a lawn area
that is exposed in the winter, the frost will qo six to seven feet
deep. With a snow cover, the frost depth will be more like three
feet and the grass will survive.
14
PL,1�INZNG COMMISSION l�tBETING� llUGUBT 30, 1989 PAGE 214A
Mr. Barna stated he was considering the times when an industry does
not need as much parking as is required by the City code and that
this could be an acceptable alternative.
Mr. Dahlberg stated some cities use "proof of parking". If the
property owner or business can show that they have only a few
employees, but the code requires 25 parking spaces, they can show
they will not need that many spaces. A portion of the site can
then be set aside for proof of parking so that it can be added if
needed.
Ms. McPherson stated several ordinance amendments would be coming
through the commission. Councilmember Billinqs is preparing
language about a reduction in the parking stall size, and she and
� Ms. Dacy had discussed adding language concerning the nwnber of
employees and employee parking needed.
Mr. Dahlberg stated proof of parking is a bit peculiar and may not
want to use the interpretation of the parking. A building could
be used as a warehouse requiring few employees and few parking
places. However, in the future, it could become a manufacturing
facility. That is why there must be proof that there is parking
space available if needed for a different use.
Mr. Barna stated this is what is done here through proving there
is a certain amount of square feet. This could be done through a
special use permit. A business may not the amount of parking as
required by code, but should have the space available for
additional parking if needed.
Mr. Dahlberg stated you can run into difficulties when,you start
to sway. Everybody needs to understand that as a manufacturing
facility so many parking spaces are required. However, there
should be potentially a means for a development to conform to
landscaping by not putting the entire site into bituminous when
they are not going to use it. He would like to incorporate a
statement into the landscape ordinance that says a business may
need to pave this area later, but in the meantime, the City would
like to see landscape materials. The City can not foresee
everything that will occur but it can allow for less bituminous and
more landscape.
Mr. Barna referred to agenda page iG, D, 3, indicating this
statement should take into consideration the planting season.
Mr. Betzold asked if Ms. McPherson knew how these ordinance guide-
lines conform to what has been required in recent stipulations.
Ms. McPherson stated berming is pretty standard. As far as plant
sizes, which are on page 2, those are what the City requires now
except for coniferous trees which are usually five to six feet
tall. Ms. Dacy and she calculated that in an industrial district
•
pLANNING COMMISSION ME$TZNG. AIIGIIST 30. 1989 PAGE 314B
on a minimum lot, which is 1/2 acres, subtracting that which can
be parked on and allow for setbacks, etc., that leaves
approximately 12� of the lot for qreen space. Eight-eight percent
of the lot can be covered by bituminous. Twenty-five percent for
commercial and industrial may be hiqh unless the City changes its
standard on how it calculates lot coverage. Lot coverage is
currently calculated by building only, not by impervious surface.
Some other municipalities do not require lot coverage. They let
building and parking setbacks determine that. Other cities have
almost a 90� lot coverage for both parking and building. The City
would either have to change setback requirements for parking or
change the percentage to meet current standards. The City could
reduce it to 12$ or leave it at 25�.
Mr. Betzold stated it would be important to look at what the City
already has.
Ms. McPherson stated the Chamber of Commerce has started a new
policy of reviewing City Council and Planning Commission agendas
before the meetings, and they were concerned about how this would
work. There are some things that need to be worked out. Staff is
trying to help developers by presenting them with a set of
standards regarding plant sizes, numbers, etc. This also
incorporates a section which will help preserve existing trees
through a replacement policy which the City does not have now. The
City has no way to require developers to replace a ratio of trees
that are taken out. Staff cannot say that for every 8" tree that
is cut down, it has to be replaced with two trees, because it is
not in the code.
Mr. Betzold asked if the Chamber of Commerce had seen the proposed
ordinance.
Ms. McPherson indicated two persons who are part of the Chamber had
seen the proposed ordinance. One was a representative from
McDonald's came to see what would be done. She did not expect this
item to get started at the public hearing level until next year.
Mr. Betzold stated, as due process, the commission could take a
look at the proposal and see how consistent it is.
Ms. McPherson stated that many times staff has been asked to cut
back on the number of trees. This will help in the future, if
there is not a landscape architect on staff, to have guidelines to
go by.
Mr. Sielaff asked if Ms. McPherson currently looks at plans.
Ms. McPherson stated she did, but without a knowledge of plants
materials, it is difficult to make an objective determination on
the quality of the plants. It is arbitrary. This will help.
pr.�1JNZNa CpMMIggION MBETINQ. l�IIaIIBT 30. 1989 pA�3g 4 14C
Mr. Sielaff asked if staff would look at plans. If so, then the
request would not come before the Planning Commission.
Ms. McPherson stated that not everyone who applies for a building
permit and comes in with a plan is required to come before the
Planning Commission. For those who do not come before the
commission, staff will be able to check off those things that are
required. The language is currently vague and non-specific. Staff
has been very consistent in the last two years in the size of the
trees.
Mr. Dahlberg asked if staff had gone through an evaluation of
landscape ordinances other then Champlin's.
Ms. McPherson stated yes. AZmost all "500" cities have been
called. Champlin's proposed ordinance is the most comprehensive
landscape plan yet seen. Many cities have what Fridley currently
has. Eden Prairie has a comprehensive plan and a shoreline
ordinance.
Mr. Sielaff asked how many cities have instituted a landscape plan
and do not have a professional on staff.
Ms. McPherson stated she did not know how many cities employed
landscape architects.
Mr. Dahlberg stated most cities do. Almost every city he has dealt
with had one landscape architect on staff.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that, as an architect trying to get projects
approved, there are some communities in the metro area that are too
restrictive or too subjective.
Ms. McPherson stated that this language is setting up the number
and standard sizes of trees. It still allows the developers to use
any species they want. A landscape architect can help with proper
placement of plants or providing suggestions for better plants in
an area, but not necessarily following the ordinance requirements.
Mr. Dahlberg recommended that this not be excessive. When a
project is proposed or a developer wants to do a building, the
landscaping is the last thing they want to consider. It is not
necessarily right, but that is just the way it is. Every project
should have something that is going to add to the environment;
however, excessiveness in terms of the requirements does not make
sense.
Mr. Kondrick stated there should be cooperation on the project on
the part of the developers.
Mr. Betzold felt it was better to have written standards. This is
a step in the right direction. There will be criticisms along the
PL•�1�TNING COMMISSION M8$TING, liUGIIBT 30, 1989 PAGE 5 14D
way and there will probably be modifications along the way, but
this is better than what we have now.
Mr. Dahlberg suggested, if someone states they cannot put that much
money into landscaping, the City should be willing to do some
compromising, and say that this is ultimately what the City wants
to have done on the property, and by the time of the occupancy
permit, half should be done and by the next planting season, the
rest should be done. He thought the City should be flexible to a
certain extent, but not forget entirely, and work with the
individual to get the required landscaping done in a reasonable
period of time. However, he did not think this should be part of
the ordinance but it should be an internal policy to be flexible
according to our requirements.
Mr. Sielaff felt this should be keyed into the required process.
Compliance schedules can be put in which require a landscape plan
to be submitted and reviewed. This requires a staff person to do
the review, but this also gets the landscape plan into the process.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that, if a plan is required early enough in the
process, the developer and owner understand that there is a certain
amount of dollars required for the property. For example, in
Plymouth, when a project is submitted, the developer is required
to provide building, site, landscape, and utility plans before it
will go to the Planning Commission; and even though most people
despise working in Plymouth because it is so restrictive, they know
what is required. If staff can require everything before it is
considered, it may help. Many times the Planning Commission is
not working with a lot of information when someone comes before
the Planning Commission in Fridley. If it was outlined that
certain things are required before coming before the Planning
Commission, everyone will understand what is required. This would
not necessarily need to be part of the landscape ordinance, but
should be a part of the ordinance requirements for submittal for
review.
Mr. Betzold stated he would also like to see from the developer,
which staff could get all at once, the developer's timetable and
when the developer plans to install. That way, the City would know
what their priorities are.
Mr. Barna stated, that in the past, there have not been excessive
landscape requirements. When sites have designed a landscape plan,
it has repeatedly occurred that the builders and/or owners wanted
to put money into the buildinq, not trees. If it is in the
ordinance at the pre-planning level, this will not happen.
Mr. Sielaff asked if the City would require an inventory on
existing plants.
Ms. McPherson stated she specifically asked for an inventory from
gLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. �OG08T 30, 1989 PAGE 6 1 4E
Northco, but it is not currently in the code.
Mr. Dahlberg stated an inventory is part of the Plymouth ordinance.
The inventory requires to have so many caliper inches of trees on
the development. If you leave trees on the site, then the caliper
inches of the existinq trees are credited toward required
landscape. Every property is required to have a survey done.
Ms. McPherson stated there is a credit for existing trees. She
will go back to check that those numbers that are in the proposed
ordinance are being requested are consistent with other cities.
Mr. Dahlberg asked about credits for trees and if there is some
formula for retaining existing trees. If a developer retains a
good percentage of existing trees, why would they need to add new
trees? Perhaps adding shrubs would be enough.
Mr. Sielaff stated that many times it is ignorance on the part of
the developer.
Mr. Barna stated there are sites in the City that at one time had
existing trees and that are now bare.
Ms. McPherson stated she will review the proposed ordinance and
will discuss with Ms. Dacy the percentage requirements. Then, it
will come back to the Planning Commission to make sure nothing has
been missed and then go back to the City Council.
Mr. Dahlberg asked about irrigation. He was not sure this was
enough description or explanation.
Ms. McPherson stated irrigation is one of three things the City
does require. One of the issues of irrigation is, if there is
another drought, should we require drought tolerant plants, and how
to enforce the use of irrigation. If it is installed, how can the
City be sure that it will be used?
Mr. Dahlberg asked what would happen if there is a watering ban.
Mr. Barna stated the aquifer level is droppinq. If there is
another drought, it is possible that irrigation will be banned.
Mr. Dahlberg felt the water supply was sufficient. Irrigation does
go back into the soil and will get back into the aquifer. He felt
they could work together. His concern about statement is that it
should be more specific. Does the City require that a developer
irrigate only lawn or landscape materials? Developers can irrigate
sod areas only and shrubs die, which looks worse.
Should the language be more specific?
Mr. Dahlberg also referred to the statement that irrigation shall
be required in all industrial and commercial districts and
�LANNINQ COMMISSION 1�$ETING. �IIGIIST 30, 1989 PAGE � 1 4F
developments with more than three units per building. He asked if
this was residential.
Ms. McPherson stated this was R-3 zoninq. Currently, every
building is commercial and industrial and is required to have
irrigation so that language should be changed to encampass
consistent standards.
Mr. Sielaff stated that many people have their own wells for
irrigation.
Mr. Barna stated this was not forbidden to have a shallow well as
long as the water is not brought into the house and will not run
through the public water system.
Mr. Sielaff stated that if irrigation is required it will take from
the municipal water system. Will this level be significant?
Ms. McPherson stated the technology is changing fast enough that
companies are designi�ng water efficient sprinkler heads that are
designed to conserve water.
Mr. Sielaff stated he could see irrigation as a problem.
Mr. Sielaff stated concerns about erosion control. 1, D, mentions
erosion control, but felt it should be part of a plan. This could
be part of a landscape plan.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that engineering require grading and drainage
plans.
Ms. McPherson stated that grading and drainage plans will specify
where and by what means erosion will be controlled. This is
usually standard practice.
Mr. Dahlberg stated there are grading and drainage plans prepared
by civil engineers. However this is not always done correctly.
Ms. McPherson did not know that this would be the case. She would
say civil engineers are consistent in using those standard.
Mr. Dahlberg stated the language should be something relative to
slope.
Mr. Sielaff also recommended material used.
Mr. Dahlberg stated this should not only incorporate sodding, but
if you are seeding, you need some kind of mulch or mesh, and a
qeneral measure necessary of grading. Engineering is a good source
of information.
2. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE - ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES CHAPTER
BL•�11NINt3 COMMI88ION 1SE$TINt3, fiUGIIST 30. 1989 PAG$ a 14G
Ms. McPherson stated staff is still working with the current
comprehensive plan. Much of what is in the outline included with
the agenda is included in the current plan except that it has been
rearranged and expanded. The wetlands portion has been expanded
to include location. Fridley has the official wetland maps for the
watershed districts: Rice Creek and Six Cities. The City has maps
for Fridley and staff is mapping those wetlands which exist and
which are gone. Staff has also added the regulatory aqencies that
oversee those watersheds. A section was added on air quality. The
current plan does not have an inventory of unique features on
vacant parcels so staff has chosen to inventory those. Staff has
decided to have a section that discusses the various threats that
can occur to the natural resources and which are occurring.
Mr. Sielaff asked why does the City have regulatory functions over
wetlands and air quality, but nothing over water bodies. If staff
is going to look at regulatory functions, groundwater and surface
water should be included. Under threats to resources, he suggested
the inclusion of pollution as a topic and that water pollution be
separated into groundwater and surface water. It is important to
look at what is being impacted and what kind of waste is the
problem.
Ms. McPherson stated that is how staff thought about it.
Mr. 5ielaff felt it should be looked at as how the resources will
be impacted.
Mr. Dahlberg stated it was nice to see this work going on and
thought it is a step forward to look �t all these things.
Mr. Kondrick agreed, and felt it is good to look at specifics
rather than generalities.
Ms. McPherson stated there currently are no policy objectives.
Those will be developed later in the process. Solid waste was not
included because it will be given its own chapter in the
comprehensive plan.
3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
MINUTES OF JULY 10, 1989
Mr. Kondrick stated that on Page 4, there is a motion recommending
to the City Council, through the Planning Commission, that the City
not lease or sell any portion of Edgewater Gardens Park to Redeemer
Lutheran Church for parking purposes. The church is located on
Mississippi Street just east of East River Road. They have a
parking lot to the north and east of the church. Adjacent is the
park, bounded by parking lot on one side, railroad tracks on the
other side. The church wants to expand its parking lot. After
much discussion, the commission's concensus was not to do this
because it would set a precedent and because this is not needed.
PLANNINQ COMMISSION MESTINQ, �DGIIST 30. 1989 PAGE 9 1 4H
Nothing was done by the church to offer other services. There are
no major parkinq problems. The Parks & Recreation Commission is
lookinq for concurrence from this commission.
Mr. Betzold state the park was to provide a place for recreational
purposes. He agreed that if we sell part of the park here, it will
set a precedent.
Mr. Barna also agreed with the recommendation.
Mr. Dahlberg asked for clarification of the statement that the
church is requesting the use of the land but that they really don't
need it.
Mr. Kondrick stated the church said they needed more parking spaces
for some times of the year. He felt the church would like to
expand the church. The Commission asked why, since they have
people going to different services, they could not have more
services. The Commission was told that people would not go to the
service. He stated he was not real sympathetic to this request,
because the church did not make a real attempt to add a service.
There is more to a park than playground equipment. He did not feel
they needed the space. The church can have other services, and
such a decision to give park land could set dangerous precedent.
Mr. Dahlberg asked`if the neighbors were involved.
Mr. Kondrick stated they were and that the bulk said they did not
want changes to the park. The church also contacted the neighbors.
Mr. Dahlberg stated this is a captive neighborhood.
Mr. Kondrick stated this is not a big park either.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, that the Planning
Commission concur with the recommendation of the Parks & Recreation
Commission that the City not lease or sell any portion of Edgewater
Gardens Park to Redeemer Lutheran Church for parking purposes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CSAIRPER.SON BETZOLD DECLARED T8E
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to receive the
minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of July 10,
1989.
IIPON A VOICB VOTB, l�LL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
KOTZON CARRIED IINANII+IOIIBLY.
Mr. Betzold stated this item would be before the City Council on
September 11.
PL�NNINQ COMMISSION MBETING, �UGIIST 30. 1989 PAGE 10 1 41
4. DUMPSTER ORDINANCE UPDATE
Ms. McPherson stated this is an update. The charts included in the
agenda indicate the places that are multi family, industrial
businesses, commercial businesses that have dumpsters, whether or
not they have screening, and if so, what type? The information was
presented to the City Council prior to the meeting and has been
tabled until it can be scheduled before the Council conference
meeting. The City's Public Works department has been instructed
to screen the City's dumpsters prior to this item going back for
a public hearing.
Mr. Betzold asked what conclusions were drawn as a result of this
information.
Staff concluded that 69$ of establishments surveyed are not
screened.
Mr. Barna stated that those who had conformed had a special use
permit or variance.
Ms. McPherson stated that the current code requires screens. Based
on this information, the City could send out many letters notifying
of code violations.
Mr. Dahlberg asked what conclusions were drawn.
Ms. McPherson stated this was presented as an information item and
asked for direction. Some recommendations were made. One is that
the City screens its own dumpsters, look at recycling containers,
ask for clarification of screening material types, in addition to
several other recommendations and/or directions. All staff could
conclude was that no one is complying except those with a special
use permit or a variance or if they are required to keep inside.
Basically 69� are not complying with current code let alone if we
adopt a new code.
Mr. Dahlberg stated it is difficult from the standpoint of
enforcement.
Ms. McPherson stated that the Chamber of Commerce has reviewed the
proposed dumpster ordinance. In a letter to their people there was
a question if it also included the top of the dumpster. Ms. Dacy
stated it did not, that four sides are to be screened, not the top.
pLANNING COMMZSSION MEETING, A�GIIST 30, 1989 � PAGE �1 1 4J
ION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to adjourn the
meeting.
IIPON A VOICE VOT$, l�LL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON 8$TZOLD D$CLARED THE
JIINE 21, 1989, PLANNING CO1rIIdI88ION 1�BTING lIDJOIIRNED !1T 8 s 45 P.ld.
Respectfully submitted,
, �'
��'-Zs �,� � / (1-� ���, - � %
� �
Lavonn Cooper �-' '
Recording Secretary
14K
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING, �UGUST 22, 1989
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Barna called the Auqust 22, 1989, Appeals Commission
meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Alex Barna, Larry Kuechle, Jerry Sherek,
Renneth Vos
Members Absent: Diane Savage
Others Present: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Keith Poppenhagen, 7570 Hwy. 65
Don Selger, 2389-132 Ave. NW, Coon Rapids
Bill Hartman, 7691 Old Central Avenue
Ken Tigue, 1141 Lynde Drive
Barbara Tigue, 1141 Lynde Drive
Sherman Hanson, 7691 Old Central Avenue
Peter Ludwag, 617-81st Avenue NE,
Spring Lake Park
Thomas Larson, 362-57th Avenue NE
David Larson, 360-57th Avenue NE �
APPROVAL OF AUGUST 1 1989 APPEAIS COMMISSION MINUTES:
OM TION by Mr. Sherek, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the August
1, 1989, Appeals Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST VAR #89-14 BY ASHLAND
OIL COMPANY IRAPID OIL):
Pursuant to Section 205.14.03.A of the Fridley City Code to
reduce the required minimum lot area from 20,000 sq. ft. to
16,942 sq. ft.; and pursuant to Section 205.14.03.C.(2).(b)
of the Fridiey City Code, to reduce the side yard setback on
a corner lot from 35 feet to 15 feet, to allow the
construction of a new oil changing facility, on Lot 1, 2, and
3, Block 6, City View Addition, the same being 5701 University
Avenue N.E.
Ms. McPherson stated that variance request, VAR #89-14, had been
withdrawn prior to the meetinq. This item will be going throuqh
a rezoning.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 2
2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST VAR �k89-16 BY KENNETH
A. TIGUE•
Pursuant•to Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code
to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 30 feet to
allow the construction of a new home on Lot 10, Block 2,
Riverwood Park, the same being 7110 Riverwood Drive N.E.
Ms. McPherson stated the variance request was being made to reduce
the front yard setback from 35 feet to 30 feet to allow
construction of a new home on Lot 10, Block 2, of Riverwood Park.
This was a fairly recent plat and the site of the former Riverwood
Elementary School. It was located in an R-1, Single Family, zoning
district. There exists a 35-foot drainaqe and utility easement at
the back of the lot, and the rear property line was approximately
in the center of this drainage easement. This easement was more
stringent than the rear yard setback required by Code. The
petitioner has several options in addition to the variance, all of
which have been discu�sed with the Engineering and Planning staffs.
If the house were to meet the 35 foot setback, the house would have
to be shifted back about 5 feet. The petitioner could then vacate
the easement in two ways. A line could be drawn across the rear
of the lot to vacate 5 feet of the easement. They could also
vacate the easement in such a way to follow the boundary of the
rear of the house. The petitioner could also file a letter of
indemnity for any damage to the house if the City needed to go in
and do any repair work, or they could build a smaller house with
a smaller footprint.
The petitioner has requested a variance for 5 feet. Approximately
5 feet of the southwest of the garage would encroach into the front
yard setback. It was pointed out in the staff report that the 30
foot setback from the right of way was approximately equal to the
35 foot on the adjacent lots. This was due to the curve in the
road when the road was platted.
Staff recommended the Appeals Commission deny the variance on the
basis that the petitioner has three alternatives that would allow
him to meet Code.
Mr. Barna stated that the building footprint appeared to be 43
feet. If you follow further the drive easement from the front and
the drainage in the rear, this seems to be a short area for a
house. He questioned if a house could be built within an area that
small. Principally, the developer, the HRA and the City came up
with the finished lots. He found it hard to find against the
petitioner.
He did not think one could fit a house on this lot that was
compatible with this neighborhood.
Ms . McPherson stated that two lots to the south and west of the
14L
14M
APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 3
petitioner there was a 2-story homes with a tuck-under garage. The
qarage does not come forward as far as the one proposed. It was
possible to build a house with a smaller footprint that would be
compatible with the neiqhborhood.
Dr. Vos stated the reason for a front yard setback was to allow for
off street parking without encroaching on public property, and the
second reason was for the line of sight. It was difficult for line
of sight when there was a curve in the road. If you look at off
street parking, the garage was pretty close and the residents will
have to come out at an angle any how.
Ms. McPherson stated there have been no variances for this area.
OTION by Mr. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:45 P.M.
Mr. Bill Hartman stated he came to City Engineer and Planning
Department to solve problems with this particular lot. Mr. Tigue
has lived in Fridley for 31 years and wanted to remain here. It
was difficult to find a lot in Fridley. He chose this lot because
it fit his idea of a good lot for him. According to the elevations
for the ponding area in the rear of the house, the Appeals
Commission can see that a 2-story house would put the basement
below the level of the pond. A split was better suited. The house
was pushed back as far as possible, and the petitioner then asked
for the City's solution to the problem because the petitioner
originally asked to vacate the easement to the back. They
suggested the variance because it would not block sight lines and
felt parking would not be a problem. The petitioner was not
satisfied with the long process of vacating the easement which
would be difficult in platting out and setting up on the deed.
Another option was to cantilever the back of the house over the
easement and give the City the right to destroy the back of the
house if repairs were necessary. That left the owner too
vulnerable. Mr. Tigue did not feel comfortable with ponding area
there and a house with a full basement. The lot was well suited
for a split, and the petitioner was surprised at the denial of the
Planning Department.
Mr. Barna asked if there had been any playing with the design of
the house.
Mr. Hartman stated they had tried. Mr. and Mrs. Tigue decided to
have few stairs because this was intended for a home after
retiring. Mr. Hartman felt that the curve created a hardship on
this property. It was a unique situation. Another area of concern
was that the petitioner had talked with the neighbors, had
explained what they were trying to accomplish, had put preliminary
14N
APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 4
stakes on the property, and they have had no objections from any
of the neighbors. The stakes which were placed were as accurate
as they could get.
Dr. Vos asked if a deck was proposed at the back.
Mr. Hartman said a deck was proposed, but it would be to the side
of the house.
Dr. Vos stated a deck to the rear would be acceptable, but if it
was enclosed, does that affect the easement.
Ms. McPherson stated she was unsure and would have to check with
City Engineer and legal staff. Ms. McPherson stated a deck was
allowed to be built in Riverview Heights that projected into the
easement.
Dr. Vos asked how realistic was it to have the 35 feet to the back.
Was it arbitrary?
Mr. Barna asked if there were figures on water levels and/or the
flood plain.
Mr. Hartman presented a drawing with contour levels. A 2-story
puts it close to the high water mark in the basement level. Most
homes in the area were multi-level with no full basement.
Mr. Kuechle asked what would be wrong with chanqing the easement.
Ms. McPherson stated the issue with vacation was that the process
would be longer than the petitioner would like in order to have
the house built this fall. The vacation process would be
considerably longer than the variance process. There was also the
issue of title and legal description. The vacation of the easement
would impact neighboring properties because the line of
intersection would change on the properties to the east and west.
Mr. Hartman stated there were a number of different ways to solve
the problem to the satisfaction of the owner and the City; and Mr.
Hartman felt he had come up with best solution to the problem.
Mr. Ludwig stated he works with the fire department, and he bought
the lot in November planning to build a 2-story home with a
walkout. When he bought the lot, he did not know about the
easement. When he first decided to build, the fire station had not
been planned on the north end. Now, the City had decided to build
a second satellite fire station, and he decided to purchase a lot
in that area. Mr. Ludwig could not have the walkout basement he
wanted. Therefore, he wanted to sell the lot which was hard to
sell because of the easement. When Mr. Tigue approached him, Mr.
Ludwig did not know about the 35 foot easement. Mr. Ludwig then
decided to buy another lot, thinking he would get his money right
140
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 22, 1989 Pi4GE 5
away. He then received a call that the there were problems and he
now has two lots. Mr. Ludwig still owns the lot in Riverwood Park.
Mr. Tigue is trying to buy the lot. Mr. Ludwig approached the
Planning Department and asked if staff could settle this. Mr.
Ludwig thought staff would approve this. The Appeals Commission
stated they did not like to grant variances on new property. This
was the only lot undeveloped and neiqhbors want a house there. Mr.
Ludwig was told that when the back easement was drawn, the
engineers drew a straight line and Mr. Ludwig questioned if that
easement needed to be that biq. He needed the money as soon as he
could get it out. Mr. Ludwig wanted the process to get going
one way or the other so he could also proceed.
Mr. Tigue stated he was trying to buy the lot. In looking at the
map, he did not see that the variance would be that much of a
problem. He had talked with the neighbors who were anxious to get
a house on the lot. They were not concerned about a 5 foot
encroachment. In response to some of the alternatives, moving the
house further back puts it into the pond area. A 2 story puts it
deeper into the ground. A smaller house would be an insult to
neighborhood. This was a modest home but he felt it would fit
nicely in the neighborhood.
Mr. Barna asked the number of square feet.
Mr. Tigue stated 1220 square feet.
Mr. Kuechle asked if anyone had seen the water there last night
after the rain.
Mr. Barna stated he was trying to visualize where the back yard
would be in relation and felt the water would have come very close
to the back door.
Mr. Sherek stated that the easement was then practical.
Mr. Tigue thought the easement was practical. He felt that going
forward was the way to go.
OM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M.
Mr. Sherek felt that considering the lay of the land, some of the
neighbors that he had talked to, and the ponding, he thought it
would be unwise to move the house back in that area. He would
recommend to the City Council to approve this variance.
Mr. Kuechle stated he would tend to disagree. There are a fair
number of options to reduce the encroachment of 5 feet. He found
14P
APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETZNG, AUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 6
it hard that they couldn't come up with a plan that would fit on
the lot, provide the proper setbacks, and still qet 1200 feet with
a different house plan. Particularly he disaqreed since it was so
recently platted.
Dr. Vos thought there was a hardship due to the easement and the
curvature of the road. If the street were designed differently,
there would not be a problem. He did not what else could be done
there. There was a definite hardship.
Mr. Barna stated he found a hardship with the utility easement in
the way it was originally platted and approved. He did agree with
Mr. Kuechle that there were other designs that could fit. This was
a small footprint area and the petitioner planned to put in a very
nice house. It was easier and a shorter process to ask for a
variance. He would tend to vote in favor.
Dr. Vos asked the longest dimension that could be built on the lot.
Ms. McPherson stated, after measuring the lot and allowing for side
yard setbacks, that approximately 67 feet would be the bigqest
house that could be built across the lot.
OM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to recommend to the City
Council approval of variance request, VAR #89-Z6.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, VOS, SHEREK, AND BARNA VOTING AYE, AND KUECHLE
VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED TIiE MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Barna stated that the minutes of this request would go to
Planning Commission at their next meeting, and to the City Council
on September 11.
Dr. Vos stated the request would have gone to the City Council even
if we had not approved, because staff had recommended denial.
Mr. Hartman asked if the staff had recommended approval, would the
petitioner have been okay.
Mr. Barna stated that was correct.
Dr. Vos stated that, nnfortunately, since staff did not recommend
approval, the City Council must consider. Even if one neighbor had
objected, the City Council would had to review.
3. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #89-15 BY KEITH'S
AUTO BODY LKEITH POPPENHAGEN�,:
Pursuant to Section 214.12.02.E of the Fridley City Code to
reduce the required sign setback in the side property line
from 10 feet to 0 feet, to allow the construction of a free-
standing siqn at 7570 Highway 65 N.E.
i
�
t
unroF
F���
DATE:
TO:
C�11ILMlINITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Auqust 28, 1989 � /e�,•
r�
William Burns, City Manager �
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT:
Variance Request, VAR �89-16
The Appeals Commission voted 3-2 in favor of recommending approval
of the variance request, VAR �89-16, to the City Council. Staff
maintains its position, and recommends that the City Council deny
the variance, VAR #89-16, on the basis that the petitioner has four
other alternatives which would allow him to construct a single
family home and still meet Code.
I�i/dn
M-89-511
�
��
� 14R
� STAFF REPORT �
JIPPEALS DATE s/22/sg
CITY OF PLAN�V(' COM��SSION DATE
FRIDLEY CITY OOI�ICIL DATE �►�►���,�
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITE DATA
SlZE ,
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONNVG
ADJACENT LAND USES
E� ZONNG
UTiJTES
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FXVANCIAL NNPLlCAT10NS
CONFORMANCE TO
C•OMPREhENS11/E PLAN
CONI�'ATBILITY WITH
ADJACENT IRSES � ZONNG
ENVRONMENTAL
t'.ONSDERATIONS
STAFF RECONIMEI�DATION
APPEALS RECOMMENOATION
PLANN�VG COMMISSiON
f�ECONNAENDATION
74S
APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 8
Mr. Barna asked if the billboard was on south property line.
Ms. McPherson stated the billboard was along the south property
line. There were also lilac bushes and other vegetation from the
trailer court.
Mr. Sherek asked if this would only be until the improvements are
made.
Ms. McPherson stated yes, the petitioner would be required to
comply with Sign Code when the landscape improvements are
,, completed.
Mr. Sherek asked why such a long time period was being recommended.
Ms. McPherson stated there was currently uncertainty as to who owns
the property. Mr. Michael Thompson was one of the owners. There
was an issue over whether the bank owns the property, whether Mr.
Thompson and partners own it, or whether the mortgage company owns
it. There were many parties involved in this issue. This parcel
has had a history of many code enforcement problems. The Planning
Commission approved to have certain improvements stretched out over
two years. There was reluctance by current owners to put more
money into the site if they did not get title.
Mr. Barna stated the position of Planning Commission was to allow
time to clear the title.
Mr. Sherek asked if someone other than Mr. Poppenhagen would be
doing the improvements.
Ms. McPherson stated this was correct.
Ms. Sherek stated that, if no one did improvements, the City would
then have a sign.
Ms. McPherson stated this was an issue and that this issue had been
discussed by the Planning Commission and included in the
stipulations for the special use permit.
Mr. Sherek asked if Ms. McPherson had been by the property in the
last few days.
Ms. McPherson stated that she had been by the property about 2
weeks ago. The property was looked at when the special use permit
came up and then again about two weeks ago.
Mr. Sherek asked if the property had been cleaned up.
Ms. McPherson stated there has not been much activity as far as
clean up of the site. The trailers have not been removed.
14T
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 7
OM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:10 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated that Mr. Poppenhagen had just received
Planning Commission approval for a special use permit for an auto
body shop at 7570 Hiqhway 65. This will go before the City Council
on August 28. It was an M-1, Light Industrial, district. Keith
would like to advertise his business with a sign and was proposing
to place the sign on the north side. The site plan presented was
proposed and not current. The Planninq Commission required new
pavement and curb and planting areas. Keith would like to place
the sign on the north side within 10 feet of the side property
line. There was currently a grassy area there, but no pavement.
This would be on the side of driveway. Staff has recommended that,
even though there was no landscaping there, there was still an
opportunity to place the sign 10 feet from the line. Bollards
could be placed around the sign to protect it. The sign as
proposed was within the square footage allowed in the sign
ordinance.
Mr. Barna asked how far to the north was Lampert's Lumber sign.
Ms. McPherson stated she did not measure. She thought the sign was
in the lower south half of the parcel near the boulevard.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated this sign was straight out the front
entrance of Lampert's.
Ms. McPherson stated there was currently a service road to the east
that ends approximately in the center of the parcel. Mr.
Poppenhagen's business was located in the second building toward
the rear of the property. The sign did not come up as an issue
during the special use permit process. Potentially the owners
should be required to have a comprehensive sign plan because they
potentially could have more than three tenants.
Dr. Vos asked if the owners would have more signs in addition to
this sign.
Ms. McPherson stated that a development was allowed only one free
standing sign.
Mr. Poppenhagen stated that the tenants in the front building
advertise in the window in front of that building.
Ms. McPherson stated siqns are allowed on the structure.
Dr. Vos felt the proposed sign was a small sign.
Staff Report
VAR #89-16, 7110 Riverwood Drive N.E.
Page 2
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
�
C.
Section 205.07.03.D.(1) requires a front yard setback of not
less than 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-
street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way
and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building
"line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
STATED HARDSHIP:
See attached letters.
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
Request
The petitioner, Kenneth Tigue, is proposing to construct a
1,220 sq. ft. single family residential home on Lot 10, Block
2, of Riverview Park, the same being 7110 Riverwood Drive.
In order to construct this single family home, the petitioner
is requesting a reduction in the required front yard setback
from 35 feet to 30 feet.
Site
The lot is located
R-1, Single Family
Family Dwelling, o
Anal�sis
in the Riverwood Park plat. It is zoned
Dwelling, and is surrounded by R-1, Single
n all sides.
The proposed single family home is being constructed on Lot
10, Block 2, of Riverwood Park Plat. It is located on the
right turn corner of Riverwood Drive; however, when the street
was platted, the right-of-way for the corner has a"bubble"
in it (see plat map). Also on this lot is a 35 ft. drainage
and utility easement across the rear portion of the lot. This
drainage and utility easement is more restrictive than the
29.7 ft. required rear yard setback, which is 25$ of 118 feet
which is the lot depth. The proposed house is 48 ft. in
depth, and the petitioner is proposing a reduction in the
front yard setback of 5 feet from 35 feet to 30 feet. If the
35 ft. setback is maintained on one corner of the qarage, the
garage would be encroaching by approximately 5 feet (see site
plan). Looking at the plat map, the 30 ft. setback is equal
to the 35 ft. setback (see plat map) on adjacent lots. This
is caused by the "bubble" in the corner of the street.
14U
Staff Report
VAR #89-16, 7110 Riverwood Drive N.E.
Page 3
The petitioner has several alternatives which would allow him
to construct his house on Lot 10, Block 2, Riverwood Park,
without encroaching into the front yard setback. His first
alternative would be to vacate 5 feet of the drainage and
utility easement across the rear of the yard. This would give
the petitioner the needed 5 ft. instead of reducing the front
yard setback. The petitioner also has an option of vacating
the easement only where the house would encroach into the
easement. Again, this would give him the needed room without
encroaching into the front yard. The petitioner also has the
option of building over the easement with a letter of
indemnification to the City which would be recorded against
the property.
The petitioner is not agreeable to the above three
alternatives due to the lengthy process of vacating the
easement and also with the letter of indemnification "hanging
over his head" or any other potential buyer of the house. The
petitioner, of course, also has the option of building a
smaller house or a house that is two stories. The petitioner
has chosen to build this particular style of house.
Recommendation
Staff is recommending that the Appeals Commission deny the
request, VAR #89-16, to reduce the required front yard setback
from 35 feet to 30 feet on the basis that the petitioner has
four other options he can pursue which would allow him to
build within the Code.
APPEAIS COMMISSION ACTION
The Appeals Commission voted 3-1 in favor of recommending approval
to the City Council of the variance request, VAR #89-16, to reduce
the front yard setback from 35 feet to 30 feet, to allow the
construction of a new home on Lot 10, Block 2, Riverwood Park, the
same being 7110 Riverwood Drive N.E.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance, VAR #$9-
16, on the basis that the petitioner has four other options he can
pursue which would allow him to build within the Code.
14V
14W
August 1, 1989
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
TO iiHOM IT MAY CONCSBN:
We are requesting a setback variance for the property at 71XX Riverwood
Drive, Fridley. We have put money down on this lot, applied for a loan
and sold our home in the meantime. When we found this lot we were willing
to pay a premium price for it because of the Iocation, as we have been home
owners in Fridley since 1958 and we would like to stay in Fridley.
When we received the official survey it revealed a very large drainage
easement. This easement, plus all of the other setback requirements will
prevent us from building a very modest 1220 square foot home. If this
easement isn't granted we probably will not build anything on this lot
and it will go back to the previous owner and it will become his problem.
Thank you,
fj�. ��.! " -t�C.
Mr. & Mrs. Kenn�th A. Tigue
1141 Lynde Dr. N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
571-6102
14X
To Whom it may concern;
Lot 10, Block 2, Riverwood Park located on Riverwood Drive,
at a point where it curves and runs east before again running
north,
At the point where Riverwood Drive curves, a portion of the
Drive has been widened, cutting into lots 10, 11, and 12,
forming an almost cul de sac style circle.
Because a thirty-five foot setback is measured from this
extended curve, the area on the lot available to build a
house has been reduced. This would not normally have been
a problem, except �hat there is also a large drainage easement
on the back (north side) of the lot. (See survey).
Between this easement and the setback from the curved street,
there is very little room left to build a decent sized home.
We are asking that you grant a variance of the thirty-five foot
setback to thirty feet, because the setback is measured from
the curved part of Riverwood Drive. This would not interrupt
the site lines of the other homes on the street since their
setback was measured from the straight part of Riverwood Drive.
I, the realtor and builder have discussed the problem with the
Fridley City Planners and Engineers. The best solution we
could come up with was to request this variance. The survey
included shows the house as it would be positioned on the lot
if you grant this variance. As you can see it will meet all
other restrictions and be a fine addition to the neighborhood.
14Y
To Whom it may concern;
� My name is Peter Ludwig. I own Lot 10, Block 12,
Riverwood Park. I am selling the lot to Ken Tigue subject
to his being able to build a home on the site. I bought the
lot from Jerry Tollefson in November, 1988, and had intended to
build a home there for myself. I am a volunteer Fridley Fire-
, man and must remain within a set distance from the firehouse.
When Fridley decided to build a new firehouse on 77th, I was
able to live farther out on a bigger lot, so I put this lot up
for sale in February, 1989. When Mr. Tigue signed a purchase
agreement with me, I purchased another lot.
I was not aware of a large drainage easement to the back
of Lot 10, Block 2, until I received a copy of a survey Mr.
Tigue had done. That easement and the setback requirements
from the curved portion of Riverwood Drive make it almost
impossible to build a normal sized home on this lot. I realize
that the setback is thirty-five feet and that Mr. Tigue is
asking for a thirty foot setback. I believe that this will not
interfere with any site lines of the other homes in the area
because the setback is measured from the curved portion of
Riverwood Drive while the other ho;�es' setbacks have been mea-
sured from the straight portion of Riverwood Drive.
I have watched closely as Mr. Tigue, his realtor, and his
builder have struggled with this problem and I see no other
alternative if you do not grant the setback variance requested
I may be unable to sell my lot and will be unable to build on
the other lot I also own. I am asking that you grant Mr. Tigue's
request.
Sincerely,
� " � '
1�
Peter J. Ludwig
�
,
e
�••_•
C. �O, T 30, R. 2 4 _
OF FR/OLEY
� 0
� 8 � ai
�
,o
���" , , ,
,: � „ —
t . � �� e
2,� N / .
(� M� h>>
h : .
,v �,o .;_ y�,,_ �
_' , /J.� i — • .,. -� � t_-•
� �r �� . •ti� i - p� �/) : ({�� M;. � f9, A�1 W . J r -
� rh�s ,s� • co..v��. �,
�iM(r �rr�a��N inc
� O�iK f 5�flEC 1 nv:. ••
� IMIS a�M�N(� /S �C. !:
� RfFEfir+C( W�piE.
Ir �S r+0� RfS►Or+S��
♦CCWAC�fS MCefi�
535
f W COANEN
f��' ' 8 � � z , �• = � � I
-`%' �,� � y,, G , tt+' O "• � 3 . ; I , ,5,, , ,.,
. �, I `LOGAN.� :r• • � „ ' F `jl�; u ,�(� �
fti,� :r++ • � y � y . PKWY. F � n�� t i'� i �►" '
r;t � ,� w
� ;�� Ze �. � �F Ca W:• fJ � � � 2 � �I_�Q� �
� _._ L I� tJ 1� t7 , W '.. ;. J
. `~ 2! j' ' • •;I I
` 'p �+ - p ~ Q � t . .i , � ;��
� �t!'i S s is �' :P i�� � ' �_ �� :; � t c� I 1p1.
.', �� � ,, � ---- - ` ,.; .- �AiK ,�:' • , " ;� ' ;y, l� ; '_ ��(R
k , : r '�., . , . ' ; ..i . _ q I t �� f
- ;�' ;� :'� � '"'° ,�, ` '. 35_. : ., � ; ; ;i `
p ( .. � �r. � 1� •�• �. � � il ti � .�� ��� __���
;/ � , ,K` • . a �� �.y• G}i!�t � .`.r'^ � � :�✓: u� i •'���1 �
' � : I . . ; /..n ! . ,� 1 / • ;P � �` I S 1 � L t I
.I Q Y W " _ ' ;1�� .� � � w , . 44. e . � � �.� „
-- Q. �-- ,RlVEA �- �. , j � t, I
-f� � K � ' T�����,6� ' � �wri.r� - y ' . � I �i
• . - W ' 3 ~ `'' - � k ~ t > ! ,� � _.� � :� ` � •,;,ia � � '� � �
r, R/V'£R-� ~ r• �-? ' .:g s � } ";. p °•,. -.'e''� ', r I`��. � �� �, y .
''i -":.`-••°- �+�i. ��. " ��� ' 4: r` /� a=r� e i.a:.'+ �3 j•� � ' �I � ` I�
WO Of' � �p. � RIVERW :. t 1: �,••� , I . I� i P
_..., r, W , �r�, .J'� a' �:r• .j . � Q' ry �r ��n;'✓i;i�i Y' �'��;.P-� I
��MANO � � • ; s 2'' A f(. -. ' + � �,� s ; .' ' �i � � In� I .: -
� 'r � 1� .3 , x s' ��� � �� 'ii � iit�. � y . • � � -.�� �' �� � I "�� � 'i ' t �
i .. ¢,r• w s�4��Se� �7ri'� �� r 1 /� M ��
' "'� , ° , , y f . .; � . �,� _ w J ,
- .f:� ' �: ' � � .. -�— -�-- �-
� , , RIDN'S RfVEAW000 .. ' MANDI�+ ",_;� .,� -- ; : •�`� . � ._ �., * � .
, � - - ,tt � �':
3 1�2 I 9 ro� ii �,1 r, ,� r. �� i� ep i� ..�--w�ni �/+�R 4 "� 1 •/ .'K '� ���� i
L; TERi�ACE� . - I `� � °� � � � i't�� � n_...r'� �ti .:,,�1 •��.. ' -
�! T '� d �'' � • I~ .. . '.
--+ R€VtSED _ � __ ---_ ' h, �.>y � � •; � ', %, •....
_�. A.1/D1�'�QRS, � =��- � y..�,�'•J-- �` _ .t r . . ! ' � � �j � p ai i�;
--� ^ -�r---- - -+ -- - -7---� . :n^ � , � r Z
---I ------!r--- -'�r;' —�---- - -- A • � i � � �
: . W , '" � �. ST'�M<l-N" ' ��' .L c'—i
� - �; : _===t�Qk�� e�QZ�_- � , , . �.. — - - /� . � - i :� � 4
t __ _' ___ _--J� _ _ _�i� , � �{o V� � F w r��� � I�. (i }
; -- . ' �.w _' a. .: ' il �
-- -- �=--- --=a�-i� -_-, -; _ • =" � i,, � ;,,.--�--1 �, � II ;i � ; �
f_- __� ir-___' �-__ _ _. �i'�� .+ ...... .�....9?. .`�M r� ,. i � , i � �
-- -- --- _-_-'--' � . � rn •I w�r�~ N E • � t 1 1 �I (/i �
a�-� I
_J �-_— _- -__T 7 _-� -_ P• '. � . � r r w. I I __.�.
- , . ,. 1 � .i' a . . .�o-s v��
�_'^j L� -�r __ _ V `�` � r� '0-.�, • � . �: • -• •• I� •I• I I'�� � :�li V N0�►�RD
"_� r _ _-_ 1� �\. i ,� � � ' ��1 , � � �y j I O
__�� � —y __-_ • \� • I � ,^.a � . � ,�y ;.�� z. ' � ., . � = `l ` o�' 0 ' ..r�� �� Z I
�Y� �_ � �R� �_�_� \�� �\ \ �' ��� . �'`..D' v.. �•N f I��' � � �I J I
�-, � � ' �,/ `j�/ ` .: _ :.
r. - ._s�.4.1,i----- � 5+'; - i •�• '� . . _ I.i.�. I p
9 � y, � \ •�� 'i • �• •,. ' , ••' �,: " � �
_-_a..� -_�i .' ____.1 I I :� : i� � �� ���� i , _�� /O � ��•. 1 � /i�� � ,
___ I L-_"!t'r-�__�___�. i/i ,� • /i�'F"'r. t` , � ,�r i� . � I Q I
�i__y �_ _, r - ' _T'� . , t . ° _ : ' .0 � ' .�, •' _� (� �
�:----i � --'�' -r�r-+ � �, 1�° .n. � . . . '� .. �.�:` :� .� ;�:� c;��y. �� W I
w-._�-�/� `__„ . ' I ` I N�,d.' ' / .(20�� ' \4 f • M �. �d ' •' •I ��
�--t� -- �L-� 1-�-� •-i� .. -- �. � .. ';`1" • ,�L:'�.;
s ���rrr--- --r-�`s� '�r'-' ' ' � �_ r"i ..�..
�6911N, w�r N E' ' . ��: - -
,y S£ CD�IYCN
� � � ' r.' • �...n. �. SEC. �D
� � ��<��
i ' r� ♦;�;
�8\ 43 44 . "a��'
. , ._ , . .
� t�
LOCATION MAP
�
� v�
�Ai�
; f�
� w
i. � �
� ��
I � I
� ��
� �,
..•�
ZONING MAP
�L
i
` 5/�\
�
�I'133_
�iv�2u/oop
Lot 10, Block 2, RIVF�AOD PARK
��
I
/
-_
SITE PLAN
�
[r��� �
I
�
I
J
-_ �.
, °� �� �� � f I � .•• �
o �� `� I CJ a3 � J
� -� � .� Y �
�; �' �
___ ('•. � � C�
_, � �
79. !p � � � S,U2 �) : .
�- �
7,Sp ��� __ -
,W ��
7,5. � � �
0 0 ► �, �, �--_ 1 2
� `�� \J � .O ��s zfl�j 766� �
` � �
��� N O gl Ip� �1 8���
:-SJ�y• ✓ 2 1 0 � � .
� '
� , �� � � � � �j � O � � 0
i
� 93 ��': � ivu•so 01 E E 1 �. � h p �.
— r -- ��,? ... ��:.: � ��. 4 .; � T N
--_ ��=� — «—=�� -:`e,•»Z� � ,�� s�. � - o
111. 3 1'� .� 7'�`-OiD : -�t o� F J = ��—°'�� E ti
"'� ��� v � iO/?� � k �� Co _— � S
��� �� z j ���� 7soo A� �S g2� ._ �'� s''�,� \ 1
�� ,., � � 8 �.��t�'r1 � 9(jtQ � 76 7S �' � 3.3 '% � �'?? E `�
S -�- ��� ' ��
.yQ.+�fs.���, r yr�l�-� `'�'�✓•,v� g 68, 8y . BO.1 �`, s
�f,,�;. ,� �,�.� ?v , E4seme� f..��..a .... . 80. 48 �
i! � � ,�,������: -. ^�; zo�~wj � . ��==-- --
v,, g� 10 �o � � 'r----==-�-� �=— s u s'��
�. oo s,� _ � �o v p '�J ��
�s � d .c4� � ,; 9 � � 8 � �
�,: �� �� ���' T o�
'js- , s•� s!. ak' ��' �� v �' G' ~ a
9 ` � � �` .,i
� .� �L ��L// � � � / / ' J
/ i5�' � 9 � `:/ L '�5'B� pq
,
► � `�' a�� A0 • ��` � � — 80 °O—_ r /.
'=J2's7- � � �'�� .' � —
h . 0
1 ° arv
' � i � �i�"�SO.00 -- �
� a ; � ,- � � EQ WppQ
�� � , r�p��0� 1�'� ' 44' �.� S8S•03 sp ~� Z2C.
Cb - � ,�.5> > �g1� , 7.s
�='iV 5 0 ' � - �
. 1 _ �T y--_ ..._ _ _
:t-• �� p _ _ ,,,_
1 �. � I � 6 � e �--- •
PLAT MAP
;
:�
;►.
��.
�;
il
i�
. 'i
�
�
•.
�
��
�►..� ii.i
� Ililllilll�l'
!� � 1���
� � I' �
( ( ,
i I
I i �
�� ! '
'� �
: (
1
��
1' I�i, �,,
;
. -;
I I
� i�
� ,
. EL�VATION
�
Z�
�
.,.'
�
v
�
�
,:
;;
;�
,,
��
E„����•���.�,,,
s„w��.
w.�<<��
P,rw,
ISlrec(ti
M.����ie��,r�cc
MEMORANDUM
DATE: Auqust 16, 1989 PW89-317
TO: Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planninq Assistant
14FF
FROM: Mark Winson, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Drainaqe Easement at the Rear of Lot 10, Block
2, Riverwood Park for Variance Request, VAR
�89-16, by Kenneth Tique
The easement at the rear of Lot 10 is provided for a detention pond
that serves a storm drainaqe from Lots 1 throuqh 10, Block 2,
Riverwood Park. The easement is sized to provide a minimum of one
foot of freeboard above the 100 year pond level.
Any encroachment into the easement would require the homeowner to
indemnify the City against damages from stormwater and/or any
S damages from equipment that needs to get in to repair the pond area
�� in the future.
MW/dn
M-89-487
�
•
TO:
FROM:
DATEt
Engince� �
Stwer
W:iter
Parks
Strceis
�LMa�nten.fr�.���
MEMORANDUM
William W. Burns, City Manager
John G. Flora,�Public Works Director
September 5, 1989
SUBJECT: Water Study Agreement
PW89-339
Within the Water Systems Study completed by HNTB, it was
recommended that a water source study be conducted for our shallow
well system.
Bruce A. Leisch & Associates, who did the preliminary work in a
joint agreement with HNTB, has submitted a proposal to complete a
water quality study for the shallow wells. The agreement calls
for completing the study in three (3) months at a cost not to
exceed $15,991.00. The study will consist of assembling ground
water information associated with the Fridley area and attempt to
determine the source, quantities and impact of trichlorethylene
(TCE) found in the Mount Simon aquifer within the Commons Park
area. Any additional study regarding the possible treatment of
contaminates can be addressed separately once the data is obtained.
Recommend the City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into an
agreement with Bruce A. Leisch & Associates to conduct a water
quality study.
Funds for this can be appropriated from Water Utility Fund.
JGF/ts
15
�
�• �
E„g��,e<<���
s�;W��
w:����
Parks
S�ree(s
Mai!itendn;.�.
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager
FROM: John G. Flora � Public Works Director
DATE: September 7, 1989
SIIBJECT: Elevated Water Reservoir Design
PW89-340
Within the Water Distribution Study completed by HNTB, it was
recommended that a 1 MG elevated water reservoir be located in the
low level section of the distribution system to provide adequate
water pressure and fire protection.
The study also recommended that a preferred site for the 1 MG
reservoir would be within the Locke Park area.
We have received an agreement from HNTB to investigate and design
a 1 MG elevated water reservoir for $39,000 plus any soil
investigation costs not to exceed $5,000.00.
In order to insure adequate water capacity and pressure to the low
level system of the City, recommend the City Council authorize the
Mayor to enter into the agreement with HNTB to design a 1 MG
elevated water reservoir at Locke Park.
Funds for this study were identified in our 1991 Capital
Improvement Program within the Water Utility Fund of $50,000.00.
JGF/ts
16
�
�• �
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SIIBJECT:
E„��„��.�
stWe�
w:icer
P,�rkS
Streels
Ma�nten.�nc•,
MEMORANDUM
William W. Burns, City Manager
John G. F1ora,lPublic Works Director
September 7, 1989
Fridley Municipal Center Improvement
Project No. 189 - Change Order No. 12
PW89-342
Change Order No. 12 consists of Proposal Request Nos. 79, 93 and
95; Work Order Nos. 1935, 1947, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1954, 1957,
and 1958 for the Municipal Center totaling $10,068.00.
Change Order No. 12 consists of Work Order Nos. 1953 and 1956 for
the Ramp totaling $1,870.00.
Change Order No. 12 consists of Proposal Request Nos. 66A for the
Fire Department for a cost of $1,195.00.
Proposal Request No. 53 for the Compressor Room was originally
estimated on Change Order No. 5 for $6,000.00. The actual cost to
complete the room was $1,833.00, a deduct of ($4,167.00). Change
Order No. 12 amends Proposal Request No. 53 to reflect this new
total.
Proposal Request No. 19 for the east stairwell of the Municipal
Center was amended to add Park Construct cost�of $2,242.00. Change
Order No. 12 amends Proposal Request No. 19 to reflect the new
total.
Also, Change Order No. 12 includes a Contract Amendment for Glewwe
Doors, Inc. for additional hardware ($1,666.00) and Guillaume and
Associates for additional finishing work ($4,740.00) deducted in
Change Order No. 10 from Country Cabinets, Inc.
The attached Change Order identifies the Proposal Requests and Work
Order costs for the entire renovation project.
Recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 12 to the
Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189.
JGF/BN/ts
Attachments
17
�
�: �
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVE., N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
September 11, 1989
Kraus-Anderson Const. Co.
525 So. Eighth St.
Minneapolis, MN 55404
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 12 - Proposal Request Nos. 66A, 79, 93,
and 95; and Field Work Order Nos. 1935, 1947, 1949, 1950, 1951,
1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, and 1958 for the Fridley
Municipal Cente� Improvement Project No. 189
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the
Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189 by adding the following wo�k:
66A Fire emergency power
79 Additional electrical
smoke detector, floor
lights
93 Light fixture changes
95 Airlock vestibule changes
1935 Add diffusers in lobby
1947 Add fire dampers
1949 Coa�cial cable - Police
1954 lnstall base cone in
bathroom
1951 Replace and reroute
sprinkler pipe
1952 Sp�ay paint open
ceiling - Police
Gephart Electric
Gephart Electric
Gephart Eleciric
Environ-Con, Inc.
Environ-Con, Inc.
Environ-Con, Inc.
Gephart Electric
Grauini Bros., Inc.
Nationai Auto.
Sprinkler
Guillaume
1,195.00
3,430.00
1,750.00
95.00
P. R. Subtotal
264.00
270.00
1,084.00
570.00
400.00
265.00
17A
6,470.00
i
,
Mr. Tom Sackett
Kraus-Anderson Const. Co.
Change Order No. 12
September 11, 1989
Page Two
iIVORK ..... . ... � .:,:
�RDEFi ; ,
' NO. ir�M
1953 Reroute sprinkler
heads and hose cabinets
1954 Building inspection
File c8binet 8
drawer file
1955 Relocate electric to
move screen
1956 Add eiectric for ramp
intercom and remote
station
1957 Canopy column caps and
lower curbs
1958 Change wall to ceiling
National Auto.
Sprinkler
Country Cabinets, Inc.
Gephart Electric
Gephart Electric
Sealtreat, Inc.
. , . �-�
, � ��
1,030.00
�Y��:�]
589.00
1 %B
mount � Environ-Con � 75.00 �
Worlc Order Subtotal 6,767.00
PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 19 AMENDMENT: Chan Order No. 3
AMEND P.R. NO. 19:
East stairwell Paric Construction 2 2. 42.00
BALANCE OF P.R. NO. 19
PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. 53 AMENDMENT: C Order No. 5
53 Relocate Sir compressor
piping in Fire �ept.
AMEND P.R. NO. 53:
Air compressor room Guillaume d� Assoc.
Mulcahy, Inc.
Gephart Electric
Klamm Mechanical
Subtotal
BALANCE OF P.R. NO. 53
. ��� ��
260.00
840.00
205.00
528.00
1,833.00
2,242.00
(4,167.00)
Mr. Tom Sackett
Kraus-Anderson Const. Co.
Change Order No. 12
September 1 t , 1989
Page Th�ee
CONTRACT EXTRA:
CONTRACT DEDUCT:
CONTRACT EXTRA:
Curren Y. Nielson Co.
Environ-Con, Inc.
Glewwe Doors, Inc.
1,200.00
(1.200.001
SubtOtal
1 •666•00
Subtotal
17C
� ��
t ,666.00
CONTRACT EXTRA: Guiilaume 8 Assoc. 4 740.0
Subtotal 4,740.00
TOTAL ADDlTlONS FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 12. ......... 517.718•00
70TA1 CHANGE ORDERS:
Origina! Contract Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contract Additions: Change Order No. 1......
Change Order No. 2 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 3 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 4 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 5 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 6 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 7 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 8 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 9 . . . . . .
Change Order No. 10 . . . . .
Change Order No. 11 . . . . .
Change Order No. 12 . . . . .
3,419,170.00
16,570.00
8,975.00
21,157.00
30,700.00
31,000.00
51,486.43
35,457.16
16,676.00
6,733.00
32,380.00
(670.00)
17,718.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT. . . . . . . . . . . . 3,687,352.59
Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on the 14th day of August, 1989.
Prepared by
Checked by �C�
o G. Flora, P.E.
irecto� of PubliC Works
Mr. Tom Sackett
Kraus-Anderson Const. Co.
Change Order No. 12
September 11, 1989
Page Four
17D
Recommend this day of , 1989, by
KRAUS-ANDERSON CONST. CO.
Tom Sackett, Project Manager
Approved and accepted this 11 th day of September, 1989.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
William J. Nee, Mayor
William W. Burns, Ciry Manager
�.�..
5�.. � .
M.� .,�.,,.r�- �•
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manaqer �,��`� PW89-341
FROK: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: September 7, 1989
BIIBJECT: Storm Sewer Pipe Repair Project No. 194
18
We propose to repair the Bennett Drive storm system through the
insertion of an inverted epoxy liner to the existing stona pipe.
Advertisement for the project was made and bids were received from
the sole producer of the Insituform system Insituform Central, Inc.
Their bid for this work amounts to $24,799.72.
Currently the Tnsituform company is working in the City of
Minneapolis installing Insituform on a number of their sanitary
sewer lines. Accordingly, by grouping our project while they are
in the area should result in considerable savinqs in mobilization
and installation costs.
In order to eliminate the open joint system that exists in Bennett
Drive, recommend the City Council receive the bids and award the
contract to Insituform for an amount of $24,799.72.
Funds in the amount of S26, 000. 00 are allocated in the 1989 Capital
Improvement Proqram for this project.
JGF/ts
Attachment
0
•
18A
BID PROPOS]!LS FOR
6TORI�I 881BR PIP$ REPl1IR �ROJBCT �TO. 194
TIIB8D71Y� SEPTEMBER 6� 1989 11:00 ]1.1[.
�
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL --
SEPTEMBER 11, 1989 '
BLECTRICAL
Fraenkel Electric Inc.
3612 Fillmore Street N.E.
Minneapolis, I�J 55418
BBCAVATING
The Krumholz Company
3107 Lyndale Avenue North
Minneapolis, I�T 55411
Waalen & Sabby Inc.
8825 Baltimore Street N.E.
Blaine, NII3 55434
By: Morris Fraenkel
By: Harley Oelschager
By: Ronald Sabby
GAS SERVICES
Cronstrom's Heating & Air Cond. Inc.
4410 Excelsior Blvd
Minneapolis, Mn 55416 By: James Rice
Dale Sorensen Company
150 West 88th Street, #6
Bloomington, MN 55420 By: Dale Sorensen
C3ENERAL CONTRACTOR
Anderson-Mann Construction Co.
2929 - 4th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55408 By: David Walock
C J's Building & Remodeling
Route #1, Box 177
Princeton, MN 55371
Thyen Construction Inc.
1872 -29th Avenue N.W.
New Brighton, NIIJ 55112
By: Clarence Foyen
By: James Thyen
u
LICENSES
STATE OF MINN
DARREL CLARK
Chief ffidq Ofcl
Same
CLYDE WILEY
Med�,/Bldq InsP •
Same
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldq Ofcl
Same
Same
HEATINt3
C.o. Carlson Air Conditioninq Co.
1203 Bryant Avenue North CLYDE WILEY
Minneapolis, l�i 55411 By: Thomas J. Lindskog Mech/Bldg Insp
Cronstrom's Heating & Air Cond. Inc.
4410 Excelsior Blvd.
Minneapolis, 1�1 55416 By: James Rice
Dale Sorensen Company
150 West 88th Street, #6
Bloominqton, I�1 55420 By: Dale Sorensen
�
Same
Same
PLUMBIN(3
Leon Duda Plumbing Services
208 - 17th Avenue North
Hopkins, MN 55343 By: Leon Duda
Ebert Plumbing & Heating
1800 - 49th Avenue N.E.
Columbia Heights, MN 55421
The Krumholz Company
3107 Lyndale Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55411
By: Doug Ebert
By: Harley Oelschager
21B
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
OWNER
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENSES
September 11, 1989 P•1
LOCATION dF BUILDING UNITS FEE
Rc�nald Burg
71�2 Central Ave. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Hong & Piau
c/o Dai-Shen & Graoe Horq
2298 17th St. NW
New Bric�t:an, NIId 55112
Five Sar�ds Dev. Co.
c/o Midwest I�tt.
7100 Wayzata Blvd.
Mpls, I�IId 55426
(same as abave)
(same as �bove)
(same as above)
(s��une as above)
Richa�i Den�seY
10415 28th Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Laurerx7e & Karen Russell
6011 Main St.
�idley, NIId 55432
Chris Jelevarov
6477 Riverview Terr. NE
FYidley, I�IId 55432
Lirr.�berg Inve.stments
c/o Bennett Lin�erg
20531 R�m► River Blvd. NW
Anoka, MN 55303
c�ris Jelevarw
6477 Rivexview Z�err. NE
F�idley, NIl�I 55432
David Baune, Partner
Midw�est Irlv�trnent. C'o.
3111 Dar�lth Dt.
�toelsior, I�1 55331
7170-6 Central Ave.
7190 Central Ave.
7805 E. River Rd.
7825 E. River �d.
7845 E. River Rd.
7875 E. River i�d.
7895 E. River Rd.
6341 Hwy. #65
6011 Main St.
160 Mississippi Place
1601 N. InnsbrucJc Dr.
#308,353,363
6471-77 Riverview 'I�rr.
5851 2ni St.
4 36.00
4 36.00
59 143.00
59 143.00
59 143.00
59 143.00
59 143.00
10 49.00
4 36.00
J
4 36.00
3 36.00
3 36.00
11 49.00
APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSZNG INSPECTOR
�
OWNER
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LZCENSEB
September 11, 1989 p,2
LOCATIQN OF BUILDING UNI7S FEE
Willard C�imo�t 5980 3rd St.
5980 3rd St. NE #1
Fridley, I�T 55432
Margaret Hendley 5800 4th St.
118 Craig Way NE
F�idley, NIIV 55432
Anthoriy & EVangeline Nicklow 5400-2 7th St.
1150 Heritage Ia.
Orono, MN 55391
Dennis iCmit & Johanna I�ucic�w 5460 7th St.
3158 Arthur St. Ne
Mpls, NIId 55418
Dravid Baune, Partner 191 59 1/2 Way
Midwest Utvestment Co.
3111 Dax-tinaith Ave.
bcceisior, IrIId 55331
Stellar Inc. 1250 72nd Ave.
5236 L�ochluy Dt.
Fdina, MN 55436
Rudy Bayer 371 74th Ave.
2921 Br�oo]cshire In.
N�w Bric�ton, NIl�i 55112
Mark Akbari 476-#5,#6,#7�#10,#11 75th
8809 Tyler St. Ave.
Blaine, NIl�1 55434
[�Z•�Z�7
4 36.00
3 36.00
34 93.00
12 49.00
29 83.00
4 36.00
5 36.00
APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
1D
OWNER
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENSES
September 11, 1989 - P.3
LOCATION OF BUILDING UNITS FEE
Zioc�d Ftlerht�mar�n
3985 99th I�ne NE
Circle Pines, NIld 55014
Marvey Mayer
7431 Able 5t. NE
FYidley, NIl�i 55432
Ta1[uny & Z'erzy Marquardt
6588-92 Central Ave.
Fridley, NAi 55432
Steven Mindlin
4526 Pleasant Dr.
St. Paul, MN 55112
John Harmnar�g
805 Wirydemere Dr.
Plymouth, MN 55441
William Ouellette
7848 Miss. Iane
Brooklyn Park, MN 55444
Allan & Pamela Fehn
1251 Hillwir�d Rd. NE
FYidley, NAi 55432
Lyle christie
5627 W. Bavarian Pass
FYidley, NIId 55432
Corrine Jespe.rson
5482 E. Brerulex Pass
F7idley, NAi 55432
Lawrence & Wer�dy Etv�ert
P.O. Box 225
Urlalakleet, AK 99684
Michael & Debra S�niej a
742 W. C7�ty. Rd. B
Roseville, NIl�1 55113
7417-19 Able St.
7431-33 Able St.
6588-92 Ceritral Ave.
7335-7 Central Ave.
140-42 C2�arles St. NE
7432 Corx�erto Ctirve
1251-53 Hillwuxi Rd.
1601 N. Innsbruc3c Dr.
#208
1601 N. Irut�bzucJc Dr.
#221
1601 N. Innsbnick Dr.
#224
1601 N. InnsbY't�k Dr.
#234
2 24.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
2 24.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
�PPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
OWNER
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENSES
September 11, 1989 P.4
LOCATION OF BUILDING UNITS FEE
Ronald Eric3�son &
Plyll is ReY�a
1247 Lor�g I�lt�e Rd.
New ffiic�ton, NIld 55112
Luis & Joyoe Rubio
1562 N. Oberlin Circle
Fridley, NIN 55432
Donovan or Sharry Elias
7390 Conoerto C�ve NE
�idley, NIl�I 55432
(same as above)
Mark Clasen
6345 Pierce St.
FYidley, NIIJ 55432
Andrew Kociscak
585 E. Co. Rd. B
Little Canada, NIld 55117
Denise smith
6492 RiveYView Terr. NE
FYidley, NA1 55432
Mark Akbari
8809 2j�ler St. NE
Blaine, NII�T 55434
Bruae Zwirtz
7313, University Ave. NE
Fridley, NIld 55432
Steven Chies
8624 Miss. Blvd.
Coon Rapids, IrIN 55433
Robert Dove �
7505 Jackso�► St. NE
FYidley, I�T 55432
Maureen Stiillivan �
617 E. Ridgeview Dr.
Wayzata, I�1 55391
1601 N. IruLSbnlck Dr.
#254
1601 N. Inrl�sblvGk Dr.
#357
1240-42 Norton Ave.
1250-52 Norton Ave.
6345 Pie,roe St.
1631 Rice Cree�c Rd. NE
6496-98 Riverview Terr.
396-98 Syt�ahoriy St. NE
7313-15 University Ave.
7349-51 University Ave.
7385-87 University Ave.
5409 West Brexu�er Pass
1 12.00
1 12.00
2 24.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
2 24.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
2 24.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
�PPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
I■_� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENB$8
L�
C11YOF September 11, 1989 � P•5
FRIDLEY
OWNER LOCATION OF BUILDING UNITS FEE
Andrew KoCisc,ra]C 5131-35 3rd St.
8741 Central Ave.
Blaine, NIl�I 55434
Josegh Sinigaglio 5191-93 3rd St.
4715 3L�i St. NE
FYidley, rM1 55432
NHC Pro�er'ties 5141-43 3n3 St.
7635 Alden Way
FYidley, NIId 55432
Stepheri & Doree.ri T.i cr-hal k 5357 4th St.
13225 James Ave. S.
Burn��ville, NIIJ 55337
RichaxYi Kappes 5370 4th St.
3129 Webster Ave.
Mpls, rM1 55416
Douglas Fiege 5461 4th St.
9220 Bataan St. �
Blaine, NIld 55434
Steve Heine�}ce 5365-67 5th St.
5365 5th St.
FYidley, NIld 55421
Timothy Wheeler 5600 6th St.
3160 E. 78th
Ir�ver Grove Hts. , NIN 55078
James P�earson 5606-08 6th St.
2101 Burns Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55119
2 24.00
2 24.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
1 12.00
2 24.00
1 12.00
Rohullah Vedadhaghi 450-#7, 450--#10 75th Ave. 2 24.00
8527 Hiawatha Ave. S.
Fden Prairie, NIld 55344
APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
�:�PROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
,*,:..n :..; T. .,. .�.. .... . . .
� � . . . . � . ' . . .
. � . " �' . -. .
�, -. ,_ � � , :' . � . . .
-• -
, , , �
`2
� .. •
� {�. y�ya3f f : yt}p ``�� - �+ zr.h`'�.+ ',
. _ ' � . �i i�y A , � Z,ti.. ���? +'���i
- i '
, `1 � <R? .� i �
k �:� c
� j ���:�y - . . . . . . ';p x �t �� � �,
.5 { ' '5 �+' -�< l.`
,�b � T . .. . � R 3 f`.-aci
k S`
; ��
R
�� � .. � . 3- � �gN7 x �e
_ . . . . . . G`: ��` ..
� �j� �:
� _ � . . , y w � F.
� §` ; : �
�
#� .
. V : �+r� '+� .�
. Y �, �; � � fi �. ;
� r , ��
A f . � ' _ ) -��
L ��� �� ��� � �r���
+�3� .'.E � ". � . t� �' ��.. ,Qy� •�S,_ � m ..
{^; " y ..�' :
� �' , � +� � � . . . � .( ; �,.y �
+« . . " �. .. � . . x.. , ., ",,
�
. � - r':���� R' r
r �'' t " . - ` S
�( � r � - � .. ��'� �.���;A'� As'����m�.c�"0 �.�„�'� "4
'� . t„ �y������>> -y � �!
t . . � �, t � ��� {
ct+ , . . a ,.: � � ������y ' ��.`;'3�,
. � . � ,'r� ' �� j �A� � � ��
�
41 y9 .:!?i. 1 , 4 �r `
, $ a "."$f m+,.
. . '. . " . - x'' . �' .`
.., . .. �p�. . S� x�
' �� �
� , � � — r.
� ,� : �
� t # �` � '�.� ; r��� '�
� — � �4a��
a :� � � �.�� ��;,
E M c � z # . .d��
� � � � �' . � � � j � � .�.
�', s � � � �.��, i r, ��
� �
��, ', � r < x . �� ��
����� i ����� �
�� s f ` x��
'� � . . :��. rr } � � � � a�
£ a `' �
.� r' $�
$ � � ��
? �: ` �' M£
�� i�f . .. .1 ?���1�i"..`,8�
4 � � r°� ri.iw
� '� f +i �� � - _ �,. ,� r : � k S y
� r 1` .�+`tr 1."�.�
� . � ° v �', fa. ��' � .s..
�* �',-3"-u� . � ° 't� % �x � V Y �.f .� n�� �t'"�:� '
�`�, . � a �°'" ?'�,� "� �'' kQ. C .. ss 3'4 �- -� xx
. . , � * ' A v .
x �'� � . . r. � � x ky �,��` h � �a 3 `� ��33������. �..
��� ,. � +` ��;Fx �' r �", � C �"s' �. �!'f�«'''�`
t�k " � - � < �k�. j .,� �+.. .�..
1
G� � � � . t � C �° ����f��.
� - ��� y K���
� j' . � . � . . .. � " nF.:.;-
� ` � ' 1.' ;� � ���, �
� �� �� � �
� � � �
�' i'- � .`. � r F �� yf �`"`�
.1 �� y
y �i .. ���7 �#.._
� � . �. � `� � w�;�.
s�, �
'k .?' �. p{ ' 1T�� z� �� � ; .
, t � ��t� y �'S:��& �,� �T�' y�
_ � _ .) - v� ^ *?..�o���� � `,i
� . • �� .� � " . • "
f `i �i � �
Y y � {��
i� _ �� AS & � � ��~; i ^}�y���:� ,..
p b, ' � � ' �, ' y�
Y . .. . � e .. Y"
�",�� ��
KW „` s x ` ��{ ., � �
� n {� � � .
t � .� ,� - yy ,�.��,�' �,i�
k ' .r
� � '' rt�'� s. F r,.� �.an : ����.��.:��
. . , � k^�� . .� i`. .t��Y,
. . � . .S� . , 'ti � � ai'. :S !� ��i
�'I�..e: . . .
�.`�a"r'� .
u .�
��i��
�` Pf d
f� {. �
�. k�
�y.�'E:«
�'';u., 't'� . . _ _ , _ . _ . . .
.'__ . .. ':. � . ... _._._..
5
;F
j
_
?i
4 �:
o r �<; . ,. , '� �� . . .. ,. _ r. #-�;t.��0%A
�r-.� t X..'�-r '�:�,tY �#3%R' `�t':a�„�4
7 p4: Te:S {'^.
; '
#..
!„ =�
a.t.
✓•
T _
A, �. _ ` �, _.,+ p.
,.y:;
i«.
:Yt
�:A b �`,�j ' .�y:
t
'K rt A¢
b`
s �� � -
l��
'� ;i �,�'"r
A�
�.0
'w
Y
�
'�
.}`i
i`,
r
���
i ;�i ,
�� �'� Al� � i
t, :
� a'
4 � yq�y,
3 r�s "F
wX
.� �� .. ��i �� ,� "�*�
'� .•. ) ';�i.
� �
� Y� , s ,'a �..
a, �` � > .- 3''�
f� r�+ �5^ �
j: ���
� `�'
.�
�` �;'� . �' a 3y
t,
��. M�
t' k ar
,t�s� �f
� � �
��� y
�k
`�i .'�"4 C"��i ��=
'� :S
� I
.$ �
� � ^�
�� .,,.. �i �
��x� � � , �} .'
4��}� � ,:P # � - £ rv�
(d°� : . � .;� �. >9�'�'9°F"-�a' �t''* � . , �
.,,�
�t,� �� � - . a�:
f
V ,� �.
� s �'�^
. ��� � � . . F .
?- - - . � � � f ui .
�h'
. . r .. �` �t- k 5'
l� . . r . a . . �t���:
�
. _ k=:. - �� �a�� ,
_ � � +�"#t S'i{,,�
� ,
�� ` 7 t
� �'� ts �
� '
� �„ - a i a
� . � � .. � � �.
�" '� F �. � ` � �. s�^'`�.
t �. "' x" #
�`���. � .- � . . . . . � - ,- � �'.u,�s,�',���
M � . . �� � A ��� � *
�' � � � - � � , � � �� �
� � �: a ,;
� ± � ��'� �' �;�°" ��� �' � ,
�' a "� '"e�
r _ A
r . '� � e t '' •* 3
1 � �� ���e
� Y �5 i A.d""� k+ � "-'.��`� �
i.: � � .
C A ✓'�" �Z �
� . � � �� s � ��� '�' �.
i s°� S� ,� ��5_
�� �t R� �s' r : � +.. F ?:�.:
� . - '<�'�'i,� � �. � �. "�� . .
E.� �" , . . .. , i r `� .��d � �F.o � �,��'a'ie°"!'
rr � . , .. � . ti � '-'{.�`.
� ;�
b
��4
� .
� '
� . ' t '�' �'�
i� ��4^
&
{ u �s �
�4 , �
y S � . .. , ^'1
g
i ' w �" �
i # ,��.
� .�,.� �c,.
� t.
t n'.�"`z'� 2 .
.. .9-�i,? �.� .., . .1�.:�.
4 �
S-
'1C+
��
�
^�:a .. � � , x
€a. ....._.
y � .
��-��v F, � � ` � ,� -
� �q r,�` . � � �� h , .
i - � Y' 'i � �. �1 �� "
? . . . , •ku�` } Y � d4 .��1f NL � Y.. � � 2 � � i { �i .
� j 3 a-e�s.�G. ; G - .
� di�� .,y�.,� �
� ,�� � .k .�Y T k'���� a 14 i` � � �A :#� + ��z+�
7 ����.-.'�" ? ; L•tPSi
5 i + ' j` A `� j1'� .. x"� t y �y. { y� �.
3 .� �,.. �, 5`.� 4 � a t4 '� 4
- - �, � � "�, r a�� R�r � sM� � ^`' �� L,h �. '��"Y�. % �
v �...�.. �s° 3.:�+•*.f� ,,. �i'' t}'e'����r.fid �
�:sh . � r � �4 .,� '�, t r �r. � �'.
p . .! � r, � rs .
r s�
< ' k, :
� a � r� �
� � � >� '
., . ,
`: <
_ ,. ; , , �,
� ��� �?j '� � ���
,.
�` � � � � � � � �"` � '��� i �
.. � . �r .' > �� y 4T't''&
. . � � # ! r�a� �t� `4 . `/ �� ��: k '� d�^
� �' �+,� L �y�.� r, � �,� . 't � s
� � . _ '� ig � �+ ��'�f 22 . �� � '1 �.;
r C< a.
_ . ��G 4 �rXa.�" s' z x � � �� ��'
Y s�yr,.
Y . ' y*,.� �i l.' � 4 ,�' *�� �4` Y9�' 6.5'.
. . , . $k�" h` �'� . , �' +.
. ' . t ;' �. .�
, � .G` i ,�' ,,`F�e
' " R
t{ j
§ �.� k ^ �� x � ��p 7 k .
t:
� _ S'i ,
S,�' � . . . F�
' . .d -: . . . ...� .. � �, .,. . ` ,
;��
�k
�'� '` �. z
� � - ? _ �•
� ; ' `"�'� '� � � �� �
��, � �� t£ ���,��� � � �
s i � �
� . : b ��4 >� 's:. � �� � �E + �'�.;�;,
», �
�`� . .g a, _t- .i^� � � �: yt a
�'��� ,� � a� . �y, �
� � � f . �Yi Y q�`•�•
y,��,¢..�r' Y.; . ,, v��� �,'. : �s }t�:
�� ��`� ;' '`' � _ �' �3 5� ,� �`.
� � � � �� � ���
4 � � " � �,�, �
-. .�t'
: _
#� �
r �
. . . . .. . . .. . _. �2; ua . . ,:,r:..+:'�� . � . . _ e� �5
�
� . . � F v .�l � Fi.,e,.x .'
{', n ' ` � z�t<�z �
a� � � '��, '�.�+'�.�, e � .
� " . � ' . . .:; � ; ,..r.�'� �-,,�� -�s .: - .
S �„�`` 3 y � .
, �- . � � , , .. _ .
� _ :� . " �s , t 7 .Ya+ y:=v� t �
r � �s .� o- lw'�'ft '�,i Tiw r,�=.t�`." F ..+` s�., fi'�� ,k
- `t. ��. � �..�, ���� � '�`^�'F� -
�� ; � � �"���t�t � -
' � ,-y <.,
� - � - ti ?.i�c� rt ,J!.
' YN�.'4.� .
`S.� l q'3� �� � �
�
;u ai'� �
i�� �� �: �.,�
� :��:
�� '`� � _.. � � _ � �,.� �..
,,e.. ±��
_,__
� .
;
'� � �. � � �,� �
. .. £ , d
- ' s. � <� ,�>,
• , -
, . ,. �. , x.
.;� � ; x ,� �� s �` t ��
- _ � ,-;;s�
' �` �"a
, _
�.,"� , %
:' � �#'JI.1��� � �r ����2 �,� f5a -���'� � _� 3 �,
� � V{
f
1 ' , . `. 3 r� 7�� �y A �iy i y� � � '�p,� �
.. . �' i �y� C �9�.
��' ��,��� ' � ��
� < ���„ ,
�` ;:s
,�_.
t
� � , ��r � �,...
r-
.
�
- : . � ... _ 4T z`i
� � � � � . � .. � � . . l�:
' � . � ' .. .� S
- . . . . . . _ .�' �.�t.
.: � � , � � � � ..
� . � � . � ♦ �� �9 F i �;# � k�::
. . . . . . . . . ' � � t.� ' � �
. � :k� � .� _ �
x � �
.� *�
" .. . . ,�S .l � �,���• <, '+ 3 .rsi
� , ., ��' ' � � '�'
� ✓� ' fi � ., � '�
�,� ,
x_
� � � ti.
�
�'��,� _ � 5:
� � ' � � � `�" � �;�
, _ . _ ' 1
z �'�`
. � . ..
�;:
� _ : ; ; ;
� :
- � � >�4�
. ., .
�
, _ �„
�3 .�
� � .. ,
� r:�m � �; �a
._�
� � � � _ �r f '
� ,
� ._ �
� : "'
� � � � ��� � �
�.
� F �
C` � 1 4 �� � . - �
l t � +
� � �`
fi
11 �k�
t �� �i
C ��
� .. � - �; i � � .{,:
� � � � � � � , - �
.�. ..� � � . , � ��:
. . . . . . .. . � ' � � - . - *�
�
� � � � � - . . �;F. � `'.�
" . .. . . . . . . .. . gr
,
, . �. . . .. ..._
. . . �. . -' , , . . ' . . -, .�'
. . �, : �. .. �, , �. ::�. ;' � � �.�
. . , _ . � . � ��.
� . . . � � � � .. - � �
4' �
3